AI assistant
CHALICE MINING LIMITED — Interim / Quarterly Report 2014
Jul 29, 2014
64649_rns_2014-07-29_a0ab53fb-2920-4145-bd7b-63a4d7c1a6e9.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [523 x 131] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ABN 47 116 648 956
----- End of picture text -----
ASX Announcement
June 2014 Quarterly Report
Exploration gets underway at the Cameron Gold Project and Chalice acquires Dubenski gold deposit
Highlights:
-
Chalice successfully renegotiates the existing option agreement over the Dubenski gold deposit, located near the Cameron Gold Project, for C$700,000 plus an additional payment for incremental ounces mined above the first 70,000 ounces.
-
Drilling at Cameron intersects good grades over relatively narrow widths at the Juno, Jupiter and Ajax prospects, confirming that mineralised structures with ‘Cameron-style’ alteration and gold mineralisation extend through the targeted areas.
-
Diamond drilling is planned at Cameron to follow up targets generated from further MMI soil geochemistry and geophysical surveys with drilling likely to commence late in the September Quarter.
-
GeoCrystal is scheduled to start RC drilling at the Webb Diamond Project in early August 2014.
-
Chalice’s balance sheet remains strong with cash of A$44M at 30 June 2014.
Overview:
During the June Quarter, Chalice Gold Mines Limited (ASX: CHN, TSX: CXN – “Chalice” or “the Company”) commenced exploration activities at the Cameron Gold Project with drilling undertaken at a number of “drillready” targets within a 5-10km radius of the Cameron deposit such as Juno, Ajax, Hermione and Jupiter. Drilling intersected good grades over narrow widths at Juno, Jupiter and Ajax, confirming that mineralised structures with ‘Cameron-style’ alteration and gold mineralisation extend through the targeted areas.
In parallel, Chalice completed 1,457 line km of Versatile Time Domain Electromagnetic (“VTEM”) and 2,134 line km of aeromagnetic surveys over the western Cameron and West Cedartree tenements to support the identification and prioritisation of further drill targets. Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) soil geochemistry is also currently being trialled to potentially speed up the process of in-filling geochemical data coverage over target areas and help prioritise drill targets.
Shortly after the Quarter closed, Chalice was successful in acquiring the existing Dubenski gold deposit (“Dubenski”) by renegotiating the existing option agreement under favourable terms. The Company also continues to remain active in business development, assessing transactions which would be complementary to the Cameron Gold Camp Project.
==> picture [508 x 19] intentionally omitted <==
Chalice Gold Mines Limited, Level 2, 1292 Hay Street, West Perth, Western Australia T: +618 9322 3960 F: +618 9322 5800 E: [email protected] www.chalicegold.com
1. Dubenski Deposit Acquisition
After the Quarter closed, Chalice successfully negotiated the acquisition of the Dubenski gold deposit in Ontario, Canada for C$700,000 (“the Acquisition”) by renegotiating the existing option agreement with the vendor. For further details of the Dubenski transaction please refer to the ASX release on the 23/07/2014 - Chalice acquires the Dubenski Gold Deposit.
Dubenski contains an Indicated Resource of 806,000 tonnes at 2.28 g/t for 59,000 ounces and an Inferred Resource of 392,000 tonnes at 1.44 g/t for 18,200 ounces (Table 1). Dubenski is located within the West Cedartree Project, which is located less than 10km to the west of the Cameron gold deposit (Figure 1).
The greater Cameron Gold Camp Project has total Measured and Indicated Resources of 10,058,000 tonnes at 2.09 g/t for 675,900 ounces and an Inferred Resource of 7,046,000 tonnes at 2.61 g/t for 591,300 ounces (Table 1).
Securing the Dubenski gold deposit is an important step forward in Chalice’s goal of continuing to grow and enhance the Cameron Gold Project by securing additional high-grade ounces in close proximity to the existing Cameron deposit.
The transaction is conditional upon any approvals and consents that may be necessary under the legal and regulatory regime to which the Dubenski gold deposit is subject and is expected to be completed in the next few weeks.
==> picture [452 x 316] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1 – The Cameron Gold Camp Project and location of the Dubenski Gold Deposit
2
| Deposit | Description | Cut-off **Goldg/t ** |
Class | Tonnes | Gold g/t | Gold Oz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron | Open Cut | 0.5g/t | Measured | 2,872,000 | 2.3 | 212,400 |
| RL>=750m | Indicated | 5,417,000 | 1.76 | 306,600 | ||
| Meas+Indic | 8,289,000 | 1.95 | 519,700 | |||
| Inferred | 881,000 | 2.07 | 58,600 | |||
| Underground | 1.75g/t | Measured | 157,000 | 2.77 | 14,000 | |
| RL<750m | Indicated | 559,000 | 3.23 | 58,100 | ||
| Meas+Indic | 716,000 | 3.13 | 72,100 | |||
| Inferred | 5,709,000 | 2.78 | 510,300 | |||
| Dubenski | Open Cut | 1.00g/t | Measured | |||
| RL>=180m | Indicated | 806,000 | 2.28 | 59,100 | ||
| Meas+Indic | 806,000 | 2.28 | 59,100 | |||
| Inferred | 392,000 | 1.44 | 18,200 | |||
| Dogpaw | Open Cut | 0.5g/t | Measured | |||
| RL>=210m | Indicated | 247,000 | 3.02 | 24,000 | ||
| Meas+Indic | 247,000 | 3.02 | 24,000 | |||
| Inferred | 64,000 | 2.26 | 4,700 | |||
| Total | Measured | 3,029,000 | 2.33 | 226,900 | ||
| Indicated | 7,029,000 | 1.98 | 447,500 | |||
| Meas+Indic | 10,058,000 | 2.09 | 675,900 | |||
| Inferred | 7,046,000 | 2.61 | 591,300 |
Table 1- Cameron Gold Camp Mineral Resource
The information relating to the Mineral Resource estimates reported herein for the Cameron Gold Camp Project, which includes the Dubenski Gold Deposit, is derived from the sections of the Technical Report dated 28 July 2014 prepared for Chalice Gold Mines Limited by Mr. Peter Ball of Datageo Geological Consultants who is a Chartered Professional and Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. Ball has sufficient experience in the field of activity being reported to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves, and is a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 – ‘Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects’. The Qualified Person has verified the data disclosed in this release, including sampling, analytical and test data underlying the information contained in this release. Mr. Ball consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information that is included in this report in relation to Mineral Resource estimates reported herein for the Cameron Gold Camp Project is extracted from the ASX Announcement entitled “Chalice Files Updated 43-101 Technical Report” dated 28 July, 2014 and is available to view on www.chalicegold.com. The company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. The company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
3
2. Cameron Gold Project Exploration
Diamond drilling targeting gold-in-till anomalies at four prospects – Juno, Ajax, Hermione and Jupiter – was undertaken during the Quarter for a total of 2,600m in 15 holes (see Figure 2 below). Narrow but potentially economic grades were intersected at the Juno, Jupiter and Ajax prospects confirming that mineralised structures with ‘Cameron-style’ alteration and gold mineralisation extend through the targeted areas.
While a total of 120,000m of drilling has been completed in the vicinity of the Cameron Gold Project, approximately 115,000m has been within the Cameron deposit itself, leaving prospective areas outside of the Cameron deposit relatively under-explored.
A complete summary of all drill holes is provided in Appendix 2, however, better intersections included:
o Juno: 1m at 3.35g/t Au from 91m 1m at 3.80g/t Au from 138.6m o Jupiter: 0.9m at 2.78g/t Au from 109.85m 1m at 1.95g/t Au from 94m o Ajax: 0.5m at 3.18g/t Au from 14.8m 0.8m at 1.23g/t Au from 24.55m 0.7m at 1.44g/t Au from 32.30m 1.05m at 2.00g/t Au from 64m
==> picture [496 x 298] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2 – Cameron Prospects Drilled during June Quarter
At Juno, the mineralised intersections comprise chlorite-sericite-carbonate-pyrite (0.5%) alteration associated with quartz-carbonate veining. The intersections lie on or adjacent to sheared dolerite/basalt contacts in a similar setting to the Cameron mineralisation.
4
At Ajax, the mineralisation comprises quartz-albite-carbonate-chlorite breccia veins with ~1% vein related pyrite. Alteration extends 30cm into the surrounding dolerite and, as at Cameron, there are a number of porphyry dykes in close proximity.
At the Jupiter prospect several holes intersected strong quartz veining associated with intense sericite-carbonatehematite-magnetite alteration with 0.5-1% pyrite in probable extensions of the dolerite that hosts the Cameron deposit.
Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) soil geochemistry is now being trialled to see whether this technique, which has proven effective elsewhere in the Cameron district, might provide more cost effective and quicker way to track these structures along strike.
Early in the Quarter, the Company completed combined Versatile Time Domain Electromagnetic (“VTEM”) and aeromagnetic surveys over the western Cameron and West Cedartree tenements.
A total of 1,457 line km of VTEM at 200m line spacings and 2,134 line km of magnetics at 100m line spacings were acquired. Processing of the data was undertaken by Southern Geoscience Consultants, who also merged the new data with previously acquired detailed magnetics covering the eastern Cameron block. An interpretation of this combined data set by consultant geophysicist Peter Diorio is expected early in the next Quarter.
More regionally, the Company commissioned consultant Dr Jon Hronsky to conduct a metallogenic framework and mineral targeting study to help identify and develop new exploration opportunities both within the CameronCedartree tenements and more regionally within the Cameron-Pipestone-Rowan Lake district. This will draw upon both public domain and proprietary datasets (primarily geophysical) and aims to identify litho-structural domains that the Company can focus its efforts on with the best chance of discovery.
Going forward, based on the orientation MMI survey the Company plans to extend geochemical soil sampling coverage to the main structural corridors identified from interpretations of the recently acquired aeromagnetic and VTEM surveys.
Diamond drilling is currently planned for the September Quarter to follow-up on targets generated from the different exploration work programs currently underway.
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results in relation to the Cameron Gold Camp Project is based on information compiled by Dr Doug Jones, a full-time employee and Director of Chalice Gold Mines Limited, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is a Chartered Professional Geologist. Dr Jones has sufficient experience in the field of activity being reported to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves, and is a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 – ‘Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects’. The Qualified Person has verified the data disclosed in this release, including sampling, analytical and test data underlying the information contained in this release. Dr Jones consents to the release of information in the form and context in which it appears here.
3. Cameron Gold Project NI43-101 Technical Report
Pursuant to TSX listing rules, the Company has prepared an NI43-101 Technical Report for the Cameron Gold Camp Project. This report has been prepared by independent consultant geologist Peter Ball of DataGeo Geological Consultants.
The Cameron deposit resources have also been updated to current CIM and JORC 2012 standards, incorporating additional QA/QC studies undertaken by the Company. The impact of these revisions has been minimal, mainly involving the relegation of some underground Indicated Resources to the Inferred category (see ASX Release of 28 July, 2014 for further details).
5
4. Rainy River Project
Results were received from the 55-hole till sampling drill program completed during the March Quarter. Targets drilled included Hydra, Conqueror, Leviathan, Naiad, Revenge and Temeraire.
The results of the till sampling are currently being assessed within the context of a reinterpretation of the regional geology based on public domain and proprietary geophysical and geochemical datasets that the Company undertook during the Quarter.
5. GeoCrystal Limited (Equity Interest in GeoCrystal of 24% plus options) – Webb Diamond Project
Geocrystal has completed a detailed, high-resolution aeromagnetic survey over the main tenement block covering the Webb kimberlite field and over a tenement covering a separate target to the north east. The survey comprised 11,800 line-km at a 100m line spacing.
Interpretation of this detailed dataset by a consulting geophysicist has increased the number of kimberlite targets in the Webb field from 80 to 280. The significant increase in the number of aeromagnetic targets is a result of the closer line spacing and higher resolution of the recent survey, which reveals features not apparent in the previous surveys.
Planning of heritage surveys over the new targets is well advanced, after which a 5,000-6,000m RC drilling programme is anticipated to start in early August. The drilling strike rate to date has been high with 10 kimberlite bodies identified from drilling of 16 aeromagnetic targets. Drilling of six of these targets did not penetrate the cover rocks and they remain to be tested.
The objective of the next phase of drilling will be to obtain unweathered samples from a spread of target clusters throughout the field and from priority targets identified from the recent aeromagnetic survey and loam sampling. These samples will then be tested for both micro and macro diamonds.
Joint venture partner GeoCrystal has earned a 51% interest in Meteoric’s interest in the tenements and elected to continue to sole fund exploration on the Webb kimberlite field discovery. Following completion of the current exploration work program, GeoCrystal expects to have met the requirement to sole fund the first $2 million of expenditure to earn 70% of Meteoric’s interest in the JV. Chalice currently has a 24% equity interest in GeoCrystal with options and first rights over future funding to a 51% interest in GeoCrystal.
For further details please see Meteoric Resources (ASX codes: MEI and MEICA) announcement dated 16 July 2014.
6. Oodnadatta and Marla Project
During the Quarter, following a corporate review of exploration projects, Chalice withdrew from the farm-in joint venture with Uranium Equities Limited over the Marla and Oodnadatta Projects. Chalice retains no interest in the projects going forward.
7. Mogoraib North VMS Project, Eritrea
Exploration at Mogoraib North during the Quarter focused on the completion of seven diamond drill-holes and the deepening of an existing hole on the Mogoraib River trend. Total metres drilled were 1,590m, bringing the project total to 65 holes for 12,047m.
While several holes intersected various amounts of stringer, semi-massive and massive sulphide and confirmed the presence of a stacked VMS system consisting of at least four separate ‘horizons’, base and precious metal grades continue to be sub-economic. On the basis of these results, Chalice has made the decision to exit the Mogoraib North JV and wind up operations in Eritrea.
Complete results from the latest round of drilling at Mogoraib North are provided in Appendix 3.
6
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results in relation to the Mogoraib North Project is based on information compiled by Dr Doug Jones, a full-time employee and Director of Chalice Gold Mines Limited, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is a Chartered Professional Geologist. Dr Jones has sufficient experience in the field of activity being reported to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves, and is a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 – ‘Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects’. The Qualified Person has verified the data disclosed in this release, including sampling, analytical and test data underlying the information contained in this release. Dr Jones consents to the release of information in the form and context in which it appears here.
8. Share Buyback
In the March 2014 Quarter, Chalice announced an on-market share buyback of up to 25,073,088 ordinary shares as part of a capital management plan over the next 12 months.
10,036,591 shares have been acquired to date under the buy-back at an average price of 15.28 cents for a total of $1,554,356. At the end of June 2014, the total maximum remaining shares that can be acquired under the 10%/12 month rule is 15,036,497.
Chalice will continue to assess the merits of this capital management initiative as market conditions evolve.
9. Tenement schedules
In accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.3, please refer to Appendix 1 for listing of tenements.
10. Discussion on Quarterly Cash flow
Chalice’s cash reserves were A$44.2 million as at 30 June 2014.
During the Quarter, the Company spent $1.9 million (YTD: $3.4 million) on exploration and evaluation activities, including a 2,600 m diamond drilling program and aeromagnetic and VTEM surveys over the western Cameron and West Cedartree tenements at the Cameron Project.
In addition, the Company spent $1.4 million (YTD: $1.6 million) acquiring 9,021,260 shares under the share buyback discussed in section 8 above and a further $1.3 million (YTD: $1.8 million) was spent to increase the Company’s interest in GeoCrystal Limited to 24%.
$0.4 million (YTD: $1.5 million) was spent on administration and overhead costs with the impact of foreign exchange rates for the Quarter being $0.4 million.
Further details are available in the attached Appendix 5B.
==> picture [89 x 53] intentionally omitted <==
BILL BENT Managing Director
30 July 2014
7
For further information, please contact:
For media inquiries, please contact:
Tim Goyder, Executive Chairman Bill Bent, Managing Director Nicholas Read Chalice Gold Mines Limited Read Corporate Telephone +61 9322 3960 Telephone: +618 9388 1474
Forward Looking Statements
This document may contain forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this document and Chalice Gold Mines Limited (the Company) does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by law or regulation.
Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect Company management’s expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the quantum and price of shares to be acquired under a share buyback, the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources, the realisation of mineral reserve estimates, the likelihood of exploration success, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production, capital expenditures, success of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims and limitations on insurance coverage.
In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as plans, expects or does not expect, is expected, budget, scheduled, estimates, forecasts, intends, anticipates or does not anticipate, or believes, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results may, could, would, might or will be taken, occur or be achieved or the negative of these terms or comparable terminology. By their very nature forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others; risks related to actual results of current exploration activities; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of mineral resources; possible variations in ore reserves, grade or recovery rates; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry, as well as those factors detailed from time to time in the Company’s interim and annual financial statements, all of which are filed and available for review on SEDAR at sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.
Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
8
Appendix 1 – Tenement schedules
The following information is provided in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.3 for the quarter ended 30 June 2014:
1. Listing of tenements held:
| Location | Project | Tenement No. |
Registered Holder | Nature of interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eritrea | Mogoraib North |
Exploration Licence |
Sub-Sahara Resources (Eritrea) Pty Ltd |
60% |
| Australia | Gnaweeda Project |
E51/0926 | Chalice Gold Mines Limited and Teck Australia PtyLtd |
12.03% |
| E51/0927 | Chalice Gold Mines Limited and Teck Australia PtyLtd |
12.03% | ||
| Canada | Refer below. |
2. Listing of tenements acquired (directly or beneficially) during the quarter:
| Location | Project | Tenement No. | Registered Holder | Nature of interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | Cameron Gold | Mining Licence - 108466 |
Cameron Gold Operations Ltd |
Acquired 20% with ownership now 100% |
3. Tenements relinquished, reduced or lapsed (directly or beneficially) during the quarter:
| Location | Project | Tenement Type |
Tenement No. |
Registered Holder | Nature of Interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | Marla | EL4655 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |
| EL4656 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4657 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4658 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4659 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4660 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4661 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL5390 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| Oodnadatta | EL4679 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | ||
| EL4682 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4683 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4684 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4686 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4687 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4688 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL4959 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| EL5144 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 0% - earning up to 70%. | |||
| Canada | Rainy River | Claim | 4268070 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% |
| Claim | 4268071 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | ||
| Claim | 4264665 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | ||
| Claim | 4264664 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% |
9
Tenements held (Canada)
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron | MiningLease | 108400 | CLM305. Claim K465069-K465075, K465351-K465358, K519950- K519965,K561022-K561025,K666295 |
Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | MiningLease | 108400 | CLM306, Claim K386816-K386818, K386888-K386900, K533901- K533908,K666294 |
Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | MiningLease | 107495 | K314926,K351875-K351876,K314928-K314931,K273821 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | Patented miningclaim | PA8441,42185-0720(LT) | K2766 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | Patented miningclaim | PA8442,42185-0722(LT) | K2767 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | Patented miningclaim | PA8443,42185-0724(LT) | K2768 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | Patented miningclaim | PA9901,42185-0726(LT) | K4712 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0208(LT) | K9990 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0586(LT) | K9991 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0585(LT) | K9992 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0577(LT) | K9993 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0587(LT) | K9994 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0578(LT) | K9995 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0588(LT) | K9996 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0579(LT) | K9997 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0581(LT) | K9999 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0807(LT) | K10000 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0583(LT) | K10010 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0584(LT) | K10011 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0580(LT) | K10058 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0796(LT) | K10024 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0799(LT) | K10025 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0801(LT) | K10026 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0803(LT) | K10027 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0593(LT) | K10028 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0594(LT) | K10029 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | Patented miningclaim | 42185-0595(LT) | K10030 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | MLO | 10384 | K4709 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | MLO | 10405 | K4711 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | MLO | 10406 | K4710 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
10
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron | MLO | 10407 | K4712 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | MLO | 3366 | K2767 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | MLO | 3367 | K2768 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| West Cedar | MLO | 11143 | K9990,K9992,K9993,K9996,K9999,K10000,K10011,K10058 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
| Cameron | Claim | 1105444 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1105445 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1161574 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1161575 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210120 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210121 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210122 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210123 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210124 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210125 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210126 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210128 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210129 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210130 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210131 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210132 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210133 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210134 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210135 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 1210136 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4254297 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258281 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258282 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258283 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258284 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258285 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258286 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258287 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258288 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
11
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron | Claim | 4258289 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258290 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258291 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258292 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258421 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258422 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258423 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258424 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258425 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258426 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258427 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258428 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258429 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258430 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258431 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258432 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258433 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258434 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258435 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258436 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258437 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258438 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258439 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258440 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258441 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258442 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258443 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258444 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258445 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258446 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258447 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258448 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4258449 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% |
12
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron | Claim | 4258450 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4257392 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4255667 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4255668 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | Claim | 4255669 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 3000802 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 3000803 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 3000804 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 1149862 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 1196649 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 3001240 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 3001298 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 3010497 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 3012199 | Cameron Gold Operations Ltd | 100% | |
| Cameron | MiningLease | 108466 | CLM289. Claims K527548-K527567,Nucanolan Property | Cameron Gold Operations Inc. | 100% |
| Cameron | Claim | 4248906 | BARKAUSKAS, EDWARD ANTHONY (40%). BERGEN,CINDRA LEE(60%) |
Earningin,option agreement | |
| West Cedar | MiningLease | 107494 | K314927,K314932,K351873,K351874,K351877,K351878 | 525400 ONTARIO INC. | Option to purchase between HLM & Dubenski, (MR and SR). |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254475 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254476 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254477 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254478 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254479 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254472 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254480 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254481 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254482 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254483 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4254484 | CoventryResources Ontario Inc. | 100% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1022635 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1022636 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1022637 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1135465 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1135466 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% |
13
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardeen | Claim | 1157496 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1157497 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1157666 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1157667 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1157668 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1157670 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1157671 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1164874 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1164875 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1164876 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1164877 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172315 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172316 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172317 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172340 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172345 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172346 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172347 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172348 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172349 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172350 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172355 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172356 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172365 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172366 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172367 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172368 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172369 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172375 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172385 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172386 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172387 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172388 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% |
14
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172395 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1172396 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1195937 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1195940 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1196147 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1196239 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1196240 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1196870 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1196921 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1196923 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1196924 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1202036 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1202264 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1202265 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1202302 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1205201 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1205202 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1205203 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1205204 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1205287 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1209440 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1209441 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1209470 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1209697 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1209698 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1209770 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1210243 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1210245 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1210776 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1210792 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215147 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215148 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215149 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% |
15
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215450 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215451 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215452 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215453 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215454 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215751 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215752 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215758 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215760 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215831 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1215859 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1217105 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 1224629 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 3001505 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 3001506 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 3001507 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677468 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677469 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677470 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677471 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677472 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677473 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677474 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677475 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677476 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677477 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677478 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 677479 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786521 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786522 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786523 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786524 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786525 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% |
16
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardeen | Claim | 786526 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786527 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786528 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786529 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786541 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786542 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786543 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786544 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 786545 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813157 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813158 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813159 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813160 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813161 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813162 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813163 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813164 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813165 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 813166 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835178 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835179 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835184 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835185 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835186 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835187 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835188 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835189 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835190 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835195 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835196 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835197 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835304 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835305 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% |
17
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardeen | Claim | 835306 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835307 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835308 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835309 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835310 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835311 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835312 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 835313 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 863760 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 873515 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 873516 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 873517 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 873518 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 873519 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 873520 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| Ardeen | Claim | 873522 | Pele Gold Corporation | 51% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4250316 | CoventryRainyRiver Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4250319 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4265461 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4265465 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4265462 | CoventryRainyRiver Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4265463 | CoventryRainyRiver Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4274467 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4274468 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4274469 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4274460 | Coventry Rainy River Inc. | 100% | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4260559 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4260560 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4260561 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4260562 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4260563 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4260564 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4260565 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4205809 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement |
18
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4205814 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4205815 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4205816 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4205817 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4205818 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4214438 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4214439 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4214440 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4214441 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4214442 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4267980 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4267981 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4267982 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Claim | 4267983 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4254638 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4257501 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4257508 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4257510 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4257511 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4257515 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4257516 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4257517 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4260366 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4260515 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4260516 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4263609 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4272273 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4266941 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4266942 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4266943 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| South Cedar | Claim | 4266944 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| West Cedar | Claim | 4260514 | English,PerryVern | Earningin,option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0030 | Joan Solomon | Earningin,Option agreement |
19
| Project | Tenement Type | Patent, PIN Number | Claim Number | Registered Holder | Percentage Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0007 | Joan Solomon | Earningin,Option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0077 | Shane & Rachel McQuaker | Earningin,Option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0079 | Jan Wullum | Earningin,Option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0086 | Gene Boyce | Earningin,Option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0076 | Stevan Michael | Earningin,Option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0031 | KipSharp | Earningin,Option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0034 | Wade Kempka | Earningin,Option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0038 | Wade & Shane Kempka & Madison | Earningin,Option agreement | |
| RainyRiver | Patent | 56046-0044 | Wade & Shane Kempka & Madison | Earningin,Option agreement |
20
Appendix 2 – Cameron Gold Camp Project Drill Results
| Hole ID | Prospect | UTM Coordinates* | UTM Coordinates* | UTM Coordinates* | Dip (°) |
Azim (°) |
EOH (m) |
Intercept (m) | Intercept (m) | Intercept (m) | Grade Aug/t |
Predominant lithology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | From | To | **Width ** | |||||||
| CAD-14-001 Ajax CAD-14-001 Ajax |
450540 5458513 365 -45 180 208 14.80 15.30 0.50 3.18 Dolerite 24.55 25.35 0.80 1.23 Dolerite |
|||||||||||
| CAD-14-002 Ajax |
450397 5458451 354 -45 360 185 32.30 33.00 0.70 1.44 Dolerite |
|||||||||||
| CAD-14-003 Ajax |
64.00 65.05 1.05 2.00 Dolerite |
|||||||||||
| CAD-14-004 Ajax CAD-14-005 Ajax |
450481 5458452 350 -60 360 221 24.00 25.00 1.00 1.52 Dolerite 103.50 104.20 0.70 4.43 Chlorite-dominant schist |
|||||||||||
| CCD-14-240 Jupiter |
446277 5460542 361 -60 225 125 No significant intersections |
|||||||||||
| CCD-14-241 Jupiter |
446363 5460627 365 -60 225 138.5 109.85 110.75 0.90 2.78 Basalt |
|||||||||||
| CCD-14-242 Jupiter |
446475 5460729 365 -60 225 152 94.00 95.00 1.00 1.95 Basalt |
|||||||||||
| CCD-14-243 Jupiter |
446426 5460565 372 -60 225 182 96.90 97.90 1.00 2.56 Basalt |
|||||||||||
| CCD-14-244 Jupiter |
446548 5460538 366 -60 225 128 No significant intersections |
|||||||||||
| CHD-14-001 Hermione 450623 5459167 367 -45 180 244 No significant intersections |
||||||||||||
| CHD-14-002 Hermione 450545 5459149 368 -45 180 181 No significant intersections |
||||||||||||
| CJD-14-001 Juno 447715 5459659 376 -45 45 200 No significant intersections |
||||||||||||
| CJD-14-002 Juno 447850 5459780 375 -45 225 199 No significant intersections |
||||||||||||
| CJD-14-003 Juno 447915 5459845 378 -45 225 163 91.00 92.00 1.00 3.35 Dolerite CJD-14-003 Juno 138.60 139.60 1.00 3.80 Chlorite-dominant schist |
- UTM (NAD83) Zone 15 - to within 3m accuracy, collected by hand-held Garmin GPS MAP62st
21
Appendix 3 – Mogoraib North Drill Results
| Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | Table 1. Drilling results from Mogoraib River VMS trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hole ID | UTM Coordinates* | Dip | Azim | EOH | Intercept (m) | Grade | ||||||||
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | Width | Aug/t | Ag g/t | Cu % | S % | Zn % | |
| MOGD00006 | 338025 1731090 509 -60 90 252 No significant assays |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00021 and and and |
339900 1730799 506 -60 270 204 133.00 134.00 1.0 0.04 <0.5 0.02 5.59 0.22 145.00 150.00 5.0 0.10 7.48 0.86 37.08 1.33 151.00 152.00 1.0 0.06 <0.5 0.03 11.96 0.55 154.50 157.00 2.5 0.28 8.22 0.49 22.54 1.18 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00024 and and |
339940 1730800 507 -60 270 336 199.00 200.00 1.0 0.05 1.70 0.08 11.80 0.14 206.00 209.00 3.0 0.16 4.95 0.42 27.34 0.09 215.00 217.00 2.0 0.08 1.43 0.16 21.10 0.60 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00025 | 339900 1730960 506 -60 270 189 128.00 129.00 1.0 0.03 10.30 0.25 17.53 1.08 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00026 and |
339820 1730800 506 -60 270 90 21.00 22.50 1.5 <0.005 3.27 0.01 0.69 0.02 26.00 27.50 1.5 0.02 8.10 0.01 0.64 0.003 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00027 | 339569 1729703 522 -50 135 78 48.00 58.00 10.0 0.02 1.10 0.11 8.29 0.01 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00028 and and including qu and including qu |
339425 1729000 506 -60 270 141 93.00 100.00 7.0 0.11 5.19 0.40 11.33 0.62 103.00 104.00 1.0 0.07 2.80 0.43 4.66 0.30 146.00 149.00 3.0 0.31 10.73 0.81 27.71 1.34 arter core samples within well defined mineralised interv 146.30 148.10 1.8 0.39 12.34 1.12 28.85 1.96 153.00 156.00 3.0 0.33 17.80 1.86 24.49 0.47 arter core samples within well defined mineralised interv 153.05 155.85 2.8 0.40 18.35 2.07 23.93 0.63 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00029 including including |
339900 1730720 507 -60 270 240 168.00 172.00 4.0 0.31 3.05 0.24 13.28 0.78 168.00 169.00 1.0 0.08 0.90 0.02 19.51 2.01 170.00 172.00 2.0 0.56 5.65 0.46 13.39 0.53 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00030 | 340880 1732800 494 -60 270 93 No significant assays** |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00031 | 339465 1729012 506 -60 270 164 145.00 148.00 3.0 0.02 2.50 0.18 10.67 0.45 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00032 including and and including and and |
339875 1732796 500 -60 270 177 90.00 93.00 3.0 0.01 3.97 0.04 9.29 0.89 90.00 92.00 2.0 0.01 5.55 0.05 11.59 1.24 96.00 97.00 1.0 <0.005 <0.5 0.01 4.84 0.41 114.00 116.00 2.0 <0.005 0.85 0.02 5.93 0.23 114.00 115.00 1.0 <0.005 <0.5 0.02 2.47 0.29 119.00 122.00 3.0 0.00 2.35 0.00 3.49 0.14 124.00 125.00 1.0 <0.005 1.20 0.02 6.62 0.13 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00033 | 339840 1731970 502 -90 143 No significant assays** |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00039 | 343850 1741800 502 -60 240 140 No significant assays** |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00045 and and and including including |
340055 1730880 506 -60 270 394 324.00 326.00 2.0 0.02 <0.5 0.16 4.15 0.04 332.00 333.00 1.0 0.02 <0.5 0.08 1.47 0.01 340.00 340.50 0.5 0.01 <0.5 0.15 6.38 0.01 343.00 346.50 3.5 0.20 1.50 0.25 13.63 0.08 343.00 343.50 0.5 0.01 0.70 0.11 7.49 0.02 344.50 346.50 2.0 0.33 2.45 0.37 18.77 0.12 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00046 including including and including including and and |
340000 1730880 505 -60 313 313 252.00 256.00 4.0 0.01 0.40 0.10 4.32 0.09 253.00 254.00 1.0 <0.005 <0.5 0.07 2.96 0.06 255.00 256.00 1.0 0.05 1.60 0.22 7.25 0.08 264.00 268.00 4.0 0.01 0.28 0.06 6.06 0.22 264.00 265.00 1.0 0.01 <0.5 0.05 6.16 0.54 265.00 266.00 1.0 0.02 1.10 0.14 5.06 0.06 271.00 272.00 1.0 0.01 1.30 0.34 16.77 0.02 279.00 281.50 2.5 0.06 3.20 0.43 10 0.06 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00047 and and |
340000 1730960 505 -60 270 304 238.00 239.00 1.0 0.02 0.60 0.07 3 0.07 245.00 248.00 3.0 0.04 1.13 0.23 6 0.02 264.00 268.70 4.7 0.01 0.92 0.11 12 0.06 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00048 and and and |
340000 1731040 504 -60 270 283 225.00 228.00 3.0 0.01 <0.5 0.09 2.54 0.02 230.00 231.00 1.0 0.02 <0.5 0.10 2.77 0.01 243.00 246.25 3.3 0.03 0.79 0.09 10.33 0.02 250.50 251.20 0.7 0.05 2.30 0.17 26.68 0.06 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00049 | 339910 1732850 225 -60 285 229 No significant assays** |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00050 and and |
340035 1735299.4 486 -60 270 99.00 100.00 1.0 0.05 <0.5 0.01 6.39 0.21 106.00 107.00 1.0 <0.005 <0.5 0.01 1.57 0.29 112.00 115.00 3.0 <0.005 <0.5 0.01 1.88 0.42 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00053 and and including |
339425 1729015 506 -60 325 205 100.00 107.00 7.0 0.13 7.04 0.52 12.61 1.00 108.00 110.00 2.0 0.03 1.95 0.15 6.385 0.28 181.00 186.55 5.6 0.13 8.91 0.95 20.54 0.68 183.00 186.55 3.6 0.19 13.06 1.38 31.42 1.03 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00054 | 340034 1732000 503 -60 270 100 No significant assays(IP target) |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00055 | 339993 1732800 500 -60 270 100 57.00 58.00 1.0 0.07 1.80 0.05 8.77 0.44 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00056 | 339793 1733000 501 -60 270 91 No significant assays(IP target)** |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00057 | 339850 1732575 500 -60 270 274 No significant assays(IP target) |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00058 | 340265 1731100 507 -75 270 340 No significant assays** |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00059 | 339504 1729300 514 -70 270 195 Highest assay= 0.027% Cu,0.01% Zn |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00060 | 339426 1729098 513 -60 270 203.5 44.00 48.00 4.00 0.07 3.70 0.37 13.39 1.11 |
|||||||||||||
| and | 52.00 54.00 2.00 0.05 1.00 0.15 3.51 0.23 |
|||||||||||||
| and and including including including and and |
88.00 90.00 2.00 0.00 <0.5 0.06 3.35 0.00 125.00 140.00 15.00 0.07 4.51 0.44 10.17 0.60 125.00 129.00 4.00 0.14 12.63 1.19 10.93 0.31 127.00 128.00 1.00 0.09 29.00 1.80 14.90 0.27 133.00 134.00 1.00 0.04 2.70 0.22 31.57 3.84 146.00 147.00 1.00 0.02 0.70 0.17 2.14 0.08 150.00 151.00 1.00 0.05 <0.5 0.08 3.17 0.04 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00061 | 339515 1729200 512 -60 270 314 Highest assay= 0.04% Cu,0.01% Zn |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00062 | 339714 1730149 514 -60 270 224 Highest assay= 0.014% Cu,0.02% Zn |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00063 | 339654 1729632 553 -55 270 239.5 151.00 158.00 7.00 0.06 1.68 0.23 5.30 0.09 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00064 MOGD00064 including |
339411 1728935 510 -60 270 251 121.40 122.00 0.60 0.04 0.90 0.22 6.55 0.06 156.50 159.00 2.50 0.20 2.91 0.42 7.11 0.29 156.50 157.05 0.55 0.81 12.30 1.60 28.98 1.16 |
|||||||||||||
| MOGD00065 | 339340 1729700 507 -60 270 126 No samples collected - no visual mineralisation |
|||||||||||||
| * WGS84 Zo | ne 37N - to within 3m accuracy, collected by hand-held Garmin GPS MAP62s | |||||||||||||
| ** No signifi | cant mineralisation: 1m samples collected at 10m intervals |
22
| Table 2. Drilling results | Table 2. Drilling results | Table 2. Drilling results | from Mogoraib North Silver Anomaly Prospect | from Mogoraib North Silver Anomaly Prospect | from Mogoraib North Silver Anomaly Prospect | from Mogoraib North Silver Anomaly Prospect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hole ID UTM Coordinates* |
Dip | Azim | EOH | **Intercept ** | (m) Grade |
|||||
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | width(m) Aug/t Ag g/t Cu % |
S % | Zn % |
| MOGD00007 335760 | 1731700 | 505 | -60 | 90 | 234 | 224.00 | 225.00 | 1.0 <0.005 21.00 0.00 |
3.73 | 0.03 |
| MOGD00008 333445 | 1728820 | 523 | -60 | 112 | 159 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||
| MOGD00009 334190 | 1733590 | 495 | -60 | 225 | 309 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||
| MOGD00010 334200 | 1732865 | 499 | -60 | 90 | 150 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||
| MOGD00011 336890 | 1737050 | 483 | -60 | 270 | 300 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||
| MOGD00015 335015 | 1731500 | 511 | -60 | 90 | 141 | No significant mineralisation | ||||
| MOGD00016 334190 | 1732900 | 498 | -75 | 90 | 140 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||
| MOGD00017 334194 | 1732900 | 498 | -75 | 270 | 126 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||
| MOGD00018 335200 | 1731390 | 513 | -70 | 90 | 81 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||
| MOGD00019 335621 | 1731603 | 509 | -75 | 90 | 176 | No significant mineralisation | ||||
| MOGD00020 336110 | 1731605 | 500 | -60 | 90 | 181.5 | 97.00 | 98.00 | 1.0 <0.005 <0.5 0.17 |
0.87 | 0.01 |
| * WGS84 Zone 37N - | to within 3m accuracy, collected by hand-held Garmin GPS MAP62s | |||||||||
| *** No significant mineralisation: | 1m samples collected at 20m intervals | |||||||||
| Table 3. Drilling results from Lokage Gossan Prospect | ||||||||||
| Hole ID UTM Coordinates* |
Dip | Azim | EOH | **Intercept ** | Grade (m) |
|||||
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | width(m) Aug/t Ag g/t Cu % |
S % | Zn % |
| MOGD00034 345900 | 1732600 | 506 | -75 | 270 | 159 | 128.00 | 129.50 | 1.5 0.01 4.68 0.23 |
>10% | 0.04 |
| Hole ID | UTM Coordinates* | UTM Coordinates* | UTM Coordinates* | Dip | Azim | EOH | **Intercept ** | **Intercept ** | (m) | Grade | Grade | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | width(m) | Aug/t | Ag g/t | Cu % | S % | Zn % | ||
| MOGD00034 | 345900 | 1732600 | 506 | -75 | 270 | 159 | 128.00 | 129.50 | 1.5 | 0.01 | 4.68 | 0.23 | >10% | 0.04 | |
| Table 4. Drilling results from Central Granite | |||||||||||||||
| Hole ID | UTM Coordinates* | Dip | Azim | EOH | **Intercept ** | (m) | Grade | ||||||||
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | width(m) | Aug/t | Ag g/t | Cu % | S_% | Zn % | ||
| MOGD00035 | 342950 | 1739100 | 502 | -75 | 90 | 135 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||||
| MOGD00036 | 338100 | 1740130 | 485 | -60 | 90 | 99 | 85.00 | 89.00 | 4.0 | <0.005 | 1.60 | 0.02 | 5.59 | 0.02 | |
| MOGD00037 | 338510 | 1740200 | 482 | -60 | 90 | 51 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||||
| MOGD00038 | 342690 | 1738420 | 500 | -60 | 135 | 99 | 35.00 | 36.50 | 1.5 | 0.12 | 10.20 | 0.08 | 7.30 | 0.41 | |
| MOGD00040 | 341555 | 1741825 | 497 | -60 | 90 | 180 | 99.00 | 101.00 | 2.0 | 0.02 | 2.50 | 0.02 | 4.57 | 0.66 | |
| MOGD00051 | 344120 | 1741500 | 502 | -60 | 90 | 275 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||||
| MOGD00052 | 341550 | 1741800 | 495 | -60 | 90 | 127 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||||
| * WGS84 Zone 37N - | to within 3m accuracy, collected by hand-held Garmin GPS MAP62s | ||||||||||||||
| *** No significant mineralisation: | 1m samples collected at 20m intervals | ||||||||||||||
| Table | 5. Drilling results from Area C | ||||||||||||||
| Hole ID | UTM Coordinates* | Dip | Azim | EOH | **Intercept ** | (m) | Grade | ||||||||
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | width(m) | Aug/t | Ag g/t | Cu % | S % | Zn % | ||
| MOGD00041 | 346550 | 1748445 | 516 | -60 | 225 | 129 | No significant assays | ||||||||
| MOGD00042 | 345720 | 1748830 | 520 | -60 | 135 | 198 | 104.00 | 107.00 | 3.0 | <0.005 | <0.5 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 0.19 | |
| and | 147.00 | 148.00 | 1.0 | <0.005 | <0.5 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 0.10 | |||||||
| and | 152.00 | 155.00 | 3.0 | 0.02 | <0.5 | 0.01 | 1.69 | 0.53 | |||||||
| MOGD00043 | 346028 | 1748022 | 517 | -60 | 200 | 201 | 49.00 | 50.00 | 1.0 | 0.66 | <0.5 | 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.01 |
| Table | 5. Drilling results from Area C | 5. Drilling results from Area C | 5. Drilling results from Area C | 5. Drilling results from Area C | 5. Drilling results from Area C | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hole ID | UTM Coordinates* | Dip | Azim | EOH | **Intercept ** | (m) Grade |
||||||
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | width(m) Aug/t Ag g/t Cu % |
S % | Zn % | ||
| MOGD00041 | 346550 | 1748445 | 516 | -60 | 225 | 129 | No significant assays | |||||
| MOGD00042 | 345720 | 1748830 | 520 | -60 | 135 | 198 | 104.00 | 107.00 | 3.0 <0.005 <0.5 0.00 |
2.52 | 0.19 | |
| and | 147.00 | 148.00 | 1.0 <0.005 <0.5 0.00 |
1.35 | 0.10 | |||||||
| and | 152.00 | 155.00 | 3.0 0.02 <0.5 0.01 |
1.69 | 0.53 | |||||||
| MOGD00043 | 346028 | 1748022 | 517 | -60 | 200 | 201 | 49.00 | 50.00 | 1.0 0.66 <0.5 0.01 |
0.89 | 0.01 | |
| * WGS84 Zone 37N - to within 3m accuracy, collected by hand-held Garmin GPS MAP62s | ||||||||||||
| Table 6. Drilling results from | regional holes(Southwest Layered Gabbro, Hashekito, Bisha trend) | |||||||||||
| Hole ID | UTM Coordinates* | Dip | Azim | EOH | **Intercept ** | Grade (m) |
||||||
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | width(m) Aug/t Ag g/t Cu % |
S % | Zn % | ||
| MOGD00001 | 340940 | 1725795 | 516 | -60 | 90 | 191 | No significant assays | |||||
| MOGD00002 | 341030 | 1725990 | 518 | -60 | 90 | 151 | No significant assays | |||||
| MOGD00003 | 341413 | 1726322 | 514 | -50 | 100 | 120 | No significant mineralisation*** | |||||
| MOGD00004 | 342872 | 1725818 | 518 | -65 | 325 | 252 | No significant mineralisation*** | |||||
| MOGD00005 | 341700 | 1728955 | 507 | -60 | 105 | 240 | No significant mineralisation*** | |||||
| MOGD00012 | 330355 | 1725855 | 532 | -60 | 90 | 102 | No significant mineralisation*** | |||||
| MOGD00013 | 330150 | 1725905 | 533 | -75 | 270 | 50 | No significant mineralisation*** | |||||
| MOGD00014 | 330380 | 1726210 | 530 | -65 | 80 | 138 | No significant mineralisation*** | |||||
| MOGD00022 | 344708 | 1727396 | 511 | -60 | 250 | 126 | No significant mineralisation*** | |||||
| MOGD00023 | 345450 | 1728098 | 519 | -60 | 250 | 211 | No significant mineralisation*** | |||||
| MOGD00044 | 346240 | 1730200 | 506 | -60 | 270 | 135 | No significant mineralisation*** |
| Table 6. Drilling results from | Table 6. Drilling results from | Table 6. Drilling results from | **regional holes(Southwest Layered Gabbro, ** | **regional holes(Southwest Layered Gabbro, ** | **regional holes(Southwest Layered Gabbro, ** | **regional holes(Southwest Layered Gabbro, ** | **regional holes(Southwest Layered Gabbro, ** | Hashekito, Bisha trend) | Hashekito, Bisha trend) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hole ID | UTM Coordinates* | Dip | Azim | EOH | **Intercept ** | (m) | Grade | ||||||
| **East(m) ** | North(m) | RL(m) | (°) | (°) | (m) | From | To | width(m) | Aug/t Ag g/t Cu % |
S % | Zn % | ||
| MOGD00001 | 340940 | 1725795 | 516 | -60 | 90 | 191 | No significant assays | ||||||
| MOGD00002 | 341030 | 1725990 | 518 | -60 | 90 | 151 | No significant assays | ||||||
| MOGD00003 | 341413 | 1726322 | 514 | -50 | 100 | 120 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| MOGD00004 | 342872 | 1725818 | 518 | -65 | 325 | 252 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| MOGD00005 | 341700 | 1728955 | 507 | -60 | 105 | 240 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| MOGD00012 | 330355 | 1725855 | 532 | -60 | 90 | 102 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| MOGD00013 | 330150 | 1725905 | 533 | -75 | 270 | 50 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| MOGD00014 | 330380 | 1726210 | 530 | -65 | 80 | 138 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| MOGD00022 | 344708 | 1727396 | 511 | -60 | 250 | 126 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| MOGD00023 | 345450 | 1728098 | 519 | -60 | 250 | 211 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| MOGD00044 | 346240 | 1730200 | 506 | -60 | 270 | 135 | No significant mineralisation*** | ||||||
| * WGS84 Zone 37N - | to within 3m accuracy, collected by hand-held Garmin GPS MAP62s | ||||||||||||
| *** No significant mineralisation: | 1m samples collected at 20m intervals |
23
Appendix 4 – Cameron Gold Camp Project JORC 2012 Tables
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling techniques |
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
Diamond drilling was used to obtain a continuous core from the overburden bedrock interface to a final end of hole depth which was based on the geology intersected. Intervals of recovered core selected for analysis were identified based on geological criteria including a combination of lithology, alteration assemblage and or the presence of sulphides. Sample intervals were predominately 1.0m in length, but ranged from 0.4 to 1.0m. Each interval was preceded and followed by 1.0-2.0m of shoulder samples extending out beyond the interval of interest. The core selected for sampling was split and samples of half core were dispatched to a certified commercial laboratory for preparation and analysis of gold according to industry standard practises. |
| Drilling techniques |
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what _method, etc). _ |
Drilling was NQ diamond core. Core was oriented using a Reflex ACT III tool. |
| Drill sample recovery |
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. |
Diamond drillhole core recoveries and RQD are logged. Measurements are taken systematically down hole between core blocks i.e. ~3 metre increments. Recoveries are generally good with majority > 95% |
24
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. |
Based on drilling method being diamond core and the near 100% core recovery the sampling is representative. |
|
| Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
Whilst no assessment has been undertaken the competency of the core would tend to preclude any potential issue of sampling bias. |
|
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. |
Geological logging of major characteristics such as rock type, alteration, sulphide abundance etc has occurred in summary and detail. Basic geotechnical logging including RQD, orientation data for structures (faults, veins, bedding etc).has also been undertaken The geological and geotechnical logging is at an appropriate level for the stage of exploration being undertaken. |
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. |
The logging of the geological features was predominately qualitative. Parameters such as sulphide abundances are visual estimates by the logging geologist. Core is photographed after metre marks and sample intervals have been clearly marked on the core. The core was photographed dry and wet. |
|
| The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
The entire length of all holes, excluding any surface casing was logged. |
|
| Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. |
Core was cut longitudinally with a masonry saw and a half core sampled for analysis, the residual half core is retained in the core box for reference |
| If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry |
Only diamond drill core was sampled. | |
| For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the samplepreparation technique. |
The splitting of core by masonry saw is an appropriate sample technique |
|
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. |
Documented procedures are in place to ensure that core is sampled systematically and the same methodology is applied to each sample and every drilling campaign. |
|
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field _duplicate/second-half sampling. _ |
Replicate samples are submitted with each sample submission at a ratio of 1:20. A replicate sample consists of the original half core sample cut by masonry saw into 2 equal |
25
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| halves and submitted | ||
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
The sample sizes are considered appropriate | |
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. |
Samples are submitted for preparation and gold analysis to an accredited lab, Actlabs (Thunder Bay, Canada). Sample preparation comprised: (i) drying for a minimum of 8 hours, (ii) mill crushing to >70% passing 2mm, (iii) riffle splitting (using a Jones Splitter) to approximately 250g, (iv) disk pulverizing of subsample to 85% passing 75 microns. (v) sample is then split to 30g for analysis, by fire assay and determination by atomic absorption. The detection limits are 5 ppb (lower) and 3000ppb (upper). Above detection are re-analysed by fire assay and gravimetric determination The detection limits are 0.03ppm (lower) and 10,000ppm (upper). The analysis technique is considered total and is appropriate for the determination of the level of gold anticipated. |
| For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. |
No geophysical tools of these types were used. |
|
| Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
At this stage of the prospects evaluation, QC procedures involve a review of laboratory supplied internal QA/QC and in house controls, including routinely inserting commercial (and appropriate grade) certified reference standards, samples of “barren” material (Uncertified Blanks) and replicate samples with each sample submission |
|
| Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. |
The significant intersections have been reviewed by the Exploration Manager |
| The use of twinned holes. | No twinned holes were drilled during this round of drilling. |
|
| Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data |
Primary data was recorded on laptop computers directlyinto standardized Excel |
26
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
logging templates with built in look-up codes. This information is merged with the assay certificate data into an in-house database system managed internally. |
|
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
There was no adjustment of assay data | |
| Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. |
Drill collar locations coordinates were surveyed using handheld Garmin GPS Downhole surveys were collected as single shot readings during drilling. The first survey was taken as soon as practical beyond the casing and then at every 30 to 40 m intervals down hole |
| Specification of the grid system used. |
The grid system is UTM_NAD83, Zone 15 | |
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
Topographic control is taken from an aerial survey flown by ATLIS Geomatics of Winnipeg, Manitoba in 2010. The survey provided a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) contoured at one metre intervals. |
|
| Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. |
The drill hole spacing is specific to each prospect, refer to figures in main text |
| Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. |
The drilling undertaken was exploratory in nature and no mineralized geological domains have been defined to support the definition of Mineral Resources |
|
| Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
No compositing has been applied | |
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. |
Due to topographic constraints and variation in strike of the stratigraphy at the various prospects, drilling was completed at various orientations to ensure that the holes were drilled perpendicular to stratigraphy and intersect the target areas. For this early stage of exploratory drilling in this manner is acceptable to provide initial geological control and intersect potential mineralization. With limited drilling at these prospects it is unknown at this stage if the drilling orientation produced biased sampling. |
| If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if |
At this stage no orientation based sampling bias has been identified. |
27
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| material. | ||
| Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
The core samples are placed in polyweave sacks and sealed with zip tie security tags by the sampler. A list of security tags with the corresponding sample numbers for each dispatch is recorded on site. The samples are either collected by or delivered to a commercial transport company who forward the samples to the laboratory. Upon arrival at the laboratory, personnel will verify the sample submission list and will send an e-mail to confirm receipt of samples, notify if any security tags or polyweave sacks are not intact and if there are additional or missing samples to those indicated on the sample submission sheet. |
| Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
No audit or review of the sampling techniques and data for this release has been carried out |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. |
Ajax and Hermione are located wholly within CLM 306, Juno and Jupiter are located wholly with CLM305 both of which comprise the Mine Lease 108400 The Mine lease108400 is held 100% by Cameron Gold Operations Ltd. a fully owned subsidiary of Chalice Gold Mines Ltd. |
| The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
The Lease 108400 is in good standing and no known impediments exist to continued exploration. |
|
| Exploration done by other parties |
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
Modern exploration at the Cameron Gold Project commenced in the 1960s and over the subsequent years numerous companies at various times have carried out prospecting, line cutting, geological mapping, trenching, soil and outcrop sampling, ground magnetic and ground geophysical surveys. The first drilling was undertaken in 1960 at what is now the Cameron Gold Deposit. To the best of Chalices knowledge with the exception of the Jupiter prospect no exploration drillinghas occurred on the other |
28
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| prospects highlighted in this report | ||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
The Cameron project setting is an Archaean granite-greenstone terrane. It is situated in the western end of the Late Archaean Savant Lake- Crow Lake Belt in the Western Wabigoon Subprovince of the Superior Province in north-western Ontario. The Savant Lake-Crow Lake Belt comprises a number of individual greenstone belts that are most commonly separated by large- scale faults and shear zones. Gold mineralization is being sought, with no deposit style being exclusively targeted. |
| Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drillhole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the holeo down hole length andinterception depth o hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
Refer to tabulations in the main text and Appendix 2. |
| Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. |
No averaging techniques or truncations were used. An 0.5g/t lower cut-off has been applied when reporting significant intersections. |
| Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail |
Aggregated assays for ‘significant’ intervals are based on individual average weighted values for the interval of >1g/t Au |
29
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
No metal equivalent values were quoted. | |
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true _width not known’). _ |
Down hole lengths have been reported, true widths not known. |
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
Refer to figures and tabulations in the main text and Appendices |
| Balanced reporting |
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
A summary of analytical results based on a 0.5g/t lower cut-off has been reported for all drill holes. |
| Other substantive exploration data |
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
All relevant exploration data is reported in the main text and Appendices |
| Further work | The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
Future work programs are being assessed but at this stage no additional drill follow-up is being contemplated. |
30
Appendix 5 – Mogoraib North Project JORC 2012 Tables
According to Clauses 18 & 19 of the 2012 JORC Code, the criteria listed in the following tables need to be addressed when reporting exploration results.
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
| JORC Criteria | Explanation | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • | Chalice has sampled diamond drill core, usually at 1m intervals unless geological contacts |
| techniques | dictate otherwise. | |
| • | Following geological and geotechnical (RQD) logging, core is cut lengthways down the axis | |
| to provide half core for assay, the remainder being retained in the core trays for record and | ||
| future reference/re-sampling. | ||
| Drilling | • | Chalice has conducted diamond drilling, with most drilling, including all drilling through |
| techniques | mineralised zones, being NQ with standard tube. | |
| • | Roller-cone drilling was used to the top of competent rock (typically 10-15m depth), where | |
| the holes were cased off and diamond drilling commenced. | ||
| Drill sample | • | Core recoveries are recorded by measuring actual versus theoretical core drilled and |
| recovery | monitored for excessive core loss. | |
| • | In zones of ‘bad ground’ there is the option to triple-tube but this has not been deemed | |
| necessary to date. | ||
| • | No relationship that might negatively affect representivity has been noted between | |
| mineralisation and core recoveries to date. | ||
| Logging | • | Core samples have been photographed, geologically and geotechnically logged with |
| lithology, mineralisation, alteration and structural features recorded in detail. | ||
| • | Core was not oriented but structures were measured relative to the core axis. | |
| • | Bulk density determinations using water immersion method are carried out on every metre | |
| of core within expected mineralisation and every 10m within waste zones. | ||
| • | 100% of the core was logged. | |
| Sub-sampling | • | Core was sampled using a diamond saw, with half core selected for assaying. |
| techniques and | • |
Pre-collar roller-cone sections of the holes were not sampled. |
| sample preparation |
• | Within visually mineralised zones, in this case >5% sulphides, samples have been taken at 1m intervals unless geological contacts dictate otherwise. |
| • | Outside of these zones 10cm samples have been collected at 10m intervals for geochemical | |
| characterization purposes. | ||
| • | One half of the core is retained on site whilst the other half (1-2kg) is bagged and | |
| dispatched to the Africa Horn Preparation facility (a division of NATA-accredited Intertek- | ||
| Genalysis Laboratories) in Asmara for crushing to -2mm and splitting. | ||
| • | The coarse reject is stored and the split sub‐sample is pulverized to a nominal 95% passing ‐ | |
| 75 micron using an LM2 pulverizer. | ||
| • | The pulverized pulp is further split into two 100g to 150g sub‐samples; a primary pulp | |
| sample is sent for analysis and a duplicate pulp sample is kept as a reference and the | ||
| remaining fine (-75 micron) reject is stored. | ||
| • | A quartz wash is pulverized between samples and is stored for random testing of | |
| preparation contamination. | ||
| • | The sample size is regarded as appropriate to the mineralisation being sampled (fine- to | |
| medium grained, banded massive to semi-massive base metal sulphides). | ||
| Quality of | • | The sample pulps are transported by air to NATA-accredited Intertek-Genalysis Laboratories |
| assay data and | in Perth Western Australia for assay. | |
| laboratory | • | Gold assaying is completed using a lead collection of 50g fire assay method with an atomic |
| tests | absorption spectroscopy (AAS) finish. | |
| • | Multi‐element assays are carried out by ICP‐OES on 25g sub‐sample prepared using aqua | |
| regia digest. |
31
| JORC Criteria | Explanation | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| • | Certified reference materials (CRMs) are submitted with all sample batches at the rate of 1 | |
| per 20 samples. The CRM’s inserted have values ranging from very low to high grade. | ||
| • | Blanks are inserted at 1 per 20 samples. | |
| • | QA/QC monitoring is applied to all drill core assays as per the protocols described above to | |
| ensure acceptable levels accuracy & precision. | ||
| • | Periodic external audits of QA/QC are conducted. | |
| • | Random sample batches are periodically re-assayed at an alternative lab. | |
| Verification of | • | Senior geological staff routinely checks logging and sampling procedures and sampled |
| sampling and | intervals vs visual mineralisation. | |
| assaying | • | Data is physically recorded on paper logs then entered on site into an AcQuire database. |
| • | Data validation is conducted by a data base manager. | |
| • | Physical and electronic datasets are backed up and stored on-site, in Asmara and in Perth. | |
| • | No adjustments are made to data other than check assays when inconsistent results are | |
| obtained. | ||
| • | No independent sampling has been undertaken to date. | |
| • | No holes have been twinned to date. | |
| Location of | • | Drillhole collars were located using a hand held Garmin GPS MAP62s with an accuracy of |
| data points | <3m. | |
| • | All drillholes were surveyed using a Reflex camera at 50m intervals minimum, and | |
| sometimes at 30m intervals. | ||
| • | Grid system used is WGS84 UTM Zone 37 North. | |
| • | External topographic controls have not been established. | |
| Data spacing | • | As noted above, sampling within mineralised zones has been conducted over nominal 1m |
| and | intervals with broader spaced sampling over non-mineralized zones. | |
| distribution | • | No pre-assay sample compositing has been used. |
| • | The sample density is regarded as appropriate for the deposit style in question. | |
| Orientation of | • | Core is cut to provide as close as possible duplicate halves based on structure and |
| data in relation | mineralisation (particularly visual bedding/banding) to minimise sampling bias. | |
| to geological | • | Core has not been oriented with down-hole orientation devices. |
| structure | ||
| Sample | • | Samples are held securely under the control of senior project staff from the drill rig until |
| security | submittal to the sample prep lab in Asmara. | |
| Audits or | • | No audits or reviews of Chalice’s sampling procedures or data has been conducted for the |
| reviews | Mogoraib Northproject to date. |
32
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
| JORC Criteria | Explanation | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • | Chalice’s tenure consists of a single Exploration Licence, Mogoraib North, held under a |
| tenement and | 60:40 Joint Venture between Chalice subsidiary Sub Sahara Resources (Eritrea) Pty Ltd and | |
| land tenure | the Eritrean National Mining Corporation (ENAMCO) | |
| status | • | The EL is in good-standing as of the date of this announcement. |
| Exploration | • | The property was held previously by Sanu Resources Limited. Sanu conducted stream |
| done by other | sediment and soil sampling, ground gravity, airborne EM over selected areas and drilled 3 | |
| parties | diamond drillholes. The core was not assayed by Sanu and a visual inspection confirmed no | |
| significant mineralisation was intersected. | ||
| Geology | • | The Mogoraib River mineralisation is of stratiform VMS type, mainly pyrite and pyrrhotite, |
| in a bi-modal volcano-sedimentary sequence that has been intruded by a late-tectonic | ||
| granitoid. | ||
| Drill hole | • | Refer to previously reported results. |
| Information | ||
| Data | • | All assay data provided is uncut. |
| aggregation | • | Aggregated assays for ‘significant’ intervals are based on individual average weighted |
| methods | values for the interval of >1g/t Au, >5g/t Ag, >0.5% Cu or >1% Zn. | |
| • | No metal equivalence values have been used. | |
| Relationship | • | Down-hole lengths reported. |
| between | • | Based on core to bedding angles and correlation of mineralised zones on sections true |
| mineralisation | widths are estimated at ~80% of intersection width. | |
| widths and | ||
| intercept | ||
| lengths | ||
| Diagrams | • | Refer to previously reported results. |
| Balanced | • | Results reported reference all available data including high and low grade results. |
| reporting | ||
| Other | • | Results of geological mapping are reported. |
| substantive | • | Results of geophysical surveys (FLTEM & MLTEM) noted in this announcement are being |
| exploration | analysed and will be reported in greater detail at a later date. | |
| data | • | No other material results are available. |
| Further work | • | Given the sub economic results of the last round of drilling no further drilling is |
| contemplated at this point. |
33
Rule 5.5
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/2013
Name of entity
Chalice Gold Mines Limited
ABN 47 116 648 956
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) 30 June 2014
Consolidated statement of cash flows
| Cash flows related to operating activities 1.1 Receipts from product sales and related debtors 1.2 Payments for (a) exploration & evaluation (b) development (c) production (d) administration 1.3 Dividends received 1.4 Interest and other items of a similar nature received 1.5 Interest and other costs of finance paid 1.6 Income taxes paid 1.7 Other (provide details if material) Net Operating Cash Flows |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (12 months) $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| 27 (1,960) - - (449) - 23 - - (705) |
117 (3,437) - - (1,536) - 95 - - (2,231) |
|
| (3,064) | (6,992) | |
| Cash flows related to investing activities 1.8 Payment for purchases of: (a) prospects (b) equity investments (c) other fixed assets 1.9 Proceeds from sale of: (a) prospects (b) equity investments (c) other fixed assets 1.10 Loans to other entities 1.11 Loans repaid by other entities 1.12 Other (provide details if material) Net investing cash flows 1.13 Total operating and investing cash flows (carried forward) |
- (1,270) (43) - - - - 108 (50) |
(877) (1,770) (107) - 4 - - 203 (102) |
| (1,255) | (2,649) | |
| (4,319) | (9,641) |
| 1.13 Total operating and investing cash flows (brought forward) |
(4,319) | (9,641) |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flows related to financing activities 1.14 Proceeds from issues of shares, options, etc. 1.15 Proceeds from sale of forfeited shares 1.16 Proceeds from borrowings 1.17 Repayment of borrowings 1.18 Dividends paid 1.19 Other (provide details if material) Net financing cash flows |
- - - - - (1,401) |
50 - - - - (1,572) |
| (1,401) | (1,522) | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash held 1.20 Cash at beginning of quarter/year to date 1.21 Exchange rate adjustments to item 1.20 1.22 Cash at end ofquarter |
(5,720) 50,365 (441) |
(11,163) 56,443 (1,076) |
| 44,204 | 44,204 |
Payments to directors of the entity, associates of the directors, related entities of the entity and associates of the related entities
| 1.23 1.24 |
Aggregate amount of payments to the parties included in item 1.2 Aggregate amount of loans to the parties included in item 1.10 |
Current quarter $A'000 |
|---|---|---|
| 205 | ||
| Nil | ||
| 1.25 | Explanation necessaryfor an understandingof the transactions | |
| Item 1.7 – represents costs associated with business development activities. Item 1.8 (a) – represents the costs associated with the acquisition of the Cameron Project from Coventry Resources Inc. Item 1.8 (b) – represents the cost of acquiring a 24% interest in GeoCrystal Limited. During April 2014, the Company exercised 2,100,000 options at an exercise price of 20 cents ($420,000) held in GeoCrystal Limited and subscribed for an additional 4.25 million shares at an issue price of 20 cents ($850,000), with 4.25 million free attaching options. Each attaching option is exercisable at 25 cents on or before 31 March 2016. Item 1.19 – represents costs associated with the on-market share buyback. The Company acquired 9,021,260 shares during the quarter, for a total of $1,401,553 (including brokerage). Total shares acquired to 30 June 2014 is 10,036,591 for a total cost of $1,549,243. Item 1.23 – Amounts paid to related parties include remuneration, directors’ fees, consulting fees and reimbursements of out of pocket expenses to directors. |
Non-cash financing and investing activities
- 2.1 Details of financing and investing transactions which have had a material effect on consolidated assets and liabilities but did not involve cash flows
Nil
- 2.2 Details of outlays made by other entities to establish or increase their share in projects in which the reporting entity has an interest
Nil
Financing facilities available
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the position.
| 3.1 Loan facilities 3.2 Credit standby arrangements |
Amount available $A’000 |
Amount used $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| Nil | Nil | |
| Nil | Nil |
Estimated cash outflows for next quarter
| 4.1 Exploration and evaluation 4.2 Development 4.3 Production 4.4 Administration |
$A’000 |
|---|---|
| (2,300) | |
| - | |
| - | |
| (434) | |
| Total | (2,734) |
Reconciliation of cash
| Reconciliation of cash at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts is as follows. |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Previous quarter $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 Cash on hand and at bank 5.2 Deposits at call 5.3 Bank overdraft 5.4 Other (provide details) |
22,959 | 28,726 |
| 21,245 | 21,639 | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| Total: cash at end of quarter(item 1.22) | 44,204 | 50,365 |
Changes in interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements
| 6.1 Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements relinquished, reduced or lapsed 6.2 Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased |
Tenement reference and location |
Nature of interest (note (2)) |
Interest at beginning of quarter |
Interest at end of quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia: Marla: EL4655 EL4656 EL4657 EL4658 EL4659 EL4660 EL4661 EL5390 Oodnadatta: EL4679 EL4682 EL4683 EL4684 EL4686 EL4687 EL4688 EL4959 EL5144 Canada: Rainy River: 4268070 4268071 4264665 4264664 |
0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% 0% - earning up to 70% Owned Owned Owned Owned |
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% |
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% |
|
| Canada: Cameron Gold Project: Mining lease - 108466 |
80% interest | 80%. | Owned - 100% |
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
| Total number | Number quoted | Issue price per security (see note3) (cents) |
Amount paid up per security (see note3) (cents) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.1 Preference +securities (description) |
Nil | Nil | N/A | N/A |
| 7.2 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through returns of capital, buy- backs, redemptions |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.3 +Ordinary securities 7.4 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through returns of capital, buy- backs |
287,491,719 | 287,491,719 | N/A | N/A |
| - (9,021,260) |
- (9,021,260) |
Nil N/A |
N/A ($1,396,944) |
|
| 7.5 +Convertible debt securities (description) 7.6 Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through securities matured, converted |
Nil | Nil | N/A | N/A |
| Nil Nil |
Nil Nil |
N/A N/A |
N/A N/A |
|
| 7.7 Options (description and conversion factor) Performance Rights 7.8 Issued during quarter Options Performance Rights 7.9 Exercised during quarter Options Performance Rights 7.10 Expired during quarter Options |
750,000 100,000 1,050,000 |
Nil Nil Nil |
Exercise price 0.35 0.35 0.30 |
Expiry date 14 September 2014 30 November 2014 30 June 2016 |
| 2,754,149 | Nil | Nil | 30 June 2016 | |
| Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
| Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
| Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
| Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | |
| 187,500 187,500 375,000 |
0.45 0.55 0.65 |
30 April 2014 30 April 2014 30 April 2014 |
| Performance Rights |
Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.11 Debentures (totals only) |
Nil | Nil | ||
| 7.12 Unsecured notes(totals only) |
Nil | Nil |
Compliance statement
-
1 This statement has been prepared under accounting policies which comply with accounting standards as defined in the Corporations Act or other standards acceptable to ASX (see note 5).
-
2 This statement does give a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Sign here: Date: 30 July 2014 (Company secretary) Print name: Leanne Stevens
Notes
-
1 The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity wanting to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes attached to this report.
-
2 The “Nature of interest” (items 6.1 and 6.2) includes options in respect of interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired, exercised or lapsed during the reporting period. If the entity is involved in a joint venture agreement and there are conditions precedent which will change its percentage interest in a mining tenement or petroleum tenement, it should disclose the change of percentage interest and conditions precedent in the list required for items 6.1 and 6.2.
-
3 Issued and quoted securities The issue price and amount paid up is not required in items 7.1 and 7.3 for fully paid securities .
-
4 The definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report.
-
5 Accounting Standards ASX will accept, for example, the use of International Financial Reporting Standards for foreign entities. If the standards used do not address a topic, the Australian standard on that topic (if any) must be complied with.
== == ==