CAZALY RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2021

Aug 30, 2021

ASX ANNOUCEMENT

31August 2021

EXTENSIVE COPPER-ZINC MINERALISATION

CONFIRMED AT MOUNT ANGELO NORTH

• Results confirm and extend high grade zones of Copper mineralisation

o 9m @ 12.5% Copper

o 24m @ 3.38% Copper

o 10m @ 2.17% Copper o 9m @ 2.81% Copper

• Zinc lodes increasing in grade with depth

o 7m @ 1.81% Zinc

o 13m @ 1.34% Zinc o 18m @ 1.17% Zinc

• Potential new open areas defined down plunge

Cazaly Resources Limited (ASX: CAZ , “ Cazaly ” or “ the Company ”) is pleased to announce that the majority of assay results have been received from its recent drilling campaign at the Mount Angelo North Cu-Zn Project located within the Halls Creek Copper project (“the Project”) in the Kimberley region of Western Australia.

This is the first drilling to be conducted at the project since the Company acquired full control of the project with CEO Tara French commenting, “ The results are excellent and extend the known mineralisation at Mount Angelo North whilst confirming the high grade continuity of the deposit. We are now looking forward to updating the resource and further exploring the wider region for further mineralisation .”

Seven RC drillholes were completed at Mount Angelo North in June 2021 to test the continuity of shallow Cu-Zn mineralisation and explore the potential extensions to known sulphide mineralisation along strike and down dip. One RC drill hole with a diamond drill hole tail was also drilled to test a previously defined downhole electromagnetic (“EM”) target.

The RC results confirm good, consistent high grade Cu-Zn mineralisation and has marginally extended the known limits of the deposit. The drilling, and recent re-modelling also highlighted a potential new down plunge position for Zn mineralisation. Maximum single metre values returned from the drilling included: 37.9% Cu, 4.10% Zn, 1.20% Pb, 63 g/t Ag & 1.57 g/t Au .

Recent drilling has highlighted the robust nature of the shallow oxide copper mineralisation near surface (Figure 1, Copper Intercepts). Drilling to date is shallow with the majority of drill holes <100m deep. Recent high grade intercepts show growth potential at depth, down dip and down plunge. In addition to the main body of mineralisation two separate Cu mineralised lodes have been identified beneath the main lode.

L3, 30 Richardson Street West Perth WA 6005 PO BOX 396 West Perth WA 6872 Ph: +61 8 93226283 www.cazalyresources.com.au

==> picture [521 x 669] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

055 060
059
061
058
055
061 059
058
055 058
056
056
055 060
058
061 059 058
058
061 059
061 055
055 058
061
056
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 1. Mount Angelo North. Contoured Cu intercepts >0.5% and Zn intercepts >0.5%

2

Contoured Zn intercepts show broad zones of high grade mineralisation increasing with depth to the southwest, with two potential high grade shoots open down plunge (Figure 1, Zinc Intercepts). Zn is also present in the subparallel mineralised lodes (shown in Figure 1) located at depth that remain to be tested along strike. Further work is required to determine the extent of Cu and Zn mineralisation open down plunge to the south, mineralisation down dip of high grade zones and extensions to subparallel lodes at depth.

Recent drilling detail including all hole azimuths and dips are included in Appendix 1 and 2 to this report. Intercepts in Appendix 2 are reported using a 0.2% Copper and 0.2% Zinc lower cut, no upper cut, with a maximum 4m consecutive internal dilution.

The Project is situated near the township of Halls Creek covering part of the Halls Creek Mobile Zone and hosts the Mount Angelo North Copper-Zinc deposit (Figure 2), an extensive zone of shallow oxide Cu-Zn mineralisation overlying massive Cu-Zn sulphide mineralisation. It comprises massive and stringer copper sulphides, principally chalcocite and chalcopyrite, characteristic of volcanic massive sulphide (VMS) mineralisation. The deposit also contains appreciable zinc and silver with subordinate gold and lead.

==> picture [487 x 352] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2. Location of Halls Creek Project and Mount Angelo North Deposit

Previous results from work conducted by Cazaly at Mount Angelo North included 64m @ 2.72% Cu (1.13% Zn), 62m @ 2.41% Cu (2.75% Zn), 37m @ 2.63% Cu (6.05% Zn), 16m @ 5.91% Cu, 18m @ 2.53% Cu (Refer to CAZ ASX announcement dated 26 April 2021).

3

Table 1: Anomalous RC Drill Intercepts >1% Cu, Mount Angelo North Cu-Zn Prospect

HoleID	East	North	Depth (m)			INTERCEPTS	INTERCEPTS	INTERCEPTS	INTERCEPTS	INTERCEPTS
				From (m)	Length (m)	Cu (%)	Pb (%)	Zn (%)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppm)
HCRC0055	340,522	7,960,642	95	8	10	1.38	0.26	1.54	14	0.06
" "				26	10	2.17	0.02	0.14	8	0.11
" "				54	14	1.98	0.04	0.32	15	0.14
" "			including	60	8	3.15	0.06	0.47	23	0.20
HCRC056	340,436	7,960,498	113	78	1	1.57	0.02	1.66	9	0.00
HCRC057	340,541	7,960,448	Diamond drillholepre-collar			Assays awaited
HCRC058	340,503	7,960,679	80	17	1	6.48	0.02	0.56	7	0.03
" "				46	24	3.38	0.03	0.83	18	0.25
" "			including	56	6	8.54	0.07	0.97	46	0.63
HCRC059	340,502	7,960,661	59	33	9	12.5	0.13	0.10	30	0.35
HCRC060	340,482	7,960,683	40	6	5	1.89	0.10	2.10	20	0.16
HCRC061	340,466	7,960,656	59	16	1	1.17	0.29	0.90	5	0.11
" "				23	9	2.81	0.05	0.21	6	0.05
nb; Cu, Pb, Zn and Ag analysed by 4 acid digest and ICP-MS finish. Au analysed by Fire Assay and AAS finish.
All holes located on a MGA94-52 GDA grid. Intercepts estimated with 0.5% Cu minimium cut, maximum 4m internal dilution

Other Work

Final assays are pending for the diamond core drillhole. Ground EM surveys have now been completed, targeting potential extensions to the Mount Angelo VMS system and other regional targets. This data is currently being processed and the results will be reported in due course.

Cazaly would like to acknowledge the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) Exploration Incentive Scheme (EIS), a State Government initiative that aims to encourage exploration in Western Australia.

ENDS

For and on behalf of the Cazaly Board

---

For further information please contact:

Tara French (CEO) / Clive Jones (Director)

Cazaly Resources Limited

Tel: +61 8 9322 6283 Em: admin@cazalyresources.com.au Website: www.cazalyresources.com.au

The information contained herein that relates to Exploration Results is based upon information compiled or reviewed by Mr Don Horn, who is an employee of the Company. Mr Horn is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which they are undertaking to qualify as a Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Horn consents to the inclusion of his name in the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.

4

APPENDIX 1

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Halls Creek The Mount Angelo copper-zinc depositwas sampled using Reverse Circulation (RC) drill holes and an NQ2 diamond drill hole. Holes were drilled on various grid spacings angled -50° to -90° to varying azimuths designed to drill perpendicular to the strike of mineralisation.
	Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Collar positions were located with a handheld GPS with an expected accuracy of ±5m. Hole azimuth was measured with a geological compass at the collar location. Down hole surveys were taken with a Reflex Ez-Trac tool every 30m down hole. Diamond drill core is aligned and measured by tape, comparing back to down hole core blocks consistent with industry practice. 1 industry prepared independent base metal multielement standard was inserted per hole drilled.
	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. RC samples were collected at 1 metre intervals by a riffle splitter (2-3kg) within the interpreted ore zone. Outside the ore zone 1m spear samples were composited to 4m intervals at the geologist’s instruction. All RC samples were sent to the accredited Bureau Veritas laboratory in Perth for sorting, crushing, pulverization and analysis by fire assay (Au, Pt, Pd) and four acid digest (multielement suite) methods. Diamond core was sent to Perth where intervals of mineralization and/or alteration were cut in half using an Almonte diamond blade saw. Samples were primarily 1m. Selected intervals of veining, sulphides or geological breaks were sampled at varying lengths. ½ Core samples were also sent to Bureau Veritas Perth for the same analysis as RC samples detailed above.

5

Criteria	JORC Code explanation Commentary
	Samples from RC and diamond core were considered representative and appropriate for the material sampled and for use in a resource estimate
Drilling techniques	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). RC drilling was completed with a 139mm diameter face sampling hammer. A single RC hole was extended with diamond drilling NQ2 from 148.9m to 262m using a standard 3m tube. Diamond drill core was routinely orientated, generally every 3m run down hole with a Reflex Act III orientation tool.
Drill sample recovery	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Some RC samples were wet and minor sample loss occurred in the first 20m of drilling due to cavities and a perched aquifer near the resource area. This has affected less than 4% of samples collected. Sample recovery and quality was otherwise good once drilling advanced past the perched aquifer.
	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. The rig cyclone and splitter were regularly cleaned throughout each drill hole and thoroughly cleaned after intervals of significant clay and water. RC sample recovery was visually assessed with recovery, moisture and contamination recorded into a logging template. Sample weights were regularly checked using a spring scale. Diamond drill core recovery is recorded at the time of drilling and marked on core blocks downhole. Recovery was excellent with less than 1% of core lost downhole.
	Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. RC sample recoveries were good other than through cavities in the upper 20m of drilling in select holes. These zones have been recorded and will be factored into any intercept calculations performed. No significant bias has been observed in the mineralised zone. No bias is observed in diamond core as there was no loss of core through sampled intervals.

6

Criteria	JORC Code explanation Commentary
Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. All drill chips were geologically logged on site by geologists following the CAZ logging scheme. With all recorded information loaded to a database and validated.
	Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. Logging is qualitative with colour, lithology, texture, mineralogy, mineralization, alteration, core photos and other features.
	The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. All drill holes were logged in full
Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. NQ2 core was cut in half using an Almonte diamond blade saw. Half was sent for assay, half kept for archival.
	If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. 1 metre RC drill samples fall through a riffle splitter directly below the rig mounted cyclone. A 2-3 kg sample is collected in a pre-numbered calico bag and lined up in rows with the corresponding bulk 1 metre sample pile.
	For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. All drill samples are dried, crushed and pulverised to achieve an average of 85% passing 75µm and all samples are considered appropriate for this technique
	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Duplicate field sample composites were collected in RC drilling at the rate of 1 sample per hole.
	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Appropriate sampling protocols were used during RC composite sampling. This included spear collection at various angles through bulk 1 metre sample piles to maximize representivity. Second half sampling of diamond core is not routinely performed
	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. Sample sizes (2kg to 3kg) are considered to be of a sufficient size to accurately represent any base metal mineralisation (massive sulphides and supergene enrichment). Field duplicates have been collected to ensure monitoring of the sub-sampling quality.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. Samples were sent for analysis to a commercial independent laboratory in Perth. All RC and diamond core samples were analysed for: • Fire Assay using a 50g charge finished by ICP-AES to analyse for

7

Criteria	JORC Code explanation Commentary
	Au-Pt-Pd. • Four Acid Digest to analyse a 47- element suite with an ICP-OES/MS finish which offers a near total dissolution.
	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. No geophysical instruments were used during the drill campaign.
	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. Field duplicate samples and standards were submitted with each sample batch at a rate of 1 per hole. The laboratory inserted standards, blanks and duplicate samples. Results are within tolerable limits
Verification of sampling and assaying	The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. All data has been checked internally by senior CAZ staff
	The use of twinned holes. No twinned holes were drilled during the quarter
	Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Field data is collected using an excel spreadsheet with internal validation on a Toughbook computer. Data is also validated as it is loaded to a Datashed company database.
	Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No adjustments are made to assay data
Location of data points	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Collar positions were located with a handheld GPS (+5m). Down hole surveys were taken with a Reflex Ez-Trac tool every 30m down hole.
	Specification of the grid system used. All co-ordinates collected are in GDA94 – MGA Zone 52
	Quality and adequacy of topographic control. The topographic surface is determined from pre-existing digital elevation models and DGPS survey data.
Data spacing and distribution	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Holes were drilled on various grid spacings angled -50° to -90° to varying azimuths designed to drill perpendicular to the strike of mineralisation wherever possible due to drill access.
	Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of The data spacing and distribution is considered sufficient to demonstrate spatial

8

Criteria	JORC Code explanation Commentary
	geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. and grade continuity of the mineralised domains to support the definition of Inferred and Indicated Mineral Resources under the 2012 JORC code once all other modifying factors have been addressed
	Whether sample compositing has been applied. All samples are collected at 1m intervals. Samples are composited to 4m at the direction of the geologist outside of mineralised intervals for RC sampling. No compositing is applied to diamond core samples.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. Drilling on all projects is orientated to best suit the mineralisation to be closely perpendicular to both the strike and dip of the mineralisation. Intercepts are close to true width in most cases. Exceptions are where steep rocky outcrop has not allowed for clearing to allow optimal placement of a drill rig in a small number of holes.
	If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. It is not believed that drilling orientation has introduced a sampling bias.
Sample security	The measures taken to ensure sample security. Samples are securely sealed and stored onsite, until delivery to Perth laboratories via contract freight Transport. Chain of custody consignment notes and sample submission forms are sent with the samples. Sample submission forms are also emailed to the laboratory and are used to keep track of the sample batches.
Audits or reviews	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No external audits on sampling techniques and data have been completed. A review of QAQC data has been carried out by company geologists

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	Type, reference name/number, location	The Mount Angelo North Project is located
tenement and	and ownership including agreements or	on M80/0247 a 41.59 hectare tenement
land tenure	material issues with third parties such as	granted on 31/05/1988. Normal Western
status	joint ventures, partnerships, overriding	Australian State royalties apply. In
	royalties, native title interests, historical

9

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	sites, wilderness or national park and		addition, a NSR of 1.5% to Squadron
	environmental settings.		Resources Pty Ltd.
	The security of the tenure held at the time
	of reporting along with any known
	impediments to obtaining a licence to
	operate in the area.
Exploration	Acknowledgment and appraisal of		Intermittent exploration from 1972 and
done by other	exploration by other parties.		2005has been carried out by Kennecott,
parties			Newmont, North Broken Hill, Asarco
			Australia, BP Minerals, RTZ Mining and
			Anglo Australian Resources NL. Work
			defined several small base metals
			occurrences to the south west of Halls
			Creek which were subjected to drilling,
			geophysics surveys and geochemical
			sampling programs. More recently, 3D
			Resources and Cazaly Resources have
			conducted targeted exploration utilising
			airborne geophysics, ground geophysics,
			RC and diamond drilling on the project
			area from 2008-2014 and in 2021.
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style		The Mount Angelo North Cu-Zn-Ag
	of mineralisation.		volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit is
			hosted within the Koongie Park formation,
			a sequence of felsic volcanics, argillic
			sediments, volcanoclastics and various
			intercalated chemical sediments. The
			Koongie Park Formation is centrally
			located within the Lamboo Complex
			consisting of Palaeoproterozoic plutonic
			rocks and volcanosedimentary sequence
			of the Halls Creek orogen.
Drill hole	A summary of all information material to		Refer to the body of the announcement
Information	the understanding of the exploration		and Appendix 2.
	results including a tabulation of the
	following information for all Material drill
	holes:
	o	easting and northing of the drill hole
		collar
	o	elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
		elevation above sea level in metres)
		of the drill hole collar
	o	dip and azimuth of the hole
	o	down hole length and interception
		depth
	o	hole length.
	If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the information
	is not	Material and this exclusion does not

10

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	detract from the understanding of the
	report, the Competent Person should
	clearly explain why this is the case.
Data	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	The Mount Angelo North reported
aggregation	averaging techniques, maximum and/or	intercepts include a minimum of 0.2% Cu
methods	minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of	over a minimum distance of 1m with a
	high grades) and cut-off grades are usually	maximum 2m or 4m consecutive internal
	Material and should be stated.	waste. No upper cuts have been applied.
	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate	All assay results above 0.2% Cu are
	short lengths of high grade results and	reported in Appendix 2.
	longer lengths of low grade results, the
	procedure used for such aggregation
	should be stated and some typical
	examples of such aggregations should be
	shown in detail.
	The assumptions used for any reporting of
	metal equivalent values should be clearly
	stated.
Relationship	These relationships are particularly	Holes were drilled from -50 to -90 on
between	important in the reporting of Exploration	various azimuths to drill perpendicular to
mineralisation	Results.	the orientation of mineralisation.
widths and intercept lengths	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	Mineralisation in the oxide zone at the northern end of the mineralised zone is sub-horizontal, with increasing depth the orientation of mineralisaton increases to
	If it is not known and only the down hole	approximately 50 degrees east.
	lengths are reported, there should be a
	clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down
	hole length, true width not known’).
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with	Refer to the body of the announcement.
	scales) and tabulations of intercepts
	should be included for any significant
	discovery being reported These should
	include, but not be limited to a plan view
	of drill hole collar locations and
	appropriate sectional views.
Balanced	Where comprehensive reporting of all	A list of all drill holes completed in June
reporting	Exploration Results is not practicable,	2021 area included in Appendix 2. All
	representative reporting of both low and	assay results above 0.2% Cu are reported,
	high grades and/or widths should be	and all assay results above 0.2% Zn are
	practiced to avoid misleading reporting of	reported as material. Assay results below
	Exploration Results.	0.2% are not considered material.
		The report is considered balanced and
		provided in context
Other	Other exploration data, if meaningful and	No other material exploration data to
substantive	material, should be reported including (but	report.
	not limited to): geological observations;

11

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
exploration	geophysical survey results; geochemical
data	survey results; bulk samples – size and
	method of treatment; metallurgical test
	results; bulk density, groundwater,
	geotechnical and rock characteristics;
	potential deleterious or contaminating
	substances.
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further	Drilling at Mount Angelo north will be fully
	work (eg tests for lateral extensions or	assessed following receipt of the diamond
	depth extensions or large-scale step-out	drill assays in the near term. Any
	drilling).	additional extensional / step out drilling
	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future	will be conducted if required and a resource estimation will be updated to meet JORC code standards 2012.
	drilling areas, provided this information is
	not commercially sensitive.

12

APPENDIX 2

Copper Intercepts reported above 0.2% with 4m maximum consecutive dilution.

Hole_ID	North	East	RL	Dip	Azi	Total Depth	From (m)	To (m)	Length (m)	Cu (%)	Pb (%)	Zn (%)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppm)
HCRC0054	7960726	340585	448	-60	300	131				No significant intercept
HCRC0055	7960642	340522	454	-60	285	95	1	37	36	1.08	0.15	0.59	8	0.07
HCRC0055							44	47	3	0.29	0.01	0.71	2	0.02
HCRC0055							54	68	14	1.98	0.04	0.32	15	0.14
HCRC0056	7960498	340436	441	-58	270	113	78	79	1	1.57	0.02	1.66	9	0.00
HCRC0056							95	103	8	0.55	0.00	0.08	1	0.02
HCRD0057	7960448	340541	447	-70	300	261.7				Assays awaited
HCRC0058	7960679	340503	450	-80	180	80	11	22	11	0.85	0.09	0.31	6	0.03
HCRC0058							39	73	34	2.48	0.02	0.68	13	0.19
HCRC0059	7960661	340502	450	-52	140	59	1	43	42	3.15	0.26	0.72	17	0.20
HCRC0060	7960683	340482	450	-90	0	40	5	11	6	1.65	0.08	1.99	18	0.13
HCRC0061	7960656	340466	450	-90	0	59	11	32	21	1.40	0.13	0.33	7	0.05

Zinc Intercepts reported above 0.2% with 4m maximum consecutive dilution.

Hole_ID	North	East	RL	Dip	Azi	Total Depth	From (m)	To (m)	Length (m)	Cu (%)	Pb (%)	Zn (%)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppm)
HCRC0054	7960726	340585	448	-60	300	131				No significant intercept
HCRC0055	7960642	340522	454	-60	285	95	2	23	21	0.78	0.22	0.92	9	0.04
HCRC0055							33	35	2	1.77	0.04	0.40	9	0.07
HCRC0055							44	55	11	0.24	0.01	0.37	1	0.03
HCRC0055							60	69	9	2.82	0.05	0.47	21	0.19
HCRC0056	7960498	340436	441	-58	270	113	78	79	1	1.57	0.02	1.66	9	0.00
HCRD0057	7960448	340541	447	-70	300	261.7				Assays awaited
HCRC0058	7960679	340503	450	-80	180	80	0	18	18	0.47	0.04	0.36	4	0.01
HCRC0058							23	24	1	0.05	0.01	0.22	1	0.01
HCRC0058							39	63	24	3.10	0.03	0.93	16	0.25
HCRC0059	7960661	340502	450	-52	140	59	0	32	32	0.61	0.31	0.92	13	0.16
HCRC0059							41	48	7	0.32	0.01	0.25	2	0.02
HCRC0059							52	56	4	0.04	0.00	0.21	-1	0.00
HCRC0060	7960683	340482	450	-90	0	40	0	40	40	0.26	0.02	0.53	3	0.02
HCRC0061	7960656	340466	450	-90	0	59	8	20	12	0.34	0.18	0.71	7	0.05
HCRC0061							30	48	18	0.19	0.02	0.42	1	0.01
HCRC0061							53	59	6	0.05	0.05	0.81	1	0.02

13