Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

CULLEN RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2024

Jan 7, 2024

64724_rns_2024-01-07_00560e84-ce38-4b2c-8617-7473b46320a7.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [485 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

ASX Announcement

8 January 2024

ASX: CUL

Rock chip assay results - three projects

SUMMARY

  • Assays have been received for a set of reconnaissance surface samples (rock chips and laterite – 35) from the Barlee, Bromus and Mukinbudin Projects – (Figs.1 - 4, and Tables 1 - 2).

  • Results confirm Trainers Rock as a lithium-in-pegmatites target (Li to 1760ppm) , and also underlines gold prospective, granite-greenstone terrane in the south at Barlee , previously mapped as granite.

  • Assays of fresh granite from Mukinbudin indicate a good potential source for clay-hosted Rare Earth Elements (REE) mineralisation in any associated regolith, with Nd+Pr assays of 169 and 188ppm in two samples.

  • At Bromus, results from reconnaissance air core drilling (49 holes for 1674m) in November are expected this month. Assays for six samples of pegmatite were received but do not explain local lithium-in-soil anomalies with further prospecting of these targets planned.

BARLEE PROJECT, E57/1135, E’s 77/2606, 2967, 2782, 2688, and ELA 3118 - c entered ~40km south of the Penny Gold Mine (Cullen 100%).

  • Rock chip sample assays (231456-231461) from the Trainers Rock prospect, have confirmed prospectivity for LCT – type pegmatites with Li values to 1760ppm; Nb to 361ppm, Ta to 56ppm, and Sn to 210ppm .

  • Rock chip samples assays (231448-231455) confirm the presence of mafic rocks, with elevated Cr (to 1820ppm); Cu (to 314ppm) and Ni (to 810ppm), within a prospective, mixed granite-greenstone terrane in the southern part of the project area (E2606). This area includes quartz veins and pegmatites (E-W and NE-SW), and soil anomalies of Au, Ag, Ni, Cu, and Co interpreted to overlie a mafic-ultramafic horizon (E77/2606, ASX:CUL; 8-11-2023)

  • Sample 231463 (E2606) returned Li of 136ppm, with 141ppm Nb and 112ppm Sn in a NE trending pegmatite (a strong aerial photo feature).

Exploration Update – January 2024

  • Rock chip samples 231441-231443 from a soil-covered lithium target area in NW sector of E57/1135, did not return any anomalies in lithium, tantalum or caesium although re-assayed soil sample pulps in this area included elevated and anomalous rare element assays (ASX: CUL:8-10-2023).

==> picture [453 x 640] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Samples : 231441- 443
E1135
Samples : 231444 -
455; 462-464 E2606
Samples :
231456 – 461
E2967, 2688
----- End of picture text -----

Fig 1 . Location of surface samples, November reconnaissance program.

2

Exploration Update – January 2024

==> picture [469 x 333] intentionally omitted <==

Fig. 2. Northern section of Cullen’s Barlee Project: Trainers Rock target defined by UF soil and rock chip anomalies (ASX:CUL; 31-8-2023). Rock chips to 4.6% Li2O, reported by Venus Metals Corp. (ASX:VMC; 18-9-2023) to the west of E1135.

Three rock chip samples (231441-231444) from within this NW soil-covered target area of E57/1135 did not return any significant anomlies associated with LCT-type pegmatites. However, rock chip samples assays (231456-231461) from the Trainers Rocks prospect support this as a LCT pegmatite target area.

(Note: Fig.2 , yellow triangles are previously-reported Cullen rock chip samples – ASX:CUL; 3-2-2023).

3

Exploration Update – January 2024

BROMUS SOUTH PROJECT, W.A., E63/1894 , 2216 (Cullen 100%) - centered ~30km south west of Norseman, gold and lithium exploration.

Cullen completed reconnaissance air core drilling ( 49 holes for 1674m) in November, with composite sample assays expected this month. During this drilling, pegmatite outcrop and float were sampled (231850-855) on the eastern margin of a granite ( Fig.3) - an area marked by soil anomalies of 134 and 107ppm Li (ASX: CUL; 23-1-2023). The rock chip assays (Tables 1 and 2) do not explain the local lithium-in-soil anomalies, with further prospecting of these targets within E2216 planned.

==> picture [357 x 466] intentionally omitted <==

Fig. 3 : Summary of air core drilling and rock chip sampling completed , November 2023. Target boxes defined by air mag: -red; 2-orange; 3-green in priority from high to low.

References:

BAXTER, C., 2014: Annual Report for EL63/1368 Bromus South for the Period 3 August 2013 to 2 August 2014 (WAMEX report – A103452)

CRYAN, G., 2015: Final Surrender Report for EL63/1368 Bromus South Project for the period 3 August 2010 to 2 August 2015 (WAMEX report – A107016)

4

Exploration Update – January 2024

MUKINBUDIN ROJECT, W.A., E70/6138, ELA 77/3112 (Cullen 100%) - centered ~12km south east of Mukinbudin.

To date, Cullen has completed a reconnaissance field visit and reviewed some historical exploration data for this new project, considered prospective for clayhosted rare earth elements, lode gold and lithium-in-pegmatites. The project terrain is mainly farmed and outcropping bedrock is generally lacking. However, assays for rock samples (1221486-1221490), Tables 1and 2, indicate elevated Nd and Pr assays (~170-190 ppm combined) in fresh granites, a potential source rock for clay-hosted rare earth element mineralisation in the project area. A private access agreement has not yet been negotiated.

==> picture [491 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Mukinbudin
Cullen
E6138
N
E3112
IGO
~10km
----- End of picture text -----

Fig. 4: Location of Cullen’s Mukinbudin Project tenure which lies within a substantial tenement holding of IGO Newsearch Pty Ltd.

References:

( WAMEX: A99174); Mukinbudin Project Combined Annual Report for Exploration Licences E70/2920, E70/2986, E70/3661, E70/3662, E70/3887, E70/4062, E77/1336, E77/1337, E77/1405, E77/1709, E77/1710 and E77/1918 for the period 1st July 2012 to 30th June 2013 ReportDate 2013; FEY P; MINDAX ENERGY PTY LTD.

(WAMEX123852) ; E70/4992 & E77/2463 Partial Surrender Report for the period ending

21/01/2020.CHERY J;CYGNUS GOLD LTD

==> picture [472 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

5

Exploration Update – January 2024

Table 1 : Location and description of surface samples from November reconnaissance programs

ID Easting Northing Project Prospect Tenement Position
1221486 629189 6566806 Mukinbudin North East E 70/6138 FLOAT?
1221487 628959 6566885 Mukinbudin North East E 70/6138 FLOAT? - IN-SITU
1221488 628941 6566900 Mukinbudin North East E 70/6138 FLOAT? - IN-SITU
1221489 628920 6566905 Mukinbudin North East E 70/6138 FLOAT
1221490 628917 6566902 Mukinbudin North East E 70/6138 FLOAT
231441 681990 6793393 Lake Barlee North-East E 57/1135 FLOAT
231442 681920 6793336 Lake Barlee North-East E 57/1135 IN-SITU
231443 681976 6792594 Lake Barlee North-East E 57/1135 FLOAT
231444 689799 6758401 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231445 690834 6757534 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231446 691196 6757951 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 FLOAT?
231447 690850 6757529 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231448 690266 6759101 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231449 690374 6759134 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231450 691341 6760585 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 FLOAT
231451 691362 6760694 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231452 691353 6760827 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231453 691304 6761200 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231454 691209 6761419 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231455 691201 6762412 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 FLOAT
231456 698155 6781062 Lake Barlee North Trainers E 77/2967 IN-SITU
231457 698039 6780889 Lake Barlee North Trainers E 77/2967 IN-SITU
231458 697611 6775615 Lake Barlee Trainer's Rock E 77/2688 IN-SITU
231459 697611 6775615 Lake Barlee Trainer's Rock E 77/2688 IN-SITU
231460 697618 6775634 Lake Barlee Trainer's Rock E 77/2688 IN-SITU
231461 697597 6775702 Lake Barlee Trainer's Rock E 77/2688 IN-SITU
231462 691050 6757340 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 FLOAT/IN-SITU
231463 691195 6757434 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231464 692373 6757784 Lake Barlee South Central E 77/2606 IN-SITU
231850 378803 6416770 Bromus South Dundas Line E 63/2216 IN-SITU
231851 378803 6416770 Bromus South Dundas Line E 63/2216 IN-SITU
231852 378805 6416768 Bromus South Dundas Line E 63/2216 IN-SITU
231853 378811 6416790 Bromus South Dundas Line E 63/2216 IN-SITU
231854 378775 6417059 Bromus South Dundas Line E 63/2216 IN-SITU
231855 378859 6416926 Bromus South Dundas Line E 63/2216 IN-SITU

6

Exploration Update – January 2024

Table 2 : Assay results for surface samples from November reconnaissance programs. (“BD” = Below detection of 1ppb Au)

==> picture [355 x 675] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

231855 231854 231853 231852 231851 231850 Bromus 231464 231463 231462 231461 231460 231459 231458 231457 231456 231455 231454 231453 231452 231451 231450 231449 231448 231447 231446 231445 231444 231443 231442 231441 Barlee 1221490 1221489 1221488 1221487 1221486 Mukinbudin
ppb 1 1 2 1 BD 3 Au 1 1 1 BD 1 1 1 2 1 1 BD BD BD BD BD BD BD BD BD BD 8 BD 1 BD Au BD BD BD 1 BD Au
ppm <0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 gA 0.09 0.15 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.03 gA 0.01 0.14 0.02 0.02 0.07 gA
ppm 0.9 3.6 1.1 54.7 0.8 2.4 As 1.3 0.5 1.4 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.7 1 0.5 1.5 1 2.1 1 0.5 0.3 2 <0.2 3.7 0.5 0.5 <0.2 As 0.9 0.5 0.4 1.1 0.7 As
ppm 0.73 1.58 0.29 1.6 0.56 1.22 Be 4.09 3.27 0.79 5.91 3.26 12.75 5.12 6.77 4.74 13.8 1.72 0.65 3.95 1.46 1.39 1.1 0.43 1.44 1.84 1.11 0.58 <0.05 0.65 0.17 Be 0.81 1.83 0.27 0.68 1.58 Be
ppm 9.89 2.99 2.49 36 2.16 10.25 Ce 3.21 2.05 13.8 1.86 20.8 2.78 33.9 12.85 10.95 2.76 11.5 33.7 8.81 8.95 6.64 48.4 16.9 4.12 4.57 4.89 33 1.42 16.75 4.79 Ce 3.52 423 3.18 20.2 374 Ce
ppm 0.4 0.2 0.5 5.5 0.1 0.3 Co 1.5 1.2 4.5 0.3 3.4 1 0.4 2.8 0.5 18.7 29.3 118 108 50.5 11.3 68 64.2 1.5 1.2 0.6 9.8 0.3 4 0.4 Co 0.3 1.3 0.4 0.5 0.9 Co
ppm 4 3 6 143 3 7 Cr 22 13 70 4 4 2 3 16 11 725 187 1770 193 997 766 622 1820 16 39 16 30 7 45 8 Cr 5 10 14 6 8 Cr
ppm 5.24 7.47 3.17 5.66 1.55 0.79 Cs 25.7 2.92 0.08 12 9.22 25.8 6.69 11.5 8.77 0.28 3.51 0.35 5.07 1.06 0.2 0.24 0.35 1.48 5.42 0.91 1.12 0.1 4 2.72 Cs 4.51 0.93 0.1 2.27 1.18 Cs
ppm 3.2 4.2 4.5 21.8 4.3 6.7 Cu 15.8 5.2 58.3 5.2 12.2 8.2 13.8 16.2 5.9 9.9 22.3 17.8 314 17 280 42.5 59.3 5.2 43.6 4.1 23.5 3.5 30 5.8 Cu 4.6 16.9 3.9 8.2 5.6 Cu
% 6.7 5.91 6.91 1.92 8.11 2.74 K 1.87 2.14 0.02 3.84 3.67 7.7 2.75 3.87 1.95 0.03 0.22 0.08 0.34 0.92 0.19 0.51 0.09 0.86 7.41 0.64 0.23 0.04 1.15 9.75 K 9.1 4.1 0.19 6.12 4.35 K
ppm 5.1 1.8 2.2 18 1.5 3.7 La 2.3 0.9 8.5 1 7.2 0.7 13.7 9 5.2 2 5.1 4.3 4.4 15.3 2.8 28.7 12.7 3.7 3.6 2.5 12.2 0.9 16.3 3 La 2 224 1.6 9.5 191.5 La
ppm 1.4 3.3 2.4 21.7 1.2 2.8 Li 122 136 4.3 537 138.5 1760 329 742 34.1 2.6 8.4 16 15.2 15.3 2.2 2.8 9.9 46.5 1.4 37.2 10.2 1.4 5.1 0.7 Li 1.5 0.8 34.5 3.1 1.4 Li
% 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.61 0.01 0.04 gM 0.05 0.13 0.02 0.09 0.03 0.24 0.05 0.56 0.04 0.47 3.09 10.75 0.14 4.72 0.08 5.42 13.4 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.42 <0.01 0.08 0.01 gM 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.03 gM
% 1.7 1.9 1.26 2.09 1.71 1.99 Na 0.11 0.14 0.01 0.8 2.88 0.71 2.72 0.18 3.14 0.02 2.39 0.2 0.06 1.24 0.04 0.83 0.16 0.08 0.66 0.14 0.07 0.01 0.06 1 Na 1.97 0.11 0.02 1.41 0.13 Na
ppm 1.4 5.1 0.7 7.2 0.7 1.7 Nb 105 141.5 1.5 129 82.2 361 82.4 216 16 0.7 2.8 0.9 20.4 2.5 0.7 8.3 1.1 96.3 20.7 44.7 3.6 0.5 3.7 0.5 Nb 0.5 25.2 0.6 1 24.9 Nb
ppm 1 0.8 2.2 15.4 0.6 1 Ni 7.8 4.9 14.1 1 2.1 1 1.3 10.6 2.9 317 85.5 810 410 467 116 289 633 10.1 7.2 4.2 25.7 1.5 61.9 4.8 Ni 1 2 1.3 1.3 1.3 Ni
ppm 72.6 70.6 70.7 36.4 84.8 28.6 Pb 7.1 2 64.8 4.7 14.2 4.1 17.2 13.4 19 2.8 10.6 3 26.5 17.4 42.9 45.1 4.2 8.2 57.3 3.9 7.6 1.5 22.8 77.9 Pb 57.8 49.8 1.3 41.2 73.9 Pb
ppm 362 408 347 256 277 142 Rb 759 692 3.4 1085 772 1440 667 923 298 3.2 11.2 9.3 120.5 89.9 8.7 20.1 10.2 269 1200 157 20.6 1.8 35.2 270 Rb 381 195 15.6 277 197 Rb
ppm 0.4 0.4 0.3 10.5 0.3 2.3 Sc 12.2 31.7 30.9 12.5 3.2 34.1 20 21.9 3.9 6.6 24.2 27.1 65.7 13.4 13.6 32.3 22.6 11.3 15.1 18.7 5.2 0.2 4.6 0.4 Sc 0.2 7.4 0.1 0.3 6.8 Sc
ppm 0.9 2.1 0.6 1.4 0.5 0.5 Sn 50.9 112 1 27.2 13 210 33.1 121 2.4 0.3 0.9 0.5 10.8 0.6 0.6 1.3 1.2 53.2 1.8 32.3 1.1 <0.2 0.7 <0.2 Sn 0.2 2.8 <0.2 0.3 5.2 Sn
ppm 0.33 5.16 0.13 0.73 0.06 0.26 Ta 11.6 7.93 0.17 9.24 9.31 56.3 5.52 11.65 2.62 0.12 0.24 0.07 1.88 0.37 0.08 0.63 0.19 9.74 4.17 3.67 0.4 <0.05 0.33 0.05 Ta 0.09 1.22 <0.05 0.27 1.56 Ta
ppm 2 3 4 153 2 5 V 15 6 319 1 2 8 1 16 3 32 169 115 438 76 154 269 155 10 46 4 31 2 30 2 V 1 27 2 2 21 V
ppm 0.2 0.3 0.2 1.1 0.1 0.3 W 5.7 4.4 0.3 4 1.2 15 2.9 4.5 0.3 2.4 20.2 0.3 20.1 1.1 10.2 0.9 0.2 3.1 0.8 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.1 W 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.4 6.3 W
ppm 3.5 2.2 1 8.8 0.5 9.5 Y 1.9 1.6 3 7.3 12.8 5.9 9.3 3.1 9.3 3 10 7.4 12.7 58.3 3.6 20.9 7.8 2 1.3 2.4 10.4 0.3 6 1 Y 3.1 53 1.1 4 54 Y
ppm 2 <2 2 55 <2 2 Zn 38 24 31 127 56 245 41 111 20 33 75 119 56 76 49 186 72 10 3 8 15 3 27 3 Zn 2 9 6 4 8 Zn
ppm 18.4 17.4 6.5 107 3.2 167 Zr 37.4 8.4 8.9 8 28.1 20 7.6 13.8 24.6 4 38.2 10.9 48.6 27.3 5.4 18.4 11.4 20.7 12.8 11 34 3.7 102.5 7.4 Zr 4.2 313 4.6 12 357 Zr
gGranite Pe gGranite Pe gPematite Mafic Schist gmatitePe g Granite Pe gyLitholo gGranite Pe gPematite Gneiss Schist pliteA ()Mica PEG gPematite gPematite gGranite Pe Laterite Mafic Schist Mafic Schist Granite Mafic Schist Mafic Schist Mafic Schist Mafic Schist gPematite Granite gPematite Granite Quartz Granite gGranite Pe gyLitholo gPematite Coarse Granite QZoned uartz Coarse Granite Coarse Granite gyLitholo
matite matite matite matite matite matite
E2216 E2216 E2216 E2216 E2216 E2216 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2688 E2688 E2688 E2688 E2967 E2967 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E2606 E1135 E1135 E1135 E6138 E6138 E6138 E6138 E6138
Tenement Tenement Tenement
----- End of picture text -----

7

Exploration Update – January 2024

Table 2 : Assay results for surface samples from November reconnaissance programs (contd.)

==> picture [468 x 420] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Mukinbudin Dy Er Eu Gd Ho Lu Nd Pr Sm Tb Tm Yb Lithology
1221486 11.6 5.83 2.16 13.35 2.03 0.7 129.5 39.5 19.35 1.96 0.8 5.11 Coarse Granite
1221487 0.78 0.43 0.63 0.83 0.15 0.07 5.6 1.6 1.04 0.13 0.06 0.48 Coarse Granite
1221488 0.14 0.09 0.03 0.15 0.03 0.01 1.1 0.32 0.17 0.02 0.01 0.09 Zoned Quartz
1221489 11 5.25 2.29 13.3 1.93 0.66 145.5 43 20.1 1.9 0.75 4.9 Coarse Granite
1221490 0.49 0.35 0.49 0.42 0.11 0.06 1.8 0.42 0.38 0.07 0.06 0.36 Pegmatite
Barlee
231441 0.19 0.1 0.25 0.24 0.03 0.02 1.7 0.52 0.31 0.04 0.02 0.11 Granite Pegmatite
231442 1.25 0.8 0.27 1.08 0.25 0.17 5.9 1.77 1.2 0.16 0.14 1.12 Granite
231443 0.06 0.04 <0.03 0.06 0.01 <0.01 0.5 0.15 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.03 Quartz
231444 1.82 1.12 0.44 1.86 0.35 0.16 11.3 2.84 2.12 0.27 0.16 1.09 Granite
231445 0.35 0.24 0.03 0.32 0.07 0.04 1.8 0.51 0.35 0.06 0.04 0.25 Pegmatite
231446 0.4 0.2 0.07 0.3 0.07 0.04 1.6 0.46 0.36 0.06 0.04 0.3 Granite
231447 0.35 0.18 <0.03 0.25 0.06 0.05 1.1 0.34 0.2 0.05 0.04 0.31 Pegmatite
231448 1.44 0.84 0.26 1.29 0.29 0.14 8.8 2.45 1.49 0.2 0.13 0.92 Mafic Schist
231449 3.93 1.93 1.46 4.51 0.72 0.21 24.3 5.88 5.27 0.66 0.25 1.62 Mafic Schist
231450 0.83 0.52 0.26 0.71 0.16 0.09 2.8 0.66 0.69 0.12 0.08 0.61 Mafic Schist
231451 5.5 3.88 0.59 4.52 1.22 0.45 9.3 2.29 2.5 0.75 0.48 2.93 Mafic Schist
231452 3.64 2.41 0.6 2.56 0.71 0.48 6.8 1.53 2.38 0.5 0.39 3.42 Granite
231453 1.33 0.89 0.2 0.91 0.28 0.13 3.4 0.85 0.74 0.18 0.13 0.93 Mafic Schist
231454 1.89 1.17 0.57 1.79 0.38 0.17 7 1.62 1.7 0.28 0.17 1.22 Mafic Schist
231455 0.58 0.35 0.11 0.51 0.11 0.06 1.8 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.06 0.45 Laterite
231456 1.46 1.02 0.09 1.36 0.3 0.18 5.6 1.44 1.57 0.22 0.16 1.42 Granite Pegmatite
231457 0.75 0.38 0.21 0.84 0.12 0.06 6.9 1.96 1.35 0.12 0.05 0.37 Pegmatite
231458 2.01 0.86 0.09 2.73 0.29 0.14 15.6 4.08 4.3 0.38 0.12 0.97 Pegmatite
231459 0.97 0.56 0.03 0.62 0.18 0.14 1 0.27 0.46 0.14 0.1 0.93 Mica (PEG)
231460 2.31 1.21 0.08 1.52 0.38 0.22 5.4 1.6 1.76 0.33 0.19 1.77 Aplite
231461 1.34 0.68 <0.03 0.84 0.21 0.14 0.9 0.24 0.5 0.18 0.11 0.96 Schist
231462 0.67 0.39 0.18 0.63 0.12 0.07 4.1 1.36 0.86 0.1 0.07 0.46 Gneiss
231463 0.25 0.17 <0.03 0.21 0.05 0.03 0.9 0.25 0.23 0.04 0.03 0.23 Pegmatite
231464 0.36 0.18 <0.03 0.3 0.07 0.05 1.1 0.33 0.3 0.05 0.04 0.29 Granite Pegmatite
Bromus
231850 1.97 1.43 0.3 1.36 0.41 0.3 3.9 0.97 1.3 0.25 0.25 2.05 Granite Pegmatite
231851 0.11 0.07 0.2 0.1 0.02 0.01 0.8 0.22 0.19 0.02 0.01 0.08 Pegmatite
231852 1.97 1.1 0.6 2.52 0.34 0.17 16.6 4.41 3.66 0.35 0.15 1.19 Mafic Schist
231853 0.18 0.11 0.34 0.15 0.03 0.02 0.8 0.24 0.2 0.03 0.02 0.14 Pegmatite
231854 0.46 0.28 0.18 0.31 0.07 0.04 1 0.3 0.3 0.05 0.05 0.3 Granite Pegmatite
231855 0.76 0.41 0.29 0.79 0.13 0.06 4.2 1.12 1.1 0.12 0.06 0.42 Granite Pegmatite
ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm
----- End of picture text -----

8

Exploration Update – January 2024

Further Information – Cullen 2023 ASX Releases

1. 18-1-2023: Soil sampling outlines new targets, Yornup, W.A.

2. 23-1-2023: Soil sampling enhances lithium prospectivity, Bromus South.

3. 31-1-2023: Quarterly Report for the period ending 31 December 2022

4. 3-2-2023: Soil and rock assays highlight lithium prospectivity, Barlee.

5. 13-3-2023: Exploration Update – North Tuckabianna

6. 30-3-2023: Exploration Update – Wongan Hills

7. 17-4-2023: Quarterly Report for the period ending 31 March 2023

8. 31-5-2023: Exploration Permit - Finland

9. 21-6-2023: Exploration Update – Wongan Hills

10. 26-6-2023: Investor Presentation

11. 21-7-2023: Quarterly Report

12. 28-8-2023: Heritage Clearance Received

13. 31-8-2023: Investor Presentation - August

14. 5-9-2023: Pegmatite Targeting – Wongan Hills

15. 21-9-2023: pegmatite Sampling – Three Key Targets

16. 27-9-2023: Annual Report

17. 11-10-2023: Barlee Exploration Update

18. 18-10-2023: New LCT targets, Barlee

19. 27-10-2023: Quarterly Report ending 30 Sept.2023 and NoM AGM 20. 23-10-2023: Share Purchase Plan 21. 8-11-2023: Exploration Update

22. 13-11-2023: Further UF Soil Sampling Lithium Trend, Wongan Hills\ 23. 6-12-2023: Exploration Update – Finland 24. 8-12-2023: Air Core Drilling Completed – Bromus South

9

Exploration Update – January 2024

Data description as required by the 2012 JORC Code - Section 1 and Section 2 of Table 1 Rock Chip Sampling – Barlee, Bromus and Mukinbudin Projects

Section 1 Sampling techniques and data Section 1 Sampling techniques and data Section 1 Sampling techniques and data
Criteria JORC Code explanation Comments
Sampling
technique
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g.,
cut channels, random chips, or specific
specialised
industry
standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as
down hole gamma sondes, or XRF
instruments, etc.). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the
broad meaning of sampling.
Rock samples and laterite collected as available float,
outcrop or at sub-crop. Rock chip samples as 4-8
fragments 1-2kg; selective fragments from float and
small
areas
of
sub–crop,
and
not
necessarily
representative.
Samples collected by qualified geologist on site.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate
calibration
of
any
measurement tools or systems used
The samples were located using handheld GPS units
with an approximate accuracy of +/- 5 m.
Aspects
of
the
determination
of
mineralisation that are material to the
Public report. In cases where ‘industry
standard’ work has been done this
would
be
relatively
simple
(e.g.
‘reverse circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1m samples from which 3kg
was pulverised to produce a 30g charge
for fire assay’). In other cases more
explanation may be required, such as
where there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types
(eg submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
The samples were sent to Perth laboratory ALS for
multi-element analysis.
Pulverized and tested for 85% passing 75 µm. Au
analysed by aqua regia; trace element suite by method
ME- MS61r : ICP_MS + REE.
Drilling
technique
Drill
type
(e.g.,
core,
reverse
circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary
air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic etc.) and
details (e.g. core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails,
face-sampling
bit
or
other
type,
whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method etc.).
Not applicable – no drilling completed.
Drill
Sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing
core and chip sample recoveries and
results assessed
Not applicable – no drilling completed.
Measurements
taken
to
maximise
sample
recovery
and
ensure
representative nature of the samples.
Not applicable – no drilling completed.
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
Not applicable – no drilling completed.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining and metallurgical
studies.
Not applicable – no drilling completed.

10

Exploration Update – January 2024

Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel etc.) photography.
Not applicable – no drilling completed. Rock chip
samples
have
been
described
qualitatively
and
photographed.
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged
Not applicable – no drilling completed
Sub-
sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and
whether quarter, half or all core taken.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
If non-core, whether riffles, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether
sampled wet or dry.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
For all sample types, quality and
appropriateness
of
the
sample
preparation technique.
The rock chip samples are for reconnaissance purposes
only – sample preparation standard and appropriate for
this purpose.
Quality control procedures adopted for
all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Not applicable
Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in situ
material
collected,
including
for
instance
results
for
field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
Not
applicable

rock
chip
samples
are
for
reconnaissance purposes only, collected as available -
some in cultivated wheat paddocks, or across alluvial
terrain with very limited outcrops. No field duplicates
taken. Rock chip samples are composed of multiple
chips but may not be representative given coarse grains
in pegmatites.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate
to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
Appropriate for the purpose.
Quality
of
assay
data
and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness
of
the
assaying
and
laboratory
procedures used and whether the
technique is considered partial or total.
Assaying and laboratory procedures appropriate for
sampling of a reconnaissance nature.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc., the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation,
etc.
Not applicable
Nature of quality control procedures
adopted
(e.g.
standards,
blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks)
and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and
precision have been established.
Blanks, standards, and duplicates inserted by laboratory.
Verification
of sampling
and
assaying
The
verification
of
significant
intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
The use of twinned holes Not applicable – no drillingcompleted

11

Exploration Update – January 2024

Documentation of primary data, data
entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physically and electronic)
protocols.
Sample descriptions taken in the field and stored on files
at office database.
Discuss anyadjustment to assaydata. No adjustment to assaydata as reported bylaboratory.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used
to locate drill holes (collar and down-
hole surveys), trenches, mine workings
and other locations used in Mineral
Resources estimation.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
Specification of the grid system used. All data were acquired using GDA94 zone 50 and 51
coordinate systems
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
Data
spacing and
distribution
Data
spacing
for
reporting
of
Exploration Results.
Rock chip samples collected as available and following
interpreted lines of sub-crop as indicted by aerial photos.
Whether
the
data
spacing
and
distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree
of
geological
and
grade
continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Reserve and Ore Re4serve estimation
procedure(s)
and
classifications
applied.
Not applicable – reconnaissance stage sampling.
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
No sample compositing applied.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this
is known, considering the deposit type.
Surface samples collected as available, may not relate
to orientation of any mineralization.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
Samples secured by Cullen employees and transported
by Cullen to Perth laboratory.
Audits or
reviews
The results of and audits or reviews of
samplingtechniques and data.
No auditing or reviews of surface sampling.
Section 2 Reporting of exploration results
Mineral
tenements
and land
tenure status
Type,
reference
name/number,
location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with
third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships,
overriding
royalties,
native title interest, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
Project tenure as listed in this report – all Cullen
Exploration Pty Ltd 100%. NT party heritage
agreements in place at Barlee and Bromus. Private land
access agreements are required at Mukinbudin for any
future ground disturbing activities.
The security of the tenure held at the
time of reporting along with any
known impediments to obtaining a
licence to operate in the area.
The tenure is secure and in good standing at the time of
writing
Exploration
done by
other parties
Acknowledgement and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
There has been previous drilling by Cullen at Bromus
and Barlee as previously reported, and historical drilling
and exploration at these projects has been referenced
and updated via 2023 Cullen reports to ASX. Previous

12

Exploration Update – January 2024

Mukinbudin area exploration has included exploration
for uranium and gold in an interpreted mixed granite-
greenstone terrane (as referenced). Drilling for uranium
indicated a thick regolith (to 80m) in places.
Geology Deposit type, geological settings and
style of mineralization.
Program of rock chip sampling targeting rare element
pegmatites and granites, (or associated clay-hosted
deposits of REE), and gold in quartz veins.
Drill hole
information
A summary of all information material
for
the
understanding
of
the
exploration
results
including
a
tabulation
of
the
following
information for all Material drill holes:
Not applicable – no drilling completed
· E_asting and northing of the drill hole_
collar
Not applicable – no drilling completed
·Elevation or RL (Reduced level-
elevation
above
sea
level
in
metres)and the drill hole collar
·Dip and azimuth of the hole Not applicable – no drilling completed
·Down hole length and interception
depth
· Hole length
If the exclusion of this information is
justified
on
the
basis
that
the
information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
Data
aggregation
methods
In
reporting
Exploration
results,
weighing
averaging
techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (e.g. cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are usually
material and should be stated
Not applicable – no drilling completed
Where
aggregate
intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high grade
results and longer lengths of low grade
results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some
typical examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
The
assumptions
used
for
any
reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
Not applicable .
Relationship
between
mineralisatio
n widths and
intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly
important
in
the
reporting
of
Exploration Results.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
If the geometry of the mineralisation
with respect to the drill hole angle is
known, its nature should be reported.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
If it is not known and only the down
hole lengths are reported, there should
be a clear statement to this effect (e.g.
‘down hole length, true width not
known’)
Not applicable – no drilling completed

13

Exploration Update – January 2024

Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
would be included for any significant
discovery
being
reported.
These
should include, but not be limited to a
plan view of drill hole collar locations
and appropriate sectional views.
Not applicable – no drilling completed
Balanced
reporting
Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low
and high grades and/or widths should
be practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results.
Not applicable– no drilling completed
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Other exploration data, if meaningful
and material, should be reported
including
(but
not
limited
to):
geological observations, geophysical
survey results, geochemical survey
results, bulk samples – size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test
results; bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or containing
substances.
This report describes rock chip sampling assay results in
context with models targeting LCT-type pegmatites, rare
earth elements in granites and their weathering products,
and gold in quartz veins. Other meaningful data has
been incorporated into the models of mineralisation as
previously reported (ASX: CUL).
Further work The nature and scale of planned
further work (e.g. tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
Further work is planned – likely to include follow-up air
core and /or RC drilling.
Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas of possible extensions, including
the main geological interpretations and
future drilling areas, providing this
information
is
not
commercially
sensitive.
See included figures.

14

Exploration Update – January 2024

ATTRIBUTION: Competent Person Statement

The information in this report that relates to exploration activities is based on information compiled by Dr. Chris Ringrose, Managing Director, Cullen Resources Limited who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Dr. Ringrose is a full-time employee of Cullen Resources Limited. He has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration, and to the activity which has been undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Dr. Ringrose consents to the report being issued in the form and context in which it appears. Information in this report may also reflect past exploration results, and Cullen’s assessment of exploration completed by past explorers, which has not been updated to comply with the JORC 2012 Code. The Company confirms it is not aware of any new information or data which materially affects the information included in this announcement.

ABOUT CULLEN: Cullen is a Perth-based minerals explorer with a multi-commodity portfolio including projects managed through a number of JVs with key partners (Rox, Fortescue, Capella and Lachlan Star), and a number of projects in its own right. The Company’s strategy is to identify and build targets based on data compilation, field reconnaissance and early-stage exploration, and to pursue further testing of targets itself or farm-out opportunities to larger companies. Projects are sought for most commodities mainly in Australia but with selected consideration of overseas opportunities. Cullen has a 1.5% F.O.B. royalty up to 15 Mt of iron ore production from the Wyloo project tenements, part of Fortescue’s Western Hub/Eliwana project, and will receive $900,000 cash if and when a decision is made to commence mining on a commercial basis – from former tenure including E47/1649, 1650, ML 47/1488-1490, and ML 08/502. Cullen has a 1% F.O.B. royalty on any iron ore production from the following former Mt Stuart Iron Ore Joint Venture (Baowu/MinRes/Posco/AMCI) tenements – E08/1135, E08/1330, E08/1341, E08/1292, ML08/481, and ML08/482 (and will receive $1M cash upon any Final Investment Decision). The Catho Well Channel Iron Deposit (CID) has a published in situ Mineral Resources estimate of 161Mt @ 54.40% Fe (ML 08/481) as announced by Cullen to the ASX – 10 March 2015.

FORWARD - LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document may contain certain forward-looking statements which have not been based solely on historical facts but rather on Cullen's expectations about future events and on a number of assumptions which are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and contingencies many of which are outside the control of Cullen and its directors, officers and advisers. Forward-looking statements include, but are not necessarily limited to, statements concerning Cullen’s planned exploration program, strategies and objectives of management, anticipated dates and expected costs or outputs. When used in this document, words such as “could”, “plan”, “estimate” “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “potential”, “should” and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Due care and attention have been taken in the preparation of this document and although Cullen believes that its expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements made in this document are reasonable, no assurance can be given that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. This document should not be relied upon as providing any recommendation or forecast by Cullen or its directors, officers or advisers. To the fullest extent permitted by law, no liability, however arising, will be accepted by Cullen or its directors, officers or advisers, as a result of any reliance upon any forward-looking statement contained in this document.

REGISTERED OFFICE : Unit 4, 7 Hardy Street, South Perth WA 6151.

Telephone: +61 8 9474 5511 Facsimile: +61 8 9474 5588 CONTACT: Dr. Chris Ringrose E-mail : [email protected]; www.cullenresources.com.au

Authorised for release to the ASX by the Board.

15