CubeSmart — Interim / Quarterly Report 2010

Nov 5, 2010

10-Q 1 a10-17599_110q.htm 10-Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.

or

o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 001-32324

U-STORE-IT TRUST

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland	20-1024732
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S.
Employer
Incorporation
or Organization)	Identification
No.)
460 East Swedesford Road
Wayne, Pennsylvania	19087
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip
Code)

(610) 293-5700

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes £ No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

| Large accelerated filer £ | Accelerated filer x | | --- | --- | | Non-accelerated filer £ | Smaller reporting company £ |

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Class	Outstanding at November 1, 2010
common
shares, $.01 par value	95,885,503

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-01.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:50 2010'

Table of Contents

U-STORE-IT TRUST

TABLE OF CONTENTS

| Part I.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item

1. Financial Statements | 4 | | Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 17 | | Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 27 | | Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 28 | | Part II. OTHER INFORMATION | | | Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 28 | | Item 6. Exhibits | 30 |

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or “this Report”, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by U-Store-It Trust (“we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”), contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions and other information that is not historical information. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” or “intends” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Such statements are based on assumptions and expectations that may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated. Although we believe the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, future events and actual results, performance, transactions or achievements, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results, performance, transactions or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. As a result, you should not rely on or construe any forward-looking statements in this Report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, as predictions of future events or as guarantees of future performance. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report or as of the dates otherwise indicated in the statements. All of our forward-looking statements, including those in this Report, are qualified in their entirety by this statement.

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in or contemplated by this Report. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of the risks and uncertainties referred to in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the U-Store-It Trust Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

· changes in national and local economic, business, real estate and other market conditions which, among other things, reduce demand for self-storage facilities or increase costs of owning and operating self-storage facilities;

· competition from other self-storage facilities and storage alternatives, which could result in lower occupancy and decreased rents;

· the execution of our business plan;

· financing risks including the risk of over-leverage and the corresponding risk of default on our mortgage and other debt and potential inability to refinance existing indebtedness;

· increases in interest rates and operating costs;

· counterparty non-performance related to the use of derivative financial instruments;

· our ability to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

2

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='2',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-01.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:50 2010'

Table of Contents

· acquisition and development risks, including unanticipated costs associated with the integration and operation of acquisitions;

· risks of investing through joint ventures, including risks that our joint venture partners may not fulfill their obligations or may pursue actions that are inconsistent with our objectives;

· changes in real estate and zoning laws or regulations, including, without limitation, those laws and regulations governing REITS;

· risks related to natural disasters;

· potential environmental and other liabilities; and

· other risks identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and, from time to time, in other reports that we file with the SEC or in other documents that we publicly disseminate.

Given these uncertainties and the other risks identified elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and in this Report, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as may be required by securities laws.

3

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='3',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-01.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:50 2010'

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

	September 30, — 2010		December 31, — 2009
ASSETS
Storage
facilities	$ 1,745,625		$ 1,774,542
Less:
Accumulated depreciation	(326,314	)	(344,009	)
Storage
facilities, net	1,419,311		1,430,533
Cash
and cash equivalents	23,203		102,768
Restricted
cash	15,528		16,381
Loan
procurement costs, net of amortization	17,351		18,366
Notes
receivable	—		20,112
Assets
held for sale	1,867		—
Other
assets, net	19,934		10,710
Total
assets	$ 1,497,194		$ 1,598,870
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Unsecured
term loan	$ 200,000		$ —
Secured
term loan	—		200,000
Mortgage
loans and notes payable	456,174		569,026
Accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	40,646		33,767
Distributions
payable	2,515		2,448
Deferred
revenue	8,893		8,449
Security
deposits	512		456
Other
liabilities held for sale	22		—
Total
liabilities	708,762		814,146
Noncontrolling
interests in the Operating Partnership	43,871		45,394
Commitments
and contingencies
Equity
Common
shares $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 95,435,132 and
92,654,979 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively	954		927
Additional
paid in capital	998,894		974,926
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss	(924	)	(874	)
Accumulated
deficit	(296,225	)	(279,670	)
Total
U-Store-It Trust shareholders’ equity	702,699		695,309
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiaries	41,862		44,021
Total
equity	744,561		739,330
Total
liabilities and equity	$ 1,497,194		$ 1,598,870

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='4',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-01.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:50 2010'

Table of Contents

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30, — 2010		2009		Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2010		2009
REVENUES
Rental
income	$ 50,809		$ 50,269		$ 149,080		$ 151,008
Other
property related income	5,155		4,347		13,919		12,510
Property
management fee income	1,048		12		1,682		140
Total
revenues	57,012		54,628		164,681		163,658
OPERATING EXPENSES
Property
operating expenses	24,602		23,065		71,921		71,509
Depreciation
and amortization	15,557		17,844		48,258		53,385
General
and administrative	6,597		5,556		19,308		16,658
Total
operating expenses	46,756		46,465		139,487		141,552
OPERATING INCOME	10,256		8,163		25,194		22,106
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest:
Interest
expense on loans	(9,648	)	(12,008	)	(29,324	)	(34,834	)
Loan
procurement amortization expense	(1,559	)	(489	)	(4,718	)	(1,517	)
Interest
income	19		150		616		249
Acquisition
related costs	(165	)	—		(465	)	—
Other	(67	)	—		(142	)	(13	)
Total
other expense	(11,420	)	(12,347	)	(34,033	)	(36,115	)
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS	(1,164	)	(4,184	)	(8,839	)	(14,009	)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Income
from discontinued operations	49		777		143		2,610
Net
gain on disposition of discontinued operations	—		10,910		—		13,530
Total
discontinued operations	49		11,687		143		16,140
NET (LOSS) INCOME	(1,115	)	7,503		(8,696	)	2,131
NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Noncontrolling
interests in the Operating Partnership	76		(512	)	487		(93	)
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiaries	(441	)	(173	)	(1,267	)	(173	)
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY	$ (1,480	)	$ 6,818		$ (9,476	)	$ 1,865
Basic
and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders	$ (0.02	)	$ (0.05	)	$ (0.10	)	$ (0.21	)
Basic
and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to
common shareholders	$ —		$ 0.14		$ —		$ 0.24
Basic
and diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to common shareholders	$ (0.02	)	$ 0.09		$ (0.10	)	$ 0.03
Weighted-average
basic and diluted shares outstanding	93,724		75,248		93,154		63,764
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS:
Loss
from continuing operations	$ (1,527	)	$ (4,098	)	$ (9,613	)	$ (13,210	)
Total
discontinued operations	47		10,916		137		15,075
Net
(loss) income	$ (1,480	)	$ 6,818		$ (9,476	)	$ 1,865

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='5',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-01.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:50 2010'

COMMAND=ROTATED_TABLE WIDTH="150%"

Table of Contents

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

For the Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Common Shares — Number	Amount	Additional Paid in — Capital	Accumulated Other Comprehensive — Loss		Accumulated — Deficit		Total Shareholders’ — Equity		Noncontrolling Interest in — Subsidiaries		Total — Equity		Noncontrolling Interests in the Operating — Partnership
Balance at December 31, 2009	92,655	$ 927	$ 974,926	$ (874	)	$ (279,670	)	$ 695,309		$ 44,021		$ 739,330		$ 45,394
Contributions
from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries	—	—	—	—		—		—		20		20		—
Issuance
of restricted shares	201	2	—	—		—		2		—		2		—
Issuance
of common shares	2,450	24	20,414	—		—		20,438		—		20,438		—
Exercise
of stock options	56	—	194	—		—		194		—		194		—
Conversion
from units to shares	73	1	674	—		—		675		—		675		(675	)
Amortization
of restricted shares	—	—	1,256	—		—		1,256		—		1,256		—
Share
compensation expense	—	—	1,430	—		—		1,430		—		1,430		—
Net
(loss) income	—	—	—	—		(9,476	)	(9,476	)	1,267		(8,209	)	(487	)
Other
comprehensive income:
Unrealized
loss on foreign currency translation	—	—	—	(50	)	—		(50	)	(1	)	(51	)	(3	)
Distributions	—	—	—	—		(7,079	)	(7,079	)	(3,445	)	(10,524	)	(358	)
Balance at September 30, 2010	95,435	$ 954	$ 998,894	$ (924	)	$ (296,225	)	$ 702,699		$ 41,862		$ 744,561		$ 43,871

	Common Shares — Number	Amount	Additional Paid in — Capital	Accumulated Other Comprehensive — Loss		Accumulated — Deficit		Total Shareholders’ — Equity		Noncontrolling Interest in — Subsidiaries		Total — Equity		Noncontrolling Interests in the Operating — Partnership
Balance at December 31, 2008	57,623	$ 576	$ 801,029	$ (7,553	)	$ (271,124	)	$ 522,928		$ —		$ 522,928		$ 46,026
Contributions
from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries	—	—	—	—		—		—		44,794		44,794		(114	)
Issuance
of restricted shares	84	1	—	—		—		1		—		1		—
Issuance
of common shares	34,676	346	170,503	—		—		170,849		—		170,849		—
Amortization
of restricted shares	—	—	1,256	—		—		1,256		—		1,256		—
Share
compensation expense	—	—	1,323	—		—		1,323		—		1,323		—
Net
income	—	—	—	—		1,865		1,865		173		2,038		93
Other
comprehensive income:
Unrealized
gain on interest rate swap	—	—	—	4,538		—		4,538		—		4,538		377
Unrealized
gain on foreign currency translation	—	—	—	535		—		535		—		535		37
Distributions	—	—	—	—		(5,295	)	(5,295	)	(239	)	(5,534	)	(362	)
Balance at September 30, 2009	92,383	$ 923	$ 974,111	$ (2,480	)	$ (274,554	)	$ 698,000		$ 44,728		$ 742,728		$ 46,057

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='6',FILE='C:\JMS\jmathew\10-17599-1\task4339826\17599-1-ba-03.htm',USER='105205',CD='Nov 3 16:35 2010'

Table of Contents

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2010		2009
Operating Activities
Net
(loss) income	$ (8,696	)	$ 2,131
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation
and amortization	53,036		57,689
Gain
on disposition of discontinued operations	—		(13,532	)
Equity
compensation expense	2,686		2,589
Accretion
of fair market value adjustment of debt	(251	)	(348	)
Changes
in other operating accounts:
Other
assets	(1,023	)	(2,860	)
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses	4,898		1,905
Other
liabilities	297		(592	)
Net
cash provided by operating activities	$ 50,947		$ 46,982
Investing Activities
Acquisitions,
additions and improvements to storage facilities	$ (45,037	)	$ (13,142	)
Proceeds
from sales of properties, net	—		61,227
Proceeds
from sales to noncontrolling interests	—		48,674
Proceeds
from repayment of notes receivable	20,112		—
Decrease
(increase) in restricted cash	853		(307	)
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities	$ (24,072	)	$ 96,452
Financing Activities
Proceeds
from:
Revolving
credit facility	$ —		$ 9,500
Mortgage
loans and notes payable	—		73,246
Principal
payments on:
Revolving
credit facility	—		(181,500	)
Secured
term loans	—		(57,419	)
Mortgage
loans and notes payable	(112,576	)	(92,865	)
Proceeds
from issuance of common shares, net	20,438		170,851
Exercise
of stock options	194		—
Contributions
from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries	20		—
Distributions
paid to shareholders	(7,006	)	(4,416	)
Distributions
paid to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership	(362	)	(381	)
Distributions
paid to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries	(3,445	)	(239	)
Loan
procurement costs	(3,703	)	(2,988	)
Net
cash used in financing activities	$ (106,440	)	$ (86,211	)
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(79,565	)	57,223
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period	102,768		3,744
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 23,203		$ 60,967
Supplemental Cash Flow and Noncash Information
Cash
paid for interest, net of interest capitalized	$ 29,609		$ 34,266
Supplemental
disclosure of noncash activities:
Acquisition
related contingent consideration	$ 1,849		$ —
Notes
receivable originated upon disposition of property	$ —		$ 17,600
Derivative
valuation adjustment	$ —		$ 4,915
Foreign
currency translation adjustment	$ (54	)	$ 572
Gain
deferral on sales to noncontrolling interests	$ —		$ 3,992

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='7',FILE='C:\JMS\jmathew\10-17599-1\task4339826\17599-1-ba-05.htm',USER='105205',CD='Nov 3 17:33 2010'

Table of Contents

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

U-Store-It Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (collectively with its subsidiaries, “we”, “us” or the “Company”), is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, that specializes in acquiring, developing, managing and operating self-storage properties for business and personal use under month-to-month leases. The Company’s self-storage facilities (collectively, the “Properties”) are located in 26 states throughout the United States, and in the District of Columbia and are managed under one reportable operating segment: we own, operate, develop, manage and acquire self-storage facilities. The Company owns substantially all of its assets and conducts its operations through U-Store-It, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of September 30, 2010, owned a 95.3% interest in the Operating Partnership. The Company manages its owned assets through YSI Management, LLC (the “Management Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, and manages assets owned by third parties through Storage Asset Management, LLC, also a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership. The Company owns four subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries. In general, a taxable REIT subsidiary, which is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, may perform non-customary services for tenants, hold assets that the Company, as a REIT, cannot hold directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC regarding interim financial reporting and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Accordingly, readers of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should refer to the Company’s audited financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the related notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2009, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as certain footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted from this report pursuant to the rules of the SEC. The results of operations for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for any future period or the full year.

New Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification has changed the manner in which GAAP guidance is referenced, but did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets in June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010. The guidance requires entities to provide more information regarding sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the entity has continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It also eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures. The application did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The FASB issued authoritative guidance on how a company determines when an entity should be consolidated in June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010. The guidance clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. The guidance requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. It also requires additional disclosures

8

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='8',FILE='C:\JMS\jmathew\10-17599-1\task4339826\17599-1-ba-05.htm',USER='105205',CD='Nov 3 17:33 2010'

Table of Contents

about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The application did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

3. STORAGE FACILITIES

The book value of the Company’s real estate assets is summarized as follows:

	September 30, — 2010		December 31, — 2009
	(in thousands)
Land
and improvements	$ 373,576		$ 369,842
Buildings
and improvements	1,265,362		1,243,047
Equipment	102,478		157,452
Construction
in progress	4,209		4,201
Total	1,745,625		1,774,542
Less
accumulated depreciation	(326,314	)	(344,009	)
Storage
facilities, net	$ 1,419,311		$ 1,430,533

As assets become fully depreciated, they are removed from their respective asset category. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, $65.2 million and $38.0 million of assets became fully depreciated and were removed from storage facilities, respectively.

4. ACQUISITIONS

On April 28, 2010, the Company acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”). The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination. The 85 management contracts relate to facilities located in 16 states and the District of Columbia. The Company recorded the fair value of the assets acquired which include the intangible value related to the management contracts and are included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s estimate of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities utilized Level 3 inputs and considered the probability of the expected period the contracts would remain in place, including estimated renewal periods, and the amount of the discounted estimated future contingent payments to be made. The Company paid $4.1 million in cash for the contracts and recognized $1.8 million in contingent consideration. The Company accounts for the contingent consideration liability by recording the changes in fair value of the liability recorded in earnings. The Company has recognized $0.3 million and $0.5 million of amortization during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The Company expensed $0.3 million in transaction related costs during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that are included in acquisition related costs on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The estimated life of the intangible value of the management contracts is 56 months and the remaining amortization expense that will be recognized during 2010 is $0.3 million.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company acquired one self-storage facility located in Frisco, TX and two self-storage facilities located in New York, NY. In connection with these acquisitions, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $2.3 million. The estimated life of these in-place leases is 12 months and the estimated amortization expense that will be recognized during 2010 is approximately $0.6 million.

The following table summarizes the Company’s acquisition activity during the period January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010:

9

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='9',FILE='C:\JMS\jmathew\10-17599-1\task4339826\17599-1-ba-05.htm',USER='105205',CD='Nov 3 17:33 2010'

Table of Contents

Facility/Portfolio	Location	Transaction Date	Total Number of Facilities	Gross Purchase Price (in thousands)
2010 Acquisitions:
Frisco
Asset	Frisco,
TX	July 2010	1	$ 5,800
New
York City Assets	New
York, NY	September 2010	2	26,700
			3	$ 32,500

5. UNSECURED CREDIT FACILITY

On December 8, 2009, the Company and its Operating Partnership entered into a three-year, $450 million senior secured credit facility (the “Secured Credit Facility”), consisting of a $200 million secured term loan and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility. The Secured Credit Facility was collateralized by mortgages on “borrowing base properties” (as defined in the Secured Credit Facility agreement). The Secured Credit Facility replaced the prior, three-year $450 million unsecured credit facility, which was entered into in November 2006, and consisted of a $200 million unsecured term loan and $250 million in unsecured revolving loans. All borrowings under the unsecured credit facility were repaid in December 2009.

On September 29, 2010, the Company amended its existing $450 million credit facility. The amended credit facility consists of a $200 million unsecured term loan and a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The amended credit facility has a three year term expiring on December 7, 2013, is unsecured, and borrowings on the facility incur interest based on a borrowing spread based on the Company’s leverage levels plus LIBOR. The Company incurred $2.5 million in connection with executing this amendment which was capitalized and is included as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

At September 30, 2010, $200 million of unsecured term loan borrowings were outstanding under the unsecured credit facility and $250 million was available for borrowing under the unsecured revolving credit facility. As of September 30, 2010, borrowings under the unsecured credit facility had a weighted average interest rate of 3.8% and the Company was in compliance with all covenants in the amended agreement.

6. MORTGAGE LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE

The Company’s mortgage loans and related notes payable are summarized as follows:

10

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='10',FILE='C:\JMS\jmathew\10-17599-1\task4339826\17599-1-ba-05.htm',USER='105205',CD='Nov 3 17:33 2010'

Table of Contents

	Carrying Value as of: — September 30,		December 31,	Effective	Maturity
Mortgage Loan	2010		2009	Interest Rate	Date
	(in thousands)
YSI
1	$ —		$ 83,342	5.19 %	May-10
YSI
4	—		6,065	5.25 %	Jul-10
YSI
26	—		9,475	5.00 %	Aug-10
YSI
25	—		7,975	5.00 %	Oct-10
USIFB	3,809		3,834	4.59 %	Dec-10
YSI
2	82,121		83,480	5.33 %	Jan-11
YSI
12	1,488		1,520	5.97 %	Sep-11
YSI
13	1,279		1,307	5.97 %	Sep-11
YSI
6	76,453		77,370	5.13 %	Aug-12
YASKY	80,000		80,000	4.96 %	Sep-12
YSI
14	1,773		1,812	5.97 %	Jan-13
YSI
7	3,116		3,163	6.50 %	Jun-13
YSI
8	1,781		1,808	6.50 %	Jun-13
YSI
9	1,959		1,988	6.50 %	Jun-13
YSI
17	4,153		4,246	6.32 %	Jul-13
YSI
27	503		516	5.59 %	Nov-13
YSI
30	7,381		7,567	5.59 %	Nov-13
YSI
11	2,437		2,486	5.87 %	Dec-13
YSI
5	3,216		3,281	5.25 %	Jan-14
YSI
28	1,566		1,598	5.59 %	Feb-14
YSI
34	14,856		14,955	8.00 %	Jun-14
YSI
37	2,219		2,244	7.25 %	Aug-14
YSI
40	2,536		2,581	7.25 %	Aug-14
YSI
44	1,102		1,121	7.00 %	Sep-14
YSI
41	3,904		3,976	6.60 %	Sep-14
YSI
38	4,000		4,078	6.35 %	Sep-14
YSI
45	5,465		5,527	6.75 %	Oct-14
YSI
46	3,444		3,486	6.75 %	Oct-14
YSI
43	2,938		2,994	6.50 %	Nov-14
YSI
48	25,369		25,652	7.25 %	Nov-14
YSI
50	2,337		2,380	6.75 %	Dec-14
YSI
10	4,110		4,166	5.87 %	Jan-15
YSI
15	1,888		1,920	6.41 %	Jan-15
YSI
20	62,919		64,258	5.97 %	Nov-15
YSI
31	13,719		13,891	6.75 %	Jun-19	(a)
YSI
35	4,499		4,499	6.90 %	Jul-19	(a)
YSI
32	6,084		6,160	6.75 %	Jul-19	(a)
YSI
33	11,422		11,570	6.42 %	Jul-19
YSI
42	3,204		3,263	6.88 %	Aug-19	(a)
YSI
39	3,947		3,991	6.50 %	Nov-19	(a)
YSI
47	3,197		3,250	6.63 %	Jan-20	(a)
Unamortized
fair value adjustment	(20	)	231
Total
mortgage loans and notes payable	$ 456,174		$ 569,026

11

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='11',FILE='C:\JMS\jmathew\10-17599-1\task4339826\17599-1-ba-05.htm',USER='105205',CD='Nov 3 17:33 2010'

Table of Contents

(a) These borrowings have a fixed interest rate for the first five years of their respective term. At the end of the initial five year term, the rate resets and remains constant over the remaining five years of the loan term.

The following table presents the future principal payments on outstanding mortgage loans and notes payable at September 30, 2010 (in thousands):

2010	$
2011	90,544
2012	159,984
2013	26,240
2014	88,260
2015
and thereafter	85,381
Total
mortgage payments	456,194
Plus:
Fair value adjustment	(20	)
Total
mortgage indebtedness	$ 456,174

7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

In January 2008, the FASB issued a pronouncement regarding the methods to value financial assets and liabilities. The Company adopted this pronouncement effective January 1, 2009. As defined in the guidance, fair value is based on the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

In April 2009, the FASB issued a pronouncement regarding disclosures about fair value of financial instruments and a pronouncement which amends GAAP as follows: a) to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements and b) to require disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. This pronouncement is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to management as of the valuation date. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts at which these instruments could be purchased, sold or settled. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The fair value of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their respective book values at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had fixed interest rate loans with a carrying value of $456.2 million and $569.0 million, respectively. The estimated fair values of these fixed rate loans were $442.0 million and $530.7 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Company had a variable interest rate loan with a carrying value of $200.0 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of which approximated its carrying value at each respective date. These estimates are based on discounted cash flow analyses assuming market interest rates for comparable obligations at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

12

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='12',FILE='C:\JMS\kthiyag\10-17599-1\task4340014\17599-1-ba-07.htm',USER='105072',CD='Nov 3 19:09 2010'

Table of Contents

8. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

Variable Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

On August 13, 2009, the Company, through a wholly-owned affiliate, formed a joint venture (“HART”) with an affiliate of Heitman, LLC (“Heitman”) to own and operate 22 self-storage facilities, which are located throughout the United States. Upon formation, Heitman contributed approximately $51 million of cash to a newly-formed limited partnership and the Company contributed certain unencumbered wholly-owned properties with an agreed upon value of approximately $102 million to such limited partnership. In exchange for its contribution of those properties, the Company received a cash distribution from HART of approximately $51 million and retained a 50% interest in HART. The Company is the managing partner of HART and the manager of the properties owned by HART in exchange for a market rate management fee.

The Company determined that HART is a variable interest entity under GAAP, and that the Company is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the assets, liabilities and results of operations of HART. The 50% interest that is owned by Heitman is reflected as noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries within permanent equity, separate from the Company’s equity on the consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2010, HART had total assets of $90.1 million, including $88.5 million of storage facilities, net and total liabilities of $2.4 million.

USIFB, LLP (“the Venture”) was formed to own, operate, acquire and develop self-storage facilities in England. The Company owns a 97% interest in the Venture through a wholly-owned subsidiary and the Venture commenced operations at two facilities in London, England during 2008. The Company determined that the Venture is a variable interest entity under GAAP, and that the Company is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Venture. At September 30, 2010, the Venture had total assets of $8.1 million and total liabilities of $4.1 million including a mortgage loan of $3.8 million secured by storage facilities with a net book value of $7.6 million. At September 30, 2010, the Venture’s creditors had no recourse to the general credit of the Company.

Operating Partnership Ownership

The Company has followed the FASB guidance regarding the classification and measurement of redeemable securities. Under this guidance, securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets, at the option of the holder and not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of permanent equity. This classification results in certain outside ownership interests being included as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions. Additionally, with respect to noncontrolling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the redemption by delivery of its own shares, the Company considered the guidance regarding accounting for derivative financial instruments indexed to, and potentially settled in, a company’s own shares, to evaluate whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to presume share settlement. The guidance also requires that noncontrolling interests classified outside of permanent equity be adjusted each period to the greater of the carrying value based on the accumulation of historical cost or the redemption value.

The consolidated results of the Company include results attributable to units of the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Company, which amounted to approximately 4.7% of all outstanding Partnership units as of September 30, 2010 and 4.9 % of all outstanding Partnership units as of December 31, 2009. The interests in the Operating Partnership represented by these units were a component of the consideration that the Company paid to acquire certain self-storage facilities. The holders of the units are limited partners in the Operating Partnership and have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their units for, at the Company’s option, an equivalent number of common shares of the Company or cash based upon the fair value of an equivalent number of common shares of the Company. However, the partnership agreement contains certain provisions that could result in a settlement outside the control of the Company. Accordingly, consistent with the guidance, the Company will record these noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Net income or loss related to these noncontrolling interests is excluded from net income or loss attributable to the Company in the consolidated statements of operations.

The per unit cash redemption amount would equal the average of the closing prices of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the 10 trading days ending prior to the Company’s receipt of the redemption notice for the applicable unit. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, 4,737,136 and 4,809,636 units were outstanding, respectively, and the calculated aggregate redemption value of outstanding Operating Partnership units based upon the Company’s average closing share prices, as

13

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='13',FILE='C:\JMS\kthiyag\10-17599-1\task4340014\17599-1-ba-07.htm',USER='105072',CD='Nov 3 19:09 2010'

Table of Contents

referenced above, was approximately $40.2 million and $35.4 million, respectively. Based on the Company’s evaluation of the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest, the Company has reflected these interests at their carrying value as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 because the carrying cost exceeded the estimated redemption value.

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During 2005 and 2006, the Operating Partnership entered into various office lease agreements with Amsdell and Amsdell, an entity owned by Robert Amsdell and Barry Amsdell (each a former Trustee). Pursuant to these lease agreements, the Operating Partnership rented office space in the Airport Executive Park, an office and flex development located in Cleveland, Ohio, which is owned by Amsdell and Amsdell. The Company’s independent Trustees approved the terms of, and entry into, each of the office lease agreements by the Operating Partnership. In addition to monthly rent, the office lease agreements require the Operating Partnership to reimburse Amsdell and Amsdell for certain maintenance and improvements to the leased office space. The aggregate amount of payments by the Company to Amsdell and Amsdell under these lease agreements for each of the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was approximately $0.1 million. Additionally, the aggregate amount of payments for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was approximately $0.3 million. The Company vacated the office space owned by Amsdell and Amsdell in 2007, but remains obligated under certain of the lease agreements through 2014. Subsequently, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for a portion of the space with a third party for the remainder of the lease term.

Total future minimum rental payments under the related party lease agreements as of September 30, 2010 are as follows:

	Due to Related Party	Due from Subtenant
	Amount	Amount
	(in thousands)
2010	$ 114	$ 70
2011	475	278
2012	475	278
2013	499	278
2014	499	278
	$ 2,062	$ 1,182

10. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

For the three months ended September 30, 2010, income from discontinued operations relates to one property that was considered held-for-sale at September 30, 2010. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, income from discontinued operations relates to 13 properties sold through September 30, 2009, two properties that were considered held-for-sale at September 30, 2009, the aforementioned property held-for-sale at September 30, 2010, and one property removed due to eminent domain proceedings. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, income from discontinued operations relates to one property that was considered held-for-sale at September 30, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, income from discontinued operations relates to 16 properties sold during 2009, two properties that were considered held-for-sale at September 30, 2009, the aforementioned property held-for-sale at September 30, 2010, and one property removed due to eminent domain proceedings. Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations relates to gains recognized on property sales completed during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

The following table summarizes the revenue and expense information for the properties classified as discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

14

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='14',FILE='C:\JMS\kthiyag\10-17599-1\task4340014\17599-1-ba-07.htm',USER='105072',CD='Nov 3 19:09 2010'

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended — September 30,		Nine Months Ended — September 30,
	2010	2009	2010	2009
REVENUES
Rental
income	$ 96	$ 2,239	$ 287	$ 7,716
Other
property related income	13	163	31	564
Total
revenues	109	2,402	318	8,280
OPERATING
EXPENSES
Property
operating expenses	40	770	115	2,883
Depreciation	20	855	60	2,787
Total
operating expenses	60	1,625	175	5,670
INCOME
FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS	49	777	143	2,610
Net
gain on disposition of discontinued operations	—	10,910	—	13,530
Income
from discontinued operations	$ 49	$ 11,687	$ 143	$ 16,140

As of September 30, 2010, the property held-for-sale includes $1.9 million of storage facilities, net and the approximate gain on disposition of the property is $1.1 million and will be finalized as the sale is consummated.

11. PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

During 2010, the Company completed an acquisition accounted for as a business combination of 85 management contracts from United Stor-All. Additionally, during the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company acquired three self-storage facilities for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $32.5 million (see note 4).

The consolidated pro forma financial information set forth below reflects adjustments to the Company’s historical financial data to give effect to the acquisitions as if they had occurred at the beginning of each period presented. The unaudited pro forma information presented below does not purport to represent what the Company’s actual results of operations would have been for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to represent the Company’s future results of operations.

The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis, the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 based on the assumptions described above:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2010		2009
	(in thousands, except per share data)
	(unaudited)
Pro
forma revenue	$ 168,049		$ 169,066
Pro
forma net loss from continuing operations	$ (9,588	)	$ (15,795	)
Net
loss per common share
Basic
and diluted - as reported	$ (0.10	)	$ (0.21	)
Basic
and diluted - as pro forma	$ (0.11	)	$ (0.23	)

15

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='15',FILE='C:\JMS\kthiyag\10-17599-1\task4340014\17599-1-ba-07.htm',USER='105072',CD='Nov 3 19:09 2010'

Table of Contents

12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

	Three Months Ended September 30, — 2010		2009		Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2010		2009
	(in thousands)
NET
INCOME (LOSS)	$ (1,115	)	$ 7,503		$ (8,696	)	$ 2,131
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized
gain on derivative financial instruments	—		2,000		—		4,915
Unrealized
gain (loss) on foreign currency translation	195		(197	)	(54	)	572
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)	$ (920	)	$ 9,306		$ (8,750	)	$ 7,618

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 12, 2010, the Company repaid the YSI 2 mortgage loan of approximately $82.1 million that had a scheduled maturity date of January 11, 2011 with available cash and borrowings from the credit facility. There were no prepayment costs associated with the early repayment of the loan.

16

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='16',FILE='C:\JMS\kthiyag\10-17599-1\task4340014\17599-1-ba-07.htm',USER='105072',CD='Nov 3 19:09 2010'

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. The Company makes certain statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this report entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.” Certain risk factors may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion. For a discussion of such risk factors, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in Part II, Item 1A — Risk Factors, in our subsequent quarterly reports.

Overview

The Company is an integrated self-storage real estate company, has and as such we have in-house capabilities in the operation, design, development, leasing, management and acquisition of self-storage facilities. The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company owned 370 and 367 self-storage facilities, respectively, totaling approximately 23.9 million rentable square feet and 23.7 million rentable square feet, respectively. In addition, as of September 30, 2010, the Company managed 122 properties for third parties bringing the total number of properties which it owned and/or managed to 492.

We derive revenues principally from rents received from its customers who rent units at its self-storage facilities under month-to-month leases, and, to a lesser extent, from the management of properties owned by third parties. Therefore, our operating results depend materially on our ability to retain our existing customers and lease our available self-storage units to new customers while maintaining and, where possible, increasing our pricing levels. In addition, our operating results depend on the ability of our customers to make required rental payments to us. We believe that our decentralized approach to the management and operation of our facilities, which places an emphasis on local, market level oversight and control, allows us to respond quickly and effectively to changes in local market conditions, increasing rents where appropriate, while maintaining occupancy levels, or increasing occupancy levels while maintaining pricing levels.

We typically experience seasonal fluctuations in the occupancy levels of our facilities, which are generally slightly higher during the summer months due to increased moving activity.

The United States has recently experienced an economic downturn that has resulted in higher unemployment, shrinking demand for products, large-scale business failures and tight credit markets. Our results of operations may be sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending, as well as to increased bad debts due to recessionary pressures. A continuation of ongoing adverse economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, tax rates, fuel and energy costs, and other matters could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to other products and services. A general reduction in the level of discretionary spending or shifts in consumer discretionary spending could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

In the future, we intend to focus on internal growth opportunities and selectively pursuing targeted acquisitions and developments of self-storage facilities. We would expect to fund any such future acquisitions or developments with additional borrowings.

We have one reportable operating segment: we own, operate, develop, manage, and acquire self-storage facilities.

Our self-storage facilities are located in major metropolitan and rural areas and have numerous tenants per facility. No single tenant represents a significant concentration of our revenues. The facilities in Florida, California, Texas and Illinois provided approximately 17%, 15%, 10% and 7%, respectively, of total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The facilities in Florida, California, Texas and Illinois provided approximately 18%, 15%, 10% and 7%, respectively, of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

17

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='17',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-09.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:54 2010'

Table of Contents

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies and estimates that management believes are critical to an understanding of the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report. These policies require the application of judgment and assumptions by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty. Due to this uncertainty, actual results could differ from estimates calculated and utilized by management.

Self-Storage Facilities

We record self-storage facilities at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation on the buildings and equipment is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to 40 years. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

When facilities are acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values. When a portfolio of facilities is acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the individual facilities at fair value which may include an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates, which take into account the relative size, age and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available. Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon comparable market sales information for land, buildings and improvements and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment.

In allocating the purchase price, we determine whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities, which may include the value of in-place leases, above or below market lease intangibles, and tenant relationships. Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired facilities are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts. Accordingly, to date no portion of the purchase price has been allocated to above- or below-market lease intangibles. To date, no intangible asset has been recorded for the value of tenant relationships, because the we do not have any concentrations of significant tenants and the average tenant turnover is fairly frequent.

Long-lived assets classified as “held for use” are reviewed for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. The carrying values of these long-lived assets are compared to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the assets. An impairment loss is recorded if the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the asset. The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset. Future events, or facts and circumstances that currently exist, that we have not yet identified, could cause us to conclude in the future that our long-lived assets are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. No impairment was recorded for the periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

We consider long-lived assets to be “held for sale” upon satisfaction of the following criteria: (a) management commits to a plan to sell a facility (or group of facilities), (b) the facility is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such facilities, (c) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the facility have been initiated, (d) the sale of the facility is probable and transfer of the asset is expected to be completed within one year, (e) the facility is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value, and (f) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.

Typically these criteria are all met when the relevant assets are under contract, significant non-refundable deposits have been made by the potential buyer, the assets are immediately available for transfer and there are no contingencies related to the sale that may prevent the transaction from closing. In most transactions, these contingencies are not satisfied until the actual closing of the transaction; and, accordingly, the facility is generally not identified as held for sale until the closing occurs. However, each potential transaction is evaluated based on its separate facts and circumstances. Properties classified as held for sale are reported at the lesser of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

Revenue Recognition

Management has determined that all of our leases with tenants are operating leases. Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the lease agreements or contracts, which generally are month-to-month.

18

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='18',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-09.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:54 2010'

Table of Contents

Management fee revenues are recognized monthly as services are performed and in accordance with the terms of the related management agreements.

We recognize gains on disposition of properties only upon closing in accordance with the guidance on sales of real estate. Payments received from purchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits. Profit on real estate sold is recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured and we are not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale. Profit may be deferred in whole or part until the sale meets the requirements of profit recognition on sales under this guidance.

Share-Based Payments

We apply the fair value method of accounting for contingently issued shares and share options issued under our equity incentive plans. Accordingly, share compensation expense is recorded ratably over the vesting period relating to such contingently issued shares and options. The Company has elected to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line method over the requisite service period.

Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests are the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests. Noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations, revenues, expenses and net income or loss related to these noncontrolling interests is excluded from net income or loss attributable to the Company. Presentation of consolidated equity activity is included for both quarterly and annual financial statements, including beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity. The Company has adjusted the carrying value of its noncontrolling interests subject to redemption value to the extent applicable.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The FASB established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification has changed the manner in which U.S. GAAP guidance is referenced, but did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets in June 2009, which was adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010. The guidance requires entities to provide more information regarding sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the entity has continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It also eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures. The application did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The FASB issued authoritative guidance on how a company determines when an entity should be consolidated in June 2009, which was adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010. The guidance clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. The guidance requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. It also requires additional disclosures about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The application did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Results of Operations

The following discussion of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto. Historical results set forth in the consolidated statements of operations reflect only the existing facilities and should not be taken as indicative of future operations.

19

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='19',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-09.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:54 2010'

Table of Contents

Acquisition and Development Activities

The comparability of the Company’s results of operations is affected by the timing of acquisition and disposition activities during the periods reported. At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company owned 370 and 368 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively. The following table summarizes the change in number of owned self-storage facilities from January 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010:

| Balance

• January 1 | 2010 — 367 | 2009 — 387 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Facilities acquired | — | — | | | Facilities sold | — | (1 | ) | | Balance
• March 31 | 367 | 386 | | | Facilities acquired | — | — | | | Facilities sold | — | (2 | ) | | Balance
• June 30 | 367 | 384 | | | Facilities acquired | 3 | — | | | Facilities sold | — | (16 | ) | | Balance
• September 30 | 370 | 368 | | | Facilities acquired | | — | | | Facilities sold | | (1 | ) | | Balance
• December 31 | | 367 | |

Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2010 to the three months ended September 30, 2009

The following table and subsequent discussion provides information pertaining to our portfolio for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. We consider our same-store portfolio to consist of only those facilities owned, and operated on a stabilized basis, at the beginning and at the end of the applicable periods presented. Same-store results are considered to be useful to investors in evaluating our performance as they provide information relating to changes in facility-level operating performance without taking into account the effects of acquisitions, developments or dispositions.

20

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='20',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-09.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:54 2010'

Table of Contents

					Non Same-Store		Other/
	Same Store Property Portfolio				Properties		Eliminations				Total Portfolio
	(dolloars in thousands)
			Increase/	%											Increase/
	2010	2009	(Decrease)	Change	2010	2009	2010		2009		2010		2009		(Decrease)		Change
REVENUES:
Rental income	$ 50,312	$ 49,885	$ 427	1 %	$ 497	$ 384	$ —		$ —		$ 50,809		$ 50,269		$ 540		1 %
Other property related
income	4,577	4,224	353	8 %	233	123	345		—		5,155		4,347		808		19 %
Property management fee
income	—	—	—	0 %	—	—	1,048		12		1,048		12		1,036		8633 %
Total revenues	54,889	54,109	780	1 %	730	507	1,393		12		57,012		54,628		2,384		4 %
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Property operating
expenses	21,610	21,011	599	3 %	590	316	2,402		1,738		24,602		23,065		1,537		7 %
NET OPERATING INCOME:	33,279	33,098	181	1 %	140	191	(1,009	)	(1,726	)	32,410		31,563		847		3 %
Depreciation and
amortization											15,557		17,844		(2,287	)	-13 %
General and
administrative											6,597		5,556		1,041		19 %
Subtotal											22,154		23,400		(1,246	)	-5 %
Operating income											10,256		8,163		2,093		26 %
Other Income (Expense):
Interest:
Interest expense on
loans											(9,648	)	(12,008	)	2,360		-20 %
Loan procurement
amortization expense											(1,559	)	(489	)	(1,070	)	219 %
Interest income											19		150		(131	)	-87 %
Acquisition related
costs											(165	)	—		(165	)	-100 %
Other											(67	)	—		(67	)	-100 %
Total other expense											(11,420	)	(12,347	)	927		-8 %
LOSS FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS											(1,164	)	(4,184	)	3,020		-72 %
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Income from discontinued
operations											49		777		(728	)	-94 %
Net gain on disposition
of discontinued operations											—		10,910		(10,910	)	-100 %
Total discontinued
operations											49		11,687		(11,638	)	-100 %
NET (LOSS) INCOME											$ (1,115	)	$ 7,503		$ (8,618	)	-115 %
NET LOSS (INCOME)
ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Noncontrolling interests
in the Operating											76		(512	)	588		-115 %
Partnership											(441	)	(173	)	(268	)	155 %
Noncontrolling interests
in subsidiaries
NET (LOSS) INCOME
ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY											$ (1,480	)	$ 6,818		$ (8,298	)	-122 %

Total Portfolio

Revenues

Rental income increased from $50.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $50.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $0.5 million. This increase is primarily attributable to increases in average occupancy and scheduled annual rent per square foot on the same-store portfolio in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period.

Other property related income increased from $4.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $5.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $0.9 million, or 19%. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase of $0.7 million in tenant insurance commissions and fee income during the third quarter 2010 as compared to the third quarter 2009.

Property management fee income increased to $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from $12,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $1.0 million. This increase is attributable to an increase in management fees related to the third party management business, which included 122 facilities as of September 30, 2010 and 6 facilities as of September 30, 2009.

Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses increased from $23.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $24.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $1.5 million, or 7%. This increase is primarily attributable to a $1.0 million

21

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='21',FILE='C:\JMS\105586\10-17599-1\task4340475\17599-1-ba-09.htm',USER='105586',CD='Nov 3 20:54 2010'

Table of Contents

increase in marketing expenses during the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period relating to the timing of our marketing spend in 2010 compared to 2009 as well as $0.3 million of increased expenses associated with lease-up activities at non same-store properties.

Depreciation and amortization decreased from $17.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $15.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $2.2 million or 13%. This decrease is primarily attributable to depreciation expense recognized in the 2009 period related to assets that became fully depreciated during 2009, with no similar activity on these fully depreciated assets in the 2010 period.

General and administrative expenses increased from $5.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $6.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $1.0 million, or 19%. This increase is primarily attributable to additional personnel costs related to the addition of team members during the 2010 period to support operational functions of the Company.

Other Expenses

Interest expense decreased from $12.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $9.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 20%. The decrease is attributable to a decrease in total outstanding debt from $728.1 million as of September 30, 2009 to $656.2 million as of September 30, 2010. More specifically, we paid off of the $83.3 million YSI 1 loan during the first quarter of 2010, the $9.4 million YSI 26 loan and the $6.0 million YSI 4 loan during the second quarter of 2010, and the $7.9 million YSI 25 loan during the third quarter of 2010.

Discontinued Operations

Income from discontinued operations decreased from $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The income from discontinued operations in 2009 represents the income during the three months ended September 30, 2009 from the properties sold throughout 2009 as well as one property held for sale at September 30, 2010, while the income from discontinued operations in 2010 represents income related to one property held for sale as of September, 30, 2010. Net gains on disposition of discontinued operations decreased from $10.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to no such gains for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of the sale of 14 assets during the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to no such asset sales during the 2010 period.

Same-Store Property Portfolio

Same-store revenues increased from $54.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $54.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $0.8 million or 1%. This increase is primarily attributable to increases in average occupancy and scheduled annual rent per square foot on the same-store portfolio in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period. Same-store property operating expenses increased from $21.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $21.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $0.6 million or 3%. This increase is primarily attributable to a $0.8 million increase in marketing expense offset by a $0.1 million decrease in real estate tax expense during the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period.

22

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='22',FILE='C:\JMS\105684\10-17599-1\task4341467\17599-1-ba-11.htm',USER='105684',CD='Nov 4 02:47 2010'

Table of Contents

Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009

						Non Same-Store		Other/
	Same Store Property Portfolio					Properties		Eliminations				Total Portfolio
	(dolloars in thousands)
			Increase/		%											Increase/
	2010	2009	(Decrease)		Change	2010	2009	2010		2009		2010		2009		(Decrease)		Change
REVENUES:
Rental income	$ 148,107	$ 150,163	$ (2,056	)	-1 %	$ 973	$ 845	$ —		$ —		$ 149,080		$ 151,008		$ (1,928	)	-1 %
Other property related
income	12,968	12,225	743		6 %	606	285	345		—		13,919		12,510		1,409		11 %
Property management fee
income	—	—	—		0 %	—	—	1,682		140		1,682		140		1,542		1101 %
Total revenues	161,075	162,388	(1,313	)	-1 %	1,579	1,130	2,027		140		164,681		163,658		1,023		1 %
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Property operating
expenses	64,349	65,312	(963	)	-1 %	1,337	703	6,235		5,494		71,921		71,509		412		1 %
NET OPERATING INCOME:	96,726	97,076	(350	)	0 %	242	427	(4,208	)	(5,354	)	92,760		92,149		611		1 %
Depreciation and
amortization												48,258		53,385		(5,127	)	-10 %
General and
administrative												19,308		16,658		2,650		16 %
Subtotal												67,566		70,043		(2,477	)	-4 %
Operating income												25,194		22,106		3,088		14 %
Other Income (Expense):
Interest:
Interest expense on
loans												(29,324	)	(34,834	)	5,510		-16 %
Loan procurement
amortization expense												(4,718	)	(1,517	)	(3,201	)	211 %
Interest income												616		249		367		147 %
Acquisition related
costs												(465	)	—		(465	)	-100 %
Other												(142	)	(13	)	(129	)	992 %
Total other expense												(34,033	)	(36,115	)	2,082		-6 %
LOSS FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS												(8,839	)	(14,009	)	5,170		-37 %
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Income from discontinued
operations												143		2,610		(2,467	)	-95 %
Net gain on disposition
of discontinued operations												—		13,530		(13,530	)	-100 %
Total discontinued
operations												143		16,140		(15,997	)	-99 %
NET (LOSS) INCOME												$ (8,696	)	$ 2,131		$ (10,827	)	-508 %
NET LOSS (INCOME)
ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Noncontrolling interests
in the Operating Partnership												487		(93	)	580		-624 %
Noncontrolling interests
in subsidiaries												(1,267	)	(173	)	(1,094	)	632 %
NET (LOSS) INCOME
ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY												$ (9,476	)	$ 1,865		$ (11,341	)	-608 %

Revenues

Rental income decreased from $151.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $149.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 1%. This decrease is primarily attributable to an increase in average occupancy offset by a decrease in realized annual rent per square foot from the same-store properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Other property related income increased from $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $13.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $1.4 million, or 11%. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase of $1.0 million in tenant insurance commissions and fee income during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Property management fee income increased to $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $1.6 million. This increase is attributable to an increase in management fees related to the third party management business, which included 122 facilities as of September 30, 2010 and 6 facilities as of September 30, 2009.

23

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='23',FILE='C:\JMS\105684\10-17599-1\task4341467\17599-1-ba-11.htm',USER='105684',CD='Nov 4 02:47 2010'

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses increased from $71.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $71.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $0.4 million, or 1%. This increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in expenses pertaining to our same-store portfolio, which are primarily attributable to a reduction in real estate tax expenses during the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period, offset by an increase in non same-store and other property expenses primarily attributable to the lease up of non same-store properties and the addition of third party management facilities during the 2010 period.

Depreciation and amortization decreased from $53.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $48.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $5.1 million, or 10%. This decrease is primarily attributable to depreciation expense recognized in the 2009 period related to assets that became fully depreciated during 2009, with no similar activity on these fully depreciated assets in the 2010 period.

General and administrative expenses increased from $16.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $19.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $2.6 million, or 16%. This increase is primarily attributable to additional personnel costs related to the addition of team members during the 2010 period to support operational functions of the Company as well as non recurring contract related costs incurred in conjunction with employment agreement modifications.

Other Expenses

Interest expense decreased from $34.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $29.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $5.5 million, or 16%. The decrease is attributable to a decrease in total outstanding debt from $977.5 million as of January 1, 2009 to $656.2 million as of September 30, 2010. The decrease is attributable to the payoff of multiple mortgages as well as $172.0 million of credit facility borrowings, which resulted in decreased interest expense.

Discontinued Operations

Income from discontinued operations decreased from $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The income from discontinued operations in 2009 represents the income during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from properties sold throughout 2009 and one property held-for-sale as of September 30, 2010, while the income from discontinued operations in 2010 represents income related to one property held-for-sale as of September 30, 2010. Net gains on disposition of discontinued operations decreased from $13.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to no such gains for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of the sale of 17 assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to no asset sales during the 2010 period.

Same-Store Property Portfolio

Same-store revenues decreased from $162.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $161.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 1%. This decrease is primarily attributable to an increase in average occupancy offset by a decrease in realized annual rent per occupied square foot on the same-store portfolio in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period. Same-store property operating expenses decreased from $65.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $64.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $1.0 million or 1%. This decrease is primarily attributable to a $0.9 million decrease in real estate tax expense and a $0.3 million decrease in utility expenses during the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

NOI

We define net operating income, which we refer to as “NOI,” as total continuing revenues less continuing property operating expenses. NOI also can be calculated by adding back to net income (loss): interest expense on loans, loan procurement amortization expense, acquisition related costs, amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, other expense, depreciation and amortization expense, general and administrative expense, and deducting from net income: income from discontinued operations, gains on disposition of discontinued operations, other income, and interest income. NOI is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP.

24

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='24',FILE='C:\JMS\105684\10-17599-1\task4341467\17599-1-ba-11.htm',USER='105684',CD='Nov 4 02:47 2010'

Table of Contents

We use NOI as a measure of operating performance at each of our facilities, and for all of our facilities in the aggregate. NOI should not be considered as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows provided by operating, investing and financing activities, or other income statement or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

We believe NOI is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because:

· It is one of the primary measures used by our management and our facility managers to evaluate the economic productivity of our facilities, including our ability to lease our facilities, increase pricing and occupancy, and control our property operating expenses;

· It is widely used in the real estate industry and the self-storage industry to measure the performance and value of real estate assets without regard to various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, such as depreciation and amortization expense, which can vary depending upon accounting methods and the book value of assets; and

· It helps our investors to meaningfully compare the results of our operating performance from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense on our outstanding indebtedness) and depreciation of our basis in our assets from our operating results.

There are material limitations to using a measure such as NOI, including the difficulty associated with comparing results among more than one company and the inability to analyze certain significant items, including depreciation and interest expense, that directly affect our net income. We compensate for these limitations by considering the economic effect of the excluded expense items independently as well as in connection with our analysis of net income. NOI should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP, such as total revenues, operating income and net income.

Cash Flows

Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009

A comparison of cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30, — 2010		2009		Change
Net
cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating
activities	$ 50,947		$ 46,982		$ 3,965
Investing
activities	$ (24,072	)	$ 96,452		$ (120,524	)
Financing
activities	$ (106,440	)	$ (86,211	)	$ (20,229	)

Cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were $50.9 million and $47.0 million, respectively, an increase of $3.9 million. The increase primarily relates to a $3.0 million increase in accounts payable activity as a result of the timing of certain payments during the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period and increased NOI levels of $0.6 million during the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period.

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities decreased from $96.5 million in 2009 to ($24.1) million in 2010, a decrease of $120.6 million. The decrease primarily relates to property dispositions resulting in $61.2 million of proceeds in the 2009 period, net proceeds received from the closing of the HART in August 2009 of approximately $48.7 million, with no similar transactions during the 2010 period, as well as higher acquisition activity in the 2010 period (three facilities for an aggregate purchase price of $32.5 million) relative to no acquisitions during the 2009 period. The decrease was offset by repayment of notes receivable of $20.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

25

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='25',FILE='C:\JMS\105684\10-17599-1\task4341467\17599-1-ba-11.htm',USER='105684',CD='Nov 4 02:47 2010'

Table of Contents

Cash used in financing activities increased from $86.2 million to $106.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The increase primarily relates to higher common share issuance activity in the 2009 period compared to the 2010 period (proceeds of $170.9 million and $20.4 million, respectively), and increased distributions paid to shareholders and non-controlling interests of $5.8 million during 2010 as compared to 2009 due to additional outstanding shares during the 2010 period, offset by decreased net debt payoffs of $136.5 million in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period.

Issuance of Common Shares

In April 2009, the Company commenced the sale of up to 10 million common shares pursuant to a continuous offering program. Pursuant to the program, we may sell shares in amounts and at times to be determined by us. Actual sales will be determined by a variety of factors to be determined by us, including market conditions, the trading price of our common shares and determinations by us of the appropriate sources of funding. In connection with the offering program, we engaged a sales agent who receives compensation equal to up to three percent of the gross sales price per common share for any shares sold pursuant to the program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 we sold 2.5 million shares under the program at an average sales price of $8.51 per share resulting in net proceeds of $20.4 million ($30.5 million of net proceeds and 5.0 million shares sold with an average sales price of $6.25 since program inception). We used the net proceeds to fund the acquisition of storage facilities and for general corporate purposes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity Overview

Our cash flow from operations has historically been one of our primary sources of liquidity to fund debt service, distributions and capital expenditures. We derive substantially all of our revenue from customers who lease space from us at our facilities. Therefore, our ability to generate cash from operations is dependent on the rents that we are able to charge and collect from our customers. We believe that the facilities in which we invest — self-storage facilities — are less sensitive than other real estate product types to current near-term economic downturns. However, prolonged economic downturns will adversely affect our cash flows from operations.

In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains, to our shareholders on an annual basis or pay federal income tax. The nature of our business, coupled with the requirement that we distribute a substantial portion of our income on an annual basis, will cause us to have substantial liquidity needs over both the short term and the long term.

Our short term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay operating expenses associated with our facilities, refinancing of certain mortgage indebtedness, interest expense and scheduled principal payments on debt, expected distributions to limited partners and shareholders and recurring capital expenditures. These liquidity needs will vary from year to year, in some cases significantly. We expect recurring capital expenditures remaining in fiscal year 2010 to be approximately $2 million to $4 million. In addition, as of September 30, 2010, our scheduled principal payments on debt, including borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans, are approximately $5.8 million during the remainder of 2010 and $90.5 million in 2011. Subsequent to September 30, 2010, we repaid the YSI 2 mortgage loan of approximately $82.1 million that had a scheduled maturity date of January 11, 2011 with available cash and borrowings from the credit facility. There were no prepayment costs associated with the early repayment of the loan.

Our most restrictive debt covenants limit the amount of additional leverage that we can incur; however, we believe the sources of capital described above will allow us to execute our current business plan and remain in compliance with our debt covenants.

Our liquidity needs beyond 2010 consist primarily of contractual obligations which include repayments of indebtedness at maturity, as well as potential discretionary expenditures such as (i) non-recurring capital expenditures; (ii) redevelopment of operating facilities; (iii) acquisitions of additional facilities; and (iv) development of new facilities. We will have to satisfy our needs through either additional borrowings, including borrowings under a new or revised revolving credit facility, sales of common or preferred shares and/or cash generated through facility dispositions and joint venture transactions.

Notwithstanding the discussion above, we believe that, as a publicly traded REIT, we will have access to multiple sources of capital to fund long term liquidity requirements, including the incurrence of additional debt and the issuance of additional equity. However, we cannot provide any assurance that this will be the case. Our ability to incur additional debt is dependent on a number of factors,

26

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='26',FILE='C:\JMS\105684\10-17599-1\task4341467\17599-1-ba-11.htm',USER='105684',CD='Nov 4 02:47 2010'

Table of Contents

including our degree of leverage, the value of our assets and borrowing restrictions that may be imposed by lenders. In addition, dislocations in the United States debt markets may significantly reduce the availability and increase the cost of long term debt capital, including conventional mortgage financing and commercial mortgage-backed securities financing. There can be no assurance that such capital will be readily available in the future. Our ability to access the equity capital markets is also dependent on a number of factors, including general market conditions for REITs and market perceptions about us.

Current and Expected Sources of Cash Excluding Credit Facility

As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately $23.2 million in available cash and cash equivalents. In addition, we had approximately $250.0 million of availability for borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility.

Bank Credit Facilities

On December 8, 2009, we entered into a three-year, $450 million senior secured credit facility (the “Secured Credit Facility”), consisting of a $200 million secured term loan and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility. The Secured Credit Facility was collateralized by mortgages on “borrowing base properties” (as defined in the Secured Credit Facility agreement). The Secured Credit Facility replaced the prior, three-year $450 million unsecured credit facility, which was entered into in November 2006, and consisted of a $200 million unsecured term loan and $250 million in unsecured revolving loans. All borrowings under the unsecured credit facility were repaid in December 2009.

On September 29, 2010, we amended its existing $450 million credit facility. The amended credit facility consists of a $200 million unsecured term loan and a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The amended credit facility has a three year term expiring on December 7, 2013, is unsecured, and borrowings on the facility incur interest based on a borrowing spread based on the our leverage levels plus LIBOR. We incurred $2.5 million in connection with executing this amendment which was capitalized and is included as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the our consolidated balance sheet.

At September 30, 2010, $200 million of unsecured term loan borrowings were outstanding under the unsecured credit facility and $250 million was available for borrowing under the unsecured revolving credit facility. As of September 30, 2010, borrowings under the unsecured credit facility had a weighted average interest rate of 3.8%.

Our ability to borrow under the amended credit facility is subject to our ongoing compliance with the following financial covenants, including among others:

· Maximum total indebtedness to total asset value of 60.0% at any time;

· Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.50:1.00; and

· Minimum tangible net worth of $821,211,200 plus 75% of net proceeds from equity issuances after June 30, 2010.

Further, under our amended credit facility, we are restricted from paying distributions on our common shares that would exceed an amount equal to the greater of (i) 95% of our funds from operations, and (ii) such amount as may be necessary to maintain our REIT status.

We are currently in compliance with all of our covenants and anticipate being in compliance with all of our covenants through the term of the amended credit facility and unsecured term loan.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements .

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments depend upon prevailing interest rates.

27

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='27',FILE='C:\JMS\eschaeffer\10-17599-1\task4344163\17599-1-ba-13.htm',USER='eschaef',CD='Nov 4 13:22 2010'

Table of Contents

Market Risk

Our investment policy relating to cash and cash equivalents is to preserve principal and liquidity while maximizing the return through investment of available funds. The carrying value of these investments approximates fair value on the reporting dates.

Effect of Changes in Interest Rates on our Outstanding Debt

The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the fair value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market rates. The range of changes chosen reflects our view of changes which are reasonably possible over a one-year period. Fair values are the present value of projected future cash flows based on the market rates chosen.

Our financial instruments consist of both fixed and variable rate debt. As of September 30, 2010, our consolidated debt consisted of $456.2 million in fixed rate loans payable and $200.0 million in a variable rate unsecured term loan. All financial instruments were entered into for other than trading purposes and the fair value of these financial instruments is referred to as the financial position. Changes in interest rates have different impacts on the fixed and variable rate portions of our debt portfolio. A change in interest rates on the fixed portion of the debt portfolio impacts the financial instrument position, but has no impact on interest incurred or cash flows. A change in interest rates on the variable portion of the debt portfolio impacts the interest incurred and cash flows, but does not impact the financial instrument position.

If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase by 1%, the increase in annual interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.0 million a year. If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt decrease by 1%, the decrease in interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.0 million a year.

If market rates of interest increase by 1%, the fair value of our outstanding fixed-rate mortgage debt would decrease by approximately $10.5 million. If market rates of interest decrease by 1%, the fair value of our outstanding fixed-rate mortgage debt would increase by approximately $11.0 million.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table provides information about repurchases of the Company’s common shares during the three month period ended September 30, 2010:

28

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='28',FILE='C:\JMS\eschaeffer\10-17599-1\task4344163\17599-1-ba-13.htm',USER='eschaef',CD='Nov 4 13:22 2010'

Table of Contents

	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)	Average Price Paid Per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
July 1- July 31	—	—	N/A	3,000,000
August 1- August 31	—	—	N/A	3,000,000
September 1- September 30	144	$ 8.78	N/A	3,000,000
Total	144		N/A	3,000,000

(1) Represents common shares withheld by the Company upon the vesting of restricted shares to cover employee tax obligations.

(2) On September 27, 2007, the Company announced that the Board of Trustees approved a share repurchase program for up to 3.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Board of Trustees, the program will expire when the number of authorized shares has been repurchased. The Company has made no repurchases under this program.

29

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='29',FILE='C:\JMS\eschaeffer\10-17599-1\task4344163\17599-1-ba-13.htm',USER='eschaef',CD='Nov 4 13:22 2010'

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.
10.1*	Employment
letter Agreement, dated July 13, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust
and Robert G. Blatz, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 29, 2010
10.2*	Second
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2010,
by and among U-Store-It, L.P., U-Store-It Trust, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
and Banc of America Securities LLC, incorporated by reference to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on
October 4, 2010
12.1	Statement
regarding Computation of Ratios of U-Store-It Trust. (filed here with)
31.1	Certification
of Chief Executive Officer required by
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed here
with)
31.2	Certification
of Chief Financial Officer required by
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed here
with)
32.1	Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished here with)

• Denotes a contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement

30

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='30',FILE='C:\JMS\eschaeffer\10-17599-1\task4344163\17599-1-ba-13.htm',USER='eschaef',CD='Nov 4 13:22 2010'

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES OF REGISTRANT

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	U-STORE-IT TRUST
	(Registrant)
Date:
November 5, 2010	By:	/s/
Dean Jernigan
	Dean
Jernigan, Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal
Executive Officer)
Date:
November 5, 2010	By:	/s/
Timothy M. Martin
	Timothy
M. Martin, Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal
Financial Officer)

31

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='31',FILE='C:\JMS\eschaeffer\10-17599-1\task4344163\17599-1-ba-13.htm',USER='eschaef',CD='Nov 4 13:22 2010'