Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

DELUXE CORP Interim / Quarterly Report 2004

Nov 4, 2004

32349_10-q_2004-11-04_88da1765-fd01-4806-8a07-cd5b70fac3e8.zip

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

10-Q 1 deluxe045115_10q.htm Deluxe Corporation Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Center Bold" FSL="Default"

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Half Rule" FSL="Default" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Center Bold" FSL="Default"

FORM 10-Q

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Left" FSL="Default"

(Mark One)

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Hang" FSL="Default"

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Hang" FSL="Default"

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___ to _____

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Minor Center Bold" FSL="Default"

Commission file number: 1-7945

DELUXE CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Minnesota 41-0216800
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
3680 Victoria St. N., Shoreview, Minnesota 55126-2966
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Minor Center" FSL="Default"

(651) 483-7111 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ü No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ü No

The number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share, at October 25, 2004 was 50,227,262.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Center Bold" FSL="Default"

PART I–FINANCIAL INFORMATION

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Left" FSL="Default"

Item 1. Financial Statements.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Minor Center" FSL="Default"

DELUXE CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands, except share par value) (Unaudited)

September 30, 2004
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 13,899 $ 2,968
Restricted cash 819 —
Trade accounts receivable (net of allowances for
uncollectible accounts of $3,196 and $1,881, respectively) 120,454 37,066
Inventories and supplies 61,549 18,652
Deferred income taxes 21,396 258
Other current assets 53,734 19,984
Total current assets 271,851 78,928
Long-term Investments 46,389 42,510
Property, Plant, and Equipment (net of accumulated
depreciation of $297,852 and $295,570, respectively) 164,743 123,615
Assets Held for Sale 5,803 —
Intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $210,156 and
$172,614, respectively) 384,620 78,161
Goodwill 527,687 82,237
Other Non-current Assets 160,086 157,509
Total assets $ 1,561,179 $ 562,960
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 84,437 $ 46,694
Accrued liabilities 211,496 126,821
Short-term debt 318,606 213,250
Long-term debt due within one year 1,503 1,074
Total current liabilities 616,042 387,839
Long-term Debt 975,559 380,620
Deferred Income Taxes 121,301 42,654
Other Non-current Liabilities 62,054 49,930
Shareholders’ Deficit:
Common shares $1 par value (authorized: 500,000,000
shares; issued: 2004 – 50,225,104; 2003 – 50,173,067) 50,225 50,173
Additional paid-in capital 15,730 —
Accumulated deficit (263,886 ) (345,950 )
Unearned compensation — (41 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax (15,846 ) (2,265 )
Total shareholders’ deficit (213,777 ) (298,083 )
Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit $ 1,561,179 $ 562,960

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Default" FSL="Default"

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

2

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Minor Center" FSL="Default"

DELUXE CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 2004 2003
Revenue $ 484,965 $ 314,869 $ 1,103,176 $ 941,623
Cost of goods sold 170,520 105,974 380,271 322,515
Gross Profit 314,445 208,895 722,905 619,108
Selling, general and administrative expense 213,744 120,914 460,479 368,815
Asset impairment and net disposition (gains)
losses (46 ) 319 33 108
Operating Income 100,747 87,662 262,393 250,185
Other income (expense) 18 (424 ) 671 (858 )
Income Before Interest and Taxes 100,765 87,238 263,064 249,327
Interest expense (8,926 ) (4,934 ) (19,303 ) (14,205 )
Interest income 605 75 801 308
Income Before Income Taxes 92,444 82,379 244,562 235,430
Provision for income taxes 34,939 24,197 93,407 82,377
Net Income $ 57,505 $ 58,182 $ 151,155 $ 153,053
Earnings per Share: Basic $ 1.15 $ 1.10 $ 3.02 $ 2.74
Diluted 1.14 1.09 2.99 2.71
Cash Dividends per Share $ 0.37 $ 0.37 $ 1.11 $ 1.11
Total Comprehensive Income $ 45,758 $ 58,245 $ 137,574 $ 153,241

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Default" FSL="Default"

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

3

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Minor Center" FSL="Default"

DELUXE CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income $ 151,155 $ 153,053
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation 19,132 16,445
Amortization of intangibles 43,862 27,696
Amortization of contract acquisition costs 24,152 18,783
Employee stock-based compensation expense 8,660 671
Other non-cash items, net 8,730 7,750
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisition:
Trade accounts receivable (15,440 ) 871
Inventories and supplies (1,039 ) 1,287
Other current assets (17,957 ) (5,218 )
Contract acquisition payments (8,319 ) (44,553 )
Deferred advertising costs (637 ) (10,916 )
Other non-current assets (2,631 ) (6,444 )
Accounts payable (609 ) (5,579 )
Accrued and other non-current liabilities 4,393 (2,897 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 213,452 150,949
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Payments for acquisition, net of cash acquired (623,550 ) —
Increase in restricted cash (819 ) —
Purchases of capital assets (26,177 ) (15,672 )
Other (767 ) (852 )
Net cash used by investing activities (651,313 ) (16,524 )
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net borrowings of short-term debt 105,315 200,090
Net proceeds from long-term debt 595,644 49,825
Payments of long-term debt (166,594 ) (1,326 )
Settlement of interest rate lock agreements (23,564 ) —
Change in book overdrafts 1,952 (6,775 )
Payments for common shares repurchased (26,637 ) (453,234 )
Proceeds from issuing shares under employee plans 17,913 17,328
Cash dividends paid to shareholders (55,701 ) (61,751 )
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 448,328 (255,843 )
Effect of Exchange Rate Change on Cash 464 —
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 10,931 (121,418 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Beginning of Period 2,968 124,855
End of Period $ 13,899 $ 3,437

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Default" FSL="Default"

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

4

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Center Bold" FSL="Default"

DELUXE CORPORATION NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 1: Consolidated financial statements

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004, the consolidated statements of income for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements are included. Adjustments consist only of normal recurring items, except for any discussed in the notes below. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q, and do not contain certain information included in our consolidated annual financial statements and notes. The consolidated financial statements and notes appearing in this report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 2: Financing for acquisition of New England Business Service, Inc.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

On June 25, 2004, we acquired New England Business Service, Inc. (NEBS) for $639.6 million. Further detail regarding the accounting for this acquisition can be found in Note 3, Acquisition of New England Business Service, Inc. To finance the acquisition, we utilized $475.0 million of an $800.0 million bridge financing agreement, as well as commercial paper (see Note 10). During the third quarter of 2004, we increased our commercial paper program from $500.0 million to $1.0 billion and utilized commercial paper to pay-off the bridge financing. On October 1, 2004, we issued $600.0 million of long-term debt and subsequently canceled the bridge financing agreement. The net proceeds from this debt of $595.6 million were utilized to pay outstanding commercial paper. As such, $595.6 million of commercial paper debt is presented as long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004. Further details concerning the long-term debt issued can be found in Note 10, Debt. On October 7, 2004, we reduced our commercial paper program back to $500.0 million.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 3: Acquisition of New England Business Service, Inc.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

On June 25, 2004, we acquired via a tender offer approximately 98% of the outstanding common stock of NEBS for $44 per share. Immediately following the close of the tender offer, we completed a merger under which NEBS became a wholly-owned subsidiary and we became obligated to pay for the untendered shares at a price of $44 per share. We also agreed to redeem all outstanding NEBS stock options for $44 per option share less the option exercise price. As of September 30, 2004, a portion of the direct costs of the acquisition had not been paid and were included in accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. We anticipate that substantially all of these payments will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2004. The total purchase price for the acquisition was comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

Cash payments for NEBS common stock $
Cash payments to redeem NEBS stock options 44,087
Direct costs of the acquisition 10,161
Total purchase price $ 639,600
Amount paid through September 30, 2004 $ 638,231
Cash acquired from NEBS (14,681 )
Payments for acquisition through September 30,
2004, net of cash acquired $ 623,550

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

5

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As of September 30, 2004, we had $0.8 million of restricted cash. Upon the acquisition of NEBS, we were required to place on deposit the funds required to pay the shareholders who did not tender their shares of NEBS common stock under the tender offer. These shareholders must present their stock certificates in order to receive their portion of the funds. The funds must remain on deposit for a period of nine months, after which time the funds will be returned to us, and thereafter, any remaining unclaimed funds will be remitted to the appropriate governmental authority under applicable escheat laws.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

NEBS is a leading provider of products and services to small businesses. Its offerings include checks, forms, packaging supplies, embossed foil anniversary seals, promotional products and other printed material which are marketed through direct sales, telesales, a direct sales force, dealers, dedicated distributors and the Internet. NEBS also designs, embroiders and sells specialty apparel products through distributors and independent sales representatives. We believe NEBS is a strategic fit, as we both serve small business customers, and the acquisition expands our product offerings, customer base and non-check revenue.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

NEBS operating results are included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition. Our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004 reflects the allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. This allocation is preliminary, pending the completion of detailed analyses and outside appraisals of the fair values of the assets acquired, as well as completion of management’s integration plans. Once these analyses and appraisals have been completed, the allocation of the purchase price will be finalized. We have announced our intention to utilize a shared services environment approach for both manufacturing and certain selling, general and administrative (SG&A) functions. This approach will most likely result in the exit of certain activities. However, to ensure that we continue to meet customer expectations, significant analysis is required before all such plans can be finalized. To the extent the activities to be discontinued are NEBS activities, we would adjust the preliminary purchase price allocation to reflect additional restructuring liabilities. If the discontinued activities are Deluxe activities, any restructuring accruals would be reflected in our consolidated statements of income. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price does reflect $20.5 million of restructuring accruals for those NEBS activities which we have already decided to exit. These accruals are discussed in Note 9, Restructuring charges.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

6

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $445.5 million. We believe that the NEBS acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because of its industry position, the potential to introduce products across multiple channels and the ability to realize cost synergies. The following illustrates our preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (dollars in thousands):

Cash and cash equivalents $
Trade accounts receivable 71,563
Inventories and supplies 41,729
Deferred income taxes 21,370
Other current assets 14,732
Long-term investments 2,974
Property, plant and equipment 54,816
Assets held for sale 2,208
Intangibles 333,883
Goodwill 445,450
Other non-current assets 8,420
Accounts payable (34,729 )
Accrued liabilities (81,963 )
Long-term debt due within one year (10,417 )
Long-term debt (155,203 )
Deferred income taxes (86,902 )
Other non-current liabilities (3,012 )
Total purchase price $ 639,600

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulted in the recognition of the following intangible assets (dollars in thousands):

Amount Weighted- average amortization period
Indefinite lives:
Tradenames $ 151,200
Amortizable intangibles:
Customer lists 103,900 6.3 years
Distributor contracts 30,900 9.0 years
Internal-use software 25,483 3.6 years
Tradenames 16,100 5.0 years
Bank referral agreements 6,300 11.0 years
Total amortizable intangibles 182,683 6.5 years
Total intangible assets acquired $ 333,883

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Amortizable tradenames and software are being amortized on the straight-line basis. The other amortizable intangible assets are being amortized using accelerated methods. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we recorded amortization of NEBS intangibles of $13.1 million. The amount assigned to intangible assets acquired, as well as the related amortization periods, may change once our detailed analyses and outside asset appraisals are completed.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

7

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The following unaudited, pro forma financial information illustrates our estimated results of operations as if the acquisition of NEBS had occurred as of the beginning of each period presented (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Revenue $ 484,965 $ 489,892 $ 1,453,314 $ 1,464,077
Net income 57,505 55,321 137,978 131,503
Earnings per share:
Basic $ 1.15 $ 1.05 $ 2.75 $ 2.36
Diluted 1.14 1.03 2.73 2.33

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Indent" FSL="Default"

NEBS results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 included goodwill and asset impairment charges of $13.2 million related to their apparel business. These charges are reflected in the above pro forma results of operations. The pro forma results of operations are presented for comparative purposes only. They do not represent the results which would have been reported had the acquisition occurred on the dates assumed and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 4: Employee stock-based compensation

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

On January 1, 2004, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We are reporting this change in accounting principle using the modified prospective method of adoption described in SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure. Beginning in 2004, our results of operations reflect compensation expense for all employee stock-based compensation, including the unvested portion of previous stock options granted. This is the same amount of compensation expense which would have been recognized had the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 been applied from its original effective date. Prior to 2004, we accounted for our employee stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees . Under this method of accounting, no compensation expense was recognized for stock options or for our employee stock purchase plan. In accordance with the modified prospective method of transition, results for 2003 have not been restated to reflect this change in accounting principle.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the second quarter of 2004, we implemented changes to our long-term compensation strategy. Rather than using stock options as the exclusive form of long-term incentive, we now utilize a combination of stock options, performance shares and restricted stock. All such awards are granted under our shareholder-approved stock incentive plan. The level of shares earned under the performance share component is contingent upon the attainment of specific performance targets over a three-year period. The fair value of the performance shares granted is equal to the market price of our stock at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recorded over the three-year performance period based on our estimate of the number of shares which will be earned by the award recipients. In addition, during the second quarter of 2004, we issued 40,404 restricted shares to employees. The fair value of these awards is equal to the market price of our stock at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recorded over the three year vesting period.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Total stock-based compensation expense was $2.9 million for the third quarter of 2004. This expense is reflected as cost of goods sold of $0.2 million and SG&A expense of $2.7 million in our consolidated statement of income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004. For the first nine months of 2004, total stock-based compensation expense was $8.7 million, with $0.7 million reflected in cost of goods sold and $8.0 million reflected in SG&A expense in our consolidated statement of income.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

8

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the fair value method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 2004 2003
Net income, as reported $ 57,505 $ 58,182 $ 151,155 $ 153,053
Add employee stock-based compensation
included in net income:
Stock options and employee stock purchase
plan 1,511 — 5,273 —
Performance shares (148 ) — 447 —
Restricted stock and restricted stock units 1,490 (94 ) 2,940 671
Total 2,853 (94 ) 8,660 671
Tax benefit (1,079 ) 27 (3,308 ) (263 )
Employee stock-based compensation included in
net income, net of tax 1,774 (67 ) 5,352 408
Deduct fair value employee stock-based
compensation, net of tax (1,774 ) (1,140 ) (5,352 ) (3,548 )
Pro forma net income $ 57,505 $ 56,975 $ 151,155 $ 149,913
Earnings per share:
Basic – as reported $ 1.15 $ 1.10 $ 3.02 $ 2.74
pro forma 1.15 1.08 3.02 2.69
Diluted – as reported $ 1.14 $ 1.09 $ 2.99 $ 2.71
pro forma 1.14 1.07 2.99 2.67

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 5: Changes in accounting estimates and principle

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the first quarter of 2004, we revised the estimated useful lives for certain of our software and production assets, as we expect that the assets will be replaced or retired sooner than originally anticipated. The weighted-average useful life for these assets was shortened from 8.0 years to 6.8 years. This change in accounting estimate is expected to result in increased depreciation and amortization expense of $8.5 million in 2004. In the third quarter of 2004, $2.6 million of this additional expense was recorded, and during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, $6.0 million of this additional expense was recorded.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

On July 1, 2004, we changed the method of accounting for a portion of our inventories. Inventories previously accounted for under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method will now be accounted for using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. This change resulted in a decrease in cost of goods sold of $2.2 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, during the third quarter of 2004, primarily in our Financial Services segment. The impact on previously reported financial statements was not significant enough to warrant restatement of those financial statements to reflect this change. We consider the FIFO method to be preferable. The effect on net income of utilizing the LIFO method is not significantly different than the results that would be obtained using the FIFO method. Thus, the administrative effort of maintaining LIFO accounting records does not result in improved reporting of our results of operations. Additionally, the recently acquired NEBS

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

9

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

business (see Note 3) utilizes the FIFO method. This change results in a consistent accounting methodology across the company.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 6: New accounting pronouncement

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In May 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 . This FSP outlines the appropriate accounting treatment for the effects of the new Medicare law, including the required financial statement disclosures, and supersedes the previous guidance issued by the FASB in January 2004. The new Medicare law introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare, as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to the Medicare plan. Our retiree medical plans do provide prescription drug coverage which is at least actuarially equivalent to the Medicare plan. Effective April 1, 2004, we have elected to adopt the accounting treatment required by FSP No. FAS 106-2 utilizing the retroactive application method. As a result, our post-retirement benefit expense for the second and third quarters of 2004 reflects the impact of the new Medicare law. This impact is discussed in Note 12, Post-retirement benefits.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 7: Supplementary balance sheet information

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Inventories and supplies – Inventories and supplies were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
Raw materials $ 33,264 $ 2,550
Semi-finished goods 7,659 5,623
Finished goods 12,116 975
Total inventories 53,039 9,148
Supplies 8,510 9,504
Inventories and supplies $ 61,549 $ 18,652

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Other current assets – Other current assets were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
Prepayment to voluntary employee $ 29,316 $ 12,657
beneficiary association (VEBA) trust
Other 24,418 7,327
Other current assets $ 53,734 $ 19,984

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

10

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Assets held for sale – Assets held for sale relate to three of our Financial Services check printing facilities which were closed in the first half of 2004, as well as one NEBS facility which was closed prior to our acquisition of NEBS (see Note 3). We are actively seeking buyers for these properties and expect to dispose of them within one year from the date they were closed. Based on market research and appraisal information, we believe the fair values of the assets less costs to sell exceed the carrying values of the assets. As such, no impairment loss has been recognized for these assets. Assets held for sale were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

Land and land improvements September 30, 2004 — $ 1,925
Buildings and building improvements 9,828
Machinery and equipment 1,216
Total 12,969
Accumulated depreciation (7,166 )
Assets held for sale - net $ 5,803

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We are currently in the process of closing two additional check printing facilities located in Anniston, Alabama and Dallas, Texas, as well as one NEBS facility located in Tucker, Georgia (see Note 9). We anticipate that these facilities will be closed during the fourth quarter of 2004. The Anniston facility is leased, and thus will not be reported as an asset held for sale. The Dallas and Tucker facilities are owned, and we anticipate selling these facilities once operations at those locations cease. Based on our analysis, no impairment losses have been recognized for these facilities.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Other non-current assets – Other non-current assets were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
Contract acquisition costs (net of accumulated amortization of $ 86,595 $ 96,085
$48,212 and $41,608, respectively)
Deferred advertising costs 34,922 29,044
Prepaid post-retirement asset 19,802 19,839
Other 18,767 12,541
Other non-current assets $ 160,086 $ 157,509

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Changes in contract acquisition costs during the first nine months of 2004 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Balance, December 31, 2003 $
Cash payments 8,319
Change in accruals 6,343
Amortization (24,152 )
Balance, September 30, 2004 $ 86,595

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

11

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Indent" FSL="Default"

Accrued liabilities – Accrued liabilities were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
Income taxes $ 45,156 $ 25,372
Employee profit sharing and pension 30,742 22,075
Rebates 25,908 21,253
Accrued wages 22,207 8,906
Other 87,483 49,215
Accrued liabilities $ 211,496 $ 126,821

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 8: Earnings per share

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Indent" FSL="Default"

The following table reflects the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Earnings per share – basic:
Net income $ 57,505 $ 58,182 $ 151,155 $ 153,053
Weighted-average shares outstanding 50,121 52,735 50,089 55,769
Earnings per share – basic $ 1.15 $ 1.10 $ 3.02 $ 2.74
Earnings per share – diluted:
Net income $ 57,505 $ 58,182 $ 151,155 $ 153,053
Weighted-average shares outstanding 50,121 52,735 50,089 55,769
Dilutive impact of options 385 726 390 739
Shares contingently issuable 69 10 37 11
Weighted-average shares and potential
dilutive shares outstanding 50,575 53,471 50,516 56,519
Earnings per share – diluted $ 1.14 $ 1.09 $ 2.99 $ 2.71

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, options to purchase 1.3 million common shares were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, a weighted-average of 1.7 million options were excluded from the calculation. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, 1.2 million outstanding options were excluded from the computation. These options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

12

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 9: Restructuring charges

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

2004 restructuring charges – During the third quarter of 2004, we recorded restructuring charges of $2.2 million for severance related to the planned closing of our Financial Services check printing facility located in Dallas, Texas and the previously announced closing of our Direct Checks check printing facility located in Anniston Alabama, as well as various employee reductions primarily within our Financial Services segment. The closing of the Dallas facility is primarily due to the loss of a major financial institution client whose contract expires at the end of 2004. Additionally, cost management is one of our strategic objectives, and we are continually seeking ways to lower our cost structure. We anticipate that the Dallas and Anniston facilities will be closed during the fourth quarter of 2004 and the other employee reductions will be completed during the first half of 2005. The related severance payments will be funded by cash from operations. The restructuring charges include estimated severance benefits for 162 employees. The severance benefits for employees in our Anniston facility were accrued over the second and third quarters of 2004, as they are payable under a one-time severance benefit plan. The other employee reductions are payable under our ongoing severance benefit plan and were accrued in their entirety in the third quarter of 2004. Also during the third quarter of 2004, we reversed $0.1 million of previously recorded restructuring accruals due to fewer employees receiving severance benefits than originally estimated. These restructuring charges and reversals are reflected as cost of goods sold of $1.5 million and SG&A expense of $0.6 million in our consolidated statement of income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the first and second quarters of 2004, we recorded restructuring charges of $2.8 million for severance related to the planned closing of our Direct Checks check printing facility located in Anniston, Alabama, as well as reductions within various functional areas within our Direct Checks and Financial Services segments and our corporate support group. The restructuring charges include estimated severance benefits for 309 employees, including the employees in our Anniston, Alabama facility which is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2004. We expect the other employee reductions to also be substantially completed by the end of the year. Also during the first and second quarters of 2004, we reversed $1.1 million of previously recorded restructuring accruals due to fewer employees receiving severance benefits than originally estimated. The restructuring charges and reversals recorded during 2004 are reflected as cost of goods sold of $1.6 million and SG&A expense of $2.2 million in our consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

2003 restructuring charges – During the third quarter of 2003, we recorded restructuring charges of $1.5 million for employee severance related to reductions in SG&A employees within the Financial Services segment. These reductions were the result of our continuous efforts to manage costs. The restructuring charges included estimated severance payments for 48 employees, which were payable under our on-going severance benefit plan. These severance payments were substantially completed during the first half of 2004, utilizing cash from operations. The restructuring charges are reflected as SG&A expense in our consolidated statement of income for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the second quarter of 2003, we recorded restructuring charges of $1.3 million for employee severance related to the closing of our Financial Services check printing facility located in Indianapolis, Indiana. This facility was closed during the first quarter of 2004. The restructuring charges reflected severance payments for 136 employees, which were payable under our ongoing severance benefit plan. These payments were substantially completed in the third quarter of 2004, utilizing cash from operations. The 2003 restructuring charges are reflected as cost of goods sold of $1.3 million and SG&A expense of $1.5 million in our consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Acquisition-related restructuring – As a result of the NEBS acquisition on June 25, 2004 (see Note 3), we assumed restructuring accruals of $1.3 million related to NEBS facility closings which were completed prior to the acquisition. Employee severance payments related to these facility closings are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2004, utilizing cash from operations. Additionally, as a result of the acquisition, we recorded restructuring accruals of $20.5 million related to activities of NEBS which will be exited as we combine the two companies and execute a shared services model for both manufacturing and certain SG&A functions. These accruals include severance payments for 283 employees in information services, sales, finance and human resources, as well as employees of NEBS Tucker, Georgia printing facility which we expect to close during the fourth quarter of 2004. This amount also includes payments due to certain NEBS executives under change of control provisions included in their employment agreements, as we eliminate redundancies between the two companies. The related payments are expected

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

13

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

to be substantially completed by the end of 2005, utilizing cash from operations. As these accruals were included in the liabilities recorded upon acquisition, they are not reflected in our consolidated statements of income.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Restructuring accruals for employee severance costs of $18.4 million as of September 30, 2004 and $10.7 million as of December 31, 2003 are reflected in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Our restructuring accruals as of December 31, 2003, related to the closing of three Financial Services check printing facilities and other employee reductions within Financial Services and our corporate support group. All three of the check printing facilities have been closed. The other employee reductions were substantially completed during the first quarter of 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Changes in the restructuring accruals during the first nine months of 2004 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

2003 initiatives — Amount No. of employees affected Amount No. of employees affected Amount No. of employees affected NEBS acquisition-related — Amount No. of employees affected Amount No. of employees affected
Balance, December 31, 2003 $ 10,748 533 $ — — $ — — $ — — $ 10,748 533
Restructuring charges — — 5,012 464 — — — — 5,012 464
NEBS acquisition — — — — 1,321 — 20,515 283 21,836 283
Restructuring reversals (1,120 ) (42 ) (40 ) (17 ) — — — — (1,160 ) (59 )
Severance paid (9,129 ) (486 ) (1,270 ) (139 ) (1,083 ) — (6,585 ) (133 ) (18,067 ) (758 )
Balance, September 30, 2004 $ 499 5 $ 3,702 308 $ 238 — $ 13,930 150 $ 18,369 463

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Indent" FSL="Default"

On a cumulative basis through September 30, 2004, the status of our restructuring accruals was as follows (dollars in thousands):

2003 initiatives — Amount No. of employees affected Amount No. of employees affected Amount No. of employees affected NEBS acquisition-related — Amount No. of employees affected Amount No. of employees affected
Original restructuring charges $ 11,794 635 $ 5,012 464 $ 1,321 — $ 20,515 283 $ 38,642 1,382
Restructuring reversals (1,320 ) (62 ) (40 ) (17 ) — — — — (1,360 ) (79 )
Severance paid (9,975 ) (568 ) (1,270 ) (139 ) (1,083 ) — (6,585 ) (133 ) (18,913 ) (840 )
Balance, September 30, 2004 $ 499 5 $ 3,702 308 $ 238 — $ 13,930 150 $ 18,369 463

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In addition to severance costs, we also incur costs related to the closing of our Financial Services and Direct Checks check printing facilities such as equipment moves, training and travel. These costs are expensed as incurred, primarily as cost of goods sold, and are expected to total approximately $2 million. Of this amount, $1.1 million was expensed in the first nine months of 2004 and $0.3 million was expensed in 2003. The majority of the remaining expenses will be recognized in the fourth quarter of 2004 as we complete the closure of these facilities.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

14

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 10: Debt

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Total debt outstanding was comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
Commercial paper refinanced with long-term debt on October 1,
2004 $ 595,644 $ —
5.0% senior, unsecured notes due December 15, 2012, net of
discount 298,446 298,304
2.75% senior, unsecured notes due September 15, 2006 50,000 50,000
Variable rate senior, unsecured notes due November 4, 2005 25,000 25,000
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations 6,469 7,316
Long-term portion of debt 975,559 380,620
Commercial paper 318,606 213,250
Capital lease obligations due within one year 1,503 1,074
Total debt $ 1,295,668 $ 594,944

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our short-term debt consisted of outstanding commercial paper. During the third quarter of 2004, we increased the amount of our commercial paper program from $500.0 million to $1.0 billion and utilized commercial paper to pay-off the bridge financing agreement put in place to complete the acquisition of NEBS (see Note 2). During October 2004, the bridge financing agreement was canceled and we reduced our commercial paper program back to $500.0 million. The daily average amount outstanding under the bridge financing agreement during the first nine months of 2004 was $83.2 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 2.07%. The daily average amount of commercial paper outstanding during the first nine months of 2004 was $361.2 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.45%. As of September 30, 2004, $914.3 million was outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.89%. The daily average amount of commercial paper outstanding during 2003 was $149.4 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.15%. As of December 31, 2003, $213.3 million was outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.11%.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

On October 1, 2004, we issued $600.0 million of long-term notes via a private placement under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The net proceeds from this debt of $595.6 million were utilized to pay outstanding commercial paper. As such, $595.6 million of commercial paper debt is presented as long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004. We issued $325.0 million of senior, unsecured notes which mature on October 1, 2007 and have a coupon rate of 3.5%. We also issued $275.0 million of senior, unsecured notes which mature on October 1, 2014 and have a coupon rate of 5.125%. The notes include covenants that place restrictions on the issuance of debt that would be senior to the notes and the execution of certain sale-leaseback arrangements. We have agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to an exchange offer for the notes, or under certain circumstances, to file a shelf registration statement for the notes.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We also have committed lines of credit which primarily support our commercial paper program. We have a 364-day line of credit for $100.0 million which expires in July 2005 and carries a commitment fee of ten basis points (.10%). We also have two five-year lines of credit. One five-year line of credit is for $175.0 million and expires in August 2007. The other line of credit is for $225.0 million and expires in July 2009. Both five-year lines of credit carry commitment fees of 12.5 basis points (.125%). The credit agreements governing the lines of credit contain customary covenants regarding the ratio of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to interest expense and levels of subsidiary indebtedness. No amounts were drawn on these lines of credit during the first nine months of 2004 or during 2003, and no amounts were outstanding under these lines of credit as of September 30, 2004. To the extent not needed to support outstanding commercial

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

15

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

paper or letters of credit, we may borrow funds under our lines of credit. As of September 30, 2004, $131.8 million was available under our committed lines of credit for borrowing or for support of additional commercial paper.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We also have an uncommitted bank line of credit for $50.0 million available at variable interest rates. No amounts were drawn on this line of credit during the first nine months of 2004 or during 2003, and no amounts were outstanding under this line of credit as of September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In December 2002, we issued $300.0 million of senior, unsecured notes which mature in December 2012 and have a coupon rate of 5.0%. The notes include covenants that place restrictions on the issuance of debt that would be senior to the notes and the execution of certain sale-leaseback arrangements. The fair value of these notes was estimated to be $299.2 million as of September 30, 2004, based on quoted market rates.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

On April 30, 2003, we filed a Form S-3 shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This shelf registration allows for the issuance of debt securities, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $500.0 million. The shelf registration statement became effective on July 8, 2003. In September 2003, we issued $50.0 million of medium-term notes. These notes mature in September 2006 and have a coupon rate of 2.75%. The fair value of these notes was estimated to be $49.5 million as of September 30, 2004, based on quoted market rates. In November 2003, we issued $25.0 million of medium-term notes which mature in November 2005 and have an interest rate equal to the 3-month London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus .05%. This interest rate is reset on a quarterly basis. The fair value of these notes was estimated to be $25.0 million as of September 30, 2004, based on a broker quote.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 11: Derivative financial instruments

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During 2004, we entered into $450.0 million of forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge, or lock-in, the interest rate on a portion of the $600.0 million debt we issued in October 2004 (see Note 10). We terminated these agreements on September 28, 2004, yielding a deferred pre-tax loss of $23.6 million. This loss is reflected, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004 and will be reclassified ratably to our statements of income as an increase to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 12: Post-retirement and benefits

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We have historically provided certain health care benefits for a large number of retired employees. As discussed in Note 6, our retiree medical plan provides prescription drug coverage which is at least actuarially equivalent to the Medicare law enacted in December 2003. Our post-retirement benefit expense for the second and third quarters of 2004 reflects the impact of the new Medicare law, utilizing the retroactive application method outlined in FSP No. FAS 106-2. In accordance with this accounting guidance, we completed a re-measurement of our plan assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2003. The federal subsidy provided for under the new Medicare law resulted in a $9.5 million reduction in our accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2003 and resulted in a $0.7 million reduction in our post-retirement benefit expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As discussed in Note 3, we acquired NEBS on June 25, 2004. NEBS sponsors a plan which provides post-retirement health and dental care benefits for officers and health and insurance benefits for certain employees of two NEBS subsidiaries, Safeguard Business Systems, Inc. and PremiumWear, Inc. As of the date of acquisition, the plan’s accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was $2.7 million.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

16

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our post-retirement benefit expense for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 consisted of the following components (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 2004 2003
Service cost (benefits earned during the
period) $ 199 $ 639 $ 586 $ 1,917
Interest cost on the accumulated post-
retirement benefit obligation 1,486 1,949 4,525 5,847
Expected return on plan assets (1,635 ) (1,123 ) (4,741 ) (3,368 )
Amortization of transition obligation — 105 — 314
Amortization of prior service (benefit) cost (654 ) 90 (1,962 ) 272
Recognized amortization of net actuarial
losses 1,759 1,021 5,586 3,062
Total post-retirement benefit expense $ 1,155 $ 2,681 $ 3,994 $ 8,044

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We have invested assets in a trust established under section 401(h) of the Internal Revenue Code to partially fund our post-retirement benefit obligation. We are not contractually obligated to make contributions to this trust, and we do not anticipate making any such contributions during 2004. However, we do anticipate that we will pay benefits of $9.6 million during 2004 utilizing the assets of our VEBA trust which are available to fund employee and retiree medical and severance benefits.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

NEBS has a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) and a pension plan which covers certain Canadian employees. As of the date of our acquisition of NEBS, the projected benefit obligation for these plans was $14.2 million. Pension expense for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2004 consisted of the following components (dollars in thousands):

Service cost (benefits earned during the — period) $ 67
Interest cost on the accumulated post-
retirement benefit obligation 226
Expected return on plan assets (42 )
Total pension expense $ 251

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Prior to our acquisition of NEBS, the SERP was unfunded and the Canadian pension plan was partially funded. During the third quarter of 2004, we fully funded the SERP obligation with investments in company-owned life insurance policies. The cash surrender value of these policies is included in long-term investments in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004 and totals $9.5 million. Also during the third quarter of 2004, we made cash contributions of $0.9 million to the Canadian plan. We plan to contribute additional cash of $0.5 million to this plan during the fourth quarter of 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 13: eFunds indemnification

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In connection with the spin-off of our former eFunds segment on December 29, 2000, we agreed to indemnify eFunds for future losses arising from any litigation based on the conduct of eFunds’ electronic benefits transfer and medical eligibility verification business prior to eFunds’ initial public offering in June 2000, and for certain future losses on identified loss contracts in excess of eFunds’ accrual for contract losses as of April 30, 2000. The maximum contractual amount of litigation and contract losses for which we would indemnify eFunds is $14.6 million. This agreement remains in effect until one year after the termination of the identified loss contracts or until all disputes have been settled. All identified loss contracts are scheduled to expire by 2006. Through September 30, 2004, no amounts have been paid or claimed under

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

17

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

this indemnification agreement. This obligation is not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets, as it is not probable that any payment will occur.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 14: Shareholders’ deficit

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Shareholders’ deficit decreased from $298.1 million as of December 31, 2003 to $213.8 million as of September 30, 2004. We are in a deficit position primarily due to our share repurchase programs. Share repurchases are reflected as reductions of shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Under the laws of Minnesota, our state of incorporation, shares which we repurchase are considered to be authorized and unissued shares. Thus, share repurchases are not presented as a separate treasury stock caption in our consolidated balance sheets, but are recorded as direct reductions of additional paid-in capital and retained earnings.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In January 2001, our board of directors approved a plan to purchase up to 14 million shares of our common stock. These repurchases were completed in June 2002 at a cost of $463.8 million. In August 2002, our board of directors approved the repurchase of an additional 12 million shares. These repurchases were completed in September 2003 at a cost of $503.2 million. In August 2003, the board authorized the repurchase of up to 10 million additional shares of our common stock. Through September 30, 2004, 2.1 million of these additional shares had been repurchased at a cost of $85.0 million.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

18

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Changes in shareholders’ deficit during the first nine months of 2004 were as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):

Unearned compensation Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1) Total shareholders’ deficit
Number of shares Par value
Balance, December 31, 2003 50,173 $ 50,173 $ — $ (345,950 ) $ (41 ) $ (2,265 ) $ (298,083 )
Net income — — — 151,155 — — 151,155
Cash dividends — — — (55,701 ) — — (55,701 )
Common shares issued 717 717 17,196 — — — 17,913
Tax benefit of stock
options — — 2,804 — — — 2,804
Common shares
repurchased (634 ) (634 ) (11,496 ) (13,390 ) — — (25,520 )
Other common shares
retired (33 ) (33 ) (1,391 ) — — — (1,424 )
Fair value of employee
stock-based compensation 2 2 8,617 — 41 — 8,660
Loss on derivatives, net of tax — — — — — (14,613 ) (14,613 )
Translation adjustment, net of tax — — — — — 1,119 1,119
Unrealized loss on securities,
net of tax — — — — — (87 ) (87 )
Balance, September 30, 2004 50,225 $ 50,225 $ 15,730 $ (263,886 ) $ — $ (15,846 ) $ (213,777 )
(1) Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):
Balance, December 31, 2003 Loss on derivatives — $ (2,265 ) Cumulative translation adjustment — $ — Unrealized loss on securities — $ — Accumulated other comprehensive loss — $ (2,265 )
Amortization of loss on derivatives 190 — — 190
Unrealized loss on derivatives (14,803 ) — — (14,803 )
Translation adjustment — 1,119 — 1,119
Unrealized loss on securities — — (87 ) (87 )
Balance, September 30, 2004 $ (16,878 ) $ 1,119 $ (87 ) $ (15,846 )

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Note 15: Business segment information

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Prior to the acquisition of NEBS (see Note 3), we operated three business segments: Financial Services, Direct Checks and Business Services. Financial Services sells checks, related products and check merchandising services to financial institutions. Direct Checks sells checks and related products directly to consumers through direct mail and the Internet. Business Services sells checks, forms and related products to small businesses and home offices through financial institution referrals, business alliances and via direct mail and the Internet. All three of these segments operate only in the United States. We have not yet completed our evaluation as to how NEBS various lines of business will be incorporated into our reportable business segments. Until this evaluation is completed, we will manage and monitor NEBS as a separate segment. NEBS operates primarily in the United States, but also has operations in Canada, the United Kingdom and France.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies as presented in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in our

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

19

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Corporate expenses are allocated to three of our segments based on segment revenues. No corporate expenses are allocated to NEBS, as their operations have not yet been integrated into our corporate functions. The corporate allocation includes expenses for various support activities such as executive management, human resources and finance and includes depreciation and amortization expense related to corporate assets. The corresponding corporate asset balances are not allocated to the segments. Corporate assets consist primarily of cash, deferred tax assets, investments and internal-use software related to corporate activities.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We are an integrated enterprise, characterized by substantial intersegment cooperation, cost allocations and the sharing of assets. Therefore, we do not represent that these segments, if operated independently, would report the operating income and other financial information shown.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The following is our segment information as of and for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):

Reportable business segments — Financial Services Direct Checks Business Services NEBS Corporate Consolidated
Revenue from external customers: 2004 $ 174,798 $ 68,889 $ 64,465 $ 176,813 $ — $ 484,965
2003 176,328 75,105 63,436 — — 314,869
Operating income: 2004 52,489 22,950 21,701 3,607 — 100,747
2003 40,984 24,069 22,609 — — 87,662
Depreciation and amortization
expense: 2004 11,037 2,655 1,374 17,348 — 32,414
2003 11,332 2,030 1,391 — — 14,753
Total assets: 2004 239,922 137,035 31,134 1,001,517 151,571 1,561,179
2003 276,234 147,885 33,245 — 100,556 557,920
Capital purchases: 2004 1,764 1,083 252 1,038 8,352 12,489
2003 1,843 682 206 — 2,628 5,359

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Indent" FSL="Default"

The following is our segment information as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):

Reportable business segments — Financial Services Direct Checks Business Services NEBS Corporate Consolidated
Revenue from external customers: 2004 $ 508,675 $ 217,009 $ 192,941 $ 184,551 $ — $ 1,103,176
2003 527,123 231,641 182,859 — — 941,623
Operating income: 2004 129,730 65,322 63,528 3,813 — 262,393
2003 113,961 78,730 57,494 — — 250,185
Depreciation and amortization
expense: 2004 33,069 7,561 4,462 17,902 — 62,994
2003 33,974 5,987 4,180 — — 44,141
Total assets: 2004 239,922 137,035 31,134 1,001,517 151,571 1,561,179
2003 276,234 147,885 33,245 — 100,556 557,920
Capital purchases: 2004 6,152 2,270 514 1,038 16,203 26,177
2003 6,598 2,002 1,118 — 5,954 15,672

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

20

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Default" FSL="Default"

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Company Profile

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We are the largest provider of checks in the United States, both in terms of revenue and number of checks produced. We design, manufacture and distribute a comprehensive line of printed checks. In addition to checks, we also offer other personalized printed items (e.g., business forms, business cards, stationery, greeting cards, labels, and shipping and packaging supplies), promotional products and merchandising materials, fraud prevention services and customer retention programs. On June 25, 2004, we acquired New England Business Service, Inc. (NEBS). NEBS is a leading provider of products and services to small businesses. We believe NEBS is a strategic fit, as we both serve small business customers, and the acquisition expands our product offerings, customer base and non-check revenue.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Prior to the acquisition of NEBS, we operated three business segments: Financial Services, Direct Checks and Business Services. Financial Services sells checks, related products and check merchandising services to approximately 8,000 financial institution clients nationwide, including banks, credit unions and financial services companies. Direct Checks is the nation’s leading direct-to-consumer check supplier, selling under the Checks Unlimited® and Designer® Checks brands. Through these two brands, Direct Checks sells personal and business checks, as well as related products, using direct response marketing and the Internet. Business Services sells checks, forms and related products to small businesses and home offices through financial institution referrals, business alliances and via direct mail and the Internet. All three of these segments operate only in the United States. We have not yet completed our evaluation as to how NEBS various lines of business will be incorporated into our reportable business segments. Until this evaluation is completed, we will manage and monitor NEBS as a separate segment. NEBS operates primarily in the United States, but also has operations in Canada, the United Kingdom and France.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our two largest product groups, checks and business forms, are mature products. According to our estimates, the total number of personal, business and government checks written in the United States has been in decline since the mid-1990s as a result of alternative payment methods, such as debit cards, smart cards, electronic and other bill paying services and Internet-based payment services. However, a 2002 Federal Reserve study reported that the check is still Americans’ preferred method of non-cash payment, accounting for approximately 60% of all non-cash payments. Another Federal Reserve update to be published in November is expected to provide more insight into check volumes. The business forms product has also reached maturity. Continual technological improvements have provided small business customers with alternative means to enact and record business transactions. For example, the price and performance capabilities of personal computers and related printers now provide a cost effective means to print low quality versions of business forms on plain paper. Additionally, electronic transaction systems and off-the-shelf business software applications have been designed to automate several of the functions performed by business forms products.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Because our products are mature, we have been encountering significant pricing pressure when negotiating contracts with our financial institution clients. Our relationships with specific financial institutions are usually formalized through supply contracts. This pricing pressure has resulted in reduced profit margins, and we expect this trend to continue.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our Direct Checks segment and portions of our newly acquired NEBS business have been impacted by reduced consumer response rates to direct mail advertisements. We believe that the decline in consumer response rates is attributable to the decline in check usage, the gradual obsolescence of our standardized forms products and an overall increase in direct mail solicitations received by our target customers. Because each advertisement is resulting in fewer new customers, the cost to acquire each new customer has increased. We have also been impacted by a lengthening of the check reorder cycle due to the decline in check usage and the multi-box promotional strategies which are standard practice for direct mail sellers of checks.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

To offset all of these challenges, we have focused on increasing revenue per unit by improving our selling techniques and introducing new product offerings. We have also taken steps to lower our cost structure.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

21

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In Financial Services, we have implemented the DeluxeSelect SM program. This program allows us to interact directly with the customers of financial institutions and to leverage our extensive market research and knowledge of consumer behaviors and preferences. As of September 30, 2004, over 4,800 financial institutions had enrolled in DeluxeSelect. Our Financial Services segment intends to target financial institution clients that understand the value we provide. We provide high quality products, superior service, enhanced customer satisfaction and the check program management skills which lead to improved revenue and profitability for financial institutions. In Direct Checks, we have encouraged consumers to place their orders by phone, where our sales associates have the opportunity to interact with the consumer. During the first nine months of 2004, 28% of first-time customers placed their orders via the telephone, as compared to 16% in the first nine months of 2003. In Business Services, we have partnered with our financial institution clients to increase the use of our financial institution referral program. Under this program, our financial institution clients refer their small business customers to us at the time of new account opening. This allows us direct interaction with the small business customer. Additionally, Business Services has established business alliances under which consumers interact directly with us when ordering checks and related products. We have also provided extensive training to our Business Services sales associates to transition that organization from a service to a selling environment. All of these efforts have led to increased sales of premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added products and services such as fraud prevention and express delivery. Additionally, through the NEBS acquisition, we will have the ability to introduce products across channels, thereby enhancing our product and service offerings to small businesses. To combat the reduced consumer response rates to direct mail advertisements within the Direct Checks and NEBS businesses, we continually analyze our marketing approach to ensure we utilize the most effective media sources.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We continue to be cost conscious so that we are able to compete as the decline in check usage and pricing pressure continue. We have closed three check printing facilities this year and will close three additional facilities in the fourth quarter of 2004, including one NEBS facility. We have also implemented other employee reductions in recent quarters. The application of lean principles in our manufacturing area has resulted in increased efficiencies, and we are applying these principles throughout the rest of the company. We continue to closely manage spending and seek additional cost saving opportunities wherever possible. Additionally, in integrating NEBS businesses, we plan to realize cost synergies exceeding $25 million annually beginning in 2005. We expect to realize these synergies through eliminating redundancies, leveraging our shared services environment and enhancing productivity by implementing lean principles and sharing best practices.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Recent economic indicators have been somewhat promising, and our 2004 results have not been negatively impacted by economic conditions as they were in 2003. Consumer spending began improving in the second half of 2003 and has continued to improve through the first nine months of 2004. Additionally, the employment growth that began in the first quarter of this year has continued through September. However, it is important to note that September payrolls fell short of expectations and employment is still down more than one million jobs from its pre-recession peak. There is a correlation between employment and the rate at which consumers open checking accounts. Thus, the employment rate is a key factor for the check printing portion of the payments industry. Our Business Services and NEBS segments are also impacted by small business confidence. All trends in this area are positive. The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) reported that small business sales levels, employment and capital spending are all trending upwards, as is the NFIB’s measure of small business optimism. We will continue to monitor the impact these economic conditions are having on our business.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Even with the challenges we face with our mature products, checks and business forms printing continues to be a profitable business for us. We generated operating cash flows of $213.5 million during the first nine months of 2004 and $181.5 million during full year 2003. We believe our stable cash flows and our focus on cost management and operational excellence will allow us to maintain our leadership position in the check printing portion of the payments industry. We were able to complete the NEBS acquisition during the second quarter of 2004 utilizing our debt capacity. We have also utilized debt proceeds to repurchase our common shares over the past several years. During 2003 and the first half of 2004, we repurchased 12.8 million shares. We have also continued to pay dividends at an annual rate of $1.48 per share, resulting in a dividend yield of 3.6% based on our September 30, 2004 closing stock

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

22

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

price. We believe we have sufficient financial resources to pursue additional acquisitions that leverage our core competencies and are accretive to earnings and cash flow, to strengthen our leading position in the markets in which we compete and to expand into closely related or adjacent products and services.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Acquisition of New England Business Service, Inc.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As discussed earlier under Company Profile , on June 25, 2004, we acquired via a tender offer approximately 98% of the outstanding common stock of NEBS for $44 per share. Immediately following the close of the tender offer, we completed a merger under which NEBS became a wholly-owned subsidiary and we became obligated to pay for the untendered shares at a price of $44 per share. We also agreed to redeem all outstanding NEBS stock options for $44 per option share less the option exercise price. As of September 30, 2004, a portion of the direct costs of the acquisition had not been paid and were included in accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. We anticipate that substantially all of these payments will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2004. The total purchase price for the acquisition was comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

Cash payments for NEBS common stock $
Cash payments to redeem NEBS stock options 44,087
Direct costs of the acquisition 10,161
Total purchase price $ 639,600
Amount paid through September 30, 2004 $ 638,231
Cash acquired from NEBS (14,681 )
Payments for acquisition through September 30,
2004, net of cash acquired $ 623,550

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As of September 30, 2004, we had $0.8 million of restricted cash. Upon the acquisition of NEBS, we were required to place on deposit the funds required to pay the shareholders who did not tender their shares of NEBS common stock under the tender offer. These shareholders must present their stock certificates in order to receive their portion of the funds. The funds must remain on deposit for a period of nine months, after which time the funds will be returned to us, and thereafter, any remaining unclaimed funds will be remitted to the appropriate governmental authority under applicable escheat laws.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

NEBS operating results are included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition. Our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004 reflects the allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. This allocation is preliminary, pending the completion of detailed analyses and outside appraisals of the fair values of the assets acquired, as well as completion of management’s integration plans. Once these analyses and appraisals have been completed, the allocation of the purchase price will be finalized. We have announced our intention to utilize a shared services environment approach for both manufacturing and certain selling, general and administrative (SG&A) functions. This approach will most likely result in the exit of certain activities. However, to ensure that we continue to meet customer expectations, significant analysis is required before all such plans can be finalized. To the extent the activities to be discontinued are NEBS activities, we would adjust the preliminary purchase price allocation to reflect additional restructuring liabilities. If the discontinued activities are Deluxe activities, any restructuring accruals would be reflected in our consolidated statements of income. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price does reflect $20.5 million of restructuring accruals for those NEBS activities which we have already decided to exit. These accruals are discussed in Other Matters .

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

23

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $445.5 million. We believe that the NEBS acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because of its industry position, the potential to introduce products across multiple channels and the ability to realize cost synergies. The following illustrates our preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (dollars in thousands):

Cash and cash equivalents $
Trade accounts receivable 71,563
Inventories and supplies 41,729
Deferred income taxes 21,370
Other current assets 14,732
Long-term investments 2,974
Property, plant and equipment 54,816
Assets held for sale 2,208
Intangibles 333,883
Goodwill 445,450
Other non-current assets 8,420
Accounts payable (34,729 )
Accrued liabilities (81,963 )
Long-term debt due within one year (10,417 )
Long-term debt (155,203 )
Deferred income taxes (86,902 )
Other non-current liabilities (3,012 )
Total purchase price $ 639,600

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Indent" FSL="Default"

Our preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulted in the recognition of the following intangible assets (dollars in thousands):

Amount
Indefinite lives:
Tradenames $ 151,200
Amortizable intangibles:
Customer lists 103,900 6.3 years
Distributor contracts 30,900 9.0 years
Internal-use software 25,483 3.6 years
Tradenames 16,100 5.0 years
Bank referral agreements 6,300 11.0 years
Total amortizable intangibles 182,683 6.5 years
Total intangible assets acquired $ 333,883

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Amortizable tradenames and software are being amortized on the straight-line basis. The other amortizable intangible assets are being amortized using accelerated methods. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we recorded amortization of NEBS intangibles of $13.1 million. The amount assigned to intangible assets acquired, as well as the related amortization periods, may change once our detailed analyses and outside asset appraisals are completed.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

24

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The following unaudited, pro forma financial information illustrates our estimated results of operations as if the acquisition of NEBS had occurred as of the beginning of each period presented (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Revenue $ 484,965 $ 489,892 $ 1,453,314 $ 1,464,077
Net income 57,505 55,321 137,978 131,503
Earnings per share:
Basic $ 1.15 $ 1.05 $ 2.75 $ 2.36
Diluted 1.14 1.03 2.73 2.33

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

NEBS results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 included goodwill and asset impairment charges of $13.2 million related to their apparel business. Theses charges are reflected in the above pro forma results of operations. The pro forma results of operations are presented for comparative purposes only. They do not represent the results which would have been reported had the acquisition occurred on the dates assumed and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

To finance the acquisition, we utilized $475.0 million of an $800.0 million bridge financing agreement, as well as commercial paper. During the third quarter of 2004, we increased our commercial paper program from $500.0 million to $1.0 billion and utilized commercial paper to pay-off the bridge financing. On October 1, 2004, we issued $600.0 million of long-term debt and subsequently canceled the bridge financing agreement. The net proceeds from this debt of $595.6 million were utilized to pay outstanding commercial paper. As such, $595.6 million of commercial paper debt is presented as long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004. Further details concerning the long-term debt issued can be found in Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition. On October 7, 2004, we reduced our commercial paper program back to $500.0 million.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

25

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Results of Operations – Quarter Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the relative composition of selected statement of income data (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30,
2004 2003
$ % of revenue $ % of revenue
Revenue from external customers:
Financial Services $ 174,798 36.0 % $ 176,328 56.0 %
Direct Checks 68,889 14.2 % 75,105 23.9 %
Business Services 64,465 13.3 % 63,436 20.1 %
NEBS 176,813 36.5 % — —
Total $ 484,965 100.0 % $ 314,869 100.0 %
Gross profit 314,445 64.8 % 208,895 66.3 %
Selling, general and administrative
expense 213,744 44.1 % 120,914 38.4 %
Asset impairment and net
disposition (gains) losses (46 ) — 319 0.1 %
Operating income (1) :
Financial Services $ 52,489 30.0 % $ 40,984 23.2 %
Direct Checks 22,950 33.3 % 24,069 32.0 %
Business Services 21,701 33.7 % 22,609 35.6 %
NEBS 3,607 2.0 % — —
Total $ 100,747 20.8 % $ 87,662 27.8 %
Earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization of
intangibles (EBITDA) (2) $ 133,179 27.5 % $ 101,991 32.4 %

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

See note 15 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report for discussion of the accounting policies of our reportable business segments.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Hang Level 1" FSL="Default"

(1) Segment percentages represent segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenue from external customers.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Hang Level 1" FSL="Default"

(2) EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We disclose EBITDA because it can be used to analyze profitability between companies and industries by eliminating the effects of financing (i.e., interest) and capital investments (i.e., depreciation and amortization). We continually evaluate EBITDA, as we believe that an increasing EBITDA depicts increased ability to attract financing and increases the valuation of our business. We do not consider EBITDA to be a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Instead, we believe that EBITDA is a useful performance measure which should be considered in addition to those measures reported in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is derived from net income as follows (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Net income $ 57,505 $ 58,182
Provision for income taxes 34,939 24,197
Interest expense, net 8,321 4,859
Depreciation 9,266 5,194
Amortization of intangibles 23,148 9,559
EBITDA $ 133,179 $ 101,991

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

26

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Revenue — Revenue increased $170.1 million, or 54.0%, to $485.0 million for the third quarter of 2004 compared to $314.9 million for the third quarter of 2003. The NEBS acquisition contributed revenue of $176.8 million for the third quarter of 2004. The $6.7 million decline for our other businesses was due to a 7.3% decrease in unit volume as compared to 2003. Revenue was impacted by the overall decline in the number of checks being written due to the increasing use of alternative payment methods. Our Direct Checks segment was also impacted by lower direct mail consumer response rates, longer reorder cycles due to promotional strategies for multi-box orders and lower customer retention. Partially offsetting the volume decline was an increase in revenue per unit of 2.9% as compared to 2003 and a $7.7 million contract buy-out. The increase in revenue per unit was due to continued strength in selling premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added products and services such as express delivery and fraud prevention, as well as price increases in our Direct Checks and Business Services segments. Partially offsetting these increases was continuing competitive pricing pressure within our Financial Services segment.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Gross profit — Gross profit increased $105.5 million, or 50.5%, to $314.4 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $208.9 million for the third quarter of 2003. Gross margin decreased to 64.8% for the third quarter of 2004 from 66.3% for the third quarter of 2003. The impact of NEBS lower margin business and the continued pricing pressure facing our Financial Services segment were partially offset by the $7.7 million contract buy-out and our continued strength in selling premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added products and services, as well as continued productivity improvements and on-going cost management efforts.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense — SG&A expense increased $92.8 million, or 76.8%, to $213.7 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $120.9 million for the third quarter of 2003. The increase was due to NEBS SG&A expense, including $4.4 million of integration costs, higher employee performance-based compensation expense and a $2.7 million increase in stock-based compensation expense. In January 2004 we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Further information concerning this change in accounting principle can be found under Other Matters . Partially offsetting these increases were cost management efforts, including savings realized from the employee reductions announced during the last year, lower discretionary spending and a $2.4 million decrease in Direct Checks advertising expense due to the timing and amount of promotional spending. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense increased to 44.1% for the third quarter of 2004 from 38.4% for the third quarter of 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Interest expense — Interest expense increased $4.0 million to $8.9 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $4.9 million for the third quarter of 2003. The increase was due to the additional debt required to finance the acquisition of NEBS, partially offset by lower interest rates. During the third quarter of 2004, we had weighted-average debt outstanding of $1,313.6 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 2.57%. During the third quarter of 2003, we had weighted-average debt outstanding of $516.6 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.39%.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Provision for income taxes — Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2004 increased to 37.8% from 29.4% for the third quarter of 2003. During the third quarter of 2003, we reversed $7.3 million of previously established income tax reserves. A prior year federal audit period was closed due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, and we reached agreements with two states to favorably settle proposed income tax audit assessments. As a result, the related reserves were no longer required. Excluding these reserve reversals, our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2003 would have been 38.2%.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Net income — Net income decreased $0.7 million, or 1.2%, to $57.5 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $58.2 million for the third quarter of 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the reversal of income tax reserves in 2003 and higher interest expense in 2004, partially offset by the $7.7 million contract buy-out, as well as manufacturing productivity improvements and cost management efforts.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Diluted earnings per share — Despite the decrease in net income, diluted earnings per share increased $0.05, or 4.6%, to $1.14 for the third quarter of 2004 from $1.09 for the third quarter of 2003. The increase was due to the net decrease in average shares outstanding resulting from our share repurchase programs. In August 2002, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of 12 million shares of our common stock and in August 2003, the board authorized the repurchase of up to 10 million additional

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

27

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

shares. Through September 30, 2004, 14.1 million shares had been repurchased under these authorizations. The change in average shares outstanding resulting from share repurchases, partially offset by the impact of shares issued under employee stock purchase and stock incentive plans, resulted in a $0.06 increase in earnings per share for the third quarter of 2004 as compared to 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During 2003, we accounted for our employee-stock based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees . Accordingly, our 2003 results of operations do not include compensation expense for stock options or for our employee stock purchase plan. Had this expense been included in our results, diluted earnings per share would have been $0.02 lower for the third quarter of 2003. On January 1, 2004, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. As a result, our 2004 results include compensation expense for all employee stock-based compensation. Further information concerning this change in accounting principle can be found under Other Matters .

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

28

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Results of Operations – Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the relative composition of selected statement of income data (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
$ % of revenue $ % of revenue
Revenue from external customers:
Financial Services $ 508,675 46.1 % $ 527,123 56.0 %
Direct Checks 217,009 19.7 % 231,641 24.6 %
Business Services 192,941 17.5 % 182,859 19.4 %
NEBS 184,551 16.7 % — —
Total $ 1,103,176 100.0 % $ 941,623 100.0 %
Gross profit 722,905 65.5 % 619,108 65.7 %
Selling, general and administrative
expense 460,479 41.7 % 368,815 39.2 %
Asset impairment and net
disposition losses 33 — 108 —
Operating income (3) :
Financial Services $ 129,730 25.5 % $ 113,961 21.6 %
Direct Checks 65,322 30.1 % 78,730 34.0 %
Business Services 63,528 32.9 % 57,494 31.4 %
NEBS 3,813 2.1 % — —
Total $ 262,393 23.8 % $ 250,185 26.6 %
Earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization of
intangibles (EBITDA) (4) $ 326,058 29.6 % $ 293,468 31.2 %

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

See note 15 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report for discussion of the accounting policies of our reportable business segments.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Hang Level 1" FSL="Default"

(3) Segment percentages represent segment operating income as a percentage of segment revenue from external customers.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Hang Level 1" FSL="Default"

(4) EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. We disclose EBITDA because it can be used to analyze profitability between companies and industries by eliminating the effects of financing (i.e., interest) and capital investments (i.e., depreciation and amortization). We continually evaluate EBITDA, as we believe that an increasing EBITDA depicts increased ability to attract financing and increases the valuation of our business. We do not consider EBITDA to be a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Instead, we believe that EBITDA is a useful performance measure which should be considered in addition to those measures reported in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is derived from net income as follows (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Net income $ 151,155 $ 153,053
Provision for income taxes 93,407 82,377
Interest expense, net 18,502 13,897
Depreciation 19,132 16,445
Amortization of intangibles 43,862 27,696
EBITDA $ 326,058 $ 293,468

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

29

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Revenue — Revenue increased $161.6 million, or 17.2%, to $1,103.2 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $941.6 million for the first nine months of 2003. The NEBS acquisition contributed revenue of $184.6 million for the first nine months of 2004. The $23.0 million decrease for our other businesses was due to a 5.1% decline in unit volume as compared to 2003 due to an overall decline in the number of checks being written as a result of the increasing use of alternative payment methods. Our Direct Checks segment was also impacted by lower direct mail consumer response rates, longer reorder cycles due to promotional strategies for multi-box orders and lower customer retention. These decreases in unit volume were partially offset by increased financial institution referrals for our Business Services segment. Partially offsetting the unit decline was a 1.9% increase in revenue per unit as compared to 2003 and a $7.7 million contract buy-out. The increase in revenue per unit was due to continued strength in selling premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added products and services such as express delivery and fraud prevention, as well as price increases in our Direct Checks and Business Services segments. These increases were partially offset by increased competitive pricing pressure within our Financial Services segment.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Gross profit — Gross profit increased $103.8 million, or 16.8%, to $722.9 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $619.1 million for the first nine months of 2003. Gross margin decreased to 65.5% for the first nine months of 2004 from 65.7% for the first nine months of 2003. The impact of the lower margin NEBS business and the continued pricing pressure facing our Financial Services segment were partially offset by our continued strength in selling premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added products and services, as well as continued productivity improvements and on-going cost management efforts.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense — SG&A expense increased $91.7 million, or 24.9%, to $460.5 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $368.8 million for the first nine months of 2003. The increase was primarily due to NEBS SG&A expense, including $5.8 million of acquisition and integration expenses, a $7.2 million increase in stock-based compensation and a $5.5 million increase in Direct Checks advertising expense due to new product launches, higher cost per customer acquisition and the timing of promotional spending. In January 2004, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Further information concerning this change in accounting principle can be found under Other Matters . Partially offsetting these increases were our cost management efforts, including savings realized from the employee reductions announced during the last year, and lower discretionary spending. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense increased to 41.7% for the first nine months of 2004 from 39.2% for the first nine months of 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Interest expense — Interest expense increased $5.1 million to $19.3 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $14.2 million for the first nine months of 2003 due to an increase in debt levels resulting from the acquisition of NEBS and share repurchases completed throughout 2003 and the first half of 2004. The higher debt level was partially offset by lower interest rates. During the first nine months of 2004, we had weighted-average debt outstanding of $829.9 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 2.97%. During the first nine months of 2003, we had weighted-average debt outstanding of $435.6 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.82%.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Provision for income taxes — Our effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2004 increased to 38.2% from 35.0% for the first nine months of 2003. During the third quarter of 2003, we reversed $7.3 million of previously established income tax reserves. A prior year federal audit period was closed due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, and we reached agreements with two states to favorably settle proposed income tax audit assessments. As a result, the related reserves were no longer required. Excluding these reserve reversals, our effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2003 would have been 38.1%.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Net income — Net income decreased $1.9 million, or 1.2%, to $151.2 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $153.1 million for the first nine months of 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the reversal of income tax reserves in 2003 and higher interest expense in 2004, partially offset by manufacturing productivity improvements and cost management efforts.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Diluted earnings per share — Despite the decrease in net income, diluted earnings per share increased $0.28, or 10.3%, to $2.99 for the first nine months of 2004 from $2.71 for the first nine months of 2003. The increase was due to the net decrease in average shares outstanding resulting from our share

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

30

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

repurchase programs. In August 2002, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of 12 million shares of our common stock and in August 2003, the board authorized the repurchase of up to 10 million additional shares. Through September 30, 2004, 14.1 million shares had been repurchased under these authorizations. The change in average shares outstanding resulting from share repurchases, partially offset by the impact of shares issued under employee stock purchase and stock incentive plans, resulted in a $0.32 increase in earnings per share for the first nine months of 2004 as compared to 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During 2003, we accounted for our employee-stock based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees . Accordingly, our 2003 results of operations do not include compensation expense for stock options or for our employee stock purchase plan. Had this expense been included in our results, diluted earnings per share would have been $0.04 lower for the first nine months of 2003. On January 1, 2004, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. As a result, our 2004 results include compensation expense for all employee stock-based compensation. Further information concerning this change in accounting principle can be found under Other Matters .

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Segment Disclosures

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Additional information regarding our business segments appears in note 15 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Financial Services — Financial Services sells checks, related products and check merchandising services to financial institutions. Additionally, we offer enhanced services to our financial institution clients, such as customized reporting, file management, expedited account conversion support and fraud prevention. The following table shows the results of this segment for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Revenue $ 174,798 $ 176,328 $ 508,675 $ 527,123
Operating income 52,489 40,984 129,730 113,961
% of revenue 30.0% 23.2% 25.5% 21.6%

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Financial Services revenue decreased $1.5 million, or 0.9%, to $174.8 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $176.3 million for the third quarter of 2003. The decrease was primarily due to an overall decline in the number of checks being written due to the increasing use of alternative payment methods, as well as competitive pricing pressure. These revenue decreases were partially offset by increased sales of premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added services, as well as a $7.7 million contract buy-out.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Operating income increased $11.5 million, or 28.1%, to $52.5 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $41.0 million for the third quarter of 2003. This increase was the result of productivity improvements and cost management efforts, the $7.7 million contract buy-out and a $2.1 million decrease in cost of goods sold resulting from a change in accounting for inventories. During the third quarter of 2004, we changed the method of accounting for a portion of our inventories from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. This change is discussed further in Other Matters . Partially offsetting these increases was the continuing pricing pressure and lower unit volume discussed earlier, as well as higher employee performance-based compensation expense.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Financial Services revenue decreased $18.4 million, or 3.5%, to $508.7 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $527.1 million for the first nine months of 2003. The decrease was primarily due to competitive pricing pressure and an overall decline in the number of checks being written due to the increasing use of alternative payment methods. These revenue decreases were partially offset by increased sales of premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added services, as well as the timing of client gains and losses.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

31

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Operating income increased $15.7 million, or 13.8%, to $129.7 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $114.0 million for the first nine months of 2003. As for the quarter, this increase was the result of cost management efforts, productivity improvements and lower discretionary spending, partially offset by the revenue decline.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Direct Checks — Direct Checks sells checks and related products directly to consumers through direct mail and the Internet. We use a variety of direct marketing techniques to acquire new customers in the direct-to-consumer channel, including freestanding inserts in newspapers, in-package advertising, statement stuffers and co-op advertising. We also use e-commerce strategies to direct traffic to our websites. Direct Checks sells under the Checks Unlimited and Designer Checks brand names. The following table shows the results of this segment for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Revenue $ 68,889 $ 75,105 $ 217,009 $ 231,641
Operating income 22,950 24,069 65,322 78,730
% of revenue 33.3% 32.0% 30.1% 34.0%

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Direct Checks revenue decreased $6.2 million, or 8.3%, to $68.9 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $75.1 million for the third quarter of 2003. Unit volume decreased from 2003 due to an overall decline in the number of checks being written resulting from the increasing use of alternative payment methods, lower consumer response rates to direct mail advertisements, longer reorder cycles due to our promotional strategies for multi-box orders and lower customer retention. Partially offsetting the volume decline was an increase in revenue per unit due to price increases, the improved effectiveness of our selling techniques and continued strength in selling premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added products and services.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Operating income decreased $1.1 million, or 4.6%, to $23.0 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $24.1 million for the third quarter of 2003. This decrease was primarily due to the revenue decline, partially offset by productivity improvements and a $2.4 million decrease in advertising expense due to the timing and amount of promotional spending.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Direct Checks revenue decreased $14.6 million, or 6.3%, to $217.0 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $231.6 million for the first nine months of 2003. Unit volume decreased from 2003 due to an overall decline in the number of checks being written resulting from the increasing use of alternative payment methods, lower consumer response rates to direct mail advertisements, longer reorder cycles due to our promotional strategies for multi-box orders and lower customer retention. Partially offsetting the volume decline was an increase in revenue per unit due to price increases, the improved effectiveness of our selling techniques and continued strength in selling premium-priced licensed and specialty check designs and additional value-added products and services.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Operating income decreased $13.4 million, or 17.0%, to $65.3 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $78.7 million for the first nine months of 2003. This decrease was due to the revenue decline and a $5.5 million increase in advertising expense due to new product launches, higher cost per customer acquisition and the timing of promotional spending. Additionally, severance charges of $2.1 million contributed to the decrease. Further information concerning the severance charges can be found under Other Matters . These decreases were partially offset by productivity improvements.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

32

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Business Services — Business Services sells checks, forms and related products to small businesses and home offices through financial institution referrals, business alliances and via direct mail and the Internet. Through our business referral program, our financial institution clients refer new small business customers by calling us directly at the time of new account opening. We also use a variety of direct marketing techniques to retain customers. The following table shows the results of this segment for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Revenue $ 64,465 $ 63,436 $ 192,941 $ 182,859
Operating income 21,701 22,609 63,528 57,494
% of revenue 33.7% 35.6% 32.9% 31.4%

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Business Services revenue increased $1.1 million, or 1.6%, to $64.5 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $63.4 million for the third quarter of 2003. The increase resulted primarily from higher unit volume. Financial institution referrals increased due to the timing of client gains and losses and due to our focus on increasing the visibility of this program with our financial institution clients. Partially offsetting this improvement was the overall decline in the number of checks being written due to the increasing use of alternative payment methods.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Operating income decreased $0.9 million, or 4.0%, to $21.7 million for the third quarter of 2004 from $22.6 million for the third quarter of 2003. The decrease was due to the loss of a large financial institution account that used Business Services financial institution referral program, partially offset by our ability to leverage fixed costs as revenues increase, as well as lower discretionary spending.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Business Services revenue increased $10.0 million, or 5.5%, to $192.9 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $182.9 million for the first nine months of 2003. The increase resulted from increased volume from financial institution referrals, as well as improved selling techniques and price increases. Partially offsetting these improvements was the overall decline in the number of checks being written due to the increasing use of alternative payment methods.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Operating income increased $6.0 million, or 10.5%, to $63.5 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $57.5 million for the first nine months of 2003. The increase was due to higher unit volume, lower discretionary spending and price increases.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

NEBS — NEBS is a leading provider of products and services to small businesses. Its offerings include checks, forms, packaging supplies, embossed foil anniversary seals, promotional products and other printed material which are marketed through direct sales, telesales, a direct sales force, dealers, dedicated distributors and the Internet. NEBS also designs, embroiders and sells specialty apparel products through distributors and independent sales representatives. The following table shows the results of this segment for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, — 2004 2003 Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Revenue $ 176,813 $ — $ 184,551 $ —
Operating income 3,607 — 3,813 —
% of revenue 2.0% — 2.1% —

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As discussed earlier, we acquired NEBS on June 25, 2004. As such, NEBS results of operations are included in our operating results from the date of acquisition. NEBS results for the third quarter of 2004 include acquisition-related amortization expense of $9.6 million and integration expenses of $4.4 million.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

33

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As of September 30, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents of $13.9 million. The following table shows our cash flow activity for the first nine months of 2004 and 2003 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated statements of cash flows (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2004 2003
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 213,452 $ 150,949
Net cash used by investing activities (651,313 ) (16,524 )
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 448,328 (255,843 )
Effect of exchange rate change on cash 464 —
Net change in cash and cash equivalents $ 10,931 $ (121,418 )

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $62.6 million to $213.5 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $150.9 million for the first nine months of 2003. The increase was due primarily to a $36.2 million decrease in contract acquisition payments to financial institution clients within the Financial Services segment, a $13.0 million decrease in payments made for profit sharing and pension contributions and the 2003 increase in deferred advertising. Net cash provided by operating activities in the third quarter of 2004 was negatively impacted $18.9 million due to NEBS severance payments, payments due to executive officers under change of control agreements and profit sharing and pension payments related to NEBS pre-acquisition results of operations.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the first nine months of 2004, cash inflows generated from operations were utilized primarily to make income tax payments of $57.6 million, voluntary employee beneficiary association (VEBA) trust contributions of $38.0 million, employee profit sharing and pension contributions of $26.6 million, interest payments of $17.9 million and contract acquisition payments to financial institution clients of $8.3 million. Net proceeds from short-term and long-term debt of $701.0 million, cash provided by operating activities during the first nine months of 2004 of $213.5 million, cash receipts of $17.9 million from shares issued under employee plans and cash on hand of $3.0 million at December 31, 2003, enabled us to make net payments related to the NEBS acquisition of $623.6 million, to make payments on long-term debt of $166.6 million, to pay dividends of $55.7 million, to spend $26.6 million on share repurchases, to purchase capital assets of $26.2 million and to settle interest rate lock agreements for $23.6 million. The payments on long-term debt primarily related to NEBS debt assumed at the time of acquisition.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the first nine months of 2003, cash inflows generated from operations were utilized primarily to make income tax payments of $59.2 million, contract acquisition payments to financial institution clients of $44.6 million, employee profit sharing and pension contributions of $39.6 million and VEBA trust contributions of $32.0 million, as well as to fund changes in deferred advertising costs. The net issuance of $200.1 million of commercial paper, net cash provided by operating activities during the first nine months of 2003 of $150.9 million, cash on hand of $124.9 million as of December 31, 2002, net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $49.8 million and cash receipts of $17.3 million from shares issued under employee plans enabled us to spend $453.2 million on share repurchases, to pay dividends of $61.8 million and to purchase capital assets of $15.7 million.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

34

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We believe that important measures of our financial strength are the ratios of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT (5) ) to interest expense and free cash flow (6) to total debt. We calculate free cash flow as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of capital assets and dividends paid to shareholders. EBIT to interest expense was 13.6 times on a four-quarter trailing basis through September 30, 2004 and 16.5 times for the year ended December 31, 2003. Our committed lines of credit contain covenants requiring a minimum EBIT to interest expense ratio on a four-quarter trailing basis of 3.0 times. The decrease in 2004 was primarily due to higher interest expense resulting from higher debt levels to fund the acquisition of NEBS and to fund share repurchases earlier in the year. This ratio will continue to decrease due to the re-financing of a portion of our short-term debt with higher rate long-term debt and also higher debt levels. Nonetheless, we believe the risk of violating our financial covenants is low as we expect solid profitability and cash flow to continue. The comparable ratio of net income to interest expense was 7.8 times on a four-quarter trailing basis through September 30, 2004 and 10.0 times for the year ended December 31, 2003. Free cash flow to total debt was 10.6% on a four-quarter trailing basis through September 30, 2004 and 13.3% for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the higher debt level as of September 30, 2004, due to financing required for the NEBS acquisition. This impact was partially offset by higher free cash flow due to lower contract acquisition and employee profit sharing and pension payments, as well as the 2003 increase in deferred advertising. The comparable ratio of net cash provided by operating activities to total debt was 18.8% on a four-quarter trailing basis through September 30, 2004 and 30.5% for the year ended December 31, 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As of September 30, 2004, we had $1,295.7 million of debt outstanding. Of this amount, $318.6 million was classified as short-term debt and the remainder was classified as long-term debt. Our short-term debt consisted of outstanding commercial paper. During the third quarter of 2004, we increased the amount of our commercial paper program from $500.0 million to $1.0 billion and utilized commercial paper to pay-off the bridge financing agreement put in place to complete the acquisition of NEBS. During October 2004, the bridge financing agreement was canceled and we reduced our commercial paper program back to $500.0 million. The daily average amount outstanding under the bridge financing agreement during the first nine

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Hang Level 1" FSL="Default"

(5) EBIT is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. By excluding interest and income taxes, this measure of profitability can indicate whether a company’s earnings are adequate to pay its debts. We monitor this measure on an ongoing basis, as we believe it illustrates our operating performance without regard to financing methods, capital structure or income taxes. We do not consider EBIT to be a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Instead, we believe that EBIT is a useful performance measure which should be considered in addition to those measures reported in accordance with GAAP. The measure of EBIT to interest expense illustrates how many times the current year’s EBIT covers the current year’s interest expense. Our committed lines of credit contain covenants requiring a minimum EBIT to interest expense ratio. EBIT is derived from net income as follows (dollars in thousands):

Twelve Months Ended — September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
Net income $ 190,573 $ 192,472
Provision for income taxes 117,939 106,908
Interest expense, net 23,476 18,872
EBIT $ 331,988 $ 318,252

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Hang Level 1" FSL="Default"

(6) Free cash flow is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. We monitor free cash flow on an ongoing basis, as it measures the amount of cash generated from our operating performance after investment initiatives and the payment of dividends. It represents the amount of cash available for interest payments, debt service, general corporate purposes and strategic initiatives. We do not consider free cash flow to be a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Instead, we believe that free cash flow is a useful liquidity measure which should be considered in addition to those measures reported in accordance with GAAP. The measure of free cash flow to total debt is a liquidity measure which illustrates to what degree our free cash flow covers our existing debt. Free cash flow is derived from net cash provided by operating activities as follows (dollars in thousands):

Twelve Months Ended — September 30, 2004 December 31, 2003
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 243,970 $ 181,467
Purchases of capital assets (32,539 ) (22,034 )
Cash dividends paid to shareholders (74,404 ) (80,453 )
Free cash flow $ 137,027 $ 78,980

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

35

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

months of 2004 was $83.2 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 2.07%.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our commercial paper program currently carries a credit rating of A2/P2. This credit rating was downgraded from A1/P1 during the second quarter of 2004 due to the additional debt we issued in conjunction with the acquisition of NEBS. If for any reason we were unable to access the commercial paper markets, we would rely on our committed lines of credit for liquidity. The daily average amount of commercial paper outstanding during the first nine months of 2004 was $361.2 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.45%. As of September 30, 2004, $914.3 million was outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.89%. The daily average amount of commercial paper outstanding during 2003 was $149.4 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.15%. As of December 31, 2003, $213.3 million was outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.11%.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

On October 1, 2004, we issued $600.0 million of long-term notes via a private placement under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The net proceeds from this debt of $595.6 million were utilized to pay outstanding commercial paper. As such, $595.6 million of commercial paper debt is presented as long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004. We issued $325.0 million of senior, unsecured notes which mature on October 1, 2007 and have a coupon rate of 3.5%. We also issued $275.0 million of senior, unsecured notes which mature on October 1, 2014 and have a coupon rate of 5.125%. The notes include covenants that place restrictions on the issuance of debt that would be senior to the notes and the execution of certain sale-leaseback arrangements. We have agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to an exchange offer for the notes, or under certain circumstances, to file a shelf registration statement for the notes.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We also have committed lines of credit which primarily support our commercial paper program. We have a 364-day line of credit for $100.0 million which expires in July 2005 and carries a commitment fee of ten basis points (.10%). We also have two five-year lines of credit. One five-year line of credit is for $175.0 million and expires in August 2007. The other line of credit is for $225.0 million and expires in July 2009. Both five-year lines of credit carry commitment fees of 12.5 basis points (.125%). The credit agreements governing the lines of credit contain customary covenants regarding the ratio of EBIT to interest expense and levels of subsidiary indebtedness. No amounts were drawn on these lines of credit during the first nine months of 2004 or during 2003, and no amounts were outstanding under these lines of credit as of September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

To the extent not needed to support outstanding commercial paper or letters of credit, we may borrow funds under our lines of credit. As of September 30, 2004, $131.8 million was available under our committed lines of credit for borrowing or for support of additional commercial paper, as follows (dollars in thousands):

364-day line of credit Total available — $ 100,000 Amount outstanding — $ — Net available — $ 100,000 July 2005
Five year line of credit 175,000 — 175,000 August 2007
Five year line of credit 225,000 — 225,000 July 2009
Bridge financing line of credit 550,000 — 550,000 May 2005
Total committed lines of credit $ 1,050,000 $ — 1,050,000
Commercial paper outstanding (914,250 )
Letters of credit outstanding (3,989 )
Net available for borrowing as of
September 30, 2004 $ 131,761

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

36

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We also have an uncommitted bank line of credit for $50.0 million available at variable interest rates. No amounts were drawn on this line of credit during the first nine months of 2004 or during 2003, and no amounts were outstanding under this line of credit as of September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Absent certain defined events of default under our committed credit facilities, there are no significant contractual restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In addition to the $595.6 million of commercial paper classified as long-term debt as of September 30, 2004, our long-term debt consisted of $373.4 million of long-term notes, net of discount and $8.0 million due under capital lease obligations. During the third quarter of 2004, as a result of the additional debt we issued to complete the acquisition of NEBS, our long-term credit rating was downgraded to ‘BBB+ (negative outlook)’ from ‘A’ by Standard & Poor’s and was downgraded to ‘Baa1 (stable)’ from ‘A2’ by Moody’s Investors Service. We do not expect these downgrades to impact our ability to borrow and our credit facilities do not have covenants or events of default tied to maintaining our credit rating.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In December 2002, we issued $300.0 million of senior, unsecured notes which mature in December 2012 and have a coupon rate of 5.0%. The proceeds from these notes were used for general corporate purposes, including funding share repurchases, capital asset purchases and working capital.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

On April 30, 2003, we filed a Form S-3 shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This shelf registration allows for the issuance of debt securities, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $500.0 million. The shelf registration statement became effective on July 8, 2003. In September 2003, we issued $50.0 million of medium-term notes. These notes mature in September 2006 and have a coupon rate of 2.75%. In November 2003, we issued $25.0 million of medium-term notes which mature in November 2005 and have an interest rate equal to the 3-month London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus .05%. This interest rate is reset on a quarterly basis.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In August 2003, the board authorized the repurchase of up to 10 million shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2004, we had repurchased 2.1 million shares under this authorization. Although this authorization remains in place, we will most likely not repurchase additional shares in the near future. Instead, we intend to focus on paying off a portion of the debt we issued to complete the NEBS acquisition.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Changes in financial condition – The table included earlier under Acquisition of New England Business Service, Inc . illustrates the preliminary allocation of the NEBS purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Other current assets increased $33.7 million to $53.7 million as of September 30, 2004 from $20.0 million as of December 31, 2003. In addition to the other current assets acquired from NEBS, the increase resulted from contributions made to the VEBA trust which we use to fund employee and retiree medical and severance payments. Contributions of $38.0 million were made to the trust in the first nine months of 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Other non-current assets increased $2.6 million to $160.1 million as of September 30, 2004 from $157.5 million as of December 31, 2003. The increase resulting from the acquisition of NEBS was partially offset by a $9.5 million decrease in contract acquisition costs of our Financial Services segment. Contract acquisition costs are recorded as non-current assets upon contract execution and are amortized, generally on the straight-line basis, as reductions of revenue over the related contract term. Changes in contract acquisition costs during the first nine months of 2004 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Balance, December 31, 2003 $
Cash payments 8,319
Change in accruals 6,343
Amortization (24,152 )
Balance, September 30, 2004 $ 86,595

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The number of checks being written has been in decline since the mid-1990s, contributing to increased competitive pressure when attempting to retain or obtain clients. Beginning in 2001, as competitive pressure intensified, both the number of financial institution clients requiring contract acquisition payments and the amount of the payments increased. Although we anticipate that we will

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

37

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

continue to make contract acquisition payments, we cannot quantify future amounts with certainty. The amount paid is dependent on numerous factors such as the number and timing of contract executions and renewals, the actions of our competitors, overall product discount levels and the structure of up-front product discount payments versus providing higher discount levels throughout the term of the contract. We anticipate that these payments may continue to be a significant use of cash. When the overall discount level provided for in a contract is unchanged, contract acquisition costs do not result in lower net revenue. The impact of these costs is the timing of cash flows. An up-front cash payment is made as opposed to providing higher product discount levels throughout the term of the contract.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Total debt increased $700.8 million to $1,295.7 million as of September 30, 2004 from $594.9 million as of December 31, 2003 due primarily to the financing required to complete the acquisition of NEBS.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Shareholders’ deficit decreased $84.3 million to $213.8 million as of September 30, 2004 from $298.1 million as of December 31, 2003. We are in a deficit position due to the required accounting treatment for share repurchases. During 2001, we repurchased 11.3 million common shares at a cost of $345.4 million; during 2002, we repurchased 3.9 million common shares at a cost of $172.8 million; and in 2003, we repurchased 12.2 million common shares at a cost of $508.2 million. During the first nine months of 2004, we repurchased 0.6 million common shares at a cost of $25.5 million. Given the strength of our financial position, as reflected in our cash flow and coverage ratios such as EBIT to interest expense and free cash flow to total debt, we do not expect our shareholders’ deficit position to result in any adverse reaction from rating agencies or others that would negatively affect our liquidity or financial condition.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Contractual Obligations

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

A table of our contractual obligations was provided in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. During the first quarter of 2004, we renewed a contract with one of our information technology service providers. The original contract had been scheduled to expire in August 2004, and the contractual commitments previously reported included an obligation of $27.6 million for the first eight months of 2004. The new agreement requires us to make payments of $34.2 million per year through 2014. By renewing this contract prior to its expiration, we were able to obtain lower rates for the same services. Additionally, the new agreement results in a $35.5 million increase in the amount previously reported for early contract termination penalties.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As discussed earlier, we acquired NEBS on June 25, 2004. Immediately following the acquisition, we retired $165.1 million of NEBS long-term debt. NEBS remaining debt as of September 30, 2004 consisted of capital lease obligations of $0.4 million. NEBS also has various operating lease and purchase obligations. We are currently completing a detailed analysis and compilation of these obligations.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Contingent Commitments/Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In connection with the spin-off of our former eFunds segment on December 29, 2000, we agreed to indemnify eFunds for future losses arising from any litigation based on the conduct of eFunds’ electronic benefits transfer and medical eligibility verification business prior to eFunds’ initial public offering in June 2000, and for certain future losses on identified loss contracts in excess of eFunds’ accrual for contract losses as of April 30, 2000. The maximum contractual amount of litigation and contract losses for which we would indemnify eFunds is $14.6 million. This agreement remains in effect until one year after the termination of the identified loss contracts or until all disputes have been settled. All identified loss contracts are scheduled to expire by 2006. Through September 30, 2004, no amounts have been paid or claimed under this indemnification agreement. This obligation is not reflected in the consolidated balance sheets, as it is not probable that any payment will occur.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

It has not been our practice to enter into off-balance sheet arrangements. In the normal course of business we periodically enter into agreements that incorporate general indemnification language. These indemnifications encompass such items as intellectual property rights, governmental regulations and/or

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

38

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

employment-related matters. Performance under these indemnities would generally be triggered by a breach of terms of the contract or by a third-party claim. There have historically been no material losses related to such indemnifications, and we do not expect any material adverse claims in the future. We have established a formal contract review process to assist in identifying significant indemnification clauses.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We are not engaged in any transactions, arrangements or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other third parties that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our liquidity, or on our access to, or requirements for capital resources. In addition, we have not established any special purpose entities.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Related Party Transactions

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We entered into no significant related party transactions during the first nine months of 2004 or during 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Critical Accounting Policies

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

A description of our critical accounting policies was provided in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. There were no changes to these accounting policies during the first nine months of 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the first quarter of 2004, we revised the estimated useful lives for certain of our software and production assets, as we anticipate that the assets will be replaced or retired sooner than originally anticipated. The weighted-average useful life for these assets was shortened from 8.0 years to 6.8 years. This change in accounting estimate is expected to result in increased depreciation and amortization expense of $8.5 million in 2004. In the third quarter of 2004, $2.6 million of this additional expense was recorded, and during the nine months ended September 30, 2004, $6.0 million of this additional expense was recorded. Even with this change in accounting estimate, we expect total depreciation and amortization expense in 2004 to be comparable to 2003, excluding the impact of the NEBS acquisition.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Other Matters

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Restructuring charges — During the third quarter of 2004, we recorded restructuring charges of $2.2 million for severance related to the planned closing of our Financial Services check printing facility located in Dallas, Texas and the previously announced closing of our Direct Checks check printing facility located in Anniston Alabama, as well as various employee reductions primarily within our Financial Services segment. The closing of the Dallas facility is primarily due to the loss of a major financial institution client whose contract expires at the end of 2004. Additionally, cost management is one of our strategic objectives, and we are continually seeking ways to lower our cost structure. We anticipate that the Dallas and Anniston facilities will be closed during the fourth quarter of 2004 and the other employee reductions will be completed during the first half of 2005. The related severance payments will be funded by cash from operations. The restructuring charges include estimated severance benefits for 162 employees. The severance benefits for employees in our Anniston facility were accrued over the second and third quarters of 2004, as they are payable under a one-time severance benefit plan. The other employee reductions are payable under our ongoing severance benefit plan and were accrued in their entirety in the third quarter of 2004. Also during the third quarter of 2004, we reversed $0.1 million of previously recorded restructuring accruals due to fewer employees receiving severance benefits than originally estimated. These restructuring charges and reversals are reflected as cost of goods sold of $1.5 million and SG&A expense of $0.6 million in our consolidated statement of income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the first and second quarters of 2004, we recorded restructuring charges of $2.8 million for severance related to the planned closing of our Direct Checks check printing facility located in Anniston, Alabama, as well as reductions within various functional areas within our Direct Checks and Financial Services segments and our corporate support group. The restructuring charges include estimated severance

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

39

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

benefits for 309 employees, including the employees in our Anniston, Alabama facility which is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2004. We expect the other employee reductions to also be substantially completed by the end of the year. Also during the first and second quarters of 2004, we reversed $1.1 million of previously recorded restructuring accruals due to fewer employees receiving severance benefits than originally estimated. The restructuring charges and reversals recorded during 2004 are reflected as cost of goods sold of $1.6 million and SG&A expense of $2.2 million in our consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Thus far in 2004 we have closed three Financial Services check printing facilities located in Indianapolis, Indiana, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Campbell, California. During 2003, we announced other employee reductions across various functional areas within Financial Services and our corporate support group. These reductions were substantially completed during the first quarter of 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As a result of the completed and planned facility closings and other employee reductions, we expect to realize net cost savings of approximately $4 million in cost of goods sold and $17 million in SG&A expense in 2004. Beginning in 2005, we anticipate net cost savings of approximately $23 million in cost of goods sold and $22 million in SG&A expense. Reduced costs consist primarily of labor and facility expenses, such as insurance, taxes, depreciation and maintenance. In addition to a total of $17 million of severance payments, we are also incurring costs related to the closing of facilities such as equipment moves, training and travel. These costs are expensed as incurred, primarily as cost of goods sold, and are expected to total approximately $2 million. Of this amount, $1.1 million was expensed in the first nine months of 2004 and $0.3 million was expensed in 2003. The majority of the remaining expenses will be recognized in the fourth quarter of 2004 as we complete the closure of our Dallas and Anniston facilities. We are also improving our remaining check printing facilities to allow them to handle the increased volume. These improvements, which are expected to total approximately $6 million, will be capitalized and depreciated, primarily as cost of goods sold, over their estimated useful lives. During the first nine months of 2004, $3.2 million was spent on these improvements; and during 2003, we spent $1.4 million.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In conjunction with the acquisition of NEBS, we assumed restructuring accruals of $1.3 million related to NEBS facility closings which were completed prior to the acquisition. Employee severance payments related to these facility closings are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2004, utilizing cash from operations. Additionally, as a result of the acquisition, we recorded restructuring accruals of $20.5 million related to activities of NEBS which will be exited as we combine the two companies and execute a shared services model for both manufacturing and certain SG&A functions. These accruals include severance payments for 283 employees in information services, sales, finance and human resources, as well as employees of NEBS Tucker, Georgia printing facility which we expect to close during the fourth quarter of 2004. This amount also includes payments due to certain NEBS executives under change of control provisions included in their employment agreements, as we eliminate redundancies between the two companies. The related payments are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2005, utilizing cash from operations. As these accruals were included in the liabilities recorded upon acquisition, they are not reflected in our consolidated statements of income. As a result of these employee reductions, we expect to realize cost savings of approximately $1 million in cost of goods sold and $15 million in SG&A expense beginning in 2005.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Employee stock-based compensation — On January 1, 2004, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We are reporting this change in accounting principle using the modified prospective method of adoption described in SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure. Beginning in 2004, our results of operations reflect compensation expense for all employee stock-based compensation, including the unvested portion of previous stock options granted. This is the same amount of compensation expense which would have been recognized had the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 been applied from its original effective date. Prior to 2004, we accounted for our employee stock-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees . Under this method of accounting, no compensation expense was recognized for stock options or for our employee stock purchase plan.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the second quarter of 2004, we implemented changes to our long-term compensation strategy. Rather than using stock options as the exclusive form of long-term incentive, we now utilize a

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

40

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

combination of stock options, performance shares and restricted stock. All such awards are granted under our shareholder-approved stock incentive plan. The level of shares earned under the performance share component is contingent upon the attainment of specific performance targets over a three-year period. The fair value of the performance shares granted is equal to the market price of our stock at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recorded over the three-year performance period based on our estimate of the number of shares which will be earned by the award recipients. In addition, during the second quarter of 2004, we issued 40,404 restricted shares to employees. The fair value of these awards is equal to the market price of our stock at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recorded over the three year vesting period.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Total stock-based compensation expense was $2.9 million for the third quarter of 2004. This expense is reflected as cost of goods sold of $0.2 million and SG&A expense of $2.7 million in our consolidated statement of income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004. For the first nine months of 2004, total stock-based compensation expense was $8.7 million, with $0.7 million reflected in cost of goods sold and $8.0 million reflected in SG&A expense in our consolidated statement of income.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Change in accounting for inventories — On July 1, 2004, we changed the method of accounting for a portion of our inventories. Inventories previously accounted for under the LIFO method will now be accounted for using the FIFO method. This change resulted in a decrease in cost of goods sold of $2.2 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, during the third quarter of 2004, primarily in our Financial Services segment. The impact on previously reported financial statements was not significant enough to warrant restatement of those financial statements to reflect this change. We consider the FIFO method to be preferable. The effect on net income of utilizing the LIFO method is not significantly different than the results that would be obtained using the FIFO method. Thus, the administrative effort of maintaining LIFO accounting records does not result in improved reporting of our results of operations. Additionally, the recently acquired NEBS business utilizes the FIFO method. This change results in a consistent accounting methodology across the company.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

New accounting pronouncement — In May 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 . This FSP outlines the appropriate accounting treatment for the effects of the new Medicare law, including the required financial statement disclosures, and supersedes the previous guidance issued by the FASB in January 2004. The new Medicare law introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare, as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to the Medicare plan. Our retiree medical plans do provide prescription drug coverage which is at least actuarially equivalent to the Medicare plan. Effective April 1, 2004, we have elected to adopt the accounting treatment required by FSP No. FAS 106-2 utilizing the retroactive application method. In accordance with this accounting guidance, we completed a re-measurement of our plan assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2003. The federal subsidy provided for under the new Medicare law resulted in a $9.5 million reduction in our accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2003 and resulted in a $0.7 million reduction in our post-retirement benefit expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Outlook

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Excluding the impact of the newly acquired NEBS business, we expect that 2004 revenue will be down slightly from 2003. For our historical Deluxe businesses, unit volume is expected to decrease as compared to 2003 due to the decline in check usage and lengthening reorder cycles, as well as lower consumer response rates to direct mail advertisements for our Direct Checks segment. However, we expect Business Services to continue benefiting from its business referral program. Under the business referral program, financial institution clients refer their small business customers to us at the time of new account opening.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We anticipate that the decline in unit volume and the continuing pricing pressure faced by Financial Services will be partially offset by steps we are taking to increase revenue per unit, such as the Financial Services DeluxeSelect program, improved selling techniques within Direct Checks and Business Services

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

41

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

and expanded product offerings in all three segments. Additionally, the acquisition of NEBS expands our product offerings, customer base and non-check revenue. We expect NEBS to contribute approximately $200 million of revenue in the fourth quarter of 2004. We also expect that for the full year, NEBS operating income will offset the additional interest expense resulting from the debt we issued to complete the acquisition. We will also continue to focus on value and service. We are committed to focusing on financial institutions who value high quality, superior service and the best experience for their customers. We believe this approach will allow us to retain business and also attract new clients who want to maximize their check programs.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Excluding the impact of NEBS, we anticipate that operating income will be up slightly in 2004 as compared to 2003. As discussed earlier under Other Matters , we expect to realize approximately $21 million of net cost savings in 2004 from the closing of check printing facilities and other employee reductions. We anticipate that these savings will be offset to a large extent by the pricing pressure facing Financial Services and the decline in check usage. We expect diluted earnings per share to be between $0.83 and $0.87 for the fourth quarter of 2004 and approximately $3.85 for the full year.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We anticipate that operating cash flow will exceed $250 million in 2004, compared to $181.5 million in 2003. The increase is due primarily to lower contract acquisition payments to financial institution clients, lower payments for performance-based employee compensation and the 2003 change in deferred advertising and accounts payable.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We expect to spend approximately $40 million on purchases of capital assets during 2004. Approximately $20 million is projected to be devoted to maintaining our business, with the remainder targeted primarily for information technology initiatives.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The 10 million share repurchase authorization approved by our board of directors in August 2003 remains in place. We will most likely not repurchase additional shares in the near future, but will focus on paying off a portion of the debt issued to complete the acquisition of NEBS. We currently have no plans to change our dividend payout level.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Looking forward to 2005, we expect Financial Services revenue to decrease approximately $110 million and operating margin to decrease 4 to 6 percentage points due to the loss of a major financial institution client and continued pricing pressure. As we reported last quarter, after an intense competitive bidding process, we lost a major financial institution client whose contract expires at the end of 2004. We expect these pricing pressures to continue, and while we remain focused on being the low cost producer, it is becoming increasingly difficult to offset all of the revenue loss in the Financial Services segment through our cost management efforts.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We intend to continue seeking cost saving opportunities throughout the company. One example is the implementation of a new sales and distribution system in our order processing and call center operations. This new system will reduce redundancy while standardizing systems and processes. This project is expected to be completed by the end of 2005.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In the meantime, our focus over the next several months will be the successful integration of NEBS. We have announced our intention to utilize a shared services approach for both manufacturing and certain SG&A functions. This approach will most likely result in the exit of certain activities. However, to ensure that we continue to meet customer expectations, significant analysis is required before all such plans can be finalized. We estimate that we will be able to eliminate at least $25 million of costs beginning in 2005, as we take advantage of operational synergies. Additionally, we will be exploring the most effective ways to take maximum advantage of NEBS industry position and the potential to introduce products across multiple channels.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

42

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Cautionary Statement

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Reform Act) provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information. We are filing this cautionary statement in connection with the Reform Act. When we use the words or phrases “should result,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “are expected to,” “targeted,” “will continue,” “will approximate,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission), in our press releases and in oral statements made by our representatives, they indicate forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We want to caution you that any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause them to be wrong. Some of these uncertainties and other factors are discussed below under Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results (many of which have been discussed in prior filings with the Commission). Although we have attempted to compile a comprehensive list of these important factors, we want to caution you that other factors may prove to be important in affecting future operating results. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors, nor can we assess the impact each factor or combination of factors may have on our business.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

You are further cautioned not to place undue reliance on those forward-looking statements because they speak only of our views as of the date the statements were made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Left Bold" FSL="Default"

Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The check printing portion of the payments industry is mature and if it declines faster than expected, it could have a materially adverse impact on our operating results.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Check printing is, and is expected to continue to be, an essential part of our business and the principal source of our operating income. We primarily sell checks for personal and small business use and believe that there will continue to be a substantial demand for these checks for the foreseeable future. However, according to our estimates, the total number of checks written by individuals and small businesses continued to decline slightly in 2003, and the total number of personal, business and government checks written in the United States has been in decline since the mid-1990s. We believe that the number of checks written will continue to decline due to the increasing use of alternative payment methods, including credit cards, debit cards, smart cards, automated teller machines, direct deposit, electronic and other bill paying services, home banking applications and Internet-based payment services. However, the rate and the extent to which alternative payment methods will achieve consumer acceptance and replace checks, whether as a result of legislative developments, personal preference or otherwise, cannot be predicted with certainty. A surge in the popularity of any of these alternative payment methods could have a material, adverse effect on the demand for checks and a material, adverse effect on our business, results of operations and prospects.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We face intense competition in all areas of our business.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Although we are the leading check printer in the United States, we face considerable competition. In addition to competition from alternative payment systems, we also face intense competition from other check printers in our traditional financial institution sales channel, from direct mail sellers of checks, from sellers of business checks and forms, from check printing software vendors and, increasingly, from Internet-based sellers of checks to individuals and small businesses. Additionally, low-price, high volume office supply chain stores offer standardized business forms, checks and related products to small businesses. The corresponding pricing pressure placed on us has been significant and has resulted in reduced profit margins. We expect these pricing pressures to continue to impact our results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors. Continued competition could result in additional price reductions, reduced profit margins, loss of customers and an increase in up-front cash payments to financial institutions upon contract execution or renewal.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

43

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Continuing softness in direct mail response rates could have an adverse impact on our operating results.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our direct-to-consumer businesses, including portions of our newly acquired NEBS business, have experienced declines in response and retention rates related to direct mail promotional materials. We believe that these declines are attributable to a number of factors, including the decline in check usage, the overall increase in direct mail solicitations received by our target customers, the gradual obsolescence of NEBS standardized forms products and in the case of our direct-to-consumer check business, the multi-box promotional strategies employed by us and our competitors. To offset these impacts, we may have to modify and/or increase our marketing and sales efforts, which could result in increased expense. The profitability of our direct-to-consumer businesses depends in large part on our ability to secure adequate advertising media placements at acceptable rates, as well as the consumer response rates generated by such advertising, and there can be no assurances regarding the future cost, effectiveness and/or availability of suitable advertising media. Competitive pressure may inhibit our ability to reflect any of these increased costs in the prices of our products. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to sustain our current levels of profitability in this situation.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Consolidation among financial institutions may adversely affect our ability to sell our products.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The number of financial institutions has declined due to large-scale consolidation in the last few years. In recent months, financial institution consolidation activities have begun to increase once again. Margin pressures arise from such consolidation as merged entities seek not only the most favorable prices formerly offered to the predecessor institutions, but also additional discounts due to the greater volume represented by the combined entity. This concentration greatly increases the importance of retaining our major financial institution clients and attracting significant additional clients in an increasingly competitive environment. The increase in general negotiating leverage possessed by such consolidated entities also presents a risk that new and/or renewed contracts with these institutions may not be secured on terms as favorable as those historically negotiated with these clients. Although we devote considerable efforts toward the development of a competitively priced, high quality suite of products and services for the financial services industry, there can be no assurance that significant financial institution clients will be retained or that the loss of a significant client can be counterbalanced through the addition of new clients or by expanded sales to our remaining clients.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Standardized business forms and related products face technological obsolescence and changing customer preferences.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Continual technological improvements have provided small business customers with alternative means to enact and record business transactions. For example, the price and performance capabilities of personal computers and related printers now provide a cost effective means to print low quality versions of business forms on plain paper. Additionally, electronic transaction systems and off-the-shelf business software applications have been designed to automate several of the functions performed by business forms products. If we are unable to develop new products and services with comparable profit margins, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We face uncertainty with respect to recent and future acquisitions.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We acquired NEBS in June 2004 and may pursue additional acquisitions in the future. We cannot predict whether suitable acquisition candidates can be acquired on acceptable terms or whether any acquired products, technologies or businesses will contribute to our revenues or earnings to any material extent. Significant acquisitions typically result in the incurrence of contingent liabilities or debt, or additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets, and thus, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, the success of any acquisition depends upon our ability to effectively integrate the acquired businesses into ours. The process of integrating acquired businesses involves numerous risks, including, among others, difficulties in assimilating operations and products, diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, risks of operating businesses in which we have limited or no direct prior experience, potential loss of our key employees or key employees of acquired businesses, potential exposure to unknown liabilities and possible loss of our clients and customers or clients and customers of the acquired businesses.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

44

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our failure to successfully implement a project we have undertaken to replace major portions of our existing sales and distribution systems could negatively impact our business.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During 2005, we plan to implement a new sales and distribution system in major portions of our order processing and call center operations. Once implemented, we expect the new system to reduce redundancy while standardizing systems and processes and reduce our costs. This is a significant information systems project with wide-reaching impacts on our internal operations and business. We can provide no assurance that the amount of this investment will not exceed our expectations and result in materially increased levels of expense. There is also no assurance that this initiative will achieve the expected cost savings or result in a positive return on our investment. Additionally, if the new system does not operate as intended, or is not implemented as planned, there could be disruptions in our business which could adversely affect our results.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The success of our apparel business is dependent on our ability to secure reliable inventory sources, as well as the success of the promotional activities of our apparel licensors.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We purchase a majority of our apparel products from manufacturers located outside the United States. In most cases, these same manufacturers supply other apparel companies, many of which are significantly larger than us. Because of their larger size, these apparel companies are able, when necessary, to secure preferential treatment from the manufacturers. The availability of product from these manufacturers can also be adversely impacted by social, political and economic conditions in their respective countries. If a significant disruption in our supply of apparel products were to occur, we can provide no assurance that we would be able to readily locate alternative supply sources at comparable levels of price and quality.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Additionally, our apparel business is dependent on our apparel licensors to adequately promote our licensed brands and protect those brands from infringement. We believe that brand awareness is an important factor to our apparel customers. As such, we sell a majority of our products under nationally-recognized brands licensed from third parties. In each case, the licensor is primarily responsible for promoting its brand and protecting its brand from infringement. The failure of one or more of our licensors to adequately promote or defend their brands could diminish the perceived value of those brands to our customers and result in reduced revenue and profits.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Forecasts involving future results reflect various assumptions that may prove to be incorrect.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

From time to time, our representatives make predictions or forecasts regarding our future results, including, but not limited to, forecasts regarding estimated revenues, earnings or earnings per share. Any forecast regarding our future performance reflects various assumptions which are subject to significant uncertainties, and, as a matter of course, may prove to be incorrect. Further, the achievement of any forecast depends on numerous factors which are beyond our control. As a result, we cannot assure you that our performance will be consistent with any management forecasts or that the variation from such forecasts will not be material and adverse. You are cautioned not to base your entire analysis of our business and prospects upon isolated predictions, and are encouraged to use the entire available mix of historical and forward-looking information made available by us, and other information affecting us and our products and services, including the factors discussed here.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In addition, independent analysts periodically publish reports regarding our projected future performance. The methodologies we employ in arriving at our own internal projections and the approaches taken by independent analysts in making their estimates are likely different in many significant respects. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to advise analysts or the public markets of our views regarding the current accuracy of the published estimates of independent analysts. If you are relying on these estimates, you should pursue your own investigation and analysis of their accuracy and the reasonableness of the assumptions on which they are based.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Economic conditions within the United States could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Downturns in general economic conditions adversely affected our 2003 operating results. Consumer spending, employment levels and small business confidence are a few of the statistics which impact our business, among others. If these economic factors do not continue to show improvement, as they have in recent quarters, we could experience additional declines in our revenue and profitability.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

45

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We may be unable to protect our rights in intellectual property.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property, third parties may infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property or otherwise independently develop substantially equivalent products and services. In addition, designs licensed from third parties account for an increasing portion of our revenues, and there can be no guarantee that such licenses will be available to us indefinitely or on terms that would allow us to continue to be profitable with those products. The loss of intellectual property protection or the inability to secure or enforce intellectual property protection could harm our business and ability to compete. We rely on a combination of trademark and copyright laws, trade secret protection and confidentiality and license agreements to protect our trademarks, software and know-how. We may be required to spend significant resources to protect our trade secrets and monitor and police our intellectual property rights.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We are dependent upon third party providers for certain significant information technology needs.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We have entered into agreements with third party providers for the provision of information technology services, including software development and support services, and personal computer, telecommunications, network server and help desk services. In the event that one or more of these providers is not able to provide adequate information technology services, we would be adversely affected. Although we believe that information technology services are available from numerous sources, a failure to perform by one or more of our service providers could cause a disruption in our business while we obtain an alternative source of supply.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Legislation relating to consumer privacy protection could harm our business.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We are subject to regulations implementing the privacy and information security requirements of the federal financial modernization law known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the Act). The Act requires us to develop and implement policies to protect the security and confidentiality of consumers’ nonpublic personal information and to disclose these policies to consumers before a customer relationship is established and annually thereafter. These regulations could have the effect of foreclosing future business initiatives.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

The Act does not prohibit state legislation or regulations that are more restrictive on the collection and use of data. More restrictive legislation or regulations have been introduced in the past and could be introduced in the future in Congress and the states. We are unable to predict whether more restrictive legislation or regulations will be adopted in the future. Any future legislation or regulations could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations or prospects.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Laws and regulations may be adopted in the future with respect to the Internet, e-commerce or marketing practices generally relating to consumer privacy. Such laws or regulations may impede the growth of the Internet and/or use of other sales or marketing vehicles. As an example, new privacy laws could decrease traffic to our websites, decrease telemarketing opportunities and decrease the demand for our products and services. Additionally, the applicability to the Internet of existing laws governing property ownership, taxation, libel and personal privacy is uncertain and may remain uncertain for a considerable length of time.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We may be subject to sales and other taxes which could have adverse effects on our business.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

In accordance with current federal, state and local tax laws, and the constitutional limitations thereon, we currently collect sales, use or other similar taxes in state and local jurisdictions where our direct-to-consumer businesses have a physical presence. One or more state or local jurisdictions may seek to impose sales tax collection obligations on us and other out-of-state companies which engage in remote or online commerce. Further, tax law and the interpretation of constitutional limitations thereon is subject to change. In addition, any new operations of these businesses in states where they do not currently have a physical presence could subject shipments of goods by these businesses into such states to sales tax under current or future laws. If one or more state or local jurisdictions successfully asserts that we must collect sales or other taxes beyond our current practices, it could have a material, adverse affect on our business.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We may be subject to environmental risks.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Our check printing facilities are subject to many existing and proposed federal and state regulations designed to protect the environment. In some instances, we owned and operated our check printing facilities

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

46

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

before the environmental regulations came into existence. We have sold former check printing facilities to third parties and in some instances have agreed to indemnify the buyer of the facility for certain environmental liabilities. We have obtained insurance coverage related to environmental issues at certain of these facilities. We believe that, based on current information, we will not be required to incur additional material and uninsured expense with respect to these sites, but unforeseen conditions could result in additional exposure at lesser levels.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Left" FSL="Default"

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a result of the borrowing activities used to support our capital structure, maintain liquidity and fund business operations. We do not enter into financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. During the first nine months of 2004, we utilized commercial paper to pay off the bridge financing agreement used to finance the NEBS acquisition, as well as to fund working capital requirements. On October 1, 2004, we refinanced a portion of our commercial paper debt with fixed rate, long-term debt. In addition, we have various lines of credit available and capital lease obligations which are due through 2009. The nature and amount of debt outstanding can be expected to vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. As of September 30, 2004, our total debt was comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

Commercial paper Carrying amount — $ 914,250 Fair value (1) — $ 914,250 1.89 %
Long-term notes maturing December 2012 298,446 299,181 5.00 %
Long-term notes maturing September 2006 50,000 49,500 2.75 %
Long-term notes maturing November 2005 25,000 24,956 1.75 %
Capital lease obligations maturing through
September 2009 7,972 7,972 10.41 %
Total debt $ 1,295,668 $ 1,295,859 2.69 %
(1) Based on quoted market rates as of September 30, 2004, except for
our capital lease obligations which are shown at carrying value.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Based on the outstanding variable rate debt in our portfolio, a one percentage point increase in interest rates would have resulted in additional interest expense of $3.6 million for the first nine months of 2004 and $1.0 million for the first nine months of 2003.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During 2002, we entered into two forward rate lock agreements to effectively hedge, or lock-in, the annual interest rate on $150.0 million of the $300.0 million notes we issued in December 2002. Upon issuance of the notes, these lock agreements were terminated, yielding a deferred pre-tax loss of $4.0 million, which is reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheets. This amount is being reclassified ratably to our statements of income as an increase to interest expense over the ten-year term of the notes.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During 2004, we entered into $450.0 million of forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge, or lock-in, the interest rate on a portion of the $600.0 million debt we issued in October 2004. We terminated these agreements on September 28, 2004, yielding a deferred pre-tax loss of $23.6 million. This loss is reflected, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004 and will be reclassified ratably to our statements of income as an increase to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

As a result of the acquisition of NEBS in June 2004, we are now exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Investments in and loans and advances to foreign subsidiaries and branches, as well as the operations of these businesses, are denominated in foreign currencies. The effect of exchange

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

47

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Flush" FSL="Default"

rate changes is expected to have a minimal impact on our results of operations and liquidity, as NEBS foreign operations represent a relatively small portion of our business.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Left" FSL="Default"

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures — As of the end of the period covered by this report (the Evaluation Date), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

(b) Internal Control over Financial Reporting — No change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with such evaluation during the quarter ended September 30, 2004, has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we completed the acquisition of NEBS on June 25, 2004 and have not completed our documentation and testing of NEBS internal control over financial reporting at this time.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Center Bold" FSL="Default"

PART II–OTHER INFORMATION

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Left" FSL="Default"

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

We are involved in routine litigation incidental to our business, but there are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or to which any of our property is subject.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Left" FSL="Default"

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

During the third quarter of 2004, we did not purchase any of our own equity securities. In August 2003, our board of directors approved an authorization to purchase up to 10 million shares of our common stock. This authorization has no expiration date. We do not intend to purchase additional shares in the near future, as we will focus on paying off our outstanding debt. However, we have not terminated this authorization and may purchase additional shares under this authorization.

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Left" FSL="Default"

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number Description Method of Filing
1.1 Purchase Agreement, dated September 28, 2004, by and
among us and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as representatives of the several initial purchasers
listed in Schedule 1 of the Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on October 4, 2004) *

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

48

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0"

Exhibit Number Description Method of Filing
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 17, 2004,
by and among us, Hudson Acquisition Corporation and New England Business Service, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(d)(1) to the Deluxe Corporation Schedule TO-T filed with the Commission on May 25, 2004) *
3.1 Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990) *
3.2 Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999) *
4.1 Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of January 31,
1997, by and between us and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Rights Agent, which includes as Exhibit A thereto,
the form of Rights Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 on Form 8-A/A-1 (File No. 001-07945)
filed with the Commission on February 7, 1997) *
4.2 Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, entered
into as of January 21, 2000, between us and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association as Rights Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000) *
4.3 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 4, 2002, by and
between us and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. (formerly Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 5, 2002) *
4.4 Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2003, by and between us and
Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. (formerly Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-104858) filed with the Commission on April 30, 2003) *
4.5 Credit Agreement dated as of August 19, 2002, among us, Bank One,
N.A. as administrative agent, The Bank of New York as syndication agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A. as documentation agent and the other
financial institutions party thereto, related to a $175,000,000 5-year revolving credit agreement (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002) *

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

49

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0"

Exhibit Number Description Method of Filing
4.6 Credit Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2004, by and
between us, Bank One, NA, The Bank of New York and Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (b)
to the Deluxe Corporation Schedule TO-T filed with the Commission on May 25, 2004) *
4.7 Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 22, 2004 among us,
Bank One, NA as administrative agent, Credit Suisse First Boston as Syndication Agent, The Bank of New York, the Bank of
Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., and Wachovia Bank, National Association as documentation agents and the other financial institutions party
thereto, related to a $100,000,000 364-day revolving credit agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004) *
4.8 Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 22, 2004 among us,
Bank One, NA as administrative agent, Credit Suisse First Boston as Syndication Agent, The Bank of New York, the Bank of
Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., and Wachovia Bank, National Association as documentation agents and the other financial institutions party
thereto, related to a $225,000,000 5-year revolving credit agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004) *
4.9 Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 1, 2004, by and
among us and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as representatives of the several initial purchasers
listed in Schedule 1 of the Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on October 4, 2004) *
4.10 Officer’s Certificate and Company Order Authorizing $325,000,000
of our Senior Notes due 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on October 4, 2004) *
4.11 Specimen of Rule 144A Notes due 2007 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 4, 2004) *
4.12 Officer’s Certificate and Company Order Authorizing $275,000,000
of our 5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on October 4, 2004) *
4.13 Specimen of Rule 144A Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 4, 2004) *

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

50

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0"

Exhibit Number Description Method of Filing
12 Statement re: Computation of Ratios Filed herewith
31.1 CEO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith
31.2 CFO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith
32 CEO and CFO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Furnished herewith

_______ * Incorporated by reference

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

51

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Major Center Bold" FSL="Default"

SIGNATURES

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Large Indent" FSL="Default"

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

DELUXE CORPORATION (Registrant)
Date: November 4, 2004 /s/ Lawrence J. Mosner
Lawrence J. Mosner
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 4, 2004 /s/ Douglas J. Treff
Douglas J. Treff
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 4, 2004 /s/ Katherine L. Miller
Katherine L. Miller
Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

52

*********** MARKER PAGE="sheet: 0; page: 0" MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Head Minor Center" FSL="Default"

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number Description
12 Statement re: Computation of Ratios
31.1 CEO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 CFO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32 CEO and CFO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

MARKER FORMAT-SHEET="Para Center" FSL="Workstation"

53