Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

CENTURIA CAPITAL GROUP Merger & Acquisition 2021

May 13, 2021

64677_rns_2021-05-13_8abd7303-f216-445d-9fb2-df1c4091cecf.pdf

Merger & Acquisition

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [594 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

PRIMEWEST GROUP (ASX:PWG)

ASX RELEASE

FRIDAY, 14 MAY 2021

PRIMEWEST LODGEMENT OF TARGET’S STATEMENT

Primewest today announces, that in accordance with steps 13 and 14 of Section 633(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 ( Cth ) ( Act ), it has lodged the target’s statement required under Part 6.5 Division 3 of the Act ( Target’s Statement ) with ASIC and ASX in relation to the takeover bid and merger proposal received from Centuria Capital Group (ASX:CNI) ( Centuria ) ( Offer ).

The Target’s Statement has also been provided to Centuria.

UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

The Primewest Board of Directors unanimously recommends that Primewest securityholders ACCEPT the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal.

Each of the directors, including founding directors John Bond, David Schwartz and Jim Litis, who with their associates collectively own 53% of total securities in Primewest, have confirmed they intend to accept the Offer subject to the same provisos as the Board recommendation.

Primewest has agreed to release the existing escrow arrangement which applies to the Primewest securities held by each of John Bond, David Schwartz and Jim Litis, so as to permit those directors to accept the Offer.

In addition, Primewest has established an Independent Board Committee ( IBC ), comprising independent non-executive directors Erin Flaherty and Hamish Beck, to represent the interests of minority securityholders generally. The IBC concurs with the Board’s recommendation.

INDEPENDENT EXPERT HAS CONCLUDED THAT THE OFFER IS FAIR AND REASONABLE

Primewest appointed Deloitte to prepare an Independent Expert’s Report (IER).

The independent expert has concluded that the Offer is fair and reasonable, in the absence of a superior proposal.

INDICATIVE TIMETABLE

The expected key dates in relation to the Offer are outlined below.

Key event Date
Target’s Statement and IER dispatched by Primewest
(alongside Bidder’s Statement dispatched by Centuria) Monday, 17 May 2021
Offer period opens
Offer period closes (unless extended or withdrawn) 7:00pm (Sydney time) Thursday, 17
June 2021

Note: All dates are indicative only and subject to change.

==> picture [596 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

ADVISORS

Primewest has engaged Moelis Australia Advisory Pty Ltd as its financial advisor and Hamilton Locke as its legal advisor.

-ENDS-

This release is authorised by the Board of Directors of Primewest.

John Bond David Schwartz Executive Chairman Managing Director Primewest Group Limited Primewest Group Limited

About Primewest

ASX listed Primewest (ASX:PWG) (a stapled group consisting of Primewest Group Limited (ACN 636 344 137) and Primewest Management Ltd (ABN 63 091 415 833, AFSL 250963), as responsible entity of Primewest Property Fund (ARSN 636 405 635)) is an Australian property fund manager with $5.0 billion of assets under management across all mainland states of Australia and on the west coast of the USA. Established in 1995, PWG is a value-add and often counter-cyclical manager, operating in the retail, industrial, commercial, residential, large format retail and agricultural property sectors with a focus to achieve maximum returns for holders of its stapled securities and investors in the underlying funds it manages.

Disclaimer

This announcement contains selected summary information and does not purport to be all-inclusive, comprehensive or to contain all of the information that may be relevant, or which a prospective investor may require in evaluations for a possible investment in PWG. It should be read in conjunction with PWG's periodic and continuous disclosure announcements which are available at https://primewest.biz/

This announcement is provided for general information purposes only. It should not be relied upon by the recipient in considering the merits of PWG, the Offer, or an investment in securities in PWG.

Forward Looking Statements

Primewest has prepared this announcement based on information available to it. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information, opinions and conclusions contained in this announcement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of Primewest, its directors, employees or agents, advisers, nor any other person accepts any liability, including, without limitation, any liability arising from fault or negligence on the part of any of them or any other person, for any loss arising from the use of this announcement or its contents or otherwise arising in connection with it. This announcement is not an offer, invitation, solicitation or other recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of any security, and neither this announcement nor anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment whatsoever. This announcement may contain forward-looking statements, guidance, forecasts, estimates, prospects, projections or statements in relation to future matters ( Forward Statements ). No independent third party has reviewed the reasonableness of any such statements or assumptions. No member of Primewest represents or warrants that such Forward Statements will be achieved or will prove to be correct or gives any warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, likelihood of achievement or reasonableness of any Forward Statement contained in this announcement.

The recipient should read this disclaimer carefully before reading or making any other use of this announcement or any information contained in this announcement.

3462-0339-9956, v. 1

==> picture [596 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

Not an offer of securities

This announcement has been prepared for publication in Australia and may not be released to US wire services or distributed in the United States. This announcement does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction. Any securities described in this announcement have not been, and will not be, registered under the US Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the United States except in transactions registered under the US Securities Act or exempt from, or not subject to, the registration of the US Securities Act and applicable US state securities laws.

3462-0339-9956, v. 1

==> picture [596 x 128] intentionally omitted <==

Attachment – Target’s Statement

3462-0339-9956, v. 1

==> picture [596 x 463] intentionally omitted <==

Target’s Statement

ACCEPT This Target’s Statement has been issued by Primewest in relation to a proposed merger with Centuria Capital Group, which is to be implemented via an off-market takeover offer (Offer) Your directors unanimously recommend that you ACCEPT the Offer in the absence of a superior proposal.

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT DOCUMENT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION.

Financial Adviser

Legal Adviser

If you are in any doubt about how to deal with this document, you should consult your financial, legal, taxation or other professional adviser immediately.

IMPORTANT NOTICES

Nature of this document

This document is a Target’s Statement issued by Primewest (a stapled group consisting of Primewest Group Limited (ACN 636 344 137) and Primewest Management Ltd (ABN 63 091 415 833, AFSL 250963), as responsible entity of Primewest Property Fund (ARSN 636 405 635)) under Part 6.5, Division 3 of the Corporations Act in response to the Offer made on 17 May 2021 by Centuria to acquire all Primewest Securities pursuant to the Bidder’s Statement dated 14 May 2021.

ASIC and ASX disclaimer

A copy of this Target’s Statement has been lodged with ASIC and sent to Centuria and ASX on 14 May 2021. None of ASIC, ASX or any of their respective officers takes any responsibility for the content of this Target’s Statement.

Defined terms

Capitalised terms used in this Target’s Statement are defined in the Glossary in Section 11. The rules of interpretation that apply to this Target’s Statement are also set out in Section 11. In addition, unless the contrary intention appears or the context requires otherwise, words and phrases used in this Target’s Statement have the same meaning and interpretation as in the Corporations Act.

No account of personal circumstances

The information contained in this Target’s Statement does not constitute personal advice. In preparing this Target’s Statement, Primewest has not taken into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of individual Primewest Securityholders. It is important that you consider the information in this Target’s Statement in light of your particular circumstances. You should seek advice from your financial, legal or other professional adviser before deciding whether to ACCEPT or reject the Offer.

Forward-looking statements

This Target’s Statement contains forward-looking statements, including statements of current intention or expectation. As such forwardlooking statements relate to future matters, they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed, projected or implied by such forwardlooking statements. None of Primewest or its directors, officers and advisers give any representation, assurance or guarantee to Primewest Securityholders or any other person as to the accuracy or likelihood of fulfilment of any forward looking statement, or any events or results expressed or implied in any forward looking statement, except to the extent required by law. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward looking statement. The forward looking statements in this Target’s Statement (including in the Independent Expert’s Report) reflect views held only as at the date of this Target’s Statement. Except as required by applicable law or the ASX Listing Rules, Primewest does not undertake to update or revise these forward-looking statements nor any other statements (written or oral) that may be made from time by or on behalf of Primewest, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Disclaimer as to information

The information on Centuria contained in this Target’s Statement has been prepared by Primewest using publicly available information (including information contained in the Bidder’s Statement) and has not been independently verified by Primewest. Accordingly, subject to the Corporations Act, Primewest does not make any representation or warranty (express or implied) as to the

accuracy or completeness of such information.

Independent Expert’s Report

The Independent Expert’s Report has been prepared by the Independent Expert for the purposes of this Target’s Statement and the Independent Expert takes sole responsibility for that report. Neither Primewest nor any of its officers, employees or advisers assumes any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the Independent Expert’s Report, save for in relation to the information which it has provided to the Independent Expert.

Foreign jurisdictions

The release, publication or distribution of this Target’s Statement may be restricted by law or regulation in some jurisdictions outside Australia. Accordingly, persons outside Australia who come into possession of this Target’s Statement should seek advice and observe any such restrictions. Any failure to comply with such restrictions may constitute a violation of applicable laws or regulations.

This Target’s Statement has been prepared in accordance with Australian law and the information contained in this Target’s Statement may not be the same as that which would have been disclosed if this Target’s Statement had been prepared in accordance with laws and regulations outside Australia.

Diagrams

Diagrams appearing in this Target’s Statement are illustrative only and may not be drawn to scale. Unless stated otherwise, all data contained in charts, graphs and tables is based on information available at the Last Trading Date.

Privacy

Primewest has collected your information from the share registry for the purpose of providing you with this Target’s Statement. Such information may include the

name, contact details and security holdings of Primewest Securityholders. Without this information, Primewest would be hindered in its ability to issue this Target’s Statement. The Corporations Act requires the name and address of securityholders and option holders to be held in a public register. Personal information of the type described above may be disclosed to Primewest, Centuria and their registries, print and mail and other service providers, authorised securities brokers, related bodies corporate and affiliates of Primewest and Centuria, and may be required to be disclosed to regulators, such as ASIC. Primewest Securityholders have certain rights to access personal information that has been collected. Primewest Securityholders should contact the Primewest share registry in the first instance, if they wish to access their personal information. Primewest Securityholders who appoint a named person to act as their proxy, attorney or corporate representative should ensure that they inform that person of these matters.

Rounding

A number of figures, amounts, percentages, prices, estimates, calculations of value and fractions in this Target’s Statement are subject to the effect of rounding. Accordingly, the actual calculation of these figures may differ from the figures set out in this Target’s Statement.

Primewest Securityholder Information Line

If you have any questions in relation to the Offer, please contact the Primewest Securityholder Information Line on 1300 943 885 (within Australia) or +61 2 8072 1488 (outside Australia) between 9.00am and 5.00pm (Sydney time), Monday to Friday (excluding national public holidays). Any telephone calls to these numbers will, as required by the Corporations Act, be tape recorded, indexed and stored.

Primewest Group

CONTENTS

Important notices Important notices Inside front cover
Primewest Chairman’s Letter 2
Key dates 4
Evaluation of the Offer 5
1. Frequently asked questions 6
2. Reasons toACCEPTthe Offer 12
3. Possible reasons for not following the Directors’ recommendation 20
4. Your choices as a Primewest Securityholder 22
5. Important information about the Offer 24
6. Information relating to Primewest 27
7. Director’s recommendation and information relating to Primewest’s Directors 32
8. Risk factors 38
9. Additional information 46
10. Taxation consequences 50
11. Glossary and interpretation 54
12. Authorisation 59
Appendix 1: Independent Expert’s Report 61
Directory Inside back cover

Target’s Statement 1

PRIMEWEST CHAIRMAN’S LETTER

14 May 2021

Dear Primewest Securityholder,

ACCEPT the Offer for your Primewest Securities, in the absence of a superior proposal

On 19 April 2021, Primewest (ASX:PWG) announced that it had entered into a bid implementation deed ( BID ) in relation to a proposed merger with Centuria Capital Group (ASX:CNI) ( Centuria ) to be implemented via an off-market takeover offer to be made by Centuria for Primewest (the Offer ). Centuria has today simultaneously released the Bidder’s Statement which contains further details of the Offer.

Under the Offer terms, Primewest Securityholders (other than Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders)[1] are being offered an implied $1.51 per Primewest Security ( Implied Offer Price ), consisting of:

  • $0.20 of cash per Primewest Security; and

  • 0.473 Centuria Securities per Primewest Security, equating to $1.31 based on Centuria’s closing price of $2.77 per Centuria Security on 16 April 2021[2] ( Undisturbed Date ).

In addition to the consideration offered by Centuria, Primewest Securityholders will also be entitled to the declared 2H21 distribution of 2.9 cents per Primewest Security if they are on the register at the record date for the distribution which Primewest has set as 25 May 2021. The Offer Price will not be reduced for the amount of the 2H21 distribution.

The directors of Primewest ( Directors ) unanimously recommend that you ACCEPT the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal. In addition, each of the Directors intend to ACCEPT the Offer in relation to all Primewest Securities they or their associates own or control, in the absence of a superior proposal. At the date of this Target’s Statement, Directors and their associates own or control 53% of Primewest Securities.

The Directors established an Independent Board Committee ( IBC ), comprising independent non-executive directors Erin Flaherty and Hamish Beck, to consider the merits of the Offer on behalf of minority Primewest Securityholders. The IBC concurs with the Directors recommendation to ACCEPT the Offer.

The Directors appointed Deloitte to provide an Independent Expert’s Report ( IER ) on the Offer. The IER is contained in Appendix 1 to this Target’s Statement. You are encouraged to read that report in full. In it, the Independent Expert has concluded that the Offer is fair and reasonable in the absence of superior proposal.

This Target’s Statement sets out the reasons for the Directors’ unanimous recommendation to ACCEPT the Offer. The Directors recommend this because:

  1. The Implied Offer Price of $1.51 per Primewest security is above its all time high trading price as at 16 April 2021 and represents an attractive premium:

  2. 3.1% premium to Primewest’s last close of $1.465 per Primewest Security on the Undisturbed Date;

  3. 7.0% premium to Primewest’s 5-day VWAP of $1.412 per Primewest Security on the Undisturbed Date;

  4. 11.8% premium to Primewest’s 30-day VWAP of $1.35 per Primewest Security on the Undisturbed Date; and

  5. 51.0% premium to Primewest’s IPO offer price of $1.00 per Primewest Security on 8 November 2019.

  6. The Offer delivers Primewest Securityholders material earnings per security ( EPS ) accretion of an estimated 19% on a pro forma FY21 basis[3] .

  7. The Offer provides new exposure to an enlarged Combined Group with multiple benefits.

  8. The Independent Expert has concluded that the Offer is fair and reasonable, in the absence of a superior proposal.

  9. No superior proposal has emerged as at the date of this Target’s Statement.

The Offer is subject to a number of conditions, including Centuria acquiring a relevant interest in at least 90% of all Primewest Securities and other conditions as outlined in the Bidder’s Statement. In deciding whether and when to ACCEPT the Offer, you should consider the conditions remaining to be satisfied.

2 Primewest Group

PRIMEWEST CHAIRMAN’S LETTER

To ACCEPT the Offer, you should carefully follow the instructions in Section 5 of the Offer Terms in Appendix 1 of the Bidder’s Statement and instruct your broker to do so or complete the acceptance form enclosed within the Bidder’s Statement (depending on the nature of your holding).

The offer period is due to end at 7:00pm (Sydney time) on 17 June 2021 unless extended or withdrawn.

I urge you to read this Target’s Statement in its entirety and carefully consider the Offer, having regard to your own personal risk profile, investment strategy and tax position. You should seek independent financial, legal, taxation or other professional advice if you are in any doubt as to what you should do in response to the Offer.

The Directors will keep you fully informed if there are any material developments through further ASX announcements of other supplementary documents.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your support of Primewest.

Yours sincerely

John Bond Executive Chairman

  1. Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders will instead receive the net cash proceeds of sale of the Centuria Securities to which they otherwise would have been entitled, which may be more or less than $1.31 per Centuria Security

  2. 16 April 2021 was the last trading day prior to the announcement of the Offer

  3. Pro forma impact assuming the proposed merger had occurred on 1 July 2020. Based on the mid-point of Centuria’s FY21 EPS guidance of 11.5–12.5cps; Primewest’s FY21 EPS guidance of 5.8cps (as per Primewest announcement on 19 April 2021); Centuria’s aggregate estimated post-tax synergies of $5.3 million per annum assuming Centuria acquired 100% of Primewest Securities; and assumes cash consideration of $0.20 is reinvested at Centuria’s closing price of $2.77 on 16 April 2021

Target’s Statement

3

KEY DATES

==> picture [483 x 118] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Date of this Target’s Statement 14 May 2021
Date of the Offer 17 May 2021
Record Date for Primewest’s 2H21 distribution 25 May 2021
Close of the Offer (unless extended or withdrawn) 7:00pm (Sydney time) on 17 June 2021
----- End of picture text -----

4 Primewest Group

EVALUATION OF THE OFFER

1

2

3

4

5

6

The Implied Offer Price represents an attractive premium to the trading price of Primewest Securities

The Offer delivers Primewest Securityholders material EPS accretion of an estimated 19% on a pro forma FY21 basis

The Offer provides continued exposure to Primewest and new exposure to an enlarged Combined Group with multiple benefits

The Independent Expert has concluded that the Offer is fair and reasonable, in the absence of a superior proposal

No superior proposal has emerged as at the date of this Target’s Statement

The Offer has the unanimous support of the Directors, who together hold 53% of Primewest Securities

==> picture [596 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 1 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Primewest Group

6

1. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

==> picture [483 x 639] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Question Answer For more
information
What is this Target’s This Target’s Statement is Primewest’s formal response to the Bidder’s
Statement and why Statement issued by Centuria as required by the Corporations Act. This
have I received this document contains important information regarding the Offer and should
document? be read in its entirety.
You have received this Target’s Statement because you are a Primewest
Securityholder.
This Target’s Statement includes the recommendation of the Directors to
ACCEPT the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal.
Who is making the Centuria is making the Offer. Section 5.2
Offer?
Centuria is an ASX-listed specialist investment manager with a 35 year
track-record of delivering a range of products and services to investors,
advisers and securityholders.
Based on pro forma AUM as at 31 December 2020 and adjusted for post
balance date revaluations and acquisitions, Centuria has $10.5 billion in
AUM, centred around property funds management and investment bonds.
Please see Section 4 of the Bidder’s statement for further details.
Does Centuria already No, Centuria has no pre-existing interest in Primewest Securities.
have an interest in
Primewest Securities?
What is the Bidder’s The Bidder’s Statement is a document prepared by Centuria stating the
Statement? terms of the Offer. The Bidder’s Statement was lodged with ASIC and
ASX and released to the ASX today, being the 14 May 2021.
What is the Offer? Centuria is offering to buy all of your Primewest Securities by way of an Section 5.1
off-market takeover bid.
What is Centuria Centuria is offering a mixed consideration of $0.20 cash per Primewest Section 5.1
offering per Primewest Security and 0.473 Centuria Securities per Primewest Security. Based
Security? on the Centuria last close of $2.77 per security as at 16 April 2021, the
Implied Offer Price is $1.51 per Primewest Security, representing a:
• 3.1% premium to Primewest’s last close of $1.465 per Primewest
Security on the Undisturbed Date;
• 7.0% premium to Primewest’s undisturbed 5-day VWAP of $1.412 per
Primewest Security on the Undisturbed Date;
• 11.8% premium to Primewest’s undisturbed 30-day VWAP of $1.35 per
Primewest Security on the Undisturbed Date; and
• 51.0% premium to Primewest’s initial public offer price of $1.00 per
Primewest Security on 8 November 2019.
Primewest Securityholders will also be entitled to the declared 2H21
distribution of 2.9 cents per Primewest Security if they are on the register at
the record date for the distribution which Primewest has set as 25 May 2021.
The Offer Price will not be reduced for the amount of the 2H21 distribution.
If you are an Ineligible Foreign Securityholder or an Unmarketable Parcel
Securityholder, you will not be provided with Centuria Securities. Instead,
you will be paid by the Nominee the net proceeds of the sale of the
Centuria Securities you would have been entitled to.
----- End of picture text -----

Target’s Statement

7

  1. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

==> picture [483 x 648] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Question Answer For more
information
What are the key • Transaction announced 19 April 2021
dates? • Offer period opens 17 May 2021
• Record date for Primewest’s full year distribution 25 May 2021
• Offer period closes 17 June 2021 (unless extended or withdrawn
What is the Offer There is a minimum 1 month offer period, with potential for extension to a Section 5.1
period? maximum of 12 months. The offer period will open 17 May 2021 and close
17 June 2021 (unless extended or withdrawn).
What are the conditions The Offer is conditional upon a number of matters set out in the Bidder’s Section 5.6
of the Offer? Statement including:
• minimum acceptance of at least 90% of all Primewest Securities;
• no material adverse change in relation to Primewest;
• no prescribed occurrence in relation to Primewest;
• receipt of certain regulatory approvals;
• no regulatory actions; and
• other customary conditions.
Please see Appendix 2 of the Bidder’s Statement for further information.
Can the Offer be Centuria may only withdraw the Offer with written consent of ASIC which Section 5.1
withdrawn? may be given subject to conditions.
What happens if the You do not get paid for your Primewest Securities while the Offer is
conditions of the Offer subject to conditions. If the conditions are not satisfied or waived before
are not satisfied or the Offer closes, the Offer will lapse. You would then be free to deal your
waived? Primewest Securities even if you had accepted the Offer.
Please see Section 7.3 of Appendix 1 of the Bidder’s Statement for further
information.
Can Centuria vary the Yes. Centuria can vary the Offer by extending the Offer Period or
Offer? increasing the Offer Price in accordance with the Corporations Act.
Centuria can waive the conditions to the Offer. However, Centuria has
no obligation to do so. Centuria has agreed that the 90% minimum
acceptance condition in the Offer will not be waived or reduced below
80% without the consent of the Primewest.
What happens if If you ACCEPT the Offer and Centuria subsequently increases the Offer Section 5.4
Centuria increases the Price, you will receive the increased consideration for your Primewest
Offer Price? Securities.
However, any increase in Offer Price will not be available to Primewest
Securityholders who have already sold their Primewest Securities on the
ASX.
What happens if there If there is a superior proposal from a third party, the Directors will Section 5.4
is a superior proposal reconsider their recommendation in relation to the Offer and advise
from a third party? Primewest Securityholders accordingly.
If you have already accepted the Offer at that time, you may be unable to
withdraw your acceptance in which case you will be unable to accept the
superior proposal if one arises.
----- End of picture text -----

8 Primewest Group

  1. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

==> picture [483 x 642] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Question Answer For more
information
When will I be updated If a condition is satisfied or waived, Centuria must, as soon as practicable,
about the status of the give the ASX and Primewest a notice that states that the particular
Offer conditions? condition has been satisfied or waived.
What choices do As a current Primewest Securityholder you can take the following actions: Section 4
I have as Primewest
• ACCEPT the Offer;
Securityholder?
• Sell your Primewest Securities on market (transaction fees may apply);
• Reject the Offer by doing nothing (noting that if Centuria acquires a
relevant interest in at least 90% of all Primewest Securities by the end
of the Offer Period, Centuria will be entitled and intends to compulsorily
acquire any Primewest Securities it does not already own).
There are several implications in relation to each of the above choices.
A summary of these implications is set out in Section 4 of this Target’s
Statement.
How will Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Section 5.3
Ineligible Foreign Securityholders that ACCEPT the Offer will not receive Centuria
Securityholders and Securities. Rather, the Centuria Securities that Ineligible Foreign
Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders would have
Securityholders be been entitled to receive will be issued to, and sold by, the Nominee
treated? and the net cash proceeds attributable to each Ineligible Foreign
Securityholder and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholder will be paid to
them in Australian dollars.
What is the The Primewest board unanimously recommends you ACCEPT the Offer Section 7.3
Primewest board’s from Centuria, in the absence of a superior proposal.
recommendation?
The reasons for your Directors’ recommendation are set out in Sections 2
and 7 of this Target’s Statement.
What do the Directors Each of the Directors intends to ACCEPT the Offer for any Primewest Section 7.4
intend to do with their Securities that they or their associates own or control, in the absence of a
Primewest Securities? superior proposal.
The Directors’ interests in Primewest Securities are set out in Section 7.5
of this Target’s Statement.
What is the The Independent Expert considered the Offer to be fair and reasonable, Section 7.2
Independent Expert’s in the absence of a superior proposal.
recommendation?
You are encouraged to read the Independent Expert’s Report in full.
Please see Appendix 1 for the full report.
How do I ACCEPT the To ACCEPT the Offer, you need to follow the instructions outlined in
Offer? Section 5 of the Offer Terms in Appendix 1 of the Bidder’s Statement and
on the acceptance form.
Please see Appendix 1 of the Bidder’s Statement for further information.
How do I reject the To reject the Offer, simply do nothing. Please note if Centuria acquires Section 4.3
Offer? a relevant interest in at least 90% of all Primewest Securities by the end
of the Offer Period, Centuria will be entitled and intends to compulsorily
acquire any Primewest Securities it does not already own.
----- End of picture text -----

Target’s Statement

9

  1. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

==> picture [483 x 589] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Question Answer For more
information
If I ACCEPT the You may only withdraw your acceptance if, while the Offer remains Section 5.4
Centuria Offer, subject to the Offer conditions, Centuria varies the Offer in a way that
can I withdraw my postpones the time when Centuria is required to satisfy its obligations by
acceptance? more than one month.
Are there any fees if No brokerage fees or stamp duty will be payable by you as a result of Section 5.3
I ACCEPT the Offer? your acceptance of the Offer.
If you are an Ineligible Foreign Securityholder or an Unmarketable Parcel
Securityholder, the cash proceeds that you will receive (following sale
by the Nominee of the Centuria Securities that you would otherwise be
entitled to receive under the Offer) will be net of sale expenses.
see Section 12.3 of the Offer Terms in Appendix 1 of the Bidder’s
Statement .
What are the tax A general outline of tax implications is outlined in Section 10. It is noted Section 10
implications if I that these implications may be materially different if Centuria does not
ACCEPT the Offer? acquire an 80% or more interest in Primewest.
Primewest Securityholders should seek professional advice in relation to
specific tax implications relevant to their personal circumstances.
Can I ACCEPT the No. You can only ACCEPT the offer for all of your Primewest Securities. Section 5.1
Offer for only some
However, if you hold one or more parcels of Primewest Securities as
of my Primewest
trustee or nominee, you may ACCEPT the Offer as if a separate offer had
Securities?
been made in relation to each of those parcels and any parcel you hold in
your own right.
Can I sell my Primewest You can only sell all or some of your Primewest Securities on market on
Securities on market on the ASX if you have not accepted the Offer in respect to those Primewest
the ASX? Securities.
However, you will likely incur brokerage charges and, if you sell on
market, will not be able to participate in any superior proposal for
Primewest Securities if such a proposal is made, or in any increase in the
Offer consideration that may be made by Centuria. Additionally, the tax
outcome from selling some or all of your Primewest Securities on market
for cash may be different to accepting the Offer.
Can I be forced to You cannot be forced to sell your Primewest Securities unless Centuria Section 4.3
sell my Primewest acquires a relevant interest in at least 90% of all Primewest Securities
Securities? by the end of the Offer Period, in which case Centuria will be entitled
and intends to compulsorily acquire any Primewest Securities it does not
already own at the close of the Offer.
If your Primewest Securities are compulsorily acquired, you will receive
the same consideration for your Primewest Securities that you would have
received under the Offer. However, you may not receive the consideration
for your Primewest Securities until up to approximately 6 to 8 weeks, or
potentially longer, after the end of the Offer Period.
----- End of picture text -----

10 Primewest Group

1. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

==> picture [483 x 401] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Question Answer For more
information
What are the If you choose to reject the Offer and retain your holding in Primewest, you Section 9.2
consequences of not should simply do nothing.
accepting the Offer?
However, if Centuria holds a relevant interest in at least 90% of all
Primewest Securities on issue during or at the end of the Offer Period,
Centuria will be entitled under Part 6A.1 of the Corporations Act to
compulsorily acquire the Primewest Securities that it does not already
own, at the Offer Price.
If Centuria acquires less than 90% but more than 50% of Primewest
Securities and declares the Offer unconditional, you will be exposed to
the risks of being a minority securityholder in Primewest.
What are the risks Accepting the Offer and becoming a holder of Centuria Securities (unless Section 8.2
associated with you are an Ineligible Foreign Securityholder or an Unmarketable Parcel
becoming a Centuria Securityholder) involves a number of risks, many of which Primewest
Securityholder? Securityholders are already exposed to.
How can I get updates It is likely that the market trading price of Primewest Securities and
on the Primewest Centuria Securities will vary during the Offer Period.
Security or Centuria
You can check the market price for all ASX listed securities by visiting
Security prices?
www.asx.com.au. The ticker for Primewest Securities on ASX is PWG and
the ticker for Centuria Securities on ASX is CNI.
Who should I contact If you have any further questions in relation to the Offer, you can call
for further information? the Primewest Securityholder Information Line on 1300 943 885 (within
Australia) or +61 2 8072 1488 (outside Australia) between 9.00am and
5.00pm (Sydney time), Monday to Friday (excluding national public
holidays). Any telephone calls to these numbers will, as required by the
Corporations Act, be tape recorded, indexed and stored.
If, however, you are in any doubt about how to deal with this document,
you should contact your broker, financial adviser or legal adviser.
----- End of picture text -----

Target’s Statement 11

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 2

REASONS TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

Primewest Group

12

  1. REASONS TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

1. The Implied Offer Price of $1.51 per Primewest Security represents an attractive premium

Under the Offer terms, Primewest Securityholders (other than Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders) are being offered an implied $1.51 per Primewest Security consisting of:

  • $0.20 of cash per Primewest Security; and

  • 0.473 Centuria Securities per Primewest Security, equating to $1.31 based on Centuria’s closing price of $2.77 per Centuria Security on the Undisturbed Date.

The Implied Offer Price of $1.51 per Primewest Security represents an attractive premium as illustrated in the chart below:

IMPLIED OFFER PRICE PREMIUM[1]

==> picture [432 x 298] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Implied offer price ($1.51)
3.1%
7.0%
11.8%
51.0%
$1.47 $1.41
$1.35
$1.00
Undisturbed Undisturbed Undisturbed IPO offer price
last close 5-day VWAP 30-day VWAP
----- End of picture text -----

  1. Undisturbed prices as at 16 April 2021; Implied Offer Price equals cash consideration of $0.20 plus implied scrip consideration of $1.31 based on merger ratio of 0.473x and Centuria’s close price as at 16 April 2021 of $2.77

Target’s Statement 13

REASONS TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

The Implied Offer Price of $1.51 per Primewest Security is at a premium to any historical trading price of Primewest Securities since its IPO in November 2019[2] . Primewest Securityholders who acquired their Primewest Securities in the IPO of Primewest and who ACCEPT the Offer will recognise a:

  • 51.0% premium to the IPO price for Primewest Securities;

  • 60.9% total shareholder return;[3]

  • 38.6% per annum internal rate of return;[4] and

  • 53.7% share price outperformance against the S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT index (see chart below).[5]

IMPLIED OFFER PRICE PREMIUM TO HISTORICAL TRADING PRICE[6]

==> picture [432 x 301] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

PWG (+46.5%) S&P/ASX300 A-REIT index (rebased) (-7.2%)
$1.60
Implied offer price ($1.51)
$1.40
$1.20
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$0.00
Nov-19 Jan-20 Mar-20 May-20 Jul-20 Sep-20 Nov-20 Jan-21 Mar-21
----- End of picture text -----

  1. As at 16 April 2021, being the last trading day prior to the announcement
  1. Source: IRESS, as at 16 April 2021. Total shareholder return calculation is to the Implied Offer Price and includes all distributions paid by Primewest since IPO up until the date of this Target’s Statement, inclusive of the declared 2H21 distribution of 2.9 cents per Primewest Security

  2. Internal rate of return calculation includes all distributions paid by Primewest since IPO up until the date of this Target’s Statement, inclusive of the declared 2H21 distribution of 2.9 cents per Primewest Security. Initial cost based on the IPO price of $1.00 per Primewest Security and exit price based on the Implied Offer Price of $1.51 per Primewest Security

  1. Source: FactSet

  2. Source: FactSet, as at 16 April 2021. S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT index rebased to Primewest IPO offer price of $1.00. Primewest starts at $1.00 IPO offer price rather than last close on 8 November 2019

14 Primewest Group

  1. REASONS TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

2. The Offer delivers Primewest Securityholders material EPS accretion of an estimated 19% on a pro forma FY21 basis

The Offer is materially earnings accretive for Primewest Securityholders, delivering an estimated 19% EPS accretion on a pro forma FY21 basis with expected material synergies to support growth of AUM, expansion of property services across both businesses, removal of duplicated corporate costs and expected tax related synergies.

EPS ACCRETION[7,8]

==> picture [432 x 228] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

6.8 cents
+19%
5.8 cents
PWG standalone Combined Group (PWG Equivalent)
----- End of picture text -----

  1. Pro forma impact assuming the proposed merger had occurred on 1 July 2020. Based on the mid-point of Centuria’s FY21 EPS guidance of 11.5–12.5cps; Primewest’s FY21 EPS guidance of 5.8cps (as per Primewest announcement on 19 April 2021); and Centuria’s aggregate estimated post-tax synergies of $5.3 million per annum assuming Centuria acquired 100% of Primewest Securities

  2. Assumes cash consideration of $0.20 is reinvested at Centuria’s closing price of $2.77 on 16 April 2021

Target’s Statement

15

  1. REASONS TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

3. The Offer provides continued exposure to Primewest and new exposure to an enlarged Combined Group

Primewest and Centuria are high-quality, complementary funds management platforms that share similar investment philosophies and strong track records.

The Offer provides Primewest Securityholders with an enhanced investment proposition relative to Primewest on a standalone basis, given the reasons below:

(a) Substantial increase in scale and relevance

Substantial increase in scale and relevance with combined AUM of $15.5 billion[9] , representing a 209% increase for Primewest and making the Combined Group one of the largest real estate fund managers listed on the ASX.

INCREASED SCALE AND RELEVANCE[9,10]

==> picture [432 x 268] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

$48.5bn
Increased scale and relevance $46.4bn
$15.5bn $15.6bn
$12.9bn
$10.5bn
$9.7bn
$8.3bn
$5.0bn
$2.9bn
$1.7bn $1.9bn
HMC ENN APD PWG CMW MGR CNI GPT Combined DXS CHC GMG
Group
----- End of picture text -----

  1. Combined Group pro forma AUM figures as at 31 December 2020 adjusted for post balance date revaluations and acquisitions. Prepared on the basis of 100% acquisition of Primewest Securities by Centuria 10. Source: Company filings

Primewest Group

16

REASONS TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

(b) Enhanced geographic and sector diversification

Enhanced geographic and sector diversification, which allows the Combined Group to take advantage of a broader range of acquisition opportunities.

COMBINED GROUP GEOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN

==> picture [432 x 162] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Primewest Combined Group
5%
WA 6% [ 4%] 14% 23%
NSW 9%
QLD 5%
VIC 11%
SA 54%
16% 19%
New Zealand
16%
Other
18%
----- End of picture text -----

COMBINED GROUP SECTOR BREAKDOWN

==> picture [432 x 171] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Primewest Combined Group
6%
Office 12% 7%
Daily Needs Retail
11% 36%
Large Format Retail 43%
Industrial 28%
Healthcare
20%
Other
21% 8% 9%
----- End of picture text -----

Target’s Statement

17

REASONS TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

(c) Access to new distribution channels, including exposure to two large listed REITs

The merger will diversify fund types and fund sources for Primewest Securityholders. Specifically, Primewest Securityholders will gain access to a combined listed portfolio of $5.2 billion real estate AUM, including two large listed REITs, Centurial Industrial REIT and Centuria Office REIT, to compliment significant unlisted real estate AUM of $9.4 billion split across a total of 166 real estate funds.

See below fund types and capital sources for Primewest standalone and pro forma for the Combined Group.

REAL ESTATE FUND TYPES

==> picture [432 x 350] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Primewest Combined Group
6%
8%
Unlisted single-asset
36%
Unlisted multi-asset 14%
Unlisted multi-asset 48%
open ended
Listed
72% 8%
8%
REAL ESTATE CAPITAL SOURCES
Primewest Combined Group
6%
14% 29% 27%
Unlisted wholesale
Unlisted institutional
Listed
Unlisted retail 8%
80%
36%
----- End of picture text -----

18 Primewest Group

  1. REASONS TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

(d) Integration of two high-performing management teams

Founding directors John Bond, David Schwartz and Jim Litis will continue to lead the Primewest funds management platform and will join, as key members, the Centuria executive team.

Centuria’s current intention is to utilise Primewest’s existing employees given the strong expertise across a range of geographies and sectors to continue to expand the combined platform.

(e) Potential cost savings and synergies

Potential cost savings and synergies to support growth of AUM, expansion of property services across both businesses, removal of duplicated corporate costs and tax related synergies.

(f) Well placed for S&P/ASX 200 index inclusion

Combined Group expected to be well placed for S&P/ASX 200 index inclusion with an estimated pro forma market capitalisation of $2.2 billion[12] .

4. The Independent Expert has concluded that the Offer is fair and reasonable, in the absence of a superior proposal

The Directors appointed Deloitte to prepare an Independent Expert’s Report.

The Independent Expert’s Report has concluded that the Offer is fair and reasonable, in the absence of a superior proposal. Primewest Securityholders are encouraged to read the entire Independent Expert’s Report which is set out in full at Appendix 1.

Deloitte explains in the Independent Expert’s Report the factors that it has taken into account in reaching the above conclusion.

5. No superior proposal has emerged as at the date of this Target’s Statement

As at the date of this Target’s Statement, Primewest has not received any superior proposal from a third party, nor have any discussions occurred that the Directors believe are likely to lead to any superior proposal being made.

Were Primewest to receive a competing proposal after the date of this Target’s Statement, the Directors would need to consider all aspects of the proposal in determining whether it is superior to the Offer.

6. The Offer has the unanimous support of the Directors

At the date of this Target’s Statement, Directors and their associates own or control 53% of Primewest Securities.

  1. Based on Centuria’s close price of $2.77 on 16 April 2021 multiplied by securities on issue post-merger (assuming Centuria acquires 100% of Primewest Securities)

Target’s Statement 19

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 3 POSSIBLE REASONS FOR NOT FOLLOWING THE DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

20 Primewest Group

3. POSSIBLE REASONS FOR NOT FOLLOWING THE DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

This section sets out some reasons why you may choose not to follow the unanimous recommendation of the Directors to ACCEPT the Offer and instead reject the Offer.

1. You may believe that the Implied Offer Price is inadequate

You may disagree with the unanimous recommendation from the Directors to ACCEPT the Offer in the absence of a superior proposal and the Independent Expert’s finding that the Offer is both fair and reasonable. You may believe that the value of the Implied Offer Price under the Offer terms is inadequate.

2. You may want to sell your Primewest Securities on market

You may wish to realise your investment in Primewest through sale on the ASX if you expect proceeds may be higher, that you will be paid sooner, or if you prefer sale proceeds to be entirely comprised of cash. If you sell your Primewest Securities on market, you:

  • will lose the ability to ACCEPT the Offer or any other offer which may eventuate;

  • will not be entitled to receive any increased consideration if Centuria subsequently increases the Offer Price;

  • may incur brokerage;

  • will have a tax outcome that may be different to accepting the Offer; and

  • may not obtain sufficient buyers to complete a trade above the Implied Offer Price of $1.51 per Primewest Security (including because Primewest Securities may be affected by reduced liquidity).

3. You may consider there is the potential for a superior proposal to emerge in the foreseeable future

It is possible that a superior proposal for Primewest could emerge in the future. However, as at the date of this Target’s Statement, no such alternative proposal has been received.

Target’s Statement 21

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 4 YOUR CHOICES AS A PRIMEWEST SECURITYHOLDER

22 Primewest Group

4. YOUR CHOICES AS A PRIMEWEST SECURITYHOLDER

The Directors of Primewest unanimously recommend that you ACCEPT the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal, for the reasons set out in Section 1.

The Primewest board encourages you to consider your personal risk profile, investment objectives and tax and financial circumstances before making any decision in relation to your Primewest Securities. As a Primewest Securityholder, you have the following three choices available to you in relation to the Offer:

Option 1 – ACCEPT the Offer

If you ACCEPT the Offer, you must ACCEPT the Offer in relation to all of your Primewest Securities.

Refer to Section 10 of this Target’s Statement and Section 11 of the Bidder’s Statement for further details of the tax consequences of the proposed merger.

This course of action is unanimously recommended by the Directors of Primewest in the absence of a superior proposal. Primewest Securityholders who wish to ACCEPT the Offer should refer to Section 5 of the Offer Terms in Appendix 1 of the Bidder’s Statement for instructions on how to do so.

Option 2 – Sell your Primewest Securities on market

You can sell your Primewest Securities on market at any time if you have not already accepted the Offer.

If you sell your Primewest Securities on market, you:

  • will lose the ability to ACCEPT the Offer;

  • will not receive the benefits of any potential higher competing offer for your Primewest Securities, (though no forecast is made as to whether such events will occur);

  • may receive more or less for your Primewest Securities than the Implied Offer Price;

  • may incur a brokerage charge; and

  • may be liable for capital gains tax or income tax on the sale.

Primewest Securityholders who wish to sell their Primewest Securities on market should contact their broker for information on how to effect a sale. You should also seek your own specific professional advice regarding the taxation consequences of selling your Primewest Securities on market

Option 3 – Reject the Offer by doing nothing

If you do not wish to ACCEPT the Offer and want to retain your Primewest Securities, simply do nothing and take no action in relation to documents sent to you from Centuria. However, if Centuria acquires a relevant interest in at least 90% of all Primewest Securities by the end of the Offer Period, Centuria will be entitled and intends to compulsorily acquire any Primewest Securities it does not already own.

Target’s Statement 23

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 5

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE OFFER

Primewest Group

24

  1. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE OFFER

5.1 Summary of the Offer

Centuria is offering mixed consideration consisting of $0.20 cash per Primewest Security and 0.473 Centuria Securities per Primewest Security.

If you are an Ineligible Foreign Securityholders or an Unmarketable Parcel Securityholder, you will not receive Centuria Securities. Instead, you will be entitled to receive the net cash sale proceeds of the Centuria Securities that you would otherwise have been entitled to receive in accordance with the process outlined below.

The Implied Offer Price is $1.51 per Primewest Security, based on Centuria’s close price of $2.77 per security on 16 April 2021.

The Offer is open for acceptance from 17 May 2021 until 7.00 pm (Sydney time) on 17 June 2021. Centuria may extend the Offer Period at any time before the end of the Offer Period.

If, within the last 7 days of the Offer Period:

  • Centuria improves the Offer Price; or

  • Centuria’s voting power in Primewest increases to more than 50%,

then the Offer Period is automatically extended so that it ends 14 days after the relevant event occurs.

Before you ACCEPT the Offer, Centuria may withdraw the Offer with the written consent of ASIC and subject to the conditions (if any) specified in such consent.

You may ACCEPT the Offer only in respect of all (and not just a proportion of) your Primewest Securities.

5.2 The bidder

The bidder under the Offer is Centuria Capital Limited, acting in its own capacity and as nominee for Centuria Capital Fund. The directors of Centuria are listed in Section 4 of the Bidder’s Statement.

Centuria Capital Limited and the Centuria Capital Fund together constitute Centuria Capital Group (ASX: CNI), under an ASX listed stapled entity structure. Centuria’s funds management platform includes Centuria Property Funds, which specialises in unlisted and listed property funds, and Centuria Investment Bonds.

Centuria’s portfolio comprises over 215 properties with a value of $10.5 billion (as at 16 April, 2021) located in each of Australia’s States and the Australian Capital Territory in addition to New Zealand and diversified across sectors including healthcare, industrial and office.

Real estate funds management forms the largest component of Centuria’s business with $9.6 billion of assets under management. Centuria has exposure to the industrial, healthcare and de-centralised office real estate markets in Australasia and has an extensive range of property fund types ranging from listed funds to unlisted fixed-term and open-ended funds.

Centuria manages the ASX-listed Centuria Industrial REIT (ASX:CIP) and Centuria Office REIT (ASX:COF) which are Australia’s largest domestic pure play industrial and office real estate investment trusts, respectively. Centuria also manages the NZX-listed Asset Plus (NZX:APL), as well as a range of unlisted real estate funds comprising 63 single asset funds, 4 multi asset open-ended funds, and 5 institutional funds and mandates.

Centuria has maintained a dual strategy of growth by both direct real estate transactions as well as corporate acquisitions.

Refer to Section 4 of the Bidder’s Statement for further detail on Centuria.

5.3 How will Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders

Generally speaking, if your address on Primewest’s register of Securityholders is in a jurisdiction other than Australia, its external territories or New Zealand, you will be considered an Ineligible Foreign Securityholder.

Target’s Statement 25

  1. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE OFFER

If you are an Ineligible Foreign Securityholder or an Unmarketable Parcel Securityholder, you are entitled to ACCEPT the Offer just like any other Primewest Securityholder. Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders that ACCEPT the Offer will not receive Centuria Securities. Rather, the Centuria Securities that Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders would have been entitled to receive will be issued to, and sold by, the Nominee and the net cash proceeds attributable to each Ineligible Foreign Securityholder and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholder will be paid to them in Australian dollars.

5.4

Effect of acceptance

If the Offer is unconditional, your acceptance of the Offer is irrevocable and you are not entitled to withdraw your acceptance.

If you ACCEPT the Offer, you will lose your ability to ACCEPT a superior proposal, if one emerges, even if you consider the superior proposal to be more attractive. However, if Centuria were to increase its Offer Price to a higher sum as a result of a competing proposal being publicly announced at a time after you have accepted the Offer, you will be entitled to receive the improved consideration.

If you ACCEPT the Offer you will still be entitled to the declared 2H21 distribution of 2.9 cents per Primewest Security provided you are on the register at the record date for the distribution which Primewest has set as 25 May 2021. The Offer Price will not be reduced for the amount of the 2H21 distribution.

5.5

Receipt of consideration

If the Offer becomes unconditional, the Centuria will provide the consideration under the Offer to accepting Primewest Securityholders within 5 Business Days of the later of acceptance and the Offer becoming unconditional.

Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders will be provided with the net proceeds of sale to which they are entitled under the Offer at a different time.

5.6

Offer conditions

The Offer is subject to a number of Offer conditions. In summary, the Offer conditions which are yet to be satisfied or waived include the following:

  • (Regulatory Approvals) All necessary approvals that are required by law, or from any Government Agency have been approved on an unconditional basis before the end of the Offer Period.

  • (No Restraints) No regulatory action is taken in consequence of or in connection with the Offer between 14 May 2021 and the end of the Offer Period.

  • (Minimum Acceptance) Centuria having a Relevant Interest in at least 90% of the Primewest Securities (on a fully diluted basis).

  • (No Prescribed Occurrences) No prescribed occurrence between the Announcement Date of the Offer and the date three Business Days after the end of the Offer Period.

  • (No Material Adverse Change) No material adverse change to Primewest, its assets and business occurs.

  • (Conduct of business) Primewest Management Ltd conducting Primewest’s business in a certain manner between the Announcement Date of the Offer and the end of the Offer Period, including no material acquisitions, disposals, capital expenditure or changes in the conduct of business, with the exception of the Vitalharvest Transaction.

  • (Responsible entity, trustee and other change) During the Implementation Period, no material changes to responsible entity, trustee and control of Primewest, unless with the written consent of Centuria.

  • (Litigation) No litigation on foot or pending during the Implementation Period which may reasonably result in a judgement of $2,000,000 or more is commenced, threatened to be commenced, announced or made known to Centuria or Primewest.

The above is only a summary of the Offer conditions of the Offer. Please refer to Sections Appendix 2 and Section 7 of Appendix 1 of the Bidder’s Statement for a full description of the conditions of the Offer.

26 Primewest Group

==> picture [596 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 6 INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST

Target’s Statement 27

  1. INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST

6.1

Overview

ASX listed Primewest (ASX:PWG) is an Australian property fund manager with $5.0 billion[1] of assets under management across all mainland states of Australia and on the west coast of the USA. Established in 1995, Primewest is a value-add and often counter-cyclical manager, operating in the retail (daily needs retail and large format retail), industrial, commercial, residential and agricultural property sectors with a focus to achieve maximum returns for Primewest Securityholders and investors in the underlying funds it manages.

6.2

Strategy

Primewest operates over 84 separate funds across 7 different real estate sectors. The management of these funds and syndicates involves sourcing, acquiring, managing and disposing of real estate assets on behalf of investors. Real estate funds management is attractive to private high net worth and institutional investors because it allows for investors to acquire an interest in larger assets or diversify their investment exposure, options which may not be available for direct investment.

Primewest primarily generates revenue through fees charged to the funds that it manages including:

  • Asset management fees;

  • Property service fees including leasing fees, development management fees and finance fees;

  • Transactional fees including establishment fees earned on the acquisition of new assets and sales fees on the disposal of assets; and

  • Performance fees.

Primewest’s growth strategy has included:

  • Launching new income and development funds;

  • Entering into additional wholesale partnerships;

  • Establishing new funds in alternative real estate sectors, for example the Primewest Agricultural Fund;

  • Co-investing in funds alongside fund investors; and

  • Exploring corporate mergers and acquisitions.

6.3 Overview of Primewest since listing on the ASX

Primewest has delivered significant value to Primewest Securityholders since IPO in November 2019:

  • Increased AUM from $3.9 billion to $5.0 billion (+28%)

  • Increased share price from $1.00 to $1.51[2] (+51%)

  • Increased market capitalisation from $349 million to $599 million[2] (+72%)

  • Delivered a total shareholder return of 60.9%, outperforming the S&P/ASX300 A-REIT index by 62.2%[3]

Other key initiatives and milestones since the IPO include:

  • Launched 8 new unlisted funds since IPO

  • Launched Primewest Agricultural Fund in April 2020, with a fund target of $100 million

  • Launched new Daily Needs Trust in June 2020, with an initial $300 million institutional mandate that was later expanded to $930 million in December 2020

  • Acquired a stake in the ASX listed Vitalharvest Freehold Trust (ASX:VTH) and 100% interest in the manager of the trust

  • Launched Primewest Bespoke, a new service offering high level asset management to wholesale investors

  • AUM as at 31 December 2020 adjusted for post balance date revaluation and acquisitions

  • Based on the Implied Offer Price

  • Source: IRESS, as at 16 April 2021. Total shareholder return calculation is to the Implied Offer Price and includes all distributions paid by Primewest since IPO up until the date of this Target’s Statement, inclusive of the declared 2H21 distribution of 2.9 cents per Primewest Security

28 Primewest Group

  1. INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST

6.4 Sector Diversification

Primewest’s portfolio is diversified across multiple real estate sectors:

  • Office ($1.8bn): Office assets located across Perth, Brisbane, Melbourne

  • Daily Needs Retail ($1.1bn): 23 Coles or Woolworths anchored centres across Perth, Adelaide and regional Australia

  • Large Format Retail ($1.0bn): Large footprint and high traffic properties anchored by ASX listed covenants across Australia

  • Industrial ($0.6bn): Industrial sites in well-established locations in Perth, Brisbane, Sydney, Adelaide and Melbourne

  • Other ($0.6bn): Including retail, tourism, land syndicates in the US and Western Australia, and agriculture. Agriculture includes agriculture assets under long term leases to established operators across Australia (includes management of the ASX listed Vitalharvest Freehold Trust)

PRIMEWEST SECTOR DIVERSIFICATION

12% Office 11% 36% Daily Needs Retail Large Format Retail Industrial 20% Other 21%

Target’s Statement

29

6. INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST

6.5 Geographic Diversification

Primewest’s funds are diversified by geography, contributing to a lower correlation to specific market risks. Western Australia constitutes 54% of assets, with the remainder of assets mostly diversified across Australia’s major states. Various includes assets in the US.

PRIMEWEST GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSIFICATION

==> picture [432 x 339] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

QLD
$0.5bn
11%
WA
$2.7bn
54%
SA
$0.3bn
6%
NSW
$0.8bn
16%
VIC
$0.5bn
9%
Various (USA)
$0.1bn TAS
3% $0.04bn
1%
----- End of picture text -----

30 Primewest Group

  1. INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST

6.6 Fund Type

Syndicate funds include 900 active high net worth investors, holding over $1.5bn in equity across 84 syndicates. Mandate refers to institutional mandates.

==> picture [432 x 148] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

8% [6%]
Unlisted single-asset
Unlisted multi-asset 14%
Unlisted multi-asset open ended
Listed
72%
----- End of picture text -----

6.7 AUM Growth

Since June 2015, Primewest has grown AUM by 127%, representing a 15.1% CAGR.

AUM GROWTH SINCE JUNE 2015

==> picture [432 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

+15.1% $4.9bn $5.0bn
$4.5bn
$3.9bn
$3.7bn
$3.2bn
$2.6bn
$2.2bn $2.3bn
Jun-15 Jun-16 Jun-17 Jun-18 Jun-19 At IPO Jun-20 Dec-20 Apr-21
----- End of picture text -----

Target’s Statement

31

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 7

DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION AND INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST’S DIRECTORS

Primewest Group

32

7. DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION AND INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST’S DIRECTORS

7.1 Directors of Primewest

As at the date of this Target’s Statement, the Directors of Primewest are:

  • John Bond, Executive Chairman;

  • Erin Flaherty, Independent Non-Executive Director;

  • Hamish Beck, Independent Non-Executive Director;

  • David Schwartz, Managing Director; and

  • Jim Litis, Executive Director.

The Independent Directors are Erin Flaherty and Hamish Beck. They together comprise the Independent Board Committee (IBC) that was formed to consider the terms of the BID and the waiver of existing escrow restrictions on the executive Directors.

Subsequently, Primewest has agreed to release the existing escrow agreements which applied to the Primewest Securities held by each of the executive Directors so as to permit each executive Director to ACCEPT the Offer.

7.2

Independent Expert’s Report

In order to assist with assessment of the Offer, the Directors engaged the Independent Expert to undertake an independent assessment of the Offer.

A copy of the Independent Expert’s Report is attached in Appendix 1 to this Target’s Statement. The Directors recommend that you read the report in full.

The Independent Expert has concluded that the Offer is fair and reasonable to Primewest Securityholders.

7.3 Directors’ recommendation

The Directors unanimously recommend that Primewest Securityholders ACCEPT the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal.

The reasons for this recommendation are set out in Section 2 of this Target’s Statement.

The decision as to whether or not to ACCEPT the Offer depends on the circumstances for each individual Primewest Securityholder, including risk profile, portfolio strategy, tax position, financial circumstances and investment time horizon.

In considering whether or not to ACCEPT the Offer, your Directors encourage you to:

  • read the whole of this Target’s Statement (including the Independent Expert’s Report) and the Bidder’s Statement;

  • have regard to your individual risk profile, portfolio strategy, tax position and financial circumstances;

  • consider the alternative of selling on the ASX as outlined in Section 4 of this Target’s Statement; and

  • obtain financial advice from your broker or financial adviser about the Offer and obtain taxation advice on the effect of accepting the Offer.

7.4 Directors’ intentions in relation to the Offer

Each Director who owns or controls Primewest Securities intends to ACCEPT the Offer in relation to the Primewest Securities they or their associates own or control, in the absence of a superior proposal.

Details of the relevant interests of each Director in Primewest Securities are set out in Section 7.5 of this Target’s Statement.

Target’s Statement 33

7. DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION AND INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST’S DIRECTORS

7.5 Interest and dealings of directors in Primewest Securities

As at the date immediately before the date of this Target’s Statement, the Directors and their associates had the following number of Primewest Securities:

==> picture [432 x 21] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Director Number of Primewest Securities
----- End of picture text -----

John Bond 70,504,939
Erin Flaherty 30,000
Hamish Beck 273,740
David Schwartz 69,265,697
Jim Litis 71,461,944

No Director has acquired or disposed of a relevant interest in any Primewest Securities in the 4 month period ending on the date immediately before the date of this Target’s Statement.

7.6 Interest and dealings of directors in Centuria Securities

As at the date immediately before the date of this Target’s Statement, no Director had a relevant interest in any Centuria Securities.

No Director has acquired or disposed of a relevant interest in any Centuria Securities in the 4 month period ending on the date immediately before the date of this Target’s Statement.

7.7 Benefits and agreements

Benefits to Directors

As a result of the proposed merger, no Director has been or will be given any benefit (other than a benefit which can be given without member approval under the Corporations Act) in connection with the retirement of that person, or someone else, from the board, managerial office or related body corporate of Primewest.

No Director has agreed to receive, or is entitled to receive, any benefit from Centuria which is related to or conditional on the proposed merger, other than in their capacity as a holder of Primewest Securities.

Agreements in connection with or conditional on the proposed merger

Except as set out below, no agreement has been made between any Director and any other person in connection with, or conditional upon, the outcome of the proposed merger, other than in their capacity as a holder of Primewest Securities.

Interests in contracts with Centuria

No Director has any interest in any contract entered into by Centuria, except as set out below.

7.8 Restraints, escrow and senior executive employment agreements with Centuria and Primewest

Each of the executive Directors, John Bond, Jim Litis and David Schwartz has entered into a Voluntary Escrow Deed in relation to the Centuria Securities they will receive under the Offer, the terms of the Deeds restrict dealing with the Centuria Securities for 12 months from issue (in respect of 50% of the securities), and 24 months from issue (in respect of the remaining 50% of the securities). The Deeds contain customary exceptions to permit acceptance of a genuine takeover bid for or scheme of arrangement in respect of Centuria, and also allow security to be granted over the first 50% of Centuria Securities.

34 Primewest Group

7. DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION AND INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST’S DIRECTORS

Each of the executive Directors has also entered into a Restraint Deed with Primewest in relation to their personal investments and interests in the private funds managed by Primewest. The restrictions in these Deeds last for up to three years and include obligations:

  • not to dispose of those managed fund investments,

  • not to be involved in a business which competes with the Combined Group’s real estate funds management, property sector debt funding, or property development businesses (other than certain passive investments),

  • not to cause the termination of management rights or management contracts in relation to funds managed by the Combined Group, and to vote in favour of the extension of such contracts and other matters recommended by the manager, and

  • not to disparage or harm the management rights or reputation of the Combined Group

Each executive Director has also agreed with Primewest to remain as a senior executive for a period of at least two years, on the same remuneration as currently provided.

These arrangements are considered to be disadvantageous overall to the executive Directors, and are obligations that other Primewest Securityholders are not required to enter into in relation to the Offer.

Target’s Statement 35

7. DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION AND INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST’S DIRECTORS

7.9 Primewest Board of Directors

==> picture [78 x 96] intentionally omitted <==

John Bond Executive Chairman

John is a founding Director of Primewest and has been instrumental in its growth and development. His background spans law, investment banking as well as property investment and development. As a professional property investor, he has over 30 years’ experience in negotiating acquisitions, overseeing the development of properties and asset management.

Along with his fellow Directors, John guides the Primewest team in all aspects of the business. John’s hands on approach affords Primewest a competitive and agile approach to delivering high quality outcomes. Since 1990 John has been instrumental in delivering exceptional property and community outcomes across residential and commercial sectors.

John is a Corporate Member of the Property Council. He is Chairman of two charities, being Australian Doctors for Africa and The Fathering Project. John is also a Board member of the Art Gallery of Western Australia Foundation.

John is a responsible manager under the AFSL.

==> picture [73 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

Erin’s business career has spanned over 30 years on both private and government sectors. She holds a Masters in Law, a Diploma in Applied Corporate Governance and is a member of the Australian Institute of Directors. Erin is a member of the board of Moorebank Intermodal Company and a Guardian of the Commonwealth Future Fund. She is also a Trustee of the Sydney Cricket Ground, and a member of the board of the NSW Police Citizens Youth Clubs.

Erin was appointed a director on 11 October 2019.

Erin Flaherty

Independent Non-Executive Director

==> picture [73 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

Hamish Beck

Independent Non-Executive Director

Hamish is the Managing Director of Beck Advisory and Property Australia Management (PAM), the dedicated asset management division of Beck Advisory. He founded Beck Advisory in 2000 and PAM in 2008, following a successful career in the Australian property industry for some of WA’s largest development and construction companies.

Hamish is also Chairperson of the Swan River Trust, Deputy Chairperson of the Rottnest Island Authority, Member of the Central Perth Planning Committee, and Board Member of the Western Australian Maritime Museum Advisory Committee. In addition, he is an advisor to various institutional groups.

Hamish joined the Board in October 2019.

36 Primewest Group

7. DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION AND INFORMATION RELATING TO PRIMEWEST’S DIRECTORS

==> picture [74 x 89] intentionally omitted <==

David is a founding Director of Primewest and has been instrumental in its growth and development. David is a professional property investor with 25 years’ experience in negotiating acquisitions and overseeing the development of properties. He is a Non-Executive Director of Schaffer Corporation Ltd.

Over the past 40 years David has been involved in many different businesses including retail, manufacturing and distribution. His property investments have been strongly focused on retail and commercial developments.

David is a responsible manager under the AFSL.

David Schwartz Managing Director

==> picture [73 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

Jim Litis Executive Director

Jim is a founding Director of Primewest. Having experienced forty years in the property industry in Australia, Jim is an influential and well respected figure and mentor. His expertise include the acquisition, development and management of retail and large format retail properties, and purchasing and renovating heritage buildings in Perth’s CBD. His vast knowledge of the retail industry has given him a unique insight and outlook when sourcing investment properties and opportunities for investors. Jim’s first foray into retail was opening his own Hi Fi store in the early 70’s.

Jim is involved in a number of philanthropic organisations including Ear Science Institute Australia, The Leukaemia Foundation and The Perron Institute (Neurological and Translational Science). His support includes funding Post Graduate students and research. Jim’s passion for Music, Sport and the Arts have led to his involvement in a number of successful West Australian enterprises including founding one of the first specialist sound system stores in Perth, Douglas HiFi, the Floreat Athena Soccer Club (The Litis Stadium), Venn Gallery, a contemporary art gallery and most recently The Rechabite, an entertainment venue hosting live music, theatre and performance.

Jim is a responsible manager under the AFSL.

7.10 Primewest audited financial statements

The latest published financial statements for Primewest are the audited consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2020 and the reviewed interim consolidated financial statements for the six months ended 31 December 2020.

Copies of Primewest’s published financial statements can be obtained, free of charge, from Primewest’s website, https://primewest.biz/investor-centre/financial-and-annual-reports.

7.11 Primewest continuous disclosure obligations

Primewest is subject to the continuous disclosure obligations contained in the ASX Listing Rules. Under those obligations, subject to limited exceptions, Primewest must disclose material information to ASX immediately on becoming aware of that information.

Copies of all disclosures made by Primewest to ASX can be obtained, free of charge, at ASX’s website (www.asx.com.au) under the ASX code “PWG”.

Target’s Statement 37

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 8 RISK FACTORS

Primewest Group

38

  1. RISK FACTORS

Primewest has summarised below what it believes to be the key risks for you to consider. There are risks which are specific to Primewest and other risks which apply to investments generally, which may materially and adversely affect the future operating and financial performance of Primewest and the value of Primewest Securities. Those risks (and other risks) will continue to be relevant to Primewest Securityholders who do not ACCEPT the Offer and retain their current investment in Primewest. These risks will also continue to be relevant to all Primewest Securityholders if the Offer lapses. While some of these risks can be mitigated, some are outside the control of Primewest and cannot be mitigated.

Centuria’s Bidder’s Statement separately sets out key risks involved in accepting the Offer and receiving Centuria Securities in exchange for your Primewest Securities (other than an Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders). You should consider those key risks carefully before deciding to ACCEPT the Offer.

This summary does not consider risks arising from your individual investment objectives, financial situation or needs.

You should seek your own professional advice about the Offer and the risks associated with receiving Centuria Securities as consideration.

8.1

Risks associated with Primewest and remaining a Primewest Securityholder

Primewest manages over 80 funds on behalf of third-party investors. The majority of Primewest’s income is derived from fees calculated with reference to the value of properties under the control of the Primewest funds management business or from additional services provided to those funds. Primewest’s financial performance may be adversely affected if one or more of the following risks were to occur:

Asset acquisition
risk
The growth in asset management fees is dependent on Primewest acquiring
new assets. There is no guarantee that Primewest will be able to execute
current or future asset acquisitions. To the extent that future asset acquisitions
are not successfully executed, the financial performance of Primewest could
be materially adversely affected. Any failure to identify appropriate assets or
successfully acquire such assets could materially adversely affect the growth
prospects and financial performance of Primewest.
Increase in
competition and
reliance on third
party equity
Primewest’s ability to establish new listed or unlisted funds requires continual
sourcing of equity from existing and new investors. Increased competition for
investor equity, underperformance of funds managed by Primewest, changes in
market conditions and other factors may together, or in isolation, result in limited
availability of investor capital and make it difficult for Primewest to execute its
growth strategy, which would have a material adverse impact on Primewest’s
ability to generate growth.
Funding for
Primewest and the
funds managed by
Primewest
Both Primewest, and the underlying funds managed by Primewest, rely on
access to debt financing to execute the business strategy. An inability to obtain
the necessary funding or refinancing on acceptable terms and at commercial
rates, a material increase in the costs of such funding or a breach of various
covenants including interest coverage ratios and loan to valuation ratios by a
fund could have an adverse impact on Primewest’s debt financing capacity and
also that of the funds managed by Primewest.
Underperformance
of funds managed
by Primewest
There is a risk that one or more of the Funds managed by Primewest
underperform in a material way or for a prolonged period of time in a way that
either results in a reduction of fees paid to Primewest or has a negative effect
on Primewest’s ability to retain existing funds and to attract new assets under
management. Where Primewest has co-invested in the relevant underperforming
fund that could also have an adverse impact on Primewest.

Target’s Statement

39

  1. RISK FACTORS
Risks associated with Primewest and remaining a Primewest Securityholder Risks associated with Primewest and remaining a Primewest Securityholder
Funds move to There is a risk that competitors or existing fund investors initiate actions with
new management the intention to replace Primewest with a different management entity. Large
investors within a particular fund managed by Primewest may, from time to
time, have the ability to terminate the Primewest management arrangement, or
otherwise remove the funds they are invested in from the control of Primewest.
Funds are closed Funds under the control of the Primewest funds management business are fixed
term funds and a number have strategic review dates in the short to medium
term. Investor approval and/or endorsement is required for extensions to the
term of these funds. There is a risk that investors may not approve or endorse
such extensions and whilst selling the assets held by these funds to close the
fund can lead to significant transactional fees for Primewest in the short term,
once the assets are sold, Primewest would no longer receive ongoing fees.
Reputation may Primewest could be adversely impacted by a number of factors which, if they
diminish in value occurred could negatively impact the Primewest brand and consequently the
business and the financial performance of Primewest. Such factors include
failure to provide investors with the quality of service they expect, disputes or
litigation with third parties, employees (including in relation to their employment
arrangements) or suppliers, and adverse media coverage.
Corporate M&A Primewest seeks to acquire complimentary real estate funds management
businesses. There is no guarantee that appropriate businesses will be identified
for acquisition and that transactions of this nature will successfully close.
Ability to attract The loss of senior management, or other key employees, and/or the inability
and retain key staff to hire new employees could adversely impact Primewest’s current and future
business and financial performance.
Compliance Primewest Management Ltd and Primewest Funds Ltd operate under an AFSL.
with laws and Under the Corporations Act, Primewest Management Ltd and Primewest Funds
regulation Ltd must hold an AFSL to engage in certain activities in relation to the funds
management business (and, in respect of Primewest Management Ltd, to
operate Primewest Property Fund). Compliance with the obligations of an AFSL
is the responsibility of the licensee. If the relevant Primewest entities do not meet
regulatory requirements, or authorised representatives breach their obligations
under authorised representative agreements, they may suffer penalties, such as
fines, obligations to pay compensation, enforceable undertakings, impositions of
(or variations to) licence conditions or, ultimately, the cancellation or suspension
of their AFSL. If the Primewest AFSL holders are unable to retain their AFSL
they would be unable to engage in certain activities required to operate the
funds management business. Primewest is also subject to other industry
specific and general legal and other regulatory controls (including anti money
laundering/counter terrorism funding requirements). Any past or future violations
of applicable laws and regulations may result in reputational damage, fines and
penalties, or the loss of licences which could have a material adverse effect on
Primewest’s financial condition, cash flows and operational outcomes. There is
also a risk that future changes to laws and regulations may increase the costs of
operations or adversely affect Primewest’s ability to conduct its business.

40 Primewest Group

8. RISK FACTORS

Risks associated with Primewest and remaining a Primewest Securityholder Risks associated with Primewest and remaining a Primewest Securityholder
Security breach Primewest’s internal database contains confidential and proprietary information,
and data privacy including intellectual property, confidential business information, information
regarding its employees or suppliers, information relating to investors in funds
managed by Primewest, and other confidential information. Primewest’s
business could be materially impacted by security breaches, either by
unauthorised access, theft, destruction, loss of information or misappropriation
or release of confidential investor data, any of which could materially adversely
impact Primewest’s reputation and its financial performance.
Insurance Primewest will carry a range of insurance cover for various assets. However, there
are certain events for which Primewest may not or may not be able to maintain
insurance cover for. These events may include, but are not limited to, acts of war
or political instability and catastrophic events such as floods. In the event of an
uninsured loss or a loss in excess of the relevant insured limit, Primewest could
suffer damage to its reputation and Primewest and the relevant funds it manages
could lose all or a portion of their future revenues.
Property liquidity The property assets in Primewest’s Funds are, by their nature, illiquid
investments. Primewest may not be able to realise the properties within a short
period of time or may not be able to realise the properties at a reasonable
valuation.
COVID-19 COVID-19 was declared a worldwide pandemic by the World Health
Organisation in March 2020. COVID-19, as well as measures to slow the spread
of the virus, have since had a significant impact on global financial markets.
Despite government measures such as economic stimulus packages, there is
still considerable economic uncertainty. The real estate sector specifically has
been impacted by concerns surrounding security of income and uncertainty
around property valuations. In addition, this uncertainty and associated market
volatility has resulted in a significant slowdown of transactional activity and
investment in most real estate markets. As a result of COVID-19, there is
significant valuation uncertainty due to an inactive property investment market, a
lack of relevant transactional evidence as well as uncertainties in relation to the
potential impact of the pandemic on the future cash flows of Primewest.
Climate Risk The long-term implications of climate change may impact Primewest on several
fronts and in the future, climate change may be a long term driver of both
financial and non-financial risks.

Target’s Statement 41

  1. RISK FACTORS

==> picture [433 x 644] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Investment risks associated with Primewest and remaining a Primewest Securityholder
Any investment is accompanied by a host of market or sector risks, general to its universe.
Economic factors Primewest is exposed to changes in general economic conditions in Australia
and globally. Adverse changes in inflation rates, interest rates, employment
rates, government policies (including fiscal, monetary and regulatory policies),
other structural changes and other factors driving global macroeconomic
conditions are outside the control of Primewest and are not reliably predictable.
Any of these factors may have an adverse impact on Primewest’s business and
financial performance.
Price of Primewest The price of Primewest Securities quoted on ASX may rise or fall due to a
Securities number of factors, including fluctuations and general volatility in the domestic
and international market for listed stocks, general economic conditions, including
interest rates, inflation rates, exchange rates, commodity and oil prices, changes
to government fiscal, monetary or regulatory policies, legislation or regulation,
inclusion in or removal from market indices, the nature of the markets in which
Primewest operates and general operational and business risks. Other factors
which may negatively affect investor sentiment and influence Primewest
specifically or the stock market more generally include acts of terrorism, an
outbreak of international hostilities or fires, floods, droughts, earthquakes, labour
strikes, civil wars, natural disasters, outbreaks of disease or other natural or
man-made events or occurrences. Further, the share and unit prices for many
listed entities have in recent times, been subject to wide fluctuations, which
in many cases may reflect a diverse range of non-entity specific influences.
Such market fluctuations may materially adversely affect the market price of
the Primewest Securities. No assurances can be given that the performance
of the Primewest Securities will not be adversely affected by any such market
fluctuations or factors. Primewest does not guarantee the performance of the
Primewest Securities.
Significant The founders of Primewest (David Schwartz, John Bond and Jim Litis) hold
retained holding in aggregate approximately 53% of Primewest. As such, they may have the
by the founders of capacity to influence the election of Directors, the approval of significant
Primewest corporate transactions and the success of a takeover or similar offer for
Primewest Securities.
Liquidity There can be no guarantee that there will be an active market in Primewest
Securities or that their value will increase. There may be relatively few or many
buyers or sellers of the Primewest Securities on the ASX at any one time which
may lead to increased price volatility and affect the price at which Primewest
Securityholders are able to sell their Primewest Securities.
Future No assurances can be provided in relation to the payment of future distributions.
distributions Future determination as to the payment of distributions by Primewest will be
at the discretion of Primewest and will depend upon the availability or profits,
the operating results and financial condition of Primewest, future capital
requirements, covenants in relevant debt facilities, general business and
financial conditions and other factors considered relevant by Primewest.
Dilution In the future, Primewest may elect to issue new Primewest Securities or engage
in capital raisings to fund investments that Primewest may decide to undertake.
While Primewest will be subject to the constraints of ASX Listing Rules regarding
the percentage of its capital that it is able to issue within a 12-month period
(other than where exceptions apply), Primewest Securityholders at the time may
be diluted as a result of such issues of Primewest Securities and capital raisings.
----- End of picture text -----

42 Primewest Group

  1. RISK FACTORS

8.2

==> picture [433 x 514] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Investment risks associated with Primewest and remaining a Primewest Securityholder
Accounting Changes to Australian Accounting Standards issued by the AASB or changes
standards to the commonly held views on the application and interpretation of those
standards could materially adversely affect the value of Primewest Securities.
Taxation changes Future changes in Australian taxation law (including goods and services tax and
stamp duty), including changes in interpretation or application of the law by the
courts or taxation authorities in Australia, may affect the taxation treatment of
your investment in Primewest Securities or the holding and disposal of those
Primewest Securities. Further, changes in tax law (including goods or services
tax and stamp duty) or changes in the way tax law is expected to be interpreted
in the jurisdictions in which Primewest operates, may impact the future tax
liabilities of Primewest.
Risks associated with the Offer and the Combined Group
There are risks inherent to merging two entities and becoming a Centuria Securityholder of the
Combined Group.
The market price The market price of Centuria Securities on ASX varies from time to time. The
of the Centuria market price at the time at which you receive Centuria Securities under the Offer
Securities will vary may vary from the market price on the date that you ACCEPT the Offer or the
from time to time market price used for the calculation of the Offer Price.
The market price of Centuria Securities may fall at any time, including before or
after Centuria Securities are issued to you. Accordingly, you may be unable to
sell your Centuria Securities at a price equivalent to the market price when you
accepted the Offer, the market price used for the calculation of the Offer Price or
the market price when you receive your Centuria Securities.
There are business Any business acquisition and integration (such as will be required by the
acquisition and Combined Group) carries with it uncertainty and risk, including as to whether
integration risks the benefits of the acquisition will meet expectations and whether integration of
processes and systems can be achieved.
There may be The tax consequences for you of accepting the Offer and receiving Centuria
adverse tax Securities as consideration will depend on your specific circumstances.
consequences for
If you have any questions regarding the tax consequences of accepting the Offer
you of accepting
and receiving Centuria Securities as consideration, you should obtain your own
the Offer and
taxation advice.
receiving Centuria
Securities as
consideration
----- End of picture text -----

Target’s Statement 43

  1. RISK FACTORS
Risks associated with the Offer and the Combined Group
An exposure to
Centuria has a substantial existing business in Australia as a specialist
risks associated
investment and property funds manager. Centuria’s key businesses are the
with Centuria’s
management of listed and unlisted property funds in Australia and the issue of
existing
investment bonds. Accordingly, if you receive Centuria Securities, you will be
businesses and
exposed to risks associated with Centuria’s businesses, including the operation
the industries
of those businesses in Australia.
in which those
businesses
operate
Some risks specific to Centuria include: the potential for reduction in fund
management fees due to adverse factors affecting funds managed by Centuria
subsidiaries (including due to fund underperformance, action taken by fund
holders to remove Centuria subsidiaries as manager, the expiry of fixed term
funds or the reduction in property values), the risk that Centuria may not be able
to launch new managed funds in the future, the potential for external funding to
be unavailable to finance property purchases, the risk that Centuria may not be
able to properly integrate Primewest or other businesses acquired by Centuria,
the potential for severe disruption to Centuria’s information systems and the risk
that senior managers may leave Centuria.
Centuria has disclosed information to the ASX regarding its assessment of
applicable general risks and risk factors specific to the industries within which
Centuria operates, as well as risks that are specific to Centuria.
Integration of
There is a risk that implementation and other one-off costs of integration may be
Primewest
substantial or greater than reasonable anticipated. This could have a material
adverse impact on the Combined Group’s financial position and performance.
Risks specific to
Exposure to Centuria Industrial REIT (ASX: CIP) and Centuria Office REIT
REITs
(ASX: COF) exposes Primewest Securityholders to the risks specific to REITs,
including:

Counterparty/credit risk– REITs are exposed to the risk that third parties,
such as tenants, developers, service providers and financial counterparties to
derivatives (including interest rate hedging instruments) and other contracts
may not be willing or able to perform their obligations;

Fixed nature of costs– Many costs associated with the ownership and
management of property assets are fixed in nature. The value of properties
(and the value attributed to the Combined Group) may be adversely affected if
the income from the asset declines and these fixed costs remain unchanged;

Land values– Events may occur from time to time that affect the value
of land which may then impact the financial returns generated from
particular property related investment businesses or projects. For example,
unanticipated environmental issues may adversely affect the future earnings
of Centuria; and

Trust taxation status– Changes in taxation law (including goods and
services taxes and stamp duties), or changes in the way tax laws are
interpreted in the various jurisdictions in which Centuria operates, may
affect the tax liabilities of Centuria, as well as the tax liabilities of Primewest
Securityholders who become holders of Centuria Securities, due to the flow-
through tax treatment associated with trusts.
Accounting
Changes to Australian Accounting Standards issued by the AASB or changes
standards
to the commonly held views on the application and interpretation of those
standards could materially adversely affect the value of Centuria Securities.

44 Primewest Group

  1. RISK FACTORS
Risks associated with the Offer and the Combined Group Risks associated with the Offer and the Combined Group
Taxation changes Future changes in Australian taxation law (including goods and services tax
and stamp duty), including changes in interpretation or application of the law by
the courts or taxation authorities in Australia, may affect the taxation treatment
of your investment in Centuria Securities or the holding and disposal of those
Centuria Securities. Further, changes in tax law (including goods or services tax
and stamp duty) or changes in the way tax law is expected to be interpreted in
the jurisdictions in which Centuria operates, may impact the future tax liabilities
of Centuria.
Interest rate risk Adverse fluctuations in interest rates, to the extent that they are not hedged, may
impact Centuria’s funding costs adversely, resulting in a decrease in distributable
income. Where interest rates are hedged by way of financial instruments, the
value of those instruments can vary substantially which can impact on both
earnings and net assets.
Foreign exchange/ All information in this Target’s Statement is presented in Australian dollars.
currency risk Centuria Security holders who reside outside Australia, or who rely on funding
denominated in a currency other than the Australian dollar, should be aware of
the impact that fluctuations in exchange rates may have on the value of their
investments in, and returns from, Centuria.

Target’s Statement 45

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 9 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Primewest Group

46

  1. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

9.1 Bid Implementation Deed

Under the Bid Implementation Deed entered into with Centuria, Primewest has agreed:

  • ( No shop ) not to solicit, invite, encourage or initiate any inquiry, expression of interest, offer, proposal or discussion with a view of obtaining a competing proposal.

  • ( No talk and no due diligence ) not to participate in negotiations or discussions, enter any agreement, arrangement or understanding, or provide non-public information about Primewest to any third party in response to any inquiry, expression of interest, offer, proposal or discussion in relation to an actual, proposed or potential competing proposal.

  • ( Notification ) to notify Centuria as soon as possible if it becomes aware of any approach, proposal, or attempt to initiate negotiations or discussions regarding an actual, proposed or potential competing proposal.

  • ( Matching right ) to give Centuria 5 business days to match a proposed competing proposal, which the Directors consider to be an actual or potential superior proposal, before Primewest is able to enter into an agreement to implement such competing proposal or the Directors are able to recommend such competing proposal.

The no talk and no due diligence restriction does not apply to the extent that it restricts Primewest from taking or refusing to take any action with respect to an actual or potential superior proposal (which was not solicited, invited, encouraged or initiated by Primewest) where the Directors have determined that it would or would be likely to be a breach of their fiduciary or statutory duties to do so.

For further information regarding the exclusivity arrangements see Section 10 of the Bid Implementation Deed, which was released to ASX on 19 April 2021.

Primewest has further agreed to pay a break fee of $2 million to Centuria in certain circumstances, including one or more of the Directors failing to recommend that Primewest Securityholders ACCEPT the Offer (in the absence of a superior proposal), withdrawing or adversely revising such recommendation, or recommending acceptance of a competing proposal, or if a competing proposal for control of Primewest is made and is ultimately successful. For further information regarding the break fee see Section 11 of the Bid Implementation Deed.

9.2

Minimum acceptance condition

In the Bid Implementation Deed Centuria has agreed that the 90% minimum acceptance condition in the Offer will not be waived or reduced below 80% without the consent of the Primewest Directors (after having consulted in good faith with Centuria). Primewest Securityholders should be aware that the Primewest Directors may consent to such a waiver or variation in appropriate circumstances, and will take into consideration matters including but not limited to:

  • the impact on Primewest Securityholders as a whole of the Offer not proceeding;

  • whether or not rollover relief is potentially available to Primewest Securityholders as a result of giving (or not giving) consent; and

  • the commercial implications of Centuria not being entitled to compulsorily acquire Primewest.

9.3 Issued capital

As at 2 February 2021, the following Primewest Securities on issue are:

Class Number Primewest Securities 396,547,747 fully paid ordinary securities Primewest Options[1] 1,213,423

  1. Primewest will enter into agreements with each Primewest Option holder that, from the date the Offer becomes or is declared unconditional, the Primewest Options will be cancelled and each Primewest Option holders will receive cash consideration for the cancellation of their Options

Target’s Statement 47

  1. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

9.4 Substantial holders

As at 29 January 2021, following Primewest’s recent equity raising, the substantial Primewest Securityholders are set out below:

Substantial Primewest Securityholder Number of Primewest
Securities
Interest of Primewest
Securityholder and
its associates
Jim Litis 71,461,944 18.0%
John Bond 70,504,939 17.8%
David Schwartz 69,265,697 17.5%

9.5 Material Litigation

Primewest is not involved in any litigation or disputes which are material in the context of Primewest taken as a whole.

9.6 Consents

Deloitte has given, and not withdrawn before the lodgement of this Target’s Statement with ASIC, its written consent to be named in this Target’s Statement as the Independent Expert in the form and context it is so named and to the inclusion of its Independent Expert’s Report as Attachment 1 to this Target’s Statement. Deloitte has not caused or authorised the issue of this Target’s Statement, does not make or purport to make any statement in this Target’s Statement (other than the Independent Expert’s Report) or any statement on which a statement in this Target’s Statement is based (other than extracts from the Independent Expert’s Report) and takes no responsibility for any part of this Target’s Statement other than any reference to its name and its Independent Expert’s Report.

Moelis Australia (Moelis) has given, and not withdrawn before the lodgement of this Target’s Statement with ASIC, its written consent to be named in this Target’s Statement as Primewest’s financial adviser in the form and context it is so named. Moelis has not caused or authorised the issue of this Target’s Statement, does not make or purport to make any statement in this Target’s Statement or any statement on which a statement in this Target’s Statement is based and takes no responsibility for any part of this Target’s Statement other than any reference to its name.

Hamilton Locke has given, and not withdrawn before the lodgement of this Target’s Statement with ASIC, its written consent to be named in this Target’s Statement as Primewest’s Australian legal adviser (other than in relation to taxation) in the form and context it is so named. Hamilton Locke has not advised on the laws of any foreign jurisdiction. Hamilton Locke has not caused or authorised the issue of this Target’s Statement, does not make or purport to make any statement in this Target’s Statement or any statement on which a statement in this Target’s Statement is based and takes no responsibility for any part of this Target’s Statement other than any reference to its name.

PwC has given, and not withdrawn before the lodgement of this Target’s Statement with ASIC, its written consent to be named in this Target’s Statement as Primewest’s tax adviser in the form and context it is so named. PwC has not caused or authorised the issue of this Target’s Statement, does not make or purport to make any statement in this Target’s Statement or any statement on which a statement in this Target’s Statement is based and takes no responsibility for any part of this Target’s Statement other than any reference to its name.

As permitted by ASIC Class Order 13/521, this Target’s Statement contains statements which are made, or based on statements made, in documents lodged by Centuria with ASIC or given to the ASX or, announced on the company announcements platform of the ASX, by Centuria. Pursuant to the Class Order, the consent of Centuria is not required for the inclusion of such statements in this Target’s Statement. Any Primewest Securityholder who would like to receive a copy of any of those documents may obtain a copy (free of charge) during the Offer Period by contacting the Primewest Securityholder Information Line on 1300 943 885 (within Australia) or +61 2 8072 1488 (outside Australia) between 9.00am and 5.00pm (Sydney time), Monday to Friday (excluding national public holidays). Any telephone calls to these numbers will, as required by the Corporations Act, be tape recorded, indexed and stored.

48 Primewest Group

  1. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

As permitted by ASIC Corporations (Consents to Statements) Instrument 2016/72 (Corporations Instrument 2016/72), this Target’s Statement may include or be accompanied by certain statements:

  • which fairly represent what purports to be a statement by an official person;

  • which are a correct and fair copy of, or extract from, what purports to be a public official document; or

  • which are a correct and fair copy of, or extract from, a statement which has already been published in a book, journal or comparable publication.

In addition, as permitted by Corporations Instrument 2016/72, this Target’s Statement contains security price trading data sourced from IRESS and FactSet without its consent.

9.7 No other material information

This Target’s Statement is required to include all the information that Primewest Securityholders and their professional advisers would reasonably require to make an informed assessment whether to ACCEPT the Offer, but:

  • only to the extent to which it is reasonable for investors and their professional advisers to expect to find this information in this Target’s Statement; and

  • only if the information is known to any Director.

The Directors are of the opinion that the information that Primewest Securityholders and their professional advisers would reasonably require to make an informed assessment whether to ACCEPT the Offer is:

  • the information contained in the Bidder’s Statement (to the extent that the information is not inconsistent or superseded by information in this Target’s Statement);

  • the information contained in Primewest’s releases to the ASX, and in the documents lodged by Primewest with ASIC before the date of this Target’s Statement; and

  • the information contained in this Target’s Statement (including the information contained in the Independent Expert’s Report).

The Directors have assumed, for the purposes of preparing this Target’s Statement, that the information in the Bidder’s Statement is accurate (unless they have expressly indicated otherwise in this Target’s Statement). However, the Directors do not take any responsibility for the contents of the Bidder’s Statement and are not to be taken as endorsing, in any way, any or all statements contained in it.

In deciding what information should be included in this Target’s Statement, the Directors have had regard to:

  • the nature of the Primewest Securities;

  • the matters that Primewest Securityholders may reasonably be expected to know;

  • the fact that certain matters may reasonably be expected to be known to Primewest Securityholders’ professional advisers; and

  • the time available to Primewest to prepare this Target’s Statement.

9.8

Regulatory Matters

Primewest has sought a waiver from ASX of ASX Listing Rule 6.23.3 to allow Primewest Option holders to be paid cash consideration for the cancellation of their Primewest Options as part of the proposed merger. This is a standard form waiver under ASX Guidance Note 17 and is expected to be granted under the powers granted to ASX to do so under ASX Listing Rule 18.1.

Target’s Statement 49

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 10 TAXATION CONSEQUENCES

Primewest Group

50

10. TAXATION CONSEQUENCES

10.1 Introduction

This section is a brief guide only in respect of certain Australian tax considerations of transferring Primewest Securities to Centuria under the Offer based on the law and the administrative practices of Australian revenue authorities as at the date of this Target’s Statement. It is not advice to any particular Primewest Securityholder and does not set out all tax considerations that may be applicable. Primewest Securityholders should seek their own tax advice that takes into account their personal circumstances.

This Section is not applicable for Securityholders who do not hold their Primewest Securities as capital assets (for example Securityholders who hold their Primewest Securities as trading stock, revenue assets for the purposes of resale or profit or are subject to the operation of Division 230 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997).

Primewest has applied for a class ruling on behalf of Primewest Securityholders confirming the Australian income tax outcomes for Primewest Securityholders in relation to the disposal of their Primewest Securities. Primewest expects this draft class ruling to be finalised shortly after the issue of this Target’s Statement and to be finalised following completion of the proposed merger. A link to the finalised class ruling will be made available on Primewest’s website following publication by the ATO.

The comments below reflect the anticipated outcomes of the proposed merger and the class ruling.

10.2 Disposal of Primewest Securities and issuance of Centuria Securities

A Primewest Securityholder who transfers their Primewest Securities to Centuria under the Offer will dispose of two separate assets for Australian capital gains tax (CGT) purposes. That is, the shares in Primewest Group Limited and units in Primewest Property Fund. Each of these disposals will constitute a CGT event.

For Primewest Securityholders who ACCEPT the Offer, the date of this CGT event will be the date that the Primewest Securityholder accepts the Offer. If a Primewest Securityholder does not ACCEPT the Offer but a compulsory acquisition occurs, the CGT event should take place on the date the ownership of the Primewest Securities changes to Centuria.

A Primewest Securityholder will derive a capital gain on the disposal of the shares and/or units to the extent that the capital proceeds received on disposal of the relevant asset exceeds the CGT cost base of the shares or units respectively. A Primewest Securityholder will incur a capital loss on the disposal of a share and/or unit to the extent that the capital proceeds on disposal are less than the CGT reduced cost base of the shares or units held.

The capital proceeds for each Primewest Group Limited share will be 13.33 cents and 0.473 Centruia Capital Limited shares.

The capital process for each Primewest Property Fund unit will be 6.67 cents and 0.473 Centuria Capital Fund units.

10.3 Scrip for scrip rollover relief

Rollover relief will only be available to the extent that Centuria acquires at least 80% of Primewest in connection with the Offer. The following discussion proceeds on the basis that this will occur.

A portion of any capital gain arising for Primewest Securityholders in respect of either or both of the CGT Events as a result of the proposed merger, may be disregarded if scrip for scrip rollover relief is available and chosen in respect of their shares and units. Rollover relief is not available in respect of a capital loss.

Where a Primewest Securityholder realises a capital gain in respect of one of the CGT Events but realises a capital loss in respect of the other CGT Event, the Primewest Securityholder could offset the capital loss against the capital gain instead of choosing scrip for scrip rollover in respect of the capital gain. We recommend that Primewest Securityholders seek independent financial advice before making any decision about choosing scrip for scrip rollover relief.

If scrip for scrip rollover is chosen by the Primewest Securityholders, the cost base and reduced cost base of each share or unit in Centuria Capital Limited and Centuria Capital Fund Limited (as applicable) will be equal to the amount which is reasonably attributable to the cost base of each Primewest Group Limited share and Primewest Property Fund unit (as applicable) for which it was exchanged and for which scrip for scrip rollover relief is obtained (refer further comments below in respect of cost base and reduce cost base implication of the cash component of the Offer).

Target’s Statement 51

10. TAXATION CONSEQUENCES

For CGT discount purposes, if rollover relief is chosen then the Centuria Capital Limited shares and/or Centuria Capital Fund units (as applicable) will be taken to have been acquired at the time the original Primewest Group Limited shares and Primewest Property Fund unit (as applicable) for which they were exchanged were originally acquired.

10.4

Ineligible proceeds

Roll-over relief does not apply to the cash component of the consideration under the Offer. This consideration is referred to as ‘ineligible proceeds’. Where a capital gain in respect of a share or unit is eligible for rollover relief and that relief is chosen to apply, the Primewest Securityholder must apportion the cost base of its share or unit based on the eligible and ineligible proceeds on a reasonable basis. The generally accepted basis is to use the following formula:

Ineligible Proceeds/Total Proceeds x Total Cost base of Share/Unit disposed of.

This portion of cost base and reduced cost base is then compared with the cash consideration applicable to each of the Primewest Group Limited share and Primewest Property Fund unit to determine the capital gain or loss referable to those disposals.

10.5

CGT Discount

An Australian resident Primewest Securityholder who is an individual, a trust or a complying superannuation fund may be entitled to reduce their capital gain (after first reducing the capital gain by any available capital losses) by the CGT discount, provided that the Primewest Securities were acquired (for CGT purposes) at least 12 months before their disposal to Centuria (excluding the date of acquisition and the date of disposal) and the Primewest Securityholder did not choose to index the cost base of their Primewest Securities (where applicable).

The applicable CGT discount is generally as follows:

  • 50% for individuals and trustees (except a trust that is a complying superannuation entity); and

  • 33 1∕3% for a complying superannuation entity.

The CGT discount is not available to any Primewest Securityholder that is a company.

10.6 Where roll-over is not available or not chosen

Where roll-over is not available or not chosen by a Primewest Securityholder, the CGT provisions provide that first element of cost base for the acquisition of the Centuria Securities is equal to the sum of any money paid plus the market value of any other property provided, in respect of the acquisition, worked out at the time of the acquisition. The first element of reduced cost base is similarly determined.

The date of acquisition of the shares and units in Centuria (as applicable) will be the date on which the shares and units in Centuria (as applicable) are issued to Primewest Securityholders.

As such, the cost base and reduced cost base of shares and units issued by Centuria (as applicable) to the Primewest Securityholders under the Offer will be equal to the value of the Centuria Securities at the date of issuance.

10.7 Non-resident Primewest Securityholders

Any Primewest Securityholder that is not a resident for Australian income tax purposes should generally not have to pay Australian income tax on any capital gain arising on the disposal of their Primewest Securities, unless both of the following requirements are satisfied:

  • the Primewest Securityholder, together with its associates, held a combined interest of at least 10% in Primewest either at the time the Primewest Securities were disposed of (for CGT purposes) or for at least 12 months during the 24 months before the Primewest Securities were disposed of (for CGT purposes); and

  • 50% or more of the market value of the assets of Primewest is represented by real property in Australia (Principal Asset Test).

Non-resident Primewest Securityholders may be liable to Australian income tax and be required to lodge an Australian income tax return in connection with the disposal of Primewest Securities even if Centuria does not withhold any tax as described below.

52 Primewest Group

10. TAXATION CONSEQUENCES

10.8 Withholding Tax

Centuria may be required by Subdivision 14-D of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) to pay amounts to the ATO in respect of the acquisition of Primewest Securities from certain Primewest Securityholders, namely ‘relevant foreign residents.’ In this case, Centuria is permitted to deduct the relevant amounts from the payment of the consideration to those Primewest Securityholder and remit such amounts to the ATO.

No withholding will be made if the Primewest Securityholder in question provides a declaration in writing that the Primewest Securities to be disposed of or a component of them is not indirect taxable Australian property. If the Declaration only applies to a component of the Primewest Securities, then no withholding will only apply to that component.

10.9 Stamp duty

A Primewest Securityholder who disposes of its Primewest Securities to Centuria should not be liable for stamp duty on the transfer.

10.10 GST

A Primewest Securityholder who disposes of its Primewest Securities to Centuria should not be subject to the goods and services tax on the transfer. However, it may be denied credits in respect of any GST it incurs in relation to costs associated with the transfer (such as any adviser fees).

10.11 Consequences of holding Centuria Securities

The Bidder’s Statement sets out a summary of the Australian income tax implications for Primewest Securityholder in respect of their ownership of Centuria Securities.

Target’s Statement 53

==> picture [595 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 11 GLOSSARY AND INTERPRETATION

Primewest Group

54

11. GLOSSARY AND INTERPRETATION

11.1

==> picture [433 x 637] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Term Meaning
2H21 Second half of the 2021 financial year, six month period ending on
30 June 2021
$, A$ or AUD Australian Dollar
Acceptance Form The acceptance form included with the Bidder’s Statement dated
14 May 2021
AFSL Australian Financial Services Licence
Announcement Date 17 April 2021
ASIC Australian Securities and Investments Commission
ASX ASX Limited or the financial market operated by it as the context requires
ASX Listing Rules The official listing rules of ASX, as amended or replaced from time to time
AUM Assets under management
Bid Implementation Bid implementation deed dated 18 April 2021
Deed or BID
Bidder’s Statement The Bidder’s Statement issued by Centuria dated 14 May 2021
Business Day A day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, bank holiday or public holiday in
Sydney, Australia
CAGR Compounded annual growth rate
Centuria or Centuria (a) when used in connection with the Offer, Centuria Capital Limited (acting
Capital Group in its own capacity and as nominee for the Centuria Capital Fund);
(b) otherwise, the ASX listed entity consisting of Centuria Capital Limited
and Centuria Funds Management Limited as responsible entity for the
Centuria Capital Fund and their subsidiaries as the context requires
Centuria Capital Limited Centuria Capital Limited (ACN 095 454 336)
Centuria Capital Fund Centuria Capital Fund (ARSN 613 856 358), of which Centuria Funds
Management Limited (ACN 607 153 588) is the responsible entity
Centuria Funds Centuria Funds Management Limited (ACN 607 153 588)
Management
Centuria Investment Centuria’s investment bonds through Centuria Life, comprising $0.9bn
Bonds of AUM. Centuria Life’s investment bond funds invest in the major asset
classes of cash, fixed interest, Australian shares, international shares,
property and infrastructure along with a range of diversified, balanced and
growth strategies
Centuria Property Centuria’s property funds, being extensive range of property fund types
Funds ranging from listed funds to unlisted fixed-term and open-ended funds
----- End of picture text -----

Target’s Statement 55

11. GLOSSARY AND INTERPRETATION

==> picture [433 x 641] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Term Meaning
Centuria Securities In each case, one fully paid ordinary share in Centuria Capital Limited
stapled to one fully paid ordinary unit in Centuria Capital Fund (ARSN 613
856 358)
Combined Group The combined businesses of Centuria and Primewest, assuming Centuria
acquires 100% of Primewest
Corporations Act Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
cps Cents per share
Deloitte Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited, ABN 19 003 833 127,
AFSL 241457 of Level 1 Grosvernor Place, 225 George Street, Sydney
NSW 2000
Directors Directors of Primewest
EBIT Earnings before interest and tax
EPS Earnings per share
FY21 Full 2021 financial year, ending 30 June 2021
Government Agency Means any foreign or Australian government or governmental, semi-
governmental, administrative, fiscal or judicial body, department,
commission, authority, tribunal, agency or entity, or any minister of the
Crown in right of the Commonwealth of Australian or any State, and any
other federal, state, provincial, or local government, whether foreign or
Australian
IBC Independent board committee established by Primewest
Implied Offer Price The mixed consideration payable based on Centuria’s last close of $2.77
per Centuria Security on 16 April 2021
Independent Expert Deloitte
Independent Experts The report prepared by the Independent Expert dated 14 May 2021 set out
Report in Appendix 1 to the Target’s Statement
Ineligible Foreign a Primewest Securityholder whose address as shown on the register of
Securityholder members of Primewest is in a jurisdiction other than Australia or its external
territories and New Zealand, unless Centuria otherwise determines
after being satisfied that it is not unlawful, not unduly onerous and not
unduly impracticable to make the Offer to a Primewest Securityholder in
the relevant jurisdiction and for Centuria Securities to be issued to such
Primewest Securityholder on acceptance of the Offer, and that is not
unlawful for such a Primewest Securityholder to ACCEPT the Offer in such
circumstances in the relevant jurisdiction
Implementation Period Has the meaning given in the Bid Implementation Deed
IPO Initial public offer
----- End of picture text -----

56 Primewest Group

11. GLOSSARY AND INTERPRETATION

==> picture [433 x 585] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Term Meaning
Last Trading Date 16 April 2021
Marketable Parcel has the meaning given in the ASX Operating Rules Procedures which,
among other things, includes a parcel of Primewest Securities, the value of
which is not less than $500
Nominee Morgan Stanley Australia Securities Limited ABN 55 078 652 276 (AFSL
233741), which Centuria has sought ASIC approval for its appointment
as nominee for the purposes of section 619(3) of the Corporations
Act, with regard to the proposed sale of Centuria Securities that would
have otherwise been issued to Ineligible Foreign Securityholders and
Unmarketable Parcel Securityholders
Offer The offer by Centuria for all Primewest Securities according on the terms
contained in the Bidder’s Statement
Offer Period The period during which the Offer will remain open for acceptance in
accordance with Section 3 of Appendix 1 of the Bidder’s Statement
Offer Price The mixed consideration of $0.20 cash per Primewest Security and 0.473
Centuria Securities per Primewest Security
Primewest Primewest, a stapled group comprising Primewest Group Limited and
Primewest Property Fund and their subsidiaries as the context requires
Primewest Funds Ltd Primewest Fund Ltd (ACN 134 321 216)
Primewest Group Primewest Group Limited (ACN 636 344 137)
Limited
Primewest Management Primewest Management Ltd (ABN 63 091 415 833)
Ltd
Primewest Option Unquoted options issued pursuant to the Primewest Employee Securities
Option Plan
Primewest Property Primewest Property Fund (ARSN 636 405 635), Primewest Management
Fund Ltd (ABN 63 091 415 833) acting as responsible entity
Primewest A person who is registered as a holder of Primewest Securities
Securityholders
Primewest Securities In each case, one fully paid ordinary share in PWG stapled to one fully paid
ordinary unit in Primewest Property Fund (ARSN 636 405 635)
PwC PricewaterhouseCoopers (ABN 52 780 433 757)
REIT Real estate investment trust
----- End of picture text -----

Target’s Statement 57

11. GLOSSARY AND INTERPRETATION

==> picture [433 x 399] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Term Meaning
Restraint Deed The restraint deed into which each of John Bond, David Schwartz and
Jim Litis have entered, applying for a period of 3 years from the date the
Centuria Offer is declared or becomes unconditional
Please see Section 13.2 of the Bidder’s Statement for further information
Target’s Statement This document which is issued by Primewest under Part 6.5, Division 3 of
the Corporations Act in response to the Offer made on 19 April 2021 by
Centuria
TSR Total shareholder return
Undisturbed Date 16 April 2021
Unmarketable Parcel a Primewest Securityholder to whom, if they ACCEPT the Offer, Centuria
Securityholder Securities would be issued which would not constitute a Marketable Parcel
Vitalharvest Transaction The scheme of arrangement to be implemented between the Trust
Company (RE Services) Limited (ACN 003 278 831) as responsible
entity of Vitalharvest Freehold Trust (ARSN 626 537 362) and Macquarie
Agricultural Funds Management Limited (ACN 122 169 368) as trustee of
Macquarie Agriculture Fund – Crop Australia 2
Voluntary Escrow Deed The condition of the Centuria Offer by each of the executive directors of
Primewest, being John Bond, David Schwartz and Jim Litis must enter into
a form of non-regulatory escrow deed in customary form determined by
Centuria and Primewest
Please see Appendix 2 of the Bidder’s Statement for further information
VWAP Volume weight average price
WALE Weighted average lease expiry
----- End of picture text -----

11.2 Interpretation

In this Target’s Statement:

  • Other words and phrases have the same meaning (if any) given to them in the Corporations Act.

  • • Words of any gender include all genders.

  • Words importing the singular include the plural and vice versa.

  • An expression importing a person includes any company, partnership, joint venture, association, corporation or other body corporate and vice versa.

  • A reference to a section, clause, attachment and schedule is a reference to a section of, clause of and an attachment and schedule to this Target’s Statement as relevant.

  • A reference to any legislation includes all delegated legislation made under it and amendments, consolidations, replacements or re enactments of any of them.

  • Headings and bold type are for convenience only and do not affect the interpretation of this Target’s Statement.

  • A reference to time is a reference to AEST.

  • A reference to dollars, $, A$, AUD, cents, ¢ and currency is a reference to the lawful currency of the Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Specifying anything in this document after the words ‘includes’ or ‘for example’ or similar expressions does not limit what else is included.

58 Primewest Group

==> picture [596 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

SECTION 12 AUTHORISATION

Target’s Statement

59

12. AUTHORISATION

This Target’s Statement has been approved by resolutions passed by the directors of Primewest. All Primewest directors voted in favour of that the resolution.

Date: 14 May 2021

Signed for and on behalf of Primewest Management Limited and Primewest Group Limited:

==> picture [80 x 32] intentionally omitted <==

John Bond Executive Chairman Primewest Group Limited

==> picture [108 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

David Schwartz Managing Director Primewest Group Limited

60 Primewest Group

==> picture [596 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX 1

INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Target’s Statement 61

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Primewest Group Limited

Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

13 May 2021

62 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Financial Services Guide (FSG)

What is an FSG?

An FSG is designed to provide information about the supply of financial services to you.

Why are we providing this FSG to you?

Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited (AFSL 241457) has been engaged by Primewest Group Limited (PWG) to prepare an independent expert’s report (our Report) in connection with Centuria Capital Limited’s takeover offer of PWG. PWG will provide our Report to you.

Our Report provides you with general financial product advice. This FSG informs you about the use of general financial product advice, the financial services we offer, our dispute resolution process and our remuneration. Our contact details are in the document that accompanies this FSG.

What financial services are we licensed to provide?

We are authorised to provide financial product advice and to arrange for another person to deal in financial products in relation to securities, interests in managed investment schemes, government debentures, stocks or bonds, to retail and wholesale clients. We are also authorised to provide personal and general financial product advice and deal by arranging in derivatives and regulated emissions units to wholesale clients, and general financial product advice relating to derivatives to retail clients.

Report. This fee is not contingent on the outcome of the Proposed Transaction.

Apart from these fees, Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited, our directors and officers, and any related bodies corporate, affiliates or associates, and their directors and officers, do not receive any commissions or other benefits.

All employees receive a salary, and, while eligible for annual salary increases and bonuses based on overall performance, they do not receive any commissions or other benefits as a result of the services provided to you.

The remuneration paid to our directors reflects their individual contribution to the organisation and covers all aspects of performance.

We do not pay commissions or provide other benefits to anyone who refers prospective clients to us.

Associations and relationships

The Deloitte member firm in Australia (Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu) controls Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited. Please see www.deloitte.com/au/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.

We, and other entities related to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, do not have any formal associations or relationships with any entities that are issuers of financial products. However, we may provide professional services to issuers of financial products in the ordinary course of business.

What should you do if you have a complaint?

If you have a concern about our Report, please contact us:

We are providing general financial product advice

In our Report, we provide general financial product advice as we have not taken into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs, and you would not expect us to have done so. You should consider whether our general advice is appropriate for you, having regard to your own personal objectives, financial situation or needs.

If our advice is in connection with the acquisition of a financial product, you should read the relevant offer document carefully before making any decision about whether to acquire that product.

How are we remunerated?

Our fees are usually determined on a fixed fee or time cost basis plus reimbursement of any expenses incurred in providing the services. Our fees are agreed with, and paid by, those who engage us. You are not responsible for our fees.

We will receive a fee of approximately $260,000 exclusive of GST in relation to the preparation of our

The Complaints Officer PO Box N250 Grosvenor Place Sydney NSW 1220 [email protected] Phone: +61 2 9322 7000

If an issue is not resolved to your satisfaction, you can lodge a dispute with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority provides fair and independent financial services dispute resolution free to consumers.

www.afca.org.au 1800 931 678 (free call) Australian Financial Complaints Authority Limited GPO Box 3 Melbourne VIC 3001

What compensation arrangements do we have?

Deloitte Australia holds professional indemnity insurance that covers the financial services we provide. This insurance satisfies the compensation requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

13 May 2021

Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited, ABN 19 003 833 127, AFSL 241457 of Level 1 Grosvenor Place, 225 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and their affiliated entities are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more. Member of Deloitte Asia Pacific Limited and the Deloitte Network.

Target’s Statement

63

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited A.B.N. 19 003 833 127 AFSL 241457 Grosvenor Place 225 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box N250 Grosvenor Place Sydney NSW 1220 Australia

DX: 10307SSE Tel: +61 2 9322 7000 Fax: +61 2 9254 1198 www.deloitte.com.au

The Independent Directors The Independent Directors Primewest Group Limited Primewest Management Limited Level 1, 307 Murray Street as responsible entity for Perth WA 6000 Primewest Property Fund Level 1, 307 Murray Street Perth WA 6000

13 May 2021

Dear Directors

Re: Independent expert’s report

Introduction

On 19 April 2021, Centuria Capital Group (CNI)[1] announced a conditional off-market takeover offer (the Proposed Transaction) to acquire all of the securities in Primewest Group (PWG)[2] .

  • Under the Proposed Transaction, for each PWG stapled security, PWG securityholders will receive: • $0.20 cash

  • 0.473 CNI securities, which are also stapled securities

(collectively, the Consideration).

An overview of the Proposed Transaction is provided in Section 1 of our detailed report.

PWG has established an Independent Board Committee comprising independent non-executive directors Erin Flaherty and Hamish Beck to represent the interests of minority securityholders and assess whether the Proposed Transaction is in the best interests of those securityholders.

The full details of the Proposed Transaction are included in a Bidder’s Statement. The directors of PWG will issue a Target’s Statement, which will include their recommendation as to whether PWG securityholders should accept the Proposed Transaction.

Purpose of the report

Whilst there is no legal requirement for an independent expert’s report in respect of the Proposed Transaction, the directors of PWG (the Directors) have requested that Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited (Deloitte Corporate Finance) provide an independent expert’s report advising whether, in our opinion, the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable to PWG securityholders.

This report will be included in a Target’s Statement to be sent to PWG securityholders and has been prepared for the exclusive purpose of assisting PWG securityholders in their consideration of the Proposed Transaction.

1 A stapled group consisting of Centuria Capital Limited and Centuria Funds Management Limited as responsible entity of Centuria Capital Fund

2 A stapled group consisting of Primewest Group Limited and Primewest Management Ltd, as responsible entity of Primewest Property Fund

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

64 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Neither Deloitte Corporate Finance, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, nor any member or employee thereof, undertakes to be responsible to any person, other than the PWG securityholders and PWG, in respect of this report, including for any errors or omissions however caused.

Basis of evaluation

In undertaking the work associated with this report, we have had regard to Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 111 in relation to the content of an expert’s report and ASIC RG 112 in respect of the independence of experts. The Regulatory Guides prescribe standards of best practice in the preparation of independent expert’s reports.

To assess whether or not the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable to PWG securityholders, we have adopted the test of whether the Proposed Transaction is either fair and reasonable, not fair but reasonable, or neither fair nor reasonable, as set out in ASIC Regulatory Guide 111.

Summary and conclusion

In our opinion the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable. In arriving at this opinion, we have had regard to the following factors.

The Proposed Transaction is fair

According to ASIC RG 111, in order to assess whether the Proposed Transaction is fair, the independent expert is required to compare the market value of a security in PWG on a control basis with the market value of the Consideration under the Proposed Transaction. The Proposed Transaction is fair if the value of the Consideration is equal to or greater than the value of the securities subject to the offer.

Set out in the table below is a comparison of our assessment of the market value of a PWG security with the consideration offered by CNI.

Table 1: Assessment of fairness

$ Low High
Estimated market value of a PWG security (Section 6) 1.41 1.52
Estimated market value of Consideration offered (Section 7) 1.43 1.52
Premium of Consideration over market value of a PWG security 0.02 0.00

Source: Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

The value of the consideration offered by CNI is above the low end, and equal to the top end of the range of our estimate of the market value of a PWG security. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the Proposed Transaction is fair.

We have assessed the fairness of the value of the Consideration offered based on our assessment of the current fair market value of a security in the Proposed Merged Entity (PME) with reference to the trading in CNI securities post the announcement of the Proposed Transaction.

The price of the PME securities will vary in the future based on, market movements, expectations of underlying real estate valuations, future performance fees and earnings generated by co-investments. Similarly, these variables could also impact the underlying market value of a PWG security.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

3

Target’s Statement 65

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Valuation of PWG

In estimating the market value of a PWG security, we have adopted a sum of the parts approach. We have assessed the enterprise value of PWG’s core operations using the market multiples as our primary methodology. This method involves applying a multiple to an estimate of maintainable earnings.

Our valuation of a PWG security is summarised in the table below:

Table 2: Summary of valuation of PWG security

Unit Low High
Selected maintainable EBITDA $m 29.0 30.0
Maintainable EBITDA multiple on a control basis times 14.0 15.0
Enterprise value of PWG on a control basis $m 406.0 450.0
Co-investments $m 41.2 41.2
Non-operating assets $m 46.1 46.1
Net cash as at 30 June 2021 $m 66.9 66.9
Equity value on a control basis $m 560.2 604.2
Outstanding securities m 396.5 396.5
Equity value per PWG security $ 1.41 1.52

Source: Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

In considering maintainable earnings we have reviewed and adjusted (where applicable) the FY21 earnings as set out in the pro forma financial statements to derive an appropriate level of maintainable earnings for the purposes of the valuation of PWG’s business operations. The assessment of maintainable earnings (and that disclosed in the pro forma financial statements) is substantially higher than historical reported earnings of the business reflecting the growth the business has experienced in its recent history.

In selecting the appropriate multiple to apply in the valuation of a PWG security we have had regard to the EBITDA multiples implied by the trading in comparable companies.

In our selection of an appropriate multiple to apply to PWG, we have considered listed real estate entities involved in property funds management (as noted in Table 29). However, we do not consider these entities provide the best evidence of an appropriate multiple for a stand-alone property funds management business, such as PWG, due to the following:

  • the significantly smaller, or larger scale, of the real estate entities, in comparison to PWG, in terms of both market capitalisation and AUM

  • more diversified earnings streams in comparison to PWG, including significant co-investments and development income

  • larger proportion of co-investments, in comparison to market capitalisation, relative to PWG

  • the market’s tendency to focus on the two points above when assessing the risk and return profile of the entities and consequently pricing their securities

  • inability to identify, accurately, current stand-alone earnings (revenue and expenses) directly attributable to funds management operations from financial statements or broker consensus.

We have also considered equities funds managers in our selection of an appropriate multiple for PWG. The earnings, and therefore multiples implied by the trading in securities of equities funds managers are less affected by earnings from co-investments than the real estate entities. We therefore consider equities funds managers provide a more directly comparable reference point to value PWG in comparison to the majority of the real estate entities. However, the implied valuation multiples of the equities funds managers can only form a starting point and appropriate adjustment needs to be made to recognise differences between equities funds management markets and property funds management markets, including factors such as the nature of the AUM, fee structures and returns vs real estate fund investments.

As CNI has a substantial funds management business, we considered whether CNI is a suitable comparable company.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

4

66 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Whilst aspects of CNI’s activities are operationally comparable to those of PWG, there are some distinct differences:

  • CNI’s funds management platform is significantly larger than that of PWG, with approximately double the AUM ($10.5bn in comparison to $5.0bn)

  • CNI’s AUM is more geographically diversified with operations in New Zealand in addition to Australia. Whereas PWG’s geographic exposure is significantly more concentrated in the Western Australia market (54% of the funds management portfolio), however, PWG has a broader range of sector exposures

  • PWG is heavily reliant on the Founding Directors (Jim Litis, John Bond and David Schwartz) to source and acquire new properties for its funds as well as their relationships with investors who invest in the underlying funds

  • CNI has substantial property investments and property development investments compared to PWG which has a much smaller proportion of property investments and no major property development investments.

Taking into account these factors we consider that PWG should be valued at a discount to CNI.

Our assessment of the selected multiple for PWG also had regard to recent transactions involving property funds management businesses and property funds management rights. These transactions are operationally comparable to PWG, however the transactions identified involved smaller or less diversified businesses (i.e. single fund/platform businesses). Given this, in our opinion, PWG should be valued at a premium to the multiples implied in these transactions.

Having regard to the above, we formed the view PWG should be valued using an EBITDA multiple that represents a premium to the comparable transactions and the listed equities funds management companies we identified but at a discount to CNI.

After calculating the enterprise value of PWG’s core operations we adjusted for co-investments held by PWG, other non-operating assets and incorporated the net cash position of PWG.

We cross-checked our estimate of the enterprise value of PWG using the percentage of AUM method (AUM multiple), based on the AUM multiples observed in comparable listed companies and transactions in the funds management sector, and a high level capitalisation of earnings method (which is a method under the income approach and is akin to the discounted cash flow method).

We also considered the security price of PWG, notwithstanding illiquid trading in PWG securities. The PWG security price on the day prior to the announcement of the Proposed Transaction sits within, but at the low end of, our assessed valuation range. Furthermore, since the announcement of the Proposed Transaction, PWG securities have not traded at a price above our valuation range.

Having regard to all of these factors, we consider our valuation range for a PWG security is supported by these cross checks. Refer to Section 6 for further discussion of our valuation of PWG.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

5

Target’s Statement 67

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Valuation of consideration

The valuation of a security in the PME has been assessed on a minority interest basis because, if the Proposed Transaction is successful, PWG securityholders will hold a portfolio interest and will therefore become minority securityholders in the PME.

We have valued the Consideration offered to PWG securityholders under the Proposed Transaction at between $1.43 and $1.52 per security as set out in the table below.

Table 3: Summary of the valuation of the Consideration

Unit Low High
Cash Consideration per PWG security $ 0.20 0.20
Scrip Consideration
Value of a security in PME1 $ 2.60 2.80
CNI securities for 1 PWG security (Merger Ratio) ratio 0.473 0.473
Implied scrip Consideration per PWG security $ 1.23 1.32
Total Consideration per PWG security $ 1.43 1.52

Note: 1. The value of a security in PME has been determined with reference to the analysis of trading in the securities of CNI post the announcement of the Proposed Transaction. Source: Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

To provide additional evidence of the market value of a security in the PME, we cross-checked the valuation of the PME with reference to market multiples implied by trading in listed companies, and transactions in comparable companies. We consider the resulting implied multiples reasonable relative to the comparable listed companies and transactions in comparable companies.

The Proposed Transaction is reasonable

In accordance with ASIC RG 111 an offer is reasonable if it is fair. On this basis, in our opinion the Proposed Transaction is reasonable. We have also considered the following factors.

The Founding Directors, who own 53% of PWG securities, have agreed to vend their PWG securities into the Proposed Transaction

Whilst the Proposed Transaction is subject to some conditions, one of which is 90% of PWG securityholders accepting the Proposed Transaction, the Founding Directors, who own 53% of PWG securities have agreed to vend their PWG securities into the Proposed Transaction.

Whilst PWG securityholders are receiving control value, they are not receiving a control premium relative to recent market trading in the securities

Our assessment of the market value of a PWG security has been undertaken on a control basis and consequently includes the value of control (although we do highlight that relative to minority securityholders, the Founding Directors have effective joint control with their 53% ownership interest).

The consideration offered under the Proposed Transaction of $1.43 to $1.52 per PWG security, based on our valuation range of a security in the PME, represents a premium of between nil and 1.2% over our assessed value of a PWG security, which has been assessed inclusive of control.

PWG securityholders are, therefore, not receiving a substantial premium relative to the recent market trading in PWG securities. This could be explained by several factors including:

  • PWG is a well-managed business with limited opportunities to run it more efficiently or profitably

  • there are limited synergies that could be realised in a market transaction.

It is worthwhile noting that trading in PWG securities is illiquid. Therefore, the market trading price prior to the announcement of the Proposed Transaction may not provide strong evidence of the fundamental value of a PWG security.

In the absence of the Proposed Transaction or an alternative proposal, PWG’s securities may trade below the prices achieved since the announcement of the Proposed Transaction and our assessed valuation range, which was undertaken on a control basis.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

6

68 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

The Consideration results in PWG securityholders receiving securities in the PME and therefore retaining exposure to a real estate funds management business but with increased scale and diversification

The PME is anticipated to have $15.5bn of AUM, a 209% increase in AUM for PWG securityholders, across a range of asset classes and geographic locations. In particular, after the Proposed Transaction, PWG securityholders will have diversified exposure to the industrials sector (increasing from 11% to 28%) and gain exposure to a health care real estate platform, which PWG does not have.

This increased scale and diversification may provide access to a broader range of acquisition opportunities across Australia and New Zealand.

In addition, the PME is expected to be well placed for ASX/S&P 200 index inclusion, with an estimated pro forma market capitalisation of $2.2 billion[3] .

Following completion of the Proposed Transaction, PWG securityholders will hold up to 23% of the total issued securities in the PME. Given this, PWG securityholders will have their exposure to the potential upside and value of PWG’s funds management portfolio significantly diluted. In particular, PWG securityholders’ exposure to the high growth potential of the ‘daily needs’ and ‘agriculture’ platforms will be diluted from 21% to 9% and 7% to 2%, respectively.

Approximately 54% of PWG’s current AUM is associated with property in Western Australia creating a concentration risk for the group. The Proposed Transaction provides PWG securityholders with increased scale and diversification of categories and locations, which would have, in the absence of the Proposed Transaction, taken time to achieve through organic growth. If the Proposed Transaction is successful, exposure to the Western Australia property market will decrease to 23%.

Refer to Section 5.1 for further details on the AUM of the PME.

PWG securityholders will benefit from earnings per security (EPS) accretion

Should the Proposed Transaction proceed, it is anticipated that the PME would deliver pro forma EPS of 6.8 cents in FY21 as disclosed in the Bidder’s Statement[4] . This implies a 19% increase in EPS for PWG securityholders. Further details of the basis of calculation are set out in the Bidder’s Statement.

PWG securityholders will be exposed to leverage

The Proposed Transaction is expected to result in PWG securityholders being exposed to leverage (currently nil in PWG as compared to 7.5% in PME). PWG has traditionally funded operations and acquisitions through cash reserves.

PWG securityholders will gain greater exposure to co-investments, property investments and development property investments

PME will hold a greater level of co-investment, property investment and property development investments on the balance sheet in comparison to PWG on a stand-alone basis, as CNI holds a disproportionately greater level of such positions (37%[5] ) relative to PWG (14%[6] ). This is evidenced through the increase in NTA per security from $0.37 on a stand-alone PWG basis to $0.86 in PME.

PWG securityholders will have greater exposure to performance fees

Under the PME, PWG securityholders will be exposed to a higher proportion of performance fees as a percentage of total revenue. Accounting recognition policies aside, performance fees are dependent on a range of variables, including asset specific performance and market performance, and thus this revenue stream is considered more risky than other revenue streams. Despite this risk, it also presents the opportunity for larger upside in earnings compared to those of PWG on a stand-alone basis.

3 Based on CNI’s last close price of $2.77 on 16 April 2021 multiplied by securities on issue post the completion of the Proposed Transaction (assuming CNI acquires 100% of PWG)

4 Pro forma impact assuming the Proposed Transaction had occurred on 1 July 2020. Based on PWG’s FY21 EPS guidance of 5.8 cents per security; assumes the cash consideration is reinvested in CNI securities at the last close price of $2.77 on 16 April 2021; and aggregate post-tax synergies of $5.3m p.a. (assuming CNI acquired 100% of PWG)

5 Based on our mid-point valuation

6 Based on our midpoint valuation, and including VTH

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

7

Target’s Statement 69

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

The key executives of PWG who are familiar with the operations will assume roles within PME

Each of the Founding Directors of PWG (who are also executives of PWG) have agreed to remain a senior executive of the PME for a period of at least two years, on the same remuneration as currently provided by PWG. CNI’s current intention is to utilise PWG’s existing employees given the strong expertise across a range of geographies and sectors to continue to expand the combined platform.

In addition, the Founding Directors have entered into restraint and escrow agreements with CNI, as set out in Section 1 of this report. Whilst the Founding Directors were subject to escrow arrangements since the initial public offering (IPO) of PWG (33.3% of securities held at the IPO continuing until June 2022, and 33.3% continuing until June 2023), the restraint agreements under the PME provide greater protection than is the case under PWG on a stand-alone basis.

The Proposed Transaction provides some liquidity to PWG securityholders

Currently PWG securities are thinly traded on the ASX due to the minimal free float, as the Founding Directors hold approximately 53% of the securities outstanding. By way of example, it would take 4.3 years for the 47% of PWG securities held by all other securityholders (i.e. free float) to be traded on the ASX based on the number of securities traded over the last 12 months.

By accepting the Proposed Transaction, securityholders will receive cash of $0.20 and 0.473 CNI securities per PWG security. The cash component provides some liquidity to PWG securityholders for their current holdings.

In addition, given the greater trading liquidity in CNI securities, there is greater opportunity for PWG securityholders to sell their CNI securities without price disruption from illiquid trading. As an example, the CNI securities that the 47% of PWG securityholders will receive would take 0.3 years to trade based on the number of CNI securities traded over the last 12 months. In addition, there is potential for this time period to decrease (i.e. liquidity to increase further) should CNI could be included in the S&P/ASX 200 Index.

Distributions

PWG securityholders will also be entitled to a distribution of 2.9 cents per security for the half year ending 30 June 2021. The Consideration will not be affected by this distribution (if the record date for the distribution is prior to 30 June 2021). The intended record date is set for 25 May 2021.

Conclusion on reasonableness

In accordance with ASIC RG 111, the Proposed Transaction is reasonable as it is fair.

Opinion

In our opinion, the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable to PWG securityholders.

An individual securityholder’s decision in relation to the Proposed Transaction may be influenced by his or her particular circumstances. If in doubt the securityholder should consult an independent adviser, who should have regard to their individual circumstances.

This opinion should be read in conjunction with our detailed report which sets out our scope and findings.

Yours faithfully

Tapan Parekh Authorised Representative Number: 461009 Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited

Stephen Reid Authorised Representative Number: 461011 Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

8

70 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Glossary

Glossary
Reference Definition
$ Australian dollars and numbers may be subject to rounding
1HYxx First 6 months of the financial year ending 30 June 20xx
A-REIT Australian real estate investment trust
ASIC Australian Securities and Investments Commission
ASX Australian Securities Exchange
AUM Assets under management
Bidder’s Statement Bidders statement issued by CNI in relation to the Proposed Transaction
bn Billion
c Cents
CNI Centuria Capital Group
Consideration The offer consideration of $0.20 cash, plus 0.473 CNI securities per PWG security
Deloitte Corporate
Finance
Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited
Directors Executive Directors, John Bond, David Schwartz and Jim Litis, and Independent
Directors, Erin Flaherty and Hamish Beck
EBIT Earnings before interest and tax
EBITDA Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation
EPS Earnings per security
EV Enterprise value
Founding Directors John Bond (Executive Chairman), David Schwartz (Managing Director) and Jim Litis
(Executive Director), who are the only Executive Directors of PWG
FYxx Financial year ended 30 June 20xx
GAV Gross asset value
Independent Directors Non-Executive Directors, Erin Flaherty and Hamish Beck
IPO PWG initial public offering on 8 Nov 2019
IRR Internal rate of return
m Million
Management Management of PWG
n/a Not applicable
nmf Not meaningful
NPAT Net profit after tax
NTA Net tangible assets
NZ$ New Zealand dollars
p.a. Per annum
PME, Proposed Merged The entity established following the completion of the Proposed Transaction,
Entity comprised of CNI and PWG
Proposed Transaction CNI’s proposed off-market takeover of PWG
PWG Primewest Group Limited (including Primewest Property Fund as a stapled group)
REIT Real estate investment trust
Target’s Statement Target statement issued by PWG in relation to the Proposed Transaction
VTH ASX listed A-REIT Vitalharvest Freehold Trust
VWAP Volume weighted average price
WALE Weighted average lease expiry

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

9

Target’s Statement 71

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Contents

1 Overview of the Proposed Transaction 11
2 Basis of evaluation 13
3 Profile of PWG 15
4 Profile of CNI 27
5 Profile of the Proposed Merged Entity 37
6 Valuation of PWG 42
7 Valuation of the Consideration 52
Appendix 1: Context to the report 55
Appendix 2: Valuation methodologies 57
Appendix 3: Comparable companies 58
Appendix 4: Comparable transactions 59

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

10

72 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

1 Overview of the Proposed Transaction

Background to the Proposed Transaction

On 19 April 2021, PWG announced that it had entered into a Bid Implementation Deed in relation to a merger with CNI. The Proposed Transaction is to be implemented by of an off-market takeover offer made by CNI to PWG securityholders.

Under the Proposed Transaction, for each PWG stapled security, PWG securityholders will receive Consideration of:

  • $0.20 cash

  • 0.473 CNI securities, which are also stapled securities.

PWG has established an Independent Board Committee comprising independent non-executive directors Erin Flaherty and Hamish Beck to represent the interests of minority securityholders and assess whether the Proposed Transaction is in the best interests of those securityholders.

Full details of the Proposed Transaction are provided in the Target’s Statement.

Rationale for the Proposed Transaction

The Directors are of the view the Proposed Transaction provides PWG securityholders with an enhanced investment proposition in the PME relative to PWG on a standalone basis, due to[7] :

  • an increase in scale and relevance with a combined AUM of $15.5bn

  • increased geographic and sector diversification, allowing PWG securityholders to be exposed to a broader range of opportunities

  • access to new distribution channels

  • earnings accretion of 19% as estimated by management of PWG and CNI

  • material synergies to support growth of AUM, expansion of services across the businesses, removal of duplicate corporate costs and tax synergies. Management of CNI and PWG have disclosed estimated post-tax synergies of $5.3m p.a.

The Directors have unanimously recommended that PWG securityholders accept the Proposed Transaction in the absence of a superior proposal and subject to an independent expert opinion that the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable to PWG securityholders.

Each of the PWG Directors, including the Founding Directors, who collectively hold 53% of the total securities in PWG, have confirmed their intention to accept the Proposed Transaction.

Key conditions of the Proposed Transaction

The Proposed Transaction is subject to certain conditions, the most significant are as follows:

  • minimum acceptance of at least 90% of PWG securities

  • holders of PWG options agreeing to their options being cancelled or otherwise transferred to PWG for a cash amount

  • no material adverse change in relation to PWG

  • change of control consents in relation to downstream funds.

Further detail on the conditions that the Proposed Transactions is subject to are set out in the Target’s Statement.

7 As disclosed in the PWG ASX announcement on 19 April 2021

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

11

Target’s Statement 73

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

The Founding Directors of PWG have entered into a voluntary escrow deed in relation to the CNI Securities they will receive under the Proposed Transaction. Under the deed, the Founding Directors will be restricted in dealing with the CNI Securities for 12 months from issue (in respect of 50% of the securities), and 24 months from issue (in respect of the remaining 50% of the securities). Each of the Founding Directors have also entered into restraint deeds with PWG in relation to their personal investments and interests in the private funds managed by PWG. The restrictions in these deeds last for up to three years and include restrictions on disposing of managed fund investments or being involved in the business of a competitor to the PME. For further details on the voluntary escrow deed or restraint deed, refer to the “Directors’ recommendation” section of the Target’s Statement.

CNI has exclusivity until the end of the offer period (being a minimum of 1 month from 19 April 2021, and this exclusivity can be extended to a maximum of 12 months) with a break fee of $2.0m payable by PWG to CNI in certain circumstances. Refer to Section 11 of the Bid Implementation Deed or the Section 10 of the Target’s Statement for full details of the break fee arrangements.

Intentions if the Proposed Transaction is accepted

If the Proposed Transaction is successful, PWG will become a wholly owned subsidiary of CNI and be delisted from the ASX.

Following full acceptance of the Proposed Transaction, PWG securityholders would own approximately 23.8% of the PME, as illustrated in the table below.

Table 4: Securities in CNI and the PME

Table 4: Securities in CNI and the PME
m Number of securities % in PME
CNI securitiesprior to the Proposed Transaction 600.2 76.2%
Securities issued aspart of the Consideration 187.61 23.8%
Pro forma securities in the PME 787.8 100.0%
Note:
1.
Represents 0.473 securities for each of the 397m PWG securities.
Sources: CNI Financial Report FY20, CNI investor presentation on the Proposed Transaction

PWG securityholders will receive full entitlement to any PWG distributions declared, with a record date prior to 30 June 2021. However, to the extent that PWG declares any distributions, with a record date after 30 June 2021, CNI may deduct from the Consideration the cash amount or value of any distributions (or other rights) attaching to the PWG security, which the PWG securityholder receives or is entitled to receive.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

12

74 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

2 Basis of evaluation

Guidance

In evaluating whether the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable to PWG securityholders, we had regard to ASIC RG 111 in relation to the content of expert’s reports and ASIC RG 112 in relation to the independence of experts.

ASIC RG 111

This regulatory guide provides guidance in relation to the content of independent expert’s reports prepared for a range of transactions.

ASIC RG 111 refers to a ‘control transaction’ as being the acquisition (or increase) of a controlling interest in a company that could be achieved, for example, by way of a takeover offer, scheme of arrangement, approval of an issue of shares using item 7 of s611, a selective capital reduction or selective buy back under Chapter 2J.

The Proposed Transaction is a control transaction being executed by a takeover offer.

In respect of control transactions, under ASIC RG 111 an offer is:

  • fair, when the value of the consideration is equal to or greater than the value of the securities subject to the proposed transaction. The comparison must be made assuming 100% ownership of the target company (i.e. including a control premium)

  • reasonable, if it is fair, or, despite not being fair, after considering other significant factors, securityholders should accept the offer under the proposed transaction, in the absence of any higher bids before the close of the offer.

To assess whether the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable to PWG securityholders, we have adopted the tests of whether the Proposed Transaction is either fair and reasonable, not fair but reasonable, or neither fair nor reasonable, as set out in ASIC Regulatory Guide 111.

ASIC RG 112

RG 112 primarily focuses on the independence of experts and provides little guidance on evaluating transactions.

Evaluation of fairness and reasonableness

In evaluating whether or not the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable to PWG securityholders, we have made a separate assessment of whether, or not, the Proposed Transaction is ‘fair’ and ‘reasonable’ as required by RG 111.56. The criteria used to assess the fairness and reasonableness of the Proposed Transaction is set out below.

Fairness

We have assessed whether the Proposed Transaction is fair by comparing the consideration per security being offered by CNI with the assessed market value of a PWG security on a control basis. If PWG securityholders are receiving equal to, or more than, our assessment of the market value of PWG securities, then the Proposed Transaction would be fair. If the consideration is less than our assessment of the market value of PWG securities, then the Proposed Transaction would be not fair.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

13

Target’s Statement 75

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Reasonableness

ASIC RG 111 considers an offer in respect of a control transaction, to be reasonable if either:

  • the offer is fair

  • despite not being fair, but considering other significant factors, securityholders should accept the offer in the absence of any higher bid before the close of the offer.

To assess the reasonableness of the Proposed Transaction we considered the following significant factors in addition to determining whether the Proposed Transaction is fair:

  • the existing securityholding of the Founding Directors in PWG and their intentions with respect to accepting the consideration

  • the alternatives available to PWG securityholders

  • the likely market price and liquidity of PWG securities in the absence of the Proposed Transaction

  • other implications associated with PWG securityholders accepting or rejecting the Proposed Transaction.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

14

76 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

3 Profile of PWG

Overview of PWG

PWG is an ASX-listed real estate fund manager and developer with 397m stapled securities on issue and a market capitalisation of approximately $581m based on the closing price of $1.465 per security as at 16 April 2021 (the day prior to the announcement of the Proposed Transaction).

PWG has $5.0bn of AUM comprising over 84 separate listed and unlisted property syndicates and funds across several asset classes. The management of these funds involves sourcing, acquiring, managing, and disposing of real estate assets on behalf of its investors.

PWG employs a value-add and counter cyclical[8] investment strategy to deliver value to its securityholders. Its strategy involves generating a portfolio that achieves diversification of geography, sectors and lease expiry through investment in existing properties and potential future acquisitions. PWG continues to scale its existing platforms by launching new income and development funds, enhancing its institutional mandate offering and expanding its investor base through new distribution networks.

In addition to its core real estate funds management operation, PWG holds the following investments:

  • listed equities, including a 19.9% equity interest in VTH[9]

  • interests in unlisted property funds managed by the stapled group.

Assets under management

A breakdown of PWG’s portfolio by sector and fund type is shown below :

Figure 1: PWG property funds management Figure 2: PWG property funds management sector exposure fund types

Note:

  1. Other includes tourism, land, indirect holdings and developments. Sources: Target’s Statement, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

PWG’s AUM can be broken down into four major fund types:

  • Unlisted : syndicate funds comprising assets across a range of sectors. Unlisted funds include multi-asset, multi--asset open ended and single-asset funds

  • Listed : aims to establish listed real estate investment trusts which PWG would manage. As part of this strategy, goFARM Asset Management Pty Ltd, the asset manager of VTH, was acquired. VTH is the largest aggregation of berry and citrus farms in Australia and its current portfolio is 100% occupied with a WALE of 6.0 years

  • 8 Involves acquiring undervalued assets and investing against the property cycle

  • 9 As at the date of this report, VTH is the subject of a takeover from an entity associated with Macquarie. This is discussed in further detail in Section 3.7

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

15

Target’s Statement 77

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

  • Mandate : comprises the Office mandate and Daily Needs Convenience Retail mandate with $580m and $126m AUM, respectively. PWG continues to expand its mandate portfolio by furthering its relationships with both local and offshore institutional investors:

  • the Office mandate strategy involves identifying and acquiring undervalued office assets in Perth and Brisbane. PWG completes capital works whilst leasing these assets to increase WALE and occupancy

  • the Daily Needs Convenience Retail mandate was established in 2020 and focuses on non-discretionary retailers such as supermarkets and chemists

  • Bespoke : the Primewest Bespoke model was established in 2020 and aims to offer asset management and property services to high net worth families and corporates who have large property portfolios. PWG is currently expanding this service across the country.

All properties within the PWG portfolio are located within Australia, with the exception of two properties located on the west coast of the United States of America. The majority of the properties are situated in Western Australia, with 85 properties making up approximately 54% of total AUM. The figure below shows the geographical breakdown of the portfolio.

Figure 3: PWG AUM by geography

Note:

  1. Other includes two properties located in the USA ($98m) and two indirect holdings ($44m). Sources: Target’s statement, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

16

78 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Recent acquisitions and disposals

PWG, on behalf of underlying funds, has made the following property acquisitions and disposals since November 2019 when it listed on the ASX:

Figure 4: PWG AUM changes (as a result of acquisitions and disposals) timeline[1]

Note: 1. Only completed acquisitions and disposals over $1m since November 2019 disclosed. Sources: ASX releases, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

PWG is constantly seeking to grow the AUM within existing and new funds that it manages and has a pipeline of assets under review. In particular, PWG has placed a focus on expanding its agriculture exposure through its unlisted agriculture fund. In this regard, PWG is currently pursuing several agriculture assets which are at various stages of the acquisition process. PWG expects that these transactions would add approximately $395m to AUM before the close of FY21.

On 28 April 2021 PWG announced that it had formed a joint venture with a fund advised by Blackrock Real Assets and has successfully exchanged contracts to acquire the Perth office tower, 140 St Georges Terrace. PWG noted that it will provide property management services and acquire a co-investment interest consistent with other real estate mandates. PWG is in the process of acquiring two additional assets on behalf of its institutional mandates which are expected to increase AUM by $104m.

Management agreements

PWG holds individual management agreements with each fund or trust that it provides services to. These agreements outline the services provided, fee structure and tenure of the manager, including circumstances under which the manager may be removed. The structure and key terms of these agreements are similar across the funds/trusts.

The following table provides a summary of the key terms contained in the management agreements.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

17

Target’s Statement 79

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Table 5: Key terms of management agreements

Service type Service type Description Description Fees charged Fees charged Fees received1
($m)
Asset management
Services include asset strategy, financial 0.35% to 0.65% of 16.3
fees reporting, appointment and supervision of GAV p.a.
property managers and leasing agents, and
development/ refurbishment strategies
Property services Comprises leasing fees, development 8.5% to 15.5% of 4.5
fees management fees and financing fees average annual rent for
Leasing services include services to secure leasing fees
new tenants or retain existing tenants such 4.0% of construction
as marketing, stakeholder responses, cost for development
inspections, negotiations, lease management fees
documentation and tenant coordination 0.25% for arranging
Development management services include the renewal or
development of property, capital replacement of
refurbishment and project management of financing facilities, as
tenancy work well as debt financing
Financing services relate to debt financing
for a fund, either at acquisition or
subsequently on renewal or extension of
for new acquisitions
(assuming 50/50
debt/equity financing)
existing loan facilities
Transaction fees Includes establishment fees earned on the 1.5% to 2.5% 5.5
acquisition of new assets and sales fees on acquisition fee on new
the disposal of assets assets
Payable on settlement of the property 2.0% sales fee payable
Services include originating a purchase or
preparing for sale, negotiating and
on sale value of the
assets on disposal
executing the transaction, and establishing
or winding up the fund
Performance fees Paid if the fund has outperformed the 20.0% on excess 5.6
agreed performance hurdle return above a hurdle
rate of 8.0% to 12.0%
Rights to remove May be removed through the passing of a n/a n/a
trustee/manager special resolution of investors that the
trustee should be removed or resolution by
a majority of investors
Note:
1. Fees received in FY20.

Sources: PWG Product disclosure statement and prospectus, PWG 30 June 2020 annual report

PWG’s revenue is predominantly generated from asset management fees, property services fees, transaction fees and performance fees. At the time of PWG’s listing on the ASX in November 2019, approximately 48% of AUM had asset management fees calculated on 0.65% of GAV, whilst fees for a further 29% of AUM were calculated on 0.50% of GAV.

The fee arrangements can generally be amended by the manager/trustee with the agreement of more than 75% of investors.

The term of the funds generally ranges between three and ten years. These can normally be amended by the manager/trustee with the agreement of the majority of investors. Under normal circumstances, PWG would seek an extension of its funds, six months before expiry.

Key drivers to performance

Fee income is ultimately driven by the value and operating performance of the underlying properties held by the funds and trusts for which PWG holds management rights.

3.5.1 Property values

Asset management fees were the largest component of revenue in FY20, which is directly driven by the value of the underlying fund properties. Since June 2015, PWG has steadily grown AUM from $2.2bn to $4.9bn as at December 2020. This has been achieved through acquisitions as well as property revaluations.

As shown in the below figure, PWG made approximately $1bn worth of acquisitions between 30 June 2019 and 31 December 2020, whilst divesting $47m in property. These acquisitions and disposals

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

18

80 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

generated transaction fees which totalled $5.5m in FY20. Revaluations over this same period increased AUM by $124m.

Figure 5: Historical AUM

==> picture [364 x 113] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

5,002
5,000 376 22 4,856
658 (47) 102 4,458
4,000 3,745
3,200
3,000
2,600
2,200 2,300
2,000
1,000
0
AuM $ millions
----- End of picture text -----

Sources: Management, PWG FY20 results presentation, PWG HY21 results presentation

PWG has noted that its exposure to the impact of COVID-19 has been limited due to its largest revenue segment, asset management fees, being calculated on the value of underlying properties. The independent valuations conducted as at 30 June 2020 did not result in any significant changes to property values, whilst independent valuations undertaken at 31 December 2020 largely related to refinancing requirements. In addition, across the portfolio, management of PWG do not anticipate any material movement in property values through to 30 June 2021.

3.5.2 Lease profile

Leasing fees are payable at 8.5% to 15.5% of average annual rent. Management has noted that a significant portion of leasing fees are generated from the renewal or releasing of current properties rather than the acquisition of additional properties.

PWG has a diverse tenant base across the portfolio with major tenants including Bunnings, Woolworths and Coles. As PWG continues to increase the number of properties under its management, fees earned from leasing services continue to grow.

3.5.3 Development management

Development management fees are generally 4.0% of construction cost and include development of property, capital refurbishment and project management. Set out in the table below is a summary of projects being developed by PWG, with anticipated development timeframes and projected construction costs to be incurred:

Table 6: Development summary

Project size Number of projects Construction cost Construction fee Construction fee
($m) (%) ($m)
<$0.25m 27 2.1 4% 0.2
$0.25m to $1m 26 11.5 4% 0.5
$1m to $5m 4 8.3 4% 0.3
$5m to $10m - - 4% -
>$10m 2 24.4 4% 1.0
Total 59 46.4 4% 2.0

Source: Management

3.5.4 Financing fees

Financing services relate to debt financing for the underlying funds either at acquisition or extension of existing loan facilities. This is generally calculated at 0.25% of the debt arranged. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, PWG observed that banks and other financial institutions reduced the average

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

19

Target’s Statement 81

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

term of the facilities which resulted in increased fees due to higher frequency of arranging debt. Management does not expect this trend to continue going forward.

3.5.5 Performance fees

Performance fees are agreed individually with the fund and are payable when the fund outperforms the agreed performance hurdle, however not all funds managed by PWG have performance fee arrangements. Performance fees received have a lumpy profile historically due to the varying hurdles that need to be achieved or the reliance on the property needing to be sold. PWG received $5.6m in performance fees in FY20 and did not receive any performance fees in FY19. In respect of FY21, Management does not anticipate any performance fees will be earned.

Management team

PWG key staff and roles are summarised in the below table.

Table 7: PWG management team

Function Responsibilities Responsibilities Key personnel Tenure
(years)
Key Overseeing and monitoring the overall John Bond (Executive chairman) 25
executives
and directors
operation and stewardship of PWG including
long-term growth, profitability, strategies,
David Schwartz (Managing Director) 25
polices and financial objectives Jim Litis (Executive Director) 25
Sourcing acquisition opportunities including
pursuing and maintaining institutional and
Erin Flaherty (Non-Executive Director) 1.5
syndicate relationships Hamish Beck (Non-Executive Director) 1.5
Asset and Managing tenant engagement and dialogue to Bruce McCully (Head of Asset and 1
property understand tenants’ medium to long term Property Management)
management occupancy requirements Richard Mulroney (Head of Property 2
Assessment of external property managers’ Finance)
performance
Maximisation of rental income through
effective negotiation and avoidance of
impending vacancies through the effective re-
leasing of space
Investment Identifying and delivering investment Julian Lodge (Chief Investment 19
opportunities whilst working closely with the Officer)
asset management team to deliver desired
outcomes
Distribution Identifying and delivering business-to- Adam O’Donoghue (Head of 1 / 131
business growth opportunities as well as Distribution)
growth in PWG’s Bespoke offering
Oversight and management of investor
relations
Finance and Internal and external financial reporting David Creasy (Chief Financial Officer) 3
support requirements including preparation of budgets
for the entity and individual properties,
internal monitoring and reporting, external
statutory reporting and audits

Note:

  1. Previously Head of Asset Management at PWG for 13 years. Sources: Management, PWG website, PWG 30 June 2020 annual report

Investments

PWG holds the following direct investments:

  • listed ordinary shares: as at 31 March 2021, PWG held shares in Clime Investment Management Limited, which is listed on the ASX, with a market value of $3.0m (this was valued at $3.2m as at 31 December 2020)

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

20

82 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

  • property funds managed by the stapled group: as at 31 March 2021, PWG held interests in unlisted funds of $32.2m, being a substantial increase from its holdings as at 31 December 2020 which were $4.3m (primarily due to additional investments made by PWG)

  • Vitalharvest Freehold Trust: PWG, via Primewest Property Fund, previously held a 19.9% interest in VTH (36.8m units), which itself is the subject a takeover from entities associated with Macquarie. At the date of this report, Macquarie had exercised a call option over 30.0m units held by PWG in VTH for net proceeds of $29.3m. PWG’s remaining interest (6.8m units) in VTH was valued at $8.5m based on the takeover offer. We note that no capital gains tax is payable by PWG upon the realised gain on the sale of these units as the returns are distributed to individual unitholders of the Primewest Property Fund.

Securities in PWG

3.8.1 Stapled security

PWG is structured as a stapled group comprising Primewest Group Limited and Primewest Property Fund and their controlled entities.

Shares in Primewest Group Limited and units in Primewest Property Fund are stapled together to form a stapled security, such that a share in Primewest Group Limited and a unit in Primewest Property Fund must be purchased or sold together[10] .

As at 31 March 2021, the substantial holders of PWG comprised Jim Litis, John Bond and David Schwartz who accounted for 53.3% of securities on issue.

Table 8: Substantial PWG securityholders as at 31 March 2021

Holder Securities held Ownership
(m) (%)
Jim Litis 71.5 18.0
John Bond 70.5 17.8
David Schwartz 69.3 17.5
Subtotal – Substantial holders 211.2 53.3
Others 185.3 46.7
Total securities 396.5 100.0

Source: Management

3.8.2 PWG capital structure

PWG’s capital structure as at 19 April 2021 is summarised in Table 9.

Table 9: PWG Capital Structure

Table 9: PWG Capital Structure
Security type Total number of securities
PWG Stapled Securities (including 28,000 restricted issued securities1) 396,547,747
Unlisted options (at listing price of $1.00)2 245,474
Unlisted options (3 year vesting at 20% above VWAP)2 257,500
Unlisted options (5 year vesting at 50% above VWAP)2 257,500
Unlisted options (3 year vesting at $1.05)2 450,000

Notes:

  1. Restricted issued securities refers to the securities issued to PWG employees as part of the IPO. These securities are subject to a restriction on disposal for a minimum period of 3 years

  2. These options will be dealt with separately to the Proposed Transaction as per Schedule 2 of the Bid Implementation Deed for CNI-PWG takeover.

Sources: PWG Product disclosure statement and prospectus, Bid Implementation Deed for CNI-PWG takeover

3.8.3 PWG security issuance

Prior to listing on the ASX, PWG had 238.6m issued securities. As a result of the IPO, 85m securities were issued to new securityholders at a price of $1.00 per security. In connection with listing on the ASX, 25.5m securities were issued to fund investors through the exercise of options. On completion of

10 As defined in the PWG Product disclosure statement and prospectus, 21 October 2019

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

21

Target’s Statement 83

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

the IPO, the total number of securities increased to 349.1m of which 60.5% were owned by the Founding Directors.

On 3 February 2021, PWG completed a $60m equity raise to support its underwriting capacity for new funds and co-investments. 47.4m securities were issued at a price of $1.27 per security.

Table 10: PWG securities issuance

Issuance date Event Securities Price per Total number
issued (m) security of securities
(m)
21 October 2019 Existing securityholders pre-IPO - - 238.6
8 November 2019 Options exercised upon IPO 25.5 $1.00 264.1
8 November 2019 New securities issued at IPO 85.0 $1.00 349.1
3 February 2021 Capital raise through equity placement 47.4 $1.27 396.5

Sources: Management, PWG Product disclosure statement and prospectus, ASX releases

3.8.4 Trading in PWG securities

The figure below illustrates movements in PWG’s security price on the ASX since its listing date.

Figure 6: PWG security price movements

==> picture [366 x 191] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
2.0 6.0
1.8
5.0
1.6
1.4
4.0
1.2
1.0 3.0
0.8
2.0
0.6
0.4
1.0
0.2
0.0 0.0
PWG volume (RHS) PWG share price (LHS) S&P/ASX 200 (LHS)(rebased) ASX 200 A-REIT index (LHS)(rebased)
Sources: S&P Capital IQ, ASX releases and Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis
Volume (m)
Share price ($)
Nov 2019 Dec 2019 Jan 2020 Feb 2020 Mar 2020 Apr 2020 May 2020 Jun 2020 Jul 2020 Aug 2020 Sep 2020 Oct 2020 Nov 2020 Dec 2020 Jan 2021 Feb 2021 Mar 2021 Apr 2021
----- End of picture text -----

As at 16 April 2021, liquidity in the trading of PWG securities over the previous twelve-month period was 11.9%[11] . This is considerably lower than the trading in PWG’s comparable peers, which average 81.4% over the same period. Factors impacting the low levels of liquidity in PWG securities include the substantial holdings of Founding Directors and other securityholders who are subject to voluntary escrow arrangement following the IPO of PWG (representing approximately 56% of securities on issue), and the interests of strategic and corporate investors. As such, only 34.3% of securities on issue are considered “free-float”[12] .

11 Calculated as the total volume of shares traded over the period over the average number of shares outstanding

12 S&P Capital IQ as at 6 May 2021

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

22

84 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Key announcements identified in the chart above are set out in the following table.

Table 11: Key events and announcements

# Date Announcement
1 Jan 20 Acquired West Perth Office Buildingand Mandurah Greenfields ShoppingCentre
PWG reported unaudited consolidated earnings results for the half-year ended December 2019. For
2 Feb 20 the period, PWG reported total revenue from continuing operations of $12.5m compared to $10.2m
ayearprior. Profit after tax was $3.1m compared to $5.0m ayearprior
PWG announced that in light of the uncertainties surrounding the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic, it was withdrawing its fiscal year 2020 forecast earnings and distribution guidance.
3 Mar 20 Despite withdrawing its distribution guidance, PWG intended to pay a fiscal year 2020 distribution
per security based on a payout ratio of between 90%-95% of operating earnings per security which
was in line with its distributionpolicy
4 Apr 20 Primewest Agricultural Trust No.1 managed by PWG acquired Pinegetta Farm from Rennie family for
$4.8m
5 May 20 PWG agreed to acquire Osborne Park Facilityfrom Seven West Media Limited for$75m
6 Jun 20 PWG acquired SpringFarm ShoppingCentre from Woolworths GroupLimited
PWG acquired an 11.8% strategic interest in VTH as well as a right of first refusal over a further
6.2% interest. PWG confirms that the total consideration paid to acquire the strategic interest and
7 Jun 20 right of first refusal was approximately $19.3m. Further, PWG acquired GoFARM, the manager of
VTH Australia Pty Ltd, for $10m on 18 June 2020. The transaction was funded out of cash reserves
and left PWG with $43m in available cash. The Transaction increased PWG’s AUM by7% to $4.4bn
8 Jul 20 PWG acquired Pemulwuy Marketplace and West Ryde Marketplace from Charter Hall Retail
PartnershipNo.1 for$91.5m
PWG secured a second property in its recently established Primewest Agricultural Trust No 1
9 Aug 20 purchasing "Lamattina" on Victoria's Mornington Peninsula. The trust paid $42m for the 385 hectare
property, which is one of the largest land holdings and most significant "high value food" producers
on the Peninsula
10 Aug 20 PWG reported earnings results for FY20. For the year, PWG reported core earnings per security of
5.5 cents against 5.4 cents ayear ago. Proforma operatingearnings after tax of$19.2m
11 Dec 20 PWG’s Daily Needs Retail Property trust acquired Melbourne Square Shopping Centre from Yarra
Park CityPtyLtd for $70m
12 Feb 21 PWG completed an equity placement in the amount of$60.2m
PWG reported consolidated earnings results for the half-year ended 31 December 2020. For the
13 Apr 21 period, the company reported total revenues of $16.9m against $12.5m a year prior. Profit after
income tax from continuingoperations was $5.2m against $3.1m ayearprior
14 Apr 21 PWG acquired Robina Home + Life Large Format Retail complex fromQIC Limited for$66m
Sources: S&P Capital IQ, ASX releases

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

23

Target’s Statement 85

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Financial performance

The table below summarises PWG’s profit and loss statements for the financial years ended 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2020 and the half yearly accounts ended 31 December 2020 ( 1HY21 ).

Table 12: PWG financial performance

Table 12: PWG financial performance
$000 (unless otherwise stated) FY191 FY202 1HY21
Audited Audited Reviewed
Asset management fees 8,431 16,335 11,039
Project services fees 2,579 4,459 3,389
Transaction fees 7,224 5,463 1,819
Performance fees - 5,640 -
Other revenue 7 287 87
Total operating revenue 18,241 32,184 16,334
Employee costs (3,778) (6,107) (4,527)
General and administration (2,825) (4,154) (2,254)
Initial listing expenses & restructuring costs - (2,451) -
Operating EBITDA 11,637 19,473 9,553
Depreciation and amortisation (1) (3,542) (2,477)
Net interest revenue/(expense) 46 493 556
Income tax expense (3,206) (4,989) (2,424)
Gain/(loss) from financial assets - (2,098) 5,869
NPAT 8,476 9,338 11,078
AUM (end of period) ($bn) 3.7 4.5 4.9
Revenue growth (%) nmf nmf 1.5%3
EBITDA margin (%) 63.8% 60.5% 58.5%
Operating EPS (cents) nmf 3.7 2.0

Notes:

  1. On 1 October 2019, PWG completed a business combination whereby it acquired all of the outstanding shares of Primewest Funds Limited, Primewest Management Limited, Primewest P/Q Pty Ltd, PWG Property Pty Ltd and Primewest (USA) Trust and certain other corporate trustee entities as part of a corporate restructure. For the purposes of the business combination, Primewest Funds Limited has been treated as the acquiring entity. As such, comparative information for the year ended 30 June 2019 has been presented for Primewest Funds Limited

  2. Includes three months of Primewest Funds Limited and nine months of PWG (the combined entity) 3. Annualised.

Sources: PWG 30 June 2020 annual report, PWG 31 December 2020 interim financial report, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Total operating revenue was $32.2m in FY20, which largely comprised asset management fees of $16.3m. Asset management fees are positively correlated with the total AUM which increased from $3.7bn to $4.5bn over the prior twelve months.

Performance fees are agreed with the individual fund and are paid when the fund outperforms the agreed performance hurdle. In FY20, PWG received $5.6m in performance fees.

Transaction fees totalled $5.5m in FY20, however Management observed reduced 1HY21 transaction fees due to a reduction in acquisition activity in the market because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Revenue relating to project service fees was $4.5m in FY20 driven by the number of properties managed by PWG. PWG has observed that because of the COVID-19 pandemic, banks and other financial institutions have been offering loan extensions and renewals on shorter terms resulting in an increase in the frequency of debt financing fees collected by PWG.

PWG’s largest operating expense is employee costs which amounted to $6.1m in FY20.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

24

86 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

General and administration expenses totalled $4.2m in FY20 and largely comprised commissions ($1.3m), office and administration ($0.9m), professional and consulting fees ($0.9m) and advertising and promotion costs ($0.7m).

Financial position

We have summarised in the table below the financial position of PWG as at 30 June 2019, 30 June 2020 and 31 December 2020.

Table 13: PWG financial position

Table 13: PWG financial position
$000 (unless otherwise stated) FY19 FY20 1HY21
Audited Audited Reviewed
Trade and other receivables 539 8,035 2,473
Trade and other payables (631) (1,939) (945)
Net working capital (92) 6,097 1,528
Intangible assets - 130,535 119,942
Provisions (464) (3,415) (3,829)
Other funds employed - - (7,332)
Funds employed (464) 127,120 108,781
Financial assets at fair value 104 25,498 57,498
Right-of-use assets - 1,317 1,113
Deferred tax assets - 1,429 1,252
Other assets 38 458 417
Co-investments & other 142 28,701 60,281
Borrowings - - -
Borrowings – lease liabilities - (1,370) (1,180)
Less: cash and cash equivalents 3,498 54,146 39,279
Net cash/(debt) 3,498 52,776 38,099
Net assets 3,084 214,694 208,689
Ordinary securities outstanding 10 349,136 349,136
Net assets per security nmf $0.61 $0.60
NTA1 3,084 82,731 87,495
NTA per security ($) nmf $0.24 $0.25

Note:

  1. NTA is calculated as net assets less intangibles, deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities.

Sources: PWG 30 June 2018 annual report, PWG 30 June 2020 annual report, PWG 31 December 2020 interim financial report, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Cash and cash equivalents at June 2020 were $54.1m. This strong cash balance was primarily due to proceeds from the IPO ($82.8m), offset by the purchase of the initial 11.8% interest in VTH (as well as right of first refusal over an additional 6.2%) ($19.3m) and the associated management rights ($10.4m) as well as the required co-investment in the new Daily Needs Convenience Retail mandate. This balance decreased to $39.3m at December 2020 as PWG utilised the capital to finance investing activities including asset acquisitions and one-off corporate restructure costs. In February 2021, PWG completed an equity placement which raised $60.4m of cash.

Trade and other receivables largely relate to asset management, property service and performance fees from managed funds. As at June 2020, trade and other receivables totalled $8.0m of which $6.2m were related to unpaid performance fees and $1.5m to outstanding asset management and property service fees. A portion of these asset management and property service fees were related to the deferral of fees

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

25

Target’s Statement 87

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

in certain funds for the period April to June 2020 whilst rent collections in those funds were uncertain. Trade and other receivables balance decreased to $2.5m as at December 2020.

Intangibles as at June 2020 comprised management rights ($101.4m) and goodwill ($29.2m) and was recognised on the restructure of the group. The $10.6m decrease as at December 2020 was primarily attributed to the management rights of VTH restated as an asset held for sale.

As at December 2020, financial assets held at fair value totalled $57.5m which can be summarised in the table below.

Table 14: PWG financial asset summary

Table 14: PWG financial asset summary
$m
Loan receivable (from a fund managed by PWG) 3.8
Investment in listed equities 3.2
Investment in unlisted property funds managed by the stapled group 4.3
19.9% equity interest in VTH (including associated management rights) 46.2
Total financial assets 57.5

Sources: PWG 30 June 2018 annual report, PWG 30 June 2020 annual report, PWG 31 December 2020 interim financial report, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

PWG broker coverage

The table below shows the average broker consensus estimates available to us for PWG.

Table 15: Summary of broker consensus estimates (mean FY21 to FY22)

$m (unless otherwise stated) Actual1 Forecast2 Forecast2
FY20 FY21 FY22
Revenue 32.2 37.9 41.9
EBITDA 19.5 24.3 29.6
EPS (cents) 3.7 5.4 6.7
Revenue growth (%) n/a n/a 18%
EBITDA margin (%) 69% 64% 71%

Notes:

  1. PWG full year 30 June 2020 audited accounts

  2. Broker consensus. Revenue and EBITDA forecasts have been adjusted for co-investments. Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Broker reports, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Broker consensus estimate revenue will grow 18% in FY22 to $41.9m whilst the EBITDA margin over the same period is expected to increase from 64% to 71%.

Whilst broker consensus can provide a valuable datapoint, there are only two brokers following PWG. Neither of these brokers have issued reports in the last 2 months and specifically since the announcement of the Proposed Transaction.

PWG has recently released guidance that they expect FY21 earnings to be 5.8 cents[13] per security, which is underpinned by management’s forecast FY21 EBITDA of $25.5m (excluding co-investments and other income).

13 As announced on 19 April 2021 in the PWG ASX announcement in respect to the Proposed Transaction

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

26

88 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

4 Profile of CNI

Overview of CNI

CNI is an ASX-listed specialist investment manager with 600.2m stapled securities on issue and a market capitalisation of approximately $1.7bn based on the closing price of $2.77 per security as at 16 April 2021 (the day prior to the announcement of the Proposed Transaction). CNI specialises in the external management of property funds and investment bonds. CNI also holds strategic co-investments in the funds it manages, and recently acquired a 50% interest in Bass Capital, a real estate debt fund provider.

CNI’s stated vision is to build a leading listed external real estate funds management platform. CNI has a dual growth strategy underpinned by acquisition of direct real estate as well as corporate acquisitions.

Assets under management

As at 31 December 2020, CNI managed a combined $10.5bn in AUM, and held $0.7bn in coinvestments, as set out below.


investments, as set out below.

investments, as set out below.

investments, as set out below.

investments, as set out below.
Table 16: CNI AUM and co-investments as at 31 December 2020
Property Funds Management Investment bonds Co-Investments
Listedproperty Unlistedproperty
AUM $4.9bn $4.7bn $0.9bn $0.7bn
Composition • Centuria Office REIT: • Unlisted NZ single • Centuria Investment • Centuria Office REIT:
$2.0bn asset funds & Bonds $0.2bn3 (19.9%)
• Centuria Industrial
REIT: $2.6bn
Augusta Property
Fund: $1.5bn
• Guardian Friendly
Society
• Centuria Industrial
REIT: $0.3bn3
• Asset Plus Ltd: • NZ Industrial Fund: (15.1%)
$0.3bn1 $0.4bn • Asset Plus Ltd:
• Centuria Fixed term $0.02bn3 (19.99%)
funds:$1.7bn • Unlisted property
• Centuria Diversified and debt
Property Fund: investments: $0.1bn
$0.2bn • Properties held for
• Centuria Healthcare development:
Real Estate: $0.7bn2 $0.03bn
• Centuria Healthcare
Property Fund:
$0.2bn

Notes: 1. Includes 6-8 Munroe Lane, Auckland, Albany, New Zealand valuation on an “as if complete” basis

  1. Incudes commenced development projects on an “as if complete” basis

  2. Based on the close price as at 31 December 2020. Includes ownership by associates of CNI. Source: CNI 1HFY21 results presentation

CNI’s co-investments represent holdings in property assets managed by the group. Of the listed property assets, the value of the co-investments represents the value implied by closing share prices as at 31 December 2020. The value of unlisted property, and properties held for development are assessed by reference to external valuations.

CNI’s operating segments include:

  • Property Funds Management : management of listed and unlisted property funds and the completion of property developments

  • Investment Bonds Management : operating through Centuria Life, a friendly society that offers a range of retirement planning investment products. Centuria Life also manages the Over Fifty Guardian Friendly Society, which offers pre-paid funeral plans

  • Co-Investments : direct interests in property funds and other liquid investments

  • Corporate : overheads which support the operating segments of CNI and management of the reverse lending portfolio.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

27

Target’s Statement 89

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

CNI’s main non-operating segments include:

  • Benefits Funds : includes the results of the Benefit Funds of Centuria Life, which are required to be consolidated to comply with accounting standards

  • Controlled Property Funds : includes the results of property funds which are managed by the group and consolidated per accounting standards. The group’s principal activities do not include direct ownership of these funds for the purposes of control and deriving rental income, therefore the results are excluded from operating profit.

CNI’s Property Funds Management portfolio is geographically focused in Australia and New Zealand. It is primarily exposed to the office and industrial property subsectors, with most of its portfolio largely comprised of listed REITs and unlisted single asset funds.

Set out in the figures below is the split by geography, sector and fund type and capital source of CNI’s property funds management portfolio.

Figure 7: CNI property funds management AUM by geography as at 16 April 2021

Note:

  1. New Zealand dollar values converted to Australian dollars at an exchange rate of $/NZ$1.088. Sources: Bidder’s Statement, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Figure 8: CNI property funds management Figure 9: CNI property funds management fund sector exposure types

Notes:

  1. Other includes New Zealand large format retail, supermarkets, shopping centres and tourism

  2. Numbers may differ due to rounding.

  3. Sources: Bidder’s Statement, Deloitte Corporate Finance Analysis

The Augusta Capital acquisition (detailed in Section 4.2.2) shifted CNI’s geographical and sector exposures. It increased CNI’s exposure to the New Zealand market, as well as the sector exposure to the tourism and large format retail subsectors (included in the “other” categorisation in Figure 8 above).

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

28

90 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

4.2.2 AUM growth strategy

CNI’s dual growth strategy is based on acquisitions in direct real estate as well as corporate acquisitions. Since FY18 CNI’s property funds management and investment bonds AUM grew at a compound annual growth rate of 32%, largely driven by the acquisition of two external property fund managers and their accompanying AUM and various real estate assets, as set out below.

Figure 10: CNI AUM growth

Source: Bidder’s Statement

CNI’s AUM growth through business and larger real estate acquisitions are set out in the figure below.

Figure 11 CNI acquisition timeline

==> picture [86 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Source: ASX announcements
----- End of picture text -----

Heathley Limited – corporate acquisition

On 20 May 2019, CNI announced it would acquire a 50% voting interest and 63.1% economic interest in specialist healthcare property funds manager Heathley to form Centuria Heathley, for a total consideration of $24.4m.

Heathley is a specialist healthcare property fund manager with a portfolio of eight unlisted funds, consisting of 42 properties and AUM of $620m. The acquisition introduced CNI to the healthcare real estate sector. Based on a normalised FY18 EBIT of $3.2m the implied EBIT multiple for the transaction (adjusted for NTA) was 10.0x. CNI gained control of Centuria Heathley on 5 September 2019.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

29

Target’s Statement 91

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Augusta Capital – corporate acquisition

On 15 June 2020, CNI announced the acquisition of the remaining ordinary shares in the Augusta real estate platform for an implied offer value of NZ$133m.

Augusta was one of New Zealand’s largest listed real estate funds managers with NZ$1.8bn AUM across listed and unlisted real estate funds, 72.0% of AUM were made up of office and industrial assets. It was the fund manager of the Augusta Industrial Fund (NZ$347m AUM), Single assets Australia (NZ$175m AUM), Single assets New Zealand ($1.1bn AUM), Asset Plus (NZ$147m AUM) and held NZ$29m worth of properties on its balance sheet.

The offer consideration of NZ$0.22 plus 0.392 CNI securities per Augusta share implies an adjusted FY20 EBIT multiple of 10.6x. CNI achieved effective control on 30 June 2020 and reached the compulsory acquisition threshold in July 2020.

Securities in CNI

CNI is a stapled group comprising Centuria Capital Limited and Centuria Capital Fund and their controlled entities. Shares in Centuria Capital Limited and units in Centuria Capital Fund are stapled together to form a stapled security, such that both can only be purchased or sold together.

CNI has 600.2m stapled securities on issue. The substantial holders account for 31.7% of securities on issue.

Table 17: Substantial holders

Table 17: Substantial holders
Holder Securities held Ownership
(m) (%)
ESR Pte. Ltd 102.7 17.8%
Vanguard 48.9 8.2%
BlackRock, Inc 38.7 6.6%
Subtotal – Substantial holders 190.2 32.5%
Others 410.0 68.3%
Total securities 600.2 100.0%

Source: Bidder’s Statement

Of the issued securities, 72.8% is considered “free-float”[14] , with the balance comprised of certain nonsubstantial and substantial (i.e. ESR Pte. Ltd) executive or strategic corporate investors. CNI has 9.0m performance rights outstanding as at 16 April 2021.

Since January 2020, $200m has been raised in securities issuances by CNI. Key details of these issuances are set out below.

Table 18: CNI securities issuances

Table 18: CNI securities issuances
Securities Price per Amount raised on issue
Issuance date issued (m) security (m)
January 2020 34.2 $2.34 $80.0
3 November 2020 and 17 November 2020 53.3 $2.25 $120.0

Sources: ASX releases, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Due to strong demand from institutional investors, the January 2020 placement increased in size from $60m to $80m. $60m of the issuance was used as a source of funding for CNI’s takeover of Augusta, with the remaining $20m used to support growth in its listed and unlisted business.

The issuances in November 2020 was increased from $100m to $120m due to strong investor demand. The funds raised were used to support the working capital requirements of CNI, including underwriting the acquisition of the Visy facility in Auckland, New Zealand, transaction costs and debt repayment. The Visy investment forms part of a newly formed New Zealand single asset fund launched by Augusta Capital and underwritten by CNI. This issuance was comprised of a retail entitlement offer ($28.4m), an institutional placement ($39.5m) and an institutional entitlement offer ($52.1m).

14 S&P Capital IQ sourced on 6 May 2021

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

30

92 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

4.3.1 Liquidity analysis

Relative to larger fund management counterparts and diversified real estate groups, CNI’s securities traded at lower volumes, when measured by percentage of total securities traded. 293m securities traded (53% of total securities on issue on a weighted average basis) in on-market transactions during the 12 months prior to the announcement of the Proposed Transaction on 19 April 2021.

Table 19: Average volume traded in securities

Company 12 months 6 months 1 month 1 week After Proposed
Transaction
announcement
CNI 53.4% 21.0% 3.5% 0.9% 0.5%
PWG 11.9% 6.7% 1.8% 0.7% 0.8%
Listed companies
360 Capital 36.2% 16.7% 1.5% 0.3% 0.1%
APN Property 15.5% 6.8% 1.6% 0.4% 0.1%
Charter Hall 91.1% 35.9% 6.4% 1.3% 0.3%
Goodman 58.9% 25.3% 4.1% 1.0% 0.4%
Platinum 57.1% 25.1% 3.6% 0.9% 0.4%

Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

4.3.2 Trading in CNI securities

The security price of CNI has generally outperformed the broader Australian real estate market as depicted by the ASX 200 A-REIT index, over the past two years, with the exception of certain periods where the share price was impacted by announcements relating to earnings. During the period March to April 2020, CNI and the broader equity market experienced a steep decline as the market initially reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic. This is summarised in the figure and table below.

Figure 12: CNI security price performance

==> picture [366 x 191] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
3.0 25.0
2.8
2.6
2.4 20.0
2.2
2.0
1.8 15.0
1.6
1.4
1.2 10.0
1.0
0.8
0.6 5.0
0.4
0.2
0.0 0.0
CNI volume (RHS) CNI share price (LHS) S&P/ASX 200 (LHS)(rebased) ASX 200 A-REIT index (LHS)(rebased)
Sources: S&P Capital IQ, ASX announcements, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis
Volume (m)
Share price ($)
Jul 2019 Aug 2019 Sep 2019 Oct 2019 Nov 2019 Dec 2019 Jan 2020 Feb 2020 Mar 2020 Apr 2020 May 2020 Jun 2020 Jul 2020 Aug 2020 Sep 2020 Oct 2020 Nov 2020 Dec 2020 Jan 2021 Feb 2021 Mar 2021 Apr 2021
----- End of picture text -----

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

31

Target’s Statement

93

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Table 20: Key events and announcements

# Date Announcement
Announced a $100m equity raise at $2.10 per security to support co-investments in Centuria
1 Sep 19 Metropolitan REIT to fund its acquisition of office properties valued at $381m and increase working
capital to support capital management initiatives
2 Sep19 CNI was included into the S&P/ASX 300 index
Centuria Industrial REIT acquired two industrial property assets which are 100% leased to Arnott’s
3 Dec 19 Biscuits. In addition, Centuria Metropolitan REIT acquired the Nishi building in Canberra. The
transactions increased CNI’s AUM by $492m
4 Jan 20 CNI issued a takeover offer to acquire Augusta Capital for NZ$180m
5 Feb 20 CNI released 1HY20 results, delivering operating NPAT of 8.1 cents per security, representing a
1.6c increase on theprior corresponding period
6 Mar 20 On marketpurchase byESR Pte. Ltd
CNI management revised its FY20 operating NPAT down to 11.5 cents per security, from 12.5 cents
7 Mar 20 per security, in response to emerging uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic. CNI also
terminated its bid for Augusta Capital
8 Jun 20 CNI issued a revised takeover offer to acquire Augusta Capital for NZ$ 133m, for the 76.7%
interest that theydid not alreadyown
9 Aug 20 CNI announced an operating NPAT of 12.0 cents per security, ahead of their market guidance of
11.5 cents per security
10 Aug 20 CNI announced the launch of an unlisted open-ended healthcare fund worth $133m with a starting
distributionyield of 5.75%
11 Nov 20 On marketpurchase byBlackrock,Inc
CNI announced 1HFY21 financial results. Operating EPS decreased from 8.1 cents per security to
12 Feb 21 6.5 cents per security, largely driven by lower acquisition and performance fees relative to the prior
corresponding period
13 Mar 21 CNI announced the completion of the NZ$ 178m acquisition of Visy Glass Plant in New Zealand
through a newlycreated single asset fund managed byAugusta Capital
14 Apr 21 Proposed Transaction is announced
15 Apr 21 CNI acquired a 50% interest in Bass Capital,aprovider of real estate debt financingfor$24m.
Sources: ASX announcements, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

The volume weighted average prices based on the trading in CNI securities over the 12 months leading up to the Proposed Transaction are set out in the figure below.

Table 21: Volume weighted average price analysis

Table 21: Volume weighted average price analysis
$ VWAP
12 months 2.12
6 months 2.45
1 month 2.58
1 week 2.70
Closepriceprior to the announcement of the Proposed Transaction1 2.77
Note:
1.
As at 16 April 2021.
Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

32

94 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

CNI broker coverage

CNI is covered by six equity research brokerage houses, between them, issuing 22 broker reports since July 2020. The brokers assess the value of CNI based on a range of approaches, including fundamental discounted cash flow analysis and sum-of-the parts based on market multiples or net asset value approaches.

As at 30 April 2021 target broker prices ranged from $2.49 to $3.00 per security, with an average of $2.78 per security. This compares to the last sale as at 30 April 2021 of $2.67.

The figure below shows the target CNI security price as estimated by equity research brokers since July 2020.

Figure 13: CNI broker target security price

==> picture [339 x 155] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

3.50
3.25
3.00
2.75
2.50
2.25
2.00
1.75
1.50
CNI share price Broker 1 Broker 2 Broker 3
Broker 4 Broker 5 Broker 6
$
Jul 2020 Aug 2020 Sep 2020 Oct 2020 Nov 2020 Dec 2020 Jan 2021 Feb 2021 Mar 2021 Apr 2021
----- End of picture text -----

Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Broker reports, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

33

Target’s Statement

95

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Financial performance

Set out in the table below is the operating segment (as described in Section 4.2) financial performance for the years ended 30 June 2019, 30 June 2020 and the half year ended 31 December 2020.

Table 22: CNI operating segment financial performance

Audited Audited Reviewed
$m (unless otherwise stated) FY19 FY20 1HY21
Management fees 49.7 63.1 38.3
Acquisition fees 1.1 6.9 4.8
Performance fees 22.5 21.5 13.6
Other income 3.1 5.8 2.2
Total operating revenue 76.4 97.3 58.9
Expenses (38.2) (51.1) (31.4)
Development profit 0.7 1.8 2.7
Operating segment EBITDA 38.9 47.9 30.2
Co-investments EBITDA 28.2 31.7 17.3
Depreciation (0.5) (2.9) (2.0)
Net finance costs (11.6) (10.8) (5.8)
Tax (9.4) (12.6) (5.7)
Operating NPAT 45.7 53.3 34.0
AUM (end of period) ($bn) 6.2 8.8 10.2
Revenue growth (%) (1%) 27% 21%1
EBITDA margin2 (%) 50% 47% 47%
Operating EPS (cents) 12.7 12.0 6.2

Notes:

  1. Annualised

  2. Excluding development profit.

Sources: FY20 and 1HFY21 financial report, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Revenue in FY20 increased largely due to the increase in AUM, on the back of significant acquisitions including the Nishi building acquired by the Centuria Office REIT and two Arnott’s assets acquired by the Centuria Industrial Fund, with AUM across these two acquisitions totalling $492m. Furthermore, FY20 represents the first full year of earnings contributions following the settlement of the Heathley acquisition in September 2019.

The annualised growth in 1HY21 is largely driven by the acquisition of Augusta Capital, whereby control was gained by CNI on 30 June 2020. As such the financial performance of the business has only been fully consolidated in CNI’s financials in the 1HY21 results.

Performance fees are earned for providing management services where a property fund outperforms a set IRR benchmark at the time that the property is sold. Performance fees are recognised over time when they are deemed highly probable and the amount of performance fees will not result in a significant reversal in future periods.

Development revenue reflects the contractual arrangements to manage development projects. CNI owns development properties in Auckland, Queenstown and Gosford, and also manages development projects on behalf of the funds/trusts managed by CNI. Development revenue is recognised over time based on the satisfaction of performance obligations.

EBITDA margins decreased across the periods, largely driven by the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on investment markets, impacting the AUM of the Benefit Funds, and therefore impacting the management fees received.

CNI’s operating financial performance (as presented above), excludes the results from the consolidated Benefits Funds and Controlled Property Funds, and excludes:

  • gains and losses on properties and investments arising from the mark-to-market recognition of property and other assets at fair value.

  • corporate restructure and transaction costs largely relate to the costs associated with the acquisition and integration of Heathley and Augusta Capital.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

34

96 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Financial position

The following table sets out CNI’s financial position as at 30 June 2019, 30 June 2020 and 31 December 2020.

Table 23: CNI financial position

Table 23: CNI financial position
$m (unless stated otherwise) Audited Audited Reviewed
**FY191 ** FY20 1HY21
Receivables 49.7 65.5 116.3
Payables (35.7) (70.7) (50.8)
Net working capital 14.1 (5.1) 65.5
Intangible assets 157.7 280.1 281.0
Provisions (1.9) (2.2) (3.0)
Other funds employed 0.1 15.9 9.2
Funds employed 155.9 293.8 287.1
Financial assets 112.3 523.1 584.8
Equityaccounted investments 360.4 33.0 33.4
Other assets 16.0 32.2 36.7
Co-investments & other 488.7 588.2 654.9
Cash and cash equivalents 87.8 149.5 168.0
Borrowings (210.8) (180.3) (194.5)
Lease liability - (22.6) (21.7)
Interest rate swaps at fair value (28.1) (32.8) (33.9)
Net debt (151.1) (86.2) (82.2)
Net operating assets 507.5 790.7 925.3
Non-operatingnet assets 43.9 40.5 39.5
Total net assets 551.4 831.1 964.8
Non-controllinginterests (46.2) (98.0) (41.0)
Net assets attributable to CNI securityholders 505.2 733.1 923.8
Securities outstanding (m) 383.6 510.0 600.2
Net assetsper security $1.32 $1.44 $1.54
Net tangible assets 347.5 453.0 642.9
NTAper security ($) $0.91 $0.89 $1.07

Sources: CNI FY20 financial report, CNI 1HY21 financial report, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Net working capital increased in 1HY21, primarily driven by increases in accrued performance fees and an increase in contract assets (unbilled receivables) on development contracts.

Intangible assets comprise goodwill arising from business acquisitions ($281.0m as at 1HY21), including 360 Capital ($12.5m in FY17), Augusta Capital ($68.3m in FY19) and Heathley ($34.0m in 1HY19) and indefinite life management rights ($112.2m).

During 1HY21, CNI issued 24.8m securities in relation to the Augusta Capital acquisition, in addition to 53.3m securities in relation to the $120m equity raising at a price of $2.25 completed in November 2020.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

35

Target’s Statement 97

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Financial assets represents CNI’s investments in trusts, shares and other financial instruments, where CNI is below the significant influence threshold of 20%, and include:

  • investment in Centuria Industrial REIT

  • Centuria Office REIT

  • Asset Plus

  • investments in trusts, shares and other financial instruments

  • reverse mortgage and other loans receivable.

Listed investments are valued by reference to securities prices, whereas unlisted investments are assessed by reference to external property valuations.

The significant increase in financial assets in FY20 relates to the reclassification of CNI’s interest in the Centuria Office REIT and Centuria Industrial REIT from equity accounted investments to financial assets when CNI’s interest reduced below the significant influence threshold.

Equity accounted investments relate to property fund investments where CNI holds an interest of between 20% and 50% of issued capital, including 25% in QT Lakeview Developments and 24% in Centuria Diversified Property Fund as at 31 December 2021.

Net debt decreased in FY20 on account of the proceeds of security issuances being used to pay down debt facilities and top up cash reserves. CNI adopted AASB 16 Leases from FY20, and did not recognise lease liabilities (or right-of-use assets) prior to this period.

Non-operating net assets relates to the Benefits Funds and Controlled Property Funds operating segments, and elimination adjustments.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

36

98 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

5 Profile of the Proposed Merged Entity

If the Proposed Transaction proceeds, PWG securityholders will collectively own 23.8% of the securities outstanding in the PME. The PME will comprise of the operations and co-investments of PWG and CNI, and any synergies achieved.

Assets under management

On a pro forma basis, the PME will manage a combined $15.5bn in AUM, and hold $1.0bn in coinvestments, as set out below.

Table 24: PME AUM and co-investments as at 16 April 2021[1,2]

  • Property Funds Management Investment bonds Co-Investments

  • Listed property Unlisted property

  • AUM $5.2bn $9.4bn $0.9bn $1.0bn Composition • Centuria Office REIT • Unlisted NZ single • Centuria Investment • Centuria Office REIT • Centuria Industrial asset funds & Bonds • Centuria Industrial REIT Augusta Property • Guardian Friendly REIT Fund Society

    • Centuria Office REIT
  • Asset Plus Ltd

    • Asset Plus Ltd
  • NZ Industrial Fund Centuria Fixed term • Unlisted property funds and debt investments

  • VTH

  • Centuria Diversified Property Fund • Properties held for development

  • Centuria Healthcare Real Estate • VTH

  • PWG unlisted funds

  • Centuria Healthcare Property Fund

  • PWG unlisted funds

  • PWG mandates

  • PWG Bespoke

Notes:

  1. The green boxes denote AUM and co-investments contributed by PWG 2. Pro forma AUM numbers are based on 31 December 2020 figures, adjusted for post balance date revaluations and acquisitions.

Source: Bidder’s Statement

Following the Proposed Transaction, PWG securityholders will be exposed to a significantly larger portfolio, from $5.0bn in AUM in PWG to a share in $15.5bn in the PME. Furthermore, the sector, fund type and capital sources that PWG Securityholders will be exposed to will change substantially under ownership in the PME, as set out in the figures below.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

37

Target’s Statement 99

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Figure 14: PME AUM by geography

Note:

  1. Other includes two properties located in the USA (c. $98m) and two indirect holdings with no geographic location Sources: Bidder’s Statement, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Figure 15: Sector exposure ($bn) Note:

==> picture [110 x 7] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figure 16: Fund types ($bn)
----- End of picture text -----

  1. Comprises NZ supermarkets and shopping centres plus hotel and land syndicates in the USA and WA. Sources: Target’s Statement, Bidder’s Statement, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

As set out in the figures above, and when compared with Figure 1 to Figure 3 from Section 3.2, PWG securityholders will expand their portfolio to the New Zealand market in addition to a re-weighting of the portfolio away from Western Australia, and toward the Eastern seaboard of Australia. Western Australia represents 54% of AUM in the PWG portfolio, however, this will decrease to 23% in the PME.

Under the PME, there will be a new exposure to the health care sector and an increase in exposure to the office and industrial sectors. Weighting to the agriculture, daily needs retail and large format retail will reduce in the PME as CNI manages little to no funds in these sectors.

The heavy weighting towards unlisted funds in PWG will be re-balanced towards a more diversified mix of listed and unlisted fund types and capital sources in the PME.

Management team

CNI intends to integrate the PWG management team into CNI’s operations. The Founding Directors will continue to lead the PWG funds management platform and will also join the CNI executive management team. Each of the Founding Directors has agreed to remain as a senior executive for a period of at least two years.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

38

100 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Synergies

The PME is expected to realise synergies on integration of the PWG and CNI businesses, including:

  • supporting the growth of AUM across the two platforms

  • expansion of property services across the two businesses

  • removal of duplicated corporate costs, specifically, audit and tax consulting fees, ASX listing costs, Directors’ fees, marketing and investor relations costs

  • tax related synergies concerning the structuring of the Proposed Transaction, resulting in a crossstaple loan which provides a tax shield.

Management of PWG and CNI expect to realise post-tax synergies of $5.3m p.a.

Securities in PME

Securities in the PME will be comprised of the securities on issue in CNI prior to the Proposed Transaction plus securities issued to PWG securityholders as part of the Consideration, as set out in the table below.

Table 25: Pro forma securities in the PME

Table 25: Pro forma securities in the PME
Number of % in
securities (m) PME
CNI securitiesprior to the Proposed Transaction 600.2 76.2%
Securities issued aspart of the Consideration 187.61 23.8%
Pro forma securities in the PME 787.8 100.0%
Note:
  1. Represents 0.473 securities for each of the 397m PWG securities. Sources: CNI Financial Report FY20, CNI investor presentation on the Proposed Transaction

PWG securityholders are expected to comprise 23.8% of the total issued capital of the PME following the Proposed Transaction. 12.7% of the securities of PME will be held by the Founding Directors. The holdings of the Founding Directors will be subject to a two-year escrow.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

39

Target’s Statement 101

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Pro forma financials

Set out below is the pro forma income statement of the PME for the 12 months ended 30 June 2021. Table 26: FY21 pro forma income statement

Table 26: FY21 pro forma income statement
$m
CNI
PWG
Merger
adjustments
PME
Management fees
74.7
29.3
1.0
105.0
Acquisition fees
12.9
9.2
-
22.1
Performance fees
18.7
-
-
18.7
Distribution/dividend revenue
34.7
2.0
-
36.7
Revenue
140.9
40.5
1.0
182.4
Expenses
(66.8)
(13.0)
0.7
(79.0)
EBIT
74.1
27.5
1.7
103.4
Development EBIT
7.0
-
-
7.0
Interest income / (expense)
(2.5)
0.1
-
(2.3)
Tax
(9.6)
(6.4)
3.6
(12.4)
NPAT
69.1
21.3
5.3
95.7
Weighted securities on issue
574.3
368.5
187.6
761.8
EPS (cents)
12.0
5.8
-
12.6
Analysisper PWG security
Earnings per PWG security
5.8
PWG accretion/dilution
6.81
18.7%

Note:

  1. Notional earnings per PWG security, using a conversion ratio of 0.473 CNI securities per PWG security, and assuming that the $0.20 cash component of the Consideration is reinvested at CNI’s closing price of $2.77 on 16 April 2021. Sources: Target’s Statement, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

The pro forma income statement represents CNI and PWG management’s projections for their respective businesses for FY21, adjusted for certain pro forma merger adjustments including:

  • synergies as discussed in Section 5.3 above

  • the additional CNI securities to be issued as part of the scrip Consideration, calculated as 0.473 CNI securities issued for each of the 397m PWG securities outstanding.

Assuming reinvestment of the cash component of the Consideration, the analysis above suggests that PWG securityholders would recognise earnings accretion of 18.7% under the PME.

For further details behind the pro forma income statement adjustments, refer to Section 9.3.7 of the Bidder’s Statement.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

40

102 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Table 27: Pro forma operating balance sheet

Table 27: Pro forma operating balance sheet
CNI
PWG
Merger
$m
Pro forma
Pro forma
adjustments
PME
Pro forma
Cash and cash equivalents
206
66
(89)
184
Receivables
110
2
-
112
Financial assets
609
35
-
644
Assets held for sale
-
46
-
46
Property held for development
52
-
-
52
Equity accounted investments
33
-
-
33
Intangible assets
305
120
332
757
Other assets
68
3
-
71
Total assets
1,383
273
243
1,899
Payables
(24)
(1)
-
(25)
Borrowings
(313)
-
-
(313)
Other liabilities
(121)
(5)
-
(126)
Total liabilities
(458)
(6)
-
(464)
Net assets
925
267
243
1,435
Securities outstanding (m)
600
397
188
788
Net asset value per security ($)
1.54
0.67
NTA per security ($)
1.03
0.37
Operating gearing ratio (%)1
9.1%
-
1.82
0.86
7.6%

Note:

  1. Gearing is calculated based on borrowings less cash, divided by total assets (excluding cash). Sources: Bidder’s Statement, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

The CNI and PWG operating balance sheets reflect 31 December 2020 balance sheets modified for certain pro forma adjustments to reflect the payment of the 1HFY21 distributions, issuance of listed notes or equity and acquisition of co-investment stakes. For further details behind the pro forma adjustments, refer to the Target’s Statement.

Merger adjustments reflect a decrease in cash to fund the cash component of the Consideration (of $0.20 per PWG security), incremental intangible assets associated with the expected acquisition of PWG, and the issuance of an additional 188m securities to PWG securityholders.

As a result of the Proposed Transaction, the net asset per security for PWG securityholders will increase from $0.67 per security to $1.82 per security. However, a large portion of the increase relates to goodwill recognised as a result of the Proposed Transaction. Excluding intangible assets, NTA per security attributable to PWG securityholders would increase from $0.37 per security to $0.86 per security in the PME.

The gearing of the PME will reflect the combined net debt of CNI (9.0%), PWG (0%) and the cash outflow used to fund the cash component of the Consideration paid by CNI to PWG securityholders as part of the Proposed Transaction.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

41

Target’s Statement 103

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

6 Valuation of PWG

Selection of valuation methodology

For the purposes of assessing the market value of a PWG security, we have defined market value as the amount at which the securities in PWG would be expected to change hands in a hypothetical transaction between a knowledgeable willing, but not anxious, buyer and a knowledgeable willing, but not anxious, seller acting at arm’s length.

Special purchasers may be willing to pay higher prices to reduce or eliminate competition, to ensure a source of material supply or sales, or to achieve cost savings or other synergies arising on business combinations, which could only be enjoyed by the special purchaser. Our valuation has not been premised on the existence of a special purchaser.

In selecting an appropriate methodology to estimate the market value of a PWG security, we have considered common market practice and the valuation methodologies recommended by RG 111. Further information on the methodologies is set out at Appendix 2. In estimating the market value of a PWG security, we have used a sum of the parts approach. In this regard, we have:

  • assessed the enterprise value of PWG’s core operations using the market multiples method under the market approach as our primary methodology. This method involves applying a multiple to an estimate of maintainable earnings. In this regard, we note:

  • earnings are expected to be relatively stable for PWG, albeit reflective of underlying growth expectations, given they are based on fixed fee rates and (indirectly) the value of the underlying properties under management

  • there are an adequate number of publicly listed companies and transactions involving companies with operations sufficiently comparable to PWG from which a meaningful comparison can be undertaken and an appropriate multiple can be derived. We determined the multiple based on earnings and enterprise values which exclude coinvestments on the basis that such assets can differ significantly between businesses and transactions

  • such an approach is commonly used to value funds management businesses such as PWG

  • valued the co-investments currently held by PWG based on their assessed market value

  • valued the VTH co-investment/non-operating assets held by PWG based on the realisable value of the investment

  • incorporated the estimated net cash position of PWG as at 30 June 2021, as a proxy for the estimated cash upon completion of the Proposed Transaction.

We also cross-checked our estimate of the enterprise value of PWG using the percentage of AUM method, based on the AUM multiples observed in comparable listed companies and transactions in the funds management sector, and a high level capitalisation of earnings method (which is a method under the income approach and is akin to the discounted cash flow method).

We note based on our experience as indicated through other independent expert reports, it is common in the industry to value entities such as PWG using the market multiples methodology. In addition, we consider it appropriate to use this approach despite the fact that a large proportion of the funds managed by PWG are subject to agreements with discrete time periods, as PWG and executives of PWG have a track record of growing AUM and establishing new funds (which is also their intention).

We do not consider the cost approach appropriate as such a methodology ignores the value of intangible assets held by PWG such as its management agreements.

Application of the market multiples methodology

The market multiples method estimates the enterprise value of PWG by applying a multiple to the future maintainable earnings of the entity. In applying the market multiples approach, we have considered the following:

  • the level of earnings that the existing operations could reasonably be expected to generate. We have selected EBITDA as an appropriate measure of earnings because earnings multiples based on EBITDA are less sensitive to different financing structures, depreciation and amortisation accounting policies and effective tax rates than multiples based on EBIT or NPAT. This allows a better comparison with the earnings multiples of other companies. For these types of businesses

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

42

104 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

however, EBITDA and EBIT are not generally dissimilar due to low levels of depreciation and amortisation

  • the enterprise value per dollar of EBITDA (EBITDA multiple) observed from recent transactions involving companies comparable to PWG and the trading multiples of listed companies comparable to PWG. Given we are assessing the multiple exclusive of co-investments, we have adjusted the enterprise values of these comparable listed companies and transactions by deducting their co-investments as well as adjusted earnings for any income generated by the coinvestments.

  • 6.2.1 Future earnings

Future earnings represent the level of earnings that the existing operations of PWG could reasonably be expected to generate. In determining our assessed EBITDA range, we had regard to the pro forma financial statements of PWG, as discussed above in Section 5.5.

  • We have considered the following in selecting the maintainable EBITDA range attributable to PWG: • asset management, project services, transaction and performance fees adopted in the pro forma financial statements disclosed in the Bidder’s Statement to ensure they reflect a reasonable estimate of maintainable level of the operations of PWG

  • • whilst we considered historical earnings of PWG, we have not placed substantial weight on them because of the significant underlying growth that has been achieved in recent years

  • • the expectation that PWG will shortly commence collecting fees on recently completed acquisitions, recently completed developments as well as recommence collecting fees on two properties that previously had fees suspended for commercial reasons

  • • Management’s current expectation of potential performance fees over the next ten years. More specifically, we note the following: o performance fees are agreed with the individual fund and can either be tied to the sale of the property or agreed performance hurdles. Having regard to the best interests of fund investors, PWG’s general strategy is to continue to earn fees from managing properties, rather than realising performance fees through disposals of properties, at which point all the other fees generated by PWG from that fund would cease. Consequently, we have only considered performance fees whereby the fee would be payable as a result of a hurdle (and subject to that hurdle being achieved)

  • o performance fee profile is difficult to project given it can change significantly based on future property valuations. PWG generated performance fees of $5.6m in FY20, however did not receive any in FY19

  • o Management has estimated future potential performance fees over the next ten years based on current independent property valuations and current internal rates of return. Given the recent compression in property capitalisation rates, the current forecast of performance fees could be viewed as conservative. On the other hand, the level of anticipated performance fees over the next ten year period is uncertain and dependent upon the future returns of the funds driven by underlying valuations. Due to this inherent uncertainty in realising performance fees, we have selected a range to reflect the potential earnings from performance fees

  • o the performance fee profile should be considered in the maintainable EBITDA as it is a significant potential revenue stream for PWG. In this regard, performance fees have been included in our analysis of selected comparable companies and transactions, where applicable

  • • transaction fees relate to the value of property acquisitions facilitated in the financial year, which makes them difficult to forecast as the value and number of completed acquisitions may differ year on year. Transaction fees in FY20 totalled $5.5m, whilst Management expects the FY21 figure to be $9.2m. We have adjusted the transactions fees having regard to the historical fees generated as well as the anticipated level of acquisitions going forward as Management expects the growth in AUM to continue

  • cost savings that could be realised by a number of market participants such as listing, audit and directors fees

  • the loss of revenues from the cessation of the VTH management rights.

Based on the above, we have selected a maintainable EBITDA range of $29.0m to $30.0m as summarised in the below table.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

43

Target’s Statement 105

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Table 28: Maintainable EBITDA

Table 28: Maintainable EBITDA
$m Low High
FY21 pro forma EBITDA 27.7 27.7
Co-investment/other income (2.1) (2.1)
FY21 EBITDA from fund management activities 25.5 25.5
Asset management fee adjustment 2.9 2.9
Performance fee adjustment 2.0 3.0
Transaction fee adjustment (1.2) (1.2)
General corporate cost savings 0.7 0.7
Reduction in earnings associated with management of
VTH
(0.5) (0.5)
Maintainable EBITDA 29.4 30.4
Selected maintainable EBITDA 29.0 30.0
Sources: Management, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

This level of EBITDA implies an average EBITDA margin of approximately 71%, which is broadly in line with PWG’s FY20 EBITDA margin of 68% (after adjusting for one-off listing costs).

6.2.2 EBITDA multiple selection

In selecting an appropriate earnings multiple, we have considered multiples observed from share market trading of listed companies with operations comparable to PWG and the implied multiples paid to acquire companies with operations comparable to PWG.

Earnings multiples derived from share market trading may not reflect the market value for control of a company as they are based on portfolio holdings in the subject companies. The difference between the market value of a controlling interest and a minority interest is referred to as the premium for control.

The owner of a controlling interest has the ability to do many things that the owner of a minority interest does not, enabling the owner to extract greater value for its interest. These include:

  • control the cash flows of the company, such as dividends, capital expenditure and compensation for directors and managers

  • determine and change the strategy and policies of the company

  • attempt to extract synergies via acquisitions, restructure the business or divest operations

  • control the composition of the board of directors.

Whilst Australian studies indicate control premiums tend to fall in a range between 20% and 40% of the portfolio holding values, the premium actually implied in a particular transaction involving a listed company is ultimately dependent on a variety of factors specific to the particular entity and the transaction.

In comparison, the acquisition price achieved in mergers or acquisitions of companies (particularly where control is transferred) represents the market value of a controlling interest in that company.

The criteria against which we have selected comparable listed companies and transactions are as follows:

  • comparable listed companies whose primary operations involve the provision of fund management services across both real estate and equity investments

  • in the case of comparable transactions, we have sought to identify those transactions relating to an internalisation or sale of management rights in the property sector, including real estate funds management businesses.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

44

106 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Comparable listed companies

Outlined in the following table are the implied EBITDA multiples and relevant metrics of the comparable listed companies.

Table 29: Comparable listed companies summary

Current LTM Current
EV1 EBITDA AUM EBITDA3 EBITDA
Company name ($m) Margin4,5 ($m) / AUM multiple4,5 EV / AUM
CNI 1,0222 38%2 10,200 0.4%2 17.3x2 10.0%2
Real estate entities with fund management operations
Charter Hall 6,609 74% 46,400 n/a 19.2x n/a
APN Property 284 53% 2,900 n/a 20.0x n/a
Equity fund managers
Platinum 2,4452 73%2 23,598 0.8%2 12.6x2 10.4%2
Perpetual 1,9912 32%2 89,200 0.2%2 10.1x2 2.2%2
Pendal 1,7712 37%2 101,700 0.2%2 9.0x2 1.7%2
Australian Ethical 9592 n/a 5,046 0.3%2 n/a 19.0%2

Notes:

  1. Market capitalisation as at 11 May 2021, with the exception of CNI which is as at 16 April 2021 (being the last trading day before the transaction was announced)

  2. EV has been adjusted to exclude co-investments. The adjusted enterprise value is used to calculate EBITDA and AUM multiples

  3. For the 12 months to 31 December 2020, with the exception of Pendal which is 30 September 2020

  4. Financial year ended 30 June 2021, with the exception of Pendal which is 30 September 2021

  5. Current and Forward EBITDA multiples are based on broker projections, adjusted to exclude co-investment income in CNI and PWG.

Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

We note the following in respect of the comparable listed companies summarised above and detailed in Appendix 3:

  • we do not consider the real estate entities with fund management operations provide good evidence of an appropriate multiple for a stand-alone funds management business, such as PWG, due to the following:

  • the smaller (APN Property Group), or significantly larger scale (Charter Hall), of the real estate entities, in comparison to PWG, in terms of both market capitalisation and AUM

  • more diversified earning streams in comparison to PWG, including significant coinvestments and development income

  • larger proportion of co-investments, in comparison to market capitalisation, relative to PWG

  • the market’s tendency to focus on the two points above when assessing the risk and return profile of the entities and consequently pricing their securities

  • inability to identify, accurately, current stand-alone earnings (revenue and expenses) directly attributable to funds management operations from financial statements or broker consensus.

Specific to the two entities in the table above, we also note:

  • APN Property Group is one of the smaller real estate fund managers identified and whilst its operations are aligned to PWG, it has limited liquidity and substantial co-investments (NTA represents approximately 47% of its current market capitalisation). It is currently trading on a current EBITDA multiple of 20.0x which reflects the influence of a takeover offer from Dexus. Prior to the announcement of the takeover offer, APN Property Group was trading at a current EBITDA multiple of 13.3x

  • Charter Hall is less impacted by the factors noted above as it derives approximately 70% of total revenue from its funds management operations, although it is significantly larger than PWG (market capitalisation of $6.6bn). Charter Hall’s current EBITDA multiple is 19.2x, however, similar to the other real estate entities this also includes their property

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

45

Target’s Statement 107

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

investment and development operations (NTA represents approximately 32% of its current market capitalisation)

  • we also considered the comparability of equities fund managers in our selection of an appropriate multiple for PWG. The earnings, and therefore multiples implied by the trading in securities of equities fund managers, are less affected by co-investments than the real estate entities. As such we consider equities fund managers provide a more directly comparable reference point to value PWG in comparison to the majority of the real estate entities. However, the implied valuation multiples of the equities funds managers can only form a starting point and appropriate adjustment needs to be made to recognise differences between equities funds management markets and property funds management markets, including factors such as associated fee structures and returns vs real estate fund investments. The average and median current EBITDA multiples for the comparable equities funds management companies are 10.5x and 10.2x, respectively. In calculating these multiples, for comparability we have removed the impact of coinvestment (where disclosures have allowed us to do this with reasonable accuracy).

More specifically, we note the following:

  • all the comparable equities funds management companies are larger than PWG in terms of AUM and therefore revenue. In addition, several of the equity funds management companies derive management fees from a variety of asset classes, including equities, fixed income, cash and other diversified assets across a number of different funds. This can create challenges because of differences in fee structures and client base

  • whilst Australian Ethical’s current EBITDA multiple is not available (due to the lack of equity research analyst coverage), the group achieved substantial growth in the last year which is providing scale economies and greater growth in earnings. As such, it’s EV / AUM percentage is very high

  • the multiple for Perpetual is at the low end of the range reflecting, in our opinion, their exposure to the financial planning sector, which has been adversely impacted by the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry

  • PWG’s current EBITDA margin of 64% is significantly higher than that of the funds management companies which average 47%. This would partially explain why PWG trades on a much higher multiple (notwithstanding the illiquidity in PWG securities)

  • in our opinion, CNI could be considered operationally most comparable to PWG, being largely a real estate funds manager focused on the Australian and New Zealand property sectors. However, CNI is significantly larger than PWG, with approximately double the AUM, and is more geographically diversified with operations in New Zealand in addition to Australia. PWG’s operations are significantly more concentrated in the Western Australia market (54% of PWG’s AUM are located in Western Australia), however, it has a broader range of sector exposure. Additionally, we note that PWG is heavily reliant on its Founding Directors and current management team to source and acquire new properties for its funds through their personal relationships as well as having significant interests in the underlying funds through family and associates

  • whilst CNI’s EBITDA margin is significantly lower than that of PWG, it reflects lower margin activities such as development operations and investment bonds management. CNI’s EBITDA margin related to its funds management business is more aligned to that of PWG

  • PWG and CNI’s LTM EBITDA per AUM percentage of 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively, are higher than the median of the equities funds management companies. This means that for every dollar of AUM that PWG and CNI manage they are able to generate a greater level of earnings compared to their peers and thus, all things being equal, should command a higher multiple

  • before the announcement of the Proposed Transaction, CNI traded at multiple of 17.3x current EBITDA and a percentage of AUM of 10.0%.

Recent transactions

We considered the comparable transactions outlined in Appendix 4. These transaction values were also adjusted to remove the impact of co-investments (where specifically disclosed) to ensure our evaluation of each transaction is aligned with our assessment of the Proposed Transaction.

All the comparable transactions relate to the acquisition of a controlling interest in a funds management business largely focused on the property sector.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

46

108 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

There is limited publicly available data in relation to the EBITDA (compared to EBIT) for these transactions and therefore we placed greater reliance on the EBIT multiples for the comparable transactions. Whilst EBIT multiples are generally higher than EBITDA multiples, it is uncommon for funds managers to have high levels of depreciation and amortisation and therefore EBIT and EBITDA multiples tend to be similar.

Of the comparable transactions included in Appendix 4, we consider the transactions set out in the table below to be most comparable given the focus of the target company on managing office and industrial property portfolios.

Table 30: Selected comparable transactions

Consideration Implied Implied
paid1 AUM EBIT(DA) EBIT % of
Date Target ($m) ($m) /AUM multiple AUM
Post-COVID 19 pandemic declaration
Mar-21 Precinct Properties New Zealand 197 3,203 0.4% 14.7x 6.1%
Oct-20 Investec Australia Property Fund 40 1,385 0.3% 9.1x 2.9%
Jun-20 GoFARM Asset Management 10 283 n/a n/a 3.5%
Jun-20 Augusta Capital Limited 49 1,723 0.6% 5.0x 2.8%
Pre-COVID 19 pandemic declaration
Sep-19 Garda Capital Group 31 404 0.8% 9.1x 7.6%
May-19 Heathley Limited 39 620 0.8% 12.1x2 6.2%
Aug-18 Folkestone 56 1,609 0.5% 7.7x 3.5%
Nov-16 360 Capital listed property platform 102 1,395 0.7% 11.2x 7.3%
Jul-16 GPT Management 9 439 0.3% 6.9x 2.0%
Mar-16 Investa Office Management 90 8,500 0.1% 9.4x 1.1%
Platform

Notes:

  1. Consideration paid is on a 100% interest acquisition basis and excludes any amounts paid for co-investments at the completion of the transaction. This adjusted consideration is used to calculate EBIT and AUM multiples

  2. Adjusted to include NTA.

Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

With respect to the above transactions, we note the following:

  • in March 2021, Precinct Properties New Zealand Limited announced it reached an agreement with the Manager, AMP Haumi Management Limited, to internalise management. Consideration of NZ$ 215m ($197m) was paid for the termination of the Management Services Agreement with AMP and the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities. Based on a normalised EBIT of $13.4m, the fund management rights were valued at 14.7x EBIT

  • in October 2020, Investec Property Limited, as responsible entity of Investec Australia Property Fund, announced that it had entered an implementation deed with Investec Group in relation to internalisation of the fund’s management rights for consideration of $40m

  • in June 2020, PWG acquired GoFARM Asset Management Pty Ltd, the manager of VTH for $10m. VTH is a listed real estate investment trust providing investors with exposure to real agricultural property assets. At the time of the acquisition, VTH held approximately $283m in assets.

  • in June 2020, CNI acquired Augusta Capital, one of New Zealand’s largest listed real estate funds management companies, with investments in office and industrial property located primarily in Auckland. We referred to an adjusted FY20 EBIT (having regard to historical performance) to calculate the multiple given the negative EBIT incurred for the year, because no deal fee income was generated (as compared to prior periods when deal fees where generated)

  • in September 2019, Garda internalised its management by acquiring Garda Capital Group, for total consideration of $62m, with $32.4m attributed to the management platform. Garda Capital Group’s responsibilities as manager included both management of 14 established properties and development activity in respect of 4 locations, diversified across commercial and industrial sites. The underlying funds management business – outside of some one-off fees that were expected to be generated in the following year – was valued by the independent expert or the transaction on a multiple of 8x to 9x EBIT. The funds management platform of Garda was small with less than $500m of funds under management and it was also much less diversified

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

47

Target’s Statement 109

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

  • in May 2019, CNI acquired a 63.1% economic interest in Heathley Limited for $24.4m. Heathley Limited is a specialist healthcare funds manager that had $620m AUM in healthcare assets at the time of the transaction, including medical centres, day hospital and tertiary aged care. Based on a normalised EBIT of $3.2m, Heathley Limited was valued at 12.1x EBIT including NTA of $6.9m

  • in August 2018, Charter Hall Limited acquired all the issued share capital in ASX-listed Folkstone Limited. Folkstone Limited was a real estate funds manager and developer that engaged in residential and commercial development projects throughout Australia. At the time of the acquisition, Folkstone Limited had $1.6bn AUM and a 12% interest in the largest A-REIT that invested in early learning properties

  • in November 2016, CNI and associated entities acquired the 360 Capital Group real estate platform. At the time, 360 Capital Group’s platform managed $1.4bn in assets including two ASX listed REITs

  • in April 2016, Growthpoint announced the proposed acquisition of GPT Metro Office Fund, which included a separate transaction with GPT to acquire the management rights to the fund. At the time of the acquisition, GPT Metro Office Fund had six properties located across New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland

  • in February 2016, an entity stapled to the Investa Commercial Property Fund agreed to purchase Investa Office Management Holdings. At the time of the acquisition, the management entity was responsible for 22 office investments in CBD markets across Australia.

Selected multiple

Having regard to the comparable listed companies and the comparable transactions outlined above, we have applied an earnings multiple ranging from 14.0x to 15.0x, on a control basis for the following reasons:

  • on the whole, the listed diversified real estate funds managers are of differing scales when compared to PWG and have substantial co-investment portfolios (along with other business activities) making it increasingly difficult in most cases to accurately isolate the value and earnings associated with the funds management business

  • the listed equities funds management companies focus on other asset classes and have more diversified operations and differing growth outlooks. Whilst multiples for the funds management businesses are easier to accurately ascertain, the nature of their businesses and the returns generated by them, along with factoring control, suggest that PWG should be valued at a premium to those businesses

  • the average and median multiples of the specific transactions identified in Table 30 are 9.5x and 9.1x respectively. However, the transactions identified involved smaller or less diversified businesses (i.e. single fund/platform businesses) and so, in our opinion, PWG should be valued at a premium to such multiples. More specifically:

  • PWG should command a higher multiple when compared to the transaction multiples because it is:

    • well diversified through its sector exposure compared to the transaction targets

    • the manager of numerous funds rather than being reliant on one or two major funds. This reduces the risk of significant lost revenue from being removed as manager

  • the Precinct Properties transaction provides a relevant datapoint due to the transaction recently completing in March 2021

  • the Augusta transaction occurred in the midst of the initial economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic and thus the multiple implied by that transaction could be viewed as reflecting a poor economic outlook including exposure of the fund manager to specific sectors that had substantial potential negative exposure to COVID-19 at the time. The business was impacted by the pandemic and the transaction price was adjusted to reflect this

  • whilst other transactions were prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 360 Capital listed property platform was largely focussed on the management of funds in the metropolitan office and industrial property sectors

  • PWG’s risk of removal as manager is lower due to the number of funds that it manages. Each fund has an individual agreement with PWG for management services. Generally, to be removed as manager, a special resolution would need to be passed by a majority of investors. Further to this, the Founding Directors and their family and associates hold underlying investments in the majority of the funds

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

48

110 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

  • CNI is operationally most comparable to PWG, being largely a real estate funds manager focused on the Australian property sector.

We consider that PWG should be valued at a multiple which is a discount to the CNI trading multiple of 17.3x. Quantifying the level of discount that would apply, with certainty, is difficult, but based on our experience we consider that a discount of 10% to 20% would not be inappropriate. In arriving at this assessment, we had particular regard to the following:

  • CNI is significantly larger than PWG, with approximately double the AUM at $10.5bn compared to PWG’s AUM of $5.0bn

  • PWG’s geographic exposure is more concentrated in the Western Australia market (54% of PWG’s AUM is located in Western Australia), whereas CNI is more diverse (properties located across Australia and New Zealand with largest concentration of 22% and 20% in Queensland and New South Wales, respectively)

  • PWG is heavily reliant on its Founding Directors and current management team to source and acquire new properties for its funds through their personal relationships as well as having significant interests in the underlying funds through associates. As mentioned above, the Founding Directors of PWG hold 53.3% of securities on issue (as at 31 March 2021)

  • notwithstanding that CNI is largely focused on real estate funds management, it does have substantial property investment activities. This is evident from observing its NTA as a percentage of market capitalisation, which is 41%. The higher the percentage observed, the less comparable the company may be to a pure real estate funds manager, as a result of substantial co-investments and development properties held.

6.2.3 Co-investments

We have valued the co-investments currently held by PWG based on their fair value as at 30 April 2021 of $41.2m[15] . These investments largely comprise PWG’s holdings in unlisted funds as well as a holding in Clime Investment Management Limited. Listed investments are held at quoted prices in active markets whilst unlisted investments are based on the underlying assets fair values which are independently valued annually and recorded in the financial statements.

6.2.4 Non-operating assets

We have identified the following non-operating assets which relate to PWG’s interest in VTH. We note that VTH is the subject of competing takeover offers from entities associated with ROC Private Equity and Macquarie.

At the date of this report, PWG’s interest in VTH (held through Primewest Property Fund) was valued at $37.9m (reflecting the exercised call option over 30m units in VTH as well as the remaining units held) plus a facilitation payment of $8.0m for the management rights of VTH. We understand from discussions with PWG Management that no capital gains tax is payable by PWG upon the realised gain on the sale of these units as these proceeds are distributed to individual unitholders in Primewest Property Fund.

Table 31: Summary of non-operating assets

Table 31: Summary of non-operating assets
$m
VTH management rights facilitation payment 8.0
VTH 30m units – exercised under call option 29.3
VTH 6.8m remaining units 8.6
VTH 2.5 cent dividend payable on remaining units 0.2
Non-operating assets 46.1

Sources: Management, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

15 Co-investments have been valued based on their fair value as at 30 April 2021, with the exception of the investment in ASX-listed Clime Investment Management Limited which has been valued as at the date of this report

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

49

Target’s Statement 111

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

6.2.5 Net cash

PWG’s forecast net cash position at 30 June 2021, being a proxy for the anticipated cash balance upon completion of the Proposed Transaction is estimated at $66.9m. This is summarised below.

Table 32: Summary of net cash

$m
Lease liability (1.2)
Cash 68.0
Net cash 66.9

Sources: Management, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

6.2.6 Conclusion on value

A summary of the application of the market multiples method is set out below:

Table 33: Summary of PWG valuation outcome

Table 33: Summary of PWG valuation outcome
Unit Low High
Selected maintainable EBITDA $m 29.0 30.0
Selected maintainable EBITDA multiple on a control basis times 14.0 15.0
Enterprise value of PWG on a control basis $m 406.0 450.0
Co-investments $m 41.2 41.2
Non-operating assets $m 46.1 46.1
Net cash as at 30 June 2021 $m 66.9 66.9
Equity value on a control basis $m 560.2 604.2
Outstanding securities m 396.5 396.5
Equity value per PWG security $ 1.41 1.52

Source: Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

Cross-checks of our assessed valuation

6.3.1 Percentage of AUM approach

As a cross-check of our valuation of PWG under the market multiples method, we have determined the implied percentage of AUM metrics of our assessed market value of PWG (excluding co-investments) on a control basis and compared this to the implied percentage of AUM metrics observed for the comparable listed companies and transactions.

The implied percentage of AUM metrics of our assessed market value of PWG on a control basis range from 8.1% to 9.0%, as calculated in the table below:

Table 34: Implied percentage of AUM

Unit Low High
Assessed value of PWG on a control basis $m 406.0 450.0
AUM $bn 5.0 5.0
Value as a % of AUM % 8.1% 9.0%

Source: Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

A key driver of the percentage of AUM metric is the earnings generated from the underlying AUM. Companies that have a higher percentage of operating earnings per AUM (i.e. generate higher earnings from AUM) generally have a higher percentage of AUM metric. In this regard, PWG’s EBITDA per AUM percentage of 0.5% is higher than the median of comparable listed companies and median of comparable transactions, and therefore supports PWG having a higher percentage of AUM metric than the median for the comparable listed companies.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

50

112 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

6.3.2 Capitalisation of earnings method

We have also used the capitalisation of earnings method as a cross-check of our valuation of PWG. In using it as a cross-check, we determined the IRR implied by our valuation, and then assessed the reasonableness of this IRR having regard to the discount rates applicable for comparable funds management businesses.

As we were not provided with forecast cash flows beyond FY21, we prepared a high level, capitalisation of earnings calculation using the Gordon Growth method and the following assumptions:

  • maintainable pre-tax earnings of $29.5m, being the mid-point of the range adopted in our valuation

  • 30% company tax rate

  • no adjustment for capital expenditure, depreciation and working capital on the basis that historical evidence and our own experience suggests these are likely to be insignificant

  • earnings growth of 2% into perpetuity.

These capitalised cash flows imply an internal rate of return of 7% based on the mid-point of our valuation range for PWG. This is also often described as a discount rate. Such a discount rate is not unreasonable based on our experience of the cost of capital that is typically ascribed to a fund management business that generates a significant portion of fee income from base management fees derived from the value of completed and well tenanted properties.

Consequently, we consider this high level capitalisation of earnings analysis supports our valuation range determined under the primary market multiples method.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

51

Target’s Statement 113

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

7 Valuation of the Consideration

Introduction

We have estimated the market value of the Consideration to be in the range from $1.43 to $1.52 per PWG security, as set out in the table below.

Table 35: Value of the Consideration

Table 35: Value of the Consideration
$ Low High
Cash component of the Consideration $0.20 $0.20
Scripcomponent of the Consideration $1.23 $1.32
Total value of the Consideration $1.43 $1.52
Source: Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

We have estimated the market value of a security in the PME (on a minority basis) to be in the range of $2.60 to $2.80 per security. When applied to the merger conversion ratio of 0.473, this results in a value of $1.23 to $1.32. This valuation has been performed on a minority interest basis because if the Proposed Transaction proceeds, PWG securityholders will become minority securityholders in the PME.

We have selected the market based method to assess the market value of a security in the PME, having regard to recent market trading activity in CNI securities. In selecting the market based method, we have taken into account that PWG securityholders will collectively only hold 23.8% of the PME subsequent to the implementation of the Proposed Transaction.

Analysis of recent share trading in CNI securities

The trading price of a listed company security should provide an objective assessment of the market value of the entity’s equity where the market is well informed and liquid. Market prices incorporate the influence of all publicly known information relevant to the value of an entity’s securities.

In the six months and twelve months prior to the announcement of the Proposed Transaction, 124.0m and 293.5m CNI securities were traded respectively, representing 22.0% and 55.0% of CNI’s outstanding securities on issue. Approximately 3.3% of CNI’s securities on issue have traded since the announcement of the Proposed Transaction. We consider that there is modest but adequate liquidity in CNI securities.

CNI periodically releases reports detailing operational activities as well as financial information regarding CNI’s financial performance and position. Further, both CNI and PWG released several announcements to the market detailing the terms and the strategic rationale underpinning the Proposed Transaction.

CNI is covered by six equity research brokerage houses, between them adopting a range of fundamental valuation approaches to assess the value of CNI on an ongoing basis. As at 11 May 2021 at least five of the brokerage houses had released reports detailing the Proposed Transaction.

If the Proposed Transaction is successful, the new CNI securities received by PWG securityholders will effectively be securities in the PME. CNI’s securities trading since the announcement of the Proposed Transaction on 19 April 2021 effectively incorporates the market’s view of the prospects of the PME, to the extent that the market expects the Proposed Transaction will be implemented. Due to the moderate liquidity of CNI’s securities and the amount of information available to the market regarding both CNI and PWG and the Proposed Transaction, we are of the view that the market price of a CNI security after the announcement of the Proposed Transaction provides good evidence of the market price of the consideration offered.

The figure below illustrates CNI’s security price history for the period starting 1 January 2021 until 11 May 2021.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

52

114 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

==> picture [367 x 157] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figure 17: CNI security price performance
3.0 6.0
2.8 5.0
2.6 4.0
2.4 3.0
2.2 2.0
2.0 1.0
1.8 -
Proposed Transaction announcement CNI volume (RHS) CNI share price (LHS)
Note:
1. The Proposed Transaction was announced on 19 April 2021.
Sources: S&P Capital IQ, ASX announcements, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis
Volume (m)
Share price ($)
Jan 2021 Feb 2021 Mar 2021 Apr 2021 May 2021
----- End of picture text -----

The closing security price of a CNI security on the day prior to the announcement of the Proposed Transaction was $2.77 per security, whilst its most recent closing price was $2.65 per security on 11 May 2021. CNI securities initially decreased by 2 cents on the day of the transaction to $2.75, followed by a period of price volatility with closing prices ranging from $2.64 to $2.82 with a VWAP of $2.72 per security, as the market traded based on the new information. Post the announcement of the Proposed Transaction, broker target prices are in the range of $2.49 to $3.00 per security.

Set out below is the market trading of CNI securities since the announcement of the Proposed Transaction.

Table 36: Trading in CNI securities since the announcement of the Proposed Transaction

$ Price
Security Price TradingRange from 19 April 2021 to 11 May2021 2.64 to 2.82
VWAP from 19 April 2021 to 11 May2021 2.72
Most recent trading price as at 11 May 2021 2.65
Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

The following factors are likely to have an impact on the market’s view around the PME, hence having an impact on CNI’s security price since the announcement of the Proposed Transaction:

  • the Proposed Transaction is perceived to be value accretive to both CNI and PWG securityholders as set out in the analysis presented in Section 5.5

  • the Proposed Transaction will change the profile of CNI, as the PME is a larger and more diversified portfolio when compared to CNI on a standalone basis

  • the Directors of PWG have already announced their intentions to vote in favour of the Proposed Transaction subject to certain conditions.

Based on this, we have assessed the value of a security in PME to be in the range of $2.60 to $2.80.

Valuation cross-check

We have cross-checked the valuation of the PME by reference to market multiples implied by trading in listed companies, and transactions in comparable companies.

The EBITDA and AUM multiple implied by our valuation of the PME is set out in the table below.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

53

Target’s Statement 115

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Table 37: Cross-check of the PME valuation

Unit Low High
Valueper PME security $ 2.60 2.80
Pro forma number of securities m 787.8 787.8
Equity value of the PME $m 2,048.2 2,205.7
less: VTH co-investment $m (37.9) (37.9)
less: VTH management rights $m (8.0) (8.0)
add: value of net debt $m 129.6 129.6
less: value of co-investments $m (797.1) (797.1)
Enterprise value of the PME $m 1,410.6 1,568.1
AUM1 $bn 15.2 15.2
EV/AUM % 9.3% 10.3%
EBITDA2 $m 79.7 79.7
EBITDA multiple Times 17.7 19.7
Notes:
  1. AUM comprises the total PME AUM of $15.5bn, less the AUM of VTH ($0.3bn)

  2. Pro forma EBIT of the PME (as set out in Table 26), excluding co-investment and interest income, and adjusted for estimated depreciation (using FY20 depreciation as a proxy), and earnings from the VTH management rights.

Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis

The cross-check eliminates the contribution of co-investments and other assets in order to imply the multiples of the core funds management business. Surplus assets, including the value attributable to the management rights of VTH and the value of the VTH co-investment have been excluded, based on the most recent offer made between Macquarie and VTH. The value of other unlisted co-investments was estimated by reference to the most recent assessment for fair value accounting, and listed coinvestments were assessed by reference to recent security trading prices.

In relation to the cross-check set out above, we had regard to the following:

  • the PME represents a larger, more diversified (as measured by geography, sector and fund type exposure) real estate funds manager than either PWG or CNI on a stand-alone basis. The Management teams from both entities will continue to run the operations of the combined business, and furthermore, expect to realise revenue and cost synergies across the combined businesses

  • with reference to our analysis and discussion in Section 6, we consider that PME is likely to trade at a multiple substantially higher than that implied by the listed equities fund managers and also the recent transactions and closer to the multiples of the real estate investment entities.

We consider the observed market parameters to broadly support our valuation of the PME.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

54

116 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Appendix 1: Context to the report

Individual circumstances

We have evaluated the Proposed Transaction for PWG securityholders as a whole and have not considered the effect of the Proposed Transaction on the particular circumstances of individual investors. Due to their particular circumstances, individual investors may place a different emphasis on various aspects of the Proposed Transaction from the one adopted in this report. Accordingly, individuals may reach different conclusions to ours on whether the Proposed Transaction is fair and reasonable. If in doubt investors should consult an independent adviser, who should have regard to their individual circumstances.

Limitations, qualifications, declarations and consents

Our opinion is based on the prevailing economic, market and other conditions as at the date of this report. Such conditions can change significantly over relatively short periods of time. Recent volatility in capital markets and the current economic outlook have created significant uncertainty with respect to the valuation of assets. Recognising all of these factors, our valuation and therefore our opinion may be more susceptible to change than would normally be the case.

The report has been prepared at the request of the Independent Directors of PWG and is to be included in the Target’s Statement to be given to PWG securityholders for approval of the Proposed Transaction.

Accordingly, it has been prepared only for the benefit of the Independent Directors and those persons entitled to receive the Target’s Statement in their assessment of the Proposed Transaction outlined in the report and should not be used for any other purpose. Neither Deloitte Corporate Finance, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, nor any member or employee thereof, undertakes responsibility to any person, other than the PWG securityholders and PWG, in respect of this report, including any errors or omissions however caused.

This engagement has been conducted in accordance with professional standard APES 225 Valuation Services issued by the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board Limited.

Statements and opinions contained in this report are given in good faith but, in the preparation of this report, Deloitte Corporate Finance has relied upon the completeness of the information provided by PWG and CNI and its officers, employees, agents or advisors (as set out below in ‘Sources of Information’). Deloitte does not imply, nor should it be construed, that it has carried out any form of audit or verification on the information and records supplied to us.

Drafts of our report were issued to PWG and CNI management, and their advisors, for confirmation of factual accuracy.

In recognition that Deloitte Corporate Finance may rely on information provided by PWG and its officers, employees, agents or advisors, PWG has agreed that it will not make any claim against Deloitte Corporate Finance to recover any loss or damage which PWG may suffer as a result of that reliance and that it will indemnify Deloitte Corporate Finance against any liability that arises out of either Deloitte Corporate Finance’s reliance on the information provided by PWG and its officers, employees, agents or advisors or the failure by PWG and its officers, employees, agents or advisors to provide Deloitte Corporate Finance with any material information relating to the Proposed Transaction.

To the extent that this report refers to prospective financial information we have considered the prospective financial information and the basis of the underlying assumptions. The procedures involved in Deloitte’s consideration of this information consisted of enquiries of PWG personnel and analytical procedures applied to the financial data. These procedures and enquiries did not include verification work nor constitute an audit or a review engagement in accordance with standards issued by the AUASB or equivalent body and therefore the information used in undertaking our work may not be entirely reliable.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

55

Target’s Statement 117

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Based on these procedures and enquiries, Deloitte considers that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the prospective financial information for PWG and CNI included in this report has been prepared on a reasonable basis in accordance with ASIC RG 111. In relation to the prospective financial information, actual results may be different from the prospective financial information of PWG and CNI referred to in this report since anticipated events frequently do not occur as expected and the variation may be material. The achievement of the prospective financial information is dependent on the outcome of the assumptions. Accordingly, we express no opinion as to whether the prospective financial information will be achieved.

Deloitte Corporate Finance holds the appropriate Australian Financial Services licence to issue this report and is owned by the Australian Partnership Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. The employees of Deloitte Corporate Finance principally involved in the preparation of this report were Tapan Parekh, Partner, M.Com, B.Bus, F.Fin, CA (BV Specialist) and Stephen Reid, Partner, M App. Fin. Inv., B.Ec, CA. Each has many years experience in the provision of corporate financial advice, including specific advice on valuations, mergers and acquisitions, as well as the preparation of expert reports.

Consent to being named in disclosure document

Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited (ACN 003 833 127) of 225 George Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000 acknowledges that:

  • PWG proposes to issue a disclosure document in respect of the Proposed Transaction (the Target’s Statement)

  • the Target’s Statement will be issued in hard copy and be available in electronic format

  • it has previously received a copy of the draft Target’s Statement for review

  • it is named in the Target’s Statement as the ‘independent expert’ and the Target’s Statement includes its independent expert’s report in Appendix 1 of the Target’s Statement.

On the basis that the Target’s Statement is consistent in all material respects with the draft Target’s Statement received, Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited consents to it being named in the Target’s Statement in the form and context in which it is so named, to the inclusion of its independent expert’s report in Appendix 1 of the Target’s Statement and to all references to its independent expert’s report in the form and context in which they are included, whether the Target’s Statement is issued in hard copy or electronic format or both.

Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited has not authorised or caused the issue of the Target’s Statement and takes no responsibility for any part of the Target’s Statement, other than any references to its name and the independent expert’s report as included in Appendix 1 of the Target’s Statement.

Sources of information

In preparing this report we have had access to the following principal sources of information:

  • draft copy of the Target’s Statement and Bidder’s Statement

  • financial reports for FY18, FY19, FY20 and 1HY21 for both PWG and CNI

  • CNI and PWG merger announcement presentations dated 19 April 2021

  • PWG company website

  • CNI company website

  • publicly available information on comparable companies and market transactions published by ASIC, Thomson Research, S&P Capital IQ and Mergermarket

  • ASX announcements

  • other publicly available information, media releases and brokers reports on PWG and CNI and the real estate funds management industry / sectors.

In addition, we have had discussions and correspondence with certain directors and executives, including Erin Flaherty, Independent Non-Executive Director; Hamish Beck, Independent Non-Executive Director; David Creasy, Chief Financial Officer; as well as their advisers Moelis, in relation to the above information and to current operations and prospects.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

56

118 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Appendix 2: Valuation methodologies

Common market practice and the valuation methodologies which are applicable to corporate entities and businesses can be categorised under one of the following three approaches.

Market approach

The market approach involves the determination of fair value having regard to pricing and other metrics implied by market trading or transactions of comparable assets. Such methods commonly include:

  • earnings multiples

  • analysis of an entity’s recent share trading history

  • • industry specific methods.

The earnings multiple method estimates fair value as the product of an entity’s earnings and appropriate earnings multiple. An appropriate earnings multiple is derived from market trading and/or transactions involving comparable companies. The earnings multiple method is appropriate where the entity’s earnings are relatively stable.

The most recent share trading history provides evidence of the fair value of the shares in an entity where they are publicly traded in an informed and liquid market.

Industry specific methods estimate market value using rules of thumb for a particular industry. Generally, rules of thumb provide less persuasive evidence of the market value of an entity than other valuation methods because they may not account for entity specific factors.

Income approach

The income approach involves the determination of fair value based on the present value of future amounts. Discounted cash flow methods estimate fair value by discounting an entity’s future cash flows using an appropriate cost of capital to reflect the risks of the cash flows, to a net present value. These methods are appropriate where a projection of future cash flows can be made with a reasonable degree of confidence. Discounted cash flow methods are commonly used to value early stage companies or projects with a finite life.

Cost approach

The cost approach involves the determination of fair value based on the cost of replacement. Such methods estimate the fair value of an entity’s shares based on the realisable value of its identifiable net assets, and typically comprise:

  • orderly realisation of assets method

  • liquidation of assets method

  • net assets on a going concern basis.

The orderly realisation of assets method estimates fair value by determining the amount that would be distributed to shareholders, after payment of all liabilities including realisation costs and taxation charges that arise, assuming the entity is wound up in an orderly manner.

The liquidation method is similar to the orderly realisation of assets method except the liquidation method assumes the assets are sold in a shorter time frame. Since wind up or liquidation of the entity may not be contemplated, these methods in their strictest form may not necessarily be appropriate. The net assets on a going concern basis method estimates the market values of the net assets of an entity but does not take account of realisation costs.

These asset-based methods ignore the possibility that the entity’s value could exceed the realisable value of its assets as they ignore the value of intangible assets such as customer lists, management, supply arrangements and goodwill. Asset based methods are appropriate when companies are not profitable, a significant proportion of an entity’s assets are liquid, or for asset holding companies.

Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide

57

Target’s Statement 119

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

The table below sets out our selected comparable listed companies. We have attempted to identify those companies whose primary operations are in the
provision of funds management services to property funds, however, there are no listed Australian pure-play property funds managers (of scale) and therefore we
have considered companies that are in the broader funds management industry. We recognise that there are other Australian listed real estate entities which
operate as real estate investment managers, however, considering the substantial co-investment portfolios of these managers (along with, in some cases, other
business activities) it is difficult to isolate metrics for the fund management component to allow for suitable and accurate comparison to PWG, CNI and PME.
Table 38: Comparable listed companies
AUM
($m)
EV /
AUM
LTM
Revenue
/ AUM
LTM
EBITDA
/ AUM
AUM
($m)
EV /
AUM
LTM
Revenue
/ AUM
LTM
EBITDA
/ AUM
0.4% n/a n/a 1.1%
0.8%
0.6%
0.2%
0.5%
0.2%
19.0%2
1.0%
0.3%
Notes:
1.
Market capitalisation is as at 11 May 2021, with the exception of CNI which is as at 16 April 2021 (being the last trading day before the transaction was announced)
2.
EV has been adjusted to exclude co-investments. The adjusted enterprise value is used to calculate EBITDA and AUM multiples
3.
For the 12 months to 31 December 2020, with the exception of Pendal which is 30 September 2020
4.
Financial year ended 30 June 2021, with the exception of Pendal which is 30 September 2021
5.
Current and Forward EBITDA multiples are based on broker projections, adjusted to exclude co-investment income in CNI and PWG.
Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis
1.4% n/a n/a
10,200
10.0%2
n/a n/a 10.4%2 2.2%2 1.7%2
46,400 2,900 23,598 89,200 101,700 5,046
EBITDA margins Forward4,
5
38% 75% 51% 71% 33% 40% n/a
n/a
Current4,5 38% 74% 53% 73% 32% 37%
LTM3 29% 51% 53% 74% 27% 37% 28%
EBITDA multiple Forward4,5 16.7x2 16.1x 19.6x 12.6x2
12.7x2
10.1x2
8.5x2
9.0x2
8.0x2
n/a
n/a
Current4,5 17.3x2 19.2x 20.0x
**LTM3 ** 23.9x2 22.9x 20.7x 12.2x2 14.3x2 10.0x2 nmf
Company name
Market
cap1
($m)
EV2
($m)
Gearing
6.2% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% Australian Ethical
981
9592
0.0%
1,0222 6,609 284 Equity fund managers Platinum
2,735
2,4452
Perpetual
1,943
1,9912
Pendal
2,182
1,7712
CNI
1,663
Real estate fund managers Charter Hall
6,553
APN Property
296

120 Primewest Group

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

Appendix 4: Comparable transactions Table 39: Comparable transactions Implied
Implied
Implied
Announcement
Consideration1
AUM
consideration
EBIT
EBITDA
EBIT(DA)
date
Target
Acquirer
($m)
($m)
as % of AUM1
multiple1
multiple1
/AUM
Mar-21
Precinct Properties New Zealand Limited
Precinct Properties New Zealand Limited
197
3,203
6.1%
14.7x
n/a
0.4%
Oct-20
Investec Australia Property Fund
Investec Property Limited
40
1,385
2.9%
9.1x
9.1x
0.3%
Jun-20
GoFARM Asset Management
Primewest
10
283
3.5%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Jun-20
Augusta Capital Limited
Centuria Capital Group
49
1,723
2.8%
5.0x
n/a
0.6%
Sep-19
GARDA Capital Group
GARDA Diversified Property Fund
31
404
7.6%
9.1x
9.0x
0.8%
May-19
Heathley Limited
CNI
39
620
6.2%
12.1x2
n/a
0.8%
Aug-18
Folkestone
Charter Hall Group
56
1,609
3.5%
7.7x
n/a
0.5%
Aug-18
Aventus Property Group Pty Limited
AHL
148
2,000
7.4%
n/a
9.1x
0.8%
Aug-17
Astro Japan Property Group
Blackstone
22
1,163
1.9%
8.0x
n/a
0.2%
May-17
Armada Real Estate Asset Management
Moelis Australia
30
800
3.7%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Nov-16
360 Capital listed property platform
Centuria Capital Group and associated
entities
102
1,395
7.3%
11.2x
n/a
0.7%
Jul-16
GPT Management Holding Limited
Growthpoint Properties Australia Trust
9
439
2.0%
6.9x
n/a
0.3%
Jun-16
Generation Healthcare management
platform
Northwest Healthcare Properties REIT
36
2,000
1.8%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Mar-16
Investa Office Management Platform
Investa Commercial Property Fund
90
8,500
1.1%
9.4x
8.7x
0.1%
Jan-15
Valad Europe property management
platform
Cromwell Property Group
158
7,600
2.1%
n/a
6.4x
0.3%
Nov-14
Arena Investment Management
Arena
12
384
3.0%
10.5x
n/a
0.3%
Jun 14 /
Westfield Australia and New Zealand real
Westfield Retail Trust (Scentre Group)
2,1583
38,600
5.6%
11.1x
n/a
0.5%
Dec 13
estate
Dec-13
Commonwealth Property Office Fund
(CPA)
DEXUS
41
3,700
1.1%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Dec-13
Commonwealth Managed Investments CFS Retail Property Trust
475
13,939
3.4%
12.4x
n/a
0.3%
Average
195
4,724
3.8%
9.8x
8.5x
0.5%
Median
41
1,609
3.4%
9.4x
9.0x
0.4%
Notes: 1.
Consideration paid is on a 100% interest acquisition basis and excludes any amounts paid for co-investments at the completion of the transaction. This adjusted consideration is used to
calculate EBIT and AUM multiples 2.
Adjusted to include NTA
3.
The consideration is based on the implied value of the management platform set out in the securityholder booklet dated April 2014.
Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Deloitte Corporate Finance analysis Primewest Group Limited- Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide
59

Target’s Statement 121

APPENDIX 1. INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT

About Deloitte

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and their affiliated entities are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

Deloitte is a leading global provider of audit and assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax and related services. Our network of member firms in more than 150 countries and territories serves four out of five Fortune Global 500®companies. Learn how Deloitte’s approximately 286,000 people make an impact that matters at www.deloitte.com.

Deloitte Asia Pacific

Deloitte Asia Pacific Limited is a company limited by guarantee and a member firm of DTTL. Members of Deloitte Asia Pacific Limited and their related entities provide services in Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, East Timor, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Singapore, Thailand, The Marshall Islands, The Northern Mariana Islands, The People’s Republic of China (incl. Hong Kong SAR and Macau SAR), The Philippines and Vietnam, in each of which operations are conducted by separate and independent legal entities.

Deloitte Australia

In Australia, the Deloitte Network member is the Australian partnership of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. As one of Australia’s leading professional services firms, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and its affiliates provide audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services through approximately 8000 people across the country. Focused on the creation of value and growth, and known as an employer of choice for innovative human resources programs, we are dedicated to helping our clients and our people excel. For more information, please visit our web site at https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en.html.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Member of Deloitte Asia Pacific Limited and the Deloitte Network.

© 2021 Deloitte Corporate Finance. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Primewest Group Limited - Independent expert’s report and Financial Services Guide 60

122 Primewest Group

DIRECTORY

Issuer of Centuria Securities

Centuria Capital Group Level 41, Chifley Tower 2 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 Australia

Offeror

Centuria Capital Limited, acting in its own capacity and as nomiee for Centuria Capital Fund Level 41, Chifley Tower 2 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 Australia

Share Registry of the Offeror

Boardroom Pty Limited Level 12, 225 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia

Australian Legal Advisers

Hamilton Locke Pty Ltd Australia Square Level 42/ 264 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia

Financial Adviser

Moelis Australia Level 27, Governor Philip Tower One Farrer Place Sydney, NSW 2000 Australia

Tax Adviser

PwC One International Towers Watermans Quay Barangaroo NSW 2000

Target’s Statement

iii

GLOSSARY

iv

Primewest Group