DATELINE RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2019

Aug 13, 2019

==> picture [51 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

14 August 2019 Company Announcements Office Australian Securities Exchange Limited Exchange Centre 20 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000

Subject : Amended Announcement

On 13 August 2019 Dateline Resources Limited (“the Company” or “Dateline”) did release an exploration update at the Gold Links Project in Colorado, USA.

The Company did receive a request from the Australian Securities Exchange (‘ASX”) in relation to the report’s metal equivalent calculations contained in that exploration update.

To avoid any confusion, Dateline has issued an amended exploration update that retracts any metal equivalent calculations.

John Smith Company Secretary

Dateline Resources Limited (ACN 149 105 653) Level 29, 2 Chifley Square, Sydney, NSW 2000

www.datelineresources.com.au info@datelineresources.com.au

ASX Release 14 August 2019

Amended Exploration Update Gold Links Project, Colorado, USA

Highlights

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

• Extension of the high-grade Sacramento vein at the Gold Links Project confirmed

DATELINERESOURCES LIMITED

(ACN 149 105653) ASX Code:DTR

• New mineralised structure intersected east of the Sacramento vein

• 16 holes for 1,630 metres at Sacramento with 13 holes (81%) intersecting gold mineralisation

• Mineralisation intercepted over 225 metres of strike and 60 metres down dip and remains open in all directions

• High grade intercepts include:

CAPITALSTRUCTURE

Share Price (13/08/19) $0.004 Shares on issue 8,135million Market Cap $32.5million Unlisted Options 45 million

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

Southern Cross Exploration NL 32.5% Mr. Mark Johnson AO 19.6% National Nominees Ltd 15.4%

DIRECTORS & MANAGEMENT

Mark JohnsonAO Chairman Stephen Baghdadi ManagingDirector Greg Hall Non-Executive Director

John Smith Company Secretary

• 1.75m @ 24.9g/t Au and 153g/t Ag, including 0.5m @ 80.1g/t Au and 489g/t Ag from SAC13;

• 0.7m @ 18.1g/t Au and 241g/t Ag from SAC16;

• 0.5m @ 14g/t Au and 94.7g/t Ag from SAC06.

• Grab samples from a previously inaccessible area at Sacramento yielded results of up to 23.6g/t Au and 301g/t Ag

• Re-assaying of the 1977 C2 drill hole at Sacramento returned 0.7m @ 47.0g/t Au and confirmed the original C2 intercept of 0.7m @ 35.7g/t Au

• A further 225 metres of strike at Sacramento is yet to be tested, with follow-up drilling planned

• A 21 hole, 4,750m drilling program targeting the extension of the 2150 vein at the Gold Links mine has commenced where 2018 results at the 2150 vein included (see ASX DTR Announcement 21 February 2018):

• 1.9m @ 73.6g/t Au and 482g/t Ag from REY-111;

• 0.3m @ 205g/t Au and 1200g/t Ag from REY-93;

• 1.9m @ 26 g/t Au and 48g/t Ag from REY-14.

• Dateline is fully funded for continued drilling with over A$4.8m cash at bank as at 30 June 2019

Near-term News-flow

• Results from drilling the 2150 vein located at Gold Links North

CONTACT John Smith Phone: +61 2 9375 2353 Postal Address: P.O. Box 553 South Hurstville NSW 2221 Email: info@datelineresources.com.au

• Deeper Sacramento vein extension drilling

• Gold links field program

• Lucky Strike and Mineral Hill field program

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) is pleased to provide an update on the maiden surface drilling program which commenced on June 3, 2019 at the Northern section of the Gold Links project in Colorado, USA.

Managing Director, Mr Stephen Baghdadi commented:

“Phase 1 of this program has confirmed that the Sacramento vein continues below the old workings and identified a previously unknown and unmapped 65 metre altered structure that contains anomalous gold values.

Mineralisation was intercepted in most of the drill holes. Encouragingly, one of the deeper holes had the widest intersection and the highest gold and silver grades. Our confidence that other veins at Gold Links are likely to have similar deeper extensions has increased even further”

ASX Release 14 August 2019

Sacramento Vein Drilling – Gold Links North

The drill program was developed during winter and commenced on June 3, 2019. It was designed to test the down dip extension of the high-grade Sacramento vein. This objective has proven successful.

Sixteen (16) holes were drilled over a strike distance of 225 metres and a dip of 60 metres of which thirteen (13) holes intersected gold and silver mineralisation. Drilling has provided a more detailed understanding of the structural geology of the vein and has enabled Dateline to refine the 3D geological model for deeper drilling.

To date, 1,630 metres have been drilled at the Sacramento and a further 1,500 metres is being planned.

SAC13 hole

• 1.75 metres 24.9g/t Au and 153g/t Ag which includes a section of 0.5 metres of 80.1g/t Au. and 489g/t Ag.

• Located 60 metres below the old workings.

• Deeper drilling of this section is now a high priority.

SAC06 hole

• 0.5 metres of 14g/t Au and 94.7g/t Ag.

• Located 20 metres up dip and 38 metres NNE along strike from the intercept in SAC13 .

SAC16 hole

• 0.7m @ 18.1g/t Au and 241g/t Ag.

• 146 metres to the south of SAC06.

• This intercept is within 10m of the 1977 C2 hole that was recently re-assayed by Dateline and returned 0.7m @ 47.0g/t Au.

==> picture [547 x 232] intentionally omitted <==

The first surface drilling program in over 40 years has successfully demonstrated that the Sacramento vein is open in all directions

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [474 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

2 | ASX Release 14 August 2019

ASX Release 14 August 2019

New Target

A previously unmapped and unknown area to the east of the Sacramento vein was intersected by RC drilling. The altered zone is 65 metres wide and had several distinct zones of quartz veining, four of which contained anomalous gold values. Follow up drilling will be made to test the area adjacent to this intercept.

==> picture [551 x 257] intentionally omitted <==

Grab Samples

A previously inaccessible area of the Sacramento underground workings was opened up to allow very limited access to some broken material sitting in a shrink stope. Twenty kilograms of material was collected, samples were sent for assaying, two results have been received to date containing grades of,

• 23.6g/t Au and 301g/t Ag

• 16.8g/t Au and 118g/t Ag

Additional results are pending.

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [474 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

3 | ASX Release 14 August 2019

ASX Release 14 August 2019

2150 Vein Drilling

Drilling of the 2150 vein has commenced. The GL03 hole intersected a highly altered zone with pervasive sulphides. Samples from this section have been sent to the lab and assay results will be available in the coming weeks.

==> picture [539 x 393] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [271 x 197] intentionally omitted <==

Images of core from 2150 vein drill hole GL03

==> picture [247 x 198] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [474 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

4 | ASX Release 14 August 2019

==> picture [569 x 323] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Release 14 August 2019
Sacramento
Adit
Raymond
Reynolds Adit
Carter
Adit
Adit
Gold Links North Gold Links Centre Gold Links South
This image is intended as a guide only and is not a surveyed map of our true boundaries
----- End of picture text -----

Gold Links North includes	Gold Links Centre includes	Gold Links South includes
Sacramento Adit	Raymond Adit	Carter Adit
Sacramento vein	600 vein	100 vein
	950 vein	300 vein
Reynolds Adit	1100 vein	800 vein
1200 vein	1200 vein	1320 vein
1740 vein	1700 vein	1440 vein
2100 vein	1800 vein	1480 vein
2150 vein	1825 vein	1550 vein
2200 vein	2457 vein	1925 vein
2600 vein	3300 vein	2385 vein
2800 vein	Jessie vein	2500 vein
3300 vein	Gold Monument vein	2835 vein
	Maggie Mitchell vein	3040 vein
	Volunteer vein	3131 vein
	Upper Raymond vein	3640 vein
		3750 vein
Veins starting with digits represent number of feet from the start of the portal and were discovered and mapped from inside the adit		4085 vein
		4778 vein
		4868 vein
Veins that don't start with digits were discovered from surface outcrops		4883 vein
		6300 vein
		Farleyvein
Only the 2150 vein has been drilled below the valley floor		Grand Prize vein
		Volunteer vein
		Chloride vein

==> picture [474 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

5 | ASX Release 14 August 2019

ASX Release 14 August 2019

2019 Drill-hole Collar Coordinates

Hole ID	Easting	Northing	Elevation (feet)	Total Depth (feet)	Total Depth (metres)
SAC02	2695290	1292610	10186.1	363	119.1
SAC03	2695304	1292714	10193.8	335	109.9
SAC04	2695370	1292903	10187.9	322.5	105.8
SAC05	2695455	1293083	10201.1	370	121.4
SAC06	2695339	1292814	10189.2	326.5	107.1
SAC07	2695402	1292988	10190.8	330	108.3
SAC08	2695400	1292989	10191	445	146.0
SAC09	2695458	1293101	10200.8	559	183.4
SAC10	2695301	1292714	10196	54.5	17.9
SAC11	2695369	1292905	10185.4	450	147.6
SAC12	2695332	1292811	10191	358	117.5
SAC13	2695304	1292716	10194	353	115.8
SAC14	2695304	1292379	10133.4	385	126.3
SAC15	2695093	1292604	10083.2	500	164.0
SAC16	2695305	1292378	10134.1	142.5	46.8
GL02	2693993	1292571	9928.5	650	213.3
GL03	2694064	1292625	9974.4	800	262.5

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [474 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

6 | ASX Release 14 August 2019

ASX Release 14 August 2019

Drill-hole table

Sample_ID	Hole_ID	Drill Type	From (m)	To (m)	Length (m)	Au_ppm	Ag_ppm
P359414	SAC13	Core	96.7	97.1	0.5	80.1	489
P359415	SAC13	Core	97.1	97.6	0.5	9.8	61.6
P359416	SAC13	Core	97.6	98.4	0.8	2.06	14.7
P359430	SAC16	Core	31.5	32.2	0.7	18.1	241
P359431	SAC16	Core	40.6	41	0.4	0.377	16.8
P359317	SAC06	Core	90.4	90.9	0.5	14	94.7
P359318	SAC06	Core	90.9	91.4	0.5		11.5
P359319	SAC06	Core	91.4	91.9	0.5	1.71	21.3
P359425	SAC12	Core	101	101.6	0.6	2.16	49.1
P359426	SAC12	Core	101.6	101.9	0.3	8.12	268
P359341	SAC07	RC	88.6	90.2	1.6	0.549	6.79
P359342	SAC07	RC	90.2	91.9	1.6	4.08	47.2
P359390	SAC05	RC	86.9	88.6	1.6	0.377	11.1
P359355	SAC05	RC	101.7	103.3	1.6	0.651	8.66
P359330	SAC03	Core	92.8	93.1	0.3	0.343	10.6
P359331	SAC03	Core	93.1	93.8	0.7		3.12
P359335	SAC03	Core	95.1	95.4	0.3		19.4
P359338	SAC03	Core	97.7	98.1	0.5		4.03
P359323	SAC03	RC	34.4	36.1	1.6		4.33
P359252	SAC02	RC	78.7	80.4	1.6		5.03
P359253	SAC02	RC	80.4	82	1.6	0.343	23.4
P359284	SAC04	RC	68.9	70.5	1.6		3.84
P359274	SAC04	RC	70.5	72.2	1.6		4.29
P359277	SAC04	RC	77.1	78.7	1.6		46.9
P359286	SAC04	RC	78.7	80.4	1.6		4.12
P359288	SAC04	RC	82	83.7	1.6		3.9
P359278	SAC04	RC	83.7	85.3	1.6	0.514	35.4
P359280	SAC04	RC	85.3	86.9	1.6	0.309	10.1
P359346	SAC08	RC	109.9	111.5	1.6		3.63
P359501	SAC14	RC	18	19.7	1.6		3.63
P359502	SAC14	RC	19.7	21.3	1.6	0.309	5.43
P359386	SAC14	RC	32.8	34.4	1.6		3.18
P359516	SAC14	RC	103.3	105	1.6	0.309	4.58
P359401	SAC14	RC	111.5	113.2	1.6	0.274	4.19
P359407	SAC14	RC	119.8	121.4	1.6	0.309	5.35
P359409	SAC14	RC	123	124.7	1.6	0.309
P359432	SAC09	Core	81.2	81.7	0.5	0.309	5.54
P359433	SAC 11	RC	100	101.6	1.6	0.446	16.9
P359518	SAC15	RC	89.7	91.3	1.6	2.91	21.6
	SAC 01	Hole abandoned
	SAC 10	Hole abandoned

Grab and Channel sample table

Sample_ID	Location	Sample type	Au_ppm	Ag_ppm
P358966	Sacramento	Grab Sample	23.6	301
P358967	Sacramento	Grab Sample	16.8	118
P358963	Sacramento	Channel Sample	4.53	116
P358965	Sacramento	Channel Sample	2.19	26
P358964	Sacramento	Channel Sample	2.02	20.7

==> picture [73 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [474 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

7 | ASX Release 14 August 2019

ASX Release 14 August 2019

Competent Person’s Statement

Exploration information in this announcement is based upon work reviewed by Mr Gregory Hall who is a Chartered Professional of Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (CP-IMM) and undertaken by L.J. Karr an employee of CRG Mining LLC which is a 100% owned subsidiary of Dateline Resources. Mr Gregory Hall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a ‘Competent Person’ as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (JORC Code). Mr Gregory Hall is a nonexecutive Director of Dateline Resources Ltd and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

This Announcement is provided on the basis that neither the Company nor its representatives make any warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability, relevance or completeness of the material contained in the Announcement and nothing contained in the Announcement is, or may be relied upon as a promise, representation or warranty, whether as to the past or the future. The Company hereby excludes all warranties that can be excluded by law. The Announcement contains material which is predictive in nature and may be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known and unknown risks and uncertainties and may differ materially from results ultimately achieved.

The Announcement contains “forward-looking statements”. All statements other than those of historical facts included in the Announcement are forward-looking statements including estimates of Mineral Resources. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to, copper, gold and other metals price volatility, currency fluctuations, increased production costs and variances in ore grade recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans, as well as political and operational risks and governmental regulation and judicial outcomes. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to any “forward-looking statement” to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the Announcement, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. All persons should consider seeking appropriate professional advice in reviewing the Announcement and all other information with respect to the Company and evaluating the business, financial performance and operations of the Company. Neither the provision of the Announcement nor any information contained in the Announcement or subsequently communicated to any

For more information, please contact:

John Smith Chief Financial Officer +61 2 9375 2353 www.datelineresources.com.au

About Dateline Resources Limited

Dateline Resources Limited (ASX: DTR) is an Australian publicly listed company focused on gold exploration and development at its 100% owned Gold Links project which is in Gunnison County, Colorado, United States of America (Gold Links).

The Gold Links is comprised of several contiguous historic gold mines that have been consolidated by the company. Gold Links has produced in excess of 125,000 oz of high-grade gold (see ASX announcement of 8 February 2019)

Mineralisation can be traced on surface and underground for almost 6km from the northern to the southern sections of the project. Well documented records indicate that there are large areas that remain untested at surface and little to no exploration has been done below the valley floor.

Dateline acquired Gold Links because it believes there is a high probability of known mineralized structures continuing below the valley floor and the discovery of new veins, on this extensive brownfields mining property.

Dateline also owns the Lucky Strike and Mineral Hill permitted gold properties and has recommissioned a gold processing plant located at the Lucky Strike Mine. The Gold Links and the Lucky Strike are located approximately 50km apart

==> picture [74 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [474 x 4] intentionally omitted <==

8 | ASX Release 14 August 2019

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg	•CRG Mining, LLC undertook 1,630 metres
techniques	cut channels, random chips, or	of drilling in 16 drill holes. Of this 380 m
	specific specialised industry standard	were core and 1250 m were reverse
	measurement tools appropriate to the	circulation (RC). Three channel samples
	minerals under investigation, such as	and 3 grab samples were also collected.
	down hole gamma sondes, or	Industry standard core handling and
	handheld XRF instruments, etc).	sampling procedures were employed to
	These examples should not be taken	insure high quality samples.
	as limiting the broad meaning of	•Diamond core sampling was nominally at
	sampling.	1.5 m intervals. In zones of broken ground
	• Include reference to measures taken	and mineralisation sample intervals were
	to ensure sample representivity and	as short as 0.2 m.
	the appropriate calibration of any	•Potentially mineralized intervals of diamond
	measurement tools or systems used.	core were identified by geological logging
	• Aspects of the determination of	and were cut lengthways in half with one
	mineralisation that are Material to the	half retained as a reference sample, and
	Public Report.	the other dispatched for assay.
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’	•RC drilling obtained 1.5 m samples from
	work has been done this would be	which 7kg was split.
	relatively simple (eg ‘reverse	•Samples from drill holes and channel
	circulation drilling was used to obtain	samples were sent to Hazen Research,
	1 m samples from which 3 kg was	Golden, Colorado for sample preparation
	pulverised to produce a 30 g charge	and assay. Samples were dried, weighed,
	for fire assay’). In other cases more	crushed to -1mm and split to obtain 100gm.
	explanation may be required, such	Samples were placed in ring and puck
	as where there is coarse gold that	grinder to produce 90% minus 200 mesh
	has inherent sampling problems.	pulp. This material was blended on clean
	Unusual commodities or	cloth and packaged in paper pulp bags.
	mineralisation types (eg submarine	Using a pulp balance, a 29.17 gm sample
	nodules) may warrant disclosure of	was weighted out for traditional fire assay.
	detailed information.	Samples were analyzed using standard fire
		assay for gold and silver.
		•All samples followed a strict Chain of
		Custody.
		•Routine QAQC samples were inserted in
		the sample runs at a rate of 10%. The
		QAQC material was comprised of Certified
		Reference Materials from CDN Resource
		Laboratories Ltd. and blank material
		(barren granodiorite).
		•The sampling procedure is appropriate to
		the geology and mineralisation of the
		deposit and complies with industry best
		practices
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse	•The drilling program utilized both diamond
techniques	circulation, open-hole hammer,	coring and RC drilling.
	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,	•The diamond drilling was conducted using
	sonic, etc) and details (eg core	an LF90 track mounted diamond core rig
	diameter, triple or standard tube,	and an experience diamond driller. It
	depth of diamond tails, face-	employed wireline core barrels, bottom
	sampling bit or other type, whether	discharge bits, split inner tubes and HQ3
	core is oriented and if so, by what	size core (61.1mm).
	method, etc).	•The RC drilling was conducted with a track
		mounted Discovery 2 drill rig utilizing high
		pressure and high volume compressed air

Criteria JORC Code explanation

Commentary

and 101mm diameter face sampling percussion hammer. The drilling was completed by an experience RC driller.

Drill	• Method of recording and assessing	•Core was recovered using split inner tubes.
sample	core and chip sample recoveries and	Each core run was inspected and measured
recovery	results assessed.	for core recovery length and placed in wax
	• Measures taken to	coated cardboard core boxes for permanent
	maximise sample recovery	storage.
	and ensure representative	•Diamond core recovery was measured for
	nature of the samples.	each run and calculated as a percentage of
	• Whether a relationship exists	the drilled interval. In zones of mineralisation
	between sample recovery and grade	core recoveries were generally 95 to 100%.
	and whether sample bias may have	In fresh rock the core recovery was
	occurred due to preferential	generally 100%.
	loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	•Bottom discharge bits allow the water to
		bypass the core and minimizes erosion of
		soft materials. Split inner tubes enable
		enhanced core recovery in soft and/or highly
		fractured rock. Using this technology gave
		excellent core recovery and the ability to
		examine the core with no disturbance before
		the core was placed in a core box for
		permanent storage.
		•No quantitative analysis of sample weights,
		sample condition, recovery or repeatability
		has been undertaken.
		•There has been no assessment of core
		or RC sample recovery and grade.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples	•All core and RC samples were geologically
	have been geologically and	logged. Lithology, veining, alteration,
	geotechnically logged to a level	mineralisation and weathering are recorded
	of detail to support appropriate	in the appropriate tables of the drill hole
	Mineral Resource estimation,	database.
	mining studies and metallurgical	•Before logging the core, each box was
	studies.	photographed wet and dry. Geotechnical
	• Whether logging is qualitative or	logging for rock quality and RQD was
	quantitative in nature. Core (or	completed. The core was logged by the on-
	costean, channel, etc)	site geologist, and sample intervals selected.
	photography.	•Geological logging of core and RC samples
	• The total length and percentage of the	is descriptive in nature and both qualitative
	relevant intersections logged.	and quantitative depending on the features
		or parameters logged.
		•Geotechnical logging of core is quantitative
		and includes RQD measurements and
		measuring of structures such as faults and
		foliation.
Sub-	• If core, whether cut or sawn and	•Intervals to be sampled were identified by
sampling	whether quarter, half or all core	the company geologist while logging the
techniques	taken.	core. Sample intervals were marked with
and sample	• If non-core, whether riffled,	permanent marker in the core boxes and
preparation	tube sampled, rotary split, etc	sample number tags stapled in each interval.
	and whether sampled wet or	Samples are placed in a heavy duty cloth
	dry.	sample bag. Each sample bag was marked
	• For all sample types, the	with permanent marker with sample number,
	nature, quality and	a sample tag stapled to the bag, and a
	appropriateness of the sample	sample tag with the corresponding sample
	preparation technique.	number placed in the bag. Sample bags
	• Quality control procedures	were sealed with draw strings. Samples

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	adopted for all sub-sampling	were sent by United Parcel Service (UPS) or
	stages to maximise representivity	hand delivered by CRG Mining personnel to
	of samples.	Hazen Research.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the	•Core was cut in half, and one half retained
	sampling is representative of the in situ	and the other sent for assay.
	material collected, including for	•RC samples were sub sampled using a rig
	instance results for field	mounted rotary splitter to produce a split
	duplicate/second-half sampling.	sample of approximately 7 kg in weight.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	•The splitter was routinely cleaned at the end of sampling stages to minimize contamination of each drill rod (1.5 m) or as
		needed.
		•Sample size assessment was not conducted
		but the sampling size used is typical for gold
		deposits.
Quality of	• The nature, quality and	•All samples were assayed by industry
assay	appropriateness of the assaying and	standard methods by Hazen Research.
data and	laboratory procedures used and	•Fire assays for gold and silver
laboratory	whether the technique is considered	were completed using industry
tests	partial or total.	standard fire assay methodology.
	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	•External certified standards and blank
	handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	material were added to the sample
	parameters used in determining the	submission. Acceptable levels of
	analysis including instrument make	accuracy and precision were found.
	and model, reading times, calibrations	•Hazen included an internal blank and
	factors applied and their derivation, etc.	duplicate within each batch.
	• Nature of quality control procedures
	adopted (eg standards, blanks,
	duplicates, external laboratory checks)
	and whether acceptable levels of
	accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision
	have been established.
Verification	• The verification of significant	•Sampling, documentation and sample
of sampling	intersections by either independent	submittal were under the guidance and care
and assaying	or alternative company personnel.	of Leonard J. Karr, certified professional
	• The use of twinned holes.	geologist, CPG #11072 (American Institute of
	• Documentation of primary	Professional Geologists), Project Geologist.
	data, data entry procedures,	•Intersection assays were documented by
	data verification, data storage	CRG's professional exploration geologists and
	(physical and electronic)	verified by CRG's Project Geologist.
	protocols.	•All assay data were received as CSV files,
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	checked, verified and merged into CRG’s
		database.
		•Original laboratory data files in CSV and
		locked PDF formats are stored together with
		the merged data.
		•No drill holes were twinned
		•No verification of sampling and assaying has
		been undertaken.
		•No assay adjustment was applied.
Location	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to	•All drill hole collars were surveyed by a
of data	locate drill holes (collar and down-hole	licensed surveyor using differential GPS
points	surveys), trenches, mine workings and	survey equipment. The positions are
	other locations used in Mineral	accurate to within 10 cm x-y and height (z)
	Resource estimation.	to +/- 20 cm.
	• Specification of the grid system used.	•The holes are surveyed in the Colorado
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic	State Plane, Central Zone, coordinate
	control.	system.
		•Down hole surveys using a Reflex

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		EZ_TRAC were done on all diamond
		drill holes. Surveys were completed
		for seven of the fifteen holes.
Data spacing	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration	•The spacing and location of data is currently
and	Results.	only being considered for exploration and
distribution	• Whether the data spacing and	resource estimation purposes.
	distribution is sufficient to establish the	•Drill hole data is currently being evaluated
	degree of geological and grade	for its appropriateness in estimating a
	continuity appropriate for the Mineral	mineral resource.
	Resource and Ore Reserve estimation	•No sample compositing has been applied.
	procedure(s) and classifications
	applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has been
	applied.
Orientation of	• Whether the orientation of sampling	•Drill holes are planned to drill perpendicular
data in	achieves unbiased sampling of	or near perpendicular to the known
relation to	possible structures and the extent to	mineralized structures. This gives a good
geological	which this is known, considering the	approximation of vein thickness and
structure	deposit type.	unbiased sampling.
	• If the relationship between the drilling	•Sample orientation is deemed to be
	orientation and the orientation of key	representative for reporting purposes.
	mineralised structures is considered	•No bias is considered to have been
	to have introduced a sampling bias,	introduced by the existing sampling
	this should be assessed and reported	orientation
	if material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample	•All samples were taken and maintained
security	security.	under the constant care of CRG Mining
		personnel. Samples were either
		delivered by UPS or personally by CRG
		employees.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	•Sampling techniques have been developed
reviews	sampling techniques and data.	by Dale Sketchley, M.Sc.,
		P. Geo. of Acuity Geoscience Ltd.
		•No audits or reviews completed.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number,	•All tenements are 100% owned by
tenement and	location and ownership including	Dateline Resources Limited or a
land tenure	agreements or material issues with	wholly owned subsidiary and there
status	third parties such as joint ventures,	exists production based royalties as
	partnerships, overriding royalties,	previously disclosed to ASX
	native title interests, historical sites,
	wilderness or national park and
	environmental settings.
	• The security of the tenure held at the
	time of reporting along with any
	known impediments to obtaining a
	licence to operate in the area.
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	•Historical data was completed by
done by other	exploration by other parties.	several parties over 100 years.
parties		•All previous work undertaken by is non-
		JORC compliant

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and	•The Gold Links Project is hosted by an Early
	style of mineralisation.	Proterozoic assemblage of fine-grained
		meta-sediments and interbedded meta-
		volcanics. These were intruded by Early
		Proterozoic granite, pegmatite and gabbro.
		Tertiary age rhyolitic stocks, dikes and sills
		intrude the Proterozoic rocks.
		•The gold and silver mineralization
		occurs in fissure quartz veins. Veins
		in the district trend north northeast.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material
Information	to the understanding of the	•See Table 1 within this report for details
	exploration results including a	of the drill holes and sample locations
	tabulation of the following information
	for all Material drill holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole
	collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level
	– elevation above sea level in
	metres) of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception
	depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the
	information is not Material and this
	exclusion does not detract from
	the understanding of the report, the
	Competent Person should clearly
	explain why this is the case.
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results,	•Drill hole intersections are reported above a
aggregation	weighting averaging techniques,	lower cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t Au and no
methods	maximum and/or minimum grade	upper cut-off grade has been applied. A
	truncations (eg cutting of high grades)	minimum intercept 0.2 m applies to the drill
	and cut-off grades are usually Material	core, and 1.5 m applies to the RC sampling
	and should be stated.	in the tabulated results presented in the
	• Where aggregate intercepts	main body of this release.
	incorporate short lengths of high
	grade results and longer lengths of
	low grade results, the procedure used
	for such aggregation should be stated
	and some typical examples of such
	aggregations should be shown in
	detail.
	• The assumptions used for any
	reporting of metal equivalent values
	should be clearly stated.
Relationship	• These relationships are	•Drill holes are orientated to drill
between	particularly important in the	perpendicular or near to perpendicular to the
mineralisation	reporting of Exploration Results.	mineralized structures.
widths and	• If the geometry of the
intercept	mineralisation with respect to the
lengths	drill hole angle is known, its
	nature should be reported.
	• If it is not known and only the down
	hole lengths are reported, there should
	be a clear statement to this effect (eg
	‘down hole length, true width not
	known’).

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections	•Supporting figures have been included
	(with scales) and tabulations of	within the body of this release.
	intercepts should be included for
	any significant discovery being
	reported These should include, but
	not be limited to a plan view of drill
	hole collar locations and appropriate
	sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of	•All results have been reported.
reporting	all Exploration Results is not
	practicable, representative reporting
	of both low and high grades and/or
	widths should be practiced to avoid
	misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful
substantive	and material, should be reported
exploration	including (but not limited to): geological
data	observations; geophysical survey
	results; geochemical survey results;
	bulk samples – size and method of
	treatment; metallurgical test results;
	bulk density,
	groundwater, geotechnical and
	rock characteristics; potential
	deleterious or contaminating
	substances.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned	•Future will include drilling the on-strike and
	further work (eg tests for lateral	down-dip extensions of the Sacramento
	extensions or depth extensions or	Vein, reopening, mapping and sampling of
	large-scale step-out drilling).	previously inaccessible underground
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas	workings, surface trenching and surface
	of possible extensions, including the	mapping and sampling. Both surface and
	main geological interpretations and	downhole geophysical surveys are under
	future drilling areas, provided this	evaluation.
	information is not commercially
	sensitive.