CORAZON MINING LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2022

Dec 14, 2022

==> picture [596 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
15 December 2022
----- End of picture text -----

Additional Information on Spodumene Bearing Pegmatite – Miriam Project in Western Australia

Discovery of pegmatite at surface with high concentrations of spodumene (lithium).

ASX: CZN ABN: 87 112 898 825

REGISTERED OFFICE

Level 3, 33 Ord St, West Perth, WA 6005

PO Box 8187 Subiaco East WA 6008

T : +61 8 6166 6361 E : info@corazon.com.au www.corazon.com.au

Corazon Mining Limited (ASX: CZN) (Corazon or Company) is pleased to provide additional information and cautionary statements regarding the lithium-bearing pegmatite discovered within the Miriam Nickel Sulphide Project (Miriam or Project) in the Eastern Goldfields region of Western Australia, previously announced to the ASX on 8 December 2022.

Initial site reconnaissance by Corazon has discovered widespread indications of pegmatite throughout the Project, including an outcrop hosting abundant large spodumene crystals (Figure 1). The identification of spodumene has been verified using Raman Spectroscopy (explained within Table 1).

The Miriam Project area is covered by extensive thin alluvium and colluvium soils. The outcropping spodumene-bearing pegmatite exists within an old gold prospecting trench. Though the extent of the pegmatite is yet to be defined, there is abundant pegmatitic ‘float’ material throughout the Project area.

Visual descriptions and photos of spodumene provided within should not be used to estimate the lithium content of the pegmatite. Selected samples of the mineralised pegmatite submitted for laboratory analysis will define the lithium content and to some degree identify the effects weathering and alteration has had on the lithium content.

Ongoing work will include exploration to confirm the extent of the lithium mineralisation within the Project area, in tandem with the aggressive nickel sulphide exploration program previously proposed.

The recently acquired Miriam Project is host to the undeveloped Miriam nickel-sulphide deposit, discovered in 1969. The Project is located approximately 10 kilometres southsouthwest of Coolgardie on an ultramafic trend, which also hosts Auroch Minerals’ (ASX: AOU) Nepean Nickel Deposit.

==> picture [114 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

Key Highlights

==> picture [10 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

• Spodumene (lithium) bearing pegmatite has been discovered at Corazon’s Miriam Project located in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia (ASX announcement 8 December 2022)

==> picture [10 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

This announcement presents additional descriptions for the mineralised outcrop and greater context for the information previously provided

==> picture [384 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

1

==> picture [459 x 693] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 - a : Outcrop of spodumene-bearing pegmatite; b, c, d, e, g : Weathered pegmatite with spodumene (“Spd”) crystals; f : sample ‘e’ under UV light; h : sample ‘g’ under UV light.

ASX Announcement | Miriam Lithium Discovery – 15 December 2022

==> picture [384 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [124 x 29] intentionally omitted <==

Spodumene Description

Rock samples of spodumene-rich outcropping pegmatite were extracted from a historical prospecting trench (examples shown in Figure 1). At surface, this pegmatite is weathered and the spodumene is greyish-green in colour, and partially replaced by albite and ultrafine muscovite (alteration and weathering processes). In fresh pegmatite samples, the spodumene is unaltered, yellowish white in natural light and shows orange luminescence color under long wavelength UV light. Spodumene crystals observed are generally 1.5-3 centimetres in width and up to 40 centimetres in length.

==> picture [453 x 476] intentionally omitted <==

– Figure 2 – Proof of Spodumene Plot illustrating Raman spectrum of individual fresh unaltered spodumene crystals (initially identified with ultraviolet light) from the outcrop are consistent with of inclusion-free spodumene reference material (after Ding et al., 2020).

3

ASX Announcement | Miriam Lithium Discovery – 15 December 2022

==> picture [384 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [124 x 29] intentionally omitted <==

Rock samples submitted for analysis have an estimated spodumene content of approximately 5% to 20%. These visual descriptions should not be used to determine the lithium content of the pegmatite. Samples submitted for laboratory analysis are variable in character, with a focus on acquiring information that will identify the effects of alteration and weathering has on the overall lithium content within the pegmatite.

Cautionary statement: Visual estimates should not be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analysis, which are required to determine the grade of the mineralisation, assay results are expected in late December 2022.

More detailed descriptions of the samples submitted for laboratory analysis will be provided with the assay results once received. It is expected the outcrop of pegmatite sampled is a very small representation of the intrusive unit, that appears to strike north-south and can be traced via indications within the soil profile for at least 10 metres. The true dimensions of the pegmatite, or the representativeness of this outcrop for the entire pegmatite, cannot be determined without drilling.

About the Miriam Project

The Miriam Project is located approximately 10 kilometres south-southwest of Coolgardie on a trend of ultramafics best identified by the Miriam and Nepean nickel deposits (Auroch Minerals, ASX: AOU).

The Miriam Project covers an area of about 6 kilometres by 1.5 kilometers and comprises five Prospecting Licence applications (P15/6135 to P15/6139 inclusive). Corazon has acquired the rights to 100% of the Miriam Project (ASX announcement 22 April 2022), with the tenements currently in application status and in the process of being granted.

In 1969, Anaconda Australia Limited discovered the Miriam Deposit, located within the Project, and during the late 1960s and early 1970s conducted most of the known nickel exploration. This work defined the core of the Miriam Deposit over a strike of about 150 meters and to a depth of at least 150 metres below surface. In places, subsequent drilling extended the drilled depth to about 300 metres below surface. The initial defining drill intercepts for the Miriam Deposit included (ASX announcement 26 July 2021):

• 9.6m @ 5.60% Ni

• 12.5m @ 0.56% Ni

• 3.2m @ 2.59% Ni

• 0.9m @ 5.57% Ni

• 6.1m @ 0.90% Ni

Referenced open-file documents (ASX announcement, 26 July 2021) detailing historical work define a nickel-copper endowment for the Miriam Deposit. This work is not compliant with current JORC standards, and further drilling is required for the definition of a JORC resource estimate at the Miriam Project.

Much of the historical drilling which tested the ultramafic sequence north and south of the Miriam Deposit was shallow percussion drilling that did not penetrate the overlying oxidised zone, and many of the holes did not reach the ultramafic footwall target. There is extensive untested opportunity to target nickel sulphide mineralisation at depth and along strike from previous drilling.

More recent nickel exploration campaigns were undertaken at the Miriam Project during the mid-1990’s (Crest Resources NL) and early-mid 2000’s (Berkeley Resources Limited JV’s with MPI and Sipa Exploration NL). This work continued to identify massive and disseminated nickel sulphides, located within or close to well-defined channel sequences.

The existence of this defined target trend will allow Corazon to undertake focused and detailed exploration programs, utilising modern higher-powered electromagnetic (EM) geophysics. Miriam’s most recent geophysical testwork for

4

ASX Announcement | Miriam Lithium Discovery – 15 December 2022

==> picture [384 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [124 x 29] intentionally omitted <==

nickel sulphide exploration was completed in the early 2000’s, where EM proved successful in identifying drill defined mineralisation at the Miriam Deposit.

==> picture [389 x 389] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3 – The Miriam Project location map

==> picture [384 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

This announcement has been authorised by the board of Corazon Mining Limited.

For further information visit www.corazon.com.au or contact:

Brett Smith

Brett Smith James Moses Managing Director Media & Investor Relations Corazon Mining Limited Mandate Corporate P: +61 (08) 6166 6361 M: +61 (0) 420 991 574 E: info@corazonmining.com.au E: james@mandatecorporate.com.au

5

ASX Announcement | Miriam Lithium Discovery – 15 December 2022

==> picture [384 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [124 x 29] intentionally omitted <==

About Corazon

Corazon Mining Limited (ASX: CZN) is an Australian resource company with projects in Australia and Canada. The commodity mix of Corazon’s projects place it in a strong position to take advantage of the growing demand for metals critically required for the booming rechargeable battery sector.

In Canada, Corazon has consolidated the entire historical Lynn Lake Nickel Copper Cobalt Mining Centre (Lynn Lake) in the province of Manitoba. It is the first time Lynn Lake has been under the control of one company since mine closure in 1976. Lynn Lake hosts a large JORC nickel-copper-cobalt resource and presents Corazon with a major development opportunity that is becoming increasingly prospective in line with recent increases in the value of both nickel and cobalt metals, and their expected strong demand outlooks associated with their core use in the emerging global electric vehicle industry.

In Australia, Corazon is exploring the Miriam Nickel-Copper Sulphide Project (Miriam) in Western Australia and the Mt Gilmore Cobalt-Copper-Gold Sulphide Project (Mt Gilmore) in New South Wales.

Miriam is a highly prospective nickel sulphide exploration project, representing a strategic addition to Corazon’s portfolio of nickel sulphide assets.

Mt Gilmore is centered on a regionally substantive hydrothermal system with extensive copper, cobalt, silver and gold anomalism, including high-grade rock chip samples over a strike of more than twenty (20) kilometres. Mt Gilmore also hosts the Cobalt Ridge Deposit - a unique high-grade cobalt-dominant sulphide deposit.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to lithium Exploration Results and Targets is based on information compiled by Dr Ben Li, Member AIG and an employee of Corazon Mining Limited. Dr Li has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Dr Li consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to nickel Exploration Results and Targets is based on information compiled by Mr. Brett Smith, B.Sc Hons (Geol), Member AusIMM, Member AIG and an employee of Corazon Mining Limited. Mr. Smith has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr. Smith consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

This announcement contains certain statements that may constitute “forward looking statement”. Such statements are only predictions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual values, results, performance achievements to differ materially from those expressed, implied or projected in any forward looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. Words such as “expect(s)”, “feel(s)”, “believe(s)”, “will”, “may”, “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding future production, resources or reserves and exploration results. All such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of the Company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (i) those relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits and conclusions of economic evaluations, (ii) risks relating to possible variations in reserves, grade, planned mining dilution and ore loss, or recovery rates and changes in project

6

ASX Announcement | Miriam Lithium Discovery – 15 December 2022

==> picture [384 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [124 x 29] intentionally omitted <==

parameters as plans continue to be refined, (iii) the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies, (iv) risks related to commodity price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, (v) risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or delays in obtaining governmental approvals or in the completion of development or construction activities, and (vi) other risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s prospects, properties and business strategy. Our audience is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date hereof, and we do not undertake any obligation to revise and disseminate forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of or non-occurrence of any events.

The Company believes that it has a reasonable basis for making the forward-looking Statements in the announcement based on the information contained in this and previous ASX announcements.

The Company is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this ASX release, and the Company confirms that, to the best of its knowledge, all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the exploration results in this release continue to apply and have not materially changed.

7

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random	Rock Chip and Float Samples
techniques	chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should	Approximately 18 rock samples were taken from an existing pile of rock historically broken from a pegmatite exposed in a trench/costean (age unknown), possibly associated with past gold exploration/prospecting.
	not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	Total weight of samples is less than 20 kilograms.
		Samples have been geologically logged, examined with ultraviolet light for
		mineral fluorescence and identification, tested with Raman Spectroscopy for
		crystal chemical structure identification and submitted for laboratory element
		analysis.
	Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample	Determination of the mineral spodumene is interpretive and based on
	representivity and the appropriate calibration of any	collaborative supporting data using a number of methods.
	measurement tools or systems used.
		The identification of lithium (and hence conclusive evidence of spodumene) is
		subject to laboratory analysis that has yet to be completed.
		The Project is extensively covered by soil. As such, the extent (size) for the
		pegmatite could not be determined.
	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are	No lithium grades estimations have been provided within this report.
	Material to the Public Report.	Spodumene content of the pegmatite samples collected from outcrop and float
	In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this	are estimated at between 5% and 20%.
	would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling	A detailed description of the rock samples submitted for analysis will be
	was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was	provide with the announcement of assay results.
	pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
	cases more explanation may be required, such as where
	there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
	Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine
	nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information

1

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drilling	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer,	No drilling completed.
techniques	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg
	core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond
	tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
	oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample	No drilling completed.
recovery	recoveries and results assessed.
	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure	No drilling completed.
	representative nature of the samples.	.
	Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and	No drilling completed.
	grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and	Rock samples have been geologically logged and interpreted.
	geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support
	appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies
	and metallurgical studies.
	Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core	Rock sample logging and mineral identification is qualitative and interpretive in
	(or costean, channel, etc) photography.	nature.
	The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections	All have been logged in full.
	logged.
Sub-	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all	No drilling completed.
sampling	core taken.
techniques and sample preparation		Both whole rock samples and cut rock samples have been submitted to the laboratory for analysis.

2

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc	Both whole rock samples and cut rock samples have been submitted to the
	and whether sampled wet or dry.	laboratory for analysis.
	For all sample types, the nature, quality and	Samples submitted for analysis are of adequate size for the analytical methods
	appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	to be undertaken.
		The samples submitted for analysis are representative of the outcrop. Coarse
		grained pegmatites are typically zoned with an heterogenous distribution of
		minerals, with an inherent bias. However, the characteristics of the pegmatite
		sampled, with respect to size and mineralisation, could not be determined and
		will require drilling to define.
	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling	No quality control methods have been implemented by the Company.
	stages to maximise representivity of samples.
		Standard checks and quality control measures are expected to be implemented
		by an accredited third-party laboratory.
	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is	Samples are reconnaissance in nature and the initial test for lithium
	representative of the in situ material collected, including for	mineralisation. The results will not be used for resource estimations.
	instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of	Samples submitted for analysis are of adequate size for the analytical methods
	the material being sampled.	to be undertaken.
Quality of	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and	Samples submitted for analysis are of adequate size for the analytical methods
assay data	laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is	to be undertaken.
and laboratory	considered partial or total.	Analytical methods undertaken will be reported with the results once received.
tests		For rock chip element analysis, samples will be assayed using MS91-PKG
		method by ALS Geochemistry in Perth. Internal standards and blanks will be
		used bythe laboratory. No external standard or blank have been implemented

3

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		by the Company. Standard checks and quality control measures are expected
		to be implemented by an accredited third-party laboratory.
	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF	Selected rock chips collected by Corazon for mineral identification were cut and
	instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the	polished, then analysed by RAMAN spectroscopy at the CMCA, University of
	analysis including instrument make and model, reading	Western Australia. Raman spectroscopy was conducted on a WITec Alpha
	times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.	300RA+ system with an Andor iDUS 401 CCD maintained at -60°C and a			20x
		objective. An infrared (785nm) laser was used with 600mm-1 grating.		The
		Raman map size is 4mm x 4mm.	The mineral identification was conducted by
		comparing the measured Raman	spectra with spectra obtained from
		Spodumene reference materials.	The comparison shows a clear overlap of both
		reference and measured spectra.
		Raman spectroscopy has been widely used to identify minerals within		the	rock
		samples. Raman spectroscopy is a non-destructive method for identifying
		minerals and other materials. The method illuminates a mineral with
		monochromatic light for an illumination duration and a true Raman spectrum is
		determined. The true Raman spectrum data is compared to reference
		spectrums to identify the mineral or material by calculating an identification
		score for each reference Raman spectrum relative to the Raman spectrum data
		of the unknown material using a formula that includes both a coincident-peak
		term and a missing-peak-penalty	term.
		Minerals can have overlapping Raman spectrum response, as such any
		identification of minerals is interpretive and can require collaboration using
		alternate methods.
		Ultraviolet (UV) light has also been used in mineral identification. Spodumene
		can have a fluorescent response to UV light.
	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards,	For rock chip element analysis, samples will be assayed using MS91-PKG
	blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether	method by ALS Geochemistry in Perth. Internal standards and blanks		will	be
	acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision	used by the laboratory. No external standard or blank have been implemented
	have been established.	by the Company. Standard checks and quality control measures are expected
		to be implemented by an accredited third-party laboratory.

4

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Verification	The verification of significant intersections by either	Not applicable to this report. No analytical results reported within.
of sampling	independent or alternative company personnel.
and
assaying
	The use of twinned holes.	Not applicable to this report. No drilling completed.
	Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data	Rock samples have been logged and interpreted by an experienced geologist
	verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.	and recoded digitally within the Company’s databases.
	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	No adjustment to primary assaying has been undertaken.
Location of	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes	The location of the Miriam Project is provided in Figure 3 of this report.
data points	(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.	Detailed sample locations, for samples submitted for laboratory analysis, will be provided once analytical results have been returned.
		The pegmatite sampled is interpreted to strike north-south, centred on
		approximately 6561257m N 319817m E.
	Specification of the grid system used.	GDA 1994 MGA Zone 51 South.
	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	Sample locations have been recorded with a hand-held GPS.
Data spacing	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	Samples have been taken from one small area.
and distribution		Detailed sample locations will be provided once analytical results have been returned.

5

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to	This sampling is reconnaissance in nature and will not result in the immediate
	establish the degree of geological and grade continuity	definition of a mineral resource estimation.
	appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
	estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
	Whether sample compositing has been applied.	There has been no sample composting undertaken.
Orientation	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased	Samples have been taken from one small area and there is no interpretating of
of data in	sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this	trends or continuity provided within the report.
relation to	is known, considering the deposit type.
geological
structure
	If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the	No drilling completed. Samples have been taken from one small area and
	orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to	there is no interpretating of trends or continuity provided within the report.
	have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed
	and reported if material.
Sample	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	Sample have been collected and submitted for analysis by the senior geologist
security		and Competent Person for this report
Audits or	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques	At this stage, no audits or reviews have been conducted by Corazon.
reviews	and data.

6

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	Type, reference name/number, location and ownership	The Miriam Project includes five Prospecting Licences currently in application
tenement and	including agreements or material issues with third parties	status and being progressed towards granting. The outline of the Project is
land tenure	such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,	provided in Figure 1 of the report.
status	native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.	The exploration activities have been completed under conditions specified for a Miners Right and in accordance with heritage agreements currently in place.
		Tenement Application Holder Marked out Received Current Area
		P15/6135 Limelight Industries Pty Ltd 15/01/2017 19/01/2017 193.24 HA
		P15/6136 Limelight Industries Pty Ltd 16/01/2017 19/01/2017 183.17HA
		P15/6137 Limelight Industries Pty Ltd 16/01/2017 19/01/2017 155.43HA
		P15/6138 Limelight Industries Pty Ltd 16/01/2017 19/01/2017 176.46HA
		P15/6139 Limelight Industries Pty Ltd 16/01/2017 19/01/2017 154.56HA
	The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along	Tenements have first in line status for granting. Part of the Project area is
	with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to	covered by the Kangaroo Timber Reserve, as such additional conditions for
	operate in the area.	exploration of the Project are expected for the granted leases.
Exploration	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other	Where exploration has been completed by other parties, those parties have
done by other	parties.	been referenced in this document and a previous announcement dated 26 July
parties		2021.

7

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Key exploration companies include:-
		Anaconda Australia 1969-1977 (the discovery of the Miriam Deposit)
		Crest Resource Limited 1996-1997
		Berkeley Resources Limited joint ventures, including
		MPI early 2000’s
		Sipa Exploration NL 2005-2008
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	Archaean greenstone hosted nickel-copper-cobalt sulphide deposits
		associated with komatiitic channel facies sequences.
		Archaean greenstone hosted hydrothermal (lode) gold deposits.
		Lithium bearing Pegmatitic intrusions associated with Archaean granites.
Drill hole Information	A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the	Not applicable to this report. No drilling undertaken.
	following information for all Material drill holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea
	level in metres) of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception depth
	o hole length.
	If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis	Downhole survey data is not reported within and is not considered material to
	that the information is not Material and this exclusion does	this report.
	not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	Reported mineralised intervals may not be defined as “true widths”. Where possible, information regarding true widths is provided.

8

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Data	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging	No assay results reported within.
aggregation	techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations
methods	(eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
	Material and should be stated.
	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of	All No assay results reported within.
	high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results,
	the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated
	and some typical examples of such aggregations should be
	shown in detail.
	The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent	No assay results reported within.
	values should be clearly stated.
Relationship	These relationships are particularly important in the	No assay results reported within. No interpretation of the extents of the
between	reporting of Exploration Results.	pegmatite has been provided.
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill	Not applicable to this report. No drilling undertaken or reported.
	hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
	If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are	Not applicable to this report. No drilling undertaken or reported.
	reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg
	‘down hole length, true width not known’).
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations	Appropriate diagrams have been included in the announcement.
	of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery
	being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a
	plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate

9

Table 1: Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria

15[th] December 2022

Miriam Nickel Project – Western Australia – Spodumene Identification

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	sectional views.
Balanced	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is	Not applicable to this report. No assay results have been reported.
reporting	not practicable, representative reporting of both low and
	high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid
	misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
Other	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be	Corazon is currently reviewing and collating historical exploration data.
substantive	reported including (but not limited to): geological
exploration	observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical
data	survey results; bulk samples – size and method of
	treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
	potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for	Corazon is currently progressing the Prospecting Licence applications though
	lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-	to grant.
	out drilling).	Work program permit applications under draft, to be submitted upon the grant
		of tenure, include ground geophysical surveys and drilling.
		With regards to the lithium potential of the project, soil sampling is being
		considered as an initial test for the definition of prospective areas, for drilling.
	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible	All relevant diagrams have been presented in this report.
	extensions, including the main geological interpretations and
	future drilling areas, provided this information is not
	commercially sensitive.

10