Annual Report (ESEF) • Dec 18, 2023
Preview not available for this file type.
Download Source FileTogether Driving growth
Compass Group PLC, the parent company of the Group, is a non-trading investment holding company which derives its distributable reserves from dividends paid by subsidiary companies. Our strategic focus on People, Performance and Purpose continues to underpin all that we do in our ambition to deliver value to all our stakeholders and drive sustainable growth together.
| Underlying operating profit growth | 30% |
| Statutory operating profit growth | 26% |
| Organic revenue growth | 22% |
| Statutory revenue growth | 6.1% |
| Underlying operating margin | 6.8% |
| Statutory operating margin | (1) Measured on a constant-currency basis. Alternative Performance Measure (APM) (see pages 206 to 213) APM which is also a Key Performance Indicator (see page 7) The Group’s APMs are defined in note 34 (non-GAAP measures) and reconciled to GAAP measures in notes 2 (segmental analysis) and 34 to the consolidated financial statements. |
A global leader in food services
At a glance
| Business & Industry | Sports & Leisure | Education | Defence, Offshore & Remote | Healthcare & Senior Living |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35% | 18% | 24% | 15% | 8% |
| Food services | Support services |
|---|---|
| 85% | 15% |
We are focused on food and targeted support services in around 35 countries. While our core offer is the provision of outsourced food services across the world in certain sectors, we also supply targeted support services, such as hospital cleaning. New business growth is currently benefiting from an increase in first-time outsourcing due to additional operational complexities and inflationary pressures.
| Underlying revenue by sector | Underlying revenue by region |
|---|---|
| North America 67% | |
| Europe 23% | |
| Rest of World 10% |
Alternative Performance Measure (APM) (see pages 206 to 213). Underlying revenue is defined as revenue plus share of revenue of joint ventures. Statutory revenue in 2023 is £31.0 billion. The Group’s APMs are defined in note 34 (non-GAAP measures) and reconciled to GAAP measures in notes 2 (segmental analysis) and 34 to the consolidated financial statements.
We utilise our scale, experience and digital capabilities to offer our clients attractive cost benefits, tailored menus and a wide range of innovative dining solutions that can add flexibility to their operating models.
We strive to provide healthy, balanced meals right through the learning journey, from nursery to higher education. Our catering solutions come in multiple formats, from traditional onsite dining to vending and delivery or takeaway options.
We work directly with healthcare providers to prepare food that improves patient and senior living experiences – from restaurant-style cafés to in-room patient dining and specialist feeding.
We have vast catering experience within this market, providing food, beverages and hospitality across large stadiums, conference venues, museums and galleries.
We are a leader in providing food and support services to many major oil, gas, mining and construction companies. Our clients rely on us to provide uninterrupted support, however challenging the operating conditions.
2023 was another year of significant progress for Compass. As well as delivering strong financial results, the Group continued to develop its digital and sustainability propositions, with a particular focus on food waste.
We provide food and support services across five market sectors
We get close to clients and consumers by sectorising and sub-sectorising our businesses, allowing us to deliver bespoke, innovative and cost effective solutions to meet their unique needs and create maximum mutual value.
Sustainability Report
In January, Compass published its Sustainability Report entitled ‘Our Planet Promise’. The report outlined how the Group is tackling climate change, fighting food waste and ensuring food is sourced responsibly, whilst operating with the highest levels of integrity and strong governance.
The Compass Group Foundation
The Compass Group Foundation was launched in January with a mission to improve people’s lives through the advancement of education and training, empowering them to play a key role in the future of food for their communities. By providing grants to non-profit organisations in countries where Compass operates, it aims to create inclusive job opportunities, empower local suppliers, and to provide urgent support in the case of global emergencies.
Strong first-half results and share buyback
In May, the Group published strong first-half results, raising its full-year guidance and announcing a further share buyback of up to £750 million. Net new business continued to be excellent, and significantly higher than the historical rate. There was a step change in our performance in Europe, as the region benefited from growth initiatives and favourable outsourcing conditions.
Sustainability Deep Dive
Compass presented a virtual deep dive on its sustainability proposition in September, highlighting the progress we have made with clients, consumers, employees and suppliers in finding collective solutions to meet our commitment to climate net zero by 2050. As well as being better for the planet, our sustainability focus is also contributing tangible commercial benefits, helping the Group to win new business.
Another excellent year for Compass
In November, the Group announced its full-year results. 2023 was another excellent year for Compass as it continued to benefit from broad-based growth, with revenue and margin improving across all its regions. New business signings increased to a record £2.7 billion and the Group’s client retention rate continued to improve to 96.5%.
Our Vision
Underpinned by our robust health and safety culture, and doing what is right (See pages 12 to 14)
Our Enablers
Digitisation
Digital is a right to entry in almost every client proposal and a clear growth enabler. It also unlocks cost savings and enhances our sustainability proposition.
Diversity
Compass is committed to inclusion for all and endeavours to harness the talents of its diverse workforce across every level of the business.# Strategic Report
The Group was the first in its industry to set a global climate net-zero target and aims to be carbon-neutral in its own operations by 2030.
We use the Management and Performance (MAP) framework to drive performance across the Group. This discipline ensures businesses are managed efficiently while continuing to delight clients and consumers with innovative, healthy and exciting food service solutions. People are at the heart of who we are and what we do. Compass is uniquely positioned to create lifetime opportunities and to positively impact and represent the communities in which its businesses operate. See page 32, See page 38, See page 15.
Compass continually seeks ways to be more socially and environmentally responsible. Our purpose continues to drive innovation and collaboration across the Group as partnerships with clients, business partners and local communities are strengthened.
To be a world-class provider of contract food services and support services, renowned for our great people, our great service, and our great results.
We use our Management and Performance (MAP) framework to drive performance across the business. It is a simple framework embedded in our culture, which ensures all employees are focused on meeting the following performance drivers:
Food makes up around one-third of our costs. In addition to the benefits of our scale in food procurement, we are able to manage food costs through careful menu planning and by rationalising the number of products we buy and the suppliers we buy them from.
In-unit costs are predominantly made up of labour. We focus on getting the right people in the right place at the right time. By using labour scheduling techniques and improving productivity, we are able to deliver the optimum level of service in the most efficient way.
We have a simple organisational model with few layers of management and little bureaucracy, which enables us to keep overheads low whilst we continue to grow revenue.
MAP 1 is about winning new business and retaining our existing clients. We invest in sales and retention and are increasingly sectorising and sub-sectorising the business around the world to allow us to get closer to our clients.
Like-for-like revenue consists of both volume and price. We are focused on attracting and satisfying our client base with strong consumer propositions.
Food is our focus and our core competence. We take a pragmatic and targeted approach to support services on a country and sector specific basis. We create value through organic growth, improving margins and targeted investment.
Our people are the heart of our business. Energetic, ambitious and entrepreneurial, they deliver amazing food and hospitality to millions of consumers worldwide.
Our sectorised approach is a key differentiator. Our businesses create bespoke solutions using extensive knowledge of their clients’ requirements.
We strive to provide clients and consumers with greater choice, award-winning innovation and market-leading contemporary food offers.
Our scale enables our businesses to pass on purchasing benefits to clients and consumers by offering better quality products at more attractive prices. Spending with local and diverse suppliers and social enterprises enables greater reinvestment into social causes.
The Group operates on a decentralised basis, enabling an entrepreneurial approach by local management teams. This is supported by our MAP framework, which standardises business processes and increases efficiency.
A strong financial foundation with a low level of leverage means we can invest in growth, enabling our businesses to innovate their offer, and evolve our operating model. Our financial strength also attracts new clients seeking stability and long-term outsourcing solutions.
Compass is a strong cash-generating business with a clear capital allocation model. We invest both organically and through acquisitions to drive growth. Our policy is to pay around 50% of underlying earnings through an ordinary dividend, with further additional shareholder returns when appropriate. We do this whilst maintaining a resilient balance sheet, targeting net debt to EBITDA in the range of 1x-1.5x. Consistent with this framework is the return of excess capital to shareholders through share buybacks. See page 20 for more information.
We track our progress against a mix of financial and non-financial measures, which we believe best reflects the delivery of our strategy. We measure growth, efficiency and shareholder returns, which are all underpinned by our focus on safety and our impact on the environment.
| Financial KPI | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Organic revenue change | 18.8% | Organic revenue growth was strong at 18.8% reflecting balanced net new business growth across our regions, higher pricing and base volume recovery during the first half of the year. |
| Underlying operating margin | 6.8% | Underlying operation margin improved by 60bps to 6.8% as the Group benefited from operational leverage. |
| Underlying free cash flow | £1,241m | Underlying free cash flow increased to £1,241 million in 2023 representing a conversion rate of 58.5% of underlying operating profit. |
| Underlying basic earnings per share | 86.1p | Earnings per share growth of 36.7% in 2023 reflected the Group’s strong revenue growth and the improvement in underlying operating margin. |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) | 19.5% | ROCE of 19.5% improved in the most part due to the increase in underlying operating profit during 2023. |
| Global Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate | 1.98 | Lost Time Incident Rate further improved to 1.98 reflecting continued focus on loss prevention and return to work initiatives across our regions. |
| Global Food Safety Incident Rate | 0.15 | Our focus on Global Food Safety has led to a reduced rate of incidents on a 5-year basis (down 25%), despite our business having grown significantly since 2019. |
| Greenhouse gas intensity ratio (GHG) | 6.4 tCO2e/£m | When normalised by revenue we have seen a 12% year-on-year reduction in our GHG emissions ratio. |
Organic revenue change
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
23 22 21 20 19
18.8% 37.5% (6.3)% (18.8)% 6.4%
Underlying operating margin
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
23 22 21 20 19
6.8% 6.2% 4.5% 2.9% 7.4%
Underlying basic earnings per share
0 20 40 60 80 100
23 22 21 20 19
86.1p 63.0p 29.5p 18.6p 85.2p
Global Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
23 22 21 20 19
1.98 2.27 2.33 2.55 2.91
Underlying free cash flow
0 300 600 900 1200 1500
23 22 21 20 19
£1,241m £890m £660m £213m £1,247m
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
0 5 10 15 20
23 22 21 20 19
19.5% 15.8% 8.7% 4.7% 19.5%
Global Food Safety Incident Rate
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
23 22 21 20 19
0.15 3 0.14 0.20 0.21 0.22
Dear Shareholder,
I am pleased to report that Compass has delivered yet another year of strong progress, both in terms of revenue growth and margin improvement. The outsourcing market remains buoyant, driven by macroeconomic pressures, such as heightened inflation, and increasing operational complexity as consumers demand a more sophisticated food service offering, with digital and sustainability being the key drivers of growth.
Our people are at the heart of who we are and what we do. Our aim is to provide a culture in which our people thrive and feel valued for who they are and what they bring to Compass. They drive the business forward and make Compass a great place to work. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all our people for their hard work, dedication, and commitment to the business.
The Group delivered excellent organic revenue growth of 18.8%¹ and underlying operating margin increased by 60bps compared with the prior year to 6.8%¹. This resulted in underlying operating profit increasing by 29.6%¹ on a constant-currency basis to £2,122 million¹. On a statutory basis, revenue increased by 21.6% to £31,028 million and operating profit was up 26.1% to £1,891 million.# Shareholder returns
The Board recognises the importance of shareholder returns and has been rewarding investors through dividends and share buybacks. Our policy is to pay out around 50% of underlying earnings through an interim and final dividend. In line with this policy, the Board has declared a final dividend of 28.1 pence per share, which, when added to the interim dividend, provides a total dividend for the year of 43.1 pence. We also provided additional capital returns through the year in the form of share buybacks.
Our strategy is to focus on food, with targeted support services. The addressable food services market is estimated to be worth at least $300 billion, with a significant structural growth opportunity from first-time outsourcing, as around half of the market is still self-operated. We have a strategic focus on People, Performance and Purpose. These pillars underpin all that we do in our ambition to deliver value to all our stakeholders.
Our Planet Promise is the Group’s global commitment to a sustainable future for all. It encompasses our values as an ethical, sustainable, and inclusive business, together with our ambition to positively impact the world. As well as being the right thing to do, this mission is also key to our growth aspirations as sustainability is also a priority for many of our clients.
As your Chair, one of my key responsibilities is to ensure good governance (see pages 56 to 126), and I continue to be well supported by my fellow Board members. As previously announced, after a career of nearly 40 years at Compass, Gary Green will retire as Group Chief Operating Officer, North America and as a director of Compass Group PLC on 30 November 2023. Gary will be succeeded by Palmer Brown, Group Chief Financial Officer, who joined Compass 22 years ago and has spent most of his working career in North America in a variety of senior finance, strategy, and legal roles. In turn, Palmer will be succeeded by Petros Parras, Regional Finance Director for Europe and the Middle East, who joined the business in January 2020.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank Gary for his enormous contribution to Compass and offer him our best wishes for a very happy retirement. I would also like to extend the Board’s congratulations to Palmer and Petros on their appointments to their new roles.
Carol Arrowsmith will retire from the Board at the conclusion of the 2024 AGM having served more than nine years on the Board. On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank Carol for her considerable contribution as a non-executive director and for her leadership and stewardship of the Remuneration Committee. I would also like to offer Carol our best wishes for the future. More details of all of these changes can be found in the Nomination Committee Report on pages 93 to 96.
The Group continued to perform strongly in 2023 both in terms of growth and margin. We are successfully capitalising on the significant structural growth opportunities, particularly in first-time outsourcing, as we leverage our scale and expertise to achieve strong new business wins. Compass is a fantastic business with a clear strategy and significant growth potential. We look forward to continuing our journey and generating further sustainable long-term value for all our stakeholders.
Ian Meakins
Chair of the Board
20 November 2023
Ian Meakins
Chair of the Board
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires the directors to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of the members as a whole, having regard to the interests of stakeholders in their decision making. The Company’s section 172 statement is set out on page 80 and is incorporated into this Strategic report by reference.
The addressable global food services market is worth at least $300 billion, of which Compass has less than 15% market share. This provides us a significant runway for growth, as nearly three-quarters of the market is still self-operated or in the hands of regional players. In addition, there are further growth opportunities for Compass in vending, selected areas of food delivery, and targeted support services. The drivers for outsourcing are also growing, due to increased regulation, operational complexity and inflationary pressures.
c. $300bn addressable global food services market
| Market review | Structural growth opportunity |
|---|---|
| Large players | |
| Regional players | Compass Group |
| Self-operated |
| ##### Growth driver | Recent trends | How we are responding |
|---|---|---|
| Inflation | Inflation remains heightened, particularly in Europe, increasing first-time outsourcing opportunities as self-operators seek cost efficiencies. | Compass mitigates the impact of inflation using operational tools such as menu management, utilising our scale in food procurement, and digital innovation. In addition to mitigating cost pressures, our businesses work closely with clients to price appropriately. |
| Regulation | More onerous health and safety regulation, such as allergen labelling, which larger players such as Compass are better placed to deal with. | Compass has long recognised the importance of accurate allergen information, increasingly using technology to provide up-to-date ingredient and allergen information for all dishes prepared and served. |
| Digital | Increased demand for convenience, for example through the use of pre-order and pre-payment methods. | We have been investing in digital for a decade now and have strong in-house capability that allows our businesses to create a bespoke digital offer for their clients. Digital is also enabling our businesses to increase penetration and average transaction values as well as reducing food costs and increasing labour efficiencies. |
| Sustainability | Clients require bespoke solutions that take account of their specific sustainability commitments. | We pride ourselves on being an ethical and responsible Group, as demonstrated by our ambitious global climate net zero commitment. This is supported by our countries setting their own ambitious climate commitments. Our focus on sustainability has been key to winning new business and retaining clients, and we expect this trend to continue. |
| Consumer experience | Improving the variety of menus and quality of food service propositions. | We are elevating the role of the chef, for example through our Global Culinary Forum which brings together chefs representing all our regions. By creating a more inclusive culture our businesses can attract and develop more diverse talent as well as introduce more authentic food experiences to their consumers. Increasing the involvement of front line teams better motivates our people and also drives better commercial outcomes. |
Dominic Blakemore
Group Chief Executive Officer
2023 was a strong year for Compass. North America continued its long track record of excellent growth whilst Europe delivered a second year of net new growth in the 4-5% range. During the year, we continued to successfully capitalise on the dynamic outsourcing trends, resulting in another record year of new business wins and continued strong client retention. We have a strong, balanced, and sustainable growth model across the Group. Our size, strength and scale enable us to continue investing in our operating model, further enhancing our competitive advantages. We have exited nine tail countries to focus on markets with the greatest growth opportunities and our strong cash generation continues to fuel investment in our business through capex and attractive M&A. The business is in great shape operationally and financially and well positioned for a more focused growth phase.
The Group continues to perform strongly both in terms of organic revenue growth, which was 18.8% 1, and underlying operating margin, which improved by 60bps to 6.8% 1. As a result, underlying operating profit grew by 29.6% 1 on a constant-currency basis to £2,122 million 1 (2022: £1,637 million). Statutory revenue increased by 21.6% reflecting the strong trading performance and favourable exchange translation. Statutory operating profit, including charges relating to business acquisitions and reshaping our portfolio which are excluded from underlying operating profit, increased by 26.1% to £1,891 million.
Capital expenditure was 2.9% 1 of underlying revenue and net M&A expenditure was £304 million, which was largely spent on several bolt-on acquisitions, mainly in the US and UK. Subsequent to the year-end, the Group agreed to acquire Hofmann Menü-Manufaktur GmbH, a German producer of high-quality cook and freeze meals, and exited its small operations in Argentina and Angola. As a result of this and other disposals, including five countries in Central and Eastern Europe, Compass has further reduced its countries of operation to c.35 as it focuses on significant opportunities in its core markets.
Cash flow remains excellent, with underlying operating cash flow of £1,825 million 1 (2022: £1,351 million) and underlying free cash flow of £1,241 million 1 (2022: £890 million), representing strong conversion rates of 86.0% 1 and 58.5% 1, respectively. As a result, leverage (net debt to EBITDA) reduced further to 1.2x 1. Our strong balance sheet provides us with flexibility to invest in future growth, where we continue to see exciting opportunities, both in terms of M&A, where we have an attractive pipeline, and organically, where the market remains buoyant.We therefore expect capital expenditure to be around 3.5% of underlying revenue in 2024, with net M&A expenditure likely to be higher than in 2023.
We are a global leader in the provision of food services, our core offer, complemented by our targeted support services business. Our addressable food market is estimated to be worth at least $300 billion, in the markets and sectors we currently operate in, with about half of the market still operated in-house. Heightened client and consumer expectations and inflation have contributed to the acceleration of growth, particularly in the conversion of first-time outsourcing, and we have clear strategic priorities to capture these opportunities. Our portfolio of sector-specific brands enables us to differentiate our offer and leverage our industry expertise by creating tailored solutions for our clients to align with their own organisational priorities. This approach helps us become strategic partners to our clients with shared objectives across a range of initiatives, such as digital capability, sustainability, people development and increasingly as a trusted advisor. Through our strategic pillars of People, Performance and Purpose, combined with our operational performance and capital allocation framework, we aim to generate higher compounding value for all our stakeholders over the long term.
At Compass, we know that our success is largely down to the skills and ingenuity of our chefs and front line teams. They lead the way in safe and sustainable food at scale, promoting healthier choices and creating great experiences for the people we serve. We work to ensure that people who want to pursue a career in the food and hospitality industry can succeed with Compass. We encourage new joiners to make use of innovative tools, such as digital onboarding applications and training programmes, with more than 1,500 colleagues in our UK & Ireland business signing up to our landmark training and development scheme, Compass Career Pathways. Pleasingly, over 50% of those who have completed the programme have moved or been promoted into a new role. Having people from diverse backgrounds in Compass is a huge strength for our businesses. In the US, over 17,000 Compass employees completed diversity, equity and inclusion training, whilst our Be the Difference conference in July 2023 was attended by more than 2,000 colleagues to discuss empowering front line talent, exploring neurodiversity and the importance of allyship. We are also addressing inequalities and opportunity gaps within the hospitality industry by supporting women chefs with dedicated training, leadership development programmes and advancement opportunities. Our Women in Culinary (WiC) programme in the US is driving cultural change as well as career growth, igniting executive allyship and fostering kind kitchens.
Our Planet Promise is Compass Group’s global commitment to a sustainable future for all. It encompasses our values as an ethical, sustainable and inclusive business, together with our ambition to positively impact the world. Compass is committed to be carbon neutral worldwide on its Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 2030, and reach climate net zero GHG emissions across its global operations and value chain by 2050. Our ability to demonstrate progress in reducing our carbon impact and food waste is helping us to attract new clients for whom sustainability is a major focus. Most have their own ambitious climate plans and they rely on us as a trusted partner to help them achieve their sustainability goals. Together with Compass, clients and consumers in every market can navigate towards a less wasteful, healthier plant-forward lifestyle. Reducing food waste is one of the biggest environmental challenges facing our sector, and therefore one where we have the greatest potential to make a significant difference. Our culinary teams and front line staff are instrumental in tackling this challenge, employing a range of diverse food waste reduction technology systems across our markets. This year, we made food waste reduction our top priority. Our target was to adopt food waste tracking technology in 6,000 locations and, with every region united in support, we achieved nearly 8,000 locations.
Performance this year has been pleasing across our key metrics of revenue, profit and cash. Favourable market conditions, persistent inflation and our flexible operating model continued to support strong balanced net new business growth across all our regions, with first-time outsourcing accounting for c.50% of new wins. Our large addressable market has a long structural runway for growth and, with increasing complexity and heightened expectations from clients and consumers, we expect to sustain growth higher than our historical average. We have clear strategic priorities to capture these exciting opportunities by focusing on our core markets and evolving our operating model. Strong profit growth and cash generation underpin our robust balance sheet giving us options for capital allocation. The total dividend for the year of 43.1 pence is complemented by a share buyback of up to $500 million (£410 million), subject to M&A activity, in line with our recent returns to shareholders. As we continue to create value from disciplined capital allocation, we continue to explore attractive M&A opportunities to capture future sources of growth. Looking further ahead, we remain excited about the significant global structural growth opportunities, leading to revenue and profit growth above historical rates. With our proven model of value creation through operations and capital allocation, we will continue rewarding shareholders with compounding returns over the long term.
Dominic Blakemore
Group Chief Executive Officer
20 November 2023
Through our strategic pillars of People, Performance and Purpose, combined with our operational performance and capital allocation framework, we aim to generate higher compounding value for all our stakeholders over the long term.
At Compass safety is our number one operational priority. Our collective values and practices promote education and collaboration with a focus on continuous improvement. People are at the heart of our business so taking care of them is of the utmost importance to us.
As our business continues to grow, so does our investment in safety management systems. Compass’ safety platforms are structured to manage risk and enhance operational performance. Investment in systems provides a proactive approach to compliance, operational efficiency, data-driven decisions and leadership safety interactions. At Compass, safety performance is continuously monitored, transparently reported and considered at every meeting of the Board and Corporate Responsibility Committee.
Our safety culture emphasises the fundamental importance of incident prevention and intervention. Through awareness, information and training, we empower our people to take individual and collective responsibility for their own safety and the safety of those around them. This is further embedded by our network of safety leaders operating at every level within our businesses. In 2023, our global Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate (LTIFR) fell to 1.98, below the limit of 2.60 set at the beginning of the year. There has been a 34% reduction in incident numbers compared to the 2019 baseline.
Compass’ core values and safety protocols guide the decisions, actions and behaviours of our people and serve as a foundation for the way our businesses operate. Suppliers undergo a rigorous approval process, with any areas for improvement remedied to mitigate wider risks. An increasing number of our businesses’ sites operate to ISO 22000 food safety management system standards or similar Safe Quality Food (SQF) standards. Food safety training is delivered at the local level to account for unique market risks associated with food hygiene and allergen regulations. We take a robust approach to any food safety incidents, with protocols in place to report and respond rapidly. Learnings are shared internally to continually evaluate and improve practices. In 2023, we achieved a Food Safety Incident Rate (FSIR) rate of 0.15, below our limit of 0.20. Our focus on Global Food Safety has led to a reduced rate of incidents on a 5-year basis (down 25%), despite our business having grown significantly since 2019.
We continue to diligently focus on a culture of care, respect and safety; empowering our people to adopt behaviours that keep them free from harm while delivering for clients and consumers. Safety learnings are shared right across the business with a safety moment at the start of management meetings, whilst Board and Executive Committee meetings regularly feature health and safety updates. The Corporate Responsibility Committee reviews the Group’s Health and Safety Policies annually to ensure that they continue to reflect our aims and aspirations and remain fit for purpose.
The practice of transparently reporting safety performance encourages a culture of accountability and contributes to continuous improvement in safety practices. Countries are required to report monthly on their LTIFR and FSIR.These key performance indicators are linked to the annual bonus plan for executive directors and other senior management. See page 116 of our Remuneration Committee report for more information. Our safety performance against targets continued to improve in 2023. Since 2019, we have delivered a 34% reduction in the LTIFR and a 25% reduction in the FSIR respectively. A reduction in LTIFR correlates with an improving safety culture; reducing cases where our colleagues are away from work for more than a shift as a result of a work-related injury. A reduction in FSIR is a helpful measure of our ability to provide quality food that is safe to our consumers, as measured by cases of substantiated food safety incidents. See our KPIs on page 7 for more information. Priorities for the year ahead The business will prioritise initiatives that further a holistic safety culture; one of those initiatives is the move to measuring personal injury rates focusing on Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) rather than LTIFR for 2024 onwards. TRIFR emphasises the importance of preventing all injuries and is a more comprehensive assessment of personal safety, reflecting the continuing maturity of our organisation. We will look to further scale technologies that support the safeguarding of our people, enable better practice sharing around training, and provide a forum for our global safety professionals to connect in a common purpose.
Compass has a passionate commitment to uphold the highest standards of ethics and integrity (E&I) which has earned us our position as a global leader and trusted partner. We believe in responsible leadership; we aim to set the standard and act as a role model for ethical behaviour. Through an inclusive culture, we promote a workplace where our people and partners can speak up and be heard. Our values, commitments and Code of Business Conduct (CBC) guide the decisions, actions and behaviours of our people and serve as a foundation for the way our businesses conduct themselves.
Our risk-based programme and policy framework provide the minimum standards, expectations and guidance for Compass’ employees and those who act on our behalf, to ensure business is conducted in an ethical, fair and responsible way.
Committed to continued improvement, this year we have prioritised:
– refreshing and relaunching our CBC
– launching our Business Integrity Policy
– introducing an annual E&I awareness week, focused on embedding E&I principles within our countries through a leader-led approach
– strengthening integrity due diligence, with the introduction of a new Third-Party Integrity Due Diligence process, piloted in 10 countries
– improving governance and management reporting through phased implementation of E&I committees
– supporting further embedding of Compass’ Human Rights Policy through programme awareness activities and e-learning
Through communication, awareness and training, we empower, encourage and equip our people to spot red flags and make well- informed integrity-driven decisions. This year, we expanded our Group-wide target training population to include all Legal, Sales, Finance, Internal Audit, Procurement, Growth and Retention teams in addition to our Board of Directors and all executive management, leader and above-unit manager roles at Group, region and country level. Our global E&I awareness week involved all our countries, targeting an audience of over 100,000 employees across the Group’s businesses, and resulted in 6,500 participants electing to become E&I ambassadors. To set clear expectations of our ethical behaviours and values, we refreshed the new starter training programme for unit managers and above, covering key E&I principles. Following a successful pilot, a phased implementation plan for the new starter training has commenced and will continue into 2024.
To confirm understanding of and compliance with the CBC, our annual self-certification process requires all our target training population of around 18,000 employees globally (2022: around 13,000) to provide a pledge and declaration covering key business integrity risk areas and conflict of interest disclosures.
In partnership with the businesses and our community of E&I leaders, we will prioritise our initiatives in accordance with our strategic plan as approved by the Corporate Responsibility Committee. These priorities include continuing to embed third-party integrity due diligence as part of local country processes, improving management of high-risk third parties, enhancing monitoring and oversight procedures, and optimising our E&I suite of tools and technologies.
* Employees who were assigned E&I training
"Speak Up, We’re Listening" is our confidential reporting programme that is accessible to anyone, available 24/7 365 days a year and is managed by Group E&I, a team independent of any other lines of business. In 2023, our "Speak Up, We’re Listening" programme received a total of 4,130 reports (2022: 3,176), from employees in the Group, contractors and external parties. Positive engagement with the programme is observed through increased reporting, and accessibility through the use of QR codes which are displayed on key policies and other communications materials such as posters. In 2023, the QR code was scanned 7,713 times across 38 countries. Of the total reports made to "Speak Up", 1,386 involved issues that were non-ethics-related matters and were typically referred to internal teams for follow-up rather than requiring an ethics investigation. The remaining 2,814 were ethics-related matters assessed as potential breaches of our CBC of which 80% (2,243) were employee behaviour concerns, 14% (398) business integrity, 5% (132) health, safety and sustainability, and 1% (41) finance. Whilst 62% (1,735) of reporters elected to remain anonymous (2022: 1,268), the overall substantiation rate for 2023 was 38% (2022: 34%), which reflects optimisations in investigation processes including more consistent engagement with reporters to develop and better understand concerns raised. At Compass, we take all matters raised through "Speak Up" very seriously and ensure our reporters hear back from the programme, and that appropriate actions are taken with respect to concerns raised. In 2023, the four most common case outcomes relating to substantiated issues were coaching (37%) feedback (33%), warning (13%) and termination of employment (7%). Other outcomes (10%) included referral to another process, training and employee performance improvement. Compass Group and all of its Group companies strongly encourage raising concerns about improper behaviour or possible violations of our CBC, other policies or laws. Compass strictly prohibits and does not tolerate retaliation or detrimental conduct in response to anyone raising a concern, irrespective of the outcome. In a 2023 integrity pulse survey, 87% of our employees* stated that they speak up when things do not feel right.
*5 most frequently reported ethics issues:
* harassment/bullying
* workplace conflict
* issues with management
* discrimination
* retaliation
In descending order of most frequently reported
| Ethics report categories | Quantity |
|---|---|
| Ethics reports | 2,814 |
| Non-ethics | 1,316 |
| Outcome Category | Percentage | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| Substantiation Rate | 38% | |
| Coaching | 37% | |
| Feedback | 33% | |
| Warning | 13% | |
| Termination of employment | 7% | |
| Referral to another process; training; employee performance improvement | 10% |
With the majority of the food services market still self-operated or in the hands of regional players, the outsourcing opportunity in Europe remains significant. We are capitalising on this potential, with net new business growth in Europe now much higher than our historical rate. This reflects both higher new business wins and an improving retention rate. A stronger growth mentality is being embedded in our European business which is benefiting from investments made in its people, brands, and processes. We are being more proactive in our approach to winning new business and retaining clients, which has resulted in a larger sales pipeline, increased conversion rates and better retention rates. Largely driven by this step change in Europe performance, we now expect the Group’s net new business growth rate to be sustained in the 4-5% range, above our historical level of around 3%.
– Revenue increased by 21.6% reflecting the strong trading performance and favourable exchange translation
– Operating profit, including charges relating to business acquisitions and reshaping our portfolio which are excluded from underlying operating profit, increased by 26.1% to £1,891 million
– Basic earnings per share of 75.4 pence, an increase of 20.4%
– Operating profit growth of 29.6% on a constant-currency basis delivered through: organic revenue growth of 18.8%, balanced across all regions and sectors; and operating margin of 6.8%, up 60bps year on year
– Return on capital employed of 19.5%, up from 15.8% in 2022
– Basic underlying earnings per share increased by 32.5% to 86.1 pence on a constant-currency basis
– Increased cash generation, with underlying free cash flow up 39.4% to £1,241 million
Continuing our track record of strong growth
Palmer Brown
Group Chief Financial Officer
| Metric | 2023 £m | 2022 £m | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Underlying | |||
| – reported rates | 31,281 | 25,771 | 21.4% |
| – constant currency | 31,281 | 26,406 | 18.5% |
Group performance
We manage and assess the performance of the Group using various underlying and other Alternative Performance Measures (APMs). These measures are not defined by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or other generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and may not be directly comparable with APMs used by other companies. Underlying measures reflect ongoing trading and, therefore, facilitate meaningful year-on-year comparison. The Group’s APMs, together with the results prepared in accordance with IFRS, provide comprehensive analysis of the Group’s results. Accordingly, the relevant statutory measures are also presented where appropriate. Certain of the Group’s APMs are financial Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) which measure progress against our strategy. The Group’s APMs are defined in note 34 (non-GAAP measures) and reconciled to GAAP measures in notes 2 (segmental analysis) and 34 to the consolidated financial statements.
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statutory | Adjustments | Underlying | Statutory | Adjustments | Underlying | |
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| Revenue | 31,028 | 253 | 31,281 | 25,512 | 259 | 25,771 |
| Operating profit | 1,891 | 231 | 2,122 | 1,500 | 90 | 1,590 |
| Net gain/(loss) on sale and closure of businesses | 20 | (20) | – | (7) | 7 | – |
| Finance costs | (164) | 28 | (136) | (24) | (76) | (100) |
| Profit before tax | 1,747 | 239 | 1,986 | 1,469 | 21 | 1,490 |
| Tax expense | (429) | (52) | (481) | (352) | (13) | (365) |
| Profit for the year | 1,318 | 187 | 1,505 | 1,117 | 8 | 1,125 |
| Non-controlling interests | (4) | – | (4) | (4) | – | (4) |
| Attributable profit | 1,314 | 187 | 1,501 | 1,113 | 8 | 1,121 |
| Average number of shares | 1,743m | – | 1,743m | 1,779m | – | 1,779m |
| Basic earnings per share | 75.4p | 10.7p | 86.1p | 62.6p | 0.4p | 63.0p |
| EBITDA | 2,964 | 2,371 |
Alternative Performance Measure (APM) (see pages 206 to 213)
APM which is also a Key Performance Indicator (see page 7)
Statutory income statement
On a statutory basis, revenue increased by 21.6% to £31,028 million (2022: £25,512 million). Statutory operating profit was £1,891 million (2022: £1,500 million), an increase of 26.1%, mainly reflecting the higher revenue and margin improvement, together with favourable exchange translation. Statutory operating profit includes non-underlying item charges of £231 million (2022: £90 million), including acquisition-related charges of £125 million (2022: £92 million) and charges related to the strategic portfolio review of £99 million (2022: £nil) reflecting the impact of site closures and contract renegotiations and terminations in the UK. A full list of non-underlying items is included in note 34 (non-GAAP measures). The Group has recognised a net gain of £20 million on the sale and closure of businesses (2022: net loss of £7 million), including exit costs of £11 million (2022: £7 million), which largely relates to the strategic portfolio review. As a result of this ongoing review of non-core activities, the Group exited seven tail countries and sold a non-core business in the UK during the year. Subsequent to the year-end, the Group also exited its businesses in Argentina and Angola. Finance costs increased to £164 million (2022: £24 million) due to an increase in interest rates, the cost of the additional debt issued in September 2022 and a partial reversal of the fair value gains on derivatives held to minimise volatility in short-term underlying finance costs recognised in the prior year. Profit before tax was £1,747 million (2022: £1,469 million) giving rise to an income tax expense of £429 million (2022: £352 million), equivalent to an effective tax rate of 24.6% (2022: 24.0%). The increase in rate primarily reflects the increase in the UK corporate tax rate from 19% to 25% from 1 April 2023 and the impact of non-taxable non-underlying items, partly offset by the reassessment of risk in respect of prior year uncertain items. Basic earnings per share was 75.4 pence (2022: 62.6 pence), an increase of 20.4%, reflecting the higher profit for the year.
Underlying income statement
Organic revenue growth of 18.8% reflects net new business growth of approximately 5%, above historical levels of approximately 3%, with like-for-like volume growth and pricing both at around 7%. Following strong like-for-like volume growth in the first half of the year, due to the pandemic-impacted comparators, volume growth normalised in the second half of the year as anticipated. Pleasingly, organic revenue growth continues to be broad-based, with all the Group’s regions performing strongly. Underlying operating profit increased by 29.6% on a constant-currency basis, to £2,122 million, and our underlying operating margin was 6.8% (2022: 6.2%), with all regions achieving significant margin progression. The strong improvement in margin reflects the benefits of operating leverage, operational efficiencies and appropriate pricing to manage inflation headwinds, and is despite mobilisation costs associated with new business growth. Underlying finance costs increased to £136 million (2022: £100 million) mainly due to an increase in interest rates and the cost of the additional debt issued in September 2022. On an underlying basis, the tax charge was £481 million (2022: £365 million), equivalent to an effective tax rate of 24.2% (2022: 24.5%). The decrease in rate primarily reflects the reassessment of prior year tax estimates and the resolution of open items, partly offset by the increase in the UK corporate tax rate from 19% to 25% from 1 April 2023. The tax environment continues to be uncertain, with more challenging tax authority audits and enquiries globally. On a constant-currency basis, underlying basic earnings per share increased by 32.5% to 86.1 pence (2022: 65.0 pence) reflecting the higher profit for the year.
| At 30 September 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Goodwill | 5,002 | 5,119 |
| Other non-current assets | 5,982 | 5,895 |
| Working capital | (1,239) | (1,319) |
| Provisions | (519) | (579) |
| Net post-employment benefit obligations | (376) | (178) |
| Current tax | (125) | (139) |
| Deferred tax | 85 | 70 |
| Net debt | (3,653) | (2,990) |
| Net assets held for sale | 4 | 26 |
| Net assets | 5,161 | 5,905 |
| Borrowings | (3,370) | (3,964) |
| Lease liabilities | (945) | (913) |
| Derivatives | (181) | (96) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 843 | 1,983 |
| Net debt | (3,653) | (2,990) |
Alternative Performance Measure (APM) (see pages 206 to 213)
Liquidity
The Group finances its operations through cash generated by the business and borrowings from a number of sources, including banking institutions, the public and the private placement markets. The Group has developed long-term relationships with a number of financial counterparties with the balance sheet strength and credit quality to provide credit facilities as required. The Group seeks to avoid a concentration of debt maturities in any one period to spread its refinancing risk. A €500 million (£438 million) Eurobond matured and was repaid in January 2023. The maturity profile of the Group’s principal borrowings at 30 September 2023 shows that the average period to maturity is 3.3 years (2022: 3.9 years). The Group’s US Private Placement (USPP) notes contain leverage and interest cover covenants which are tested semi-annually at 31 March and 30 September. The leverage covenant test stipulates that consolidated net debt must be less than or equal to 3.5 times consolidated EBITDA. The interest cover covenant test stipulates that consolidated EBITDA must be more than or equal to 3 times consolidated net finance costs. Consolidated EBITDA and net finance costs are based on the preceding 12 months. The leverage and interest cover ratios were 1.0 times and 27.6 times, respectively, at 30 September 2023. Net debt, consolidated EBITDA and net finance costs are subject to certain accounting adjustments for the purposes of the covenant tests. The covenant tests are shown in note 19 to the consolidated financial statements. At 30 September 2023, the Group had access to £2,680 million (2022: £3,732 million) of liquidity, including £2,000 million (2022: £2,000 million) of undrawn bank facilities committed to August 2026 and £680 million (2022: £1,732 million) of cash, net of overdrafts. Our credit ratings remain strong investment grade: Standard & Poor’s A/A-1 long-term/short-term (outlook Stable) and, following a rating upgrade in October 2023, Moody’s A2/P-1 long-term/short-term (outlook Stable).
Net debt
Net debt has increased by £663 million to £3,653 million (2022: £2,990 million). The Group generated £1,166 million of free cash flow, after investing £899 million in capital expenditure, which was more than offset by £287 million spent on the acquisition of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates, net of disposal proceeds, dividends of £648 million and the share buyback of £929 million. Favourable exchange translation was £168 million. The ratio of net debt to market capitalisation of £35,708 million at 30 September 2023 was 10.2% (2022: 9.3%). At 30 September 2023, the ratio of net debt to underlying EBITDA was 1.2x (2022: 1.3x). Our leverage policy is to maintain strong investment-grade credit ratings and to target net debt to underlying EBITDA in the range of 1x-1.5x.Post-employment benefits
The Group has continued to review and monitor its pension obligations throughout the year, working closely with the trustees and actuaries of all schemes across the Group to ensure appropriate assumptions are used and adequate provision and contributions are made. The accounting surplus in the Compass Group Pension Plan reduced to £430 million at 30 September 2023 (2022: £581 million) mainly reflecting a decrease in the market value of plan assets, partly offset by an increase in the discount rate, net of inflation, used to measure the liabilities. The deficit in the rest of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes has increased to £806 million (2022: £759 million). The net deficit in these schemes is £106 million (2022: £108 million) including investments of £700 million (2022: £651 million) held in respect of unfunded pension schemes and the US Rabbi Trust which do not meet the definition of pension assets under IAS 19 Employee Benefits. The total pensions operating charge for defined contribution schemes in the year was £208 million (2022: £175 million) and £30 million (2022: £24 million) for defined benefit schemes.
Return on capital employed
Return on capital employed was 19.5% (2022: 15.8%) based on net underlying operating profit after tax at the underlying effective tax rate of 24.2% (2022: 24.5%). The increase mainly reflects the higher profit, partly offset by higher average capital employed. The average capital employed was £8,215 million (2022: £7,567 million).
For the year ended 30 September 2023
| £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|
| Free cash flow | 1,166 | 823 |
| Add back: Lease repayments | 176 | 152 |
| New lease liabilities and amendments | (264) | (139) |
| Acquisition and disposal of businesses | (287) | (258) |
| Dividends paid | (648) | (418) |
| Purchase of own shares | (945) | (431) |
| Foreign exchange translation | 168 | (251) |
| Other non-cash movements | (29) | 70 |
| Increase in net debt | (663) | (452) |
| Opening net debt | (2,990) | (2,538) |
| Net debt | (3,653) | (2,990) |
Free cash flow
| | 1,166 | 823 |
| Add back: Cash payments related to restructuring and strategic programmes and the one-off pension charge | 58 | 57 |
| Add back: Acquisition transaction costs | 17 | 10 |
| Underlying free cash flow | 1,241 | 890 |
Alternative Performance Measure (APM) (see pages 206 to 213)
APM which is also a Key Performance Indicator (see page 7)
Free cash flow
Free cash flow totalled £1,166 million (2022: £823 million). During the year, we made cash payments totalling £58 million (2022: £57 million) in relation to restructuring and strategic programmes and the one-off pension charge. Adjusting for this, and for acquisition transaction costs of £17 million (2022: £10 million) which are reported as part of operating cash flow, underlying free cash flow was £1,241 million (2022: £890 million), with underlying free cash flow conversion at 58.5% (2022: 56.0%). Capital expenditure of £899 million (2022: £704 million) is equivalent to 2.9% (2022: 2.7%) of underlying revenue. The working capital outflow, excluding provisions and pensions, was £98 million (2022: £159 million). The net interest outflow increased to £120 million (2022: £86 million) consistent with the higher underlying finance costs in the year. The net tax paid was £441 million (2022: £332 million), which is equivalent to an underlying cash tax rate of 22.2% (2022: 22.3%).
Acquisition and disposal of businesses
The total cash spent on business acquisitions during the year, net of cash acquired, was £351 million (2022: £303 million), including £285 million of bolt-on acquisitions and interests in joint ventures and associates, £49 million of deferred and contingent consideration and other payments relating to businesses acquired in previous years, and £17 million of acquisition transaction costs included in net cash flow from operating activities. The Group received £47 million (2022: £35 million) in respect of disposal proceeds net of exit costs, which primarily comprises the sale of businesses in the US and Central and Eastern Europe, together with a further 28% shareholding in the Japanese Highways business classified as an asset held for sale at 30 September 2022.
Dividends paid
Dividends paid in 2023 of £648 million represents the 2022 final dividend (£387 million) and the 2023 interim dividend (£261 million).
Purchase of own shares
There was a £78 million cash outflow in respect of the completion of the £500 million share buyback announced in May 2022, a £251 million cash outflow in respect of the completion of the £250 million share buyback announced in November 2022 and a £600 million cash outflow in respect of the £750 million share buyback announced in May 2023. The balance of the £750 million share buyback was completed in November 2023. In addition, the Compass Group PLC All Share Schemes Trust spent £16 million on purchases of the Company’s shares to satisfy some of the Group’s liabilities to employees for long-term incentive plans.
Foreign exchange translation
The £168 million gain (2022: £251 million loss) on foreign exchange translation of net debt primarily arises in respect of the Group’s US dollar-denominated USPP notes.
Other non-cash movements
Other non-cash movements primarily comprises fair value movements on derivative financial instruments used to manage the Group’s interest rate exposure.
Change in reporting currency
With effect from 1 October 2023, the reporting currency of the Group was changed from sterling to US dollars. The change in presentation currency will provide investors and other stakeholders with greater transparency of the Group’s performance and reduce foreign exchange volatility on earnings given that approximately three-quarters of the Group’s underlying operating profit originates in US dollars.
Capital allocation
Our capital allocation framework is clear and unchanged. Our priority is to invest in the business to fund growth opportunities, target a strong investment-grade credit rating with a leverage target of around 1x-1.5x net debt to EBITDA and pay an ordinary dividend, with any surplus capital being returned to shareholders. Growth investment consists of: (i) capital expenditure to support organic growth in both new business wins and retention of existing contracts; and (ii) bolt-on M&A opportunities that strengthen our capabilities and broaden our exposure. We have a proven track record of strong returns from our investment strategy as evidenced by our historical returns on capital employed.
Shareholder returns
Our dividend policy is to pay out around 50% of underlying earnings through an interim and final dividend, with the interim dividend reflecting around one-third of the total annual dividend. In determining the level of dividend in any year, the Board considers a number of factors, which include but are not limited to:
– the level of available distributable reserves in the Parent Company
– future cash commitments and investment requirements to sustain the long-term growth prospects of the business
– potential strategic opportunities
– the level of dividend cover
Further surpluses, after considering the matters set out above, may be distributed to shareholders over time by way of special dividend payments, share repurchases or a combination of both. Compass Group PLC, the Parent Company of the Group, is a non-trading investment holding company which derives its distributable reserves from dividends paid by subsidiary companies. The level of distributable reserves in the Parent Company is reviewed annually and the Group aims to maintain distributable reserves that provide adequate cover for shareholder returns. The distributable reserves of the Parent Company include the distributable portion of retained earnings and the own shares reserve totalling £2,379 million at 30 September 2023 (2022: £2,969 million). An interim dividend of 15.0 pence per share (2022: 9.4 pence per share), £261 million in aggregate, was paid in July 2023. It is proposed that a final dividend of 28.1 pence per share (2022: 22.1 pence per share), £482 million in aggregate, be paid on 29 February 2024 to shareholders on the register on 19 January 2024. This will result in a total dividend for the year of 43.1 pence per share (2022: 31.5 pence per share), £743 million in aggregate (2022: £555 million). The dividend is covered 2.0 times on an underlying earnings basis. The final dividend of 28.1 pence will be paid gross and a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) will be available. The last date for receipt of elections for the DRIP will be 8 February 2024. The Group is in a strong position to fund its dividend, which is well covered by cash generated by the business. Details of the Group’s going concern assessment can be found on page 151. The ability of the Board to maintain its future dividend policy will be influenced by a number of the principal risks identified on pages 26 to 30 that could adversely impact the performance of the Group, although we believe we have the ability to mitigate those risks as outlined on pages 26 to 30.
The £250 million share buyback announced in November 2022 was completed in March 2023. The £750 million share buyback announced in May 2023 was completed in November 2023. We have announced a further share buyback of up to $500 million (£410 million), to complete in 2024 subject to M&A activity.
The Group manages its liquidity, foreign currency exposure and interest rate risk in accordance with the policies set out below. The Group’s financial instruments comprise cash, borrowings, receivables and payables that are used to finance the Group’s operations. The Group also uses derivatives, principally interest rate swaps, forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps, to manage interest rate and currency risks arising from the Group’s operations. The Group does not trade in financial instruments.# The Group’s treasury policies
TheGroup’s treasury policies are designed to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates and exchange rates and to manage the Group’s financial risks. The Board approves any changes to thepolicies.
The Group’s policy is to balance its principal projected cash flows by currency with actual or effective borrowings in the same currency. As currency cash flows are generated, they are used to service and repay debt in the same currency. Where necessary to implement this policy, forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps are taken out which, when applied to the actual currency borrowings, convert these to the required currency. The borrowings in each currency can give rise to foreign exchange differences on translation into sterling. Where the borrowings are either less than, or equal to, the net investment in overseas operations, these exchange rate movements are treated as movements on reserves and recorded in the consolidated statementof comprehensive income rather than in the consolidatedincome statement. Non-sterling earnings streams are translated at the average rate of exchange for the year. Fluctuations in exchange rates have given, and will continue to give, rise to translation differences. The Group is only partially protected against the impact of such differences through the matching of cash flows to currency borrowings.
As set out above, the Group has effective borrowings in a number of currencies and its policy is to ensure that, in the short term, it is not materially exposed to fluctuations in interest rates in its principal currencies. The Group implements this policy either by borrowing fixed rate debt or by using interest rate swaps so that the interest rates on at least 80% of the Group’s projected debt are fixed for one year. For the second and third year, interest rates are fixed within ranges of 30% to 70% and 0% to 40% of projected debt, respectively.
As a Group, we are committed to creating long-term shareholder value through the responsible, sustainable and efficient delivery of our key business objectives. This will enable us to grow the business and make significant investments in the Group and its operations. We adopt an approach to tax that supports this strategy and also balances the various interests of our stakeholders, including shareholders, governments, employees and the communities in which we operate. Our aim is to pursue a principled and sustainable tax strategy that has strong commercial merit and is aligned with our business strategy. We believe this will enhance shareholder value whilst protecting our reputation. In doing so, we act in compliance with the relevant local and international laws and disclosure requirements, and we conduct an open and transparent relationship with the relevant tax authorities that fully complies with the Group’s Code of Business Conduct and Business Integrity Policy.
After many years of operation, the Group has numerous legacy subsidiaries across the world. Whilst some of these entities are incorporated in low-tax territories, Compass does not seek to avoid taxthrough the use of tax havens. Details of the Group’s related undertakings are listed in note 36 to the consolidated financialstatements.
In an increasingly complex international corporate tax environment, adegree of tax risk and uncertainty is, however, inevitable. Tax risk can arise from unclear regulations and differences in interpretation but, most significantly, where tax authorities apply diverging standardsin assessing intra-group cross-border transactions. Thisisthe situation for many multinational organisations. We manageand control these risks in a proactive manner and, in doingso, exercise our judgement and seek appropriate advice fromrelevant professional firms. Tax risks are assessed as part of theGroup’s formal governance process and are reviewed by the Boardand the Audit Committee on a regular basis.
The Board takes a proactive approach to risk management aimed atprotecting the Group’s employees, clients and consumers and safeguarding the interests of the Company and its shareholders in a constantly changing environment. The principal risks and uncertainties facing the business, and the activities the Group undertakes to mitigate these, are set out on pages26 to 30.
Details of transactions with related parties are set out in note 32 to the consolidated financial statements. These transactions have not had, and are not expected to have, a material effect on the financial performance or position of the Group.
The factors considered by the directors in assessing the ability of the Group and Parent Company to continue as a going concern are discussed on page 151. The Group has access to considerable financial resources, together with longer-term contracts with a number of clients and suppliers across different geographic areas and industries. As a consequence, the directors believe that the Group is well placed to manage its business risks successfully. Based on the assessment discussed on page 151, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group and Parent Company have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for at least the period to 31 March 2025. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Palmer Brown
Group Chief Financial Officer
20 November 2023
21Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Underlying operating profit
Underlying operating profit growth 1
| Underlying Change | Statutory Change | Revenue 2023 | Revenue 2022 | Reported rates | Constant currency | Organic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North America | £21,092m | £17,139m | 23.1% | 17.9% | 17.4% | £21,073m | £17,121m | ||||
| Europe | £7,038m | £5,935m | 18.6% | 19.0% | 21.6% | £6,804m | £5,694m | ||||
| Rest of World | £3,151m | £2,697m | 16.8% | 21.1% | 21.8% | £3,151m | £2,697m | ||||
| Total | £31,281m | £25,771m | 21.4% | 18.5% | 18.8% | £31,028m | £25,512m | ||||
| Operating profit | |||||||||||
| North America | £1,653m | £1,236m | 33.7% | 28.0% | 28.0% | £1,581m | £1,183m | ||||
| Europe | £392m | £299m | 31.1% | 31.5% | 31.6% | £240m | £267m | ||||
| Rest of World | £175m | £141m | 24.1% | 30.6% | 34.1% | £168m | £137m | ||||
| Unallocated costs | £(98)m | £(86)m | £(98)m | £(87)m | |||||||
| Total | £2,122m | £1,590m | 33.5% | 29.6% | 29.8% | £1,891m | £1,500m | ||||
| Underlying Change | Statutory Change | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Operating margin | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||
| North America | 7.8% | 7.2% | 60bps | 7.5% | 6.9% | 60bps | |||||
| Europe | 5.6% | 5.0% | 60bps | 3.5% | 4.7% | (120)bps | |||||
| Rest of World | 5.6% | 5.2% | 40bps | 5.3% | 5.1% | 20bps | |||||
| Total | 6.8% | 6.2% | 60bps | 6.1% | 5.9% | 20bps |
Alternative Performance Measure (APM) (see pages 206 to 213)
APM which is also a Key Performance Indicator (see page 7)
Underlying operating profit
Underlying operating profit growth 1
Underlying operating profit
Underlying operating profit growth 1
Underlying revenue
Underlying revenue
Underlying revenue
Underlying Operating profit increased by 28.0% on a constant-currency basis, to£1,653 million, driven by strong organic revenue growth and continued margin progression. Organic revenue growth was 17.4%, with new business wins benefiting from significant levels of first-time outsourcing, strong retention rates at 96.9%, appropriate levels of pricing and like-for-like volume growth underpinned by the scaling of digital capabilities. Growth was broad-based across all sectors. Business & Industry benefited from double-digit net new business growth and favourable like-for-like volume growth as employees continued to return to the office. Sports & Leisure benefited from high participation rates and per capita spend, but also a strong calendar of events, including basketball, hockey, baseball, music and convention centres. Our Education and Healthcare & Senior Living businesses also delivered strong growth from net new business, like-for-like volume growth and pricing. Operating margin increased by 60bps to 7.8% in spite of inflation headwinds driven by management focus on productivity, cost mitigation and appropriate pricing, in addition to ongoing scalebenefits. The region invested in several bolt-on acquisitions to strengthen our capabilities, including the acquisition of Parks Coffee in the first half ofthe year, a provider of workplace refreshments in the US.
Statutory revenue increased by 23.1% to £21,073 million reflecting the strong organic revenue growth and favourable exchange translation. Statutory operating profit was £1,581 million (2022: £1,183 million), with the difference from underlying operating profit being acquisition- related charges of £72 million (2022: £57 million).
Underlying Operating profit was £392 million, growth of 31.5% on a constant- currency basis, driven by high levels of revenue growth and strong margin progression, supported by our investment in growth initiatives and core processes across the region. Organic revenue growth of 21.6% was driven by net new business growth, strong volume growth and pricing. Client retention rates improved by a further 70bps to 96.0%. Double-digit organic revenue growth rates were achieved across all sectors and, most notably, in Business & Industry, Education and Sports & Leisure, which all benefited from high levels of net new business, like-for-like volume growth and pricing. Growth was strong in all major markets, most notably in the UK, Germany and Türkiye, which all made a significant contribution to the region.# Strategic report
Margin progression of 60bps, which resulted in an operating margin of 5.6%, was achieved by controlling costs to maximise operating leverage and by continuing to work closely with clients to mitigate the sustained level of inflationary pressures within the region. The region invested in bolt-on acquisitions, most notably to drive additional procurement efficiencies in the UK and to expand our footprint in the Education sector in Ireland. Since the year-end, we have agreed to acquire Hofmann Menü-Manufaktur GmbH, a German producer of high-quality cook and freeze meals, to add new capability and distribution networks. As part of the Group’s ongoing strategic portfolio review, we exited five businesses in Central and Eastern Europe (Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania and Estonia) to focus resources and investment on core operations.
Statutory revenue increased by 19.5% to £6,804 million, with the difference from underlying revenue being the presentation of the share of results of our joint ventures operating in the Middle East. Statutory operating profit was £240 million (2022: £267 million), with the difference from underlying operating profit mainly reflecting charges related to the Group’s ongoing strategic portfolio review of £99 million (2022: £nil), including site closures and contract reorganisations and terminations in the UK, and acquisition-related charges of £46 million (2022: £30 million).
Operating profit increased to £175 million, which represents growth of 30.6% on a constant-currency basis. Organic revenue growth was 21.8% reflecting high net new business growth, strong levels of like-for-like volume growth and pricing. Client retention rates improved by 90bps to 95.4%. Organic revenue growth was broad-based across all sectors. Growth was particularly pleasing in our Business & Industry sector across most markets, notably in India and Japan, as office attendance levels increased, and in our more defensive Defence, Offshore & Remote sector, especially in Australia and Chile, where like-for-like volume growth and net new business levels were high. Operating margin increased by 40bps to 5.6% driven by strong management focus on operational challenges in the region, including the sustained levels of inflation and labour shortages in certain markets. As part of the Group’s ongoing strategic portfolio review, we exited Azerbaijan and Indonesia during the year and, subsequent to the year-end, our operations in Argentina and Angola.
Statutory revenue increased by 16.8% to £3,151 million. There is no difference between statutory and underlying revenue. Statutory operating profit was £168 million (2022: £137 million), with the difference from underlying operating profit being acquisition-related charges of £7 million (2022: £4 million).
23Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The Board takes a proactive approach to risk management aimed at protecting the Group’s employees, clients and consumers and safeguarding the interests of the Company and its shareholders in a constantly changing environment. Risk management is an essential element of business governance. The Group has risk management policies, processes and procedures in place to ensure that risks are properly identified, evaluated and managed at the appropriate level. The identification of risks and opportunities, the development of action plans to manage those risks and maximise the opportunities, and the continual monitoring of progress against agreed key performance indicators (KPIs) are integral parts of the business process and core activities throughout the Group.
In compliance with provision 28 of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the Code), the Board has conducted a robust assessment of the Company’s emerging and principal risks. The following pages set out the Board’s approach to assessing and mitigating risk, the principal risks of the Company, and the procedures in place to identify emerging risks.
The Board has overall responsibility for risk management. This includes establishing policies and procedures to manage risk, overseeing the internal control framework, reviewing the nature and extent of the principal risks, setting risk appetite and embedding a culture of risk management throughout the business. The Board has approved a Risk Management Policy. The Group operates a formal risk management process in accordance with this policy, under which the Group’s principal risks (set out on pages 26 to 30) are assessed and prioritised biannually. In accordance with the FRC’s Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial Business Reporting 2014 and in the Code, this process has been in place for the financial year under review.
These systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve the Group’s strategic objectives, safeguard the Group’s assets against material loss, fairly report the Group’s performance and position, and ensure compliance with relevant legislation, regulation and best practice including that related to social, environmental and ethical matters. These systems provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss.
The Board delegates aspects of risk management, with the Executive Committee responsible for the day-to-day management of significant risk, and the Audit Committee responsible for the oversight of Compass’ risk management systems and internal financial controls. The Group Director of Risk and Internal Audit maintains the risk management framework including the Risk Management Policy. The Audit Committee annually reviews the effectiveness of the Group’s approach to risk management and any changes to the Risk Management Policy, and recommends the principal risks and uncertainties disclosures made in the Annual Report and Accounts to the Board for approval. The Audit Committee’s report is on pages 82 to 88.
Risks and the corresponding controls and mitigations are reviewed by country and regional leadership teams on an ongoing basis. Risk updates are integral to periodic management reviews and are regularly reviewed by the Regional Governance Committees (RGCs) and the Executive Committee. A critical component of the risk review process is the dynamic identification of emerging and developing risks at a country, regional and Group level. This bottom-up and top-down approach provides a comprehensive assessment of the key risks facing the Group. The findings of the risk reviews, including the principal risks and any developing trends, are reported to and considered by the Board twice a year.
Risks are considered at gross and net levels. This allows the impact of each risk and likelihood of its occurrence both before and after controls and mitigations to be assessed. Risk management plans are developed for all significant risks. They include a clear description of the nature of the risk, quantification of the potential impact and likelihood of occurrence, the owners for each risk, and details of the controls and mitigations in place, proportionate to the risk, and in line with the Company’s business.
The identification and assessment of climate-related risks and opportunities are incorporated within the risk management process. All country operating units are mandated to consider climate-related risks and opportunities. These are assessed in terms of percentage profit before interest and tax (PBIT) impact in accordance with the criteria set out in the Board-approved Risk Management Policy. All country and Group-level risks are assigned risk owners and, together with the mitigations, are recorded in the central risk reporting system.
Group companies also submit biannual risk and internal control assurance letters to the Group CFO on internal control and risk management issues, with comments on the control environment within their operations. The Chair of the Audit Committee reports to the Board on any matters arising from the Committee’s review of how the risk management and internal control processes have been applied. The Audit Committee keeps under review the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s and Group’s internal financial controls and risk management systems. These are discussed in further detail in the Audit Committee report on pages 82 to 88.
The Board interprets risk appetite as the level of risk that the Company is willing to take to meet its strategic objectives. The Board’s attitude to and appetite for risk are communicated to the Group’s businesses through the strategy planning process and the internal risk governance and control frameworks. In determining its risk appetite, the Board recognises that a prudent and robust approach to risk mitigation must be carefully balanced with a degree of flexibility so that the entrepreneurial spirit that has greatly contributed to the Group’s success is not inhibited.
In assessing risk appetite, the Board reviews the three-year business plan and associated strategic risks. Risk appetite for specific financial risks such as funding and liquidity, credit, counter-party, foreign exchange and interest rate risk are set out in the Board approved treasury policies. Compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, such as those contained in the Companies Act, health and safety and other risk-specific legislation, is mandatory.
Risk management 24 Strategic report
The Board has established processes for identifying emerging risks, and horizon scanning for risks that may arise over the medium to long term. Emerging and potential changes to the Group’s risk profile are identified through the Group’s risk management framework and through direct feedback from management, including in regard to changing operating conditions, and market and consumer trends.# Risk management continued
MAP 1: Client sales and marketing
MAP 2: Consumer sales and marketing
MAP 3: Cost of food
MAP 4: In-unit costs
MAP 5: Above-unit overheads
Climate change
The Group continues to focus on evaluating its exposure to climate change and seeks to identify potential future issues early so that sourcing and operations can be adjusted, and menus adapted appropriately. Work continues with clients and suppliers to propose, execute and measure solutions to support their efforts and those of Compass in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Compass has targeted climate net zero GHG emissions by 2050 alongside validated science-based targets to reduce emissions by 2030 (from a 2019 base year) in line with the 2015 Paris Agreement. The impact of climate change on the environment may lead to issues around food sourcing and supply chain continuity in some of the Group’s markets. Issues in these areas could affect the availability of some food products, and potentially may lead to food cost inflation.
To enhance its ability to counter risks to its businesses and supply chains from modern slavery, Compass has focused on the areas where its human rights strategy can have the greatest impact. This has been done through the Human Rights Working Group, the engagement of external specialist advisers, the Group’s modern slavery e-learning tools and ongoing work to strengthen and improve the Group’s human rights due diligence through supplier evaluation and labour agency reviews. Compass relies on its people to deliver great service to its clients and consumers and recognises that the welfare of employees is the foundation of its culture and business. Compass remains vigilant in upholding high standards of business ethics with regard to human rights and social equality.
Health and safety
Management meetings throughout the Group feature a health and safety update as one of their first substantive agenda items. Health and safety improvement KPIs are included in the annual bonus plans for each of the businesses’ management teams. The Group has policies, procedures and standards in place to ensure compliance with legal obligations and industry standards. The safety and quality of the Group’s global supply chain are assured through compliance with a robust set of standards which are regularly reviewed, audited and upgraded as necessary to improve supply chain visibility and product integrity. Further mitigations in place include our Global Operational Safety Standards, Global Supply Chain Integrity Standards and a Global Allergen Management Plan. Compass feeds millions of consumers every day and its companies employ hundreds of thousands of people around the world. For that reason, setting the highest standards for food hygiene and safety is paramount. Health and safety breaches could cause serious business interruption and could result in criminal and civil prosecution, increased costs and potential damage to the Company’s reputation.
Link to: See page 5
Pandemic
Operations and working practices have been adjusted to retain the skills and experience of colleagues and provide flexibility in the event of another pandemic which leads to a resumption of containment measures. To protect the Group’s employees, clients and consumers, enhanced health and safety protocols and personal protective equipment requirements and guidelines, hygiene requirements and site layout solutions developed in consultation with expert advisers and with our clients, have been adopted. Careful management of the Group’s cost base and robust measures to protect the Group’s liquidity position have ensured that we remain resilient and well placed to take advantage of appropriate opportunities as they arise. Robust incident management and business continuity plans are in place and are monitored for effectiveness and regularly reviewed to ensure they reflect evolving best practice. The Group’s operations were significantly disrupted due to the global COVID-19 pandemic and associated containment measures. Compass has recovered well and learned from the pandemic, and as a result this risk has declined. Further outbreaks of the virus, or another pandemic, could cause further business risk.
Recruitment
The Group aims to mitigate this risk by efficient and time-critical resource management, mobilisation of existing experienced employees within the organisation, improved use of technology such as apps and social media, targeted recruitment, and training and development programmes. Failure to attract and recruit people with the right skills at all levels could limit the success of the Group. The Group faces resourcing challenges in some of its businesses in some key positions due to labour shortages and a lack of industry experience amongst candidates, appropriately qualified people, and the seasonal nature of some of Compass’ businesses.
Retention and motivation
The Group has established tools, training, development, performance management and reward programmes to help retain, develop, motivate and support its people. The Group has a number of well-established initiatives which help to monitor levels of engagement and to respond to the needs of employees. Specifically, Compass has increased its local focus and employee support on mental health awareness, stress management and resilience to better equip its people in times of uncertainty and change. To protect its workforce, Compass applies measures available to it to retain as many of its skilled workforce as possible, including redeployment. Retaining and motivating the best people with the right skills, at all levels of the organisation, is key to the long-term success of the Group. Changes to economic conditions may increase the risk of attrition at all levels of the organisation. Potential business closures resulting from further COVID-19 or other pandemic-related lockdowns or other social distancing controls could significantly impact the Group’s workforce in affected regions.
Compass has strategies based on quality, value and innovation that strengthen its long-term relationships with its clients and consumers. The Group’s business model is structured so that it is not reliant on one particular sector or group of clients. Technology is used to support the delivery of efficiencies and to contribute to growth through, for example, cashierless and cashless payment systems and the use of artificial intelligence. This is beneficial to clients and consumers and positively impacts retention and new business wins. Compass continues to focus on financial security and safety. In today’s environment, these are key strengths for clients. Contracts may be renegotiated. There is continued focus on retention and new sales and the use of technology and innovative client solutions. The Group’s businesses rely on securing and retaining a diverse range of clients. The potential loss of material client contracts in an increasingly competitive market is a risk to Compass’ businesses.# Service delivery, contractual compliance and retention
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: People/Performance
Processes are in place to ensure that the services delivered to clients are of an appropriate standard and comply with the required contract terms and conditions. The Group’s operating companies contract with a large number of clients. Failure to comply with the terms of these contracts, including proper delivery of services, could lead to the loss of business and/or claims.
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: Performance
Compass aims to minimise this risk and to respond to new market and consumer food services trends by continuing to promote its differentiated propositions and by focusing on its strengths, such as flexibility in its cost base, quality, value of service and innovation. Harnessing knowledge and experience and continuing to invest in technology helps to counter any potential risk and to capitalise on the opportunities created. Compass continues to evolve its offer to increase participation rates and service sites of different sizes. The businesses are able to adapt to changes in the service provision environment and where possible take advantage of changes in the market. By leveraging its expertise and technology Compass is able to differentiate its food services offer. For example, investments inSmartQ and EAT Club have given Compass platforms that allow itto pivot food operations according to changing client and consumer demands. The Group operates in a highly competitive marketplace. The levels of concentration and outsource penetration vary by country and by sector. Some markets are relatively concentrated with two or three key players. Others are highly fragmented and offer significant opportunities for consolidation and penetration of the self-operated market. Ongoing structural changes in working and education environments may reduce the number of people in offices and educational establishments. The emergence of new industry participants and traditional competition using disruptive technology could adversely affect the Group’s businesses.
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: People/Performance/Purpose
As a Group, Compass is monitoring the situation closely with thesafety and security of the Group’s employees front of mind. Whilst we do not operate in Israel or the Palestinian territories, we do have interests elsewhere in the Middle East. Last year, Compass permanently exited the Russian market and moved awayfrom all known Russian suppliers. The Group continues to manage inflation risks by sharing best practice across the Group to drive greater efficiencies through menu management, supplier rationalisation, labour scheduling, and productivity through the increased use of technology. Cost indexation in our contracts also gives Compass the contractual right to review pricing with clients. The escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict have elevated geopolitical risks, heightened national security threats to countries in those regions and disrupted the global energy market, which have contributed to cost inflation, and economic and cyber-security risks.
28 Strategic report
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: People/Performance/Purpose
As part of Compass’ strategy, the Group is focused on productivity and purchasing initiatives which help to manage the cost base. During adverse conditions, if necessary actions can be taken to reduce labour costs and action plans have been implemented to protect profitability and liquidity. Sectors of Compass’ business could be susceptible to adverse changes in economic conditions and employment levels. Continued worsening of economic conditions has increased the risk to the businesses in some jurisdictions.
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: People/Performance
As part of the MAP framework, and by sharing best practice across the Group, Compass seeks to manage inflation by continuing to drive greater efficiencies through menu management, supplier rationalisation, labour scheduling and productivity, and through the increased use of technology. Cost indexation in our contracts also gives Compass the contractual right to review pricing with clients. Cost action programmes and the continued oversight of supply chain costs are also mitigating the risks in this area. At Compass, our objective is always to deliver the right level of service in the most efficient way. An increase in the cost of labour, for example, minimum wages in the US and UK, or the cost of food, could constitute a risk to our ability to do this.
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: People/Performance/Purpose
The Group remains alert to future changes presented by emerging markets or fledgling administrations and tries to anticipate and contribute to important changes in public policy. Where possible, Compass seeks to absorb price increases through operational efficiencies. Cost indexation in our contracts also gives Compass the contractual right to review pricing with clients. Recruitment and retention strategies are also in place to mitigate any impact on labour supply. Compass remains vigilant to changes in political stability in local jurisdictions and retains the flexibility to take appropriate mitigating action as necessary. Compass is a global business operating in countries and regions with diverse economic and political conditions. Operations and earnings may be adversely affected by political or economic instability.
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: People/Performance/Purpose
The Group’s zero-tolerance-based Code of Business Conduct (CBC)and Business Integrity Policy (BIP), govern all aspects of its relationships with its stakeholders. Compass operates a continuous improvement process as part of the Group’s Ethics and Integrity programme to enhance and strengthen its culture of integrity, sharing insights and emerging trends between regional and country management teams. The Group undertakes a robust risk management assessment that helps identify major risks and ensures the internal control framework remains effective through regular monitoring, testing and review. Regulatory and compliance risks are included in this process to enable visibility and planning to address them. A strong culture of integrity is promoted through Compass’ Ethics and Integrity programme and its independently operated Speak Up, We’re Listening helpline and web platform. All alleged breaches of the CBC and the BIP, including any allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption, anti-competitive behaviour and other serious misconduct, are followed up, investigated and dealt with appropriately. Regulation and compliance risk is also considered as part of the annual business planning process. Our Ethics and Integrity e-learning platform provides increased engagement on key regulatory and ethics and integrity topics for Group employees and clear communication of standards and expectations. Internal Audit regularly reviews internal controls and analyses financial transactions to mitigate the risk of error or fraud. Ineffective compliance management with increasingly complex laws and regulations, or evidence of fraud, bribery and corruption, anti-competitive behaviour or other serious misconduct, could have an adverse effect on the Group’s reputation or on its performance and/or lead to a reduction in the Company’s share price and/or a loss of business. It could also lead to criminal proceedings, sanctions or other litigation being brought against the Company, its directors or executive management. Companies face increased risk of fraud, bribery and corruption, anti-competitive behaviour and other serious misconduct both internally and externally, due to financial and/or performance pressures and significant changes to ways of working.
29 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: Performance
Compass seeks to plan and manage its tax affairs efficiently in the jurisdictions in which the Group’s businesses operate. Compass acts in compliance with relevant laws and disclosure requirements. Compass manages and controls these risks in a proactive manner and in doing so exercises judgement and seeks appropriate advice from reputable professional firms. Tax risks are assessed as part of the Group’s formal governance process and are reviewed by the Board and the Audit Committee on a regular basis. The Group proactively manages its tax arrangements in accordance with various government-led initiatives and ensures compliance is achieved by putting robust processes and controls in place, including third-party support and review. The international corporate tax environment remains complex and the sustained increase in audit activity from tax authorities means that the potential for tax uncertainties and disputes remains high. The need to raise public finances is likely to cause governments to consider increases in tax rates and other potentially adverse changes in tax legislation, and to renew focus on compliance for large corporates.
2023: 2022: Strategic pillar link: People/Performance
Compass continually assesses its cyber risk, and monitors and manages the maturity of its enterprise infrastructure, platforms and security controls to ensure that it can effectively prevent, detect and respond to current or future cyber-attacks. Appropriate crisis management procedures are in place to manage issues in the event of a cyber incident occurring.Our response protocols are supported by using industry-standard tooling, experienced IT and security professionals, and external partners to mitigate potential impacts. Assurance is provided by regular compliance monitoring of our key information technology control framework, which is designed to prevent and defend against cyber threats and other risks. The Group relies on a variety of digital and technology platforms to manage and deliver services and communicate with its people, clients, consumers and suppliers. Compass’ decentralised model and infrastructure help to mitigate propagation of attacks across the Group’s technology estate. Compass continues to be focused on the need to maximise the effectiveness of its information systems and technology as a business enabler. As such, the Group continues to invest in technology and specialist resources in order to further strengthen its platforms, cyber-security defences and controls to prevent and detect cyber threats and respond to attacks in order to mitigate the risk of operational disruption, technology failure, unauthorised access to and/or loss of data. The Group has implemented configuration changes designed to block phishing emails, increased awareness campaigns, and provided cyber training to help employees identify these kind of attacks. In response to the potential risks posed by AI, Compass has implemented principle-based rules that apply globally, and we are currently developing a framework for the responsible use of AI in all our markets. Information systems, technology and cyber-security controls and risks are assessed as part of the Group’s formal governance processes and are reviewed by the Audit Committee on a regular basis. The digital world creates increasing risk for global businesses including, but not limited to, technology failures, loss of confidential data, data privacy breaches and damage to brand reputation through, for example, the increased threat of cyber-attacks, and use and instantaneous nature of social media. Disruption caused by the failure of key software applications, security controls, or underlying infrastructure, or disruption caused by cyber-attacks could impact day-to-day operations and management decision-making, or result in a regulatory fine or other sanction and/or third party claims. The incidence of sophisticated phishing and malware attacks (including ransomware) on businesses is rising with an increase in the number of companies suffering operational disruption, unauthorised access to and/or loss of data, including confidential, commercial, and personal identifiable data. A combination of increased geopolitical, economic instability and accessibility of sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) enabled tools and techniques have contributed to a significant increase in the risk of phishing and malware attacks including ransomware across all industries. The democratisation of generative AI has given widespread access to powerful online AI services for content creation. This opportunity presents several risks including to data privacy and confidentiality.
In accordance with provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, the directors have assessed the Group’s viability, considering its current trading performance, financial position, financing, strategic plan and principal risks.
The Board has considered the long-term prospects of the Group based on its business model, strategy and markets as set out on pages 2 to 11. Compass is a global leader in food services and the geographical and sector diversification of the Group’s operations helps to minimise the risk of serious business interruption or catastrophic damage to its reputation. The Group’s business model is structured so that it is not reliant on one group of clients or sector. The Group’s largest client constitutes 2% of underlying revenue, with the top 10 clients accounting for 9%.
The directors have determined that a three-year period to 30 September 2026 is an appropriate period over which to provide the Group‘s viability statement on the basis that it is the period reviewed by the Board in its strategic planning process and is aligned to the typical length of the Group’s contracts (three to five years). The directors believe that this presents the Board and readers of the Annual Report with a reasonable degree of confidence over this longer-term outlook.
The Board’s assessment of the Group’s viability comprises the following business processes:
The principal risks that would have the most significant impact on the Group’s business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity are further outbreaks of COVID-19 or another pandemic and associated containment measures, geopolitical tensions, economic conditions and food and labour cost inflation and these, together with the other principal risks identified on pages 26 to 30, have been considered as part of the viability assessment. Specific scenarios based on the principal risks have not been modelled on the basis that the level of headroom to absorb the occurrence of such risks is substantial and there is a range of other actions available that could be implemented to mitigate the potential impact. Substantial mitigating actions were identified and implemented as part of the Group’s COVID-19 pandemic response in 2020, including reducing capital expenditure, resizing the cost base, renegotiating client contracts, pausing M&A activity and shareholder returns, raising equity, negotiating covenant waivers and securing additional committed funding. These actions illustrate the flexibility the Group has to mitigate the impact of adverse events. In the event that the financial covenants were to come under pressure, mitigating actions include repaying the loan notes from available liquidity, or refinancing, in advance of their maturity or negotiating covenant waivers.
Based on the results of this analysis, the Board has a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the three-year period to 30 September 2026.
Palmer Brown
Group Chief Financial Officer
20 November 2023
Compass Group UK&I’s Social Promise sets out its aspiration to positively impact one million lives by 2030 through job creation, education, training and community and charitable engagement. Underpinning its Social Promise is a commitment to addressing barriers to progression, particularly in relation to gender, race and among those from less-advantaged or under-represented backgrounds. During the year, Compass Group UK&I worked with Social Value Portal to quantify the social value created by its business, which was measured at over £590 million.# Strategic report
At Compass, we know that our success is largely down to the skills and ingenuity of our chefs and front line teams. They lead the way in providing sustainable and safe food at scale, promoting healthier choices and creating great experiences for the people we serve. We feel uniquely positioned to create lifetime opportunities for our people and positively impact the communities in which we operate.
Our caring, winning culture makes us a better business. Openness, trust and accountability are fundamental to the way we work, and we are committed to ensuring that our people are treated fairly and with respect, have opportunities to grow and develop, and work in positive, supportive teams. Providing opportunities for all means we value having a diverse and inclusive workforce at all levels and we are determined to support our people to break through traditional gender, ethnicity and socio-economic barriers that might exist in society. Our businesses support people throughout their careers, both in the good times and when life experiences can be challenging. Tailored support at local level aims to help people struggling with issues around mental health, wellbeing and the cost of living.
Our businesses work to ensure that people who want to pursue a career in the food and hospitality industry can succeed with Compass. Compass encourages new joiners to make use of innovative tools such as digital onboarding applications and training programmes. A more accessible and flexible learning portfolio makes it easier for our people to pursue their longer-term ambitions. This year, more than 1,500 colleagues have signed up for the UK&I’s landmark training and development scheme, Compass Career Pathways, with over 50% of those who have completed the programme having moved or been promoted into a new role.
Examples of how Compass is reaching disadvantaged groups are as follows. Compass Group UK&I launched a Social Partner career hub as part of its Mission to a Million Social Promise. The hub supports candidates who face barriers to entering the job market, including ex-offenders, people leaving care, the long-term unemployed and people with disabilities. In a new tailored recruitment process, the hub works with partner organisations to match candidates with job opportunities and internships within the business. Training in relation to autism has been provided to unit managers to understand the challenges candidates face and deliver a supportive, inclusive and personalised hiring process.
Ex-military personnel bring unique skill sets and insights to the business. Compass Group UK&I has an estimated 1,000 employees who are part of the Armed Forces community and has reiterated its support for the Armed Forces by re-signing the Armed Forces Covenant. The business holds the Gold Employer Recognition Scheme award and has expanded the pledges to include a policy supporting the redeployment of spouses of serving military personnel.
In the US, Compass has a well-developed careers programme for military veterans, working with Hiring our Heroes and supported by VetNet, the company’s veteran employee network.
In 2022, Compass Australia became a part of the Australian Prime Minister’s Veteran Employment Program, and provides military veterans and those transitioning from defence with extra support into new career pathways by providing a structured support and mentoring programme as well as training for leaders and managers. It also supports families of serving military personnel into sustainable and ongoing employment that fits in with deployment needs.
Chief People Officer
The Compass Group Foundation (the Foundation) 1 is an independent charity, launched in January 2023 and provides grants to non-profit organisations in the communities in which Compass’ businesses operate. Funding is provided to increase access to job opportunities for disadvantaged groups, through training and experience in the food service and hospitality sector, to support equitable market access for smallholder farmers and entrepreneurs in the food supply chain, and by way of emergency response for urgent humanitarian support. The Foundation leverages the Group networks and employee volunteering, to make a difference for the community.
In the last year, the Foundation supported 14 initiatives across eight countries. One such organisation supported is Sai Swayam Society in India. Funding from the Foundation has enabled 240 young people from the speech and hearing-impaired community to attend training, delivered through sign language, and focused on hospitality, IT, life and soft skills, and helping to secure jobs.
In Spain, the Foundation provided funding to Fundación Integra, supporting women who have been victims of domestic violence, to work towards a Kitchen Assistant certification through Compass Spain’s Woman’s Academy, with Compass volunteers providing training and tutoring to the women as they progress with the qualification.
In the UK, the Foundation has supported Compass’ key charity partner, FoodCycle, to train volunteers who help to tackle food poverty, loneliness and food waste. Employees from Compass UK&I volunteered to support the training and upskilling of the FoodCycle volunteer teams.
In February 2023, the Foundation made a donation to support people affected by the earthquakes in Türkiye and Syria.
For more on the Foundation go to www.compassgroupfoundation.org
33Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Compass Group US is a long-time partner of Navigate, working with young people from underrepresented communities to become the future of the hospitality and food service workforce. This year, over 50 Navigate internship programme graduates worked with the business. In addition, the business created partnerships with Historically Black Colleges & Universities to educate students on careers. The US team is active at members’ careers fairs for talent recruitment and has created a scholarship fund for black students at Johnson C. Smith University in Charlotte, North Carolina.
As one of the country’s largest employers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Compass Australia has an important role to play in reconciliation and closing the considerable opportunity gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non- Indigenous Australians. The business provides sustained career development through its accredited training and cultural awareness programmes and is a proud partner of the Clontarf Foundation, providing support, life skills and graduate employment prospects to young Aboriginal men.
Compass Norway, in cooperation with the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, has worked to support individuals struggling to find employment, by offering the opportunity to achieve a certificate of apprenticeship and Norwegian language skills.
From entry level to leadership, Compass invests in its people to help them achieve their career ambitions and shape the expertise and passion that drives the businesses. Around the world, Compass businesses run programmes that identify and nurture a diverse cohort of leaders from within their existing teams.
In Asia, the Compass Japan Academy introduced a six-month long programme for 300 future managers and Compass Group India launched a new immersive Leadership Lab to support the career growth of new leaders. The Indian business also provided 40,000 employees with additional training through a new digital app to support learning journeys and opened two new skills centres to enable in-person tuition and the development of key capabilities. As part of their career development, employees in the US completed more than one million training sessions in the business’s Learning Management System.
| Leadership Development | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Executive leaders | c.350 | ||
| Emerging leaders | c.1,600 | ||
| Multi-unit leaders | c.8,500 | ||
| First-time / Front line leaders | c.50,000 | ||
| ** programmes ** | Rise Global Gender Programme | 30% Club | Winning Operator |
| Women Impact Leadership | Consumer-led Growth | Europe and Middle East Academy | |
| 30% Club | Consumer-led Growth | Mapping for Action | |
| Leadership Labs | Leadership in Action | Mapping for Action | |
| Leadership Labs |
Our aim is for Compass to reflect the communities in which we operate and to give all employees equal opportunities to progress their careers. Diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) is a living imperative within the businesses, and everyone, from front line workers to the Group’s leadership, has a role to play in creating a supportive and caring environment for all.# People
As a Group, we are committed to upholding human rights, always treating people fairly, with dignity and respect, and we expect our businesses’ suppliers to uphold these same high standards throughout the value chain. We recognise the importance and responsibility of respecting the human rights of all our employees within our own operations, those workers throughout our businesses’ supply chains and the communities in which our businesses operate. We approach human rights in the same way as we conduct our business activities: ethically and with integrity, as set out in our Code of Business Conduct (CBC) and Global Supplier Code of Conduct (SCOC), demonstrating our commitments and Compass’ Values in our actions and behaviours. We are also guided by our Human Rights Policy (reviewed in September 2023), in which we set out our belief that everyone is entitled to basic rights and freedoms, whoever they are, and wherever they live.
In the past year, we have continued to make progress to increase awareness and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the principal human rights risks across the diverse and complex environments our businesses operate in. We have also taken the opportunity to improve and enhance the associated processes, procedures, systems, training and polices aimed at improving our performance in this area. From reinforcing and further expanding existing successful practices and tools (such as, the award-winning Ethical Recruitment process in our business in the Middle East, the Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) framework and Supplier Ethical Data Exchange (Sedex) implementation), to developing new bespoke Human Rights training such as Striving For a More Equitable World and launching our Third-Party Integrity Due Diligence process, our businesses have focused on those activities where they can make the greatest positive impact. In the coming year, we will continue to build on our progress to date, concentrating our efforts and investment where we can make the biggest difference, and continuing to promote best practice across the Group’s businesses and their supply chains.
For more on our approach to human rights, including our Human Rights Policy and Modern Slavery Act Statement go to: www.compass-group.com/en/sustainability/people/human-rights- and-ethical-trade
Apprenticeships are a hugely popular route to a successful career in Compass, alongside the more traditional graduate routes. The UK&I’s unique Forward with Marcus Wareing programme runs alongside a Level 4 Senior Culinary Chef or Level 5 Operations Departmental Manager apprenticeship standard, and partners with the Michelin- starred chef, focusing on sustainability, diversity and leadership.
Our aim is for Compass to reflect the communities in which we operate and to give all employees equal opportunities to progress their careers. Diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) is a living imperative within our businesses, and everyone, from front line workers to the Group’s leadership, has a role to play in creating a supportive and caring environment for all. In the UK&I, Compass has added Ability, an employee network supporting people with disabilities, to its four established networks: Women in Food, Within (promoting ethnic, religious and cultural diversity), Pride in Food (for members of the LGBTQ+ community and allies) and You Matter (supporting mental health and wellbeing). Activities recognising and celebrating awareness events such as Pride Month, Mental Health Awareness Week, Learning Disability Week and International Women’s Day run throughout the year.
Our Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Policy sets out our approach to diversity, equity and inclusion. It applies to all Compass employees, including directors and officers and all our majority-owned businesses, including subsidiaries and joint ventures. Our aim is to ensure that all employees and job applicants are given equal opportunity and that our organisation is representative of the communities in which we operate; that each employee is respected and valued and able to give their best as a result. Having people from diverse backgrounds in Compass is a huge strength for our businesses. For example, Black History Month was re-imagined as Black Future Month focusing on black inclusion and was celebrated with a series of events across the UK business including support from Non-Executive Director Arlene Isaacs-Lowe, who held roundtables with colleagues from the UK, US, Türkiye and UAE businesses.
At Compass Group USA, over 17,000 people completed DE&I training, and their Be the Difference conference in July 2023 was attended by more than 2,000 colleagues where they discussed empowering front line talent, exploring neurodiversity and the importance of allyship. In Belgium, Compass was awarded a diversity accreditation from the Brussels Employment Minister, as an employer which recognises, respects and values differences in the workplace. In Australia, Compass was ranked number one in the Indigenous Employment Index in 2022 and has introduced an Indigenous training programme leading to an accredited Cert III in hospitality, with a 97% success rate for completion and employment. With its embedded commitment to DE&I, Compass Canada has launched Stronger Together Compass, focusing on mental health and wellness through its Diversity and Inclusion Action Councils, to provide colleagues with a safe space for conversation, where they can access resources and support one another. In India, the business launched a new digital training module in the fight against sexual harassment with over 6,000 employees completing the training. Reinforcing its commitment to inclusivity in all talent areas, in February 2023, Compass UK&I became a patron of the Multicultural Apprenticeship Alliance, which partnered with Chartwells to launch the first Junior Chef Academy in Wales.
For the last four years, Compass Group USA’s Women in Culinary (WiC) programme has addressed inequalities and opportunity gaps within the hospitality industry by supporting women chefs with dedicated training, leadership development programmes and advancement opportunities. WiC is driving cultural change as well as career growth, igniting executive allyship and fostering kind kitchens. This year’s WiC showcase event was held in Dallas and encompassed International Women’s Day. The event gave a platform to exceptional female chefs from across Compass Group US businesses, displaying and celebrating their amazing talents.
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board | 38% | 33% |
| Executive Committee | 40% | 40% |
| Senior leaders | 34% | 37% |
| All management | 46% | 46% |
| Total workforce | 56% | 57% |
Nurturing our people throughout their career is important to us. We support the health and wellbeing of our people with programmes and initiatives designed to help them stay healthy, happy and secure because we care about the physical and mental wellbeing of our colleagues.
For the last four years, Compass Group USA’s Women in Culinary programme has addressed inequalities and opportunity gaps within the hospitality industry by supporting women chefs for dedicated training, leadership development programmes and advancement opportunities.
Compass Group USA has launched Health is Wealth, a programme focused on mental, physical, financial and nutritional health. More information on the Health is Wealth programme can be found on page 106.
In the UK&I, Compass provides free, easily accessible digital healthcare services to employees, including an annual health check, digital GP, second medical opinion, mental health therapists and nutritional consultations.
In the UAE, Compass has established the People Happiness Forum, giving everyone in the business a right to have their voice heard, with a platform to share their opinions. The ideas from the forum helped the business to win Gold for best company to work with, best recruitment strategy and best career development programme in the Plan3Media, Employee Happiness Summit Awards for UAE-based companies.
We recognise that household pressures can impact the wellbeing of our people. Compass Group USA and Compass UK&I help their people take better control of their financial commitments by enabling them to access their pay in advance of their normal payday, when they need it, as well as supporting healthy savings habits.
Compass UK&I provides around 200,000 free meals for colleagues every week and enhanced its Helping Hands hardship fund, providing emergency support grants to employees. Whilst Compass India’s We Care fund also provides an emergency backstop for employees when they need help.
As well as supporting our people directly, our businesses create positive social impact by investing in, and contributing to, the local communities in which they operate.
In the US, Compass’ Foodworks business has launched its IGNITE programme, offering grants to minority and women-owned business enterprises throughout the country. Foodworks helps these businesses purchase new equipment, expand operations and achieve necessary certifications.
Chartwells Higher Education in the US has launched an innovative Teaching Kitchens platform, with onsite culinary experts and registered dieticians to promote culinary and nutritional literacy. These events seek to foster culinary curiosity and encourage a sense of adventure. The Teaching Kitchens initiative helps improve productivity, creativity, morale and engagement with client wellness initiatives.# Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Compass’ businesses advocate at local, national, and international level to promote diversity, equity and inclusion across their operations, as well as through their business partners and suppliers. Compass Australia, is recognised as a leader in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander engagement through positive impact partnerships, respect and recognition through advocacy of The Voice to Parliament, and co-designing training and employment pathways for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Talent development and career opportunities remain key and are important to those who work in our businesses. We will continue to build out the Compass Academy concept and enhance career pathways in our businesses, with a particular focus on culinary and leadership skills. Employee engagement remains important and local strategies will seek to enhance the employee experience whilst also extending care programmes for employees during challenging times. Funding of local initiatives by The Compass Group Foundation will enable greater community impact across our businesses and increase our reach and impact on the social agenda.
Listening to colleagues through employee engagement surveys, townhalls, community meetings, social platforms and maintaining close relationships with formal employee representative groups and unions, are some of the ways employees can have their say on topics that matter most to them and helps them contribute to our strategy and success. This year’s global engagement survey heard the voices of 140,000 colleagues across 19 countries, with a 63% response rate (up from 54% last year) indicating enhanced engagement overall. Overall engagement scores held steady at 4.0 despite significantly higher participation levels from countries which have traditionally seen lower engagement. Eight out of 10 respondents agreed that they were treated fairly and with respect, felt part of a caring and positive team and were confident in the leadership of the business. Whilst there remains work to do on personal growth, we were pleased to see an overall improvement of 5% (to 70%) in respect of career prospects and opportunities. We were also pleased that overall engagement levels remained consistent despite the continued disruptive impact of external factors on our people’s lives and a decline in life satisfaction in general. We know that what matters most to our people is to feel valued and to be able to give their best. To ensure all our people feel part of our caring, winning culture, we must deliver on our commitments of Respect, Teamwork and Growth for everyone and continue in our mission to provide opportunities for all. Our Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, Ireena Vittal, hosted six roundtable sessions in the year with employees from 12 countries. These sessions provided insight into employee sentiment on topics ranging from culture and diversity to artificial intelligence, inflation, wellbeing and reward. Further details can be found on page 75.
| Award Name | Year | Organisation |
|---|---|---|
| Healthiest Employers®: Hall of Fame | 2023 | Compass Group USA |
| Living Wage Foundation: Recognised Service Provider Champion Awards | 2023 | Compass Group UK&I |
| Newsweek: America’s Greatest Workplaces for Diversity | 2023 | Compass Group USA |
| Fortune: World’s Most Admired Companies | 2023 | Compass Group PLC |
| Forbes: America’s Best Large Employers | 2023 | Compass Group USA |
| Multicultural Apprenticeship Awards: Retail, Hospitality & Tourism Employer | 2023 | Compass Group UK&I |
| International Association for Food Protection (IAFP): Black Pearl Award | 2023 | Compass Group USA |
| Brussels Economy and Employment Ministry: Diversity Accreditation | 2022 | Compass Group Belgium |
37
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
We have taken the next step on our journey to reach climate net zero by 2050 by partnering with leading climate management platform Planet FWD. It was a big step, enabling us to improve our methodology for measuring emissions and enhancing the quality of our data for the supply chain (Scope 3) which generates most of our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Our total Scope 3 emissions for 2022 were calculated using data from our top four markets – the US, UK, France and Australia representing 78% of our global revenues – using a hybrid volume and spend approach, and extrapolated to our smaller markets. We particularly focused on increasing data quality for purchased goods, the most significant source of emissions. The project to transition from spend to volume took six months to complete which has necessitated the use of 2022 data for reporting this year. This improvement in data quality has resulted in more granular estimates of food-related emissions and lower emissions estimates for 2022. There is more to do, but we are making great progress and tackling Scope 3 emissions will remain one of our top sustainability priorities.
38
Strategic report
Our Planet Promise encompasses our values as an ethical, sustainable and inclusive business, together with our ambition to have a positive impact on the world. As well as being the right thing to do, this mission is also key to our growth aspirations and our long-term success. Our ability to demonstrate progress in reducing our carbon impact and food waste is helping us attract new clients, who rely on us as a trusted partner to help them achieve their sustainability goals. Together with Compass, clients and consumers in every market can navigate towards a less wasteful, healthier, plant-forward lifestyle. In September, we hosted our inaugural Sustainability Deep Dive; a virtual event providing institutional investors, analysts and other key stakeholders with an opportunity to enhance their understanding of the Group’s sustainability strategy, climate net zero progress, and operational innovations towards a more sustainable future for all. Our actions are guided by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), especially those where we can have the greatest impact: carbon reduction, food waste, animal welfare, a reduction in high-emission products, and care for the health and wellbeing of our people and consumers. In a global market, it is inevitable that some regions and countries will move faster than others towards our pledge of climate net zero by 2050. Compass UK&I is leading the industry and has committed to achieving climate net zero by 2030. The UK&I are working with external partners to support their strategy, such as leading University of Oxford expert, Professor Sir Charles Godfray FRS, who is supporting them to shape and deliver their climate ambitions. Data transparency is embedded in our philosophy and our Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) report (see pages 45 to 54) includes disclosure of our climate-related risks and opportunities for 2023.
We are investing in technology to ensure decision making is supported by data-driven insights across all areas of our sustainability strategy. Our businesses are providing clients with dashboards to visualise progress across the ESG metrics that are important to them with data provided by tools such as Waste Not 2.0, our proprietary food waste tracking technology, and via Planet FWD, a leading climate management platform. We continue to make investments to support our own ambitious goals, including enhancing our management of supply chain risks using the Supplier Ethical Data Exchange (Sedex) platform. In September 2022, the Group issued fixed-rate sustainable bonds of €500m (£434m) and £250m maturing in 2030 and 2032, respectively. The proceeds of the bonds have to be allocated to expenditure on Eligible Sustainable Projects in line with the Compass Group Sustainable Financing Framework during the three years before, and two years after, the date of issue. See more at www.compass-group.com/en/media/news/2022/ compass-group-issues-first-sustainable-bonds.html
Our ability to demonstrate progress in reducing our carbon impact and food waste is helping us attract new clients, who rely on us as a trusted partner to help them achieve their sustainability goals.
Reducing food waste is one of the greatest environmental challenges facing our sector and therefore one where we have the greatest potential to make a significant difference. Our culinary teams and front line staff are instrumental in tackling this challenge, employing a range of diverse food waste reduction technologies across their businesses. This year, we made food waste reduction our top priority. Our target was to adopt food waste tracking technology in 6,000 locations and, with every region united in support, we achieved 7,943 locations, proudly surpassing our 2023 target – which is linked to an element of the annual bonus plan of executive directors and senior management. In 2022, we launched Waste Not 2.0 – our proprietary, tablet-based, online tracking tool for chefs – and have since rolled it out across 12 countries in nine languages. Waste Not 2.0 enables kitchen teams to identify opportunities to minimise food waste beyond the usual trim, bones, core and peel waste. Using the tool’s analytics, managers can evaluate data, quantify, and report on the carbon footprint of kitchen waste, leveraging this information to reduce or avoid future wastage.Shelley Roberts
Group Chief Commercial Officer with responsibility for Health, Safety and Sustainability
39Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
39
Stop Food Waste Day, our global day of action received over 93 million impressions on social media. Strong progress on our contribution to goal 12 of the UN SDGs with our commitment to reduce food waste by 50% by 2030 supported by our investment and deployment of food waste tracking technology. Food waste measured at almost 8,000 sites supported by a performance measure within the executive director and senior management annualbonus plan. Investment in proprietary food waste measurement technology Waste Not 2.0 which has been deployed in 12 countries and is available in nine languages. A new training experience focused on food waste reductions named Chefs Creating Change was built and delivered by our Global Culinary Forum, inspiring onsite actions that can be taken by our chefs back to their units. Working alongside ReFED in the US, a non-profit partner dedicated to ending food loss and waste, our US business has integrated enhanced analytics data to enable Waste Not 2.0 to report the water and carbon impact of the food waste being generated at site level. Food waste reduction highlights.
Purpose continued
40
Strategic report
As a global leader in food service, Compass is uniquely positioned to raise awareness and make a positive impact on the reduction of food waste throughout the sector. Compass USA launched Stop Food Waste Day (SFWD) in 2017, and the event is now the largest annual global day of action in the fight against food waste. SFWD not only draws attention to the problem but also engages and educates colleagues in the sector by sharing practical, creative and impactful ways to change behaviour and stop food waste. It also brings together consumers, businesses, not-for-profit organisations and government entities and encourages them to tackle the problem on a global scale. This year, SFWD reached people in over 70 different countries, as well as being celebrated by units in all of our operating markets. It included themed menus, consumer pledges, recipe videos, and the launch of the second Stop Food Waste Day online cookbook, which received impressive engagement, as evidenced by more than 16,000 reads and 68,000 impressions. The campaign resonated widely, reaching over 93 million people through a variety of media, and achieved 26 million views on X (formerly known as Twitter) alone; whilst Compass Group USA generated further engagement by hosting a SWFD live session featuring renowned food waste experts and leaders. Chefs across the Group are leading transformative sustainability efforts within the food industry from the bottom-up, and this year we held our first Global Culinary Forum, named Chefs Creating Change, which tackled the pivotal issue of food waste, and provided a platform for front line teams to come together, deepen their understanding of food waste reduction, and exchange expertise in areas such as procurement, inventory management, menu creation and the application of technology. This ground-breaking event, conducted across four time zones, engaged approximately 3,000 chefs in the largest ever gathering of Compass culinary experts worldwide.
Menu reformulation
Creating climate-friendly and healthy menus that appeal to consumers is key to driving forward our sustainability agenda. Our culinary experts, registered dieticians, operators and marketing teams across the Group work together to ensure they deliver what their clients and consumers desire. Drawing upon our exceptional culinary expertise, we stand at the forefront of the industry, capable of delivering delicious meals that harmoniously blend flavour and health benefits. As the regulatory landscape evolves, we continue to provide food that encourages healthier eating for our clients. Our recent Global Eating at Work survey revealed that 49% of our younger consumers are expressing a heightened demand for plant-based options. Our approach replaces high-impact proteins such as beef and lamb with chicken and sustainable fish. We incorporate minimally processed plant-based foods without compromising on flavour, use less red meat, and blend animal protein with vegetables. Additionally, we position climate-friendly dishes prominently on menus to normalise their consumption without explicitly labelling them as vegetarian or vegan. We are proud to be a member of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and by co-chairing the Positive Consumption action area we are donating our time to develop a behaviour change toolkit for the participating food service members. The project is driving food systems transformation by developing solutions that support healthy people on a healthy planet. Our chefs are leveraging behavioural change strategies using nudging techniques to steer consumers towards healthier options. This gives us an invaluable opportunity to foster a broader acceptance of nutritious, sustainably-sourced and plant-forward, nutritious dishes. Our behavioural change strategies include:
Our culinary experts strategically blend various levers for enhanced impact. For example, by combining choice architecture with financial incentives in a US manufacturing plant, the business was able to shift total purchases of healthy options from less than 30% to more than 45%, and nudged beverage selection to 92% ‘better for you’ options.
Supplier initiatives
Close collaboration with suppliers is essential on our journey to climate net zero, because we know this goal cannot be achieved in isolation. We are actively leveraging our scale as a significant buyer of food in our ongoing drive towards decarbonisation, and see great potential for progress in working towards this shared goal with our partners. For example, since January 2023, Compass UK&I has mandated that all new contracts require suppliers to set Science-Based Targets (SBTs) within 12 months of a contractual start date. This is supplemented with relevant KPIs related to sourcing, packaging and water consumption. By integrating multiple aspects of sustainability into their tendering process, our UK&I business has emphasised its dedication to sustainable procurement while meeting rapidly evolving industry requirements. In May, the first Future Forward meeting was held in the US by our US businesses’ procurement arm, Foodbuy. This enabled Compass Group USA and their Foodbuy leaders to collaborate with some of their supplier partners on the future of sustainability within the food supply chain. Presentations were made by major suppliers setting out strategies to reduce GHG emissions from the farm level right through to the packaging and distribution of the finished product. Several Foodbuy member representatives attended, offering valuable insights from an operational standpoint. During the year, over 450 suppliers, clients and colleagues attended the Foodbuy Conference 2023 at ExCeL London, a full-day event with a strong focus on sustainability, culminating in a gala awards dinner. The conference offered attendees an exclusive insight into the journeyFoodbuy UK is on as a business, and what it has planned forthe year ahead. In the US, 300 people attended the Foodbuy US summit in Nashville, Tennessee, including the Compass US and Foodbuy leadership team and many of their major suppliers. There was a strong emphasis on sustainability throughout the presentations, which included an address from our Global Director of Sustainability.
Carbon reduction
Most of Compass Group’s GHG emissions are Scope 3, for which we are indirectly responsible. Our work with Planet FWD, a leading carbon management consultancy specialising in the food and agriculture industry, on measuring our Scope 3 emissions for 2022 (see page 38) is giving us valuable information which better enables us to work withsuppliers to reduce the emissions of the Group’s products andservices.
41Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Purpose continued
Our purchased goods emissions (Scope 3, category 1) decreased significantly against our 2019 baseline, as we evolved our approach from spend-based assessments to volume-based assessments. This isan important step which allows us to identify and take action on emissions reductions with greater accuracy than with a spend-based approach. Improving data accuracy to report Scope 3 emissions was a six month process, resulting in 2022 emissions reported in this year. However, our 2019 assessment had underestimated energy usage in client kitchens, which have subsequently increased in 2022, offsetting emissions reductions achieved in purchased goods, resulting in an overall emissions decrease of 12%. The Group has targeted a 28% reduction in our absolute Scope 3 GHG emissions from all purchased food and drink by 2030, from a base year of 2019 - a goal approved by the SBTi.We will deliver this by focusing on food waste reduction, training our teams, reformulating our menus and working closely with our suppliers to explore new sustainable business practices. Moving to a volume-based approach and further developing our understanding of granular estimates of food-related emissions will help us achieve our target, with a reduction in emissions coming from product mix and sourcing opportunities. We are also working to align with the new Forest, Land and Agriculture (FLAG) guidance under the SBTi in 2024. The next phase of our journey with Planet FWD is to utilise its industry-leading technology to manage our data when reporting emissions across our largest markets, to enable greater collaboration with clients in support of carbon-reduction initiatives. We are also investing in technology to influence consumer behaviour at the point of purchase, through carbon labelling with market-leading providers such as Foodsteps and HowGood. Carbon labelling scores food on whether it has a higher or lower environmental impact, based on the total GHG emissions generated from the extraction of raw materials to end of life.
Compass Group PLC is required to report its global and UK energy use and carbon emissions in accordance with the Companies (Directors’ Report) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Energy and Carbon Report) Regulations 2018. The data reported in these tables represent emissions and energy use for which Compass Group PLC is responsible and is incorporated by reference in the Directors’ report on pages 56 to 130. To calculate our Group emissions, we have used the main requirements of the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard along with the UK Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting 2023. We monitor the energy usage and GHG emissions of our owned and operated sites across 28 countries (2022: 29), which represent 98% of the Group’s underlying revenue (2022: 98%).
| For the year ended 30 Sept 2023 | For the year ended 30 Sept 2022 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK and offshore 1 | Global | UK and offshore 1 | Global (certain data restated) | |
| Scope 1 – Emissions from the combustion of fuel or the operation of any facility, including fugitive emissions from refrigerants use | tCO 2 e 1,934 | 147,282 | 3,881 | 137,985 3 |
| Scope 2 – Emissions resulting from the purchase of electricity, heat, steam or cooling (location-based) | tCO 2 e 2,497 | 49,714 | 2,385 | 46,807 |
| Scope 2 – Emissions resulting from the purchase of electricity, heat, steam or cooling (market-based) | tCO 2 e 268 | 50,104 | 1,047 | 47,071 |
| Total gross emissions (location-based) | tCO 2 e 4,431 | 196,996 | 6,266 | 184,792 3 |
| tCO 2 e (location based) per million £ turnover | 1.9 | 6.4 | 3.2 | 7.3 3 |
| Energy consumption used to calculate above emissions/kWh | 21,194,715 | 786,600,491 | 31,837,141 | 737,653,482 3 |
turnover is calculated by dividing our total gross emissions (location based) by underlying revenue 2 for the countries monitored. Our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions have been externally verified by a third-party, and we will continue to verify this data in the coming years. See more at www.compass-group.com/en/sustainability/performance-and-reports.html
Our absolute emissions have increased year-on-year as Compass continued to successfully win new business across all regions, and, by the end of the year, revenues grew significantly. However, we are still making good progress in delivering our commitments and have already reduced our Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 10% compared with a 2019 baseline. When normalised by revenue we have seen a 12% year-on-year reduction in our GHG emissions ratio. Our UK emissions have fallen as a result of a robust set of actions to deliver carbon reduction initiatives, including the implementation of renewable electricity and energy efficiency solutions across our direct operations.
Across Europe, we continue to make good progress, led by Compass UK&I, which is continuing to implement its 100% electric vehicle policy. This year, Compass Spain has initiated projects including the installation of solar panels at their head office site and is also transitioning its fleet to electric vehicles. In the US, SCS Global Services have certified Canteen’s largest Californian branch as carbon neutral for Scope 1 and 2 emissions, marking a major step towards Canteen’s commitment to achieving climate net zero by 2030. The branch team achieved this goal by completing a comprehensive GHG inventory of their operations, identifying emission hotspots and reduction targets, introducing electric delivery trucks to reduce emissions, improving energy efficiency, reducing overall waste, and investing in credible carbon mitigation projects to offset the remainder of its emissions.
Compass is contributing towards building a more circular economy, in which materials can be reused or recirculated to keep them in use as long as possible and to minimise waste. In Europe, for example, our businesses are reducing the use of unnecessary single-use plastic to a level below that required by the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive. Reducing unnecessary single-use plastics at scale can help drive behavioural change in employees and clients, which we hope they will carry into other areas of their work and home lives.
Strategic report 42
Reducing single-use materials, specifically unnecessary plastic, is an industry-wide challenge that requires collaboration across the value chain. In response to this challenge, Compass USA co-founded the Single-Use Materials Decelerator (SUM’d), a non-profit, cross-sector group of NGOs and technical experts working to reduce reliance on single-use materials in the food industry. Together, they built the Understanding Packaging Scorecard, a simple, free tool to assess the sustainability impact of common food-service packages. To learn more, read the SUM’d case study at www.upscorecard.org/compass-case-study/
Current sustainable plastics initiatives include:
Procurement teams are focused on several initiatives to make a positive impact on the planet and the communities that our businesses are part of. Sourcing local products, building an inclusive and diverse supplier base, supporting regenerative agriculture, demanding high animal welfare standards, protecting human rights and promoting ethical trade, are key strategic imperatives which drive the bottom line whilst enhancing our brands. These initiatives together with our animal welfare and palm oil commitments also drive impact beyond our business.
The next phase of our journey with Planet FWD is to utilise its industry-leading technology to manage our data when reporting emissions across our largest markets, to enable greater collaboration with clients in support of carbon reduction initiatives.
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 43
Purpose continued
We are committed to upholding the Five Freedoms of animal welfare: freedom from hunger and thirst; from pain, injury and disease; from fear and distress; from discomfort; and freedom to express normal behaviour.# Our Impact
Our businesses track animal welfare in every country we operate in, and work with their supply partners to make progress and address challenges. As a founding member of the Global Coalition for Animal Welfare (GCAW), we are working pre-competitively with other leading international food companies. Together, we collectively address systemic barriers to change, share best practices and make progress on key animal welfare issues at a faster pace than would otherwise be possible. In 2023, GCAW’s focus has been on improving welfare for laying hens, broiler chickens and pigs. Compass’ global footprint means our businesses face unique regional and local challenges. To better understand and overcome these we engage closely with several global, regional, and country-focused NGOs. These partnerships have proved valuable in helping drive welfare standards.
We are working collaboratively with clients, suppliers and other third parties to continue building a more diverse, equitable and inclusive supplier base. In the year under review, we started to collect more data from our operating companies to help us identify opportunities to increase our impact. We have partnered with: Minority Supplier Development UK, which champion ethnic-minority-owned businesses in the UK; WeConnect, which amplifies the presence of female business owners and helps them compete in the global marketplace, and; in the US, with Disability:In the leading non-profit resource for business disability inclusion. All three organisations are helping us to further identify and support diverse suppliers. In the US the Foodbuy Diverse Supplier Accelerator Program, now in its third year, was created to offer a broad range of services and resources to assist the growth of diverse suppliers. This initiative focuses on 10 new women and minority-owned businesses each year, providing them with mentors, education sessions, and industry connection opportunities.
Led by the Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) Committee, over the past year we have continued to strengthen our approach to identifying and mitigating business integrity, human rights, and environmental risks in our supply chains. Given the size and complexity of the Group’s businesses and their supply chains, a risk-based approach is taken and we continue to invest in education, awareness, technology, partnerships, and training to ensure due diligence processes continue to evolve. The Group’s Global Supplier Code of Conduct (SCOC), launched in 2022, is an essential part of the contractual requirements for all suppliers. It sets out the principles, expectations and behaviours we require our supply chain partners to adhere to in areas of business integrity and ethical principles, human rights and labour standards, health and safety, and sustainability. Sedex has now been adopted by 14 countries (including all top 10 markets by revenue), providing data on ethical practices for supplier sites in 54 countries. We have also introduced a new Third-Party Integrity Due Diligence process, piloted in 10 countries. We have continued our partnerships with Earthworm Foundation and Slave-Free Alliance, whilst our US business continues to support the Coalition of Immokalee Workers’ Fair Food Program. Learnings gained through these partnerships have been shared internally and with suppliers to expand understanding and increase our impact. Our Human Rights Working Group has been a powerful forum for sharing best practice throughout our regions. See page 35 for more information.
We want to take care of the communities where our businesses are based in ways that make a real difference to each individual community. Locally-made investments have substantially benefited many local food producers and small-scale ventures that have partnered with Compass because they share our values. Our businesses use their skills and resources to provide donations of food where it is most needed, support charity projects that can change lives, and advocate for social enterprises that seek to make lasting change for the better.
Donating good-quality food, that would otherwise go to waste to those in need is not only sustainable, it is the right thing to do. Compass businesses work with food recovery partners in all our markets to make sure good food reaches people in food poverty. They donate where they can have the greatest impact, from supporting local community food banks and food pantries to participating in child meal programmes. During the year, Compass businesses donated over 1.6 million meals to their local communities. Food Fleet is a dynamic mobile food provider and management company in our North America business, in Hawaii. During the year, Food Fleet worked closely with the Wave Foundation and We Do Better Relief alongside suppliers, vendors and chefs to deliver essential assistance to the Maui community, which was severely affected by wildfires on the island.
One of our US businesses, Wolfgang Puck Catering, actively collaborates with a range of small-scale ventures and food producers that work to foster positive social change. One such enterprise is Scott Family Farms, a third-generation family business, which aims to mentor black farmers and reshape farming for black communities. Wolfgang Puck Catering also collaborates with Homeboy Industries in East Los Angeles, the world’s largest gang intervention and rehabilitation programme, providing resources to help rebuild the lives of former gang members. Another US community venture, Foodworks, has introduced its IGNITE programme; a community initiative, which provides grants to minority and women-owned businesses across the US. Foodworks offers small business coaching, quality assurance training, marketing assistance and extensive exposure to partners nationwide to facilitate the rapid expansion of local restaurants.
In the UK, The Compass Group Foundation supports the charity FoodCycle, which runs a network of community kitchens, using surplus produce which would otherwise go to waste. In Australia, Compass Group has partnered with Foodbuy Australia as well as Bridging the Gap Foundation (founded by Menzies School of Health and Science Research), which has been granted seed funding by the Foundation to pilot a Nutritional Hunger Program (NHP). The NHP aims to end nutritional hunger in remote Indigenous communities by co-designing a programme with local Indigenous community leaders to find solutions to get high-quality, nutritious food to Indigenous communities at reasonable prices. Training and education will also be provided to various community groups and members, including store owners, in areas of food production, sanitisation, cooking, inventory management and healthy choices for better health outcomes. See page 33 for more information about the Foundation.
44 Strategic report
We set out below our climate-related financial disclosures, which are consistent with the four pillars and 11 recommended disclosures of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, including the TCFD all-sector guidance, and in compliance with the requirements of LR 9.8.6R.(8) (UK Listing Rules). This disclosure also complies with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as amended by the Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 2022.
Without coordinated action, climate change poses a significant risk to our planet, people and economies. For the global food system, on which we all rely, rising global temperatures, water stress and extreme weather events can disrupt supply chains, reduce crop yields and damage community livelihoods. However, for those who drive innovation and take a leadership position on sustainability, there are also significant opportunities. As a Group, we are proud of the work we are doing in partnership with our clients to support our shared climate goals. Sustainability is intrinsic to the way we conduct business and our long-term success, while also being deeply ingrained in our culture, from our chefs to our executive leadership. We have many tried-and-tested operational levers at our disposal to help mitigate supply chain disruptions resulting from climate change, through our procurement scale, sourcing flexibility, menu management and culinary and digital innovation. There is no single solution to this global challenge, and we are making many incremental changes across thousands of our units and throughout our businesses’ supply chains. To tackle climate change, it is vital that we measure, track and understand how climate change impacts our operations, our clients and our strategy. The purpose of this TCFD statement is to provide investors and wider stakeholders with a better understanding of our exposure and strategic resilience to climate-related risks, and to enable us to identify climate- related opportunities that are material to the Group. We consider all risks and opportunities evaluated in this statement to be industry-wide, applying to each of our sectors, our competitors and other key stakeholders. Our analysis comprises three climate scenarios (1.5°C, 2.5°C and 4°C) for which we have considered physical risks, transition risks and related opportunities.This year, our third year of disclosure, we have materially expanded the scope of our scenario analysis in four key areas:
We also included a broader range of internal and external stakeholders in our scenario analysis, including external climate resilience experts. This enhanced engagement identified four specific risks as the most relevant physical climate-related risks, and these were the focus of our quantitative scenario analysis. Based on our modelling this year, the most significant financial impact, whilst still moderate, arises from chronic water stress in the US and Australia in 2050, with beef and dairy production likely to be most impacted by climate change. These findings are consistent with our strategy to build competitive sourcing programmes in alternative food categories such as meatless proteins, and to nudge consumers towards diets that are more planet-friendly. Consequently, we are confident in our ability to mitigate the impact of this risk.
Last year we modelled transition risks, which identified carbon taxation in the US (in a low-carbon scenario) as the most significant potential impact. We believe this conclusion continues to be relevant this year and we remain confident in our ability to manage the financial risk under this scenario, with the net impact expected to be immaterial.
We are dedicating significant resources to acquiring and implementing cutting-edge technologies to enhance our sustainability services for clients and to maximise the opportunities that we anticipate will arise from the climate transition. This includes strategic investment in our monitoring and measurement capabilities, which enable our businesses to offer in-depth and tailored roadmaps for their clients, while positioning the Group as a trusted partner in helping them achieve their own sustainability goals. Furthermore, we recognise the important role we can play – through direct engagement and close collaboration with our businesses’ supply chain partners – in creating a low-carbon supply chain that is fit for the future. In 2023, this was a focus area during the Future Forward day that we hosted with key suppliers to our businesses in the US. In the UK, it is now a requirement for all suppliers to set their own science-based targets, in line with Compass’ own commitments. This is also extensively discussed in the supplier conferences that our various markets host each year.
Despite significantly expanding our analysis this year, we recognise that scenario analysis is limited by the availability of data on the long-term impacts of climate change, and our disclosures will need to evolve as data availability improves. We are committed to working with experts to continue to review the scope of our analysis and evolve our process in future years. The analysis shown in this disclosure was completed in 2023, with the exception of the quantitative scenario analysis on carbon taxation, which was completed in 2022. The qualitative and quantitative scenario analysis will be repeated at a minimum every three years in line with the relevant regulations.
Compass has well-established governance structures designed to effectively oversee the management of its principal risks, including climate change risks and opportunities. Principal risks are reviewed biannually by the Board. Climate change is a principal risk and it was embedded into our risk management processes in 2021 (see page 26).
Climate-related risks and opportunities are overseen and managed at the highest levels of the Company through the following governance structures and processes:
| Board | Corporate Responsibility Committee | Audit Committee | Executive management # 47 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
These three climate scenarios, which are explained in more detail in the table below, were chosen by our specialist internal team, which includes representatives from the Sustainability, Finance, Commercial and Procurement functions, in consultation with our expert external partners.
| Scenario Key attributes | Rationale for inclusion | Pathway to cost increase |
|---|---|---|
| Scenario A – 1.5°C by 2100 (SSP 1/ RCP 2.6 combination) The world takes rapid and drastic action to limit global warming and meet the ambition of the 2015 Paris Agreement: – coordinated action across public and private sectors – low-carbon technologies take over from fossil fuels – shift in consumer demand and preferences towards low-carbon products and services |
A < 2°C scenario is required by TCFD. This scenario allows Compass to explore transition risks in key markets, consider changes in consumer and client preferences and understand competitor and stakeholder pressures. | Increase in sourcing costs due to carbon pricing on agricultural (farm to farm gate) and freight emissions. |
| Scenario B – 2.5°C by 2100 (SSP 2/ RCP 4.5 combination) The world follows a path in which social, economic and technological trends do not shift markedly from historical patterns: – development and income growth proceeds unevenly – middle-of-the-road emissions with inconsistent technological process – global and national institutions work towards, but make slow progress in, achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals |
This scenario allows Compass to prepare for a disorderly transition away from fossil fuels. Under this 2.5°C scenario, Compass examines both physical and transition risks and opportunities. | Increase in sourcing costs due to carbon pricing on agricultural (farm to farm gate) and freight emissions, and production losses leading to higher procurement costs. |
| Scenario C – 4°C by 2100 (SSP 5/ RCP 8.5 combination) The world continues to use fossil fuels as the engine of economic growth, resulting in worst-case levels of global warming: – severe and frequent extreme weather, with chronic changes to seasonal weather patterns – extensive business disruption, severely damaging economic growth – protectionist government policies to build resilience to climate change |
This scenario allows Compass to assess the impact of acute and chronic physical climate-related risks and opportunities on the business, supply chain, supplier network, and stakeholders. | Loss in production leads to higher procurement costs due to the costs involved in switching sourcing. No carbon, plastic or food tax is assumed. |
We consider three time horizons – three years (short-term), four to 10 years (medium-term) and greater than 10 years (long-term) – to be the relevant time horizons for our scenario analysis, with the assumption that climate-related issues often manifest themselves over the medium to long-term.
To understand the impacts of physical and transition risks and opportunities in greater depth, the scope of the scenario analysis was expanded this year to include consideration of four countries (2022: 1) and seven product categories (2022: 6). Our business model in all sectors is very similar, hence we do not believe there would be any material differences in the outcomes if we considered different sectors in this exercise.
The Geographic Scope of the expanded scenario analysis was determined on the basis of both materiality (with the US, UK, Australia and France representing 78% of the Group’s underlying revenue in 2023) and reach (with each of our reporting regions – North America, Europe and Rest of World – represented in the analysis). The balance of our underlying revenue comprises multiple countries, with no individual country representing more than 4% of the Group’s total underlying revenue in the year.
The product focus for the scenario analysis was protein (beef, pork, poultry and dairy), produce (fruit and vegetables) and in addition, this year, beverages. Together, these products represent more than 60% of the total MAP 3 food spend in 2023 in the four in-scope countries.
Building on the work conducted in 2022, a long-list of climate-related risks and opportunities was identified using the climate scenarios mentioned above. Their impacts on the business were discussed with business leaders and management across the markets in scope for the assessment. Workshops with our specialist internal teams, market representatives, Group senior management and external climate resilience experts were held to qualitatively assess each climate- related risk and opportunity to determine the possible operational and financial impacts. Participants included representatives from the Sustainability, Finance, Commercial and Procurement functions. The likelihood and impact of the risks were ranked to determine a list of relevant transition and physical climate-related risks and opportunities.
The process of understanding our risk exposure and impact has been incremental. This year’s in-depth analysis of physical risks has provided Compass with granular insight into how the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities varies across specific geographies in each time horizon. The table on pages 49 and 50 summarises the climate-related risks and opportunities identified during the qualitative scenario analysis and, for each one, shows the potential impact, geographical exposure and time horizon during which the impact is expected to materialise.
Climate-related risks and opportunities are continuously reviewed together with other business risks as part of our biannual Major Risk Assessment (MRA) process. Climate-related risks and opportunities are assessed based on their potential impact on profit before interest and tax (PBIT) in accordance with the criteria set out in the Board- approved Risk Management Policy (see page 26). The table also highlights for each risk the combination of strategic business model levers and operational measures available to the Group to mitigate the impact of the risks and to seize the opportunities identified. Many of these levers and operational measures are ones we regularly deploy and, based on our experience, will allow us to mitigate the impacts to levels deemed minor or negligible.
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures continued
Multiple material levers we can use to mitigate these risks
The table below shows the relevant physical and transition risks and opportunities identified for Compass, including an assessment of potential impact, likely time horizon and geographic exposure.
| Risk/opportunity and time horizon | Description and impact | Exposure | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute physical risks | |||
| Extreme heat and drought (S) | Increased extreme heat and drought events | Transportation disruptions, crop stress leading to reduced yields and/or catastrophic crop failure, raw material shortages and increased operating costs. Transportation routes in the Australian market are vulnerable to disruption from wildfires. | US, UK, Australia and France – flexible menu planning arrangements that allow our businesses to select local, seasonal and readily available ingredients – minimising food waste to maximise value of limited resources – strategic diversification of suppliers and sourcing regions to reduce reliance on single-source ingredients – increased use of alternative farming methods (e.g. indoor vertical farming) |
| Extreme weather events (L) | Increased flooding, hurricanes and cyclones | Increased crop stress, reducing yields and/ or catastrophic crop failure from flooding, and distribution-network failures from weather damage (due to flooding, hurricanes and cyclones) to public infrastructure, disrupting operations and sourcing while increasing operating costs. | US, UK, Australia and France – flexible menu planning – minimising food waste – strategic diversification of suppliers and sourcing regions – flexible contractual terms with suppliers to manage and mitigate short-term disruption – contingency planning and rapid response to emergency situations (e.g. the Emergency Preparedness team in the US) |
| Chronic physical risks | |||
| Extreme heat (L) | Increased global temperatures leading to climate-related health impacts, diseases and pests | Increased range, spread and distribution of weeds, disease, pests and fungi, reducing crop yields. Extreme heat and disease leading to cow weight loss and lower milk production. Increased exposure of agricultural workers to extreme heat in Australia and US, limiting operational hours and increasing operating and key input costs for farmers. | Global – market-based initiatives to support farmers (e.g. Compass US supporting the Carolina Farm Stewardship Association to provide advice and support to small farmers), focusing on sustainable farming practices and climate resilience – strategic diversification of suppliers and sourcing regions – increased use of alternative farming methods (e.g. |
Each of the risks and opportunities identified during the qualitative scenario analysis was considered for quantification based on the level of risk identified, its likelihood and the additional insight that would be gained from quantification. We continue to enhance our risk management and climate change decision-making processes and, consistent with the qualitative scenario analysis, have extended our modelling to short, medium and long-term timeframes (2025, 2030 and 2050) and four countries (US, UK, Australia and France). Last year, only one timeframe (2030) and one country (US) were considered. This year, we have focused our analysis on the four most relevant physical climate risks identified during the qualitative scenario analysis: acute drought and heat events, and chronic water stress and temperature increases. These have been modelled under the three climate scenarios, A, B and C, explained on page 47, across the relevant markets and each of the short, medium and long-term timeframes.
| Risk Type | Description | Impact | Country | Focus area | Cost impact 1 – 2025/2030 | Cost impact 1 – 2050 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (1.5° C) | B (2.5° C) | C (4° C) | A (1.5° C) | B (2.5° C) | C (4° C) | |||||
| Drought | Acute Prolonged period of abnormally low rainfall leading to a shortage of water | Crop stress leading to reduced yields | US, UK, Australia and France | Poultry, pork, produce | Extreme heat | Acute Prolonged period of abnormally high surface temperatures | Crop stress leading to crop failure | US, UK, Australia and France | Poultry, pork, produce | Extreme heat |
Potential unmitigated annual food cost increase:
The chronic risks were only modelled for the US and Australia on the basis that only these countries are expected to experience temperature increases at levels that will impact livestock and milk production. Last year, in addition to physical risks, we also modelled transition risks relating to taxation. As we consider that the conclusions of that analysis remain relevant this year, they have not been re-modelled. The food products selected for the quantitative scenario analysis remain consistent with last year, with protein (beef, dairy, poultry and pork) and produce (fruit and vegetables) continuing to be the focus of our modelling. The table below shows the results of this year’s quantitative scenario analysis in respect of physical risks, together with last year’s low-carbon transition scenario. We are confident that our strategic business model levers and operational measures will allow us to mitigate the impacts to levels deemed minor or negligible.
Key assumptions – it is assumed that the price elasticity of food products is 100%, i.e. when the yield decreases by 1, the price increases by 1 – it is assumed that the price elasticity of poultry and pork feed is 50%, i.e. when the price of feed increases by 1, the price of poultry and pork increases by 0.5.
S Short M Medium L Long-term
1 2 32 4 The four specific risks identified by the Group as the most relevant physical climate-related risks.
– the output of the analysis is an estimated cost increase assuming no volume changes from 2022 levels and no changes in business activities.
| Risk/opportunity | Time horizon | Description and impact | Exposure | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transition risks continued | ||||
| Market (M) | Changing consumer preferences and behaviours away from animal proteins (meat and dairy) | Reduced demand for certain products, services and menus, and impact on competitive market position due to shifts in consumer preferences. | US and UK | – continued menu reformulation to reduce animal protein on the plate – reducing food waste – industry-leading plant-forward training for our chefs – expanding use of technology and consumer apps to display carbon labelling – working with suppliers on new plant-forward options and reduced-carbon ingredients – strategically building competitive sourcing programmes in alternative protein categories |
| Policy and legal (S/M) | Regulation on plastic and food waste | Increased cost of use (through increased taxation or ban on use) and disposal of plastics leading to loss of revenue and increased regulatory disciplinary action. Fines due to inefficient food waste management, increasing operating costs. | Global | – application of technology to measure our food waste footprint (on track to halve food waste across our global operations by 2030) – exploring and implementing solutions to move away from single-use and fossil-fuel based plastics (e.g. in Australia, Compass has already made the transition ahead of federal and state legislation) |
| Opportunities | ||||
| Resource efficiency (M) | Reduction in food waste across all operations | Cost reductions and reputational benefits resulting in increased demand for goods/ services and increasing revenue. | Global | – continued rollout of and investment in proprietary technology to measure our food waste footprint (e.g.Waste Not 2.0) – food waste KPI added to executive annual bonus plan – food reclamation partnerships to repurpose food waste into meals for community support |
| Market (S) | Shift in consumer preferences towards plant-based menus and products | Opportunity to become a market leader in plant-based meals, resulting in increased demand and increasing revenues. | Global | – continue to expand our offer of healthy, lower-carbon, plant-based menu items, reformulating menus in line with our plant-forward strategy – increase share of seasonal and locally-sourced products – use of eco-labels to accelerate the transition and position Compass as a market leader |
| Resilience (M) | Use of operational and strategic levers such as procurement scale, menu management, and culinary and digital innovation to mitigate climate-related supply chain disruptions | Higher availability of products compared to competitors, and increasing consequentrevenues. | Global | – expand use of existing operational and strategic leversglobally – leverage global procurement strategy to reduce exposure to fluctuations in raw material costs – flexible menu planning and pricing |
| Energy sourcing (M) | Use of lower emission sources of energy, switch to renewable electricity across all operations and transitioning of all fleet vehicles to 100% plug-in electric | Reduced exposure to fossil fuel prices, andlower operating costs. | Global | – continue seeking to improve operational efficiency and use new technologies that emerge as the sector transitions to a low-carbon economy – increasing adoption of 100% plug-in electric vehicles by our businesses – our businesses in the UK and France have already adopted 100% renewable energy, while other markets have begun the transition |
| Physical opportunity (L) | Crop diversification and increasing local sourcing (especially in higher latitudes) | Increased growth viability resulting in reduced logistical emissions and costs. | Global | – allocation of funding towards new production techniques such as regenerative agriculture, vertical farming and hydroponics; transitioning farmers from traditional farming – Compass Netherlands has partnered with Local2Local, a platform that enables farmers and producers to sell their products locally |
S Short M Medium L Long-termThe results refer to this scope only and, as such, cannot be extrapolated – the analysis does not include the mitigation or adaptation measures that would be undertaken by the Group’s businesses and their suppliers to offset the estimated cost increases.
Consistent with last year, no potential financial impacts in 2030 of 2.5% or more of total spend on in-scope food categories before business levers were identified in respect of the physical climate risks modelled. This year’s modelling of physical risks shows that the most significant potential impact is from chronic water stress in the US and Australia in 2050 under all three climate scenarios, with an estimated annual cost increase in the range of 2.5% to 5.0% of the total spend on in-scope food categories across the US, UK, Australia and France. The analysis shows that beef and dairy production is likely to be most impacted by climate change, with costs increasing in the long-term. However, our existing strategy, informed by a focus on potential climate impacts, is building competitive sourcing programmes in alternative food categories including meatless proteins and dairy alternatives, such that the impact of this risk can be successfully mitigated by the Group. The most significant potential impact identified during our quantitative scenario analysis last year was from the transition risk of carbon taxes on animal protein in the US in 2030 under low-carbon climate Scenario A, with an estimated annual cost increase in a range of 5.0% to 7.5%. Whilst we concluded that the application of the business levers at hand in our operational model would substantially reduce the financial impact, the analysis showed that carbon tax on our Scope 3 GHG emissions is a key risk to mitigate and, therefore, it is the focus of our current efforts, which are highlighted in the Metrics and targets section below.
We will continue to evolve our scenario analysis for future TCFD disclosures. In 2024, we expect to quantify an opportunity while continuing to expand our analysis into more geographies and product categories.
Compass Group’s sustainability leadership, climate net zero roadmap and well-established plant-forward strategy make us more resilient and adaptable than many of our peers to the impacts of climate change, most notably evolving client and consumer demands and the projected climate impacts on animal protein production costs and availability. The Group benefits from a wide range of strategic and operational processes already in place that can be flexed to address changing market dynamics, supply disruption and other impacts of climate change. These processes include a combination of operational mitigation measures and strategic business model levers, captured in the table on page 49 and 50. The main levers available to Compass are flexible menu arrangements with clients, food waste management to optimise resource efficiency, and continued strategic diversification of suppliers and sourcing regions. Compass already widely deploys these levers as part of our normal business practices, and we are confident they will continue to provide a competitive advantage during any climate transition. Beyond these business levers, we are also evolving our approach to carbon. Most of Compass Group’s GHG emissions are Scope 3. Collaboration with our suppliers is essential as we recognise that we cannot impact those emissions on our own. We are working with partners like Planet FWD (see page 38), and we are moving to a volume-based data approach, to build a more granular understanding of food-related emissions. Working with our suppliers on reducing their carbon emissions, combined with menu engineering and reducing food waste, form the three key levers to our carbon reduction strategy. We believe our business model will be resilient in all three climate change scenarios that were considered during the process.
Climate change has been assessed as a principal risk by the Board since 2021, recognising the potential impacts it can have on our businesses in the medium and long-term. Climate change risks and opportunities are considered as part of our MRA process: a structured biannual bottom-up and top-down risk review completed by all countries, which is the cornerstone of our risk management framework. The process for identifying climate-related risks and opportunities is consistent with last year and continues to involve both country leadership teams and central functions, including Finance, Risk Management, Legal and Sustainability. Risks are identified and assessed within each country and region, and the Group risks are assessed biannually by the Board. In accordance with our risk management framework, we assess the materiality of key risks and opportunities, including climate-related risks and opportunities, and deem them to have a substantive financial or strategic impact if there is a one-off or recurring annual profit impact of more than 4% of our PBIT. More information about our risk management framework can be found on pages 24 and 25.
As noted on pages 26 to 30, the Group’s principal risks (which include climate-related risks) are all considered as part of the Group’s strategic planning process and viability statement assessment. In addition, we note on page 151 how climate risk has been considered in the basis of preparation of the Group’s consolidated financial statements. Climate risks and mitigations are monitored throughout the year by the Executive Committee, as part of the biannual MRA process, and separately by a cross-functional steering group. RMDs are responsible for managing climate change risks and opportunities for their respective regions while responsibility at the country level sits with the country Managing Directors. The development of action plans to manage the climate-related risks and maximise the opportunities, and the continual monitoring of progress against agreed KPIs, are integral parts of both business process and core activities throughout the Group. These KPIs consist mainly of the metrics described in the Metrics and targets section below, and are in line with our strategy and the conclusions of our scenario analysis.
In line with our commitment to the Paris Agreement and our sustainability strategy, which includes climate action, we have established climate-related metrics and targets for the short, medium and long-term, at both a Group and operating country level. We have committed to:
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures continued
Strategic report
We have also committed to achieving carbon neutrality worldwide in our Group operations by 2030 (Scopes 1 and 2). To achieve this, we will compensate and later neutralise remaining Scope 1 and 2 direct GHG emissions through high-quality carbon removal projects. As a critical step towards lower GHG emissions, we have also committed to reducing food waste by 50% by 2030. To support the business to meet these targets the Group launched a Sustainable Financing Framework in July 2022 to issue sustainable debt. Under this framework, in September 2022 we successfully issued two sustainable bonds, raising proceeds of €500 million and £250 million respectively, which will be used to progress the Group’s sustainability initiatives and the delivery of its global climate net zero target. As of September 2023, we have allocated 50% of the proceeds raised on sustainable initiatives, including operating expenditures on certified ethically traded coffee and tea and certified sustainable fish and seafood. Further details can be found in the latest Sustainable Bond Allocation Report on the Group’s website www.compass-group.com/en/investors/debt-investors/sustainable-financing
With a third of all food produced globally wasted every year, reducing food waste – both within our own operations and by working with suppliers to reduce food waste at source – is a core strategic priority for the Group and our businesses. By sending less food waste to landfill and ensuring good food is not wasted, we are helping to mitigate climate change, relieving pressure on natural resources. This strategy will also continue to enhance purchasing and product management efficiencies throughout our operations globally, supporting the mitigation of the physical and transition risks identified in our scenario analysis. We are on track to achieve a 50% reduction in food waste by 2030, which we see as our most immediate contribution to reducing GHG emissions. This year, we have more than doubled our food waste measurement capability by deploying our range of food waste management systems in nearly 8,000 sites across all regions, with data assurance provided by an independent third party. Our investment in technology helped deliver a 28% reduction in food waste in 2022.# Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The continued global rollout will see food waste technology made available in relevant sites across all Compass markets, improving tracking and accountability of kitchen waste worldwide while also delivering significant reductions in the Group’s Scope 3 GHG emissions and clients’ carbon footprints. See page 39 for further details on our progress on food waste this year.
We report our energy usage and Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions annually (see page 42). In 2023, we monitored the energy usage and GHG emissions of our owned and operated sites across 28 countries (2022: 29) which represent 98% of the Group’s underlying revenue 2 (2022: 98%). This year, we have again calculated our Scope 2 GHG emissions using market-based methodology to recognise the purchasing of low-carbon energy. Our Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions normalised by revenue are disclosed on page 42.
Of our emissions, 98% sit under Scope 3 and are related to the products we purchase. Although these emissions are not entirely within our control, we can influence changes through menu choices, reducing food waste or by working with suppliers to contribute to reductions. We have improved our methodology and we now measure emissions on a volume basis rather than by spend, which is a more accurate reflection of our Scope 3 GHG emissions. Our most recent data show an approximate 30% reduction in our Scope 3 purchased goods emissions compared to our 2019 baseline. This year, we have more than doubled our food waste measurement capability by deploying our range of food waste management systems in nearly 8,000 sites across all regions, with data assurance provided by an independent third party. Our investment in technology helped deliver a 28% reduction in foot waste in 2022 1 .
53 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
technology which will allow us to further reduce food waste, more accurately refine our menu and production planning, and enhance procurement efficiency. The target for this KPI was met in 2023, with the 2024 annual bonus KPI focusing on driving usage of the technology (see page 120).
We recognise the importance of measurement and follow-up to drive change and have considered the seven metric categories in the TCFD recommendations. In addition to the metrics mentioned above, we will continue to explore how to measure transition risks, physical risks, climate-related opportunities and capital deployment to the extent relevant.
We are encouraged by the findings of the expanded scenario analysis this year, which support and reaffirm our sustainability strategy and the mitigating actions we are already taking across our global operations. Though additional climate-related risks have been identified, we are confident in our ability to manage these risks whilst maximising the available opportunities. Consequently, we expect the net impact to be immaterial to the Group. We remain steadfast in our commitment to collaborate with partners in our ecosystem to decarbonise while continuing to work with external experts to broaden the scope of our efforts in this area and further improve our TCFD disclosures year-on-year. Building a low-carbon supply chain can only be achieved through close collaboration with our supply chain partners. In the UK&I this year, we have mandated that all suppliers establish science-based targets, while in the US we hosted roundtable discussions with our key suppliers to explore their carbon reduction strategies.
In order to monitor our progress in reaching our 2030 science-based targets, we will continue to measure and disclose our relevant Scope 3 emissions annually.
We recognise the importance of having an effective internal carbon pricing system in place, as well as the effects of a possible increase in the price of carbon offsets going forward. We therefore continue to assess how to introduce an internal carbon pricing method as a matter of priority whilst we evolve our data reporting systems to be able to capture data at a product level, which would be a critical enabler.
To further strengthen our targets and commitments, the Remuneration Committee introduced a new ESG KPI for the 2023 annual bonus plan for executive directors and senior management, to support our sustainability priorities (see pages 116 to 117). This focuses on reducing food waste across our operations, targeting an annual increase in the number of sites recording food waste using industry-leading technology. This has been effective in focusing our leadership to accelerate the deployment of food waste management
| GHG Scope 3 – Category | Comment on data |
|---|---|
| Purchased goods and services | Calculated with average data methodology using activity data for 94% of food spend in the USA, 95% in Australia, and a significant portion in the UK. All other purchased goods and services were calculated using spend data and environmentally extended input-output (EEIO) emissions factors. These emissions factors include upstream transportation for purchased goods and services, unless upstream transportation is separately purchased by Compass Group. |
| Capital goods | Spend-based method was used on capital goods to calculate the emissions using EEIO emissions factors. |
| Fuel and energy- related activities | Primary data for Scope 1 and 2 emissions was used to calculate the upstream portion of these activities (US Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) data for most countries). France was calculated using energy usage per meal and fuel usage for transportation emissions. |
| Upstream transportation and distribution | Upstream transportation emissions are included in emissions for category 3.1 (Purchased goods and services) unless purchased separately. Transportation represented in category 3.4 was calculated using spend data and EEIO emissions factors. France was extrapolated based on data from freight providers. |
| Waste generated in operations | Waste studies for each country were used to approximate food waste based on purchased food. France was calculated based on estimated waste per meal. |
| Business travel | Air travel was calculated based on total miles travelled, taking into account country-specific domestic versus international flights, to determine average emissions load. In countries with primary data available, ground travel was also calculated based on total miles travelled by mode of transportation, using each country’s government-published emissions factors. In other countries, ground travel emissions were estimated based on total spend for travel. |
| Employee commuting | Employee commuting was calculated using total number of employees commuting, commuting days in a year, assumed commute distances, assumed vehicle types, and emissions factors from each country’s government-published emissions factors. |
| Upstream leased assets | Compass Group does not lease upstream assets. Energy usage in client kitchens was previously included in this category but is now included in category 3.11 (Use of sold products). |
| Use of sold products | Compass Group’s use of sold products primarily comprises energy usage in client kitchens. Energy use calculations were estimated using factors based on electrical and natural gas usage in commercial kitchens by revenue. Differences in food costs and consumer prices across countries were normalised using food indices from FAOSTAT. Energy usage in client kitchens was previously represented in category 3.8 (Upstream leased assets). |
| End-of-life treatment of sold products | Estimates were made for both end-of-life food waste and packaging waste. Food waste rates are country-specific. All packaging is assumed to end up as waste, and the quantity of packaging is estimated according to average packaging mass:product ratios based on submitted food weights. These emissions were previously treated as category 3.5 (Waste generated in operations). |
| Investments | Calculations were based on revenue data and EEIO emissions factors for relevant sectors. For partially-owned investments, revenue is allocated to Compass by percentage of ownership or period of ownership, and only this portion is used for emissions estimates. This category was previously not relevant. |
54 Strategic report
The table below sets out where stakeholders can find information in our Strategic report that relates to non-financial matters detailed under section 414CB of the Companies Act 2006.
| Reporting requirement | Some of our relevant policies | Where to read more in this Report about our impact, including the principal risks relating to these matters |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental matters – Sustainability Strategy – Environmental Policy Statement | Purpose | 38-44 |
| GHG Emissions | 42 | |
| TCFD reporting | 45-54 | |
| Principal Risks – Climate change and sustainability | 26 | |
| Employees – Code of Business Conduct – Business Integrity Policy – Workplace Health and Safety Policy Statement – DE&I Policy | Chief Executive’s review – People | 10 |
| People | 32-37 | |
| Principal Risks – Health and Safety, People | 26-27 | |
| Safety culture | 12 | |
| Ethics and integrity | 13-14 | |
| Human rights – Code of Business Conduct – Business Integrity Policy – Modern Slavery Act Statement – Human Rights Policy Statement | Whistleblowing, anti-bribery and fraud | 84 |
| Human Rights | 35 | |
| Employee diversity | 33-35 | |
| Social matters – Social Purpose Chief Executive’s review – Purpose | 11 | |
| Stakeholder engagement | 74-79 and 103-104 | |
| Purpose Report | 38-44 | |
| Anti-bribery and corruption |
The Strategic report, as set out on pages 1 to 55, has been approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by Alison Yapp Group General Counsel and Company Secretary
20 November 2023
55Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Dear Shareholder
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present Compass Group PLC’s annual Corporate Governance and Directors’ Report for the financial year ended 30 September 2023. Throughout this and other parts of the Annual Report, we have sought to provide shareholders and other stakeholders with an insight into how our governance framework has supported our performance during the year.
This year, as part of the ongoing succession planning process, the Nomination Committee undertook a comprehensive review of the composition of the Board, together with the succession plans for the Board and the Executive Committee and key roles in the Group’s North America business. The review considered the tenure of the Board’s non-executive directors and the skills and experience that will be needed in the future as directors retire, having served their term in office, and as the food services industry continues to evolve.
In May, the Nomination Committee recommended the appointment of Leanne Wood as a non-executive director to the Board. Leanne will stand for election at the forthcoming AGM in February 2024. More details of the appointment process and Leanne’s induction are on page 94.
The Committee also considered changes to the roles and responsibilities of some non-executive directors, and recommended these to the Board. Following Gary Green’s decision to retire and step down from the Board, as announced in September 2023, the Committee considered the appointment of his successor and also the appointment of a new Group Chief Financial Officer (CFO). I am pleased to report that our detailed succession planning processes ensured there was an exceptional pipeline of internal talent available, and this has enabled us to fill these two key Board positions with internal candidates.
CarolArrowsmith will retire from the Board at the conclusion of the 2024 AGM having served more than nine years on the Board. More details of all of these changes can be found in the Nomination Committee report on pages 94 and 95.
In the coming year, the Committee will continue to focus on succession planning for the Board and Executive Committee, ensuring there is a strong and diverse pipeline of future senior leaders.
Across the Group, we continue to ensure the workforce is representative of the communities that Compass serves, and wearemaking promising headway. Information on the initiatives beingimplemented to drive positive change can be found in People on pages 32 to 37 and also on our website, www.compass-group.com.
Ian Meakins
Chair of the Board
At Board level, changes made in recent years reflect our aim for better gender balance and diversity in its broadest sense, and we will continue to advance this agenda. As set out on page 65, we have made good progress. At the date of this Report, 38% of directors are women versus 33% last year. In July, Anne-Françoise Nesmes succeeded John Bryant as Senior Independent Director, and three members of the Board are from a minority ethnic background. In the coming year, we hope to meet the target of having at least 40% of Board membership represented by women.
This year was KPMG’s 10th year as the Company’s external auditor and, during the year, the Audit Committee conducted a competitive tender process for the role of external statutory auditor. Following the conclusion of the tender process, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the incumbent, KPMG LLP, be reappointed as the Company’s external auditor. More detail about the audit tender process can be found in the Audit Committee report on pages 87 and 88.
Throughout the year, the Board was kept up to date on the progress and effectiveness of the Group’s ESG strategies. With regard to environmental matters, the Board and the Corporate Responsibility Committee have reviewed the Group’s progress toward its climate net zero commitment, and closely monitored the developing sustainability disclosure landscape and reporting frameworks.
On social matters, we reviewed plans to create lifetime career opportunities and to further improve the experience of employees in the Group, including initiatives designed to give back to and create value for the communities in which Compass operates. As part of the Group’s continuing drive to improve its safety culture, the Corporate Responsibility Committee approved a move from the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) workplace health and safety performance measure, to the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) performance measure for 2024, reflecting the continuing maturity ofCompass’ safety culture. More detail on these matters can be found on in the Strategic report on pages 1 to 55 and on our website, www.compass-group.com.
The Board and its committees continue to monitor developments in governance, particularly the proposed changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 and the proposed audit reforms.
The Board approved a change in the Group’s presentation currency from sterling to US dollars to take effect from 1 October 2023. More information can be found on pages 81 and 84.
56 Governance
The Board values engagement with stakeholders. As set out on page74, for practical reasons, most stakeholder engagement takes place between the Company’s subsidiaries and their stakeholders at an operational level. Direct engagement between members of the Board and stakeholders is principally with employees and investors. However, the Board ensures that there are effective mechanisms in place to support the continuous flow of information between the Board,senior management and the wider organisation to enable the Board to understand the views of all our stakeholders. Details of how the Board has oversight of stakeholders’ interests, together with examples of how decisions taken by the Board have impacted stakeholders during the year, can be found on pages74 to 79 and 81.
This year, we conducted an internal evaluation of the Board and its committees. The results of the evaluation concluded that the Board and its committees continue to operate effectively, and I am confident that we have an appropriate balance of capability, skills, experience and diversity on the Board to continue to do so. However, we are not complacent, and we have identified a number of priorities for the Board and its committees for the year ahead to help us continue to build on the progress we have made to date, and to contribute to the ongoing success of the Group.
Ian Meakins
Chair of the Board
20 November 2023
It is the Board’s view that for the financial year ended 30September 2023, the Company was compliant with the principles and provisions set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the Code) with the following exception. During the first three months of the financial year, the Company did not comply with provision 38 (alignment of executive director pension contribution rates with those available to the workforce). The Company has been compliant with provision 38 since 31December 2022, when existing pension benefits for executive directors were aligned to the maximum rate available to the majority of the wider UK workforce. For more information, please refer to page 115 of the Directors’ Remuneration report.
The Company’s auditor, KPMG LLP, is required to review whether the above statement reflects the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the Code specified for its review by the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Listing Rules and to report if it does not reflect such compliance. No such report has been made.
The Board is committed to the high standards of corporate governance set out in the Code. The Code can be found on the FRC’s website, www.frc.org.uk. This Corporate Governance report, together with the Directors’ Remuneration report set out on pages 97 to 126, describes how the Board has applied the principles and complied with the provisions set out in the Code for the year under review. The Directors’ Report also contains information required to be disclosed under the FCA’s Listing Rules and Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules. To the extent necessary, certain information is incorporated into this Report by reference. This Corporate Governance report on pages 56 to 126 and the Other Statutory Disclosures on pages 127 to 130, together with the Directors’ responsibilities statement on page 131 and the Strategic report on pages 1 to 55, which make up the Directors’ report have been incorporated by reference.
Compass is led by an effective and balanced Board dedicated to promoting the long-term sustainable success of the Company, generating value for shareholders, and contributing to wider society.# Governance
The Board has established the Company’s purpose, values and strategy, which are aligned with its culture. Read more on pages 56 to 81.
The roles of the Chair of the Board and the Group Chief Executive Officer (CEO) are separate, and there is an appropriate combination of executive and independent non-executive directors. The responsibilities of the Chair, Group CEO and Senior Independent Director (SID) are set out in writing. Read more on pages 66 to 68.
Appointments are subject to a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure. Succession plans, designed to promote diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, and cognitive and personal strengths, are in place for the Board and senior management. The Board and its committees are evaluated annually, in accordance with the Code. Read more on pages 93 to 96.
Formal, transparent policies and procedures are in place to ensure the independence and effectiveness of the internal and external audit functions, the integrity of financial and narrative statements, and to manage and mitigate risks. Read more on pages 82 to 88.
Compass has remuneration policies designed to support its strategy and promote long-term sustainable success. Executive remuneration is aligned to the Company’s purpose and values and is clearly linked to the delivery of long-term strategy. Read more on pages 97 to 126.
57 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Ian Meakins (67)
Chair of the Board
Dominic Blakemore (54)
Group Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Palmer Brown (52)
Group Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Gary Green (66)
Group Chief Operating Officer (COO), North America
John Bryant (58)
Non-Executive Director
Stefan Bomhard (56)
Non-Executive Director
Carol Arrowsmith (69)
Non-Executive Director
Anne-Françoise Nesmes (52)
Senior Independent Director (SID)
58 Governance
Committee membership key:
* Audit Committee
* Corporate Responsibility Committee
* Nomination Committee
* Remuneration Committee
* Chair
* Senior Independent Director
* Secretary
* Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement
Sundar Raman (48)
Non-Executive Director
Nelson Silva (68)
Non-Executive Director
Ireena Vittal (55)
Non-Executive Director and Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement (DNED)
59 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023# Governance
| | Ian Meakins | Dominic Blakemore | Palmer Brown | Gary Green | Carol Arrowsmith | Stefan Bomhard | John Bryant | Arlene Isaacs-Lowe | Anne-Françoise Nesmes | Sundar Raman | Nelson Silva | Ireena Vittal | Leanne Wood |
| :---# He is a respected innovator with significant experience in people management and business operations.
Robin has held a variety of roles at Compass. Previously, Robin was Managing Director of Chartwells, UK and Group Chief People Officer. Prior to joining Compass, Robin’s career included senior HR roles at Scottish and Newcastle Breweries, Diageo plc and Woolworth’s (part of Kingfisher PLC).
Appointed to the Executive Committee as Regional Managing Director Europe and the Middle East in February 2022, having joined the Group in 2012.
Kathinka has extensive commercial and operational experience and significant experience in change management. Kathinka holds a BI Executive in Board Management from Oslo Norwegian Business School, and a Bachelor’s degree in International Business from Oslo University.
Kathinka joined Compass in 2012 as Operations Director for the Group’s Norwegian business. In 2016, Kathinka was appointed MD of Norway and during her time in this role, she led the integration of one of the Group’s largest acquisitions. Prior to joining Compass, Kathinka’s career included a number of senior roles, including Operations Manager at a Nordic facilities management company.
Joined the Board in January 2007. Appointed Group COO, North America, in April 2012.
Gary brings strong business and operational leadership, business development, and wide-ranging sales experience. Gary is a chartered accountant and has an honorary doctorate from Johnson & Wales University in the US.
Gary joined the Group in 1986 in a senior finance role in the UK and became a UK director in 1992. He relocated to the US in 1994 as CFO of the Group’s North America business and, in 1999, became its CEO.
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Joined the Group and Executive Committee, and appointed Regional Managing Director Latin America in November 2017.
James is highly experienced in business development and leadership and holds a Bachelor’s degree in economics from Notre Dame University, an MBA from Harvard, and has completed INSEAD’s advanced management programme.
James has spent over 30 years in Latin America as an entrepreneur, executive and non-executive board member in several service-based organisations in the region, including Founder and President of Contax SA, COO at Oi SA and Board and Audit Committee member at Gol Linhas Aereas.
Appointed to the Executive Committee and as Regional Managing Director Asia Pacific in October 2022, having joined the Group in 2002.
Gaétan has 20 years’ international experience working at Compass where he has held a number of Managing Director roles in Africa, Central Asia, Ireland and more recently France. During his time with the Group, Gaétan has acquired strong business development and operational leadership acumen and brings significant experience in market innovation and change management. Gaétan holds an MSc in Management from Emlyon Business School.
Gaétan started his career in audit with accounting firm Mazars before moving to management consulting at Deloitte where he specialised in large-scale outsourcing projects.
Petros will succeed Palmer Brown as Group CFO on 1 December 2023 and will become a member of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee on the same date. Petros joined the Group in January 2020 and is the current Regional Finance Director, Europe and the Middle East.
Petros has extensive financial, operational and portfolio transformation experience in large multinational businesses. He holds a BSc in Physics from Ioannina University and a PhD in Chemistry from Reading University.
Petros has been Regional Finance Director for Europe and the Middle East for just under four years where he has played a key role in the turnaround of the region, focusing on growth strategies, the operating model and core processes as well as the use of data analytics to drive better commercial outcomes. Prior to joining Compass, Petros worked in fast-moving consumer goods businesses including Procter & Gamble, Reckitt Benckiser and Coty in Europe and North America in senior finance, operational and strategic roles.
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
| Number of Board members | Percentage of the Board | Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, CFO, Chair and SID) | Number in executive management | Percentage of executive management | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | 8 | 62% | 3 | 6 | 60% |
| Women | 5 | 38% | 1 | 4 | 40% |
| Number of Board members | Percentage of the Board | Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, CFO, Chair and SID) | Number in executive management | Percentage of executive management | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White British or other white (including minority-white groups) | 10 | 77% | 4 | 9 | 90% |
| Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups | – | – | – | 1 | 10% |
| Asian/Asian British | 2 | 15% | – | – | – |
| Black/African/Caribbean/Black British | 1 | 8% | – | – | – |
(Diagrams showing gender and ethnicity breakdown of Board and Executive Committee)
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
A number of executive management committees have also been established: Executive, General Business, Treasury Management and Disclosure. These consider various matters for recommendation to the Board and its principal committees, or deal with day-to-day matters within the authority delegated by the Board.
The Executive Committee, led by the Group CEO, is responsible for day-to-day operational management and implementation of strategy. The General Business Committee deals with general administrative matters on behalf of the Company within clearly defined limits delegated by the Board. The Treasury Management Committee oversees the implementation of the treasury policies approved by the Board, while the Disclosure Committee oversees the disclosure of market-sensitive information and other public announcements (as necessary).
The Board comprises the Chair, executive directors and independent non-executive directors, and their biographies can be found on pages 58 to 61. It is responsible for establishing the Group’s purpose, values, strategies and objectives to generate and preserve value over the long term for shareholders and to contribute to wider society. It is assisted by four principal committees (Audit, Corporate Responsibility, Nomination and Remuneration), each of which is responsible for the matters delegated by the Board and set out in its own terms of reference.
Responsible for the oversight of the Group’s financial reporting and the effectiveness of the Internal and External audit functions. See pages 82 to 88.
Ensures the Board and the Executive Committee have the necessary balance of skills, experience and diversity to oversee and deliver the Group’s strategy. See pages 93 to 96.
Responsible for the oversight of the Group’s corporate responsibility, people, health, safety and sustainability, ethics and integrity and stakeholder engagement strategies. See pages 89 to 92.
Determines the reward strategy for executive directors and senior management in the context of the wider workforce and ensures reward is aligned with shareholders’ interests. See pages 97 to 126.
Governance
The Board leads the Group’s governance structure. It provides stewardship of the Company to safeguard its long-term sustainable success, creating value for shareholders and enabling the Company and its subsidiaries to contribute to the communities and wider societies in which they operate. The Board is responsible for setting the tone from the top by demonstrating leadership.# Purpose, values and culture
The Group’s corporate culture is integral to its success. It defines Compass, what the Company stands for, and how it does business. Compass’ reputation has been built on a solid foundation of ethical values, underpinned by a well-defined and effective system of governance. This culture has assisted in the creation and protection of the long-term value of the Company and supports its strategy to deliver sustainable growth.
The Board defines the purpose of the Company and the values that guide it. A common set of expected behaviours based on Compass’ corporate values, and an effective system of governance, are described in the Code of Business Conduct (CBC). These have shaped and embedded a strong ethical and governance culture across the Group.
The Group CEO and other members of the executive management team actively promote ethical standards to ensure they are maintained, and good governance is put into practice. Key functions such as Legal, Finance, People, Ethics and Integrity and Internal Audit also promote and embed high standards of ethical behaviour and corporate governance across the Group.
The Board, supported by its committees, monitors the alignment of the Group’s culture with its purpose, values and strategy through a variety of mechanisms, cultural indicators and reporting lines, including those summarised below.
The Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement (DNED) provides a communication channel between the Group’s workforce and the Board to ensure that the employee voice is represented in the boardroom.
As part of a structured programme of engagement, the DNED, Ireena Vittal, held six roundtable meetings in the year with a diverse set of employees representing different sectors, countries and cultures. In addition, non-executive director, Arlene Isaacs-Lowe held two further employee roundtable meetings. The outcomes of the discussions were reported back to the Corporate Responsibility Committee. Read more about these workforce engagement sessions on pages 75 and 91.
The Board is responsible for oversight of risk and for setting risk appetite. It ensures that the necessary resources are in place for the Company to meet its objectives to measure its performance. A robust governance and risk management framework is in place to ensure that each business is being operated and managed appropriately, and that prudent and effective controls are in place to identify emerging and principal risks and to manage and mitigate those risks. Read more about risk management on pages 24 to 30.
The Board’s approval, effective oversight and monitoring of the implementation of strategy are vital to the long-term sustainable success of the Group. The Board considers and approves the Group’s strategic aims over the short, medium and long-term. The implementation of strategy is monitored and evaluated on an ongoing basis.
Food service remains at the core of Compass’ strategy. The market for food service continues to provide significant structural growth opportunities. To ensure Compass remains well placed to capture future market opportunities, the business continues to create innovative, bespoke offerings tailored to the needs of clients and consumers. More details of Compass’ business model and strategy can be found on pages 1 to 55.
The Board ensures that the Company continues to operate in the best interests of its shareholders as a whole. In exercising its duty to promote the success of the Company, the Board also has regard to other stakeholders, the environment, the reputation of the Company and the need to act fairly between its members. How the Company engages with its stakeholders and how the Board has oversight of stakeholder engagement is described on pages 74 to 79. The Company’s Section 172 Statement can be found on page 80.
The Board delegates the delivery of strategy and day-to-day operational management of the Group to the Executive Committee, which is led by the Group CEO.
67Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The Board comprises executive and non-executive directors, which ensures that no individual or small group of individuals dominates the Board’s decision-making. All non-executive directors, except the Chair of the Board, are considered independent. The Chair was considered to be independent on appointment.
The roles and responsibilities of Board members are detailed below and demonstrate a clear division between the roles and responsibilities of the Board and executive management. The role descriptions of the Chair of the Board, Group CEO and SID are reviewed annually by the Board and are updated as necessary to reflect changes in legislation or best practice. These documents were last reviewed in September 2023. It was concluded that the documents in their current form continue to be fit for purpose and no changes were made. Copies of the documents can be found on our website, www.compass-group.com
| Role Description | |
|---|---|
| Non-Executive Chair | Leading the Board and ensuring its overall effectiveness in discharging its duties. – shaping the culture in the boardroom and promoting openness, challenge and debate – setting the agenda for Board meetings, focusing on strategy, performance, value creation, risk management, culture, stakeholders and accountability – chairing meetings and ensuring there is timely information flow before meetings and adequate time for discussion and debate – fostering relationships based on trust, mutual respect and open communication inside and outside the boardroom – leading relations with major shareholders to understand their views on governance and performance against strategy |
| Independent Non-Executive Directors | Independent non-executive directors meeting the independence criteria as set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code comprise more than half of Board membership. – providing constructive challenge, giving strategic guidance, offering specialist advice and holding executive management to account – ensuring that no individual or small group of individuals can dominate the Board’s decision-making |
| Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement | Providing an effective engagement mechanism for the Board to understand the views of the workforce. – bringing the views and experiences of the workforce into the boardroom – enabling the Board to consider the views of the workforce in its discussions and decision-making |
| Senior Independent Director | Providing a sounding board for the Chair of the Board and serving as an intermediary for other directors and shareholders. – providing the Chair of the Board with support in the delivery of objectives, where necessary – working closely with the Nomination Committee, leading the process for the evaluation of the Chair of the Board and ensuring orderly succession to the Chair role – acting as an alternative contact for shareholders, providing a means of raising concerns other than with the Chair of the Board or senior management |
| Group CEO and Executive Directors | Leading the implementation of the Group’s strategy set by the Board. – Group CEO: leading the Executive Committee and ensuring its effectiveness in managing the overall operations and resources of the Group; also leading the implementation of the Group’s strategy – executive directors: providing information and presentations to the Board and participating in Board discussions regarding Group management, financial performance and operational matters |
| Group General Counsel and Company Secretary | Supporting the Chair of the Board and ensuring directors have access to the information they need to carry out their roles. – providing a channel for Board and committee communications and a link between the Board and management – advising the Board on legal and corporate governance matters and supporting the Board in applying the Code and complying with UK listing obligations, and other statutory and regulatory requirements |
68
Board meetings are held through a combination of physical and virtual attendance. Each year, the Board aims to hold one or two meetings overseas. This year, the Board visited the Group’s business in the US. Overseas visits provide an opportunity to assess local management performance and potential, gain further insight into how the business works on a day-to-day basis and to speak face-to-face with local management to better understand the challenges they face and listen to their views. By visiting operations, directors meet with a diverse group of colleagues including regional, country and senior management and high-potential employees on a more informal basis, which supports the succession planning process.# Board and Committee Activities
The format of visits often comprises an overview of the country’s macroeconomic environment and social trends, the challenges and opportunities facing the business combined with a review of the competitive landscape, and a detailed review of the relevant sectors in which the business operates, including its people and its three-year plan. In addition to health and safety, and routine financial and operating reports and updates, the Board spends time reviewing Group strategy and performance against the strategic plan. Meetings between the Chair of the Board and non-executive directors, both with and without the presence of the Group CEO, are scheduled in the Board’s annual programme. During the year, the non-executive directors held regular meetings without the presence of the executives, typically following each Board meeting. These meetings provide the non-executive directors with a forum in which to share experiences and discuss wider business topics. In addition, the non-executive directors attended a dinner without the executive directors present.
| Board | Audit Committee | Corporate Responsibility Committee | Nomination Committee | Remuneration Committee | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eligible to attend 1 | Meetings attended | Eligible to attend 1 | Meetings attended | Eligible to attend 1 | |
| Carol Arrowsmith | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Dominic Blakemore | 6 | 6 | – | – | 3 |
| Stefan Bomhard | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Palmer Brown | 6 | 6 | – | – | 3 |
| John Bryant | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Gary Green | 6 | 6 | – | – | – |
| Arlene Isaacs-Lowe | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Ian Meakins | 6 | 6 | – | – | 3 |
| Anne-Françoise Nesmes | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Sundar Raman | 2 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| Nelson Silva | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Ireena Vittal | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Leanne Wood | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
69Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The Board has a formal schedule of matters reserved for its decision as follows:
| November | February | March | May | July | September | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose, strategy and implementation | Group CEO’s review including a business update covering financial performance, health and safety performance, ESG, people and cultural indicators, initiatives and performance | Group CFO’s report including performance results and outlook, finance, treasury and tax initiatives | M&A and disposals, contract approvals and other capital expenditure | Strategy review including Group, regional and sector/forum updates and post-investment review, budget and three-year plan | Stakeholder engagement and shareholder analysis | Approval of change in presentation currency from sterling to US dollars (effective 1 October 2023) |
| Risks | Formal biannual material risk assessment | |||||
| Governance | Review of full-year results including going concern, viability statement, and final dividend | Review of half-year results and interim dividend | Trading update | Approval of outcome of audit tender process | ||
| Approval of corporate governance documentation | ||||||
| Approval of Board appointments/changes to directors‘ roles/responsibilities | ||||||
| Review of Committee minutes | ||||||
| Review of post-AGM Remuneration Report resolution statement | ||||||
| Effectiveness | Annual Board evaluation process and outturn | Annual review and approval, and ad-hoc review and approval of directors’ conflicts of interest |
The matters reserved for the Board are reviewed annually to ensure that they continue to be fit for purpose. They were last reviewed in September 2023 when they were updated to align to the amended treasury policies and to update the financial approval requirements following the change in presentation currency which is effective from 1 October 2023. Full details can be found on our website, www.compass-group.com. The Board had a full agenda during the year as set out in the table below:
70
At every meeting, the Board is briefed on aspects of the Group’s strategic pillars: People, Performance and Purpose.
People are Compass’ greatest asset. During the year, the Board and the Nomination Committee continued their focus on developing the Board’s blend of skills and experience. The Board also continued its employee engagement efforts through a variety of means including roundtable meetings and site visits.
In March, the Board visited the Group’s US business. During the visit, the Board attended the annual Envision Summit at the University of Miami. The Envision Group provides expertise and functional support to all operating sectors in the US, with a focus on growth, innovation and performance underpinned by sustainability. At the summit, the Board and other delegates listened to presentations from business leaders, and toured stands showcasing frictionless technologies and brands which are being deployed by Compass to deliver quality food and hospitality experiences and a positive impact for the food system. Afterwards, the Board met with the senior North America leadership team and other delegates on an informal basis and listened to their perspectives.
In May, Leanne Wood joined the Board, building on the work already undertaken to broaden the diversity and capabilities of the Board. Leanne is the current Chief Human Resources Officer of Vodafone Group Plc and has extensive HR, strategic and operational experience. The Board fully supports management’s ambition to create a diverse workforce and to increase female representation at senior levels in the organisation.
The role of the DNED is to provide an effective communication channel between the Group’s workforce and the Board to ensure that the employee voice is represented in the boardroom. Ireena Vittal has been the DNED since 2019. This year, the Board approved the Nomination Committee’s recommendation that Ireena’s tenure in this role be extended until the conclusion of her term in office as a non-executive director. Details of the employee roundtables held by Ireena during the year together with the meetings held by her Board colleague, Arlene Isaacs-Lowe, can be found on page 75.
During the year, a number of the non-executive directors separately visited some of the businesses’ operations in Australia, Portugal, Switzerland and the US. During the visits, the directors met with local management and toured client sites in the Business & Industry and Education sectors. These visits gave the non-executive directors the opportunity to engage with clients to understand what is important to them and why they choose to work with Compass. Time was also spent talking to front line employees and consumers and listening to their feedback. One director took the opportunity to assist the local team with operational tasks and to join a safety moment before service commenced for the day. These visits provided the directors with a first-hand experience of the Group’s businesses, the challenges and opportunities facing them, and the views of stakeholders.
Regular reports from management, feedback from activities undertaken by Ireena Vittal and her Board colleagues and other initiatives have helped inform the Board’s discussions and decision- making during the year. More information on our People initiatives can be found on pages 32 to 37.
Throughout the year, the Board monitored the Group’s performance against the strategic framework and priorities, including M&A, global trends, and risks and opportunities. To assist it, the Board received regular reports from the Group CEO and the Group CFO, and presentations from each of the Group’s Regional Managing Directors on regional performance. It also received updates from key functional heads, e.g. Legal, Tax, Treasury, Information Systems and Technology, and People on matters that could have an impact on the Group’s financial or operational performance.
In March, the Board reviewed the strategic plans for the Group. The Group’s strategic priorities continued to be focused on organic growth across all sectors and geographies supplemented through disciplined M&A. The Board reviewed the addressable food services market analysed by region and sector together with the continued structural growth opportunities available to the Group, which were expected to deliver future revenue growth. The Board also reviewed the three strategic pillars underpinning the growth ambitions, namely People, Performance, and Purpose.
The Board receives reports from the Group CEO at every meeting on progress against the Group’s strategy. In addition, the Board receives annual business updates from the regional management teams setting out progress against their regional strategic objectives.
At each meeting, the Board receives a report from the Group CFO setting out the financial performance of the regions and the Group in the latest period and for the year to date. The Board considers the key financial performance metrics, including revenue, organic revenue growth, operating profit and margin, operating cashflow and cashflow conversion. It also regularly reviews the financial outlook of the Group. Additionally, the Group CFO’s report provides the Board with updates on tax and treasury matters, cyber-security arrangements and technology developments.# Board activities continued
In September, the Board reviewed the Group’s preliminary budget for the financial year ending 2024 and the three-year plan for 2024-2026. The Board reviewed the key financial metrics against the backdrop of an uncertain economic climate and elevated levels of inflation. The budget and the three-year plan were both approved in principle subject to final approval being given in November 2023. Twice a year, the Board reviews the material financial and non-financial risks facing the Group’s businesses, including new and emerging risks, and agrees the Group’s principal risks at the half and full-year. It also considers the identification of risks and opportunities, the development of action plans to manage risks and maximise opportunities, and the continual monitoring of progress against agreed key performance indicators. The Board agreed that due to the escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, the trend for geopolitical risk should be elevated to reflect the year-on-year increase in risk. The Group’s principal risks, and how these are managed, are set out on pages 24 to 30.
The Board has also established processes for identifying emerging risks and horizon scanning for risks that may arise over the medium to long-term. The Board has identified artificial intelligence (AI) as an emerging risk as the democratisation of generative AI has given widespread access to powerful online AI services for content creation. During the year, the Board conducted a post-investment review which sampled around 20 client contracts. The review considered the profiles of the contracts, including: annual revenues, capital expenditure and investment returns by sector and region, post-tax returns and contract ROCE, the performance of new and retained contracts versus the original business case, and proactive contract life cycle management designed to safeguard returns. The detailed post-investment review concluded that the Group’s disciplined approach was creating shareholder value. Following a recommendation from the Audit Committee, the Board approved a change in the Group’s presentation currency from sterling to US dollars with effect from 1 October 2023. This will provide investors and other stakeholders with greater transparency over the Group’s performance and will mitigate foreign exchange volatility on earnings, given that approximately three-quarters of the Group’s underlying operating profit originates in US dollars. The Board also received a presentation from chefs and culinary innovators from the Group’s Global Culinary Forum. The Forum was created to bring together key culinary talent to collaborate and exchange ideas and share best practices by tapping into the rich seam of knowledge and unique insights from those at the forefront of the Group’s businesses. The Board was keen to understand the progress being made by the Forum, which is helping to drive better commercial and sustainability outcomes. More information on our strategy and business model can be found on pages 1 to 55.
At every meeting, the Board is briefed by the Group CEO on Purpose including up-to-date performance data on the Group’s workplace health and safety and food safety metrics against the established limits set at the beginning of the year. It is also briefed on the progress being made on the Group’s sustainability agenda, including the new food waste metric which was introduced at the beginning of the year, and social initiatives. During the year, the Corporate Responsibility Committee monitored the adoption of food waste tracking technology in operations across the Group. Reducing food waste is one of the greatest environmental challenges facing our sector and therefore one where we have the greatest potential to make a significant difference. More information about our efforts to reduce food waste can be found on page 39. In February, the Chair of the Board, together with the Group CEO, Group CFO, SID and Committee Chairs attended the 2023 AGM with the other directors participating online. The AGM is an important event in the Board’s calendar where directors have the opportunity to listen to the perspective of shareholders, answer their questions and to meet with them on a more informal basis. At the 2023 AGM, shareholders asked questions about a wide range of topics including Compass’ approach to the UK real living wage, job security, diversity, equity and inclusion, animal welfare and sustainability. In addition to the AGM, the Group CEO, Group CFO, other directors and senior managers also met regularly with investors as part of the Group’s investor engagement programme, details of which can be found on page 76. The Remuneration Committee Chair also engaged extensively with investors during the year, and details of that engagement can be found on pages 97, 98, 103 and 104. In November 2022, the Board considered and approved the Company’s 2022 Modern Slavery Act (MSA) Statement which provides an update on the progress made in the last year to further develop Compass’ approach to mitigating the risks of modern slavery in the Group’s businesses and their supply chains. The 2022 MSA Statement can be found on our website, www.compass-group.com. The 2023 MSA Statement will be published on our website in December 2023. More information about the Group’s Purpose can be found on pages 38 to 44.
All directors have access to the advice of the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, who ensures that satisfactory Board procedures are followed, and good corporate governance and compliance processes and practices are adhered to. Together with the Group CEO and the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, the Chair of the Board ensures that the Board is kept properly informed and is consulted on all matters reserved for it, that Board papers are of a high standard, and that information is distributed in a timely fashion to allow directors to be suitably prepared in advance of meetings. The Board has established a procedure for directors, if deemed necessary, to seek independent professional advice at the Company’s expense in the furtherance of their duties. In accordance with the Company’s articles of association, directors have been granted an indemnity by the Company to the extent permitted by law in respect of liabilities incurred as a result of their office. The indemnity would not provide any coverage where a director is proved to have acted fraudulently or dishonestly. The Company has also arranged appropriate insurance cover in respect of potential legal action against its directors and officers.
A formal and rigorous evaluation of the Board, its committees, the Chair of the Board and individual directors is conducted every year. The Nomination Committee is responsible for overseeing the evaluation process. The Chair of the Board is responsible for acting on the evaluation’s results, recognising strengths and addressing any areas for improvement that have been identified. The details of this year’s internal evaluation process can be found on page 96. The Chair of the Board addresses the developmental needs of the Board. All directors are required to refresh and update their skills, knowledge, expertise and familiarity with the Company on an ongoing basis, ensuring that the Board continues to operate effectively. A formal, comprehensive and tailored induction is provided to all directors following their appointment, including external training, visits to key locations within the Group, and meetings with members of the Executive Committee, other senior executives and functional heads. The induction also covers a review of the Group’s governance policies and structures, including details of the risks and operating issues facing the Group. As part of ongoing training, the Board and its committees receive regular updates from expert advisers such as the Group’s auditors, external legal counsel, remuneration advisers and internal subject matter experts, and have access to external training courses where appropriate. The Chair of the Board, supported by the Nomination Committee, considers the training needs of directors as part of the annual evaluation process. Where a training need is identified by the Nomination Committee or a director, the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary facilitates this. During the year, the directors participated in a training session delivered by the Group’s sustainability team, the external auditor and the Company’s external sustainability advisers, which focused on the evolving ESG landscape. The directors discussed the developing disclosure requirements under the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the International Sustainability Standard Board’s first two sustainability reporting standards, together with recent TCFD developments. The training session also highlighted developments in the broader ESG landscape and the growing expectations of stakeholders.
As part of their ongoing development, executive directors are permitted to take on one external non-executive role on a non-competitor listed company board, subject to prior approval by the Board. Fees earned for the appointment may be retained by the director. The Board monitors the extent of directors’ other interests and the time commitment required to fulfil those interests to ensure that the effectiveness of the Board is not compromised. Each director has a duty under the Companies Act 2006 to avoid a situation in which they have, or might have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the interests of the Company. This duty is in addition to the obligation owed to the Company to disclose to the Board an interest in any transaction or arrangement being considered by the Company.# Governance
The Company’s articles of association authorise the directors to approve such situations and to apply other provisions to allow conflicts of interest to be managed. The Board follows an established procedure when deciding whether to authorise an actual or potential conflict of interest. Only independent directors (i.e. those with no interest in the matter under consideration) can make the relevant decision. In making a decision, the directors must act in good faith and in a way they consider most likely to promote the Company’s success. Further, the directors may, if appropriate, impose limits or conditions when granting authorisation. The Board considered and authorised each director’s reported actual and potential conflicts of interest at its meeting in July 2023. It also considered any changes on an ad-hoc basis throughout the year. Any authorised conflicts are reviewed at least every 15 months.
By understanding what is important to clients, Compass can ensure that its solutions are tailored to support their individual business objectives.
Compass maintains open and transparent relationships based on honesty and respect. Engagement with clients occurs in many ways, including:
– updating clients through quarterly business reviews
– creating targeted strategies to meet their sustainability goals
– hosting sustainability advisory councils
– gathering insights from print and social media
– collecting feedback from surveys
– hosting online events, podcasts and teaching kitchens
– utilising NPS (net promoter scores) in some markets
– talent recruitment and retention
– on-trend technology solutions
– diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I)
– clean and safe environments
– sustainability commitments including: climate net zero, plant-forward menus, reduction of food waste and single-use plastics, and supporting local communities
– providing cost-effective, quality food solutions for our clients
– Sustainability Advisory Council with key Business & Industry clients in the Group’s largest business in the US
– annual Stop Food Waste Day global activities, including a live event with 50+ clients in Portland, Oregon
– Chef Appreciation Week
– working as part of a global collaborative network for leading innovators in the food space
– developing custom solutions through consultation with clients
– webinars, roundtables, and factsheets on topical issues, including inflation and sustainability
– individual visits by non-executive directors to some of the Group’s businesses where the directors directly engaged with clients
– UK Social Mobility client event in London
– Agro Food Park in Denmark
– Innovation Council with industry experts in the US and UK
– Global Eating at Work survey
– consumer research conducted for engagement with clients
The Board is kept informed of business performance by the Regional Managing Directors (RMDs), who provide an overview of operations at a regional, country and sector level. The RMDs are supported by their senior leadership and marketing teams, who provide further analysis of the client base. From these reports and those of the Group CEO and Group CCO, the Board forms a view of the interests of the clients of the businesses, ongoing client engagement activities, and what is important to clients.
Compass is a geographically and culturally diverse business with operations in around 35 countries. As a result, it has a global and diverse community of stakeholders, each with their own interests in, and expectations of the Company. As set out in the Strategic report, we have a decentralised structure enabling the development of strategies on a country-by-country and sector-by-sector basis for which country management are responsible and accountable. The Board’s role is therefore to provide a framework that gives the Group’s businesses the freedom and flexibility to make decisions, pursue opportunities, and manage risks. Responsibility for the day-to-day operational management and implementation of Group strategy has been delegated to the Group Executive Committee, led by the Group CEO. To enable the effective day-to-day running of the Group’s businesses, the country Managing Directors and local leadership teams are responsible for local strategy, execution, and compliance, in alignment with Group values, governance and standards. Depending on the region, an additional layer of regional and functional leadership is present. As a result, stakeholder engagement primarily takes place at a local operational level, and the Board relies on local management to keep it informed of the impact of the Group’s operations on its stakeholders. During the year, the Board and the Corporate Responsibility Committee considered information from across the Group’s businesses and received presentations from management. This enabled the Board to consider the likely consequences of decisions over the long term and, where relevant, the impact on stakeholders and the environment. Examples of decisions made during the year, and the stakeholders impacted, are given on page 81. A summary of how Compass engages with its stakeholders and how the Board is involved and kept informed of stakeholder engagement follows.
People are at the heart of the Group’s strategy for growth. Compass wants employees to thrive in a fair and inclusive work environment. Understanding their needs and motivations helps to drive business performance and to provide a great place to work.
Employee engagement is primarily conducted through the Group’s supportive management structure. A policy of honesty and openness facilitates feedback for discussion. Engagement takes many forms including: surveys, roundtables, sector and functional forums, townhalls, Speak Up, We’re Listening reports, internal social media channels, and consultative bodies.
– DE&I and wellbeing
– digital and technology
– proposed consolidation of the UK pension trust arrangements
– talent and progression
– executive remuneration
– engagement surveys in 19 countries, including a full engagement survey in the US, with over 140,000 responses received
– virtual townhalls
– roundtables with the DNED, Ireena Vittal, supplemented by roundtables held by non-executive director, Arlene Isaacs-Lowe
– Board and non-executive director visits to some of the Group’s businesses where they engaged directly with front line employees
– DE&I Be the Difference conference in the US
– further leveraging the use of mobile apps to better connect with front line colleagues
– employee forums and virtual panel discussions, such as the People Happiness Forum held by Compass Middle East
– carbon literacy training for UK Foodbuy colleagues
– consultation with UK employees who are members of Compass’ UK pension schemes and the UK Works Council (which includes representatives nominated by recognised trade unions) on the proposed merger of the UK defined benefit and defined contribution schemes
The Group CEO, Group CFO, Group CPO and other senior executives hold townhalls and make presentations to update employees on the Group’s strategy and performance, and on key initiatives such as the Group’s climate net zero commitment. The townhalls include Q&A sessions for employees to ask questions about the Group’s performance and the challenges and opportunities facing the business. A proportion of the time is also allocated during the sessions to celebrate the achievements of front line and other colleagues, who are able to share their experiences of working at Compass.
During the year, Ireena Vittal, the DNED, engaged directly with employees across the Group to understand their views and experiences of working at Compass, hearing what could be improved and taking feedback on our approach to remuneration. Six roundtable meetings were held with employees from a variety of sectors, businesses and geographies across the Group as part of a structured programme of engagement designed and supported by the Group CPO. These roundtables provided the DNED with opportunities to hear directly from employees in an open environment, which in turn enabled the Board to better understand the differing views of our people. Participants valued the opportunity to share experiences and learn from each other. They particularly appreciated the open, intimate structure of the sessions and the freedom to explore a variety of topics that are important to them. The feedback from these roundtables was combined with the output from the Group’s wider engagement activities and were reported to the Corporate Responsibility Committee. The main themes arising from the roundtables included:
– the challenges faced by operations and functions in recruiting and retaining talent
– the importance of development opportunities for employees
– the positive sentiment about how Compass considers the wellbeing of its employees and the importance of maintaining focus in this area
– the sharing of best practices across different markets and businesses, which has been hugely beneficial and should continue to be encouraged
– continuing to focus on the development of unit managers
Two further employee roundtables were held in the year hosted by non-executive director, Arlene Isaacs-Lowe. The first session was held virtually when Ms Isaacs-Lowe met with colleagues representing the UAE, North America, and Türkiye. The second roundtable meeting was held face-to-face when Ms Isaacs-Lowe met with Black Ambassadors from the Group’s UK&I business, in support of the UK&I’s Black Future Month, one of a series of initiatives held during the year to recognise and promote opportunities available to the diverse communities of talent across the Group.# Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
These sessions provided an opportunity for black and ethnic minority colleagues to share their personal experiences of working at Compass and their views on the actions being taken by management to give a voice to, and inspire talent from, black and ethnic minority communities. Feedback from employee roundtables, and output from the wider engagement activities, enable the Board to form a view of the interests of employees, what is important to them, and ongoing engagement activities. Some examples of how the Board has considered employees in its decision making are set out on page 81.
DNED roundtables in 2023
| Date | Countries Represented |
|---|---|
| 6 February | UK |
| 7 February | Canada, Finland |
| 8 May | Australia, India, Netherlands, Colombia, Italy, Spain, UAE, USA |
| 8 May | Australia, USA |
| 22 August | Belgium, USA |
| 23 August | USA |
75
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Compass’ philosophy is to engage in regular, open, and transparent dialogue with existing and prospective shareholders. Their views and opinions are shared with and valued by the Board, which reviews the feedback and, where considered appropriate, takes action to address any concerns.
Compass engages with existing investors through one-to-one and group meetings, webcasts, presentations, conference calls and the Company’s AGM.
Areas of focus
During the year, as part of its proactive engagement programme organised by the Group’s Investor Relations team, the Company held 341 meetings (virtually and in person), with representatives from 430 institutional investors through a mix of group and one-to-one appointments. Of these, 81 were attended by the Group CEO and/or Group CFO (2022: 71).
Stakeholder engagement continued
The Chair of the Board, the Remuneration Committee Chair and other members of the Group’s management such as the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, Group CPO, Group Reward Director and Group CCO, as appropriate, also engaged with investors on a wide range of matters including governance, people, remuneration and sustainability. The Company also held a virtual investor deep dive on sustainability, which was attended live by 86 institutional investors and sell-side analysts. The 2023 AGM was held at Twickenham Rugby Football Union stadium. Shareholders were encouraged to submit questions in advance of the meeting. All questions and answers were posted on the Company’s website.
The Chair of the Board ensures that the Board maintains an appropriate dialogue with shareholders. The Group CEO, Group CFO and Head of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications meet regularly with institutional investors to discuss strategic issues and to make presentations on the Company’s results. Committee Chairs are available to engage with major shareholders regarding their areas of responsibility. Non-executive directors develop an understanding of the views of major shareholders through regular updates from the Head of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications and from external advisers. The Group General Counsel and Company Secretary also acts as an important focal point for communications on corporate governance matters throughout the year, particularly around shareholder meetings. All shareholders are invited to attend the Company’s AGM, which provides a forum where they can put questions to the Board and meet with individual directors and senior executives after the AGM.
| Group IR meetings | 1-1 IR meetings | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | 273 | 341 |
Investor relations meetings
76
Compass serves people safe and healthy food and drink, which improves learning and helps them work more productively and recover better. As an organisation, Compass wants its consumers to thrive and creates environments to help them do that.
Compass uses a variety of methods to engage with consumers including:
Areas of focus
The Board receives updates on trends from sector leaders, including details of opportunities, challenges, and developments in consumer food services, e.g. product innovation and consumer interest in brand responsibility and sustainability. Understanding what is important to the Group’s consumers and responding to evolving consumer trends and behaviour is essential to the success of the business. Management has well-established processes and solutions for capturing market information on changes in consumer trends. These are reported to the Board by the Executive team, particularly through the Group CEO’s reports, and presentations provided by the regional management teams and country Managing Directors.
Compass engages with its suppliers: to collaborate on building resilient and sustainable supply chains through mutually beneficial, lasting partnerships; to address shared challenges in responsible and sustainable sourcing, and to communicate the Group’s supply chain standards, expectations and commitments.
The Group’s businesses regularly communicate with their suppliers. Examples of how they engage include:
Areas of focus
The Board is kept informed about supply chain initiatives through the Corporate Responsibility Committee which receives reports from the Group CCO, the Sustainability team and the Group Head of E&I, including work to identify and prevent modern slavery and human trafficking in the Group’s businesses and supply chains.
77
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Compass engages with the communities in which it operates in order to: build trust by operating responsibly and sustainably; by addressing issues that are important to the communities; and by providing training opportunities, careers and support to local people, particularly those who are not in education, training or employment. Compass aims to enrich the communities in which it operates and to minimise its impact on the environment. Our businesses operate in culturally diverse communities with differing characteristics and needs.
Compass operates many local employment programmes to recruit and develop local people to work at its sites. This includes partnering with local charities and organisations to raise awareness and donating funds to help local causes. Surplus food is also donated to various organisations that pass it on to people in their communities who need it. Through The Compass Group Foundation (the Foundation), we engaged with charities and community organisations in the US, UK, Türkiye, India, Australia, and Spain to fund inclusive job and training opportunities for under-privileged groups, as well as to empower local and SME suppliers.# Section 172 Statement
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires the directors to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of the members as a whole, having regard to the interests of stakeholders in their decision-making. In making decisions, the directors consider what is most likely to promote the success of the Company for its shareholders in the long term, as well as the interests of the Group’s other stakeholders. The directors understand the importance of taking into account the views of stakeholders and the impact of the Company’s activities on local communities, the environment, including climate change, and the Group’s reputation. The table below sets out the areas of this Report which demonstrate how the directors have had regard to their Section 172 responsibilities.
The Foundation provided grants to a number of charities around the world, with Compass employees (where possible) volunteering their skills and expertise to amplify the Foundation’s impact. In India, the Foundation and the Indian business are partnering with the Sai Swayam Society to train young people with speech and hearing disabilities in hospitality, IT, life and soft skills, which has increased their confidence, self-esteem and, importantly, enabled them to secure positions in well-respected companies. Employees from Compass in India have visited the organisation’s facilities to support with training activities and identifying job opportunities. In Spain, the Foundation and our Spanish business are working with Fundación Integra to train women who have been victims of domestic violence, and to provide them with free access to a hospitality certification via Compass Group Spain’s Women’s Academy. Volunteers from Compass in Spain have provided training and tutoring to the women as they progress with the qualification. In Türkiye, the Foundation and Compass’ Türkiye business engaged with the Down’s Syndrome Association (DSA) to train and place people with Down’s Syndrome in jobs in the food and hospitality sector and raise awareness of the contribution of people with Down’s Syndrome in the job market. Stakeholder engagement continued. In the UK, the Foundation and our UK&I business are working with FoodCycle to recruit and train project leaders to undertake the running of community kitchens to support food security and tackle isolation. Compass UK&I chefs have been donating their time to upskill FoodCycle volunteers. In addition, the Foundation is working with the KERB social enterprise to provide opportunities for very early start food business owners, particularly those from less advantaged backgrounds, to access street food equipment and to trading at a market. In the US, the Foundation and our US business are supporting the Carolina Farm Stewardship Association to provide advice and support to small farmers in food safety planning and certification, focusing on sustainable farming practices and climate resilience. In Australia, Compass Group has partnered with Foodbuy Australia as well as Bridging the Gap Foundation (founded by Menzies School of Health and Science Research), which has been granted seed funding by The Compass Group Foundation to pilot a Nutritional Hunger Program (NHP). The NHP aims to end nutritional hunger in remote Indigenous communities by co-designing a programme with local Indigenous community leaders to find solutions to get high-quality, nutritious food to Indigenous communities at reasonable prices. During the year, further engagement took place with several other charities, with more projects due to be funded by the Foundation in 2024. Beyond the Foundation, there are many instances of community engagement across the businesses, including:
* DelightFul week in the USA – 300 college campuses performing a million acts of kindness
* SoldierOn, an Australian organisation dedicated to supporting veterans and their families including a focus on creating employment opportunities and investing in mental health
* Mission to a Million – Compass Group UK&I’s commitment to provide support to one million people by 2030 through jobs, training, community engagement and development
Community engagement is primarily achieved though liaison with local organisations and representatives and via initiatives that are sensitive to cultural differences. The Board is kept informed of such activity through the Corporate Responsibility Committee, which receives regular reports from the Group CCO and the Sustainability team, and through the presentations given to the Board by the regional and country management teams.
It is important to engage with governments and regulators in order to communicate Compass’ views to those who have the responsibility for implementing policy, laws, and regulations relevant to our businesses.
Compass’ views are made known through a series of industry consultations, forums, and conferences.
The Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, Group Head of Tax, and other subject matter experts regularly update the Board and its committees on regulatory developments affecting the Group and its businesses. In addition, the Board receives updates from the regional and country Managing Directors on relevant developments in their businesses.
Compass engages with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to ensure it stays up to date and develops effective action plans to enable it to have a positive impact on key social, environmental and economic issues relevant to the Group‘s businesses.
Dialogue with NGOs is maintained through regular communications, interactions, and meetings, as well as through industry association memberships and at forums and conferences.
The Board is kept up to date on interactions with NGOs, which support Compass with their knowledge and expertise. The Corporate Responsibility Committee receives reports from the Group CCO, the Group Sustainability team, and the Group Director for Employment, Equity and Social Impact on key areas of focus, such as climate change, farm animal welfare and human rights.# Section 172
Find out more
(a) the likely consequences of any decision in the long term – Strategic report: pages 1 to 55 – Consideration of stakeholder interests: page 81
(b) the interests of the company’s employees – Chief Executive’s review: page 10 – Strategic framework and our business model: pages 4 to 6 – Stakeholder engagement: page 75 – People: pages 32 to 37 – Consideration of stakeholder interests: page 81 – Remuneration Committee report: page 98 – Ethics and integrity: pages 13 and 14
(c) the need to foster the company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and others – Strategic report: pages 1 to 55 – Stakeholder engagement: page 77 – Consideration of stakeholder interests: page 81
(d) the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment – Strategic report: pages 1 to 55 – Stakeholder engagement: page 78 – TCFD report: pages 45 to 54 – Consideration of stakeholder interests: page 81 – Purpose: pages 38 to 44
(e) the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct – Risk management: pages 24 to 30 – Consideration of stakeholder interests: page 81 – Audit Committee report: page 84 – Ethics and integrity: pages 13 and 14 – Safety culture: page 12
(f) the need to act fairly as between members of the company – Strategic report: page 8 – Stakeholder engagement: pages 74 to 79, and 103 to 105 – Consideration of stakeholder interests: page 81 – Remuneration Committee report: pages 103 to 105
The above Statement on Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 is incorporated by reference into the Strategic report on pages 1 to 55.
80 Governance
The examples below give an insight into how the Board had regard for the interests of its stakeholders in some of its decision-making processes during the year.
The Board recognises the importance of shareholder returns and, during the year, rewarded shareholders by recommending a final dividend of 22.1 pence per share for the financial year ended 2022, and approving an interim dividend of 15.0 pence per share for the financial year ended 2023. The Board also approved share buybacks of £1 billion (£250 million in H1 and £750 million in H2) in the year under review.
In its deliberations, the Board considered the Group’s strong financial performance in the financial year ended 2022 and in the first six months of the 2023 financial year, including its cash position and distributable reserves, together with its stated dividend policy and capital allocation model, as set out on pages 6 and 20. The Board also considered shareholders’ views and the impact of the dividend payments and share buybacks on the Group’s UK defined benefit pension scheme. The Board concluded that approval of the dividends and the share buybacks were in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole and that there was no material impact on the UK pension scheme in light of its current surplus.
Stakeholder impact: Shareholders
The Company announced with the half-year results in May 2023, that it would change its reporting currency from sterling to US dollars with effect from 1 October 2023. In coming to that decision, the Board carefully considered the relative merits of such a change and the impact for shareholders. The Board concluded the change in presentation currency was in the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders and would provide them with greater transparency of the Group’s performance and reduce foreign exchange volatility on earnings given that approximately three-quarters of the Group’s underlying operating profit originates in US dollars.
Stakeholder impact: Clients
People
Shareholders
Consumers
Suppliers
Communities
NGOs
Governments and regulators
During the year, the Board considered capital expenditure requests from the Group’s North America business in connection with the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software to replace in-unit accounting systems which had reached the end of life. Before arriving at its decision, the Board considered the benefits and challenges of implementing the new ERP software, noting that it would help: simplify operational processes; create business efficiencies (e.g. automate contractual billings and payments; automate vendor invoice processing and workflow management, and reduce manual journal entries); and improve data accuracy and the overall control environment.
The Board noted that the ERP software had been piloted at two large and complex Education sites with the purpose of testing and validating the operation of ERP software in live units, validating the assumed risks of significant process changes, and to inform the requirements for scaled deployment.
The Board approved the capital expenditure requirements on the basis that it would strengthen and improve operational and organisational processes, which was beneficial to the Group’s North America employees, clients and suppliers.
Stakeholder impact: People
Clients
Suppliers
81 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Governance
Anne-Françoise Nesmes was appointed Chair of the Audit Committee in February 2021 and is the serving Chief Financial Officer of Smith+Nephew PLC. She is a chartered management accountant and is considered by the Board to have recent and relevant financial experience and to be competent in auditing and accounting.
Committee membership comprises the Chair of the Committee and all of the non-executive directors (other than the Chair of the Board). Each member of the Committee has appropriate financial and commercial experience in multinational and/or complex organisations, combined with a sound understanding of the Company’s business, and is therefore considered by the Board to be competent in the Company’s sector. The expertise and experience of the directors can be found in the biographies on pages 59 to 61.
The Board considers each member of the Committee to be independent in accordance with the criteria set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the Code) and capable of assessing the work of management, the assurances provided by the Internal Audit function and the external auditor, as well as the effectiveness of the risk management and internal control systems. Members of the Committee are appointed by the Board following recommendation by the Nomination Committee.
The Committee meets at least three times a year. The quorum for a meeting is two members. The Committee held three meetings during the year. The meetings attendance table can be found on page 69.
The Chair of the Committee reports to the Board on Committee activities and engages regularly with key individuals involved with the Company’s governance. The Chair also has regular contact with the external Senior Statutory Audit Partner and attends the AGM to respond to any shareholder questions that might be raised on the Committee’s activities.
Only members of the Committee have the right to attend Committee meetings. Other individuals such as the Chair of the Board, the Group CEO, Group CFO, Group Financial Controller, Director of Financial Planning & Analysis, Group Director of Risk and Internal Audit, Group Chief Information Officer (CIO), Group Head of Tax, Group Head of Ethics and Integrity (E&I) and external advisers, may be invited to attend all or part of any meetings, as and when appropriate. The Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, who acts as Secretary to the Committee, attends all meetings of the Committee. The external auditor also attends all meetings of the Committee. Other members of senior management are invited to present such reports as are required for the Committee to discharge its duties.
At the end of every meeting, Committee members hold private discussions with the external auditor, without executive management and other invitees being present. Committee members also have discussions with the Group Director of Risk and Internal Audit without executive management and other invitees being present.
Anne-Françoise Nesmes
Chair of the Audit Committee
The Committee is authorised to seek external legal and independent professional advice as it sees fit. The terms of reference of the Audit Committee are reviewed annually to ensure they continue to be fit for purpose. They were last reviewed in September 2023. The review concluded that the terms of reference of the Committee in their current form continue to reflect best practice. A copy of the terms of reference can be found on our website, www.compass-group.com.
The Committee has an annual agenda which is aligned to the terms of reference and key events in the Company’s financial calendar. The agenda is flexible enough to include additional topics of particular importance to the Committee and to allow it to respond to emerging issues.
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the integrity of the Company’s and the Group’s published financial statements and related disclosures; and for assessing any formal announcements relating to the Group’s financial reporting matters, as well as key accounting and audit judgements related to the preparation of the Company’s and the Group’s financial statements.The Committee’s other responsibilities include: – reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the risk management and internal control systems, including the Group’s key internal controls over financial reporting and IT controls framework, and providing assurance to the Board – reviewing the going concern and viability statements – monitoring and reviewing the role, mandate and effectiveness of the Group’s Internal Audit function – managing the selection, appointment, independence, effectiveness and remuneration of the Group’s external auditor, including compliance with the Non-Audit Services Policy. In the year, this included primary responsibility for a formal statutory audit tender process – reviewing arrangements for the Group’s workforce/stakeholders to raise concerns in confidence about possible improprieties in financial reporting or other matters (via Speak Up, We’re Listening), and ensuring that they are investigated – advising the Board on how it has discharged its responsibilities and considering whether the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and providing assurance to the Board The key priorities of the Committee during the year under review are described in the pages that follow.
During the year, the Committee reviewed the interim and annual financial statements and considered the following:
– whether the description of the performance of the Group in the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy
– the clarity of disclosures and compliance with financial reporting standards and relevant financial and governance reporting requirements and guidelines, including Alternative Performance Measures
– the accounting policies adopted in the Group’s financial statements, any proposed changes to them and the adequacy of their disclosure
– the significant transactions, accounting matters, and key judgements and estimates used in preparing the 2023 Annual Report and Accounts and the interim financial statements and in particular management’s assumptions underpinning the going concern and viability statements
– the Company’s disclosure in the Strategic Report on the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) reporting requirements, and related disclosures in the financial statements
– non-financial key performance indicators (KPIs)
– consideration of the potential implications of the UK BEIS White Paper: Restoring Trust in Audit and Corporate Governance and the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) consultation on the UK Corporate Governance Code
The Committee is responsible for considering the significant areas of complexity, management judgement and estimation in relation to the financial statements. Set out in the table below are the significant areas of accounting judgement or management estimation and a description of how the Committee concluded that such judgements and estimations were appropriate.
| Areas of significant accounting judgement and estimation | How each was addressed by the Committee |
|---|---|
| Carrying value of goodwill | The Group undertakes a formal goodwill impairment exercise for its cash-generating units at least once a year in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, based on the most recent approved budget and financial plan. The Group tests at least annually whether goodwill has suffered any impairment in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, based on the most recent budgets and plans that have been formally approved by management. The recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill involves the use of assumptions, including operating cash flow forecasts, long-term growth rates and discount rates. The Committee reviewed the key assumptions used to assess the recoverability of goodwill, including the higher discount rates caused by the increases in market interest rates in the year, and concluded that these were appropriate. The Committee noted that the headroom in the UK cash-generating unit is sensitive to reasonably possible changes in key assumptions. The Committee reviewed the goodwill impairment assessment disclosures and concluded that these were appropriate. |
| Tax | The Group operates in multiple tax jurisdictions and is subject to the rules of their various taxation authorities. Due to the complexity and changing nature of tax rules and transfer pricing across multiple tax jurisdictions, a degree of judgement is required in determining levels of tax recognised in the financial statements. The Committee oversaw the development and reporting of the Company’s and the Group’s direct tax strategy. It assessed the impact of changes in the approach of governments to tax and discussed with management the key judgements made. The Committee also reviewed disclosures on contingent tax liabilities. KPMG, the external auditor, reported on significant provisions to the Committee. Based on the above, the Committee was satisfied that the level of tax provisioning and tax disclosures for the Group remained appropriate. |
| Strategic portfolio review | The Group has continued its strategic portfolio review of non-core activities to allow the focus of its resources on its core operations, which in the year resulted in the exit from several countries, including Central and Eastern Europe (Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Romania), and the sale of a business, site closures, and contract renegotiations and terminations in the UK. The Committee considered the accounting consequences of the ongoing strategic portfolio review. This included the derecognition of assets and recoverability of deferred consideration for exited business. In relation to the review of non-core activities in the UK, the Committee reviewed the key judgements made by management, including provisions for impairment made in respect of ongoing obligations for closed sites, and for the related contract negotiations and terminations. The external auditor reported on these matters to the Committee. The Committee was also satisfied with management’s disclosure of the charge outside underlying operating profit on the basis that it was a material, unusual item and did not arise in the ordinary course of trading. |
| Post-employment benefits | The Group’s defined benefit pension schemes are assessed half-yearly in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits. The present value of the defined benefit liabilities is based on assumptions determined following independent actuarial advice. The Committee considered management’s valuation of the liabilities of the Group’s post- employment benefit schemes, which is sensitive to actuarial assumptions, including discount rates, inflation, pension and salary increases, and mortality and other demographic assumptions. The Committee considered the external auditor’s assessment of the reasonableness of the assumptions, together with a comparison of the assumptions to those made by other companies, and was satisfied that the assumptions made with respect to post-employment benefits were appropriate. |
| Going concern and viability | The going concern and viability statements were reviewed in detail. The assumptions and evidence supporting the going concern and viability statements were reviewed and challenged by the Committee. Financial models of scenarios prepared by management over the assessment periods were considered by the Committee, as well as the liquidity position of the Group, the principal risks, the level of headroom against committed facilities and compliance with financial covenants attached to issued debt. Having considered in detail the analysis undertaken and the assessment of the external auditor, the Committee was satisfied that the going concern and viability statements were appropriate. |
The Code provides that the Board should provide a fair, balanced and understandable assessment of the Company’s position and prospects in its Annual Report and Accounts. At the Board’s request, the Committee has reviewed the 2023 Annual Report and Accounts to determine whether it considers the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, meets this standard and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy. The Committee has concluded that this requirement has been met. Throughout the Annual Report and Accounts, performance during the year is presented against a mix of financial and non-financial KPIs, which the Board and executive management consider best reflect the Company’s strategic priorities. The Committee has considered these KPIs and is satisfied that the information that has been selected by the Board and executive management will help to convey an understanding of the performance and the culture of the business, and the drivers which contribute to its success, and will be of interest to stakeholders.
During the year, the Committee was updated on the proposal to change the Group’s presentation currency from sterling to US dollars from 1 October 2023 so as to provide greater transparency of the Group’s performance and to reduce foreign exchange volatility. The Committee also noted the planned timeline for implementation and reviewed the approach and the implementation plan. Additionally, the Committee considered the external reaction to the change, including communications. Having considered these matters, the Committee recommended the change of presentation currency to the Board for approval.
The Committee is responsible for reviewing the Company’s internal financial controls and internal control and risk management systems.# Audit Committee Report
During the year, the Committee:
– received and discussed regular reports summarising: the Group’s risk management activities; the identification of any changes to principal risks including the impact of macroeconomic and elevated geopolitical factors; and emerging risks such as the development of generative artificial intelligence (AI), and the actions taken to mitigate these risks; the findings from internal audits, and the status of resultant actions agreed with management
– reviewed and approved the internal audit plan for 2024 and monitored delivery of the 2023 plan
– reviewed the resources, terms of reference and effectiveness of the Internal Audit and Risk Management function
– reviewed arrangements for the Group’s workforce/stakeholders to raise concerns in confidence about possible improprieties in financial reporting or other matters (via Speak Up, We’re Listening), including arrangements for investigating such matters
– received presentations from the Group Head of E&I in relation to business integrity risks and Speak Up, We’re Listening cases and investigations in relation to theft and fraud
– received regular reports from the Head of Group Tax on tax policies, uncertain tax positions, and tax audits and inquiries
– received updates on the activities of the Regional Governance Committees
– received updates in relation to cyber-security arrangements
– considered the assurance provided over the implementation of new enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in the Group in the US and Europe
The Audit Committee reviews the integrity of any material financial statements made by the Company. It monitors and conducts a robust review of the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control systems, accounting policies and practices and certain compliance controls (including key financial controls) as well as the Company’s statements on internal control, before they are agreed by the Board for inclusion in the Annual Report and Accounts.
Management have defined a set of key internal controls over financial reporting which must be complied with by all countries. During the year, these key internal controls over financial reporting have been updated by the Group Financial Control team to ensure compliance with best practice, regulations and standards. These updates were reviewed by the Committee.
Compliance with the key internal controls over financial reporting is tested by Group Internal Audit annually for the Group’s top 10 countries and on a rotational basis for other countries, and the results are reported to the Committee.
In accordance with the guidance set out in the FRC’s Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting 2014, and in the Code itself, the Group has established a risk management framework. This has been in place for the full financial year and up to the date on which the financial statements were approved. The framework is designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve the Group’s strategic objectives, to safeguard the Group’s assets against material loss, to fairly report the Group’s performance and position, and to ensure compliance with relevant legislation and regulation including that related to social, environmental and ethical matters. The framework provides reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss. Further details of the Group’s risk management framework and principal risks are set out on pages 24 to 30.
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the risk management framework. As part of this process, Group companies submit biannual certificates of assurance to the Group CFO on internal control and risk management matters. The Group CFO summarises these submissions for the Audit Committee, and the Chair of the Audit Committee reports to the Board on any matters that have arisen from the Committee’s review of the way in which risk management and internal control processes have been applied. The Committee annually reviews and considers the effectiveness of Compass’ approach to risk management and any changes to the risk policy. The Committee and the Board remain satisfied that the Company’s risk management framework continues to operate effectively and provides the necessary flexibility without compromising the integrity of risk management and internal control systems.
The Audit Committee receives updates on any allegations of theft or fraud in the businesses, with individual updates being given to the Committee, as needed, in more serious cases. The Group’s new Business Integrity Policy (BIP) and recently refreshed Code of Business Conduct (CBC) strictly prohibit any involvement in theft or fraudulent activities whatsoever. The BIP sets out the expectations for risk assessing, reporting and documenting any fraud, in accordance with local requirements, and the Speak and Listen Up Policy. It also sets out how allegations and incidents are to be followed up such as through investigations conducted by Internal Audit, E&I or Legal teams. Fraud and theft reports are consolidated at Group level, and feed into the regular updates presented to the Committee.
Audit Committee report continued
84 Governance
The Corporate Responsibility Committee oversees the continued development of the Group’s overall E&I programme, the training of employees on key business integrity risk areas and the way in which management obtains assurance in this area, including the annual self-certification process via E&I’s pledge and declaration. More information on the CBC, and the Speak Up, We’re Listening programme is set out on pages 13 and 14. The CBC is available on the Company’s website, www.compass-group.com/en/who-we-are/ethics-and-integrity
Information systems and cyber-security risk continues to pose a threat to the Group and remains a principal risk. The Committee received reports from the Group CIO on progress made on the implementation of the IT controls framework, including enhanced security operations, threat intelligence, the Group’s response to the increased threat of ransomware, and the continued drive on cyber-risk awareness and training across the Group.
In November 2022, the Committee reviewed IT systems back up and restoration, crisis management and phishing benchmark data, and the Group CIO briefed the Committee on the resilience of the Group’s technology estate. The briefing provided the Committee with a more detailed overview which included business continuity, the IT control framework, cyber insurance, public cloud resilience and the arrangements to protect information assets of the greatest value to the Group. The Committee reflected on the arrangements in place and the steps taken to further enhance the Group’s resilience capabilities, and its ability to respond to cyber-attacks and noted the priorities for 2023.
At its meeting in May 2023, the Committee considered examples of IT security incidents that had occurred in the Group’s businesses together with the preventative measures and subsequent actions taken to limit the impact on operations. The Committee was also briefed on the outcome of a proactive ethical hacking exercise that had been conducted in conjunction with its cyber-security providers and advisers in over half of the Group’s top 10 countries in order to identify potential weaknesses. The Committee was advised that the exercise had identified some operational weaknesses which had been addressed and the solutions validated by the Group’s independent external adviser to ensure that the remedial actions had been appropriately implemented.
The Group’s proactive efforts to limit exposure to phishing attacks were also discussed, including the roll out of additional technology, implementation of regular phishing simulations to help educate colleagues, the annual Cyber Awareness Week, and ongoing weekly advocacy messages from ‘cyber champions’ across the Group’s businesses.
At each meeting during the year, the Committee received updates from management in relation to the implementation of the ERP systems in Europe and North America. In Europe, an ERP system is being introduced as part of a business transformation programme designed to improve consistency, efficiency and the working lives of unit managers and colleagues through the implementation of common data, processes and systems across finance, operations and procurement. The Committee reviewed with management the governance structures around the programme, the quality assurance plan focused on key risks, and the outcomes of assurance audits timed to inform key decisions. The Committee also monitored the progress of the roll out of the system and considered the output of post-implementation project validation and migration reviews.
In North America, a similar programme is being implemented to introduce an ERP system to simplify processes, create efficiencies and help improve data accuracy. The Committee reviewed and challenged the proposed governance and assurance arrangements around the programme to ensure that both the programmes were closely aligned and that lessons learned from the implementation in Europe were used to benefit the North America programme. The Committee monitored the progress focusing on timeline, costs and benefits, together with programme controls and assurance.
The Internal Audit team is led by the Group Director of Risk and Internal Audit who reports functionally to the Chair of the Audit Committee and operationally to the Group CFO. The purpose, scope and authority of the Internal Audit function are set out in its terms of reference which are approved by the Committee.The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the Group’s Internal Audit function, including resources, plans and performance as well as the degree to which the function is free from management or other restrictions. To help the Committee gain assurance that the Internal Audit function is independent, the Committee meets with the Group Director of Risk and Internal Audit at least once a year without the presence of management. The Committee met with the Group Director of Risk and Internal Audit on two occasions during the year under review without the presence of management. During the year, the Committee monitored the performance of Internal Audit. The Committee reviewed and approved the Group’s annual internal audit plan. The plan is designed with reference to the Group’s principal risks. Further information on the principal risks is available on pages 26 to 30. The Committee receives regular updates on progress against the plan and Internal Audit’s findings, together with management actions taken to address recommendations. The Committee recognises that IT risks and technology complexity have increased significantly in recent years due to cyber-security threats, data privacy regulations, IT governance and AI, and has supported the expansion of the Internal Audit function with the addition of IT audit capability. The Committee remains satisfied that the Internal Audit function has the necessary resources, objectivity, and competency to fulfil its mandate. It has also satisfied itself that the Internal Audit function has adequate standing and is free from management influence or other restrictions.
85Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The Audit Committee is responsible for the development, implementation and monitoring of the Company’s policy on external audit and has oversight responsibility for monitoring the external auditor’s independence, objectivity and compliance with ethical, professional and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is responsible for the re-tendering selection process and recommends the appointment, reappointment and removal of the Company’s external auditor, and considers the risks associated with its withdrawal from the market in its risk evaluation and planning. The Audit Committee also reviews and sets the terms, areas of responsibility and scope of the audit as set out in the external auditor’s engagement letter including the overall work plan for the forthcoming year, together with the associated fee proposal and cost-effectiveness of the audit.
During the year, the Committee considered the effectiveness of the external audit process, whether the agreed audit plan for the financial year ended 30 September 2022 had been fulfilled, and the reasons for any variation from the plan. The Committee is committed to ensuring that Compass receives a high-quality and effective external audit. The Committee assessed the effectiveness of the external audit process through a number of methods, commencing with the identification of appropriate risks by the external auditor. These were reviewed by the Committee in the detailed external audit plan for the financial year ended 30 September 2023 at the start of the audit cycle. The work performed on these risks by the auditor was used to test management’s assumptions and estimates. The effectiveness of the audit process in addressing these matters was assessed through the reports presented to the Committee at the half and full-year. The Committee also considered how and to what extent the auditor had exercised professional scepticism. During the audit of the Annual Report and Accounts, the auditor challenged management as to whether the disclosures in the financial statements were consistent with the narrative disclosures in the Strategic Report in relation to the impact of certain risks and, specifically, how the potential impact of climate change on the financial statements had been assessed. The auditor also challenged management’s approach to goodwill impairment testing and the appropriateness of actuarial assumptions used to estimate post-retirement benefit obligations, as well as other sources of estimation uncertainty, such as uncertain tax positions and accounting consequences of the ongoing strategic portfolio review. Management and the auditors engaged constructively in relation to the challenges raised and an unmodified opinion was issued by the auditor, which is set out on pages 132 to 143. The review also included a formal evaluation process covering several aspects of the external audit. A wide range of internal stakeholders including Audit Committee members, regional finance directors and Group functions (including Internal Audit, Legal, Finance and Tax) and local finance directors (excluding countries not in scope for the KPMG LLP audit) completed questionnaires. A detailed report on KPMG’s audit quality and effectiveness was presented to the Committee at its meeting in May 2023. The findings were considered and opportunities for improvement were discussed with KPMG. In summary, the Committee concluded that the external audit process continued to be of a high quality and remained effective.
Zulfikar Walji was the Senior Statutory Audit Partner for the year under review. To ensure the independence and objectivity of the Company’s external auditor and the integrity of the audit process, key members of the external audit team periodically rotate off the Company’s audit. Additionally, the recruitment of senior employees from the Company’s auditor is not permitted for a period of at least two years after they cease to be involved in the provision of services to the Company. The audit of the 2023 Annual Report and Accounts will be Mr Walji’s final audit for Compass Group PLC. Mr Walji will be succeeded by Mr Jonathan Downer as the Senior Statutory Audit Partner. In assessing the independence and objectivity of the external auditor, the Committee takes into account the assurances and information provided by the external auditor at the planning stage of the audit, including a written disclosure of the relationships (including the provision of non-audit services) that could have an impact on the external auditor’s independence and objectivity, and the safeguards put in place to address such concerns. As part of this process, the Committee receives a statement from the external auditor advising that all partners and staff annually confirm their compliance with KPMG’s ethics and independence policies and procedures including, in particular, that they have no prohibited shareholdings, and their ethics and independence policies are fully consistent with the requirements of the FRC Ethical Standard. The Committee has concluded that KPMG was independent of the Group for the year under review.
The Company operates a policy on non-audit-related fees which it reviews annually and under which it discloses the ratio of audit to non-audit fees paid in each financial year. The Committee monitors the level of non-audit work which the external auditor can perform, to ensure that any provision of non-audit services falls within the scope of the agreed Non-Audit Work Policy and does not impair the external auditor’s objectivity or independence. The Group’s policy on non-audit services is aligned with the FRC’s 2019 Ethical Standard for auditing practices for what is permissible for public interest entities, and no services outside this are approved by the Committee. Engagements for non-audit services that are not prohibited are subject to formal approval by the Audit Committee based on the level of fees involved. Non-audit services that are pre-approved are either routine in nature (e.g. the half-year limited review) with a fee which is not significant in the context of the audit or are other audit-related services. Within the constraints of applicable UK rules, the external auditor could undertake certain non-audit work. The provision of non-audit services within such constraints and the agreed policy is assessed on a case-by-case basis to ensure that the adviser best placed to undertake the work is retained. In accordance with the Group’s policies, the Group CFO approves individual non-audit services with fees up to £50,000 and non-audit services with combined fees up to £100,000. Audit Committee approval is sought for non-audit services exceeding these limits.
Audit Committee report continued
86
The total fees paid to KPMG in the year ended 30 September 2023 were £8.0 million, of which £0.3 million related to non-audit work (2022: £7.1 million of which £0.3 million related to non-audit work). Having considered the non-audit work undertaken by KPMG LLP during the year, it was agreed by the Committee that the tasks undertaken represent permitted non-audit services (as set out in Section 5 of the FRC’s Revised Ethical Standard 2019). The principal non-audit services provided by KPMG related to the half-year review of the Group’s interim financial report, and comfort letters in respect of government support schemes and comfort letters for the annual extension of the Euro Medium Term Note programme. The Committee believes that KPMG, as external auditor, was best placed to undertake these non-audit services and that the level of fees for these services did not adversely impact its integrity, objectivity or independence. Further disclosure on the non-audit fees paid during the year can be found in note 3 on page 156.
In accordance with its terms of reference and regulatory requirements, the Audit Committee ensures that at least once every 10 years the external audit services contract is put out to tender. The Committee is responsible for the selection and appointment of the external auditor.# Audit Committee Report
It initiates and conducts any competitive tender process undertaken by the Company for the provision of external audit services and considers and makes recommendations to the Board, to be put to shareholders for approval at the Company’s AGM. The Committee confirms that for the year under review the Company complied with the provisions of the Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014. KPMG LLP was initially appointed as the Company’s external auditor in March 2014, succeeding Deloitte LLP. KPMG’s audit for the year ended 30 September 2023 is therefore its 10th year, and as a result, Compass was required to complete a formal tender process for a new auditor in advance of the audit for the financial year ending 2024.
Compass announced its intention to commence a formal audit tender process in its 2022 Annual Report and that the outcome would be announced in due course, with a recommendation to be made to shareholders at the 2024 AGM. The Audit Committee has primary responsibility for the audit tender process. At its meeting in September 2022, the Committee agreed the stages of the process, timeline, and selection criteria. The Committee’s key objectives throughout the tender process, and in making its recommendation to the Board, was to ensure that Compass appointed an audit firm that would provide a high-quality, effective audit.
To ensure an effective and efficient tender process, the Audit Committee established a Sub-Committee comprising the Audit Committee Chair, and two other Audit Committee members, John Bryant and Arlene Isaacs-Lowe (the Sub-Committee), to meet with the candidate firms to consider the tender submissions and to receive presentations from them. The Sub-Committee was supported by the Group CFO, the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, and the Group Financial Controller who was responsible for coordinating the audit tender process. The Committee was kept up to date throughout the tender process by the Chair of the Committee. The timeline of the process, which started in October 2022 (well in advance of the last possible date to ensure a wider choice of audit firms and partners), is set out below. The process was managed in such a way as to allow adequate time to consider the merits of the proposals of the candidate firms and recommend the preferred firm to the Board for appointment in advance of the commencement of the audit for the financial year ending 30 September 2024.
| Year | Month | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | October | – request for proposal issued |
| November | – introductory meetings between Sub-Committee, key management and candidate audit firms | |
| December | – data room available to candidate audit firms | |
| 2023 | February | – meetings between Sub-Committee, key management and candidate audit firms |
| April | – audit proposals submitted to Compass – presentations to the Sub-Committee and key management | |
| May | – Audit Committee recommendation to the Board and Board approval |
At the outset, before the request for proposal (RFP) was issued, the Audit Committee considered the FRC’s requirement for mid-tier external audit firms to be invited to tender for FTSE 100 audits. After careful consideration, the Committee concluded that those firms did not have a genuine prospect of success in the tender because they did not have the global reach and depth of experience to achieve a high-quality audit for a group of the scale and complexity of Compass. The Committee therefore concluded that only the ‘Big Four’ firms had the global reach and depth of experience to provide the appropriate level of audit services to Compass.
Of the ‘Big Four’, two firms did not participate in the tender process. The first of these was considered to be conflicted due to the services it provides in relation to cyber security and tax advice, and the second declined to participate. Invitations to submit tender proposals were therefore extended to the two remaining ‘Big Four’ firms, which included the incumbent.
Written responses to the RFP were assessed by the core team against the following criteria:
– audit quality
– audit approach, scope, and methodology
– the lead engagement partner
– the engagement team: specifically, experience of working effectively together; technical accounting knowledge and, where relevant, experience of transitioning an audit
– sector and global plc experience and understanding
– approach to resolving issues or matters of judgement
– sustainability credentials
– independence
– audit innovation
– global coordination and communication
– fees
87
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
As described above, the two firms provided a written response to the tender RFP and presented their proposals to the Sub-Committee at meetings also attended by the Group CFO, Group General Counsel and Company Secretary and Group Financial Controller in April 2023. This provided an opportunity to explore the areas within the selection criteria, and to assess the quality of the key members of the candidate audit teams. The Sub-Committee considered the tender submissions and presentations from the audit teams and the extent to which they met the selection criteria. The Sub-Committee agreed both proposals would deliver a quality external audit. Overall, the Sub-Committee concluded the incumbent was its preferred candidate due to the strength of the wider team, and significant understanding and tailored approach to the audit of the Group.
The Sub-Committee recommended to the Audit Committee that KPMG LLP be reappointed for up to 10 years in accordance with relevant legislation and regulations. The Audit Committee supported the Sub-Committee’s recommendation. At its meeting on 4 May 2023, the Board approved the Committee’s proposal to reappoint KPMG LLP as statutory auditor of the Company for the financial year ending 30 September 2024, subject to shareholder approval.
There are no contractual obligations that restrict the Committee’s choice of auditor, the recommendation is free from third-party influence and no auditor liability agreement has been entered into. KPMG has expressed its willingness to continue as auditor of the Company. Separate resolutions proposing KPMG LLP’s appointment and the determination of its remuneration by the Audit Committee will be proposed at the 2024 AGM. The Committee would like to thank both firms for their professionalism and the quality of their submissions.
During the year, the Committee received regular updates from management and the external auditor on developments in relation to the FRC’s consultation on a new UK Corporate Governance Code and other legislative changes. In particular, the Committee received briefing notes on the consultation in general, and the proposed introduction of an Audit and Assurance Policy under the draft Companies (Strategic Report and Directors’ Report) (Amendment) Regulations 2023. The Committee considered management’s plans to respond to these evolving requirements, including updates to the key internal controls over financial reporting.
Subsequently, the Committee noted that the UK Department of Business and Trade (DBT) has withdrawn the draft Companies (Strategic Report and Directors’ Report) (Amendment) Regulations 2023 and the FRC has withdrawn certain proposed changes to the Code, which were part of the package of measures to implement the UK Government’s audit and corporate governance reforms. The Committee will continue to monitor developments in this area.
The priorities set by the Committee as a result of last year’s external evaluation process were:
– continuing to focus on meeting management, including time management, and ensuring sufficient time is spent on Committee priorities
– continuing training, particularly with regard to TCFD and sustainability reporting, together with other corporate reporting changes
– further developing year-end reporting to support the Committee’s review of the integrity of financial controls
– continuing positive engagement with the external auditor
These themes, together with the Committee’s regular programme of work, shaped the Committee’s agenda and were included in the principal activities during the year under review.
During the year, an internal evaluation of the effectiveness of the Committee was conducted as part of the wider evaluation of the Board and its committees. Details can be found on page 96. The evaluation concluded that the Committee continued to operate effectively.
The Committee will continue to focus on the following areas:
– audit and governance reforms including assurance over non-financial reporting; and
– ESG and climate net zero disclosures
These matters, together with the regular work of the Committee, will inform the Committee’s agenda for the coming year.
Anne-Françoise Nesmes
Chair of the Audit Committee
20 November 2023
88
Governance
Nelson Silva was appointed Chair of the Corporate Responsibility (CR) Committee in February 2017. Membership of the Committee comprises the Chair of the Committee and all the independent non-executive directors, the Chair of the Board, the Group Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Group Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Biographies of Committee members can be found on pages 58 to 61. Members of the Committee are appointed by the Board following recommendation by the Nomination Committee. The Committee meets at least three times a year. The quorum for a meeting is two, one of which must be an independent non-executive director. The Committee held three meetings during the year. Meeting attendance can be found in the table on page 69.# Corporate Responsibility Committee Report
The Chair of the Committee reports to the Board on Committee activities and attends the AGM to respond to any shareholder questions that might be raised on the Committee’s activities. Only members of the Committee have the right to attend Committee meetings. Other individuals, such as the Group Chief Commercial Officer (CCO), the Group Chief People Officer (CPO), Group Head of Ethics and Integrity (E&I) and external advisers, may be invited to attend all or part of any meeting, as and when appropriate. The Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, who acts as Secretary to the Committee, attends all meetings of the Committee. Other members of senior management are invited to present such reports as are required for the Committee to discharge its duties. The Committee is authorised to seek external legal or independent professional advice as it sees fit. The terms of reference of the Committee are reviewed annually to ensure they continue to be fit for purpose. They were last reviewed in September 2023. The review concluded that the terms of reference continue to reflect best practice. A copy of the terms of reference can be found on our website, www.compass-group.com.
Nelson Silva
Chair of the Corporate Responsibility Committee
The Committee is responsible for overseeing, monitoring and making recommendations to the Board on the development, implementation and effectiveness of the Group’s People, Corporate Responsibility, Health, Safety and Sustainability (including climate change), E&I, and Stakeholder Engagement strategies. Examples of the Committee’s activities across these key themes during the year are set out in the pages that follow.
The health and safety (H&S) of the Group’s employees and consumers is a top priority for Compass and the Committee receives regular H&S reports from the Group CCO to enable it to monitor performance. The Group has two key performance indicators (KPIs) linked to the H&S of colleagues and consumers: the Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate (LTIFR) and the Food Safety Incident Rate (FSIR). The Committee sets limits for these KPIs at the beginning of the year and monitored performance over the course of the year to enable it to assess the effectiveness of the controls in place to mitigate the occurrence of LTIFR and FSIR incidents across the businesses. Performance outcomes are linked to the executive director and senior management annual bonus plan, and the results for the financial year ended 2023, which the Committee is pleased to report are within the limits set at the start of the year, can be found on page 7.
As part of the Group’s drive to continuously improve its safety culture, in September, the Committee considered and approved a move from the LTIFR H&S workplace performance measure to the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) H&S workplace performance measure for the financial year ending 2024, reflecting the continuing maturity of Compass’ safety culture. TRIFR is generally considered to be a more holistic measurement as it includes all injury types, and from 2024 it will be used in place of LTIFR as a performance measure in relation to the annual bonus plan for executive directors and other senior management. Further details on the ESG measures in the annual bonus plan can be found in the Remuneration Committee report on pages 116 to 117 and 120.
89Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
At each meeting the Committee considers a safety moment relating to topical aspects of health or safety, or lessons learned from a recent incident. Each briefing aims to provide the Committee with a fuller understanding of the H&S matters faced by the businesses and how the lessons learned from such incidents are applied to mitigate the risk of a recurrence. In the financial year ended 2023, safety moments included the use of geothermal energy for cooking and the launch of a new global safety portal designed to support safety communities across Compass.
In addition to the regular safety moments, in November 2022, the Committee reviewed a deep-dive on safety performance in the Group’s largest business in North America with the Vice President of Risk Management. The Committee was briefed on the outcome of the North America business LTIFR and FSIR performance for the financial year ended 2022, which was within the limits set at the beginning of the year. The Committee also reviewed how, over time and through a period of considerable growth, the North America business had developed its people and risk management systems to create a more active approach to safety which provides management with data-driven insights and real-time reporting. The Committee also considered the safety focus areas for 2023 designed to build on the active safety culture in the business. These areas included the introduction of predictive analytics, training for colleagues to further develop competency and capability, safety innovation and the assessment and further advancement of the Group’s safety culture. The Committee acknowledged the contribution of North America’s management and colleagues which had resulted in an industry-leading safety performance for 2022 when benchmarked against recognised external metrics. The regional financial performance of the North America business can be found on page 22. H&S performance results for the region for 2023, which are linked to the annual bonus for the Chief Operating Officer, North America, can be found on page 117.
The Committee oversees the Group’s E&I strategy, programme, policies and activities, and receives regular presentations and reports from the Group Head of E&I. At its meeting in November 2022, the Committee received an update on the Group’s E&I programme of activities, implementation strategy and the positive progress made during the financial year ended 2022, which was reflected in the cultural indicators and insights gathered from pulse surveys. The output from the surveys and other programme performance indicators provided the Committee with further assurance that, overall, the programme continues to strengthen, adopting a prioritised, risk-based approach.
A summary of the E&I priorities and forward plan for 2023 was reviewed by the Committee, which included activities to further embed Group policies and processes, continued implementation of key integrity controls, improvements in the management of higher-risk third parties, enhanced monitoring and oversight procedures, and continued measurement of the Group’s culture of integrity, and the effectiveness of its Speak Up, We’re Listening programme. The Committee was also briefed on the self-assessment risk review undertaken across all countries in the Group using a tool provided by an independent external law firm, which validated the design and priorities of the E&I programme, and identified opportunities for improvement. Additionally, Internal Audit carried out an assurance review of the Speak Up, We’re Listening arrangements, and concluded that they continue to operate effectively and remain fit for purpose.
At its meeting in May 2023, the Committee approved the new Compass Code of Business Conduct (CBC) and recommended it to the Board for approval. The CBC sets out the expected behaviours for everyone working with, for, or on behalf of Compass, including temporary and contract staff, regardless of location, role or level of seniority and is underpinned by Compass’ corporate values which continue to shape and further embed a strong governance and ethical culture across the Group.
During the year, the Group E&I team continued to embed its refreshed strategy and priorities, partnering with a network of regional and country E&I leaders, who promote and support awareness initiatives and training campaigns, and lead on local E&I programme activities; and in September this year, the Committee reviewed the progress made during the year to further embed the E&I programme through the use of a clear and comprehensive policy framework. The Committee also reviewed the priorities for the year ahead which included continuing to embed third-party integrity due diligence as part of local processes, improving management of high-risk third parties, enhancing monitoring and oversight procedures, and optimising existing compliance tools and technologies. Learn more about our E&I and Speak Up, We’re Listening programmes on our website, www.compass-group.com/en/who-we-are/ethics-and-integrity
Corporate Responsibility Committee report continued
90 Governance
During the year, the Committee continued its focus on sustainability and climate-related matters. In November 2022, the Committee received a presentation from the Group CCO setting out the two-year roadmap for the development of the Company’s disclosures under the TCFD requirements, taking into account the FRC’s thematic review of TCFD disclosures and climate-related disclosures in financial statements. The Committee also considered other reporting frameworks, including the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the US SEC Climate Disclosure Rules, and the International Sustainability Standards Board sustainability disclosure standards.
During the year, the Committee reviewed with management the Group’s sustainability strategy including the plans to reach climate net zero by 2050. The Committee reviewed the progress made during the year on reducing the Group’s Scope 1 and 2 emissions. The Committee also considered the Group’s key activities to reduce Scope 3 emissions which centred around food waste reduction, re-engineering menus and collaboration with suppliers. The Committee also received an update on progress on the UK&I business’ commitment to reach climate net zero by 2030, and reviewed the roadmap in detail.# Corporate Responsibility Committee
More detail of Compass’ progress on its sustainability strategy and net zero commitments can be found in the Purpose report on pages 38 to 44. In September 2023, the Committee reviewed the Company’s proposed TCFD disclosures to be included in the 2023 Annual Report and Accounts. In addition, the Committee received a training session led by the Sustainability team, external advisers and the Company’s external auditor on the wider ESG landscape, including forthcoming sustainability disclosure requirements. Further information can be found on page 73.
To better understand and mitigate the Group’s food waste footprint, the use of food waste tracking technology has been expanded across the Group’s operations to help towards Compass’ commitment to halve food waste in its operations by 2030. Aligned to this commitment, the Group introduced a non-financial food waste performance measure related to the number of sites across the Group’s businesses adopting the technology for the financial year ended 2023. Achievement of the food waste performance measure is linked to 5% of the annual bonus of executive directors and senior management. The Committee is pleased to report that excellent progress has been made during the year with 7,943 sites globally now employing food waste tracking technology to record food waste. More details on the Group’s sustainability initiatives, including information regarding the Group’s Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions is set out on pages 38 to 54.
Overseeing the development, implementation and effectiveness of the Group’s people policies, strategies, processes and initiatives continues to be an important aspect of the Committee’s work, and to assist the Committee, it receives regular reports and presentations from the Group CPO.
In November 2022, the Committee reviewed the results of the global employee engagement surveys conducted in the financial year ended 2022, in which colleagues were asked to rate their experience of working at Compass. The surveys covered a wide range of topics including feeling valued, motivation, respect, teamwork, health and wellbeing, culture, and confidence in the Group’s leaders. The Committee noted the increase in participation rates and that engagement scores had remained stable since 2019 despite the significant impact of COVID-19 on people’s sense of wellbeing. The results gathered from the surveys were used to identify areas of focus for 2023 including inclusion, career management, reward and recognition, and wellbeing. The Committee was also advised of several initiatives across the Group to help support colleagues, including the provision of free or subsidised food, raising financial awareness and providing tools to help employees manage their finances, access to emergency funds, employee counselling and health and wellbeing support, flexible working options, and access to overtime working.
In the year, the Committee was also updated on the highlights of the US Your Voice employee engagement survey, noting the high participation rates. The outcome of the survey indicated to the Committee that engagement remained strong among US colleagues and that the people strategy for the region was having a positive impact. The Committee concurred with management’s view that the outcome was positive overall when taken in the context of the large number of new colleagues recruited and inducted to support the re-opening of the business following the COVID-19 pandemic.
During the year, the Committee reviewed summaries of the roundtable meetings which the DNED, Ireena Vittal had held with employees from across the Group’s businesses. Mrs Vittal shared observations from her meetings, noting that common themes included hiring and retention, solving issues through technology and the desire among colleagues to share best practices. The roundtable meetings revealed that, in the main, employees remain very engaged and are proud to work for Compass.
Two further employee roundtables were held in the year, hosted by non-executive director, Arlene Isaacs-Lowe, one of which was in support of the UK&I’s Black Future Month, one of a series of initiatives in the Group held during the year to recognise and promote opportunities available to the diverse communities of talent across the Group. The data and views of employees gathered from the employee engagement surveys and other engagement mechanisms, together with feedback from the roundtable meetings held by Mrs Vittal, and Ms Isaacs-Lowe, help to ensure the Board is aware of the views and concerns of the workforce so that these are taken into account in the Board’s discussions and decision-making processes. More details of the meetings held by Mrs Vittal and Ms Isaacs-Lowe can be found on page 75.
In September, the Committee received a presentation on the Group’s talent management strategies and how these supported the Group’s growth ambitions and were key to the future success of the businesses. The Committee focused on the core pillars of the approach, namely: strengthening succession pipelines; developing diverse future leaders; and improving talent mobility.
During the year, the Committee considered the work being done to further develop Compass’ approach to mitigating the risks of modern slavery in the Group’s businesses and supply chains. Notable matters reviewed included:
The Committee reviews the Group’s Human Rights Policy every year to ensure that it remains fit for purpose and is aligned to the Group’s people, purpose and performance strategy. In 2023, the Committee considered proposed changes to the policy to improve its alignment with stakeholder feedback and expectations, as well as reinforcing the Group’s commitments to respecting human rights and its broader ESG ambitions. The Committee considered and subsequently recommended the revised Human Rights Policy to the Board for approval, which the Board approved.
The Committee also considered the Company’s Modern Slavery Act (MSA) statement for 2022 and concluded that the MSA statement reflected the progress made in the year and met the requirements of section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015. The Committee recommended the MSA statement to the Board for approval, and the Board approved the statement. Copies of Compass’ 2022 Modern Slavery Act statement and the Company’s Human Rights Policy are available on our website, www.compass-group.com. The 2023 MSA will be published on our website in December 2023.
During the year, the Committee considered the Group’s stakeholder engagement activities with clients, consumers, suppliers, communities and NGOs, including key areas of focus, noting that sustainability was a common theme among stakeholder groups. In addition to the areas of focus, the Committee reviewed the purpose and methods of engagement with stakeholders. Information on the approach to stakeholder engagement, including how the Board is appraised of the views of the Company’s stakeholders, and how the matters set out in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 have been considered in Board discussions and decision making, is set out on pages 74 to 81. Engagement with the Group’s employees is described on page 75 and in more detail in the People report on pages 36 and 37.
The priorities identified by the Committee following last year’s external evaluation process were:
These themes, together with the Committee’s regular programme of work, shaped the Committee’s agenda and were included in the principal activities during the year.
The outcome of this year’s internal evaluation of the Corporate Responsibility Committee confirmed that the Committee continued to function effectively. No specific areas were identified that required significant improvement.However, recognising the increasing importance of ESG to stakeholders, it was agreed that in the coming year, the Committee would continue to focus on ESG matters including, in particular:
These matters, together with the regular work of the Committee will inform the Committee’s agenda for the coming year.
Nelson Silva
Chair of the Corporate Responsibility Committee
20 November 2023
Corporate Responsibility Committee report continued
Ian Meakins was appointed Chair of the Committee in December 2020. Membership comprises the Chair of the Committee and all the non-executive directors. Biographies of Committee members can be found on pages 58 to 61. Members of the Committee are appointed by the Board. The Board considers each member of the Committee (except the Chair of the Board who was independent on appointment) to be independent in accordance with the criteria set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the Code). The Committee meets at least twice a year. The quorum for a meeting is three, of which the majority must be independent non-executive directors. The Committee held four meetings during the year. Meeting attendance can be found in the table on page 69. TheChair of the Board acts as Chair of the Committee, except when the Committee is dealing with the succession of the Chair of the Board. On these occasions, the meetings will usually be chaired by theSenior Independent Director (SID). The Chair of the Committee reports to theBoard on Committee activities and attends the AGM to respond toany shareholder questions that might be raised on the Committee’sactivities. Only members of the Committee have the right to attend meetings. Other individuals, such as the Group Chief Executive Officer (CEO), theGroup Chief People Officer (CPO) and external advisers may be invited to attend all or part of any meeting, as and when appropriate. The Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, who acts as secretary to the Committee, attends all meetings of the Committee. The Committee is authorised to seek external legal or independent professional advice as it sees fit. The terms of reference of the Nomination Committee are reviewed annually to ensure that they continue to be fit for purpose. They were last reviewed in September 2023. The review concluded that the terms of reference continue to be fit for purpose. A copy of the terms of reference can be found on our website, www.compass-group.com.
The Nomination Committee is responsible for ensuring the composition and structure of the Board remains effective, balanced and aligned to the Company’s strategic priorities. In practice, this involves overseeing the nomination, induction, evaluation and orderly succession of directors. The Committee also ensures the Group’s governance facilitates the appointment and development of a diverse pipeline of effective talent that can deliver shareholder value over the long term. Examples of the Committee’s activities during the year, are set out in the pages that follow.
Nomination Committee report
Ian Meakins
Chair of the Nomination Committee
Succession planning is a core element of the Committee’s work. When assessing succession plans for the Board, the Committee considers and evaluates the skills, knowledge and experience of its directors to ensure that the Board and its committees are well placed to discharge their duties, considering the need for diversity to reflect a broad range of backgrounds, experience and views. The tenure of independent non-executive directors is also reviewed regularly to facilitate future refreshing of the Board and to maintain an appropriate balance. From these reviews, the Committee determines the skills, experience, and attributes for new appointees to ensure the Board and its committees continue to operate effectively. During the year, the Committee reviewed Board succession plans over the medium to long term. During this assessment, it considered, the structure, size and composition of the Board taking into account the requirements of the Code, and the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Listing Rules. A new non-executive director, Leanne Wood, was appointed during the year, and more detail is provided on page 94.
Procedures for appointing new directors are set out in the Committee’s terms of reference. The appointment process is led by the Chair of the Board, except where the appointment is for their successor, when it is usually led by the SID. When appointing a new Chair of the Board, the process includes an assessment of the time commitment expected, recognising the need for the Chair of the Board to be available in the event of a crisis. Before an appointment of a director is made, the Nomination Committee agrees a candidate specification setting out the role and capabilities required. The Board promotes an environment which is supportive of individuals from diverse backgrounds, and in identifying suitable candidates, the Committee:
93Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Depending on the strategic and succession plans of the Company, where appropriate, the Company will expand its search to consider individuals who may not have direct PLC experience, but who have experience of leading complex, global-scale organisations. The Committee believes that this broad approach ensures the best possible chance of attracting a diverse pool of candidates. The Committee considers the selection and reappointment of directors carefully before making a recommendation to the Board. Non-executive directors and the Chair of the Board are generally appointed for an initial three-year term, which may be extended for a further two three-year terms. Reappointment is not automatic at the end of each term.
During the year, the Committee launched a recruitment process to facilitate the appointment of two additional non-executive directors in support of the Board’s succession plans and the Group’s strategic aims. The Committee was also mindful of the FCA’s Listing Rule LR9.8.6(9) (a)(i) which sets a target for listed companies of 40% female Boardmembership. The selection process was led by the Chair of the Board who was assisted by the Group CPO and Group General Counsel and Company Secretary. The Committee also used the services of an executive search firm to identify suitable candidates, Egon Zehnder (EZ). EZ is used from time to time by the Company for the recruitment of senior executives. It is independent of and has no other links with the Company or its directors. Position specifications were prepared by EZ in conjunction with the Committee setting out the desired attributes, experience and personal style for the successful candidates, which enabled EZ to formulate its search strategy. To ensure the best possible chance of attracting a diverse pool of candidates the search considered individuals who did not have direct PLC experience, but who possessed experience of leading complex, global-scale organisations. Potential candidates were also required to demonstrate that they had sufficient time available to devote to the role. In executing its search strategy for the two non-executive directors, and to ensure a diverse range of candidates, EZ identified a wide pool of potential candidates. From this, a long list was compiled and following further review, a number of individuals were profiled and considered by the Company. A short list was drawn up and seven candidates were interviewed by the Chair and CPO before progressing to the second selection stage of interviews with the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary and Group CEO. Candidates, who were considered to best match the role requirements, were put forward to meet with the SID and other members of the Board. After detailed discussions and careful consideration, the Nomination Committee concluded and recommended to the Board that LeanneWood be appointed to the Board with effect from 4 May 2023, which the Board approved. Leanne was considered to meet the brief very favourably. In addition to her people specialism, Leanne brings wider strategic and operational experience in global organisations and her people philosophy is a strong cultural fit with Compass. The Company also offered a role to a second female candidate who did not accept the position. The Company is continuing its search inthe coming year and hopes to meet all the FCA’s targets by the endof 2024.
In September 2023, Gary Green informed the Board that he wished to retire as Group Chief Operating Officer (COO), North America and as a director of Compass Group PLC and it was agreed that he would step down from the Board on 30 November 2023. Through the Board and Executive Committee succession planning processes, the Committee identified Palmer Brown as the preferred and natural candidate to succeed Gary Green given his extensive knowledge of the contract catering industry and his deep financial expertise which he had demonstrated over the last two years in the role of Group CFO. The Committee also recognised his prior experience with the US business which he joined in 2001 where he played a central role as a member of the executive team and had been responsible for many strategic acquisitions and disposals for the Group.The Committee recommended the appointment of PalmerBrown as the Group COO, North America and this was approved by the Board with effect from 1 December 2023. The Committee also considered candidates to succeed Palmer Brown as Group CFO. Again, through the Board and Executive Committee succession planning processes, the Committee identified PetrosParras as the preferred candidate. The Committee considered Mr Parras’ strong performance as Regional Finance Director for Europe and the Middle East where he had played a key role in the turnaround of the region, focusing on growth strategies, the operating model and core processes as well as the use of data analytics to drive better commercial outcomes. The Committee also considered his prior experience in fast-moving consumer goods businesses includingProcter & Gamble, Reckitt Benckiser and Coty in Europe and North America in senior finance, operational and strategic roles. The Committee recommended the appointment of Petros Parras as the Group CFO and a director of Compass Group PLC and this was approved by the Board with effect from 1 December 2023. Petros willstand for election at the 2024 AGM. Details of senior management succession planning are on page 95.
Induction process
On joining, new directors receive a formal, comprehensive and tailored induction programme designed to suit the individual’s needs and role. The induction includes meetings with senior management, the external auditor and external advisers, together with technical briefings and site visits, which facilitate an effective introduction totheGroup’s businesses and culture. The induction process is structured in a way that ensures the new director has a strong foundation and the necessary information to understand the business,and to be effective in the role. Since her appointment, Leanne Wood has completed her personalised induction and is contributing effectively to Board and committee discussions. Leanne will stand for election at the 2024 AGM.
Non-executive directors’ tenures and change in roles and responsibilities
Ian Meakins was appointed to the Board in September 2020 and as its Chair in December 2020. He completed his first three-year term in office during the year. In determining whether to renew Ian’s appointment for a further three-years, the Committee, chaired by the SID, considered the balance of perspectives, skills, experience and expertise needed on the Board to help the Company achieve its strategic goals. In arriving at a decision, the Committee considered Ian’s performance to date, his personal leadership qualities and the skills required to be a successful board chair, combined with the necessary experience, knowledge and insight to lead the Board in thenext stage of the Group’s development. Ian’s capacity to devote sufficient time to his role at Compass was also considered. The Committee duly recommended the reappointment of Ian Meakins as a non-executive director and Chair of the Board for a further term of three-years, which was approved by the Board.
Nomination Committee report continued
94
Governance
Carol Arrowsmith was appointed to the Board and as Chair of the Remuneration Committee in June 2014. She stepped down as Chair of the Remuneration Committee at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM and was succeeded in this role by John Bryant. To facilitate an orderly transition of the Remuneration Committee Chair, the Committee recommended that Carol continue as a member of the Remuneration Committee, which was approved by the Board. Carol completed her nine-year tenure in June 2023 and will retire from the Board following the conclusion of the 2024 AGM. The Board also approved the Committee’s recommendation that John Bryant, whom the Committee considered to be the most suitable candidate, be appointed to succeed Carol Arrowsmith as Chair of the Remuneration Committee at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM. John Bryant joined the board of Flutter Entertainment plc in February 2023 and became its Chair in September 2023. Recognising the time commitment required for this new role and his existing commitments, it was agreed by mutual consent that John would stand down as SID in July 2023 but continue as Chair of the Remuneration Committee and as a member of the Audit, Corporate Responsibility and NominationCommittees. The Board approved the Committee’s recommendation that Anne-Françoise Nesmes, who joined Compass in July 2018, succeed John as SID on the basis that she possessed the required level of seniority and experience to assume this senior Board position including a strong record of working within listed company boards together with an excellent knowledge of the associated UK regulatory and governance framework.
During the year, the Corporate Responsibility Committee was updated on the work of the DNED and their role in bringing the voice of employees into the boardroom. Ireena Vittal has been DNED since 2019. During her time in this role, Ireena has met with numerous employees from across the Group, listening to their insights and views and reporting them back to the Board. Ireena’s approach and personal style have ensured that employees have had the confidence to freely express any concerns and aspirations for Compass and their own development. The sessions have consistently been rated positively by participants and have provided the Board with a better understanding of the employee experience and have helped with the development of the Group’s People strategy. Ireena’s first term as DNED for a period of two years ended on 30 September 2021. She was subsequently reappointed as DNED for a second term which concluded on 30 September 2023. Atits meeting in September, the Committee recommended to the Board that Ireena’s term as DNED be extended until the end of her tenure as a director, which the Board approved. This will enable Ireena to further build on the trust and goodwill that has been established to date and to continue to bring the voice of employees into the boardroom. Details of this year’s engagement sessions are onpage 75.
Senior management succession planning
The Committee oversees the development of a strong and diverse pipeline of high-calibre individuals capable of discharging executive- level responsibilities. The succession planning process includes a review of talent at senior level. This enables the Committee to monitor and evaluate the strength of the talent pipeline, its composition, its diversity and the training and development needs within the Group’s senior leadership. During the year, the Committee focused on succession planningforthe Group’s North America business and the GroupExecutive Committee. At its meeting in November 2022, the Committee reviewed the succession plans for the North America business with the Group COO, Group CPO and the CPO for North America. The Committee focused on the talent pipelines and plans in place relating to executive functional and operational roles, and senior leadership roles in each business sector, which were designed to ensure business continuity and to support sustainable growth. The Committee received an update from the CPO North America on the approach to recruiting, developing and retaining talent, together with an update on DE&I initiatives designed to ensure that there are diverse talent pipelines in place reflecting the diversity of the consumers and communities served by the North America business. In connection with the Executive Committee succession plan, the Committee arranged for non-executive directors to have one-to-one meetings with some of the potential executive succession candidates. The meetings provided participating Committee members, particularlythose who had recently joined Compass, with an opportunity to get to know succession candidates and to assess the Group’s executive succession plan and its alignment to the Group’s strategic and DE&I ambitions. In September, the Committee reviewed the succession plans for theExecutive Committee with the Group CEO and Group CPO. TheCommittee reviewed the talent pipeline and focused particularly on the individuals identified as near-term succession candidates and their development plans.
Diversity, equity and inclusion
Board diversity and inclusion
At Board level, the approach to appointing new directors reflects the Committee’s objective to ensure there is always an appropriate balance of experience and backgrounds on the Board. Great emphasis is placed on ensuring that Board membership embodies diversity in its broadest sense. For this reason, members of the Board are drawn from a wide range of disciplines, industries and cultures. The Board Diversity Policy, is available on our website, www.compass-group.com. As reported on page 65, the FCA’s Listing Rules now set board diversity targets that at least 40% of the board are women, at least one of the roles of CEO, CFO, Chair and SID is held by a woman, and at least one director is from a minority ethnic background. The Company has met all of the above targets, except the target to have 40% of Board membership represented by women. Following the appointment of Leanne Wood in May, 38% of the Board members are women, versus 33% last year. The Committee is aware that the percentage will return to 33% when Carol Arrowsmith steps down from the Board at the conclusion of the forthcoming AGM in February 2024, and will endeavour to redress the balance to enable the Company to comply with this requirement by the end of 2024.
Group diversity, equity and inclusion
The Committee also reviews the Group’s policy on workforce DE&I, and its objectives and links to strategy. During the year, the Committee received an update on the Group’s DE&I activities from the Group CPO and the Group Talent and Capability Director.## Governance
The Remuneration Committee has engaged extensively with shareholders over recent years, and since my appointment as Chair I have continued this open and transparent dialogue. My priority has been to develop relationships with investors and to spend time listening. I have met with many of our major shareholders to understand their views on our Remuneration Policy and its implementation, and I have directly heard a variety of opinions. This dialogue has been a continuation of the extensive engagement carried out by my predecessor, Carol Arrowsmith, during 2021 and 2022, in respect of the 2022 Policy and other key remuneration decisions.
Although we were pleased that the majority of shareholders were supportive of the resolution to approve the 2022 DRR at the 2023 AGM, we are mindful that a notable minority opposed the resolution. During our engagement with shareholders in the lead-up to the 2023 AGM, it was apparent that there was some concern related to the increase in the Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) opportunity approved by shareholders at the 2022 AGM as part of the 2022 Policy and its subsequent implementation. However, concerns were not uniform across all major shareholders. For example, the largest single vote against the 2022 Policy at the 2022 AGM, and against the adoption of the Remuneration Report at the 2023 AGM, was influenced by a view that the incentive opportunity was not high enough. The prior votes against the remuneration resolutions should not therefore be interpreted as shareholders being universally opposed to the increased LTIP quantum, and in this context, because of this divergence of views amongst shareholders, building unanimous support across the register has been challenging.
During our extensive consultation on the 2022 Policy, we engaged with our 100 largest shareholders, representing almost 90% of the issued share capital. In the lead-up to the 2022 AGM vote, we had good insight and understanding into the views of the vast majority of our shareholders. Although views were mixed, it was clear that the majority of shareholders were supportive of the increased LTIP quantum for executive directors. The Committee was, and remains, strongly of the view that the proposals were in the long-term interests of the Company and of its shareholders. We therefore decided to proceed with implementation following shareholder approval of the 2022 Policy at the 2022 AGM.
The dialogue with investors continued after the AGM during the spring of 2022, and in the lead-up to the 2023 AGM. During engagement with investors following the 2023 AGM, many shareholders expressed the importance of the Committee’s commitment to not look at executive pay in isolation and to consider broader stakeholders in its deliberations. This approach is entirely aligned with that of Compass, and I was pleased to be able to share with some shareholders Compass’ broader approach to pay, which is set out on pages 105 to 106.
Dear Shareholder
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present our Directors’ Remuneration Report (DRR) for the year ended 30 September 2023, my first report as Chair of the Remuneration Committee. I joined the Compass PLC Board in September 2018 and was appointed Chair of the Remuneration Committee at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM. I would like to thank my predecessor, Carol Arrowsmith, for her leadership and stewardship of the Committee over the past nine years.
Compass is a business with over 550,000 employees operating in around 35 countries and around two-thirds of our revenues are generated in North America. 2023 was an exceptional year for Compass, establishing record levels of performance. The Group’s recovery surpassed its pre-pandemic levels of revenue, profit and cash. Our share price reached its highest level to date reflecting the market’s confidence in Compass and its leadership team.
The workstreams being undertaken across the Group to recruit, develop and retain a diverse talent pool were considered, including the strategy to support the ambition of creating lifetime opportunities and a workforce representative of the consumers and communities served by Compass. The Committee noted progress being made to increase gender diversity, and the structured and broad approach and actions being taken, which varied based on geography and culture.
95
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The Committee supports the initiatives taking place across the Group’s businesses to improve DE&I, including work to further strengthen the pipeline of women through managed career paths, improved access to opportunities and the removal of barriers to progression. More details on the Group’s DE&I initiatives can be found on pages 32 to 37. Information on Board and Executive Committee gender and ethnicity can be found on page 65. Gender diversity of Executive Committee direct reports can be found on page 36.
In line with its terms of reference, the Committee performed an annual review of the time required from the Chair of the Board, SID and non-executive directors to perform their duties. As part of this process, the Committee reflected on directors’ attendance at meetings and their availability at other times during the year. In consultation with the Chair of the Board, the Committee also considered the training that had been received by directors in the year, including the training session led by the Sustainability team, the external advisers and the Company’s external auditor on the wider ESG landscape, together with regulatory and governance updates from the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary and other in-house and external subject matter experts and advisers. Future training needs are regularly considered and addressed as required.
Last year, an independent external evaluation was conducted. Lintstock, which is independent of and has no other links with the Company or its directors, was selected to conduct the evaluation and the following priorities were identified for the financial year ended 2023, which the Board has addressed during the year:
This year, an internal evaluation was conducted with support from Lintstock. In May, based on a clear and comprehensive brief by the Chair of the Board and the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, questionnaires were prepared and distributed by Lintstock which focused on the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. The questionnaires, which took into account and built on the key themes which had emerged from the previous external evaluation, were completed by Board members.
Members of the Executive Committee completed a separate questionnaire which sought their views on Board dynamics across five themes: exposure to the Board, relationships and communications, support and challenge, supporting growth, and suggestions for improving Board and Executive Committee dynamics.
The outcome of the evaluation process (except the performance evaluation of the Chair of the Board, which was reviewed by the SID) was initially shared with the Chair of the Board and the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary followed by the other directors. All reports were subsequently presented to the Committee at its meeting in July. The evaluation concluded that the Board and its committees continued to be effective and that each of the directors continued to contribute effectively to Board and Committee meetings.
As a result of the evaluation, a number of priorities were agreed for the Board in the year ahead:
These priorities, together with the regular work of the Board, will inform the Board’s agenda for the coming year. The priorities identified from this year’s evaluation of the Audit, Corporate Responsibility and Remuneration Committees can be found on pages 88, 92 and 126 respectively.
The priorities identified by the Committee following last year’s external evaluation process were:
These themes, together with the Committee’s regular programme of work, shaped the Committee’s agenda and were included in the principal activities during the year under review.
This year’s internal evaluation of the Nomination Committee confirmed that the Committee continued to be effective and identified the following priorities for the year ahead:
These matters, together with the regular work of the Committee will inform the Committee’s agenda for the coming year.
Ian Meakins
Chair of the Nomination Committee
20 November 2023
Nomination Committee report continued
96
Governance# Remuneration Committee report
These results have been achieved against a backdrop of continued economic and political uncertainty. Results this year have been strong in all areas, with revenues reaching £31 billion, underlying operating profit growth of 30% on a constant-currency basis, underlying operating margin of 6.8%, net new business wins of 4.6% and a strong client retention rate of 96.5%. An ongoing focus on the importance of health and safety, including ethical sourcing, allergen management and food traceability, has continued to create opportunities for us. We remain committed to halving our food waste by 2030 and have made excellent progress this year in the rollout of the tracking technology to achieve this, with just under 8,000 sites globally now tracking food waste. Early trends in our food waste reduction are promising. However, the external landscape in which the Group operates continues to be challenging across our markets, with inflationary pressures being experienced in all markets and sectors. We reviewed our portfolio and have exited several countries as we continue to reshape our portfolio to focus on better growth opportunities in our larger, more developed markets. Nevertheless, the strength of our balance sheet, along with our confidence in the prospects for the business, have provided us with the platform for strong returns to shareholders. We have declared a total dividend for the year of 43.1 pence. We also provided additional capital returns through the year in the form of share buybacks. It is within this context that the implementation of the 2022 Remuneration Policy (the 2022 Policy) during the year should be considered.
I was also interested to hear views on our incentive arrangements and the continued development of performance criteria for our plans. I have committed that as part of the next policy review the Committee will consider the measures linked to our incentive plans and consult further with shareholders regarding our proposals. More recently, I also engaged with major shareholders to provide an update on the remuneration impact of the Board changes announced in September 2023. More details on our extensive engagement can be found on pages 103 to 104. The perspectives of our major shareholders form an important part of the Committee’s deliberations, and I would like to reiterate my commitment to engaging with and listening to shareholders, particularly as we consider our 2025 Remuneration Policy, a process that has already begun as a result of this engagement. The Committee appreciates the willingness of our major shareholders to take a meaningful part in our deliberations. We acknowledge that executive pay is a topic that attracts strong and often differing opinions amongst investors, and we have continued to adopt an approach which is measured, fair, and promotes the sustainable delivery of the Company’s long-term strategy.
Our people are at the heart of who we are and of what we do. We are focused on building an open culture in which our people can thrive, feel safe and feel valued for who they are and what they bring to Compass. In considering executive director remuneration, the Committee has regard to the wider workforce and is updated regularly on the remuneration policies and practices applicable to employees across the Group. My fellow Remuneration Committee member, Ireena Vittal, is the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement. During the year, Ireena continued her programme of engagement with employees to understand their views and experiences of working at Compass and what could be improved, and to take feedback on our approach to remuneration. These sessions provided Ireena with opportunities to hear directly from employees in an open environment, enabling the Board to better understand the differing views of our people. More information on Ireena’s discussions with employees can be found on page 75.
Earlier this year, as part of the UK & Ireland business’ Social Promise, it published its first ethnicity pay gap report, together with its gender pay gap report. The median gender pay gap reduced from 16.6% to 12.6%, which is lower than the UK national average. Median pay for ethnic minorities was 7.9% higher than the Compass UK&I average, reflecting a higher representation of ethnic minority colleagues in higher paid roles. However, there is more work to do and action plans have been defined and communicated to address the challenges. Our UK business is a Living Wage Recognised Service Provider, accredited by the Living Wage Foundation, meaning that its directly employed workforce are paid the Real Living Wage or above. Additionally, we continue to advocate for the Living Wage across our industry – encouraging clients and suppliers to pay the Living Wage. Within our regions, we have continued to provide support and assistance in respect of employees’ health and financial wellbeing. For example, employees in some countries across the Group benefit from access to same-day pay, salary advances and financial education and support. Access to these benefits is particularly valued by employees who would ordinarily not have access to mainstream financial products and associated financial wellbeing support. UK employees also have an opportunity to become shareholders of Compass through an employee share scheme. More details of our approach to responsible pay are set out on page 105 to 106.
As a Committee, we believe our remuneration framework continues to incentivise the successful execution of our strategy and the delivery of returns to our shareholders. Compass has performed well against the market, the FTSE 100 Index and our sector consistently over the short, medium and long-term, save for the period in which the Company’s operations were impacted significantly by the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout this period we have managed to retain a stable and high-performing management team. We continue to take a balanced and thoughtful approach to executive remuneration which is strongly aligned with UK corporate governance guidelines. We are acutely aware of the prevailing sensitivities surrounding executive remuneration arrangements and in recent years we have been particularly mindful of both protecting our front line employees and of shareholder views with regard to the potential exercise of positive discretion in respect of our long-term incentive plans. We are mindful that the base salary and total target remuneration of the Group CEO is in the lower quartile of the FTSE 30 (excluding financial services), and the Committee will review this positioning as part of our next Remuneration Policy review. The pension cash allowances received by executive directors are in line with the maximum available to the majority of the wider UK workforce. Whilst long-term incentive awards granted in the financial years ended 2018, 2019 and 2020 lapsed following the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the pay structure has incentivised a strong recovery following the pandemic and has rewarded exceptional Company performance over the past financial year.
The exceptional financial results and operational performance noted above are reflected in bonus outcomes for the year. When determining the outcome for the annual bonus plan, in addition to the formulaic outcomes the Committee considered the business performance and operating environment and the wider stakeholder experience. One-third of the bonuses earned for each executive director will be deferred into shares for a period of three years. The remainder of the bonus will be paid in cash. The cash payment and deferred bonus shares will be subject to malus and clawback provisions for a period of three years after payment/grant. No discretion has been exercised in respect of bonus payments for 2023. Full details of the targets and outcomes are set out on pages 116 to 117.
The 2020-2021 LTIP award was based on a three-year performance period ended 30 September 2023. Measures under this award were 40% on Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), 40% on Adjusted Free Cash Flow (AFCF) and 20% on Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR). Prior to grant, the Committee scaled back the award level by 30% of salary for the Group CEO and 25% of salary for other executive directors to reflect the fall in share price experienced as a consequence of the COVID-19 restrictions. The targets for this award were set in a highly uncertain environment and prior to the development and rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. The extent to which the businesses would have the ability to reopen and to generate revenue was highly dependent upon prevailing and future government actions. In particular, cash flow forecasting in the first year of the performance period was particularly challenging. Although actual performance over the three-year period has outperformed these target ranges, our performance has far exceeded any reasonable forecast from when the targets were originally set. The business delivered ROCE of 17.44% and AFCF of £2,890m over the three-year performance period ending 2023. Compass’ TSR performance was strong during the performance period, ranking 10th place out of the 73 companies in the comparator group, reflecting upper-quartile performance.
All three of the performance conditions under the 2020-2021 award were met, and the award will vest in full. The Committee considered it important to undertake a comprehensive and holistic review of performance, both on an absolute and relative basis, to determine whether the payout level was consistent with the performance achieved and, in so doing, to apply a level of judgement to the vesting decision beyond the formulaic outcome.Given the strength of delivery, degree of outperformance versus peers, top-quartile TSR performance, and the progress made on multiple strategic priorities, the Committee is satisfied that the vesting of the award fairly reflects performance over the period. Despite the Company’s strong performance during the preceding three years, this is the first LTIP award to vest over the four-year period of recovery and growth.
On 22 September 2023, we announced that Gary Green will step down from the Board on 30 November 2023. With effect from 1 December 2023, Palmer Brown will assume the role of Group Chief Operating Officer (COO), North America and Petros Parras will be appointed as Group Chief Financial Officer (CFO). In setting the remuneration packages for the new incumbents, we took a measured approach and set pay at a level which is both fair and competitive, taking into account the size and scope of the roles, the external talent market and the views of our major shareholders.
Base salaries for both Palmer Brown and Petros Parras have been set below the levels for the previous incumbent. Palmer Brown has been appointed on a base salary of $1,400,000, (c.14% below the salary level for the previous incumbent) and Petros Parras has been appointed on a base salary of £740,000 (around the lower quartile of the FTSE 30 (excluding financial services) and c.10% below the previous incumbent). All other elements of their packages, including incentive maxima (bonus – 150% of salary, LTIP – 350% of salary) are consistent with the 2022 Policy. Pension benefits for both directors have been set at 6% of salary which is consistent with the maximum rate available to the majority of the wider UK workforce.
It is recognised that the Group COO, North America role is perhaps unique amongst FTSE peers. When considering the salary for this role, the Committee was particularly cognisant of the following factors:
* the size and scale of our North American operations, which represent approximately two-thirds of the Group’s operations
* the ‘hot’ market for talent in our sector, particularly amongst US peers against whom we compete for talent. This is a US-based role and Palmer, a US citizen, will be returning to the US to undertake the role
* the skills and experience of Palmer, who joined the business 22 years ago and who will provide continuity via his extensive experience of both functional and operational roles in the Group
The Committee has set remuneration at a level which is below pay levels seen in many US organisations. While there is a material increase in base salary compared to his previous role, this reflects the very significant expansion in the role scope. The Committee will review the structure of remuneration in this context during the next Remuneration Policy review.
The Committee has deliberately set the base salary for Petros Parras, the incoming Group CFO, at a prudent level. In line with best practice, the Committee intends to keep his salary under review as he builds experience in the role.
Gary Green will step down from the Board on 30 November 2023 and will remain an employee and available to the Group until his retirement on 31 March 2024. His departure terms are consistent with the 2022 Policy. In recognition of his exceptional performance and contribution to the organistion, Gary will be treated as a good leaver for incentive plan purposes. Outstanding incentives will remain subject to performance and will be pro-rated for time. Full details of Gary’s remuneration arrangements for his departure are outlined in the annual report on remuneration on page 123.
The Committee is aware of the ongoing inflationary pressures and the impact that this continues to have on our people and their families. When deciding the salary increase for the Group CEO, the Committee considered the budget for salary increases for the wider workforce. Focus has remained on addressing the remuneration of our lowest paid employees and we are engaging with several external bodies to advocate for progress in this area, including advocacy with clients for the payment of a real living wage.
The Committee determined that the base salary level for the Group CEO effective 1 January 2024 would be £1,160,000, representing a 5.9% increase. This is below the average increase for employees across the wider UK population which is expected to be around 8% during 2024. Although the Committee does not look at benchmarking data mechanistically, we are mindful of the positioning of the current package for our Group CEO, which is around 20% below the market median of our FTSE 30 peers (excluding financial services) notwithstanding his experience and track record of success.
The Committee approved the return of a profit growth measure within the 2024 annual bonus plan for the Group CEO and Group CFO, following the Group’s return to profitable growth. This will replace the existing operating margin and revenue growth measures introduced during the COVID-19 period.
To reflect the progress made in rolling out our food waste tracking technology to almost 8,000 sites in 2023, the food waste measure will evolve to measuring frequency of usage in 2024. It is envisaged that this approach will result in better ingredient usage, reducing food costs and Scope 3 GHG emissions.
In order to maintain the momentum on margin progression, the operating margin measure will remain in the plan for the Group COO, North America for this year. The bonus structure for the Group COO, North America remains broadly the same as 2023, however with the 5% Group operating margin element absorbed into the regional operating margin element, increasing the weighting on regional operating margin to 45%.
The Committee intends to grant LTIP awards at 400% of salary for the Group CEO and 350% of salary for other executive directors. During our extensive engagement with major shareholders this year, this quantum was supported and considered to be appropriate, taking into account the record performance achieved this year, the relatively modest market positioning of pay in a hot global talent market, and our continued commitment to ensuring that stretching targets are set and incentive outcomes are supported by the underlying performance of the Group.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank our major shareholders, key institutional investor bodies, shareholder proxy agencies and other stakeholders for the time taken to engage with us during the year. We welcome your feedback on all aspects of our approach to executive pay and I look forward to speaking with you further in the year ahead, as we formally embark on our 2025 Remuneration Policy review. I hope that you will join the Board in supporting the resolution to approve the 2023 Directors’ Remuneration report at the upcoming AGM. I remain available for any shareholders who wish to discuss any of the content set out in this Report ahead of the AGM.
John Bryant
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
20 November 2023
99
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Governance
John Bryant succeeded Carol Arrowsmith as Chair of the Remuneration Committee at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM. Membership of the Committee comprises the Chair of the Committee and all the independent non-executive directors. Members are appointed by the Board following recommendation by the Nomination Committee. Biographies of Committee members can be found on pages 59 to 61.
The Committee meets at least twice a year. The quorum necessary for a meeting is two. The Committee held four meetings during the year. The meeting attendance table can be found on page 69. The Chair of the Committee attends the AGM to respond to any shareholder questions that might be raised on the Committee’s activities. Only members of the Committee have the right to attend its meetings. The Group General Counsel and Company Secretary acts as Secretary to the Committee and attends all its meetings. The Group Chief People Officer and the Group Reward Director are invited to attend meetings to advise on remuneration matters. The Chair of the Board, Group CEO and Group CFO may also attend by invitation. No individual attends meetings where their own remuneration is discussed or in circumstances where their attendance would not be appropriate.
Details of the advisers to the Committee can be found on page 126. The Committee seeks external legal or independent professional advice as it sees fit. The terms of reference of the Committee are reviewed annually and were last reviewed in September 2023 when minor changes were made. The terms of reference can be found on our website, www.compass-group.com.
The Committee determines the Company’s Remuneration Policy and is responsible for setting remuneration terms and conditions of employment for the Chair of the Board, executive directors and the Executive Committee. The Committee ensures that members of the Executive Committee are appropriately incentivised to drive the Group’s performance and are rewarded for their contribution to the long-term sustainable success of the business by designing, monitoring and assessing incentive arrangements, including setting stretching targets and assessing performance and outcomes. The Committee reviews remuneration arrangements for other senior executives within the Group and has regard to the remuneration philosophy of the organisation when developing policy and considering executives’ packages, monitoring the relationship between executive remuneration arrangements and those of the wider workforce. The Committee maintains an active dialogue with major shareholders and ensures their views and those of the proxy advisers are sought and considered when determining Remuneration Policy.# Directors' Remuneration Report
This DRR has been prepared on behalf of the Board by the Committee in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act, The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013, The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 and The Companies (Directors’ Remuneration Policy and Directors’ Remuneration Report) Regulations 2019. The sections include:
– the Committee’s key activities in the year, performance outcomes, and our engagement with shareholders, followed by an ‘at a glance’ summary of the remuneration decisions made during the year
– the 2022 Remuneration Policy effective 3 February 2022
– how the Policy was implemented during 2023 and how it will be implemented in 2024 (the Annual Remuneration report)
Auditable disclosures are the:
– executive directors’ single total figure of remuneration (page 115)
– non-executive directors’ remuneration (page 119)
– long-term incentive awards (page 121)
– extant equity incentive awards held by executive directors (page 122)
– directors’ interests (page 123)
– director changes during the year (page 123)
The key activities of the Committee during 2023 are set out below. The Committee also monitors performance and regularly reviews discretionary matters relating to individuals below executive director level in connection with the Company’s share plans. The Committee also agrees the terms of appointment and exit for executive directors and other members of the Executive Committee. The Committee held four meetings during the year, details of which are set out below:
November 2022
May 2023
August 2023
September 2023
| Governance | 15% |
|---|---|
| Linking pay to performance | 45% |
| Remuneration outcomes in respect of 2023 | 20% |
| Remuneration at a glance | 20% |
| Bonus | LTIP | Organic revenue growth | Operating efficiencies | Competitive advantage | Shareholder returns | Organic revenue growth | Operating margin | Workplace safety incident frequency rates | Relative TSR | Cash conversion | Food safety incident rates | Return on capital employed | Food waste | Adjusted free cash flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% for the Group CEO, Group CFO and Group COO, North America | 2020-2021 LTIP award | 2022-2023 single total figure of remuneration | 2022-2023 annual bonus plan | 2023 performance highlights | 40% | 40% | 20% | 100% for the Group CEO and Group COO, North America |
The 2020-2021 LTIP award granted to Palmer Brown pre-dates his appointment as an executive director.
| Name | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | £3,299k | £7,494k |
| Palmer Brown | £2,191k | £2,271k |
| Gary Green | £3,338k | £7,333k |
The performance graph shows the Company’s TSR performance against the performance of the FTSE 100 over the 10-year period to 30 September 2023. The FTSE 100 Index has been chosen as a broad equity market index of which the Company has been a constituent member throughout the period.
Remuneration KPIs Compass FTSE100
------------------------------------------
0 0 100
100 200 300 400
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
The below table sets out a summary of our Remuneration Policy for executive and non-executive directors, as approved by shareholders at the 2022 AGM, as well as its proposed implementation for 2024.
| Element and summary of policy | Implementation for 2024 # Remuneration in the wider context
Engagement with shareholders on the 2023 DRR
The majority of shareholders, and two of the most prominent voting advisory bodies, were supportive of the 2023 DRR. A minority of shareholders were influenced by another influential voting advisory body that was opposed to the resolution, with concerns primarily relating to the Policy approved at the 2022 AGM. Notably, not all the shareholder dissent was against the increase in LTIP quantum; indeed, the largest single vote against the Remuneration Policy in 2022, and against the Remuneration Report in 2023, was partly influenced by a view that the incentive opportunities were not high enough.
Engagement has repeatedly demonstrated that there are mixed views across our shareholder base, and the basis for voting differs across the register. In this context, building unanimous support has remained challenging.
Following the AGM in 2023, we continued our engagement throughout the year, writing to our 100 largest shareholders and requesting to meet with our largest 30 shareholders, representing almost two-thirds of the share register. Meetings took place with five shareholders representing 20% of issued share capital, and the three main proxy advisers. During this engagement exercise, we were pleased to note that shareholders are largely supportive of our approach to executive remuneration. Shareholders have welcomed the progression of environmental, social and governance (ESG) targets (food safety, workplace safety and food waste) within our short-term incentive plan. Shareholders were also pleased with the Committee’s decision not to exercise positive discretion in respect of the vesting of three consecutive LTIP awards, which all lapsed in full over 2020 to 2022 inclusive, and that they were given the opportunity to contribute to the Committee’s deliberations on this matter. We have also received feedback on the performance measures within both our short and long-term incentive plans and have committed to reviewing these during 2024 as part of our 2025 Remuneration Policy review.
Discussions on broader employee practices
Discussions with shareholders have not been limited to executive pay. We have listened to shareholder requests to better understand our practices more broadly in respect of employees in the Group and have held detailed conversations on our approach. This has included the pledge of our UK & Ireland business to address and to disclose pay gaps, e.g. the UK gender pay gap is below the UK national average and the UK ethnicity pay gap is negative, i.e. reflecting a higher representation of ethnic minorities working in locations and roles which are higher paid. We have also discussed our UK business’ accreditation as a Real Living Wage Service Provider and, more generally, its advocacy to clients and prospective clients for payment of the Real Living Wage. We have also discussed how we have been proactive in providing additional support to employees, and to those in the communities in which we operate. We provide significant support to employees, promoting mental health and wellbeing, providing financial education and support as well as free food in many locations. We are pleased that our approach aligns with best practice shareholder guidelines and evolving shareholder views. We also committed to broadening our disclosure in these areas in our 2023 Remuneration Report which is set out on pages 105 to 106. As noted in the Committee Chair’s statement, we are committed to a constructive dialogue with shareholders and the input provided continues to influence the decisions taken by the Committee. We will continue to invest time in understanding the differing viewpoints before making executive pay decisions.
Development of the 2022 Remuneration Policy
The Policy approved by shareholders in 2022 included an increase to long-term incentive award levels. While such increases need to be approached with caution, the Committee was mindful of the commercial challenges and the need to safeguard long-term shareholder interests. In developing the Remuneration Policy, the Committee consulted extensively with our largest shareholders prior to the 2022 AGM. The feedback received helped the Committee to shape its final proposals. In advance of the 2022 AGM, the Committee had a clear understanding that, while the approach had the support of the majority of our investors, there was a minority who were unsupportive of the proposed changes at that time and that this would be reflected in the voting outcome at the AGM. After careful consideration of all feedback, the Remuneration Committee concluded that the proposed approach was in the long-term interests of the Company and of its shareholders. The Committee therefore adopted and subsequently implemented the Remuneration Policy approved by shareholders at the 2022 AGM.
Since that time, we have maintained dialogue with major shareholders on executive pay, particularly with those who did not support the Remuneration Policy, with further engagement in the spring of 2022, and in early 2023, including a comprehensive engagement exercise in advance of the 2023 AGM, when it was apparent that investor sentiment remained mixed.
| Event | Date | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement post 2023 AGM: Letter sent to top 100 shareholders representing almost 90% of our share register to introduce the new Remuneration Committee Chair. Offer of a meeting to top 30 shareholders, representing almost two-thirds of our ISC. | February 2023 | |
| Engagement in lead-up to 2023 AGM: Calls with top 100 shareholders representing almost 90% of our ISC. | January 2023 | |
| Engagement post 2023 AGM: Meetings held with five major shareholders representing c.20% of our ISC, plus three main proxy advisers. Shareholder feedback shared with Remuneration Committee at its September meeting. | March to September 2023 | |
| Engagement with shareholders on the implementation of our Remuneration Policy: Letter sent to top 100 shareholders to summarise the key decisions taken by the Committee in the year. Follow-up calls with shareholders to explain our proposed approach. | November 2022 to January 2023 | |
| New Remuneration Committee Chair appointed | October 2023 | |
| Engagement on Board changes: Letter sent to top 30 shareholders setting out the remuneration arrangements for Palmer Brown and Petros Parras, the retirement terms for Gary Green and a broader remuneration update. | March 2022 | |
| Engagement post 2022 AGM: Letter sent to 25 shareholders representing around half of our ISC offering further engagement. | January to February 2022 | |
| Engagement in the lead-up to 2022 AGM: Calls with over 100 shareholders representing over 90% of our ISC. | May 2021 | |
| Engagement with shareholders in respect of the impact of COVID-19 on our incentive arrangements: Engaged with top 20 shareholders representing almost 50% of our Issued Share Capital (ISC). | July 2021 | |
| Engagement with shareholders as we developed our 2022 Remuneration Policy: Engaged with c.30 major shareholders representing over 60% of our ISC, outlining our proposed approach. | September and October 2021 | |
| Engagement with shareholders as we developed our Remuneration Policy: Second round of engagement on our proposals with our top 40 shareholders representing c.70% of our ISC. Follow-up calls with shareholders requesting a meeting. |
We will be engaging with our shareholders again in the lead up to the 2024 AGM and over the course of 2024 and 2025 as we begin to review our Remuneration Policy in advance of its approval at the 2025 AGM.
Our people are at the heart of our business and we want our employees to thrive in a fair and inclusive work environment. Understanding their needs and motivations helps to provide a great place to work and to drive business performance. Engagement with our employees takes many forms, including surveys, roundtables, townhall meetings, Speak Up, We’re Listening reports, and initiatives in conjunction with trade unions and other employee consultative bodies. Our Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, Ireena Vittal, also holds regular roundtable discussions with employees from around the Group, gathering colleagues’ views and sharing feedback with the Board. Pages 74 to 79 provide an overview of how we engaged with employees and other stakeholders in 2023. Details of the roundtable sessions are set out on page 75.
When considering executive remuneration and setting the Remuneration Policy, the Committee takes into consideration the wider workforce. A detailed employee landscape dashboard was presented to the Committee at its May 2023 meeting. The dashboard covered the following areas:
Employee landscape dashboard
Inflationary pressures
Throughout the year, we continued to monitor the inflationary pressures faced by many employees in the Group and made tactical changes where appropriate to help mitigate the impact.## For example:
Compass Group UK&I is a Living Wage Recognised Service Provider, meaning all directly-employed staff are paid at least the Real Living Wage. They also offer a Living Wage option in every client bid that is made. The UK&I business has made real progress tackling low pay across the UK, with an extra 20,000 colleagues being paid the Real Living Wage or above since October 2021. During the year, Compass Group UK&I won the prestigious Living Wage Champion Award in the Recognised Service Provider Category at the Living Wage Foundation annual awards.
The Compass UK gender pay gap in 2022 reduced by a quarter from 16.6% to 12.6%, which is below the national average of 14.9%. In addition, the median bonus gap reduced from 29.4% to 7.1%. When addressing the gender pay gap, the UK&I business has two clear areas of focus: (i) to continue increasing female representation in leadership; and (ii) to increase pay for its lowest paid, including the part-time front line workforce which is predominantly made up of women. The Compass UK ethnicity pay gap was published for the first time in 2022, and our UK&I business started with a median ethnic minority pay gap of -7.9% reflecting a higher representation of ethnic minorities working in locations and roles which are higher paid. However, there is more work to do to increase representation of ethnic minorities at senior leadership and management levels, including targets to promote social and economic mobility.
The Committee reviews the CEO pay ratio and the reasons for any movement in the ratio each year. Further detail can be found on page 124.
This year the Committee has overseen an increase in the number of participants in our Long-term Incentive Plan and an increase in the maximum value of awards, in order to improve alignment with market practice. We have a consistent annual bonus plan across our leadership team, with outcomes in the 2023 financial year based on local, regional and Group performance. Further detail on our approach to remuneration below Board level is set out overleaf.
105Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
| Component | Executive directors | Below Board level # Remuneration Policy
The Committee considers the general pay and employment conditions of all employees within the Group and is sensitive to these, to prevailing market and economic conditions and to governance trends when assessing the level of salaries and remuneration packages of executive directors and other members of the Executive Committee. Executive directors have a greater proportion of their total remuneration package at risk than other employees; however, the structure and principles of incentives are broadly consistent. The wider employee population of the Group will receive remuneration that is considered to be appropriate in relation to their geographic location, level of responsibility and performance. The Company is committed to ongoing engagement and seeks major shareholder views in advance of proposing significant changes to its remuneration policies.
The Committee has considered the Remuneration Policy and practices in the context of the principles of the Code, as follows:
– the Committee endorses a transparent approach to pay, by engaging regularly with executives, shareholders and their representative bodies to explain the approach to executive pay and how it links to the Compass strategy. We are also committed to clear and transparent disclosure on all aspects of executive remuneration.
– the purpose, structure and strategic alignment of each element of pay has been clearly laid out in the Remuneration Policy. The incentive arrangements are well understood by both participants and shareholders. The Committee monitors the structure of both the annual bonus and long-term incentive plans to ensure they are easy to understand and avoid unnecessary complexity. Additionally, the Committee ensures there is sufficient flexibility to exercise discretion and override formulaic outcomes where necessary.
– the Committee ensures a careful balance between competitive pay and performance-driven incentives, to mitigate any risk of excessive rewards or encouraging the wrong type of behaviours. There is an appropriate blend offixed and variable pay elements, which, alongside the Committee’s ability to exercise overarching discretion on Compass’ performance within the year, allow for a holistic assessment of performance in the year. Additionally, there are robust measures in place to ensure alignment with long-term shareholder interests, including the post-vesting holding period, shareholding requirement, malus and clawback provisions and mandatory deferral of a proportion of bonus into shares.
– our Directors’ Remuneration Policy contains both target and maximum opportunity details for our incentives, with actual performance outcomes dependent upon performance achieved against the targets for the period. Additionally, potential remuneration opportunities under different performance scenarios are set out on page 112 of thisReport.
– executives are incentivised to achieve stretching, business-linked targets over annual and three-year performance periods, ensuring strong alignment with the business’ objectives and creation of long-term sustainable value for shareholders. The Committee assesses performance holistically at the end of each period, taking into account underlying business performance as well as the internal and external market context. The Committee may exercise discretion to ensure that payouts appropriately reflect the experience of the Group during the year.
– to ensure alignment across the organisation, executive director pension cash allowances are aligned to themaximum rate available to the majority of the wider UK workforce. Additionally, the health and safety of our employees, clients and consumers has alwaysbeen a top priority for Compass. We have progressively increased the weighting of our ESG measures within the bonus plan, from 5%to 15%. Our measures are meaningful to our business, reflecting the importance of health and safety, and the impact of reducing food waste on the environment.
The key components of executive directors’ remuneration for the 2022 Policy period are summarised below:
| Component and link to strategy | Operation of component # Governance
The LTIP described in the table on page 110 (known as The Compass Group PLC Long-term Incentive Plan 2018) is the primary form of equity incentive for executive directors.
All of the Company’s equity-based incentive plans incorporate the current Investment Association’s Principles of Remuneration (the Principles) on headroom which provide that overall dilution under all plans should not exceed 10% over a 10-year period in relation to the Company’s issued share capital (or reissue of treasury shares), with a further limitation of 5% in any 10-year period for executive plans. The Committee monitors the position regularly and prior to making an award ensures that the Company remains within these limits. Any awards which are required to be satisfied by market-purchased shares are excluded from such calculations.
On 30 September 2023, the Company held 70,170,859 treasury shares. During the 2023 financial year, 800,000 shares were purchased in the market by the trustees of The Compass Group PLC All Share Schemes Trust. 1,343,592 treasury shares and 448,686 market-purchased shares were used in the year to satisfy the Company’s obligations under the Group’s employee equity incentive schemes.
As at 30 September 2023, the Company’s headroom position, which remains within the current Principles, was as shown in the charts below:
| Headroom | LTIP | Discretionary options |
|---|---|---|
| 10% in 10 years Headroom | 9.03% | 0.96% |
| 5% in 10 years Headroom | 4.03% | 0.96% |
In order that their interests are linked with those of shareholders, directors are expected to build up and maintain a personal shareholding in the Company. Under the 2022 Policy the Group CEO and all other executive directors are required to build up and maintain a personal shareholding of 400% and 350% of base salary, respectively. The shareholding guideline may be achieved by executive directors retaining shares received as a result of participating in the Company’s share plans. The guidelines specifically exclude the need to make a personal investment should awards not vest.
The required level of executive shareholding is expected to be achieved within a five-year period commencing from the date of appointment or date of increase in shareholding requirement, whichever is the later. Directors’ shareholdings are reviewed annually by the Committee to ensure that directors are on course to achieve their guideline shareholding within the period required. However, if it becomes apparent to the Committee that the guidelines are unlikely to be met within the timeframe, then the Committee will discuss with the director a plan to ensure that they are met over an acceptable timeframe. The Committee reserves the right to make the granting of future LTIP awards to an executive director conditional upon reaching the appropriate threshold in the required timeframe.
For annual bonus awards for executive directors for periods commencing on or after 1 October 2022, a minimum of one-third of the annual bonus earned will be deferred into shares for three years. A post-employment shareholding requirement was implemented under the Share Ownership Guideline Policy for executive directors and applies to awards acquired after the effective date of the 2021 Policy (4 February 2021). The Policy requires executive directors to hold the lower of (i) their shareholding at the date of termination of employment; or (ii) shares equivalent to their share ownership guideline at that date, for a period of two years post employment.
Non-executive directors are required to build up and retain a personal shareholding equal to the value of their base fee over four years. Non-executive directors are generally expected to purchase shares equating to a minimum value of one-third of their net-of-tax fee each year until the guideline is met.
Details of the interests of directors in shares and equity incentives are set out on page 123, together with the extent to which each of the directors has complied with the share ownership guidelines as at 30 September 2023.
Headroom as at 30 September 2023
| Item | 10% in 10 years Headroom | 5% in 10 years Headroom |
|---|---|---|
| LTIP | 9.03% | 4.03% |
| Discretionary options | 0.96% | 0.96% |
| 0.01% | 0.01% |
The graphs below show an estimate of the remuneration that could be received by executive directors in office at the date of this DRR under the 2022 Policy. The charts illustrate for each executive director remuneration payable at minimum, target and maximum outcomes, along with maximum outcome incorporating an illustrative share price appreciation of 50% on shares granted under the LTIP. Each of the bars is broken down to show how the total under each scenario is made up of fixed elements of remuneration, the annual bonus, the LTIP, and LTIP including share price appreciation.
Dominic Blakemore, Group CEO
| Scenario | Total remuneration | Fixed pay | Annual bonus | LTIP | LTIP +50% share price growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | £4,583 | £1,189 | £7,759 | £9,949 | |
| Target | 26% | 24% | 50% | ||
| Maximum | 12% | 22% | 66% | ||
| Maximum +50% | 15% | 28% | 57% | ||
| share price growth |
Gary Green, Group COO, North America
| Scenario | Total remuneration | Fixed pay | Annual bonus | LTIP | LTIP +50% share price growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | £3,112 | £959 | £5,119 | £6,575 | |
| Target | 31% | 20% | 49% | ||
| Maximum | 19% | 24% | 57% | ||
| Maximum +50% | 15% | 19% | 66% | ||
| share price growth |
Palmer Brown, Group CFO
| Scenario | Total remuneration | Fixed pay | Annual bonus | LTIP | LTIP +50% share price growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | £4,932 | £1,487 | £8,145 | £10,475 | |
| Target | 30% | 25% | 57% | ||
| Maximum | 18% | 14% | 19% | ||
| Maximum +50% | 67% | 20% | 50% | ||
| share price growth |
The scenarios in the graphs are as follows:
– fixed pay includes:
– annual base salary as at 1 October 2023
– value of benefits as noted in the single figure table on page 115 for the Group CEO and Group COO, North America.# Governance
The Committee will apply the 2022 Policy when considering the recruitment of a new executive director in respect of base salary, pension and benefits, and short and long-term incentives. Executive directors will be provided with a pension cash allowance (or contribution) in line with the maximum level of pension provided to the majority of the wider UK workforce (currently 6% of base salary). It is envisaged that the maximum level of variable remuneration which may be granted to a new executive director would be within plan rules and consistent with the 2022 Policy maximum opportunity for existing executive directors and the Group CEO. Other arrangements may be established specifically to facilitate recruitment of a particular individual, albeit that any such arrangement would be made within the context of aiming to minimise the cost to the Company.
The policy for the recruitment of executive directors includes the facility to provide a level of compensation for forfeited remuneration arrangements from an existing employer if these are required in order to achieve a successful recruitment. Any arrangement established specifically to facilitate the recruitment of a particular individual would be intended to be of comparable form, timing and commercial value to the benefits forfeited, and capped as appropriate. The quantum, form and structure of any buyout arrangement will be determined by the Committee taking into account the terms of the previous arrangement being forfeited. The buyout may be structured as an award of cash or shares. However, the Committee will normally have a preference for replacement awards to be made in the form of shares, deliverable no earlier than the original awards.
Where an executive director is appointed from either within the Group or following corporate activity/reorganisation, the normal policy would be to honour any legacy incentive arrangements to run off in line with their original terms and conditions.
The historic policy on the payment of bonus on termination, which was in place prior to June 2008, was the provision of a payment, at par or target, of bonus in respect of the notice period, where the Company exercised its right to make a payment in lieu of notice. Gary Green’s service contract is based on this historic policy. When introducing the revised policy in June 2008 and after careful consideration, the Committee concluded that it was not in shareholders’ interests to migrate such contracts onto the amended policy.
Service contracts for Dominic Blakemore, Palmer Brown and Petros Parras fully comply with the policy in effect from June 2008. All executive directors’ service contracts impose a clear obligation to mitigate such payment should a departing executive director take on new employment or receive alternative remuneration.
Gary Green’s service contract was entered into before 27 June 2012, and it has not been renewed on or after that date. Consequently, remuneration payments or payments for loss of office that are required to be made under Gary Green’s contract are not required to be consistent with the current Policy. The Company may also pay for reasonable costs in relation to termination of employment, for example tax, legal and outplacement support, where appropriate.
Whilst unvested share awards will normally lapse, the Committee may in its absolute discretion allow for awards to continue until the normal vesting date, or for vesting to be accelerated (for example on death), subject to achievement of the attendant performance conditions. In such circumstances, awards vesting will normally be prorated on a time-apportioned basis, unless the Committee determines otherwise. Any such discretion in respect of leavers would only be applied by the Committee to ‘good leavers’ where it considers that continued participation is justified, for example by reference to performance prior to the date of leaving. The malus and clawback provisions would continue to apply in the event that any such discretion was exercised.
The executive directors in office at the date of this DRR have served on the Board for the periods shown below and have service agreements dated as follows:
| Executive director | Date of contract | Length of Board service as at 30 Sep 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | 12 Dec 2011 | 11 years, 7 months |
| Palmer Brown | 3 Oct 2021 | 2 years, 0 months |
| Gary Green | 29 Dec 2006 | 16 years, 9 months |
In cases where an executive director must be relocated from their home location as part of their appointment, additional benefits in kind and other allowances may be payable at the Committee’s discretion, including but not limited to relocation, education, repatriation costs, tax equalisation or other reasonable international assignment support normally consistent with the relevant policies applicable to the wider workforce.
It is the Board’s intention that the policy on the recruitment of new non-executive directors during the 2022 Policy period will apply remuneration elements consistent with those in place for the existing non-executive directors. It is not intended that cash supplements, day rates or benefits in kind be offered, although in exceptional circumstances such remuneration may be required in currently unforeseen circumstances. Non-executive directors are not eligible for pension scheme membership, bonus or incentive arrangements.
It is the Company’s policy that executive directors have rolling service contracts. The current executive directors’ service contracts contain the key terms shown in the table below:
| Service contract key terms by provision | Detailed terms Details of the appointments of non-executive directors (in office at the date of this DRR) which are terminable without compensation are set out in the table below, together with the dates on which their appointments have been formally revised.
| Non-executive director | Original date of appointment | Letter of engagement¹ | Total length of service as at 30 Sep 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carol Arrowsmith | 1 Jun 2014 | 14 May 2014, 8 Mar 2017, 19 Mar 2020, 9 May 2023 | 9 years, 4 months |
| Stefan Bomhard | 5 May 2016 | 5 May 2016, 13 Mar 2019, 17 Mar 2022 | 7 years, 4 months |
| John Bryant | 1 Sep 2018 | 17 May 2018, 12 May 2021 | 5 years, 1 month |
| Arlene Isaacs-Lowe | 1 Nov 2021 | 22 Oct 2021 | 1 year, 11 months |
| Ian Meakins | 1 Sep 2020 | 17 Aug 2020, 9 May 2023 | 3 years, 1 month |
| Anne-Françoise Nesmes | 1 Jul 2018 | 17 May 2018, 12 May 2021 | 5 years, 3 months |
| Sundar Raman | 1 Jan 2022 | 22 Oct 2021 | 1 year, 9 months |
| Nelson Silva | 16 Jul 2015 | 16 Jul 2015, 8 Mar 2018, 19 Mar 2021 | 8 years, 2 months |
| Ireena Vittal | 16 Jul 2015 | 16 Jul 2015, 8 Mar 2018, 19 Mar 2021 | 8 years, 2 months |
| Leanne Wood | 4 May 2023 | 4 May 2023 | 0 years, 5 months |
¹ Date of letter of engagement.
114 Governance
The table below sets out in a single figure the total amount of remuneration, including each element, received by each of the executive directors in office for the year ended 30 September 2023.
| Dominic Blakemore | Palmer Brown | Gary Green | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 £000 | 2022 £000 | 2023 £000 | |
| Fixed pay | |||
| Base salary | 1,083 | 1,034 | 821 |
| Taxable benefits¹ | 28 | 59 | 153 |
| Pension | 75 | 116 | 49 |
| Total fixed pay | 1,186 | 1,209 | 1,023 |
| Performance-related pay | |||
| Bonus² | 2,190 | 2,090 | 1,248 |
| LTIP³ | 4,118 | – | – |
| Total variable pay | 6,308 | 2,090 | 1,248 |
| Single total figure of remuneration | 7,494 | 3,299 | 2,271 |
The Committee reviewed base salaries in the context of the Group’s strong performance in the year, its relative market positioning when measured against companies of comparable size, scale and complexity and also took into account the average salary increase in the wider employee population. The base salary increase percentage for each executive director was lower than the average percentage increase for the wider UK population. The annual base salary for each executive director for the year ended 30 September 2023 is set out below:
| Director | Base salary | Effective date |
|---|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | £1,095,000 | 1 January 2023 |
| Palmer Brown | $1,016,500 | 1 January 2023 |
| Gary Green | $1,626,870 | 1 January 2023 |
At 30 September 2023, there were no executive directors actively participating in any Compass Group defined benefit pension arrangements and none of the executive directors were accruing additional entitlements to benefits under any arrangements that existed prior to their appointment as executive directors. Under the 2022 Policy, the allowance receivable by the executive directors was reduced on a phased basis and by 31 December 2022 aligned with the maximum rate available to the majority of the wider UK workforce, which is currently 6%. When Palmer Brown was appointed as Group CFO, he was appointed with a pension cash allowance of 6% of base salary. The pension cash allowance for Dominic Blakemore and Gary Green reduced as set out below, with the 31 December 2022 change representing the final reduction:
| Director | Pension cash allowance effective 1 Oct 2022 | Pension cash allowance effective 31 Dec 2022 | Average pension cash allowance received during the year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | 10% | 6% | 7.0% |
| Gary Green | 18% | 6% | 9.2% |
115 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The bonus targets and outcomes for the year ended 30 September 2023 are set out below. The achievement of targets is calculated on a straight-line basis between Minimum and Target (par) and between Target and Maximum, and by reference to budgeted exchange rates. As was the case in previous years, the measurement of the achievement of the financial results is based on the underlying outcome achieved in the financial year, with gains/losses attributable to currency movements, charges and the impacts of restructuring and/or acquisitions/disposals usually being excluded.
Structure
The bonus plan for 2022-2023 was designed to align the plan to the Group’s strategy for growth and to establish targets that were achievable, fair and within management’s control. The bonus structure for 2022-2023 is set out below:
| Category and weighting of category | Measure | Description of measure | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial measures (85%) | Operating margin | This is an important measure of the efficiency of the Group’s operations in delivering great food and support services to our clients and consumers. | 45% |
| Cash conversion | This demonstrates the Group’s ability to convert profit into cash. Regardless of absolute profit, it aims to ensure a certain conversion rate is achieved and incorporates key levers under management control. | 20% | |
| Organic revenue growth | This embodies the Group’s success in growing and retaining the Group’s customer base, as well as its ability to drive volumes in its existing business and maintain appropriate pricing levels that take into account input cost inflation. | 20% | |
| Environmental, social & governance (ESG) measures (15%) | Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate (LTIFR) | A reduction in lost time incidents is an important measure of the effectiveness of the Group’s safety culture. It also lowers rates of absenteeism and costs associated with work-related injuries and illnesses. | 5% |
| Food Safety Incident Rate (FSIR) | Food safety is a measure of the Group’s ability to provide food that is safe and of the right quality to its consumers globally. | 5% | |
| Food waste technology deployment | Food waste is a key contributor to carbon emissions. Reducing this also has a high correlation with operating margin improvement. Raising awareness through measurement will help to drive a significant reduction in food waste. | 5% | |
| Total | 100% |
¹ All measures are assessed at a Group level except for the bonus for Gary Green, where all measures (save for 5% of Group operating margin) are measured by reference to regional North America performance.
The outcomes against the annual bonus targets for 2023 are set out below. 0% of the bonus is paid at minimum performance, 50% at par performance, and 100% at maximum performance.
Dominic Blakemore and Palmer Brown
| Measures¹ | Weighting | Minimum | Par (target) | Maximum | Achieved | % of performance target achieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group operating margin² | 45% | 6.10% | 6.40% | 6.70% | 6.75% | 100% |
| Group organic revenue growth³ | 20% | 5.00% | 8.20% | 11.40% | 19.42% | 100% |
| Group cash conversion⁴ | 20% | 75.00% | 79.10% | 81.10% | 85.79% | 100% |
| Weighting Limit | Achieved | % of performance target achieved | ||||
| Group Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate | 5% | 2.60 | 1.98 | 100% | ||
| Group Food Safety Incident Rate | 5% | 0.20 | 0.15 | 100% | ||
| Weighting | Minimum | Par (target) | Maximum | Achieved | % of performance target achieved | |
| Group food waste (number of sites with technology deployed) | 5% | 5,600 | 5,800 | 6,000 | 7,943 | 100% |
| Total | 100% |
116 Governance
Gary Green
| Measures¹ | Weighting | Minimum | Par (target) | Maximum | Achieved | % of performance target achieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group operating margin² | 5% | 6.10% | 6.40% | 6.70% | 6.75% | 100% |
| North America operating margin² | 40% | 7.20% | 7.50% | 7.80% | 7.84% | 100% |
| North America organic revenue growth³ | 20% | 5.70% | 9.70% | 10.70% | 17.43% | 100% |
| North America cash conversion⁴ | 20% | 80.50% | 84.50% | 86.50% | 89.45% | 100% |
| Weighting Limit | Achieved | % of performance target achieved | ||||
| North America Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate | 5% | 4.17 | 2.78 | 100% | ||
| North America Food Safety Incident Rate | 5% | 0.08 | 0.05 | 100% | ||
| Weighting | Minimum | Par (target) | Maximum | Achieved | % of performance target achieved | |
| North America food waste (number of sites with technology deployed) | 5% | 2,850 | 2,950 | 3,050 | 3,280 | 100% |
| Total | 100% |
| Dominic Blakemore | Palmer Brown | Gary Green | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value of bonus⁵ | £2,190,000 | $1,524,750 | $2,440,305 |
Notes to bonus table:
Awards were made to Dominic Blakemore and Gary Green in December 2020 which were subject to the achievement of three-year performance targets for the year ended 30 September 2023. Performance conditions were ROCE, AFCF and Relative TSR, weighted 40%, 40% and 20% respectively. The definitions are set out in the table below:
| Measure | Definition of measure |
|---|---|
| ROCE | The definition aims to measure the underlying economic performance of the Group. ROCE is calculated at the end of the three-year performance period as net underlying operating profit after tax (NOPAT) divided by 12-month average capital employed. ROCE targets are updated at the end of the performance period to reflect actual acquisition spend, changes in accounting standards and constant currency. |
| AFCF | The definition aims to measure the cash generation of the Group and is calculated as the three-year cumulative underlying free cash flow adjusted for constant currency. |
| TSR | Performance is compared to that of constituent members of the FTSE 100 (excluding the financial services sector). TSR is the aggregate of share price growth and dividends paid (assuming reinvestment of those dividends in the Company’s shares during the three-year performance period). |
Shareholder experience over the three-year performance period has been extremely positive. The share price at the time of grant in December 2020 was £13.78. The average share price over the last three months of the performance period, upon which the TSR calculations are based, was £20.36. Compass ended the performance period ranked 10th of the 73 companies that remain within the comparator group. As this position is within the upper quartile of the comparator group, the proportion of shares subject to the TSR performance condition will vest in full. AFCF for the period was £2,890m and the business delivered ROCE of 17.44%. Our adjusted free cash flow performance over the three-year period exceeded our target ranges and has far exceeded any reasonable forecast when the targets were originally set. As a result of our strong performance over the three-year performance period, the 2020-2021 LTIP award will vest in full.
Prior to grant, the Committee scaled back the award levels by 30% of salary for Dominic Blakemore and 25% of salary for Gary Green and the former Group CFO, Karen Witts, to take into account the fall in the share price as a consequence of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business.
In undertaking the review of outcomes of the incentive awards to ensure they are supported by the underlying performance of the Company, the Committee noted that both the annual incentive outcome and the vesting level of the LTIP reflected the Group’s strong recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, with revenue surpassing its pre-COVID level this year, underlying operating profit exceeding £2 billion and the share price reaching an all-time high of £22.50 during 2023. The Committee decided not to exercise any positive discretion in respect of the previous three long-term incentive outcomes, although it was arguable that during the latter two years, the success of the business recovery and the growth trajectory could have justified a modest level of vesting.
Historically, the Committee has taken a disciplined approach and continues to take a robust view in respect of the awards vesting in 2023. In addition to the formulaic outcome, the Committee considered the level of vesting on both an absolute and relative basis, including conducting a detailed review of performance against its principal competitors at multiple points within the performance period. The Committee has reviewed the performance through a number of different lenses and on that basis, following a thorough evaluation, the Committee is satisfied that the performance levels achieved justify the vesting level.
The targets and outcomes for the 2020-2021 LTIP award are set out below:
ROCE (40% weighting)
| Level of performance | Threshold | Maximum | Achieved | Vesting % of component |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 100% | 100% | ||
| As at date of award | 12.56% | 13.56% | ||
| Reconciled at the end of the performance period 1 | 12.67% | 13.67% | 17.44% |
AFCF (40% weighting)
| Level of performance | Threshold | Maximum | Achieved | Vesting % of component |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 100% | 100% | ||
| AFCF | £1,215m | £1,485m | £2,890m |
Relative TSR (20% weighting)
| Level of performance | Threshold | Median | Upper quartile | Achieved | Vesting % of component |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 25% | 100% | 100% |
Details of awards held for each executive director are set out below:
| Performance conditions | Director | ROCE % vested on maturity | AFCF % vested on maturity | TSR % vested on maturity | Number of shares awarded | Number of shares vested | Number of dividend equivalent shares | Value of shares on vesting £000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Dominic Blakemore | 100% | 100% | 100% | 195,907 | 195,907 | 6,378 | £4,118 | |
| Gary Green | 100% | 100% | 100% | 181,939 | 181,939 | 5,923 | £3,825 |
On 1 December 2022, executive directors received a conditional award of shares which may vest after a three-year performance period which will end on 30 September 2025, based on the achievement of stretching performance conditions. Performance conditions were ROCE, AFCF and Relative TSR, weighted 40%, 40% and 20% respectively. Definitions of each of these measures are set out in the table on page 117.
The maximum levels achievable under these awards are set out in the table below:
| Director | Type of award | Value of award (as a % of base salary) 1 | Value of award £000 | Number of shares awarded 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | LTIP 2018 | 400% | 4,180 | 225,966 |
| Palmer Brown | LTIP 2018 | 350% | 2,830 3 | 152,979 |
| Gary Green | LTIP 2018 | 350% | 4,530 3 | 244,904 |
Executive directors are required to hold vested awards for a period of two years following vesting to strengthen the long-term alignment of executives’ remuneration packages with shareholders’ interests and, if required, to facilitate the implementation of provisions related to clawback. For awards granted after 4 February 2021 a two-year post-employment shareholding requirement also applies.
In setting the performance targets, the Committee considers internal budgets and the Group’s strategic plan, market expectations and general economic conditions. The targets under the 2022-2023 award are set out in the table below:
ROCE and AFCF
| Level of performance | Vesting % of each component | ROCE | AFCF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | 0% | 17.33% | £2,897m |
| Par (target) | 50% | 17.83% | £3,049m |
| Maximum | 100% | 18.33% | £3,201m |
TSR
| Level of performance | Vesting % of each component |
|---|---|
| Below median | 0% |
| Median | 25% |
| Upper quartile | 100% |
The fee for the Chair of the Board is reviewed annually by the Committee with any increase taking effect on 1 October. For the year ended 30 September 2023 the fee paid was £562,500 per annum inclusive of any Board committee memberships. Details of the amount received by Ian Meakins during the year ended 30 September 2023 is set out below:
| Chair | Fees £000 | Benefits £000 | Total 2023 £000 | Total 2022 £000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ian Meakins | 563 | – | 563 | 538 |
The fees for the non-executive directors are reviewed and determined by the Board each year to reflect appropriate market conditions. The base fee paid to non-executive directors for the year ended 30 September 2023 was £94,000 which includes membership of the Audit, Corporate Responsibility, Nomination and Remuneration Committees (as appropriate). An additional fee of £30,000 per annum is payable where a non-executive director acts as Chair of the Audit, Remuneration or Corporate Responsibility Committee and an additional fee of £30,000 per annum is also payable to the director nominated as Senior Independent Director.
Details of the amounts received by each of the non-executive directors in office for the year ended 30 September 2023 are set out below:
| Non-executive director | Fees £000 | Benefits 1 £000 | Total 2023 £000 | Total 2022 £000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carol Arrowsmith 2 | 105 | 12 | 117 | 120 |
| Stefan Bomhard | 94 | 3 | 97 | 91 |
| John Bryant 2,3 | 137 | 19 | 156 | 122 |
| Arlene Isaacs-Lowe 4 | 94 | 25 | 119 | 86 |
| Anne-Françoise Nesmes 3 | 130 | 2 | 132 | 120 |
| Sundar Raman 4 | 94 | 4 | 98 | 68 |
| Nelson Silva | 124 | 6 | 130 | 122 |
| Ireena Vittal | 94 | 13 | 107 | 90 |
| Leanne Wood 5 | 39 | – | 39 | – |
A summary of how the Directors’ Remuneration Policy will be applied during the 2024 financial year is set out below.
The Committee considered the salary review of the Group CEO holistically, taking into account the macroeconomic environment, cost of living and inflationary challenges faced by the business and our employees. The Committee also reviewed the base salary in the context of the Group’s strong performance in the year, along with our relative market positioning when measured against companies of appropriate size, scale and complexity. Salary increase budgets for the wider employee population were taken into consideration and the Committee determined that the percentage increase for the Group CEO would be lower than the average percentage increase for the wider UK population which is expected to be around 8% during 2024. Further information on the Committee’s considerations when setting the remuneration arrangements for base salary is set out in the Chair of the Committee’s letter on page 99.
The base salaries for the executive directors as determined by the Committee are set out in the table below:
| Director | Base salary | Effective date | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | £1,160,000 | 1 Jan 2024 | 5.9% |
| Petros Parras | £740,000 | 1 Dec 2023 | n/a |
| Palmer Brown | $1,400,000 | 1 Dec 2023 | n/a |
In line with the Remuneration Policy, the pension cash allowance for each executive director is aligned with the maximum rate available to the majority of the wider UK workforce (currently 6% of base salary).
119
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
For the 2024 financial year, the maximum bonus opportunity for each executive director will be in line with the 2022 Policy, as shown in the table below:
| Director | % salary |
|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | 200% |
| Petros Parras | 150% |
| Palmer Brown | 150% |
To reflect the Group’s return to profitable growth, the 2024 annual bonus plan will consist of a profit growth measure for the Group CEO and Group CFO. This will replace the existing operating margin and revenue growth measures. To continue the momentum on margin progression, for the Group COO, North America, the operating margin measure will remain in the plan for 2024. The 2024 structure for the Group COO, North America remains broadly the same as 2023; however, the 5% Group operating margin element will be absorbed into the regional operating margin element, increasing the regional operating margin weighting to 45%.
In 2023, we introduced food waste as a new measure in the annual bonus plan, as part of the existing suite of ESG measures. Food is at the core of our business and one of the ways we can make a significant impact on climate change is by reducing food waste. The 2023 target was to deploy technology across a number of sites to formally measure food waste. To create an accurate baseline for measuring actual food waste and translating this into an appropriate target within the bonus plan, the measure will evolve from a technology deployment target in 2023 to measuring frequency of usage rates in 2024. It is envisaged that this approach will result in better ingredient usage, reducing food costs and Scope 3 GHG emissions. It is our intention to move towards a food waste reduction target in 2025.
We will continue to incentivise improvement in our core health and safety measures within the annual bonus plan. For 2024, it is intended that we will move from measuring lost time incidents to total recordable injuries which is considered a more holistic measure that takes into account all workplace risks. It is recognised that there may be initial instability during the introductory year and therefore the Committee will monitor performance against both measurement criteria and take a holistic view of this component of ESG performance at the end of the performance period.
The measures and weightings will be as follows:
| Measure | Description of measure | Weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Profit growth (%) | A key measure of our financial performance encompassing revenue and margin performance in one metric, by comparing the underlying operating profit delivered in the current year with that of the prior year, expressed as a percentage and adjusted for exchange rate movements. | 60% |
| Cash conversion (%) | Demonstrates the Group’s ability to convert profit into cash – by setting a target percentage of profit to be converted to cash. | 25% |
| ESG | Emphasises the Group’s commitment to its health and safety culture, and the impact of reducing food waste on climate change. | 15% |
| Total | 100% |
| Measure | Description of measure | Weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin (%) | Demonstrates the efficiency of the region’s operations in delivering great food and support services. | 45% |
| Cash conversion (%) | Demonstrates the region’s ability to convert profit into cash – by setting a target percentage of profit to be converted to cash. | 20% |
| Organic revenue growth (%) | Compares the revenue delivered from continuing operations in the current year with that from the prior year, adjusting for the impact of acquisitions, disposals and exchange rate movements. | 20% |
| ESG | Emphasises the Group’s commitment to its health and safety culture, and the impact of reducing food waste on climate change. | 15% |
| Total | 100% |
The Committee has chosen not to disclose the details of the targets in this DRR, as in the opinion of the Committee they are commercially sensitive. However, the specific targets and the extent to which the targets have been met (at both Group and regional levels) will be disclosed in next year’s DRR.
Remuneration report continued
120
Governance
The Committee intends to grant LTIP awards to the executive directors during the 2024 financial year, with award levels in line with the 2022 Policy, as shown in the following table:
| Director | % salary |
|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | 400% |
| Petros Parras | 350% |
| Palmer Brown | 350% |
The extent to which these LTIP awards will vest will be dependent on performance assessed over the three financial years 2024-2026, using the following three performance measures, and with targets as shown in the table below.
| Measure | Description of measure | Weighting (% of award) | Threshold | Par (target) | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE | The definition aims to measure the underlying economic performance of the Group. ROCE is calculated at the end of the three-year performance period as net underlying operating profit after tax (NOPAT) divided by 12-month average capital employed. ROCE targets are updated at the end of the performance period to reflect actual acquisition spend, changes in accounting standards and constant currency. | 40% | 18.47% | 19.07% | 19.67% |
| Vesting (of this component) | 0% | 50% | 100% | ||
| AFCF | The definition aims to measure the cash generation of the Group and is calculated as the three-year cumulative underlying free cash flow adjusted for constant currency. | 40% | $4,355m | $4,633m | $4,911m |
| Vesting (of this component) | 0% | 50% | 100% | ||
| Relative TSR | Relative TSR performance is compared to that of constituent members of the FTSE 100 (excluding the financial services sector). TSR is the aggregate of share price growth and dividends paid (assuming reinvestment of those dividends in the Company’s shares during the three-year performance period). | 20% | Median | – | Upper quartile |
| Vesting (of this component) | 25% | – | 100% |
There is no vesting for below-threshold performance, and straight-line vesting between the points shown.
In line with the 2022 Policy, executive directors are required to hold vested awards for a period of two years following vesting to strengthen the long-term alignment of executives’ remuneration packages with shareholders’ interests; and, if required, to facilitate the implementation of provisions related to clawback. For awards granted after 4 February 2021 a two-year post-employment shareholding requirement applies.
The fees for non-executive directors for the coming year are set out below. Following a review of the market, the fee for the Chair was increased from £562,500 to £595,900 (5.9%) with effect from 1 October 2023. The base fee for non-executive directors was increased from £94,000 to £99,575 (5.9%) also with effect from 1 October 2023. The additional fees for acting as Chair of a committee or as the Senior Independent Director remain unchanged.# Remuneration report
| Fees 2023 £ | Fees 2022 £ | Increase |
|---|---|---|
| Chair 595,900 | 562,500 | 5.9% |
| Base fee 1 | 99,575 | 94,000 |
| Chair of Audit, Remuneration or Corporate Responsibility Committee | 30,000 | 30,000 |
| Senior Independent Director | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Details of all existing equity incentive awards as at the date of this DRR, including the awards conditionally made under the various long-term incentive plans to the executive directors at any time during the year ended 30 September 2023, are shown in the table below:
| Director | As at 30 Sep 2022: number of shares | Awarded during the year: number of shares | Released during the year: number of shares | Lapsed during the year: number of shares | As at 30 Sep 2023: number of shares | Market price at date of award 4 : £ | Date of award | Maturity date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Blakemore | 152,700 | – | – | 152,700 | 3 | 19.16 | 27 Nov 2019 | 3 1 Oct 2022 |
| 195,907 | – | – | – | 195,907 | 13.78 | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Oct 2023 | |
| 241,385 | – | – | – | 241,385 | 17.60 | 8 Feb 2022 | 1 Oct 2024 | |
| – | 225,966 | – | – | 225,966 | 18.67 | 1 Dec 2022 | 1 Oct 2025 | |
| Total | 589,992 | 225,966 | – | 152,700 | 663,258 | |||
| Palmer Brown 2 | 145,040 | – | – | – | 145,040 | 17.60 | 8 Feb 2022 | 1 Oct 2024 |
| – | 152,979 | – | – | 152,979 | 18.67 | 1 Dec 2022 | 1 Oct 2025 | |
| Total | 145,040 | 152,979 | – | – | 298,019 | |||
| Gary Green | 146,385 | – | – | 146,385 | 3 | 19.16 | 27 Nov 2019 | 3 1 Oct 2022 |
| 181,939 | – | – | – | 181,939 | 13.78 | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Oct 2023 | |
| 232,195 | – | – | – | 232,195 | 17.60 | 8 Feb 2022 | 1 Oct 2024 | |
| – | 244,904 | – | – | 244,904 | 18.67 | 1 Dec 2022 | 1 Oct 2025 | |
| Total | 560,519 | 244,904 | – | 146,385 | 659,038 |
| Director | As at 30 Sep 2022: number of shares | Awarded during the year: number of shares | Released during the year: number of shares | Lapsed during the year: number of shares | As at 30 Sep 2023: number of shares | Market price at date of award 4 : £ | Date of award | Maturity date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmer Brown 2 | 20,243 | – | – | – | 20,243 | 15.08 | 15 Dec 2021 | 15 Dec 2024 |
| Total | 20,243 | – | – | – | 20,243 |
In order that their interests are aligned with those of shareholders, directors are expected to build up and maintain a personal shareholding in the Company as set out in the share ownership guidelines described in the 2022 Policy on page 111. Executive directors are required to achieve their shareholding guideline within a five-year period commencing on the date of appointment or date of increase in shareholding requirement, whichever is the later. The guideline for executive directors increased on 3 February 2022. Compliance with the guideline is assessed annually, on a pro-rata basis. Non-executive directors are required to achieve their shareholding guideline within a four-year period from the date of appointment.
The Committee reviewed and noted that the guidelines were satisfied by all directors in office during the year. The interests of the directors in office during 2023 in shares (including the interests of persons closely associated) and share incentives are shown in the table below:
| Beneficial Shares held as at 30 Sep 2023 | Beneficial Shares held as at 30 Sep 2022 | LTIP holdings as at 30 Sep 2023 | LTIP holdings as at 30 Sep 2022 | Share ownership guideline 1 | Compliance with share ownership guidelines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive directors | ||||||
| Dominic Blakemore | 276,789 | 276,789 | 663,258 | 589,992 | 400% | |
| Palmer Brown 2 | 43,265 | 19,906 | 298,019 | 266,219 | 350% | |
| Gary Green 3 | 275,560 | 275,560 | 659,038 | 560,519 | 350% | |
| Non-executive directors | ||||||
| Carol Arrowsmith | 12,000 | 13,083 | – | – | 100% | |
| Stefan Bomhard | 10,743 | 10,743 | – | – | 100% | |
| John Bryant | 15,781 | 15,781 | – | – | 100% | |
| Arlene Isaacs-Lowe | 2,500 | 2,500 | – | – | 100% | |
| Ian Meakins | 58,362 | 58,362 | – | – | 100% | |
| Anne-Françoise Nesmes | 11,907 | 11,907 | – | – | 100% | |
| Sundar Raman | 5,030 | 5,030 | – | – | 100% | |
| Nelson Silva | 10,323 | 10,323 | – | – | 100% | |
| Ireena Vittal | 5,461 | 5,461 | – | – | 100% | |
| Leanne Wood | 1,477 | – | – | – | 100% | |
There were no changes in directors’ interests between 30 September 2023 and 20 November 2023.
On the recommendation of the Nomination Committee the following changes were made to directors’ roles and responsibilities during the year:
Gary Green will retire as a director of Compass Group PLC on 30 November 2023 but remains an employee on his existing terms of employment until 31 March 2024 (the Retirement Date) in order to facilitate an orderly handover. Gary is not entitled to any severance payment, notice pay or payment for loss of office. Gary is entitled to an annual bonus for the 2023 financial year. Details of this bonus payment are set out on page 117, with one-third delivered as a deferred bonus share award. Gary will participate in the 2023-2024 annual bonus plan for the period from 1 October 2023 to the Retirement Date, with his bonus being determined at the normal time and in the normal way, but with the entitlement pro-rated to that date. Details of the performance targets and bonus outcome will be set out in the 2024 DRR. In order to comply with certain US tax rules, any bonus payment made to Gary following the Retirement Date will be paid entirely in cash without deferral into shares. For the same reason, in accordance with the rules of the plan, Gary’s existing deferred share awards will also vest and be settled at the Retirement Date. Gary will continue to be subject to the clawback provisions that apply in respect of deferred bonus. Gary’s unvested share awards under the LTIP will be preserved in accordance with the good leaver provisions in the plan rules, and will vest at the normal time subject to satisfaction of the performance conditions and a time pro-rating adjustment to reflect the proportion of the applicable performance period that has passed at the time of the Retirement Date. Information relating to the vesting of shares under the LTIP will be included in the relevant DRR. The holding periods that apply to Gary’s vested share awards under the LTIP will continue to apply. Gary is subject to a post-employment shareholding requirement which requires him to retain shares that vest under his 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 LTIP awards for two years from his Retirement Date and to certain post termination restrictive covenants for a period of 18 months from the Retirement Date.
There were no payments for loss of office during the year.
There were no payments to former directors during the year.
Executive directors may accept one non-executive directorship in a FTSE 100 company or other significant appointment outside the Company, subject to the Board’s approval and provided that such an appointment is not likely to lead to a conflict of interest. It is recognised that non- executive duties can broaden experience and knowledge which can benefit the Company.Dominic Blakemore received fees of £128,750 in respect of his directorship at London Stock Exchange Group plc for the 2023 financial year. At the date of this DRR, Palmer Brown and Gary Green do not hold any paid external appointments.
The Committee believes that the Policy provides a clear alignment with the strategic objectives and performance of the Group. To maintain this relationship, the Committee regularly reviews the business priorities of the Group and the environment in which it operates. The table below shows the Group CEO’s total remuneration and achievement against the annual bonus plan and long-term incentive plans over the last 10 years, as a percentage of the plan maximum.
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single total figure of remuneration (£000) | 6,298 | 5,325 | 5,822 | 5,617 | 4,568 | 4,659 | 1,162 | 3,211 | 3,299 | 7,494 |
| Annual bonus plan outcome (% of maximum opportunity) | 87.3 | 88.7 | 85.8 | 68.9 | 95.9 | 78.3 | 0 | 99.9 | 100 | 100 |
| LTIP outcome (% of maximum opportunity) | 100 | 79.0 | 84.5 | 74.5 | 95.0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
The ratio between the Group CEO’s remuneration and the lower quartile, median and upper quartile of UK employees is disclosed in the table below. Figures include the Group CEO’s total remuneration as set out in the single figure table on page 115, and the remuneration paid to employees at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, over the past four financial years.
A has been chosen to calculate the ratio, as it is considered the most accurate approach. This method includes total full-time equivalent remuneration for UK employees received by an individual in respect of the relevant financial year and is calculated in line with the methodology for the single figure of remuneration for the Group CEO. The best equivalents for the three UK employees whose hourly rates of pay were at the 25th, median and 75th percentiles were selected, with a small number of employees around each quartile reviewed, to ensure that the employees chosen at the three percentile points were, within reason, representative of the pay of the UK workforce at each quartile. The Committee has considered the pay data of the three employees identified and believes that it fairly reflects pay at the relevant quartiles amongst the UK workforce. The three individuals identified did not receive any remuneration which would otherwise inflate their pay figures.
Executive remuneration, in line with market practice, includes a significant proportion subject to performance and therefore ‘at risk’. As a result, remuneration of the Group CEO is weighted more heavily towards variable pay than that of the wider workforce. The ratio will therefore fluctuate each year depending on the performance of the Company. During the financial years 2020, 2021 and 2022, remuneration was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic which had a significant impact on variable pay elements. The financial year 2023 included the first LTIP vesting for executive directors in three years, following the Committee electing not to exercise positive discretion despite its strong recovery over the three years. The increase in the Group CEO’s remuneration and associated pay ratio reflects the Group’s exceptional performance in 2023, where record levels of performance have been achieved in many areas. The ratio has therefore increased, which reflects the correlation between pay and performance. We believe that the median pay ratio is consistent with the pay, reward and progression policies for the Company’s UK employees taken as a whole.
| Year and component | Method | 25th percentile pay ratio | Median pay ratio | 75th percentile pay ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 total remuneration | A | 323:1 | 303:1 | 236:1 |
| 2022 total remuneration | A | 159:1 | 129:1 | 115:1 |
| 2021 total remuneration | A | 172:1 | 138:1 | 125:1 |
| 2020 total remuneration | A | 63:1 | 54:1 | 42:1 |
The salary and total remuneration levels used in the pay ratio calculations are set out in the table below:
| Financial year | Component | Group CEO £000 | 25th percentile £000 | Median £000 | 75th percentile £000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Salary | £1,083 | £21 | £24 | £24 |
| Total remuneration | £7,494 | £23 | £25 | £32 | |
| 2022 | Salary | £1,034 | £18 | £22 | £26 |
| Total remuneration | £3,299 | £21 | £26 | £29 | |
| 2021 | Salary | £1,000 | £16 | £19 | £24 |
| Total remuneration | £3,211 | £19 | £23 | £26 | |
| 2020 | Salary | £894 | £17 | £21 | £26 |
| Total remuneration | £1,162 | £18 | £21 | £28 |
The following table shows the annual change in each individual director’s base salary/fees, benefits and bonuses, compared to the annual change in average UK employee pay for the year ended 30 September 2023. Figures have been annualised to show a like-for-like comparison.
| Change in pay between 2022 and 2023 | Change in pay between 2021 and 2022 | Change in pay between 2020 and 2021 | Change in pay between 2019 and 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base salary/fees % change¹ | Bonus % change² | Benefit % change³ | Base salary/fees % change¹ | |
| Executive directors | ||||
| Dominic Blakemore | 4.7% | 4.8% | (52.0)% | 3.4% |
| Palmer Brown | 4.4% | 4.8% | (30.3)% | N/A ⁴ |
| Gary Green | 4.7% | 4.8% | 6.6% | 3.6% |
| Non-executive directors | ||||
| Carol Arrowsmith | 5 | (12.6)% | – | 5,808.8% |
| Stefan Bomhard | 4.4% | – | 203.9% | 2.3% |
| John Bryant | 5 | 14.5% | – | 804.3% |
| Arlene Isaacs-Lowe | 4.4% | – | 651.0% | N/A ⁴ |
| Ian Meakins | 5 | 4.7% | – | N/A ⁴ |
| Anne-Françoise Nesmes | 5 | 8.3% | – | N/A ⁴ |
| Sundar Raman | 4.4% | – | N/A ⁴ | N/A ⁴ |
| Nelson Silva | 3.3% | – | 278.0% | 1.7% |
| Ireena Vittal | 4.4% | – | N/A ⁴ | 2.3% |
| Leanne Wood | 6 | N/A ⁴ | – | N/A ⁴ |
| Average pay of UK employees ⁷ | 11.5% | (23.4)% | (24.8)% | 3.8% |
The following table sets out the amounts paid in share buybacks, dividends and total employee costs for the 2022 and 2023 financial years.
| Disbursements | 2023 £m | 2022 £m | Change %¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share buybacks ² | 929 | 438 | 112.1% |
| Dividends paid ³ | 648 | 418 | 55.0% |
| Total employee costs ⁴ | 14,426 | 12,163 | 18.6% |
Shareholder vote at the 2022 and 2023 Annual General Meetings
The table below sets out the voting outcome at the AGM held on 9 February 2023 in respect of the 2022 Annual Remuneration Report resolution:
| Number of votes ‘For’ and ‘Discretionary’ | % of votes cast ‘For’ | Number of votes ‘Against’ | % of votes cast ‘Against’ | Total number of votes cast | Number of votes ‘Withheld’ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Annual Remuneration Report | 997,278,858 | 70.32 | 420,854,399 | 29.68 | 1,418,133,257 | 1,698,457 |
The table below sets out the voting outcome at the AGM held on 3 February 2022 for the Remuneration Policy which applies until February 2025:
| Number of votes ‘For’ and ‘Discretionary’ | % of votes cast ‘For’ | Number of votes ‘Against’ | % of votes cast ‘Against’ | Total number of votes cast | Number of votes ‘Withheld’ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Remuneration Policy | 973,341,831 | 67.50 | 468,571,337 | 32.50 | 1,441,913,168 | 34,029,557 |
The Committee welcomed the endorsement of the 2022 DRR and 2022 Policy by the majority of shareholders and took steps to understand the concerns of shareholders who withheld their support for the Policy, as described in detail on pages 103 to 104. At the 2024 AGM, shareholders will be invited to vote on the 2023 Annual Remuneration Report (advisory vote).
On behalf of the Board
John Bryant
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
20 November 2023
Remuneration of other senior executives and management
A number of senior executives and the executive directors comprise the Executive Committee. These key management roles influence the ability of the Group to meet its strategic targets. The Remuneration Committee sets the remuneration for these individuals and considers the remuneration levels and structure of the wider business. Total remuneration including base salary and other short-term benefits, bonus and the expected value of long-term incentives for this group is summarised in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements on page 157.
Remuneration advice
The Group Chief People Officer and the Group Reward Director are normally invited to attend each Committee meeting to advise on remuneration matters. The Chair of the Board, Group CEO and Group CFO may also attend from time to time by invitation. They are not paid a fee for attending the Committee in addition to their normal remuneration from the Company under their service contracts. None of the foregoing attend when their own remuneration is discussed. Details of the members of the Committee who served during the 2023 financial year are set out on pages 59 to 61.
The Committee appointed Deloitte LLP (Deloitte) as its independent remuneration adviser in September 2021. Deloitte’s fees during 2023 were £104,400 (2022: £40,750). Fees are charged on a time and materials basis and covered advice on executive remuneration, attendance at Committee meetings, general advice and updates on remuneration developments. Deloitte provided advice to the Group in relation to tax and accounting, technology and other consulting services during the year. Deloitte is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and complies with its Code of Conduct.
Alithos Limited (Alithos) was appointed by the Company in 2002. During the year, Alithos provided information for the testing of the TSR performance conditions for the Company’s LTIP awards, for which it received fixed fees of £24,000 (2022: £24,000). Alithos also provided other share price and TSR data to the Committee during the year for which it received fees of £500 (2022: £500). Alithos provided additional TSR analysis to the Company during the year for which it received a fee of £7,000 (2022: £2,000).
The Committee is satisfied that the advice it received during the year was objective and independent, based on the experience of its members.
Committee evaluation
The priorities set by the Committee in response to last year’s external evaluation process were:
– determining appropriate performance measures and targets, including ESG metrics
– considering the economic/geopolitical environment when assessing performance
These themes, together with the Committee’s regular programme of work, shaped the Committee’s agenda and were included in the principal activities during the year.
2023 evaluation
During the year, an internal evaluation of the effectiveness of the Committee was conducted as part of the wider evaluation of the Board and its committees. Details can be found on page 96. The evaluation concluded that the Committee continued to operate effectively and identified a number of priorities for 2024 which included focusing on target setting and stretch, ESG measures in incentives, and investor engagement. These matters, together with the regular work of the Committee, will inform the Committee’s agenda for the coming year.
Remuneration report continued
The directors present their Annual Report and the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for the financial year ended 30 September 2023. This Directors’ report forms part of the management report as required under the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR) 4. The Company has chosen, in accordance with Section 414C (11) of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), to include certain matters in its Strategic report that would otherwise be required to be disclosed in this Directors’ report. The Strategic report can be found on pages 1 to 55 and includes an indication of future likely developments in the Company, details of important events and the Company’s business model and strategy. The Corporate Governance report on pages 56 to 126, the Other statutory disclosures on pages 127 to 130 and the Directors’ responsibilities statement on page 131 are incorporated into the Directors’ report by reference.
Specifically, the following disclosures have been included elsewhere within the Annual Report and are incorporated into this Directors’ report by reference:
| Disclosure | Page |
|---|---|
| Financial risk management | 18 |
| Future developments in the business | 11 |
| Statement of directors’ responsibilities including disclosure of information to the auditor | 131 |
| Disclosure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions | 42 |
| TCFD disclosure | 45 |
| Shareholder information | 229 |
| Viability statement | 31 |
| Going concern statement | 21 |
In the year ended 30 September 2023, the Group delivered an underlying profit before tax of £1,986 million (2022: £1,490 million), an increase of 33%; and a statutory profit before tax of £1,747 million (2022: £1,469 million), an increase of 19%.
It is proposed that a final dividend of 28.1 pence per share be paid in respect of the financial year ended 30 September 2023 on 29 February 2024 to shareholders on the register on 19 January 2024. The final dividend of 28.1 pence per share will be paid gross and a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) will be available. The last date for receipt of elections for the DRIP will be 8 February 2024.
| Year | Dividend | Pence per share |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Final | 28.1 |
| 2023 | Interim | 15.0 |
| 2022 | Final | 22.1 |
| 2022 | Interim | 9.4 |
Generally, the trustee of the employee benefit trust, the Compass Group PLC All Share Schemes Trust (ASST), which operates in connection with the Company’s share plans, waives its right to receive dividends on any shares held by it. Details of the ASST can be found on page 128 of this Report. The value of the dividends payable during the year ended 30 September 2023 that were waived by the ASST was £88,042 (2022: £75,024). At the date of this Report, there were 76,528,069 11 1⁄20 pence ordinary shares held in treasury for the purpose of satisfying the Company’s obligations under its employee equity incentive schemes. Shares held in treasury are not entitled to receive dividends.
The Company has a single share class which is divided into ordinary shares of 11 1⁄20 pence each. At the date of this Report, 1,785,403,977 ordinary shares of 11 1⁄20 pence each (of which 76,528,069 are held in treasury) have been issued, are fully paid up and are quoted on the London Stock Exchange. Each share (excluding treasury shares) has one vote. The total voting rights attaching to the issued ordinary share capital (excluding treasury shares) at the date of this Report is 1,708,875,908.
In addition, the Company sponsors a Level I American Depositary Receipt programme with BNY Mellon, through which the Company’s shares are traded on the over-the-counter market in the form of American Depositary Shares.
During the year ended 30 September 2023, 192,660 options were exercised (equating to the release of 108,081 net settled shares) and 1,684,197 awards were released pursuant to the Company’s share option schemes, long-term incentive plans and other discretionary share schemes. All options exercised and awards released were satisfied, as appropriate, by the reissue of 1,343,592 treasury shares and the release of 448,686 shares from the ASST. No treasury shares have been reissued and no shares have been released by the ASST since the end of the financial year to the date of this Report to satisfy awards under these schemes.
There are no restrictions on the transfer of ordinary shares in the capital of the Company other than those restrictions which may from time to time be imposed by law. The Company is not aware of any agreements between shareholders that may result in restrictions on the transfer of securities and/or voting rights. The Company is not aware of any significant agreements to which it is party, that take effect, alter or terminate upon a change of control of the Company following a takeover. More detailed information relating to the rights and obligations attaching to the Company’s ordinary shares, and those conferred by law, are set out in the Company’s articles of association.# Articles of association
The Company’s articles of association were adopted by shareholders at the 2021 AGM, and may only be amended by special resolution at a general meeting of shareholders and are available on the Company’s website, www.compass-group.com.
As permitted by the articles, the Company obtained shareholder authority at the 2023 AGM to purchase its own shares up to a maximum of 175,720,000 ordinary shares. From 1 October 2022 until 11 November 2022, the Company bought back 3,447,549 ordinary shares related to a £500 million share buyback announced on 26 May 2022. On 21 November 2022, the Company announced consistent with its capital allocation framework a share buyback of up to £250 million to be completed in the first half of 2023. This successfully completed on 31 March 2023 when the Company had bought back 13,127,521 ordinary shares of 11 1⁄20 pence. On 10 May 2023, a further share buyback of up to £750 million to be completed by the end of the 2023 calendar year was announced. Subsequently on 12 May 2023, a share buyback of £250 million commenced and was successfully completed on 3 July 2023 when the Company had bought back 11,396,015 ordinary shares of 11 1⁄20 pence.
127Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
On 24 July 2023, it was announced that a further share buyback of up to £500 million would be carried out between 24 July and 14 November 2023. This completed on 14 November 2023 when the Company had bought back 24,698,077 ordinary shares of 11 1⁄20 pence. During the financial year ended 30 September 2023, the Company purchased in aggregate 46,311,952 ordinary shares of 11 1⁄20 pence and subsequently transferred these to treasury. The cost of the shares purchased during the financial year ended 30 September 2023 was £931 million excluding transaction costs. A further 6,357,210 shares have been repurchased between 1 October 2023 and the date of this Report at a cost of £130 million excluding transaction costs. As at the date of this Report there are 76,528,069 ordinary shares held in treasury (representing 4.5% of the issued ordinary shares) for the purpose of satisfying the Company’s obligations under employee equity incentive schemes. Shares held in treasury are not eligible to participate in dividends and do not carry any voting rights. Further details of treasury shares and the share buyback programme are set out on page 195.
At the 2024 AGM, a special resolution will be proposed to renew the directors’ limited authority (last granted at the 2023 AGM) to purchase the Company’s ordinary shares in the market.
At the 2024 AGM, the directors will ask shareholders to renew the authority last granted to them at the 2023 AGM to allot equity shares representing approximately one-third of the issued ordinary shares calculated at the latest practicable date prior to the publication of the Notice of AGM (the section 551 authority) and, in accordance with the Investment Association Share Capital Management Guidelines, the directors propose to extend this by a further one-third of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital, provided that such amount shall only be used in connection with a rights issue. If approved, the authority will expire no later than 15 months from the date the resolution is passed, or at the conclusion of the Company’s 2025 AGM, whichever is the sooner.
Changes in the Company’s share capital during 2023, including details of purchases and releases by the ASST, and the reissue of treasury shares during the year, together with details of options granted over unissued capital, are set out in notes 25 and 26 to the consolidated financial statements.
As at 30 September 2023, and up to the date of this Report, the following information has been received in accordance with DTR 5, from holders of notifiable interests in the Company’s issued share capital:
| % of Compass Group PLC’s voting rights | |
|---|---|
| Blackrock, Inc. | 9.99 |
| Artisan Partners Limited Partnership | 4.96 |
| Invesco Limited | 4.95 |
| Massachusetts Financial Services Company | 4.60 |
The information provided above was correct at the date of notification but may have changed since. However, the holder is not required to make another notification to the Company until the next notifiable threshold (as defined in DTR 5) is crossed.
The Compass Group Employee Share Trust (ESOP) was established on 13 January 1992 in connection with the Company’s share option plans. The Compass Group Long Term Incentive Plan Trust was established on 5 April 2001 in connection with the Company’s long-term incentive plans. In 2019, it was adapted to allow it to source shares for all the Company’s share schemes and renamed the Compass Group PLC All Share Schemes Trust. Details of employee equity incentive schemes are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration report on pages 97 to 126. As at 30 September 2023, the trustees of the ESOP and ASST held nil (2022: nil) and 573,223 (2022: 221,909) ordinary shares of the Company respectively.
Awards under employee share schemes
Details of awards made during the year and held by executive directors as at 30 September 2023 are disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration report on pages 97 to 126. Details of employee equity incentive schemes and grants made during the year ended 30 September 2023, and extant awards held by employees are disclosed in the consolidated financial statements on pages 197 and 198.
Compass places particular importance on engaging with employees, recognising that its people are vital in delivering the Group’s commitments and strategy and to living its values. Employee engagement is based on commitments to respect, teamwork and growth within the workforce. Senior leaders across the Group meet with their teams through roundtables, townhalls and site visits. Mobile apps are used to communicate directly with front line staff, and webcasts, blogs, newsletters, in-house publications and other communication channels are also deployed to share relevant information and invite comments and questions. These channels provide mechanisms to keep employees regularly informed on matters of concern to them as employees, and to promote a common awareness of the financial, economic and environmental factors affecting the performance of the Company.
In the European Economic Area (EEA), Group businesses are represented on Compass Group’s European Works Council (EWC). Employees from across the Group’s EEA business have been elected to employee representative roles on the EWC which provides a forum for exchanging information and engaging in consultation on the Group’s performance and plans, and relevant transnational issues affecting those countries in the EEA. In the Group’s North America business, employees participate in Compass Community Councils and zone meetings which provide forums for employees across multiple sectors in the same geographic location to exchange best practices. Employees regularly share feedback about how it feels to work at Compass through engagement surveys. These provide management with useful information that helps the businesses to form a good understanding of how employees feel about their workplace and to understand what more can be done to make Compass a great place to work.
Certain employees globally are eligible to participate in the Company’s share schemes, details of which are published on pages 197 and 198, and UK-based employees are eligible to participate in the Company’s Share Incentive Plan. The directors maintain oversight of employee matters through the Board and committee meeting processes and information flows, including regular updates on employee matters and feedback received through employee engagement surveys. The DNED for workforce engagement maintains close links with colleagues tasked with employee engagement across the Group, holds roundtable meetings, is available for direct engagement with employee groups, and feeds back relevant information and issues to the Board. How the directors have engaged with employees and have considered their interests when taking key decisions is further detailed on pages 71,75 and 81.
The Group continues to operate on a decentralised basis. This provides a foundation for an entrepreneurial approach balanced by a rigorous control framework exercised by a small head office team.
128 Governance
Local management teams are responsible for maintaining high standards of health and safety and for ensuring that there is appropriate employee involvement in decision-making.
Eligible employees in the UK are invited to join the Company’s defined contribution pension arrangement, Compass Retirement Income Savings Plan (CRISP). CRISP has a corporate trustee, CRISP Trustees Limited. The Chair, Nigel Palmer, and the other six trustee directors are current or former employees of Compass Group Holdings PLC or Compass Group, UK and Ireland Limited. Three of the employee directors were nominated as directors of the corporate trustee by CRISP members. Those UK employees who transferred from the public sector under TUPE were, typically up until 31 March 2015, eligible to join the Compass Group Pension Plan (the Plan), a defined benefit pension arrangement which has otherwise been closed to new entrants since 2003. However, in accordance with the Government’s revised guidance for ‘Fair Deal for staff pensions’, the approach has been to continue participation in the relevant public sector pension scheme and so the Plan is closed to future entrants. The Plan also has a corporate trustee, Compass Group Pension Trustee Company Limited. The board of the corporate trustee comprises Philip Whittome, independent Chair, one other independent trustee director, and five directors that are UK-based employees or former employees of Compass Group Holdings PLC or Compass Group, UK and Ireland Limited.Three of the employee directors were nominated as directors of the corporate trustee by Plan members. The Group has proposed a transfer of CRISP into the Plan and for CRISP to operate as a separate defined contribution section of the Plan. The combined board of the Plan following the transfer will include trustee directors from both arrangements. The Company is subject to the Pension Automatic Enrolment Regulations for its workforce in the UK. All new UK employees who meet the statutory eligibility criteria, and who do not join CRISP, are automatically enrolled into the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST). Responsibility for the Group’s ongoing compliance with the Pension Automatic Enrolment Regulations and for ensuring that the administration and investment of funds relating to automatic enrolment remain appropriate lies with the Group’s Pension Automatic Enrolment Governance Committee. Permanent employees outside the UK are usually offered membership of local pension arrangements, if and where they exist, and where it is appropriate to have Company-sponsored arrangements. Employees are offered a range of benefits, such as private medical cover, depending on the local environment. Priority is given to the training of employees and the development of their skills. Employment of people with disabilities is considered on merit with regard only to the ability of any applicant to carry out the role. Arrangements to enable people with disabilities to carry out the duties required will be made if it is reasonable to do so. An employee who becomes disabled would, where appropriate, be offered retraining.
Our Code of Business Conduct (CBC) was refreshed and re-launched in June 2023. It provides principles-based guidance to help our businesses do what’s right and sets out clearly the standards of behaviours that we expect. Our values, CBC and Group policies serve as a foundation for how we conduct business and compete fairly, globally. Together, they underpin our environmental, social and governance activities including incorporating the Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact, of which Compass has been a participant since 2004, into strategies, policies, and procedures. This demonstrates Compass’ commitment to continue fostering a culture of integrity and inclusion, whilst playing our part in shaping a sustainable future for our people, the communities in which we operate and the planet. Our people are instrumental to the success of the Group. The individuality and diversity that every employee brings to the Group are respected and valued, and relationships with employees are based on respect for the dignity of the individual and fair treatment for all. The Company publishes an annual statement in accordance with the requirements of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and a copy of the statement is available on the Company’s website, www.compass-group.com.
As at 30 September 2023, there were 562,460 (2022: 513,707) people employed by the Group (average number of employees including directors and part-time employees) of whom 316,474 were female (2022: 290,778) and 245,986 were male (2022: 222,929). 496 were senior managers, of whom 170 were female and 326 were male (2022: 165 female and 349 male), which includes members of our global leadership team and statutory directors of corporate entities whose financial information is consolidated in the Group’s financial statements in this Annual Report. As at 30 September 2023, there were 13 directors, eight of whom were male and five were female. Prior to any appointment to the Board, the Nomination Committee gives due regard to diversity and gender with a view to recommending the appointment of the most suitable candidate for the role. Compass seeks to create a positive and open working environment. Employee policies are set locally to comply with local law within an overall Group framework, and employee satisfaction and engagement are monitored through a number of key performance indicators.
Consideration is given to the concerns of the wider communities in which the Group’s businesses operate, including national and local interests, and utilising relevant expertise to help contribute to the wellbeing of communities in ways which are appropriate to the Group’s business objectives. Furthermore, the Group supports the rights of all people as set out in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN Declaration) and considers carefully before doing any business in countries that do not adhere to the UN Declaration.
The directors regard positive business relationships with suppliers, clients, consumers and others as critical to the Company’s long-term success. The Group’s culture, values and behaviours support open and honest engagement with its stakeholders. High standards of ethical behaviour and probity are maintained in all Compass’ business dealings. For further information on how the Company fosters business relationships and how the directors have had regard to stakeholders’ interests in their principal decision-making processes see pages 74 to 81.
129
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The Companies, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Non- Financial Reporting) Regulations 2016 (the Regulations) require companies to disclose non-financial information necessary to provide investors and other stakeholders with a better understanding of a company’s development, performance, position and impact of its activity. The Audit Committee, which advises the Board on such matters, has concluded that the Company is compliant with the Regulations.
Throughout this Annual Report the directors have disclosed a mix of financial and non-financial KPIs that they believe best reflect the Group’s strategic priorities and will help convey an understanding of the Group’s culture and the drivers contributing to the ongoing success of the Company. The non-financial and sustainability information statement on page 55 identifies where information relating to non-financial matters can be found.
With effect from 1 October 2023, the reporting currency of the Group was changed from sterling to US dollars. On 2 October 2023, the Group sold its business in Argentina. In the period from 1 October to 20 November 2023, 6,357,210 shares were repurchased for a total price of £130 million excluding transaction costs under the £750 million share buyback announced in May 2023. On 2 November 2023, the Group entered into an agreement to acquire Hofmann Menü-Manufaktur GmbH, a leading German manufacturer and supplier of ‘cook and freeze’ meals, for €270m (£234m), subject to regulatory approval which we expect to receive during the first half of the 2024 financial year. On 20 November 2023, a final dividend in respect of the financial year ended 30 September 2023 of 28.1 pence per share, £482 million (based on issued share capital excluding treasury shares as at 30 September 2023) in aggregate, was proposed.
The Company is required to state the annual quantity of emissions in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent from activities for which the Group is responsible, including the combustion of fuel and the operation of directly controlled facilities. Details of our emissions during the year ended 30 September 2023 are set out within the Purpose section of the Strategic Report on page 42 and form part of the Directors’ Report disclosures and are incorporated by reference. Further details of the Group’s actions to reduce emissions can also be found in the Purpose and TCFD sections of this Annual Report on pages 38 to 54.
This Annual Report is certified as a CarbonNeutral® publication, supporting an emissions reduction project to offset the emissions arising from the production, printing and delivery of this Report. This year, the Company has supported a community-based project in Bangladesh, which trains and works with micro-entrepreneurs to help them produce and distribute clean cooking stoves designed to deliver significant emissions reductions, address the health risks of indoor pollution and reduce wood fuel consumption, relieving pressure on local forests and biodiversity.
In accordance with the requirements of the UK Listing Rules, the Company is required to state whether it has made disclosures consistent with the TCFD’s recommendations, or if not, to provide an explanation of why it has not complied and a description of the steps that are being taken or will be taken to enable the Company to make consistent disclosures in the future and the timeframe for compliance. Details of Compass’ TCFD progress and compliance are set out in the Strategic Report on pages 45 to 54 and form part of the Directors’ report disclosures and are incorporated by reference.
Charitable objectives support the Company’s corporate responsibility strategy and have primarily focused on the environment, education, health and wellbeing, community engagement and responsible business practice. Donations have included employee involvement through fundraising and financial support.
| Group charitable donations | £m |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 7.1 |
| 2022 | 7.0 |
Since 2004, shareholders have passed an annual resolution, on a precautionary basis, to approve donations to EU political organisations and to incur political expenditure (as such terms were defined under the then relevant legislation) not exceeding a monetary limit approved by shareholders. The Board has consistently confirmed that it operates a policy of not giving any cash contribution to any political party in the ordinary meaning of those words and that it has no intention of changing that policy.# Other statutory disclosures continued
No material amount of corporate funds or paid employee time has been utilised during the year for political activities and, in accordance with the Company’s CBC, employees must not engage in any form of lobbying or have contact with political representatives, government employees or public interest groups unless they are doing so legitimately and adhering to internal control processes. Further information regarding the CBC can be found on pages 13 and 84 of this Annual Report and on the Company’s website, www.compass-group.com.
The directors propose to renew the authority last granted at the 2023 AGM for the Group to make political donations and incur political expenditure (as such terms are defined in sections 362 to 365 of the CA 2006) until the Company’s next AGM, which they might otherwise be prohibited from making or incurring under the terms of the CA 2006 and which would not amount to ‘donations’ in the ordinary sense of the word. It is proposed to maintain the limit of such authority at £100,000.
The Company’s ordinary shares and sterling Eurobonds are in CREST, the settlement system for stocks and shares.
There are no disclosures required to be made under the FCA’s Listing Rules LR 9.8.4 which have not already been disclosed elsewhere in this Report. Details of long-term incentive plans can be found in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 97 to 126 and details of dividends waived by shareholders can be found on page 127.
The Notice of Meeting setting out the resolutions to be proposed at the 2024 AGM, together with explanatory notes, will be sent to shareholders as a separate document and made available on the Company’s website, www.compass-group.com. The directors consider that each of the resolutions is in the best interests of the Company and the shareholders as a whole and recommend that shareholders vote in favour of all the resolutions.
On behalf of the Board
Alison Yapp
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary
20 November 2023
Compass Group PLC
Registered in England and Wales, No. 4083914
The Annual Report and Accounts complies with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority and the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 in respect of the requirements to produce an annual financial report.
The Annual Report and Accounts is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the directors. We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:
The directors have permitted the auditor to undertake whatever inspections it considers to be appropriate for the purpose of enabling the auditor to give its audit opinion.
On behalf of the Board
Alison Yapp
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary
20 November 2023
The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Group and Parent Company financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Company law requires the directors to prepare Group and Parent Company financial statements for each financial year. Under that law they are required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards and applicable law and have elected to prepare the Parent Company financial statements in accordance with UK accounting standards and applicable law, including FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework.
Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Parent Company and of the Group’s profit or loss for that period.
In preparing each of the Group and Parent Company financial statements, the directors are required to:
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Parent Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Parent Company and enable them to ensure that its financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They have a general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the directors are also responsible for preparing a Strategic report, Directors’ report, Directors’ Remuneration report and Corporate Governance Statement that comply with that law and those regulations.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s website. Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
In accordance with Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule (DTR) 4.1.16R, the financial statements will form part of the annual financial report prepared under DTR 4.1.17R and 4.1.18R. The auditor’s report on these financial statements provides no assurance over whether the annual financial report has been prepared in accordance with those requirements.
The directors confirm that, so far as they are each aware, there is no relevant audit information of which its auditor, KPMG, is unaware and each director has taken all the steps that ought to have been taken as a director to be aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that KPMG is aware of that information.
In our opinion:
We have audited the Group and Parent Company financial statements of Compass Group PLC (“the Company”) for the year ended 30 September 2023 included in the Annual Report, which comprise:
Group
Parent Company (Compass Group PLC)
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our responsibilities are described below. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is a sufficient and appropriate basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion and matters included in this report are consistent with those discussed and included in our reporting to the Audit Committee (“AC”). We have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities under, and we remain independent of the Group in accordance with, UK ethical requirements including the FRC Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities.
Factors driving our view of risks
Following our 2022 audit and considering the developments affecting the Group since then, our assessment of audit risks remains similar to 2022 for key audit matters previously identified. The UK business has continued to recover its trading performance with both revenue and operating profit improving from prior year.# Independent Auditor’s Report
Estimation uncertainty in relation to the assumptions used in the impairment review remains elevated as a result of persistence of input cost inflation and an increase in interest rates leading to a higher discount rate. We therefore consider that the risk associated with goodwill impairment in respect of the UK cash-generating unit as a whole, continues to be heightened, consistent with 2022. Tax authorities around the world continue to provide a high level of scrutiny of transfer pricing arrangements. We therefore consider that the risk associated with uncertain direct tax positions as a whole, continues to be heightened, consistent with 2022. Our assessment is that the risk of recoverability of the Parent Company’s investments in subsidiaries and amounts owed by Group undertakings remains consistent with 2022.
Vs 2022
Item
Goodwill impairment in respect of the UK cash-generating unit
4.1
Uncertain direct tax provisions
4.2
Recoverability of the Parent Company’s investment in subsidiaries and amounts owed by Group undertakings
4.3
During the year, the AC met three times. KPMG are invited to attend all AC meetings and are provided with an opportunity to meet with the AC in private sessions without the executive directors being present. For each key audit matter, we have set out communications with the AC in section 4, including matters that required particular judgement for each. The matters included in the Audit Committee Report on page 83 are materially consistent with our observations of those meetings.
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of Compass Group PLC
Independent Auditor’s report
132
We have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities under, and we remain independent of the Group in accordance with UK ethical requirements including the FRC Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities. Apart from the matters noted below, we have not performed any non-audit services during the financial year ended 30 September 2023 or subsequently which are prohibited by the FRC Ethical Standard. During 2023 we identified that certain KPMG member firms had provided preparation of local GAAP financial statement services over the periods ending September 2017 to 2023 to some group entities which are and have been residual components and therefore not in scope for the Group audit. The services, which have been terminated, were administrative in nature and did not involve any management decision-making or bookkeeping. The work in each case had no direct or indirect effect on Compass Group PLC’s consolidated financial statements. In our professional judgement, we confirm that based on our assessment of the breach, our integrity and objectivity as auditor has not been compromised and we believe that an objective, reasonable and informed third party would conclude that the provision of these services would not impair our integrity or objectivity for any of the impacted financial years. The Audit Committee concurred with this view.
We were first appointed as auditor by the shareholders for the year ended 30 September 2014. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is for the 10 financial years ended 30 September 2023. The Group engagement partner is required to rotate every five years. As these are the fifth set of the Group’s financial statements signed by Zulfikar Kamran Walji, he will be required to rotate off after the 2023 audit. The average tenure of partners responsible for component audits as set out in section 7 below is three years, with the shortest being one and the longest being five.
| Total audit fee | Audit-related fees (including interim review) | Other services | Non-audit fee as a % of total audit and audit-related fee | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| £7.7m | £0.3m | nil | nil | |
| Date first appointed | 14 March 2014 | |||
| Uninterrupted audit tenure | 10 years | |||
| Next financial period which requires a tender | 30 September 2034 | |||
| Tenure of Group engagement partner | 5 years | |||
| Average tenure of component signing partners | 3 years |
| Materiality levels used in our audit | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPM | Group Performance Materiality | 74 | 63 |
| HCM | Highest Component Materiality | 55.5 | 47.2 |
| PCM | Parent Company Materiality | 62.9 | 49 |
| LCM | Lowest Component Materiality | 11.1 | 5 |
| AMPT | Audit Misstatement Posting Threshold | 3.7 | 3.1 |
| AMPT | LCM | 51 | 49 |
| PCM | |||
| HCM | |||
| GPM | |||
| Group |
The scope of our work is influenced by our view of materiality and our assessed risk of material misstatement. We have determined overall materiality for the Group financial statements as a whole at £74m (2022: £63m) and for the Parent Company financial statements as a whole at £49m (2022: £49m). Consistent with 2022, we determined that Group profit before tax remains the benchmark for the Group as it is most reflective of the business, being a profit-seeking company. As such, we based our Group materiality on Group profit before tax, of which it represents 4.2% (2022: 4.3%). Materiality for the Parent Company financial statements was determined with reference to a benchmark of Parent Company total assets, of which it represents 0.3% (2022: 0.4%).
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report
To the members of Compass Group PLC continued
Independent Auditor’s report
133
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
| Group scope (ITEM 7 below) | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Full scope audits | 93% | 90% |
| Remaining components | 7% | 10% |
Group profit before tax
| Group scope (ITEM 7 below) | 2023 | 2022 |
| :------------------------- | :--- | :--- |
| Full scope audits | 93% | 90% |
| Remaining components | 7% | 10% |
Group assets
| Group scope (ITEM 7 below) | 2023 | 2022 |
| :------------------------- | :--- | :--- |
| Full scope audits | 90% | 90% |
| Remaining components | 10% | 10% |
Group revenue
| Group scope (ITEM 7 below) | 2023 | 2022 |
| :------------------------- | :--- | :--- |
| Full scope audits | 90% | 89% |
| Remaining components | 10% | 11% |
We have performed risk assessment and planning procedures to determine which of the Group’s components are likely to include risks of material misstatement to the Group financial statements, the type of procedures to be performed at these components and the extent of involvement required from our component auditors around the world. Of the Group’s 49 (2022: 51) reporting components, we subjected 15 (2022:15) to full scope audits for Group purposes. The components within the scope of our work accounted for the percentages illustrated below. In addition, we have performed Group-level analysis on the remaining components to determine whether further risks of material misstatement exist in those components. We consider the scope of our audit, as communicated to the Audit Committee, to be an appropriate basis for our audit opinion.
In planning our audit, we considered the potential impacts of climate change on the Group’s business and its financial statements. The Group has set out in the Strategic Report its commitment to reach net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the global value chain by 2050, to reach climate neutrality in the Group’s direct operations by 2030, and its commitment to several other shorter-term targets. As part of our audit, we have performed a risk assessment, including enquiries of management, to understand how the impact of commitments made by the Group in respect of climate change, as well as the physical or transition risks of climate change, may affect the financial statements and our audit. There was no material impact from this work on our key audit matters. Whilst the Group is still undertaking work to quantify and assess the potential impact of climate change on the business, based on the risk assessment procedures we performed, including reading the Group’s roadmap for transitioning to net zero GHGs, we did not identify any significant risk in this period of climate change having a material impact on the Group’s critical accounting estimates. This is due to the shorter-term nature of certain estimates (tax provisioning), the nature of the estimate itself (pension liabilities) and the level of headroom (impairment of goodwill and intangible assets). In addition, we did not identify any significant risks in this period to the carrying value and useful economic lives of property, plant and equipment caused by the projected physical risks of climate change or the transition to a net zero operating model. We have read the disclosures of climate-related information in the Annual Report and considered their consistency with the financial statements and our audit knowledge. We have not been engaged to provide assurance over the accuracy of the climate risk disclosures in the Annual Report.
Coverage of Group financial statements
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the members of Compass Group PLC continued
Independent Auditor’s report
134
The directors have prepared the financial statements on the going concern basis as they do not intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease their operations, and as they have concluded that the Group’s and the Parent Company’s financial position means that this is realistic. They have also concluded that there are no material uncertainties that could have cast significant doubt over their ability to continue as a going concern over the period to 31 March 2025 (“the going concern period”).
We used our knowledge of the Group, its industry and the general economic environment to identify the inherent risks to its business model and analysed how those risks might affect the Group’s and Parent Company’s financial resources or ability to continue operations over the going concern period. The risk that we considered most likely to adversely affect the Group’s available financial resources and/or metrics relevant to debt covenants over this period was the impact of elevated input cost inflation on the Group’s performance and the ability of the Group to mitigate and recover the medium-term impact of persistent inflation. We also considered less predictable but realistic second-order impacts, such as a significant decline in volumes as a consequence of a global economic downturn.We considered whether these risks could plausibly affect the liquidity or covenant compliance in the going concern period by comparing severe but plausible downside scenarios that could arise from these risks individually and collectively against the level of available financial resources and covenants indicated by the Group’s financial forecasts. We considered whether the going concern disclosure on page 151 of the Group financial statements gives a full and accurate description of the directors’ assessment of going concern, including the identified risks and related sensitivities. Accordingly, based on those procedures, we found the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting without any material uncertainty for the Group and Parent Company to be acceptable. However, as we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were made, the above conclusions are not a guarantee that the Group or the Parent Company will continue in operation.
Our conclusions – We consider that the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate; – We have not identified, and concur with the directors’ assessment that there is not, a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group’s or Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the going concern period; – We have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors’ statement in note 1 to the financial statements on the use of the going concern basis of accounting with no material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt over the Group and Parent Company’s use of that basis for the going concern period, and we found the going concern disclosure in note 1 to be acceptable; and – The related statement under the Listing Rules set out on page 21 is materially consistent with the financial statements and our audit knowledge.
Disclosures of emerging and principal risks and longer-term viability
Our responsibility
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether there is a material inconsistency between the directors’ disclosures in respect of emerging and principal risks and the viability statement, and the financial statements and our audit knowledge. Based on those procedures, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
– the directors’ confirmation within the viability statement on page 31 that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks facing the Group, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency and liquidity;
– the Principal Risks disclosures describing these risks and how emerging risks are identified, and explaining how they are being managed and mitigated; and
– the directors’ explanation in the viability statement of how they have assessed the prospects of the Group, over what period they have done so and why they considered that period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of their assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.
We are also required to review the viability statement set out on page 31 under the Listing Rules. Our work is limited to assessing these matters in the context of only the knowledge acquired during our financial statements audit. As we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were made, the absence of anything to report on these statements is not a guarantee as to the Group’s and Parent Company’s longer-term viability.
Our reporting
We have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to these disclosures. We have concluded that these disclosures are materially consistent with the financial statements and our audit knowledge.
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report
To the members of Compass Group PLC
135Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
What we mean
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by us, including those which had thegreatest effect on:
– the overall audit strategy;
– the allocation of resources in the audit; and
– directing the efforts of the engagement team.
We include below the key audit matters in decreasing order of audit significance together with our key audit procedures to address those matters and our results from those procedures. These matters were addressed, and our results are based on procedures undertaken, for the purpose of our audit of the financial statements as a whole. We do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
4.1 Goodwill impairment in respect of the UK cash-generating unit (Group)
| Financial statement elements | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Goodwill (UK CGU) | £1,538m | £1,481m |
Our assessment of risk vs 2022
Consistent with 2022, estimation uncertainty in relation to the UK business remains elevated as a result of persistent input cost inflation and an increase in interest rates leading to a higher discount rate.
Our results
2023: Acceptable
2022: Acceptable
Description of the key audit matter
Forecast-based assessment: The Group has a significant carrying amount of goodwill which isspread across a range of cash-generating units (CGUs) in differentcountries. The value-in-use calculation for the CGUs, which represents the estimated recoverable amount, is subjective due to the inherent uncertainty involved in forecasting and discounting estimated future cash flows (specifically the key assumptions such as revenue, operating margin, long-term growth rate and discount rate). Estimation uncertainty in relation to the UK business remains high as a result of persistence of input cost inflation and an increase in interest rates leading to a higher discount rate. The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk assessment, we determined that the carrying amount of the UK CGU has a highdegree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality for the financial statements as a whole, and possibly many times that amount. The financial statements (note 9) disclose the sensitivity estimated by the Group. These disclosures give relevant information about the estimation uncertainty including the risk of a reduction in the headroom or need for an impairment as a result of a reasonably possible change in one or more of the key assumptions.
Our response to the risk
We performed the tests below rather than seeking to rely on any of the Group’s controls because the nature of the balance is such that we would expect to obtain audit evidence primarily through the detailed procedures described.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
– Historical comparisons: We assessed the Group’s ability to forecast accurately by comparing assumptions made in historic forecasts to actual results achieved;
– Our sector experience: We critically assessed the Group’s assumptions on revenue and operating profit margin taking account of strategic plans approved by the Board, our wider knowledge of the industry and the performance of other comparable CGUs; We used our valuations experts to challenge the appropriateness of discount rate by deriving our own independent range;
– Benchmarking assumptions: We challenged the Group’s long-term growth rate assumption by corroborating this to external data sources;
– Sensitivity analysis: We performed sensitivity analysis on the key assumptions noted above to identify the extent to which changes in those assumptions could give risk to an impairment;
– Assessing transparency: We assessed whether the Group’s disclosures about the sensitivity of the outcome of the impairment assessment to a reasonably possible change in key assumptions reflects the risks inherent in the estimation of the recoverable amount of goodwill.
Communications with Compass Group PLC’s Audit Committee
Our discussions with and reporting to the Audit Committee included:
– Our audit approach as set out above, including not seeking to rely on any of the Group’s controls, and the involvement of our valuation specialists;
– Our conclusions from the procedures performed; and
– Our views on the disclosures included in the financial statements with respect to the UK CGU and the sensitivity of the impairment conclusions to reasonably possible changes in assumptions.
Area of particular auditor judgement
We identified the following as the areas of particular auditor judgement:
– The estimate is particularly sensitive to key assumptions in the impairment model including revenue growth rates, operating profit margins, long-term growth rates and discount rates and auditor judgement is required to assess whether the directors’ overall estimate falls within an acceptable range.
Our results
We found the Group’s conclusion that there is no impairment of the UK CGU’s goodwill to be acceptable (2022: acceptable) and we found the sensitivity disclosures made to be acceptable (2022: acceptable).
Location of further information in the Annual Report and Accounts: see the Audit Committee Report on page 83 for details on how the Audit Committee considered goodwill impairment in respect of the UK CGU as an area of significant attention, page 162 for the accounting policy on goodwill and note 9 for the financial disclosures.# Independent Auditor’s Report
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Direct tax provisions | £214m | £245m |
Disclosure of other sources of estimation uncertainty – note 6 to the group financial statements
Our assessment of risk vs 2022: Our assessment is that the risk is similar to 2022
Our results: 2023: Acceptable, 2022: Acceptable
Subjective estimate: The Group operates across a large number of jurisdictions and is subject to periodic challenges by local tax authorities on a range of tax matters during the normal course of business, including transfer pricing. As a result of the complexities of tax rules on transfer pricing and other tax legislation, the provisioning for uncertain direct tax positions is judgemental and requires the directors to make estimates in relation to these uncertainties. The directors’ estimation includes assessing the likelihood of potentially material exposures as a result of changes in local tax regulations and evaluating ongoing inspections by local tax authorities and international bodies, which could materially impact the amounts recorded in the Group financial statements.
We performed the tests below rather than seeking to rely on any of the Group’s controls because the small number of transactions meant that detailed testing is inherently the most effective means of obtaining audit evidence.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
Our discussions with and reporting to the Audit Committee included:
We identified the following as the areas of particular auditor judgement:
The assessment of the outcome of investigations by the authorities, if a liability exists and in making an estimate of any economic outflows.
We found the level of tax provisioning to be acceptable (2022: acceptable).
Location of further information in the Annual Report and Accounts: see the Audit Committee Report on page 83 for details on how the Audit Committee considered direct tax provisions as an area of significant attention, page 158 for the accounting policy on tax and note 6 for the financial disclosures.
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Investment in subsidiaries and amounts owed by Group undertakings | £6,714m investments, £7,964m amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings | £1,105m investments, £10,699m amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings |
Our assessment of risk vs 2022: Our assessment is that the risk is similar to 2022
Our results: 2023: Acceptable, 2022: Acceptable
Low risk, high value: The carrying amount of the Parent Company’s investments in subsidiaries and intercompany receivables represents 97% (2022: 88%) of the Company’s total assets. We do not consider the recoverability of these investments and intercompany receivables to be at a high risk of significant misstatement, or to be subject to a significant level of judgement. However, due to their materiality in the context of the Parent Company financial statements as a whole, this is considered to be the area which had the greatest effect on our overall Parent Company audit.
We performed the tests below rather than seeking to rely on any of the Company’s controls because the nature of the balance is such that we would expect to obtain audit evidence primarily through the detailed procedures described.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
Our discussions with and reporting to the Audit Committee included:
We found the Parent Company’s conclusion that there is no impairment of its investment in subsidiaries and amount owned by Group undertaking to be acceptable (2022: acceptable).
Location of further information in the Annual Report and Accounts: refer to page 224 for the accounting policy on investments in subsidiary undertakings and notes 2 and 3 for the financial disclosures.
To identify risks of material misstatement due to fraud (“fraud risks”) we assessed events or conditions that could indicate an incentive or pressure to commit fraud or provide an opportunity to commit fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included:
We communicated identified fraud risks throughout the audit team and remained alert to any indications of fraud throughout the audit. This included communication from the Group audit team to component audit teams of relevant fraud risks identified at the Group level and request to component audit teams to report to the Group audit team any instances of fraud that could give rise to a material misstatement at the Group level.
As required by auditing standards, and taking into account possible pressures to meet profit targets and our overall knowledge of the control environment, we perform procedures to address the risk of management override of controls and the risk of fraudulent revenue recognition, in particular the risk that Group and component management may be in a position to make inappropriate accounting entries. We did not identify any additional fraud risks.
In determining the audit procedures, we took into account the results of our evaluation of some of the Group-wide fraud risk management controls. We performed procedures including:
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the financial statements from our general commercial and sector experience and through discussion with the directors and other management (as required by auditing standards), and from inspection of the Group’s regulatory and legal correspondence; and discussed with the directors and other management the policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations.
We communicated identified laws and regulations throughout our team and remained alert to any indications of non-compliance throughout the audit. This included communication from the Group audit team to component audit teams of relevant laws and regulations identified at the Group level, and a request for component auditors to report to the Group team any instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that could give rise to a material misstatement at Group.
Firstly, the Group is subject to laws and regulations that directly affect the financial statements, including financial reporting legislation (including related companies legislation), distributable profits legislation and taxation legislation, and we assessed the extent of compliance with these laws and regulations as part of our procedures on the related financial statement items.
Secondly, the Group is subject to many other laws and regulations where the consequences of non-compliance could have a material effect on amounts or disclosures in the financial statements, for instance through the imposition of fines or litigation. We identified the following areas as those most likely to have such an effect: health and safety (food and employees), anti-bribery, data privacy, competition and employment law.
Auditing standards limit the required audit procedures to identify non-compliance with these laws and regulations to enquiry of the directors and other management and inspection of regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. Therefore, if a breach of operational regulations is not disclosed to us or evident from relevant correspondence, an audit will not detect that breach.
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some material misstatements in the financial statements, even though we have properly planned and performed our audit in accordance with auditing standards. For example, the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely the inherently limited procedures required by auditing standards would identify it. In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of non-detection of fraud, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect material misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing non-compliance or fraud and cannot be expected to detect non-compliance with all laws and regulations.
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set quantitative thresholds and overlay qualitative considerations to help us determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our procedures, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in the aggregate, on the financial statements as a whole.
A quantitative reference for the purpose of planning and performing our audit.
Materiality for the Group financial statements as a whole was set at £74m (2022: £63m). This was determined with reference to a benchmark of Group profit before tax from continuing operations (PBTCO). Consistent with 2022, we determined that PBTCO remains the main benchmark for the Group considering the sector in which it operates, its ownership and financing structure, and the focus of users of the financial statements. As such, we based our Group materiality on PBTCO of £1,747m (2022: £1,469m). Our Group materiality of £74m was determined by applying a percentage to the PBTCO. When using a benchmark of PBTCO to determine overall materiality, KPMG’s approach for listed entities considers a guideline range of 3% to 5% of the measure. In setting overall Group materiality, we applied a percentage of 4.2% (2022: 4.3%) to the benchmark.
Materiality for the Parent Company financial statements as a whole was set at £49m (2022: £49m), determined with reference to a benchmark of Parent Company total assets, of which it represents 0.3% (2022: 0.4%).
Our procedures on individual account balances and disclosures were performed to a lower threshold, performance materiality, so as to reduce to an acceptable level the risk that individually immaterial misstatements in individual account balances add up to a material amount across the financial statements as a whole.
We have considered performance materiality at a level of 75% (2022: 75%) of materiality for Compass Group PLC Group financial statements as a whole to be appropriate. The Parent Company performance materiality was set at £36.7m (2022: £36.7m), which equates to 75% (2022: 75%) of materiality for the Parent Company financial statements as a whole. We applied this percentage in our determination of performance materiality because we did not identify any factors indicating an elevated level of risk.
This is the amount below which identified misstatements are considered to be clearly trivial from a quantitative point of view. We may become aware of misstatements below this threshold which could alter the nature, timing and scope of our audit procedures, for example if we identify smaller misstatements which are indicators of fraud. This is also the amount above which all misstatements identified are communicated to Compass Group PLC’s Audit Committee.
We set our audit misstatement posting threshold at 5% (2022: 5%) of our materiality for the Group financial statements. We also report to the Audit Committee any other identified misstatements that warrant reporting on qualitative grounds.
| Financial statement caption | Group revenue | Group profit before tax | Total Group assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | |
| £31,028m | £25,512m | £1,747m | £1,469m |
| Group materiality as % of caption | 0.24% | 0.25% | 4.2% |
How the Group audit team determined the procedures to be performed across the Group.
The Group has 49 (2021: 51) reporting components. In order to determine the work performed at the reporting component level, we identified those components which we considered to be of individual financial significance, those which were significant due to risk and those remaining components on which we required procedures to be performed to provide us with the evidence we required in order to conclude on the Group financial statements as a whole. We determined individually financially significant components as those contributing at least 10% (2022: 10%) of Group revenue or Group total assets. We selected Group revenue and Group total assets because these are the most representative of the relative size of the components. We identified 1 (2022: 1) component as an individually financially significant component and performed a full scope audit on this component. In addition to the individually financially significant component, we identified 1 (2022: 1) component as significant, owing to significant risk of material misstatement affecting the Group financial statements. We performed a full scope audit on this component. In addition, to enable us to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence for the Group financial statements as a whole, we selected 13 (2022: 13) components on which to perform full scope audit procedures.
The components within the scope of our work accounted for the following percentages of the Group’s results, with the prior year comparatives indicated in brackets:
| Scope | Number of components | Range of materiality applied | Group revenue | Group profit before tax | Group total assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full scope audit | 15 (15) | £11.1m - £62.9m (£5m - £51m) | 90% (89%) | 93% (90%) | 90% (90%) |
The remaining 10% (2022: 11%) of Group revenue, 7% (2022: 10%) of Group profit before tax and 10% (2022: 10%) of total Group assets is represented by 34 (2022: 36) reporting components, none of which individually represented more than 2% (2022: 3%) of any of Group revenue, Group profit before tax or total Group assets.# KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report
141Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The directors are responsible for the other information presented in the Annual Report together with the financial statements. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except as explicitly stated below, any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether, based on our financial statements audit work, the information therein is materially misstated or inconsistent with the financial statements or our audit knowledge.
Based solely on that work we have not identified material misstatements or inconsistencies in the other information.
Based solely on our work on the other information described above we report to you as follows:
* we have not identified material misstatements in the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report;
* in our opinion the information given in those reports for the financial year is consistent with the financial statements; and
* in our opinion those reports have been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
We are required to form an opinion as to whether the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether there is a material inconsistency between the financial statements and our audit knowledge, and:
* the directors’ statement that they consider that the annual report and financial statements taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s position and performance, business model and strategy;
* the section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit Committee, including the significant issues that the Audit Committee considered in relation to the financial statements, and how these issues were addressed; and
* the section of the Annual Report that describes the review of the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems.
Based on those procedures, we have concluded that each of these disclosures is materially consistent with the financial statements and our audit knowledge. We are also required to review the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Group’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified by the Listing Rules for our review. We have nothing to report in this respect.
Under the Companies Act 2006, we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
* adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
* the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
* certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
* we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
We have nothing to report in these respects.
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the members of Compass Group PLC continued
Independent Auditor’s report
142
As explained more fully in their statement set out on page 131, the directors are responsible for: the preparation of the financial statements including being satisfied that they give a true and fair view; assessing the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern; and using the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. In addition, the directors are responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue our opinion in an auditor’s report. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but does not guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. A fuller description of our responsibilities is provided on the FRC’s website at www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. The Company is required to include these financial statements in an annual financial report prepared using the single electronic reporting format specified in the TD ESEF Regulation. This auditor’s report provides no assurance over whether the annual financial report has been prepared in accordance with that format.
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members, as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Zulfikar Walji (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of KPMG LLP,
Statutory Auditor
Chartered Accountants
15 Canada Square, London E14 5GL
20 November 2023
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report
To the members of Compass Group PLC
143
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
144
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 31,028 | 25,512 | 2 |
| Operating costs | (29,193) | (24,057) | 3 |
| Operating profit before joint ventures and associates | 1,835 | 1,455 | |
| Share of results of joint ventures and associates | 56 | 45 | 2, 14 |
| Underlying operating profit | 1,891 | 1,500 | 1, 34 |
| Acquisition-related charges | (125) | (92) | 3, 34 |
| Charges related to the strategic portfolio review | (99) | – | 3, 34 |
| Other | (7) | 2 | 2, 34 |
| Operating profit | 1,710 | 1,415 | 2 |
| Net gain/(loss) on sale and closure of businesses | 20 | (7) | 27, 34 |
| Finance income | 48 | 11 | 5 |
| Finance expense | (184) | (111) | 5 |
| Other financing items | (28) | 76 | 5, 34 |
| Finance costs | (164) | (24) | |
| Profit before tax | 1,574 | 1,391 | |
| Income tax expense | (429) | (352) | 6 |
| Profit for the year | 1,145 | 1,039 | |
| Attributable to Equity shareholders | 1,141 | 1,036 | |
| Non- | |||
| ## Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 30 September 2023 |
| Notes | £m | £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year | 1,318 | 1,117 | |
| Other comprehensive income | |||
| Items that will not be reclassified to the income statement | |||
| Remeasurement of post -employment benefit obligations | 24 | 27 | 1,038 |
| Return on plan assets, excluding interest income | 24 | (271) | (668) |
| Change in asset ceiling, excluding interest income | 24 | 5 | 3 |
| Change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | 15 | 94 | (133) |
| Tax credit/(charge) on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income | 30 | (65) | (115) |
| 175 | |||
| Items that may be reclassified to the income statement | |||
| Currency translation differences | 1 | (335) | 591 |
| Reclassification of cumulative currency translation differences on sale of businesses | 27 | (1) | 7 |
| Tax credit on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income | 3 | – | (333) |
| 598 | |||
| Total other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year | (448) | 773 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 870 | 1,890 | |
| Attributable to Equity shareholders | 866 | 1,886 | |
| Non -controlling interests | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 870 | 1,890 |
| Attributable to equity shareholders | | | | | | |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| | Share capital | Share premium | Other reserves | Retained earnings | Non-controlling interests | Total equity |
| Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 1 October 2022 | 198 | 189 | 4,068 | 1,419 | 31 | 5,905 |
| Profit for the year | – | – | – | 1,314 | 4 | 1,318 |
| Other comprehensive income | | | | | | |
| Remeasurement of post -employment benefit obligations | 24 | – | – | – | 27 | – | 27 |
| Return on plan assets, excluding interest income | 24 | – | – | – | (271) | – | (271) |
| Change in asset ceiling, excluding interest income | 24 | – | – | – | 5 | – | 5 |
| Change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | 15 | – | – | – | 94 | – | 94 |
| Currency translation differences | | – | – | (335) | – | – | (335) |
| Reclassification of cumulative currency translation differences on sale of businesses | 27 | – | – | (1) | – | – | (1) |
| Tax credit on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income | 6 | – | – | 3 | 30 | – | 33 |
| Total other comprehensive loss for the year | – | – | (333) | (115) | – | (448) |
| Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the year | – | – | (333) | 1,199 | 4 | 870 |
| Fair value of share -based payments | 26 | – | – | – | 44 | – | 44 |
| Change in fair value of non -controlling interest put options | | – | – | 13 | – | – | 13 |
| Changes to non -controlling interests due to acquisitions and disposals | | – | – | (2) | – | 2 | – |
| Reclassification of non -controlling interest put options reserve on exercise of put options | | – | – | 6 | – | (6) | – |
| Cost of shares transferred to employees | | – | – | 26 | (26) | – | – |
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback | 2 | – | – | – | (1,004) | – | (1,004) |
| Purchase of own shares – employee share-based payments | | – | – | (16) | – | – | (16) |
| Tax credit on items taken directly to equity | 6 | – | – | – | 3 | – | 3 |
| | 198 | 189 | 2,758 | 2,639 | 31 | 5,815 |
| Dividends paid to equity shareholders | 8 | – | – | – | (648) | – | (648) |
| Dividends paid to non -controlling interests | | – | – | – | – | (6) | (6) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 198 | 189 | 2, 758 | 1,991 | 25 | 5,161 |
| Attributable to equity shareholders | | | | | | |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| | Share capital | Share premium | Other reserves | Retained earnings | Non-controlling interests | Total equity |
| Notes | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| At 1 October 2021 | 198 | 189 | 4,262 | 242 | 28 | 4,919 |
| Profit for the year | – | – | – | 1,113 | 4 | 1,117 |
| Other comprehensive income | | | | | | |
| Remeasurement of post -employment benefit obligations | 24 | – | – | – | 1,038 | – | 1,038 |
| Return on plan assets, excluding interest income | 24 | – | – | – | (668) | – | (668) |
| Change in asset ceiling, excluding interest income | 24 | – | – | – | 3 | – | 3 |
| Change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | 15 | – | – | – | (133) | – | (133) |
| Currency translation differences | | – | – | 591 | – | – | 591 |
| Reclassification of cumulative currency translation differences on sale of businesses | 27 | – | – | 7 | – | – | 7 |
| Tax charge on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income | 6 | – | – | – | (65) | – | (65) |
| Total other comprehensive income for the year | – | – | 598 | 175 | – | 773 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | – | – | 598 | 1,288 | 4 | 1,890 |
| Fair value of share -based payments | 26 | – | – | 34 | – | – | 34 |
| Change in fair value of non -controlling interest put options | | – | – | (2) | – | – | (2) |
| Changes to non -controlling interests due to acquisitions and disposals | | – | – | (7) | – | 8 | 1 |
| Purchase of non -controlling interests | | – | – | – | (7) | (1) | (8) |
| Reclassification of non -controlling interest put options reserve on exercise of put options | | – | – | 5 | – | (5) | – |
| Release of share awards settled in existing shares purchased in the market | | – | – | (4) | – | – | (4) |
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback | 2 | – | – | – | (502) | – | (502) |
| Purchase of own shares – employee share-based payments | | – | – | (6) | – | – | (6) |
| Transfer | | – | – | (314) | 314 | – | – |
| | 198 | 189 | 4,064 | 1,837 | 34 | 6,322 |
| Dividends paid to equity shareholders | 8 | – | – | – | (418) | – | (418) |
| Dividends paid to non -controlling interests | | – | – | – | – | (3) | (3) |
| Cost of shares transferred to employees | | – | – | 4 | – | – | 4 |
| At 30 September 2022 | 198 | 189 | 4,068 | 1,419 | 31 | 5,905 |
| 30 September 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Notes | £m | |
| Non-current assets | ||
| Goodwill | 9 | 5,002 |
| Other intangible assets | 10 | 2,032 |
| Costs to obtain and fulfil contracts | 11 | 1,078 |
| Right -of-use assets | 12 | 813 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 13 | 955 |
| Interests in joint ventures and associates | 14 | 244 |
| Other investments | 15 | 860 |
| Post -employment benefit assets | 24 | 430 |
| Trade and other receivables | 16 | 253 |
| Deferred tax assets | 6 | 19 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 20 | 45 |
| Non-current assets | 11,905 | |
| Current assets | ||
| Inventories | 17 | 567 |
| Trade and other receivables | 16 | 4,174 |
| Tax recoverable | 89 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 18 | 843 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 20 | 18 |
| 5,691 | ||
| Assets held for sale | 27 | 4 |
| Current assets | 5,695 | |
| Total assets | 17,600 | |
| Current liabilities | ||
| Borrowings | 19 | (1,087) |
| Lease liabilities | 12 | (194) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 20 | (37) |
| Provisions | 23 | (233) |
| Current tax liabilities | (214) | |
| Trade and other payables | 22 | (5,870) |
| Current liabilities | (7,635) | |
| Non-current liabilities | ||
| Borrowings | 19 | (2,283) |
| Lease liabilities | 12 | (751) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 20 | (207) |
| Post -employment benefit obligations | 24 | (806) |
| Provisions | 23 | (286) |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 6 | (108) |
| Trade and other payables | 22 | (363) |
| Non-current liabilities | (4,804) | |
| Total liabilities | (12,439) | |
| Net assets | 5,161 | |
| Equity | ||
| Share capital | 25 | 198 |
| Share premium | 189 | |
| Other reserves | 1 | 2,758 |
| Retained earnings | 1,991 | |
| Total equity shareholders’ funds | 5,136 | |
| Non -controlling interests | 25 | 25 |
| Total equity | 5,161 |
| Notes | £m | £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | |||
| Cash generated from operations | 28 | 2,687 | 2,024 |
| Interest paid | (170) | (96) | |
| Tax received | 25 | 31 | |
| Tax paid | (466) | (363) | |
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 2,076 | 1,596 | |
| Cash flow from investing activities | |||
| Purchase of subsidiary companies | 27 | (319) | (263) |
| Purchase of interests in joint ventures and associates | 14 | (7) | (28) |
| Net proceeds from sale of subsidiary companies, joint ventures and associates net of exit costs | 1 | 27 | 47 |
| Purchase of intangible assets | (215) | (177) | |
| Purchase of contract fulfilment assets | 11 | (311) | (218) |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (365) | (282) | |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets | 64 | 37 | |
| Purchase of other investments | 15 | (3) | (42) |
| Proceeds from sale of other investments | 3 | 3 | |
| Dividends received from joint ventures and associates | 14 | 49 | 51 |
| Interest received | 50 | 10 | |
| Net cash flow from investing activities | (1,007) | (874) | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | |||
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback | (929) | (425) | |
| Purchase of own shares – employee share-based payments | (16) | (6) | |
| Increase in borrowings | 1 | 677 | |
| Repayment of borrowings | (438) | (297) | |
| Net cash flow from derivative financial instruments | 127 | (67) | |
| Repayment of principal under lease liabilities | (176) | (152) | |
| Purchase of non-controlling interests | (8) | (2) | |
| Dividends paid to equity shareholders | 8 | (648) | (418) |
| Dividends paid to non -controlling interests | (6) | (3) | |
| Net cash flow from financing activities | (2,093) | (1,369) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | |||
| Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | (1,024) | 353 |
The consolidated financial statements of Compass Group PLC (the Company) have been prepared on a going concern basis, as discussed on page 151, in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of certain financial instruments.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in sterling, which is the functional and reporting currency of the Company. The consolidated financial statements consolidate the results of the Company and entities controlled by the Company (its subsidiaries), and include the Group’s share of the results of its interests in joint ventures and associates using the equity method. Subsidiaries are entities over which the Company has control. Control exists when the Company has power over an entity, exposure to variable returns from its involvement with an entity and the ability to use its power over the entity to affect its returns. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are also considered when assessing control.
Where necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates to bring the accounting policies used in line with those used by the Group. The results of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated income statement from the effective date of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal, as appropriate. All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation. Where a subsidiary transacts with a joint operation of the Group, profits or losses are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the relevant joint operation.
In preparing the financial statements of individual companies within the Group, transactions in currencies other than the companies’ functional currency are recorded at the rates of exchange on the dates of the transaction. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates on the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on retranslation are included in the consolidated income statement for the year, except for where they arise on items taken directly to other comprehensive income, in which case they are also recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the Group’s overseas operations (expressed in their functional currencies, being the currency of the primary economic environment in which each entity operates) are translated at the exchange rates on the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period. Exchange differences arising, if any, are classified as equity and transferred to the Group’s translation reserve. Such translation differences are recognised as income or expense in the period in which the operation is disposed of. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing exchange rate.
The significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out in the relevant notes. These policies have been applied consistently to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
Significant accounting policies are indicated by the following icon: 📑
There were no new accounting standards or amendments to existing standards effective in the current year that had a significant impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements. There are a number of changes to accounting standards, effective in future years, which are not expected to significantly impact the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgements in respect of the application of its accounting policies which impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Whilst there are no judgements that management considers to be critical in the preparation of these financial statements, there is a significant judgement in respect of the classification of cash payments relating to contract fulfilment assets in the cash flow statement (see note 11).
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates which impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. These estimates are based on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Sources of estimation uncertainty are indicated by the following icon: ❓
The Group’s major sources of estimation uncertainty are in relation to goodwill in the UK cash-generating unit and post-employment benefit obligations on the basis that a reasonably possible change in key assumptions could have a material effect on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the next 12 months (see notes 9 and 24, respectively).
In addition to the major sources of estimation uncertainty, tax has been identified as another source of estimation uncertainty. Whilst this is not considered to be a major source of uncertainty as defined by IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, the recognition and measurement of certain material assets and liabilities are based on assumptions and/or are subject to longer-term uncertainties (see note 6).
Climate change is identified as a principal risk as its impact on the environment may lead to issues around food sourcing and supply chain continuity in some of the Group’s markets (see page 26). The potential impact of climate change has been assessed with scenario analysis conducted in line with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations (see pages 51 and 52). In October 2021, the Group announced a commitment to reach climate net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across its global operations and value chain by 2050 (see page 52).
Climate change considerations are indicated by the following icon: ☁️
The potential impact of climate change and the Group’s net zero commitments on the following areas has been considered:
There was no impact on the reported amounts in the financial statements as a result of this review.
The Group’s business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in the Strategic report on pages 2 to 55. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows, liquidity position and borrowing facilities are discussed in the Financial review on pages 16 to 21. The directors consider it appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis for the reasons stated below.
At 30 September 2023, the Group’s financing arrangements included sterling and Euro bonds (£2,353m) and US dollar US Private Placement (USPP) notes (£851m). In addition, the Group had Revolving Credit Facilities of £2,000m, committed to August 2026, which were fully undrawn, and £680m of cash, net of overdrafts. At the date of approving these consolidated financial statements, the liquidity position of the Group has remained substantially unchanged.
For the purposes of the going concern assessment, the directors have prepared monthly cash flow projections for the period to 31 March 2025 (the assessment period) from the most recent three-year strategic plan approved by the Board in November 2023. We consider 18 months to be a reasonable period for the going concern assessment as it enables us to consider the potential impact of macroeconomic and geopolitical factors over an extended period.
Debt maturities in the going concern period include a $352m (£288m) USPP note in October 2023, a €750m (£651m) Eurobond in July 2024 and a $100m (£82m) USPP note in December 2024. The USPP notes are subject to leverage and interest cover covenants which are tested on 31 March and 30 September each year. The Group met both covenants at 30 September 2023. The Group’s other financing arrangements do not contain any financial covenants. The cash flow projections show that the Group has significant headroom against its committed facilities and meets its financial covenant obligations under the USPP notes without any refinancing.
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents at 1 October | 1,732 | 1,656 |
| Currency translation (losses)/gains on cash and cash equivalents | (28) | 47 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 30 September | 680 | 1,732 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 843 | 1,983 |
| Bank overdrafts | (163) | (251) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 30 September | 680 | 1,732 |
The accompanying notes form part of these consolidated financial statements.
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 149
150 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
151The Group has performed a stress test against the base case to determine the performance level that would result in a reduction in headroom against its committed facilities to nil or a breach of its covenants. The Group’s committed facilities would be reached in the event that underlying operating profit reduced by more than 60% of the strategic plan level. The directors do not consider this scenario to be likely. The stress test assumes no share buybacks or new business acquisitions as mitigating actions, with the exception of the acquisition of Hofmann Menü -Manufaktur GmbH which was agreed on 2 November 2023 subject to regulatory approval (see note 33). Consequently, the directors are confident that the Group and Parent Company will have sufficient funds to continue to meet their liabilities as they fall due for at least the period to 31 March 2025 and, therefore, have prepared the financial statements on a going concern basis.
Climate change
Climate change and the Group’s net zero commitments are not expected to have a material impact during the going concern period.
The segmental information presented is consistent with management reporting provided to the Executive Committee (the chief operating decision maker). The Executive Committee monitors the underlying revenue and operating profit of its three geographical segments, North America, Europe and Rest of World, to assess performance and allocate resources. The Group also has a separate segment for central activities which includes costs in respect of central functions, including finance, legal, commercial, IT and human resources. Underlying revenue and operating profit are reconciled to GAAP measures below. Finance costs and income tax expense are managed on a Group basis.
Revenue represents income derived from contracts for the provision of food and support services by the Group to customers in exchange for consideration in the normal course of business. The Group’s revenue is comprised of revenues under its contracts with clients. Clients engage the Group to provide food and support services at their locations. Depending on the type of client and service, we are paid either by our client and/or directly by the consumers to whom we have been provided access by our client, such as the client’s employees, visitors, pupils, patients and spectators. Payment terms are set at contract level and vary according to country, sector and individual client.
At contract inception, the contract is assessed to identify each promise to transfer either a distinct good or service or a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer. Goods and services are distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations in the contract if the customer can benefit from them either on their own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer and they are separately identifiable in the contract.
The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the Group expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised goods and services to the customer, excluding value added tax and similar sales taxes. For example, the transaction price may be based on a price per meal, which may vary with volume, or could be based on costs incurred plus an agreed management fee. The Group makes a variety of ongoing payments to clients, mainly commissions, concession rentals and reimbursement of utility costs. These are assessed for treatment as consideration paid to customers, and where they are not in exchange for a distinct good or service, they are recognised as a reduction of the transaction price. In addition, the Group may make a payment to a client typically at the start of a contract which is not an investment in service assets and does not generate or enhance the Group’s resources. Such payments are reported as prepayments and, as they are not considered to be in exchange for a distinct good or service, they are charged to the income statement as a deduction to revenue recognised over the contract term rather than as an operating cost.
The Group recognises revenue when its performance obligations are satisfied as control of the goods and services is transferred to the client and/or consumers. In certain cases, clients engage the Group to provide food and support services in a single multi-service contract. Revenue is recognised for each separate performance obligation in respect of food and support services as these are provided. There is little judgement involved in determining if a performance obligation has been satisfied. For each performance obligation in a contract, the Group determines whether it is satisfied over time or at a point in time. The Group has determined that most of its performance obligations are satisfied over time as the client simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided as the food and/or support services are rendered at the client site. Generally, where the Group has the obligation to its clients to make available the provision of food service for a predetermined period, its performance obligation represents a series of services delivered over time. Revenue is recognised at the amount which the Group has the right to invoice, where that amount corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Group’s performance completed to date. Where the Group is contracted to sell directly to consumers, for example, in a retail café concession, the performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time, namely when the products are sold to the consumer. The nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows for performance obligations within a contract that are satisfied over time and at a point in time are considered to be similar and they are affected by the same economic factors.
Operating profit is stated after the share of profit after tax of joint ventures and associates, and before finance costs.
Specific adjusting items are disclosed and described separately in the consolidated financial statements where it is necessary to do so to provide further understanding of the financial performance of the Group. Specific adjusting items are material items of income or expense that have been shown separately due to the significance of their nature or amount. Further details are provided in note 34.
| North America £m | Europe £m | Rest of World £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 30 September 2023 | ||||
| Business & Industry | 6,612 | 3,262 | 1,113 | 10,987 |
| Education | 4,486 | 1,014 | 210 | 5,710 |
| Healthcare & Senior Living | 6,077 | 1,107 | 424 | 7,608 |
| Sports & Leisure | 3,609 | 919 | 133 | 4,661 |
| Defence, Offshore & Remote | 308 | 736 | 1,271 | 2,315 |
| Underlying revenue 3,4 | 21,092 | 7,038 | 3,151 | 31,281 |
| Less: Share of revenue of joint ventures | (19) | (234) | – | (253) |
| Revenue | 21,073 | 6,804 | 3,151 | 31,028 |
| Year ended 30 September 2022 | ||||
| Business & Industry | 4,805 | 2,660 | 936 | 8,401 |
| Education | 3,782 | 874 | 173 | 4,829 |
| Healthcare & Senior Living | 5,437 | 1,001 | 404 | 6,842 |
| Sports & Leisure | 2,854 | 738 | 89 | 3,681 |
| Defence, Offshore & Remote | 261 | 662 | 1,095 | 2,018 |
| Underlying revenue 3,4 | 17,139 | 5,935 | 2,697 | 25,771 |
| Less: Share of revenue of joint ventures | (18) | (241) | – | (259) |
| Revenue | 17,121 | 5,694 | 2,697 | 25,512 |
| North America £m | Europe £m | Rest of World £m | Central activities £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 30 September 2023 | |||||
| Underlying operating profit/(loss) before results of joint ventures and associates | 1,638 | 351 | 175 | (98) | 2,066 |
| Add: Share of profit before tax of joint ventures | 1 | 29 | – | – | 30 |
| Add: Share of results of associates | 14 | 12 | – | – | 26 |
| Underlying operating profit/(loss) 1 | 1,653 | 392 | 175 | (98) | 2,122 |
| Less: Acquisition-related charges 2 | (72) | (46) | (7) | – | (125) |
| Less: Charges related to the strategic portfolio review 2 | – | (99) | – | – | (99) |
| Less: One-off pension charge 2 | – | (7) | – | – | (7) |
| Operating profit/(loss) | 1,581 | 240 | 168 | (98) | 1,891 |
| Net gain on sale and closure of businesses 2 | 20 | ||||
| Finance costs | (164) | ||||
| Profit before tax | 1,747 | ||||
| Income tax expense | (429) | ||||
| Profit for the year | 1,318 |
| North America £m | Europe £m | Rest of World £m | Central activities £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 30 September 2022 | |||||
| Underlying operating profit/(loss) before results of joint ventures and associates | 1,226 | 262 | 141 | (86) | 1,543 |
| Add: Share of profit before tax of joint ventures | 1 | 28 | – | – | 29 |
| Add: Share of results of associates | 9 | 9 | – | – | 18 |
| Underlying operating profit/(loss) | 1,236 | 299 | 141 | (86) | 1,590 |
| Less: Acquisition-related charges | (57) | (30) | (4) | (1) | (92) |
| Add /(less): Other | 2 | 4 | (2) | – | 2 |
| Operating profit/(loss) | 1,183 | 267 | 137 | (87) | 1,500 |
| Net loss on sale and closure of businesses | (7) | ||||
| Finance costs | (24) | ||||
| Profit before tax | 1,469 | ||||
| Income tax expense | (352) | ||||
| Profit for the year | 1,117 |
| North America £m | Europe £m | Rest of World £m | Central activities £m | Current and deferred tax £m | Net debt £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 30 September 2023 | |||||||
| Total assets | 9,935 | 4,688 | 1,151 | 638 | 282 | 906 | 17,600 |
| Total liabilities | (4,808) | (1,611) | (784) | (355) | (322) | (4,559) | (12,439) |
| Net assets/(liabilities) | 5,127 | 3,077 | 367 | 283 | (40) | (3,653) | 5,161 |
| Total assets include: Interests in joint ventures and associates | 61 | 183 | – | – | 244 | ||
| Non-current assets¹ | 7,167 | 3,398 | 484 | 618 | 193 | 45 | 11,905 |
| At 30 September 2022 | |||||||
| Total assets | 9,872 | 4,500 | 1,196 | 714 | 336 | 2,130 | 18,748 |
| Total liabilities | (4,768) | (1,512) | (770) | (268) | (405) | (5,120) | (12,843) |
| Net assets/(liabilities) | 5,104 | 2,988 | 426 | 446 | (69) | (2,990) | 5,905 |
| Total assets include: Interests in joint ventures and associates | 84 | 182 | 4 | – | 270 | ||
| Non-current assets¹ | 7,187 | 3,340 | 527 | 703 | 230 | 76 | 12,063 |
| North America £m | Europe £m | Rest of World £m | Central activities £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 30 September 2023 | |||||
| Additions to other intangible assets¹⁰ | 10 | 151 | 35 | 7 | 22 |
| Additions to contract fulfilment assets¹¹ | 298 | 8 | 5 | – | 311 |
| Additions to right-of-use assets¹² | 140 | 77 | 12 | – | 229 |
| Additions to property, plant and equipment¹³ | 214 | 111 | 40 | – | 365 |
| Amortisation of other intangible assets¹¹⁰ | 1 | 10 | 141 | 55 | 10 |
| Amortisation of contract fulfilment assets¹¹ | 225 | 3 | 3 | – | 231 |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets¹² | 78 | 73 | 11 | 1 | 163 |
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment¹³ | 165 | 73 | 37 | 1 | 276 |
| Impairment losses – strategic portfolio review³ | – | 3 | 50 | – | – |
| Impairment losses – goodwill⁹ | – | – | – | 5 | 5 |
| Impairment losses – other non-current assets³ | 10 | – | – | – | 10 |
| Impairment reversals – non-current assets³ | – | (2) | – | – | (2) |
| Other non-cash items² | 2 | 26 | 19 | 9 | 4 |
| Assets held for sale | 27 | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| Year ended 30 September 2022 | |||||
| Additions to other intangible assets¹⁰ | 117 | 26 | 7 | 27 | 177 |
| Additions to contract fulfilment assets¹¹ | 211 | 3 | 4 | – | 218 |
| Additions to right-of-use assets¹² | 63 | 43 | 15 | 1 | 122 |
| Additions to property, plant and equipment¹³ | 166 | 84 | 34 | – | 284 |
| Amortisation of other intangible assets¹¹⁰ | 1 | 10 | 124 | 51 | 11 |
| Amortisation of contract fulfilment assets¹¹ | 208 | 3 | 3 | – | 214 |
| Depreciation of right-of-use assets¹² | 70 | 74 | 11 | 1 | 156 |
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment¹³ | 148 | 74 | 37 | 1 | 260 |
| Impairment losses³ | 5 | 10 | – | – | 15 |
| Impairment reversals³ | – | (2) | – | (2) | (4) |
| Other non-cash items² | 26 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| Assets held for sale | 27 | – | 26 | – | 26 |
| Notes | 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Food and materials | |||
| Cost of inventories consumed | 8,651 | 6,931 | |
| Labour | |||
| Employee remuneration | 4 | 14,426 | 12,163 |
| Overheads | |||
| Commissions and fees paid to clients | 1,379 | 1,054 | |
| Expense relating to short-term leases, low-value assets and variable lease payments | 12 | 148 | 122 |
| Amortisation – other intangible assets | 10 | 110 | 100 |
| Amortisation – contract fulfilment assets | 11 | 231 | 214 |
| Depreciation – right-of-use assets | 12 | 163 | 156 |
| Depreciation – property, plant and equipment | 13 | 276 | 260 |
| Impairment losses – non-current assets | 10 | 15 | |
| Impairment reversals – non-current assets | (2) | (4) | |
| Net impairment losses – trade and other receivables | 16 | 35 | 29 |
| Acquisition-related charges (see below) | 1 | 34 | 125 |
| Charges related to the strategic portfolio review (see below) | 1 | 34 | 99 |
| COVID-19 resizing credit | 1 | – | (4) |
| Audit and non-audit services (see below) | 8 | 7 | |
| Other | 3,534 | 2,922 | |
| Total | 29,193 | 24,057 |
Represent amortisation and impairment charges in respect of intangible assets acquired through business combinations, direct costs incurred through business combinations or other strategic asset acquisitions, business integration costs and changes in consideration in relation to past acquisition activity.
| Notes | 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amortisation – acquisition intangibles | 10 | 100 | 91 |
| Impairment losses – goodwill | 9 | 5 | – |
| Acquisition transaction costs | 27 | 17 | 10 |
| Adjustment to contingent consideration payable on business acquisitions | 3 | (9) | |
| Total | 125 | 92 |
Represent charges in respect of an ongoing strategic review of the Group’s portfolio of non-core activities which, during 2023, relate to site closures and contract renegotiations and terminations in the UK.
| Notes | 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impairment – right-of-use assets | 12 | 44 | – |
| Write-off – other receivables | 21 | – | |
| Onerous contracts and other costs – provisions | 23 | 20 | – |
| Other costs – other payables | 8 | – | |
| Impairment – property, plant and equipment | 13 | 6 | – |
| Total | 99 | – |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Fees payable for the audit of the Company and consolidated financial statements | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Fees payable for the audit of the Company’s subsidiaries and joint ventures | 5.8 | 5.0 |
| Audit services | 7.7 | 6.8 |
| Audit-related assurance | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Non-audit services | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Total | 8.0 | 7.1 |
Average number of employees, including directors and part-time employees
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| North America | 276,378 | 248,937 |
| Europe | 172,198 | 158,503 |
| Rest of World | 113,884 | 106,267 |
| Total | 562,460 | 513,707 |
Aggregate remuneration of all employees, including directors
| Notes | 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 12,276 | 10,285 | |
| Social security costs | 1,868 | 1,645 | |
| Share-based payments | 26 | 44 | |
| Pension costs – defined contribution plans | 24 | 208 | 175 |
| Pension costs – defined benefit plans | 24 | 30 | 24 |
| Total | 14,426 | 12,163 |
In addition to the pension costs shown in operating costs above, there is an interest charge on net post-employment benefit obligations of £9m (2022: £12m).
The remuneration of directors and key management personnel¹ is set out below. Additional information on directors’ and key management remuneration, long-term incentive plans, pension contributions and entitlements can be found in the audited section of the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 97 to 126 and forms part of these accounts.
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Salaries | 8.3 | 7.7 |
| Other short-term employee remuneration | 11.2 | 10.2 |
| Share-based payments | 9.8 | 6.1 |
| Pension salary supplement | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Total | 29.7 | 24.6 |
Finance income and expenses are recognised in the income statement in the period in which they are incurred.
| Notes | 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest on cash and cash equivalents | 43 | 9 | |
| Other | 5 | 2 | |
| Finance income | 48 | 11 | |
| Interest on bank loans and overdrafts | (2) | (3) | |
| Interest on other borrowings | (129) | (68) | |
| Interest on lease liabilities | 12 | (41) | (35) |
| Net present value adjustments | 21, 23 | (12) | (5) |
| Finance expense | (184) | (111) | |
| Net gains on derivative financial instruments in a fair value hedge | 1 | 3 | |
| Net (losses)/gains on derivative financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss | (33) | 70 | |
| Change in fair value of investments at fair value through profit or loss | 15 | (7) | (5) |
| Dividends received from Rabbi Trust investments | 15 | 19 | 20 |
| Interest on net post-employment benefit obligations | 24 | (9) | (12) |
| Other | 1 | ||
| Other financing items | 2 | (28) | 76 |
| Total | (164) | (24) |
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the consolidated income statement except where it relates to items taken directly to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income or equity, in which case it is recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income or equity as appropriate.# 6 Tax
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the period, using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted in respect of that period at the balance sheet date. Tax benefits are recognised if it is probable that these will be accepted by the relevant tax authorities. Subsequently, they are reviewed each year to assess whether provisions against full recognition of the benefits are necessary.
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided using the balance sheet liability method, providing for temporary differences between the carrying a mounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes. Deferred tax liabilities a re generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable p rofits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and li abilities are not recognised if the temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combinat ion) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxabl e profit nor the accounting profit. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associat es, and interests in joint arrangements, except where the Group is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Deferred tax is calculated at the enacted or substantively enacted tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when th e liability is settled or the asset realised. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset against each other when they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax jurisdiction and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
The Group has operations in approximately 35 countries. The tax position in each country is often not agreed with the tax authorities until some time after the relevant period end and, if subject to a tax audit, may be open for an extended period. In these circumstances, the recognition of tax liabilities and assets requires management estimation to reflect a variety of factors, including historical experience, i nterpretations of tax law and the likelihood of settlement. The internatio nal corporate tax environment remains complex and the sustained increase in audit activity from tax authorities means that the potential for tax uncertainties and disputes remains high. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the results in the year in which such determination is made. In addition, th e calculation and recognition of temporary differences giving rise to deferred tax assets requires est imates to be made of the extent to which future taxable profits are available against which these temporary differences can be utilised.
Tax risk can arise from unclear regulations and differences in interpretation but, most significantly, where tax authorities apply diverging standards in assessing intra -group cross-border transactions. The Group has recognised provisions in respect of uncertain tax positions, none of which is individually material. In determining such liabilities, the Group assesses the range of potential outcomes and estim ates whether additional tax may be due. The Group is currently subject to audits and reviews in a number of countries that primarily relate to complex corporate tax issues. In March 2022, the UK tax authority indicated that it may seek to challenge aspects of an intra -group refinancing undertaken in 2013. The challenge relates to the deductibility of interest for UK corporation tax purposes for the period from June 2013 to December 2016 on certain loans which formed part of that refinancing. We have continued discussions with the tax authority and the provision, based on a range of possible outcomes, remains unchanged. Our maximum potential liability is £62m of tax and £17 m of interest. The Canadian Revenue Agency’s enquiry into an intra -group financing arrangement has been resolved during the year consistent with the provision previously held. The Group does not currently anticipate any material changes to the amounts recorded at 30 September 2023.
Consolidated financial statements158 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 159
Deferred tax assets of £193m (2022: £230m) include £84m (2022: £95m) relating to the carry forward of unused tax losses. It is considered probable that sufficient taxable profits over a period of between one and five years will be available against which the unus ed tax losses can be utilised. In evaluating whet her sufficient taxable profits will be available in the future, forecasts have been derived from the most recent three- year strategic plan approved by management adjusted for the effect of applicable tax laws and regulations relevant to those f uture taxabl e profits. No reasonably possible change in any of the key assumptions would result in a significant reduction in projected taxable prof its such that the recognised deferred tax assets would not be realised.
Climate change and the Group’s net zero commitments are not expected to have a material impact on taxable profits over the period during which deferred tax assets are expected to be utilised.
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Current tax | ||
| Current year | 485 | 322 |
| Adjustment in respect of prior years | (39) | 28 |
| Current tax expense | 446 | 350 |
| Deferred tax | ||
| Current year | (10) | 39 |
| Impact of changes in statutory tax rates | (1) | 2 |
| Adjustment in respect of prior years | (6) | (39) |
| Deferred tax (credit)/charge | (17) | 2 |
| Total | 429 | 352 |
The income tax expense for the year is based on the effective UK statutory rate of corporation tax for the period of 22% (2022: 19%). Overseas tax is calculated at the rates prevailing in the respective jurisdictions. The income tax effects of the adjustments between statutory and underlying results are shown in note 34 to the consolidated financial statements.
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 1,747 | 1,469 |
| Notional income tax expense at the effective UK statutory rate of 22% (2022: 19%) on profit before tax | 384 | 279 |
| Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries operating in other jurisdictions | 59 | 69 |
| Impact of changes in statutory tax rates | (1) | 2 |
| Permanent differences | 30 | 11 |
| Tax on profit of joint ventures and associates | – | (1) |
| Losses and other temporary differences not previously recognised | (1) | – |
| Unrelieved current year tax losses | 3 | 3 |
| Prior year items | (45) | (11) |
| Income tax expense | 429 | 352 |
Permanent differences include the current year movement in our estimated liability for uncertain tax positions, the benefit of tax credits and the tax effect of non-deductible expenditure. Prior year items relate to the reassessment of prior year tax estimates and the resolution of open items. The global nature of the Group’s operations gives rise to various factors which could affect the future tax rate. These include the mix of profits, changes to overseas statutory tax rates or tax legislation and the foreign exchange rates applicable when those profits are translated into sterling. The UK government enacted an increase in the UK corporation tax rate from 19% to 25% with effect from 1 April 2023. In addition, the future tax charge may be affected by the impact of acquisitions, disposals or other restructuring activities and the resolution of open issues with tax authorities.
159Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 160
Consolidated financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023 continued
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Current and deferred tax (credit)/charge on actuarial and other movements on post-employment benefits | (43) | 65 |
| Deferred tax charge on change in fair value of financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | 13 | – |
| Current tax credit on foreign exchange movements | (3) | – |
| Total | (33) | 65 |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Current and deferred tax credit on share -based payments | (3) | – |
| Total | (3) | – |
| Tax depreciation £m | Intangibles and contract fulfilment assets £m | Net pensions and post- employment benefits £m | Tax losses £m | Net self-funded insurance provisions £m | Net short-term temporary differences £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2021 | (21) | (382) | 96 | 90 | 72 | 273 | 128 |
| (Charge)/credit to income | (15) | 4 | 6 | 2 | 6 | (5) | (2) |
| Charge to other comprehensive income | – | – | (63) | – | – | – | (63) |
| Business acquisitions | – | (6) | – | – | – | – | (6) |
| Sale and closure of businesses | – | – | – | – | – | (1) | (1) |
| Reclassification | – | (2) | – | – | – | 2 | – |
| Exchange adjustment | (20) | (59) | 31 | 3 | 16 | 43 | 14 |
| At 30 September 2022 | (56) | (445) | 70 | 95 | 94 | 312 | 70 |
| Credit/(charge) to income | 10 | 6 | 8 | (9) | 4 | (2) | 17 |
| Credit/(charge) to other comprehensive income/equity | – | – | 43 | – | – | (12) | 31 |
| Business acquisitions | – | (18) | – | – | – | (1) | (19) |
| Sale and closure of businesses | – | – | – | – | – | (1) | (1) |
| Reclassification | 4 | (2) | – | 1 | – | (3) | – |
| Exchange adjustment | 9 | 33 | (19) | (3) | (8) | (25) | (13) |
| At 30 September 2023 | (33) | (426) | 102 | 84 | 90 | 268 | 85 |
Net short-term temporary differences relate principally to provisions and other liabilities of overseas subsidiaries.## Consolidated financial statements
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets | 193 | 230 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | (108) | (160) |
| Net deferred tax asset | 85 | 70 |
Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of tax losses of £106m (2022: £323m) and other temporary differences of £21m (2022: £21m). Of the unrecognised tax losses, £50m (2022: £269m) will expire at various dates between 2024 and 2032. These deferred tax assets have not been recognised as the timing of recovery is uncertain.
The Group does not recognise any deferred tax liability on temporary differences relating to potentially taxable unremitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries totalling £598m (2022: £636m) because it is able to control the timing of reversal of these differences. It is probable that no reversal will take place in the foreseeable future.
In December 2021, the OECD released a framework for Pillar Two Model Rules which will introduce a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% applicable to multinational enterprise groups with global revenue over €750m. The legislation implementing the rules in the UK will apply from the financial year ending 30 September 2025. The Group is reviewing this legislation and also monitoring the status of implementation of the model rules worldwide. The impact is not expected to be material. The Group has applied the temporary exception under IAS 12 Income Taxes in relation to the accounting for deferred taxes arising from the implementation of the Pillar Two Model Rules.
Basic earnings per share is calculated based on profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders and the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, which excludes shares held in treasury. Diluted earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year adjusted to assume conversion of all the dilutive potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares.
| Profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders | 1,314 | 1,113 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares | 2023 Ordinary shares of 11 ½p each millions | 2022 Ordinary shares of 11 ½p each millions |
|---|---|---|
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic earnings per share | 1,743 | 1,779 |
| Dilutive effect of share-based payment plans | 2 | – |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares for diluted earnings per share | 1,745 | 1,779 |
| Earnings per share | 2023 pence | 2022 pence |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | 75.4p | 62.6p |
| Diluted | 75.3p | 62.6p |
Underlying earnings per share for the year ended 30 September 2023 was 86.1p (2022: 63.0p). Underlying earnings per share is calculated based on earnings excluding the effect of acquisition-related charges, charges related to the strategic portfolio review, COVID-19 resizing credit, one-off pension charge, gains and losses on sale and closure of businesses and other financing items, together with the tax attributable to these amounts (see note 34).
Interim dividends are recognised in the financial statements when they are paid. Final dividends, which are subject to approval by the shareholders in a general meeting after the balance sheet date, are not included as a liability in the financial statements. Instead, they are disclosed as a post-balance sheet event and recognised in the financial statements when they are approved (see note 33).
A final dividend in respect of 2023 of 28.1p per share, £482m in aggregate ¹, has been proposed, giving a total dividend in respect of 2023 of 43.1p per share (2022: 31.5p per share). The proposed final dividend is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 8 February 2024.
| Dividends on ordinary shares | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends per share pence | £m | |
| Amounts recognised as distributions to equity shareholders during the year | ||
| Final 2021 | – | – |
| Interim 2022 | – | – |
| Final 2022 | 22.1 | 387 |
| Interim 2023 | 15.0 | 261 |
| Total | 37.1 | 648 |
¹ Based on the number of ordinary shares in issue at 30 September 2023 excluding shares held in treasury and the Compass Group PLC All Share Schemes Trust (1,715m shares).
Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and is carried at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating units (CGUs) or groups of CGUs that are expected to benefit from the acquisition which is usually the geographical location of the operations of the Group. Goodwill is subsequently monitored and tested for impairment at the level at which it is allocated. Gains and losses on the disposal of businesses take account of the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the business sold, allocated where necessary on the basis of relative fair value, unless another method is determined to be more appropriate.
The recoverable amount of a CGU is determined based on value-in-use calculations. If the recoverable amount of a CGU is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognised in the consolidated income statement which is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the CGU and then to the other assets of the CGU pro rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the CGU. An impairment loss recognised in respect of goodwill is not subsequently reversed.
The value in use of the UK CGU is estimated for the purposes of impairment testing based on assumptions, including the most recent three-year strategic plan approved by management, long-term growth rates and discount rates. A reasonably possible change in the assumptions used to derive this estimate could have a material effect on the carrying amount of goodwill in the UK CGU in the next 12 months. The key assumptions used in the value-in-use calculations, together with sensitivity analysis, are set out below.
The potential impact of climate change and the Group’s net zero commitments on forecast cash flows beyond the Group’s three-year planning period has been considered during impairment testing by including in the sensitivity analysis assumptions consistent with the quantitative scenario analysis performed for the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (see pages 51 and 52).
| Goodwill | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| At 1 October | 5,664 | 5,058 |
| Business acquisitions | 184 | 122 |
| Sale and closure of businesses | (27) | (5) |
| Currency adjustment | (292) | 489 |
| At 30 September | 5,529 | 5,664 |
| Impairment | ||
| At 1 October | 545 | 508 |
| Impairment | 5 | – |
| Currency adjustment | (23) | 37 |
| At 30 September | 527 | 545 |
| Net carrying amount | ||
| At 30 September | 5,002 | 5,119 |
| Goodwill by business segment | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| US | 2,367 | 2,498 |
| Canada | 217 | 219 |
| North America | 2,584 | 2,717 |
| UK ¹ | 1,538 | 1,481 |
| Finland | 124 | 125 |
| Other | 493 | 506 |
| Europe | 2,155 | 2,112 |
| Japan | 95 | 107 |
| Other | 168 | 183 |
| Rest of World | 263 | 290 |
| Total | 5,002 | 5,119 |
¹ Includes £1.3bn which arose in 2000 on the Granada transaction.
The key assumptions used in the value-in-use calculations are operating cash flow forecasts from the most recent three-year strategic plan approved by management adjusted to remove the expected benefits of future restructuring activities and improvements to assets, externally-derived long-term growth rates and pre-tax discount rates. The strategic plan is based on expectations of future outcomes taking into account past experience, adjusted for anticipated revenue growth, from both new business and like-for-like growth, and taking into consideration macroeconomic and geopolitical factors, including the impact of inflation.
Cash flows beyond the three-year period covered by the plan are extrapolated using estimated growth rates based on local expected economic conditions and do not exceed the long-term average growth rate for the country. Cash flow forecasts for a period of up to five years are used by exception to reflect the medium-term prospects of the business if the initial level of headroom in the impairment test for a country is low, with cash flows beyond five years extrapolated using estimated growth rates that do not exceed the long-term average growth rate for that country.
The pre-tax discount rates are based on the Group’s Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) adjusted for specific risks relating to the country in which the CGU operates. The beta and gearing ratio assumptions used in the calculation of the Group’s WACC represent market participant measures based on the averages of a number of companies with similar assets.
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Growth and discount rates | ||
| Long-term growth rates | Pre-tax discount rates | |
| US | 2.1% | 11.3% |
| Canada | 2.1% | 11.8% |
| UK | 2.1% | 11.7% |
| Finland | 2.0% | 9.4% |
| Rest of Europe ¹ | 1.2% | 16.4% |
| Japan | 1.0% | 10.6% |
| Rest of World | 1.8% | 10.6% |
¹ Rest of Europe includes Türkiye which has residual growth rate and pre-tax discount rate assumptions of 16.4% (2022: 14.4%) and 31.3% (2022: 27.5%), respectively.# Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
10 Other intangible assets
Significant accounting policy
Acquisition intangibles
Intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination are capitalised at fair value at the date of acquisition and mainly relate to client contracts and brands.
Client contract intangibles
Client contract intangibles are capitalised at cost and relate to payments made to clients, typically at the start of a contract, to obtain the right to generate significant consumer revenue through the provision of food services at the client site.
Computer software
Software licences acquired for use by the Group are capitalised at cost, including the cost of purchasing the licence and the directly attributable cost of bringing the software application to use. Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) arrangements are service contracts providing the Group with the right to access the cloud provider’s software over the contract period. As such, the Group does not receive a software intangible asset at the contract commencement date. Implementation services are assessed to determine whether they are distinct from the underlying use of the software. Where implementation services are not distinct, the cost is expensed as incurred. Where implementation services are distinct, an intangible asset is recognised if it satisfies the conditions for recognition as an intangible asset in accordance with IAS 38 Intangible Assets, otherwise the cost is expensed as incurred.
Trademarks and licences
Trademarks and licences are capitalised at cost.
Amortisation and impairment
The method of amortisation reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the asset are expected to be consumed. The following methods are applied:
– acquisition intangibles: straight line over the life of the contract, including the renewal period where appropriate. The typical useful lives range from 2 to 20 years.
– client contract intangibles: straight line over the life of the contract. The typical useful lives range from 3 to 5 years.
– computer software: straight line or a method which better reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the asset are expected to be consumed. The typical useful lives range from 3 to 10 years.
– trademarks and licences: straight line over the term of the trademark or licence.
Other intangible assets are tested for impairment if there are any indicators of impairment.
Climate change
In the event that there are indicators of impairment in respect of long-life acquisition intangibles, the potential impact of climate change and the Group’s net zero commitments on forecast cash flows beyond the Group’s three-year planning period is considered during impairment testing by including in the sensitivity analysis assumptions consistent with the quantitative scenario analysis performed for the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (see pages 51 and 52).
164 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
165 Consolidated financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023 continued
10 Other intangible assets continued
| Other intangible assets | Acquisition intangibles £m | Client contract intangibles £m | Computer software £m | Trademarks and licences £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | |||||
| At 1 October 2021 | 1,447 | 661 | 487 | 5 | 2,600 |
| Additions | – | 36 | 140 | 1 | 177 |
| Disposals | (6) | (10) | (15) | (1) | (32) |
| Business acquisitions | 140 | – | – | – | 140 |
| Sale and closure of businesses | (1) | – | – | – | (1) |
| Reclassification | – | – | 6 | – | 6 |
| Currency adjustment | 205 | 114 | 52 | 1 | 372 |
| At 30 September 2022 | 1,785 | 801 | 670 | 6 | 3,262 |
| Additions | – | 84 | 130 | 1 | 215 |
| Disposals | (3) | (19) | (10) | – | (32) |
| Business acquisitions | 221 | – | – | – | 221 |
| Sale and closure of businesses | (18) | (2) | (6) | – | (26) |
| Reclassification | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Currency adjustment | (121) | (70) | (29) | – | (220) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 1,864 | 795 | 756 | 8 | 3,423 |
| Amortisation | |||||
| At 1 October 2021 | 404 | 288 | 287 | 4 | 983 |
| Charge for the year | 91 | 59 | 41 | – | 191 |
| Impairment | – | – | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Disposals | (6) | (8) | (12) | (1) | (27) |
| Reclassification | – | – | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| Currency adjustment | 62 | 53 | 30 | – | 145 |
| At 30 September 2022 | 551 | 392 | 353 | 6 | 1,302 |
| Charge for the year | 100 | 61 | 48 | 1 | 210 |
| Impairment | – | 8 | – | – | 8 |
| Disposals | (2) | (18) | (7) | – | (27) |
| Sale and closure of businesses | (5) | (2) | (2) | – | (9) |
| Reclassification | – | 1 | (1) | – | – |
| Currency adjustment | (41) | (35) | (17) | – | (93) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 603 | 407 | 374 | 7 | 1,391 |
| Net book value | |||||
| At 30 September 2022 | 1,234 | 409 | 317 | – | 1,960 |
| At 30 September 2023 | 1,261 | 388 | 382 | 1 | 2,032 |
165 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
166 Consolidated financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023 continued
11 Contract balances
Significant accounting policy
Contract fulfilment assets
Costs incurred in the fulfilment of the Group’s obligations to the client under the contract include contributions towards service assets, such as kitchen and restaurant fit-out costs and equipment, which are capitalised as contract fulfilment assets. Contract fulfilment assets originate when payments are made, normally up front at the start of the client contract, that provide enhanced resources to the Group over the contract term. Contract fulfilment costs covered within the scope of another accounting standard, such as property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, are not capitalised as contract fulfilment assets, but are treated according to other standards.
Costs to obtain contracts
Costs incurred during the bidding period, prior to a contract being awarded, are expensed to the income statement. Costs incurred in securing the contract after preferred bidder status has been obtained are generally expensed as incurred, unless they fulfil the conditions for capitalisation as an asset. The incremental costs to obtain a contract with a customer, such as commissions to the salesforce, are capitalised if it is expected that those costs will be recoverable. Only commissions directly attributable to an individual contract award are capitalised, while commissions payable due to multiple contract wins or due to a portfolio of client contracts are expensed as incurred as they cannot be directly attributable to an identified contract. Costs to obtain contracts that would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract was obtained are recognised as an expense in the period.
Amortisation and impairment
Contract fulfilment assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the life of the client contract and the useful economic life of the assets. The amortisation charge is included in operating costs. Capitalised costs to obtain contracts are unwound over the life of the client contract as an expense. Contract fulfilment assets and capitalised costs to obtain contracts are reviewed annually to identify indicators of impairment. Whenever impairment indicators exist, the Group determines the recoverability of the contract fulfilment assets and capitalised costs to obtain contracts by comparing their carrying amount to the remaining amount of consideration that the Group expects to receive less the costs that relate to providing services under the relevant contract.# Consolidated financial statements
The following table provides information about contract costs, assets and liabilities from contracts with customers and other contract-related balances.
| Contract balances | Notes | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract costs | |||
| Contract fulfilment assets | 991 | 1,024 | |
| Costs to obtain contracts | 87 | 82 | |
| Costs to obtain and fulfil contracts | 1,078 | 1,106 | |
| Contract assets | |||
| Accrued income | 16 | 408 | 362 |
| Contract liabilities | |||
| Deferred income | 22 | (452) | (475) |
| Other contract balances | |||
| Contract prepayments | 16 | 145 | 141 |
| Trade receivables | 16 | 3,059 | 2,939 |
| Net contract balances | 4,238 | 4,073 |
The Group’s accrued and deferred income balances solely relate to revenue from contracts with customers. The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. Accrued income typically arises where the timing of the related billing cycle occurs in a period after the performance obligation is satisfied and is recognised as a contract asset. Deferred income generally arises as a result of upfront payments under client contracts, including prepaid customer cards, and is recognised as contract liabilities, which are released over the term of the contract as revenue is recognised. Generally, such contract liabilities are recognised as revenue within 12 months. Movements during the year were driven by transactions entered into by the Group within the normal course of business.
Contract fulfilment assets relate to contributions towards assets that the Group uses in the performance of its obligations in its contracts with clients.
| Contract fulfilment assets | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| At 1 October | 1,024 | 866 |
| Additions | 311 | 218 |
| Derecognition | (24) | (13) |
| Amortisation charge for the year | (231) | (214) |
| Impairment | – | (3) |
| Reclassification | (2) | (1) |
| Currency adjustment | (87) | 171 |
| At 30 September | 991 | 1,024 |
No impairment losses were recognised on contract fulfilment assets during the year (2022: £3m). With the exception of contract fulfilment assets, cash payments in respect of contract balances are classified as cash flows from operating activities. There is a significant judgement in respect of the classification of cash payments relating to contract fulfilment assets in the cash flow statement. The Group classifies additions to contract fulfilment assets as cash flows from investing activities as they arise from cash payments in relation to assets that will generate long-term economic benefits. During the year, the purchase of contract fulfilment assets in cash flows from investing activities was £311m (2022: £218m).
At the inception of a contract, the Group assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Control is conveyed where the Group has both the right to direct the identified asset’s use and to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from that use. The Group allocates the consideration in the contract to each lease and non-lease component. The non-lease component, where it is separately identifiable, is not included in the right-of-use asset. When a contract is or contains a lease, the Group recognises a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability at the lease commencement date with respect to all lease arrangements in which it is the lessee, except for leases of low-value assets with an initial fair value less than approximately £5,000 and short-term leases of 12 months or less. For these leases, the lease payments are charged to the income statement as an operating expense on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. The lease term is the non-cancellable period beginning at the contract commencement date plus periods covered by an option to extend the lease, if it is reasonably certain that the Group will exercise the option, and periods covered by an option to terminate the lease, if it is reasonably certain that the Group will not exercise this option.
The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, comprising the initial lease liability adjusted for any lease payments already made, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of restoration costs, less any lease incentives received.
The right-of-use asset is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the underlying asset. The estimated useful lives of right-of-use assets are determined on the same basis as those of property, plant and equipment. The right-of-use asset is tested for impairment if there are any indicators of impairment.
The lease liability is measured at the present value of the lease payments that are reasonably certain and not paid at the commencement date, discounted at the incremental borrowing rate specific to the term, country and start date of the lease. The lease liability is subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The lease liability is remeasured, with a corresponding adjustment to the right-of-use asset, by discounting the revised lease payments as follows:
– using the initial discount rate at the commencement of the lease when lease payments change as a result of changes to residual value guarantees and changes in an index other than a floating interest rate
– using a revised discount rate when lease payments change as a result of the Group’s reassessment of whether it is reasonably certain to exercise a purchase, extension or termination option, changes in the lease term or as a result of a change in floating interest rates
Variable lease payments that are not included in the measurement of the lease liability are recognised in the consolidated income statement in the period in which the event or condition that triggers payment occurs.
Information regarding leases for which the Group is a lessee is provided below. The Group does not have any material arrangements where it acts as a lessor. The Group’s lease portfolio consists of office premises, concession rentals and other assets, such as catering equipment, vending machines and motor vehicles. Lease terms are negotiated on an individual basis and contain a broad range of terms and conditions. Some lease agreements contain variable payments that are not linked to an index or rate, but are based on the performance of the underlying asset. The variable payments depend on sales and, consequently, on overall economic developments over the next few years. Variable payment terms are used to link rental payments to cash flows and reduce fixed costs. The Group does not expect any significant changes in the overall ratio of the variable payments to the Group’s entire lease portfolio. Extension and termination options are included in a number of lease agreements and provide the Group with operational flexibility. These options are assessed at contract commencement as to whether they are reasonably certain to be exercised and are reassessed if a significant event or change in circumstances occurs which is in the control of the Group.
| Right-of-use assets | Land and buildings £m | Plant and machinery £m | Fixtures and fittings £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2021 | 547 | 210 | 2 | 759 |
| Additions | 64 | 57 | 1 | 122 |
| Amendments¹ | 1 | 20 | (1) | 19 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | (100) | (54) | (2) | (156) |
| Impairment | (4) | – | – | (4) |
| Impairment reversal | 3 | – | – | 3 |
| Business acquisitions | 7 | – | – | 7 |
| Reclassification | (1) | (5) | – | (6) |
| Currency adjustment | 42 | 35 | – | 77 |
| At 30 September 2022 | 578 | 242 | 1 | 821 |
| Additions | 127 | 101 | 1 | 229 |
| Amendments¹ | 1 | 35 | 1 | 36 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | (103) | (59) | (1) | (163) |
| Impairment – strategic portfolio review (see note 3) | (44) | – | – | (44) |
| Impairment – other | (1) | – | – | (1) |
| Sale and closure of businesses | (3) | (5) | – | (8) |
| Reclassification | (3) | (11) | – | (14) |
| Currency adjustment | (25) | (18) | – | (43) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 561 | 251 | 1 | 813 |
¹ Amendments include lease terminations, modifications, reassessments and extensions to existing lease agreements.
| Lease liabilities | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Current | 194 | 194 |
| Non-current | 751 | 719 |
| Total | 945 | 913 |
A maturity analysis of contractual undiscounted cash flows relating to lease liabilities is presented in note 20.
| Amounts recognised in the income statement | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Leases of low-value assets, excluding short-term leases of low-value assets | 44 | 37 |
| Short-term leases | 88 | 69 |
| COVID-19 rent concessions | – | (2) |
| Variable lease payments | 16 | 18 |
| Expense relating to short-term leases, low-value assets and variable lease payments | 148 | 122 |
| Depreciation expense of right-of-use assets | 163 | 156 |
| Impairment – strategic portfolio review (see note 3) | 44 | – |
| Impairment – other | 1 | 4 |
| Impairment reversal | – | (3) |
| Interest on lease liabilities | 41 | 35 |
| Total | 397 | 314 |
The Group had total cash outflows for leases of £217m (2022: £187m), comprising £41m (2022: £35m) of interest in cash flow from operating activities and £176m (2022: £152m) of principal in cash flow from financing activities.
The Group has various non-cancellable lease contracts that had not yet commenced at 30 September 2023. The future lease payments for these non-cancellable lease contracts are £2m within one year (2022: £3m), £13m between one and five years (2022: £15m) and £21m thereafter (2022: £18m).# Consolidated financial statements
Significant accounting policy
Freehold land is carried at cost and is not depreciated. All other property, plant and equipment assets are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any recognised impairment in value. When assets are sold, the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the assets is recognised in the consolidated income statement.
Depreciation and impairment
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the anticipated useful lives of the assets. The following rates are applied for the Group: freehold buildings: 2% per annum; plant and machinery: 8% to 33% per annum; and fixtures and fittings: 8% to 33% per annum. Property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment if there are any indicators of impairment.
| Property, plant and equipment | Land and buildings £m | Plant and machinery £m | Fixtures and fittings £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||||
| At 1 October 2021 | 361 | 1,609 | 746 | 2,716 |
| Additions | 15 | 198 | 71 | 284 |
| Disposals | (21) | (141) | (45) | (207) |
| Business acquisitions | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Sale and closure of businesses | – | (1) | (1) | (2) |
| Reclassification | 3 | 11 | 2 | 16 |
| Currency adjustment | 40 | 205 | 50 | 295 |
| At 30 September 2022 | 399 | 1,886 | 824 | 3,109 |
| Additions | 27 | 248 | 90 | 365 |
| Disposals | (25) | (142) | (52) | (219) |
| Business acquisitions | 5 | 17 | 1 | 23 |
| Sale and closure of businesses | (3) | (56) | (14) | (73) |
| Reclassification | 2 | 13 | 2 | 17 |
| Currency adjustment | (29) | (124) | (34) | (187) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 376 | 1,842 | 817 | 3,035 |
| Depreciation | ||||
| At 1 October 2021 | 216 | 1,103 | 562 | 1,881 |
| Charge for the year | 23 | 167 | 70 | 260 |
| Impairment | – | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Impairment reversal | – | (1) | – | (1) |
| Disposals | (18) | (127) | (43) | (188) |
| Sale and closure of businesses | – | – | (1) | (1) |
| Reclassification | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
| Currency adjustment | 24 | 130 | 42 | 196 |
| At 30 September 2022 | 248 | 1,277 | 636 | 2,161 |
| Charge for the year | 22 | 186 | 68 | 276 |
| Impairment – strategic portfolio review (see note 3) | – | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Impairment – other | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Impairment reversal | – | (2) | – | (2) |
| Disposals | (16) | (115) | (59) | (190) |
| Sale and closure of businesses | (3) | (41) | (11) | (55) |
| Reclassification | (1) | 5 | – | 4 |
| Currency adjustment | (17) | (78) | (26) | (121) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 233 | 1,235 | 612 | 2,080 |
| Net book value | ||||
| At 30 September 2022 | 151 | 609 | 188 | 948 |
| At 30 September 2023 | 143 | 607 | 205 | 955 |
Significant accounting policy
Joint arrangements are entities in which the Group holds an interest on a long-term basis and which are jointly controlled by the Group and other entities under a contractual agreement. The Group accounts for its own share of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses measured according to the terms of the agreements covering joint operations. A joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. An associate is an undertaking that is not a subsidiary or joint arrangement over which the Group has significant influence and can participate in financial and operating policy decisions. Joint ventures and associates are accounted for using the equity method. The consolidated income statement includes the Group’s share of the results of joint ventures and associates and the consolidated balance sheet includes the Group’s share of their net assets. Investments in associates include goodwill identified on acquisition and are carried in the consolidated balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of the net assets of the associate, less any impairment in value.
| Interests in joint ventures and associates | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Net book value | ||
| At 1 October | 270 | 256 |
| Additions | 7 | 28 |
| Step acquisitions | (24) | – |
| Share of results of joint ventures | 30 | 27 |
| Share of results of associates | 26 | 18 |
| Transfer to held for sale | 1 | |
| Dividends received | (5) | (27) |
| Currency adjustment | (49) | (51) |
| At 30 September | (11) | 19 |
| Comprised of | 244 | 270 |
| Interests in joint ventures | 85 | 85 |
| Interests in associates | 159 | 185 |
| Total | 244 | 270 |
Significant interests in joint ventures and associates measured using the equity method are as follows:
| Significant joint ventures and associates | Carrying amount Interest Holding % | Principal place of business | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twickenham Experience Limited | Associate 40% | UK | 79 | 79 |
| Abu Dhabi National Hotels Compass Middle East LLC | Joint venture 50% | UAE | 65 | 73 |
Significant accounting policy
Other investments comprising debt and equity instruments are recognised at fair value plus direct transaction costs. Debt instruments are classified at fair value through other comprehensive income. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognised directly in other comprehensive income, except for impairment gains or losses, interest income and foreign exchange gains and losses, which are recognised in the income statement. When the debt instrument is derecognised, cumulative amounts in other comprehensive income are reclassified to the income statement. Equity investments have been irrevocably designated at fair value through other comprehensive income. Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognised directly in other comprehensive income, and are not subsequently reclassified to the Group income statement, including on derecognition. Impairment losses are not recognised separately from other changes in fair value. Dividends are recognised in the consolidated income statement when the Group’s right to receive payment is established. Other investments that are not equity investments, whose cash flows are not solely principal and interest or are not held in order to collect contractual cash flows, are classified and measured at fair value through profit and loss. Investments are included in non-current assets unless management intends to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
| Other investments | Notes | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net book value | |||
| At 1 October | 790 | 166 | |
| Additions | 3 | 42 | |
| Transfer from post-employment benefit obligations | 24 | ||
| Disposals | (3) | (3) | |
| Change in fair value of investments at fair value through other comprehensive income | 94 | (133) | |
| Change in fair value of investments at fair value through profit or loss | 5 | (7) | |
| Rabbi Trust contributions | 1 | (5) | (5) |
| Rabbi Trust benefits paid | 1 | 74 | 61 |
| Dividends received from Rabbi Trust investments | 1 | (44) | (44) |
| Currency adjustment | 5 | 19 | |
| At 30 September | (66) | 140 | |
| Comprised of | 860 | 790 | |
| Rabbi Trust investments | 1 | 623 | 566 |
| Mutual fund investments | 2 | 48 | 52 |
| Life insurance policies | 2 | 29 | 33 |
| Trade investments | 3 | 148 | 127 |
| Other investments | 12 | 12 | |
| Total | 860 | 790 |
Significant accounting policy
The carrying value of all trade receivables is recorded at amortised cost and reduced by provisions for impairment, which are measured at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses. In determining credit risk, the Group considers reasonable and supportable information that is relevant and available without undue cost or effort. This includes both quantitative and qualitative information and analysis based on the Group’s historical experience and forward-looking information.
| Trade and other receivables | Current £m | Non-current £m | Total £m | Current £m | Non-current £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 3,059 | – | 3,059 | 2,939 | – | 2,939 |
| Accrued income | 408 | – | 408 | 362 | – | 362 |
| Prepayments – contract | 26 | 119 | 145 | 35 | 106 | 141 |
| Prepayments – other | 134 | 3 | 137 | 153 | 3 | 156 |
| Deferred consideration receivable on business disposals | 1 | 59 | 60 | – | 10 | 10 |
| Other | 2 | 542 | 544 | 499 | 43 | 542 |
| Total | 4,174 | 253 | 4,427 | 3,988 | 162 | 4,150 |
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is calculated using either the weighted average price or the first in, first out method as appropriate to the circumstances. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses. Agreed discounts relating to inventories are credited to the income statement in cost of sales as the goods are consumed. Rebates relating to items purchased, but still held at the balance sheet date, are deducted from the carrying value of these items so that the cost of inventories is recorded net of applicable rebates.
| Inventories | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Net book value | ||
| At 1 October | 511 | 327 |
| Business acquisitions | 11 | 6 |
| Sale and closure of businesses | (9) | – |
| Net movement | 97 | 122 |
| Currency adjustment | (43) | 56 |
| At 30 September | 567 | 511 |
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and in hand, money market funds and short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and overdrafts are presented on a net basis in cash and cash equivalents when the Group has a legally enforceable right to set off the balances and it regularly settles the balances on a net basis. Bank overdrafts classified as borrowings (see note 19) are an integral part of the Group’s cash management and are included in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated cash flow statement.
| Cash and cash equivalents by type | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 313 | 429 |
| Short-term bank deposits | 112 | 1,080 |
| Money market funds | 418 | 474 |
| Total | 843 | 1,983 |
| Cash and cash equivalents by currency | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Sterling | 574 | 1,473 |
| US dollar | 38 | 193 |
| Euro | 37 | 50 |
| Japanese yen | 6 | 7 |
| Other | 188 | 260 |
| Total | 843 | 1,983 |
The Group’s policy to manage the credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents is set out in note 20. The book value of cash and cash equivalents represents the maximum credit exposure.
The Group has an agreement with a bank counterparty such that, following each quarter end, all balances are net settled simultaneously to a single sterling value which is transferred to the sterling bank account of Compass Group PLC and included in cash and cash equivalents at the balance sheet date. The cash and overdraft figures before netting are shown in the table below:
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross £m | Offset £m | Net £m | Gross £m | Offset £m | Net £m | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,399 | (556) | 843 | 2,378 | (395) | 1,983 |
| Bank overdrafts | (719) | 556 | (163) | (646) | 395 | (251) |
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated at amortised cost unless they are part of a fair value hedge accounting relationship. Borrowings that are part of a fair value hedge accounting relationship are measured at amortised cost adjusted for the fair value attributable to the risk being hedged.
| Borrowings by type | Nominal value | Redeemable | Interest | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurobond €500m Jan 2023 | 1.88% | – | 439 | ||
| US Private Placement $352m Oct 2023 | 4.12% | 288 | 310 | ||
| Eurobond €750m Jul 2024 | 0.63% | 633 | 632 | ||
| US Private Placement $100m Dec 2024 | 3.54% | 82 | 89 | ||
| Eurobond £250m Sep 2025 | 2.00% | 231 | 220 | ||
| US Private Placement $300m Sep 2025 | 3.81% | 235 | 259 | ||
| Eurobond £250m Jun 2026 | 3.85% | 249 | 249 | ||
| US Private Placement $300m Dec 2026 | 3.64% | 246 | 269 | ||
| Eurobond €500m Sep 2028 | 1.50% | 375 | 380 | ||
| Eurobond £300m Jul 2029 | 2.00% | 245 | 233 | ||
| Eurobond €500m Mar 2030 | 3.00% | 398 | 412 | ||
| Eurobond £250m Sep 2032 | 4.38% | 222 | 218 | ||
| Issued debt | 3,204 | 3,710 | |||
| Bank loans | 3 | 3 | |||
| Bank overdrafts | 163 | 251 | |||
| Total | 3,370 | 3,964 | |||
| Comprised of | |||||
| Current | 1,087 | 693 | |||
| Non-current | 2,283 | 3,271 | |||
| Total | 3,370 | 3,964 |
The US Private Placements and Eurobonds are shown net of unamortised issue costs. The Group adjusts the carrying values of the US Private Placements and Eurobonds that are designated in effective fair value hedge relationships for fair value gains and losses (based on observable market inputs) attributable to the risk being hedged. Interest on bank overdrafts is at the relevant money market rates.
| Borrowings by maturity | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Within 1 year, or on demand | 1,087 | 693 |
| Between 1 and 2 years | 548 | 942 |
| Between 2 and 3 years | 249 | 568 |
| Between 3 and 4 years | 246 | 249 |
| Between 4 and 5 years | 375 | 269 |
| In more than 5 years | 865 | 1,243 |
| Total | 3,370 | 3,964 |
| Borrowings by currency | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Sterling | 948 | 920 |
| US dollar | 1,008 | 1,175 |
| Euro | 1,406 | 1,863 |
| Other | 8 | 6 |
| Total | 3,370 | 3,964 |
The US Private Placement (USPP) notes contain financial covenants which consist of a leverage covenant test and an interest cover covenant test which are tested semi-annually at 31 March and 30 September. The leverage covenant test stipulates that net debt after adjustments (including removal of leases, derivatives and fair value adjustments) must be less than or equal to 3.5 times underlying EBITDA after adjustments (including non-underlying items, depreciation on right-of-use assets and lease interest) and can be increased to 4 times without breach for a limited period of time following a material acquisition and subject to a coupon step up being paid. The interest cover covenant test stipulates that underlying EBITDA after adjustments (including non-underlying items, depreciation on right-of-use assets and lease interest) must be more than or equal to 3 times net finance costs after adjustments (including removal of lease interest and other financing items) and can be reduced to 2.5 times without breach for a limited period of time following a material acquisition and subject to a coupon step up being paid.
| Covenant requirement ¹ | Ratio ² | Covenant ratio ³ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||
| Leverage covenant | <=3.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| Interest cover covenant | >=3 | 21.8 | 23.7 | 27.6 |
¹ Can be exceeded by 0.5 for three consecutive reporting periods following a material acquisition and subject to a coupon step up being paid.
² Calculated using Alternative Performance Measures (see note 34). The leverage ratio reflects net debt divided by underlying EBITDA. The interest cover ratio reflects underlying EBITDA divided by underlying net finance costs.
³ Calculated using Alternative Performance Measures (see note 34) and adjusted as per the USPP agreements.
The Group uses derivative financial instruments, such as forward currency contracts and interest rate swaps, to hedge the risks associated with changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Such derivative financial instruments are initially measured at fair value on the contract date and are remeasured to fair value at subsequent reporting dates. The use of financial derivatives is governed by the Group’s policies approved by the Board that provide written principles on the use of financial derivatives consistent with the Group’s risk management strategy. The Group does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. The fair value of forward currency contracts is calculated by reference to current forward exchange rates for contracts with similar maturity profiles. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined by reference to market values for similar instruments. For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as either fair value hedges when they hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognised asset or liability or an unrecognised firm commitment, or net investment hedges where they hedge the exposure to foreign currency arising from a net investment in foreign operations. On adoption of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, the Group elected to continue to apply hedge accounting guidance in IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
In relation to fair value hedges which meet the conditions for hedge accounting, any gain or loss from remeasuring the hedging instrument at fair value is recognised immediately in the consolidated income statement.
The ageing of gross trade receivables and of the provision for impairment is as follows:
| 2023 Trade receivables | 2022 Trade receivables | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet due £m | 0-3 months overdue £m | 3-6 months overdue £m | 6-12 months overdue £m | Over 12 months overdue £m | Total £m | Not yet due £m | 0-3 months overdue £m | 3-6 months overdue £m | 6-12 months overdue £m | Over 12 months overdue £m | Total £m | |
| Expected loss rate | 1% | 3% | 33% | 89% | 74% | 3% | – | 4% | 28% | 100% | 85% | 3% |
| Gross | 2,590 | 441 | 64 | 18 | 39 | 3,152 | 2,434 | 489 | 54 | 17 | 41 | 3,035 |
| Provision | (14) | (13) | (21) | (16) | (29) | (93) | (11) | (18) | (15) | (17) | (35) | (96) |
| Total | 2,576 | 428 | 43 | 2 | 10 | 3,059 | 2,423 | 471 | 39 | – | 6 | 2,939 |
Movements in the provision for impairment of trade and other receivables are as follows:
| Provision for impairment of trade and other receivables | 2023 Trade £m | 2023 Other £m | 2023 Total £m | 2022 Trade £m | 2022 Other £m | 2022 Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October | 96 | 53 | 149 | 77 | 43 | 120 |
| Charged to income statement | 36 | 14 | 50 | 28 | 9 | 37 |
| Credited to income statement | (8) | (7) | (15) | (5) | (3) | (8) |
| Utilised | (25) | (13) | (38) | (21) | (1) | (22) |
| Sale and closure of business | (1) | – | (1) | – | – | – |
| Reclassification | 2 | (1) | 1 | 9 | – | 9 |
| Currency adjustment | (7) | (1) | (8) | 8 | 5 | 13 |
| At 30 September | 93 | 45 | 138 | 96 | 53 | 149 |
Trade receivable days at 30 September 2023 were 41 days (2022: 38 days on a constant-currency basis).Any gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk is adjusted against the carrying amount of the hedged item and recognised in the consolidated income statement. Where the adjustment is to an unrecognised firm commitment, an asset or liability is recognised on the balance sheet. When the hedged transaction occurs, that asset or liability is recognised in the initial measurement of the acquisition cost and carrying amount of the asset or liability. Where the adjustment is to the carrying amount of a hedged interest-bearing financial instrument, the adjustment is amortised to the net profit and loss such that it is fully amortised by maturity. When fair value hedge accounting is discontinued, any adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item for the designated risk for interest-bearing financial instruments is amortised to profit or loss, with amortisation commencing no later than when the hedged item ceases to be adjusted.
The Group uses foreign currency-denominated debt, forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps to partially hedge against the change in the sterling value of its foreign currency denominated net assets due to movements in foreign exchange rates. The Group designates these as a hedge of its net investments in foreign operations and recognises the gains or losses on the retranslation of the borrowings in other comprehensive income. If the Group uses derivatives as the hedging instrument, the effective portion of the hedge is recognised in other comprehensive income, with any ineffective portion being recognised immediately in the income statement. Exchange differences arising from a monetary item receivable from or payable to a Group foreign operation, the settlement of which is neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future, are considered to form part of a net investment in a foreign operation and are recognised directly in equity in the translation reserve. Gains and losses accumulated in other comprehensive income are recycled through the consolidated income statement on disposal of the foreign operation. For derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, any gains or losses arising from changes in fair value are taken directly to the consolidated income statement in the period. Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting.
177
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
178
Consolidated financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023 continued
20 Financial risk management continued
The Group’s financial instruments comprise cash, borrowings, receivables and payables that are used to finance the Group’s operations. The Group also uses derivatives, principally interest rate swaps, forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps, to manage interest rate and currency risks arising from the Group’s operations. The Group does not trade in financial instruments. The Group’s treasury policies are designed to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates and exchange rates and to manage the Group’s financial risks. The Board approves any changes to the policies.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group may not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group finances its operations through cash generated by the business and borrowings from a number of sources, including banking institutions, the public and the private placement markets. The Group has developed long-term relationships with a number of financial counterparties with the balance sheet strength and credit quality to provide credit facilities as required. The Group seeks to avoid a concentration of debt maturities in any one period to spread its refinancing risk. The maturity profile of the Group’s principal borrowings at 30 September 2023 shows that the average period to maturity is 3.3 years (2022: 3.9 years). Liquidity risk faced by the Group is mitigated by having diverse sources of finance available to it and by maintaining substantial unutilised committed banking facilities to maintain a level of headroom in line with Board approval. The Group has a £2,000m Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) committed to August 2026. At 30 September 2023, no amounts were drawn under the RCF (2022: £nil). The Group has a $4bn commercial paper programme. Commercial paper is issued to meet short-term liquidity requirements and is supported by the RCF. At 30 September 2023, no commercial paper was outstanding under the programme (2022: £nil).
The Group’s policy is to balance its principal projected cash flows by currency to actual or effective borrowings in the same currency. As currency cash flows are generated, they are used to service and repay debt in the same currency. Where necessary, to implement this policy, forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps are executed which, when applied to the actual currency liabilities, convert these to the required currency. The borrowings in each currency can give rise to foreign exchange differences on translation into sterling. Where the borrowings are less than, or equate to, the net investment in overseas operations, these exchange rate variances may be treated as movements on reserves and recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income rather than in the consolidated income statement. Non-sterling earnings streams are translated at the average rate of exchange for the year. Fluctuations in exchange rates have given and will continue to give rise to translation differences. The Group is only partially protected from the impact of such differences through the matching of cash flows to currency borrowings. The Group has minimal exposure to the foreign currency risk of trade receivables and payables as operations within individual countries have little cross-border activity which might give rise to translation risks on trade-related balances. The main currencies to which the Group’s reported sterling financial position is exposed are the US dollar and Euro. As set out above, the Group seeks to hedge its exposure to currencies by matching debt in currency against the cash flows generated by the Group’s foreign operations in such currencies. The effect on profit for the year (after tax) and total equity of a 10% strengthening of sterling against these currencies on the Group’s financial instruments is shown below. A 10% weakening would result in an equal and opposite impact on the profit or loss and equity of the Group. This table shows the impact on the financial instruments in place at 30 September and has been prepared on the basis that the 10% change in exchange rates occurred on the first day of the financial year and applied consistently throughout the year.
| US dollar £m | Euro £m | US dollar £m | Euro £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ||||
| Increase/(decrease) in profit for the year (after tax) | 14 | (19) | 1 | (26) |
| Increase in total equity | 136 | 95 | 145 | 48 |
| 2022 | ||||
| Increase/(decrease) in profit for the year (after tax) | 14 | (19) | 1 | (26) |
| Increase in total equity | 136 | 95 | 145 | 48 |
As set out above, the Group has effective borrowings in a number of currencies. The Group raises fixed-rate capital market debt and may swap this to floating rate using interest rate swaps on a case-by-case basis. The Group’s policy is to ensure that, in the short term, it is not materially exposed to fluctuations in interest rates in its principal currencies. The Group implements this policy either by borrowing fixed-rate debt or by using interest rate swaps so that the interest rates on at least 80% of the Group’s projected debt are fixed for one year. For the second and third years, interest rates are fixed within ranges of 30%-70% and 0%-40%, respectively. In September 2022, the Group issued fixed-rate sustainable bonds of €500m (£434m) and £250m maturing in 2030 and 2032, respectively. The Group entered into interest rate and cross currency swaps to effectively convert these to sterling, paying a floating interest rate. The bonds and swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges. The proceeds of the bonds have to be allocated to expenditure on Eligible Sustainable Projects in line with the Compass Group Sustainable Financing Framework during the three years before, and two years after, the date of issue.
Consolidated financial statements
178
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
179
20 Financial risk management continued
The sensitivity analysis given below has been determined based on the derivative and non-derivative financial instruments the Group had in place at the year-end date. The effect of a 1% increase in interest rates prevailing at the balance sheet date on the Group’s cash and cash equivalents and debt subject to variable rates of interest at the balance sheet date would be to increase profit for the year (after tax) by £1m (2022: £7m) over the course of a year. A similar 1% decrease in interest rates would result in an equal and opposite effect over the course of a year.
| Sterling £m | US dollar £m | Euro £m | Other £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase in interest rate +1% | |||||
| Floating rate exposure – cash/(debt) | 225 | (170) | (24) | 76 | 107 |
| Increase /(decrease) in profit for the year (after tax) | 2 | (1) | – | – | 1 |
| Sterling £m | US dollar £m | Euro £m | Other £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase in interest rate +1% | |||||
| Floating rate exposure – cash/(debt) | 476 | (36) | 112 | 289 | 841 |
| Increase in profit for the year (after tax) | 4 | – | 1 | 2 | 7 |
These changes are the result of the exposure to interest rates from the Group’s floating-rate cash and cash equivalents and debt. The sensitivity gains and losses given above may vary because cash flows vary throughout the year and interest rate and currency hedging may be implemented after the year-end date in order to comply with the treasury policies outlined above.# Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Group’s policy is to minimise its exposure to credit risk from the failure of any single financial counterparty by spreading its risk across a portfolio of financial counterparties and managing the aggregate exposure to each against certain pre-agreed limits. Exposure to counterparty credit risk arising from deposits and derivatives (including forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps) is concentrated at the Group centre where possible. Financial counterparty limits are derived from the long-term and short-term credit ratings, and the balance sheet strength of the financial counterparty. All financial counterparties are required to have a minimum long-term credit rating from Moody’s of Baa2 and a short-term credit rating from Moody’s of P-2 or equivalent from another recognised agency. To reduce credit exposures, the Group has International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreements with all of its counterparties for financial derivatives, which permit net settlement of assets and liabilities in certain circumstances. The maximum exposure to credit risk resulting from financial activities, without considering netting arrangements, is equal to the carrying value of the Group’s financial assets. At 30 September 2023, 41% of cash and cash equivalents were held with investment-grade bank counterparties, 50% with AAA money market funds and 9% with non-investment-grade bank counterparties. In addition, 100% of derivative instruments were held with investment-grade bank counterparties. Credit sales are only made after credit approval procedures have been completed satisfactorily. The policy for making provisions for bad and doubtful debts varies from country to country as different countries and markets have different payment practices. Various factors are considered, including how overdue the debt is, the type of receivable and its past history, and current market and trading conditions. Full provision is made for debts that are not considered to be recoverable. There is limited concentration of credit risk with respect to trade and other receivables due to the diverse and unrelated nature of the Group’s client and supplier base. Expected credit losses are measured using historical cash collection data grouped according to payment terms. The historical default rates are adjusted where macroeconomic factors are expected to have a significant impact when determining future expected credit loss rates. The expected credit loss provision is calculated using a provision matrix, in which the provision increases as balances age. Trade and other receivables are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery and enforcement activity has ceased. An impairment analysis is performed at each reporting date to measure expected credit losses. Accordingly, the directors believe that there is no further credit provision required in excess of the provision for the impairment of receivables. The book value of trade and other receivables represents the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk. At 30 September 2023, trade receivables of £483m (2022: £516m) were past due but not impaired (see note 16). The Group has made a provision based on a number of factors, including past history of the debtor and expected credit losses, and all amounts not provided for are considered to be recoverable. Management has considered the impact of reasonable changes in the expected credit loss rates used in the estimates made and does not consider that a reasonable change would lead to a material adjustment to the estimate in the next 12 months.
179Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 180 Consolidated financial statements Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023 continued
An analysis of the Group’s derivative financial instruments is shown below:
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current assets £m Non-current assets £m Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | Current assets £m Non-current assets £m Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | |
| Fair value hedges | ||
| Interest rate swaps | – | – |
| Cross currency swaps | – | – |
| Net investment hedges | ||
| Cross currency swaps | – | – |
| Forward currency contracts | 2 | 18 |
| Not in a hedging relationship | ||
| Interest rate swaps | 9 | 5 |
| Forward currency contracts | 7 | 5 |
| Total | 18 | 71 |
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | |
| Fair value hedges | ||
| Interest rate swaps | (26) | (154) |
| Cross currency swaps | (88) | (82) |
| Net investment hedges | ||
| Cross currency swaps | (1) | – |
| Forward currency contracts | – | – |
| Not in a hedging relationship | ||
| Interest rate swaps | (2) | (1) |
| Forward currency contracts | (2) | (3) |
| Total | (207) | (237) |
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current assets £m Non-current assets £m | Current assets £m Non-current assets £m | |
| Net investment hedges | ||
| Cross currency swaps | 43 | – |
| Not in a hedging relationship | ||
| Interest rate swaps | 45 | 76 |
| Forward currency contracts | – | – |
| Total | 45 | 76 |
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | |
| Not in a hedging relationship | ||
| Interest rate swaps | – | (3) |
| Forward currency contracts | – | – |
| Total | – | (3) |
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current assets £m Non-current assets £m Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | Current assets £m Non-current assets £m Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | |
| Fair value hedges | – | – |
| Interest rate swaps | – | – |
| Cross currency swaps | – | – |
| Net investment hedges | ||
| Cross currency swaps | – | – |
| Forward currency contracts | 2 | – |
| Not in a hedging relationship | ||
| Interest rate swaps | 9 | 45 |
| Forward currency contracts | 7 | – |
| Total | 18 | 45 |
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current assets £m Non-current assets £m Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | Current assets £m Non-current assets £m Current liabilities £m Non-current liabilities £m | |
| Fair value hedges | – | – |
| Interest rate swaps | – | – |
| Cross currency swaps | – | – |
| Net investment hedges | ||
| Cross currency swaps | – | – |
| Forward currency contracts | 18 | – |
| Not in a hedging relationship | ||
| Interest rate swaps | 5 | 76 |
| Forward currency contracts | 5 | – |
| Total | 71 | 76 |
On adoption of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, the Group elected to continue to apply the hedge accounting guidance in IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
The Group uses interest rate and cross currency swaps to hedge the fair value of some of its fixed-rate borrowings. These instruments swap the fixed interest payable on the borrowings into floating interest rates and hedge the fair value of the borrowings against changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These swaps all qualify for fair value hedge accounting as defined by IAS 39.
The Group uses foreign currency denominated debt, cross currency swaps and forward currency contracts to partially hedge against the change in the sterling value of its foreign currency denominated net assets due to movements in foreign exchange rates. The carrying value of debt and derivatives in a net investment hedge was £697m (2022: £909m). A foreign exchange gain of £166m (2022: £190m loss) relating to the net investment hedges has been netted off during the year within currency translation differences as presented in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. During the year, cumulative foreign exchange losses on net investment hedges attributable to business disposals of £3m (2022: £nil) were recycled to the consolidated income statement. The balance remaining in the foreign currency translation reserve from net investment hedging relationships for which hedge accounting continues to apply is a loss of £605m (2022: £774m) and for which hedge accounting is no longer applied is £nil (2022: £nil).
The Group has a number of derivative financial instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. These include some interest rate swaps and some forward currency contracts used for interest and cash management.
The impact of the hedged items on the Group’s financial statements is as follows:
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hedged items | Carrying amount of the hedged items £m Accumulated amount of fair value hedge adjustments on the hedged items included in the carrying amount of the hedged items £m Change in fair value of hedged items used to determine hedge effectiveness £m | Carrying amount of the hedged items £m Accumulated amount of fair value hedge adjustments on the hedged items included in the carrying amount of the hedged items £m Change in fair value of hedged items used to determine hedge effectiveness £m |
| Fair value hedges | ||
| Interest rate risk | ||
| Short-term borrowings | (921) | 17 |
| Long-term borrowings | (1,706) | 195 |
| Total | (2,627) | 212 |
Consolidated financial statements180 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 181
The impact of the hedging instruments on the Group’s financial statements is as follows:
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hedging instruments | Nominal amount of the hedging instruments £m Carrying amount of the hedging instruments £m Change in fair value of hedging instruments used to determine hedge effectiveness £m | Nominal amount of the hedging instruments £m Carrying amount of the hedging instruments £m Change in fair value of hedging instruments used to determine hedge effectiveness £m |
| Fair value hedges | ||
| Interest rate risk | ||
| Derivative financial instruments – current assets | – | – |
| Derivative financial instruments – non-current assets | – | – |
| Derivative financial instruments – current liabilities | 939 | (26) |
| Derivative financial instruments – non-current liabilities | 1,914 | (204) |
| Total | 2,853 | (230) |
| Net investment hedges | ||
| Foreign currency risk | ||
| Derivative financial instruments – current assets | (874) | 2 |
| Derivative financial instruments – non-current assets | (252) | – |
| Derivative financial instruments – current liabilities | (383) | (9) |
| Derivative financial instruments – non-current liabilities | (176) | (1) |
| Short-term borrowings | (288) | (288) |
| Long-term borrowings | (404) | (401) |
| Total | (2,377) | (697) |
The notional amount of interest rate and cross currency swaps by currency is as follows:
Notional amount of interest rate and cross currency swaps by currency
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Fair value hedges £m Net investment hedges £m Not in a hedging relationship £m | Fair value hedges £m Net investment hedges £m Not in a hedging relationship £m | |
| Sterling | 800 | – |
| US dollar | 534 | – |
| Euro | 1,519 | 428 |
| Japanese yen | – | – |
| Other | – | – |
| Total | 2,853 | 428 |
The effective currency denomination of borrowings and leases after the effect of derivatives is as follows:
Effective currency denomination of borrowings and leases after the effect of derivatives
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Gross borrowings £m Lease liabilities £m Forward currency contracts 1 £m Effective currency of borrowings £m | Gross borrowings £m Lease liabilities £m Forward currency contracts 1 £m Effective currency of borrowings £m | |
| Sterling | 948 | 214 |
| US dollar | 1,008 | 451 |
| Euro | 1,406 | 151 |
| Japanese yen | – | – |
| Other | 8 | 129 |
| Total | 3,370 | 945 |
The Group and all its derivative counterparties are party to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) fallback protocols which automatically convert derivatives from IBOR to the relevant alternative reference rate when an IBOR rate ceases. As USD LIBOR ceased on 30 June 2023, there is no longer any uncertainty around derivatives which reference USD LIBOR and, therefore, the Group has adopted the IBOR Reform Phase 2 amendments in respect of these derivatives and redocumented its hedges to incorporate the change from USD LIBOR to USD SOFR. The Group’s interest rate benchmark reform process is now complete.
The following table provides an analysis of the expected contractual cash flows, including interest payable, of certain financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments on an undiscounted basis. Where interest payments are calculated at a floating rate, rates of each cash flow until maturity of the instruments are calculated based on the forward yield curve prevailing at the respective year-ends. The gross cash flows of derivatives are presented net for the purposes of this table.
2023
| Maturity analysis of the contractual cash flows of financial liabilities | Less than 1 year £m | Between 1 and 2 years £m | Between 2 and 3 years £m | Between 3 and 4 years £m | Between 4 and 5 years £m | Over 5 years £m | Total £m | Carrying amount £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | 1,105 | 578 | 250 | 246 | 434 | 984 | 3,597 | 3,370 |
| Interest on borrowings | 83 | 72 | 56 | 44 | 37 | 87 | 379 | 379 |
| Lease liabilities | 200 | 175 | 155 | 127 | 102 | 424 | 1,183 | 945 |
| Interest rate swaps | 18 | 24 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 19 | 101 | 90 |
| Cross currency swaps | 25 | 29 | 25 | 27 | 45 | 2 | 153 | 89 |
| Forward currency contracts | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 |
2022
| Maturity analysis of the contractual cash flows of financial liabilities | Less than 1 year £m | Between 1 and 2 years £m | Between 2 and 3 years £m | Between 3 and 4 years £m | Between 4 and 5 years £m | Over 5 years £m | Total £m | Carrying amount £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | 693 | 973 | 608 | 250 | 269 | 1,428 | 4,221 | 3,964 |
| Interest on borrowings | 100 | 85 | 73 | 56 | 46 | 113 | 473 | 30 |
| Lease liabilities | 198 | 162 | 137 | 121 | 97 | 404 | 1,119 | 913 |
| Interest rate swaps | 2 | 26 | 8 | 16 | 14 | 26 | 92 | 77 |
| Cross currency swaps | 4 | 35 | 36 | 32 | 29 | 34 | 170 | 39 |
| Forward currency contracts | (20) | – | – | – | – | – | (20) | (20) |
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised on the Group’s balance sheet when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument and derecognised when it ceases to be a party to such provisions. Financial assets are classified as current if they are expected to be received within 12 months of the balance sheet date. Financial liabilities are classified as current if they are legally due to be paid within 12 months of the balance sheet date. Financial assets and liabilities, including derivative financial instruments, denominated in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at period-end exchange rates. Financial assets are classified as either fair value through profit and loss, fair value through other comprehensive income or amortised cost. Classification and subsequent remeasurement depends on the Group’s business model for managing the financial asset and its cash flow characteristics. Assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows, where those cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest, are measured at amortised cost.
The carrying amounts of the following financial instruments measured at amortised cost approximate to their fair values: trade and other receivables; cash and cash equivalents (excluding money market funds); lease liabilities; provisions; and trade and other payables. Borrowings are measured at amortised cost unless they are part of a fair value hedge, in which case amortised cost is adjusted for the fair value attributable to the risk being hedged. The carrying amount of borrowings at 30 September 2023 is £3,370m (2022: £3,964m). The fair value of borrowings at 30 September 2023, calculated by discounting future cash flows to net present values at current market rates for similar financial instruments (Level 2 inputs), is £3,384m (2022: £3,920m).
The fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the balance sheet date. The fair value measurement hierarchy is as follows:
There were no transfers of financial instruments between levels of the fair value hierarchy in either the year ended 30 September 2023 or 2022. The carrying amounts of financial instruments measured at fair value are shown in the table below:
| Financial instruments measured at fair value | Notes | Level | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current | ||||
| Rabbi Trust investments | 1 | 15 | 623 | 566 |
| Mutual fund investments | 1 | 15 | 48 | 52 |
| Other investments | 1 | 15 | 12 | 12 |
| Life insurance policies | 1 | 15 | 29 | 33 |
| Derivative financial instruments – assets | 20 | 2 | 45 | 76 |
| Derivative financial instruments – liabilities | 20 | 2 | (207) | (237) |
| Trade investments | 1 | 15 | 148 | 127 |
| Contingent consideration payable on business acquisitions | 2 | 22 | (80) | (39) |
| Non-controlling interest put options | 2 | 22 | (18) | (45) |
| Current | ||||
| Money market funds | 3 | 18 | 418 | 474 |
| Derivative financial instruments – assets | 20 | 2 | 18 | 71 |
| Derivative financial instruments – liabilities | 20 | 2 | (37) | (6) |
| Contingent consideration payable on business acquisitions | 2 | 22 | (50) | (30) |
The fair values of financial instruments at levels 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy have been determined based on the valuation methodologies listed below:
A reconciliation from opening to closing balances for Level 3 financial instruments is as follows:
| Level 3 financial instruments | Trade investments £m | Contingent consideration payable on business acquisitions £m | Non-controlling interest put options £m | Trade investments £m | Contingent consideration payable on business acquisitions £m | Non-controlling interest put options £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ||||||
| At 1 October | 127 | (69) | (45) | 76 | (70) | (38) |
| Change in fair value recognised in the income statement | – | (3) | – | – | 9 | – |
| Change in fair value recognised in the statement of comprehensive income | 32 | – | – | 4 | – | – |
| Change in fair value recognised in the statement of changes in equity | – | 13 | – | – | – | (9) |
| Additions | – | (100) | (2) | 27 | (66) | – |
| Purchase of non-controlling interests | – | – | 8 | – | – | – |
| Payments relating to businesses acquired in previous years | – | 38 | 3 | – | 60 | 10 |
| Net present value adjustments | – | (5) | – | – | – | – |
| Currency translation | (11) | 9 | 5 | 20 | (2) | (8) |
| At 30 September | 148 | (130) | (18) | 127 | (69) | (45) |
| 2022 |
The directors do not consider that any reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions would cause the fair value of the Level 3 financial instruments to be significantly higher or lower.
Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value, including transaction costs, and subsequently carried at amortised cost. Trade payables are not interest-bearing and are stated at their nominal value. The Group evaluates supplier arrangements against a number of indicators to assess if the liability has the characteristics of a trade payable or should be classified as borrowings. This assessment considers the commercial purpose of the arrangement, whether the payment terms are similar to customary payment terms, whether the Group is legally discharged from its obligation towards the supplier before the end of the original payment term and the Group’s involvement in agreeing terms between the bank and the supplier.Contingent consideration recognised in a business combination is subsequently measured at fair value through the income statement.
| Trade and other payables | Current £m | Non-current £m | Total £m | Current £m | Non-current £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 2,409 | – | 2,409 | 2,292 | – | 2,292 |
| Accruals | 2,019 | 23 | 2,042 | 1,999 | 28 | 2,027 |
| Deferred income | 284 | 168 | 452 | 305 | 170 | 475 |
| Social security and other taxes | 507 | 28 | 535 | 472 | 23 | 495 |
| Contingent consideration payable on business acquisitions | 50 | 80 | 130 | 30 | 39 | 69 |
| Non-controlling interest put options | – | 18 | 18 | – | 45 | 45 |
| Other payables | 601 | 46 | 647 | 528 | 49 | 577 |
| Total | 5,870 | 363 | 6,233 | 5,626 | 354 | 5,980 |
The current trade and other payables are payable on demand. Trade payable days at 30 September 2023 were 64 days (2022: 64 days on a constant-currency basis).
The ageing of non-current financial liabilities in trade and other payables is as follows:
| Trade and other payables | Between 1 and 2 years £m | Between 2 and 3 years £m | Between 3 and 4 years £m | Between 4 and 5 years £m | Over 5 years £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ||||||
| Financial liabilities | 132 | 25 | 4 | – | 13 | 174 |
| 2022 | ||||||
| Financial liabilities | 59 | 60 | 19 | – | 24 | 162 |
The Group has Supply Chain Financing (SCF) arrangements in place. The principal purpose of these arrangements is to enable the supplier, if it so wishes, to sell its receivables due from the Group to a third-party bank prior to their due date, thus providing earlier access to liquidity. From the Group’s perspective, the invoice payment due date remains unaltered and the payment terms of suppliers participating in the SCF programmes are similar to those suppliers that are not participating, and to the wider industry more generally. If a receivable is purchased by a third-party bank, that third-party bank does not benefit from additional security when compared to the security originally enjoyed by the supplier.
At 30 September 2023, the value of invoices sold under the SCF programmes was £789m, with £735m related to the Group’s programme in the US (2022: £772m and £706m, respectively). These amounts are included in trade payables and all cash flows associated with the programmes are included in net cash flow from operating activities as they continue to be part of the normal operating cycle of the Group.
185Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
186 Consolidated financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023 continued
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Group will be required to settle that obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are measured at the directors’ best estimate of the cost of settling these liabilities and are discounted to present value where the effect is material using the discount rate applicable to the liability.
| Provisions | Workers’ compensation and similar obligations £m | Severance £m | Onerous contracts £m | Legal and other claims £m | Provisions in respect of discontinued and disposed businesses £m | Other £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2021 | 324 | 108 | 36 | 49 | 13 | 51 | 581 |
| Charged to income statement | 117 | 7 | 12 | 2 | – | 6 | 144 |
| Credited to income statement | (19) | (6) | (11) | (5) | – | (6) | (47) |
| Expenditure in the year | (79) | (62) | (18) | (10) | (4) | (5) | (178) |
| Business acquisitions | – | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | 2 |
| Net present value adjustments | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | 5 |
| Reclassification | – | (8) | 11 | (13) | 4 | 1 | (5) |
| Currency adjustment | 66 | 5 | 2 | 2 | (1) | 3 | 77 |
| At 30 September 2022 | 414 | 44 | 33 | 26 | 12 | 50 | 579 |
| Charged to income statement – strategic portfolio review | – | 2 | 15 | – | – | 3 | 20 |
| Charged to income statement – other | 137 | – | 13 | 6 | – | 7 | 163 |
| Credited to income statement | (33) | (1) | (11) | (4) | – | (3) | (52) |
| Expenditure in the year | (99) | (29) | (16) | (3) | – | (5) | (152) |
| Sale and closure of businesses | – | – | – | – | (1) | (1) | (2) |
| Net present value adjustments | 7 | – | – | – | – | – | 7 |
| Reclassification | – | (11) | 1 | – | – | 4 | (6) |
| Currency adjustment | (33) | – | (2) | (2) | (1) | – | (38) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 393 | 5 | 33 | 23 | 10 | 55 | 519 |
Comprised of:
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Current | 233 | 269 |
| Non-current | 286 | 310 |
| Total | 519 | 579 |
In estimating the provisions above, management has made estimates and used assumptions in determining the nature, amount and timing of potential outflows. Management does not consider that a reasonable change in key assumptions in any of the provision estimates made at the date of the balance sheet could lead to a material adjustment in the next 12 months to the carrying amount of the liability recorded.
The provision for workers’ compensation and similar obligations relates mainly to the potential settlement of claims by employees in the US for medical benefits and lost wages associated with injuries incurred in the course of their employment, and is essentially long term in nature.
Provisions for severance primarily represent redundancy costs. The Group expects these provisions to be substantially utilised within the next year.
A provision for onerous contracts is recognised when the expected benefits to be derived by the Group from a contract are lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations under the contract. Provisions for onerous contracts represent the liabilities in respect of unavoidable contract losses which will be utilised over the remaining life of each individual contract. The typical length of a client contract is three to five years. A full analysis is performed at least annually of the future profitability of all loss-making contracts and contracts with low profitability, and of the balance sheet items directly linked to these contracts.
Provisions for legal and other claims relate principally to provisions for the estimated cost of litigation and other sundry claims. The timing of the settlement of these claims is uncertain.
Provisions in respect of discontinued and disposed businesses relate to estimated amounts payable in connection with onerous contracts and claims arising from disposals. The final amount payable remains uncertain as, at the date of approval of these financial statements, negotiations in relation to potential claims are ongoing and there remains a further period during which claims may be received. The timing of any settlement will depend upon the nature and extent of claims received.
Other provisions include environmental provisions in respect of potential liabilities relating to the Group’s responsibility for maintaining its operating sites in accordance with statutory requirements. The Group’s aim is to have a low impact on the environment. These provisions are expected to be utilised as operating sites are closed or as environmental matters are resolved.
Consolidated financial statements186 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
187
The Group operates two types of pension plans:
For defined contribution plans, the Group pays contributions to separately administered pension plans. The contributions payable by the Group are charged to the consolidated income statement when they are due. Payments made to state-managed schemes are treated as payments to defined contribution plans where the Group’s obligations under the plans are equivalent to those arising in a defined contribution pension plan.
For defined benefit plans, the calculation of the defined benefit obligation is performed half-yearly by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit method. A current service cost is recognised which represents the expected present value of the defined benefit pension entitlement earned by members in the period. The consolidated balance sheet reflects a net asset or net liability for each defined benefit pension plan. The net asset or liability recognised is the present value of the defined benefit obligation discounted using the yields on high-quality corporate bonds, less the fair value of plan assets (at bid price), if any. If the fair value of the plan assets exceeds the defined benefit obligation, a pension surplus is only recognised if the Group considers that it has an unconditional right to a refund. For the UK defined benefit plan, the Group considers that it has an unconditional right to a refund of a surplus, assuming the gradual settlement of the plan liabilities over time until all members have left the plan. The trustees cannot unconditionally wind up the plan or use the surplus to enhance member benefits without employer consent. The Group’s judgement is that these trustee rights do not prevent the Group from recognising an unconditional right to a refund and therefore a surplus.
Net interest income (if a plan is in surplus) or net interest expense (if a plan is in deficit) is calculated using yields on high-quality corporate bonds and recognised in the consolidated income statement. Remeasurements, which include gains and losses as a result of changes in actuarial assumptions, the effect of the limit on the plan surplus (if any) and returns on plan assets (other than amounts included in net interest) are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in the period in which they occur.# Consolidated financial statements
Remeasurements are not reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods.
Other post -employment obligations
Some Group companies provide other post -employment benefits. The expected costs of these benefits are accrued over the period of employment using a similar basis to that used for defined benefit pension schemes. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised immediately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The non -qualified deferred compensation plan in the US (Rabbi Trust) does not meet the definition of a defined contribution plan under IAS 19 and is, therefore, accounted for as a defined benefit plan.
Major source of estimation uncertainty
The present value of defined benefit liabilities is estimated based on actuarial assumptions determined with independent actuarial advice, including discount rates, inflation, pension and salary increases, and mortality and other demographic assumptions. A reasonably possible change in the assumptions used to derive these estimates could have a material effect on the present value of defined benefit liabilities in the next 12 months. The key assumptions used to value the liabilities, together with sensitivi ty analysis, are set out below.
Climate change
Plan assets
The trustees of the Compass Group Pension Plan (UK Plan), the Group’s largest defined benefit plan, have integrated climate change considerations into their long -term decision-making and reporting processes across all classes of assets, actively engaging with all fund and portfolio managers.
Defined benefit obligations
The actuarial assumptions used to calculate the present value of defined benefit obligations comprise financial and demograph ic assumptions. The key financial assumptions are discount rates and inflation and, as these reflect long -term market expectations, they implicitly reflect the market’s expectations of the potential impact of climate change. The directors have considered the pot ential impact of climate change on demographic assumption s, in particular on the long-term mortality assumptions and, at the present time, do not believe that there is sufficient evidence to require a change in the assumptions used in the calculation of the defined benefit liabi lities. The directors will continue to monitor any potential future impact on the assumptions used.
187Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
188 Consolidated financial statements
Pension schemes
The Group operates a number of pension arrangements throughout the world which have been developed in accordance with statutory requirements and local customs and practices. The majority of schemes are self-administered and the schemes’ assets are held independently of the Group’s assets. Pension costs are assessed in accordance with the advice of independent, professionally qualified actuaries.
UK schemes
Current UK employees in a pension arrangement are in the Compass Retirement Income Savings Plan (CRISP), a GAD section of the UK Plan or the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST). CRISP was launched on 1 February 2003 and has been the main vehicle for pension provision for eligible new joiners in the UK since that date. CRISP is a defined contribution (money purchase) arrangement whereby the Group will match employee contributions up to 6% of pay (minimum 5%). Within CRISP, a new defined contribution section was established from April 2006 known as the Compass Higher Income Plan (CHIP). Senior employees who contribute to CRISP are offered an additional employer-only contribution into CHIP. The amount of contribution and eligibility for CHIP are decided annually at the Group’s discretion. A CHIP payment may be taken in part, or in whole, as a cash allowance instead of a pension contribution. CRISP has a corporate trustee, CRISP Trustees Limited. The Chairman is a former employee of the Group and the other six trustee directors are UK-based employees of the Group, three of whom are nominated by CRISP members.
The UK Plan is a defined benefit arrangement, which provides predominantly final salary benefits. Those UK employees who transferred from the public sector under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, typically up until 31 March 2015, have been eligible to join the UK Plan, which has otherwise been closed to new entrants since 2003. Such transferees entered into the GAD sections of the UK Plan and are known as ‘GAD members’. However, under the UK government’s revised guidance for ‘Fair Deal for staff pensions’, the expectation is, and the approach has been, that the Group participates in the relevant public sector pension scheme and closes the UK Plan to future entrants. The UK Plan closed to future accrual for all existing members, other than GAD members, on 5 April 2010. The affected members were offered membership of CRISP from 6 April 2010.
The UK Plan operates on a funded basis. The funding policy is to contribute such variable amounts, on the advice of the actuary, as achieves a 100% funding level on a projected salary basis. The actuarial assessments covering expense and contributions are carried out by independent qualified actuaries. A formal actuarial valuation of the UK Plan is carried out every three years. The most recent valuation of the UK Plan took place as at 5 April 2022. At the valuation date, the total market value of the assets of the UK Plan was £2,617m which represented 113% of the benefits that had accrued to members after allowing for expected future increases in earnings. A revised schedule of contributions was agreed by the UK Plan’s trustee and the Company and, with effect from 1 October 2022, the Company pays contributions to the UK Plan at a rate of 47.1% of pensionable pay (previously 57.2%). The UK Plan is reappraised half-yearly for accounting purposes by independent actuaries in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits requirements. The UK Plan has a corporate trustee. There is an independent chairman and one other independent trustee director. There are a further five trustee directors who are either UK-based employees or former employees of the Group (three of whom have been nominated by UK Plan members). The UK Plan operates under the Fifth Definitive Trust Deed dated 25 March 2013 and subsequent amendments and relevant legislation (principally the Pensions Acts 1993, 1995, 2004 and 2021), with regulatory oversight from the Pensions Regulator.
The Group has proposed a bulk transfer of CRISP into the UK Plan and for CRISP to operate as a separate defined contribution section of the UK Plan from 1 January 2024. Following the transfer, the combined board of the UK Plan will include trustee directors from both arrangements. Agreement with the trustees is expected before the end of the calendar year following a period of consultation with CRISP members and potential CRISP members which ended on 8 November 2023.
The Group is subject to the Pension Automatic Enrolment Regulations for its workforce in the UK. All new UK employees who meet the statutory eligibility criteria, and who do not join CRISP or the UK Plan, are automatically enrolled into the NEST. Responsibility for the Group’s ongoing compliance with the Pension Automatic Enrolment Regulations and for ensuring that the administration and investment of funds relating to automatic enrolment remain appropriate lies with the Group’s Pension Automatic Enrolment Governance Committee.
US schemes
In the US, the main vehicles for retirement provision are defined contribution plans. The defined benefit plans are closed to new participants. Compass USA has taken out life insurance policies and invested in mutual funds to meet these unfunded defined benefit pension obligations, working towards a 100% funding level on a projected salary basis. The Group also has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (Rabbi Trust), which is a salary sacrifice scheme providing a tax-efficient savings plan for senior management. Employee and employer contributions to the plan are invested on behalf of the employees in investment funds and they are entitled to the assets and their returns on or after leaving the Group. Plan benefits are paid in cash. Participants can elect to receive payment either as a lump sum or in annual instalments over 5 to 15 years.
Compass USA engages with a number of unions and is required to abide by the individual collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) negotiated with each union. Under the terms of these CBAs, Compass USA is required to pay the union members’ salary and contribute to various multi- employer benefit plans which include: post-employment benefits, including pensions and post-employment healthcare; defined contribution plans, such as 401(k) and annuity and savings plans; and other plans which include legal funds, training funds and education funds.
Consolidated financial statements188
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
189
Participation in multi-employer pension plans bears risks that differ from single-employer plans. These risks include:
Compass USA is involved with 38 multi-employer benefit plans (2022: 39). The Group is not aware of, and has no reasonable expectation that, any plan in which it currently participates is in imminent danger of becoming insolvent or is likely to experience a mass withdrawal.# Post-employment benefits
These plans are accounted for as defined contribution plans as the information provided by the plan administrators is insufficient for them to be accounted for as defined benefit plans. The Group made total contributions of £44m in the year (2022: £30m) to these arrangements.
In Canada, Germany, Norway, Spain and Switzerland, the Group also participates in funded defined benefit arrangements. In other countries, Group employees participate primarily in state arrangements to which the Group makes the appropriate contributions. Other than where required by local regulation or statute, the defined benefit schemes are closed to new entrants. For these schemes, the current service cost will increase under the projected unit credit method as the members of the schemes approach retirement.
The Group’s obligations in respect of defined benefit pension schemes are calculated separately for each scheme by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior years. That benefit is discounted to determine its present value and the fair value of scheme assets is then deducted. The discount rate used is the yield at the valuation date on high-quality corporate bonds, with terms consistent with the timing of the expected benefit payments over future years. The Group takes advice from independent actuaries relating to the appropriateness of the assumptions which include inflation, expected salary and pension increases, and life expectancy of members. It is important to note that comparatively small changes in the assumptions used may have a significant effect on the consolidated income statement and balance sheet.
The split of defined benefit liabilities on an IAS 19 basis between active, deferred and pensioner members is shown below:
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active | Deferred | Pensioner | Active | Deferred | Pensioner | |
| UK Plan | 1% | 43% | 56% | 1% | 46% | 53% |
| UK unfunded arrangements | – | 4% | 96% | – | 4% | 96% |
| US¹ | 40% | 1% | 59% | 41% | 2% | 57% |
| Other | 65% | 3% | 32% | 68% | 3% | 29% |
¹ Excluding the Rabbi Trust.
Disclosures showing the assets and liabilities of the schemes are set out below. The liabilities have been calculated using the following assumptions, which are presented as weighted averages where appropriate:
| Assumptions | UK schemes | US schemes ¹ | Other schemes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | |
| Discount rate | 5.7% | 5.4% | 5.6% | 5.1% | 6.1% | 4.3% |
| Inflation | 3.6% | 3.9% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| CPI inflation | 3.2% | 3.4% | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Rate of increase in salaries | 3.6% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | 4.7% | 2.6% |
| Rate of increase for pensions in payment | 3.3% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Rate of increase for deferred pensions | 3.3% | 3.6% | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
¹ Excluding the Rabbi Trust.
The mortality assumptions used to value the UK pension schemes are derived from the S3PA generational mortality tables (2022: S3PA generational mortality tables) with improvements in line with the projection model prepared by the 2022 Continuous Mortality Investigation of the UK actuarial profession (2022: 2021 model), with an S-kappa of 7.0 (2022: 7.5), with 115% (2022: 119%) weighting for male non-pensioners and 109% (2022: 113%) for male pensioners and 103% (2022: 106%) weighting for female non-pensioners and 99% (2022: 102%) weighting for female pensioners, with a long-term underpin of 1.5% per annum (2022: 1.5% per annum). These mortality assumptions take account of experience to date and assumptions for further improvements in the life expectancy of scheme members. The Group estimates the average duration of the liabilities of the UK and US plans to be 12 years (2022: 13 years) and 8 years (2022: 7 years), respectively.
Examples of the resulting life expectancies for the UK Plan are as follows:
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |
| Member aged 65 in 2023 (2022) | 20.9 | 23.6 |
| Member aged 65 in 2048 (2047) | 22.6 | 25.5 |
The other demographic assumptions have been set having regard to the latest trends in scheme experience and other relevant data. The assumptions are reviewed and updated as necessary as part of the periodic actuarial valuation of pension schemes. For the overseas schemes, regionally appropriate assumptions have been used where recommended by local actuaries. The mortality assumptions used to value the US schemes are derived from the mortality table Pri-2012 (2022: Pri-2012) and MP2021 generational scale (2022: MP2021).
Examples of the resulting life expectancies for the US schemes are as follows:
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |
| Member aged 65 in 2023 (2022) | 22.0 | 23.4 |
| Member aged 65 in 2048 (2047) | 23.7 | 25.1 |
The Group bears a number of risks in relation to its defined benefit pension schemes. These risks and how they are mitigated for the Group’s largest defined benefit plan are described below:
| Risk | Description of risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Interest rate | A decrease in corporate bond yields will increase the schemes’ benefit obligations under IAS 19. The schemes are therefore exposed to the risk that falls in interest rates will decrease the schemes’ surplus. | As part of the investment strategy, the UK Plan aims to mitigate this risk through investment in a liability -driven investment (LDI) portfolio. LDI is a form of investing designed to match to a large extent the movement i n pension plan assets with the movement in projecte d benefit obligations over time. |
| Inflation | The schemes’ benefit obligations are linked to inflation. A higher rate of expected long-term inflation will therefore lead to higher liabilities, both for the IAS 19 and funding liability. | The UK Plan contains caps on increases in scheme benefits to mitigate the risk of increase s in inflation. Additionally, the UK Plan invests in LDI products which increase (decrease) in value when expectations of future inflation rates increase (fall), thus providing protection against inflation risk. |
| Investment | Asset returns can be volatile and there is a risk that the value of pension schemes’ assets may not move in line with changes in pension schem e liabilities. | To mitigate against investment risk, the UK Plan invests in a way which aims to hedge a large proportion of th e movements in the corresponding liabilities and investments are diversified across and within asset classes to avoid overexposure to any one asset class or market. The trustees and the Group regularly monitor th e funding position and operate a diversified investmen t strategy. |
| Life expectancy | The schemes’ obligations are to provide benefits for the life of the member and therefore increases in life expectancy will lead to higher liabilities. | The UK Plan’s trustees and the Group regularly monitor the impact of changes in longevity on scheme obligations. |
Measurement of the Group’s defined benefit obligations is particularly sensitive to changes in key assumptions, including the discount rate, inflation and life expectancy. The sensitivities of the principal assumptions used to measure the defined benefit obligations of the schemes are set out below:
| Financial assumptions | +0.5% £m | -0.5% £m | +0.5% £m | -0.5% £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2023 | 2022 | 2022 | |
| Discount rate | ||||
| UK | -77 | +85 | -90 | +95 |
| US and other | -8 | +9 | -9 | +10 |
| Inflation | ||||
| UK | +42 | -42 | +56 | -54 |
| US and other | +3 | -3 | +3 | -3 |
| CPI inflation | ||||
| UK | +9 | -9 | +12 | -12 |
| +1 year £m | +1 year £m | |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Life expectancy from age 65 | ||
| UK | +50 | +55 |
| US and other | +4 | +4 |
Management has also considered the impact of a 1% change in the discount rate and inflation assumptions used to measure the defined benefit obligations of the UK schemes. A 1% increase or decrease in the discount rate would decrease or increase the liabilities by £148m and £180m, respectively. A 1% increase or decrease in inflation would increase or decrease the liabilities by £85m and £81m, respectively. The sensitivities above consider the impact of the single change shown, with the other assumptions assumed to be unchanged. The sensitivity analyses have been determined based on a method that extrapolates the impact on the defined benefit obligations as a result of reasonable changes in key assumptions occurring at the end of the reporting period. In practice, changes in one assumption may be accompanied by offsetting changes in another assumption (although this is not always the case). The impact of a change in the UK inflation rate shown above includes the impact of a change in both the RPI and CPI inflation rates.
The Group’s net pension surplus or deficit is the difference between the schemes’ assets and liabilities. Changes in the assumptions may occur at the same time as changes in the market value of scheme assets. These may or may not offset the changes in assumptions. For example, a fall in interest rates will increase the schemes’ liabilities, but may also trigger an offsetting increase in the market value of certain assets so there may be little effect on the Group’s net asset or liability.
At 30 September 2023, the assets of the various schemes were invested in a diversified portfolio that consisted primarily of debt securities and property funds. The UK Plan’s corporate bonds are held in a unit-linked insurance policy managed by M&G. The UK Plan’s unquoted property fund assets comprise a UK property fund of £155m (2022: £187m) and a global property fund of £131m (2022: £154m). The UK property fund’s value is based on the net asset value at 30 September 2023.The global property fund’s value is based on a US dollar net asset value at 30 June 2023 converted at the exchange rate at 30 September 2023. There has been no material change in the fair value of the global property fund between 30 June and 30 September 2023. The majority of the remainder of the UK Plan’s assets are held in a bespoke liability-driven investment portfolio in a unit-linked insurance policy managed by Legal & General. The fair value of the Group’s plan assets is shown by major category below:
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK Plan £m | Other £m | Total £m | UK Plan £m | Other £m | Total £m | |
| Equities | ||||||
| Quoted global equities | – | 30 | 30 | 87 | 28 | 115 |
| Government bonds | ||||||
| Quoted UK fixed interest | 520 | – | 520 | 504 | – | 504 |
| Quoted UK index linked | 642 | – | 642 | 816 | – | 816 |
| Corporate bonds | ||||||
| Quoted corporate bonds | 257 | 19 | 276 | 250 | 21 | 271 |
| Quoted diversified securities | – | 14 | 14 | – | 16 | 16 |
| Other | ||||||
| Quoted property funds | – | 20 | 20 | – | 21 | 21 |
| Unquoted property funds | 286 | – | 286 | 341 | – | 341 |
| Unquoted insurance policies | – | 5 | 5 | – | 6 | 6 |
| Derivatives | (14) | – | (14) | – | – | – |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 81 | 2 | 83 | 21 | 3 | 24 |
| Other | 1 | 13 | 14 | – | 13 | 13 |
| At 30 September | 1,773 | 103 | 1,876 | 2,019 | 108 | 2,127 |
The UK Plan holds corporate bonds and other fixed-interest securities. The risk of default on these is assessed by various rating agencies. Some of these bond investments are issued by the UK government. The risk of default on these is lower compared to the risk on corporate bond investments, although some risk may remain. The expected yield on bond investments with fixed interest rates can be derived exactly from their market value.
| Post-employment benefit assets/(obligations) recognised in the balance sheet | Fair value of plan assets £m | Present value of defined benefit obligations £m | Effect of asset ceiling £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK Plan | 1,773 | (1,343) | – | 430 |
| Post-employment benefit assets | 1,773 | (1,343) | – | 430 |
| UK unfunded arrangements | – | (28) | – | (28) |
| US | – | (705) | – | (705) |
| Other | 103 | (176) | – | (73) |
| Post-employment benefit obligations | 103 | (909) | – | (806) |
| Net post-employment benefit obligations | 1,876 | (2,252) | – | (376) |
| Post-employment benefit assets/(obligations) recognised in the balance sheet | Fair value of plan assets £m | Present value of defined benefit obligations £m | Effect of asset ceiling £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK Plan | 2,019 | (1,438) | – | 581 |
| Post-employment benefit assets | 2,019 | (1,438) | – | 581 |
| UK unfunded arrangements | – | (30) | – | (30) |
| US | – | (660) | – | (660) |
| Other | 108 | (172) | (5) | (69) |
| Post-employment benefit obligations | 108 | (862) | (5) | (759) |
| Net post-employment benefit obligations | 2,127 | (2,300) | (5) | (178) |
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value of plan assets £m | Present value of defined benefit obligations £m | Effect of asset ceiling £m | Total £m | Fair value of plan assets £m | Present value of defined benefit obligations £m | Effect of asset ceiling £m | Total £m | |
| At 1 October | 2,127 | (2,300) | (5) | (178) | 3,353 | (3,217) | (7) | 129 |
| Transfer to other investments | – | – | – | – | (546) | – | – | (546) |
| Current service cost | – | (22) | – | (22) | – | (21) | – | (21) |
| Past service (cost) /credit | 1 | (3) | – | (3) | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Administration expenses | 2 | (5) | – | (5) | 4 | – | – | (4) |
| Interest income/(expense) | 108 | (117) | – | (9) | 54 | (66) | – | (12) |
| Remeasurements – financial assumptions | – | 38 | – | 38 | – | 1,063 | – | 1,063 |
| Remeasurements – demographic assumptions | – | 38 | – | 38 | – | 28 | – | 28 |
| Remeasurements – experience adjustments | – | (49) | – | (49) | – | (53) | – | (53) |
| Return on plan assets, excluding interest income | (271) | – | – | (271) | (668) | – | – | (668) |
| Change in asset ceiling, excluding interest income | – | – | 5 | 5 | – | – | 3 | 3 |
| Employer contributions | 29 | – | – | 29 | 18 | – | – | 18 |
| Employee contributions | 3 | (63) | – | (60) | 2 | (50) | – | (48) |
| Benefits paid | (111) | 155 | – | 44 | (96) | 140 | – | 44 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | 2 |
| Currency adjustment | (4) | 71 | – | 67 | 14 | (127) | (1) | (114) |
| At 30 September | 1,876 | (2,252) | – | (376) | 2,127 | (2,300) | (5) | (178) |
The £38m reduction in the present value of defined benefit obligations due to changes in financial assumptions in 2023 includes the impact on the liabilities of the UK Plan of a 0.6 percentage point increase in the discount rate, net of inflation. The negative return on plan assets of £271m mainly reflects the performance of the UK Plan as gilt yields have increased, reducing the value of government bonds, and property values have decreased.
The present value of defined benefit obligations includes £623m (2022: £566m) in respect of the Rabbi Trust, which is exactly matched by its investments (see note 15). Certain Group companies have taken out life insurance policies and invested in mutual funds to meet unfunded pension obligations. The current value of these policies and other assets of £77m (2022: £85m) may not be offset against post-employment benefit obligations under IAS 19 (see note 15).
Net post-employment benefit assets, including the Rabbi Trust investments, life insurance policies and mutual fund investments, is shown below:
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Net post-employment benefit obligations | (376) | (178) |
| Rabbi Trust investments | 623 | 566 |
| Mutual fund investments | 48 | 52 |
| Life insurance policies | 29 | 33 |
| Net post-employment benefit assets | 324 | 473 |
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK £m | US £m | Other £m | Total £m | UK £m | US £m | Other £m | Total £m | |
| Current service cost | – | 14 | 8 | 22 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 21 |
| Past service cost /(credit) | – | – | 3 | 3 | – | – | (1) | (1) |
| Administration expenses | 5 | – | – | 5 | 4 | – | – | 4 |
| Charged to operating expenses | 5 | 14 | 11 | 30 | 5 | 13 | 6 | 24 |
| Interest on net post-employment benefit assets/obligations | (28) | 34 | 3 | 9 | (6) | 15 | 3 | 12 |
| (Credited)/charged to finance costs | (28) | 34 | 3 | 9 | (6) | 15 | 3 | 12 |
| Total | (23) | 48 | 14 | 39 | (1) | 28 | 9 | 36 |
The Group recognised a charge of £208m (2022: £175m) in respect of contributions to defined contribution schemes during the year.
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of changes in financial assumptions | 38 | 1,063 |
| Effect of changes in demographic assumptions | 38 | 28 |
| Effect of experience adjustments | (49) | (53) |
| Remeasurement of post-employment benefit obligations | 27 | 1,038 |
| Return on plan assets, excluding interest income | (271) | (668) |
| Change in asset ceiling, excluding interest income | 5 | 3 |
| Total | (239) | 373 |
The Group made total contributions to defined benefit schemes of £43m (including the Rabbi Trust) in the year (2022: £31m). Contributions in 2023 include £8m following a change in legislation in Türkiye effective from March 2023. The Group expects to make a similar level of contributions to these schemes in 2024 including the impact of the legislation change in Türkiye.
The UK Plan is the largest scheme in the Group and was in surplus on a funding basis at the date of the most recent actuarial valuation as at 5 April 2022 and no deficit contributions are currently required. The remaining Group-funded schemes do not have significant minimum funding requirements whilst contributions to unfunded pension schemes are quite stable. As a result, we do not expect the required future contributions to change substantially beyond next year.
Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.
The capital structure of the Group consists of net debt (see note 34) and total equity. Our capital allocation framework is clear and unchanged. Our priority is to invest in the business to fund growth opportunities, target a strong investment-grade credit rating with a leverage target of around 1x-1.5x net debt to EBITDA and pay an ordinary dividend, with any surplus capital being returned to shareholders. At 30 September 2023, the ratio of net debt to underlying EBITDA was 1.2x (2022: 1.3x) (see note 34).
| 2023 | 2022 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | £m | Number | £m | |
| Allotted, called up and fully paid | ||||
| Ordinary shares of 11 1⁄20 p each | 1,785,403,977 | 198 | 1,785,403,977 | 198 |
| At 30 September | 1,785,403,977 | 198 | 1,785,403,977 | 198 |
The nominal value of shares in the Company purchased and subsequently cancelled is shown as a reduction in share capital and an equal and opposite transfer to the capital redemption reserve.# Own shares reserve
The own shares reserve represents shares in Compass Group PLC held either in treasury, including transaction costs, or by employee share trusts to satisfy liabilities to employees for long-term incentive plans. Own shares are treated as a deduction to equity until the shares are cancelled, reissued or sold, at which point they are transferred to retained earnings. The own shares reserve comprises £1,501m (2022: £515m) in respect of 70,170,859 (2022: 25,202,499) shares in Compass Group PLC held in treasury and £12m (2022: £4m) in respect of 573,223 (2022: 221,909) shares in Compass Group PLC held by the Compass Group PLC All Share Schemes Trust (ASST).
The share buyback announced in November 2022 was completed in March 2023, with 13,127,521 shares repurchased during the year for a total price, including transaction costs, of £251m. Transaction costs of £1m were incurred in respect of the 3,447,549 shares repurchased during the year in respect of the completion of the share buyback announced in May 2022.
In May 2023, the Company announced that it was commencing a further share buyback to repurchase up to £750m of its own shares. During the year, 29,736,882 shares were repurchased for a total price, including transaction costs, of £621m, of which £600m was paid in cash during the year. The mandate issued to the broker to purchase the shares was irrevocable at 30 September 2023 and, therefore, a creditor of £131m in respect of the value of the shares not yet purchased has been recognised. The share buyback was completed in November and, in total, 36,094,092 shares were repurchased under the programme for a total price, including transaction costs, of £752m.
The ASST is a discretionary trust for the benefit of employees and the shares held are used to satisfy some of the Group’s liabilities to employees for long-term incentive plans. During the year, 800,000 (2022: 317,052) shares in Compass Group PLC were purchased by the ASST and 448,686 (2022: 280,371) shares were released from the ASST to satisfy awards under the Company’s long-term incentive plans. At 30 September 2023, the nominal value of the shares in the ASST was £63,341 (2022: £24,521), with a market value of £11m (2022: £4m). No shares have been released from treasury or by the ASST since the end of the financial year to the date of this Report to satisfy awards under the Company’s long-term incentive plans.
The merger reserve arose in 2000 as a result of the merger between Compass and Granada.
The revaluation reserve arose on the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in GR SA during 2008. The portion of the fair value adjustment pertaining to the Group’s existing 50% shareholding in GR SA was credited to the revaluation reserve in accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations.
The translation reserve comprises all foreign currency differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations.
Where put options are held in respect of a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and the minority shareholders hold present access to the returns of the entity, the Group recognises a non-controlling interest, together with a put option liability measured at fair value and a corresponding non-controlling interest put options reserve. Subsequent remeasurements of put option liabilities under the present access and anticipated acquisition methods are recognised in the non-controlling interest put options reserve.
195
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
196
Consolidated financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023 continued
| Capital redemption reserve £m | Own shares reserve £m | Merger reserve £m | Revaluation reserve £m | Translation reserve 1 £m | Non- controlling interest put options reserve £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2022 | 295 | (519) | 4,170 | 7 | 206 | (91) | 4,068 |
| Other comprehensive income | |||||||
| Currency translation differences | – | – | – | – | (335) | – | (335) |
| Reclassification of cumulative currency translation differences on sale of businesses | – | – | – | – | (1) | – | (1) |
| Tax credit on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income | – | – | – | – | 3 | – | 3 |
| Total other comprehensive loss for the year | – | – | – | – | (333) | – | (333) |
| Change in fair value of non-controlling interest put options | – | – | – | – | – | 13 | 13 |
| Changes to non-controlling interests due to acquisitions and disposals | – | – | – | – | – | (2) | (2) |
| Reclassification of non-controlling interest put options reserve on exercise of put options | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | 6 |
| Cost of shares transferred to employees | – | 26 | – | – | – | – | 26 |
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback 2 | – | (1,004) | – | – | – | – | (1,004) |
| Purchase of own shares – employee share-based payments | – | (16) | – | – | – | – | (16) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 295 | (1,513) | 4,170 | 7 | (127) | (74) | 2,758 |
| Share-based payment reserve £m | Capital redemption reserve £m | Own shares reserve £m | Merger reserve £m | Revaluation reserve £m | Translation reserve 1 £m | Non- controlling interest put options reserve £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2021 | 271 | 295 | (2) | 4,170 | 7 | (392) | (87) | 4,262 |
| Other comprehensive income | ||||||||
| Currency translation differences | – | – | – | – | – | 591 | – | 591 |
| Reclassification of cumulative currency translation differences on sale of businesses | – | – | – | – | – | 7 | – | 7 |
| Total other comprehensive income for the year | – | – | – | – | – | 598 | – | 598 |
| Fair value of share-based payments | 34 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 34 |
| Change in fair value of non-controlling interest put options | – | – | – | – | – | – | (2) | (2) |
| Changes to non-controlling interests due to acquisitions and disposals | – | – | – | – | – | – | (7) | (7) |
| Reclassification of non-controlling interest put options reserve on exercise of put options | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5 | 5 |
| Release of share awards settled in existing shares purchased in the market | (4) | – | – | – | – | – | – | (4) |
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback 2 | – | – | (502) | – | – | – | – | (502) |
| Purchase of own shares – employee share-based payments | – | – | (6) | – | – | – | – | (6) |
| Transfer 3 | (301) | – | (13) | – | – | – | – | (314) |
| Cost of shares transferred to employees | – | – | 4 | – | – | – | – | 4 |
| At 30 September 2022 | – | 295 | (519) | 4,170 | 7 | 206 | (91) | 4,068 |
Consolidated financial statements
196
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
197
The Group issues equity-settled share-based payments to certain employees which are measured at fair value at the date of grant using option pricing models. The fair value is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the Group’s estimate of the number of shares expected to vest.
The Group recognised a charge of £44m (2022: £34m) in respect of share-based payment transactions. All share-based payment plans are equity-settled. The charge is broken down by share-based payment plan as follows:
| Share-based payment charge | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term incentive plans | 38 | 27 |
| Restricted shares | 6 | 7 |
| Total | 44 | 34 |
Full details of The Compass Group PLC Long Term Incentive Plan 2018 (2018 LTIP) can be found in the Directors’ remuneration report on pages 97 to 126. The following table shows the movements in shares during the year:
| Long-term incentive plans | 2023 Number of shares | 2022 Number of shares |
|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at 1 October | 7,547,857 | 6,353,294 |
| Awarded | 3,153,815 | 3,328,253 |
| Notional Dividend Shares awarded 1 | 160,952 | 80,631 |
| Vested | (1,113,799) | (29,082) |
| Lapsed | (870,723) | (2,185,239) |
| Outstanding at 30 September | 8,878,102 | 7,547,857 |
The following Executive Committee and Leadership LTIP awards were made under the terms of the 2018 LTIP during the year:
LTIP awards 2023
| Award date | Fair value |
|---|---|
| Executive Committee | 1 Dec 2022 |
| Leadership | 1 Dec 2022 |
| Leadership | 17 May 2023 |
LTIP awards 2022
| Award date | Fair value |
|---|---|
| Executive Committee | 1 Dec 2021 |
| Executive Committee | 4 Feb 2022 |
| Executive Committee | 8 Feb 2022 |
| Leadership | 1 Dec 2021 |
| Leadership | 15 Dec 2021 |
| Leadership | 18 May 2022 |
The vesting conditions of the LTIP awards are included in the Directors’ remuneration report. The fair value of awards subject to Adjusted Free Cash Flow (AFCF) and Return On Capital Employed (ROCE) performance targets is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The vesting probability of these non-market conditions has been assessed based on a simulation model of the AFCF and ROCE forecasts. The fair value of awards subject to Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance targets is calculated using the Monte Carlo model.# Consolidated financial statements
The following assumptions were used in calculating the fair value of LTIP awards made during the year:
| Weighted average assumptions – long-term incentive plans | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Expected volatility | 39.6% | 39.3% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 3.1% | 1.0% |
| Expected life | 3.0 years | 2.9 years |
| Share price at date of grant | 1,856.77p | 1,534.85p |
197Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 198
Eligible awards granted under the 2018 LTIP accrue dividends in the form of Notional Dividend Shares. Accordingly, the dividend yield in the fair value calculation is nil. The weighted average share price at the date of vesting for the 1,113,799 shares (2022: 29,082) that vested during the year was 1,824.00p (2022: 1,455.00p). The LTIP awards outstanding at the end of the year have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.2 years (2022: 1.4 years).
These are awards to certain employees in order to incentivise the achievement of particular business objectives under specific circumstances or where similar such shares have been forfeited by a new employee on joining the Group. The plan can take different forms such as an award of shares dependent on service or achievement of specific performance conditions other than service. The following table shows the movements in shares during the year:
| Restricted shares | 2023 Number of shares | 2022 Number of shares |
|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at 1 October | 1,083,225 | 939,488 |
| Awarded | 365,818 | 581,246 |
| Notional Dividend Shares awarded | 16,228 | 11,234 |
| Vested | (570,398) | (397,632) |
| Lapsed | (69,593) | (51,111) |
| Outstanding at 30 September | 825,280 | 1,083,225 |
The following assumptions were used in calculating the fair value of restricted share awards made during the year:
| Weighted average assumptions – restricted shares | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Expected volatility | 37.0% | 39.4% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 3.4% | 1.1% |
| Expected life | 2.2 years | 2.1 years |
| Share price at date of grant | 1,920.21p | 1,554.40p |
Eligible awards granted under the Restricted Share Award Plan accrue dividends in the form of Notional Dividend Shares. Accordingly, the dividend yield in the fair value calculation is nil. The weighted average share price at the date of vesting for the 570,398 shares (2022: 397,632) that vested during the year was 1,989.24p (2022: 1,573.85p).
Other share-based payment plans comprise The Compass Group Share Option Plan 2010 (CSOP) and Deferred Annual Bonus Plan (DAB). The last CSOP award was made in November 2013 and will expire in November 2023. The last DAB award was made in November 2018. The following table shows the movements in shares during the year:
| Other share-based payment plans | 2023 Number of shares | 2022 Number of shares |
|---|---|---|
| Outstanding at 1 October | 202,422 | 518,151 |
| Vested and exercised | (108,081) | (174,508) |
| Lapsed (following net settlement) | (84,579) | (104,740) |
| Lapsed | (2,340) | (36,481) |
| Outstanding at 30 September | 7,422 | 202,422 |
The expense relating to these plans is not significant.
199Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 200
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the purchase method. The cost of acquisition is measured at the aggregate of the fair values, at the date of exchange, of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed and equity instruments issued. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed are recognised at the fair values at the acquisition date, except for non-current assets (or disposal groups) that are classified as held for sale which are recognised and measured at fair value less costs to sell. The cost of the acquisition in excess of the Group’s interest in the net fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of the acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised directly in the consolidated income statement. Where not all the equity of a subsidiary is acquired, the non-controlling interest is recognised at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the net assets of the subsidiary. Put options over non-controlling interests are recognised as a financial liability measured at fair value which is re-evaluated at each year-end with a corresponding entry in the non-controlling interest put options reserve.
The Group ceases to consolidate a subsidiary when it has lost control. Upon losing control of a subsidiary, a gain or loss is recognised in the consolidated income statement which includes any cumulative currency translation differences previously recognised in other comprehensive income. Any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair value, with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss.
Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if the carrying amount will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable, management is committed to a sale plan, the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition and the sale is expected to be completed within one year from the date of classification. Assets held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying value and fair value less costs to sell. Goodwill is allocated to the held for sale business on a relative fair value basis where this business forms part of a larger CGU. Investments in joint ventures and associates that have been classified as held for sale are no longer accounted for using the equity method. If the non-current asset or disposal group that ceases to be classified as held for sale is a subsidiary, joint venture or associate, prior year comparatives are restated for the periods since classification as held for sale and accounted for retrospectively.
The total cash spent on the acquisition of subsidiaries during the year, net of cash acquired, was £336m (2022: £273m), including £41m of deferred and contingent consideration and other payments relating to businesses acquired in previous years and £17m of acquisition transaction costs included in net cash flow from operating activities. On 20 March 2023, the Group acquired the trade and assets of Parks Coffee, a provider of workplace refreshments in the US, for an initial consideration of $108m (£90m). Total consideration includes $6m (£5m) payable in 2024 and an estimated $23m (£20m) payable in 2025 contingent on the operation of an earn-out. The goodwill in relation to the assets acquired is £43m. This goodwill represents the premium the Group paid to acquire the business that complements its existing businesses and creates significant opportunities and other synergies.
199Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 200
The following table summarises the recognised amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition of Parks Coffee:
| Book value £m | Fair value £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Net assets acquired | ||
| Other intangible assets | 1 | 64 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 5 | 5 |
| Inventories | 4 | 4 |
| Trade and other payables | (1) | (1) |
| Fair value of net assets acquired | 72 | |
| Goodwill | 43 | |
| Total consideration | 115 | |
| Satisfied by | ||
| Cash consideration paid | 90 | |
| Deferred and contingent consideration payable | 25 | |
| Total consideration | 115 |
In addition to the acquisition set out above, the Group also completed a number of other acquisitions during the year. A summary of all acquisitions completed during the year is presented in aggregate below:
| 2023 Book value £m | 2023 Fair value £m | 2022 Book value £m | 2022 Fair value £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net assets acquired | ||||
| Other intangible assets | 5 | 221 | 17 | 140 |
| Right-of-use assets | – | – | 7 | 7 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 23 | 23 | 7 | 7 |
| Trade and other receivables | 15 | 15 | 36 | 36 |
| Inventories | 11 | 11 | 6 | 6 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 11 | 11 | – | – |
| Lease liabilities | – | – | (7) | (7) |
| Provisions | – | – | (2) | (2) |
| Current tax liabilities | (2) | (2) | – | – |
| Deferred tax liabilities | (1) | (19) | (6) | (6) |
| Trade and other payables | (16) | (16) | (36) | (36) |
| Fair value of net assets acquired | 244 | 145 | ||
| Less: Step acquisitions | (24) | – | ||
| Less: Non-controlling interests | (2) | (8) | ||
| Goodwill | 184 | 122 | ||
| Total consideration | 402 | 259 | ||
| Satisfied by | ||||
| Cash consideration paid | 289 | 193 | ||
| Contingent consideration payable | 100 | 66 | ||
| Deferred consideration payable | 13 | – | ||
| Total consideration | 402 | 259 | ||
| Cash flow | ||||
| Cash consideration paid | 289 | 193 | ||
| Less: Cash and cash equivalents acquired | (11) | – | ||
| Acquisition transaction costs | 1 | 17 | ||
| Net cash outflow arising on acquisition | 295 | 203 | ||
| Deferred and contingent consideration and other payments relating to businesses acquired in previous years | 2 | 41 | ||
| Total cash outflow from purchase of subsidiary companies | 336 | 273 | ||
| Consolidated cash flow statement | ||||
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 17 | 10 | ||
| Net cash flow from investing activities | 319 | 263 | ||
| Total cash outflow from purchase of subsidiary companies | 336 | 273 |
Contingent consideration is an estimate at the date of acquisition of the amount of additional consideration that will be payable in the future. The actual amount paid can vary from the estimate depending on the terms of the transaction and, for example, the actual performance of the acquired business. The fair value adjustments made in respect of acquisitions in the year to 30 September 2023 are provisional and will be finalised within 12 months of the acquisition date, principally in relation to the valuation of contracts acquired. The goodwill arising on the acquisition of the businesses represents the premium the Group has paid to acquire companies which complement its existing businesses and create significant opportunities for cross-selling and other synergies. The goodwill arising is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The acquisitions did not have a material impact on the Group’s revenue or profit for the year.
Sale and closure of businesses
The Group has recognised a net gain of £20m on the sale and closure of businesses (2022: net loss of £7m), including exit costs of £11m (2022: £7m). Activity in the year includes the exit from seven tail countries, together with the sale of businesses in the US and UK, and a further 28% shareholding in Highways Royal Co., Limited (Japanese Highways). A summary of business disposals completed during the year is presented in aggregate below:
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Net assets disposed | ||
| Goodwill | 27 | 5 |
| Other intangible assets | 17 | 1 |
| Right-of-use assets | 8 | – |
| Property, plant and equipment | 18 | 1 |
| Deferred tax assets | 1 | 1 |
| Trade and other receivables | 27 | 2 |
| Inventories | 9 | – |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 29 | 1 |
| Assets held for sale | 26 | 16 |
| Lease liabilities | (9) | (1) |
| Provisions | (2) | (2) |
| Trade and other payables | (41) | (5) |
| Post-employment benefit liabilities | – | (2) |
| Net assets disposed | 110 | 17 |
| Consolidated income statement | ||
| Cash consideration | 83 | 24 |
| Deferred consideration | 1 | 57 |
| Less: Net assets disposed | (110) | (17) |
| Less: Exit costs | (11) | (7) |
| Add/(less): Reclassification of cumulative currency translation differences on sale of businesses | 2 | 1 |
| Net gain/(loss) on sale and closure of businesses | 20 | (7) |
| Consolidated cash flow statement | ||
| Cash consideration | 83 | 24 |
| Exit costs | (7) | (3) |
| Cash and cash equivalents disposed | (29) | (1) |
| Tax receipts in respect of prior year business disposals | – | 15 |
| Net proceeds from sale of subsidiary companies, joint ventures and associates net of exit costs | 47 | 35 |
Assets held for sale
The Group’s balance sheet includes interests in joint ventures and associates held for sale of £4m (2022: £26m) which represent the final 5% shareholding in Japanese Highways which it has agreed to sell. The non-recurring fair value measurement of the business held for sale is categorised as a Level 3 fair value and is based on the agreed sale price.
Reconciliation of operating profit to cash generated from operations
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating profit before joint ventures and associates | 1,835 | 1,455 |
| Adjustments for: | ||
| Acquisition-related charges | 108 | 82 |
| Charges related to the strategic portfolio review | 99 | – |
| COVID-19 resizing credit | – | (4) |
| One-off pension charge | 7 | – |
| Amortisation – other intangible assets | 110 | 100 |
| Amortisation – contract fulfilment assets | 231 | 214 |
| Amortisation – contract prepayments | 54 | 40 |
| Depreciation – right-of-use assets | 163 | 156 |
| Depreciation – property, plant and equipment | 276 | 260 |
| Unwind of costs to obtain contracts | 22 | 18 |
| Impairment losses – non-current assets | 10 | 15 |
| Impairment reversals – non-current assets | (2) | (4) |
| Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets | (3) | – |
| Other non-cash changes | (1) | (4) |
| Decrease in provisions | (41) | (77) |
| Investment in contract prepayments | (72) | (64) |
| Increase in costs to obtain contracts | 4 | (37) |
| Post-employment benefit obligations net of service costs | (18) | (7) |
| Share-based payments – charged to profit | 44 | 34 |
| Operating cash flow before movements in working capital | 2,785 | 2,183 |
| Increase in inventories | (97) | (122) |
| Increase in receivables | (557) | (876) |
| Increase in payables | 556 | 839 |
| Cash generated from operations | 2,687 | 2,024 |
Movements for the year ended 30 September 2023
| 1 October 2022 £m | Cash outflow/ (inflow) £m | Other non-cash movements £m | New lease liabilities and amendments £m | Currency translation gains £m | 30 September 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (excluding bank overdrafts) | (3,713) | 437 | (30) | – | 99 | (3,207) |
| Lease liabilities | (913) | 176 | 9 | (264) | 47 | (945) |
| Derivative financial instruments | (96) | (127) | (8) | – | 50 | (181) |
| Net movement in assets and liabilities arising from financing activities | 486 | |||||
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback | 929 | |||||
| Purchase of own shares – employee share-based payments | 16 | |||||
| Purchase of non-controlling interests | 8 | |||||
| Dividends paid to equity shareholders | 648 | |||||
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | 6 | |||||
| Net cash flow from financing activities | 2,093 |
Movements for the year ended 30 September 2022
| 1 October 2021 £m | Cash outflow/ (inflow) £m | Other non-cash movements £m | New lease liabilities and amendments £m | Currency translation losses £m | 30 September 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings (excluding bank overdrafts) | (3,451) | (380) | 318 | – | (200) | (3,713) |
| Lease liabilities | (845) | 152 | 3 | (139) | (84) | (913) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 102 | 67 | (251) | – | (14) | (96) |
| Net movement in assets and liabilities arising from financing activities | (161) | |||||
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback | 425 | |||||
| Purchase of own shares – employee share-based payments | 6 | |||||
| Purchase of non-controlling interests | 2 | |||||
| Dividends paid to equity shareholders | 418 | |||||
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | 3 | |||||
| Net cash flow from financing activities | 693 |
Other non-cash movements are as follows:
| Other non-cash movements | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Amortisation of fees and discounts on issue of debt | (4) | (3) |
| Fees and discounts accrued on issue of debt | – | 1 |
| Changes in fair value of borrowings in a fair value hedge | (26) | 320 |
| Borrowings | (30) | 318 |
| Lease liabilities acquired through business acquisitions | – | (7) |
| Lease liabilities derecognised on sale and closure of businesses | 9 | 1 |
| COVID-19 rent concessions | – | 2 |
| Reclassification | – | 7 |
| Lease liabilities | 9 | 3 |
| Changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (8) | (251) |
| Total | (29) | 70 |
Significant accounting policy
Provisions for legal and other claims are recognised when the Group has a present obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Group will be required to settle that obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Where it is possible that a settlement will be reached or it is not possible to make a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation, no provision is recognised, but appropriate disclosure as a contingent liability is made.
Performance bonds, guarantees and indemnities
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance bonds, guarantees and indemnities (including those of associated undertakings) | 1 | 410 |
| 1. Excludes post-employment obligations, borrowings and lease liabilities. |
The Company and certain subsidiary undertakings have, in the normal course of business, given guarantees and entered into counter indemnities in respect of such guarantees relating to the Group’s own contracts and/or the Group’s share of certain contractual obligations of joint arrangements and associates. Where the Group enters into such arrangements, it does so in order to provide assurance to the beneficiary, typically the client, that it will fulfil its contractual obligations, rather than to provide an insurance contract to compensate the client in the event that it does not fulfil those contractual obligations. The issue of such guarantees and indemnities does not increase the Group’s overall exposure and the disclosure of such performance bonds, guarantees and indemnities is given for information purposes only.
Litigation and claims
The Group is involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the nature of its business and maintains insurance cover to reduce financial risk associated with claims related to these proceedings.# Consolidated financial statements
Contracted for but not provided for
| | 2023 £m | 2022 £m |
|----------------------|---------|---------|
| Client contract intangibles | 72 | 72 |
| Contract balances | 570 | 539 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 37 | 28 |
| Total | 679 | 639 |
The following transactions were carried out with related parties of Compass Group PLC:
Transactions between the ultimate parent company and its subsidiaries, and between subsidiaries, have been eliminated on consolidation.
There were no significant transactions between joint ventures or joint venture partners and the rest of the Group during the year.
There were no significant transactions with associated undertakings during the year.
The remuneration of directors and key management personnel is set out in note 4. During the year, there were no other material transactions or balances between the Group and its key management personnel or members of their close families.
Details of the Group’s post-employment benefit schemes are set out in note 24.
With effect from 1 October 2023, the reporting currency of the Group was changed from sterling to US dollars.
On 2 October 2023, the Group sold its business in Argentina. The net assets of the business at 30 September 2023 were not material. The disposal will be recognised in 2024 and include a £44m charge in respect of cumulative currency translation differences.
On 2 November 2023, the Group entered into an agreement to acquire Hofmann Menü-Manufaktur GmbH, a German producer of high-quality cook and freeze meals, for €270m (£234m) subject to regulatory approval which we expect to receive during the first half of the 2024 financial year.
In the period from 1 October to 14 November 2023, 6,357,210 shares were repurchased for a total price, including transaction costs, of £131m under the share buyback announced in May 2023.
In November 2023, we announced a further share buyback of up to $500m (£410m), to complete in 2024 subject to M&A activity.
On 20 November 2023, a final dividend in respect of 2023 of 28.1p per share, £482m in aggregate, was proposed.
The Executive Committee manages and assesses the performance of the Group using various underlying and other Alternative Performance Measures (APMs). These measures are not defined by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or other generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and may not be directly comparable with APMs used by other companies.
Underlying measures reflect ongoing trading and, therefore, facilitate meaningful year-on-year comparison. The Group’s APMs, together with the results prepared in accordance with IFRS, provide comprehensive analysis of the Group’s results. Accordingly, the relevant statutory measures are also presented where appropriate.
Certain of the Group’s APMs are financial Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) which measure progress against our strategy. In determining the adjustments to arrive at underlying results, we use a set of established principles relating to the nature and materiality of individual items or groups of items, including, for example, events which:
(i) are outside the normal course of business;
(ii) are incurred in a pattern that is unrelated to the trends in the underlying financial performance of our ongoing business; or
(iii) are related to business acquisitions or disposals as they are not part of the Group’s ongoing trading business and the associated cost impact arises from the transaction rather than from the continuing business.
| Measure | Definition | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||
| Underlying revenue | Revenue plus share of revenue of joint ventures. | Allows management to monitor the sales performance of the Group’s subsidiaries and joint ventures. |
| Underlying operating profit | Operating profit excluding specific adjusting items 2 . | Provides a measure of operating profitability that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying operating margin¹ | Underlying operating profit divided by underlying revenue. | An important measure of the efficiency of our operations in delivering great food and support services to our clients and consumers. |
| Organic revenue¹ | Current year: Underlying revenue excluding businesses acquired, sold and closed in the year. Prior year: Underlying revenue including a proforma 12 months in respect of businesses acquired in the year and excluding businesses sold and closed in the year translated at current year exchange rates. Where applicable, a 53rd week is excluded from the current or prior year. | Embodies our success in growing and retaining our customer base, as well as our ability to drive volumes in our existing business es and maintain appropriate pricing levels in light of input cost inflation. |
| Organic operating profit | Current year: Underlying operating profit excluding businesses acquired, sold and closed in the year. Prior year: Underlying operating profit including a proforma 12 months in respect of businesses acquired in the year and excluding businesses sold and clo sed in the year translated at current year exchange rates. Where applicable, a 53rd week is excluded from the current or prior year. | Provides a measure of operating profitability that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying finance costs | Finance costs excluding specific adjusting items 2 . | Provides a measure of the Group’s cost of financing excluding items outside of the control of management. |
| Underlying profit before tax | Profit before tax excluding specific adjusting items 2 . | Provides a measure of Group profitability that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying income tax expense | Income tax expense excluding tax attributable to specific adjusting items 2 . | Provides a measure of income tax expense that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying effective tax rate | Underlying income tax expense divided by underlying profit before tax. | Provides a measure of the effective tax rate that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying profit for the year | Profit for the year excluding specific adjusting items 2 and tax attributable to those items. | Provides a measure of Group profitability that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying profit attributable to equity shareholders (underlying earnings) | Profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders excluding specific adjusting items 2 and tax attributable to those items. | Provides a measure of Group profitability that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying earnings per share¹ | Earnings per share excluding specific adjusting items 2 and tax attributable to those items. | Measures the performance of the Group in delivering value to shareholders. |
| Measure | Definition | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow | ||
| Capital expenditure | Purchase of intangible assets, purchase of contract fulfilment assets, purchase of property, plant and equipment and investment in contract prepayments, less proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets. | Provides a measure of expenditure on long-term intangible, tangible and contract-related assets, net of the proceeds from disposal of intangible, tangible and contract-related assets. |
| Underlying operating cash flow | Net cash flow from operating activities, including purchase of intangible assets, purchase of contract fulfilment assets, purchase of property, plant and equipment, proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets, repayment of principal under lease liabilities and share of results of joint ventures and associates, and excluding interest and net tax paid, post-employment benefit obligations net of service costs, cash payments related to the cost action programme and COVID-19 resizing costs, strategic portfolio review and one-off pension charge, and acquisition transaction costs. | Provides a measure of the success of the Group in turning profit into cash that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying operating cash flow conversion | Underlying operating cash flow divided by underlying operating profit. | Provides a measure of the success of the Group in turning profit into cash that is comparable over time. |
| Free cash flow | Net cash flow from operating activities, including purchase of intangible assets, purchase of contract fulfilment assets, purchase of property, plant and equipment, proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets, purchase of other investments, proceeds from sale of other investments, dividends received from joint ventures and associates, interest received, repayment of principal under lease liabilities and dividends paid to non-controlling interests. | Provides a measure of the success of the Group in turning profit into cash that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying free cash flow¹ | Free cash flow excluding cash payments related to the cost action programme and COVID-19 resizing costs, strategic portfolio review and one-off pension charge, and acquisition transaction costs. | Provides a measure of the success of the Group in turning profit into cash that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying free cash flow conversion | Underlying free cash flow divided by underlying operating profit. | Provides a measure of the success of the Group in turning profit into cash that is comparable over time. |
| Underlying cash tax rate | Net tax paid included in net cash flow from operating activities divided by underlying profit before tax. | Provides a measure of the cash tax rate that is comparable over time. |
Business growth | |
New business | Current year underlying revenue for the period in which no revenue had been recognised in the prior year. | The measure of incremental revenue in the current year from new business.
Lost business | Prior year underlying revenue for the period in which no revenue has been recognised in the current year. | The measure of lost revenue in the current year from ceased business.
Net new business | New business minus lost business as a percentage of prior year organic revenue. | The measure of net incremental revenue in the current year from business wins and losses.
Retention | 100% minus lost business as a percentage of prior year organic revenue. | The measure of our success in retaining business.
¹ Key Performance Indicator.
| Measure | Notes | 2023 Statutory £m | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2023 Underlying £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 2 | 1,891 | 125 | – | 7 | – | 99 | – | 2,122 |
| Net gain on sale and closure of businesses | 20 | – | – | – | – | – | (20) | – | – |
| Finance costs | 5 | (164) | – | – | – | – | 28 | – | (136) |
| Profit before tax | 1,747 | 125 | – | 7 | – | 79 | 28 | 1,986 | |
| Income tax expense | 6 | (429) | (26) | – | (1) | – | (18) | (7) | (481) |
| Profit for the year | 1,318 | 99 | – | 6 | – | 61 | 21 | 1,505 | |
| Less: Non-controlling interests | (4) | – | – | – | – | – | – | (4) | |
| Profit attributable to equity shareholders | 1,314 | 99 | – | 6 | – | 61 | 21 | 1,501 | |
| Earnings per share (p) | 75.4p | 5.7p | – | 0.3p | – | 3.5p | 1.2p | 86.1p | |
| Effective tax rate (%) | 24.6% | 24.2% |
| Measure | Notes | 2022 Statutory £m | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2022 Underlying £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating profit | 2 | 1,500 | 92 | (4) | – | 2 | – | – | 1,590 |
| Net loss on sale and closure of businesses | (7) | – | – | – | – | 7 | – | – | – |
| Finance costs | 5 | (24) | – | – | – | – | – | (76) | (100) |
| Profit before tax | 1,469 | 92 | (4) | – | 2 | 7 | (76) | 1,490 | |
| Income tax expense | 6 | (352) | (25) | (1) | – | (2) | (3) | 18 | (365) |
| Profit for the year | 1,117 | 67 | (5) | – | – | 4 | (58) | 1,125 | |
| Less: Non-controlling interests | (4) | – | – | – | – | – | – | (4) | |
| Profit attributable to equity shareholders | 1,113 | 67 | (5) | – | – | 4 | (58) | 1,121 | |
| Currency adjustments | 35 | ||||||||
| Profit attributable to equity shareholders – constant currency | 1,156 | ||||||||
| Earnings per share (p) | 62.6p | 3.8p | (0.3)p | – | – | 0.2p | (3.3)p | 63.0p | |
| Earnings per share – constant currency (p) | 65.0p | ||||||||
| Effective tax rate (%) | 24.0% | 24.5% |
Specific adjusting items are as follows:
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Underlying operating profit | 2,122 | 1,590 |
| Deduct : Tax on underlying operating profit at effective tax rate | (513) | (390) |
| Operating profit of non-controlling interests net of tax | (4) | (4) |
| NOPAT | 1,605 | 1,196 |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Underlying operating profit | 2,122 | 1,590 |
| Add back/(deduct): Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets | 439 | 416 |
| Amortisation of other intangible assets, contract fulfilment assets and contract prepayments | 395 | 354 |
| Impairment losses –non-current assets | 10 | 15 |
| Impairment reversals –non-current assets | (2) | (4) |
| Underlying EBITDA | 2,964 | 2,371 |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | (3,370) | (3,964) |
| Lease liabilities | (945) | (913) |
| Derivative financial instruments | (181) | (96) |
| Gross debt | (4,496) | (4,973) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 843 | 1,983 |
| Net debt | (3,653) | (2,990) |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | (1,024) | 29 |
| (Deduct)/add back: Increase in borrowings | (1) | (677) |
| Repayment of borrowings | 438 | 297 |
| Net cash flow from derivative financial instruments | (127) | 67 |
| Repayment of principal under lease liabilities | 176 | 152 |
| Increase in net debt from cash flows | (538) | (132) |
| New lease liabilities and amendments | (264) | (139) |
| Amortisation of fees and discounts on issue of debt | (4) | (3) |
| Fees and discounts accrued on issue of debt | – | 1 |
| Changes in fair value of borrowings in a fair value hedge | (26) | 320 |
| Lease liabilities acquired through business acquisitions | – | (7) |
| Lease liabilities derecognised on sale and closure of businesses | 9 | – |
| COVID-19 rent concessions | – | 2 |
| Reclassification | – | 7 |
| Changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (8) | (251) |
| Currency translation gains/(losses) | 168 | (251) |
| Increase in net debt | (663) | (452) |
| Net debt at 1 October | (2,990) | (2,538) |
| Net debt at 30 September | (3,653) | (2,990) |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Net debt | 3,653 | 2,990 |
| Underlying EBITDA | 2,964 | 2,371 |
| Net debt to EBITDA (times) | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| NOPAT | 1,605 | 1,196 |
| Average capital employed | 8,215 | 7,567 |
| ROCE (%) | 19.5% | 15.8% |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase of intangible assets | 215 | 177 |
| Purchase of contract fulfilment assets | 311 | 218 |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | 365 | 282 |
| Investment in contract prepayments | 72 | 64 |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets | (64) | (37) |
| Capital expenditure | 899 | 704 |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 2,076 | 1,596 |
| Purchase of intangible assets | (215) | (177) |
| Purchase of contract fulfilment assets | (311) | (218) |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (365) | (282) |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets | 64 | 37 |
| Repayment of principal under lease liabilities | (176) | (152) |
| Share of results of joint ventures and associates | 56 | 45 |
| Add back: Interest paid | 170 | 96 |
| Net tax paid | 441 | 332 |
| Post-employment benefit obligations net of service costs | 10 | 7 |
| Cash payments related to the cost action programme and COVID-19 resizing costs | 29 | 57 |
| Cash payments related to the strategic portfolio review | 20 | – |
| Cash payments related to the one-off pension charge | 9 | – |
| Acquisition transaction costs | 17 | 10 |
| Underlying operating cash flow | 1,825 | 1,351 |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Underlying operating cash flow | 1,825 | 1,351 |
| Underlying operating profit | 2,122 | 1,590 |
| Underlying operating cash flow conversion (%) | 86.0% | 85.0% |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Net cash flow from operating activities | 2,076 | 1,596 |
| Purchase of intangible assets | (215) | (177) |
| Purchase of contract fulfilment assets | (311) | (218) |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (365) | (282) |
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets | 64 | 37 |
| Purchase of other investments | (3) | (42) |
| Proceeds from sale of other investments | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends received from joint ventures and associates | 49 | 51 |
| Interest received | 50 | 10 |
| Repayment of principal under lease liabilities | (176) | (152) |
| Dividends paid to non-controlling interests | (6) | (3) |
| Free cash flow | 1,166 | 823 |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Free cash flow | 1,166 | 823 |
| Add back: Cash payments related to the cost action programme and COVID-19 resizing costs | 29 | 57 |
| Cash payments related to the strategic portfolio review | 20 | – |
| Cash payments related to the one-off pension charge | 9 | – |
| Acquisition transaction costs | 17 | 10 |
| Underlying free cash flow | 1,241 | 890 |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Underlying free cash flow | 1,241 | 890 |
| Underlying operating profit | 2,122 | 1,590 |
| Underlying free cash flow conversion (%) | 58.5% | 56.0% |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax received | 25 | 31 |
| Tax paid | (466) | (363) |
| Net tax paid | (441) | (332) |
| Underlying profit before tax | 1,986 | 1,490 |
| Underlying cash tax rate (%) | 22.2% | 22.3% |
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| New business less lost business | 1,205 | 1,398 |
| Prior year organic revenue | 26,087 | 18,617 |
| Net new business (%) | 4.6% | 7.5% |
Average rates are used to translate the income statement and cash flow statement. Closing rates are used to translate the balance sheet. Only the most significant currencies are shown.
| 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Average exchange rate for the year | ||
| Australian dollar | 1.84 | 1.80 |
| Brazilian real | 6.22 | 6.72 |
| Canadian dollar | 1.65 | 1.64 |
| Euro | 1.15 | 1.18 |
| Japanese yen | 171.13 | 158.27 |
| Turkish lira | 26.28 | 18.45 |
| UAE dirham | 4.49 | 4.70 |
| US dollar | 1.22 | 1.28 |
| Closing exchange rate at 30 September | ||
| Australian dollar | 1.89 | 1.74 |
| Brazilian real | 6.11 | 6.04 |
| Canadian dollar | 1.65 | 1.53 |
| Euro | 1.15 | 1.14 |
| Japanese yen | 182.14 | 161.58 |
| Turkish lira | 33.46 | 20.69 |
| UAE dirham | 4.48 | 4.10 |
| US dollar | 1.22 | 1.12 |
| Principal activities | Country of Incorporation |
|---|---|
| Australia | |
| Ground Floor 35 – 51 Mitchell Street, McMahons Point, NSW 2060, Australia | |
| Compass Group (Australia) Pty Limited | Food and support services |
| Belgium | |
| 1831 Diegem, Hermeslaan 1H, Belgium | |
| Compass Group Belgium NV | Food services |
| Brazil | |
| Rua Werner Von Siemens 111, Building 11 (Tower A), Floor 15, Suite 151, Lapa de Baixo, 05.069-900, Brazil | |
| GR Serviços e Alimentação Ltda. | Food and support services |
| Canada | |
| 1 Prologis Boulevard, Suite 400, Mississauga, Ontario L5W 0G2, Canada | |
| Compass Group Canada Ltd. Groupe Compass Canada Ltée (iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(viii) | Food and support services |
| Chile | |
| Av. Las Condes 11.774, 7th floor, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile | |
| Compass Catering Y Servicios Chile Limitada | Food and support services |
| Denmark | |
| Rued Langgards Vej 8, 1. sal, 2300 København S, DK, Denmark | |
| Compass Group Danmark A/S | Food services |
| Finland | |
| P.O. Box 210, FI-00281 Helsinki, Finland | |
| Compass Group Finland Oy | Food services |
| France | |
| 123 Avenue de la République – Hall A, 92320 Châtillon, France | |
| Compass Group France Holdings SAS | Holding company |
| Compass Group France SAS | Food and support services |
| Germany | |
| Helfmann-Park 2, 65760, Eschborn, Germany | |
| Compass Group Deutschland GmbH | Holding company |
| Eurest Deutschland GmbH | Food service to business and industry |
| Eurest Services GmbH | Support services to business and industry |
| Italy | |
| Via Angelo Scarsellini, 14, 20161, Milano, Italy | |
| Compass Group Italia S.p.A. | Food and support services |
| Japan | |
| Hamarikyu Kensetsu Plaza, 5-5-12, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan | |
| Compass Group Japan Inc. | Food and support services |
| Netherlands | |
| Haaksbergweg 70, 1101 DZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands | |
| Compass Group International B.V. | Holding company |
| Compass Group Nederland B.V. | Food and support services |
| Compass Group Nederland Holding B.V. | Holding company |
| Norway | |
| Drengsrudbekken 12, 1383, PO Box 74, NO-1371, Asker, Norway | |
| Compass Holding Norge AS | Holding company |
| Spain | |
| Calle Pinar de San José 98 planta 1ª 28054 Madrid, Spain | |
| Eurest Colectividades S.L.U. |
Country of Incorporation: Sweden
Box 1183, 171 23 Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
Compass Group Sweden AB
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Switzerland
Oberfeldstrasse 14, 8302, Kloten, Switzerland
Compass Group (Schweiz) AG
Holding company
Restorama AG
Food service
Country of Incorporation: Türkiye
Ünalan Mah. Libadiye Cad. Emaar Square Sit. F Blok No:82F/77 Üsküdar Istanbul, Türkiye
Sofra Yemek Űretim Ve Hizmet A.Ş.
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: UK
Parklands Court, 24 Parklands, Birmingham Great Park, Rubery, Birmingham, B45 9PZ, UK
Compass Contract Services (U.K.) Limited
Food and support services
Compass Group, UK and Ireland Limited
Holding company
Foodbuy Europe Limited
(iii)(iv)
Client procurement services management in the UK
Compass House, Guildford Street, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 9BQ, UK
Compass Group Holdings PLC
(i)(iii)
Holding company and corporate activities
Hospitality Holdings Limited
(i)
Intermediate holding company
Principal subsidiaries
Principal activities
Country of Incorporation: US
2710 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150N, Sacramento, CA 95833-3505, US
Bon Appétit Management Co.
(viii)
Food service
251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808, US
Compass Group USA Investments Inc.
Holding company
Compass Group USA, Inc.
(viii)
Food and support services
Crothall Services Group
Support services to the healthcare market
Foodbuy, LLC
Purchasing services in North America
Restaurant Associates Corp.
Fine dining facilities
80 State Street, Albany, NY 12207-2543, US
Flik International Corp.
Fine dining facilities
801 Adlai Stevenson Drive, Springfield, IL 62703, US
Levy Restaurants Limited Partnership
Fine dining and food service at sports and entertainment facilities
2 Sun Court, Suite 400, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092, US
Morrison Management Specialists, Inc.
(viii)
Food service to the healthcare and senior living market
Country of Incorporation: Algeria
Eurojapan Résidence No.23, RN n°3 BP 398, Hassi Messaoud, Algeria
Eurest Algerie SPA
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Angola
Condominio Dolce Vita, Via S8, Edifício 1D, Fração A & B, 2º andar, Talatona, Município de Belas, Luanda, República de Angola
Express Support Services, Limitada
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Argentina
Esteban Echeverría 1050, 6th floor, Vicente Lopez (1602), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Servicios Compass de Argentina S.A.
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Australia
Ground Floor 35 – 51 Mitchell Street, McMahons Point, NSW 2060, Australia
28 Villages Pty Ltd
Food and support services
Compass (Australia) Catering & Services PTY Ltd
(iii)(iv)
Food and support services
Compass Group B&I Hospitality Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Compass Group Defence Hospitality Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Compass Group Education Hospitality Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Compass Group Healthcare Hospitality Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Compass Group Health Services Pty Ltd
Food and support services
Compass Group Management Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Compass Group Relief Hospitality Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Compass Group Remote Hospitality Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Delta Facilities Management PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Delta FM Australia PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Eurest (Australia) Food Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Eurest (Australia) PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Foodbuy Pty Ltd
Food and support services
HEC Hospitality Services Pty Ltd
Food and support services
Omega Security Services PTY Ltd
Food and support services
Village Hospitality Holdings Pty Ltd
Food and support services
Village Hospitality Services Pty Ltd
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Austria
IZD Tower, Wagramer Strasse 19/4. Stock, 1220 Wien, Austria
Compass Group Austria Holdings One GmbH
Food and support services
Compass Group Austria Holdings Two GmbH
Food and support services
Eurest Restaurationsbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H
Food and support services
Kunz Gebäudereinigung GmbH
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Belgium
1831 Diegem, Hermeslaan 1H, Belgium
Compass Group Service Solutions NV
Food and support services
F.L.R. Holding NV
(ii)
Holding company
Xandrion Belgie BV
Boomseseenweg 28, 2627 Schelle, Belgium
J&M Catering Services NV
Food and support services
Flinckheuvel BV
Food and support services
Silverspoon BV
Gemeentepark 5, 2930 Brasschaat, Belgium
Kasteel Van Brasschaat NV
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Brazil
Rua Werner Von Siemens 111, Building 11 (Tower A), Floor 15, Suite 152, Lapa de Baixo, 05.069-900, Brazil
Clean Mall Serviços Ltda.
Food and support services
Foodbuy Alimentos Sociedade Unipessoal Ltda.
Food and support services
Rua Werner Von Siemens, 111, Building 11 (Tower A), mezzanine, Lapa de Baixo, 05.069-900, Brazil
GR Manutenção e Facilites Sociedade Unipessoal Ltda.
Food and support services
Rua Werner Von Siemens 111, Building 11 (Tower A), Floor 15, Suite 151 - parte, Lapa de Baixo, 05.069-900, Brazil
GRSA Serviços LTDA.
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: British Virgin Islands
Craigmuir Chambers, PO Box 71, Roadtown, Tortola, VG1110, British Virgin Islands
Compass Group Holdings (BVI) Limited
Holding company
Country of Incorporation: Cambodia
c/o Action Group Ltd., No.12, Street 614, Sangkat Boeung Kok II, Khan Tuol Kork, Phnom Penh City, Cambodia
Compass Group (Cambodia) Co. Ltd.
(ii)
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Cameroon
100, Rue n° 1044 Hydrocarbures, Bonapriso, BP 5767, Douala, Cameroon
Eurest Cameroun SARL
(ii)
Food and support services
Eurest Camp Logistics Cameroun SARL
(ii)
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Canada
12 Kodiak Crescent, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 3G5, Canada
Imperial Coffee and Services Inc.
(iii)(iv)(v)
Food and support services
1 Prologis Boulevard, Suite 400, Mississauga, Ontario L5W 0G2, Canada
Canteen of Canada Limited
(iii)
Food and support services
Compass Canada Support Services Ltd
(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(viii)
Food and support services
Compass Group Canada Operations Ltd
(iii)
Food and support services
Umbrel Hospitality Group Inc.
(iii)
Food and support services
1600-421 7 AVE SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 4K9, Canada
McMurray Coin Machines (1983) Ltd.
Food and support services
1969 Upper Water Street, Purdy’s Wharf Tower II, Suite 1300, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3R7, Canada
Crothall Services Canada Inc.
(iii)(iv)
Food and support services
5B rue De Montgolfier, Boucherville, Québec, J4B 8C4, Canada
Caf-Caf Inc.
(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)
Food and support services
1959 Upper Water Street, Suite 1100, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 3E5, Canada
East Coast Catering (NS) Limited
(iii)
Food and support services
30 Queen’s Road, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 2A5, Canada
East Coast Catering Limited
(iii)(iv)(viii)(v)
Food and support services
Long Harbour Catering Limited Partnership
(x)
Food and support services
Long Harbour Catering Limited
(iii)(viii)
Food and support services
421 7th Avenue SW, Suite 1600, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 4K9, Canada
Great West Catering Ltd.
(iii)
Food and support services
Tamarack Catering Ltd.
(iii)
Food and support services
2580 Rue Dollard, Lasalle, Quebec, H8N 1T2, Canada
Groupe Compass (Québec) Ltée
(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(viii)
Food and support services
550 Burrard Street, Suite 2300, Bentall 5, P.O. Box 30, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2B5, Canada
Town Square Food Services Ltd.
(iii)
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Chile
Av. Las Condes 11.774, 7th floor, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile
Cadelsur S.A.
Food and support services
Compass Catering S.A.
Food and support services
Compass Servicios S.A.
Food and support services
Scolarest S.A.
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: China
Room 501 (namely Room 601), Building 2, No. 317, Longwen Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200232, China
Compass (China) Management Services Company Limited
Management services
Room 503 (namely Room 603), Building 2, No. 317, Longwen Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200232, China
Shanghai Eurest Food Technologies Service Co., Ltd.
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Colombia
Calle 98#11B – 29 Bogotá - Colombia
Compass Group Services Colombia S.A.
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Congo
Enceinte de Brometo Centre Ville, BP 5208, Pointe-Noire, The Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eurest Services Congo SARL
(ii)
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Cyprus
195, Arch. Makariou III Avenue, Neocleous House, 3030 Limassol, Cyprus
ESS Design & Build Ltd
(ii)
Support services
Eurest Support Services (Cyprus) International Ltd
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: France
123 Avenue de la République – Hall A, 92320 Châtillon, France
Academie Formation Groupe Compass SAS
Training services
Caterine Restauration SAS
Food and support services
Delisaveurs SAS
Food and support services
Eurest Sports & Loisirs SAS
Food and support services
La Puyfolaise de Restauration SAS
Food and support services
Levy Restaurants France SAS
Food and support services
Mediance SAS
Food and support services
Memonett SAS
Food and support services
Servirest SAS
Food and support services
SHRM Angola SAS
(ii)
Food and support services
Société Nouvelle Lecocq SAS
Food and support services
Sud Est Traiteur SAS
Food and support services
Rue des Artisans, ZA de Bel Air, 12000 Rodez, France
Central Restauration Martel (CRM)
Food and support services
Zone Artisanale, 40500 Bas Mauco, France
Culinaire Des Pays de L’Adour SAS
Food and support services
40, Bd de Dunkerque, 13002 Marseille, France
Société International D’Assistance SA
(ii)
Support services
Lieu Dit la Prade, 81580 Soual, France
Occitanie Restauration SAS
Food and support services
3 rue Camille Claudel Atlanparc Bat.M, Zone Kerluherne, CS 20043, 56890 Plescop, France
Oceane de Restauration SAS
Food and support services
Rue Eugène Sué, Zone Industrielle de Blanzat, 03100 Montluçon, France
Sogirest SAS
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Gabon
ZONE OPRAG, (Face á Bernabé Nouveau Port), BP 1292, Port Gentil, Gabon
Eurest Support Services Gabon SA
(ii)
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Germany
Adolphsplatz 1, 20457 Hamburg, Germany
Maison van den Boer Deutschland GmbH
Food and support services
Helfmann-Park 2, 65760, Eschborn, Germany
Compass Group GmbH
Food and support services
Eurest Süd GmbH
Food and support services
Food affairs GmbH
Food and support services
Foodbuy CE GmbH
Food and support services
Kanne Café GmbH
Food and support services
Medirest GmbH
Food and support services
MU Catering Bremen GmbH
Food and support services
Royal Business Restaurants GmbH
Food and support services
S.B. Verwaltungs GmbH
Holding company
Kallstadter Str. 1, 68309 Mannheim, Germany
Eurest Mannheim GmbH
Food and support services
Konrad-Zuse-Platz 2, 81829 München, Germany
Leonardi HPM GmbH
Food and support services
Leonardi GmbH & Co. KG
Food and support services
Leonardi Kaffee neu entdecken GmbH & Co. KG
Food and support services
Leonardi SVM GmbH
Food and support services
Levy Restaurants GmbH
Food and support services
Sankt-Florian-Weg 1, 30880, Laatzen, Germany
orgaMed Betriebsgesellschaft für Zentralsterilisationen GmbH
Food and support services
PLURAL Gebäudemanagement GmbH
Food and support services
PLURAL Personalservice GmbH
Food and support services
PLURAL Servicepool GmbH
Food and support services
Pfaffenwiese, 65929 Frankfurt/M., Germany
LPS Event Gastronomie GmbH
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Guernsey
PO Box 119, Martello Court, Admiral Park, St Peter Port, GY1 3HB, Guernsey
Compass Group Finance Ltd
Financial services
Country of Incorporation: Hong Kong
Room 805, 8/F, New Kowloon Plaza, 38 Tai Kok Tsui Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Compass Group Hong Kong Ltd
Food and support services
Encore Catering Ltd
Food and support services
Shing Hin Catering Group Ltd
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: India
7th Floor, Tower B, Spaze I - Tech Park, Sector 49, Sohna Road, Gurgaon – 122018, India
Compass Group (India) Private Limited
Food and support services
Compass India Food Services Private Limited
Food and support services
Country of Incorporation: Ireland
3rd Floor, 43a, Yeats Way, Parkwest Business Park, Dublin 12,# Details of related undertakings of Compass Group PLC continued
Unit 3, Northwest Business Park, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
Tower House, Loch Promenade, Douglas, IM1 2LZ, Isle of Man
Hamarikyu Kensetsu Plaza, 5-5-12, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
44 Esplanade, St Helier, JE4 9WG, Jersey
060011, Atyrauskaya Oblast, Atyrau City, Beibarys Sultan Avenue 506, Kazakhstan
209/8919 Sigma Road Off Enterprises Road, PO BOX 14 662, Nairobi, Kenya
1-5 rue de I’Innovation, L-1896 Kockelscheuer, Luxembourg
Level 21, Suite 21.01, The Gardens South Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
50-8-1, TKT.8, Wsima UOA Damansara, 50 Jalan. Dungun, Damansara Heights, Kuala Lumpur, 50490, Malaysia
Calle Jaime Balmes 11, Oficina 101 letra D, Colonia Los Morales Polanco, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, 11510 Ciudad de México, Mexico
251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808, USA
Haaksbergweg 70, 1101 BZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Middenweg 168e, 1782BL Den Helder, Netherlands
De Amert 207, 5462GH, Veghel, Netherlands
Luzernestraat 57, 2153 GM, Nieuw-Vennep, Netherlands
Stationsweg 95, 6711 PM Ede, Netherlands
85 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, Immeuble Carcopino 3000, BP 2353, 98846 Nouméa Cedex, New Caledonia
Level 3, 7-11 Kenwyn Street, Parnell, Auckland, 1052, New Zealand
Drengsrudbekken 12, 1383, PO Box 74, NO-1371, Asker, Norway
Forusparken 2, 4031 Stavanger, Postboks 8083 Stavanger Postterminal, 4068, Stavanger, Norway
c/o Warner Shand Lawyers Waigani, Level 1 RH Hypermarket, Allotment 1 Section 479 (off Kennedy Road), Gordons NCD, Papua New Guinea
Unit 2410 24th flr, City & Land Mega Plaza, ADB Ave., Ortigas Ctr., San Antonio, Pasig City 1605, Philippines
Ul. Olbrachta 94, 01-102 Warszawa, Poland
Edíficio Prime, Avenida da, Quinta Grande, 53-60, Alfragide 2614-521 Amadora, Portugal
82 Ubi Avenue 4, #07-03 Edward Boustead Centre, 408832, Singapore
8 Marina Boulevard, # 05-02, Marina Bay Financial Centre, 018981, Singapore
Calle Frederic Mompou 5, planta 5a, Edificio Euro 3, 08960, San Just Desvern, Barcelona, Spain
Calle Castilla 8-10 – C.P. 50.009, Zaragoza, Spain
Calle Pinar de San José 98, Planta 1a, 28054, Madrid, Spain
Poligono Ugaldeguren 1, Parcela 7, 48160 Derio (Vizcaya), Spain
Calle R, s/n, Mercapalma, 07007 Palma de Mallorca, Baleares, Spain
Box 1183, 171 23 Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
c/o Deloitte AB, 113 79, Stockholm, Sweden
c/o BDO AG, Industriestrasse 53 6312 Steinhausen, Switzerland
Gwattstrasse 8, 3185 Schmitten FR, Switzerland
Ünalan Mah. Libadiye Cad. Emaar Square Sit. F Blok No:82F/73 Üsküdar Istanbul, Türkiye
Ünalan Mah. Libadiye Cad. Emaar Square Sit. F Blok No:82F/78 Üsküdar Istanbul, Türkiye
Ünalan Mah. Libadiye Cad. Emaar Square Sit. F Blok No:82F/74 Üsküdar Istanbul, Türkiye
Dubai Airport Free Zone, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Parklands Court, 24 Parklands, Birmingham Great Park, Rubery, Birmingham, B45 9PZ, UK
Compass House, Guildford Street, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 9BQ, UK
Suite D, Pavilion 7 Kingshill Park, Venture Drive, Arnhill Business Park, Westhill, Aberdeenshire, AB32 6FL, UK
1st Floor, 12 Cromac Quay, Cromac Wood, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT7 2JD, UK
Country of Incorporation: US
2710 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150N, Sacramento, CA 95833-3505, US
211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620, Austin, TX 78701-3218, US
2345 Rice Street, Suite 230, Roseville, MN 55113, US
84 State Street, Boston, MA 02109, US
7 St. Paul Street, Suite 820, Baltimore, MD 21202, US
251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808, US
801 Adlai Stevenson Drive, Springfield, IL 62703, US
508 Meeting Street, West Columbia, SC 29169, US
450 Laurel Street, 8th Floor, Baton Rouge, LA 70801, US
80 State Street, Albany, NY 12207-2543, US
2626 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 550, Raleigh, NC 27608, US
2595 Interstate Drive, Suite 103, Harrisburg, PA 17110, US
3366 Riverside Drive, Suite 103, Upper Arlington, OH 43221, US
40 Technology Pkwy South, #300, Norcross, GA 30092, US
221 Bolivar Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101, US
Princeton South Corporate Ctr, Suite 160, 100 Charles Ewing Blvd, Ewing, NJ 08628, US
300 Deschutes Way SW, Suite 208, Tumwater, WA 98501, US
2900 SW Wanamaker Drive, Suite 204, Topeka, KS 66614, US
8825 N. 23rd Avenue, Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85021, US
2908 Poston Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203, US
8585 Old Dairy Road, Suite 208, Juneau, AK 99801, US
600 S, 2nd Street, Suite 155, Bismarck, ND 58504, US
2 Sun Court, Suite 400, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092, US
Country of Incorporation: Australia
Level 3, 12 Newcastle Street, Perth 6000, Australia
Country of Incorporation: Canada
1 Prologis Boulevard, Suite 400, Mississauga, Ontario, L5W 0G2, Canada
30 Queen’s Road, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 2A5, Canada
Clearwater River Dene Nation Reserve No. 222, P.O. Box 5050, Clearwater, Saskatchewan, S0M 3H0, Canada
77 King Street West, No.# Other subsidiaries, joint arrangements, memberships, associates and other significant holdings
| % Holding | Country of Incorporation | |
|---|---|---|
| 33.4 | Canada | O&B Yonge Richmond LP* |
| 1600-421 7 AVE SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 4K9, Canada | Rimfire Solutions Ltd. | |
| 45 | Finland | Keskussairaalantie Opinkivi 2, 40600 Jyväskylä, Finland |
| 49 | Finland | Linnankatu 26 A 41, 20100, Turku, Finland |
| 99.8 | France | Le Puy Du Fou, 85590 Les Epesses, France |
| 49 | Germany | Steenbeker Weg 25, 24106, Kiel, Germany |
| 79.55 | India | 1st Floor, VK Kalyani Commercial Complex, Sankey Rd, Opp: BDA Head Office, Bengaluru, Kamataka, 560020, India |
| 79.55 | India | |
| 90 | Japan | Hamarikyu Kensetsu Plaza, 5-5-12, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan |
| 50 | Japan | 5-7-5, Chiyoda, Naka-ku, Nagoya-City, Aichi-Prefecture, 460-0012, Japan |
| 50 | Kazakhstan | 060011, Atyrauskaya Oblast, Atyrau city, Beibarys Sultan avenue 506, Kazakhstan |
| 60 | Kazakhstan | 060011, Old Airport Road 64, Atyrau City, Atyrau Oblast, Republic of Kazakhstan |
| 25 | Luxembourg | 39 Boulevard Joseph, II L-1840, Luxembourg |
| 49 | Malaysia | Suite 1301, 13th Floor, City Plaza Jalan Tebrau, 80300 Johor Bahru Johor, Malaysia |
| 99.99 | Monaco | 1 Avenue Henri Dunant, Palais De La Scala, 3eme, Etage – No 1125, 98000 MC, Monaco |
| 100 | Netherlands | Haaksbergweg 70, 1101 BZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| 33.33 | Norway | Okesnoyveien 16, 1366, Lysaker, 1366, Norway |
| 33.33 | Norway | Harbitzalléen 2A, 0275 Oslo, PÅ Box 4148, Sjølyst, 0217 Oslo, Norway |
| % Holding | Country of Incorporation | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Papua New Guinea | c/o Warner Shand Lawyers Waigani, Level 1 RH Hypermarket, Allotment 1 Section 479 (off Kennedy Road), Gordons NCD, Papua New Guinea |
| 50 | Papua New Guinea | |
| 20 | Qatar | 2 Floor, Al Mana Commercial Tower, C-Ring road, Doha, PO BOX 22481, Qatar |
| 30 | Saudi Arabia | 3927, Al Khobar, Street Prince Sultan, Al Jawhara Dist 9618, Saudi Arabia |
| 99 | Spain | Calle Pinar de San José 98, Planta 1a, 28054, Madrid, Spain |
| 50 | UAE | Office No. 209, Mawilah, Al Sharjah, P O Box: 1897, United Arab Emirates |
| 50 | UAE | Abu Dhabi National Hotels Company Building, Sheikh Rashid Bin Saeed Al Maktoum Street, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates |
| 50 | UAE | Hotel owned by Emaar Properties, Building No. 1, Parcel ID 392-497, Dubai Marina, United Arab Emirates |
| 99 | UK | Parklands Court, 24 Parklands, Birmingham Great Park, Rubery, Birmingham, B45 9PZ, United Kingdom |
| 25 | UK | County Ground, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B5 7QU, United Kingdom |
| 50 | UK | 67 Shrivenham Hundred Business Park Majors Road, Watchfield, Swindon, Oxfordshire, SN6 8TY, United Kingdom |
| 50 | UK | Lower Ground 04 Edinburgh House, 154-182 Kennington Lane, London, SE11 5DP, United Kingdom |
| 50 | UK | |
| 15.53 | UK | Rugby House Twickenham Stadium, 200 Whitton Road, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW2 7BA, United Kingdom |
| 37.5 | UK | 1 The Oval, Kennington, London, SE11 5SS |
| 37.5 | UK | |
| 33.9 | UK | 1st Floor 4 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4LU, United Kingdom |
| 33.9 | UK | |
| 33.9 | UK | |
| 33.9 | UK | |
| 33.9 | UK | |
| 33.9 | UK | Clere House, 3 Chapel Place, London, EC2A 3DQ, United Kingdom |
| % Holding | Country of Incorporation | |
|---|---|---|
| 33.9 | US | 945 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, US |
| 99 | US | 7 St. Paul Street, Suite 820, Baltimore, |
| 74 | US | 84 State Street, Boston, MA 02109, US |
| 90 | US | 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808, US |
| 90 | US | |
| 90 | US | |
| 90 | US | |
| 62.5 | US | |
| 50 | US | |
| 50 | US | |
| 49 | US | |
| 49 | US | |
| 49 | US | |
| 42 | US | Chicago Restaurant Partners, LLC |
| 30 | US | 1209 Orange St., Wilmington, DE 19801, US |
| 50.1 | US | 1090 Vermont Ave N.W., Washington, DC 20005, US |
| 60 | US | 2710 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150N, Sacramento, CA 95833-3505, US |
| 49 | US | 4605 Duke Drive, Suite 110, Mason, OH 45040, US |
| 80 | US | 980 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60611, US |
| 75 | US | |
| 50 | US | |
| 50 | US | |
| 80 | US | 8585 Old Dairy Road, Suite 208, Juneau, AK 99801, US |
| 50 | US | |
| 49 | US | 80 State Street, Albany, NY 12207- 2543, US |
| 25 | US | 7901 Fourth St. N. STE 300, St. Petersburg, FL 33702, US |
| 38 | US | Corporation Trust Centre, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801, US |
Notes:
1. As a percentage of nominal value of total share capital in issue.
2. Unless otherwise stated, indirectly owned by Compass Group PLC, active status and ordinary shares issued.
3. Unless stated otherwise, 100% owned.
4. In some of the jurisdictions where we operate, share classes are not defined and in these instances, for the purposes of disclosure, we have classified these holdings as ordinary.
5. A number of the companies listed are legacy companies which no longer serve any operational purpose.
Classifications key:
(i) Directly owned by Compass Group PLC
(ii) Dormant/non-trading
(iii) A Ordinary shares
(iv) B Ordinary shares
(v) C Ordinary and/or Special shares
(vi) D, E and/or F Ordinary shares
(vii) Deferred shares
(viii) Preference including cumulative, non- cumulative and redeemable shares
(ix) Redeemable shares
(x) No share capital, share of profits
(xi) Limited by guarantee
220
| 30 September | Notes | 2023 £m | |
| Compass Group PLC | |||
| Fixed assets | |||
| Investments in subsidiary undertakings | 2 | 6,714 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Debtors: amounts falling due within one year | 3 | 2,034 | |
| Debtors: amounts falling due after more than one year | 3 | 5,993 | |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 434 | ||
| Current assets | 8,461 | ||
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | |||
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | 4 | (9,271) | |
| Net current (liabilities)/assets | (810) | ||
| Total assets less current liabilities | 5,904 | ||
| Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year | |||
| Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year | 4 | (2,500) | |
| Provisions | (3) | ||
| Net assets | 3,401 | ||
| Equity | |||
| Share capital | 6 | 198 | |
| Share premium | 189 | ||
| Capital redemption reserve | 295 | ||
| Own shares reserve | (1,513) | ||
| Retained earnings | 1 | 4,232 | |
| Total equity | 3,401 |
Approved by the Board of Directors on 20 November 2023 and signed on its behalf by:
Dominic Blakemore, Director
Palmer Brown, Director
222
222
| 30 September | Notes | 2023 £m | |
| Compass Group PLC | |||
| Fixed assets | |||
| Investments in subsidiary undertakings | 2 | 6,714 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Debtors: amounts falling due within one year | 3 | 2,034 | |
| Debtors: amounts falling due after more than one year | 3 | 5,993 | |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 434 | ||
| Current assets | 8,461 | ||
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | |||
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | 4 | (9,271) | |
| Net current (liabilities)/assets | (810) | ||
| Total assets less current liabilities | 5,904 | ||
| Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year | |||
| Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year | 4 | (2,500) | |
| Provisions | (3) | ||
| Net assets | 3,401 | ||
| Equity | |||
| Share capital | 6 | 198 | |
| Share premium | 189 | ||
| Capital redemption reserve | 295 | ||
| Own shares reserve | (1,513) | ||
| Retained earnings | 1 | 4,232 | |
| Total equity | 3,401 |
| Equity | Share capital £m | Share premium £m | Capital redemption reserve £m | Own shares reserve £m | Share-based payment reserve £m | Retained earnings 1 £m | Total £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2021 | 198 | 189 | 295 | – | 271 | 3,125 | 4,078 |
| Profit for the year | – | – | – | – | – | 764 | 764 |
| Fair value of share-based payments | – | – | – | – | 34 | – | 34 |
| Release of share awards settled i n existing shares purchased in the market | – | – | – | – | (4) | – | (4) |
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback 2 | – | – | – | (502) | – | – | (502) |
| Transfer 3 | – | – | – | (13) | (301) | 314 | – |
| Dividends paid to shareholders 4 | – | – | – | – | – | (418) | (418) |
| At 30 September 2022 | 198 | 189 | 295 | (515) | – | 3,785 | 3,952 |
| Own shares held by the Compass Group PLC All Share Schemes Trust | – | – | – | (4) | – | – | (4) |
| Profit for the year | – | – | – | – | – | 1,077 | 1,077 |
| Fair value of share-based payments | – | – | – | – | 44 | – | 44 |
| Cost of shares transferred to employees | – | – | – | 26 | – | (26) | – |
| Purchase of own shares – share buyback 2 | – | – | – | (1,004) | – | – | (1,004) |
| Purchase of own shares – employee share-based payments | – | – | – | (16) | – | – | (16) |
| Dividends paid to shareholders 4 | – | – | – | – | – | (648) | (648) |
| At 30 September 2023 | 198 | 189 | 295 | (1,513) | – | 4,232 | 3,401 |
The accompanying notes form part of these Parent Company financial statements.
The nominal value of shares in the Company purchased and subsequently cancelled is shown as a reduction in share capital and an equal and opposite transfer to the capital redemption reserve.
The own shares reserve represents shares in Compass Group PLC held either in treasury, including transaction costs, or by employee share trusts to satisfy liabilities to employees for long-term incentive plans. Own shares are treated as a deduction to equity until the shares are cancelled, reissued or sold, at which point they are transferred to retained earnings.
The own shares reserve comprises £1,501m in respect of 70,170,859 shares in Compass Group PLC held in treasury and £12m in respect of 573,223 shares in Compass Group PLC held by the Compass Group PLC All Share Schemes Trust (ASST).
The share buyback announced in November 2022 was completed in March 2023, with 13,127,521 shares repurchased during the year for a total price, including transaction costs, of £251m. Transaction costs of £1m were incurred in respect of the 3,447,549 shares repurchased during the year in respect of the completion of the share buyback announced in May 2022.
In May 2023, the Company announced that it was commencing a further share buyback to repurchase up to £750m of its own shares. During the year, 29,736,882 shares were repurchased for a total price, including transaction costs, of £621m, of which £600m was paid in cash during the year. The mandate issued to the broker to purchase the shares was irrevocable at 30 September 2023 and, therefore, a creditor of £131m in respect of the value of the shares not yet purchased has been recognised. The share buyback was completed in November and, in total, 36,094,092 shares were repurchased under the programme for a total price, including transaction costs, of £752m.
The ASST is a discretionary trust for the benefit of employees and the shares held are used to satisfy some of the Group’s liabilities to employees for long-term incentive plans. During the year, 800,000 shares in Compass Group PLC were purchased by the ASST and 448,686 shares were released from the ASST to satisfy awards under the Company’s long-term incentive plans. At 30 September 2023, the nominal value of the shares in the ASST was £63,341, with a market value of £11m.
No shares have been released from treasury or by the ASST since the end of the financial year to the date of this Report to satisfy awards under the Company’s long-term incentive plans.
223
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
224
The separate financial statements of Compass Group PLC (the Company) have been prepared on a going concern basis, as discussed on page 151, in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework (FRS 101). The separate financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of certain financial instruments.
In preparing these financial statements, the Company applies the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements of UK- adopted International Accounting Standards, but makes amendments where necessary to comply with the Companies Act 2006 and has set out below where advantage of the FRS 101 disclosure exemptions has been taken.
The financial statements present information about the Company as an individual undertaking, not as a Group undertaking, and are included in the Compass Group PLC consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023. As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has not presented its own income statement. The amount of profit for the year of the Company is disclosed in the Parent Company balance sheet and statement of changes in equity.
In these financial statements, the Company has applied the exemptions under FRS 101 in respect of the following disclosures:
* cash flow statement and related notes
* financial instruments and fair values
* share-based payments
* transactions with wholly-owned subsidiaries
* compensation of key management personnel
* capital management
* the effect of new but not yet effective accounting standards
The significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of these separate financial statements are set out below. These policies have been applied consistently to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
There have been no significant changes in accounting policies during the year.
Investments are stated at cost less provision for any impairment. In the opinion of the directors, the value of such investments is not less than shown at the balance sheet date.
Investment income is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. It represents dividend income which is recognised when the right to receive payment is established.
Assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rates of exchange ruling at the year-end. Gains and losses arising on retranslation are included in the income statement for the period.
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised on the Company’s balance sheet when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument and derecognised when it ceases to be party to such provisions. Financial assets are classified as current if they are expected to be received within 12 months of the balance sheet date. Financial liabilities are classified as current if they are legally due to be paid within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Financial assets and liabilities are initially recorded at fair value including, where permitted by IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, any directly attributable transaction costs. For those financial assets that are not subsequently held at fair value, the carrying amounts are reduced by a provision equal to the lifetime expected credit losses using historic and forward-looking data on credit risk.
The Company classifies its financial assets and liabilities into the following categories:
* financial assets and liabilities at amortised cost
* financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Where financial assets or liabilities are eligible to be carried at either amortised cost or fair value, the Company does not apply the fair value option. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Derivative instruments utilised include interest rate swaps, currency swaps and forward currency contracts. The Company and Group policy is disclosed in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
Parent Company financial statements
224
224 Consolidated financial statements
The separate financial statements of Compass Group PLC (the Company) have been prepared on a going concern basis, as discussed on page 151, in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework (FRS 101). The separate financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of certain financial instruments.
In preparing these financial statements, the Company applies the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements of UK- adopted International Accounting Standards, but makes amendments where necessary to comply with the Companies Act 2006 and has set out below where advantage of the FRS 101 disclosure exemptions has been taken.# Notes to the Parent Company financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023
The financial statements present information about the Company as an individual undertaking, not as a Group undertaking, and are included in the Compass Group PLC consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2023. As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has not presented its own income statement. The amount of profit for the year of the Company is disclosed in the Parent Company balance sheet and statement of changes in equity.
In these financial statements, the Company has applied the exemptions under FRS 101 in respect of the following disclosures:
– cash flow statement and related notes
– financial instruments and fair values
– share-based payments
– transactions with wholly-owned subsidiaries
– compensation of key management personnel
– capital management
– the effect of new but not yet effective accounting standards
The significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of these separate financial statements are set out below. These policies have been applied consistently to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
There have been no significant changes in accounting policies during the year.
Investments are stated at cost less provision for any impairment. In the opinion of the directors, the value of such investments is not less than shown at the balance sheet date.
Investment income is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. It represents dividend income which is recognised when the right to receive payment is established.
Assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the rates of exchange ruling at the year-end. Gains and losses arising on retranslation are included in the income statement for the period.
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised on the Company’s balance sheet when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument and derecognised when it ceases to be party to such provisions. Financial assets are classified as current if they are expected to be received within 12 months of the balance sheet date. Financial liabilities are classified as current if they are legally due to be paid within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Financial assets and liabilities are initially recorded at fair value including, where permitted by IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, any directly attributable transaction costs. For those financial assets that are not subsequently held at fair value, the carrying amounts are reduced by a provision equal to the lifetime expected credit losses using historic and forward-looking data on credit risk.
The Company classifies its financial assets and liabilities into the following categories:
– financial assets and liabilities at amortised cost
– financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Where financial assets or liabilities are eligible to be carried at either amortised cost or fair value, the Company does not apply the fair value option.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Derivative instruments utilised include interest rate swaps, currency swaps and forward currency contracts. The Company and Group policy is disclosed in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 225
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated at amortised cost unless they are part of a fair value hedge accounting relationship. Borrowings that are part of a fair value hedge accounting relationship are measured at amortised cost adjusted for the fair value attributable to the risk being hedged.
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings are initially measured at fair value and are subsequently reported at amortised cost. Provisions on intra-group receivables are calculated at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses using historic and forward-looking data on credit risk.
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings are initially measured at fair value and are subsequently reported at amortised cost. Non-interest-bearing payables are stated at their nominal value as they are due on demand.
Interim dividends are recognised in the financial statements when they are paid. Final dividends, which are subject to approval by the shareholders in a general meeting after the balance sheet date, are not included as a liability in the financial statements. Instead, they are disclosed as a post-balance sheet event and recognised in the financial statements when they are approved (see note 7).
Deferred tax is provided at the anticipated rates on temporary differences arising from the inclusion of items of income and expenditure in tax computations in periods different from those in which they are included in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is regarded as more likely than not that they will be recovered.
The Company issues equity-settled share-based payments to certain employees which are measured at fair value at the date of grant using option pricing models. The fair value is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the Company’s estimate of the number of shares expected to vest. The issue of share incentives by the Company to employees of its subsidiaries represents additional capital contributions. An addition to the Company’s investment in subsidiary undertakings is reported with a corresponding increase in shareholders’ funds. For details of the charge, see note 26 to the consolidated financial statements.
Financial guarantee contract liabilities are measured initially at their fair values. These liabilities are subsequently measured at the higher of the expected credit loss determined under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and the initial fair value.
225Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
226 Consolidated financial statements
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| At 1 October | 1,106 | 1,075 |
| Additions | 5,570 | – |
| Share-based payments to employees of subsidiaries | 44 | 34 |
| Recharged to subsidiaries during the year | (5) | (3) |
| At 30 September | 6,715 | 1,106 |
| Provisions | ||
| At 1 October and 30 September | (1) | (1) |
| Net book value | ||
| At 30 September | 6,714 | 1,105 |
During the year, the Company subscribed for shares in a direct subsidiary company, Hospitality Holdings Limited, for consideration totalling £5.6bn as part of a restructuring of certain intra-group loans which resulted in an increase in investments in subsidiary undertakings of £5.6bn and a corresponding change in balances with subsidiary undertakings.
On the basis that the Company’s investments in subsidiary undertakings mainly comprise an investment in Hospitality Holdings Limited, which indirectly owns all of the Company’s trading businesses, there are no indicators that the carrying value may be impaired. The principal subsidiary undertakings are listed in note 36 to the consolidated financial statements.
| Notes | Falling due within one year £m | Falling due after more than one year £m | Total £m | Falling due within one year £m | Falling due after more than one year £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | 2022 | 2022 | 2022 | ||
| Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings | 2,016 | 5,948 | 7,964 | 2,681 | 8,018 | 10,699 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 5 | 18 | 45 | 63 | 71 | 76 | 147 |
| Total | 2,034 | 5,993 | 8,027 | 2,752 | 8,094 | 10,846 |
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings may be interest-free or interest-bearing loans. Interest-free loans are repayable on demand. Interest-bearing loans incur interest at fixed rates (between 4.0% and 7.25%) or various floating rates with margins ranging from -0.15% to +1.50% (subject to a minimum all-in rate of 0%) and have maturities ranging from repayable on demand up to May 2031. The book value of amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings falling due within one year approximates to fair value due to the short-term nature of these receivables. The fair value of amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings falling due after more than one year is £5,556m (2022: £7,452m). Details of the derivative financial instruments are shown in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
| Notes | Falling due within one year £m | Falling due after more than one year £m | Total £m | Falling due within one year £m | Falling due after more than one year £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | 2022 | 2022 | 2022 | ||
| Issued debt | 5 | 288 | 1,510 | 1,798 | 439 | 1,847 | 2,286 |
| Bank overdrafts | 5 | 410 | – | 410 | 350 | – | 350 |
| Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings | 5 | 8,341 | 773 | 9,114 | 4,996 | 1,424 | 6,420 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 5 | 37 | 207 | 244 | 6 | 237 | 243 |
| Other payables | 1 | 152 | – | 152 | 77 | – | 77 |
| Accruals | 25 | – | 25 | 25 | 32 | – | 32 |
| Current tax | 18 | – | 18 | 18 | 28 | – | 28 |
| Deferred tax | 2 | – | 10 | 10 | – | 19 | 19 |
| Total | 9,271 | 2,500 | 11,771 | 5,928 | 3,527 | 9,455 |
2 Investments in subsidiary undertakings
| 2023 £m | 2022 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| At 1 October | 1,106 | 1,075 |
| Additions | 5,570 | – |
| Share-based payments to employees of subsidiaries | 44 | 34 |
| Recharged to subsidiaries during the year | (5) | (3) |
| At 30 September | 6,715 | 1,106 |
| Provisions | ||
| At 1 October and 30 September | (1) | (1) |
| Net book value | ||
| At 30 September | 6,714 | 1,105 |
During the year, the Company subscribed for shares in a direct subsidiary company, Hospitality Holdings Limited, for consideration totalling £5.6bn as part of a restructuring of certain intra-group loans which resulted in an increase in investments in subsidiary undertakings of £5.6bn and a corresponding change in balances with subsidiary undertakings. On the basis that the Company’s investments in subsidiary undertakings mainly comprise an investment in Hospitality Holdings Limited, which indirectly owns all of the Company’s trading businesses, there are no indicators that the carrying value may be impaired. The principal subsidiary undertakings are listed in note 36 to the consolidated financial statements.
3 Debtors
| Falling due within one year £m | Falling due after more than one year £m | Total £m | Falling due within one year £m | Falling due after more than one year £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtors Notes | ||||||
| Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings | 2,016 | 5,948 | 7,964 | 2,681 | 8,018 | 10,699 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 5 | 18 | 45 | 63 | 71 | 147 |
| Total | 2,034 | 5,993 | 8,027 | 2,752 | 8,094 | 10,846 |
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings may be interest-free or interest-bearing loans. Interest-free loans are repayable on demand. Interest-bearing loans incur interest at fixed rates (between 4.0% and 7.25%) or various floating rates with margins ranging from -0.15% to +1.50% (subject to a minimum all-in rate of 0%) and have maturities ranging from repayable on demand up to May 2031. The book value of amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings falling due within one year approximates to fair value due to the short-term nature of these receivables. The fair value of amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings falling due after more than one year is £5,556m (2022: £7,452m). Details of the derivative financial instruments are shown in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
4 Creditors
| Falling due within one year £m | Falling due after more than one year £m | Total £m | Falling due within one year £m | Falling due after more than one year £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creditors Notes | ||||||
| Issued debt | 288 | 1,510 | 1,798 | 439 | 1,847 | 2,286 |
| Bank overdrafts | 410 | – | 410 | 350 | – | 350 |
| Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings | 8,341 | 773 | 9,114 | 4,996 | 1,424 | 6,420 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 37 | 207 | 244 | 6 | 237 | 243 |
| Other payables | 152 | – | 152 | 77 | – | 77 |
| Accruals | 25 | – | 25 | 32 | – | 32 |
| Current tax | 18 | – | 18 | 28 | – | 28 |
| Deferred tax | 2 | 10 | 10 | – | 19 | 19 |
| Total | 9,271 | 2,500 | 11,771 | 5,928 | 3,527 | 9,455 |
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023 227
4 Creditors continued
Issued debt
| Nominal value | Redeemable | Interest | 2023 Carrying value £m | 2022 Carrying value £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurobond €500m Jan 2023 | 1.88% | – | 439 | ||
| US Private Placement $352m Oct 2023 | 4.12% | 288 | 310 | ||
| US Private Placement $100m Dec 2024 | 3.54% | 82 | 89 | ||
| Eurobond £250m Sep 2025 | 2.00% | 231 | 220 | ||
| US Private Placement $300m Sep 2025 | 3.81% | 235 | 259 | ||
| Eurobond £250m Jun 2026 | 3.85% | 249 | 249 | ||
| US Private Placement $300m Dec 2026 | 3.64% | 246 | 269 | ||
| Eurobond £300m Jul 2029 | 2.00% | 245 | 233 | ||
| Eurobond £250m Sep 2032 | 4.38% | 222 | 218 | ||
| Total | 1,798 | 2,286 |
The Company has a £2,000m Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) committed to August 2026. At 30 September 2023, no amounts were drawn under the RCF (2022: £nil). The Company has a $4bn commercial paper programme. Commercial paper is issued to meet short-term liquidity requirements and is supported by the RCF. At 30 September 2023, no commercial paper was outstanding under the programme (2022: £nil).
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings may be interest-free or interest-bearing loans. Interest-free loans are repayable on demand and classified as current. Interest-bearing loans incur interest at fixed rates (between 0.73% and 3.10%) or various floating rates with margins ranging from -0.15% to +1.50% (subject to a minimum all-in rate of 0%) and have maturities ranging from repayable on demand up to September 2048. The book value of amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings falling due within one year approximates to fair value due to the short-term nature of these payables. The fair value of amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings falling due after more than one year is shown below:
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings falling due after more than one year
| Nominal value | Redeemable | Interest | 2023 Carrying value £m | 2023 Fair value £m | 2022 Carrying value £m | 2022 Fair value £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euro intra -group loan 1 | €750m Jul 2024 | 0.73% | – | – | 632 | 631 | |
| Euro intra-group loan | €500m Sep 2028 | 1.60% | 375 | 387 | 380 | 388 | |
| Euro intra -group loan | €500m Mar 2030 | 3.10% | 398 | 409 | 412 | 415 | |
| Total | 773 | 796 | 1,424 | 1,434 |
Details of the derivative financial instruments are shown in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
227Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
228 Consolidated financial statements
5 Maturity of financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments
The maturity of financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments at 30 September is as follows:
2023 Maturity of financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments
| Less than 1 year £m | Between 1 and 2 years £m | Between 2 and 5 years £m | Over 5 years £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issued debt | 288 | 548 | 495 | 467 | 1,798 |
| Bank overdrafts | 410 | – | – | – | 410 |
| Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings | 8,341 | – | 375 | 398 | 9,114 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 19 | (5) | 73 | 94 | 181 |
| Other payables | 152 | – | – | – | 152 |
2022 Maturity of financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments
| Less than 1 year £m | Between 1 and 2 years £m | Between 2 and 5 years £m | Over 5 years £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issued debt | 439 | 310 | 1,086 | 451 | 2,286 |
| Bank overdrafts | 350 | – | – | – | 350 |
| Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings | 4,996 | 632 | – | 792 | 6,420 |
| Derivative financial instruments | (65) | (8) | (6) | 175 | 96 |
| Other payables | 77 | – | – | – | 77 |
6 Share capital
Details of the share capital and share-based payments of the Company are shown in notes 25 and 26 to the consolidated financial statements.
7 Post-balance sheet events
In the period from 1 October to 14 November 2023, 6,357,210 shares were repurchased for a total price, including transaction costs, of £131m under the share buyback announced in May 2023. In November 2023, we announced a further share buyback of up to $500m (£410m), to complete in 2024 subject to M&A activity. On 20 November 2023, a final dividend in respect of 2023 of 28.1p per share, £482m in aggregate, was proposed.
8 Other information
Company audit fee
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements totalled £1.9m (2022: £1.8m).
Employees
The Company had no direct employees in the course of the year (2022: none).
Guarantees and indemnities
At 30 September 2023, guarantees and indemnities (including subsidiary undertakings’ overdrafts) totalled £468m (2022: £443m). Details of certain contingent guarantees and indemnities which involve the Company are set out in note 30 to the consolidated financial statements.
Related party transactions
With the exception of transactions between the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, there are no material related party transactions in the current or prior year.
Parent Company financial statements228
Shareholder information
Registrar
The Company’s registrar is Link Group.
Contact information – Post: Central Square, 29 Wellington Street, LeedsLS14DL
– Email: [email protected]
– Telephone: within the UK: Freephone 0800 029 4520 and from overseas: +44 333 300 1568.
Lines are open between 9:00 am and 5.30 pm UK time, Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays in England and Wales. Shareholders should contact Link directly if theyhave questions about their Compass shareholding.
Manage your holding online
Shareholders can register online to view their shareholding detailsusing the Share Portal, a service offered by the registrar at www.signalshares.com. To register for the Share Portal, shareholders need their investor code which is shown on their share certificate or dividend confirmation. Theservice enables shareholders to:
* check their shareholdings in Compass Group PLC 24 hours a day;
* gain easy access to a range of shareholder information including indicative valuations and payment instruction details; and
* to appoint a proxy to attend general meetings of Compass Group PLC.
Electronic communications and published information
The Annual Report and Accounts and all other shareholder communications can be found on our website, www.compass-group.com. Shareholders are encouraged to receive notification of the availability of shareholder communications via email and to view documents electronically. By electing to receive shareholder communications inthis way, shareholders can read and/or download information at their convenience; and help the Company to save money by reducing the number of paper documents produced and posted. By signing up forelectronic communications, shareholders will be notified by email each time a new shareholder document is available. Register to receive email communications at www.signalshares.com. To receive a copy of the Annual Report or Notice of Annual General Meeting in another format e.g.# Shareholder Information
The Company normally pays a dividend twice each year. Dividends are paid in accordance with the instructions given to the registrar, i.e. by cheque, direct payment or reinvested in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Most shareholders resident outside the UK can have dividends of more than £10 paid into their bank account directly via the Link Group international payments service. Details and terms and conditions may be viewed at ww2.linkgroup.eu/ips. Shareholders outside the UK who are unable to use the international payments service should contact Link to discuss the payment options available.
The price of the Company’s shares is available on the Company’s website, www.compass-group.com. Compass Group shares can be traded through most banks, building societies, stockbrokers or online dealing services.
ShareGift, the charity share donation scheme, is a free service for shareholders wishing to give shares to charitable causes. It is particularly useful for anyone wishing to dispose of a small quantity of shares where the market value makes it uneconomic to sell on a commission basis. Further information can be obtained from ShareGift’s website, www.sharegift.org; telephone within the UK: 020 7930 3737 and from overseas: +44 20 7930 3737; email: [email protected].
Compass Group PLC operates an American Depositary Receipt (ADR) programme under which ADRs are traded on the over-the-counter market under the symbol CMPGY. One ADR represents one ordinary Compass share. BNY Mellon is the depositary bank and maintains the Company’s ADR register. Shareholders with a query about Compass ADRs should contact BNY Mellon as follows:
Further information can also be found on BNY Mellon’s website, mybnymdr.com, using the symbol CMPGY.
We offer the following advice to shareholders on protecting their personal information and Compass Group PLC shares:
Investment scams are often sophisticated and difficult to spot. Fraudsters are persuasive and use high-pressure tactics to lure investors into scams. They may offer to sell shares that turn out to be worthless or non-existent, or to buy shares at an inflated price in return for an up-front payment. Whilst high profits are promised, if shares are bought or sold in this way, it is likely the money for the purchase or from the sale will be lost. These operations are commonly known as ‘boiler room’ scams. Shareholders should be wary if they are contacted out of the blue, pressured to invest quickly or promised returns that sound too good to be true. The higher the return promised, the more likely it’s a high-risk investment or a scam.
229Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued some guidance for shareholders on how to recognise and avoid investment fraud:
Report a firm or scam by contacting the FCA’s Consumer Helpline on 0800 111 6768 or using the FCA’s reporting form which can be found on their website, www.fca.org.uk/scamsmart.
If a shareholder has already invested in a scam, fraudsters are likely to target them again or sell their details to other criminals. The follow-up scam may be separate or related to the previous fraud, such as an offer to get a shareholder’s money back or to buy back the investment after they have paid a fee. Any concerns about a potential scam should be reported to the FCA immediately.
The Investor section of the Company’s website, www.compass-group.com contains a wide range of useful information, including: the date, time and place of the Company’s 2024 AGM and documents related to the AGM; and share price, dividend history, share dealing information, taxation, annual reports, and regulatory announcements and statements.
Shareholder information continued
Shareholder Information
230
Certain information included in this Annual Report and Accounts is forward looking and involves risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements cover all matters which are not historical facts and include, without limitation, the direct and indirect future impacts and implications of: public health crises such as the coronavirus COVID-19 on the economy, nationally and internationally, and on the Group, its operations and prospects; risks associated with changes in environmental scenarios and related regulations including (without limitation) the evolution and development of the global transition to a low carbon economy (including increasing societal and investor expectations); disruptions and inefficiencies in supply chains (such as resulting from the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East); future domestic and global political, economic and business conditions (such as inflation or the UK’s exit from the EU); projections relating to results of operations and financial conditions and the Company’s plans and objectives for future operations, including, without limitation, discussions of expected future revenues, financing plans and expected expenditures and divestments; risks associated with changes in economic conditions, levels of economic growth and the strength of the food and support services markets in the jurisdictions in which the Group operates; fluctuations in food and other product costs and labour costs; prices and changes in exchange and interest rates; and the impacts of technological advancements.
Forward- looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including terms such as ‘believes’, ‘estimates’, ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘forecasts’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘projects’, ‘goal’, ‘target’, ‘aim’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report and Accounts are not guarantees of future performance. All forward-looking statements in this Annual Report and Accounts are based upon information known to the Company on the date of this Annual Report and Accounts. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that any particular expectation will be met and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements when making their investment decisions. Additionally, forward-looking statements regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as a representation or warranty that such trends or activities will continue in the future. Other than in accordance with its legal or regulatory obligations (including under the UK Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority), the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Nothing in this Annual Report and Accounts shall exclude any liability under applicable laws that cannot be excluded in accordance with such laws.
231Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
This report is printed on paper certified in accordance with the FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council®) and is recyclable and acid-free. Pureprint Ltd is FSC certified and ISO 14001 certified showing that it is committed to all round excellence and improving environmental performance is an important part of this strategy. Pureprint Ltd aims to reduce at source the effect its operations have on the environment and is committed to continual improvement, prevention of pollution and compliance with any legislation or industry standards.Pureprint Ltd is a CarbonNeutral® Printing Company. The images in the Annual Report and Accounts are representative of the services provided by Compass Group PLC and its subsidiaries and partners. Some of the photography used in the Report has been taken prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Designed and produced by Black Sun Global www.blacksun-global.com
Carbon Neutral © Publication Certificate
This certificate verifies that: The stated subject is carbon neutral through the use of high quality environmental instruments in accordance with The CarbonNeutral Protocol. All credits adhere to standards approved by the International Carbon Reduction and Offset Alliance(ICROA).
Certification: CarbonNeutral® publication
Duration: 01 Jan 2023 - 31 Dec 2023
Name of organisation: Compass Group PLC
Quantity of contractual instruments: 3 tCO 2 e
Subject: Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Project Information: Bondhu Chula Stoves, Bangladesh, GoldStandard VER (3 tCO 2 e)
Certificate number: CN20231111940
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2023
Compass Group PLC
Compass House
Guildford Street, Chertsey
Surrey KT16 9BQ
United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales No. 4083914
Domiciled in the United Kingdom
T +44 1932 573 000
Find this Report online at www.compass-group.com
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.