CODA MINERALS LTD - Capital/Financing Update 2021

==> picture [596 x 134] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE 22 June 2021

Thick Zone of IOCG Mineralisation Intersected at Emmie Bluff Deeps – Additional Information

ASX Code: COD

Coda Minerals Limited (ASX: COD, “Coda”, or “the Company”) refers to the release “Thick Zone of IOCG Mineralisation Intersected at Emmie Bluff Deeps” on 9 June 2021.

Following consultation with ASX, the Company attaches an updated release which includes additional information as requested by ASX.

—

This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Coda Minerals Ltd

Further Information:

Chris Stevens Chief Executive Officer

Coda Minerals Limited [email protected]

Media:

Nicholas Read

Read Corporate [email protected]

==> picture [77 x 78] intentionally omitted <==

E: [email protected] ABN 49 625 763 957

6 Altona Street West Perth Western Australia, 6005

==> picture [596 x 134] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE 22 June 2021 ASX Code: COD

Thick Zone of IOCG Mineralisation Intersected at Emmie Bluff

Deeps

First deep diamond hole intersects 200m of intense IOCG alteration including approximately 50m of copper sulphide mineralisation.

Highlights

Highly encouraging preliminary results received from DD21EB0018, the first deep diamond drillhole at the Emmie Bluff Deeps Iron Oxide Copper Gold (IOCG) prospect.
DD21EB0018 has encountered a sequence of approximately 200m of intensely haematitic and altered sediments and granites, including approximately 50m of moderate to intense copper sulphide mineralisation, including chalcocite, chalcopyrite and bornite.
The host-rock alteration assemblage encountered includes chlorite, baryte, sericite and potassium feldspar, all typical of IOCG deposits in the region.
IOCG deposits of this type in the immediate region include BHP’s Oak Dam West discovery (~16km north-east) and Oz Minerals’ Carrapateena Project (~50km east).
Portable XRF readings have confirmed the presence of copper, as well as highly elevated levels of pathfinder elements such as Lanthanum, Cerium, Cobalt and Molybdenum.
Drill core will be processed and assayed as soon as practicable.
Coda is preparing to mobilise an additional diamond rig to follow up on this significant result .

Coda Minerals Limited (ASX: COD, “Coda”, or “the Company”), in conjunction with its joint venture partner Torrens Mining Limited (ASX: TRN), a listed gold and copper company (“Torrens”), is pleased to announce preliminary results from drill-hole DD21EB0018, the first deep diamond hole designed to test its Emmie Bluff Deeps IOCG target at the Elizabeth Creek Project.

The drillhole has encountered a 200m sequence of intense haematisation and alteration, including a 50m sequence of zoned copper sulphide mineralisation, consisting of chalcocite, chalcopyrite and bornite zones.

Discussing the results, Chairman Keith Jones said: “We have long known we are exploring in elephant country – a view backed up not only by the world class projects which surround us, but also by historical and geophysical evidence of an IOCG system in the northern part of our tenure. Given that we knew the enormous potential of our tenure, it is still tremendously exciting for our first deep exploration hole at Elizabeth Creek to have intersected evidence of a major IOCG system existing on our ground. This is the first drill-backed evidence obtained by Coda to support our IOCG exploration model. We are looking forward to exploring the significant potential of this mineralised system.”

==> picture [77 x 78] intentionally omitted <==

E: [email protected] ABN 49 625 763 957

6 Altona Street West Perth Western Australia, 6005

==> picture [595 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

About Emmie Bluff Deeps

Emmie Bluff Deeps is a geophysically targeted IOCG prospect which forms part of the Company’s Elizabeth Creek Project located in the heart of the Olympic Copper Province in South Australia (see Figure 2). Coda is the operator and majority owner of the Elizabeth Creek Project, holding a 70% interest alongside Torrens Mining (ASX: TRN), which holds a 30% interest.

The Elizabeth Creek Copper Project encompasses two priority targets, with the current drilling program having commenced on 20 May 2021. These targets are:

The Emmie Bluff Copper-Cobalt Deposit , a laterally extensive, flat-lying, sediment-hosted copper-cobalt deposit at approximately 400m deep, over which the company established an Exploration Target in 2019; and
The Emmie Bluff IOCG Deeps prospect, which lies in the basement rocks below Emmie Bluff, approximately 7001,000m deep. The target at Emmie Bluff Deeps is iron-oxide copper-gold (IOCG) mineralisation, which is mined in the region at the Olympic Dam, Carrapateena and Prominent Hill mines.

This release contains preliminary results from the first hole of the programme at the Emmie Bluff Deeps IOCG target. Coda is also currently drilling the overlying Emmie Bluff Copper-Cobalt deposit with the expectation of delivering a Maiden Resource in Q3 of this year.

Hole DD21EB0018 , was drilled vertically using a diamond drill rig from surface, encountering locally typical Neoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic sediments to a depth of 666m down-hole. At this point it intersected a geological unconformity, below which it passed through approximately 200m thick zone of intense alteration and haematisation. This altered zone included a 58m zone of almost complete replacement by haematite in a thick “cap” of haematite in brecciated metasiltsone interpreted to be part of the Wandearah Formation.

Portable-XRF readings of this haematite cap material indicate the presence of highly anomalous Lanthanum and Cerium, both of which are considered to be key pathfinder elements for IOCG systems.

Beneath this haematite cap, the drill hole encountered approximately 70m of strongly altered granite, interpreted to be intrusive Hiltaba Suite granites. This granite was followed by an approximately 50m zone of variably intensive haematite altered metasediments with a significant copper sulphide component, starting from approximately 797m down-hole (see Figure 1).

The Copper Sulphides exhibit zoning with depth, with the highly altered zone consisting of:

796.5 – 802.2: an upper zone of disseminated and blebby chalcocite (Minor to moderate) and bornite (minor) in massive haematite.
802.2 - 810.8: a narrow zone of chloritic and haematised sediment (trace to absent sulphides)
810.8 – 838.9: a strongly haematised middle zone, dominated by chalcopyrite (variable, minor to moderate in the upper third, increasing to moderate to intense in the lower two thirds) and accessory bornite in blebs and accumulations typically (though not universally) aligned with the remnant sedimentary structures and with elevated molybdenum and cobalt levels detected by portable XRF, and
838.9 – 846.8: a lower zone, including both bornite (moderate after a narrow zone of trace to minor where silica alteration dominates) and chalcopyrite (minor to moderate after a narrow zone of trace to minor where silica alteration dominates), again primarily in blebs and veinlets.

Portable XRF readings confirm elevated copper associated with these sulphides in all of the three sulphide zones, as well as the presence of IOCG indicator elements such as cobalt and barium. It is important to note that these readings are yet to be formally confirmed by an assay laboratory and are considered to be an indicator only at this time.

==> picture [78 x 78] intentionally omitted <==

HoleID	Easting	Northing	Dip	EOH
IHAD2	705450	6557500	-90	1158.8
IHAD5	705119	6557882	-90	1152.8
IHAD6	704806	6558260	-90	1116.7
MGD 55	704100	6555500	-90	1107.3
MGD 57	705350	6556700	-90	1242.9
SAE 1	701879	6554852	-90	818
SAE 3	704379	6555352	-90	1221
SAE 4	704179	6556172	-90	1172.5
SAE 5	706029	6557322	-90	914.4
SAE 6	705029	6556222	-90	1200
SAE 7	701779	6554402	-90	1221.7

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling	•	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,	•	Core was logged in the field and rough metal content was measured at regular
techniques		random chips, or specific specialised industry		intervals with a portable XRF device at measurement intervals of between 1
		standard measurement tools appropriate to the		and 0.5m. Sampling intervals were selected by field geologist based on logging
		minerals under investigation, such as down hole		and XRF results.
		gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	•	Understanding of the mineralising system based on historical drilling and the XRF results allowed large parts of the holes to remain unsampled. Typically, sampling is restricted to areas of strong hydrothermal alteration, particularly haematisation.
	•	Include reference to measures taken to ensure	•	Handheld XRF instruments are extremely susceptible to sampling location bias,
		sample representivity and the appropriate		which can introduce considerable error. For this reason, Coda treats the results
		calibration of any measurement tools or systems		from the handheld XRF as indicative of the presence of metals only and has
		used.		chosen not to release the results as they are not considered sufficiently
	•	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation		accurate and may mislead as to the true nature of the intersected material.
		that are Material to the Public Report.	•	Coda’s field personnel are (as of the time of release) preparing the core for
	•	In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been		transport to Adelaide where it will be cut and sampled for assay. Results of
		done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse		these assays will then be released to the market.
		circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more	•	Portable XRF readings were taken in the field using an Olympus Vanta M tool applied directly to the core at either single or half metre intervals, depending on prior results or visual identification of potential grade by the field geologist. The sample was not prepared except by standard cleaning of core by drill
		explanation may be required, such as where there		offsiders. Readings were taken at ambient winter daytime temperature for
		is coarse gold that has inherent sampling		Woomera in South Australia, between 10 and 25 degrees C.
		problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation	•	The device was used in 3-beam mode, scanning for a total of 30, 30 and 20
		types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant		seconds for the two 40 KV beams and the final 50KV beam respectively. The
		disclosure of detailed information.		device is designed to minimise drift over time, and is less than 12 months old,
				and so has not been calibrated since leaving the factory. The results have not
				been corrected or otherwise adjusted.
			•	Minor QA/QC is performed during reading, including duplicates and a series of
				standards and blanks taken at the start of each recordingcycle.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Drilling	•	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole	•	DD21EB0018 was drilled from surface to 160m using PQ diamond bits, reducing
techniques		hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic,		to HQ3 to 501m, and has continued using NQ.
		etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or	•	Core orientations are not considered relevant due to the vertical nature of the
		standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-		hole.
		sampling bit or other type, whether core is
		oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Drill sample	•	Method of recording and assessing core and chip	•	Recovery of diamond tails was consistently excellent, with minimal core loss.
recovery		sample recoveries and results assessed.	•	No relationship is believed to exist between sample recovery and grade.
	•	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and
		ensure representative nature of the samples.
	•	Whether a relationship exists between sample
		recovery and grade and whether sample bias may
		have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
		fine/coarse material.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Code explanation				Commentary	Commentary
Logging	•	Whether	core	and	chip samples have	been	•	Detailed qualitative geological logging has been carried out by appropriately
		geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of						trained and experienced field geologists on all diamond core. Quantitative
		detail to	support appropriate Mineral Resource					logging by means of portable XRF has been undertaken on an as needed basis
		estimation, mining			studies and metallurgical			in areas of prospectivity, typically utilising a 1m interval with interval reduction
		studies.						down to 0.5m in areas of suspected mineralisation.
	•	Whether	logging is qualitative or quantitative in				•	For the purposes of describing mineral (particularly sulphide) abundance, the
		nature.	Core	(or	costean, channel,	etc)		following descriptors have been used:
		photography.						Trace:Logged occasionally by field geologists within the logged interval, but
	•	The total	length	and	percentage of the relevant			not sufficient to estimate a percentage. Typically, <0.5% mineral abundance.
		intersections logged.						Minor:Logged regularly by field geologists but does not make up a significant amount of the rock volume. Typically <5% mineral abundance.
								Moderate:Easily noted and logged by field geologists, makes up a significant
								amount of rock volume but is not a dominant component. Estimated to fall
								within a range of 5-15% mineral abundance.
								Intense:Very easily noted by field geologists, makes up a significant
								percentage of the rock volume and is a dominant component (15 – 50%
								mineral abundance).
								Volumes beyond 50% would be better represented as massive or near-total
								replacement of host rock rather than expressed as an intensity of alteration
								or sulphidation.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sub-sampling	•	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,	•	Drill core has not yet been sampled except by handheld XRF (described above).
techniques		half or all core taken.
and sample preparation	•	If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
	•	For all sample types, the nature, quality and
		appropriateness of the sample preparation
		technique.
	•	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
		sampling stages to maximise representivity of
		samples.
	•	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
		representative of the in situ material collected,
		including for instance results for field
		duplicate/second-half sampling.
	•	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
		size of the material being sampled.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Quality of	•	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the	•	Drill core has not yet been sampled except by handheld XRF (described above).
assay data and		assaying and laboratory procedures used and
laboratory		whether the technique is considered partial or
tests		total.
	•	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld
		XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in
		determining the analysis including instrument
		make and model, reading times, calibrations
		factors applied and their derivation, etc.
	•	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg
		standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
		checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy
		(ie lack of bias) and precision have been
		established.
Verification of	•	The verification of significant intersections by	•	Drill core has not yet been sampled except by handheld XRF (described above).
sampling and		either independent or alternative company
assaying		personnel.
	•	The use of twinned holes.
	•	Documentation of primary data, data entry
		procedures, data verification, data storage
		(physical and electronic) protocols.
	•	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of	•	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill	•	Drill collar locations (including RL) have been located using handheld GPS, MGA
data points		holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches,		94 Zone 53.
		mine workings and other locations used in Mineral	•	Historical drillhole locations have been extracted from the South Australian
		Resource estimation.		Resources Information Gateway (SARIG).
	•	Specification of the grid system used.	•	Precise locations of drillholes will be determined by an independent surveyor
	•	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.		at the completion of the overall drill programme.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Data spacing	•	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	•	To date, Coda has drilled only a single drillhole at Emmie Bluff Deeps.
and	•	Whether the data spacing and distribution is	•	Historical drillholes believed most relevant to the mineralising system include
distribution		sufficient to establish the degree of geological and		MGD 55, SAE 3 and SAE 4, located approximately 500m due east, 800m ESE
		grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral		and 920m NE respectively.
		Resource and Ore Reserve estimation	•	Coda does not believe that sufficient information exists to estimate a Mineral
		procedure(s) and classifications applied.		Resource and has not attempted to do so.
	•	Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of	•	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves	•	To date, Coda does not believe that it has sufficient data to comment on the
data in		unbiased sampling of possible structures and the		orientation of major structures or the overall trend of the mineralisation at
relation to geological structure		extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.		Emmie Bluff Deeps, nor the relationship between those features and the vertical orientation of its drill hole.
	•	If the relationship between the drilling orientation	•	It is anticipated that further drilling will assist in clarifying these questions and
		and the orientation of key mineralised structures		will allow Coda to comment on their materiality.
		is considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
		this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample	•	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	•	Drill core has not yet been sampled except by handheld XRF (described above).
security
Audits or	•	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling	•	No audits, umpire assays or reviews have yet been undertaken. Coda is seeking
reviews		techniques and data.		independent expert review of its drill core in the coming weeks.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Mineral	•	Type, reference name/number, location and	•	All drilling took place on EL 6265.
tenement and		ownership including agreements or material issues	•	EL 6265 is owned in a 70:30 unincorporated Joint Venture by Coda Minerals
land tenure status		with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title		Ltd and Terrace Mining Pty Ltd (a wholly owned subsidiary of Torrens Mining Limited).
		interests, historical sites, wilderness or national	•	The tenure is in good standing and is considered secure at the time of this
		park and environmental settings.		release. No other impediments are known at this time.
	•	The security of the tenure held at the time of
		reporting along with any known impediments to
		obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration	•	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by	•	Historical exploration of the Emmie Bluff prospect has been undertaken by
done by other		other parties.		(among others) Mt Isa Mines, Gunson Resources, Torrens Mining and
parties				Gindalbie Metals (Coda’s predecessor company).
			•	With the exception of data from Gindalbie Metals, all historical results used to
				guide Coda’s exploration has been obtained from the Geological Survey of
				South Australia via the South Australian Resources Information Gateway
				(SARIG).
Geology	•	Deposit type, geological setting and style of	•	The Elizabeth Creek project, of which Emmie Bluff Deeps is a part, sits in the
		mineralisation.		Stuart Shelf within the broader Olympic Copper Province in South Australia.
			•	Emmie Bluff Deeps mineralisation appears to be hosted in metasiltstones and
				sandstones of the palaeoproterozoic Wandearah Formation, and appears to
				be closely associated with intruded Hiltaba suite granites. Mineralisation
				consists of copper sulphides precipitated into these sedimentary units as part
				of a complex hydrothermal fluid dominated by iron in the form of haematite.
			•	Emmie Bluff Deeps mineralisation appears to closely resemble Iron Oxide
				Copper Gold mineralisation known from several deposits in the immediate
				area such as Olympic Dam and Carrapateena.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Drill hole	•	A summary of all information material to the	•	See Table 1 and Table 2 in body of announcement.
Information		understanding of the exploration results including
		a tabulation of the following information for all
		Material drill holes:
		`o` easting and northing of the drill hole collar
		`o` elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
		above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
		collar
		`o` dip and azimuth of the hole
		`o` down hole length and interception depth
		`o` hole length.
	•	If the exclusion of this information is justified on
		the basis that the information is not Material and
		this exclusion does not detract from the
		understanding of the report, the Competent
		Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data	•	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	•	Assays	reported for historical hole MGD 55 (80m @ 0.4% Cu have been
aggregation		averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum		reported as per the report submitted to the South Australian government by
methods		grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and		Gunson Resources Limited, the company which drilled the hole. This
		cut-off grades are usually Material and should be		aggregation includes considerable internal dilution and does not appear to
		stated.		have used a lower cut off.
	•	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short	•	Using a 0.5% Cu cutoff, the intersections made by MGD 55 would be rendered
		lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of		as follows using standard length weighted averaging:
		low grade results, the procedure used for such		`o`	1m from 939m at 0.69% Cu and 0.01g/t Au
		aggregation should be stated and some typical		`o`	1m from 946m at 0.56% Cu and 0.06g/t Au
		examples of such aggregations should be shown in		`o`	7m from 974m at 2.18% Cu and 0.49g/t Au
		detail.		`o`	1m from 988m at 0.64% Cu and 0.06g/t Au
	•	The assumptions used for any reporting of metal		`o`	1m from 997m at 0.63% Cu and 0.17g/t Au
		equivalent values should be clearly stated.		`o`	3m from 1005m at 2.03% Cu and 0.62g/t Au

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Relationship	•	These relationships are particularly important in	•	To date, Coda does not believe that it has sufficient data to comment on the
between		the reporting of Exploration Results.		orientation of major structures or the overall trend of the mineralisation at
mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	•	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	•	Emmie Bluff Deeps, nor the relationship between those features and the vertical orientation of its drill hole. It is anticipated that further drilling will assist in clarifying these questions and
	•	If it is not known and only the down hole lengths		will allow Coda to comment on their materiality.
		are reported, there should be a clear statement to
		this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not
		known’).
Diagrams	•	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and	•	See map, sections and tables in main body of announcement.
		tabulations of intercepts should be included for
		any significant discovery being reported These
		should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
		drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
		views.
Balanced	•	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration	•	Coda has provided a detailed description of the material encountered and
reporting		Results is not practicable, representative reporting		provided representative photographs of all altered rock identified by its field
		of both low and high grades and/or widths should		geologists as having potential to host mineralisation.
		be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of	•	Coda believes that this announcement represents an accurate and balanced
		Exploration Results.		reporting of the information it has to date. More information will be made
				available to the market as soon as practical upon its receipt by the company.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation			Commentary	Commentary
Other	•	Other exploration data, if meaningful and		material,	•	No other substantive exploration results are considered relevant to this
substantive		should be reported including (but not limited to):				release.
exploration data		geological observations; results; geochemical survey	geophysical survey results; bulk samples –		•	The Exploration Target referred to in diagrams in this announcement refers to the Emmie Bluff Exploration Target, which covers the Zambian-style
		size and method of treatment; metallurgical test				mineralisation overlying the IOCG style mineralisation encountered at Emmie
		results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical				Bluff Deeps. Information regarding this Exploration Target is extracted from
		and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or				the report entitled Confirmation of Exploration Target and Mineral Resource
		contaminating substances.				and Ore Reserve Statement, created on 23 October 2020 and is available to
						view at:
						https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20201026/pdf/44p31fmg5k2579.pdf.
					•	The company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that
						materially affects the information included in the original market
						announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters
						underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to
						apply and have not materially changed. The company confirms that the form
						and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not
						been materially modified from the original market announcement.

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation				Commentary	Commentary
Further work	•	The nature and scale of	planned further work (eg			•	Figure 6 in the body of the announcement represents Coda’s best current
		tests for lateral extensions or		depth extensions or			understanding of the area of greatest prospectivity at Emmie Bluff Deeps,
		large-scale step-out drilling).					being the area which exhibits an anomalous gravity response but lacks an
	•	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas			of possible		anomalous magnetic response in airborne geophysics.
		extensions, including	the	main	geological	•	Coda will drill wedged daughter holes from DD21EB0018 in the coming days
		interpretations and future drilling areas, provided					to attempt to replicate these results, and provide a geochemical gradient to
		this information is not commercially sensitive.					assist in vectoring towards additional mineralisation.
						•	Coda has approvals in place for an additional six drill pads within that area of
							high prospectivity, and is preparing to mobilise an additional diamond drill rig
							to test this area in a timely fashion.
						•	Full details of the planned drill programme have not been finalised as of the
							time of this announcement, but are expected to include at a minimum two
							additional drillholes, plus and as yet undetermined number of daughter holes
							to be drilled off those drillholes and DD21EB0018.

AI assistant

CODA MINERALS LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2021

64682_rns_2021-06-21_8ff43da9-5f76-437e-88aa-ffd421e6cd66.pdf

Thick Zone of IOCG Mineralisation Intersected at Emmie Bluff Deeps – Additional Information

Further Information:

Media:

Thick Zone of IOCG Mineralisation Intersected at Emmie Bluff

Deeps

Highlights

About Emmie Bluff Deeps

Appendix 1: Core Photos

Further Information:

Media:

About Coda Minerals

About Torrens Mining Limited

Forward Looking Statements

Competent Person’s Statement

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

More from CODA MINERALS LTD

CODA MINERALS LTD Capital/Financing Update 2021