AI assistant
DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2022
Apr 20, 2022
64793_rns_2022-04-20_36030375-4acb-4c99-9b02-31694a6c68de.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Gold Links Production Update
ASX Release
DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED
(ACN 149 105 653)
Highlights
-
12 tons of gold concentrate have been produced from the Gold Links
-
Assays received for first three tons of concentrate average over 900g/t Au.
==> picture [72 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
-
Offtake agreement in final stages of negotiation with three groups
-
Agreement signed with Komatsu for the supply of underground mining fleet.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Share Price (20/04/22) $0.12 Shares on issue 438 million Market Cap $52.55 million
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) ( Dateline or the Company ) is pleased to announce the production of saleable gold concentrate from the Gold Links mine in Colorado, USA.
During the months of March and April, the company trucked ore from the Gold Links mine and processed it at the Lucky Strike Mill (The mill). The mill operated on a 24-hour basis for four days per week using mostly diluted development ore.
To date, the Company has produced 12 tons of saleable gold concentrate.
Assays for the first three tons of concentrate have been received and are listed in the table below
DIRECTORS & MANAGEMENT
Mark Johnson AO Chairman
Stephen Baghdadi Managing Director
Greg Hall Non-Executive Director
Tony Ferguson Non-Executive Director
Bill Lannen Non-Executive Director
Mark Ohlsson Company Secretary
| Description | Weight | Assay (g/t Au) | Assay (g/t Ag) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bag1 | 1 ton | 963.71 | 1,695.12 |
| Bag2 | 1 ton | 587.05 | 914.18 |
| Bag3 | 1 ton | 1,219.52 | 2,124.87 |
| Average | 1 ton | 923.42 | 1,578.06 |
A bigger sample size has been collected from 11 bags of concentrate including the first three and have been split equally to be assayed by two separate labs. Results will be reported once they are received.
Milling at the Lucky Strike will commence operations on a 24/7 basis in May 2022.
The Company has entered into an equipment supply agreement with Komatsu USA for the supply of a fleet of new/near new mining equipment for Gold Links. The first three items were delivered in April and the remaining two items will be delivered in late May and June 2022.
The supply of the new mining fleet and ramping up of processing rates means that the Company was able to recruit new experienced personnel and move to a 24/7 schedule for mining activities.
CONTACT
Mark Ohlsson
Phone: +61 2 9375 2353
Postal Address: P.O. Box 553 South Hurstville NSW 2221
Email: [email protected]
Commenting on the milestone, Dateline’s Managing Director, Stephen Baghdadi, said:
“The amount of concentrate produced to date has been done on a limited work week. We expect production to increase substantially once we start milling on a 24/7 basis”
“With the transition to a mine owner operator model and having our own fleet, we can start to plan the development of the balance of our substantial property holdings that make up the Gold Links group of mining claims”
“Whilst we have reached this first production milestone, we have much more to achieve at Gold Links as we install additional processing capacity and ramp up production over the remainder of 2022.”
ASX Release 21 April 2022
Processing Plant Commissioning Update
The Company is pleased to report that processing at the Company’s 100% owned Lucky Strike processing plant is progressing well, with no major issues identified. Most of the commissioning activities were undertaken using low to medium-grade development ore.
The mill was operated on a four day a week basis which necessitated almost two days out of four for shut down and start-up of the mill
The newly acquired 250tpd mill and associated flotation circuit in the process of being installed and expected to be operational in June 2022
==> picture [518 x 389] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1 250tpd flotation cells and conditioning tank delivered to site on April 19
Offtake Agreement
To date, approximately 12 tons of concentrate has been produced for sale. The Company is in the final stages of completing a competitive tender process for offtake from Gold Links, with the Company narrowing down the potential offtake parties to three.
The first concentrate sale is expected to be completed in late April/early May with regular shipments thereafter.
ASX Release 21 April 2022
Transition to Owner Miner
The Company has made the decision to transition from a contract miner to owner miner model and has entered into an equipment supply agreement with Komatsu USA to facilitate this change.
The new/near new equipment, which includes trucks, boggers and a jumbo, will be delivered to site starting April. As an owner miner, the Company will have increased flexibility with regards to the timing of ore vs development mining, whilst the near/near new equipment is expected to provide higher productivity and availability levels than was provided by the mining contractor.
==> picture [396 x 223] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2 Three of the five pieces of Komatsu equipment received in April
Underground Mining Update
Most of the underground mining activities since the start of the year have focused on the establishment of two development drives and the transport of development ore to Lucky Strike for commissioning activities.
The Company has recently commenced stoping activities, with high-grade ore being transported to the plant for the first time. It is expected that stoping activities will increase over the next month as we move to a 24/7 operation.
==> picture [400 x 225] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3 Miners evaluating next round following the ~1-metre wide quartz sericite altered and oxidized vein in 9875 North.
ASX Release 21 April 2022
Underground Drilling
Underground exploration is continuing, with recent drilling targeting deeper zones to the north of previous drilling. Drill core shows zones of sulphides in line with what is expected with the 2150 vein. Samples have been sent to the lab and results are pending
==> picture [213 x 283] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [212 x 282] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4 Section of core showing the large 3.7 metre mineralized vein material. Vein is intensely quartz sericite altered with stringers of sphalerite, galena, and pyrite sulfidation, which is where the gold is associated.
==> picture [432 x 259] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5 Senior geologist inspecting drill rig and reviewing drill plan with drillers on active underground drill program.
ASX Release 21 April 2022
This announcement has been authorised for release on ASX by the Company's Board of Directors.
For more information, please contact:
Stephen Baghdadi Managing Director +61 2 9375 2353 www.datelineresources.com.au
Follow Dateline on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Dateline_DTR
About Dateline Resources Limited
Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) is an Australian publicly listed company focused on gold mining and exploration in North America. The Company owns 100% of the Gold Links and Green Mountain Projects in Colorado, USA and 100% of the Colosseum Gold Mine in California.
The Gold Links Gold Mine is a historic high-grade gold mining project where over 150,000 ounces of gold was mined from highgrade veins. Mineralisation can be traced on surface and underground for almost 6km from the Northern to the Southern sections of the project. Ore mining commenced in late 2022, with first saleable gold concentrate produced in April 2022.
The Company owns the Lucky Strike gold mill, located 50km from the Gold Links mine, within the Green Mountain Project. Ore is transported to Lucky Strike for processing.
The Colosseum Gold Mine is located in the Walker Lane Trend in East San Bernardino County, California and produced approximately 344,000 ounces of gold (see ASX release 15 March 2021). Significant potential remains for extension to mineralisation at depth as well as potential for rare earth elements.
Competent Person Statement
Sample preparation and any exploration information in this announcement is based upon work reviewed by Mr Greg Hall who is a Chartered Professional of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CP-IMM). Mr Hall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to quality as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (JORC Code). Mr Hall is a Non-Executive Director of Dateline Resources Limited and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.
ASX Release 21 April 2022
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut | • The concentrate bags have a total capacity of 2,000 |
| techniques | channels, random chips, or specific | LBS (one short ton). The bag dimensions are 41 |
| specialised industry standard | inches in length and 41 inches in width. To gain a | |
| measurement tools appropriate to the | representative sample, we used a one-inch diameter | |
| minerals under investigation, such as | PVC pipe that was three feet long. The pipe was | |
| down hole gamma sondes, or handheld | driven down the concentrate inside the bag. As the | |
| XRF instruments, etc). These examples | pipe goes down concentrate is filling the pipe taking | |
| should not be taken as limiting the broad | a sample from all levels of the concentrate in the | |
| meaning of sampling. | bag. This method was done on all 4 sides and in the | |
| • Include reference to measures taken to | middle of the concentrate bag. The sample | |
| ensure sample representivity and the | produced was placed in a sample bag with an | |
| appropriate calibration of any |
average wet weight 1.474 KG. The samples were | |
| measurement tools or systems used. | then transferred to the site Geologist and shipped to | |
| • Aspects of the determination of | KCA Laboratory in Reno Nevada for Assay. | |
| mineralisation that are Material to the | ||
| Public Report. | ||
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work | ||
| has been done this would be relatively | ||
| simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was | ||
| used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 | ||
| kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g | ||
| charge for fire assay’). In other cases | ||
| more explanation may be required, such | ||
| as where there is coarse gold that has | ||
| inherent sampling problems. Unusual | ||
| commodities or mineralisation types (eg | ||
| submarine nodules) may warrant | ||
| disclosure of detailed information. | ||
| Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, | |
| techniques | open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, | |
| auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg | ||
| core diameter, triple or standard tube, | ||
| depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit | ||
| or other type, whether core is oriented | ||
| and if so, by what method, etc). | ||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing core | |
| recovery | and chip sample recoveries and results | |
| assessed. | ||
| • Measures taken to maximise | ||
| sample recovery and ensure | ||
| representative nature of the |
ASX Release 21 April 2022
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
| samples. | ||
| • Whether a relationship exists between | ||
| sample recovery and grade and whether | ||
| sample bias may have occurred due to | ||
| preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse | ||
| material. | ||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have | |
| been geologically and geotechnically | ||
| logged to a level of detail to support | ||
| appropriate Mineral Resource | ||
| estimation, mining studies and | ||
| metallurgical studies. | ||
| • Whether logging is qualitative or | ||
| quantitative in nature. Core (or | ||
| costean, channel, etc) photography. | ||
| • The total length and percentage of the | ||
| relevant intersections logged. | ||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and | |
| techniques and | whether quarter, half or all core | |
| sample | taken. | |
| preparation | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube | |
| sampled, rotary split, etc and | ||
| whether sampled wet or dry. | ||
| • For all sample types, the nature, | ||
| quality and appropriateness of the | ||
| sample preparation technique. | ||
| • Quality control procedures adopted for | ||
| all sub-sampling stages to maximise | ||
| representivity of samples. | ||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling | ||
| is representative of the in situ material | ||
| collected, including for instance results for | ||
| field duplicate/second-half sampling. | ||
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the | ||
| grain size of the material being sampled. | ||
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of | |
| assay data | the assaying and laboratory procedures | |
| and | used and whether the technique is | |
| laboratory | considered partial or total. | |
| tests | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, | |
| handheld XRF instruments, etc, the | ||
| parameters used in determining the | ||
| analysis including instrument make and | ||
| model, reading times, calibrations factors | ||
| applied and their derivation, etc. | ||
| • Nature of quality control procedures | ||
| adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, | ||
| external laboratory checks) and whether | ||
| acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of | ||
| bias) and precision have been established. |
ASX Release 21 April 2022
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
| Verification | of |
• The verification of significant | |
| sampling | and | intersections by either independent or | |
| assaying | alternative company personnel. | ||
| • The use of twinned holes. | |||
| • Documentation of primary data, | |||
| data entry procedures, data | |||
| verification, data storage | |||
| (physical and electronic) | |||
| protocols. | |||
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | |||
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to | ||
| data points | locate drill holes (collar and down-hole | ||
| surveys), trenches, mine workings and other | |||
| locations used in Mineral Resource | |||
| estimation. | |||
| • Specification of the grid system used. | |||
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic | |||
| control. | |||
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration | ||
| and distribution | Results. | ||
| • Whether the data spacing and distribution | |||
| is sufficient to establish the degree of | |||
| geological and grade continuity | |||
| appropriate for the Mineral Resource and | |||
| Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and | |||
| classifications applied. | |||
| • Whether sample compositing has been | |||
| applied. | |||
| Orientation | of | • Whether the orientation of sampling | |
| data in relation | achieves unbiased sampling of possible | ||
| to geological | structures and the extent to which this is | ||
| structure | known, considering the deposit type. | ||
| • If the relationship between the drilling | |||
| orientation and the orientation of key | |||
| mineralised structures is considered to | |||
| have introduced a sampling bias, this | |||
| should be assessed and reported if | |||
| material. | |||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample | ||
| security | security. | ||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of | ||
| reviews | sampling techniques and data. |
ASX Release 21 April 2022
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location | |
| tenement and | and ownership including agreements or | |
| land tenure | material issues with third parties such as | |
| status | joint ventures, partnerships, overriding | |
| royalties, native title interests, historical | ||
| sites, wilderness or national park and | ||
| environmental settings. | ||
| • The security of the tenure held at the time | ||
| of reporting along with any known | ||
| impediments to obtaining a licence to | ||
| operate in the area. | ||
| Exploration done | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration | |
| by other parties | by other parties. | |
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of | |
| mineralisation. | ||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information material to | |
| Information | the understanding of the exploration results | |
| including a tabulation of the following | ||
| information for all Material drill holes: | ||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar |
||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – |
||
| elevation above sea level in metres) | ||
| of the drill hole collar | ||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
||
o down hole length and interception depth |
||
o hole length. |
||
| • If the exclusion of this information is justified | ||
| on the basis that the information is not | ||
| Material and this exclusion does not detract | ||
| from | ||
| the understanding of the report, the | ||
| Competent Person should clearly explain why | ||
| this is the case. | ||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | |
| aggregation | averaging techniques, maximum and/or | |
| methods | minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of | |
| high grades) and cut-off grades are usually | ||
| Material and should be stated. | ||
| • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate | ||
| short lengths of high grade results and | ||
| longer lengths of low grade results, the | ||
| procedure used for such aggregation should | ||
| be stated and some typical examples of such | ||
| aggregations should be shown in detail. | ||
| • The assumptions used for any reporting of | ||
| metal equivalent values should be clearly |
ASX Release 21 April 2022
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
| stated. | ||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly | |
| between | important in the reporting of | |
| mineralisation | Exploration Results. | |
| widths and | • If the geometry of the mineralisation | |
| intercept lengths | with respect to the drill hole angle is | |
| known, its nature should be reported. | ||
| • If it is not known and only the down hole | ||
| lengths are reported, there should be a clear | ||
| statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole | ||
| length, true width not known’). | ||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with | |
| scales) and tabulations of intercepts | ||
| should be included for any significant | ||
| discovery being | ||
| reported These should include, but not be | ||
| limited to a plan view of drill hole collar | ||
| locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all | |
| reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, | |
| representative reporting of both low and | ||
| high grades and/or widths should be | ||
| practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | ||
| Exploration Results. | ||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and | . |
| substantive | material, should be reported including (but | |
| exploration | not limited to): geological observations; | |
| data | geophysical survey results; geochemical | |
| survey results; bulk samples – size and method | ||
| of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk | ||
| density, | ||
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock | ||
| characteristics; potential deleterious | ||
| or contaminating substances. | ||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further | |
| work (eg tests for lateral extensions or | ||
| depth extensions or large-scale step-out | ||
| drilling). | ||
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | ||
| possible extensions, including the main | ||
| geological interpretations and future drilling | ||
| areas, provided this information is not | ||
| commercially sensitive. |