DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED

ASX Release

28 October 2020

(ACN149105653) ASX Code:DTR

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

September 2020 Quarterly Report

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX:DTR) (“Dateline” or the “Company”), is pleased to provide this Activities Report on the Company’s Gold Links project, Colorado, for the three-month period ending 30 September 2020.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Gold Links– Colorado USA 100% owned

Share Price (27/10/20) $0.002 Shares on issue 8,210million Market Cap $16.4million UnlistedOptions 10million

The company completed a surface mapping program over the whole of the Gold Links project. The objective of the program was to verify the previously mapped areas by Atlas Precious Metals in the 1980’s over the Gold Links Centre and South and to map the Gold Links North.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

Southern Cross Exploration NL 31.8% Mr. Mark JohnsonAO 19.4% National Nominees Ltd 15.2%

DIRECTORS & MANAGEMENT

Mark JohnsonAO Chairman

Stephen Baghdadi ManagingDirector

Greg Hall Non-ExecutiveDirector

Tony Ferguson Non-Executive Director

John Smith CompanySecretary

CONTACT

John Smith Phone: +61 2 93752353 Postal Address: P.O.Box 553 South Hurstville NSW2221 Email: [email protected]

Mapping was able to verify all the work that had been carried out by Atlas Precious Metals. The areas previously disturbed and trenched were mapped and several samples were taken across the whole project. At Gold Links North, the location of the ‘Toronto’ and the ‘Wall Street’ shafts have been mapped and are located on the south side of the ‘2150’ vein and the ‘West’ vein respectively. The West vein was discovered by Dateline during the 2019 surface drilling campaign.

Samples were collected across the whole property and due to there being between 3-10 metres of top cover, most of the samples obtained were from the surrounding mine dumps, floats and where possible from exposed shafts. Several of the samples assayed have returned significant gold and silver values including the following.

87.3g/t Au, sample CRS000065 from waste dump at the 10,000ft portal
28.2g/t Au, sample CRS000070 from Wall Street shaft
15.55g/t Au, sample CRS000074 from Wall Street vein dump
18.45g/t Au, sample CRS000042 from Raymond vein dump
11.85g/t Au, sample CRS000061 from Toronto vein dump
13.6g/t Au, sample CRS000039 from the Raymond trench

ASX Release 28 October 2020

The mapping has identified several drill targets that will be followed up either by drilling from underground or from the surface. The priority targets are the Wall Street-West vein and the South side of the 2150 vein towards the Toronto shaft

==> picture [509 x 579] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Plan view of Gold Links project

The sampling program was successful in proving that high grade mineralisation has been across all the known key working sites. A detailed list of key assay results is attached to the JORC report

2 | ASXRelease 28 October 2020

ASX Release 28 October 2020

Impacts of Covid-19

During the September quarter, the company limited its field activities to surface mapping and general maintenance and compliance related tasks. This was done in direct response to the prevailing Covid-19 situation in the USA.

Udu

The company has applied for a three-year extension to its exploration tenements in Fiji. A decision is expected during the December quarter

For more information, please contact:

John Smith

CFO / Company Secretary +61 2 9375 2353 www.datelineresources.com.au

About Dateline Resources Limited

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) is an Australian publicly listed company focused on gold mining and exploration in Colorado, United States of America. The Company owns 100% of the Gold Links project which is located in Gunnison County

The Gold Links is comprised of several contiguous historic gold mines that have been consolidated by the company. Gold Links has produced up to 150,000 oz of highgrade gold (see ASX announcement of 8 February 2019)

Mineralisation can be traced on surface and underground for almost 6km from the Northern to the Southern sections of the project. Well documented records indicate that there are large areas that remain untested at surface and little to no exploration has been done below the valleyfloor.

Dateline also owns the Green Mountain project that hosts the Lucky Strike and Mineral Hill permitted gold properties and has recommissioned a gold processing plant located at the Lucky Strike Mine. The Gold Links and the Lucky Strike are located approximately 50km apart.

Competent Person’s Statement

Exploration information in this announcement is based upon work reviewed by Mr Gregory Hall who is a Chartered Professional of Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CP-IMM) and undertaken by Mr Allen David V. Heyl who is a Certified Professional Geologist of the American Institute of Professional Geologists (AIPG). Mr Gregory Hall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a ‘Competent Person’ as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (JORC Code). Mr Gregory Hall is a non-executive Director of Dateline Resources Ltd and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

This Announcement is provided on the basis that neither the Company nor its representatives make any warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability, relevance or completeness of the material contained in the Announcement and nothing contained in the Announcement is, or may be relied upon as a promise, representation or warranty, whether as to the past or the future. The Company hereby excludes all warranties that can be excluded by law. The Announcement contains material which is predictive in nature and may be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known and unknown risks and uncertainties and may differ materially from results ultimately achieved.

The Announcement contains “forward-looking statements”. All statements other than those of historical facts included in the Announcement are forward-looking statements including estimates of Mineral Resources. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to, copper, gold and other metals price volatility, currency fluctuations, increased production costs and variances in ore grade recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans, as well as political and operational risks and governmental regulation and judicial outcomes. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to any “forward-looking statement” to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the Announcement, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. All persons should consider seeking appropriate professional advice in reviewing the Announcement and all other information with respect to the Company and evaluating the business, financial performance and operations of the Company.

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

3 | ASXRelease 28 October 2020

ASX Release 28 October 2020

Key Sample and Assay Data	Key Sample and Assay Data	Key Sample and Assay Data	Key Sample and Assay Data	Key Sample and Assay Data	Key Sample and Assay Data
Sample ID	Area	Easting	Northing	Type	Assay Au ppm
CRS000003	PorphyryHill	361479	4274243	Select Prospect	3.41
CRS000005	PorphyryHill	361864	4273953	Select Dump	3.25
CRS000007	PorphyryHill	361402	4274713	CompOC	8.25
CRS000009	PorphyryHill	361560	4274661	Select Dump	18.8
CRS000023	Upper Whig	363075	4275218	Select Dump	4.34
CRS000025	Upper Whig	363289	4275142	Select Dump	6.43
CRS000026	Upper Whig	363349	4275206	Select Dump	1.95
CRS000033	Raymond	362627	4275512	Select Dump	2.54
CRS000034	Raymond	362497	4275293	Select Dump	15.1
CRS000036	Raymond	362629	4275253	Select Dump	3.4
CRS000037	Raymond	363176	4275734	Select Dump	20.2
CRS000038	Raymond	362852	4275800	Select Grab	3.88
CRS000039	Raymond	362833	4275767	Select Grab	13.6
CRS000040	Raymond	362813	4275718	Select Grab	11.25
CRS000042	Raymond	362575	4275792	Select Dump	18.45
CRS000043	Raymond	362557	4275823	Select Dump	2.68
CRS000044	Raymond	362575	4275739	Select Dump	4.21
CRS000058	Gold Links Ridge	363021	4276668	Select Dump	13
CRS000061	Toronto/2150 Vein	363090	4276446	Select Dump	11.85
CRS000063	Sacramento	363711	4277020	Select Dump	1.48
CRS000064	Sacramento	363686	4277698	Select Dump	12.8
CRS000065	9900 SL	363350	4277002	Select Dump	87.3
CRS000066	9900 SL	363350	4277002	Select Dump	2.87
CRS000067	Dutch Flats	363985	4276378	Select Dump	6.27
CRS000069	Wall Street	362614	4275897	Select Dump	14.1
CRS000070	Wall Street	362602	4275916	CompOre	28.2
CRS000071	Wall Street	362602	4275916	Select Ore Grab	1.36
CRS000073	Wall Street	362641	4276093	Select Dump	6.15
CRS000074	Wall Street	362840	4276299	Select Dump	15.55
CRS000076	Dutch Flats	363630	4276077	Select Dump	1.245

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

4 | ASXRelease 28 October 2020

==> picture [569 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Release 28 October 2020
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [561 x 273] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Sacramento
Adit
Raymond
Reynolds Adit
Carter
Adit
Adit
Gold Links North Gold Links Centre Gold Links South
This image is intended as a guide only and is not a surveyed map of our true boundaries
----- End of picture text -----

Gold Links Northincludes	Gold Links Centre includes	Gold Links Southincludes
Sacramento Adit	Raymond Adit	Carter Adit
Sacramento vein	600vein	100vein
	950vein	300vein
Reynolds Adit	1100 vein	800vein
1200 vein	1200 vein	1320 vein
1740 vein	1700 vein	1440 vein
2100 vein	1800 vein	1480 vein
2150 vein	1825 vein	1550 vein
2200 vein	2457 vein	1925 vein
2600 vein	3300 vein	2385 vein
2800 vein	Jessie vein	2500 vein
3300 vein	Gold Monument vein	2835 vein
	Maggie Mitchell vein	3040 vein
Dateline discovered	Volunteer vein	3131 vein
Hill vein	Upper Raymondvein	3640 vein
West vein		3750 vein
Veins starting with digits represent the number of feet from the start of the portal and were discovered and mapped from insidethe adit		4085 vein
		4778 vein
		4868 vein
Veins that don't start with digits were discovered from surface outcrops		4883 vein
		6300 vein
		Farleyvein
Only the 2150 vein has been drilled below the valley floor		Grand Prize vein
		Volunteer vein
		Chloride vein

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

5 | ASXRelease 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg	•To date, on the Gold Brick Project, CRG
techniques	cut channels, random chips, or	Mining, LLC has collected 78 rock chip
	specific specialised industry	samples on surface during its summer
	standard measurement tools	reconnaissance/target confirmation
	appropriate to the minerals under	program. Industry standard sampling
	investigation, such as down hole	procedures were employed.
	gamma sondes, or handheld XRF	•The rock chip sampling was of vein
	instruments, etc). These examples	mineralization from old prospects,
	should not be taken as limiting the	trenches, mine dumps and occasionally
	broad meaning of sampling.	mineralization found on sparse outcrop.
	• Include reference to measures	•The samples had an average of 3.0 kg
	taken to ensure sample	weight.
	representivity and the appropriate	•Each sample was located by GPS in the
	calibration of any measurement	heavily wooded, steep project. Non –
	tools or systems used.	sample datapoints (253) for geology and
	• Aspects of the determination of	local reference were also collected, a
	mineralisation that are Material to	combined total of 331 datapoints.
	the Public Report.	•Samples were sent to ALS Global, Reno,
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’	Nevada for sample preparation and
	work has been done this would be	assay. Samples were dried, weighed,
	relatively simple (eg ‘reverse	crushed and split to obtain 250 gm.
	circulation drilling was used to	Samples were placed in ring and puck
	obtain 1 m samples from which 3	grinder to produce 85% minus 75 micron
	kg was pulverised to produce a 30	pulp. This material was blended on clean
	g charge for fire assay’). In other	cloth and packaged in paper pulp bags.
	cases more explanation may be	Using a pulp balance, a 30 gm sample
	required, such as where there is	was weighted out for traditional fire
	coarse gold that has inherent	assay. Samples were analyzed using
	sampling problems. Unusual	standard fire assay for gold and multi-
	commodities or mineralisation	elements.
	types (eg submarine nodules) may	•All samples followed a strict Chain of
	warrant disclosure of detailed	Custody.
	information.	•Routine QAQC samples were inserted in
		the sample runs at a rate of 5%,
		comprising Certified Reference Materials
		from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd.,
		and no duplicates were generated in the
		field.
		•Sampling practice is appropriate to the
		geology and mineralization of the deposit
		and complies with industry best practice.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse	•No drilling was conducted.
techniques	circulation, open-hole hammer,
	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
	sonic, etc) and details (eg core
	diameter, triple or standard tube,
	depth of diamond tails, face-
	sampling bit or other type, whether
	core is oriented and if so, by what
	method, etc).

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

1 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill	• Method of recording and assessing
sample	core and chip sample recoveries and
recovery	results assessed.
	• Measures taken to
	maximise sample recovery
	and ensure representative
	nature of the samples.
	• Whether a relationship exists
	between sample recovery and
	grade and whether sample bias
	may have occurred due to
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
	material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip
	samples have been
	geologically and geotechnically
	logged to a level of detail to
	support appropriate Mineral
	Resource estimation, mining
	studies and metallurgical
	studies.
	• Whether logging is qualitative or
	quantitative in nature. Core (or
	costean, channel, etc)
	photography.
	• The total length and percentage of the
	relevant intersections logged.
Sub-	• If core, whether cut or sawn and
sampling	whether quarter, half or all core
techniques	taken.
and sample	• If non-core, whether riffled,
preparation	tube sampled, rotary split, etc
	and whether sampled wet or
	dry.
	• For all sample types, the
	nature, quality and
	appropriateness of the
	sample preparation
	technique.
	• Quality control procedures
	adopted for all sub-sampling
	stages to maximise
	representivity of samples.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the
	sampling is representative of the in
	situ material collected, including for
	instance results for field
	duplicate/second-half sampling.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate
	to the grain size of the material being
	sampled.
Quality of	• The nature, quality and	•Samples were assayed by industry
assay	appropriateness of the assaying and	standard methods by ALS Global
data and	laboratory procedures used and	Laboratories in Reno, Nevada.
laboratory	whether the technique is considered	•Fire assays for gold and silver were
tests	partial or total.	completed using industry standard
	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	fire assay methodology.
	handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	•External certified standards and blank

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

2 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria		JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		parameters used in determining the	material were added to the sample
		analysis including instrument make	submission.
		and model, reading times,
		calibrations factors applied and their
		derivation, etc.
		• Nature of quality control procedures
		adopted (eg standards, blanks,
		duplicates, external laboratory
		checks) and whether acceptable
		levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
		and precision have been established.
Verification		• The verification of significant	•A verification study was initiated on the
of	sampling	intersections by either	drilling samples for the 9900 resource block
and	assaying	independent or alternative	on the 2150 N vein, and the evaluation of the
		company personnel.	Sacramento vein and sub-9600 level 2150 N
		• The use of twinned holes.	vein mineralization. This study is being led by
		• Documentation of primary	Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P. Geo. of Acuity
		data, data entry	Geoscience Ltd with Patrick J. Hollenbeck,
		procedures, data	CPG, and should be completed in December,
		verification, data storage	2020
		(physical and electronic)	•Sampling, documentation and sample
		protocols.	submittal were under the guidance and care
		• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	of Allen David V. Heyl, certified Professional
			Geologist, CPG #11277 (American Institute
			of Professional Geologists.
			•Drilling, sample, and assay data is
			currently stored in MXDeposit, a
			secured cloud hosted data
			management system.
Location		• Accuracy and quality of surveys used	•All data points surveyed using handheld GPS
of data		to locate drill holes (collar and down-	survey devices. The positions in highly
points		hole surveys), trenches, mine	mountainous terrain are accurate to within 8 m
		workings and other locations used in	(normally 5 m) x-y and height (z) to +/- 20 m.
		Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used.	•The data points are surveyed in the UTM zone 13, NAD83 coordinate system.
		• Quality and adequacy of	•Numerous tie-ins with established survey
		topographic control.	points were done.
			•The data points have been transferred
			onto a LIDAR base map and their
			accuracy has been confirmed.
Data spacing		• Data spacing for reporting of	•The spacing and location of data is
and		Exploration Results.	currently only being considered for
distribution		• Whether the data spacing and	exploration purposes.
		distribution is sufficient to establish	•No sample compositing has been applied.
		the degree of geological and grade
		continuity appropriate for the Mineral
		Resource and Ore Reserve
		estimation procedure(s) and
		classifications applied.
		• Whether sample compositing has
		been applied.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

3 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Orientation of	• Whether the orientation of sampling	•When mineralization was exposed on
data in	achieves unbiased sampling of	outcrop samples were collected as a chip
relation to	possible structures and the extent to	channel across it to near perpendicular to
geological	which this is known, considering the	the known mineralized structures.
structure	deposit type.	•Sample orientation is deemed to be
	• If the relationship between the	representative for reporting purposes.
	drilling orientation and the	•No bias is considered to have been
	orientation of key mineralised	introduced by the existing sampling
	structures is considered to have	orientation.
	introduced a sampling bias, this
	should be assessed and reported if
	material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	•All samples were taken and maintained
security	security.	under the constant care of CRG Mining
		personnel. Samples were delivered to
		ALS Global by a licensed transportation
		company.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	•Currently the resource information from
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	the 2017-2019 exploration drilling
		programs of the 9900 resource block on
		the 2150 N vein, the Sacramento vein
		and sub-9600 level 2150 N vein
		mineralization is being reviewed, studied
		and modeled to allow the identified
		resources to potentially become qualified
		under JORC standards as Measured,
		Indicated, and Inferred. Patrick J.
		Hollenbeck, CPG, is conducting this
		review and study. Part of this study is the
		QAQC – Verification study being
		conducted by Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P.
		Geo. Of Acuity Geoscience Ltd.
		•Drill hole sampling techniques and QAQC
		procedures have been developed and
		reviewed by Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P.
		Geo. of Acuity Geoscience Ltd.,
		Dahrouge Geological Consulting, Ltd.,
		and Allen David V. Heyl, CPG.
		•The QAQC program has demonstrated
		its ability to catch errors.
		•A QAQC review will be completed for this
		program.
		•CRG Mining is creating an Operations Plan
		for the Gold Links Mine (including the 9900
		resource) in preparation for future mine
		development and operations.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number,	•All tenements are 100% owned by
tenement and	location and ownership including	Dateline Resources Limited or a
land tenure	agreements or material issues with	wholly owned subsidiary and there
status	third parties such as joint ventures,	exist production-based royalties as

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

4 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	partnerships, overriding royalties,	previously disclosed to ASX.
	native title interests, historical sites,
	wilderness or national park and
	environmental settings.
	• The security of the tenure held at the
	time of reporting along with any
	known impediments to obtaining a
	licence to operate in the area.
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	•Historical work was completed by various
done by other	exploration by other parties.	groups over 100 years. Review of this work
parties		was completed by Dateline Resources
		Limited
		•All previous work undertaken by others is
		non-JORC compliant.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and	•The Gold Brick Project is hosted by an
	style of mineralisation.	Early Proterozoic assemblage of fine-
		grained meta-sediments and interbedded
		felsitic meta-volcanics. These were
		intruded by Early Proterozoic amphibolites,
		tonalities, granites, and pegmatite dykes.
		Subsequently Tertiary age rhyolitic stocks,
		dikes and sills intrude the Proterozoic
		rocks.
		•The gold and silver mineralization occurs
		in narrow fissure quartz veins. Veins in the
		district trend Northeast with steep Westerly
		dips.
		•The auriferous quartz veins cut
		through the various rock types. They
		have been mined in some cases for
		over 2 kms in strike length and 500 m
		in height. The primary sulphide
		occurring in these veins is pyrite, with
		sphalerite, galena, and chalcopyrite
		as well. Moderately wide zones of
		chloritization, argillization,
		sericitization, and silicification and
		disseminated sulfides have been
		found near the veins.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material
Information	to the understanding of the
	exploration results including a
	tabulation of the following information
	for all Material drill holes:
	`o` easting and northing of the drill hole
	collar
	`o` elevation or RL (Reduced Level
	– elevation above sea level in
	metres) of the drill hole collar
	`o` dip and azimuth of the hole
	`o` down hole length and interception
	depth
	`o` hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the
	information is not Material and this
	exclusion does not detract from
	the understanding of the report, the

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

5 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Competent Person should clearly
	explain why this is the case.
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results,
aggregation	weighting averaging techniques,
methods	maximum and/or minimum grade
	truncations (eg cutting of high grades)
	and cut-off grades are usually Material
	and should be stated.
	• Where aggregate intercepts
	incorporate short lengths of high
	grade results and longer lengths of
	low grade results, the procedure used
	for such aggregation should be stated
	and some typical examples of such
	aggregations should be shown in
	detail.
	• The assumptions used for any
	reporting of metal equivalent values
	should be clearly stated.
Relationship	• These relationships are
between	particularly important in the
mineralisation	reporting of Exploration Results.
widths and	• If the geometry of the
intercept	mineralisation with respect to the
lengths	drill hole angle is known, its
	nature should be reported.
	• If it is not known and only the down
	hole lengths are reported, there should
	be a clear statement to this effect (eg
	‘down hole length, true width not
	known’).
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections	•Supporting figures have been included
	(with scales) and tabulations of	within the body of this release.
	intercepts should be included for
	any significant discovery being
	reported. These should include, but
	not be limited to a plan view of drill
	hole collar locations and appropriate
	sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of	•Representative reporting of both low and
reporting	all Exploration Results is not	high grades have been reported.
	practicable, representative reporting
	of both low and high grades and/or
	widths should be practiced to avoid
	misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful	•	The Gold Brick project has been cut by
substantive	and material, should be reported		numerous, semi-parallel, narrow veins
exploration	including (but not limited to): geological		that are in all the lithologies present and
data	observations; geophysical survey		have demonstrated vertical and
	results; geochemical survey results;		longitudinal continuity. The veins
	bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential	•	mineralization shoots carry precious metal grades that were mined extensively in the past. The Surface Reconnaissance-Target

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

6 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	deleterious or contaminating		Confirmation program was conducted in
	substances.		steep, densely forested terrain with thick
			skree covered slopes and only
			occasional outcrops or subcrops.
		•	The Au assay results from the Surface
			Reconnaissance-Target Confirmation
			program range from 0.004 ppm Au to
			87.3 ppm Au. There were 32 of the 78
			rock samples (4 sample assays pending)
			with Au assays above 1 pm Au. There
			were 14 of the samples with Au assays
			over 8 ppm Au.
			•The Surface program confirmed the
			horizontal strike lengths of the important
			past producing veins including the
			Volunteer-Chloride as over 2 kms, the
			Raymond as over 1 km, and the Wall
			Street-West Vein as over 1.5 kms. The
			latter has numerous high grade assays
			from the program and will have a higher
			exploration prioritization in the future.
		•	Many other veins with past significant
			mining activity were encountered. The
			trenching and drill platforms of Atlas
			Gold in the 1980’s was confirmed.
		•	Recent drilling (2017-2019) has
			confirmed the historic mining and drilling
			data of the Gold Links and Sacramento
			mines.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned	•At	Gold Brick, future work will include
	further work (eg tests for lateral	expanded drilling the on-strike and down-
	extensions or depth extensions or	dip extensions of the 2150, Wall Street -
	large-scale step-out drilling).	West Vein, preparation for underground
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas	exploitation, finalizing the surface program;
	of possible extensions, including the	reopening, mapping and sampling of
	main geological interpretations and	previously inaccessible underground
	future drilling areas, provided this	workings; as well as infill and expanded
	information is not commercially	surface soil geochemistry, geological
	sensitive.	mapping, and geophysics.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

7 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg	•To date, on the Gold Brick Project, CRG
techniques	cut channels, random chips, or	Mining, LLC has collected 78 rock chip
	specific specialised industry	samples on surface during its summer
	standard measurement tools	reconnaissance/target confirmation
	appropriate to the minerals under	program. Industry standard sampling
	investigation, such as down hole	procedures were employed.
	gamma sondes, or handheld XRF	•The rock chip sampling was of vein
	instruments, etc). These examples	mineralization from old prospects,
	should not be taken as limiting the	trenches, mine dumps and occasionally
	broad meaning of sampling.	mineralization found on sparse outcrop.
	• Include reference to measures	•The samples had an average of 3.0 kg
	taken to ensure sample	weight.
	representivity and the appropriate	•Each sample was located by GPS in the
	calibration of any measurement	heavily wooded, steep project. Non –
	tools or systems used.	sample datapoints (253) for geology and
	• Aspects of the determination of	local reference were also collected, a
	mineralisation that are Material to	combined total of 331 datapoints.
	the Public Report.	•Samples were sent to ALS Global, Reno,
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’	Nevada for sample preparation and
	work has been done this would be	assay. Samples were dried, weighed,
	relatively simple (eg ‘reverse	crushed and split to obtain 250 gm.
	circulation drilling was used to	Samples were placed in ring and puck
	obtain 1 m samples from which 3	grinder to produce 85% minus 75 micron
	kg was pulverised to produce a 30	pulp. This material was blended on clean
	g charge for fire assay’). In other	cloth and packaged in paper pulp bags.
	cases more explanation may be	Using a pulp balance, a 30 gm sample
	required, such as where there is	was weighted out for traditional fire
	coarse gold that has inherent	assay. Samples were analyzed using
	sampling problems. Unusual	standard fire assay for gold and multi-
	commodities or mineralisation	elements.
	types (eg submarine nodules) may	•All samples followed a strict Chain of
	warrant disclosure of detailed	Custody.
	information.	•Routine QAQC samples were inserted in
		the sample runs at a rate of 5%,
		comprising Certified Reference Materials
		from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd.,
		and no duplicates were generated in the
		field.
		•Sampling practice is appropriate to the
		geology and mineralization of the deposit
		and complies with industry best practice.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse	•No drilling was conducted.
techniques	circulation, open-hole hammer,
	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
	sonic, etc) and details (eg core
	diameter, triple or standard tube,
	depth of diamond tails, face-
	sampling bit or other type, whether
	core is oriented and if so, by what
	method, etc).

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

1 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill	• Method of recording and assessing
sample	core and chip sample recoveries and
recovery	results assessed.
	• Measures taken to
	maximise sample recovery
	and ensure representative
	nature of the samples.
	• Whether a relationship exists
	between sample recovery and
	grade and whether sample bias
	may have occurred due to
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
	material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip
	samples have been
	geologically and geotechnically
	logged to a level of detail to
	support appropriate Mineral
	Resource estimation, mining
	studies and metallurgical
	studies.
	• Whether logging is qualitative or
	quantitative in nature. Core (or
	costean, channel, etc)
	photography.
	• The total length and percentage of the
	relevant intersections logged.
Sub-	• If core, whether cut or sawn and
sampling	whether quarter, half or all core
techniques	taken.
and sample	• If non-core, whether riffled,
preparation	tube sampled, rotary split, etc
	and whether sampled wet or
	dry.
	• For all sample types, the
	nature, quality and
	appropriateness of the
	sample preparation
	technique.
	• Quality control procedures
	adopted for all sub-sampling
	stages to maximise
	representivity of samples.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the
	sampling is representative of the in
	situ material collected, including for
	instance results for field
	duplicate/second-half sampling.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate
	to the grain size of the material being
	sampled.
Quality of	• The nature, quality and	•Samples were assayed by industry
assay	appropriateness of the assaying and	standard methods by ALS Global
data and	laboratory procedures used and	Laboratories in Reno, Nevada.
laboratory	whether the technique is considered	•Fire assays for gold and silver were
tests	partial or total.	completed using industry standard
	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	fire assay methodology.
	handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	•External certified standards and blank

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

2 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria		JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		parameters used in determining the	material were added to the sample
		analysis including instrument make	submission.
		and model, reading times,
		calibrations factors applied and their
		derivation, etc.
		• Nature of quality control procedures
		adopted (eg standards, blanks,
		duplicates, external laboratory
		checks) and whether acceptable
		levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
		and precision have been established.
Verification		• The verification of significant	•A verification study was initiated on the
of	sampling	intersections by either	drilling samples for the 9900 resource block
and	assaying	independent or alternative	on the 2150 N vein, and the evaluation of the
		company personnel.	Sacramento vein and sub-9600 level 2150 N
		• The use of twinned holes.	vein mineralization. This study is being led by
		• Documentation of primary	Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P. Geo. of Acuity
		data, data entry	Geoscience Ltd with Patrick J. Hollenbeck,
		procedures, data	CPG, and should be completed in December,
		verification, data storage	2020
		(physical and electronic)	•Sampling, documentation and sample
		protocols.	submittal were under the guidance and care
		• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	of Allen David V. Heyl, certified Professional
			Geologist, CPG #11277 (American Institute
			of Professional Geologists.
			•Drilling, sample, and assay data is
			currently stored in MXDeposit, a
			secured cloud hosted data
			management system.
Location		• Accuracy and quality of surveys used	•All data points surveyed using handheld GPS
of data		to locate drill holes (collar and down-	survey devices. The positions in highly
points		hole surveys), trenches, mine	mountainous terrain are accurate to within 8 m
		workings and other locations used in	(normally 5 m) x-y and height (z) to +/- 20 m.
		Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used.	•The data points are surveyed in the UTM zone 13, NAD83 coordinate system.
		• Quality and adequacy of	•Numerous tie-ins with established survey
		topographic control.	points were done.
			•The data points have been transferred
			onto a LIDAR base map and their
			accuracy has been confirmed.
Data spacing		• Data spacing for reporting of	•The spacing and location of data is
and		Exploration Results.	currently only being considered for
distribution		• Whether the data spacing and	exploration purposes.
		distribution is sufficient to establish	•No sample compositing has been applied.
		the degree of geological and grade
		continuity appropriate for the Mineral
		Resource and Ore Reserve
		estimation procedure(s) and
		classifications applied.
		• Whether sample compositing has
		been applied.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

3 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Orientation of	• Whether the orientation of sampling	•When mineralization was exposed on
data in	achieves unbiased sampling of	outcrop samples were collected as a chip
relation to	possible structures and the extent to	channel across it to near perpendicular to
geological	which this is known, considering the	the known mineralized structures.
structure	deposit type.	•Sample orientation is deemed to be
	• If the relationship between the	representative for reporting purposes.
	drilling orientation and the	•No bias is considered to have been
	orientation of key mineralised	introduced by the existing sampling
	structures is considered to have	orientation.
	introduced a sampling bias, this
	should be assessed and reported if
	material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	•All samples were taken and maintained
security	security.	under the constant care of CRG Mining
		personnel. Samples were delivered to
		ALS Global by a licensed transportation
		company.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	•Currently the resource information from
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	the 2017-2019 exploration drilling
		programs of the 9900 resource block on
		the 2150 N vein, the Sacramento vein
		and sub-9600 level 2150 N vein
		mineralization is being reviewed, studied
		and modeled to allow the identified
		resources to potentially become qualified
		under JORC standards as Measured,
		Indicated, and Inferred. Patrick J.
		Hollenbeck, CPG, is conducting this
		review and study. Part of this study is the
		QAQC – Verification study being
		conducted by Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P.
		Geo. Of Acuity Geoscience Ltd.
		•Drill hole sampling techniques and QAQC
		procedures have been developed and
		reviewed by Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P.
		Geo. of Acuity Geoscience Ltd.,
		Dahrouge Geological Consulting, Ltd.,
		and Allen David V. Heyl, CPG.
		•The QAQC program has demonstrated
		its ability to catch errors.
		•A QAQC review will be completed for this
		program.
		•CRG Mining is creating an Operations Plan
		for the Gold Links Mine (including the 9900
		resource) in preparation for future mine
		development and operations.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number,	•All tenements are 100% owned by
tenement and	location and ownership including	Dateline Resources Limited or a
land tenure	agreements or material issues with	wholly owned subsidiary and there
status	third parties such as joint ventures,	exist production-based royalties as

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

4 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	partnerships, overriding royalties,	previously disclosed to ASX.
	native title interests, historical sites,
	wilderness or national park and
	environmental settings.
	• The security of the tenure held at the
	time of reporting along with any
	known impediments to obtaining a
	licence to operate in the area.
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	•Historical work was completed by various
done by other	exploration by other parties.	groups over 100 years. Review of this work
parties		was completed by Dateline Resources
		Limited
		•All previous work undertaken by others is
		non-JORC compliant.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and	•The Gold Brick Project is hosted by an
	style of mineralisation.	Early Proterozoic assemblage of fine-
		grained meta-sediments and interbedded
		felsitic meta-volcanics. These were
		intruded by Early Proterozoic amphibolites,
		tonalities, granites, and pegmatite dykes.
		Subsequently Tertiary age rhyolitic stocks,
		dikes and sills intrude the Proterozoic
		rocks.
		•The gold and silver mineralization occurs
		in narrow fissure quartz veins. Veins in the
		district trend Northeast with steep Westerly
		dips.
		•The auriferous quartz veins cut
		through the various rock types. They
		have been mined in some cases for
		over 2 kms in strike length and 500 m
		in height. The primary sulphide
		occurring in these veins is pyrite, with
		sphalerite, galena, and chalcopyrite
		as well. Moderately wide zones of
		chloritization, argillization,
		sericitization, and silicification and
		disseminated sulfides have been
		found near the veins.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material
Information	to the understanding of the
	exploration results including a
	tabulation of the following information
	for all Material drill holes:
	`o` easting and northing of the drill hole
	collar
	`o` elevation or RL (Reduced Level
	– elevation above sea level in
	metres) of the drill hole collar
	`o` dip and azimuth of the hole
	`o` down hole length and interception
	depth
	`o` hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the
	information is not Material and this
	exclusion does not detract from
	the understanding of the report, the

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

5 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Competent Person should clearly
	explain why this is the case.
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results,
aggregation	weighting averaging techniques,
methods	maximum and/or minimum grade
	truncations (eg cutting of high grades)
	and cut-off grades are usually Material
	and should be stated.
	• Where aggregate intercepts
	incorporate short lengths of high
	grade results and longer lengths of
	low grade results, the procedure used
	for such aggregation should be stated
	and some typical examples of such
	aggregations should be shown in
	detail.
	• The assumptions used for any
	reporting of metal equivalent values
	should be clearly stated.
Relationship	• These relationships are
between	particularly important in the
mineralisation	reporting of Exploration Results.
widths and	• If the geometry of the
intercept	mineralisation with respect to the
lengths	drill hole angle is known, its
	nature should be reported.
	• If it is not known and only the down
	hole lengths are reported, there should
	be a clear statement to this effect (eg
	‘down hole length, true width not
	known’).
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections	•Supporting figures have been included
	(with scales) and tabulations of	within the body of this release.
	intercepts should be included for
	any significant discovery being
	reported. These should include, but
	not be limited to a plan view of drill
	hole collar locations and appropriate
	sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of	•Representative reporting of both low and
reporting	all Exploration Results is not	high grades have been reported.
	practicable, representative reporting
	of both low and high grades and/or
	widths should be practiced to avoid
	misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful	•	The Gold Brick project has been cut by
substantive	and material, should be reported		numerous, semi-parallel, narrow veins
exploration	including (but not limited to): geological		that are in all the lithologies present and
data	observations; geophysical survey		have demonstrated vertical and
	results; geochemical survey results;		longitudinal continuity. The veins
	bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential	•	mineralization shoots carry precious metal grades that were mined extensively in the past. The Surface Reconnaissance-Target

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

6 | 28 October 2020

Dateline Resources Limited

ASX Release 28 October 2020


Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	deleterious or contaminating		Confirmation program was conducted in
	substances.		steep, densely forested terrain with thick
			skree covered slopes and only
			occasional outcrops or subcrops.
		•	The Au assay results from the Surface
			Reconnaissance-Target Confirmation
			program range from 0.004 ppm Au to
			87.3 ppm Au. There were 32 of the 78
			rock samples (4 sample assays pending)
			with Au assays above 1 pm Au. There
			were 14 of the samples with Au assays
			over 8 ppm Au.
			•The Surface program confirmed the
			horizontal strike lengths of the important
			past producing veins including the
			Volunteer-Chloride as over 2 kms, the
			Raymond as over 1 km, and the Wall
			Street-West Vein as over 1.5 kms. The
			latter has numerous high grade assays
			from the program and will have a higher
			exploration prioritization in the future.
		•	Many other veins with past significant
			mining activity were encountered. The
			trenching and drill platforms of Atlas
			Gold in the 1980’s was confirmed.
		•	Recent drilling (2017-2019) has
			confirmed the historic mining and drilling
			data of the Gold Links and Sacramento
			mines.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned	•At	Gold Brick, future work will include
	further work (eg tests for lateral	expanded drilling the on-strike and down-
	extensions or depth extensions or	dip extensions of the 2150, Wall Street -
	large-scale step-out drilling).	West Vein, preparation for underground
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas	exploitation, finalizing the surface program;
	of possible extensions, including the	reopening, mapping and sampling of
	main geological interpretations and	previously inaccessible underground
	future drilling areas, provided this	workings; as well as infill and expanded
	information is not commercially	surface soil geochemistry, geological
	sensitive.	mapping, and geophysics.

==> picture [47 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

7 | 28 October 2020

AI assistant

DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED Interim / Quarterly Report 2020

64793_rns_2020-10-27_59d12c6f-df42-4fcb-b166-98e67fd7a0c3.pdf

ASX Release

28 October 2020