Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

DILLARD'S, INC. Interim / Quarterly Report 2011

Dec 6, 2011

30624_10-q_2011-12-06_a3d51d23-dff0-49d4-b18c-d8a39f19edd4.zip

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

10-Q 1 a11-29553_110q.htm QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(D)

Table of Contents

*UNITED STATES*

*SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION*

*Washington, D.C. 20549*

*FORM 10-Q*

*(Mark One)*

*x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934*

*For the quarterly period ended October 29, 2011*

*or*

*o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934*

*For the transition period from to .*

*Commission File Number: 1-6140*

*DILLARD’S, INC.*

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE 71-0388071
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

*1600 CANTRELL ROAD, LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201*

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

*(501) 376-5200*

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

CLASS A COMMON STOCK as of November 26, 2011 46,217,724
CLASS B COMMON STOCK as of November 26, 2011 4,010,929

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='',FILE='C:\JMS\106750\11-29553-1\task4995409\29553-1-ba.htm',USER='106750',CD='Dec 5 05:49 2011'

Table of Contents

*Index*

*DILLARD’S, INC.*

Page Number
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited):
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 29, 2011, January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings for the Three and Nine Months Ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 15
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 28
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 29
Item 1A. Risk Factors 29
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 29
Item 6. Exhibits 30
SIGNATURES 30

2

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='2',FILE='C:\JMS\106750\11-29553-1\task4995409\29553-1-ba.htm',USER='106750',CD='Dec 5 05:49 2011'

Table of Contents

*PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION*

*Item 1. Financial Statements*

*DILLARD’S, INC.*

*CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS*

*(Unaudited)*

*(In Thousands)*

October 29, — 2011 January 29, — 2011 October 30, — 2010
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 106,383 $ 343,291 $ 167,119
Restricted cash 24,901 — —
Accounts receivable 20,262 25,950 51,421
Merchandise inventories 1,756,526 1,290,147 1,708,504
Other current assets 63,069 42,538 66,065
Total current assets 1,971,141 1,701,926 1,993,109
Property and equipment, net 2,476,363 2,595,514 2,649,718
Other assets 269,626 76,726 69,264
Total assets $ 4,717,130 $ 4,374,166 $ 4,712,091
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 1,028,555 $ 689,281 $ 1,049,231
Current portion of long-term debt 57,219 49,166 49,145
Current portion of capital lease obligations 2,279 2,184 2,153
Other short-term borrowings 142,000 — —
Federal and state income taxes including current deferred taxes 68,996 90,581 29,791
Total current liabilities 1,299,049 831,212 1,130,320
Long-term debt 634,812 697,246 697,704
Capital lease obligations 9,723 11,383 11,921
Other liabilities 206,534 205,916 211,247
Deferred income taxes 333,055 341,689 344,334
Subordinated debentures 200,000 200,000 200,000
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock 1,225 1,217 1,211
Additional paid-in capital 828,796 805,422 785,411
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (16,597 ) (17,830 ) (20,870 )
Retained earnings 2,968,076 2,653,437 2,546,338
Less treasury stock, at cost (1,747,543 ) (1,355,526 ) (1,195,525 )
Total stockholders’ equity 2,033,957 2,086,720 2,116,565
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,717,130 $ 4,374,166 $ 4,712,091

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='3',FILE='C:\JMS\106750\11-29553-1\task4995409\29553-1-ba.htm',USER='106750',CD='Dec 5 05:49 2011'

Table of Contents

*DILLARD’S, INC.*

*CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS*

*(Unaudited)*

*(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)*

Three Months Ended — October 29, October 30, Nine Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
Net sales $ 1,382,612 $ 1,344,118 $ 4,293,557 $ 4,186,624
Service charges and other income 33,926 28,919 96,790 89,864
1,416,538 1,373,037 4,390,347 4,276,488
Cost of sales 879,997 857,474 2,741,282 2,702,171
Advertising, selling, administrative and general expenses 404,766 398,494 1,190,070 1,184,190
Depreciation and amortization 64,734 64,953 192,862 193,124
Rentals 11,229 11,641 34,798 36,598
Interest and debt expense, net 17,750 18,043 54,447 55,361
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets (1,456 ) 934 (3,847 ) (3,292 )
Asset impairment and store closing charges — — 1,200 2,208
Income before income taxes and income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 39,518 21,498 179,535 106,128
Income taxes (benefit) (188,360 ) 6,035 (138,640 ) 33,075
Income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 293 (1,082 ) 4,238 (3,010 )
Net income 228,171 14,381 322,413 70,043
Retained earnings at beginning of period 2,742,624 2,534,594 2,653,437 2,484,447
Cash dividends declared (2,719 ) (2,637 ) (7,774 ) (8,152 )
Retained earnings at end of period $ 2,968,076 $ 2,546,338 $ 2,968,076 $ 2,546,338
Earnings per share:
Basic $ 4.38 $ 0.22 $ 5.90 $ 1.02
Diluted $ 4.31 $ 0.22 $ 5.80 $ 1.02
Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.05 $ 0.04 $ 0.14 $ 0.12

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='4',FILE='C:\JMS\106750\11-29553-1\task4995409\29553-1-ba.htm',USER='106750',CD='Dec 5 05:49 2011'

Table of Contents

*DILLARD’S, INC.*

*CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS*

*(Unaudited)*

( Amounts in Thousands)

Nine Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
2011 2010
Operating activities:
Net income $ 322,413 $ 70,043
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property and deferred financing costs 194,272 194,520
Gain on disposal of assets (3,847 ) (3,292 )
Gain on repurchase of debt (173 ) (21 )
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation (10,171 ) (353 )
Asset impairment and store closing charges 1,200 2,208
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in accounts receivable 5,688 11,801
Increase in merchandise inventories (466,379 ) (407,824 )
Increase in other current assets (20,531 ) (22,901 )
(Increase) decrease in other assets (205,503 ) 5,411
Increase in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities 338,632 373,373
Decrease in income taxes payable (20,048 ) (64,054 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 135,553 158,911
Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (80,304 ) (73,750 )
Proceeds from disposal of assets 22,966 6,094
Restricted cash (24,901 ) —
Distribution from joint venture 2,481 —
Net cash used in investing activities (79,758 ) (67,656 )
Financing activities:
Purchase of treasury stock (392,388 ) (241,574 )
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations (55,773 ) (16,522 )
Cash dividends paid (7,533 ) (8,472 )
Increase in short-term borrowings 142,000 —
Proceeds from stock issuance 10,820 386
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation 10,171 353
Net cash used in financing activities (292,703 ) (265,829 )
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (236,908 ) (174,574 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 343,291 341,693
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 106,383 $ 167,119
Non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures $ 6,796 $ 2,500
Stock awards 2,762 2,292
Capital lease transactions — 3,966

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='5',FILE='C:\JMS\106750\11-29553-1\task4995409\29553-1-ba.htm',USER='106750',CD='Dec 5 05:49 2011'

Table of Contents

*DILLARD’S, INC.*

*NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS*

*(Unaudited)*

*Note 1. Basis of Presentation*

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Dillard’s, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2012 due to the seasonal nature of the business.

These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 filed with the SEC on March 23, 2011.

*Restricted cash —* During the three months ended October 29, 2011, our wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary entered into an agreement in which $24.9 million was placed into a trust for the benefit of a third party insurance provider. The purpose of the trust (and additional standby letters of credit of $24.9 million) is to collateralize a third party insurer for workers’ compensation and general liability obligations under casualty insurance programs for policy years through fiscal 2011. Prior to this change, all claims were secured by standby letters of credit.

*Reclassifications —* Certain items have been reclassified from their prior year classifications to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.

*Note 2. Business Segments*

The Company operates in two reportable segments: the operation of retail department stores (“retail operations”) and a general contracting construction company (“construction”).

For the Company’s retail operations, the Company determined its operating segments on a store by store basis. Each store’s operating performance has been aggregated into one reportable segment. The Company’s operating segments are aggregated for financial reporting purposes because they are similar in each of the following areas: economic characteristics, class of consumer, nature of products and distribution methods. Revenues from external customers are derived from merchandise sales, and the Company does not rely on any major customers as a source of revenue. Across all stores, the Company operates one store format under the Dillard’s name where each store offers the same general mix of merchandise with similar categories and similar customers. The Company believes that disaggregating its operating segments would not provide meaningful additional information.

6

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='6',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

The following tables summarize certain segment information, including the reconciliation of those items to the Company’s consolidated operations:

(in thousands of dollars) Retail Operations Construction Consolidated
Three Months Ended October 29, 2011:
Net sales from external customers $ 1,366,362 $ 16,250 $ 1,382,612
Gross profit 502,140 475 502,615
Depreciation and amortization 64,689 45 64,734
Interest and debt expense (income), net 17,791 (41 ) 17,750
Income (loss) before income taxes and income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 40,041 (523 ) 39,518
Income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 293 — 293
Total assets 4,686,248 30,882 4,717,130
Three Months Ended October 30, 2010:
Net sales from external customers $ 1,320,568 $ 23,550 $ 1,344,118
Gross profit 485,629 1,015 486,644
Depreciation and amortization 64,906 47 64,953
Interest and debt expense (income), net 18,118 (75 ) 18,043
Income (loss) before income taxes and income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 21,586 (88 ) 21,498
Income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures (1,082 ) — (1,082 )
Total assets 4,644,060 68,031 4,712,091
Nine Months Ended October 29, 2011:
Net sales from external customers $ 4,247,462 $ 46,095 $ 4,293,557
Gross profit 1,551,936 339 1,552,275
Depreciation and amortization 192,726 136 192,862
Interest and debt expense (income), net 54,567 (120 ) 54,447
Income (loss) before income taxes and income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 182,733 (3,198 ) 179,535
Income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 4,238 — 4,238
Total assets 4,686,248 30,882 4,717,130
Nine Months Ended October 30, 2010:
Net sales from external customers $ 4,108,112 $ 78,512 $ 4,186,624
Gross profit 1,483,197 1,256 1,484,453
Depreciation and amortization 192,987 137 193,124
Interest and debt expense (income), net 55,520 (159 ) 55,361
Income (loss) before income taxes and income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 107,908 (1,780 ) 106,128
Income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures (3,010 ) — (3,010 )
Total assets 4,644,060 68,031 4,712,091

Intersegment construction revenues of $10.8 million and $25.8 million for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011, respectively, and intersegment construction revenues of $9.5 million and $22.2 million for the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, respectively, were eliminated during consolidation and have been excluded from net sales for the respective periods.

7

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='7',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

*Note 3. Stock-Based Compensation*

The Company has various stock option plans that provide for the granting of options to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock to certain key employees of the Company. Exercise and vesting terms for options granted under the plans are determined at each grant date. There were no stock options granted during the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010.

Stock option transactions for the three months ended October 29, 2011 are summarized as follows:

Stock Options Shares Weighted Average — Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of period 2,270,000 $ 25.74
Granted — —
Exercised (25,000 ) 25.74
Expired — —
Outstanding, end of period 2,245,000 $ 25.74
Options exercisable at period end 2,245,000 $ 25.74

During the three months ended October 29, 2011, the intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $0.6 million. At October 29, 2011, the intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options was $58.5 million.

*Note 4. Asset Impairment and Store Closing Charges*

There were no asset impairment and store closing costs recorded during the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $1.2 million for asset impairment and store closing costs. The charge was for the write-down of a property currently held for sale.

During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $2.2 million for asset impairment and store closing costs. The charge was for the write-down of a property currently held for sale.

Following is a summary of the activity in the reserve established for store closing charges for the nine months ended October 29, 2011:

(in thousands) Balance Beginning of Period Adjustments and Charges* Cash Payments Balance End of Period
Rent, property taxes and utilities $ 1,360 $ 880 $ 1,243 $ 997

*included in rentals

Reserve amounts are included in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities.

8

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='8',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

*Note 5. Earnings Per Share Data*

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share data).

Three Months Ended — October 29, October 30, Nine Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
Basic:
Net income $ 228,171 $ 14,381 $ 322,413 $ 70,043
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding 52,107 65,923 54,611 68,635
Basic earnings per share $ 4.38 $ 0.22 $ 5.90 $ 1.02
Three Months Ended — October 29, October 30, Nine Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
Diluted:
Net income $ 228,171 $ 14,381 $ 322,413 $ 70,043
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding 52,107 65,923 54,611 68,635
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation 843 — 963 —
Total weighted average equivalent shares 52,950 65,923 55,574 68,635
Diluted earnings per share $ 4.31 $ 0.22 $ 5.80 $ 1.02

Total stock options outstanding were 2,245,000 and 4,009,369 at October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively. Of these, options to purchase 4,009,369 shares of Class A Common Stock at prices ranging from $24.73 to $26.57 were outstanding at October 30, 2010 but were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per share because the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive. A negligible amount of dilution, included in the weighted average shares computation for the nine months ended October 30, 2010, was insignificant for presentation in the table above.

*Note 6. Comprehensive Income*

The following table shows the computation of comprehensive income (in thousands):

Three Months Ended — October 29, October 30, Nine Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
Net income $ 228,171 $ 14,381 $ 322,413 $ 70,043
Other comprehensive income:
Amortization of retirement plan and other retiree benefit adjustments, net of taxes 411 476 1,233 1,428
Total comprehensive income $ 228,582 $ 14,857 $ 323,646 $ 71,471

*Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies*

On June 10, 2009, a lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas styled Billy K. Berry, Derivatively on behalf of Dillard’s, Inc. v. William Dillard II et al , Case Number CV-09-4227-2 (the “Berry” case). The lawsuit generally sought return of monies and alleged that certain officers and directors of the Company had been overcompensated and/or received improper benefits at the expense of the Company and its shareholders. On February 18, 2010, the Circuit Court entered an “Order of Dismissal with Prejudice and Final Judgment” dismissing the case as to all parties defendant. The Circuit Court’s judgment was affirmed by the

9

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='9',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

Arkansas Court of Appeals. Plaintiff appealed the decision of the Court of Appeals to the Arkansas Supreme Court where, on September 15, 2011, that appeal was denied.

On May 27, 2009, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas styled Steven Harben, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Dillard’s, Inc. v. William Dillard II et al , Case Number 4:09-IV-395 . The lawsuit generally sought return of monies and alleged that certain officers and directors of the Company had been overcompensated and/or received improper benefits at the expense of the Company and its shareholders. On September 30, 2010, the District Court dismissed the lawsuit in its entirety with prejudice but granted plaintiff’s request to stay final judgment pending the exhaustion of all appeals in the Berry case, discussed above. On September 23, 2011, the District Court entered Judgment dismissing the case after the Arkansas Supreme Court denied the Berry appeal. The period for any appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has expired.

Accordingly, each of these cases has been concluded.

Various other legal proceedings, in the form of lawsuits and claims, which occur in the normal course of business, are pending against the Company and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

At October 29, 2011, letters of credit totaling $55.8 million were issued under the Company’s revolving credit facility.

*Note 8. Benefit Plans*

The Company has an unfunded, nonqualified defined benefit plan (“Pension Plan”) for its officers. The Pension Plan is noncontributory and provides benefits based on years of service and compensation during employment. Pension expense is determined using various actuarial cost methods to estimate the total benefits ultimately payable to officers and allocates this cost to service periods. The actuarial assumptions used to calculate pension costs are reviewed annually. The Company made contributions to the Pension Plan of $1.2 million and $3.3 million during the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011, respectively. The Company expects to make a contribution to the Pension Plan of approximately $1.1 million for the remainder of fiscal 2011.

The components of net periodic benefit costs are as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended — October 29, October 30, Nine Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
Components of net periodic benefit costs:
Service cost $ 831 $ 721 $ 2,494 $ 2,165
Interest cost 1,800 1,817 5,400 5,451
Net actuarial loss 492 594 1,475 1,782
Amortization of prior service cost 157 157 470 470
Net periodic benefit costs $ 3,280 $ 3,289 $ 9,839 $ 9,868

*Note 9. Revolving Credit Agreement*

At October 29, 2011, the Company maintained a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (“credit agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank (“JPMorgan”) as the lead agent for various banks, secured by the inventory of Dillard’s, Inc. operating subsidiaries. The credit agreement expires December 12, 2012.

Borrowings under the credit agreement accrue interest starting at either JPMorgan’s Base Rate minus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 1.0% (1.25% at October 29, 2011) subject to certain availability thresholds as defined in the credit agreement.

Limited to 85% of the inventory of certain Company subsidiaries, availability for borrowings and letter of credit obligations under the credit agreement was $1.0 billion at October 29, 2011. Borrowings of $142.0 million were outstanding and letters of credit totaling $55.8 million were issued under this credit agreement leaving unutilized availability under the facility of approximately $802 million at October 29, 2011. There are no financial covenant

10

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='10',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

requirements under the credit agreement provided availability exceeds $100 million. The Company pays an annual commitment fee to the banks of 0.25% of the committed amount less outstanding borrowings and letters of credit.

*Note 10. Stock Repurchase Program*

**May 2011 Stock Plan****

In May 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $250 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock under an open-ended plan (“May 2011 Stock Plan”). This authorization permits the Company to repurchase its Class A Common Stock in the open market, pursuant to preset trading plans meeting the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) or through privately negotiated transactions. During the three months ended October 29, 2011, the Company repurchased 2.9 million shares for $123.7 million at an average price of $42.40 per share. At October 29, 2011, $126.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained under the May 2011 Stock Plan.

**February 2011 Stock Plan****

In February 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $250 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock under an open-ended plan (“February 2011 Stock Plan”). This authorization permitted the Company to repurchase its Class A Common Stock in the open market, pursuant to preset trading plans meeting the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act or through privately negotiated transactions. During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company repurchased 6.0 million shares for $250.0 million at an average price of $41.93 per share, which completed the authorization under the February 2011 Stock Plan.

**2010 Stock Plan****

In August 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $250 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock under an open-ended plan (“2010 Stock Plan”). During the three months ended October 30, 2010, the Company repurchased 2.9 million shares of stock under the 2010 Stock Plan for approximately $71.3 million at an average price of $24.86 per share. During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company repurchased 0.4 million shares for $18.7 million at an average price of $42.19 per share, which completed the remaining authorization under the 2010 Stock Plan.

**2007 Stock Plan****

In November 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $200 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock under an open-ended plan (“2007 Stock Plan”). During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company repurchased 7.2 million shares of stock for approximately $182.6 million at an average price of $25.39 per share, which completed the remaining authorization under the 2007 Stock Plan.

*Note 11. Income Taxes*

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $8.2 million and $14.0 million, respectively, of which $5.6 million and $10.3 million, respectively, would, if recognized, affect the effective tax rate. The Company classifies accrued interest expense and penalties relating to income tax in the condensed consolidated financial statements as income tax expense. The total accrued interest and penalties in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $3.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively. The estimated range of the reasonably possible unrecognized tax benefit decrease in the next twelve months is between $0.5 million and $1.5 million. Changes in the Company’s assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of income.

In January 2011, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary intended to operate as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and transferred certain properties to this subsidiary. The Company entered into this transaction in order to enhance its financial flexibility by providing additional sources of liquidity. At the time, the Company believed that a tax election might be available to the Company that would result in a taxable gain on the transfer of these properties to the REIT. In May 2011, the Company requested that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) review the REIT transaction and a potential tax election available to the Company, through the IRS’s voluntary Pre-Filing Agreement Program (“PFA”). Through the PFA, in September 2011, the Company and the IRS entered into a Closing Agreement On Final Determination Covering Specific Matters under which agreement the

11

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='11',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

IRS agreed with the Company regarding the tax treatment of the transfer of the properties to the REIT and the availability of the tax election to the Company. Based on the agreement with the IRS, during the three months ended October 29, 2011 the Company determined to make the tax election in its tax return for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 (fiscal 2010) which was filed during the quarter. This tax election increases the tax basis of the properties transferred to the REIT to their fair values at the date of the transfer. The income tax that would otherwise be payable because of the gain recognized by this election was largely reduced by the utilization of a capital loss carryforward, that would otherwise have expired as of January 29, 2011, against a portion of the recognized gain. Because of the Company’s past uncertainty regarding the incurrence of capital gain income, the deferred tax asset associated with that capital loss carryforward had been offset by a full valuation allowance since its recognition in fiscal 2005. During the three months ended October 29, 2011, income taxes included the recognition of approximately $201.6 million in tax benefit due to the reversal of the valuation allowance related to the amount of the capital loss carryforward used to offset the capital gain income recognized on the taxable transfer of the properties to the REIT. Approximately $134.4 million of the tax benefit relates to increased basis in depreciable property while approximately $67.2 million of the benefit relates to increased basis in land. Due to the increased tax basis of the depreciable properties transferred to the REIT, the Company will recognize increased tax depreciation deductions in the future which are expected to yield cash tax benefits of approximately $5 million annually in years one through twenty and approximately $2 million annually in years twenty-one through forty beginning with the year ending January 28, 2012. Due to the uncertainty surrounding whether the REIT will dispose of any of its land assets in the future, the Company cannot estimate when or if the cash tax benefits related to the increased basis in land will be received.

During the three months ended October 29, 2011, income taxes included the recognition of: a tax benefit of approximately $201.6 million due to the reversal of a valuation allowance related to a capital loss carryforward; tax benefits related to federal tax credits; and net decreases in unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties. During the three months ended October 30, 2010, income taxes included the recognition of tax benefits primarily due to a decrease in a capital loss valuation allowance.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, income taxes included the recognition of: a tax benefit of approximately $201.6 million due to the reversal of a valuation allowance related to a capital loss carryforward; tax benefits related to federal tax credits; net decreases in unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties; decreases in net operating loss valuation allowances; and decreases in net deferred tax liabilities resulting from legislatively-enacted state tax rate reductions. Additionally, during the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the IRS concluded its examination of the Company’s federal income tax returns for the fiscal tax years 2008 through 2009, and no significant changes occurred in these tax years as a result of such examination. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, income taxes included the recognition of tax benefits primarily due to a state administrative settlement, a decrease in a capital loss valuation allowance, and federal tax credit refund claims.

*Note 12. Income on Joint Venture*

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company received a distribution of excess cash from a mall joint venture of $6.7 million and recorded a related gain of $4.2 million in income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures.

*Note 13. (Gain) Loss on Disposal of Assets*

During the three months ended October 29, 2011, the Company received proceeds of $10.3 million from the sale of two former retail store locations, resulting in gains totaling $1.3 million that were recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

Additionally, during the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company received proceeds of $11.0 million from the sale of an interest in a mall joint venture, resulting in a gain of $2.1 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

During the three months ended October 30, 2010, the Company received proceeds of $1.9 million from the sale of a former retail store location, resulting in a loss of $1.1 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

12

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='12',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

Additionally, during the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company received proceeds of $4.0 million from the sale of a former retail store location, resulting in a gain of $4.0 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

*Note 14. Note Repurchase*

During the three months ended October 29, 2011, the Company repurchased $5.7 million face amount of 6.625% notes with an original maturity on January 15, 2018. This repurchase resulted in a pretax gain of approximately $0.2 million which was recorded in net interest and debt expense during the three months ended October 29, 2011.

During the three months ended October 30, 2010, the Company repurchased $1.2 million face amount of 7.13% notes with an original maturity on August 1, 2018. This repurchase resulted in a pretax gain of approximately $21 thousand which was recorded in net interest and debt expense during the three months ended October 30, 2010.

*Note 15. Fair Value Disclosures*

The estimated fair values of financial instruments which are presented herein have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt and subordinated debentures is based on market prices or dealer quotes (for publicly traded unsecured notes) and on discounted future cash flows using current interest rates for financial instruments with similar characteristics and maturities (for bank notes and mortgage notes).

The fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and other short-term borrowings approximates their carrying values at October 29, 2011 due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt at October 29, 2011 was approximately $679 million. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt at October 29, 2011 was $692 million. The fair value of the Company’s subordinated debentures at October 29, 2011 was approximately $194 million. The carrying value of the Company’s subordinated debentures at October 29, 2011 was $200 million.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The FASB’s accounting guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels:

· Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

· Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active

· Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions

13

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='13',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

Basis of Fair Value Measurements — Quoted Prices Significant
In Active Other Significant
Fair Value Markets for Observable Unobservable
of Assets Identical Items Inputs Inputs
(in thousands) (Liabilities) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Long-lived assets held for sale
As of October 29, 2011 $ 17,348 $ — $ — $ 17,348
As of January 29, 2011 27,548 — — 27,548
As of October 30, 2010 $ 28,748 $ — $ — $ 28,748
As of January 30, 2010 33,956 — — 33,956

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying value of $27.5 million were written down to their fair value of $26.3 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $1.2 million, which was included in earnings for the period. During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company sold two former retail store locations with carrying values totaling $9.0 million.

During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying value of $34.0 million were written down to their fair value of $31.7 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $2.2 million, which was included in earnings for the period. The inputs used to calculate the fair value of these long-lived assets in both periods included selling prices from commercial real estate transactions for similar assets in similar markets that we estimated would be used by a market participant in valuing these assets. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company also sold a former retail store location with a carrying value of $3.0 million.

*Note 16. Recently Issued Accounting Standards*

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)—Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs . The amendments in this update change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is to be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Presentation of Comprehensive Income , to make the presentation of items within other comprehensive income (“OCI”) more prominent. The new standard will require companies to present items of net income, items of OCI and total comprehensive income in one continuous statement or two separate consecutive statements, and companies will no longer be allowed to present items of OCI in the statement of stockholders’ equity. This new update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is to be applied retrospectively. The adoption of this new standard may change the order in which certain financial statements are presented and will provide additional detail in those financial statements when applicable, but will not have any other impact on the Company’s financial statements.

*Note 17. Subsequent Event*

The Company reached an agreement effective November 30, 2011 with i2 Technologies, Inc. (“i2”), a subsidiary of JDA Software Group, Inc. (“JDA”), to settle a lawsuit filed by Dillard’s against i2 over software sold to Dillard’s by i2 in 2000, prior to JDA’s acquisition of i2 in 2010. Pursuant to the agreement, i2 paid Dillard’s $57.0 million during the three months ending January 28, 2012. After providing for income taxes and settlement related expenses, the Company expects to record approximately $28.5 million of net income from this settlement during the three months ending January 28, 2012.

14

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='14',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

*Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the footnotes thereto included elsewhere in this report, as well as the financial and other information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2011.

*EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW*

Improved sales headlined our third quarter operating performance of fiscal 2011, contributing to record-setting earnings per share. Extending the sales momentum from our first two quarters, comparable store sales for the quarter ended October 29, 2011 increased 5% over the comparable prior year quarter as gross margin rates were held and operating expenses were leveraged. Net income for the quarter increased to $228.2 million, or $4.31 per share—our highest historical third quarter earnings per share—compared to $14.4 million, or $0.22 per share, in the comparable prior year quarter.

Included in net income for the quarter ended October 29, 2011 are:

· a $201.6 million tax benefit ($3.81 per share) due to a reversal of a valuation allowance related to the amount of the capital loss carryforward used to offset the capital gain income recognized on the taxable transfer of properties to our REIT and

· a $1.3 million pretax gain ($0.9 million after tax or $0.02 per share) related to the sale of two former retail store locations.

Included in net income for the quarter ended October 30, 2010 is a $1.1 million pretax loss ($0.7 million after tax or $0.02 per share) related to the sale of a closed store and a $1.2 million income tax benefit ($0.02 per share) for a decrease in a capital loss valuation allowance.

Highlights of the quarter ended October 29, 2011 included:

· record earnings per share for a third quarter of $4.31 per share compared to $0.22 per share for the prior year third quarter. Net income was $228.2 million for the quarter ended October 29, 2011 compared to net income of $14.4 million for the quarter ended October 30, 2010.

· a comparable store sales increase of 5% while maintaining gross margin from retail operations at 36.8% of sales and

· continued operating expense control, decreasing 30 basis points of sales.

· the repurchase of approximately $123.7 million (2.9 million shares) of Class A Common Stock.

As of October 29, 2011, we had working capital of $672.1 million, cash and cash equivalents of $106.4 million and $1,034.0 million of total debt outstanding, excluding capital lease obligations. Cash flows from operating activities were $135.6 million for the nine months ended October 29, 2011. We operated 304 total stores, including 16 clearance centers, and one internet store as of October 29, 2011, a decrease of 6 stores from the same period last year.

15

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='15',FILE='C:\JMS\105948\11-29553-1\task4995953\29553-1-bc.htm',USER='105948',CD='Dec 5 22:45 2011'

Table of Contents

*Key Performance Indicators*

We use a number of key indicators of financial condition and operating performance to evaluate our business, including the following:

Three Months Ended* — October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010
Net sales (in millions) $ 1,382.6 $ 1,344.1
Net sales trend 3 % (1 )%
Gross profit (in millions) $ 502.6 $ 486.6
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales 36.4 % 36.2 %
Cash flow from operations (in millions) $ 135.6 $ 158.9
Total retail store count at end of period 304 310
Retail sales per square foot $ 26 $ 25
Retail store sales trend 4 % 0 %
Comparable retail store sales trend 5 % 1 %
Comparable retail store inventory trend 4 % (2 )%
Retail merchandise inventory turnover 2.4 2.4

*Cash flow from operations data is for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010.

*General*

*Net sales .* Net sales include merchandise sales of comparable and non-comparable stores and revenue recognized on contracts of CDI Contractors, LLC (“CDI”), the Company’s general contracting construction company. Comparable store sales include sales for those stores which were in operation for a full period in both the current month and the corresponding month for the prior year. Non-comparable store sales include: sales in the current fiscal year from stores opened during the previous fiscal year before they are considered comparable stores; sales from new stores opened during the current fiscal year; sales in the previous fiscal year for stores closed during the current or previous fiscal year that are no longer considered comparable stores; and sales in clearance centers.

*Service charges and other income* . Service charges include income generated through the long-term marketing and servicing alliance (“Alliance”) with GE Consumer Finance (“GE”), which owns and manages the Dillard’s branded proprietary credit cards. Other income includes rental income, shipping and handling fees and lease income on leased departments.

*Cost of sales* . Cost of sales includes the cost of merchandise sold (net of purchase discounts), bankcard fees, freight to the distribution centers, employee and promotional discounts, non-specific margin maintenance allowances and direct payroll for salon personnel. Cost of sales also includes CDI contract costs, which comprise all direct material and labor costs, subcontract costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, employee benefits and insurance program costs.

*Advertising, selling, administrative and general expenses .* Advertising, selling, administrative and general expenses include buying, occupancy, selling, distribution, warehousing, store and corporate expenses (including payroll and employee benefits), insurance, employment taxes, advertising, management information systems, legal and other corporate level expenses. Buying expenses consist of payroll, employee benefits and travel for design, buying and merchandising personnel.

*Depreciation and amortization .* Depreciation and amortization expenses include depreciation and amortization on property and equipment.

*Rentals* . Rentals include expenses for store leases and data processing and other equipment rentals.

*Interest and debt expense, net* . Interest and debt expense includes interest, net of interest income, relating to the Company’s unsecured notes, mortgage notes, term note and subordinated debentures, amortization of financing costs and interest on capital lease obligations.

16

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='16',FILE='C:\JMS\105918\11-29553-1\task4995336\29553-1-be.htm',USER='105918',CD='Dec 4 08:06 2011'

Table of Contents

*(Gain) loss on disposal of assets . (* Gain) loss on disposal of assets includes the net gain or loss on the sale or disposal of property and equipment and the gain on the sale of an interest in a mall joint venture.

*Asset impairment and store closing charges .* Asset impairment and store closing charges consist of write-downs to fair value of under-performing or available-for-sale properties and exit costs associated with the closure of certain stores. Exit costs include future rent, taxes and common area maintenance expenses from the time the stores are closed.

*Income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures* . Income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures includes the Company’s portion of the income or loss of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures as well as a distribution of excess cash from one of the Company’s mall joint ventures.

*Seasonality and Inflation*

Our business, like many other retailers, is subject to seasonal influences, with a significant portion of sales and income typically realized during the last quarter of our fiscal year due to the holiday season. Because of the seasonality of our business, results from any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year.

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results during the periods presented; however, there can be no assurance that our business will not be affected by such in the future. In response to recent economic volatility in Asia and to increasing fabric prices (including cotton) and overseas wages, we have sought solutions to help minimize the effects of these events on our operations during fiscal 2011 by (1) negotiating efficiencies through our longstanding relationships with our current suppliers, (2) considering alternative manufacturing sources, (3) redesigning our garments and incorporating other types of fibers where appropriate and (4) adjusting price points as necessary. Consequently, we believe the effects of these currently known trends on our gross margins in fiscal 2011 will be minimal.

*RESULTS OF OPERATIONS*

The following table sets forth the results of operations and percentage of net sales for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended — October 29, October 30, Nine Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Service charges and other income 2.5 2.1 2.2 2.1
102.5 102.1 102.2 102.1
Cost of sales 63.6 63.8 63.8 64.5
Advertising, selling, administrative and general expenses 29.3 29.6 27.7 28.3
Depreciation and amortization 4.7 4.8 4.5 4.6
Rentals 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9
Interest and debt expense, net 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets (0.1 ) 0.1 (0.1 ) (0.1 )
Asset impairment and store closing charges 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Income before income taxes and income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 2.9 1.6 4.2 2.5
Income taxes (benefit) (13.6 ) 0.4 (3.2 ) 0.8
Income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures 0.0 (0.1 ) 0.1 0.0
Net income 16.5 % 1.1 % 7.5 % 1.7 %

17

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='17',FILE='C:\JMS\105918\11-29553-1\task4995336\29553-1-be.htm',USER='105918',CD='Dec 4 08:06 2011'

Table of Contents

*Net Sales*

Three Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
(in thousands of dollars) 2011 2010 $ Change
Net sales:
Retail operations segment $ 1,366,362 $ 1,320,568 $ 45,794
Construction segment 16,250 23,550 (7,300 )
Total net sales $ 1,382,612 $ 1,344,118 $ 38,494

The percent change by category in the Company’s retail operations segment sales for the three months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three months ended October 30, 2010 as well as the percentage by segment and category to total net sales for the three months ended October 29, 2011 is as follows:

Three Months — % Change 2011-2010 % of Net Sales
Retail operations segment
Cosmetics 4.4 % 16 %
Ladies’ apparel and accessories 3.0 36
Juniors’ and children’s apparel 4.8 9
Men’s apparel and accessories 3.0 16
Shoes 4.8 17
Home and furniture (1.3 ) 5
99
Construction segment 1
Total 100 %

Net sales from the retail operations segment increased 4%, exclusive of adjustments to the sales reserve, during the three months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three months ended October 30, 2010 while sales in comparable stores increased 5% between the same periods. Sales of shoes and juniors’ and children’s apparel increased significantly during the period. Sales of cosmetics, ladies’ apparel and accessories and men’s apparel and accessories increased moderately during the period while sales in the home and furniture category declined slightly during the period.

The number of sales transactions decreased 3% for the three months ended October 29, 2011 over the comparable prior year period while the average dollars per sales transaction increased significantly. We recorded an allowance for sales returns of $7.7 million and $7.2 million as of October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively.

We believe that we may continue to see some sales growth in the retail operations segment during the coming months; however, there is no guarantee of improved sales performance.

Net sales from the construction segment decreased $7.3 million or 31% during the three months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three months ended October 30, 2010. We believe this decrease is primarily attributable to the negative impact that the weak United States economy has had in previous quarters and continues to have on demand for construction projects in private industry. During the first nine months of 2011, we have been awarded approximately $136 million in new contracts.

18

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='18',FILE='C:\JMS\105918\11-29553-1\task4995336\29553-1-be.htm',USER='105918',CD='Dec 4 08:06 2011'

Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended — October 29, October 30,
(in thousands of dollars) 2011 2010 $ Change
Net sales:
Retail operations segment $ 4,247,462 $ 4,108,112 $ 139,350
Construction segment 46,095 78,512 (32,417 )
Total net sales $ 4,293,557 $ 4,186,624 $ 106,933

The percent change by category in the Company’s retail operations segment sales for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010 as well as the percentage by segment and category to total net sales for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 is as follows:

Nine Months — % Change 2011-2010 % of Net Sales
Retail operations segment
Cosmetics 4.1 % 15 %
Ladies’ apparel and accessories 2.8 38
Juniors’ and children’s apparel 4.0 9
Men’s apparel and accessories 4.4 17
Shoes 5.3 15
Home and furniture (3.4 ) 5
99
Construction segment 1
Total 100 %

Net sales from the retail operations segment increased 3% during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010 while sales in comparable stores increased 4% between the same periods. Moderate sales increases were noted in most merchandise categories during the period, with the exception of shoes which experienced a significant sales increase and home and furniture which experienced a moderate sales decline.

The number of sales transactions decreased 2% for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010 while the average dollars per sales transaction increased significantly.

Net sales from the construction segment decreased $32.4 million or 41% during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010.

*Service Charges and Other Income*

(in thousands of dollars) Three Months Ended — October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 Nine Months Ended — October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 Three Months — $ Change 2011-2010 Nine Months — $ Change 2011-2010
Service charges and other income:
Retail operations segment
Leased department income $ 2,372 $ 2,311 $ 7,106 $ 6,844 $ 61 $ 262
Income from GE marketing and servicing alliance 25,297 20,926 70,515 64,133 4,371 6,382
Shipping and handling income 4,012 3,659 12,538 11,547 353 991
Other 2,115 2,000 6,475 6,896 115 (421 )
33,796 28,896 96,634 89,420 4,900 7,214
Construction segment 130 23 156 444 107 (288 )
Total $ 33,926 $ 28,919 $ 96,790 $ 89,864 $ 5,007 $ 6,926

Service charges and other income is composed primarily of income from the Alliance with GE. Income from the Alliance increased $4.4 million during the three months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three months ended October 30, 2010 primarily due to decreased credit losses and increased late charge fee income. Income from the

19

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='19',FILE='C:\JMS\105918\11-29553-1\task4995336\29553-1-be.htm',USER='105918',CD='Dec 4 08:06 2011'

Table of Contents

Alliance increased $6.4 million during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010 primarily due to decreased credit losses partially offset by reduced finance charge and late charge fee income.

*Gross Profit*

(in thousands of dollars) October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 $ Change % Change
Gross profit:
Three months ended
Retail operations segment $ 502,140 $ 485,629 $ 16,511 3.4 %
Construction segment 475 1,015 (540 ) (53.2 )
Total gross profit $ 502,615 $ 486,644 $ 15,971 3.3 %
Nine months ended
Retail operations segment $ 1,551,936 $ 1,483,197 $ 68,739 4.6 %
Construction segment 339 1,256 (917 ) (73.0 )
Total gross profit $ 1,552,275 $ 1,484,453 $ 67,822 4.6 %
Three Months Ended — October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 Nine Months Ended — October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010
Gross profit as a percentage of segment net sales:
Retail operations segment 36.8 % 36.8 % 36.5 % 36.1 %
Construction segment 2.9 4.3 0.7 1.6
Total gross profit as a percentage of net sales 36.4 36.2 36.2 35.5

Gross profit improved 20 basis points of sales and 70 basis points of sales during the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, respectively.

Gross profit as a percentage of sales from retail operations remained flat during the three months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three months ended October 30, 2010 as a result of increased markdowns partially offset by increased markups. Gross profit as a percentage of sales from retail operations improved 40 basis points during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010 as a result of increased markups and decreased markdowns.

During the three months ended October 29, 2011 as compared to the three months ended October 30, 2010, gross margin was flat in most merchandise categories, with the exception of a slight gross margin decline in ladies’ apparel and accessories and a significant gross margin improvement in home and furniture.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010, gross margin improved moderately in home and furniture and improved slightly in shoes and juniors’ and children’s apparel. Gross margin was flat in cosmetics and ladies’ apparel and accessories while men’s apparel and accessories experienced a slight gross margin decline.

Inventory increased 4% in comparable stores as of October 29, 2011 compared to October 30, 2010 as management has planned more aggressively in light of improved sales trends. A 1% change in the dollar amount of markdowns would have impacted net income by approximately $2 million and $6 million for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011, respectively.

Gross profit from the construction segment declined 140 basis points of sales and 90 basis points of sales during the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, respectively. The three-month gross margin decline from the prior year was the result of fewer projects caused by the reduction in demand for construction services combined with pricing pressures in an already competitive marketplace. The nine-month gross margin decline was also attributable to a $1.2 million loss recorded during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 on an electrical contract partially offset by a $2.2 million loss recorded in the

20

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='20',FILE='C:\JMS\105918\11-29553-1\task4995336\29553-1-be.htm',USER='105918',CD='Dec 4 08:06 2011'

Table of Contents

prior year comparable period on certain electrical contracts stemming from job delays due to bad weather and job underperformance.

*Advertising, Selling, Administrative and General Expenses (“SG&A”)*

(in thousands of dollars) October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 $ Change % Change
SG&A:
Three months ended
Retail operations segment $ 403,658 $ 397,355 $ 6,303 1.6 %
Construction segment 1,108 1,139 (31 ) (2.7 )
Total SG&A $ 404,766 $ 398,494 $ 6,272 1.6 %
Nine months ended
Retail operations segment $ 1,186,492 $ 1,180,737 $ 5,755 0.5 %
Construction segment 3,578 3,453 125 3.6
Total SG&A $ 1,190,070 $ 1,184,190 $ 5,880 0.5 %
Three Months Ended — October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 Nine Months Ended — October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010
SG&A as a percentage of segment net sales:
Retail operations segment 29.5 % 30.1 % 27.9 % 28.7 %
Construction segment 6.8 4.8 7.8 4.4
Total SG&A as a percentage of net sales 29.3 29.6 27.7 28.3

SG&A improved 30 basis points of sales during the three months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three months ended October 30, 2010 while total SG&A dollars increased $6.3 million. The dollar increase was most noted in payroll and payroll related taxes ($4.9 million), primarily of selling payroll, and supplies ($3.3 million) partially offset by decreased net advertising expenditures ($2.8 million) and utilities ($2.3 million).

SG&A improved 60 basis points of sales during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010 while total SG&A dollars increased $5.9 million. The dollar increase was most noted in payroll and payroll related taxes ($10.4 million), primarily of selling payroll, and supplies ($6.7 million) partially offset by decreased net advertising expenditures ($8.7 million).

*Rentals*

(in thousands of dollars) October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 $ Change % Change
Rentals:
Three months ended
Retail operations segment $ 11,213 $ 11,626 $ (413 ) (3.6 )%
Construction segment 16 15 1 6.7
Total rentals $ 11,229 $ 11,641 $ (412 ) (3.5 )%
Nine months ended
Retail operations segment $ 34,763 $ 36,537 $ (1,774 ) (4.9 )%
Construction segment 35 61 (26 ) (42.6 )
Total rentals $ 34,798 $ 36,598 $ (1,800 ) (4.9 )%

The decrease in rental expense for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, respectively, was primarily due to a decrease in the amount of equipment leased by the Company.

21

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='21',FILE='C:\JMS\105918\11-29553-1\task4995336\29553-1-be.htm',USER='105918',CD='Dec 4 08:06 2011'

Table of Contents

*Interest and Debt Expense, Net*

(in thousands of dollars) October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 $ Change % Change
Interest and debt expense (income), net:
Three months ended
Retail operations segment $ 17,791 $ 18,118 $ (327 ) (1.8 )%
Construction segment (41 ) (75 ) 34 45.3
Total interest and debt expense, net $ 17,750 $ 18,043 $ (293 ) (1.6 )%
Nine months ended
Retail operations segment $ 54,567 $ 55,520 $ (953 ) (1.7 )%
Construction segment (120 ) (159 ) 39 24.5
Total interest and debt expense, net $ 54,447 $ 55,361 $ (914 ) (1.7 )%

The decrease in net interest and debt expense for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 is primarily attributable to note maturities and repurchases during the period partially offset by an increase in credit facility interest. Total weighted average debt outstanding during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 increased approximately $35.9 million compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010.

*(Gain) Loss on Disposal of Assets*

(in thousands of dollars) October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 $ Change
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets:
Three months ended
Retail operations segment $ (1,456 ) $ 934 $ 2,390
Construction segment — — —
Total (gain) loss on disposal of assets $ (1,456 ) $ 934 $ 2,390
Nine months ended
Retail operations segment $ (3,911 ) $ (3,280 ) $ 631
Construction segment 64 (12 ) (76 )
Total (gain) loss on disposal of assets $ (3,847 ) $ (3,292 ) $ 555

During the three months ended October 29, 2011, the Company received proceeds of $10.3 million from the sale of two former retail store locations, resulting in gains totaling $1.3 million that were recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

Additionally, during the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company received proceeds of $11.0 million from the sale of an interest in a mall joint venture, resulting in a gain of $2.1 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

During the three months ended October 30, 2010, the Company received proceeds of $1.9 million from the sale of a former retail store location, resulting in a loss of $1.1 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

Additionally, during the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company received proceeds of $4.0 million from the sale of a former retail store location, resulting in a gain of $4.0 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

22

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='22',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'

Table of Contents

*Asset Impairment and Store Closing Charges*

(in thousands of dollars) October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 $ Change
Asset impairment and store closing charges:
Nine months ended
Retail operations segment $ 1,200 $ 2,208 $ (1,008 )
Construction segment — — —
Total asset impairment and store closing charges $ 1,200 $ 2,208 $ (1,008 )

There were no asset impairment and store closing costs recorded during the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $1.2 million for asset impairment and store closing costs. The charge was for the write-down of a property currently held for sale.

During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $2.2 million for asset impairment and store closing costs. The charge was for the write-down of a property currently held for sale.

*Income Taxes*

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $8.2 million and $14.0 million, respectively, of which $5.6 million and $10.3 million, respectively, would, if recognized, affect the effective tax rate. The Company classifies accrued interest expense and penalties relating to income tax in the condensed consolidated financial statements as income tax expense. The total accrued interest and penalties in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was $3.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively. The estimated range of the reasonably possible unrecognized tax benefit decrease in the next twelve months is between $0.5 million and $1.5 million. Changes in the Company’s assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of income.

In January 2011, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary intended to operate as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and transferred certain properties to this subsidiary. The Company entered into this transaction in order to enhance its financial flexibility by providing additional sources of liquidity. At the time, the Company believed that a tax election might be available to the Company that would result in a taxable gain on the transfer of these properties to the REIT. In May 2011, the Company requested that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) review the REIT transaction and a potential tax election available to the Company, through the IRS’s voluntary Pre-Filing Agreement Program (“PFA”). Through the PFA, in September 2011, the Company and the IRS entered into a Closing Agreement On Final Determination Covering Specific Matters under which agreement the IRS agreed with the Company regarding the tax treatment of the transfer of the properties to the REIT and the availability of the tax election to the Company. Based on the agreement with the IRS, during the three months ended October 29, 2011 the Company determined to make the tax election in its tax return for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 (fiscal 2010) which was filed during the quarter. This tax election increases the tax basis of the properties transferred to the REIT to their fair values at the date of the transfer. The income tax that would otherwise be payable because of the gain recognized by this election was largely reduced by the utilization of a capital loss carryforward, that would otherwise have expired as of January 29, 2011, against a portion of the recognized gain. Because of the Company’s past uncertainty regarding the incurrence of capital gain income, the deferred tax asset associated with that capital loss carryforward had been offset by a full valuation allowance since its recognition in fiscal 2005. During the three months ended October 29, 2011, income taxes included the recognition of approximately $201.6 million in tax benefit due to the reversal of the valuation allowance related to the amount of the capital loss carryforward used to offset the capital gain income recognized on the taxable transfer of the properties to the REIT. Approximately $134.4 million of the tax benefit relates to increased basis in depreciable property while approximately $67.2 million of the benefit relates to increased basis in land. Due to the increased tax basis of the depreciable properties transferred to the REIT, the Company will recognize increased tax depreciation deductions in the future which are expected to yield cash tax benefits of approximately $5 million annually in years one through twenty and approximately $2 million annually in years twenty-one through forty beginning with the year ending January 28, 2012. Due to the uncertainty surrounding whether the REIT will dispose of any of its land assets in the future, the Company cannot estimate when or if the cash tax benefits related to the increased basis in land will be received.

23

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='23',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'

Table of Contents

The Company’s estimated federal and state income tax rate, inclusive of income on and equity in losses of joint ventures, was approximately (473.1)% and 29.6% for the three months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively. During the three months ended October 29, 2011, income taxes included the recognition of: a tax benefit of approximately $201.6 million due to the reversal of a valuation allowance related to a capital loss carryforward; tax benefits related to federal tax credits; and net decreases in unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties. During the three months ended October 30, 2010, income taxes included the recognition of tax benefits primarily due to a decrease in a capital loss valuation allowance.

The Company’s estimated federal and state income tax rate, inclusive of income on and equity in losses of joint ventures, was approximately (75.4)% and 32.1% for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively. During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, income taxes included the recognition of: a tax benefit of approximately $201.6 million due to the reversal of a valuation allowance related to a capital loss carryforward; tax benefits related to federal tax credits; net decreases in unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties; decreases in net operating loss valuation allowances; and decreases in net deferred tax liabilities resulting from legislatively-enacted state tax rate reductions. Additionally, during the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the IRS concluded its examination of the Company’s federal income tax returns for the fiscal tax years 2008 through 2009, and no significant changes occurred in these tax years as a result of such examination. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, income taxes included the recognition of tax benefits primarily due to a state administrative settlement, a decrease in a capital loss valuation allowance, and federal tax credit refund claims.

The Company’s income tax rate for the remainder of fiscal 2011 is dependent upon results of operations and may change if the results for fiscal 2011 are different from current expectations. The Company’s effective tax rate for the remainder of fiscal 2011 is estimated to approximate 36%.

*FINANCIAL CONDITION*

*Financial Position Summary*

(in thousands of dollars) October 29, 2011 January 29, 2011 $ Change % Change
Cash and cash equivalents $ 106,383 $ 343,291 $ (236,908 ) (69.0 )%
Restricted cash 24,901 — 24,901 *
Other short-term borrowings 142,000 — 142,000 *
Long-term debt, including current portion 692,031 746,412 (54,381 ) (7.3 )
Subordinated debentures 200,000 200,000 — —
Stockholders’ equity 1,832,367 2,086,720 (254,353 ) (12.2 )
Current ratio 1.52 2.05
Debt to capitalization 36.1 % 31.2 %
(in thousands of dollars) October 29, 2011 October 30, 2010 $ Change % Change
Cash and cash equivalents $ 106,383 $ 167,119 $ (60,736 ) (36.3 )%
Restricted cash 24,901 — 24,901 *
Other short-term borrowings 142,000 — 142,000 *
Long-term debt, including current portion 692,031 746,849 (54,818 ) (7.3 )
Subordinated debentures 200,000 200,000 — —
Stockholders’ equity 1,832,367 2,116,565 (284,198 ) (13.4 )
Current ratio 1.52 1.76
Debt to capitalization 36.1 % 30.9 %

*percentage not meaningful

Net cash flows from operations decreased to $135.6 million during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 compared to $158.9 million for the nine months ended October 30, 2010. This $23.3 million decrease was primarily

24

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='24',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'

Table of Contents

attributable to a decrease of $55.3 million related to changes in working capital items, primarily due to increases in inventories as the Company responds to improved sales trends. This decrease was partially offset by higher net income, as adjusted for non-cash items, of $31.9 million for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2010.

GE owns and manages Dillard’s branded proprietary credit card business under the Alliance that expires in fiscal 2014. The Alliance provides for certain payments to be made by GE to the Company, including a revenue sharing and marketing reimbursement. The Company received income of approximately $70.5 million and $64.1 million from GE during the nine months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively. While future cash flows under this Alliance are difficult to predict, the Company expects income from the Alliance to improve moderately during fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010. The amount the Company receives is dependent on the level of sales on GE accounts, the level of balances carried on the GE accounts by GE customers, payment rates on GE accounts, finance charge rates and other fees on GE accounts, the level of credit losses for the GE accounts as well as GE’s funding costs.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company received proceeds of $10.3 million from the sale of two former retail store locations, resulting in gains totaling $1.3 million that were recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets. Additionally, during the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company received proceeds of $11.0 million from the sale of an interest in a mall joint venture, resulting in a gain of $2.1 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company received proceeds of $1.9 million from the sale of a former retail store location, resulting in a loss of $1.1 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets. The Company also received proceeds of $4.0 million from the sale of a former retail store location, resulting in a gain of $4.0 million that was recorded in (gain) loss on disposal of assets.

Capital expenditures were $80.3 million and $73.8 million for the nine months ended October 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, respectively. The current year expenditures were primarily for the remodeling of existing stores and equipment upgrades, including installation of the Company’s new internet fulfillment center located in Maumelle, Arkansas which is expected to be fully operational by early fiscal 2012. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 are expected to be approximately $125 million compared to actual expenditures of $98.2 million during fiscal 2010. There are no planned new store openings for fiscal 2011.

D uring the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company purchased two corporate aircraft for approximately $34 million that were previously leased under operating leases.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, we closed our Highland Mall location in Austin, Texas (190,000 square feet), our Decatur Mall location in Decatur, Alabama (128,000 square feet), our Westminster Mall location in Westminster, Colorado (159,000 square feet), and our Virginia Center Commons location in Glenn Allen, Virginia (96,000 square feet). We remain committed to closing under-performing stores where appropriate and may incur future closing costs related to these stores when they close.

During the three months ended October 29, 2011, our wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary entered into an agreement in which $24.9 million was placed into a trust for the benefit of a third party insurance provider. The purpose of the trust (and additional standby letters of credit of $24.9 million) is to collateralize a third party insurer for workers’ compensation and general liability obligations under casualty insurance programs for policy years through fiscal 2011. We believe collateralizing these obligations with cash is cost-effective, since the fees that would have been paid for the standby letters of credit exceed the amount of interest which could have been earned if the cash had been invested. Prior to this change, all claims were secured by standby letters of credit. The cash in the trust was recorded as restricted cash.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company received a distribution of excess cash from a mall joint venture of $6.7 million and recorded a related gain of $4.2 million in income on and equity in (losses) of joint ventures.

The Company had cash on hand, including restricted cash, of $131.3 million as of October 29, 2011. As part of our overall liquidity management strategy and for peak working capital requirements, the Company has a $1.0 billion

25

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='25',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'

Table of Contents

credit facility. L imited to 85% of the inventory of certain Company subsidiaries, availability for borrowings and letter of credit obligations under the credit agreement was $1.0 billion at October 29, 2011. Borrowings of $142.0 million were outstanding and letters of credit totaling $55.8 million were issued under this credit agreement leaving unutilized availability under the facility of approximately $802 million at October 29, 2011. Borrowings, net of invested cash, were $117.7 million at October 29, 2011.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company repurchased 9.3 million shares of Class A Common Stock for $392.4 million at an average price of $42.09 per share under its 2010, February 2011 and May 2011 Stock Plans. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company repurchased 10.1 million shares of stock for approximately $253.9 million (including the accrual of $12.3 million of share repurchase that had not settled as of October 30, 2010) at an average price of $25.24 per share under its 2007 and 2010 Stock Plans. At October 29, 2011, no authorization remained under the 2007, 2010 and February 2011 Stock Plans, and $126.3 million of authorization remained under the May 2011 Stock Plan.

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company made principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $55.8 million, including the repurchase of $5.7 million face amount of 6.625% notes with an original maturity on January 15, 2018. This repurchase resulted in a pretax gain of approximately $0.2 million which was recorded in net interest and debt expense.

During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company made principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $16.5 million, including the payoff of approximately $13 million in capital lease obligations for two corporate aircraft and the repurchase of $1.2 million face amount of 7.13% notes with an original maturity on August 1, 2018. The repurchase resulted in a pretax gain of approximately $21 thousand which was recorded in net interest and debt expense.

During fiscal 2011, the Company expects to finance its capital expenditures and its working capital requirements, including required debt repayments and stock repurchases, if any, from cash on hand, cash flows generated from operations and utilization of the credit facility. The Company expects peak borrowings under the credit facility during fiscal 2011, net of invested cash, to be approximately $200 million. Depending on conditions in the capital markets and other factors, the Company will from time to time consider other possible financing transactions, the proceeds of which could be used to refinance current indebtedness or for other corporate purposes.

There have been no material changes in the information set forth under caption “Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments” in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

*OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS*

The Company has not created, and is not party to, any special-purpose entities or off-balance-sheet arrangements for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating the Company’s business. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements or relationships that are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or the availability of capital resources.

*NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS*

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)—Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs . The amendments in this update change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is to be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Presentation of Comprehensive Income , to make the presentation of items within other comprehensive income (“OCI”) more prominent. The new standard will require companies to present items of net income, items of OCI and total

26

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='26',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'

Table of Contents

comprehensive income in one continuous statement or two separate consecutive statements, and companies will no longer be allowed to present items of OCI in the statement of stockholders’ equity. This new update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is to be applied retrospectively. The adoption of this new standard may change the order in which certain financial statements are presented and will provide additional detail in those financial statements when applicable, but will not have any other impact on the Company’s financial statements.

*FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION*

This report contains certain forward-looking statements. The following are or may constitute forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: (a) statements including words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “believe,” “expect,” “future,” “potential,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative or other variations thereof; (b) statements regarding matters that are not historical facts; and (c) statements about the Company’s future occurrences, plans and objectives, including statements regarding management’s expectations and forecasts for the remainder of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012. The Company cautions that forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions of management and information available to management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information, or otherwise. Forward-looking statements of the Company involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various important factors. Actual future performance, outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by the Company and its management as a result of a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Representative examples of those factors include (without limitation) general retail industry conditions and macro-economic conditions; economic and weather conditions for regions in which the Company’s stores are located and the effect of these factors on the buying patterns of the Company’s customers, including the effect of changes in prices and availability of oil and natural gas; the availability of consumer credit; the impact of competitive pressures in the department store industry and other retail channels including specialty, off-price, discount and Internet retailers; changes in consumer spending patterns, debt levels and their ability to meet credit obligations; changes in legislation, affecting such matters as the cost of employee benefits or credit card income; adequate and stable availability of materials, production facilities and labor from which the Company sources its merchandise at acceptable pricing; changes in operating expenses, including employee wages, commission structures and related benefits; system failures or data security breaches; possible future acquisitions of store properties from other department store operators; the continued availability of financing in amounts and at the terms necessary to support the Company’s future business; fluctuations in LIBOR and other base borrowing rates; potential disruption from terrorist activity and the effect on ongoing consumer confidence; epidemic, pandemic or other public health issues; potential disruption of international trade and supply chain efficiencies; world conflict and the possible impact on consumer spending patterns and other economic and demographic changes of similar or dissimilar nature. The Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, contain other information on factors that may affect financial results or cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

*Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk*

There have been no material changes in the information set forth under caption “Item 7A-Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

27

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='27',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'

Table of Contents

*Item 4. Controls and Procedures*

The Company has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). The Company’s management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report, and based on that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended October 29, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

28

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='28',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'

Table of Contents

*PART II. OTHER INFORMATION*

*Item 1. Legal Proceedings*

On June 10, 2009, a lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas styled Billy K. Berry, Derivatively on behalf of Dillard’s, Inc. v. William Dillard II et al , Case Number CV-09-4227-2 (the “Berry” case). The lawsuit generally sought return of monies and alleged that certain officers and directors of the Company had been overcompensated and/or received improper benefits at the expense of the Company and its shareholders. On February 18, 2010, the Circuit Court entered an “Order of Dismissal with Prejudice and Final Judgment” dismissing the case as to all parties defendant. The Circuit Court’s judgment was affirmed by the Arkansas Court of Appeals. Plaintiff appealed the decision of the Court of Appeals to the Arkansas Supreme Court where, on September 15, 2011, that appeal was denied.

On May 27, 2009, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas styled Steven Harben, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Dillard’s, Inc. v. William Dillard II et al , Case Number 4:09-IV-395 . The lawsuit generally sought return of monies and alleged that certain officers and directors of the Company had been overcompensated and/or received improper benefits at the expense of the Company and its shareholders. On September 30, 2010, the District Court dismissed the lawsuit in its entirety with prejudice but granted plaintiff’s request to stay final judgment pending the exhaustion of all appeals in the Berry case, discussed above. On September 23, 2011, the District Court entered Judgment dismissing the case after the Arkansas Supreme Court denied the Berry appeal. The period for any appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has expired.

Accordingly, each of these cases has been concluded.

From time to time, the Company is involved in other litigation relating to claims arising out of the Company’s operations in the normal course of business. This may include litigation with customers, employment related lawsuits, class action lawsuits, purported class action lawsuits and actions brought by governmental authorities. As of December 6, 2011, the Company is not a party to any legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

*Item 1A. Risk Factors*

There have been no material changes in the information set forth under caption “Item 1A-Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

*Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds*

*Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities*

Period (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased (b) Average Price Paid per Share (c)Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 31, 2011 through August 27, 2011 2,917,824 $ 42.40 2,917,824 $ 126,281,224
August 28, 2011 through October 1, 2011 — — — 126,281,224
October 2, 2011 through October 29, 2011 — — — 126,281,224
Total 2,917,824 $ 42.40 2,917,824 $ 126,281,224

29

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='29',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'

Table of Contents

During the nine months ended October 29, 2011, the Company completed the remaining authorization under the 2010 Stock Plan and February 2011 Stock Plan. In May 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $250 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock under the May 2011 Stock Plan.

*Item 6. Exhibits*

Number Description
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
  • Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

*SIGNATURES*

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

DILLARD’S, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: December 6, 2011 /s/ James I. Freeman
James I. Freeman
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

30

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='30',FILE='C:\JMS\105546\11-29553-1\task4998230\29553-1-bg.htm',USER='105546',CD='Dec 7 02:40 2011'