DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED — Interim / Quarterly Report 2020

Apr 29, 2020

ASX Release 30 April 2020

March 2020 Quarterly Report

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

DATELINERESOURCES LIMITED

(ACN149105653) ASX Code:DTR

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX:DTR) (“Dateline” or the “Company”), is pleased to provide this Activities Report for the three-month period ending 31 March 2020.

Green Mountain – Colorado USA 100% owned

CAPITALSTRUCTURE

Share Price (29/04/20)$0.002 Shares on issue 8,210million Market Cap $16.4million UnlistedOptions 10million

MAJORSHAREHOLDERS

Southern Cross ExplorationNL 32.5% Mr. Mark JohnsonAO 19.6% National NomineesLtd 15.4%

DIRECTORS & MANAGEMENT

Mark JohnsonAO Chairman

Stephen Baghdadi ManagingDirector

GregHall Non-ExecutiveDirector

Tony Ferguson Non-Executive Director

John Smith CompanySecretary

CONTACT

John Smith Phone:+612 93752353 PostalAddress:P.O.Box 553 South Hurstville NSW2221 Email:info@datelineresources.com.au

During the March quarter, the Company undertook a reconnaissance RC drilling program at the Green Mountain project. The drilling program commenced in late February and had to be finalised by March 14. Due to heavy snow and ice, access was limited to areas immediately adjacent to the Lucky Strike section of the property and on or near existing roads.

The drilling program was designed to obtain information from which further exploration plans could be made. The primary target areas were,

• Rhyolite Porphyry Dyke - for presence of gold

• Lucky Strike quartz vein – for continuity both on strike and dip within the amphibolite

A total of 13 holes were drilled for 970 metres.

Notable intercepts are:

• GM20-003 - 3m of 4.65g/t Au from 54m

• GM20-001 - 36.5m of 0.47g/t Au from 14m

• GM20-011 - 19.8m of 0.48g/t Au from 74m

• GM20-005 - 4.5m of 0.45g/t Au from 51m

• GM20-012 – 6.1M of 0.32g/t Au from 32m

==> picture [402 x 202] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Plan view of drill collar locations

ASX Release 30 April 2020

Rhyolite Porphyry Dyke

As disclosed in the December 2019 quarterly report, a grab sample taken from the surface expression of the Rhyolite Porphyry Dyke returned assay values of 3.75g/t Au. The main Dyke can be traced for over 5km at surface within the Company claim boundary. Follow up drilling was made on an accessible splay off the main dyke to test for mineralisation. Hole GM20-012 was drilled to a depth of 38.1m. A 6.1m section from 32-38.1 metres returned assay values of .32g/t. The hole was terminated within the Dyke and in mineralisation

==> picture [461 x 252] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Cross section for hole GM20-012 looking west

Lucky Strike Vein

Drilling confirmed that the Lucky Strike vein system is open down-dip and on-strike to the east. Five of the RC drill holes intercepted the Lucky Strike vein within the amphibolite. The drilling program found that the Lucky Strike vein is in a wider vein system and several semi-parallel auriferous veins were intersected.

Hole GM20-003 intersected -3m of 4.65g/t Au from 54m

==> picture [461 x 232] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Cross section for hole GM20-003 looking east

2 | ASXRelease 30 April2020

ASX Release 30 April 2020

Wide zones of disseminated gold

Several zones of auriferous, disseminated mineralisation were found within the Lucky Strike vein system. This disseminated mineralisation has a core consisting of pyrites, quartz veinlets, and silicification. Distal to the stronger mineralisation are found lower contents of pyrites and quartz veinlets with chlorites and epidote. The wide zones of auriferous sulphide mineralization near the veins should present good targets for future IP geophysical exploration and drill targeting .

The wider zones intersected are in the amphibolite or in the meta-sediments adjacent and above the mapped and inferred amphibolite.

Figure 4: Cross section looking east hole GM20001 36.5m of .47g.t Au in amphibolite

Figure 5: Cross section looking east hole GM20-011 19.8m of .48g/t Au in metasediments

Additional

• Drilling has confirmed that the top of the amphibolite body plunges rapidly towards the east-southeast as was inferred by the ground magnetics study in 2019.

• The drilling program supports the hypothesis that the vein is best defined within the easterly plunging amphibolite body.

• Downhole multi element geochemistry has found that Ag is the best match for the Au, but that Bi, Sb, W, Pb, Zn, Cd, Mo, Rb and Li all have consistent patterns of association.

The Company will follow up this maiden reconnaissance drilling program with deeper core drilling as soon as it is able to do so.

Gold Links – Colorado USA, 100% owned

In February of 2020, the company applied to the Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety for two 110(2) mining permits for its 100% owned Raymond and Carter properties located at Gold Links Centre and South. The applications were successful, and the permits were granted in April 2020 (See ASX announcement dated April 21, 2020)

The granting of these two additional mining permits gives Dateline a total of six mining permits in the Gunnison district of which five are spread across Gold Links North, Centre and South (Gold Links). In total, the company is now permitted to extract 420,000 tonnes per annum of which Gold Links makes up 350,000 and a further 70,000 tonnes from Green Mountain.

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

3 | ASXRelease 30 April2020

ASX Release 30 April 2020

Historical records show that the majority of gold production within the Gold Links Project area occurred between 1896 and 1942. The Raymond was mined between 1890 and 1906 and again between 1939 and 1941. The Carter was mined up until 1932. Documented production from these two operations is 90,000 oz Au. Production was also continuous between 1933 and closure in 1942, however no production records for this period have been found yet. (See ASX announcement: 8 February 2019)

A detailed evaluation of the underground workings at Raymond and Carter properties was done by Atlas Precious Metals (Atlas) from 1983-1985. A summary of the Atlas work concluded that almost 4,000 metres of linear drifting was done and approximately 2,000 metres was mined. Using this metric, approximately 50% of the vein was productive. The evidence is based on extensive mapping and sampling by Atlas. The sampling was professionally conducted and assayed by Chemex labs (a division of ALS) but the results are non-JORC compliant

The Company is currently planning a summer work campaign and will notify the market once they are finalised.

Udu - Fiji 100% owned

The Udu project contains a JORC compliant inferred resource estimate of 4.53 million tonnes averaging 3.9% Zn, 1.2% Cu, 0.14% Pb, 0.26g/t Au, 29g/t Ag and 635ppm As using a 0.5% Zn cutoff.

Board and management have determined to spend the minimum amount required to retain ownership of the project and actively pursue a joint venture or farm in partner.

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

4 | ASXRelease 30 April 2020

ASX Release 30 April 2020

For more information, please contact:

John Smith

CFO / Company Secretary +61 2 9375 2353

www.datelineresources.com.au

About Dateline Resources Limited

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) is an Australian publicly listed company focused on gold mining and exploration in Colorado, United States of America. The Company owns 100% of the Gold Links projectwhich is located in Gunnison County

The Gold Links is comprised of several contiguous historic gold mines that have been consolidated by the company. Gold Links has produced up to 150,000 oz of highgrade gold (see ASXannouncement of 8 February2019)

Mineralisation can be traced on surface and underground for almost 6km from the Northern to the Southern sections of the project. Well documented records indicate that there are large areas that remain untested at surface and little to no exploration has been done below the valleyfloor.

Dateline also owns the Green Mountain project that hosts the Lucky Strike and Mineral Hill permitted gold properties and has recommissioned a gold processing plant located at the Lucky Strike Mine. The Gold Links and the Lucky Strike are located approximately 50km apart.

Competent Person’s Statement

Exploration information in this announcement is based upon work reviewed reviewed by Mr Gregory Hall who is a Chartered Professional of Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CP-IMM) and undertaken by Mr Allen David V. Heyl who is a Certified Professional Geologist of the American Institute of Professional Geologists (AIPG) and by Dahrouge Geological consultants. Mr Gregory Hall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a ‘Competent Person’ as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (JORC Code). Mr Gregory Hall is a non-executive Director of Dateline Resources Ltd and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statement s

This Announcement is provided on the basis that neither the Company nor its representatives make any warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability, relevance or completeness of the material contained in the Announcement and nothing contained in the Announcement is, or may be relied upon as a promise, representationor warranty,whetheras to the past or the future. The Companyhereby excludes all warrantiesthat can be excluded by law. The Announcementcontains material which is predictive in nature and may be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known and unknown risks and uncertainties and may differ materially from results ultimatelyachieved.

The Announcement contains “forward-looking statements”. All statements other than those of historical facts included in the Announcement are forward-looking statements including estimates of Mineral Resources. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to, copper, gold and othermetals price volatility,currencyfluctuations,increased productioncosts and variancesin ore grade recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans, as well as political and operational risks and governmental regulation and judicial outcomes. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to any “forward-looking statement” to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the Announcement, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicablesecurities laws. All persons shouldconsiderseeking appropriateprofessionaladvicein reviewing the Announcementand all otherinformation with respect to the Companyand evaluatingthe business, financialperformanceand operationsof the Company.

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

5 | ASXRelease 30 April 2020

==> picture [569 x 323] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Release 30 April 2020
Sacramento
Adit
Raymond
Reynolds Adit
Carter
Adit
Adit
Gold Links North Gold Links Centre Gold Links South
This image is intended as a guide only and is not a surveyed map of our true boundaries
----- End of picture text -----

Gold Links Northincludes	Gold Links Centre includes	Gold Links Southincludes
Sacramento Adit	RaymondAdit	Carter Adit
Sacramento vein	600vein	100vein
	950vein	300vein
Reynolds Adit	1100vein	800vein
1200vein	1200vein	1320vein
1740vein	1700vein	1440vein
2100vein	1800vein	1480vein
2150vein	1825vein	1550vein
2200vein	2457vein	1925vein
2600vein	3300vein	2385vein
2800vein	Jessie vein	2500vein
3300vein	Gold Monument vein	2835vein
	Maggie Mitchell vein	3040vein
Dateline discovered	Volunteer vein	3131vein
Hill vein	Upper Raymondvein	3640vein
West vein		3750vein
Veins starting with digits represent the number of feet from the start of the portal and were discovered and mapped from insidethe adit		4085vein
		4778vein
		4868vein
Veins that don't start with digits were discovered from surface outcrops		4883vein
		6300vein
		Farleyvein
Only the 2150vein has been drilled below the valley floor		Grand Prize vein
		Volunteer vein
		Chloride vein

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

6 | ASXRelease 30 April 2020

ASX Release 30 April 2020

2019 Drill-hole Collar Co-ordinates

Hole ID	Easting (m)	Northing (m)	Elev. (m)	TD (ft)	TD (m)
GM20-001	338052	4255299	2787	368	118.7
GM20-002	337999	4255306	2783	183	59
GM20-003	337922	4255324	2776	430	138.7
GM20-004	337895	4255330	2793	200	64.5
GM20-005	337861	4255350	2797	265	85.5
GM20-006	337823	4255372	2788	200	64.5
GM20-007	337793	4255393	2782	230	74.2
GM20-008	337795	4255389	2783	148	47.7
GM20-009	338185	4255255	2806	230	74.2
GM20-010	338188	4255295	2810	225	72.6
GM20-011	338100	4255276	2803	311	100.3
GM20-012	338025	4255432	2779	145.8	47
GM20-X	338054	4255379	2765	85	27.4

Dateline Resources Drill Hole Collar Coordinates Colorado State Plane Central Zone

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

7 | ASXRelease 30 April 2020

ASX Release 30 April 2020

Drill-hole table

Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)	Green Mountain Drilling (>0.1 Au gm/T)
SampleID	Hole_ID	Type	From (ft)	To (ft)	**Length (ft) **	From (m)	To (m)	**Length (m) **	Au_ppm
GM001-013	GM20-001	RC	45	50	5	13.7	15.2	1.5	0.139
GM001-015	GM20-001	RC	55	60	5	16.8	18.3	1.5	1.170
GM001-016	GM20-001	RC	60	65	5	18.3	19.8	1.5	0.487
GM001-017	GM20-001	RC	65	70	5	19.8	21.3	1.5	0.376
GM001-018	GM20-001	RC	70	75	5	21.3	22.9	1.5	2.220
GM001-021	GM20-001	RC	75	80	5	22.9	24.4	1.5	0.512
GM001-023	GM20-001	RC	85	90	5	25.9	27.4	1.5	0.306
GM001-024	GM20-001	RC	90	95	5	27.4	29.0	1.5	0.172
GM001-025	GM20-001	RC	95	100	5	29.0	30.5	1.5	0.107
GM001-028	GM20-001	RC	110	115	5	33.5	35.1	1.5	1.035
GM001-031	GM20-001	RC	115	120	5	35.1	36.6	1.5	0.124
GM001-036	GM20-001	RC	140	145	5	42.7	44.2	1.5	1.760
GM001-037	GM20-001	RC	145	150	5	44.2	45.7	1.5	1.510
GM001-041	GM20-001	RC	160	165	5	48.8	50.3	1.5	1.135
GM001-048	GM20-001	RC	180	185	5	54.9	56.4	1.5	0.143
GM001-049	GM20-001	RC	185	190	5	56.4	57.9	1.5	1.045
GM001-050	GM20-001	RC	190	195	5	57.9	59.5	1.5	0.215
GM001-090	GM20-001	RC	330	335	5	100.6	102.1	1.5	0.516
GM002-014	GM20-002	RC	50	55	5	15.2	16.8	1.5	0.477
GM002-027	GM20-002	RC	105	110	5	32.0	33.5	1.5	0.182
GM002-045	GM20-002	RC	175	180	5	53.4	54.9	1.5	0.162
GM003-047	GM20-003	RC	180	185	5	54.9	56.4	1.5	1.080
GM003-049	GM20-003	RC	185	190	5	56.4	57.9	1.5	8.230
GM003-050	GM20-003	RC	190	195	5	57.9	59.5	1.5	0.702
GM003-064	GM20-003	RC	250	255	5	76.2	77.7	1.5	1.965
GM003-065	GM20-003	RC	255	260	5	77.7	79.3	1.5	0.156
GM004-034	GM20-004	RC	130	135	5	39.6	41.2	1.5	0.843
GM004-035	GM20-004	RC	135	140	5	41.2	42.7	1.5	0.515
GM004-036	GM20-004	RC	140	145	5	42.7	44.2	1.5	0.102
GM005-044	GM20-005	RC	170	175	5	51.8	53.4	1.5	0.434
GM005-045	GM20-005	RC	175	180	5	53.4	54.9	1.5	0.122
GM005-049	GM20-005	RC	190	195	5	57.9	59.5	1.5	0.807
GM011-007	GM20-011	RC	25	30	5	7.6	9.1	1.5	0.13
GM011-062	GM20-011	RC	240	245	5	73.2	74.7	1.5	1.965
GM011-063	GM20-011	RC	245	250	5	74.7	76.2	1.5	1.000
GM011-064	GM20-011	RC	250	255	5	76.2	77.7	1.5	0.724
GM011-065	GM20-011	RC	255	260	5	77.7	79.3	1.5	0.423
GM011-066	GM20-011	RC	260	265	5	79.3	80.8	1.5	0.208
GM011-068	GM20-011	RC	265	270	5	80.8	82.3	1.5	0.202
GM011-071	GM20-011	RC	280	285	5	85.4	86.9	1.5	0.507
GM011-072	GM20-011	RC	285	290	5	86.9	88.4	1.5	0.197
GM011-073	GM20-011	RC	290	295	5	88.4	89.9	1.5	0.391
GM011-075	GM20-011	RC	295	300	5	89.9	91.5	1.5	0.225
GM011-076	GM20-011	RC	300	305	5	91.5	93.0	1.5	0.374
GM012-028	GM20-012	RC	110	115	5	33.5	35.1	1.5	0.419
GM012-031	GM20-012	RC	115	120	5	35.1	36.6	1.5	0.341
GM012-032	GM20-012	RC	120	125	5	36.6	38.1	1.5	0.407
GM012-033	GM20-012	RC	125	130	5	38.1	39.6	1.5	0.144
GM00X-021	GM20-00X	RC	75	80	5	22.9	24.4	1.5	0.115

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

8 | ASXRelease 30 April 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 31 March 2020

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg	•To date, on the Green Mountain Project
techniques	cut channels, random chips, or	CRG Mining, LLC has completed 970
	specific specialised industry	metres of drilling in 13 drill holes. All the
	standard measurement tools	drilling was done with reverse circulation
	appropriate to the minerals under	(RC). Industry standard RC handling and
	investigation, such as down hole	sampling procedures were employed to
	gamma sondes, or handheld XRF	ensure high quality samples.
	instruments, etc). These examples	•The RC sampling was nominally at 1.5 m
	should not be taken as limiting the	intervals.
	broad meaning of sampling.	•RC drilling samples had an average of 7
	• Include reference to measures	kg split.
	taken to ensure sample	•The entirety of each drill hole was
	representivity and the appropriate	sampled. Potentially mineralized intervals
	calibration of any measurement	were identified by geological logging and
	tools or systems used.	dispatched for assay.
	• Aspects of the determination of	•Samples from drill holes samples were
	mineralisation that are Material to	sent to ALSGlobal, Reno, Nevada for
	the Public Report.	sample preparation and assay. Samples
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’	were dried, weighed, crushed and split to
	work has been done this would be	obtain 250 gm. Samples were placed in
	relatively simple (eg ‘reverse	ring and puck grinder to produce 85%
	circulation drilling was used to	minus 75 micron pulp. This material was
	obtain 1 m samples from which 3	blended on clean cloth and packaged in
	kg was pulverised to produce a 30	paper pulp bags. Using a pulp balance, a
	g charge for fire assay’). In other	30 gm sample was weighted out for
	cases more explanation may be	traditional fire assay. Samples were
	required, such as where there is	analyzed using standard fire assay for
	coarse gold that has inherent	gold.
	sampling problems. Unusual	•All samples followed a strict Chain of
	commodities or mineralisation	Custody.
	types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	•Routine QAQC samples were inserted in the sample runs at a rate of 20%, comprising Certified Reference Materials
		from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd.,
		and duplicates generated in field and at
		the lab including for testing by an outside
		lab (Hazen Research Laboratories,
		Golden, Colorado).
		•Sampling practice is appropriate to the
		geology and mineralization of the deposit
		and complies with industry best practice.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse	•The drilling program utilized RC drilling.
techniques	circulation, open-hole hammer,	•The RC drilling was conducted with a track
	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,	mounted Scout drill rig utilizing high
	sonic, etc) and details (eg core	pressure and high volume compressed
	diameter, triple or standard tube,	air and 101mm diameter face sampling
	depth of diamond tails, face-	percussion hammer. The drilling was
	sampling bit or other type, whether	completed by an experience RC driller.
	core is oriented and if so, by what
	method, etc).

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

1 | 31 January 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 31 March 2020

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill	• Method of recording and assessing	•There has been no assessment
sample	core and chip sample recoveries and	beyond visual of RC sample
recovery	results assessed.	recovery. Recoveries were variable.
	• Measures taken to	•To maximize sample recoveries
	maximise sample recovery	coordinations were done with the
	and ensure representative	driller and the collected sample
	nature of the samples.	splitting ratios would be modified,
	• Whether a relationship exists	ranging from 20% to 33% of the
	between sample recovery and	drilled sample.
	grade and whether sample bias	•There has been no analysis between
	may have occurred due to	sample recoveries and grade.
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
	material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip	•RC samples were geologically logged.
	samples have been	Lithology, veining, alteration, mineralization
	geologically and geotechnically	and weathering are recorded in the
	logged to a level of detail to	appropriate tables of the drill hole database.
	support appropriate Mineral	•Each chip tray was photographed wet. The
	Resource estimation, mining	chips were logged both by quick logging
	studies and metallurgical	on-site and then by optical microscope by
	studies.	the on-site geologist, and sample intervals
	• Whether logging is qualitative or	selected afterwards.
	quantitative in nature. Core (or	•Geological logging of RC samples is
	costean, channel, etc)	qualitative and quantitative in nature.
	photography.
	• The total length and percentage of the
	relevant intersections logged.
Sub-	• If core, whether cut or sawn and	•All drill intervals were sampled and split
sampling	whether quarter, half or all core	during drilling. Samples for analysis were
techniques	taken.	identified by the company geologist while
and sample	• If non-core, whether riffled,	logging the samples. Samples were placed
preparation	tube sampled, rotary split, etc	in a heavy duty cloth sample bag. Each
	and whether sampled wet or	sample bag was marked with permanent
	dry.	marker with sample number, a sample tag
	• For all sample types, the	stapled to the bag, and a sample tag with
	nature, quality and	the corresponding sample number placed in
	appropriateness of the	the bag. Sample bags were sealed with
	sample preparation	draw strings. Samples were sent by freight
	technique.	to ALSGlobal, Reno, Nevada.
	• Quality control procedures	•RC samples were sub sampled using an
	adopted for all sub-sampling	adjustable Gilson splitter to produce a split
	stages to maximise	sample of approximately 7 kg in weight.
	representivity of samples.	•The splitter and pans were routinely cleaned
	• Measures taken to ensure that the	at the end of each sampling interval (1.5 m)
	sampling is representative of the in	to minimize contamination or as needed.
	situ material collected, including for	•Duplicate drilling field samples were
	instance results for field	collected.
	duplicate/second-half sampling.	•Routine QAQC samples were inserted at a
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate	20% rate into the sample batches and
	to the grain size of the material being	comprised Certified Reference Materials
	sampled.	(CRMs) from CDN Resource Laboratories
		Ltd. And field and lab generated duplicates.
		•Rock samples sent to ALS Laboratories
		were dried, weighed, crushed and split,
		with a split pulverized to better than 85%
		passing 75 microns. Samples were
		analyzed for trace elements using 4-acid
		digestion. Additionally, rocks samples

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

2 | 31 January 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 31 March 2020

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		were analyzed by standard 30gm fire
		assay for gold and silver.
		•Sample size assessment was not
		conducted but used sampling size which is
		typical for gold deposits.
		•An accident in the lab prep stage occurred
		for the third and final sample shipment of
		selected drill intercepts for seven drill holes
		resulting an average of 24% of the samples
		lost, primarily from three drill holes but the
		losses are not considered crucial for the
		evaluation of the project.
Quality of	• The nature, quality and	•Samples were assayed by industry
assay	appropriateness of the assaying and	standard methods by ALSGlobal
data and	laboratory procedures used and	Laboratories in Reno, Nevada and Hazen
laboratory	whether the technique is considered	Research Laboratories in Golden,
tests	partial or total.	Colorado.
	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	•Fire assays for gold and silver were
	handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	completed using industry standard
	parameters used in determining the	fire assay methodology.
	analysis including instrument make	•External certified standards and blank
	and model, reading times,	material were added to the sample
	calibrations factors applied and their	submission.
	derivation, etc.
	• Nature of quality control procedures
	adopted (eg standards, blanks,
	duplicates, external laboratory
	checks) and whether acceptable
	levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
	and precision have been established.
Verification	• The verification of significant	•Sampling, documentation and sample
of sampling	intersections by either	submittal were under the guidance and care
and assaying	independent or alternative	of Allen David V. Heyl, certified Professional
	company personnel.	Geologist, CPG #11277 (American Institute
	• The use of twinned holes.	of Professional Geologists.
	• Documentation of primary	•Drilling, sample, and assay data is
	data, data entry	currently stored in MaxGeo Datashed 5,
	procedures, data	a secured cloud hosted data
	verification, data storage	management system.
	(physical and electronic)
	protocols.
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used	•All drill hole collars are to be surveyed using
of data	to locate drill holes (collar and down-	differential GPS survey equipment. The
points	hole surveys), trenches, mine	positions are accurate to within 10 cm x-y and
	workings and other locations used in	height (z) to +/- 20 cm.
	Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used.	•The holes are surveyed in the Colorado State Plane, UTM zone 12, NAD 1983
	• Quality and adequacy of	coordinate system.
	topographic control.	•Down hole surveys will be done using a
		Reflex EZ_TRAC on all diamond drill
		holes.
		•Sample locations were surveyed using
		WGS 1948 UTM Zone 13N.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

3 | 31 January 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 31 March 2020

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Data spacing	• Data spacing for reporting of	•The spacing and location of data is
and	Exploration Results.	currently only being considered for
distribution	• Whether the data spacing and	exploration purposes.
	distribution is sufficient to establish	•No sample compositing has been applied.
	the degree of geological and grade
	continuity appropriate for the Mineral
	Resource and Ore Reserve
	estimation procedure(s) and
	classifications applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has
	been applied.
Orientation of	• Whether the orientation of sampling	•Drill holes are planned to be drilled obliquely
data in	achieves unbiased sampling of	to near perpendicular to the known
relation to	possible structures and the extent to	mineralized structures. Definition of structure
geological	which this is known, considering the	location is the principal goal.
structure	deposit type.	•Sample orientation is deemed to be
	• If the relationship between the	representative for reporting purposes.
	drilling orientation and the	•No bias is considered to have been
	orientation of key mineralised	introduced by the existing sampling
	structures is considered to have	orientation.
	introduced a sampling bias, this
	should be assessed and reported if
	material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	•All samples were taken and maintained
security	security.	under the constant care of CRG Mining
		personnel. Samples were delivered to
		ALSGlobal by a licensed transportation
		company.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	•Drill hole sampling techniques and QAQC
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	procedures have been developed and
		reviewed by Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P.
		Geo. of Acuity Geoscience Ltd.,
		Dahrouge Geological Consulting, Ltd.,
		and Allen David V. Heyl, CPG.
		•The QAQC program has demonstrated
		its ability to catch errors.
		•A QAQC review will be completed for this
		program.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number,	•All tenements are 100% owned by
tenement and	location and ownership including	Dateline Resources Limited or a
land tenure	agreements or material issues with	wholly owned subsidiary and there
status	third parties such as joint ventures,	exist production-based royalties as
	partnerships, overriding royalties,	previously disclosed to ASX.
	native title interests, historical sites,
	wilderness or national park and
	environmental settings.
	• The security of the tenure held at the
	time of reporting along with any
	known impediments to obtaining a
	licence to operate in the area.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

4 | 31 January 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 31 March 2020

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	•Historical work was completed by various
done by other	exploration by other parties.	groups over 100 years. Review of this work
parties		was completed by Dahrouge Geological
		Consulting Ltd. In 2019.
		•All previous work undertaken by others is
		non-JORC compliant.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and	•The Green Mountain Project is hosted by
	style of mineralisation.	an Early Proterozoic assemblage of fine-
		grained meta-sediments and interbedded
		felsitic meta-volcanics. These were
		intruded by Early Proterozoic amphibolites,
		granites, and rhyolite porphyry dykes.
		Tertiary age rhyolitic stocks, dikes and sills
		intrude the Proterozoic rocks.
		•The gold and silver mineralization occurs
		in narrow fissure quartz veins. Veins in the
		district trend West-Northwest with steep
		Southerly dips.
		•The auriferous quartz veins cut
		through the various rock types. There
		appears to be an affinity for the veins
		with the amphibolites. The primary
		sulphide occurring in these veins is
		pyrite. Broad zones of silicification
		and disseminated sulfides have been
		found near the veins.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material	•See Table 1 within this report for
Information	to the understanding of the	details of the drill holes and sample
	exploration results including a	intervals.
	tabulation of the following information	•The drilling found disseminated
	for all Material drill holes:	weakly (<0.1 gm Au/T) to strongly (>
	o easting and northing of the drill hole	2 gm Au/T) auriferous zones of
	collar	pyrite, quartz veinlets and
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level	silicification in the wallrocks
	– elevation above sea level in	approaching the quartz veins.
	metres) of the drill hole collar	•These mineralized zones at times
	o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length.	had significant intercepted widths (not true widths) of over 20 meters. •Post-mineral faulting has caused small to moderate scale offsets of the
	• If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this	Precambrian-aged Lucky Strike vein system. •The drill hole GM20-001 had its
	exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	entirety assayed for Au and multielement (ME) analyses. The ME showed a positive relationship between Au and the trace elements
		Ag, Sb, Bi, Pb, Zn, Cd, Cr, In, Mo,
		Rb, Li, Sr and W.
		•Vein intercept widths ranged from 20
		cm to 3 m and with the veins Au
		values ranging from < 0.1 gm Au/T to
		>8 gm Au/T.
		•The Lucky Strike vein was
		intercepted in five drill holes and the
		related vein system was found in
		another three drill holes out of a total
		of 13 drill holes completed.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

5 | 31 January 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 31 March 2020

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results,	•Drill hole intersections are reported
aggregation	weighting averaging techniques,	above a lower exploration cut-off
methods	maximum and/or minimum grade	grade of 0.1 g/T Au and no upper cut
	truncations (eg cutting of high grades)	off grade has been applied.
	and cut-off grades are usually Material	•A minimum intercept of 1.5 m applies
	and should be stated.	to the RC sampling in the tabulated
	• Where aggregate intercepts	results presented in the main body of
	incorporate short lengths of high	this release.
	grade results and longer lengths of
	low grade results, the procedure used
	for such aggregation should be stated
	and some typical examples of such
	aggregations should be shown in
	detail.
	• The assumptions used for any
	reporting of metal equivalent values
	should be clearly stated.
Relationship	• These relationships are	•Drill holes are orientated
between	particularly important in the	obliquely to the mineralized
mineralisation	reporting of Exploration Results.	structures and disseminated
widths and	• If the geometry of the	bodies.
intercept	mineralisation with respect to the	•Interception angles of the
lengths	drill hole angle is known, its	mineralized structures are
	nature should be reported.	estimated by geometries
	• If it is not known and only the down	from known occurrences in
	hole lengths are reported, there should	the adjacent mine workings
	be a clear statement to this effect (eg	and the RC drilled
	‘down hole length, true width not	intercepts.
	known’).
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections	•Supporting figures have been included
	(with scales) and tabulations of	within the body of this release.
	intercepts should be included for
	any significant discovery being
	reported. These should include, but
	not be limited to a plan view of drill
	hole collar locations and appropriate
	sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of	•Representative reporting of both low and
reporting	all Exploration Results is not	high grades and/or widths have been
	practicable, representative reporting	reported.
	of both low and high grades and/or
	widths should be practiced to avoid
	misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful
substantive	and material, should be reported
exploration	including (but not limited to): geological
data	observations; geophysical survey
	results; geochemical survey results;
	bulk samples – size and method of
	treatment; metallurgical test results;
	bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
	and rock characteristics; potential
	deleterious or contaminating
	substances.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

6 | 31 January 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 31 March 2020

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned	•Further work is being planned and a
	further work (eg tests for lateral	market update will be provided once the
	extensions or depth extensions or	work program has been agreed
	large-scale step-out drilling).
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas
	of possible extensions, including the
	main geological interpretations and
	future drilling areas, provided this
	information is not commercially
	sensitive.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

7 | 31 January 2020