AI assistant
DEXUS — Interim / Quarterly Report 2011
Feb 15, 2011
64807_rns_2011-02-15_92108ae8-783c-4d83-85ff-7dc74801d24d.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [581 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group
ASX release
----- End of picture text -----
16 February 2011
ASX release and presentation for the half year ending 31 December 2010
DEXUS Property Group (DXS), provides the following documents to the ASX Limited:
-
ASX Release – DEXUS Property Group announces improving first half performance; and
-
Presentation – 2011 Half year results presentation and appendices
We have also published the December 2010 DEXUS Property Group property synopsis spread sheet on our web site in the DXS Investor Centre. The property synopsis spread sheet contains details for each property, a Reconciliation of Operating EBIT, FFO and Distribution and other information as at 31 December 2010.
Contacts:
Media Relations
Emma Parry T: (02) 9017 1133 M: 0421 000 329 E: [email protected]
Investor Relations
Daniel Rubinstein T: (02) 9017 1336 M: 0466 016 725 E: [email protected]
Shona Harvey T: (02) 9017 1435 M: 0468 988 420 E: [email protected]
About DEXUS
DEXUS is one of Australia’s leading property groups specialising in world-class office, industrial and retail properties with total assets under management of $13.6bn. In Australia, DEXUS is the number 1 owner/manager of office, a market leader in industrial and, on behalf of third party clients, a leading manager and developer of shopping centres. DEXUS is committed to being a market leader in Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability. www.dexus.com
DEXUS Funds Management Ltd ABN 24 060 920 783, AFSL 238163, as Responsible Entity for DEXUS Property Group (ASX: DXS)
==> picture [572 x 100] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [581 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group (ASX:DXS)
ASX/media release
----- End of picture text -----
16 February 2011
DEXUS Property Group (ASX: DXS) announces improving first half performance
DEXUS Property Group today announced a Net Profit after Tax of $294.4m for the six months ended 31 December 2010, turning from a $107.0m net loss in the previous corresponding period. Funds from Operations (FFO) remained stable at $179.0m for the half year.
RESULTS HIGHLIGHTS
-
Solid half year results: Profit $294.4m
-
Favourable property revaluations: 3% increase in net tangible asset per security to 98 cents
-
Strong capital management: BBB+ rating and conservative gearing of 29.1%
-
Earnings guidance upgrade: FFO per security from 7.3 cents to 7.4 cents
Chief Executive Officer, Victor Hoog Antink said: “Our half year result reflects our focus on maximising performance from our core business, delivering solid fundamentals and overall value increases in line with improving market conditions. We have used the last six months to position the business for further growth as the property cycle continues to improve, by enhancing our operating platform.
The quality of our portfolio and strong management focus means DEXUS is well placed to capture the growth in office markets, create further value from our Australian industrial portfolio and benefit from the emerging US upswing. As a result, we are increasing our 2011 full year FFO guidance to 7.4 cents per security.”
FINANCIAL RESULTS
-
FFO $179.0m (Dec 2009: $181.1m)
-
FFO per security 3.7 cents (Dec 2009: 3.8 cents)
-
Operating EBIT $219.8m (Dec 2009: $240.5m)
-
Distribution per security 2.59 cents (Dec 2009: 2.65 cents)
-
Total assets $7.9bn (Dec 2009: $7.8bn)
Chief Financial Officer, Craig Mitchell said: “The headline numbers reported this period reflect prior period transactions and mask broad-based improvements across the business. FFO per security of 3.7 cents increased over the immediate preceding six month period result of 3.5 cents. When compared with the December 2009 result of 3.8 cents, the slight decline to 3.7 cents primarily reflects the impact of asset sales in late 2009 and early 2010 and the impact of refinancing debt at higher margins. This was offset by stronger income in Australia and the bottoming of US income resulting in positive like for like growth overall in the six months period
Property values increased by 0.9% in the six months to December 2010, building on early cycle improvements. This, together with an improvement in the mark to market derivative position and the contribution of retained earnings, resulted in NTA per security increasing by 3 cents to 98 cents since June 2010.”
==> picture [572 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
1
==> picture [581 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group (ASX:DXS)
ASX/media release
----- End of picture text -----
PORTFOLIO HIGHLIGHTS
Key portfolio metrics:
| PORTFOLIO HIGHLIGHTS Key portfolio metrics: |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office | Industrial | Industrial US | Total~~2~~ | |
| Occupancy % | 96.5 | 97.4 | 86.4 | 90.0 |
| Tenant retention % | 76 | 71 | 65 | n/a |
| WALE(years) | 5.6 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 5.1 |
| Like-for-like growth % | 3.1 | 1.4 | (8.31) | 0.3 |
| Average cap rate % | 7.5 | 8.7 | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Sqm under development | 90,000 | 79,206 | - | 169,206 |
~~1~~ US Net Operating Income (NOI) decreased when compared to the six months ended December 2009, primarily as a result of asset sales and a decrease in like-for-like income. Rental levels appear to have bottomed with like for like NOI being 0.6% higher than in the immediately preceding six month period ended June 2010.
2 Includes Europe.
Note: Queensland floods
The floods in Queensland partially affected three of our properties in the Brisbane area (two industrial properties at Donkin Street, West End and Balham Road, Archerfield, and our office development at 123 Albert Street, Brisbane CBD). For the industrial properties all costs, including repairs, are covered by comprehensive flood insurance. At 123 Albert Street, the flood impact has caused a delay in practical completion from February to June 2011 but all costs, other than the capitalised interest cost associated with the delay, are covered by the construction and insurance contracts.
OPERATING RESULTS
Office
-
Portfolio value $4.3bn (Dec 2009: $4.0bn)
-
Like-for-like NOI growth 3.1% (Dec 2009: 2.7%)
-
Occupancy (by area) 96.5% (Dec 2009: 95.8%)
-
Lease duration (by income) 5.6 years (Dec 2009: 5.4 years)
Our office portfolio produced solid results outperforming market benchmarks to deliver higher occupancy, lower incentive costs and higher portfolio total returns. NOI increased over the period to $127.2m (Dec 2009: $121.9m). Like for like NOI reflected rental growth which was achieved through fixed rental increases of approximately 3.75% on over 80% of leases. Occupancy increased to 96.5% with more than 40 new leases for approximately 31,000sqm signed with an average rental increase of 3.0%. We reduced tenant incentives to an average of 18.0% (June 2010: 20.5%).
Our two 6 star Green Star premium office developments are progressing and are nearing completion. 123 Albert Street, Brisbane (DEXUS share 100%: $376m) is estimated to complete in June 2011, following delays as a result of the recent floods in Queensland (refer above). The development is currently 80% leased and the fully leased yield on cost is now forecast to be 6.75%. 1 Bligh Street, Sydney (DEXUS share 33%: $222m) is scheduled for completion in June 2011 and is 55% leased. Leasing interest in the building has continued to pick up with general market conditions improving and progress on development enabling tenants to tour available floors. Fully leased yield on cost is forecast at 7.0%.
==> picture [572 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
2
==> picture [581 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group (ASX:DXS)
ASX/media release
----- End of picture text -----
The $26m redevelopment of Southgate in Melbourne is progressing on track with completion due in November 2011. In addition, we have lodged development approvals on two additional Melbourne properties for a 18,500sqm office development at Flinders Gate car park and on behalf of DEXUS Wholesale Property Fund (DWPF) a 20,000sqm office development at 360 Collins Street.
Industrial
-
Portfolio value $1.6bn (Dec 2009: $1.5bn)
-
Like for like NOI growth 1.4% (Dec 2009: 1.9%)
-
Occupancy (by area) 97.4% (Dec 2009: 97.7%)
-
Lease duration (by income) 4.5 years (Dec 2009: 4.7 years)
Our Australian industrial portfolio continued to deliver consistent performance during the first half of the year. In line with our forecast improvements in industrial market conditions, we reweighted a portion of our portfolio to higher returning value-add opportunities; selling $15.4m of stabilised properties above book value and investing into $38m of trading activity, land subdivision and speculative build opportunities.
NOI increased to $56.8m (Dec 2009: $52.7m) primarily as a result of accretive asset recycling in the prior period and improvements in like for like income. During the period 49 new leasing deals representing 62,675sqm of existing industrial space were completed. The portfolio experienced average rental reviews of 3.3% across 37% of the portfolio and a decrease of 5.6% in new lease rates. Average tenant incentives decreased to 4.4% (June 2010: 6.1%).
Good progress was made in recycling our development land bank including Laverton VIC, where the preleased development to Loscam for a 6,534sqm warehouse facility remains on track for completion in June 2011. The development, with a cost including land of $10m, has a forecast yield on total cost of 9.0%. In addition, a $14m speculative development for a 17,347sqm warehouse was commenced during the period. Completion is expected in August 2011 with good preliminary interest.
Greystanes, NSW is now 25% pre-committed. The pre-lease development for Solaris Paper is completed and the Symbion Pharmacy Services development will complete later in February 2011. Both developments will provide a return on cost of 8.7%. The $32m pre-lease development with Fujitsu remains on track for completion in October 2011.
In August 2010 we acquired a 7.6ha development site in Erskine Park NSW for $15.9m and we have secured development approval to subdivide. We are constructing a 21,000sqm warehouse on half of the site, which will be completed in October 2011, and we intend to sell the remaining 3.5ha.
Industrial - US
-
Portfolio value US$1.3bn or A$1.3bn (Dec 2009: US$1.2bn or A$1.4bn)
-
Like for like NOI down 8.3% (Dec 2009: down 10.8%)
-
Occupancy (by area) 86.4% (Dec 2009: 87.8%)
-
Lease duration (by income) 4.7 years (Dec 2009: 4.7 years)
During the period NOI, decreased to US$39.4m (Dec 2009: US$46.9m) but on a like for like basis was 0.6% higher than in the preceding six month period ended June 2010, signalling the recovery is underway with increasing income as market rental rates stabilise. The decrease in NOI was primarily related to the sale of $259.1m of assets ($220.7m in late calendar year 2009 and $38.4m in late calendar year 2010) together with an 8.3% decrease in like for like NOI as a result of new lease rates being 8% lower than expiring lease rates and a softening in occupancy.
==> picture [572 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
3
==> picture [581 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group (ASX:DXS)
ASX/media release
----- End of picture text -----
Markets across the US are stabilising, with the emergence of a variable speed economy. While many inland markets are beginning to stabilise, vacancy remains high. Property values across the US have continued to increase over the last six months in anticipation of improving underlying market conditions and low US interest rates. While coastal markets have seen the greatest increase, the rise has been more tempered in DEXUS’s non-core markets.
Further progress has been made in repositioning towards core markets with the exit from Harrisburg completed during the period. Significant progress has also been achieved in the management of the core portfolio with DEXUS’s US team assuming control of the $650m core west coast and Whirlpool portfolios. RREEF continues to manage the remaining $620m of properties located in non-core markets.
Since 1 January 2011, our US team has leased or is in negotiation for leases covering 610,000sqft. Half of the leases are in relation to renewals and represent 100% retention of leases due for expiry. The other half are leases on space which is currently vacant and represents 1.2% of total US portfolio square footage.
Non-core property portfolios – European industrial
The European portfolio is valued at €132m or A$173m (Dec 2009: €133m or A$213m), contributing €5.8m (Dec 2009: €6.0m) or 3.5% of the Group’s NOI with occupancy (by area) at 84.7% (Dec 2009: 87.8%). As transaction markets in Europe start to open up, it is expected that these properties will be sold over the short to medium term.
Funds Management
DEXUS operates a vertically integrated platform which also services third party funds and generates asset and development management income. We are seeking to expand our core funds management platform to leverage the forecast upswing in wholesale demand for direct property.
Our $6.1bn funds management platform is primarily made up of DWPF, two Australian mandates totalling $2.6bn and in the US, DEXUS manages $0.3bn of industrial real estate on behalf of five clients.
DWPF has total assets of $3.2bn. The portfolio outperformed the total return benchmark over one and three years, with a total return of 11% for the last 12 months. DEXUS has undertaken significant activity on behalf of DWPF including achieving an A (stable) rating by S&P, acquiring $256m of industrial property and securing $765m of equity, of which approximately $245m is new capital and the remainder transfers.
Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability
DEXUS continues to drive sustainable performance with improvements in resource consumption and progress in our 4.5 star NABERS Energy rating program. The Group’s two 6 Star Green Star office developments are progressing to completion in June 2011 and we continued to progress sustainability innovation in our industrial business with environmentally sustainable design features incorporated into our new developments at Greystanes.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
DEXUS continues to maintain a strong balance sheet and has increased the diversification of our funding sources. Average maturity of our debt sources was improved to 3.4 years. Gearing remained stable at 29.1% and we continue to maintain credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s of BBB+ and Moody’s of Baa1. In recognition of the conservative gearing and continued high cost of equity, DEXUS suspended the distribution reinvestment program (DRP) during the period.
==> picture [572 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
4
==> picture [581 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group (ASX:DXS)
ASX/media release
----- End of picture text -----
Chief Financial Officer, Craig Mitchell said: “We aim to be conservative in the use of new equity. The suspension of the DRP reflects the sustainability of our distribution policy, our comfortable level of gearing and the discount at which our equity is being priced in the market.”
OUTLOOK
Our office portfolio, representing approximately 59% of book value, is expected to deliver consistent underlying growth as we increase face rents and incentives decrease further. We will continue to actively manage the core portfolio to extract additional growth as we reduce occupancy marginally to expose more of the portfolio to the forecast improvement in leasing conditions. We will further progress our new development applications and identify additional development opportunities.
The industrial portfolio, representing approximately 22% of book value, is expected to continue to provide stable underlying income. As the property cycle improves, we will continue to allocate up to 20% of our industrial portfolio to value-add opportunities including land subdivision, trading and speculative development and continue to further develop and recycle our two prime industrial land banks.
The US industrial portfolio, representing approximately 17% of book value, is expected to benefit from the cyclical recovery following recent weak economic conditions particularly in our core west coast markets. While the outlook for medium term growth appears robust, it is expected the portfolio will experience mixed but positive growth in the near term.
We will continue to enhance our funds management platform and provide opportunities for capital partnering and increased fee income for DXS.
Barring adverse changes to operating conditions, the forecast earnings (FFO) for the year ending 30 June 2011 has been upgraded to 7.4 cents per security. Consequently, distributions, being 70% of FFO, are forecast to be 5.18 cents per security.
Contacts:
Media Relations Investor Relations Emma Parry T: (02) 9017 1133 Daniel Rubinstein T: (02) 9017 1336 M: 0421 000 329 M: 0466 016 725 E: [email protected] E: [email protected]
Shona Harvey T: (02) 9017 1435 M: 0468 988 420 E: [email protected]
About DEXUS
DEXUS is one of Australia’s leading property groups specialising in world-class office, industrial and retail properties with total assets under management of $13.6bn. In Australia, DEXUS is the number 1 owner/manager of office, a market leader in industrial and, on behalf of third party clients, a leading manager and developer of shopping centres. DEXUS is committed to being a market leader in Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability. www.dexus.com
DEXUS Funds Management Ltd ABN 24 060 920 783, AFSL 238163, as Responsible Entity for DEXUS Property Group (ASX: DXS)
==> picture [572 x 98] intentionally omitted <==
5
2011 DEXUS Property Group HALF YEAR RESULTS PRESENTATION
DEXUS Funds Management Limited ABN 24 060 920 783 DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 1 AFSL 238163 as responsible entity for DEXUS Property Group
DEXUS HY11 RESULTS
� Victor Hoog Antink, CEO
-
Key financial outcomes
-
DEXUS platform
-
Craig Mitchell, CFO
-
Financial performance
-
Funds Management
-
Paul Say, CIO
-
Portfolio overview
-
Office portfolio
-
US industrial portfolio
-
Andrew Whiteside, Head of Industrial
-
Industrial portfolio
-
Victor Hoog Antink, CEO
-
Outlook
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 2
HIGHLIGHTS
� Solid half year results
� Increases in property values
� Effective capital management
� Increased focus on management targets
� Increase earnings and distribution guidance
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 3
KEY FINANCIAL OUTCOMES Results supporting guidance upgrade
| Dec 2009 | 6 months to | Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 2010 | |||
| Key financial metrics | |||
| FFO1 | 3.8c | 3.5c | 3.7c |
| Distribution1 | 2.65c | 2.45c | 2.59c |
| Operating EBIT | $240.5m | $220.8m | $219.8m |
| Gearing | 31.9% | 29.8% | 29.1% |
| NTA per security | $0.95 | $0.95 | $0.98 |
| Key portfolio metrics | |||
| Occupancy (by area) | 91.2% | 89.9% | 90.0% |
| WALE (by income) years | 5.0 | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Like-for-like growth | (0.3%) | (2.3%) | 0.3% |
| FFO guidance |
-
Upgrade FY11 guidance: 7.4 cents[2] per security
-
Cents per security. 2. Barring unforseen circumstances.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 4
DEXUS PLATFORM The business
==> picture [678 x 339] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
SECTOR STRATEGIC FOCUS FUM $13.6bn [1] TARGET
Office Prime in major CBD’s: core/core+ $4.3 60%
Property Industrial Stable core with value add $1.6 20%
Industrial — US Repositioning towards West Coast $1.3 20%
Funds
Funds Leveraging DXS management $6.1 ROE
management
Conservative capital management
Funding &
Capital strong governance, transparency
business risk
and risk management
People
----- End of picture text -----
- Includes Europe, Syndicate, cash and other.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 5
DEXUS PLATFORM Office
Investment discipline
-
Core core plus investment
-
Prime quality properties in major CBD markets
-
Incremental growth through development, refurbishment and asset management
Achievements
-
Like-for-like in line with market
-
Outperformance of operational and total return benchmarks
-
Developments
-
Sydney (Bligh St) and Brisbane (Albert St) completing (DXS share: $598 million)
-
Two new DA’s in Melbourne
==> picture [274 x 184] intentionally omitted <==
Targets
-
Core portfolio >9% IRR
-
Outperform through asset management and recycling
-
Developments: up to 15% of FUM >15% IRR
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 6
DEXUS PLATFORM Industrial
Investment discipline
-
Stable core portfolio (80%) & value add (20%)
-
Enhanced growth through development, trading and asset recycling
-
Key locations
Achievements
-
Consistent operational performance (like-for-like 1.4%)
-
Acquisitions, property sales and new DA’s ($83m total balance sheet activity)
-
Expanding footprint in key markets
==> picture [275 x 184] intentionally omitted <==
Targets
-
Core portfolio 80% of FUM >10% IRR
-
Outperform through asset management and recycling
-
Value add up to 20% of FUM:
-
Trading activity: >15% IRR
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 7
DEXUS PLATFORM US Industrial
Investment discipline
-
Core/value add
-
Focus on four key West Coast markets
-
Local expertise — focused approach
Achievements
-
Operational outcomes
-
Established management platform
-
Internalised management of core portfolio complete ($0.7bn of $1.3bn)
-
Portfolio transition
==> picture [304 x 231] intentionally omitted <==
-
Sold/contracted $61m of non-core assets above book value
-
$41m of new investments in key markets
Targets
-
Increase occupancy >91% by 2013 (1H11 86.4%)
-
Portfolio transition to core markets: 24 mths
-
Core returns >8.5% IRR
-
Expected returns next 3 years: 10%–15%
-
Developments >15% IRR
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 8
DEXUS PLATFORM Funds under management
Investment discipline
-
Diversified product offering
-
Leverage DXS management platform
-
Institutional capital to deliver enhanced returns
Achievements
-
DWPF $765m new equity, $250m debt financing, $256m new investments
-
Returns outperformed benchmarks
-
Retail syndicate property sold
-
Good corporate governance
Targets
==> picture [274 x 184] intentionally omitted <==
-
Continue top quartile outperformance of relevant benchmarks
-
Support investor plans for growth and diversification
-
Expect FUM increase 30% within 5 years
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 9
DEXUS PLATFORM Funding and business risk
Investment discipline
-
Target gearing <40%
-
Diversity of debt by source and duration
-
Strong and transparent balance sheet
-
Strong governance, transparency, and business risk mitigation
Achievements
-
Debt
-
Refinanced $475m
-
Improved debt diversification
-
Increased debt duration
Targets
==> picture [226 x 164] intentionally omitted <==
-
Maintain BBB+ rating and outlook
-
Maintain debt diversity
-
Extend debt duration to 4 years
-
$600m debt refinancing in CY11
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 10
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY & SUSTAINABILITY Committed to being a market leader
� Environment
-
6 Star Green Star developments nearing completion
-
4.5 star NABERS program on track
-
Resource consumption trending downward
-
Future proofing our portfolio with prudent risk management including climate change assessments
-
Sustainability innovation in AU and US industrial developments
� Community
- Community engagement a key part of our culture
==> picture [264 x 299] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 11
DEXUS PLATFORM People
Our approach
-
High performance culture
-
Preferred employer in the property sector
Achievements
-
Realigned Executive team
-
Established US DEXUS team
-
Increased head count in key value-add areas
==> picture [321 x 274] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 12
TITLE SLIDE HEADER FINANCIAL Sub title (Trebuchet 18 pt) PERFORMANCE Victor Hoog AntinkCraig Mitchell Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
DXS 2009 Annual Results — Slide 13
FINANCIAL RESULTS AT A GLANCE
| Dec 2009 | Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’m | $’m | |
| Operating EBIT | 240.5 | 219.8 |
| Finance costs | (68.1) | (48.5) |
| Fair value movements | (315.8) | 126.0 |
| Deferred tax | 31.7 | (1.2) |
| Other | 4.7 | (1.7) |
| Statutory profit/(loss) | (107.0) | 294.4 |
| Jun 2010 | Dec 2010 | |
| $’m | $’m | |
| Real estate investment | 7,307 | 7,343 |
| Interest bearing liabilities | (2,240) | (2,178) |
| Other | (61) | 11 |
| Less: RENTS | (204) | (204) |
| Less: intangible assets | (226) | (225) |
| Net tangible assets | 4,576 | 4,747 |
| NTAper security | 95c | 98c |
Note: refer to detailed income reconciliation in the Appendices.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 14
CORE OPERATING METRICS Underlying improvements in all sectors
| Dec 2009 | 6 months to | Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| $’m | June 2010 | $’m | |
| $’m | |||
| Office | 121.9 | 123.2 | 127.2 |
| Industrial | 52.7 | 57.2 | 56.8 |
| Industrial — US1 | 54.0 | 46.2 | 45.0 |
| Non-core1,2 | 18.6 | 12.5 | 9.6 |
| Currency impact on NOI | — | (1.9) | (4.9) |
| Management EBIT | 6.3 | (0.2) | 1.5 |
| Eliminations/other | (13.0) | (16.2) | (15.4) |
| Operating EBIT | 240.5 | 220.8 | 219.8 |
| Finance costs | (68.1) | (59.6) | (53.0) |
| Currency impact on finance costs | — | 1.8 | 4.5 |
| Cash and fit-out incentive amortisation | 15.1 | 15.3 | 14.3 |
| RENTS | (4.7) | (5.8) | (6.2) |
| Other | (1.7) | (3.6) | (0.4) |
| Funds from Operations(FFO) | 181.1 | 168.9 | 179.0 |
| FFOper security | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.7 |
-
Constant currency: refer to Appendices for exchange rates.
-
Retail and European industrial.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 15
VALUATIONS
All sectors improving
-
NTA increase 3% to $0.98
-
Retained earnings $54m
-
Mark to market gains $54m
-
Revaluation uplift of $68m
-
Portfolio cap rate decreases 10bps (to 7.9%)
-
30bps in US
-
10bps in Australia
-
==> picture [290 x 176] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 16
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Sustainable and return focused
-
Operating cash flows match distributions
-
Cost of equity and debt continue to be high
-
Suspended DRP
-
Gearing at lower range of target
-
Acquisitions self-funded
-
Future investments to meet high hurdle rates
| $’m | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating cashflows Cashflow from operations1 |
169.0 | |
| Stay in business capital | (48.8) | |
| Distribution | (118.1) | |
| Net surplus/(deficit) Cash retained: DRP Aug 2010 |
2.1 14.5 |
|
| Investing cashflows | ||
| Acquisitions (incl. inventory) | (52.3) | |
| Disposals | 44.9 | |
| Development spend | (199.1) | |
| Net investment activities | (206.5) |
- Excludes capitalised interest, inventory acquisitions and includes RENTS distribution.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 17
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Treasury — strong, stable platform
� Refinanced $475m and reduced headroom
� Duration target: 4 years
==> picture [315 x 265] intentionally omitted <==
� Achieved target bank to non-bank debt mix
| �Achieved target | bank to | non-ban | k debt m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2009 | Jun 2010 | Dec 2010 |
|
| Gearing | 32% | 30% | |
| Headroom | $1.5bn | ||
| Debt duration (years) | 2.8 | ||
| Cost of debt | 6.5%1 | ||
| Bank/non-bank debt | 54%/46% | ||
| Hedged | 90% | 90% |
-
Re-stated to reflect drawn cost of debt.
-
Includes bank commitments received in February 2011
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 18
TITLE SLIDE HEADER FUNDS MANAGEMENT Sub title (Trebuchet 18 pt)
Victor Hoog AntinkCraig Mitchell Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
DXS 2009 Annual Results — Slide 19
WHOLESALE CAPITAL LANDSCAPE Increasing investor demand
==> picture [172 x 218] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
General
trends
DEXUS
position
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [172 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DEXUS
response
----- End of picture text -----
-
Shift of capital to wholesale funds
-
� Sector specific preference from larger institutional investors
-
� International investors seeking core property exposure
-
� DWPF: Pre-eminent diversified wholesale fund ─ Continues to receive positive net inflows
-
─ Superior returns above benchmark
-
─ International investor base (20%) and expected to grow
-
� Vertically integrated platform to service funds
-
� Improve depth and strength of team: appointed new Head of Capital
-
� Build on success with DWPF
-
� Growth from existing and new relationships
-
� Higher risk/return sector specialist development funds
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 20
MANDATES
Area of future growth
� Achievements
-
10 transactions worth $150m in 2010
-
STC outperforms benchmark
-
AXA performance in line with benchmark
� Focus
-
Review outcome of AXA/AMP merger
-
Rebalance STC portfolio
-
Growth from existing and new relationships
==> picture [224 x 218] intentionally omitted <==
| Retail | Office | Industrial | US industrial | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | $1.2bn | $1.0bn | $0.4bn | $0.3bn |
| Occupancy | 98.8% | 92.7% | 93.2% | 97.3% |
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 21
DEXUS WHOLESALE PROPERTY FUND Significant activity
About DWPF
-
$3.2bn pre-eminent diversified wholesale fund (<50 investors)
-
27 properties: weighted cap rate 7.05%
Focus
-
Complete equity raising: $245m to date
-
Maintain index outperformance
-
Initiate retail/office developments
-
Standard & Poor’s A (stable) rated
-
Portfolio occupancy 96%
-
Gearing 22%
Achievements
-
New equity/transfers of $765m
-
Completed MTN issue $250m
-
Acquired $256m industrial assets yield 9%
-
Outperformed benchmark over 1 & 3 years
==> picture [222 x 208] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 22
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
Paul Say Chief Investment Officer
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 23
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
Australia — entering a growth phase
Office
-
Entering growth phase
-
Real office rents rising
-
Opportunities
-
Hold line on incentive levels
Industrial
-
Rents and occupancy stable through GFC
-
Industrial markets now undersupplied
-
Opportunities
- Increase active investments
-
Expose portfolio to improving market
-
Repositioning/redevelopment opportunity
==> picture [269 x 171] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [209 x 167] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 24
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW United States and Europe
- “Variable speed” recovery
==> picture [393 x 237] intentionally omitted <==
-
Strong growth in core markets, non-core markets lagging
-
Transactions markets opening up
-
Recovery underway
-
Occupancy in 2011/12
-
Rents in 2012/13
-
Europe
-
Selling down through 2011
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 25
| PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW | PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance — diversification benefits and | improving outlook | |||||
| Office | Industrial | Industrial US | Total1 | |||
| Occupancy % (area) | 96.5 | 97.4 | 86.4 | 90.0 | ||
| Tenant retention % | 76 | 71 | 65 | n/a | ||
| WALE (years) | 5.6 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 5.1 | ||
| Like-for-like growth % | 3.1 | 1.4 | (8.3) | 0.3 | ||
| Average cap rate % | 7.5 | 8.7 | 8.1 | 7.9 | ||
| 3 year total return %2 | 2.2 | 2.5 | (1.7) | n/a | ||
| 3 year benchmark %2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | (5.4) | n/a | ||
| Sqm under development | 90,000 | 79,206 | — | 169,206 | ||
| 1. Includes Europe. |
||||||
| 2. Source: IPD index as at September 2010 for office/industrial and NCREIF as at 31 December |
2010 for industrial US. | |||||
| DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 26 |
OFFICE PORTFOLIO
Paul Say Chief Investment Officer
==> picture [720 x 121] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 27
OFFICE Highlights
� Consistent operational performance
-
Leasing success 30,945sqm
-
Occupancy and returns above benchmark
-
Integrated model drives value improving:
-
Tenant satisfaction
-
Portfolio performance
-
Short-medium term metrics all positive
==> picture [276 x 181] intentionally omitted <==
-
Outperforming total return
-
Like-for-like 3.1%
� Total return above benchmark
- Valuations up
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 28
OFFICE
Portfolio fundamentals
� Income up
— NOI $127.2m
-
Robust like-for-like up 3.1%
-
Retention at 76%[1]
� Value and risk
-
Occupancy strong at 96.5%
-
WALE up to 5.6 years
==> picture [351 x 188] intentionally omitted <==
- Cap rates firmed to 7.5%
� DEXUS outperforms benchmark[2]
- 60bps in NSW and 50bps entire portfolio (3 years)
| 1 year | 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DXS NSW Office | 6.1% | 1.5% | 7.9% | |
| IPD Benchmark2 | 6.3% | 0.9% | 7.2% |
-
Rolling 12 months by area.
-
Benchmark: IPD NSW Office index as at September 2010. Source: Jones Lang LaSalle direct vacancy.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 29
OFFICE
Leasing results underpin outperformance
� Leasing demand up
� Average fixed increases 3.75%
� Leasing (new and renewals)
— 44 Market Street leased at lower incentives
- Southgate, 3 floors leased
| Number of leases1 | 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Area leased2 | 30,945 sqm | |
| Average rental increase2 | 3% | |
| Average tenant incentive3 | 18% | |
| Average fixed increase | 3.75%–4% | |
| Current vacancy by income | 3% |
- Tenant incentives down to 18% from 20.5%
==> picture [334 x 178] intentionally omitted <==
Looking forward 2011
� On track to deliver
-
75% of income at risk contracted (FY11)
-
Woodside market review — benefit FY12
-
40,336sqm at 100% level. Includes vacancies, new deals and renewals.
-
Excludes development leasing.
-
Gross incentives: new tenants 22.8%, renewals 13.6%. Tenant incentives were given on 32 of 41 transactions averaging 19.9%. Across the 41 transactions, including those where no incentive was given, the average was 18.0%.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 30
OFFICE
Developments — new projects enhance portfolio quality
-
123 Albert Street, Brisbane 38,000sqm (DXS 100%:$376m[1] )
-
Completion delayed due to floods: estimated June 2011
-
80% pre-committed
-
Forecast yield at cost of 6.75% (fully leased)
-
1 Bligh Street, Sydney 43,000sqm (DXS 33%:$222m[1] )
-
On track for completion in June 2011
-
55% leased. Proposals on remaining floors — only new significant premium space in Sydney in 2011
-
Forecast yield on cost of 7.0% (fully leased)
-
Focus on single floor tenants
==> picture [101 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
1 Bligh Street, Sydney, NSW
----- End of picture text -----
- Total project costs.
==> picture [264 x 410] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 31
OFFICE
Key deliverables
-
Top quartile total returns
-
Target >9% IRR
-
Tougher stance on incentives
-
Increase active (core plus) revenues
-
Redeploy up to 15% of office “balance sheet”
-
Activate development pipeline
-
Flinders Gate 18,500sqm
-
360 Collins Street 20,000sqm (DWPF)
-
IRR target 15%-20%
-
-
Acquire assets for repositioning
- IRR target 10-15%
201 Elizabeth Street, Sydney, NSW
==> picture [266 x 399] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 32
TITLE SLIDE HEADER US INDUSTRIAL Sub title (Trebuchet 18 pt) PORTFOLIO
Victor Hoog AntinkPaul Say Chief Executive OfficerChief Investment Officer
DXS 2009 Annual Results — Slide 33
US INDUSTRIAL Highlights
� Strength in management platform
-
High calibre local team
-
$800m portfolio under direct management
� Traction in repositioning
-
$61m property sales above book yielding 1.4%
-
$41m acquisitions yielding 8.3%
� Total return above benchmark
-
Valuations up
-
Fundamentals improving
==> picture [330 x 315] intentionally omitted <==
13602 12[th] Street, Chino, CA
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 34
US INDUSTRIAL
Portfolio fundamentals — data supports turning market
� Income in line with expectation
-
Like-for-like down 8% but improving
-
Up 0.6% on six months to June 2010
-
Tenant retention 65%
-
Net operating income $41.6m
� Value and risk
— Cap rates firm at 8.1%
==> picture [301 x 177] intentionally omitted <==
- WALE up to 4.7 years
— Occupancy at 86.4%
-
DEXUS outperforms benchmark
-
370bps over NCREIF 3 year return
| 1 year | 3 years | 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DXS US Industrial | 12.8% | (1.7%) | 5.1% | |
| NCREIF1 | 9.4% | (5.4%) | 2.6% |
- As at 31 December 2010.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 35
US INDUSTRIAL Variable speed economy drives core portfolio leasing
HY11
| 11 Occupancy stabilised as leasing conditions improve — Core markets strengthening first — Secondary markets still challenging |
Number of leases1 67 |
|---|---|
| Area leased 1.5msf |
|
| Average rental movement (8%) |
|
| Average tenant incentive2 9% |
|
| Average fixed increase 2%-3% |
|
| Current vacancy by income 12.6% |
-
Occupancy stabilised as leasing conditions improve
-
Incentives dropping
-
Smart leasing supports sales
Looking forward 2011
-
Occupancy to increase in 2011
-
Rent growth expected through 2012
==> picture [342 x 178] intentionally omitted <==
-
Includes vacancies, new deals and renewals.
-
Gross incentives.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 36
US INDUSTRIAL Key deliverables
� People
� Portfolio repositioning
-
Build “best in class” asset management team
-
Disciplined buying in core markets
� Above benchmark total return
-
Ensure inherent value in non-core portfolio realised
-
Deliver 8.5% total return
-
Drive occupancy and earnings prior to sale
-
Outperform NCREIF benchmark
==> picture [720 x 140] intentionally omitted <==
Golden Pacific Business Park, 1100 Hatcher & 17524-17531 Railroad Street, City of Industry, CA
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 37
TITLE SLIDE HEADER INDUSTRIAL PORTFOLIO Sub title (Trebuchet 18 pt)
Andrew WhitesideVictor Hoog Antink Chief Executive OfficerHead of Industrial
DXS 2009 Annual Results — Slide 38
INDUSTRIAL
Highlights — active period
� Consistent operational performance
-
Leasing success 103,000sqm[1]
-
Occupancy and returns above benchmark
-
Recycling capital to drive growth
-
2 non-core property sales underway for $39m
-
Acquired 2 value add properties for $38m
-
Increased development activity
-
98,000sqm completed and underway
-
30% of land bank now active
==> picture [308 x 216] intentionally omitted <==
� Expanded footprint in key markets
-
Acquisition for DWPF: 14 properties $269m[2]
-
Enhancing specialist industrial team
-
63,000sqm in DXS, 40,000sqm in the third party portfolio.
-
Includes acquisition costs.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 39
INDUSTRIAL
Portfolio fundamentals — relative outperformance
-
Consistent income with built in growth
-
NOI $56.8m
-
Like-for-like income growth 1.4%
-
Effective rents above market
-
Strong operational performance
-
Occupancy out-performing market 97.4%
-
Tenant retention 71%
-
WALE steady at 4.5yrs
-
Capital values contributing to returns
==> picture [309 x 208] intentionally omitted <==
-
Up 0.6% YTD[2] , led by Melbourne
-
Average cap rate firmed, 8.7%
-
Total return for 1H11 4.9% up on 2.5% for 1H10
| 1 | year | 3 | years | 5 | years | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DXS industrial | 8.3% | 2.5% | 7.7% | ||||
| IPD Benchmark | 7.1% | 1.6% | 6.8% |
- 12 month rolling returns for stabilised portfolio at 31 December 2010. 2. Stabilised portfolio. Sources: Total returns: IPD Industrial Index as at September 2010 preliminary and return contribution: Savills Industrial Stock Survey 1H2010.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 40
INDUSTRIAL
Leasing emphasis: from de-risking to exposure to market
Good leasing success
-
25% to new tenants, half long dated vacancy
-
Capturing effective growth in new rents, leasing costs reduced
Looking forward 2011
| Number of leases | 49 | |
|---|---|---|
| Area leased | 62,675 | |
| Average rental change Average tenant incentive1 |
(5.6%) 4.4% |
|
| Average fixed increase | ||
| (in existing portfolio) | 3.3% | |
| Current vacancy by income | 3.0% |
-
42% of FY11 expiries leased — Income largely de-risked
-
86% of vacancy concentrated on two sub-markets
-
Retain strong passing income with contributions from development book
==> picture [333 x 178] intentionally omitted <==
- Tenant incentives were given on 17 of 49 transactions. Across the 49 transactions the average was 4.4%.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 41
INDUSTRIAL
Increased activity
==> picture [350 x 180] intentionally omitted <==
-
Land bank active, 42ha now employed, one-third being sold
-
Development book now 98,000sqm
-
60% preleased
-
Value add initiatives
-
Archerfield acquired on short WALE, below replacement cost
==> picture [344 x 180] intentionally omitted <==
- Erskine Park subdivided to 3 lots, 21,000sqm spec DA, construction commenced
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 42
INDUSTRIAL
Key deliverables — leverage momentum
� Enhance leadership position
-
Leverage core and value add management capability
-
Sustainability innovation
� Investment portfolio
-
Expand platform in key markets, build scale for DXS and funds management initiatives
-
Continue to reposition portfolio by selling non-core assets, recycle capital, finalise asset sales
==> picture [302 x 179] intentionally omitted <==
Templar Road, Erskine Park, NSW
- Deliver consistent returns >10%
� Active development business (up to 20% FUM)
-
Build out development pipeline and replenish
-
Continue to work land bank, including sales
-
Increase trading activity, 15% IRR
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 43
OUTLOOK
Victor Hoog Antink Chief Executive Officer
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 44
MARKET POSITION AND OUTLOOK Positive fundamentals
� Office
-
Demand improving and limited near term supply
-
Stronger effective rent growth expected
� Industrial
-
Limited market availability, emerging supply
-
Expected capital growth
-
US industrial — stabilising
-
Net demand positive
-
Stronger rent growth from 2012
-
Capital and funds
-
Significant wholesale investor demand
-
Interest margins high but decreasing
GPT and Gateway buildings, Sydney, NSW
==> picture [274 x 232] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [274 x 231] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 45
2011 FOCUS AND GUIDANCE
DEXUS focus
-
Continue to drive portfolio returns harder
-
Identify office development pipeline
-
Increase industrial active business allocation
-
Increase US occupancy
-
Third party: respond to wholesale investor demand
-
Tactical reduction in funding costs
Guidance[1]
-
Upgrade FY11 FFO per security: 7.4 cents
-
Distribution per security[2] : 5.18 cents
-
Barring unforeseen circumstances.
-
FFO payout ratio 70%.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 46
2011 DEXUS Property Group HALF YEAR RESULTS APPENDICES
DEXUS Funds Management Limited ABN 24 060 920 783 DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 47 AFSL 238163 as responsible entity for DEXUS Property Group
INDEX
| Statutory profit breakdown | 49 |
|---|---|
| Profit to Funds From Operations reconciliation | 50 |
| Management business EBIT | 51 |
| Interest reconciliation | 52 |
| Statement of financial position | 53 |
| Net asset value composition | 54 |
| Valuations: metrics and revaluations | 55 |
| Developments | 57 |
| Acquisitions | 59 |
| Disposals | 60 |
| Debt and financial risk management | 61 |
| Portfolio composition | 67 |
| Office portfolio | 68 |
| Industrial portfolio | 74 |
| Industrial US portfolio | 79 |
| Industrial Europe portfolio | 84 |
| FX rates | 86 |
| Glossary | 87 |
| Important information | 88 |
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 48appendices — Slide 48
STATUTORY PROFIT BREAKDOWN
| $’m | NOI | Mgmt | Internal | Other | Net | RENTS |
Current | Deferred | Revals/ | Elims | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| income | mgmt | income & | finance | dist’n |
tax | tax | MTM gain | consolidated | |||
| fees | expenses | costs | on sale | Dec 10 | |||||||
| Revenue from ordinary activities | |||||||||||
| Propertyrevenue | 313.9 | 0.6 | (0.1) | 314.4 | |||||||
| Management fees | 45.4 | (17.2) | 28.2 | ||||||||
| Interest revenue | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||||||
| Net fair valuegain of derivatives | 1.9 | 1.9 | |||||||||
| Net foreign exchangegain | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||||||||
| Share of net profits of associates accounted for using the equitymethod |
12.9 | 12.9 | |||||||||
| Net fair valuegain of investmentproperties | 55.0 | 55.0 | |||||||||
| Netgain on sale of investmentproperties | 4.7 | 4.7 | |||||||||
| Other income | 0.6 | 0.6 | |||||||||
| Total income | 313.9 | 46.0 | — | 1.1 | 0.7 | — | — | — | 74.5 | (17.3) | 418.9 |
| Expenses | |||||||||||
| Propertyexpenses | (80.2) | (0.1) | 5.0 | (75.3) | |||||||
| Internal Responsible Entityfees | (11.8) | 11.8 | — | ||||||||
| Finance costs | (49.2) | 51.6 | 2.4 | ||||||||
| Depreciation | (1.2) | (1.2) | |||||||||
| Impairment | (0.1) | (0.1) | |||||||||
| Employee related expenses | (36.1) | (36.1) | |||||||||
| Other expenses | (7.1) | (4.7) | 0.5 | (11.3) | |||||||
| Total expenses | (80.2) | (44.5) | (11.8) | (4.7) | (49.2) | — | — | — | 51.5 | 17.3 | (121.6) |
| Profit before tax | 233.7 | 1.5 | (11.8) | (3.6) | (48.5) | — | — | — | 126.0 | — | 297.3 |
| Tax expense | |||||||||||
| Income tax benefit | (0.1) | 3.1 | 3.0 | ||||||||
| Withholdingtax expense | (0.7) | (4.3) | (5.0) | ||||||||
| Total tax benefit/(expense) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (0.8) | (1.2) | — | — | (2.0) |
| Netprofit attributable to other non-controllinginterests | (0.9) | (0.9) | |||||||||
| Netprofit | 233.7 | 1.5 | (11.8) | (3.6) | (48.5) | (0.9) | (0.8) | (1.2) | 126.0 | — | 294.4 |
| Operating EBIT (slide 14 & 15) | = 219.8 | Other (slide 14) = (1.7) |
Refer to reconciliation in the Property Synopsis at http://www.dexus.com/investor/dxs_reports.aspx?id=r&cur=reports&type=property_synopsis for full details.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 49appendices — Slide 49
PROFIT TO FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS RECONCILIATION
| $’m | Group | Property | MTM | P/L on sale | Deferred | Depr’n & | RENTS | Straight | Other | Funds From |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| consolidated | revals/ | derivs | of invest | tax | amort’n | capital | line rent | Operations | ||
| Dec 10 | impairm’t | prop | dist’n | adjust | (FFO) | |||||
| Revenue from ordinary activities | ||||||||||
| Propertyrevenue | 314.4 | 14.3 | 0.2 | 328.9 | ||||||
| Management fees | 28.2 | 28.2 | ||||||||
| Interestrevenue | 0.7 | (0.7) | — | |||||||
| Netfair value gainofderivatives | 1.9 | (1.9) | — | |||||||
| Netforeignexchange gain | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Share of net profits of associates accounted for using the equitymethod |
12.9 | (12.9) | — | |||||||
| Netfair value gainof investment properties | 55.0 | (55.0) | — | |||||||
| Net gainonsale of investment properties | 4.7 | (4.7) | — | |||||||
| Other income | 0.6 | 0.6 | ||||||||
| Total income | 418.9 | (67.9) | (1.9) | (4.7) | — | 14.3 | — | 0.2 | (0.7) | 358.2 |
| Expenses | ||||||||||
| Property expenses | (75.3) | (75.3) | ||||||||
| Finance costs | 2.4 | (51.6) | 0.7 | (48.5) | ||||||
| Depreciation | (1.2) | (1.2) | ||||||||
| Impairment | (0.1) | 0.1 | — | |||||||
| Employeerelated expenses | (36.1) | (36.1) | ||||||||
| Otherexpenses | (11.3) | (11.3) | ||||||||
| Total expenses | (121.6) | 0.1 | (51.6) | — | — | — | — | — | 0.7 | (172.4) |
| Profit before tax | 297.3 | (67.8) | (53.5) | (4.7) | — | 14.3 | — | 0.2 | — | 185.8 |
| Tax expense | ||||||||||
| Income taxbenefit | 3.0 | (3.1) | (0.1) | |||||||
| Withholding taxexpense | (5.0) | 4.3 | (0.7) | |||||||
| Total tax benefit/(expense) | (2.0) | — | — | — | 1.2 | — | — | — | — | (0.8) |
| Net profit attributable to other non-controllinginterests | (0.9) | (5.3) | (6.2) | |||||||
| Other | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||
| Net profit/FFO | 294.4 | (67.8) | (53.5) | (4.7) | 1.2 | 14.3 | (5.3) | 0.2 | 0.2 | 179.0 |
| Distribution (70% of FFO) | 125.3 | |||||||||
| Securitiesfordistribution(million) | 4,839.0 | |||||||||
| Distributionper security (cents) | 2.59 | |||||||||
| Fair value movements (slide 14) = (126.0) |
Refer to reconciliation in the Property Synopsis at http://www.dexus.com/investor/dxs_reports.aspx?id=r&cur=reports&type=property_synopsis for full details.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 50appendices — Slide 50
MANAGEMENT BUSINESS EBIT
| Profit and Loss | Balance sheet | Third party | Corporate | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| property | portfolio | costs | $’m | |
| $’m | $’m | $’m | ||
| Investment management | — | 13.4 | — | 13.4 |
| Internal RE charge at cost | 11.8 | — | — | 11.8 |
| Property services | 10.8 | 10.0 | — | 20.8 |
| Property management salaries | (3.9) | (4.6) | — | (8.5) |
| All other salaries and costs | (8.1) | (6.9) | (21.0) | (36.0) |
| Operating profit/(costs) | 10.6 | 11.9 | (21.0) | 1.5 |
| Assets under management $’bn | 13.6 | |||
| MER — corporate costs | 0.31% | |||
| MER1 | 0.53% |
- Excludes property management.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 51appendices — Slide 51
INTEREST RECONCILIATION
| Dec 2009 | Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’m | $’m | |
| Interest paid/payable | 60.8 | 60.8 |
| Other finance costs | 2.5 | 2.1 |
| Realised interest rate swap expense1 | 23.9 | 15.4 |
| Gross finance costs | 87.2 | 78.3 |
| Less: interest capitalised | (18.3) | (29.1) |
| Less: interest income | (0.8) | (0.7) |
| Net finance costs for distributable earnings(Slide 14) | 68.1 | 48.5 |
| Less: unrealised interest rate swap MTM loss1 | (20.3) | (51.6) |
| Add: finance costs attributable to asset disposal programme | 9.2 | — |
| Add: interest income | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Statutory finance costs(Fin Stats note 2) | 57.8 | (2.4) |
- Net fair value loss of interest rate swaps of $36.3m (per note 2) consists of realised interest rate swap expense ($15.4m) plus unrealised interest rate swap MTM gain $51.6m.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 52appendices — Slide 52
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
| June 2010 | Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| $’m | $’m | |
| Cash and receivables | 89 | 74 |
| Direct property portfolio | 7,307 | 7,343 |
| Other(includingderivative financial instruments and intangibles) | 475 | 440 |
| Total assets | 7,871 | 7,857 |
| Payables and provisions | 281 | 259 |
| Interest bearing liabilities | 2,240 | 2,178 |
| Other(includingderivative financial instruments) | 343 | 244 |
| Total liabilities | 2,864 | 2,681 |
| Less: non-controlling interests | 2051 | 204 |
| Less: intangible assets | 226 | 225 |
| Net tangible assets (after non-controlling interests) | 4,576 | 4,747 |
| NTAper security (excludingnon-controllinginterests) ($) | 0.95 | 0.98 |
| Gearing (net of cash) | 29.8% | 29.1% |
- Includes RENTS ($204m) and other non-controlling interests ($1m).
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 53appendices — Slide 53
NET ASSET VALUE COMPOSITION
� Property revaluations of $68 million or 1.4 cents of NTA
==> picture [403 x 220] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 54appendices — Slide 54
VALUATION METRICS
| Cap rate | Cap rate | Cap rate | IRR | IRR | IRR | Revaluation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10 | Dec 10 | change | Jun 10 | Dec 10 | change | increment/ | ||
| % | % | Bps | % | % | Bps | (decrement) | ||
| change1 | ||||||||
| % | ||||||||
| Office | 7.6 | 7.5 | 10 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 10 | 1.2 | |
| Industrial | 8.8 | 8.7 | 10 | 9.7 | 9.7 | — | (1.0) | |
| Industrial — | US2 | 8.4 | 8.1 | 30 | 8.9 | 8.7 | 20 | 3.1 |
| Industrial — | EU | 8.0 | 7.8 | 20 | 8.7 | 8.7 | — | (1.7) |
| Total | 8.0 | 7.9 | 10 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 10 | 0.9 |
-
Revaluation change includes investment property, development property and investments accounted for using the equity method.
-
Stabilised cap rate used for the US industrial portfolio.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 55appendices — Slide 55
REVALUATION SUMMARY
| Office | Industrial | US | Europe | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $’m | $’m | $’m | $’m | $’m | |
| P&L Revaluations — investment properties | |||||
| External valuations | 19 | (3) | 30 | (3) | 43 |
| Internal valuations | 9 | 5 | 8 | — | 22 |
| Sub total | 28 | 2 | 38 | (3) | 65 |
| P&L revaluations — development properties | |||||
| External valuations | 9 | — | — | — | 9 |
| Internal valuations | — | (19) | — | — | (19) |
| Sub total | 9 | (19) | — | — | (10) |
| P&L revaluations — equity accounted properties | |||||
| External valuations | 13 | — | — | — | 13 |
| Internal valuations | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sub total | 13 | — | — | — | 13 |
| Total P&L revaluations | 50 | (17) | 38 | (3) | 68 |
| Carry value — investment properties | |||||
| Externally revalued | 1,048 | 335 | 838 | 173 | 2,408 |
| Internally revalued | 2,769 | 992 | 409 | — | 4,156 |
| Sub total | 3,817 | 1,327 | 1,247 | 173 | 6,564 |
| Carry value — development properties | |||||
| Externally revalued | 343 | — | — | — | 343 |
| Internally revalued | — | 282 | 6 | — | 288 |
| Sub total | 343 | 282 | 6 | — | 631 |
| Carry value — equity accounted | |||||
| Externally revalued | 148 | — | — | — | 148 |
| Internally revalued | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sub total | 148 | — | — | — | 148 |
| Total carry value | 4,308 | 1,609 | 1,253 | 173 | 7,343 |
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 56appendices — Slide 56
DEVELOPMENTS UNDERWAY
| Country | Area | Est total | Est cost to | Est yield on | Est | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sqm | cost1 | completion | total cost | completion | ||
| $’m | $’m | % | date | |||
| Office | ||||||
| 123 Albert Street, Brisbane QLD | Australia | 38,000 | 376 | 68 | 6.75 | Jun 2011 |
| 1 Bligh Street, Sydney NSW1 | Australia | 43,000 | 222 | 67 | 7.0 | Jun 2011 |
| Southgate Complex, Southbank VIC | Australia | 9,000 | 26 | 23 | 8.8 | Nov 2011 |
| Total office | 90,000 | 624 | 158 | |||
| Industrial | ||||||
| Greystanes NSW — Symbion | Australia | 17,300 | 32 | 5 | 8.7 | Feb 2011 |
| Greystanes NSW — Fujitsu Australia | Australia | 17,025 | 32 | 12 | 9.9 | Oct 2011 |
| Laverton VIC — Loscam | Australia | 6,534 | 10 | 7 | 9.0 | Jun 2011 |
| Laverton VIC — Spec warehouse | Australia | 17,347 | 14 | 11 | 8.9 | Aug 2011 |
| Erskine Park NSW — Spec warehouse | Australia | 21,000 | 24 | 15 | 9.4 | Oct 2011 |
| Total industrial | 79,206 | 112 | 50 | |||
| Total underway | 169,206 | 736 | 208 |
- Includes land.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 57appendices — Slide 57
DEVELOPMENTS — UNCOMMITTED PIPELINE
| Developments | Country | Building | Project | Project to est | Projected yield on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| area | est | completion | project est cost | ||
| Sqm | $’m | $’m | % | ||
| Industrial | |||||
| Greystanes, Western Sydney NSW1 | Australia | 188,581 | 251 | 164 | 9.2 |
| DEXUS Industrial Estate, Laverton North VIC1 |
Australia | 146,606 | 185 | 121 | 9.2 |
| Axxess Corporate Park, Mt Waverley VIC | Australia | 16,000 | 51 | 44 | 9.0 |
| Total pipeline | 351,187 | 487 | 329 |
- Greystanes and DEXUS Industrial Estate Laverton land apportioned out for committed developments underway.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 58appendices — Slide 58
ACQUISITIONS
| Interest | Acquisition | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | A$’m | ||
| Australia | |||
| Templar Road, Erskine Park NSW | 100 | 15.9 | Aug 2010 |
| Balham Road, Archerfield QLD | 100 | 21.7 | Nov 2010 |
| United States | |||
| City of Industry Centre, California | 100 | 14.7 | Oct 2010 |
| La Mirada, California | 100 | 26.3 | Jan 2011 |
| Total acquisitions | 78.6 |
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 59appendices — Slide 59
DISPOSALS
| No of properties | A$’m | |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial — US | 3 | 37.7 |
| Industrial — EU | 1 | 7.2 |
| Total disposals at 31 Dec 2010 | 44.9 | |
| Industrial US — post date contract price | 4 | 22.8 |
| Total disposals | 67.7 |
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 60appendices — Slide 60
KEY FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT MEASURES
| June 2010 | Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Gearing1 | 29.8% | 29.1% |
| Covenant gearing1(covenant2 <55%) | 30.4% | 29.5% |
| Headroom (approx)3 | $1.2bn | $0.7bn |
| Average maturity of debt | 3.2 yrs | 3.4 yrs4 |
| Average maturity of interest hedge | 6.2 yrs | 6.1 yrs |
| Weighted average cost of debt5 | 6.6% | 6.7% |
| Debt plus RENTS hedged6 | 90% | 85% |
| Foreign balance sheet hedged7 | 93% | 91% |
| Foreign income hedged8 | 95% | 104% |
| Interest cover (covenant2 > 2.0x) | 3.1x | 3.2x |
| Priority debt (covenant2 < 30%) | 8.3% | 7.5% |
| S&P/Moody’s rating | BBB+/Baa1 | BBB+/Baa1 |
| 1. | Refer to glossary for gearing definition. |
|---|---|
| 2. | As per public bond covenants. |
| 3. | Undrawn facilities plus cash. |
-
Includes bank commitments received in February 2011.
-
Inclusive of margins, line and upfront fees, with margins calculated on a drawn basis (includes RENTS).
-
Average amount hedged for the period (includes RENTS).
-
Excludes working capital and cash.
-
Hedging as % of total foreign exposure, including foreign interest expense (“natural hedging”) and Foreign Exchange Contracts.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 61appendices — Slide 61
DEBT PROFILE
| Facility limit | Drawn | Maturity dates | Security | Currency | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A$’m | A$’m | ||||||
| Bilateral bank debt | 145 | — | Sep 11 | Unsecured | Multi-ccy, A$ limit1 | ||
| 178 | — | May 12-Jul 12 | Unsecured | Multi-ccy, A$ limit1 | |||
| 250 | 37 | Dec 12 | Unsecured | Multi-ccy, A$ limit1 | |||
| 250 | 155 | Sep 13 | Unsecured | Multi-ccy, A$ limit1 | |||
| 118 | 118 | Dec 13 | Unsecured | Multi-ccy, US$ limit2 | |||
| 275 | 275 | Jan 14-Dec 15 | Unsecured | Multi-ccy, A$ limit1 | |||
| Secured bank debt | 250 | 250 | Oct 11 | Secured | A$ | ||
| Mortgage loans | 40 | 40 | Feb 11 | Secured | US$ | ||
| 179 | 179 | Sep 11 | Secured | US$ | |||
| 88 | 88 | Feb 14 | Secured | US$ | |||
| Medium term notes (MTN) | 21 | 21 | Feb 11 | Unsecured | A$ | ||
| 160 | 160 | Jul 14 | Unsecured | A$ | |||
| 180 | 180 | Apr 17 | Unsecured | A$ | |||
| US senior notes(144a) | 294 | 294 | Oct 14 | Unsecured | US$ | ||
| US senior notes (USPP) | 102 | 102 | Feb 11 | Unsecured | US$ | ||
| 292 | 292 | Dec 11-Mar 173 | Unsecured | US$ | |||
| Total | 2,822 | 2,191 | |||||
| Bank Guarantee utilised | 9 | ||||||
| Cash | (44) | ||||||
| Headroom | 666 |
-
Capacity to draw in multi-currencies, facility limit denominated in AUD.
-
Capacity to draw in multi-currencies, facility limit denominated in USD.
-
$69m FY12, $223m FY13-17.
Note: profile not adjusted for bank commitments received in 2011.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 62appendices — Slide 62
FACILITY MIX
-
No off balance sheet debt (no look through adjustments)
-
All unsecured facilities rank pari passu
-
All secured facilities are non-recourse to DEXUS
Facility mix
==> picture [296 x 253] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Bank -
secured
Bank -
9%
unsecured
43%
MTN
13%
US 144a
10%
Mortgage
loans [1] USPP
11% 14%
----- End of picture text -----
- US$ loans predominantly from insurance companies, secured by mortgages over property.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 63appendices — Slide 63
DEBT BALANCES BY JURISDICTION
| Interest | Cross | RENTS | Total liabilities after | Weighted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bearing | currency | cross ccy swaps incl | average | ||
| liabilities | swaps1 | RENTS) for hedging2 | cost of debt3 | ||
| $’m | $’m | $’m | $’m | % | |
| Australia/New Zealand | A$935 | A$(182) | A$204 | A$957 | 7.31% |
| USA | US$1,202 | — | — | US$1,202 | 6.56% |
| Europe | €56 | €80 | — | €136 | 4.82% |
| Canada | — | C$50 | — | C$50 | 5.93% |
| Average/total | A$2,191 | — | A$204 | A$2,3662 | 6.74% |
| Less amortised debt costs | (A$13) | ||||
| Current and non-current | |||||
| interest bearing liabilities | A$2,178 |
-
Balance sheet naturally hedged through foreign liabilities
-
Minimal foreign currency debt drawn under multi-currency facilities
-
Cross currency swap principal amounts included at contract exchange rates. Refer slide 66 for maturity profile and rates.
-
Differs to total interest bearing liabilities (“IBLs”) by the amount of RENTS plus the cross currency swap mark-to-market.
-
Weighted average of fixed and floating rates for the current period, inclusive of fees and margins on a drawn basis. Includes RENTS.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 64appendices — Slide 64
INTEREST RATE HEDGING PROFILE
| HY11 | FY 11 | FY 12 | FY 13 | FY 14 | FY15 | Avg FY164 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A$’m average hedged1,3 | 680 | 718 | 750 | 642 | 560 | 510 | 203 |
| A$ hedge rate (ex margin)2,3 | 4.66% | 4.74% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 5.74% | 6.08% | 6.11% |
| US$’m average hedged1 | 1,092 | 1,002 | 797 | 925 | 943 | 924 | 381 |
| US$ hedge rate (ex margin)2 | 4.97% | 5.25% | 6.08% | 5.49% | 5.43% | 5.12% | 5.08% |
| €’m average hedged1 | 138 | 138 | 128 | 105 | 70 | 68 | 14 |
| € hedge rate (ex margin)2 | 4.40% | 4.40% | 4.43% | 4.55% | 4.86% | 4.21% | 4.08% |
| C$’m average hedged1 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 24 |
| C$ hedge rate (ex margin)2 | 5.41% | 5.41% | 5.41% | 5.41% | 5.41% | 5.41% | 5.41% |
| Total hedged (A$’m)1,3 | 2,075 | 1,979 | 1,750 | 1,738 | 1,629 | 1,558 | 620 |
| Hedge rate (ex margin)2,3 | 4.82% | 4.97% | 5.40% | 5.37% | 5.50% | 5.39% | 5.41% |
� Note: the above rates do not include fees, credit margins or floating interest rate assumptions. Refer slide 65 for current period weighted average cost of debt.
-
Average amount hedged across the period.
-
Weighted average rate of fixed debt and swaps for the period. 3. Includes RENTS.
-
Hedging out to 10 years.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 65appendices — Slide 65
FOREIGN INCOME HEDGING AND CROSS CURRENCY SWAP MATURITY PROFILE
| HY11 | FY11 | FY12 | FY13 | FY14 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign income hedging profile | ||||||||
| Foreign exchange contracts (US$m)1 | — | — | 4.4 | 2.7 | 2.5 | |||
| Average A$/US$ rate1 | — | — | 0.7098 | 0.6657 | 0.6798 | |||
| Foreign exchange contracts (NZ$m) | 1.0 | 2.0 | — | — | — | |||
| Average A$/NZ$ rate | 1.1834 | 1.1847 | — | — | — | |||
| FY11 | FY12 | |||||||
| Cross currency swap maturity profile | ||||||||
| € maturities (€m) | 40 | 40 | ||||||
| € contract rate | 0.6160 | 0.6145 | ||||||
| CAD maturities (C$m) | 15 | 35 | ||||||
| C$ contract rate | 0.9657 | 0.9345 |
- Excludes contracts that have been reversed.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 66appendices — Slide 66
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION Income and lease expiry
| % of total | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| income | % | % | % | % | % | ||
| Office | 54 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 34 | |
| Industrial | 24 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Industrial – | US | 18 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Industrial - | Europe | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 100 | 8 | 12 | 14 | 10 | 56 |
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 67appendices — Slide 67
OFFICE Key portfolio statistics
| HY Dec | HY Dec | |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2010 | |
| Net operating income | $121.9 m | $127.2m |
| NOI change | 2.4% | 4.3% |
| Like-for-like | 2.7% | 3.1% |
| Occupancy (area) | 95.8% | 96.5% |
| Occupancy (income) | 96.5% | 97.0% |
| Over/(under) rented | (3.7%) | (3.5%) |
| Retention rates1 | 61% | 76% |
| Lease duration by income (years) | 5.4 | 5.6 |
| Portfolio value | $4.0bn | $4.3bn |
| Average cap rate | 7.6% | 7.5% |
- Rolling 12 months.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 68appendices — Slide 68
OFFICE Portfolio diversification
Property classification by book value
==> picture [227 x 213] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
0.6%
4.0%
3.6%
3.2%
37.8%
50.8%
----- End of picture text -----
Premium A-grade B-grade Office & business parks Carparks Land
==> picture [5 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [5 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
Geographical weighting by book value
==> picture [302 x 234] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2.2%
1.7%
9.9%
7.4%
54.1%
13.1%
2.0%
4.0%
2.6%
3.0%
Sydney CBD North Sydney Chatswood Macquarie Park
Parramatta CBD Melbourne CBD Brisbane CBD Perth CBD
Canberra CBD Auckland CBD
----- End of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 69appendices — Slide 69
OFFICE Top ten tenants
| Tenant | S&P rating | % of | Diversity of tenants by income | Diversity of tenants by income | Diversity of tenants by income | Diversity of tenants by income | Diversity of tenants by income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOI1 | |||||||
| Woodside Energy | BBB+ stable | 8.5 | 8.7% | ||||
| S&K Car Park Management | Not rated | 7.6 | 6.0% | 2.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Commonwealth of Australia | AAA stable | 5.5 | |||||
| State of NSW | AAA stable | 4.5 | 6.3% | ||||
| Lend Lease | BBB- stable | 3.3 | |||||
| State of Victoria | AAA stable | 2.9 | 12.9% | ||||
| 17.3% | |||||||
| IBM Australia | A+ stable | 2.8 | |||||
| Mallesons Stephen Jacques | Not rated | 2.6 | |||||
| The Herald and Weekly Times | BBB+ stable | 2.2 | 13.2% | 13.7% | |||
| Goldman Sachs & Partners | A-12 | 1.7 | Government | Legal & Accounting | |||
| Mining | Finance | ||||||
| Parking | Property & Business Services | ||||||
| Telecommunications & IT | Insurance | ||||||
| Other |
-
31 December fully leased passing income annualised excluding pre-leased developments.
-
Short term rating only.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 70appendices — Slide 70
OFFICE Lease expiry profile at 31 December 2010
==> picture [687 x 347] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Vacant 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020+
Area Income
16.4% 16.4%
14.7%
14.2%
13.8%
13.2%
12.7%
11.3%
10.4%
10.0%
9.4%
8.6%
7.3%
7.0%
6.6%
4.9%
4.5%
4.1%
3.5%
3.0% 3.1%
2.6%
1.3% 1.1%
----- End of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 71appendices — Slide 71
OFFICE CBD office outlook
Net demand positive
==> picture [313 x 160] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
'000sqm
Past net absorption Forecast 20 yr average
500
400
20 yr average
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
----- End of picture text -----
Gross effective rent turning
==> picture [306 x 169] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
$ Average - Syd, Mel, Bris, Per
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
Dec-00 Dec-02 Dec-04 Dec-06 Dec-08 Dec-10 Dec-12
----- End of picture text -----
Supply subdued
==> picture [309 x 162] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Completed Under construction 20 year average
600
500
400
20 yr average
300
200
100
0
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [102 x 14] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Vacancy falling
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [263 x 147] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
% Average - Syd, Mel, Bris, Per
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Dec-00 Dec-02 Dec-04 Dec-06 Dec-08 Dec-10 Dec-12
----- End of picture text -----
Sources: Jones Lang LaSalle actual & DEXUS forecast.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 72appendices — Slide 72
OFFICE Demand — supply balance
Sydney CBD
==> picture [318 x 162] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
('000m2) Net Supply (LHS) Demand (LHS) Vacancy (RHS) (% of stock)
200 16%
14%
150
12%
100
10%
50 8%
6%
0
4%
-50
2%
-100 0%
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
----- End of picture text -----
Melbourne CBD
==> picture [319 x 147] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
('000m2) Net Supply (LHS) Demand (LHS) Vacancy (RHS) (% of stock)
200 16%
14%
150
12%
100
10%
50 8%
6%
0
4%
-50
2%
-100 0%
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
----- End of picture text -----
Perth CBD
Brisbane CBD
==> picture [650 x 158] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
(% of stock)
('000m2) Net supply (LHS) Demand (LHS) Vacancy
('000m2) Net Supply (LHS) Demand (LHS) Vacancy (RHS) (% of stock) 200 16%
200 16%
14%
150
14%
12%
150
12% 100
10%
100 10% 50 8%
8%
6%
50 6% 0
4%
4% -50
0 2%
2%
-100 0%
-50 0% 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
----- End of picture text -----
Sources: Jones Lang LaSalle actual & DEXUS forecast.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 73appendices — Slide 73
INDUSTRIAL Key portfolio statistics
| HY Dec | HY Dec | |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2010 | |
| Net operating income1 | $52.7m | $56.8m |
| NOI change | (1.3%) | 7.8% |
| Like-for-like | 1.9% | 1.4% |
| Occupancy (area) | 97.7% | 97.4% |
| Occupancy (income) | 97.3% | 97.0% |
| Over/(under) rented | 6.6% | 5.0% |
| Retention rates1 | 76% | 71% |
| Lease duration by income (years) | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Portfolio value | $1.5bn | $1.6bn |
| Average cap rate | 8.8% | 8.7% |
- Rolling 12 months.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 74appendices — Slide 74
INDUSTRIAL Portfolio diversification
Geographical weighting by book value
==> picture [266 x 209] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Adelaide
Brisbane 2%
4%
Sydney
58%
Melbourne
36%
----- End of picture text -----
Property classification by book value
==> picture [282 x 221] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Vacant land
15%
Business parks
33%
Industrial
estates 29%
Warehouse/
distribution
centres 22%
----- End of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 75appendices — Slide 75
INDUSTRIAL Top ten tenants
| Tenant | S&P rating | % of | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOI | |||
| Wesfarmers | BBB+ positive | 6.6% | |
| Elders Limited | BBB stable | 5.6% | |
| Visy | Not rated | 3.7% | |
| IBM Australia Limited | A+ stable | 3.1% | |
| DHL Logistics | BBB+ stable | 2.6% | |
| Fujitsu | Not rated | 2.5% | |
| Toll Transport Pty Ltd | Not rated | 2.5% | |
| Commonwealth of Australia | AAA stable | 2.3% | |
| Salmat BusinessForce Pty Ltd | Not rated | 2.2% | |
| Symbion Pharmacy Services | Not rated | 2.2% |
Diversity of tenants by income
==> picture [272 x 215] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Agriculture
6%
Other Wholesale
9% Trade
30%
Manufacturing
17%
Property &
Business
Transport &
16%
Storage
19%
----- End of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 76appendices — Slide 76
INDUSTRIAL Lease expiry profile at 31 December 2010
==> picture [650 x 270] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
30%
25.5%
25%
22.9%
20%
15%
13.2%
12.7%
12.1% 11.7% 11.6%
10.9%
9.5%
10% 8.8%
8.3%
7.1% 7.2%
5.5%
5% 4.2% 3.8% 3.7% 4.6% 4.0% 4.1%
3.0% 2.6%
1.7% 1.6%
0%
Vacant 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Lease expiry by income Lease expiry by area
----- End of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 77appendices — Slide 77
INDUSTRIAL National outlook
Merchandise imports rising
Industrial supply subdued
==> picture [299 x 163] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
'000sqm
Completed Under construction
3,000
20 yr average
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
----- End of picture text -----
Industrial imports and rent growth
==> picture [306 x 158] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Imports Sydney rent growth
% p.a.
20% 40%
30%
10% 20%
10%
0% 0%
-10%
-10% -20%
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
----- End of picture text -----
Sources: Jones Lang LaSalle actual , Access Economics & DEXUS forecast.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 78appendices — Slide 78
INDUSTRIAL — US Key portfolio statistics
| HY Dec | HY Dec | |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2010 | |
| Net operating income | US$46.9m | US$39.4m |
| Net operating income1 | A$54.0m | A$41.6m |
| NOI change (USD) | (6.6%) | (16.0%) |
| Like-for-like (USD) | (10.8%) | (8.3%) |
| Occupancy (area) | 87.8% | 86.4% |
| Occupancy (income) | 83.2% | 87.4% |
| Over rented | 6.3% | 6.9% |
| Retention rates | 60% | 65% |
| Lease duration by income (years) | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Portfolio value | US$1.2bn | US$1.3bn |
| Portfolio value1 | A$1.4bn | A$1.3bn |
| Average cap rate | 8.7% | 8.1% |
- At prevailing US/AUD FX rates (not constant currency).
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 79appendices — Slide 79
INDUSTRIAL — US Portfolio diversification
Geographical weighting by book value
==> picture [222 x 185] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
20%
50%
30%
----- End of picture text -----
West coast Whirlpool Central-east coast
Property classification by book value
==> picture [220 x 218] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 80appendices — Slide 80
INDUSTRIAL — US Top ten tenants
| US Industrial | S&P rating | % of |
|---|---|---|
| NOI | ||
| Whirlpool Corporation | BBB- positive | 24.4% |
| US Government/GSA | AAA stable | 3.1% |
| Advanced Bionics LLC | Not rated | 2.8% |
| Fedex Ground Package System | BBB stable | 1.8% |
| Skechers USA, Inc | Not rated | 1.1% |
| Fiesta Warehousing & Distribution |
Not rated | 1.0% |
| States Logistics Services, Inc. | Not rated | 0.9% |
| Michaels Stores, Inc. | B- stable | 0.9% |
| B&E Storage | Not rated | 0.9% |
| Kittrich Corporation | Not rated | 0.8% |
==> picture [331 x 274] intentionally omitted <==
1777 S Vintage Avenue, Ontario, CA
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 81appendices — Slide 81
INDUSTRIAL — US Lease expiry profile at 31 December 2010
==> picture [669 x 224] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
20%
17.6%
18%
16% 14.5% 14.7%
14% 12.6% 13.0%
12.1% 12.1%
11.5%
12%
10.2% 10.4%
9.3%
10%
7.8% 8.2%
8% 7.2%
6.3%
5.7% 5.7%
6% 5.1%
4.4%
3.9% 3.7%
4% 2.6%
2% 0.7% 0.9%
0%
Vacant 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020+
Lease expiry by area Lease expiry by income
----- End of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 82appendices — Slide 82
INDUSTRIAL — US
Total US Industrial — net demand positive
==> picture [319 x 160] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
('000m [2] ) Net Supply (LHS) Net Demand (LHS) Vacancy (RHS)
(% of stock)
60 16%
40
20 14%
0
-20 12%
-40
-60 10%
-80
-100 8%
June 06 Dec-06 Jun-07 Dec-07 Jun-08 Dec-08 Jun-09 Dec-09 Jun-10 Dec-10
----- End of picture text -----
Rent growth outlook
==> picture [323 x 149] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
('000m [2] ) East Metros West Coast
10%
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
----- End of picture text -----
Source: CBRE/Torto Wheaton and RREEF.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 83appendices — Slide 83
INDUSTRIAL — EUROPE Key portfolio statistics
| HY Dec 2009 HY Dec 2010 Net operating income €6.0m €5.8m Net operating income1 A$10.0m A$8.1m Like for like income growth (5.2%) (2.8%) Occupancy (area) 87.8% 84.7% Occupancy (income) 92.1% 90.5% Lease duration by income (years) 2.6 3.1 Portfolio value €133m €132m Portfolio value1 A$213m A$173m Average cap rate 8.2% 7.8% |
Top 5 tenants % of NOI |
|---|---|
| EDEKA Handelsgellschaft Südwest GmbH 21.7% Solideal Deutschland GmbH 10.9% Compass Security Logistick GmbH 8.5% Woolworth GmbH 7.9% Coca Cola 6.1% |
|
- At prevailing €/AUD FX rates (not constant currency).
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 84appendices — Slide 84
INDUSTRIAL — EUROPE Lease expiry profile at 31 December 2010
==> picture [654 x 302] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Vacant 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020+
Expiry by income Expiry by area
28.7% 28.9%
19.7%
17.2%
16.5%
15.3% 15.2%
14.5%
11.5%
9.5% 9.9%
7.8%
2.5% 2.8%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
----- End of picture text -----
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 85appendices — Slide 85
EXCHANGE RATES USED IN STATUTORY ACCOUNTS
| Dec 2009 | June 2010 | Dec 2010 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD | 0.8969 | 0.8523 | 1.0163 | |
| Closing rates for | EUR | 0.6241 | 0.6979 | 0.7647 |
| Statement of Financial Position | NZD | 1.2354 | 1.2308 | 1.3171 |
| CAD | 0.9434 | 0.8976 | 1.0167 | |
| USD | 0.8699 | 0.8800 | 0.9431 | |
| Average rates for Net Operating Income | EUR | 0.5995 | 0.6285 | 0.7132 |
| NZD | 1.2436 | 1.2554 | 1.2803 | |
| CAD | 0.9375 | 0.9306 | 0.9698 |
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 86appendices — Slide 86
GLOSSARY
-
Constant currency : Items shown at Constant currency for Dec 10 have been restated using the Dec 09 average FX rates for comparative purposes.
-
Distribution adjustments : Includes all distribution adjustments except for revaluations and impairments, unrealised MTM of derivatives, gain on sale and deferred tax.
-
Distribution payout policy : Distribution paid will be 70% of funds from operations (FFO).
-
Gearing : Gearing is represented by Interest Bearing Liabilities (excluding deferred borrowing costs) less cash divided by Total Tangible Assets (excluding derivatives and deferred tax assets) less cash. Covenant gearing is the same definition but not adjusted for cash.
-
Management EBIT : Comprises Responsible Entity fee revenue, third party fee revenue and corporate expenses including all staff costs for the DEXUS group.
-
Non-cash items : Includes property revaluations, impairment of intangibles, derivative MTM, gain on sale and deferred tax benefit.
-
Operating EBIT : Comprises net operating income, Management EBIT and other income less Responsible Entity fees and other expenses paid.
-
Portfolio value : Unless otherwise stated, Portfolio value is represented by investment properties, development properties and investments accounted for using the equity method, and excludes cash and other assets.
-
Responsible Entity fees : In this presentation Responsible Entity fees are shown at cost following internalisation in Feb 08. This Responsible Entity fee expense and the corresponding management fee revenue are eliminated in the statutory financial statements as the management business is a wholly owned consolidated entity.
-
Securities on issue : FFO per security is based on the average weighted units on issue prior to the Theoretical Ex-Rights Price (TERP) adjustment. In accordance with AASB133 the weighted average number of securities for earnings (EPS) purposes is adjusted by a factor equal to the security price immediately prior to issue divided by the TERP.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 87appendices — Slide 87
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
==> picture [720 x 121] intentionally omitted <==
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 88
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
-
This presentation is issued by DEXUS Funds Management Limited (DXFM) in its capacity as responsible entity of DEXUS Property Group (ASX:DXS). It is not an offer of securities for subscription or sale and is not financial product advice.
-
Information in this presentation including, without limitation, any forward looking statements or opinions (the Information) may be subject to change without notice. To the extent permitted by law, DXFM, DEXUS Property Group and their officers, employees and advisers do not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the currency, accuracy, reliability or completeness of the Information and disclaim all responsibility and liability for it (including, without limitation, liability for negligence). Actual results may differ materially from those predicted or implied by any forward looking statements for a range of reasons outside the control of the relevant parties.
-
The information contained in this presentation should not be considered to be comprehensive or to comprise all the information which a DEXUS Property Group security holder or potential investor may require in order to determine whether to deal in DEXUS Property Group stapled securities. This presentation does not take into account the financial situation, investment objectives and particular needs of any particular person.
-
The repayment and performance of an investment in DEXUS Property Group is not guaranteed by DXFM, any of its related bodies corporate or any other person or organisation.
-
This investment is subject to investment risk, including possible delays in repayment and loss of income and principal invested.
DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 89appendices — Slide 89
2011 DEXUS Property Group HALF YEAR RESULTS APPENDICES
DEXUS Funds Management Limited ABN 24 060 920 783 DEXUS Property Group 2011 Half year results presentation — Slide 90 AFSL 238163 as responsible entity for DEXUS Property Group