AI assistant
CROWN CRAFTS INC — Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2010
Jul 29, 2010
34800_rns_2010-07-29_0acba90d-f7fc-456c-a5f0-ca4349921511.zip
Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
DEFA14A 1 d74082d9defa14a.htm DEFA14A defa14a PAGEBREAK
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement o Confidential for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) o Definitive Proxy Statement þ Definitive Additional Materials o Soliciting Material Under § 240.14a-12
Crown Crafts, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required. o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount previously paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
Folio /Folio
PAGEBREAK
For Immediate Release July 29, 2010
CROWN CRAFTS RAISES ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS THAT HAVE GONE UNANSWERED BY THE WYNNEFIELD GROUP
Gonzales, Louisiana Crown Crafts, Inc. (the Company) (NASDAQ-CM: CRWS) today issued a letter to all shareholders in connection with the election of directors at the Companys annual meeting of shareholders to be held on August 10, 2010.
Commenting on the current proxy fight instigated by the New York-based investment fund Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P. and certain of its affiliates (the Wynnefield Group), Zenon S. Nie, independent Lead Director, said, We believe the Wynnefield Groups actions call into question whether they are truly interested in anything other than their own short-sighted, selfish agenda. It appears that theyve deserted their previous handpicked Board candidates because, as informed Crown Crafts fiduciaries, these directors have chosen to support the Companys successful performance and strategic direction. We strongly concur with the objective conclusions of Glass Lewis & Co., a leading independent governance analysis and proxy voting firm, that the Wynnefield Group has offered shareholders no reason to believe that its nominees can develop a plan superior to the one currently employed by management and the Board and that Crown Crafts, contrary to the Wynnefield Groups misleading assertions, has outperformed its peers.
916 S. Burnside Avenue * PO Box 1028 * Gonzales, LA 70707-1028 * (225) 647-9100 * Fax (225) 647-9104
Folio /Folio
PAGEBREAK
The following is the letter the Companys Board sent to Crown Crafts shareholders:
AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
July 29, 2010
Dear Fellow Crown Crafts Shareholders:
In what we regard as deceptive and baseless attacks against the Crown Crafts Board of Directors and management team, Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P. and certain of its affiliates (the Wynnefield Group) have failed to provide something all our shareholders deserve answers .
Your Board has consistently responded to the constructive questions posed by the Wynnefield Group and has maintained open communications with all shareholders over the years. Now its time for the Wynnefield Group to come up with some answers of their own.
How can our shareholders trust that the Wynnefield Groups candidates have the experience and the commitment to act in the interest of all shareholders?
In its proxy statement, the Wynnefield Group has identified two individuals with no relevant industry experience Melvin L. Keating and Jon C. Biro as their candidates. Each has been handpicked by the Wynnefield Group before to serve on boards of other companies in the Wynnefield Groups portfolio. Given the severe losses shareholders of Alliance Semiconductor Corporation suffered under Mr. Keatings watch and Mr. Biros lack of relevant industry experience , we dont believe that either candidate is as qualified as your Board-supported Class I nominees (against whom Messrs. Keating and Biro are running) to serve the best interests of Crown Crafts shareholders. Consider the following facts about your Boards Class I nominees:
| | E. Randall Chestnut joined Crown Crafts in January 1995 and was named President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company in 2001. He has led the
subsequent successful strategic transformation and complete financial turnaround of
the Company. |
| --- | --- |
| | William T. Deyo, Jr. has served the Company as a director since 2001. He
currently serves as Chairman of the Capital Committee of the Board. Like Mr.
Chestnut, he has been with the Company through its remarkable transformation. In
addition to his strong knowledge of the Companys business and extensive corporate
governance experience, Mr. Deyo has a broad-ranging professional background in real
estate and finance, including 33 years in progressive executive positions with
Wachovia Bank. |
| | Richard L. Solar brings extensive industry, financial, M&A, public company and
licensing experience to the Company, including serving as a director and as Chairman
of the Audit Committee of Marvel Entertainment, Inc. until its sale to The Walt
Disney Company in 2009 in a transaction valued at more than $4 billion. From 1996
to June 2002, Mr. Solar served as Senior Vice President, Director and Chief
Financial Officer of Gerber Childrenswear, a publicly-traded infant and childrens
consumer products company. He also co-led the acquisition of the company prior to
its going public and served the company as a consultant from June 2002 to February
2003. |
Folio 2 /Folio
PAGEBREAK
Why is the Wynnefield Group no longer supporting their own prior handpicked Board candidate? Why is its other handpicked Board member not supporting the Wynnefield Group?
Given his ties to the Wynnefield Group, it should be perfectly understandable why the Company did not re-nominate Frederick Wasserman to the Board. The Wynnefield Group has never explained why they did not re-nominate Mr. Wasserman their own handpicked director for re-election this year. We believe it may be because Mr. Wasserman has voted with the majority of the Board more than 92% of the time during his three-year term. We believe that may be the same reason that the Wynnefield Group proposed that we ask their other handpicked Board member, Joseph Kling, who supports our agenda, our strategy and our numbers, to resign from the Board so that they could replace him with another representative of the Wynnefield Group.
What is the Wynnefield Groups strategy to generate sustained, profitable growth for all Crown Crafts shareholders?
In the pages of materials that the Wynnefield Group has sent to shareholders in connection with the spurious and costly proxy battle that they initiated, they have never proposed any strategy designed to create long-term shareholder value as a more prudent alternative to the growth and shareholder value creation strategies that your Board has adopted and your management is successfully executing.
Under your Boards and Mr. Chestnuts proven leadership, the Company has:
| | paid down its debt from $48 million to $5.1 million |
|---|---|
| | avoided catastrophic dilution of our existing shareholders (from 100% to 35%) by |
| eliminating warrants held by our lenders | |
| | bought back almost 1 million shares |
| | completed four accretive strategic acquisitions over the past four years |
| | in fiscal 2010, achieved its highest adjusted EBITDA since 1998 |
| | begun paying a $0.02 per share quarterly cash dividend |
| | seen the Companys stock price climb from a low of $0.09 per share in April 2001 |
| to its current price of $4.22 on July 28, 2010 |
Shareholders should remember that voting the gold proxy card sent by the Wynnefield Group is NOT, and cannot be, a vote for Mr. Chestnut or any other Class 1 nominee of the Company. If you vote the gold proxy card, you cannot vote for Mr. Chestnut or any other Class I nominee of the Company .
Why do the Wynnefield Groups communications with their own investors contradict what they say to Crown Crafts shareholders?
In their first-quarter 2010 report to investors, the Wynnefield Group identifies Crown Crafts as one of the best performers in their portfolio, rising 23.3% in value for the quarter compared with 4.73% for their entire portfolio . But Crown Crafts shareholders would never know this based on the Wynnefield Groups misleading communications to them. The Wynnefield Group repeatedly has cited the brief period in February 2007 a single day when the Companys stock was trading above the $6 level as a benchmark for comparisons. Focusing only on this brief spike in the stock price is like saying that Nashville is currently in a drought because the water level of the Cumberland River is 65% lower than it was when it flooded last May.
It is more relevant to compare the performance of our stock against what the Wynnefield Group claims are our peer companies across a broader range of periods. Further, when you consider that the cost basis of the Wynnefield Groups holdings in the Companys stock is approximately $0.904 per share, the current stock price, along with the $0.02 quarterly dividend, add up to an attractive return on the Wynnefield Groups investment.
Folio 3 /Folio
PAGEBREAK
Why is the Wynnefield Group inconsistent in its objections to the compensation arrangements of the companies in which it invests?
While the Wynnefield Group has objected to the compensation packages of the directors on your Board, to our knowledge it has made no similar objection to the compensation its handpicked directors have received at other companies. In 2009, Mr. Keating received more than $57,000 as a director of White Electronic Designs Corp., more than $40,000 of which was in cash, and one of the Wynnefield Groups principals, Max Batzer, has received annual compensation ranging from $156,000 to $170,000 over each of the past three years for serving as a director of Cornell Companies, Inc., another of the Wynnefield Groups portfolio holdings . Your Board hired a highly regarded, independent, national compensation consultant in its efforts to ensure that compensation is aligned with shareholder interests. We wonder if the Wynnefield Groups other portfolio companies have done the same!
The Wynnefield Group also continues to criticize increased cash compensation paid to our directors during certain of the past few years. However, they fail to note that these increases in cash compensation are brought about by the Wynnefield Groups repeated proxy contests and threats of contests . The Wynnefield Groups antics simply require the Board and its committees to meet much more frequently. Case in point lead director cash compensation decreased from $94,875 in fiscal year 2009 (with the Wynnefield Group having threatened a proxy contest for our 2008 annual meeting of shareholders) to $73,833 in fiscal year 2010 (during which the Wynnefield Group was kept in check by a standstill agreement) a decrease of over 22%.
As always, your Board will listen to any shareholder who has constructive ideas on ways to improve shareholder value, including the Wynnefield Group, and we will answer all questions . Please contact us directly if you have any additional items you would like to discuss.
Your vote is very important to us, no matter the size of your holdings. We urge you to vote your shares today IN FAVOR OF YOUR BOARD-SUPPORTED NOMINEES E. RANDALL CHESTNUT, WILLIAM T. DEYO, JR., SIDNEY KIRSCHNER AND RICHARD L. SOLAR by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card by mailing it in the enclosed pre-addressed, stamped envelope. You can also vote by internet or telephone by following the instructions on the WHITE proxy card. Please do not sign or return any gold proxy card sent to you by the Wynnefield Group as a reminder, you cannot vote the gold proxy card and also vote for our Chief Executive Officer, E. Randall Chestnut, or any other Class I nominee. If you have any questions or need any assistance voting your shares, do not hesitate to contact Georgeson, who is assisting us in this matter, toll free at 1-888-605-7561.
On behalf of the Board of Directors and the dedicated men and women of Crown Crafts, I thank you for your ongoing support.
Sincerely,
Zenon S. Nie Independent Lead Director
Folio 4 /Folio
PAGEBREAK
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
| 1. | To vote FOR your Companys nominees, you MUST execute a WHITE proxy card. |
|---|---|
| 2. | The Board of Directors urges you to DISCARD any gold proxy cards that you may have |
| received from the Wynnefield Group. A WITHHOLD AUTHORITY vote on the Wynnefield Groups | |
| gold proxy card is NOT a vote for the Companys nominees. | |
| 3. | If you have voted on a gold proxy card but wish to support your Companys nominees, |
| please sign, date and mail the enclosed WHITE proxy card in the postage-paid envelope | |
| provided as soon as possible. You can also vote by internet or telephone by following the | |
| instructions on the WHITE proxy card. | |
| 4. | Remember ONLY YOUR LATEST DATED PROXY WILL DETERMINE HOW YOUR SHARES ARE TO BE VOTED |
| AT THE MEETING. | |
| 5. | If any of your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, please |
| contact the party responsible for your account and direct them to vote your shares FOR your | |
| Companys nominees on the WHITE proxy card. |
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please contact our proxy solicitor. 199 Water Street, 26 th Floor New York, NY 10038 Banks and Brokers (212) 440-9800 Shareholders Call Toll Free (888) 605-7561
END OF SHAREHOLDER LETTER
About Crown Crafts, Inc.
Crown Crafts, Inc. designs, markets and distributes infant, toddler and juvenile consumer products, including crib and toddler bedding; blankets; nursery accessories; room décor; burp cloths; bathing accessories; reusable and disposable bibs; and disposable placemats, floor mats, toilet seat covers and changing mats. The Companys operating subsidiaries include Crown Crafts Infant Products, Inc. in California and Hamco, Inc. in Louisiana. Crown Crafts is Americas largest producer of infant bedding, bibs and bath items. The Companys products include licensed and branded collections as well as exclusive private label programs for certain of its customers. The Companys website is www.crowncrafts.com.
Contact:
Olivia Elliott Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 225-647-9124 [email protected]
Folio 5 /Folio
PAGEBREAK
Forward-Looking Statements
The foregoing contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon managements current expectations, projections, estimates and assumptions. Words such as expects, believes, anticipates and variations of such words and similar expressions identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause future results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. These risks include, among others, general economic conditions, including changes in interest rates, in the overall level of consumer spending and in the price of oil, cotton and other raw materials used in the Companys products, changing competition, changes in the retail environment, the level and pricing of future orders from the Companys customers, the extent to which the Companys business is concentrated in a small number of customers, the Companys dependence upon third-party suppliers, including some located in foreign countries, customer acceptance of both new designs and newly-introduced product lines, actions of competitors that may impact the Companys business, disruptions to transportation systems or shipping lanes used by the Company or its suppliers, and the Companys dependence upon licenses from third parties. Reference is also made to the Companys periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for additional factors that may impact the Companys results of operations and financial condition. The Company does not undertake to update the forward-looking statements contained herein to conform to actual results or changes in our expectations, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Folio 6 /Folio