Pre-Annual General Meeting Information • May 23, 2025
Pre-Annual General Meeting Information
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer

(Incorporated in England and Wales with Registered No. 05718406)
Michel Meeus (Non-Executive Chairman) 6th Floor Fady Khallouf (Chief Executive Officer) Lillia Jolibois (Non-Executive Director) Gilbert Lehmann (Non-Executive Director) Charles Mack (Non-Executive Director) Thibaut de Gaudemar (Non-Executive Director)
Directors: Registered Office:
60 Gracechurch Street London EC3V 0HR
23 May 2025
To Shareholders,
I am writing to give you details of the Company's Annual General Meeting (AGM) to be held at 2:00 p.m. on 20 June 2025 at Huckletree Bishopsgate, 8 Bishopsgate, London EC2N 4BQ. The formal notice of the General Meeting is set out on page 3 of this document.
Following the announcement of the annual report and accounts for the period ended 31 December 2024 ("Annual Report and Accounts"), notice of the AGM (the "Notice") is set out on page 3 of this document. The Notice sets out the resolutions that shareholders are being asked to consider.
As per prior years the receipt of the Annual Report and Accounts, together with resolutions relating to the auditors and the re-election of directors will be considered and, if thought fit, approved at the AGM. Resolutions 1 to 10 are proposed in respect of these matters. In addition, resolutions 11 and 12 seek authority to allot shares and to disapply preemption rights and resolution 13 provides authority for the purchase of own shares.
Resolutions 15 to 22 relate to the election of directors proposed by one of the Company's shareholders, HSBC Global Custody Nominee (UK) Limited ("HSBC"). HSBC is said to hold the relevant shares as nominee for HSBC Bank plc which in turn is said to hold shares for CACEIS Bank (a limited company registered in France) which in turn states it holds shares for CA Indosuez Wealth (Europe) (a limited company registered in Luxembourg) which in turn holds shares for an ultimate beneficial owner, Ms Veronique Salik. The purported notice proposing resolutions 15 to 22 was defective, and the Board is not therefore obliged to put forward the resolutions proposed therein. However, the Board has elected to do so in the interest of transparency and in order to ensure that matters are dealt with as efficiently as possible.
In accordance with section 314 of the Companies Act 2006 a statement from HSBC is set out within an appendix at the end of this document (the "Statement"). The Statement is put forward by HSBC as nominee at the request of CACEIS Bank on behalf of Ms Salik and, as endorsed on the statement, HSBC state that it does not accept any responsibility for the content of the Statement.
Resolutions 15 to 18 will only be put to the meeting if resolutions 3 and 6 to 8 are passed as they will otherwise have no effect as Michel Meeus, Gilbert Lehmann, Charles Mack and Thibaut de Gaudemar will no longer be directors if not re-elected.
(i) The requisitioners claim that value of the recovery in the Proger dispute was overstated in the 2023 accounts, resulting in a loss in the 2024 accounts, notwithstanding which a bonus was awarded to Fady Khallouf, 50% of which was paid in shares in the Company
The value of the Proger Loan in the Company's 2023 accounts is correct because it had to be assessed on the basis of the information available at that time. The Company was engaged in several litigation procedures with Proger and an assessment of the "Loan at amortised cost" was based on the Loan Agreement, the expired Call Option and the legal assessment of the case.
The bonus for Mr Khallouf had been agreed by the shareholders at the AGM that took place in June 2021. The Company notes that Ms Salik and her father Pierre Salik voted in favor of this resolution.
Jacques Mahaux, who was the representative of the Salik family on the Board, agreed in 2021 with the pursuance of the litigation, and the attribution of the bonus.
Cadogan Energy Solutions plc, Registered Office Address: c/o Shakespeare Martineau, 6th Floor, 60 Gracechurch Street London, EC3V 0HR. Registration Number: 5718406. Registered in England and Wales.
(ii) The requisitioners have questioned whether the acquisition of shares by Mr Michel Meeus was approved by the board in advance of the settlement of the Proger dispute, and whether it concluded that the acquisition was in accordance with MAR and Part V of the Criminal Justice Act 1993
Michel Meeus anticipated his willingness to buy shares in the Company after the release of the announcement on the settlement agreement with Proger. Mr Meeus is non-executive, and he was not holding any insider information when he did so. Mr Meeus purchased his shares on the Stock Exchange from people who had the relevant information and were willing to sell at prices with a significant premium compared to the previous months. Whilst the settlement agreement was signed at the time Mr Meeus acquired his shares, it was still conditional on receiving 10m euros from Proger before the end of January 2025, so there was no certainty on the outcome of this settlement, and no certainty on the end of the litigation.
(iii) The requisitioners claim that pointless legal action was pursued against Ms Salik and that the Company won on a technicality and is now pursuing costs against Ms Salik, which Ms Salik considers to be intimidation.
Ms Salik personally issued two notices to the Company on 15 November 2024. The notices required the company to provide information about an interest in shares under section 803 of the Companies Act ("the Act") and provide a copy of the company's register of members under section 116 of the Act ("the Requests"). The litigation pursued by the Company against Ms Salik was necessary as the Company was required to act, given the serious penalties imposed for companies who fail to respond adequately to such requests under the Act. The action was pursued in accordance with legal advice from the Company's solicitors and Counsel and the Company won on a substantive point of law, not a technicality.
The Court has confirmed that Ms Salik is not a member of the Company and accordingly had no entitlement to make a request under section 803 of the Act. The Court granted a declaration that the Company was not required to respond. Ms Salik was advised throughout the proceedings by a specialist corporate law firm but contested the proceedings brought by the Company to the final determination.
In light of the need to pursue the action against Ms Salik, which was found to be justified, the Company incurred costs which the Court ordered it was entitled to recover from Ms Salik. The Company has a duty to its members to seek to recover those costs. Costs recovery remain on going.
(iv) The requisitioners have stated that the request was resubmitted by HSBC (as nominee) on 4 December 2024 but the Company has not challenged or responded to the new notice.
The notice submitted by HSBC on 4 December 2024 is a different notice to that dealt with by the Court under (iii) above. Unlike the notice issued by Ms Salik, the Company is not required to take positive steps to challenge or respond to the notice under the Act. This notice was served on behalf of Ms Salik while the High Court proceedings were live and they remain open pending determination of costs. The Company, having taken legal advice, have reason to believe that the notice is defective but will be engaging with HSBC to identify the defect.
Shareholders can vote electronically via the Investor Centre app or by accessing the web browser at https://uk.investorcentre.mpms.mufg. com/. Whether or not you intend to be present at the Annual General Meeting, you are requested to submit a proxy appointment as soon as possible. Alternatively, you may request a hard copy Form of Proxy from MUFG Corporate Markets. To be valid, completed Forms of Proxy must be received by MUFG Corporate Markets, PXS 1, Central Square, 29 Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL not later than 2.00 p.m. on 18 June 2025. You are entitled to appoint a proxy to attend and to exercise all or any of your rights to vote and to speak at the Annual General Meeting instead of you. Submission of a proxy appointment will not preclude you from attending and voting at the Annual General Meeting in person if you so wish. Alternatively, you can vote via CREST or Proxymity (refer to the notes to the Notice of AGM).
If you plan to attend the AGM then due to security restrictions at the building you must register in advance by emailing the Company Secretary, [email protected], at least 48 hour prior to the meeting. Attendees will be issued with a QR code which will be required for access to the building. Without prior registration and a valid QR code entry to the building may be denied.
Resolutions 1 to 14 – The Board considers that the resolutions to be put to the Shareholders at the Annual General Meeting are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole. Your Board will be voting in favour of the resolutions and unanimously recommends that you do so as well.
Resolutions 15 to 22 – For the reasons set out above the Board considers that the resolutions are not in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole and therefore the Board will not be voting in favour of such resolutions. The Board strongly recommends that shareholders vote against resolutions 15 to 22.
Yours faithfully,
CEO
For and on behalf of the Board of Cadogan Energy Solutions plc
(formerly Cadogan Petroleum plc) (Incorporated in England and Wales with Registered number 05718406)
If you are in any doubt about the contents of this document or the action you should take, you are recommended to seek your own personal finance advice immediately from your stockbroker, bank manager, fund manager, solicitor, accountant or other appropriately qualified independent financial adviser authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 if you are in the United Kingdom, or from another appropriately authorised independent financial adviser if you are outside the United Kingdom.
If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your shares in Cadogan Energy Solutions plc, please send this document and the accompanying Annual Financial Report as soon as possible to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for transmission to the purchaser or transferee.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual General Meeting (the "AGM") of Cadogan Energy Solutions plc (the "Company") will be held at Huckletree Bishopsgate, 8 Bishopsgate, London EC2N 4BQ at 2.00 p.m. on Friday 20 June 2025 to consider and if thought fit, pass the following resolutions. Resolutions 1 to 11 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and resolutions 12 to 14 will be proposed as special resolutions.
such authority to expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting or, if earlier, the close of business on 30 September 2026, unless previously renewed, varied or revoked by the Company, save that the Company may make offers and enter into agreements before such authority expires which would, or might, require equity securities to be allotted after the authority expires and the Directors may allot equity securities under any such offer or agreement as if the authority had not expired.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD
B Harber Company Secretary
23 May 2025
Cadogan Energy Solutions plc is registered in England no 5718406 Registered Office: 60 Gracechurch Street London EC3V 0HR
Shareholders can vote electronically via the Investor Centre, a free app for smartphone and tablet provided by MUFG Corporate Markets (the company's registrar). It allows you to securely manage and monitor your shareholdings in real time, take part in online voting, keep your details up to date, access a range of information including payment history and much more. The app is available to download on both the Apple App Store and Google Play, or by scanning the relevant QR code below. Alternatively, you may access the Investor Centre via a web browser at: https://uk.investorcentre.mpms.mufg.com/.

Resolutions 1-11 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions requiring the approval of more than 50% of the votes cast at the meeting and Resolutions 12-14 will be proposed as special resolutions requiring the approval of at least 75% of the votes cast at the meeting.
Shareholders are being asked to receive the Annual Financial Report of the Company for the financial year ended 31 December 2024. The Annual Financial Report comprises the Annual Accounts of the Group including the Strategic Report, Directors' Report, Annual Report on Remuneration and the auditor's report on those Accounts and the auditable part of the Annual Report on Remuneration.
Resolution 2 seeks shareholders' authorisation to approve the Annual Report on Remuneration (excluding the part of the report, which sets out the Directors' Remuneration Policy) for the financial year ended 31 December 2024 as set out on pages 38 to 43 of the 2024 Annual Financial Report. It gives details of Directors' remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2024. Shareholders have an annual advisory vote on the report on Directors' remuneration.
Under the Company's Articles of Association, every Director must seek re-election by members at least once every three years. However, it is now the Board's practice for every Director to seek re-election by shareholders every year as recommended by the UK Corporate Governance Code. Accordingly, resolutions 3 to 8 deal with the re-election of each of the Company's Directors. Biographies of each of the Directors seeking re-election are set out in the Annual Financial Report 2024. All of the Directors proposed for re-election have wide ranging business knowledge, bringing valuable skills and experience and the Board considers that each of the Directors continues to make an effective, valuable contribution and demonstrate commitment to the role. Accordingly, the Board recommends the re-election of each of these Directors.
Resolution 9 seeks shareholders' authorisation to re-appoint Moore Kingston Smith LLP as the Company's auditor to hold office until the next Annual General Meeting of the Company. Resolution 10 seeks shareholders' authorisation for the Directors to determine the auditor's remuneration.
The Directors may allot or grant rights over ordinary shares only if authorised to do so by a resolution of shareholders. Resolution 11 seeks a new authority under section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 to authorise the Directors to allot shares or grant rights to subscribe for, or convert any security into, shares in the Company. It will expire at the conclusion of next year's AGM or, if earlier, on 30 September 2026. Resolution 11 follows institutional investor guidelines regarding the authority to allot shares. Paragraph (a) of resolution 11 would give the Directors authority to allot shares or grant rights to subscribe for, or convert any security into, shares ("Rights") up to a maximum nominal amount of £2,511,284.87, representing approximately one third of the Company's existing issued share capital as at 23 May 2025, being the latest practicable before the publication of this Notice. This maximum is reduced by the nominal amount of shares allotted or Rights granted pursuant to paragraph (b) of resolution 11 in excess of £2,441,284.87. Paragraph (b) of resolution 11 gives the Directors authority to allot shares or grant Rights in connection with a rights issue only up to a maximum nominal amount of £5,022,569.74 representing approximately two-thirds of the Company's existing issued share capital. This maximum is reduced by the nominal amount of shares allotted or Rights granted pursuant to paragraph (a) of resolution 11. Therefore, the maximum nominal amount of shares allotted or Rights granted under resolution 11 is £5,022,569.74, representing approximately twothirds of the Company's existing issued share capital. The Directors do not currently intend to use the authority set out in resolution 11. If they do use the authority set out in resolution 11, then they intend to follow best practice (including as regards standing for re-election in certain cases), as recommended by institutional investor guidelines. The Company holds (as at 23 May 2025, being the latest practicable date prior to the publication of this Notice) 66 Ordinary shares in treasury, representing 0.00002% of issued share capital.
If the Directors wish to allot any shares or grant rights over shares or sell treasury shares for cash (other than under an employee share scheme) they are required by the Companies Act 2006 to offer them to existing shareholders pro rata. In certain circumstances, it may be in the interests of the Company to raise capital without such a preemptive offer. Resolution 12 therefore seeks a waiver of shareholders' pre-emption rights and (aside from rights issues or other pro rata offers), the authority will be limited to the issue of securities for cash up to a maximum aggregate nominal value of £376,692.73 – approximately five per cent of the Company's issued ordinary share capital (as at 23 May 2025, being the latest practicable date prior to the publication of this Notice). The Directors confirm their intention to adhere to the provisions in the Pre-emption Group Statement of Principles regarding cumulative usage of authorities over more than 7.5 per cent of the Company's issued ordinary share capital in any three-year period. This resolution also seeks a disapplication of the pre-emption rights on a rights issue to permit such arrangements as may be appropriate to resolve legal or practical problems which, for example, might arise with overseas shareholders. The authority will expire at the conclusion of next year's AGM or, if earlier, on 30 September 2026. The Directors do not currently intend to use the authority set out in resolution 12.
The Company may wish to purchase its own shares and resolution 13 seeks authority to do so. If passed, the Company would be authorised to make market purchases up to a total of 25,112,848 shares – approximately ten per cent of the Company's issued ordinary share capital (as at 23 May 2025, being the latest practicable date prior to the publication of this Notice). The Directors will generally only exercise this power when the effect of such purchases is expected to increase earnings per share and will be in the best interests of shareholders generally. Shares purchased may be cancelled and the number in issue will be reduced accordingly. The Company may hold in treasury any of its own shares that it purchases in this manner. The authority will expire at the conclusion of next year's AGM or, if earlier, on 30 September 2026.
The purpose of resolution 14 is to allow the Company to continue to call general meetings (other than AGMs) on not less than 14 clear days' notice. The Directors do not expect to use this power unless urgent action is required on the part of the shareholders. If resolution 14 is passed, the approval will be effective until the Company's next AGM when it is expected that a similar resolution will be proposed. It should be noted that, in order to be able to call a general meeting on less than 21 clear days' notice, the Company must make a means of electronic voting available to all shareholders for that meeting.
The requisitioners have provided a statement which is appended to this letter setting out the basis for Resolutions 15 to 22.

This statement is put forward by us as nominee and at the request of CACEIS for the beneficial shareholder Ms Salik and without any responsibility by us as nominee for the contents.
By law this statement can only be 1,000 words so it is necessarily brief. The reasons for proposing the board changes are set out below.
Ms Salik has lost confidence in the overall performance and governance of the Board. She believes that removing four non-executive directors (one of them having served lengthy terms of office) and appointing three new independent directors is in the best interests of the Company.
On 13 December 2024, the Company announced it had settled the Proger dispute for €10 million. The Company valued the loan recovery at \$17.1 million in the 2023 Accounts. This estimated recovery was clearly materially overstated and has resulted in a loss in the 2024 Accounts. Despite this disastrous outcome, the Board awarded Mr Khallouf bonus, 50% of which was paid in shares in the Company.
On the same day, Mr Michel Meeus, acquired 12,433,651 shares, followed in the next 10 days by 3 other purchases of ordinary shares; the entire transaction represented therefore approximately 6% of the capital of the Company. Afterwards, Mr Meeus held in total 10.65% of the Company. Did the Company's Board approve this dealing by Mr Meeus in advance, and conclude that it was in accordance with MAR and Part V of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 given his knowledge of the settlement announced the same day as his first purchase?
Ms Salik proposed board changes at the last AGM, which did not succeed. The outcome of the vote was determined by shareholders, but it is not clear who the underlying beneficial owners are. Ms Salik sought information about the underlying beneficial owners of shares and a copy of the register of members in the hope that this would reveal who is controlling the Company.
Company funds and resources were used to pursue a pointless legal action against Ms Salik on the basis that since she was not a registered shareholder she was not entitled to this information, despite it being obvious that she is a shareholder as is disclosed on the Company's own website. The Company won on a technicality and is now pursuing costs against Ms Salik. Ms Salik considers this to be intimidation.
Ms Salik had the request re-submitted by us (as nominee) on 4 December 2024 which holds the shares as nominee for Ms Salik, but despite several months passing the Company has not challenged or responded to the new notice. Why does the Company fear transparency and refuse to comply with the Companies Act?
Ms Salik has made repeated requests to raise concerns regarding the stewardship of the Company and the impact on the value of her investment. Ms Salik accepts the situation in Ukraine is difficult but does not consider the Company is being run in the best interests of shareholders.
Ms Salik has proposed the removal of the following directors for the reasons given below:
To remedy the situation Ms Salik is proposing three new directors whose attributes are given below. We urge shareholders to vote in favour the resolutions.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.