Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

CABOT CORP Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2006

Feb 23, 2006

31161_rns_2006-02-24_e8bb2f49-0324-4c77-8679-670c8e43b4fa.zip

Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

DEFA14A 1 b59389ccdefa14a.htm CABOT CORPORATION defa14a PAGEBREAK

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

| o Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
| --- |
| o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| o Definitive Proxy
Statement |
| þ Definitive
Additional Materials |
| o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |

CABOT CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5) Total fee paid:

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.

1) Amount Previously Paid:

2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3) Filing Party:

4) Date Filed:

PAGEBREAK

February 23, 2006

Dear Stockholder:

Your vote at Cabot’s upcoming Annual Meeting is important. Please take a moment to read this letter and vote.

Cabot’s 2006 Annual Meeting will be held on March 9 th and four proposals require a vote of stockholders. Proposal 1 is the election of four directors to the Board of Directors, Proposal 2 is to ratify the choice of the Company’s auditor, Proposal 3 is for approval of our 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, an equity compensation plan which will be used primarily to issue long-term incentive awards to employees (the “2006 Plan”), and Proposal 4 is for approval of a new plan for equity compensation for non-employee directors. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR all four proposals.

Our proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting describes our compensation philosophy and the basic principles we follow in paying those employees who participate in our long-term incentive compensation program. This letter further shares our thoughts on why we believe you should vote in favor of the 2006 Plan.

We rely on purchase restricted stock as our primary long-term incentive to encourage participants to think like shareholders. We believe this is vital to your company’s success and the fulfillment of our corporate strategy for delivering stockholder value. The 2006 Plan is similar operationally to the equity compensation plans we have had in place, and that have been approved by our shareholders, since the early 1990s. We believe you should vote FOR the 2006 Plan for the following reasons:

| • | Cabot’s 5 and 10 year stock performance compares favorably to relevant indices. We
believe this is due in large part to our equity compensation plan, which has been in
place over these periods, and the incentive it provides to participants to focus on the
Company’s long-term performance and value creation activities.
We believe the plan’s effectiveness is demonstrated by the development and growth of our former Cabot
Microelectronics business, and today, by our inkjet colorants and cesium formate
businesses. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The upfront purchase requirement that is unique to our program requires a financial
investment by participants, like the investment in the Company made by our shareholders.
No other form of compensation provides as strong an alignment of interests between
stockholders and employees. |
| • | Equity is awarded deep into employee ranks. Nearly 300 employees globally,
representing approximately 7% of our total workforce, participate in the long-term
incentive compensation program. The program has not been used to provide excessive
compensation for executives. Indeed, historically, only 25% of the total awards made in
a year have been issued to our executive officers. Actual share usage in 2003, 2004 and
2005 was 2.3%, 2.4% and 1.8%, respectively, of total shares outstanding. |

PAGEBREAK

| • | The 2006 Plan passes Institutional Investor Services’s (“ISS”) widely-used
mathematical model (Shareholder Value Transfer), which is used by many sophisticated,
institutional investors. |
| --- | --- |
| • | The 2006 Plan only fails the ISS burn rate test. The primary reasons the 2006 Plan
fails the burn rate test are: |

• The depth of the participant group.
• The burn rate test is a new test and is not easily adapted to the terms of
our purchase restricted stock.
• ISS applies to Cabot the “materials” industry burn rate, which has the
second lowest burn rate of all of the industry burn rates used by ISS.
Further, in calculating Cabot’s burn rate, ISS counts each share of purchase
restricted stock issued as the issuance of four options. We believe applying
a 1-for-4 ratio is inappropriate, and that the materials industry is not the
proper industry classification for our business model. In order to continue
to create new businesses, such as inkjet colorants, our equity compensation
needs to be competitive with the industries in which these new businesses
operate, where equity compensation is broadly used and makes up a meaningful
portion of total compensation.

• While we were disappointed in the Company’s financial performance in 2005, we do not believe it is appropriate to dramatically change a long-term incentive program because of short-term performance.

A culture of employee ownership has long been a hallmark at Cabot. Your vote in favor of the 2006 Plan will allow us to continue to make grants of purchase restricted stock to a broad base of employees.

Your vote is important. Please vote. We hope you can support us by voting FOR the 2006 Plan.

Sincerely,

Kennett F. Burnes

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer