Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

CHEMED CORP Interim / Quarterly Report 2017

Apr 28, 2017

30858_10-q_2017-04-28_bcb695a9-f06f-443d-ba6b-ca5355175e49.zip

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

10-Q 1 a51546341.htm CHEMED CORP. 10-Q Licensed to: Business Wire Document created using EDGARfilings PROfile 4.2.1.0 Copyright 1995 - 2017 Summit Financial Printing, LLC. All rights reserved.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2017

☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number: 1-8351

CHEMED CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 31-0791746
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
255 E. Fifth Street, Suite 2600, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(513) 762-6690

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended the extended transition period for complying with a new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class Amount Date
Capital Stock $1 Par Value 16,082,181 Shares March 31, 2017

-1-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND

SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

Index

Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Item 1. Financial Statements
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets -
March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 3
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income -
Three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 4
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
Three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 5
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements 6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 25
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 25
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 25
Item 1A. Risk Factors 25
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 26
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 26
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 26
Item 5. Other Information 26
Item 6. Exhibits 27
EX – 31.1
EX – 31.2
EX – 31.3
EX – 32.1
EX – 32.2
EX – 32.3
EX – 101.INS
EX – 101.SCH
EX – 101.CAL
EX – 101.DEF
EX – 101.LAB
EX – 101.PRE

-2-

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 47,049 $ 15,310
Accounts receivable less allowances of $15,908 (2016 - $14,236) 109,726 132,021
Inventories 5,433 5,755
Prepaid income taxes 1,663 3,709
Prepaid expenses 12,102 13,105
Total current assets 175,973 169,900
Investments of deferred compensation plans 56,596 54,389
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $216,423 (2016 - $211,290) 119,394 121,302
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of $32,794 (2016 - $33,225) 54,976 55,065
Goodwill 472,391 472,366
Other assets 6,901 7,037
Total Assets $ 886,231 $ 880,059
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 29,341 $ 39,586
Current portion of long-term debt 9,375 8,750
Income taxes 12,614 -
Accrued insurance 54,150 47,960
Accrued compensation 37,382 53,979
Accrued legal 2,471 1,805
Other current liabilities 19,050 19,752
Total current liabilities 164,383 171,832
Deferred income taxes 11,875 14,291
Long-term debt 137,500 100,000
Deferred compensation liabilities 56,024 54,288
Other liabilities 15,805 15,549
Total Liabilities 385,587 355,960
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Capital stock - authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 34,404,220 shares (2016 - 34,270,104 shares) 34,404 34,270
Paid-in capital 651,269 639,703
Retained earnings 983,742 958,149
Treasury stock - 18,407,027 shares (2016 - 18,083,527) (1,170,933 ) (1,110,536 )
Deferred compensation payable in Company stock 2,162 2,513
Total Stockholders' Equity 500,644 524,099
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $ 886,231 $ 880,059
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

-3-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016
Service revenues and sales $ 405,864 $ 390,389
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation) 285,140 278,435
Selling, general and administrative expenses 69,458 59,045
Depreciation 8,893 8,424
Amortization 46 92
Other operating expenses 873 -
Total costs and expenses 364,410 345,996
Income from operations 41,454 44,393
Interest expense (995 ) (842 )
Other income/(expense) - net 2,463 (2,924 )
Income before income taxes 42,922 40,627
Income taxes (13,078 ) (15,787 )
Net income $ 29,844 $ 24,840
Earnings Per Share
Net income $ 1.84 $ 1.49
Average number of shares outstanding 16,219 16,720
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net income $ 1.78 $ 1.45
Average number of shares outstanding 16,801 17,170
Cash Dividends Per Share $ 0.26 $ 0.24
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

-4-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income $ 29,844 $ 24,840
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 8,939 8,516
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable 4,249 4,242
Stock option expense 3,001 2,563
Benefit for deferred income taxes (2,415 ) (4,202 )
Noncash long-term incentive compensation 827 (305 )
Amortization of restricted stock awards 336 539
Amortization of debt issuance costs 129 130
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable 17,972 (41,050 )
Decrease in inventories 322 212
Decrease in prepaid expenses 1,003 546
Decrease in accounts payable and other current liabilities (10,766 ) (7,567 )
Increase in income taxes 14,655 19,448
Increase/(decrease) in other assets (2,140 ) 410
Increase/(decrease) in other liabilities 1,992 (140 )
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation - (900 )
Other sources/(uses) 838 (59 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 68,786 7,223
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures (9,020 ) (11,473 )
Other sources/(uses) (70 ) 153
Net cash used by investing activities (9,090 ) (11,320 )
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from revolving line of credit 116,000 59,000
Payments on revolving line of credit (76,000 ) (3,500 )
Purchases of treasury stock (54,262 ) (52,460 )
Change in cash overdrafts payable (8,607 ) 7,061
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 5,635 2,887
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation (4,744 ) (4,020 )
Dividends paid (4,251 ) (4,081 )
Payments on other long-term debt (1,875 ) (1,875 )
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation - 900
Other sources 147 693
Net cash (used)/provided by financing activities (27,957 ) 4,605
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 31,739 508
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 15,310 14,727
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 47,049 $ 15,235
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

-5-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

  1. Basis of Presentation

As used herein, the terms "We," "Company" and "Chemed" refer to Chemed Corporation or Chemed Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Chemed in accordance with Rule 10-01 of SEC Regulation S-X. Consequently, we have omitted certain disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The December 31, 2016 balance sheet data were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP. However, in our opinion, the financial statements presented herein contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. These financial statements are prepared on the same basis as and should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

EARNINGS PER SHARE

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-09 - Compensation – Stock Compensation” which is part of the FASB’s Simplification Initiative. The object of this initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of GAAP. The areas of simplification in this initiative involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. We adopted the applicable provisions of ASU 2016-09 on a prospective basis. The impact of this ASU on our financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was to decrease our income tax expense by $3.7 million as the result of excess tax benefits on stock based compensation being recorded on the statements of income. The decrease in income tax expense reduced our effective tax rate to 30.5% in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to 38.9% in the first quarter of 2016. This, combined with the required change in diluted share count, resulted in an increase to basic earnings per share by $0.23 and an increase to diluted earnings per share by $0.22.

  1. Revenue Recognition

Both the VITAS segment and the Roto-Rooter segment recognize service revenues and sales when the earnings process has been completed. Generally, this occurs when services are provided or products are shipped. VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated realizable amount due from third-party payers. Medicare payments are subject to certain limitations, as described below.

We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admission, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether they are likely to exceed the annual per-beneficiary Medicare cap (“Medicare cap”). Should we determine that revenues for a program are likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective action to influence the patient mix or to increase patient admissions. However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate the amount of revenue recognized during the period that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record the amount as a reduction to patient revenue.

In 2013, the U.S. government implemented automatic budget reductions of 2.0% for all government payees, including hospice benefits paid under the Medicare program. In 2015, CMS determined that the Medicare cap should be calculated “as if” sequestration did not occur. As a result of this decision, VITAS has received notification from our third party intermediary that an additional $2.1 million is owed for Medicare cap in three programs arising during the 2013, 2014 and 2015 measurement periods. The amounts were automatically deducted from our semi-monthly PIP payments. We do not believe that CMS is authorized under the sequestration authority or the statutory methodology for establishing the Medicare cap to demand the $2.1 million under their “as if” methodology. We have not recorded a reserve as of March 31, 2017 for $1.9 million of the potential exposure. We have appealed CMS’s methodology change with the appropriate regulatory appeal board.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, no Medicare cap was recorded.

-6-

Shown below is the Medicare cap liability activity for the fiscal periods ended (in thousands):

March 31, — 2017 2016
Beginning balance January 1, $ 235 $ 1,165
Payments - (618 )
Ending balance March 31, $ 235 $ 547

Vitas provides charity care, in certain circumstances, to patients without charge when management of the hospice program determines, at the time services are performed, that the patient cannot afford payment. There is no revenue or associated accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to charity care. The cost of charity care is calculated by taking the ratio of charity care days to total days of care and multiplying by total cost of care. The cost of charity care is as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,
2017 2016
$ 1,937 $ 1,806
  1. Segments

Service revenues and sales and after-tax earnings by business segment are as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31, — 2017 2016
Service Revenues and Sales
VITAS $ 282,316 $ 277,528
Roto-Rooter 123,548 112,861
Total $ 405,864 $ 390,389
After-tax Earnings
VITAS $ 20,597 $ 19,087
Roto-Rooter 14,624 13,020
Total 35,221 32,107
Corporate (5,377 ) (7,267 )
Net income $ 29,844 $ 24,840

We report corporate administrative expenses and unallocated investing and financing income and expense not directly related to either segment as “Corporate”.

-7-

  1. Earnings per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed using the weighted average number of shares of capital stock outstanding. Earnings and diluted earnings per share are computed as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

For the Three Months Ended March 31, Net Income — Income Shares Earnings per Share
2017
Earnings $ 29,844 16,219 $ 1.84
Dilutive stock options - 490
Nonvested stock awards - 92
Diluted earnings $ 29,844 16,801 $ 1.78
2016
Earnings $ 24,840 16,720 $ 1.49
Dilutive stock options - 305
Nonvested stock awards - 145
Diluted earnings $ 24,840 17,170 $ 1.45

For the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, 402,000 and 421,000 stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they would have been anti-dilutive.

  1. Long-Term Debt

On June 30, 2014, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“2014 Credit Agreement”). Terms of the 2014 Credit Agreement consist of a five-year, $350 million revolving credit facility and a $100 million term loan. The 2014 Credit Agreement has a floating interest rate that is generally LIBOR plus a tiered additional rate which varies based on our current leverage ratio. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 113 basis points as of March 31, 2017.

The debt outstanding as of March 31, 2017 consists of the following:

Revolver $
Term loan 81,875
Total 146,875
Current portion of long-term debt (9,375 )
Long-term debt $ 137,500

Scheduled principal payments of the term loan are as follows:

2017 6,875
2018 10,000
2019 65,000
$ 81,875

The 2014 Credit Agreement contains the following quarterly financial covenants:

Description Requirement
Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated Adj. EBITDA) < 3.50 to 1.00
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash Flow/Consolidated Fixed Charges) > 1.50 to 1.00
Annual Operating Lease Commitment < $50.0 million

-8-

We are in compliance with all debt covenants as of March 31, 2017. We have issued $38.7 million in standby letters of credit as of March 31, 2017 mainly for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the 2014 Credit Agreement. As of March 31, 2017, we have approximately $246.3 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility.

  1. Other Operating Expenses

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recorded $873,000 in expenses related to the closure of three Alabama programs at Vitas. The expenses mainly include employee severance and the write-off of leasehold improvements for one in-patient unit.

  1. Other Income/(Expense) – Net

Other income/(expense) -- net comprises the following (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31, — 2017 2016
Market value adjustment on assets held in
deferred compensation trust $ 2,615 $ (2,987 )
Loss on disposal of property and equipment (236 ) (33 )
Interest income 85 97
Other - net (1 ) (1 )
Total other income/(expense) - net $ 2,463 $ (2,924 )
  1. Stock-Based Compensation Plans

On February 17, 2017, the Compensation/Incentive Committee of the Board of Directors (“CIC”) granted 7,304 Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) contingent upon the achievement of certain total shareholders return (“TSR”) targets as compared to the TSR of a group of peer companies for the three-year period ending December 31, 2019, the date at which such awards vest. The cumulative compensation cost of the TSR-based PSU award to be recorded over the three year service period is $1.7 million.

On February 17, 2017, the CIC also granted 7,304 PSUs contingent upon the achievement of certain earnings per share (“EPS”) targets for the three-year period ending December 31, 2019. At the end of each reporting period, the Company estimates the number of shares that it believes will ultimately be earned and records that expense over the service period of the award. We currently estimate the cumulative compensation cost of the EPS-based PSUs to be recorded over the three year service period is $1.3 million.

  1. Independent Contractor Operations

The Roto-Rooter segment sublicenses with 69 independent contractors to operate certain plumbing repair, excavation, water restoration and drain cleaning businesses in lesser-populated areas of the United States and Canada. We had notes receivable from our independent contractors as of March 31, 2017 totaling $1.5 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.7 million). In most cases these loans are fully or partially secured by equipment owned by the contractor. The interest rates on the loans range from 0% to 7% per annum and the remaining terms of the loans range from 2.5 months to 5.4 years at March 31, 2017. We recorded the following from our independent contractors (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31, — 2017 2016
Revenues $ 11,025 $ 9,858
Pretax profits 6,689 6,155

-9-

  1. Retirement Plans

All of the Company’s plans that provide retirement and similar benefits are defined contribution plans. These expenses include the impact of market gains and losses on assets held in deferred compensation plans. Expenses for the Company’s retirement and profit-sharing plans, excess benefit plans and other similar plans are as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,
2017 2016
$ 6,157 $ 526
  1. Legal and Regulatory Matters

The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry. As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions. The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware. It is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or reasonably estimable.

Regulatory Matters and Litigation

On May 2, 2013, the government filed a False Claims Act complaint against the Company and certain of its hospice-related subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al. , No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”). Prior to that date, the Company received various qui tam lawsuits and subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed. The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002, VITAS, and since 2004, the Company, submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course. This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costs of the action, plus interest. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013. On September 30, 2014, the Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002. On November 13, 2014, the government filed a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint changed and supplemented some of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of action or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS. VITAS filed its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint on August 11, 2015. This case is in the discovery phase. The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss at this time. For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings. The net costs incurred related to U.S. v. Vitas and related regulatory matters were $2.2 million and $2.3 million for March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company and certain current and former directors and officers are defendants in a case captioned In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder and Derivative Litigation , No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.), which was consolidated on February 2, 2015 and is covered by the Company’s commercial insurance.

On February 2, 2015, the Court appointed KBC Asset Management NV the sole lead plaintiff and its counsel, the sole lead and liaison counsel. On March 3, 2015, Lead Plaintiff KBC designated its Complaint as the operative complaint in the consolidated proceedings and defendants renewed a previously filed motion to dismiss those claims and allegations. The consolidated Complaint named fourteen individual defendants, together with the Company as nominal defendant. The Complaint alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants for allegedly permitting the Company to submit false claims to the U.S. government. The Complaint seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees. On May 12, 2016, the court issued a Memorandum Order granting Chemed’s motion to dismiss, and dismissing Lead Plaintiff KBC’s Complaint without prejudice to KBC’s opportunity to file within 30 days of the date of the court’s Order (June 13, 2016) an amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies in its duty of loyalty claim. Lead Plaintiff KBC did not file an amended Complaint within the time specified by the court.

-10-

However, on June 13, 2016, counsel for Chemed shareholder Michael Kvint filed a letter with the court requesting a two-week extension to file a motion to substitute Mr. Kvint as Lead Plaintiff, in place of Lead Plaintiff KBC and to file an amended Complaint. Alternatively, counsel for Mr. Kvint requested that any dismissal of the action be with prejudice to KBC only. On June 14, 2016, Chemed filed a reply letter with the court, reserving its rights to oppose any motion filed by Mr. Kvint and, if warranted, to oppose any other actions taken by Mr. Kvint to proceed with the action (including by filing an untimely amended Complaint). On June 21, 2016, the court entered an Oral Order providing Mr. Kvint until June 30, 2016 to file a Motion to Substitute and Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. On that date, Mr. Kvint filed, under seal, a Motion to Substitute Plaintiff and File Amended Complaint, and attached a Proposed Amended Complaint. Mr. Kvint’s motion was fully briefed by the parties. The Court heard oral argument on Mr. Kvint’s motion on January 24, 2017. On January 25, 2017, Magistrate Judge Burke entered an Order requesting additional letter briefing on issues arising from Mr. Kvint’s motion. Pursuant to that Order, the parties have each submitted opening and reply letter briefing. Magistrate Judge Burke has not yet issued a recommendation or report on Mr. Kvint’s motion. For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.

Jordan Seper, (“Seper”) a Registered Nurse at VITAS' Inland Empire program from May 12, 2014 to March 21, 2015, filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court on September 26, 2016. She alleged VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA (“VITAS CA”) (1) failed to provide minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failed to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failed to provide a second meal period; (4) failed to provide rest breaks; (5) failed to indemnify for necessary expenditures; (6) failed to timely pay wages due at time of separation; and (7) engaged in unfair business practices. Seper seeks a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. She seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs. Seper served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jordan A. Seper on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA, a business entity unknown; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number BC 642857 on October 13, 2016.

On November 14, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation to transfer the venue of the lawsuit from San Francisco to Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Superior Court accepted transfer of the case on December 6, 2016. On December 16, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Seper.

Jiwan Chhina ("Chhina"), hired by VITAS as a Home Health Aide on February 5, 2002, is currently a Licensed Vocational Nurse for VITAS' San Diego program. On September 27, 2016, Chhina filed a lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court, alleging (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failure to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failure to pay wages for all hours at the regular rate; (4) failure to provide meal periods; (5) failure to provide rest breaks; (6) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; (7) failure to pay for all reimbursement expenses; (8) unfair business practices; and (9) violation of the California Private Attorneys General Act. Chhina seeks to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. He seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs. Chhina served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jiwann Chhina v. VITAS Health Services of California, Inc., a California corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare, Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego Superior Court Case Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL on November 3, 2016. On December 1, 2016, VITAS filed its Answer and served written discovery on Chhina.

The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss for either of these lawsuits at this time.

The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits. Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, responding to the subpoenas and dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity. Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

  1. Concentration of Risk

During the quarter VITAS had pharmacy services agreements with one service provider to provide specified pharmacy services for VITAS and its hospice patients. VITAS made purchases from this provider of $8.9 million for the first quarter of 2017. Vitas made purchases from two providers of $8.9 million for the first quarter of 2016. Purchases from these providers were approximately 90% of all pharmacy services used by VITAS during each quarter presented.

-11-

  1. Cash Overdrafts and Cash Equivalents

There are no cash overdrafts payable included in accounts payable at March 31, 2017 (December 31, 2016 - $8.6 million).

From time to time throughout the year, we invest excess cash in money market funds with major commercial banks. We closely monitor the creditworthiness of the institutions with which we invest our overnight funds. We had $30,000 in cash equivalents as of March 31, 2017. There was $72,000 in cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016.

  1. Financial Instruments

FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements defines a hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs in fair value measurements. Level 1 measurements are measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 measurements use significant other observable inputs. Level 3 measurements are measurements using significant unobservable inputs which require a company to develop its own assumptions. In recording the fair value of assets and liabilities, companies must use the most reliable measurement available. For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and short-term nature of these instruments.

The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of March 31, 2017 (in thousands):

Carrying Value Fair Value Measure — Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual fund investments of deferred
compensation plans held in trust $ 56,596 $ 56,596 $ - $ -
Long-term debt 146,875 - 146,875 -

The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

Carrying Value Fair Value Measure — Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual fund investments of deferred
compensation plans held in trust $ 54,389 $ 54,389 $ - $ -
Long-term debt 108,750 - 108,750 -

For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and short-term nature of these instruments. As further described in Footnote 5, our outstanding long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt have floating interest rates that are reset at short-term intervals, generally 30 or 60 days. The interest rate we pay also includes an additional amount based on our current leverage ratio. As such, we believe our borrowings reflect significant nonperformance risks, mainly credit risk. Based on these factors, we believe the fair value of our long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt approximate the carrying value.

-12-

  1. Capital Stock Repurchase Plan Transactions

We repurchased the following capital stock for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

Three months ended March 31, — 2017 2016
Total cost of repurchased shares (in thousands): $ 54,262 $ 52,460
Shares repurchased 300,000 400,000
Weighted average price per share $ 180.87 $ 131.15

In March 2017, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $100.0 million for stock repurchase under Chemed’s existing share repurchase program. We currently have $ 95.9 m illion of au thorization remaining under this share repurchase plan.

  1. Recent Accounting Statements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which provides additional guidance to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue. The standard and subsequent amendments are intended to develop a common revenue standard for removing inconsistencies and weaknesses, improve comparability, provide more useful information to users through improved disclosure requirements, and simplify the preparation of financial statements. This guidance and subsequent amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We are in the process of analyzing various contractual arrangements with customers at each subsidiary. We believe that it is likely, as a result of adopting the ASU that certain expenses currently included in bad debt expense will be shown as contractual allowances (i.e. net revenue). We currently do not have an estimate of the magnitude of this potential impact. We anticipate a modified retrospective adoption of the ASU.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-02 – Leases” which introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on to the balance sheets and updates lessor accounting to align with changes in the lessee model and the revenue recognition standard. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on our financial statements, existing lease recognition policies and disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-15 – Cash Flow Classification” which amends guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The primary purpose of ASU 2016-15 is to reduce diversity in practice related to eight specific cash flow issues. The guidance in this ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We have analyzed the impact of ASU 2016-15 on our statement of cash flows and do not expect it to have a material effect.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2017-4 – Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the FASB eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The guidance in the ASU is effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We anticipate adoption of this standard will have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

  1. Goodwill

Shown below is movement in Goodwill (in thousands):

Vitas Roto-Rooter Total
Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 328,301 $ 144,065 $ 472,366
Foreign currency adjustments - 25 25
Balance at March 31, 2017 $ 328,301 $ 144,090 $ 472,391

-13-

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Summary

We operate through our two wholly-owned subsidiaries, VITAS Healthcare Corporation and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients’ final days as comfortable as possible. Through its teams of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families. Roto-Rooter’s services are focused on providing plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to both residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90% of the U.S. population.

The following is a summary of the key operating results (in thousands except per share amounts):

Three months ended March 31, — 2017 2016
Service revenues and sales $ 405,864 $ 390,389
Net income $ 29,844 $ 24,840
Diluted EPS $ 1.78 $ 1.45
Adjusted net income $ 30,495 $ 27,754
Adjusted diluted EPS $ 1.82 $ 1.62
Adjusted EBITDA $ 59,818 $ 54,480
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue 14.7 % 14.0 %

Adjusted net income, adjusted diluted EPS, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures derived in accordance with GAAP. We provide non-GAAP measures to help readers evaluate our operating results and to compare our operating performance with that of similar companies that have different capital structures. Our non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable measures presented in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures is presented on pages 22-23.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the increase in consolidated service revenues and sales was driven by a 9.5% increase at Roto-Rooter and a 1.7% increase at VITAS. The increase in service revenues at Roto-Rooter was driven by an increase in all major service lines. The increase in service revenues at VITAS was primarily a result of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing 1.6%, a 3.6% increase in average daily census, offset by acuity mix shift which negatively impacted revenue 2.4% and the 1.1% negative impact from having one less day in the quarter when compared to the prior year period. Consolidated net income increased 20.1% mainly due to increased revenue and gross profit margin at both VITAS and Roto-Rooter combined with a lower effective tax rate as a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. Diluted EPS increased 22.8% as a result of the increase in net income as well as a lower number of shares outstanding. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue increased 70 basis points when compared to the prior year quarter mainly as a result of the increase in net income. See page 24 for additional VITAS operating metrics.

VITAS expects its full-year 2017 revenue growth, prior to Medicare cap, to be in the range of 4.0% to 5.0%. Admissions and Average Daily Census in 2017 is estimated to expand approximately 3.0% to 4.0%. Adjusted EBITDA margin, prior to Medicare cap, is estimated to be 14.5% to 15.0%. This guidance includes $3.75 million for Medicare cap billing limitations. Roto-Rooter expects full-year 2017 revenue growth of 3.0% to 4.0%. The revenue estimate is a based upon increased job pricing of approximately 2.0% and continued growth in water restoration services. Adjusted EBITDA margin for 2017 is estimated in the range of 21.5% to 22.0%. We anticipate that our operating income and cash flows will be sufficient to operate our businesses and meet any commitments for the foreseeable future.

-14-

Financial Condition

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Material changes in the balance sheet accounts from December 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017 include the following:

• A $22.3 million decrease in accounts receivable due mainly to timing of Medicare and Medicaid payments.

• We received a $41.7 million Medicare payment on March 31, 2017.

• A $10.2 million decrease in accounts payable due to timing of payments.

• A $12.6 million increase in income taxes payable due to timing of payments.

• A $6.2 million increase in accrued insurance primarily due to the change in stop loss receivable for the quarter.

• A $16.6 million decrease in accrued compensation due to the payments of cash bonuses accrued in 2016.

• A $38.1 million increase in long-term debt due to borrowings on our revolving line of credit mainly to fund stock repurchases.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $61.6 million mainly as a result of a decrease in accounts receivable (causing an increase in cash) due to the timing of payments. We received a $41.7 million Medicare payment on March 31, 2017. Significant changes in our accounts receivable balances are typically driven mainly by the timing of payments received from the Federal government at our VITAS subsidiary. We typically receive a payment in excess of $40.0 million from the Federal government from hospice services every other Friday. The timing of period end will have a significant impact on the accounts receivable at VITAS. These changes generally normalize over a two year period, as cash flow variations in one year are offset in the following year.

Management continually evaluates cash utilization alternatives, including share repurchase, debt repurchase, acquisitions and increased dividends to determine the most beneficial use of available capital resources.

We have issued $38.7 million in standby letters of credit as of March 31, 2017, mainly for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the revolving credit agreement. As of March 31, 2017, we have approximately $246.3 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility. Management believes its liquidity and sources of capital are satisfactory for the Company’s needs in the foreseeable future.

Commitments and Contingencies

Collectively, the terms of our credit agreements require us to meet various financial covenants, to be tested quarterly. We are in compliance with all financial and other debt covenants as of March 31, 2017 and anticipate remaining in compliance throughout the foreseeable future.

The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry. As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions. The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware. It is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or reasonably estimable.

On May 2, 2013, the government filed a False Claims Act complaint against the Company and certain of its hospice-related subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al. , No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”). Prior to that date, the Company received various qui tam lawsuits and subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed. The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002, VITAS, and since 2004, the Company, submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course. This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costs of the action, plus interest. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013. On September 30, 2014, the Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002. On November 13, 2014, the government filed a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint changed and supplemented some of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of action or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS. VITAS filed its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint on August 11, 2015. This case is in the discovery phase. The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss at this time. For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings. The net costs incurred related to U.S. v. Vitas and related regulatory matters were $2.2 million and $2.3 million for March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company and certain current and former directors and officers are defendants in a case captioned In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder and Derivative Litigation , No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.), which was consolidated on February 2, 2015 and is covered by the Company’s commercial insurance.

-15-

On February 2, 2015, the Court appointed KBC Asset Management NV the sole lead plaintiff and its counsel, the sole lead and liaison counsel. On March 3, 2015, Lead Plaintiff KBC designated its Complaint as the operative complaint in the consolidated proceedings and defendants renewed a previously filed motion to dismiss those claims and allegations. The consolidated Complaint named fourteen individual defendants, together with the Company as nominal defendant. The Complaint alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants for allegedly permitting the Company to submit false claims to the U.S. government. The Complaint seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees. On May 12, 2016, the court issued a Memorandum Order granting Chemed’s motion to dismiss, and dismissing Lead Plaintiff KBC’s Complaint without prejudice to KBC’s opportunity to file within 30 days of the date of the court’s Order (June 13, 2016) an amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies in its duty of loyalty claim. Lead Plaintiff KBC did not file an amended Complaint within the time specified by the court.

However, on June 13, 2016, counsel for Chemed shareholder Michael Kvint filed a letter with the court requesting a two-week extension to file a motion to substitute Mr. Kvint as Lead Plaintiff, in place of Lead Plaintiff KBC and to file an amended Complaint. Alternatively, counsel for Mr. Kvint requested that any dismissal of the action be with prejudice to KBC only. On June 14, 2016, Chemed filed a reply letter with the court, reserving its rights to oppose any motion filed by Mr. Kvint and, if warranted, to oppose any other actions taken by Mr. Kvint to proceed with the action (including by filing an untimely amended Complaint). On June 21, 2016, the court entered an Oral Order providing Mr. Kvint until June 30, 2016 to file a Motion to Substitute and Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. On that date, Mr. Kvint filed, under seal, a Motion to Substitute Plaintiff and File Amended Complaint, and attached a Proposed Amended Complaint. Mr. Kvint’s motion was fully briefed by the parties. The Court heard oral argument on Mr. Kvint’s motion on January 24, 2017. On January 25, 2017, Magistrate Judge Burke entered an Order requesting additional letter briefing on issues arising from Mr. Kvint’s motion. Pursuant to that Order, the parties have each submitted opening and reply letter briefing. Magistrate Judge Burke has not yet issued a recommendation or report on Mr. Kvint’s motion. For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.

Jordan Seper, (“Seper”) a Registered Nurse at VITAS' Inland Empire program from May 12, 2014 to March 21, 2015, filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court on September 26, 2016. She alleged VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA (“VITAS CA”) (1) failed to provide minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failed to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failed to provide a second meal period; (4) failed to provide rest breaks; (5) failed to indemnify for necessary expenditures; (6) failed to timely pay wages due at time of separation; and (7) engaged in unfair business practices. Seper seeks a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. She seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs. Seper served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jordan A. Seper on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA, a business entity unknown; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number BC 642857 on October 13, 2016.

On November 14, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation to transfer the venue of the lawsuit from San Francisco to Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Superior Court accepted transfer of the case on December 6, 2016. On December 16, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Seper.

Jiwan Chhina ("Chhina"), hired by VITAS as a Home Health Aide on February 5, 2002, is currently a Licensed Vocational Nurse for VITAS' San Diego program. On September 27, 2016, Chhina filed a lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court, alleging (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failure to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failure to pay wages for all hours at the regular rate; (4) failure to provide meal periods; (5) failure to provide rest breaks; (6) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; (7) failure to pay for all reimbursement expenses; (8) unfair business practices; and (9) violation of the California Private Attorneys General Act. Chhina seeks to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. He seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs. Chhina served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jiwann Chhina v. VITAS Health Services of California, Inc., a California corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare, Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego Superior Court Case Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL on November 3, 2016. On December 1, 2016, VITAS filed its Answer and served written discovery on Chhina.

-16-

The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss for either of these lawsuits at this time.

The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits. Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, responding to the subpoenas and dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity. Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Results of Operations

Three months ended March 31, 2017 versus 2016 - Consolidated Results

Our service revenues and sales for the first quarter of 2017 increased 4.0% versus services and sales revenues for the first quarter of 2016. Of this increase, a $4.8 million increase was attributable to VITAS and $10.7 million increase was attributable to Roto-Rooter. The following chart shows the components of those changes (in thousands):

Increase/(Decrease) — Amount Percent
VITAS
Routine homecare $ 10,686 5.0
Continuous care (4,304 ) (11.6 )
General inpatient (1,594 ) (6.2 )
Roto-Rooter
Plumbing 3,122 6.4
Drain cleaning 412 1.1
Water restoration 5,625 45.1
Contractor operations 1,167 11.8
Other 361 6.9
Total $ 15,475 4.0

The increase in VITAS’ revenues for the first quarter of 2017 versus the first quarter of 2016 was comprised of an average net Medicare reimbursement rate increasing approximately 1.6%, a 2.5% increase in days of care offset by acuity mix shift which negatively impacted revenue 2.4% as well as the 1.1% negative impact from having one less day in the quarter when compared to the prior year period.

Days of care during the quarter ended March 31 were as follows:

2017 2016 Percent
Routine homecare 1,380,548 1,335,617 3.4
Continuous care 45,417 50,970 (10.9 )
General inpatient 33,985 38,249 (11.1 )
Total days of care 1,459,950 1,424,836 2.5

Over 90% of VITAS’ service revenues for the period were from Medicare and Medicaid.

The increase in plumbing revenues for the first quarter of 2017 versus 2016 is attributable to an 8.3% increase in price and service mix shift offset by a 1.9% decrease in job count. Drain cleaning revenues for the first quarter of 2017 versus 2016 reflect a 6.1% increase in price and service mix shift offset by a 5.0% decrease in job count. Water restoration for the first quarter of 2017 versus 2016 increased 45.1% as a result of continued expansion of this service offering in all Roto-Rooter locations. Contractor operations increased 11.8% mainly due to their expansion into water restoration and other Roto-Rooter revenue increased 6.9%.

-17-

The consolidated gross margin was 29.7% in the first quarter of 2017 as compared with 28.7% in the first quarter of 2016. On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 21.5% in the first quarter of 2017 as compared with 21.0%, in the first quarter of 2016. The Roto-Rooter segment’s gross margin was 48.6% for the first quarter of 2017 compared with 47.6% in the first quarter of 2016.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) comprise (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31, — 2017 2016
SG&A expenses before market value adjustments of deferred compensation
plans, long-term incentive compensation, and OIG investigation expenses $ 63,732 $ 59,937
Long-term incentive compensation 961 (241 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation 2,150 2,336
Impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred
compensation trusts 2,615 (2,987 )
Total SG&A expenses $ 69,458 $ 59,045

SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation, expenses related to OIG investigation and the impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred compensation trusts for the first quarter of 2017 were up 6.3% when compared to the first quarter of 2016. This increase was mainly a result of the increase in variable expenses caused by increased revenue as well as normal salary increases in 2017.

Other operating expenses increased $873,000 in the first quarter of 2017 related to the closure of the programs in one state at Vitas. The expenses mainly include employee severance and the write-off of leasehold improvements for one in-patient unit. There were no other operating expenses in the first quarter of 2016.

Other income/(expense) - net comprise (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31, — 2017 2016
Market value adjustment on assets held in
deferred compensation trusts $ 2,615 $ (2,987 )
Loss on disposal of property and equipment (236 ) (33 )
Interest income 85 97
Other (1 ) (1 )
Total other income/(expense) - net $ 2,463 $ (2,924 )

Our effective income tax rate was 30.5% in the first quarter of 2017 compared to 38.9% during the first quarter of 2016. The change in the effective income tax rate is a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 – Compensation – Stock Compensation which requires that the excess tax benefits from stock based compensation now be recorded in the income tax provision on the statements of income.

-18-

Net income for both periods included the following after-tax items/adjustments that (reduced) or increased after-tax earnings (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31, — 2017 2016
VITAS
Expenses related to OIG investigation $ (1,328 ) $ (1,443 )
Program closure expenses (513 ) -
Corporate
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation 3,695 -
Stock option expense (1,897 ) (1,621 )
Long-term incentive compensation (608 ) 152
Expenses related to securities litigation - (2 )
Total $ (651 ) $ (2,914 )

Three months ended March 31, 2017 versus 2016 - Segment Results

The change in after-tax earnings for the first quarter of 2017 versus the first quarter of 2016 is due to (in thousands):

Increase/(Decrease) — Amount Percent
VITAS $ 1,510 7.9
Roto-Rooter 1,604 12.3
Corporate 1,890 26.0
$ 5,004 20.1

VITAS’ after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2017 compared to 2016 by a $4.8 million increase in revenue, offset by a $2.4 million increase in cost of services provided and goods sold. After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue in the first quarter of 2017 were 7.3%, an increase of 0.4% over the first quarter of 2016.

Roto-Rooter’s after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily by a $5.6 million revenue increase in Roto-Rooter’s water restoration line of business, a $3.1 million increase in plumbing revenue and a $2.0 million increase in all other revenue types. After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in 2017 were 11.8% as compared to 11.5% in 2016.

The improvement at Corporate is due mainly to the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 which positively impacted the Company’s tax provision by approximately $3.7 million.

-19-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017
(in thousands)(unaudited)
Chemed
VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated
2017 (a)
Service revenues and sales $ 282,316 $ 123,548 $ - $ 405,864
Cost of services provided and goods sold 221,678 63,462 - 285,140
Selling, general and administrative expenses 24,294 33,460 11,704 69,458
Depreciation 4,778 3,984 131 8,893
Amortization 14 32 - 46
Other operating expenses 873 - - 873
Total costs and expenses 251,637 100,938 11,835 364,410
Income/(loss) from operations 30,679 22,610 (11,835 ) 41,454
Interest expense (55 ) (99 ) (841 ) (995 )
Intercompany interest income/(expense) 2,702 1,310 (4,012 ) -
Other income/(expense)—net (80 ) (72 ) 2,615 2,463
Income/(expense) before income taxes 33,246 23,749 (14,073 ) 42,922
Income taxes (12,649 ) (9,125 ) 8,696 (13,078 )
Net income/(loss) $ 20,597 $ 14,624 $ (5,377 ) $ 29,844
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):
Chemed
VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated
Pretax benefit/(cost):
Stock option expense $ - $ - $ (3,001 ) $ (3,001 )
Long-term incentive compensation - - (961 ) (961 )
Program closure expenses (873 ) - - (873 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation (2,150 ) - - (2,150 )
Total $ (3,023 ) $ - $ (3,962 ) $ (6,985 )
Chemed
VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated
After-tax benefit/(cost):
Stock option expense $ - $ - $ (1,897 ) $ (1,897 )
Long-term incentive compensation - - (608 ) (608 )
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation - - 3,695 3,695
Program closure expenses (513 ) - - (513 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation (1,328 ) - - (1,328 )
Total $ (1,841 ) $ - $ 1,190 $ (651 )

-20-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016
(in thousands)(unaudited)
Chemed
VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated
2016 (a)
Service revenues and sales $ 277,528 $ 112,861 $ - $ 390,389
Cost of services provided and goods sold 219,266 59,169 - 278,435
Selling, general and administrative expenses 24,783 29,807 4,455 59,045
Depreciation 4,781 3,501 142 8,424
Amortization 14 78 - 92
Total costs and expenses 248,844 92,555 4,597 345,996
Income/(loss) from operations 28,684 20,306 (4,597 ) 44,393
Interest expense (59 ) (93 ) (690 ) (842 )
Intercompany interest income/(expense) 2,103 948 (3,051 ) -
Other income/(expense)—net 41 23 (2,988 ) (2,924 )
Income/(expense) before income taxes 30,769 21,184 (11,326 ) 40,627
Income taxes (11,682 ) (8,164 ) 4,059 (15,787 )
Net income/(loss) $ 19,087 $ 13,020 $ (7,267 ) $ 24,840
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):
Chemed
VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated
Pretax benefit/(cost):
Stock option expense $ - $ - $ (2,563 ) $ (2,563 )
Long-term incentive compensation - - 241 241
Expenses related to securities litigation - - (3 ) (3 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation (2,336 ) - - (2,336 )
Total $ (2,336 ) $ - $ (2,325 ) $ (4,661 )
Chemed
VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated
After-tax benefit/(cost):
Stock option expense $ - $ - $ (1,621 ) $ (1,621 )
Long-term incentive compensation - - 152 152
Expenses related to securities litigation - - (2 ) (2 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation (1,443 ) - - (1,443 )
Total $ (1,443 ) $ - $ (1,471 ) $ (2,914 )

-21-

Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
(in thousands) Chemed
For the three months ended March 31, 2017 VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated
Net income/(loss) $ 20,597 $ 14,624 $ (5,377 ) $ 29,844
Add/(deduct):
Interest expense 55 99 841 995
Income taxes 12,649 9,125 (8,696 ) 13,078
Depreciation 4,778 3,984 131 8,893
Amortization 14 32 - 46
EBITDA 38,093 27,864 (13,101 ) 52,856
Add/(deduct):
Intercompany interest expense/(income) (2,702 ) (1,310 ) 4,012 -
Interest income (70 ) (15 ) - (85 )
Program closure expenses 873 - - 873
Expenses related to OIG investigation 2,150 - - 2,150
Amortization of stock awards 78 70 188 336
Advertising cost adjustment - (274 ) - (274 )
Stock option expense - - 3,001 3,001
Long-term incentive compensation - - 961 961
Adjusted EBITDA $ 38,422 $ 26,335 $ (4,939 ) $ 59,818
Chemed
For the three months ended March 31, 2016 VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated
Net income/(loss) $ 19,087 $ 13,020 $ (7,267 ) $ 24,840
Add/(deduct):
Interest expense 59 93 690 842
Income taxes 11,682 8,164 (4,059 ) 15,787
Depreciation 4,781 3,501 142 8,424
Amortization 14 78 - 92
EBITDA 35,623 24,856 (10,494 ) 49,985
Add/(deduct):
Intercompany interest expense/(income) (2,103 ) (948 ) 3,051 -
Interest income (79 ) (17 ) (1 ) (97 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation 2,336 - - 2,336
Amortization of stock awards 131 81 327 539
Expenses related to securities litigation - - 3 3
Advertising cost adjustment - (608 ) - (608 )
Stock option expense - - 2,563 2,563
Long-term incentive compensation - - (241 ) (241 )
Adjusted EBITDA $ 35,908 $ 23,364 $ (4,792 ) $ 54,480

-22-

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016
Net income as reported $ 29,844 $ 24,840
Add/(deduct) after-tax cost of:
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation (3,695 ) -
Stock option expense 1,897 1,621
Expenses of OIG investigation 1,328 1,443
Long-term incentive compensation 608 (152 )
Program closure expenses 513 -
Expenses related to securities settlements - 2
Adjusted net income $ 30,495 $ 27,754
Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported
Net income $ 1.78 $ 1.45
Average number of shares outstanding 16,801 17,170
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share
Adjusted net income $ 1.82 $ 1.62
Adjusted average number of shares outstanding 16,801 17,170

-23-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
OPERATING STATISTICS 2017 2016
Net revenue ($000)
Homecare $ 225,536 $ 214,850
Inpatient 23,923 25,517
Continuous care 32,857 37,161
Total $ 282,316 $ 277,528
Net revenue as a percent of total before Medicare cap allowances
Homecare 79.9 % 77.4 %
Inpatient 8.5 9.2
Continuous care 11.6 13.4
Total 100.0 % 100.0 %
Average daily census (days)
Homecare 12,287 11,681
Nursing home 3,052 2,991
Routine homecare 15,339 14,672
Inpatient 378 421
Continuous care 505 560
Total 16,222 15,653
Total Admissions 17,563 16,868
Total Discharges 17,213 16,743
Average length of stay (days) 88.7 83.7
Median length of stay (days) 15.0 15.0
ADC by major diagnosis
Cerebro 19.7 % 22.1 %
Neurological 34.4 31.2
Cancer 15.1 15.3
Cardio 16.6 17.3
Respiratory 7.9 7.9
Other 6.3 6.2
Total 100.0 % 100.0 %
Admissions by major diagnosis
Cerebro 10.9 11.3 %
Neurological 22.1 20.9
Cancer 29.5 30.5
Cardio 15.1 15.5
Respiratory 11.7 10.9
Other 10.7 10.9
Total 100.0 % 100.0 %
Direct patient care margins
Routine homecare 51.3 % 52.1 %
Inpatient 5.9 5.7
Continuous care 15.6 15.1
Homecare margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
Labor costs $ 58.64 $ 56.72
Combined drug, HME and medical supplies 15.14 15.46
Inpatient margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
Labor costs $ 369.99 $ 338.73
Continuous care margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
Labor costs $ 590.73 $ 599.38
Bad debt expense as a percent of revenues 1.2 % 1.3 %
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied Medicare payments 35.9 38.3
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied Medicare payments 24.9 36.8

-24-

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe”, “expect”, “hope”, “anticipate”, “plan” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve various known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, which could cause Chemed’s actual results to differ from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Variances in any or all of the risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors from our assumptions could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and trends. In addition, our ability to deal with the unknown outcomes of these events, many of which are beyond our control, may affect the reliability of projections and other financial matters. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risk and there are no assurances that the matters contained in such statements will be achieved. Chemed does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of a new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company’s primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk exposure through its variable interest line of credit. At March 31, 2017, the Company had $146.9 million of variable rate debt outstanding. For each $10 million dollars borrowed under the credit facility, an increase or decrease of 100 basis points (1% point), increases or decreases the Company’s annual interest expense by $100,000.

The Company continually evaluates this interest rate exposure and periodically weighs the cost versus the benefit of fixing the variable interest rates through a variety of hedging techniques.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of our President and Chief Executive Officer and with the participation of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the Vice President and Controller, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings, see note 10, Legal and Regulatory Matters, under Part I, Item I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

-25-

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 2(c). Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table shows the activity related to our share repurchase program for the first three months of 2017:

of Shares Weighted Average — Price Paid Per Cumulative Shares — Repurchased Under Dollar Amount — Remaining Under
Repurchased Share the Program The Program
February 2011 Program
January 1 through January 31, 2017 - $ - 7,315,718 $ 50,173,009
February 1 through February 28, 2017 104,358 178.39 7,420,076 31,556,555
March 1 through March 31, 2017 195,642 182.20 7,615,718 $ 95,910,768
First Quarter Total 300,000 $ 180.87

On March 13, 2017 our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million under the February 2011 Repurchase Program.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None

Item 5. Other Information

-26-

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No. Description
31.1 Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2 Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.
31.3 Certification by Arthur V. Tucker, Jr. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.
32.1 Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.3 Certification by Arthur V. Tucker, Jr. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Chemed Corporation
(Registrant)
Dated: April 28, 2017 By: /s/ Kevin J. McNamara
Kevin J. McNamara
(President and Chief Executive Officer)
Dated: April 28, 2017 By: /s/ David P. Williams
David P. Williams
(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)
Dated: April 28, 2017 By: /s/ Michael D. Witzeman
Michael D. Witzeman
(Vice President and Controller)

-27-