AI assistant
CONSTELLATION RESOURCES LIMITED — Interim / Quarterly Report 2019
Oct 23, 2018
64701_rns_2018-10-23_19ffa235-b4f4-4b4d-ba33-a0e02eea2d7c.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 24 October 2018
SEPTEMBER 2018 QUARTERLY REPORT
Constellation Resources Limited (“Constellation” or “Company”) is pleased to present its Quarterly Report for the period ended 30 September 2018.
Highlights
-
Constellation successfully listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) with quotation commencing 30 July 2018.
-
The Company is well funded to continue exploration activities on the Orpheus Project in the Fraser range having raised a total of $7 million (before costs) in the initial public offer.
-
The Company holds an interest in several tenements in the Fraser range which are prospective for Nickel and Gold, which are referred to as the Orpheus Project (see location diagram below).
-
The Company has progressed the following work programs during the September quarter:
-
High powered ground electromagnetic (“EM”) surveys over several targets on tenements E28/2403 and E63/1281-2. There remain several targets on E28/1281 to be surveyed which is planned for the current quarter.
==> picture [304 x 243] intentionally omitted <==
Constellation is focused on creating value from the Orpheus Project, in addition to identifying and evaluating new opportunities in the resource sector which have the potential to build shareholder value.
For further information, please contact:
Peter Woodman
Managing Director tel: +61 9322 6322
Level 9 BGC Centre The Esplanade PERTH WA 6000 tel +61 9322 6322 fax +61 9322 6558 email [email protected] ABN 57 153 144 211 constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
Orpheus Project
Constellation manages the Orpheus Project, which comprises five tenements covering approximately 552km² in a prospective portion of the Fraser Range province of Western Australia. The Fraser Range province is considered prospective for nickel, copper and gold, and has attracted significant exploration since the discovery of the Nova deposit in 2012.
The Orpheus Project includes a 70% interest in three mineral exploration licences and one mineral exploration licence application, and a 100% interest in a further mineral exploration licence. The three EL’s form part of a joint venture between Constellation Resources Limited (70%) and Enterprise Metals Limited (30%, ASX: ENT).
Ground EM surveys conducted during the September quarter have covered the various targets mentioned in the previous quarterly report over three of the tenements: E28/2403, E63/1281-2.
E63/1281- Nickel
A 2017 review of the airborne HeliTEM survey identified a conductive anomaly that has the potential to be related to a bedrock mineralised source below the conductive cover. A ground EM survey completed over the HeliTEM anomaly during the quarter returned subtle anomalism that is under review for further work.
==> picture [418 x 296] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: TMI image over E63/1281 showing possible prospective intrusive targets.
A review of the airborne magnetics over E63/1281 has outlined a number of possible prospective mafic intrusions which are displayed as a discrete magnetic lows that cross cut the general NE magnetic orientation (see Figure 1). The interpreted paleochannels (yellow outlines) may mask some of the potential mafic intrusions to historic airborne
Page 2 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
EM and geochemical sampling and therefore they remain an exploration target for nickel/copper mineralisation. Ground EM surveys for some of these targets are planned for the December quarter.
E63/1282-Nickel
During the 2017 review, several HeliTEM targets (B1-5, Figure 2 below) were identified on E63/1282 for Ground EM follow-up. All targets are under shallow cover and any sub crop found was intensely weathered and leached.
Ground EM surveys completed over targets B1-5 during the quarter did not return any anomalism.
==> picture [274 x 277] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: HeliTEM channel 25 Z component B-field data on E63/1282 showing HeliTEM anomalies.
E63/1282 - Gold
This is a ~3km long gold in soil anomaly (up to 13ppb gold) identified from historic sampling associated with a welldefined NE-SW trending magnetic anomaly and follow-up work by Apollo Minerals in August 2017 returned results up to 27ppb gold in soil samples.
Soil sampling in December 2017 was completed over this target on a 100m x 50m E-W grid and has confirmed the presence of the historic gold in soil anomaly, outlining a coherent 500m x 150m gold anomaly in the centre of the sampled area (Figure 3). There are also a number of other anomalous gold in soil areas identified from this survey.
During the quarter, the gold target and surrounding area was inspected and preparations have been made to conduct a heritage survey prior to drilling. Shallow air core drilling traverses over the 500m x 150m anomaly are planned for late 2018 or early 2019.
Page 3 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
==> picture [442 x 313] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Gold in soil results from December 2017 survey on RTP_TMI magnetic image - E28_1282 Gold target. 500m x 150m target highlighted in yellow.
E28/2403 - Nickel
A ground gravity survey was completed over the north eastern portion of E28/2403 by Atlas Geophysics in 2017 for Apollo Minerals. The aim of the survey was to test for positive gravity anomalies that could represent prospective rock types for magmatic nickel-sulphide mineralisation under cover.
The results of the survey were encouraging, with Bouguer gravity anomalies coincident with the circular magnetic feature that constitutes the eastern target zone (Anomaly A1), and over the northern part of the central target zone (Anomaly A2) (Figure 4).
Four regional moving loop electromagnetic (“MLTEM”) test lines were completed during the quarter to cover the strongest parts of the gravity anomalies. Although these test lines did not return any significant anomalism, they did indicate that ground EM was effective in “seeing” to basement and therefore can be used for direct drill targeting for massive nickel sulphides.
Page 4 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
==> picture [470 x 285] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Completed regional MLTEM traverses and local target areas. Background is residual Bouguer Anomaly with residual BA 1VD contours.
Corporate
ASX Listing
Constellation successfully listed on the ASX on 30 July 2018, following the completion of the Company’s IPO. The A$7.0 million raised (before costs) is being directed towards the Company’s exploration programs planned to evaluate the potential of the Orpheus Project in the Fraser Range.
Constellation is in a strong financial position with A$6.3 million at 30 September 2018.
Change of Company Secretary
Mr Lachlan Lynch has been appointed Company Secretary of the Company following the resignation of Mr Clint McGhie effective today. Mr Lynch is a Chartered Accountant, who commenced his career at a large international accounting firm and is currently a Financial Controller for the Apollo Group.
The board would like to thank Mr McGhie for his excellent service to the Company.
Page 5 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT
The information in this report that related to Exploration Results is based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Peter Woodman, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Woodman is a holder of shares and options in, and is the Managing Director of, Constellation Resources Limited. Mr Woodman has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Woodman consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements regarding plans with respect to Constellation’s project are forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that the Company’s plans for development of its projects will proceed as currently expected. These forwardlooking statements are based on the Company’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of the Company, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. The Company makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.
Page 6 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
Appendix 1: Summary of Mining Tenements
As at 30 September 2018, the Company has an interest in the following projects:
| Project Name | Permit Number | Percentage Interest | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fraser Range, Western Australia | E63/1281 | 70% | Granted |
| E63/1282 | 70% | Granted | |
| E28/2403 | 70% | Granted | |
| E63/1695 | 70% | Application | |
| E28/2738 | 100% | Granted |
Page 7 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
Appendix 2: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Fraser Range
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. |
No samples were reported this quarter |
| Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. |
No samples reported this quarter | |
| Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
MOVING LOOP TEM SURVEY Ground-based MLTEM surveys were conducted over selected areas. These surveys were carried out by High Power EM (HPEM) using an HPTX 200A transmitter, GDD Nordic EM24 receiver, and LandTEM SQUID B-field sensor. The primary field was generated by applying a current of 200A to a 300 x 300m transmitter loop. All data were acquired using a Slingram configuration, with the sensor offset 300m from the centre of the transmitter loop. |
|
| Drilling techniques |
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
No drilling results reported. |
| Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. |
No drilling results reported. |
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. |
No drilling results reported. | |
| Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
No drilling results reported. | |
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. |
No drilling results reported. |
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. |
No drilling results reported. | |
| The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
No drilling results reported. |
Page 8 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
No drilling results reported. |
| No drilling results reported. | ||
| No samples reported | ||
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. |
No samples reported | |
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. |
No samples reported | |
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
No samples reported | |
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
No samples reported |
| For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
The data were acquired with a base frequency of 0.5 Hz (500 msec off-time) with 128 stacks. Loop and receiver locations were determined using hand-held GPS with accuracy of around 5m. At least two readings were acquired at each station location to determine the repeatability of the readings. Data was sent to an independent geophysical consultant (Kelvin Blundell) on a daily basis for QA/QC. |
|
| Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
No samples reported | |
| Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. |
No drilling results reported. |
| The use of twinned holes. | No drilling results reported. | |
| Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
No samples reported | |
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | No samples reported. | |
| Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. |
Loop and receiver locations were determined using hand-held GPS with accuracy of around 5m. |
| Specification of the grid system used. | Maps are using the GDA94_MGAz51 grid system. | |
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | Adequate |
Page 9 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | Readings were taken at 100m intervals on regional reconnaissance lines and 50m intervals over specific targets. Where more than one line was acquired, line spacing varied between 150 and 300m. |
| Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
No samples reported. | |
| Whether sample compositing has been applied. | No samples reported. | |
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
Regional reconnaissance lines were acquired in an area with SW- NE magnetic grain, 3D and cross-cutting magnetic bodies, and N-S faults, and the lines were oriented E–W and N–S so as to best cover gravity features of interest. Detailed survey lines were oriented at 90° to the interpreted geological strike. |
| If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
No drilling results reported. | |
| Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. | All MLTEM data is digitally stored by the contractor and geophysical consultant. |
| Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
MLTEM data has been independently checked by geophysical consultant Kelvin Blundell. |
| Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) |
||
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. |
The exploration results in this report relate to Exploration Licences E28/2403, E63/1281 and E63/1282. These three EL’s form part of a joint venture between Constellation Resources Limited (70%) and Enterprise Metals Limited (30%, ASX: ENT). Under the terms of the JV agreement, Constellation Resources is required to sole fund all activities on these tenements until completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study. |
| The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
Tenure in the form of Exploration Licences with standard 5-year expiry dates which may be renewed. There are no known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in this area. |
|
| Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Previous regional exploration on the project was undertaken by various companies and included, geophysical surveys, geochemical surveys, rock sampling and RC and diamond drilling. Historical geophysical surveys included an airborne (helicopter) electromagnetic surveyandground based magnetic, resistivity |
Page 10 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| and gravity surveys. Geochemical surveys included soil sampling. A detailed assessment of the historic data is in progress. No significant issues with the data have been detected to-date. |
||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | The targeted deposit types and styles of mineralisation are nickel- copper-cobalt (Ni-Cu-Co) magmatic sulphide systems such as the Nova-Bollinger deposit and Tropicana style gold mineralisation. |
| Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collaro elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sealevel in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the holeo down hole length and interception deptho hole length. |
No drilling results reported. |
| If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
No drilling results reported. | |
| Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
No sample data reported. |
| Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
No sample data reported. | |
| The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
No metal equivalent values are used. | |
| Relationship between mineralisati on widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
No drilling results reported. |
| If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
No drilling results reported. | |
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Appropriate diagrams are included in the main body of this report. |
| Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and |
Reporting of geophysical results is considered balanced. |
Page 11 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
24 October 2018
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
||
| Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
No additional meaningful and material exploration data has been excluded from this report. |
| Further work | The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). |
Further regional exploration related work planned for the Orpheus Project includes ongoing review of the historical exploration datasets and systematic follow-up geological mapping, rock sampling and geophysical surveys e.g. ground based EM surveys, over identified prospects and exploration targets. Drill testing (air core and/or RC percussion and/or diamond drilling) will be undertaken on priority targets identified. |
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
These diagrams are included in the main body of this report. |
Page 12 of 12
constellationresources.com.au
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
+Rule 5.5
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16
Name of entity
CONSTELLATION RESOURCES LIMITED
ABN
| ABN 57 153 144 211 |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
| 57 153 144 211 | 30 September 2018 |
| Consolidated statement of cash flows | Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (3 months) $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Cash flows from operating activities 1.1 Receipts from customers 1.2 Payments for (a) exploration & evaluation (b) development (c) production (d) staff costs (e) administration and corporate costs 1.3 Dividends received (see note 3) 1.4 Interest received 1.5 Interest and other costs of finance paid 1.6 Income taxes paid 1.7 Research and development refunds 1.8 Other (provide details if material) 1.9 Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
- (103) - - (66) (100) - 8 - - - - |
- (103) - - (66) (100) - 8 - - - - |
| (261) | (261) | |
| 2. Cash flows from investing activities 2.1 Payments to acquire: (a) property, plant and equipment (b) tenements (see item 10) (c) investments (d) other non-current assets |
(4) - - - |
(4) - - - |
- See chapter 19 for defined terms
1 September 2016
Page 1
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
| Consolidated statement of cash flows | Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (3 months) $A’000 |
Year to date (3 months) $A’000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 Proceeds from the disposal of: (a) property, plant and equipment (b) tenements (see item 10) (c) investments (d) other non-current assets 2.3 Cash flows from loans to other entities 2.4 Dividends received (see note 3) 2.5 Other (provide details if material) 2.6 Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
- - - - - - - |
- - - - - - - |
|
| (4) | (4) | ||
| 3. Cash flows from financing activities 3.1 Proceeds from issues of shares 3.2 Proceeds from issue of convertible notes 3.3 Proceeds from exercise of share options 3.4 Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options 3.5 Proceeds from borrowings 3.6 Repayment of borrowings 3.7 Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings 3.8 Dividends paid 3.9 Other (provide details if material): - Loan from parent (forgiven in April 2018) 3.10 Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
7,000 - - (368) - (100) - - - |
7,000 - - (368) - (100) - - - - |
|
| 6,532 | 6,532 | ||
| 4. Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period 4.1 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 4.2 Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) 4.3 Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) 4.4 Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) 4.5 Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held 4.6 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
33 (261) (4) 6,532 - |
33 (261) (4) 6,532 - |
|
| 6,300 | 6,300 |
- See chapter 19 for defined terms
1 September 2016
Page 2
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
| 5. Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Previous quarter $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 Bank balances 5.2 Call deposits 5.3 Bank overdrafts 5.4 Other (provide details) 5.5 Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
38 6,262 - - |
33 - - - |
| 6,300 | 33 | |
| 6. Payments to directors of the entity and their associates Current quarter $A'000 6.1 Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 96 6.2 Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 - 6.3 Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2 |
||
| Current quarter $A'000 |
||
| 96 | ||
| - | ||
| Payments include director fees, superannuation and provision of a fully serviced office. |
| 7. | Payments to related entities of the entity and their | Current quarter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| associates | $A'000 | ||
| 7.1 | Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 | - | |
| 7.2 | Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included | - | |
| in item 2.3 | |||
| 7.3 | Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in | ||
| items 7.1 and 7.2 | |||
| Not | applicable |
| 8. Financing facilities available Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the position Total facility amount at quarter end $A’000 Amount drawn at quarter end $A’000 8.1 Loan facilities - - 8.2 Credit standby arrangements - - 8.3 Other (please specify) - - 8.4 Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well. |
Total facility amount at quarter end $A’000 |
Amount drawn at quarter end $A’000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | ||
| - | - | ||
| - | - | ||
- See chapter 19 for defined terms 1 September 2016
Page 3
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
| 9. Estimated cash outflows for next quarter |
$A’000 |
|---|---|
| 9.1 Exploration and evaluation 9.2 Development 9.3 Production 9.4 Staff costs 9.5 Administration and corporate costs 9.6 Other (provide details if material) 9.7 Total estimated cash outflows |
(240) - - (65) (70) - |
| (375) |
| 10. Changes in tenements (items 2.1(b) and 2.2(b) above) |
Tenement reference and location |
Nature of interest | Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1 Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced |
- | - | - | - |
| 10.2 Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased |
E28/2738 | Direct | - | 100%(1) |
Notes:
- (1) Exploration licence application E28/2738 was granted on 6 July 2018.
Compliance statement
-
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
-
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
-
[lodged electronically without signature]
Sign here: ............................................................ Date: 24 October 2018
(Company secretary)
Print name: Lachlan Lynch
Notes
-
The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.
-
If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
-
Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
-
See chapter 19 for defined terms 1 September 2016
Page 4