AI assistant
CHORUS LIMITED — Investor Presentation 2020
Dec 16, 2020
64680_rns_2020-12-16_2eacaf11-20b2-428a-a64e-bcf1deaaa582.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [203 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
Chorus Limited Level 10, 1 Willis Street P O Box 632 Wellington New Zealand
Email: [email protected]
STOCK EXCHANGE ANNOUNCEMENT
17 December 2020
Chorus Price-Quality Expenditure Proposal Overview
Attached is a presentation overview of the Price-Quality Expenditure Proposal Chorus has submitted to the Commerce Commission for fibre fixed line access services.
An audio conference briefing to discuss the presentation will be held at 10am (NZ time) for investors and analysts.
To join the audio conference, please use one of the following numbers and the pin code: 58354011#
-
New Zealand: 0800 452 257
-
Australia: 1800 093 431
-
Other international: +612 8047 9393
Authorised by:
David Collins Chief Financial Officer
ENDS
For further information:
Brett Jackson Investor Relations Manager Phone: +64 4 896 4039 Mobile: +64 (27) 488 7808 Email: [email protected]
Steve Pettigrew Head of External Communications Mobile: +64 27 258 6257 Email: [email protected]
==> picture [960 x 472] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Price-Quality
Expenditure Proposal Overview
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [182 x 20] intentionally omitted <==
17 December 2020
Fibre has given New Zealand a gigabit headstart
Our expenditure proposal seeks to help NZ capitalise on this advantage
-
COVID-19 confirmed broadband is an essential service and underlined the importance of continued investment in new products like our multi-gigabit Hyperfibre services.
-
We expect the pace of change in consumer demand for bandwidth and data volume to accelerate, as fast fibre availability proliferates in the developed world and enables new applications to emerge.
-
Our proposal helps make New Zealand broadband better by leveraging the substantial investment we’ve already made with incremental expenditure that:
-
completes and builds on our successful UFB deployment
-
maximises consumer value now and into the future by controlling costs, promoting fibre and investing in new products and technologies
-
smoothly transitions through major changes in our operational focus, regulatory arrangements and service mix.
-
Investments in automating and streamlining our systems and processes will help retail service providers enhance their own service delivery, driving longer term reductions in our operational costs, and enabling much better service to New Zealand consumers.
-
Our in-market incentives for retailers and the education channels we support will promote greater awareness of fibre and maintain a level playing field for more diverse and effective retail competition. This benefits consumers through better retail offers and choice, and, as more consumers connect to fibre, secures the sustainability of the fibre network.
2
Overview of Price-Quality expenditure proposal
-
Chorus has submitted an operating and capital expenditure proposal to the Commerce Commission for the January 2022 to December 2024 regulatory period (RP1).
-
We’ve elected to release this overview of our proposal to assist investors in developing their understanding of our regulatory proposal before the financial reporting season in February.
-
The Commission is expected to release more detail of our proposals in Q3 for feedback from stakeholders.
-
Our proposal builds on our five-year business planning process with updates to reflect developments since the end of FY20:
-
it represents Board and management’s best view of the operation and plans for our business in a dynamic market.
-
this includes judgments as to allocation of costs, with final allocation principles to be decided by the Commission.
-
Regulatory Period 1 (RP1) is calendar years 2022-2024 rather than financial years.
-
The proposal has been subject to independent external review to determine whether our forecasts reflect good telecommunications industry practice and are consistent with the efficient costs of a prudent fibre operator.
3
Translating our regulatory proposal
Our proposal differs from our financial reporting requirements
-
the proposal covers the cost of fibre fixed line access services (FFLAS) subject to Price-Quality regulation. It excludes:
-
other fibre and copper related costs that will be incurred in these future years
-
FFLAS costs in LFC areas
-
regulatory cost categories are based on functional groupings and do not reflect our current financial reporting categories.
-
our regulatory forecasts are provided on a calendar year basis rather than financial years.
> other adjustments include:
- IFRS16 lease cashflows are included in the opex proposal – this is for comparison with pre-IFRS16 period - but they will not be included in the opex building block
==> picture [210 x 171] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
INCLUDES:
▪
fibre fixed line access
services only
▪
IFRS16 lease cashflows
as opex for
presentational purposes
▪
regulatory inflation
allowance
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [210 x 171] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
EXCLUDES:
▪
non-FFLAS services
costs (e.g. copper
services)
▪
FFLAS costs in LFC
areas
▪
capital contributions
▪
passthrough costs
----- End of picture text -----
-
capital contributions (e.g. developer contributions for new property developments) are netted off capex
-
passthrough costs (e.g. local body rates and regulatory levies) are excluded from opex
4
Cost allocation parameters
To be determined through the price-quality and information disclosure process
Pre-December 2011 assets
-
included to the extent assets are employed to provide fibre fixed line access services under the UFB initiative.
-
valued as per Chorus financial accounts.
-
UFB costs from 1 December shared costs are allocated using accounting-based allocation approach. ▪
-
2011 to 2022 (financial loss list of default allocators, with the Commission having the final decision: asset) number of customers, end-users, or premises (intact, connected or passed); number of ports; revenue; central office space; peak traffic; average traffic; used length of linear assets; power usage; and number of events.
-
▪ cost allocation calculations to be updated annually.
-
▪ cap limiting the allocation of re-used assets to that which cannot be avoided in providing UFB.
▪ cost allocations to be applied consistently across costs and between years.
▪ Fibre costs post 2022 cost allocators to remain consistent with initial RAB unless there is a justifiable reason to change.
5
Operating expenditure proposal
We model total FFLAS opex (nominal) of $625.5m for RP1
> This total:
-
includes IFRS 16 finance leases of ~$41m (nominal) for presentational and comparative purposes
-
excludes passthrough costs of ~$45m (nominal)
-
includes regulatory inflation
Re ulator Period 1 RP1 g y ( ) 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL $204.5m $207.5m $213.5m $625.5m
6
Operating expenditure categories
| Regulatory opex categories |
Sub-categories | Description | Financial reporting opex categories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer | ▪ Customer operations |
Demand driven activity (e.g. call centre and projects) |
Labour |
| ▪ Product, Sales & Marketing |
RSP relationships, activity to attract and retain end users |
Labour, Other | |
| Network | ▪ Maintenance |
Reactive, recoverable and preventative work | Network maintenance |
| ▪ Network operations |
Network operations centre and associated support |
Labour, IT, Other network costs | |
| ▪ Operating costs |
Leases, electricity, security and building costs | Electricity, Other network costs, Property maintenance |
|
| Support | ▪ Asset management |
Investment, programme, contract and property management |
Labour, Other |
| ▪ Corporate |
Corporate functional units, office expenses | Labour, Insurance, Consultants, Other | |
| ▪ Technology |
Non-capitalised business, customer and network IT |
Labour, IT, Other |
7
Opex regulatory template
| Opex categories |
Sub-categories | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer | ▪ Customer operations |
5.6 | 4.9 | 4.4 | |
| ▪ Product, Sales & Marketing |
25.0 | 25.3 | 25.8 | ~~>~~ ~~This~~ ▪ in |
|
| Network | ▪ Maintenance |
30.1 | 33.1 | 34.8 | ~~(n~~ ~~p~~ |
| ▪ Network operations |
20.1 | 20.8 | 21.7 | ▪ e |
|
| ▪ Operating costs |
18.2 | 20.0 | 22.2 | ~~(n~~ ~~▪~~ ~~i~~ |
|
| Support | ▪ Asset management |
23.7 | 22.8 | 23.0 | |
| ▪ Corporate |
61.2 | 59.7 | 60.0 | ||
| ▪ Technology |
20.6 | 20.9 | 21.6 | ||
| TOTAL ($m) | 204.5 | 207.5 | 213.5 | $625.5m |
~~> This~~ template:
-
includes IFRS 16 finance leases of ~$41m ~~(n~~ ominal) for presentational and comparative ~~pu~~ rposes
-
excludes passthrough costs of ~$45m ~~(n~~ ominal)
-
~~▪ in~~ cludes regulatory inflation
8
Opex: indicative FFLAS share of FY20 statutory opex
We estimate FFLAS opex was 55% of FY20 total opex
- FFLAS proportion of opex is expected to increase significantly as fibre uptake grows and the copper network is retired
FY20 – FFLAS (indicative):
-
includes passthrough costs of $11m
-
excludes IFRS 16 finance leases (treated as network fixed assets in FY20 statutory reporting)
| FY20 reported $m |
FY20 – FFLAS (indicative) $m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Labour | 80 | 73 |
| Network maintenance | 64 | 13 |
| Other network costs | 29 | 7 |
| IT | 47 | 29 |
| Rent, rates and property maintenance |
25 | 8 |
| Regulatory levies | 7 | 6 |
| Electricity | 15 | 4 |
| Provisioning | 5 | 2 |
| Consultants | 9 | 6 |
| Insurance | 3 | 2 |
| Other | 27 | 20 |
| Total | 311 | 170 |
9
Capital Expenditure proposal
We estimate total FFLAS capex of $1,029m (nominal) for RP1
-
capex is net of capital contributions of approximately $56 million
-
excludes FFLAS in LFC information disclosure areas
-
includes regulatory inflation
-
we’re proposing a wash-up mechanism for installation capex volumes
Re ulator Period 1 RP1 g y ( ) 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL $399.9m $333.2m $295.9m $1,029m
10
| Regulatory capex categories |
Sub-categories | Description | Financial reporting capex categories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extending the network (communal infrastructure) |
▪ Augmentation |
Infill within existing footprint or extension to new communities | Other fibre connections & growth |
| ▪ New property development |
New subdivisions, business parks | Other fibre connections & growth | |
| ▪ UFB communal |
UFB programme rollout | UFB communal | |
| Installations(connecting communal network to the ONT, including provisioning and incentive costs) |
▪ Complex |
Installations for specific business requirements | Fibre connections & layer 2 |
| ▪ Standard |
Most installation work, including backbone for multi-dwelling units and rights of way |
Fibre connections & layer 2, customer retention costs |
|
| IT & Support(IT and corporate capex) |
▪ Business IT |
Supporting business activities | Common - IT |
| ▪ Corporate |
Sundry investment and product development | Common - Other | |
| ▪ Network & customer |
Supporting network or customer activities | Common – IT, Fibre products & systems |
|
| Network capacity(ongoing investment in network electronics and systems to optimise for capacity growth and lifecycle needs) |
▪ Access |
Enabling connections to fibre | Fibre connections & layer 2 |
| ▪ Aggregation |
Link access networks to RSP points of interconnection | Fibre connections & layer 2 | |
| ▪ Transport |
Optical transport network to carry data medium/long distances | Fibre connections & layer 2, Other fibre connections & growth |
|
| 17 December 2020 Network sustain & enhance(investment in physical network assets) |
▪ Field sustain |
Assets outside of network sites (e.g. poles, fibre, terminators) | Other fibre connections & growth |
| ▪ Relocations |
Roading authority, undergrounding programmes and 3rd party requests |
Other fibre connections & growth | |
| ▪ Resilience |
Diversity, robustness or contingency investment to keep the network running |
Other fibre connections & growth | |
| ▪ Site sustain |
PRICE-QUALITY EXPENDITURE PROPOSAL Investment in network buildings, including power and cooling. |
Common – building & engineering services |
| Capex regulatory template > The regulatory categories generally reflect our FY20 results definition of sustaining vs non-sustaining capex ▪ FFLASnon-sustaining capex of $526m in RP1 includes some provisioning related customer retention costs that would be treated as sustaining and assumes <10k of complex, ~165k of standard and ~20k of backbone installations in RP1 ▪ FFLASsustaining capex of $503m in RP1 > The total RP1 proposed capex spend of$1,029m: ▪ is net of capital contributions ▪ excludes FFLAS in LFC information disclosure areas ▪ includes regulatory inflation NSC SC 12 |
Capex Categories |
Sub-categories | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extending the network |
▪Augmentation | 2.9 | 3.9 | 4.0 | ||
| ▪New property developments | 6.5 | 7.4 | 8.0 | |||
| ▪UFB communal | 40.9 | - | - | |||
| Installations | ▪Complex | 11.8 | 10.2 | 9.2 | ||
| ▪Standard | 176.9 | 136.9 | 107.6 | |||
| IT and support | ▪Business IT | 9.4 | 12.9 | 11.5 | ||
| ▪Corporate | 13.8 | 15.0 | 15.5 | |||
| ▪Network & Customer | 26.0 | 25.6 | 27.4 | |||
| Network capacity | ▪Access | 22.0 | 29.8 | 23.6 | ||
| ▪Aggregation | 12.7 | 21.1 | 16.8 | |||
| ▪Transport | 12.5 | 17.2 | 19.9 | |||
| Network sustain & enhance |
▪Field sustain | 20.9 | 21.7 | 22.7 | ||
| ▪Relocations | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.7 | |||
| ▪Resilience | 23.2 | 14.1 | 14.8 | |||
| ▪Site sustain | 15.8 | 12.8 | 10.2 | |||
| TOTAL ($m) | 399.9 | 333.2 | 295.9 |
Capex regulatory template
Appendix A: Copper Withdrawal Code finalised
The Commerce Commission has determined:
-
Chorus must provide end users with 6 months’ notice of copper withdrawal
-
notices can be sent to end users from 1 March 2021 onwards
-
three notices are required in advance of withdrawal: 6 months, 3 months and 20 working days
-
Chorus must provide notices direct to end users, rather than via their RSP
-
notices should include information on fibre services, not fibre marketing
-
copper cannot be withdrawn at the end of the notice period if the end user wishes to have fibre installed but: ▪ it is still in the process of being installed, or
-
it cannot be installed due to circumstances outside the end user’s control, and they have taken all reasonable steps to address these circumstances
-
fibre installations are free for aerial connections
-
the workability of the Code will be reviewed in late 2021
13
Appendix B: RAB implementation
==> picture [428 x 362] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Commerce Commission
14
Appendix C: Input methodologies key parameters
| Pre January 2022 period (financial loss asset) |
First regulatory period | |
|---|---|---|
| Risk free rate | 5-year rate, 1 month average, calculated as at middle of year, or mid each part year for 2012 and 2021 |
3-year rate, 3 months average, calculated as at 1 June 2021 |
| TAMRP | 7% until Oct 2020 then 7.5% | 7.5% |
| Debt risk premium | BBB, 7-year term, 1 month average | BBB, 5-year term, 5-year trailing average |
| Leverage | 29% | 29% |
| Debt issuance cost | 0.14% | 0.33% |
| Asset beta | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| WACC uplift | none – 50th percentile | none – 50th percentile |
| Asymmetric stranding risk | no allowance | 10 basis points |
| Crown financing | Financing rate reflecting Chorus’ actual senior debt/subordinated debt/equity mix |
Financing rate reflecting Chorus’ actual senior debt/subordinated debt/equity mix |
15
Disclaimer
This presentation:
-
Is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute investment advice or an offer of or invitation to purchase Chorus securities.
-
Includes forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees or predictions of future performance. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond Chorus’ control, and which may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in this presentation.
-
Includes statements relating to past performance which should not be regarded as reliable indicators of future performance.
-
Is current at the date of this presentation, unless otherwise stated. Except as required by law or the NZX Main Board and ASX listing rules, Chorus is not under any obligation to update this presentation, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
-
Should be read in conjunction with Chorus’ audited consolidated financial statements for the year to 30 June 2020 and NZX and ASX market releases.
-
Includes non-GAAP financial measures such as "EBITDA”. These measures do not have a standardised meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore may not be comparable to similar financial information presented by other entities. They should not be used in substitution for, or isolation of, Chorus' audited consolidated financial statements. We monitor EBITDA as a key performance indicator and we believe it assists investors in assessing the performance of the core operations of our business.
-
Has been prepared with due care and attention. However, Chorus and its directors and employees accept no liability for any errors or omissions.
-
Contains information from third parties Chorus believes reliable. However, no representations or warranties (express or implied) are made as to the accuracy or completeness of such information.
16