AI assistant
CGPC — Investor Presentation 2019
Aug 16, 2019
51765_rns_2019-08-16_f32905f7-3e89-431e-8dcf-5a94f948263d.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
華夏海灣塑膠股份有限公司 China General Plastics Corp. 8/16/2019 法人說明會
時間Time |
議 程Itinerary |
報告人Reporter |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
14:00〜14:30 |
貴賓報到VIP Registration |
|||
14:30〜15:00 |
2019年H1回顧及H2展望2019 H1 Review & H2 Outlook |
胡吉宏 副總經理Otto Hu, VP |
||
公司2019年H1財務資訊2019 H1 Finance Information |
郭建洲 經理C C Kuo, Manager |
|||
15:00〜15:30 |
Q & A | 林漢福 副董事長H F Lin, Vice Chairman |
||
==> picture [113 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
China General Plastics Corp. 2019 H1 Review & H2 Outlook
Reported by; Otto Hu August 16, 2019
==> picture [236 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
2019 H1 Review: Ethylene & EDC
Ethylene: Due to T/A, unexpected S/D and purchasing by SM producers, the ethylene hit $1,200 CFR NEA in Q1. The major users for PE and EG lowered down the operating rate because they were unable to afford the high cost. The market price started going down in Q2. EDC: The EDC supply in Q1 was tight due to lower outputs in US and Asia for export limit issues. The situation changed in Q2 for the increasing purchases for Braskem’s shutting down in chlor-alkali and EDC. So, the EDC prices in most H1 were high. However the higher operating rate in chlor-alkali was required later in May for more caustic soda import for Braskem and Alounorte. The EDC price were going down again eventually.
3
2019 H1 Review: PVC
The PVC demand in China and SEA were slow in Q1 for the uncertainty of trade war between US and China. Indian market was little better in Q1, but most buyers just focused the cheaper prices of deep sea cargos. The Asian PVC producers had a big pressure for high inventories. The situation in Q2 totally changed. The PVC demand in South Asia, SEA and North America had been recovering. In addition, the strong PVC import demand came from South America because of supply shortage in Braskem. The large PVC purchases happened in end Q2, which was never seen before.
4
2019 H1 Review: PVC/EDC Price Status
Unit: US$/MT CFR CMP(Platts)
==> picture [362 x 412] intentionally omitted <==
5
2019 H1 Review:
Consolidated Sales
- The consolidated net revenue was NT$7.582B, which decreased by NT$240M YoY .
Sales quantity: (KT)
| 2019 H1 | 2018 H1 | Growth |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| VCM | 22 | 27 | (5) |
| PVC | 190 | 185 | 5 |
| PVC product | 32 | 33 | (1) |
| Alkaline | 28 | 31 | (3) |
合 計 |
272 | 276 | (4) |
6
2019 H1 Review: PVC Sold by Month
==> picture [630 x 421] intentionally omitted <==
7
2019 H1 Review: PVC Sold in 3Yrs
==> picture [588 x 346] intentionally omitted <==
8
2019 H1 Review: Construction Products Sold in 3 Yrs
==> picture [633 x 371] intentionally omitted <==
9
2019 H1 Review: CSR Report Update
The CGPC 2018 CSR report had finished on schedule. We also got the certificate from BSI (British Standards Institution) on June 26, 2019.
==> picture [289 x 198] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [327 x 220] intentionally omitted <==
10
Crude Oil & Ethylene Monthly Ave. Prices
==> picture [712 x 358] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Unit:$/bbl WTI Unit: US$/MT CFR NEA (Platts)
----- End of picture text -----
11
PVC/VCM/EDC Monthly Avg. Prices (Platts)
Unit: US$/MT CFR CMP(Platts)
12
2019 H2 Review: Ethylene
The spot prices of ethylene and derivatives had a big drop for worrying about slow economics and weak demand after US announced on May 51 for 25% tariff on the commodities of US$200B imported from China. The C2 price in NEA hit $760 CFR, which was lowest in 10 years.
-
Exxon Baytown on fire on July 31 resulted in US spot C2 hit ₵19.50/lb. The crackers in Asia are running planned T/A in Q3. The tight supply pushes Asian C2 back to $900 above in NEA recently.
-
Even though Taiwan CPC T/A for #4 cracker starting from November, the C2 supply before end 2019 is expected long because T/A finish and commissioning of some expansions.
13
2019 H2 Review: EDC
-
The demand increase for caustic soda because Braskem shut down it’s chlor-alkali on May 9 and Alunorte was agreed by the government to increase running for another 50% on May 20. The O/R in US chlor-alkali had been seeing from 83 % in Mar/Apr, 86 % in May and 89 % in Jun.
-
The more EDC output in line with the high O/R in chloralkali made the spot EDC price had dropped to $225/MT FOB USG in July. The price in Asia was forced to adjust too .
-
The EDC price in H2 is relative to O/R of chlor-alkali majorly in US and Asia, PVC O/R and ethylene price. However, the further market price is expected to be stable to lower.
14
2019 H2 Outlook: PVC (1/3)
Owing to severe monitoring on both environment and safety by government, PVC productions have been limited this year in China. Less export and more domestic sales is the strategy for profit. The PVC import in H1 is 350kt with 3% increase YoY, but the export in H1 is only 280kt with 26% decrease YoY. The overseas PVC price softened in early H2, but the China domestic PVC price still keeps stable because of limited supply. The PVC H1 import in India is 1M tons with 10% increase YoY. The on going infrastructure projects, lower PVC ADD duty and season start of pre-monsoon are expected to pick up PVC demand in Q3 or later.
15
2019 H2 Outlook: PVC (2/3)
The SEA countries are on season in Q2. Vietnam has more opportunities due to the trade war between US and China. The PVC demand is expected 600kt this year, and half of the number will rely on import.
The PVC demand in Myanmar and Cambodia are improving this year. However, Bangladesh is even better in this area. The H1 PVC import in Bangladesh is huge. Bangladesh buyers are looking for more PVC cargos to arrive in August and September even though the PVC prices had been softening in early H2.
16
2019 H2 Outlook: PVC (3/3)
The unstable politic and economic situation in Turkey, sanction on Iran by US and overall weaker demand in middle East led PVC selling in this area not good. However, the PVC demand for pipe, fittings, wire and cable are getting better in Jordan, Yemen and Syria.
The overall better economic situation in H1 have supported PVC demand in South America. Owing to the shutdown for chlor-alkali and EDC by Braskem in May, more PVC imports have been requesting for this shortage. This is continuous business and issue even though the urgent shortage had been eased.
17
2019 H1 Review – Alkaline
The BIS certificate for caustic soda import to India and the production limit on Alunorte being lifted since May led chlor-alkali raise O/R especially in US. But caustic soda demand has been weak recently for the slow business in alumina industry. The spot price for caustic soda in NEA has dropped to the bottom that happened in early this year. However, the caustic soda price in Taiwan domestic market is still stable and can provide the contribution in the operation.
==> picture [235 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
US$/DMT
----- End of picture text -----
18
2019 H2 Outlook: PVC Products
In view of the global weak economics and uncertainty, Taiwan government strengthen the policies for infrastructure, which can consume more PVC pipe and construction materials. So, we are proceeding the upgrade projects for our extrusion machines in order to improve the production efficiency and output in H2 or later.
US announced the 10% tariff on the remaining US$300B of commodities imported from China since Dec. 15. Some items in the list are still relative to PVC materials. The impact to us is not so much because we already to run with market diversification for our products. In fact, our film and leather products for furniture, marine, car, stationery, medical sold to US have been increasing YTD.
19
==> picture [87 x 60] intentionally omitted <==
China General Plastics Corporation and Subsidiaries Finance information
Reporter : C.C.Kuo Manager Date : 2019, Aug. 16
==> picture [714 x 110] intentionally omitted <==
2019 1[st] Half Year Sales by product (NT$million)
==> picture [555 x 326] intentionally omitted <==
21
China General Plastics Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Income (In millions of NTD, except per share data)
==> picture [712 x 120] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2019 2018 2018 2017 2016
YoY%
HY1 HY1 FY FY FY
Sales 7,582 7,823 -3.1% 15,193 14,702 14,157
Cost of goods sold 6,778 6,053 12.0% 12,490 11,925 11,217
Gross profit 804 1,770 -54.6% 2,703 2,777 2,940
gross profit ratio 11% 23% 18% 19% 21%
----- End of picture text -----
2019HY1 |
2018HY1 |
YoY% |
2018FY |
2017FY |
2016FY |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SalesCost of goods sold |
7,582 6,778 |
7,823 6,053 |
-3.1% 12.0% |
15,193 12,490 |
14,702 11,925 |
14,157 11,217 |
|||
Gross profitgross profit ratio |
804 11% |
1,770 23% |
-54.6% | 2,703 18% |
2,777 19% |
2,940 21% |
|||
Operating expenses |
590 | 590 | 0.0% | 1,130 | 1,126 | 1,066 | |||
Operating income |
214 | 1,179 | -81.9% | 1,573 | 1,651 | 1,874 | |||
operating income ratio |
3% | 15% | 10% | 11% | 13% | ||||
Non-operating income(loss) * |
80 | 41 | 94.5% | 89 | (37) | (52) | |||
Income before income taxes |
294 | 1,220 | -76.0% | 1,662 | 1,614 | 1,823 | |||
Income taxes |
55 | 218 | -74.9% | 306 | 275 | 280 | |||
Net income |
239 | 1,002 | -76.2% | 1,356 | 1,339 | 1,543 | |||
net income ratio |
3% | 13% | 9% | 9% | 11% | ||||
Net income attributable to |
|||||||||
- China General Plastics Corporation |
234 | 924 | -74.7% | 1,276 | 1,270 | 1,443 | |||
- noncontrolling interest |
5 | 45 | -89.0% | 80 | 69 | 100 | |||
Earnings per share |
0.44 | 1.82 | -75.9% | 2.52 | 2.58 | 3.02 | |||
adjusted |
1.75 | 2.42 | 2.51 | 2.85 |
*note:Non-operating income(loss) included discontinued operations income(loss)
22
China General Plastics Corporation and Subsidiaries
Financial ratio analysis
| 2019 2018 HY1 HY1 Operatingincome margin(%) 2.8 15.1 Net income margin(%) 3.2 12.8 Debt ratio(%) 37 36 Current ratio(%) 222 269 Quick ratio(%) 146 199 Accounts receivable turnover 46 38 Inventoryturnover days 49 53 |
2018 2017 2016 FY FY FY 10.4 11.2 13.2 8.9 9.1 10.9 33 35 42 300 336 290 215 229 218 42 39 36 52 55 58 |
||||
| 2019 HY1 |
2018 HY1 |
2018 FY |
2017 FY |
2016 FY |
|
| Operatingincome margin(%) | 2.8 | 15.1 | 10.4 | 11.2 | 13.2 |
| Net income margin(%) | 3.2 | 12.8 | 8.9 | 9.1 | 10.9 |
| Debt ratio(%) | 37 | 36 | 33 | 35 | 42 |
| Current ratio(%) | 222 | 269 | 300 | 336 | 290 |
| Quick ratio(%) | 146 | 199 | 215 | 229 | 218 |
| Accounts receivable turnover | 46 | 38 | 42 | 39 | 36 |
| Inventoryturnover days | 49 | 53 | 52 | 55 | 58 |
23
This presentation includes the Company’s current information and any development or adjustments thereof will be published according to laws, regulations or rulings. The Company is not obligated to update or revise this presentation.
The information in this presentation is not for investment advices.
24
Thank You
25
==> picture [712 x 266] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Q & A
----- End of picture text -----
26