AI assistant
CABOT CORP — Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2006
Feb 23, 2006
31161_rns_2006-02-24_e8bb2f49-0324-4c77-8679-670c8e43b4fa.zip
Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
DEFA14A 1 b59389ccdefa14a.htm CABOT CORPORATION defa14a PAGEBREAK
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
| o Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
| --- |
| o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| o Definitive Proxy
Statement |
| þ Definitive
Additional Materials |
| o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
CABOT CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| þ | No fee required. |
|---|---|
| o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5) Total fee paid:
| o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|---|---|
| o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by |
| Exchange Act | |
| Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid | |
| previously. Identify the previous filing by registration | |
| statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its | |
| filing. |
1) Amount Previously Paid:
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3) Filing Party:
4) Date Filed:
PAGEBREAK
February 23, 2006
Dear Stockholder:
Your vote at Cabots upcoming Annual Meeting is important. Please take a moment to read this letter and vote.
Cabots 2006 Annual Meeting will be held on March 9 th and four proposals require a vote of stockholders. Proposal 1 is the election of four directors to the Board of Directors, Proposal 2 is to ratify the choice of the Companys auditor, Proposal 3 is for approval of our 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, an equity compensation plan which will be used primarily to issue long-term incentive awards to employees (the 2006 Plan), and Proposal 4 is for approval of a new plan for equity compensation for non-employee directors. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR all four proposals.
Our proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting describes our compensation philosophy and the basic principles we follow in paying those employees who participate in our long-term incentive compensation program. This letter further shares our thoughts on why we believe you should vote in favor of the 2006 Plan.
We rely on purchase restricted stock as our primary long-term incentive to encourage participants to think like shareholders. We believe this is vital to your companys success and the fulfillment of our corporate strategy for delivering stockholder value. The 2006 Plan is similar operationally to the equity compensation plans we have had in place, and that have been approved by our shareholders, since the early 1990s. We believe you should vote FOR the 2006 Plan for the following reasons:
| | Cabots 5 and 10 year stock performance compares favorably to relevant indices. We
believe this is due in large part to our equity compensation plan, which has been in
place over these periods, and the incentive it provides to participants to focus on the
Companys long-term performance and value creation activities.
We believe the plans effectiveness is demonstrated by the development and growth of our former Cabot
Microelectronics business, and today, by our inkjet colorants and cesium formate
businesses. |
| --- | --- |
| | The upfront purchase requirement that is unique to our program requires a financial
investment by participants, like the investment in the Company made by our shareholders.
No other form of compensation provides as strong an alignment of interests between
stockholders and employees. |
| | Equity is awarded deep into employee ranks. Nearly 300 employees globally,
representing approximately 7% of our total workforce, participate in the long-term
incentive compensation program. The program has not been used to provide excessive
compensation for executives. Indeed, historically, only 25% of the total awards made in
a year have been issued to our executive officers. Actual share usage in 2003, 2004 and
2005 was 2.3%, 2.4% and 1.8%, respectively, of total shares outstanding. |
PAGEBREAK
| | The 2006 Plan passes Institutional Investor Servicess (ISS) widely-used
mathematical model (Shareholder Value Transfer), which is used by many sophisticated,
institutional investors. |
| --- | --- |
| | The 2006 Plan only fails the ISS burn rate test. The primary reasons the 2006 Plan
fails the burn rate test are: |
| | The depth of the participant group. |
|---|---|
| | The burn rate test is a new test and is not easily adapted to the terms of |
| our purchase restricted stock. | |
| | ISS applies to Cabot the materials industry burn rate, which has the |
| second lowest burn rate of all of the industry burn rates used by ISS. | |
| Further, in calculating Cabots burn rate, ISS counts each share of purchase | |
| restricted stock issued as the issuance of four options. We believe applying | |
| a 1-for-4 ratio is inappropriate, and that the materials industry is not the | |
| proper industry classification for our business model. In order to continue | |
| to create new businesses, such as inkjet colorants, our equity compensation | |
| needs to be competitive with the industries in which these new businesses | |
| operate, where equity compensation is broadly used and makes up a meaningful | |
| portion of total compensation. |
While we were disappointed in the Companys financial performance in 2005, we do not believe it is appropriate to dramatically change a long-term incentive program because of short-term performance.
A culture of employee ownership has long been a hallmark at Cabot. Your vote in favor of the 2006 Plan will allow us to continue to make grants of purchase restricted stock to a broad base of employees.
Your vote is important. Please vote. We hope you can support us by voting FOR the 2006 Plan.
Sincerely,
Kennett F. Burnes
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer