Duke Energy CORP

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _to_

Commission file number Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices and Telephone Number IRS Employer Identification Number

1-32853 DUKE ENERGY CORP ORATION 20-2777218

(a Delaware corporation)

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte , North Carolina 28202-1803

704 - 382-3853

__________________________________

Registrant, State of Incorporation Registrant, State of Incorporation

or Organization, Address of or Organization, Address of

Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Principal Executive Offices, Telephone

Commission Number and IRS Employer Commission Number and IRS Employer

file number Identification Number file number Identification Number

_____________________________________

1-4928 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC 1-3274 DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC

(a North Carolina limited liability company) (a Florida limited liability company)

526 South Church Street 299 First Avenue North

Charlotte , North Carolina 28202-1803 St. Petersburg , Florida 33701

704 - 382-3853 704 - 382-3853

56-0205520 59-0247770

____________________________________

1-15929 PROGRESS ENERGY, INC. 1-1232 DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.

(a North Carolina corporation) (an Ohio corporation)

410 South Wilmington Street 139 East Fourth Street

Raleigh , North Carolina 27601-1748 Cincinnati , Ohio 45202

704 - 382-3853 704 - 382-3853

56-2155481 31-0240030

_____________________________________

1-3382 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC 1-3543 DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC

(a North Carolina limited liability company) (an Indiana limited liability company)

410 South Wilmington Street 1000 East Main Street

Raleigh , North Carolina 27601-1748 Plainfield , Indiana 46168

704 - 382-3853 704 - 382-3853

56-0165465 35-0594457

____________________________________

1-6196 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.

(a North Carolina corporation)

4720 Piedmont Row Drive

Charlotte , North Carolina 28210

704 - 364-3120

56-0556998

_____________________________________

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Name of each exchange on

Registrant Title of each class Trading symbols which registered

Duke Energy Common Stock, $0.001 par value DUK New York Stock Exchange LLC

Duke Energy 5.125% Junior Subordinated Debentures due DUKH New York Stock Exchange LLC

January 15, 2073

Duke Energy 5.625% Junior Subordinated Debentures due DUKB New York Stock Exchange LLC

September 15, 2078

Duke Energy Depositary Shares , each representing a 1/1,000th DUK PR A New York Stock Exchange LLC

interest in a share of 5.75% Series A Cumulative

Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value

$0.001 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy)	Yes	☒	No	☐	Duke Energy Florida, LLC (Duke Energy Florida)	Yes	☒	No	☐
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas)	Yes	☒	No	☐	Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Duke Energy Ohio)	Yes	☒	No	☐
Progress Energy, Inc. (Progress Energy)	Yes	☒	No	☐	Duke Energy Indiana, LLC (Duke Energy Indiana)	Yes	☒	No	☐
Duke Energy Progress, LLC (Duke Energy Progress)	Yes	☒	No	☐	Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. (Piedmont)	Yes	☒	No	☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Duke Energy	Yes	☒	No	☐	Duke Energy Florida	Yes	☒	No	☐
Duke Energy Carolinas	Yes	☒	No	☐	Duke Energy Ohio	Yes	☒	No	☐
Progress Energy	Yes	☒	No	☐	Duke Energy Indiana	Yes	☒	No	☐
Duke Energy Progress	Yes	☒	No	☐	Piedmont	Yes	☒	No	☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Duke Energy	Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐
Duke Energy Carolinas	Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐
Progress Energy	Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐
Duke Energy Progress	Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐
Duke Energy Florida	Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐
Duke Energy Ohio	Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐
Duke Energy Indiana	Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐
Piedmont	Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐	Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐	Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Duke Energy	Yes	☐	No	☒	Duke Energy Florida	Yes	☐	No	☒
Duke Energy Carolinas	Yes	☐	No	☒	Duke Energy Ohio	Yes	☐	No	☒
Progress Energy	Yes	☐	No	☒	Duke Energy Indiana	Yes	☐	No	☒
Duke Energy Progress	Yes	☐	No	☒	Piedmont	Yes	☐	No	☒

Number of shares of Common stock outstanding at July 31, 2019 :

Registrant	Description	Shares
Duke Energy	Common stock, $0.001 par value	728,601,060

This combined Form 10-Q is filed separately by eight registrants: Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont (collectively the Duke Energy Registrants). Information contained herein relating to any individual registrant is filed by such registrant solely on its own behalf. Each registrant makes no representation as to information relating exclusively to the other registrants.

Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and are therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instructions H(2) of Form 10-Q.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Duke Energy Corporation Financial Statements	9
	Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Financial Statements	15
	Progress Energy, Inc. Financial Statements	19
	Duke Energy Progress, LLC Financial Statements	23
	Duke Energy Florida, LLC Financial Statements	27
	Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. Financial Statements	31
	Duke Energy Indiana, LLC Financial Statements	35
	Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. Financial Statements	39
	Combined Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Note 1 – Organization and Basis of Presentation	43
	Note 2 – Business Segments	45
	Note 3 – Regulatory Matters	47
	Note 4 – Commitments and Contingencies	58
	Note 5 – Leases	62
	Note 6 – Debt and Credit Facilities	67
	Note 7 – Asset Retirement Obligations	69
	Note 8 – Goodwill	70
	Note 9 – Related Party Transactions	71
	Note 10 – Derivatives and Hedging	72
	Note 11 – Investments in Debt and Equity Securities	77
	Note 12 – Fair Value Measurements	82
	Note 13 – Variable Interest Entities	87
	Note 14 – Revenue	91
	Note 15 – Stockholders' Equity	96
	Note 16 – Employee Benefit Plans	97
	Note 17 – Income Taxes	99
	Note 18 – Subsequent Events	99
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	100
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	122
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	122
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	124
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	124
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	124
Item 6.	Exhibits	125
	Signatures	128

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and can often be identified by terms and phrases that include “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “continue,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “predict,” “will,” “potential,” “forecast,” “target,” “guidance,” “outlook” or other similar terminology. Various factors may cause actual results to be materially different than the suggested outcomes within forward-looking statements; accordingly, there is no assurance that such results will be realized. These factors include, but are not limited to:

• State, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives, including costs of compliance with existing and future environmental requirements, including those related to climate change, as well as rulings that affect cost and investment recovery or have an impact on rate structures or market prices;

• The extent and timing of costs and liabilities to comply with federal and state laws, regulations and legal requirements related to coal ash remediation, including amounts for required closure of certain ash impoundments, are uncertain and difficult to estimate;

• The ability to recover eligible costs, including amounts associated with coal ash impoundment retirement obligations and costs related to significant weather events, and to earn an adequate return on investment through rate case proceedings and the regulatory process;

• The costs of decommissioning Crystal River Unit 3 and other nuclear facilities could prove to be more extensive than amounts estimated and all costs may not be fully recoverable through the regulatory process;

• Costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims;

• Industrial, commercial and residential growth or decline in service territories or customer bases resulting from sustained downturns of the economy and the economic health of our service territories or variations in customer usage patterns, including energy efficiency efforts and use of alternative energy sources, such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies;

• Federal and state regulations, laws and other efforts designed to promote and expand the use of energy efficiency measures and distributed generation technologies, such as private solar and battery storage, in Duke Energy service territories could result in customers leaving the electric distribution system, excess generation resources as well as stranded costs;

• Advancements in technology;

• Additional competition in electric and natural gas markets and continued industry consolidation;

• The influence of weather and other natural phenomena on operations, including the economic, operational and other effects of severe storms, hurricanes, droughts, earthquakes and tornadoes, including extreme weather associated with climate change;

• The ability to successfully operate electric generating facilities and deliver electricity to customers including direct or indirect effects to the company resulting from an incident that affects the U.S. electric grid or generating resources;

• The ability to obtain the necessary permits and approvals and to complete necessary or desirable pipeline expansion or infrastructure projects in our natural gas business;

• Operational interruptions to our natural gas distribution and transmission activities;

• The availability of adequate interstate pipeline transportation capacity and natural gas supply;

• The impact on facilities and business from a terrorist attack, cybersecurity threats, data security breaches, operational accidents, information technology failures or other catastrophic events, such as fires, explosions, pandemic health events or other similar occurrences;

• The inherent risks associated with the operation of nuclear facilities, including environmental, health, safety, regulatory and financial risks, including the financial stability of third-party service providers;

• The timing and extent of changes in commodity prices and interest rates and the ability to recover such costs through the regulatory process, where appropriate, and their impact on liquidity positions and the value of underlying assets;

• The results of financing efforts, including the ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, which can be affected by various factors, including credit ratings, interest rate fluctuations, compliance with debt covenants and conditions and general market and economic conditions;

• Credit ratings of the Duke Energy Registrants may be different from what is expected;

• Declines in the market prices of equity and fixed-income securities and resultant cash funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans, other post-retirement benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;

• Construction and development risks associated with the completion of the Duke Energy Registrants’ capital investment projects, including risks related to financing, obtaining and complying with terms of permits, meeting construction budgets and schedules and satisfying operating and environmental performance standards, as well as the ability to recover costs from customers in a timely manner, or at all;

• Changes in rules for regional transmission organizations, including changes in rate designs and new and evolving capacity markets, and risks related to obligations created by the default of other participants;

• The ability to control operation and maintenance costs;

• The level of creditworthiness of counterparties to transactions;

• Employee workforce factors, including the potential inability to attract and retain key personnel;

• The ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or distributions to Duke Energy Corporation holding company (the Parent);

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

• The performance of projects undertaken by our nonregulated businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new opportunities;

• The effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies;

• The impact of U.S. tax legislation to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows and our credit ratings;

• The impacts from potential impairments of goodwill or equity method investment carrying values; and

• The ability to implement our business strategy, including enhancing existing technology systems.

Additional risks and uncertainties are identified and discussed in the Duke Energy Registrants' reports filed with the SEC and available at the SEC's website at sec.gov. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than described. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and the Duke Energy Registrants expressly disclaim an obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Glossary of Terms

The following terms or acronyms used in this Form 10-Q are defined below:

Term or Acronym	Definition
2013 Settlement	Revised and Restated Stipulation and Settlement Agreement approved in November 2013 among Duke Energy Florida, the Florida OPC and other customer advocates
2017 Settlement	Second Revised and Restated Settlement Agreement in 2017 among Duke Energy Florida, the Florida OPC and other customer advocates, which replaces and supplants the 2013 Settlement
ACP	Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, a limited liability company owned by Dominion, Duke Energy and Southern Company Gas
ACP pipeline	The approximately 600-mile proposed interstate natural gas pipeline
AFS	Available for Sale
AFUDC	Allowance for funds used during construction
the Agents	Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Citigroup Global Market Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC
ALJ	Administrative Law Judge
AMI	Advanced Metering Infrastructure
AMT	Alternative Minimum Tax
AOCI	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
ARO	Asset retirement obligations
ATM	At-the-market
Beckjord	Beckjord Generating Station
Belews Creek	Belews Creek Steam Station
Bison	Bison Insurance Company Limited
Cardinal	Cardinal Pipeline Company, LLC
CC	Combined Cycle
CCR	Coal Combustion Residuals
Citrus County CC	Citrus County Combined Cycle Facility
Coal Ash Act	North Carolina Coal Ash Management Act of 2014
the Company	Duke Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries
Constitution	Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
CPCN	Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
CPRE	Competitive Procurement of Renewable Energy
CRC	Cinergy Receivables Company LLC
Crystal River Unit 3	Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Plant
CWA	Clean Water Act
D.C. Circuit Court	U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
DEFPF	Duke Energy Florida Project Finance, LLC
DEFR	Duke Energy Florida Receivables, LLC
DEPR	Duke Energy Progress Receivables, LLC
DERF	Duke Energy Receivables Finance Company, LLC
DRIP	Dividend Reinvestment Program
Duke Energy	Duke Energy Corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries)
Duke Energy Ohio	Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.
Duke Energy Progress	Duke Energy Progress, LLC

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Duke Energy Carolinas	Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Duke Energy Florida	Duke Energy Florida, LLC
Duke Energy Indiana	Duke Energy Indiana, LLC
Duke Energy Kentucky	Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc.
Duke Energy Registrants	Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont
the EDA	Equity Distribution Agreement
EDIT	Excess deferred income tax
EPA	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPC	Engineering, Procurement and Construction agreement
EPS	Earnings Per Share
ESP	Electric Security Plan
ETR	Effective tax rate
Exchange Act	Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC	Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FES	FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.
Fitch	Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Fluor	Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
FPSC	Florida Public Service Commission
FTR	Financial transmission rights
FV-NI	Fair value through net income
GAAP	Generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S.
GAAP Reported Earnings	Net Income Attributable to Duke Energy Corporation
GAAP Reported EPS	Diluted EPS Attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
GWh	Gigawatt-hours
Hardy Storage	Hardy Storage Company, LLC
HLBV	Hypothetical Liquidation at Book Value
ICPA	Inter-Company Power Agreement
IGCC	Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
IMR	Integrity Management Rider
IRP	Integrated Resource Plan
IRS	Internal Revenue Service
Investment Trusts	NDTF investments and grantor trusts of Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana
IURC	Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission
JDA	Joint Dispatch Agreement
KPSC	Kentucky Public Service Commission
Lee Nuclear Station	William States Lee III Nuclear Station
MGP	Manufactured gas plant
MISO	Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MMBtu	Million British Thermal Unit
Moody's	Moody's Investors Service, Inc.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

MW	Megawatt
MWh	Megawatt-hour
NAV	Net asset value
NCDEQ	North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (formerly the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources)
NCUC	North Carolina Utilities Commission
NDTF	Nuclear decommissioning trust funds
NMC	National Methanol Company
NPDES	National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPNS	Normal purchase/normal sale
NRC	U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OPEB	Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations
ORS	South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff
OTTI	Other-than-temporary impairment
OVEC	Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
Piedmont	Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
Piedmont Term Loan	Term loan facility with commitments totaling $350M entered in June 2017
Pine Needle	Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC
Pioneer	Pioneer Transmission, LLC
PJM	PJM Interconnection, LLC
PMPA	Piedmont Municipal Power Agency
PPAs	Purchase Power Agreements
Progress Energy	Progress Energy, Inc.
PSCSC	Public Service Commission of South Carolina
PUCO	Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
REC	Renewable Energy Certificate
REC Solar	REC Solar Corp.
ROU assets	Right-of-use assets
RRBA	Roanoke River Basin Association
SELC	Southern Environmental Law Center
S&P	Standard & Poor's Rating Services
Subsidiary Registrants	Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont
the Tax Act	Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
TPUC	Tennessee Public Utility Commission
U.S.	United States
VIE	Variable Interest Entity
WACC	Weighted Average Cost of Capital
WNA	Weather normalization adjustment
W.S. Lee CC	William States Lee Combined Cycle Facility

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions, except per-share amounts)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Operating Revenues
Regulated electric	$ 5,423		$ 5,178		$ 10,708		$ 10,462
Regulated natural gas	280		291		1,008		991
Nonregulated electric and other	170		174		320		325
Total operating revenues	5,873		5,643		12,036		11,778
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	1,641		1,574		3,250		3,250
Cost of natural gas	76		89		403		402
Operation, maintenance and other	1,434		1,544		2,853		3,008
Depreciation and amortization	1,089		973		2,178		1,940
Property and other taxes	334		315		677		631
Impairment charges	4		172		4		215
Total operating expenses	4,578		4,667		9,365		9,446
Gains (Losses) on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	3		3		—		( 97	)
Operating Income	1,298		979		2,671		2,235
Other Income and Expenses
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	44		36		87		12
Other income and expenses, net	89		110		204		196
Total other income and expenses	133		146		291		208
Interest Expense	542		518		1,085		1,033
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes	889		607		1,877		1,410
Income Tax Expense From Continuing Operations	141		100		236		281
Income From Continuing Operations	748		507		1,641		1,129
Loss From Discontinued Operations, net of tax	—		( 5	)	—		( 5	)
Net Income	748		502		1,641		1,124
Less: Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests	( 84	)	2		( 91	)	4
Less: Preferred Dividends	12		—		12		—
Net Income Attributable to Duke Energy Corporation	$ 820		$ 500		$ 1,720		$ 1,120
Earnings Per Share – Basic and Diluted
Income from continuing operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
Basic and Diluted	$ 1.12		$ 0.72		$ 2.36		$ 1.60
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
Basic and Diluted	$ —		$ ( 0.01	)	$ —		$ ( 0.01	)
Net income attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
Basic and Diluted	$ 1.12		$ 0.71		$ 2.36		$ 1.59
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic	728		703		728		702
Diluted	728		704		728		702

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Net Income	$ 748		$ 502		$ 1,641		$ 1,124
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax
Pension and OPEB adjustments	3		1		3		2
Net unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges	( 29	)	1		( 46	)	13
Reclassification into earnings from cash flow hedges	2		( 2	)	3		( 1	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities	4		( 2	)	8		( 5	)
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax	( 20	)	( 2	)	( 32	)	9
Comprehensive Income	728		500		1,609		1,133
Less: Comprehensive (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests	( 84	)	2		( 91	)	4
Less: Preferred Dividends	12		—		12		—
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Duke Energy Corporation	$ 800		$ 498		$ 1,688		$ 1,129

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 336		$ 442
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $16 at 2019 and 2018)	646		962
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $55 at 2019 and 2018)	2,153		2,172
Inventory	3,189		3,084
Regulatory assets (includes $52 at 2019 and 2018 related to VIEs)	1,918		2,005
Other (includes $140 at 2019 and $162 at 2018 related to VIEs)	1,267		1,049
Total current assets	9,509		9,714
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost	141,363		134,458
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 44,482	)	( 43,126	)
Generation facilities to be retired, net	317		362
Net property, plant and equipment	97,198		91,694
Other Noncurrent Assets
Goodwill	19,303		19,303
Regulatory assets (includes $1,019 at 2019 and $1,041 at 2018 related to VIEs)	13,393		13,617
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds	7,621		6,720
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net	1,735		—
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates	1,715		1,409
Other (includes $289 at 2019 and $261 at 2018 related to VIEs)	2,975		2,935
Total other noncurrent assets	46,742		43,984
Total Assets	$ 153,449		$ 145,392
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 2,512		$ 3,487
Notes payable and commercial paper	3,793		3,410
Taxes accrued	521		577
Interest accrued	564		559
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $232 at 2019 and $227 at 2018 related to VIEs)	2,698		3,406
Asset retirement obligations	739		919
Regulatory liabilities	600		598
Other	2,020		2,085
Total current liabilities	13,447		15,041
Long-Term Debt (includes $4,070 at 2019 and $3,998 at 2018 related to VIEs)	54,342		51,123
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	8,532		7,806
Asset retirement obligations	11,889		9,548
Regulatory liabilities	15,294		14,834
Operating lease liabilities	1,502		—
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	959		988
Investment tax credits	569		568
Other (includes $222 at 2019 and $212 at 2018 related to VIEs)	1,583		1,650
Total other noncurrent liabilities	40,328		35,394
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 40 million depositary shares authorized and outstanding at 2019	973		—
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 2 billion shares authorized; 728 million shares outstanding at 2019 and 727 million shares outstanding at 2018	1		1
Additional paid-in capital	40,885		40,795
Retained earnings	3,502		3,113
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	( 148	)	( 92	)
Total Duke Energy Corporation stockholders' equity	45,213		43,817
Noncontrolling interests	119		17
Total equity	45,332		43,834
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 153,449		$ 145,392

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 1,641		$ 1,124
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion (including amortization of nuclear fuel)	2,483		2,250
Equity component of AFUDC	( 67	)	( 106	)
Losses on sales of other assets	—		97
Impairment charges	4		215
Deferred income taxes	527		289
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	( 87	)	( 12	)
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	4		31
Contributions to qualified pension plans	—		( 141	)
Payments for asset retirement obligations	( 336	)	( 245	)
Payment for disposal of other assets	—		( 105	)
Other rate case adjustments	—		37
Provision for rate refunds	57		281
(Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions	( 11	)	7
Receivables	304		( 27	)
Inventory	( 110	)	70
Other current assets	( 265	)	21
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable	( 700	)	( 142	)
Taxes accrued	( 56	)	( 58	)
Other current liabilities	( 378	)	( 214	)
Other assets	7		( 112	)
Other liabilities	39		42
Net cash provided by operating activities	3,056		3,302
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	( 5,465	)	( 4,375	)
Contributions to equity method investments	( 162	)	( 140	)
Purchases of debt and equity securities	( 2,316	)	( 1,908	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities	2,302		1,866
Other	( 147	)	( 88	)
Net cash used in investing activities	( 5,788	)	( 4,645	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the:
Issuance of long-term debt	4,622		2,727
Issuance of preferred stock	973		—
Issuance of common stock	27		820
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt	( 2,155	)	( 2,190	)
Proceeds from the issuance of short-term debt with original maturities greater than 90 days	240		201
Payments for the redemption of short-term debt with original maturities greater than 90 days	( 299	)	( 160	)
Notes payable and commercial paper	383		1,090
Dividends paid	( 1,312	)	( 1,199	)
Other	143		( 24	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	2,622		1,265
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	( 110	)	( 78	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	591		505
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$ 481		$ 427
Supplemental Disclosures:
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures	$ 917		$ 978
Non-cash dividends	54		52

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
								Accumulated Other Comprehensive
								(Loss) Income
										Net Unrealized				Total
								Net Gains		(Losses) Gains				Duke Energy
			Common		Additional			(Losses) on		on Available-		Pension and		Corporation
	Preferred		Stock	Common	Paid-in	Retained		Cash Flow		for-Sale-		OPEB		Stockholders'		Noncontrolling		Total
(in millions)	Stock		Shares	Stock	Capital	Earnings		Hedges		Securities		Adjustments		Equity		Interests		Equity
Balance at March 31, 2018	$ —		701	$ 1	$ 38,839	$ 3,021		$ 3		$ ( 4	)	$ ( 68	)	$ 41,792		$ 6		$ 41,798
Net income	—		—	—	—	500		—		—		—		500		2		502
Other comprehensive (loss) income	—		—	—	—	—		( 1	)	( 2	)	1		( 2	)	—		( 2	)
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits	—		11	—	843	—		—		—		—		843		—		843
Common stock dividends	—		—	—	—	( 626	)	—		—		—		( 626	)	—		( 626	)
Other	—		—	—	—	( 1	)	—		1		—		—		—		—
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ —		712	$ 1	$ 39,682	$ 2,894		$ 2		$ ( 5	)	$ ( 67	)	$ 42,507		$ 8		$ 42,515
Balance at March 31, 2019	$ 974		728	$ 1	$ 40,823	$ 3,360		$ ( 36	)	$ —		$ ( 92	)	$ 45,030		$ 15		$ 45,045
Net income (loss)	—		—	—	—	820		—		—		—		820		( 84	)	736
Other comprehensive (loss) income	—		—	—	—	—		( 27	)	4		3		( 20	)	—		( 20	)
Preferred stock issuances, net of issuance costs	( 1	)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		( 1	)	—		( 1	)
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits	—		—	—	61	—		—		—		—		61		—		61
Common stock dividends	—		—	—	—	( 678	)	—		—		—		( 678	)	—		( 678	)
Contribution from noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries (c)	—		—	—	—	—		—		—		—		—		193		193
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries	—		—	—	—	—		—		—		—		—		( 1	)	( 1	)
Other	—		—	—	1	—		—		—		—		1		( 4	)	( 3	)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 973		728	$ 1	$ 40,885	$ 3,502		$ ( 63	)	$ 4		$ ( 89	)	$ 45,213		$ 119		$ 45,332

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
							Accumulated Other Comprehensive
							(Loss) Income
									Net Unrealized				Total
							Net Gains		(Losses) Gains				Duke Energy
		Common		Additional			(Losses) on		on Available-		Pension and		Corporation
	Preferred	Stock	Common	Paid-in	Retained		Cash Flow		for-Sale-		OPEB		Stockholders'		Noncontrolling		Total
(in millions)	Stock	Shares	Stock	Capital	Earnings		Hedges		Securities		Adjustments		Equity		Interests		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$ —	700	$ 1	$ 38,792	$ 3,013		$ ( 10	)	$ 12		$ ( 69	)	$ 41,739		$ ( 2	)	$ 41,737
Net income	—	—	—	—	1,120		—		—		—		1,120		4		1,124
Other comprehensive income (loss)	—	—	—	—	—		12		( 5	)	2		9		—		9
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits	—	12	—	890	—		—		—		—		890		—		890
Common stock dividends	—	—	—	—	( 1,251	)	—		—		—		( 1,251	)	—		( 1,251	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries	—	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		—		( 1	)	( 1	)
Other (a)	—	—	—	—	12		—		( 12	)	—		—		7		7
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ —	712	$ 1	$ 39,682	$ 2,894		$ 2		$ ( 5	)	$ ( 67	)	$ 42,507		$ 8		$ 42,515
Balance at December 31, 2018	$ —	727	$ 1	$ 40,795	$ 3,113		$ ( 14	)	$ ( 3	)	$ ( 75	)	$ 43,817		$ 17		$ 43,834
Net income (loss)	—	—	—	—	1,720		—		—		—		1,720		( 91	)	1,629
Other comprehensive (loss) income	—	—	—	—	—		( 43	)	8		3		( 32	)	—		( 32	)
Preferred stock issuances, net of issuance costs (b)	973	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		973		—		973
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits	—	1	—	89	—		—		—		—		89		—		89
Common stock dividends	—	—	—	—	( 1,354	)	—		—		—		( 1,354	)	—		( 1,354	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries (c)	—	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		—		193		193
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries	—	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		—		( 1	)	( 1	)
Other (d)	—	—	—	1	23		( 6	)	( 1	)	( 17	)	—		1		1
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 973	728	$ 1	$ 40,885	$ 3,502		$ ( 63	)	$ 4		$ ( 89	)	$ 45,213		$ 119		$ 45,332

(a) Amounts in Retained Earnings and Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income represent a cumulative-effect adjustment due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Financial Instruments Classification and Measurement.

(b) Duke Energy issued 40 million depositary shares of preferred stock in the first quarter of 2019.

(d) Amounts in Retained Earnings and Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income primarily represent impacts to accumulated other comprehensive income due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
(in millions)	2019	2018		2019	2018
Operating Revenues	$ 1,713	$ 1,672		$ 3,457	$ 3,435
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	395	407		867	880
Operation, maintenance and other	441	499		881	950
Depreciation and amortization	346	289		663	561
Property and other taxes	75	75		155	147
Impairment charges	5	177		5	190
Total operating expenses	1,262	1,447		2,571	2,728
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	—	( 1	)	—	( 1	)
Operating Income	451	224		886	706
Other Income and Expenses, net	41	35		72	74
Interest Expense	117	110		227	217
Income Before Income Taxes	375	149		731	563
Income Tax Expense	74	32		137	123
Net Income	$ 301	$ 117		$ 594	$ 440
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax
Reclassification into earnings from cash flow hedges	—	—		—	1
Comprehensive Income	$ 301	$ 117		$ 594	$ 441

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 15		$ 33
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2 at 2019 and 2018)	164		219
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 at 2019 and 2018)	671		699
Receivables from affiliated companies	101		182
Inventory	1,025		948
Regulatory assets	605		520
Other	17		72
Total current assets	2,598		2,673
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost	47,249		44,741
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 16,047	)	( 15,496	)
Net property, plant and equipment	31,202		29,245
Other Noncurrent Assets
Regulatory assets	3,392		3,457
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds	4,059		3,558
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net	141		—
Other	1,085		1,027
Total other noncurrent assets	8,677		8,042
Total Assets	$ 42,477		$ 39,960
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 640		$ 988
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	189		230
Notes payable to affiliated companies	804		439
Taxes accrued	209		171
Interest accrued	106		102
Current maturities of long-term debt	456		6
Asset retirement obligations	203		290
Regulatory liabilities	191		199
Other	499		571
Total current liabilities	3,297		2,996
Long-Term Debt	10,208		10,633
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies	300		300
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	3,779		3,689
Asset retirement obligations	5,139		3,659
Regulatory liabilities	6,392		5,999
Operating lease liabilities	117		—
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	90		99
Investment tax credits	234		231
Other	645		671
Total other noncurrent liabilities	16,396		14,348
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Member's equity	12,283		11,689
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	( 7	)	( 6	)
Total equity	12,276		11,683
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 42,477		$ 39,960

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 594		$ 440
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of nuclear fuel)	804		707
Equity component of AFUDC	( 21	)	( 39	)
Losses on sales of other assets	—		1
Impairment charges	5		190
Deferred income taxes	54		90
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	( 4	)	2
Contributions to qualified pension plans	—		( 46	)
Payments for asset retirement obligations	( 131	)	( 114	)
Provision for rate refunds	35		121
(Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions	( 8	)	8
Receivables	83		( 33	)
Receivables from affiliated companies	81		( 22	)
Inventory	( 77	)	( 16	)
Other current assets	( 133	)	( 33	)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable	( 282	)	( 59	)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	( 41	)	( 51	)
Taxes accrued	38		( 78	)
Other current liabilities	( 71	)	( 123	)
Other assets	91		( 6	)
Other liabilities	( 18	)	( 29	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	999		910
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	( 1,357	)	( 1,270	)
Purchases of debt and equity securities	( 1,114	)	( 976	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities	1,114		976
Other	( 46	)	( 64	)
Net cash used in investing activities	( 1,403	)	( 1,334	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt	25		991
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt	( 3	)	( 702	)
Notes payable to affiliated companies	365		636
Distributions to parent	—		( 500	)
Other	( 1	)	( 1	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	386		424
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	( 18	)	—
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	33		16
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 15		$ 16
Supplemental Disclosures:
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures	$ 252		$ 343

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
			Accumulated Other
			Comprehensive
			Loss
			Net Losses on
	Member's		Cash Flow		Total
(in millions)	Equity		Hedges		Equity
Balance at March 31, 2018	$ 11,441		$ ( 6	)	$ 11,435
Net income	117		—		117
Distributions to parent	( 250	)	—		( 250	)
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 11,308		$ ( 6	)	$ 11,302
Balance at March 31, 2019	$ 11,982		$ ( 7	)	$ 11,975
Net income	301		—		301
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 12,283		$ ( 7	)	$ 12,276
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
			Accumulated Other
			Comprehensive
			Loss
			Net Losses on
	Member's		Cash Flow		Total
(in millions)	Equity		Hedges		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$ 11,368		$ ( 7	)	$ 11,361
Net income	440		—		440
Other comprehensive income	—		1		1
Distributions to parent	( 500	)	—		( 500	)
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 11,308		$ ( 6	)	$ 11,302
Balance at December 31, 2018	$ 11,689		$ ( 6	)	$ 11,683
Net income	594		—		594
Other	—		( 1	)	( 1	)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 12,283		$ ( 7	)	$ 12,276

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Operating Revenues	$ 2,744		$ 2,498		$ 5,316		$ 5,074
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	988		895		1,913		1,871
Operation, maintenance and other	606		610		1,173		1,233
Depreciation and amortization	426		380		881		764
Property and other taxes	143		131		280		254
Impairment charges	—		4		—		33
Total operating expenses	2,163		2,020		4,247		4,155
(Losses) Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	( 1	)	6		( 1	)	12
Operating Income	580		484		1,068		931
Other Income and Expenses, net	34		42		65		77
Interest Expense	219		203		438		412
Income Before Income Taxes	395		323		695		596
Income Tax Expense	66		56		118		92
Net Income	329		267		577		504
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests	1		2		—		4
Net Income Attributable to Parent	$ 328		$ 265		$ 577		$ 500
Net Income	$ 329		$ 267		$ 577		$ 504
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax
Pension and OPEB adjustments	1		2		2		2
Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges	1		1		3		3
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities	1		( 1	)	1		( 1	)
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax	3		2		6		4
Comprehensive Income	332		269		583		508
Less: Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests	1		2		—		4
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Parent	$ 331		$ 267		$ 583		$ 504

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 51		$ 67
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6 at 2019 and $5 at 2018)	139		220
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8 at 2019 and 2018)	998		909
Receivables from affiliated companies	49		168
Inventory	1,480		1,459
Regulatory assets (includes $52 at 2019 and 2018 related to VIEs)	1,024		1,137
Other (includes $31 at 2019 and $39 at 2018 related to VIEs )	107		125
Total current assets	3,848		4,085
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost	52,758		50,260
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 16,808	)	( 16,398	)
Generation facilities to be retired, net	317		362
Net property, plant and equipment	36,267		34,224
Other Noncurrent Assets
Goodwill	3,655		3,655
Regulatory assets (includes $1,019 at 2019 and $1,041 at 2018 related to V IEs)	6,423		6,564
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds	3,562		3,162
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net	839		—
Other	982		974
Total other noncurrent assets	15,461		14,355
Total Assets	$ 55,576		$ 52,664
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 720		$ 1,172
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	235		360
Notes payable to affiliated companies	1,920		1,235
Taxes accrued	191		109
Interest accrued	226		246
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $54 at 2019 and $53 at 2018 related to VIEs )	1,026		1,672
Asset retirement obligations	416		514
Regulatory liabilities	250		280
Other	863		821
Total current liabilities	5,847		6,409
Long-Term Debt (includes $1,657 at 2019 and $1,636 at 2018 related to V IEs)	18,023		17,089
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies	150		150
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	4,141		3,941
Asset retirement obligations	5,777		4,897
Regulatory liabilities	5,191		5,049
Operating lease liabilities	747		—
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	509		521
Other	352		351
Total other noncurrent liabilities	16,717		14,759
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized and outstanding at 2019 and 2018	—		—
Additional paid-in capital	9,143		9,143
Retained earnings	5,715		5,131
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	( 21	)	( 20	)
Total Progress Energy, Inc. stockholders' equity	14,837		14,254
Noncontrolling interests	2		3
Total equity	14,839		14,257
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 55,576		$ 52,664

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 577		$ 504
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion (including amortization of nuclear fuel)	1,061		945
Equity component of AFUDC	( 31	)	( 52	)
Losses (gains) on sales of other assets	1		( 12	)
Impairment charges	—		33
Deferred income taxes	126		240
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	8		12
Contributions to qualified pension plans	—		( 45	)
Payments for asset retirement obligations	( 183	)	( 108	)
Other rate case adjustments	—		37
Provision for rate refunds	10		65
(Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions	( 1	)	14
Receivables	( 42	)	( 196	)
Receivables from affiliated companies	119		28
Inventory	( 26	)	71
Other current assets	114		( 214	)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable	( 196	)	15
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	( 125	)	( 19	)
Taxes accrued	82		80
Other current liabilities	( 162	)	( 58	)
Other assets	( 83	)	( 186	)
Other liabilities	17		4
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,266		1,158
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	( 1,988	)	( 1,727	)
Purchases of debt and equity securities	( 1,094	)	( 812	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities	1,089		820
Notes receivable from affiliated companies	—		( 69	)
Other	( 59	)	( 81	)
Net cash used in investing activities	( 2,052	)	( 1,869	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt	1,295		989
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt	( 1,188	)	( 635	)
Notes payable to affiliated companies	685		347
Other	2		( 3	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	794		698
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	8		( 13	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	112		87
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$ 120		$ 74
Supplemental Disclosures:
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures	$ 278		$ 366

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
				Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
						Net Unrealized				Total Progress
	Additional			Net Losses on		Gains (Losses) on		Pension and		Energy, Inc.
	Paid-in	Retained		Cash Flow		Available-for-		OPEB		Stockholders'	Noncontrolling		Total
(in millions)	Capital	Earnings		Hedges		Sale Securities		Adjustments		Equity	Interests		Equity
Balance at March 31, 2018	$ 9,142	$ 4,591		$ ( 16	)	$ ( 1	)	$ ( 12	)	$ 13,704	$ ( 1	)	$ 13,703
Net income	—	265		—		—		—		265	2		267
Other comprehensive income (loss)	—	—		1		( 1	)	2		2	—		2
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—	—		—		—		—		—	( 1	)	( 1	)
Other (a)	1	( 1	)	—		1		—		1	—		1
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 9,143	$ 4,855		$ ( 15	)	$ ( 1	)	$ ( 10	)	$ 13,972	$ —		$ 13,972
Balance at March 31, 2019	$ 9,143	$ 5,386		$ ( 14	)	$ ( 1	)	$ ( 8	)	$ 14,506	$ 2		$ 14,508
Net income	—	328		—		—		—		328	1		329
Other comprehensive income	—	—		1		1		1		3	—		3
Other	—	1		—		—		( 1	)	—	( 1	)	( 1	)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 9,143	$ 5,715		$ ( 13	)	$ —		$ ( 8	)	$ 14,837	$ 2		$ 14,839
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
				Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
						Net Unrealized				Total Progress
	Additional			Net Losses on		Gains (Losses) on		Pension and		Energy, Inc.
	Paid-in	Retained		Cash Flow		Available-for-		OPEB		Stockholders'	Noncontrolling		Total
	Capital	Earnings		Hedges		Sale Securities		Adjustments		Equity	Interests		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$ 9,143	$ 4,350		$ ( 18	)	$ 5		$ ( 12	)	$ 13,468	$ ( 3	)	$ 13,465
Net income	—	500		—		—		—		500	4		504
Other comprehensive income (loss)	—	—		3		( 1	)	2		4	—		4
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—	—		—		—		—		—	( 1	)	( 1	)
Other (a)	—	5		—		( 5	)	—		—	—		—
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 9,143	$ 4,855		$ ( 15	)	$ ( 1	)	$ ( 10	)	$ 13,972	$ —		$ 13,972
Balance at December 31, 2018	$ 9,143	$ 5,131		$ ( 12	)	$ ( 1	)	$ ( 7	)	$ 14,254	$ 3		$ 14,257
Net income	—	577		—		—		—		577	—		577
Other comprehensive income	—	—		3		1		2		6	—		6
Other (b)	—	7		( 4	)	—		( 3	)	—	( 1	)	( 1	)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 9,143	$ 5,715		$ ( 13	)	$ —		$ ( 8	)	$ 14,837	$ 2		$ 14,839

(b) Amounts in Retained Earnings and Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income primarily represent impacts to accumulated other comprehensive income due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended — June 30,		Six Months Ended — June 30,
(in millions)	2019	2018	2019	2018
Operating Revenues	$ 1,387	$ 1,291	$ 2,871	$ 2,751
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	479	408	994	917
Operation, maintenance and other	357	375	692	756
Depreciation and amortization	251	235	541	470
Property and other taxes	41	40	85	75
Impairment charges	—	1	—	33
Total operating expenses	1,128	1,059	2,312	2,251
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	—	1	—	2
Operating Income	259	233	559	502
Other Income and Expenses, net	24	19	48	37
Interest Expense	81	78	158	159
Income Before Income Taxes	202	174	449	380
Income Tax Expense	33	35	77	64
Net Income and Comprehensive Income	$ 169	$ 139	$ 372	$ 316

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 28		$ 23
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2 at 2019 and 2018)	53		75
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5 at 2019 and 2018)	518		547
Receivables from affiliated companies	40		23
Inventory	980		954
Regulatory assets	572		703
Other	34		62
Total current assets	2,225		2,387
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost	33,288		31,459
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 11,728	)	( 11,423	)
Generation facilities to be retired, net	317		362
Net property, plant and equipment	21,877		20,398
Other Noncurrent Assets
Regulatory assets	4,124		4,111
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds	2,833		2,503
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net	407		—
Other	586		612
Total other noncurrent assets	7,950		7,226
Total Assets	$ 32,052		$ 30,011
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 315		$ 660
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	182		278
Notes payable to affiliated companies	127		294
Taxes accrued	106		53
Interest accrued	110		116
Current maturities of long-term debt	6		603
Asset retirement obligations	413		509
Regulatory liabilities	167		178
Other	395		408
Total current liabilities	1,821		3,099
Long-Term Debt	8,893		7,451
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies	150		150
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	2,181		2,119
Asset retirement obligations	5,203		4,311
Regulatory liabilities	4,150		3,955
Operating lease liabilities	377		—
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	232		237
Investment tax credits	141		142
Other	91		106
Total other noncurrent liabilities	12,375		10,870
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Member's Equity	8,813		8,441
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 32,052		$ 30,011

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 372		$ 316
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of nuclear fuel)	634		565
Equity component of AFUDC	( 28	)	( 26	)
Gains on sales of other assets	—		( 2	)
Impairment charges	—		33
Deferred income taxes	26		53
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	1		7
Contributions to qualified pension plans	—		( 25	)
Payments for asset retirement obligations	( 166	)	( 89	)
Other rate case adjustments	—		37
Provision for rate refunds	10		65
(Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions	( 5	)	6
Receivables	58		( 104	)
Receivables from affiliated companies	( 17	)	2
Inventory	( 26	)	41
Other current assets	115		( 111	)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable	( 223	)	( 17	)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	( 96	)	( 4	)
Taxes accrued	53		26
Other current liabilities	( 74	)	( 38	)
Other assets	—		10
Other liabilities	21		13
Net cash provided by operating activities	655		758
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	( 1,115	)	( 996	)
Purchases of debt and equity securities	( 473	)	( 573	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities	458		556
Other	( 20	)	( 45	)
Net cash used in investing activities	( 1,150	)	( 1,058	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt	1,270		—
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt	( 602	)	—
Notes payable to affiliated companies	( 167	)	300
Other	( 1	)	( 2	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	500		298
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	5		( 2	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	23		20
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 28		$ 18
Supplemental Disclosures:
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures	$ 112		$ 172

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2018 and 2019
	Member's
(in millions)	Equity
Balance at March 31, 2018	$ 8,126
Net income	139
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 8,265
Balance at March 31, 2019	$ 8,644
Net income	169
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 8,813
	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2018 and 2019
	Member's
(in millions)	Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$ 7,949
Net income	316
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 8,265
Balance at December 31, 2018	$ 8,441
Net income	372
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 8,813

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Operating Revenues	$ 1,353		$ 1,203		$ 2,439		$ 2,318
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	509		486		919		953
Operation, maintenance and other	244		237		474		474
Depreciation and amortization	175		144		340		294
Property and other taxes	103		91		196		179
Total operating expenses	1,031		958		1,929		1,900
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	( 1	)	—		( 1	)	—
Operating Income	321		245		509		418
Other Income and Expenses, net	12		26		25		47
Interest Expense	83		66		165		137
Income Before Income Taxes	250		205		369		328
Income Tax Expense	49		37		72		57
Net Income	$ 201		$ 168		$ 297		$ 271
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities	—		( 1	)	1		( 1	)
Comprehensive Income	$ 201		$ 167		$ 298		$ 270

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 16		$ 36
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2019 and 2018)	84		143
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2019 and 2018)	480		362
Receivables from affiliated companies	18		28
Inventory	499		504
Regulatory assets (includes $52 at 2019 and 2018 related to VIEs)	452		434
Other (includes $31 at 2019 and $39 at 2018 related to VIEs )	46		46
Total current assets	1,595		1,553
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost	19,461		18,792
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 5,073	)	( 4,968	)
Net property, plant and equipment	14,388		13,824
Other Noncurrent Assets
Regulatory assets (includes $1,019 at 2019 and $1,041 at 2018 related to V IEs)	2,299		2,454
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds	729		659
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net	432		—
Other	311		311
Total other noncurrent assets	3,771		3,424
Total Assets	$ 19,754		$ 18,801
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 403		$ 511
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	62		91
Notes payable to affiliated companies	477		108
Taxes accrued	148		74
Interest accrued	70		75
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $54 at 2019 and $53 at 2018 related to VIEs )	671		270
Asset retirement obligations	3		5
Regulatory liabilities	83		102
Other	461		406
Total current liabilities	2,378		1,642
Long-Term Debt (includes $1,332 at 2019 and $1,336 at 2018 related to V IEs)	6,542		7,051
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	2,105		1,986
Asset retirement obligations	574		586
Regulatory liabilities	1,040		1,094
Operating lease liabilities	370		—
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	248		254
Other	104		93
Total other noncurrent liabilities	4,441		4,013
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Member's equity	6,394		6,097
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	( 1	)	( 2	)
Total equity	6,393		6,095
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 19,754		$ 18,801

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 297		$ 271
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	423		374
Equity component of AFUDC	( 2	)	( 26	)
Losses on sales of other assets	1		—
Deferred income taxes	82		206
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	5		3
Contributions to qualified pension plans	—		( 20	)
Payments for asset retirement obligations	( 17	)	( 19	)
(Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions	2		6
Receivables	( 101	)	( 92	)
Receivables from affiliated companies	10		( 4	)
Inventory	1		28
Other current assets	8		( 114	)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable	27		34
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	( 29	)	( 11	)
Taxes accrued	74		81
Other current liabilities	( 80	)	( 21	)
Other assets	( 81	)	( 196	)
Other liabilities	( 9	)	( 10	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	611		490
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	( 873	)	( 731	)
Purchases of debt and equity securities	( 621	)	( 239	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities	631		264
Notes receivable from affiliated companies	—		( 110	)
Other	( 37	)	( 35	)
Net cash used in investing activities	( 900	)	( 851	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt	25		989
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt	( 136	)	( 635	)
Notes payable to affiliated companies	369		—
Other	3		( 1	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	261		353
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	( 28	)	( 8	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	75		53
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$ 47		$ 45
Supplemental Disclosures:
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures	$ 166		$ 194

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
			Accumulated
			Other
			Comprehensive
			Income (Loss)
			Net Unrealized
			Gains (Losses) on
	Member's		Available-for-Sale		Total
(in millions)	Equity		Securities		Equity
Balance at March 31, 2018	$ 5,723		$ ( 2	)	$ 5,721
Net income	168		—		168
Other comprehensive loss	—		( 1	)	( 1	)
Other (a)	( 1	)	1		—
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 5,890		$ ( 2	)	$ 5,888
Balance at March 31, 2019	$ 6,193		$ ( 1	)	$ 6,192
Net income	201		—		201
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 6,394		$ ( 1	)	$ 6,393
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
			Accumulated
			Other
			Comprehensive
			Income (Loss)
			Net Unrealized
			Gains (Losses) on
	Member's		Available-for-Sale		Total
(in millions)	Equity		Securities		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$ 5,614		$ 4		$ 5,618
Net income	271		—		271
Other comprehensive loss	—		( 1	)	( 1	)
Other (a)	5		( 5	)	—
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 5,890		$ ( 2	)	$ 5,888
Balance at December 31, 2018	$ 6,097		$ ( 2	)	$ 6,095
Net income	297		—		297
Other comprehensive income	—		1		1
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 6,394		$ ( 1	)	$ 6,393

(a) Amounts in Member's Equity and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) represent a cumulative-effect adjustment due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Financial Instruments Classification and Measurement.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
(in millions)	2019	2018	2019	2018
Operating Revenues
Regulated electric	$ 336	$ 346	$ 691	$ 682
Regulated natural gas	97	103	273	277
Nonregulated electric and other	—	10	—	24
Total operating revenues	433	459	964	983
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power – regulated	86	93	179	185
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power – nonregulated	—	14	—	29
Cost of natural gas	10	15	64	69
Operation, maintenance and other	123	130	255	261
Depreciation and amortization	66	62	130	132
Property and other taxes	74	68	158	145
Total operating expenses	359	382	786	821
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	—	—	—	( 106	)
Operating Income	74	77	178	56
Other Income and Expenses, net	6	8	15	14
Interest Expense	24	23	54	45
Income Before Income Taxes	56	62	139	25
Income Tax Expense	9	16	23	4
Net Income and Comprehensive Income	$ 47	$ 46	$ 116	$ 21

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 8		$ 21
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2019 and $2 at 2018)	80		102
Receivables from affiliated companies	50		114
Inventory	124		126
Regulatory assets	47		33
Other	32		24
Total current assets	341		420
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost	9,776		9,360
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 2,761	)	( 2,717	)
Net property, plant and equipment	7,015		6,643
Other Noncurrent Assets
Goodwill	920		920
Regulatory assets	545		531
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net	22		—
Other	46		41
Total other noncurrent assets	1,533		1,492
Total Assets	$ 8,889		$ 8,555
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 257		$ 316
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	78		78
Notes payable to affiliated companies	203		274
Taxes accrued	135		202
Interest accrued	31		22
Current maturities of long-term debt	100		551
Asset retirement obligations	6		6
Regulatory liabilities	67		57
Other	76		74
Total current liabilities	953		1,580
Long-Term Debt	2,384		1,589
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies	25		25
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	872		817
Asset retirement obligations	83		87
Regulatory liabilities	802		840
Operating lease liabilities	21		—
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	94		79
Other	94		93
Total other noncurrent liabilities	1,966		1,916
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Common stock, $8.50 par value, 120 million shares authorized; 90 million shares outstanding at 2019 and 2018	762		762
Additional paid-in capital	2,776		2,776
Retained Earnings (Accumulated deficit)	23		( 93	)
Total equity	3,561		3,445
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 8,889		$ 8,555

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 116		$ 21
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	132		134
Equity component of AFUDC	( 7	)	( 8	)
Losses on sales of other assets	—		106
Deferred income taxes	45		( 2	)
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	—		2
Payments for asset retirement obligations	( 5	)	( 2	)
Provision for rate refunds	3		19
(Increase) decrease in
Receivables	24		( 7	)
Receivables from affiliated companies	64		62
Inventory	2		9
Other current assets	( 13	)	24
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable	( 44	)	( 34	)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	—		( 15	)
Taxes accrued	( 67	)	( 63	)
Other current liabilities	2		8
Other assets	( 18	)	( 7	)
Other liabilities	( 15	)	( 18	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	219		229
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	( 473	)	( 392	)
Notes receivable from affiliated companies	—		14
Other	( 31	)	( 43	)
Net cash used in investing activities	( 504	)	( 421	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt	794		—
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt	( 451	)	( 3	)
Notes payable to affiliated companies	( 71	)	190
Net cash provided by financing activities	272		187
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	( 13	)	( 5	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	21		12
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 8		$ 7
Supplemental Disclosures:
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures	$ 93		$ 70
Non-cash equity contribution from parent	—		106

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
		Additional	Retained
	Common	Paid-in	Earnings		Total
(in millions)	Stock	Capital	(Deficit)		Equity
Balance at March 31, 2018	$ 762	$ 2,670	$ ( 294	)	$ 3,138
Net income	—	—	46		46
Contribution from parent (a)	—	106	—		106
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 762	$ 2,776	$ ( 248	)	$ 3,290
Balance at March 31, 2019	$ 762	$ 2,776	$ ( 24	)	$ 3,514
Net income	—	—	47		47
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 762	$ 2,776	$ 23		$ 3,561
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
		Additional	Retained
	Common	Paid-in	Earnings		Total
(in millions)	Stock	Capital	(Deficit)		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$ 762	$ 2,670	$ ( 269	)	$ 3,163
Net income	—	—	21		21
Contribution from parent (a)	—	106	—		106
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 762	$ 2,776	$ ( 248	)	$ 3,290
Balance at December 31, 2018	$ 762	$ 2,776	$ ( 93	)	$ 3,445
Net income	—	—	116		116
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 762	$ 2,776	$ 23		$ 3,561

(a) Represents a non-cash settlement through equity of an intercompany payable from Duke Energy Ohio to its parent.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended — June 30,		Six Months Ended — June 30,
(in millions)	2019	2018	2019	2018
Operating Revenues	$ 714	$ 738	$ 1,482	$ 1,469
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	229	226	486	458
Operation, maintenance and other	188	197	377	378
Depreciation and amortization	132	126	263	256
Property and other taxes	20	20	39	40
Total operating expenses	569	569	1,165	1,132
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	3	—	—	—
Operating Income	148	169	317	337
Other Income and Expenses, net	8	6	27	13
Interest Expense	28	43	71	83
Income Before Income Taxes	128	132	273	267
Income Tax Expense	31	34	66	69
Net Income and Comprehensive Income	$ 97	$ 98	$ 207	$ 198

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 12		$ 24
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2019 and $2 at 2018)	49		52
Receivables from affiliated companies	83		122
Inventory	463		422
Regulatory assets	130		175
Other	42		35
Total current assets	779		830
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost	15,831		15,443
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 5,104	)	( 4,914	)
Net property, plant and equipment	10,727		10,529
Other Noncurrent Assets
Regulatory assets	1,038		982
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net	60		—
Other	203		194
Total other noncurrent assets	1,301		1,176
Total Assets	$ 12,807		$ 12,535
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 224		$ 200
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	66		83
Notes payable to affiliated companies	165		167
Taxes accrued	25		43
Interest accrued	59		58
Current maturities of long-term debt	3		63
Asset retirement obligations	115		109
Regulatory liabilities	24		25
Other	120		107
Total current liabilities	801		855
Long-Term Debt	3,570		3,569
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies	150		150
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	1,084		1,009
Asset retirement obligations	604		613
Regulatory liabilities	1,693		1,722
Operating lease liabilities	56		—
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	142		115
Investment tax credits	147		147
Other	14		16
Total other noncurrent liabilities	3,740		3,622
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Member's Equity	4,546		4,339
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 12,807		$ 12,535

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 207		$ 198
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	265		258
Equity component of AFUDC	( 9	)	( 7	)
Deferred income taxes	60		36
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	2		3
Contributions to qualified pension plans	—		( 8	)
Payments for asset retirement obligations	( 17	)	( 21	)
Provision for rate refunds	—		49
(Increase) decrease in
Receivables	5		2
Receivables from affiliated companies	39		36
Inventory	( 41	)	( 20	)
Other current assets	48		( 35	)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable	26		33
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	( 17	)	( 19	)
Taxes accrued	( 18	)	( 41	)
Other current liabilities	( 13	)	3
Other assets	( 34	)	20
Other liabilities	14		( 21	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	517		466
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	( 443	)	( 416	)
Purchases of debt and equity securities	( 14	)	( 34	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities	11		13
Other	( 21	)	2
Net cash used in investing activities	( 467	)	( 435	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt	( 60	)	—
Notes payable to affiliated companies	( 2	)	60
Distributions to parent	—		( 75	)
Other	—		( 1	)
Net cash used in financing activities	( 62	)	( 16	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	( 12	)	15
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	24		9
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 12		$ 24
Supplemental Disclosures:
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures	$ 84		$ 62

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2018 and 2019
	Member's
(in millions)	Equity
Balance at March 31, 2018	$ 4,221
Net income	98
Distributions to parent	( 75	)
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 4,244
Balance at March 31, 2019	$ 4,449
Net income	97
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 4,546
	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2018 and 2019
	Member's
(in millions)	Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$ 4,121
Net income	198
Distributions to parent	( 75	)
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 4,244
Balance at December 31, 2018	$ 4,339
Net income	207
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 4,546

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		2019	2018
Operating Revenues	$ 209		$ 215		$ 788	$ 768
Operating Expenses
Cost of natural gas	65		74		338	333
Operation, maintenance and other	83		85		163	167
Depreciation and amortization	42		39		84	78
Property and other taxes	13		12		25	24
Total operating expenses	203		210		610	602
Operating Income	6		5		178	166
Other Income and Expenses, net	6		4		12	9
Interest Expense	21		20		43	41
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes	( 9	)	( 11	)	147	134
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense	( 2	)	( 3	)	32	32
Net (Loss) Income and Comprehensive (Loss) Income	$ ( 7	)	$ ( 8	)	$ 115	$ 102

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current Assets
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2 at 2019 and 2018)	$ 100		$ 266
Receivables from affiliated companies	17		22
Notes receivable from affiliated companies	16		—
Inventory	33		70
Regulatory assets	30		54
Other	57		19
Total current assets	253		431
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost	7,966		7,486
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 1,620	)	( 1,575	)
Net property, plant and equipment	6,346		5,911
Other Noncurrent Assets
Goodwill	49		49
Regulatory assets	280		303
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net	26		—
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates	81		64
Other	60		52
Total other noncurrent assets	496		468
Total Assets	$ 7,095		$ 6,810
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 156		$ 203
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	52		38
Notes payable to affiliated companies	—		198
Taxes accrued	23		84
Interest accrued	33		31
Current maturities of long-term debt	—		350
Regulatory liabilities	67		37
Other	62		58
Total current liabilities	393		999
Long-Term Debt	2,384		1,788
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes	593		551
Asset retirement obligations	19		19
Regulatory liabilities	1,174		1,181
Operating lease liabilities	25		—
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	6		4
Other	145		177
Total other noncurrent liabilities	1,962		1,932
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Common stock, no par value: 100 shares authorized and outstanding at 2019 and 2018	1,310		1,160
Retained earnings	1,046		931
Total equity	2,356		2,091
Total Liabilities and Equity	$ 7,095		$ 6,810

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 115		$ 102
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	85		79
Deferred income taxes	40		4
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates	( 4	)	( 3	)
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs	( 5	)	( 2	)
Provision for rate refunds	9		27
(Increase) decrease in
Receivables	168		166
Receivables from affiliated companies	5		( 4	)
Inventory	37		28
Other current assets	( 17	)	74
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable	( 70	)	( 32	)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	14		( 12	)
Taxes accrued	( 61	)	4
Other current liabilities	10		28
Other assets	( 5	)	2
Other liabilities	( 1	)	( 2	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	320		459
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	( 480	)	( 327	)
Contributions to equity method investments	( 16	)	—
Notes receivable from affiliated companies	( 16	)	( 77	)
Other	( 6	)	( 2	)
Net cash used in investing activities	( 518	)	( 406	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt	596		—
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt	( 350	)	—
Notes payable to affiliated companies	( 198	)	( 364	)
Capital contributions from parent	150		300
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	198		( 64	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	—		( 11	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	—		19
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ —		$ 8
Supplemental Disclosures:
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures	$ 115		$ 73

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019 — Common	Retained		Total
(in millions)	Stock	Earnings		Equity
Balance at March 31, 2018	$ 860	$ 912		$ 1,772
Net loss	—	( 8	)	( 8	)
Contribution from parent	300	—		300
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 1,160	$ 904		$ 2,064
Balance at March 31, 2019	$ 1,160	$ 1,053		$ 2,213
Net loss	—	( 7	)	( 7	)
Contribution from parent	150	—		150
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 1,310	$ 1,046		$ 2,356
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2019
	Common	Retained		Total
(in millions)	Stock	Earnings		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2017	$ 860	$ 802		$ 1,662
Net income	—	102		102
Contribution from parent	300	—		300
Balance at June 30, 2018	$ 1,160	$ 904		$ 2,064
Balance at December 31, 2018	$ 1,160	$ 931		$ 2,091
Net income	—	115		115
Contribution from parent	150	—		150
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 1,310	$ 1,046		$ 2,356

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Index to Combined Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The unaudited notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements that follow are a combined presentation. The following list indicates the registrants to which the footnotes apply.

Registrant	Applicable Notes — 1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18
Duke Energy	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•
Duke Energy Carolinas	•	•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•
Progress Energy	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•
Duke Energy Progress	•	•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•
Duke Energy Florida	•	•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•
Duke Energy Ohio	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•		•	•	•
Duke Energy Indiana	•	•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•	•	•	•		•	•	•
Piedmont	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•		•		•		•	•	•

Tables within the notes may not sum across due to (i) Progress Energy's consolidation of Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and other subsidiaries that are not registrants and (ii) subsidiaries that are not registrants but included in the consolidated Duke Energy balances.

1 . ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not include all information and notes required by GAAP for annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Duke Energy Registrants’ combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 .

The information in these combined notes relates to each of the Duke Energy Registrants as noted in the Index to Combined Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. However, none of the registrants make any representations as to information related solely to Duke Energy or the subsidiaries of Duke Energy other than itself.

These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, in the opinion of the respective companies’ management, reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present the financial position and results of operations of each of the Duke Energy Registrants. Amounts reported in Duke Energy’s interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and each of the Subsidiary Registrants’ interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income are not necessarily indicative of amounts expected for the respective annual periods due to effects of seasonal temperature variations on energy consumption, regulatory rulings, timing of maintenance on electric generating units, changes in mark-to-market valuations, changing commodity prices and other factors.

In preparing financial statements that conform to GAAP, management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include, after eliminating intercompany transactions and balances, the accounts of the Duke Energy Registrants and subsidiaries or VIEs where the respective Duke Energy Registrants have control. See Note 13 for additional information on VIEs. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements also reflect the Duke Energy Registrants’ proportionate share of certain jointly owned generation and transmission facilities.

NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

Duke Energy maintains a controlling financial interest in certain less-than wholly owned non-regulated subsidiaries. As a result, Duke Energy consolidates these subsidiaries and presents the third-party investors' portion of Duke Energy's net income (loss), net assets and comprehensive income (loss) as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest is included as a component of equity on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Several operating agreements of Duke Energy's subsidiaries with noncontrolling interest are subject to allocations of earnings, tax attributes and cash flows in accordance with contractual agreements that vary throughout the lives of the subsidiaries. Therefore, Duke Energy and the other investors' (the owners) interests in the subsidiaries are not fixed, and the subsidiaries apply the HLBV method in allocating book profit or loss and other comprehensive income or loss (all measured on a pretax basis) to the owners. The HLBV method measures the amounts that each owner would hypothetically claim at each balance sheet reporting date, including tax benefits realized by the owners, upon a hypothetical liquidation of the subsidiary at the net book value of its underlying assets. The change in the amount that each owner would hypothetically receive at the reporting date compared to the amount it would have received on the previous reporting date represents the amount of profit or loss allocated to each owner for the reporting period. During the second quarter of 2019, Duke Energy’s North Rosamond solar farm commenced commercial operations resulting in the allocation of losses to the noncontrolling tax equity members of $ 74 million utilizing the HLBV method.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Other operating agreements of Duke Energy's subsidiaries with noncontrolling interest allocate profit and loss based on their pro rata shares of the ownership interest in the respective subsidiary. Therefore, Duke Energy allocates net income or loss and other comprehensive income or loss of these subsidiaries to the owners based on their pro rata shares .

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH

Duke Energy, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Florida have restricted cash balances related primarily to collateral assets, escrow deposits and VIEs. See Note 13 for additional information. Restricted cash amounts are included in Other within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table presents the components of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
			Duke			Duke
	Duke	Progress	Energy	Duke	Progress	Energy
	Energy	Energy	Florida	Energy	Energy	Florida
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 336	$ 51	$ 16	$ 442	$ 67	$ 36
Other	106	31	31	141	39	39
Other Noncurrent Assets
Other	39	38	—	8	6	—
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$ 481	$ 120	$ 47	$ 591	$ 112	$ 75

INVENTORY

Provisions for inventory write-offs were not material at June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 . The components of inventory are presented in the tables below.

	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Materials and supplies	$ 2,252	$ 749	$ 1,036	$ 709	$ 327	$ 76	$ 323	$ 3
Coal	624	235	234	160	74	17	139	—
Natural gas, oil and other fuel	313	41	210	111	98	31	1	30
Total inventory	$ 3,189	$ 1,025	$ 1,480	$ 980	$ 499	$ 124	$ 463	$ 33

	December 31, 2018	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Materials and supplies	$ 2,238	$ 731	$ 1,049	$ 734	$ 315	$ 84	$ 312	$ 2
Coal	491	175	192	106	86	14	109	—
Natural gas, oil and other fuel	355	42	218	114	103	28	1	68
Total inventory	$ 3,084	$ 948	$ 1,459	$ 954	$ 504	$ 126	$ 422	$ 70

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Except as noted below, the new accounting standards adopted for 2018 and 2019 had no material impact on the presentation or results of operations, cash flows or financial position of the Duke Energy Registrants.

Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued revised accounting guidance for leases. The core principle of this guidance is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet. This resulted in a material impact on the presentation for the statement of financial position of the Duke Energy Registrants for the period ended June 30, 2019 , and an immaterial impact to the Duke Energy Registrants' results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 , and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2019 .

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Duke Energy elected the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2019. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated. For adoption, Duke Energy has elected to apply the following practical expedients:

Practical Expedient	Description
Package of transition practical expedients (for leases commenced prior to adoption date and must be adopted as a package)	Do not need to 1) reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are/or contain leases, 2) reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and 3) reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases.
Short-term lease expedient (elect by class of underlying asset)	Elect as an accounting policy to not apply the recognition requirements to short-term leases by asset class.
Lease and non-lease components (elect by class of underlying asset)	Elect as an accounting policy to not separate non-lease components from lease components and instead account for each lease and associated non-lease component as a single lease component by asset class.
Hindsight expedient (when determining lease term)	Elect to use hindsight to determine the lease term.
Existing and expired land easements not previously accounted for as leases	Elect to not evaluate existing or expired easements under the new guidance and carry forward current accounting treatment.
Comparative reporting requirements for initial adoption	Elect to apply transition requirements at adoption date, recognize cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings in period of adoption and not apply the new requirements to comparative periods, including disclosures.
Lessor expedient (elect by class of underlying asset)	Elect as an accounting policy to aggregate non-lease components with the related lease component when specified conditions are met by asset class. Account for the combined component based on its predominant characteristic (revenue or operating lease).

Duke Energy evaluated the financial statement impact of adopting the standard and monitored industry implementation issues. Under agreements considered leases, where Duke Energy is the lessee, for the use of certain aircraft, space on communication towers, industrial equipment, fleet vehicles, fuel transportation (barges and railcars), land, office space and PPAs are now recognized on the balance sheet. The Duke Energy Registrants did not have a material change to the financial statements from the adoption of the new standard for contracts where it is the lessor. See Note 5 for further information.

No new accounting standards, issued but not yet adopted, are expected to have a material impact on the Duke Energy Registrants as of June 30, 2019 .

2 . BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Duke Energy

Duke Energy's segment structure includes the following segments: Electric Utilities and Infrastructure, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure and Commercial Renewables. The Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment primarily includes Duke Energy's regulated electric utilities in the Carolinas, Florida and the Midwest. The Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment includes Piedmont, Duke Energy's natural gas local distribution companies in Ohio and Kentucky, and Duke Energy's natural gas storage and midstream pipeline investments.

The Commercial Renewables segment is primarily comprised of nonregulated utility-scale wind and solar generation assets located throughout the U.S. On April 24, 2019, Duke Energy executed an agreement to sell a minority interest in a portion of certain renewable assets. The portion of Duke Energy’s commercial renewables energy portfolio to be sold includes 49 percent of 37 operating wind, solar and battery storage assets and 33 percent of 11 operating solar assets across the U.S. The sale will result in pretax proceeds to Duke Energy of $ 415 million . Duke Energy will retain control of these assets, and, therefore, no gain or loss is expected to be recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations upon closing of the transaction. The sale is subject to customary closing conditions, including approvals from the FERC, the Public Utility Commission of Texas and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. Duke Energy received FERC approval on July 26, 2019. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2019.

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, Duke Energy evaluated recoverability of its renewable merchant plants principally located in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas West market due to declining market pricing and declining long-term forecasted energy and capacity prices, primarily driven by lower forecasted natural gas prices. Duke Energy determined that the assets were not impaired because the carrying value of $ 160 million approximates the aggregate estimated future cash flows and further testing was not required. A continued decline in pricing would likely result in a future impairment.

The remainder of Duke Energy’s operations is presented as Other, which is primarily comprised of interest expense on holding company debt, unallocated corporate costs, Duke Energy’s wholly owned captive insurance company, Bison, and Duke Energy's interest in NMC.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Business segment information is presented in the following tables. Segment assets presented exclude intercompany assets.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
	Electric	Gas		Total
	Utilities and	Utilities and	Commercial	Reportable
(in millions)	Infrastructure	Infrastructure	Renewables	Segments	Other		Eliminations		Total
Unaffiliated revenues	$ 5,467	$ 282	$ 118	$ 5,867	$ 6		$ —		$ 5,873
Intersegment revenues	8	24	—	32	19		( 51	)	—
Total revenues	$ 5,475	$ 306	$ 118	$ 5,899	$ 25		$ ( 51	)	$ 5,873
Segment income (loss)	$ 809	$ 40	$ 86	$ 935	$ ( 115	)	$ —		$ 820
Add back noncontrolling interests (a)									( 84	)
Add back preferred stock dividend									12
Net income									$ 748
Segment assets	$ 131,640	$ 12,943	$ 4,870	$ 149,453	$ 3,815		$ 181		$ 153,449

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Electric	Gas		Total
	Utilities and	Utilities and	Commercial	Reportable
(in millions)	Infrastructure	Infrastructure	Renewables	Segments	Other		Eliminations		Total
Unaffiliated revenues	$ 5,215	$ 294	$ 119	$ 5,628	$ 15		$ —		$ 5,643
Intersegment revenues	8	24	—	32	17		( 49	)	—
Total revenues	$ 5,223	$ 318	$ 119	$ 5,660	$ 32		$ ( 49	)	$ 5,643
Segment income (loss) (b)(c)	$ 575	$ 28	$ 38	$ 641	$ ( 136	)	$ —		$ 505
Add back noncontrolling interests									2
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax									( 5	)
Net income									$ 502

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
	Electric	Gas		Total
	Utilities and	Utilities and	Commercial	Reportable
(in millions)	Infrastructure	Infrastructure	Renewables	Segments	Other		Eliminations		Total
Unaffiliated revenues	$ 10,788	$ 1,014	$ 224	$ 12,026	$ 10		$ —		$ 12,036
Intersegment revenues	16	48	—	64	36		( 100	)	—
Total revenues	$ 10,804	$ 1,062	$ 224	$ 12,090	$ 46		$ ( 100	)	$ 12,036
Segment income (loss)	$ 1,559	$ 266	$ 99	$ 1,924	$ ( 204	)	$ —		$ 1,720
Add back noncontrolling interests (a)									( 91	)
Add back preferred stock dividend									12
Net income									$ 1,641

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Electric	Gas		Total
	Utilities and	Utilities and	Commercial	Reportable
(in millions)	Infrastructure	Infrastructure	Renewables	Segments	Other		Eliminations		Total
Unaffiliated revenues	$ 10,530	$ 997	$ 220	$ 11,747	$ 31		$ —		$ 11,778
Intersegment revenues	16	48	—	64	36		( 100	)	—
Total revenues	$ 10,546	$ 1,045	$ 220	$ 11,811	$ 67		$ ( 100	)	$ 11,778
Segment income (loss) (b)(c)(d)(e)	$ 1,325	$ 144	$ 58	$ 1,527	$ ( 402	)	$ —		$ 1,125
Add back noncontrolling interests									4
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax									( 5	)
Net income									$ 1,124

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BUSINESS SEGMENTS

(a) Includes the allocation of losses to noncontrolling tax equity members . See Note 1 for additional information.

(b) Electric Utilities and Infrastructure includes regulatory and legislative impairment charges related to rate case orders, settlements or other actions of regulators or legislative bodies. See Note 3 for additional information.

(d) Gas Utilities and Infrastructure includes an impairment of the investment in Constitution. See Note 3 for additional information.

(e) Other includes the loss on the sale of Beckjord described below and a valuation allowance recorded against the AMT credits.

In February 2018, Duke Energy sold Beckjord, a nonregulated facility retired during 2014, and recorded a pretax loss of $ 106 million within Gains (Losses) on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net and $ 1 million within Operation, maintenance and other on Duke Energy's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018 . The sale included the transfer of coal ash basins and other real property and indemnification from any and all potential future claims related to the property, whether arising under environmental laws or otherwise.

Duke Energy Ohio

Duke Energy Ohio has two reportable segments, Electric Utilities and Infrastructure and Gas Utilities and Infrastructure. The remainder of Duke Energy Ohio's operations is presented as Other.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 — Electric	Gas	Total
	Utilities and	Utilities and	Reportable
(in millions)	Infrastructure	Infrastructure	Segments	Other		Total
Total revenues	$ 336	$ 97	$ 433	$ —		$ 433
Segment income/Net (loss) income	$ 31	$ 17	$ 48	$ ( 1	)	$ 47
Segment assets	$ 5,914	$ 2,948	$ 8,862	$ 27		$ 8,889

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 — Electric	Gas	Total
	Utilities and	Utilities and	Reportable
(in millions)	Infrastructure	Infrastructure	Segments	Other		Total
Total revenues	$ 346	$ 103	$ 449	$ 10		$ 459
Segment income/Net (loss) income	$ 39	$ 18	$ 57	$ ( 11	)	$ 46

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 — Electric	Gas	Total
	Utilities and	Utilities and	Reportable
(in millions)	Infrastructure	Infrastructure	Segments	Other		Total
Total revenues	$ 691	$ 273	$ 964	$ —		$ 964
Segment income/Net (loss) income	$ 67	$ 52	$ 119	$ ( 3	)	$ 116

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 — Electric	Gas	Total
	Utilities and	Utilities and	Reportable
(in millions)	Infrastructure	Infrastructure	Segments	Other		Total
Total revenues	$ 682	$ 277	$ 959	$ 24		$ 983
Segment income/Net (loss) income (a)	$ 72	$ 52	$ 124	$ ( 103	)	$ 21

(a) Other includes the loss on the sale of Beckjord described above.

3 . REGULATORY MATTERS

RATE-RELATED INFORMATION

The NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC, IURC, PUCO, TPUC and KPSC approve rates for retail electric and natural gas services within their states. The FERC approves rates for electric sales to wholesale customers served under cost-based rates (excluding Ohio and Indiana), as well as sales of transmission service. The FERC also regulates certification and siting of new interstate natural gas pipeline projects.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress

Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego Deferral Filings

On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed with the NCUC petitions for approval to defer the incremental costs incurred in connection with the response to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego to a regulatory asset for recovery in the next base rate case. The NCUC issued an order requesting comments on the deferral positions. On March 5, 2019, the North Carolina Public Staff (Public Staff) filed comments. On April 2, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed reply comments, which included revised estimates of approximately $ 553 million in incremental operation and maintenance expenses ( $ 171 million and $ 382 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively) and approximately $ 96 million in capital costs ( $ 20 million and $ 76 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively). Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter. Duke Energy Progress filed a similar request with the PSCSC on January 11, 2019, which also included a request for the continuation of prior deferrals requested for ice storms and Hurricane Matthew, and on January 30, 2019, the PSCSC issued a directive approving the deferral request, followed by an order issued on February 21, 2019. On March 15, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a request with FERC requesting permission to defer transmission-related storm costs that would be charged to wholesale transmission customers through Duke Energy Progress' Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) and to recover those costs from wholesale transmission customers over a three-year recovery period. FERC accepted the filing on May 14, 2019, which allows Duke Energy Progress to proceed with the proposed cost deferral and recovery.

Duke Energy Carolinas

2017 North Carolina Rate Case

On August 25, 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas filed an application with the NCUC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $ 647 million , which represented an approximate 13.6 percent increase in annual base revenues. The rate increase was driven by capital investments subsequent to the previous base rate case, including the W.S. Lee CC, grid improvement projects, AMI, investments in customer service technologies, costs of complying with CCR regulations and the Coal Ash Act and recovery of costs related to licensing and development of the Lee Nuclear Station.

On February 28, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas and the Public Staff filed an Agreement and Stipulation of Partial Settlement resolving certain portions of the proceeding. Terms of the settlement included a return on equity of 9.9 percent and a capital structure of 52 percent equity and 48 percent debt. As a result of the settlement, Duke Energy Carolinas recorded a pretax charge of approximately $ 4 million in the first quarter of 2018 to Operation, maintenance and other on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On June 22, 2018, the NCUC issued an order approving the Stipulation of Partial Settlement and requiring a revenue reduction. As a result of the order, Duke Energy Carolinas recorded a pretax charge of approximately $ 150 million in the second quarter of 2018 to Impairment charges and Operation, maintenance and other on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The charge was primarily related to the denial of a return on the Lee Nuclear Project and the assessment of a $ 70 million management penalty by reducing the annual recovery of deferred coal ash costs by $ 14 million per year over a five-year recovery period. On July 27, 2018, NCUC approved Duke Energy Carolinas' compliance filing. As a result, revised customer rates were effective on August 1, 2018.

On July 20, 2018, the North Carolina Attorney General filed a Notice of Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court from the June 22, 2018, Order Accepting Stipulation, Deciding Contested Issues and Requiring Revenue Reduction issued by the NCUC. The Attorney General contends the commission’s order should be reversed and remanded, as it is in excess of the commission’s statutory authority; affected by errors of law; unsupported by competent, material and substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted; and arbitrary or capricious. The Sierra Club, North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association, North Carolina Justice Center, North Carolina Housing Coalition, Natural Resource Defense Council and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy also filed Notices of Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court. On August 8, 2018, the Public Staff filed a Notice of Cross Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court, which contends the commission’s June 22, 2018, order should be reversed and remanded, as it is affected by errors of law, and is unsupported by substantial evidence with regard to the commission’s failure to consider substantial evidence of coal ash related environmental violations. On November 29, 2018, the North Carolina Attorney General's Office filed a motion with the North Carolina Supreme Court requesting the court consolidate the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress appeals and enter an order adopting the parties’ proposed briefing schedule as set out in the filing. On November 29, 2018, the North Carolina Supreme Court adopted a schedule for briefing set forth in the motion to consolidate the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress appeals. Appellant’s brief was filed on April 26, 2019. The Appellee response briefs are due on September 25, 2019. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

2018 South Carolina Rate Case

On November 8, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed an application with the PSCSC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $ 168 million , which represents an approximate 10.0 percent increase in retail revenues. The request for rate increase was driven by capital investments and environmental compliance progress made by Duke Energy Carolinas since its previous rate case, including the further implementation of Duke Energy Carolinas’ generation modernization program, which consists of retiring, replacing and upgrading generation plants, investments in customer service technologies and continued investments in base work to maintain its transmission and distribution systems. The request included net tax benefits resulting from the Tax Act of $ 66 million to reflect the change in ongoing tax expense, primarily from the reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35 to 21 percent. The request also included $ 46 million to return EDIT resulting from the federal tax rate change and deferred revenues since January 2018 related to the change and benefits of $ 17 million from a reduction in North Carolina state income taxes allocable to South Carolina (EDIT Rider).

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

Duke Energy Carolinas also requested approval of its proposed Grid Improvement Plan (GIP), adjustments to its Prepaid Advantage Program and a variety of accounting orders related to ongoing costs for environmental compliance, including recovery over a five -year period of $ 242 million of deferred coal ash related compliance costs, grid investments between rate changes, incremental depreciation expense, a result of new depreciation rates from the depreciation study approved in the 2017 North Carolina Rate Case above, and the balance of development costs associated with the cancellation of the Lee Nuclear Project. Finally, Duke Energy Carolinas sought approval to establish a reserve and accrual for end-of-life nuclear costs for nuclear fuel and materials and supplies. On March 8, 2019, the ORS moved to establish a new and separate hearing docket to review and consider the GIP proposed by Duke Energy Carolinas. Subsequently, on March 12, 2019, the ORS and Duke Energy Carolinas executed a Stipulation resolving the ORS’s motion. The Stipulation provides that costs incurred after January 1, 2019, for the GIP will be deferred with a return, subject to evaluation in a future rate proceeding, and that Duke Energy Carolinas will refile for consideration of the GIP in a new docket for resolution by January 1, 2020. The Stipulation was approved by the PSCSC on June 19, 2019.

After hearings in March 2019, the PSCSC issued an order on May 21, 2019, which included a return on equity of 9.5 percent and a capital structure of 53 percent equity and 47 percent debt. The order also included the following material components:

• Approval of cancellation of the Lee Nuclear Project, with Duke Energy Carolinas maintaining the Combined Operating License;

• Approval of recovery of $ 125 million (South Carolina retail portion) of Lee Nuclear Project development costs (including AFUDC through December 2017) over a 12 -year period, but denial of a return on the deferred balance of costs;

• Approval of recovery of $ 96 million of coal ash costs over a five-year period with a return at Duke Energy Carolinas' WACC;

• Denial of recovery of $ 115 million of certain coal ash costs deemed to be related to the Coal Ash Act and incremental to the federal CCR rule;

• Approval of a $ 66 million decrease to base rates to reflect the change in ongoing tax expense, primarily the reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35 to 21 percent;

• Approval of a $ 45 million decrease through the EDIT Rider to return EDIT resulting from the federal tax rate change and deferred revenues since January 2018 related to the change, to be returned in accordance with the Average Rate Assumption Method (ARAM) for protected EDIT, over a 20-year period for unprotected EDIT associated with Property, Plant and Equipment, over a five-year period for unprotected EDIT not associated with Property, Plant and Equipment and over a five-year period for the deferred revenues; and

• Approval of a $ 17 million decrease through the EDIT Rider related to reductions in the North Carolina state income tax rate from 6.9 to 2.5 percent to be returned over a five-year period.

As a result of the May 21, 2019 order, revised customer rates were effective June 1, 2019. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a Petition for Rehearing or Reconsideration of that order contending substantial rights of Duke Energy Carolinas were prejudiced by unlawful, arbitrary and capricious rulings by the commission on certain issues presented in the proceeding. On June 19, 2019, the PSCSC issued a Directive denying Duke Energy Carolinas' request to rehear or reconsider the commission's rulings on certain issues presented in the proceeding including coal ash remediation and disposal costs, return on equity and the recovery of a return on deferred operation and maintenance expenses. Duke Energy Carolinas awaits the order on reconsideration detailing the commission's decision. Based upon legal analysis and Duke Energy Carolinas' intention to file a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court within 30 days of receipt of the order, Duke Energy Carolinas has not recorded an adjustment for its deferred coal ash costs. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

FERC Formula Rate Matter

On July 31, 2017, PMPA filed a complaint with FERC alleging that Duke Energy Carolinas misapplied the formula rate under the PPA between the parties by including in its rates amortization expense associated with regulatory assets and recorded in a certain account without FERC approval. On February 15, 2018, FERC issued an order ruling in favor of PMPA and ordered Duke Energy Carolinas to refund to PMPA all amounts improperly collected under the PPA. Duke Energy Carolinas has issued to PMPA and similarly situated wholesale customers refunds of approximately $ 25 million . FERC also set the matter for settlement and hearing. PMPA and other customers filed a protest to Duke Energy Carolinas' refund report claiming that the refunds are inadequate in that (1) Duke Energy Carolinas invoked the limitations periods in the contracts to limit the time period for which the refunds were paid and the customers disagree that this limitation applies, and (2) Duke Energy Carolinas refunded only amounts recovered through a certain account and the customers have asserted that the order applies to all regulatory assets. On July 3, 2018, FERC issued an order accepting Duke Energy Carolinas' refund report and ruling that these two claims are outside the scope of FERC's February order. The settlement agreements and revised formula rates for all parties to the proceeding were filed on December 28, 2018. On April 2, 2019, FERC issued an order approving the settlement agreement as filed. Since then, Duke Energy Carolinas has implemented the terms of the settlement in rates with all wholesale customers, including non-intervening customers. On July 25, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas received FERC approval for the accounting treatment requested for certain assets included in the settlement agreements. This is the final approval needed from FERC and concludes this proceeding.

Sale of Hydroelectric (Hydro) Plants

In May 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas entered an agreement for the sale of five hydro plants with a combined 18.7-MW generation capacity in the Western Carolinas region to Northbrook Energy. The completion of the transaction is subject to approval from FERC for the four FERC-licensed plants, as well as other state regulatory agencies and is contingent upon regulatory approval from the NCUC and PSCSC to defer the total estimated loss on the sale of approximately $ 40 million . On July 5, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed with NCUC for approval of the sale of the five hydro plants to Northbrook, to transfer the CPCNs for the four North Carolina hydro plants and to establish a regulatory asset for the North Carolina retail portion of the difference between sales proceeds and net book value. On June 5, 2019, the NCUC issued an order approving the transfer of the hydro plants from Duke Energy Carolinas to Northbrook, granting deferral accounting and denying the Public Staff's motion for reconsideration.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

On August 28, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed with PSCSC an Application for Approval of Transfer and Sale of Hydroelectric Generation Facilities, Acceptance for Filing of a Power Purchase Agreement and an Accounting Order to Establish a Regulatory Asset. On September 10, 2018, the ORS provided a letter to the commission stating its position on the application and on September 18, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas requested this matter be carried over to allow Duke Energy Carolinas time to discuss certain accounting issues with the ORS. At their June 26, 2019, agenda meeting, the PSCSC voted to approve the transfer and sale subject to the recommendation of the ORS that the issuance of an Accounting Order will not preclude the ORS, the commission or any other party from addressing the reasonableness of these costs, any return sought and including any carrying costs in the next rate case.

On August 9, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas and Northbrook filed a joint Application for Transfer of Licenses with the FERC. On December 27, 2018, the FERC issued its Order Approving Transfer of Licenses (“Order”) for the four FERC-licensed hydro plants. On January 18, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Northbrook Carolina Hydro II, LLC requested a six-month extension of time to comply with the requirement of the Order that Northbrook submit to FERC certified copies of all instruments of conveyance and signed acceptance sheets within 60 days of the date of the Order. On February 14, 2019, FERC issued an order granting extensions until August 26, 2019, to comply with the requirements of the December 27, 2018 Order.

The closing is expected to occur in 2019. After closing, Duke Energy Carolinas will purchase all the capacity and energy generated by these facilities at the avoided cost for five years through power purchase agreements. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Duke Energy Progress

2017 North Carolina Rate Case

On June 1, 2017, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the NCUC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $ 477 million , which represented an approximate 14.9 percent increase in annual base revenues. Subsequent to the filing, Duke Energy Progress adjusted the requested amount to $ 420 million , representing an approximate 13 percent increase. The rate increase was driven by capital investments subsequent to the previous base rate case, costs of complying with CCR regulations and the Coal Ash Act, costs relating to storm recovery, investments in customer service technologies and recovery of costs associated with renewable purchased power.

On November 22, 2017, Duke Energy Progress and the Public Staff filed an Agreement and Stipulation of Partial Settlement resolving certain portions of the proceeding. Terms of the settlement included a return on equity of 9.9 percent and a capital structure of 52 percent equity and 48 percent debt. On February 23, 2018, the NCUC issued an order approving the stipulation.

The order also impacted certain amounts that were similarly recorded on Duke Energy Carolinas' Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result of the order, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas recorded pretax charges of $ 68 million and $ 14 million , respectively, in the first quarter of 2018 to Impairment charges, Operation, maintenance and other and Interest Expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Revised customer rates became effective on March 16, 2018.

On May 15, 2018, the Public Staff filed a Notice of Cross Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court from the NCUC's February 23, 2018, Order. The Public Staff contends the NCUC’s order should be reversed and remanded, as it is affected by errors of law, and is unsupported by competent, material and substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted. The North Carolina Attorney General and Sierra Club also filed Notices of Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court from the February 23, 2018, Order. On November 29, 2018, the North Carolina Attorney General's Office filed a motion with the North Carolina Supreme Court requesting the court consolidate the Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas appeals and enter an order adopting the parties’ proposed briefing schedule as set out in the filing. Appellant’s brief was filed on April 26, 2019. The Appellee response briefs are due on September 25, 2019. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

2018 South Carolina Rate Case

On November 8, 2018, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the PSCSC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $ 59 million , which represents an approximate 10.3 percent increase in annual base revenues. The rate increase is driven by capital investments and environmental compliance progress made by Duke Energy Progress since its previous rate case, including the further implementation of Duke Energy Progress’ generation modernization program, which consists of retiring, replacing and upgrading generation plants, investments in customer service technologies and continued investments in base work to maintain its transmission and distribution systems. The request included a decrease resulting from the Tax Act of $ 17 million to reflect the change in ongoing tax expense, primarily the reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35 to 21 percent. The request also included $ 10 million to return EDIT resulting from the federal tax rate change and deferred revenues since January 2018 related to the change (EDIT Rider) and a $ 12 million increase due to the expiration of EDITs related to reductions in North Carolina state income taxes allocable to South Carolina.

Duke Energy Progress also requested approval of its proposed GIP, approval of a Prepaid Advantage Program and a variety of accounting orders related to ongoing costs for environmental compliance, including recovery over a five -year period of $ 51 million of deferred coal ash related compliance costs, AMI deployment, grid investments between rate changes and regulatory asset treatment related to the retirement of a generating plant located in Asheville, North Carolina. Finally, Duke Energy Progress sought approval to establish a reserve and accrual for end-of-life nuclear costs for materials and supplies and nuclear fuel. On March 8, 2019, the ORS moved to establish a new and separate hearing docket to review and consider the GIP proposed by Duke Energy Progress. Subsequently, on March 12, 2019, the ORS and Duke Energy Carolinas executed a Stipulation resolving the ORS’s motion, and Duke Energy Progress agreed to the Stipulation, as did other parties in the rate case. The Stipulation provides that costs incurred after January 1, 2019, for the GIP will be deferred with a return, with all costs subject to evaluation in a future rate proceeding, and that Duke Energy Progress will refile for consideration of the GIP in a new docket for resolution by January 1, 2020. The Stipulation was approved by the PSCSC on June 19, 2019.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

After hearings in April 2019, the PSCSC issued an order on May 21, 2019, which included a return on equity of 9.5 percent and a capital structure of 53 percent equity and 47 percent debt. The order also included the following material components:

• Approval of recovery of $ 4 million of coal ash costs over a five-year period with a return at Duke Energy Progress' WACC;

• Denial of recovery of $ 65 million of certain coal ash costs deemed to be related to the Coal Ash Act and incremental to the federal CCR rule;

• Approval of a $ 17 million decrease to base rates to reflect the change in ongoing tax expense, primarily the reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35 to 21 percent;

• Approval of a $ 12 million decrease through the EDIT Tax Savings Rider resulting from the federal tax rate change and deferred revenues since January 2018 related to the change, to be returned in accordance with ARAM for protected EDIT, over a 20-year period for unprotected EDIT associated with Property, Plant and Equipment, over a five-year period for unprotected EDIT not associated with Property, Plant and Equipment and over a three-year period for the deferred revenues; and

• Approval of a $ 12 million increase due to the expiration of EDIT related to reductions in the North Carolina state income tax rate from 6.9 to 2.5 percent.

As a result of the order, revised customer rates were effective June 1, 2019. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a Petition for Rehearing or Reconsideration of that order contending substantial rights of Duke Energy Progress were prejudiced by unlawful, arbitrary and capricious rulings by the commission on certain issues presented in the proceeding. On June 19, 2019, the PSCSC issued a Directive denying Duke Energy Progress' request to rehear or reconsider the commission's rulings on certain issues presented in the proceeding including coal ash remediation and disposal costs, return on equity and the recovery of a return on deferred operation and maintenance expenses, but allowing additional litigation-related costs. As a result of the Directive allowing litigation-related costs, customer rates were revised effective July 1, 2019. Duke Energy Progress awaits the order on reconsideration detailing the commission's decision. Based upon legal analysis and Duke Energy Progress' intention to file a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court within 30 days of receipt of the order, Duke Energy Progress has not recorded an adjustment for its deferred coal ash costs. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Western Carolinas Modernization Plan

On November 4, 2015, Duke Energy Progress announced a Western Carolinas Modernization Plan, which included retirement of the existing Asheville coal-fired plant, the construction of two 280‑MW combined-cycle natural gas plants having dual-fuel capability, with the option to build a third natural gas simple cycle unit in 2023 based upon the outcome of initiatives to reduce the region's power demand. The plan also included upgrades to existing transmission lines and substations, installation of solar generation and a pilot battery storage project. These investments will be made within the next seven years. Duke Energy Progress worked with the local natural gas distribution company to upgrade an existing natural gas pipeline to serve the natural gas plant. The lease became effective on March 2, 2019.

On March 28, 2016, the NCUC issued an order approving a CPCN for the new combined-cycle natural gas plants, but denying the CPCN for the contingent simple cycle unit without prejudice to Duke Energy Progress to refile for approval in the future. On March 28, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed an annual progress report for the construction of the combined-cycle plants with the NCUC, with an estimated cost of $ 893 million . Site preparation activities for the combined-cycle plants are complete and construction of these plants began in 2017, with an expected in-service date in late 2019.

On October 8, 2018, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the NCUC for a CPCN to construct the Hot Springs Microgrid Solar and Battery Storage Facility. On March 22, 2019, Duke Energy Progress and the Public Staff filed a Joint Proposed Order. On May 10, 2019, the NCUC issued an Order Granting Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity with Conditions.

The carrying value of the 376 -MW Asheville coal-fired plant, including associated ash basin closure costs, of $ 284 million and $ 327 million is included in Generation facilities to be retired, net on Duke Energy Progress' Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 , respectively. Duke Energy Progress' request for a regulatory asset at the time of retirement with amortization over a 10 -year period was approved by the NCUC on February 23, 2018.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

Duke Energy Florida

Storm Restoration Cost Recovery

In September 2017, Duke Energy Florida’s service territory suffered significant damage from Hurricane Irma, resulting in approximately 1 million customers experiencing outages. In the fourth quarter of 2017, Duke Energy Florida also incurred preparation costs related to Hurricane Nate. On December 28, 2017, Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC to recover incremental storm restoration costs for Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Nate and to replenish the storm reserve. On February 6, 2018, the FPSC approved a stipulation that would apply tax savings resulting from the Tax Act toward storm costs effective January 2018 in lieu of implementing a storm surcharge. On May 31, 2018, Duke Energy Florida filed a petition for approval of actual storm restoration costs and associated recovery process related to Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Nate. The petition sought the approval for the recovery in the amount of $ 510 million in actual recoverable storm restoration costs, including the replenishment of Duke Energy Florida’s storm reserve of $ 132 million , and the process for recovering these recoverable storm costs. On August 20, 2018, the FPSC approved Duke Energy Florida's unopposed Motion for Continuance filed August 17, 2018, to allow for an evidentiary hearing in this matter. On January 28, 2019, Duke Energy Florida made a supplemental filing to reduce the total storm cost recovery from $ 510 million to $ 508 million . On April 3, 2019, the FPSC issued an Order abating all remaining filing dates. On April 9, 2019, Duke Energy Florida filed an unopposed motion to approve a settlement agreement resolving all outstanding issues in this docket. On June 13, 2019, the FPSC issued its order approving the settlement agreement. The Storm Cost Settlement Agreement obligates Duke Energy Florida to capitalize $ 18 million of storm costs and remove $ 6 million of operating and maintenance expense, thereby reducing the requested storm cost recovery amount by $ 24 million . Duke Energy Florida will also implement process changes with respect to storm cost restoration. At June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, Duke Energy Florida's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets included approximately $ 118 million and $ 217 million , respectively, of recoverable costs under the FPSC's storm rule in Regulatory assets within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets related to storm recovery for Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Nate.

In October 2018, Duke Energy Florida’s service territory suffered damage when Hurricane Michael made landfall as a Category 5 hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 160 mph. The storm caused catastrophic damage from wind and storm surge, particularly from Panama City Beach to Mexico Beach, resulting in widespread outages and significant damage to transmission and distribution facilities across the central Florida Panhandle. In response to Hurricane Michael, Duke Energy Florida restored service to approximately 72,000 customers. Total current estimated incremental operation and maintenance and capital costs are $ 360 million . Approximately $ 82 million and $ 35 million of the costs are included in Net property, plant and equipment on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively. Approximately $ 225 million and $ 165 million of costs are included in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively, representing recoverable costs under the FPSC’s storm rule and Duke Energy Florida's OATT formula rates. Additional costs could be incurred in 2019 related to this fourth quarter 2018 storm.

Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC on April 30, 2019, to recover the retail portion of incremental storm restoration costs for Hurricane Michael. The estimated recovery amount is approximately $ 221 million . On June 11, 2019, the FPSC approved the petition for recovery of incremental storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Michael. The FPSC also approved the stipulation Duke Energy Florida filed, which will allow Duke Energy Florida to use the tax savings resulting from the Tax Act to recover these storm costs in lieu of implementing a storm surcharge. Approved storm costs are currently expected to be fully recovered by approximately year-end 2021. Duke Energy Florida expects to file actual costs for approval with the FPSC in 2019. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Tax Act

Pursuant to Duke Energy Florida's 2017 Settlement, on May 31, 2018, Duke Energy Florida filed a petition related to the Tax Act, which included revenue requirement impacts of annual tax savings of $ 134 million and estimated annual amortization of EDIT of $ 67 million for a total of $ 201 million . Of this amount, $ 50 million would be offset by accelerated depreciation of Crystal River 4 and 5 coal units and an estimated $ 151 million would be offset by Hurricane Irma storm cost recovery as explained in the Storm Restoration Cost Recovery section above. On December 27, 2018, Duke Energy Florida filed actual EDIT balances and amortization based on its 2017 filed tax return. This increased the revenue requirement impact of the amortization of EDIT by $ 4 million , from $ 67 million to $ 71 million , which increased the total storm amortization from $ 151 million to $ 155 million . On January 8, 2019, the FPSC approved a joint motion by Duke Energy Florida and the Office of Public Counsel resolving all stipulated positions. As part of that stipulation, Duke Energy Florida agreed to seek a Private Letter Ruling (PLR) from the IRS on its treatment of cost of removal (COR) as mostly protected by tax normalization rules. If the IRS rules that COR is not protected by tax normalization rules, then Duke Energy Florida will make a final adjustment to the amortization of EDIT and an adjustment to the storm recovery amount retroactive to January 2018. The IRS has communicated that it will not issue individual PLRs on the treatment of COR. Rather, the IRS is drafting a notice that will request comments on a number of issues, including COR, and the IRS plans to issue industrywide guidance on those issues. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Solar Base Rate Adjustment

On July 31, 2018, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC to include in base rates the revenue requirements for its first two solar generation projects, the Hamilton Project and the Columbia Project, as authorized by the 2017 Settlement. The Hamilton Project, which was placed into service on December 22, 2018, has an annual retail revenue requirement of $ 15 million . At its October 30, 2018, Agenda Conference, the FPSC approved the rate increase related to the Hamilton Project to go into effect beginning with the first billing cycle in January 2019 under its file and suspend authority, and revised customer rates became effective in January 2019. The Columbia Project has a projected annual revenue requirement of $ 14 million and a projected in-service date in early 2020; the associated rate increase would take place with the first month’s billing cycle after the Columbia Project goes into service. On April 2, 2019, the commission approved both solar projects as filed.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

On March 25, 2019, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC to include in base rates the revenue requirements for its next wave of solar generation projects, the Trenton, Lake Placid and DeBary Solar Projects, as authorized by the 2017 Settlement. The annual retail revenue requirement for the Trenton and Lake Placid Projects is $ 13 million and $ 8 million , respectively, with projected in-service dates in the fourth quarter of 2019. The DeBary Project has a projected annual revenue requirement of $ 11 million and a projected in-service date in the first quarter of 2020. The associated rate increase would take place with the first month’s billing cycle after each solar generation project goes into service. On July 22, 2019, the FPSC issued an order approving Duke Energy Florida's request.

Crystal River Unit 3 Accelerated Decommissioning Filing

On May 29, 2019, Duke Energy Florida entered into a Decommissioning Services Agreement for the accelerated decommissioning of the Crystal River Unit 3 nuclear power station located in Citrus County, Florida, with ADP CR3, LLC and ADP SF1, LLC, each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Accelerated Decommissioning Partners, LLC, a joint venture between NorthStar Group Services, Inc. and Orano USA LLC. Closing of this Agreement is contingent upon the approval of the NRC and FPSC. If approved, the decommissioning will be accelerated starting in 2020 and continuing through 2027, rather than the expected time frame under SAFSTOR of starting in 2067 and ending in 2074. Duke Energy Florida expects that the assets of the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund will be sufficient to cover the contract price. On July 10, 2019, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC for approval of the Agreement. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Duke Energy Ohio

2017 Electric Security Plan

On June 1, 2017, Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO a request for a standard service offer in the form of an ESP. On February 15, 2018, the procedural schedule was suspended to facilitate ongoing settlement discussions. On April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed a Motion to consolidate this proceeding with several other cases pending before the PUCO, including, but not limited to, its Electric Base Rate Case. Additionally, on April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio, along with certain intervenors, filed a Stipulation and Recommendation (Stipulation) with the PUCO resolving certain issues in this proceeding. The term of the ESP would be from June 1, 2018, to May 31, 2025, and included continuation of market-based customer rates through competitive procurement processes for generation, continuation and expansion of existing rider mechanisms and proposed new rider mechanisms relating to regulatory mandates, costs incurred to enhance the customer experience and transform the grid and a service reliability rider for vegetation management. The Stipulation established a regulatory model for the next seven years via the approval of the ESP and continued the current model for procuring supply for non-shopping customers, including recovery mechanisms. On December 19, 2018, the PUCO approved the Stipulation without material modification. Several parties filed applications for rehearing. On February 6, 2019, the PUCO granted the parties rehearing. The PUCO issued its Second Entry on Rehearing on July 17, 2019, upholding its December 19, 2018 order and denying all assignments of error raised by the non-stipulating parties. The parties have the ability to appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court within 60 days of the July entry. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Electric Base Rate Case

Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO an electric distribution base rate case application and supporting testimony in March 2017. Duke Energy Ohio requested an estimated annual increase of approximately $ 15 million and a return on equity of 10.4 percent . The application also included requests to continue certain current riders and establish new riders. On September 26, 2017, the PUCO staff filed a report recommending a revenue decrease between approximately $ 18 million and $ 29 million and a return on equity between 9.22 percent and 10.24 percent . On April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed a Motion to consolidate this proceeding with several other cases pending before the PUCO. On April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio, along with certain intervenors, filed the Stipulation with the PUCO resolving numerous issues including those in this base rate proceeding. Major components of the Stipulation related to the base distribution rate case included a $ 19 million decrease in annual base distribution revenue with a return on equity unchanged from the current rate of 9.84 percent based upon a capital structure of 50.75 percent equity and 49.25 percent debt. Upon approval of new rates, Duke Energy Ohio's rider for recovering its initial SmartGrid implementation ended as these costs would be recovered through base rates. The Stipulation also renewed 14 existing riders, some of which were included in the company's ESP, and added two new riders including the Enhanced Service Reliability Rider to recover vegetation management costs not included in base rates, up to $ 10 million per year (operation and maintenance only) and the PowerForward Rider to recover costs incurred to enhance the customer experience and further transform the grid (operation and maintenance and capital). In addition to the changes in revenue attributable to the Stipulation, Duke Energy Ohio’s capital-related riders, including the Distribution Capital Investments Rider, began to reflect the lower federal income tax rate associated with the Tax Act with updates to customers’ bills beginning April 1, 2018. This change reduced electric revenue by approximately $ 20 million on an annualized basis. On December 19, 2018, the PUCO approved the Stipulation without material modification. New base rates were implemented effective January 2, 2019. Several parties filed applications for rehearing. On February 6, 2019, the PUCO granted the parties rehearing. The PUCO issued its Second Entry on Rehearing on July 17, 2019, upholding its December 19, 2018 order and denying all assignments of error raised by the non-stipulating parties. The parties have the ability to appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court within 60 days of the July entry. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Ohio Valley Electric Corporation

On March 31, 2017, Duke Energy Ohio filed for approval to adjust its existing price stabilization rider (Rider PSR) to pass through net costs related to its contractual entitlement to capacity and energy from the generating assets owned by OVEC. Duke Energy Ohio sought deferral authority for net costs incurred from April 1, 2017, until the new rates under Rider PSR were put into effect. On April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed a Motion to consolidate this proceeding with several other cases currently pending before the PUCO. Also, on April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio, along with certain intervenors, filed a Stipulation with the PUCO resolving numerous issues including those related to Rider PSR. The Stipulation activated Rider PSR for recovery of net costs incurred from January 1, 2018, through May 2025. On December 19, 2018, the PUCO approved the Stipulation without material modification. The PSR rider became effective April 1, 2019. Several parties filed applications for rehearing. On February 6, 2019, the PUCO granted the parties rehearing. The PUCO issued its Second Entry on Rehearing on July 17, 2019, upholding its December 19, 2018 order and denying all assignments of error raised by the non-stipulating parties. The parties have the ability to appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court within 60 days of the July entry. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

On July 23, 2019, an Ohio bill was signed into law that will be effective January 1, 2020. Among other things, the bill allows for recovery of prudently incurred costs, net of any revenues, for Ohio Investor-owned utilities that are participants under the OVEC power agreement. The recovery shall be through a non-bypassable rider that is to replace any existing recovery mechanism approved by the PUCO and will remain in place through 2030. The amounts recoverable from customers will be subject to an annual cap, with incremental costs that exceed such cap eligible for deferral and recovery subject to review. See Note 13 for additional discussion of Duke Energy Ohio's ownership interest in OVEC.

Tax Act – Ohio

On July 25, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application to establish a new rider to implement the benefits of the Tax Act for electric distribution customers. The new rider will flow through to customers the benefit of the lower statutory federal tax rate from 35 to 21 percent since January 1, 2018, all future benefits of the lower tax rates and a full refund of deferred income taxes collected at the higher tax rates in prior years. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules will be refunded consistent with federal law and deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules will be refunded over a 10-year period. Duke Energy Ohio's transmission rates reflect lower federal income tax but guidance from FERC on amortization of both protected and unprotected transmission-related EDITs is still pending. On October 24, 2018, the PUCO issued a Finding and Order that, among other things, directed all utilities over which the commission has rate-making authority to file an application to pass the benefits of the Tax Act to customers by January 1, 2019, unless otherwise exempted or directed by the PUCO. Duke Energy Ohio's July 25, 2018, filing for electric distribution operations is consistent with the commission's October 24, 2018, Finding and Order and no further action is needed. On February 20, 2019, the PUCO approved the application without material modification. Rates became effective March 1, 2019.

On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application to change its base rates and establish a new rider to implement the benefits of the Tax Act for natural gas customers. Duke Energy Ohio requested commission approval to implement the changes and rider effective April 1, 2019. The new rider will flow through to customers the benefit of the lower statutory federal tax rate from 35 to 21 percent since January 1, 2018, all future benefits of the lower tax rates and a full refund of deferred income taxes collected at the higher tax rates in prior years. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules will be refunded consistent with federal law and deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules will be refunded over a 10-year period. The PUCO established a procedural schedule and testimony was filed on July 31, 2019. An evidentiary hearing will take place on August 7, 2019. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery

On March 28, 2014, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application for recovery of program costs, lost distribution revenue and performance incentives related to its energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs. These programs are undertaken to comply with environmental mandates set forth in Ohio law. The PUCO approved Duke Energy Ohio’s application but found that Duke Energy Ohio was not permitted to use banked energy savings from previous years in order to calculate the amount of allowed incentive. This conclusion represented a change to the cost recovery mechanism that had been agreed upon by intervenors and approved by the PUCO in previous cases. The PUCO granted the applications for rehearing filed by Duke Energy Ohio and an intervenor. On January 6, 2016, Duke Energy Ohio and the PUCO Staff entered into a stipulation, pending the PUCO's approval, to resolve issues related to performance incentives and the PUCO Staff audit of 2013 costs, among other issues. In December 2015, based upon the stipulation, Duke Energy Ohio re-established approximately $ 20 million of the revenues that had been previously reversed. On October 26, 2016, the PUCO issued an order approving the stipulation without modification. In December 2016, the PUCO granted the intervenors request for rehearing for the purpose of further review. On April 10, 2019, the PUCO issued an Entry on Rehearing denying the rehearing applications.

On June 15, 2016, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application for approval of a three-year energy efficiency and peak demand reduction portfolio of programs. A stipulation and modified stipulation were filed on December 22, 2016, and January 27, 2017, respectively. Under the terms of the stipulations, which included support for deferral authority of all costs and a cap on shared savings incentives, Duke Energy Ohio has offered its energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs throughout 2017. On February 3, 2017, Duke Energy Ohio filed for deferral authority of its costs incurred in 2017 in respect of its proposed energy efficiency and peak demand reduction portfolio. On September 27, 2017, the PUCO issued an order approving a modified stipulation. The modifications impose an annual cap of approximately $ 38 million on program costs and shared savings incentives combined, but allowed for Duke Energy Ohio to file for a waiver of costs in excess of the cap in 2017. The PUCO approved the waiver request for 2017 up to a total cost of $ 56 million . On November 21, 2017, the PUCO granted Duke Energy Ohio's and intervenor's applications for rehearing of the September 27, 2017, order. On January 10, 2018, the PUCO denied the Ohio Consumers' Counsel’s application for rehearing of the PUCO order granting Duke Energy Ohio's waiver request; however, a decision on Duke Energy Ohio's application for rehearing remains pending. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

2014 Electric Security Plan

On May 30, 2018, the PUCO approved an extension of Duke Energy Ohio’s then-current ESP, including all terms and conditions thereof, excluding an extension of Duke Energy Ohio’s Rider DCI. Following rehearing, on July 25, 2018, the PUCO granted the request and allowed a continuing cap on recovery under Rider DCI. The orders were upheld on rehearing requested by OMA and OCC. The time period for parties to file for rehearing or appeal has expired.

In 2018, the OMA and OCC filed separate appeals of PUCO's approval of Duke Energy Ohio’s ESP with the Ohio Supreme Court, challenging PUCO's approval of Duke Energy Ohio’s Price Stability Rider as a placeholder and its Rider DCI to recover incremental revenue requirement for distribution capital since Duke Energy Ohio’s last base rate case. The Ohio Supreme Court issued an order on March 13, 2019, for the appellants to show cause why the appeals should not be dismissed as moot in light of the commission’s approval of Duke Energy Ohio’s current ESP. The OCC and OMA made the requested filings on March 20, 2019, and Duke Energy Ohio filed its response on March 27, 2019. Subsequent to OCC and OMA making the requested filings, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed the appeals as moot on May 8, 2019.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

Natural Gas Pipeline Extension

Duke Energy Ohio is proposing to install a new natural gas pipeline (the Central Corridor Project) in its Ohio service territory to increase system reliability and enable the retirement of older infrastructure. Duke Energy Ohio currently estimates the pipeline development costs and construction activities will range from $ 163 million to $ 245 million in direct costs (excluding overheads and AFUDC). On January 20, 2017, Duke Energy Ohio filed an amended application with the Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) for approval of one of two proposed routes. A public hearing was held on June 15, 2017. In April 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed a motion with OPSB to establish a procedural schedule and filed supplemental information supporting its application. On December 18, 2018, the OPSB established a procedural schedule that included a local public hearing on March 21, 2019. An evidentiary hearing began on April 9, 2019, and concluded on April 11, 2019. Briefs were filed on May 13, 2019, and reply briefs were filed on June 10, 2019. If approved, construction of the pipeline extension is expected to be completed before the 2021/2022 winter season. Duke Energy Ohio expects a decision by the end of 2019. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

2012 Natural Gas Rate Case/MGP Cost Recovery

As part of its 2012 natural gas base rate case, Duke Energy Ohio has approval to defer and recover costs related to environmental remediation at two sites (East End and West End) that housed former MGP operations. Duke Energy Ohio has made annual applications for recovery of these deferred costs. Duke Energy Ohio is currently recovering approximately $ 55 million in environmental remediation costs between 2009 through 2012 through a separate rider, Rider MGP. Duke Energy Ohio has made annual applications with the PUCO to recover its incremental remediation costs consistent with the PUCO’s directive in Duke Energy Ohio’s 2012 natural gas rate case. To date, the PUCO has not ruled on Duke Energy Ohio’s annual applications for the calendar years 2013 through 2017. On September 28, 2018, the staff of the PUCO issued a report recommending a disallowance of approximately $ 12 million of the $ 26 million in MGP remediation costs incurred between 2013 through 2017 that staff believes are not eligible for recovery. Staff interprets the PUCO’s 2012 Order granting Duke Energy Ohio recovery of MGP remediation as limiting the recovery to work directly on the East End and West End sites. On October 30, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed reply comments objecting to the staff’s recommendations and explaining, among other things, the obligation Duke Energy Ohio has under Ohio law to remediate all areas impacted by the former MGPs and not just physical property that housed the former plants and equipment. To date, the PUCO has not issued a procedural schedule and has not ruled on Duke Energy Ohio’s applications. On March 29, 2019, Duke Energy Ohio filed its annual application to recover incremental remediation expense for the calendar year 2018 seeking recovery of approximately $ 20 million in remediation costs. On July 12, 2019, the staff recommended a disallowance of approximately $ 11 million for work that staff believes occurred in areas not authorized for recovery. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

The 2012 PUCO order also contained conditional deadlines for completing the MGP environmental investigation and remediation costs at the MGP sites. Subsequent to the order, the deadline was extended to December 31, 2019. On May 10, 2019, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application requesting a continuation of its existing deferral authority for MGP remediation and investigation that must occur after December 31, 2019. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Duke Energy Kentucky Natural Gas Base Rate Case

On August 31, 2018, Duke Energy Kentucky filed an application with the KPSC requesting an increase in natural gas base rates of approximately $ 11 million , an approximate 11.1 percent average increase across all customer classes. The increase was net of approximately $ 5 million in annual savings as a result of the Tax Act. The drivers for this case are capital invested since Duke Energy Kentucky’s last rate case in 2009. Duke Energy Kentucky also sought implementation of a Weather Normalization Adjustment Mechanism, amortization of regulatory assets and to implement the impacts of the Tax Act, prospectively. On January 30, 2019, Duke Energy Kentucky entered into a settlement agreement with the Attorney General of Kentucky, the only intervenor in the case. The settlement provided for an approximate $ 7 million increase in natural gas base revenue, a return on equity of 9.7 percent and approval of the proposed Weather Normalization Mechanism. A hearing was held on February 5, 2019. The commission issued its Order approving the settlement without material modification on March 27, 2019. Revised customer rates were effective April 1, 2019.

Duke Energy Kentucky Electric Base Rate Case

On August 1, 2019, Duke Energy Kentucky filed a notice with the KPSC of its intent to file a general electric rate case application no earlier than 30 days from the notice submittal date.

Duke Energy Indiana

2019 Indiana Rate Case

On July 2, 2019, Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC, its first general rate case in Indiana in 16 years, for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $ 395 million , which represents an approximate 15 percent increase in retail revenues. The rate increase is driven by strategic investments to generate cleaner electricity, improve reliability and serve a growing customer base. The request is premised upon a Duke Energy Indiana rate base of $ 10.2 billion as of December 31, 2018, and adjusted for projected changes through December 31, 2020. Hearings are expected to commence in early 2020, with rates to be effective by mid-2020. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

FERC Transmission Return on Equity Complaint

Customer groups have filed with the FERC complaints against MISO and its transmission-owning members, including Duke Energy Indiana, alleging, among other things, that the current base rate of return on equity earned by MISO transmission owners of 12.38 percent is unjust and unreasonable. The complaints claim, among other things, that the current base rate of return on equity earned by MISO transmission owners should be reduced to 8.67 percent . On January 5, 2015, the FERC issued an order accepting the MISO transmission owners' adder of 0.50 percent to the base rate of return on equity based on participation in an RTO subject to it being applied to a return on equity that is shown to be just and reasonable in the pending return on equity complaints. On December 22, 2015, the presiding FERC ALJ in the first complaint issued an Initial Decision in which the base rate of return on equity was set at 10.32 percent . On September 28, 2016, the Initial Decision in the first complaint was affirmed by FERC, but is subject to rehearing requests. On June 30, 2016, the presiding FERC ALJ in the second complaint issued an Initial Decision setting the base rate of return on equity at 9.70 percent . The Initial Decision in the second complaint is pending FERC review. On April 14, 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court, in Emera Maine v. FERC , reversed and remanded certain aspects of the methodology employed by FERC to establish rates of return on equity. On October 16, 2018, FERC issued an order in response to the Emera remand proceeding proposing a new method for determining whether an existing return on equity is unjust and unreasonable, and a new process for determining a just and reasonable return on equity. On November 14, 2018, FERC directed parties to the MISO complaints to file briefs on how the new process for determining return on equity proposed in the Emera proceeding should be applied to the complaints involving the MISO transmission owners’ return on equity. Initial briefs were filed on February 13, 2019, and reply briefs were filed April 10, 2019. Duke Energy Indiana currently believes these matters will not have a material impact on its results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Edwardsport Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Plant

On September 20, 2018, Duke Energy Indiana, the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, the Duke Industrial Group and Nucor Steel – Indiana entered into a settlement agreement to resolve IGCC ratemaking issues for calendar years 2018 and 2019. The agreement will remain in effect until new rates are established in Duke Energy Indiana's next base rate case, which was filed on July 2, 2019, with rates to be effective in mid-2020. An evidentiary hearing was held in December 2018, and on June 5, 2019, the IURC issued an Order approving the 2018 Settlement Agreement.

Piedmont

North Carolina Integrity Management Rider Filing

On April 30, 2019, Piedmont filed a petition under the IMR mechanism to update rates, based on the eligible capital investments closed to integrity and safety projects over the six-month period ending March 31, 2019. The NCUC approved the petition on May 29, 2019, and rates became effective June 1, 2019. The effect of the update was an increase to annual revenues of approximately $ 9 million .

Tennessee Integrity Management Rider Filing

In November 2018, Piedmont filed a petition with the TPUC under the IMR mechanism to collect an additional $ 3 million in annual revenues, effective January 2019, based on the eligible capital investments closed to integrity and safety projects over the 12-month period ending October 31, 2018. A hearing on the matter was held on March 11, 2019. On May 20, 2019, the TPUC approved Piedmont's IMR application as filed and revised customer rates were effective June 1, 2019.

2019 North Carolina Rate Case

On April 1, 2019, Piedmont filed an application with the NCUC, its first general rate case in North Carolina in six years, for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $ 83 million , which represents an approximate 9 percent increase in retail revenues. The rate increase is driven by significant infrastructure upgrade investments (plant additions) since the last general rate case, offset by savings that customers will begin receiving due to federal and state tax reform. Approximately half of the plant additions being rolled into rate base are categories of plant investment not covered under the IMR mechanism, which was originally approved as part of the 2013 North Carolina Rate Case. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin on August 19, 2019, and a decision and revised customer rates are expected by the end of 2019. Piedmont cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

OTHER REGULATORY MATTERS

Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC

On September 2, 2014, Duke Energy, Dominion Resources (Dominion), Piedmont and Southern Company Gas announced the formation of Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (ACP) to build and own the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP pipeline), an approximately 600-mile interstate natural gas pipeline running from West Virginia to North Carolina. The ACP pipeline is designed to meet, in part, the needs identified by Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Piedmont. Dominion will be responsible for building and operating the ACP pipeline and holds a leading ownership percentage in ACP of 48 percent . Duke Energy owns a 47 percent interest, which is accounted for as an equity method investment through its Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment. Southern Company Gas maintains a 5 percent interest. See Note 13 for additional information related to Duke Energy's ownership interest. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Piedmont, among others, will be customers of the pipeline. Purchases will be made under several 20 -year supply contracts, subject to state regulatory approval.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

In 2018, the FERC issued a series of Notices to Proceed, which authorized the project to begin certain construction-related activities along the pipeline route, including supply header and compressors. On May 11, 2018, and October 19, 2018, FERC issued Notices to Proceed allowing full construction activities in all areas of West Virginia except in the Monongahela National Forest. On July 24, 2018, FERC issued a Notice to Proceed allowing full construction activities along the project route in North Carolina. On October 19, 2018, the conditions to effectiveness of the Virginia 401 water quality certification were satisfied. Immediately following receipt of the Virginia 401 certification, ACP filed a request for FERC to issue a Notice to Proceed with full construction activities in Virginia. We appreciate the professional and collaborative process by the permitting agencies designed to ensure that this critical energy infrastructure project will meet the stringent environmental standards required by law and regulation.

ACP is the subject of challenges in state and federal courts and agencies, including, among others, challenges of the project’s biological opinion (BiOp) and incidental take statement (ITS), crossings of the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Appalachian Trail, and the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests, the project’s U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 404 permit, the Virginia conditional 401 water quality certification, the project's air permit for a compressor station at Buckingham, Virginia, the FERC Environmental Impact Statement order and the FERC order approving the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Each of these challenges alleges non-compliance on the part of federal and state permitting authorities and adverse ecological consequences if the project is permitted to proceed. Since December 2018, notable developments in these challenges include a stay in December 2018 issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Fourth Circuit) and the same court's ultimate vacatur of the project's BiOp and ITS (which stay has halted most project construction activity), a Fourth Circuit decision vacating the project's permits to cross the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests and the Appalachian Trail, the Fourth Circuit's remand to USACE of ACP's Huntington District 404 verification and the Fourth Circuit’s remand to the National Park Service of the ACP’s Blue Ridge Parkway right-of-way. ACP is vigorously defending these challenges and coordinating with the federal and state authorities which are the direct parties to the challenges. The Solicitor General of the United States and ACP filed petitions for certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States on June 25, 2019, regarding the Appalachian Trail crossing and anticipate a decision in October 2019 from the Supreme Court of the United States as to whether it will hear the case. ACP is also evaluating possible legislative remedies to this issue. On July 26, 2019, the Fourth Circuit issued an order vacating ACP's BiOp and ITS, finding that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) had reached arbitrary conclusions in issuing the vacated BiOp and ITS. In anticipation of such an order by the Fourth Circuit, ACP and the FWS commenced work in mid-May of 2019 to set the basis for a reissued BiOp and ITS. ACP continues coordinating and working with FWS and other parties in preparation for a reissuance of the BiOp and ITS.

The delays resulting from the legal challenges described above have impacted the cost and schedule for the project. As a result, project cost estimates have increased to $ 7.0 billion to $ 7.8 billion , excluding financing costs. ACP expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for key segments of the project, while it expects the remainder to extend into 2021. Abnormal weather, work delays (including delays due to judicial or regulatory action) and other conditions may result in cost or schedule modifications in the future.

Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC

Duke Energy owns a 24 percent ownership interest in Constitution, which is accounted for as an equity method investment. Constitution is a natural gas pipeline project slated to transport natural gas supplies from the Marcellus supply region in northern Pennsylvania to major northeastern markets. The pipeline will be constructed and operated by Williams Partners L.P., which has a 41 percent ownership share. The remaining interest is held by Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation and WGL Holdings, Inc. Before the permitting delays discussed below, Duke Energy's total anticipated contributions were approximately $ 229 million . As a result of the permitting delays and project uncertainty, total anticipated contributions by Duke Energy can no longer be reasonably estimated. Since April 2016, with the actions of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Constitution stopped construction and discontinued capitalization of future development costs until the project's uncertainty is resolved.

In December 2014, Constitution received approval from the FERC to construct and operate the proposed pipeline. However, on April 22, 2016, the NYSDEC denied Constitution’s application for a necessary water quality certification for the New York portion of the Constitution pipeline. Constitution filed a series of legal actions challenging the legality and appropriateness of the NYSDEC’s decision, culminating in an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, which appeal was denied on April 30, 2018. In addition, in October 2017, Constitution filed a petition for declaratory order requesting FERC to find that the NYSDEC waived its rights to issue a Section 401 water quality certification by not acting on Constitution's application within a reasonable period of time as required by statute, which petition was denied on January 11, 2018.

On January 25, 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court rendered a decision in Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC that withdrawal and resubmission of an application for a Section 401 water quality certification constituted a waiver by the relevant state agency when such withdrawals and resubmissions were intended to extend the one-year limit on accepting or rejecting such an application. As Constitution had made similar arguments in its 2018 petition to FERC for a declaratory order, on April 1, 2019, Constitution filed a new petition for declaratory order requesting FERC find a waiver on the part of NYSDEC in accordance with the D.C. Circuit Court’s newly established precedent. On May 1, 2019, Constitution filed its response to supplemental pleadings filed by NYSDEC and others in this proceeding. A FERC response is expected later this year.

Constitution is currently unable to approximate an in-service date for the project due to the NYSDEC's denial of the water quality certification. The Constitution partners remain committed to the project and are evaluating next steps to move the project forward. On June 25, 2018, Constitution filed with FERC a Request for Extension of Time until December 2, 2020, for construction of the project. On November 5, 2018, FERC issued an Order Granting Extension of Time.

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, Duke Energy recorded an OTTI of $ 55 million within Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on Duke Energy's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The charge represented the excess carrying value over the estimated fair value of the project, which was based on a Level 3 Fair Value measurement that was determined from the income approach using discounted cash flows. The impairment was primarily due to actions taken by the courts and regulators to uphold the NYSDEC's denial of the certification and uncertainty associated with the remaining legal and regulatory challenges.

See Note 13 for additional information related to ownership interest and carrying value of the investment.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REGULATORY MATTERS

Potential Coal Plant Retirements

The Subsidiary Registrants periodically file IRPs with their state regulatory commissions. The IRPs provide a view of forecasted energy needs over a long term (10 to 20 years) and options being considered to meet those needs. IRPs filed by the Subsidiary Registrants included planning assumptions to potentially retire certain coal-fired generating facilities in North Carolina and Indiana earlier than their current estimated useful lives. Duke Energy continues to evaluate the potential need to retire these coal-fired generating facilities earlier than the current estimated useful lives and plans to seek regulatory recovery for amounts that would not be otherwise recovered when any of these assets are retired.

The table below contains the net carrying value of generating facilities planned for retirement or included in recent IRPs as evaluated for potential retirement. Dollar amounts in the table below are included in Net property, plant and equipment on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019 , and exclude capitalized asset retirement costs.

	Capacity	Remaining Net — Book Value
	(in MW)	(in millions)
Duke Energy Carolinas
Allen Steam Station Units 1-3 (a)	585	156
Duke Energy Indiana
Gallagher Units 2 and 4 (b)	280	118
Gibson Units 1-5 (c)	3,132	1,960
Cayuga Units 1-2 (c)	1,005	983
Total Duke Energy	5,002	$ 3,217

(a) Duke Energy Carolinas will retire Allen Steam Station Units 1 through 3 by December 31, 2024, as part of the resolution of a lawsuit involving alleged New Source Review violations.

(b) Duke Energy Indiana committed to either retire or stop burning coal at Gallagher Units 2 and 4 by December 31, 2022, as part of the 2016 settlement of Edwardsport IGCC matters.

(c) On July 1, 2019, Duke Energy Indiana filed its 2018 IRP with the IURC. The 2018 IRP included scenarios evaluating the potential retirement of coal-fired generating units at Gibson and Cayuga. The rate case filed July 2, 2019, includes proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates from 2026 to 2038.

Refer to the "Western Carolinas Modernization Plan" discussion above for details of Duke Energy Progress' planned retirements.

4 . COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

ENVIRONMENTAL

The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, coal ash and other environmental matters. These regulations can be changed from time to time, imposing new obligations on the Duke Energy Registrants. The following environmental matters impact all Duke Energy Registrants.

Remediation Activities

In addition to AROs recorded as a result of various environmental regulations, the Duke Energy Registrants are responsible for environmental remediation at various sites. These include certain properties that are part of ongoing operations and sites formerly owned or used by Duke Energy entities. These sites are in various stages of investigation, remediation and monitoring. Managed in conjunction with relevant federal, state and local agencies, remediation activities vary based upon site conditions and location, remediation requirements, complexity and sharing of responsibility. If remediation activities involve joint and several liability provisions, strict liability, or cost recovery or contribution actions, the Duke Energy Registrants could potentially be held responsible for environmental impacts caused by other potentially responsible parties and may also benefit from insurance policies or contractual indemnities that cover some or all cleanup costs. Liabilities are recorded when losses become probable and are reasonably estimable. The total costs that may be incurred cannot be estimated because the extent of environmental impact, allocation among potentially responsible parties, remediation alternatives and/or regulatory decisions have not yet been determined at all sites. Additional costs associated with remediation activities are likely to be incurred in the future and could be significant. Costs are typically expensed as Operation, maintenance and other on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations unless regulatory recovery of the costs is deemed probable.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The following tables contain information regarding reserves for probable and estimable costs related to the various environmental sites. These reserves are recorded in Accounts Payable within Current Liabilities and Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
			Duke				Duke		Duke	Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy	Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida	Ohio		Indiana	Piedmont
Balance at beginning of period	$ 77		$ 11		$ 11		$ 4		$ 6	$ 48		$ 5	$ 2
Provisions/adjustments	9		4		3		2		1	2		—	—
Cash reductions	( 22	)	( 3	)	( 1	)	( 1	)	—	( 18	)	—	—
Balance at end of period	$ 64		$ 12		$ 13		$ 5		$ 7	$ 32		$ 5	$ 2

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Ohio		Indiana		Piedmont
Balance at beginning of period	$ 81		$ 10		$ 15		$ 3		$ 12		$ 47		$ 5		$ 2
Provisions/adjustments	1		2		2		2		( 1	)	( 3	)	1		—
Cash reductions	( 14	)	( 1	)	( 2	)	( 1	)	( 1	)	( 9	)	( 1	)	—
Balance at end of period	$ 68		$ 11		$ 15		$ 4		$ 10		$ 35		$ 5		$ 2

Additional losses in excess of recorded reserves that could be incurred for the stages of investigation, remediation and monitoring for environmental sites that have been evaluated at this time are not material except as presented in the table below.

(in millions)
Duke Energy	$ 51
Duke Energy Carolinas	12
Duke Energy Ohio	29
Piedmont	2

LITIGATION

Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress

NCDEQ Closure Litigation

The Coal Ash Act requires CCR surface impoundments in North Carolina to be closed, with the closure method and timing based on a risk ranking classification determined by legislation or state regulators. The NCDEQ previously classified the impoundments at Allen, Belews Creek, Rogers, Marshall, Mayo and Roxboro as low risk and Duke Energy expected to close those sites through a combination of a cap system and a groundwater monitoring system. However, on April 1, 2019, NCDEQ issued a closure determination (NCDEQ's April 1 Order) requiring Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress to excavate all remaining coal ash impoundments at these facilities. On April 26, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed Petitions for Contested Case Hearings in the Office of Administrative Hearings to challenge NCDEQ's April 1 Order. On May 9, 2019, NCDEQ issued a supplemental order requiring that closure plans be submitted on December 31, 2019, but providing that the corrective action plans are not due until March 31, 2020. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed amended petitions on May 24, 2019, incorporating the May 9, 2019 order.

On June 14, 2019, NCDEQ filed a motion to dismiss several claims in Duke Energy Carolinas' and Duke Energy Progress' appeals. On August 2, 2019, the court entered an order granting NCDEQ's motion to dismiss several of the claims. The lawsuit will proceed on the remaining issues, including whether the NCDEQ's decision was arbitrary and capricious. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Coal Ash Insurance Coverage Litigation

In March 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed a civil action in North Carolina Superior Court against various insurance providers. The lawsuit seeks payment for coal ash-related liabilities covered by third-party liability insurance policies. The insurance policies were issued between 1971 and 1986 and provide third-party liability insurance for property damage. The civil action seeks damages for breach of contract and indemnification for costs arising from the Coal Ash Act and the EPA CCR rule at 15 coal-fired plants in North Carolina and South Carolina. On May 14, 2019, the court granted an extension of stay, until September 15, 2019, to allow the parties to discuss potential resolution. If the case is not fully resolved at that time, litigation will resume. The trial is now scheduled for February 2021. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NCDEQ State Enforcement Actions

In the first quarter of 2013, the SELC sent notices of intent to sue Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress related to alleged CWA violations from coal ash basins at two of their coal-fired power plants in North Carolina. The NCDEQ filed enforcement actions against Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress alleging violations of water discharge permits and North Carolina groundwater standards. The cases have been consolidated and are being heard before a single judge in the North Carolina Superior Court.

On August 16, 2013, the NCDEQ filed an enforcement action against Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress related to their remaining plants in North Carolina, alleging violations of the CWA and violations of the North Carolina groundwater standards. Both of these cases have been assigned to the judge handling the enforcement actions discussed above. SELC is representing several environmental groups who have been permitted to intervene in these cases.

The court issued orders in 2016 granting Motions for Partial Summary Judgment for seven of the 14 North Carolina plants named in the enforcement actions. On February 13, 2017, the court issued an order denying motions for partial summary judgment brought by both the environmental groups and Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress for the remaining seven plants. On March 15, 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed a Notice of Appeal with the North Carolina Court of Appeals to challenge the trial court’s order. The parties were unable to reach an agreement at mediation in April 2017 and submitted briefs to the trial court on remaining issues to be tried. On August 1, 2018, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal and the matter is proceeding before the trial court. In light of the NCDEQ's April 1 Order, on April 29, 2019, the court decided to stay any activity in the case until August 2019, at which time the court will hold another status conference. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Federal Citizens Suits

On June 13, 2016, the RRBA filed a federal citizen suit in the Middle District of North Carolina alleging unpermitted discharges to surface water and groundwater violations at the Mayo Plant. On August 19, 2016, Duke Energy Progress filed a Motion to Dismiss. On April 26, 2017, the court entered an order dismissing four of the claims in the federal citizen suit. Two claims relating to alleged violations of NPDES permit provisions survived the motion to dismiss, and Duke Energy Progress filed its response on May 10, 2017. Duke Energy Progress and RRBA each filed motions for summary judgment on March 23, 2018. The court has not yet ruled on these motions.

On May 16, 2017, RRBA filed a federal citizen suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, which asserts two claims relating to alleged violations of NPDES permit provisions at the Roxboro Plant and one claim relating to the use of nearby water bodies. Duke Energy Progress and RRBA each filed motions for summary judgment on April 17, 2018, and the court has not yet ruled on these motions.

On May 8, 2018, on motion from Duke Energy Progress, the court ordered trial in both of the above matters to be consolidated. On April 5, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a motion to stay the case following the NCDEQ’s April 1 Order. On August 2, 2019, the court ordered that this case is stayed and shall remain stayed pending further order from the court.

On December 5, 2017, various parties filed a federal citizen suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina for alleged violations at Duke Energy Carolinas' Belews Creek under the CWA. Duke Energy Carolinas' answer to the complaint was filed on August 27, 2018. On October 10, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed Motions to Dismiss for lack of standing, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion to Stay Discovery. On January 9, 2019, the court entered an order denying Duke Energy Carolinas' motion to stay discovery. There has been no ruling on the other pending motions. On April 5, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a motion to stay the case following the NCDEQ’s April 1 Order. On August 2, 2019, the court ordered that this case is stayed and shall remain stayed pending further order from the court.

Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of these matters.

Asbestos-related Injuries and Damages Claims

Duke Energy Carolinas has experienced numerous claims for indemnification and medical cost reimbursement related to asbestos exposure. These claims relate to damages for bodily injuries alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with construction and maintenance activities conducted on its electric generation plants prior to 1985. As of June 30, 2019 , there were 145 asserted claims for non-malignant cases with cumulative relief sought of up to $ 38 million , and 50 asserted claims for malignant cases with cumulative relief sought of up to $ 16 million . Based on Duke Energy Carolinas’ experience, it is expected that the ultimate resolution of most of these claims likely will be less than the amount claimed.

Duke Energy Carolinas has recognized asbestos-related reserves of $ 607 million at June 30, 2019 , and $ 630 million at December 31, 2018 . These reserves are classified in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Other within Current Liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. These reserves are based upon Duke Energy Carolinas' best estimate for current and future asbestos claims through 2038 and are recorded on an undiscounted basis. In light of the uncertainties inherent in a longer-term forecast, management does not believe they can reasonably estimate the indemnity and medical costs that might be incurred after 2038 related to such potential claims. It is possible Duke Energy Carolinas may incur asbestos liabilities in excess of the recorded reserves.

Duke Energy Carolinas has third-party insurance to cover certain losses related to asbestos-related injuries and damages above an aggregate self-insured retention. Duke Energy Carolinas’ cumulative payments began to exceed the self-insured retention in 2008. Future payments up to the policy limit will be reimbursed by the third-party insurance carrier. The insurance policy limit for potential future insurance recoveries indemnification and medical cost claim payments is $ 764 million in excess of the self-insured retention. Receivables for insurance recoveries were $ 739 million at June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 . These amounts are classified in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets and Receivables within Current Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Duke Energy Carolinas is not aware of any uncertainties regarding the legal sufficiency of insurance claims. Duke Energy Carolinas believes the insurance recovery asset is probable of recovery as the insurance carrier continues to have a strong financial strength rating.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida

Spent Nuclear Fuel Matters

On June 18, 2018, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida sued the U.S. in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for damages incurred for the period 2014 through 2018. The lawsuit claimed the Department of Energy breached a contract in failing to accept spent nuclear fuel under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and asserted damages for the cost of on-site storage in the amount of $ 100 million and $ 203 million for Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively. Discovery is ongoing and a trial is expected to occur in 2020.

Duke Energy Florida

Fluor Contract Litigation

On January 29, 2019, Fluor filed a breach of contract lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Duke Energy Florida related to an EPC agreement for the combined-cycle natural gas plant in Citrus County, Florida. Fluor filed an amended complaint on February 13, 2019. Fluor’s multicount complaint seeks civil, statutory and contractual remedies related to Duke Energy Florida’s $ 67 million draw in early 2019, on Fluor’s letter of credit and offset of invoiced amounts. Duke Energy Florida moved to dismiss all counts of Fluor's amended complaint, and on April 16, 2019, the court dismissed Fluor's complaint without prejudice. On April 26, 2019, Fluor filed a second amended complaint. Duke Energy Florida is attempting to recover from Fluor $ 110 million in additional costs incurred by Duke Energy Florida.

On August 1, 2019, Duke Energy Florida and Fluor reached a settlement to resolve the pending litigation and other outstanding issues related to completing the Citrus County combined-cycle plant. The terms of the settlement will not have a material impact on Duke Energy Florida's results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Other Litigation and Legal Proceedings

The Duke Energy Registrants are involved in other legal, tax and regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve significant amounts. The Duke Energy Registrants believe the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

The table below presents recorded reserves based on management’s best estimate of probable loss for legal matters, excluding asbestos-related reserves discussed above. Reserves are classified on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Other within Current Liabilities. The reasonably possible range of loss in excess of recorded reserves is not material, other than as described above.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018
Reserves for Legal Matters
Duke Energy	$ 64	$ 65
Duke Energy Carolinas	7	9
Progress Energy	55	54
Duke Energy Progress	14	12
Duke Energy Florida	24	24
Piedmont	1	1

OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

General

As part of their normal business, the Duke Energy Registrants are party to various financial guarantees, performance guarantees and other contractual commitments to extend guarantees of credit and other assistance to various subsidiaries, investees and other third parties. These guarantees involve elements of performance and credit risk, which are not fully recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and have unlimited maximum potential payments. However, the Duke Energy Registrants do not believe these guarantees will have a material effect on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In addition, the Duke Energy Registrants enter into various fixed-price, noncancelable commitments to purchase or sell power or natural gas, take-or-pay arrangements, transportation, or throughput agreements and other contracts that may or may not be recognized on their respective Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Some of these arrangements may be recognized at fair value on their respective Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets if such contracts meet the definition of a derivative and the NPNS exception does not apply. In most cases, the Duke Energy Registrants’ purchase obligation contracts contain provisions for price adjustments, minimum purchase levels and other financial commitments.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LEASES

5 . LEASES

As described in Note 1, Duke Energy adopted the revised accounting guidance for Leases effective January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method of adoption, which does not require restatement of prior year reported results. Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of ROU assets and operating lease liabilities as follows:

	As of January 1, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
ROU assets	$ 1,750	$ 153	$ 863	$ 407	$ 456	$ 23	$ 61	$ 26
Operating lease liabilities – current	205	28	96	35	61	1	4	4
Operating lease liabilities – noncurrent	1,504	127	766	371	395	22	58	25

As part of its operations, Duke Energy leases certain aircraft, space on communication towers, industrial equipment, fleet vehicles, fuel transportation (barges and railcars), land and office space under various terms and expiration dates. Additionally, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Indiana have finance leases related to firm natural gas pipeline transportation capacity. Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida have entered into certain PPAs, which are classified as finance and operating leases.

Duke Energy has certain lease agreements, which include variable lease payments that are based on the usage of an asset. These variable lease payments are not included in the measurement of the ROU assets or operating lease liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain Duke Energy lease agreements include options for renewal and early termination. The intent to renew a lease varies depending on the lease type and asset. Renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised are included in the lease measurements. The decision to terminate a lease early is dependent on various economic factors. No termination options have been included in any of the lease measurements.

Duke Energy operates various renewable energy projects and sells the generated output to utilities, electric cooperatives, municipalities and commercial and industrial customers through long-term PPAs. In certain situations, these PPAs and the associated renewable energy projects qualify as operating leases. Rental income from these leases is accounted for as Nonregulated electric and other revenues in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. There are no minimum lease payments as all payments are contingent based on actual electricity generated by the renewable energy projects. Contingent lease payments were $ 72 million and $ 136 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 , respectively. As of June 30, 2019 , renewable energy projects owned by Duke Energy and accounted for as operating leases had a cost basis of $ 3,344 million and accumulated depreciation of $ 661 million . These assets are principally classified as nonregulated electric generation and transmission assets.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LEASES

The following table presents the components of lease expense.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Operating lease expense (a)	$ 73	$ 11	$ 40	$ 17	$ 23	$ 3	$ 5	$ 2
Short-term lease expense (a)	6	2	4	2	2	1	—	—
Variable lease expense (a)	10	4	5	2	3	—	—	—
Finance lease expense
Amortization of leased assets (b)	29	1	5	1	4	1	—	—
Interest on lease liabilities (c)	20	3	13	10	3	—	1	—
Total finance lease expense	49	4	18	11	7	1	1	—
Total lease expense	$ 138	$ 21	$ 67	$ 32	$ 35	$ 5	$ 6	$ 2

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Operating lease expense (a)	$ 145	$ 23	$ 82	$ 36	$ 46	$ 6	$ 10	$ 3
Short-term lease expense (a)	13	4	7	3	4	1	1	—
Variable lease expense (a)	21	12	7	3	4	—	—	—
Finance lease expense
Amortization of leased assets (b)	56	2	8	2	6	1	—	—
Interest on lease liabilities (c)	37	7	19	14	5	—	1	—
Total finance lease expense	93	9	27	16	11	1	1	—
Total lease expense	$ 272	$ 48	$ 123	$ 58	$ 65	$ 8	$ 12	$ 3

(a) Included in Operations, maintenance and other or, for barges and railcars, Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(b) Included in Depreciation and amortization on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The following table presents rental expense for operating leases, as reported under the old lease standard. These amounts are included in Operation, maintenance and other and Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(in millions)	Year Ended December 31, 2018
Duke Energy	$ 268
Duke Energy Carolinas	49
Progress Energy	143
Duke Energy Progress	75
Duke Energy Florida	68
Duke Energy Ohio	13
Duke Energy Indiana	21
Piedmont	11

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LEASES

The following table presents operating lease maturities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to operating lease liabilities.

	Twelve Months Ended June 30,
			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Ohio		Indiana		Piedmont
2020	$ 279		$ 33		$ 129		$ 51		$ 78		$ 2		$ 6		$ 5
2021	239		28		112		52		60		2		5		5
2022	199		19		94		40		54		2		4		5
2023	190		18		95		40		55		2		4		5
2024	178		15		96		41		55		2		4		5
Thereafter	1,055		61		513		306		207		22		65		7
Total operating lease payments	2,140		174		1,039		530		509		32		88		32
Less: present value discount	( 425	)	( 30	)	( 192	)	( 117	)	( 75	)	( 10	)	( 28	)	( 3	)
Total operating lease liabilities (a)	$ 1,715		$ 144		$ 847		$ 413		$ 434		$ 22		$ 60		$ 29

(a) Certain operating lease payments include renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised.

The following table presents future minimum lease payments under operating leases, which at inception had a non-cancelable term of more than one year, as reported under the old lease standard.

	December 31, 2018	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
2019	$ 239	$ 33	$ 97	$ 49	$ 48	$ 2	$ 6	$ 5
2020	219	29	90	46	44	2	5	5
2021	186	19	79	37	42	2	4	5
2022	170	19	76	34	42	2	4	5
2023	160	17	77	35	42	2	5	6
Thereafter	1,017	68	455	314	141	23	66	11
Total	$ 1,991	$ 185	$ 874	$ 515	$ 359	$ 33	$ 90	$ 37

The following table presents finance lease maturities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to finance lease liabilities.

	Twelve Months Ended June 30,
			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Indiana
2020	$ 177		$ 19		$ 69		$ 44		$ 25		$ 1
2021	183		17		69		44		25		1
2022	180		14		69		44		25		1
2023	171		14		69		44		25		1
2024	172		14		64		44		20		1
Thereafter	847		191		560		547		13		28
Total finance lease payments	1,730		269		900		767		133		33
Less: amounts representing interest	( 708	)	( 162	)	( 483	)	( 457	)	( 26	)	( 23	)
Total finance lease liabilities	$ 1,022		$ 107		$ 417		$ 310		$ 107		$ 10

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LEASES

The following table presents future minimum lease payments under finance leases, as reported under the old lease standard.

	December 31, 2018
			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke	Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Ohio	Indiana
2019	$ 170		$ 20		$ 45		$ 20		$ 25		$ 2	$ 1
2020	174		20		46		21		25		—	1
2021	177		15		45		20		25		—	1
2022	165		15		45		21		24		—	1
2023	165		15		45		21		24		—	1
Thereafter	577		204		230		209		21		—	27
Minimum annual payments	1,428		289		456		312		144		2	32
Less: amount representing interest	( 487	)	( 180	)	( 205	)	( 175	)	( 30	)	—	( 22	)
Total	$ 941		$ 109		$ 251		$ 137		$ 114		$ 2	$ 10

The following tables contain additional information related to leases.

		June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
		Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Classification	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Assets
Operating	Operating lease ROU assets, net	$ 1,735	$ 141	$ 839	$ 407	$ 432	$ 22	$ 60	$ 26
Finance	Net property, plant and equipment	1,013	122	423	309	114	—	10	—
Total lease assets		$ 2,748	$ 263	$ 1,262	$ 716	$ 546	$ 22	$ 70	$ 26
Liabilities
Current
Operating	Other current liabilities	$ 213	$ 27	$ 100	$ 36	$ 64	$ 1	$ 4	$ 4
Finance	Current maturities of long-term debt	115	6	23	6	17	—	—	—
Noncurrent
Operating	Operating lease liabilities	1,502	117	747	377	370	21	56	25
Finance	Long-Term Debt	907	101	394	304	90	—	10	—
Total lease liabilities		$ 2,737	$ 251	$ 1,264	$ 723	$ 541	$ 22	$ 70	$ 29

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LEASES

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities (a)
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$ 136	$ 15	$ 60	$ 23	$ 37	$ 1	$ 3	$ 5
Operating cash flows from finance leases	37	7	19	14	5	—	1	—
Financing cash flows from finance leases	56	2	8	2	6	1	—	—
Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (non-cash)
Operating (b)	$ 78	$ 2	$ 30	$ 30	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 1
Finance	175	—	175	175	—	—	—	—

(a) No amounts were classified as investing cash flows from operating leases for the six months ended June 30, 2019 .

(b) Does not include ROU assets recorded as a result of the adoption of the new lease standard.

	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases	11	9	10	12	9	18	19	6
Finance leases	16	19	17	18	12	—	27	—
Weighted-average discount rate (a)
Operating leases	3.9 %	3.7 %	3.8 %	3.8 %	3.7 %	4.2 %	4.1 %	3.6 %
Finance leases	7.9 %	12.9 %	11.8 %	12.4 %	8.3 %	— %	11.9 %	— %

(a) The discount rate is calculated using the rate implicit in a lease if it is readily determinable. Generally, the rate used by the lessor is not provided to Duke Energy and in these cases the incremental borrowing rate is used. Duke Energy will typically use its fully collateralized incremental borrowing rate as of the commencement date to calculate and record the lease. The incremental borrowing rate is influenced by the lessee’s credit rating and lease term and as such may differ for individual leases, embedded leases or portfolios of leased assets.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES

6 . DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT DEBT ISSUANCES

The following table summarizes significant debt issuances (in millions).

				Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
					Duke	Duke	Duke
	Maturity	Interest		Duke	Energy	Energy	Energy
Issuance Date	Date	Rate		Energy	(Parent)	Progress	Ohio	Piedmont
Unsecured Debt
March 2019 (a)	March 2022	3.251 %	(b)	$ 300	$ 300	$ —	$ —	$ —
March 2019 (a)	March 2022	3.227 %		300	300	—	—	—
May 2019 (e)	June 2029	3.500 %		600	—	—	—	600
June 2019 (a)	June 2029	3.400 %		600	600	—	—	—
June 2019 (a)	June 2049	4.200 %		600	600	—	—	—
First Mortgage Bonds
January 2019 (c)	February 2029	3.650 %		400	—	—	400	—
January 2019 (c)	February 2049	4.300 %		400	—	—	400	—
March 2019 (d)	March 2029	3.450 %		600	—	600	—	—
Total issuances				$ 3,800	$ 1,800	$ 600	$ 800	$ 600

(a) Debt issued to pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.

(b) Debt issuance has a floating interest rate.

(c) Debt issued to repay at maturity $ 450 million first mortgage bonds due April 2019, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.

(d) Debt issued to fund eligible green energy projects in the Carolinas.

(e) Debt issued to repay in full the outstanding $ 350 million Piedmont unsecured term loan due September 2019, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.

In June 2019, Duke Energy Kentucky priced $ 210 million of unsecured debentures of which $ 95 million carry a fixed interest rate of 3.23 percent and mature October 2025, $ 75 million carry a fixed interest rate of 3.56 percent and mature October 2029, and $ 40 million carry a fixed interest rate of 4.32 percent and mature July 2049. The $ 40 million tranche closed and funded in July 2019, and the remaining tranches are expected to close in September 2019 upon receipt of necessary regulatory approvals. The proceeds will be used to refinance Duke Energy Kentucky's $ 100 million , 4.65 percent debentures maturing October 2019, to pay down short-term intercompany debt and for general corporate purposes.

CURRENT MATURITIES OF LONG-TERM DEBT

The following table shows the significant components of Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Duke Energy Registrants currently anticipate satisfying these obligations with cash on hand and proceeds from additional borrowings.

(in millions)	Maturity Date	Interest Rate	June 30, 2019
Unsecured Debt
Duke Energy (Parent)	September 2019	5.050 %	$ 500
Duke Energy Kentucky	October 2019	4.650 %	100
Progress Energy	December 2019	4.875 %	350
Duke Energy (Parent)	June 2020	2.100 %	330
First Mortgage Bonds
Duke Energy Florida	January 2020	1.850 %	250
Duke Energy Florida	April 2020	4.550 %	250
Duke Energy Carolinas	June 2020	4.300 %	450
Other (a)			468
Current maturities of long-term debt			$ 2,698

(a) Includes finance lease obligations, amortizing debt and small bullet maturities.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES

AVAILABLE CREDIT FACILITIES

Master Credit Facility

In March 2019, Duke Energy amended its existing $ 8 billion Master Credit Facility to extend the termination date to March 2024 . The Duke Energy Registrants, excluding Progress Energy (Parent), have borrowing capacity under the Master Credit Facility up to a specified sublimit for each borrower. Duke Energy has the unilateral ability at any time to increase or decrease the borrowing sublimits of each borrower, subject to a maximum sublimit for each borrower. The amount available under the Master Credit Facility has been reduced to backstop issuances of commercial paper, certain letters of credit and variable-rate demand tax-exempt bonds that may be put to the Duke Energy Registrants at the option of the holder. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress are also required to each maintain $ 250 million of available capacity under the Master Credit Facility as security to meet obligations under plea agreements reached with the U.S. Department of Justice in 2015 related to violations at North Carolina facilities with ash basins. The table below includes the current borrowing sublimits and available capacity under the Master Credit Facility.

	June 30, 2019
			Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		(Parent)		Carolinas		Progress		Florida		Ohio		Indiana		Piedmont
Facility size (a)	$ 8,000		$ 2,650		$ 1,750		$ 1,250		$ 800		$ 450		$ 600		$ 500
Reduction to backstop issuances
Commercial paper (b)	( 3,420	)	( 1,009	)	( 1,099	)	( 276	)	( 474	)	( 236	)	( 326	)	—
Outstanding letters of credit	( 53	)	( 45	)	( 4	)	( 2	)	—		—		—		( 2	)
Tax-exempt bonds	( 81	)	—		—		—		—		—		( 81	)	—
Coal ash set-aside	( 500	)	—		( 250	)	( 250	)	—		—		—		—
Available capacity under the Master Credit Facility	$ 3,946		$ 1,596		$ 397		$ 722		$ 326		$ 214		$ 193		$ 498

(a) Represents the sublimit of each borrower.

(b) Duke Energy issued $ 625 million of commercial paper and loaned the proceeds through the money pool to Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. The balances are classified as Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Other Credit Facilities

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Facility size	Amount drawn
Duke Energy (Parent) Three-Year Revolving Credit Facility (a)	$ 1,000	$ 500
Duke Energy Progress Term Loan Facility (b)	700	700

(a) In May 2019, Duke Energy (Parent) extended the termination date to May 2022.

(b) $ 650 million was drawn under the term loan in January and February 2019.

In May 2019, the $ 350 million Piedmont term loan was paid off in full with proceeds from the $ 600 million Piedmont debt offering.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

7 . ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

The Duke Energy Registrants record AROs when there is a legal obligation to incur retirement costs associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset and the obligation can be reasonably estimated. Actual closure costs incurred could be materially different from current estimates that form the basis of the recorded AROs.

The following table presents the AROs recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Decommissioning of nuclear power facilities (a)	$ 5,807	$ 2,401	$ 3,265	$ 2,739	$ 526	$ —	$ —	$ —
Closure of ash impoundments	6,498	2,894	2,858	2,839	19	47	699	—
Other	323	47	70	38	32	42	20	19
Total ARO	$ 12,628	$ 5,342	$ 6,193	$ 5,616	$ 577	$ 89	$ 719	$ 19
Less: current portion	739	203	416	413	3	6	115	—
Total noncurrent ARO	$ 11,889	$ 5,139	$ 5,777	$ 5,203	$ 574	$ 83	$ 604	$ 19

(a) Duke Energy amount includes purchase accounting adjustments related to the merger with Progress Energy.

ARO Liability Rollforward

The following table presents the change in liability associated with AROs for the Duke Energy Registrants.

			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Ohio		Indiana		Piedmont
Balance at December 31, 2018 (a)	$ 10,467		$ 3,949		$ 5,411		$ 4,820		$ 591		$ 93		$ 722		$ 19
Accretion expense (b)	245		111		124		111		13		2		14		—
Liabilities settled (c)	( 404	)	( 155	)	( 225	)	( 197	)	( 28	)	( 6	)	( 17	)	—
Revisions in estimates of cash flows (d)	2,320		1,437		883		882		1		—		—		—
Balance at June 30, 2019	$ 12,628		$ 5,342		$ 6,193		$ 5,616		$ 577		$ 89		$ 719		$ 19

(a) Primarily relates to decommissioning nuclear power facilities, closure of ash impoundments, asbestos removal, closure of landfills at fossil generation facilities, retirement of natural gas mains and removal of renewable energy generation assets.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2019 , substantially all accretion expense relates to Duke Energy's regulated operations and has been deferred in accordance with regulatory accounting treatment.

(d) Relates to increases in closure estimates for certain ash impoundments as a result of the NCDEQ's April 1 Order. See Note 4 for more information. The incremental amount recorded represents the discounted cash flows for estimated closure costs based upon the probability weightings of the potential closure methods as evaluated on a site-by-site basis.

Asset retirement costs associated with the AROs for operating plants and retired plants are included in Net property, plant and equipment and Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds

Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida each maintain NDTFs that are intended to pay for the decommissioning costs of their respective nuclear power plants. The following table presents the fair value of NDTF assets legally restricted for purposes of settling AROs associated with nuclear decommissioning. Duke Energy Florida is actively decommissioning Crystal River Unit 3 and was granted an exemption from the NRC, which allows for use of the NDTF for all aspects of nuclear decommissioning. The entire balance of Duke Energy Florida's NDTF may be applied toward license termination, spent fuel and site restoration costs incurred to decommission Crystal River Unit 3 and is excluded from the table below. See Note 12 for additional information related to the fair value of the Duke Energy Registrants' NDTFs.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018
Duke Energy	$ 6,327	$ 5,579
Duke Energy Carolinas	3,574	3,133
Duke Energy Progress	2,753	2,446

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS GOODWILL

8 . GOODWILL

Duke Energy

The following table presents the goodwill by reportable segment included on Duke Energy's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 .

(in millions)	Electric Utilities — and Infrastructure	Gas Utilities — and Infrastructure	Commercial — Renewables		Total
Goodwill balance	$ 17,379	$ 1,924	$ 122		$ 19,425
Accumulated impairment charges	—	—	( 122	)	( 122	)
Goodwill, adjusted for accumulated impairment charges	$ 17,379	$ 1,924	$ —		$ 19,303

Duke Energy Ohio

Duke Energy Ohio's Goodwill balance of $ 920 million , allocated $ 596 million to Electric Utilities and Infrastructure and $ 324 million to Gas Utilities and Infrastructure, is presented net of accumulated impairment charges of $ 216 million on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 .

Progress Energy

Progress Energy's Goodwill is included in the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment and there are no accumulated impairment charges.

Piedmont

Piedmont's Goodwill is included in the Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment and there are no accumulated impairment charges.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

9 . RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Subsidiary Registrants engage in related party transactions in accordance with applicable state and federal commission regulations. Refer to the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Subsidiary Registrants for balances due to or due from related parties. Material amounts related to transactions with related parties included on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income are presented in the following table.

(in millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018
Duke Energy Carolinas
Corporate governance and shared service expenses (a)	$ 197	$ 213	$ 409	$ 433
Indemnification coverages (b)	5	5	10	11
JDA revenue (c)	17	19	40	53
JDA expense (c)	20	19	113	73
Intercompany natural gas purchases (d)	3	4	7	8
Progress Energy
Corporate governance and shared service expenses (a)	$ 183	$ 206	$ 359	$ 397
Indemnification coverages (b)	10	9	19	17
JDA revenue (c)	20	19	113	73
JDA expense (c)	17	19	40	53
Intercompany natural gas purchases (d)	19	19	38	38
Duke Energy Progress
Corporate governance and shared service expenses (a)	$ 108	$ 126	$ 214	$ 244
Indemnification coverages (b)	4	3	8	6
JDA revenue (c)	20	19	113	73
JDA expense (c)	17	19	40	53
Intercompany natural gas purchases (d)	19	19	38	38
Duke Energy Florida
Corporate governance and shared service expenses (a)	$ 75	$ 80	$ 145	$ 153
Indemnification coverages (b)	6	6	11	11
Duke Energy Ohio
Corporate governance and shared service expenses (a)	$ 83	$ 90	$ 168	$ 179
Indemnification coverages (b)	1	1	2	2
Duke Energy Indiana
Corporate governance and shared service expenses (a)	$ 93	$ 96	$ 190	$ 197
Indemnification coverages (b)	1	2	3	4
Piedmont
Corporate governance and shared service expenses (a)	$ 37	$ 40	$ 69	$ 76
Indemnification coverages (b)	—	—	1	1
Intercompany natural gas sales (d)	22	23	45	46
Natural gas storage and transportation costs (e)	6	6	11	12

(a) The Subsidiary Registrants are charged their proportionate share of corporate governance and other shared services costs, primarily related to human resources, employee benefits, information technology, legal and accounting fees, as well as other third-party costs. These amounts are primarily recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

(b) The Subsidiary Registrants incur expenses related to certain indemnification coverages through Bison, Duke Energy’s wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. These expenses are recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

(c) Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress participate in a JDA, which allows the collective dispatch of power plants between the service territories to reduce customer rates. Revenues from the sale of power and expenses from the purchase of power pursuant to the JDA are recorded in Operating Revenues and Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

(d) Piedmont provides long-term natural gas delivery service to certain Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress natural gas-fired generation facilities. Piedmont records the sales in Operating revenues, and Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress record the related purchases as a component of Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on their respective Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

(e) Piedmont has related party transactions as a customer of its equity method investments in Pine Needle, Hardy Storage, and Cardinal natural gas storage and transportation facilities. These expenses are included in Cost of natural gas on Piedmont's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In addition to the amounts presented above, the Subsidiary Registrants have other affiliate transactions, including rental of office space, participation in a money pool arrangement, other operational transactions and their proportionate share of certain charged expenses. These transactions of the Subsidiary Registrants are incurred in the ordinary course of business and are eliminated in consolidation.

As discussed in Note 13 , certain trade receivables have been sold by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana to CRC, an affiliate formed by a subsidiary of Duke Energy. The proceeds obtained from the sales of receivables are largely cash but do include a subordinated note from CRC for a portion of the purchase price.

Intercompany Income Taxes

Duke Energy and the Subsidiary Registrants file a consolidated federal income tax return and other state and jurisdictional returns. The Subsidiary Registrants have a tax sharing agreement with Duke Energy for the allocation of consolidated tax liabilities and benefits. Income taxes recorded represent amounts the Subsidiary Registrants would incur as separate C-Corporations. The following table includes the balance of intercompany income tax receivables and payables for the Subsidiary Registrants.

	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
June 30, 2019
Intercompany income tax receivable	$ —	$ 25	$ —	$ —	$ 15	$ —	$ 26
Intercompany income tax payable	76	—	41	19	—	1	—
December 31, 2018
Intercompany income tax receivable	$ 52	$ 47	$ 29	$ —	$ —	$ 8	$ —
Intercompany income tax payable	—	—	—	16	3	—	45

10 . DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

The Duke Energy Registrants use commodity and interest rate contracts to manage commodity price risk and interest rate risk. The primary use of commodity derivatives is to hedge the generation portfolio against changes in the prices of electricity and natural gas. Piedmont enters into natural gas supply contracts to provide diversification, reliability and natural gas cost benefits to its customers. Interest rate derivatives are used to manage interest rate risk associated with borrowings.

All derivative instruments not identified as NPNS are recorded at fair value as assets or liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collateral related to derivative instruments executed under master netting arrangements is offset against the collateralized derivatives on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash impacts of settled derivatives are recorded as operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

INTEREST RATE RISK

The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of their issuance or anticipated issuance of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and commercial paper. Interest rate risk is managed by limiting variable-rate exposures to a percentage of total debt and by monitoring changes in interest rates. To manage risk associated with changes in interest rates, the Duke Energy Registrants may enter into interest rate swaps, U.S. Treasury lock agreements and other financial contracts. In anticipation of certain fixed-rate debt issuances, a series of forward-starting interest rate swaps or Treasury locks may be executed to lock in components of current market interest rates. These instruments are later terminated prior to or upon the issuance of the corresponding debt.

Cash Flow Hedges

For a derivative designated as hedging the exposure to variable cash flows of a future transaction, referred to as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative's gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings once the future transaction impacts earnings. Amounts for interest rate contracts are reclassified to earnings as interest expense over the term of the related debt. Gains and losses reclassified out of AOCI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were not material. Duke Energy's interest rate derivatives designated as hedges include interest rate swaps used to hedge existing debt within the Commercial Renewables business and forward-starting interest rate swaps not accounted for under regulatory accounting.

Undesignated Contracts

Undesignated contracts primarily include contracts not designated as a hedge because they are accounted for under regulatory accounting or contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting.

Duke Energy’s interest rate swaps for its regulated operations employ regulatory accounting. With regulatory accounting, the mark-to-market gains or losses on the swaps are deferred as regulatory liabilities or regulatory assets, respectively. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the treatment of the related costs in the ratemaking process. The accrual of interest on the swaps is recorded as Interest Expense on the Duke Energy Registrant's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

The following table shows notional amounts of outstanding derivatives related to interest rate risk.

	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio
Cash flow hedges	$ 959	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Undesignated contracts	1,427	600	800	250	550	27
Total notional amount (a)	$ 2,386	$ 600	$ 800	$ 250	$ 550	$ 27

	December 31, 2018	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio
Cash flow hedges	$ 923	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Undesignated contracts	1,721	300	1,200	650	550	27
Total notional amount (a)	$ 2,644	$ 300	$ 1,200	$ 650	$ 550	$ 27

(a) Duke Energy includes amounts related to consolidated VIEs of $ 659 million in cash flow hedges as of June 30, 2019 , and $ 422 million in cash flow hedges and $ 194 million in undesignated contracts as of December 31, 2018 .

COMMODITY PRICE RISK

The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to the impact of changes in the prices of electricity purchased and sold in bulk power markets and coal and natural gas purchases, including Piedmont's natural gas supply contracts. Exposure to commodity price risk is influenced by a number of factors including the term of contracts, the liquidity of markets and delivery locations. For the Subsidiary Registrants, bulk power electricity and coal and natural gas purchases flow through fuel adjustment clauses, formula-based contracts or other cost-sharing mechanisms. Differences between the costs included in rates and the incurred costs, including undesignated derivative contracts, are largely deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. Piedmont policies allow for the use of financial instruments to hedge commodity price risks. The strategy and objective of these hedging programs are to use the financial instruments to reduce natural gas costs volatility for customers.

Volumes

The tables below include volumes of outstanding commodity derivatives. Amounts disclosed represent the absolute value of notional volumes of commodity contracts excluding NPNS. The Duke Energy Registrants have netted contractual amounts where offsetting purchase and sale contracts exist with identical delivery locations and times of delivery. Where all commodity positions are perfectly offset, no quantities are shown.

	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Electricity (GWh)	33,135	—	—	—	—	3,514	29,621	—
Natural gas (millions of dekatherms)	740	133	173	173	—	—	4	430

	December 31, 2018	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Electricity (GWh)	15,286	—	—	—	—	1,786	13,500	—
Natural gas (millions of dekatherms)	739	121	169	166	3	—	1	448

U.S. EQUITY SECURITIES RISK

In May 2019, Duke Energy Florida entered into a Decommissioning Services Agreement for the accelerated decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3 with ADP CR3, LLC and ADP SF1, LLC. The accelerated decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3 is subject to the approval of the NRC and the FPSC. Duke Energy Florida executed U.S. equity option collars within the NDTF in May 2019 to preserve the U.S. equity portfolio value in the Duke Energy Florida NDTF in the event the accelerated decommissioning is approved. These option collars were executed as a purchase of a put option and the sale of a call option on certain U.S. equity index funds. The put and call options create a collar to guarantee a minimum and maximum investment value for the Duke Energy Florida NDTF U.S. equity portfolio. The put and call options were entered into at zero-cost, with the price to purchase the puts offset entirely by the funds received to sell the calls. As of June 30, 2019, the aggregate notional amount of both the put and call options was 305,000 units in U.S. equity security index funds. The derivative balances associated with these equity options are immaterial as of June 30, 2019. The options are not designated as hedging instruments. Substantially all of Duke Energy Florida’s NDTF qualifies for regulatory accounting. With regulatory accounting, the mark-to-market gains or losses on the options are deferred as regulatory liabilities or regulatory assets, respectively.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

LOCATION AND FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES RECOGNIZED ON THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The following tables show the fair value and balance sheet location of derivative instruments. Although derivatives subject to master netting arrangements are netted on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, the fair values presented below are shown gross and cash collateral on the derivatives has not been netted against the fair values shown.

Derivative Assets	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	$ 37	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 7	$ 29	$ 2
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts	$ 37	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 7	$ 29	$ 2
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Noncurrent	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts	$ 1	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Total Derivative Assets	$ 38	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 7	$ 29	$ 2

Derivative Liabilities	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	$ 64	$ 31	$ 24	$ 24	$ —	$ —	$ 2	$ 7
Noncurrent	140	8	24	9	—	—	—	107
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts	$ 204	$ 39	$ 48	$ 33	$ —	$ —	$ 2	$ 114
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	$ 4	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Noncurrent	32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	86	54	31	2	29	1	—	—
Noncurrent	16	—	11	—	10	5	—	—
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts	$ 138	$ 54	$ 42	$ 2	$ 39	$ 6	$ —	$ —
Total Derivative Liabilities	$ 342	$ 93	$ 90	$ 35	$ 39	$ 6	$ 2	$ 114

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

Derivative Assets	December 31, 2018	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	$ 35	$ 2	$ 2	$ 2	$ —	$ 6	$ 23	$ 3
Noncurrent	4	1	2	2	—	—	—	—
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts	$ 39	$ 3	$ 4	$ 4	$ —	$ 6	$ 23	$ 3
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	$ 1	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Noncurrent	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Noncurrent	12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts	$ 18	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Total Derivative Assets	$ 57	$ 3	$ 4	$ 4	$ —	$ 6	$ 23	$ 3

Derivative Liabilities	December 31, 2018	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	$ 33	$ 14	$ 10	$ 5	$ 6	$ —	$ —	$ 8
Noncurrent	158	10	15	6	—	—	—	133
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts	$ 191	$ 24	$ 25	$ 11	$ 6	$ —	$ —	$ 141
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	$ 12	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Noncurrent	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current	23	9	13	11	2	1	—	—
Noncurrent	10	—	6	5	1	4	—	—
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts	$ 51	$ 9	$ 19	$ 16	$ 3	$ 5	$ —	$ —
Total Derivative Liabilities	$ 242	$ 33	$ 44	$ 27	$ 9	$ 5	$ —	$ 141

OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The following tables present the line items on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets where derivatives are reported. Substantially all of Duke Energy's outstanding derivative contracts are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements. The gross amounts offset in the tables below show the effect of these netting arrangements on financial position, and include collateral posted to offset the net position. The amounts shown are calculated by counterparty. Accounts receivable or accounts payable may also be available to offset exposures in the event of bankruptcy. These amounts are not included in the tables below.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

Derivative Assets	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized	$ 37	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 7	$ 29	$ 2
Gross amounts offset	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other	$ 37	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 7	$ 29	$ 2
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized	$ 1	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Gross amounts offset	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other	$ 1	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —

Derivative Liabilities	June 30, 2019
			Duke			Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke		Energy	Progress		Energy		Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas	Energy		Progress		Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized	$ 154		$ 85	$ 55		$ 26		$ 29	$ 1	$ 2	$ 7
Gross amounts offset	( 1	)	—	( 1	)	( 1	)	—	—	—	—
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other	$ 153		$ 85	$ 54		$ 25		$ 29	$ 1	$ 2	$ 7
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized	$ 188		$ 8	$ 35		$ 9		$ 10	$ 5	$ —	$ 107
Gross amounts offset	—		—	—		—		—	—	—	—
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other	$ 188		$ 8	$ 35		$ 9		$ 10	$ 5	$ —	$ 107

Derivative Assets	December 31, 2018
			Duke				Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized	$ 38		$ 2		$ 2		$ 2		$ —	$ 6	$ 23	$ 3
Gross amounts offset	( 3	)	( 2	)	( 2	)	( 2	)	—	—	—	—
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other	$ 35		$ —		$ —		$ —		$ —	$ 6	$ 23	$ 3
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized	$ 19		$ 1		$ 2		$ 2		$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Gross amounts offset	( 3	)	( 1	)	( 2	)	( 2	)	—	—	—	—
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other	$ 16		$ —		$ —		$ —		$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

Derivative Liabilities	December 31, 2018
			Duke				Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized	$ 68		$ 23		$ 23		$ 16		$ 8	$ 1	$ —	$ 8
Gross amounts offset	( 4	)	( 2	)	( 2	)	( 2	)	—	—	—	—
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other	$ 64		$ 21		$ 21		$ 14		$ 8	$ 1	$ —	$ 8
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized	$ 174		$ 10		$ 21		$ 11		$ 1	$ 4	$ —	$ 133
Gross amounts offset	( 3	)	( 1	)	( 2	)	( 2	)	—	—	—	—
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other	$ 171		$ 9		$ 19		$ 9		$ 1	$ 4	$ —	$ 133

OBJECTIVE CREDIT CONTINGENT FEATURES

Certain derivative contracts contain objective credit contingent features. These features include the requirement to post cash collateral or letters of credit if specific events occur, such as a credit rating downgrade below investment grade. The following tables show information with respect to derivative contracts that are in a net liability position and contain objective credit-risk-related payment provisions.

	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position	$ 67	$ 34	$ 33	$ 33
Fair value of collateral already posted	—	—	—	—
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered	67	34	33	33

	December 31, 2018	Duke		Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position	$ 44	$ 19	$ 25	$ 25
Fair value of collateral already posted	—	—	—	—
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered	44	19	25	25

The Duke Energy Registrants have elected to offset cash collateral and fair values of derivatives. For amounts to be netted, the derivative and cash collateral must be executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement.

11 . INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES

Duke Energy’s investments in debt and equity securities are primarily comprised of investments held in (i) the NDTF at Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, (ii) the grantor trusts at Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana related to OPEB plans and (iii) Bison. The Duke Energy Registrants classify investments in debt securities as AFS and investments in equity securities as FV-NI.

For investments in debt securities classified as AFS, the unrealized gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income until realized, at which time, they are reported through net income. For investments in equity securities classified as FV-NI, both realized and unrealized gains and losses are reported through net income. Substantially all of Duke Energy’s investments in debt and equity securities qualify for regulatory accounting, and accordingly, all associated realized and unrealized gains and losses on these investments are deferred as a regulatory asset or liability.

Duke Energy classifies the majority of investments in debt and equity securities as long term, unless otherwise noted.

Investment Trusts

The investments within the Investment Trusts are managed by independent investment managers with discretion to buy, sell and invest pursuant to the objectives set forth by the trust agreements. The Duke Energy Registrants have limited oversight of the day-to-day management of these investments. As a result, the ability to hold investments in unrealized loss positions is outside the control of the Duke Energy Registrants. Accordingly, all unrealized losses associated with debt securities within the Investment Trusts are considered OTTIs and are recognized immediately and deferred to regulatory accounts where appropriate.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES

Other AFS Securities

Unrealized gains and losses on all other AFS securities are included in other comprehensive income until realized, unless it is determined the carrying value of an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. The Duke Energy Registrants analyze all investment holdings each reporting period to determine whether a decline in fair value should be considered other-than-temporary. If an OTTI exists, the unrealized credit loss is included in earnings. There were no material credit losses as of June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 .

Other Investments amounts are recorded in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

DUKE ENERGY

The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.

	June 30, 2019 — Gross	Gross		December 31, 2018 — Gross	Gross
	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated
	Holding	Holding	Fair	Holding	Holding	Fair
(in millions)	Gains	Losses	Value	Gains	Losses	Value
NDTF
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 114	$ —	$ —	$ 88
Equity securities	3,076	36	5,178	2,402	95	4,475
Corporate debt securities	30	1	571	4	13	566
Municipal bonds	10	—	318	1	4	353
U.S. government bonds	34	1	1,270	14	12	1,076
Other debt securities	3	1	152	—	2	148
Total NDTF Investments	$ 3,153	$ 39	$ 7,603	$ 2,421	$ 126	$ 6,706
Other Investments
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 49	$ —	$ —	$ 22
Equity securities	49	—	112	36	1	99
Corporate debt securities	2	—	60	—	2	60
Municipal bonds	3	1	90	—	1	85
U.S. government bonds	2	—	51	1	—	45
Other debt securities	—	—	65	—	1	58
Total Other Investments	$ 56	$ 1	$ 427	$ 37	$ 5	$ 369
Total Investments	$ 3,209	$ 40	$ 8,030	$ 2,458	$ 131	$ 7,075

Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018, were as follows.

(in millions)	Three Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018	Six Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018
FV-NI:
Realized gains	$ 66	$ 47	$ 101	$ 66
Realized losses	63	31	93	44
AFS:
Realized gains	47	5	57	10
Realized losses	36	12	47	25

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES

DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS

The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.

	June 30, 2019 — Gross	Gross		December 31, 2018 — Gross	Gross
	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated
	Holding	Holding	Fair	Holding	Holding	Fair
(in millions)	Gains	Losses	Value	Gains	Losses	Value
NDTF
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 41	$ —	$ —	$ 29
Equity securities	1,671	9	2,883	1,309	54	2,484
Corporate debt securities	18	1	360	2	9	341
Municipal bonds	2	—	63	—	1	81
U.S. government bonds	17	1	556	5	8	475
Other debt securities	3	1	141	—	2	143
Total NDTF Investments	$ 1,711	$ 12	$ 4,044	$ 1,316	$ 74	$ 3,553

(in millions)	Three Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018	Six Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018
FV-NI:
Realized gains	$ 44	$ 26	$ 67	$ 36
Realized losses	48	17	69	22
AFS:
Realized gains	16	4	25	9
Realized losses	11	8	21	18

PROGRESS ENERGY

The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.

	June 30, 2019 — Gross	Gross		December 31, 2018 — Gross	Gross
	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated
	Holding	Holding	Fair	Holding	Holding	Fair
(in millions)	Gains	Losses	Value	Gains	Losses	Value
NDTF
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 73	$ —	$ —	$ 59
Equity securities	1,405	27	2,295	1,093	41	1,991
Corporate debt securities	12	—	211	2	4	225
Municipal bonds	8	—	255	1	3	272
U.S. government bonds	17	—	714	9	4	601
Other debt securities	—	—	11	—	—	5
Total NDTF Investments	$ 1,442	$ 27	$ 3,559	$ 1,105	$ 52	$ 3,153
Other Investments
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 47	$ —	$ —	$ 17
Municipal bonds	3	—	50	—	—	47
Total Other Investments	$ 3	$ —	$ 97	$ —	$ —	$ 64
Total Investments	$ 1,445	$ 27	$ 3,656	$ 1,105	$ 52	$ 3,217

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES

(in millions)	Three Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018	Six Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018
FV-NI:
Realized gains	$ 22	$ 21	$ 34	$ 30
Realized losses	15	14	24	22
AFS:
Realized gains	30	1	31	1
Realized losses	25	4	26	7

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS

The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.

	June 30, 2019 — Gross	Gross		December 31, 2018 — Gross	Gross
	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated
	Holding	Holding	Fair	Holding	Holding	Fair
(in millions)	Gains	Losses	Value	Gains	Losses	Value
NDTF
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 42	$ —	$ —	$ 46
Equity securities	1,092	24	1,886	833	30	1,588
Corporate debt securities	12	—	211	2	3	171
Municipal bonds	8	—	255	1	3	271
U.S. government bonds	16	—	429	6	3	415
Other debt securities	—	—	11	—	—	3
Total NDTF Investments	$ 1,128	$ 24	$ 2,834	$ 842	$ 39	$ 2,494
Other Investments
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 2	$ —	$ —	$ 6
Total Other Investments	$ —	$ —	$ 2	$ —	$ —	$ 6
Total Investments	$ 1,128	$ 24	$ 2,836	$ 842	$ 39	$ 2,500

(in millions)	Three Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018	Six Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018
FV-NI:
Realized gains	$ 7	$ 17	$ 17	$ 25
Realized losses	7	12	15	20
AFS:
Realized gains	1	1	2	1
Realized losses	1	3	2	5

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA

The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.

	June 30, 2019 — Gross	Gross		December 31, 2018 — Gross	Gross
	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated
	Holding	Holding	Fair	Holding	Holding	Fair
(in millions)	Gains	Losses	Value	Gains	Losses	Value
NDTF
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 31	$ —	$ —	$ 13
Equity securities	313	3	409	260	11	403
Corporate debt securities	—	—	—	—	1	54
Municipal bonds	—	—	—	—	—	1
U.S. government bonds	1	—	285	3	1	186
Other debt securities	—	—	—	—	—	2
Total NDTF Investments (a)	$ 314	$ 3	$ 725	$ 263	$ 13	$ 659
Other Investments
Cash and cash equivalents	$ —	$ —	$ 2	$ —	$ —	$ 1
Municipal bonds	3	—	50	—	—	47
Total Other Investments	$ 3	$ —	$ 52	$ —	$ —	$ 48
Total Investments	$ 317	$ 3	$ 777	$ 263	$ 13	$ 707

(a) During the six months ended June 30, 2019 , Duke Energy Florida continued to receive reimbursements from the NDTF for costs related to ongoing decommissioning activity of Crystal River Unit 3.

(in millions)	Three Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018	Six Months Ended — June 30, 2019	June 30, 2018
FV-NI:
Realized gains	$ 15	$ 4	$ 17	$ 5
Realized losses	8	2	9	2
AFS:
Realized gains	29	—	29	—
Realized losses	24	1	24	2

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA

The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are measured at FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.

	June 30, 2019 — Gross	Gross		December 31, 2018 — Gross	Gross
	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated	Unrealized	Unrealized	Estimated
	Holding	Holding	Fair	Holding	Holding	Fair
(in millions)	Gains	Losses	Value	Gains	Losses	Value
Investments
Equity securities	$ 37	$ —	$ 74	$ 29	$ —	$ 67
Corporate debt securities	—	—	7	—	—	8
Municipal bonds	—	1	34	—	1	33
U.S. government bonds	—	—	1	—	—	—
Total Investments	$ 37	$ 1	$ 116	$ 29	$ 1	$ 108

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES

DEBT SECURITY MATURITIES

The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.

	June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke
	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Indiana
Due in one year or less	$ 365	$ 43	$ 315	$ 29	$ 286	$ 4
Due after one through five years	527	213	265	257	8	15
Due after five through 10 years	499	242	203	192	11	4
Due after 10 years	1,186	622	458	428	30	19
Total	$ 2,577	$ 1,120	$ 1,241	$ 906	$ 335	$ 42

12 . FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is the exchange price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value definition focuses on an exit price versus the acquisition cost. Fair value measurements use market data or assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs may be readily observable, corroborated by market data or generally unobservable. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize use of unobservable inputs. A midmarket pricing convention (the midpoint price between bid and ask prices) is permitted for use as a practical expedient.

Fair value measurements are classified in three levels based on the fair value hierarchy as defined by GAAP. Certain investments are not categorized within the fair value hierarchy. These investments are measured at fair value using the NAV per share practical expedient. The NAV is derived based on the investment cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer.

Fair value accounting guidance permits entities to elect to measure certain financial instruments that are not required to be accounted for at fair value, such as equity method investments or the company’s own debt, at fair value. The Duke Energy Registrants have not elected to record any of these items at fair value.

Transfers between levels represent assets or liabilities that were previously (i) categorized at a higher level for which the inputs to the estimate became less observable or (ii) classified at a lower level for which the inputs became more observable during the period. The Duke Energy Registrant’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy at the end of the period. There were no transfers between levels during the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 .

Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed below are as follows.

Investments in equity securities

The majority of investments in equity securities are valued using Level 1 measurements. Investments in equity securities are typically valued at the closing price in the principal active market as of the last business day of the quarter. Principal active markets for equity prices include published exchanges such as the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq Stock Market. Foreign equity prices are translated from their trading currency using the currency exchange rate in effect at the close of the principal active market. There was no after-hours market activity that was required to be reflected in the reported fair value measurements.

Investments in debt securities

Most investments in debt securities are valued using Level 2 measurements because the valuations use interest rate curves and credit spreads applied to the terms of the debt instrument (maturity and coupon interest rate) and consider the counterparty credit rating. If the market for a particular fixed-income security is relatively inactive or illiquid, the measurement is Level 3.

Commodity derivatives

Commodity derivatives with clearinghouses are classified as Level 1. Other commodity derivatives, including Piedmont's natural gas supply contracts, are primarily valued using internally developed discounted cash flow models that incorporate forward price, adjustments for liquidity (bid-ask spread) and credit or non-performance risk (after reflecting credit enhancements such as collateral), and are discounted to present value. Pricing inputs are derived from published exchange transaction prices and other observable data sources. In the absence of an active market, the last available price may be used. If forward price curves are not observable for the full term of the contract and the unobservable period had more than an insignificant impact on the valuation, the commodity derivative is classified as Level 3. In isolation, increases (decreases) in natural gas forward prices result in favorable (unfavorable) fair value adjustments for natural gas purchase contracts; and increases (decreases) in electricity forward prices result in unfavorable (favorable) fair value adjustments for electricity sales contracts. Duke Energy regularly evaluates and validates pricing inputs used to estimate the fair value of natural gas commodity contracts by a market participant price verification procedure. This procedure provides a comparison of internal forward commodity curves to market participant generated curves.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Interest rate derivatives

Most over-the-counter interest rate contract derivatives are valued using financial models that utilize observable inputs for similar instruments and are classified as Level 2. Inputs include forward interest rate curves, notional amounts, interest rates and credit quality of the counterparties.

Other fair value considerations

See Note 11 in Duke Energy's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for a discussion of the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets.

DUKE ENERGY

The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative amounts in the tables below for all Duke Energy Registrants exclude cash collateral, which is disclosed in Note 10 . See Note 11 for additional information related to investments by major security type for the Duke Energy Registrants.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Not Categorized
NDTF equity securities	$ 5,178		$ 5,119		$ —		$ —		$ 59
NDTF debt securities	2,425		870		1,555		—		—
Other equity securities	112		112		—		—		—
Other debt securities	315		99		216		—		—
Derivative assets	38		3		—		35		—
Total assets	8,068		6,203		1,771		35		59
Derivative liabilities	( 342	)	( 12	)	( 216	)	( 114	)	—
Net assets (liabilities)	$ 7,726		$ 6,191		$ 1,555		$ ( 79	)	$ 59

(in millions)	December 31, 2018 — Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Not Categorized
NDTF equity securities	$ 4,475		$ 4,410		$ —		$ —		$ 65
NDTF debt securities	2,231		576		1,655		—		—
Other equity securities	99		99		—		—		—
Other debt securities	270		67		203		—		—
Derivative assets	57		4		25		28		—
Total assets	7,132		5,156		1,883		28		65
Derivative liabilities	( 242	)	( 11	)	( 90	)	( 141	)	—
Net assets (liabilities)	$ 6,890		$ 5,145		$ 1,793		$ ( 113	)	$ 65

The following tables provide reconciliations of beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.

	Derivatives (net)
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Balance at beginning of period	$ ( 115	)	$ ( 124	)	$ ( 113	)	$ ( 114	)
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:
Purchases	38		56		38		56
Settlements	( 11	)	( 15	)	( 23	)	( 29	)
Total gains (losses) included on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet	9		( 14	)	19		( 10	)
Balance at end of period	$ ( 79	)	$ ( 97	)	$ ( 79	)	$ ( 97	)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS

The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 2		Not Categorized
NDTF equity securities	$ 2,883		$ 2,824	$ —		$ 59
NDTF debt securities	1,161		250	911		—
Total assets	4,044		3,074	911		59
Derivative liabilities	( 93	)	—	( 93	)	—
Net assets	$ 3,951		$ 3,074	$ 818		$ 59

(in millions)	December 31, 2018 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 2		Not Categorized
NDTF equity securities	$ 2,484		$ 2,419	$ —		$ 65
NDTF debt securities	1,069		149	920		—
Derivative assets	3		—	3		—
Total assets	3,556		2,568	923		65
Derivative liabilities	( 33	)	—	( 33	)	—
Net assets	$ 3,523		$ 2,568	$ 890		$ 65

PROGRESS ENERGY

The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 2		December 31, 2018 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 2
NDTF equity securities	$ 2,295		$ 2,295	$ —		$ 1,991		$ 1,991	$ —
NDTF debt securities	1,264		620	644		1,162		427	735
Other debt securities	97		47	50		64		17	47
Derivative assets	—		—	—		4		—	4
Total assets	3,656		2,962	694		3,221		2,435	786
Derivative liabilities	( 90	)	—	( 90	)	( 44	)	—	( 44	)
Net assets	$ 3,566		$ 2,962	$ 604		$ 3,177		$ 2,435	$ 742

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS

The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 2		December 31, 2018 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 2
NDTF equity securities	$ 1,886		$ 1,886	$ —		$ 1,588		$ 1,588	$ —
NDTF debt securities	948		304	644		906		294	612
Other debt securities	2		2	—		6		6	—
Derivative assets	—		—	—		4		—	4
Total assets	2,836		2,192	644		2,504		1,888	616
Derivative liabilities	( 35	)	—	( 35	)	( 27	)	—	( 27	)
Net assets	$ 2,801		$ 2,192	$ 609		$ 2,477		$ 1,888	$ 589

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA

The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 2		December 31, 2018 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 2
NDTF equity securities	$ 409		$ 409	$ —		$ 403		$ 403	$ —
NDTF debt securities	316		316	—		256		133	123
Other debt securities	52		2	50		48		1	47
Total assets	777		727	50		707		537	170
Derivative liabilities	( 39	)	—	( 39	)	( 9	)	—	( 9	)
Net assets	$ 738		$ 727	$ 11		$ 698		$ 537	$ 161

DUKE ENERGY OHIO

The recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were not material at June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 .

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA

The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2	Level 3	December 31, 2018 — Total Fair Value	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
Other equity securities	$ 74		$ 74		$ —	$ —	$ 67	$ 67	$ —	$ —
Other debt securities	42		—		42	—	41	—	41	—
Derivative assets	29		1		—	28	23	1	—	22
Total assets	$ 145		$ 75		$ 42	$ 28	$ 131	$ 68	$ 41	$ 22
Derivative liabilities	( 2	)	( 2	)	—	—	—	—	—	—
Net assets	$ 143		$ 73		$ 42	$ 28	$ 131	$ 68	$ 41	$ 22

The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.

	Derivatives (net)
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Balance at beginning of period	$ 5		$ 7		$ 22		$ 27
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:
Purchases	29		49		29		49
Settlements	( 9	)	( 14	)	( 19	)	( 28	)
Total gains (losses) included on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet	3		2		( 4	)	( 4	)
Balance at end of period	$ 28		$ 44		$ 28		$ 44

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

PIEDMONT

The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 3		December 31, 2018 — Total Fair Value		Level 1	Level 3
Derivative assets	$ 2		$ 2	$ —		$ 3		3	—
Derivative liabilities	( 114	)	—	( 114	)	( 141	)	—	( 141	)
Net (liabilities) assets	$ ( 112	)	$ 2	$ ( 114	)	$ ( 138	)	$ 3	$ ( 141	)

The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.

	Derivatives (net)
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Balance at beginning of period	$ ( 121	)	$ ( 132	)	$ ( 141	)	$ ( 142	)
Total gains (losses) and settlements	7		( 18	)	27		( 8	)
Balance at end of period	$ ( 114	)	$ ( 150	)	$ ( 114	)	$ ( 150	)

QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS

The following tables include quantitative information about the Duke Energy Registrants' derivatives classified as Level 3.

	June 30, 2019
	Fair Value
Investment Type	(in millions)		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range
Duke Energy Ohio
FTRs	$ 7		RTO auction pricing	FTR price – per MWh	$ 0.36		-	$ 3.13
Duke Energy Indiana
FTRs	28		RTO auction pricing	FTR price – per MWh	( 0.59	)	-	7.61
Piedmont
Natural gas contracts	( 114	)	Discounted cash flow	Forward natural gas curves – price per MMBtu	1.96		-	3.21
Duke Energy
Total Level 3 derivatives	$ ( 79	)

	December 31, 2018
	Fair Value
Investment Type	(in millions)		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range
Duke Energy Ohio
FTRs	$ 6		RTO auction pricing	FTR price – per MWh	$ 1.19		-	$ 4.59
Duke Energy Indiana
FTRs	22		RTO auction pricing	FTR price – per MWh	( 2.07	)	-	8.27
Piedmont
Natural gas contracts	( 141	)	Discounted cash flow	Forward natural gas curves – price per MMBtu	1.87		-	2.95
Duke Energy
Total Level 3 derivatives	$ ( 113	)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

OTHER FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

The fair value and book value of long-term debt, including current maturities, is summarized in the following table. Estimates determined are not necessarily indicative of amounts that could have been settled in current markets. Fair value of long-term debt uses Level 2 measurements.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019 — Book Value	Fair Value	December 31, 2018 — Book Value	Fair Value
Duke Energy (a)	$ 57,040	$ 60,667	$ 54,529	$ 54,534
Duke Energy Carolinas	10,964	12,300	10,939	11,471
Progress Energy	19,199	21,408	18,911	19,885
Duke Energy Progress	9,049	9,707	8,204	8,300
Duke Energy Florida	7,213	8,173	7,321	7,742
Duke Energy Ohio	2,509	2,779	2,165	2,239
Duke Energy Indiana	3,723	4,363	3,782	4,158
Piedmont	2,384	2,576	2,138	2,180

(a) Book value of long-term debt includes $ 1.5 billion as of June 30, 2019 , and $ 1.6 billion as of December 31, 2018 , of unamortized debt discount and premium, net in purchase accounting adjustments related to the mergers with Progress Energy and Piedmont that are excluded from fair value of long-term debt.

At both June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 , fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and commercial paper, and nonrecourse notes payable of VIEs are not materially different from their carrying amounts because of the short-term nature of these instruments and/or because the stated rates approximate market rates.

13 . VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

CONSOLIDATED VIEs

The obligations of the consolidated VIEs discussed in the following paragraphs are nonrecourse to the Duke Energy registrants. The registrants have no requirement to provide liquidity to, purchase assets of or guarantee performance of these VIEs unless noted in the following paragraphs.

No financial support was provided to any of the consolidated VIEs during the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and the year ended December 31, 2018 , or is expected to be provided in the future that was not previously contractually required.

Receivables Financing – DERF / DEPR / DEFR

DERF, DEPR and DEFR are bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiaries of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively. DERF, DEPR and DEFR are wholly owned limited liability companies with separate legal existence from their parent companies, and their assets are not generally available to creditors of their parent companies. On a revolving basis, DERF, DEPR and DEFR buy certain accounts receivable arising from the sale of electricity and related services from their parent companies.

DERF, DEPR and DEFR borrow amounts under credit facilities to buy these receivables. Borrowing availability from the credit facilities is limited to the amount of qualified receivables purchased. The sole source of funds to satisfy the related debt obligations is cash collections from the receivables. Amounts borrowed under the credit facilities are reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-Term Debt.

The most significant activity that impacts the economic performance of DERF, DEPR and DEFR are the decisions made to manage delinquent receivables. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are considered primary beneficiaries and consolidate DERF, DEPR and DEFR, respectively, as they make those decisions.

Receivables Financing – CRC

CRC is a bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity indirectly owned by Duke Energy. On a revolving basis, CRC buys certain accounts receivable arising from the sale of electricity, natural gas and related services from Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. CRC borrows amounts under a credit facility to buy the receivables from Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. Borrowing availability from the credit facility is limited to the amount of qualified receivables sold to CRC. The sole source of funds to satisfy the related debt obligation is cash collections from the receivables. Amounts borrowed under the credit facility are reflected on Duke Energy's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-Term Debt.

The proceeds Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana receive from the sale of receivables to CRC are approximately 75 percent cash and 25 percent in the form of a subordinated note from CRC. The subordinated note is a retained interest in the receivables sold. Depending on collection experience, additional equity infusions to CRC may be required by Duke Energy to maintain a minimum equity balance of $ 3 million .

CRC is considered a VIE because (i) equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations, (ii) power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity are not performed by the equity holder and (iii) deficiencies in net worth of CRC are funded by Duke Energy. The most significant activities that impact the economic performance of CRC are decisions made to manage delinquent receivables. Duke Energy is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates CRC as it makes these decisions. Neither Duke Energy Ohio nor Duke Energy Indiana consolidate CRC.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Receivables Financing – Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes the amounts and expiration dates of the credit facilities and associated restricted receivables described above.

	Duke Energy	Duke Energy	Duke Energy	Duke Energy
		Carolinas	Progress	Florida
(in millions)	CRC	DERF	DEPR	DEFR
Expiration date	December 2020	December 2020	February 2021	April 2021
Credit facility amount	$ 350	$ 475	$ 325	$ 250
Amounts borrowed at June 30, 2019	328	475	325	250
Amounts borrowed at December 31, 2018	325	450	300	225
Restricted Receivables at June 30, 2019	484	671	518	472
Restricted Receivables at December 31, 2018	564	699	547	357

Nuclear Asset-Recovery Bonds – DEFPF

DEFPF is a bankruptcy remote, wholly owned special purpose subsidiary of Duke Energy Florida. DEFPF was formed in 2016 for the sole purpose of issuing nuclear asset-recovery bonds to finance Duke Energy Florida's unrecovered regulatory asset related to Crystal River Unit 3.

In June 2016, DEFPF issued senior secured bonds and used the proceeds to acquire nuclear asset-recovery property from Duke Energy Florida. The nuclear asset-recovery property acquired includes the right to impose, bill, collect and adjust a non-bypassable nuclear asset-recovery charge from all Duke Energy Florida retail customers until the bonds are paid in full and all financing costs have been recovered. The nuclear asset-recovery bonds are secured by the nuclear asset-recovery property, and cash collections from the nuclear asset-recovery charges are the sole source of funds to satisfy the debt obligation. The bondholders have no recourse to Duke Energy Florida.

DEFPF is considered a VIE primarily because the equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations. Duke Energy Florida has the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE as described above, and therefore Duke Energy Florida is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates DEFPF.

The following table summarizes the impact of DEFPF on Duke Energy Florida's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018
Receivables of VIEs	$ 8	$ 5
Regulatory Assets: Current	52	52
Current Assets: Other	31	39
Other Noncurrent Assets: Regulatory assets	1,019	1,041
Current Liabilities: Other	10	10
Current maturities of long-term debt	54	53
Long-Term Debt	1,082	1,111

Commercial Renewables

Certain of Duke Energy’s renewable energy facilities are VIEs due to Duke Energy issuing guarantees for debt service and operations and maintenance reserves in support of debt financings. Assets are restricted and cannot be pledged as collateral or sold to third parties without prior approval of debt holders. Additionally, Duke Energy has VIEs associated with tax equity arrangements entered into with third-party investors in order to finance the cost of solar energy systems eligible for tax credits. The activities that most significantly impacted the economic performance of these renewable energy facilities were decisions associated with siting, negotiating PPAs and EPC agreements, and decisions associated with ongoing operations and maintenance-related activities. Duke Energy is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates the entities as it is responsible for all of these decisions.

The table below presents material balances reported on Duke Energy's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to renewables VIEs.

(in millions) — Current Assets: Other	June 30, 2019 — $ 109		December 31, 2018 — $ 123
Property, plant and equipment, cost	4,419		4,007
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	( 769	)	( 698	)
Other Noncurrent Assets: Other	289		261
Current maturities of long-term debt	178		174
Long-Term Debt	1,610		1,587
Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Asset Retirement Obligations	108		106
Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other	222		212

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

NON-CONSOLIDATED VIEs

The following tables summarize the impact of non-consolidated VIEs on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	June 30, 2019
	Duke Energy						Duke	Duke
	Pipeline		Commercial	Other			Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Investments		Renewables	VIEs	Total		Ohio	Indiana
Receivables from affiliated companies	$ —		$ —	$ —	$ —		$ 45	$ 81
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates	1,066		187	52	1,305		—	—
Total assets	$ 1,066		$ 187	$ 52	$ 1,305		$ 45	$ 81
Taxes accrued	( 2	)	—	—	( 2	)	—	—
Other current liabilities	—		—	4	4		—	—
Deferred income taxes	48		—	—	48		—	—
Other noncurrent liabilities	—		—	11	11		—	—
Total liabilities	$ 46		$ —	$ 15	$ 61		$ —	$ —
Net assets	$ 1,020		$ 187	$ 37	$ 1,244		$ 45	$ 81

	December 31, 2018
	Duke Energy						Duke	Duke
	Pipeline		Commercial	Other			Energy	Energy
(in millions)	Investments		Renewables	VIEs	Total		Ohio	Indiana
Receivables from affiliated companies	$ —		$ —	$ —	$ —		$ 93	$ 118
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates	822		190	48	1,060		—	—
Total assets	$ 822		$ 190	$ 48	$ 1,060		$ 93	$ 118
Taxes accrued	( 1	)	—	—	( 1	)	—	—
Other current liabilities	—		—	4	4		—	—
Deferred income taxes	21		—	—	21		—	—
Other noncurrent liabilities	—		—	12	12		—	—
Total liabilities	$ 20		$ —	$ 16	$ 36		$ —	$ —
Net assets	$ 802		$ 190	$ 32	$ 1,024		$ 93	$ 118

The Duke Energy Registrants are not aware of any situations where the maximum exposure to loss significantly exceeds the carrying values shown above except for the power purchase agreement with OVEC, which is discussed below, and various guarantees, including Duke Energy's guarantee agreement to support its share of the ACP revolving credit facility. Duke Energy's maximum exposure to loss under the terms of the guarantee is $ 790 million , which represents 47 percent of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility as of June 30, 2019 . For more information on various guarantees, refer to Note 4 .

Pipeline Investments

Duke Energy has investments in various joint ventures with pipeline projects currently under construction. These entities are considered VIEs due to having insufficient equity to finance their own activities without subordinated financial support. Duke Energy does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of these VIEs and therefore does not consolidate these entities.

The table below presents Duke Energy's ownership interest and investment balances in these joint ventures.

	Ownership	VIE Investment Amount (in millions) — June 30,	December 31,
Entity Name	Interest	2019	2018
ACP (a)	47 %	$ 1,041	$ 797
Constitution	24 %	25	25
Total		$ 1,066	$ 822

(a) Duke Energy evaluated this investment for impairment as of June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 , and determined that fair value approximated carrying value and therefore no impairment was necessary.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Commercial Renewables

Duke Energy has investments in various renewable energy project entities. Some of these entities are VIEs due to Duke Energy issuing guarantees for debt service and operations and maintenance reserves in support of debt financings. Duke Energy does not consolidate these VIEs because power to direct and control key activities is shared jointly by Duke Energy and other owners.

Pioneer

Duke Energy holds a 50 percent equity interest in Pioneer. Pioneer is considered a VIE due to having insufficient equity to finance its own activities without subordinated financial support. The activities that most significantly impact Pioneer's economic performance are decisions related to the development of new transmission facilities. The power to direct these activities is jointly and equally shared by Duke Energy and the other joint venture partner, American Electric Power; therefore, Duke Energy does not consolidate Pioneer.

OVEC

Duke Energy Ohio’s 9 percent ownership interest in OVEC is considered a non-consolidated VIE due to OVEC having insufficient equity to finance its activities without subordinated financial support. The activities that most significantly impact OVEC's economic performance include fuel strategy and supply activities and decisions associated with ongoing operations and maintenance-related activities. Duke Energy Ohio does not have the unilateral power to direct these activities, and therefore, does not consolidate OVEC.

As a counterparty to an ICPA, Duke Energy Ohio has a contractual arrangement to receive entitlements to capacity and energy from OVEC’s power plants through June 2040 commensurate with its power participation ratio, which is equivalent to Duke Energy Ohio's ownership interest. Costs, including fuel, operating expenses, fixed costs, debt amortization and interest expense, are allocated to counterparties to the ICPA based on their power participation ratio. The value of the ICPA is subject to variability due to fluctuation in power prices and changes in OVEC's cost of business. On March 31, 2018, FES, a subsidiary of FirstEnergy and an ICPA counterparty with a power participation ratio of 4.85 percent, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which could increase costs allocated to the counterparties. On July 31, 2018, the bankruptcy court rejected the FES ICPA, which means OVEC is an unsecured creditor in the FES bankruptcy proceeding. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the impact of the bankruptcy filing on its OVEC interests. In addition, certain proposed environmental rulemaking could result in future increased OVEC cost allocations.

CRC

See discussion under Consolidated VIEs for additional information related to CRC.

Amounts included in Receivables from affiliated companies in the above table for Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana reflect their retained interest in receivables sold to CRC. These subordinated notes held by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana are stated at fair value.

The following table shows the gross and net receivables sold.

(in millions)	Duke Energy Ohio — June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018	Duke Energy Indiana — June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018
Receivables sold	$ 210	$ 269	$ 314	$ 336
Less: Retained interests	45	93	81	118
Net receivables sold	$ 165	$ 176	$ 233	$ 218

The following table shows sales and cash flows related to receivables sold.

	Duke Energy Ohio — Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended		Duke Energy Indiana — Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
(in millions)	2019	2018	2019	2018	2019	2018	2019	2018
Sales
Receivables sold	$ 429	$ 461	$ 1,004	$ 1,028	$ 676	$ 692	$ 1,410	$ 1,386
Loss recognized on sale	3	3	7	6	4	4	9	7
Cash flows
Cash proceeds from receivables sold	$ 448	$ 465	$ 1,045	$ 1,050	$ 680	$ 686	$ 1,438	$ 1,397
Collection fees received	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
Return received on retained interests	2	1	4	3	2	2	5	4

Cash flows from sales of receivables are reflected within Operating Activities on Duke Energy Ohio’s and Duke Energy Indiana’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REVENUE

14 . REVENUE

Duke Energy earns substantially all of its revenues through its reportable segments, Electric Utilities and Infrastructure, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure and Commercial Renewables.

Electric Utilities and Infrastructure

Electric Utilities and Infrastructure earns the majority of its revenues through retail and wholesale electric service through the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. Duke Energy generally provides retail and wholesale electric service customers with their full electric load requirements or with supplemental load requirements when the customer has other sources of electricity.

The majority of wholesale revenues are full requirements contracts where the customers purchase the substantial majority of their energy needs and do not have a fixed quantity of contractually required energy or capacity. As such, related forecasted revenues are considered optional purchases. Supplemental requirements contracts that include contracted blocks of energy and capacity at contractually fixed prices have the following estimated remaining performance obligations:

(in millions)	Remaining Performance Obligations — 2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	Thereafter	Total
Progress Energy	$ 63	$ 121	$ 87	$ 82	$ 39	$ 42	$ 434
Duke Energy Progress	4	9	9	9	9	9	49
Duke Energy Florida	59	112	78	73	30	33	385
Duke Energy Indiana	5	10	5	—	—	—	20

Revenues for block sales are recognized monthly as energy is delivered and stand-ready service is provided, consistent with invoiced amounts and unbilled estimates.

Gas Utilities and Infrastructure

Gas Utilities and Infrastructure earns its revenues through retail and wholesale natural gas service through the transportation, distribution and sale of natural gas. Duke Energy generally provides retail and wholesale natural gas service customers with all natural gas load requirements. Additionally, while natural gas can be stored, substantially all natural gas provided by Duke Energy is consumed by customers simultaneously with receipt of delivery.

Fixed capacity payments under long-term contracts for the Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment include minimum margin contracts and supply arrangements with municipalities and power generation facilities. Revenues for related sales are recognized monthly as natural gas is delivered and stand-ready service is provided, consistent with invoiced amounts and unbilled estimates. Estimated remaining performance obligations are as follows:

(in millions)	Remaining Performance Obligations — 2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	Thereafter	Total
Piedmont	$ 34	$ 69	$ 65	$ 64	$ 61	$ 432	$ 725

Commercial Renewables

Commercial Renewables earns the majority of its revenues through long-term PPAs and generally sells all of its wind and solar facility output, electricity and RECs to customers. The majority of these PPAs have historically been accounted for as leases. For PPAs that are not accounted for as leases, the delivery of electricity and the delivery of RECs are considered separate performance obligations.

Other

The remainder of Duke Energy’s operations is presented as Other, which does not include material revenues from contracts with customers.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REVENUE

Disaggregated Revenues

Disaggregated revenues are presented as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
(in millions)	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
By market or type of customer	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential	$ 2,304	$ 679	$ 1,243	$ 496	$ 747	$ 159	$ 225	$ —
General	1,584	531	750	339	411	105	197	—
Industrial	759	289	231	164	67	36	201	—
Wholesale	527	109	351	309	42	9	59	—
Other revenues	187	68	99	44	55	25	27	—
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers	$ 5,361	$ 1,676	$ 2,674	$ 1,352	$ 1,322	$ 334	$ 709	$ —
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential	$ 146	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 64	$ —	$ 82
Commercial	85	—	—	—	—	26	—	59
Industrial	29	—	—	—	—	3	—	24
Power Generation	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	13
Other revenues	22	—	—	—	—	2	—	19
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers	$ 282	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 95	$ —	$ 197
Commercial Renewables
Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 46	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Other
Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 6	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Total revenue from contracts with customers	$ 5,695	$ 1,676	$ 2,674	$ 1,352	$ 1,322	$ 429	$ 709	$ 197
Other revenue sources (a)	$ 178	$ 37	$ 70	$ 35	$ 31	$ 4	$ 5	$ 12
Total revenues	$ 5,873	$ 1,713	$ 2,744	$ 1,387	$ 1,353	$ 433	$ 714	$ 209

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REVENUE

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke		Duke
(in millions)	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy		Energy
By market or type of customer	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio		Indiana	Piedmont
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential	$ 2,185	$ 659	$ 1,099	$ 452	$ 648	$ 181		$ 245	$ —
General	1,481	501	678	300	377	110		188	—
Industrial	736	286	224	159	66	33		192	—
Wholesale	515	115	322	287	34	2		77	—
Other revenues	194	85	96	47	50	23		20	—
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers	$ 5,111	$ 1,646	$ 2,419	$ 1,245	$ 1,175	$ 349		$ 722	$ —
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential	$ 153	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 66		$ —	$ 87
Commercial	87	—	—	—	—	28		—	59
Industrial	31	—	—	—	—	3		—	28
Power Generation	—	—	—	—	—	—		—	14
Other revenues	23	—	—	—	—	6		—	17
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers	$ 294	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 103		$ —	$ 205
Commercial Renewables
Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 47	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —		$ —	$ —
Other
Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 15	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 10		$ —	$ —
Total revenue from contracts with customers	$ 5,467	$ 1,646	$ 2,419	$ 1,245	$ 1,175	$ 462		$ 722	$ 205
Other revenue sources (a)	$ 176	$ 26	$ 79	$ 46	$ 28	$ ( 3	)	$ 16	$ 10
Total revenues	$ 5,643	$ 1,672	$ 2,498	$ 1,291	$ 1,203	$ 459		$ 738	$ 215

(a) Other revenue sources include revenues from leases, derivatives and alternative revenue programs that are not considered revenues from contracts with customers. Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over or under collection of related revenues.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REVENUE

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
(in millions)	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
By market or type of customer	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential	$ 4,674	$ 1,439	$ 2,357	$ 1,032	$ 1,325	$ 348	$ 531	$ —
General	3,011	1,027	1,382	645	737	208	394	—
Industrial	1,470	555	453	325	128	69	391	—
Wholesale	1,068	228	704	624	80	23	113	—
Other revenues	359	146	271	169	102	41	44	—
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers	$ 10,582	$ 3,395	$ 5,167	$ 2,795	$ 2,372	$ 689	$ 1,473	$ —
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential	$ 560	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 176	$ —	$ 384
Commercial	291	—	—	—	—	75	—	216
Industrial	77	—	—	—	—	10	—	66
Power Generation	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	26
Other revenues	85	—	—	—	—	10	—	75
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers	$ 1,013	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 271	$ —	$ 767
Commercial Renewables
Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 88	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Other
Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 10	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Total Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 11,693	$ 3,395	$ 5,167	$ 2,795	$ 2,372	$ 960	$ 1,473	$ 767
Other revenue sources (a)	$ 343	$ 62	$ 149	$ 76	$ 67	$ 4	$ 9	$ 21
Total revenues	$ 12,036	$ 3,457	$ 5,316	$ 2,871	$ 2,439	$ 964	$ 1,482	$ 788

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REVENUE

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018	Duke		Duke	Duke	Duke	Duke
(in millions)	Duke	Energy	Progress	Energy	Energy	Energy	Energy
By market or type of customer	Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential	$ 4,535	$ 1,440	$ 2,211	$ 968	$ 1,243	$ 361	$ 523	$ —
General	2,856	973	1,309	599	710	206	366	—
Industrial	1,400	541	432	304	128	63	365	—
Wholesale	1,148	234	768	684	84	2	145	—
Other revenues	333	152	225	132	93	37	37	—
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers	$ 10,272	$ 3,340	$ 4,945	$ 2,687	$ 2,258	$ 669	$ 1,436	$ —
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential	$ 566	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 177	$ —	$ 389
Commercial	288	—	—	—	—	77	—	211
Industrial	79	—	—	—	—	10	—	69
Power Generation	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	27
Other revenues	78	—	—	—	—	12	—	66
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers	$ 1,011	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 276	$ —	$ 762
Commercial Renewables
Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 80	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —
Other
Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 31	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ —	$ 24	$ —	$ —
Total Revenue from contracts with customers	$ 11,394	$ 3,340	$ 4,945	$ 2,687	$ 2,258	$ 969	$ 1,436	$ 762
Other revenue sources (a)	$ 384	$ 95	$ 129	$ 64	$ 60	$ 14	$ 33	$ 6
Total revenues	$ 11,778	$ 3,435	$ 5,074	$ 2,751	$ 2,318	$ 983	$ 1,469	$ 768

UNBILLED REVENUE

Unbilled revenues are recognized by applying customer billing rates to the estimated volumes of energy or natural gas delivered but not yet billed. Unbilled revenues can vary significantly from period to period as a result of seasonality, weather, customer usage patterns, customer mix, average price in effect for customer classes, timing of rendering customer bills and meter reading schedules, and the impact of weather normalization or margin decoupling mechanisms.

Unbilled revenues are included within Receivables and Receivables of VIEs on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as shown in the following table.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018
Duke Energy	$ 790	$ 896
Duke Energy Carolinas	288	313
Progress Energy	270	244
Duke Energy Progress	148	148
Duke Energy Florida	122	96
Duke Energy Ohio	1	2
Duke Energy Indiana	14	23
Piedmont	4	73

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REVENUE

Additionally, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana sell, on a revolving basis, nearly all of their retail accounts receivable, including receivables for unbilled revenues, to an affiliate, CRC, and account for the transfers of receivables as sales. Accordingly, the receivables sold are not reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. See Note 13 for further information. These receivables for unbilled revenues are shown in the table below.

(in millions)	June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018
Duke Energy Ohio	$ 65	$ 86
Duke Energy Indiana	116	128

15 . STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders, as adjusted for distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders, as adjusted for distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities, by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other agreements to issue common stock, such as stock options and equity forward sale agreements, were exercised or settled. Duke Energy’s participating securities are restricted stock units that are entitled to dividends declared on Duke Energy common stock during the restricted stock unit’s vesting periods.

The following table presents Duke Energy’s basic and diluted EPS calculations, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common and preferred share dividends declared.

(in millions, except per-share amounts)	Three Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018
Income from continuing operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders excluding impact of participating securities	$ 819	$ 504	$ 1,718	$ 1,123
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic	728	703	728	702
Equity Forwards	—	1	—	—
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted	728	704	728	702
EPS from continuing operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders
Basic and Diluted	$ 1.12	$ 0.72	$ 2.36	$ 1.60
Potentially dilutive items excluded from the calculation (a)	2	2	2	2
Dividends declared per common share	$ 0.928	$ 0.89	$ 1.855	$ 1.78
Dividends declared on preferred stock per depositary share	$ 0.307	$ —	$ 0.307	$ —

(a) Performance stock awards were not included in the dilutive securities calculation because the performance measures related to the awards had not been met.

Common Stock

On February 20, 2018, Duke Energy filed a prospectus supplement and executed an EDA under which it may sell up to $ 1 billion of its common stock through an ATM offering program, including an equity forward sales component. The EDA was entered into with the Agents. Under the terms of the EDA, Duke Energy may issue and sell, through any of the Agents, shares of common stock through September 23, 2019.

In June 2018, Duke Energy marketed two separate tranches, each for 1.3 million shares, of common stock through equity forward transactions under the ATM program. In December 2018, Duke Energy physically settled these equity forwards by delivering 2.6 million shares of common stock in exchange for net proceeds of approximately $ 195 million .

Separately, in March 2018, Duke Energy marketed an equity offering of 21.3 million shares of common stock through an Underwriting Agreement. In connection with the offering, Duke Energy entered into equity forward sale agreements. The equity forwards required Duke Energy to either physically settle the transactions by issuing 21.3 million shares in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreements, or net settle in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. In June 2018, Duke Energy physically settled one-half of the equity forwards by delivering approximately 10.6 million shares of common stock in exchange for net cash proceeds of approximately $ 781 million . In December 2018, Duke Energy physically settled the remaining equity forward by delivering 10.6 million shares of common stock in exchange for net cash proceeds of approximately $ 766 million .

In 2018, Duke Energy also issued 2.2 million shares through its DRIP with an increase in additional paid-in capital of approximately $ 174 million . For the six months ended June 30, 2019 , Duke Energy issued 0.9 million shares through its DRIP with an increase in additional paid-in capital of approximately $ 80 million .

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

In March and April 2019, Duke Energy marketed two separate tranches, each for 1.1 million shares, of common stock through equity forward transactions under the ATM program. The first tranche had an initial forward price of $ 89.83 per share and the second tranche had an initial forward price of $ 88.82 per share. In May and June 2019, a third tranche of 1.6 million shares of common stock was marketed and had an initial forward price of $ 86.23 . The equity forwards require Duke Energy to either physically settle the transaction by issuing shares in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreements or net settle in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. The settlement alternative is at Duke Energy's election. No amounts have or will be recorded in Duke Energy's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements with respect to these ATM offerings until settlements of the equity forwards occur, which is expected by December 31, 2019. The initial forward sale price will be subject to adjustment based on a floating interest rate factor and other fixed amounts specified in the relevant forward sale agreements. Until settlement of the equity forwards, EPS dilution resulting from the agreements, if any, will be determined under the treasury stock method.

Preferred Stock

On March 29, 2019, Duke Energy completed the issuance of 40 million depositary shares, each representing 1/1,000th share of its Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, at a price of $ 25 per depositary share. The transaction resulted in net proceeds of $ 973 million after issuance costs and the proceeds are being used for general corporate purposes and to reduce short-term debt. The preferred stock has a $ 25 liquidation preference per depositary share and earns dividends on a cumulative basis at a rate of 5.75 percent per annum. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on the 16th day of March, June, September and December, and began on June 16, 2019. Dividends issued on its preferred stock are subject to approval by the Duke Energy Board of Directors. However, the deferral of dividend payments on the preferred stock prohibits the declaration of common stock dividends. Dividends declared on preferred stock will be recorded on the income statement as a reduction of net income to arrive at net income attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders. Dividends accumulated on preferred stock will be a reduction to net income used in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.

The Series A Preferred Stock ranks, with respect to dividends and distributions upon liquidation or dissolution:

• senior to Common Stock and to each other class or series of capital stock established after the original issue date of the Series A Preferred Stock that is expressly made subordinated to the Series A Preferred Stock;

• on a parity with any class or series of capital stock established after the original issue date of the Series A Preferred Stock that is not expressly made senior or subordinated to the Series A Preferred Stock;

• junior to any class or series of capital stock established after the original issue date of the Series A Preferred Stock that is expressly made senior to the Series A Preferred Stock;

• junior to all of existing and future indebtedness (including indebtedness outstanding under Duke Energy's credit facilities, unsecured senior notes, junior subordinated debentures and commercial paper) and other liabilities with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against Duke Energy; and

• structurally subordinated to existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of Duke Energy's subsidiaries and future preferred stock of subsidiaries.

The preferred stock has no maturity or mandatory redemption date, is not redeemable at the option of the holders and includes separate call options. The first call option allows Duke Energy to call the preferred stock at a redemption price of $ 25.50 per depositary share prior to June 15, 2024, in whole but not in part, at any time within 120 days after a ratings event where a rating agency amends, clarifies or changes the criteria it uses to assign equity credit for securities such as the preferred stock. The second call option allows Duke Energy to call the preferred stock, in whole or in part, at any time, on or after June 15, 2024, at a redemption price of $ 25 per depositary share. Duke Energy is also required to redeem all accumulated and unpaid dividends if either call option is exercised.

Holders of the preferred stock have no voting rights with respect to matters that generally require the approval of voting stockholders. The limited voting rights of holders of preferred stock include the right to vote as a single class on certain matters that may affect the preference or special rights of the preferred stock, except in the instance that Duke Energy elects to defer the payment of dividends for a total of six quarterly full dividend periods. If dividends are deferred for a cumulative total of six quarterly full dividend periods, whether or not for consecutive dividend periods, holders of the preferred stock have the right to elect two additional Board members to the Duke Energy Board of Directors.

16 . EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLANS

Duke Energy and certain subsidiaries maintain, and the Subsidiary Registrants participate in, qualified and non-qualified, non-contributory defined benefit retirement plans. Duke Energy's policy is to fund amounts on an actuarial basis to provide assets sufficient to meet benefit payments to be paid to plan participants.

Duke Energy uses a December 31 measurement date for its qualified non-contributory defined benefit retirement plan assets and obligations. However, because Duke Energy believes it is probable in 2019 that total lump-sum benefit payments will exceed the settlement threshold, which is defined as the sum of the service cost and interest cost on projected benefit obligation components of net periodic pension costs, Duke Energy remeasured the plan assets and plan obligations associated with one of its qualified pension plans as of June 30, 2019. The discount rate used for the remeasurement was 3.5 percent . The cash balance interest crediting rate was 4.0 percent . All other assumptions used for the remeasurement were consistent with the measurement as of December 31, 2018. As a result, Duke Energy recognized a remeasurement gain of $ 18 million , which is recorded in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019. The remeasurement gain, which represents an increase in funded status, reflects an increase of $ 275 million in the fair value of plan assets and an increase of $ 257 million in the projected benefit obligation.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

As the result of settlement accounting, Duke Energy recognized a settlement charge of $ 69 million , primarily as a regulatory asset within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019 (an immaterial amount was recorded in Other income and expenses, net within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations). Settlement charges recognized by the Subsidiary Registrants were $ 43 million for Duke Energy Carolinas, $ 16 million for Duke Energy Progress, $ 3 million for Duke Energy Florida, $ 3 million for Duke Energy Indiana, $ 1 million for Duke Energy Ohio and $ 3 million for Piedmont. The settlement charge reflects the recognition of a pro - rata portion of previously unrecognized actuarial losses, equal to the percentage of reduction in the projected benefit obligation resulting from total lump-sum benefits payments as of June 30, 2019.

QUALIFIED PENSION PLANS

The following tables include the components of net periodic pension costs for qualified pension plans.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Ohio		Indiana		Piedmont
Service cost	$ 37		$ 12		$ 10		$ 6		$ 6		$ 1		$ 2		$ 2
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	82		21		26		12		13		4		7		3
Expected return on plan assets	( 143	)	( 37	)	( 45	)	( 21	)	( 22	)	( 6	)	( 10	)	( 6	)
Amortization of actuarial loss	25		5		9		3		6		—		1		1
Amortization of prior service credit	( 8	)	( 2	)	—		( 1	)	( 1	)	—		( 1	)	( 2	)
Net periodic pension costs	$ ( 7	)	$ ( 1	)	$ —		$ ( 1	)	$ 2		$ ( 1	)	$ ( 1	)	$ ( 2	)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Ohio		Indiana		Piedmont
Service cost	$ 45		$ 15		$ 13		$ 8		$ 6		$ 1		$ 3		$ 2
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	75		18		22		10		12		4		6		3
Expected return on plan assets	( 140	)	( 37	)	( 43	)	( 21	)	( 23	)	( 7	)	( 11	)	( 6	)
Amortization of actuarial loss	33		7		11		5		6		1		2		3
Amortization of prior service credit	( 8	)	( 2	)	( 1	)	( 1	)	( 1	)	—		—		( 3	)
Net periodic pension costs	$ 5		$ 1		$ 2		$ 1		$ —		$ ( 1	)	$ —		$ ( 1	)

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Ohio		Indiana		Piedmont
Service cost	$ 74		$ 24		$ 21		$ 12		$ 10		$ 2		$ 4		$ 3
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	165		41		52		24		27		9		13		6
Expected return on plan assets	( 286	)	( 75	)	( 89	)	( 44	)	( 44	)	( 14	)	( 21	)	( 11	)
Amortization of actuarial loss	49		11		18		6		12		1		3		3
Amortization of prior service credit	( 16	)	( 4	)	( 1	)	( 1	)	( 1	)	—		( 1	)	( 5	)
Net periodic pension costs	$ ( 14	)	$ ( 3	)	$ 1		$ ( 3	)	$ 4		$ ( 2	)	$ ( 2	)	$ ( 4	)

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
			Duke				Duke		Duke		Duke		Duke
	Duke		Energy		Progress		Energy		Energy		Energy		Energy
(in millions)	Energy		Carolinas		Energy		Progress		Florida		Ohio		Indiana		Piedmont
Service cost	$ 90		$ 30		$ 26		$ 15		$ 11		$ 2		$ 5		$ 4
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	150		36		46		21		25		9		12		6
Expected return on plan assets	( 280	)	( 74	)	( 88	)	( 42	)	( 46	)	( 14	)	( 21	)	( 12	)
Amortization of actuarial loss	66		14		22		10		12		2		4		6
Amortization of prior service credit	( 16	)	( 4	)	( 2	)	( 1	)	( 1	)	—		—		( 6	)
Net periodic pension costs	$ 10		$ 2		$ 4		$ 3		$ 1		$ ( 1	)	$ —		$ ( 2	)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

NON-QUALIFIED PENSION PLANS

Net periodic pension costs for non-qualified pension plans were not material for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, and 2018.

OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

Net periodic costs for OPEB plans were not material for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, and 2018.

17 . INCOME TAXES

EFFECTIVE TAX RATES

The ETRs from continuing operations for each of the Duke Energy Registrants are included in the following table.

	Three Months Ended — June 30,		Six Months Ended — June 30,
	2019	2018	2019	2018
Duke Energy	15.9 %	16.5 %	12.6 %	19.9 %
Duke Energy Carolinas	19.7 %	21.5 %	18.7 %	21.8 %
Progress Energy	16.7 %	17.3 %	17.0 %	15.4 %
Duke Energy Progress	16.3 %	20.1 %	17.1 %	16.8 %
Duke Energy Florida	19.6 %	18.0 %	19.5 %	17.4 %
Duke Energy Ohio	16.1 %	25.8 %	16.5 %	16.0 %
Duke Energy Indiana	24.2 %	25.8 %	24.2 %	25.8 %
Piedmont	22.2 %	27.3 %	21.8 %	23.9 %

The decrease in the ETR for Duke Energy for the six months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to a one-time valuation allowance charge in the prior year, an adjustment related to the income tax recognition for equity method investments recorded in the first quarter of 2019 and an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes. The equity method investment adjustment was immaterial and relates to prior years.

The decrease in the ETR for Duke Energy Carolinas for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.

The increase in the ETR for Progress Energy for the six months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to a decrease in AFUDC equity in the current year.

The decrease in the ETR for Duke Energy Progress for the three months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.

The increase in the ETR for Duke Energy Florida for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to a decrease in AFUDC equity in the current year.

The decrease in the ETR for Duke Energy Ohio for the three months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.

The decrease in the ETR for Duke Energy Indiana for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.

The decrease in the ETR for Piedmont for the three months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to lower state tax rates. The decrease in the ETR for the six months ended June 30, 2019, is primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.

18 . SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

For information on subsequent events related to the Commercial Renewables segment, regulatory matters, commitments and contingencies and debt, see Notes 2, 3, 4 and 6, respectively.

MD&A DUKE ENERGY

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following combined Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is separately filed by Duke Energy and Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont. However, none of the registrants make any representation as to information related solely to Duke Energy or the Subsidiary Registrants of Duke Energy other than itself.

DUKE ENERGY

Duke Energy is an energy company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. Duke Energy operates in the U.S. primarily through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont. When discussing Duke Energy’s consolidated financial information, it necessarily includes the results of the Subsidiary Registrants, which, along with Duke Energy, are collectively referred to as the Duke Energy Registrants.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and with Duke Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 .

Executive Overview

Regulatory Activity

In 2019, Duke Energy advanced regulatory activity underway in multiple jurisdictions as follows:

• New base rates were implemented in the Duke Energy Ohio Electric Base Rate Case on January 2, 2019.

• On January 11, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a request with the PSCSC, which included a request for the continuation of prior deferrals requested for ice storms and hurricanes Florence, Michael and Matthew. The request was approved on January 30, 2019.

• On January 30, 2019, Duke Energy Kentucky entered into a settlement agreement with the Attorney General of Kentucky related to the Natural Gas Base Rate Case. The settlement provides for an approximate $7 million increase in natural gas base revenue and approval of the proposed WNA mechanism. The KPSC issued its Order approving the settlement without material modification on March 27, 2019.

• On April 1, 2019, Piedmont filed an application with the NCUC, its first general rate case in North Carolina in six years. Piedmont expects new rates arising from this proceeding to take effect by the end of 2019.

• On May 21, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress received orders from the PSCSC and revised customer rates became effective June 1, 2019. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed Petitions for Rehearing or Reconsideration regarding certain coal ash costs and return on equity, among other items, and await the orders on reconsideration detailing the commission's decision. Once the orders are received, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have 30 days to file a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court.

• On June 11, 2019, the FPSC approved the petition to recover incremental storm restoration costs for Hurricane Michael and to apply tax savings resulting from the Tax Act toward storm costs in lieu of implementing a storm surcharge. On June 13, 2019, the FPSC issued its order approving the settlement agreement for storm cost recovery related to hurricanes Irma and Nate. Storm costs are currently expected to be fully recovered by approximately year-end 2021.

• On July 2, 2019, Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC, its first general rate case in Indiana in 16 years. Hearings are expected to commence in late 2019 or early 2020, with rates to be effective in mid-2020.

See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" for additional information.

Results of Operations

Non-GAAP Measures

Management’s Discussion and Analysis includes financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP in the U.S., as well as certain non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted earnings and adjusted EPS discussed below. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP measures presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies because other companies may not calculate the measures in the same manner.

Management evaluates financial performance in part based on non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS. Adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS represent income from continuing operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders in dollar and per-share amounts, adjusted for the dollar and per-share impact of special items. As discussed below, special items represent certain charges and credits, which management believes are not indicative of Duke Energy's ongoing performance. The most directly comparable GAAP measures for adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS are GAAP Reported Earnings and GAAP Reported EPS, respectively.

Special items in the 2018 periods presented below include the following items:

• Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger represents charges that resulted from the Piedmont acquisition.

100

MD&A DUKE ENERGY

• Regulatory and Legislative Impacts represents charges related to rate case orders, settlements or other actions of regulators or legislative bodies.

• Sale of Retired Plant represents the loss associated with selling Beckjord, a nonregulated generating facility in Ohio.

• Impairment of Equity Method Investment represents an OTTI of an investment in Constitution.

• Impacts of the Tax Act represents an AMT valuation allowance recognized related to the Tax Act.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

GAAP Reported EPS was $1.12 for the second quarter of 2019 compared to $0.71 for the second quarter of 2018 . The increase in GAAP Reported EPS was primarily due to positive rate case impacts, lower operating expenses and the allocation of losses to noncontrolling tax equity members resulting from the North Rosamond solar farm commencing commercial operations, as well as prior year regulatory and legislative impacts.

The following table reconciles non-GAAP measures, including adjusted diluted EPS, to their most directly comparable GAAP measures.

	Three Months Ended June 30, — 2019		2018
(in millions, except per-share amounts)	Earnings	EPS	Earnings	EPS
GAAP Reported Earnings/GAAP Reported EPS	$ 820	$ 1.12	$ 500	$ 0.71
Adjustments:
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (a)	—	—	15	0.02
Regulatory and Legislative Impacts (b)	—	—	136	0.19
Discontinued Operations	—	—	5	0.01
Adjusted Earnings/Adjusted Diluted EPS	$ 820	$ 1.12	$ 656	$ 0.93

(a) Net of $5 million tax benefit.

(b) Net of $43 million tax benefit.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

GAAP Reported EPS was $2.36 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , compared to $1.59 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 . The increase in GAAP Reported EPS was primarily due to positive rate case impacts, the allocation of losses to noncontrolling tax equity members resulting from the North Rosamond solar farm commencing commercial operations, and an adjustment related to income tax recognition for equity method investments, as well as prior year regulatory and legislative impacts, impairments charges, an AMT valuation allowance and a loss on sale of a retired plant. This was partially offset by higher depreciation and share dilution from equity issuances.

The following table reconciles non-GAAP measures, including adjusted diluted EPS, to their most directly comparable GAAP measures.

	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019		2018
(in millions, except per-share amounts)	Earnings	EPS	Earnings	EPS
GAAP Reported Earnings/GAAP Reported EPS	$ 1,720	$ 2.36	$ 1,120	$ 1.59
Adjustments:
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (a)	—	—	28	0.04
Regulatory and Legislative Impacts (b)	—	—	202	0.29
Sale of Retired Plant (c)	—	—	82	0.12
Impairment of Equity Method Investment (d)	—	—	42	0.06
Impacts of the Tax Act (AMT valuation allowance)	—	—	76	0.11
Discontinued Operations	—	—	5	0.01
Adjusted Earnings/Adjusted Diluted EPS	$ 1,720	$ 2.36	$ 1,555	$ 2.22

(a) Net of $9 million tax benefit.

(b) Net of $63 million tax benefit.

(d) Net of $13 million tax benefit.

SEGMENT RESULTS

The remaining information presented in this discussion of results of operations is on a GAAP basis. Management evaluates segment performance based on segment income. Segment income is defined as income from continuing operations net of income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Segment income includes intercompany revenues and expenses that are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Duke Energy's segment structure includes the following segments: Electric Utilities and Infrastructure, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure and Commercial Renewables. The remainder of Duke Energy’s operations is presented as Other. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments,” for additional information on Duke Energy’s segment structure.

101

MD&A SEGMENT RESULTS - ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Electric Utilities and Infrastructure

(in millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018	Variance		Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018	Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 5,475	$ 5,223	$ 252		$ 10,804	$ 10,546	$ 258
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	1,662	1,582	80		3,292	3,267	25
Operation, maintenance and other	1,318	1,395	(77	)	2,600	2,720	(120	)
Depreciation and amortization	951	838	113		1,898	1,673	225
Property and other taxes	297	279	18		598	553	45
Impairment charges	4	172	(168	)	4	215	(211	)
Total operating expenses	4,232	4,266	(34	)	8,392	8,428	(36	)
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	3	—	3		—	1	(1	)
Operating Income	1,246	957	289		2,412	2,119	293
Other Income and Expenses, net	89	91	(2	)	180	179	1
Interest Expense	330	316	14		668	633	35
Income Before Income Taxes	1,005	732	273		1,924	1,665	259
Income Tax Expense	196	157	39		365	340	25
Segment Income	$ 809	$ 575	$ 234		$ 1,559	$ 1,325	$ 234
Duke Energy Carolinas GWh sales	21,604	22,272	(668	)	43,432	44,899	(1,467	)
Duke Energy Progress GWh sales	16,222	15,896	326		32,570	33,122	(552	)
Duke Energy Florida GWh sales	11,151	10,304	847		19,472	19,423	49
Duke Energy Ohio GWh sales	5,660	6,147	(487	)	11,824	12,219	(395	)
Duke Energy Indiana GWh sales	7,437	8,301	(864	)	15,470	16,786	(1,316	)
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure GWh sales	62,074	62,920	(846	)	122,768	126,449	(3,681	)
Net proportional MW capacity in operation					49,725	49,297	428

Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’s results were impacted by a positive contribution from the 2018 Duke Energy Carolinas North Carolina rate case, Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments due to the Citrus County CC being placed in service, favorable weather-normal retail sales volumes and lower operation, maintenance and other expense.

These drivers were offset by unfavorable weather in the current year, higher depreciation from a growing asset base, higher interest expense and higher income tax expense. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $155 million increase in retail pricing primarily due to the prior year Duke Energy Carolinas North Carolina rate case and Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service;

• a $66 million increase in fuel related revenues; and

• a $19 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $168 million decrease in impairment charges primarily due to the impacts associated with the prior year Duke Energy Carolinas North Carolina rate case; and

• a $77 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to lower payroll and benefit costs resulting from prior year workforce reductions.

Partially offset by:

• a $113 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs, additional plant in service and new depreciation rates associated with the prior year Duke Energy Carolinas North Carolina rate case and Duke Energy Florida's Citrus County CC being placed in service;

• an $80 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to an increase in the North Carolina Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard requirement from the prior year at Duke Energy Progress; and

• an $18 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to higher property taxes for additional plant in service at Duke Energy Florida.

102

MD&A SEGMENT RESULTS - ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Interest Expense. The variance was driven primarily by higher debt outstanding in the current year and AFUDC debt return ending in the fourth quarter of 2018 on the Citrus County CC at Duke Energy Florida.

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income partially offset by an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes. The ETRs for the three months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 19.5 percent and 21.4 percent , respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes partially offset by a decrease in AFUDC equity in the current year.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’s results were impacted by a positive contribution from the 2018 Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate cases, Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments due to the Citrus County CC being placed in service and lower operation, maintenance and other expense.

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $330 million increase in retail pricing primarily due to the prior year Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate cases and Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service; and

• a $34 million increase in fuel related revenues.

Partially offset by:

• a $76 million decrease in retail sales, net of fuel revenues, due to unfavorable weather in the current year; and

• a $35 million decrease in rider revenues primarily due to excess deferred taxes and energy efficiency programs, partially offset by a decrement rider relating to nuclear decommissioning that ended in the prior year at Duke Energy Carolinas.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $211 million decrease in impairment charges primarily due to the impacts associated with the prior year Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate cases; and

• a $120 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to lower payroll and benefit costs resulting from prior year workforce reductions.

Partially offset by:

• a $225 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs, additional plant in service and new depreciation rates associated with the prior year Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate cases and Duke Energy Florida's Citrus County CC being placed in service;

• a $45 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to higher property taxes for additional plant in service at Duke Energy Florida and a favorable sales and use tax credit in the prior year at Duke Energy Progress; and

• a $25 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to an increase in the North Carolina Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard requirement from the prior year at Duke Energy Progress.

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income partially offset by an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes. The ETRs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 19.0 percent and 20.4 percent , respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes partially offset by a decrease in AFUDC equity in the current year.

Matters Impacting Future Electric Utilities and Infrastructure Results

On May 21, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress received orders from the PSCSC granting the companies’ requests for retail rate increases but denying recovery of certain coal ash costs. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed Petitions for Rehearing or Reconsideration and await the order on reconsideration detailing the commission's decision. Once the orders are received, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have 30 days to file a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if coal ash costs are not ultimately approved for recovery. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

103

MD&A SEGMENT RESULTS - ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

On May 18, 2016, the NCDEQ issued proposed risk classifications for all coal ash surface impoundments in North Carolina. All ash impoundments not previously designated as high priority by the Coal Ash Act were designated as intermediate risk. Certain impoundments classified as intermediate risk, however, were eligible for reassessment as low risk pursuant to legislation enacted on July 14, 2016. On November 14, 2018, NCDEQ issued final low-risk classifications for these impoundments, indicating that Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have satisfied the permanent replacement water supply and certain dam improvement requirements set out in the Coal Ash Management Act. On April 1, 2019, NCDEQ issued a closure determination requiring Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress to excavate all remaining coal ash impoundments in North Carolina, even though they had been deemed low risk. On April 26, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed a Petition for Contested Case Hearings in the Office of Administrative Hearings to challenge NCDEQ's April 1 Order. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek recovery of all costs through the ratemaking process consistent with previous proceedings. As the final closure plans and corrective action measures are developed and approved for each site, the closure work progresses and the closure method scope and remedial action methods are determined, the complexity of work and the amount of coal combustion material could be different than originally estimated and, therefore, could materially impact Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Commitments and Contingencies," for additional information.

Duke Energy is a party to multiple lawsuits and could be subject to fines and other penalties related to operations at certain North Carolina facilities with ash basins. In addition, the orders issued in the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate cases supporting recovery of past coal ash remediation costs have been appealed by various parties. The outcome of these appeals, lawsuits and potential fines and penalties could have an adverse impact on Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Notes 3 and 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively, for additional information.

On June 22, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas received an order from the NCUC, which denied the Grid Rider Stipulation and deferral treatment of grid improvement costs. Duke Energy Carolinas may petition for deferral of grid modernization costs outside of a general rate case proceeding if it can show financial hardship or a stipulation that includes greater consensus among intervening parties on costs being classified as grid modernization. While Duke Energy Progress did not request recovery of these costs in its most recent case with the NCUC, Duke Energy Progress may request recovery of certain grid modernization costs in future regulatory proceedings. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if grid modernization costs are not ultimately approved for recovery and/or deferral treatment.

During the last half of 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida’s service territories were impacted by several named storms. Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego caused flooding, extensive damage and widespread power outages to the service territories of Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress. Duke Energy Florida’s service territory was also impacted by Hurricane Michael, a Category 5 hurricane and the most powerful storm to hit the Florida Panhandle in recorded history. A significant portion of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms have been deferred. On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed with the NCUC petitions for approval to defer the incremental storm costs incurred to a regulatory asset for recovery in the next base rate case. On June 11, 2019, the FPSC approved Duke Energy Florida's petition for recovery of incremental storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Michael. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the deferral and future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC on July 2, 2019, its first general rate case in Indiana in 16 years. The outcome of this rate case could materially impact Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in the Duke Energy Registrants' Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.

104

MD&A SEGMENT RESULTS - GAS UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Gas Utilities and Infrastructure

(in millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018	Variance		Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018		Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 306	$ 318	$ (12	)	$ 1,062	$ 1,045		$ 17
Operating Expenses
Cost of natural gas	76	89	(13	)	403	402		1
Operation, maintenance and other	107	103	4		217	211		6
Depreciation and amortization	63	60	3		128	121		7
Property and other taxes	27	26	1		60	57		3
Total operating expenses	273	278	(5	)	808	791		17
Operating Income	33	40	(7	)	254	254		—
Other Income and Expenses, net	37	22	15		77	(13	)	90
Interest Expense	27	26	1		57	53		4
Income Before Income Taxes	43	36	7		274	188		86
Income Tax Expense	3	8	(5	)	8	44		(36	)
Segment Income	$ 40	$ 28	$ 12		$ 266	$ 144		$ 122
Piedmont LDC throughput (dekatherms)	104,684,733	116,839,962	(12,155,229	)	256,350,657	271,741,341		(15,390,684	)
Duke Energy Midwest LDC throughput (Mcf)	13,742,907	15,615,050	(1,872,143	)	52,281,179	52,741,115		(459,936	)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Gas Utilities and Infrastructure’s results were primarily impacted by higher equity earnings from ACP. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven by:

• an $11 million decrease at Piedmont primarily due to lower residential sales volumes due to unfavorable weather in the current year and a reduction of rates in South Carolina; and

• a $6 million decrease in the Midwest primarily due to lower natural gas costs passed through to customers and unfavorable weather in the current year.

Partially offset by:

• a $4 million increase primarily due to North Carolina and Tennessee IMR increases.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven by:

• a $13 million decrease in cost of natural gas primarily due to lower volumes sold at Piedmont and lower natural gas prices in the Midwest.

Partially offset by:

• a $4 million increase in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to higher employee benefit expenses and information technology outside services at Piedmont; and

• a $3 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to additional plant in service.

Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was driven by higher equity earnings from ACP in the current year.

Income Tax Expense. The decrease in tax expense was primarily due to current year AFUDC equity, partially offset by an increase in pretax income. The ETRs for the three months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 7.0 percent and 22.2 percent , respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily due to current year AFUDC equity.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Gas Utilities and Infrastructure’s results were primarily impacted by the prior year OTTI recorded on the Constitution investment and a 2019 adjustment related to the income tax recognition for equity method investments. The equity method investment adjustment was immaterial and relates to prior years. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven by:

• an $11 million increase primarily due to North Carolina and Tennessee IMR increases;

• a $9 million increase primarily due to higher natural gas prices associated with off-system sales; and

• an $8 million increase primarily due to NCUC approval related to tax reform accounting from fixed rate contracts.

105

MD&A SEGMENT RESULTS - GAS UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Partially offset by:

• a $6 million decrease primarily due to a reduction of rates in South Carolina;

• a $4 million decrease due to lower natural gas costs passed through to customers in the Midwest, due to lower natural gas prices; and

• a $2 million decrease due to unfavorable weather in the current year for the Midwest.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven by:

• a $7 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to additional plant in service;

• a $6 million increase in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to information technology outside services and higher gas operations labor costs;

• a $5 million increase in cost of natural gas at Piedmont primarily due to the impact of higher natural gas prices on off-system sales and unbilled revenue; and

• a $3 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to higher property tax expense related to additional plant in service.

Partially offset by:

• a $4 million decrease in cost of natural gas sold in the Midwest primarily due to lower natural gas prices.

Other Income and Expenses, net. The increase was primarily due to the prior year OTTI recorded on the Constitution investment and higher earnings from ACP in the current year.

Interest Expense. The variance was driven by higher debt outstanding in the current year and higher interest expense due to customers as a result of tax reform deferrals, partially offset by favorable AFUDC debt interest.

Income Tax Expense. The decrease in tax expense was primarily due to an adjustment related to the income tax recognition for equity method investments and current year AFUDC equity, partially offset by an increase in pretax income. The equity method investment adjustment was immaterial and relates to prior years. The ETRs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 2.9 percent and 23.4 percent, respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily due to an adjustment related to the income tax recognition for equity method investments that was recorded during the first quarter of 2019 and current year AFUDC equity. The equity method investment adjustment was immaterial and relates to prior years.

Matters Impacting Future Gas Utilities and Infrastructure Results

Gas Utilities and Infrastructure has a 47 percent ownership interest in ACP, which is building an approximately 600-mile interstate natural gas pipeline intended to transport diverse natural gas supplies into southeastern markets. Affected states (West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina) have issued certain necessary permits; the project remains subject to other pending federal and state approvals, which will allow full construction activities to begin. In 2018, FERC issued a series of Notices to Proceed, which authorized the project to begin certain construction-related activities along the pipeline route. Project cost estimates are a range of $7.0 billion to $7.8 billion, excluding financing costs. ACP expects to achieve a late 2020 in-service date for key segments of the project, while it expects the remainder to extend into 2021. Project construction activities, schedule and final costs are subject to uncertainty due to abnormal weather, work delays (including delays due to judicial or regulatory action) and other conditions and risks that could result in potential higher project costs, a potential delay in the targeted in-service dates, permanent or temporary suspension of AFUDC and potential impairment charges. ACP and Duke Energy will continue to consider their options with respect to the foregoing in light of their existing contractual and legal obligations. See Notes 3 and 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Variable Interest Entities," respectively, for additional information.

On November 13, 2013, the PUCO issued an order authorizing recovery of MGP costs at certain sites in Ohio with a deadline to complete the MGP environmental investigation and remediation work prior to December 31, 2016. This deadline was subsequently extended to December 31, 2019. Disallowance of costs incurred, failure to complete the work by the deadline or failure to obtain an extension from the PUCO could result in an adverse impact on Gas Utilities and Infrastructure’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information.

Piedmont filed a general rate case with the NCUC on April 1, 2019, its first general rate case in North Carolina in six years. The outcome of this rate case could materially impact Gas Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

106

MD&A SEGMENT RESULTS - COMMERCIAL RENEWABLES

Commercial Renewables

(in millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, — 2019		2018		Variance		Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019		2018		Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 118		$ 119		$ (1	)	$ 224		$ 220		$ 4
Operating Expenses
Operation, maintenance and other	64		69		(5	)	130		124		6
Depreciation and amortization	40		38		2		80		76		4
Property and other taxes	6		6		—		12		13		(1	)
Total operating expenses	110		113		(3	)	222		213		9
Operating Income	8		6		2		2		7		(5	)
Other Income and Expenses, net	(8	)	18		(26	)	(10	)	20		(30	)
Interest Expense	22		23		(1	)	43		45		(2	)
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes	(22	)	1		(23	)	(51	)	(18	)	(33	)
Income Tax Benefit	(24	)	(36	)	12		(59	)	(75	)	16
Less: Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests	(84	)	(1	)	(83	)	(91	)	(1	)	(90	)
Segment Income	$ 86		$ 38		$ 48		$ 99		$ 58		$ 41
Renewable plant production, GWh	2,314		2,471		(157	)	4,382		4,651		(269	)
Net proportional MW capacity in operation (a)							3,157		2,951		206

(a) Certain projects are included in tax equity structures where investors have differing interests in the project's economic attributes. One hundred percent of the tax equity project's capacity is included in the table above.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Commercial Renewables' results were favorably impacted by results from tax equity solar projects, partially offset by mark-to-market losses. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Other Income and Expenses, net. The decrease was primarily due to mark-to-market losses in the solar portfolio in the current year compared to mark-to-market gains and income from the North Allegheny Wind, LLC and FES settlement agreement in the prior year.

Income Tax Benefit. The decrease in the tax benefit was primarily driven by taxes associated with Duke Energy's interest in a tax equity solar project recorded in the second quarter of 2019 and a reduction in production tax credits generated.

Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. The increase was primarily due to the new tax equity solar projects entered into during 2019.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Commercial Renewables' results were favorably impacted by results from tax equity solar projects, partially offset by mark-to-market losses in the solar portfolio. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. The increase was primarily due to the new tax equity solar projects entered into during 2019.

Matters Impacting Future Commercial Renewables Results

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, Duke Energy evaluated recoverability of its renewable merchant plants principally in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas West market, due to declining market pricing and declining long-term forecasted energy and capacity prices, primarily driven by lower forecasted natural gas prices. These assets were not impaired; however, a continued decline in pricing would likely result in a future impairment. The carrying value of $160 million for one large wind project in West Texas approximates the aggregate estimated future cash flows from the asset. Impairment of these assets could result in adverse impacts to the future results of operations, financial position and cash flows of Commercial Renewables.

On April 24, 2019, Duke Energy executed an agreement to sell a minority interest in a portion of certain renewable assets. The portion of Duke Energy’s commercial renewables energy portfolio to be sold includes 49 percent of 37 operating wind, solar and battery storage assets and 33 percent of 11 operating solar assets across the U.S. Duke Energy Renewable Services, an operations and maintenance business for third-party customers, and REC Solar are not included in the potential transaction. The sale will result in pretax proceeds to Duke Energy of $415 million. Duke Energy will retain control of these assets, and, therefore, no gain or loss is expected to be recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations upon closing of the transaction. Duke Energy will also retain the majority of the remaining tax benefits from the projects. Duke Energy will continue to develop projects, grow its portfolio and manage its renewables assets. The sale is subject to customary closing conditions, including approvals from the FERC, the Public Utility Commission of Texas and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2019.

107

MD&A SEGMENT RESULTS - COMMERCIAL RENEWABLES

Other

(in millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, — 2019		2018		Variance		Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019		2018		Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 25		$ 32		$ (7	)	$ 46		$ 67		$ (21	)
Operating Expenses	11		59		(48	)	39		113		(74	)
Gains (Losses) on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	—		2		(2	)	—		(99	)	99
Operating Income (Loss)	14		(25	)	39		7		(145	)	152
Other Income and Expenses, net	30		27		3		74		41		33
Interest Expense	180		164		16		351		321		30
Loss Before Income Taxes	(136	)	(162	)	26		(270	)	(425	)	155
Income Tax Benefit	(33	)	(28	)	(5	)	(78	)	(27	)	(51	)
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests	—		2		(2	)	—		4		(4	)
Less: Preferred Dividends	12		—		12		12		—		12
Net Loss	$ (115	)	$ (136	)	$ 21		$ (204	)	$ (402	)	$ 198

Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

The variance was driven by the absence in the current year of costs related to the Piedmont acquisition and OVEC fuel expense, offset by higher interest expense . The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Operating Expenses. The decrease was primarily due to costs related to the Piedmont acquisition and OVEC fuel expense in the prior year.

Interest Expense. The variance was primarily due to higher short-term interest rates and higher outstanding debt in the current year.

Income Tax Benefit. The increase in the tax benefit was primarily driven by a prior year state rate change and tax levelization, partially offset by a decrease in pretax losses.

Preferred Dividends. The variance was driven by the declaration of the preferred stock dividend on preferred stock issued in 2019.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

The variance was driven by the prior year loss on sale of the retired Beckjord station and lower income taxes due to a 2018 adjustment to record a valuation allowance. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.

Operating Revenues. Lower operating revenues were due to amounts in the prior year related to Duke Energy Ohio’s entitlement of capacity and energy from OVEC’s power plants. In the current year, the revenues and expenses for OVEC are reflected in the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment due to the 2018 PUCO Order that approved Duke Energy to recover or credit amounts through Rider PSR. These amounts are deemed immaterial. Therefore, the prior period amounts were not restated.

Operating Expenses. The decrease was primarily due to costs associated with the Piedmont acquisition and OVEC fuel expense in the prior year.

Gains (Losses) on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net. The variance was driven by the prior year loss on sale of the retired Beckjord station, including the transfer of coal ash basins and other real property and indemnification from all potential future claims related to the property, whether arising under environmental laws or otherwise.

Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was primarily due to higher returns on investments that fund certain employee benefit obligations.

Interest Expense. The variance was primarily due to higher short-term interest rates and higher outstanding debt in the current year.

Income Tax Benefit. The increase in the tax benefit was primarily driven by a prior year valuation allowance against AMT credits partially offset by a decrease in pretax losses.

Preferred Dividends. The variance was driven by the declaration of the preferred stock dividend on preferred stock issued in 2019.

108

MD&A DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS

DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 .

Results of Operations

(in millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018		Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 3,457	$ 3,435		$ 22
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	867	880		(13	)
Operation, maintenance and other	881	950		(69	)
Depreciation and amortization	663	561		102
Property and other taxes	155	147		8
Impairment charges	5	190		(185	)
Total operating expenses	2,571	2,728		(157	)
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	—	(1	)	1
Operating Income	886	706		180
Other Income and Expenses, net	72	74		(2	)
Interest Expense	227	217		10
Income Before Income Taxes	731	563		168
Income Tax Expense	137	123		14
Net Income	$ 594	$ 440		$ 154

The following table shows the percent changes in GWh sales and average number of customers. The percentages for retail customer classes represent billed sales only. Total sales includes billed and unbilled retail sales and wholesale sales to incorporated municipalities, public and private utilities and power marketers. Amounts are not weather-normalized.

Increase (Decrease) over prior year	2019
Residential sales	(4.7	)%
General service sales	(1.0	)%
Industrial sales	(1.6	)%
Wholesale power sales	(15.7	)%
Joint dispatch sales	13.0	%
Total sales	(3.3	)%
Average number of customers	2.1	%

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $106 million increase in retail pricing due to the impacts of the prior year North Carolina rate case and the current year South Carolina rate case.

Partially offset by:

• a $44 million decrease in retail sales, net of fuel revenues, due to unfavorable weather in the current year; and

Operating Expenses . The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $185 million decrease in impairment charges primarily due to impacts of the prior year North Carolina rate order and charges related to coal ash costs in South Carolina; and

• a $69 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to decreased labor costs, partially offset by higher distribution maintenance costs and higher storm restoration costs.

Partially offset by:

• a $102 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to additional plant in service, new depreciation rates associated with the prior year North Carolina rate case and higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs associated with the prior year North Carolina rate case.

Interest Expense. The variance was primarily due to higher debt outstanding in the current year.

109

MD&A DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income partially offset by an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes. The ETRs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 18.7 percent and 21.8 percent , respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.

Matters Impacting Future Results

On May 21, 2019, the PSCSC issued an order granting Duke Energy Carolinas request for a retail rate increase but denying recovery of certain coal ash costs. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a Petition for Rehearing or Reconsideration and awaits the order on reconsideration detailing the commission's decision. Once the order is received, Duke Energy Carolinas has 30 days to file a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court. Duke Energy Carolinas' results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if coal ash costs are not ultimately approved for recovery. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

On May 18, 2016, the NCDEQ issued proposed risk classifications for all coal ash surface impoundments in North Carolina. All ash impoundments not previously designated as high priority by the Coal Ash Act were designated as intermediate risk. Certain impoundments classified as intermediate risk, however, were eligible for reassessment as low risk pursuant to legislation enacted on July 14, 2016. On November 14, 2018, NCDEQ issued final low-risk classifications for these impoundments, indicating that Duke Energy Carolinas had satisfied the permanent replacement water supply and certain dam improvement requirements set out in the Coal Ash Management Act. On April 1, 2019, NCDEQ issued a closure determination requiring Duke Energy Carolinas to excavate all remaining coal ash impoundments in North Carolina. On April 26, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a Petition for Contested Case Hearings in the Office of Administrative Hearings to challenge NCDEQ's April 1 Order. Duke Energy Carolinas intends to seek recovery of all costs through the ratemaking process consistent with previous proceedings. As the final closure plans and corrective action measures are developed and approved for each site, the closure work progresses, and the closure method scope and remedial action methods are determined, the complexity of work and the amount of coal combustion material could be different than originally estimated and, therefore, could materially impact Duke Energy Carolinas' results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Commitments and Contingencies," for additional information.

Duke Energy Carolinas is a party to multiple lawsuits and subject to fines and other penalties related to operations at certain North Carolina facilities with ash basins. In addition, the order issued in the Duke Energy Carolinas North Carolina rate case supporting recovery of past coal ash remediation costs has been appealed by various parties. The outcome of these appeals, lawsuits, fines and penalties could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Carolinas’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Notes 3 and 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively, for additional information.

On June 22, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas received an order from the NCUC, which denied the Grid Rider Stipulation and deferral treatment of grid improvement costs. Duke Energy Carolinas may petition for deferral of grid modernization costs outside of a general rate case proceeding if it can show financial hardship or a stipulation that includes greater consensus among intervening parties on costs being classified as grid modernization. Duke Energy Carolinas' results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if grid modernization costs are not ultimately approved for recovery and/or deferral treatment.

During the last half of 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas’ service territory was impacted by several named storms. Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego caused flooding, extensive damage and widespread power outages in the service territory. A significant portion of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms have been deferred. On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed with the NCUC a petition for approval to defer the incremental storm costs incurred to a regulatory asset for recovery in the next base rate case. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the deferral and future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Carolinas' results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

110

MD&A PROGRESS ENERGY

PROGRESS ENERGY

Results of Operations

(in millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019		2018	Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 5,316		$ 5,074	$ 242
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	1,913		1,871	42
Operation, maintenance and other	1,173		1,233	(60	)
Depreciation and amortization	881		764	117
Property and other taxes	280		254	26
Impairment charges	—		33	(33	)
Total operating expenses	4,247		4,155	92
(Losses) Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	(1	)	12	(13	)
Operating Income	1,068		931	137
Other Income and Expenses, net	65		77	(12	)
Interest Expense	438		412	26
Income Before Income Taxes	695		596	99
Income Tax Expense	118		92	26
Net Income	577		504	73
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests	—		4	(4	)
Net Income Attributable to Parent	$ 577		$ 500	$ 77

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $193 million increase in retail pricing primarily due to the impacts of the prior year Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate case, Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service and annual increases from the 2017 Settlement Agreement;

• a $54 million increase in fuel revenues primarily related to increased fuel cost recovery due to extreme weather in the prior year at Duke Energy Progress;

• a $17 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes at Duke Energy Florida;

• a $12 million increase in transmission revenues related to the Fixed Bill program at Duke Energy Florida; and

• an $11 million increase in rider revenues primarily related to energy efficiency programs at Duke Energy Progress.

Partially offset by:

• a $22 million decrease in fuel and capacity revenues primarily due to a decrease in fuel and capacity rates billed to retail customers at Duke Energy Florida;

• a $14 million decrease in retail rider revenues at Duke Energy Progress primarily related to decreased revenue requirements in the current year; and

• a $13 million decrease in retail sales, net of fuel revenues, due to unfavorable weather in the current year at Duke Energy Progress.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $117 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs, new depreciation rates associated with the prior year Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate case and Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service;

• a $42 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to an increase in the North Carolina Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard requirement from prior year at Duke Energy Progress, partially offset by lower purchased power at Duke Energy Florida; and

• a $26 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to higher property taxes for additional plant in service at Duke Energy Florida and a favorable sales and use tax credit in the prior year at Duke Energy Progress.

111

MD&A PROGRESS ENERGY

Partially offset by:

• a $60 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to prior year impacts associated with the Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate case and lower employee benefit expenses at Duke Energy Progress; and

• a $33 million decrease in impairment charges primarily due to prior year impacts associated with the Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate case.

Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was driven primarily by AFUDC equity return ending on the Citrus County CC in the fourth quarter of 2018 at Duke Energy Florida, partially offset by life insurance proceeds at Duke Energy Progress.

Interest Expense. The variance was driven primarily by AFUDC debt return ending in the fourth quarter of 2018 on the Citrus County CC at Duke Energy Florida.

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income and a decrease in AFUDC equity in the current year. The ETRs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 17.0 percent and 15.4 percent , respectively. The increase in the ETR was primarily due to a decrease in AFUDC equity in the current year.

Matters Impacting Future Results

On May 21, 2019, the PSCSC issued an order granting Duke Energy Progress' request for a retail rate increase but denying recovery of certain coal ash costs. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a Petition for Rehearing or Reconsideration and awaits the order on reconsideration detailing the commission's decision. Once the order is received, Duke Energy Progress has 30 days to file a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court. Progress Energy's results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if coal ash costs are not ultimately approved for recovery. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

On May 18, 2016, the NCDEQ issued proposed risk classifications for all coal ash surface impoundments in North Carolina. All ash impoundments not previously designated as high priority by the Coal Ash Act were designated as intermediate risk. Certain impoundments classified as intermediate risk, however, were eligible for reassessment as low risk pursuant to legislation enacted on July 14, 2016. On November 14, 2018, NCDEQ issued final low-risk classifications for these impoundments, indicating that Duke Energy Progress had satisfied the permanent replacement water supply and certain dam improvement requirements set out in the Coal Ash Management Act. On April 1, 2019, NCDEQ issued a closure determination requiring Duke Energy Progress to excavate all remaining coal ash impoundments in North Carolina. On April 26, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a Petition for Contested Case Hearings in the Office of Administrative Hearings to challenge NCDEQ's April 1 Order. Duke Energy Progress intends to seek recovery of all costs through the ratemaking process consistent with previous proceedings. As the final closure plans and corrective action measures are developed and approved for each site, the closure work progresses, and the closure method scope and remedial action methods are determined, the complexity of work and the amount of coal combustion material could be different than originally estimated and, therefore, could materially impact Progress Energy's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Commitments and Contingencies," for additional information.

Duke Energy Progress is a party to multiple lawsuits and subject to fines and other penalties related to operations at certain North Carolina facilities with ash basins. As noted above, the order issued in the Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate case supporting recovery of past coal ash remediation costs has been appealed by various parties. The outcome of these appeals, lawsuits, fines and penalties could have an adverse impact on Progress Energy’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Notes 3 and 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively, for additional information.

Duke Energy Carolinas received an order from the NCUC, which denied the Grid Rider Stipulation and deferral treatment of grid improvement costs. The NCUC did allow Duke Energy Carolinas to petition for deferral of grid modernization costs outside of a general rate case proceeding if it can show financial hardship or a stipulation that includes greater consensus among intervening parties on costs being classified as grid modernization. While Duke Energy Progress did not request recovery of these costs in its most recent case with the NCUC, Duke Energy Progress may request recovery of certain grid modernization costs in future regulatory proceedings. If the NCUC were to rule similarly, Progress Energy's results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if grid modernization costs are not ultimately approved for recovery and/or deferral treatment.

During the last half of 2018, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida’s service territories were impacted by several named storms. Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego caused flooding, extensive damage and widespread power outages to the service territory of Duke Energy Progress. Duke Energy Florida’s service territory was also impacted by Hurricane Michael, a Category 5 hurricane and the most powerful storm to hit the Florida Panhandle in recorded history. A significant portion of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms have been deferred. On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Progress filed with the NCUC a petition for approval to defer the incremental storm costs incurred to a regulatory asset for recovery in the next base rate case. On June 11, 2019, the FPSC approved Duke Energy Florida's petition for recovery of incremental storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Michael. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the deferral and future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Progress Energy's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

112

MD&A DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS

Results of Operations

(in millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018	Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 2,871	$ 2,751	$ 120
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	994	917	77
Operation, maintenance and other	692	756	(64	)
Depreciation and amortization	541	470	71
Property and other taxes	85	75	10
Impairment charges	—	33	(33	)
Total operating expenses	2,312	2,251	61
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	—	2	(2	)
Operating Income	559	502	57
Other Income and Expenses, net	48	37	11
Interest Expense	158	159	(1	)
Income Before Income Taxes	449	380	69
Income Tax Expense	77	64	13
Net Income	$ 372	$ 316	$ 56

Increase (Decrease) over prior period	2019
Residential sales	(7.6	)%
General service sales	(3.3	)%
Industrial sales	0.7	%
Wholesale power sales	(5.0	)%
Joint dispatch sales	20.8	%
Total sales	(1.7	)%
Average number of customers	1.3	%

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $68 million increase in retail pricing due to the impacts of the prior year North Carolina rate case and the current year South Carolina rate case;

• a $54 million increase in fuel revenues primarily related to increased fuel cost recovery due to extreme weather in the prior year; and

• an $11 million increase in rider revenues primarily related to energy efficiency programs.

Partially offset by:

• a $13 million decrease in retail sales, net of fuel revenues, due to unfavorable weather in the current year.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $77 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to a higher deferred fuel balance and an increase in the North Carolina Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard requirement from prior year, partially offset by lower demand and changes in generation mix;

• a $71 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs and new depreciation rates associated with the prior year North Carolina rate case, partially offset by the amortization credit for the North Carolina Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard requirement increase from prior year; and

• a $10 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to a favorable sales and use tax credit in the prior year.

Partially offset by:

• a $64 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to prior year impacts associated with the North Carolina rate case and lower employee benefit and outage costs; and

113

MD&A DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS

• a $33 million decrease in impairment charges due to prior year impacts associated with the North Carolina rate case.

Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was driven primarily by life insurance proceeds .

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income. The ETRs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 17.1 percent and 16.8 percent , respectively.

Matters Impacting Future Results

On May 21, 2019, the PSCSC issued an order granting Duke Energy Progress' request for a retail rate increase but denying recovery of certain coal ash costs. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a Petition for Rehearing or Reconsideration and awaits the order on reconsideration detailing the commission's decision. Once the order is received, Duke Energy Progress has 30 days to file a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court. Duke Energy Progress' results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if coal ash costs are not ultimately approved for recovery. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

On May 18, 2016, the NCDEQ issued proposed risk classifications for all coal ash surface impoundments in North Carolina. All ash impoundments not previously designated as high priority by the Coal Ash Act were designated as intermediate risk. Certain impoundments classified as intermediate risk, however, were eligible for reassessment as low risk pursuant to legislation enacted on July 14, 2016. On November 14, 2018, NCDEQ issued final low-risk classifications for these impoundments, indicating that Duke Energy Progress had satisfied the permanent replacement water supply and certain dam improvement requirements set out in the Coal Ash Management Act. On April 1, 2019, NCDEQ issued a closure determination requiring Duke Energy Progress to excavate all remaining coal ash impoundments in North Carolina. On April 26, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a Petition for Contested Case Hearings in the Office of Administrative Hearings to challenge NCDEQ's April 1 Order. Duke Energy Progress intends to seek recovery of all costs through the ratemaking process consistent with previous proceedings. As the final closure plans and corrective action measures are developed and approved for each site, the closure work progresses, and the closure method scope and remedial action methods are determined, the complexity of work and the amount of coal combustion material could be different than originally estimated and, therefore, could materially impact Duke Energy Progress' results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Commitments and Contingencies," for additional information.

Duke Energy Progress is a party to multiple lawsuits and subject to fines and other penalties related to operations at certain North Carolina facilities with ash basins. As noted above, the order issued in the Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate case supporting recovery of past coal ash remediation costs has been appealed by various parties. The outcome of these appeals, lawsuits, fines and penalties could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Progress’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Notes 3 and 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively, for additional information.

Duke Energy Carolinas received an order from the NCUC, which denied the Grid Rider Stipulation and deferral treatment of grid improvement costs. The NCUC did allow Duke Energy Carolinas to petition for deferral of grid modernization costs outside of a general rate case proceeding if it can show financial hardship or a stipulation that includes greater consensus among intervening parties on costs being classified as grid modernization. While Duke Energy Progress did not request recovery of these costs in its most recent case with the NCUC, Duke Energy Progress may request recovery of certain grid modernization costs in future regulatory proceedings. If the NCUC were to rule similarly, Duke Energy Progress' results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if grid modernization costs are not ultimately approved for recovery and/or deferral treatment.

During the last half of 2018, Duke Energy Progress' service territory was impacted by several named storms. Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego caused flooding, extensive damage and widespread power outages in the service territory. A significant portion of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms have been deferred. On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Progress filed with the NCUC a petition for approval to defer the incremental storm costs incurred to a regulatory asset for recovery in the next base rate case. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the deferral and future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Progress' results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

114

MD&A DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA

Results of Operations

(in millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019		2018	Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 2,439		$ 2,318	$ 121
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	919		953	(34	)
Operation, maintenance and other	474		474	—
Depreciation and amortization	340		294	46
Property and other taxes	196		179	17
Total operating expenses	1,929		1,900	29
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	(1	)	—	(1	)
Operating Income	509		418	91
Other Income and Expenses, net	25		47	(22	)
Interest Expense	165		137	28
Income Before Income Taxes	369		328	41
Income Tax Expense	72		57	15
Net Income	$ 297		$ 271	$ 26

The following table shows the percent changes in GWh sales and average number of customers. The percentages for retail customer classes represent billed sales only. Wholesale power sales include both billed and unbilled sales. Total sales includes billed and unbilled retail sales and wholesale sales to incorporated municipalities, public and private utilities and power marketers. Amounts are not weather-normalized.

Increase (Decrease) over prior period	2019
Residential sales	2.1	%
General service sales	1.2	%
Industrial sales	(6.0	)%
Wholesale and other	5.9	%
Total sales	0.3	%
Average number of customers	1.5	%

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $125 million increase in retail pricing due to base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service and annual increases from the 2017 Settlement Agreement;

• a $17 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes driven by residential growth; and

• a $12 million increase in other revenues primarily due to increased transmission revenues related to the Fixed Bill program which began later in 2018 and non-regulated products and services revenues.

Partially offset by:

• a $22 million decrease in fuel and capacity revenues primarily due to a decrease in fuel and capacity rates billed to retail customers; and

• a $14 million decrease in retail rider revenues primarily related to decreased revenue requirements in the current year.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $46 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service, other additional plant in service and increases resulting from the 2018 Crystal River Unit 3 nuclear decommissioning cost study; and

• a $17 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to higher property taxes from additional plant in service.

Partially offset by:

• a $34 million decrease in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to lower purchased power, partially offset by higher deferred fuel and capacity expenses.

115

MD&A DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA

Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was driven primarily by AFUDC equity return ending on the Citrus County CC in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Interest Expense. The variance was driven primarily by AFUDC debt return ending on the Citrus County CC in the fourth quarter of 2018 and higher debt outstanding in the current year.

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income and a decrease in AFUDC equity in the current year. The ETRs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 19.5 percent and 17.4 percent , respectively. The increase in the ETR was primarily due to a decrease in AFUDC equity in the current year.

Matters Impacting Future Results

On October 10, 2018, Hurricane Michael made landfall on Florida's Panhandle as a Category 5 hurricane, the most powerful storm to hit the Florida Panhandle in recorded history. The storm caused significant damage within the service territory of Duke Energy Florida, particularly from Panama City Beach to Mexico Beach. Duke Energy Florida has not completed the final accumulation of total estimated storm restoration costs incurred. On June 11, 2019, the FPSC approved Duke Energy Florida's petition for recovery of incremental storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Michael. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Florida's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information.

DUKE ENERGY OHIO

Results of Operations

(in millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018		Variance
Operating Revenues
Regulated electric	$ 691	$ 682		$ 9
Regulated natural gas	273	277		(4	)
Nonregulated electric and other	—	24		(24	)
Total operating revenues	964	983		(19	)
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power – regulated	179	185		(6	)
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power – nonregulated	—	29		(29	)
Cost of natural gas	64	69		(5	)
Operation, maintenance and other	255	261		(6	)
Depreciation and amortization	130	132		(2	)
Property and other taxes	158	145		13
Total operating expenses	786	821		(35	)
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net	—	(106	)	106
Operating Income	178	56		122
Other Income and Expenses, net	15	14		1
Interest Expense	54	45		9
Income Before Income Taxes	139	25		114
Income Tax Expense	23	4		19
Net Income	$ 116	$ 21		$ 95

The following table shows the percent changes in GWh sales of electricity, dekatherms of natural gas delivered and average number of electric and natural gas customers. The percentages for retail customer classes represent billed sales only. Total sales includes billed and unbilled retail sales and wholesale sales to incorporated municipalities, public and private utilities and power marketers. Amounts are not weather-normalized.

Increase (Decrease) over prior year	Electric — 2019		Natural Gas — 2019
Residential sales	(7.2	)%	(1.4	)%
General service sales	(3.5	)%	0.1	%
Industrial sales	(2.1	)%	(1.0	)%
Wholesale electric power sales	65.3	%	n/a
Other natural gas sales	n/a		(1.1	)%
Total sales	(3.2	)%	(0.9	)%
Average number of customers	0.6	%	0.8	%

116

MD&A DUKE ENERGY OHIO

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Operating Revenues . The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $25 million decrease in fuel related revenues primarily due to a decrease in sales volumes;

• a $16 million decrease in rider revenues primarily related to the implementation of new base rates;

• a $14 million decrease in retail sales, net of fuel revenues, due to unfavorable weather in the current year;

• a $12 million decrease in FTR rider revenues; and

• a $6 million decrease in OVEC revenues.

Partially offset by:

• a $38 million increase in retail pricing primarily due to rate case impacts; and

• a $12 million increase in point-to-point transmission revenues.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $35 million decrease in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power expense due to the prior year outage at East Bend Station and the deferral of OVEC related purchased power costs.

Partially offset by:

• a $13 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to a higher tax base.

Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was driven primarily by an increase in intercompany money pool interest income.

Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net. The increase was driven by the loss on the prior year sale of Beckjord.

Interest Expense. The variance was driven primarily by higher debt outstanding in the current year.

Income Tax Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income. The ETRs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 16.5 percent and 16.0 percent , respectively.

Matters Impacting Future Results

On November 13, 2013, the PUCO issued an order authorizing recovery of MGP costs at certain sites in Ohio with a deadline to complete the MGP environmental investigation and remediation work prior to December 31, 2016. This deadline was subsequently extended to December 31, 2019. Disallowance of costs incurred, failure to complete the work by the deadline or failure to obtain an extension from the PUCO could result in an adverse impact on Duke Energy Ohio’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information.

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA

Results of Operations

(in millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018	Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 1,482	$ 1,469	$ 13
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power	486	458	28
Operation, maintenance and other	377	378	(1	)
Depreciation and amortization	263	256	7
Property and other taxes	39	40	(1	)
Total operating expenses	1,165	1,132	33
Operating Income	317	337	(20	)
Other Income and Expenses, net	27	13	14
Interest Expense	71	83	(12	)
Income Before Income Taxes	273	267	6
Income Tax Expense	66	69	(3	)
Net Income	$ 207	$ 198	$ 9

117

MD&A DUKE ENERGY INDIANA

Increase (Decrease) over prior year	2019
Residential sales	(6.3	)%
General service sales	(1.7	)%
Industrial sales	(1.6	)%
Wholesale power sales	(33.1	)%
Total sales	(7.8	)%
Average number of customers	1.3	%

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $25 million increase in fuel revenues primarily due to higher fuel rates billed to customers, partially offset by lower wholesale fuel revenues due to the expiration of a contract with a wholesale customer.

Partially offset by:

• a $10 million decrease in retail sales, net of fuel revenues, due to unfavorable weather in the current year; and

• a $1 million decrease in weather-normal retail sales volumes.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $28 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power expense primarily due to higher amortization of deferred fuel costs and higher purchased power, partially offset by lower natural gas and coal costs; and

• a $7 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to the regulatory liability related to Edwardsport IGCC plant being fully amortized in the prior year.

Other Income and Expenses, net. The increase was primarily due to life insurance proceeds, a prior year deduction for customer refunds, legal fees and contributions related to the IGCC tax settlement and a prior year true up of executive deferred compensation.

Interest Expense . The variance was primarily due to recording a debt return on the cumulative balance of deferred coal ash spend based on probability of recovery. This adjustment was immaterial and primarily relates to prior years.

Income Tax Expense . The decrease in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes, partially offset by an increase in pretax income. The ETRs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , were 24.2 percent and 25.8 percent , respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily due to an increase in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.

Matters Impacting Future Results

On April 17, 2015, the EPA published in the Federal Register a rule to regulate the disposal of CCR from electric utilities as solid waste. Duke Energy Indiana has interpreted the rule to identify the coal ash basin sites impacted and has assessed the amounts of coal ash subject to the rule and a method of compliance. Duke Energy Indiana's interpretation of the requirements of the CCR rule is subject to potential legal challenges and further regulatory approvals, which could result in additional ash basin closure requirements, higher costs of compliance and greater AROs. Additionally, Duke Energy Indiana has retired facilities that are not subject to the CCR rule. Duke Energy Indiana may incur costs at these facilities to comply with environmental regulations or to mitigate risks associated with on-site storage of coal ash. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing recovery of costs related to closure of ash basins could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Indiana's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC on July 2, 2019, its first general rate case in Indiana in 16 years. The outcome of this rate case could materially impact Duke Energy Indiana's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

118

MD&A PIEDMONT

PIEDMONT

Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , and 2018 , and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 .

Results of Operations

(in millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, — 2019	2018	Variance
Operating Revenues	$ 788	$ 768	$ 20
Operating Expenses
Cost of natural gas	338	333	5
Operation, maintenance and other	163	167	(4	)
Depreciation and amortization	84	78	6
Property and other taxes	25	24	1
Total operating expenses	610	602	8
Operating Income	178	166	12
Other Income and Expenses, net	12	9	3
Interest Expense	43	41	2
Income Before Income Taxes	147	134	13
Income Tax Expense	32	32	—
Net Income	$ 115	$ 102	$ 13

The following table shows the percent changes in dekatherms delivered and average number of customers. The percentages for all throughput deliveries represent billed and unbilled sales. Amounts are not weather-normalized.

Increase (Decrease) over prior year	2019
Residential deliveries	(8.3	)%
Commercial deliveries	(5.1	)%
Industrial deliveries	2.0	%
Power generation deliveries	(7.9	)%
For resale	4.9	%
Total throughput deliveries	(5.7	)%
Secondary market volumes	7.1	%
Average number of customers	1.2	%

Due to the margin decoupling mechanism in North Carolina and the WNA in South Carolina and Tennessee, changes in throughput deliveries do not have a material impact on Piedmont's revenues or earnings. The margin decoupling mechanism adjusts for variations in residential and commercial use per customer, including those due to weather and conservation. The WNA mostly offsets the impact of weather on bills rendered, but do not ensure precise recovery of approved margin during periods when winter weather is significantly warmer or colder than normal.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 , as compared to June 30, 2018

Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:

• an $11 million increase primarily due to North Carolina and Tennessee IMR increases;

• a $9 million increase primarily due to higher natural gas prices associated with increased off-system sales; and

• an $8 million increase primarily due to NCUC approval related to tax reform accounting from fixed rate contracts.

Partially offset by:

• a $6 million decrease primarily due to a reduction of rates in South Carolina.

Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:

• a $6 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to additional plant in service; and

• a $5 million increase in cost of natural gas primarily due to the impact of higher natural gas prices on off-system sales and unbilled revenue.

Partially offset by:

• a $4 million decrease in operations, maintenance and other expense primarily due to lower labor costs and a portion of rent expense being charged to shared services in current year.

119

MD&A PIEDMONT

Matters Impacting Future Results

Piedmont filed a general rate case with the NCUC on April 1, 2019, its first general rate case in North Carolina in six years. The outcome of this rate case could materially impact Piedmont's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources and Uses of Cash

Duke Energy relies primarily upon cash flows from operations, debt and equity issuances and its existing cash and cash equivalents to fund its liquidity and capital requirements. Duke Energy’s capital requirements arise primarily from capital and investment expenditures, repaying long-term debt and paying dividends to shareholders. See Duke Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 , for a summary and detailed discussion of projected primary sources and uses of cash for 2019 to 2021 .

Duke Energy issued $3.8 billion of debt, drew $650 million under the Duke Energy Progress Term Loan Facility and paid off in full the $350 million Piedmont term loan during the six months ended June 30, 2019 . Refer to Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Debt and Credit Facilities," for information regarding Duke Energy's debt issuances, debt maturities and available credit facilities including the Master Credit Facility.

In March 2019, Duke Energy issued preferred stock for net proceeds of $973 million. In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 , Duke Energy raised approximately $80 million of common equity through its DRIP. Refer to Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Stockholders' Equity," for information regarding Duke Energy's equity issuances.

Credit Ratings

In May 2019, S&P revised the credit ratings outlook for Duke Energy Corporation and all other Duke Energy Registrants from stable to negative, principally due to concerns of weaker financial measures due to 2018 storms, uncertainty over coal ash remediation costs and recovery in the Carolinas, regulatory lag during a period of robust capital spending and delays related to the ACP pipeline. There have been no changes to the credit ratings of any of the Duke Energy Registrants during 2019 by any of the rating agencies. Moody's and Fitch continue to maintain a stable outlook on Duke Energy Corporation.

Cash Flow Information

The following table summarizes Duke Energy’s cash flows.

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$ 3,056		$ 3,302
Investing activities	(5,788	)	(4,645	)
Financing activities	2,622		1,265
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	(110	)	(78	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	591		505
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$ 481		$ 427

OPERATING CASH FLOWS

The following table summarizes key components of Duke Energy’s operating cash flows.

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		Variance
Net income	$ 1,641		$ 1,124		$ 517
Non-cash adjustments to net income	2,921		3,082		(161	)
Contributions to qualified pension plans	—		(141	)	141
Payments for asset retirement obligations	(336	)	(245	)	(91	)
Payment for disposal of other assets	—		(105	)	105
Working capital	(1,170	)	(413	)	(757	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$ 3,056		$ 3,302		$ (246	)

120

MD&A LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The variance was primarily due to:

• a $757 million increase in cash outflows from working capital primarily due to fluctuations in coal stock inventory, fluctuations of payables balances due primarily to storm costs and timing and increases in federal tax receivables, partially offset by fluctuations in accounts receivable balances due to higher receivables at December 31, 2018; and

• a $91 million increase in payments for asset retirement obligations.

Partially offset by:

• a $356 million increase in net income after adjustment for non-cash items due primarily to increases in revenues as a result of rate increases in the current year, partially offset by decreases in current year non-cash adjustments;

• a $141 million decrease in contributions to qualified pension plans; and

• a $105 million payment for disposal of Beckjord in the prior year.

INVESTING CASH FLOWS

The following table summarizes key components of Duke Energy’s investing cash flows.

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		Variance
Capital, investment and acquisition expenditures	$ (5,627	)	$ (4,515	)	$ (1,112	)
Other investing items	(161	)	(130	)	(31	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$ (5,788	)	$ (4,645	)	$ (1,143	)

The variance relates primarily to an increase in capital expenditures due to higher overall investments in the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure and Commercial Renewables segments.

FINANCING CASH FLOWS

The following table summarizes key components of Duke Energy’s financing cash flows.

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018		Variance
Issuances of long-term debt, net	$ 2,467		$ 537		$ 1,930
Issuances of common stock	27		820		(793	)
Issuances of preferred stock	973		—		973
Notes payable and commercial paper	324		1,131		(807	)
Dividends paid	(1,312	)	(1,199	)	(113	)
Other financing items	143		(24	)	167
Net cash provided by financing activities	$ 2,622		$ 1,265		$ 1,357

The variance was primarily due to:

• a $973 million increase in proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock; and

• a $1,930 million increase in proceeds from net issuances of long-term debt primarily due to the timing of issuances and redemptions of long-term debt.

Partially offset by:

• an $807 million decrease in net proceeds from issuances of notes payable and commercial paper primarily due to the use of proceeds from the preferred stock issuance and increased long-term debt issuances to pay down outstanding commercial paper; and

• a $793 million decrease in proceeds from the issuance of common stock due primarily to prior year issuances under equity forward agreements.

OTHER MATTERS

Environmental Regulations

The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, coal ash and other environmental matters. These regulations can be changed from time to time and result in new obligations of the Duke Energy Registrants. Refer to Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for further information regarding potential plant retirements and regulatory filings related to the Duke Energy Registrants.

121

MD&A OTHER MATTERS

Coal Ash Management Act of 2014

On March 26, 2019, NCDEQ granted Duke Energy’s application in part, extending by four months until December 1, 2019, the Coal Ash Act’s closure deadline applicable to the Sutton plant impoundments.

On April 1, 2019, NCDEQ issued a closure determination requiring Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress to excavate all remaining coal ash impoundments at the Allen, Belews Creek, Rogers, Marshall, Mayo and Roxboro facilities in North Carolina. With respect to the final six sites, which NCDEQ has ruled as low risk, science and engineering support a variety of closure methods including capping in place and hybrid cap-in-place as appropriate solutions that protect public health and the environment. On April 26, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed Petitions for Contested Case Hearings in the Office of Administrative Hearings to challenge NCDEQ’s April 1 Order. For more information, see Note 4, "Commitments and Contingencies," to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Duke Energy estimates the undiscounted, unadjusted cost to close the remaining impoundments by excavation, as outlined in the NCDEQ closure determination, will be approximately $4 billion to $5 billion more than the prior project cost estimate of $5.6 billion in the aggregate for the closure for all Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress impoundments. Excavation would likely extend beyond the required federal and state deadlines for impoundment closure. Duke Energy intends to seek recovery of all costs through the ratemaking process consistent with previous proceedings. AROs recorded on the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2019 , and December 31, 2018 , include the legal obligation for closure of coal ash basins and the disposal of related ash as a result of the Coal Ash Act, the EPA CCR rule and other agreements. For more information, see Note 7, "Asset Retirement Obligations," to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Duke Energy has completed excavation of all coal ash at the Riverbend plant and coal ash regulated by the Coal Ash Act at the Dan River and Sutton plants.

North Carolina Competitive Procurement

Based on an independent evaluation process, Duke Energy will own or purchase a total of 551 MW of renewable energy from projects under the North Carolina’s CPRE program. The process used was approved by the NCUC to select projects that would deliver the lowest cost renewable energy for customers. Five Duke Energy projects, totaling about 190 MW, were selected during the competitive bidding process. Duke Energy has completed the contracting process for the winning projects; there will be a second tranche for CPRE that is scheduled to occur in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 , there were no material changes to Duke Energy’s off-balance sheet arrangements. See Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Variable Interest Entities," for a discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements regarding ACP. For additional information on Duke Energy’s off-balance sheet arrangements, see “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Duke Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 .

Contractual Obligations

Duke Energy enters into contracts that require payment of cash at certain specified periods, based on certain specified minimum quantities and prices. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 , there were no material changes in Duke Energy's contractual obligations. For an in-depth discussion of Duke Energy’s contractual obligations, see “Contractual Obligations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Duke Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 .

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 , there were no material changes to the Duke Energy Registrants' disclosures about market risk. For an in-depth discussion of the Duke Energy Registrants' market risks, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Item 7 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Duke Energy Registrants.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Duke Energy Registrants in the reports they file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms.

Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Duke Energy Registrants in the reports they file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Duke Energy Registrants have evaluated the effectiveness of their disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2019 , and, based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance of compliance.

122

MD&A OTHER MATTERS

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Duke Energy Registrants have evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2019 , and have concluded no change has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

123

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For information regarding material legal proceedings, including regulatory and environmental matters, see Note 3 , "Regulatory Matters," and Note 4 , "Commitments and Contingencies," to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information, see Item 3, "Legal Proceedings," in Duke Energy's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be given to the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Duke Energy Registrants' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 , which could materially affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ financial condition or future results.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

124

EXHIBITS

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits filed herein are designated by an asterisk (). All exhibits not so designated are incorporated by reference to a prior filing, as indicated. Items constituting management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements are designated by a double asterisk (). The company agrees to furnish upon request to the commission a copy of any omitted schedules or exhibits upon request on all items designated by a triple asterisk (**).

Exhibit		Duke	Duke — Energy	Progress	Duke — Energy	Duke — Energy	Duke — Energy	Duke — Energy
Number		Energy	Carolinas	Energy	Progress	Florida	Ohio	Indiana	Piedmont
4.1	Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 24, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 24, 2019, File No. 1-6196).								X
4.2	Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 7, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2019, File No. 1-32853).	X
*10.1	Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement between Duke Energy Business Services, LLC, as agent for and on behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas Company Inc. and Matrix Service, Inc., dated as of April 30, 2019. (Portions of the exhibit have been omitted for confidentiality.)								X
10.2	$1,000,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2019, among Duke Energy Corporation, the Lenders party thereto, The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent, PNC Bank, National Association, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and TD Bank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, and Bank of China, New York Branch, BNP Paribas, Santander Bank, N.A., and U.S. Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2019, File No. 1-32853).	X
*10.3	Decommissioning Services Agreement between Duke Energy Florida, LLC, and ADP CR3, LLC, and ADP SF1, LLC. (Portions of the exhibit have been omitted for confidentiality.)					X
*31.1.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*31.1.2	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.		X
*31.1.3	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.			X
*31.1.4	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X
*31.1.5	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.					X
*31.1.6	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.						X
*31.1.7	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.							X

125

EXHIBITS

*31.1.8	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2.1	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*31.2.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*31.2.3	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*31.2.4	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*31.2.5	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*31.2.6	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*31.2.7	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*31.2.8	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.1.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.1.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.1.3	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.1.4	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.1.5	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.1.6	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.1.7	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.1.8	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.2.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.2.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X
*32.2.3	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	X

126

EXHIBITS

*32.2.4	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X
*32.2.5	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.					X
*32.2.6	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.						X
*32.2.7	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.							X
*32.2.8	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.								X
*101.INS	XBRL Instance Document (this does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X
*101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X
*101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X
*101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X
*101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X
*101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document.	X	X	X	X	X	X	X	X

The total amount of securities of the registrant or its subsidiaries authorized under any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed as an exhibit does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The registrant agrees, upon request of the SEC, to furnish copies of any or all of such instruments to it.

127

SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:	August 6, 2019	DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC PROGRESS ENERGY, INC. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC. DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC. — /s/ STEVEN K. YOUNG
		Steven K. Young Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date:	August 6, 2019	/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBS
		Dwight L. Jacobs Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

128

AI Terminal

More from Duke Energy CORP

Talk to a Data Expert