DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2024

Mar 19, 2024

ASX Release

DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED

(ACN 149 105 653) ASX Code: DTR

CAPITAL STRUCTURE Share Price (19/03/24) $0.016

$23.24 million

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

DIRECTORS & MANAGEMENT

Mark Johnson AO Chairman

Stephen Baghdadi Managing Director Greg Hall Non-Executive Director

Tony Ferguson Non-Executive Director

Bill Lannen Non-Executive Director

John Smith Company Secretary

CONTACT

John Smith Phone: +61 2 9375 2353 Postal Address: Level 29, 2 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 Email: info@datelineresources.com.au

==> picture [72 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

USGS confirm Mountain Pass and Colosseum zircons are “indistinguishable”.

Highlights

• USGS has undertaken zircon aging analysis for Colosseum and Mountain Pass

• The REE concentrations and chondrite-normalised spectra for the “Colosseum zircons are indistinguishable from the Mountain Pass zircons”.

• The error-weighted mean age for the Colosseum zircons is 1,453±44Ma compared to Mountain Pass (ca 1,390-1,440Ma), demonstrating overlap.

• The Colosseum zircons have much lower U and Th (~20-50 ppm each) than Mountain Pass zircons (~100-800 ppm U, ~100-1,400 ppm Th)

Dateline Resources Limited ( Dateline or the Company ) is pleased to provide an update to rare earth studies being undertaken at the Colosseum Project in California. The studies follow on from previous mapping and sampling studies by the Company’s rare earth experts,Anthony Mariano PhD and Tony Mariano Jnr[1] (Marianos) as well as geophysical modelling undertaken in late 2023[2] .

In October 2022, geologists from the United States Geologial Survey ( USGS ) and Dateline’s own REE specialist Mr. Tony Mariano, visited Colosseum and collected samples, including those from a shonkinite dyke within the Colosseum mine area.

The USGS (United States Geological Survey) is a science bureau within the United States Department of the Interior with a budget of US$1.8 billion for 2024.

Samples from previously identified outcrops of fenitized dikes were collected by USGS geologists for further analysis.

Using the available zircons in the samples collected, age dating was performed to obtain geochronological data. Using a SHRIMP-RG ion microprobe[3] , the USGS researchers concluded that REE concentrations and chondrite-normalised spectra for the Colosseum zircons are indistinguishable from the Mountain Pass Rare Earth mine zircons located 10km from Colosseum. This concurs with findings from the Marianos that the outcrops are genetically related and from the same period.

Commenting on the study, Managing Director, Stephen Baghdadi, stated:

“The study by the USGS continues to add weight to the evidence that Colosseum has the potential to host a significant rare earth system with low uranium and thorium content. We have the right geology, the right timing and are in a known and proven rare earth district.”

“Whilst Dateline could have undertaken the age dating work on its own, its reassuring to have these results come from an independent US Federal agency.”

“The immediate focus is on drilling the gold deposit at Colosseum ahead of mine planning for underground mining and a mineral resource update, however we continue to progress planning and studies on the rare earth potential.”

1 ASX Announcement 3 August 2022 – Colosseum rare earths field investigations

2 ASX Announcement 20 October 2023 – Colosseum Rare Earths – Reprocessed data identifies several continuous high-density drill targets

3 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol 56, No. 4 2024

==> picture [569 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Release 20 March 2024
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [529 x 406] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Colosseum open pits. Red dots are the location of the identified fenite samples collected for analysis.

As reported in ASX announcement on February 13, 2024, in addition to the 70.1metres @ 6.53g/t Au intersected within the breccia pipe, the company intersected 1.5 metres @ 31.3g/t Au in the granite near the end of drill hole CM23-14.

Geochemistry study[4] of all the samples from drill hole CM23-14 was undertaken in an effort to determine if there are pathfinder elements that could be used to better target drilling for gold. The outcome of the geochemistry study was succesful and was reported on March 12, 2024. The geochemsitry analysis did not include the full suite of REE elements, however the geochemistry study of hole CM23-14 highlighted that there were elevated REE elements associated with the granite intersected near the end of the drill hole.

The following table shows the totals for the REE elements that were analysed, within the gold bearing breccia pipe, and separately within the granites at the end of drill hole CM23-14. Further analysis, including analysis for additional rare earth elements will be undertaken over the coming weeks.

Description	Cerium(PPM)	Lanthanum(PPM)	Yttrium(PPM)	Total(PPM)
In Breccia Pipe	47.77	22.45	15.57	85.79
In Granite	320.8	154.75	21.96	497.51
% Increase	671.58%	689.17%	141.02%	579.88%

4 ASX Announcement 12 March 2024 – Gold drilling program expanded at Colosseum with second drill rig

ASX Release 20 March 2024

USGS Abstract Summary – Technical Findings

Zircon Geochronology and Geochemistry Insights into A Shonkinite Dyke in the Colosseum Mine Area, Southeastern Mojave Desert, Ca

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 4, 2024. doi: 10.1130/abs/2024CD-399680

Colosseum contains gold deposits hosted in Cretaceous rhyolite breccia pipes, which are much younger than the Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1.4 Ga) alkaline and carbonatite intrusions at the Mountain Pass REE mine.

Shonkinite dykes at Colosseum are mostly aphyric, but analysis of zircon from one sparsely porphyritic dyke enables a preliminary comparison to Mountain Pass zircons. High-spatial resolution (25 micron spot size) zircon data were collected with a SHRIMP-RG ion microprobe.

Due to the very low uranium concentrations (20-45 ppm), zircon U-Pb ages have relatively large errors. Based on 11 concordant analyses and excluding 14 other analyses based on discordance or very high (>100 Myr) single spot age errors, the error-weighted mean[207] Pb/[206] Pb age is 1,453 ± 44 Ma.

Within error, these ages overlap the older end of the known age range of zircons from the Mountain Pass mafic alkaline intrusions (ca. 1,390-1,440 Ma).

Three concordant, inherited Paleoproterozoic zircons were also documented in the Colosseum sample, with[207] Pb/[206] Pb ages of 1,623 ± 18 Ma, 1,643 ± 29 Ma, and 1,773 ± 30 Ma.

The inherited Paleoproterozoic zircons have much higher U (190-470 ppm), and a distinctly negative Eu anomaly in their chondrite-normalized REE spectra (0.1-0.3 ppm Eu), which is lacking in the primary Colosseum zircons (0.9-2.6 ppm Eu).

The REE concentrations and chondrite-normalized spectra for the Colosseum zircons are indistinguishable from the Mountain Pass zircons; however, the Colosseum zircons have much lower U and Th (~20-50 ppm each) than Mountain Pass zircons (~100-800 ppm U, ~100-1,400 ppm Th).

This announcement has been authorised for release on ASX by the Company’s Board of Directors.

For more information: Stephen Baghdadi Andrew Rowell Managing Director White Noise Communications +61 2 9375 2353 +61 400 466 226 www.datelineresources.com.au andrew@whitenoisecomms.com

Follow Dateline on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Dateline_DTR

About Dateline Resources Limited

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) is an Australian publicly listed company focused on mining and exploration in North America. The Company owns 100% of the Colosseum Gold-REE Project in California.

The Colosseum Gold Mine is located in the Walker Lane Trend in East San Bernardino County, California. On July 6, 2022, the Company announced to the ASX that the Colosseum Gold mine has a JORC-2012 compliant Mineral Resource estimate of 20.9Mt @ 1.2g/t Au for 813,000oz. Of the total Mineral Resource, 258koz @ 1.2g/t Au (32%) are classified as Measured, 322koz @ 1.2g/t Au (39%) as Indicated and 235koz @ 1.3g/t Au (29%) as Inferred.

The Colosseum is located less than 10km north of the Mountain Rare Earth mine. Work has commenced on identifying the source of the mantle derived rocks that are associated with carbonatites and are located at Colosseum.

ASX Release 20 March 2024

Forward-Looking Statements

This announcement may contain “forward-looking statements” concerning Dateline Resources that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Generally, the words “will”, “may”, “should”, “continue”, “believes”, “expects”, “intends”, “anticipates” or similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Many of these risks and uncertainties relate to factors that are beyond Dateline Resources’ ability to control or estimate precisely, such as future market conditions, changes in regulatory environment and the behaviour of other market participants. Dateline Resources cannot give any assurance that such forward-looking statements will prove to have been correct. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Dateline Resources assumes no obligation and does not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any of the forward-looking statements set out herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent legally required.

Competent Person Statement

Sample preparation and any exploration information in this announcement is based upon work reviewed by Mr Greg Hall who is a Chartered Professional of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CP-IMM). Mr Hall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to quality as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (JORC Code). Mr Hall is a Non-Executive Director of Dateline Resources Limited and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

ASX Release 20 March 2024

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut		• As of 09/03/2024 the Colosseum Mine, Colosseum
techniques	channels, random chips, or specific		Rare Metals, INC. has completed 712 metres of
	specialised industry standard		drilling in 3 drill holes from 2024. All of the
	measurement tools appropriate to the		drilling was done from surface with a diamond
	minerals under investigation, such as		drill core. Industry standard core handling and
	down hole gamma sondes, or handheld		sampling procedures were employed to ensure
	XRF instruments, etc). These examples		high quality samples.
	should not be taken as limiting the broad		• Core sample boundaries were defined by changes
	meaning of sampling.		in lithology, alteration, and mineralisation noted
	• Include reference to measures taken to		in logging.
	ensure sample representivity and	the	• Collar to toe assays were taken and sent to labs
	appropriate calibration of	any	for analysis.
	measurement tools or systems used.		• Core was cut along the long axis leaving half for
	• Aspects of the determination of		assay and half to be stored in cardboard core
	mineralisation that are Material to the		boxes.
	Public Report.		• Samples from drill holes were sent to ALS Global
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work		and Paragon Geochemical in Reno, Nevada for
	has been done this would be relatively		sample preparation and assay. Samples were
	simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was		dried, weighed, crushed and split to obtain 250
	used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3		gm. Samples were placed in ring and puck grinder
	kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g		to produce 85% minus 75-micron pulp. This
	charge for fire assay’). In other cases more		material was blended on clean cloth and
	explanation may be required, such as		packaged in paper pulp bags. Using a pulp
	where there is coarse gold that has		balance, a 30-gm sample was weighted out for
	inherent sampling problems. Unusual		traditional fire assay. Samples were analyzed
	commodities or mineralisation types (eg		using standard fire assay for gold. Over limits
	submarine nodules) may warrant		were analyzed via gravimetric analysis.
	disclosure of detailed information.		• All samples followed a strict Chain of Custody.
			• Routine QAQC samples were inserted in the
			sample runs at a rate of 20%, comprising Certified
			Reference Materials from CDN Resource
			Laboratories Ltd., and verified blank granitic
			material.
			• Surface sampling of dump material was taken at
			random surrounding the Colosseum pits to test
			approximate grades of dumps.
			• Sampling practice is appropriate to the geology
			and mineralisation of the deposit and complies
			with industry best practice.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation,		• The drilling program utilizes surface core drilling.
techniques	open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,		• The core drilling is being conducted with an
	auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg		Discovery drill rig with HQTT core tooling. Triple
	core diameter, triple or standard tube,		tubes were used for the for all holes to increase
	depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit		recoveries. The drilling has been completed by an
	or other type, whether core is oriented		experienced diamond drilling core driller.
	and if so, by what method, etc).

ASX Release 20 March 2024

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill sample	• Method of recording and assessing core	• All drilling recoveries have been logged and
recovery	and chip sample recoveries and results	notated each run based on 3.05-meter
	assessed.	tooling.
	• Measures taken to maximise	• To maximize sample recoveries, use of triple
	sample recovery and ensure	tube and long chain polymer muds were
	representative nature of the	used to increase recovery.
	samples.	• There has been no analysis between sample
	• Whether a relationship exists between	recoveries and grade to date.
	sample recovery and grade and whether
	sample bias may have occurred due to
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
	material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have	• Core samples were geologically logged. Lithology,
	been geologically and geotechnically	veining, alteration, mineralisation, and weathering
	logged to a level of detail to support	are recorded in the appropriate tables of the drill
	appropriate Mineral Resource	hole database.
	estimation, mining studies and	• Each core box was photographed dry and wet,
	metallurgical studies.	after logging of unit and structures were notated
	• Whether logging is qualitative or	on the core.
	quantitative in nature. Core (or	• Core was cut along the long axis using a diamond
	costean, channel, etc) photography.	saw, half-core was sampled, and half stored for
	• The total length and percentage of the	reference.
	relevant intersections logged.	• Geological logging of core samples is
		qualitative and quantitative in nature.
Sub-sampling	• If core, whether cut or sawn and	• All drill core samples were cut along the long axis.
techniques and	whether quarter, half or all core taken.	The left side when looking down hole was sampled.
sample	• If non-core, whether riffled, tube	Samples were placed in a heavy-duty poly sample
preparation	sampled, rotary split, etc and	bag. Each core sample placed in heavy duty poly
	whether sampled wet or dry.	sample bag, noted interval width in sample book,
	• For all sample types, the nature,	with a sample tag with the corresponding sample
	quality and appropriateness of the	number placed in the bag with the other tag stapled
	sample preparation technique.	to the top of the bag. Sample bags were stapled
	• Quality control procedures adopted for	along the top. Samples were sent by freight to ALS
	all sub-sampling stages to maximise	Global, or Paragon Geochemical in Reno, Nevada.
	representivity of samples.	• Routine QAQC samples were inserted at a 20% rate
	• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling	into the sample batches and comprised Certified
	is representative of the in situ material	Reference Materials (CRMs) from CDN Resource
	collected, including for instance results for	Laboratories Ltd. and verified blank granitic
	field duplicate/second-half sampling.	material.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the	• Rock samples sent to ALS Laboratories and
	grain size of the material being sampled.	Paragon Geochemical were dried, weighed,
		crushed, and split, with a split pulverized to better
		than 85% passing 75 microns. Samples were
		analyzed for trace elements using 4-acid digestion.
		Additionally, rocks samples were analyzed by
		standard 30gm fire assay for gold and silver.
		• Rock samples collected by the USGS were analysed
		at the USGS laboratories in accordance with
		accepted industry best standards.
		• Sample size assessment was not conducted but
		used sampling size which is typical for gold
		deposits.

ASX Release 20 March 2024

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Quality of	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of	• Samples were assayed by industry standard
assay data	the assaying and laboratory procedures	methods by ALS Global Laboratories, and Paragon
and	used and whether the technique is	Geochemical, in Reno, Nevada.
laboratory	considered partial or total.	• Fire assays for gold were completed using
tests	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	industry standard fire assay methodology.
	handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	• External certified standards and blank material
	parameters used in determining the analysis	were added to the sample submission.
	including instrument make and model,	• Rock samples collected by the USGS were analysed
	reading times, calibrations factors applied	at the USGS laboratories in accordance with
	and their derivation, etc.	accepted industry best standards.
	• Nature of quality control procedures
	adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
	external laboratory checks) and whether
	acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
	and precision have been established.
Verification of	• The verification of significant	• Sampling, documentation, and sample submittal
sampling and	intersections by either independent or	were under the guidance and care of Graham Craig,
assaying	alternative company personnel.	GIT (Association of Professional Engineers and
	• The use of twinned holes.	Geoscientists of Manitoba).
	• Documentation of primary data,	• Drilling, sample, and assay data is currently
	data entry procedures, data	stored in MX Deposit, a secured data
	verification, data storage (physical	management system through Seequent.
	and electronic) protocols.	• Intercept lengths and grades calculated using
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	approximately 1 g/t Au as the cutoff.
		• Rock samples collected by the USGS was in the
		presence of experienced USGS geologists and
		Consulting Mineral Exploration geologist,
		Anthony Mariano
Location of	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate	• All drill hole collars are surveyed using differential GPS
data points	drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys),	survey equipment. The positions are accurate to
	trenches, mine workings and other locations	within 10 cm x-y and height (z) to +/- 20 cm.
	used in Mineral Resource estimation.	• The holes are surveyed in UTM WGS 84
	• Specification of the grid system used.	coordinate system.
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic	• Down hole surveys will be done using a Reflex EZ-
	control.	TRAC magnetic downhole survey tool on all
		diamond drill holes. With collars surveyed using
		Reflex TN-14 Azi-Aligner.
		• Sample locations were surveyed using UTM WGS
		84 coordinate system.
		• All samples collected by the USGS were located
		using GPS equipment
Data spacing	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration	• The spacing and location of data is currently 5-15
and	Results.	meter spacing according to previous Mineral
distribution	• Whether the data spacing, and distribution	Resource estimation completed by Barbara
	is sufficient to establish the degree of	Carroll, CPG (American Institute of Professional
	geological and grade continuity appropriate	Geologists) of GeoGRAFX Consulting, LLC.
	for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve	• No sample compositing has been applied at this time.
	estimation procedure(s) and classifications
	applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has been
	applied.

ASX Release 20 March 2024

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Orientation of	• Whether the orientation of sampling	• Drill holes are planned to be drilled along strike due
data in	achieves unbiased sampling of possible	to limited areas available to drill from. Definition of
relation to	structures and the extent to which this is	structure location is the principal goal.
geological	known, considering the deposit type.	• Sample orientation is deemed to be
structure	• If the relationship between the drilling	representative for reporting purposes.
	orientation and the orientation of key	• No bias is considered to have been introduced
	mineralised structures is considered to	by the existing sampling orientation.
	have introduced a sampling bias, this
	should be assessed and reported if
	material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	• All samples were taken and maintained under
security	security.	the constant care of Colosseum Rare Metals, INC.
		personnel or United States Geological Survey
		(USGS) employees. Samples were delivered to
		laboratories by a licensed transportation
		company or transported by USGS employees for
		analysis by USGS laboratory staff.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	• Drill hole sampling techniques and QAQC
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	procedures have been developed and reviewed
		by Dale Sketchley, M.Sc., P. Geo. of Acuity
		Geoscience Ltd., Graham Craig, GIT.
		• The QAQC program has demonstrated its ability
		to catch errors.
		• A QAQC review will be completed for this program.
		• Mineral resource estimations and JORC 2022
		completed by Barbara Carroll, CPG.

ASX Release 20 March 2024

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number, location and		• The Colosseum Mine project is located in T17N
tenement and	ownership including agreements or		R13E Sec 10, 11, 14, 15, 22, 23 SB&M.
land tenure status	material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.		• All tenements are 100% owned by Dateline Resources Limited or a wholly owned subsidiary and there exist production-based royalties as previously disclosed to ASX.
	• The security of the tenure held at the time
	of reporting along with any known
	impediments to obtaining a licence to
	operate in the area.
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration		• Historical work has been completed by various
done by other	by other parties.		mining companies since 1972.
parties			Draco Mines (1972-1974)
			Placer Amex (1975-1976)
			Draco Mines (1980)
			Amselco (1982-1984
			Dallhold Resources/Bond Gold (1986-1989
			Lac Minerals (1989-1994)
			• All the companies were reputable, well-known
			mining/exploration companies that followed the
			accepted industry standard protocols of the time.
			• Review of this work was completed by GeoGRAFX
			Consulting, LLC in 2022.
			• All previous work undertaken by others is non-JORC
			compliant.
			• The USGS collected samples for age dating analysis
			as disclosed in the body of this ASX release
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of		• The Colosseum mine is hosted by Cretaceous aged
	mineralisation.		breccia-pipe. The pipe contains aphanitic
			Cretaceous rhyolite flows, Pre-Cambrian granitic
			basement material, and Cambrian-Devonian
			dolomite clasts replaced by sulphide
			mineralisation.
			• The gold mineralisation occurs in brecciated
			felsite and sediment clast replaced by sulphides.
			• The Argos mine is a flat, shallow-dipping
			sedimentary strontium deposit hosted in celestite.
			The celestite bed is overlain by various surface
			sediments with volcanics, primarily mafic
			volcanics, on the footwall. The mine was
			previously trenched along two trenches running
			approximately east to west at 1-3 metres in depth.
			There was one underground access mined
			historically that accessed from within the celestite
			layer to approximately 12 metres deep with
			limited east/west development at the bottom.

ASX Release 20 March 2024

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material to the		• See Table 1 within this report for details of
Information	understanding of the exploration results		the drill holes and sample locations.
	including a tabulation of the following
	information for all Material drill holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
	elevation above sea level in metres) of
	the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is justified
	on the basis that the information is not
	Material, and this exclusion does not detract
	from
	the understanding of the report, the
	Competent Person should clearly explain why
	this is the case.
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting		• Drill hole intersections are reported above a
aggregation	averaging techniques, maximum and/or		lower exploration cut-off grade of 0.1 g/T Au
methods	minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of		and no upper cut off grade has been applied.
	high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
	Material and should be stated.
	• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
	short lengths of high-grade results and
	longer lengths of low grade results, the
	procedure used for such aggregation should
	be stated and some typical examples of such
	aggregations should be shown in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any reporting of
	metal equivalent values should be clearly
	stated.
Relationship	• These relationships are particularly		• Drill holes are orientated along
between	important in the reporting of		apparent strike of the breccia pipe
mineralisation	Exploration Results.		due to limited drill pad locations.
widths and	• If the geometry of the mineralisation		• Interception angles of the
intercept	with respect to the drill hole angle is		mineralised structures are
lengths	known, its nature should be reported.		estimated using core drilling
	• If it is not known and only the down hole		intercepts and existing 3D models
	lengths are reported, there should be a clear		of the pipe orientation.
	statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length,
	true width not known’).
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with		• Supporting figures have been included within the
	scales) and tabulations of intercepts should		body of this release.
	be included for any significant discovery
	being
	reported These should include, but not be
	limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
	locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of all		• Representative reporting of both low and high
reporting	Exploration Results is not practicable,		grades and/or widths have been reported.
	representative reporting of both low and
	high grades and/or widths should be
	practiced avoiding misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.

ASX Release 20 March 2024

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and
substantive	material, should be reported including (but not
exploration	limited to): geological observations;
data	geophysical survey results; geochemical survey
	results; bulk samples – size and method of
	treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
	density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
	characteristics; potential deleterious or
	contaminating substances.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further		• At Colosseum, future work will include expanded
	work (eg tests for lateral extensions or		drilling between the North and South pits,
	depth extensions or large-scale step-out		mapping, and sampling of open pit benches; as
	drilling).		well as infill and expanded surface soil
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of		geochemistry, geological mapping, and
	possible extensions, including the main		geophysics.
	geological interpretations and future drilling
	areas, provided this information is not
	commercially sensitive.