DREADNOUGHT RESOURCES LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2024

Aug 18, 2024

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 19 August 2024

Thick High-Grade Niobium Intercepts from Gifford Creek Carbonatite

HIGHLIGHTS

• Assays have been received for 4 holes (402m) out of a 19 RC hole program (1,795m) from the Stinger niobium prospect (Figure 3) with significant intercepts including:

• CBRC176: 50m @ 0.9% Nb2O5 from 49m, including 20m @ 1.3% Nb2O5 from 56m CBRC174: 38m @ 0.5% Nb2O5 from 58m, including 6m @ 1.2% Nb2O5 from 60m

• CBRC175: 66m @ 0.4% Nb2O5 from 52m, with 15m @ 15.0% P2O5 from 103m

• Additional results are expected in August 2024, with planned follow-up drilling once all assays are received.

• Exploration RC drilling of the Two Peaks, Popeye and Diamonds gold prospects has commenced and will be followed by infill Resource drilling at the Star of Mangaroon. Assays from this drilling are expected in late September 2024.

Dreadnought Resources Limited (“Dreadnought”) is pleased to announce results from recent drilling at the 100% owned Gifford Creek Carbonatite, part of the Mangaroon project, located in the Gascoyne Region of Western Australia.

Dreadnought’s Managing Director, Dean Tuck, commented: “ The Gifford Creek Carbonatite has produced some of WA’s best niobium intercepts outside the Arunta Province and this program has delivered our thickest and highest-grade intercept to date. These results support our staged approach to assessing the Gifford Creek Carbonatite and highlight the significant potential at Stinger to host high-grade mineralisation. Next steps at Stinger include assessment of oxide mineralisation and identifying the fresh rock source of the niobium. We continue to see the potential for Mangaroon to evolve as a multicommodity critical metals hub within proximity to existing infrastructure with mutual benefit to pastoralists, existing ports and neighboring projects. We look forward to receiving the remaining assays from this program and designing follow up programs after our gold and base metal drilling, which is currently underway.”

==> picture [477 x 265] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Photo of the Topdrill RC rig drilling at the Stinger niobium prospect.

1

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017

ABN 40 119 031 864

SNAPSHOT – MANGAROON CRITICAL MINERALS

Mangaroon is 100% Owned

• 100% owned Mangaroon confirmed as a globally significant critical minerals complex with proven potential for rare earths (REE), niobium (Nb), scandium (Sc), titanium (Ti) and phosphorous (P).

Genuine Scale Potential Already at the Yin Ironstones

• Independent Yin Resource of 29.98Mt @ 1.04% TREO (ASX 30 Nov 2023) covers only ~4.6km of ~43km of strike - 87% Measured and Indicated (See Table 1) .

• Yin contains a higher NdPr to total rare earth oxides (“ NdPr:TREO ”) ratio than most REE deposits and >50% higher than the global average.

Significant, Growth and Multiple Critical Minerals Potential at the Gifford Creek Carbonatite

• The Gifford Creek Carbonatite and associated Ironstones is one of the largest carbonatite complexes in the world.

• Wide spaced drilling over <25% of the ~17km long Gifford Creek Carbonatite has already identified 4 zones of mineralisation containing rare earths, niobium, scandium, phosphorous and titanium. This makes for a potential multi-critical mineral mix of co-products with significant intercepts including:

CBRC115: 102m @ 1.1% TREO from 3m, including 29m @ 2.1% TREO from 76m

CBRC085: 48m @ 0.8% Nb2O5 from 30m, including 36m @ 1.0% Nb2O5 from 39m

CBRC148: 43m @ 11.9% P2O5 from 87m, including 24m @ 14.5% P2O5 from 105m to EOH

CBRC138: 12m @ 319ppm Sc from 48m and CBRC125: 10m @ 270ppm Sc from 18m

CBRC086: 72m @ 8.6% TiO2 from 12m, including 6m @ 12.8% TiO2 from 66m

Positive Metallurgy Results

• Metallurgical test work from Yin has performed well, achieving recoveries ranging from 85.9% to 92.8% at a concentrate grade of 10.76% to 15.31% Nd2O3+Pr6O11.

• REE at Yin is predominantly hosted in monazite which is amenable to commercial processing.

• ANSTO, a world-leader in the processing of critical and strategic metals, has demonstrated that the Yin monazite concentrate has excellent metallurgical recoveries using a conventional low-temperature acid bake/leach process and produces a high quality MREC containing 60.7% TREO (16.3% Nd2O3 and 4.4% Pr6O11) with ~94% recovery of Nd and Pr.

• Recent mineralogical work at the Gifford Creek Carbonatite has confirmed that the dominant niobium mineral is pyrochlore, which is a high niobium mineral (>50%) from which ~95% of global niobium is produced.

Global Strategic Imperative Driving Critical Minerals Growth

• Supply chain security and low carbon transition are imperatives against a backdrop of heightened geopolitical tension.

• Niobium is a critical mineral primarily used in high strength, low alloy steel with application to renewables, infrastructure and vehicles. The addition of a small amount of niobium increases the strength of steel whilst decreasing weight by ~30%.

• Niobium-based technology breakthroughs are being experienced in the battery sector where niobium is reducing electric vehicle charge times to ~5 minutes.

2

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

Overview of Drilling Program: Nb-REE Gifford Creek Carbonatite

The Gifford Creek Carbonatite and the Yin Ironstones together form one of the largest alkali-carbonatite complexes in the world (Figure 2). Carbonatite intrusions are known globally to host several different commodities including rare earths, niobium, phosphate, titanium and scandium, often as separate deposits within the same intrusion. Examples of this include Mt Weld in Australia, Ngualla in Tanzania, Araxa in Brazil and Bayan Obo in China.

Since the initial discovery of the Yin Ironstones and the Gifford Creek Carbonatite in 2021, Dreadnought’s focus has been on rare earths. To date only ~25% of the Gifford Creek Carbonatite has been tested with wide spaced first pass drilling. Importantly, 3 zones of mineralisation have been confirmed (C3, Stinger and Rocky Road) with significant niobium intercepts including:

CBRC085: 48m @ 0.8% Nb2O5 from 30m, including 36m @ 1.0% Nb2O5 from 39m CBRC111: 48m @ 0.7% Nb2O5 from 63m, including 9m @ 1.4% Nb2O5 from 72m CBRC125: 59m @ 0.6% Nb2O5 from 63m, including 19m @ 1.0% Nb2O5 from 99m CBRC110: 39m @ 0.6% Nb2O5 from 66m, including 3m @ 1.1% Nb2O5 from 81m CBRC138: 57m @ 0.6% Nb2O5 from 45m, including 3m @ 1.4% Nb2O5 from 90m

Recent mineralogical work has confirmed the presence of coarse grained (>0.30mm) pyrochlore miobium from both weathered and fresh magnesio-carbonatite.

==> picture [494 x 386] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Location of significant niobium mineralisation within the limited extent of drilling at the Gifford Creek Carbonatite. Inset image shows globally significant carbonatite complexes at Niobec, Araxa, Catalao II and Luni at similar scale highlighting the footprints of niobium mineralisation.

3

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

The recent 19 RC hole program (1,795m) was niobium focused and designed to:

• Test regional geophysical targets believed to be zones of deeper weathering or different phases of carbonatite;

• Test for extensions of the Stinger prospect which contains thick intervals of pyrochlore Nb mineralisation; and

• Provide further material for mineralogical and metallurgical characterisation.

A program sought to confirm and extend enriched carbonatite at the newly named Stinger and Rocky Road niobium prospects. Stinger and Rocky Road are both defined by niobium enrichment in saprolite and fresh carbonatite over areas of ~2,000m x 350m (Stinger) and ~1,000 x 200m (Rocky Road). Fresh niobium mineralisation is interpreted to be hosted in a dyke like geometry with a southwest dip within the Gifford Creek Carbonatite, similar to Catalao II Complex in Brazil. Subject to assays, follow up drilling at these prospects will consist of fence line drilling to test for oxide mineralisation and the source of the fresh mineralisation.

Results have been received for the first 4 holes (402m) of the program designed to follow up previous wide spaced (320mx160m) first pass drilling. Importantly, 3 of these holes returned significant mineralisation, including the thickest and highest-grade intercept to date. Intercepts include:

CBRC176: 50m @ 0.9% Nb2O5 from 49m, including 20m @ 1.3% Nb2O5 from 56m

CBRC174: 38m @ 0.5% Nb2O5 from 58m, including 6m @ 1.2% Nb2O5 from 60m

CBRC175: 66m @ 0.4% Nb2O5 from 52m, with 15m @ 15.0% P2O5 from 103m

This program was supported by a co-funded drilling grant of up to $180,000 under the Geological Survey of Western Australia’s merit-based Exploration Incentive Scheme (“EIS”) and a drill-for-equity agreement with Topdrill Pty Ltd.

==> picture [442 x 366] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Cross section through the Stinger niobium prospect showing the location of previous mineralised intercepts. Also shown is recent RC drilling in relation to the saprolite hosted mineralisation and conceptual fresh niobium enriched carbonatite dykes.

4

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

Background on Mangaroon (E08/3274, E8/3178, E09/2384, E09/2433, E09/2473, E08/3275, E08/3439, E09/2290, E09/2359, E09/2370, E09/2405, E09/2448, E09/2449, E09/2450, E09/2467, E09/2478, E09/2531, E09/2535, E09/2616, M09/91, M09/146, M09/147, M09/174, M09/175: 100%)

Mangaroon (Figure 4) covers >5,300kms[2] of the Mangaroon Zone in the Gascoyne Region of Western Australia and is comprised of:

• 45km long Money Intrusion (Ni-Cu-Co-PGE): containing high tenor magmatic Ni-Cu-Co-PGE.

• ~10km x 15km Mangaroon Gold Camp (Au, Cu-Au-Zn-Ag): where fractured, small-scale ownership has limited previous gold exploration with only ~200m of the >12km long Mangaroon Shear Zone having been drilled.

• ~ 43km long Yin Ironstone (REE): which already contains: an independent Resource of 20.06Mt @ 1.03% TREO (ASX 5 Jul 2023) over only ~4km of the ~43km of ironstones including an initial Indicated Resource of 5.52Mt @ 1.23% TREO over only ~250m of strike (ASX 5 Jul 2023).

• ~17km long Gifford Creek Carbonatites (Nb-REE-Ti-P-Sc): which contains a suite of critical minerals and an initial independent Inferred Resource of 10.84Mt @ 1.00% TREO at C3 (ASX 28 Aug 2023).

==> picture [347 x 466] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Location map of Dreadnought’s 100% owned Mangaroon Project in relation to other Nb-REE Projects within

Western Australia and major infrastructure.

5

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

For further information please refer to previous ASX announcements:	For further information please refer to previous ASX announcements:
• 12 September 2022	Star of Mangaroon Acquisition & Consolidation
• 17 October 2022	Mineralised Carbonatites Discovered at C3 and C4
• 23 November 2022	Multiple, Large Scale, REE-Nb-Ti-P Carbonatites
• 28 December 2022	Initial High-Grade, Independent Resource over 3kms at Yin
• 24 January 2023	Carbonatite Discovery Shaping up as Regional Rare Earth Source
• 3 April 2023	Carbonatites Deliver Thick, Near Surface REE Results
• 10 July 2023	High Grade Rare Earth & Niobium Zones at C3 & C5
• 17 July 2023	High Grade Rare Earth & Niobium Zones at C3 & C5
• 7 August 2023	Rare Earth Ironstone and Carbonatite Drilling Update
• 28 August 2023	Initial, Independent REE-Nb-P-Ti-Sc Resource at C3
• 2 October 2023	Mangaroon Carbonatite now >17km – Higher Grade Zones Fingerprinted
• 6 December 2023	Gifford Creek REE-Nb-P-Ti-Sc Carbonatite Drilling Update
• 11 December 2023	Thick, High-Grade Gold Including 7m @ 23.0g/t Au
• 6 June 2024	Gifford Creek REE-Nb Carbonatite Update
• 27 May 2024	High Grade Cu-Zn-Ag-Au Gossans at Tiger
• 18 June 2024	Tiger Cu-Au-Zn-Ag Gossan Confirmed Over ~500m
• 12 August 2024	Gifford Creek Niobium Drilling Update

UPCOMING NEWSFLOW

August: Results of further target generation and definition work at Mangaroon Au (100%)

August: Results from Nb-REE at the Gifford Creek Carbonatite (Mangaroon 100%)

August: Presenting at the Australian Gold Conference 2024 in Sydney August/September: Results from EIS co-funded IP surveys at Tarraji-Yampi (80%/100%) August/September: Results from drilling at Tarraji-Yampi (80/100%)

September: Results from Nb-REE at the Gifford Creek Carbonatite (Mangaroon 100%) September: Annual Financial Report

September/October: Results from Au and Cu-Au-Zn-Ag drilling at Mangaroon (100%) October: Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Report

October/November: Results from Nb-REE at the Gifford Creek Carbonatite (Mangaroon 100%)

28 November: Annual General Meeting

~Ends~

For further information please contact: Dean Tuck Jessamyn Lyons Managing Director Company Secretary Dreadnought Resources Limited Dreadnought Resources Limited E: dtuck@dreres.com.au E: jlyons@dreres.com.au

This announcement is authorised for release to the ASX by the Board of Dreadnought.

6

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

Cautionary Statement

This announcement and information, opinions or conclusions expressed in the course of this announcement contains forecasts and forwardlooking information. Such forecasts, projections and information are not a guarantee of future performance, involve unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results and developments will almost certainly differ materially from those expressed or implied. There are a number of risks, both specific to Dreadnought, and of a general nature which may affect the future operating and financial performance of Dreadnought, and the value of an investment in Dreadnought including and not limited to title risk, renewal risk, economic conditions, stock market fluctuations, commodity demand and price movements, timing of access to infrastructure, timing of environmental approvals, regulatory risks, operational risks, reliance on key personnel, reserve estimations, native title risks, cultural heritage risks, foreign currency fluctuations, and mining development, construction and commissioning risk.

Competent Person’s Statement – Mineral Resources

The information in this announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr. Lynn Widenbar, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. Widenbar is a full-time employee of Widenbar and Associates Pty Ltd. Mr. Widenbar has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that is being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr. Widenbar consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context that the information appears.

Competent Person’s Statement – Exploration Results and Exploration Targets

The information in this announcement that relates to geology, exploration results and planning, and exploration targets was compiled by Mr. Dean Tuck, who is a Member of the AIG, Managing Director, and shareholder of the Company. Mr. Tuck has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr. Tuck consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.

The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information in the original reports, and that the forma and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original reports.

RESOURCES SUMMARY

Yin Ironstone Complex – Yin, Yin South, Y2, Sabre Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources

Table 1: Summary of Yin Resources at 0.20% TREO Cut-off.

Resource Classification	Geology	Resource (Mt)	TREO (%)	Nd2O3+Pr6O11 (kg/t)	NdPr:TREO Ratio(%)	Contained TREO(t)	Contained Nd2O3+Pr6O11(t)
Measured	Oxide	2.47	1.61	4.6	29	39,700	11,400
Measured	Fresh	2.70	1.09	3.0	27	29,500	8,100
Measured	Subtotal	5.17	1.34	3.8	28	69,300	19,500
Indicated	Oxide	13.46	1.06	3.1	29	142,600	41,000
Indicated	Fresh	7.67	0.95	2.8	29	72,800	21,300
Indicated	Subtotal	21.13	**1.02 **	3.0	29	215,400	62,300
Inferred	Oxide	1.51	0.75	1.9	25	11,200	2,800
Inferred	Fresh	2.17	0.75	2.1	28	16,300	4,500
Inferred	Subtotal	3.68	0.75	2.0	27	27,600	7,300
Total	Oxide	17.44	1.11	3.2	29	193,600	55,300
Total	Fresh	12.54	0.95	2.7	29	118,700	33,900
TOTAL		29.98	**1.04 **	2.9	29	312,300	89,300

Gifford Creek Carbonatite – Inferred Resource

Table 2: Summary of the Gifford Creek Carbonatite Inferred Resource at various % TREO Cut-offs.

Cut-Off (%TREO)	Resource (Mt)	TREO (%)	NdPr:TREO (%)	Nb2O5 (%)	P2O5 (%)	TiO2 (%)	Sc (ppm	) Contained TREO (t)	Contained Nb2O5 (t)
0.90	5.73	1.18	21	0.25	3.8	5.4	92	67,500	14,500
0.70	10.84	1.00	21	0.22	3.5	4.9	85	108,000	23,700
0.50	20.55	0.80	21	0.15	3.0	3.9	68	164,600	31,100
0.30	45.87	0.58	21	0.10	2.7	3.0	52	265,300	44,800

7

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS

==> picture [247 x 329] intentionally omitted <==

Kimberley Ni-Cu-Au Project (80/100%)

The project is located only 85kms from Derby in the West Kimberley region of WA and was locked up as a Defence Reserve since 1978.

The project has outcropping mineralisation and historical workings which have seen no modern exploration.

Results to date indicate that there may be a related, large scale, Proterozoic Cu-Au VMS system at Tarraji-Yampi, similar to DeGrussa and Monty in the Bryah Basin.

Mangaroon Ni-Cu-Co-3PGE, Au & REE Project (100%)

Mangaroon covers ~5,300kms[2] and is located 250kms south-east of Exmouth in the Gascoyne Region of WA. At the Money Intrusion, Ni-Cu-Co-3PGE has been identified. Dreadnought also has areas of outcropping high-grade gold including the historic Star of Mangaroon and Diamond gold mines. In addition, Mangaroon has emerged as a globally significant, rapidly growing, potential source of critical minerals. Highlights include:

• An Exploration Target estimated for the top 150m of ~40km of the Yin REE Ironstone Complex (ASX 13 Feb 2023).

• An independent Resource for Yin Ironstones Complex of 29.98Mt @ 1.04% TREO over only ~4.6kms – including a Measured and Indicated Resource of 26.3Mt @ 1.04% TREO (ASX 30 Nov 2023).

• Regional source of rare earths at the Gifford Creek Carbonatite totaling ~17kms x ~1km (ASX 7 Aug 2023).

• A large, independent initial Resource of 10.84Mt @ 1.00% TREO at the Gifford Creek Carbonatites, containing a range of critical minerals including rare earths, niobium, phosphate, titanium and scandium (ASX 28 Aug 2023).

Central Yilgarn Gold, Base Metals, Critical Minerals & Iron Ore Project (100%)

Central Yilgarn is located ~190km northwest of Kalgoorlie in the Yilgarn Craton. The project comprises ~1,400kms[2] covering ~150km of strike along the majority of the Illaara, Yerilgee, South Elvire and Evanston greenstone belts. Central Yilgarn is prospective for typical Archean mesothermal lode gold deposits, VMS base metals, komatiitehosted nickel sulphides and critical metals including Lithium-Cesium-Tantalum.

Prior to consolidation by Dreadnought, the Central Yilgarn was predominantly held by iron ore explorers and remains highly prospective for iron ore.

Bresnahan HREE-Au-U Project (100%)

Bresnahan is located ~125km southwest of Newman in the Ashburton Basin. The project comprises ~3,700kms[2] covering over 200kms strike along the Bresnahan Basin / Wyloo Group unconformity. Bresnahan is prospective for unconformity related heavy rare earth (“ HREE ”) deposits similar to Browns Range HREE deposits, unconformity uranium (“ U ”) deposits and mesothermal lode gold similar to Paulsens Au-Ag-Sb deposits along strike.

Prior to consolidation by Dreadnought, the Bresnahan Basin had been successfully explored for unconformity uranium with limited exploration for mesothermal gold. Bresnahan is a first mover opportunity to explore for unconformity HREE.

8

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

Table 3: Significant Intersections >0.3%Nb2O5, >1.0% Nb2O5 highlighted.

Hole ID	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Nb2O5 (%)	TREO (%)	P2O5 (%)	Prospect
CBRC174	58	96	38	0.5	0.7	3.8	Gifford Creek Carbonatite
Incl.	60	66	6	1.2	1.3	4.2
CBRC175 Incl	52	118	66	0.4	0.6	7.0
	103	118	15	0.4	0.5	15.0
CBRC176	49	99	50	0.9	1.0	4.8
Incl	53	95	42	1.0	1.1	4.6
Incl	56	76	20	1.3	1.3	3.9
CBRC177	No Significant Results
CBRC178	Assays Pending
CBRC179 CBRC180	Assays Pending
	Assays Pending
CBRC181 CBRC182 CBRC183	Assays Pending
	Assays Pending
	Assays Pending
CBRC184	Assays Pending
CBRC185	AssaysPending
CBRC186	AssaysPending
CBRC187 CBRC188	AssaysPending
	AssaysPending

		Table 4: DrillCollar Data (GDA94 MGAz50)	Table 4: DrillCollar Data (GDA94 MGAz50)	Table 4: DrillCollar Data (GDA94 MGAz50)	Table 4: DrillCollar Data (GDA94 MGAz50)
Hole ID	Easting	Northing	RL	Dip	Azimuth	EOH	**Type **	Prospect
CBRC174	416930	7347706	311	-60	31	96	RC	GCC
CBRC175	416902	7347650	309	-60	32	126	RC
CBRC176	416874	7347602	308	-60	29	108	RC
CBRC177	416774	7347762	311	-90	0	72	RC
CBRC178	417058	7347614	313	-90	0	55	RC
CBRC179	418475	7346758	315	-90	0	120	RC
CBRC180	420351	7345128	300	-90	0	108	RC
CBRC181	421512	7344421	300	-90	0	96	RC
CBRC182	420500	7344289	300	-90	0	108	RC
CBRC183	421442	7343434	300	-90	0	90	RC
CBRC184	419313	7345338	300	-90	0	90	RC
CBRC185	418723	7346770	310	-90	0	102	RC
CBRC186	418842	7346427	314	-90	0	66	RC
CBRC187	419133	7346357	314	-90	0	90	RC
CBRC188	418903	7346052	315	-90	0	114	RC
CBRC189	417057	7347608	314	-90	0	108	RC
CBRC190	414130	7349350	309	-90	0	72	RC
CBRC191	413569	7349755	311	-90	0	72	RC
CBRC192	413164	7350471	307	-90	0	102	RC

9

ASX:DRE

+61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report Template Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	**JORC Code explanation **	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling techniques	• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling was undertaken to produce samples for assaying. Laboratory Analysis Two sampling techniques were utilised for this program, 1m metre splits directly from the rig sampling system for each metre and 3m composite sampling from spoil piles. Samples submitted to the laboratory were determined by the site geologist. 1m Splits From every metre drilled a 2-3kg sample (split) was sub- sampled into a calico bag via a Metzke cone splitter from each metre of drilling. 3m Composites All remaining spoil from the sampling system was collected in buckets from the sampling system and neatly deposited in rows adjacent to the rig. An aluminium scoop was used to then sub-sample each spoil pile to create a 2-3kg 3m composite sample in a calico bag. A pXRF is used on site to determine mineralised samples. Mineralised intervals have the 1m split collected, while unmineralised samples have 3m composites collected. All samples are submitted to either ALS Laboratories in Perth for determination of Rare Earth Oxides by Lithium Borate Fusion XRF (ALS Method ME-XRF30) or Intertek Minerals in Perth for determination of Rare Earth Oxides by Lithium Borate Fusion XRF (Intertek Method FB6/OM45). All 1m samples are also submitted for 48 multi-elements via 4 acid digestion with MS/ICP finish (ALS Code ME-MS61 or Intertek Code 4A/MS48) to assist with lithological interpretation. All samples are submitted to ALS Laboratories in Perth for determination of Rare Earth Oxides by Lithium Borate Fusion XRF (ALS Method MEXRF30). Select samples are also submitted for 48 multielements via 4 acid digestion with MS/ICP finish (ALS Code ME-MS61) to assist with lithological interpretation. QAQC samples consisting of duplicates, blanks and CRM’s (OREAS Standards) were inserted through the program at a rate of 1:50 samples. Duplicate samples are submitted as quarter core or as a B-bag from the Metzke’s cone splitter.
Drilling techniques	• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).	RC Drilling Topdrill undertook the program utilising a truck mounted Schramm T685WS drill rig with additional air from an auxiliary compressor and booster. Bit size was ½ ”.
Drill sample recovery	• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	RC Drilling Drilling was undertaken using a ‘best practice’ approach to achieve maximum sample recovery and quality through the mineralised zones. Best practice sampling procedure included: suitable usage of dust suppression, suitable shroud, lifting off bottom between each metre, cleaning of sampling equipment, ensuring a dry sample and suitable supervision by the supervising geologist to ensure good sample quality. At this stage, no known bias occurs between sample recovery and grade. At this stage, no known bias occurs between sample recovery andgrade.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been geologically andgeotechnically logged to a level of detail to support	RC Drilling RC chips were logged byaqualifiedgeologist with sufficient
dreadnoughtresources.com.au			10

10

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

Criteria	**JORC Code explanation **	Commentary
	appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	experience in this geological terrane and relevant styles of mineralisation using an industry standard logging system which could eventually be utilised within a Mineral Resource Estimation. Lithology, mineralisation, alteration, veining, weathering and texture were all recorded digitally. Chips were washed each metre and stored in chip trays for preservation and future reference. RC pulp material is also analysed on the rig by pXRF, scintillometer and magnetic susceptibility meter to assist with logging and the identification of mineralisation. Logging is qualitative, quantitative or semi-quantitative in nature.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation	• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	RC Drilling From every metre drilled, a 2-3kg sample (split) was sub- sampled into a calico bag via a Metzke cone splitter. QAQC in the form of duplicates and CRM’s (OREAS Standards) were inserted through the ore zones at a rate of 1:50 samples. Additionally, within mineralised zones, a duplicate sample was taken and a blank inserted directly after. 2-3kg samples are submitted to ALS laboratories (Perth), oven dried to 105°C and pulverised to 85% passing 75um to produce a 0.66g charge for determination of Rare Earth Oxides by Lithium Borate Fusion XRF (ALS Method ME- XRF30) and to produce a 0.25g charge for determination of 48 multi-elements via 4 acid digestion with MS/ICP finish (ALS Code ME-MS61). Standard laboratory QAQC is undertaken and monitored.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) andprecision have been established.	Laboratory Analysis Lithium borate fusion is considered a total digest and Method ME-XRF30 and FB6/OM45 are appropriate for REE, P2O5, TiO2 determination. ME-MS61 and 4A/MS48 are considered a near total digest and is appropriate for Sc determination. Standard laboratory QAQC is undertaken and monitored by the laboratory and by the company upon assay result receival.
Verification of sampling and assaying	• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	Logging and Sampling Logging and sampling were recorded directly into a digital logging system, verified and eventually stored in an offsite database. Significant intersections are inspected by senior company personnel. 10 pairs of twinned RC and DD holes have been drilled at this time and compared to validate the RC drilling. No adjustments to any assay data have been undertaken.
Location of data points	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	Collar position was recorded using a Emlid Reach RS2 RTK GPS system (+/- 0.2m x/y, +/-0.5m z). GDA94 Z50s is the grid format for all xyz data reported. Azimuth and dip of the drill hole was recorded after the completion of the hole using a Reflex Sprint IQ Gyro. A reading was undertaken every 30thmetre with an accuracy of +/- 1° azimuth and +/-0.3° dip.
Data spacing and distribution	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied.	See table 4 hole positions and information.

11

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017

ABN 40 119 031 864

Criteria	**JORC Code explanation **	Commentary
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	Orientation of residual mineralisation is interpreted to be flat lying near the base of weathering for which vertical drill holes are generally perpendicular and represent truth thickness. Fresh mineralisation is interpreted to have a dyke like geometry with a southerly dip, based off the resource drilling at C3. Angled drill holes are interpreted to be generally perpendicular to this mineralisation. No sample biasisknownat this time.
Sample security	• The measures taken to ensure sample security.	All geochemical samples were collected, bagged, and sealed by Dreadnought staff and delivered to Exmouth Haulage in Exmouth. Samples were delivered directly to ALS Laboratories Perth by Exmouth Haulage out of Exmouth and Jarrahbar Contracting out of Carnarvon.
Audits or reviews	• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	The program is continuously reviewed by senior company personnel.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	**JORC Code explanation **	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	The Mangaroon Project consists of 21 granted Exploration License (E08/3178, E08/3229, E08/3274, E08/3275, E08/3439, E09/2290, E09/2359, E09/2370, E09/2384, E09/2405, E09/2422, E09/2433, E09/2448, E09/2449, E09/2450, E09/2467, E09/2473, E09/2478, E09/2531, E09/2535, E09/2616), 1 pending Exploration License (E08/3539) and 5 granted Mining Licenses (M09/91, M09/146, M09/147, M09/174, M09/175). All tenements are 100% owned by Dreadnought Resources. E08/3178, E09/2370, E09/2384 and E09/2433 are subject to a 2% Gross Revenue Royalty held by Beau Resources. E08/3274, E08/3275, E09/2433, E09/2448, E09/2449, E09/2450 are subject to a 1% Gross Revenue Royalty held by Beau Resources. E09/2359 is subject to a 1% Gross Revenue Royalty held by Prager Pty Ltd. E09/2422, E08/*3229 and E08/3539 are subject to a 1% Gross Revenue Royalty held by Redscope Enterprises Pty Ltd. E09/2290, M09/146 and M09/147 are subject to a 1% Gross Revenue Royalty held by STEHN, Anthony Paterson and BROWN, Michael John Barry. M09/174 is subject to a 0.5% Gross Revenue Royalty held by STEHN, Anthony Paterson. M09/175 is subject to a 0.5% Gross Revenue Royalty held by STEHN, Anthony Paterson and BROWN, Michael John Barry. M09/91 is subject to a 1% Gross Royalty held by DOREY, Robert Lionel. The Mangaroon Project covers 4 Native Title Determinations including the Budina (WAD131/2004), Thudgari (WAD6212/1998), Gnulli (WAD22/2019) and the Combined Thiin-Mah, Warriyangka, Tharrkari and Jiwarli (WAD464/2016). The Mangaroon Project is located over Lyndon, Mangaroon, Gifford Creek, Maroonah, Minnie Creek, Edmund, Williamburyand Towera Stations.
Exploration done by other parties	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	Historical exploration of a sufficiently high standard was carried out by a few parties which have been outlined and detailed in this ASX announcement including: Regional Resources 1986-1988s: WAMEX Reports A23715,

12

ASX:DRE +61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017 ABN 40 119 031 864

Criteria	**JORC Code explanation **	Commentary
		23713 Peter Cullen 1986: WAMEX Report A36494 Carpentaria Exploration Company 1980: WAMEX Report A9332 Newmont 1991: WAMEX Report A32886 Hallmark Gold 1996: WAMEX Report A49576 Rodney Drage 2011: WAMEX Report A94155 Sandfire Resources 2005-2012: WAMEX Report 94826
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	The Mangaroon Project is located within Mangaroon Zone of the Gascoyne Province. The Mangaroon Project is prospective for orogenic gold, VMS base metals, magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation and carbonatite hosted Nb-REEs.
Drill hole information	• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	An overview of the drilling program is given within the text and tables within this document.
Data aggregation methods	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	All results greater than 0.3% Nb2O5have been reported. Significant intercepts are length weight averaged for all samples with Nb2O5values >0.3% Nb2O5with up to 3m of internal dilution (<0.3% Nb2O5). No metal equivalents are reported.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).	Drilling is undertaken close to perpendicular to the dip and strike of the mineralisation.
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	Refer to figures within this report.
Balanced reporting	• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	The accompanying document is a balanced report with a suitable cautionary note.
Other substantive exploration data	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	Suitable commentary of the geology encountered are given within the text of this document.

13

ASX:DRE

+61 (08) 9473 8345 info@dreres.com.au Unit 1, 4 Burgay Court Osborne Park WA 6017

ABN 40 119 031 864

Criteria

Further work

JORC Code explanation

• The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

Commentary

Additional RC drilling Diamond Drilling Metallurgical test work Additional Resource Modelling

14