DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2021

Nov 24, 2021

ASX Release

DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED

(ACN 149 105 653) ASX Code: DTR

==> picture [72 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

56g/t gold and 384g/t silver intersected at Gold Links

Highlights

• High-grade gold intersections up to 56.74g/t gold and 384g/t silver intersected at Gold Links as part of the underground drilling program

• Significant intersections include:

• CRG21-027: 1.6m @ 29.2g/t Au & 197g/t Ag inc. 0.6m @ 56.74g/t Au and 384g/t Ag

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Share Price (24/11/21) $0.082

$35.9 million

• CRG21-025: 1.2m @ 13.92g/t Au & 27g/t Ag and 1.4m @ 5.53g/t Au & 9g/t Ag

• CRG21-026: 0.8m @ 15.74g/t Au & 106g/t Ag

• Results are in line with grade and width expectations for the 2150 vein

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) ( Dateline or the Company ) is pleased to announce high-grade gold intersections returned from its 4,000-metre underground drilling program at the Gold Links Gold Project, located in Gunnison County, Colorado:

Commenting on the results, Dateline’s Managing Director, Stephen Baghdadi, said:

DIRECTORS & MANAGEMENT

Mark Johnson AO Chairman

Stephen Baghdadi Managing Director

Greg Hall Non-Executive Director

Tony Ferguson Non-Executive Director

Bill Lannen Non-Executive Director

Mark Ohlsson Company Secretary

CONTACT Mark Ohlsson Phone: +61 2 9375 2353 Postal Address: P.O. Box 553 South Hurstville NSW 2221 Email: info@datelineresources.com.au

“The Gold Links project is a high-grade multi-vein gold system. These results are in line with our expectations and support the case that significant high-grade mineralisation continues below the old workings”.

To date, the best assay results have been achieved when we have drilled into the sediments and below the old workings, this will remain the case as we head north in the decline.

Intersection Details

The current phase of the underground drilling program is aimed at extending a known mineralised zone which was drilled between 1975 and 1985. The Company has so far completed eight out of a planned 10 holes from this drill station. Results for three of the holes have been returned and five remain outstanding

==> picture [396 x 265] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 - Schematic showing new drill holes into the 2150 vein in green. Scale is in feet

ASX Release 25 November 2021

CRG21-025 contained two intersections approximately 7 metres apart and graded 13.92g/t Au and 27g/t Ag over 1.2 metres in the first section and 1.4 metres at 5.53g/t Au and 9g/t Ag in the second section. This hole was designed to test further into the hangingwall and in between intercepts from CRG21-004 and CRG21-006, which assayed 9.7g/t Au and 17.95g/t Au respectively as disclosed in the September 2021 Quarterly report.

CRG21-027 returned an assay result of 1.6 metres at 29.2g/t Au and 197g/t Ag. This hole was designed to confirm three historical high-grade intercepts.

CRG21-026 returned an assay result of 0.8m at @15.74g/t Au and 106g/t Ag. This hole was designed to target approximately 50 feet (15.2 metres) south of CRG21-027 and test the strike to the south of the known mineralised envelope.

Further details on the drilling and assay methodology can be found in Table 1 at the end of this report.

Underground Development Progress

As noted above, the drilling program requires the development of 1,000m of underground development. The development will be used as a haulage route and for underground exploration. To date, 700 metres of development has been completed, or approximately 70% of the planned program.

Following the initial preparation works required to commence development, the weekly development rate is progressing in line with forecast. The Company anticipates completion of the current underground development program before the end of 2021.

Importantly, the development is approximately 80 metres away from completion of a second escapeway, expected to be completed in mid-December. The completion of the second escapeway is an important milestone for the Company as it allows for alternative access when the Company commits to mining and stoping activities as part of the planned transition to production.

==> picture [521 x 348] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 – Long section view of ore zones annotated - Gold Links Project scale is in feet

ASX Release 25 November 2021

Production Strategy

The current program of underground development and drilling has been designed to support the Company’s plans to commence commercial production from Gold Links in the near term. The information being gathered, and the infrastructure being established will allow the Company to transition from developer to producer with minimal additional capital expenditure.

The Company anticipates the decision to commit to production will be made before the end of 2021.

==> picture [538 x 360] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Schematic view of underground development progress

This announcement has been authorised for release on ASX by the Company's Board of Directors.

For more information, please contact:

Stephen Baghdadi Managing Director +61 2 9375 2353 www.datelineresources.com.au

Follow Dateline on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Dateline_DTR

ASX Release 25 November 2021

About Dateline Resources Limited

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) is an Australian publicly listed company focused on gold mining and exploration in North America. The Company owns 100% of the Gold Links and Green Mountain Projects in Colorado, USA and has an agreement to acquire 100% of the Colosseum Gold Mine in California.

The Gold Links Gold Mine is a historic high-grade gold mining project where over 150,000 ounces of gold was mined from high-grade veins. Mineralisation can be traced on surface and underground for almost 6km from the Northern to the Southern sections of the project. The Company aims to delineate sufficient Mineral Resources to commence a small high-grade, low-cost operation by the end of 2021.

The Company owns the Lucky Strike gold mill, located 50km from the Gold Links mine, within the Green Mountain Project. It is proposed that ore from Gold Links would be transported to Lucky Strike for processing.

The Colosseum Gold Mine is located in the Walker Lane Trend in East San Bernardino County, California and produced approximately 344,000 ounces of gold (see ASX release 15 March 2021). Significant potential remains for extension to mineralization at depth.

Competent Person Statement

Sample preparation and any exploration information in this announcement is based upon work reviewed by Mr Greg Hall who is a Chartered Professional of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CP-IMM). Mr Hall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to quality as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (JORC Code). Mr Hall is a Non-Executive Director of Dateline Resources Limited and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

ASX Release 25 November 2021

Drill-hole table (for drill holes with greater than 0.2g/t Au)

Sample_ID	Hole_ID	Drill Type	From (m)	To (m)	Length (m)	Au ppm	Ag ppm
326245	CRG21-003	Core	33.4	33.7	0.3	0.21	3.49
326246	CRG21-003	Core	33.7	33.9	0.2	2.57	38.30
326247	CRG21-003	Core	33.9	34.0	0.2	1.03	8.20
326248	CRG21-003	Core	34.0	34.4	0.4	0.89	10.80
E255055	CRG21-004	Core	17.2	17.8	0.6	15.20	60.70
E255056	CRG21-004	Core	17.8	19.4	1.6	7.73	77.90
E255058	CRG21-004	Core	19.4	10.7	-8.7	0.31	3.86
E255061	CRG21-004	Core	21.1	21.5	0.4	0.29	1.95
326229	CRG21-006	Core	21.8	22.3	0.5	17.95	49.60
E255081	CRG21-007	Core	5.9	6.1	0.2	0.80	5.13
E255084	CRG21-007	Core	6.6	7.0	0.5	0.38	17.80
E255087	CRG21-007	Core	9.0	9.5	0.6	0.41	5.48
E255088	CRG21-007	Core	9.5	10.2	0.7	0.37	4.21
E255089	CRG21-007	Core	10.2	10.5	0.3	0.41	3.65
E255097	CRG21-013	Core	32.6	32.8	0.2	0.41	7.51
E255099	CRG21-014	Core	29.0	30.5	1.5	0.37	2.50
E255100	CRG21-014	Core	30.5	32.2	1.7	0.22	9.30
E255105	CRG21-014	Core	55.4	55.8	0.4	0.25	3.49
E255114	CRG21-016	Core	18.3	18.4	0.1	0.30	1.81
E255115	CRG21-016	Core	18.4	18.7	0.3	0.60	4.51
E255130	CRG21-014a	Core	29.0	29.3	0.2	0.30	2.40
E255132	CRG21-014a	Core	29.6	30.1	0.5	2.33	14.40
E255133	CRG21-014a	Core	30.1	30.8	0.7	0.40	13.30
E255144	CRG21-017	Core	20.8	21.2	0.4	1.32	6.36
E255145	CRG21-017	Core	21.2	21.9	0.7	0.72	14.70
E255148	CRG21-017	Core	23.9	24.4	0.5	0.73	2.59
E255176	CRG21-025	Core	17.2	17.7	0.6	0.44	9.56
E255177	CRG21-025	Core	17.7	19.1	1.4	5.53	9.09
E255179	CRG21-025	Core	21.3	21.9	0.6	0.20	8.19
E255182	CRG21-025	Core	25.3	26.2	0.9	14.71	23.70
E255183	CRG21-025	Core	26.2	26.5	0.4	11.54	35.10
E255209	CRG21-026	Core	53.2	53.7	0.5	0.33	0.86
E255215	CRG21-026	Core	56.4	57.2	0.8	15.74	106.29
E255219	CRG21-026	Core	57.8	58.2	0.4	0.68	3.43
E255226	CRG21-027	Core	58.3	58.7	0.4	2.07	4.11
E255232	CRG21-027	Core	63.3	64.0	0.7	0.29	25.37
E255234	CRG21-027	Core	64.0	64.6	0.6	56.74	383.66
E255236	CRG21-027	Core	64.6	64.9	0.3	1.47	35.32
E255237	CRG21-027	Core	64.9	65.1	0.3	33.19	228.35
E255239	CRG21-027	Core	65.1	65.6	0.5	8.61	39.09

ASX Release 25 November 2021

2021 Drill-hole Co-ordinates

Hole ID	Easting	Northing	Elevation	Total Depth (m)
CRG21-001	2694042	1291581	9845	21
CRG21-002	2694042	1291581	9845	27.6
CRG21-003	2694042	1291581	9845	37.1
CRG21-004	2694042	1291581	9845	45.6
CRG21-005	2694042	1291581	9845	57.1
CRG21-006	2694042	1291581	9845	58.4
CRG21-007	2694042	1291581	9845	28.9
CRG21-008	2694042	1291581	9845	32.2
CRG21-009	2693929	1291307	9807	37.1
CRG21-010	2693929	1291307	9807	18
CRG21-013	2693929	1291307	9807	96.5
CRG21-014	2693929	1291307	9807	63.6
CRG21-014a	2693929	1291307	9807	41.7
CRG21-015	2693929	1291307	9807	48.6
CRG21-016	2693929	1291307	9807	58.7
CRG21-017	2693929	1291307	9807	49.9
CRG21-018	2693929	1291307	9807	48.3
CRG21-025	2694056	1291599	9845	121
CRG21-026	2693699	1291534	9710	70.7
CRG21-027	2693699	1291534	9710	72.8

ASX Release 25 November 2021

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut		• As of 9/30/2021, the Gold Links Project CRG Mining, LLC
techniques	channels, random chips, or specific		has completed 1,238 metres of drilling in 24 drill holes.
	specialised industry standard		All the drilling was done underground with diamond
	measurement tools appropriate to the		drill core. Industry standard core handling and
	minerals under investigation, such as		sampling procedures were employed to ensure high
	down hole gamma sondes, or handheld		quality samples.
	XRF instruments, etc). These examples		• Core sample boundaries were defined by changes in
	should not be taken as limiting the broad		lithology, alteration, and mineralization noted in
	meaning of sampling.		logging.
	• Include reference to measures taken to		• Potentially mineralized intervals were identified by
	ensure sample representivity and	the	geological logging and dispatched for assay with
	appropriate calibration of	any	minimum 0.3 metre shoulder samples.
	measurement tools or systems used.		• Logging geologist identified zones of interest for
	• Aspects of the determination of		sampling and sampled them. They also sampled a length
	mineralisation that are Material to the		equivalent to approximately 20% of the zone of interest
	Public Report.		on each side of it. These are referred to as shoulder
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work		samples.
	has been done this would be relatively		• Core remaining after sampling was stored in wax coated
	simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was		cardboard core trays.
	used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3		• Samples from drill holes were sent to ALSGlobal and
	kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g		Paragon Geochemical in Reno, Nevada for sample
	charge for fire assay’). In other cases more		preparation and assay. Samples were dried, weighed,
	explanation may be required, such as		crushed and split to obtain 250 gm. Samples were
	where there is coarse gold that has		placed in ring and puck grinder to produce 85% minus
	inherent sampling problems. Unusual		75 micron pulp. This material was blended on clean
	commodities or mineralisation types (eg		cloth and packaged in paper pulp bags. Using a pulp
	submarine nodules) may warrant		balance, a 30 gm sample was weighted out for
	disclosure of detailed information.		traditional fire assay. Samples were analyzed using
			standard fire assay for gold. Overlimits were analyzed
			via gravimetric analysis.
			• All samples followed a strict Chain of Custody.
			• Routine QAQC samples were inserted in the sample
			runs at a rate of 20%, comprising Certified Reference
			Materials from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd., and
			verified blank granitic material.
			• Sampling practice is appropriate to the geology and
			mineralization of the deposit and complies with
			industry best practice.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation,		• The drilling program utilizes underground core drilling.
techniques	open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,		• The core drilling is being conducted with a DE-130
	auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg		Sandvik rig with HQTT core tooling. Standard tubes
	core diameter, triple or standard tube,		were used for the first 6 drillholes, the rest utilized
	depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit		triple tube to increase recoveries. The drilling has been
	or other type, whether core is oriented		completed by an experienced diamond drilling core
	and if so, by what method, etc).		driller.
Drill sample	• Method of recording and assessing core		• All drilling recoveries have been logged and
recovery	and chip sample recoveries and results		notated each run based on 1.65-meter tooling.
	assessed.		• To maximize sample recoveries, use of triple tube
	• Measures taken to maximise		and long chain polymer muds were used to
	sample recovery and ensure		increase recovery.

ASX Release 25 November 2021

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	representative nature of the	• There has been no analysis between sample
	samples.	recoveries and grade to date.
	• Whether a relationship exists between
	sample recovery and grade and whether
	sample bias may have occurred due to
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
	material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have	• Core samples were geologically logged. Lithology, veining,
	been geologically and geotechnically	alteration, mineralization and weathering are recorded in
	logged to a level of detail to support	the appropriate tables of the drill hole database.
	appropriate Mineral Resource	• Each core box was photographed dry and wet, after
	estimation, mining studies and	logging of unit and structures were notated on the core.
	metallurgical studies.	• Core was cut along the long axis using a diamond saw,
	• Whether logging is qualitative or	half-core was sampled, and half stored for reference.
	quantitative in nature. Core (or	• Geological logging of core samples is qualitative
	costean, channel, etc) photography.	and quantitative in nature.
	• The total length and percentage of the
	relevant intersections logged.
Sub-sampling	• If core, whether cut or sawn and	• All drill core samples were cut along the long axis. The left
techniques and	whether quarter, half or all core taken.	side when looking down hole was sampled. Samples were
sample	• If non-core, whether riffled, tube	placed in a heavy-duty poly sample bag. Each core sample
preparation	sampled, rotary split, etc and	placed in heavy duty poly sample bag, noted interval
	whether sampled wet or dry.	width in sample book, with a sample tag with the
	• For all sample types, the nature,	corresponding sample number placed in the bag with the
	quality and appropriateness of the	other tag stapled to the top of the bag. Sample bags were
	sample preparation technique.	stapled along the top. Samples were sent by freight to
	• Quality control procedures adopted for	ALSGlobal or Paragon Geochemical, Reno, Nevada.
	all sub-sampling stages to maximise	• Routine QAQC samples were inserted at a 20% rate into
	representivity of samples.	the sample batches and comprised Certified Reference
	• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling	Materials (CRMs) from CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd.
	is representative of the in situ material	and verified blank granitic material.
	collected, including for instance results for	• Rock samples sent to ALS Laboratories were dried,
	field duplicate/second-half sampling.	weighed, crushed and split, with a split pulverized to
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the	better than 85% passing 75 microns. Samples were
	grain size of the material being sampled.	analyzed for trace elements using 4-acid digestion.
		Additionally, rocks samples were analyzed by standard
		30gm fire assay for gold and silver.
		• Sample size assessment was not conducted but used
		sampling size which is typical for gold deposits.
Quality of	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of	• Samples were assayed by industry standard methods
assay data	the assaying and laboratory procedures	by ALSGlobal Laboratories, Paragon Geochemical in
and	used and whether the technique is	Reno, Nevada and Hazen Research Laboratories in
laboratory	considered partial or total.	Golden, Colorado.
tests	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	• Fire assays for gold and silver were completed
	handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	using industry standard fire assay methodology.
	parameters used in determining the analysis	• External certified standards and blank material were
	including instrument make and model,	added to the sample submission.
	reading times, calibrations factors applied
	and their derivation, etc.
	• Nature of quality control procedures
	adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
	external laboratory checks) and whether
	acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
	and precision have been established.

ASX Release 25 November 2021

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Verification of	• The verification of significant	• Sampling, documentation and sample submittal were
sampling and	intersections by either independent or	under the guidance and care of Graham Craig, GIT
assaying	alternative company personnel.	(Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of
	• The use of twinned holes.	Manitoba).
	• Documentation of primary data,	• Drilling, sample, and assay data is currently stored in
	data entry procedures, data	MX Deposit, a secured data management system
	verification, data storage	through Seequent.
	(physical and electronic)
	protocols.
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate	• All drill hole collars are surveyed using differential GPS
data points	drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys),	survey equipment. The positions are accurate to within 10
	trenches, mine workings and other locations	cm x-y and height (z) to +/- 20 cm.
	used in Mineral Resource estimation.	• The holes are surveyed in the Colorado State Plane,
	• Specification of the grid system used.	UTM zone 12, NAD 1983 coordinate system.
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic	• Down hole surveys will be done using a Reflex SPRINT-
	control.	IQ north seeking gyro on all diamond drill holes. With
		collars surveyed using Reflex TN-14 Azimuth Aligner.
		• Sample locations were surveyed using Colorado State
		Plane, UTM zone 12, NAD 1983 coordinate system.
Data spacing	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration	• The spacing and location of data is currently 16-33
and	Results.	meter spacing according to previous Mineral Resource
distribution	• Whether the data spacing, and distribution	estimation completed.
	is sufficient to establish the degree of	• No sample compositing has been applied.
	geological and grade continuity appropriate
	for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
	estimation procedure(s) and classifications
	applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has been
	applied.
Orientation of	• Whether the orientation of sampling	• Drill holes are planned to be drilled obliquely to near
data in	achieves unbiased sampling of possible	perpendicular to the known mineralized structures.
relation to	structures and the extent to which this is	Definition of structure location is the principal goal.
geological	known, considering the deposit type.	• Sample orientation is deemed to be representative
structure	• If the relationship between the drilling	for reporting purposes.
	orientation and the orientation of key	• No bias is considered to have been introduced by
	mineralised structures is considered to	the existing sampling orientation.
	have introduced a sampling bias, this
	should be assessed and reported if
	material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	• All samples were taken and maintained under the
security	security.	constant care of CRG Mining personnel. Samples were
		delivered to laboratories by a licensed transportation
		company.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	• Drill hole sampling techniques and QAQC procedures
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	have been developed and reviewed by Dale Sketchley,
		M.Sc., P. Geo. of Acuity Geoscience Ltd., Graham
		Craig, GIT.
		• The QAQC program has demonstrated its ability to
		catch errors.
		• A QAQC review will be completed for this program.

ASX Release 25 November 2021

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number, location	• All tenements are 100% owned by Dateline
tenement and	and ownership including agreements or	Resources Limited or a wholly owned subsidiary and
land tenure	material issues with third parties such as	there exist production-based royalties as previously
status	joint ventures, partnerships, overriding	disclosed to ASX.
	royalties, native title interests, historical
	sites, wilderness or national park and
	environmental settings.
	• The security of the tenure held at the time
	of reporting along with any known
	impediments to obtaining a licence to
	operate in the area.
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration	• Historical work was completed by various groups over 100
done by other	by other parties.	years. Review of this work was completed by Dahrouge
parties		Geological Consulting Ltd. In 2019.
		• All previous work undertaken by others is non-JORC
		compliant.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of	• The Gold Links Project is hosted by an Early Proterozoic
	mineraliation.	assemblage of fine-grained meta-sediments and
		interbedded felsitic meta-volcanics. These were intruded
		by Early Proterozoic amphibolites, granites, and rhyolite
		porphyry dykes. Tertiary age rhyolitic stocks, dikes and
		sills intrude the Proterozoic rocks.
		• The gold and silver mineralization occurs in narrow
		fissure quartz veins. Veins in the district trend West-
		Northwest with steep Southerly dips.
		• The auriferous quartz veins cut through the
		various rock types. There appears to be an affinity
		for the veins with the amphibolites. The primary
		sulphide occurring in these veins is pyrite. Broad
		zones of silicification and disseminated sulfides
		have been found near the veins.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material to	• See Table 1 within this report for details of the drill
Information	the understanding of the exploration results	holes and sample locations.
	including a tabulation of the following
	information for all Material drill holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
	elevation above sea level in metres)
	of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is justified
	on the basis that the information is not
	Material and this exclusion does not detract
	from
	the understanding of the report, the
	Competent Person should clearly explain why
	this is the case.
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	• Drill hole intersections are reported above a lower
aggregation	averaging techniques, maximum and/or	exploration cut-off grade of 0.2 g/T Au and no
methods	minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of	upper cut off grade has been applied.

ASX Release 25 November 2021

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
	high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
	Material and should be stated.
	• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
	short lengths of high grade results and
	longer lengths of low grade results, the
	procedure used for such aggregation should
	be stated and some typical examples of such
	aggregations should be shown in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any reporting of
	metal equivalent values should be clearly
	stated.
Relationship	• These relationships are particularly		• Drill holes are orientated obliquely to the
between	important in the reporting of		mineralized structures and disseminated
mineralisation	Exploration Results.		bodies.
widths and	• If the geometry of the mineralisation		• Interception angles of the mineralized
intercept	with respect to the drill hole angle is		structures are estimated by geometries
lengths	known, its nature should be reported.		from known occurrences in the adjacent
	• If it is not known and only the down hole		mine workings and the core drilling
	lengths are reported, there should be a clear		intercepts.
	statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole
	length, true width not known’).
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with		• Supporting figures have been included within the body of
	scales) and tabulations of intercepts		this release.
	should be included for any significant
	discovery being
	reported These should include, but not be
	limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
	locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of all		• Representative reporting of both low and high grades
reporting	Exploration Results is not practicable,		and/or widths have been reported.
	representative reporting of both low and
	high grades and/or widths should be
	practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and
substantive	material, should be reported including (but
exploration	not limited to): geological observations;
data	geophysical survey results; geochemical
	survey results; bulk samples – size and method
	of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
	density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
	characteristics; potential deleterious or
	contaminating substances.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further		• At Gold Links, future work will include expanded drilling
	work (eg tests for lateral extensions or		the on-strike and down-dip extensions of the 2150,
	depth extensions or large-scale step-out		Hanging Wall, and 1700 veins, preparation for
	drilling).		underground exploitation, finalizing the surface
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of		program; reopening, mapping and sampling of
	possible extensions, including the main		previously inaccessible underground workings; as well as
	geological interpretations and future drilling		infill and expanded surface soil geochemistry, geological
	areas, provided this information is not		mapping, and geophysics.
	commercially sensitive.