AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

Dovalue

Management Reports Jun 19, 2018

4145_bfr_2018-06-19_8f983451-cf6e-4096-b91a-aeaf60467384.pdf

Management Reports

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

doBank Business Plan 2018-2020

London June 19, 2018

Today speakers

Andrea Mangoni Fabio Balbinot Carlo Vernuccio

Group CEO Head of Servicing Head of NPL Management

Stathis Andrianakis Andrea Giovanelli

doBank Hellas Manager

Head of UTP & Banking

Manuela Franchi

Chief Financial Officer

Section Speaker Indicative Timetable
Strategic highlights of business plan 2018-2020 Andrea Mangoni 09:30 10:00
Deep dive on market opportunity Fabio Balbinot, Stathis Andrianakis 10:00 10:40
1st Q&A session 10:40 11:00
Coffee break 11:00 11:15
The NPL factory Carlo Vernuccio, Andrea Giovanelli 11:15 11:55
Financial review Manuela Franchi 11:55 12.20
Closing remarks Andrea Mangoni 12.20 12:25
2nd Q&A session 12:25 12:50
Lunch 12:50

Strategic highlights of business plan 2018-2020

Andrea Mangoni – Group CEO

doBank today

Leader in the largest NPL market in Europe

  • Servicing €88bn GBV in Italy
  • Highest rated by S&P and Fitch
  • "Pure play" servicer with asset light business model
  • Among the few European independent servicers

Focused on high value-added NPL value chain

  • Corporate: 71% of GBV
  • Secured: 80% of GBV
  • Mid/large loan size:
  • €120k avg. loan size
  • 53% of loans > €500k
  • Diversified: banks 31%, investors 69% of GBV

Highly visible revenue base

  • Ca. 90% of revenues from long-term contracts
  • Base fees help cover fixed cost and optimize collections timing
  • Strong profitability and cash flows
  • Business can grow scale without adding meaningful costs
  • 92% operating cash flow conversion
Key figures 2017
Large portfolio and
best-in-class collections
GBV
1Q 18
€88bn
Collections €1.8bn
Highly visible revenues and Gross
revenues
€213m
scalable operating platform EBITDA
margin
33%
High cash conversion and Dividend
pay-out
70%
dividend pay-out Net Cash
position
€39m

Unique business model combining growth, stable cash flows and defensive/countercyclical features

Strategic pillars of IPO plan

Plan execution: a solid base for continued growth

Track record since IPO

Assumptions of IPO plan Execution in 2017 and 1Q18
Grow GBV
Add new GBV (ca. €18bn by 2019)

Increase client diversification and
contract length

Increase weight of investors vs. banks
(40%/60% at IPO)
+€3bn in 2017, +€12bn in 1Q18 already

All new GBV won from new clients with longer average

portfolio maturity

Investors at 69% of GBV vs 40% at IPO
Above
expectations
Improve
Collections

Growth in absolute collections

Collect more per unit of GBV

Collect more per employee
+3% in FY 2017 despite declining GBV

Collection rate at 2.4% from 2.1% in 2016


Collections/FTE at €2.5m from €2.2m in 2016
In line with
expectations
Develop
Ancillary
revenues

Ancillary and other revenues at 10% of
Group revenues by 2020

Grow client base and product offer

Ancillary at 9.3% of Group revenues in 1Q18

New contracts with FINO and Unicredit in 2H17, new
data quality and judicial management services in 1Q
18
In line with
expectations
Grow
profitability
/operating
leverage
Significantly expand margins

Grow GBV with little extra cost


Cost reduction in IT/SG&A/RE

33% EBITDA margin in FY 2017 (31% in 2016)

Stable cost base despite growing revenues
Tangible results from SG&A/RE cost cutting (-16%YoY)
In line with
expectations
Generate
Cash flow
and pay out
dividends

Maintain a high cash conversion

Pay-out at least 65% of net income

Grow net cash position for
co-investment and M&A opportunities

92% operating cash flow conversion in FY2017

70% dividend payout on 2017 net income

€30m co-investment
Net Cash position at €48m in 1Q18
Above
expectations

Improvements in all main metrics

Main operational achievements during last 12 months

In 2017 and in 1Q 18, doBank reached important results also in terms of operational target sustaining its financial growth and confirming its capability to manage large and complex transactions

FINO on-boarding

€17bn portfolio on-boarded both as master and special servicer

New Contracts on-boarding

doBank on-boarded €12bn of new contracts (of which more than €8bn from MPS securitization)

Greece set-up

Branch setup obtaining the authorization to operate through passporting process First international branch of the Group, fully operational, ready to on-board and active in business development

Massive on-boarding operations and first international venture confirming doBank's execution capabilities

Distinctive positioning in the NPL value chain

Today's objectives

1 Present the targeted new transformational Group Structure

From a banking Group to a corporate structure with separate
banking license unlocking capital potentials for M&A
2 Update on market opportunities ahead of us

Extract value from current bad loans scenario in Italy
Significant potential in contiguous markets
3 Describe doBank's
unique operating platform

"Open the box" to explain the complexity and uniqueness of the
business model
4 Share an ambitious cost efficiency and ICT investment plan
Confirm inherent operating leverage, disruptive actions on fixed

cost base and IT investments to confirm innovation edge
5 Targets 2018-2020
Present doBank in 2020: a larger, stronger, more diversified, more profitable company

Transformational Project: from a Banking to a Servicing group with separate banking license

  • Heritage "banking Group" status limits growth potential
  • Most of doBank competitors are not banks both in Italy and abroad
  • Banking activities today add limited upside under current group structure
  • M&A capped by capital requirements

Today Tomorrow

  • Simpler regulatory framework
  • Fully exploit debt capacity to grow current platform in Italy, Greece and other international markets, creating value for shareholders
  • Greater focus of business units with specialized product offering by company
  • Higher economies of scale
  • Maintain benefits of banking license
  • Cost synergies and cost reduction
  • Tax efficiencies

doBank is today better equipped to exploit further market opportunities

How the Group re-organization will be executed upon regulatory clearance

  • New structure envisages a Servicing Group with a banking subsidiary, in line with new business mix
  • Regulatory process initiated in May with Bank of Italy/ECB, targeted completion by year-end

New Group structure unlocking full potential of servicing business

    1. Art.115 TULPS (public security law) and following sections regulate the special servicing licensing and activity for non banking and non financial companies
    1. Previously IBIS
    1. Pending clearance by Bank of Italy
    1. Regulated by Bank of Italy

Most relevant economic benefits from transformational project

Align Corporate Structure to
actual business needs
The resulting structure of the Group will include:

The listed company that will operate as a pure Special Servicer ruled under

art. 115 and will also act as holding company
Italfondiario
specialized in Master Servicing and securitization services (ruled

under Art. 106 TUB)
New Bank specialized in UTP and Specialty Finance services creating potential

upside. doBank Hellas part of banking subsidiary
All current Master servicing activities of doBank transferred to Italfondiario
and all

Special Servicing of Italfondiario
transferred to doBank
Increased Investment
Capability
The creation of New Bank and Italfondiario
in line with the actual needs of the Group

will entail lower capital requirements
Enable the new listed holding company to raise leverage and free up capital to

finance M&A and compete with its European peers
Simplify regulatory framework Revisit regulatory implications and make more efficient control functions

Align the perimeter of the regulated activities to the actual businesses

The listed company subject to a simplified regulatory framework
Achieve operating synergies New Bank requires defined resources and independent outsourcing model

All Special Servicing and Ancillary services activities onto one single platform allow to

reduce operating costs
Tax efficiency from bank to corporate to be maintained in the long run (from 33% to

28%) despite re-alignment of DTA value in 2018/20191

New organizational structure

Rationale of new organizational structure

  • New organizational structure is part of Business Plan 2018- 2020
  • Reduction of direct reporting lines to CEO, streamlining decision making
  • Creation of new areas of responsibility:
  • Servicing: development and management of core business, ancillaries and Greek Branch
  • Operations: support functions, technology and data governance
  • UTP and banking: dedicated management of Unlikely to Pay servicing and new Bank

A streamlined reporting structure to facilitate decision making and Plan execution

Servicing market to offer significant growth potential

Market update doBank Strategy
s
s
e
n
si
u
b
e
r
o
C
Bad loans
servicing
Italy

Servicing market at ca.240bn in M/T

Regulatory framework still supportive, lots
of work to do for banks:
Total new inflows (including portfolio sales):

€84bn in 2018E, €20bn in 2019E, and €13bn
in 2020E

Growing outsourcing levels

Following jumbo deals, market focused on
mid-sized GACS transactions and platform
sales with long-term flow agreements

Maintain distinctive positioning

Protect premium pricing

Add revenues per unit of GBV

Deploy operating leverage
"Do more with less"
s
u
s
UTP
servicing
Italy
UTP exposures expected to become the next

area of focus for banks' asset quality

Servicing market at €18bn in 2018E,
expected at >€25bn in M/T

Maintain leadership in the Italian
market

Grow internal capabilities

Focus on product knowledge and client
relationship
o
s
e
u
n
g
si
ti
n
u
o
b
C
UTP and bad
loans
servicing
Greece
Early stage market with significant growth

potential and no incumbent

€40bn NPL reduction by 2019 target by
BoG/SSN out of more than €90bn total NPL
Finalizing first contract with 4

systemic banks

Establish leadership and transfer
operational excellence

Confirmed focus on core Italian Bad Loans market while adding new sources of growth by products and countries

doBank's unique operating model

  • Scalable infrastructure will support growth without incurring material costs
  • Huge local knowledge through the network across all the Italian courts

People: first pillar of doBank growth

  • Reward mechanisms are crucial for performance results and also for quality of management both internal and external
  • doBank currently trains both the internal and external network with courses dedicated to legal and out-of-court settlements, courses on the use of management software and portfolio management also through the use of ABI
Reward Mechanism Academy for new AMs
Basis Reference Key Features 6th edition of the doBank Group academy
Primary
target
Individual
& Team
Collection Divided in periods


Easy and clear
calculation target
as % of collection

730 participants to the program of which 150 asset
managers hired during the last years

Last edition in May 2018

More than 80 hours of in-class-training

Working side by side with experienced asset manager
Internal
Network
Secondary
target
Portfolio
(long
term)
Business
plan,
collection
distribution
index,
database
quality etc.

Bonus is paid if
the periodic target
are met

Bonus could be
doubled if the
Team hits the
annual target
Training

Credit Management

AML
Internal

Negotiation
resources

Risk Management
External
Network
Contest Individual
&
Company
Collection
Divided in periods
The contests are

linked to recovery
target or to
specific projects

Real Estate
~3,000
participants
External

Management Platform
lawyers &

Listening Meetings
consultants

IT capabilities – Transformation plan post migration

Migration of the IT Platforms into One

In parallel with the merger of the Special servicing activities of doBank and Italfondiario once transferred to doBank, the current doBank's portfolio will be migrated onto Italfondiario's proprietary platform (IFAMS – Italfondiario Asset Management System)

Implementation Expected results KPIs improvement
Management
workflow
integration
Higher collections efficiency Collection / Servicing FTEs
Consolidation of Higher workloads by asset manager Revenues / Servicing FTEs
proprietary IT
platform
IT cost savings IT running cost savings
Back office
rationalization
Efficiencies from back office automation Staff FTEs efficiency
Ongoing –
Expected
and rationalization

Migration of the IT Platform and merger of the Special Servicing activities will continue the improvement of Group's operating efficiency

closing in 1H19

Ambitious cost efficiency plan

Plan Milestones 2020 Targets vs. 2017
Outsourcing
Fees
Integration of IT platforms with right sizing of internal

and external network
Progressively reduce ratio of outsourcing fees on

gross revenues
Small loans: increase outsourcing


Medium and large loans: increase insourcing
HR costs
Geographical rationalization of staff and support
functions in line with new Group structure

New hiring related to new business
Despite revenue growth and ramp up of new

businesses, limited FTE growth vs revenue growth

Strengthen high potential new businesses

Optimize support and low growth potential
businesses
Real Estate
Costs

Re-organization of the geographical footprint

Rental cost of local offices under control

Smart working pilot

Continued cost reduction and footprint optimization
plan
SG&A Costs Continuous effort to control and rationalize SG&A

costs

Centralization of purchasing

Digitalization and automation of back-office
activities
Support startup and ramp up of new business,

expected to progressively reduce as a percentage
of revenues
IT Costs
IT investments to:

Maintain technological leadership in servicing

Reduce operating expenses already from 2019

Harvest the potential of own data through analytics

Investments in 2018 and 2019 to yield significant
tangible results from 2020 onwards

Baseline cost reduction due to operating efficiency
gains enabled by IT investments

EBITDA growth at >15% CAGR in 2017A-2020E

Key strategic pillars of doBank business plan

doBank in 2020 and beyond

2018E 2020E
Gross
Revenues

Gross revenues at more than €230m
New GBV additions at €15-17bn

total for the year 2018
Collections above €2bn


Protect premium pricing
Continue to grow revenue per GBV

8%-9% Gross Revenues CAGR in 2017A-2020E:
New GBV:


+€15bn in Italian bad loans (on top of 1Q18 GBV on
boarded)

Ramp-up UTP and Greek platform
New bank as potential upside


Protect premium pricing, growth in collection efficiency

Ancillaries to complete core business and provide
recurring revenues
EBITDA
and EPS
Ordinary EBITDA margin expansion


Increase in HR cost, partially
compensated by lower SG&A

Greek operations and UTP, new Bank
start-up costs of c.€3m
>15% EBITDA CAGR, EPS CAGR > EBITDA CAGR


Significant efficiencies coming on stream

Exploit operating leverage

doBank-Italfondiario
integration of management model

Impact of new Group organization
Cash flows
and leverage

Confirmed commitment to high-levels of cash conversion

Dividend payout policy confirmed at >65% of consolidated ordinary Net Income

Debt/Ebitda
New organizational structure to allow use of B/S strength for accretive M&A opportunities up to 3x Net

doBank in 2020: a more profitable and more diversified company

Deep dive on market opportunity

Fabio Balbinot – Head of Servicing Stathis Adrianakis – DoBank Hellas manager

European NPL servicing: highest potential in Southern Europe

Common attractive features in Italy, Greece and Southern Europe

  • Significant market size and complexity
  • Opportunity for doBank to leverage on its proven credit management track record
  • Need for specialized players to improve and speed-up collections in the system
  • Asset quality targets unlikely to be met through collections by banks' servicing units
  • Data, technology, process advantage of servicers unlocking superior collection rates

Footprint today

  • Italy: developed market where doBank entered 20 years ago and secured, large, attractive and long-term mandates
  • Greece: early stage market with no incumbent and possibility for doBank to transfer its Italian track record and positioning

NPL exposure and macro highlights

Servicing market potential – Screening criteria

  • Market size and deleveraging targets
  • Presence of global investors
  • Complex legal system
  • Collateral management
  • Market timing: servicing in early stage (greenfield entry) or in consolidation phase (M&A option)

Tier 2 targets Tier 1 targets

Macroeconomic view – moderate growth, below EU average

  • Italian macro indicators point towards a moderate improvement, pre and post new Government
  • 2018E GDP growth +1.5% (EU-28 avg. +2.3%)
  • 2018E unemployment rate 10.85% (EU-28 avg. +7.1%)
  • The real estate market is showing tangible signs of rebound:
  • Price levels steadily improving from the May 2015 low and up +1.2% on a YoY basis in April 2018 (Nonresidential +0.4%, Residential +1.4%)
  • Transaction volumes are picking up, led by industrial properties
  • Number of successful auctions increased by 71% since 2015 with nearly 30% of auctions resulting in sale1

Macroeconomic environment2

Real Estate transactions trend (2004-2016)3

Italian banking sector – asset and profitability trend

Italian banks - total loans and loan default rate1

Italian Banks RoTE vs Euribor 3M and Gov't bond yields (%)2

  • Italian banking system stabilized but still facing challenges:
  • Capital restored with capital ratio at about >13%
  • NPL coverage increased to 51%
  • Loans to both corporates and households still significantly below historical highs
  • Recent improvement in loan default rates but above pre-crisis levels
  • Depressed levels of profitability remain a key issue for the Italian banking sector, despite recent improvements
  • Increase in interest rate beneficial for Bank NII but challenge asset quality improvements
  • Sovereign risk impacting margins and capital

Better profitability and capital facilitate proactive asset quality management

1: Source: Bloomberg, Bank of Italy 2: Bloomberg, Company data

Top Italian Banks for NPL stock and main transactions

  • Looking forward, Italian banks have set ambitious asset quality targets and are focused on an accelerated execution
  • Role of independent servicers key to execution, internal platforms unlikely to be sufficient
  • doBank took a leading role in the most relevant transactions in the Italian NPL market confirming its leadership
Bank Bad Loans (€bn) Other NPLs
(€bn)
Total
(€bn)
NPL Ratio
Target1
Target
Year
Platform
acquirer
doBank
Client
34 18 52 6.0% 2021 doBank (2005)
Intrum (2018)
29 22 50 7.8% 2019 doBank (2015)
33 12
45
12.9% 2021 Sirio (2017)
16
10
26
12.9% 2019 Process announced
and ongoing
7
6
13
11.9% 2020 n.a.
9
4
13
n.a. n.a. n.a.
11
7
3
13.5% 2020 n.a.
5
3
2
16.4% 2020 Credito
Fondiario
(2017)

Source: Banks' FY reports 2017/business plans, PWC report: Update on the Italian NPL servicing market (June 2018) 1. Gross NPL Ratio Target

Italian banks NPLs expected to stay above EU average in M/T

There will be plenty of work to do on banks' asset quality in the medium term before the next cycle

Regulatory framework continues to be supportive

  • ECB became single supervisory mechanism taking over regulation of Europe's largest systemic banks
  • ECB implemented asset quality reviews increasing banks provisioning against NPLs

2014- 2016 GACS scheme

  • NPL securitizations backed by the Italian government to increase liquidity of the NPL market
  • Expires in September 2018 (possible renewal to the ECB)

ECB guidance on NPLs

Pressure on banks to review their strategies and operating models on NPLs reporting the NPL reduction plan

New accounting treatment under IFRS9

  • EBA enhanced disclosure guidance
  • Covering asset quality and NPLs and standardized data approach to all NPLs
  • Addendum to the ECB guidance on NPLs specified that all new NPLs must be provisioned within 2 years (unsecured) and 7 years (secured)
  • Expansion of the ECB guidance to less significant Banks

EBA guidelines on NPLs, Banks required to outline a strategy to reduce stock and avoid future build-ups

  • European Commission proposals facilitating cross border activity of NPL Servicers and investors and supporting out-of-court settlements
  • European Commission Recommendations to Italy to reduce NPL stock and length of legal procedures

2018

2017

A growing Italian NPL Servicing Market

  • Italian system still burdened by a significant stock of NPL in the medium term (over €300bn today)
  • Portfolio sales by banks and GACS securitizations represent a key tool to meet AQR targets while impact of internal workout units remains slow
  • Portfolio sales/de-consolidation trend supportive of increased NPL ownership by investors and higher involvement of independent servicers
  • Current doBank cautious planning assumptions assume no near-term negative economic cycle in Italy but a new economic cycle has positive impact on stock

  • Source: PWC report: "update on the Italian NPL servicing market (June 2018)"; data includes NPLs owned by both banks and investors Actual NPL exposure data for SPVs and other intermediaries includes impact of write-offs; Coherently with doBank reporting and industry standards, NPL servicing market data does not include impact of write-offs of sales from banks to SPVs or other financial intermediaries

Italy Bad Loans strategy confirmed: profitable growth to continue

  1. Win servicing mandates to confirm leadership position in Italian NPL Special and Master Servicing 2. Increase collections and collections efficiency to extract maximum value from portfolio under management 3. Increase revenue per unit of GBV by leveraging on a complete suite of Ancillary services 1 2 3
Bad Loans growth pillars Strategic priorities 2018E-2020E Targets
1
Add GBV and Confirm leadership in Italian Bad Loans
Special and Master Servicing
2018E: total New GBV wins at €15-17bn
(€3-5bn on top of what announced with
1Q18 results)
Grow collections Selective approach to new mandates to
deploy operating leverage at best returns
2018E-2020E: €15bn new GBV wins
(Italian bad loans only)
2 Progressive improvement in:
Increase collection
efficiency
Internal efficiency and innovation levers to
support an organic improvement in
Collection Rate: above 2.6% by 2020E
(2.4% in FY 2017)
collection rates Collection/FTE: above €2.8m by 2020E
(€2.5m in FY 2017)
3
Complete service
Rollout of Ancillary services primarily
targeting captive clients, offering a one-stop
shop solution
Increase revenue per unit of GBV via
ancillary services
offering via
ancillaries
Specialized banking services to complete
product offer of core NPL services
Upside non included in Business Plan:
non-captive clients and growth via M&A

Italy UTP: significant exposure in need of proactive management

UTP exposures expected to become the next issue for banks' asset quality

  • Net Book Value exposure higher than bad loans
  • Significantly lower coverage ratio with higher impact in case of shift to NPL
  • IFRS 9 more sensitive to change of classification from performing to UTP

UTP composition mirrors that of bad loans

  • Highly skewed towards corporate loans
  • Highly concentrated among top Italian banks
  • Significant proportion of common exposures among banks
  • Need to improve current UTP management
  • 4 years after the beginning of the restructuring procedure, >62% of positions are still being restructured
  • 50% of UTP stock at the beginning of 2017 stayed UTP at YE 2017
    • 7% went back to performing
    • 16% moved to bad loans

2017YE Italian Banks' UTP gross size and coverage

Italy UTP: increased opportunity in the servicing market

  • The Regulator, in defining the Guidance to banks on NPLs, expects that Banks implement a proactive management to NPLs, much like Bad Loans management
    1. Portfolio segmentation
    1. Borrower's analysis
    1. Early warning system
    1. NPL operating model
  • Some UTP sales by banks executed in 2017, several processes currently ongoing (small and medium size portfolios)
  • Bid/ask spread still too wide for banks to engage in transactions of significant size, need to find structures which allow for proactive management by servicers and limited loss for banks
  • doBank already managing the largest UTP portfolio (ca. €2bn) as an independent servicer in Italy, currently strengthening its capabilities in corporate restructuring

Source: PWC report "Update on the Italian NPL servicing market (June 2018)"

Competitive dynamics in the Italian NPL Market

doBank enjoys the most diversified product offer and the largest scale among peers both in Special & Master Servicing

  1. PWC report "Update on the Italian NPL servicing market (June 2018)" - Intrum ISP data considering the ISP transaction of April – Cerved excludes Barclays performing loans – doBank GBV as of Q1 2018 33

Highest rating in the sector in Europe and solid reputation

  • Key servicer rating mainly driven by
  • Management
  • Organization (e.g. staff, operational structure)
  • Asset/loans administration (procedures, collection efforts and results)
  • Financial position
  • Best-in-class rating underpinned, among others, by:
  • "Best practices evidenced by superior performance metrics and vendor management controls" (Fitch)
  • "Highest ability, efficiency, and competence in managing large and highly diverse asset portfolios" (S&P)
  • Special Servicer Rating is a key variable for the assignment of credit ratings to NPLs securitization tranches by rating agencies

Highest Special Servicer Rating assigned by rating agencies compared to other players since 2008. Fitch confirmed Special Servicing Rating RSS1-/Css1- for the 9th year in a row and assigned Master Servicer rating of RMS2/CMS2/ABMS2 in July 2017

Greek market opportunity

  • NPL management is the biggest challenge of the Greek banking system due to the size of NPLs (€94.4bn as of YE 2017) and the impact it could have on the recovery of the real economy
  • Greece is an early stage market without a real servicing sector and with a new regulatory framework defined in 2016
  • All stakeholders understand that the creation of a servicing market for NPLs would allow the banks to manage or sell portfolios more efficiently

Greek NPL Landscape

New Legal resolution framework
Legal Reforms Judicial Reforms Servicing Player Establishment
New classification for Greek debtors

with less protective approach
Establishment of special chambers in

Peace Courts
New legal framework for experienced

NPL management companies to attain
New legal framework for bankruptcy
Pending cases categorization
resolution, offer investment
opportunities & ultimately instigate
recovery

Changes in the framework to improve
the efficiency of the Law

Communication and information
reforms
New auction process to sell properties
New legislation to expand the Asset

Registry to include deposits, GGBs,
mutual funds, overseas fixed /
moveable assets, etc.

Servicing Market

  • 1 central liquidator of all Bad Banks appointed in 2016 called PQH as JV between PWC, Qualco and Hoist, and is mandated by the BoG to liquidate €9bn of NPLs generated by 16 bad banks
  • More than 10 licensed NPL servicers in Greece, all licensed since summer 2017. None of them is allowed to provide loans for refinancing. The probably most advanced in the set-up are:
  • Cepal: 43% Alpha Bank and 57% other shareholders (incl. Centerbridge) which has already transferred €500m of residential mortgages to it for servicing and it's focalized on small unsecured
  • FPS (100% Eurobank) focused on Eurobank SBL and consumer loans

doBank is the only Bank servicer, managing all NPL, focusing on corporates and with the ability to finance restructuring transactions

Greek Branch Structure

  • doBank set-up its first foreign branch in 1Q18 through passporting of banking license
  • Branch operative since April with c.30 FTE by June 2018 specialized in both NPL liquidation and restructuring with Greek talent and additional Italian staff involved in the project
  • Simple structure with defined roles to ensure independence of specialists and a streamlined decision-making process
  • The platform will be responsible for all strategic, tactical and support activities across the NPL value chain and utilizes a network of real estate brokers and lawyers which replicate the Italian business model

Platform Organization, roles and responsibilities

doBank Hellas merges a very experienced Greek team with the support of doBank Group and its 20 years track record

doBank approach to SME common exposures in Greece

The Context Main benefits of the approach
The consolidation of the Greek banking

market naturally brought debtors to have
exposures to the four banks
This affects NPL management (bad loans and

UTP) mainly in two ways:

Very high cost to service exposures

Collateral asymmetry among the involved
parties, making resolutions, both restructuring
and liquidation, more difficult

The issue is particularly evident in SMEs,
which are many, for which the banking system
cannot rely on a sufficient number of asset
managers to carry on effective resolutions
Making un-cooperative borrowers

cooperate through coordinated legal
pressure

Avoiding individual action turning viable
clients into liquidation cases
Maximize value

High level delegation
and reducing
NPL

Reduction in cost due to access to a full
data set regarding the borrowers and
reduced duplication
Cost optimization through the

management of the loans as a syndicated
exposure
Recent updates
Develop additional capabilities across the
entire value chain thanks to doBank
Facilitate
sustainability

Optionality new funding to restructuring
doBank is currently in the final exclusive

negotiation stage with the four local systemic
of Greek SMEs
cases and flexibility of using different
financing instruments
banks for a €1.8 billion servicing mandate
(GBV)

From retaining the full legal and
Enable asset
economic ownership of the assets to
deconsolidation
target future asset deconsolidation

Greece Additional Potential Development

NPL Stock in the Greek Market 2Q17 -YE191

  • Portfolio sales estimated at ca. €12bn by 2019 (60% unsecured, 40% SME/Corporate secured), system needs collections beyond Greek banks current capabilities
  • doBank accredited with top European investors:
  • First established servicer for secured portfolios
  • Expected agreement with 4 systemic banks
  • More transactions likely with the 4 banks
  • doBank ambitions: grow platform beyond initial mandate and win mandates from Investors and Banks

Recent deals in the market

Buyer Seller Size Type
Intrum Eurobank €1.5bn Unsecured
B2Holding Alpha Bank €3.7bn Unsecured
Intrum/Carval NBG €5.1bn Unsecured
Bain Piraeus Bank €1.9bn Secured

Market Servicing pipeline

Portfolio sale pipeline – 2018 only

  • Piraeus Bank: €2bn corporate secured +€2bn unsecured
  • National Bank of Greece: >€2.5bn unsecured portfolio
  • Alpha Bank: €1bn secured portfolio
  • National Bank of Greece: €0.6bn secured portfolio

The NPL factory

Carlo Vernuccio – Head of NPL management Andrea Giovanelli – Head of UTP and Banking

Expanding across the value chain

doBank has decided to grow value by exploiting its NPL skills in contiguous products (UTP & Banking) and markets (Greece and potentially others)

doBank positioning in high value activities as a pure servicer

NPL ownership Advisory and strategy Credit collection Purchase of credit portfolios or securitizations Master servicing Due diligence Real estate advisory Collection enforcement Co-Investors Valuation advisors Debt purchasers RE advisors Master servicers Debt collections agencies NPL Servicers PE funds NPL management is a non core activity for banks & corporates doBank is a unique player that can cover all credit management phases doBank is not a debt purchaser but has a capital light business Co-investment is instrumental to obtain servicing contracts doBank is not a Debt collection agency (DCA) but an NPL servicer NPL servicers are focused on elaborating and executing individual collection strategies with a high level of specialization model, integrating different activities as real estate management, commercial information and legal activities DCAs are focused on massive collection through phone and home collectors, with significant involvement of FTEs and low margins Phases of NPL Management Players of NPL Management Extrajudicial Judicial Large tickets Small tickets Secured Unsecured Single agreements Extra-judicial foreclosure Foreclosure procedures Bankruptcies Repossession Asset repossession Massive standardized Homephone collection Distrains on salaries, wages or bank accounts NPL servicers DCAs High value added activities

Focus on NPL: Product and Services offering

Product /
Service
Description Company Revenue Driver
1
Credit
management

Includes three main activities: (i) credit management, focused on
judicial / extrajudicial credit recovery, (ii) management & disposal
(e.g. REOCO)
of assets used as guarantees for NPLs or expired leasing
contracts, (iii) administrative activities to support recovery processes

Base fee: tied to
GBV

Collection fee:
tied to yearly
collections
2
Master
Servicing &
securitization

Includes all administrative activities aimed at coordinating special
servicer(s) underlying securitization projects

Structuring of the securitization includes SPV incorporation, loan
transfer, technical characteristics of the issuance, rating process
and securities distribution

Italfondiario
operates as "soggetto
incaricato" (entity responsible for the
securitization) according to law 130/1999 (securitization law)

Fee-for-service
3
Due diligence
Support in acquisition / disposal processes of loan portfolios to identify

potential risk factors
that affect loan collection, valuation and, if
requested, dialogue with rating agencies

Fee-for-service
4
Co
investment

Co-investment activities are functional to obtaining the servicing
contract
related to the loan portfolio underlying the securitization
transaction
Interest income

on securitization
notes

Loan lifecycle – Management Workflow 1

  • To develop customer segmentation and assign debtor cases to recovery strategies, doBank carries out a broad set of activities, from due diligence of the loan portfolio to the implementation of management actions
  • Based on valuation of the portfolio and management strategies to be adopted, the asset manager defines the recovery cash flow expected in terms of time and amount to be recovered (Business Plan of the Portfolio)

Strong capability to on-board loans, clustering as a key factor 1

Strategy definition is pivotal phase for successful management 1

Settlement and closing 1

Improvements in recovery performance 1

doBank as independent servicer has proven track record in improving collections after taking over servicing of NPL portfolios from commercial banks and investors

Actual Net Cash Flow

Reporting 1

  • In order to support the asset management team, doBank developed specific reporting for asset managers used in daily activities
  • The new reporting is based on the following criteria:
  • Synthesis: in just 3 pages the AM can monitors his portfolio having a clear view of collections performance, current legal stages, business plan status and next fixed real estate auctions
  • Variance over time: all the tracked variance are compared to previous week and beginning of the year
  • Deeper analysis: each single figure included in the reporting can be detailed at asset level
NPL AM Cruscotto
Periodo - Anno 2014
Investors Business, GL Vernuccio Claudio , Team Bottero - NPL Roma 3 , AM Pacchiarotti Flavio
1/3 - Performance RECEIVED A 447 MALMAGNET REP
Ad esclusivo uso interno
Teum doll agglomati a 03/03/14
In Progress In Progress In Progress
P1 (Gen-Apr) P2 (Mag-Age) P3 (Set-Dic) Totale Anno (Gen-Dic)
Target Originatio 5 974 795 6.256.007 8.202.656 20561210
Ternet 5 974 765 6.256.867 8.282.656
Increased (IT) 2811563 $\theta$ $\alpha$ 2813503
% Tanaet 44% ON. O% 13%
Одиниза 3,361,212 6,256,162 8.282,656 17,000.235
vs. settmana procedente (incassi) 102.002 $\circ$ $\circ$ 102.002
Asset Manager contribution
Ja Progress In Progress In Progress
P1 (Gen-Apr) P2 (Mag-Age) P3 (Set-Dic) Totale Anno (Gan-Dic)
Contabilizzato (con case)
CAS
318.017 ٠ $\circ$ 316.017
Courtstate 101.031 ٥ ٥ 109.153
Strapputtziale 146,824 t ö 146,824
Brass Bighthand $\circ$ ó $\circ$
Brans Boons ۵ ٠ ۵ ٥
Contabilizzato (privo di Case)
da.
$\circ$ $\sigma$ $\circ$ $\circ$
Non contabilizzati (degnaiati)
(c)
$\bullet$ $\sigma$ $\circ$ $\circ$
Incassi Totali
$(40 - 10)$ by $(2)$
316.017 $\sigma$ ٠ 316.017
Ni su Incassi total del Team 12% ON. ON- 12%
vs. settimana precedente (incassi) 758 $\circ$ ٥ 750
Asset Manager Bonus KYA $\theta$ ۰ KV
(0.20%)
Incorps
632 $\circ$ ۰ 632
C.
KF1
cosa
$\bullet$ $\theta$ ö $\alpha$

Page 1: Performance Page 2: Stratifications Page 3: BP & Auctions

2/3 - Portfolio
Periodo - Anno 2014 Ad esclusivo uso interno
Investors Business, GL Vernuccio Claudio , Team Bottero - NPL Roma 3 , AM Pacchiarotti Flavio dot conformati a 03/03/14
Peritoio
Mesi dalla oessione New IN
olim. 6n.12m 12m 24m 24m Technic YT0 P1 (Cen Apr) P2 (Mag Apr) P3 (Set Die) YTD %
of Total
YID
Closed
٠ $\circ$ 2.7 7.5 16 8. ø $\circ$ × ON.
Classroo Full DHI ò ۵ 422.283 2.333.500 3795172 ٠ $\circ$ ï ON
NDV $\alpha$ ۵ 15.540 238,609 254,148 ö ï ON
× $\circ$ z. 6.5 $\overline{2}$ $\Omega$ × ċ ċ ON.
Closing Partia so. $\circ$ 220.754 4400.127 9.000.938 13,417,770 r. × c ¢ CN
SIDV $\circ$ 00.994 11,337 00,445 159,745 ċ ċ CN
٠ 4.7 60.7 271.2 22 348 ٨ k m
NPLAM 607 421.723 11.078.934 1001-001-2333 1144,503 199,844,354 431.799 424,225 ٨ é ON
N D V 141817 BAR KNN 6.268.333 90,632 7.849.4% \$41,817 \$45,817 ۵ ï ON
٠ 4 2 ME 2 284 . 41 385 ٠ ٠ c k 98 $\bullet$
Totalis ond 421.723 11.300.688 101.114.143 12.884.081 216.020.536 421723 421,722 ۰ r ON
Mode 101.437 203,5690 673,631 314, 200 1403 (842) 105,431 105,435 c r 19%
NRY 141.917 000.649 6706.170 415,685 8,262,338 541,617 141111 c r O%
Security
Stato procedura legale COL 10% cos 92% IDON 100%
CAL 10% 20%
Nessuna Assemblance
Legale
Aziena
accusta
Reform CTU (
Arrente BK
CBU Det
Am Pows RK
Asto Distribution Chinaka i
Residual
Closing Totale Audicial
Incles
٠ 3i $\alpha$ 48 12.7 11.7 78.0 G.D 14.7 23. 148 77%
11 Grado oers 15.302.170 $\mathbf{u}$ 4/5.457 5.965.321 4,905,991 22.991.943 8.540.632 15.305.659 12.100.661 05.857.030 69%
٠ $\mathbf{E}$ $\theta$ e 45 3 2 12.7 9.0 3.0 31 26 77%
$2n$ Grado cov 450.720 $\alpha$ e 24.267 30.628 4.985,983 1.306,663 5.003.248 AB DSS 13,384,411 85%
٠ $20 -$ 30. 17.2 55. 13. 30 2 75 HO. 11. 212 52%
Unsecured m 8815235 4.378.765 6.007.675 4.435.855 8.426.938 6,695,704 33.099.217 38,020,275 3.505.435 116,703,095 25%
Totals ٠ 39 30 жś $\mathbf{a}$ $\overline{\mathbf{v}}$ 118.2 м. $\overline{n}$ 37 385 65%
on/ 34,580,120 4.178.765 6.483.131 10.415.444 13,780,434 32.042.057 42,896,532 58.376.183 16.174.142 216.020.536 23%
٠ ¢. 1.5 17.5 54. 15. 13.7 g P 82. zo. 161
of which UK: cov 14.008.515 $\mathbf{u}$ 6.007.679 0.955.364 9.065.073 14.524.133 41,669,470 58.779.305 12.492.374 164,392,814
Leursanne ٠ 2.7 f. 75 2.5 $\overline{1}$ ø ô 62. 15 $22 -$
non dissoriale OHV 502.239 ö 1,398,865 1006.001 2,443,070 × $\theta$ 08.729.368 88,050 61.449.058
Arrmitatione n a $\overline{2}$ 5. z. 16.0 35 × $\alpha$ 22.
ELONGNON 641 ø ö 101.055 6.885.038 4,854,096 44-455-500 8 923 849 ö a 20.049.726
Imparta $\alpha$ ö 165291 3 843 656 574,354 8.373.398 4.423.235 $\alpha$ 14.259.006
Arringstone ٠ $\overline{2}$ ó $\mathbb{R}$ $\overline{L}$ $\mathbf{a}$ $3.0^{+1}$ ő. a a. 33 1
in chicagalo 680 \$4,334,277 n 4.419.359 2.014.877 5 608 748 3.368.598 32.744.854 n 12.404.319 74,085,030
HERAKA 843,526 ò 2.238.634 1.762.359 3 679 824 2.382.766 16.216.986 $\theta$ 5.124.521 12.219.021
ON OK. -5% 4% 86 os. -7% 74 $-7%$ -9%
Tel. ys. set.
organizate
s.
North A
OW O% -9% 1% CG -1% $-196$ 2% -1% D%
Tot vs. Intdo $\mathbf{X}$ m D% ON- crs. DA O% CN 3 ON. m. D%
Periodo - Anno 2014 3/3 - Performance Ad esclusivo uso interno
Investors Business, GL Vernuccio Claudio , Team Bottero - NPL Roma 3 , AM Pacchiarotti Flavio
Husiness Plan dat aggromat a G3CG14
Mesi dalla ocstione
kdes fm 12m 120-240 24m * Totale Tot yx sett
procedents
DP Index RP cco.
delinguagev
RP con incassi
nell'anno
EP < Y2011 ٠ ٥ 20. 103.1 14. 137. O% 76 37.7 2P
٤ ctu ö 4.129.010 49.841.996 2.793.571 58,784,575 C% S% 24:345.000 1,309,608
BP Y2011
٤
٠ ö R 2 10 o $2\overline{z}$ 21.7 2% 4% A.D $20^{\circ}$
GRS ö 296,656 8,549,426 30265 9.576.347 ON. 2% 605 651 3-802-943
RP Y2012
٤
٠
AR-
ö 6. 40. $\mathbf{A}$ 61.3 0% 11% W.P 12
٠ ö
ö
1,791,983 21211.553 R.JON 988 31.430.525 0%
gs.
12% 2979.847
10
262.051
1.0
٤
EP 12013
oth ۵ 8.
1.205.817
20
37,683,697
$\mathbf{1}$
82732
29.2
39.052.045
g% 8%
19%
1260.241 88.055
٠ 45 65 44.7 1.5 SS. ow. O% ۰ ٥
DP 12014 one 421.723 1.417.734 63,526,477 133,796 65.400.730 O% O% ۰ $\Omega$
٠ ô Δ. 59 15 AS. O% O% ۰ ٥
I None GP ö 1,957,879 10:501.804 1,417,629 13,887,312 O% os. $\circ$ $\overline{a}$
٠ 4. 56. 28.4.1 41. 385.2 -0% 24 04 60.0 6.P
Totale opy 421.723 11.399.688 991.354.543 12.884.981 216.020.536 -0% 30% 29.270.819 5.121.958
Garanta
VTD 1º quido Altro quado Non Garantito 2ª srado Totale Tot, vs. sett.
procedente
Auction
Facilitation
% Auction
Facilitation
Intertio in
diardo
٠ aca. 90.0 300 / 119,2 ars. 5% $\alpha$ C% 270
Cost Arts 30.031.823 12:208.044 30:282.728 15 (CO) 706 89 139 102 1% 7.091.109 $0\%$ 39.962.929
Deserta
No esito
٠ 3i $\alpha$ 7,0 $25 -$ $\mathbf{r}$ -29% 17% $\ddot{\phantom{a}}$
Racinalis 120,000 $\alpha$ Silvi croz 296,555 1.010.042 20195 967414 17% $\alpha$
Postcassis $\bullet$ 9 o ö 10 ö n ON. ١ 10% $\overline{1}$
Roce artist
$\overline{\phantom{a}}$
1.084.998 $\alpha$ $\mathbf{r}$ ۰ 1.084.958 OK. 178,000 10% 178,000
43. $H_{\nu}$ 463 s. 108.2 4% 50 9% 28.
ـ
Cresbutos Committee
٠
3.615.970 3,078,455
$\alpha$
5.148.283
$\mathbf{r}$
2343.100
۰
14.084.907 2%
$-100%$
1.052.475
۰
7%
ON
2,492,057
Sold Reoco Back and Đ
125,000
$\Omega$ $\mathbf{r}$ $\circ$ $\mathbf{1}$
125,000
$-100%$ $\circ$ ON o
$\bullet$
٠ 17.1 ۰ 10 1 ٥ $33 -$ 120% 90 30% $25^{\circ}$
Cose arts 1311900 $\theta$ 4,005,910 ó 8.157.010 $-100%$ 1.022.014 17%
$\mathbf{r}$ 75 8.0 8.0 ö $\sigma$ 3% é 35% $\alpha$
Richards
٠
398 823 231,650 50.674 ö 683.347 4% 384 120 58%
ある
349,934
$\circ$
۰
75
381,090
٥
۰
$12 -$
731,014
6%
-21%
ĸ
417,000
42%
57%
$\circ$
Macro
Acritic
Maggare
Cose anto
٠
34 $\circ$ ø ۰ 3 o CW и 22% $\circ$
Gugna Cost and 762,059 n $\mathbf{r}$ ö 762.059 OY. 600,000 79%

2 Master Servicing and structuring of securitizations

  • Master servicer performs different activities in a securitization, both regulated and ancillary
  • doBank provides services to the investors from the structuring of the securitization to the SPV management
Loan Administration Accounting and
Cash Management
Portfolio and/or
Investor Reporting
Servicer Oversight
Automated analysis,

such as performance
metrics or dashboards
Timely exception

reporting regime to
identify errors,
omissions and actions
outside of delegation
authorities
Cash collection and

payments processing
Control of the custodial

accounts, bank
reconciliations
Escrow accounts or

reserve accounts
Control over adjustments

to mortgage loan
Accurate and timely

reporting to trustees,
investors and from
special to master servicer
Remitting funds to clients
Review of info from

Special Servicer(s)
Authorization

procedures
Ongoing review of

Special Servicers
capabilities and
performance

Securitizations

  • Long experience in origination and underwriting securitizations of performing and non performing portfolios
  • Since 2000, Italfondiario has structured more than 50 securitizations to date (#1 ranked in Italy)
  • The Group can support the originator in all phases of the process

Due Diligence capability 3

  • Due diligence scope is to define the valuation of a portfolio through the analysis of available documentation
  • Based on valuation and management strategies applied, the asset manager determines the recovery cash flow expectations in terms of time and volumes (Business Plan)
  • doBank provides its assistance to:
  • Client with servicing contracts in this case doBank organizes the dataroom and Q&A and assists client in sale
  • Investors / banks for buy side in this case doBank gives support in credit valuation
  • doBank has proven the capability to manage due diligences with a pronounced number of loans and great complexity as demonstrated in the MPS and FINO due diligence (more than €40bn analysed)

Co-Investment 4

  • Co-investments instrumental to win new servicing mandates and subject to the Group being servicer of overall NPLs portfolio and leading underwriting due diligence
  • Co-investment strategy focuses on investing across the capital structure, however investment only in mezzanine and junior tranches can be considered under certain conditions
  • Minority co-investments alongside main investors in NPLs securitization structures

doBank ancillary services

doBank ancillary services: focus on doData offering

  • Extensive expertise in managing large sets of complex data enables the creation of data quality products
  • doData offers a complete solution to improve NPL specific data sets at banks, with a focus on the real estate component
  • As a result, banks benefit from improved ability to collect and better data governance
  • First contract signed with Unicredit in 1Q2018 and a second in the pipeline for 2018

Features of the UTP market and doBank's core capabilities

GBV already
under
management
€1.8bn from UniCredit UTP (residential

mortgage)
Top class
team

Dedicated team already operative both
in front and back office activities
UTP Market Features doBank track record and capabilities
Corporate
exposure

>70% of UTP portfolio
70%
of
its

Core
asset

successful
NPL
portfolio
is
corporate
class
of
the
Group,
long-standing
track
record
of
management
Highly
Secured
>75% of UTP portfolio

80%
of
NPL

Deep
estate
assets
portfolio
either
secured
or
soft-secured
understanding
and
valuation
capabilities
of
Italian
real
Mid-market
size of
position

~50% of positions range between €1m
and €15m
Strong

capability
to
preparation
for
the
mid-market
size
thanks
to
the
great
manage
large
number
of
positions
Client
concentration

53% of total GBV with top three Italian
banks

Ability
to
leverage
on
current
client
relationships
doBank
Expertise and
Interest
Alignment

Corporates: benefits from management expertise and
professional new finance

Client banks: deconsolidation of loans keeping strong
exposure to upside
doBank fee structure: different fee structure from NPL

servicing with strong alignment of parties both in credit
Bring
borrower
doBank
back to
Objective
performing
management and new finance

Rationale of doBank proposal for UTP

Objective

  • Enhance credit management efficiency through a best in class team, with a thorough understanding of main industries and adequate incentive schemes
  • Focus actions on SMEs with business rationales, jeopardized by financial burdens and impacted by banking de-risking mood
  • Capital light model to fulfill new finance needs of borrowers: partnerships with external Investors, coupling their liquidity and risk appetite, with banking capabilities of doBank
  • Deal structures allowing Banks to derecognize NPLs without crystalizing losses, thus keeping a strong exposure to value creation
  • Banking and IT solutions allowing a comprehensive solution to any banking instrument

Success Key

  • The success keys of this Servicing structure are:
  • Speeding up of financial restructuring process
  • Ensure the right time, amount and instrument for the New Finance
  • Facilitate all suitable changes of governance and management in borrowers

Outcome

To improve corporate turnaround leading to an increase in Banks future recovery performances, with a strong alignment of economic interests among different parties involved

doBank UTP operating model

  • doBank is structured in order to carry out two different, but interconnected core activities: Servicing and Financing activities
  • A Back-office Team will support both the Restructuring and Financing Team

doBank role in the UTP management process

  • doBank, already the largest independent servicer of UTP in Italy, will offer restructuring expertise and its active portfolio management process, for an attractive fee structure
  • When appropriate, doBank will be able to offer co-financing along other investors, supporting the Business Plan of the borrower

Business model for the new Bank

  • Other than UTP management, follow up of existing banking activities along same clear principles:
  • Sustain the existing fee business of doBank, providing a further competitive advantage
  • Provided that there is a privileged insight and understanding of creditworthiness and great experience in NPLs/UTPs

Key financials – Execution of IPO plan

  • A resilient business, able to grow revenues and expand margins
  • Internal levers enabling quality top-line growth and progressively higher profitability and cash flows

Growth drivers

  • Add GBV by winning mandates
  • Protect premium pricing
  • Improve collection efficiency
  • Add more revenues per unit of GBV via ancillaries

Growth drivers

  • Deployment of operating leverage
  • Process-driven efficiency improvement
  • Strict control of SG&A and Real Estate costs

Growth drivers

  • Structurally low-capex needs
  • High operational cash flow conversion

GBV dynamics

  • GBV trend is a pivotal driver for loan servicers, impacted by several factors
  • A loan servicer is "good for all seasons"
  • In a positive macro cycle, the GBV will reduce faster owing to more collections and lower new flows
  • On the opposite, inflows will increase in a negative macro cycle

GBV Evolution and key assumptions

Conservative planning assumptions underlying key variables of GBV evolution in 2018-2020

Portfolio features support growing profitability with low risk

Key features of doBank portfolio

Implications for doBank

Lower risk profile vs debt purchasers:

    1. Servicing third-party portfolios via long-term contracts ensures low volatility and high predictability of cash flows
    1. Lower risks involved: no balance sheet risk, no pricing risk, no sensitivity to interest rates, low execution risk
    1. Balanced client mix and independence reduce client risk
  • 4. Co-investment captures upside on value of portfolio managed on top of fee structure

Higher profitability of the servicing business:

    1. Value-added services, with higher barriers to entry represented by data, protecting pricing
    1. Complex asset management activity requiring specialized skills
    1. Possibility to add more revenues per unit of GBV via legal, real estate and other ancillary services
    1. Ability to scale up due to low labor intensity of operations and leveraging on technology

Portfolio mix drives strong cash flow generation and low execution risk

  1. 2016: UniCredit 47%, Fortress 33%, Intesa Sanpaolo 11% - 2017: Fortress 32%, Unicredit 20%, Fino 20%

Collection rate dynamics

  • Large, corporate, secured assets tend to have long recovery curves in need of proactive asset management
  • Collection amounts linked to collection costs, ensuring high profitability at each stage of the process
  • doBank's improvement in collection rates based on internal levers such as new flows vintage and collections efficiency
New Flows Improved average portfolio vintage drives collection rate growth
Collection
rate
drivers
Collection
efficiency

Collect more on the same unit of GBV, collect at lower cost due to technology and process
improvements
Macro
factors

External factors not included in doBank's
planning assumptions: improving macro that
positively affects collections via asset prices and higher borrowers wealth

Ability to collect profitably throughout the loan lifetime

Tiered fee structure aligns interests of clients and doBank

  • Performance-based and recurring revenues provide downside protection and upside potential to doBank
  • Client and portfolio mix are key to protect pricing power and stay focused on most profitable sub-segments

Revenue drivers of new business

  • doBank is focused on developing growth in contiguous markets both by product and by country
  • Current expertise in Italian NPL and UTP is fundamental in the development of the new activities

Building from core competences to selectively add new revenue streams

Group Revenue outlook in 2018-2020

Consolidated Revenue Targets

  • Gross Revenues >€230m driven by
  • Significant new GBV under management (+€3-5bn in 2Q-4Q18, +€15-17bn in 2018FY)
  • Improved collection efficiency
  • Ancillary revenues expansion
  • €2bn out of Intesa managed portfolio potentially included in Intrum perimeter (indemnity protection or continue servicing)

2018E 2017A-2020E

  • Gross Revenues 8%-9% CAGR in 2017A-2020E
  • New GBV wins of €15bn over the plan post 1Q18 (Italy bad loans)
  • Ramp up of new growth initiatives such as UTP and Greece
  • Higher collections efficiency
  • Ancillary revenues supporting a one-stop-shop offer

M&A upside not included

2017A 2018E 2020E Specialized banking upside not included (costs already included)

Strict cost control to support profitability growth

Growing revenues while keeping cost base under control Reallocation of resources to highest growth potential business

Deployment of New Group structure: financial impacts

Lever Description of initiative Nature of impact
Operating cost Reductions of SG&A and HR costs
Yearly recurring
savings
Upfront redundancies costs related to ca. 7% FTE reduction
One-Off
Tax
efficiencies
Cost of DTA reassessment in


More efficient applicable tax regime,
year of status change of
decreasing tax rate from 33%
c.€11m gross
(applied to the Bank) to 28%
(applied to the Servicer)
One-off non cash
and
compensation

Payback period to recover the initial

Future tax efficiencies
DTA re-assessment: 3 –
4 years
Yearly recurring
Cash from FY 2020
ICT
Capex for project setup in
2018
The setup of the new Bank will

require dedicated investments (i.e
One-off
investments core banking, marketing, reporting
and monitoring tools)
IT running costs
Yearly recurring
Project costs
Consulting costs arising for setting up of new Bank and Group re
organization in 2018

Start-up cost for UTP, Greek and new Bank of c.€3m
One-off
Certain one-off costs in 2018 and potentially 2019 to re-organize Group Structure

with future ongoing savings

M&A and capital deployment guidelines

  • New organizational structure provides doBank with significant firepower for M&A
  • Use leverage up to ~3x net debt/EBITDA
  • Priority in use of capital is deployment to capture new sources of growth in same/contiguous markets
  • Alternative use of excess cash to progressively increase shareholder remuneration
  • Stringent screening criteria with a selective approach to accretive opportunities

Growth via M&A not included in 2018-2020 business plan assumptions and targets

Group 2018-2020E guidance


Commitment to high levels of operating cash flow conversion (>90% in 19-20E) despite higher
Capex program of €14m in 2018 reducing to €5m in 2020
Cash
generation
and M&A

Invest to be able to "do more with less"

Industry-leading dividend payout at >65% of consolidated ordinary net income

New organizational structure enables use of balance sheet strength for M&A, not included in
current planning assumptions

Significant medium term growth in revenues with expanding margins and more than proportional impact on ordinary EPS

Key strategic pillars of doBank business plan

Condensed consolidated income statement

(€/000)

Condensed consolidated income statement Year Change First Quarter Change
2017 2016 PF Amount % 2018 2017 Amount
Serv icing rev enues 196,554 191,754 4,800 3% 41,947 41,721 226
o/w Banks 159,763 169,305 (9,542) (6)% 27,053 38,454 (11,401)
o/w Investors 36,791 22,449 14,342 64% 14,894 3,267 11,627
Co-inv estment rev enues 665 25 640 n.s. 236 - 236
Ancillary and other rev enues 15,796 14,402 1,394 10% 4,069 3,486 583
Gross Revenues 213,015 206,181 6,834 3% 46,252 45,207 1,045
Outsourcing fees (18,087) (17,767) (320) 2% (3,684) (4,191) 507
Net revenues 194,928 188,414 6,514 3% 42,568 41,016 1,552
Staff expenses (83,391) (81,570) (1,821) 2% (22,496) (19,436) (3,060)
Administrativ e expenses (41,435) (42,537) 1,102 (3)% (9,071) (11,719) 2,648
o/w IT (17,784) (14,253) (3,531) 25% (3,343) (6,905) 3,562
o/w Real Estate (8,086) (9,114) 1,028 (11)% (1,925) (1,967) 42
o/w SG&A (15,565) (19,170) 3,605 (19)% (3,803) (2,847) (956)
Operating expenses (124,826) (124,107) (719) 1% (31,567) (31,155) (412)
EBITDA 70,102 64,307 5,795 9% 11,001 9,861 1,140
EBITDA Margin 33% 31% 2% 6% 24% 22% 2%
Impairment/Write-backs on PP&E and intangible assets (2,284) (1,720) (564) 33% (559) (506) (53)
Net Prov isions for risks and charges (4,041) 1,538 (5,579) n.s. (211) (135) (76)
Net Write-downs of loans 1,776 114 1,662 n.s. 8 70 (62)
Net income (losses) from inv estments 2,765 179 2,586 n.s. 340 - 340
EBIT 68,318 64,418 3,900 6% 10,579 9,290 1,289
Net financial interest and commission (184) (196) 12 (6)% (46) (46) -
EBT 68,134 64,222 3,912 6% 10,533 9,244 1,289
Income tax for the period (22,750) (23,550) 800 (3)% (3,960) (3,572) (388)
Profit (loss) from group of assets sold and held for sale net of tax (390) (1,435) 1,045 (73)% - (341) 341
Net Profit (Loss) for the period 44,994 39,237 5,757 15% 6,573 5,331 1,242
Minorities - - - n.s. - - -
Net Profit (Loss) attributable to the Group before PPA 44,994 39,237 5,757 15% 6,573 5,331 1,242
Economic effects of "Purchase Price Allocation" - 1,157 (1,157) (100)% - - -
Goodwill impairment - - - n.s. - - -
Net Profit (Loss) attributable to the Group 44,994 40,394 4,600 11% 6,573 5,331 1,242
Earnings per share 0.58 0.52 0.06 11% 0.08 0.07 0.02

Consolidated balance sheet

(€/000)
Main
consolidated
balance
sheet
items
3/31/2018 12/31/2017
Financial
assets
83,965 76,303
fair
profit
at
v alue
through
or loss
22,853 22,998
at
fair
v alue
through
comprehensiv
e income
1,002 1,003
at
amortised
cost
- loans
and
receiv
ables
with
banks
55,645 49,449
at
amortised
cost
- loans
and
receiv
ables
with
customers
4,465 2,853
Tax
assets
92,791 94,187
Other
assets
124,631 127,010
Total
assets
301,387 297,500
Financial
liabilities
8,531 12,106
at
amortised
cost
- due
to
customers
8,531 12,106
prov ision
for
risks
E.T.B.
and
and
charges
38,221 36,939
Other
liabilities
70,740 41,758
Shareholders'
equity
183,895 206,697
Total
liabilities
and
shareholders'
equity
301,387 297,500

Consolidated cash flow

(€/000)

Cash
Flow
31/03/2018 31/03/2017
EBITDA 11,001 9,861
Net
Capex
(439) (722)
EBITDA-Capex 10,562 9,139
as %
of
EBITDA
96% 93%
Adjustment
for
accrual
on share-based
incentiv
e system
payments
1,607 -
in
Changes
NWC
(4,162) (13,786)
Changes
in
other
assets/liabilities
1,842 3,466
Operating
Cash
Flow
9,849 (1,181)
Financial
interests
paid/collected
(46) (46)
Free
Cash
Flow
9,803 (1,227)
(Inv
estments)/div
in
financial
estments
assets
(73) (751)
Net
Cash
Flow
of
the
period
9,730 (1,978)
financial
Position
- Beginning
of
period
Net
38,605 29,459
Net
financial
Position
- End
of
period
48,335 27,481
Change
in
Net
Financial
Position
9,730 (1,978)

Key Performance Indicators

(€/000)

performance
indicators
Key
3/31/2018 3/31/2017 12/31/2017 12/31/2016
PF
Gross
Book
Value
(Eop)
- in
millions
of
Euro
-
87,523 82,496 76,703 80,901
Collections
for
the
period
- in
millions
of
Euro
-
374 394 1,836 1,694
Collections
for
(LTM)
- in
millions
of
the
Last
Twelv
e Months
Euro
-
1,817 1,899 1,836 1,694
Collections/GBV
(EoP)
LTM
2.1% 2.3% 2.4% 2.1%
Collections
Stock/GBV
Stock
(EoP)
LTM
2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.1%
Staff
FTE/Total
FTE
37% 33% 37% 34%
LTM
Collections/Serv
icing
FTE
2,523 2,414 2,510 2,166
Cost/Income
ratio
74% 76% 64% 66%
EBITDA 11,001 9,861 70,102 64,307
EBT 10,533 9,244 68,134 64,222
Margin
EBITDA
24% 22% 33% 31%
Margin
EBT
23% 20% 32% 31%
ROE 3% 3% 22% 22%
EBITDA
– Capex
10,562 9,139 64,436 62,645
Net
Working
Capital
82,427 93,106 78,265 79,320
Financial
Position
of
cash/(debt)
Net
48,335 27,481 38,605 29,459

Disclaimer

This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements that reflect the doBank S.p.A.'s ("doBank" and/or the "Company") management's current views with respect to future events and financial and operational performance of the Company and its subsidiaries

These forward-looking statements are based on doBank's current expectations and projections about future events. Because these forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual future results or performance may differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these statements due to any number of different factors, many of which are beyond the ability of doBank to control or estimate precisely, including changes in the regulatory environment, future market developments, fluctuations in the price and other risks. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained herein, which are made only as of the date of this presentation

doBank does not undertake any obligation to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation. The information contained in this presentation does not purport to be comprehensive and has not been independently verified by any independent third party

This presentation does not constitute a recommendation regarding the securities of the Company. This presentation does not contain an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities issued by doBank

This Presentation is confidential and is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use is contrary to law, rule or regulation

Investor relation contacts: Investor relations contacts

Fabio Ruffini Head of Investor Relations

Tel.: +39 06 – 4797 9154 Mail: [email protected]

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.