AI assistant
CHALICE MINING LIMITED — Annual Report 2024
Sep 25, 2024
64649_rns_2024-09-25_b4d21b3f-f85c-43ab-914d-973fc37818fa.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [30 x 54] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [48 x 30] intentionally omitted <==
2024 ANNUAL REPORT Chalice Mining Limited
==> picture [562 x 517] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [564 x 617] intentionally omitted <==
Acknowledgement of Country
Chalice acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land on which we work. We recognise their continuing connection to land, waters and culture.
We pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.
2 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Contents
| Overview | |
|---|---|
| FY2024 Highlights | 4 |
| Letter from the MD & CEO and Chair | 6 |
| Our Leadership | 9 |
| Introduction | 11 |
| The Chalice Way | 12 |
| Our Strategy | 13 |
| Critical and Strategic Minerals | 14 |
| Operating & Financial Review | 16 |
| Gonneville PGE-Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Project | 17 |
| Generative Exploration and Strategic Investments | 22 |
| Financial Performance | 26 |
| Mineral Resource Statement | 27 |
| Competent Persons’ Statements | 30 |
| Tenement Schedule | 32 |
| Sustainability Report | 34 |
| Letter from the Chair of the Risk and Sustainability Committee | 35 |
| Our Approach to Sustainability | 36 |
| Strong Environmental Stewardship |
41 |
| Manage Climate Change Risks | 45 |
| Create Value for Stakeholders | 52 |
| Cultural Heritage and Traditional Owner Engagement | 56 |
| Health and Safety in the Workforce | 57 |
| People and Culture | 59 |
| Operating Responsibly | 60 |
| Directors’ Report | 66 |
| Remuneration Report | 72 |
| Auditor’s Independence Declaration | 100 |
| Financial Statements | 101 |
| Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income | 102 |
| Consolidated Statement of Financial Position | 103 |
| Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity | 104 |
| Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow | 105 |
| Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | 107 |
| Consolidated Entity Disclosure Statement | 128 |
| Directors’ Declaration | 129 |
| Independent Auditor’s Report | 130 |
| Further Information | 134 |
| ASX Additional Information | 135 |
| Company Directory | 138 |
| 3
==> picture [522 x 126] intentionally omitted <==
FY2024 Highlights
Gonneville PGE-Ni-Cu-Co Project
Exploration and Evaluation
Community Engagement
Completed a Scoping Study for the Project assessing bulk open-pit development options – outlining a new long-life, low-cost, low-carbon critical and strategic minerals project in Western Australia.
Completed a second Local Voices Community Survey to understand how local communities feel about key issues over time – 75% of respondents have a moderate to very high level of support for the Gonneville Project.
Commenced the Pre-Feasibility Study to investigate the optimal project development pathway, including starter case options to suit a range of commodity price environments.
Signing of a landmark Heads of Agreement (HOA) with the Shire of Toodyay for the future establishment of the Chalice Mining Community Fund.
Executed a strategic non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Mitsubishi Corporation to advance the development of Gonneville and collaborate on the Project’s technical, financing, marketing and offtake aspects.
Delivered an upgrade to the Gonneville Mineral Resource Estimate (Resource) to suit selective open-pit and underground mining:
660Mt @ 0.79g/t 3E PGE, 0.15% Ni, 0.083% Cu, 0.015% Co, containing[1] :
| 17Moz 3E 960kt Ni 540kt Cu |
96kt Co |
|---|---|
| Including a higher-grade sulphide resource: | |
| 59Mt @ 2.0g/t 3E PGE, 0.20% Ni, 0.21% Cu, 0.019% Co |
Regulatory Approvals
Referred the Gonneville Project to State and Commonwealth environmental regulatory authorities for environmental assessment and approval in March 2024.
Scoping and assessment of power and water infrastructure corridor options for the Gonneville Project.
Third year of comprehensive baseline environmental surveys conducted for the Gonneville Project, including groundwater, surface water, flora, fauna and dieback.
in funding awarded to local initiatives
~$138,000
through the Chalice Community Investment Program for the Gonneville Project, focussed on the Shires of Toodyay, Chittering and Northam.
$4.3 million
in local spend by Chalice
in the Shires surrounding the Gonneville Project since the discovery.
Traditional Owners continued to undertake cultural heritage monitoring to ensure appropriate management of cultural heritage values.
Whadjuk Traditional Owners conducted ethnographic and archaeological cultural heritage surveys across all Chaliceowned farmlands, including the Gonneville Project site - >100 Traditional Owners have participated in this work since 2021.
Exploration – West Yilgarn Province
Defined >40 untested greenfield Ni-Cu-PGE and Cu-Au targets across the West Yilgarn Province from reconnaissance work over the ~10,000km[2] licence holding.
Mineral Resource Estimates as at 23 April 2024 as per ASX announcement “Gonneville Resource Remodeled to Support Selective Mining” For tonnes and grade by confidence category, refer to the Mineral Resource Statement within this Annual Report.
4 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
-
6 drill-ready, high-priority greenfield targets – with further delineation and refinement of targets ongoing.
-
12,000m reconnaissance drilling program completed across the Julimar Exploration Project, confirming a ~12km trend at Hartog-Dampier containing Gonneville-like mineralised ultramafic intrusive geology.
-
Successful implementation of low-impact exploration drilling techniques in vegetated areas, demonstrating industryleading practice since 2022.
Signed an additional earn-in agreement over third-party licence holdings in the West Yilgarn, further expanding Chalice’s dominant position in this exciting new mineral province.
Corporate
-
$111 million in cash and investments at end of FY2024, ensuring Chalice is well-funded to progress the Gonneville Pre-Feasibility Study and other development activities in FY2025.
-
Implemented disciplined reductions in expenditures and overheads to reflect extremely weak commodity market conditions.
Zero significant environmental incidents in FY2024.
-
Zero lost-time injuries, fatalities or high potential safety events.
-
Improved in-field safety systems to increase connectivity, accountability and reliability of information for teams working remotely.
-
$7.7 million strategic investment in West Arunta focused explorer Encounter Resources Limited (ASX: ENR).
==> picture [548 x 385] intentionally omitted <==
| 5
Letter from the Managing Director & CEO and Chair
Dear Shareholders,
On behalf of the Chalice Board of Directors, we are pleased to present our 2024 Annual Report.
Despite the challenges of a difficult year for the Company and shareholders – with significant macro-economic headwinds seeing sharp falls in the prices of both palladium and nickel over the course of the year – we have maintained focus on optimising the world-class Gonneville Project (Project) and adding value through exploration of the exciting West Yilgarn Province.
In light of the metals price environment, in August 2024, the Company made targeted reductions to corporate overheads and project expenditures. The reductions ensure we remain in a strong financial position to advance the Project and continue to undertake targeted valueadd exploration activities.
The supply of critical and strategic minerals from western sources continues to decline, accentuated by short-term price volatility. Our 100%-owned Gonneville Platinum Group Element-Nickel-Copper-Cobalt (PGE-Ni-Cu-Co) Project remains one of the leading future sources of these minerals in the western world.
Major governments have also continued their commitment to accelerate the development of critical and strategic metals projects, and Gonneville’s location in one of the world’s most stable and mining-friendly jurisdictions puts us in a strong position to benefit from this support.
The spot price for palladium remains deep in the industry cost curve, with a significant portion of palladium producers operating at a loss. As such, we expect cuts to production in the near term, in the absence of a price recovery.
As the economic impacts of unsustainably low spot prices play out, we believe the palladium price should return to more sustainable levels.
Russia and South Africa account for ~80% of global primary production and western economies remain exposed to heightened supply and geopolitical risks. Gonneville is in a very good position in this context as the only palladium project of scale in the western world.
==> picture [522 x 307] intentionally omitted <==
6 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Executing our strategy
Since the initial Gonneville discovery by Chalice’s exploration team in 2020, our strategy has been to:
-
Understand the full extent of the Julimar Complex mineral system.
-
Define and de-risk the optimal development pathway for Gonneville.
-
Secure strategic partners for the development, funding our strategy whilst maintaining control and optionality.
-
Unlock the exploration potential of the surrounding West Yilgarn Province.
In FY2024 we delivered positive progress on these objectives. We successfully delineated the extent of the Julimar Complex, over ~12km of strike length from the Gonneville Resource at the southern end, to the Dampier Prospect at the northern end. The mineral system is extensive and highly prospective for further discovery.
We completed a Scoping Study in August 2023 on bulk open-pit development scenarios for Gonneville. While the Study demonstrated the potential for Gonneville to become a long life, low-cost, low-carbon critical and strategic minerals mine, it was clear that the larger bulk open-pit scenarios presented required higher commodity prices, or improvements in metallurgical recoveries to be incentivised.
The negative reaction to the Scoping Study was exacerbated by a rapidly deteriorating metals price environment. Chalice commenced work on a staged, high-grade development pathway as part of a PreFeasibility Study, with the aim of enhancing resilience in lower commodity price environments. Our work on the PreFeasibility Study was the major focus throughout the year, and we continue to optimise the project development strategy.
It is important to note that, despite short-term volatility in commodity markets, we remain convinced that the scale and unique metals mix make Gonneville a genuine tier-1 Resource. This provides Chalice with strong optionality and significant leverage to rising metal prices as the markets for these highly strategic commodities return to more sustainable levels. We will continue to progress and de-risk the project to put ourselves in the best possible position to capitalise on these rising prices when commodity markets recover from their cyclical lows.
Our fourth Mineral Resource Estimate (Resource) upgrade for Gonneville was released in April 2024 and was completed with a view to providing more granularity and detail over the high-grade areas of the Resource. The upgrade delivered a 25% increase in PGE grade and a 17% increase in copper grade across the high-grade
==> picture [232 x 95] intentionally omitted <==
Resource, relative to the previous high-grade estimate delivered in March 2023.
Importantly, 61% of the Resource is now classified in the higher confidence Measured and Indicated categories, with the high-grade Resource now being used as the basis for the evaluation of the initial phase of development in Pre-Feasibility Study.
On the regulatory front, our referral of the Gonneville Project to the State and Commonwealth environmental regulatory authorities for environmental assessment during the year marked a major milestone and an important step towards progressing the project to become a reliable source of critical and strategic minerals.
The strategic partnering process that progressed during the year, culminated in the signing of a strategic non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Mitsubishi Corporation in July 2024. We view this as the first step of a foundational and long-term relationship with a tier-1 strategic partner.
Mitsubishi Corporation is one of Japan’s largest conglomerates and a leading global natural resources investor, with a long and successful track record of partnering with mining companies to fund and develop major mining projects globally. We consider Mitsubishi an ideal strategic partner that could contribute significantly to the scoping, funding and development of the Gonneville Project. We are enjoying working together with Mitsubishi and have built a strong relationship that we aim to formalise into a potential binding partnership upon completion of the Pre-Feasibility Study.
Chalice remains committed to high sustainability standards in the development of the Gonneville Project, with a focus on minimising impacts to the environment, making a positive contribution to local communities, and working with Traditional Owners to ensure that cultural heritage values are understood and appropriately managed.
Chalice has a strong track-record of sound financial management, and throughout the year we made targeted reductions to expenditures while still continuing to execute our strategy.
During FY2024, operating cash outflows were reduced by ~26 % compared with the previous year. Subsequent to the end of FY2024, we announced further targeted reductions in corporate overheads and project expenditures to ensure Chalice’s strong cash balance is preserved. The Company
2 Aggregate of palladium, platinum and gold.
| 7
ended the financial year with $111 million in cash and investments with upcoming expenditure rates targeted to reduce from $2.4 million per month down to $1 million per month. This resulted in the Board of Directors reducing from six to four, following the resignations of Linda Kenyon and Jo Gaines. The Company extends its sincere thanks to Linda and Jo for their significant contributions over several years and wishes them the very best in the future.
We would also like to acknowledge the dedicated efforts of Morgan Ball, who stepped down from the Board after eight years of service to the Company.
Chalice has an exceptionally strong financial position which ensures we can execute our strategy with capital discipline and flexibility, and be well placed when commodity prices recover to more sustainable levels.
Delivering growth through exploration
Chalice has an outstanding track record of delivering shareholder returns through exploration and discovery in frontier geological provinces. We continue to hunt for the next big discovery, with a key focus on our large landholding in Western Australia’s West Yilgarn Province.
Chalice has a truly unique strategic advantage, with a largely 100%-owned licence holding extending over more than 10,000km[2] , and a detailed understanding of the Gonneville mineral system and its distinct geochemical ‘fingerprint’.
Systematic exploration programs continue, with a focus on major new greenfield copper-gold and magmatic nickel-copper-PGE discoveries. Chalice’s exploration team has defined an exciting pipeline for FY2025, with >40 untested greenfield targets identified across the West Yilgarn Province, six of which are at drill-ready status.
The outlook for Chalice
Chalice remains in a strong financial position with $111 million in cash and investments at the end of FY2024.
As such, we are well-funded to continue Gonneville development studies, regulatory approvals and exploration of the West Yilgarn Province. We also have an ideal “first choice” partner in Mitsubishi to help advise on the optimal marketing and financing solutions for the Project. We look forward to discussing a formal binding partnership with Mitsubishi in FY2025.
==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
“Chalice has an exceptionally strong financial position which ensures we can execute our strategy with capital discipline and flexibility, and be well placed when commodity prices recover to more sustainable levels.”
West Yilgarn Province, are highly sought-after and remain vital inputs for urbanisation and decarbonisation. New large-scale, western deposits of these metals are especially sought after.
In closing, we would like to acknowledge the efforts of the entire Chalice team – fellow directors and management as well as our staff and contractors – who have gone above and beyond over the course of the year. We have an extraordinary, hard-working team that share a deep commitment to achieving our goals and we would like to sincerely thank everyone for their efforts.
To all our shareholders and stakeholders – a sincere thankyou for your contribution, support and ongoing loyalty. While our share price remains subject to prevailing macroeconomic factors and market conditions, there are many compelling catalysts in the year ahead that give us cause for excitement and optimism.
We look forward to delivering on this opportunity in FY2025 and in the years ahead.
Yours sincerely,
The commodities that we are seeking to produce from our world-class Gonneville Project, and exploring for in the
Alex Dorsch, Managing Director & CEO and Derek La Ferla, Non-executive Chair
8 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Our Leadership
Board of Directors
Derek La Ferla
Independent Non-Executive Chair
Qualifications: B.Arts, B.Juris, B.Law, FAICD
Appointed 1 October 2021 and Chair on 24 November 2021
Mr La Ferla is a highly regarded ASX-200 chair and company director, with an extensive national network in business, capital markets, government and industry, backed by over 30 years of experience as a corporate lawyer.
Derek has a wide range of board experience, including as former Chair of Sandfire Resources Limited (ASX: SFR), where he was instrumental throughout the feasibility, development and operational phases of the major DeGrussa Project. Derek is currently the Chair of Green Peak Energy Pty Ltd, Icon Engineering Pty Ltd and Foodbank WA, and was formerly the Chair of Poseidon Nickel Limited (ASX: POS).
Alex Dorsch
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Qualifications: B.Eng (Hons), B.Fin
Appointed 13 November 2018
Mr Dorsch has led Chalice since late 2018 and has steered the Company from junior explorer through to an ASX300 listed explorer-developer. He has led the Company through the transformational growth period following the Gonneville discovery and into the feasibility and permitting stage of the Project. Alex was recognised as the ‘Emerging Leader of the Year’ by MiningNews and ‘CEO of the Year’ by Kitco in 2020. He also received the Young Mining Professionals ‘Peter Munk Award’ in 2022.
Alex has diverse experience in leadership roles across the resources sector, as a management consultant, engineer, project manager and corporate advisor. Prior roles included a Specialist Consultant with McKinsey & Company. He commenced his engineering career with resources giant BHP, and then spent over six years as an engineer in oil and gas exploration. He is currently a NonExecutive Director for Falcon Metals Limited (ASX: FAL).
Garret Dixon
Independent Non-Executive Director
Qualifications: B.Eng (Hons), MBA
Appointed 21 August 2020
Stephen McIntosh
Independent Non-Executive Director
Qualifications: B.Sc, MSc (Hons)
Appointed 20 February 2021
Mr Dixon has extensive experience in the resources and mining contracting sectors in Australia and overseas. His work in both private and ASX-listed companies spans more than three decades, having worked in senior executive roles for major mine owners, mine operators and contractors.
Garret recently held the position of Executive VP Alcoa & President Bauxite, where he was responsible for the global bauxite mining business for the NYSE-listed Alcoa Corporation.
His career also includes the roles of Executive General Manager at civil construction and contract mining group Henry Walker Eltin Ltd and Managing Director of ASX-listed Gindalbie Metals Ltd (ASX: GBG).
Mr McIntosh is an internationally recognised figure in the mining industry, with a global career spanning over 37 years.
Most recently, he was a member of the Executive Committee for Rio Tinto (ASX: RIO) and held the position of Group Executive, Growth & Innovation and Health, Safety, Environment & Security. Prior to this, Stephen was Rio Tinto’s global Head of Exploration.
Stephen has been involved in the discovery, evaluation and development of multiple projects across a diverse range of commodities globally. He currently serves on the board of the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) and is Chair of Datarock Holdings Pty Ltd, which is a machine learning/AI start-up focussed on the resources sector.
Morgan Ball resigned from the Chalice Board on 31 March 2024. Jo Gaines and Linda Kenyon resigned from the Chalice Board on 31 August 2024. Refer to the Directors’ Report for further information.
| 9
==> picture [547 x 418] intentionally omitted <==
Executive Management
Mike Nelson
General Manager - Project Development
Qualifications: B.Sc (Hons), MAppFin, GradDipMgt
Mr Nelson is a highly experienced mining executive and project director, with over 30 years’ experience in operational and project leadership.
Mike has played pivotal roles in major projects, including Reko Diq, a copper-gold project operated by Barrick Gold Corporation and Quebrada Blanca Phase II, a copper project operated by Teck Resources.
His metallurgy, engineering and project management expertise in large-scale precious and base metals operations and his proven ability to deliver significant projects make him uniquely qualified to lead the Gonneville Project.
Mike holds a Bachelor of Science (Hons) from the University of Western Australia, Master of Applied Finance from KAPLAN and Post Graduate Diploma in Management from Deakin University. Mike joined Chalice in February 2023.
Chris MacKinnon Chief Financial Officer
Qualifications: LLB, CPA, GradDipAppFin
Mr MacKinnon is a qualified accountant and lawyer with over 15 years of professional and corporate experience in the energy and resources industry.
Chris has previously worked in corporate finance and legal roles in Carnarvon Petroleum and Australis Oil and Gas. Prior to that, he was an Associate Director at boutique investment bank, Miro Advisors, and was in legal private practice in a major national law firm.
Chris is a Certified Practising Accountant who holds a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Western Australia and a Diploma of Applied Finance from KAPLAN. Chris joined Chalice in July 2020, and previously held the role of Business Development and Legal Manager until March 2023.
10 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Introduction
Company Overview
Chalice made a major greenfield discovery in early 2020 at the Gonneville Project in Western Australia. The transformational discovery hosts a rare mix of critical and strategic minerals required for decarbonisation and urbanisation, including palladium, platinum, nickel, copper and cobalt.
Gonneville has a tier-1 scale Mineral Resource Estimate (Resource) containing approximately 17 million ounces of platinum group elements (PGEs), 960 thousand tonnes of nickel, 540 thousand tonnes of copper and 96 thousand tonnes of cobalt – making it the largest PGE discovery in Australian history, and one of the largest recent nickel sulphide discoveries worldwide.
Chalice is advancing this world-class critical and strategic minerals resource towards development. A Scoping Study was released in August 2023 on bulk open-pit development options, and the Company is now progressing a Pre-Feasibility Study on a staged high-
grade development option targeted for completion in mid-CY2025.
The Scoping Study outlined a potential new long-life, low-cost, critical and strategic minerals mine in Western Australia. The focus of the Pre-Feasibility is to establish a phased development approach, with a more selective mining sequence and a simpler initial process flowsheet. Chalice has also entered into a strategic nonbinding Memorandum of Understanding with Mitsubishi Corporation for collaboration on the technical, marketing and funding aspects of the Project.
Chalice also has an unrivalled >10,000km[2] licence holding in the exciting frontier region of the West Yilgarn Province. This licence holding was largely staked immediately after the Gonneville discovery, putting Chalice in the highly advantageous ‘first mover’ position to pursue further discoveries. We continue to actively explore the province for the next transformational magmatic sulphide or orogenic gold-copper discovery.
==> picture [229 x 187] intentionally omitted <==
Who we are
-
Globally recognised team with a track record of finding and developing mines
-
Commercially experienced group with a focus on shareholder returns
-
High-performance, results-driven and values-based company culture
Our Portfolio
Gonneville PGE-Ni-Cu-Co Project
Chalice is advancing a new world-class critical and strategic minerals resource in Western Australia towards development
West Yilgarn Province
Chalice is the first-mover in one of the most exciting frontier provinces worldwide
==> picture [247 x 167] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Narryer Project
WESTERN
AUSTRALIA
Barrabarra Project
Julimar Project
Kings Project
Northam JV Project
South-West Project
----- End of picture text -----
| 11
The Chalice Way
==> picture [485 x 355] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Purpose To find and develop world-class critical minerals projects
Aspiration To create a world-class critical minerals producer
Values Integrity Ownership
Do the right thing Think like an owner
Alignment Urgency
If Chalice succeeds, Act today, not
we all succeed tomorrow
Advancement
Improve every day
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [522 x 277] intentionally omitted <==
12 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Our Strategy
01 01
Generate New Discoveries
Conceptualise, define and prioritise new targets for potential major discoveries.
Cultivate our ‘discovery DNA’ and leverage our intellectual property.
02 02
Define New Resources
Make new major discoveries and turn them into material Resources and Reserves.
Define and characterise the mineral systems.
03 03
De-risk Development
Define project scope and advance regulatory approvals, maximising value and optionality whilst minimising risk.
Form strategic partnership(s) and secure offtake customers for our products.
04
Develop our Business and Market
Understand and influence the market for Chalice’s basket of commodities.
Enhance and manage our portfolio of projects to maximise value for shareholders.
05
Fund the Strategy
Maintain financial flexibility and optionality to fund our strategy.
Strengthen our controls and processes.
06
Focus on People and Stakeholders
Build our sustainability brand, reputation and social licence.
Attract and retain the best people. Execute safely.
| 13
Critical and Strate ic Minerals g
Critical and strategic minerals are required to decarbonise the global economy and address the global challenge of climate change. As the world’s population continues to urbanise, this further increases demand for these metals. They are essential to modern life, however sustainable new sources of these metals in the world are becoming increasingly rare.
Large deposits of these metals are becoming increasingly difficult to find, and the Gonneville Resource is one of the largest and most significant discoveries in the western world in recent history.
The Gonneville Project has the potential to provide significant quantities of these metals, such as palladium, nickel, copper and cobalt, which are used in technologies like electric and hybrid vehicles, wind and solar energy, energy storage and green hydrogen.
The key demand driver of palladium is hybrid and internal combustion engine vehicles. Palladium is the key ingredient in the catalytic converters that are required to reduce harmful emissions from these vehicles. With roughly 85% of demand coming from the automotive industry, other uses for palladium include hydrogenation, jewellery and electronics.
Applications and Uses
The need to decarbonise and urbanise the global economy will underpin long-term demand for the critical and strategic minerals at Gonneville.
==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
46 106.42
Pd
Palladium
----- End of picture text -----
Palladium
Extremely rare, precious metal with highly versatile catalytic properties, used in emissions reduction technologies such as catalytic converters and in hydrogen electrolysers.
- ~9Moz p.a.[3] Pd market in prolonged deficit, supply dominated by Russia and South Africa.
==> picture [55 x 108] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
28 58.693
Ni
Nickel
27 58.933
Co
Cobalt
----- End of picture text -----
Nickel and Cobalt
Key industrial and electrification metals with unique chemical properties.
Nickel supply dominated by carbon intensive, high environmental impact laterite sources, significant deficit forecast.
Cobalt supply dominated by Democratic Republic of Congo with humanitarian challenges.
==> picture [54 x 54] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
29 63.546
Cu
Copper
----- End of picture text -----
Copper
Key industrial and electrification metal with high conductivity.
Market, with severe lack of recent large-scale discoveries resulting in a significant deficit forecast[4] .
-
3 SFA Oxford April 2024
-
4 International Energy Agency
14 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Gonneville is positioned to become a strategic asset for Australia.
Gonneville is the first major PGE discovery in Australia and one of the few recent large-scale magmatic sulphide discoveries in the western world.
Palladium, platinum, nickel and cobalt are classified as ‘critical minerals’ by most western governments; the case is also growing for copper.
-
The western world is extremely reliant on Russian and South African palladium supply (~80% of global supply).
-
Gonneville is located in one of the world’s most stable and mining-friendly jurisdictions with a commitment to sustainable development.
-
Western Governments are demonstrating their commitment to accelerate strategically significant projects and strengthen internal critical mineral security and supply chains[5] .
-
The Gonneville Project aligns with the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).
==> picture [17 x 17] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [200 x 208] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [153 x 185] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Gonneville
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [17 x 17] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [17 x 17] intentionally omitted <==
Russia and South Africa are the major producers of palladium...
==> picture [17 x 17] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [17 x 17] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [82 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
...while Indonesia
and China are the
largest suppliers of
finished nickel product
----- End of picture text -----
Global Palladium Primary Supply Market Share (2023)[6]
==> picture [419 x 110] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
41%
36%
13%
6%
3%
Russia South Africa North America Zimbabwe Rest of World
----- End of picture text -----
- 5 2023-2030 ‘Critical Minerals Strategy’ Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, Australian Government, June 2023 6 AME Research
| 15
==> picture [318 x 758] intentionally omitted <==
16 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Gonneville PGE-Nickel-CopperCobalt Project
| Location | ~70km NE of Perth, Western Australia |
|---|---|
| Development stage | Resource; Pre-Feasibility and Permitting |
| Acquired ownership | Exploration licences staked in 2018 |
| Ownership | 100% |
Company Overview
The 100%-owned Gonneville Platinum Group ElementNickel-Copper-Cobalt (PGE-Ni-Cu-Co) Project (Gonneville or the Project) is a pre-development project located on Chalice-owned farmland in Western Australia. The Project is centred on the Gonneville Resource – a significant greenfield mineral discovery made by Chalice’s geologists in early 2020.
Gonneville has a tier-1 scale Mineral Resource Estimate (Resource) containing approximately 17 million ounces of platinum group elements (PGEs), 960 thousand tonnes of nickel, 540 thousand tonnes of copper and 96 thousand tonnes of cobalt – making it the largest PGE discovery in Australian history, and one of the largest recent nickel sulphide discoveries worldwide.
Chalice is advancing this world-class critical and strategic minerals resource towards development. A Scoping Study was released in August 2023 on bulk open-pit development options, and the Company is now progressing a Pre-Feasibility Study on a staged development option targeted for completion in mid-CY2025.
The Scoping Study outlined a new long-life, low-cost, critical and strategic minerals mine in Western Australia. The focus of the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) is to establish a phased development approach, with a more selective mining sequence and a simpler initial process flowsheet.
In July 2024, Chalice entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Mitsubishi Corporation to work together during the ongoing PFS. The MOU establishes a general framework for collaboration on technical, financing, marketing and offtake aspects of the Project with the intent to investigate a binding partnership at the completion of the PFS.
The permitting process was also progressed during the year resulting in formal environmental referral to the State and Federal environmental regulatory authorities in March 2024.
Chalice recognises the need to develop the Gonneville Project in a sustainable and responsible manner, with a commitment to effective environmental, social and cultural heritage management.
Location
The Gonneville Project is located on Chalice-owned farmland ~70km north-east of Perth, Western Australia (Figure 1). Chalice owns ~26km[2] of farmland surrounding the Project area.
Being proximal to Perth, the region has excellent nearby infrastructure including high-voltage power, rail, sealed highways and deep-water ports, plus access to a significant highly skilled workforce.
==> picture [225 x 280] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1. Location of the Gonneville Project.
| 17
Geology & Exploration
The Resource is located at the southern end of a >12km long ultramafic-mafic intrusive belt, the Julimar Complex. Magmatic sulphide mineralisation has been confirmed over the entire length of the intrusive belt, making it a globally significant scale mineral system.
The Gonneville Intrusion has a rare chonolith-like geometry, which is similar to other major mafic-ultramafic orthomagmatic systems worldwide that host some of the world’s largest nickel copper+/-PGE deposits, including Norilsk-Talnakh and Jinchuan[7] .
The Resource has been drilled to ~1,200m below surface and is open at depth. Primary PGE-Ni-Cu-Co sulphide mineralisation occurs principally within the ultramafic domains of the Gonneville Intrusion and to a lesser extent in gabbro subunits. Mineralisation occurs as a series of sub-parallel zones, typically 5m to 40m wide, that occur within broader intervals (100m to 150m wide) of weakly disseminated sulphides.
Resource
The Mineral Resource Estimate (Resource) was updated in April 2024. The updated Resource increased by ~18% (from March 2023) after incorporating 15 new step-out drill holes. Updated Resource modelling work focused on re-interpreting high-grade sulphide zones within the Resource at a much more granular level, to allow the investigation of selective open-pit and underground mining methods. This more granular model will be used as the basis to define a smaller, more selective starter case project being evaluated in the PFS.
Gonneville Project Mineral Resource Estimate – April 2024[8] 660Mt @ 0.79g/t Pd+Pt+Au (3E PGE), 0.15% Ni, 0.083% Cu, 0.015% Co Containing 17Moz 3E PGE, 960kt Ni, 540kt Cu and 96kt Co Including a higher-grade sulphide component of the Resource of:
59Mt @ 2.0g/t 3E PGE, 0.20% Ni, 0.21% Cu, 0.019% Co
Containing 3.8Moz 3E PGE, 120kt Ni, 120kt Cu, 11kt Co
As part of the updated MRE, high-grade palladium, nickel and copper zones were modelled separately to better define the mineralogical domain in comparison to previous Resource models that assumed bulk openpit mining approaches only (with significantly larger block sizes).
56 additional drill holes were incorporated, both to increase confidence in the Resource as well as to extend the Resource down-dip to a depth of ~1,100m.
The Resource includes a mix of oxide, transitional and fresh mineralisation. The sulphide mineralisation in-pit is reported at two different Net Smelter Return (NSR) cut-offs, one to reflect the initial development focus on a high-grade, selective mining starter case, and a lower cut-off to reflect a future expansion into a bulk open-pit mining method.
Definition drilling is now largely complete at the Project, with Resources defined to a vertical depth of ~1,100m in the north-western extent of the deposit. The Resource remains open beyond this depth and along strike to the north.
==> picture [207 x 268] intentionally omitted <==
7 Barnes et al, 2016
8 Mineral Resource Estimates as at 23 April 2024 as per ASX announcement “Gonneville Resource Remodeled to Support Selective Mining”. For tonnes and grade by confidence category, refer to the Mineral Resource Statement within this Annual Report.
18 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Development Studies
In August 2023, Chalice completed a Scoping Study (Study) for the Gonneville Project on bulk open-pit development options, which outlined a potential new long-life, low-cost, low-carbon critical and strategic minerals mine in Western Australia.
Based on the production profile of the Study, the Project is evaluated to be in the second quartile of the current 4E PGE (Pd+Pt+Au+Rh) industry cost curve, and the lowest-cost producer of PGEs in the western world, based on 2023 all-in sustaining costs and base metal by-product credit.
==> picture [475 x 180] intentionally omitted <==
A long-life, tier-1 scale production profile provides significant leverage to critical and strategic minerals, which are in strong demand due to global decarbonisation and urbanisation trends.
Following release of the Scoping Study, Chalice commenced a Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for the Project, assessing a staged high-grade development approach, which is targeted for completion in mid-2025. The purpose of the PFS is to select a preferred development case (in terms of scope, cost and timeline) to progress into a Feasibility Study (FS) and deliver an assessment of the financial viability of the Project.
The current focus of the ongoing PFS is three-fold:
Complete detailed metallurgical testwork to determine geo-metallurgical domains, the optimal process flowsheet and refine the grade-recovery algorithms by metal for each domain.
- Assess the viability and cost of selective open-pit and underground mining methods for the initial development phase of the project (the ‘starter case’).
Define and cost key infrastructure requirements (power, water and logistics) and finalise selection of a commercial/delivery model.
The Company has estimated that the PFS will cost ~$15 million to complete, which is comfortably covered by Chalice’s cash and investments balance of $111 million at 30 June 2024.
A key lever for the PFS is to increase metal recoveries and optimise the flowsheet. Initial results from the metallurgical testwork indicate that partial oxidation/staining may be inhibiting flotation recovery, which can be mitigated somewhat with modified flotation conditions and/or acid pre-treatment. The addition of a collector reagent in milling, longer residence time and acid pre-treatment can produce favourable increases in metal recoveries (relative to baseline conditions) at constant mass pull into bulk rougher concentrate.
Several processing flowsheet options are being investigated, with the aim of maximising metallurgical recoveries while minimising costs and risk. Given the large scale of the Resource and unique characteristics of the Project, flowsheet design and optimisation are likely to
9 April 2024 SFA (Oxford) figures used for 2023 realised 4E cost curve data. Note: 1. 4E cost curve positioning assumes SFA Oxford 2023 actual by-product commodity prices of: Copper prices of: US$8,486/t, Nickel US$21,505/t, Iridium US$4,682/oz, Ruthenium US$464/oz, Chrome 42% CIF US$312/t. Chalice internal Cobalt prices of US$40,000/t have been assumed given not disclosed in SFA data. ZAR:USD exchange rate of 18.47 assumed. 2. AISC adjusted to reflect SFA Oxford 2023 actual by-product commodity prices (vs US$360/oz on August 2023 Scoping Study prices)
| 19
continue throughout the study phases, with additional flowsheet steps and capital investment alternatives continually being assessed.
Studies are investigating sequential Cu/Ni flotation plus flotation tails leaching as a smaller scale, simpler, starter process flowsheet, to produce Cu-PGE-Au and Ni-Co-PGE concentrates for sale to western smelters and a PGE-Au doré for sale to a western precious metal refinery (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Gonneville Project process flowsheet (simplified).
This approach will reduce initial pre-production capital costs, on-site sulphide processing operating costs, and technical/complexity as well as ramp-up risks, relative to the Scoping Study flowsheet.
It is envisaged that a future expansion (of throughput and/ or the process flowsheet) is likely at some point following first production. This should allow for the processing of lower-grade material (at reduced cut-off grade, or from a stockpile), where metal could be recovered to a lowgrade Ni-Co-PGE or bulk Ni-Cu-Co-PGE concentrate and then treated by a hydrometallurgical process rather
than being sold to a nickel smelter(s) as envisaged in the Scoping Study process flowsheet.
Baseline surveys of ground water, surface water, flora, fauna and dieback continued to advance as part of the long-term baseline monitoring program, designed to support engineering studies and environmental assessments.
The regulatory approval process commenced in March 2024 with referral of Gonneville to the Commonwealth and State regulatory environmental authorities.
==> picture [522 x 211] intentionally omitted <==
20 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Memorandum of Understanding
On 3 July 2024, Chalice announced it had entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Mitsubishi Corporation (Mitsubishi) in relation to Gonneville.
The MOU sets out a framework for ongoing collaboration and assistance between Chalice and Mitsubishi in relation to development of the Project, with the aim of exploring the possibility of forming a potential binding partnership following completion of the Gonneville PFS. Both parties intend to have discussions in good faith around entering into a binding partnership within 90 days of completion of the PFS, which could take the form of a joint arrangement and investment.
The MOU gives Chalice and Mitsubishi time to collaborate and align more closely on key project parameters such as determining the optimal flowsheet and product mix, which will be the primary driver of project scale, staging and development plan currently being refined through the PFS.
Mitsubishi is one of the leading natural resources investors in the mining industry, with significant long-term investments and joint ventures in tier-1 assets globally.
Mitsubishi brings a broad range of capabilities, experience and relationships, including strong connections to the Japanese Government and commercial banking groups which Mitsubishi has historically worked closely with, to facilitate low-cost funding for its joint venture projects.
Sustainability
Chalice recognises the need to develop the Gonneville Project sustainably and responsibly, with a commitment to responsible environmental, social and cultural heritage management, and contribution to local economic development.
Chalice developed the Gonneville Project Biodiversity Strategy in 2023, which sets a goal to ensure a sciencebased no net loss of species or habitat diversity as a result of our operations. An innovative program of work was completed during the year at Gonneville and surrounding properties, including a Black Cockatoo artificial hollow study and continued Chuditch radio-tracking studies. A comprehensive program of baseline environmental surveys also continued throughout FY2024, which has been underway at the Gonneville Project and regionally since 2021.
Chalice is proud to be part of the communities surrounding the Gonneville Project, and during the year we continued to engage with local communities to build respectful and collaborative relationships, with a goal of earning trust and achieving lasting social and economic benefits.
Chalice has built a strong relationship with Traditional Owners and continues work to understand the cultural values of the Gonneville Project area. Whadjuk representatives were involved in a variety of environmental studies work throughout the year, including aquatic and vertebrate fauna surveys, flora surveys and surface water monitoring, along with ethnographic and archaeological cultural heritage surveys across all Chaliceowned farmlands including the Gonneville Project site.
Achievements and Forward Plan
Refer to our Sustainability Report within this Annual Report for further details on this work.
Chalice’s multi-track value creation strategy at the Gonneville Project is to advance development studies and progress regulatory approvals for a potential mine at Gonneville (located on Chalice-owned farmland), continue exploration in the surrounding region to determine the full scale of the mineral system, and leverage the technical, financial and marketing capabilities of strategic partner(s) to enhance the value of the Project.
Gonneville discovery and birth of the new West Yilgarn PGE-NiCu Province
Significant Maiden Mineral expansion of Resource exploration Estimate at activities Gonneville (>10,000km[2] )
Completion of the Gonneville Scoping Study
Project referred for regulatory approvals
MOU signed with Mitsubishi Corporation with the intention to form binding partership
==> picture [37 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Mar-2020
----- End of picture text -----
Nov-2021
==> picture [118 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Aug-2023 Mar-2024
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [33 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Jul-2024
----- End of picture text -----
| 21
Generative Exploration and Strategic Investments
The West Yilgarn Province
Chalice has continued to advance exploration over its large-scale exploration projects located in the West Yilgarn Province (West Yilgarn or Province).
Highlighted by Chalice’s greenfield Gonneville discovery in 2020, the province is almost completely unexplored and is considered one of the most exciting new magmatic sulphide provinces globally.
Intrusion-related/orogenic gold-copper deposits (i.e. ~40Moz Boddington gold mine – owned by Newmont Corporation (ASX: NEM); and
Lithium-Caesium-Tantalum pegmatite deposits (i.e. ~2.5Mt Li Greenbushes lithium mine – owned by Tianqi Lithium Corporation / IGO Limited JV (ASX: IGO (51%) and Albemarle Corporation (NYSE: ALB) (49%).
The Province is considered one of the most exciting critical minerals provinces globally, given it is largely unexplored but is considered highly prospective for:
- Orthomagmatic Ni-Cu+/-PGE sulphide deposits (i.e. ~17Moz PGE-Ni-Cu-Co Gonneville deposit);
Chalice is systematically exploring the region primarily targeting greenfield copper and precious metals deposits. The Company’s West Yilgarn portfolio is largely 100% owned, but also includes several earn-in joint ventures (Figure 4).
==> picture [518 x 369] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Narryer Project
WESTERN
AUSTRALIA
Barrabarra Project
Julimar Project
Kings Project
Northam JV Project
South-West Project
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 4. Chalice projects in the West Yilgarn province of Western Australia.
22 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Julimar Nickel-Copper-PGE Exploration Project (100%-owned)
The Julimar Project covers an area of ~350km[2] surrounding the Gonneville Project. Reconnaissance work by Chalice since 2021 has defined 5 mineralised prospects, as well as one additional target which remains untested by drilling.
The updated Resource for Gonneville is interpreted to cover only ~2km of the Julimar Complex’s ~12km strike length. Broad-spaced drilling along the Julimar Complex has targeted the discovery of new high-grade Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide deposits, which could add considerable value to a potential mine at Gonneville (Figure 6).
==> picture [474 x 192] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6. 3D view (looking ESE) of the Julimar Complex, Gonneville Resource and soil geochemistry
On-track exploration drilling was conducted within the Julimar State Forest (JSF) including a reconnaissance aircore (AC) drilling program (373 holes for 11,970m) and five diamond (DD) holes for 2,032m, with two of these DD holes designed to provide an initial test of the Torres magnetic/soil anomalies and three DD holes to test along strike from known disseminated mineralisation at the Hooley Prospect.
A solid geology interpreted map has been compiled from current and previous DD/AC drilling, which confirms previous exploration results highlighting a ~12km HartogHooley-Dampier trend containing Gonneville-like mineralised ultramafic to mafic intrusive geology.
Chalice utilises innovative, low-impact exploration techniques in vegetated areas. Our exploration covers a small portion of the Julimar State Forest, which is strictly governed by a Conservation Management Plan – approved by the Western Australian State Government and developed in conjunction with the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions.
During the year, all drilling in the State Forest was confined to existing tracks and cleared areas, and the use of small, track-mounted diamond drill rigs and air-core rigs removed the need for any mechanised clearing of vegetation.
Yued and Whadjuk Traditional Owners, through their cultural heritage management plans, continued to lead the monitoring and protection of cultural heritage for the exploration activities in the Julimar State Forest. This
==> picture [244 x 344] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5. Julimar Complex basement geology interpretation.
| 23
included monitoring conducted by Yued and Whadjuk representatives before a drill rig was mobilised to an area. The role of the monitors is to confirm that all drilling activities are taking place within areas that do not contain any cultural heritage sites.
Kings Nickel-Copper-PGE Project
(100% owned + Bolgart earn-in to 90%)
The Kings Project covers an area of 1,450km[2] surrounding the Gonneville and Julimar Projects. Reconnaissance work by Chalice since 2021 has defined 20 targets across the project area, 15 of which remain untested by drilling.
Exploration was undertaken across 11 early-stage targets through a systematic approach comprising surface geochemical surveys (soil and rock chip geochemical sampling) and ground electromagnetic (EM) to follow-up to discrete aeromagnetic anomalies identified as potential ultramafic to mafic intrusive bodies. An outcropping zone of copper-gold mineralisation was identified at Byromanning with further work planned on this target subject to landowner consent.
A total of 50 AC holes for 2,200m were drilled to test the Faeroe Ag-Au and Sole Cr-Cu-Ni targets located ~80km north of Gonneville. No further work is planned for these targets.
A single line of reconnaissance auger soil sampling across the Finders East target, located ~30km NNE of Gonneville, has defined coincident Ni-Cr-Cu anomalism associated with a ~500m x 200m airborne magnetic anomaly interpreted as an ultramafic-mafic intrusion. This exciting target was not previously surveyed with airborne EM and a follow-up program of Fixed Loop Electromagnetic (FLEM) and infill soil geochemical sampling is planned in late CY2024 subject to obtaining statutory approvals.
Field reconnaissance at the Eclipse and Peron targets identified subcropping serpentinite-pyroxenite rocks from a ~3km long series of magnetic highs located ~3-5km east of Gonneville. No Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation was detected from surface exploration including auger soils, rock chips or Moving Loop Electromagnetic (MLEM) although the potential for mineralisation at depth is considered high.
Northam Resources NickelCopper-PGE JV Project
(Earn-in to 70%)
Chalice entered into an earn-in and joint venture with Northam Resources in October 2023 to earn up to 70% interest in a ~1,600km[2] contiguous exploration licence holding located adjacent to Chalice’s 100%-owned Kings Project. Reconnaissance work completed by Chalice
and Northam Resources from 2019 to 2024 has defined 33 targets across the project area, 18 of which remain untested by drilling.
Project-wide exploration activities commenced in late 2023, including a ~33,700-line km ultra-detailed airborne magnetic survey to complement a previously acquired HeliTem AEM survey. Prospect-scale surface geochemical surveys were undertaken in summer including field reconnaissance and geological mapping, resulting in the delineation of 28 interpreted ultramafic to mafic intrusive targets located along two subparallel trends known as the Felburg and Caro-Kann trends, extending over 25km and 10km strike lengths respectively.
A program of MLEM and FLEM surveys was completed across ten PGE-Ni-Cu targets during the year, with bedrock EM conductors identified at four targets. Highconductance EM plates were defined at the Schrodinger North and South, Howard Kelpie and Chamberlain targets (located ~50km NE of Gonneville), with these targets prioritised for drill testing later in CY2024.
1,450 auger soil geochemical samples were collected over 14 targets, with promising coincident Ni-Cr-Cu-Co-Au anomalism identified at the Kann target located ~65km NE of Gonneville. A~2,000m x 300m pathfinder geochemical anomaly is associated with subcrop after serpentinite and further exploration is planned along this ~10km trend.
A 3-hole (650m) diamond drill program was completed at the Bolgart target, which tested Airborne EM/ground EM anomalies associated with an interpreted ultramafic intrusion located close to the tectonic boundary between the South West Yilgarn and the Youanmi Terranes. A 7,000S conductor was intersected in BD001 which comprised barren pyrrhotite-dominant massive sulphides although problematic ground conditions in BD002 prevented testing of an 8,000S EM conductor located west of an interpreted ultramafic intrusion. BD003 intersected an 85m-wide weakly mineralised serpentinised harzburgite. No further work was undertaken at the Bolgart target in FY2024.
Barrabarra Nickel-CopperPGE Project
(100% owned + Koojan earn-in to 80%)
The Barrabarra Project covers an area of 4,355km[2] in the mid-west region of WA. Reconnaissance work by Chalice since 2021 has defined 12 high priority targets across the project area, 8 of which will be tested with AC drilling in CYQ4, pending harvest in the region.
Exploration during the year included an ultra-detailed aeromagnetic survey (67,600-line km/50m line spacing), Falcon AGG survey (5,700-line km/400m line spacing) and ground gravity (540 stations, 400m spacing) to assist with target definition within this poorly exposed part of the West Yilgarn Ni-Cu-PGE province.
A detailed geological structural interpretation has been
24 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
completed across the project utilising the newly acquired geophysical datasets in conjunction with >150 field geology data points.
The project-wide exploration activities have facilitated a new understanding of the bedrock geology resulting in newly recognised trends of ultramafic to mafic intrusive geology which are prospective for Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide mineralisation. In addition, the interpreted geology has identified large areas of unrecognised Archaean greenstone belts and a pervasive structural overprint, which highlights prospectivity for orogenic Au-Cu.
A second extensive phase of soil geochemistry was undertaken during the year to either extend known surface anomalism or to test new PGE-Ni-Cu, Au-Cu and Li target areas. A total of ~7,850 soil samples were collected and the results have been reviewed generating 15 new targets for follow-up exploration.
A focused soil geochemical survey undertaken at the Perenjori Target in the south-east of the project area identified a ~2km x ~300m Au-Bi-Te-Pd anomaly in lateritic soils coinciding with a prominent NW-trending aeromagnetic anomaly, interpreted as a fault. This target is planned for follow-up including infill auger geochemical sampling and drone magnetics.
A 7-hole (1,252m) RC drill program was completed to test unexplained AEM/ground EM conductors across the project area during FY2024, with only minor copper anomalism associated with sulphide mineralisation in mafic intrusive rock types.
The Barrabarra Project includes an earn-in and joint venture on the Koojan Project (E70/5560-5561) with Koojan Exploration Pty Ltd (Chalice earning up to 80% interest).
Narryer Nickel-Copper-PGE Exploration Project
(100% owned + Mt Narryer earn-in to 75%)
The Narryer Project covers an area of 284km[2] in the Gascoyne region of WA, with an additional 114km2 pending grant. Reconnaissance work by Chalice since 2021 has defined 6 high priority targets across the project area, all of which remain untested by drilling.
Regional surface geochemical programs were conducted across the project during the year comprising ~2,890 samples on 100% owned tenements and ~1,120 samples on E09/2704 (Platina earn-in & Mt Narryer JV).
The presence of transported cover in some target areas of the project necessitated an exploration approach utilising regional geophysical surveys including airborne magnetics (2,160-line km) and ground gravity surveying (3,870 stations, 400m spacing) to indirectly detect prospective host rocks. An interpreted geology map compiled from geophysical interpretation and geological reconnaissance has identified prospective ultramafic to mafic intrusives
aligned along two major trends.
The Narryer Project includes an earn-in and joint venture on the Mt Narryer Project (E09/2704) with Platina Resources Ltd (Chalice earning up to 75% interest).
South West Nickel-CopperPGE Project
(100% owned + Venture earn-in to 70%)
The South West Project covers an area of ~700km[2] near Yornup within the highly prospective West Yilgarn NiCu-PGE Province. The Project is centred on a ‘Julimar Complex lookalike’, the Thor Ni-Cu-PGE Target – a ~20km long interpreted mafic-ultramafic complex with a strong magnetic signature and historical massive sulphide occurrences.
Exploration activities during the year pivoted to lithiumcaesium-tantalum (LCT) pegmatite targets and six lowlevel Li+pathfinder targets were tested with auger soil geochemistry. No significant LCT anomalism was identified and no further work is planned for these targets.
The broader tenement package was explored through an initial phase of regional laterite geochemistry (~5km[2] ) and an infill program (76 infill samples to ~2km[2] ) which defined a ~2.5km x 1km coincident Sn-Ta anomaly. This target was further tested with auger soil geochemistry (500m x 50m) which defined discrete Be-Cs and adjacent Sn-Ta anomalies, although the low-order anomalism and lack of pegmatite indicator minerals in the regolith downgraded this target and no further work is planned.
The South West Project includes an Earn-in & Joint Venture with Venture Minerals (ASX: VMS) and 100% Chalice owned tenure.
Strategic Investments
Encounter Resources Limited (ASX:ENR)
In April 2024, the Company acquired a strategic ~6.1% interest in Encounter Resources Limited (ASX: ENR) for $7.7 million. Encounter is a mineral exploration company focused on discovering major copper and critical mineral deposits in Australia. It has 100% ownership of the Aileron Project, which contains prospective tenements in the West Arunta Province of Western Australia, adjacent to WA1 Resources’ (ASX: WA1) Luni niobium Resource.
The Company’s interest in Encounter was valued at $20.2 million at 30 June 2024.
Caspin Resources Limited (ASX:CPN)
The Company holds ~8.7% interest in Caspin Resources valued at $0.5 million at 30 June 2024. Caspin is a mineral exploration company actively exploring projects in the West Yilgarn and West Musgrave provinces.
| 25
Financial Performance
The loss for the year ended 30 June 2024 of $39.5 million was 39.8% lower (or $26.1 million) than the net loss of $65.6 million for the year ended 30 June 2024, largely due to a $19.3 million reduction in exploration and evaluation expenditure (Table 1), lower share-based payments of $0.8 million, offset by an increase in interest income of $2.1 million and income tax benefit of $4.0 million. Interest income increased due to higher interest rates applied to term deposits held during the financial year.
Corporate and administration costs decreased from $6.3 million to $6.0 million.
Financial Position
At 30 June 2024, the Company remains well funded to execute its corporate strategy outlined on page 13. The Group had net assets of $162.8 million (2023: $187.1 million) and an excess of current assets over current liabilities of $109.4 million (2023: $141.2 million).
Current assets decreased by 23.9% to $115.2 million (2023:$151.5 million). Refer to the statement of cash flows discussed below for further details regarding the movement in cash equivalents during the year ended 30 June 2024.
Table 1. Exploration and evaluation expenditure by project
==> picture [229 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2024 2023
$’000 $’000
----- End of picture text -----
| Gonneville, Western Australia |
15,204 | 46,891 |
|---|---|---|
| Gonneville – development/ studies |
12,060 | 6,501 |
| West Yilgarn, Western Australia |
15,083 | 8,092 |
| Other generative projects |
145 | 349 |
| TOTAL | 42,492 | 61,833 |
Current liabilities at 30 June 2024 decreased significantly by 44.2% from $10.4 million in 2023 to $5.8 million at 30 June 2024. The decrease in liabilities is primarily due to a reduction in trade and other payables at 30 June 2024, in line with the reduction in overall costs and field activities.
Statement of Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June 2024 were $89 million (2023: $145.2 million). Cash used in operating activities reduced from $59.9 million to $44.1 million, primarily due to an increase in interest received on term deposits of $4.8 million compared to $2.7 million in 2023. Net cash used in investing activities increased by $10.8 million predominately due to the acquisition of a private property ($4.4 million) and the Company’s investment in ENR ($7.7 million).
The Company remains well funded to deliver the PreFeasibility Study in FY2025 and progress our other strategic objectives.
==> picture [522 x 225] intentionally omitted <==
26 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Mineral Resource Statement
The Company may report Mineral Resources at a date other than 30 June. However, the Company reviews its Mineral Resources annually in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code) 2012 Edition. The date of review is 30 June each year, to coincide with the Company’s end of financial year.
The Company declared an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Gonneville Project on 23 April 2024 (Table 2). This Mineral Resource Estimate was reviewed as at 30 June 2024. No material changes have occurred since the declaration date of 23 April 2024 to 30 June 2024. The current Mineral Resource Estimate is reported below:
Table 2. Gonneville Mineral Resource Estimate (JORC Code 2012), 23 April 2024.
==> picture [475 x 384] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Domain NSR ($A/t)Cut-off Classification Mass Grade Contained Metal
(Mt) (g/t)Pd (g/t)Pt (g/t)Au (%)Ni (%)Cu (%)Co (Moz)Pd (Moz)Pt (Moz)Au (kt)Ni (kt)Cu (kt)Co
Measured - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Indicated 7.0 1.9 - 0.05 - - - 0.43 - 0.01 - - -
Oxide – in-pit 25
Inferred 6.1 0.54 - 0.03 - - - 0.11 - 0.01 - - -
Subtotal 13 1.3 - 0.04 - - - 0.54 - 0.02 - - -
Measured 0.4 0.82 0.18 0.03 0.19 0.160 0.020 0.01 - - 0.67 0.56 0.07
Sulphide Indicated 14 0.68 0.16 0.03 0.16 0.103 0.020 0.30 0.07 0.01 22 14 2.7
(Transitional) 25
– in-pit Inferred 0.1 0.72 0.21 0.02 0.13 0.101 0.014 - - - 0.19 0.15 0.02
Subtotal 14 0.69 0.16 0.03 0.16 0.104 0.020 0.32 0.08 0.01 23 15 2.8
Measured 2.5 1.0 0.22 0.03 0.21 0.168 0.018 0.08 0.02 - 5.4 4.3 0.45
Indicated 380 0.60 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.088 0.015 7.4 1.7 0.3 570 340 57
Sulphide
25
(Fresh) – in-pit Inferred 240 0.60 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.074 0.015 4.6 1.1 0.15 350 170 35
Subtotal 620 0.60 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.083 0.015 12 2.8 0.45 930 520 92
Measured - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Indicated - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sulphide
110
(Fresh) - MSO Inferred 7.3 1.7 0.38 0.09 0.16 0.192 0.015 0.4 0.09 0.02 12 14 1.1
Subtotal 7.3 1.7 0.38 0.09 0.16 0.192 0.015 0.4 0.09 0.02 12 14 1.1
Measured 2.9 0.99 0.21 0.03 0.21 0.167 0.018 0.09 0.02 - 6.1 4.8 0.52
Indicated 400 0.63 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.087 0.015 8.1 1.8 0.32 600 350 60
All
Inferred 250 0.63 0.14 0.02 0.14 0.076 0.014 5.1 1.1 0.18 360 190 36
Total 660 0.63 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.083 0.015 13 2.9 0.5 960 540 96
----- End of picture text -----
Note some numerical differences may occur due to rounding to 2 significant figures. Includes drill holes drilled up to and including 7 November 2023.
| 27
Table 3. High-grade sulphide (transitional and fresh) breakdown within Gonneville Resource, 23 April 2024.
==> picture [475 x 318] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Domain NSR ($A/t)Cut-off Classification Mass Grade Contained Metal
(Mt) (g/t)Pd (g/t)Pt (g/t)Au (%)Ni (%)Cu (%)Co (Moz)Pd (Moz)Pt (Moz)Au (kt)Ni (kt)Cu (kt)Co
Measured 0.8 2.3 0.45 0.05 0.37 0.35 0.026 0.06 0.01 0.00 2.8 2.7 0.20
HG Sulphide
– above Indicated 25 1.4 0.32 0.07 0.21 0.22 0.020 1.1 0.26 0.06 54 54 5.1
200m 100
depth in-pit Inferred 1.1 1.2 0.37 0.04 0.20 0.14 0.019 0.05 0.01 0.00 2.2 1.6 0.21
Subtotal 27 1.4 0.33 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.020 1.2 0.28 0.06 59 58 5.5
Measured - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HG Sulphide Indicated 9.7 1.6 0.43 0.13 0.19 0.27 0.018 0.51 0.14 0.04 19 26 1.7
– below 200m 110
depth in-pit Inferred 15 1.6 0.39 0.07 0.21 0.16 0.019 0.51 0.18 0.03 30 24 2.7
Subtotal 24 1.6 0.41 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.018 1.3 0.32 0.07 49 50 4.4
Measured - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Indicated - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HG Sulphide 110
– MSO
Inferred 7.3 1.7 0.38 0.09 0.16 0.19 0.015 0.40 0.09 0.02 12 14 1.1
Subtotal 7.3 1.7 0.38 0.09 0.16 0.19 0.015 0.40 0.09 0.02 12 14 1.1
Measured 0.8 2.3 0.45 0.05 0.37 0.35 0.026 0.06 0.01 0.00 2.8 2.7 0.20
All Indicated 35 1.5 0.35 0.09 0.21 0.23 0.019 1.7 0.39 0.10 73 80 6.8
HG Sulphide
Inferred 23 1.6 0.39 0.07 0.19 0.17 0.018 1.2 0.29 0.06 44 39 4.1
Subtotal 59 1.5 0.37 0.08 0.20 0.21 0.019 2.9 0.69 0.15 120 120 11
----- End of picture text -----
Note some numerical differences may occur due to rounding to 2 significant figures. This higher-grade component is contained within the reported global Mineral Resource. Includes drill holes drilled up to and including 7 November 2023.
Key difference between March 2023 and April 2024 estimates are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Mineral resource comparison to prior reporting period
==> picture [474 x 177] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Domain Category Mass Grade Contained Metal
(Mt) (g/t)Pd (g/t)Pt (g/t)Au (%)Ni (%)Cu (%)Co (Moz)Pd (Moz)Pt (Moz)Au (kt)Ni (kt)Cu (kt)Co
Measured 2.7 1.1 0.24 0.03 0.23 0.18 0.019 0.09 0.02 - 6.2 4.9 0.51
Indicated 300 0.70 0.15 0.03 0.16 0.09 0.015 6.8 1.4 0.26 460 280 45
30 June 2023
Inferred 250 0.70 0.15 0.03 0.15 0.09 0.015 5.7 1.2 0.22 390 230 37
Total 560 0.70 0.15 0.03 0.16 0.09 0.015 13 2.7 0.48 860 520 83
Measured 2.9 0.99 0.21 0.03 0.21 0.167 0.018 0.09 0.02 - 6.1 4.8 0.52
Indicated 400 0.63 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.087 0.015 8.1 1.8 0.32 600 350 60
30 June 2024
Inferred 250 0.63 0.14 0.02 0.14 0.076 0.014 5.1 1.1 0.18 360 190 36
Total 660 0.63 0.14 0.02 0.15 0.083 0.015 13 2.9 0.50 960 540 96
----- End of picture text -----
28 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Table 5. Comparison of key parameters of the Mineral Resource Estimate between March 2023 and April 2024.
==> picture [475 x 255] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Key parameter March 2023 April 2024
Modelling of high-grade sulphide rich horizons Separate Pd, Ni and Cu high-grade
Mineralisation wireframing approach
above a nominal >0.9g/t Pd cut-off grade sulphide wireframes
No. of wireframes 14 100
Selective open-pit and underground mining
Mining approach Bulk open-pit mining only (larger block sizes)
(smaller block sizes)
Net Smelter Return (NSR) applied to each block –
variable recoveries according to grade based on
Nickel equivalent grade applied to each
metallurgical testwork to date and offtake terms
Revenue / cut-off approach block – fixed recoveries used in the nickel
from indicative western copper smelter proposals,
equivalent formula
western nickel-cobalt MHP benchmarks and an
independent marketing expert
Pit shell and nickel equivalent cut-off determined Pit shell and NSR cut-off determined using Whittle
using Whittle pit optimisation, below-pit pit optimisation, below-pit material reported
Economic constraint approach
material reported above sub-level cave cut- within Mineable Shape Optimiser (MSO) based
off mining method on long-hole open stoping mining method
Open-pit cut-off 0.35% NiEq A$25/t NSR
Underground cut-off 0.40% NiEq A$110/t NSR
A$100-110/t NSR in-pit and A$110/t
High-grade sulphide cut-off 0.60% NiEq
NSR underground
----- End of picture text -----
The Mineral Resource is an estimate and is, in a large part, based on interpretations of geological data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques. Actual mineralisation or geological conditions may be different from those predicted. No assurance can be given that Mineral Resources constitute or will be converted into Ore Reserves.
For further information on the April 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate refer to the ASX announcement titled “Gonneville Resource Remodelled to Support Selective Mining” dated 23 April 2024, available at www.asx.com.au ASX code “CHN”.
Governance Arrangements and Internal Controls
Chalice reports its Mineral Resource in accordance The Competent Persons responsible for the with the JORC Code (2012 Edition of the estimate are current members of professional Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration organisations recognised by the JORC Code: Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves) and the ASX Listing Rules. Mr Michael Millad is a Director and Principal
the ASX Listing Rules. Mr Michael Millad is a Director and Principal Geologist/Geostatistician at Cube Consulting, The Company has ensured that the Mineral and a Member in good standing of the Resources reported are subject to thorough Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Michael governance arrangements and internal controls Job is a Director and Principal Geologist/ including sign off by senior technical staff on inputs Geostatistician at Cube Consulting and a used in the preparation of the estimates. The 23 Fellow in good standing of the Australasian April 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate for Gonneville Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Both Mr was prepared by independent mining consulting Millad and Mr Job have sufficient relevant group Cube Consulting Pty Ltd with the pit experience to qualify as a Competent optimisation used to constrain the Mineral Resource Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the completed inhouse with input from SRK Consulting. Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves.
The Company’s reporting governance for Mineral Resource Estimates consists of several assurance measures, including:
- The Company received prior written consent from the Competent Persons to issue the Mineral Resource Statement in the form and context in which they appear in this Annual Report.
Peer review by external consultants and senior technical staff before being presented to the Company’s Board for approval and subsequent public reporting.
- The Company has received supporting documentation for the estimates to a level consistent with standard industry practice.
| 29
Competent Persons’ Statements
Competent Persons’ Statements
The information in this Annual Report that relates to Mineral Resources in relation to the Gonneville PGE-Ni-Cu-Co Project is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation compiled by Mike Millad and Mike Job.
Mr Millad is a full-time employee and director of Cube Consulting and is a member in good standing of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (#5799). Mr Millad does not hold securities in Chalice. Mr Millad has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Millad has reviewed the contents of this Annual Report and consents to the inclusion in this Annual Report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Mr Job is a full-time employee and director of Cube Consulting and is a Fellow in good standing of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (#201978). Mr Job does not hold securities in Chalice. Mr Job has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Job has reviewed the contents of this Annual Report and consents to the inclusion in this Annual Report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this Annual Report that relates to Exploration Results is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation compiled by Dr. Kevin Frost BSc (Hons), PhD, a Competent Person, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (#4530). Dr. Frost is a full-time employee of the Company, is entitled to participate in Chalice’s Employee Securities Incentive Plan and holds securities in Chalice. Mr Frost has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves. Dr Frost consents to the inclusion in the Annual Report of all technical statements based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Production Targets and Forecast Financial Information
The production targets and forecast financial information disclosed in this Annual Report is extracted from the Company’s ASX announcement “Gonneville Nickel- Copper-PGE Project Scoping Study”, dated 29 August 2023.
All material assumptions underpinning the production targets and forecast financial information derived from the production targets in the previous announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
Cautionary Statement
This Annual Report includes information extracted from the Company’s ASX announcement dated 29 August 2023, titled “Gonneville Nickel-Copper-PGE Project Scoping Study”.
For the production targets and forecast financial information for the 15Mtpa Case scenario (modelled LOM - 19 years), Inferred Resources comprise 14% of the production schedule over the modelled Life of Mine (LOM). For the 30Mtpa Case scenario (modelled LOM – 18 years), Inferred Resources comprise 37% of the production schedule over the modelled Life of Mine (LOM). Significantly, in both the 15Mtpa Case and 30Mtpa Case scenarios, the Inferred Mineral Resources do not play a prominent role in the initial mine plan. Throughout the first 15 years of production, the Inferred Mineral Resources constitute less than ~20% in both production schedules. Accordingly, Chalice has concluded that it is satisfied that the financial viability of both development cases modelled in the Scoping Study is not dependent on the inclusion of Inferred Resources early in the production schedule given
==> picture [230 x 150] intentionally omitted <==
30 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
an estimated payback period (from commencement of production) of ~2 years for the 15Mtpa Case and the 30Mtpa Case.
There is a low level of geological confidence associated with Inferred Mineral Resources and there is no certainty that further exploration work will result in the determination of Indicated Mineral Resources or that the production targets themselves will be realised.
Reliance on ThirdParty Information
This Annual Report contains information that has been derived from third party sources that has not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report may contain forward-looking statements and forward information (collectively, forwardlooking statements). These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report and Chalice Mining Limited (the Company) does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forwardlooking statements.
Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect the Company’s expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but are not limited to: the impact of the discovery on the Gonneville Project’s capital payback; the Company’s planned strategy, expenditure and corporate objectives; estimated timing of the Gonneville Project development schedule; the formal arrangements contemplated by the Memorandum of Understanding with Mitsubishi Corporation, the realisation of Mineral Resource Estimates; timing of anticipated production and final investment decision; sustainability initiatives; climate change scenarios; the likelihood of further exploration success; the timing and cost of planned exploration and study activities on the Company’s projects; mineral processing strategy; access to sites for planned drilling activities; planned production and operating costs profiles; estimated carbon emissions; planned capital requirements; the success of future potential mining operations and the timing of results from planned exploration programs and metallurgical testwork.
In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as, “aiming”,
“anticipate”, “considered”, “continue”, “could”, “estimate”, “expected”, “for”, “forecast”, “future”, “intend”, “indicates”, “is”, “likely”, “may”, “objectives”, “optionality”, “outlook”, “open”, “plan” or “planned”, “potential”, “strategy”, “target”, “will” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results may, could, would, might or will be taken, occur or be achieved or the negative of these terms or comparable terminology. By their very nature forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
Such factors may include, among others, risks related to actual results of current or planned exploration and development activities; whether geophysical and geochemical anomalies are related to economic mineralisation or some other feature; obtaining appropriate approvals to undertake exploration and development activities; metal grades being realised; metallurgical recovery rates being realised; results of planned metallurgical test work including results from other domains not tested yet; the outcomes of feasibility studies, scaling up to commercial operations; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined and feasibility studies are undertaken; changes in exploration and study programs and budgets based upon the results; successful completion of the objectives contemplated in the Memorandum of Understanding with Mitsubishi Corporation; changes in commodity prices and economic conditions; political and social risks, accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays or difficulty in obtaining governmental approvals, necessary licences, permits or financing to undertake future mining development activities; changes to the regulatory framework within which Chalice operates or may in the future; movements in the share price of investments and the timing and proceeds realised on future disposals of investments as well as those factors detailed from time to time in the Company’s interim and annual financial statements, all of which are filed and available for review on the ASX at asx.com.au.
Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
| 31
Tenement Schedule
==> picture [476 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Location Project Tenement No. Registered Holder Nature of interest
----- End of picture text -----
| Location | Project | Tenement No. | Registered Holder | Nature of interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Australia |
Nulla South | E77/2353 to E77/2354 | CGM (WA) Pty Ltd | 20% - JV with Ramelius Resources |
| Gonneville | E70/5118 to E70/5119 | CGM (WA) Pty Ltd | 100% | |
| Kings (regional) | E70/5350 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | |
| E70/5351 | CGM (Julimar) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5352 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5353 | CGM (WA) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5354 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5358 to E70/5361 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5363 to E70/5364 | GE Resources Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5367 to E70/5369 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5373 | Northam Resources Limited | 0% - Earn-in agreement, right to earn up to an 75% interest |
||
| E70/5151 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5865 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/5985 to E70/5986 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/6512 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/6514 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/6564 to E70/6566 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| E70/6644 | CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | 100% | ||
| Boomer Hill | E70/5009 to E70/5010 | Denise Elaine Watts-Butler | Earn-in agreement, right to earn up to a 90% interest |
|
| Northam Resources JV |
E70/6481 to E70/6482 | OBR Exploration Pty Ltd | 0% - Earn in agreement, right to earn up to a 70% interest |
|
| E70/3536-I | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/4243-I | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/4508-I | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/4692-I | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/5035 | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/5097 | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/5125 to E70/5127 | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/5139 to E70/5140 | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/5149 to E70/5150 | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/5152 to E70/5153 | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/5276 to E70/5277 | Northam Resources Limited | |||
| E70/5426 | Northam Resources Limited |
32 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
==> picture [475 x 703] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Location Project Tenement No. Registered Holder Nature of interest
E70/5456 Northam Resources Limited
Northam 0% - Earn in agreement, right
E70/5724 Northam Resources Limited
Resources JV to earn up to a 70% interest.
E70/5757 to E70/5759 Northam Resources Limited
E70/5263 to E70/5264 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/5355 to E70/5356 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/5404 GE Resources Pty Ltd 100%
E70/5535 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/5550 to E70/5551 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
0% - Earn in agreement, right
E70/5560 to E70/5561 Koojan Exploration Pty Ltd
to earn up to an 80% interest
E70/5624 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
Barrabarra E70/5666 to E70/5667 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/5695 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/5705 to E70/5706 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/6535 to E70/6536 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E59/2451 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
Western
Australia E59/2549 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E59/2797 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E59/2818 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/5532 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/5685 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E70/6219 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty
E70/4837 Ltd (51%) & Venture
South West
Lithium Pty Ltd (49%)
CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty
Earn-in agreement, right to
E70/5067 Ltd (51%) & Venture
earn up to a 70% interest
Lithium Pty Ltd (49%)
CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty
E70/5421 Ltd (51%) & Venture
Lithium Pty Ltd (49%)
Wubin E70/5357 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
E09/2436 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
0% - Earn in agreement, right
Narryer E09/2704 Red Heart Mines Pty Ltd
to earn up to a 75% interest
E09/2446 CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd 100%
CGM (WA) Pty Ltd (51%) & Earn-in agreement, right to
EL23764
Meteoric Resources NL (49%) earn up to a 70% interest
Northen
Territory Warrego North EL31608 CGM (WA) Pty Ltd 100%
EL31610 CGM (WA) Pty Ltd 100%
----- End of picture text -----
| 33
==> picture [107 x 323] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Sustainability Report
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [299 x 756] intentionally omitted <==
34 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Letter from the Chair of the Risk and Sustainability Committee
Dear Shareholders,
Welcome to Chalice Mining’s 2024 Sustainability Report.
Despite a challenging market backdrop, Chalice’s commitment to responsible sustainability practices remains integral to our Company purpose and culture. This is evident in the initiatives and projects we have progressed, aimed at minimising environmental impact, strengthening community engagement, and ensuring the safety of our workforce.
This commitment underscores our fundamental belief that exploration and mining can be conducted in ways that are sustainable, environmentally responsible and economically efficient.
The formal commencement of State and Commonwealth environmental approval processes for the Gonneville Project demonstrates this approach and marked a major milestone for the Company. This is the culmination of almost three years of environmental baseline work and stakeholder engagement, and places us well on the road towards development.
Safety remains paramount, and I’m pleased to report that our employees and contractors remained safe with no significant safety events through the year and a positive downward trend in recordable injuries from FY2023. Contributing to this performance is our day-to-day focus on understanding and managing our critical safety risks and embedding verification of critical controls in daily routines. We commenced a program to improve our critical risk management processes in FY2021 and further enhanced this work in FY2024 through a systematic review of our principal hazards and risks.
In FY2024, we continued to focus on strengthening our relationship with the local communities surrounding the Gonneville Project. We invested just over $1.2M in local procurement, supporting regional businesses through the purchase of goods and services. Additionally, we allocated ~$138,000 in grants and sponsorships to more than twenty local community groups across the Toodyay and Chittering Shires, reinforcing our commitment to deliver sustained shared value for stakeholders.
Another significant achievement during the year was the signing of a Heads of Agreement with the Shire of Toodyay for the future establishment of a community fund. This fund is the first of its kind, and the Agreement reflects the Shire and Chalice’s shared objective of delivering longterm benefits to the local communities surrounding the Gonneville Project.
==> picture [230 x 216] intentionally omitted <==
During the year, we also completed our second instalment of the Local Voices community survey program in the communities proximal to Gonneville. Local Voices provides Chalice with important insight into what matters most to community members, and to inform our decision-making processes. Pleasingly, our latest survey results showed that 75% of respondents have a moderate to very high level of support for the Gonneville Project and the development of a future mine on Chalice farmland.
While we work to deliver benefits to local communities, we equally seek to minimise our impacts on the environment. Pleasingly we had zero significant environmental incidents and maintained strong compliance with regulatory and permitting requirements across all our activities. We are also thankful for the work completed by Whadjuk and Yued Traditional Owners who continued to participate in environmental surveys and cultural heritage monitoring.
As you review this year’s Sustainability Report you will see a company focused on our long-term, with significant progress over the past year on our commitments to minimise our environmental footprint through strong environmental stewardship, provide a safe and healthy workplace for our employees and contractors, create value for all our stakeholders, and play our part in addressing climate change.
Yours sincerely,
Garret Dixon,
Chair of Risk and Sustainability Committee
| 35
Our Approach to Sustainability
Our approach to sustainability remains central to value creation, enabling Chalice to realise opportunities, effectively manage risk and contribute to sustainable development. Our focus on sustainability is integral to fulfilling our Company Purpose:
Purpose
To find and develop world-class critical minerals projects
Chalice set its corporate sustainability strategy in 2021 and has made it an integral part of our overarching business strategy, forming one of our six key strategic pillars. The sustainability strategy is reviewed annually and remains strongly aligned to our purpose, corporate strategy and material sustainability issues.
Chalice’s approach to sustainability is based on four pillars – or focus areas – that encompass our material sustainability issues and drive our performance across our activities through ten clearly defined, long-term
goals and targets. In essence, we seek to minimise our environmental footprint through strong environmental stewardship, manage climate change risk by contributing to the decarbonisation of the global economy and a low emissions future, create value for our stakeholders, and provide a healthy and safe workplace for our employees and contractors.
This report is structured in six sections that link to our four sustainability pillars and cover our ten material topics.
Our Sustainability Vision and Pillars
Deliver sustained shared value, for both stakeholders and shareholders, through responsible sustainability practices
==> picture [444 x 21] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Strong Environmental Manage Climate Create Value Healthy and
Stewardship Change Risk for Stakeholders Safe Workforce
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [466 x 122] intentionally omitted <==
36 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Strong Environmental Stewardship
Chalice is committed to rigorous standards and governance frameworks to ensure responsible environmental practices are followed in all our activities. We take our environmental responsibilities seriously. We are committed to achieving high standards in environmental management through understanding the sensitivities of the areas where we operate and applying the mitigation hierarchy, to avoid, minimise, mitigate, and where appropriate, offset our impacts on the environment.
Material Topics: Biodiversity • Land Rehabilitation • Water Stewardship
Manage Climate Change Risk
Chalice believes in being part of the solution to climate change by responsibly discovering and developing new critical mineral deposits that provide the key metals required for decarbonisation. Supporting a low carbon emissions future is central to our purpose and strategy as an organisation.
Material Topics: Climate Change • Our Carbon Footprint; along with Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Create Value for Stakeholders
As a Western Australian-based company, Chalice is proud to be a part of the local communities where we work. We have actively and transparently engaged with local communities and Traditional Owners to build respectful and collaborative relationships, with a goal of earning trust and achieving lasting social and economic benefits. This also helps us better understand the potential social, environmental, and economic impacts of our activities in the communities where we are based.
Material Topics: Community Engagement and Investment • Cultural Heritage
Healthy and Safe Workforce
Workforce health and safety lies at the heart of our business. Maintaining high health and safety performance requires the right mindsets and behaviours which, together with our systems, contribute to our strong safety culture. Our primary objectives are to maintain a culture of integrity and ownership, to provide a safe working environment at all Chalice locations and to maintain the health and wellbeing of our employees, contractors and local communities.
Material Topics: Health and Safety
| 37
People and Culture
Chalice is focused on promoting wellbeing, supporting mental health and embracing diversity and inclusiveness. As an exploration and development company, our permanent workforce is small, so it is critical to invest in and develop our people and attract the best talent.
Material Topics: Inclusion and Diversity; along with Organisation Culture
Operating Responsibly
Conducting our business ethically and with integrity is one of Chalice’s core values, and is embedded in our Code of Business Conduct, Whistleblower Protection Policy, and Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy. Chalice is committed to applying ethical business practices and sound systems of corporate governance and transparency.
Material Topics: Financial Performance • Business Ethics and Anti-corruption; along with Governance and Risk Management
Our Reporting
UN Sustainable Development Goals
We have used the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Universal Standards (GRI 1, 2 and 3) and other recognised standards as a guide to the principles and disclosures for sustainability reporting.
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs) promote action in areas that are critical to ending poverty, protecting the environment and improving the prosperity of all people through economic, social and technological progress. The goals are relevant for all countries and all sectors of society, including business.
Chalice has also adopted the recommendations from the Taskforce on Climate- related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) for addressing climate-related risks and opportunities. Implementation of TCFD will be undertaken progressively and our planned activities are outlined in the ‘Manage Climate Change Risk’ section of this Report.
Chalice recognises the importance of playing our part in helping achieve the UNSDGs by their target date of 2030. Of the 17 UNSDGs, we have identified eight immediate areas of focus.
The 2024 Sustainability Report covers the sustainability goals, activities and performance of our wholly owned and operated exploration and development projects in Western Australia. These are activities over which Chalice had operational control in the 2024 financial year and that materially contributed to our sustainability performance.
==> picture [157 x 96] intentionally omitted <==
On 9 December 2023, S&P Global notified the Company that it became a constituent of the S&P Dow Jones Sustainability Index Australia. The index represents the top 30% of companies in the S&P/ASX 200 based on longterm economic, environmental, and social criteria.
==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [59 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [58 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
38 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Stakeholders and Materiality
Chalice conducted a complete materiality assessment in FY2022 underpinned by GRI principles, to inform the scope and level of sustainability disclosures and make informed decisions on our sustainability strategy.
This process included a review of current and emerging issues facing Chalice, stakeholder and investor feedback, industry benchmarking, shifts in government policy and regulatory settings, and material company risks. Issues were then prioritised by internal and external stakeholders (such as industry associations, government and nongovernment organisations and investors) and subject matter experts via surveys and focused discussions.
Finally, issues were evaluated by the Key Management Personnel (KMP) and Board to ensure they were aligned to business and stakeholder priorities. The top 10 issues shown in the table on page 40 and disclosed in this Sustainability Report focus on environmental, social and governance topics that were identified as being critical for the current stage of the Company’s activities. These are the issues that we believe substantially impact our business performance and the decisions we make.
Identification of sustainability issues
Prioritisation
Validation
Understanding overall business context
Internal and external Key Management Personnel engagement and analysis and Board review
Following our comprehensive assessment and review of our material topics in FY2022 and FY2023, we have continued to assess and understand materiality through FY2024 by engaging with government stakeholders, local communities and investors. Our top 10 material issues have not changed since our FY2023 report was published and are listed on page 40.
In addition to formal materiality assessments, Chalice actively engages with stakeholders and local communities to understand the potential social, environmental, and economic impacts of our activities in the communities where we operate, as outlined in the ‘Create Value for Stakeholders’ section of this SustainabilityReport. We will continue to monitor these key issues in FY2025 as we continue to engage with our stakeholders and review our performance.
While both tailings and waste management have been identified by stakeholders as important, as with our previous year’s reporting these issues are not included in this report because Chalice does not currently produce any tailings material or noxious or toxic wastes that require disposal. These issues are currently being carefully considered as part of engineering studies and associated environmental assessments and approvals for the Gonneville Project.
==> picture [228 x 294] intentionally omitted <==
| 39
Top 10 Material Topics as Identified by Stakeholders
==> picture [474 x 687] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Relevant Sustainable
Theme Material Topic Material Topic - Description
Development Goals
Environment Biodiversity We manage potential impacts to biodiversity
and natural habitats, and we are committed
to making a positive contribution to regional
biodiversity values.
Land Rehabilitation We are committed to rehabilitation and
remediation, and ensuring our exploration activities
are progressively rehabilitated. We plan for
future mine closure.
Water Stewardship We are implementing measures to ensure that
our current and future activities do not adversely
impact local water supplies and water quality.
Climate Change We are transparent in our exposure to climate-
related risks and opportunities, and our plans and
commitments to reduce our emissions in line with
the objectives of the Paris Agreement - to limit
global warming to well below 2°C and to pursue
efforts to limit temperature increase to 1.5°C.
Social Community We actively engage and consult with local
Engagement communities and Traditional Owners to ensure
and Investment that their issues are understood by Chalice, that
they have a say in how we respond to these issues,
and that we contribute to regional economic
development and provide opportunities for
local communities.
Cultural Heritage We are engaging with Traditional Owners to
understand and appropriately manage cultural
heritage values.
Health and Safety Our highest priority is the safety of our workforce
and the communities where we are active.
Inclusion and Diversity We are committed to creating an inclusive and
diverse workplace that attracts the best talent and
leads to improved company performance.
Governance Financial Performance Our commitment to sound business practices and
strong financial disciplines underpin our goal to
deliver returns for shareholders.
Business Ethics and We manage and monitor ethics and integrity
Anti-corruption issues effectively.
----- End of picture text -----
40 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Strong Environmental Stewardship
Included in this section:
Environmental Management
Biodiversity
Baseline Environmental Surveys
Land Rehabilitation
Water Stewardship
Chalice is committed to rigorous standards and governance frameworks to ensure responsible environmental practices are followed in all our activities. We take our environmental responsibilities seriously. We are committed to achieving high standards in environmental management through understanding the sensitivities of the areas where we are active and applying the mitigation hierarchy to avoid, minimise, mitigate, and, where appropriate, offset our impacts to the environment.
At Chalice, we believe that meeting the global challenge of decarbonisation should not come at the cost of unacceptable local impacts. We fundamentally believe that mining can be undertaken sustainably and responsibly, and that mining development can co-exist with conservation and community values.
FY2024 activities at a glance
Referral of the Gonneville Project for State and Commonwealth environmental approvals.
Commencement of Black Cockatoo artificial hollow study.
- Continued baseline environmental studies for the Gonneville Project.
Continued progressive rehabilitation of all exploration activities.
FY2025 focus
- Conduct of environmental impact assessments for the Gonneville Project.
Establishment of seed production area as part of the Gonneville Restoration Project.
Continuation of the Black Cockatoo artificial hollow study.
Ongoing progressive rehabilitation of exploration activities.
As the world pledges to meet greenhouse gas emission targets, demand for the minerals needed to decarbonise the world is projected to surge. These critical minerals are essential to our everyday living and are essential in powering the technology and infrastructure needed for a decarbonised future. Large-scale deposits of critical minerals are rare, and the Gonneville Deposit is one of the largest and most significant discoveries in recent history.
Environmental Management
Environmental management measures are applied proactively across all our exploration programs through procedures and standards established within our ISO14001 aligned HSEC Management System. Implementing and maintaining an environmental management system that aligns with the ISO14001 standard enables identification and effective management of potential environmental risks, impacts and opportunities across all our activities.
All environmental management is undertaken in accordance with our Environment Policy, which commits us to achieving excellence in environmental management to minimise the potential short and long-term impacts of
our activities on the environment and local communities.
In addition to Chalice’s internal environmental governance, all of Chalice’s exploration activities are governed by regulatory permits that contain stringent conditions to protect the environment such as Conservation Management Plans, Native Vegetation Clearing Permits (NVCP) and Programs of Work (PoW).
During FY2024, the Company complied with all relevant environmental laws and the obligations under applicable legislation and permits. Chalice has not had to pay any fines or penalties for environmental or ecological matters.
| 41
FY2024 activities at a glance
==> picture [475 x 88] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Target
Significant Environmental Incidents 0 0 0 0
Progressive Rehabilitation of Exploration Drilling
1.23/0.99 ha 9.32/8.39 ha 9.95/8.21ha 1:1 ratio annually
Activities (disturbed ground : rehabilitated ground)
----- End of picture text -----
Biodiversity
Gonneville Biodiversity Strategy
To ensure science-based no net loss of species or habitat diversity as a result of mining operations.
Delivering the Biodiversity Strategy and Offsets
On-the-ground restoration work has begun to support fauna habitats and connect remnant areas of vegetation regionally.
Connectivity
Establish ecological corridors
Restoration
Implement restoration initiatives that address habitat fragmentation
Regeneration
Improve carbon sequestration
Chalice recognises the importance of understanding and managing land and biodiversity risks, and in contributing to a resilient environment in the areas surrounding our potential future operations. The Gonneville Project is situated adjacent to areas of biodiversity value including State Forest, conservation areas and areas of remnant woodland on agricultural land. Effectively managing biodiversity, rehabilitation and closure is therefore part of our commitment to responsible development and is integral to meeting community expectations and regulatory requirements.
Chalice’s Biodiversity Strategy covers potential future mining operations at Gonneville, including the direct and indirect footprint associated with mining, processing, and associated infrastructure. The Strategy spans the life of the mine and beyond to ensure sustainable post-mining closure and land uses. Central to the Strategy are two biodiversity goals:
To ensure science-based no net loss of species or habitat diversity as a result of any mining operations.
To strive towards a net positive legacy for significant species and our local community.
The Strategy and goals will be achieved through restoration initiatives that address habitat fragmentation, establish ecological corridors and improve carbon sequestration.
Chalice has developed a detailed implementation plan for the Biodiversity Strategy and is progressing on-theground restoration work at a site adjacent to the Julimar State Forest.
Baseline Environmental Surveys
A comprehensive program of baseline environmental surveys has been underway at the Gonneville Project and more regionally since 2021. This work is conducted by specialist botanists and zoologists covering a range of environmental factors including terrestrial and aquatic fauna, flora and vegetation, invertebrates, Black Cockatoos and Chuditch. The intent of these surveys is to gather information specific to the region to avoid and mitigate potential environmental impacts associated with the Gonneville Project and our exploration activities.
42 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
==> picture [548 x 248] intentionally omitted <==
environmental impact assessment, and the Index of Biodiversity Surveys for Assessments data standards.
Surveys undertaken across the year include but are not limited to the following activities:
Flora and vegetation including:
Dieback occurrence.
- Targeted surveys for conservation-significant flora and vegetation communities. Detailed surveys to characterise the flora, delineate vegetation communities and assess vegetation condition.
Fauna including:
Fauna monitoring prior to drill rig mobilisations.
- Surveys to gather broad fauna information and map fauna habitat.
Environmental baseline information will be utilised in the Gonneville Project’s formal environmental impact assessment and studies to avoid and minimise impacts to significant environmental values.
Land Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation is considered from the very first stages of exploration planning, such as choosing sites which require minimal vegetation and ground disturbance where possible. Chalice’s low-impact exploration in vegetated areas also avoids the need for mechanised clearing, which has obvious advantages for rehabilitation. By not clearing trees, the impact on existing root stock, topsoil and the seed bank is minimised.
Aquatic fauna surveys in dams and waterways.
-
Short Range Endemic surveys and habitat assessments.
-
Targeted Black Cockatoo surveys and habitat assessments.
-
Targeted mammal surveys for species like the Chuditch.
All rehabilitation sites in vegetated areas are photographed and monitored to ensure:
No increase or introduction of weeds.
No observable erosion has occurred.
- Hole capping is sufficient and has not created a hazard for animals.
Natural regeneration of vegetation is occurring.
Whadjuk and Yued representatives have participated in baseline fauna surveys, alongside zoologists. Whilst these engagements are crucial to environment and heritage, they also present a great two-way learning opportunity for both Chalice staff and Noongar representatives as they work side by side.
All survey methodology is consistent with relevant WA Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and Commonwealth Government technical guidance for
If the monitoring identifies an issue with the rehabilitation, rectification activities are implemented until the issue is addressed.
In FY2024, Chalice undertook 9.95 hectares of ground disturbance on farmland, with 8.21 hectares rehabilitated across all our operations. There was no ground disturbance associated with exploration activity in Julimar State Forest during FY2024; all exploration drilling was confined to existing tracks and cleared areas.
| 43
Water Stewardship
Groundwater and Surface Water
Chalice recognises that water is a critical shared resource that must be managed efficiently and responsibly. Whilst our current water usage in the exploration phase is minimal, we are conducting studies to understand the potential water usage of a mining operation at the Gonneville Project.
Our goal is to ensure that our activities do not compromise environmental values or have adverse impact on other local water users.
Together, the groundwater and surface water monitoring assists Chalice in better understanding the water cycle in the Project area and will inform our assessment of impacts of a potential future mine development and operation.
All of Chalice’s water sampling is undertaken by a specialised contractor, in line with relevant Australian Standards techniques. The water samples are sent through to a National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia (NATA) laboratory for independent analysis.
To deliver on this, and to better understand the groundwater and surface water systems at the Gonneville Project site, Chalice has been regularly sampling both groundwater and surface water since 2021. Chalice further expanded the groundwater and surface water monitoring program in FY2024, with another four groundwater monitoring bores and six surface water monitoring sites added to the network. The network now consists of 28 groundwater monitoring bores and 11 surface water monitoring sites.
The baseline groundwater and surface water sampling program will continue throughout the Gonneville Project development phase. Additional groundwater and surface water monitoring locations are being investigated at a regional scale.
Waste
All waste from our work sites (including hydrocarbon contaminated waste) is collected from site by a licensed contractor and disposed of offsite at licensed facilities.
Total liquid and solid waste generated in FY2024 amounted to 387 tonnes, compared to 582 tonnes in FY2023. Approximately 74% of this was solid waste and the remaining 26% was liquid waste. Approximately 97% of this total waste was sent to offsite waste disposal facilities with the remaining 3% being recycled.
Most of the waste during the year was general landfilled waste from on-site skip bins (58%), hydrocarbons (14%), and biowaste (10%).
Chalice’s annual total solid waste, by type of disposal method (NB: does not include liquid waste)
==> picture [475 x 180] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Solid Waste Generation Unit FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
Total waste recycled/reused Metric tonnes 0 0 0 0
Total waste disposed to landfill Metric tonnes 187 5 380 287
(non-hazardous)
Total waste disposed to landfill Metric tonnes 10 0 57 0
(hazardous)
Data Coverage % of company’s >95% <5% >95% >95%
identified waste sources
----- End of picture text -----
Non-recycled solid waste is all reported as being sent to landfill (including hazardous materials). There is no incineration or other disposal methods for solid wastes. Data coverage extends across solid wastes collected from waste contractors at key facilities. FY2022 had a gap in municipal waste collection data for the Avalon facility.
As an exploration company, Chalice does not have any tailings material, noxious or toxic wastes that require disposal.
44 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Manage Climate Change Risks
Included in this section:
Climate Change Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Our Carbon Footprint
Chalice believes in being part of the solution to manage climate change by responsibly discovering and developing new mineral deposits that provide critical minerals which are essential to decarbonisation. Supporting a low-carbon emissions future is central to our purpose and strategy as an organisation.
FY2024 activities at a glance
FY2025 focus
Undertook further assessment of climate change risks and opportunities.
Undertake assessment of carbon capture potential of Gonneville tailings material.
Board review of Climate Change Policy.
Commence greenhouse gas assessment for the Gonneville Project.
Engagement of Arca Climate Technologies to assess carbon capture potential of Gonneville tailings material.
Climate Change
Chalice’s Position on Climate Change
Chalice believes in being part of the solution to manage climate change by responsibly discovering and developing new mineral deposits that provide the key metals which are critical to decarbonisation. Supporting a low-carbon emissions future, including through our operations, is central to our purpose and strategy as an organisation.
Chalice acknowledges the scientific consensus and the position expressed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). There is an urgent need to limit global warming to well below 2°C and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C.
We recognise that climate change is a material issue for Chalice and anticipate that our strategy and operations will be influenced by climate-related issues in the short, medium and long term.
Chalice’s Climate Change Policy formalises and makes public the Company’s commitment to:
- Finding and developing new deposits of the minerals that are critical to the transition to a lowcarbon economy.
Identifying climate-related risks and developing plans to mitigate those risks.
Investigating opportunities to decarbonise our future mining to achieve net zero emissions by 2050.
Pursuing viable solutions for energy efficiency, electrification and renewable energy.
Increasing maturity of the application of the recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), so that the impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities are integrated into Chalice’s strategy and financial planning.
Transparent reporting and disclosure of Chalice’s greenhouse gas emissions, climate change mitigation and adaption plans and progress.
==> picture [230 x 124] intentionally omitted <==
| 45
Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Chalice issued its first TCFD disclosures in FY2022 and made a commitment to develop and start implementing a Roadmap in FY2023 to ensure progressive alignment with the TCFD recommendations.
The TCFD Roadmap and implementation plan were developed through engagement with members of Chalice’s Risk and Sustainability Committee and key management personnel and endorsed by the Risk and Sustainability Committee.
The Committee has responsibility for oversight of the Roadmap and management is responsible for its implementation.
The following key actions were taken in FY2024 to implement the TCFD Roadmap:
-
Board review of the Company’s Climate Change Policy.
-
Further, more granular, assessment of climate risks and opportunities by the executive team.
FY2022 Commit to develop and implement TCFD Roadmap
Governance and implement TCFD Roadmap Strategy Identify physical and transition risks and opportunities at general level Risk Management Implement revised Risk Management Framework and electronic risk Metrics and Targets Prepare and publish
Implement revised Risk Management Framework and electronic risk management platform
Prepare and publish organisational carbon footprint for FY2022
==> picture [303 x 214] intentionally omitted <==
Integration of climate risks and opportunities into Chalice’s risk management system (CGR).
Chalice will continue to progress with the implementation of the TCFD Roadmap in FY2025, as shown in the figure below.
FY2023 Strengthen climate governance to explicitly address climate risks and opportunities
FY2024 and beyond Designate accountability of relevant executives for climate risks and opportunities
Set strategic direction in Climate Change Policy and undertake initial exploratory scenario analysis
Develop more granular assessment of risks, opportunities and impacts with more detailed scenario analysis
Complete gap analysis and start preparation of climate risks and opportunities register
Integrate climate risks and opportunities into risk management system
Define benchmark carbon targets in engineering design
Undertake initial assessment of carbon intensity of potential product
46 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
TCFD Disclosures
Governance
In FY2023, Chalice refined its governance system to explicitly address climate-related issues. This work included a capacity-building session conducted with the Board and executive team to examine directors’ duties in relation to managing climate-related risks and disclosure obligations. Chalice’s strategic response to climate change was further developed through the adoption by the Board of a Climate Change Policy in FY2023.
The Board has ultimate responsibility for the oversight of Chalice’s strategic response to climate change and the associated risks and opportunities.
The Risk and Sustainability Committee reports to the Board and is responsible for the oversight of risk management including climate change risks, in accordance with Chalice’s Risk Management Framework and the Risk and Sustainability Committee Charter. The Charter stipulates that the Committee’s key responsibilities include the oversight of management’s identification, assessment and management of climate change risks and opportunities, in accordance with Chalice’s Risk Management Framework and the implementation of Chalice’s Climate Change Policy.
Management is responsible for the implementation of the Climate Change Policy, identifying, assessing and managing climate change risks and opportunities in accordance with Chalice’s Risk Management Framework. Chalice’s Managing Director and CEO holds core accountability for oversight, strategic leadership, and implementation of these commitments. In turn, the Managing Director and CEO delegates specific responsibilities to the General Manager – Environment and Community. The General Manager – Environment and Community has day-to-day responsibility to understand and manage sustainability risks including climate change. The General Manager reports to the Risk and Sustainability Committee and provides regular reports to the Board.
As further progress is made in the study and design phases for Gonneville, specific responsibilities will also be delegated to the General Manager – Project Development for sustainability issues that arise in respect of the engineering design, including the physical and transition risks and opportunities of climate change.
Strategy
Climate Change is one of the four pillars of Chalice’s Sustainability Strategy and identified as a material issue.
Chalice is focused on the key challenges of climate change and anticipates that the Company’s strategy and operations will be influenced by climate-related issues in the short, medium and long term. This focus led to the development of Chalice’s first Climate Change Policy, which was endorsed by the Board in FY2023.
The Climate Change Policy will be reviewed and further refined as Chalice continues to mature its alignment with the TCFD recommendations and as the Company evolves
from explorer to developer. The Board undertook a review of the Policy in FY2024 to ensure that it remains relevant and appropriate for the Company.
Risks and Opportunities for the Gonneville Project
As part of Chalice’s progress through the TCFD Roadmap, Chalice has identified and assessed the climate-related risks and opportunities relevant to the Gonneville Project.
With support from sustainability consultants Perspektiv, a draft risk and opportunity register was prepared in the appropriate format for integration with Chalice’s electronic risk management platform (CGR). The Chalice executive team undertook a workshop in FY2023 to review the descriptions of risks and opportunities provisionally included in the draft register. Further detail on the risk and opportunity assessment and scenario analysis was reported in the FY2023 Sustainability Report.
The transition risks include:
Impacts of carbon pricing
Increased electricity costs and constrained supply associated with transition to renewable energy
-
Availability and affordability of solutions for decarbonising operations
-
Increasing operating costs and constraints due to more stringent conditions and government regulation
The physical risks include:
Increased water stress and constrained water supply
- Impacts of extreme weather events on operations and value chain
Significant opportunities arise for Gonneville:
Increasing demand for critical minerals
Potential price premium for low carbon products
-
Favourable investment trends
-
Adoption of energy efficient technology
-
Government incentives to develop low carbon markets and technologies
A more detailed assessment of risks and opportunities was conducted in FY2024, and the register has been integrated into the Company’s risk management system (CGR).
Risk Management
Chalice’s Risk Management Framework sets the overall structures and processes for the identification and management of enterprise and operational risks. It designates specific responsibilities for the oversight of risks by the Board, the Risk and Sustainability Committee, senior management and supervisors.
| 47
Climate-related risks are specifically addressed in Chalice’s risk management system. The Risk Management Policy includes an explicit recognition that effective risk management mitigates material exposure to climate change and other sustainability risks. The Risk and Sustainability Committee Charter also states that Committee’s key responsibilities include oversight of management’s identification, assessment and management of climate change risks and opportunities in accordance with Chalice’s Risk Management Framework and the implementation of Chalice’s Climate Change Policy.
In accordance with the Risk Management Framework, risks are evaluated by workshops with senior management (for enterprise risks) and workshops with senior management and supervisors (for operational risks). Risks are identified and ranked, and control actions and ownership allocated.
Reviews are conducted semi-annually and material outcomes are presented to the Risk and Sustainability Committee, which reports to the Chalice Board.
Chalice uses an electronic risk management platform (CGR), which contains enterprise and operational risk registers. Climate-related risk and opportunities are included in CGR.
During FY2024, further work was undertaken to assess risks, apply risk ratings and develop controls. Progress will continue to be reported to the Risk and Sustainability Committee.
Metrics and Targets
Setting a goal to assess and benchmark the carbon intensity of Chalice’s products remains an objective of the Sustainability Strategy. In FY2023, Chalice engaged external consultants Perspektiv to prepare a study of the potential carbon intensity of nickel products from the Gonneville Project.
Chalice intends to define benchmark carbon targets in the basis of design for a mine at Gonneville and is planning further work to develop this in FY2025.
Our Carbon Footprint
Chalice engaged the expertise of Life Cycle Assessment Certified Practitioners from Perspektiv to conduct an organisational carbon assessment of the Company’s activities. The review assessed Chalice’s operations, centred on its head office and the Gonneville Project site in Western Australia, alongside a number of exploration projects throughout Australia.
The assessment of Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions in this report adheres to several international and national standards, including the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol, the Australian Standard for Organisation Level Quantification and reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions AS ISO 14064.12006 (reconfirmed 2018), the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER), and the National Greenhouse Accounts Factors (NGA 2023). Task Force on Climate-
related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Recommendations have been reviewed to ensure this report aligns with Chalice’s reporting requirements.
As per the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol’s guidance, Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions have been investigated across a range of activities:
-
Scope 1: Direct emissions under Chalice’s operational control, including emissions from combustion of fuel and natural gas. This includes energy uses invoiced directly to Chalice. It excludes indirect emissions from energy uses operated by contractors and suppliers.
-
Scope 2: Indirect emissions associated with the generation of electricity consumed by assets owned, operated, or occupied by Chalice.
Scope 3: Emissions resulting from upstream supply chain and downstream demand chain which also includes contractor activities (drilling, earthworks, etc.) at key facilities, as well as offsite activities such as freight, business travel, and waste disposal.
Calculation of all GHG emissions was done on basis of Chalice’s financial accounts data and organisational control. Perspektiv conducted the GHG inventory, assessed all quantifiable sources using industry practice calculation methods, and reviewed the relevance of other non- quantified emissions sources.
All direct Scope 1 emissions and indirect Scope 2 emissions associated with electricity use have been quantified in line with the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) guidelines. Major Scope 3 emissions have also been quantified.
Overall, the FY2024 footprint has decreased by 43% when compared to FY2023. This was mainly due to a decrease in activity, with insignificant gains from efficiencies or renewable energy substitution. Chalice’s total organisational greenhouse gas emissions for FY2024 amount to 2,368 tCO2-e. For context, in 2021, the Australian - average household emitted 15 to 20 tonnes of CO2 equivalent gas, Chalice’s total emissions this financial year would therefore be equal to emissions from up to 158 average Australian households.
Scope 3 continues to be the highest contributor to Chalice’s emissions, accounting for 90% of the total footprint (2,119 tCO2-e).
Scope 1 and 2 emissions contribute to 7% (174 tCO2-e) and 3% (75 tCO2-e) respectively. Scope 2 emissions occur from the consumption of electricity from the grid.
==> picture [229 x 99] intentionally omitted <==
48 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
==> picture [475 x 196] intentionally omitted <==
Chalice’s annual scope 1 direct GHG emissions
==> picture [475 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Direct GHG (Scope 1) Unit FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
Total direct GHG emissions Metric tonnes CO2- 338 174 289 174
(Scope 1) equivalents tCO2-e]
Data coverage % of company’s identified energy uses 100 100 100 100
----- End of picture text -----
Chalice’s annual scope 2 indirect GHG emissions from consumption of electricity (location-based vs market-based method of calculation)
==> picture [475 x 170] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Indirect GHG (Scope 2) Unit FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
Location-based method for Metric tonnes CO2- 50 81 60 60
total Scope 2 equivalents [tCO2-e]
Data coverage % of company’s identified energy uses 100 100 100 100
Market-based method for Metric tonnes CO2- 57 93 80 75
total Scope 2 equivalents [tCO2-e]
Data coverage % of company’s identified energy uses 100 100 100 100
----- End of picture text -----
Scope 1 and 2 emissions are mostly related to energy consumption and associated combustion of gaseous, liquid and solid fossil fuels. Non-energy related Scope 1 and 2 emissions sources for Chalice are currently deemed non-relevant.
Total Indirect Scope 3 Emissions by Year [tCO2-e]
| Indirect GHG (Scope 3) | Unit | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3) |
Metric tonnes CO2- equivalents [tCO2-e] |
2,754 | 4,438 | 3,754 | 2,119 |
| 49
FY2024 Scope 3 emissions by GHG Protocol emissions category
==> picture [475 x 664] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
GHG Protocol Emission Emissions in the FY2024 Reporting
Emissions calculation methodology and exclusions
Category Year (Metric tons CO2-e)
Drilling and earthworks: modelled using activity-
based data from contractors (drill type meters,
earthworks hours, and typical fuel consumption
01 Purchased goods and 1,483 per unit of work).
services
Geophysics: calculations referring actual
$ spend on fuel.
Water: kL quantity data.
Available data suggests minimal/
02 Capital Goods Not quantified insignificant emissions.
03 Fuel-and-energy- Calculations refer to same quantities reported
related-activities (not 53 under Scope 1 and 2 but using the Scope 3
included in Scope 1 or 2) emissions factors.
04 Upstream transportation 52 Actual activity-based calculations referring $
and distribution expenditure data.
05 Waste generated in 360 Actual activity-based calculations referring weight
operations or volumetric waste data.
Actual activity-based calculations referring vehicle
06 Business travel 133 km travelled by land, passenger km travelled by
air and some $ expenditure data.
07 Employee commuting Not quantified No data available. Deemed insignificant.
Partially quantified for headquarter office base
build energy use (calculations refer to NABERS
08 Upstream leased assets 38 energy reports). Plant and fleet leases direct
energy use addressed in Scope 1.
09 Downstream
transportation and Excluded. Not yet relevant.
distribution
10 Processing of sold
Excluded. Not yet relevant.
products
11 Use of sold products Excluded. Not yet relevant.
12 End of life treatment of Excluded. Not yet relevant.
sold products
13 Downstream leased Excluded. Not relevant.
assets
14 Franchises Excluded. Not applicable.
15 Investments Excluded. Not relevant.
16 Other upstream Excluded. Not relevant.
17 Other downstream Excluded. Not relevant.
----- End of picture text -----
50 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions are shown below as per Chalice’s financial account structure. The relative contribution by emissions source remain similar since FY2022 with the top three contributors being:
-
Emissions associated with drilling activities, amounting to a total of 1,306 tCO2-e (55 %)
-
Solid waste emissions, amounting to a total of 324 tCO2-e (14%)
Fuel combustion emissions, amounting to a total of 204 tCO2-e (6%)
FY2024 Scope 1,2 and 3 emissions by activity
==> picture [230 x 260] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
3% 2% 1%
Geophysics Freight Electricity
(Base Building)
4%
1%
Electricity
Liquid Waste
4%
Earthworks 1%
All Other
4%
Business
travel
Fuel Drilling
9% 62%
Solid Waste
14%
----- End of picture text -----
Year-on-year Trend of Emissions by Scope (tCO2-e)
==> picture [230 x 231] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
1 2 3
2119
FY2024 75
174
3754
FY2023 80
289
4438
FY2022 93
174
2754
FY2021 57
338
0 2000 4000
tCO2-e
----- End of picture text -----
Energy
In FY2024, direct energy consumption by Chalice amounted to 815 MWh, compared to 1,070 MWh in FY2023. The majority, or 79%, of this energy use stems from fuel consumption. The remainder comprises of electricity (15%) and gas (6%) use. This covers all sites for which energy is billed directly to Chalice. Grid electricity consumption includes 19% renewable energy as per the Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET).
Reported renewable energy consists of jurisdictional/mandatory renewable electricity and onsite/rooftop generated electricity.
Chalices annual energy consumption by non-renewable/renewable
==> picture [475 x 108] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Energy consumption Unit FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
Total non-renewables MWh 569 802 1,041 784
Total renewables MWh 21 29 29 31
% of company’s
Data coverage identified energy uses 100% 100% 100% 100%
----- End of picture text -----
Annual energy consumption figures exclude energy consumed by contracted third parties such as for drilling, earthmoving and transport operations.
Overall, between FY2023 and FY2024, energy use has decreased by 24%. The highest decrease is observed for fuel energy, which decreased by 28% from FY2023 to FY2024. This reflects a decrease in exploration activities in the Julimar region over this period.
Similar to the last reporting period, total energy generation from two solar PV systems at Avalon Homestead totalled 14.9 MWh of energy, with approximately 5.2 MWh of this electricity exported back to the grid.
| 51
Create Value for Stakeholders
Included in this section:
Community Engagement & Investment
As a Western Australian-based Company, Chalice is proud to be a part of the local communities where we work. We have actively and transparently engaged with local communities and Traditional Owners to build respectful and collaborative relationships, with a goal of earning trust and achieving lasting social and economic benefits. It also helps us better understand the potential social, environmental, and economic impacts of our activities in the communities where we are based.
From the discovery and early development of the Gonneville Project in 2020, Chalice has recognised that community engagement is critical.
Chalice considers the communities in the Shires of Toodyay and Chittering as key stakeholders, alongside neighbouring communities such as Northam, Goomalling, Victoria Plains, and the cities of Swan and Wanneroo, which are proximal to our Gonneville Project and associated infrastructure. All community engagement is undertaken in accordance with our Community and Heritage Policy.
As part of these communities, local employment, procurement and sponsorships are among the best ways Chalice can contribute today.
Chalice Values, Vision and Strategy
Community Engagement
==> picture [428 x 262] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Local Community Development and Investment Framework
Community
Local Economic Development
Investment
Employment and Training Contracting Procurement
Local employment Commitment to Commitment to Community
opportunities local contractors local suppliers Investment Program
Local Content Plan
Local Content Local procurement Chalice Mining
Training Plan Strategy Community Fund
programs
Contractor In-kind contributions
Traditional Owner
Traditional Owner Procurement (e.g.employee
Participation Plan
Participation Plan Standards volunteerism)
Social Assessment Economic Assessment Regulatory Assessment & Approvals Engineering Studies
----- End of picture text -----
52 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
To ensure we deliver on these commitments, Chalice has developed a Community Engagement Framework to apply a best practice approach in all areas of our business. This framework outlines our targets for community engagement and the supporting initiatives we are implementing to achieve this.
As the Gonneville Project has evolved, the level of engagement has also increased, and Chalice continues to use a range of platforms to effectively communicate and distribute information to our host communities. Regular communications include the Gonneville Project Community Newsletter, local advertising, information sheets as well as formal and informal meetings.
Chalice has an office in Toodyay to support our engagement activities, allowing us to build better and broader relationships through face-to-face and direct communication and gain a deeper understanding of community issues and desired outcomes.
During FY2024, we expanded our channels for community engagement and information distribution with the launch of a dedicated Project website and Facebook page. The Gonneville Project website is a central location for stakeholders to find the latest information about the Gonneville Project, with information tailored to the key concerns of the community. The community Facebook page aims to broaden our reach to community stakeholders as well as allowing us to proactively address questions and concerns as they arise.
A key focus for the Community Engagement Framework is the contribution to local economic development – or simply, to buy local and support local. In FY2024 Chalice contributed ~$138,000 in funding to local initiatives through the Chalice Community Investment Program, plus ~$1,242,000 in direct local spend through procurement of goods and service in the local shires surrounding the Gonneville Project.
Traditional Owners
Chalice continues to engage with the Traditional Owners through a collaborative approach, which has led to employment opportunities and the establishment of effective working relationships with Yued and Whadjuk representatives. This work and our achievements to date are covered in more detail in the Traditional Owner Engagement and Cultural Heritage section of this Report.
Government
Our engagement with local, state and federal government continued throughout the year and was mainly facilitated via face-to-face briefings, with the purpose of providing a sound understanding of project status, upcoming activities and required future approvals.
Chalice consistently ensures that government stakeholders are informed and updated, providing open and timely communication, responding to questions or issues promptly, and ensuring there is a two-way dialogue.
Stakeholder Engagement System
Chalice has implemented a robust stakeholder engagement system in which all engagements, including complaints are recorded, reviewed and dealt with in a constructive and timely manner. Our key stakeholders, their interests, and how we engage with them are summarised right.
How we engaged with stakeholders in FY2024
Chalice has engaged early, actively and transparently to build respectful and collaborative relationships with stakeholders:
-
Distribution of information to our host communities – Gonneville Project website, quarterly Community Newsletter, local advertising, information sheets and face-toface meetings.
-
Community Facebook page – a channel to share community engagement initiatives and activities and an opportunity to answer community questions directly and in a timely manner.
-
Email communications – sharing monthly updates and digital copies of the Community Newsletter directly to our community database.
-
Dedicated Chalice community office – a community hub for questions and information and an opportunity to engage directly with our team.
Chalice understands that community consultation will play a key role in all our planning, particularly as we consider a potential future mine at the Gonneville Project. To help us better understand the needs, concerns and priorities of the communities neighbouring our project, Chalice has engaged Voconiq to seek feedback through a third party and confidential survey program called Local Voices.
Local Voices is a unique community engagement program developed over 10 years within Australia’s national science agency, CSIRO. As part of this program, a series of surveys will be conducted to help Chalice better understand what matters most to community members, helping Chalice to inform decision making processes.
Following on from the introduction of the Local Voices Program in early 2023, on behalf of Chalice, Voconiq undertook a second community survey from February to March 2024. This second survey aimed to find out how local communities feel about key issues over time, with some questions repeated and some new topics introduced. Survey results were collated and analysed by Voconiq independently and confidentially.
| 53
There were just over 200 responses to the survey, with 72% of respondents living within 30km of the Gonneville Project. Overall, 75% of respondents have a moderate to high level of support for a potential mine on Chalice-owned farmland if Chalice manages impacts to the environment responsibly and minimises community disruption during construction and operations. Ten per cent of respondents to the survey slightly support the Project and 14% do not support it at all.
As a thank you for completing the survey, participants were able to nominate a community group of their choice to receive a $5 donation through the Local Voices Rewards program. To date $3,629 of donations have been unlocked for local community groups from the Local Voices surveys.
Community Investment
Established in 2020, Chalice developed a Community Investment Program to deliver positive long-term benefits through supporting local community-based initiatives.
Chalice continues to prioritise three areas for community investment:
Education
Initiatives that advance and improve regional educational opportunities Sharing of knowledge and capabilities for the benefit of the local community Support innovation and advancement for local residents Environment Initiatives that protect and rehabilitate the environment
Support the connection between community and the natural environment
Restore our natural environment and protect our ecosystems and threatened species
Community Connection
Supporting local opportunities, events and groups to strengthen the community connection within the region
Facilitate and support greater engagement between community members
Respect and recognise local heritage and culture
Our community contribution to date includes:
==> picture [474 x 137] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
FY2022 FY2023 FY2024
Chalice Community Investment contribution $70,000 $122,000 $138,000
Chalice - local procurement $1,215,000 $1,344,000 $1,242,000
Direct contractors – local procurement $1,567,000 $2,005,000 $450,000
Total $2,852,000 $3,471,000 $1,830,000
----- End of picture text -----
54 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
In FY2024, Chalice’s Community Investment Program contributed ~$138,000 directly into supporting local groups, including the following organisations:
Bindoon and District Agricultural Society Bindoon Bushrangers Cricket Club Bindoon Mountain Bike and Adventure Park Carnaby Crusaders Chittering Junior Football Club Julimar Volunteer Bushfire Brigade Marsupial Mamma’s and Pappas Wildlife Care Moondyne Festival Moorangup Progress Association Noongar Kaartdijin Aboriginal Corporation Toodyay Agricultural Society
Toodyay Bowls Club Toodyay Christmas Street Party Toodyay Cricket Club Toodyay CWA Toodyay District High School Toodyay Football Club Toodyay Junior Football Club Toodyay Kindergym Toodyay RSL Toodyay Tennis Club Toodyay Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service
==> picture [548 x 227] intentionally omitted <==
Chalice Mining Community Fund
In FY2024, the Company signed a landmark Heads of Agreement (HOA) with the Shire of Toodyay for the future establishment of the Chalice Mining Community Fund. The agreement reflects a shared objective to deliver long-term benefits to the local community from a potential mine.
Under the terms of the HOA, Chalice has agreed to provide funding for the delivery of community projects and programs that have been identified by the Shire of Toodyay and that align with Chalice’s eligibility criteria.
Eligible projects will demonstrate community development and social investment priorities that are aligned with and preserve and promote the Shire of Toodyay’s Council Plan, with a focus on local employment and training outcomes as well as other initiatives that contribute to community sustainability.
An initial step in the HOA has been the development of a Chalice Local Content Plan. This Local Content Plan outlines the ways that the Gonneville Project could potentially contribute to local job creation, training, business opportunities and procurement of goods and services from local businesses.
The HOA will also form the basis for Chalice to establish similar community funds with other neighbouring Shires in the region. The completion of a formal agreement and the establishment of the Community Fund are contingent on the Chalice Board making a Final Investment Decision (FID) in favour of proceeding with a development at the Gonneville Project, and the project achieving all the necessary approvals and funding requirements.
| 55
Cultural Heritage and Traditional Owner Engagement
Included in this section:
Heritage Agreements Cultural Heritage Traditional Owner Engagement
Traditional Owners have unique rights and interests to those of other stakeholders. Chalice recognises their rights, acknowledges their connection and responsibilities to their lands and waters, and respects their obligation to maintain culture, traditions and customs, and care for their country. We aim to establish collaborative and long-lasting relationships with all Traditional Owners on whose country we work, from which we can mutually benefit.
Our Community and Heritage Policy sets out our commitment to building respectful, trust-based and inclusive relationships with Aboriginal communities.
Heritage Agreements
The Gonneville Project is located within the South West Native Title Settlement area. The Whadjuk and Yued peoples are the Traditional Owners of the lands of the Julimar region, which is subject to two Indigenous Land Use Agreements.
These ethnographic and archaeological surveys led to the development of cultural heritage management plans by Yued and Whadjuk that set out both groups’ expectations of Chalice for the protection and management of their cultural heritage. This includes processes to avoid impacts to cultural heritage material, build cultural competency of Chalice employees and contractors, ensure the cultural safety of Traditional Owners, and requirements for monitoring of exploration activities in the Julimar State Forest by Whadjuk and Yued.
In FY2024, Whadjuk Traditional Owners nominated by the Whadjuk Aboriginal Corporation (Whadjuk AC) Cultural Advice Committee, conducted ethnographic and archaeological cultural heritage surveys across all Chaliceowned farmlands including the Gonneville Project site.
In FY2025 Chalice will work with the Whadjuk AC to develop a cultural heritage management plan that will outline the appropriate management of Aboriginal heritage for the Gonneville Project.
Chalice entered into heritage agreements with Yued and Whadjuk in 2018, in the form of two separate Noongar Standard Heritage Agreements. These agreements require Chalice to engage with the South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council (SWALSC) before undertaking physical works or operations which may trigger the requirement for a cultural heritage survey to be conducted.
Chalice’s regional exploration program also extends into Ballardong, Yamatji Nation and Wajarri Yamaji country. We have commenced engagement with these groups through their representative Regional Corporations and as required under our heritage agreements. Chalice has heritage agreements in place with Traditional Owner groups across all active tenements in Western Australia.
Collaboration with Yued and Whadjuk
Chalice has been working with Yued and Whadjuk representatives to understand the cultural values across exploration areas in the Julimar State Forest and to identify and address the risks and opportunities to cultural heritage that might arise from our activities. In 2021, Yued and Whadjuk Traditional Owners conducted cultural heritage surveys across all proposed exploration areas in the Julimar State Forest.
Cultural Heritage Monitoring
Yued and Whadjuk Traditional Owners, through their cultural heritage management plans, continued to lead the monitoring and protection of cultural heritage for the Gonneville Project and exploration activities in the Julimar State Forest.
This included monitoring conducted by Yued and Whadjuk representatives before a drill rig can be mobilised to an area. The role of the monitors is to confirm that all drilling activities are taking place within areas that do not contain any cultural heritage sites.
Traditional Owner participation in environmental surveys
Chalice acknowledges the ongoing contribution of Indigenous knowledge to the scientific community and invites Traditional Owners to participate in environmental survey work where possible.
Whadjuk representatives were involved in a variety of environmental studies work throughout the year, including aquatic and vertebrate fauna surveys, flora surveys and surface water monitoring.
56 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Health & Safety in the Workforce
Workforce health and safety lies at the core of our business. Maintaining high health and safety performance requires the right mindsets and behaviours, which together with our systems, contribute to our strong safety culture. Our primary objectives are to maintain a culture of integrity and ownership, to provide a safe working environment at all Chalice locations and to maintain the health and wellbeing of our employees and contractors.
FY2024 activities at a glance
-
Implementation of a Psychosocial Hazard Management Plan
-
Improvement of the infield remote worker safety system
-
Roll-out of the Altora online contractor mobilisation, induction and onboarding tool
-
Implementation of a Principal Hazard Management Plan
FY2025 focus
-
Implementation of a Security Management Plan
-
Systems audit of critical risk processes and Principal Hazard Management Plan
-
Ongoing improvements to HSEC Management System to align to ISO 45001 Continual review of critical risks in accordance with operational activities
Health and Safety
Chalice is committed to ensuring occupational health and safety standards are implemented and owned by the workforce. Our Health, Safety, Environment and Community (HSEC) Management System governs our day-to-day activities, ensuring appropriate standards are adopted and hazards are identified, controlled, managed and monitored.
This system links directly to the Risk Management Framework, under which KMP regularly review critical enterprise and operational risks. These elements help us understand, mitigate and manage risks to the business, employees, contractors, stakeholders and the environment across all our activities, as well as track our overall performance.
The system aligns with ISO 45001 (occupational health and safety management systems), ISO 14001 (environmental management systems) and ISO 9001(quality management).
The Chalice HSEC Management System and processes are continually reviewed to ensure we can adapt to our exploration and project development portfolio. The system is comprised of four elements:
-
01 Corporate Policies, Charters and Frameworks
-
02 Company-wide HSEC Standards, Plans and Procedures
-
03 Site-level HSEC Procedures
-
04 HSEC Databases and Systems
In FY2024, Chalice commissioned an external auditor, Bureau Veritas, to complete an ISO 45001 (2018) gap analysis. This audit identified several improvement opportunities including the documentation and further development of our consultation processes, further refinement of the HSEC Management Plan to align to ISO 45001 elements, and refinement of training and competency procedures and tools.
Following the audit, further improvements to our HSEC Management System have included the development of a consultation procedure, including the implementation of an Operational HSEC Committee with worker representation. Additionally, the development of a Security Management Plan has bolstered our identification of controls in relation to security risks. We also successfully completed the final stages of implementing the Altora
| 57
contractor management online portal, which enables contractor HSEC pre-qualification and personnel onboarding, site access and site induction training.
Our Health and Safety Policy outlines our commitment to implementing policies, systems, and procedures that assist with hazard identification, risk assessment and control, to ensure a safe system of work and mitigate the risk of health and safety incidents.
Performance and FY2025 Targets (includes contractors)
==> picture [475 x 137] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Target
Fatalities 0 0 0 0
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) 0 0 0 <0.3
High potential near-misses 1 0 0 0
Number of workers exposed above OEL 0 0 0 0
----- End of picture text -----*
Sum of (Total Recordable Injury Cases (resulting in absence from work for 2 or more weeks)×1,000,000) / total hours worked for the year *Occupational exposure limit (OEL) for fibrous material is 0.01 fibres/milliliter
There was a significant reduction in site operational hours in FY2024, with work hours totalling 145,505 compared with 252,187 work hours in FY2023. There were no lost time injuries during FY2024. There was a positive downward trend in recordable injuries with one restricted work case in FY2024 period, compared with eight in the previous financial year.
Currently Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) is not a metric used as a performance target due to low monthly workhours, meaning the TRIFR would not provide
a meaningful indicator of safety performance and improvement focus areas.
The reduction in operational hours has resulted in a positive change to the risk profile, resulting in decreased exposure hours to our critical risks such as drilling, dropped or falling objects and heavy vehicle movements. Exposure hours to critical risks such as vehicle incidents in remote areas and workers affected by heat/humidity have increased due to an increase in activity at regional exploration projects such as Narryer and Barrabarra.
Health and Safety Training
The primary focus of the health and safety training program in FY2024 has been to ensure that our field-based team are able to respond effectively in the event of an emergency in a remote location. Field-based teams have completed training in:
-
Statutory Supervisor
-
Operate and Maintain 4WD
-
4WD Recovery Techniques Side by Side (RTV) Operation
-
Fire Extinguisher Operation
-
Provide First Aid
-
Remote/Advanced First Aid
-
Low Voltage Rescue
We envisage that the training profile will not materially change in FY2025.
Health and Hygiene
The Health and Hygiene Management Plan was further refined in FY2024 to reflect the reduction in drilling activities and workforce numbers at the Gonneville Project site. This refinement has resulted in a reduction in required sampling for potential health and hygiene risks within similar exposure groups (SEGs).
The development and implementation of the Psychosocial Hazard Management Plan allows for greater line-of-sight of the key controls we deploy to ensure a mentally healthy workplace. One of the key aspects of the plan is to ensure workers in remote settings can communicate using mobile Starlink setups and satellite communications. This has enabled workers to stay connected to families and colleagues while working away from home.
58 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
People and Culture
At Chalice, we believe in creating positive and supportive relationships with our people. Our employees play an essential role in supporting Chalice to achieve its objectives and purpose.
Our Company values remain at the heart of our approach to people:
==> picture [365 x 130] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Values Integrity Ownership
Do the right thing Think like an owner
Alignment Urgency
If Chalice succeeds, Act today, not
we all succeed tomorrow
Advancement
Improve every day
----- End of picture text -----
During the year, the total number of workforce employees at Chalice reduced. This reduction was largely due to the conclusion of resource drilling at the Gonneville Project, as the Company made the transition from high-intensity fieldwork to desktop development studies.
The Company also implemented a decisive and significant reduction in corporate overheads in order to maintain its strong financial position. This saw several executive, management and personnel changes implemented as part of a rationalisation of the Company’s organisation and management structure.
Diversity and Inclusion
Chalice recognises the importance of building a diverse and inclusive team with different individual backgrounds, skills, experiences and perspectives. At 30 June 2024, women made up 39% of our overall workforce with the respective proportions of women at various levels across the whole organisation set out in Chalice’s Corporate Governance Statement.
==> picture [475 x 180] intentionally omitted <==
| 59
Included in this section:
Operating Responsibly
Corporate Governance Business Ethics and Anti-Corruption Financial Performance Risk Management
Conducting our business ethically and with integrity is one of Chalice’s core values, and is embedded in our Code of Conduct, Whistleblower Protection Policy and Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy. Chalice is committed to applying ethical business practices and sound systems of corporate governance and transparency.
Corporate Governance
The Board acknowledges the importance of good corporate governance in striving to meet the expectations of our stakeholders whilst achieving the strategic objectives of the Company in an ethical and responsible manner.
Chalice’s corporate governance framework has been developed to ensure that the Company is managed effectively, within a comprehensive system of control and accountability, while also encouraging a corporate culture that is aligned with one of our key values “acting with integrity”.
The Company is committed to aligning its governance processes with the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations 4th edition (“Principles and Recommendations”). Through this process the Company is currently complying with 34 of the 35 Principles and Recommendations. Our Corporate Governance Statement for the year ended 30 June 2024, detailing the key aspects of our corporate governance framework, is available on our website along with information on our full suite of corporate governance practices at https://chalicemining.com/about-us/ corporate-governance/.
During the year, the Board and its Committees were actively engaged in their governance responsibilities and fulfilling their role in accordance with the Board and Committee Charters. Key focus areas of the Board during the year included:
Annual Board appraisal process.
Annual Board skills assessment.
- Assessment of the measurable objectives for gender diversity.
Periodic review of the Board Charter, Committee Charters and governance policies.
Continuing to review the Company’s Risk Management Framework to ensure that it appropriately evolves with the development of the Company and emerging risks.
Updated strategic initiatives adopted by the Board aimed to deliver long-term value to shareholders.
Business Ethics and Anti-Corruption
The Board is responsible for approving Chalice’s core values. Conducting our business ethically and with integrity is one of Chalice’s core values, and our governance structures are designed to encourage ethical behaviour that we believe will create a corporate culture that not only improves Chalice’s performance as a business, but also positively enhances the impact of the organisation on all of our stakeholders.
Code of Conduct
Our Code of Conduct (Code) guides the behaviour of our people on how to conduct themselves with integrity, honesty and fairness in all business practices and to observing the rule and spirit of the legal and regulatory environment in which the Company operates.
==> picture [229 x 245] intentionally omitted <==
60 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Our Code is supported by a range of policies including our Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy, Whistleblower Policy, Diversity and Inclusion Policy and Human Rights Policy, all of which are available on our website at https:// - - chalicemining.com/about us/corporate governance/.
Key Chalice advisers, consultants and contractors are made aware of the expectations set out in the Code and the Group’s policies.
Material breaches of the Code of Conduct must be reported to the Board. There were no reported breaches of the Code of Conduct during the year ended 30 June 2024.
Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy
Chalice does not tolerate any form of bribery or corruption. Bribery and corruption involves the misuse of position and influence, in return for improper advantage, undermining integrity and fairness.
violations) of the Company’s Code of Conduct or other policies and provide effective protection from victimisation or dismissal to those reporting by implementing systems for confidentiality and report handling.
Material matters reported under the Whistleblower Policy must be reported to the Board. There were no matters reported under the Whistleblower Policy during the year ended 30 June 2024.
Human Rights
While Chalice is not currently required to prepare a Modern Slavery Statement in accordance with the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth), the Company has adopted a Human Rights Policy to communicate Chalice’s commitment to human rights and our commitment to seek continual improvement throughout our organisation to uphold human rights.
The Human Rights Policy outlines our commitments to:
An Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy has been adopted to provide information and guidance to people working for the Company, including the Board, employees, consultants and contractors.
The Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy explains conduct that is prohibited and provides guidance on dealing with gifts and hospitality, donations, sponsorships, approval requirements and the records required to be maintained.
The consequences for breaching the Anti-Bribery and AntiCorruption Policy depend on the severity of the breach but may include a reprimand, formal warning, demotion and/or termination of employment.
Any material breaches of the Anti-Bribery and AntiCorruption Policy must be reported to the Board. There were no reported breaches of the Anti-bribery and AntiCorruption Policy during the during the year ended 30 June 2024.
Whistleblower Policy
The Company has established a Whistleblower Policy to encourage the reporting of suspected unethical, illegal, fraudulent behaviour and violations (or suspected
-
Developing, embedding and improving processes to identify and prevent adverse human rights impacts caused or contributed to by our business and operations.
-
Not engaging in, or tolerating, forced or compulsory labour, other forms of modern slavery or child labour, and ensuring compliance with all relevant laws.
-
Promoting and maintaining a physically and psychologically safe workplace that is free from violence, threats of violence, bullying, harassment, sexual harassment, discrimination, inhumane treatment or abuse.
-
Acting with integrity and fairness and not discriminating against any individual based on race, religion, ethnic origin, nationality, age, marital or relationship status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, pregnancy, parental status, disability, or other legally protected status.
-
Respecting human rights related to working conditions, providing a safe and healthy workplace, employee privacy, freedom of association, speech and collective bargaining, maximum working hours, minimum wages, accommodation, equal and decent pay, and equal opportunity.
==> picture [475 x 135] intentionally omitted <==
| 61
Financial Performance
Our commitment to sound business practices and strong financial disciplines underpins Chalice’s goal to deliver strong returns for our shareholders.
Please refer to the Operating and Financial Review section of this Annual Report for further information on our Financial Performance.
Chalice Corporate Governance System
==> picture [474 x 580] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Stakeholders
Government & Traditional
Community Regulators Shareholders Owners Industry
Board of directors
Remuneration&
Risk & Sustainability Audit Nomination Technical
Committee Committee Committee
Committee
Managing Director and CEO
Leadership Team
Our People
Purpose, Culture and Values
Integrity Ownership Alignment Urgency Advancement
Do the right thing Think like an owner If Chalice Act today, Improve every day
succeeds, we all not tomorrow
succeed
Delegation
Accountability & Reporting
----- End of picture text -----
62 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Risk Management
Overall accountability for risk management lies with the Board of Chalice. The Board is supported in its oversight of risk by the Risk and Sustainability Committee. The Audit Committee assists the Board with its oversight of financial assurance matters. The Board annually reviews and approves the Risk Management Framework and sets the overall risk appetite. The Board endorsed an updated Risk Management Framework during the year ended 30 June 2024 in accordance with the Company’s Risk Management Framework.
The Board has delegated the responsibility for implementing the Risk Management Framework and managing material risks to the Managing Director and CEO and Executive KMP.
The Board, Executive KMP, and the Risk and Sustainability Committee review the risk profile of the business and implement and monitor controls to effectively manage risks. Reviews of mitigations and verifications of controls are undertaken to ensure their effectiveness.
Further information can be found in the Risk and Sustainability Committee Charter and Risk Management
Policy available at https://chalicemining.com/about-us/ corporate-governance/.
Chalice’s Risk Management Framework focusses on the identification of material risks and the implementation and monitoring of the controls to mitigate those risks. Material risks are considered those financial and non-financial risks with major or extreme consequence (irrespective of probability) as well as those with major or extreme residual risk rating. Risk ratings are determined in accordance with ISO 31000:2018 recommended risk management practices.
While Chalice is in the exploration and evaluation phase, the risk management process focuses on material risks which have the potential to materially impact on the ability to execute Chalice’s long- term strategy. These material risks are comprised of categories such as Economic, Strategic, Social Licence, Operational, Environmental, Legal and Governance.
The Group’s identified material risks are summarised in the table below:
==> picture [475 x 368] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Risks Mitigating Actions
Major data loss or IT security breach Implementation of controls associated with
prevention, detection and data recovery supported
Failure to appropriately secure data could have by ongoing cyber security awareness training.
significant consequences to the Group through
loss of business continuity, reputational loss and Invest in cyber security processes, tools and expertise.
increased financial costs.
Impaired social licence to operate Maintaining a stakeholder management plan to
guide Chalice’s actions, engagement and behaviour.
Loss of stakeholder support could result in the loss of
social license to operate, disrupting operations or Development and implementation of a
delaying license approvals. sustainability framework.
Major Field Incident (Safety, Health or Environmental) Risk reduction by ensuring appropriate standards
are adopted, hazards are identified, controlled,
Exposure of our people to hazards at a level that managed and monitored appropriately, supported
causes harm. by a comprehensive Health, Safety, Environment and
Community (HSEC)Management System.
Environmental incident that negatively impacts the
environment and community in which we operate. Provide appropriate resources into the ongoing
maturity of the HSEC Management System together
with leadership development and training.
Loss of or Failure to Gain Land Access on Key Tenement Chalice seeks to actively engage with stakeholders
and has implemented internal controls designed to
Inability to undertake planned exploration activities manage agreements with landholders, Traditional
results in a loss of opportunity or financial loss. Owners and compliance with licence and
permit requirements.
----- End of picture text -----
| 63
==> picture [474 x 687] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Risks Mitigating Actions
Prior to undertaking any acquisitions, Chalice
Capital Mismanagement (new ventures)
undertakes appropriate due diligence to identify key
risks and to determine that the opportunity is aligned
Loss of reputation and negative shareholder returns
with Company strategy. Material acquisitions are
through the unsuccessful allocation of working
considered by the Board to ensure alignment with
capital to new ventures. strategic objectives.
Capital Mismanagement (exploration projects) Employing and retaining experienced
technical talent.
Undisciplined expenditure on exploration projects.
Actively managing key deliverables and uncertainties
Exploration projects are speculative in nature and through strategic planning, budgeting, technical
often require substantial expenditure to establish the assessment and review.
presence of mineralisation.
Major Corporate Breach including Fraud Guided by our values and Code of Conduct,
Chalice aims to maintain a culture of accountability
Material breach of law or regulation causing and reporting through its risk management and
reputational damage and financial loss. governance systems, policies and procedures, with
the effective involvement of management.
Inappropriate, unethical or unlawful conduct of our
people. Providing mechanisms for reporting wrongdoing
and prompt action on misconduct through the
Whistleblower Policy.
Implementation of appropriate internal
financial controls.
Enhance training to maintain and improve our culture
and create a harassment free and ethical workplace.
Forfeiture of Key Tenements Maintaining a system of monitoring and
compliance with the aim of continually meeting key
Loss of title to key exploration tenements or licences tenement conditions.
may result in disruptions to operating performance
and significant financial loss.
Collapse of Equity / Financial Markets Maintain a strong financial position backed by an
appropriately executed Board approved strategy.
Unexpected changes in macroeconomic conditions.
Climate Change Developing a greenhouse gas management plan for
the Gonneville Project as part of the development
Physical risks approval process.
Impact on operations caused by extreme weather Commenced consultation with Western Power to
events and potentially constrained water supplies.
connect to the South West Interconnected System
Transition Risks for power supply.
Increasing government regulation resulting in Initiated consultation with the Water Corporation to
increased operating costs and constraints. secure a water supply from the Alkimos wastewater
treatment plant.
Constrained electricity supply resulting from transition
to renewable energy and increasing costs. Monitor regulatory and legislative developments
related to climate change and engage with
Availability and affordability of solutions for government entities and peak industry bodies to
decarbonising operations and the impact of carbon assess the implications of these changes.
pricing.
----- End of picture text -----
64 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Risks
Mitigating Actions
Adverse Change in Government Policies and Regulation
The Company is subject to a wide range of legal and regulatory requirements. Failure to manage adverse changes to laws, regulation and Government policy could negatively impact the Company’s operations or ability to action strategic objectives.
- Engage with Government and peak industry bodies to monitor and understand implications of regulatory changes to allow Chalice to anticipate and prepare for changes in the regulatory environment in which it operates.
Gonneville Project Does Not Meet Final Investment Decision Requirements
Inability to deliver a development project that meets Board defined final investment decision requirements and results in a project that is not viable due to factors such as permitting, environmental impacts, technical outcomes and financial feasibility.
Ensure disciplined approach to project evaluation through the attraction of appropriate capability and expertise.
Undertake studies to identify optimal infrastructure and processing options.
Complete environmental baseline studies and assessments.
Actively engage with stakeholders to facilitate obtaining the necessary permits, approvals and heritage management plans.
==> picture [548 x 385] intentionally omitted <==
| 65
==> picture [107 x 243] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Directors’ Report
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [298 x 758] intentionally omitted <==
66 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Directors’ Report
The Directors present their Directors’ Report for the financial year ended 30 June 2024 for the consolidated entity consisting of Chalice Mining Limited (“ Chalice ” or “ the Company ”) and its controlled entities (together “ the Group ”).
1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The names and details of Directors in office during the financial year and until the date of this report are:
CURRENT DIRECTORS
Derek N La Ferla
Non-Executive Chair
Appointed 1 October 2021 and Chair on 24 November 2021
Independence status:
Independent
Committee memberships:
-
« Remuneration and Nomination Committee (Chair)
-
« Audit Committee
-
« Risk & Sustainability Committee (since 31 August 2024)
Directorships of other listed entities:
In the past three years, Mr La Ferla has served as a Director of the following listed companies:
-
« Poseidon Nickel Limited (Chair) (December 2019 to October 2023)
-
« Sandfire Resources Limited (Chair) (May 2010 to July 2022)
-
« Threat Protect Australia Ltd (Chair) (September 2015 to September 2021)
Alexander (Alex) C Dorsch
Independence status:
Managing Director and Chief Not Independent Executive Officer (MD&CEO) Committee memberships: Appointed 13 November 2018 Technical Committee (Member)(until 7 December 2023)
Directorships of other listed entities:
In the past three years, Mr Dorsch has served as a Director of the following listed companies:
- « Falcon Metals Limited (since July 2021)
Garret J Dixon
Non-executive Director
Appointed 21 August 2020
Independence status:
Independent
Committee memberships:
-
« Risk & Sustainability Committee (Chair)
-
« Technical Committee
-
« Remuneration and Nomination Committee (since 31 August 2024)
-
« Audit Committee (Chair) (since 31 August 2024)
Directorships of other listed entities:
In the past three years, Mr Dixon has served as a Director of the following listed companies:
-
« BCI Minerals Limited (since June 2020)
-
« Dynamic Group Holdings Limited (from May 2020 to September 2024)
-
« MLG OZ Limited (since March 2021)
| 67
Stephen M McIntosh
Non-executive Director Appointed 20 February 2021
Independence status:
Independent
Committee memberships:
-
« Risk & Sustainability Committee (Member)
-
« Technical Committee (Chair)
-
« Remuneration and Nomination Committee (since 31 August 2024)
-
« Audit Committee (since 31 August 2024)
Directorships of other listed entities:
In the past three years, Mr McIntosh has served as a Director of the following listed companies:
None
FORMER DIRECTORS
Joanne (Jo) M Gaines
B.Arts, GradDip OHS Non-executive Director
Appointed 17 August 2022 Resigned 31 August 2024
Ms Gaines is an experienced, highly regarded leader and strategic policy director, having previously worked as the Deputy Chief of Staff to the Premier of Western Australia. She was a leader in the development of the WA Recovery Plan in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to this position, Jo served as Branch Assistant Secretary for the Community and Public Sector Union/Civil Service Association for over ten years.
Jo is currently Chair of the Government Employees Superannuation Board (GESB), Director of DevelopmentWA and a Non-executive Director of Australian Vanadium Limited (ASX:AVL). Jo is a graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
Independence status:
Independent
Committee memberships:
-
« Risk & Sustainability Committee (Member) (resigned 31 August 2024)
-
« Remuneration and Nomination Committee (Member) (resigned 31 August 2024)
-
« Audit Committee (Member) (from 31 March 2024) (resigned 31 August 2024)
Linda J Kenyon
LLB, B.Juris FGIA FCG
Non-executive Director
Appointed 24 August 2021 Resigned 31 August 2024
Ms Kenyon is a highly experienced corporate lawyer, governance professional and former senior executive with a career spanning 32 years at Wesfarmers Limited (ASX: WES).
Linda was a member of Wesfarmers Executive Leadership Team and was Wesfarmers’ Company Secretary for 17 years. During this time, she played a meaningful role in mergers and acquisitions, capital raisings and other significant commercial and property transactions.
Linda holds a Bachelor of Laws and Bachelor of Jurisprudence degrees from the University of Western Australia. Linda is a Fellow of the Governance Institute of Australia and a member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
Independence status:
Independent
Committee memberships:
-
« Risk & Sustainability Committee (Member) (Until 31 March 2024)
-
« Audit Committee (Chair) (Appointed Chair 31 March 2024) (resigned 31 August 2024)
-
« Remuneration and Nomination Committee (Member) (appointed 31 March 2024) (resigned 31 August 2024)
68 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Morgan S Ball
B.Com, CA, F Fin Non-executive Director Appointed 24 June 2016 Resigned 31 March 2024
Mr Ball is a Chartered Accountant with more than 30 years of Australian and international experience in the resources, logistics and finance industries. Mr Ball is currently the Chief Financial Officer for Genesis Minerals Limited (ASX: GMD). Mr Ball was formerly the Chief Financial Officer of ASX 50 gold producer, Northern Star Resources Limited (ASX: NST) and prior to that, the Chief Financial Officer of Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited (ASX: SAR). Mr Ball was Managing Director of ASX-listed BCI Minerals Ltd (ASX: BCI) from 2013 to 2016.
Independence status:
Independent
Committee memberships:
-
« Audit Committee (Chair) (resigned 31 March 2024)
-
« Remuneration and Nomination Committee (Member)(resigned 31 March 2024)
Details of the qualifications and experience of the Directors in office at the date of this report are set out on page 9 of this Annual Report.
Directors listed as Independent Non-Executive Directors have been independent throughout the period of their appointment.
2. COMPANY SECRETARY
Jamie Armes Mr Armes joined Chalice as Company Secretary in August 2019. For the B.Bus, CA past 20 years he has acted as Company Secretary and held finance roles in various ASX-listed companies, primarily within the mining and exploration industry providing corporate governance and financial reporting advice. Mr Armes is a Chartered Accountant and graduated from the University of Tasmania with a Bachelor of Business in 1993.
3. DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS
The relevant interests of each director in the shares, performance rights or options over such instruments issued by Chalice and other related bodies corporate, as notified by the directors to the ASX in accordance with S205G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 , at the date of this report is as follows:
| Derek La Ferla Alex Dorsch(1) |
Ordinary shares 34,561 5,999,447 |
Options over ordinary shares - - |
Performance rights - 383,512 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garret Dixon | 152,739 | - | - |
| Stephen McIntosh | 37,558 | - | - |
(1) In September 2024, the Board resolved, subject to shareholder approval at the Company’s 2024 AGM to offer 696,458 performance rights to Mr Dorsch or his nominee.
| 69
4. BOARD COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND MEMBERSHIP
Directors acting as members on the committees of the Board as at 30 June 2024 are set out below:
| Remuneration and | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit(1) | Risk & Sustainability(2) | Nomination(3) | Technical |
| Chair: | Chair: | Chair: | Chair: |
| Linda Kenyon | Garret Dixon | Derek La Ferla | Stephen McIntosh |
| Members: | Members: | Members: | Members: |
| Derek La Ferla | Stephen McIntosh | Linda Kenyon | Garret Dixon |
| Jo Gaines | Jo Gaines | Jo Gaines | Martin Reed(4) |
(1) On 31 August 2024, Ms Kenyon and Ms Gaines retired as members of the Audit Committee. Mr Dixon was appointed as Chair of the Audit Committee and Mr McIntosh was appointed as a member of the Audit Committee.
(2) On 31 August 2024, Ms Gaines retired as a member of the Risk & Sustainability Committee and Mr La Ferla was appointed as a member of the Risk & Sustainability Committee.
(3) On 31 August 2024, Ms Kenyon and Ms Gaines retired as members of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee. Mr Dixon and Mr McIntosh were appointed as members of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee.
(4) On 7 November 2023, Mr Martin Reed was appointed as a member of the Technical Committee. Mr Reed is not a Director of the Company.
Mr Reed is a highly experienced mining engineer and company director, with a career spanning 40+ years in globally recognised mining and resource companies throughout Australia and the Asia Pacific. Over this time he has been involved in developing underground and open pit mining operations from feasibility through to operation. Mr Reed was a Non-Executive Director and Study Manager for Saracen Mineral Holdings (ASX:SAR), and recently held the role of NonExecutive Director at Horizon Power. Previously, Mr Reed developed the greenfield DeGrussa Copper Gold Project as a Project Manager and COO at Sandfire Resources (ASX:SFR). He also served as COO and GM – Operations and Development at St Barbara Ltd (ASX:SBM) overseeing the Gwalia Gold Mine, and was a Construction Manager for the Ravensthorpe Nickel Mine at BHP. Mr Reed holds a B.Eng (Hons), PostGradDipMgmt and a Diploma from the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
Directors were members of a committee for the entire financial year ended 30 June 2024 unless otherwise noted in Section 5, Board and Committee Meetings.
70 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
5. BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The number of Board and committee meetings held during the financial year ended 30 June 2024 and the number of meetings attended by each of the Directors in office during the financial year is summarised in the table below:
| Derek La Ferla Alex Dorsch(2) Morgan Ball(3) Garret Dixon Stephen McIntosh |
Board Meetings Attended/Held(1) 7/7 7/7 4/5 7/7 7/7 |
Audit Attended/Held 2/2 2* 2/2 -/- -/- |
Committee Risk & Sustainability Attended/Held 1 2 -/- 2/2 2/2 |
Meetings Remuneration & Nomination Attended/Held 3/3 3* 1/1 -/- -/- |
Technical Attended/Held 1 5/3 -/- 5/5 5/5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Kenyon(4) | 7/7 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2* |
| Jo Gaines(5) | 7/7 | -/- | 2/2 | 3/3 | 2* |
| Martin Reed(6) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 3/3 |
(*) Indicates that a Director attended a Committee meeting by invitation where they are not a member of a specific Committee. Any Director may attend any Committee meeting even if they are not a member of the relevant Committee.
(1) The number of meetings held whilst the Director or Committee member was eligible to attend.
(2) Mr Dorsch retired as a member of the Technical Committee on 7 December 2023.
(3) Mr Ball retired as a Non-executive Director effective 31 March 2024.
(4) Ms Kenyon was appointed as Chair of the Audit Committee and retired as a member of the Risk and Sustainability Committee on 31 March 2024.
(5) Ms Gaines was appointed as a member of the Audit Committee on 31 March 2024.
(6) Mr Reed was appointed as a member of the Technical Committee on 7 November 2023. Mr Reed is a member of the Technical Committee only and is not a Director of the Company.
6. PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
The principal activities of the Group during the financial year was the exploration and evaluation of the Gonneville PGE-Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Project and the exploration of projects located in the West Yilgarn region of Western Australia.
In the opinion of the Directors, there were no significant changes to the principal activities of the Group during the financial year under review that are not otherwise disclosed in this report.
7. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
Please refer to pages 16 to 26 of this Annual Report for information on the Group with respect to a review of operations during the year ended 30 June 2024 and comments on the financial position, business strategies, likely developments and prospects for future financial years. An outline of the material business risks that may affect the Group are contained on pages 63 to 65 of this Annual Report.
8. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE OF AFFAIRS
Other than the matters disclosed in the Operating and Financial Review on pages 16 to 26 of this Annual Report and elsewhere in this Directors’ Report, there were no other significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company that occurred during the year.
| 71
9. REMUNERATION REPORT – AUDITED
The Directors present the Remuneration Report for the Company and its controlled entities for the year ended 30 June 2024 (FY2024). This Remuneration Report for the Group forms part of the Directors’ Report and has been prepared in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
9.1 Executive Summary
Since the initial discovery of the Gonneville PGE-Ni-Cu-Co deposit in March 2020, Chalice’s strategy has been to define and de-risk the optimal development pathway for the Gonneville Project, determine the full scale of the mineral system across the Julimar Complex and explore the wider West Yilgarn province. Chalice has also aimed to secure strategic partners for the Gonneville Project development whilst maintaining control and optionality.
The Board, with the assistance of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee, will continue to assess and refine the Group’s remuneration structure to ensure it aligns with shareholder interests and aids the achievement of the Company’s strategic objectives whilst remaining cognisant of the challenging commodity price environment currently being experienced.
FY2024 Short-term Incentive (STI) outcomes
The Board determined that 16.67% of the maximum STI award be paid to eligible employees, including Executive Key Management Personnel, (Executive KMP) based on performance measures set by the Board in July 2023. This assessment resulted in a total cash payment of $100,250 to Executive KMP in July 2024. Further information on the outcomes of the FY2024 STI are disclosed in section 9.4.7(b).
FY2024 Long-term Incentive (LTI) outcomes
In July 2024, performance rights issued in FY2021-22 with a measurement date of 30 June 2024, the Board determined that 20% of the performance rights be vested due to the achievement of performance conditions set by the Board and measured over the three-year performance period. This assessment resulted in a total of 63,484 performance rights vesting, based on realising the strategic objective of achieving inclusion in the S&P/ASX 200 ESG index. Further information on the outcomes of the FY2024 LTI are disclosed in section 9.4.8(c).
Executive KMP remuneration framework
For FY2024, the remuneration framework and remuneration mix for Executive KMP remained consistent with FY2023 other than the removal of long-term retention rights. The issue of long-term retention rights was a one-off initiative for FY2023, and was not a component of the remuneration mix for Executive KMP for FY2024.
Remuneration adjustments for Executive KMP
Following the completion of an internal benchmarking exercise derived from a comparator peer group, at the commencement of FY2024, the Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR) of Executive KMP was increased to reflect the increasing scale and complexity of the Company’s activities and to better align the TFR of Executive KMP with industry peers.
Effective from 1 February 2024, due to a deterioration in market conditions impacting the resources sector, particularly nickel and platinum group metals, the Company took decisive action to reduce expenditure to maintain its strong financial position. As a result of this expenditure review, and in conjunction with a rationalisation of the Company’s management structure, several Executive KMP agreed to a reduction in their TSR to preserve cash. Refer to section 9.4.6 for further information on Executive KMP TFR.
Changes to Non-executive Director fees
In July 2023, following the completion of an internal benchmarking exercise and recommendation from the Remuneration and Nomination Committee, the Board determined that from 1 July 2023, non-executive director fees would be increased to reflect both market rates of comparable organisations, market trends and the increasing time commitment required by the non-executive directors.
As part of the expenditure review referred to above, non-executive director fees were also reduced by 25%, effective 1 February 2024. Refer to section 9.5 for further information on Non-executive Director remuneration.
72 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
9.2 Key Management Personnel
This report discloses the FY2024 remuneration arrangements and outcomes for the people listed below, who are those individuals within the Company who have been determined to be Key Management Personnel (KMP) during the financial year to 30 June 2024. KMP are those people who have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing, and controlling the Group’s activities, either directly or indirectly.
| Name Executive KMP Alex Dorsch Mike Nelson Chris MacKinnon Kevin Frost(1) Soolim Carney Former Executive KMP |
Name Executive KMP Alex Dorsch Mike Nelson Chris MacKinnon Kevin Frost(1) Soolim Carney Former Executive KMP |
Position Managing Director and CEO (MD&CEO) General Manager – Project Development Chief Financial Officer General Manager – Exploration General Manager – Environment & Community |
Term Full year Full year Full year Full year Full year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Hacker(2) | General Manager – Strategy & Commercial | Part year - ceased 29 February 2024 | |
| Bruce Kendall | General Manager – Exploration | Part year – resigned 30 April 2024 | |
| Non-Executive Directors Derek La Ferla Non-executive Chair Garret Dixon Non-executive Director Jo Gaines Non-executive Director Linda Kenyon Non-executive Director Stephen McIntosh Non-executive Director Former Non-Executive Directors |
Full year Full year Full year Full year Full year |
||
| Morgan Ball | Non-executive Director | Partyear - resigned 31 March 2024 |
(1) Effective from 5 February 2024, Dr Frost assumed the role of General Manager – Exploration whilst Mr Kendall was on an extended period of leave. Dr Frost previously held the Executive KMP role, General Manager – Discovery and Growth.
(2) The Board carried out a review of Executive KMP in conjunction with an expenditure review announced 22 January 2024. As a result of this review, it was determined that as a consequence of a reallocation of responsibilities and authority, the role of Mr Hacker, as General Manager – Strategy and Commercial is no longer classified as Executive KMP, effective 29 February 2024.
Changes to KMP subsequent to year end
On 31 August 2024, Ms Kenyon and Ms Gaines retired as Non-executive Directors.
Effective 1 July 2024, as part of the Company’s continuing efforts to rationalise its organisational structure and operations, together with an associated reduction in delegated authority, the Board has determined that Dr Carney, General Manager – Environment & Community and Dr Frost, General Manager - Exploration will no longer be executives designated as KMP.
Other than disclosed above, there were no changes in KMP after the reporting date and before this financial report was authorised for issue.
9.3 Remuneration governance and decision making
9.3.1 Role of the Board
The Board is responsible for setting Chalice’s remuneration framework and remuneration policy to ensure that it is aligned with the Groups strategic objectives, values, and risk appetite. This includes approving the remuneration arrangements of Non-executive Directors, the MD&CEO, Executive KMP, and the approval of all performance targets set on awards of Short-term and Long-term incentives made to Executive KMP.
Under a formal charter, the Board has established a Remuneration and Nomination Committee (RNC) to assist the Board with the oversight of the Company’s Remuneration Policy and framework.
| 73
9.3.2 Remuneration and Nomination Committee
The RNC assists the Board with the Group’s remuneration policies and framework and is primarily responsible for the consideration and recommendation of remuneration practices in relation to Executive KMP as well as recommending the level of Non-executive Director fees.
The RNC comprises of three independent Non-executive Directors. Details on the composition of the RNC during the year ended 30 June 2024 is provided on page 70.
The responsibilities of the RNC, including its role, objectives and responsibilities are outlined in its charter, which is available at www.chalicemining.com/about-us/corporate-governance/. These responsibilities include:
-
« Regularly reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the Remuneration Policy, the remuneration of Executive KMP and Non-executive Directors;
-
« The implementation and oversight of the operation of equity incentive plans and other incentive plans; and
-
« The engagement of external remuneration consultants in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Details of the number of times the RNC met and attendance at those meetings during FY2024 is set out in the Directors’ Report on page 71.
The MD&CEO attends RNC meetings by invitation to provide management input where required, however, the MD&CEO has no vote in relation to matters before the Committee. The MD&CEO provides recommendations to the RNC on the remuneration arrangements of his direct reports and all other employees. The RNC has implemented processes to ensure conflicts of interest are managed appropriately.
9.3.3 Use of remuneration consultants
To assist the RNC when making remuneration decisions and recommendations to the Board, the RNC may seek external advice on remuneration policies and practices. Remuneration consultants engaged by the RNC report directly to the RNC. In selecting remuneration consultants, the RNC considers potential conflicts of interest and independence from the Group’s KMP.
No remuneration consultants were engaged during FY2024 and no remuneration recommendations as defined by the Corporations Act were received during the year.
9.3.4 Remuneration Report approval at 2023 Annual General Meeting (AGM)
The Remuneration Report for the financial year ended 30 June 2023 received positive shareholder support at the 2023 AGM with a vote of 98.05% in favour. The Company received no specific feedback on its Remuneration Report at the 2023 AGM.
9.3.5 Securities Trading Policy
All KMP and employees of Chalice are subject to the Company’s Securities Trading Policy which sets out the governance approach for dealing in the Company’s securities including when and how KMP and employees - - can deal in the Company securities. A copy is available at www.chalicemining.com/about us/corporate governance/.
9.4 Executive KMP remuneration for FY2024
9.4.1 Policy & Approach
For FY2024, the Company adopted the following principles in its remuneration framework for Executive KMP:
-
« Setting total aggregate remuneration at a level which provides the Company with the ability to attract, retain and motivate Executive KMP of a high calibre and drives a positive culture that achieves the Company’s business objectives;
-
« Align Executive KMP remuneration outcomes with the interests of key stakeholders by incorporating in the remuneration framework variable remuneration consisting of short and long-term incentives linked to the strategic goals and performance of the Company;
74 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
-
« Ensure Executive KMP are appropriately remunerated for their role having regard to the remuneration of comparable positions in comparable organisations; and
-
« Structure remuneration in a manner that is consistent with and promotes adherence to the Group’s values, policies and procedures.
9.4.2 Alignment of Remuneration Framework to the Strategic Objectives
Included on page 13 of this Annual Report are the Company’s strategic objectives. These strategic objectives are summarised as:
-
« Generate New Discoveries
-
« Define New Resources
-
« De-risk Development
-
« Develop our Business and Market
-
« Fund the Strategy and Protect our Data
-
« Focus on People and Stakeholders
The Board has developed a remuneration framework that reflects a desire to maintain the Company’s strong discovery culture through exploration, whilst also building capabilities to support the evaluation of the Gonneville Project with the ultimate aim of transitioning to mine developer. The remuneration framework aims to link the remuneration outcomes for Executive KMP to the achievement of these objectives in driving long term value creation for shareholders.
9.4.3 Overview of FY2024 Remuneration Framework
The following table provides an overview of the elements of the FY2024 remuneration framework for Executive KMP:
| Element | Purpose | Section | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Fixed Remuneration(TFR) | |||
| Comprises of a cash salary, superannuation | Provides a competitive cash salary, determined by | 9.4.6 | |
| and non-monetary benefits. | the scope of the role and benchmarked to ensure it | ||
| Variable Remuneration Short Term Incentives(STI) Annual incentive opportunity paid FY2024. |
in cash for | remains competitive to attract and retain required capability. Rewards performance in executing the 12-month strategic priorities of the Company. |
9.4.7 |
| Long Term Incentive(LTI) | |||
| Granted as Performance Rights vesting over | To reward longer term performance and |
9.4.8 | |
| a three-year period upon |
meeting | achievement of strategic objectives aligned with | |
| performance objectives. | shareholder interests. |
Changes to the Remuneration Framework for the Financial Year ended 30 June 2025 (FY2025)
The Board has completed a review of the Executive KMP remuneration framework for FY2025 and as part of the Company’s commitment to driving sustainable growth, conserving cash and maximising long-term shareholder value, the Board has made the following key changes to the elements of the FY2025 remuneration framework for Executive KMP:
-
« no significant changes in Executive KMP TFR, other than an increase to reflect the statutory increase in superannuation from 11% to 11.5%. Refer to section 9.4.6 for further details.
-
« no cash based STI will be awarded in favour of increasing the emphasis on the LTI. This ensures Chalice’s financial strength is maintained, employees are closely aligned with shareholders and employees focus on long-term strategic priorities.
-
« the remuneration mix for Executive KMP has been adjusted by increasing the LTI component, in-lieu of the STI. Refer to section 9.4.4 for further details.
| 75
9.4.4 Remuneration mix
The tables below demonstrate the remuneration mix for Executive KMP when maximum incentive opportunities are achieved and the “at risk” elements as a proportion of TSR.
For FY2024, the remuneration mix for Executive KMP remained weighted toward “at risk” elements aligning with Chalice’s short-term goals and longer-term strategic objectives that were developed with the aim of driving value creation for shareholders. In determining the remuneration mix for Executive KMP, greater emphasis was placed on long-term incentives reflecting the expected timeframes required to achieve the strategic objectives of the Company.
The retention plan implemented in FY2023 was not repeated in FY2024 (refer to section 9.4.9 for further details).
Changes to Remuneration Mix for FY2025
As noted previously, for FY2025, the cash based STI previously awarded to Executive KMP will not be utilised in favour of increasing the emphasis on the Company’s longer term strategic objectives encompassed in the LTI. Consequently, the remuneration mix for Executive KMP has been adjusted by increasing the LTI component. The increase in LTI has also been implemented to compensate Executive KMP for TFR reductions accepted in January 2024.
(a) Maximum Incentive Opportunities as a Percentage of Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR) are set out in the table below:
| FY2025 | FY2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STI | LTI | STI | LTI | |||
| % of TFR | % of TFR | % of TFR | % of TFR | |||
| MD&CEO | Nil | 200 | 25 | 175 | ||
| Other Executive KMP(1) | Nil | 150 | 25 | 95 |
(1) Mr Nelson was appointed on 1 February 2023. Under the Remuneration Policy, Executive KMP that commence after 1 October, may have their incentive opportunities for the following year increased by a pro-rata amount based on the date of their commencement. For FY2024 the maximum STI opportunity for Mr Nelson was 35.2%.
- (b) Remuneration mix based on maximum incentive opportunity
| FY2025 | FY2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFR | STI | LTI | TFR | STI | LTI | |
| % | % | % | % | % | % | |
| MD&CEO | 33 | Nil | 67 | 33 | 8 | 58 |
| Other Executive KMP(1) | 40 | Nil | 60 | 45 | 11 | 43 |
(1) For FY2024, the remuneration mix for Mr Nelson differed from Other Executive KMP due to a pro-rata increase in the maximum STI opportunity. For FY2024 the remuneration mix based on the maximum incentive opportunity for Mr Nelson was TFR 43%, STI 15% and LTI 41%.
9.4.5 Link between performance and Executive KMP remuneration
The short-term and long-term incentive plans offered to Executive KMP in FY2024 were designed to provide a direct link between remuneration outcomes and Company performance over the short-term (12 months) and long-term (3 years).
The following table provides a summary of key financial metrics for the Company for 30 June 2024 and the previous five financial years. As the Company does not yet generate revenues, achievement of strategic objectives, long-term Company share price performance and TSR are considered to be the most appropriate metric with which to link performance to remuneration.
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share price at 30 June | $0.995 | $7.42 | $3.78 | $6.26 | $1.42 |
| Change in share price during period | 729% | 646% | (49%) | 66% | (77%) |
| Market capitalisation | $302m | $2,574m | $1,405m | $2,422m | $552m |
| Long term - 3 Year TSR to 30 June | 756% | 6,283% | 3,050% | 539% | (80%) |
| Loss after Income Tax($‘000) | $2,659 | $43,193 | $18,305 | $65,602 | $39,498 |
76 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
9.4.6 Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR)
TFR comprises cash salary including statutory superannuation. The level of TFR is set to provide a base level of remuneration which is both appropriate for the position and competitive in the market. The Company aims to set TFR in accordance with market rates. However, the Board may use its discretion to pay above this to attract and retain key employees to achieve the Company’s strategic goals. TFR is reviewed on no less than an annual basis by the RNC and approved by the Board, having regard to the Company, individual performance, and the remuneration paid for similar positions by comparable companies in the mining industry. No guaranteed TFR increases are provided to Executive KMP.
For FY2024, the RNC and Board reviewed the remuneration of Executive KMP having regard to the increasing scale and complexity of the Company’s activities and internally generated benchmark information derived from a comparator group consisting of producing and development companies within the mining industry. The comparator group selected reflected where executive talent may be “recruited from” or “lost to”.
In January 2024, due to a deterioration in market conditions impacting the resources sector, particularly nickel and platinum group metals, the Company took decisive action to minimise expenditure in order to maintain its strong financial position. As a result of this expenditure review, and in conjunction with a rationalisation of the Company’s management structure, several Executive KMP agreed to a reduction in their TSR to preserve the Company’s cash. The reductions to Executive KMP TFR were effective from 1 February 2024.
Changes to TFR for FY2025
In June 2024, the RNC, reviewed the remuneration of Executive KMP having regard to internally generated benchmark information derived from a comparator group consisting of development companies within the mining industry. As a result of this review and consistent with the Company’s focus on conserving cash, effective 1 July 2024, no increases in Executive KMP TFR were made, other than to reflect the statutory increase in superannuation from 11% to 11.5%.
The following table presents the outcomes to Executive KMP TFR, inclusive of superannuation, as a consequence of the reviews outlined above:
| From 1 July 2024 | From 1 February 2024 | From 1 July 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Name Executive KMP Alex Dorsch Mike Nelson Chris MacKinnon |
$ 504,932 404,932 329,932 |
$ 502,399 402,399 327,399 |
$ 600,000 482,172 350,000 |
| Kevin Frost | 329,932 | 327,399 | 370,000 |
| Soolim Carney | 372,233 | 370,000 | 370,000 |
| Former Executive KMP | |||
| Richard Hacker(1) Bruce Kendall(2) |
N/A N/A |
346,283 370,000 |
370,000 370,000 |
(1) Mr Hacker ceased to act as Executive KMP from 29 February 2024.
(2) Mr Kendall resigned as General Manager – Exploration on 30 April 2024
| 77
9.4.7 Short Term Incentive (STI) Plan
(a) Key questions and answers on how the STI Plan works
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Why did the Board | The purpose of the STI Plan is to make a proportion of the total remuneration package |
| consider a STI Plan | subject to meeting various short-term, non-financial performance measures that are |
| is appropriate? | aligned with Chalice’s strategic plan, thereby strengthening the link to remuneration and |
| Company performance. | |
| For FY2025, no cash based STI will be awarded in favour of increasing the emphasis on the | |
| LTI. This ensures Chalice’s financial strength is maintained, employees are closely aligned | |
| with shareholders and focused on long-term strategic priorities. | |
| How is it paid? | For FY2024, STI awards for Executive KMP were paid in cash according to the extent of |
| achievement of the applicable performance measures. There is no re-testing of | |
| performance measures after the measurement date. | |
| What is the | STI awards are assessed over a 12-month period aligned with the Company’s financial year. |
| performance | |
| period? | |
| How much can the | For FY2024, the maximum STI opportunity as a percentage of TFR for the MD&CEO and other |
| Executive KMP | Executive KMP was 25% (except Mr Nelson being 35.2%, as a result of a pro-rata adjustment |
| earn? | due to his date of commencement). If performance against any measurement objective is |
| assessed as not being met or below threshold, subject to the discretion of the Board, no | |
| outcome is awarded for that measure. The determination as to whether the performance | |
| measures have been met by the Company and the calculation of the amount payable | |
| under the STI Plan is at the absolute discretion of the Board. | |
| How is | Performance measures include Group KPIs which are aligned to the Group’s strategic plan |
| performance | and values. The Board, with the assistance of the RNC sets and assesses achievement of |
| assessed? | each performance measure as at the end of the financial year. |
| What were the | Performance measures for the MD & CEO include those relating to exploration objectives |
| performance | (weighting 40%), project definition objectives (weighting 10%), project development and |
| measures for | project approval objectives (weighting 20%), and commercial objectives (weighting 30%). |
| FY2024? | The STI award calculated after assessing the performance measures is subject to a potential |
| reduction (downward scaling factors) of up to 50% for breaches of certain sustainability | |
| criteria (health, safety, environment, and community). The Board retains discretion to adjust | |
| downwards by up to 100% any STI award in the event of a major or catastrophic | |
| consequence safety incident. | |
| The performance period for the FY2024 STI is the financial year ending 30 June 2024. | |
| Outcomes of the FY2024 STI are disclosed in section 9.4.7(b)below. | |
| Who is eligible to | All Executive KMP are eligible to participate in the STI Plan. All permanent and fixed term |
| participate in the | employees of Chalice are also eligible to participate. |
| STI Plan? | |
| What happens to | Subject to the discretion of the Board, Executive KMP must be an employee of Chalice at |
| STI awards when an | the end of the performance period on 30 June each year to remain eligible. |
| Executive ceases | |
| employment? |
78 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
(b) STI Performance and Outcomes for FY2024
The Board determined that 16.67% of the maximum FY2024 STI award be paid to Executive KMP (including the MD&CEO). The following table sets out the actual STI outcomes (inclusive of superannuation) for each Executive KMP for the year ended 30 June 2024.
| Maximum STI Opportunity |
Actual STI Outcome Cash STI Outcome |
|---|---|
| Name (% of TFR) |
(% of maximum) (% of TFR) $ |
| Alex Dorsch 25 Mike Nelson(1) 35.2 Chris MacKinnon 25 Kevin Frost 25 Soolim Carney 25 Former Executive KMP Richard Hacker 25 |
16.67 5 23,309 16.67 6 23,966 16.67 4 14,194 16.67 4 14,671 16.67 4 15,420 16.67 6 8,690 |
(1) Mr Nelson was appointed on 1 February 2023. Under the Remuneration Policy, Executive KMP that commence after 1 October, may have their incentive opportunities for the following year increased by a pro-rata amount based on the date of their commencement. For FY2024 the maximum STI opportunity for Mr Nelson was 35.2%
Below is a summary of the basis for determining the FY2024 STI outcome for the performance period 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024, including commentary on achievements versus performance measures and the award percentage.
FY2024 STI Objective and Target
Outcome and Commentary on Performance
1. Exploration
(Max. weighting: 15%) 0% awarded Make at least one new discovery (excluding and discontinuous It was determined that no new discovery to known Gonneville-Hooley-Dampier deposits) which is discontinuous to the Gonneville-Hooleyreportable according to the DMIRS ‘Reporting Mineral Dampier deposits was made during the Discoveries (Minerals of Economic Interest) – Guidance Note’. performance period. (Max. weighting: 25%) 0% awarded Make at least one material new discovery (excluding and It was determined that neither a new discontinuous to the known Gonneville deposit but including a material discovery outside of Gonneville or new discovery which satisfies goal 1 above or upgrading Hooley Hooley was upgraded to a material to be a material discovery) which shows the potential to be discovery during the performance period. economic based on Board approved assumptions. In assessing materiality of a discovery, the Board shall consider this in context to the Company’s market capitalisation and/or existing resource base.
2. Exploration
3. Development
(Max. weighting: 10%)
0% awarded
Increase Gonneville MRE3 (March 2023 >0.6% NiEq cut-off) It was determined that neither the nickel resource average grade predicted metallurgical nickel recovery objective or the economic recoveries by a factor of 10%, demonstrated through test work, hydrometallurgical process flowsheet without significantly impacting estimated operating objective were achieved at 30 June 2024. expenditures.
OR
Develop a hydrometallurgical process flowsheet which has the potential to be economic based on piloting and Board approved assumptions, for nickel concentrate enrichment.
| 79
| FY2024 STI Objective and Target | Outcome and Commentary on Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| 4. | Development | |
| (Max. weighting: 10%) | 6.67% awarded | |
| Secure Lead Agency Status from WA State Government for the | The WA State Government did not grant Lead | |
| Julimar Project. | Agency Status for the Gonneville Project until | |
| AND | September 2024. | |
| Refer the Gonneville starter mine for major environmental approvals. AND |
The referral of the Gonneville Project for environmental approvals was submitted on 31 March 2024. |
|
| Secure approval of CMP3 for exploration drilling along entire Julimar Complex within the Julimar State Forest. |
Approval of CMP3 for drilling of the remainder of the Julimar Complex within the Julimar State Forest was announced to the ASX on 6 |
|
| December 2023. | ||
| Whilst only two of the three objectives where | ||
| achieved, in recognition of the achievement | ||
| of two material objectives that were |
||
| acknowledged to be within the control of the | ||
| Company, the Board exercised it discretion | ||
| and determined that a pro rata of 6.67% be | ||
| awarded. | ||
| 5. | Development | |
| (Max. weighting: 10%) | 10% awarded | |
| Develop a technically feasible solution for all the key | Technically feasible solutions have been | |
| infrastructure requirements for the Gonneville development, | demonstrated for a number of key |
|
| including: | infrastructure requirements, including, water, | |
| « Water |
power and logistics to a sufficient level for inclusion in the referral of the Gonneville |
|
| « Power |
Project for environmental approvals that was | |
| « Logistics |
submitted on 31 March 2024 and the scoping | |
| study lodged with the ASX on 29 August 2023. | ||
| 6. | Development | |
| (Max. weighting: 30%) | 0% awarded | |
| Secure formal involvement (through JV, equity or strategic | It was determined that this objective was not | |
| alliance)of a strategicpartner in the Gonneville Project. | achieved by30 June 2024. | |
| 7. | Sustainability Measures Modifier | 0% downward modifier |
| The FY2024 STI incorporated a Sustainability Measures modifier that allows the Board to adjust the FY2024 STI award downwards by up to 100% if specified Sustainability objectives are not met. |
The Board assessed the company-wide sustainability performance metrics and determined that there were no breaches |
|
| Health & Safety Measure | requiring a downward scaling factor to be | |
| « A major or catastrophic consequence safety incident (i.e. |
applied to the FY2024 STI award. | |
| permanent disability or death.) Potential downward scaling | ||
| factor of 50-100%. | ||
| « A high potential safety ‘near miss’ caused by a safety system |
||
| failure. Potential downward scaling factor of 0-20%. | ||
| « A lost time injury that resulted in greater than 2 weeks of |
||
| impact. Potential downward scaling factor of 5%. | ||
| Environmental Measure | ||
| « A reportable environmental incident that results in a statutory |
||
| reporting requirement (including spills, loss of containment, | ||
| etc.) Potential downward scaling factor of 5%. | ||
| Social | ||
| « A material breach of any Programme of Work or tenement |
||
| condition. Potential downward scaling factor of 30%. | ||
| « An incident or dispute resulting in the permanent loss of land |
||
| access on a material property or the immediate halting of all | ||
| operations on any site. Potential downward scaling factor of | ||
| 15%. |
80 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
9.4.8 Long Term Incentive (LTI) Plan
(a) Key questions and answers on how the LTI Plan works
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Why does the Board | The Board believes that a LTI Plan which is designed to be aligned to the strategic |
| consider a LTI Plan is | objectives of the Company can drive performance and optimise long term |
| appropriate? | shareholder value. An effective LTI Plan can create an immediate ownership mindset |
| among Executive KMP participants, linking a substantial portion of potential reward to | |
| Chalice’s share price and returns to shareholders. The award of LTI’s is an important | |
| component of remuneration to attract and retain the talented Executive KMP in a | |
| highly competitive market. | |
| How is the LTI award | LTI awards are delivered in performance rights, granted for no consideration to |
| delivered? | Executive KMP in accordance with the Company’s Employee Securities Incentive Plan |
| (“Plan”). Each performance right is exercisable into a fully paid ordinary share for no | |
| consideration if performance measures as set by the Board are met i.e., the | |
| performance rights vest. If the performance measures are not met by the | |
| measurement date, which is 3 years from the date of the commencement of the | |
| performance period, the performance rights are forfeited with no ordinary shares | |
| being issued. There is no re-testing of performance measures after the measurement | |
| date. | |
| Who is eligible to | All Executive KMP, full-time employees and permanent part-time employees |
| participate in the LTI Plan? | (including executive directors) of the Company are eligible participants. Shareholder |
| approval is required before any director or their related party can participate. It is the | |
| policy of the Company that Non-executive Directors are not awarded performance | |
| rights under the LTI Plan. | |
| How many Performance | The Board has the discretion to make annual awards of performance rights with the |
| Rights are issued to | level of the award dependent on an Executive KMP’s position within the Company |
| Executive KMP? | and their TFR. The number of performance rights issued is determined by dividing the |
| Executive KMP’s LTI opportunity (calculated as a percentage of TFR) by the 20-day | |
| volume weighted average price prior to the first trading day of the performance | |
| period. For FY2024, the MD&CEO received performance rights valued at 175% of TFR | |
| and other Executive KMP received performance rights valued at 95% of TFR. | |
| For FY2025, the MD&CEO has been offered performance rights equal to 200% of TFR, | |
| subject to shareholder approval and other Executive KMP have received | |
| performance rights equal to 150% of TFR. | |
| What is the performance | 3 years – for example, the issue of FY2024 performance rights have a performance |
| period? | period commencing on 1 July 2023, with a measurement date of 30 June 2026, being |
| the date at which the Board will determine if the performance measures are met. | |
| How is performance | Performance measures include Group KPIs which are aligned to the Group’s strategic |
| assessed? | plan and values. Performance measures typically include a mixture of measures linked |
| to key strategic objectives, Absolute total shareholder return (ATSR) and Relative total | |
| shareholder return (RTSR) share price performance measures. The Board, with the | |
| assistance of the RNC sets and assesses achievement of each KPI at the measurement | |
| date. | |
| What are the performance | Refer to 9.4.8(c) for the FY2021-22 tranche |
| measures for the | Refer to 9.4.8(d) for the FY2022-23 tranche |
| performance rights? | Refer to 9.4.8(e) for the FY2023-24 tranche |
| Refer to 9.4.8(f)for the FY2024-25 tranche | |
| What is the expiry date of | From 1 July 2024, performance rights expire 6 years from the commencement date of |
| the performance rights? | the performance period. Performance rights currently on issue and granted prior to 1 |
| July 2024, expire 5 years from the commencement date of the performance period. |
| 81
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What is ATSR and how is it | ATSR is a method of calculating the return shareholders would earn if they held a |
| measured? | notional number of shares over the performance period based on a 20-day VWAP |
| prior to the measurement date. TSR measures the growth in the company’s share price | |
| together with the value of the dividends during the performance period, assuming all | |
| dividends are re-invested into new shares. For the FY2023-24 Performance Rights, with | |
| a 3-year performance period, a maximum 20% of the total tranche of performance | |
| rights issued to Executive KMP will be measured against the ATSR performance criteria. | |
| For the FY2024-25 Performance Rights the maximum amount that will be measured | |
| against the ATSR performance criteria has been increased to 30% of the total tranche | |
| of performance rights issued to Executive KMP. The increase in weighting to the ATSR | |
| objective reinforces the direct alignment between vesting outcomes and the | |
| shareholder experience. This higher weighting has been undertaken in conjunction | |
| with increasing the ATSR outcome required to attain the maximum weighting from | |
| 72.8% to 119.7% over the three-year performance period. | |
| What is RTSR and how is it | RTSR is a method for calculating the return shareholders would earn if they held a |
| measured? | notional number of shares over the performance period measured against a |
| comparator group based on a 20-day VWAP at the measurement date. TSR measures | |
| the growth in a company’s share price together with the value of dividends during the | |
| period, assuming that all of those dividends are re-invested into new shares. | |
| For the FY2023-24 Performance Rights, with a 3-year performance period, a maximum | |
| of 40% of the total tranche of performance rights issued to Executive KMP will be | |
| measured against RTSR performance criteria using the ASX300 Metals and Mining | |
| Index as a comparator group. | |
| For the FY2024-25 Performance Rights the maximum amount that will be measured | |
| against the RTSR performance criteria has been decreased to 30% of the total tranche | |
| of performance rights issued to Executive KMP. This decrease in weighting creates an | |
| equal balance between RTSR and ATSR objectives, increasing shareholder alignment | |
| and encouraging management to focus on and be rewarded for absolute value | |
| growth. Despite the reduced weighting, RTSR still retains significant importance, | |
| ensuring a balanced approach that assesses management’s performance relative to | |
| the Company’s performance against the ASX300 Metals and Mining Index. | |
| For FY2023 onwards, why | The ASX300 Metals and Mining Index includes a diverse group of resource companies |
| is the ASX300 Metals and | against which Chalice’s share price performance can be appropriately |
| Mining Index an | benchmarked. Benchmarking against numerous comparable companies within the |
| appropriate comparator | index minimises the impact of fluctuations in commodity prices to illustrate how |
| comparing RTSR? | effective management have been in creatingvalue from the Group’s assets. |
| Is there a deferral | There is currently no deferral mechanism applied to vested performance rights. |
| mechanism? | |
| What happens to | Unvested performance rights will automatically be forfeited by the participant, unless |
| performance rights when | the Board uses discretion to permit some or all of the performance rights to vest or to |
| an Executive KMP ceases | allow the participant to hold the LTI award to be tested against performance |
| employment? | conditions at the end of the performance period. Examples of the circumstances |
| when the Board may decide to exercise its discretion includes where a participant | |
| becomes a leaver due to death, redundancy, permanent disability, mental | |
| incapacity, or retirement. | |
| What happens in the | If a change of control event occurs in relation to the Company, or the Board |
| event of a change of | determines that such an event is likely to occur, the Board may in its discretion |
| control? | determine the manner in which any or all of the participant's performance rights will |
| be dealt with, including, without limitation, allowing the participant to participate in | |
| and/or benefit from any transaction arising from the change of control event. | |
| Are there malus or | Where the Board determines that a participant has acted fraudulently or dishonestly; |
| clawback provisions? | or wilfully breached his or her duties to the Group, the Board may in its discretion deem |
| all unvested convertible securities held by that participant to have been forfeited. The | |
| Plan rules do not allow the forfeiture of vested convertible securities. | |
| Can the Board use its | Where required, the Board may, acting reasonably and in good faith, use its discretion |
| discretion to vary the | to vary the LTI maximum weightings and allocate the attributable weightings to other |
| maximum weightings? | milestones. |
82 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
(b) Summary of LTI Performance Rights Issued to Executive KMP
| Series | Issue date | Measurement date | Expiry date | Status | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2021-22 | 23 September 2021 | 30 June 2024 | 30 June 2026 | Assessed at 30 June | 9.4.8(c) |
| FY2022-23 FY2023-24 FY2024-25 |
24 November 2021 (MD&CEO) 5 September 2022 23 November 2022 (MD&CEO) 1 February2023 30 August 2023 23 November 2023 (MD&CEO) 20 February2024 26 September 2024 |
30 June 2025 30 June 2026 30 June 2027 |
30 June 2027 30 June 2028 30 June 2030 |
2024. 20% vested in FY2025 Issued – not yet tested Issued – not yet tested Issued – not yet tested |
9.4.8(d) 9.4.8(e) 9.4.8(f) |
(c) LTI Performance Outcomes - FY2021-22 Performance Rights
| Summary of Terms | |
|---|---|
| Financial Year of Issue | 30 June 2022 |
| Performance Period Award Opportunity Status |
3 years (1 July 2021 – 30 June 2024) MD&CEO - 100% of TFR Other Executive KMP –75% of TFR Tested in July 2024 at the measurement date of 30 June 2024, with 20% vesting. |
The table below outlines the FY2021-21 performance rights granted to Executive KMP. In July 2024, the Board, following a recommendation from the RNC determined that 20% of the FY2021-22 performance rights vested due to the achievement of the performance conditions measured over the three years ended 30 June 2024.
The vested performance rights can be exercised into an equivalent number of fully paid ordinary shares in accordance with their terms prior to their expiry date. All unvested FY2021-22 Performance Rights were forfeited.
The table below outlines the FY2021-22 performance rights granted to Executive KMP:
| Series FY2021-22 |
KMP Alex Dorsch Chris MacKinnon(1) Kevin Frost Soolim Carney |
Number of Rights 65,531 15,415 34,404 50,895 |
Number of Rights Vested 13,106 3,083 6,880 10,179 |
Measurement Date 30 June 2024 30 June 2024 30 June 2024 30 June 2024 |
Expiry date 30 June 2026 30 June 2026 30 June 2026 30 June 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Former Executive KMP | 30 June 2024 | 30 June 2026 | |||
| Richard Hacker | 34,404 | 6,880 | 30 June 2024 | 30 June 2026 | |
| Bruce Kendall(2) | 34,404 | 6,880 | 30 June 2024 | 30 June 2026 |
(1) Performance rights issued to Mr MacKinnon prior to becoming Executive KMP upon his appointment as CFO on 16 March 2023.
(2) Mr Kendall resigned on 30 April 2024, the Board exercised its discretion to allow Mr Kendal to retain the FY2021-22 Performance Rights under the “good leaver” provisions of the Employee Securities Incentive Plan.
| 83
The following table outlines for the FY2021-22 Performance Rights, the key performance conditions, the weightings of each performance condition and the outcome assessed for the performance period from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2024, including commentary on achievements versus performance measures and the award percentage:
| No. | FY2021-22 Performance Conditions and Weightings | Outcome and Commentary on Performance | Outcome and Commentary on Performance | Outcome and Commentary on Performance | Outcome and Commentary on Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Sustainability | Outcome: 20% awarded | |||
| (Max. weighting 20%) | On 9 December 2023, S&P Global notified | ||||
| Achieve inclusion into the S&P/ASX 200 ESG Index by 30 June 2024. | the Company that |
it | became | a | |
| constituent of the S&P | Dow Jones | ||||
| Sustainability Index Australia. The index | |||||
| represents the top 30% | of | companies | in | ||
| the S&P/ASX 200 based | on long-term | ||||
| economic, environmental, and social | |||||
| criteria. | |||||
| 2. | Generative Exploration, Project Definition and Strategic | Outcome: 0% awarded | |||
| (Max. weighting 30%) | None of the strategic | objectives were | |||
| Generate significant value, on an existing or new asset (either | achieved to a level that exceeded the | ||||
| operated or non-operated), through the achievement of several | stretch targets as set by | the Board. | |||
| strategic objectives that exceed stretch targets, pre-determined | |||||
| by the Board by resolution on 16 August 2021, including: | |||||
| « Define a new, material JORC Mineral Resources (excluding | |||||
| Gonneville) which show the potential to be economic; | |||||
| « Increase materially an existing JORC Mineral Resource; | |||||
| « Define JORC Mineral Reserves or a material increase in JORC | |||||
| Mineral Reserves; and | |||||
| « Disposal of a material asset (as part of an asset sale, joint | |||||
| venture or corporate transaction). | |||||
| 3. | Absolute TSR measure (Max. weighting 25%) | Outcome: 0% awarded | |||
| A proportional LTI payment shall be made which is directly | Absolute TSR hurdle was | not achieved. | |||
| proportional to the Total Shareholder Return (TSR) from 1 July 2021 | The Company achieved | a 3-yr TSR | of | ||
| to 30 June 2024. The proportion paid is calculated as: | (80%). | ||||
| « If 3-yr TSR <10% p.a (equivalent to <33.1% increase in share price) | |||||
| – 0% | |||||
| « If 3-yr TSR between 10-20% p.a (equivalent to 33.1-72.8% | |||||
| increase in share price) - weighting pro-rata between 5-25% | |||||
| « If 3-yr TSR >20% p.a (equivalent to >72.8% increase in share price) | |||||
| – weighting 25% | |||||
| 4. | Relative TSR compared to peer group. (Max. weighting 25%) | Outcome: 0% awarded | |||
| A proportional LTI payment shall be made where the TSR exceeds | Relative TSR hurdle was not achieved. | ||||
| the median TSR of the peer group, between 1 July 2021 and 30 | The Company achieved a | relative TSR | at | ||
| June 2024. The proportion paid is calculated as: | the 8thpercentile. | ||||
| « If TSR <50th percentile – 0% | |||||
| « If TSR between 50th and 75th percentile - weighting pro-rata | |||||
| between 5-25% | |||||
| « If TSR >75th percentile – weighting 25% | |||||
| As an illustrative example: If the TSR is at the 65th percentile, 17% of | |||||
| the performance measure would be deemed to have been met – | |||||
| calculated as (((65%-50%)/(75%-50%))x(25%-5%))+5% | |||||
| The comparators companies include the following ASX-listed | |||||
| companies: Pilbara Minerals Limited, Zimplats Holding Limited, | |||||
| Allkem, Brockman Mining Limited, De Grey Mining Limited, Perseus | |||||
| Mining Limited, Piedmont Lithium Limited, Oceanagold |
|||||
| Corporation, Ramelius Resources Limited, Sandfire Resources NL, | |||||
| Gold Road Resources Limited, Mount Gibson Iron Limited. |
84 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
(d) FY2023 LTI - Performance Rights FY2022-23
| Summary of Terms | |
|---|---|
| Financial Year of Issue | 30 June 2023 |
| Performance Period Award Opportunity Status |
3 years (1 July 2022 – 30 June 2025) MD&CEO - 175% of TFR Other Executive KMP – 44% to 95% of TFR Not yet tested or vested |
The table below outlines the FY2022-23 performance rights held by Executive KMP.
| Series | KMP Alex Dorsch Mike Nelson Chris MacKinnon(1) |
Number of Rights 228,938 121,775 43,168 |
Measurement Date 30 June 2025 30 June 2025 30 June 2025 |
Expiry date 30 June 2027 30 June 2027 30 June 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2022-23 | Kevin Frost | 79,118 | 30 June 2025 | 30 June 2027 |
| Soolim Carney | 73,652 | 30 June 2025 | 30 June 2027 | |
| Former Executive KMP | ||||
| Richard Hacker | 86,997 | 30 June 2025 | 30 June 2027 |
(1) Performance rights issued to Mr MacKinnon prior to becoming Executive KMP upon his appointment as CFO on 16 March 2023.
The following table outlines key business objectives and the weightings of the performance conditions:
-
No. FY2022-23 Performance Conditions and Weightings 1. Generative Exploration, Project Definition, Pre-development and Strategic (Max. weighting 40%) Generate significant value, on an existing or new asset (either operated or non-operated), through the achievement of several strategic objectives that exceed stretch targets as pre-determined by the Board, including:
-
« Define new, material JORC Mineral Resources (excluding Gonneville);
-
« Increase materially an existing JORC Mineral Resource;
-
« Define JORC Mineral Reserves or a material increase in JORC Mineral Reserves;
-
« Complete a Feasibility Study for the Gonnevillle starter mine;
-
« Submit all technical studies required for major environmental approvals for Gonneville;
-
« Secure a pathway to obtaining granted mining licences within the Julimar State Forest; and
-
« Sell or divest a material asset (as part of an asset sale, joint venture or corporate transaction).
2. Absolute TSR measure (Max. weighting 20%) A proportional LTI payment shall be made which is directly proportional to the Total Shareholder Return (TSR) from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2025. The proportion paid is calculated as:
-
« If 3-yr TSR <10% p.a (equivalent to <33.1% increase in share price) – 0%
-
« If 3-yr TSR between 10-20% p.a (equivalent to 33.1-72.8% increase in share price) - weighting pro-rata between 5-20%
-
« If 3-yr TSR >20% p.a (equivalent to >72.8% increase in share price) – weighting 20%.
3. Relative TSR compared to peer group. (Max. weighting 40%) A proportional LTI payment shall be made where the TSR exceeds the median TSR of the ASX 300 Metals and Mining Index, between 1 July 2022 and 30 June 2025. The proportion paid is calculated as:
-
« If TSR <50th percentile – 0%
-
« If TSR between 50th and 75th percentile - weighting pro-rata between 5-40%
-
« If TSR >75th percentile – weighting 40%
As an illustrative example: If the TSR is at the 65th percentile, 26% of the performance measure would be deemed to have been met – calculated as (((65%-50%)/(75%-50%))x(40%-5%))+5%.
| 85
(e) FY2024 LTI - Performance Rights FY2023-24
| Summary of Terms | |
|---|---|
| Financial Year of Issue | 30 June 2024 |
| Performance Period | 3 years (1 July 2023 – 30 June 2026) |
| Award Opportunity | MD&CEO - 175% of TFR |
| Other Executive KMP - 95% of TFR | |
| Status | Not yet tested or vested |
The table below outlines the FY2023-24 performance rights granted to Executive KMP.
| Series | KMP | Number of Rights | Measurement Date | Expiry date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Dorsch | 154,574 | 30 June 2026 | 30 June 2028 | |
| Mike Nelson | 67,433 | 30 June 2026 | 30 June 2028 | |
| FY2023-24 | Chris MacKinnon Kevin Frost |
48,948 51,745 |
30 June 2026 30 June 2026 |
30 June 2028 30 June 2028 |
| Soolim Carney | 51,745 | 30 June 2026 | 30 June 2028 | |
| Former Executive KMP | ||||
| Richard Hacker | 51,745 | 30 June 2026 | 30 June 2028 |
The following table outlines key business objectives and the weightings of the performance conditions:
No. FY2023-24 Performance Conditions and Weightings
1. Generative Exploration, Project Definition, Pre-development and Strategic (Max. weighting 40%) Generate significant value, on an existing or new asset (either operated or non-operated), through the achievement of several strategic objectives that exceed stretch targets as pre-determined by the Board, including:
-
« Define a new, material JORC Mineral Resources Estimate (excluding Gonneville);
-
« Increase materially an existing JORC Mineral Resource Estimate;
-
« Complete a Feasibility Study for the initial stage of development for the Gonnevillle Project; and
-
« Sell or divest a material asset (as part of an asset sale, joint venture or corporate transaction).
2. Absolute TSR measure (Max. weighting 20%) A proportional LTI payment shall be made which is directly proportional to the Total Shareholder Return ( TSR ) from 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2026. The proportion paid is calculated as:
-
« If 3-yr TSR <10% p.a (equivalent to <33.1% increase in share price) – 0%
-
« If 3-yr TSR between 10-20% p.a (equivalent to 33.1-72.8% increase in share price) - weighting pro-rata between 5-20%
-
« If 3-yr TSR >20% p.a (equivalent to >72.8% increase in share price) – weighting 20%
3. Relative TSR compared to peer group. (Max. weighting 40%) A proportional LTI payment shall be made where the TSR exceeds the median TSR of the ASX 300 Metals and Mining Index, between 1 July 2023 and 30 June 2026. The proportion paid is calculated as:
-
« If TSR <50th percentile – 0%
-
« If TSR between 50th and 75th percentile - weighting pro-rata between 5-40%
-
« If TSR >75th percentile – weighting 40%
As an illustrative example: If the TSR is at the 65th percentile, 26% of the performance measure would be deemed to have been met – calculated as (((65%-50%)/(75%-50%))x(40%-5%))+5%.
86 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
(f) FY2025 LTI – Performance Rights FY2024-25
| Summary of Terms | |
|---|---|
| Financial Year of Issue | 30 June 2025 |
| Performance Period Award Opportunity Status |
3 years (1 July 2024 – 30 June 2027) MD&CEO - 200% of TFR Other Executive KMP - 150% of TFR Not yet tested or vested |
The table below outlines the FY2024-25 performance rights granted to Executive KMP as at the date of this report.
| Series KMP Number of Rights Measurement Date Expiry date FY2024-25 Alex Dorsch(1) 696,458 30 June 2027 30 June 2030 Mike Nelson 418,895 30 June 2027 30 June 2030 Chris MacKinnon 341,309 30 June 2027 30 June 2030 |
|---|
| (1) The performance rights shown for Mr Dorsch are subject to the approval of shareholders at the Company’s 2024 AGM. |
The following table outlines key business objectives and the weightings of the performance conditions:
No. FY2024-25 Performance Conditions and Weightings
| No. | FY2024-25 Performance Conditions and Weightings |
|---|---|
| 1. | Exploration, Project Definition, Pre-development and Strategic (Max. weighting 40%) Generate significant value, on an existing or new asset (either operated or non-operated), through the achievement of several strategic objectives that exceed stretch targets as pre-determined by the Board, including: « Make a material new discovery which shows the potential to be economic; « Complete a Feasibility Study for the Gonnevillle Project; « Obtain all major regulatory approvals required to make a Final Investment Decision on the Gonneville |
| Project;and | |
| « Sell or divest a material asset (as part of an asset sale, joint venture or corporate transaction). | |
| 2. | Absolute TSR measure (Max. weighting 30%) |
| A proportional LTI payment shall be made which is directly proportional to the Total Shareholder Return (TSR) from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2027. The proportion paid is calculated as: |
-
« If 3-yr TSR <10% p.a (equivalent to <33.1% increase in share price) – 0%
-
« If 3-yr TSR between 10-30% p.a (equivalent to 33.1-119.7% increase in share price) - weighting pro-rata between 5-30%
« If 3-yr TSR >30% p.a (equivalent to >119.7% increase in share price) – weighting 30%
| A proportional LTI payment shall be made which is directly proportional to the Total Shareholder Return (TSR) from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2027. The proportion paid is calculated as: « If 3-yr TSR <10% p.a (equivalent to <33.1% increase in share price) – 0% « If 3-yr TSR between 10-30% p.a (equivalent to 33.1-119.7% increase in share price) - weighting pro-rata between 5-30% « If 3-yr TSR >30% p.a (equivalent to >119.7% increase in share price) – weighting 30% |
|
|---|---|
| 3. | Relative TSR compared to peer group. (Max. weighting 30%) |
| A proportional LTI payment shall be made where the TSR exceeds the median TSR of the ASX 300 Metals and | |
| Mining Index, between 1 July 2024 and 30 June 2027. The proportion paid is calculated as: | |
| « If TSR <50th percentile – 0% |
-
« If TSR between 50th and 75th percentile - weighting pro-rata between 5-30%
-
« If TSR >75th percentile – weighting 30%
As an illustrative example: If the TSR is at the 65th percentile, 20% of the performance measure would be deemed to have been met – calculated as (((65%-50%)/(75%-50%))x(30%-5%))+5%.
| 87
9.4.9 FY2022-23 Retention Rights
During the year ended 30 June 2023, the Board implemented a one-off retention rights plan with no performance hurdles other than meeting a service period of at least 3.5 years.
A summary of the terms of the retention rights is provided in the table below:
| Summary of Terms | |
|---|---|
| Milestone | Continuous employment within the Group for 3.5 years (1 July 2022 – 31 December |
| 2025) | |
| Award Opportunity | MD&CEO – Nil |
| Other Executive KMP – up front, once off award of 19% to 87.5% of TFR | |
| Quantum issued to | During the year ended 30 June 2023, 303,952 FY2022-23 Retention Rights were granted |
| Executive KMP | to Executive KMP |
| Expiry Date | 31 December 2027 |
The table below outlines the FY2022-23 retention rights held by Executive KMP.
| Executive KMP | Number of Retention Rights | Measurement Date |
|---|---|---|
| Chris MacKinnon | 32,376 | 31 December 2025 |
| Mike Nelson | 50,739 | 31 December 2025 |
| Kevin Frost | 72,872 | 31 December 2025 |
| Soolim Carney | 67,837 | 31 December 2025 |
| Former Executive KMP | ||
| Richard Hacker | 80,128 | 31 December 2025 |
The FY2022-23 retention rights were a one-off reward for FY2023. No retention rights have been granted for FY2024.
9.4.10 Executive KMP contracts
Remuneration and other terms of employment for Executive KMP are formalised in employment contracts with key terms as follows:
| Other Executive | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| A Dorsch | C MacKinnon | KMP(1) | |
| Resignation notice | 3 months | 3 months | 3 months |
| Termination notice for cause | None | None | None |
| Termination notice without cause (severance pay) | 3 months | 3 months | 3 months |
| Diminution of responsibility (severance pay) | 6 Months | 6 Months | N/A |
(1) Other Executive KMP includes Dr Carney, Dr Frost, and Mr Nelson.
All employment agreements with Executive KMP are for an unlimited duration. All Executive KMP are entitled to receive pay in lieu of notice and any accrued but untaken annual and long-service leave on cessation of employment.
88 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
9.4.11 Executive KMP statutory remuneration table for the year ended 30 June 2024
| Post- | Long- | Share- | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| employment | term |
based | |||||||
| Short-term Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | Payments | ||||||
| Executive Key Management Personnel MD&CEO Alex Dorsch 2024 2023 Executive KMP Mike Nelson 2024 2023 Chris MacKinnon(5) 2024 |
Salary & Fees(1) $ 532,090 529,900 381,643 189,616 313,184 |
Non- monetary Benefits(2) $ 4,922 10,593 6,095 10,735 7,897 |
Cash Bonus(3) $ 23,309 55,250 23,966 - 14,194 |
Super- annuation $ 27,399 25,292 27,399 12,646 27,399 |
Leave(4) $ (14,289) 36,112 (326) 5,542 6,916 |
Long-term Incentives (8) $ 295,071 509,239 309,152 140,119 116,392 |
Total $ 868,502 1,166,386 747,929 358,658 485,982 |
Performance Related(9) % 37 48 30 27 18 |
|
| 2023 | 80,620 | 3,899 | 6,108 | 7,577 | 9,943 | 62,758 | 170,905 | 20 | |
| Kevin Frost | 2024 | 326,808 | 2,916 | 14,671 | 27,399 | (2) | 188,350 | 560,142 | 18 |
| 2023 | 329,807 | 2,237 | 43,966 | 25,292 | 49,271 | 216,259 | 666,832 | 27 | |
| Soolim Carney | 2024 | 343,290 | 8,189 | 15,420 | 27,399 | 8,676 | 183,156 | 586,130 | 18 |
| Former Executives KMP Richard Hacker(6) Bruce Kendall(7) |
2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 |
306,609 225,317 350,673 233,723 328,237 |
25,397 28,425 16,183 45,703 22,679 |
32,742 8,690 38,675 - 43,966 |
25,292 19,641 25,292 19,853 25,292 |
10,538 424 7,254 (20,825) 20,825 |
188,918 115,610 235,602 150,979 219,672 |
589,496 398,107 673,679 429,433 660,671 |
25 13 28 16 28 |
| Total | 2024 | 2,356,055 | 104,147 | 100,250 | 176,489 | (19,426) | 1,358,710 | 4,076,225 | |
| 2023 | 2,115,462 | 91,723 | 220,707 | 146,683 | 139,485 | 1,572,567 | 4,286,627 |
(1) Salary and fees include base salary and additional allowances.
(2) Short-term non-monetary benefits include the cost to the company of providing car parking, income protection insurance and the movement in accrued annual leave entitlements.
(3) Cash bonuses represents the FY2024 STI payable to KMP (inclusive of superannuation).
(4) Long-term benefits relate to the movement in accrued long service leave entitlements during the year.
-
(5) Mr MacKinnon commenced as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) on 16 March 2023. Prior to this appointment as an Executive KMP, Mr MacKinnon was employed as Business Development and Legal Manager. The remuneration disclosed for the year ended 30 June 2023 for Mr MacKinnon is from the date of appointment as CFO.
-
(6) The Board carried out a review of Executive KMP in conjunction with the expenditure review announced on 22 January 2024. As a result of this review, effective 29 February 2024, it was determined that as a consequence of a reallocation of responsibilities and authority, the role of Mr Hacker, as General Manager – Strategy and Commercial is no longer classified as Executive KMP. The remuneration disclosed for Mr Hacker is up to 29 February 2024.
-
(7) Mr Kendall resigned as General Manager – Exploration on 30 April 2024.
-
(8) The amount disclosed in the table above relates to the non-cash value ascribed to performance rights and retention rights (where applicable) under Australian Accounting Standards using the Black Scholes and Monte Carlo valuation methodologies and allocated to each reporting period evenly over the period from grant date to vesting date. The value disclosed is the portion of the fair value of the performance rights and retention rights allocated to this reporting period. This includes negative amounts where a share-based payment expense is reversed due to a non-market-based performance condition not being met or if an adjustment made to the number of performance rights or retention rights that may vest based on a probability of meeting non-market based performance conditions.
-
(9) Performance related percentages are calculated using the non-cash value ascribed to performance rights (excluding retention rights) allocated to the reporting period (refer footnote 8 above) and the cash bonus payable (STI payable) as a proportion of total compensation.
| 89
9.5 Non-executive director remuneration
9.5.1 Policy & Approach
The Company’s Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules specify that the maximum aggregate fees paid to nonexecutive directors for their role as a director is determined by shareholders. The latest determination was at the 2021 Annual General Meeting (AGM), whereby Shareholders approved a maximum aggregate amount of $850,000 per annum (including superannuation). The Board is not seeking to increase the non-executive director fee pool at the upcoming 2024 AGM.
The fee structure for non-executive directors is reviewed at least annually by the RNC and approved by the Board. The fee structure is set to:
-
« Attract and retain highly qualified directors with appropriate skills and experience;
-
« Reflect the time commitment and responsibilities of the role; and
-
« Be competitive with comparator companies.
Other than the payment of statutory superannuation benefits, non-executive directors are not entitled to receive retirement benefits.
The Company does not issue convertible securities or performance related remuneration to non-executive directors.
All non-executive directors enter into a letter of appointment with the Company. The letter summarises the Company’s policies, terms of appointment, including remuneration, relevant to the office of Non-executive Director.
9.5.2 Non-executive director remuneration for FY2024
In July 2023, the Board reviewed the remuneration paid to non-executive directors having regard to internally generated benchmarking against similar companies in the mining industry and the increasing time commitments being placed on Board members. As a result of this review the Board approved an increase in non-executive director fees, effective 1 July 2023. There were no changes to board committee fees.
In January 2024, the Board implemented a 25% reduction in Non-executive Director and committee fees to minimise expenditure and conserve cash in response to a deterioration in market conditions impacting the resources sector, particularly nickel and platinum group metals. This reduction was effective from 1 February 2024.
9.5.3 Non-executive director remuneration for FY2025
In August 2024, the Board undertook a review of the Company to reduce expenditure in light of the current metals price environment. This review resulted in the size of the number of Non-executive Directors on the Board being decreased from five to three members.
In conjunction with this restructure, the Board reviewed Non-executive Director and committee fees for FY2025, and it was determined that effective from 1 September 2024, base fees paid to Non-executive Directors will be an inclusive fee with no additional amounts paid for the additional committee appointments accepted as a consequence of the restructure. The inclusive fee has been set at the level each remaining non-executive director was receiving following the January 2024 fee reduction.
9.5.4 Summary of non-executive director fees
Non-executive director fees are shown in the table below (inclusive of superannuation). Fees shown for the period 1 July 2023 to 31 January 2024 are for comparative purposes.
| From | From | From | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 September 2024 | 1 February 2024 | 1 July 2023 | |
| $ | $ | $ | |
| Base Fees (per annum, incl. superannuation) | |||
| Non-executive Chair | 155,625 | 138,750 | 185,000 |
| Non-executive Directors | 91,875 | 75,000 | 100,000 |
| Committee Fees (per annum, incl. superannuation) | |||
| Chairperson of Committee | N/A | 11,250 | 15,000 |
| Member of Committee | N/A | 5,625 | 7,500 |
90 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
9.5.5 Minimum shareholding requirement for non-executive directors
To align the interests of the Board and shareholders, in the absence of approval from the Board to the contrary, Directors are required to acquire and maintain directly or indirectly through their associates (as defined by the Corporation Act 2001 (Cth)), a minimum number of Shares in the Company, the value of which is equal to 100% of their annual remuneration. The minimum shareholding holding must be reached within five years of appointment to the Board. The value of the Directors shareholding will be determined as the higher of the cost of acquisition or the market value of the Shares. The minimum holding assessment is undertaken at the end of each financial year.
The minimum holding assessment at 30 June 2024 based on a closing share price of $1.42 for the Directors of the Company as at the date of this report is shown in the table below:
| Name Derek La Ferla |
No. Shares Held at 30 June 2024 34,561 |
% of Remuneration 75% |
Minimum Holding Requirement Not Achieved |
Requirement Date 1 October 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Dorsch | 5,936,341 | 1,682% | Achieved | 13 November 2023 |
| Garret Dixon | 152,739 | 380% | Achieved | 21 August 2025 |
| Stephen McIntosh | 37,558 | 120% | Achieved | 22 February2026 |
9.5.6 Non-executive director remuneration FY2024
| Non-executive Directors | Short-term Benefits Fees $ Non- monetary Benefits $ |
Short-term Benefits Fees $ Non- monetary Benefits $ |
Post- employment Benefits Super- annuation $ |
Share- based Payments Options $ |
Total $ |
Performance Related % |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek La Ferla | 2024 | 167,464 | - | 18,421 | - | 185,885 | - | |
| 2023 | 153,409 | 13,021 | 16,108 | - | 182,538 | - | ||
| Garret Dixon | 2024 | 98,865 | - | 10,875 | - | 109,740 | - | |
| 2023 | 86,410 | 13,021 | 9,073 | - | 108,504 | - | ||
| Jo Gaines(1) Linda Kenyon Stephen McIntosh |
2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 |
94,078 65,330 94,078 76,923 98,865 86,410 |
- 11,344 - 13,021 - 13,021 |
10,349 6,860 10,349 8,077 10,875 9,073 |
- - - - - - |
104,427 83,534 104,427 98,021 109,740 108,504 |
- - - - - - |
|
| Former Non-executive | ||||||||
| Directors | ||||||||
| Morgan Ball(2) | 2024 | 83,736 | - | 3,035 | - | 86,771 | - | |
| Total | 2023 2024 2023 |
83,710 637,086 552,192 |
13,021 - 76,449 |
8,790 63,904 57,981 |
- - - |
105,521 700,990 686,622 |
- |
(1) Ms Gaines was appointed as a Non-executive Director on 17 August 2022.
(2) Mr Ball resigned as a Non-executive Director on 31 March 2024.
| 91
9.6 Equity instruments
9.6.1 Options issued as compensation
During the financial year, no options over ordinary shares were issued as compensation under the Employee Securities Incentive Plan (ESIP).
9.6.2 Options exercised during the year ended 30 June 2024
During the financial year, no options over ordinary shares were exercised under the Employee Share Incentive Plan (ESIP).
9.6.3 Performance rights granted as compensation
During the reporting period the following performance rights were issued as compensation to KMP and details of performance rights that vested during the reporting period are as follows:
| Fair value of | Weighted | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of | performance | average | ||||
| performance | rights at | fair value | Number of | |||
| rights | issue date | per right | performance | |||
| granted | Issue date | $ | $ | Expiry date | rights vested | |
| Directors | ||||||
| Alex Dorsch | 154,574 | 23 November 2023 | 49,680 | 0.32 | 30 June 2028 | 210,060 |
| Executives | ||||||
| Mike Nelson | 67,433 | 30 August 2023 | 178,751 | 2.65 | 30 June 2028 | - |
| Chris MacKinnon | 48,948 | 30 August 2023 | 129,751 | 2.65 | 30 June 2028 | 31,542 |
| Kevin Frost | 51,745 | 30 August 2023 | 137,166 | 2.65 | 30 June 2028 | 120,316 |
| Soolim Carney | 51,745 | 30 August 2023 | 137,166 | 2.65 | 30 June 2028 | - |
| Former Executive KMP | ||||||
| Richard Hacker | 51,745 | 30 August 2023 | 137,166 | 2.65 | 30 June 2028 | 120,669 |
| Bruce Kendall(1) | 51,745 | 30 August 2023 | 137,166 | 2.65 | 30 June 2028 | 118,344 |
(1) 51,745 performance rights granted to Mr Kendall during the reporting period were subsequently forfeited on his resignation.
The value of performance rights issued during the year is the fair value of performance rights calculated at the issue date using the Monte Carlo simulation model (market based conditions) and the Black Scholes option valuation methodology (non-market based conditions) that takes into account the term of performance rights, the share price at the issue date and expected volatility of the underlying performance right, the expected dividend yield, the risk free rate for the term of the performance right and the correlations and volatilities of the peer companies. The total value of the performance rights granted is included in the table above. This amount is allocated to remuneration over the vesting period. Refer to Note 17 of the financial statements for model inputs for the performance rights issued during the year.
92 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Details of the vesting profile of performance rights issued as remuneration to each KMP of the Group are outlined below:
| % | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of | % | forfeited/ | |||||
| Performance | vested | lapsed | in | Measurement | |||
| Series | Rights | Issue date | in year | year | Date | ||
| Directors | |||||||
| Alex Dorsch | FY2020-21 | 280,081 | 25 November 2020 | 75% | 25% | 30 June 2023 | |
| FY2021-22 | 65,531 | 24 November 2021 | - | - | 30 June 2024 | ||
| FY2022-23 | 228,938 | 23 November 2022 | - | - | 30 June 2025 | ||
| FY2023-24 | 154,574 | 23 November 2023 | - | - | 30 June 2026 | ||
| Executives | |||||||
| Chris MacKinnon | FY2020-21 | 34,556 | 2 September 2020 | 75% | 25% | 30 June 2023 | |
| FY2020-21 | 7,500 | 26 November 2020 | 75% | 25% | 30 June 2023 | ||
| FY2021-22 | 15,415 | 23 September 2021 | - | - | 30 June 2024 | ||
| FY2022-23 | 43,168 | 5 September 2022 | - | - | 30 June 2025 | ||
| FY2023-24 | 48,948 | 30 August 2023 | - | - | 30 June 2026 | ||
| Kevin Frost | FY2020-21 | 160,422 | 2 September 2020 | 75% | 25% | 30 June 2023 | |
| FY2021-22 | 34,404 | 23 September 2021 | - | - | 30 June 2024 | ||
| FY2022-23 | 79,118 | 5 September 2022 | - | - | 30 June 2025 | ||
| FY2023-24 | 51,745 | 30 August 2023 | - | - | 30 June 2026 | ||
| Soolim Carney | FY2021-22 | 50,895 | 21 September 2021 | - | - | 30 June 2024 | |
| FY2022-23 | 73,652 | 5 September 2022 | - | - | 30 June 2025 | ||
| FY2023-24 | 51,745 | 30 August 2023 | - | - | 30 June 2026 | ||
| Mike Nelson | FY2022-23 | 121,775 | 1 February 2023 | - | - | 30 June 2025 | |
| FY2023-24 | 67,433 | 30 August 2023 | - | - | 30 June 2026 | ||
| Former Executive KMP | |||||||
| Richard Hacker | FY2020-21 | 160,893 | 2 September 2020 | 75% | 25% | 30 June 2023 | |
| FY2021-22 | 34,404 | 23 September 2021 | - | - | 30 June 2024 | ||
| FY2022-23 | 86,997 | 5 September 2022 | - | - | 30 June 2025 | ||
| FY2023-24 | 51,745 | 30 August 2023 | - | - | 30 June 2026 | ||
| Bruce Kendall(1) | FY2020-21 | 157,792 | 2 September 2020 | 75% | 25% | 30 June 2023 | |
| FY2021-22 | 34,404 | 23 September 2021 | - | - | 30 June 2024 | ||
| FY2022-23 | 79,118 | 5 September 2022 | - | 100% | 30 June 2025 | ||
| FY2023-24 | 51,745 | 30 August 2023 | - | 100% | 30 June 2026 |
(1) The Board exercised its discretion to allow Mr Kendall to retain 34,404 FY2021-22 Performance Rights under the “good leaver” provisions of the Employee Securities Incentive Plan. The remaining unvested performance rights held by Mr Kendall were forfeited on resignation.
| 93
9.6.4 Performance Rights exercised during the year ended 30 June 2024
| Value of | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of | Exercise | performance | |||||
| performance | price per |
No. of | rights | ||||
| rights | share | Shares | exercised(1) | ||||
| Date of exercise | Grant Date | exercised | $ | Issued | $ | ||
| Directors | |||||||
| Alex Dorsch | 2 | September 2023 | 25 November 2020 | 210,060 | Nil | 210,060 | 768,614 |
| Executives | |||||||
| Chris MacKinnon | 31 August 2023 | 2 September 2020 | 25,917 | Nil | 25,917 | 99,783 | |
| 31 August 2023 | 26 November 2020 | 5,625 | Nil | 5,625 | 21,657 | ||
| Kevin Frost | 21 June 2024 | 2 September 2020 | 120,316 | Nil | 120,316 | 160,319 | |
| Former Executive | KMP | ||||||
| Richard Hacker | 1 | September 2023 | 2 September 2020 | 120,669 | Nil | 120,669 | 441,531 |
| Bruce Kendall | 31 August 2023 | 2 September 2020 | 60,000 | Nil | 60,000 | 231,007 | |
| 2 | September 2023 | 2 September 2020 | 58,344 | Nil | 58,344 | 219,541 |
(1) The value of each exercised performance right is based on Chalice’s 5-day VWAP prior to the date of exercise.
9.6.5 Retention Rights granted as compensation
During the reporting period no retention rights were issued as compensation to Executive KMP and no retention rights vested during the reporting period.
Details of the vesting profile of retention rights issued as remuneration to each KMP of the Group are outlined below:
| % | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of | % | forfeited/ | |||||
| Retention | vested | lapsed | in | ||||
| Series | Rights | Issue date | in year | year | Measurement Date | ||
| Executives | |||||||
| Kevin Frost | FY2022-23 | 72,872 | 5 September 2023 | - | - | 31 December 2025 | |
| Chris MacKinnon | FY2022-23 | 32,376 | 5 September 2023 | - | - | 31 December 2025 | |
| Mike Nelson | FY2022-23 | 50,739 | 1 February 2023 | - | - | 31 December 2025 | |
| Soolim Carney | FY2022-23 | 67,837 | 5 September 2023 | - | - | 31 December 2025 | |
| Former Executive | KMP | ||||||
| Richard Hacker | FY2022-23 | 80,128 | 5 September 2023 | - | - | 31 December 2025 | |
| Bruce Kendall | FY2022-23 | 72,872 | 5 September 2023 | - | 100 | 31 December 2025 |
9.6.6 Retention Rights exercised during the year ended 30 June 2024
No retention rights were exercised during the year ended 30 June 2024.
9.6.7 Equity holdings of key management personnel
(a) Option holdings of key management personnel
No options were held by KMP at 30 June 2024. No options were granted to KMP and no options were forfeited or lapsed during the year ended 30 June 2024.
94 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
(b) Performance rights held by key management personnel
The movement during the reporting period in the number of performance rights in the Group held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each KMP, including their related parties, is as follows:
| Vested and | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vested | exercisable | ||||||
| Held at | Granted as | Held at | during the | at 30 June | |||
| 1 July 2023 | compensation | Exercised | Forfeited/Lapsed | 30 June 2024 |
year | 2024 | |
| Directors | |||||||
| Derek La Ferla | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alex Dorsch | 574,550 | 154,574 | (210,060) | (70,021) | 449,043 | 210,060 | - |
| Morgan Ball | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Garret Dixon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jo Gaines | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Linda Kenyon | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stephen McIntosh | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Executives | |||||||
| Chris MacKinnon | 100,639 | 48,948 | (31,542) | (10,514) | 107,531 | 31,542 | - |
| Mike Nelson | 121,775 | 67,433 | - | - | 189,208 | - | - |
| Kevin Frost | 273,944 | 51,745 | (120,316) | (40,106) | 165,267 | 120,316 | - |
| Soolim Carney | 124,547 | 51,745 | - | - | 176,292 | - | - |
| Former Executive | |||||||
| KMP | |||||||
| Richard Hacker(1) | 282,294 | 51,745 | (120,669) | (40,224) | 173,146 | 120,669 | - |
| BruceKendall(1) | 271,314 | 51,745 | (118,344) | (170,311) | 34,404 | 118,344 | - |
(1) Represents performance rights held by Messrs Hacker and Kendall on the date they ceased to be KMP on 29 February 2024 and 30 April 2024 respectively.
(c) Retention rights held by key management personnel
| Vested and | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vested | exercisable | ||||||
| Held at | Granted as | Held at | during the | at 30 June | |||
| 1 July 2023 | compensation | Exercised | Forfeited/lapsed | 30 June 2024 |
year | 2024 | |
| Executives | |||||||
| Mike Nelson | 50,739 | - | - | - | 50,739 | - | - |
| Chris MacKinnon | 32,376 | - | - | - | 32,376 | - | - |
| Kevin Frost | 72,872 | - | - | - | 72,872 | - | - |
| Soolim Carney | 67,837 | - | - | - | 67,837 | - | - |
| Former Executive | |||||||
| KMP | |||||||
| Richard Hacker(1) | 80,128 | - | - | - | 80,128 | - | - |
| BruceKendall(1) | 72,872 | - | - | (72,872) | - | - | - |
No retention rights are held by non-executive directors and the MD&CEO.
(1) Represents retention rights held by Messrs Hacker and Kendall on the date they ceased to be KMP on 29 February 2024 and 30 April 2024 respectively.
| 95
(d) Shareholdings of key management personnel
The movement during the reporting period in the number of ordinary shares in the Company held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each KMP, including their related parties, is as follows:
| Received on | Received on | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Held at | exercise of | exercise of | Held at | |||
| 1 July 2023 | options | performance rights | Other changes(1) | 30 June 2024 | ||
| Directors | ||||||
| Derek La Ferla | 24,961 | - | - | 9,600 | 34,561 | |
| Alex Dorsch | 5,726,281 | - | 210,060 | - | 5,936,341 | |
| Garret Dixon | 152,739 | - | - | - | 152,739 | |
| Jo Gaines | 9,753 | - | - | - | 9,753 | |
| Linda Kenyon | 8,369 | - | - | - | 8,369 | |
| Stephen McIntosh | 37,558 | - | - | - | 37,558 | |
| Former Directors | ||||||
| Morgan Ball(2) | 354,816 | - | - | 3,500 | 358,316 | |
| Executives | ||||||
| Chris MacKinnon | - | - | 31,542 | (31,542) | - | |
| Mike Nelson | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Soolim Carney | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Kevin Frost | 1,389,240 | - | 120,316 | - | 1,509,556 | |
| Former | ||||||
| Executives KMP | ||||||
| Richard Hacker(2) | 1,100,606 | - | 120,669 | - | 1,221,275 | |
| Bruce Kendall(2) | 108,221 | - | 118,344 | (60,000) | 166,565 |
(1) Other changes represent shares that were purchased or sold on-market.
(2) Represents shares held by Messrs Ball, Hacker and Kendall on the date they ceased to be KMP.
9.7 Loans to key management personnel
There were no loans to key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties as at 30 June 2024 (2023: nil).
9.8 Other transactions with key management personnel and their related parties
There were no other key management personnel transactions within the Group during the year ended 30 June 2024 .
End of Remuneration Report
10. DIVIDENDS
No dividends were declared or paid during the year and the directors recommend that no dividend be paid.
11. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
In the opinion of Directors, information regarding the likely developments of the Group is set out in the Operating and Financial Review on pages 16 to 26 of the Annual Report, which forms part of this Directors’ Report. Disclosure of any further information relating to likely developments and expected results could result in unreasonable prejudice to the interests of the Group.
12. MATTERS SUBSEQUENT TO THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR
On 30 July 2024, 20% of the FY2021-22 Performance Rights that were issued to KMP and employees in 2021 vested on the achievement of certain performance conditions measured over the three years ended 30 June 2024. On 31 July 2024, the Company issued 63,484 fully paid ordinary shares to CPU Share Plans Pty Limited as trustee of the Chalice Mining Employee Share Trust for allocation to the participants upon exercising their Performance Rights. Subsequent to vesting, 26,710 Performance Rights were exercised into an equivalent number of fully paid ordinary shares.
96 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
On 26 September 2024, the Company issued 3,523,565 FY2024-25 Performance Rights to Executive KMP and employees of the Company under the terms of the Employee Securities Incentive Plan. In addition, it was also resolved that Alex Dorsch, MD&CEO be awarded 696,458 Performance Rights on the same terms and conditions. The issue of the Performance Rights to Mr Dorsch is conditional on the receipt of shareholder approval to be sought at the Company’s 2024 Annual General Meeting.
Other than disclosed above, there has not been any other matter or circumstance that has arisen since the end of the financial year that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect, the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
13. SHARE PLACEMENTS AND ISSUES
During the financial year, the Company issued the following fully paid ordinary shares, excluding options and performance rights exercised:
| Description | Date | No. of shares |
Price per share ($) |
Amount Raised Before Costs ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase of a private property | 1 September 2023 | 611,371 | 5.89 | Nil |
| Consideration under an earn-in agreement | 1 September 2023 | 629,755 | 3.89 | Nil |
14. SHARE OPTIONS
At the date of this report there are no unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option.
15. PERFORMANCE RIGHTS
At the date of this report 5,313,208 performance rights (2,176,102 at reporting date) are on issue with the following terms and conditions:
| Series | Exercise price ($) |
Number of rights | Measurement date | Expiry date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2021-22 | Nil | 36,774 | 30 June 2024 | 30 June 2026 |
| FY2022-23 | Nil | 841,164 | 30 June 2025 | 30 June 2027 |
| FY2023-24 | Nil | 911,705 | 30 June 2026 | 30 June 2028 |
| FY2024-25 | Nil | 3,523,565 | 30 June 2027 | 30 June 2030 |
In addition to the above, the Board has resolved, subject to shareholder approval at the Company’s 2024 AGM to grant Mr Dorsch 696,458 FY2024-25 performance rights with a test date of 30 June 2027, and expiry of 30 June 2030.
Until vesting and unless exercised, these performance rights do not entitle the holder to participate in any share issue of the Company or any other entity.
16. RETENTION RIGHTS
At the date of this report 545,021 retention rights (545,021 at reporting date) are on issue with the following terms and conditions:
| Series FY2022-23 |
Exercise price ($) Nil |
Measurement date 31 December 2025 |
Expiry date 31 December 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|
Until vesting and unless exercised, these retention rights do not entitle the holder to participate in any share issue of the Company or any other entity.
17. ADDITIONAL SHARE OPTION DISCLOSURES
Included in the performance rights above are performance rights granted as remuneration to the directors and the five most highly remunerated officers during or since the end of the financial year ended 30 June 2024. Details of performance rights granted to KMP are disclosed on page 87 and 92.
The following performance rights were granted to Jamie Armes, Company Secretary, an officer who is among the five highest remunerated officers of the Company and the Group during or since the end of the financial year ended 30 June 2024, but is not KMP and hence not disclosed in the Remuneration Report:
| 97
| Incentive | Series | Exercise price | Number of rights | Measurement date | Expiry date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($) | |||||
| Performance rights | FY2023-24 | Nil | 20,355 | 30 June 2026 | 30 June 2028 |
| Performance rights | FY2024-25 | Nil | 181,245 | 30 June 2027 | 30 June 2030 |
18. SHARES ISSUED ON EXERCISE OF OPTIONS
During the financial year no shares were issued on exercise of options and there have been no option exercises since the end of the financial year to the date of this report.
19. SHARES ISSUED ON VESTING AND EXERCISE OF PERFORMANCE RIGHTS
On 12 July 2023, the Company issued 788,387 fully paid ordinary shares at $5.99 per share to CPU Share Plans Pty Ltd, as trustee of the Chalice Mining Employee Share Trust following the following the vesting of 75% of the FY2020-21 performance rights for allocation to participants upon exercising their performance rights.
Subsequent to the end of the financial year, on 31 July 2024, the Company issued 63,484 fully paid ordinary shares to CPU Share Plans Pty Limited as trustee of the Chalice Mining Employee Share Trust following the vesting of 20% of the FY2021-22 performance rights.
20. ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION
The Group is subject to environmental legislation and obligations within the jurisdictions in which it operates throughout Australia.
The Group has policies and procedures in place that are designed to ensure that, where our activities are subject to any particular and significant environmental regulation under the law of the Commonwealth of Australia or of an Australian State or Territory, those obligations are identified, appropriately addressed and any breaches promptly notified.
So far as the Directors are aware, there have been no material breaches of the Group’s licence conditions and environmental regulations to which the Group is subject to during the year ended 30 June 2024 and to the date of this report.
21. PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY
No application has been made under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of the Company, and there are no proceedings that a person has brought or intervened in on behalf of the Company under that section.
22. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The Company has agreed, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to indemnify each of its Directors and Officers who have held office during the year, against all liabilities to a third party (other than the Company or a related body corporate of the Company) that may arise from their position as a Director or Officer of the Company or a related body corporate of the Company. The indemnity stipulates that the Company will meet the full amount of any such liabilities, including legal costs incurred.
During the year the Group has paid insurance premiums in respect of a contract insuring Directors and Officers of the Group against a liability incurred as a Director or Officer to the extent permitted by the Corporations Act 2001 . The contract of insurance prohibits disclosure of the nature of the coverage and the amount of the premium.
23. INDEMNIFICATION OF AUDITORS
The Company has not, during or since the end of the financial year, indemnified or agreed to indemnify the auditor of the Company against a liability incurred as an auditor.
24. NON-AUDIT SERVICES
During the year, the Group’s external auditor, did not provide any non-audit services (2023: nil). Refer to Note 26 for further information on auditor’s remuneration.
In the event that non-audit services are provided by the Group’s external auditor, the Company has established procedures to ensure that the provision of non-audit services do not impact the auditor’s independence. These
98 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
include the Audit Committee reviewing and approving non-audit services performed by the auditor having regard to auditor independence requirements of applicable laws, rules and regulations, to ensure that the provision of that service or type of service would not impair the auditor’s impartiality and objectivity.
25. AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
The auditor’s independence declaration, as required under section 302C of the Corporations Act 2001 , is set out on page 100 and forms part of this Directors’ Report.
26. ROUNDING OF AMOUNTS
The amounts contained in this financial report have been rounded to the nearest thousand unless otherwise specified under the option available to the Company under ASIC Corporations (Rounding in Financial/Directors’ Reports) Instrument 2016/191. The Company is an entity to which this legislative instrument applies.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors made pursuant to section 298(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 .
On behalf of the Directors.
==> picture [69 x 46] intentionally omitted <==
Alex Dorsch
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Dated at Perth the 26th day of September 2024
| 99
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
==> picture [131 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
As lead auditor for the audit of the consolidated financial report of Chalice Mining Limited for the year ended 30 June 2024, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of:
-
a) the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
-
b) any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
==> picture [73 x 52] intentionally omitted <==
Perth, Western Australia B G McVeigh 26 September 2024 Partner
==> picture [289 x 78] intentionally omitted <==
100 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
==> picture [555 x 842] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
| 101
Financial Statements
----- End of picture text -----
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the year ended 30 June 2024
| 2024 2023 |
|
|---|---|
| Note | $’000 $’000 |
| Other Income 5(a) Interest income Finance expense Foreign exchange gain/(loss) Net gain on sale of subsidiary 9 Exploration and evaluation expenditure 7 Corporate and administration expenses 6(a) Share-based payments 17(a) Loss before tax Income tax benefit 8 Loss for the year attributed to owners of the parent Other comprehensive income/(loss) Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss Net loss on fair value of financial assets, net of tax 22(b) Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss Exchanges differences on translation of foreign operations Other comprehensive profit/(loss) for the year Total comprehensive loss for the year Total comprehensive loss for the year attributable to owners of the parent Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations 10 |
118 1,299 5,037 2,877 (186) (161) (6) 21 860 - (42,492) (61,833) (5,995) (6,251) (1,957) (2,708) |
| (44,621) (66,756) 5,123 1,154 |
|
| (39,498) (65,602) |
|
| 7,411 (610) (4) 3 |
|
| 7,407 (607) |
|
| (32,091) (66,209) |
|
| (32,091) (66,209) |
|
| (0.10) (0.17) |
The above consolidated statement of comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
102 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
As at 30 June 2024
| 2024 2023 |
|
|---|---|
| Note | $’000 $’000 |
| Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 11 Receivables 12 Income tax receivable 8 Financial assets 13 Total current assets Non-current assets Financial assets 13 Right-of-use assets 15 Property, plant and equipment 14 Total non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables 18 Grant funding received in advance 19 Lease liabilities 20 Employee benefits 16 Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Lease liabilities 20 Employee benefits 16 Other liabilities Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity Issued capital 21 Accumulated losses Reserves 22 Total equity |
88,950 145,223 1,992 2,469 2,215 872 22,080 2,956 |
| 115,237 151,520 |
|
| 548 596 1,509 1,161 53,373 45,787 |
|
| 55,430 47,544 |
|
| 170,667 199,064 |
|
| 3,195 7,951 1,720 1,266 243 363 624 779 |
|
| 5,782 10,359 |
|
| 1,869 1,364 225 237 - 54 |
|
| 2,094 1,655 |
|
| 7,876 12,014 |
|
| 162,791 187,050 |
|
| 367,467 359,913 (215,935) (176,310) 11,259 3,447 |
|
| 162,791 187,050 |
The above consolidated statement of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
| 103
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 30 June 2024
| Issued Accumulated Share based payments reserve Investment revaluation reserve Foreign currency translation reserve |
|
|---|---|
| capital losses Note 22(a) Note 22(b) Note 22(c) Total |
|
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 |
|
| Balance at 1 July 2023 Loss for the year Other comprehensive income for the period Net gain on fair value of financial assets, net of tax Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year Issue of share capital (net of costs) Share-based payments Transfers between equity items Balance at 30 June 2024 |
359,913 (176,310) 3,977 (655) 125 187,050 |
| - (39,498) - - - (39,498) - - - 7,411 - 7,411 - - - - (4) (4) |
|
| - (39,498) - 7,411 (4) (32,091) |
|
| 5,875 - - - - 5,875 - - 1,957 - - 1,957 1,679 (127) (1,679) 127 - - |
|
| 367,467 (215,935) 4,255 6,883 121 162,791 |
|
| Issued Accumulated Share based payments reserve Investment revaluation reserve Foreign currency translation reserve |
|
| capital losses Note 22(a) Note 22(b) Note 22(c) Total |
|
| $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 |
|
| Balance at 1 July 2022 Loss for the year Other comprehensive income for the period Net gain/(loss) on fair value of financial assets, net of tax Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year Issue of share capital (net of costs) Share-based payments Transfers between equity items Balance at 30 June 2023 |
285,040 (112,564) 3,235 (45) 665 176,331 |
| - (65,602) - - - (65,602) - - - (610) - (610) - - - - 3 3 |
|
| - (65,602) - (610) 3 (66,209) |
|
| 74,220 - - - - 74,220 - - 2,708 - - 2,708 653 1,856 (1,966) - (543) - |
|
| 359,913 (176,310) 3,977 (655) 125 187,050 |
The above consolidated statement of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
104 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Consolidated Statement of ~~Cash Flows~~
For the year ended 30 June 2024
| 2024 2023 |
|
|---|---|
| Note | |
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| Cash flows from operating activities Cash receipts from operations Cash paid to suppliers and employees Payments for mineral exploration and evaluation Payroll taxes paid on granted securities Research and development tax credit received Government grants and incentives received Interest received Interest paid Net cash used in operating activities 11(a) Cash flows from investing activities Acquisition of property, plant and equipment Acquisition of freehold land and buildings Proceeds from sale of fixed assets Proceeds from sale of financial assets Payment for acquisition of financial assets Costs associated with disposal of subsidiary 9 Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Payment of principal portion of lease liabilities Security deposits Proceeds from issue of shares 21(a) Proceeds from the exercise of options Share issue costs Net cash (used)/from financing activities Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June 11 |
107 174 (5,513) (6,008) (43,390) (59,808) (454) - - 1,834 500 1,390 4,819 2,679 (158) (198) |
| (44,089) (59,937) |
|
| (172) (438) (4,400) - 94 12 636 - (7,668) (400) (67) - |
|
| (11,577) (826) |
|
| (505) (259) 37 111 - 76,420 - 329 (128) (2,325) |
|
| (596) 74,276 |
|
| (56,262) 13,513 145,223 131,712 (11) (2) |
|
| 88,950 145,223 |
The above consolidated statement of cash flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
~~|~~ ~~105~~
Contents of the Notes to the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2024
SUMMARY OF MATERIAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
| Note 1: | Corporate information |
|---|---|
| Note 2: | Reporting entity |
| Note 3: | Basis of preparation |
| PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR | |
| Note 4: | Segment reporting |
| Note 5: | Other income |
| Note 6: | Expenses |
| Note 7: | Exploration and evaluation expenditure |
| Note 8: | Income tax |
| Note 9: | Net gain on sale of subsidiary |
| Note 10: | Loss per share |
| ASSETS | |
| Note 11: | Cash and cash equivalents |
| Note 12: | Receivables |
| Note 13: | Financial assets |
| Note 14: | Property, plant and equipment |
| Note 15: | Right-of-use-asserts |
| EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS | |
| Note 16: | Employee benefits |
| Note 17: | Share-based payments |
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |
| Note 18: | Trade and other payables |
| Note 19: | Grant funding received in advance |
| Note 20: | Lease liabilities |
| Note 21: | Issued capital |
| Note 22: | Reserves |
| FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | |
| Note 23: | Financial instruments |
| GROUP COMPOSITION | |
| Note 24: | Parent entity |
| Note 25: | List of subsidiaries |
| OTHER INFORMATION | |
| Note 26: | Auditor’s remuneration |
| Note 27: | Related parties |
| Note 28: | Commitments and contingencies |
| Note 29: | Events subsequent to reporting date |
| ACCOUNTING POLICIES | |
| Note 30: | Changes in accounting policies |
| Note 31: | Adoption of new and revised accounting standards |
106 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2024
Summary of Material Accounting Policies
This Section of the financial report sets out the Group’s (being Chalice Mining Limited and its controlled entities) accounting policies that relate to the Consolidated Financial Statements as a whole. Where the accounting policy is specific to one note, the policy is described in the note to which it relates.
The notes include information which is required to understand the Financial Statements and is material and relevant to the operations and the financial position and performance of the Group.
Information is considered relevant and material if:
-
« The amount is significant due to its size or nature
-
« The amount is important in understanding the results of the Group
-
« It helps to explain the impact of significant changes in the Group’s business
-
« It relates to an aspect of the Group’s operations that is important to its future performance.
1. CORPORATE INFORMATION
The consolidated financial report of Chalice Mining Limited for the year ended 30 June 2024 was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of Directors on 26th September 2024.
Chalice Mining Limited is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”) (trading under the code CHN) and is domiciled in Australia at its principal place of business, Level 3, 46 Colin Street, West Perth, Western Australia. The nature of the operations and principal activities are disclosed in the Directors’ Report.
2. REPORTING ENTITY
The consolidated financial report comprises the financial statements of Chalice Mining Limited (“Company” or “Parent”) and its subsidiaries (“the Group”) for the year ended 30 June 2024. A list of the Group’s subsidiaries is provided at note 25.
3. BASIS OF PREPARATION
(a) Statement of compliance
The financial report is a general purpose financial report which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. The financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
(b) Basis of measurement
The financial report has been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for financial assets which have been measured at fair value. Cost is based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for assets. Chalice is domiciled in Australia and all amounts are presented in Australian dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
The consolidated financial statements provide comparative information in respect of the previous period. In addition, the Group presents an additional statement of financial position at the beginning of the earliest period presented when there is a retrospective application of an accounting policy, a retrospective restatement, or a reclassification of items in financial statements.
All amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise stated in accordance with ASIC Corporations (Rounding in Financial/ Directors’ Reports) Instrument 2016/191.
(c) Material accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
The preparation of a financial report in conformity with Australian Accounting Standards requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
| 107
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. These accounting policies have been consistently applied by the Group.
Uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets or liabilities affected in future periods. The Group also discloses its exposure to risks and uncertainties in note 23. The key judgements, estimates and assumptions which are material to the financial report are found in note 17.
PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR
This section provides additional information about those line items in the Statement of Comprehensive Income that the directors consider most relevant in the context of the operations of the entity.
4. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Group has identified its operating segments based on internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Board of Directors in assessing performance and in determining the allocation of resources. The Group considers that it only operated in one reportable segment, being mineral exploration and evaluation. The segment information is as per the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
5. OTHER INCOME
| (a) Other Income Net gain on sale of exploration assets Government grants and incentives Other |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| - 386 - 732 118 181 |
|
| 118 1,299 |
Government grants and incentives for the year ended 30 June 2023 represents the Group’s share of grant income received under a Cooperative Research Centre Program (“CRC-P”) with the Commonwealth Government (refer note 19).
Material Accounting Policy
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of returns, trade allowances, rebates and amounts collected on behalf of third parties.
Government Grants are recognised when there is reasonable certainty that the grant will be received, and all grant conditions are met. Grants relating to expense items are recognised as income over the periods necessary to match the grant to the costs they are compensating.
6. EXPENSES
| (a) Corporate and administration expenses Administration and general costs Depreciation Corporate personnel expenses (note 6(b)) (b) Corporate personnel expenses Wages and salaries Non-executive directors’ fees Other associated personnel expenses Leave entitlements |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 2,457 2,423 182 208 3,356 3,620 |
|
| 5,995 6,251 |
|
| 2024 2023 |
|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 2,197 1,922 708 617 482 934 (31) 147 |
|
| 3,356 3,620 |
108 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended 30 of June 2024
7. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENDITURE
| EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENDITURE | |
|---|---|
| Western Australia Gonneville - exploration Gonneville - development/studies West Yilgarn(1) Other generative projects |
2024 2023 |
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 15,204 46,891 12,060 6,501 15,083 8,092 145 349 |
|
| 42,492 61,833 |
(1)During the reporting period the Company issued 629,755 fully paid ordinary shares, equivalent to $2.45 million, to Northam Resources Limited on commencement of an earn-in agreement (refer note 21).
Material Accounting Policy
Costs incurred in the exploration and evaluation stages of specific areas of interest are expensed against profit or loss as incurred. All exploration expenditure, including acquisition costs, general permit activity, geological and geophysical costs, project generation and drilling costs, is expensed as incurred. Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable in respect of an area of interest, development expenditure is capitalised to the Statement of Financial Position.
8. INCOME TAX
The major components of income tax (benefit)/expense are as follows:
| Current income tax: Under provision for income tax in prior years Research and Development tax credits Deferred tax: Temporary differences relating to financial assets Total income tax (benefit)/expense reported in the statement of comprehensive income |
2024 $’000 2023 $’000 (43) (306) (1,312) (872) (1,355) (1,178) (3,768) 24 (5,123) (1,154) |
|---|---|
The prima facie income tax (benefit)/expense on pre-tax accounting result on operations reconciles to the income tax (benefit)/expense in the financial statements as follows:
| Loss before tax from continuing operations Income tax calculated at the Australian corporate rate of 30% (2023: 25%) Non-deductible expenses Income tax on financial assets Deferred tax assets and liabilities not recognised Change in tax rate Adjustments for under provision of tax credits Research and development tax credits Income tax (benefit) reported in the statement of comprehensive income |
2024 $’000 2023 $’000 (44,621) (66,756) (44,621) (66,756) (13,386) (16,689) 1,068 518 (3,768) 24 26,126 16,171 (12,940) - (911) (306) (1,312) (872) (5,123) (1,154) |
|---|---|
| 109
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
The tax rate used in the above reconciliation is the corporate rate of 30% (2023: 25%) payable by Australian corporate entities on taxable profits under Australian tax law.
corporate entities on taxable profits under Australian tax law. |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current tax assets comprise: | 2024 $’000 |
2023 $’000 |
||
| Income tax receivable attributable to: | ||||
| Parent Entity – refundable Research and Development tax offset | 2,215 | 872 | ||
| 2,215 | 872 | |||
| The following deferred tax assets and liabilities have not been brought to account: | ||||
| Unrecognised deferred tax balances | 2024 $’000 |
2023 $’000 |
||
| Deferred tax assets comprise: | ||||
| Revenue losses available for offset against future taxable income | 86,780 | 59,867 | ||
| Lease liabilities | 633 | 431 | ||
| Other deferred tax assets | 3,935 | 5,400 | ||
| 91,348 | 65,698 | |||
| Deferred tax liabilities comprise: | ||||
| Right-of-use assets | 453 | 290 | ||
| Other deferred tax liabilities | 3,629 | 212 | ||
| 4,082 | 502 | |||
| Income tax benefit not recognised directly in equity during the year: | 2024 $’000 |
2023 $'000 |
||
| Share issue costs | 1,267 | 1,538 |
Deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised in respect of these taxable temporary differences as the entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Material Accounting Policy
The income tax expense or benefit for the period is the tax payable or receivable on the current period’s taxable income based on the applicable income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences and to unused tax losses.
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantially enacted at the end of the reporting period in the country where the company’s subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. Provisions are established where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.
Current tax liabilities for the current period and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantially enacted by the balance date.
Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Unrecognised deferred income tax assets at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not profit or loss. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
Tax Consolidation
Chalice and its 100% owned Australian resident subsidiaries have formed an income tax consolidated group under the tax consolidation regime. Current and deferred tax amounts are accounted for in each individual entity as if each entity continued to act as a taxpayer on its own.
110 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended 30 of June 2024
Chalice recognises its own current and deferred tax amounts and those current tax liabilities, current tax assets and deferred tax assets arising from unused tax credits and unused tax losses which it has assumed from its controlled entities within the tax consolidated Group.
Assets or liabilities arising under tax funding agreements with the tax consolidated entities are recognised as amounts payable or receivable from or payable to other entities in the Group. Any difference between the amounts receivable or payable under the tax funding agreement are recognised as a contribution to (or distribution from) controlled entities in the tax consolidated Group.
9. NET GAIN ON SALE OF SUBSIDIARY
On 14 August 2023, the Group sold its wholly owned-subsidiary, Northwest Nickel Pty Ltd (Northwest) to Staveley Minerals Limited (ASX: STV) (Staveley). The consideration received was 10,840,608 fully paid ordinary shares in Staveley and $50,000 in cash. At the date of disposal, the net assets of Northwest was nil.
| Consideration: Cash Fully paid ordinary shares Less associated costs: Legal fees Net gain on sale of subsidiary |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 50 - 877 - |
|
| 927 - (67) - |
|
| 860 - |
10. LOSS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted loss per share
The calculation of basic loss per share for the year ended 30 June 2024 was based on the loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent of $39.5 million (2023: loss of $65.6 million) and a weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year ended 30 June 2024 of 379,257,185 (2023: 377,462,253).
| Loss attributable to ordinary shareholders Loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent from continuing operations Loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent for basic earnings Loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent adjusted for the effect of dilution |
2024 $’000 2023 $’000 (39,498) (65,602) (39,498) (65,602) (39,498) (65,602) |
|---|---|
Diluted loss per share has not been disclosed as the impact from options and performance rights is antidilutive.
ASSETS
This section provides additional information about those individual line items in the Statement of Financial Position that the Directors consider most relevant in the context of the operations of the entity.
11. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | |
|---|---|
| Bank balances and cash on hand Term deposits and at call accounts |
2024 2023 |
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 1,152 738 87,798 144,485 |
|
| 88,950 145,223 |
| 111
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
| (a) Reconciliation of cash flows from operating activities Loss for the year attributed to owners of the parent Adjustments for: Depreciation and amortisation Gain on sale of fixed assets Fixed assets written off Grant funding Net gain on sale of exploration assets Net gain on sale of subsidiary Shares issued to acquire an earn-in interest Income tax benefit Foreign exchange (gain)/loss Equity-settled share-based payment expenses Operating loss before changes in working capital and provisions Decrease in trade and other receivables Increase in financial assets Increase in trade creditors and other liabilities Increase/(decrease) in provisions Net cash used in operating activities (b) Non-cash financing and investing activities Additions/(modifications) to right-of-use assets Shares received on sale of subsidiary Shares issued to acquire a private property Shares received on sale of exploration assets 12. RECEIVABLES Trade receivables GST receivable Lease receivable Prepayments 13. FINANCIAL ASSETS Current Equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income: Listed equity investments |
2024 $’000 2023 $’000 (39,498) (65,602) 698 782 (24) (12) - 23 - (732) - (386) (860) - 2,450 - (5,123) (1,154) 6 (21) 1,957 2,708 (40,394) (64,394) 118 2,018 (25) (3) (3,567) 2,079 (221) 363 (44,089) (59,937) 2024 $’000 2023 $’000 (228) 44 877 - 3,600 - - 386 2024 $’000 2023 $’000 437 269 528 1,585 - 14 1,027 601 1,992 2,469 2024 $’000 2023 $’000 22,080 2,956 22,080 2,956 |
|---|---|
Listed equity investments held at 30 June 2024 predominately includes 27,331,579 ordinary shares in Encounter Resources Limited (ASX: ENR) (Encounter). In April 2024, the Company acquired a strategic interest in Encounter for $7.7 million with an average cost per share of $0.28. The market value of the shares at 30 June 2024 was $20.2 million or $0.74 per share.
112 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
| Non-current Bank guarantee and security deposits Warrants |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 512 558 36 38 |
|
| 548 596 |
Material Accounting Policy
Investments and other financial assets are initially measured at fair value. Transaction costs are included as part of the initial measurement, except for financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. Such assets are subsequently measured at either amortised cost or fair value depending on their classification. Classification is determined based on the business model that such assets are held.
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership. When there is no reasonable expectation of recovering part or all of a financial asset, its carrying value is written off.
(i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:
Financial assets not measured at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income are classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. Typically, such financial assets will be either:
-
(i) held for trading, where they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the short-term with an intention of making a profit, or a derivative; or
-
(ii) designated as such upon initial recognition where permitted.
Fair value movements are recognised in profit or loss.
(ii) Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income:
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) include equity investments which the consolidated entity intends to hold for the foreseeable future and has irrevocably elected to classify them as such upon initial recognition. Under FVOCI, subsequent movements in fair value are recognised in other comprehensive income and are never reclassified to profit or loss. Any gains or losses recognised in other comprehensive income are not recycled upon derecognition of the asset.
14. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| Cost At 1 July 2023 Additions Acquisition of freehold land and buildings(1) Disposals/write-offs At 30 June 2024 Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses At 1 July 2023 Depreciation charge Disposals/write-offs At 30 June 2024 Net book value at 30 June 2024 |
Plant, equipment Office furniture & computer Freehold land & |
|---|---|
| & vehicles equipment buildings Total |
|
| $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 |
|
| 1,570 1,680 43,863 47,113 50 187 - 237 - - 7,999 7,999 (125) (2) - (127) |
|
| 1,495 1,865 51,862 55,222 |
|
| 476 590 260 1,326 205 245 130 580 (55) (2) - (57) |
|
| 626 833 390 1,849 |
|
| 869 1,032 51,472 53,373 |
(1) On 10 August 2023, the Group acquired one private property in close proximity to the Gonneville intrusion at the Gonneville Project. The property was acquired for consideration comprising $4.4 million cash (net of settlement costs) and the issue of 611,371 fully paid ordinary shares in the Company.
| 113
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
| Cost At 1 July 2022 Additions Transfers Disposals/write-offs At 30 June 2023 Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses At 1 July 2022 Depreciation charge Disposals/write-offs At 30 June 2023 Net book value at 30 June 2023 |
Plant, equipment Office furniture & computer Freehold land & |
|
|---|---|---|
| & vehicles equipment buildings Total |
||
| $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 |
||
| 1,098 1,698 44,021 46,817 372 65 8 445 145 19 (164) - (45) (102) (2) (149) |
||
| 1,570 1,680 43,863 47,113 |
||
| 297 390 81 768 221 284 179 684 (42) (84) - (126) |
||
| 476 590 260 1,326 |
||
| 1,094 1,090 43,603 45,787 |
Material Accounting Policy
Property, plant and equipment is measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses, if any. Cost includes the direct cost of bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for first use. The assets are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.
Depreciation is calculated on a diminishing value basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment. Land is not depreciated. The depreciation rates used in the current and comparative periods are as follows:
| « | Buildings | 2.5% |
|---|---|---|
| « | Plant, equipment and vehicles | 5%-40% |
| « | Office furniture & computer equipment | 6%-40% |
The assets' residual values, useful lives and amortisation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial year end.
An item of plant and equipment and any significant part initially recognised is derecognised upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in the statement of profit or loss when the asset is derecognised.
The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment at each balance date in line with the Group’s impairment policy.
The Group assesses the carrying value of freehold land at each balance date to ensure that the value represents the highest and best use of the asset – that is for mineral development. Should further exploration activities indicate that technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting mineral resources not be demonstrated, or should future mining operations cease, there may be an indication of impairment of the carrying value of land and improvement assets.
15. RIGHT-OF-USE ASSETS
This Note provides information for right-of-use assets where the Group is lessee.
| Amounts recognised in statement of financial position Right-of-use assets At cost Accumulated depreciation Net carrying amount |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 1,624 1,824 (115) (663) |
|
| 1,509 1,161 |
114 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
| Reconciliation At 1 July net of accumulated depreciation Additions Lease modifications Deprecation charge for the year At 30 June net of accumulated deprecation |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 1,161 1,483 88 44 643 - (383) (366) |
|
| 1,509 1,161 |
Right-of-use assets relate to office spaces leased by the Group, with the most significant being the Group’s corporate head office. The original lease has a three-year term, and during the reporting period the Company extended the lease for an additional three years, resulting in a modification to the recognised right of use asset.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
This section of the Notes includes information that must be disclosed to comply with accounting standards and other pronouncements relating to the remuneration of employees and consultants of the Group, but that is not necessarily immediately related to individual line items in the Financial Statements.
16. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
| Current Annual leave accrued Provision for long service leave Non-current Provision for long service leave |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 524 664 100 115 |
|
| 624 779 |
|
| 225 237 |
|
| 225 237 |
17. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
(a) Share based payment transactions
The expense recognised during the year is shown in the following table:
| Performance rights granted – equity settled Retention rights – equity settled Total expenses recognised as share-based payments |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 1,492 2,071 465 637 |
|
| 1,957 2,708 |
(b) Share Options
Share options may be granted under the terms of the Company’s Employee Share Incentive Plan (ESIP). Under the terms of the ESIP, the Board may offer options for no consideration to full-time or part-time employees (including persons engaged under a consultancy agreement), executive and non-executive directors. In the case of the directors, the issue of options requires shareholder approval. As outlined in the Remuneration Report, convertible securities shall not be issued to non-executive directors as a form of compensation.
Each share option entitles the holder, on exercise, to one ordinary fully paid share in the Company. There is no issue price for the share options. The exercise price for the share options is determined by the Board. A share option may only be exercised after that share option has vested and any other conditions imposed by the Board on exercise satisfied. The Board may determine the vesting period, if any. Where options are granted with vesting conditions, unless the Board determines otherwise, unvested options are forfeited when the holder ceases to be employed by the Group.
Typically, share options are granted under service conditions. Non-market performance conditions are not considered in the grant date fair value measurement of the services received.
During the year ended 30 June 2024 and 30 June 2023, no options were granted, however previously issued share options were exercised during 30 June 2023 as per below.
| 115
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
| Outstanding at the beginning of the year Exercised during the year Outstanding at the end of the year Vested/exercisable at the end of the year |
Weighted average exercise Weighted average |
|---|---|
| price Number exercise price Number |
|
| $ of options $ of options |
|
| 2024 2024 2023 2023 |
|
| - - 4.45 300,000 - - 4.45 (300,000) |
|
| - - - - |
|
| - - - - |
(c) Performance Rights
Performance rights issued during the year ended 30 June 2024, were issued under the Company’s ESIP. Under the ESIP, the Board may issue performance rights to eligible employees and directors. Each performance right represents a right to be issued an ordinary share at a future point in time, subject to the satisfaction of any vesting conditions. Unless determined otherwise by the Board, performance rights are subject to lapsing if the vesting conditions are not met by the relevant measurement date or expiry date (if no other measurement date is specified) or if employment is terminated.
No exercise price is payable and eligibility to receive performance rights under the ESIP is at the Board’s discretion. The performance rights cannot be transferred and are not quoted on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). There are no voting rights attached to the performance rights. For details regarding the vesting conditions of the performance rights refer to section 9.4.8 of the Remuneration Report.
A summary of performance rights on issue is as follows:
30 June 2024:
| Opening balance Issued Vested Lapsed/Forfeited Closing balance Share price at date of |
|
|---|---|
| Issue date | issue ($) Number Number Number Number Number |
| 2 September 2020 25 November 2020 26 November 2020 25 February 2021 2 September 2021 24 November 2021 5 September 2022 23 November 2022 1 February 2023 30 August 2023 23 November 2023 20 February 2024 |
726,805 - (545,100) (181,705) - 1.475 280,081 - (210,060) (70,021) - 3.78 7,500 - (5,625) (1,875) - 3.86 36,803 - (27,602) (9,201) - 4.57 262,321 - - (10,398) 251,923 7.32 65,531 - - - 65,531 9.59 654,292 - - (163,841) 490,451 4.45 228,938 - - - 228,938 4.95 121,775 - - - 121,775 6.33 - 738,701 - (72,352) 666,349 3.77 - 176,135 - - 176,135 1.465 - 175,000 - - 175,000 1.025 |
| 2,384,046 1,089,836 (788,387) (509,393) 2,176,102 |
116 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
30 June 2023:
| Opening balance Issued Vested Lapsed/Forfeited Closing balance Share price at date of |
|
|---|---|
| Issue date | issue ($) Number Number Number Number Number |
| 28 November 2019 2 September 2020 25 November 2020 26 November 2020 25 February 2021 2 September 2021 24 November 2021 5 September 2022 23 November 2022 1 February 2023 |
4,557,053 - (4,557,053) - - 0.165 800,958 - - (74,153) 726,805 1.475 280,081 - - - 280,081 3.78 7,500 - - - 7,500 3.86 62,014 - - (25,211) 36,803 4.57 281,927 - - (19,606) 262,321 7.32 65,531 - - - 65,531 9.59 - 708,478 - (54,186) 654,292 4.45 - 228,938 - - 228,938 4.95 - 121,775 - - 121,775 6.33 |
| 6,055,064 1,059,191 (4,557,053) (173,156) 2,384,046 |
The following table provides the assumptions made in determining the weighted average fair value of the performance rights issued during the financial year.
| The following table provides the assumptions made in determining performance rights issued during the financial year. |
the weighted average fair value of the |
|---|---|
| Weighted average share price at grant date Exercise price Weighted average expected volatility Weighted average performance period (years) Weighted average Vesting period (years) Expected dividends Weighted average risk-free interest rate Weighted average fair value per right |
2024 2023 |
| $2.899 $4.791 Nil Nil 65% 98% 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 - - 3.85% 3.27% $1.997 $4.171 |
The weighted average fair value of the performance rights outstanding at 30 June 2024 was $3.56 per performance right (2023: $3.64).
(d) Retention Rights
During the year ended 30 June 2023, the Board approved a one-off issue of Retention Rights to key technical staff and KMP (excluding the MD&CEO). As these incentives were issued as a one-off, no Retention Rights were issued during the year ended 30 June 2024.
The retention rights were issued under the Company’s existing ESIP, and each retention right represents a right to be issued an ordinary share at a future point in time, subject to lapsing if the vesting conditions are not met by the measurement date or expiry date (if no other measurement date is specified or if employment is terminated).
No exercise price is payable and eligibility to receive retention rights under the ESIP is at the Board’s discretion. The retention rights cannot be transferred and are not quoted on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). There are no voting rights attached to the retention rights. For details regarding the vesting conditions of the retention rights refer to section 9.4.9 of the Remuneration Report.
A summary of retention rights on issue is as follows:
| Opening balance Issued Vested Lapsed/Forfeited Closing balance Share price at date of |
|
|---|---|
| Issue date | issue ($) Number Number Number Number Number |
| 5 September 2022 1 February 2023 17 February 2023 |
632,929 - - (171,736) 461,193 4.45 50,739 - - - 50,739 6.33 52,490 - - (19,401) 33,089 6.21 |
| 736,158 - - (191,137) 545,021 |
~~|~~ ~~1~~ 17
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
The following table provides the assumptions made in determining the fair value of the retention rights issued.
| Weighted average share price at grant date Exercise price Weighted average expected volatility Weighted average performance period (years) Weighted average Vesting period (years) Expected dividends Weighted average Risk-free interest rate Weighted average fair value per right |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| - $4.71 |
|
| - Nil |
|
| - 98% |
|
| - 3.26 |
|
| - 3.26 |
|
| - - |
|
| - 3.27% |
|
| - $4.71 |
Material Accounting Policy
The fair value of performance rights, retention rights and share options issued by the Company is recognised as an employee benefits expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The total amount to be expensed is determined by reference to the fair value of the performance rights, retention rights and share options granted including any market conditions (e.g. the company’s share price) and excluding the impact of any service and non-market performance vesting conditions (e.g. strategic objectives and service conditions).
The total expense is recognised over the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions are to be satisfied. At the end of each period, the entity revises its estimates of the number of performance rights, retention rights or share options that are expected to vest based on the non-market vesting and service conditions. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in profit or loss, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.
The value of share options and retention rights at issue date is calculated using a Black Scholes option valuation model. The value of performance rights at issue date is the fair value of performance rights calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation model (market-based conditions) and the Black Scholes option valuation model (nonmarket based conditions).
Share-based payment expenses are recognised over the period during which the employees provide the relevant services. This period may commence prior to the grant date, In circumstances where performance rights, retention rights or share options are subject to shareholder approval which is yet to be obtained at reporting date. In this situation, the Group estimates the grant date fair value of the equity instruments for the purposes of recognising the services received during the period between service commencement date and grant date. Once the grant date has been established (i.e. shareholder approval has been obtained), the Group revises the earlier estimate so that the amounts recognised for services received is ultimately based on the grant date fair value.
Material accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled share-based payments of options and retention rights at fair value at the issue date using a Black-Scholes Option model and performance rights are measured using a Monte Carlo simulation model for market-based conditions and the Black Scholes option valuation methodology for nonmarket-based conditions, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the instruments were issued.
The expected life of the share-based payments is based on historical data and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome.
The accounting estimates and assumptions relating to equity-settled share-based payments would have no impact on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next annual reporting period but may impact profit or loss and equity.
At each reporting period non-market vesting conditions in relation to performance rights and retention rights are assessed in order to determine the probability of the likelihood that the non-market vesting conditions are met.
118 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
This section provides additional information about those individual line items in the Statement of Financial Position that the Directors consider most relevant in the context of the operations of the entity.
18. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
| Trade payables Other payables Accrued expenses GRANT FUNDING RECEIVED IN ADVANCE Grant funding received in advance |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 794 1,704 - 50 2,401 6,197 |
|
| 3,195 7,951 |
|
| 2024 2023 |
|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 1,720 1,266 |
|
| 1,720 1,266 |
19. GRANT FUNDING RECEIVED IN ADVANCE
During the financial year ended 30 June 2024, the Group received $0.5 million (30 June 2023: $1.1 million) from the Commonwealth Government under a Cooperative Research Centre Program (“CRC-P”), with total funds received under the CRC-P from inception to date totalling $2.64 million. No revenue has been recognised in relation to this funding for the year ended 30 June 2024 (30 June 2023: $0.7 million) as the milestones under the CRC-P partners agreement were not completed or achieved.
20. LEASE LIABILITIES
| LEASE LIABILITIES | |
|---|---|
| Current Lease liabilities Non-current Lease liabilities |
2024 2023 |
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 243 363 |
|
| 243 363 |
|
| 1,869 1,364 |
|
| 1,869 1,364 |
21. ISSUED CAPITAL
| ISSUED CAPITAL | |
|---|---|
| (a) Movements in ordinary shares on issue Balance at beginning of financial year Shares issued on vesting of performance rights Options exercised – directors(1) Share placement Share purchase plan Shares issued to acquire a private property (refer note 14) Shares issued under an earn-in agreement (refer note 7) Share issue costs Balance at end of financial year |
2024 2023 |
| No. $’000 No. $’000 |
|
| 386,933,791 359,913 371,740,141 285,040 |
|
| 788,387 1,679 4,557,053 653 - - 168,449 329 - - 9,589,042 70,000 - - 879,106 6,420 611,371 3,600 - - 629,755 2,450 - - - (175) - (2,529) |
|
| 388,963,304 367,467 386,933,791 359,913 |
(1) In FY2023, 150,000 options were exercised by a director on a cashless basis for 18,449 ordinary shares.
Issuance of Ordinary Shares
Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time and are entitled to one vote per share at shareholders’ meetings. In the event of winding up of the Company, the ordinary shareholders rank after all other shareholders and creditors and are fully entitled to any proceeds on liquidation.
| 119
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
| (b) Share options On issue at 1 July Options exercised during the year Options issued during the year On issue at 30 June (c) Performance rights On issue at 1 July Performance rights issued Performance rights vested Performance rights lapsed On issue at 30 June |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| No. No. |
|
| - 300,000 - (300,000) - - |
|
| - - |
|
| 2024 2023 |
|
| No. No. |
|
| 2,384,046 6,055,064 1,089,836 1,059,191 (788,387) (4,557,053) (509,393) (173,156) |
|
| 2,176,102 2,384,046 |
At 30 June 2024 the Company had 2,176,102 performance rights on issue under the following terms and conditions:
| Series | Number | Terms | Expiry Date | Exercise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ||||
| $ | ||||
| FY2021-22 | 317,454 | The number of performance rights that will vest will be | 30 June 2026 | Nil |
| solely dependent on the Company meeting the outlined | ||||
| strategy objectives, absolute Total Shareholder Return | ||||
| (“TSR”) objectives and by comparing the Company’s TSR | ||||
| with that of a comparator group, as at the measurement | ||||
| date of 30 June 2024, as outlined in the Remuneration | ||||
| Report. | ||||
| FY2022-23 | 841,164 | The number of performance rights that will vest will be | 30 June 2027 | Nil |
| solely dependent on the Company meeting the outlined | ||||
| strategy objectives, absolute Total Shareholder Return | ||||
| (“TSR”) objectives and by comparing the Company’s TSR | ||||
| with that of a comparator group, as at the measurement | ||||
| date of 30 June 2025, as outlined in the Remuneration | ||||
| Report. | ||||
| FY2023-24 | 1,017,484 | The number of performance rights that will vest will be | 30 June 2028 | Nil |
| solely dependent on the Company meeting the outlined | ||||
| strategy objectives, absolute Total Shareholder Return | ||||
| (“TSR”) objectives and by comparing the Company’s TSR | ||||
| with that of a comparator group, as at the measurement | ||||
| date of 30 June 2026, as outlined in the Remuneration | ||||
| Report. |
| (d) Retention rights On issue at 1 July Retention rights issued Retention rights vested Retention rights lapsed On issue at 30 June |
2023 2022 |
|---|---|
| No. No. |
|
| 736,158 - - 800,499 - - (191,137) (64,341) |
|
| 545,021 736,158 |
120 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
At 30 June 2024 the Company had 545,021 retention rights on issue under the following terms and conditions:
| Series | Number | Terms | Expiry Date | Exercise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ||||
| $ | ||||
| FY2022-23 | 545,021 | The number of retention rights that will vest will be | 31 December 2027 | Nil |
| solely based on continuous employment with the | ||||
| Groupfor 3.5years(1 July2022 – 31 December 2025). |
22. RESERVES
| (a) Share based payment reserve Balance at beginning of financial year Equity settled share-based payments expense (refer note 17(a)) Performance rights vested (refer note 21) Transfers to accumulated losses Balance at end of financial year |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 3,977 3,235 1,957 2,708 (1,679) (653) - (1,313) |
|
| 4,255 3,977 |
(a) Share based payment reserve
The share-based payments reserve is used to recognise the value of equity settled share-based payment transactions provided to employees, including key management personnel, as part of their remuneration. Refer to note 17 for further details.
| (b) Investment revaluation reserve Balance at beginning of financial year Realised loss on sale of financial assets(1) Fair value movement on revaluation of financial assets(2) Tax effect on investment revaluations and disposals Transfers to accumulated losses Balance at end of financial year |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| (655) (45) |
|
| (68) - 11,246 (634) (3,767) 24 |
|
| 7,411 (610) 127 - |
|
| 6,883 (655) |
(b) Investment revaluation reserve
-
(1) Realised loss on sale of financial assets for the year ended 30 June 2024, represents the net loss on sale (before tax) of the Company’s shareholdings in various listed entities.
-
(2) Fair value movements on revaluation of financial assets represents the movements in fair value of the Company’s equity investments.
(c) Foreign currency translation reserve
The foreign currency reserve is used to record exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries. It is also used to record the effect of exchange variances resulting from net investments in foreign operations. Total foreign currency translation reserve balance at 30 June 2024 was $0.1 million (30 June 2023: $0.1 million).
All movements in the above reserves are as stated in the consolidated statement of changes in equity.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
This section of the Notes discusses the Group’s exposure to various risks and shows how these could affect the Group’s financial position and performance.
23. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a) Capital risk management
The capital structure of the Group consists of equity attributable to equity holders, comprising issued capital, reserves and accumulated losses as disclosed in notes 21-22.
The Board reviews the capital structure on a regular basis and considers the cost of capital and the risks associated with each class of capital. The Group will balance its overall capital structure through new share issues as well as the issue of debt, if the need arises.
(b) Market risk exposures
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices such as foreign exchange rates, equity prices and interest rates will have on the Group’s income or value of its holdings of financial instruments.
| 121
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
(i) Foreign exchange rate risk
The Group undertakes certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies, hence exposures to exchange rate fluctuations arise. The Group does not hedge this exposure. The cash at bank held by the Company currently comprises predominately of Australian dollar (“AUD”), with minimal funds held in Canadian dollar (“CAD”) funds.
The Group manages its foreign exchange risk by constantly reviewing its exposure and ensuring that there are appropriate cash balances in order to meet its likely future commitments in each currency where applicable. As the Company held approximately CAD $0.1 million at (30 June 2023: CAD $0.1 million), and with focus on projects within Australia, the Company’s exposure to movements in foreign currency is minimal.
(ii) Equity prices
The Group has exposure to equity prices through its holdings in various listed entities. The following table outlines the impact of increases/decreases in the value of the Company’s investment holding on the components of equity. The sensitivity analysis uses a variance of 10% movement upwards and down on the year end closing share prices.
| Impact on equity Share price +10% Share price -10% |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 2,208 (2,208) 294 (268) |
(iii) Interest rate risk
At reporting date, the Group’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Group’s short-term cash deposits. The Group is not exposed to cash flow volatility from interest rate changes on borrowings, as it does not have any short or long term borrowings.
Chalice constantly analyses its exposures to interest rates, with consideration given to potential renewal of existing positions and the period to which deposits may be fixed. The Group considers preservation of capital as the primary objective as opposed to maximising interest rate yields by investing in higher risk investments.
At reporting date, the following financial assets were exposed to fluctuations in interest rates:
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 88,950 145,223 |
Based on the financial instruments held at 30 June 2024, if interest rates had increased by 50 basis points or decreased by 20 basis points from the year end rates, with all other variables held constant, loss and equity for the year would have been $439,000 lower/$178,000 higher (2023: $697,000 lower/$281,000 higher based on a 50 basis point increase and a decrease of 20 basis point to the year-end rates).
(c) Credit risk exposure
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations.
The maximum exposure to credit risk, excluding the value of any collateral or other security, at balance date to recognised financial assets is the carrying amount, net of any allowance for doubtful debts, as disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
It is not the Company’s policy to securitise its trade and other receivables, however, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis. In addition, the Company currently diversifies its cash holdings across three of the main Australian financial institutions.
(d) Liquidity risk exposure
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Board of Directors actively monitors the Group’s ability to pay its debts as and when they fall due by regularly reviewing the current and forecast cash position based on the expected future activities.
The Group has non-derivative financial liabilities and lease liabilities which include trade and other payables of $3.4 million (2023: $7.9 million) all of which are due within 60 days.
In light of the Group’s current financial assets and minimal committed expenditure, the Group could continue to operate as a going concern for a considerable period of time, subject to any changes to the Group structure or undertaking a material transaction.
122 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
(e) Fair value of financial instruments
The Directors consider the carrying value of the financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the consolidated financial statements approximate their fair values. In particular, equity investments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income are measured at fair value using quoted market prices at the reporting date (Level 1 fair value measurement).
Where applicable, non-listed equity investments are measured at fair value using unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value measurement).
The directors have assessed that the fair value of cash and short-term deposits, trade receivables, trade payables and other current liabilities approximate their carrying amounts largely due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Material Accounting Policy
The Group measures financial instruments at fair value at each balance sheet date.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either:
- « In the principal market for the asset or liability; or
« In the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Group.
The Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximise the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
-
« Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
-
« Level 2 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable.
-
« Level 3 - Valuation technique for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable.
For the purpose of fair value disclosures, the Group has determined classes of assets and liabilities on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy, as explained above.
| 123
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
GROUP COMPOSITION
This section of the Notes includes information that must be disclosed to comply with accounting standards and other pronouncements relating to the structure of the Group, but that is not immediately related to individual line items in the Financial Statements.
24. PARENT ENTITY
| Financial position Assets Current assets Non-current assets Total assets Liabilities Current liabilities Non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity Issued capital Accumulated losses Reserves Total equity Financial performance Loss for the year Total comprehensive loss |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 114,326 150,434 54,145 43,193 |
|
| 168,471 193,627 |
|
| 3,817 5,822 2,090 1,636 |
|
| 5,907 7,458 |
|
| 162,564 186,169 |
|
| 367,467 359,913 (240,518) (201,463) 35,615 27,719 |
|
| 162,564 186,169 |
|
| 2024 2023 |
|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| (38,928) (67,288) |
|
| (38,928) (67,288) |
Commitments and contingencies
(i) Contingencies
Other than as disclosed in note 28 the parent entity has no contingent assets or liabilities.
(ii) Capital commitments
Other than as disclosed in note 28, the parent entity has no capital commitments.
124 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
25. LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
Significant investments in subsidiaries
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Chalice Mining Limited and its subsidiaries listed in the following table:
| Country of | % Equity Interest |
|---|---|
| Name of entity Incorporation |
2024 2023 |
| CGM (Lithium) Pty Ltd Australia CGM (Julimar) Pty Ltd Australia CGM (South Yilgarn) Pty Ltd Australia CGM (WA) Pty Ltd Australia CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd Australia Chalice Gold Mines (Ontario) Inc_._ Canada Chalice Operations Pty Ltd Australia Nebula Resources Pty Ltd Australia North West Nickel Pty Ltd(1) Australia Western Rift PtyLtd Australia |
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 - 100 100 100 |
(1) In August 2023, the Company sold Northwest Nickel Pty Ltd (Norwest) to Staveley Minerals Limited. Refer to note 9 for further details.
Material Accounting Policy
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Chalice Mining Limited (“Company” or “Parent”) and its subsidiaries as at 30 June each year (the “Group”). Interests in associates are equity accounted and are not part of the consolidated Group.
Subsidiaries are all those entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.
Special purpose entities are those entities over which the Group has no ownership interest but in effect the substance of the relationship is such that the Group controls the entity so as to obtain the majority of benefits from its operation.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been eliminated in full.
Subsidiaries and special purpose entities are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Company and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Group.
Investments in subsidiaries held by Chalice Mining Limited are accounted for at cost in the financial statements of the parent entity less any impairment charges.
OTHER INFORMATION
This section of the Notes includes other information that must be disclosed to comply with accounting standards and other pronouncements, but that is not immediately related to individual line items in the Financial Statements.
26. AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION
| AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION | |
|---|---|
| Audit services HLB Mann Judd: Audit and review of financial reports Other services |
2024 2023 |
| $ $ |
|
| 82,756 85,255 - - |
|
| 82,756 85,255 |
| 125
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
27. RELATED PARTIES
Key management personnel
Executive Directors
Alex Dorsch (MD&CEO)
Non-executive Directors
Derek La Ferla (Chair) Morgan Ball to 31 March 2024 Garret Dixon Stephen McIntosh Linda Kenyon Jo Gaines
Executives
Chris MacKinnon (Chief Financial Officer)
Mike Nelson (General Manager – Development)
Richard Hacker (General Manager – Strategy & Corporate) (KMP from 1 July 2023 to 29 February 2024). Kevin Frost (General Manager – Exploration)
Bruce Kendall (General Manager – Exploration) to 30 April 2024
Soolim Carney (General Manager – Environment and Community)
The KMP compensation is as follows:
| 2024 2023 |
|
|---|---|
| $ $ |
|
| Short-term benefits Post-employment benefits Long-term benefits Share-based payments |
3,197,538 3,056,533 240,393 204,664 (19,426) 139,485 1,358,710 1,572,567 |
| 4,777,215 4,973,249 |
Individual director’s and executive’s compensation disclosures
The Group has transferred the detailed remuneration disclosures to the Directors’ Report in accordance with Corporations Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 4). These remuneration disclosures are provided in the Remuneration Report on pages 72 to 96 of the Directors’ Report and are designated as audited.
Loans to key management personnel and their related parties
No loans were made to KMP or their related parties.
Other key management personnel transactions with the Group
There were no other key management personnel transactions within the Group during the year ended 30 June 2024.
28. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Exploration expenditure commitments
In order to maintain current rights of tenure to exploration tenements, the Group is required to perform minimum exploration work to meet the minimum expenditure requirements as specified by various governments in order to maintain exploration tenements in good standing. Therefore, amounts stated are based on the minimum commitments known within the next year. The Group may in certain situations apply for exemptions under relevant mining legislation or enter into joint venture arrangements which significantly reduce working capital commitments. These obligations are not provided for in the financial report and are payable:
| Within 1 year Within 2-5 years Later than 5 years |
2024 2023 |
|---|---|
| $’000 $’000 |
|
| 5,485 3,001 2,265 2,410 - - |
|
| 7,750 5,411 |
126 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 of June 2024
Contingent asset and Contingent Liabilities
There are no contingent assets or contingent liabilities at 30 June 2024 (30 June 2023: nil).
29. EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO REPORTING DATE
On 30 July 2024, 20% of the FY2021-22 Performance Rights that were issued to KMP and employees in 2021 vested on the achievement of certain performance conditions measured over the three years ended 30 June 2024. On 31 July 2024, the Company issued 63,484 fully paid ordinary shares to CPU Share Plans Pty Limited as trustee of the Chalice Mining Employee Share Trust for allocation to the participants upon exercising their Performance Rights. Subsequent to vesting, 26,710 Performance Rights were exercised into an equivalent number of fully paid ordinary shares.
On 26 September 2024, the Company issued 3,523,565 FY2024-25 Performance Rights to Executive KMP and employees of the Company under the terms of the Employee Securities Incentive Plan. In addition, it was also resolved that Alex Dorsch, MD&CEO be awarded 696,458 Performance Rights on the same terms and conditions. The issue of the Performance Rights to Mr Dorsch is conditional on the receipt of shareholder approval to be sought at the Company’s 2024 Annual General Meeting.
Other than disclosed above, there has not been any other matter or circumstance that has arisen since the end of the financial year that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect, the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
30. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In the year ended 30 June 2024, the Directors have reviewed all of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board that are relevant to the Group and effective for the current annual reporting period.
The impact on the financial performance and position of the Company from the adoption of the new or amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations is not material. Any new, revised or amending Accounting Standards or Interpretations that are not yet mandatory have not been early adopted.
31. ADOPTION OF NEW AND REVISED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet effective have not been early adopted by the Group for the year ended 30 June 2024
AASB 2021-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Disclosure of Accounting Policies and Definition of Accounting Estimates makes amendments to various Australian Accounting Standards and AASB Practice Statement 2 Making Materiality Judgements change the way in which accounting policies are disclosed in financial reports. The amendments require disclosure of material accounting policy information rather than significant accounting policies and are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. Accounting policy disclosure has been updated in line with this standard. All other new standards had no material effect.
The Directors have also reviewed all Standards and Interpretations in issue not yet adopted for the period ended 30 June 2024. As a result of this review the Directors have determined that there is no material impact of the standards and Interpretations on issue and not yet adopted by the Company.
| 127
Consolidated Entity Disclosure Statement
| Australian | Foreign | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| or foreign | jurisdiction | ||||
| Ownership | Country of | tax | tax | ||
| Name of entity | Type of entity | interest | incorporation | residency | residency |
| Chalice Mining Limited (the Company) | Body Corporate | Australia | Australian | N/A | |
| CGM (Lithium) Pty Ltd | Body Corporate | 100% | Australia | Australian | N/A |
| CGM (Julimar) Pty Ltd | Body Corporate | 100% | Australia | Australian | N/A |
| CGM (South Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | Body Corporate | 100% | Australia | Australian | N/A |
| CGM (WA) Pty Ltd | Body Corporate | 100% | Australia | Australian | N/A |
| CGM (West Yilgarn) Pty Ltd | Body Corporate | 100% | Australia | Australian | N/A |
| Chalice Operations Pty Ltd | Body Corporate | 100% | Australia | Australian | N/A |
| Nebula Resources Pty Ltd | Body Corporate | 100% | Australia | Australian | N/A |
| Western Rift Pty Ltd | Body Corporate | 100% | Australia | Australian | N/A |
| Chalice Gold Mines(Ontario)Inc_._ | BodyCorporate | 100% | Canada | Canadian | Canada |
Chalice Mining Limited and its wholly-owned Australian subsidiaries have formed an income tax consolidated group under the tax consolidation regime.
128 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
Directors’ Declaration
-
In the opinion of the directors of Chalice Mining Limited (the ‘Company’):
-
a. the financial statements, notes and the additional disclosures in the directors’ report designated as audited, of the Group are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 including:
-
(i) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2024 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
-
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
-
-
b. there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
-
c. The statements and notes thereto are in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
-
d. The consolidated entity disclosure statement required by section 295(3A) of the Corporations Act 2001 is true and correct .
-
This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in accordance with Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2024.
This declaration is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Chalice Mining Limited.
Dated at Perth the 26th day of September 2024.
On behalf of the Board:
==> picture [69 x 46] intentionally omitted <==
Alex Dorsch Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
| 129
Independent Auditor’s Report
==> picture [131 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Members of Chalice Mining Limited
Report on the Audit of the Financial Report
Opinion
We have audited the financial report of Chalice Mining Limited (“the Company”) and its controlled entities (“the Group”), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2024, the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes to the financial statements, including material accounting policy information, the consolidated entity disclosure statement and the directors’ declaration.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
(a) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2024 and of its financial performance for the year then ended; and
- (b) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001 .
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Report section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and the ethical requirements of the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board’s APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including Independence Standards) (“the Code”) that are relevant to our audit of the financial report in Australia. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial report of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
We have determined the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report .
==> picture [290 x 78] intentionally omitted <==
130 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
==> picture [131 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
| Key Audit Matter | How our audit addressed the key audit | How our audit addressed the key audit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| matter | |||
| Accounting for share-based payments | |||
| Refer to Note 17 | |||
| The Group has various share-based payment | Our procedures included but were not limited | ||
| arrangements in place comprising options and | to the following: | ||
| performance rights issued with |
various |
||
| performance conditions and in varying tranches. | - | Reviewing the valuation of share-based | |
| The Group recorded a share-based | payment | payments entered into during the financial | |
| expense of $1.957 million for the year | ended 30 | year; | |
| June 2024. | - | Assessing the experience, qualifications | |
| and expertise of external valuers used; | |||
| We consider this to be a key audit matter due to | - | Considering whether the determination of | |
| the complexity of the varying share-based |
the current period vesting expense had | ||
| payment arrangements and the |
judgement | been correctly determined; | |
| involved in relation to the satisfaction | of vesting | - | Assessing whether management’s |
| conditions and allocation across vesting | periods. | determination of the likelihood of the | |
| various vesting conditions being met was | |||
| reasonable; and | |||
| Ensuring disclosures within the financial | |||
| statements and remuneration report were | |||
| appropriate. |
Other Information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Group’s annual report for the year ended 30 June 2024, but does not include the financial report and our auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinion on the financial report does not cover the other information and accordingly we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial report, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial report, or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of the Directors for the Financial Report
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of:
(a) the financial report (other than the consolidated entity disclosure statement) that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 ; and
- (b) the consolidated entity disclosure statement that is true and correct in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , and
| 131
==> picture [132 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of:
-
(a) the financial report (other than the consolidated entity disclosure statement) that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and
-
(b) the consolidated entity disclosure statement that is true and correct and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial report, the directors are responsible for assessing the ability of the Group to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Report
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report as a whole is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of this financial report.
As part of an audit in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
-
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
-
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.
-
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the directors.
-
Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as a going concern.
-
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial report, including the disclosures, and whether the financial report represents the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
132 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
==> picture [131 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, actions taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated with the directors, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial report of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
REPORT ON THE REMUNERATION REPORT
Opinion on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included within the Directors’ Report for the year ended 30 June 2024.
In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Chalice Mining Limited for the year ended 30 June 2024 complies with Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 .
Responsibilities
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
==> picture [85 x 26] intentionally omitted <==
HLB Mann Judd Chartered Accountants
==> picture [67 x 46] intentionally omitted <==
B G McVeigh Partner
Perth, Western Australia 26 September 2024
| 133
==> picture [98 x 277] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Further Information
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [299 x 758] intentionally omitted <==
134 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
ASX Additional Information
Additional information required by the Australian Securities Exchange Limited (“ASX”) Listing Rules and not disclosed elsewhere in this report is set out below. The information below was applicable as at 16 September 2024.
Substantial shareholders
The names of the substantial shareholders as disclosed in substantial shareholding notices given to the Company and the number of shares in which they have a relevant interest are:
| Percentage of | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of ordinary | capital held | |
| Shareholder | shares held | % |
| Timothy Rupert Barr Goyder | 40,574,195 | 10.43 |
| Paradice Investment Management Pty Ltd | 19,922,425 | 5.12 |
Issued Capital
The Company has 389,026,788 fully paid ordinary shares on issue and 16,427 holders of fully paid ordinary shares.
Other Unlisted Equity Securities on Issue
| Class of Security | No. Securities | No. Holders |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Rights, nil exercise price, (vested 30 June 2024) | 36,774 | 11 |
| Performance Rights, nil exercise price, (measurement date 30 June 2025) | 841,164 | 19 |
| Retention Rights, nil exercise price, (measurement date 31 December 2025) | 545,021 | 15 |
| Performance Rights, nil exercise price, (measurement date 30 June 2026) | 911,705 | 27 |
The unlisted securities above were issued under an employee incentive scheme.
There were no holders of unquoted equity securities, excluding securities held under an employee incentive scheme, where the holder held 20% or more of a class of unlisted security as at 16 September 2024.
Fully Paid Ordinary Shares - Distribution of equity security holders:
| Range | |
|---|---|
| No. Holders % Held |
|
| 1 – 1,000 1,001 – 5,000 5,001 – 10,000 10,001 – 100,000 100,001 and over Total |
6,049 0.71 5,232 3.66 2,124 4.22 2,737 20.37 285 71.04 |
| 16,427 100.00 |
Other Unlisted Equity Securities - Distribution of equity security holders
| Performance Rights Retention Rights |
|
|---|---|
| Measurement Date Measurement Date Measurement Date Measurement Date |
|
| 30 June 2024 30 June 2025 30 June 2026 31 December 2025 |
|
| No. No. No. No. |
|
| Range | |
| Holders % Held Holders % Held Holders % Held Holders % Held |
|
| 1 – 1,000 1,001 – 5,000 5,001 – 10,000 10,001 – 100,000 100,001 and over Total |
2 5.14 - - - - - - 6 29.77 - - 2 1.00 - - 2 37.42 5 4.66 7 5.62 - 1 27.67 12 53.65 16 57.23 15 100.00 - - 2 41.69 2 36.15 - - |
| 11 100.00 19 100.00 27 100.00 15 100.00 |
| 135
ASX Additional Information
Marketable Parcel
The number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel is 3,064 (based on a share price of $1.23).
Securities Exchange Listing
The Company is a listed public company incorporated in Australia. The fully paid ordinary shares of the Company are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange Limited (ASX) under the code “CHN”.
Voting Rights
All fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share. In accordance with the Company’s constitution, on a show of hands every member present in person or by proxy or attorney or duly appointed representative has one vote. On a poll every member present or by proxy or attorney or duly authorised representative has one vote for every fully paid share held. There are no voting rights attached to options, performance rights or retention rights until exercised.
Restricted securities
There are no restricted ordinary shares on issue at 16 September 2024.
On-market Buyback
No on-market buy-back is currently being undertaken by the Company.
Twenty Largest Ordinary Fully Paid Shareholders
| Number of | Percentage of | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | shares | issued capital |
| HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited | 58,740,850 | 15.10 |
| Mr Timothy R B Goyder | 42,040,195 | 10.81 |
| Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited | 27,230,176 | 7.00 |
| J P Morgan Nominees Australia Pty Limited | 17,495,948 | 4.50 |
| BNP Paribas Noms Pty Ltd | 7,456,367 | 1.92 |
| BNP Paribas Nominees Pty Ltd | 6,009,565 | 1.54 |
| Lunar Co Pty Ltd | 5,949,447 | 1.53 |
| Curious Commodities Pty Ltd | 5,250,000 | 1.35 |
| Warbont Nominees Pty Ltd | 4,631,673 | 1.19 |
| BNP Paribas Nominees Pty Ltd | 4,554,011 | 1.17 |
| HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited | 3,494,546 | 0.90 |
| HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited | 2,668,299 | 0.69 |
| BNP Paribas Noms Pty Ltd | 2,616,501 | 0.67 |
| AEGP Super Pty Ltd | 2,500,000 | 0.64 |
| Bremerton Pty Ltd | 2,383,010 | 0.61 |
| HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited | 2,077,424 | 0.53 |
| Brechin Pty Ltd | 1,630,678 | 0.42 |
| Merril l Lynch (Australia) Nominees Pty Limited | 1,622,093 | 0.42 |
| Mr Qiu Tu | 1,525,300 | 0.39 |
| Mr Richard James Anderson | 1,500,000 | 0.39 |
| Top Twenty Shareholders | 201,376,083 | 51.77 |
| Total Remaining Shareholders | 187,650,705 | 48.23 |
| Total | 389,026,788 |
136 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
ASX Additional Information
Share Registry Information
For information on your shareholding or related administrative matters please contact the Company’s share registry Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd at:
Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited GPO Box 2975 Melbourne VIC 3001 AUSTRALIA Telephone Australia: 1300 850 505 Telephone International: (+61 3) 9415 4000
Website: https://www.computershare.com/au
| 137
Company Directory
Directors
Derek La Ferla
Non-executive Chair
Alex Dorsch
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Auditors
HLB Mann Judd Level 4, 130 Stirling Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000
Garret Dixon
Non-executive Director
Stephen McIntosh
Non-executive Director
Company Secretary
Jamie Armes
Principal Place of Business & Registered Office
Level 3, 46 Colin Street, West Perth, Western Australia 6005
Home Exchange
Australian Securities Exchange Ltd Level 40, Central Park, 152-158 St Georges Terrace Perth, Western Australia 6000
Share Registry
Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd Level 17, 221 St Georges Terrace Perth, Western Australia 6000 Tel: 1300 850 505
Tel: (+61) (8) 9322 3960 Email: [email protected] Web: www.chalicemining.com
ASX Listing
ASX Code: CHN
ABN: 47 116 648 956
138 | Chalice Mining Annual Report 2024
==> picture [548 x 777] intentionally omitted <==
| 139
==> picture [54 x 100] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [89 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [100 x 43] intentionally omitted <==
www.chalicemining.com
ASX: CHN