CONICO LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2020

Dec 7, 2020

8 December, 2020

ACN 119 057 457

==> picture [37 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

Australian Securities Exchange Annoucement

* UPDATED ***

NEW HIGHLY MINERALISED DISCOVERY AND SUCCESSFUL GRAVITY SURVEY AT MESTERSVIG

HIGHLIGHTS

• Results from the 2020 Mestersvig Project field season have been received;

• Lead results from newly discovered vein reported in CNJ’s ASX Announcement (24 November 2020) reported at >10% have now come back with peak assays of 69.5% lead, 0.91% copper and 282g/t silver;

• Gravity survey covering ~4% of the licence area has highlighted anomalies that are coincident with mineralised trends and represent drill targets for the 2021 field season;

• A review of historic¹ diamond drilling, surface sampling and mapping has revealed multiple targets;

• Licence enlargement has progressed to the next stage; and

• Results for Conico’s Ryberg (magmatic Cu-Ni-Co-Pd-Au) and Sortekap (gold) Projects expected in shortly.

Conico Executive Director Mr Guy Le Page said:

“Mestersvig has seen no systematic exploration efforts since the Blyklippen Mine closed in the early 60’s (past production 545,000 tonnes @ 9.9% Pb, 9.3% Zn). Our first program consisting of only 4 weeks in the field has revealed the immense opportunity of this project to host a substantial highgrade and large tonnage deposit. Our sights are now firmly set on the 2021 drill program.”

SUMMARY

In September 2020, Conico Limited (ASX: CNJ) (“Conico” or “the Company”) conducted its first activities at the 100% owned Mestersvig Pb-Zn-Ag Project in East Greenland (Figure 1). The crew collected ground-borne gravity data, surface samples and conducted a review of on-site facilities and material. The licence area contains the historic Blyklippen Mine that produced 545,000 tonnes @ 9.9% zinc & 9.3% lead, hosted within a vein that varies in width from 2 - 50m.

Surface samples identified a newly mineralised occurrence in the east of the licence area, referred to as the ‘Nuldal Prospect’, with two samples of massive galena collected that grade 60.66% lead, 0.91% copper & 236g/t silver (Sample 4958), and 69.47% lead, 0.77% copper & 282g/t silver (Sample 4959). Historic exploration efforts in this location identified differing mineralisation grading up to 7% copper and 0.4% zinc, further elevating the Nuldal Prospect’s status as a priority target.

¹ Cautionary statement. The historic drill-hole and rock-chip data reported has been collated from historic records held by the Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark (GEUS) in Copenhagen. Conico notes that not original data and procedures have been identified, and some of the reported data is incomplete. As such, Conico intends to use the historic data primarily to guide further exploration. Further details on the data can be found in JORC Table 1 at the end of the document.

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

A ground-borne gravity survey was conducted at priority areas (Blyklippen, Sortebjerg & Nuldal), covering approximately 4% of the Mestersvig licence. The survey was conducted at 200m line spacing and 50m station spacings. The strongest anomaly was once again at the Nuldal Prospect, with a high-density linear feature following along strike of known vein outcrop.

A thorough review of historic data is detailed in this report and includes assay results for: 15 diamond drill-holes at the Sortebjerg Prospect (over a strike length of 2.9km), and 3 diamond drillholes beneath the Blyklippen mine, and surface sampling. Work has begun on creating a 3D model of the historic Blyklippen Mine and Sortebjerg Prospect.

==> picture [286 x 407] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Location map for 2020 field activites.

2

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

NULDAL

Field personnel traversed this vein from the coastline, up the mountainside where outcrop was discovered containing massive galena (lead sulphide), hosted in a quartz vein. Two surface rockchip samples were collected and sent for analysis (table 1, Figure 2).

Sample ID	Easting	Northing	Year	Ag g/t	Cu %	Pb %	S %	Zn %
4958	605,732	8,007,379	2020	236	0.91	60.66	7.32	0.03
4959	605,730	8,007,381	2020	282	0.77	69.47	9.58	0.03

The results are of particular interest as previous explorers collected four surface rock-chip samples2 from the same vein, 200m to the south and identified oxidised sulphides containing significant copper up to 7% (table 2).

The vein also extends to the north into an area referred to as ‘Little Lead Valley’. While no analytical results are present, a report from 1952 states “…several small fissure veins outcrop in the steep western walls of Blyryggen, between 600-700m above sea-level. Some of them contain lead sulphide…”. The total strike length of the ‘Little Lead Valley’ veins and Nuldal combined is 4.5km.

==> picture [162 x 179] intentionally omitted <==

**Sample ID **	Sample Type	Cu%
NG001	Rock chip	0.15
NG002	Rock chip	7.05
NG003	Rock chip	2.9
NG004	Rock chip	1.76

TABLE 2: Assay results for historic (2011) Nuldal surface samples.

Figure 2: Massive galena sampled from the Nuldal Prospect in 2020 (sample 4958).

The gravity survey was extended to the southern extent of the Nuldal Prospect, where the vein becomes obscured by scree. There is a distinct gravity high in this location, showing what appears to be a linear feature that then bends to the southwest and has a strike length of 2km (when combined with the ‘Little Lead Valley’ and Nuldal veins, this gives a total prospective strike length of 6.5km. The gravity anomaly is in an accessible location on flat ground nearby to Mestersvig Bay. Based on these encouraging results, the Company submitted an application to enlarge the Mestersvig licence area, encompassing all of the geology of interest for the Nuldal Prospect.

2 Cautionary statement. The historic drill-hole and rock-chip data reported has been collated from historic records held by the Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark (GEUS) in Copenhagen. Conico notes that not original data and procedures have been identified, and some of the reported data is incomplete. As such, Conico intends to use the historic data primarily to guide further exploration. Further details on the data can be found in JORC Table 1 at the end of the document.

3

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

SORTEBJERG

The Sortebjerg Prospect is located 10km south of the Blyklippen Mine and consists of a mineralised quartz vein that contains dominantly sphalerite (zinc sulphide) mineralisation, with subordinate galena and chalcopyrite (copper sulphide). The vein outcrops at surface in four locations, over a strike length of approximately 2.9km.

The field team focussed on taking surface rock-chip samples for scientific analysis to determine ore genesis, however four samples were also sent for assay and the most anomalous results being 8.35% zinc (sample 4954), and 6.96% copper & 3.42% lead (sample 4956). All samples are shown in Table 3, a photo of the sample location in Figure 3, and sample locations in Figure 5.

**Sample ID **	Sample Type	Cu%	Pb%	Zn%
4954	Rock chip	0.03	0.28	8.35
4955	Rock chip	<0.01	0.01	0.02
4956	Rock chip	6.96	3.42	0.016
4957	Rock chip	0.03	<0.01	<0.01

Table 3: Assay results for 2020 Sortebjerg surface samples.

==> picture [398 x 265] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Outcropping vein at Sortebjerg containing appreciable zinc, copper and lead.

4

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

These samples are further complimented by 15 historic diamond drill holes at Sortebjerg over two campaigns in 1952 and 2011 [3] . These occurred over a strike length of 2.9km with the following notable results (Figure 5):

BH001 5.17m @ 12.58% zinc & 1.77% lead, from 40m downhole BH002 1.55m @ 15.87 zinc, from 122.75m downhole BH003 1.05m @ 7.13% zinc, from 13.15m downhole 4.03m @ 9.11% zinc, 1.28% lead & 0.21% copper, from 51.85m downhole BH010 1.55m @ 18.21% zinc, 7.34% lead & 0.8% copper, from 40.2m downhole BH012 3.1m @ 12.62% zinc, 8.46% lead & 3.04% copper, from 46.15m downhole SB017 2.5m @ 16.11% zinc, from 8.25m downhole SB018 1.0m @ 17.95% zinc & 8.53% lead, from 21.8m downhole SB019

o 1.0m @ 17.33% zinc, from 53.8m downhole

The summary drill results use length weighted average, over a minimum drilled intercept of 1.0m, and a minimum grade of either 1% copper, lead or zinc. Full assay results and collar details are in Appendices 2 and 3.

==> picture [193 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Outcropping vein at Sortebjerg containing sphalerite.

The gravity survey conducted in 2020 covers the northern extent of the Sortebjerg Prospect, including the northern most drill-hole (SB019). There are gravity lows (blue purple) and highs (red) that may represent targets worthy of follow up exploration. It does however appear that the survey does not readily discern a density contrast between the host rock and abundance of sulphide minerals (notably sphalerite: Figure 4) where the vein outcrops, nor where it has been encountered in drilling. This suggests that the survey may be too broadly spaced and higher resolution required in this location.

3 Cautionary statement. The historic drill-hole and rock-chip data reported has been collated from historic records held by the Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark (GEUS) in Copenhagen. Conico notes that not original data and procedures have been identified, and some of the reported data is incomplete. As such, Conico intends to use the historic data primarily to guide further exploration. Further details on the data can be found in JORC Table 1 at the end of the document.

5

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [398 x 565] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Location for Sortebjerg 2020 surface samples, and historic drill collars[4] .

6

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

BLYKLIPPEN

Activities at Blyklippen included the gravity survey and collecting samples of host rock for ore genesis research. An unexpected and welcome discovery was finding the historic mine’s core storage facility that contains surface and underground drill core the mine and surrounds that is remarkably intact (Figure 6). It is the Company’s intention to re-log this core and conduct technical analysis that will aid in understanding ore genesis, and pathfinders for locating additional mineralisation.

==> picture [393 x 263] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: The Blyklippen core storage facility.

The gravity response at Blyklippen has a pronounced gravity low which is likely due to the historic mining operation where the opencut and underground operations removed the mineralised vein.

A review of 2011 historic diamond drilling[4] has been conducted, where three diamond drill-holes were placed beneath the historic mine workings (Figure 7). While the drill-holes did intersect mineralisation, our review has highlighted that they may not have been sufficiently deep to intersect the steeply dipping Blyklippen vein, only intersecting minor parallel vein(s) located prior. This reinvigorates the potential for additional high-grade ore to be discovered at depth.

4 Cautionary statement. The historic drill-hole and rock-chip data reported has been collated from historic records held by the Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark (GEUS) in Copenhagen. Conico notes that not original data and procedures have been identified, and some of the reported data is incomplete. As such, Conico intends to use the historic data primarily to guide further exploration. Further details on the data can be found in JORC Table 1 at the end of the document.

7

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

A summary of the drill-holes is as follows:

• BK001 o No significant intercepts

BK002

• 1.0m @ 3.66% zinc, from 321.9m downhole

• BK003

• 1.4m @ 5.96% zinc & 4.97% lead, from 263.0m downhole

The summary drill results use length weighted average, over a minimum drilled intercept of 1.0m, and a minimum grade of either 1% copper, lead or zinc. Full assay results and collar details are in Appendices 2 and 3.

==> picture [292 x 415] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7: Historic Blyklippen drill collars and traces[4] , relative to mine workings.

8

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

MESTERSVIG PROJECT SUMMARY

==> picture [397 x 265] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 10: Northerly view from the Blyklippen mine, toward the harbour and military base.

HISTORY AND LOCATION

The project area is located in east Greenland, approximately 200km NNW of the nearest settlement at Ittoqqortoormiit. Immediately to the south of the licence area is Greenland Resources’ Malmbjerg molybdenum project, and to the north is Greenfield Exploration & IGO’s Frontier copper project. Adjacent to the Mestersvig Project is the Mestersvig Danish military base, complete with airstrip and harbour.

Between 1956-1962, the Blyklippen Mine produced a total of 545,000 tons of ore grading 9.3% Pb and 9.9% Zn. This was an opencut and underground operation with ore extracted from 3 adits using the cut and fill method, the width of the stopes being the same as the width of the mineralised veins. The mill with all processing facilities (crushing, grinding, flotation, thickeners, filters, drying furnaces), are underground in chambers excavated in the sandstone below the ore body and are still present today. The mill was designed for a daily production of 350 tons ore corresponding to an annual production (11 month) of about 90,000 tons.

MINERALISATION

Mineralisation at Blyklippen is hosted in quartz veins developed along a normal fault, hosted in Permo-Carboniferous sandstones. Thickness of the vein varies from a few metres, up to 50m wide. The mined-out sulphide lens was 2-10m thick, 300 m long and 160 m high. It consisted of 65% quartz, 15% sphalerite, 10% galena, 5-10% baryte with trace amounts of pyrite, chalcopyrite and tetrahedrite.

9

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

For and on behalf of the board,

==> picture [138 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

Guy T Le Page, FFIN, MAusIMM Executive Director

COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT

The information contained in this report relating to exploration results relates to information compiled or reviewed by Thomas Abraham-James, a full-time employee of Longland Resources Ltd. Mr. Abraham-James has a B.Sc Hons (Geol) and is a Chartered Professional (CPGeo) and Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (FAusIMM). Mr. Abraham-James has sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposit under consideration, and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Joint Ore Reserve Committee (JORC) “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr. Abraham-James consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This announcement contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. These statements reflect current expectations, intentions or strategies regarding the future and assumptions based on currently available information. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties materialise, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary from the expectations, intentions and strategies described in this announcement. No obligation is assumed to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, opinions and estimates should change or to reflect other future developments.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

The historic drill-hole and rock-chip data reported has been collated from historic records held by the Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark (GEUS) in Copenhagen. Conico notes that not original data and procedures have been identified, and some of the reported data is incomplete. As such, Conico intends to use the historic data primarily to guide further exploration. Further details on the data can be found in JORC Table 1 at the end of the document.

10

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

• *1: Conico Ltd 2020 gravity survey

• *2: Conico Ltd 2020 surface sampling

• *3: Ironbark Zinc Ltd 2011 surface sampling

• *4: Ironbark Zinc Ltd 2011 diamond drilling

*5: Nordisk Mineselskab A/S 1952 diamond drilling

Criteria	JORC Code Explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	• 1: Ground gravity survey with the following survey details: - 50m spaced stations on 200m spaced lines (2,342 stations) - Scintrex CG5 digital gravity meter and a Lacoste and Romburg G series meter - Leica GS15 RTK DGPS - Accuracy <0.02 mGal - Elevation accuracy <2cm • 2 & 3: Surface reconnaissance rock-chip samples taken from outcrop. • 4 & 5: Diamond drilling for the retrieval of core samples, conducted using industry standard drill rigs.
	Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.	• 1: The data were tide and drift corrected with additional repeat readings taken to establish the survey accuracy. • 2 & 3: Rock-chip samples were chosen based upon geological features relevant to the target mineralisation. • 4 & 5: Drill targets were selected based on geological features relevant to the target mineralisation.
	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	• 1: The gravity survey was chosen as a method for delineating the presence of sulphide mineralisation due to the high density of lead/zinc sulphide relative to host rock lithologies. •2: Rock-chip samples were collected from the field, placed into sample bags, and then submitted to SGS Laboratories, Spain and crushed, split and a portion pulverised to produce a representative sub- sample for analysis by aqua regia digest and Inductively Coupled Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) for the following elements: Ag, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, S, Zn. Follow up analysis was then conducted at SGS Canada Inc., where pulps were delivered by SGS Laboratories Spain, for analysis by borate fusion and XRF for the following element: Pb; and aqua regia digest and Inductively Coupled Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) for the following elements: Ag, Cu, S, Zn. •3: Rock-chip samples were collected from the field, placed into sample bags, and then submitted to ALS Chemex, Sweden and crushed, split and a portion pulverised to produce a representative sub- sample for analysis by four-acid digest and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the following elements: Al2O3, As, CaO, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, MgO, MnO, Ni, Pb, S, SiO2, TiO2, Zn.

December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

		•4: Sample intervals ranged from 0.3m – 1.0m (averaging 0.61m within mineralised zones and 0.85m outside) and were based on logging. - Samples were half core. - Samples were submitted to ALS Chemex, Sweden and crushed, split and a portion pulverised to produce a representative sub-sample for analysis by four-acid digest and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the following elements: Al2O3, As, CaO, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, MgO, MnO, Ni, Pb, S, SiO2, TiO2, Zn. Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) was used for Au & Ag. •5: Sample intervals ranged from 0.11m – 2.03m (averaging 0.68m within mineralised zones and 1.06m outside) and were based on logging. - It is unknown whether half. Quarter, or whole core was submitted for analysis. - Samples from were submitted to Bolidens Gruvaktiebolag’s laboratory in Rönnskärsverken, Sweden. Due to the incomplete nature of the historic drill data and records, including procedures, a comment on the sample representativity system used cannot be made. The data cannot be considered ‘industry standard’ by modern standards. It has been assumed that all reported assays are representative of technology available at the time,but no reliance has beenput on it.
Drilling techniques	Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4: Drilling was conducted using 1x Hydracore HC1800 Diamond coring drill rig. The core diameter is BQ (36.5mm). No orientations were conducted. Down-hole surveys were taken for holes BK001-003 only, using an unknown instrument. • 5: Drilling was via 2 x chuck mounted hydraulic coring diamond drills supplied by Svenska Diamantbergborrnings AB. The hole diameters are 46mm, with some holes reduced to 36mm when casing was required to drill through broken ground. No orientations or down-hole surveys were conducted.
Drill sample recovery	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5: No records of core recovery have been identified from the historic data. - The absence of drill recovery data means that reported grades may be subject to either over or underreporting. No assessment or estimation of these effects has been made due to the lack of data.
	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4: No records of measures to maximise sample recovery have been identified from the historic data. • 5: Reports state that when broken ground or clay was encountered, shorter drill runs were taken (1.5- 2.0m)and the hole was cased usingcasing pipe.
	Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5: Given the absence of core recovery data, it is not possible to assess the potential of a relationship between sample recovery and grade.

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5: Geological logs have been identified for all drill-holes. They include reference to lithology and the presence of visible mineralisation. No geotechnical logs have been identified. The drillhole information reported here is not of a sufficient level of detail to support a Mineral Resource estimation, miningstudyor metallurgical study.
	Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5: All core logging is qualitative. - Core photography has been identified for holes BK001,BK002,BK003,SB017,SB018 and SB019.
	The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5: Geological logs have been identified for all drillholes reported,in their entirety.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4: Core was sawn in half along the drill core axis using a diamond saw. • 5: No details of the sub-sampling or sample preparation techniques have been identified from the historic records, and no supporting sampling procedures have been identified. It is not known whether ¼, ½ or whole core was submitted for analysis.
	If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or _dry. _	• 1,2, 3, 4 & 5: N/A
	For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	• 1: N/A • 2 & 3: Sample preparation comprised industry standard oven drying, crushing, and pulverising. Homogenised pulp material was used for assaying. • 4: The sample preparation technique is judged appropriate for the sample type and mineralisation style being tested. - All core was marked up for sampling by qualified geologists prior to core cutting. Sample widths range from 0.3 to 1.0m. - Sample preparation comprised industry standard oven drying, crushing, and pulverising. Homogenised pulp material was used for assaying. • 5: Due to the lack of available data it is not possible to make comment on the quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique for DD core.
	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.	• 1: N/A • 2: No sub-sampling occurred. • 3, 4 & 5: There is no evidence of sub-sampling havingoccurred.
	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.	• 1: N/A • 2: No field duplicates or second half sampling occurred. • 3, 4 & 5: There is no evidence of duplicate or second half sampling having occurred at either the Nordisk Mineselskab A/S or Ironbark Zinc Ltd drill programmes.
	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	• 1: N/A • 2: Sample weights ranged between 0.5 – 2.5kg, and are deemed appropriate for the mineralisation style. • 3, 4 & 5: sample weights are unknown; therefore, no comment can be made on their appropriateness.

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.	• 1: N/A • 2: Samples were assayed by independent certified commercial laboratories (SGS Laboratories Spain & SGS Canada Inc.). The laboratories are experienced in the preparation and analysis of base and precious metal sulphide ores. Samples were analysed via aqua regia ICP-AES & ICP-OES, which are considered partial. Pb was analysed via borate fusion / XRF which is considered total. • 3 & 4: Samples were assayed by an independent certified commercial laboratory (ALS Chemex, Sweden). The laboratory is experienced in the preparation and analysis of base and precious metal sulphide ores. Samples were analysed via ICP Fusion, which is considered total, and mineralised samples also via aqua regia digest for Ag & Au, which is considered partial. • 5: No descriptions of the assaying and laboratory procedures used have been found. It is not known whether the techniques used arepartial or total.
	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.	•1,2 ,3 ,4 & 5: N/A
	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.	• 1: N/A • 2: Internal laboratory checks were used, and an acceptable level of accuracy was achieved (i.e., 2 standard deviations). • 3 & 4: A certified laboratory standard (GBM906- 15) was submitted together with the samples. The standard came back within acceptable limits (i.e., 2 standard deviations). • 5: No descriptions of quality control procedures adopted by the laboratory, nor any results of any related Quality Control data, has been identified. Therefore, comment on whether acceptable accuracy and precision of results had been established has not been made.
Verification of sampling and assaying	The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.	• 1: N/A • 2: Verification was made by alternative company personnel who viewed the sample photographs and concurred with the presence of visible lead, zinc and copper bearing minerals. • 3, 4 & 5: Due to the historic nature of the results reported, it has not been possible to verify significant intersections. No core from these programmes has been examined by Conico personnel. - Mineralisation evident in core photos from the Ironbark Zinc Ltd drilling correlate with anomalous assayresult intercepts.
	The use of twinned holes.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5: There is no evidence of twinned holes.
	Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.	• 1: N/A • 2: All sample data was recorded on site via notebook and GPS, then transferred to Microsoft Excel spreadsheet at the end of day. Original assay

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

		certificates from the laboratory are digital and have been stored on secure server. • 3 & 4: Annual geological reports and associated assay certificates and core photos are held in digital format, obtained from the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). - Original drill core is stored at Ironbark’s Citronen Project in Greenland. • 5: Information is in digital format only and includes scans of original assay certificates and logs written in pencil at site. Data was obtained directly from the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). • Comment: Conico has stored all drill-hole, rock- chip, assay and geophysical data on a secure server, backed upto the cloud.
	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	• 1: N/A • 2: No adjustments have been made. • 3, 4 & 5:Given the absence of detailed historical information relating to the assay data, no adjustment to the assay data has been made. The data has been reported as it was recorded in the original documentation.
Location of data points	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4: Drill hole collar locations were recorded using a Garmin handheld GPS which has an accuracy of <8m. Down hole survey information is available only for holes BK001, BK002 & BK003, however no information is available regarding the tool used, therefore no comment can be made on its accuracy or quality. • 5: No down hole survey information is available. Drill hole collar locations have been established using historic drill plans and conversion from the local grid used at the time. Due to the historic nature of the data, no comment can be made on its accuracyorquality.
	Specification of the grid system used.	•1, 2, 3 & 4: The Grid System used for all location data points is UTM WGS 84 Zone 26N. • 5: A local grid was used, and historic plans used to convert points into UTM WGS 84 Zone 26N co- ordinates.
	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	•1: Survey elevations established by post processed Kinematic GPS. Topographic corrections used a merged gravity elevation and ALOS DEM dataset. •2: Topographic information was sourced from the Greenland Mapping Project (GIMP) digital elevation model (30m accuracy). • 3 & 4:Topographic information sourced from the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland. • 5: No details on topographic control have been located,therefore no comment can be made.
Data spacing and distribution	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	• 1: N/A • 2, 3, 4 & 5: Surface samples and drill-holes are not located in a grid pattern, they were selected based on specific technical and access controls.
	Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5:The data spacing is not deemed to be sufficient for this criterion. Drill spacing was based on geological criteria and exploratory in nature.

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

	Whether sample compositing has been applied.	• 1: N/A • 2, 3, 4, & 5:No sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5: The orientation of the drilling is approximately perpendicular to the strike and dip of the mineralisation and therefore should not be biased.
	If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	• 1, 2 & 3: N/A • 4 & 5: There are no known biases caused by the orientation of the drill holes.
Sample security	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	• 1: N/A • 2: Samples were taken from the field to storage on site, and then flown to secure storage in Iceland. They were then transported by DHL to Longland Resources Ltd director Thomas Abraham-James in Portugal, who then personally drove them to the laboratory. The samples were then moved internally from SGS Laboratories Spain to SGS Canada Inc. • 3 & 4: Personnel oversaw the samples move from the field to storage on site, to freight to ALS Labs. • 5: No records relating to the sample security have been identified, therefore no comment can be made.
Audits or reviews	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	• 1: N/A • 2, 3, 4 & 5: No audits or reviews of the sampling techniques and data have been undertaken.

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

==> picture [522 x 383] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral Type, reference name/number, location and • The Mestersvig Project is wholly within Mineral
tenement and ownership including agreements or material Exploration Licence 2020/64, located on the east
land tenure issues with third parties such as joint coast of Greenland. It is held 100% by Longland
status ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, Resources Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Conico
native title interests, historical sites, Ltd.
wilderness or national park and • Mineral Exploration Licence 2020/64 lies within
environmental settings. the Northeast Greenland National Park.
The security of the tenure held at the time of • The tenure is secure and in good standing at the
reporting along with any known time of writing. There are no known impediments.
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
Exploration Acknowledgment and appraisal of • The data referenced in this report refers to
done by other exploration by other parties. exploration undertaken by historic mining and
parties exploration companies operating the Project from
1952 to 2011. The previous workers include Nordisk
Mineselskab A/S and Ironbark Zinc Ltd.
• The historic data referenced in this report
includes diamond drilling, surface sampling and
mining.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of • The type is likely that of a Mississippi Valley Type
mineralisation. (MVT) Pb-Zn-Ag deposit where mineralisation has
been re-mobilised by fluids along faults.
Mineralisation is present as massive galena-
sphalerite, with associated chalcopyrite.
Mineralisation is present within quartz-barite veins,
hosted within sandstone and conglomerates.
Known mineralisation is within the fault and vein
systems associated with a Devonian graben system.
Drill hole A summary of all information material to the • Refer to Appendix 2.
Information understanding of the exploration results
16
----- End of picture text -----

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

	including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: - easting and northing of the drill hole collar - elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar - dip and azimuth of the hole - down hole length and interception depth - hole length.
	If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	• This is not the case.
Data aggregation methods	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	•Reported assays in the body of the report have been length weight averaged and use a cut-off of >1% either lead, zinc or copper, over a minimum intercept length of 1.0m. •Assays are reported in their entirety in Appendix 3.
	The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	• Metal equivalents have not been used.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	- These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. - If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. - If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole _length, true width not known’). _	• Due to the absence of the use of orientated core, true widths of the mineralisation reported for the historic drilling data has not been estimated. • Interval widths reported refer to downhole length.
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	• Refer to Figures 1, 5 and 7.
Balanced reporting	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	• All assay data that has been identified is reported in Appendix 3.
Other substantive exploration data	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	• The drill core stored on site is from underground and surface mine development drilling. No details on this drill core have been identified at the time of writing, therefore no comment can be made as to whether it is meaningful. • Regional aeromagnetic data was acquired by the Greenland government and covers the licence area. It was flown at 400m line spacing, and altitude of approximately 300m.

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).	•The Company intends to acquire high-resolution (100m line spacing) aeromagnetic data to have tighter control on fault locations. This is deemed essential due to mineralisation being fault controlled. •Diamond drilling of known targets identified in the gravity survey, surface sampling and historic diamond drillingis alsoproposed to occur.
	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	•Refer to Figures 1, 5 and 7.

18

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 3 - Surface sampling

DETAILS F SURFACE SAMPLING AT THE MESTERVIG PROJECT

Sample ID	Easting	Northing	Year	Ag g/t	Al2O3	As %	CaO %	Co %	Cr %	Cu %	Fe %	Fe2O3 %
4951	597,800	8,012,023	2020	<100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	N.A.	<0.01	N.A.	N.A.
4952	597,800	8,012,025	2020	<100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	N.A.	<0.01	N.A.	N.A.
4953	597,803	8,011,905	2020	<100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	N.A.	<0.01	N.A.	N.A.
4954	601,451	8,002,654	2020	<100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.001	N.A.	0.03	N.A.	N.A.
4955	601,448	8,002,662	2020	<100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.004	N.A.	<0.01	N.A.	N.A.
4956	601,427	8,002,691	2020	<100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	N.A.	6.96	N.A.	N.A.
4957	601,427	8,002,697	2020	<100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.004	N.A.	0.03	N.A.	N.A.
4958	605,732	8,007,379	2020	236	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	N.A.	0.91	N.A.	N.A.
4959	605,730	8,007,381	2020	282	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	N.A.	0.77	N.A.	N.A.
4960	597,645	8,005,944	2020	<100	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	N.A.	<0.01	N.A.	N.A.
NG001	605,901	8,007,165	2011	N.A.	1.37	0.01	<0.05	<0.002	0.04	0.15	3.53	5.04
NG002	605,864	8,007,241	2011	N.A.	0.75	0.01	0.06	0.002	0.14	7.05	8.44	12.05
NG003	605,869	8,007,245	2011	N.A.	1.45	<0.01	0.15	<0.002	0.03	2.90	3.14	4.49
NG004	605,870	8,007,230	2011	N.A.	1.88	<0.01	0.12	<0.002	0.03	1.76	3.15	4.51

Sample ID	Easting	Northing	Year	K %	MgO %	MnO %	Ni %	Pb %	S %	SiO2 %	TiO2 %	Zn %
4951	597,800	8,012,023	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	0.02	<0.1	N.A.	N.A.	0.270
4952	597,800	8,012,025	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	0.17	<0.1	N.A.	N.A.	0.800
4953	597,803	8,011,905	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	<0.01	<0.1	N.A.	N.A.	0.560
4954	601,451	8,002,654	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	0.28	4.1	N.A.	N.A.	8.350
4955	601,448	8,002,662	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.004	0.01	0.1	N.A.	N.A.	0.020
4956	601,427	8,002,691	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.002	3.42	6.0	N.A.	N.A.	0.016
4957	601,427	8,002,697	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.034	<0.01	0.1	N.A.	N.A.	<0.01
4958	605,732	8,007,379	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	60.66	7.32	N.A.	N.A.	0.030
4959	605,730	8,007,381	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	69.47	9.58	N.A.	N.A.	0.030
4960	597,645	8,005,944	2020	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	<0.001	0.05	<0.1	N.A.	N.A.	<0.01
NG001	605,901	8,007,165	2011	0.3	0.07	<0.01	N.A.	81.00	N.A.	88.2	0.04	8.350
NG002	605,864	8,007,241	2011	0.1	0.03	0.07	N.A.	78.00	N.A.	72.0	0.02	0.020
NG003	605,869	8,007,245	2011	0.3	0.04	0.01	N.A.	87.00	N.A.	90.3	0.05	0.016
NG004	605,870	8,007,230	2011	0.4	0.04	0.13	N.A.	82.00	N.A.	91.8	0.13	<0.01

19

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 2 - Collar details

FULL COLLAR DETAILS OF 19 HISTORIC SURFACE DRILL-HOLES AT THE MESTERSVIG PROJECT

Hole ID	Prospect	Company	Year	Easting	Northing	**RL **	**Dip **	**Azimuth **	Depth(m)
BH001	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,944	8,001,753	255	-48	248	167.40
BH002	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,920	8,001,801	255	-45	248	160.90
BH003	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,875	8,001,722	275	-45	248	66.49
BH004	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,839	8,001,763	280	-45	248	67.47
BH005	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	602,146	8,001,190	149	-50	248	92.04
BH006	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,525	8,002,564	190	-50	248	57.11
BH007	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	602,680	8,000,236	30	-55	248	78.30
BH008	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,546	8,002,520	200	-50	248	67.70
BH010	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,575	8,002,478	210	-50	248	82.04
BH012	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,605	8,002,433	220	-50	248	76.09
BH014	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,628	8,002,384	230	-55	248	74.55
BH016	Sortebjerg	Nordisk Mineselskab	1952	601,627	8,002,443	220	-65	248	96.00
BK001	Blyklippen	Ironbark Zinc Ltd	2011	597,800	8,012,381	415	-67	233	396.50
BK002	Blyklippen	Ironbark Zinc Ltd	2011	597,800	8,012,381	415	-57	212	362.00
BK003	Blyklippen	Ironbark Zinc Ltd	2011	598,081	8,011,977	335	-57	264	364.60
BK003A	Blyklippen	Ironbark Zinc Ltd	2011	598,081	8,011,977	335	-55	249	36.00
SB017	Sortebjerg	Ironbark Zinc Ltd	2011	601,451	8,002,671	214	-50	220	47.00
SB018	Sortebjerg	Ironbark Zinc Ltd	2011	601,451	8,002,671	214	-70	220	80.00
SB019	Sortebjerg	Ironbark Zinc Ltd	2011	601,374	8,002,855	245	-70	220	122.00

20

December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 3 - Assay Details

FULL ASSAY DETAILS OF 19 HISTORIC SURFACE DRILL-HOLES AT THE MESTERSVIG PROJECT N.A = Not assayed.

N.R. = No record.

21

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

HoleID	Sample_id	From	To	Type	Al2O3 %	As %	CaO %	Co %	Cr %	Cu %	Fe %	Fe2O3 %	K %
BH001	Nr34	40.00	41.38	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr35	41.38	42.27	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr36	42.27	43.95	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr37	43.95	45.17	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr38	132.52	133.40	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr39	137.30	138.00	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH002	Nr40	122.75	123.60	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH002	Nr41	123.60	124.30	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH002	Nr42	128.75	130.04	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH002	Nr43	130.50	130.85	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr01	13.15	14.20	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr02	17.30	17.45	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr03	17.60	18.10	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr04	21.57	22.52	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr05	51.26	51.50	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr06	51.85	52.83	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr07	52.83	53.20	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.27	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr08	53.20	54.12	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.49	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr09	54.12	55.30	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.26	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr10	55.30	55.80	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH004	Nr11	38.40	38.80	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH004	Nr12	39.48	39.75	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH006	Nr13	33.38	33.60	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.27	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH006	Nr14	35.89	36.10	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.14	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH006	Nr15	36.48	36.60	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH006	Nr16	37.70	38.00	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.19	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH008	Nr17	33.77	34.17	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.49	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH008	Nr18	34.17	34.63	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.17	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr19	40.20	40.95	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.71	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr20	40.95	41.75	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.95	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr21	43.92	44.52	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr22	56.10	58.13	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr23	58.13	59.92	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr24	59.92	61.30	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr25	61.30	61.90	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr26	61.90	62.95	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr27	62.95	64.00	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr28	64.00	65.67	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr29	66.99	67.97	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH012	Nr30	43.16	43.48	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH012	Nr31	46.15	47.55	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	6.6	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH012	Nr32	47.55	48.40	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.21	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH012	Nr33	48.40	49.25	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH016	Nr44	91.01	91.91	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	5.37	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH016	Nr45	92.35	92.45	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	1.93	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BH016	Nr46	94.22	94.74	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.1	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.
BK001	BK001	280.30	280.70	Half BQ	2.88	0.01	1.27	0.002	0.02	0.027	0.32	0.46	0.6
BK001	BK002	287.40	287.80	Half BQ	10.65	0.01	0.11	0.002	0.02	0.015	0.66	0.95	2.3
BK001	BK003	304.60	305.00	Half BQ	2.99	0.01	0.13	0.002	0.02	0.005	0.26	0.37	0.6
BK002	BK004	321.90	322.90	Half BQ	0.69	0.01	0.39	0.002	0.02	0.01	0.2	0.28	0.1
BK003	BK005	263.00	263.30	Half BQ	1.81	0.01	0.38	0.002	0.02	0.005	0.29	0.41	0.4
BK003	BK006	263.30	263.70	Half BQ	4.13	0.01	0.19	0.002	0.02	0.005	0.26	0.37	0.9
BK003	BK007	263.70	264.10	Half BQ	2.37	0.01	2.65	0.002	0.01	0.069	0.32	0.46	0.5
BK003	BK008	264.10	264.40	Half BQ	0.67	0.01	3.25	0.002	0.02	0.021	0.21	0.3	0.1
BK003	BK009	264.40	265.40	Half BQ	8.41	0.01	0.93	0.002	0.02	0.005	0.4	0.58	1.8
BK003	BK010	269.00	269.30	Half BQ	0.38	0.01	30.1	0.002	0.01	0.006	0.66	0.95	0.1
BK003	BK011	289.70	290.40	Half BQ	0.94	0.01	1.73	0.002	0.02	0.013	0.4	0.57	0.2
BK003	BK012	290.40	290.80	Half BQ	2.95	0.01	1.41	0.002	0.02	1.25	1.43	2.04	0.6
BK003	BK013	290.80	291.80	Half BQ	0.97	0.01	1.6	0.002	0.02	0.027	0.53	0.76	0.2
BK003	BK014	296.00	296.40	Half BQ	2.88	0.01	3.03	0.002	0.02	0.627	1.46	2.09	0.6
SB017	SB001	5.80	6.45	Half BQ	6.15	0.01	1.21	0.002	0.01	0.011	0.42	0.6	1.4
SB017	SB002	6.45	7.25	Half BQ	6.58	0.01	1.84	0.002	0.04	0.005	0.44	0.63	1.6
SB017	SB003	7.25	8.25	Half BQ	6.73	0.01	1.86	0.002	0.02	0.006	0.42	0.61	1.5
SB017	SB004	8.25	9.15	Half BQ	2.58	0.01	1.44	0.004	0.01	0.088	0.63	0.9	0.6
SB017	SB005	9.15	9.75	Half BQ	3.06	0.01	3.84	0.002	0.03	0.03	0.46	0.65	0.7
SB017	SB006	9.75	10.75	Half BQ	0.59	0.01	0.1	0.004	0.02	0.081	0.51	0.74	0.1
SB017	SB007	10.75	11.75	Half BQ	8.81	0.01	0.55	0.004	0.02	0.006	0.58	0.83	1.9
SB018	SB008	6.40	6.90	Half BQ	5.13	0.01	0.62	0.004	0.02	0.059	0.92	1.32	1.2
SB018	SB009	20.80	21.80	Half BQ	11.15	0.01	4.68	0.002	0.01	0.005	3.58	5.11	2.3
SB018	SB010	21.80	22.80	Half BQ	2.21	0.01	0.56	0.007	0.02	0.016	0.49	0.7	0.5
SB018	SB011	22.80	23.80	Half BQ	11.7	0.01	0.37	0.007	0.02	0.005	1.02	1.45	2.6
SB019	SB012	53.00	53.80	Half BQ	9.15	0.01	1.17	0.002	0.02	0.005	0.54	0.77	1.8
SB019	SB013	53.80	54.30	Half BQ	1.37	0.01	0.09	0.005	0.02	0.049	0.51	0.73	0.3
SB019	SB014	54.30	54.80	Half BQ	4.65	0.01	0.83	0.003	0.02	0.005	0.71	1.01	1
SB019	SB015	54.80	55.60	Half BQ	6.03	0.01	1.11	0.002	0.02	0.005	0.94	1.35	1.5
SB019	SB017	60.70	61.10	Half BQ	1.14	0.01	1.2	0.002	0.02	0.137	0.39	0.55	0.2
SB019	SB018	61.80	62.10	Half BQ	0.51	0.01	0.15	0.003	0.02	0.109	0.43	0.61	0.1
SB019	SB019	84.20	84.60	Half BQ	1.03	0.01	8.72	0.003	0.02	0.047	0.83	1.19	0.2

8 December, 2020

==> picture [36 x 36] intentionally omitted <==

HoleID	Sample_id	From	To	Type	MgO %	MnO %	Ni %	Pb %	S %	SiO2 %	TiO2 %	Zn %	Aug/t	Ag g/t
BH001	Nr34	40.00	41.38	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.02	1.7	N.A.	N.A.	2.33	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr35	41.38	42.27	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	10.2	12.4	N.A.	N.A.	29.9	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr36	42.27	43.95	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.02	0.2	N.A.	N.A.	2.74	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr37	43.95	45.17	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.02	14.4	N.A.	N.A.	25.1	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr38	132.52	133.40	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.2	11.5	N.A.	N.A.	21.7	N.A.	N.A.
BH001	Nr39	137.30	138.00	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	9.71	N.A.	N.A.
BH002	Nr40	122.75	123.60	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.02	1.7	N.A.	N.A.	2.5	N.A.	N.A.
BH002	Nr41	123.60	124.30	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.03	16.6	N.A.	N.A.	32.1	N.A.	N.A.
BH002	Nr42	128.75	130.04	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.03	0.3	N.A.	N.A.	0.23	N.A.	N.A.
BH002	Nr43	130.50	130.85	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.02	0.6	N.A.	N.A.	0.6	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr01	13.15	14.20	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	3.3	N.A.	N.A.	7.13	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr02	17.30	17.45	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	4.6	N.A.	N.A.	9.56	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr03	17.60	18.10	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	6.8	N.A.	N.A.	14.1	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr04	21.57	22.52	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.02	3.3	N.A.	N.A.	7.15	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr05	51.26	51.50	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	5	N.A.	N.A.	10	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr06	51.85	52.83	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0	1	N.A.	N.A.	1.71	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr07	52.83	53.20	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	4.16	1	N.A.	N.A.	0.75	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr08	53.20	54.12	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	3.84	6.7	N.A.	N.A.	10.7	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr09	54.12	55.30	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.05	4.3	N.A.	N.A.	7.95	N.A.	N.A.
BH003	Nr10	55.30	55.80	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.02	14	N.A.	N.A.	26.8	N.A.	N.A.
BH004	Nr11	38.40	38.80	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	2.8	N.A.	N.A.	8.08	N.A.	N.A.
BH004	Nr12	39.48	39.75	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	2.3	N.A.	N.A.	4.62	N.A.	N.A.
BH006	Nr13	33.38	33.60	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	2.8	N.A.	N.A.	4.07	N.A.	N.A.
BH006	Nr14	35.89	36.10	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	17.8	N.A.	N.A.	33.1	N.A.	N.A.
BH006	Nr15	36.48	36.60	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	14.5	N.A.	N.A.	26.9	N.A.	N.A.
BH006	Nr16	37.70	38.00	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	4.44	7.6	N.A.	N.A.	13.1	N.A.	N.A.
BH008	Nr17	33.77	34.17	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	3.8	N.A.	N.A.	5.37	N.A.	N.A.
BH008	Nr18	34.17	34.63	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	7.1	N.A.	N.A.	13.7	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr19	40.20	40.95	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	4.39	7.9	N.A.	N.A.	11.6	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr20	40.95	41.75	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	10.1	17	N.A.	N.A.	24.4	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr21	43.92	44.52	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.03	8.4	N.A.	N.A.	15.7	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr22	56.10	58.13	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.07	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr23	58.13	59.92	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.15	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr24	59.92	61.30	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.55	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr25	61.30	61.90	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.16	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr26	61.90	62.95	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.09	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr27	62.95	64.00	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.14	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr28	64.00	65.67	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.95	N.A.	N.A.
BH010	Nr29	66.99	67.97	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.09	N.A.	N.A.
BH012	Nr30	43.16	43.48	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	19	18.4	N.A.	N.A.	29.4	N.A.	N.A.
BH012	Nr31	46.15	47.55	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.89	12.2	N.A.	N.A.	8.98	N.A.	N.A.
BH012	Nr32	47.55	48.40	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	1.57	4	N.A.	N.A.	6.35	N.A.	N.A.
BH012	Nr33	48.40	49.25	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	27.8	18.4	N.A.	N.A.	24.9	N.A.	N.A.
BH016	Nr44	91.01	91.91	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	0.03	6.6	N.A.	N.A.	1.98	N.A.	N.A.
BH016	Nr45	92.35	92.45	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	1.35	17.5	N.A.	N.A.	26.2	N.A.	N.A.
BH016	Nr46	94.22	94.74	N.R.	N.A.	N.A.	N.A.	1.17	6.9	N.A.	N.A.	12	N.A.	N.A.
BK001	BK001	280.30	280.70	Half BQ	0.14	0.03	0.005	2.33	3.26	58.2	0.12	0.02	0.01	4.2
BK001	BK002	287.40	287.80	Half BQ	0.31	0.01	0.005	1.29	0.54	71.3	0.64	0.02	0.01	1.3
BK001	BK003	304.60	305.00	Half BQ	0.07	0.01	0.005	0.01	0.8	85.5	0.15	1.52	0.01	0.2
BK002	BK004	321.90	322.90	Half BQ	0.01	0.01	0.005	0.01	1.79	84.8	0.02	3.66	0.01	0.2
BK003	BK005	263.00	263.30	Half BQ	0.09	0.01	0.005	1.05	2.98	78.2	0.07	5.03	0.01	1.9
BK003	BK006	263.30	263.70	Half BQ	0.14	0.01	0.005	0.01	0.37	62.7	0.22	0.69	0.01	0.2
BK003	BK007	263.70	264.10	Half BQ	0.08	0.05	0.005	16.2	9.72	36.8	0.12	14.45	0.02	20.9
BK003	BK008	264.10	264.40	Half BQ	0.01	0.06	0.005	0.53	2.77	37.4	0.04	2.6	0.01	2
BK003	BK009	264.40	265.40	Half BQ	0.22	0.02	0.005	0.11	0.75	74.1	0.39	0.44	0.01	0.5
BK003	BK010	269.00	269.30	Half BQ	0.17	0.21	0.005	1.46	1.43	33.8	0.03	2.42	0.01	1.4
BK003	BK011	289.70	290.40	Half BQ	0.19	0.02	0.005	0.01	0.17	87	0.04	0.25	0.01	0.2
BK003	BK012	290.40	290.80	Half BQ	0.17	0.02	0.005	0.03	1.52	79.5	0.12	0.51	0.01	3.7
BK003	BK013	290.80	291.80	Half BQ	0.29	0.03	0.005	0.01	0.5	83.5	0.04	0.92	0.01	0.3
BK003	BK014	296.00	296.40	Half BQ	0.66	0.05	0.005	0.66	0.96	78.1	0.12	0.09	0.01	3.4
SB017	SB001	5.80	6.45	Half BQ	0.26	0.01	0.005	0.01	0.26	83.3	0.3	0.46	0.03	8.1
SB017	SB002	6.45	7.25	Half BQ	0.27	0.01	0.005	0.05	0.17	83.5	0.34	0.14	0.01	0.6
SB017	SB003	7.25	8.25	Half BQ	0.25	0.02	0.005	0.05	0.22	82.7	0.34	0.14	0.01	0.8
SB017	SB004	8.25	9.15	Half BQ	0.21	0.01	0.005	0.01	9.55	62.6	0.14	19.75	0.01	3.7
SB017	SB005	9.15	9.75	Half BQ	0.19	0.02	0.005	0.01	0.2	85.3	0.12	0.18	0.01	0.2
SB017	SB006	9.75	10.75	Half BQ	0.04	0.01	0.005	0.01	11.2	62.3	0.02	22.4	0.01	4.2
SB017	SB007	10.75	11.75	Half BQ	0.41	0.01	0.008	0.05	0.2	75.2	0.45	0.1	0.01	0.2
SB018	SB008	6.40	6.90	Half BQ	0.18	0.01	0.005	0.01	6.19	65.1	0.21	11.45	0.01	5.4
SB018	SB009	20.80	21.80	Half BQ	2.08	0.1	0.005	0.02	0.42	57.1	1.63	0.28	0.01	0.2
SB018	SB010	21.80	22.80	Half BQ	0.2	0.01	0.019	0.22	8.53	63.2	0.12	17.95	0.01	4.2
SB018	SB011	22.80	23.80	Half BQ	0.59	0.01	0.008	0.12	0.33	68.1	0.58	0.02	0.01	0.7
SB019	SB012	53.00	53.80	Half BQ	0.25	0.01	0.005	0.11	0.51	74.1	0.47	0.45	0.01	0.4
SB019	SB013	53.80	54.30	Half BQ	0.02	0.01	0.005	0.01	15.65	44.1	0.06	32.88	0.02	4.9
SB019	SB014	54.30	54.80	Half BQ	0.2	0.01	0.006	0.01	1.29	79.7	0.2	1.77	0.01	0.6
SB019	SB015	54.80	55.60	Half BQ	0.16	0.02	0.005	0.05	0.82	80.6	0.24	0.03	0.01	0.3
SB019	SB017	60.70	61.10	Half BQ	0.07	0.02	0.005	2.03	0.58	84.9	0.04	0.19	0.01	7.1
SB019	SB018	61.80	62.10	Half BQ	0.02	0.01	0.005	0.01	2.88	78.8	0.02	5.65	0.01	2.8
SB019	SB019	84.20	84.60	Half BQ	0.39	0.07	0.005	0.01	6.57	55.3	0.05	13.35	0.01	5.7