CHEVRON CORP — Annual Report 2002

Mar 27, 2002

10-K405 1 f80065e10-k405.htm FORM 10-K405 Form 10-K -CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION - 12/31/2001 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-368-2

ChevronTexaco Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 94-0890210 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 575 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105 --------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (415) 894-7700

NONE

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common stock par value $.75 per share	New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Preferred stock purchase rights	Pacific Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant

As of February 28, 2002 – $89,318,940,000

Number of Shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 28, 2002 – 1,067,200,937

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

(To The Extent Indicated Herein)

Notice of the 2002 Annual Meeting and 2002 Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the company’s 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (in Part III)

PAGEBREAK

TOC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 3.1
EXHIBIT 10.12
EXHIBIT 10.13
EXHIBIT 10.14
EXHIBIT 10.15
EXHIBIT 10.126
EXHIBIT 12.1
EXHIBIT 21.1
EXHIBIT 23.1
EXHIBIT 23.2
EXHIBIT 24.1
EXHIBIT 24.2
EXHIBIT 24.3
EXHIBIT 24.4
EXHIBIT 24.5
EXHIBIT 24.6
EXHIBIT 24.7
EXHIBIT 24.8
EXHIBIT 24.9
EXHIBIT 24.10
EXHIBIT 24.11
EXHIBIT 24.12
EXHIBIT 24.13
EXHIBIT 24.14
EXHIBIT 24.15
EXHIBIT 24.16
EXHIBIT 24.17
EXHIBIT 99.1
EXHIBIT 99.3

/TOC

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item
PART I
1.	Business	1
	(a) General Development of
Business	1
	(b) Description of Business and
Properties	2
	Capital and
Exploratory Expenditures	3
	Petroleum –
Exploration and Production	4
	Liquids
and Natural Gas Production	4
	Acreage	5
	Reserves
and Contract Obligations	6
	Development
Activities	7
	Exploration
Activities	9
	Review
of Ongoing Exploration and Production Activities
In Key
Areas	9
	Petroleum –
Natural Gas Liquids	14
	Petroleum –
Refining	14
	Petroleum –
Refined Products Marketing	16
	Petroleum –
Transportation	17
	Energy
Marketing and Services – Dynegy	18
	Chemicals	19
	Coal	19
	Other
Activities – Synthetic Crude Oil	19
	Power and
Gasification	20
	Research and
Technology	20
	Environmental
Protection	20
2.	Properties	21
3.	Legal Proceedings	21
4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders	22
	Executive Officers of the Registrant	22
PART II
5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity
and Related Stockholder Matters	23
6.	Selected Financial Data	24
7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk	24
8.	Financial Statements	24
8.	Supplementary Data – Quarterly
Results	24
	– Oil
and Gas Producing Activities	24
9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure	24
PART III
10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	24
11.	Executive Compensation	24
12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management	25
13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	25
PART IV
14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and
Reports on Form 8-K	25
	Schedule II – Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts	26

PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

link1 "PART I"

PART I link2 "Item 1. Business"

Item 1. Business

(a) General Development of Business

Summary Description of ChevronTexaco

ChevronTexaco Corporation 1 , a Delaware corporation, manages its investments in subsidiaries and affiliates, and provides administrative, financial and management support to, U.S. and foreign subsidiaries that engage in fully integrated petroleum operations, chemicals operations, coal mining, power and energy services. The company operates in the United States and approximately 180 other countries. Petroleum operations consist of exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas; refining crude oil into finished petroleum products; marketing crude oil, natural gas and the many products derived from petroleum; and transporting crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products by pipelines, marine vessels, motor equipment and rail car. Chemicals operations include the manufacture and marketing, by an affiliate, of commodity petrochemicals and plastics for industrial uses, and the manufacture and marketing, by a consolidated subsidiary, of fuel and lubricating oil additives.

In this report, exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas may be referred to as “E&P” or “upstream” activities. Refining, marketing and transportation may be referred to as “RM&T” or “downstream” activities. A list of the company’s major subsidiaries is presented on page E-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of December 31, 2001, ChevronTexaco had 55,763 employees (excluding 11,806 service station employees), down about 1,600 from year-end 2000. Included in this net change between periods was an addition of about 1,000 employees who had previously been classified as contractors in certain international operations. Approximately 32,000, or 47 percent, of the company’s employees, including service station employees, were employed in U.S. operations, of which approximately 4,500 were unionized.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS RELEVANT TO FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

FOR THE PURPOSE OF “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE

PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This annual report on Form 10-K of ChevronTexaco Corporation contains forward-looking statements relating to ChevronTexaco’s operations that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about the petroleum, chemicals and other energy-related industries. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Unless legally required, ChevronTexaco undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are crude oil and natural gas prices; refining margins and marketing margins; chemicals prices and competitive conditions affecting supply and demand for aromatics, olefins and additives products; actions of competitors; the competitiveness of alternate energy sources or product substitutes; technological developments; inability of the company’s joint-venture partners to fund their share of operations and development activities; potential failure to achieve expected production from existing and future oil and gas development projects; potential delays in the development, construction or start-up of planned projects; the successful integration of the former Chevron, Texaco and Caltex businesses; potential disruption or interruption of the company’s production or manufacturing facilities due to accidents or political events; potential liability for remedial actions under existing or future environmental regulations and litigation; significant investment or product changes under existing or future environmental regulations (including, particularly, regulations and litigation dealing with gasoline composition and characteristics); and potential liability resulting from pending or future litigation. In addition, such statements could be affected by general domestic and international economic and political conditions. Unpredictable or unknown factors not discussed herein also could have material adverse effects on forward-looking statements.

1 Incorporated in Delaware in 1926 as Standard Oil Company of California, the company adopted the name Chevron Corporation in 1984 and ChevronTexaco Corporation in 2001. As used in this report, the term “ChevronTexaco” and such terms as “the company,” “the corporation,” “our,” “we,” and “us” may refer to ChevronTexaco Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or to all of them taken as a whole, but unless it is stated otherwise, does not include “affiliates” of ChevronTexaco – i.e., those companies accounted for by the equity method (generally owned 50 percent or less), or investments accounted for by the cost method. All of these terms are used for convenience only, and are not intended as a precise description of any of the separate companies, each of which manages its own affairs.

—1— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Overview of Petroleum Industry

Petroleum industry operations and profitability are influenced by many factors, over some of which individual petroleum companies have little control. Governmental policies, particularly in the areas of taxation, energy and the environment, have a significant impact on petroleum activities, regulating where and how companies conduct their operations and formulate their products and, in some cases, limiting their profits directly. Prices for crude oil and natural gas, petroleum products and petrochemicals are determined by supply and demand for these commodities. The members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) are typically the world’s swing producers of crude oil, and their production levels are a major factor in determining worldwide supply. Demand for crude oil and its products and natural gas is largely driven by the conditions of local, national and worldwide economies, although weather patterns and taxation relative to other energy sources also play a significant part. Natural gas is generally produced and consumed on a country or regional basis.

Operating Environment

Refer to page FS-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion on the company’s current business environment and outlook.

Texaco Merger Transaction

On October 9, 2001, Texaco Inc. (Texaco) became a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation (Chevron) pursuant to a merger transaction, and Chevron changed its name to ChevronTexaco Corporation. The combination was accounted for as a pooling of interests, and each share of Texaco common stock was converted on a tax-free basis into the right to receive 0.77 shares of ChevronTexaco common stock. In the merger, ChevronTexaco issued approximately 425 million shares of common stock, representing about 40 percent of the outstanding ChevronTexaco common stock after the merger. Further discussion of the Texaco merger transaction, including merger-related expenses and synergy savings, is contained on pages FS-2 and FS-3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ChevronTexaco Strategic Direction

ChevronTexaco’s primary strategic objective is to achieve the highest total stockholder return in its peer group for the five-year period 2000 - 2004. British Petroleum, ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell are the primary competition where ChevronTexaco operates and comprise the company’s competitor peer group. The company had the highest total stockholder return in its peer group for the 2000 - 2001 period.

As a foundation for attaining this goal, the company has established four key priorities:

| • | Operational
excellence through safe, reliable,
efficient and environmentally sound operations; |
| --- | --- |
| • | Cost reduction by
lowering unit costs through innovation and technology; |
| • | Capital stewardship by investing in the best project opportunities and executing
them successfully (safer, faster, at lower cost); and |
| • | Profitable growth through leadership in developing new business opportunities in
both existing and new markets. |

Supporting these four priorities is a continued and improved focus on:

• Organizational Capability: The company has developed strategies to build capability systems to achieve top performance in the four priorities described above.

(b) Description of Business and Properties

The company’s largest business segments are exploration and production, and refining, marketing and transportation. Chemicals is also a significant operation, conducted mainly by the company’s affiliate – Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC (CPChem). The petroleum activities of the company are

—2— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

widely dispersed geographically. The company has petroleum operations in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Middle East, Central and Far East Asia, and Australia.

CPChem has operations in the United States, Belgium, China, South Korea, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Mexico. The company’s wholly owned Oronite additives business has operations in the United States, France, Netherlands, Singapore, Japan and Brazil.

An affiliate, Dynegy Inc. (Dynegy), is one of the leading marketers of energy products and services in the United States with customers in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom (U.K.) and other European countries. Its business activities include energy marketing; independent power generation; gathering, processing, selling and transportation of natural gas and natural gas liquids; and broadband trading.

Tabulations of segment sales and other operating revenues, earnings, income taxes and assets, by United States and International geographic areas, for the years 1999 to 2001, may be found in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page FS-28 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, similar comparative data for the company’s investments in and income from equity affiliates and property, plant and equipment are contained in Notes 14 and 15 on pages FS-31 to FS-33.

The company’s worldwide operations can be affected significantly by changing economic, tax, regulatory and political environments in the various countries in which it operates, including the United States. Environmental regulations and government policies concerning economic development, energy and taxation may have a significant effect on the company’s operations. Management evaluates the economic and political risk of initiating, maintaining or expanding operations in any geographical area. The company monitors political events worldwide and the possible threat these may pose to its activities – particularly the company’s oil and gas exploration and production operations – and the safety of the company’s employees.

The company attempts to avoid unnecessary involvement in partisan politics in the communities in which it operates, but participates in the political process to safeguard its assets and to ensure that the community benefits from its operations and remains receptive to its continued presence.

Capital and Exploratory Expenditures

A discussion of the company’s capital and exploratory expenditures is contained on page FS-10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

—3— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Petroleum – Exploration and Production

Liquids and Natural Gas Production

The following table summarizes the company’s and affiliates’ net production of crude oil and natural gas liquids, and natural gas for 2001 and 2000.

Net Production 1 Of Crude Oil And Natural Gas Liquids And Natural Gas

Natural Gas Liquids		Natural Gas
(Thousands of		(Millions of
Barrels per Day)		Cubic Feet per Day)
2001	2000	2001	2000
United States:
California	249	266	116	118
Gulf of Mexico	187	179	1,023	1,130
Texas	87	110	598	660
Wyoming	11	15	220	225
Other States	80	97	749	777
Total United States	614	667	2,706	2,910
Africa:
Angola	168	169	1	1
Nigeria	158	155	43	47
Republic of Congo	20	25	—	—
Democratic Republic of Congo	9	8	—	—
Asia-Pacific:
Indonesia	304	319	134	133
Partitioned Neutral Zone (PNZ) 2	144	139	10	11
Australia	45	48	235	225
Kazakhstan	17	17	67	83
Thailand	16	14	75	70
Papua New Guinea	7	11	—	—
Philippines	1	—	9	—
China	24	28	—	—
Other International:
United Kingdom (North Sea)	115	117	350	342
Canada	64	66	167	146
Argentina	57	51	56	51
Denmark	39	39	100	98
Norway	17	15	4	1
Venezuela	4	4	4	—
Colombia	—	1	203	194
Trinidad	—	8	100	65
Netherlands	—	—	1	1
Total International	1,209	1,234	1,559	1,468
Total Consolidated Operations	1,823	1,901	4,265	4,378
Equity in Affiliates	136	96	152	88
Total Including Affiliates	1,959	1,997	4,417	4,466

1 Net production excludes royalty interests owned by others.

2 Located between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the State of Kuwait.

—4— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

In 2001, ChevronTexaco conducted its worldwide exploration and production operations in the United States and approximately 25 other countries. Worldwide net crude oil and natural gas liquids production, including that of affiliates but excluding volumes produced under operating service agreements, decreased by about 2 percent from the 2000 levels. Net worldwide production of natural gas, including affiliates, fell 1 percent in 2001. Net liquids and natural gas production in the United States was down about 8 percent and 7 percent, respectively. The lower production reflected normal field declines and asset sales, partially offset by new and enhanced production in the deepwater and other areas of the Gulf of Mexico. International net liquids production, including affiliates, increased about 1 percent, while net natural gas production rose 10 percent from 2000. The increase in gas production occurred primarily in Trinidad, Canada and the company’s Tengizchevroil (TCO) affiliate in Kazakhstan.

While worldwide oil-equivalent production in 2001 was down less than 2 percent from 2000 levels, the company has targeted an oil-equivalent production growth rate over the next five years of 2.5 to 3 percent annually. However, 2002 production is expected to increase only about 1 percent because of OPEC-related constraints.

Acreage

At December 31, 2001, the company owned or had under lease or similar agreements undeveloped and developed oil and gas properties located throughout the world. The geographical distribution of the company’s acreage is shown in the next table.

Acreage 1 At December 31, 2001

(Thousands of Acres)

				and
Undeveloped 2		Developed 2		Undeveloped
Gross	Net	Gross	Net	Gross	Net
United States	10,457	7,462	8,508	4,152	18,965	11,614
Africa	25,556	8,751	411	116	25,967	8,867
Asia-Pacific	53,619	25,384	1,683	590	55,302	25,974
Other International	51,545	27,132	2,400	859	53,945	27,991
Total International	130,720	61,267	4,494	1,565	135,214	62,832
Total Consolidated Companies	141,177	68,729	13,002	5,717	154,179	74,446
Equity in Affiliates	927	464	57	28	984	492
Total Including Affiliates	142,104	69,193	13,059	5,745	155,163	74,938

| 1 | Gross acreage includes the total number of acres
in all tracts in which the company has an interest. Net acreage
is the sum of the company’s fractional interests in gross
acreage. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Developed acreage is spaced or assignable to
productive wells. Undeveloped acreage is acreage where wells
have not been drilled or completed to permit commercial
production, and may contain undeveloped proved reserves. |

Refer to Table IV on page FS-48 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for data about the company’s average sales price per unit of oil and gas produced, as well as the average production cost per

—5— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

unit for 2001, 2000 and 1999. The following table summarizes gross and net productive wells at year-end 2001 for the company and its affiliates.

Productive Oil And Gas Wells At December 31, 2001

Oil Wells		Gas Wells
Gross 2	Net 2	Gross 2	Net 2
United States	43,368	26,868	11,075	5,533
Africa	1,386	544	5	2
Asia-Pacific	8,396	7,537	269	141
Other International	2,248	1,400	382	171
Total International	12,030	9,481	656	314
Total Consolidated Companies	55,398	36,349	11,731	5,847
Equity in Affiliates	106	43	—	—
Total Including Affiliates	55,504	36,392	11,731	5,847
Multiple completion wells included above:	617	338	350	218

| 1 | Includes wells producing or capable of producing
and injection wells temporarily functioning as producing wells.
Wells that produce both oil and gas are classified as oil wells. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Gross wells include the total number of wells in
which the company has an interest. Net wells are the sum of the
company’s fractional interests in gross wells. |

Reserves and Contract Obligations

Table V on pages FS-48 and FS-49 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K sets forth the company’s net proved oil and gas reserves, by geographic area, as of December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999. During 2002, the company will file estimates of oil and gas reserves with the Department of Energy, Energy Information Agency. Those estimates are consistent with the reserve data reported on page FS-49 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In 2001, ChevronTexaco’s worldwide oil and equivalent-gas (BOE) barrels of net proved reserves additions exceeded production, with a replacement rate of 127 percent of net production, including sales and acquisitions. Excluding sales and acquisitions, the replacement rate was 112 percent of net production. In the United States, the reserves replacement rate was impacted by a significant downward revision in proved crude oil reserve quantities for the Midway Sunset Field in California’s San Joaquin Valley. The revision was the result of a determination of lower-than-projected oil recovery from the field’s steam

—6— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

injection process. The following table summarizes the company’s net additions to net proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas liquids and natural gas, compared with net production during 2001.

Reserves Replacement – 2001

Reserves			Production		BOE	Replacement %
					Reserves	Including
Liquids		Gas	Liquids	Gas	Replacement	Sales and
(mmbbls) 1		(bcf) 2	(mmbbls) 1	(bcf) 2	%	Acquisitions
United States	(89	)	452	224	988	5 %	(3	)%
Africa	168		1,116	129	16	268 %	268	%
Asia-Pacific	216		511	204	194	126 %	127	%
Other international 3	424		1,100	157	415	190 %	269	%
Total Worldwide	719		3,179	714	1,613	112 %	127	%

1	mmbbls = millions of barrels
2	bcf = billions of cubic feet
3	Includes equity in affiliates

The company sells crude oil and natural gas from its producing operations under a variety of contractual arrangements. Most contracts generally commit the company to sell quantities based on production from specified properties but certain gas sales contracts specify delivery of fixed and determinable quantities. Dynegy and ChevronTexaco have entered into long-term strategic alliances whereby Dynegy purchases substantially all natural gas and natural gas liquids produced by legacy Chevron in the United States, excluding Alaska, and supplies natural gas and natural gas liquids feedstocks to the company’s U.S. refineries and chemical plants. In March 2002, the company reached agreement with Dynegy to expand those contracts to include substantially all of legacy Texaco’s U.S. natural gas and natural gas liquids production. Outside the United States, the company is contractually committed to deliver approximately 110 billion cubic feet of natural gas through 2004 from both Australian and U.K. reserves, and approximately 335 billion cubic feet of natural gas post-2004 through 2020 from Australian reserves only. The company believes it can satisfy these contracts from quantities available from production of the company’s proved developed Australian and U.K. natural gas reserves. Substantially all of the contracts discussed above include variable-pricing terms.

Development Activities

Details of the company’s development expenditures and costs of proved property acquisitions for 2001, 2000 and 1999 are presented in Table I on page FS-45 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

—7— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the company’s net interest in productive and dry development wells completed in each of the past three years and the status of the company’s development wells drilling at December 31, 2001. A “development well” is a well drilled within the proved area of an oil or gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive. “Wells drilling” include wells temporarily suspended.

Development Well Activity

Wells
Drilling
At 12/31/01		2001		2000		1999
Gross 2	Net 2	Prod.	Dry	Prod.	Dry	Prod.	Dry
United States	373	137	866	21	919	14	857	14
Africa	33	13	22	—	39	—	19	—
Asia-Pacific	16	11	555	—	501	1	530	1
Other International	32	19	109	2	113	—	30	—
Total International	81	43	686	2	653	1	579	1
Total Consolidated Companies	454	180	1,552	23	1,572	15	1,436	15
Equity in Affiliates	37	18	17	—	33	—	1	—
Total Including Affiliates	491	198	1,569	23	1,605	15	1,437	15

| 1 | Indicates the number of wells completed during
the year regardless of when drilling was initiated. Completion
refers to the installation of permanent equipment for the
production of oil or gas or, in the case of a dry well, the
reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Gross wells include the total number of wells in
which the company has an interest. Net wells are the sum of the
company’s fractional interests in gross wells. |

—8— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Exploration Activities

The following table summarizes the company’s net interests in productive and dry exploratory wells completed in each of the last three years and the number of exploratory wells drilling at December 31, 2001.

Exploratory Well Activity

Wells
Drilling
At 12/31/01		2001		2000		1999
Gross 2	Net 2	Prod.	Dry	Prod.	Dry	Prod.	Dry
United States	42	28	101	32	69	30	90	40
Africa	4	1	8	2	2	4	2	2
Asia-Pacific	10	4	31	8	15	11	6	12
Other International	12	8	6	10	7	7	8	5
Total International	26	13	45	20	24	22	16	19
Total Consolidated Companies	68	41	146	52	93	52	106	59
Equity in Affiliates	1	—	14	—	—	—	—	—
Total Including Affiliates	69	41	160	52	93	52	106	59

| 1 | Indicates the number of wells completed during
the year regardless of when drilling was initiated. Completion
refers to the installation of permanent equipment for the
production of oil or gas or, in the case of a dry well, the
reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Gross wells include the total number of wells in
which the company has an interest. Net wells are the sum of the
company’s fractional interests in gross wells. |

“Exploratory wells” are wells drilled to find and produce oil or gas in unproved areas and include delineation wells, which are wells drilled to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of oil or gas in another reservoir or to extend a known reservoir beyond the proved area. “Wells drilling” include wells temporarily suspended. The company had $783 million of suspended exploratory wells included in properties, plant and equipment at year-end 2001, a decrease of $87 million from 2000. Decreases in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Angola were partially offset by increases in Nigeria, Brazil and China. The wells are suspended pending a final determination of the commercial potential of the related oil and gas fields. The ultimate disposition of these well costs is dependent on: (1) decisions on additional major capital expenditures, (2) the results of additional exploratory drilling that is underway or firmly planned, and in some cases, (3) securing final regulatory approvals for development.

Details of the company’s exploration expenditures and costs of unproved property acquisitions for 2001, 2000 and 1999 are presented in Table I on page FS-45 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Review of Ongoing Exploration and Production Activities in Key Areas

ChevronTexaco’s 2001 key upstream activities not discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations beginning on page FS-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are presented below. The comments include reference to “net production,” which excludes partner shares and royalty interests. “Total production” includes these components. In addition to the activities discussed, ChevronTexaco was active in other geographic areas, but these activities were less significant.

—9— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Consolidated Operations

A) United States

United States exploration and production activities are concentrated in nearly 850 fields located mainly in the Gulf of Mexico, Texas, New Mexico, the Rocky Mountains, California and Alaska.

Gulf of Mexico: In the Gulf of Mexico Shelf, the company maintained average net production rates of 142,000 barrels of oil, 1.237 billion cubic feet of gas, and 14,200 barrels of natural gas liquids per day.

In the Gulf of Mexico deepwater, ChevronTexaco has interests in three significant developments. The company operates and has a 57 percent interest in Genesis, which averaged net daily oil-equivalent production of 33,000 barrels during the year. Production began in July 2001 at a second development, Typhoon, in which the company has a 50 percent interest. Net daily production averaged nearly 18,000 barrels of oil-equivalent during the fourth quarter 2001. ChevronTexaco has a 50 percent interest in a third deepwater development, Petronius, which averaged net oil-equivalent production of 27,000 barrels per day during 2001. Exploration programs resulted in discoveries at Trident, Boris and Blind Faith, and confirmation of the 2000 Champlain discovery. The Trident appraisal is ongoing.

Mid-Continent/ Permian Basin: Onshore operations in the mid-continent United States are located in Utah, Texas, and Wyoming. Net natural gas production averaged 921 million cubic feet per day, while net production of crude oil and natural gas liquids averaged 31,000 barrels per day. Capital spending was focused on natural gas development and coalbed methane activity, located in northeast Utah. Permian Basin operations are located primarily in New Mexico. In 2001, net daily production averaged 117,500 barrels of crude oil and natural gas liquids and 275 million cubic feet of natural gas.

California: During 2001, average net daily production from the company’s San Joaquin Valley fields was 245,100 barrels of crude oil, 116 million cubic feet of natural gas and 3,900 barrels of natural gas liquids. Approximately 210,000 barrels per day of the crude oil production was heavy oil.

Offshore Florida: Development of the Destin Dome area of the Norphlet trend offshore Florida continues to be hampered by delays in obtaining regulatory approvals. A draft environmental impact statement was issued in August 1999 by the governing agencies indicating no significant environmental impacts from the project. In July 2000, ChevronTexaco and its partners in the Destin Dome development filed a lawsuit against the federal government to recover exploration expense and future lost profits following continuing delays in obtaining the necessary development permits. The company has filed a motion for summary judgement, which could decide the liability portion of the case and leave the amount of damages to be decided later.

B) Africa

Nigeria: ChevronTexaco’s principal subsidiary in Nigeria, Chevron Nigeria Limited (CNL), operates and holds a 40 percent interest in 11 concessions, predominantly in the swamp and near-offshore regions of the Niger Delta. CNL operates under a joint venture arrangement with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), which owns the remaining 60 percent interest. ChevronTexaco’s subsidiaries Chevron Oil Company Nigeria Limited (COCNL) and Texaco Overseas Nigeria Petroleum Company Unlimited (TOPCON) each hold a 20 percent interest in six concessions. TOPCON operates these concessions under a joint venture agreement with NNPC, which owns the remaining 60 percent interest.

In 2001, daily net production from the 33 CNL-operated fields averaged 143,000 barrels of oil and 2,700 barrels of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). During 2001, net production from the six TOPCON-operated fields averaged approximately 12,000 barrels of oil per day.

Phase 2 of the Escravos gas project was completed in the first quarter 2001. As a result, processing capacity at the plant increased to 285 million cubic feet per day. Preliminary design for Phase 3, which includes adding a second gas plant and expanding processing capacity to 680 million cubic feet per day,

—10— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

started in the third quarter of 2001 and is targeted for completion in 2005. ChevronTexaco holds a 40 percent working interest in the Escravos gas project.

Feasibility engineering and preliminary technical evaluations have been completed for a proposed gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant at Escravos. Front-end engineering and design started in March 2001. The proposed 33,000 barrels-per-day (12,000 barrels per day net) GTL project is the first to use the Sasol Chevron Global Joint Venture’s technology and operational expertise. Project start-up is expected to be in 2005. ChevronTexaco holds a 37.5 percent interest.

Angola: ChevronTexaco is the largest producer in Angola and the first to produce in the deepwater. Cabinda Gulf Oil Company Limited (CABGOC), a wholly owned subsidiary of ChevronTexaco, is operator of two concessions, Blocks 0 and 14, off the coast of Angola’s Cabinda enclave. Block 0, in which CABGOC has a 39 percent interest, is a 2,100-square-mile concession adjacent to the Cabinda coastline. Block 14, in which CABGOC has a 31 percent interest, is a 1,560-square-mile deepwater concession located west of Block 0.

In Block 0, the company operates in 3 areas – A, B and C. Area A, containing 15 fields currently producing, averaged net production of approximately 96,000 barrels of crude oil per day in 2001. Area B, with 3 fields producing, averaged net production of 32,500 barrels of crude oil per day. Area C averaged net production of 10,500 barrels of crude oil per day from 7 fields. Major development projects during 2001 included phase 1 of a waterflood project in Area A and a production and gas injection platform in the Area B North Nemba Field.

In Block 14, net production in 2001 from the Kuito Field, Angola’s first deepwater producing area, averaged approximately 19,000 barrels of crude oil per day. Development plans are under way for other fields within the Block.

Texaco Panama Angola Inc., a subsidiary of ChevronTexaco, is operator of and has a 20 percent interest in Block 2, a 160-square-mile concession adjacent to the northwestern part of Angola’s coast. Average net daily production from Block 2 was about 7,000 barrels of crude oil in 2001.

The company operates and has a 40 percent interest in offshore exploration Blocks, 9 and 22, which encompass approximately 2,000-square-miles each and are located south of Luanda, Angola’s capital.

Republic of Congo: ChevronTexaco has interests in two license areas, Haute Mer and Kitina/ Sounda, in offshore Congo and adjacent to the company’s concessions in Cabinda. ChevronTexaco has a 30 percent interest in the Haute Mer exploration permit and a 29 percent interest in the Kitina/ Sounda exploitation permits. The company’s interest in the deepwater Mer Profonde Sud license area was relinquished in 2001. Net production from ChevronTexaco’s concessions in the Republic of Congo averaged 20,000 barrels per day in 2001. Field development studies continue for the deepwater Moho and Bilondo discoveries in Haute Mer. Appraisal drilling was underway in early 2002.

Chad-Cameroon: ChevronTexaco is a 25 percent partner in a project that will develop landlocked oil fields in southern Chad and transport crude oil by pipeline to the coast of Cameroon for export to world markets. Project financing was secured during the second quarter 2001. At the end of 2001, the overall development project was about one-third complete. Pipeline construction began in the fourth quarter and drilling initiated in the first quarter 2002. First production is expected in 2004.

Equatorial Guinea: ChevronTexaco is a 65 percent partner and operator of the L Block offshore the Republic of Equatorial Guinea. The initial 3D seismic survey was completed in 2001 and is presently being analyzed.

C) Asia-Pacific

Indonesia: ChevronTexaco’s interests in Indonesia are managed by two wholly owned subsidiaries, PT Caltex Pacific Indonesia (CPI) and Amoseas Indonesia (AI). CPI accounts for approximately 50 percent of Indonesia’s total crude oil output and holds an interest in six production-sharing contracts. AI is a power generation company that operates the Darajat geothermal contract area in West Java and a

—11— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

cogeneration facility in support of CPI’s operation in North Duri. ChevronTexaco’s net share of production during 2001 averaged about 320,000 barrels of crude oil and condensate per day. CPI continues to implement enhanced oil recovery projects to extract more oil from its existing reservoirs. The Duri Field in the Rokan Block, under steamflood since 1985, is the largest steamflood project in the world. Currently 9 of 13 areas are under steam injection, with total production averaging about 260,000 barrels of oil per day during 2001. Area 10 is currently under development and will be placed on injection in the second quarter of 2002. CPI was awarded a new production-sharing contract for the Kisaran Block in 2001. The block is located in a gas prospective basin adjacent to the Rokan Block. A seismic review is planned for 2002.

Thailand: The company operates Block B8/32 in the Gulf of Thailand with a 52 percent interest. The company holds a 33 percent interest in adjacent exploration Blocks 7, 8 and 9, which are currently inactive pending resolution of border issues between Thailand and Cambodia. Block B8/32 produces oil and natural gas from three fields: Tantawan, Maliwan, and Benchamas. Initial production from the Maliwan Field occurred in October 2001. Net average daily production during 2001 from the company’s interests in Thailand was 75 million cubic feet of natural gas and 16,000 barrels of crude oil. In 2002, the Benchamas Field will go through a major processing upgrade to bring total field production levels up to 60,000 barrels of oil per day. Development of the Maliwan Field will continue with production from multiple platforms expected to begin in 2005. Nine of the 11 exploration wells drilled in 2001 were successful, extending the productive areas in Block B8/32 significantly. During 2002, an exploration program is planned to evaluate the remaining portions of the concession.

Australia: ChevronTexaco has a one-sixth interest in the North West Shelf (NWS) Project in offshore Western Australia. Average daily net production from the NWS Project during 2001 was 230 million cubic feet of natural gas and 16,000 barrels per day of condensate. Net crude oil production from the NWS Project averaged approximately 17,000 barrels per day and total LPG production averaged about 4,000 barrels per day. Approximately 68 percent of the natural gas was sold, primarily under long-term contracts, in the form of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to major utilities in Japan. The remaining gas was sold to the Western Australia domestic gas market. In 2001, ChevronTexaco approved the development of the Train 4 LNG expansion project, which is planned to increase LNG capacity by about 50 percent in 2004. The North West Shelf Venture LNG sellers have secured LNG Sales and Purchase Agreements and Letters of Intent with several Japanese customers, for a total volume equal to the capacity of the new LNG Train.

The company is operator and has a 57 percent interest in the undeveloped Gorgon area gas field offshore north-west Australia. ChevronTexaco is actively pursuing long-term gas sales from Gorgon to Australian industrial customers and in international LNG markets including China, Korea, and the west coast of North America.

Philippines: ChevronTexaco holds a 45 percent interest in the Malampaya gas field located about 50 miles offshore of the Palawan Island. The Malampaya gas-to-power project represents the first offshore production of natural gas in the Philippines. In September 2001 production commenced. The gas will be delivered to three power plants under Gas Sales and Purchase Agreements. Gas sales are projected to increase throughout 2002 as the power plants are commissioned and brought into commercial operation.

Middle East: ChevronTexaco holds a concession with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to produce onshore crude oil from the Partitioned Neutral Zone (PNZ). The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the State of Kuwait each own 50 percent of the hydrocarbon resources. ChevronTexaco is entitled to 50 percent of the gross field production, for which it pays a royalty and other taxes to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. During 2001, record production was achieved from the four producing fields – averaging 144,000 net barrels of crude oil per day. Planned development drilling, workover, and facilities enhancement programs during the next few years are expected to maintain production at similar levels. The company also has exploration agreements in Bahrain and Qatar.

Caspian Region: The company holds a 20 percent equity interest in the Karachaganak Field located in northwest Kazakhstan. Net daily production for 2001 was 14,300 barrels of condensate and 67 million cubic feet of gas from the existing production facilities. The current phase of the Karachaganak

—12— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

development includes the building of processing and liquid export facilities to be completed by the end of 2003.

D) Other International Areas

Europe: The company holds producing interests in 24 fields in Denmark, Norway and the United Kingdom. The combined net average daily production during 2001 was 171,000 barrels of crude oil and condensate and 454 million cubic feet of natural gas. The Alba Field in the United Kingdom North Sea, where ChevronTexaco is operator and holds a 21 percent equity interest, produced a net average of 17,000 net barrels of crude oil and 2.8 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. Development of the Alba Extreme South project, which is expected to begin production in late 2002, will maintain the Alba Field’s total production of 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day. ChevronTexaco holds an approximate 32 percent interest in the Britannia Field and shares operatorship. Net production averaged 9,600 barrels of crude oil and condensate per day and 208 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. The Captain Field net daily production averaged 49,000 barrels of crude oil during 2001. ChevronTexaco is operator and holds an 85 percent interest.

In Denmark, ChevronTexaco holds a 15 percent interest in the Danish Underground Consortium (DUC) currently producing crude oil and natural gas from 14 fields in the Danish North Sea. The DUC also holds nine exploration licenses with company interests ranging from 12 to 27 percent.

Canada: Total production from the Hibernia Field offshore Newfoundland, in which ChevronTexaco holds an interest of about 27 percent, averaged approximately 151,000 barrels of crude oil per day. Average net daily production from the company’s onshore Canadian operations was 52,000 barrels of oil equivalent during 2001.

Venezuela: The company operates the onshore Boscan Field, located near the city of Maracaibo, under an Operating Services Agreement and receives operating expense reimbursement and capital recovery, plus interest and an incentive fee. Development drilling continued in 2001. Boscan crude oil production, subject to Venezuela’s OPEC production restrictions, averaged 104,800 barrels per day during 2001. The company is also the operator and has a 27 percent interest in the LL-652 Field in Lake Maracaibo. Net production from LL-652 during 2001 averaged 4,900 barrels of oil per day, up from 4,000 barrels of oil per day in 2000. Field performance during 2001 indicated slower than anticipated re-pressurization of the reservoir by water injection and a reduction in the projected volumes of crude oil recoverable during the company’s remaining contract period of operations. As a result the company wrote down proved crude oil reserve quantities at LL-652 in 2001.

Argentina: ChevronTexaco operates in Argentina as Chevron San Jorge S.R.L. Chevron San Jorge holds more than 6.1 million exploration and production acres in the Neuquén and Austral basins of Argentina, with working interest shares ranging from 18 to 100 percent in operated license areas. In addition, the company holds a 14 percent interest in Oleoductos del Valle S.A. (Oldeval), a major oil export pipeline from the Neuquén producing area to the Atlantic coast. Daily net production during 2001 in the Neuquén and Austral areas averaged over 66,000 net barrels of oil-equivalent, an increase of over 11 percent from 2000 production levels.

Brazil: ChevronTexaco holds working interests ranging from 20 to 50 percent in nine deepwater blocks offshore Brazil totaling approximately 9.2 million acres. Deepwater exploration is concentrated in the Campos, Santos, and Espirito Santo basins. During 2001, the company drilled two successful appraisal wells in the Frade Field in Block BC-4 of the Campos Basin. ChevronTexaco’s interest in the Frade Block is approximately 43 percent. In the non-operated Block BS-4, where ChevronTexaco holds a 20 percent interest, two exploratory wells were drilled during 2001. One well resulted in a discovery.

Affiliate operations

Caspian Region: The Tengizchevroil (TCO) partnership, formed in 1993, includes the Tengiz and Korolev oil fields located in western Kazakhstan. In January 2001, the company acquired an additional

—13— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

5 percent stake in TCO, increasing its ownership interest to 50 percent. In 2001, total crude oil production from TCO increased for the eighth consecutive year, averaging 268,000 barrels of oil per day. Engineering for TCO’s next major expansion, expected to come on-line during 2005, is under way. Production at Korolev, located near Tengiz, began in November 2001. Crude oil from the field is very similar to crude produced from Tengiz and is routed to existing facilities at TCO through an extension of an existing gathering system.

Venezuela: ChevronTexaco has a 30 percent interest in the Hamaca integrated oil production and upgrading project located in Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt. Development drilling and major facility construction at Hamaca continued throughout 2001. Early production was established in October 2001, at a net rate of 9,000 barrels of crude oil per day. At the completion of the crude oil upgrading facilities in the first half of 2004, field production will increase to 190,000 barrels of crude oil per day and will be lighter, high-value crude.

Petroleum – Natural Gas Liquids

The company sells natural gas liquids from its producing operations under a variety of contractual arrangements. In the United States, the majority of sales are to the company’s affiliate, Dynegy. Dynegy and ChevronTexaco have entered into long-term strategic alliances whereby Dynegy purchases substantially all natural gas and natural gas liquids produced by legacy Chevron in the United States, excluding Alaska, and supplies natural gas and natural gas liquids feedstocks to the company’s U.S. refineries and chemical plants. In March 2002, the company reached agreement with Dynegy to expand those contracts to include substantially all of legacy Texaco’s U.S. natural gas and natural gas liquids production. Outside the United States, natural gas liquids sales take place in the company’s Canadian upstream operations, with lower sales levels in Africa, Australia and Europe.

Refer to “Selected Operating Data” on page FS-7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further information on the company’s natural gas liquids sales volumes.

Petroleum – Refining

Distillation operating capacity utilization in 2001, adjusted for sales and closures, averaged 88 percent in the United States (including asphalt plants) and 87 percent worldwide (including affiliates), compared with 88 percent in the United States and worldwide in the prior year. ChevronTexaco’s capacity utilization at its U.S. fuels refineries averaged 90 percent in 2001, compared with 91 percent in 2000. ChevronTexaco’s capacity utilization of its wholly-owned U.S. cracking and coking facilities, which are the primary facilities used to convert heavier products to gasoline and other light products, averaged 84 percent in 2001, up from 80 percent in the year earlier. The company processed imported and domestic crude oil in its U.S. refining operations. Imported crude oil accounted for 68 percent of ChevronTexaco’s U.S. refinery inputs in 2001.

Prior to October 2001, the company had interests in eight U.S. refineries with a combined capacity of about 1.3 million barrels per day through its investments in the Equilon and Motiva affiliates. These investments were placed in trust in October 2001, and sold, as required by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, in February 2002.

—14— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The daily refinery inputs over the last three years for the company and affiliate refineries are shown in the following table:

Petroleum Refineries: Locations, Capacities And Inputs

(Inputs and Capacities are in Thousands of Barrels Per Day)

	2001
			Refinery Inputs
		Operable
Locations	Number	Capacity	2001	2000	1999
Pascagoula	Mississippi	1	295	332	313	328
El Segundo	California	1	260	213	219	211
Richmond	California	1	225	229	203	207
El Paso 1	Texas	1	65	61	60	65
Honolulu	Hawaii	1	54	54	51	51
Salt Lake City	Utah	1	45	44	44	43
Other 2		2	96	50	53	50
Total Consolidated Companies –
United States		8	1,040	983	943	955
Equity in Affiliates 3	Various Locations	—	—	353	447	579
Total Including Affiliates – United
States		8	1,040	1,336	1,390	1,534
Pembroke	United Kingdom	1	210	202	215	195
Cape Town	South Africa	1	112	71	65	73
Batangas	Philippines	1	76	65	65	70
Colón 4	Panama	1	60	54	44	49
Burnaby, B.C.,	Canada	1	52	52	51	52
Escuintla	Guatemala	1	17	16	16	17
Total Consolidated Companies –
International		6	527	460	456	456
Equity in Affiliates 5	Various Locations	11	781	676	694	779
Total Including Affiliates –
International		17	1,308	1,136	1,150	1,235
Total Including Affiliates –
Worldwide		25	2,348	2,472	2,540	2,769

| 1 | Capacity and input amounts for El Paso
represent ChevronTexaco’s share. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Refineries in Perth Amboy, New Jersey and
Portland, Oregon, which are primarily asphalt plants. |
| 3 | Represents ChevronTexaco interests in Equilon and
Motiva refineries, which were placed in trust on October 9,
2001, as required by the US Federal Trade Commission, prior to
disposition in February 2002. |
| 4 | ChevronTexaco is negotiating with the Panamanian
government in order to cease refining operations and convert
these facilities to terminal operations in 2002. |
| 5 | 1999 inputs include Koa Oil Co. Ltd. refineries.
Interests sold in 1999. |

—15— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Petroleum – Refined Products Marketing

Product Sales: The company markets petroleum products throughout much of the world. The principal brands for identifying these products are “Chevron,” “Texaco” and “Caltex.”

The following table shows the company’s and its affiliates’ refined product sales volumes, excluding intercompany sales, over the past three years.

Refined Products Sales Volumes 1,2

(Thousands of Barrels Per Day)

United States
Gasolines	1,246	1,320	1,266
Jet Fuel	481	481	451
Gas Oils and Kerosene	419	419	410
Residual Fuel Oil	228	179	227
Other Petroleum Products 3	203	268	269
Total United States	2,577	2,667	2,623
International
Gasolines	410	455	481
Jet Fuel	136	156	145
Gas Oils and Kerosene	925	629	647
Residual Fuel Oil	475	573	567
Other Petroleum Products 3	549	708	781
Total International	2,495	2,521	2,621
Total Worldwide	5,072	5,188	5,244

1 Includes equity in affiliates

2 Includes Equilon and Motiva pre-merger

3 Principally naphtha, lubricants, asphalt and coke

In the United States, the company supplies, directly or through dealers and jobbers, more than 8,200 motor vehicle retail outlets, of which about 1,300 are company-owned or -leased stations. The company’s gasoline market area is concentrated in the southern, southwestern and western states. According to the Lundberg Share of Market Report, ChevronTexaco ranks among the top three gasoline marketers in 16 states. The company’s former affiliates, Equilon and Motiva, operated through approximately 22,000 retail outlets in the United States. ChevronTexaco sold its investments in Equilon and Motiva in February 2002.

In Canada – primarily British Columbia – the company’s branded products are sold in approximately 170 stations (mainly owned or leased).

ChevronTexaco operates a network of over 8,000 service stations and 650 convenience stores in more than 30 countries that cover the Asia-Pacific region, Southern and East Africa, and the Middle East. ChevronTexaco will continue to use the Caltex brand name in these areas.

In Europe, the company has marketing operations in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Scandinavian countries. In West Africa, the company operates in Cameroon, the

—16— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Canary Islands, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Togo and Benin. In these regions, the company mainly uses the Texaco brand name.

ChevronTexaco operates in approximately 40 countries across the Caribbean, Central America, and South America, with a significant presence in Brazil. In this region, the company uses the Texaco brand name.

In addition to the above activities, the company manages other marketing businesses globally. In global aviation fuel marketing, the company markets more than 400,000 barrels per day of aviation fuel in about 75 countries, representing a worldwide market share of about 12 percent. The company is the leading marketer of jet fuels in North America and ranks third in the Asia-Pacific region, Latin America, and the Caribbean. ChevronTexaco markets residual fuel oils and marine lubricants in over 100 countries, and motor lubricants in nearly 200 countries.

Petroleum – Transportation

Pipelines: ChevronTexaco owns and operates an extensive system of crude oil, refined products, chemicals, natural gas liquids and natural gas pipelines in the United States. The company also has direct or indirect interests in other U.S. and international pipelines. The company’s ownership interests in pipelines are summarized in the following table:

Pipeline Mileage At December 31, 2001

Owned	Owned 1	Total
United States:
Crude oil 2	1,876	458	2,334
Natural gas	1,403	1,872	3,275
Petroleum products	3,624	1,869	5,493
Total United States	6,903	4,199	11,102
International:
Crude oil 2	—	694	694
Natural gas	—	184	184
Petroleum products	4	547	551
Total International	4	1,425	1,429
Worldwide	6,907	5,624	12,531

| 1 | Reflects equity interest in pipelines, except for
those owned by Dynegy Inc. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Includes gathering lines related to the
transportation function. Excludes gathering lines related to the
U.S. and international production activities. |

The Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) was formed to build a crude oil export pipeline from the Tengiz Field to the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossiysk. The company has a 15 percent ownership interest in CPC. The first delivery of Tengizchevroil crude oil from the CPC terminal occurred in October 2001. When the construction project, including the pipeline, pump stations and terminal, is essentially complete, by the second quarter of 2002, the CPC system capacity will be 600,000 barrels of oil per day. Additional capacity will be possible with additional pump stations and tankage.

—17— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Tankers: ChevronTexaco’s controlled seagoing fleet at December 31, 2001, is summarized in the following table. All controlled tankers were utilized in 2001. In addition, at any given time, the company has 30 to 40 vessels under charter on a term or voyage basis.

Controlled Tankers At December 31, 2001

	Cargo Capacity		Cargo Capacity
Number	(Millions of Barrels)	Number	(Millions of Barrels)
Owned	3	0.8	8	10.4
Bareboat Charter	—	—	15	21.2
Time-Charter	—	—	4	2.2
Total	3	0.8	27	33.8

Federal law requires that cargo transported between U.S. ports be carried in ships built and registered in the United States, owned and operated by U.S. entities and manned by U.S. crews. At year-end 2001, the company’s U.S. flag fleet was engaged primarily in transporting crude oil from Alaska to refineries on the West Coast and Hawaii, refined products between the Gulf Coast and East Coast, and refined products from California refineries to terminals on the West Coast, Alaska and Hawaii.

The Federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires the scheduled phase-out, by year-end 2010, of all single hull tankers trading to U.S. ports or transferring cargo in waters within the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone. This has resulted in the utilization of more costly double-hull tankers. By the end of 2001, ChevronTexaco was operating a total of 16 double-hull tankers. ChevronTexaco expects to take delivery of two additional double-hull tankers in 2003, also to be operated under long-term bareboat charters. The company is a member of many oil-spill response cooperatives in areas in which it operates around the world.

At year-end 2001, two of the company’s controlled international flag vessels continued to be used as floating storage vessels in its upstream operations offshore Cabinda Province, Angola. The remaining international flag vessels were engaged primarily in transporting crude oil from the Middle East, Indonesia, Mexico and West Africa to ports in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Refined products also were transported by tanker worldwide.

Energy Marketing and Services – Dynegy

ChevronTexaco owns an approximate 26 percent equity share of Dynegy Inc. (Dynegy), which is one of the world’s leading energy merchants. Dynegy reported record net income of $648 million in 2001, a 29 percent increase compared with 2000. ChevronTexaco invested a total of $1.7 billion in Dynegy in 2001 and January 2002. Dynegy’s equity market value at December 31, 2001, was $8.6 billion. Through a global physical network of assets and marketing, logistics and risk management capabilities, Dynegy provides energy and communications solutions to customers in North America, the United Kingdom and continental Europe. Dynegy’s activity extends across the entire convergence value chain, from power generation, wholesale and direct commercial and industrial marketing and trading of power, natural gas, coal, emission allowances, weather derivatives, and broadband to transportation, gathering and processing of natural gas liquids.

Dynegy is one of the leading natural gas marketers in North America, with sales of more than 13 billion cubic feet per day, and a leading natural gas liquids marketer, with worldwide sales in excess of 557,000 barrels per day. Dynegy is also one of the largest processors of natural gas in North America, with production of more than 84,000 barrels of natural gas liquids per day. As of January 1, 2002, Dynegy

—18— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

operates or controls 19,100 gross megawatts of power generation capacity and plans to add over 1,400 gross megawatts in 2002.

Dynegy and ChevronTexaco formed a long-term strategic alliance in 1996 whereby Dynegy purchases essentially all natural gas and natural gas liquids produced or controlled by the legacy Chevron operations in the United States (excluding Alaska) and supplies natural gas and natural gas liquids feedstocks to most of ChevronTexaco’s U.S. refineries and chemical plants. In March 2002, the company reached agreement with Dynegy to expand those contracts to include substantially all of legacy Texaco’s undedicated U.S. natural gas and natural gas liquids production.

Chemicals

Chevron Phillips Chemical Company (CPChem) is a 50-50 joint venture with Phillips Petroleum Company formed in July 2000, when both companies combined most of their petrochemicals operations. CPChem owns or has joint venture interests in 34 manufacturing facilities and five research and technical centers in the United States, Puerto Rico, Belgium, China, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and South Korea.

In December 2001, commercial production of K-Resin resumed with the completion of Phase I of the rebuild at the Houston Chemical Complex, shut down since an explosion and fire that occurred in March 2000. Restoration of the remaining K-Resin capacity will be completed in 2002, bringing annual production capacity to 335 million pounds.

An olefins and polyolefins complex in Qatar is under construction and expected to start production in late 2002. Annual production capabilities at the complex include 1.1 billion pounds of ethylene, 1 billion pounds of polyethylene, and 100 million pounds of hexene-1. The complex is owned and will be operated by Qatar Chemical Company, Ltd. a joint venture between CPChem, with a 49 percent interest, and Qatar General Petroleum, which owns the remaining 51 percent.

A 50-50 joint venture with BP Solvay to build a new high-density polyethylene (HDPE) facility at a CPChem site in the Houston area is on track for start-up in late 2002. The jointly owned 700-million-pounds-per-year HDPE facility will be the largest of its kind in the world and will use CPChem proprietary manufacturing technology.

ChevronTexaco retained its “Oronite” fuel and lubricant additives business. Oronite is a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of performance additives for fuels and lubricating oils. The company owns and operates five manufacturing facilities in the United States, France, Singapore, Japan and Brazil and has equity interests in facilities in India and Mexico.

Coal

The company’s coal mining and marketing subsidiary, The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co. (P&M), owned and operated two surface mines and one underground mine at year-end 2001. P&M also owns an approximate 30 percent interest in Inter-American Coal Holding N.V., which has interests in mining operations in Venezuela.

Sales and other operating revenues in 2001 were $353 million, an increase of 19 percent from 2000. Sales of coal from P&M’s wholly owned mines and from its affiliates were 16.2 million tons, an increase of 17 percent from 2000. At year-end 2001, P&M controlled approximately 196 million tons of developed and undeveloped coal reserves, including significant reserves of environmentally desirable low-sulfur fuel.

Other Activities – Synthetic Crude Oil

In Canada, ChevronTexaco has a 20 percent interest in the Athabasca Oil Sands Project. The project is expected to begin bitumen production in late 2002 and reach 155,000 barrels of bitumen per day at peak production. The bitumen will be upgraded into high quality synthetic oil using hydroprocessing technology at a synthetic crude unit, which will start up by late 2002 or early 2003.

—19— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Power and Gasification

ChevronTexaco participates in its power and gasification business through ownership, equity investments with others and licensing of proprietary technology. The company’s electrical power business includes conventional power generation projects, as well as cogeneration facilities. Cogeneration produces thermal energy, such as steam, and electric power. ChevronTexaco has used steam produced in cogeneration in its upstream operations in onshore California and Indonesia. ChevronTexaco uses its proprietary gasification technology to convert a wide variety of hydrocarbon feedstocks into a clean synthesis gas. The synthetic gas can be used to generate electricity in low-emission power plants. ChevronTexaco licenses this technology, operates owned gasification facilities and invests in projects using the technology. With licenses and partners, the company has interests in over 70 gasification facilities operating or being developed worldwide.

Research and Technology

The company’s core hydrocarbon technology efforts support the upstream, downstream and power and gasification businesses, aimed at developing and applying these technologies to create increased value. These activities include heavy oil recovery and upgrading, deepwater exploration and production, shallow water production operations, gas-to-liquids processing, hydrocarbon gasification to power, and new and improved refinery processes.

Additionally, ChevronTexaco’s Technology Ventures Company focuses upon the identification, growth, and commercialization of emerging technologies for new energy applications. The range of business spans early-stage venture capital investing in emerging technologies to developing joint venture companies in new energy systems such as advanced batteries for distributed power and transportation systems, fuel cells and hydrogen fuel storage.

The company is building an information technology infrastructure encompassing computing, data management, security, and connectivity of partners, suppliers, and employees. The architecture, known as “Net Ready,” is designed to provide the foundation for the company to rapidly integrate advances in computing and network-based technology.

ChevronTexaco’s research and development expenses were $209 million, $211 million and $226 million for the years 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Because some of the investments the company makes in the areas described above are in new or unproven technologies and business processes, ultimate success is not always certain. Although not all initiatives may prove to be economically viable, the company’s overall investment in this area is not significant to the company’s consolidated financial position.

Environmental Protection

Virtually all aspects of the company’s businesses are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These regulatory requirements continue to change and increase in both number and complexity, and govern not only the manner in which the company conducts its operations, but also the products it sells. ChevronTexaco expects more environmental-related regulations in the countries where it has operations. Most of the costs of complying with the myriad laws and regulations pertaining to its operations are embedded in the normal costs of conducting its business.

In 2001, the company’s U.S. capitalized environmental expenditures were $220 million, representing approximately 4 percent of the company’s total consolidated U.S. capital and exploratory expenditures. These environmental expenditures include capital outlays to retrofit existing facilities, as well as those associated with new facilities. The expenditures are predominantly in the petroleum segment and relate mostly to air and water quality projects and activities at the company’s refineries, oil and gas producing facilities and marketing facilities. For 2002, the company estimates U.S. capital expenditures for environmental control facilities will be $370 million. The future annual capital costs of fulfilling this

—20— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

commitment are uncertain and will be governed by several factors, including future changes to regulatory requirements.

Further information on environmental matters and their impact on ChevronTexaco, and the company’s 2001 environmental expenditures, remediation provisions and year-end environmental reserves are contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages FS-10 and FS-11 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. link2 "Item 2. Properties"

Item 2. Properties

The location and character of the company’s oil, natural gas and coal properties and its refining, marketing, transportation and chemicals facilities are described above under Item 1. Business. Information required by the Securities Exchange Act Industry Guide No. 2 (“Disclosure of Oil and Gas Operations”) is also contained in Item 1 and in Tables I through VII on pages FS-45 to FS-51 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Note 15, “Properties, Plant and Equipment,” to the company’s financial statements is on page FS-33 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. link2 "Item 3. Legal Proceedings"

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

A. Texaco Exploration and Production Inc. – Aneth Producing Unit and Gas Plant – Clean Air Act Enforcement Action

Texaco Exploration and Production Inc. (“TEPI”) has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $243,725 to settle an enforcement action brought by the United States Environmental Protection Agency involving alleged Clean Air Act violations at TEPI’s Aneth Producing Unit and Gas Plant, located on the Navajo Nation in Utah. In addition, TEPI has agreed to a supplemental environmental project wherein it will provide a local fire department in Montezuma Creek, Utah with $51,275 in emergency response equipment and hazardous materials training. The alleged violations include: 1) a claim that TEPI’s Aneth Producing Unit failed to provide notice to emergency response authorities of releases of sulfur dioxide in December 1997 as required by section 304 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act; and 2) non-compliance with Clean Air Act regulations at the Aneth Gas Plant near Montezuma Creek, Utah, resulting from a 1991 renovation of the facility and the cleanup of asbestos-containing materials following a 1997 explosion.

B. Texaco Exploration and Production Inc. – Aneth Producing Unit – Clean Water Act Enforcement Action

Texaco Exploration and Production Inc. (“TEPI”) has agreed to a civil penalty of $370,000 to settle an enforcement action brought by the United States Environmental Protection Agency involving alleged Clean Water Act violations at TEPI’s Aneth Producing Unit located on the Navajo Nation in Utah. In addition to the civil penalty, TEPI agreed to fund a $479,000 supplemental environmental project. The alleged violations include: 1) a claim that TEPI did not report releases of pollutants as required by law and 2) unlawful releases of pollutants into Waters of the United States.

C. Texaco Chemical Company – Clean Water Act Enforcement Action

Texaco Chemical Company (“TCC”) has agreed to pay a $300,000 civil penalty to settle an administrative enforcement action initiated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. This enforcement action, which involved two separate proceedings initiated in 1992 and subsequently consolidated, alleged violations of the Texas State Implementation Plan; hazardous waste laws; Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) regulations; and release notification and requirements at the TCC facility located in Port Neches, Texas. The stock of TCC was sold to Huntsman in 1994 and ChevronTexaco has no current relationship with the Port Neches facility.

—21— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

link2 "Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders"

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The following matters were submitted to a vote of Chevron Corporation stockholders at a special meeting on October 9, 2001.

Voters approved the issuance of common stock to Texaco Inc. stockholders at a ratio of 0.77 shares of ChevronTexaco common stock for each share of Texaco common stock, by a vote of 442,294,614 votes (98.9 percent) for and 4,754,183 (1.1 percent) against. There were 4,926,109 abstentions.

Voters approved the amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of Chevron Corporation to “ChevronTexaco Corporation,” by a vote of 438,925,583 votes (97.9 percent) for and 9,456,781 (2.1 percent) against. There were 3,594,154 abstentions.

Executive Officers of the Registrant at March 1, 2002

Name and Age		Executive Office Held	Major Area of Responsibility
D. J. O’Reilly	55	Chairman of the Board since 2000 Director since 1998 Vice-Chairman from 1998 to 2000 President of Chevron Products Company from 1994 to 1998 Executive Committee Member since 1994	Chief Executive Officer
P. J. Robertson	55	Vice-Chairman of the Board since 2002 Vice-President since 1994 President of Chevron Overseas Petroleum Inc. from 2000 to 2002 Executive Committee Member since 1997	Office of the Chairman Worldwide Exploration and Production Activities
G. F. Tilton	53	Vice-Chairman of the Board since 2001 Director since 2001 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Texaco Inc., 2001 President of Global Business Unit, Texaco Inc. from 1997 to 2001 Executive Committee Member since 2001	Office of the Chairman
D. W. Callahan	59	Executive Vice-President since 2000 Vice-President since 1999 President of Chevron Chemical Company from 1999 to 2000 Executive Committee Member since 1999	Chemicals, Coal, Human Resources, Technology
H. D. Hinman	61	Vice-President and General Counsel since 1993 Executive Committee Member since 1993	Law
G. L. Kirkland	51	President of ChevronTexaco Overseas Petroleum Inc. since 2002 Vice-President since 2002 President of Chevron U.S.A. Production Company from 2000 to 2002 Executive Committee Member from 2000 to 2001	Overseas Exploration and Production
J. S. Watson	45	Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer since 2000 Vice-President since 1998 Executive Committee Member since 2000	Finance

—22— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant at March 1, 2002 — (continued)

Name and Age		Executive Office Held	Major Area of Responsibility
R. I. Wilcox	56	President, North America Exploration and Production since 2002 Vice President since 2002	North American Exploration and Production
P. A. Woertz	48	Executive Vice President since 2001 Vice-President since 1998 President of Chevron Products Company From 1998 to 2001 Executive Committee Member since 1998	Worldwide Refining, Marketing and Transportation Activities

The Executive Officers of the Corporation consist of the Chairman of the Board, the Vice-Chairman of the Board, and such other officers of the Corporation who are either Directors or members of the Executive Committee, or who are chief executive officers of principal business units. Except as noted below, all of the Corporation’s Executive Officers have held one or more of such positions for more than five years.

| D. W. Callahan | - Senior Vice President, Chevron Chemical
Company – 1991 - President, Chevron Chemical Company – 1999 |
| --- | --- |
| G. L. Kirkland | - General Manager, Asset Management, Chevron
Nigeria Limited – 1996 - Chairman and Managing Director, Chevron Nigeria
Limited – 1996 - President, Chevron USA Production Company – 2000 |
| P. J. Robertson | - Executive Vice-President of
Chevron U.S.A. Production Company – 1996 - Vice-President, Chevron Corporation and President of
Chevron U.S.A. Production
Company – 1997 - President of Chevron Overseas Petroleum Inc. since 2000 |
| G. F. Tilton | - President of Texaco USA –
1995 - President of Global Businesses, Texaco Inc. –
1997 |
| J. S. Watson | - President, Chevron Canada
Limited – 1996 - Vice-President, Strategic Planning, Chevron
Corporation – 1998 - Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, Chevron
Corporation – 2000 |
| R. I. Wilcox | - Vice President and General Manager, Marine
Transportation, Chevron Shipping
Company – 1996 - General Manager, Asset Management, Chevron Nigeria
Limited – 1999 - Chairman and Managing Director, Chevron Nigeria
Limited – 2000 - Corporate Vice President and President, North America
Exploration and Production – 2002 |
| P. A. Woertz | - President, Chevron International Oil
Company – 1996 - Vice President, Logistics and Trading, Chevron Products
Company – 1996 - President, Chevron Products Company – 1998 |

link1 "PART II"

PART II link2 "Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters"

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

The information on ChevronTexaco’s common stock market prices, dividends, principal exchanges on which the stock is traded and number of stockholders of record is contained in the Quarterly Results and Stock Market Data tabulations, on page FS-43 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

—23— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

link2 "Item 6. Selected Financial Data"

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data for years 1997 through 2001 are presented on page FS-44 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. link2 "Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data is presented on page FS-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. link2 "Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk"

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The company’s discussion of interest rate, foreign currency and commodity price market risk is contained on pages FS-9 and FS-10. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – “Financial Instruments” and Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements – “Financial and Derivative Instruments” beginning on page FS-27. link2 "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data is presented on page FS-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. link2 "Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure"

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None. link1 "PART III"

PART III link2 "Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant"

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information on Directors appearing under the heading “Nominees For Directors” in the Notice of the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2002 Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the company’s 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Executive Officers of the Registrant on pages 22 and 23 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information about Executive Officers of the company.

The information contained under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Notice of the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2002 Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the company’s 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ChevronTexaco believes all filing requirements were complied with during 2001. link2 "Item 11. Executive Compensation"

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information appearing under the heading “Executive Compensation,” including the subheadings “Summary Compensation Table,” “Long-Term Incentive Plan – 2001 Performance Units Awards Table,” “Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year Table,” “G. F. Tilton’s Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year Table,” “Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-end Option Values Table,” “Pension Plan Table,” “Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements” and “Summary of Glenn F. Tilton’s Employment Agreement” and in the Notice of the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2002 Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the company’s 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

—24— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

link2 "Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management"

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The information appearing under the heading “Directors’ and Executive Officers’ Stock Ownership” in the Notice of the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2002 Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the company’s 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. link2 "Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions"

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information appearing under the heading “Transactions with Directors and Officers” in the Notice of the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and 2002 Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Rule 14a-6(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the company’s 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. link1 "PART IV"

PART IV link2 "Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K"

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements:

| Report of Independent Accountants –
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | FS-15 |
| --- | --- |
| Report of Independent Public
Accountants – Arthur Andersen LLP | FS-15 |
| Consolidated Statement of Income for the three
years ended December 31, 2001 | FS-16 |
| Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the three years ended December 31, 2001 | FS-17 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31,
2001 and 2000 | FS-18 |
| Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the
three years ended December 31, 2001 | FS-19 |
| Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’
Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2001 | FS-20 to FS-21 |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | FS-22 to FS-42 |

(2) Financial Statement Schedules:

We have included on page 26 of this Annual report on Form 10-K, Financial Statement Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

(3) Exhibits:

The Exhibit Index on pages E-1 and E-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K lists the exhibits that are filed as part of this report.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

(1) A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed by the company on November 19, 2001. In this report, ChevronTexaco filed the following financial information:

•	Review of Operations 1998-2000
•	Audited Supplemental Combined Financial
Statements 1998-2000
•	Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing
Activities 1998-2000
•	Financial Summary 1996-2000
•	Audited Schedule II – Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts

—25— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS ($ MILLIONS)

	Year ended December 31, — 2001	2000		1999
Employee Termination Benefits:
Balance at January 1	$ 1	$	130	$	156
Additions charged to expense	763		15		291
Payments	(105	)	(144	)	(317	)
Balance at December 31*	$ 659	$	1	$	130
*$275 is reported as “Deferred Credits and
Other Noncurrent Obligations” on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet
Other Merger-related Expenses:
Balance at January 1	$ —	$	—	$	—
Additions charged to expense	128		—		—
Payments	(1	)	—		—
Balance at December 31	$ 127	$	—	$	—
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
Balance at January 1	$ 136	$	113	$	90
Additions charged to expense	116		74		97
Bad debt write-offs	(69	)	(51	)	(74	)
Balance at December 31	$ 183	$	136	$	113
Deferred Income Tax Valuation
Allowance:*
Balance at January 1	$ 1,574	$	1,588	$	1,295
Additions charged to deferred income tax expense	258		326		381
Deductions credited to deferred income tax expense	(401	)	(340	)	(88	)
Balance at December 31	$ 1,431	$	1,574	$	1,588
*See also Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements on page FS-34
Inventory Valuation Allowance:
Balance at January 1	$ 4	$	—	$	170
Additions	—		4		—
Deductions	(4	)	—		(170	)
Balance at December 31	$ —	$	4	$	—

—26— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

link1 "SIGNATURES"

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 27th day of March 2002.

ChevronTexaco Corporation

By DAVID J. O’REILLY*

David J. O’Reilly, Chairman of the Board

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 27th day of March 2002.

| Principal Executive Officers (And
Directors) | Directors |
| --- | --- |
| DAVID J. O’REILLY David J. O’Reilly, Chairman of the
Board | SAMUEL H. ARMACOST Samuel H. Armacost |
| PETER J. ROBERTSON Peter J. Robertson, Vice-Chairman of the
Board | ROBERT J. EATON Robert J. Eaton |
| GLENN F. TILTON Glenn F. Tilton, Vice-Chairman of the Board | SAM GINN Sam Ginn |
| | CARLA A. HILLS Carla A. Hills |
| Principal Financial Officer | FRANKLYN G. JENIFER Franklyn G. Jenifer |
| JOHN S. WATSON John S. Watson, Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer | J. BENNETT JOHNSTON J. Bennett Johnston |
| Principal Accounting Officer | SAM NUNN Sam Nunn |
| STEPHEN J. CROWE Stephen J. Crowe, Vice-President and Comptroller | CHARLES R. SHOEMATE Charles R. Shoemate |
| | FRANK A. SHRONTZ Frank A. Shrontz |
| By: /s/ LYDIA I. BEEBE Lydia I. Beebe, Attorney-in-Fact | THOMAS A. VANDERSLICE Thomas A. Vanderslice |
| | CARL WARE Carl Ware |
| | JOHN A. YOUNG John A. Young |

—27— PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

INDEX TO MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Management’s Discussion and Analysis	FS-2 to FS-14
Report of Independent Accountants	FS-15
Report of Independent Public Accountants	FS-15
Consolidated Statement of Income	FS-16
Report of Management	FS-16
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income	FS-17
Consolidated Balance Sheet	FS-18
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows	FS-19
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’
Equity	FS-20 to FS-21
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	FS-22 to FS-42
Quarterly Results and Stock Market Data	FS-43
Five-Year Financial Summary	FS-44
Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing
Activities	FS-44 to FS-51

FS-1 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

TEXACO MERGER TRANSACTION On October 9, 2001, Texaco Inc. (Texaco) became a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation (Chevron) pursuant to a merger transaction, and Chevron changed its name to ChevronTexaco Corporation. The combination was accounted for as a pooling of interests, and each share of Texaco common stock was converted on a tax-free basis into the right to receive 0.77 shares of ChevronTexaco common stock. In the merger, ChevronTexaco issued approximately 425 million shares of common stock, representing about 40 percent of the outstanding ChevronTexaco common stock after the merger.

In accordance with pooling-of-interests accounting, the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the merger, with all periods presented as if Chevron and Texaco had always been combined.

As a result of the merger, the accounts of certain operations that were jointly owned by the combining companies are consolidated in the accompanying financial statements. These operations are primarily those of the Caltex Group of Companies, which was previously owned 50 percent each by Chevron and Texaco.

KEY FINANCIAL RESULTS

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts — Net Income	2001 — $ 3,288	$	7,727	$	3,247
Special Items and Merger Effects
Included in Net Income	(3,522	)	(378	)	(191	)
Earnings Excluding Special Items and
Merger Effects	$ 6,810	$	8,105	$	3,438
Per Share:
Net Income – Basic	$ 3.10	$	7.23	$	3.01
– Diluted	$ 3.09	$	7.21	$	3.00
Earnings Excluding Special Items and Merger Effects – Basic	$ 6.42	$	7.58	$	3.19
– Diluted	$ 6.41	$	7.57	$	3.18
Dividends*	$ 2.65	$	2.60	$	2.48
Sales and Other Operating Revenues	$ 104,409	$	117,095	$	84,004
Return on:
Average Capital Employed	7.8	%	17.3	%	8.5	%
Average Stockholders’ Equity	9.8	%	24.5	%	11.1	%

• Chevron divided pre-merger.

ChevronTexaco’s net income of $3.288 billion was down significantly from 2000 but was slightly higher than 1999. Net income for 2001 included net charges of $1.743 billion for special items and $1.779 billion for merger effects, for a combined total of $3.522 billion. Special items included asset write-downs of $1.709 billion, primarily for exploration and production (upstream) properties as a result of downward revisions in estimated proved crude oil reserves. Merger effects represented merger-related expenses of $1.136 billion and net losses on merger-related asset dispositions of $643 million. In 2000 and 1999, net special charges were $378 million and $191 million, respectively.

Net income and special items for the individual business segments are discussed in the Results of Operations section beginning on page FS-4.

NET INCOME BY MAJOR OPERATING AREA 1

Millions of dollars	2001
Exploration and Production
United States	$ 1,779	$	3,453	$	1,133
International	2,533		3,702		1,450
Total Exploration and Production	4,312		7,155		2,583
Refining, Marketing and Transportation
United States	1,254		721		551
International	560		414		546
Total Refining, Marketing
and Transportation	1,814		1,135		1,097
Chemicals	(128	)	40		109
All Other	(2,710	)	(603	)	(542	)
Net Income 2	$ 3,288	$	7,727	$	3,247
1 1999 and 2000 conformed to the 2001 presentation
2 Includes Foreign Currency Gains (Losses):	$ 191	$	182	$	(15	)

EARNINGS BY MAJOR OPERATING AREA, EXCLUDING SPECIAL ITEMS AND MERGER EFFECTS 1

Millions of dollars	2001
Exploration and Production
United States	$ 2,890	$	3,736	$	1,390
International	2,905		3,622		1,520
Total Exploration and Production	5,795		7,358		2,910
Refining, Marketing and Transportation
United States	1,332		974		638
International	598		526		615
Total Refining, Marketing and
Transportation	1,930		1,500		1,253
Chemicals	(32	)	130		174
All Other	(883	)	(883	)	(899	)
Earnings Excluding Special Items and
Merger Effects 2	6,810		8,105		3,438
Special Items and Merger Effects 2	(3,522	)	(378	)	(191	)
Net Income 2	$ 3,288	$	7,727	$	3,247
1 1999 and 2000 conformed to the 2001 presentation
2 Includes Foreign Currency Gains (Losses):	$ 191	$	182	$	(15	)

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUTLOOK ChevronTexaco’s overall operating earnings depend largely on the profitability of its upstream – exploration and production – and downstream – refining, marketing and transportation – businesses.

Upstream operating earnings align most closely with industry price levels for crude oil and natural gas. The decline in the company’s upstream operating earnings during 2001 tracked the downward slide in prices for these commodities. The price trend for crude oil was largely caused by reduced demand in weakened economies worldwide and the relative oversupply by OPEC and certain other oil-producing countries.

FS-2 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The average spot price during 2001 for West Texas Intermediate (WTI), a benchmark crude oil, was about $26 per barrel – down from an average of about $30 in 2000 – and ended the year under $20. A similar trend existed for certain natural gas prices, which are more sensitive to regional supply-demand balances. In the United States, the company’s average natural gas sales realization started 2001 at about $10.00 per thousand cubic feet. By the end of the year, the average realization had dropped below $3.00. Into early 2002, the WTI crude oil price moved above $20 per barrel, but the company’s U.S. average natural gas realization remained below $3.00 per thousand cubic feet. Earnings during 2001 were also dampened by slightly lower oil-equivalent production – down less than 2 percent from 2000 levels. However, the company anticipates an oil-equivalent production growth rate over the next five years of 2.5 to 3 percent annually, although 2002 production is expected to increase only about 1 percent because of OPEC-related constraints.

Downstream operating earnings are most closely tied to refining and marketing margins, which can vary among the geographic areas in which the company operates. Although world-wide demand for refined products weakened overall during 2001,margins fluctuated on regional supply-demand balances. For example, margins improved in North America over the prior year and sales volumes increased for all higher-value products. Margins also improved in most of the Asia, Middle East and eastern Africa operating areas. However, in Europe, Latin America and certain western African countries, changes in product prices were not able to keep pace with feedstock costs, and margins suffered. Early in 2002, profitability was weak in all geographic areas and is not expected to rebound in earnest until the world economies and product demand improve.

The company’s chemical segment was not profitable during 2001, and significant improvement for certain commodity chemicals is not expected until demand more closely matches industry capacity.

MERGER EFFECTS Within 18 months of the merger, ChevronTexaco expects to realize pre-tax savings of approximately $1.8 billion annually through operating efficiencies and the elimination of redundant facilities and operations.

Significant one-time expenses are being incurred in connection with the merger. Total before-tax merger-related expenses, from the time of the merger announcement in October 2000 through the end of 2003, are estimated at $2 billion. Major expenses include employee severance payments; incremental pension and medical plan costs associated with work-force reductions; legal, accounting, SEC filing and investment banker fees; employee and office relocations; and costs for the elimination of redundant facilities and operations. During 2001, $1.563 billion of before-tax ($1.136 billion after tax) merger-related expenses were recorded. Included were accruals of $891 million for employee termination benefits for approximately 4,500 employees, and other merger-related expenses that will not benefit future operations. Payments against the accruals were $105 million. Approximately 1,400 employees were terminated after the merger during 2001. The year-end 2001 accrual balance of $786 million is expected to be nearly extinguished by early 2003, as certain terminating employees are eligible to delay separation payments for one year or more.

As a condition of approving the merger, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) required the disposition of certain Texaco assets, including investments in Equilon and Motiva – joint ventures engaged in U.S. refining, marketing and transportation businesses. The interests in these joint ventures were placed in trust at the time of the merger, and ChevronTexaco no longer exercised control over the joint ventures. Accordingly, the method of accounting for these investments was changed in the fourth quarter 2001 from equity to cost basis. Based on the terms of the sale that closed in February 2002, the company recorded an after-tax charge of $564 million in 2001 for the anticipated loss. Cash proceeds from the sale received in 2002 were $2.2 billion. Indemnification by ChevronTexaco against certain Equilon and Motiva contingent liabilities at the date of sale are discussed in the “On- and off-balance-sheet arrangements” section on page FS-8.

Additional after-tax charges of $79 million were recorded in 2001 for other merger-related asset dispositions, which are expected to result in proceeds of approximately $75 million. Including the loss for the Equilon and Motiva sale, total charges for merger-related asset dispositions of $643 million were recorded in 2001 and classified as an “Extraordinary item” on the Consolidated Statement of Income in accordance with pooling-of-interests reporting requirements of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 16, “Business Combinations.” The net book value of these asset sales that were not completed at year-end 2001 was $2.181 billion and was classified as “Assets held for sale – merger related” in the “Current Assets” section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Net income during 2001 for all merger-related assets that are being sold was approximately $375 million.

OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS AND DEVELOPMENTS Key operating highlights and events during 2001 and early 2002 included:

Worldwide oil and gas reserves The company added approximately 1.2 billion barrels of oil-equivalent reserves during 2001. These additions equated to 127 percent of production for the year. Included were slightly more than 100 million barrels each for the Tengiz Field in Kazakhstan and the Hamaca project in Venezuela as a result of drilling activities. Almost 200 million oil-equivalent barrels were added for natural gas reserves for several fields in Nigeria. About 160 million barrels of the additions during the year were the result of successful discoveries in areas that included Latin America, the North Sea and West Africa. Also, approximately 175 million equivalent-barrels were acquired early in 2001 through the purchase of an additional 5 percent interest in Tengizchevroil, the company’s 50 percent-owned affiliate in Kazakhstan that operates the Tengiz and Korolev fields.

Angola Approximately 30,000 barrels per day of total crude oil production began at the company-operated Phase 1C development in the deepwater Kuito Field in Block 14, where the company holds a 31 percent interest. In Block 0, the North Nemba production and gas injection platform was installed in March 2001. At year-end, total oil production exceeded 30,000 barrels per day. Continuation of the North Nemba development program in 2002 will result in average production of about 40,000 barrels per day. The company is the operator and holds a 39 percent interest.

FS-3 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Nigeria The Escravos Gas Project successfully completed Phase 2 development in 2001, increasing processing capacity to 285 million cubic feet of gas per day. Upon completion of Phase 3 in 2005,capacity is expected to increase to 680 million cubic feet per day. The company holds a 40 percent working interest in the Escravos project. Front-end engineering and design started in March 2001 on the gas-to-liquids project at Escravos. This is the first project to use the Sasol Chevron Global Joint Venture technologies. The company holds a 38 percent interest in the project.

Chad-Cameroon The Doba oil field development — a $3.5 billion project, including a 650-mile pipeline — reached one-third completion at the end of 2001. Initial total production of 225,000 barrels of crude oil per day is expected in 2004. The company holds a 25 percent interest in the project.

Kazakhstan Tengizchevroil (TCO) increased its total production for the eighth straight year, averaging 268,000 barrels per day of crude oil. Engineering for the next major expansion is under way and it is expected to come on line in 2005. The company holds a 50 percent interest in TCO. In October, the first tankers were loaded with crude oil from the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) facilities near the Black Sea port of Novorossiysk. CPC’s pipeline connects the Tengiz Field in western Kazakhstan to Novorossiysk, enabling full access to world market prices for Tengiz oil, and greatly reduces transportation costs. CPC is owned 15 percent by ChevronTexaco.

U.K. North Sea In December 2001, ChevronTexaco received government approval to develop the company-operated Alba Extreme South and Caledonia projects in the North Sea. Both are located in the company’s central North Sea core area, which includes the producing Alba and Britannia fields. frFirst oil production from the Alba Extreme South project is scheduled for the fourth quarter 2002 and will help maintain Alba’s total field production at about 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day. Chevron-Texaco operates the field and holds a 21 percent ownership. First oil from Caledonia is expected late in the third quarter of 2002, and peak field production is anticipated at about 13,000 barrels per day. The company holds a 27 percent interest.

Philippines Gas production commenced in October from the Malampaya Field offshore the Philippine island of Palawan. ChevronTexaco has a 45 percent interest in the landmark gas-to-power project – the largest single foreign investment and the first-ever offshore production of natural gas in the Philippines.

Australia The company made two significant natural gas discoveries offshore Western Australia. Both are located in permit area WA-267-P, where the company operates and holds a 50 percent interest. During 2001, the company approved development of the $1.6 billion LNG expansion project by the North West Shelf venture. A mid-2004 start-up will increase gross liquefied natural gas capacity by about 50 percent. The company holds a one-sixth interest.

China During 2001, an average of about 18,000 barrels per day total of low-sulfur crude oil is being produced after an October start-up at the QHD 32-6 Field in China’s Bohai Bay where ChevronTexaco holds a 24.5 percent interest.

Bangladesh In April 2001, ChevronTexaco was awarded a 60 percent interest in the 1.7 million-acre onshore tract, Block 9, in Bangladesh, east of Dhaka. Block 9 surrounds the Bakhrabad gas field and is adjacent to other major gas-producing areas. Seismic studies are planned in 2002 with initial drilling to commence in late 2002 or early 2003.

Venezuela The company holds a 30 percent interest in the Hamaca integrated oil project, located in Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt. Early production was established during October 2001.After completion of crude oil upgrading facilities in 2004, Hamaca total production is expected to increase to 190,000 barrels per day.

U.S. Gulf of Mexico Typhoon, a deepwater development project, was completed below budget and production commenced in July 2001, two months ahead of schedule. Daily total production averaged about 39,000 oil-equivalent barrels through the end of the year. ChevronTexaco is the operator with a 50 percent interest.

U.S. Refining In December, the company approved a $150 million project at its Pascagoula, Mississippi, refinery to produce low-sulfur gasoline that meets anticipated new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency standards. Regulatory permits have been secured and the activities will commence during 2002. The project is expected to take a year to complete.

Chevron Phillips Chemical Company (CPChem) The company’s 50 percent-owned CPChem affiliate is engaged in a joint venture with BP Solvay to build a new high-density polyethylene (HDPE) facility at CPChem’s Cedar Bayou, Texas, facility that is on track for a start-up in late 2002. The 700 million pounds-per-year HDPE facility will be the largest of its kind in the world. A world-scale olefins and polyolefins complex in Qatar also is expected to start production in late 2002. The facility will be owned and operated by Qatar Chemical Company, a joint venture between CPChem, with a 49 percent interest, and Qatar General Petroleum.

Dynegy Inc. In November 2001, ChevronTexaco acquired $1.5 billion in redeemable, convertible preferred shares of its Dynegy affiliate. In early 2002, ChevronTexaco purchased approximately $200 million of additional Dynegy common shares to maintain its 26.5 percent ownership interest following Dynegy’s public equity offering in December 2001.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Sales and other operating revenues were $104 billion in 2001, compared with $117 billion in 2000 and $84 billion in 1999. Revenues in 2001 declined on lower average realizations for crude oil and refined products. The increase in 2000 from 1999 was primarily the result of sharply higher prices for crude oil, natural gas and refined products. The effect of higher prices in 2000 was partially offset by the absence of chemicals revenues in the second half of the year due to the July 1, 2000, formation of CPChem, which is accounted for under the equity method.

Income from equity affiliates totaled $1.1 billion in 2001, $1.1 billion in 2000 and $0.9 billion in 1999. Equity income increased marginally in 2001 on the strength of improved earnings for Equilon, Motiva and Dynegy, partially offset by lower earnings for Tengizchevroil and LG-Caltex and by larger losses from CPChem. In 2000, increases in earnings from Tengiz-chevroil and Motiva were partially offset by lower earnings from Equilon and LG-Caltex and losses from CPChem.

Other income totaled $0.7 billion in 2001, $1.0 billion in 2000 and $0.8 billion in 1999. The fluctuations between years were the result of changes in net gains and losses from asset sales and interest income from investments.

FS-4 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Purchased crude oil and products costs of $60.5 billion in 2001 were lower than the $69.8 billion in 2000 – primarily due to lower crude oil prices – but about 30 percent higher than the $46.3 billion in 1999 when average crude oil prices were recovering from 20-year lows that occurred in 1998. Offsetting some of the effect of higher prices since 1999 was the absence of such costs associated with the chemicals operations contributed to CPChem in July 2000.

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding the effects of special items, were about the same at $11.5 billion in 2001 and 2000. Similar expenses in 1999 were $10.8 billion, reflecting mainly higher fuel costs for the company’s plants and facilities. Mitigating this effect since mid-2000 was the absence of expenses associated with the chemicals operations contributed to CPChem.

Millions of dollars	2001	2000	1999
Operating Expenses	$ 7,650	$ 8,323	$ 7,773
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses	3,984	3,626	3,222
Total Operating Expenses	11,634	11,949	10,995
Less: Special Charges, Before Tax	164	488	199
Adjusted Total Operating Expenses	$ 11,470	$ 11,461	$ 10,796

Exploration expenses were $1.0 billion in 2001, compared with $0.9 billion in 2000 and $1.1 billion in 1999. In 2001, well write-offs were $184 million higher compared with 2000 – which more than offset declines in other exploration expenses. The increased write-offs reflected, in part, a reprioritization of development opportunities post-merger.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense was $7.1 billion in 2001, compared with $5.3 billion in 2000 and $4.9 billion in 1999. Depreciation expense associated with asset impairments was $2.3 billion in 2001, compared with $0.7 billion in 2000 and $0.4 billion in 1999. After adjusting for the effect of impairments, the expense amounts were $4.8 billion in 2001, $4.6 billion in 2000 and $4.5 billion in 1999. Higher expense in 2001 on this adjusted basis resulted from higher capital spending, reserve revisions and additional abandonment provisions, while 2000 was higher than 1999 because production between years increased. The expense in 2000 also reflected lower depreciation in chemicals, resulting from the CPChem joint venture formation.

Income tax expenses were $4.4 billion in 2001, $6.3 billion in 2000 and $2.6 billion in 1999, reflecting effective income tax rates of 53 percent, 45 percent and 44 percent for each of the three years, respectively.

The increase in the 2001 effective tax rate was primarily due to U.S. before-tax income (generally subject to a lower tax rate) being a significantly smaller percentage of overall before-tax income in 2001 compared with 2000. The decline in the U.S. before-tax income arose primarily because substantially all of the 2001 merger-related expenses were associated with operations in the United States.

Foreign currency gains in 2001 were $191 million, compared with gains of $182 million in 2000 and losses of $15 million in 1999. Approximately $150 million of the gains in 2001 were attributable to the devaluation of the Argentine peso late in the year. Excluding this impact, currency gains were lower than in 2000 primarily due to fluctuations of the Netherlands and Australian currencies. The losses in 1999 were primarily in Australia.

U.S. Exploration and Production

Millions of dollars — Earnings Excluding Special Items	2001 — $ 2,890	$	3,736	$	1,390
Asset Write-Offs and Revaluations	(1,168	)	(176	)	(204	)
Asset Dispositions	49		(107	)	–
Prior-Year Tax Adjustments	8		–		–
Restructurings and Reorganizations	–		–		(53	)
Total Special Items	(1,111	)	(283	)	(257	)
Segment Income	$ 1,779	$	3,453	$	1,133

U.S. exploration and production earnings, excluding special items, declined in 2001 primarily because of significantly lower crude oil prices. Oil-equivalent production was also down 8 percent. Higher earnings in 2000, compared with 1999, were mainly the result of increased prices for crude oil and natural gas. Partially offsetting the benefit of higher prices was a decline in oil-equivalent production of 7 percent between years.

The company’s average 2001 U.S. crude oil realization was $21.70 per barrel, compared with $26.69 in 2000 and $15.50 in 1999. The average U.S. natural gas realization was $4.38 per thousand cubic feet in 2001, compared with $3.87 and $2.12 in 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Net liquids production for 2001 averaged 614,000 barrels per day, down 8 percent from 2000 and 14 percent from 1999. Net natural gas production averaged 2.7 billion cubic feet per day in 2000,down 7 percent from 2000 and 14 percent from 1999. The lower oil-equivalent production reflected normal field declines and asset sales, partially offset by new and enhanced production in the deep water and other areas of the Gulf of Mexico.

Special items in 2001 included a $1.0 billion impairment of the Midway Sunset Field in California’s San Joaquin Valley. The impairment was a result of the write-down in proved crude oil reserve quantities, upon determination of lower-than-projected oil recovery from the field’s steam injection process.

International Exploration and Production

Millions of dollars — Earnings Excluding Special Items*	2001 — $ 2,905	$	3,622	1999 — $ 1,520
Asset Write-Offs and Revaluations	(247	)	–	–
Asset Dispositions –			80	–
Prior-Year Tax Adjustments	(125	)	–	(47	)
Restructurings and Reorganizations	–		–	(23	)
Total Special Items	(372	)	80	(70	)
Segment Income*	$ 2,533	$	3,702	$ 1,450
*Includes Foreign Currency Gains:	$ 181	$	97	$ 9

International exploration and production earnings, excluding special items, declined in 2001 primarily on lower average crude oil prices. Partially offsetting this effect was an increase of about 3 percent in oil-equivalent production and higher natural gas prices. Earnings in 2000 improved from 1999 on significantly higher crude oil and natural gas prices; oil-equivalent production between years was flat.

FS-5 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

The average liquids realization, including equity affiliates, was $22.17 per barrel in 2001, compared with $26.04 in 2000 and $16.57 in 1999. The average natural gas realization was $2.36 per thousand cubic feet in 2001, compared with $2.09 in 2000 and $1.66 in 1999.

Daily net liquids production of 1.345 million barrels in 2001 increased about 1 percent from 1.330 million barrels in 2000 and 1.337 million barrels in 1999. Production increases in Kazakhstan during 2001 more than offset lower volumes from Indonesia. In 2000, increases in Argentina, Kazakhstan, Kuwait and Thailand did not offset declines in Indonesia and the United Kingdom.

Net natural gas production of 1.711 billion cubic feet per day in 2001 was up 10 percent from 2000 and more than 13 percent from 1999. Most notable among the geographic areas with production increases were Kazakhstan, Trinidad and Canada. In 2000, production increases were primarily in Argentina, Colombia, Kazakhstan and Thailand, partially offset by lower production from normal declines in mature fields in Canada and the United Kingdom.

Special items in 2001 included a $247 million impairment of the LL-652 Field in Venezuela – as slower-than-expected reservoir repressurization resulted in a reduction in the projected volumes of oil recoverable during the company’s remaining contract period of operation.

U.S. Refining, Marketing and Transportation

Millions of dollars — Earnings Excluding Special Items	2001 — $ 1,332	$	974	$	638
Asset Write-Offs and Revaluations	–		–		(76	)
Asset Dispositions	–		–		75
Environmental Remediation Provisions	(78	)	(191	)	(40	)
Restructurings and Reorganizations	–		–		(46	)
Litigation and Regulatory	–		(62	)	–
Total Special Items	(78	)	(253	)	(87	)
Segment Income	$ 1,254	$	721	$	551

U.S. refining, marketing and transportation earnings in 2001, excluding special items, increased 37 percent to $1.332 billion and more than doubled 1999 earnings of $638 million. Amounts included the company’s share of equity income for the Equilon and Motiva joint ventures until the October 2001 merger, when these interests were placed in trust. Post-merger, the investments were accounted for on the cost basis, and earnings included dividend income, a component of other income, rather than the equity income as was recognized pre-merger.

Earnings increases in 2001 reflected significantly higher gasoline sales margins – especially early in the year – partially offset by weaker distillate sales margins and higher operating expense. Higher sales volumes across all major product lines also contributed to the improvement. Earnings in 2000 improved from 1999, particularly on the East and Gulf coasts. Earnings in 1999 suffered from lower sales margins and operational problems at the company’s California refineries.

Refined products sales volumes of 2.577 million barrels per day in 2001 decreased about 3 percent from 2000 and 2 percent from 1999. The 2001 sales volumes reflected pre-merger sales only for Equilon and Motiva. Sales in 2000 suffered from the effect of 1999 year-end stockpiling by customers in anticipation of possible Year 2000-related interruptions. The average U.S. refined products sales realization of $30.45 per barrel in 2001 was down 25 percent from the 2000 average of $40.75, but up 19 percent from depressed levels in 1999.

International Refining, Marketing and Transportation

Millions of dollars — Earnings Excluding Special Items*	2001 — $ 598	$	526	$	615
Asset Write-Offs and Revaluations	(46	)	(112	)	–
Asset Dispositions	–		–		(111	)
Prior-Year Tax Adjustments	8		–		114
Restructurings and Reorganizations	–		–		(72	)
Total Special Items	(38	)	(112	)	(69	)
Segment Income*	$ 560	$	414	$	546
*Includes Foreign Currency Gains (Losses):	$ 23	$	107	$	(27	)

International refining, marketing and transportation earnings include results of the company’s consolidated refining and marketing businesses, international marine operations, international supply and trading activities, and equity earnings of primarily Asia-Pacific affiliates. Excluding special items, 2001 earnings of $598 million were up 14 percent from 2000, but about 3 percent lower than in 1999.

Earnings in most of Asia, the Middle East and eastern Africa and South Africa operating areas improved significantly in 2001 because of improved marketing margins, particularly early in the year. Partially offsetting the marketing improvement were higher costs and somewhat lower refining margins. Earnings decreased in 2000, compared with 1999, on lower marketing margins and refined products sales volumes. The region suffered from a very competitive operating environment, including excess refinery capacity.

European operations suffered from low marketing and refining margins and lower sales volumes in 2001 compared with prior years, primarily due to weaker economic conditions. Latin American earnings were nearly level with 2000,with improved refining margins almost offsetting the declining sales volumes and marketing margins. In 2000, weaker margins in Latin America and West Africa resulted in lower earnings compared with 1999. These were partially offset by increased earnings in Europe, driven by higher margins in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

International refined products sales volumes were 2.495 million barrels per day in 2001, down about 1 percent from 2.521 million in 2000 and about 5 percent lower than 2.621 million in 1999. Weaker economic conditions, particularly in Europe, dampened demand in 2001. Lower trading volumes and the third quarter 1999 sale of the company’s equity interest in Koa Oil Company Limited in Japan were responsible for the decline in sales volumes in 2000.

FS-6 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Chemicals

Millions of dollars — (Loss) Earnings Excluding Special Items*	2001 — $ (32	)	2000 — $ 130		1999 — $ 174
Asset Write-Offs and Revaluations	(96	)	(90	)	(43	)
Restructurings and Reorganizations	–		–		(22	)
Total Special Items	(96	)	(90	)	(65	)
Segment (Loss) Income*	$ (128	)	$ 40		$ 109
*Includes Foreign Currency (Losses) Gains:	$ (3	)	$ (2	)	$ 3

Chemicals earnings include results from the company’s Oronite division, the company’s petrochemicals business prior to its contribution to CPChem in July 2000, and equity earnings in CPChem from that date. After excluding the effect of special items, the segment recorded a loss of $32 million in 2001, compared with earnings of $130 million in 2000 and $174 million in 1999. Results for all years reflected a protracted period of generally weak demand for commodity chemicals and industry over-capacity.

Special items in 2001 and 2000 include write-downs in the CPChem operations in Puerto Rico.

SELECTED OPERATING DATA

	2001	2000	1999
U.S. Exploration and Production
Net Crude Oil and Natural Gas
Liquids Production (MBPD)	614	667	712
Net Natural Gas Production (MMCFPD)	2,706	2,910	3,145
Natural Gas Sales (MMCFPD) 1	7,830	7,302	6,534
Natural Gas Liquids Sales (MBPD) 1	340	373	415
Revenues from Net Production
Crude Oil ($/Bbl)	$ 21.70	$ 26.69	$ 15.50
Natural Gas ($/MCF)	$ 4.38	$ 3.87	$ 2.12
International Exploration
and Production 1
Net Crude Oil and Natural Gas
Liquids Production (MBPD)	1,345	1,330	1,337
Net Natural Gas Production (MMCFPD)	1,711	1,556	1,512
Natural Gas Sales (MMCFPD)	2,675	2,398	2,342
Natural Gas Liquids Sales (MBPD)	90	67	58
Revenues from Liftings
Liquids ($/Bbl)	$ 22.17	$ 26.04	$ 16.57
Natural Gas ($/MCF)	$ 2.36	$ 2.09	$ 1.66
Other Produced Volumes (MBPD) 3	105	123	96
U.S. Refining, Marketing
and Transportation 1,2
Gasoline Sales (MBPD)	1,246	1,320	1,266
Other Refined Products Sales (MBPD)	1,331	1,347	1,357
Refinery Input (MBPD)	1,286	1,337	1,484
Average Refined Products
Sales Price ($/Bbl)	$ 30.45	$ 40.75	$ 25.50
International Refining,
Marketing and Transportation 1
Refined Products Sales (MBPD)	2,495	2,521	2,621
Refinery Input (MBPD)	1,136	1,150	1,235

| MBPD = Thousands of barrels per day; MMCFPD = Millions of cubic feet per day;
Bbl = Barrel; MCF = Thousands of cubic feet. |
| --- |
| 1 Includes equity in affiliates. |
| 2 Includes Equilon and Motiva pre-merger. |
| 3 Represents total field production under the Boscan operating service
agreement in Venezuela, and in 2000 included a Colombian operating service agreement. |

All Other

Millions of dollars — Net Charges Excluding Special Items*	2001 — $ (883	)	2000 — $ (883	)	1999 — $ (899	)
Asset Write-Offs and Revaluations	(152	)	–		(54	)
Asset Dispositions	–		99		147
Prior-Year Tax Adjustments	104		107		161
Environmental Remediation	–		(73	)	–
Restructurings and Reorganizations	–		–		(41	)
Litigation and Regulatory	–		–		104
Other	–		147		40
Total Special Items	(48	)	280		357
Merger Effects	(1,779	)	–		–
Segment Charges*	$ (2,710	)	$ (603	)	$ (542	)
*Includes Foreign Currency Losses:	$ (10	)	$ (20	)	$ –

All Other consists of coal mining operations, the company’s equity interest in Dynegy Inc. – a gatherer, processor, transporter and marketer of energy products – corporate administrative costs, worldwide cash management and debt financing activities, power and gasification ventures, technology investments and real estate and insurance activities.

Earnings, excluding special items, for coal operations were $19 million in 2001 compared with $1 million in 2000 and $34 million in 1999. The improved earnings in 2001 resulted from increased sales volumes, productivity improvements and the absence of a work stoppage that in 2000 lasted several months.

The company’s share of Dynegy earnings before special items in 2001 was $175 million, up from $119 million in 2000 and $44 million in 1999. Significantly higher prices for natural gas and natural gas liquids and an increase in earnings from power generation activities were the primary reasons for the improved results in 2001 from the previous periods.

Net charges for the balance of the All Other segment, excluding special items, were $1.077 billion in 2001, $1.003 billion in 2000 and $977 million in 1999. Increases in various corporate expenses essentially offset the benefits of lower interest expense and higher interest income in 2001 and 2000.

Merger effects in 2001 represented the sum of $1.136 billion for merger-related expenses and $643 million for losses on merger-related asset dispositions.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were approximately $3.2 billion at the end of both 2001 and 2000. Cash provided by operating activities in 2001 was $11.5 billion, compared with $13.5 billion in 2000 and $7.8 billion in 1999. Cash provided by asset sales was $0.3 billion in 2001, $1.2 billion in 2000 and $1.6 billion in 1999. During 2001, the company’s overall debt levels increased to $17.4 billion at December 31, 2001, compared with $15.9 billion at December 31, 2000. Improved cash flows in 2000 permitted the company to reduce overall debt levels by $3.2 billion and repurchase $1.5 billion of the company’s common shares, net of sales. In addition, the company received a cash distribution of $835 million in 2000 from CPChem after the joint venture obtained debt financing. In 1999, a payment of $775 million was made to Occidental Petroleum in settlement of the Cities Service lawsuit.

FS-7 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

In February 2002, the company completed the sale of its investments in Equilon and Motiva to Shell and Saudi Refining Inc. for proceeds of $2.2 billion.

Dividends ChevronTexaco paid common stock dividends of $2,733 million, $2,664 million and $2,589 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Dividends on Texaco preferred shares were $6 million, $15 million and $28 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. In addition, dividends of $119 million, $110 million and $55 million were paid for the three years to stockholders who hold minority interests in ChevronTexaco subsidiary companies.

Debt, lease and minority interest obligations ChevronTexaco’s total debt and capital lease obligations were $17.4 billion at December 31, 2001, up from $15.9 billion at year-end 2000. In addition, at December 31, 2001, the company had minority interest obligations of $283 million, down from $746 million at December 31, 2000. In 2001, net repayments of $2.4 billion in long-term debt were more than offset by proceeds of $3.8 billion from new short-term debt. Changes in long-term debt during 2001 included a non-cash reduction of $100 million of ESOP debt. In addition to the repayments of long-term debt during 2001, $463 million of Monthly Income Preferred shares, which were accounted for as minority interest, and $300 million of Texaco Market Auction Preferred Shares were redeemed.

At year-end 2001, ChevronTexaco had $3.2 billion in committed credit facilities with various major banks, which permit the refinancing of short-term obligations on a long-term basis. These facilities support commercial paper borrowing and also can be used for general credit requirements. No borrowings were outstanding under these facilities during the year or at year-end 2001. In addition, ChevronTexaco has three existing “shelf” registrations on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission that together would permit registered offerings of up to $2.8 billion of debt securities. Additionally, at December 31, 2001, the company had lines of credit available for short-term financing totaling $500 million, of which $210 million had not been utilized.

The company’s debt due within 12 months, consisting primarily of commercial paper and the current portion of long-term debt, totaled $11.6 billion at December 31, 2001, up from $8.2 billion at December 31, 2000. Of this total short-term debt, $3.2 billion was reclassified to long-term at year-end 2001. Settlement of these obligations was not expected to require the use of working capital in 2002, as the company had the intent and the ability, as evidenced by committed credit facilities, to refinance them on a long-term basis. The company’s practice has been to continually refinance its commercial paper, maintaining levels it believes to be appropriate.

The company’s future debt level is dependent primarily on its results of operations, its capital-spending program and cash that may be generated from asset dispositions. The company believes it has substantial borrowing capacity to meet unanticipated cash requirements. In periods of sustained low crude oil and natural gas prices (below levels of approximately $20 per barrel for West Texas Intermediate benchmark crude oil and $2.50 per thousand cubic feet for Henry Hub benchmark natural gas) and narrow refined products margins, cash provided by operating activities and asset sales may not be sufficient to fund the company’s investing activities and may result in increased borrowings or a reduction in overall cash levels. ChevronTexaco’s senior debt is rated AA by Standard and Poor’s Corporation and Aa2 by Moody’s Investor Service, except for senior debt of Texaco Inc. which is rated Aa3. ChevronTexaco’s U.S. commercial paper is rated A-1+ by Standard and Poor’s and Prime 1 by Moody’s, and the company’s Canadian commercial paper is rated R-1 (middle) by Dominion Bond Rating Service. All of these ratings denote high-quality, investment-grade securities.

Share repurchase programs In December 1997, Chevron’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $2 billion of the company’s outstanding common stock for use in its employee stock option programs. Total repurchases from the program’s inception through the end of 2000 were 23.3 million shares at a cost of $1.9 billion. The program was formally terminated in September 2001.

In March 1998, Texaco’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $1 billion of Texaco’s outstanding common stock. This program was suspended in October 2000, prior to the announcement of the planned merger with Chevron. At that time, 11.4 million shares had been acquired at a cost of $643 million.

On- and off-balance-sheet arrangements The following tables summarize the company’s material on- and off-balance-sheet obligations at year-end 2001.

Contractual Obligations

Millions of dollars	Payments Due by Period
			2003–		After
	Total	2002	2005	2006	2006
On balance sheet:
Long-term debt 1	$ 6,599	$ 1,095	$ 1,963	$ 195	$ 3,346
Short-term debt 2	3,200	–	–	–	3,200
Noncancelable capital
lease obligations	954	80	214	47	613
Redemption of subsidiary’s
preferred shares	199	–	199	–	–
Off balance sheet:
Noncancelable operating
lease obligations	2,541	692	881	237	731
Unconditional purchase
obligations	5,598	1,157	3,231	861	349
Through-put and
take-or-pay agreements	2,060	213	652	233	962

| 1 Includes guarantee of $535 of ESOP debt, $100 due in 2002, $85 during 2003 – 2005 and
$350 due after 2006. |
| --- |
| 2 Continually refinanced on a long-term basis. |

Commercial Commitments (Off Balance Sheet)

Millions of dollars	Commitment Expiration by Period
			2003 –		After
	Total	2002	2005	2006	2006
Guarantees of non-consolidated
affiliates or joint venture
obligations*	$ 686	$ 211	$ 33	$ –	$ 442
Guarantees of obligations
of unrelated parties	742	141	225	34	342

• Excludes $432 related to Equilon and Motiva. See Note 22.

FS-8 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

ChevronTexaco provided certain indemnities for contingent liabilities of Equilon and Motiva to Shell Oil and Saudi Refining Inc. as part of the agreement for the sale of the company’s interests in those investments. Generally, the indemnities provided are limited to contingent liabilities that may mature within 18 months of the sale of the company’s interests and are reduced by any reserves that were established prior to the sale. Excluding environmental liabilities, the company’s financial exposure related to those indemnities is contractually limited to $300 million. Additionally, the company has provided indemnities for certain environmental liabilities arising out of conditions that existed prior to the formation of Equilon and Motiva and during the periods of ChevronTexaco’s ownership interest in those entities as well as for customary representation and warranties within the agreements.

In other off-balance-sheet arrangements, the company securitizes certain accounts receivable in its downstream business through the use of qualifying special purpose entities (SPEs). At December 31, 2001, approximately $850 million, representing about 10 percent of ChevronTexaco’s total current accounts receivable balance, were securitized. ChevronTexaco’s total estimated financial exposure under these arrangements at December 31, 2001, was approximately $50 million. These arrangements have the effect of accelerating ChevronTexaco’s collection of the securitized amounts. In the event of the SPEs experiencing major defaults in the collection of receivables, ChevronTexaco would have no loss exposure connected with third-party investments in these securitization arrangements.

The above information should also be read in conjunction with Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Other Contingencies and Commitments on page FS-40.

FINANCIAL RATIOS The year-end current ratio is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. Generally, two items adversely affected ChevronTexaco’s current ratio, but in the company’s opinion do not affect its liquidity. First, current assets in all years included inventories valued on a LIFO basis, which at year-end 2001 were lower than replacement costs, based on average acquisition costs during the year, by nearly $1.6 billion. Also, because the company carries a larger percentage of short-term debt, it benefits from lower interest cost by continually refinancing its commercial paper.

The interest coverage ratio is defined as income before income tax expense, plus interest and debt expense and amortization of capitalized interest, divided by before-tax interest costs. ChevronTexaco’s interest coverage ratio was lower in 2001, primarily due to lower before-tax income partially offset by lower interest expense as a result of replacing long-term debt with lower interest rate commercial paper obligations. The company’s debt ratio (total debt divided by total debt plus equity) increased to 33.9 percent in 2001, due to an increase in total debt for the year.

Financial Ratios

Current Ratio	0.9	1.1	1.0
Interest Coverage Ratio	9.6	12.5	6.0
Total Debt/Total Debt Plus Equity	33.9 %	32.3 %	39.2 %

FINANCIAL AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS Commodity Derivative Instruments ChevronTexaco is exposed to market risks related to the volatility of crude oil, refined products, natural gas and refinery feedstock prices. The company uses derivative commodity instruments to manage its exposure to price volatility on a small portion of its activity, including: firm commitments and anticipated transactions for the purchase or sale of crude oil, feedstock purchases for company refineries, crude oil and refined products inventories, and fixed-price contracts to sell natural gas and natural gas liquids.

ChevronTexaco also uses derivative commodity instruments for trading purposes, and the results of this activity are not material to the company’s financial position, net income or cash flows.

The company’s positions are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with the company’s stated risk management policy that has been approved by the company’s Board of Directors.

The derivative instruments used in the company’s risk management and trading activities consist mainly of futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange and the International Petroleum Exchange, crude oil and natural gas swap contracts, options and other derivative products entered into principally with major financial institutions and other oil and gas companies. Virtually all derivatives beyond those designated as normal purchase and normal sale contracts are recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income. Fair values are derived principally from market quotes and other independent third-party quotes.

The aggregate effect of a hypothetical 15 percent change in prices for natural gas, crude oil and petroleum products would not be material to the company’s financial position, net income or cash flows. The hypothetical loss on the related commodity contracts was estimated by calculating the cash value of the contracts as the difference between the hypothetical and contract delivery prices, multiplied by the contract amounts.

Foreign Currency The company enters into forward exchange contracts, generally with terms of 180 days or less, to manage some of its foreign currency exposures. These exposures include revenue and anticipated purchase transactions, including foreign currency capital expenditures and lease commitments forecasted to occur within 180 days. The forward exchange contracts are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income.

The aggregate effect of a hypothetical adverse change of 10 percent to year-end exchange rates (a weakening of the U.S. dollar) would not be material to the company’s financial position, net income or cash flows.

Interest Rates The company enters into interest rate swaps as part of its overall strategy to manage the interest rate risk on its debt. Under the terms of the swaps, net cash settlements are based on the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to agreed notional principal amounts. Interest rate swaps hedging a portion of the company’s fixed-rate debt are accounted for as fair value hedges, whereas interest rate swaps relating to a portion of the company’s floating-rate debt are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income. During 2001, no new swaps were initiated in connection with debt

FS-9 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

issues in the year. At year-end 2001, the weighted average maturity of interest rate swaps was approximately five years.

A hypothetical 10 percent increase in interest rates upon the interest rate swaps would cause the fair value of the “receive fixed” swaps to decline and the “receive floating” swaps to increase. The aggregate effect of these changes would not be material to the company’s financial position, net income or cash flows.

The company’s $1.5 billion investment in redeemable, convertible preferred stock of Dynegy is carried at fair value.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES ChevronTexaco enters into a number of business arrangements with related parties, principally its equity affiliates. These arrangements include long-term supply or offtake agreements. In the United States, there are long-term agreements in place with Dynegy for the purchase of substantially all natural gas and natural gas liquids produced by legacy Chevron in the United States, excluding Alaska, and the supply of natural gas and natural gas liquids feedstocks to the company’s U.S. refineries and chemicals plants. In early 2002, the company was negotiating to expand these agreements to include substantially all legacy Texaco U.S. production of natural gas and natural gas liquids. Internationally, there are long-term purchase agreements in place with the company’s refining affiliate in Thailand. Management believes the foregoing agreements and others have been negotiated on terms consistent with those that would have been negotiated with an unrelated third party.

CAPITAL AND EXPLORATORY EXPENDITURES Worldwide capital and exploratory expenditures for 2001 totaled $12.0 billion,including the company’s equity share of affiliates’ expenditures. Capital and exploratory expenditures were $9.5 billion in 2000 and $10.1 billion in 1999. Expenditures for exploration and production activities represented 59 percent of total outlays in 2001, compared with 65 percent in 2000 and 72 percent in 1999. International exploration and production spending was 66 percent of worldwide exploration and production expenditures in 2001, compared with 62 percent in 2000 and 75 percent in 1999, reflecting the company’s continuing focus on international exploration and production activities. Expenditures in 2001 included additional investments in Tengizchevroil and the purchase of $1.5 billion of redeemable, convertible preferred shares of Dynegy stock. Expenditures in the All Other segment in 2000 included an additional investment of approximately $300 million in Dynegy Inc. Included in 1999 were expenditures of about $1.7 billion – mainly cash and assumption of debt – for the acquisition of Rutherford-Moran Oil Corporation and Petrolera Argentina San Jorge S.A., exploration and production businesses in Thailand and Argentina, respectively.

The company estimates 2002 capital and exploratory expenditures at $9.4 billion, including ChevronTexaco’s share of spending by affiliates. Excluding the 2001 amounts for the increased investment in Tengizchevroil and the Dynegy redeemable, convertible preferred stock, spending between years is expected to be about 9 percent lower in 2002. About $6.1 billion,or 65 percent of the total, is targeted for exploration and production activities, with $1.8 billion of that in the United States. Worldwide downstream spending is estimated at $1.7 billion,and investments in chemicals are budgeted at $400 million. Budgeted expenditures for power and related businesses are $800 million. The remaining $400 million is primarily targeted for emerging technologies and information technology infrastructure.

PRE-MERGER EMPLOYEE TERMINATION BENEFITS AND OTHER RESTRUCTURING COSTS Chevron recorded before-tax charges of $235 million in 1999 for employee termination benefits and other restructuring costs as part of a 3,500-employee reduction program in all its operating segments across several business functions. Employees affected were primarily U.S.-based, and all employee terminations were completed by December 2000. Termination benefits for approximately 3,100 of the 3,500 employees were paid from the assets of Chevron’s U.S. and Canadian pension plans.

In the fourth quarter 1998, Texaco recorded $115 million before tax for a corporatewide reorganization affecting 1,400 employees. During the second quarter 1999, the program was expanded by about 1,200 employees and an additional $48 million before-tax was accrued. By the end of the third quarter 2000, the employee reductions were met and all termination payments were made.

During the first quarter of 2000, Texaco recorded $17 million before tax for the termination of an additional 200 employees. Terminations and payments were completed by the end of the first quarter 2001.

Caltex recorded charges of $37 million in 1999 for restructuring activities that included severance and other termination benefits of $23 million for 200 employees. By December 2000, all work force reductions and separation payments were completed.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Virtually all aspects of the businesses in which the company engages are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These regulatory requirements continue to increase in both number and complexity over time and govern not only the manner in which the

Capital and Exploratory Expenditures			2001			2000			1999
		Inter-			Inter-			Inter-
Millions of dollars	U.S.	national	Total	U.S.	national	Total	U.S.	national	Total
Exploration and Production	$ 2,420	$ 4,709	$ 7,129	$ 2,354	$ 3,897	$ 6,251	$ 1,811	$ 5,479	$ 7,290
Refining, Marketing and Transportation	873	1,271	2,144	919	1,121	2,040	946	1,003	1,949
Chemicals	145	34	179	135	51	186	326	136	462
All Other	2,570	6	2,576	891	152	1,043	311	125	436
Total	$ 6,008	$ 6,020	$ 12,028	$ 4,299	$ 5,221	$ 9,520	$ 3,394	$ 6,743	$ 10,137
Total, Excluding Equity in Affiliates	$ 4,934	$ 5,382	$ 10,316	$ 3,594	$ 4,697	$ 8,291	$ 2,871	$ 6,161	$ 9,032

FS-10 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

company conducts its operations, but also the products it sells. Most of the costs of complying with laws and regulations pertaining to company operations and products are embedded in the normal costs of doing business.

Accidental leaks and spills requiring cleanup may occur in the ordinary course of business. In addition to the costs for environmental protection associated with its ongoing operations and products, the company may incur expenses for corrective actions at various owned and previously owned facilities and at third-party owned waste-disposal sites used by the company. An obligation may arise when operations are closed or sold or at non-ChevronTexaco sites where company products have been handled or disposed of. Most of the expenditures to fulfill these obligations relate to facilities and sites where past operations followed practices and procedures that were considered acceptable at the time but now require investigative and/or remedial work to meet current standards.

Using definitions and guidelines established by the American Petroleum Institute, ChevronTexaco estimated its world-wide environmental spending in 2001 at $1.246 billion for its consolidated companies. Included in these expenditures were $323 million of environmental capital expenditures and $923 million of costs associated with the control and abatement of hazardous substances and pollutants from ongoing operations. For 2002, total worldwide environmental capital expenditures are estimated at $495 million. These capital costs are in addition to the ongoing costs of complying with environmental regulations and the costs to remediate previously contaminated sites.

The following table analyzes the annual changes to the company’s before-tax environmental remediation reserves, including those for Superfund sites. For 2001, the company recorded additional provisions for estimated remediation costs at refined products marketing sites and various producing properties in the United States.

Millions of dollars — Balance at January 1	2001 — $ 1,234	$	1,079	$	1,132
Expense Provisions	216		429		275
Expenditures	(290	)	(274	)	(328	)
Balance at December 31	$ 1,160	$	1,234	$	1,079

Under provisions of the Superfund law, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated ChevronTexaco a potentially responsible party, or has otherwise involved the company, in the remediation of 413 hazardous waste sites. The company made provisions or payments in 2001 and prior years for approximately 287 of these sites. No single site is expected to result in a material liability for the company. For the remaining sites, investigations are not yet at a stage where the company is able to quantify a probable liability or determine a range of reasonably possible exposures. The Superfund law provides for joint and several liability for all responsible parties. Any future actions by the EPA and other regulatory agencies to require ChevronTexaco to assume other potentially responsible parties’ costs at designated hazardous waste sites are not expected to have a material effect on the company’s consolidated financial position or liquidity. Remediation reserves at year-end 2001, 2000 and 1999 for Superfund sites were $62 million, $73 million and $79 million, respectively.

It is likely that the company will continue to incur additional liabilities, beyond those recorded, for environmental remediation relating to past operations. These future costs are indeterminable due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, the determination of the company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties. While the amount of future costs may be material to the company’s results of operations in the period in which they are recognized, the company does not expect these costs will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or liquidity. Also, the company does not believe its obligations to make such expenditures have had, or will have, any significant impact on the company’s competitive position relative to other petroleum or chemicals companies.

The company maintains additional reserves for dismantlement, abandonment and restoration of its worldwide oil and gas and coal properties at the end of their productive lives. Many of these costs are related to environmental issues. Expense provisions are recognized on a unit-of-production basis. The reserves balance at year-end 2001 was $2.2 billion and is included in “Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization” in the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

For the company’s other ongoing operating assets, such as refineries and chemicals facilities, no provisions are made for exit or cleanup costs that may be required when such assets reach the end of their useful lives, unless a decision to sell or otherwise abandon the facility has been made.

LITIGATION AND OTHER UNCERTAINTIES Chevron, Texaco and four other oil companies (refiners) filed suit in 1995 contesting the validity of a patent granted to Unocal Corporation (Unocal) for reformulated gasoline, which ChevronTexaco sells in California in certain months of the year. In March 2000, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a September 1998 District Court decision that Unocal’s patent was valid and enforceable and assessed damages of 5.75 cents per gallon for gasoline produced in infringement of the patent. In May 2000, the Federal Circuit Court denied a petition for rehearing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit filed by the refiners in this case. The refiners petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court, and in February 2001, the Supreme Court denied the petition to review the lower court’s ruling, and the case was remanded to the District Court for an accounting of all infringing gasoline produced from August 1, 1996, to September 30, 2000. The District Court granted Unocal’s motion for summary judgment requesting an accounting and denied the refiners’ motion to stay the proceedings and vacate the accounting order. However, the judge presiding over this case recused himself before entering a final judgment and a new judge was assigned. Additionally, in May 2001, the U.S. Patent Office (USPO) granted the refiners’petition to reexamine the validity of Unocal’s patent and in February 2002, the USPO ruled the patent invalid. Unocal has two months to respond to the USPO ruling. The Federal Trade Commission also announced that it was investigating whether Unocal’s failure to disclose to the California Air Resources Board that it had filed a patent application was unfair competition, which may make Unocal’s patent unenforceable.

FS-11 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

If Unocal’s patent ultimately is upheld and is enforceable, the company’s financial exposure includes royalties, plus interest, for production of gasoline that is proven to have infringed the patent. Chevron and Texaco, as well as Texaco’s former affiliates Equilon and Motiva, have been accruing in the normal course of business any future estimated liability for potential infringement of the patent covered by the trial court’s ruling. In 2000, Chevron and Texaco made payments to Unocal totaling approximately $28 million for the original court ruling, including interest and fees.

Unocal obtained additional patents for alternate formulations that could affect a larger share of U.S. gasoline production. ChevronTexaco believes these additional patents are invalid and unenforceable. However, if such patents are ultimately upheld, the competitive and financial effects on the company’s refining and marketing operations, while presently indeterminable, could be material.

Another issue involving the company is the petroleum industry’s use of methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) as a gasoline additive and its potential environmental impact through seepage into groundwater. Along with other oil companies, the company is a party to lawsuits and claims related to the use of the chemical MTBE in certain oxygenated gasolines. These actions may require the company to correct or ameliorate the alleged effects on the environment of prior release of MTBE by the company or other parties. Additional lawsuits and claims related to the use of MTBE, including personal-injury claims, may be filed in the future. Total costs to the company related to these lawsuits and claims are not currently determinable. ChevronTexaco continues the use of MTBE in gasoline it sells in certain areas. The state of California had directed that MTBE be phased out of the manufacturing process by the end of 2002. In March 2002, the governor of California postponed the phase out of MTBE in California until the end of 2003.

The company is subject to loss contingencies pursuant to environmental laws and regulations that in the future may require the company to take action to correct or ameliorate the effects on the environment of prior release of chemicals or petroleum substances, including MTBE, by the company or other parties. Such contingencies may exist for various sites including, but not limited to: Superfund sites and refineries, oil fields, service stations, terminals, and land development areas, whether operating, closed or sold.

See “Environmental Matters” on page FS-10 for comments related to uncertainties connected with environmental cost estimates and financial exposures.

At year-end 2001, the projected benefit obligations exceeded the value of the assets in the company’s combined U.S. pension plans by $780 million. If investment returns are insufficient to offset increases in the plan’s obligations, pension expense may increase and additional funding may be required.

The U.S. federal income tax liabilities have been settled through 1993 for Chevron and Caltex and through 1991 for Texaco. California franchise tax liabilities have been settled through 1991 for Chevron and through 1987 for Texaco. Settlement of open tax years, as well as tax issues in other countries where the company conducts its businesses, is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the company and, in the opinion of management, adequate provision has been made for income and franchise taxes for all years under examination or subject to future examination.

The company’s operations, particularly exploration and production, can be affected by other changing economic, regulatory and political environments in the various countries in which it operates, including the United States. In certain locations, host governments have imposed restrictions, controls and taxes, and in others, political conditions have existed that may threaten the safety of employees and the company’s continued presence in those countries. Internal unrest or strained relations between a host government and the company or other governments may affect the company’s operations. Those developments have, at times, significantly affected the company’s related operations and results and are carefully considered by management when evaluating the level of current and future activity in such countries.

For oil and gas producing operations, ownership agreements may provide for periodic reassessments of equity interests in estimated oil and gas reserves. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses that could be material to earnings in any given period. One such equity redetermination process has been under way since 1996 for ChevronTexaco’s interests in four producing zones at the Naval Petroleum Reserve at Elk Hills in California, for the time when the remaining interests in these zones were owned by the U.S. Department of Energy. A wide range of estimates exist for a possible net settlement amount for the four zones. ChevronTexaco currently estimates its maximum possible net before-tax liability at less than $400 million. At the same time, a possible maximum net amount that could be owed to ChevronTexaco is estimated at more than $200 million. The timing of the settlement and the exact amount within this range of estimates are uncertain.

Areas in which the company and its affiliates have major operations include the United States of America, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Kuwait, Republic of Congo, Angola, Nigeria, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, China, Thailand, Venezuela, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Trinidad, Korea, the Philippines, Singapore and South Africa. The company’s Tengizchevroil affiliate operates in Kazakhstan. The company’s CPChem affiliate manufactures and markets a wide range of petrochemicals and plastics on a worldwide basis, with manufacturing facilities in existence or under construction in the United States, Puerto Rico, Singapore, China, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Mexico and Belgium. The company’s Dynegy affiliate has operations in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and other European countries.

ChevronTexaco receives claims from, and submits claims to, customers, trading partners, U.S. federal, state and local regulatory bodies, host governments, contractors, insurers and suppliers. The amounts of these claims, individually and in the aggregate, may be significant and may take lengthy periods to resolve.

The company and its affiliates also continue to review and analyze their operations and may close, abandon, sell, exchange, acquire or restructure assets to achieve operational or strategic benefits and to improve competitiveness and profitability. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses in future periods.

FS-12 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES In December 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a statement addressing selection and disclosure by public companies of “critical accounting policies and practices.” In the statement, the SEC encouraged inclusion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) commentary as to “the likelihood of materially different reported results if different assumptions or conditions were to prevail” in the application of these critical accounting policies.

The accompanying ChevronTexaco consolidated financial statements and supplementary information were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). Significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Inherent in the application of many of these accounting policies is the need for management to make estimates and judgments in the determination of certain revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. As such, materially different financial results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. Differences have occurred in the past with respect to a few critical accounting policies, as follows:

Successful Efforts Method of Oil and Gas Accounting Among other things, this accounting principle requires that capitalized costs for producing properties be amortized on the basis of crude oil and natural gas reserve quantities. The reserve estimates are determined in accordance with earth science and petroleum engineering principles and practices – and can vary as a result of changes in such factors as forecasted oil and gas prices, reservoir performance and oil field technology.

Downward revision in reserve estimates (on a field basis in North America; by concession or country in other producing areas) can result in either: (a) higher depreciation and depletion expense per barrel in future periods, or (b) an immediate write-down of the asset’s book value in accordance with accounting rules for the impairment of properties. The latter condition would result if the downward revisions were so significant that the estimated future cash flows from the remaining reserves in the field were insufficient to recover the unamortized capitalized costs. Conversely, if the oil and gas reserve quantities were revised upward, future per-barrel depreciation and depletion expense would be lower.

The application of successful efforts accounting can also cause material fluctuations between periods in exploration expense if drilling results are different than expected or if the company changes its exploration and development plans. The determination that exploratory drilling was unsuccessful in finding economically producible reserves requires the immediate expensing of previously capitalized drilling costs.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets In addition to oil and gas assets that could become impaired under the application of successful efforts accounting, other assets could become impaired and require write-down if circumstances warrant. Conditions that could cause an asset to become impaired include lower-than-forecasted commodity sales prices, changes in the company’s business plans or a significant adverse change in the local or national business climate. The amount of an impairment charge would be based on estimates of an asset’s fair value compared with its book value.

Environmental Remediation and Litigation Reserve Estimation Management also makes judgments and estimates in recording liabilities for environmental cleanup and litigation. Liabilities for environmental remediation are subject to change because of matters such as changes in laws, regulations and their interpretation; the determination of additional information on the extent and nature of site contamination; and improvements in technology. Likewise, actual litigation costs can vary from estimates based on the facts and circumstance and application of laws in individual cases.

Income Tax Accounting The computation of the company’s income tax expense requires the interpretation of complex tax laws and regulations in many taxing jurisdictions around the world; the determination of expected outcomes from pending litigation; and the assessment of audit findings that are performed by numerous taxing authorities. Actual income tax expense can differ significantly from management’s estimates.

The above assessment of critical accounting policies is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the uncertainties to financial results that can occur from the application of the full range of the company’s accounting policies. Materially different financial results could occur in the application of other accounting policies as well. Likewise, materially different results can occur upon the adoption of new accounting standards promulgated by the various rule-making bodies.

Other contingencies are discussed in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The status of pending litigation and other information is included in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Information on contingencies and litigation is also addressed on page FS-11.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (FAS 133), as amended by FAS 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” effective January 1, 2001. The adoption of FAS 133 and FAS 138 did not have a significant impact on the company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Recent interpretations of FAS 133 and FAS 138 by the FASB Derivatives Implementation Group prescribe mark-to-market accounting for certain natural gas sales contracts. Some of these interpretations became effective January 1, 2002. Adoption at that time did not result in a material effect to earnings. The effect of subsequent changes in the contracts’ fair values is uncertain.

In September 2000, the FASB issued Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities – A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125” (FAS 140). FAS 140 is effective for transfers occurring after March 31, 2001, and for disclosures relating to securitization transactions and collateral for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2000. Adoption of FAS 140 had no significant effect on ChevronTexaco’s accounting or disclosures for the types of transactions in the scope of the new standard.

In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations” (FAS 141), Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142) and Statement No. 143,

FS-13 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (FAS 143). FAS 141 is effective for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, and for all business combinations accounted for using the purchase method for which the date of acquisition is July 1, 2001, or later. FAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, except for goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001, which were immediately subject to the amortization and nonamortization provisions of the Statement. FAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Adoption of FAS 141 will have no effect on the company’s pooling-of-interests method of accounting for the Texaco merger transaction, but will affect future transactions. Similarly, adoption of FAS 142 may affect future transactions, but is not expected to have an effect on the company’s prior business combinations. FAS 143 differs in several significant respects from current accounting for asset retirement obligations under FAS 19, “Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies.” Adoption of FAS 143 will affect future accounting and reporting of the assets, liabilities and expenses related to these obligations. The magnitude of the effect has not yet been determined.

In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (FAS 144). FAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, with initial application effective as of the beginning of the fiscal year adopted. Adoption of FAS 144 will not affect assets classified as held for disposal as a result of disposal activities that were initiated prior to its initial application, but may affect future disposals.

FS-14 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 14 (a)(1) on page 25 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ChevronTexaco Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 14(a)(2) on page 25 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. The consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the merger of Texaco Inc. on October 9, 2001, in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests, as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. We did not audit the financial statements or financial statement schedule of Texaco Inc., which statements reflect total assets of $30,867 million as of December 31, 2000, and total revenues of $51,130 million and $35,691 million for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000. Those statements and schedule were audited by other auditors whose report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Texaco Inc., is based solely on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP San Francisco, California March 8, 2002

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Shareholders, Texaco Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Texaco Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiary companies as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements (not presented separately herein) are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above (not presented separately herein) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Texaco Inc. and subsidiary companies as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in Item 14 on Texaco Inc.’s 2000 Form 10-K (not presented separately herein) is the responsibility of the Company’s management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

February 22, 2001 New York, New York

FS-15 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Income 1

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000		1999
REVENUES AND OTHER INCOME
Sales and other operating revenues 2	$ 104,409	$	117,095	$ 84,004
Income from equity affiliates	1,144		1,077	896
Other income	692		958	813
TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER INCOME	106,245		119,130	85,713
COSTS AND OTHER DEDUCTIONS
Purchased crude oil and products	60,549		69,814	46,256
Operating expenses	7,650		8,323	7,773
Selling, general and administrative expenses	3,984		3,626	3,222
Exploration expenses	1,039		949	1,072
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	7,059		5,321	4,934
Merger-related expenses	1,563		—	—
Interest and debt expense	833		1,110	1,132
Taxes
other than on income 2	15,156		15,827	15,441
Minority interests	121		111	71
TOTAL COSTS AND OTHER DEDUCTIONS	97,954		105,081	79,901
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE	8,291		14,049	5,812
INCOME TAX EXPENSE	4,360		6,322	2,565
NET INCOME BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM	$ 3,931	$	7,727	$ 3,247
Extraordinary loss, net of income tax	(643	)	—	—
NET INCOME	$ 3,288	$	7,727	$ 3,247
PER-SHARE AMOUNTS
NET INCOME BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM – BASIC	$ 3.71	$	7.23	$ 3.01
– DILUTED	$ 3.70	$	7.21	$ 3.00
NET INCOME – BASIC	$ 3.10	$	7.23	$ 3.01
– DILUTED	$ 3.09	$	7.21	$ 3.00
1 2000 and 1999 include certain reclassifications to
conform to 2001 presentation
2 Includes consumer excise taxes:	$ 6,546	$	6,601	$ 6,029

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION

Management of ChevronTexaco is responsible for preparing the accompanying financial statements and for ensuring their integrity and objectivity. The statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and fairly represent the transactions and financial position of the company. The financial statements include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.

The company’s statements have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, selected by the Audit Committee and approved by the stockholders. Management has made available to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP all the company’s financial records and related data, as well as the minutes of stockholders’ and directors’ meetings.

Management of the company has established and maintains a system of internal accounting controls that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with management’s authorization, and the books and records accurately reflect the disposition of assets. The system of internal controls includes appropriate division of responsibility. The company maintains an internal audit department that conducts an extensive program of internal audits and independently assesses the effectiveness of the internal controls.

The Audit Committee is composed of directors who are not officers or employees of the company. It meets regularly with members of management, the internal auditors and the independent accountants to discuss the adequacy of the company’s internal controls, its financial statements, and the nature, extent and results of the audit effort. Both the internal auditors and the independent accountants have free and direct access to the Audit Committee without the presence of management.

/s/ David J. O’Reilly DAVID J. O’REILLY Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer /s/ John S. Watson JOHN S. WATSON Vice President and Chief Financial Officer /s/ Stephen J. Crowe STEPHEN J. CROWE Vice President and Comptroller

March 8, 2002

FS-16 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

Millions of dollars	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000		1999
NET INCOME	$ 3,288	$	7,727	$	3,247
Unrealized holding gain on securities
Net gain arising during period
Before income taxes	3		87		72
Income taxes	—		(30	)	(33	)
Reclassification to net income of net realized gain
Before income taxes	—		(154	)	(48	)
Income taxes	—		54		11
Total	3		(43	)	2
Net derivatives gain on hedge transactions	3		—		—
Minimum pension liability adjustment
Before income taxes	14		(28	)	(15	)
Income taxes	(5	)	9		5
Total	9		(19	)	(10	)
Currency translation adjustment
Unrealized net change arising during period	(11	)	(14	)	(21	)
Reclassification adjustment to net income for sale of
investment in affiliate	—		—		(14	)
Total	(11	)	(14	)	(35	)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE GAIN (LOSS), NET OF TAX	4		(76	)	(43	)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$ 3,292	$	7,651	$	3,204

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-17 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheet

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts	At December 31 — 2001	2000
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 2,117	$	2,328
Marketable securities	1,033		913
Accounts and notes receivable (less allowance: 2001 - $152; 2000 - $116)	8,279		10,763
Inventories:
Crude oil and petroleum products	2,207		1,969
Chemicals	209		200
Materials, supplies and other	532		485
	2,948		2,654
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,769		1,255
Assets held for sale – merger related	2,181		—
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS	18,327		17,913
Long-term receivables, net	1,225		1,218
Investments and advances	12,252		11,764
Properties, plant and equipment, at cost	99,943		95,568
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization	56,710		51,249
	43,233		44,319
Deferred charges and other assets	2,535		2,407
TOTAL ASSETS	$ 77,572	$	77,621
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Short-term debt	$ 8,429	$	3,094
Accounts payable	6,427		7,563
Accrued liabilities	3,399		3,014
Federal and other taxes on income	1,398		1,864
Other taxes payable	1,001		1,126
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	20,654		16,661
Long-term debt	8,704		12,494
Capital lease obligations	285		327
Deferred credits and other noncurrent obligations	4,394		4,303
Noncurrent deferred income taxes	6,132		6,687
Reserves for employee benefit plans	3,162		3,034
Minority interests	283		746
TOTAL LIABILITIES	43,614		44,252
Preferred stock (authorized 100,000,000 shares, $1.00 par value, none issued)	—		—
Market Auction Preferred Shares (authorized 30,000,000 shares, $1.00 par value,
1,200 issued, liquidation preference of $250,000 per share)	—		300
Common stock (authorized 4,000,000,000 shares, $0.75 par value; 1,137,021,057 shares
issued at December 31, 2001; 1,149,520,976 shares issued at December 31, 2000)	853		862
Capital in excess of par value	4,811		5,505
Retained earnings	32,767		32,206
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(306	)	(310	)
Deferred compensation and benefit plan trust	(752	)	(921	)
Treasury stock, at cost (2001 - 69,800,315 shares; 2000 - 84,835,000 shares)	(3,415	)	(4,273	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	33,958		33,369
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$ 77,572	$	77,621

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-18 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

Millions of dollars	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000		1999
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 3,288	$	7,727	$	3,247
Adjustments
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	7,059		5,321		4,934
Dry hole expense	646		462		583
Distributions less than income from equity affiliates	(489	)	(26	)	(288	)
Net before-tax gains on asset retirements and sales	(116	)	(371	)	(542	)
Net foreign currency (gains) losses	(122	)	(130	)	58
Deferred income tax (credits) charges	(768	)	521		23
Extraordinary before-tax loss on merger-related asset dispositions	787		—		—
Net decrease in operating working capital	643		91		266
Minority interest in net income	121		111		68
Decrease in Cities Service provision	—		—		(149	)
Cash settlement of Cities Service litigation	—		—		(775	)
Other, net	408		(239	)	346
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	11,457		13,467		7,771
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	(9,713	)	(7,629	)	(7,895	)
Proceeds from asset sales	298		1,229		1,578
Net (purchases) sales of marketable securities	(183	)	80		597
Net sales (purchases) of other short-term investments	56		(84	)	—
Collection of note/formation payments from U.S. affiliate	—		—		101
Distribution from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC	—		835		—
Other, net	—		(73	)	9
NET CASH USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES	(9,542	)	(5,642	)	(5,610	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net borrowings (repayments) of short-term obligations	3,830		(3,254	)	542
Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt	412		1,293		2,383
Repayments of long-term debt and other financing obligations	(2,856	)	(1,241	)	(1,491	)
Redemption of Market Auction Preferred Shares	(300	)	—		—
Redemption of subsidiary preferred stock	(463	)	—		—
Issuance of preferred stock by subsidiaries	12		—		—
Dividends paid
Common stock	(2,733	)	(2,664	)	(2,589	)
Preferred stock	(6	)	(15	)	(28	)
Dividends paid to minority interests	(119	)	(110	)	(55	)
Net sales (purchases) of treasury shares	128		(1,498	)	108
NET CASH USED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES	(2,095	)	(7,489	)	(1,130	)
EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES
ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(31	)	(5	)	(30	)
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(211	)	331		1,001
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR	2,328		1,997		996
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT YEAR – END	$ 2,117	$	2,328	$	1,997

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FS-19 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

Shares in thousands; amounts in millions of dollars	2001 — Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount	Shares		Amount
PREFERRED STOCK	—	$	—		—	$ —		—	$	—
MARKET AUCTION PREFERRED SHARES
Balance at January 1	1	$	300		—	$ —		—	$	—
Redemptions	(1	)	(300	)	—	—		—		—
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31	—	$	—		1	$ 300		1	$	300
SERIES B ESOP CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
Balance at January 1	—	$	—		—	$ —		649	$	389
Redemptions	—		—		—	—		(587	)	(352	)
Retirements	—		—		—	—		(62	)	(37	)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31	—	$	—		—	$ —		—	$	—
SERIES F ESOP CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
Balance at January 1	—	$	—		—	$ —		53	$	39
Redemptions	—		—		—	—		(53	)	(39	)
Retirements	—		—		—	—		—		—
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31	—	$	—		—	$ —		—	$	—
COMMON STOCK
Balance at January 1	1,149,521	$	862		1,149,521	$ 1,724		1,149,544	$	1,724
Retirement of Texaco treasury stock	(12,500	)	(9	)	—	—		—		—
Change in par value	—		—		—	(862	)	—		—
Monterey Resources acquisition adjustment	—		—		—	—		(23	)	—
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31	1,137,021	$	853		1,149,521	$ 862		1,149,521	$	1,724
CAPITAL IN EXCESS OF PAR
Balance at January 1		$	5,505			$ 4,621			$	4,856
Retirement of Texaco treasury stock			(739	)		—				—
Change in common stock par value			—			862				—
Redemption of Texaco Series B and Series F ESOP convertible preferred stock			—			—				(308	)
Monterey Resources acquisition adjustment			—			—				(2	)
Treasury stock transactions			45			22				75
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31		$	4,811			$ 5,505			$	4,621
RETAINED EARNINGS
Balance at January 1		$	32,206			$ 27,148			$	26,503
Net income			3,288			7,727				3,247
Cash dividends
Common stock			(2,733	)		(2,664	)			(2,589	)
Preferred stock
Texaco Series B ESOP convertible preferred stock			—			—				(17	)
Texaco Series F ESOP convertible preferred stock			—			—				(2	)
Market Auction Preferred Shares			(6	)		(17	)			(9	)
Tax benefit from dividends paid on
unallocated ESOP shares and other			12			12				15
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31		$	32,767			$ 32,206			$	27,148

FS-20 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity – Continued

Shares in thousands; amounts in millions of dollars	Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Currency translation adjustment
Balance at January 1		$	(212	)		$	(198	)		$	(163	)
Change during year			(11	)			(14	)			(35	)
Balance at December 31		$	(223	)		$	(212	)		$	(198	)
Minimum pension liability adjustment
Balance at January 1		$	(100	)		$	(81	)		$	(71	)
Change during year			9				(19	)			(10	)
Balance at December 31		$	(91	)		$	(100	)		$	(81	)
Unrealized net holding gain on securities
Balance at January 1		$	2			$	45			$	43
Change during year			3				(43	)			2
Balance at December 31		$	5			$	2			$	45
Net derivatives gain on hedge transactions
Balance at January 1		$	—			$	—			$	—
Change during year			3				—				—
Balance at December 31		$	3			$	—			$	—
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31		$	(306	)		$	(310	)		$	(234	)
DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT PLAN TRUST
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
Balance at January 1		$	(681	)		$	(712	)		$	(785	)
Net reduction of ESOP debt and other			106				35				45
Restricted stock
Awards			(35	)			(30	)			(18	)
Amortization and other			12				26				46
Vesting upon merger			86				—				—
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31			(512	)			(681	)			(712	)
BENEFIT PLAN TRUST (COMMON STOCK)	7,084		(240	)	7,084		(240	)	7,084		(240	)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31	7,084	$	(752	)	7,084	$	(921	)	7,084	$	(952	)
TREASURY STOCK AT COST
Balance at January 1	84,835	$	(4,273	)	67,282	$	(2,816	)	84,853	$	(3,728	)
Purchases	141		(9	)	19,517		(1,580	)	56		(5	)
Retirement of Texaco treasury stock	(12,500	)	748		—		—		—		—
Redemption of Texaco Series B and Series F
ESOP convertible stock	—		—		—		—		(12,459	)	699
Other — mainly employee benefit plans	(2,676	)	119		(1,964	)	123		(5,168	)	218
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31	69,800	$	(3,415	)	84,835	$	(4,273	)	67,282	$	(2,816	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AT DECEMBER 31		$	33,958			$	33,369			$	29,791

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FS-21 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation – Merger of Chevron and Texaco On October 9, 2001, Texaco Inc. (Texaco) became a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation (Chevron) pursuant to a merger transaction, and Chevron changed its name to ChevronTexaco Corporation. The combination was accounted for as a pooling of interests.

These Consolidated Financial Statements give retroactive effect to the merger, with all periods presented as if Chevron and Texaco had always been combined. Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the separate presentations of Chevron and Texaco. The reclassifications had no impact on the amount of net income or stockholders’ equity.

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of all majority-owned, controlled subsidiaries after the elimination of significant intercompany accounts and transactions. Included in the consolidation are the accounts of the Caltex Group of Companies (Caltex) – a joint venture, owned 50 percent each by Chevron and Texaco prior to the merger and accounted for under the equity method by both companies.

General ChevronTexaco manages its investments in, and provides administrative, financial and management support to, U.S. and foreign subsidiaries and affiliates that engage in fully integrated petroleum operations, chemicals operations and coal mining activities. In addition, ChevronTexaco holds investments in power generation and gasification businesses. Collectively, these companies operate in approximately 180 countries. Petroleum operations consist of exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas; refining crude oil into finished petroleum products; marketing crude oil, natural gas and the many products derived from petroleum; and transporting crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products by pipelines, marine vessels, motor equipment and rail car. Chemicals operations include the manufacture and marketing of commodity petrochemicals, plastics for industrial uses and fuel and lube oil additives.

In preparing its Consolidated Financial Statements, the company follows accounting policies that are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. This requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements, as well as amounts included in the notes thereto, including discussion and disclosure of contingent liabilities. While the company uses its best estimates and judgments, actual results could differ from these estimates as future confirming events occur.

The nature of the company’s operations and the many countries in which it operates subject it to changing economic, regulatory and political conditions. The company does not believe it is vulnerable to the risk of near-term severe impact as a result of any concentration of its activities.

Subsidiary and Affiliated Companies The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of controlled subsidiary companies more than 50 percent owned. Investments in and advances to affiliates in which the company has a substantial ownership interest of approximately 20 percent to 50 percent, or for which the company exercises significant influence but not control over policy decisions are accounted for by the equity method, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” Under this accounting, remaining unamortized cost is increased or decreased by the company’s share of earnings or losses after dividends. Gains and losses that arise from the issuance of stock by an affiliate that results in changes in the company’s proportionate share of the dollar amount of the affiliate’s equity are recognized currently in income. Deferred income taxes are provided for these gains and losses.

Derivatives The majority of the company’s activity in commodity derivative instruments is intended to manage the price risk posed by physical transactions. For some of this derivative activity, generally limited to large, discrete or infrequently occurring transactions, the company may elect to apply fair value or cash flow hedge accounting. For other similar derivative instruments, generally because of the short-term nature of the contracts and their limited use, the company has elected not to apply hedge accounting, and changes in the fair value of those contracts are reflected in current income. For the company’s trading activity, gains and losses from the derivative instruments are reported in current income. For derivative instruments relating to foreign currency exposures, gains and losses are reported in current income. Interest rate swaps – hedging a portion of the company’s fixed rate debt – are accounted for as fair value hedges, whereas interest rate swaps relating to a portion of the company’s floating-rate debt are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income.

Short-Term Investments All short-term investments are classified as available for sale and are in highly liquid debt or equity securities. Those investments that are part of the company’s cash management portfolio with original maturities of three months or less are reported as “Cash equivalents.” The balance of the short-term investments is reported as “Marketable securities.” Short-term investments are marked-to-market with any unrealized gains or losses included in other comprehensive income.

Inventories Crude oil, petroleum products and chemicals are generally stated at cost, using a Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method. In the aggregate, these costs are below market. Materials, supplies and other inventories generally are stated at average cost.

Properties, Plant and Equipment The successful efforts method is used for oil and gas exploration and production activities. All costs for development wells, related plant and equipment, and proved mineral interests in oil and gas properties are capitalized. Costs of exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether the wells found proved reserves. Costs of wells that are assigned proved reserves remain capitalized. Costs also are capitalized for wells that find commercially producible reserves that cannot be classified as proved, pending one or more of the following: (1) decisions on additional major capital expenditures, (2) the results of additional

FS-22 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued

exploratory wells that are under way or firmly planned, and (3) securing final regulatory approvals for development. Otherwise, well costs are expensed if a determination as to whether proved reserves were found cannot be made within one year following completion of drilling. All other exploratory wells and costs are expensed.

Long-lived assets, including proved oil and gas properties, are assessed for possible impairment by comparing their carrying values with the undiscounted future net before-tax cash flows. Impaired assets are written down to their estimated fair values, generally their discounted future net before-tax cash flows. For proved oil and gas properties in the United States, the company generally performs the impairment review on an individual field basis. Outside the United States, reviews are performed on a country or concession basis. Impairment amounts are recorded as incremental depreciation expense in the period in which the event occurs.

Depreciation and depletion (including provisions for future abandonment and restoration costs) of all capitalized costs of proved oil and gas producing properties, except mineral interests, are expensed using the unit-of-production method by individual field as the proved developed reserves are produced. Depletion expenses for capitalized costs of proved mineral interests are recognized using the unit-of-production method by individual fields as the related proved reserves are produced. Periodic valuation provisions for impairment of capitalized costs of unproved mineral interests are expensed.

Depreciation and depletion expenses for coal are determined using the unit-of-production method as the proved reserves are produced. The capitalized costs of all other plant and equipment are depreciated or amortized over their estimated useful lives. In general, the declining-balance method is used to depreciate plant and equipment in the United States; the straight-line method generally is used to depreciate international plant and equipment and to amortize all capitalized leased assets.

Gains or losses are not recognized for normal retirements of properties, plant and equipment subject to composite group amortization or depreciation. Gains or losses from abnormal retirements are recorded as expenses and from sales as Other income.

Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and minor renewals to maintain facilities in operating condition are generally expensed as incurred. Major replacements and renewals are capitalized.

Environmental Expenditures Environmental expenditures that relate to ongoing operations or to conditions caused by past operations are expensed. Expenditures that create future benefits or contribute to future revenue generation are capitalized.

Liabilities related to future remediation costs are recorded when environmental assessments and/or cleanups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Other than for assessments, the timing and magnitude of these accruals are generally based on the company’s commitment to a formal plan of action, such as an approved remediation plan or the sale or disposal of an asset. For the company’s U.S. and Canadian marketing facilities, the accrual is based on the probability that a future remediation commitment will be required. For oil, gas and coal producing properties, a provision is made through depreciation expense for anticipated abandonment and restoration costs at the end of a property’s useful life.

For Superfund sites, the company records a liability for its share of costs when it has been named as a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) and when an assessment or cleanup plan has been developed. This liability includes the company’s own portion of the costs and also the company’s portion of amounts for other PRPs when it is probable that they will not be able to pay their share of the cleanup obligation.

The company records the gross amount of its liability based on its best estimate of future costs using currently available technology and applying current regulations as well as the company’s own internal environmental policies. Future amounts are not discounted. Recoveries or reimbursements are recorded as assets when receipt is reasonably assured.

Currency Translation The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for substantially all of the company’s consolidated operations and those of its equity affiliates. For those operations, all gains or losses from currency translations are currently included in income. The cumulative translation effects for those few entities, both consolidated and affiliated, using functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar are included in the currency translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity.

Revenue Recognition Revenues associated with sales of crude oil, natural gas, coal, petroleum and chemicals products and all other sources are recorded when title passes to the customer, net of royalties, discounts and allowances, as applicable. Revenues from natural gas production from properties in which ChevronTexaco has an interest with other producers are generally recognized on the basis of the company’s net working interest (entitlement method).

Stock Compensation The company applies Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for stock options, and presents in Note 21 pro forma net income and earnings per share data as if the accounting prescribed by FAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” had been applied.

NOTE 2. TEXACO MERGER TRANSACTION

The following table presents summarized financial data for the combined company for periods prior to the merger.

	Nine months ended — September 30	December 31
Millions of dollars	2001	2000		1999
Revenues and other income
Chevron	$ 37,213	$	52,129	$ 36,586
Texaco 1	39,469		53,520	37,779
Adjustments/eliminations 2	8,103		13,481	11,348
ChevronTexaco	$ 84,785	$	119,130	$ 85,713
Net Income
Chevron	$ 4,092	$	5,185	$ 2,070
Texaco 1	2,214		2,542	1,177
Net income, before
extraordinary item	$ 6,306	$	7,727	$ 3,247
Extraordinary loss
net of income tax 3	(496	)	—	—
ChevronTexaco	$ 5,810	$	7,727	$ 3,247

| 1 | Includes certain reclassification adjustments to conform to historic Chevron
presentation. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Consolidation of former equity operations and intercompany eliminations. |
| 3 | Represents loss associated with the sale of the company’s interest in Equilon
and Motiva. |

FS-23 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 2. TEXACO MERGER TRANSACTION – Continued

At the time of the merger, each share of Texaco common stock was converted, on a tax-free basis, into the right to receive 0.77 shares of ChevronTexaco common stock. Approximately 425 million additional shares of common stock were issued, representing about 40 percent of the outstanding ChevronTexaco common stock after the merger.

As a condition of approving the merger, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) required the divestment of certain Texaco assets: Texaco’s investments in its U.S. refining, marketing and transportation affiliates, Equilon Enterprises LLC (Equilon) and Motiva Enterprises LLC (Motiva), as well as other interests in U.S. natural gas processing and transportation facilities and general aviation fuel marketing.

Also at the time of the merger, Texaco placed its interests in Equilon and Motiva in trust, as required by the FTC. Because the company no longer exercised significant influence over these investments, the associated accounting method was changed from equity to the cost basis.

NOTE 3. EXTRAORDINARY ITEM

Net income for 2001 included a loss of $643, net of a tax benefit of $144, ($0.61 per common share – diluted), related to the disposition of assets that were required as a condition of the FTC approval of the merger and other assets that were made duplicative by the merger. The after-tax loss on these dispositions was reported as an extraordinary item in accordance with pooling-of-interests accounting requirements.

Included in the total after-tax loss was a loss of $564 connected with the sale of interests in Equilon and Motiva. Proceeds from the sale, which closed in February 2002, were approximately $2,200.

For both assets that were being sold by order of the FTC and other assets that were being disposed of because they were made duplicative by the merger, the total net book value at year-end 2001 was $2,181. This amount was included in “Current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Assets held for sale - merger related.” Net income for 2001 associated with all such assets being sold as a result of the merger was approximately $375.

NOTE 4. EMPLOYEE TERMINATION BENEFITS AND OTHER RESTRUCTURING COSTS

The company recorded before-tax charges of $1,563 in 2001 for merger-related expenses, which included: employee severance benefits; incremental pension and medical plan costs associated with work force reductions; legal, accounting, SEC filing and investment banker fees; employee and office relocations; and costs for the elimination of redundant facilities and operations.

Included in the 2001 charges were accruals of $891 for employee termination benefits for approximately 4,500 employees and other merger-related expenses that would not benefit future periods. Payments against these accruals during the year were $105. Approximately 1,400 employees had terminated by year-end. The year-end accrual balance of $786 is expected to be mostly extinguished by early 2003, as certain terminating employees are eligible to delay their separation payments one year or more. At year-end 2001, approximately $275 of the accrual balance was classified as long term.

Accrual balances for pre-merger restructuring costs had all been extinguished before the end of 2001.

NOTE 5. SPECIAL ITEMS, MERGER EFFECTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Net income is affected by transactions that are unrelated to or are not necessarily representative of the company’s ongoing operations for the periods presented. These transactions, defined by management and designated “special items, merger effects and extraordinary items,” can obscure the underlying results of operations for a year as well as affect comparability of results between years.

Listed in the following table are categories of these items and their net increase (decrease) to net income, after related tax effects.

	Year ended December 31 — 2001		2000		1999
Special Items
Asset write-offs and revaluations
Exploration and production
Impairments – U.S.	$ (1,168	)	$ (176	)	$ (204	)
– International	(247	)	—		—
Refining, marketing and transportation
Impairments – U.S.	—		—		(76	)
– International	(46	)	(112	)	—
Chemicals
Manufacturing facility
impairment – U.S.	(32	)	(90	)	—
Other asset write-offs	(64	)	—		(43	)
All other
Mining asset write-off	(152	)	—		—
Information technology and
other assets	—		—		(54	)
	(1,709	)	(378	)	(377	)
Asset dispositions, net
Oil and gas assets – U.S.	49		(107	)	—
Oil and gas assets – International	—		80		—
Real estate and other	—		99		87
Pipeline interests	—		—		75
Coal assets	—		—		60
Equity affiliate interest – Japan	—		—		(111	)
	49		72		111
Prior-year tax adjustments	(5	)	107		228
Environmental remediation provisions, net	(78	)	(264	)	(40	)
Pre-merger restructurings and
reorganizations	—		—		(257	)
Other, net
Dynegy equity adjustment	—		77		—
Litigation and regulatory issues	—		(62	)	104
Tax benefits on asset sales	—		70		40
	—		85		144
Total special items	$ (1,743	)	$ (378	)	$ (191	)
Merger Effects
Merger-related expenses	(1,136	)	—		—
Extraordinary loss on merger-related
asset sales	(643	)	—		—
Total special items and merger effects	$ (3,522	)	$ (378	)	$ (191	)

FS-24 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 5. SPECIAL ITEMS, MERGER EFFECTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION – Continued

In accordance with its policy, the company recorded impairments of assets to be held and used when changes in circumstances – primarily related to lower oil and gas prices, downward revisions of reserves and changes in the use of the assets – indicated that the carrying values of the assets could not be recovered through estimated future before-tax undiscounted cash flows. 2001 included a $1,022 impairment of the Midway Sunset Field in California – the result of a write-down in proved oil reserve quantities – upon determination of a lower-than-projected oil recovery from the field’s steam injection process. There was also a $247 impairment of the LL-652 Field in Venezuela in 2001 – as slower-than-expected reservoir repressurization resulted in a reduction in the projected volumes of oil recoverable during the company’s remaining contract period of operation. Asset impairments included in “Asset write-offs and revaluations” were for assets held for use, except for U.S. coal assets in 1999. In late 1999, these assets were reclassified to “held for use” upon cessation of negotiations with potential buyers.

The aggregate income statement effects from special items are reflected in the following table, including ChevronTexaco’s proportionate share of special items related to equity affiliates.

	Year ended December 31 — 2001		2000		1999
Revenues and other income
Income from equity affiliates	$ (123	)	$ (141	)	$ (212	)
Other income	84		356		318
Total revenues and other income	(39	)	215		106
Costs and other deductions
Operating expenses	25		394		280
Selling, general and administrative
expenses	139		94		(81	)
Exploration expenses	—		—		1
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization	2,294		561		397
Merger-related expenses	1,563		—		—
Taxes other than on income	12		—		—
Interest and debt expense	—		4		—
Minority interest	—		(9	)	—
Total costs and other deductions	4,033		1,044		597
Income before income tax expense	(4,072	)	(829	)	(491	)
Income tax expense	(1,193	)	(451	)	(300	)
Net income before
extraordinary item	$ (2,879	)	$ (378	)	$ (191	)
Extraordinary loss, net of income tax	(643	)	—		—
Net income	$ (3,522	)	$ (378	)	$ (191	)

Other financial information is as follows:

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000	1999
Total financing interest and debt costs	$ 955	$ 1,218	$ 1,170
Less: capitalized interest	122	108	38
Interest and debt expense	$ 833	$ 1,110	$ 1,132
Research and development expenses	$ 209	$ 211	$ 226
Foreign currency gains (losses)*	$ 191	$ 182	$ (15	)

• Includes $12, $66 and $(32) in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, for the company’s share of equity affiliates’ foreign currency gains (losses).

The excess of market value over the carrying value of inventories for which the LIFO method is used was $1,580, $2,339 and $1,169 at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Market value is generally based on average acquisition costs for the year. In 2000, certain inventories were recorded at market, which was lower than LIFO carrying value. Adjustments to market reduced net income $4 in 2000. In 2001 and 1999, the market valuation adjustment reserves established in prior years were eliminated as market prices improved and the associated physical units of inventory were sold. Elimination of these reserves increased net income by $4 and $170 in 2001 and 1999, respectively.

NOTE 6. INFORMATION RELATING TO THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

“Net decrease in operating working capital” is composed of the following:

	Year ended December 31 — 2001		2000		1999
Decrease (increase) in accounts
and notes receivable	$ 2,472		$ (2,162	)	$ (2,057	)
(Increase) decrease in inventories	(294	)	120		32
(Increase) decrease in prepaid
expenses and other current assets	(211	)	73		(61	)
(Decrease) increase in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities	(742	)	1,327		1,718
(Decrease) increase in income and
other taxes payable	(582	)	733		634
Net decrease in operating
working capital	$ 643		$ 91		$ 266
Net cash provided by operating
activities includes the following cash
payments for interest and income taxes:
Interest paid on debt
(net of capitalized interest)	$ 873		$ 1,095		$ 1,060
Income taxes paid	$ 5,465		$ 4,883		$ 1,868
Net (purchases) sales of
marketable securities consists of
the following gross amounts:
Marketable securities purchased	$ (2,848	)	$ (6,671	)	$ (3,255	)
Marketable securities sold	2,665		6,751		3,852
Net (purchases) sales of marketable
securities	$ (183	)	$ 80		$ 597

The major components of “Capital expenditures” and the reconciliation of this amount to the capital and exploratory expenditures, excluding equity in affiliates, presented in the MD&A are detailed in the following table.

FS-25 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 6. INFORMATION RELATING TO THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS – Continued

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000		1999
Additions to properties, plant
and equipment 1	$ 6,445	$	6,173	$	8,125
Additions to investments	2,902	2	1,118		393
Current year dry-hole expenditures	418		402		475
Payments for other liabilities
and assets, net	(52	)	(64	)	(1,098	) 3
Capital expenditures	9,713		7,629		7,895
Expensed exploration expenditures	393		487		489
Payments of long-term debt and
other financing obligations, net	210	4	175		648	5
Capital and exploratory expenditures,
excluding equity affiliates	$ 10,316	$	8,291	$	9,032

1	2001 net of a noncash reclassification of $63.
2	Includes $1,500 for investment in Dynegy preferred stock.
3	Includes liabilities assumed in acquisitions of Rutherford-Moran Oil
Corporation and Petrolera Argentina San Jorge S.A.
4	Represents a deferred payment related to 1993 acquisition of an interest in
the Tengizchevroil joint venture.
5	Includes obligations assumed in acquisition of Rutherford-Moran Oil
Corporation and other capital lease additions.

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows excludes the following significant noncash transaction:

In 2000, Chevron contributed $2,800 of net noncash assets to Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC (CPChem). The investment is accounted for under the equity method.

NOTE 7. SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL DATA – CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (CUSA), is a major subsidiary of ChevronTexaco Corporation. CUSA owns, manages and operates on its own behalf or on behalf of other ChevronTexaco subsidiaries, the U.S. integrated petroleum operations, excluding ChevronTexaco’s investments in Equilon and Motiva, which were sold in February 2002, and most of the pipeline operations of ChevronTexaco. CUSA and its subsidiaries and affiliates manage and operate most of ChevronTexaco’s U.S. businesses and assets related to the exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids and also those associated with refining, marketing, supply and distribution of products derived from petroleum, other than natural gas liquids. CUSA also holds ChevronTexaco’s investment in CPChem. Summarized financial information for CUSA and its consolidated subsidiaries is presented below.

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000*	1999*
Sales and other operating revenues	$ 37,033	$ 40,729	$ 28,957
Total costs and other deductions	34,771	38,047	28,644
Net income	1,802	2,336	885

• Certain reclassifications were made to conform to the 2001 presentation.

	At December 31 — 2001	2000
Current assets	$ 2,888	$ 4,396
Other assets	20,795	20,738
Current liabilities	4,344	4,094
Other liabilities	9,797	10,251
Net equity	9,542	10,789
Memo: Total Debt	$ 6,272	$ 6,728

NOTE 8. SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL DATA – CHEVRON TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD.

Chevron Transport Corporation Ltd. (CTC), incorporated in the Bermuda Islands, is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of ChevronTexaco Corporation. CTC is the principal operator of ChevronTexaco’s international tanker fleet and is engaged in the marine transportation of oil and refined petroleum products. Most of CTC’s shipping revenue is derived by providing transportation services to other ChevronTexaco companies. ChevronTexaco Corporation has guaranteed this subsidiary’s obligations in connection with certain debt securities issued by a third party. Summarized financial information for CTC and its consolidated subsidiaries is presented as follows:

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000	1999
Sales and other operating revenues	$ 859	$ 728	$	504
Total costs and other deductions	793	777		572
Net income (loss)	67	(47	)	(50	)

	At December 31 — 2001	2000
Current assets	$ 196	$ 205
Other assets	527	530
Current liabilities	280	309
Other liabilities	311	361
Net equity	132	65

There were no restrictions on CTC’s ability to pay dividends or make loans or advances at December 31, 2001.

NOTE 9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Retained earnings at December 31, 2001 and 2000, included approximately $2,001 and $2,300, respectively, for the company’s share of undistributed earnings of equity affiliates. The interests in Equilon and Motiva were placed in trust at the time of the merger, and ChevronTexaco no longer had significant influence over the joint ventures. Accordingly, the method of accounting for these investments was changed in the fourth quarter 2001 from equity to cost basis.

Upon the merger of Chevron and Texaco, the authorized common stock of ChevronTexaco was increased from 2 billion shares of $0.75 par value to 4 billion shares of $0.75 par value. Under the terms of the merger agreement, approximately 425 million shares of ChevronTexaco common stock were issued in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of Texaco common stock based upon an exchange ratio of 0.77 of a ChevronTexaco share for each Texaco

FS-26 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY – Continued

share. Texaco’s common stock held in treasury was canceled at the effective time of the merger.

In 1998, in connection with the renewal of Chevron’s Stockholder Rights Plan, Chevron declared a dividend distribution on each outstanding share of its common stock of one Right to purchase participating preferred stock. Since this distribution in 1998, all newly issued shares of the corporation’s common stock have been accompanied by a preferred stock purchase Right, including the shares issued in connection with the merger between Chevron and Texaco. Following the merger, the Chevron Stockholder Rights Plan has continued as the Stockholder Rights plan of ChevronTexaco. The Rights issued under the plan become exercisable, unless redeemed earlier by ChevronTexaco, if a person or group acquires or obtains the right to acquire 10 percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock or commences a tender or exchange offer that would result in that person or group acquiring 10 percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, either event occurring without the prior consent of ChevronTexaco. The ChevronTexaco Series A Participating Preferred Stock that the holder of a Right is entitled to receive and the purchase price payable upon exercise of the ChevronTexaco Right are both subject to adjustment. The person or group who acquired 10 percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock without the prior consent of ChevronTexaco would not be entitled to this purchase.

The Rights will expire in November 2008, or they may be redeemed by the company at 1 cent per Right prior to that date. The Rights do not have voting or dividend rights and until they become exercisable, have no dilutive effect on the earnings per share of the company. Five million shares of the company’s preferred stock have been designated Series A Participating Preferred Stock and reserved for issuance upon exercise of the Rights. No event during 2001 made the Rights exercisable.

In 1989, Texaco established a similar stockholder rights plan and reserved and designated 3 million shares as Series D for issuance upon exercise of the Rights. Prior to the merger, the Rights were not exercisable nor did they become exercisable upon the merger. Immediately after the merger, the Texaco Rights and Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock were delisted and the Texaco stockholder rights plan was terminated.

During 2000 and until June 2001, there were 1,200 shares of Texaco cumulative variable rate preferred stock, called Market Auction Preferred Shares (MAPS), outstanding with an aggregate value of $300. The MAPS were redeemed in June 2001, at a liquidation preference of $250,000 per share, plus premium and accrued and unpaid dividends.

At December 31, 2001, 30 million shares of ChevronTexaco’s authorized but unissued common stock were reserved for issuance under the ChevronTexaco Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP), which was approved by the stockholders in 1990. To date, all of the plan’s common stock requirements have been met from the company’s treasury stock, and there have been no issuances of reserved shares.

NOTE 10. FINANCIAL AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Commodity Derivative Instruments ChevronTexaco is exposed to market risks related to price volatility of crude oil, refined products, natural gas and refinery feedstock.

The company uses derivative commodity instruments to manage this exposure on a small portion of its activity including: firm commitments and anticipated transactions for the purchase or sale of crude oil, feedstock purchases for company refineries, crude oil and refined products inventories, and fixed price contracts to sell natural gas and natural gas liquids.

The company also uses derivative commodity instruments for limited trading purposes.

The company maintains a policy of requiring that an International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreement govern derivative contracts with certain counterparties to mitigate credit risk. Depending on the nature of the derivative transaction, bilateral collateral arrangements may also be required. When the company is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and also has a legally enforceable master netting agreement with that counterparty, the “net” mark-to-market exposure represents the netting of the positive and negative exposures with that counterparty and a reasonable measure of the company’s credit risk. It is the company’s policy to use other master netting agreements with all counterparties with which it conducts significant transactions.

The fair values of the outstanding contracts are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Accounts and notes receivable,” “Accounts payable,” “Long-term receivables – net,” and “Deferred credits and other noncurrent obligations.” Gains and losses on the company’s risk management activities are reported as either “Sales and other operating revenues” or “Purchased crude oil and products,” whereas trading gains and losses are reported as “Other income.” These activities are reported under “Operating activities” in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

Foreign Currency The company enters into forward exchange contracts, generally with terms of 180 days or less, to manage some of its foreign currency exposures. These exposures include revenue and anticipated purchase transactions, including foreign currency capital expenditures and lease commitments, forecasted to occur within 180 days. The forward exchange contracts are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income.

The fair values of the outstanding contracts are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Accounts and notes receivable” or “Accounts payable,” with gains and losses reported as “Other income.” These activities are reported under “Operating activities” in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

Interest Rates The company enters into interest rate swaps as part of its overall strategy to manage the interest rate risk on its debt. Under the terms of the swaps, net cash settlements are based on the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to agreed notional principal amounts. Interest rate swaps related to a portion of the company’s fixed-rate debt are accounted for as fair value hedges, whereas interest rate swaps related to a portion of the company’s floating-rate debt are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with resulting gains and losses reflected in income.

FS-27 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 10. FINANCIAL AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS - Continued

During 2001, no new swaps were initiated in connection with debt issues in the year. At year-end 2001, the weighted average maturity of interest rate swaps was approximately five years.

Fair values of the interest rate swaps are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Accounts and notes receivables” or “Accounts payable,” with gains and losses reported directly in income as part of “Interest and debt expense.” These activities are reported under “Operating activities” in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

Concentrations of Credit Risk The company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of its cash equivalents, marketable securities, derivative financial instruments and trade receivables. The company’s short-term investments are placed with a wide array of financial institutions with high credit ratings. This diversified investment policy limits the company’s exposure both to credit risk and to concentrations of credit risk. Similar standards of diversity and creditworthiness are applied to the company’s counterparties in derivative instruments.

The trade receivable balances, reflecting the company’s diversified sources of revenue, are dispersed among the company’s broad customer base worldwide. As a consequence, concentrations of credit risk are limited. The company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers. Letters of credit or negotiated contracts, when the financial strength of a customer is not considered sufficient, are the principal securities obtained to support lines of credit.

Fair Value Fair values are derived either from quoted market prices or, if not available, the present value of the expected cash flows. The fair values reflect the cash that would have been received or paid if the instruments were settled at year-end.

Long-term debt of $6,599 and $8,870 had estimated fair values of $7,097 and $8,991 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The company holds cash equivalents and U.S. dollar marketable securities in domestic and offshore portfolios. Eurodollar bonds, floating-rate notes, time deposits and commercial paper are the primary instruments held. Cash equivalents and marketable securities had fair values of $2,449 and $2,543 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Of these balances, $1,446 and $1,630 at the respective year-ends were classified as cash equivalents that had average maturities under 90 days. The remainder, classified as marketable securities, had average maturities of approximately 3.6 years.

The company’s $1,500 investment in redeemable, convertible preferred stock of its Dynegy affiliate is carried at fair value.

NOTE 11. OPERATING SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA

ChevronTexaco separately manages its exploration and production; refining, marketing and transportation; and chemicals businesses. The company’s primary country of operation is the United States, its country of domicile. The remainder of the company’s operations is reported as International (outside the United States).

Segment Earnings The company evaluates the performance of its operating segments on an after-tax basis, without considering the effects of debt financing interest expense or investment interest income, both of which are managed by the company on a worldwide basis. Corporate administrative costs and assets are not allocated to the operating segments; instead, operating segments are billed only for direct corporate services. Nonbillable costs and merger effects remain as corporate expenses. After-tax segment income (loss) is presented in the following table.

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000		1999
Exploration and Production
United States	$ 1,779	$	3,453	$	1,133
International	2,533		3,702		1,450
Total Exploration and Production	4,312		7,155		2,583
Refining, Marketing and Transportation
United States	1,254		721		551
International	560		414		546
Total Refining, Marketing and
Transportation	1,814		1,135		1,097
Chemicals
United States	(186	)	(31	)	44
International	58		71		65
Total Chemicals	(128	)	40		109
Total Segment Income	5,998		8,330		3,789
Merger effects	$ (1,779	)	—		—
Interest expense	(552	)	(766	)	(779	)
Interest income	147		139		81
Other	(526	)	24		156
Net Income	$ 3,288	$	7,727	$	3,247

Segment Assets Segment assets do not include intercompany investments or intercompany receivables. “All Other” assets consist primarily of worldwide cash and marketable securities, real estate, information systems, the investment in Dynegy Inc., coal mining operations, power and gasification operations, and technology investments and merger-related assets held for sale at year-end 2001. Segment assets at year-end 2001 and 2000 follow.

FS-28 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 11. OPERATING SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA — Continued

	At December 31 — 2001	2000
Exploration and Production
United States	$ 12,718	$ 15,216
International	24,177	22,463
Total Exploration and Production	36,895	37,679
Refining, Marketing and Transportation
United States	8,902	12,118
International	16,426	17,034
Total Refining, Marketing and Transportation	25,328	29,152
Chemicals
United States	2,059	2,350
International	701	727
Total Chemicals	2,760	3,077
Total Segment Assets	64,983	69,908
All Other
United States	8,950	5,361
International	3,639	2,352
Total All Other	12,589	7,713
Total Assets — United States	32,629	35,045
Total Assets — International	44,943	42,576
Total Assets	$ 77,572	$ 77,621

Segment Sales and Other Operating Revenues Revenues for the exploration and production segment are derived primarily from the production of crude oil and natural gas. Revenues for the refining, marketing and transportation segment are derived from the refining and marketing of petroleum products, such as gasoline, jet fuel, gas oils, kerosene, residual fuel oils and other products derived from crude oil. This segment also generates revenues from the transportation and trading of crude oil and refined products. Prior to the July 2000 formation of CPChem, chemicals segment revenues were derived from the manufacture and sale of petrochemicals, plastic resins, and lube oil and fuel additives. Subsequent to the formation of the joint venture, only revenues from the manufacture and sale of lube oil and fuel additives were included.

“All Other” activities include corporate administrative costs, worldwide cash management and debt financing activities, coal mining operations, power and gasification operations, technology investments, insurance operations and real estate activities. Other than the United States, the only country where ChevronTexaco generates significant revenues is the United Kingdom, which amounted to $10,350, $12,101 and $9,650 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Sales revenues are based on the origin of the sale.

Reportable operating segment “Sales and other operating revenues,” including internal transfers, for the years 2001, 2000 and 1999 are presented in the following table. Sales from the transfer of products between segments are at prices that approximate market prices.

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000		1999
Exploration and Production
United States	$ 12,724	$	13,927	$	7,819
Intersegment	3,167		3,542		2,205
Total United States	15,891		17,469		10,024
International	9,126		9,052		6,202
Intersegment	7,376		6,189		3,800
Total International	16,502		15,241		10,002
Total Exploration and Production	32,393		32,710		20,026
Refining, Marketing
and Transportation
United States	29,294		31,926		20,468
Excise taxes	3,954		3,837		3,702
Intersegment	392		414		476
Total United States	33,640		36,177		24,646
International	45,248		52,501		38,993
Excise taxes	2,580		2,737		2,842
Intersegment	452		930		160
Total International	48,280		56,168		41,995
Total Refining, Marketing
and Transportation	81,920		92,345		66,641
Chemicals
United States	335		1,985		2,791
Excise taxes	—		1		2
Intersegment	89		137		162
Total United States	424		2,123		2,955
International	670		701		686
Excise taxes	12		26		28
Intersegment	65		—		171
Total International	747		727		885
Total Chemicals	1,171		2,850		3,840
All Other
United States	429		403		456
Intersegment	60		90		55
Total United States	489		493		511
International	37		(1	)	15
Intersegment	9		19		12
Total International	46		18		27
Total All Other	535		511		538
Segment Sales and Other
Operating Revenues
United States	50,444		56,262		38,136
International	65,575		72,154		52,909
Total Segment Sales and Other
Operating Revenues	116,019		128,416		91,045
Elimination of Intersegment Sales	(11,610	)	(11,321	)	(7,041	)
Total Sales and
Other Operating Revenues	$ 104,409	$	117,095	$	84,004

Segment Income Taxes Segment income tax expenses for the years 2001, 2000 and 1999 are as follows:

FS-29 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 11. OPERATING SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA — Continued

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000		1999
Exploration and Production
United States	$ 965	$	1,901	$	559
International	3,569		4,363		2,164
Total Exploration
and Production	4,534		6,264		2,723
Refining, Marketing
and Transportation
United States	744		383		279
International	260		152		175
Total Refining, Marketing
and Transportation	1,004		535		454
Chemicals
United States	(78	)	31		(13	)
International	23		30		45
Total Chemicals	(55	)	61		32
All Other*	(1,123	)	(538	)	(644	)
Total Income Tax Expense*	$ 4,360	$	6,322	$	2,565

• Excludes tax of $144 for extraordinary item.

Other Segment Information Additional information for the segmentation of major equity affiliates is contained in Note 14. Information related to properties, plant and equipment by segment is contained in Note 15.

NOTE 12. LITIGATION

Chevron, Texaco and four other oil companies (refiners) filed suit in 1995 contesting the validity of a patent granted to Unocal Corporation (Unocal) for reformulated gasoline, which ChevronTexaco sells in California in certain months of the year. In March 2000, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a September 1998 District Court decision that Unocal’s patent was valid and enforceable and assessed damages of 5.75 cents per gallon for gasoline produced in infringement of the patent. In May 2000, the Federal Circuit Court denied a petition for rehearing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit filed by the refiners in this case. The refiners petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court and, in February 2001, the Supreme Court denied the petition to review the lower court’s ruling and the case was remanded to the District Court for an accounting of all infringing gasoline produced from August 1, 1996, to September 30, 2000. The District Court granted Unocal’s motion for summary judgment requesting an accounting and denied the refiners’ motion to stay the proceedings and vacate the accounting order. However, the judge presiding over this case recused himself before entering a final judgment and a new judge was assigned. Additionally, in May 2001, the U.S. Patent Office (USPO) granted the refiners’ petition to re-examine the validity of Unocal’s patent and, in February 2002, the USPO ruled the patent invalid. Unocal has two months to respond to the USPO ruling. The Federal Trade Commission has also announced that it is investigating whether Unocal’s failure to disclose to the California Air Resources Board that it had filed a patent application was unfair competition, which may make Unocal’s patent unenforceable.

If Unocal’s patent ultimately is upheld and is enforceable, the company’s financial exposure includes royalties, plus interest, for production of gasoline that is proved to have infringed the patent. Chevron and Texaco, as well as Texaco’s former affiliates Equilon and Motiva, have been accruing in the normal course of business any future estimated liability for potential infringement of the patent covered by the trial court’s ruling. In 2000, Chevron and Texaco made payments to Unocal totaling approximately $28 for the original court ruling, including interest and fees.

Unocal has obtained additional patents for alternate formulations that could affect a larger share of U.S. gasoline production. ChevronTexaco believes these additional patents are invalid and unenforceable. However, if such patents are ultimately upheld, the competitive and financial effects on the company’s refining and marketing operations, while presently indeterminable, could be material.

Another issue involving the company is the petroleum industry’s use of methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) as a gasoline additive and its potential environmental impact through seepage into groundwater. Along with other oil companies, the company is a party to lawsuits and claims related to the use of the chemical MTBE in certain oxygenated gasolines. These actions may require the company to correct or ameliorate the alleged effects on the environment of prior release of MTBE by the company or other parties. Additional lawsuits and claims related to the use of MTBE, including personal-injury claims, may be filed in the future. Costs to the company related to these lawsuits and claims are not currently determinable. ChevronTexaco continues the use of MTBE in gasoline it sells in certain areas. The state of California has directed that MTBE be phased out of the manufacturing process by the end of 2002.

NOTE 13. LEASE COMMITMENTS

Certain noncancelable leases are classified as capital leases, and the leased assets are included as part of “Properties, plant and equipment, at cost.” Such leasing arrangements involve tanker charters, crude oil production and processing equipment, service stations and other facilities. Other leases are classified as operating leases and are not capitalized. The payments on such leases are recorded as expense. Details of the capitalized leased assets are as follows:

	At December 31 — 2001	2000
Exploration and production	$ 172	$ 223
Refining, marketing and transportation	848	851
Total	1,020	1,074
Less: accumulated amortization	567	587
Net capitalized leased assets	$ 453	$ 487

Rental expenses incurred for operating leases during 2001, 2000 and 1999 were as follows:

FS-30 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 13. LEASE COMMITMENTS — Continued

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000	1999
Minimum rentals	$ 1,132	$ 1,062	$ 804
Contingent rentals	14	35	16
Total	1,146	1,097	820
Less: sublease rental income	76	77	73
Net rental expense	$ 1,070	$ 1,020	$ 747

Contingent rentals are based on factors other than the passage of time, principally sales volumes at leased service stations. Certain leases include escalation clauses for adjusting rentals to reflect changes in price indices, renewal options ranging from one to 25 years, and/or options to purchase the leased property during or at the end of the initial or renewal lease period for the fair market value or other specified amount at that time.

At December 31, 2001, the estimated future minimum lease payments (net of noncancelable sublease rentals) under operating and capital leases, which at inception had a noncancelable term of more than one year, were as follows:

	At December 31 — Operating	Capital
	Leases	Leases
Year: 2002	$ 692	$ 80
2003	314	111
2004	301	54
2005	266	49
2006	237	47
Thereafter	731	613
Total	$ 2,541	$ 954
Less: amounts representing interest
and executory costs		323
Net present values		631
Less: capital lease obligations
included in short-term debt		346
Long-term capital lease obligations		$ 285

NOTE 14. INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES

Descriptions of major affiliates during 2001 are as follows:

Tengizchevroil Tengizchevroil (TCO) is a joint venture formed in 1993 to develop the Tengiz and Korolev oil fields in Kazakhstan over a 40-year period. Chevron’s ownership was 45 percent during 1999 and 2000. In January 2001, the company purchased an additional 5 percent interest. Upon formation of the joint venture, the company incurred an obligation of $420, payable to the Republic of Kazakhstan upon attainment of a dedicated export system with the capability of the greater of 260,000 barrels of oil per day or TCO’s production capacity. As a part of the January transaction, the company paid $210 of the $420 obligation. The $420 was also included in the carrying value of the original investment, as the company believed, beyond a reasonable doubt, that its full payment would be made.

Equilon Enterprises LLC Effective January 1, 1998, Texaco and Shell Oil Company (Shell) formed Equilon, a Delaware limited liability company. Equilon is a joint venture that combined major elements of those companies’ western and midwestern U.S. refining and marketing businesses and their nationwide trading, transportation and lubricants businesses. The company’s 44 percent ownership interest in Equilon was placed in trust on October 9, 2001, as required by the FTC. The trust completed the disposition of the company’s investment in Equilon in February 2002.

Because Equilon is a limited liability company, ChevronTexaco recorded the provision for income taxes and related income tax liability applicable to its share of the venture’s income separately in its consolidated financial statements.

See Note 2 for additional information on Equilon.

Motiva Enterprises LLC Effective July 1, 1998, Texaco, Shell and Saudi Refining Inc., a corporate affiliate of Saudi Aramco, formed Motiva, a Delaware limited liability company. Motiva is a joint venture that combined the East and Gulf Coast U.S. refining and marketing businesses of Shell and Star Enterprise (Star). Star, in turn, was a joint venture owned 50 percent each by Texaco and Saudi Refining Inc.

Under the terms of the Limited Liability Company Agreement for Motiva, the ownership in Motiva is subject to annual adjustment through year-end 2005, based on the performance of the assets contributed to Motiva. Accordingly, the company’s initial 32.5 percent ownership in Motiva was adjusted effective as of January 1, 2000, to just under 31 percent. At January 1, 2001, the company’s ownership percentage was adjusted to 35 percent. The company’s ownership interest in Motiva was placed in trust on October 9, 2001, as required by the FTC. The trust completed the disposition of the company’s investment in Motiva in February 2002.

Because Motiva is a limited liability company, ChevronTexaco recorded the provision for income taxes and related income tax liability applicable to its share of the venture’s income separately in its consolidated financial statements.

See Note 2 for additional information on Motiva.

LG-Caltex Corporation ChevronTexaco owns 50 percent of LG-Caltex, a joint venture formed in 1967 between the LG Group and Caltex, originally incorporated as Honam Oil Refinery Company Limited, to engage in importing, refining and marketing of petroleum products in Korea.

Star Petroleum Refining Company, Ltd. ChevronTexaco has a 64 percent equity ownership interest in Star Petroleum Refining Company Limited (SPRC), which owns the Star refinery at Ma Ta Phut, Thailand. The Thai national petroleum company owns the remaining 36 percent of SPRC.

Caltex Australia Ltd. ChevronTexaco has a 50 percent equity ownership interest in Caltex Australia Limited, which is the largest oil company in Australia. The remaining 50 percent of Caltex Australia is publicly owned.

Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC ChevronTexaco owns 50 percent of CPChem, formed in July 2000 when Chevron merged most of its petrochemicals businesses with those of Phillips Petroleum Company. Because CPChem is a limited liability company, ChevronTexaco records the provision for income taxes and related tax liability applicable to its share of the venture’s income separately in its consolidated financial statements.

FS-31 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 14. INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES — Continued

Dynegy Inc. Dynegy is a gatherer, processor, transporter and marketer of energy products in North America and the United Kingdom. These products include natural gas, natural gas liquids, crude oil and electricity. In 2001, ChevronTexaco exercised its preemptive rights and acquired a further 1.2 million shares of Dynegy’s common stock for $40.8. This additional investment maintained the company’s equity ownership in Dynegy at approximately 26.5 percent. Also, in 2001, ChevronTexaco invested $1,500 in Dynegy redeemable, convertible preferred stock. The market value of ChevronTexaco’s share of Dynegy common stock at December 31, 2001, was $2,206, based on equivalent closing market prices. The fair value of the redeemable convertible preferred stock was $1,500.

“Sales and other operating revenues” on the Consolidated Statement of Income include $13,868, $15,741 and $10,068 with major affiliated companies for 2001, 2000 and 1999. “Purchased crude oil and products” include $3,859, $4,824 and $2,837 with major affiliated companies for 2001, 2000 and 1999.

“Accounts and notes receivable” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include $481 and $1,392 due from affiliated companies at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. “Accounts payable” include $168 and $313 due to major affiliated companies at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. These 2001 amounts exclude balances with Equilon and Motiva.

Equity in earnings, together with investments in and advances to companies accounted for using the equity method, and other investments accounted for at or below cost, are as follows:

	Investments and Advances		Equity in Earnings
	At December 31		Year ended December 31
	2001	2000	2001	2000		1999
Exploration and Production
Tengizchevroil	$ 2,459	$ 1,857	$ 332	$	376	$	177
Other	808	550	205		163		98
Total Exploration and
Production	3,267	2,407	537		539		275
Refining, Marketing
and Transportation
Equilon*	—	1,724	274		151		219
Motiva*	—	743	276		154		(5	)
LG-Caltex Oil Corporation	1,491	1,468	60		80		310
Caspian Pipeline Consortium	928	587	38		22		4
Star Petroleum Refining
Company Ltd.	394	337	(56	)	(4	)	(27	)
Caltex Australia Limited	267	253	16		13		(48	)
Other	755	680	92		117		93
Total Refining, Marketing and
Transportation	3,835	5,792	700		533		546
Chemicals
Chevron Phillips Chemical
Company LLC	1,587	1,830	(229	)	(114	)	—
Other	17	15	2		(9	)	1
Total Chemicals	1,604	1,845	(227	)	(123	)	1
Dynegy Inc.	2,628	929	188		127		51
All Other	507	365	(54	)	1		23
Total Equity Method	$ 11,841	$ 11,338	$ 1,144	$	1,077	$	896
Other at or Below Cost	411	426
Total Investments and
Advances	$ 12,252	$ 11,764
Total U.S	$ 5,370	$ 6,323	$ 693	$	562	$	419
Total International	$ 6,882	$ 5,441	$ 451	$	515	$	477

• Placed in trust at the time of the merger and accounting changed from the equity method to the cost basis. Interests were classified as “Assets held for sale — merger related” at December 31, 2001.

FS-32 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 14. INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES — Continued

The following table provides summarized financial information on a 100 percent basis for Equilon, Motiva and all other equity affiliates, as well as ChevronTexaco’s total share.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31	Equilon* — 2001	2000	1999	Motiva* — 2001	2000	1999
Total revenues	$ 36,501	$ 50,010	$ 29,398	$ 14,459	$ 19,446	$ 12,196
Income (loss) before income
tax expense	604	228	347	771	461	(69	)
Net income (loss)	397	148	226	486	300	(45	)
AT DECEMBER 31
Current assets	$ —	$ 3,134	$ 3,426	$ —	$ 1,381	$ 1,271
Noncurrent assets	—	6,830	7,208	—	5,110	5,307
Current liabilities	—	4,587	4,853	—	1,150	1,278
Noncurrent liabilities	—	897	735	—	2,017	2,095
NET EQUITY	$ —	$ 4,480	$ 5,046	$ —	$ 3,324	$ 3,205

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31	Other Affiliates — 2001	2000		1999	ChevronTexaco Share — 2001	2000	1999
Total revenues	$ 69,549	$	56,602	$ 33,772	$ 46,649	$ 48,925	$ 30,135
Income (loss) before income
tax expense	646		2,420	1,566	1,430	1,230	925
Net income (loss)	(74	)	1,689	1,326	1,144	1,077	896
AT DECEMBER 31
Current assets	$ 17,015	$	18,442	$ 7,954	$ 5,922	$ 8,456	$ 4,992
Noncurrent assets	40,191		34,620	18,463	16,276	16,965	12,007
Current liabilities	14,688		16,109	7,665	4,757	7,820	5,615
Noncurrent liabilities	23,255		20,905	10,924	5,600	6,263	3,243
NET EQUITY	$ 19,263	$	16,048	$ 7,828	$ 11,841	$ 11,338	$ 8,141

• Accounted for under the equity method pre-merger, and the cost basis post-merger.

NOTE 15. PROPERTIES, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 1

	At December 31
	Gross Investment at Cost			Net Investment
	2001	2000	1999	2001	2000	1999
Exploration and Production
United States	$ 38,157	$ 37,342	$ 39,772	$ 10,560	$ 12,093	$ 12,773
International	33,273	30,396	29,602	17,743	16,938	15,725
Total Exploration
and Production	71,430	67,738	69,374	28,303	29,031	28,498
Refining, Marketing
and Transportation
United States	12,944	12,557	12,669	6,237	6,176	6,438
International	11,386	10,986	11,736	6,700	6,718	7,251
Total Refining, Marketing
and Transportation	24,330	23,543	24,405	12,937	12,894	13,689
Chemicals
United States	602	610	3,689	321	342	2,354
International	698	672	714	405	395	453
Total Chemicals	1,300	1,282	4,403	726	737	2,807
All Other 3	2,883	3,005	2,809	1,267	1,657	1,493
Total United States	54,529	53,485	58,922	18,367	20,275	23,048
Total International	45,414	42,083	42,069	24,866	24,044	23,439
Total	$ 99,943	$ 95,568	$ 100,991	$ 43,233	$ 44,319	$ 46,487

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]

	Year ended December 31
	Additions at Cost 2			Depreciation Expense
	2001	2000	1999	2001	2000	1999
Exploration and Production
United States	$ 1,973	$ 1,931	$ 1,383	$ 3,508	$ 2,138	$ 1,932
International	2,900	3,019	4,934	2,085	1,787	1,546
Total Exploration
and Production	4,873	4,950	6,317	5,593	3,925	3,478
Refining, Marketing
and Transportation
United States	626	484	560	476	516	542
International	566	457	605	555	651	539
Total Refining, Marketing
and Transportation	1,192	941	1,165	1,031	1,167	1,081
Chemicals
United States	10	78	326	22	77	174
International	31	42	59	19	18	20
Total Chemicals	41	120	385	41	95	194
All Other 3	174	202	181	394	134	181
Total United States	2,780	2,695	2,447	4,391	2,825	2,824
Total International	3,500	3,518	5,601	2,668	2,496	2,110
Total	$ 6,280	$ 6,213	$ 8,048	$ 7,059	$ 5,321	$ 4,934

| 1 Net of accumulated abandonment and restoration costs of $2,155, $2,259 and
$2,397 at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. |
| --- |
| 2 Net of dry hole expense related to prior years’ expenditures of $228, $60 and
$108 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. |
| 3 Primarily coal, real estate assets and management information systems. |

FS-33 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 16. TAXES

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000		1999
Taxes on income
U.S. federal
Current	$ 946	$	1,238	$ 307
Deferred	(643	)	363	25
State and local	276		185	(50	)
Total United States	579		1,786	282
International	3,764		4,378	2,285
Current	3,764		4,378	2,285
Deferred	17		158	(2	)
Total International	3,781		4,536	2,283
Total taxes on income	$ 4,360	$	6,322	$ 2,565

The above table does not include a current U.S. tax benefit of $2 and a U.S. deferred tax benefit of $142 associated with the extraordinary item.

In 2001, before-tax income, including related corporate and other charges, for U.S. operations was $1,778, compared with $5,823 in 2000 and $1,738 in 1999. For international operations, before-tax income was $6,513, $8,226 and $4,074 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. U.S. federal income tax expense was reduced by $202, $165 and $156 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, for business tax credits.

The company’s effective income tax rate varied from the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate because of the following:

2001		2000		1999
U.S. statutory federal income tax rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
Effect of income taxes from international
operations in excess of taxes at the
U.S. statutory rate	19.0		11.0		16.7
State and local taxes on income, net
of U.S. federal income tax benefit	2.2		0.9		(0.1	)
Prior-year tax adjustments	1.1		(0.6	)	(1.5	)
Tax credits	(2.4	)	(1.2	)	(2.7	)
Other	(1.7	)	0.2		(2.3	)
Consolidated companies	53.2		45.3		45.1
Effect of recording equity in income
of certain affiliated companies
on an after-tax basis	(0.6	)	(0.3	)	(1.0	)
Effective tax rate	52.6	%	45.0	%	44.1	%

The increase in the 2001 effective tax rate was primarily due to U.S. before-tax income (generally subject to a lower tax rate) being a significantly smaller percentage of overall before-tax income in 2001 compared with 2000. The decline in the U.S. before-tax income arose primarily because substantially all of the 2001 merger-related expenses were associated with operations in the United States.

The company records its deferred taxes on a tax-jurisdiction basis and classifies those net amounts as current or noncurrent based on the balance sheet classification of the related assets or liabilities.

The reported deferred tax balances are composed of the following:

	At December 31 — 2001	2000
Deferred tax liabilities
Properties, plant and equipment	$ 7,478	$	7,224
Inventory	50		—
Investments and other	1,334		2,085
Total deferred tax liabilities	8,862		9,309
Deferred tax assets
Abandonment/environmental reserves	(913	)	(862	)
Employee benefits	(863	)	(979	)
Tax loss carryforwards	(611	)	(527	)
AMT/other tax credits	(511	)	(943	)
Inventory	—		(27	)
Other accrued liabilities	(158	)	(43	)
Miscellaneous	(2,164	)	(1,454	)
Total deferred tax assets	(5,220	)	(4,835	)
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance	1,431		1,574
Total deferred taxes, net	$ 5,073	$	6,048

The valuation allowance relates to foreign tax credit carryforwards, tax loss carryforwards and temporary differences that are not expected to be realized.

At December 31, 2001 and 2000, deferred taxes were classified in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:

	At December 31 — 2001		2000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$ (671	)	$ (327	)
Deferred charges and other assets	(399	)	(312	)
Federal and other taxes on income	11		—
Noncurrent deferred income taxes	6,132		6,687
Total deferred income taxes, net	$ 5,073		$ 6,048

It is the company’s policy for subsidiaries included in the U.S. consolidated tax return to record income tax expense as though they filed separately, with the parent recording the adjustment to income tax expense for the effects of consolidation. Income taxes are accrued for retained earnings of international subsidiaries and corporate joint ventures intended to be remitted. Income taxes are not accrued for unremitted earnings of international operations that have been or are intended to be reinvested indefinitely.

Undistributed earnings of international consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates for which no deferred income tax provision has been made for possible future remittances totaled approximately $9,003 at December 31, 2001. Substantially all of this amount represents earnings reinvested as part of the company’s ongoing business. It is not practical to estimate the amount of taxes that might be payable on the eventual remittance of such earnings. On remittance, certain countries impose withholding taxes that, subject to certain limitations, are then available for use as tax credits against a U.S. tax liability, if any.

FS-34 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 16. TAXES — Continued

Taxes other than on income were as follows:

	Year ended December 31 — 2001	2000	1999
Taxes other than on income
United States
Excise taxes on products
and merchandise	$ 3,954	$ 3,909	$ 3,767
Import duties and other levies	8	25	34
Property and other
miscellaneous taxes	410	345	365
Payroll taxes	148	139	165
Taxes on production	225	238	158
Total United States	4,745	4,656	4,489
International
Excise taxes on products
and merchandise	2,592	2,692	2,262
Import duties and other levies	7,461	8,073	8,352
Property and other
miscellaneous taxes	268	271	247
Payroll taxes	79	69	77
Taxes on production	11	66	14
Total International	10,411	11,171	10,952
Total taxes other than on income	$ 15,156	$ 15,827	$ 15,441

NOTE 17. SHORT-TERM DEBT

	At December 31 — 2001	2000
Commercial paper*	$ 8,664	$	4,258
Notes payable to banks and others with
originating terms of one year or less	1,036		1,612
Current maturities of long-term debt	1,095		1,519
Current maturities of long-term
capital leases	45		42
Redeemable long-term obligations
Long-term debt	488		504
Capital leases	301		302
Subtotal	11,629		8,237
Reclassified to long-term debt	(3,200	)	(5,143	)
Total short-term debt	$ 8,429	$	3,094

• Weighted-average interest rates at December 31, 2001 and 2000, were 1.99 percent and 6.57 percent, respectively, including the effect of interest rate swaps.

Redeemable long-term obligations consist primarily of tax-exempt variable-rate put bonds that are included as current liabilities because they become redeemable at the option of the bondholders during the year following the balance sheet date.

The company periodically enters into interest rate swaps on a portion of its short-term debt. See Note 10 for information concerning the company’s debt-related derivative activities.

Utilized lines of credit available for short-term financing totaled $210 at December 31, 2001.

At December 31, 2001, the company had $3,200 of committed credit facilities with banks worldwide, which permit the company to refinance short-term obligations on a long-term basis. The facilities support the company’s commercial paper borrowings. Interest on borrowings under the terms of specific agreements may be based on the London Interbank Offered Rate, the Reserve Adjusted Domestic Certificate of Deposit Rate or bank prime rate. No amounts were outstanding under these credit agreements during 2001 or at year-end.

At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the company classified $3,200 and $5,143, respectively, of short-term debt as long-term. Settlement of these obligations is not expected to require the use of working capital in 2002, as the company has both the intent and ability to refinance this debt on a long-term basis.

NOTE 18. LONG-TERM DEBT

ChevronTexaco has three “shelf” registrations on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission that together would permit the issuance of $2,800 of debt securities pursuant to Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933.

	At December 31 — 2001	2000
6.625% notes due 2004	$ 499	$	499
8.11% amortizing notes due 2004	450		540
7.327% amortizing notes due 2014 1	430		430
5.5% note due 2009	393		392
7.45% notes due 2004	—		349
6% notes due 2005	299		299
9.75% debentures due 2020	250		250
3.5% convertible notes due 2004	—		203
5.7% notes due 2008	201		201
8.5% notes due 2003	200		200
7.75% debentures due 2033	199		199
8.625% debentures due 2031	199		199
8.625% debentures due 2032	199		199
8.375% debentures due 2022	199		198
7.5% debentures due 2043	198		198
6.875% debentures due 2023	196		196
7.09% notes due 2007	150		150
8.25% debentures due 2006	150		150
8.625% debentures due 2010	150		150
8.875% debentures due 2021	150		150
Medium-term notes, maturing from
2001 to 2043 (7.4%) 2	360		1,081
Other foreign currency obligations (5.6%) 2	193		1,095
Other long-term debt (4.2%) 2	1,534		1,542
Total including debt due within one year	6,599		8,870
Debt due within one year	(1,095	)	(1,519	)
Reclassified from short-term debt	3,200		5,143
Total long-term debt	$ 8,704	$	12,494

1 Guarantee of ESOP debt.
2 Less than $150 individually; weighted-average interest rates at December 31,
2001.

Consolidated long-term debt maturing after December 31, 2001, is as follows: 2002 — $1,095; 2003 — $536; 2004 — $857; 2005 — $570; and 2006 — $195; after 2006 — $3,346.

See Note 10 for information concerning the company’s debt-related derivative activities.

FS-35 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 19. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

The company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (FAS 133), as amended by FAS 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” effective January 1, 2001. The adoption of FAS 133 and FAS 138 did not have a significant impact on the company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Recent interpretations of FAS 133 and FAS 138 by the FASB Derivatives Implementation Group prescribe mark-to-market accounting for certain natural gas sales contracts. Some of these interpretations became effective January 1, 2002. Adoption at that time did not result in a material effect to earnings. The effect of subsequent changes in the contracts’ fair values is uncertain.

In September 2000, the FASB issued Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities - A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125” (FAS 140). FAS 140 is effective for transfers occurring after March 31, 2001, and for disclosures relating to securitization transactions and collateral for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2000. Adoption of FAS 140 had no significant effect on ChevronTexaco’s accounting or disclosures for the types of transactions in the scope of the new standard.

In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations” (FAS 141), Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142) and Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (FAS 143). FAS 141 is effective for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, and for all business combinations accounted for using the purchase method for which the date of acquisition is July 1, 2001, or later. FAS 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, except for goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001, which were immediately subject to the amortization and nonamortization provisions of the Statement. FAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Adoption of FAS 141 will have no effect on the company’s pooling-of-interests method of accounting for the Texaco merger transaction, but will affect future transactions. Similarly, adoption of FAS 142 may affect future transactions, but is not expected to have an effect on the company’s prior business combinations. FAS 143 differs in several significant respects from current accounting for asset retirements obligations under FAS 19, “Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies.” Adoption of FAS 143 will affect future accounting and reporting of the assets, liabilities and expenses related to these obligations. The magnitude of the effect has not yet been determined.

In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (FAS 144). FAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, with initial application effective as of the beginning of the fiscal year adopted. Adoption of FAS 144 will not affect assets classified as held for disposal as a result of disposal activities that were initiated prior to its initial application, but may affect future disposals.

NOTE 20. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits The company has defined benefit pension plans for most employees and provides for certain health care and life insurance plans for active and qualifying retired employees. For the pension plans, the company is required to satisfy the Employee Retirement Income Security Act minimum funding standard. The company’s annual contributions for medical and dental benefits are limited to the lesser of actual medical and dental claims or a defined fixed per-capita amount. Life insurance benefits are paid by the company, and annual contributions are based on actual plan experience. Unfunded pension and postretirement benefits are paid directly when incurred; accordingly, these payments are not reflected as changes in plan assets in the following table.

The status of the company’s pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans for 2001 and 2000 is as follows:

FS-36 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 20. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS — Continued

	Pension Benefits
	2001			2000				Other Benefits
	U.S.	Int'l.		U.S.		Int'l.		2001			2000
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION
Benefit obligation at January 1	$ 4,977	$	1,736	$	5,070	$	1,737	$	2,247		$ 2,103
Service cost	111		47		118		47		21		20
Interest cost	355		136		363		133		165		161
Plan participants’ contributions	2		2		2		1		—		18
Plan amendments	12		13		7		3		(10	)	—
Actuarial loss	341		108		77		84		244		134
Foreign currency exchange rate changes	—		(94	)	—		(151	)	(9	)	(7	)
Benefits paid	(532	)	(110	)	(659	)	(121	)	(158	)	(182	)
Curtailment	(47	)	—		—		(3	)	(3	)	—
Special
termination benefits 1	47		14		—		6		29		—
Plan divestiture	—		(4	)	(1	)	—		—		—
Acquisitions/joint ventures	(86	)	—		—		—		—		—
Benefit obligation at December 31	5,180		1,848		4,977		1,736		2,526		2,247
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS
Fair value of plan assets at January 1	5,098		1,757		5,685		1,914		—		—
Actual return on plan assets	(221	)	(90	)	27		71		—		—
Foreign currency exchange rate changes	—		(56	)	—		(155	)	—		—
Employer contribution	2		26		21		47		—		—
Plan participants’ contributions	2		2		2		1		—		—
Expenses	(6	)	—		(8	)	—		—		—
Benefits paid	(475	)	(88	)	(623	)	(125	)	—		—
Plan divestiture	—		(4	)	(2	)	—		—		—
Curtailment	—		—		(4	)	4		—		—
Fair value of plan assets at December 31	4,400		1,547		5,098		1,757		—		—
FUNDED STATUS	(780	)	(301	)	121		21		(2,526	)	(2,247	)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss (gain)	837		493		(29	)	161		93		(145	)
Unrecognized prior-service cost	129		70		185		75		(24	)	(7	)
Unrecognized net transitional assets	—		(7	)	(2	)	(12	)	—		—
Total recognized at December 31	$ 186	$	255	$	275	$	245	$	(2,457	)	$ (2,399	)
AMOUNTS RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31
Prepaid benefit cost	$ 568	$	574	$	560	$	557	$	—		$ —
Accrued benefit liability	(529	)	(334	)	(438	)	(330	)	(2,457	)	(2,399	)
Intangible asset	10		12		10		12		—		—
Accumulated other comprehensive
income 2	137		3		143		6		—		—
Net amount recognized	$ 186	$	255	$	275	$	245	$	(2,457	)	$ (2,399	)
Weighted-average assumptions
as of December 31
Discount rate	7.3	%	7.7	%	7.5	%	7.8	%	7.3	%	7.6	%
Expected return on plan assets	8.8	%	8.9	%	10.0	%	9.1	%	—		—
Rate of compensation increase	4.0	%	5.4	%	4.1	%	5.0	%	4.1	%	4.4	%

| 1 Primarily relates to a special involuntary termination enhancement to pension
and postretirement benefits under the Texaco change-in-control program in 2001. |
| --- |
| 2 Accumulated other comprehensive income includes deferred income taxes of $48
and $1 in 2001 for U.S. and International, respectively, and $47 and $2 in 2000 for U.S. and International, respectively. |

FS-37 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 20. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS — Continued

The components of net periodic benefit cost for 2001, 2000 and 1999 were:

	Pension Benefits
	2001			2000				1999				Other Benefits
	U.S.	Int'l.		U.S.			Int'l.	U.S.		Int'l.		2001		2000		1999
Service cost	$ 111	$	47	$	118		$ 47	$	134	$	46	$	21	$	20	$	28
Interest cost	355		136		363		133		350		137		165		161		153
Expected return on plan assets	(443	)	(170	)	(503	)	(167	)	(491	)	(146	)	—		—		—
Amortization of transitional assets	(2	)	(4	)	(31	)	(6	)	(36	)	(17	)	—		—		—
Amortization of prior-service costs	25		12		30		12		27		16		(1	)	(1	)	—
Recognized actuarial losses (gains)	13		7		10		(2	)	3		(2	)	(6	)	(10	)	1
Settlement losses (gains)	12		—		(61	)	1		(103	)	1		—		—		—
Curtailment losses (gains)	26		—		(20	)	2		6		1		20		(15	)	(12	)
Special termination benefit
recognition*	47		14		—		6		205		2		29		—		—
Net periodic benefit cost	$ 144	$	42	$	(94	)	$ 26	$	95	$	38	$	228	$	155	$	170

• Primarily relates to a special involuntary termination enhancement to pension and postretirement benefits under the Texaco change-in-control program in 2001 and a special involuntary termination enhancement to pension benefits in 1999 under a Chevron companywide restructuring program.

The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $2,496, $2,187 and $1,269, respectively, at December 31, 2001, and $850, $737 and $33, respectively, at December 31, 2000.

For postretirement benefit measurement purposes, one set of health care cost-trend rates was used for pre-age 65 and post-age 65 retirees. Starting in 2002, with approximately an 11 percent cost increase over the previous year, the trend rates gradually drop to the ultimate rate of 4.5 percent over 5 years. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost-trend rates would have had the following effects:

	One Percent — Increase	One Percent — Decrease
Effect on total service and
interest cost components	$ 20	$ (20	)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation	$ 231	$ (193	)

Profit Sharing/Savings Plan Eligible employees of ChevronTexaco and certain of its subsidiaries participate in either the Chevron Profit Sharing/Savings Plan or the Employees Thrift Plan of Texaco. Charges to expense for these plans were $157, $63 and $64 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP) In December 1989, Chevron established a leveraged ESOP as part of the Profit Sharing/Savings Plan. The ESOP provides a partial prefunding of the company’s future commitments to the Profit Sharing/ Savings Plan, which will result in annual income tax savings for the company.

In 1988, Texaco established a leveraged ESOP as part of the Employees Thrift Plan of Texaco Inc. The Thrift Plan ESOP loan was satisfied in December 2000. The ESOP was designed to provide participants with a benefit of approximately 6 percent of base pay.

As permitted by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans,” the company has elected to continue its practices, which are based on Statement of Position 76-3, “Accounting Practices for Certain Employee Stock Ownership Plans,” and subsequent consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The debt of the ESOPs is recorded as debt, and shares pledged as collateral are reported as “Deferred compensation and benefit plan trust” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity. The company reports compensation expense equal to ESOP debt principal repayments less dividends received by the ESOPs. Interest incurred on the ESOP debt is recorded as interest expense. Dividends paid on ESOP shares are reflected as a reduction of retained earnings. All ESOP shares are considered outstanding for earnings-per-share computations.

Expense recorded for the ESOPs was $75, $26 and $62 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, including $62, $48 and $51 of interest expense related to ESOP debt. All dividends paid on the ESOP shares held are used to service the ESOP debt. The dividends used were $86, $77 and $63 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

The company made ESOP contributions of $75, $1 and $67 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, to satisfy ESOP debt service in excess of dividends received by the ESOP. The ESOP shares were pledged as collateral for the debt. Shares are released from a suspense account and allocated to the accounts of plan participants, based on the debt service deemed to be paid in the year in proportion to the total of current-year and remaining debt service. The charge (credit) to compensation expense was $13, $(22) and $11 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. ESOP shares

FS-38 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 20. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS — Continued

as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, were as follows:

Thousands — Allocated shares	21,790	23,706
Unallocated shares	8,836	10,877
Total ESOP shares	30,626	34,583

Benefit Plan Trust Texaco established a benefit plan trust for funding obligations under some of its benefit plans. At year-end 2001, the trust contained 7.1 million shares of ChevronTexaco treasury stock. The company intends to continue to pay its obligations under the benefit plans. The trust will use the shares, proceeds from the sale of such shares and dividends on such shares to pay benefits only to the extent that the company does not pay such benefits. The trustee will vote the shares held in the trust as instructed by the trust’s beneficiaries. The shares held by the trust are not considered outstanding for earnings-per-share purposes until distributed or sold by the trust in payment of benefit obligations.

Management Incentive Plans Chevron had two incentive plans, the Management Incentive Plan (MIP) and the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) for officers and other regular salaried employees of the company and its subsidiaries who hold positions of significant responsibility. The plans will be expanded to include former employees of Texaco and Caltex. The MIP is an annual cash incentive plan that links awards to performance results of the prior year. The cash awards may be deferred by conversion to stock units or other investment fund alternatives. Awards under the LTIP may take the form of, but are not limited to, stock options, restricted stock, stock units and nonstock grants. Texaco also had a cash incentive program and a Stock Incentive Plan (SIP) that included stock options, restricted stock and other incentive awards for executives, directors and key employees. Awards under the Caltex LTIP were in the form of performance units and stock appreciation rights. Charges to expense for the combined management incentive plans, excluding expense related to LTIP and SIP stock options and restricted stock awards, which are discussed in Note 21, were $93, $83 and $54 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Other Incentive Plans Chevron had a program that provided eligible employees with an annual cash bonus if the company achieved certain financial and safety goals. The program was expanded to include former employees of Texaco and Caltex post-merger. Texaco and Caltex also had similar programs. Charges for the combined programs were $154, $230 and $60 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

NOTE 21. STOCK OPTIONS

The company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation programs, which are described below. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in connection with these programs was $111, $23 and $21 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Had compensation cost for the company’s combined stock options been determined based on the fair market value at the grant dates of the awards consistent with the methodology prescribed by FAS No. 123, net income and earnings per share for 2001, 2000 and 1999 would have been the pro forma amounts shown on the following table:

	2001	2000	1999
Net
income As reported	$ 3,288	$ 7,727	$ 3,247
Pro forma	$ 3,202	$ 7,687	$ 3,134
Earnings per share
As reported — basic	$ 3.10	$ 7.23	$ 3.01
— diluted	$ 3.09	$ 7.21	$ 3.00
Pro forma — basic	$ 3.02	$ 7.19	$ 2.91
— diluted	$ 3.01	$ 7.18	$ 2.90

The effects of applying FAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts. FAS No. 123 does not apply to awards granted prior to 1995. In addition, certain options vest over several years, and awards in future years, whose terms and conditions may vary, are anticipated.

Broad-Based Employee Stock Options In 1996, Chevron granted to all its eligible employees an option for 150 shares of stock or equivalents at an exercise price of $51.875 per share. In addition, a portion of the awards granted under the LTIP had terms similar to the broad-based employee stock options. The options vested in June 1997.

Options for 7,204,800 shares, including similar-termed LTIP awards, were granted for this program in 1996, and the program expired in 1999.

In 1998, Chevron announced another broad-based Employee Stock Option Program that granted to all eligible employees an option that varied from 100 to 300 shares of stock or equivalents, dependent on the employee’s salary or job grade. These options vested after two years in February 2000. Options for 4,820,800 shares were awarded at an exercise price of $76.3125 per share. Outstanding option shares were 3,064,367 at year-end 2000. In 2001, exercises of 653,096 and forfeitures of 44,960 reduced the outstanding option shares to 2,366,311 at the end of the year. The options expire February 11, 2008. The company recorded expenses of $1, $(2) and $4 for these options in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

The fair value of each option share for the 1998 program on the date of grant under FAS No. 123 was estimated at $19.08 using the average results of Black-Scholes models for the preceding 10 years. The 10-year averages of each assumption used by the Black-Scholes models were: a risk-free interest rate of 7.0 percent, a dividend yield of 4.2 percent, an expected life of seven years and a volatility of 24.7 percent.

Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock options granted under the LTIP are generally awarded at market price on the date of grant and are exercisable not earlier than one year and not later than 10 years from the date of grant. However, a portion of the LTIP options granted in 1996 had terms similar to the broad-based employee stock options. The maximum number of shares that may be granted each year is 1 percent of the total outstanding shares of common stock as of January 1 of such year.

Under the Texaco Stock Incentive Plan (SIP), the maximum number of shares that were granted as stock options or restricted stock was 1 percent of the common stock outstanding on December 31 of the previous year. Restricted shares granted under SIP

FS-39 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 21. STOCK OPTIONS — Continued

contained a performance element, which had to be satisfied in order for all or a specified portion of the shares to vest. Upon the merger, all restricted shares became vested and converted to ChevronTexaco shares at the merger exchange ratio of 0.77. Restricted performance shares awarded in each year under the SIP on a converted basis were as follows:

	2001	2000	1999
Shares (thousands)	392	409	214
Weighted-average fair value	$ 91.05	$ 73.40	$ 81.53

Stock options granted under the SIP extend for 10 years from the date of grant and vest over a two-year period at a rate of 50 percent in the first year and 50 percent in the second year. The exercise price cannot be less than the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of the grant. The plan provides for restored options. This feature enables a participant who exercises a stock option by exchanging previously acquired common stock or who has shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations to receive new options equal to the number of shares exchanged or withheld. The restored options are fully exercisable six months after the date of grant and the exercise price is the fair market value of the common stock on the day the restored option is granted. Amounts charged to compensation expense in 2001, 2000 and 1999 were $110, $25 and $19.

The fair market value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant under FAS No. 123 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Chevron Plans:
Expected life in years	7	7	7
Risk-free interest rate	4.1 %	5.8 %	5.5 %
Volatility	24.4 %	25.6 %	20.1 %
Dividend yield	3.0 %	3.0 %	3.0 %
Texaco Plans:
Expected life in years	2	2	2
Risk-free interest rate	3.9 %	6.4 %	5.4 %
Volatility	25.9 %	33.8 %	29.1 %
Dividend yield	3.1 %	3.0 %	3.0 %

The Black-Scholes weighted-average fair value of the Chevron options granted during 2001, 2000 and 1999 was $20.45, $22.34 and $20.40 per share, respectively, and the weighted-average fair value of the Texaco options granted during 2001, 2000 and 1999 was $12.90, $11.56 and $11.21 per share.

Upon the merger, outstanding Texaco stock options were converted to ChevronTexaco options at the merger exchange rate of 0.77. The following table presents the combined stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, with information on Texaco’s stock options on a converted basis. This table excludes Chevron LTIP awards granted with terms similar to the broad-based employee stock options:

(thousands)			Weighted-Average — Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 1998	18,167		$ 67.94
Granted	3,388		86.05
Exercised	(7,584	)	71.35
Restored	5,735		83.83
Forfeited	(783	)	83.62
Outstanding at December 31, 1999	18,923		$ 73.99
Granted	3,763		77.18
Exercised	(1,460	)	53.99
Restored	456		78.42
Forfeited	(812	)	84.18
Outstanding at December 31, 2000	20,870		$ 75.67
Granted	3,777		89.84
Exercised	(8,209	)	78.16
Restored	6,766		89.77
Forfeited	(584	)	$ 85.76
Outstanding at December 31, 2001	22,620		$ 81.13
Exercisable at December 31
1999	12,735		$ 68.87
2000	16,021		$ 74.95
2001	19,028		$ 79.64

The following table summarizes information on stock options outstanding at December 31, 2001:

	Options Outstanding			Options Exercisable
		Weighted-
		Average	Weighted-		Weighted-
Range of	Number	Remaining	Average	Number	Average
Exercise	Outstanding	Contractual	Exercise	Exercisable	Exercise
Prices	(Thousands)	Life (Years)	Price	(Thousands)	Price
$31 to $41	153	0.5	$ 34.43	153	$ 34.43
41 to 51	2,057	2.8	45.48	2,057	45.48
51 to 61	51	5.2	56.34	51	56.34
61 to 71	739	4.8	66.28	734	66.27
71 to 81	4,871	6.4	78.96	4,871	78.96
81 to 91	10,973	7.0	86.80	7,981	86.34
91 to 101	3,776	7.4	91.81	3,181	91.62
$31 to $101	22,620	6.4	$ 81.13	19,028	$ 79.64

NOTE 22. OTHER CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS

The U.S. federal income tax liabilities have been settled through 1993 for Chevron and Caltex and through 1991 for Texaco. The company’s California franchise tax liabilities have been settled through 1991 for Chevron and 1987 for Texaco.

Settlement of open tax years, as well as tax issues in other countries where the company conducts its businesses, is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the company and, in the opinion of management, adequate provision has been made for income and franchise taxes for all open years.

At December 31, 2001, the company and its subsidiaries, as direct or indirect guarantors, had contingent liabilities of $1,118 for notes of affiliated companies and $742 for notes of others. Following the February 2002 disposition of the interests in

FS-40 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

NOTE 22. OTHER CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS – Continued

Equilon and Motiva, contingent liabilities for notes of affiliated companies were reduced by $432.

The company and its subsidiaries have certain other contingent liabilities relating to long-term unconditional purchase obligations and commitments, throughput agreements and take-or-pay agreements, some of which relate to suppliers’ financing arrangements. The aggregate amounts of required payments under these various commitments are 2002 – $1,370; 2003 – $1,402; 2004 – $1,302; 2005 – $1,179; 2006 – $1,094; 2007 and after – $1,311. Total payments under the agreements were $1,509 in 2001, $1,506 in 2000 and $1,165 in 1999.

The company has commitments related to preferred shares of subsidiary companies, which are accounted for as minority interest. MVP Production Inc., a subsidiary, has variable rate cumulative preferred shares of $75 owned by one minority holder. The shares are voting and are redeemable in 2003. Dividends on these shares were $4 in 2001, 2000 and 1999. Texaco Capital LLC, a wholly owned finance subsidiary, has issued $65 of Deferred Preferred Shares, Series C. Dividends amounting to $59 on Series C, at a rate of 7.17 percent compounded annually, will be paid at the redemption date of February 28, 2005, unless earlier redemption occurs. Early redemption may result upon the occurrence of certain specific events.

ChevronTexaco provided certain indemnities of contingent liabilities of Equilon and Motiva to Shell Oil and Saudi Refining Inc. as part of the agreement for the sale of the company’s interests in those investments. Generally, the indemnities provided are limited to contingent liabilities that may become actual liabilities within 18 months of the sale of the company’s interests, and are reduced by any reserves that were established prior to the sale. Excluding environmental liabilities, the company’s financial exposure related to those indemnities is limited to $300. Additionally, the company has provided indemnities for certain environmental liabilities arising out of conditions that existed prior to the formation of Equilon and Motiva and during the periods of ChevronTexaco’s ownership interest in those entities as well as for customary representations and warranties within the agreements.

The company is subject to loss contingencies pursuant to environmental laws and regulations that in the future may require the company to take action to correct or ameliorate the effects on the environment of prior release of chemical or petroleum substances, including MTBE, by the company or other parties. Such contingencies may exist for various sites, including but not limited to: Superfund sites and refineries, oil fields, service stations, terminals, and land development areas, whether operating, closed or sold. The amount of such future cost is indeterminable due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions that may be required, the determination of the company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties, and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties. While the company has provided for known environmental obligations that are probable and reasonably estimable, the amount of future costs may be material to results of operations in the period in which they are recognized. The company does not expect these costs will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or liquidity. Also, the company does not believe its obligations to make such expenditures have had, or will have, any significant impact on the company’s competitive position relative to other U.S. or international petroleum or chemicals concerns.

ChevronTexaco receives claims from, and submits claims to, customers, trading partners, U.S. federal, state and local regulatory bodies, host governments, contractors, insurers, and suppliers. The amounts of these claims, individually and in the aggregate, may be significant and take lengthy periods to resolve.

The company believes it has no material market or credit risks to its operations, financial position or liquidity as a result of its commodities and other derivatives activities, including forward exchange contracts and interest rate swaps. However, the results of operations and the financial position of certain equity affiliates may be affected by their business activities involving the use of derivative instruments.

The company’s operations, particularly exploration and production, can be affected by other changing economic, regulatory and political environments in the various countries in which it operates, including the United States. In certain locations, host governments have imposed restrictions, controls and taxes, and in others, political conditions have existed that may threaten the safety of employees and the company’s continued presence in those countries. Internal unrest or strained relations between a host government and the company or other governments may affect the company’s operations. Those developments have, at times, significantly affected the company’s related operations and results, and are carefully considered by management when evaluating the level of current and future activity in such countries.

For oil and gas producing operations, ownership agreements may provide for periodic reassessments of equity interests in estimated oil and gas reserves. These activities, individually or together, may result in gains or losses that could be material to earnings in any given period. One such equity redetermination process has been under way since 1996 for ChevronTexaco’s interests in four producing zones at the Naval Petroleum Reserve at Elk Hills in California, for the time when the remaining interests in these zones were owned by the U.S. Department of Energy. A wide range remains for a possible net settlement amount for the four zones. ChevronTexaco currently estimates its maximum possible net before-tax liability at less than $400. At the same time, a possible maximum net amount that could be owed to ChevronTexaco is estimated at more than $200. The timing of the settlement and the exact amount within this range of estimates are uncertain.

Areas in which the company and its affiliates have significant operations include the United States of America, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Kuwait, Republic of Congo, Angola, Nigeria, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Singapore, China, Thailand, Venezuela, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Trinidad and Korea. The company’s Tengizchevroil affiliate operates in Kazakhstan. The company’s Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC affiliate manufactures and markets a wide range of petrochemicals and plastics on a worldwide basis, with manufacturing facilities in existence or under construction in the United States, Puerto Rico, Singapore, China, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Mexico and Belgium. The company’s Dynegy affiliate has operations in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and other European countries.

FS-41 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts

NOTE 23. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)

Basic EPS includes the effects of deferrals of salary and other compensation awards that are invested in ChevronTexaco stock units by certain officers and employees of the company and is based upon net income less preferred stock dividend requirements. Diluted EPS includes the effects of these deferrals as well as the dilutive effects of outstanding stock options awarded under the company’s stock option programs (see Note 21, “Stock Options”). The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS:

	2001 — Net	Shares	Per-Share	2000 — Net	Shares	Per-Share	1999 — Net	Shares	Per-Share
	Income	(millions)	Amount	Income	(millions)	Amount	Income	(millions)	Amount
Net income	$ 3,288			$ 7,727			$ 3,247
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		1,059.3			1,066.6			1,067.7
Dividend equivalents paid on Chevron stock units	2			2			3
Deferred awards held as Chevron stock units		0.8			0.9			1.1
Preferred stock dividends	(6	)		(15	)		(29	)
BASIC EPS COMPUTATION	$ 3,284	1,060.1	$ 3.10	$ 7,714	1,067.5	$ 7.23	$ 3,221	1,068.8	$ 3.01
Dilutive effects of stock options, restricted stock and convertible debentures	4	2.8		3	2.4		3	4.8
DILUTED EPS COMPUTATION	$ 3,288	1,062.9	$ 3.09	$ 7,717	1,069.9	$ 7.21	$ 3,224	1,073.6	$ 3.00

FS-42 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Quarterly Results and Stock Market Data

Unaudited — Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts	2001 — 4TH Q		3RD Q		2ND Q		1ST Q		2000 — 4TH Q		3RD Q		2ND Q	1ST Q
REVENUES AND OTHER INCOME
Sales and other operating revenues 1	$ 21,239		$ 25,954		$ 28,597		$ 28,619		$ 31,981		$ 30,379		$ 28,695	$ 26,040
(Loss) income from equity affiliates	(38	)	320		574		288		139		427		245	266
Other income	259		217		89		127		238		384		149	187
TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER INCOME	21,460		26,491		29,260		29,034		32,358		31,190		29,089	26,493
COSTS AND OTHER DEDUCTIONS
Purchased crude oil and products, operating and other expenses	15,632		18,348		19,834		19,408		22,610		21,837		20,197	18,068
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	3,562		1,172		1,168		1,157		1,529		1,292		1,227	1,273
Taxes other than on income 1	3,557		3,702		3,940		3,957		4,311		3,530		4,058	3,928
Merger-related expenses	1,407		83		48		25		–		–		–	–
Minority interests	32		17		34		38		28		29		27	27
Interest and debt expense	171		186		217		259		267		263		284	296
TOTAL COSTS AND OTHER DEDUCTIONS	24,361		23,508		25,241		24,844		28,745		26,951		25,793	23,592
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX	(2,901	)	2,983		4,019		4,190		3,613		4,239		3,296	2,901
INCOME TAX (CREDIT) EXPENSE	(526	)	1,219		1,910		1,757		1,574		1,910		1,555	1,283
NET (LOSS) INCOME BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM	$ (2,375	)	$ 1,764		$ 2,109		$ 2,433		$ 2,039		$ 2,329		$ 1,741	$ 1,618
EXTRAORDINARY LOSS, NET OF INCOME TAX	(147	)	(496	)	–		–		–		–		–	–
NET (LOSS) INCOME 2	$ (2,522	)	$ 1,268		$ 2,109		$ 2,433		$ 2,039		$ 2,329		$ 1,741	$ 1,618
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE BEFORE
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM – BASIC	$ (2.24	)	$ 1.66		$ 1.99		$ 2.30		$ 1.93		$ 2.18		$ 1.62	$ 1.50
– DILUTED	$ (2.24	)	$ 1.66		$ 1.99		$ 2.29		$ 1.92		$ 2.17		$ 1.62	$ 1.50
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE – BASIC	$ (2.38	)	$ 1.19		$ 1.99		$ 2.30		$ 1.93		$ 2.18		$ 1.62	$ 1.50
– DILUTED	$ (2.38	)	$ 1.19		$ 1.99		$ 2.29		$ 1.92		$ 2.17		$ 1.62	$ 1.50
DIVIDENDS PAID PER SHARE 3	$ 0.70		$ 0.65		$ 0.65		$ 0.65		$ 0.65		$ 0.65		$ 0.65	$ 0.65
COMMON STOCK PRICE RANGE – HIGH	$ 93.77		$ 93.61		$ 98.49		$ 93.45		$ 88.94		$ 92.31		$ 94.88	$ 94.25
– LOW	$ 82.00		$ 78.60		$ 84.59		$ 78.44		$ 78.19		$ 76.88		$ 82.31	$ 69.94
1 Includes consumer excise taxes:	$ 1,634		$ 1,359		$ 1,771		$ 1,782		$ 1,769		$ 1,585		$ 1,679	$ 1,568
2 Net (charges) credits for special items and merger effects included in net (loss) income:	$ (3,021	)	$ (416	)	$ (64	)	$ (21	)	$ (254	)	$ (81	)	$ 40	$ (83	)
3 Chevron dividend pre-merger

In accordance with pooling-of-interests accounting, the quarterly results in the preceding table give retroactive effect to the merger, with all periods presented as if Chevron and Texaco had always been combined.

The company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (trading symbol: CVX) and on the Pacific Exchange. As of March 8, 2002, stockholders of record numbered approximately 250,000. Through October 9, 2001, the common stock traded under the name of Chevron Corporation (trading symbol: CHV).

There are no restrictions on the company’s ability to pay dividends.

FS-43 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Five-Year Financial Summary

Millions of dollars, except per-share amounts	2001			1999	1998	1997
COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA
REVENUES AND OTHER INCOME
Total sales and other operating revenues	$ 104,409	$	117,095	$ 84,004	$ 71,937	$ 99,964
Income from equity affiliates and other income	1,836		2,035	1,709	1,321	2,347
TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER INCOME	106,245		119,130	85,713	73,258	102,311
TOTAL COSTS AND OTHER DEDUCTIONS	97,954		105,081	79,901	70,422	93,118
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	8,291		14,049	5,812	2,836	9,193
INCOME TAX EXPENSE	4,360		6,322	2,565	919	3,273
INCOME BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM	$ 3,931	$	7,727	$ 3,247	$ 1,917	$ 5,920
EXTRAORDINARY LOSS, NET OF INCOME TAX	(643	)	–	–	–	–
NET INCOME	$ 3,288	$	7,727	$ 3,247	$ 1,917	$ 5,920
NET INCOME PER SHARE BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM – BASIC	$ 3.71	$	7.23	$ 3.01	$ 1.76	$ 5.54
– DILUTED	$ 3.70	$	7.21	$ 3.00	$ 1.75	$ 5.48
NET INCOME PER SHARE – BASIC	$ 3.10	$	7.23	$ 3.01	$ 1.76	$ 5.54
– DILUTED	$ 3.09	$	7.21	$ 3.00	$ 1.75	$ 5.48
CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE *	$ 2.65	$	2.60	$ 2.48	$ 2.44	$ 2.28
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT DECEMBER 31)
Current assets	$ 18,327	$	17,913	$ 17,043	$ 14,157	$ 16,161
Noncurrent assets	59,245		59,708	58,337	55,967	53,699
Total assets	77,572		77,621	75,380	70,124	69,860
Short-term debt	8,429		3,094	6,063	5,579	4,076
Other current liabilities	12,225		13,567	11,620	9,480	11,520
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations	8,989		12,821	13,145	11,675	10,708
Other noncurrent liabilities	13,971		14,770	14,761	14,523	13,318
Total liabilities	43,614		44,252	45,589	41,257	39,622
Stockholders’ equity	$ 33,958	$	33,369	$ 29,791	$ 28,867	$ 30,238

• Chevron dividend pre-merger.

Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities

Unaudited

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69, “Disclosures About Oil and Gas Producing Activities” (FAS 69), this section provides supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and producing activities of the company in seven separate tables. Tables I through IV provide historical cost information pertaining to costs incurred in exploration, property acquisitions and development; capitalized costs; and results of operations. Tables V through VII present information on the company’s estimated net proved reserve quantities, standardized measure of estimated discounted future net cash flows related to proved reserves, and changes in estimated discounted future net cash flows. The Africa geographic area includes activities principally in Nigeria, Angola, Chad, Congo and Democratic Republic of Congo. The Asia-Pacific geographic area includes activities principally in Australia, China, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Papua New Guinea, Philippines and Thailand. The “Other” geographic category includes activities in the United Kingdom, Canada, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, Trinidad, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina and other countries. Amounts shown for affiliated companies are ChevronTexaco’s 50 percent equity share of Tengizchevroil (TCO), an exploration and production partnership operating in the Republic of Kazakhstan, and a 30 percent equity share of Hamaca, an exploration and production partnership operating in Venezuela, beginning in 2000. The company increased its ownership in TCO from 45 percent to 50 percent in January 2001.

FS-44 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

TABLE I – COSTS INCURRED IN EXPLORATION, PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS AND DEVELOPMENT 1

Millions of dollars	Consolidated Companies — U.S.	Africa	Asia-Pacific	Other	Total	Affiliated Companies — TCO 2	Hamaca	Worldwide
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
Exploration
Wells	$ 620	$ 172	$ 186	$ 197	$ 1,175	$ –	$ –	$ 1,175
Geological and geophysical	46	35	42	65	188	–	–	188
Rentals and other	65	48	15	98	226	–	–	226
Total exploration	731	255	243	360	1,589	–	–	1,589
Property acquisitions 3
Proved 4	25	4	–	–	29	362	–	391
Unproved	50	38	12	–	100	108	–	208
Total property acquisitions	75	42	12	–	129	470	–	599
Development	1,754	551	1,168	494	3,967	266	275	4,508
TOTAL COSTS INCURRED	$ 2,560	$ 848	$ 1,423	$ 854	$ 5,685	$ 736	$ 275	$ 6,696
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
Exploration
Wells	$ 526	$ 139	$ 179	$ 63	$ 907	$ –	$ –	$ 907
Geological and geophysical	60	35	67	105	267	–	–	267
Rentals and other	73	43	55	83	254	–	–	254
Total exploration	659	217	301	251	1,428	–	–	1,428
Property acquisitions 3
Proved 4	162	1	278	1	442	–	–	442
Unproved	66	9	–	184	259	–	–	259
Total property acquisitions	228	10	278	185	701	–	–	701
Development	1,453	435	1,067	718	3,673	240	–	3,913
TOTAL COSTS INCURRED	$ 2,340	$ 662	$ 1,646	$ 1,154	$ 5,802	$ 240	$ –	$ 6,042
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
Exploration
Wells	$ 361	$ 115	$ 132	$ 94	$ 702	$ –	$ –	$ 702
Geological and geophysical	87	48	65	94	294	–	–	294
Rentals and other	81	40	70	57	248	–	–	248
Total exploration	529	203	267	245	1,244	–	–	1,244
Property acquisitions 3,5
Proved 4	13	–	687	864	1,564	–	–	1,564
Unproved	66	38	750	477	1,331	–	–	1,331
Total property acquisitions	79	38	1,437	1,341	2,895	–	–	2,895
Development	1,230	540	829	606	3,205	148	–	3,353
TOTAL COSTS INCURRED	$ 1,838	$ 781	$ 2,533	$ 2,192	$ 7,344	$ 148	$ –	$ 7,492

| 1 | Includes costs incurred whether capitalized or expensed. Excludes support
equipment expenditures. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Includes acquisition costs for an additional 5 percent interest in 2001. |
| 3 | Proved amounts include wells, equipment and facilities associated with proved
reserves. |
| 4 | Does not include properties acquired through property exchanges. |
| 5 | Includes acquisition costs and related deferred income taxes for purchases of
Rutherford-Moran Oil Corporation and Petrolera Argentina San Jorge S.A. |

FS-45 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities – Continued

Unaudited

TABLE II – CAPITALIZED COSTS RELATED TO OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES

Millions of dollars	Consolidated Companies — U.S.	Africa	Asia-Pacific	Other	Total	Affiliated Companies — TCO	Hamaca*	Worldwide
AT DECEMBER 31, 2001
Unproved properties	$ 753	$ 304	$ 565	$ 1,168	$ 2,790	$ 108	$ –	$ 2,898
Proved properties and related producing assets	35,665	5,487	10,332	9,435	60,919	1,878	88	62,885
Support equipment	766	390	2,177	313	3,646	293	–	3,939
Deferred exploratory wells	91	450	128	114	783	–	–	783
Other uncompleted projects	1,080	690	654	437	2,861	245	376	3,482
GROSS CAPITALIZED COSTS	38,355	7,321	13,856	11,467	70,999	2,524	464	73,987
Unproved properties valuation	382	86	73	222	763	–	–	763
Proved producing properties – Depreciation and depletion	25,844	2,998	4,733	4,827	38,402	219	3	38,624
Future abandonment and restoration	1,016	449	281	342	2,088	19	–	2,107
Support equipment depreciation	452	160	1,122	162	1,896	123	–	2,019
Accumulated provisions	27,694	3,693	6,209	5,553	43,149	361	3	43,513
NET CAPITALIZED COSTS	$ 10,661	$ 3,628	$ 7,647	$ 5,914	$ 27,850	$ 2,163	$ 461	$ 30,474
AT DECEMBER 31, 2000
Unproved properties	$ 1,233	$ 176	$ 540	$ 1,219	$ 3,168	$ 378	$ 63	$ 3,609
Proved properties and related producing assets	34,587	5,050	8,905	8,702	57,244	1,158	71	58,473
Support equipment	721	366	2,126	272	3,485	254	42	3,781
Deferred exploratory wells	182	407	120	161	870	–	–	870
Other uncompleted projects	741	640	674	570	2,625	136	–	2,761
GROSS CAPITALIZED COSTS	37,464	6,639	12,365	10,924	67,392	1,926	176	69,494
Unproved properties valuation	317	69	66	170	622	–	–	622
Proved producing properties – Depreciation and depletion	23,528	2,700	3,986	3,940	34,154	131	–	34,285
Future abandonment and restoration	1,071	413	274	317	2,075	13	–	2,088
Support equipment depreciation	380	141	1,224	172	1,917	97	1	2,015
Accumulated provisions	25,296	3,323	5,550	4,599	38,768	241	1	39,010
NET CAPITALIZED COSTS	$ 12,168	$ 3,316	$ 6,815	$ 6,325	$ 28,624	$ 1,685	$ 175	$ 30,484
AT DECEMBER 31, 1999
Unproved properties	$ 1,190	$ 185	$ 617	$ 1,204	$ 3,196	$ 378	$ –	$ 3,574
Proved properties and related producing assets	36,614	4,442	6,745	10,657	58,458	689	–	59,147
Support equipment	913	322	2,151	244	3,630	243	–	3,873
Deferred exploratory wells	196	304	169	141	810	–	–	810
Other uncompleted projects	822	758	969	633	3,182	405	–	3,587
GROSS CAPITALIZED COSTS	39,735	6,011	10,651	12,879	69,276	1,715	–	70,991
Unproved properties valuation	282	54	82	109	527	–	–	527
Proved producing properties – Depreciation and depletion	25,301	2,317	3,376	5,770	36,764	99	–	36,863
Future abandonment and restoration	1,189	383	252	535	2,359	10	–	2,369
Support equipment depreciation	321	114	1,083	76	1,594	80	–	1,674
Accumulated provisions	27,093	2,868	4,793	6,490	41,244	189	–	41,433
NET CAPITALIZED COSTS	$ 12,642	$ 3,143	$ 5,858	$ 6,389	$ 28,032	$ 1,526	$ –	$ 29,558

• Existing costs were transferred from a consolidated subsidiary to an affiliate at year-end 2000. Previously reported in Consolidated Companies – Other.

FS-46 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

TABLE III – RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES 1

The company’s results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the years 2001, 2000 and 1999 are shown in the following table. Net income from exploration and production activities as reported on page FS-5 reflects income taxes computed on an effective rate basis. In accordance with FAS No. 69, income taxes in Table III are based on statutory tax rates, reflecting allowable deductions and tax credits. Interest income and expense are excluded from the results reported in Table III and from the net income amounts on page FS-5.

	Consolidated Companies
				Asia-
Millions of dollars	U.S.	Africa		Pacific		Other		Total		TCO			Hamaca	Worldwide
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
Revenues from net production
Sales	$ 5,024	$	1,147	$	1,264	$	2,181	$	9,616	$	673		$ 6	$	10,295
Transfers	3,991		1,913		2,796		1,107		9,807		–		–		9,807
Total	9,015		3,060		4,060		3,288		19,423		673		6		20,102
Production expenses	(2,272	)	(447	)	(856	)	(687	)	(4,262	)	(142	)	(6	)	(4,410	)
Proved producing properties: depreciation, depletion and abandonment provision	(1,614	)	(344	)	(498	)	(658	)	(3,114	)	(80	)	$ (1	)	(3,195	)
Exploration expenses	(424	)	(132	)	(234	)	(298	)	(1,088	)	–		–		(1,088	)
Unproved properties valuation	(38	)	(33	)	(9	)	(77	)	(157	)	–		–		(157	)
Other (expense) income 2	(1,823	)	(110	)	(209	)	(5	)	(2,147	)	9		2		(2,136	)
Results before income taxes	2,844		1,994		2,254		1,563		8,655		460		1		9,116
Income tax expense	(1,074	)	(1,455	)	(1,432	)	(620	)	(4,581	)	(138	)	–		(4,719	)
RESULTS OF PRODUCING OPERATIONS	$ 1,770	$	539	$	822	$	943	$	4,074	$	322		$ 1	$	4,397
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
Revenues from net production
Sales	$ 5,878	$	2,804	$	1,404	$	2,310	$	12,396	$	710		$ –	$	13,106
Transfers	4,387		650		3,203		1,409		9,649		–		–		9,649
Total	10,265		3,454		4,607		3,719		22,045		710		–		22,755
Production expenses	(2,182	)	(405	)	(865	)	(727	)	(4,179	)	(114	)	–		(4,293	)
Proved producing properties: depreciation, depletion and abandonment provision	(1,558	)	(337	)	(585	)	(676	)	(3,156	)	(53	)	–		(3,209	)
Exploration expenses	(395	)	(166	)	(176	)	(217	)	(954	)	–		–		(954	)
Unproved properties valuation	(49	)	(16	)	(7	)	(75	)	(147	)	–		–		(147	)
Other (expense) income 2	(631	)	45		(13	)	237		(362	)	(56	)	–		(418	)
Results before income taxes	5,450		2,575		2,961		2,261		13,247		487		–		13,734
Income tax expense	(1,927	)	(1,974	)	(1,724	)	(984	)	(6,609	)	(146	)	–		(6,755	)
RESULTS OF PRODUCING OPERATIONS	$ 3,523	$	601	$	1,237	$	1,277	$	6,638	$	341		$ –	$	6,979
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
Revenues from net production
Sales	$ 3,411	$	1,756	$	861	$	1,548	$	7,576	$	356		$ –	$	7,932
Transfers	2,830		446		2,108		948		6,332		–		–		6,332
Total	6,241		2,202		2,969		2,496		13,908		356		–		14,264
Production expenses	(1,948	)	(394	)	(747	)	(747	)	(3,836	)	(88	)	–		(3,924	)
Proved producing properties: depreciation, depletion and abandonment provision	(1,527	)	(338	)	(469	)	(624	)	(2,958	)	(47	)	–		(3,005	)
Exploration expenses	(410	)	(164	)	(286	)	(227	)	(1,087	)	–		–		(1,087	)
Unproved properties valuation	(53	)	(8	)	(26	)	(30	)	(117	)	–		–		(117	)
Other (expense) income 2	(585	)	(61	)	(69	)	5		(710	)	(9	)	–		(719	)
Results before income taxes	1,718		1,237		1,372		873		5,200		212		–		5,412
Income tax expense	(539	)	(848	)	(852	)	(452	)	(2,691	)	(63	)	–		(2,754	)
RESULTS OF PRODUCING OPERATIONS	$ 1,179	$	389	$	520	$	421	$	2,509	$	149		$ –	$	2,658

| 1 | The value of owned production consumed as fuel has been eliminated from
revenues and production expenses, and the related volumes have been deducted
from net production in calculating the unit average sales price and production
cost. This has no effect on the results of producing operations. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Includes gas processing fees, net sulfur income, foreign currency transaction
gains and losses, certain significant impairment write-downs, miscellaneous
expenses, etc. Also includes net income from related oil and gas activities
that do not have oil and gas reserves attributed to them (for example, net
income from technical and operating service agreements) and items identified in
the Management’s Discussion and Analysis on pages FS-5 and FS-6. |

FS-47 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities – Continued

Unaudited

TABLE IV – RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES – UNIT PRICES AND COSTS 1,2

	Consolidated Companies — U.S.	Africa	Asia-Pacific	Other	Total	Affiliated Companies — TCO	Hamaca	Worldwide
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
Average sales prices
Liquids, per barrel	$ 21.34	$ 23.70	$ 20.11	$ 22.59	$ 21.68	$ 13.31	$ 12.45	$ 21.08
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet	4.38	0.04	3.04	2.51	3.78	0.47	–	3.69
Average production costs, per barrel	5.90	3.39	4.20	4.17	4.81	2.54	13.09	4.68
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
Average sales prices
Liquids per barrel	$ 25.61	$ 26.58	$ 22.97	$ 27.34	$ 25.35	$ 20.14	$ –	$ 25.09
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet	3.87	0.03	2.57	2.29	3.39	0.13	–	3.33
Average production costs, per barrel	5.23	3.04	4.17	4.49	4.55	2.91	–	4.48
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
Average sales prices
Liquids, per barrel	$ 14.92	$ 17.39	$ 14.67	$ 16.94	$ 15.63	$ 10.53	$ –	$ 15.40
Natural gas, per thousand cubic feet	2.12	0.05	1.86	1.83	2.02	0.38	–	2.00
Average production costs, per barrel	4.37	3.06	3.61	4.48	4.04	2.39	–	3.98

| 1 | The value of owned production consumed as fuel has been eliminated from
revenues and production expenses, and the related volumes have been deducted
from net production in calculating the unit average sales price and production
cost. This has no effect on the results of producing operations. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 | Natural gas converted to crude oil-equivalent gas (OEG) barrels at a rate of
6 MCF=1 OEG barrel. |

TABLE V – RESERVE QUANTITY INFORMATION

The company’s estimated net proved underground oil and gas reserves and changes thereto for the years 2001, 2000 and 1999 are shown in the following table. Proved reserves are estimated by company asset teams composed of earth scientists and reservoir engineers. These proved reserve estimates are reviewed annually by the company’s Reserves Advisory Committee to ensure that rigorous professional standards and the reserves definitions prescribed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission are consistently applied throughout the company.

Proved reserves are the estimated quantities that geologic and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, estimates of underground reserves are subject to change as additional information becomes available.

Proved reserves do not include additional quantities recoverable beyond the term of the lease or concession agreement or that may result from extensions of currently proved areas or from applying secondary or tertiary recovery processes not yet tested and determined to be economic.

Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.

“Net” reserves exclude royalties and interests owned by others and reflect contractual arrangements and royalty obligations in effect at the time of the estimate.

FS-48 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

TABLE V – RESERVE QUANTITY INFORMATION – Continued

ChevronTexaco operates, under a risked service agreement, Venezuela’s Block LL-652, located in the northeast section of Lake Maracaibo. ChevronTexaco is accounting for LL-652 as an oil and gas activity and, at December 31, 2001, had recorded 18 million barrels of proved crude oil reserves.

No reserve quantities have been recorded for the company’s other service agreements – the Boscan Field in Venezuela and a long-term purchase agreement associated with a service agreement for the Chuchupa Field in Colombia for the period 2005 – 2016.

NET PROVED RESERVES OF CRUDE OIL, CONDENSATE AND NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS
Million of barrels
Consolidated Companies										Affiliates
				Asia-										World-
U.S.		Africa		Pacific		Other		Total		TCO		Hamaca		wide
RESERVES AT JANUARY 1, 1999	2,972		1,359		2,082		782		7,195		1,075		–		8,270
Changes attributable to:
Revisions	(12	)	4		(178	)	31		(155	)	115		–		(40	)
Improved recovery	78		62		112		21		273		–		–		273
Extensions and discoveries	116		47		27		49		239		76		–		315
Purchases 1	35		–		59		177		271		–		–		271
Sales 2	(76	)	–		–		(2	)	(78	)	–		–		(78	)
Production	(259	)	(128	)	(215	)	(112	)	(714	)	(33	)	–		(747	)
RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 1999	2,854		1,344		1,887		946		7,031		1,233		–		8,264
Changes attributable to:
Revisions	(26	)	48		109		14		145		105		–		250
Improved recovery	83		20		69		9		181		–		–		181
Extensions and discoveries	85		92		40		57		274		7		374		655
Purchases 1	8		131		–		3		142		–		–		142
Sales 2	(146	)	–		–		(96	)	(242	)	–		–		(242	)
Production	(244	)	(130	)	(211	)	(111	)	(696	)	(35	)	–		(731	)
RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 2000	2,614		1,505		1,894		822		6,835		1,310		374		8,519
Changes attributable to:
Revisions	(225	)	45		135		(60	)	(105	)	46		(2	)	(61	)
Improved recovery	79		35		47		51		212		–		–		212
Extensions and discoveries	67		88		34		40		229		88		115		432
Purchases 1	1		–		–		–		1		146		–		147
Sales 2	(11	)	–		–		–		(11	)	–		–		(11	)
Production	(224	)	(129	)	(204	)	(108	)	(665	)	(49	)	–		(714	)
RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 2001	2,301		1,544		1,906		745		6,496		1,541		487		8,524
Developed reserves
At January 1, 1999	2,397		941		1,477		482		5,297		646		–		5,943
At December 31, 1999	2,266		980		1,314		636		5,196		790		–		5,986
At December 31, 2000	2,083		976		1,276		538		4,873		795		–		5,668
At December 31, 2001	1,887		923		1,491		517		4,818		1,007		38		5,863

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]

NET PROVED RESERVES OF NATURAL GAS
Billions of cubic feet
Consolidated Companies										Affiliates
				Asia-									World-
U.S.		Africa		Pacific		Other		Total		TCO		Hamaca	wide
RESERVES AT JANUARY 1, 1999	8,602		292		2,660		2,882		14,436		1,384		–	15,820
Changes attributable to:
Revisions	(141	)	49		411		251		570		126		–	696
Improved recovery	11		–		237		10		258		–		–	258
Extensions and discoveries	789		–		51		186		1,026		98		–	1,124
Purchases 1	35		–		901		183		1,119		–		–	1,119
Sales 2	(155	)	–		–		–		(155	)	–		–	(155	)
Production	(1,148	)	(15	)	(172	)	(337	)	(1,672	)	(27	)	–	(1,699	)
RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 1999	7,993		326		4,088		3,175		15,582		1,581		–	17,163
Changes attributable to:
Revisions	92		450		308		67		917		126		–	1,043
Improved recovery	17		–		–		5		22		–		–	22
Extensions and discoveries	990		1		236		143		1,370		9		33	1,412
Purchases 1	262		12		–		–		274		–		–	274
Sales 2	(367	)	–		–		(70	)	(437	)	–		–	(437	)
Production	(1,064	)	(17	)	(190	)	(329	)	(1,600	)	(33	)	–	(1,633	)
RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 2000	7,923		772		4,442		2,991		16,128		1,683		33	17,844
Changes attributable to:
Revisions	(20	)	780		330		(10	)	1,080		317		–	1,397
Improved recovery	24		7		11		16		58		–		–	58
Extensions and discoveries	587		329		164		445		1,525		130		9	1,664
Purchases 1	41		–		6		6		53		187		–	240
Sales 2	(180	)	–		–		–		(180	)	–		–	(180	)
Production	(988	)	(16	)	(194	)	(360	)	(1,558	)	(55	)	–	(1,613	)
RESERVES AT DECEMBER 31, 2001	7,387		1,872		4,759		3,088		17,106		2,262		42	19,410
Developed reserves
At January 1, 1999	7,262		266		1,894		2,125		11,547		832		–	12,379
At December 31, 1999	6,733		276		2,342		2,368		11,719		1,011		–	12,730
At December 31, 2000	6,408		294		3,108		2,347		12,157		1,019		–	13,176
At December 31, 2001	6,246		444		3,170		2,231		12,091		1,477		6	13,574

1	Includes reserves acquired through property exchanges.
2	Includes reserves disposed of through property exchanges.

INFORMATION ON CANADIAN OIL SANDS NET PROVED RESERVES NOT INCLUDED ABOVE:

In addition to conventional liquids and natural gas proved reserves, ChevronTexaco has significant interests in proved oil sands reserves in Canada associated with the Athabasca project. For internal management purposes, ChevronTexaco views these reserves and their development as an integral part of total upstream operations. However, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regulations define these reserves as mining-related and not a part of conventional oil and gas reserves. Net proved oil sands reserves were 186 million barrels as of December 31, 2001. Production is expected to begin in late 2002.

The oil sands reserves are not considered in the standardized measure of discounted cash flows for conventional oil and gas reserves, which is found on page FS-50.

FS-49 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities – Continued

Unaudited

TABLE VI – STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS RELATED TO PROVED OIL AND GAS RESERVES

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, related to the preceding proved oil and gas reserves, is calculated in accordance with the requirements of FAS No. 69. Estimated future cash inflows from production are computed by applying year-end prices for oil and gas to year-end quantities of estimated net proved reserves. Future price changes are limited to those provided by contractual arrangements in existence at the end of each reporting year. Future development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures necessary to develop and produce year-end estimated proved reserves based on year-end cost indices, assuming continuation of year-end economic conditions. Estimated future income taxes are calculated by applying appropriate year-end statutory tax rates. These rates reflect allowable deductions and tax credits and are applied to estimated future pretax net cash flows, less the tax basis of related assets. Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using 10 percent midperiod discount factors. Discounting requires a year-by-year estimate of when future expenditures will be incurred and when reserves will be produced.

The information provided does not represent management’s estimate of the company’s expected future cash flows or value of proved oil and gas reserves. Estimates of proved reserve quantities are imprecise and change over time as new information becomes available. Moreover, probable and possible reserves, which may become proved in the future, are excluded from the calculations. The arbitrary valuation prescribed under FAS No. 69 requires assumptions as to the timing and amount of future development and production costs. The calculations are made as of December 31 each year and should not be relied upon as an indication of the company’s future cash flows or value of its oil and gas reserves.

	Consolidated Companies
				Asia-
Millions of dollars	U.S.	Africa		Pacific		Other		Total		TCO		Hamaca		Worldwide
AT DECEMBER 31, 2001
Future cash inflows from production	$ 54,238	$	28,019	$	43,389	$	20,432	$	146,078	$	29,433	$	5,922	$	181,433
Future production and development costs	(30,871	)	(10,106	)	(20,845	)	(8,873	)	(70,695	)	(8,865	)	(1,093	)	(80,653	)
Future income taxes	(7,981	)	(10,476	)	(9,858	)	(4,370	)	(32,685	)	(5,805	)	(1,642	)	(40,132	)
Undiscounted future net cash flows	15,386		7,437		12,686		7,189		42,698		14,763		3,187		60,648
10 percent midyear annual discount for timing of estimated cash flows	(6,882	)	(3,609	)	(5,857	)	(2,602	)	(18,950	)	(9,121	)	(2,433	)	(30,504	)
STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS	$ 8,504	$	3,828	$	6,829	$	4,587	$	23,748	$	5,642	$	754	$	30,144
AT DECEMBER 31, 2000
Future cash inflows from production	$ 127,945	$	34,856	$	47,351	$	27,426	$	237,578	$	30,350	$	3,917	$	271,845
Future production and development costs	(30,305	)	(8,023	)	(18,416	)	(7,466	)	(64,210	)	(7,250	)	(679	)	(72,139	)
Future income taxes	(33,614	)	(16,124	)	(13,245	)	(7,481	)	(70,464	)	(6,440	)	(1,101	)	(78,005	)
Undiscounted future net cash flows	64,026		10,709		15,690		12,479		102,904		16,660		2,137		121,701
10 percent midyear annual discount for timing of estimated cash flows	(27,747	)	(4,186	)	(6,764	)	(4,405	)	(43,102	)	(11,180	)	(1,431	)	(55,713	)
STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS	$ 36,279	$	6,523	$	8,926	$	8,074	$	59,802	$	5,480	$	706	$	65,988
AT DECEMBER 31, 1999
Future cash inflows from production	$ 76,931	$	33,218	$	45,358	$	27,973	$	183,480	$	24,380	$	–	$	207,860
Future production and development costs	(26,159	)	(6,430	)	(17,136	)	(8,802	)	(58,527	)	(4,900	)	–		(63,427	)
Future income taxes	(15,354	)	(17,178	)	(13,553	)	(6,970	)	(53,055	)	(4,980	)	–		(58,035	)
Undiscounted future net cash flows	35,418		9,610		14,669		12,201		71,898		14,500		–		86,398
10 percent midyear annual discount for timing of estimated cash flows	(16,296	)	(2,996	)	(6,249	)	(4,607	)	(30,148	)	(10,400	)	–		(40,548	)
STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS	$ 19,122	$	6,614	$	8,420	$	7,594	$	41,750	$	4,100	$	–	$	45,850

FS-50 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

TABLE VII – CHANGES IN THE STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS FROM PROVED RESERVES

Millions of dollars	Consolidated Companies — 2001	2000		1999		2001		2000		1999		2001		2000		1999
PRESENT VALUE AT JANUARY 1	$ 59,802	$	41,750	$	14,447	$	6,186	$	4,100	$	310	$	65,988	$	45,850	$	14,757
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs	(15,161	)	(17,866	)	(10,072	)	(531	)	(596	)	(268	)	(15,692	)	(18,462	)	(10,340	)
Development costs incurred	3,967		3,673		3,205		541		240		148		4,508		3,913		3,353
Purchases of reserves	40		2,055		3,706		778		–		–		818		2,055		3,706
Sales of reserves	(366	)	(5,010	)	(696	)	–		–		–		(366	)	(5,010	)	(696	)
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs	2,747		8,710		4,866		484		1,112		226		3,231		9,822		5,092
Revisions of previous quantity estimates	524		(428	)	(856	)	400		1,284		738		924		856		(118	)
Net changes in prices, development and production costs	(59,995	)	29,358		49,264		(2,457	)	457		4,650		(62,452	)	29,815		53,914
Accretion of discount	10,144		7,027		2,131		876		582		50		11,020		7,609		2,181
Net change in income tax	22,046		(9,467	)	(24,246	)	119		(993	)	(1,753	)	22,165		(10,460	)	(25,999	)
Net change for the year	(36,054	)	18,052		27,302		210		2,086		3,791		(35,844	)	20,138		31,093
VALUE AT DECEMBER 31	$ 23,748	$	59,802	$	41,749	$	6,396	$	6,186	$	4,101	$	30,144	$	65,988	$	45,850

The changes in present values between years, which can be significant, reflect changes in estimated proved reserve quantities and prices and assumptions used in forecasting production volumes and costs. Changes in the timing of production are included with “Revisions of previous quantity estimates.”

FS-51 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

link1 "EXHIBIT INDEX"

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
3.1*	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
ChevronTexaco Corporation, dated October 9, 2001.
3.2	By-Laws of ChevronTexaco Corporation, as amended
April 25, 2001, filed as Exhibit 3 to ChevronTexaco
Corporation’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by
reference.
4.1	Rights Agreement dated as of November 23,
1998, between ChevronTexaco Corporation and ChaseMellon
Shareholder Services L.L.C., as Rights Agent, filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to ChevronTexaco Corporation’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated November 23, 1998, and
incorporated herein by reference.
4.2	Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated as
of October 15, 2000, between ChevronTexaco Corporation and
ChaseMellon Shareholder Services L.L.C., as Rights Agent, filed
as Exhibit 4.2 to ChevronTexaco Corporation’s
Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated December 7,
2000, and incorporated herein by reference.
	Pursuant to the Instructions to Exhibits, certain
instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt
securities of the corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries
are not filed because the total amount of securities authorized
under any such instrument does not exceed 10 percent of the
total assets of the corporation and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. A copy of such instrument will be furnished
to the Commission upon request.
10.1	ChevronTexaco Corporation Deferred Compensation
Plan for Directors, as amended and restated effective
January 1, 2001, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
ChevronTexaco Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000, and incorporated
herein by reference.
10.2	Management Incentive Plan of ChevronTexaco
Corporation, as amended and restated effective October 30,
1996, filed as Appendix B to ChevronTexaco
Corporation’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
Proxy Statement dated March 21, 1997, and incorporated
herein by reference.
10.3	ChevronTexaco Corporation Excess Benefit Plan,
amended and restated as of July 1, 1996, filed as
Exhibit 10 to ChevronTexaco Corporation’s Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
1997, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.4	ChevronTexaco Restricted Stock Plan for
Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated effective
April 30, 1997, filed as Appendix A to ChevronTexaco
Corporation’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
Proxy Statement dated March 21, 1997, and incorporated
herein by reference.
10.5	ChevronTexaco Corporation Long-Term Incentive
Plan, as amended and restated effective October 30, 1996,
filed as Appendix C to ChevronTexaco Corporation’s
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
dated March 21, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6	ChevronTexaco Corporation Salary Deferral Plan
for Management Employees, effective January 1, 1997, filed
as Exhibit 10 to ChevronTexaco Corporation’s Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
1997, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.7	Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
October 15, 2000, among Texaco Inc., ChevronTexaco
Corporation and Keepep Inc., filed as Exhibit 2.1 to a
Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the company on
October 16, 2000 and an amended Current Report on
Form 8-K filed by the company on October 16, 2000, and
incorporated herein by reference.

E-1 PAGEBREAK

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

(continued)

Exhibit No.	Description
10.8	Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of March 30, 2001, among Texaco Inc.,
ChevronTexaco Corporation and Keepep Inc., filed as Annex A-1 to
Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-4 filed by ChevronTexaco Corporation on
August 27, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.10	Stock Option Agreement dated as of
October 15, 2000 between ChevronTexaco Corporation and
Texaco Inc., filed as Exhibit 2.2 to a Current Report on
Form 8-K filed by the company on October 16, 2000, and
an amended Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the company
on October 16, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11	Stock Option Agreement dated as of
October 15, 2000 between ChevronTexaco Corporation and
Texaco Inc., filed as Exhibit 2.3 to a Current Report on
Form 8-K filed by the company on October 16, 2000, and
an amended Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the company
on October 16, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12*	Employment Agreement dated as of December 4,
2001 between ChevronTexaco Corporation and Glenn Tilton.
10.13*	Texaco Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, adopted
May 9, 1989, as amended May 13, 1993, and May 13, 1997.
10.14*	Supplemental Pension Plan of Texaco Inc., dated
June 26, 1975.
10.15*	Supplemental Bonus Retirement Plan of Texaco
Inc., dated May 1, 1981.
10.16*	Texaco Inc. Director and Employee Deferral Plan
approved March 28, 1997.
12.1*	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(page E-3).
21.1*	Subsidiaries of ChevronTexaco Corporation (page
E-4).
23.1*	Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (page E-5).
23.2*	Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP (page E-6).
24.1 to 24.17	Powers of Attorney for directors and certain
officers of ChevronTexaco Corporation, authorizing the signing
of the Annual Report on Form 10-K on their behalf.
99.1*	Definitions of Selected Financial Terms (page
E-7).
99.2	Decision and Order of the Federal Trade
Commission filed as Exhibit 99.2 to ChevronTexaco
Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
September 10, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
99.3*	Letter to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of
Regulation S-X. (page E-8)

• Filed herewith.

On October 9, 2001, the company changed its name from Chevron Corporation to ChevronTexaco Corporation. Filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to that date may be found under the company’s former name.

Copies of above exhibits not contained herein are available, at a fee of $2 per document, to any security holder upon written request to the Secretary’s Department, ChevronTexaco Corporation, 575 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105.

E-2