Annual Report • Jul 31, 2009
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
| P R RE SS EL EA SE |
3 |
|---|---|
| C R P ON SO ES TS SE ION LID AT ED UL RE NT AT |
1 0 |
| F T-H F A R IRS AL CT IVI TY EP OR T. |
3 2 |
| T i M k et re ar s . |
3 3 |
| ● R pl M ark t et e ac em en s ● O ri gi l E i M ark t et na qu pm en s . |
3 5 .3 8 |
| M i ch el i n S al es |
.4 0 |
| ● A l i f I ct S al na ys s o m pa on es |
4 0 |
| ● Q rt Q rt C h ua er on ua er an ge s |
4 1 |
| ● C h i n S al b y B i S t an ge es us ne ss e gm en |
4 1 |
| ● C y R at d t h e C y E f f t urr en c es an urr en c ec |
4 4 |
| ● N et S al b y R gi es e on |
.4 4 |
| C nt n t h e C l i d at ed I e S t at t |
4 5 |
| om me s o on so nc om em en ● I e S t at t b ct i |
4 6 |
| y F nc om em en un on ● O rat i e b i S t |
4 8 |
| g I y B pe n nc om us ne ss e gm en ● O t h I e S t at t I t er nc om em en em s |
5 0 |
| O f r 2 0 0 9 ut l k t h e Y |
3 5 |
| oo or ea |
|
| C nt n t h e C l i d at ed B al S h t om me s o on so an ce ee |
.5 4 |
| ● I gi b l e A nd P P l d E i nt et rt t t an ss s a ro pe y, an an qu pm en |
5 5 |
| ● O i g W ork i g C pi al R i rat t t pe n n a e qu rem en |
5 5 |
| ● E i t qu y . |
6 5 |
| ● D eb t |
6 5 |
| ● E pl e B ef i t m o ye en s . |
8 5 |
| C nt n t h e C l i d at ed C h F l S t at t om me s o on so as ow em en |
.5 9 |
● N et C h F l s f O rat i g A ct i vi t i as ow rom pe n es |
.5 9 |
● C pi t al E nd i t a x ure |
5 9 |
| pe ● F C h F l ree as ow |
6 0 |
| R el ed i 6 1 at rt pa es |
|
|---|---|
| R i sk M 6 1 nt an a ge me |
|
| C l i d at ed K y F i d R at i .6 2 on so e gu res an os |
|
| S t k M k et D at .6 4 oc ar a . ● T h e M i ch el i n S h 6 4 are ● S t k M ark et D at 6 6 oc a |
|
| F i -H al f 2 0 0 9 H i gh l i gh 6 8 rst t s ● S & .6 8 t rat P art rsh i M A e g y - ne p - S ● P rod t i I at i 6 9 uc s - erv ce s - nn ov on erf ● M i ch el i n P d R i b i l i t 7 2 orm an ce an es po ns y ● F i .7 3 na nc e. |
|
| C I F S ON SO LID AT ED NT ER IM INA NC IAL TA TE ME NT S F OR TH E S IX MO NT HS EN DE D 3 0 J E 2 0 0 9 7 6 UN |
|
| ● C l i d at ed I e S t at t .7 7 on so nc om em en ● C l i d at ed S t at t of C eh si I 7 8 on so em en om pr en ve nc om e ● C l i d at ed B al S h t 7 9 on so an ce ee ● C l i d at ed S t at t of C h s i n E i t 8 0 on so em en an ge qu y . ● C l i d at ed C h F l S t at t 8 1 on so as ow em en ● N h e C l i d ed I i F i i al S 8 2 ot t o t at nt t at t es on so er m na nc em en s |
|
| S A ' R R I F I TA TU TO RY UD ITO RS EV IEW EP OR T O N NT ER IM INA NC IAL NF OR MA TIO N 2 0 0 9 .9 1 FO R |
|
| S P N A OF SO CC OU FO TA TE ME NT TH E ER NT AB LE R I F R 9 4 TH E NT ER IM INA NC IAL EP OR T |
|
| C F A ON TA CT S A ND INA NC IAL GE ND A |
Clermont-Ferrand - 31 July 2009
€7.1 billion
Operating margin of 4.0% before non-recurring items and major business metrics maintained
thanks to efficient management of operations
Net loss of €122 million, after high restructuring costs
● Unit sales down 23%, primarily due to the fall-off in tire demand in all of the country markets except China. The decline was especially apparent in the original equipment business and, more broadly, in Truck tires.
● Highly positive 9.6% impact from the price mix, reflecting the resistance of the MICHELIN brand and the Group's firm pricing policy.
● Operating income before non-recurring items down 60.2% to €282 million, hit by the decline in unit sales and the increase in capacity under-utilization costs.
● Generation of €575 million in free cash flow, driven by efficient management of working capital (particularly inventory) and the sharp reduction in capital expenditure, to €319 million from €500 million in first-half 2008.
"Faced with the persistent, steep decline in global tire markets, Michelin has responded swiftly and effectively by tightening its management and deploying production adjustment programs," said Michel Rollier, Managing General Partner. "As part of this response, the Group nevertheless had to introduce short-time working hours in a number of countries and to implement the production reorganization programs needed to make Michelin more competitive. Concerning the business environment, inventories have now returned to more normal levels, but not to the extent that we can talk about a real upturn. We will therefore maintain our efforts in the months ahead, although the decline in raw materials prices should support second-half margins. The Group is committed to generating positive free cash flow in the second half, in order to continue preserving its major business metrics. The dedicated involvement of our teams and the measures taken to enhance our responsiveness will enable Michelin to emerge from the current period stronger and more efficient than ever." Financial statements COMPAGNIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN Financial Information for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 First-half net sales down 13.4% to
| ( IN € ) MI LLI ON S |
J e 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 un |
J e 3 0 , 2 0 0 8 un |
C h an ge |
|---|---|---|---|
| N ET SA LES |
7 ,1 3 4 |
8 ,2 3 9 |
- 1 3 .4 % |
| O PE RA TIN G I NC OM E B EF OR E N ON -RE CU RR ING IN CO ME AN D E XP EN SE S |
2 8 2 |
7 0 8 |
- 6 0 .2 % |
| O PE RA TIN G M AR GIN BE FO RE NO N-R EC UR RIN G I NC OM E A ND EX PE NS ES |
% 4 .0 |
% 8 .6 |
- 4 .6 pt s |
| C P D L T T T R D D AS SE NG ER AR AN IGH RU CK IRE S A ND ELA TE IST RIB UT ION |
6 .3 % |
.6 % 7 |
- 1 .3 pt s |
| T T R D D CK S A IST ION RU IRE ND ELA TE RIB UT |
.9 % - 7 |
.2 % 5 |
- 1 3 .1 pt s |
| S B CIA US SS ES PE LTY INE |
1 .8 % 7 |
2 0 .0 % |
- 2 .2 pt s |
| O E/ ( ) G I NC OM LO SS PE RA TIN |
( 1 0 ) |
0 8 7 |
/ N M |
| E/ ( ) N INC OM LO SS ET |
( 1 2 2 ) |
4 3 0 |
/ N M |
| N ET DE BT |
3 ,8 1 8 |
4 ,3 3 4 |
%1 - 1 0 .7 |
| G EA RIN G |
7 5 % |
8 0 % |
nt1 A 9- i pt m pro ve me |
| W2 F RE E C AS H F LO |
5 7 5 |
( 4 4 5 ) |
€ 1 ,0 2 0 m |
| L3 E MP LO YE ES ON PA YR OL |
1 1 2 ,5 0 0 |
1 2 1 ,0 0 0 |
.0 % - 7 |
1 Compared with December 31, 2008
2Cash flow from operating activities less cash flow from investing activities
3At period-end
| F T H F 2 0 0 9 IRS AL % ch Y oY an ge |
E UR OP E i l . C I S nc |
N A OR TH ME RIC A |
A SIA |
S A OU TH ME RIC A |
A / FR ICA M E IDD LE AS T |
T OT AL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P C D L T T T AS SE NG ER AR AN IGH RU CK IRE S |
||||||
| O ri gi l E i t na qu pm en |
% - 3 3 .1 |
% - 5 1 .0 |
% - 1 7 .3 |
% - 2 0 .7 |
% - 2 5 .0 |
% - 2 9 .1 |
| R pl t e ac em en |
-1 2 .1 % |
- 1 0 .7 % |
- 4 .6 % |
- 7 .4 % |
- 5 .2 % |
- 9 .4 % |
| T T S* RU CK IRE |
||||||
| O ri gi l E i t na qu pm en |
% - 6 7 .4 |
% - 4 7 .8 |
% - 2 1 .9 |
% - 3 0 .7 |
% - 2 5 .1 |
% - 4 4 .5 |
| R pl t e ac em en |
- 3 1 .4 % |
- 1 8 .2 % |
- 1 2 .0 % |
- 2 2 .3 % |
- 7 .1 % |
- 1 7 .2 % |
*Radial market only
**Down 6.5% excluding the CIS
● Except in China, original equipment markets around the world fell sharply in the first half, as carmakers drastically drew down inventories over the period and slashed production in response to plunging demand.
● Markets showed signs of stabilizing in the second quarter, however, particularly in the countries that had introduced automobile stimulus packages.
● Markets in Europe and North America bottomed out in the first quarter, which saw a decline in vehicle miles traveled, a reduction in average highway speeds and sustained retailer destocking. Demand in Europe fell 12.1% over the first half, dragged down by the steep drop in the Russian market. Excluding the CIS, demand was down 6.5% for the period.
● Retail inventory is at a record low, indicating that most of the drawdown is behind us.
● In Asia, the Chinese market continued to expand, rising 13.8% over the period.
● The collapse in demand that began in the autumn in Europe and North America spread to all of the Group's markets in the first-half and shows no sign of abating.
● In the mature markets, weakness has hit every segment, from power units to trailers, with semi-truck manufacturers and broadline trailer-makers feeling an even steeper decline.
● In general, demand has fallen fastest in markets driven by exports and international transportation.
● In Western Europe and North America, intense retailer destocking in the first quarter exacerbated the impact of the fall-off in road traffic, driving the market down even faster. As drawdowns tapered off in the second quarter, however, demand moved back in line with freight trends.
EARTHMOVER TIRES: The Mining and Quarries segment is withstanding the economic slowdown, as mining companies rebuild their high-performance tire inventory. On the other hand, global original equipment demand is still falling and the Infrastructure markets have slowed considerably in Europe and North America.
AGRICULTURAL TIRES: At a time of low economic visibility, original equipment demand fell sharply in the first half. The replacement market was down considerably in Europe but fared better in North America, particularly for tires for high-powered farm machinery.
TWO-WHEEL TIRES: The "motorized" segments contracted sharply in the mature country markets during the period, but continued to expand in the major emerging markets, albeit at a slower pace.
AIRCRAFT TIRES: Airlines saw a decline in business in the first half, with a sharp reduction in the number of flights, but demand for radial tires is still less affected.
Net sales stood at €7,134 million for the period, down 13.4% at current exchange rates compared with first-half 2008.
The decline reflected the 23.3% negative impact from the fall-off in volumes as demand plummeted, which was attenuated by the positive 9.6% price-mix effect. Pricing policies were held firm over the period, while the product mix continued to move up-market, thanks to the MICHELIN brand's solid resilience and a favorable replacement/OE market mix.
The currency effect was a positive 2.9%, as gains in the US dollar and, to a lesser extent, the Chinese yuan against the euro offset the declines in the British pound and the Brazilian real.
Operating margin before non-recurring items stood at 4.0%, 4.6 points lower than in first-half 2008.
At €282 million, operating income before non-recurring items was down 60.2% for the period, reflecting the extremely adverse impact of the decline in unit sales (€875 million) and the under-utilization of Group production capacity. The raw materials price impact, which was highly unfavorable in 2008, has started to decline, but still reduced first-half 2009 operating income by a total of €117 million.
On the upside, the positive price-mix effect added €608 million to operating income for the period.
The net loss for the period totaled €122 million, after €292 million in restructuring costs related to the plant specialization plan in France and implementation of the manufacturing and sales reorganization plan in North America.
The Group generated €575 million in free cash flow in the first half of 2009, compared with a negative €445 million a year earlier.
The improvement was led by the €580 million reduction in inventory over the period, thanks to the responsive deployment of the production flexibility programs in the second quarter and, to a lesser extent, the decline in raw materials prices.
Free cash flow was also generated by the intrinsic gains driven by the transformation program and the reduction in days of sales outstanding. In addition, as announced, capital expenditure was sharply scaled back, to €319 million from €500 million in first-half 2008, without compromising the Group's sustained expansion in new growth markets.
As a result, gearing stood at 75% at June 30, 2009, a 9-point improvement over December 31, 2008, and consolidated net debt amounted to €3,818 million, down €455 million over the period.
The dividend reinvestment plan, offered for the first time this year, attracted more than half of all shareholders, enabling the Group to save €80 million in cash.
| ( IN € ) ON S MI LLI |
N ET |
SA LES |
O G I PE RA TIN NO EC N-R UR |
NC OM OR E B EF E G I MS RIN TE |
O G M PE RA TIN NO EC N-R UR |
GIN FO AR BE RE G I MS RIN TE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F T-H F 2 0 0 9 IRS AL |
F T-H F 2 0 0 8 IRS AL |
F T-H F 2 0 0 9 IRS AL |
F T-H F 2 0 0 8 IRS AL |
F T-H F 2 0 0 9 IRS AL |
F T-H F 2 0 0 8 IRS AL |
|
| P C D L T T T AS SE NG ER AR AN IGH RU CK IRE S D R D D AN ELA TE IST RIB UT ION |
3 ,9 4 9 |
4 ,3 5 7 |
2 4 7 |
3 3 2 |
6 .3 % |
.6 % 7 |
| T T R D D RU CK IRE S A ND ELA TE IST RIB UT ION |
2 ,0 7 1 |
2 ,6 9 6 |
( 1 6 3 ) |
1 3 9 |
- 7 .9 % |
5 .2 % |
| S B PE CIA LTY US INE SS ES |
1 ,1 1 4 |
1 ,1 8 6 |
1 9 8 |
2 3 7 |
1 7 .8 % |
2 0 .0 % |
| C ON SO TO LID AT ED TA L |
,1 3 4 7 |
8 ,2 3 9 |
2 8 2 |
0 8 7 |
4 .0 % |
8 .6 % |
Net sales declined by 9.4% in the first half, to €3,949 million, while operating income stood at €247 million, versus €332 million in first-half 2008.
The impact of falling markets was considerably attenuated by the highly positive price-mix effect and the firm resistance of the MICHELIN brand's market share, particularly in the Replacement business. Cost discipline was tightened while production programs were scaled back over the period.
Net sales declined 23.2% year-on-year to €2,071 million in the first half, primarily due to the collapse in demand in most truck tire markets around the world, which was particularly apparent in the original equipment segment.
The business ended the period with an operating loss of €163 million, reflecting the decline in unit sales, the resulting sharp reduction in output and the cost of idled capacity.
Net sales from the Specialty Businesses amounted to €1,114 million for the first six months of the year, a 6.1% decline from first-half 2008. Sales in the Earthmover segment demonstrated firm resistance, supported by increased demand for high-performance tires in the mining industry.
Operating margin remained high.
A full description of first-half 2009 highlights may be found on the Michelin website: www.michelin.com/corporate
First-half 2009 results will be reviewed in a conference call in English today, Friday July 31, at 10:30 am CEST (9:30 am UT). If you wish to participate, please dial one of the following numbers from 10:20 am CET:
Please refer to the www.michelin.com/corporate website for practical information concerning the conference call.
2009 net sales and results: Friday, February 12, 2010 before start of trading
The interim financial report for the period ending June 30, 2009 may be downloaded from the www.michelin.com/corporate website, in the Finance/Regulated Information section. It has also been filed with Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF). The report contains: ● The business review for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
● The consolidated financial statements and notes for the period.
● The statutory auditors' review report on the interim financial information for 2009.
Contacts Investor Relations Valérie Magloire +33 (0) 1 45 66 16 15 +33 (0) 6 76 21 88 12 (mobile) [email protected]
Jacques-Philippe Hollaender : +33 (0) 1 45 66 11 07 +33 (0) 6 87 74 29 27 (mobile) [email protected]
Fabienne de Brébisson : + 33 (0) 1 45 66 10 72 +33 (0) 6 08 86 18 15 (mobile) [email protected]
Jacques Engasser : + 33 (0) 4 73 98 59 08 [email protected]
Financial statements Disclaimer This press release is not an offer to purchase or a solicitation to recommend the purchase of Michelin shares. To obtain more detailed information on Michelin, please consult the documents filed in France with Autorité des Marchés Financiers, which are also available from the www.michelin.com website. This press release could contain a number of provisional statements. Although the Company believes that these statements are based on reasonable assumptions as at the time of publishing this document, they are by nature subject to risks and contingencies liable to translate into a difference between actual data and the forecasts made or induced by these statements.
| Net sales | $\in$ 7,134m | % Change YoY $-13.4%$ |
|---|---|---|
| Operating income before non-recurring items |
€282 m | $-60.2%$ |
| Operating margin before non-recurring items |
4.0% | $-4.6$ pts |
| Net Loss | $\varepsilon$ (122)m | $N/M^*$ |
| Net debt-to-equity ratio | 75% | 9 pts improvement (vs. Dec. 31, 2008) |
| Free cash flow** | €+575m | €+1,020m |
| P r C as se n ge |
ar/ Li gh t T |
k ruc |
Ma rke ts at Ju % ch Yo Y an ge |
30 , 20 09 ne |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eur ope with CIS |
No rth Am eric a |
As ia |
Sou th Am eric a |
Afr ica Mid dle Ea st |
Tot al |
|
| Ori gin al Equ ipm ent |
-3 3 .1 |
1 .0 -5 |
-1 .3 7 |
-2 0 .7 |
-2 .0 5 |
-2 9 .1 |
| Rep lac ent em |
-1 2 .1* |
-1 0 .7 |
-4 .6 |
-7 .4 |
.2 -5 |
-9 .4 |
| *Eu clud ing rop e ex ( Tr k rad i uc |
CIS : -6. 5% ) al rk et ma |
|||||
| Eur ope with CIS |
No rth Am eric a |
As ia |
Sou th Am eric a |
Afr ica Mid dle Ea st |
Tot al |
|
| Ori gin al Equ ipm ent |
-6 .4 7 |
-4 .8 7 |
-2 1 .9 |
-3 0 .7 |
-2 .1 5 |
-4 4 .5 |
| -3 1 .4 |
-1 8 .2 |
-1 2 .0 |
-2 2 .3 |
-7 .1 |
-1 7 .2 |
| 1 ,1 1 4 N et S al es 2 ,0 71 et S al es -2 3 .2 % O tin In pe ra g co me 1 9 8 tin In pe ra g co me ( 1 6 3 ) N/M (be fore urri item s) non -rec ng fore urri item s) non -rec ng |
(in € m |
Y oY (% cha ) nge |
H1 2 0 0 9 (in € m illio ns) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O tin pe ra g ar n M gi 1 7. 8 % ar n -7 .9 -1 3 .1 in t % po (be fore urri item s) non -rec ng urri item s) ng |
M gi |
||||
| s – J uly 3 1, 20 09 24 - Firs t-Ha lf 20 09 R esult s – J uly 3 1, 20 09 |
| Sustained High Margins | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Specialty Businesses | |||
| H1 2009 (in $\epsilon$ millions) |
YoY (% change) |
||
| Net Sales | 1,114 | $-6.1%$ | |
| Operating Income (before non-recurring items) |
198 | $-16.5%$ | |
| Operating Margin (before non-recurring items) |
17.8% | $-2.2$ points | |
| 24 - First-Half 2009 Results - July 31, 2009 | Letter way forware |
Michelin Group 2009 Interim Financial Report 21
| illi on s |
H1 20 09 |
H1 20 08 |
Yo Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| t S Ne ale s |
7 ,1 3 4 |
8 ,2 3 9 |
-1 3 .4 % |
| O rat in g I pe nco me |
2 8 2 |
0 8 7 |
-6 0 .2 % |
| (be for ing ite ) e n on- rec urr ms % o f ne t sa les |
4.0 % |
8.6 % |
-4. 6 poi nts |
| No n-R in g E ec urr xp en ses |
(2 9 2 ) |
- | - |
| O rat in g I pe nco me |
(1 0 ) |
0 8 7 |
- |
| Co of st Ne t D eb t Oth Fin cia l In er an co me d E an xp en ses |
(1 3 8 ) |
(1 0 6 ) |
- |
| Inc e T om ax |
+2 3 |
(1 8 1 ) |
- |
| Sh of Pr ofi t fr As cia tes are om so |
+3 | +9 | - |
| Ne t L os s |
(1 2 2 ) |
4 3 0 |
- |
| in $\epsilon$ millions | H 1 2009 | H 1 2008 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA* (before non-recurring items) |
751 | 1,172 | $-421$ |
| Change in inventory | +580 | -453 | $+1,033$ |
| Change in trade receivables | $-17$ | $-110$ | $+93$ |
| Change in payables | -490 | -131 | $-359$ |
| Tax and finance costs paid | $-100$ | $-259$ | $+159$ |
| Change in provisions | -24 | $-131$ | +107 |
| Other WCR | $+263$ | +86 | +177 |
| OPERATING CASH FLOW | 963 | 174 | $+789$ |
| Gross capex | $-319$ | $-500$ | $+181$ |
| Other | -69 | $-119$ | +50 |
| FREE CASH FLOW** | $+575$ | $-445$ | $+1,020$ |
«This presentation is not an offer to purchase or a solicitation This presentation is not an offer to purchase or a solicitation to recommend the purchase of Michelin shares. To obtain more detail recommend the purchase of Michelin shares. To obtain more detailed information on Michelin, information on please consult the documentation published in please the published in France by France by Autorit Autorité des Marchés Financiers available from the Financiers available from www.michelin.com website. website.
This presentation could contain a number of provisional statements. Although the Company believes that these statements are based on reasonable assumptions at the time of the publication of this document, cument, they are by nature subject to risks and contingencies liable to they are by nature subject to and contingencies liable to translate into into a difference between actual data and the forecasts made or induced by these statements. statements.»
| 44 - | Firs t-Ha lf 20 09 R esult s – J uly 3 1, 20 09 |
|---|---|
Michelin Group 2009 Interim Financial Report 31
| T M TS IRE AR KE |
3 3 |
|---|---|
| R pl M k t et e ac em en ar s . |
3 5 |
| ● P r C d L i gh T k t as se n ge ar an ruc |
.3 5 |
| ● T k ruc |
3 6 |
| O ri gi l E i M k t et na qu pm en ar s |
.3 8 |
| ● P r C d L i gh T k t as se n ge ar an ruc |
.3 8 |
| ● T k ruc |
3 8 |
| M S ICH EL IN AL ES |
4 0 |
|---|---|
| A l i f I ct n S al na ys s o m pa o es |
.4 0 |
| Q rt Q rt C h ua er on ua er an ge s |
4 1 |
| C h i n S al b y B i S t an ge es us ne ss e gm en |
4 1 |
| ● P r C d L i gh t T k T i d R el at ed D i st ri b ut i as se n ge ar an ruc res an on |
4 2 |
| ● T k T i d R el at ed D i st ri b ut i ruc res an on |
.4 2 |
| ● S ci al t y B i pe us ne ss es |
.4 3 |
| C y R at d t h e C y E f f t ur re nc es an ur re nc ec |
.4 4 |
| N et S al b y R gi es e on |
4 4 |
| C C I S OM ME NT S O N T HE ON SO LID AT ED NC OM E TA TE ME NT |
4 5 |
|---|---|
| e S I t at t b y F ct i nc om em en un on |
.4 6 |
| ● G s I ros nc om e . |
4 6 |
| G o O ef ● F s I e t rat i g I e B N -R i g I t rom ros nc om pe n nc om ore on ec urr n em s . |
.4 6 |
| C o C n O ef ● F t t ri b ut i g t h s i rat i g I e B ac ors on n an ge pe n nc om ore |
|
| N -R i g I t on ec urr n em s. |
4 7 |
| O rat i I e b y B i S t pe n g nc om us ne ss e gm en |
4 8 |
| ● P r C d L i gh t T k T i d R el at ed D i st ri b ut i as se n ge ar an ruc res an on |
4 9 |
| ● T k T i d R el at ed D i st ri b ut i ruc res an on |
.4 9 |
| ● S ci al t y B i pe us ne ss es |
.4 9 |
| O t h I e S t at t I t er nc om em en em s |
5 0 |
| ● R M at eri al aw s |
5 0 |
| ● E pl e B ef i t C t nd N b of E pl m o ye en os s a um er m o ye es |
.5 1 |
| ● D ci at i d A rt i t i e pre on an mo za on |
5 1 |
| ● T rt at i C t ran s po on os s |
5 2 |
| ● N -R i g E on ec urr n x pe ns es |
5 2 |
| ● C of N D eb t et t os |
5 2 |
| ● O h F i i al I nd E t er na nc nc om e a x pe ns es |
.5 2 |
| ● I e T nc om ax |
3 .5 |
| ● C l i d ed N I nd E i P S h at et on so nc om e a arn n gs er are |
3 5 |
| O Y 2 0 0 9 UT LO OK FO R T HE EA R |
5 3 |
|---|---|
| C C B S OM ME NT S O N T HE ON SO LID AT ED AL AN CE HE ET nt gi b l e A et nd P rt , P l t d E i t an ss s a ro pe an an qu pm en y |
5 4 5 5 |
| ● G d wi l l oo |
.5 5 |
| O rat i g W k i g C pi t al R i nt pe n or n a e qu re me |
.5 5 |
| ● I t ori nv en es |
.5 6 |
| ● T rad e R ei b l ec va es E i t |
.5 6 .5 6 |
| qu y . D eb t |
.5 6 |
● G ri ea n g. |
.5 7 |
| ● R i at n gs |
5 7 |
| E pl e B ef i t m o ye en s |
5 8 |
| C C C F S OM ME NT S O N T HE ON SO LID AT ED AS H LO W TA TE ME NT |
5 9 |
| C s f O N et h F l rat i g A ct i vi t i as ow ro m pe n es |
9 5 |
| C pi t al E nd i t a x pe ur e |
5 9 |
| C F h F l ree as ow |
6 0 |
| R EL AT ED PA RT IES |
6 1 |
| R M ISK AN AG EM EN T |
6 1 |
| C K F R ON SO IGU S A IOS LID AT ED EY RE ND AT |
6 2 |
| S M D TO CK AR KE T AT A. |
6 4 |
| n S T h e M i ch el i h ar e . |
6 4 |
| n S erf ● M i ch el i h P are orm an ce |
.6 5 |
| S t k M k et D at oc ar a . |
.6 6 |
| r S ● D at h a pe are |
6 6 |
| ● G p C S pi t al d h h ol d i rou a an are n g |
6 7 |
| F T-H F 2 0 0 9 H IRS IGH LIG S AL HT |
6 8 |
| S P h i M & A t rat art e g y - ne rs p - |
6 8 |
| P d S i I i t at ro uc s - erv ce s - nn ov on M i ch el i n P erf nd R i b i l i t |
6 9 2 .7 |
| or ma nc e a es po ns y . F i na nc e |
3 7 |
Presentation
The world tire market is worth USD 127 billion1: 60% for passenger cars and light trucks and close to 30% for trucks and buses2.
The market amounted to 1.1 billion passenger car and light truck tires and 150 million truck and bus tires3. Three quarters of all tires are sold in the Replacement market that has historically been less cyclical than the Original Equipment market. And the replacement market accounts for 75% of Michelin's sales.
The world's three largest tire makers together account for 49% of the market1. Michelin recovered its world No 1 rank ahead of Bridgestone, but Asian manufacturers continue to gain ground. They are growing strongly in their regional markets, are gaining a strong foothold in North America and beginning to penetrate Europe.
In the United States, the number of cars is close to 800 per 1,000 inhabitants. China has fewer than 20, the rest of Asia excluding Japan fewer than 30 and Mexico, for example, has reached more than 200: the growth potential therefore remains huge. Despite the current crisis, the world's car fleet should grow by around 500 million vehicles by 2030, mainly in China, India, Brazil and Russia, to reach 1.3 billion light vehicles2.
For the first time ever, in 2008, fuel efficiency has become equally important as reliability and safety in the eyes of consumers4.
This results both from towering fuel price increases and from greater awareness of environmental issues.
All tire makers are initiating profound changes dictated by the need to save energy and raw materials, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and better meet growing expectations in terms of road safety and health.
To rise to these challenges and win market share, innovative capability is a major strategic asset.
4 Capgemini Cars Online 2008/2009 - 10th edition. Survey among more than 3,000 consumers in Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Russia, the UK and the USA.
Please refer to the detailed presentation of Group markets and positions in Michelin's Factbook 2009, downloadable fromwww.michelin.com/corporate.
Source: 2007 sales (US dollars) by manufacturer, Tire Business, September 5, 2008
As the economic slowdown gradually spread to emerging markets in the first half of 2009, global tire demand plummeted in all of the Group's country markets except China.
● Except in China, Passenger car and Light truck original equipment markets fell sharply as carmakers slashed production and drastically drew down inventories over the period. The severe contraction in the traditionally less cyclical replacement market reflected the decline in vehicle miles traveled, the reduction in average highway speeds and retailer destocking programs.
● In the Truck tire markets, the collapse in demand that began in the autumn in Europe and North America spread to all of the Group's markets in the first half and shows no sign of abating.
(in millions of units)
Source: Michelin estimates Source: Michelin estimates Radial tires
The Passenger car and Light truck tire markets were down sharply on first-half 2008 levels. In mature markets, demand is being dampened by the decline in vehicle miles traveled, the reduction in average highway speeds and retailer destocking programs. In developing countries, markets were gradually affected by the economic slowdown, and tire demand is now falling in every country except China.
Truck tire markets around the world were hurt by the decline in freight tonnage caused by the global economic slowdown and ensuing contraction in international trade. Other negative factors included inventory drawdowns as retailers sought to optimize working capital and a drop in fleet orders as carriers used existing stocks or recycled tires from idled trucks.
| P d as se n ge r c ar an L i gh t t k ark et ruc m s R pl t e ac em en |
1 H al f st- 2 0 0 9 |
1 Q st- rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
2 nd -Q rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| E uro pe |
-1 2 .1 % |
-1 0 .6 % |
-1 3 % .7 |
| 1 N h A ri ort me ca |
-1 0 .7 % |
-1 1 .8 % |
-9 .7 % |
| A si a |
-4 .6 % |
-9 .2 % |
+0 .1 % |
| S t h A ri ou me ca |
-7 .4 % |
-1 0 .6 % |
-4 .0 % |
| A f ri M i d d l e-E t ca as |
-5 .2 % |
-7 .3 % |
-3 .1 % |
| T ot al |
-9 .4 % |
1 United States, Canada and Mexico
Demand dropped a steep 12.1% in Europe, with the decline more pronounced in the East than in the West. Western European markets were down 5% to 7%, including declines of 6.4% in France, 2.9% in Germany, 7.1% in Spain and 8.0% in the United Kingdom. The contraction was more significant in Poland (down 7.7%) and the Nordic countries (down 13.6%), while markets in Eastern Europe saw demand suddenly collapse in Russia and the Baltic countries (down 63.7%). Excluding the CIS, demand was down 6.5% for the period.
Despite the unfavorable market environment, the market mix continued to track the structural move up the value chain of vehicle fleets across Europe. For example, the high-performance segment, which covers tires with W, Y and Z speed ratings, saw a
1.4% increase in sales over the period. Demand continued to trend towards either the top or the bottom of the market, with buying decisions driven either by quality or by price. Faced with the crisis and weak demand, European retailers sharply adjusted their inventories, which hit record lows at June 30.
The North American market, which shrank by 10.7% over the half, bottomed out in the first quarter and has remained very weak despite a slight uptick in the number of miles traveled by US motorists. Tire demand fell by 11.6% in the United States, as consumers bore the brunt of rising unemployment and falling average hourly wages, and by 15.6% in Mexico aggravated by the H1N1 influenza crisis. The Canadian market rose by 6.8%, lifted by sustained, albeit slowing, demand for winter tires. The decline in the North American market has primarily affected the high-performance and SUV segments.
Markets across South America plunged into the crisis that had spared them until end-2008. Tire demand dropped 7.4% overall, dragged down by the lifting of the IPI tax break (tax on manufactured products levied on new cars) which had a severe impact on sales in Brazil, and by the contraction in the Argentine market. Argentina, Ecuador and Venezuela have introduced new import procedures that set quotas on foreign-made tires.
Markets in Asia retreated 4.6% over the first half, but showed signs of bottoming out in the second quarter after falling sharply in the first three months of the year. Demand varied by country, rising 13.8% in China and declining in Japan (by 12.2%), South Korea, Taiwan, Australia and India (by 11.6%). Growth in China also varied between the North, which is the prime locus for government infrastructure plans, and the Southeast, which is feeling the effect of slowing exports.
| T k ark s* et ruc m R pl t e ac em en |
1 H al f st- 2 0 0 9 |
1 Q st- rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
2 nd -Q rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| E uro pe |
-3 1 .4 % |
-3 4 % .7 |
-2 8 .3 % |
| 1 N h A ri ort me ca |
-1 8 .2 % |
-2 5 .3 % |
-1 1 .5 % |
| A si a |
-1 2 .0 % |
-1 2 .6 % |
-1 1 .5 % |
| S t h A ri ou me ca |
-2 2 .3 % |
-2 3 .4 % |
-2 1 .4 % |
| f A ri M i d d l e-E t ca as |
% -7 .1 |
% -7 .7 |
% -6 .5 |
| T ot al |
-1 7 .2 % |
*Radial only
1 United States, Canada and Mexico
In Europe, the market declined by 31.4% in the first six months of the year. The Western European market, down 28.6%, is increasingly tracking demand for transportation in general, which fell by around 20% during the period. In Central Europe and Russia, where markets have been persistently depressed since second-half 2007, the first half of 2009 saw record declines of 32% and 48% respectively. International trucking companies, which account for around 50% of the market, have been hardest hit. Large fleets, which have a more flexible cost structure, have withstood the drop-off in demand better than smaller companies, which are facing a cash crunch. The decline in transportation demand is being amplified by retail inventory drawdowns and the recycling of tires from idled trucks.
In millions of radial tires Europe excluding Russia - 12-month rolling
In North America, rising unemployment and falling household incomes have spurred consumers to save more and spend less, directly impacting freight tonnage, which declined by 13.6% between June 2008 and June 2009. The tire market is gradually moving back in line with freight demand, after falling faster than truck traffic in the first quarter due to inventory drawdowns by retailers. The replacement market contracted by 18.2% in the first half, reflecting declines of 25% in the first quarter and 12% in the second.
The retread market eased back slightly over the period.
Change in North American Truck replacement market In millions of radial tires 12-month rolling
In South America, the steep drop in the prices of raw materials and farm commodities continued to weigh on transportation demand. In Brazil, the replacement market fell by 22.3% in the first half, dragged down by a 15% decline in freight tonnage. Certain countries, like Chile, Bolivia and Argentina, have introduced new import procedures. Retailer inventories were low at period-end, so the replacement tire market should gradually move back in line with tonnage trends.
In millions of radial tires
Change in Brazilian Truck replacement market
In Asia, the radial market was down 12% in the first half. In China, which accounts for 62% of all tires sold in Asia, the decline in the radial market is slowing, ending the period at just 7.8%. With cross-ply sales falling faster, radials increased their share of the market to 67% from 65% in first-half 2008. Chinese tire manufacturers are reducing cross-ply capacity in favor of radial capacity.
After faring better than other parts of the world, markets in the Africa Middle East region joined the downward trend in first-half 2009. In all, demand for replacement tires retreated 7.1% over the period, with steeper declines in Turkey, Iran and Dubai. Demand remained firmer in Saudi Arabia and Algeria, whose economies are less open to international trade and therefore less affected by the crisis.
Except in China, original equipment markets around the world fell sharply in the first half as carmakers slashed production and drastically drew down inventories over the period.
| P d as se n ge r c ar an L i gh k ark t t et ruc m s O ri gi l E i t na qu pm en |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- Q rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
2 nd -Q rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| E uro pe |
-3 3 .1 % |
-3 8 .6 % |
-2 7 .8 % |
| 1 N ort h A ri me ca |
-5 1 .0 % |
-5 2 .0 % |
-4 9 .9 % |
| A si a |
% -1 7 .3 |
% -2 6 .4 |
% -7 .7 |
| S h A ri t ou me ca |
-2 0 % .7 |
-2 6 .2 % |
-1 % 5 .7 |
| A f ri M i d d l e-E t ca as |
-2 5 .0 % |
-2 5 .0 % |
-2 5 .0 % |
| T al ot |
-2 9 .1 % |
1 United States, Canada and Mexico
The steepest declines were in Europe, down 33.1%, and North America, down 51.0%. Markets showed signs of stabilizing in the second quarter, however, particularly in the European countries that had introduced automobile stimulus packages, with a more favorable impact on small-car tires.
In Asia, growth varied by country, with steep declines in South Korea (down 27%), which is planning to introduce a scrappage scheme, Japan (down 44%) and Thailand (down 41%), and sustained momentum in China (up 26%).
| T k ark et s* ruc m O ri gi l E i t na qu pm en |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- Q rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
2 nd -Q rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| E uro pe |
-6 7 .4 % |
-6 2 .4 % |
-7 2 .4 % |
| 1 N ort h A ri me ca |
-4 7 .8 % |
-4 5 .1 % |
-5 0 .4 % |
| A si a |
% -2 1 .9 |
% -2 2 .2 |
% -2 1 .6 |
| S h A ri t ou me ca |
-3 0 % .7 |
-3 3 % .5 |
-2 8 .1 % |
| A f ri M i d d l e-E t ca as |
-2 5 .1 % |
-2 5 .1 % |
-2 5 .1 % |
| T al ot |
-4 4 % .5 |
*Radial only
1 United States, Canada and Mexico
In Europe, the original-equipment market continued its free fall in the first half, dropping 67.4% overall, 65.2% in the power unit tire segment and 74.3% in trailer tires. Truckmakers drastically drew down inventory as production slowed during the period, causing the collapse to gain momentum in the second quarter (down 72% versus a 62% decline in the first quarter). The more cyclical semi-truck segment considerably underperformed the straight-truck segment, while in the trailer-maker market, broadline manufacturers have been harder hit by the crisis than specialized manufacturers.
Change in Europe's Truck Original Equipment market In millions of radial tires
Europe excluding Russia - 12-month rolling
In North America, the average age of the truck fleet has risen to a record 6.3 years, a level not seen since the early 1990s. However, it is unlikely that the market will rebound in 2009. The tire market was down 50% in the second quarter after falling 45% in the first, for an overall decline of 47.8% over the first half.
In South America, demand continued to soften in the second quarter, with a decline of 28% extending the first-quarter's 33.5% drop, for a 30.7% contraction over the full six-month period. Both the power unit and trailer tire segments are suffering from the economic slowdown and the credit crunch.
Change in Brazilian Truck Original Equipment market In millions of radial tires 12-month rolling
In Asia, demand fell 21.9% overall in the first-half, with performance varying widely across the region. Mature markets were the hardest hit, with Japan down 64% and Australia down 23%, while emerging markets like China and Thailand saw smaller declines of 6.6% and 12.2% respectively.
Radials continued to increase their share of the original-equipment market, accounting for 56% of the total in first-half 2009, a one-point increase over the prior-year period.
12-month rolling
In the Africa Middle East region, the original-equipment market dropped by 25.1% overall, with Iran, Turkey and Dubai suffering the biggest declines.
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
% ch an ge |
|---|---|---|---|
| S al es |
7 ,1 3 4 |
8 ,2 3 9 |
-1 3 .4 % |
| E l ud i g C xc n urr en c y |
-1 5 .6 % |
Net sales stood at €7,134 million for the period, down 13.4% at current exchange rates compared with first-half 2008.
The decline reflected the 23.3% negative impact from the fall-off in volumes as demand plummeted, which was attenuated by the positive 9.6% price-mix effect. Pricing policies were held firm over the period, while the product mix continued to move up-market, thanks to the MICHELIN brand's solid resilience and a favorable replacement/OE market mix. The price mix improved by 11.0% in the first quarter and 8.2% in the second.
The currency effect was a positive 2.9%, as gains in the US dollar and, to a lesser extent, the Chinese yuan against the euro offset the declines in the British pound and the Brazilian real.
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 / 1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
1 st- Q rt 2 0 0 9 / 1 st- Q rt 2 0 0 8 ua er ua er |
2 nd -Q rt 2 0 0 9 / 2 nd -Q rt 2 0 0 8 ua er ua er |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T ot al ch an ge |
-1 ,1 0 5 |
-1 3 .4 % |
-5 7 9 |
-1 4 .2 % |
-5 2 6 |
-1 2 .7 % |
| V ol um es |
-1 ,9 1 7 |
-2 3 .3 % |
-9 9 8 |
-2 4 .4 % |
-9 1 9 |
-2 2 .2 % |
| P ri i ce m x |
+6 0 8 |
% +9 .6 |
+3 4 2 |
% +1 1 .0 |
+2 6 6 |
% +8 .2 |
| C urr en c y |
+2 0 4 |
+2 .9 % |
+7 7 |
+2 .2 % |
+1 2 7 |
+3 .6 % |
| S co pe |
- | - | - | - | - | - |
Michelin quarter on quarter net sales change:
Michelin net sales change by reporting segment is in line with the reporting adopted on January 1, 2005:
● Passenger car and Light truck tires and related distribution
● Truck tires and related distribution
● Specialty Businesses: Specialty tires (Agricultural, Aircraft, Two-wheel, Earthmover), Maps and Guides, ViaMichelin and Michelin Lifestyle
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 H al f 2 0 0 9 / st- 1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
1 Q st- rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
1 Q 2 0 0 9 / st- rt ua er 1 st- Q rt 2 0 0 8 ua er |
2 nd -Q rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
2 nd -Q 2 0 0 9 / rt ua er 2 nd -Q rt 2 0 0 8 ua er |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G ro u p |
7 ,1 3 4 |
% -1 3 .4 |
3 ,5 1 2 |
% -9 .8 |
3 ,6 2 2 |
% -1 2 .7 |
| P / L i gh k d l ed d i ri b i t t at st ut as se n ge r c ar ruc an re on |
3 ,9 4 9 |
-9 .4 % |
1 ,9 4 6 |
-2 4 .2 % |
2 ,0 0 3 |
-9 .0 % |
| T k d l at ed d i st ri b ut i ruc an re on |
2 ,0 7 1 |
-2 3 .2 % |
1 ,0 0 6 |
-7 .6 % |
1 ,0 6 5 |
-2 2 .2 % |
| S ci al t y B i pe us ne ss es |
1 ,1 1 4 |
-6 .1 % |
5 6 1 |
-1 4 .2 % |
5 5 3 |
-4 .5 % |
The MICHELIN brand strengthened its positions in the European replacement market at a time of sharply weaker demand. The sales mix continued to improve, led by the steady recent-year increase in sales of more premium vehicles equipped with larger tires.
In the original equipment market, scrappage schemes supported the sale of smaller models, with a more favorable impact on small MICHELIN tires.
The MICHELIN brand also fared well in the highly unfavorable North American replacement market, thanks to sustained demand for high-value tier-1 brands. Selling prices held firm over the period.
Original equipment sales contracted across the customer base.
Sales demonstrated firm resistance in the highly competitive Asian market, climbing sharply in China and India and outperforming the market in South Korea and Japan. Sales were also lifted by the recent improvement in the environment in the Asia-Pacific region. The Group continued to expand in China, in particular by opening new TyrePlus outlets.
Sales in South America were dampened by the introduction of new import procedures in Argentina, but boosted by the positive impact of the 2008 price increases and the up-market shift in the mix.
Sales in Africa Middle East were hurt by weaker demand.
In the European replacement market, Group sales were in line with the market, with a larger presence in Western Europe than in Central Europe and Russia. In the original equipment segment, power-unit and trailer tires outperformed the market.
In North America, Group sales held firm in a radial replacement market down 18%. The conversion of new dealers like Snider Tire Inc. to MICHELIN Retread Technologies helped to enhance the Group's product service offering.
In the sharply lower original equipment market, Group sales were supported by a positive mix and outperformed the market.
In South America, sales were in line with the market in Brazil. The introduction of new import procedures in certain Spanish speaking countries, such as Venezuela, weighed on sales performance for the period.
In Asia, replacement sales were led by operations in China, Australia and Thailand. In the original equipment segment, Michelin is more exposed to the decline in Asian carmaker exports.
In Africa Middle East, the Group strengthened its positions in Algeria and Saudi Arabia.
● Earthmover Tires: The Mining and Quarries segment is withstanding the economic slowdown, as mining companies rebuild their high-performance tire inventory. Global original equipment demand fell steadily throughout the period, especially in Europe and North America. Lastly, Infrastructure markets have slowed considerably in Europe and North America, but are holding up better in Asia.
Sales also showed firm resistance during the first half, reflecting Michelin's superior offfering and greater ability to satisfy demand particularly in the Mining and Quarries segment.
● Aircraft Tires: Airlines saw a decline in business in the first half, with a sharp reduction in the number of flights. Demand for radial tires was less affected, however, due to their superior durability and fuel efficiency. While the General Aviation business was hard hit, the Military market was stable.
Overall sales rose during the period, lifted both by contractual price increases and the market's continued shift to radials.
● Agricultural Tires: At a time of low economic visibility, original equipment demand fell sharply across every segment in the first half, with tires for high-powered farm machinery particularly hard hit. The replacement market was down considerably in Europe but demand for high-horsepower tractor tires was stable in North America. In all, Group sales declined in the period, especially in the original equipment segment. The decline in tonnage sold was only partly offset by the performance of the premium brands (MICHELIN, KLEBER) and the increase in unit selling prices.
● Two-Wheel Tires: Except for scooter tires, the "motorized" segment declined sharply in the mature country markets during the period, but continued to expand in the major emerging markets, albeit at a slower pace.
Sales fell off significantly as demand eased following the Group's strong sales performance in Europe and the United States in late 2008. However, they are expected to gradually benefit from the success of the MICHELIN Power One motorcycle tire line launched in the high-performance segment in early 2009 and from original equipment tires now delivered to Harley Davidson.
● The Maps and Guides business continued to pursue development programs in its three segments. In response to the sustained decline in the Maps market, Michelin is actively developing partnership agreements. The Tourist Guides business continued to broaden its international footprint. The "Never Without My Michelin Map" campaign was launched in France in partnership with Yahoo!, in order to promote the many advantages of Michelin maps and demonstrate the close fit between paper maps and GPS or digital mapping systems. Lastly, the Red Guide's 100th Anniversary Edition was an outstanding success, with strong bookstore sales and Apple iPhone application downloads.
● In first-half 2009 as the economic crisis deepened, ViaMichelin redeployed its business operations after focusing on services in 2008. The consumer website was completely revamped to improve ergonomics and add new functions, such as route finding and traffic and travel information. In the mobile-phone services segment, two offerings were developed for the Apple iPhone: a paid application with Michelin Guide restaurants in Europe and the United States and a free traffic information application that has proven highly popular in France. The Business Services segment suffered from corporate wait-and-see attitude in the current market environment.
At current exchange rates, consolidated net sales declined by 13.4% in the first half. Changes in exchange rates had a net positive impact of €204 million or 2.9%, as increases in the US dollar and the Chinese yuan against the euro offset the negative impact from declines in the Brazilian real and the British pound.
| A ve ra ge ch t ex an ge ra e |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
C h an ge |
|---|---|---|---|
| E / U S D uro |
1 .3 3 4 |
1 .5 3 1 |
-1 2 .9 % |
| E / C A D uro |
1 .6 0 7 |
1 .5 4 1 |
+4 .3 % |
| / E M X N uro |
1 8 .4 7 0 |
1 6 .2 5 2 |
% +1 3 .6 |
| E / B R L uro |
2 .9 2 7 |
2 9 8 .5 |
+1 2 % .7 |
| E / G B P uro |
0 .8 9 5 |
0 .7 7 5 |
+1 5 .5 % |
| E / P L N uro |
4 .4 6 9 |
3 .4 9 2 |
+2 8 .0 % |
| E / J P Y uro |
1 2 7 .3 0 6 |
1 6 0 .6 0 8 |
-2 0 .7 % |
| E / C N Y uro |
9 .1 1 5 |
1 0 .8 0 6 |
-1 5 .6 % |
| E / T H B uro |
4 6 .7 2 2 |
4 9 .4 3 6 |
-5 .5 % |
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 H al f st- 2 0 0 9 |
1 H al f 2 0 0 9 / st- f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 8 |
1 Q st- rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
2 nd -Q rt ua er 2 0 0 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G ro u p |
,1 3 4 7 |
-1 3 .4 % |
3 1 2 ,5 |
3 ,6 2 2 |
| E uro pe |
3 ,2 6 5 |
-2 2 .9 % |
1 ,6 3 6 |
1 ,6 2 9 |
| N ort h A ri me ca ( ) i l . M i nc ex co |
2 ,3 6 9 |
-5 .2 % |
1 ,1 5 6 |
1 ,2 1 3 |
| O t h er |
1 ,5 0 0 |
% -0 .3 |
7 2 0 |
7 8 0 |
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
% of t ot al |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
% of t ot al |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G ro u p |
7 ,1 3 4 |
8 ,2 3 9 |
||
| E uro pe |
3 ,2 6 5 |
4 .8 % 5 |
4 ,2 3 7 |
1 .4 % 5 |
| N ort h A ri me ca ( i l . M i ) nc ex co |
2 ,3 6 9 |
% 3 3 .2 |
2 ,4 9 8 |
% 3 0 .3 |
| O t h er |
1 ,5 0 0 |
2 1 .0 % |
1 ,5 0 4 |
1 8 .3 % |
The smaller 5.2% decline in sales in North America, compared with the 22.9% drop in Europe (including Russia), reflected the US dollar's sharp climb against the euro. Sales in other regions increased as a percentage of the total, to 21%, and were unchanged in absolute value.
In tonnage, emerging markets represented 32% of volumes sold, compared with 29% in first-half 2008.
Breakdown of Net Sales at June 30, 2008
| E U R i l l i pt h d at m on , e xc e pe r s are a |
f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 9 |
f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 8 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 / 1 H al f 2 0 0 8 st- |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 ( % of l ) sa es |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 ( % of l ) sa es |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S al es |
,1 3 4 7 |
8 ,2 3 9 |
-1 3 .4 % |
||
| C of t l os sa es |
( ,1 8 ) 5 5 |
( ,8 2 ) 5 4 |
-1 1 .0 % |
( 2 % ) 7 .7 |
( 0 % ) 7 .7 |
| G s i ros nc om e |
1 ,9 4 9 |
2 ,4 1 5 |
% -1 9 .3 |
% 2 7 .3 |
% 2 9 .3 |
| S al d ark et i es an m n g e x pe ns es |
( ) 7 8 5 |
( ) 8 2 7 |
% -5 .1 |
( % ) 1 1 .0 |
( % ) 1 0 .0 |
| R rch d d el t es ea an ev o pm en ex pe ns es G l d ad mi ni i st rat en era an ve ex pe ns es O t h rat i nd |
( 2 0 ) 5 ( 4 ) 5 7 8 5 |
( 2 ) 5 7 ( 8 1 ) 5 4 2 |
-2 % .7 .9 % -5 +1 0 2 .4 % |
( 3 % ) .5 ( % ) 7 .7 1 .2 % |
( 3 .1 % ) ( .1 % ) 7 0 .5 % |
| g i er o pe n nc om e a ex pe ns es O i g i e b ef rri g i nd rat pe n nc om or e n on -re cu n nc om e a ex pe ns es |
( ) 2 8 2 |
( ) 0 8 7 |
-6 0 .2 % |
( ) 4 .0 % |
( ) 8 .6 % |
| N rri on -re cu n g e x pe ns es |
( 2 9 2 ) |
- | - | ( 4 .1 % ) |
- |
| O ( ) / rat i l i pe n g os s nc om e |
( 1 0 ) |
0 8 7 |
-1 0 1 .4 % |
( 0 .1 % ) |
8 .6 % |
| C of t t d eb t os ne O h f i i al i nd t er na nc nc om e a ex pe ns es S h of of i t / ( l ) f ci at are pr os s rom as so es |
( 1 6 2 ) 2 4 3 |
( 1 1 6 ) 1 0 9 |
+3 9 % .7 +1 4 0 .0 % -6 6 .7 % |
( 2 .3 % ) 0 .3 % 0 .0 % |
( 1 % ) .4 0 .1 % 0 .1 % |
| ( L ) / I e b ef e t os s nc om or ax es |
( 1 4 ) 5 |
6 1 1 |
-1 2 3 % .7 |
( 2 .0 % ) |
.4 % 7 |
| I e t nc om ax |
2 3 |
( 1 8 1 ) |
-1 1 2 % .7 |
0 .3 % |
( 2 .2 % ) |
| ( ) / N et l i os s nc om e • A t t ri b ut ab l e t o S h h ol d are ers • A t t ri b ut ab l e t nt rol l i g i nt st o n on -co n ere s |
( 1 2 2 ) ( 1 1 9 ) ( 3 ) |
4 3 0 4 3 0 - |
-1 2 8 .4 % -1 2 7 .7 % n. m. |
( 1 % ) .7 ( 1 .7 % ) n. m. |
.2 % 5 5 .2 % n. m. |
| ( ) E i h i arn n gs pe r s are n e uro s • B i as c • D i l ed ut |
( 0 .8 2 ) ( 0 .8 2 ) |
2 .9 5 2 .8 9 |
-1 2 7 .8 % -1 2 8 .4 % |
GROSS INCOME
Group gross margin
as a % of sales
● Passenger car and Light truck tires and related distribution
● Truck tires and related distribution
● Specialty Businesses: Specialty tires (Agricultural, Aircraft, Two-wheel, Earthmover), Maps and Guides, ViaMichelin and Michelin Lifestyle
* before non-recurring items
| P C L T T T R D - A O I B N -R I AS SE NG ER AR AN D IGH RU CK IRE S A ND EL AT ED IST RIB UT ION NA LY SIS OF PE RA TIN G NC OM E EF OR E ON EC UR RIN G TE MS |
|---|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| P / L i gh t t k d l at ed d i st ri b ut i as se n ge r c ar ruc an re on E U R i l l i m on |
1 H al f 2 0 0 9 st- |
1 H al f 2 0 0 8 st- |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 / 1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 ( % of G p t ot al ) ro u |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 ( % of G p t ot al ) ro u |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S al es |
3 ,9 4 9 |
4 ,3 5 7 |
% -9 .4 |
% 5 5 |
% 5 3 |
| O ef rat i g i e b i g i t pe n nc om ore no n-r ec urr n em s |
2 4 7 |
3 3 2 |
% -2 5 .6 |
% 8 8 |
% 4 7 |
| O rat i gi n b ef i g i t pe n g m ar ore no n-r ec urr n em s |
6 .3 % |
7 .6 % |
-1 .3 pt |
Operating income amounted to €247 million versus €332 million in first-half 2008. The firm resilience of the MICHELIN brand, the highly positive price mix, improvements in production flexibility and cost reductions all helped to maintain operating margin at 6.3%, compared with 7.6% in first-half 2008.
| T k d l at ed d i st ri b ut i ruc an re on E U R i l l i m on |
1 H al f 2 0 0 9 st- |
1 H al f 2 0 0 8 st- |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 / 1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 ( % of G p t ot al ) ro u |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 ( % of G p t ot al ) ro u |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S al es |
2 ,0 7 1 |
2 ,6 9 6 |
% -2 3 .2 |
% 2 9 |
% 3 3 |
| O ( ) / ef rat i l i e b i g i t pe n g os s nc om ore no n-r ec urr n em s |
( ) 1 6 3 |
1 3 9 |
% -2 1 7 .3 |
( % ) 5 8 |
% 2 0 |
| O rat i gi n b ef i g i t pe n g m ar ore no n-r ec urr n em s |
( 7 .9 % ) |
5 .2 % |
-1 3 .1 pt |
The first-half operating loss of €163 million reflects the sharp contraction in volumes following the collapse of the original equipment and replacement markets. Production scalebacks and efficient management of inventories (which had reached target levels by June 30) also increased cost of capacity underutilization.
| S al 1 ,1 1 4 1 ,1 8 6 -6 .1 % 1 6 % 1 4 % es O i ( l ) / i e b ef i g i 1 9 8 2 3 -1 6 % 0 % 3 3 % rat t 7 .5 7 pe n g os s nc om ore no n-r ec urr n em s O ef % % rat i gi n b i g i t 1 7 .8 2 0 .0 -2 .2 pt pe n g m ar ore no n-r ec urr n em s O f % f f % f Q rat i gi d t h 2 0 rt ed i i rst -h al 2 0 0 8 , b ut i d t h i gh 1 7 .8 . W i t h t h pt i M i d rri ark et ai d pe n g ma r n na rro we rom e re po n re ma ne a a e ex ce on o ne s an ua es , m s rem ne v er ch al l gi g t h gh t t h e f i rst h al f . E art h i t h t' s k t ri b ut t rat i rf . T h e A gri l t l b i l i f t ed i t rf t h k s t o i en n rou ou mo ve r re ma ns e s e gm en e y c on or o o pe n g pe orm an ce cu ura us ne ss s pe orm an ce an m pro ve f t uri g f t pri nt d h d od t i ma nu ac n oo an en an ce pr uc m x. |
S ci al t y B i pe us ne ss es E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
f / 1 st- H al 2 0 0 9 1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 9 ( % of G p t ot al ) ro u |
f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 8 ( % of G p t ot al ) ro u |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| y d |
||||||
Although raw materials prices fell sharply across the board in the first half of 2009, they continued to have a negative impact on income due to the lag between the time of purchase and the time the materials were taken out of inventory. This lag, which is usually four months for synthetic rubber and six months for natural rubber, widened in the first half due to the sharp decline in volumes sold. In addition, valuing inventory at weighted average cost tends to smooth out fluctuations in raw material prices.
External costs as a whole (raw materials, logistics and energy) also continued to have a negative impact over the period, rising by €155 million, of which €117 million at constant exchange rate from raw materials alone.
Over the full year, lower raw material prices should add around €500-600 million at constant exchange rate to operating income compared with 2008.
Cost of Group raw material consumption (at constant exchange rate):
Breakdown of raw material needs for first-half 2009 in value (euros)
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
% ch an ge |
|---|---|---|---|
| T al pl e b ef i ot t st em o ye en co s |
2 ,2 8 0 |
2 ,4 1 2 |
% -5 .5 |
| A % of l t s a ne sa es |
3 2 .0 % |
2 9 .3 % |
+2 .7 pt |
| T ot al mb of pl l l at nu er em o ye es on pa yro J e 3 0 un |
1 1 2 ,4 9 8 |
1 2 1 ,0 2 3 |
% -7 .0 |
| A mb of pl ve ra ge nu er em o ye es |
1 1 4 ,3 0 5 |
1 2 0 ,9 0 3 |
-5 .5 % |
| N b of pl J e 3 0 at um er em o ye es un , f ul l t i i l t me e qu va en |
1 0 6 ,0 1 0 |
1 1 3 ,5 3 0 |
-6 .6 % |
Employee benefit costs represented 32.0% of net sales in first-half 2009, compared with 29.3% in the year-earlier period. This change mainly reflects the drop in net sales. In value terms, payroll declined by €178 million or 7.3% at constant exchange rates in line with headcount reductions. The programs undertaken to enhance production flexibility and the use of short-time working hours helped to significantly reduce employee benefit costs over the period.
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
% ch an ge |
|---|---|---|---|
| D ci at i d ort i t i e pre on an am za on |
1 4 7 |
2 4 5 |
.2 % +4 |
| A % of pi t al nd i t s a ca ex pe ure |
1 4 7 .6 % |
9 0 .4 % |
Depreciation and amortization rose 4.2% to €471 million, representing 148% of capital expenditure at end-June 2009. Over the full year, depreciation and amortization will exceed capital expenditure, which will be capped at around €700 million.
Press release
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
% ch an ge |
|---|---|---|---|
| of T rt at i od ran s po on go s |
3 7 3 |
4 8 8 |
% -2 3 .6 |
| A % of l s a sa es |
5 .2 % |
5 .9 % |
Transportation costs fell by 23.6% as reported and by 25.1% at constant exchange rates, as a result of the steep 23% decline in volumes and lower unit transportation costs.
As a result, transportation costs represented 5.2% of sales compared with 5.9% in the prior-year period.
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 f 2 0 0 9 st- H al |
1 f 2 0 0 8 st- H al |
C h an ge ( i al ) n v ue |
|---|---|---|---|
| C t of t d eb t os ne |
( 1 6 2 ) |
( 1 1 6 ) |
+4 6 |
The cost of net debt rose by €46 million over the first half, reflecting the following factors:
● The increase in net interest expense: €17 million, of which:
| € 8 i l l i ■ m on |
f f t h e i i d eb t , t o € 4 .3 b i l l i rom nc rea se n a ve ra ge on rom |
|---|---|
| n f f € 4 b i l l i i i rst -h al 2 0 0 8 on |
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 f 2 0 0 9 st- H al |
1 f 2 0 0 8 st- H al |
C h an ge ( i al ) n v ue |
|---|---|---|---|
| O t h f i i al i nd er na nc nc om e a ex pe ns es |
2 4 |
1 0 |
+1 4 |
Other financial income and expenses mainly include dividends, interest income and proceeds from the sale of financial assets. Their increase in first-half 2009 was primarily due to the net €17 million in proceeds from the partial repurchase of the Company's lowest ranking subordinated notes.
Non-recurring expenses amounted to €292 million, of which €151 million related to the plant specialization plan in France and €141 million to the manufacturing and sales reorganization plan in North America.
An additional expense will be recognized in the second half of the year, once the number of employees wishing to participate in the France voluntary separation plan can be reliably estimated.
| EUR million | 1st-Half 2009 |
1st-Half 2008 |
% change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income tax | (23) | 181 | $-112.7%$ |
| Current tax | 68 | 130 | $-47.7%$ |
| Withholding tax | 14 | 12 | $+16.7%$ |
| Deferred tax | (105) | 39 | $-369.2%$ |
| I e t ( 2 3 ) 1 8 1 -1 1 2 .7 % nc om ax C t t 6 8 1 3 0 -4 7 .7 % urr en ax % W i t h h ol d i g t 1 4 1 2 +1 6 .7 n ax D ef ed t ( 1 0 5 ) 3 9 -3 6 9 .2 % err ax A l t of t h i t i of d ef ed t t , t h e G rt ed t b ef i t s a re su e r ec o gn on err ax as se s rou p r e po a ax en of 2 3 i l l i i n f i rst -h al f 2 0 0 9 red i t h 1 8 1 i l l i t ch rl i € € m on co m pa w a m on ax ar ge a ye ar ea er. C N I E P S ON SO LID AT ED ET NC OM E A ND AR NIN GS ER HA RE O f 2 0 0 9 t l k t h Y o o o r e e a r u 1 st- H al f 1 st- H al f E U R i l l i % ch m on an ge 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 8 N et ( l ) / i ( 1 2 2 ) 4 3 0 -1 2 8 .4 % os s nc om e A % of t l ( 1 .7 % ) 5 .2 % -6 .9 pt s a ne sa es C rni g t h e b i vi nt , i t ori h t ed t on ce n us ne ss en ron me nv en es av e n ow re urn o m • A t t ri b ut ab l e t o S h h ol d ( 1 1 9 ) 4 3 0 -1 2 7 .7 % l el , b ut t t o t h xt t t h at M i ch el i t al k ab t l pt . T h are ers ev s no e e en n c an ou a rea u urn ( ) • A t t ri b ut ab l e t nt rol l i g i nt st 3 t h f ai nt ai i t ef f ort i t h nt h ah d l t h gh t h d l i o n on -co n ere s n. m. ere ore m n s s n e mo s ea , a ou e ec - t eri al pri h l d rt nd -h al f gi ma s ce s s ou su p po se co m ar ns E i h ( i ) arn n gs pe r s are n e uro s T h G i mi t t ed t rat i si t i f sh f l i n t h e rou p s c om o ge ne n g po ve ree ca ow e s ec on • B i ( 0 .8 2 ) 2 .9 -1 2 .8 % 5 7 as c ord t t i rvi g i t j b i et ri er o c on nu e se n s m a or us ne ss m cs |
|---|
| e G |
| ore ne d |
| no rou i h |
| pre • D i l ed ( 0 .8 2 ) 2 .8 9 -1 2 8 .4 % ut |
| E U R i l l i m on |
J e 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 un |
D b 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 ec em er |
T ot al ch an ge |
C f f t ur ren c y e ec |
M t ov em en |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G d wi l l oo |
3 9 9 |
4 0 1 |
-2 | -3 | +1 |
| O t h i nt gi b l et er an e a ss s |
3 1 4 |
3 1 0 |
+4 | -1 | +5 |
| P pl d i ( P P & E ) rt t t ro pe y, an an e qu pm en |
6 ,9 0 5 |
,0 4 6 7 |
-1 4 1 |
+1 1 5 |
-2 6 5 |
| N nt f i i al t nd ot h t on -cu rre na nc as se s a er as se s |
3 9 8 |
3 8 2 |
+1 6 |
+4 | +1 2 |
| I t nt s i i at d j oi nt nt nv es me n a ss oc es an ve ure s |
6 5 |
6 5 |
+0 | +0 | +0 |
| D ef ed t t err ax as se s |
1 ,0 0 6 |
8 9 6 |
+1 1 0 |
+1 0 |
+1 0 0 |
| N nt t on -cu rre as se s |
9 ,0 8 7 |
9 ,1 0 0 |
-1 3 |
+1 2 5 |
-1 3 8 |
| I t ori nv en es |
3 ,1 6 4 |
3 ,6 7 7 |
-5 1 3 |
+5 7 |
-5 7 0 |
| T rad ei b l e r ec va es |
2 ,3 9 8 |
2 ,4 5 6 |
-5 8 |
+3 2 |
-9 0 |
| C f t i i al t urr en na nc as se s |
7 0 |
1 7 3 |
-1 0 3 |
-0 | -1 0 3 |
| O t h nt t er cu rre as se s |
4 4 3 |
7 3 2 |
-2 8 9 |
+1 7 |
-3 0 6 |
| C h d sh i l t as an ca e qu va en s |
7 4 0 |
4 5 6 |
+2 8 4 |
-3 | +2 8 7 |
| C t t ur ren as se s |
6 ,8 1 5 |
,4 9 4 7 |
-6 9 7 |
+1 0 3 |
8 2 -7 |
| T O T A A S S E T S L |
1 ,9 0 2 5 |
1 6 9 4 ,5 |
-6 9 2 |
+2 2 8 |
-9 2 0 |
| E U R i l l i m on |
J e 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 un |
D b 3 1 , 2 0 0 8 ec em er |
T ot al ch an ge |
C f f t ur ren c y e ec |
M t ov em en |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S h pi al t are ca |
2 9 5 |
2 9 0 |
+5 | +0 | +5 |
| S h i are pr em um s |
2 ,0 2 5 |
1 ,9 4 4 |
+8 1 |
+0 | +8 1 |
| R es erv es |
2 ,7 5 3 |
2 ,8 7 4 |
-1 2 1 |
+1 2 8 |
-2 4 9 |
| N rol l i g i nt nt st on -co n ere s |
2 | 5 | -3 | +0 | -3 |
| T ot al i t e qu y |
5 ,0 7 5 |
5 ,1 1 3 |
-3 8 |
+1 2 8 |
-1 6 6 |
| N nt f i i al l i ab i l i t i on -cu rre na nc es |
3 ,6 4 1 |
3 ,4 4 6 |
+1 9 5 |
-1 2 |
+2 0 7 |
| E pl e b ef i t m o ye en s |
2 ,5 1 8 |
2 ,4 4 8 |
+7 0 |
+2 8 |
+4 2 |
| P i si nd ot h t l i ab i l i t i rov on s a er no n-c urr en es |
9 1 6 |
7 6 0 |
+1 5 6 |
+2 | +1 5 4 |
| D ef ed t l i ab i l i t i err ax es |
3 7 |
3 9 |
-2 | +0 | -2 |
| N l i ab i l i i nt t on -cu rre es |
,1 1 2 7 |
6 ,6 9 3 |
+4 1 9 |
+1 8 |
+4 0 1 |
| C f i i al l i ab i l i i t t urr en na nc es |
9 8 1 |
1 ,4 4 0 |
-4 9 5 |
+3 6 |
-4 9 5 |
| T rad b l e pa ya es |
9 0 3 |
1 ,5 0 4 |
-6 0 1 |
+2 7 |
-6 2 8 |
| O t h nt l i ab i l i t i er cu rre es |
1 ,8 3 1 |
1 ,8 4 4 |
-1 3 |
+1 9 |
-3 2 |
| C l i ab i l i i t t ur ren es |
3 1 ,7 5 |
4 8 8 ,7 |
-1 ,0 3 7 |
+8 2 |
-1 ,1 5 5 |
| T O T A L L I A B I L I T I E S A N D E Q U I T Y |
1 ,9 0 2 5 |
1 6 9 4 ,5 |
-6 9 2 |
+2 2 8 |
-9 2 0 |
Net intangible assets, excluding goodwill, and property, plant and equipment totaled €7,219 million at June 30, 2009, down €137 million or 1.9% from December 31, 2008. Excluding the currency effect, primarily resulting from the increase in the dollar against the euro, the decline would have been €252 million or 3.4%. Depreciation and amortization exceeded capital expenditure during the period.
Goodwill accounts for the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of assets and liabilities at the date when the commitment of acquisition is taken as well as the excess of the cost of purchased minority stakes over their book value.
Goodwill cannot be amortized. Goodwill is kept at cost after deduction of any cumulative loss.
Estimated acquisition cost adjustments depending on future events are allocated to goodwill.
Other than the impact of translation adjustments, there was no material change in goodwill at June 30, 2009 compared with December 31, 2008.
| E U R i l l i m on |
J e 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 un |
J e 3 0 , 2 0 0 8 un |
T ot al ch an ge |
J e 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 un % of l as a sa es ( 1 2- nt h l l i ) mo ro n g |
J e 3 0 , 2 0 0 8 un % of l as a sa es ( 1 2- nt h l l i ) mo ro n g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I ori t nv en es |
3 ,1 6 4 |
3 ,7 2 3 |
-5 5 9 |
2 0 .7 % |
2 2 .3 % |
| T rad ei b l e r ec va es |
2 ,3 9 8 |
2 ,9 7 5 |
-5 7 7 |
1 5 .7 % |
1 7 .8 % |
| T rad b l e pa ya es |
( 9 0 3 ) |
( 1 ,4 1 6 ) |
+5 1 3 |
5 .9 % |
8 .5 % |
| O rat i k i pi t al i t pe n g w or n g c a re qu rem en |
4 ,6 5 9 |
5 ,2 8 2 |
-6 2 3 |
3 0 .4 % |
3 1 .6 % |
Operating working capital requirement declined by €623 million, or 12%, year-on-year, and represented 30.4% of net sales, compared with 31.6% at June 30, 2008.
Average trailing 12-month inventories represented 24.4% of net sales, versus 22.7% at December 31, 2008.
Excluding the currency effect, inventories were down 15% for the period.
The value of inventory declined primarily due to the fall-off in volumes, but also as a result of lower raw materials prices. Inventory volumes ended the period down by 11% compared with December 31, 2008, reflecting the impact of the production flexibility programs implemented in the second quarter.
Trade receivables declined by €58 million to €2,398 million in the first half, with average trailing 12-month receivables representing 18.4% of sales at period-end, versus 19.4% at December 31, 2008. The decline also reflects the shorter customer payment periods. The Group is committed to reducing trade receivables to 16% of net sales.
No material guarantees have been granted to limit credit risk.
Equity
Compared with December 31, 2008, equity declined by €38 million during the period, primarily as a result of:
● Comprehensive income of: €33 million
■ The €122 million net loss was offset by a €128 million net translation gain and €27 million in other positive items.
● The payment of dividends and other allocations: €(150) million
■ The dividend reinvestment plan, offered for the first time this year, attracted more than half of all shareholders, enabling the Group to save €80 million in cash.
● The issue of new shares: €81 million
■ This amount included €80 million from the issue of new shares under the dividend reinvestment plan and €1 million from the exercise of stock options.
● Other items: €(2) million
Debt stood at €3,818 million at June 30, 2009, down €455 million from December 31, 2008. The sharp decline reflected the combined impact of the following factors:
● High free cash flow for the period: €575 million
● The payment of dividends: €(70) million
■ Following a cash savings of €80 million after more than half of all shareholders elected to reinvest their dividend.
● A negative currency effect, primarily due to the appreciation
of the dollar against the euro: €(26) million
● Other non-cash factors: €(24) million
Change in net debt from December 31 to June 30
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
|---|---|---|
| D eb t t o D b 3 1 ec em er |
4 ,2 7 3 |
3 ,7 1 4 |
| C urr en c y |
+2 6 |
-6 1 |
| f * F sh l ree ca ow |
-5 7 5 |
+4 4 5 |
| D i vi d d sh t en ca ou |
0 +7 |
+2 4 0 |
| O h ch i i t t er an ge n e qu y |
+1 1 |
+1 3 |
| A d d i t i t o i t nt i t nt on nv es me co mm me s |
-1 1 |
-4 2 |
| N ob l i t i nd f i e l ew ga on s u er na nc ea se s |
- | +7 |
| S d i el l co pe an m sc an eo us |
+2 4 |
+1 8 |
| D eb t t o J e 3 0 un |
3 ,8 1 8 |
4 ,3 3 4 |
| C h an ge |
( 4 5 5 ) |
+6 2 0 |
* Free cash flow = Cash flow from operating activities - Cash flow from investing activities
| C G E M |
C F M |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| S d ard & P r' t an oo s |
A- 3 |
A- 3 |
|
| S h ort t erm M d y' oo s |
P- 2 |
P- 2 |
|
| S t d ard & P r' an oo s |
B B B |
B B B |
|
| L g t on erm |
M d y' oo s |
B 2 aa |
B 2 aa |
| O ut l k |
S t d ard & P r' an oo s |
N t i e ga ve |
N t i e ga ve |
| oo M d y' oo s |
S t ab l e |
S t ab l e |
● On October 31, 2008 Standard & Poor's downgraded from "stable" to "negative" the outlook associated with Michelin's rating. The long-term rating remained 'BBB' while the short-term rating was downgraded from 'A-2' to 'A-3'.
● On July 24, 2008 Moody's eliminated the one notch between Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin (CGEM), the ultimate parent company, and Compagnie Financière Michelin (CFM). Consequently, CGEM's rating was upgraded to Baa2/Prime-2/Stable from Baa3/Prime-3/Stable.
| E U R i l l i m on |
e 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 J un |
e 3 0 , 2 0 0 8 J un |
|---|---|---|
| N et d eb t |
3 ,8 1 8 |
4 ,3 3 4 |
| T ot al i t e qu y |
5 ,0 7 5 |
5 ,4 4 4 |
| N et d eb t / E i t qu y |
7 5 % |
8 0 % |
| N et d eb t / E B I T D A |
2 .5 4 |
1 .8 5 |
Gearing stood at 75% at June 30, 2009, compared with 80% at June 30, 2008 and 84% at December 31, 2008. The decline was primarily attributable to the decrease in net debt.
Activity Report
Press release
Change in net amount recognized for defined benefit plans
| E U R i l l i m on |
ef ef D i d b i t ne en i pl pe ns on an s |
O ef ef t h d i d b i t pl er ne en an s ( ) i l ud i g h l t h nc n ea ca re |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N et nt at J 1 am ou an ua r y, |
8 0 2 |
1 ,6 4 1 |
2 ,4 4 3 |
2 ,5 6 3 |
| E h d i f f xc an ge ere nc es |
1 7 |
1 1 |
2 8 |
( 8 8 ) |
| E i d i h i g i e b ef i g i n t rat t x pe ns es re co gn ze e o pe n nc om ore no n-r ec urr n em s |
7 6 |
5 5 |
1 3 1 |
9 2 |
| C t ri b ut i i d t o t h e f d on on pa un s |
( 1 9 ) |
0 | ( 1 9 ) |
( 5 9 ) |
| B ef i t s d i t l i d t o b ef i ci ari en rec y pa en es |
( 1 0 ) |
( 5 8 ) |
( 6 8 ) |
( 7 0 ) |
| C h s i n t h of ol i d at i an ge e s co pe co ns on |
- | - | - | - |
| e S ( ) P l ch s i n t h e I t at t i g i t an an ge nc om em en no n r ec urr n em s |
2 5 |
( ) 2 4 |
1 | 0 |
| N et nt at J 3 0 am ou un e, |
8 9 1 |
1 ,6 2 5 |
2 ,5 1 6 |
2 ,4 3 8 |
Expenses recognized in first-half 2009 operating income in connection with employee defined benefit plans rose to €132 million from €92 million in first-half 2008, mainly due to the impact on plan costs of the collapse in global financial markets in the second half of 2008.
Total Group contributions to these plans during the period declined by €42 million to €87 million, as follows:
| ● C o f t ri b ut i i d t d nt i t i t ut i on on s pa un m an a ge me ns on s |
€ 1 9 i l l i m on |
|---|---|
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- |
● Benefits paid directly to employees €68 million
Contributions scheduled for the second half are expected to maintain total full-year contributions on a par with 2008.
| E U R i l l i m on A ch t ve ra ge ex an ge ra es |
f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 9 |
f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 8 |
V al ch ue an ge |
|---|---|---|---|
| E B I T D A ad j ed ( b ef rri g i nd ) t us or e n on -re cu n nc om e a ex pe ns es |
7 5 1 |
1 ,1 7 2 |
-4 2 1 |
| N sh ot h i nd on -ca er nc om e a ex pe ns es |
( 1 7 ) |
8 | -2 5 |
| C h i vi si i l ud i pl e b ef i t an ge n pro on s, nc n g e m o ye en s |
( 6 ) |
( 1 3 9 ) |
+1 3 3 |
| f N et i t i d na nc e c os s pa |
( ) 1 4 1 |
( ) 1 0 5 |
-3 6 |
| I i d e t nc om ax pa |
4 2 |
( 1 4 ) 5 |
+1 9 6 |
| C h i al of ork i pi al of i i t et t an ge n v ue w n g c a , n m pa rm en s |
3 3 4 |
( 6 0 8 ) |
+9 4 2 |
| Ch in in tor an ge ven y |
58 0 |
(4 53 ) |
+1 03 3 |
| Ch in t tr ad eiv ab les an ge ne e r ec |
96 | (5 1 ) |
+1 47 |
| Ch in ot he cei vab les d ble an ge r re an pa ya s |
(34 2 ) |
(1 04 ) |
-23 8 |
| C h f l s f rat i ct i vi t i as ow ro m o pe n g a es |
9 6 3 |
1 7 4 |
+7 8 9 |
EBITDA before non-recurring income and expenses fell by €421 million to €751 million from €1,172 million in first-half 2008, in line with the decline in operating income before non-recurring items. The increase in depreciation and amortization was entirely offset by change in impairment losses.
| E U R i l l i m on |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 / 1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 i al n v ue |
f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 9 % of l as a sa es |
f 1 st- H al 2 0 0 8 % of l as a sa es |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G rch of i nt gi b l et nd P P & E ros s pu as es an e a ss s a |
3 1 9 |
5 0 0 |
-1 8 1 |
4 .5 % |
6 .1 % |
| I t nt t ei d d ch i pi t al nd i t b l nv es me gr an s r ec ve an an ge n c a ex pe ure pa ya es |
1 0 1 |
8 4 |
+1 7 |
1 .4 % |
1 .0 % |
| P d s f l f i nt gi b l et nd P P & E roc ee rom sa e o an e a ss s a |
( 1 5 ) |
( 1 5 ) |
+0 | ( 0 .2 % ) |
( 0 .2 % ) |
| N et t gi b l nd i nt gi b l e i t nt sh f l ut i l i t i an e a an nv es me ca ow za on |
4 0 5 |
5 6 9 |
-1 6 4 |
5 .7 % |
6 .9 % |
Gross purchases of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment amounted to €319 million at June 30, 2009, or 4.5% of net sales, versus €500 million a year earlier, or 6.1% of sales. The Group is continuing to invest in capital projects in the growth countries of China, India and Brazil, but plans to cap full-year capital expenditure at €700 million.
The main capital projects were as follows:
● Projects to increase capacity at the Shenyang, China plant and to acquire land in India for the construction of a new truck tire facility.
● Projects to improve productivity and refresh lines in mold operations.
● Project to increase mining tire capacity at the Lexington, SC plant in the United States.
Free cash flow is reported before dividends and after acquisition of financial investments.
| E U R i l l i m on A ch t ve ra ge ex an ge ra es |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 9 |
1 st- H al f 2 0 0 8 |
V al ch ue an ge |
|---|---|---|---|
| C f s f h l rat i ct i vi t i as ow ro m o pe n g a es |
9 6 3 |
1 7 4 |
+7 8 9 |
| N gi b l nd i gi b l e i sh f l i l i i et t nt t nt ut t an e a an nv es me ca ow za on |
( 4 0 5 ) |
( 5 6 9 ) |
+1 6 4 |
| I s i h h ol d i d h f i i al t nt ot t nv es me n s are n gs an er na nc as se s |
1 7 |
( 0 ) 5 |
+6 7 |
| C h f l s f i i i vi i t ct t as ow ro m nv es n g a es |
( 3 8 8 ) |
( 6 1 9 ) |
+2 3 1 |
| F sh f l ree ca ow |
5 7 5 |
( 4 4 ) 5 |
1 ,0 2 0 |
The Group generated €575 million in free cash flow in the first half of 2009, compared with a negative €445 million a year earlier.
The improvement was led by the €580 million reduction in inventory over the period, the intrinsic gains driven by the transformation program and the reduction in account receivables' days of sales outstanding.
In addition, capital expenditure was sharply scaled back, to €319 million from €500 million in first-half 2008, without compromising the Group's sustained expansion in new growth markets.
Financial statements Related parties There were no new significant related party transactions during the first half of 2009, as well as no significant changes in the related party transactions described in the 2008 Annual Report. Concerning the potential compensation due to the two Non-General Managing Partners of Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin, in 2009, in the event of a forced resignation, the General Partners decided on 27 April 2009 to increase the percentage based on operating and financial performance criteria from 50% to 100%. Risk Management The Michelin Group's principal risks have been identified. They are described in the Annual Report 2008.
| 1st -Ha lf |
1st -Ha lf |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU R m illio n |
200 9 |
200 8 |
200 8 |
20 07 |
20 06 |
20 05 |
20 04 |
|
| Sa les |
7 ,13 4 |
8 ,23 9 |
16 ,40 8 |
16 ,86 7 |
16 ,38 4 |
15 ,59 0 |
15 ,04 8 |
|
| % c han ge |
-13 .4% |
-1.9 % |
-2.7 % |
+3 .0% |
+5 .1% |
+3 .6% |
N. A pp. |
|
| Tot al e lo be nef its ts mp yee cos |
2 ,28 0 |
2 ,41 2 |
4 ,60 6 |
4 ,73 2 |
4 ,71 8 |
4 ,78 0 |
4 ,83 7 |
|
| a % of sal as es |
32. 0% |
29. 3% |
28. 1% |
28 .1% |
28 .8% |
30 .7% |
32 .1% |
|
| f em s (f ) Nu mb plo ull tim qui val ent er o yee e e |
106 ,01 0 |
113 ,53 0 |
110 ,25 2 |
11 3 ,52 9 |
11 5,7 55 |
11 9 ,03 0 |
12 0 ,45 6 |
|
| (1) Re rch d d lo ent sea an eve pm ex pen ses |
250 | 257 | 499 | 57 1 |
59 1 |
56 5 |
57 6 |
|
| a % of sal as es |
3.5 % |
3.1 % |
3.0 % |
3.4 % |
3.6 % |
3.6 % |
3.8 % |
|
| A (2 ) EB ITD |
751 | 1 ,17 2 |
1 ,84 8 |
2 ,46 8 |
2 ,20 9 |
2 ,17 1 |
2 ,03 0 |
|
| O atin g in e b efo in g in nd per com re n on- rec urr com e a exp ens es |
282 | 708 | 920 | 1 ,64 5 |
1 ,33 8 |
1 ,36 8 |
1 ,30 3 |
|
| O atin in b efo in g in nd per g m arg re n on- rec urr com e a exp ens es |
4.0 % |
8.6 % |
5.6 % |
9.8 % |
8.2 % |
8.8 % |
8.7 % |
|
| O atin g in e (l ) per com oss |
(10 ) |
708 | 843 | 1 ,31 9 |
1 ,11 8 |
1 ,57 4 |
1 ,23 9 |
|
| O atin in per g m arg |
(0.1 % ) |
% 8.6 |
% 5.1 |
% 7.8 |
% 6.8 |
.1% 10 |
% 8.2 |
|
| Co st o f ne t de bt |
(16 2 ) |
(11 6 ) |
(33 0 ) |
(29 4 ) |
(31 5 ) |
(31 0 ) |
N. A pp. |
|
| Oth er f ina nci al i d e nco me an xpe nse s |
24 | 10 | (3 ) |
29 | 13 5 |
(28 0 ) |
(23 ) 5 |
|
| Inc e ( los s) b efo re t om axe s |
(14 5 ) |
611 | 520 | 1 ,07 1 |
94 2 |
1 ,30 0 |
98 5 |
|
| Inc e ta om x |
23 | (18 1 ) |
(16 3 ) |
(29 9 ) |
(36 9 ) |
(41 1 ) |
(33 1 ) |
|
| Effe ctiv e ta te x ra |
(15 .9% ) |
29. 6% |
31. 3% |
27 .9% |
39 .2% |
31 .6% |
33 .6% |
|
| Ne t in e (l ) com oss |
(12 2 ) |
430 | 357 | 77 2 |
57 3 |
88 9 |
65 4 |
|
| a % of sal as es |
(1.7 % ) |
5.2 % |
2.2 % |
4.6 % |
3.5 % |
5.7 % |
4.3 % |
|
| Div ide nds pai d to Sh hol der are s |
65 | 230 | 230 | 20 8 |
19 3 |
17 9 |
13 3 |
|
| Ca flow s fr sh tin ctiv itie om op era g a s |
963 | 174 | 915 | 1 ,86 2 |
1 ,19 1 |
1 ,03 1 |
1 ,32 2 |
|
| a % of sal as es |
13. 5% |
2.1 % |
5.6 % |
11 .0% |
7.3 % |
6.6 % |
8.8 % |
|
| Gro cha of inta ngi ble nd PP &E set ss pur ses as s a |
319 | 500 | 1 ,27 1 |
1 ,34 0 |
1 ,41 4 |
1 ,33 6 |
1 ,10 7 |
|
| a % of sal as es |
% 4.5 |
6.1 % |
7.7 % |
7.9 % |
8.6 % |
8.6 % |
7.4 % |
|
| Ca pita l ex ditu of dis als net pen re, pos |
405 | 569 | 1 ,23 7 |
1 ,37 8 |
1 ,27 7 |
1 ,20 8 |
95 1 |
|
| Ca sh flow s fr inv est in ctiv itie om g a s |
(38 8 ) |
(61 9 ) |
(1 ,27 4 ) |
(1 ,42 9 ) |
(1 ,23 0 ) |
(1 ,15 5 ) |
(1 ,05 6 ) |
|
| a % of sal as es |
5.4 % |
7.5 % |
7.8 % |
8.5 % |
7.5 % |
7.4 % |
7.0 % |
|
| bt ( 3) Ne t de |
3 ,81 8 |
4 ,33 4 |
4 ,27 3 |
3 ,71 4 |
4 ,17 8 |
4 ,08 3 |
3 ,29 2 |
|
| y (4 ) Tot al e qui t |
5 ,07 5 |
5,4 44 |
5,1 13 |
5,2 90 |
4 ,68 8 |
4 ,52 7 |
3 ,64 7 |
|
| Ge arin g |
75% | 80% | 84% | 70 % |
89 % |
90 % |
90 % |
|
| Ne t de bt / EB ITD A |
2.5 4 |
1.8 5 |
2.3 1 |
1.5 0 |
1.8 9 |
1.8 8 |
1.6 2 |
|
| Ca sh flow s fr tin ctiv itie s / Ne t de bt om op era g a |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
21. 4% |
50 .1% |
28 .5% |
25 .3% |
40 .2% |
|
| te ( 5) Ne t in har tere st c ge ave rag e ra |
6.1 % |
5.9 % |
6.0 % |
6.6 % |
6.3 % |
6.9 % |
N. A pp. |
|
| (6) O atin g in e b efo in g it s / Ne t in tere st c har per com re n on- rec urr em ge |
2.0 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 4.4 | N. A pp. |
|
| w (6 ) Fre ash flo e c |
575 | (44 ) 5 |
(35 ) 9 |
433 | (39 ) |
(12 ) 4 |
266 | |
| E (7 ) RO |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
7.0 % |
14 .7% |
12 .2% |
19 .7% |
18 .5% |
|
| (8) RO CE – R etu api tal plo yed rn o n c em |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
% 5.6 |
% 9.7 |
% 8.0 |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
|
| Pe har e d (in ) ata r s eu ros |
||||||||
| e (9 ) Ne t as set har s p er s |
34. 4 |
37. 5 |
35. 2 |
36 .7 |
32 .6 |
31 .5 |
24 .2 |
|
| Bas ic e in sh arn gs per are |
(0.8 2 ) |
2.9 5 |
2.4 6 |
5.3 2 |
3.9 5 |
6.1 3 |
4.4 6 |
|
| Dilu ted rnin sh ea gs per are |
(0.8 2 ) |
2.8 9 |
2.4 6 |
5.2 2 |
3.9 4 |
6.1 2 |
4.4 6 |
|
| (10) P/E |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
15. 3 |
14 .8 |
18 .4 |
7.7 | 10 .6 |
|
| Div ide nd sh per are |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
1 ,00 |
1.6 0 |
1.4 5 |
1.3 5 |
1.2 5 |
|
| te ( 11) Dis trib utio n ra |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
40. 7% |
30 .1% |
36 .7% |
22 .0% |
28 .0% |
|
| ld ( 12) Div ide nd yie |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
2.7 % |
2.0 % |
2.0 % |
2.8 % |
2.6 % |
|
| (13 ) Sh tur ate are nov er r |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
308 % |
21 6% |
21 2% |
15 1% |
13 4% |
|
(1) Pursuant to switch to IFRS, part of the Group's research and development expenses are integrated into the cost of goods sold in the income statement by function
(2) EBITDA: earnings before finance costs, income tax, depreciation and amortization
(3) Net debt after implementation of IAS 32 and IAS 39, effective January 1, 2005: financial liabilities - cash and cash equivalents +/- derivative assets (4) Total equity after implementation of IAS 32 and IAS 39, effective January 1, 2005
(5) Net interest charge: interest financing expenses - interest income from cash and equivalents + discount/premium amortization on forward foreign exchange contracts
(6) Free cash flow: Cash flows from operating activities - Cash flows from investing activities
(7) ROE: net income attributable to Shareholders / Shareholders' equity excluding non-controlling interests
(8) ROCE: Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT) / capital employed (intangible assets and PP&E + long-term financial assets + working capital requirement) (9) Net assets per share: net assets / number of shares outstanding at the end of the period
(10) P/E: Share price at the end of the period / earnings per share
(11) Distribution rate: dividend per share / basic earnings per share
(12) Dividend yield: dividend per share / share price at December 31
(13) Share turnover rate: number of shares traded during the year / average number of shares outstanding during the year
N. App.: Non applicable
| EU R m illio n |
20 04 |
20 03 |
20 02 |
20 01 |
20 00 |
199 9 form pro a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sa les |
15 ,68 9 |
15 ,37 0 |
15 ,64 5 |
15 ,77 5 |
15 ,39 6 |
13 ,76 3 |
| % c han ge |
+2 .1% |
-1. 8% |
-0. 8% |
+2 .5% |
+1 1.9 % |
+1 0.2 % |
| Pa ll co sts yro |
4 ,87 2 |
4 ,99 7 |
5,1 52 |
5,2 42 |
5,1 37 |
4 ,75 6 |
| a % of sal as es |
31 .1% |
32 .5% |
32 .9% |
33 .2% |
33 .4% |
34 .6% |
| Ave ber of plo rag e n um em yee s |
126 ,47 4 |
12 7,2 10 |
12 6 ,28 5 |
12 7,4 67 |
12 8 ,12 2 |
13 0 ,43 4 |
| Re rch d d lo ent sts sea an eve pm co |
674 | 71 0 |
70 4 |
70 2 |
64 5 |
58 9 |
| a % of sal as es |
% 4.3 |
% 4.6 |
% 4.5 |
% 4.4 |
% 4.2 |
% 4.3 |
| A (1 ) EB ITD |
2 ,04 3 |
1 ,99 2 |
1 ,97 8 |
2 ,09 1 |
2 ,17 0 |
2 ,12 7 |
| O atin g in per com e |
1 ,29 9 |
1 ,14 3 |
1 ,22 5 |
1 ,04 0 |
1 ,16 2 |
1 ,20 7 |
| O atin in per g m arg |
8.3 % |
7.4 % |
7.8 % |
6.6 % |
7.6 % |
8.8 % |
| Ne t in tere st e xpe nse |
(21 3 ) |
(22 ) 5 |
(26 0 ) |
(32 1 ) |
(31 4 ) |
(23 8 ) |
| Ne t no rin g in nd n-re cur com e a exp ens e |
(20 6 ) |
19 | 75 | (29 ) |
(76 ) |
(35 3 ) |
| of w hic h re stru ctu rin ost g c s |
(55 ) |
(19 2 ) |
(17 ) |
(34 0 ) |
(67 ) |
(38 8 ) |
| Inc e b efo re t om ax |
843 | 59 0 |
99 7 |
64 4 |
72 9 |
53 8 |
| Inc e ta om xes |
(31 6 ) |
(26 1 ) |
(38 2 ) |
(33 0 ) |
(29 0 ) |
(21 3 ) |
| Effe ctiv e ta te x ra |
5% 37. |
.3% 44 |
.4% 38 |
.2% 51 |
.9% 39 |
.7% 39 |
| Ne t in e b efo ino rit y in tere sts com re m |
527 | 32 9 |
61 4 |
31 4 |
43 8 |
32 5 |
| a % of sal as es |
3.4 % |
2.1 % |
3.9 % |
2.0 % |
2.8 % |
2.4 % |
| Div ide nds pai d to Sh hol der are s |
133 | 13 1 |
11 3 |
10 5 |
93 | 87 |
| s (2 ) Ne t ca sh vid ed b atin ctiv itie pro y o per g a |
1 ,33 7 |
1 ,54 2 |
1 ,53 4 |
1 ,26 3 |
1 ,01 7 |
1 ,01 4 |
| (3) Ca sh flow |
1 ,35 3 |
1 ,40 7 |
1 ,22 5 |
1 ,32 3 |
1 ,41 6 |
1 ,54 7 |
| a % of sal as es |
8.6 % |
9.2 % |
7.8 % |
8.4 % |
9.2 % |
11 .2% |
| re ( 4) Ca pita l ex ditu pen |
1 ,11 7 |
1 ,11 8 |
96 7 |
1 ,15 0 |
1 ,20 1 |
1 ,25 2 |
| a % of sal as es |
7.1 % |
7.3 % |
6.2 % |
7.3 % |
7.8 % |
9.1 % |
| (4) Ca pita l ex ditu net of dis als pen re, pos |
1 ,02 5 |
1 ,01 7 |
80 9 |
1 ,08 9 |
1 ,09 1 |
1 ,00 3 |
| Ac qui siti of i stm ent et o f di sal on nve s, n spo s |
106 | 22 9 |
62 | (18 4 ) |
166 | 25 5 |
| bt (5 ) Ne t de |
3 ,22 3 |
3 ,44 0 |
3 ,81 8 |
4 ,88 1 |
4 ,92 6 |
4 ,32 9 |
| (6) Sh hol der s' e qui y in clu din ino rit y in t tere sts are g m |
4 ,67 7 |
4 ,40 9 |
4 ,50 2 |
4 ,32 6 |
4 ,15 5 |
3 ,83 8 |
| De bt-t qui t tio o-e y ra |
69% | 78 % |
85 % |
11 3% |
11 9% |
11 3% |
| Ave e b in ost rag orr ow g c s |
5.9 % |
5.8 % |
6.2 % |
6.1 % |
6.5 % |
9.4 % |
| EB ITD A / Ne t de bt |
63. 4% |
57 .9% |
51 .8% |
42 .8% |
44 .1% |
49 .1% |
| s / Ne t ca sh vid ed b atin ctiv itie Ne t de bt pro y o per g a |
5% 41. |
.8% 44 |
.2% 40 |
.9% 25 |
.7% 20 |
.4% 23 |
| (7) Inte t ex res pen se |
209 | 21 9 |
27 3 |
31 1 |
32 4 |
41 9 |
| Inte (o atin g in e / inte se) t co t ex res ver per com res pen |
6.2 | 5.2 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 2.9 |
| w (8 ) Fre ash flo e c |
226 | 29 9 |
63 7 |
30 9 |
(24 1 ) |
(30 0 ) |
| E (9 ) RO |
11. 2% |
7.3 % |
13 .4% |
7.4 % |
10 .4% |
8.0 % |
| Pe har e d ata (in ) r s eu ros |
||||||
| e (1 0) Ne t as set har s p er s |
32. 1 |
30 .2 |
30 .5 |
29 .7 |
28 .5 |
26 .2 |
| Bas ic e in sh arn gs per are |
3.5 9 |
2.2 3 |
4.2 8 |
2.2 0 |
2.9 6 |
2.1 0 |
| Dilu ted rnin sh ea gs per are |
3.5 9 |
2.2 3 |
4.2 8 |
2.2 0 |
2.9 6 |
2.1 0 |
| (11) P/E |
13. 1 |
16 .3 |
7.7 | 16 .8 |
13 .0 |
18 .6 |
| Ne t di vid end r sh pe are |
1.2 5 |
0.9 3 |
0.9 3 |
0.8 5 |
0.8 0 |
0.7 1 |
| (12 ) Pa ut r ate y-o |
34. 8% |
41 .7% |
21 .7% |
38 .6% |
27 .0% |
33 .8% |
| ld ( 13) Ne t di vid end yie |
2.6 % |
2.6 % |
2.8 % |
2.3 % |
2.1 % |
1.8 % |
| e (1 4) Ca pita l tu rat rno ver |
134 % |
14 4% |
14 5% |
10 8% |
97 % |
10 5% |
(1) EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (2) Net cash provided by operating activities: cash flow + change in working capital
(3) Cash flow: net income before minority interests + depreciation, amortization and charges to allowances for impairment in value of fixed assets - changes in provisions -/+ net gains/losses on disposal of assets
(4) In 2001, excluding external growth transactions (SMW, EUR 167m) (5) Net debt: long and short-term debt (including securitization) – cash and cash equivalents
(6) Shareholders' equity including minority interests: common stock + paid-in capital in excess of par + retained earnings + net income + minority interests (7) Interest expense: borrowing costs for the year
(8) Free cash flow: cash flow - change in working capital - net investments (9) ROE: net income attributable to the Group / Shareholders' equity excluding minority interest
(10) Net assets per share: net assets / number of shares outstanding at December 31
(11) P/E: Share price at December 31 / earnings per share
(12) Pay-out rate: net dividend / earnings per share
(13) Net dividend yield: net dividend / share price at December 31
(14) Capital turnover: number of shares traded during the year / average number of shares outstanding during the year
Press release
EUR 5.983 billion, as at June 30, 2009
1,436,873 in the 1st half of 2009
Michelin features in two important Stock Exchange performance indices
Michelin also features in the main sustainability indices
(At June 30, 2009)
| S h i ( i ) are pr ce n e uro s |
1 H al f 2 0 0 9 st- |
2 0 0 8 |
2 0 0 7 |
2 0 0 6 |
2 0 0 5 |
2 0 0 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f H i gh t h ri od or e pe |
6 .2 0 4 |
9 .9 0 7 |
1 0 6 0 .7 |
3 .3 0 7 |
6 .2 0 5 |
.8 0 4 7 |
| L f h ri od t ow or e pe |
2 2 .6 9 |
3 0 .6 5 |
6 7 .7 5 |
4 3 .2 1 |
4 3 .7 5 |
3 4 .8 2 |
| H i gh / l t i ow ra o |
2 .0 4 |
2 .6 1 |
1 .5 7 |
1 .7 0 |
1 .2 8 |
1 .3 7 |
| L t as |
4 0 .6 1 |
3 7 .5 7 |
7 8 .5 0 |
7 2 .5 0 |
4 7 .4 8 |
4 7 .1 9 |
| C h t h ri od an ge ov er e pe |
+8 .1 % |
-5 2 .1 % |
+8 .3 % |
+5 2 .7 % |
+0 .6 % |
+2 9 .7 % |
| C C A i nd ri at i ex va on |
% -2 |
% -4 3 |
% +1 |
% +1 8 |
% +2 3 |
% +7 |
| M ark et pi t al i t i ( d of ri od , E U R b i l l i ) ca za on en pe on |
5 .9 8 |
5 .4 5 |
1 1 .3 0 |
1 0 .4 1 |
6 .8 1 |
6 .7 7 |
| e f A d ai l y t rad i ol t h ri od ve ra ge n g v um or e pe |
1 3 6 ,8 3 ,4 7 |
1 0 ,2 6 ,7 4 7 |
1 ,2 1 ,9 9 7 4 |
1 ,1 9 1 ,6 9 7 |
8 2 ,0 3 4 5 |
2 ,3 1 1 7 4 |
| A mb of sh ak i h pi al p t t ve ra ge nu er are s m n g u e c a |
1 4 4 ,9 9 ,4 2 2 7 |
1 4 4 ,4 9 ,2 1 5 5 |
1 4 3 0 ,1 0 1 ,7 7 |
1 4 3 ,3 9 0 ,4 0 5 |
1 4 3 ,3 8 ,0 2 7 5 |
1 4 3 ,2 0 ,4 8 5 7 |
| N b of sh rad ed h ri od s t t um er are ov er e pe |
1 7 9 ,6 0 9 ,1 3 3 |
4 4 5 ,5 0 8 ,2 6 6 |
3 1 0 ,5 7 7 ,0 7 8 |
3 0 3 ,8 7 8 ,1 2 6 |
2 1 6 ,4 0 7 ,6 9 1 |
1 9 2 ,2 5 8 ,4 7 0 |
| S h t at are ur no ve r r e |
N . A p p |
3 0 8 % |
2 1 6 % |
2 1 2 % |
1 1 % 5 |
1 3 4 % |
| i f i pt rat n e uro s e xc e or os |
1 H al f 2 0 0 9 st- |
1 H al f 2 0 0 8 st- |
2 0 0 8 |
2 0 0 7 |
2 0 0 6 |
2 0 0 5 |
2 0 0 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N et t as se s |
3 4 .4 |
3 7 .5 |
3 5 .2 |
3 6 .7 |
3 2 .6 |
3 1 .5 |
2 4 .2 |
| B i i as c e arn n gs |
( 0 .8 2 ) |
2 .9 5 |
2 .4 6 |
5 .3 2 |
3 .9 5 |
6 .1 3 |
4 .4 6 |
| (1) D i l ut ed rni ea n gs |
( 0 .8 2 ) |
2 .8 9 |
2 .4 6 |
5 .2 2 |
3 .9 4 |
6 .1 2 |
4 .4 6 |
| / P E |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
15 .3 |
1 4 .8 |
1 8 .4 |
7 .7 |
1 0 .6 |
| D i vi d d en |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
1 ,00 |
1 .6 0 |
1 .4 5 |
1 .3 5 |
1 .2 5 |
| D i st ri b ut i t on ra e |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
40 .7% |
% 3 0 .1 |
% 3 6 .7 |
% 2 2 .0 |
% 2 8 .0 |
| d ( 2) Y i el |
N. A pp |
N. A pp |
2.7 % |
% 2 .0 |
% 2 .0 |
% 2 .8 |
% 2 .6 |
(1) Earnings per share adjusted for the effect on net income and on the average number of shares of the exercise of outstanding dilutive instruments
(2) Dividend / Share price at December 31
At June 30, 2009
2.3% Employee Shareholder Plan
12.5% Individual Shareholders
26.8% French Institutional Investors
58.4% Foreign Institutional Investors
Breakdown of voting rights At June 30, 2009
Double voting rights are attached to shares held for more than 4 years.
Faced with persistently lackluster demand in early 2009, Michelin decided to temporarily adjust its production output. The decision, which reflects current market conditions, led to production cutbacks and stoppages around the world in the first half, with the impact varying depending on the workshop or plant. This has enabled the Group to reduce inventories, while continuing to pursue its medium and long-term strategy. The entire process is in line with the Group's commitment to constantly aligning its manufacturing operations with the prevailing economic environment.
Michelin North America has implemented a reorganization plan in response to the unprecedented drop in market demand. The manufacturing facility in Opelika, Alabama, which produces BFGoodrich and UNIROYAL brand passenger car tires, will close by October 31, 2009, and production will be consolidated at the BFGoodrich Tire manufacturing facilities in Tuscaloosa, Alabama and Fort Wayne, Indiana. The decision ensures the company will be better able to utilize the capacity of its remaining facilities in North America, stepping up the programs already underway to reduce costs and improve competitiveness. At the same time, Michelin is establishing a Michelin Development Program to assist in the creation of new jobs in the community and to help make the transition as smooth as possible for all affected employees. Michelin is also closing its commercial truck tread pressing plant in Querétaro, Mexico due to excess capacity in its North American retread operations. Production from the Michelin Retread Technologies (MRT) plant, which employs 80 people, will be transferred to the company's retread plants in the United States.
In June, Michelin France announced a program to:
● Upgrade its global research and development center in Clermont-Ferrand by investing more than €100 million to shorten time-to-market cycles for tires and services and enable the development of more innovative manufacturing processes
● Enhance the specialization of its production sites. The Montceau plant will be developed into a high-performance facility for earthmover tires and one of the largest rubber compound and metallic fabric centers in Europe. The Tours plant will set the benchmark for truck tires in Europe, particularly in the use of Michelin Durable Technologies. Production of Super Sport car tires using the C3M process will be consolidated in Clermont-Ferrand by transferring production from the Sodemeca plant in Noyelles-lès-Seclin, which will be closed. Lastly, light-truck and SUV tire manufacturing operations at the Cholet plant will be strengthened by integrating light-truck tire production from the Bad Kreuznach site in Germany.
Although it will eliminate 1,093 jobs, the reorganization program is designed to be implemented without any layoffs, thanks to a voluntary separation plan mainly involving pre-retirement arrangements, which will be open to all employees. In this way, employees impacted by the reorganization will be eligible for special early-retirement measures and facilitated inplacement opportunities.
The project reflects the Group's commitment to strengthening France's role as Michelin's strategic innovation center and to enhancing the productivity of its manufacturing operations in an increasingly competitive global marketplace.
PASSENGER CAR/LIGHT TRUCK TIRE BUSINESSES AND RELATED DISTRIBUTION
Michelin Confirms Its Lead In Fuel-Efficient Tire Technologies:
MICHELIN Energy™ Saver and Primacy HP tires have been awarded the highest rating in tests conducted by the German Automobile Association (ADAC), Europe's largest auto club. Both tires received a "highly recommendable" rating. The comparative test involved eighteen different 185/60 R 14 H tires and nineteen 205/55 R 16 W tires. Performance was measured according to five major criteria: dry grip, wet grip, fuel consumption, longevity and comfort (including noise).
Unveiled at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, the MICHELIN Energy™ Saver All-Season, the latest Green X* tire for the North American market, is designed for environmentally sensitive motorists who drive less than 16,000 km a year. The tire's technology improves fuel efficiency without sacrificing any critical safety features, such as wet braking. US market launch is scheduled for this summer. *Since 1992, the Michelin Green X label attests to a tire's ability to reduce fuel consumption, while delivering Michelin's traditionally superior safety and tread-life performance.
● MICHELIN Primacy LC Imprinted Green X Tire Successfully Launched in Asia The MICHELIN Primacy LC Imprinted Green X tire is significantly quieter thanks to its new silent rib technology, which attenuates tread-block vibration. Like all MICHELIN Green X tires, the MICHELIN Primacy LC improves fuel efficiency while delivering greater safety and durability. The tire was introduced in China, Japan and all of the Asia-Pacific countries between February and April 2009.
study. Michelin came in first with its luxury, passenger car and truck/utility tires. In each segment, four factors were examined to measure tire owner satisfaction: wearability, appearance, traction/handling and ride.
And for a six consecutive year, Michelin ranks highest in satisfying vehicle owners in Japan with their winter tires, according to the J.D. Power Asia Pacific 2009 Japan Winter Tire customer satisfaction Index Study.
innovation, saving 500 liters of fuel per truck per year while continuing to deliver superior tread life and improving safety performance with better grip. In particular, its
ENERGYTM Flex heat-stable casing reduces fuel consumption over the life of the tire. In this way, the MICHELIN ENERGYTM SaverGreen tire offers a compelling solution to the challenges facing today's trucking industry - to transport bigger loads faster and at lower cost, all while reducing its environmental footprint.
● The new multi-purpose MICHELIN X Multiway XD drive axle tire will enable large-capacity trucks in Europe to travel safely on all types of roads and in any driving conditions. Introduced in August 2009, the tire is the market's first in the 295/60R22.5-size that fits large-capacity and car-carrier trucks. The size enables truck manufacturers to design vehicles whose greater height increases load-carrying capacity, corresponding to a fast-growing segment of the road transport industry.
Michelin North America has signed an agreement with Snider Tire, Inc., the fifth largest independent truck tire distributor in the United States. Under the agreement, effective on May 1, Snider Tire, Inc. joined the Michelin Retread Technologies (MRT) network and acquired ten Tire Centers LLC tire and service outlets in Georgia and the Carolinas.
Anticipating the radialization of the Indian truck tire market, the Group has opened its first Michelin Truck Service Center in the country. The concept, already introduced in many other countries (particularly in the Asia-Pacific region), is designed to serve growing demand for radial truck tires.
In April, the new MICHELIN XHA2 tire was unveiled in a world premiere at the 2009 Intermat Show in Paris. Developed for small and mid-sized quarry and worksite loaders, the MICHELIN XHA2 is the newest generation of the MICHELIN XHA, the market benchmark since its launch in the late 1980s. The tire was designed to be particularly robust, with additional rubber incorporated in the tread, reinforced shoulders and sidewalls, and new crack rotation rubber compounds in the sidewalls. Thanks to these
features, the MICHELIN XHA2 tire lasts 10% longer than its predecessor, for greater productivity; delivers optimized traction; reduces fuel consumption and enhances safety. Lastly, the tire's patented tread design drastically reduces vibration and noise, for greater operator comfort.
At the Paris International Agri-Business Show (SIMA 2009), Michelin's booth was equipped with a return-on-investment simulator to demonstrate to farmers how their choice of tires could have a direct impact on operating costs, and therefore their profitability.
The result of four years of research, Michelin's exclusive Ultraflex technology offers a number of benefits, including improved traction through a 40% reduction in slippage, which reduces fuel consumption by up to 10% and cuts work time in the fields. In
addition, tires featuring Ultraflex technology do not compact the soil as much, which means less crop damage and significantly enhanced yields. Lastly, the tires offer optimized lifespan and on-road comfort thanks to their new rubber compounds and flat profile.
The latest offering from the hypersport range, the MICHELIN Power One, was unveiled in March on the Portimão racetrack in Portugal. With its new profile developed from racing tires, the MICHELIN Power One offers outstanding handling, both in racing and road use. The MICHELIN Power One range is available in a sculpted range and a slick/rain range (for racetrack use only), for a total of 27 tires and 16 different rubbers. A new site, www.michelinpowerone.com, helps users find the best choice for their particular motorcycle model and type of use.
Michelin and Harley-Davidson have joined forces to develop the all-new MICHELIN Scorcher "31" tire, which carries both companies' trademarks on its sidewalls and the signature Harley-Davidson logo carved into the shoulder. The all-new tire is available exclusively as original equipment on four 2010 Harley-Davidson Dyna models.
For the release of its 100th Edition, the MICHELIN Guide France made its entire selection available via iPhone. With just a few clicks, users can read the restaurant description (address, ranking, opening hours, awards and MICHELIN comments), access a map and itinerary, reserve a table and provide feedback on their choice. In late April, four new apps were launched in Europe (Germany, Spain & Portugal, Italy, United Kingdom) and two were introduced in the United States (New York and San Francisco). The applications are sold for the iPhone and iPod Touch via the App Store, where they may be found by searching for "Michelin".
For the second year in a row, ViaMichelin has won France's QualiWeb Award for Best Online Customer Relations in the Tourism and Transport category. The 2009 Award demonstrates ViaMichelin's commitment to offering effective support to everyone who uses the site's mobility assistance services.
The MICHELIN Guide restaurant selections for France, Italy, Spain/Portugal, Germany/Austria, Great-Britain/Ireland, Europe, New York City and San Francisco are now available as iPhone applications. Another iPhone app offering real-time traffic information in France has already been downloaded 200,000 times just two weeks after launch.
ViaMichelin has also signed a worldwide strategic agreement with Nokia concerning the supply of MICHELIN Guide selections (Hotels and Restaurants and the Green Guide) in Europe, the United States and Canada. The new service is now available on Nokia handsets equipped with the latest version of Ovi Maps.
On March 10, the European Parliament adopted new regulations concerning "type approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles," which set maximum performance thresholds for rolling resistance (car/light-truck and truck & bus tires), wet grip (car tires) and external tire noise. Tires sold in the European Union will have to gradually comply with the new criteria starting in 2012. In addition, all private motor vehicles will have to be equipped with Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS). The new regulations represent an opportunity for the Group and confirm the validity of its strategy based on innovation and balanced performance. Michelin is already well advanced in this direction, helping to develop mobility by reducing the environmental impact of its tires and improving their mileage performance, without sacrificing safety.
Over the next four or five years, Michelin is committed to developing its Lifestyle business, which manages trademark licensing for products that help to promote the Group's image and the MICHELIN brand among customers.
In particular, Michelin Lifestyle intends to strengthen its footwear business, where it operates in partnership with Babolat and Li Ning, and its licensed automotive products in countries like Brazil, China, Russia and India.
Michelin Lifestyle currently has 85 partners worldwide manufacturing or selling 1,500 MICHELIN brand products through 30,000 sales outlets.
The fourth edition of the Michelin Performance and Responsibility (PRM) Report, for 2007-2008, was published in the first half.
Financial statements
The 80-page report details the Group's perspective on the issues of road mobility and the tire industry. For each stage of a tire's life, it explains the actions deployed and objectives achieved.
The new report also provides 2007-2008 results concerning the ongoing deployment of the Group's sustainable development process in several areas of continuous improvement:
Lastly, the report includes a chapter on technological innovation and how it is delivering all-new benefits in areas other than tires. To support clean, sustainable road mobility, Michelin is not only bringing new tire ranges to market, it is also working on drivetrains and new energy sources.
The report may be downloaded in French or in English from www.michelin.com.
Michelin has joined the very exclusive circle of the "Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations", a list of companies from around the world whose strategy most effectively addresses sustainable development issues. Michelin is the only tire manufacturer on the list. Member of the DJSI World and STOXX indices, Michelin was ranked as a "Mover" (the company that improved the most in its industry) in the "Automobile & Parts" sector by the SAM* Sustainability Yearbook 2009, which each year lists the companies with the highest sustainable development performance. *Sustainable Asset Management (SAM) is a market-leading rating agency focused on corporate sustainability performance.
The Michelin Group successfully placed a €750 million issue of five-year, 8.625% notes on April 15. The very favorable investor response to the issue, which was heavily oversubscribed, attests to the market's confidence in the Group's creditworthiness. The issue helped to diversify Michelin's sources of financing and enhance its financial flexibility by lengthening the average maturity of its debt.
In addition, on June 15, 2009 Michelin launched a repurchase procedure aimed at all outstanding lowest ranking subordinated notes redeemable in cash due 2033 ("TSR"), corresponding to an aggregate principal amount of €350 million. During the repurchase procedure opened from June 15 to June 23, 2009 (inclusive), Michelin repurchased 53.5% of the aggregate principal amount initially issued. The transaction is part of the Group's active debt management process.
* In December 2003, Michelin issued €500 million worth of 6.375% subordinated notes redeemable in cash due 2033.
The Annual Shareholders Meeting took place on May 15, 2009 in Clermont-Ferrand. Michel Rollier, Managing General Partner, explained that in response to an unprecedented global economic crisis, the Group is focusing on its major business and financial metrics by carefully managing inventory and reducing capital investments and expenses. 2009 should benefit from lower raw material prices and a slight upturn in business. Mr. Rollier concluded his presentation by noting that: "We are confident in Michelin's ability not only to weather this crisis but to emerge from it stronger and ready to maintain our global market leadership."
Shareholders adopted all of the resolutions submitted for their approval, including:
● The payment of a dividend of €1.00 a share, with a dividend reinvestment option. The dividend will be paid or the shares settled on June 22, 2009.
● The re-election of Eric Bourdais de Charbonnière and François Grappotte as members of the Supervisory Board.
At their Joint Annual Meeting on May 15, Michelin shareholders approved the payment of a 2008 dividend of €1.00 a share, with a reinvestment option. The price of the new shares to be issued to shareholders electing to reinvest their dividend was set at €33.731.
At the close of the reinvestment period, which ran from May 22 to June 9, more than half of all shareholders elected to reinvest their dividend in new shares, representing a cash savings of €80 million for the Group.
Michelin Group 2009 Interim Financial Report 75
| C I S ON SO NC OM LID AT ED E TA TE ME NT |
7 7 |
|---|---|
| C S C E I ON SO LID AT ED TA TE ME NT OF OM PR EH EN SIV NC OM E |
7 8 |
| C B S ON SO LID AT ED AL AN CE HE ET |
9 7 |
| C S C E ON SO LID AT ED TA TE ME NT OF HA NG ES IN QU ITY |
8 0 |
| C C H F S ON SO LID AT ED AS LO W TA TE ME NT |
8 1 |
| N C I F S OT ES TO TH E ON SO LID AT ED NT ER IM INA NC IAL TA TE ME NT S |
8 2 |
| y G nf 1 l I at i en era orm on |
8 2 |
| f 2 y B i P rat i as s o re pa on |
8 2 |
| 3 y C d d S t R rt i on en se e gm en e po n g |
8 3 |
| 4 y N -R i g E on ec urr n x pe ns es |
8 4 |
| 5 y C t of N et D eb t d O t h F i i al I nd E os an er na nc nc om e a pe ns es x |
8 5 |
| 6 y E i P S h arn n gs er are |
8 6 |
| 7 y S h C pi t al d P i are a an rem um s |
8 6 |
| 8 y F i i al L i ab i l i t i na nc es |
8 7 |
| 9 y S h O pt i P l are on an s |
8 8 |
| 1 0 y P i si rov on s |
8 8 |
| 1 1 y D ai l f h e C h F l S et t t at t s o as ow em en |
8 9 |
| 1 2 y V ol y S i P t rat un ar e pa on ro gra m |
9 0 |
| 1 3 y R el ed P y T i at art ct ran sa on s |
9 0 |
| 1 4 y E s A f B al S h D nt t t at ve er an ce ee e |
9 0 |
| ( ) i n E U R i l l i pt h d at m on , e xc e pe r s are a |
N ot e |
S i t h nd ed x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 un |
S i t h nd ed x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 8 un |
|---|---|---|---|
| S al es |
3 | ,1 3 4 7 |
8 ,2 3 9 |
| C t of l os sa es |
( 5 ,1 8 5 ) |
( 5 ,8 2 4 ) |
|
| G s i ros nc om e |
1 ,9 4 9 |
2 ,4 1 5 |
|
| S al d ark et i es an m n g e x pe ns es R rch d d el t es ea an ev o pm en ex pe ns es G l d ad mi ni i st rat en era an ve ex pe ns es O t h rat i g i nd er o pe n nc om e a ex pe ns es O rat i e b ef rri nd |
3 | ( 8 ) 7 5 ( ) 2 5 0 ( 4 ) 5 7 ( 8 ) 5 2 8 2 |
( 8 2 ) 7 ( ) 2 5 7 ( 8 1 ) 5 ( 2 ) 4 7 0 8 |
| g i g i pe n nc om or e n on -re cu n nc om e a ex pe ns es |
|||
| N rri on -re cu n g e x pe ns es O rat i ( l ) / i pe n g os s nc om e |
4 | ( 2 9 2 ) ( 1 0 ) |
- 7 0 8 |
| C t of t d eb t os ne O t h f i i al i nd er na nc nc om e a ex pe ns es S h of of i t / ( l ) f ci at are pr os s rom as so es |
5 5 |
( 1 6 2 ) 2 4 3 |
( 1 1 6 ) 1 0 9 |
| ( ) / i e b ef L e t os s nc om or ax es |
( 1 4 ) 5 |
6 1 1 |
|
| I e t nc om ax |
2 3 |
( 1 8 1 ) |
|
| N et ( l ) / i os s nc om e |
( 1 2 2 ) |
4 3 0 |
|
| A t t ri b ut ab l e t o S h h ol d ƒ are ers A ri b ab l rol l i g i t t ut e t nt nt st ƒ o n on -co n ere s |
( 1 1 9 ) ( 3 ) |
4 3 0 - |
|
| E i h ( i ) arn n gs pe r s are n e uro s B i ƒ as c |
6 | ( 0 .8 2 ) ( 0 .8 2 ) |
2 .9 5 2 .8 9 |
| ( i n E U R i l l i ) m on |
S i t h nd ed x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 un |
S i t h nd ed x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 8 un |
|---|---|---|
| N et ( l ) / i os s nc om e |
( 1 2 2 ) |
4 3 0 |
| C h s i n f ai al of ai l ab l e-f l e f i i al t an ge r v ue av or- sa na nc as se s |
1 8 |
( 6 7 ) |
| C h s i n f ai al of sh f l h ed an ge r v ue ca ow ge s |
4 | - |
| C t of rvi d d l i nk ed t o t h h pt i ch os se ce s r en ere e s are o on s s em es |
5 | 5 |
| C t of rvi d d l i nk ed t o t h h rch pl os se ce s r en ere e s are pu as e an |
- | 1 5 |
| C y t sl at i d i f f urr en c ran on ere nc es |
1 2 8 |
( 2 6 ) |
| I e t l at i g t t h nt f h si i nc om ax re n o o er co m po ne s o co m pre en ve nc om e |
- | - |
| O t h h si i er co m pre en ve nc om e |
1 5 5 |
( 7 3 ) |
| C h si i om pre en ve nc om e |
3 3 |
3 5 7 |
| o S A t t ri b ut ab l e t h h ol d are ers • |
3 6 |
3 5 7 |
| A t t ri b ut ab l e t nt rol l i g i nt st o n on -co n ere s • |
( 3 ) |
- |
The notes 1 to 14 are an integral part of these consolidated interim financial statements
| ( i n E U R i l l i ) m on |
N ot e |
3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 un |
3 1 D b 2 0 0 8 ec em er |
|---|---|---|---|
| G d wi l l oo |
3 9 9 |
4 0 1 |
|
| O h i gi b l t nt et er an e a ss s |
3 1 4 |
3 1 0 |
|
| P rt pl t d i t ( P P & E ) ro pe y, an an e qu pm en |
6 ,9 0 5 |
7 ,0 4 6 |
|
| N f i i al nd h nt t ot t on -cu rre na nc as se s a er as se s |
3 9 8 |
3 8 2 |
|
| t nt s i i at d j oi nt nt nv es me n a ss oc es an ve ure s |
6 5 |
6 5 |
|
| D ef ed t t err ax as se s |
1 ,0 0 6 |
8 9 6 |
|
| N nt t on -cu rre as se s |
9 ,0 8 7 |
9 ,1 0 0 |
|
| t ori nv en es |
3 ,1 6 4 |
3 ,6 7 7 |
|
| T rad ei b l e r ec va es |
2 ,3 9 8 |
2 ,4 5 6 |
|
| C t f i i al t urr en na nc as se s |
7 0 |
1 7 3 |
|
| O t h nt t er cu rre as se s |
4 4 3 |
7 3 2 |
|
| C h d sh i l t as an ca e qu va en s |
7 4 0 |
4 5 6 |
|
| C t t ur ren as se s |
6 ,8 1 5 |
7 ,4 9 4 |
|
| T O T A L A S S E T S |
1 5 ,9 0 2 |
1 6 ,5 9 4 |
|
| S h pi t al are ca |
7 | 2 9 5 |
2 9 0 |
| S h i are pr em um s |
7 | 2 ,0 2 5 |
1 ,9 4 4 |
| R es erv es |
2 ,7 5 3 |
2 ,8 7 4 |
|
| N nt rol l i g i nt st on -co n ere s |
2 | 5 | |
| T ot al i t e qu y |
5 ,0 7 5 |
5 ,1 1 3 |
|
| N nt f i i al l i ab i l i t i |
8 | 3 ,6 4 1 |
3 ,4 4 6 |
| on -cu rre na nc es E pl e b ef i t m o en s |
2 ,5 1 8 |
2 ,4 4 8 |
|
| ye P i si nd ot h t l i ab i l i t i rov on s a er no n-c urr en es |
1 0 |
9 1 6 |
7 6 0 |
| D ef ed t l i ab i l i t i err ax es |
3 7 |
3 9 |
|
| N nt l i ab i l i t i on -cu rre es |
7 ,1 1 2 |
6 ,6 9 3 |
|
| t f i i al l i ab i l i t i urr en na nc es |
8 | 9 8 1 |
1 ,4 4 0 |
| C T rad b l e pa ya es |
9 0 3 |
1 ,5 0 4 |
|
| O t h nt l i ab i l i t i er cu rre es |
1 ,8 3 1 |
1 ,8 4 4 |
|
| C t l i ab i l i t i ur ren es |
3 ,7 1 5 |
4 ,7 8 8 |
|
| T O T A L L I A B I L I T I E S A N D E Q U I T Y |
1 5 ,9 0 2 |
1 6 ,5 9 4 |
| S h |
S h |
T | R es erv es |
N on |
T ot al |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| are pi t al ca |
are mi pre um s |
rea su r y sh are s |
T sl at i ran on |
O t h er |
R et ai d ne |
l l i nt co ro n g |
E i t qu y |
|
| ( i n E U R i l l i ) m on |
d i f f ere nc es |
res erv es |
i ea rn n gs |
i nt st ere s |
||||
| T ot al at 3 1 D b 2 0 0 7 as ec em er |
2 8 8 |
1 ,8 8 5 |
- | ( 5 8 ) |
1 9 1 |
2 ,9 7 6 |
8 | 5 ,2 9 0 |
| I f sh ss ua nc e o are s |
2 | 3 5 |
3 7 |
|||||
| D i vi d d nd ot h al l at i en s a er oc on s |
( 2 4 0 ) |
( 2 4 0 ) |
||||||
| C h si i om pre en ve nc om e |
2 0 |
( 2 6 ) |
( 6 7 ) |
4 3 0 |
3 5 7 |
|||
| O t h er |
1 | ( 1 ) |
- | |||||
| T ot al at 3 0 J e 2 0 0 8 as un |
2 9 0 |
1 ,9 4 0 |
- | ( 8 4 ) |
1 2 4 |
3 ,1 6 7 |
7 | 5 ,4 4 4 |
| E i t nt of ert i b l e b d qu y c om po ne co nv on s |
( 1 ) |
( 1 ) |
||||||
| I f sh ss ua nc e o are s |
( 1 ) |
( 1 ) |
||||||
| C h si i om pre en ve nc om e |
5 | ( 2 1 6 ) |
( 4 5 ) |
( 7 0 ) |
( 3 ) |
( 3 2 9 ) |
||
| O t h er |
( 1 ) |
1 | - | |||||
| T ot al at 3 1 D b 2 0 0 8 as ec em er |
2 9 0 |
1 ,9 4 4 |
- | ( 3 0 0 ) |
7 8 |
3 ,0 9 6 |
5 | 5 ,1 1 3 |
| I f sh ss ua nc e o are s |
5 | 7 6 |
8 1 |
|||||
| D i vi d d nd ot h al l at i en s a er oc on s |
( 1 5 0 ) |
( 1 5 0 ) |
||||||
| C h si i om pre en ve nc om e |
5 | 1 2 8 |
2 2 |
( 1 1 9 ) |
( 3 ) |
3 3 |
||
| O t h er |
( 1 ) |
( 1 ) |
( 2 ) |
|||||
| T ot al at 3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 as un |
2 9 5 |
2 ,0 2 5 |
- | ( ) 1 7 2 |
9 9 |
2 ,8 2 6 |
2 | 5 ,0 7 5 |
The notes 1 to 14 are an integral part of these consolidated interim financial statements
Press release
| N ot e ( i n E U R i l l i ) m on |
S i t h nd ed x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 un |
S i t h nd ed x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 8 un |
|---|---|---|
| N i et |
1 2 2 |
4 3 0 |
| nc om e E B I T D A ad t nt |
( ) |
|
| j us me s C of t t d eb t |
1 6 2 |
1 1 6 |
| os ne − O t h f i i al i nd |
2 4 |
1 0 |
| er na nc nc om e a ex pe ns es − I e t |
( ) ( 2 3 ) |
( ) 1 8 1 |
| nc om ax − A rt i t i , d ci at i d i i t of i nt b l et nd P P & E mo za on e on an m rm en an e a ss s a |
4 6 9 |
4 6 4 |
| gi pre pa − N rri g i nd on -re cu n nc om e a ex ns es |
2 9 2 |
|
| pe − S of s/ ( f ) f h l i t ci at are os rom as so es |
( 3 ) |
- ( 9 ) |
| pro − ( ef ) E B I T D A ad t ed b i nd us ore no n-r ec urr n nc om e a ex ns es |
1 7 5 |
1 ,1 2 7 |
| j g i pe O t h h i nd 1 1 |
1 7 |
8 |
| er no n-c as nc om e a ex pe ns es C ef h i vi si i l ud i pl e b i t an n on nc n m o en s |
( ) ( ) 6 |
( ) 1 3 9 |
| ge pro s, g e ye f N et i t i d 1 1 na nc e c os s pa |
( ) 1 4 1 |
( ) 1 0 5 |
| I e t i d nc om ax pa |
4 2 |
( ) 1 5 4 |
| C of of h i al ork i pi t al et i i t 1 1 an ge n v ue w n g c a , n m pa rm en s |
3 3 4 |
( ) 6 0 8 |
| C h f l s f i i vi i rat ct t as ow ro m o pe n g a es |
9 6 3 |
1 4 7 |
| of & 1 1 N et rch i nt gi b l et nd P P E pu as es an e a ss s a |
( 2 0 ) 4 |
( 8 ) 5 4 |
| s f f & P d l i nt gi b l et nd P P E roc ee rom sa e o an e a ss s a |
1 5 |
1 5 |
| A i si i f ol i d ed sh h ol d i of sh i red t at et c qu on s o co ns are n gs , n ca ac qu |
- | - |
| s f f of P d l ol i d at ed sh h ol d i et sh d i d roc ee rom sa e o co ns are n gs , n ca s po se |
1 0 |
- |
| P h of ai l ab l e-f l e i t nt urc as es av or- sa nv es me s |
( ) 5 |
( ) 5 7 |
| P d s f l f ai l ab l e-f l e i t nt roc ee rom sa e o av or- sa nv es me s |
1 0 |
2 |
| C h f l s f h f i i al 1 1 ot t as ow rom er na nc as se s |
2 | 5 |
| C h f l s f i t i ct i vi t i as ow ro m nv es n g a es |
( 3 8 8 ) |
( 6 1 9 ) |
| s f f P d i sh |
3 7 |
|
| roc ee rom ss ua nc e o are s D i vi d d i d o S h h ol d t en s are ers |
- ( 6 ) 5 |
( 2 3 0 ) |
| pa C h f l s f f i i al l i ab i l i i 1 1 t as ow rom na nc es |
( 2 0 ) 7 |
6 3 6 |
| O h f i h f l t er na nc e c as ow s |
( 1 6 ) |
( 6 0 ) |
| C h f l s f f i i ct i vi t i as ow ro m na nc n g a es |
( 2 8 8 ) |
3 8 3 |
| E f f of h h of t t at ec e c an ge cu rre nc y r es |
( 3 ) |
( 1 1 ) |
| I / ( d ) of sh d sh i l t nc rea se ec rea se ca an ca e qu va en s |
2 8 4 |
( 3 ) 7 |
| C h d sh i l t t 1 J as an ca e qu va en s a s a an ua r y |
4 5 6 |
3 3 0 |
| C 3 0 h d sh i l t t J as an ca e qu va en s a s a un e |
4 0 7 |
2 5 7 |
The notes 1 to 14 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin (CGEM or the « Company ») and its subsidiaries (together "the Group") manufacture, distribute and sell tires all around the world.
The Company is a Partnership Limited by Shares incorporated in Clermont-Ferrand (France).
The Company is listed on Euronext Paris (Eurolist Compartment A).
After review by the Supervisory Board, these condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been authorized for issue by the Managing Partners on 27 July 2009.
Except as otherwise stated, all amounts are presented in EUR million.
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements of the CGEM have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 - Interim Financial Reporting. They do not include all the information required for full annual financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the Group consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2008.
Except as described below, the accounting policies applied in these condensed consolidated interim financial statements are consistent with those applied by the Company in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2008.
Taxes on income in the interim periods are accrued using the tax rate that would be applicable to expected total annual earnings.
The following new standards and amendments to standards are mandatory for the first time for the financial year beginning 1 January 2009:
•IAS 1 (amended) – Presentation of financial statements.
The Group has elected to present two performance statements (the income statement and the statement of comprehensive income). Non-owner changes in equity, which are now required to be presented separately from owner changes in equity, are included in this new statement of comprehensive income.
The amended standard prohibits the recognition as expense of borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset. These costs are prospectively capitalized as part of that asset.
This new standard, which replaces IAS 14, requires a management approach under which segment information is presented on the same basis as that used for internal reporting purposes. Neither the basis of segmentation nor the basis of measurement of segment profit or loss is different from the last annual financial statements.
The following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are mandatory for the first time for the financial year beginning 1 January 2009, but are not currently relevant for the Group:
The Company has not anticipated the implementation of any standards and interpretations which are not mandatory as at 30 June 2009.
The preparation of the consolidated interim financial statements in conformity with IAS 34 requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the amount of income and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The acquisitions or divestments of the period did not have any significant effect on the condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
Usually cash flows during the first half of the year are mainly impacted by higher working capital needs and dividend payments.
However, during the first half of 2009, working capital needs have strongly decreased essentially because of the lower level of sales and management decision to reduce the level of inventory. In addition, the dividend has only partially been paid in cash as explained in note 7.
| i n E U R i l l i |
S i t h |
nd ed 3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 |
S i t h |
nd ed 3 0 J e 2 0 0 8 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( ) m on |
x m on s e O i rat |
un | x m on s e O i rat |
un | ||
| S al es |
g i pe n nc om e b ef or e n on - ri g i rec ur n nc om e d an ex pe ns es |
I nt n pe rce a ge f l o sa es |
S al es |
g i pe n nc om e b ef or e n on - ri g i rec ur n nc om e d an ex pe ns es |
I nt n pe rce a ge of l sa es |
|
| P r C d L i gh T k * t as se n ge ar an ruc |
3 ,9 4 9 |
2 4 7 |
6 .3 % |
4 ,3 5 7 |
3 3 2 |
7 .6 % |
| T k * ruc |
2 ,0 7 1 |
( 1 6 3 ) |
( 7 .9 % ) |
2 ,6 9 6 |
1 3 9 |
5 .2 % |
| S ci al y B i ** t pe us ne ss es T ot al |
1 ,1 1 4 7 ,1 3 4 |
1 9 8 2 8 2 |
1 7 .8 % 4 .0 % |
1 ,1 8 6 8 ,2 3 9 |
2 3 7 7 0 8 |
2 0 .0 % 8 .6 % |
| d l ed d i ri b i i vi i at st ut t t an re on ac es ci al y B i ( S ci al i ( h t t y t rt pe us ne ss es pe res ea mo GR AP HIC AL IN FO RM AT ION |
gri l l i af t ve r, a cu ura , a rcr |
d 2 h l ) t an w ee s , m a ps an |
d i d , V i aM i ch el i M i ch gu es n, |
el i n L i f eS yl ) t e |
||
| i n E U R i l l i ) m on |
S i x m on 3 0 |
h nd ed t s e J e 2 0 0 9 un |
S i h nd ed t x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 8 un |
|||
| ** s G EO ( S al es : |
||||||
| E uro pe |
3 ,2 6 5 |
4 ,2 3 |
||||
| N ort h A ri me ca O h t er zo ne s |
2 ,3 6 9 1 ,5 0 0 |
7 2 ,4 9 8 1 ,5 0 4 |
| (in EUR million) | Six months ended 30 June 2009 |
Six months ended 30 June 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Sales: | ||
| Europe | 3,265 | 4,237 |
| North America | 2,369 | 2,498 |
| Other zones | 1,500 | 1,504 |
| Total | 7,134 | 8,239 |
The Group announced a project aiming at a new specialization of some of its industrial operations in France. The objectives are the following ones:
A provision estimated to EUR 151 million was recognized covering the social costs, the equipment impairments and the costs necessary to deploy the revitalization plan implemented to help the affected regions.
Faced with the sustained consequences of the current economic recession on its markets, Michelin North America implemented in the first half an industrial and commercial restructuring plan. A non-recurring provision of EUR 141 million was recognized to cover the overall estimated costs of this plan, including severance expenses and equipment impairments.
This amount includes but is not limited to:
During the first half of 2008, no non recurring expenses were incurred by the Group.
| ( 1 2 5 ) ( 4 0 ) 1 1 ( 9 ) |
( 1 1 8 ) 5 |
|---|---|
| 2 | |
| ( 6 ) |
|
| ( 1 6 3 ) 1 |
( 1 1 7 ) 1 |
| ( 1 6 2 ) |
( ) 1 1 6 |
| 2 | 2 |
| - 2 |
1 8 |
| 4 ( ) 3 2 3 |
1 1 ( ) 5 4 |
| 2 4 |
1 0 |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Components of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations are presented in the table below:
| S i h nd ed t x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 un |
S i h nd ed t x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 8 un |
|
|---|---|---|
| N ( l ) / i ( E U R i l l i ) l ud i h rol l i g i et g t nt nt st os s nc om e m on , e xc n e n on -co n ere s |
( 1 1 9 ) |
4 3 0 |
| f o G - l si t i at t ri b ut i s t l P art es s pro po on s o on en era ne rs |
- | ( ) 5 |
| ( ) / o S of N et l i t t ri b ut ab l e t h h ol d ed i n t h al l at i t h e b i i h os s nc om e a are ers us e c cu on as c e arn n gs pe r s are |
( 1 1 9 ) |
2 4 5 |
| l i nt st ert i b l e b d - p us ere ex pe ns es on co nv on s |
- | 1 2 |
| ( ) / o S of N et l i t t ri b ut ab l e t h h ol d ed i n t h al l at i t h e d i l ut ed i h os s nc om e a are ers us e c cu on ea rn n gs pe r s are |
( 1 1 9 ) |
4 3 7 |
| of ( f ) of W ei gh t ed mb sh ut st d i t h nd sh ed i n t h al l at i b i i h av era ge nu er are s o an n g ou sa s o are s us e c cu on as c e arn n gs pe r s are |
1 4 4 ,9 9 7 |
1 4 3 ,8 8 8 |
| f l ad j t nt sh pt i pl nd ert i b l e b d - p us us me or are o on s an s a co nv on s |
- | 7 ,1 6 0 |
| of of W ei gh t ed mb sh d i n t h al l at i d i l ut ed i h av era ge nu er are s u se e c cu on ea rn n gs pe r s are |
1 4 4 ,9 9 7 |
1 5 1 ,0 4 8 |
| E i h ( i ) arn n gs pe r s are n e uro s |
||
| - b i as c |
( 0 .8 2 ) |
2 .9 5 |
| - d i l ut ed |
( 0 .8 2 ) |
2 .8 9 |
Diluted earnings per share are calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares. The Company has two types of potential dilutive shares: share options and convertible bonds.
Since the share options and the convertible bonds are antidilutive in 2009, they have not been considered in the calculation of the diluted earnings per share.
As at 30 June 2009 the total authorized number of ordinary shares is 147,370,738 shares (31 December 2008: 144,997,422 shares) with a par value of EUR 2 per share (2008: EUR 2 per share).
The ordinary shares increase is due to :
Dividend granted to the shareholders during the period is EUR 1 per share. The shareholders had the possibility to receive their dividend cash or the equivalent value in shares. It was settled as follows:
| T h yi t of t h e f i i al l i ab i l i t i i s d et ai l ed i n t h e t ab l e b el e c arr n g a mo un na nc es ow : |
||
|---|---|---|
| ( i n E U R i l l i ) m on |
3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 un |
3 1 D b 2 0 0 8 ec em er |
| L g-t on erm |
||
| B d on s |
2 ,1 2 9 |
1 ,5 0 1 |
| L f f i i al i i i nd h t t ut ot oa ns rom na nc ns on s a er |
1 ,3 8 4 |
1 ,7 7 1 |
| O b l i t i nd f i e l ga on s u er na nc ea se s |
8 8 |
1 4 0 |
| D eri i i t t t va ve ns rum en s |
4 0 |
3 4 |
| S h ort -t erm |
3 ,6 4 1 |
3 ,4 4 6 |
| B d nd i al on s a co mm erc pa pe rs |
2 9 3 |
7 6 3 |
| L f f i i al i t i t ut i nd ot h oa ns rom na nc ns on s a er |
5 9 5 |
6 3 5 |
| O b l i t i nd f i e l ga on s u er na nc ea se s |
6 6 |
3 8 |
| D eri t i i t t va ve ns rum en s |
2 7 |
4 |
| 9 8 1 |
1 ,4 4 0 |
|
| T ot al f i i al l i ab i l i t i na nc es |
4 ,6 2 2 |
4 ,8 8 6 |
| ( ) F i i al l i ab i l i t i na nc es |
4 ,6 2 2 |
4 ,8 8 6 |
| 1 7 |
||
| D eri t i t va ve as se s C h d sh i l t as an ca e va en s |
( 6 4 ) 7 4 0 |
( 5 ) 4 5 6 |
| qu N et d eb t |
( ) 3 ,8 1 8 |
( ) 4 ,2 7 3 |
| I n A pri l 2 0 0 9 t h e G p f ul l i d E U R 4 7 0 i l l i b d t at uri t nd i d E U R 7 5 0 i l l i b d at uri g i n A pri l 2 0 1 4 . T h rou y r e pa m on on s a m y a ss ue m on on s m n o 9 .8 7 5 % i f h e C y i s d d ed b el i ad e b l f i i ) t t t nt t st t at om pa n ow n gra ow nv es me gr y a ea on e o s r n g a ge nc y D uri g t h ri od , t h e C rch ed E U R 1 2 1 i l l i ( mi l ) of i t ub ord i t ed b d rat i of i t of E U R 1 8 n e pe om pa n y r e pu as m on no na s s na on s ge ne n g a pr m ( t e 5 ) no |
b d s b r i nt st at 8 .6 2 5 e n ew on ea ere i l l i i l ud ed i n " O t h f i i al i on nc er na nc |
% ( b j t t st su ec o a e p-u p nd nc om e a ex pe ns es |
| (in EUR million) | 30 June 2009 31 December 2008 | |
|---|---|---|
| Financial liabilities | 4,622 | 4,886 |
| Derivative assets | (64) | (157) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (740) | (456) |
| Net debt | 3,818 | 4,273 |
No share options were granted in the first half of 2009.
Movements of provisions included in "Provisions and other non-current liabilities" are as follows:
| ( i n E U R i l l i ) m on |
R t ct i es ru ur n g |
L i t i t i ga on |
O t h vi si er pro on s |
|---|---|---|---|
| A t 1 J y 2 0 0 9 an ua r |
3 1 9 |
1 1 0 |
1 0 3 |
| A d d i t i al i si on pr ov on s |
2 1 6 |
2 7 |
2 7 |
| U t i l i d d uri g t h ze n e ye ar |
( 5 4 ) |
( 2 0 ) |
( 2 6 ) |
| U d nt ed nu se am ou s r ev ers |
( 1 ) |
( 6 ) |
- |
| C y t sl at i ef f t urr en c ran on ec s |
( 3 ) |
2 | ( 1 ) |
| O t h ef f t er ec s |
( 1 ) |
1 | - |
| A t 3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 un |
4 7 6 |
1 1 4 |
1 0 3 |
Details of the cash flow statement are presented in the table below:
| ( i n E U R i l l i ) m on |
S i t h nd ed x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 9 un |
S i t h nd ed x m on s e 3 0 J e 2 0 0 8 un |
|---|---|---|
| N sh h i nd ot on -ca er nc om e a ex pe ns es |
||
| R ul d i l of n-f i i al t t es on s po sa no na nc as se s |
( 1 3 ) |
( ) 5 |
| O t h er |
( 4 ) |
1 3 |
| ( 1 7 ) |
8 | |
| N f i i d et t na nc e c os s pa |
||
| f I nt st i d d ot h i i al ere s pa an er na nc ex pe ns es |
( 1 6 ) 7 |
( 1 2 9 ) |
| f I nt st ei d d ot h i i al i ere s r ec ve an er na nc nc om e |
3 0 |
1 3 |
| D i vi d d ei d en s r ec ve |
5 | 1 1 |
| ( 1 4 1 ) |
( 1 0 ) 5 |
|
| C h i al of k i pi al of i i t et t an ge n v ue w or n g c a , n m pa rm en s |
||
| C h i n i t an ge nv en or y |
5 8 0 |
( ) 4 5 3 |
| C h i n t rad ei b l an ge e r ec va es |
9 6 |
( 5 1 ) |
| C h i t h ei b l d b l an ge n o er rec va es an pa ya es |
( ) 3 4 2 |
( ) 1 0 4 |
| 3 3 4 |
( 6 0 8 ) |
|
| of & N et rch i nt gi b l et nd P P E pu as es an e a ss s a |
||
| P h f i nt gi b l et urc as e o an e a ss s |
( 3 6 ) |
( 3 2 ) |
| P h f P P & E urc as e o |
( 2 8 3 ) |
( 4 6 8 ) |
| I t nt t ei d nv es me gr an s r ec ve |
7 | 7 |
| C h i pi t al nd i t b l an ge n c a ex pe ure s pa ya es |
( ) 1 0 8 |
( ) 9 1 |
| ( ) 4 2 0 |
( ) 5 8 4 |
|
| C of f h i al ot h nt d t i i al t an ge n v ue er cu rre an no n-c ur ren na nc as se s |
||
| I of ot h t f i i al t nc rea se er no n-c urr en na nc as se s |
( 1 1 ) |
( 1 7 ) |
| D of ot h t f i i al t ec rea se er no n-c urr en na nc as se s |
1 2 |
1 9 |
| N et ch of t h t h nt f i i al t an ge e o er cu rre na nc as se s |
1 | 3 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| C h i al of nt d t f i i al l i ab i l i t i an ge n v ue cu rre an no n-c ur ren na nc es |
||
| I of t f i i al l i ab i l i t i nc rea se no n-c urr en na nc es |
9 1 3 |
2 6 9 |
| D of t f i i al l i ab i l i t i ec rea se no n-c urr en na nc es |
( 6 4 4 ) |
( 1 5 3 ) |
| F i e l d eb t t na nc ea se re pa ym en s |
( 2 7 ) |
( 2 0 ) |
| N et i / ( d ) of nt f i i al l i ab i l i t i nc rea se ec rea se cu rre na nc es |
( 5 7 7 ) |
5 7 4 |
| D eri t i va ve s |
1 2 8 |
( 3 4 ) |
| ( 2 0 7 ) |
6 3 6 |
|
| D et ai l of t h sh t ct i e n on ca ran sa on s: |
||
| F i i al l na nc ea se s • |
- | 7 |
| N nt rol l i g i nt st rch mi t nt on -co n ere pu as e c om me s • |
( ) 1 1 |
( ) 4 0 |
| N i i ri gh t ew em ss on s • |
7 | 1 9 |
| D i vi d d i d i h en s pa n s are s • |
8 0 |
- |
As part of its ongoing management of jobs and competencies, the Michelin Group presented at the end of June 2009 a plan for voluntary separation in France. This plan which is still under discussion is to be implemented over the period 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012. Employees will be able to enroll starting 1 September 2009 through 30 November 2009. The plan includes two sets of measures:
Since this plan is currently being reviewed by the Employee Representatives and given that Group is unable at this time to estimate in a reliable manner the number of employees who may be interested by these potential options, the conditions necessary to recognize a provision were not met as at 30 June 2009.
There were no new significant related party transactions during the first half of 2009, as well as no significant changes in the related party transactions described in the 2008 Annual Report.
In July 2009, Double Coin Holdings Ltd. (Double Coin) announced that it will sell the 28.5% shares it owns in Shanghai Michelin Warrior Tire Co. Ltd (SMWT). Shanghai Minhang United Development Co., Ltd, another shareholder of the Company, will also sell its 1.5% share at the same time. The Group, which owns 70% of SMWT, has expressed its intention to purchase the shares for sale.
Société en commandite par actions au capital de 294 741 476 euros
Siège social : 12, cours Sablon 63040 CLERMONT-FERRAND
_____________ STATUTORY AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT ON INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR 2009
This is a free translation into English of the Statutory Auditors' review report issued in French and is provided solely for the convenience of English speaking readers. This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and professional auditing standards applicable in France.
In compliance with the assignment entrusted to us by the shareholders and in accordance with the requirements of article 451-1-2 III of the French Monetary and Financial Code (Code monétaire et financier), we hereby report to you on:
These condensed interim consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Managing Partners and have been prepared in a context of high volatility of financial markets and of economical and financial crisis making it difficult to assess business prospects, this context also existing when the December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements were prepared. Our role is to express a conclusion on these financial statements based on our review.
We conducted our review in accordance with professional standards applicable in France. A review of interim financial information consists of making inquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards applicable in France and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Financial statements ____________ Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions au capital de 294 741 476 euros Siège social : 12, cours Sablon 63040 CLERMONT-FERRAND _____________ STATUTORY AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT ON INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR 2009 Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the accompanying condensed interim consolidated financial statements are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with IAS 34 - the standard of IFRSs as adopted by the European Union applicable to interim financial information. Without qualifying our conclusion, we draw your attention to note 2 to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements, which describes the first implementation of IAS1 Amended. 2. Specific verification We have also verified the information given in the interim management report on the condensed interim consolidated financial statements subject to our review. We have no matters to report as to its fair presentation and consistency with the condensed interim consolidated financial statements. Neuilly-sur-Seine and Paris, July 27, 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit Corevise Member of Nexia International Christian MARCELLIN Stéphane MARIE Commissaires aux Comptes Members of Compagnies Régionales of Versailles and of Paris
To the best of my knowledge, I certify that the condensed financial statements for the first year-half have been prepared in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the Company's financial position and assets and liabilities and that of its subsidiaries included in the scope of consolidation, and that the interim activity report (pages 32 - 74 of this report) presents a fair account of the important events that occurred during the first semester of the year and of their impact on the financial statements as well as a description of the principal risks and contingencies for the remaining semester of the year.
Michel Rollier
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.