Annual Report (ESEF) • Jun 6, 2024
Preview not available for this file type.
Download Source FileEvery connection tells a story
The connections you make create a picture of modern life in the digital world.
One Petabyte is one million Gigabytes. With 94,722Pb, you could stream ‘Barbie’ over 7.2 billion times. In 4K quality.
a Petabytes consumed is for calendar year 2023.
We have more than 19,500 mobile sites across the UK, including 1,350 new mast sites built from scratch since 2013. That’s a brand new site every three days over the past decade.
Adding over 60,000 square miles of 4G mobile coverage across the UK since 2013. That’s more than 60% of the UK.
Our 5G infrastructure has increased average download speed by 121% since 2019.
You spent 1.5 billion minutes talking on voice and video calls with our EE mobile network in the last ten years. That is nearly 3,000 years of talking.
You helped create more of these record peaks in network traffic than ever.
To explore a year in the life of our customers and colleagues, visit our online review. bt.com/annualreview
Our network enables millions of customers to make trillions of connections between the people, places and things that matter most to them. Each connection carries data. And it creates data too. We’ve collated it here to reveal a year in the life of customers who’ve never relied on us more. The video calls that bring families together. The unbroken streams of shows and sports. The games, apps, deliveries and chats. Fixed or mobile, at home, work or play, our growing network makes these connections happen. And we have the storytelling stats to show it.
We operate more than 19,500 mobile sites across the UK, including 1,350 brand new mast sites built since 2013. That’s a new mobile site being built every three days for the past decade to elevate the UK’s mobile connectivity.
We’re building our new full fibre network across the UK, from rural villages to city centres, with 13.8m premises covered, equivalent to over 40% of UK homes and businesses already able to access ultrafast, ultra-reliable broadband. We’re reaching more properties every day – including one million just in the final quarter.
This map is a visual representation of network coverage and should not be taken as 100% accurate.
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issued Capital | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Merger Reserve | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Issued Capital | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Merger Reserve | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Issued Capital | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Merger Reserve | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Issued Capital | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Merger Reserve | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Issued Capital | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Merger Reserve | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Issued Capital | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Merger Reserve | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Issued Capital | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Merger Reserve | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
GBP - xbrli:shares
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before Specific Items | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Specific Items | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Before Specific Items | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Specific Items | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Issued Capital | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Share Premium | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Treasury Shares | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Other Reserves | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
| Retained Earnings | 213,800 | 213,800 | 213,800 |
Section 196
Building Connecting Accelerating
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
Revenue £20.8bn 1% (FY23: £20.7bn)
Profit before tax £1.2bn (31)% (FY23: £1.7bn)
Adjusted EBITDA £8.1bn 2% (FY23: £7.9bn)
Cash flow from operating activities £6.0bn (11)% (FY23: £6.7bn)
Normalised free cash flow £1.3bn (4)% (FY23: £1.3bn)
Basic earnings per share 8.7p (55)% (FY23: 19.4p)
Capital expenditure £4.9bn (3)% (FY23: £5.1bn)
This Strategic report was approved by the Board on 15 May 2024 and signed on its behalf by the Chairman.
Adam Crozier
Chairman
15 May 2024
You can find our cautionary statement on forward-looking statements on page 234. Pages 1 to 82 are the Strategic report. It includes our business model, progress against our strategic framework, our key performance indicators, group performance and our principal risks and uncertainties. You can find our Corporate governance report on pages 83 to 130. It includes the Directors’ report and information on our directors’ remuneration. When we say ‘BT Group’ and ‘the group’ in this document we mean BT Group plc – made up of our subsidiaries, customer-facing units and internal corporate units. When we say ‘FY24’ we mean the financial year that ended on 31 March 2024, and we use the same approach for any other years.
Look out for these throughout the report
Reference to another page in the report
Reference to further reading online
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
1
a Adjusted EBITDA is group profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures. See page 232.
b We define normalised free cash flow on page 232.
Connecting the UK while transforming our business. BT Group has made good progress in the last few years and yet we still have an enormous transformation ahead of us if we’re to truly modernise the way we operate for the benefit of all our stakeholders. As our investment expenditure reduces and as Allison’s leadership brings renewed focus and accelerated delivery, I’m confident that the long-term prospects for BT Group are extremely strong.
Adam Crozier
Chairman
The connections that we provide are more critical than ever, and our customers’ needs and demands are constantly evolving. Keeping the UK’s homes, public services and businesses connected places a huge responsibility on BT Group – one that we’ve continued to meet successfully in FY24, while sustainably growing our business and continuing to transform our operations. We’ve also achieved this while facing significant change across the organisation, including the appointment of our new Chief Executive.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
2
After five years as Chief Executive of BT Group, Philip Jansen stood down at the end of January 2024. Philip achieved a huge amount during his time, most notably setting our vision to provide full fibre connections to 25m premises across the UK by December 2026 – a target we are well over halfway towards completing. Philip’s tenure was also marked by a number of exceptional external challenges. Covid-19 caused immediate changes to everyday life and lasting shifts in how businesses and society operate, and BT Group successfully adapted to both under Philip’s leadership. He also steered the business through the impacts of events such as the cost-of-living crisis, high inflation rates and the invasion of Ukraine. I’d like to take the opportunity to again thank Philip personally, and on behalf of the Board, for everything he delivered for BT Group and the foundation he’s set for our future success. I wish him all the best with his future endeavours.
In February 2024, we welcomed Allison Kirkby as our new Chief Executive. She is a proven leader, with deep sector experience and a history of transforming businesses. Having served as a member of our Board since 2019, Allison already has a full understanding of our long-term strategic objectives. On the following pages, she sets out how she’s shaping this strategy to deliver for our customers and stakeholders better and faster. This will be achieved by focusing on building and connecting customers to our networks, and accelerating the transformation of BT Group to improve our customer service and for the benefit of all our stakeholders. The Board and I look forward to supporting this agenda and Allison’s leadership in her new executive capacity.
We’ve steadily accelerated the delivery of our unprecedented investment programme, creating the UK’s digital backbone and enabling growth in its economy and businesses. Building and connecting faster hastens the delivery of returns to our shareholders. FY24 is the year in which we passed the peak of our capital expenditure on this programme, enabling us to see greater normalised free cash flow over the coming years. This gives us confidence to increase the full year dividend to 8.0 pence per share while reaffirming our progressive dividend policy for our loyal investors.
While change both inside and outside BT Group is now constant, our purpose endures: We Connect for Good. Our network investments, alongside our Manifesto commitments to deliver responsible, inclusive and sustainable technology, create a foundation for greater inclusivity and wider benefits to society. We’re committed to ensuring that the networks we provide, and the essential services they enable, are accessed and utilised as widely as possible across the UK. In 2021, we set an ambitious goal to reach 25m people in the UK with digital skills by March 2026, and we’re on track to hit that target. We also continue to move forward on our wider sustainability goals, with a commitment to build towards a circular BT Group by the end of March 2030, and a circular tech ecosystem by end of March 2040. We’ve continued to make clear progress on reducing our environmental impact, with a 61% reduction in operational carbon emissions intensity (compared to FY17 levels) – but we want to go further too, both in our own operations but also within the wider ecosystem we enable. That’s why we’ve set a target to achieve net zero carbon emissions in our operations by the end of March 2031, and for supply chain and customer carbon emissions by the end of March 2041.
The massive investments we’ve been making, amid highly challenging economic conditions and constantly increasing data usage and demand, have created inflationary pressures on our business. This has an unavoidable impact on the prices we must charge our customers. We know these rises are never welcome, which is why it’s critical that the rationale behind them is fully explained and understood. Our Consumer business was the first in the industry to incorporate Ofcom’s latest proposals on pricing, moving to a ‘pounds and pence’ structure so that customers have a clear view of costs across their contracted period. We’ve also continued to protect our social tariff and pay as you go customers from price increases, to ensure everyone is able to remain online. We’re engaging with a broad range of stakeholders, including Ofcom, UK Government, the Digital Voice Advisory Board and Telecare Action Board, as we progress the switch from analogue to digital landlines. Along with other communications providers, we paused all non-voluntary migrations in December 2023, and we now expect to have migrated all customers off the public switched telephone network (PSTN) by the end of January 2027, allowing us to align the programme with full fibre broadband customer upgrades where available. This timescale will ensure we get this right while delivering this essential programme to ensure the long-term resilience of our networks and services.
In January 2024 we welcomed Raphael Kübler, Chief Operating Officer at Deutsche Telekom, to our Board. Raphael replaced Adel Al-Saleh as Deutsche Telekom’s nominated Board representative, and we look forward to working with him going forward. In May of this year we also welcomed Tushar Morzaria to the Board as an Independent Non-Executive Director. Tushar brings a wealth of strategic financial management experience gained over 25 years of overseeing transformation programmes and strengthening risk and control frameworks in complex global organisations. Ian Cheshire and Iain Conn stepped down from the BT Group Board in July 2023, with Ruth Cairnie succeeding them in the roles of both Senior Independent Non- Executive Director and Chair of the Remuneration Committee. I’m confident that the collective expertise and varied backgrounds of our Board members mean we have the right range of skills and experience to progress BT Group’s ambitions, while also meeting best practice and the guidelines set out in our Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy.
BT Group has made good progress in the last few years and yet we still have an enormous transformation ahead of us if we are to truly modernise the way we operate for the benefit of all our stakeholders.# BT Group plc
While we’ve a long way to go, our strategy is beginning to deliver, creating the next generation networks that connect the UK, while seeing clear improvements in operational efficiency and financial returns. As our investment expenditure reduces and as Allison’s leadership brings renewed focus and accelerated delivery, I’m confident that the long-term prospects for BT Group are extremely strong.
Adam Crozier
Chairman
15 May 2024
Since her appointment as Chief Executive, Allison has visited BT Group sites across the UK, including:
BT Group built and connected customers to our next generation networks at record speed and efficiency over the past year, while continuing to grow revenue and EBITDA.
Allison Kirkby
Chief Executive
Watch our CEO reflect on her first few months in office.
bt.com/annualreview
Full fibre rollout: now at 13.8m premises
13.8m
Normalised free cash flow: raising targets to c.£3.0bn by 2030
c.£3.0bn
Sharpening our focus on being the best we can be for our customers, for our shareholders and for the UK.
I’ve spent the last few months meeting as many of our customers and stakeholders as possible. Every interaction has confirmed to me that connectivity is the lifeblood of the UK’s society and economy. We provide the digital backbone for the nation; without us, life as we know it stops. That might sound dramatic, but it’s true – and it’s why everything we do has to be focused on supporting the customers who rely on us and living up to our purpose, to connect for good.
I’ve now visited close to 20 BT Group sites in the UK to meet with colleagues across our operations, and it’s been fantastic to see their commitment and passion for what we do. As they’re the people who connect with our customers most often, hearing their perspectives on our strengths, opportunities and challenges has also been invaluable as I’ve shaped my thinking.
These conversations have deepened my appreciation of the fantastic assets that make us unique. We’re unrivalled in our experience of operating critical national infrastructure, our breadth of private and public sector customer relationships, our research and development credentials, our partnerships with the world’s leading technology firms, and above all our brilliant people who underpin everything we do. We must harness these strengths as we move into the next phase of BT Group’s transformation.
We’re over the peak of our investment in fibre-to-the-premises (‘FTTP’ or ‘full fibre’); take-up of 5G and FTTP is growing; and we’re seeing higher customer satisfaction across the business as our networks and services provide ever- improving experiences. But we can and must go faster in utilising the full power of our networks. We’ll do this by sharpening our focus on being the best we can be for our customers, for our shareholders and for the UK.
Over the past year we delivered a solid operating and financial performance, with growth in both adjusted revenue and EBITDA. We passed peak capex on our full fibre broadband rollout and achieved £3bn of annualised cost savings a year ahead of schedule. This means we’ve now reached the inflection point where we emerge from the most capital-intensive phase of our investment programme. It also gives us the confidence to provide new guidance that significantly increases our short-term cash flow and sets out a path to more than double our normalised free cash flow over the next five years. This enhanced cash flow allows us to increase our dividend for FY24 by 3.9% to 8.0 pence per share. We’re also setting an additional £3bn of gross annualised cost savings to be reached by the end of FY29. I know BT Group’s share price has underperformed in recent years, but we now have a clear, positive path that aims to drive significant value for all stakeholders going forward.
Our full fibre rollout has delivered the UK’s largest private national infrastructure programme, on time and on budget. It will deliver huge benefits to the UK, with nationwide full fibre broadband predicted to increase national GDP by £72bn – or about 2% – by 2030. We’ve built at record speed and efficiency this past year, with an additional 3.5m premises passed, taking us to 13.8m premises covered – equivalent to well over 40% of UK homes. In fact, we’re currently the fastest builder of fibre anywhere in Europe, and at a lower cost than our major competitors in the UK.
More importantly, we’re also seeing industry-leading customer take up of our FTTP networks at 34% – and this is even stronger where we built two or more years ago, with take up of over 50%. We’ve continued our rollout of 5G, which now covers 75% of the UK population, and grown our 5G-ready customer base to 11m. Our overall mobile network has increased to 88% of the UK by geography, including new mobile connectivity in 33 London Underground stations. We’re also the only network provider to have hit our Shared Rural Network commitment to Government, bringing mobile coverage to many parts of the country for the first time.
The customer experience uplift is evident from the scale of traffic increase that we see when new locations are connected. In remote parts of Scotland, for example, we have seen this drive new commerce for businesses, enable people to use online services for the first time, and connect emergency services in the most remote locations.
We’re not just providing brilliant fixed and mobile networks – we’re also combining them with the key services our customers need to live, work, game and learn. For example, we launched EE Fibre 1.6Gbps, offering the fastest home broadband speeds of any major provider, and a new EE TV app and set-top box, fully integrated with Apple TV 4K. For businesses, we announced Global Fabric, which will enable organisations to seamlessly and securely connect to multiple clouds and seize the advantages of digital automation and artificial intelligence (AI), and we’ve also launched new customer solutions via collaborations with companies such as Google, SAP and Microsoft. These are reflected in strong customer satisfaction metrics across the business, and external accolades such as EE being named as RootMetrics’ number 1 mobile network for the 21st time.
Having passed peak capex on our full fibre broadband rollout and achieved our £3bn cost and service transformation programme a year ahead of schedule, we’ve now reached the inflection point on our long-term strategy.
To deliver long-term sustainable growth, we’ve set ourselves five priorities within our overall strategic framework:
As we move into the next phase of BT Group’s transformation, we are sharpening our focus to be better for our customers and the country, by accelerating the modernisation of our operations, and by exploring options to optimise our global business.
This year’s Annual Report provides many more examples of how our long-term strategy is delivering: we’re building and connecting our customers to next generation networks at pace; we’re creating standout customer experiences; and we’re leading the way to a bright and sustainable future.
While building our next generation IT and network infrastructure, we’re proactively moving customers off legacy platforms that don’t deliver the full benefits of digital connectivity. We recently completed the sunsetting of our 3G mobile network, and we’re continuing to move customers onto digital IP-based services. We now expect to have completed this shift by January 2027.
We are also radically simplifying our product and customer journeys by partnering with leading technology players and responsibly adopting new technologies such as AI to enable customer benefits and business growth. In October, we launched our new integrated EE digital platform to drive convergence. This included new connectivity propositions, building on our FTTP and 5G leadership, improved products and services and a simpler, better set of customer journeys. Overall this is driving a better customer experience, with those that have migrated showing a higher rate of convergence and NPS.
Our strategy is delivering, and when BT Group wins, the UK wins. But the world around us is moving at pace, and so must we.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
The Executive Committee is chaired by the Chief Executive. So that there is a single point of accountability, the Chief Executive (or a delegate) takes all the decisions. The Executive Committee provides input and recommendations to help the Chief Executive:
– develop group strategy and budget for Board approval
– execute the strategy once the Board approves it
– assure the Board on overall performance and how we’re managing risks.
Chief Executive
Appointed Chief Executive February 2024. Appointed to the Board March 2019. From May 2020 until becoming BT Group Chief Executive, Allison was President & CEO of Telia Company. She was previously President & Group CEO of TDC Group until October 2019, and President & Group CEO of Tele2 AB from 2015 to 2018, having been Tele2 AB’s Group CFO from 2014.
Chief Financial Officer
Appointed July 2016. Simon was CFO of BG Group before the takeover by Royal Dutch Shell in February 2016. Before that he was CFO of AstraZeneca, and Finance Director and Executive Director of ScottishPower. Simon was also previously a Director of McKinsey & Company.
The following changes to the Executive Committee took place during the year:
– Philip Jansen stood down as Chief Executive.
– Allison Kirkby was appointed as Chief Executive.
– Ed Petter stood down as Corporate Affairs Director on leaving BT Group.
– Tom Engel was appointed Corporate Affairs Director (Interim).
Chief Digital and Innovation Officer
Appointed March 2021. Harmeen is a global leader in incubating new businesses and creating revenue streams, with over 25 years’ experience of digital transformation and running technology-led businesses. Before joining BT Group, Harmeen was group CIO and Head of Cloud & Security business at Bharti Airtel. Before that, she was CIO at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, BBVA and HSBC. Harmeen is a Non-Executive Director of Lloyds Banking Group, and a board member of TM Forum.
Corporate Affairs Director (Interim)
Appointed December 2023. Before BT Group, Tom held communications leadership positions at DFID, DWP and the Natural History Museum. He has worked in the UK and South African parliaments and served as a Special Adviser in the Blair government. Consulting roles have seen Tom work for a wide range of clients, from pop groups to multinationals, trade bodies to charities. Whilst based in Hong Kong, he helped to grow and sell a private PR company.
CEO, EE and Consumer
Appointed September 2017. Marc is also Chairman and a BT appointed Director of the sports joint venture between BT Group and Warner Bros. Discovery. Marc was previously CEO of EE, and EE Chief Commercial Officer from 2011to 2015. He spent ten years at Three UK as Sales and Marketing Director and Chief Commercial Officer. Before that, Marc was General Manager of Sega UK and Europe. Marc is Chair of Jagex Limited.
CEO, Business
Appointed CEO, Business January 2023. Appointed CEO, Global June 2017. Bas was formerly President, BT in the Americas, Global Services. He joined BT Group in 2008 as CEO Benelux. Before that he was Executive President and a management committee member at Getronics NV, where he ran global sales, channels and partnerships, developing the company’s international business. He was also CEO and Managing Director of KPN Entercom Solutions.
General Counsel, Company Secretary & Director Regulatory Affairs
Appointed General Counsel April 2018. Appointed Director Regulatory Affairs and Company Secretary in May and September 2021 respectively. Before joining BT Group, Sabine was Chief Legal and Corporate Affairs Officer and Company Secretary of Anheuser-Busch InBev for 12 years. She also held various legal leadership roles at Diageo. Sabine is qualified to practise law in England and Wales and New York State. She is also a member of the Court of Directors of the Bank of England.
Chief Security and Networks Officer
Appointed Chief Technology and Information Officer February 2016 and became Chief Technology Officer March 2021. Appointed Chief Security and Networks Officer September 2022. Howard’s expanded role puts security at the core of our business. He was formerly Chief Architect and Managing Director, global IT systems and led the technical teams behind the 2013 BT Sport launch. Howard joined BT Group in 2011 and has 40 years of telecoms experience. This includes time at Telewest Communications (now Virgin Media) and Cartesian, a telecommunications consultancy and software company.
Chief Human Resources Officer
Appointed December 2022. Before joining BT Group, Athalie was Chief People Officer for BHP, the world’s largest mining and resources company. She led BHP’s organisation, people and culture transformation agenda and shaped their industry-leading inclusion and diversity agenda. Before that Athalie was General Manager, Cultural Transformation for National Australia Bank. She also spent 14 years leading complex business transformation and change programmes in Australia and Asia as a consultant with Accenture (formerly Andersen Consulting).
CEO, Openreach
Appointed February 2016. Clive was formerly CEO, Technology, Service & Operations, CEO Innovate & Design and before that President, Global Services Portfolio & Service Design. Under the provisions of the Commitments, Openreach’s CEO cannot be a member of the Executive Committee. Clive attends Executive Committee meetings as appropriate.
BT Group is the UK’s leading fixed and mobile communications provider. We build and run the biggest fixed and mobile networks in the country. We operate in both wholesale and retail markets. Our customers include consumers, small, medium and large businesses, public sector organisations and other communications providers. We create value by designing, building, marketing, selling and supporting network access, connectivity and related products to customers. We provide many of the fixed, mobile and converged connectivity solutions integral to modern life. They include broadband, mobile, TV, networking and IT services. We also sell other things – like handsets, gaming and insurance – to help our customers connect, communicate, share, be entertained and do business. A significant amount of what we earn goes back into maintaining and enhancing our fixed and mobile networks, improving customer service and developing new connectivity solutions – which bring value to customers and returns to shareholders. Through paying tax, interest, pension contributions and shareholder dividends, we contribute financially to a wide range of stakeholders.
We meet our customers’ needs by giving them outstanding connectivity and curated solutions – often with our partners. Our Consumer brands provide mobile, broadband, landline, and entertainment services to customers, at home and on the move. Individuals and households typically buy our services on monthly, recurring subscriptions on 12 to 36 month contracts, or as pay-as-you-go propositions. For our business and public sector customers in the UK and around the world, we provide connectivity, networking, cyber security, collaboration tools, cloud connectivity and cloud services. Small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) buy our solutions on 12 to 60 month contracts.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
Larger businesses and public sector customers usually buy managed solutions on multi-year contracts – helping them protect, run and grow their organisations and deliver their own digital transformations. Communications providers (CPs) buy wholesale mobile network capabilities, voice services, broadband, ethernet, and other connectivity solutions on one month to five or more year contracts through our Business unit. Through Openreach, we provide regulated wholesale access to our fixed access network infrastructure on multi-year contracts to over 700 CPs, including our own Consumer and Business units.
Our three customer-facing units (CFUs) focus on different segments. Each aims to provide outstanding customer experiences through tailored solutions which generate revenue and build long-term trusted relationships.
BT Group consists of customer-facing, technology, and corporate units. Our integrated model shares common platforms across our mobile network, technology, colleagues, and brands to help us to deliver the best results for our stakeholders. To comply with UK regulations and the Commitments, our Openreach customer-facing unit operates independently.
Our TUs build, maintain and run BT Group’s networks, platforms and digital assets – except fixed infrastructure assets which Openreach operates and commercialises. They’re also modernising our business through innovation, research and development (R&D), helping us be more agile, efficient and deliver better outcomes for customers. Our two TUs are:
Our CUs support our other units, driving efficiency across the group through centralised platforms, capabilities and shared services. They also facilitate group-level direction setting, governance and coordination – crucial for aligning business activities. Our four CUs are:
We’ve announced the creation of a new Strategy and Change unit to drive the development of BT Group’s corporate strategy and the next phase of our transformation.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 11
New EE is here. We are redefining the way our customers interact with us for all their connectivity needs, in and out of the home. A new brand that plays a bigger, more relevant and more personal role in our customers’ lives. We help people in over 13m homes to communicate, study, work, learn, play and be entertained through our EE brand.
13m
Our brands help us develop and sustain millions of relationships with a wide range of customers in a wide range of markets. BT is our flagship brand for business and public sector customers in the UK and globally. EE is our flagship consumer brand. It will be the go-to place for converged connectivity, including a broader range of products and services alongside connectivity.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 12
We have over 26m consumer and business connections across our different brands. That includes nearly 50% of UK households and more than 1m UK and global businesses and public sector organisations. Openreach connects around 22.9m physical lines for over 700 CPs – 43 of whom are signed to our Equinox 2 deal on our full fibre platform. The sheer size, scope and breadth of our customer base sets us apart for building excellent propositions and winning partnerships. Trusted relationships across our EE, BT and Plusnet brands help us understand customers’ current and future needs and create new products to meet them.
We build, own and run the UK’s largest fixed and mobile networks – covering both rural and urban areas. Our fixed network connects homes and businesses at speeds of up to 1800Mbps. And we’re also building the UK’s new digital infrastructure to provide even better connectivity for all. With the fastest build rate in Europe, more than 13.8m premises have now been passed with full fibre. We’re continuing to grow our mobile network too. Our strong position on spectrum holdings and access to base station infrastructure has helped our 4G network cover over 99% of the population and 5G reach more than 75%.
Our colleagues help us transform and achieve our ambitions. We employ over 94,000 people worldwide and almost 74,000 in the UK. We serve business customers globally. Our on-the-ground resources worldwide include 14 global security operations centres and four global strategic service hubs. Our expert Service teams hold more than 4,100 professional industry accreditations as well as over 4,800 technology accreditations. Our widespread local presence provides responsive support, underpinned by the expertise of our customer-facing and technical teams. More than 26,000 Openreach engineers build and run the fixed networks which power connectivity in UK homes and businesses. Their skills and commitment help us improve our networks for better connectivity and solutions that exceed customers’ expectations. Our leading retail presence – more than 430 stores – and over 15,000 support people help customers get the best from our solutions.
We can’t achieve our goals alone. Our partners and suppliers help us transform faster and create new solutions that benefit our customers. It’s because of strong partnerships that Openreach can efficiently grow its full fibre UK network. This collaboration lets us adjust our operations as we need, flexibly scaling them up or down. Partners like Microsoft, Amazon Web Services and Nokia complement our products and services. Tightly cooperating with them makes us more agile, and more focused on customers.
Innovation has always been the key to our success – keeping us out in front in a constantly changing world. This year we recognised £726m on R&D. We also filed 95 patent applications, bringing our portfolio to 5,385. Openreach continues to push innovation boundaries to help cut build and maintenance costs while improving network quality. Group-wide research at Adastral Park led the development of XGSPON-capable head-ends which will let Openreach deliver up to 8Gbs symmetric services to CPs.
We use our huge customer, product and network data sets for insights into what’s important and where to improve. To collect more insights we can act on, we’ve started to take more advantage of AI and machine learning. They’re helping us work smarter and faster to develop truly personalised solutions for customers and operate more efficiently across the group. And the better generative AI technologies get, the more valuable our vast data assets become.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 15
A record 200 million devices now connect to our network every day.
200m
Data, data, data
The data explosion is helping businesses like ours optimise their networks, develop personalised services, explore new revenue streams and improve customers’ experiences. But it also creates challenges around privacy, security, data governance and preventing breaches. That means we’re having to do a lot more to mitigate the associated risks.
Artificial intelligence
As AI and Generative AI get technically smarter, our industry is finding new uses for them. For example, AI can help improve customer experience to boost revenue or cut costs. But using AI more creates challenges on data privacy, algorithm bias and disruption to organisations and teams – which must be managed sensitively.
Cyber security
When more people and devices rely on being connected, coupled with businesses and governments keeping more sensitive data, there’s a bigger risk of cyber attacks, with potentially severe consequences when something goes wrong. Criminals and bad state actors are continually looking for ways to gather information for financial or geopolitical advantage. So cyber security is vitally important for us and our customers.
Technology modernisation
Full fibre broadband and 5G are spreading quickly across the world – providing reliable, high speed connectivity. The Centre for Economics and Business Research estimates that a full fibre UK will boost GDP by £72bn and cut our carbon footprint through reducing commuting. Our investment will give us a more reliable, cost-efficient network on which we can create better customer solutions.
Growing environmental, social and governance (ESG) focus
Consumers, businesses, colleagues and other stakeholders want companies to be responsible, inclusive and sustainable, and act in ways that benefit society and the planet. Concerns about matters like climate change and inequality shape stakeholders’ behaviour more than ever. Ethical companies with a clear purpose – who offer solutions that help customers address these issues – will benefit.
Why we exist
We connect for good
This drives everything we do. We help people, businesses and governments to harness technology to connect, improve lives and unlock potential without limits. We believe in the power of connections – in personal lives, at work and increasingly between machines and devices.
Who we want to become
The world’s most trusted connector of people, devices, and machines by 2030
We connect millions of customers across the globe to what they need – as a trusted partner helping them thrive in the digital world. Households rely on us to stay connected with loved ones. Businesses and governments partner with us to deliver for their stakeholders. As technology keeps evolving, we want to keep doing more to prove our dependability and build our customers’ trust.
Personal, simple, brilliant
Our values guide us to fulfil our purpose and achieve our ambition. They inform our culture – the collective spirit we all tune into. They’re more than just what we do. They reflect both who we are and who we aspire to be. They help us be a positive influence, win stakeholders’ trust and keep us accountable to society by setting high standards for our business. Our values guide all our decisions, at every level. They define how we work every day. They show us the right thing to do.
Our strategic framework explains our ambitions and how we aim to create value for our stakeholders. Our ambitions are bold and stretching. This year we made excellent progress against the three strategic pillars that support them.
We’re investing in the best converged network. For us that means making sure our full fibre and 5G networks aren’t just the broadest, but can also deliver converged capabilities. This combination of convergence, brilliant experience and faster, more reliable connectivity lets our customers do more. We’re becoming a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company – easier to work for and with, and more responsive to customers’ needs. We are simplifying our product portfolio, transforming customer journeys and modernising our digital and network technology with AI as a fundamental component. And we’re building a culture where people can be their best. That means creating a diverse, inclusive and forward-thinking workforce that has the skills we’ll need in the future.
We’re focused on delivering outstanding service and experience to our customers. That means creating market-leading service, brilliant digital touchpoints and trustworthy, secure and tailored experiences. Customers don’t buy products; they buy answers to problems. So, we’re creating smarter solutions based on the latest converged, intelligent connectivity services. We want our solutions to create value for our home and business customers and give them the outcomes they need. We’re building value through commercial excellence – with superior sales effectiveness and better marketing and pricing capabilities.
We’re setting up our corporate portfolio for growth. That means optimising our assets, investments and picking our partners carefully. The best new technologies will help us to grow sustainably. Our assets, capabilities and expertise should drive profitable growth and create brilliant outcomes for our customers and country. We’re creating a more responsible, inclusive and sustainable business. That means investing in digital skills, championing responsible technology and tackling climate challenges and inequality. We’re building trusted relationships with our stakeholders. Our diverse business can only succeed through our partnerships with customers, colleagues, governments, regulators, suppliers and communities. They are all critical to our success and we take them seriously.
Building the strongest foundations starts with the network. As the number of connected devices keeps growing, our customers expect the most reliable, secure and resilient connectivity. To meet their needs, we’re building the UK’s digital infrastructure at pace – through our new 5G network and c. £15bn full fibre investment.
Market leader in full fibre:
Market leader in mobile and 5G:
13.8m
Our full fibre network now passes a total of 13.8m homes and businesses including 3.9m rural premises. a
42,000
We’re also connecting around 42,000 customers every week.
75%
Our 5G network covered more than 75% of the UK population.
We continued to build the UK’s digital infrastructure at pace through our new 5G network and our c. £15bn investment in full fibre.
a Rural premises are defined according to Ofcom’s Area 3 classification.
Our 5G network now covers more major road and rail routes than ever before, including around the UK’s busiest and largest train stations. In London, upgrades throughout TfL’s underground network have helped enhance the rail experience as 33 London Underground stations have mobile connectivity. This year saw high-speed coverage go live at the first West End stations, recently followed by the first four Elizabeth line stations. We’re continuing to extend mobile coverage on platforms, escalators, in ticket halls and tunnels so you can continue to stream, call and text as you travel on the London Underground.
424tb of data on Central and Northern lines in the 12 months since the first stations went live.
424tb
This equates to spending over 72,000 hours streaming 4K video, 106m hours of music streaming, or 28m hours browsing the internet.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
We merged our old Enterprise and Global CFUs to create the new ‘Business’ CFU. This cut duplication and contributed to £142m of savings in FY24.
A simpler, more efficient and dynamic BT Group
We’re making great progress against our transformation ambitions – delivering £842m of cost savings in FY24. We’ve now realised our gross annualised cost savings commitment of £3bn against our May 2020 guidance. That puts us 12 months ahead of schedule. We’ve simplified our product portfolio and transformed customer journeys and processes:
– We merged our old Enterprise and Global CFUs to create the new Business CFU to better connect with customers and deliver brilliant, converged experiences. This has also cut duplication and supported £142m of savings we’ve realised in FY24.
– But we haven’t stopped there. We’re continuing to make BT Group simpler and more efficient:
– Our SAP system replaced 17 legacy finance systems, cutting licence and operating costs by £71m a year and improving group-wide access to financial data.
– We’re improving our ability to serve customers across different channels:
– By streamlining our customer ordering systems, we’ve given our teams the information they need to deliver excellent service.
– We’re moving to more modern, modular IT architecture and migrating our customers to strategic networks:
– We partnered with Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) to simplify our legacy estate by migrating over 500 legacy applications this year.
– We’ve closed our 3G network – the second old network we’ve switched off since the start of our transformation.
– 91% of our critical data is on the Google Cloud Platform, giving us a strong foundation to embrace the power of AI to create value from our data assets, delivering £125m of value to date and a further £76m confirmed into the future through efficiencies and new revenue against our £524m target.
– Our rollout of AI Ops, which enables ‘self-healing’ of technology when issues emerge, reached 23% across our estate, reducing human effort to fix outages and cutting downtime for customers.
– We’ve deployed ‘Service Now’ – a cloud-based workflow automation platform. It’s been adopted by more than 7,900 Business customers, improving their experience through automated processes.
£3bn
We’ve realised our gross annualised cost saving commitment of £3bn against our May 2020 guidance.
27%
We’ve simplified our Business product portfolio by 27%.
13%
In FY24, our decommissioning programme reduced our IT technology estate by approximately 13% versus last year.
Turned off, switched on
Retiring legacy networks and embracing modern infrastructure unlocks possibilities, enhances customer experiences, and fuels innovation. As we continue our work to upgrade the UK’s connectivity infrastructure, our efforts help drive economic competitiveness through seamless connectivity and emerging technologies. Additionally, it reduces our carbon footprint, contributing to a bright sustainable future.
Since announcing our transformation in FY20, we have reduced the number of legacy connections by nearly 60% (see page 49).
We closed our 3G network, resulting in estimated annualised cost saving in the region of £24m at the end state.
£24m
Estimated annualised cost saving from closing 3G network.
60%
Reduced the number of legacy connections by nearly 60% since FY20.
15,613
We switched off 15,613 fixed legacy network elements.
56,162tCO2e
Reducing emissions by 56,162 tonnes of CO2e at the end state.
27GWh
Saving roughly 27 GWh of power consumption.
140+ million
Enough to boil your 1.7 litre kettle more than 140m times.
We can’t deliver our ambitions without dedicated colleagues. So, our people strategy aims to make BT Group a brilliant place to work. We’ve made progress and achieved a lot, but there is more to do.
– Today’s work landscape is always changing. Giving colleagues new skills doesn’t only benefit them, it’s essential for our success:
– We’ve introduced My Campus – a new AI-driven learning platform for personalised learning experiences. This year, we achieved a very promising early adoption rate of 42% among colleagues that have participated in learning via the platform.
– We’re also empowering our software engineers through new technologies like Amazon Q Developer, a generative AI-powered coding assistant.
– A workforce as diverse as our customer base, and inclusion by design are critical to our strategy and will help us drive productivity, innovation and growth for the UK and beyond.
– We’ve made progress against our diversity goals but it’s not yet enough; we are committed to improvement because we know inclusion and diversity enable company performance (see page 31).
– Important foundations are in place; we have a strong community of People Networks and partners like 10,000 Black Interns and CyberFirst.
– And our hard work didn’t go unnoticed as the BT Group Ethnic Diversity Network was awarded “Best Network Group” at the Ethnicity Awards.
– Our data and surveys tell us that colleagues from under-represented groups are experiencing barriers and non-inclusive behaviours.
– Our Inclusion Plan aims to remove the barriers and improve the capability of our people managers to lead their teams inclusively (see page 31).
– Colleague engagement is still higher than external UK benchmarks. Following our March 2024 Your Say colleague engagement survey, it improved by 2 points to 75% compared to last year. This has been driven mainly by Openreach.
– All UK colleagues had a minimum of a 5.5% pay rise. Our junior frontline colleagues got bigger pay rises of up to 10%.
– Our Better Workplace programme is transforming BT Group workspaces. Since the programme started, we’ve closed 746 older buildings and moved over 22,000 colleagues to new facilities.
42%
This year, we achieved a very promising early adoption rate of 42% among colleagues that have participated in learning via the My Campus platform.
7,196
Engineers trained this year in new fibre skills.
We’re passionate about learning at BT Group, and we want to create a space where our colleagues can develop their tech skills and learn new ones too. That’s why we’ve launched My Campus, a new learning platform powered by AI, integrating content from Pluralsight, LinkedIn Learning, and BT resources. Tailored to each colleague’s role and interests, the platform provides easy access to videos, courses, articles, and podcasts for skill improvement. It also monitors mandatory training, development plans, and skills to enhance talent management.
37,335
different resources available to colleagues.
20,430
facilitated courses delivered to colleagues.
993
BT Group plans and pathways created to curate content for colleagues on relevant skills and topics.
Using this new knowledge helps prompt interesting discussions, the courses I’ve completed have encouraged open discussions with my team.
Simon Yu
Senior Digital Governance Manager for Digital at BT Group
To go beyond our customers’ expectations, we deliver outstanding service and experiences – while giving them smarter solutions and keeping them secure.
– By focusing on improving our customers’ experience, we’ve made good progress on all of our customer satisfaction metrics:
– BT Group NPS of 24.0, up one point year-on-year, further improving customer experience (see page 49).
– Openreach has a 4.6 ‘Excellent’ Trustpilot score, based on reviews from UK end customers.
– EE maintained the second lowest number of Ofcom complaints per 100,000 customers for mobile 2 and broadband 9.
– BT broadband had 11 Ofcom complaints per 100,000 customers – continuing to beat the industry average.
– We aim to keep our customers safe through strong security measures that instil trust in our services:
– Every month, we spot over 2bn malicious network events, which we use to protect our infrastructure and customers.
– BT Group was awarded the prestigious Prime Minister’s Award for Cyber – for helping customers avoid text message scams.
We keep on improving our portfolio to offer customers more flexibility. These evolutions also give them the latest converged, intelligent connectivity solutions to get more from their digital lives.
– Many customers are hanging onto their phones for longer. So we introduced ‘Flex plans’. The new service separates handsets and connection payments so customers can choose to pay off their phones over longer periods.
– We launched ‘New EE’ – a modern digital platform giving customers a broader range of products and more options on payments, technology and subscription management.
– ‘New EE’ is powered by an EE ID identity management system. Anyone in the UK can create an EE ID and buy products and services without having to be an EE customer. The EE ID user base exceeds 9.5m customers.
– We’ve introduced EE TV – a complete service of flexible premium content. This UK first features an Apple TV 4K app and a free multi-room option.
– Our new Smart Hub gives full fibre speed of 1.6Gbps and includes mobile back-up and next-generation wi-fi controls to make sure they’re always connected.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
– For business customers, we announced Global Fabric. This brand-new cloud-ready global network is flexible, scalable and offers pay-as-you-use connectivity – to help them get the best from a multi-cloud environment.
– With cyber security company Fortinet we’re providing a new networking and security service to help businesses manage multi-site connections. Fully managed by our experts, it minimises cyber risks and supports cloud migration.
– In collaboration with Johnson Controls, we’re providing smart building technology to optimise energy usage in workplaces, cut cost and accelerate the path to net zero emissions.
– Over EE’s network, we’re offering the UK’s first Drone SIM. It comes with unlimited data and connectivity in the sky – enabling safer drone flights, better control and live HD video streaming.
BT Group handles 999 calls in the UK, providing support to the emergency services round the clock, every day of the year. In June 2023, for only the second instance in history the teams handled over 1 million calls in a week. Read more at bt.com/annualreview. Our 999 call centres managed the highest annual call volumes ever recorded, totalling 41 million calls.
We’re dealing with more data, faster than ever before, as an increasing number of devices and machines are connected. Both individuals and businesses rely on this connectivity to be reliable, secure, and resilient and our fixed network enables this.
Online gaming is still having a big impact. For example, the release of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 in November 2023 saw an 89.9% surge in gaming traffic compared to Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2’s release.
Broadband traffic on Openreach’s network throughout the UK increased by around 9% in 2023.
The busiest day of 2023 for the BT/EE network was Tuesday 26 December (Boxing Day), when traffic peaked at ~25TBps and more than 147Pb of data was consumed.
More than 55,000 international roamers used more than 3Tb of data during Eurovision week, the equivalent of 750,000 hours of music streaming.
The release of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 in November 2023 saw an 89.9% surge in gaming traffic compared to Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2’s release.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 27
This year we continued simplifying our portfolio and removing non-core assets to streamline the group and position us for growth:
– For example, we divested Pelipod – a secure collection point service for UK field service engineers.
– Continuing our asset-light strategy outside of the UK, we sold BT Enia, a regional Italian telecommunications business.
We’re investing in the future by focusing innovation efforts on tech-driven growth areas that match our strengths. This will deliver better, smarter outcomes for customers.
– Our Adastral Park R&D centre continues innovating around network technology. Our experts are pioneering the next generation of communications capabilities to help transform how people live and work.
– The Adastral Park team also developed Multicast Assisted Unicast Delivery. It delivers more reliable, better-quality online video streaming – while cutting energy and bandwidth use during peak events by over 50%.
– In East Lothian we’re piloting the UK’s first Electric Vehicle (EV) chargers powered by our street cabinets. This could revolutionise EV charging across the country.
– Our remote healthcare solution uses a patient app to give them early access to health monitoring, resources to manage their conditions and instant remote access to clinicians. We’re currently piloting it in 26 GP practices.
Our Manifesto describes our long-term commitments to contributing positively to country and community.
– We’re creating a more inclusive society to help drive UK productivity, innovation and growth:
– This year we helped 3.7m people and more than 200,000 business owners and employees, improve their digital skills – a total of 23m people helped since FY15 (see page 35).
– We partnered with AbilityNet to help around 3,000 digitally excluded over-65s build confidence and skills through various campaigns – including a series of free ‘BTea Room’ digital workshops.
– To support small business customers we organised 120 Netwalks. This initiative provides self-care, mental health support, early intervention and networking opportunities to small businesses.
– Over 80% of UK children play games online at least a few times a week. So we launched an online resource called ‘GameSmart’ to give parents safety tips for managing children’s gaming - without being overly restrictive.
– We created EE Hope United to combat online hate. This year we lobbied the House of Lords to amend the Online Safety Bill to better protect women and girls.
– We’re pushing further to become a net zero carbon emissions business by March 2031:
– We’ve cut our carbon emissions intensity by 61% since FY17. And our transition from copper to full fibre networks will speed up our carbon emissions cuts – as fibre is 80% more energy efficient than copper.
– We’re also switching our commercial fleet to EVs. We added more than 1,700 EVs to the fleet this year, bringing the total to over 4,100.
– This year we cut our global energy consumption by 140GWh – a 4% drop.
– Our customers avoided more than 1.5m tonnes of carbon emissions this year through our products and services, including full fibre broadband.
– Openreach brought full fibre broadband to Fair Isle, one of the UK’s most geographically remote islands. To avoid protected landscapes and bird nesting season, they had to reroute the build by 100km. That’s the longest continuous fibre transmission distance ever deployed in the UK.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 28
This year we helped 3.7m people and over 200,000 small business owners and their employees improve their digital skills.
We worked with local science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enrichment experts Graphic Science for our National Careers Week 2024. We hosted a diverse group of secondary school students to help them think about what their future could look like in digital, data, innovation, and technology. Through interactive workplace activities and mentoring from colleagues, pupils gained hands-on experience with problem-solving challenges balancing people, planet and profit, developing inclusive technology solutions for mental wellbeing, interactive demos on fibre splicing, cyber security, data monitoring and VR simulations.
We hosted a diverse group of over 190 secondary school students at our National Careers Week 2024.
96% of pupils said that the day had helped them discover more about the tech industry and the role that they could play.
94% of pupils said that the day had helped them understand the links between their studies and the skills employers look for.
The day aimed to inspire students about future careers in digital, data, innovation, and technology fields while helping them identify transferable skills using our Get Work Ready toolkit.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 29
We’re creating a culture where everyone sees the value of curiosity and lifelong learning – and has the skills and capabilities they need to evolve with our business. This year we hired around 12,000 people. Roughly 8,000 were in the UK, including around 1,000 apprentices and 200 graduates. Roughly 17,000 colleagues left the business – around 14,000 through natural attrition and 2,000 through paid leaver programmes.
As our business evolves, so too will the skills and capabilities we need – resulting in a smaller, but more skilled, diverse and tech-savvy future team. We’re now clear on what’s needed to deliver on the workforce reduction targets we announced in May 2023, and to make the right changes to our mix of skills.
Building an inclusive environment starts with our leaders. This year we launched a 10-month learning programme for our senior leaders to build more inclusive leadership practices, with 87% enrolled so far. The programme focuses on creating an inclusive climate, building psychological safety, developing a sense of belonging and learning how to have conversations about inclusion. The training is also helping build the right habits and better accountability – with tools for leaders to apply what they’ve learned with their teams.
We created and ran a CEO-sponsored mini-MBA style programme for senior leaders in our Business unit. It helped our senior management team build a stronger community, fill in skills and knowledge gaps around effective commercial leadership and address cultural challenges.
We partnered with Women Returners on the ‘Restart’ project to attract and retain career returners. The widespread social media campaign generated significant interest and resulted in over 300 applications for 18 places.
Launched in September 2023, our ‘Business as Unusual’ campaign aimed to disrupt the market around hiring talent. It generated significant social media interest which helped us find 202 talented people, identify 24 exceptionally talented people for future hire, and hire eight. During the campaign we also got an overall increase in job applications. September 2023 saw the year’s highest number of applicants (a 26% uplift vs August). We had more external applications from women, and overall women external hires in the UK also rose to 45% in September and October last year.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
EE’s attraction programme kicked off in 2023. Aiming to reach a more diverse audience, it included a new EE brand campaign, industry partnerships and new candidate profiles. We’re already seeing a positive impact in terms of colleague retention. We also hired more apprentices than last year with recent cohorts 8% more likely to stay at least three months compared to our normal hiring process. My Campus – a personal learning platform Upskilling and reskilling colleagues across the group will boost our performance and help transformation happen. Making learning easier and more habitual gives us the best chance of giving our colleagues the right skills for the future.
We never stop investing in our people. Ethnic diversity is based on voluntary disclosure. In 2023, 77% of our UK colleagues disclosed their ethnicity.
We’re encouraging more inclusive thinking through understanding barriers to inclusion and taking action to make sure all our people can be their best at work. Our Manifesto has bold targets for diversity. While we’re making progress in ethnic minority representation, there’s much more to do in other areas. Our UK declaration rates are now 81%. More colleagues are feeling comfortable to declare their personal information, giving us better demographic data to help us focus on areas of concern. Our 2025 Manifesto targets for gender, ethnic minority and disability at various levels of the organisation are listed in the table opposite against the progress made in FY24. Whilst we have made progress towards some of our goals, we have work to do to make BT Group a more inclusive workplace for everyone as we strive to achieve our inclusion, equity and diversity ambitions. We are focused on improving inclusion in the way our jobs are designed and how our workplaces operate, underpinned by an unwavering focus on inclusive leadership capability – all of which are required for BT Group to have a workforce that reflects our customers and the communities we operate in. We collect diversity data for protected characteristics (as per UK employment law) and special category data (as per GDPR, or local laws in other geographies). This is done voluntarily, directly into our HR system (SAP SuccessFactors). We store, use and report on data in line with local laws and our advertised employee privacy notices. Due to local restrictions on capture and reporting of ethnicity and disability, the information opposite only relates to the UK.
More diversity in digital skills will drive productivity, innovation and growth in our business and for the whole of the UK (see our Manifesto on pages 34 to 39). Our focus on targeting under-represented ethnic minority communities in the UK meant that in FY24 29% of new UK-based roles in Digital were filled by people from ethnic minority backgrounds. We have a broad ecosystem of partners (including Career Returners, Code First Girls and 10,000 Black Interns) to help us reach into the community, create awareness, and invest in, develop and open up opportunities for future digital talent. We have engaged with colleagues through the Colleague Board (see the Corporate governance report on pages 90 to 91) and we have worked with our highly active and award- winning People Networks. These colleague- led groups raise awareness and advocate for change inside and outside BT Group.
| 31 March 2024 | 31 March 2023 | 2025 Targets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BT Group (excluding Openreach) | |||
| Men | 65% | 65% | |
| Women | 35% | 35% | 46% |
| Ethnic minority a | 16% | 13% | 16% |
| Disabled a | 9% | 8% | 14% |
| Openreach | |||
| Men | 90% | 90% | |
| Women | 10% | 10% | 12% |
| Ethnic minority a | 9% | 9% | 10% |
| Disabled a | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| BT Group | |||
| Men | 74% | 74% | |
| Women | 26% | 26% | 32% |
| Ethnic minority a | 13% | 12% | 13% |
| Disabled a | 8% | 7% | 10% |
| Board | |||
| Men | 50% | 67% | |
| Women | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| Ethnic minority a | 2 members | 2 members | 2 members |
| Disabled a | 1 member | 1 member | |
| Executive Committee b | |||
| Men | 60% | 70% | |
| Women | 40% | 30% | 33% |
| Ethnic minority a | 2 members | 2 members | 2 members |
| Disabled a | 1 member | 0 members | |
| Senior leadership team b & c | |||
| Men | 74% | 78% | |
| Women | 26% | 23% | 41% |
| Ethnic minority a | 11% | 14% | 15% |
| Black/black heritage a | —% | 1% | 5% |
| Disability a | 14% | 8% | 10% |
| Senior management team c | |||
| Men | 65% | 65% | |
| Women | 35% | 35% | 41% |
| Ethnic minority a | 9% | 9% | 15% |
| Black/black heritage a | 3% | 2% | 5% |
| Disability a | 14% | 9% | 10% |
a UK population only.
b For the purpose of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, our leadership comprises the Executive Committee (excluding Executive Directors on the Board but including the CEO, Openreach) and all Executive Committee direct reports (excluding admin roles). This totals 28 women (33%) and 56 men (67%).
c For the purposes of the Companies Act 2006, our senior management comprises those employees responsible for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the group, or a strategically important part of it (members of our senior leadership and senior management teams, and directors of the group’s subsidiaries but excluding directors on the Board). This totals 196 women (35%) and 355 men (65%). Numbers presented include 70 subsidiary directors (50 men and 20 women) who are not otherwise members of our leadership or senior management teams.
This is the seventh year we’ve reported our gender pay gap. Our UK gender pay gap is broadly the same as last year – we continue to track lower than the national average gender pay gaps:
– Our median gender pay gap narrowed slightly to 5.6% (-0.5%).
– Our mean gender pay gap widened slightly to 4.0% (+0.3%).
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median pay gap % | 17.8 | 17.4 | 14.9 | 15.1 | 14.9 | 14.3 |
| Office for National Statistics (ONS) median | ||||||
| BT Group median | 5.0 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 5.6 |
– Our gender gap is still lower than the UK average of 14.3% (median) and 13.2% (mean) and our female representation in the upper pay quarter has improved.
– Despite an increase in female hires between 2022 and 2023, female representation remains unbalanced at 23%, with a higher attrition rate among women. This is reflected in the pay quartile distribution, with a higher proportion of women in lower pay quartiles and little improvement in the upper pay quartiles.
You can read our full statement – including all the entities in scope at bt.com/genderpaygap
This is the fourth year we’ve voluntarily reported our ethnicity pay gap (which is not a legal requirement).
| Ethnicity pay gap % | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Median | Mean | Median | ||
| Ethnic minority | (0.8)% | (1.8)% | (0.3)% | (1.2)% | |
| Asian | (3.4)% | (2.9)% | (3.6)% | (2.4)% | |
| Black | 5.1% | (0.9)% | 6.6% | (0.3)% | |
| Multi- ethnic | 0.1% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 5.2% | |
| Other ethnic | (3.7)% | (8.7)% | (6.2)% | (9.3)% |
| Ethnicity bonus gap % | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Median | Mean | Median | ||
| Ethnic minority | 7.4% | 4.2% | 8.4% | 14.2% | |
| Asian | 4.2% | 2.5% | (2.1)% | 1.3% | |
| Black | 41.4% | 11.9% | 37.7% | 53.9% | |
| Multi- ethnic | (27.7)% | 2.3% | 0.7% | (14.9)% | |
| Other ethnic | (6.0)% | (3.5)% | (1.5)% | 40.1% |
Ethnic diversity is based on voluntary disclosure. In 2023, 77% of UK colleagues disclosed their ethnicity. Aggregated ethnicity pay gap analyses can often mask wider issues that people of different ethnicities face at work and in society. So each year we look at our data very carefully to get a more nuanced picture. In 2023 ethnicity pay gaps stayed low and favourable – with an overall median pay gap of -1.8% and a mean of -0.8%. But they do vary by different ethnic group. The figures above detail the movement in pay and bonus gaps to the majority by ethnic group from FY23 to FY24.
– The Black/African/Caribbean/Black British mean pay gap is still largest of all the ethnic groups – although it did narrow slightly this year and the Asian pay gap is the narrowest. This is reflected in the fact there are more Asian colleagues in higher-paid roles like management, and more Black colleagues in frontline roles like engineering.
This is the first year we’ve voluntarily reported our disability pay gap (which is not a legal requirement). It reflects our drive for equal opportunity across all characteristics. Disability is based on voluntary disclosure. At the time of the snapshot date in April 2023, 68% of UK colleagues disclosed their disability status. Improving this rate is the biggest lever to help us understand and improve our disability pay gap.
| 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mean | Median | |
| Pay | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Bonus | (6.5)% | (0.2)% |
– At group level, mean and median pay gaps are low – with a small mean gap of 0.7% and a zero median gap.
– The overall bonus gap is negative. This shows our disabled employees getting slightly higher bonuses – influenced by the higher declaration rate in our senior leader population.
You can find more examples of BT Group’s initiatives to improve representation (as well as pay quartile analysis, bonus information and entity breakdowns) in our ESG Addendum at bt.com/esgaddendum
We know how inclusive health affects our workforce and colleagues – so we listen to our People Networks closely. We partnered with our:
– Ethnic Diversity Network around mental health care disparities and to enhance our mental health services.
– Able2 Network on matters like occupational health, BT passports, living with disabilities and mental health.
– Jewish and Muslim Networks on coping with the impact of the situation in Israel and Gaza.
– Gender Equality, Carers, Pride, Peer to Peer Support and Armed Forces Networks on topics like cancer and suicide prevention.
– Carers Network to apply for Carer Confident Level 3 – Ambassador Status (The Employers for Carers Benchmarking Scheme).
We’re committed to making sure any colleague who needs a workplace adjustment gets one. These are positive adaptations which help colleagues with a disability, health condition or change in personal circumstances that might stop them working at their full potential. This year we initiated 1,146 referral cases, the most common being adjustments for back or neck issues (338 cases).# Strategic report
Where specialist advice is needed, a workplace adjustments referral service is provided by our third party team, Health Management Limited. Using empowER to raise cases for each referral provides Managers with a guided journey to follow and each case is supported by HR Services.
Absences across BT Group from sickness fell to an average of 3.67% calendar days lost per colleague (down from 3.87% last year). And when our colleagues need extra help getting back to work, our fully funded rehabilitation programme for musculoskeletal and mental health services returns 97% of them to full duties.
Today’s world is psychologically challenging. In a Volatile Uncertain Complex Ambiguous world we continue to be at the forefront of innovative approaches to improve the wellbeing of our colleagues and help them maintain optimum mental health. We continue to promote our Employee Assistance Programme and CBT Mental Health Service as well as online guided self help modules. In FY24 we started the process of getting BSI ISO 45003 certification for psychological health and safety in the workplace. We achieved the stage 1 audit objectives and the BSI auditor has recommended we now move to stage 2 audits. As well as strengthening our fitness for work medicals for our most critical roles, we continue to do statutory health surveillance for all our poling and civil engineers.
We’ve been getting more sophisticated insights from our health and safety data. We have moved from reactive use of data to earlier and more active intervention. The insights are helping us understand where to best focus our attention to make sure everyone at BT Group can work safely, and return home safe at the end of the day. Earlier intervention helps people stay in (or return to) work after injury or illness – helping work become more of a part of the rehabilitation process. In response to rising musculoskeletal related absences in our Openreach field engineering colleagues, using a data led, evidence-based approach we launched two new clinical intervention pilots this year to optimise colleagues’ health – the Musculoskeletal Specialist Assessment and Medical Assistance Programme. They include structured pathways to clinical support services, earlier categorisation based on the risk of long term sickness absence, and help for people to return to contractual work. In FY24 we reduced musculoskeletal- related absences by around 24,000 days equating to £500,000 in savings.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 33
Strategic report
£139,000 Introduction of My Discounts – new discount scheme for colleagues. Almost £139,000 worth of savings for colleagues in the first four months.
We are the first, calming voice heard every time someone in the UK calls the 999 emergency services. In FY24 we took 41 million calls – answering on average in less than a second. In 2023, we reviewed our attendance rules for the 999 service. Our aim was to make shift patterns fairer and more consistent. The changes we’re making include ‘bunched’ days off and a guaranteed weekend off every month. These will make our colleagues’ shift schedules more predictable and structured, while allowing more flexibility and making it easier for them to plan around their working weeks.
1,000+ To help out teams across the whole group, this year we launched My EV – our electric vehicle salary sacrifice scheme, which generated more than 1,000 applications in the first week.
Launched in 2021, BT Group’s Manifesto is our plan to accelerate growth through responsible, inclusive and sustainable technology. Our Manifesto is rooted in our purpose, to connect for good. And it will help us achieve our ambition – of becoming the world’s most trusted connector of people, devices and machines. It combines a clear commercial agenda with measurable promises to make a bigger positive impact on people and planet.
New tech must earn people’s trust and transform lives for the better. So we’ll:
– invest in new growth tech to help us live and work better
– apply responsible tech principles across our value chain
– partner to build a responsible tech ecosystem that builds trust and drives growth.
The future of tech must be diverse and inclusive for everyone to benefit. So we’ll:
– build a diverse workforce through our inclusion, equity and diversity targets
– pass 6.2m rural premises with full fibre by the end of 2026 (as part of our 25m build target)
– expand our 4G/5G mobile networks across the UK, including in rural locations
– help 25m people with digital skills by the end of March 2026.
Tech must accelerate our journey to net zero emissions and a circular economy. So we’ll:
– be a net zero business by the end of FY31, and net zero on all Scope 3 emissions by FY41
– help customers avoid 60m tonnes of CO 2 e by 2030
– build towards a circular BT Group by 2030, and a circular tech and telco ecosystem by 2040, while protecting nature and biodiversity.
We contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 34
Strategic report
New tech must earn people’s trust and transform lives for the better. We apply our responsible tech principles across our value chain. They help us consider how to minimise harm and benefit people every time we develop, buy, use or sell tech. They’re grounded in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and are part of our risk management framework.
Our responsible tech principles are:
Our Responsible Tech and Human Rights Sub-Committee oversees how we implement the principles. This year it continued looking at emerging risks and strategic growth areas. We used external experts to help define our approach on topics like high-risk markets, AI and new products and innovation.
We apply the principles right from the start when we design and develop new tech. This year we:
– completed a human rights impact assessment of wi-fi controls to help us identify, understand and assess the risks of the product
– conducted user research to understand how our responsible tech principles could build trust and differentiate us
– published our approach to children’s digital rights.
Our procurement company, BT Sourced, has responsibility and sustainability criteria set into its processes. They give our buyers clarity on supplier risks and opportunities. This year we:
– reviewed human rights risks in our supply chain, to better understand these risks and identify any gaps in our policies and processes
– launched a ‘worker’s voice’ pilot in five supplier factories, to understand the experience of people working in our supply chain
– carried on doing due diligence on our direct tier 1 manufacturing supply chain (visit bt.com/modernslavery for more).
We want to make sure our products and services are used for good. So we focus on protecting privacy and free expression and preventing online harms. This year we published an AI standard for colleagues, to ensure our use, development, purchase and sale of AI is consistent with the responsible tech principles, thereby helping to reduce risk at every stage of the AI life cycle.
We sell to customers around the world. This year we:
– enhanced sales due diligence in Business by adding checks for negative media coverage. This helps us assess any potential human rights risks through the life of a customer’s contract
– conducted a human rights impact assessment in a high-risk country, which we’ll use to steer future business strategy.
The 2023 Global Child Forum Benchmark Report looked at companies’ policies, approach and commitment to children’s rights. It rated BT Group as one of Europe’s top performing companies and as a global leader in the telecoms sector.
The future of tech must be diverse and inclusive for everyone to benefit. Embracing inclusion, equity and diversity is core to our people strategy and key to our growth. We want to be champions for digital inclusion too. Many families and vulnerable groups have been badly hit by the cost of living increases of recent years. We want to support them. We’re market leader in social tariffs, currently helping around 1m low-income and vulnerable customers through affordable fibre broadband and calls. And we’ve frozen these tariffs this year to protect them from inflationary price rises. Our Home Essentials social tariff gives discounted broadband to customers on Universal Credit. Our EE Basics tariff does similar for eligible mobile customers. And Openreach’s ‘Connect the Unconnected’ scheme waives connection fees for vulnerable customers, via their CP. Working with charity partner Home-Start UK, we’re also supporting the most socially excluded households through gift-in-kind contributions, fundraising and donations, which totalled more than £134,000 this year. And our digital skills help is giving more people the benefits of being online – particularly vulnerable groups in society, like children and over-65s. We’re developing the right digital infrastructure so no one gets left behind. Our full fibre broadband already passes 13.8m homes and businesses, including 3.9m in rural areas. Our 4G mobile network reaches 99% of the UK population, while our 5G network now reaches 75%, as we continue the rollout of 5G across the country. You can read more on page 20.
This year we helped 3.7m more UK people and businesses improve their digital skills.# Strategic report
Since FY15, the total is 23m people. And we’re on track to hit our target of 25m by the end of FY26. Tackling online hate Hope United is part of EE’s ongoing commitment to deliver positive societal change. It features a team of elite professional football players – representing all four home nations – coming together to tackle online hate. So far, it’s helped educate 10.9m people on being good digital citizens.
EE GameSmart helps demystify the world of gaming for parents, helping you to create positive shared experiences with your children. With game trailers, information and guides, parents feel ready to embrace the world of gaming. We’ve worked with Internet Matters creating content to help parents feel confident as their child enters the gaming world. Read more at eegamesmart.co.uk
During the 2023 Women’s Football World Cup, the ‘Play on’ campaign reached 3.5m people, encouraging young people not to drop out of sport due to hate. One of the EE Hope United squad also visited 10 Downing Street to support amendments to the Online Safety Bill, helping to protect women and girls.
Supporting small businesses
Our free digital skills programme helps businesses unlock their potential. This year we reached 200,000 more business owners and employees. We gave them:
– help on everything from digital marketing and social media to GenAI via our LinkedIn Live webinar series with partner Upskill
– practical tips and advice from successful entrepreneurs through our ‘Let’s Talk About’ video series
– access to live webinars, recordings and in-person mentoring through our partnership with the National Startup and Great British Entrepreneur Awards
– a UK-wide tour, webinars and mentoring sessions (working with Small Business Britain).
Employability and digital skills for young people
We’re bridging the gap between education and employment by making sure children and young people are part of the UK’s digital skills agenda. Over 1,000 secondary school children from disadvantaged backgrounds came to our ‘Get Work Ready’ days at our UK workplaces. The days gave a window into the types of STEM roles and skills needed in modern business – linking what they were learning at school to the skills employers look for.
With the national STEM Learning Centre and seven state schools in the Bristol Education Partnership, we helped launch the ENTHUSE programme. It supports teachers with essential continuous professional development and industry insights – and with workplace events to inspire students to consider roles in data, digital, engineering, innovation and technology.
We’re lead sponsor of the FastFutures programme to promote and grow digital talent in support of the Government’s skills agenda. Partnering with Avado and other businesses, we’re helping a diverse range of 18-24 year olds get into digital roles. So far, we’ve helped over 7,400 young people build their networks, get experience and accelerate their careers.
We’re currently funding two cohorts – a total of 500 learners – on a Digital Analyst Boot Camp. Eighty- seven BT Group colleagues were actively involved in mentoring 138 learners this year.
We also support the National Cyber Security Centre’s CyberFirst programme. Aiming to encourage school pupils into cyber and tech careers, the programme hosted events for more than 2,000 pupils last year. And it’s our 24th year organising and sponsoring the BT Young Scientist & Technology Exhibition, which is now one of Europe’s leading science and technology exhibitions, celebrating STEM research and innovation. This year’s event included 550 projects from more than 1,100 students from 219 schools across Ireland.
Child online safety
We’re helping to protect children online through a number of initiatives. This year we:
– relaunched PhoneSmart with better new functionality to help minimise online harm risks, as more and more youngsters own mobile phones
– launched GameSmart – featuring online safety information for parents on their child’s use of games and gaming devices
– ran a campaign with Internet Matters for parents of under-fives on healthy technology use
– launched an online safety hub on the Internet Matters website.
Senior skills
We have a long-standing history of helping UK citizens learn new digital skills. But today 7% of the population are still offline. Older people are one of the key groups in this population. They’re also more likely to suffer from social isolation, worries around living costs and losing their landline in the Digital Voice switchover. So far, in partnership with AbilityNet, we’ve helped around 3,000 digitally excluded over-65s build their confidence and develop digital skills. Together, we ran several ‘BTea Room’ sessions across the UK this year. Hosted in cafes, these free digital skills workshops covered a range of skills – from getting started with devices, to social media and staying safe online.
We teamed up with lexicographer Susie Dent to create a Digital Dictionary. It breaks down common digital terms that younger people take for granted but that are often confusing for older people. And we’ve also been targeting the networks of older and digitally excluded people to encourage them to help get their loved ones more online.
India skills partnership
Since 2019, BT India, with partner the British Asian Trust, has helped around 1.1m young people with digital skills, STEM career guidance and job opportunities. This year they launched an Outdoor School for Girls, which will provide digital, life, sustainability and entrepreneurial skills to 180,000 girls over the next three years. With our support, education company Katha is working with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to teach more than 4,000 girls, through setting up robotics labs, refurbishing IT labs and training teachers.
In today’s digital age, many essential tasks require internet access, yet 22% of seniors still do not use the internet. To bridge this gap, BT Group partnered with AbilityNet to offer tailored digital training for those aged 65 and above, boosting their skills and confidence online while promoting safety awareness. Read more at bt.com/seniorskills
We’ve helped 3,000 digitally excluded over-65s build their confidence and develop digital skills.
3,000
must accelerate our journey to net zero emissions and a circular economy. We’ve led on climate action for more than 30 years. We’ve been ‘A’ rated on climate by CDP for the past eight years running. But as the climate crisis worsens, we all need to speed up the transition to a low carbon economy.
This year we refreshed our Carbon Reduction Plan. It provides stakeholders with a clear view of the actions we’re taking to shift BT Group and our value chain to a net zero economy. We’ll be net zero for our operations by the end of March 2031 – and for our full value chain by the end of March 2041. We also aim to help customers avoid 60m tonnes of CO 2 e and build towards being a circular business by the end of March 2030.
Reducing carbon emissions in our operations
We’ve cut our carbon emissions intensity by 61%. This is against our science-based target of an 87% cut by the end of March 2031 (compared to FY17 levels). All of the electricity we purchase to power our buildings estate, shops and networks worldwide is certified as renewable a through our procurement of energy from sources that include power purchase agreements (PPAs) and green tariffs, supported by renewable energy certificates (RECs).
Long term renewable PPAs met 24% of our UK electricity demand this year, supporting additional renewable electricity infrastructure across the UK grid. Where we don’t control the supply of electricity or where we can’t guarantee the origin of the electricity, we purchase additional RECs to cover the proportion of our consumption (for example, at landlord controlled sites).
We have more to do to get to net zero. But we know how to get there – by electrifying our vehicle fleet, decarbonising our estate and building more energy-efficient networks.
Switching our vehicle fleet to electric
Nearly 80% of our operational emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) come from our commercial fleet of over 33,000 vehicles. We’re working hard and investing to convert the majority of this fleet to electric or zero emission vehicles by the end of FY31. In total we have over 4,100 electric vehicles (EVs) in our fleet, including more than 1,700 that we added this year.
As a founding member of the UK Electric Fleets Coalition, we’ll keep on pushing for policy measures to drive a UK EV switch. This year, the coalition published a new document to encourage more policy momentum on EVs.
Our start-up and digital incubation arm, Etc., has developed an EV charging unit built from a street cabinet (traditionally used to store broadband and phone cabling). We’re exploring the potential to turn up to 60,000 cabinets into EV charging points. This would increase the availability of charging infrastructure on the UK’s roads and support Government sustainability targets and plans to decarbonise the UK transport system.
This year, we introduced a salary-sacrifice scheme for UK colleagues to buy EVs through personal lease arrangements. And for colleagues in India, we’re introducing EVs as part of our transport and shuttle passenger services. Today there are 94 EVs in use and we’ll keep growing that number.
Decarbonising our buildings
We cut our global energy consumption by around 140GWh this year – a 4% drop on FY23. This was mainly achieved through rationalising and upgrading our buildings and networks, and reducing our fuel consumption as we continue to migrate our fleet to EVs. Our Better Workplace Programme is consolidating hundreds of BT Group buildings to around 30. The new or refurbished buildings have environmental impact firmly in mind. New builds meet the BREEAM b - Excellent standard.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 37
A rated A rated on climate by CDP. 4,100+ In total we have over 4,100 EVs in our fleet. 99.9% of the global electricity that BT Group purchases is certified as renewable. The remaining 0.1% is where renewable electricity is not available for purchase in the market. b Building Research Establishment’s Environmental Assessment Method, which is the world’s leading sustainability assessment for infrastructure.
We’re building more energy-efficient fixed and 4G/5G networks, while switching off our old legacy ones. As well as saving energy, full fibre networks are better at handling the effects of physical risks like flooding and higher temperatures. That means fewer faults or engineering visits.
Our Scope 3 carbon emissions account for 95% of our overall emissions. They come mainly from purchased goods in our supply chain and from customers using our products and services. Since FY17, we’ve cut our Scope 3 net emissions by 26%, to 3,000,873 tonnes of CO 2 e this year. This is a decrease of around 4% on FY23.
We’ll keep working with suppliers on cutting carbon. We’ve cut supply chain emissions by 25% since FY17. Our target is a 42% reduction by the end of March 2031. This year, we’ve refreshed our climate change policy, which forms part of our expectations and generic standards applicable to suppliers working with us. It requires them to conduct climate risk assessments, set 1.5ºC aligned science-based targets and to report on progress annually. And we continue to engage with key suppliers on carbon reduction through contract clauses, for example, we’ve seen savings from Circet that reduced over 100t CO 2 e in 2023 under its contract with BT Group and Openreach.
Also this year we:
– launched a campaign asking suppliers to set 1.5°C aligned science-based targets, make them public and report on progress annually
– encouraged more key suppliers to report to CDP to improve visibility and action on emissions. Today, over 300 of them are doing that
– continued working with the Exponential Roadmap Initiative and 1.5°C Supply Chain Leaders to drive climate action across global supply chains
– while supporting small and medium-sized enterprises through the SME Climate Hub and UK Business Climate Hub
– joined the JAC (Joint Alliance for CSR) Board of Directors. It’s an association of 27 communications providers working together to sustainably transform supply chains across the ICT sector.
There’s huge potential to use our networks, products and services to help customers cut their emissions – for example through decarbonising the grid and improving our products’ energy efficiency. We’ll help customers avoid 60m tonnes of carbon by the end of March 2030 – which they’ll do through technologies like full fibre broadband, mobile solutions and cloud computing.
This year we:
– helped customers avoid more than 1.5m tonnes of carbon (nearly 3.8m tonnes in total since 2021), mainly through our full fibre rollout that enables reductions in personal or work-related travel
– published a new carbon abatement methodology, to be transparent on how we calculate savings (bt.com/carbon- abatement)
– expanded our Digital Carbon Calculator to include compute and end point devices. The calculator helps our larger customers measure, track and cut carbon footprints across their networks. Today, it shows customers are cutting their CO 2 e by 15% on average when transforming their networks with us
– enhanced our Carbon Network Dashboard to include an energy optimisation recommendation feature, which helps our larger customers use their networks more efficiently. It enables them to measure, monitor and reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions
– hosted a Sustainability Festival at Adastral Park. More than 1,100 people came, including big customers, climate- leaders, start-ups and BT Group representatives. The event showcased cutting-edge technologies and how to drive sustainability and achieve net zero emissions in various industries.
Developing a circular economy is vital for achieving a net zero world. Around 70% of global greenhouse gas emissions come from material use and handling a . We want to build towards being a circular business by 2030, and a circular tech ecosystem by 2040.
This year, we collected nearly 2.6m devices from consumers and businesses through our returns and take back processes.
4% cut in our energy use this year.
1.5˚C Launched a new supplier engagement campaign asking our suppliers to set 1.5°C aligned science-based targets.
60m We’ve set a target to help customers avoid 60m tonnes of carbon by the end of March 2030.
This year, we converted over 94,000 surplus BT Smart Hub 2 into Plusnet Hub 2 routers, instead of making new routers, which usually creates a lot of carbon emissions. This effort saved around 3,900 tonnes of CO 2 e. By reusing all the electronics from the Smart Hub 2, we prevented over 80,000 kilograms of new electronics from being produced. Read more at bt.com/ annualreview
a Circle Economy – The Circularity Gap Report 2022 circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/en/knowledge/circularity-gap-report-2022-five-years-analysis-circle-economy
Through our EE Trade-In service we collected 166,000 mobile devices, pushing past the milestone of 1m devices traded in since its launch. For FY24, 96% of collected devices went for reuse and a second life. The rest we recycled responsibly. For distributed mobile devices our take back rate is 5%. We want to increase this to at least 20% by 2030.
For 2023, our return rate for customer premises equipment was 67%. Our target is a 75% return rate by FY26 a . Customers returned over 2.36m hubs and set-top boxes. Through our refurbishment process, we reused 71% and recycled the rest. We also began scaling up refurbishment of our business hubs.
To extend the lives of our customers’ devices, our EE repair service (approved by Apple, Samsung and Google) fixed 58,000 devices this year (up 94% on FY23).
To measure circularity in a more integrated way, we’ve started a pilot using the Circular Transition Indicator Tool on some of our own brand consumer devices. We’re now reviewing the inflows and outflows of those devices. We aim to expand the pilot to other business areas to implement a common measurement approach.
We want to put zero waste into landfill by 2030. That means increasing the number of things we reuse and recycle. Globally, we generated 69,000 tonnes of operational waste this year – 14% less than in FY23. Our UK recycling, reuse and recovery rate was 92.1% (90.4% globally).
As part of modernising our network, we continued recovering old or end-of-life network equipment to reuse or recycle, much of which was through our Exchange Clearance Operations programme. This year, we recovered 3,300 tonnes. We also agreed a deal with a leading bank and global recycler EMR to support the extraction and recycling of copper cable from our network until 2028. Within our business, we reused 10,000 pieces of network equipment. And our catering partner Lexington, working with CauliBox, has been trialling new reusable cups and containers to reduce the number of disposables we use.
We continued working to understand our impacts on nature and biodiversity, in line with the draft Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) framework. This year, we ran an impact assessment of our operations and procurement. As part of our focus on conservation, BT Group has partnered with The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts. We provide financial contributions to the charity and volunteering opportunities for colleagues.
Openreach created a Business Conservation Partnership with the RSPB, to make sure that, moving forward, they are better placed to implement nature- positive actions as part of the overall fibre build programme. Openreach has also worked closely with NatureScot and National Trust for Scotland in providing fibre to Fair Isle (between Orkney and Shetland). They scheduled their build to make sure that nesting birds were undisturbed during the breeding season, and worked together to protect native plant species.
Our UK water use fell by 12% this year to 1,349,324m 3 , mainly from operating adiabatic cooling units more efficiently within network equipment operating limits, and the pinpointing and fixing of leaks in our water supply.
Corporations must advocate on climate action. But limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees – in line with the Paris Agreement – will need supportive policies too. During the year we continued participating in initiatives like RE100, the UK Electric Fleets Coalition and EV100, Race to Zero and the We Mean Business Coalition. We also supported the Fossil to Clean campaign to advocate for speeding up the shift from fossil fuels to clean energy.
2030 We want to become a circular business by 2030 – and build towards a circular tech ecosystem by 2040.
20% We have a 5% take back rate for distributed mobile devices – we’ve set a target to increase this to 20% by 2030.
a This target only relates to equipment which is leased to our consumers under their contract terms.
Colleagues, customers, shareholders, the communities we do business in, suppliers, UK Government and regulatory bodies are all key stakeholders. We connect with them at all levels of our business. That includes frontline operations, CFUs, CUs and TUs, senior leadership, the Executive Committee and the Board and its Committees. We engage with them in lots of different ways – from meetings and conferences to reviews, forums and webcasts.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 40 Strategic report
Our stakeholders play a crucial part in our strategy of building the strongest foundations, creating standout customer experiences and leading the way to a bright, sustainable future. Our stakeholder management group risk category recognises just how important they are to our business. You can read more on page 63. Our Section 172 statement on pages 92 to 93 gives examples of how the Board and its Committees took our stakeholders’ interests into account in decision making during the year.
To create a culture where colleagues can be their best and contribute to our purpose, ambition, strategy and success, they need to be engaged. So we must provide work environments that help them flourish, give them flexible and agile ways of working, deliver brilliant training, development and career opportunities, and reward performance with fair and competitive pay and benefits.
Our Board gets regular updates from the Chief Executive and Chief Human Resources Officer. Topics range from people strategy initiatives to culture and overall sentiment in the organisation. This year the Board used both our Colleague Board and our Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement to engage with our workforce (under the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018). You can read more on pages 90 to 91 of the Corporate governance report.
In September 2023, we changed the way we measure engagement. We did this to bring it up to date with best practice and give us better external benchmarks for BT Group and our units. We introduced quarterly colleague engagement surveys. And to compare old and new surveys we asked both old and new engagement index questions in the first September survey. Engagement scored pretty consistently between old and new measures – at 72% and 71% respectively. Across the year engagement improved by two points. We closed the year on 75% in line with our target. The measure ‘Getting things done here is straightforward’ is not making enough progress. We’re investigating why. Initiatives to improve our colleagues’ experience seem to be making a difference. We’ve focused on leadership, making things simpler for colleagues and inclusion and diversity. We’ll continue with this in the coming months.
We want our customers to have standout experiences. For that, we must deliver outstanding service and differentiated solutions and outcomes. We have a large and diverse customer base, from individuals to multinational businesses and governments. And they all need different things. So engaging with our customers is critical to properly understand those varied current and future needs.
Our customers want us to:
– give them an outstanding experience and deliver outcomes that match their needs
– deliver consistent, high-quality solutions to keep them connected
– protect their security and data
– offer all the above at a price that’s great value for money.
– Our service, sales, and contact centre colleagues regularly talk to customers to understand what they need and help them stay connected.
– Our insight centre of excellence gives us a deeper understanding of our customers’ needs through research techniques and extensive internal and external data sources.
– Our CFUs, Executive Committee and the Board monitor how well we’re providing standout customer experiences by regularly reviewing metrics like NPS.
– Our Chief Executive, Executive Committee and senior leaders regularly review and discuss customer complaints.
– Our Customer Fairness Panel, Customer Inclusion Panel, Security Advisory Board and Global Advisory Board help us better understand customers’ needs and experiences through direct conversations with them.
– Openreach makes sure every CP gets equal access to our fixed network by engaging them through a transparent and compliant consultation process.
– We’re simplifying our contract communication and charges by expressing changes in pounds and pence instead of percentages, making it clearer for customers.
– We’re visiting every UK region to raise awareness and to make sure all customers understand the simple steps needed to make the move to Digital Voice.
| Engagement Score | Details |
|---|---|
| 72%/71% | Engagement scored consistently between old and new measures – at 72% and 71% respectively. |
| 75% | We closed the year with an engagement score of 75%, in line with our target. |
| 5,700 | Interacting with over 5,700 customers every year to better understand how to meet their needs. |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 41 Strategic report
BT Group saw a surge in SMS Smishing scams. In response, we formed the BT SMS Scam Squad in 2022 to ensure #TrustinSMS. Read more at bt.com/ annualreview
Prevented more than 76 million SMS scams over the last year from reaching victims. 76.1m
We make a significant economic contribution to the UK communities we serve. But we’re also at the heart of those communities, helping to bring them together. We need communities to trust us. Without that we couldn’t deliver our growth plans or our purpose – to connect for good.
The communities we serve want us to:
– give them reliable and secure connections
– help local people and businesses get more from the digital world
– provide direct and indirect employment
– do business ethically and responsibly and protect the environment.
– Community members use our products and services as part of their daily life and work.
– We provide support through retail stores and contact centres – and through home visits to set up, install and maintain our services.
– Our digital inclusion and wider societal programmes bring digital skills training to millions of UK people (including children, older and more vulnerable groups, and small businesses).
– We use customer surveys and reputation tracking to understand community perceptions of us and inform our focus areas and targets. Our Executive Committee reviews this feedback monthly and it’s shared with the Board quarterly.
– The Responsible Business Committee oversees our societal programmes – tracking feedback and performance through a dashboard discussed at each meeting.
– Based on a report commissioned in 2023, in one year we spent more than £9.3bn with UK-based suppliers, we supported £1 in every £80 of UK Gross Value-Added a and supported a total of 284,000 UK full-time jobs indirectly a .
– We’re one of the UK’s biggest private sector apprenticeship employers. We’ve hired over 3,000 apprentices and graduates over the past five years and we’re planning to hire over 500 more in 2024. In 2023, we were ranked second in the UK’s Top 100 Apprenticeship Employers.
– We’ve expanded our full fibre network to 3.9m rural homes and businesses as part of our 6.2m aim by December 2026 (see page 20).
– We’re extending 4G coverage to rural areas through the shared rural network initiative. And we aim to reach 90% of the UK’s geography with our 5G network by 2027 (see page 20).
– We give extra support to around 1m low-income and vulnerable customers through our social tariffs and subsidised products (see page 35).
– Our gift-in-kind contributions, colleague fundraising and donations provided over £134,000 to our charity partners Home- Start UK, to support the most socially excluded UK households.
– We helped fund UNICEF’s ‘digital learning passport’ tech platform, while colleagues raised over £35,000 to support their Children’s Emergency Fund and other humanitarian relief programmes.
– Colleagues donated over £1.3m to more than 1,100 charities through payroll giving.
– Colleagues volunteered more than 53,000 hours of their time to our charity partners and communities – including sharing skills and expertise through mentoring and digital skills training programmes.
– We also support communities through our Manifesto commitments. They include our digital skills goal, which this year reached a further 3.7m people and has helped a total of 23m people since FY15 (see pages 34 to 39).
| Economic Impact | Details |
|---|---|
| £9.3bn | We’ve spent more than £9.3bn in one year with UK-based suppliers and supported £1 in every £80 of UK Gross Value-Added a . |
| 284,000 | We supported a total of 284,000 UK full-time jobs indirectly a . |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 42 Strategic report
Our stakeholders continued
Openreach brought ultrafast full fibre broadband to the remote Scottish island of Fair Isle which required an innovative engineering solution. Our engineers built the UK’s first fibre repeater terminal to boost the signal enabling life-changing connectivity as part of the Scottish Government’s R100 programme. Read more at bt.com/ annualreview
a Taken from ‘The Economic Impact of BT Group plc in the UK’ report 2023 at bt.com/economic-impact, commissioned every two years.
We have both equity and debt investors. Our equity investors are corporates and institutions – who hold the biggest volume of shares – plus around 614,000 individuals. Our debt investors are mainly financial institutions who buy our publicly traded bonds. They’re crucial to making sure we have access to debt capital to finance our business. We have an investment-grade credit rating based on the strength of our balance sheet, our scale and competitive market position.
Our shareholders want us to:
– deliver a return on their investment through dividends and capital growth
– perform well against our long-term strategy and outlook.
– We engage with shareholders through our investor relations activities, Annual Report, financial results, AGM and other documents and briefings.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 43
– Our AGM is a chance for Board directors to meet shareholders. In 2023 it was held in Birmingham with all resolutions passed and published on bt.com/agm. We’ll publish arrangements for the 2024 AGM in the Notice of meeting (see page 130).
– Individual shareholders interact with the Company Secretary (or their delegate) and also our share registrar Equiniti.
– Institutional and debt investors engage via our investor relations team – through one-to-one conversations, roadshows, group meetings, conferences and industry events.
– Through this engagement, the Chairman, Directors, Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer, other executives and our investor relations team had 222 investor meetings this year. Topics included:
– our strategy and competitive position in key markets
– our financial and operational performance (particularly in the context of inflation, energy and pay costs and CPI-linked pricing)
– capital investment (including FTTP and 5G)
– our capital allocation policy
– prospective governmental and regulatory policy decisions
– our pension fund valuation.
– The Board gets regular reports on top shareholders, movements in the share register, share price performance and engagement with investors and analysts. It discusses and considers issues with management as part of its decision making. The Chairman, directors, Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer, other executives and our investor relations team had 222 investor meetings this year.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 43
Strategic report
Our equity investors are corporates and institutions – who hold the biggest volume of shares - plus around 614,000 individuals.
614,000
Good supplier relationships are essential for our success. They help us deliver the solutions and propositions that create standout customer experiences. Our suppliers want us to:
– pay them in line with our agreed terms
– help them optimise their own supply chains and cash flow management
– act ethically and transparently.
We need to know who we’re doing business with and who’s acting on our behalf. So we:
– select suppliers based on principles around acting ethically and responsibly
– do due diligence on suppliers before and after we sign a contract – covering financial health, anti-bribery and corruption and whether they meet our standards on areas like quality management, security and data privacy
– check the things we buy are made, delivered and disposed of in a socially and environmentally responsible way
– measure suppliers’ energy use, environmental impact and labour standards
– and work with them to improve these.
Operating from its Dublin base since April 2021, BT Sourced is our standalone procurement company. It’s focused on challenging the traditional ways of buying goods and services by simplifying processes, introducing new technology and working more in partnership with suppliers and start-ups. BT Sourced delivered some key initiatives this year:
– With start-up Nnamu we developed and piloted a ‘negotiation bot’ based on game theory. It recommends optimum negotiation strategies and tactics, and negotiates autonomously.
– Autonomous AI-powered platform Globality is being widely adopted. Its generative AI features are speeding up our scoping processes and streamlining how we define what we need. Plus its new E-Negotiation and online NDA features are simplifying the whole sourcing process.
– Specialist macro risk partner PRISM has developed a digitised platform. It shares risk reports, giving us instant access to strategic risk information and a useful archive. It’s a valuable resource which is helping us make better, faster procurement decisions.
– Our in-house negotiation analytics team continued expanding their AI and machine learning capabilities. To give us a 360-degree view of our suppliers, they combined existing internally developed solutions with summaries of earnings reports, news feeds, projected spend and ESG position.
– Responding to inflationary challenges, we strengthened our partnership with C2FO to give suppliers better access to competitive working capital. We also made C2FO’s early payment solution more widely available to thousands of our suppliers.
– As part of BT Group’s ESG supply chain assurance, we worked with Labor Solutions to run a ‘worker’s voice’ survey with five key Asia-based suppliers. Supported by strong identity safeguards, the survey got around 1,500 responses. For more on ESG, see the ESG Addendum (bt.com/esgaddendum).
The results:
– Partnering with start-ups like Nnamu will help us scale our digital procurement innovations and benefit stakeholders, buyers and suppliers.
– Buyers have so far launched more than 1,000 projects on the Globality platform, with a total spend of roughly £7.9bn. In December 2023, the platform hit a 1.1 working day time-to-market, a big improvement on the typical seven to ten working days with traditional sourcing processes.
– Findings from our ‘worker’s voice’ survey gave no major concerns. But they did give us the chance to strengthen relationships with the suppliers we surveyed. We will continue and expand the programme into FY25.
– More than 1,000 of our suppliers have signed up to C2FO, including many small and medium-sized businesses. In 2023 we facilitated £1.25bn in early payments.
– We’re building a more resilient supply chain by adding our new supplier management risk framework (including internal controls) into our wider group key controls framework.
– Responding to changing geopolitics, we’re improving our crisis management capabilities. We’re also investing in risk intelligence to help us get a clearer view of the macroeconomic landscape to inform our decisions. You can read more on our risk focus on page 61.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 44
Strategic report
More than 1,000 of our suppliers have signed up to C2FO and in 2023 we facilitated £1.25bn in early payments.
We added more than £24bn to the UK economy based on a report commissioned last year a , supporting critical services and working with more than 1,100 public sector customers.
Our networks support vital public services like welfare, tax, health, social care, police and defence – while protecting citizens’ personal data. Our relationship with Government bodies underpins our three strategic pillars and lets us contribute to policies and initiatives that promote the best results for stakeholders.
Government stakeholders want us to:
– keep investing in our network infrastructure
– provide the fastest, most reliable and secure connection possible, to the widest possible range of communities
– invest in the best products and services, at fair prices, with high levels of customer service
– support vulnerable customers through tough economic times.
Our public policy work with Government covers a wide territory, from infrastructure investment to national security, from regulating online harms to trade and economic policy.
– Our policy and public affairs team manages our relationships with Government and other politicians.
– We operate part of the UK’s Critical National Infrastructure and support national security.
– Our Business unit delivers and looks after public sector contracts like the Emergency Services Network.
– Under the Communications Act 2003, the government can ask us (and others) to run or restore services during disasters. The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 also says that they can impose obligations on us (and others) in emergencies, or in connection with civil contingency planning.
– We keep an open dialogue with Government through our Chairman, Chief Executive and senior leaders – as well as through consultation responses and cross-industry initiatives. Through those conversations we build support for policies that will deliver good results for the UK and our shareholders.
– The Board comments on discussions with Government through updates from the Chairman, Chief Executive and Executive Committee members.
– Our public policy work with Government covers everything from infrastructure investment to national security, from regulating online harms to trade and economic policy.
– This year, we contributed to government initiatives including its wireless infrastructure strategy, supply chain resilience, data policy, drones, quantum technologies and AI.
– We’ve given input and evidence into legislation including the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Bill, Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, and Online Safety Bill.
Regulation helps protect consumers and promote healthy competition. Our main regulatory relationship is with Ofcom who regulate UK communications and TV services. We also work with other regulatory bodies like the Financial Conduct Authority, Competition and Markets Authority and the Information Commissioner’s Office.
Our regulators want us to:
– act fairly and transparently with customers
– compete fairly in the markets we operate in
– invest in the UK’s critical digital infrastructure
– promote investment and innovation.
– We have a constructive, open dialogue with Ofcom through our Chairman, Chief Executive and senior leaders. Conversations focus on how regulation can support investment in world class digital infrastructure, while keeping the market competitive and fair.
– At a working level we regularly engage with Ofcom and other regulators through industry consultations and information requests – helping them analyse and understand the impact of proposed regulatory changes.
The results:
– In 2017, we put the Commitments in place. They give Openreach a degree of strategic and operational independence. We regularly engage with Ofcom and other CPs to reassure them that we’re following the letter and spirit of the Commitments.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 45 Strategic report
– During the year, and on the Board’s behalf, the BT Compliance Committee monitored compliance with the Commitments through both our culture and colleagues’ behaviour. Ofcom and other stakeholders attended BT Compliance Committee meetings by invitation. The responsibilities previously held by this Committee have transitioned to both the Audit & Risk and Responsible Business Committees for FY25 onwards. See pages 99 and 105 for more details.
a ‘The Economic Impact of BT Group plc in the UK’, Hatch – 2023 Edition, based on FY22 data.
See pages 28 to 29, 37 to 39, 49, 71 to 80, 92 and 105.
Our Health, Safety and Environment Group Policy explains how we’re protecting the environment and building a more sustainable future. Our main priorities are cutting carbon emissions (our biggest environmental impact) and being more energy efficient. It also sets out our commitment to partnering with stakeholders. And it’s supported by our environmental strategy and goals of becoming a net zero and circular business. Every year we report on how we’re doing in our operations and wider value chain (see pages 37 to 39).
The Group Health, Safety & Environment Sub-Committee monitors and manages our environment strategy and risks, acting on the Executive Committee’s behalf. The Responsible Business Committee oversees progress against our environmental goals. We review and update our policies every year.
You can read more on our plans and performance – including progress on net zero – on pages 37 to 39 and in our ESG Addendum at bt.com/esgaddendum.
We consider environmental and climate-related risks across our whole business – including stakeholder and supplier management, health, safety and environment, and operational resilience. There’s more on our group risk categories on pages 63 to 70. We’re mitigating our environmental impact and key physical climate risks in lots of ways. You can read more on pages 37 to 39 and in our Task Force on Climate- related Financial Disclosures statement on pages 71 to 80.
See pages 24, 30 to 33, 41, 90 to 91 and 92.
Our people’s wellbeing will always be at the heart of our business. It’s in our code: We always put wellbeing and safety first. It’s also written into our Health, Safety and Environment Group Policy. Our strategy is to build a fulfilled, safe, happy and healthy team in a culture where everyone can thrive. We do this through wellbeing programmes to boost colleagues’ performance, resilience, happiness and engagement.
International standard ISO 45003 ‘Psychological health and safety at work’ says that psychosocial risk management must have needs from all levels and functions – especially top management. We agree with the concepts raised in the standard. We apply them to help prevent work-related injuries or ill-health in colleagues and to promote positive wellbeing at work.
Our Inclusion, Equity and Diversity (IED) strategy takes a programmatic, evidence- based approach. It helps us understand and remove bias and other cognitive barriers from policies, processes, systems and decision making. It supports our aim to build the strongest foundations by making sure we apply an inclusion lens to everything we do and by promoting a healthy culture.
We plan against three goals – Promote, Support and Restore. From these we create focused, evidence- based interventions and campaigns. They promote the importance of wellbeing and ensure all our people can access wellbeing support and services. We also work with stakeholders across the business to make sure our wellbeing approach is consistent, integrated and part of our culture. We review policies every year, updating them when needed. We update the Board and Executive Committee regularly. We coordinate health and safety through our Group Health, Safety & Environment Sub-Committee and with our unions through the Good Work Forum.
Well-established governance processes make sure we integrate IED into decisions and policy development. We report to the Executive Committee on our strategy’s relevance and effectiveness and on progress against our diversity targets. We also update the Board. Our People Networks champion members’ concerns and are sponsored by Executive Committee members or by the CEO, Openreach. Our Colleague Board also helped shape and influence IED plans. We review policies every year, updating them when needed. You can read more about the Colleague Board on pages 90 to 91 – and about other ways we engage with colleagues on page 41.
There are details of what we’ve done to apply our policy on page 33. You’ll find information on absence rates and other wellbeing metrics in our ESG Addendum at bt.com/esgaddendum. Our strategy creates a culture that embraces IED and embeds it into our decisions. There are details of what we’ve done this year to support our strategy – together with the latest IED statistics – on page 24.
We reflect wellbeing as part of the people and health, safety and environment group risk categories on page 68. We reflect IED risks in our people group risk category on page 68.
See pages 26 to 27, 34 to 39, 42, 49 and 92.
Our Manifesto is rooted in our purpose. It’s supported by commitments on three themes – responsible, inclusive and sustainable. It recognises we’ll only succeed if we help solve some of the problems faced by the societies and customers we serve. In particular, our commitment to help give people digital skills will benefit wider society. Our ‘BT Group charity approach’ explains how we partner with charities and support our people’s volunteering work.
The Responsible Business Committee:
– oversees our Manifesto commitments and progress
– reviews our strategy and progress on societal programmes and targets
– monitors progress against the goal of reaching 25m UK people with help to improve their digital skills by FY26.
We report on how we invest in communities on page 42. You can read more on our Manifesto and what we’ve achieved this year on pages 34 to 39. That includes progress on helping people improve their digital skills.
We consider digital inclusion risks as part of our stakeholder management group risk category on page 63.
See page 35
Our Human Rights Policy explains how we respect and champion human rights in our business – and through our relationships with others. It’s supported by our responsible tech principles. Our Manifesto reinforces these principles and our respect for human rights.
We have processes to identify and tackle potential and actual human rights impacts across our business. That includes checking we’re applying responsible tech principles when we develop, buy, sell and use tech. Our Responsible Tech and Human Rights Sub-Committee oversees how we implement the principles, giving updates to the Responsible Business Committee. Respecting human rights is part of mandatory annual training for all colleagues. We identify, measure and tackle human rights impacts through our Speak Up whistleblowing service, and through risk assessments and on-site audits.
We’ve improved our Business sales due diligence to help us better identify and tackle potential human rights impacts from our products and services. We report on our responsible tech principles on page 35.
We consider human rights risks as part of our stakeholder management and supply management Group risk categories on pages 63 and 70.
Being trusted: our code sets out promises including zero-tolerance of bribery and corruption. It’s supported by specific standards on Anti-Bribery and Corruption (ABC), gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest and high risk third parties. The code describes how we expect everyone who works here – or on our behalf – to do business. It also covers extra policy areas like human rights, and equality and diversity. And it provides an ethical framework for our ambition to become the world’s most trusted connector of people, devices and machines. Through our commitment to doing the right thing, it shows how stakeholders can depend on us.
We do due diligence on third parties, engage external providers to assess higher risk areas, and use an integrity risk dashboard to identify potential focus areas. We take a risk-based approach to third- party due diligence. We also have enhanced approval, due diligence and monitoring processes in place for higher risk third parties. In 2024, we’re launching a new system to better manage gifts and hospitality and conflicts of interest disclosures.
All colleagues get mandatory training on our code. We also publish communications that reinforce policies. Two of our quarterly colleague engagement surveys include questions on ethical perception, with results shared with senior management. Speak Up, our whistleblowing service, lets anyone who works for (or with) us to confidentially report anything that goes against our code. This includes bribery, corruption, human rights violations, bullying or harassment. It had 744 reports this year.
We consider ABC and ethical conduct risks within the legal compliance group risk category – where risks apply across our operations generally. See page 66 for more.
We continue to monitor and evolve our KPIs to ensure those reported are the best measures against our strategy. During FY24 we have updated our KPIs to more accurately reflect our strategic priorities. We now recognise ‘units on legacy’ as a KPI, which monitors customer migration from legacy to our strategic network platforms.# Strategic report
We use ten KPIs - five operational and five financial. We reconcile the financial measures to the closest IFRS measure on pages 230 to 233.
| FY24 | FY23 | FY22 | FY21 | FY20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported revenue (£m) | 20,797 | 20,681 | 20,850 | 21,331 | 22,905 |
| Adjusted EBITDA (£m) | 8,100 | 7,928 | 7,577 | 7,415 | 7,907 |
| Normalised free cash flow b (£m) | 1,280 | 1,328 | 1,392 | 1,459 | 2,011 |
| Reported capital expenditure (£m) | 4,880 | 5,056 | 5,286 | 4,216 | 3,960 |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) (%) | 8.5 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 8.6 | 10.2 |
| FY24 | FY23 | FY22 | FY21 | FY20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT Group Net Promoter Score (NPS) point increase/(decrease) | 1.0 | (1.0) | 2.3 | 7.8 | 5.5 |
| Total Openreach FTTP connections (m) | 4.7 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| Total 5G subscriptions (m) | 11.1 | 8.6 | 5.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| Percentage reduction in carbon emissions intensity (% reduction) | 61 % | 55 % | 55 % | 57 % | 43 % |
| Units on legacy (m) | 6.5 | 10.6 | 11.6 | 14.2 | 16.2 |
We no longer recognise the cumulative number of people trained on digital skills as a KPI, but we still recognise it as an important metric and track progress – see page 35 for more details. Adjusted EBITDA margin has been discontinued as a KPI, although revenue and adjusted EBITDA remain KPIs.
Reported revenue (£m)
Definition
This is our revenue as reported in our income statement.
Performance
Reported revenue was £20,797m (FY23: £20,681m). The increase was driven by price increases and fibre-enabled product sales in Openreach, increased service revenue in Consumer with annual contractual price rises being aided by higher roaming and increased FTTP connections, partly offset by legacy product declines and a one-off revenue adjustment in Business. You can read more details about CFU performance on pages 56 to 57. 1,2,3
Adjusted EBITDA (£m)
Definition
This measures our earnings before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures.
Performance
Adjusted EBITDA was £8,100m (FY23: £7,928m). The increase was primarily due to revenue flow through and cost control more than offsetting cost inflation and one-off items; Openreach and Consumer delivered strong EBITDA growth, partially offset by EBITDA decline in Business due to increased input costs and legacy high-margin managed contract declines. You can read more on page 52. 1,2,3
Normalised free cash flow b (£m)
Definition
This measures free cash flow (net cash inflow from operating activities after capital expenditure) after adjusting for a number of measures, the largest being net interest paid, payments of lease liabilities, pension deficit payments, specific items and net cash flows related to the sale of contracts assets. For a full definition refer to page 232.
Performance
We generated £1,280m of normalised free cash flow (FY23: £1,328m). This was down 4% from last year and reflects working capital timing and a prior year tax refund, offset by EBITDA growth and lower capital expenditure. 1,2,3
Reported capital expenditure (£m)
Definition
This measures additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets during the year. See note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation to the measures reported the group accounts.
Performance
Reported capital expenditure was £4,880m (FY23: £5,056m). The decrease was the result of lower networks spend despite higher FTTP build in the year due to reduced unit costs and efficiencies. 1,2,3
Return on capital employed (ROCE) (%)
Definition
ROCE is adjusted earnings before interest and tax as a percentage of equity, debt and debt-like liabilities excluding balances associated with tax and management of financial risk. For a full definition and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure see page 232.
Performance
ROCE for the year was 8.5% (FY23: 8.3%). This is primarily due to slightly higher adjusted earnings offset by increased capital employed which reflects higher debt to fund our fibre build programme. 1,2,3
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 48
We use ten KPIs - five operational and five financial. We reconcile the financial measures to the closest IFRS measure on pages 230 to 233.
| FY24 | FY23 | FY22 | FY21 | FY20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported revenue (£m) | 20,797 | 20,681 | 20,850 | 21,331 | 22,905 |
| Adjusted EBITDA (£m) | 8,100 | 7,928 | 7,577 | 7,415 | 7,907 |
| Normalised free cash flow b (£m) | 1,280 | 1,328 | 1,392 | 1,459 | 2,011 |
| Reported capital expenditure (£m) | 4,880 | 5,056 | 5,286 | 4,216 | 3,960 |
| Return on capital employed (ROCE) (%) | 8.5 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 8.6 | 10.2 |
| FY24 | FY23 | FY22 | FY21 | FY20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT Group Net Promoter Score (NPS) point increase/(decrease) | 1.0 | (1.0) | 2.3 | 7.8 | 5.5 |
| Total Openreach FTTP connections (m) | 4.7 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| Total 5G subscriptions (m) | 11.1 | 8.6 | 5.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| Percentage reduction in carbon emissions intensity (% reduction) | 61 % | 55 % | 55 % | 57 % | 43 % |
| Units on legacy (m) | 6.5 | 10.6 | 11.6 | 14.2 | 16.2 |
BT Group Net Promoter Score (NPS) point increase/(decrease)
Definition
This tracks changes in our customers’ perceptions of BT Group since we launched the measure in April 2016. It s a combined measure of ‘promoters’ minus ‘detractors’ across our business units. BT Group NPS measures the net promoter score in our retail business c and net satisfaction in our wholesale business.
Performance
BT Group NPS increased by 1.0 point, (FY23: down 1.0 point) as we continue to focus on creating standout customer experiences with perceptions improving for Consumer, Business and Openreach. You can read more about these and our approach to customer experience on pages 26 to 27. 2
Total Openreach FTTP connections (m)
Definition
This tracks how many premises are connected to Openreach’s full fibre (FTTP) network.
Performance
4.7m customers were connected to Openreach’s FTTP network at 31 March 2024 (FY23: 3.1m). Openreach’s full fibre footprint reaches nearly 14mhomes with a further 6m where initial build isunderway, and we’re heading towards 25m premises by the end of 2026. You can read more about the full fibre rollout on page 20. 1
Total 5G subscriptions (m)
Definition
This measures the number of BT retail customers who have a 5G subscription.
Performance
11.1m BT retail customers are able to connect to our 5G network at 31 March 2024 (FY23: 8.6m). Wecontinue to expand our 5G network which now covers 75% of the UK population. You can read more on our 5G coverage and rollout on page 20. 1
Percentage reduction in carbon emissions intensity (% reduction)
Definition
This measures performance against our target to cut carbon emissions intensity by 87% by the end of March 2031 compared to FY17 levels. It’s measured by reference to tonnes of CO 2 e (carbon dioxide equivalent) per £m value added (adjusted EBITDA plus employee costs).
Performance
Against our carbon emission intensity reduction target this year we achieved a 61% reduction from our baseline year (FY17) (FY23 d : 55%). You can find more information on what we’re doing to tackle environmental challenges and our journey to net zero emissions on pages 37 to 39. 3
Units on legacy (m)
Definition
This tracks customer migrations from legacy to strategic network platforms, which enables our legacy platforms to be decommissioned. A ‘unit’ is a circuit within, or a connection to our network.
Performance
Since announcing our transformation in FY20, we have reduced the number of legacy connections by nearly 60% by migrating customers to Digital Voice, 4/5G and Fibre broadband. 2,3
Link to strategy
Each KPI measures how we’re doing against at least one of our strategic pillars. You can read more about these, and our progress against them, from page 19.
1_Build the strongest foundations
2_Create standout customer experiences
3_Lead the way to a bright, sustainablefuture
Link to directors’ remuneration
The annual bonus and long-term incentive plans that comprise our directors’ remuneration are each linked to certain KPIs. See the Report on directors’ remuneration on pages 106 to 124.
a Adjusted EBITDA is defined as the group profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures, as explained on page 232.
b Normalised free cash flow as defined on page 232.
c Includes our Consumer brands as well as Business unit excluding Wholesale.
d Restated from 56% as presented in the FY23 Annual Report following review of our carbon emissions.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 49
| FY24 | FY23 | FY22 | FY21 | FY20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital expenditure d (£m) | 4,880 | 5,056 | 5,286 | 4,216 | 3,960 |
| Revenue £m | 20,797 | 20,681 | 20,850 | 21,331 | 22,905 |
| Profit before tax £m | 1,186 | 1,729 | 1,186 | 1,729 | 2,701 |
| Adjusted EBITDA £m | 8,100 | 7,928 | 7,577 | 7,415 | 7,907 |
| Operating cash flow £m | 5,953 | 6,724 | 5,953 | 6,724 | 7,906 |
| Normalised free cash flow b (£m) | 1,280 | 1,328 | 1,392 | 1,459 | 2,011 |
| Net debt c (£m) | 19,479 | 18,859 | 19,479 | 18,859 | 20,343 |
| Earnings per share pence | 8.7p | 19.4p | 8.7p | 19.4p | 36.2p |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 50
| FY24 | FY23 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital expenditure d (£m) | 4,880 | 5,056 | (3)% |
| Revenue £m | 20,797 | 20,681 | 1% |
| Profit before tax £m | 1,186 | 1,729 | (31)% |
| Adjusted EBITDA £m | 8,100 | 7,928 | 2% |
| Operating cash flow £m | 5,953 | 6,724 | (11)% |
| Normalised free cash flow b (£m) | 1,280 | 1,328 | (4)% |
| Net debt c (£m) | 19,479 | 18,859 | £620m |
| Earnings per share pence | 8.7p | 19.4p |
| Result | Performance against financial outlook | Change in adjusted e revenue | Growth on a Sport JV pro forma g basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EBITDA | In line | Up 1% | Up 1% |
| Capital expenditure d | Better | c.£5.0bn | £4.9bn |
| Normalised free cash flow b | Toward the top end of £1.0-1.2bn | £1.3bn | Better |
| Reported revenue | Up 1%; and adjusted e revenue was up 2% on a Sports JV pro forma g basis |
Reported revenue was £20,797m, up 1%; and adjusted e revenue was up 2% on a Sports JV pro forma g basis due to price increases and fibre-enabled product sales in Openreach, increased service revenue in Consumer with annual contractual price rises being aided by higher roaming and increased FTTP connections, partlyoffset by legacy product declines and a one-off revenue adjustment in Business (see note 5 to the consolidated financialstatements). Adjusted EBITDA of £8,100m was up 2%; adjusted EBITDA wasup 1% on a Sports JV pro forma g basis, with revenue flow through and cost control more than offsetting cost inflation andone-off items. We have recognised a non-cash impairment of goodwill allocated to Business of £488m as a specific item, reflecting a decline in profitability in recent years. Reported profit before tax of £1,186m was down 31%, primarily due to impairment of goodwill, increased depreciation, amortisation and pension interest expense, partially offset by adjusted EBITDA growth. Capital expenditure d of £4,880m was down 3%, primarily driven bylower networks spend despite higher FTTP build in the year dueto reduced unit costs and efficiencies; cash capex of £4,969mwas down 6%.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 50Normalised free cash flow b was £1,280m, down 4% due to working-capital timing and a prior year tax refund, partly offset by EBITDA growth and lower capital expenditure.
Despite challenging macroeconomic conditions, cost of living challenges and a highly competitive market for connectivity services, we are still well positioned to deliver consistent and predictable growth and value through delivery of our focused strategy. Our outlook is underpinned by confidence in our unrivalled assets, leading network position, strong brands, ever-improving customer experience and continued focus on transformation.
In FY25 we expect adjusted revenue growth of 0-1.0% and EBITDA of around £8.2bn. Capital expenditure excluding spectrum will be less than £4.8bn, with normalised free cash flow of around £1.5bn.
From FY26 to FY30, we expect consistent and predictable revenue growth and EBITDA growth ahead of revenue, enhanced by cost transformation. Capital expenditure will remain at less than £4.8bn until FY26 before reducing by c.£1bn post peak FTTP build. We expect to deliver c.£2.0bn in normalised free cash flow in FY27 and c.£3.0bn by the end of the decade.
---|---|---
Change in adjusted revenue | 0 - 1.0% | Consistent and predictable growth
Adjusted EBITDA | c.£8.2bn | Consistent and predictable growth ahead of revenue enhanced by cost transformation
Capital expenditure | <£4.8bn | <£4.8bn to FY26 Reduces by c.£1bn post peak FTTP build rate
Normalised free cash flow | c.£1.5bn | c.£2.0bn in FY27 c.£3.0bn by end of decade
We have declared a final dividend of 5.69 pence per share (pps), increasing the full year dividend to 8.00pps, a year-on-year increase of 3.9% (FY23: 7.70pps). We reconfirm our progressive dividend policy which is to maintain or grow the dividend each year whilst taking into consideration a number of factors including underlying medium-term earnings expectations and levels of business reinvestment. The Board expects to continue with this policy for future years, and to declare two dividends per year with the interim dividend being fixed at 30% of the prior year’s full year dividend.
Simon Lowth
Chief Financial Officer
15 May 2024
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 51
a Adjusted EBITDA is defined as the group profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures, as explained on page 232.
b Normalised free cash flow as defined on page 232.
c Net debt as defined on page 231.
d Additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in the period. See note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation.
e Adjusted measures exclude specific items, as explained on page 231.
f Financial outlook originally provided in May 2023 was updated in November 2023 to clarify capital expenditure of c£5.0bn and normalised free cash flow at the top end of the £1.0-£1.2bn range.
g On 1 September 2022 BT Group and Warner Bros. Discovery announced completion of their transaction to form a 50:50 joint venture (JV) combining the assets of BT Sport and Eurosport UK. Financial information stated as pro forma is unaudited and is presented to estimate the impact on the group as if trading in relation to BT Sport had been equity accounted for in previous periods, akin to the JV being in place historically. Please refer to Additional Information on page 233 for a bridge between financial information on a reported basis and a Sports JV pro forma basis, which shows a decrease of £238m to adjusted revenue and increase of £71m to adjusted EBITDA.
| Year ended 31 March (£m) | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 20,797 | 20,681 |
| Operating costs a | (13,185) | (13,244) |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (5,398) | (4,818) |
| Operating profit | 2,214 | 2,619 |
| Net finance expense | (1,007) | (831) |
| Share of post tax profit/(loss) of associates and ventures | (21) | (59) |
| Profit before tax | 1,186 | 1,729 |
| Tax | (331) | 176 |
| Profit for the period | 855 | 1,905 |
Reported revenue was £20,797m, up 1% due to fibre-enabled product sales and price increases in Openreach, increased service revenue in Consumer driven by contractual price rises, partly offset by the prior year removal of BT Sport revenue and legacy product declines and a one off revenue adjustment in Business (see note 5 to the consolidated financial statements). Revenue was up 2% on a Sports JV pro forma e basis. You can find details of revenue by CFU on pages 56 to 57. Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements shows a full breakdown of revenue by all our major product and service categories.
Reported operating costs were £18,583m, up 3% year-on-year due to the goodwill impairment (see page 53), excluding this costs are flat with tight cost control and the removal of BT Sport rights and production costs, partly offset by cost inflation and one-off items. We have now achieved our £3bn cost savings target 12 months early at a cost to achieve of £1.5bn, £0.1bn lower than target (FY23: achieved gross annualised savings of £2.1bn and costs of £1.1bn).The cumulative cash costs incurred amount to £1.5bn (FY23: £1.1bn). Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements shows a detailed breakdown of our operating costs.
Adjusted EBITDA of £8,100m, up 2%, primarily driven by revenue flow through and cost control more than offsetting cost inflation and one-off items; Openreach and Consumer delivered strong EBITDA growth, partially offset by EBITDA decline in Business due to increased input costs and legacy high-margin managed contract declines. Adjusted EBITDA was up 1% on a Sports JV pro forma e basis. You can find details of adjusted EBITDA by CFU on pages 56 to 57.
Reported profit before tax of £1,186m was down 31%, primarily due to impairment of goodwill, increased depreciation, amortisation and pension interest expense, partially offset by adjusted EBITDA growth.
As we explain on page 230, we separately identify and disclose those items that in management’s judgement need to be disclosed by virtue of their size, nature or incidence. We call these specific items. Specific items are used to derive the adjusted results as presented in the consolidated income statement. Adjusted results are consistent with the way that financial performance is measured by management and assists in providing an additional analysis of the reported trading results of the group.
Specific items resulted in a net charge after tax of £963m (FY23: £253m). The main components were goodwill impairment of £488m (FY23: £nil), restructuring charges of £388m (FY23: £300m) and interest expense on retirement benefit obligation of £121m (FY23: £18m); partly offset by a tax credit on specific items of £145m (FY23: credit of £308m). Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements shows the full details of all revenues and costs that we have treated as specific items.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 52
| 18,062 | |
|---|---|
| (354) | |
| (127) | |
| (24) | |
| (76) | |
| 96 | |
| 206 | |
| 273 | |
| 146 | |
| 381 | |
| 18,583 |
The effective tax rate on reported profit was 27.9% (FY23: negative 10.2%) which is higher than the UK corporation tax rate of 25% primarily due to a non-deductible goodwill impairment, partly offset by the UK patent box regime, which taxes some of our UK profits at 10%. The FY23 rate was lower due to the previous super deduction regime, the non-taxable gain on the revaluation and disposal of the BT Sports business and the lower UK corporation tax rate of 19%. The effective tax rate on adjusted profit was 20.7% (FY23: 5.8%) for the same reasons.
At the end of FY24, we had c.£11bn (FY23: c.£8bn) of carried forward UK tax losses. We made income tax payments of £59m (FY23: £136m refund). Our tax expense recognised in the income statement before specific items was £476m (FY23: £132m). We also recognised a £678m tax credit (FY23: £642m tax credit) in the statement of comprehensive income, mainly relating to the increase in our IAS 19 deficit. We expect our sustainable effective tax rate before specific items to be around the UK rate of corporation tax, as we do most of our business in the UK.
Reported earnings per share was 8.7p, down 10.7p, while adjusted earnings per share was 18.5p, down 3.5p.
Capital expenditure was £4,880m (FY23: £5,056m), down 3% primarily driven by lower network spend despite higher FTTP build in the year, due to reduced unit costs and efficiencies. Cash capital expenditure was down 6% at £4,969m, with the difference to reported capital expenditure primarily representing the timing of government grant funding repayments.
Net cash inflow from operating activities was £5,953m, down 11%. Normalised free cash flow d was £1,280m, down 4% primarily due to working capital timing and a prior year tax refund, offsetting EBITDA growth and lower cash capital expenditure.
Year-on-year net working capital includes £(506)m from lower utilisation of a supply chain financing programme offset by £305m from the sale of cash flows of contract assets relating to mobile handsets and £105m as a prepayment for the forward sale of copper. You can see a reconciliation to normalised free cash flow d from net cash inflow from operating activities (the most directly comparable IFRS measure) on page 232. The net cash cost of specific items adjusted from normalised free cash flow d was £439m (FY23: £404m), primarily relating to restructuring payments.
Our joint venture with Warner Bros. Discovery (‘Sports JV’), which has been rebranded to TNT Sports during the year, continues to deliver a compelling sports offering after extending Premier League rights and adding the FA Cup to its comprehensive line-up of premium content.# Strategic report
Underlying trading operations in FY24 were profitable but we recognised a share of losses after tax of £41m after adjustments made to align with the group’s accounting policies.
We perform an annual goodwill impairment review by reference to the value in use of our cash generating units (CGUs) which represent the smallest identifiable groups of assets that generate independent cash inflows. Our CGUs are deemed to be Consumer and Business. Our FY24 impairment testing exercise concluded that there is significant headroom in our Consumer CGU, consistent with FY23. The carrying amount of goodwill allocated to this CGU at 31 March 2024 was £3.9bn (FY23: £3.9bn). The carrying value of the Business CGU exceeded its value in use by £488m. We have therefore booked an impairment charge equivalent to this amount (FY23: £nil). The charge has been recognised as a specific item. After impairment, the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the Business CGU at 31 March 2024 was £3.6bn (FY23: £4.1bn). Of the £4.1bn in FY23, £2.6bn relates to the acquisition of EE in 2016 with the rest relating to historical small acquisitions. For more information see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 53
a Excluding depreciation and amortisation.
b Adjusted measures exclude specific items, as explained on page 230.
c Adjusted EBITDA is defined as the group profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures, as explained on page 231.
d Normalised free cash flow as defined on page 232.
e On 1 September 2022 BT Group and Warner Bros. Discovery announced completion of their transaction to form a 50:50 joint venture (JV) combining the assets of BT Sport and Eurosport UK. Financial information stated as pro forma is unaudited and is presented to estimate the impact on the group as if trading in relation to BT Sport had been equity accounted for in previous periods, akin to the JV being in place historically. Please refer to Additional Information on page 233 for a bridge between financial information on a reported basis and a Sports JV pro forma basis, which shows a decrease of £238m to adjusted revenue and increase of £71m to adjusted EBITDA.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | £m | £m |
| Intangible assets | 12,920 | 13,687 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 22,562 | 21,667 |
| Right-of-use assets | 3,642 | 3,981 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 1,070 | 1,479 |
| Joint ventures and associates | 307 | 359 |
| Preference shares in joint ventures | 533 | 555 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 414 | 392 |
| Investments | 2,395 | 3,577 |
| Trade and other receivables | 4,206 | 3,563 |
| Contract assets | 1,740 | 1,934 |
| Deferred tax assets | 1,048 | 709 |
| Other current and non-current assets | 902 | 849 |
| Total assets | 51,739 | 52,752 |
| Loans and other borrowings | 18,526 | 18,521 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 539 | 383 |
| Trade and other payables | 6,964 | 7,484 |
| Contract liabilities | 1,081 | 1,052 |
| Lease liabilities | 4,955 | 5,359 |
| Provisions | 649 | 598 |
| Retirement benefit obligations | 4,882 | 3,139 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,533 | 1,620 |
| Other current and non-current liabilities | 92 | 82 |
| Total liabilities | 39,221 | 38,238 |
| Total equity | 12,518 | 14,514 |
The IAS 19 deficit has increased to £4.8bn at 31 March 2024, net of tax £3.8bn (FY23: £3.1bn, net of tax £2.5bn), mainly due to the increase in real interest rates and narrowing of credit spreads over the period, partly offset by our scheduled contributions. The BT Pension Scheme (BTPS) hedges inflation and interest rate risk with reference to the funding deficit, which has resulted in the BTPS being over hedged on an IAS 19 measure. In addition, the IAS 19 liabilities are set by reference to corporate bond yields. The increase in real yields and narrowing of credit spreads over the period have therefore led to an increase in the IAS 19 deficit, partly offset by scheduled contributions of £0.8bn. The impact of these factors is different for the funding valuation deficit. The 2023 BTPS funding valuation included a future funding commitment for BT to provide additional deficit contributions should the funding deficit be more than £1bn behind plan at two consecutive semi-annual assessment dates. At the 31 December 2023 assessment date, the funding position was within this limit. Further details of the BTPS triennial review can be found in note 19 – Retirement benefit plans on page 185 and in the Section 172 statement on page 93. The movements in the deficit for the group’s defined benefit plans are shown below:
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 54
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Opening balance (net of tax) | 2.5 |
| Service cost | 0.6 |
| Net interest expense | 1.0 |
| Remeasurements (loss) | (0.9) |
| Contributions | (1.2) |
| Past service cost | 0.5 |
| Closing balance (net of tax) | 3.8 |
Net financial debt (which excludes lease liabilities) at 31 March 2024 was £14.5bn (31 March 2023: £13.5bn), increasing mainly due to our scheduled pension scheme contributions of £0.8bn. Net debt b (which includes lease liabilities) was £19.5bn (31 March 2023: £18.9bn). The difference to the movement in net financial debt reflects lease movements. BT Group holds cash and current investment balances of £2.8bn; the current portion of loans and other borrowings is £1.4bn. Our £2.1bn revolving credit facility, which matures in March 2027, remains undrawn at 31 March 2024. We remain committed to our credit rating target of BBB+ and minimum rating of BBB. During FY24 all of the major agencies confirmed their ratings at BBB or equivalent with stable outlook
Our principal undiscounted contractual financial obligations as at 31 March 2024 are as follows:
We have unused committed borrowing facilities totalling £2.1bn. We expect that these resources, combined with the future cash we generate, will allow us to settle our obligations as they fall due. Notes 15, 19, 26 and 31 to the consolidated financial statements give further information on these items.
The graph below shows the maturity profile of our term debt. Currency denominated balances are translated to sterling at swapped rates where hedged. Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements gives more information on our debt arrangements.
| Maturity | £ debt | € swapped to £ | $ debt swapped to £ | JPY swapped to £ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 | 740 | |||
| FY26 | 566 | |||
| FY27 | 2,012 | |||
| FY28 | 372 | |||
| FY29 | 1,611 | |||
| FY30 | 1,293 | |||
| FY31 | 548 | |||
| FY32 | 447 | |||
| FY33 | 777 | |||
| FY34 | 673 | |||
| FY35 | 1,604 | |||
| FY36 | 498 | |||
| FY37 | 372 | |||
| FY38 | 716 | |||
| FY39 | 1,155 | |||
| FY40 | 719 | |||
| FY41 | ||||
| FY42 | 442 | |||
| FY43 | ||||
| FY44 | 741 | |||
| FY45 | 64 | |||
| FY46 | ||||
| FY47 | ||||
| FY48 | 247 | |||
| FY49 | ||||
| FY50 | 389 |
We spent £133m (FY23: £138m) on our share buyback programme. We received proceeds of £57m (FY23: £5m) from colleagues exercising their share options.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 55
a Primarily reflects the impact on the liabilities of actual inflation being higher than assumed at the prior reporting date, which has been broadly offset by increases to inflation-linked assets from higher inflation.
b Loans and other borrowings and lease liabilities (both current and non-current), less current asset investments and cash and cash equivalents, including items which have been classified as held for sale on the balance sheet. Currency denominated balances within net debt are translated to sterling at swapped rates where hedged. Fair value adjustments and accrued interest applied to reflect the effective interest method are removed. Amounts due to joint ventures held within loans and borrowings are also excluded. Please refer to note 26 of the consolidated financial statements for reconciliation from nearest IFRS measure.
BT Group consists of customer-facing units (CFUs), technology units, and corporate units, as described on page 11. We have three CFUs – Consumer, Business and Openreach. Business started reporting as a combined unit from the start of the financial year. The comparative results for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business CFU and for changes to the methodology we use to allocate shared central costs. See note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for more information, and note 32 for a bridge to previously presented financial information.
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted a revenue | £9,833m | £9,737m | £96m |
| Adjusted a operating profit | £934m | £866m | £68m |
| Year ended 31 March | £m | £m | £m |
| Adjusted a revenue | 9,833 | 9,737 | 96 |
| Adjusted a operating costs | 7,161 | 7,268 | (107) |
| Adjusted b EBITDA | 2,672 | 2,469 | 203 |
| Depreciation & amortisation a | 1,738 | 1,603 | 135 |
| Adjusted a operating profit | 934 | 866 | 68 |
| Capital expenditure | 1,175 | 1,221 | (46) |
| Normalised free cash flow c | 1,023 | 963 | 60 |
| Pro forma d adjusted revenue | 9,833 | 9,499 | 334 |
| Pro forma d adjusted EBITDA | 2,672 | 2,540 | 132 |
| Pro forma d adjusted capital expenditure | 1,175 | 1,221 | (46) |
| Pro forma d adjusted normalised free cash flow | 1,023 | 1,086 | (63) |
Adjusted a revenue growth of 4% on a pro forma d basis was driven by service revenue growth from the annual contractual price rise, increased roaming and increased FTTP connections. This was partially offset by a decline in voice revenues and continued handset to SIM-only migration. Adjusted a revenue was up 1% as per above offset by the BT Sport disposal in the prior year. Adjusted b EBITDA growth of 5% on a pro forma d basis with the growth in service revenue offset by higher input costs and prior year one-off items. Adjusted b EBITDA was up 8% due to revenue growth and rights and production cost savings from the BT Sport disposal. Depreciation and amortisation a was up, driven by higher mobile network, digital and customer equipment investment.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 56
| Adjusted a revenue | Adjusted a operating profit |
|---|---|
| £8,128m (2)% | £646m (28)% |
| 2024 | 2023 |
| £m | £m |
| Adjusted a revenue | 8,128 |
| Adjusted a operating costs | 6,498 |
| Adjusted b EBITDA | 1,630 |
| Depreciation & amortisation a | 984 |
| Adjusted a operating profit | 646 |
| Capital expenditure | 775 |
| Normalised free cash flow c | 431 |
Adjusted a revenue decline of 2% was driven by declines in legacy products and managed contracts, adverse foreign exchange, a one-off revenue adjustment and prior year one-offs. This was partially offset by continued trading momentum further enhanced by inflation-linked price rises in Small and Medium Business (SMB), and growth in Security. Adjusted b EBITDA decline of 16% was due to higher input costs driven by inflation, the flow through of high margin legacy declines and one-offs. This was partially offset by the ongoing benefit of cost transformation and revenue growth in SMB and Security. Depreciation and amortisation a decline was driven primarily by the timing of asset recognition in the prior year. Capital expenditure was down due to higher customer project spend in the prior year. Normalised free cash flow c declined mainly due to lower adjusted b EBITDA and the timing of working capital, partially offset by lower capital expenditure. Retail order intake was £6.2bn on a 12-month rolling basis, down 1%.
| Adjusted a revenue | Adjusted a operating profit |
|---|---|
| £6,077m 7% | £1,775m 15% |
| 2024 | 2023 |
| £m | £m |
| Adjusted a revenue | 6,077 |
| Adjusted a operating costs | 2,250 |
| Adjusted b EBITDA | 3,827 |
| Depreciation & amortisation a | 2,052 |
| Adjusted a operating profit | 1,775 |
| Capital expenditure | 2,845 |
| Normalised free cash flow c | 590 |
Adjusted a revenue growth of 7% was driven by CPI linked price increases, growth in FTTP broadband base and growth in the Ethernet base. This was partially offset by declines in the base of broadband and voice only lines. The fibre-enabled base grew; offset by declines in the copper base. Adjusted b EBITDA growth of 9% was driven by revenue flow through, improved cost transformation including lower staff numbers, partially offset by pay inflation, higher energy costs and higher FTTP provision volumes. Depreciation and amortisation a was up driven by increased networkbuild. Capital expenditure was broadly flat with lower FTTP build unit cost partially offset by higher FTTP build and provision volumes. Normalised free cash flow c increase was driven by higher adjusted b EBITDA and copper forward sales, partially offset by the timing of working capital. Openreach broadband ARPU grew by 10% year-on-year due to price rises and increased volumes of FTTP.
a Adjusted measures exclude specific items, as explained on page 231.
b Adjusted EBITDA is defined as the group profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures, as explained on page 232.
c Normalised free cash flow as defined on page 232.
d On 1 September 2022 BT Group and Warner Bros. Discovery announced completion of their transaction to form a 50:50 joint venture (JV) combining the assets of BT Sport and Eurosport UK. Financial information stated as pro forma is unaudited and is presented to estimate the impact on the group as if trading in relation to BT Sport had been equity accounted for in previous periods, akin to the JV being in place historically. Please refer to Additional Information on page 233 for a bridge between financial information on a reported basis and a Sports JV pro forma basis, which shows a decrease of £238m to adjusted revenue, an increase of £71m to adjusted EBITDA and an increase of £123m to normalised free cash flow.
Openreach continue to build full fibre at pace – creating the next generation of UK telecommunications. Ofcom continue to monitor these activities as they start work on reviewing the regulatory framework for2026-31. We believe the current approach is working well. It’s delivering a competitive market and good outcomes for customers. In May 2023 Ofcom approved our Equinox2 pricing offer. The next stage ofregulation must consider how to achievethe full benefits of fibre investment through closing the old, coppernetworks it replaces. Our more regional focus to rolling out Digital Voice services is helping us work closer with customers to support them with this switch. A successful rollout has to work for everyone – as shown by industry’s recent commitments on telecare and vulnerable customers. Orders for broadband Universal Service are falling as we connect more eligible homes. The Government is currently consulting on how to serve ‘very hard to reach’ customers as well as the overall future of Universal Service. We recognise Universal Service is a vital safety net for some customers. But we think its scope and detail isn’t always proportionate to the number of homes itapplies to. The continued transformation of UK networks means increased scrutiny from Government and Ofcom on security and resilience. We’re continuing to work with all parties to apply the 2018 Telecoms Security Act and remove high-risk vendors from our core network. On 25 June 2023 we had a technical fault with the 999 service and there was a short time when calls couldn’t get through. We were – and still are – sincerely sorry for the distress this caused and are working closely with the ongoing investigation. We’re proud of our networks’ reliability. We welcome the chance to work with Ofcom as they consider resilience needs for the future. It’s important to our customers that we keep providing very reliable services at affordable prices.
In December 2023 Ofcom closed their enforcement programme into in-contract price variation terms, with no action taken on us. But recent inflation rises have raised concerns over the ‘CPI+’ pricing models our industry uses. Ofcom feel this can be confusing for customers. We’ve listened and are introducing a new consumer pricing model, switching from % figures and CPI to a clear and simple ‘pounds andpence’ view. Work on implementing one-touch switching continues across the industry. This will make it easier for customers to change providers. We always try to look after customers who have difficulty paying for services. We’ll continue providing affordable broadband and EE Mobile Basics products to eligible customers – and support vulnerable customers through careful judgements ondebt and disconnection. We still havemore customers on subsidised or social tariffs than the rest of the industrycombined a . We’re proud of our networks’ reliability. Wewelcome the chance towork with Ofcom as theyconsider resilience needs for the future. It’simportant to our customers that we keepproviding very reliable services at affordable prices.
a In line with the Policy, 50% of Simon’s annual bonus will be deferred into shares for three years.
Over the coming months and years, we look forward to working with Ofcom and Government on some of the wider questions about how to regulate our network and industry. We welcomed the conclusion of Ofcom’s Net Neutrality Review. It gave new guidance on traffic management and using network resources efficiently, giving us more flexibility in the products and services we can offer customers. There’s still more to be done – particularly on better sharing the cost of developing our network to handle significant volumes of content. As Vodafone and Three announce details of their proposed merger, we continue towatch developments and feed our viewsinto the process. It’s important theUK mobile market is effective and competitive, especially around upcomingspectrum auctions. We support the Department for Business and Trade’s work on ‘Smarter regulation’ inthe energy, water and telecoms sectors. In general we feel that our sector is well regulated – evidenced by big investment and competition over the past few years. But there’s always room to improve. We support introducing a ‘growth duty’ to make sure all regulatory interventions are considered (and reviewed) holistically.
We provide broadband for 72% of those in the UK who take social tariffs.
72%
Reflecting on the year, it’s clear that Openreach is doing exactly what we setout to do for all our stakeholders. Underpinned by government policy and regulation, we’re upgrading the UK’s broadband infrastructure at record pace. Competitors have made progress. Marketgrowth and inflation have been challenging. Yet Openreach’s performancehas again been strong.# A message from the Chair of Openreach
As the UK’s largest wholesale broadband company, we’re continuing to invest in Ultrafast Full Fibre technology. From rural villages to city centres, we’ve now passed more than 13.8 million homes and businesses. We’re still heading towards 25 million by the end of 2026 – and we plan to keep going, reaching up to 30m by the end of the decade. But we’ve always said that building the network isn’t the end goal. We need customers to connect to it and get the benefits. That’s why I’m really pleased to see 4.7m customers already upgraded and enjoying our new platform while we continue to drive down costs and improve the service we give them.
People are spending more time than ever online, and what we deliver is important to them. We have a clear focus: delivering great service, building full fibre at pace across the UK and upgrading customers to our best available network. Openreach isn’t just meeting the high bar Ofcom has set – we’re setting our own, even higher, standards. Our Net Promoter Score (an assessment direct from customers) has improved by 19.5% to 50.2% over the past year, while our Trustpilot score is now ‘Excellent’ at 4.6. With fibre fault rates also lower than copper, there’s strong momentum in improving customer experience, but there’s always more to do.
We sped up our build rate again this year, to a peak of one million homes and businesses in the final quarter. By harnessing innovation and efficiencies in our supply chain, we’ve also been driving down the cost of reaching each premises a achieving FTTP build costs per home at the lower end of the £250 – £350 range. To that end, the value and quality of our product helps us stand out in a competitive market. Our Equinox 2 pricing offer has now been taken up by all our major customers – with the ability to fulfil over 36,000 orders every week. A brilliant start.
Openreach will always be a people business, and our investment in ensuring our people have the right skills to deliver for our customers continues. As more customers move to reliable full fibre services, we’ll need fewer engineers to support them because it’s a more dependable platform. To that end, we’ve stopped backfilling certain roles when people leave or retire and we’re continuing to flex our reliance on subcontractors. We’re also retraining copper engineers with fibre skills and our desk-based teams are exploiting new systems and AI applications. We’re also becoming more inclusive as we try to better represent the communities we serve. Our People Networks are growing, continuing to create a safe space for minority colleagues and challenge us on the environment we create for all colleagues.
We know our operations affect the environment. We’ve distilled our sustainability objectives into three aims to help us focus. We want to lower our carbon footprint, use fewer materials and cut waste, and make a positive impact on nature. We’re progressing well. We’re converting our diesel van fleet to electric vehicles – with more than 4,100 already on the road. And last year we recycled around 4,300 tons of copper. But there is still a long way to go. Keeping colleagues, partners and the public safe is paramount. Almost everyone at Openreach has now completed our day-long ‘Hearts and Minds’ safety programme – a massive investment to refocus our culture on physical and mental wellbeing. We’re also keeping up our work to move network assets away from high voltage poles, with the project now completed.
As BT Group’s deadline for retiring the analogue PSTN approaches, we’ve become more aware that wholesale customers need support and encouragement to switch to Digital Voice services. We welcome new industry commitments on better protecting vulnerable customers and will carry on facilitating upgrades. As more people move to full fibre we’ll also need fewer exchanges across the UK. Exiting these buildings is challenging and will take many years. But it will help the industry be more cost and energy efficient so we’re working closely with CPs to plan and manage this change.
Finally, it’s worth reflecting on the success of the sector. A combination of UK Government tax policy and Ofcom’s Wholesale Fixed Telecoms Market Review (WFTMR) have driven investment and fierce competition across our industry. An alt-net community – with access to our ducts and poles – has added to an already strong retail market. This is leading to better outcomes and giving customers an even wider choice of offers, products and services. The framework is working. But the business case for full fibre investments still stretches to nearly 20 years, so what everyone needs is a continued period of regulatory and Government policy stability. Meanwhile, technology change keeps getting faster and there’ll be increasing challenges to reach more rural, isolated communities. Our focus will be on upgrading as many customers as possible. And – with our unrivalled track record in rural connectivity – we’re looking forward to playing our part in the Government’s Project Gigabit programme. We’re doing well, and that wouldn’t be possible without our people. So I want to thank all of our colleagues who’ve worked tirelessly to maintain that momentum this year.
Mike McTighe
Chair, Openreach
15 May 2024
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 60
Strategic report
a For our commercial build programme only. Excludes new sites.
Risk management is integral to our business and to achieving our strategic priorities. Our risk management framework makes sure that we manage risks in a smart and structured way. It helps us reach our goals, deliver our strategy, support our business model and protect our assets – while leading the way to a bright, sustainable future. We align risk management activities with our strategic framework, business planning and performance management. This helps integrate risk thinking into key decision- making areas. It also makes sure we share information in a joined-up way for the biggest impact.
We divide our risk landscape into 16 Group Risk Categories (GRCs) of enduring risks – like People and Cyber Security – that will not change significantly over time and can be managed consistently across the organisation. For each GRC we set our risk appetite. That is how much risk we’re willing to take, underpinned by metrics with upper and lower limits which set our tolerance. We manage enduring risks within each GRC through clear policies complemented by standards and a group-wide Key Control Framework. We use a ‘three lines of defence’ model to define clear roles and responsibilities, coordinate assurance activities and give confidence to stakeholders that we’re managing risks effectively.
We’re also aware of – and act on – current, specific risks and uncertainties which are important at a point in time and dynamic in nature. We categorise these as:
We align these types of risks to a GRC based on their causes and consequences. For point risks, we assess their potential impacts and likelihood, assign management ownership and decide how to best manage the risks. We keep monitoring risks and action plans – making changes like agreeing new actions as needed. We also assess emerging risks but with different criteria. We look at potential impacts, level of preparedness and the time horizon. Reflecting that emerging risks are uncertain, we also consider those that may occur in the longer term (more than three years). Some emerging risks are more ambiguous and broader than others, needing coordinated, cross-group assessment and action. We use our emerging risk hubs when considering these risks. They bring together cross-functional representatives to share intelligence, identify potential trade-offs and agree actions.
Ultimately, the Board has overall responsibility for risk management. On the Board’s behalf, the Audit and Risk Committee provides oversight of and monitors the effectiveness of our risk management and internal controls systems. Twice a year, the Board gets a summary of how we’re managing key risks across all GRCs. The Audit and Risk Committee also holds discussions with Executive Committee members to conduct deep dives into specific GRCs across the year. Each GRC has an Executive Committee sponsor. They set our risk appetite, how we measure our exposure to that risk, and how we manage it within our target tolerance. This provides accountability, ‘tone from the top’ and joined-up risk thinking.
Each unit leadership team regularly reviews, discusses, prioritises and acts on risks, aligned to GRCs. This drives conversations about risk management across every part of the organisation leading to risk-informed decisions and better business outcomes. We have oversight bodies in place at both unit and group level – where key risk information gets reported regularly. Our leaders promote a mindset of being smart with risk when making decisions. Our code sets expected behaviours for all our colleagues. Ongoing training and formally defined risk management roles also help weave risk awareness into our culture.
Our risk management tool, ARTEMIS, helps us consistently apply our risk, control and assurance frameworks across BT Group. It links risks with the relevant controls and assurance outcomes. It also simplifies and standardises reporting. This helps us to make sure we’re managing risks in a joined-up and consistent way.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
Risk management taken seriously, and done simply and consistently, helps us make the best decisions for our colleagues, customers, shareholders and wider stakeholders in the face of uncertainty. It is fundamental to our strategy and performance. Our leaders promote a mindset of being smart with risk when making decisions. Our code sets expected behaviours for all our colleagues. Ongoing training and formally defined risk management roles also help weave risk awareness into our culture.
We keep strengthening how we apply our risk management framework, in step with our changing business and risk landscape. This year we launched two new training modules covering the basics of our framework and the behaviours we expect from our leaders. We rolled them out across our senior leadership team and everyone involved in making our framework a success. The training helped everyone understand the expectations and benefits risk management brings to BT Group. We continue to develop our key control framework, and this year was about embedding it consistently across the units with our leaders taking active ownership for the controls in their area, making it core to operations, decision making and mindset. We focused on two things:
We operate in a challenging external environment. Economic uncertainty, adverse market conditions, growing geopolitical tensions and more regulatory scrutiny are all impacting our risk exposure – meaning more focus and management. Below, we discuss some of the key changes to our risk landscape during the past 12 months.
AI and data use are growing fast and changing the way businesses operate. The regulatory landscape, technological advancements and public awareness are quickly evolving in step – with hard to predict outcomes. Generative AI has the potential to change the way we serve our customers and how our workplace looks. Whilst there is a lot of opportunity, it also means we need to carefully manage risks relating to procuring, developing, using and selling AI solutions. Managing AI risks cuts across many of our GRCs. For example, we need to ensure we invest in the right AI skills and capabilities. We must also apply responsible technology principles that maintain our stakeholders’ trust. The growing use of AI also means relying even more on data, which creates new challenges and risks. Given the synergies between the two, we’ve expanded our Data GRC to include both data and AI. This will let us use our risk management framework to make sure we have the right risk appetite, standards and key controls for increasingly material AI risks.
The market is filled with challenges around the macroeconomic environment, competitor movements, regulatory pressures and technological advances. We’re managing risks related to increasing competition in the broadband and mobile markets, while also navigating retail pricing pressures and making sure we treat all our customers fairly. We’re also closely monitoring and acting on the risks of disintermediation by hyperscalers as they introduce alternative technology solutions.
Geopolitical tensions and wars across the world – like in the South China Sea or Ukraine – create risks to businesses like ours. This year the conflict in the Middle East region has amplified a wide range of potential impacts, including disruption to suppliers, higher energy costs and increased cyber security threats. Geopolitical risks can change fast and affect various parts of our organisation. We use our emerging risk hub to bring together the right people to make action plans as these risks evolve.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 62
Strategic report
Risk management continued
AI Generative AI has the potential to change the way we serve our customers and how our workplace looks. The risks set out in the following pages align with our enduring Group Risk Categories (GRCs). Each GRC contains enduring risks, as well as examples of the current point and emerging risks. We also include the scenarios we’ve used for our viability analyses for each GRC.
Strategy, technology and competition
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 63
Strategic report
Financing
Sponsor: General Counsel, Company Secretary & Director Regulatory Affairs
What this category covers
We work with our regulators as they define clear, predictable and proportionate regulations to protect customers and society – while making sure service providers can compete fairly. We must comply with those regulations, maintain trust and strong relationships while delivering our vision and sustainable value growth.
Our risk appetite
We’re committed to adhering to regulations and having a strong compliance culture. It’s a fundamental part of connecting for good. We make decisions based on regulatory obligations. These include protecting our customers and network, while making sure we meet key stakeholders’ wider strategic business needs. We focus on maintaining long-term predictable and stable regulation.
Examples of dynamic risks
Examples of what we do to manage these risks
Scenario considered in viability analysis
Potential regulatory changes affecting our pricing arrangements.
Sponsor: Chief Digital and Innovation Officer
What this category covers
We must follow today’s global data regulations while anticipating and preparing for tomorrow’s. Our data and AI strategy aims to create value and enable efficiency, while giving us a robust framework for us to comply with data and AI governance and regulation. It also includes managing risks as we build AI solutions. Not following data protection laws or regulations or taking a responsible approach to AI could damage our reputation and stakeholder trust, harm colleagues, customers or suppliers and/or lead to litigation, fines and penalties.
Our risk appetite
We want to protect BT Group, colleagues, customers, partners and suppliers from breaches of data protection laws and regulations. We also want to harness our data to support and drive our objectives and realise opportunities. We can only achieve these aims with the right data ethics, governance, security, protection, responsible technology and compliance systems, processes and practices. Achieving our data goals may require appropriate interpretation of the varied global data protection laws, regulations and standards.
Examples of dynamic risks
Examples of what we do to manage these risks
Scenario considered in viability analysis
An AI-related data breach, leading to regulatory investigation, enforcement action and reputational damage.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 65
Sponsor: General Counsel, Company Secretary & Director Regulatory Affairs
What this category covers
Our main focus areas are anti-bribery and corruption, competition law, trade sanctions, export controls and corporate governance obligations. Other GRCs focus on complying with other areas of law. Across all Group Risk Categories we focus on remaining in compliance with all substantive laws.
Our risk appetite
We want to take advantage of commercial opportunities. So we take considered, evidenced, defensible decisions on complying with applicable laws. We assess risks to help us decide on proposed actions. That means looking at the nature of the risk, the cost of compliance, the value of the proposed actions and the steps we’d need to take to bring them within our risk appetite. In corporate governance, we determine the risks for a position we take based on things like our rules and policies, market practice, investor expectations and our stakeholders’ views.
Examples of dynamic risks
Examples of what we do to manage these risks
Scenarios considered in viability analysis
A breach of sanctions or export controls – leading to regulatory investigation, fines, debarring from public contracts and reputational damage. We fail to successfully defend the high value claims brought against the group.
Sponsor: CEO, Consumer
We’re exposed to more financial services regulation as we attract new consumer credit and insurance customers. We expect to continue scaling-up and broadening these products and services in the coming years. That means meeting all applicable Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) principles, rules and requirements. Operating outside FCA rules, requirements or permissions could harm customers and lead to fines, loss of FCA permissions, slow service take-up and broader reputational damage.
We aim to minimise regulatory risk in two ways. First, by building operational capabilities that help us develop our financial services activities compliantly. Second, by maintaining a trusted relationship with the FCA. We monitor a range of conduct risk metrics. We focus on meeting Consumer Duty outcomes including compliance monitoring, complaints data and customers in collections. These are early warning indicators of potential customer harm which we can act on.
Failing to get additional FCA permissions may result in adverse impact on product rollout and projected revenues.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 66
Strategic report
Our principal risks and uncertainties continued
Sponsor: Chief Security and Networks Officer
We want to deliver best-in-class performance across our fixed and mobile networks and IT. That means being operationally resilient and managing any risk that could disrupt our services. Service disruptions could be caused by things like bad weather, accidental or deliberate damage to our assets. Some service disruptions might depend on suppliers’ and partners’ reliability – making it important to pick the right ones.
We want customers to get market-leading services, underpinned by best-in-class network performance. To achieve that we must prioritise resources to give the best possible service and customer experience, while aligning with our strategy. We aim to deliver exceptional performance for Critical National Infrastructure, high volume (FTTC/4G) and strategic (FTTP/5G) products whilst maintaining acceptable performance for legacy services.
Crisis in the energy sector leading to winter power shortages.
Sponsor: Chief Security and Networks Officer
Our aim is to protect BT Group, colleagues and customers from harm and financial loss from cyber security events. We run critical national infrastructure. So a cyber attack – from an external or internal threat or a third party – could disrupt both customers and the country, and compromise data. A poorly managed cyber security event might cost us money, damage our reputation and impact our market share. The regulator might also impose fines or penalties.
Cyber risk is inherent to our business, and we could suffer significant reputational damage from a major cyber event. But we acknowledge that we can’t eradicate all cyber risks. Cyber security events could be deliberate or accidental, coming from inside or outside the group. So we adapt our security position and controls accordingly to detect and respond to evolving threats. We prioritise protecting our critical systems and networks, and the data and information they contain.
We fall victim to a widely publicised cyber attack. It leads to loss of customer data, compensation claims and enduring reputational damage.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 67
Strategic report
Sponsor: Chief Human Resources Officer
Our people strategy is to enable a culture where every colleague can be their best and help achieve our ambitions. This means we must manage risk around our organisational structure, skills and capabilities, engagement, culture, wellbeing and diversity.
Our highest priority is making sure colleagues can work and perform at their best. We’ll seek to avoid risks that could compromise key business priorities, and minimise any that can’t be avoided to as low as reasonably practicable. We avoid risks that could lead us to not complying with applicable employment legislation. A relatively small number of roles have a disproportionate effect on our success. For those, we have a much lower risk tolerance of not having the right capabilities. To deliver our transformation and achieve our ambitions, we’re prepared to take carefully managed short-term employee relations risks.
A widespread lack of availability of frontline colleagues affecting service delivery and leading to poor customer experience and reputational harm.# Health, safety and environment
Sponsor: Chief Security and Networks Officer
What this category covers
We have diverse working environments in various locations, some of which pose a health or safety risk. We’re committed to ensuring the health, safety and wellbeing of our colleagues, contractors, suppliers, customers, visitors and members of the public. We are committed to protecting the environment and building a sustainable future, with effective environment and energy management – and particular focus on reducing our carbon emissions.
Our risk appetite
Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) is a key priority for the business and is the foundation on which we operate. Our strategy is to maintain effective HSE risk management to make sure our employees (and others who are affected by our undertaking) and the environment are properly protected. We apply proactive risk management to identify, control and mitigate significant risks across the business to a level deemed as low as reasonably practicable. We consider legal, regulatory and other requirements as the minimum obligation. We want to go beyond that – aiming for zero avoidable harm and the prevention of pollution.
Examples of dynamic risks
* Point risks:
* Heightened risks from the additional civil and construction work to support the full fibre rollout including harm to colleagues, increased regulatory scrutiny, legal claims and reputational damage.
* Failing to ensure effective in-life contractor management, which may result in increased risks through sub-optimal working practices, and subsequent enforcement action, legal claims and reputational damage.
* Failing to effectively manage waste could lead to material financial loss and reputational damage.
Examples of what we do to manage these risks
* Our group policy is underpinned by our standards and key controls and the HSE framework is reflected in our code.
* We train colleagues and make sure they’re clear on their responsibilities and are competent to undertake their activities.
* We make sure that colleagues and their representatives participate in (and are consulted on) HSE matters.
* We adopt a leadership role with our contractors, helping them improve their own HSE performance.
* We allocate appropriate resources to develop, maintain and continually improve our HSE management system.
Scenario considered in viability analysis
A new pandemic as severe as Covid-19 causes harm to colleagues and disrupts service delivery and business operations.
Sponsor: CEO, Business a
What this category covers
We offer and deliver a diverse mix of major contracts which contribute to our business performance and growth. In a highly competitive and dynamic environment, we seek to win and retain major private and public sector contracts. We do that while navigating customer relationships and risk in complex agreements – delivering highly sensitive, critical or essential services globally. Customer contractual terms can be onerous and challenging to meet, which can lead to delays, penalties and disputes. Delivery or service failures against obligations and commitments could damage our brand and reputation, particularly for critical infrastructure contracts or security and data protection services. Not managing contract exits, migrations, renewals or disputes could erode profit margins and affect future customer relationships.
Our risk appetite
We want a diverse mix of major contracts to help our business grow. To do that, we must build our market share, target the right customers, make beneficial commercial and legal agreements and deliver services successfully. As markets change, we need to proactively adjust our portfolio of services, countries and customers to avoid concentration risk, stagnation and legacy dependency. We know this involves taking on higher risk – for example, complex customer agreements with obligations not fully covered by our standard portfolio, terms and conditions and/or delivery processes. We must manage this risk in the bid process and contract lifecycle to minimise the overall impact.
Examples of dynamic risks
* Point risks:
* Failing to deliver on bespoke customer data requirements could lead to potential breaches, fines and reputational harm.
* New IT infrastructure challenges, skills shortages, scale or complexity could stop us delivering our digital portfolio transformation.
* Emerging risks:
* The changing competitor landscape might affect market dynamics and competition.
Examples of what we do to manage these risks
* We have a clear governance framework to assess new business opportunities, manage bids and monitor in-life contract risks.
* As part of bids, we check non-standard unfavourable terms and conditions and mitigate them where we can.
* Our senior management, and a dedicated team, regularly review our contracts.
* We support frontline contract managers with contract and obligation management tools.
Scenario considered in viability analysis
A major incident causes reputational damage, leading to us losing major public services contracts.
Sponsor: CEO, Consumer a
What this category covers
We want to give customers standout service, build personal and enduring relationships, and take extra care of vulnerable customers and customers with differing needs. We aim to keep customer satisfaction high as we continue to migrate customers from legacy products and services to new ones. If we didn’t continually improve and personalise our customer experience, it could affect customer satisfaction and retention, our colleagues’ pride and advocacy, revenues and brand value. Accurate and competitive pricing is important. We must also manage product and service lifecycles, inventory and supply chain, and meet our customer obligations and product and service standards.
Our risk appetite
We want to be below the industry average for Ofcom complaints and keep improving our customer NPS. We aim to maintain customer satisfaction, launch new products and services that benefit them and minimise issues. We must serve customers through modern, cost-effective platforms and minimise the number of them on expensive, old and labour-intensive legacy products and services. We also want customers to feel we give them personalised service through frictionless channels.
Examples of dynamic risks
* Point risks:
* Failing to switch customers (including those who are vulnerable or have differing needs) from old to new service platforms could interrupt their service, cause customer churn and/or lead to regulatory intervention.
* Failing to make sure we have the right current and future skills to serve our customers could lead us to not meet customer expectations, lose customers or market share and harm our reputation.
* Emerging risk:
* Customer trust and confidence in future AI solutions.
Examples of what we do to manage these risks
* We keep our promises on the service levels customers should expect and we track a range of customer experience performance metrics while continuing to improve service.
* We have processes in place to identify and serve vulnerable and differing needs customers.
* We have clear and comprehensive brand guidelines.
* We work with suppliers to manage relationships and risks.
* We design new products and services (and pilot them where possible) to make sure they benefit customers.
* We have a colleague retention and skills development plan to make sure we’re not short on key skills.
Scenario considered in viability analysis
A defect in a customer’s device – leading to a full product recall and a significant service disruption.
a Excluding Openreach, which has separate GRC sponsorship and management.
Sponsor: Chief Financial Officer
What this category covers
We have a lot of suppliers. Successfully selecting, bringing on board and managing them is essential for us to deliver quality products and services. We must make decisions about suppliers on concentration, capability, resilience, security, costs and broader issues that could impact our business and reputation.
Our risk appetite
Our appetite guides buying decisions. That includes sole or dual sourcing for products or services that support key business aims or activities – or where alternative sources aren’t economically viable. To get the best commercial rates and operational resilience we continuously engage with and challenge key suppliers on pricing, without introducing service and/or delivery risks. Properly managing so many third parties needs effective governance. So we have a low appetite for dealing with suppliers outside of our defined policies or processes. We have to make sure third parties don’t expose our brands to damage. That means avoiding – or stopping working with – any that don’t meet our standards on key areas like human rights.
Examples of dynamic risks
* Point risks:
* Increased energy prices, supply shortages and inflation could affect cost-cutting targets and future investments.
* Geopolitical tensions (like the Russia-Ukraine war and escalations in the Middle East) could disrupt supply chain, raise costs and inflation, and increase cyber security threats.
* Emerging risks:
* A difficult economic environment could put pressure on smaller suppliers.
* Extreme climate conditions might disrupt supply chains.
Examples of what we do to manage these risks
* Our sourcing strategy uses different approaches to managing risk by category. That includes standard terms and conditions and controls so we can make purchasing decisions efficiently and effectively.
* We have comprehensive supplier due diligence, contract management, on-boarding processes and are reviewing and improving our in-life assessment process.
* We have robust supplier risk management, performance, renewal and termination processes.# Strategic report
– We do demand planning and forecasting, stock counts and inventory management so we have supplies available.
– We get assurance that the goods and services we buy are made, delivered and disposed of responsibly. That includes monitoring energy use, labour standards and environmental, social and governance impacts.
Scenario considered in viability analysis
Increasing geopolitical tensions lead to supply chain disruptions and cost inflation.
Transformation delivery
Sponsor: Chief Financial Officer
What this category covers
We’re accelerating transformation delivery to build a simpler, more efficient and dynamic BT Group. We’re modernising our IT, automating processes with AI, streamlining our product portfolio and migrating to next-generation strategic networks. All this will deliver significant cost efficiencies – while also improving our customers’ and colleagues’ digital experiences.
Failing to manage transformation execution risks could make us less efficient and damage our financial performance and customer experience.
Our risk appetite
We’ve defined the risk level we’re willing to tolerate for transforming our products, customer journeys and technology. We track specific metrics to check we’re achieving genuine, sustainable transformation outcomes and not just cutting costs. Delivering within our risk appetite will give us competitive advantage, enable faster delivery, improve customer experience and make sure our costs benchmark favourably with peers.
Examples of dynamic risks
Point risks:
– Failure to manage complex interdependencies to complete the migration of customers and close legacy IT and networks.
– The volume and complexity of our transformational activities across different parts of the group, combined with day-to-day business, could dilute our efforts and stop us reaching our sustainable transformation goals.
Emerging risk:
– Delays in switching customers onto new, strategic products could slow or stop us closing our copper network and exchanges.
Examples of what we do to manage these risks
– We review transformation performance at monthly Executive Committee meetings – managing dependencies, making informed decisions and removing blockers.
– We have strong governance, with senior leaders owning specific operational and financial outcomes. Each quarter we assess our performance – allocating funding to the programmes delivering the most strategic value.
– We invest in digital and data capabilities to cut costs, grow revenue and make sure we have the right resources to deliver sustainable change effectively.
– We invest in our people strategy to make sure we have the right skills and culture needed to deliver transformation.
Scenario considered in viability analysis
We are not able to execute the transformation plans we need to deliver savings initiatives.
We assess and report on how we manage the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the group. We detail here how we’re complying with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations – our ‘TCFD disclosure’.
– Under FCA Listing Rule LR 9.8.6(8) as a premium listed company we have to explain how we’re complying (or not) with the TCFD framework.
– We also have to comply with requirements of the Companies Act 2006, as amended by the Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 2022.
– We believe the following climate-related financial disclosures are consistent with the TCFD framework and therefore comply with Listing Rule 9.8.6(8) and Companies Act requirements – summarised in Table 1: TCFD Compliance Summary.
– Where relevant, we’ve accounted for TCFD guidance and the Financial Reporting Council’s recent recommendations on materiality around governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.
– We’ve integrated climate-related disclosures throughout this report. So in some areas we’ve cross-referenced to another section with the relevant information.
– The information in this TCFD section has been reviewed to a high level of assurance against AccountAbility’s AA1000AS v3 assurance standard.
In this year’s TCFD disclosure, we’ve:
– updated our scenario analysis by expanding our assessment of physical climate risks to our global sites and global suppliers and by calculating the financial opportunity from our carbon abatement solutions
– disclosed the metrics and targets we use to monitor performance on our climate risks and opportunities
– updated our disclosure of our remuneration policy which was updated in FY24, describing how we consider our climate performance in remuneration.
We have cut our operational carbon emissions intensity by 61% since FY17.
| TCFD Recommendation | Compliance Status | Section reference |
|---|---|---|
| Governance | ||
| 1 Board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities | Full | TCFD section: Our climate change governance – Board oversight on climate change (page 73) Corporate governance report: Our governance structure (page 85) and climate governance (page 105) |
| 2 Management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities | Full | TCFD section: Our climate change governance – Management’s roles and responsibilities (page 73) Corporate governance report: Our governance structure (page 85) and climate governance (page 105) |
| Strategy | ||
| 3 Climate-related risks and opportunities (short, medium, long term) | Full | TCFD section: Climate change strategy – Planning climate risks and opportunities across different time horizons, Analysing our strategy using climate scenarios (page 74 to 76) |
| 4 Impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the business, strategy, and financial planning | Full | TCFD section: Climate change strategy – Embedding climate change into our strategy (page 77 to 78) Strategic report: Our Manifesto - Sustainable (pages 37 to 39) |
| 5 Resilience of the organisation’s strategy, considering different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario | Full | TCFD section: Climate change strategy – Analysing our strategy using climate scenarios (pages 74 to 78) |
| Risk management | ||
| 6 Processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks | Full | TCFD section: How we manage climate risks (page 78) Strategic report: Risk management framework (pages 61 to 70) and climate-related GRCs (pages 63, 67 and 70) |
| 7 Processes for managing climate-related risks | Full | TCFD section: How we manage climate risks (page 78) Strategic report: Risk management framework (pages 61 to 70) and climate-related GRCs (pages 63, 67 and 70) |
| 8 Identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks, and integration into overall risk management | Full | TCFD section: How we manage climate risks (page 78) Strategic report: Risk management framework (pages 61 to 70) and climate-related GRCs (pages 63, 67 and 70) |
| Metrics and targets | ||
| 9 Metrics to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with strategy and risk management processes | Full | TCFD section: Our climate metrics and targets – Metrics and targets to measure and monitor risks and opportunities (page 79) |
| 10 Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 GHG emissions, and the related risks | Full | TCFD section: Our climate metrics and targets – Our worldwide energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (page 80) Strategic report: ESG Addendum at bt.com/esgaddendum |
| 11 Targets used to manage climate-related risks and opportunities, and performance against targets | Full | TCFD section: Our climate metrics and targets – Metrics and targets to measure and monitor risks and opportunities, Our worldwide energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (pages 79 to 80) Strategic report: Our Manifesto - Sustainable (pages 37 to 39) and ESG Addendum at bt.com/esgaddendum |
We set out here the internal governance bodies, processes and ways in which we identify and manage climate-related risks and opportunities.
Board oversight on climate change
The Board
The Board is responsible for how we identify and manage climate-related risks. Matters reserved to the Board include items of big strategic importance – things that directly impact the group’s funding position, reputation, integrity or ethical standards.
Responsible Business Committee
This Committee oversees our climate change strategy, programme and goals. It meets at least three times a year to monitor progress on our long-term responsible business goals – including climate change. It also assesses the sustainability underpin relative to our Restricted Share Plan, and makes recommendations to the Remuneration Committee. The Chair reports to the Board after each meeting. There’s more about the Responsible Business Committee on page 105.
Audit & Risk Committee
This Committee monitors and assesses our risk management and internal control systems’ effectiveness on the Board’s behalf. That includes climate change risks which span a number of different group risk categories (GRCs). You can read more about this Committee on pages 99 to 103 and more about our GRCs on pages 63 to 70.
Remuneration Committee
This Committee agrees the remuneration framework for the Chairman, Executive Directors, and members of the Executive Committee. It also monitors remuneration practices and policies for the wider workforce. In FY24 we updated our sustainability-linked remuneration. We have a sustainability underpin relative to our Restricted Share Plan for Executive Directors, which you can read more about on page 106.
Management’s roles and responsibilities
Chief Executive
The Chief Executive is responsible for our environmental policy and performance. That includes climate-related issues.# Strategic report
We think about climate risks and opportunities over the short, medium, and long term. Our timeframes consider our risk management framework, financial planning processes, external legal and regulatory changes, and the longer-term nature of physical climate changes.
This timeframe considers the chance of events exposing us to risk over the next three years, in line with our risk management framework. We factor in acute physical risks like flooding and higher temperatures into our annual plans. This helps us to adapt and reduce the impact on our business or value chain.
This timeframe aligns to our financial planning process, which uses a five-year horizon.
This timeframe matches our investment timeframes for strategic assets like networks that we plan over longer periods – sometimes up to 20 years. It also influences our strategy, targets, and plans for responding to climate change’s bigger risks and transitional implications. Our scenario analysis considers risks in 2050 and beyond, and our long-term climate targets extend to FY41.
We use scenario analysis to understand what risks and opportunities could affect us in the long term. This year we focused on advancing our financial impact modelling, and establishing metrics to monitor our progress in managing these risks and opportunities.
We try to identify and assess the risks and opportunities likely to have the most material financial impact on our business – like on revenues, current and future potential costs, including capital. We use different scenarios to assess our climate risks and opportunities from physical impacts and the move to a low-carbon economy. We’ve based our scenarios on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)a, Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) and International Energy Agency (IEA), among other sourcesb. The table below shows the different climate-related scenarios we’ve considered to help test our organisational strategy’s resilience. Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) are IPCC’s climate scenarios.
Table 2: BT Group’s Climate Scenarios
| Transition scenarios | Physical scenarios | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Temperature equivalent scenarios (°C warming by 2100 above preindustrial levels) | Description | Name |
| Current Policies (CP) | 3 | High emissions Emissions keep rising as no extra climate policies are implemented from today. | SSP5-8.5 |
| Delayed Transition (DT) | 1.6 | Low emissions Emissions keep rising until 2030. After 2030, climate policies are put in place and are scaled rapidly to hit net zero by 2050. | SSP2-4.5 |
| Net Zero (NZ) | 1.5 | Low emissions Climate policies are implemented from today and become more stringent over time, allowing society to hit net zero by 2050. | SSP1-2.6 |
a We derived projections from the World Climate Research Programme’s Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (version 5 and 6/ CMIP5 and 6) and the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment. Other data sets include high precision flood data and country-level climate data from the NGFS.
b We modelled transition risks and opportunities using data from NGFS phase 4. Carbon prices are derived from equivalent scenarios from the IEA, to represent an explicit carbon tax.
In line with TCFD guidance and requirementsa, we modelled the impact on our current strategy and business plan – using current decarbonisation plans and the commitments in our medium term plan. For some transition risks and opportunities, we present the financial impacts of different action we could take – to show worst and best case scenarios. For physical risks, we present the financial impacts for our UK and global sites, considering our most critical network building assets such as our telephone exchanges and data centres. This does not include mobile phone masts, telephone cabinets, or cable infrastructure.
This year, we assessed physical risks in our supply chain, looking at 28 critical suppliers. We assessed this with country-level climate data considering our suppliers’ main country of operation. We assessed the impact of more flooding, more intense, longer and more frequent heatwaves and extreme weather events. As we collect more accurate locations of our suppliers and logistics network, we plan to refine this analysis and expand to other climate hazards such as drought. We’ve presented the final outputs in annualised nominal terms. We haven’t applied social discount factors to avoid double counting with our financial models. We categorised the financial effects using our risk management framework, and treated each risk and opportunity as mutually exclusive events.
We think our strategy is resilient to climate risks and is well positioned to capture climate opportunities in the modelled scenarios. The tables below summarises our prioritised climate risks and opportunities for the different scenarios we considered. We’ve concluded that climate risks and opportunities don’t have a material effect on our FY24 financial statements disclosures. As we anticipate that the magnitude of climate risks and opportunities will change over time, we’ll closely monitor our risks and opportunities and expand the assessment as part of continually assessing climate risks.
In high emissions scenarios (CP and SSP5-8.5), physical risks have a greater impact than transition risks, as these are driven by more frequent and severe weather, particularly in the longer term. Our analysis looks at direct climate change impacts on the most material areas of our business. It doesn’t include secondary effects – like forced migration or geopolitical tensions – resulting from climate change. We recognise the very severe consequences this scenario could have globally. We’re working to play our part in decarbonising our own operations and value chain to help avoid it. At the same time, we’re making sure we prepare for increasingly severe and frequent climate-related hazards. We’re investing in flood defences, cooling upgrades and better analytics data to make sure that our network is resilient.
Conversely, we expect transition risks to have a greater impact under low emissions scenarios (DT and NZ). That’s because they’re driven by changes in policy and regulation as well as stakeholders’ behaviour (including customers). There are also opportunities linked to the low-carbon transition – like developing carbon abatement solutions to help customers cut emissions, and cutting energy costs through efficiency measures. DT scenario trends are similar to NZ – but with the impact on the business happening sooner under NZ. We’re acting to reduce risk across the various climate-related scenarios, with an emphasis on long-term resilience.
Table 3: Summary of our physical risks from climate change
| Prioritised risk or opportunity | Time horizonb | Description | Potential financial impacts | 2030 | 2040 | 2050 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More floodingc | Long | More frequent and severe flooding, increasing damage to BT Group infrastructure. | – Higher costs to repair damaged assets. – Lower revenue from network disruption. |
SSP5-8.5 | SSP2-4.5 | SSP1-2.6 |
| More intense, longer and more frequent heatwaves | Long | Higher temperatures and more frequent heatwaves, affecting BT Group operations and leading to increased energy consumption for cooling. | – Higher energy costs from extra cooling demands for equipment and operations during high temperature periods. – Lower productivity from labour hours lost through heat stress. |
SSP5-8.5 | SSP2-4.5 | SSP1-2.6 |
| More intense, longer and more frequent extreme weather events | Long | Storms and extreme wind damaging assets that then need repairing – affecting our service, increasing maintenance costs and reducing revenue. | – Higher costs to repair damaged assets. – Lower revenue from network disruption. |
SSP5-8.5 | SSP2-4.5 | SSP1-2.6 |
| Supply chain disruption from physical climate risks | Long | More extreme, frequent and severe flooding, heat and weather events disrupting our supply chain. | – Pass through costs from suppliers dealing with physical hazards. | SSP5-8.5 | SSP2-4.5 | SSP1-2.6 |
a TCFD: Implementing the Recommendations on the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
b The time horizon where impact is potentially the greatest.# Strategic report
Our exposure to physical risks changes over time. Rolling out full fibre and closing our legacy networks will mean fewer physical network sites. That will cut our exposure to physical climate change risks (but does mean more services going through fewer operational locations). On top of that, full fibre is more ‘passive’ (with no electronics between exchanges and connected properties) – further mitigating the risk of flooding, or extreme heat or weather damaging our equipment. Our insurance policies cover claims on asset loss and damage which also lessens any potential financial impact of climate and weather events.
In line with our future location strategy, last year we completed an analysis of possible flood risks from climate change across different climate change scenarios. This year we used that analysis to decide where to invest in measures to help us minimise – or respond faster to flooding. These include installing and upgrading sump pumps and bulkheads at our sites. We also updated the site analysis with the latest data to keep it accurate and up-to-date. We’re expanding our climate change flood risk assessments to help us make decisions on future strategic locations. This year we trialled using drones to survey potential risks around water getting into the fabric of our buildings.
In most scenarios from 2030-2050 the UK will see more extreme heat days. We have been undertaking a programme of cooling upgrades at our core network and mobile sites, which allow them to operate effectively in up to 45°C external temperatures. This year we’ve invested nearly £3m in these upgrades at our larger core metronode sites. We’ve also finished upgrades in our strategic data centres and upgraded cooling plants at our mobile core sites. In our local exchanges, we’re installing and upgrading cooling plants with adiabatic units, which use fresh air and water evaporation, making us less reliant on refrigerant gases. They work best on the hottest days – well suited to the rising ambient temperatures of different warming scenarios from 2030-2050. This year we’ve invested £5m on cooling system upgrades for local exchanges. To reduce energy costs from cooling, we’ve increased the base temperature in sites across our network while maintaining optimal temperatures for our equipment.
Our extreme weather processes minimise service disruption. We continually scan the weather horizon to get early warning of potential weather-related risks, allowing us to prepare and launch defences. In extreme weather, our processes help us manage risks and prioritise restoring services – so customer impacts are minimised. We had ten extreme weather events in the winter of 2023/24. Our preparation, management and strong infrastructure made sure they caused no major service disruptions. We track storm, temperature, rainfall and impact data. We use it alongside climate projections to calculate current and future risks.
This year we assessed physical climate risks in our supply chain. We have strong supply management risk processes in place. They include comprehensive supplier due diligence, engaging with and challenging key suppliers on pricing and supply chain diversity, and demand planning and forecasting.
Cutting emissions in our value chain and hitting our net zero targets should mitigate the impact of carbon pricing, cost of capital, energy pricing volatility and reputation risks. It will also support the UK’s commitment to becoming a net zero economy by 2050. Our carbon reduction plan explains what we’re doing to cut our operational and value chain emissions. See bt.com/carbonreductionplan for more information.
We track changing customer preferences. We reflect this in how we engage with them and how we talk about our climate progress in customer communications and bids. As well as opportunities around strategy and targets, our climate change actions help us stand out from the competition. We were one of the first companies to join initiatives like RE100, the CDP supply chain programme, and 1.5°C Supply Chain Leaders. Supportive policies are critical to both our group and wider society to keep within the 1.5°C warming limit. So we work with regulators and policymakers to advocate for regulation to create this policy environment. We also work with peers through associations like GSMA, techUK, Joint Audit Cooperation and the European Green Digital Coalition to build knowledge and expertise on ICT’s potential to help decarbonise other sectors. We work with policymakers too – to inspire others (like small and medium-sized enterprises) – to take climate action.
We’re not directly in the scope of a carbon pricing scheme. But we track developments and prices in the UK and other relevant jurisdictions.
The Board oversees our debt status. We also have formal treasury risk management processes, delegated approvals and lender relationship management to manage credit risk across the group – including climate-related risks. On the equity side, we engage regularly with shareholders through our investor relations team – including discussions on our ESG performance.
There are lots of ways for customers to cut their carbon emissions (and associated climate risks) through our products and services. Most of our solutions reduce the need to travel, lower energy use and cut material and manufacturing needs. Partnering with sustainability tech company QiO, we’ve launched an AI-powered edge computing solution to help our business customers cut carbon by optimising their energy use. We’ve also introduced real-time energy and carbon dashboards for bigger customers to help them estimate their networks’ carbon footprints and cut emissions. We’re collaborating with Johnson Controls to help customers digitalise their buildings and optimise their heating, ventilation and cooling systems to reduce energy and carbon.
Transforming our operating model includes making the group as energy efficient as possible. And we’ve already done a lot to cut our energy consumption. We’ve decommissioned redundant or underused network infrastructure and upgraded existing infrastructure to boost capacity with less energy. We’ve used machine learning to make incremental energy savings, and replaced supporting mechanical and electrical infrastructure (heating, cooling, and lighting) with more energy-efficient alternatives. We’re also moving to fewer, more efficient buildings. And longer- term, the switch to full fibre will need fewer exchanges and other network sites – cutting our network’s overall energy consumption. Climate change, and other macroeconomic factors like war in Ukraine, expose us to fluctuating energy prices that we must manage.
We produced high precision flood data for two epochs: 2030s (2021 to 2040) and 2050s (2041 to 2070) to capture the potential range of flood effects in the future. The results presented show the effects of flooding for an average year in each of these epochs. 2040 results are an average of 2030 and 2050 to aid comparison with the other risks and opportunities that we’ve explored.
| Transition risk / opportunity | Time horizon | Description | BT Group scenario | Potential financial impacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changing customer expectations and how they see us | Long | Risk: Customers have rising expectations on corporate climate action. If we lag behind peers on decarbonisation, we could lose customers. | Our emissions decline slowly, following a current policies scenario | Lower revenue from customer churn |
| Opportunity: By differentiating ourselves as a climate change leader and hitting our net zero targets, our revenues could go up. | We hit our net zero targets | Higher revenue from our improved reputation on climate change | ||
| Carbon pricing and taxation | Medium | Risk: Regulatory and governmental policy changes could introduce carbon pricing and taxation. Carbon pricing might hit some suppliers hard and early. Those suppliers might pass on extra costs to us. | Our emissions decline slowly, following a current policies scenario | Higher operating costs |
| We hit our net zero targets | ||||
| Cost of capital | Long | Risk / opportunity: Our debt interest rate might change – depending on our net zero progress. Long term interest rates could also change due to climate policy and investment. On the equity side, shareholders could choose to invest or withdraw funds depending on our net zero progress. | Our emissions decline slowly, following a current policies scenario | Higher or lower cost of capital |
| We hit our net zero targets | ||||
| Carbon abatement solutions | Short | Opportunity: There might be increased demand for our carbon abatement solutions, telematics and carbon dashboards. | We roll out our current plans to grow revenue for these products | Higher revenue from abatement products |
| Energy pricing and efficiency | Short | Opportunity: Improving our networks’ and sites’ energy efficiency could lower our operating costs (even with higher energy prices in the scenario). | We roll out our current energy efficiency plans | Lower operational costs |
Relative financial impact key
Risk
| Limited | Low | Moderate | High | Very high |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Opportunity
| Limited | Low | Moderate | High | Very high |
| Financial impact | < £5m | £5m-£50m | £50m-£250m | £250m-£1bn | >£1bn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 76# Strategic report
So our target is for UK (excluding Northern Ireland) energy demand to be at least 80% hedged a quarter before the start of the next financial year – and 50% hedged for the following financial year. In each financial year, we aim to build our Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) and virtual Power Purchase Agreement (vPPA) portfolio and explore five to ten year contract opportunities. We complement that by monitoring markets and forward purchasing electricity when the market is right.
The impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on our financial planning Our medium term plan considers both capital and operating expenditure over a rolling five-year timeframe. The plan includes our investments on renewable electricity, transforming our buildings estate, making our network more resilient, energy efficiency and switching to a low carbon fleet. This helps us mitigate the potential impact of the bigger risks affecting our business and support our Manifesto goals. We also include projected revenue from carbon abatement solutions in our medium term plan.
A structured and consistent approach to risk management We identify, assess, manage, and monitor climate-related risks through our risk management framework. We consider three types of risk:
We could face climate-related risks in all these risk types, which we track and report to the Audit & Risk Committee and Executive Committee. You can read more about all of our overall GRCs on pages 63 to 70.
We’ve identified climate-related risks in several GRCs. They include operational resilience (like more flooding, more intense, longer and more frequent heatwaves), stakeholder management (like changing consumer preferences, and how they see us), supply management (like supply chain disruption from physical climate risks) and health, safety & environment. We identify those risks through bottom-up and top-down discussions in our units – and across the whole group. This includes existing and emerging regulatory requirements relating to sustainability, such as upcoming reporting requirements from the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
We judge point risks based on their potential impact and how likely they are to happen in the next three years. We judge emerging risks based on their potential impact, the timeframe over which a risk could manifest (which could be beyond the three-year horizon of point risks) and our level of preparedness. We calculate the impact for both risk types with quantitative and qualitative measures around financial impact, customer experience and stakeholder perception. This helps us decide the relative weight we give each risk.
Once we’ve identified and assessed risks we give them an owner, depending on their priority. These owners decide the things we need to do to respond – like assigning controls, contingencies and monitoring activities. Owners also regularly improve their action plans by checking metrics and other monitoring activities. This helps them understand future changes that might be needed – like taking new actions, escalating issues or updating assessment processes.
For emerging climate risks that are more uncertain and apply across several parts of the business, we have an established climate change emerging risk hub. It brings together people from across the group in a forum to discuss developments and agree actions.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 78
In line with our risk management processes and strategic objectives, we track a number of metrics to measure and manage our climate-related risks and opportunities set out in Table 5 below. We will continue to review our metrics and targets in line with potential regulatory changes and guidance from the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB).
We have a sustainability underpin for awards made under our Restricted Share Plan for Executive Directors. This means that we must have made sufficient progress towards our sustainability commitments for awards to be made. This could include progress on carbon emissions, carbon avoidance and circularity goals. You can read more about the sustainability underpin on page 109.
Table 5: Climate-related risk and opportunity metrics, targets, and performance
| Risk/ Opportunity name | Metric | Target | FY24 performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| More flooding | Network disruption (weighted for weather events) (%) | Network downtime limited to 0.01% | < 0.01% |
| More intense, longer and more frequent heatwaves | More intense, longer and more frequent extreme weather events | ||
| Supply chain disruption from physical climate risks | We assessed physical climate risks to our supply chain for the first time in depth this year. We’ll keep refining the assessment and develop metrics we could use to monitor this risk over time. | ||
| Changing customer expectations and how they see us | Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions (tCO2e) | By FY31, to be a net zero carbon emissions business (Scopes 1 and 2 market-based) By FY31, to reduce our supply chain carbon emissions by 42%, compared to FY17 levels (Scope 3 categories 1 - 8) By FY41, to be net zero for our supply chain and customer carbon emissions (Scope 3) |
164,743 (-59% vs FY17) 2,425,820 (-25% vs FY17) 3,000,873 (-26% vs FY17) |
| Carbon pricing and taxation Cost of capital |
ESG index performance: CDP, EcoVadis, MSCI, Sustainalytics, Vigeo Eiris | Maintain our top quartile (Q1) place | Q1 |
| Carbon abatement solutions | Cumulative emissions avoided by customers (tCO2e) | By FY30 help customers avoid 60m tonnes of CO2e by using our products and services | 1.5m (3.8m since FY21) |
| Energy pricing and energy efficiency | Networks’ energy consumption (GWh) | Reduce our net networks’ energy consumption annually | 1,680 (-5.1% vs FY23) |
| % hedged energy costs | Have energy demand at least 80% hedged one quarter before the start of the next financial year, and 50% hedged for the following financial year | 85% hedged one quarter before FY25 55% hedged for FY26 |
|
| % UK electricity consumption covered by PPAs | N/A | 24% |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 79
a This metric describes overall service disruption to our UK network, weighted for our technology platforms most impacted by weather.
b Refers to our UK on site electricity consumption, which excludes consumption from MBNL and tenants.
In the table below, we provide an overview of Scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse gas emissions and our performance against our emissions reduction targets. We report in line with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (ghgprotocol.org).
| FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Non-UK | UK | Non-UK | UK | Non-UK | |
| Energy GWh | CO2e Tonnes | Energy GWh | CO2e Tonnes | Energy GWh | CO2e Tonnes | |
| Scope 1 b (direct emissions) | ||||||
| Gas and oil – heating | 170 | 31,595 | 2 | 301 | 141 | 26,259 |
| Gas and oil – generators e | 30 | 6,842 | – | 30 | 32 | 7,264 |
| Fugitive emissions – refrigerants | 3,087 | 1,501 | 522 | |||
| Commercial fleet (converted from litres fuel) | 557 | 130,971 | 3 | 575 | 588 | 141,884 |
| Commercial travel (converted from mileage/cost/litres fuel) | 13 | 3,151 | 5 | 1,300 | 15 | 4,018 |
| Total Scope 1 | 770 | 175,646 | 10 | 3,707 | 776 | 179,947 |
| Scope 2 c (electricity including nuclear & CHP g ) | ||||||
| Total consumption (LBM h ) | 2,311 | 490,712 | 208 | 63,599 | 2,283 | 441,713 |
| MBM i renewable consumption | ||||||
| CO2e adjustments | ||||||
| General consumption | 2,309 | (490,371) | 208 | (63,397) | 2,280 | (440,976) |
| Commercial fleet EV j consumption | 2 | (298) | – | – | 3 | (634) |
| Company car EV consumption | – | (43) | – | – | 0.4 | (103) |
| Total Scope 2 CO2e MBM adjusted | – | 202 | – | 58 | – | 5 |
| Scopes 1 & 2 (MBM) | 3,081 | 175,646 | 218 | 3,909 | 3,059 | 179,947 |
| Worldwide Scopes 1 & 2 CO2e (MBM) | 179,555 | 183,943 | 164,743 | |||
| % change from baseline year FY17 (baseline 404,780) | (56)% | (55)% | (59)% | |||
| Scope 3 d : Worldwide emissions CO2e tonnes | 3,243,361 | 3,133,579 | 3,000,873 | |||
| Key climate targets: | ||||||
| Intensity metric | Scope 1 & 2 worldwide emissions tonnes CO2e per £m value added (baseline 31.50) | 14.19 | 14.04 | 12.44 | ||
| Target 31 March 2031 | % change from baseline year FY17 | (55)% | (55)% | (61)% | ||
| SBTI supply chain emissions GHG Scope 3 Upstream + Operational (GHG Catg 1-8) kt (baseline 3,217 kt) | 2,634 | 2,500 | 2,425 | |||
| Target 31 March 2031 | % change from baseline year FY17 | (18)% | (22)% | (25)% |
N/A: Not available or not applicable
a Data presented has been reviewed to a high level of assurance by LRQA Group Limited against Accountability’s AA1000AS v3 assurance standard. We restate historical years’ data to replace estimates with actual figures and/or when we think subsequent information is materially significant as determined during audit (typically variances greater than one percentage point at category level).
b Scope 1: direct emissions from our own operations (e.g. fleet/heating fuel combustion).
c Scope 2: indirect emissions from the generation of our consumed energy (mainly electricity) (excludes third-party consumption).
d Scope 3: including supply chain, customer use of our products and other indirect emissions (like employee commuting).
e For gas and oil based on GWh equivalent input value before combustion and gross calorific value.
f CO2e: carbon dioxide equivalent emissions.
g CHP: combined heat and power.
h LBM: location-based method for Scope 2 emissions accounting – as defined in the Scope 2 Guidance amendment to the Corporate Standard (ghgprotocol.org).
i MBM: market-based method for Scope 2 emissions accounting.
j EV: electric vehicle.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 80
In accordance with provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018, the Directors have assessed the prospects and viability of the group. The assessment has been based on the Company’s strategy, balance sheet and financing position, including our £2.1bn undrawn committed borrowing facility which matures in March 2027, and the potential impact of ‘Our principal risks and uncertainties’ (pages 63 to 70).
The Board has chosen to conduct its review for a period of five years to 31 March 2029. The Board believe that this is an appropriate timeframe as it aligns with the primary focus of our business and financial planning.
The assessment of viability is based on our medium term plan which forecasts the group’s profitability, cash flows and funding requirements, and is approved by the Board at the end of each year. The medium term plan is built from bottom-up business plans and financial forecasts of each of our Customer Facing Units (CFUs) and our Corporate Units (CUs) based on some central macroeconomic assumptions such as inflation and exchange rates. This is then supplemented by items managed at a group level. The macroeconomic assumptions are informed by independent third party forecasts. The performance of the group, our CFUs and our CUs against these forecasts is monitored monthly and this is supplemented each quarter through a series of quarterly business reviews of each unit conducted by the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer.
Beyond our medium term planning horizon, the group also makes investments that have business cases covering a longer time period, such as our network investments. Significant capital expenditure investment cases are approved by the Chief Executive and, where appropriate, the Board, after taking into account longer-term risks and opportunities such as the economy, technology and regulation.
Our medium term plan has been stress tested in a series of individual severe but plausible downside scenarios, each aligned to our group risk categories as set out on pages 63 to 70. This was followed by stress testing our forecasts against a combined scenario of correlated risks using a stochastic model. Finally, we then identified several mitigations that could realistically be taken by the business to avoid or reduce the impact of the underlying risk.
Our hypothetical combined downside scenario is based on hostilities in the Middle East escalating into a wider conflict. US and other Western allies’ involvement in the conflict increases and geopolitical relations between the West and Russia and China worsen. China increases military activities and blockades trading routes with Taiwan at the start of the five-year viability period. The combined effects on energy security and supply chain disruption lead to higher inflation, slower growth and recession which intensify cost-of-living pressures as well as increasing cyber and sanctions compliance risks. Increasing fixed infrastructure wholesale competition from alternative FTTP network providers materially impacts market share. Meanwhile, a hyperscaler makes direct moves into our markets. These impacts lead to additional pension payments being required. We fail to defend successfully the high value litigation claims brought against the group.
The individual scenarios selected for inclusion in the combined scenario were chosen based on some partial correlations and the current headwinds facing the group and the industry.
| Scenario | Risk Category | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|
| Winter power shortages | Operational resilience | A crisis in the energy sector leads to insufficient gas supply and energy volatility |
| Assumptions: – 35% of Britain to experience daily outages for up to 60 days – Telecommunications companies not prioritised for service | Supply chain disruption | Supply chains are disrupted due to blockage of trading routes |
| Assumptions: – Chinese blockades of trading routes with Taiwan slows but does not stop supply chain – Hostilities in Middle East have limited impact outside of global shipping impacts | International trade sanctions and export controls | Discovery of breaches of sanctions or export controls imposed by UK, US or EU nations |
| Assumptions: – Trigger for the scenario occurs in the first year – Widespread problem in two or more units leading to unintentional but significant breaches | Recession | The UK market experiences a significant recession with negative GDP growth. This increases unemployment rates and reduces household spend |
| Assumptions: – Loss of proportion of managed contract new business which is not recovered over the medium term plan period – Reduction of Consumer mobile device base | Cyber security breach with customer data loss | BT falls victim to cyber attacks, experiencing a major loss of customer data which leads to a successful class action against BT |
| Assumptions: – GDPR breach detected and announced followed by increased customer churn and EBITDA decline – Fine from the Information Commissioner’s Office – Class action claim from customers against the group | Competitive pressures from alternative FTTP network providers continue to intensify | Increased fixed infrastructure wholesale competition from alternative FTTP network providers |
| Assumptions: – Alternative FTTP network providers make significant gains in market share even when overbuilt by Openreach at a later date – Loss of volumes and materially lower retail market share | A hyperscaler makes direct move into our markets | Hyperscaler competitor directly enters consumer market |
| Assumptions: – Official announcement in late FY25 producing immediate impact from FY26 onwards – Consumer losses enable some savings over time – All existing operators experience same level of churn | Pensions deficit | An increase to BT’s funding obligations to the BT Pension Scheme (BTPS) |
| Assumptions: – A decline in macroeconomic outlook and financial markets increases the BTPS deficit – The deficit is met through higher deficit payments over the term of the existing recovery plan | Litigation losses | We fail to successfully defend the high value claims brought against the group |
| Assumptions: – Based on publicised claim values claimed with severe outcomes |
We have considered directly relevant mitigations that we would employ if these events occurred and included those impacts in our calculations. As a summation of the full impact of each of the individual scenarios in this stress test would be an extremely unlikely outcome we used a stochastic model to develop a more realistic severe but plausible combined scenario. We applied an 80th percentile confidence interval which allows for a stress test of the medium term plan with a plausible but still severe combination of events, without assuming the worst impact happens across all scenarios at the same time. The output of the 80th percentile confidence interval is around 40% of the total sum of these individual risks.
Applying our severe but plausible combined scenario with related mitigations indicates that BT would experience a liquidity shortage commencing in the second year. However, there are further mitigations, including planned debt issuance, that could be applied to eliminate this liquidity shortage. We would need to adopt around a third of the mitigations we have identified to maintain positive cash flow over the full five-year period of the assessment.
The mitigations directly in our control primarily revolve around reducing operating and capital expenditure cash outflow from the group. In addition, there are also several mitigations which are outside of our control like raising debt. The Board believe that it is reasonable to expect that it could continue to access debt capital markets to refinance a portion of our outstanding debt as it falls due, or to renew our undrawn committed facility (which expires in March 2027, before the end of the viability period). If access to debt markets wasn’t available, then equity capital markets would be considered as an alternative to raise funds.
Based on the results of this analysis, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the five-year period of their assessment. The directors also considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting when preparing the financial statements, as set out in the ‘Report of directors’ on page 126.
We’re committed to delivering on our bold ambition to be the world’s most trusted connector of people, devices and machines. We’re focused on growing sustainable value for all our stakeholders and the communities we operate in, through effective Board leadership, strong corporate governance and a clear understanding of the broader telecommunications market.
In respect of the year ended 31 March 2024, BT Group plc was subject to the Code published by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) in July 2018 (available at frc.org.uk).# Corporate governance report
The Board confirms that BT Group has applied all the principles and complied with or explained all the provisions of the Code throughout the year as seen below. BT Group is aware of the updated Code, published by the FRC in January 2024, which will apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2025.
Board leadership and company purpose
Division of responsibilities
Composition, succession and evaluation
Audit, risk and internal control
Remuneration
Contents
* Chairman’s governance letter 84
* Our governance framework 85
* Board leadership and company purpose – Board of directors and division of responsibilities 86
* – Role of the Board 88
* – Board focus in FY24 89
* – Board engagement with colleagues 90
* Section 172 statement 92
* Board composition, succession and evaluation – FY24 Board and Committee evaluation 94
* – Board induction 95
* – Nominations Committee Chair’s report 96
* Audit, risk and internal control – Audit & Risk Committee Chair’s report 99
* BT Compliance Committee Chair’s report 104
* Responsible Business Committee Chair’s report 105
* Report on directors’ remuneration – Remuneration Committee Chair’s letter 106
* – Focus on remuneration 110
* – Annual remuneration report 113
* – Remuneration in context 122
* Statement of directors’ responsibilities 125
* Report of the directors 126
*Further details on the responsibilities of the Board can be found on our website bt.com/governance
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 83
The Board remains focused on ensuring it governs the group effectively, making careful decisions to generate long-term value for our stakeholders. We are cognisant of the new Code and are well placed to ensure our governance practices across the group are strengthened in line with this and evolving best practice.
The Board prioritises effective corporate governance across the group. Promoting fairness, openness and transparency in its responsibilities to stakeholders and generating long-term, sustainable success has been, and will remain, the Board’s primary objective. The Board has been educated on the key changes coming out of the new Code, published in January 2024. We’re well placed to build on our corporate governance practices to comply with the Code in future years, and to ensure the Board is carrying out its role in governing the group effectively. In next year’s report we’ll provide an update on how the priorities of the Board and committees have been shaped by the new Code in FY25.
This Corporate governance report sets out the approach our Board takes to facilitate effective governance and how it supports our strategy and the decisions we have made, ensuring it considers the interests of our stakeholders and our contribution to society.
With these Board changes, we have focused on complementing the existing skills on the Board, and ensuring the best mix of diversity of viewpoints, skills and experience. More details on succession planning and the work of the Nominations Committee during the year can be found on pages 96 to 98.
During the year, the Board has also made some changes to simplify our Board and Committee structure. After careful consideration, it was decided that it was the appropriate time to disband the BT Compliance Committee and to transition its responsibilities across the Audit & Risk and Responsible Business Committees. More detail on this can be found on pages 99 and 105.
This has continued to be a challenging year for our colleagues; the Board recognised this and held many colleague-focused discussions during the year. After much deliberation, the Board decided to make changes to our colleague engagement mechanism and establish a comprehensive colleague outreach programme led by the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement. As part of this change, the Colleague Board was disbanded during the year. Maggie Chan Jones was appointed as our new Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, succeeding Isabel, who will step down from the Board at the conclusion of the 2024 AGM. Maggie’s previous experience, focus on coaching, and her championship of diversity, inclusivity and other colleague matters will help ensure that the voices of our colleagues continue to be heard in the boardroom. I’d like to thank Isabel for all of her support and guidance to the Colleague Board and our colleagues, over the past four years. Further detail on how the Board made this decision and how it engages with our colleagues can be found on pages 90 to 91.
We are committed to encouraging inclusive thinking inside and outside of our business. This year, we have made progress in ethnic minority representation, with decent gains against the bold targets set out in our Manifesto. For more information on our continued progress in this area, see pages 31 to 32 and 34 to 39.
The Board’s diversity targets are set out in our Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy. As at 31 March 2024, our Board comprised 50% female directors, two directors from an ethnic minority background, and one who has a disability. Ruth Cairnie’s appointment during the year as the Senior Independent Director ensured that we met the requirements of the Listing Rules to have female representation in at least one of the four senior board positions. This position was reinforced by Allison’s appointment as Chief Executive from 1 February 2024, meaning that half of the four senior board positions are now held by women. From the 2024 AGM, our Board will comprise 40% female directors, three directors from an ethnic minority background, and one who has a disability.
Leading this Board and our business continues to be a privilege. I would like to thank all our BT Group teams for their continued efforts to help us deliver on our purpose and I am excited to work with a fantastic group of fellow directors over the next year.
Adam Crozier
Chairman
15 May 2024
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 84
Responsible for the stewardship of the group, overseeing its conduct and affairs to deliver on our strategic objectives and creating long-term success to generate sustainable value for our shareholders and the interests of other stakeholders. The Board has established certain Committees to assist it in discharging its responsibilities and delegates day-to-day responsibilities to the Chief Executive.
Nominations Committee
Considers the structure, size and composition of the Board and its Committees and advises on succession planning for the Board and the Executive Committee. It ensures the Board is diverse, with the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge.
Remuneration Committee
Agrees the remuneration framework for the Chairman, Executive Directors and certain senior executives and monitors remuneration practices and policies for the wider workforce.
Responsible Business Committee
Agrees the responsible business strategy, including its implementation through our Manifesto goals and targets, and monitors adherence to consumer fairness principles.
On 6 April 2023, the Committee’s name changed from the Digital Impact & Sustainability Committee to the Responsible Business Committee.
National Security and Investigatory Powers Committee
Oversees our role in the use of official investigatory powers.
Chief Executive
Responsible for running the business and setting and executing the group strategy.
BT Investment Sub-Committee
Provides input and recommendations that support the Chief Executive’s decision making on investment cases and budgets.
Executive Committee
Assists the Chief Executive to develop and execute the group strategy and budget, and monitors overall performance and how we’re managing risks.
Disclosure Sub-Committee
Ensures BT Group meets its disclosure obligations and reviews and approves regulatory and other announcements before publication.
Matters reserved to the Board and its Committees’ terms of reference can be found on our website at bt.com/governance
Each Committee Chair formally reports to the Board following their meetings and makes any recommendation to the Board in line with that Committee’s terms of reference. Papers and minutes are circulated to all Board and Committee members as appropriate, other than to those with a potential conflict of interest. Deutsche Telekom’s nominated director owes a fiduciary duty to both BT Group and Deutsche Telekom. The Conflicted Matters Committee reviews all papers ahead of sharing these with him to identify potential or actual conflicts of interest.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 85
Adam Crozier
Chairman
Allison Kirkby
Chief Executive
Simon Lowth
Chief Financial Officer
Isabel Hudson
Independent Non-Executive Director
Matthew Key
Independent Non-Executive Director
Raphael Kübler
Non-Independent, Non-Executive Director
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 86
Membership key
* Audit & Risk Committee
* Committee Chair
* Executive Committee
* National Security and Investigatory Powers Committee
* Nominations Committee
* Remuneration Committee
* Responsible Business Committee
Ruth Cairnie
Senior Independent Non-Executive Director
Maggie Chan Jones
Independent Non-Executive Director and Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement
The Board is responsible for the overall strategic direction of the Group and for ensuring that it is well-managed. The directors listed below have been appointed to the Board in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association and relevant legislation. All directors are subject to re-election by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.
Adam Crozier
Chairman
Appointed to the Board May 2017. Adam is a highly experienced leader with a career spanning across public and private sectors, including chief executive roles at The Football Association and Royal Mail. He has also held a number of non-executive positions.
Allison Kirkby
President and Chief Executive Officer
Appointed to the Board July 2017. Allison is our President and Chief Executive Officer and is responsible for the overall leadership and management of the Group. She has extensive experience in senior executive roles across a number of industries, including telecommunications, media and consumer goods.
Philip Jansen
President and Chief Executive Officer
Appointed to the Board January 2019. Philip is our President and Chief Executive Officer and is responsible for the overall leadership and management of the Group. He has extensive experience in senior executive roles across a number of industries, including telecommunications, technology and financial services.
Simon Lowth
Senior Independent Director
Appointed to the Board September 2019. Simon has a deep understanding of financial services and has held a number of senior executive and non-executive roles, including Chief Financial Officer of Quintain Plc and a non-executive director of various listed companies.
Adel Al-Saleh
Independent Non-Executive Director
Appointed to the Board November 2022. Adel has a strong track record in the technology sector, with over 30 years of experience in leadership roles at global technology companies. He is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Temenos AG.
Ruth Cairnie
Independent Non-Executive Director
Appointed to the Board March 2022. Ruth has extensive experience in human resources and organisational development, gained through senior leadership roles at Shell plc. She is also a non-executive director of Segro Plc.
Maggie Chan Jones
Independent Non-Executive Director
Appointed to the Board October 2022. This builds on a highly successful career in marketing at several of the world’s largest technology companies, including Microsoft and SAP. Relevant skills and contribution to the Board: Deep international marketing and brand experience. Maggie is a recognised executive in business transformation, ESG and as an industry thought-leader in the marketing and technology sector. External appointments: Non-Executive Director of Sage Group and the United States Tennis Association (non-profit). She is also a Non-Executive advisor to Ontinue AG.
Steven Guggenheimer
Independent Non-Executive Director
Appointed to the Board October 2022. Experience: Steven has more than 25 years of experience at Microsoft, where he held a variety of senior and large-scale leadership roles between 1993 and 2020. For the last 12 years he held the position of Corporate Vice President leading the OEM, Developer/ISV, and AI Solutions organisations. Prior to joining Microsoft, Steven worked at Spectra-Physics Lasers. Relevant skills and contribution to the Board: Accomplished technology executive with a strong track record of advising businesses on digital transformation and extensive insight into technologies ranging from AI to cloud computing. External appointments: Non-Executive Director of HSBC Holdings, Forrit and Leupold & Stevens. He is also an advisor to Tensility Venture Partners and Aries Software Holdings.
Sara Weller
Independent Non-Executive Director
Appointed to the Board July 2020. Experience: Sara’s previous roles include Managing Director of Argos and various senior positions at J Sainsbury, including Deputy Managing Director and serving on its board between 2002 and 2004. Sara was a Non-Executive Director of Lloyds Banking Group until May 2021 and United Utilities Group until July 2020. She was also the lead Non-Executive Director at the Department for Work and Pensions until April 2020, Lead Non Executive at the Department of Communities and Local Government 2010 to 2015, Non-Executive Director of Mitchells & Butlers and held senior management roles at Abbey National and Mars Confectionery. Relevant skills and contribution to the Board: A broad perspective coming from a background in retail, fast moving consumer goods and financial services, as well as strong executive and non- executive board experience in regulated sector plcs and central Government organisations. External appointments: Chair of The Money and Pensions Service and Non-Executive Director of Virgin Money UK and Clydesdale Bank (a subsidiary of the Virgin Money Group).
Tushar Morzaria
Independent Non-Executive Director
Appointed to the Board May 2024. Tushar joined the Board on 7 May 2024 as an Independent Non-Executive Director. Tushar is a member of the Audit & Risk, Nominations and Remuneration Committees.
Sabine Chalmers
General Counsel, Company Secretary & Director Regulatory Affairs
Sabine joined BT Group in April 2018 as General Counsel and was appointed as Company Secretary in September 2021. See page 9 for Sabine’s full biography.
In line with our recent announcement, Isabel Hudson will not put herself forward for re-election at the 2024 AGM and will cease as an Independent Non-Executive Director on the Board at the conclusion of the 2024 AGM.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
87
Corporate governance report
Our directors share collective responsibility for the activities of the Board. There is a clear division of responsibilities between the Chairman and the Chief Executive as required under the Code. The responsibilities of the Chairman, Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Independent Director and other key roles within BT Group, along with the matters reserved to the Board, are set out on our website at bt.com/governance
The Board is responsible for establishing the group’s purpose, values, strategy and culture, and for setting the tone from the top. Further details on our purpose, ambition, values and strategy on pages 18 to 29.
The Board monitors the indicators of our culture through:
* discussions with the Chief Executive
* reports from the Chief Human Resources Officer, which include progress on simplifying organisational effectiveness and embedding a performance culture that rewards outcomes
* reports to the Audit & Risk Committee on any concerns raised through our Speak Up whistleblowing service, see page 102
* themes and insights from our Your Say colleague engagement surveys
* all-employee “Join Allison” live Q&A sessions
* direct feedback and insights from colleagues via our Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement.
We believe that these indicators remain effective in providing the Board with useful insights into colleague sentiment and the wider culture across the organisation. More information on how the Board is kept informed of colleague perspectives and our culture can be found on page 90 to 91 and in the Strategic report on page 41.
The Board maintains oversight of the group’s operations, performance, governance and compliance with statutory and regulatory obligations. It determines the group’s risk appetite, ensures that we have robust systems of risk management and internal controls in place, and is responsible for ensuring that there is an effective leadership team in place to efficiently execute the group’s strategy.
A number of key decisions and matters are reserved to the Board and are not delegated to any of the Committees, the Chief Executive or management. These are set out in the matters reserved to the Board and are available on our website: bt.com/governance
Board meetings in FY24 were held in person in our head office in London to ensure constructive levels of engagement and discussion, to challenge management and encourage robust debate as part of decision making. Video conference was available for invited attendees who were unable to join the Board in person. Pre-Board meeting dinners were held for the Board as part of informal interactions.
| Name | Meetings Attended |
|---|---|
| Adam Crozier | 8/8 |
| Allison Kirkby | 8/8 |
| Philip Jansen | 7/8 |
| Simon Lowth | 8/8 |
| Adel Al-Saleh | 7/7 |
| Ruth Cairnie | 8/8 |
| Maggie Chan Jones | 8/8 |
| Ian Cheshire | 2/2 |
| Iain Conn | 2/2 |
| Steven Guggenheimer | 7/8 |
| Isabel Hudson | 7/8 |
| Matthew Key | 8/8 |
| Raphael Kübler | 1/1 |
| Sara Weller | 8/8 |
We held eight scheduled Board meetings including one strategy meeting in FY24. The Chairman also held private sessions with the Non-Executive Directors during the year. The Company Secretary is Secretary to the Board, and she, or her delegate, attends all meetings and provides advice, guidance and support as required. Each member of the Board, individually and collectively, has access to the Company Secretary and can obtain independent professional advice if needed. Board and Committee members are provided with papers in advance of each meeting on a secure electronic portal. Directors are expected to attend Board and relevant Committee meetings of which they are a member, unless prevented by prior commitments, illness or a conflict of interest. If a director is unable to attend a meeting, they usually give their comments to the Chairman or the Committee Chair in advance so that these can be considered as part of the discussion at the meeting.
Our Section 172 statement is set out on pages 92 to 93 and demonstrates our Directors’ regard to the matters in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (2006 Act) in performing their duties, and how they have had regard to colleagues’ interests and the need to foster business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, together with a summary including the Board’s principal decisions. See pages 90 to 91 for details on the Board’s engagement with our colleagues and the Strategic report on pages 40 to 45 for additional details of how we engage with our key stakeholders.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
88
Corporate governance report
During the year, the Board:
Approved strategic initiatives and items of significant strategic importance in line with the matters reserved to the Board including:
* – maintaining the pace of FTTP build towards the target of 25m premises by the end of 2026 against the challenging economic climate
* – the sale of BT Tower to MCR London Holdings Limited for £275m (see pages 93 and 174)
* – BT Pension Scheme (BTPS) triennial valuation (see pages 54, 93 and 193)
* – simplification activities in relation to the merging of Enterprise and Global to create Business.
Held a full-day strategy meeting where it considered with management:
* – the group’s strategy and long-term growth opportunities
* – the approach for Business going forward
* – strategic priorities and how these are built into the group’s medium-term plan
* – progress on key initiatives
* – key challenges and risks to delivering our priorities and plans to address or mitigate these
* – the macroeconomic environment and how the group should respond.# Corporate governance report
Received and discussed the Chief Executive’s report at each meeting, which focused on:
* the group’s overall performance and operations
* progress against our strategic pillars and priorities
* the competitive and regulatory environment that the group operates in
* engagement with, and the views of, our stakeholders including our investors, our colleagues, Ofcom and Government
* key business operations including matters which are important to the group’s reputation, as well as colleague, customer, supplier and community considerations.
During the year, the Board also considered, discussed and agreed not to proceed with certain proposed initiatives which were determined not to be strategically important or beneficial to the group.
During the year, the Board discussed, reviewed and, as appropriate, approved:
* the financial statements at full and half year and trading updates at each quarter, including any external guidance. It also discussed the feedback from investor meetings, including feedback received after the publication of each set of financial results. At each meeting, the Board reviewed the current financial and trading performance for the period against budget and consensus, and the full year outlook for each unit and the group as a whole
* the going concern and viability statements and the group’s tax strategy
* reports, on a monthly basis, outlining share register movement, our share price performance relative to the market, investor relations activities and engagement with shareholders
* the medium-term plan, having considered the main opportunities and challenges, our strategic priorities and KPIs
* the group’s financing strategy, having considered different options for raising finance and managing cash flow
* the delivery of the group’s transformation programmes against our objectives to drive efficiencies, opportunities and continued cost reduction across the group
* customer experience for each CFU including individual brand and customer segment NPS, in particular the progress against our related ambitions. As part of this, the Board was updated on the initiatives and customer insights used to drive improvement for our customers. Further details on customer experience can be found on page 26 to 27.
* any regulatory or competition investigations and significant litigation, including our response and the stakeholder and reputational impact of these.
During the year, the Board discussed:
* the group risk management framework twice, with in-depth discussions on certain group risk categories (GRCs), including the point and emerging risks and uncertainties facing the group and our risk appetite for each (see pages 61 to 70). The Board also received regular updates from the Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee, which undertakes detailed reviews of the group’s systems of risk management and internal controls, including the effectiveness of the controls, mitigation activities and any areas for improvement (see page 102), as well as GRCs not discussed by the Board
* the progress of BT Group transformation programmes
* the Annual Report, which was subsequently approved on the recommendation of the Audit & Risk Committee (see page 100), that, taken as a whole, it is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to accurately assess the group’s position and performance, business model and strategy
* the themes and actions agreed as a result of this year’s Board and Committee evaluation (see page 94).
During the year, the Board discussed:
* the succession and appointment of the Chief Executive, delegating final approval to a sub-committee of the Board. More information on Allison’s appointment as Chief Executive can be found in the Nominations Committee Chair’s Report on page 96
* the progress of integrating Enterprise and Global into Business, together with the related operating model changes and colleague impacts, focusing on the right diversity in the leadership teams (see page 22)
* the progress and delivery against our people and cultural strategy, ambitions and related goals. Our ambition is to build a culture where people can be their best and make BT Group a brilliant place to work
* skills and organisational development; inclusion, equity and diversity; occupational health and wellbeing, and colleague engagement. Each of the Committee Chairs also reported back to the Board on the areas within their remit that are important indicators of the group’s culture.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 89
The Colleague Board was in place throughout most of FY24, and held three formal meetings, an additional meeting with Isabel Hudson, Maggie Chan Jones and Allison Kirkby, and a number of informal sessions with internal teams during the year. The Colleague Board’s views were sought on pan-BT Group programmes, including how these are aligned with our values and culture, and how we communicate these to our colleagues. The Colleague Board continued to successfully contribute to, and shape, some of our key initiatives this year by sharing different views and perspectives. This helped the Board and senior leadership to understand the perspectives of our colleagues on a range of different topics, and supported good decision-making practices.
There was a Q&A session at each meeting which enabled Colleague Board members to ask questions of the Chief Executive and Isabel and provided an opportunity for Colleague Board members to further understand key issues impacting the group and our colleagues. As in previous years, the Colleague Board was chaired by the Chief Executive. Members included Isabel and a number of colleagues from a diverse range of roles across the group. Sabine Chalmers, BT Group General Counsel, Company Secretary & Director Regulatory Affairs, and Athalie Williams, Chief Human Resources Officer, and two Openreach colleagues were also invited and attended all formal meetings. Other members of the Executive Committee attended meetings on a rotating basis and the Chairman and other Non-Executive Directors were able to attend meetings as observers. The Director of Internal Communications was invited to attend Colleague Board meetings and members were encouraged to feedback on key internal communications. The Deputy Company Secretary was secretary to the Colleague Board and he, or his delegate, attended all meetings and provided support, guidance and advice as required.
The last formal Colleague Board meeting was held in November 2023. A final meeting with members was held with Isabel, Maggie and Allison in February 2024 to thank Isabel and the Colleague Board members for their efforts over the years and to discuss the key topics for both Maggie, as the new Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, and Allison, as Chief Executive, to be aware of going forward.
At each formal Colleague Board meeting, the Board (via Isabel) and/or management had the opportunity to discuss topics on which they would like the Colleague Board members’ perspectives. Colleague Board members shared their insights on ‘hot topics’ in order to bring these to the attention of the Board and/or management. The Colleague Board raised and discussed a variety of topics, including those in the table above.
Isabel reported back to the Board and its Committees, as appropriate, on the discussions, providing the Board with a direct insight into colleague perspectives to help inform its decision making. During the year, Isabel updated the Remuneration Committee on sentiments being raised by our colleagues in relation to the remuneration of our workforce and related discussions. The Colleague Board meeting materials and notes of the meetings were also made available to the Board. The Chief Executive and Executive Committee members’ attendance, as well as the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, allowed for a mutual exchange of information, especially in relation to current ‘hot topics’, which was fed back into the Board and Executive Committee’s discussions and decision-making process throughout the year.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
One example was the feedback the Colleague Board provided on the pay review during the year which was discussed at both Colleague Board and Board meetings, ahead of a decision. Since its inception, the Colleague Board has been used alongside other colleague engagement mechanisms which will continue to be utilised and enhanced going forward. See page 41 for more information on how we engage with colleagues. With our colleagues Colleague Board members fed back to colleagues on the discussions from formal meetings as well as highlighting any other issues raised between meetings. Members were encouraged to connect via internal engagement channels including the People Networks and by reviewing the outputs of the Your Say engagement surveys to obtain an increased and broader understanding of colleagues’ views. Each Colleague Board member was invited to join the senior leadership team calls hosted by the Chief Executive throughout the year to give them additional perspectives on the group’s performance and strategic decisions.
The Colleague Board has been the Board’s chosen workforce engagement mechanism under the Code since 2019. During the year, as part of a review of our governance structures carried out by the Chairman, supported by the Company Secretary, the Board concluded that it was the appropriate time to re-evaluate the workforce engagement mechanism best suited to the group. The Board considered the workforce engagement structure and found that, whilst the Colleague Board has delivered on its aims to bring the colleague voice into the boardroom, a number of alternative approaches are available. The Board considered a number of factors including the overlap of the Colleague Board’s role with other colleague engagement mechanisms across the group, especially the change in frequency of the Your Say engagement surveys from annually to quarterly, and also the amount of work the Colleague Board members were undertaking to represent the colleague voice. After deliberation, the Board concluded that the Colleague Board should be disbanded and that the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement should engage in a comprehensive colleague outreach programme which will utilise the existing colleague engagement mechanisms across the group. The Board recognised the key role the Colleague Board has played in bringing the colleague voice into the boardroom for the last four years, and are appreciative of the passion and commitment of Colleague Board members over the years in aiming to make BTGroup a better workplace for all.
Additionally, as part of this review, and in light of Isabel’s tenure onthe Board, it was considered an appropriate time to appoint anew Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement. Maggie was appointed to succeed Isabel and will bring to the role her personal experience and insight, her focus oncoaching, and her championship of diversity, inclusivity and other colleague matters.
After another challenging year for our colleagues, I would like to thank the Colleague Board members for their continued contributions and valuable insight into colleague sentiment, which I have shared with the Board throughout the year. The thought-provoking questions and constructive challenges have greatly benefitted the Board’s decision-making process. I would like to congratulate Maggie on her new role and Iam confident she will continue to ensure thevoices of colleagues are clearly heard in theboardroom.
Isabel Hudson
Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement and a member of the Colleague Board (2019-2024)
Maggie will be undertaking a series of colleague engagement activities throughout FY25. The purpose of this engagement is to listen and understand colleagues’ views and perspectives, and enable her to communicate these back to the Board and integrate them into decision-making. Through this, the Board will continue to obtain direct insights into colleague sentiment at all stages of the decision-making process.
Maggie will receive a quarterly written report collated by the People, Ethics & Compliance team which will utilise the rich variety of data sources available on colleague sentiment across the group, including Your Say engagement survey results, inclusion, equity and diversity data, and internal communications insight reports. Whilst this report will be collated for Maggie as the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, she may consider it appropriate to share this with the wider Board.
The People, Ethics & Compliance team will also schedule regular colleague engagement sessions with Maggie to take place throughout FY25, through in person visits and virtual calls. During these sessions, colleagues will be encouraged to share personal views and experiences. These sessions will include meetings with the People Network leads, Trade Union representatives, and attending internal events. Sessions will also be scheduled with members of the reward team as appropriate, and in line with colleague events and ahead of colleague-related Board discussions, to ensure Maggie has insight into the colleague sentiment on relevant topics.
In 2024, as part of Maggie’s Board induction programme, Maggie visited two contact centres in Tyneside and Gosforth and listened in on customer calls and digital chats and participated in two town hall meetings with colleagues based at those locations. More information on Maggie’s induction programme can be found on page 95.
The reports, together with the colleague engagement sessions, will enable Maggie to provide the Board with a holistic view of colleague sentiment across the group, and help ensure that the colleague voice is represented in the boardroom. The effectiveness of engagement with our colleagues will be kept under review in FY25 and changes will be made where appropriate.
I have thoroughly enjoyed my first colleague engagement experiences and I am looking forward to engaging with our colleagues across the group. We are fortunate to have a wealth of insightful data available to provide an overview of our colleagues’ sentiment and I shall pair this with personal experience stories to provide the Board with a well rounded picture. My goal is to ensure that the colleague voice is represented in the boardroom and is considered throughout the Board’s decision-making process. Our colleagues are our most important asset and I am passionate about making sure they are able to inform the decisions we make toward success.
Maggie Chan Jones
Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement
In their discussions and decisions during FY24, the directors of BT Group plc have acted in the way that they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the group for the benefit of its members as a whole, having regard to stakeholders and the matters set out in sub-sections 172(1) (a)–(f) of the 2006 Act.
The Board considers the matters set out in section 172 of the 2006 Act in its discussions and decision making, including:
The likely consequence of any decision in the long-term: – The Directors recognise that the decisions they make today will affect the group’s long-term success. During the year, the Board had particular regard to this in its discussions on group strategy (see page 89). Our purpose and strategy demonstrate how we realise our ambition and grow value for all our stakeholders. This in turn guides the Board’s decisions, specifically the balance between short and long-term investments. The third pillar of ourstrategy – lead the way to a bright, sustainable future – incorporates our aim to identify and develop new business opportunities that will help us grow sustainably in the future. More information on our strategy can be found on pages 18 to29.
The impact of the group’s operations on the community and environment: – The Responsible Business Committee continues to oversee the progress of our Manifesto. This aims to accelerate growth through technology that is responsible, inclusive and sustainable, ensuring the group can continue to build trust and create value for its stakeholders. The Committee also monitors progress on the digital impact and sustainability strategy and our sustainability goals. During the year, the Committee considered and approved the group’s Carbon Abatement Methodology which formalises our goal to help our customers avoid 60m tonnes of carbon emissions through our products andservices (see page 105). – Information as to how we have addressed the recommendation of the TCFD framework can be found on pages 71 to 80.
The desirability of maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct: – The Board acknowledges its responsibility for setting and monitoring the culture, values and reputation of the group. Our colleagues are central to us achieving this ambition and we’re focused on building a culture where our colleagues can be their best. During the year, the Board considered the group’s culture in its decision making and discussions (see page 88). – The Audit & Risk Committee also considered regular reports from the General Counsel People, Ethics & Compliance on our ethics and compliance policies and programmes and reports on issues raised through Speak Up, BT Group’s confidential whistleblowing service (see page 102).# Corporate governance report
The interests of our colleagues, and the need to foster business relationships with our key stakeholders:
– The Board and its Committees understand the strategic importance of stakeholders to our business. When making decisions, the Directors have regard to the interests of colleagues, and the need to foster business relationships with other key stakeholders. We acknowledge that not every decision we make will necessarily result in a positive outcome for all our stakeholders, so the Board must balance competing interests in reaching its decisions.
– While the Board engages directly with stakeholders on some issues, the size and distribution of BT Group and our stakeholder groups means that stakeholder engagement often happens below Board level. However, the Board considers information from across the group to help it understand how our operations affect our stakeholders’ interests and views. More details on how we engage with key stakeholders (including customers and suppliers) on pages 40 to 45.
– Our colleagues are key to our success, and they are considered as part of the Board’s discussions and decision making. The Board and its Committees have reviewed colleague health and wellbeing, our inclusivity, equity and diversity ambitions, organisational culture and the impact of our transformation programmes, as well as on employee relations (see pages 30 to 33 for more details). More information on the Board’s engagement with colleagues can be found on pages 90 to 91 and other colleague engagement channels are set out on page 41.
The need to act fairly between BT Group’s shareholders:
– During FY24, the Chairman, Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer, other executives and the Investor Relations team held 222 meetings with investors (see page 43 for more detail on our engagement with shareholders). These meetings gave investors the opportunity to discuss views on all matters including:
– our strategy and competitive position in key markets
– our financial and operational performance
– capital investment (including FTTP and 5G)
– our capital allocation policy
– prospective governmental and regulatory policy decisions
– our pension fund valuation.
– The Board is mindful of having two significant shareholders but considers any decisions it makes in the interests of all shareholders.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 92
The following are some of the decisions made by the Board during the year which demonstrate how section 172 matters have been taken into account as part of Board discussions and decision making:
| Decision | What happened |
|---|---|
| Sale of BT Tower to MCR London Holdings Limited | During the year, the Board discussed in detail the proposal to sell the BT Tower to MCR London Holdings Limited, in particular: – the need for future investment in the maintenance of the BT Tower – how this fits with the simplification of the group’s property portfolio – the costs and timescale for exiting the BT Tower – the plans that had been put in place to mitigate risks to the network functionality of the BT Tower – the approach that would be taken to relocate impacted colleagues who are currently based at the BT Tower – the brand association element of the transaction, including the risks associated with permitting the use of the BT brand and, if permitted, ensuring that relevant brand protections are in place – the broader potential reputational impact of the sale. On balance, the Board considered the long-term benefits of the sale, including the reduction in property running costs, and agreed that these outweighed any risks. Having carefully considered the transaction terms, in February 2024, the Board approved the sale of the BT Tower to MCR London Holdings Limited for £275m with an anticipated completion date in FY30. |
| BT Pension Scheme (BTPS) triennial valuation | The Board was kept updated on negotiations with the BTPS Trustee on the triennial funding valuation as at 30 June 2023. This included consideration of the range of possible funding deficit outcomes and the associated deficit repair contributions. The Board was also reminded of its obligations under the Pension Schemes Act 2021 and the approach of the Pensions Regulator. The Board considered the contractual protections previously provided to the BTPS and their prospective suitability. Specifically, the Board considered the circumstances in which it would be obliged to make additional payments to the BTPS because of cash disposals, dividends or share buy-backs made. The Board also reviewed the stabiliser mechanism and co-investment vehicle established as part of the 30 June 2020 valuation, and considered the likelihood of additional payments being triggered and future refunds being received. The Board considered the group’s capital allocation framework and the associated impact on its key stakeholders. The Board noted the need to balance its objective to invest for growth, whilst supporting the BT pension funds, maintaining a strong balance sheet and rewarding investors through its progressive dividend policy. In October 2023, after careful consideration, the Board approved the proposed package of measures which would form the 2023 valuation. |
| Impacts of prior Board decision: funding of increased and accelerated FTTP build plan from 20m to 25m premises by December 2026 | Summary of decision: In 2020, the Board approved the increase of our FTTP build to 20m premises, subject to the outcome of Ofcom’s Wholesale Fixed Telecoms Market Review (WFTMR). Post the WFTMR, in May 2021, the Board further approved an increased and accelerated FTTP build to 25m premises by the end of December 2026. This was a difficult decision and in making it, the Board considered competing stakeholder interests, including the benefits to our customers, colleagues and shareholders, the impact on communities and the desire to support the Government’s fibre ambitions. Impacts and outcomes: As a result of this Board decision, our rollout of the FTTP network now passes 13.8m homes and businesses, helping to better connect our customers. This year, we passed an average of 68,000 premises per week. 4.7m customers have now moved across and are enjoying the service and benefits of full fibre. Our full fibre network now also passes 3.9m rural premises a, which has added value to local communities and helped bring people together, supporting our purpose of we connect for good. We brought full fibre broadband to Fair Isle, one of the UK’s most geographically remote islands and Openreach had to reroute the build by 100km, in order to avoid protected landscapes and bird nesting season. As a result of this Board decision, our rollout of the FTTP network now passes 13.8m homes and businesses, helping to better connect our customers. 13.8m a Rural premises are defined according to Ofcom’s Area 3 classification. |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 93
In line with the Code, we annually undertake a formal and rigorous evaluation of the performance of the Board and its Committees, the Chairman and individual directors, which considers the Board’s composition, diversity and effectiveness. The last external evaluation was completed in 2021. Given the changing composition of the Board (including a new Chief Executive) we did not feel it was the right time for a once in three year external evaluation. We therefore engaged Lintstock Limited on a multi-year basis. Lintstock is an accredited Board Performance Reviewer of the Chartered Governance Institute, with no other links to the group. This year, they facilitated an evaluation of our Board and Committees via questionnaires. A more thorough, interview-based review by Lintstock, will take place in FY25, at which point there will be a more stable foundation in our Board to review and in turn, the evaluation will provide greater value in terms of forward looking focus areas.
Tailored questionnaires were circulated to members, regular attendees and the secretary of the Board and each of its Committees. The Executive Committee and CEO, Openreach also completed an evaluation to provide their perspectives on the effectiveness of, and relationship with, the Board. The evaluations were prepared by Lintstock in line with best practice. These focused on composition, dynamics, succession and how well-placed the Board is to add value to the business, in terms of how it oversees strategy, risk management, colleagues, culture and performance. Focus was also given to core areas of governance, the Board’s decision making processes, as well as how well it considers stakeholders as part of its discussions. The Senior Independent Director undertook a discussion with the other Non-Executive Directors and Deputy Company Secretary, without the Chairman present, to obtain their feedback and views of the Chairman’s performance during the year. The outcomes and recommendations were fed back to the Chairman. Lintstock reflected on the responses and feedback, and compiled reports for the Board and each of the Committees, formulating a number of key observations and suggested priorities for the coming year, ensuring the anonymity of respondents was respected. See the table opposite for more detail.
| Agreed actions/actions in progress |
|---|
| Support for the Chief Executive to focus on priorities Support Allison Kirkby in her role as Chief Executive with a focus on culture and talent. Talent breakfasts have been scheduled with the Board in FY25 to enhance visibility of potential Executive Committee successors in an informal setting. |
| Board composition Consider and appoint additional Non-Executive Directors to the Board with financial, telecommunications and regulatory experience. Tushar Morzaria was appointed as an Independent Non-Executive Director in May 2024. |
On appointment, Directors undertake a comprehensive induction programme designed to give them a thorough overview and understanding of the business. This is tailored to take into account the director’s previous experience, their responsibilities and, for each Non-Executive Director, the specific responsibilities relevant to their Committee memberships. The programme includes meetings with the Chairman, Board members, the Executive Committee and senior management. Directors also receive key information on our strategy and KPIs, governance framework, the regulatory framework in which we operate, recent financial performance, risk management and internal control systems and the policies supporting our business practices. Directors are encouraged to visit our different hubs, contact centres and BT/EE retail shops, as well as spend a day with an Openreach engineer. Details on the Board changes made during the year can be found in the Nominations Committee Chair’s Report on page 97.
Maggie and Ruth joined the Board on 1 March and 6 April 2023 respectively as Independent Non-Executive Directors. Maggie is the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement and Ruth was appointed as Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Remuneration Committee from the conclusion of the 2023 AGM. Both Maggie and Ruth are members of the Nominations Committee, Maggie is a member of the Responsible Business Committee and Ruth is a member of the Audit & Risk Committee.
Maggie and Ruth received an induction pack with key reference materials that provided them with a thorough understanding of BTGroup, including the most recent financial results, information on our strategy and each of our business units, the governance framework, director responsibilities, ethical policies and theCommitments. Throughout their first few months on the Board, Maggie and Ruth individually held a number of induction meetings including with the Chairman, Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer, and members of the Executive Committee and key senior leaders, including the Director of Investor Relations, the heads of the business units, as well as the CEO, Openreach.
The sessions included the following areas:
– Group Strategy
– Consumer
– Business
– Openreach
– Corporate Affairs
– Digital, Data & AI
– Security & Networks
– HR & our colleagues
– Financial processes, funding and risk management
– Regulatory context
– Governance.
In addition, Ruth met with the Group Director of Reward given her role as Chair of the Remuneration Committee and Matthew Key, in his capacity as Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee.
In May 2023, Maggie and Ruth joined Clive Selley, CEO, Openreach on an Openreach field visit in different locations across London and Essex, which provided them with a deeper insight into our fibre rollout and the experiences of colleagues in these roles. In February 2024, Maggie and Ruth visited our Tyneside and Gosforth contact centres. They met with a range of colleagues and benefitted from seeing our strategic plans for the customer facing, front line part of the business come to life. They listened in on customer calls and digital chats and were guest speakers at the two colleague town hall meetings where they had the opportunity to listen to colleagues and answer questions. For Maggie, as the new Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, this visit was invaluable in providing her with a better understanding of BT Group priorities and our strategy relating to colleagues. Further detail can be found in the colleague engagement section on page 90 to 91.
The part that’s always the most impactful for me was seeing and experiencing our teams in action.
Maggie Chan Jones
Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement
Maggie Chan Jones
Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement
Ruth Cairnie
Senior Independent Non-Executive Director
This year, on behalf of the Board, the Committee led the process to appoint Allison as our new Chief Executive. We also welcomed new directors to the Board, Ruth, Raphael and Tushar. I look forward to supporting Allison and our newest Board members as we drive our long-term strategy to transform the group, ensuring it delivers for all our stakeholders.
Adam Crozier
Chair of the Nominations Committee
15 May 2024
The Committee is responsible on behalf of the Board for reviewing:
– the structure, size and composition of the Board and its committees to ensure an appropriate balance of skills, experience, diversity, independence and knowledge
– succession planning for the Board and recommending the appointment of Executive and Non-Executive Directors and theChairman
– succession planning and performance of the Executive Committee.
The Committee’s key responsibilities are set out in its terms of reference available at bt.com/governance
All Non-Executive Directors are members, with the Chief Executive attending meetings where appropriate. The Deputy Company Secretary is secretary to the Committee and he, or his delegate, attends all meetings and provides guidance, advice and support as required. Committee members and attendees do not attend discussions where a conflict exists.
During the year, five scheduled Committee meetings were held. After each meeting, as Chair, I reported back to the Board on the Committee’s activities.
| Meetings attended | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Crozier (Chair) | 5/5 | |||||||||
| Steven Guggenheimer e | 4/5 | |||||||||
| Adel Al-Saleh a | 3/4 | |||||||||
| Isabel Hudson | 5/5 | |||||||||
| Ruth Cairnie b | 4/4 | |||||||||
| Matthew Key | 5/5 | |||||||||
| Maggie Chan Jones c | 4/5 | |||||||||
| Allison Kirkby f | 4/5 | |||||||||
| Ian Cheshire d | 1/1 | |||||||||
| Raphael Kübler g | 1/1 | |||||||||
| Iain Conn d | 1/1 | |||||||||
| Sara Weller | 5/5 |
a Adel attended all bar one meeting where he was excused and he stepped down from the Board and this Committee on 31 December 2023.
b Ruth joined the Board on 6 April 2023.
c Maggie gave apologies for the September meeting due to a pre-existing conflict.
d Ian and Iain stepped down from the Board and this Committee at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM.
e Steven gave apologies for the July meeting due to a pre-existing conflict.
f Allison attended all Committee meetings during the year as a Non-Executive Director except for the July meeting where she was excused.
g Raphael joined the Board and this Committee on 30 January 2024.
Details on the FY24 Board and Committee evaluation can be found on page 94.
As announced during the year, Philip Jansen informed the Board that he intended to step down from his role as BT Group Chief Executive. As a result, a sub-set of the Committee spent significant time building on the Board’s succession plans and focusing on appointing the next Chief Executive, which ultimately culminated in Allison’s appointment.
In the first half of the year, we commenced a formal succession process to appoint the next Chief Executive, to succeed Philip Jansen. As Chairman, I led the process, with a sub-set of the Committee. Allison was not present for any of these discussions. Spencer Stuart, an independent external search agency, who has no other connection to the BT Group, or any of the Directors, was appointed to facilitate the process. Spencer Stuart is a signatory of the Voluntary Code of Conduct for Executive Search Firms (in line with our Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy).
Further to a discussion on the essential experience, leadership and personal characteristics, capabilities and skills required, and having considered the future needs of the business, a candidate profile was agreed. In line with that profile, a shortlist of appropriate, diverse candidates was considered. A comprehensive benchmarking, assessment and interview process was conducted. The sub-committee focused on understanding candidates’ approaches to the role of Chief Executive, their styles of leadership, and the culture they would foster throughout the organisation. It discussed feedback on the individuals and reflected on each of the shortlisted candidates based on their skills, capabilities and experience, against the role profile. The Committee subsequently concluded that Allison was the preferred candidate to succeed Philip as Chief Executive, given her proven leadership, deep sector experience and history of having transformed businesses.# Corporate governance report
Further to the Committee’s recommendation, in which they also considered her external commitments outside of this role, a sub-committee of the Board approved the appointment of Allison as Chief Executive. Allison became Chief Executive on 1 February 2024.
The Committee also spent time considering additional Non- Executive Directors. Russell Reynolds Associates, an independent external search consultant, who has no other connection to the BT Group, and who is a signatory of the Voluntary Code of Conduct for Executive Search Firms, was engaged to assist with the search. In light of changes to the Board over the past year, the Committee prioritised the skills, experience and background when considering new Board appointments. As such, the search was predominantly for candidates with financial experience to supplement the capabilities of the Audit & Risk Committee, especially in light of Allison stepping down from the Committee on her appointment as Chief Executive, CEO experience potentially in a transformation focused role, and regulatory experience. As in all searches, diversity continued to be a key consideration. Russell Reynolds was tasked with enabling us to make appointments that meet the aims and targets of our Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy and related targets and succession planning. In line with the brief, the Committee agreed a shortlist of candidates with Russell Reynolds, with discussions held around ensuring the shortlist was diverse from both a gender and ethnicity perspective. A sub-set of the Committee was formed to lead the process, comprising of the Senior Independent Director (and Chair of the Remuneration Committee), and the Chairs of the Audit & Risk and Responsible Business Committees, as well as the Chief Executive. Further to a comprehensive benchmarking, assessment and interview process, the sub-committee discussed feedback and made its recommendation to the Board.
In April 2024, on recommendation from the Committee, the Board approved in principle the appointment of Tushar Morzaria as an Independent Non-Executive Director. Final approval was delegated to the Chairman and Company Secretary and they subsequently approved Tushar’s appointment with effect from 7May 2024. Tushar brings a wealth of strategic financial management experience to our Board, gained over 25 years where he has overseen transformation programmes and has strengthened risk and control frameworks. Tushar is a member of the Audit & Risk Committee and has recent and relevant financial experience in line with the Code, as well as being a member of this Committee and the Remuneration Committee. The Committee and the Board considered Tushar’s other external commitments as part of this appointment process and more details on this can be found opposite.
Throughout the year, the Committee reviewed:
– and approved the creation of a new Executive Committee role reporting to the Chief Executive titled the Chief Strategy and Change Officer to lead a new Strategy and Change unit. The purpose of the Chief Strategy and Change Officer role is to:
– drive the development of BT Group’s corporate strategy
– ensure alignment of Unit strategies with the corporate strategy
– develop a single, aligned strategic narrative and equity story for BT Group
– define, drive and integrate critical, cross-Unit change programmes to deliver against the BT Group objectives.
– the performance and succession planning of Executive Committee members.
The Committee continues to focus on broader Executive Committee succession planning, including oversight of the talent pipeline with a focus on diversity – key talent at the senior leadership level. The Committee reflected on the importance of identifying critical roles and building stronger and broader diversity of experience, gender and ethnicity, as well as commercial, technology and transformation capabilities, both through potential external candidates and through our internal talent pipeline.
– external appointments of Executive Committee members, in line with our policy on external interests for Executive Committee members (including Executive Directors) and the CEO, Openreach. Under this policy, proposed external directorships and other significant external interests must not be to an organisation that is a BT Group competitor/major supplier to BT Group, create a conflict of interest for the individual with their role at BT Group, involve significant amounts of BT Group working hours or impede the ability of the individual to perform their BT Group role, or involve disproportionate incentives or remuneration, with reference to the time commitment of the role. Any fees or other incentives arising from such appointments may be retained by the individual, subject to the amount being proportionate.
On accepting their appointment, Directors must confirm they are able to allocate sufficient time to discharge their responsibilities effectively. Directors are expected to attend meetings of the Board and any Committees of which they are members, as well as the AGM and Board off-sites. Directors are also expected to devote sufficient time to prepare for each meeting and to participate in other site or office visits to understand the business better.
Before accepting new external appointments, directors are required to obtain the prior approval of the Board. Before recommending that the Board approve the appointment of Allison Kirkby as Chief Executive, the Committee considered her other commitments, notably her directorship of Brookfield Asset Management Limited. The Committee considered the time commitment to be reasonable and was comfortable that Allison’s directorship at Brookfield would not affect her ability to dedicate sufficient time to the group in her new role as Chief Executive or create any conflicts of interest. It’s also within the overboarding guidelines published by proxy agencies.
The Committee also considered Simon Lowth’s proposed appointment to the Board of Smith & Nephew as an Independent Non-Executive Director and as a member of their Audit and Nomination & Governance Committees. The Committee considered the role and the time commitment it would require and was comfortable that Simon would still have sufficient time to dedicate to his role at BT Group if he was to take on this external commitment.
As part of the Committee’s decision to appoint Tushar Morzaria tothe Board, it thoroughly considered his other commitments, notably his roles as a Non-Executive Director of both Legal & General Group and BP. Tushar also chairs the Audit Committee for both companies. The Committee considered corporate governance guidance including the overboarding guidelines published by proxy agencies. On balance, both the Committee and the Board were comfortable that Tushar’s other commitments were acceptable and would not affect his ability to dedicate sufficient time to the group in his new role as a Independent Non-Executive Director or create any conflicts of interest. The Committee and the Board were in agreement that Tushar’s skills and experience would be a strong addition to the Board and proceeded to appoint him with effect from 7 May 2024.
The Committee considered, in respect of each director, their skills and experience, time commitment and tenure as part of its recommendation to the Board in relation to the directors put forward for election or re-election at the AGM. The Board believes that each director it has recommended to shareholders for election or re-election at the 2024 AGM brings considerable knowledge, wide-ranging skills and experience to the Board, makes an effective and valuable contribution and continues to demonstrate commitment to their role.
On recommendation from the Committee, the Board also considered the continued independence of Non-Executive Directors as part of its consideration of the re-election recommendations. The Board continues to consider all Non-Executive Directors as being independent in line with the Code, with the exception of Deutsche Telekom’s nominated representative. The Chairman was judged to be independent at the time of his appointment. Details of directors’ contracts or letters of appointment are in the Annual remuneration report on page 121.
The Chairman and the Company Secretary keep the training and development needs of Directors under review. Non-Executive Directors regularly meet with management, enhancing their understanding of the business through briefing sessions. We encourage all Directors to keep their skills and knowledge up to date and to ask for any support they need. As part of ongoing development, the Company Secretary (or her delegate) briefs the Board and its Committees at each meeting, as relevant, on any key legal, regulatory and corporate governance developments. During the year, these briefings included updates on the new Code, institutional investor guidelines, the FTSE Women Leaders Review, the Parker Review and other governance publications. Directors are updated as required on developments in the environment in which the group operates and internal and external advisers are invited to meetings to provide updates as necessary.
Under its remit, the Committee has a responsibility to consider changes to the Openreach Limited Board and recommend any changes to the BT Group Board for approval. During the year, the Committee noted that the Openreach Chair and Openreach Non- Executive Directors continue to satisfy the independence criteria and should continue in their roles.# Inclusion, equity and diversity
The Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy sets out our approach to diversity on the Board and our aim to have a well-balanced Board with the appropriate skills, knowledge, experience and diversity to meet our business needs and support our strategic aim of building the strongest foundations (see bt.com/governance). The policy ensures we:
– apply an inclusion lens to all our decision-making processes
– monitor the impact of our decisions on diverse populations
– value and communicate the benefits that difference brings and are unapologetic in our pursuit of a diverse workforce at all levels
– actively seek out opportunities across the business to enhance and strengthen our approach to inclusion.
Whilst we appoint candidates based on merit, we continue to challenge our external search consultants to ensure that all forms of diversity are considered when drawing up candidate lists. This is a key consideration for our searches. Diversity is considered in the broadest sense and all forms of difference are considered, including age, gender, nationality, independence, professional background, social and ethnic backgrounds, business and geographic experience, as well as cognitive and personal strengths. These are considered in reviewing the composition of the Board and, where possible, are appropriately balanced. We believe a key driver in delivering our diversity commitments across the organisation is through a Board which has this balance of skills, experience, diversity and knowledge. As at 31 March 2024, five of our ten Board directors were female (50%), two directors were from an ethnic minority background (20%), and one director has a disability. Ruth Cairnie’s appointment during the year as Senior Independent Non-Executive Director ensures that we meet the requirements of the Listing Rules to have female representation in at least one of the four senior board positions. This position was reinforced by Allison’s appointment as Chief Executive from 1 February 2024, meaning that half of the four senior board positions are now held by women. Details of the group’s inclusion, equity and diversity strategy, including its objectives, implementation and progress can be found on pages 31 to 33.
As at 31 March 2024
| Post 2024 AGM | BT Group plc Board | Senior positions on the Board (CEO, CFO, SID and Chair) | Executive management (Executive Committee, including the Executive Directors and the CEO, Openreach) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| as at 31 March 2024 | post 2024 AGM | as at 31 March 2024 | post 2024 AGM | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 5 (50%) | 6 (60%) | 2 | 2 |
| Female | 5 (50%) | 4 (40%) | 2 | 2 |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Asian/Asian British | 1 (10%) | 2 (20%) | 1 (10%) | |
| Mixed/multiple ethnic groups | 1 (10%) | 1 (10%) | 1 (10%) | |
| White British or other White background a | 8 (80%) | 7 (70%) | 4 | 4 |
| Disability | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Senior leaders b | ||||
| Female | 28 (33%) | |||
| Male | 56 (67%) |
a This includes the Minority-white group.
b This includes the Executive Committee, including the Company Secretary and CEO, Openreach and their direct reports (excluding the Executive Directors).
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
98
Corporate governance report
Board composition, succession and evaluation continued
Nominations Committee Chair’s report continued
This year, the Committee has continued to focus its oversight on the group’s risk, control and assurance framework and has also spent considerable time scrutinising the major legal claims the BT Group is facing.
Matthew Key
Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee
15 May 2024
The Committee is responsible on behalf of the Board for:
– monitoring the integrity of the financial statements and overseeing the financial reporting process
– reviewing the effectiveness of the group’s systems of risk management and internal control
– reviewing the effectiveness of the internal audit function
– approving the appointment, reappointment, remuneration of the external auditor, as well as the terms of the engagement and the provision of any non-audit services, overseeing the external auditor’s independence and effectiveness in delivering a quality audit.
From 1 April 2024, and following the disbanding of the BT Compliance Committee, the Committee’s remit expanded to include oversight of the group’s compliance with the Commitments. Further detail on how the Committee has fulfilled these responsibilities will be included in next year’s report. The Committee’s key responsibilities are set out in its terms of reference available at bt.com/governance
The Committee members are all Independent Non-Executive Directors with a range of skills, and the Committee as a whole has experience relevant to the sector and acts independently of management. Throughout the year, Allison attended all Committee meetings in her capacity as a Non-Executive Director and both she and I have recent and relevant business and financial experience, in line with the Code, as set out in our biographies. Allison stepped down from the Committee on her appointment as Chief Executive in February 2024. Tushar Morzaria was appointed to the Board and this Committee in May 2024 and has recent and relevant financial experience. The Deputy Company Secretary is secretary to the Committee and he, or his delegate, attends all meetings and provides guidance, advice and support as required. The Chairman, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer attend Committee meetings as required. Private Committee sessions with the Non-Executive Directors and the internal and external auditor were held at each meeting without management being present. The external auditor was not present at meetings where their performance and/or their remuneration was discussed.
| Matthew Key (Chair) | Iain Conn b | Ruth Cairnie a | Allison Kirkby c | Ian Cheshire b | Sara Weller | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/6 | 2/2 | 5/5 | 6/6 | 2/2 | 6/6 |
a Ruth joined the Committee on her appointment to the Board on 6 April 2023.
b Ian and Iain stepped down from the Board and this Committee at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM.
c Allison ceased being a member of the Committee when she became Chief Executive on 1 February 2024 but still attends meetings in her capacity as Chief Executive.
Other attendee (x Regular attendee • Attends as required)
Details on the FY24 Board and Committee evaluation can be found on page 94.
The Committee met six times this year. As Committee Chair, I met with the KPMG lead audit partner, Director of Group Internal Audit and Group Risk, and management as appropriate ahead of meetings to discuss specific items of focus to report to the Committee. After each meeting, I also reported back to the Board on the Committee’s activities, the main issues discussed and matters of particular relevance, with the Board receiving copies of the Committee’s meeting papers and minutes.
During the year, the Committee considered the full year and half year results, and the Q1 and Q3 trading updates. It reviewed the quality of accounting policies and practices, as well as critical accounting estimates and judgements. The Committee considered, and was satisfied with:
– the processes supporting the preparation and consolidation of the financial statements, including consistent application of the accounting policies, and the ongoing verification by management and the external auditor
– management’s accounting judgements and the appropriate application of the accounting policies, having also discussed these with the external auditor.
The Committee exercised its judgement when considering matters related to the financial statements, and recommended approval by the Board of each of our full year and half year results, Q1 and Q3 trading updates and the Annual Report.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
99
Corporate governance report
Audit, risk and internal control
Audit & Risk Committee Chair’s Report
| Focus | Considered by the Committee | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | Results/trading updates and accounting judgements | Apr May Jul Sep Oct Jan | |
| Annual Report 2023 | |||
| Regulatory financial statements | |||
| Going concern assessment | |||
| Viability statement | |||
| Litigation and major contentious matters | |||
| Internal controls over financial reporting | GRCs and CFU risk reviews: point and emerging risks | ||
| Report from Openreach Board, Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee chair | |||
| Compliance with Code requirements | risk management framework | ||
| Ethics & compliance | Ethics & compliance programmes | ||
| Speak Up (whistleblowing) reports | |||
| Internal audit | Internal audit report | ||
| FY24 group internal audit plan and approach | |||
| Group internal audit charter | |||
| Effectiveness | |||
| External audit | KPMG | ||
| External audit report | |||
| External audit plan | |||
| Audit and non-audit fees | |||
| Effectiveness | |||
| Independence and reappointment | |||
| Fair, balanced and understandable |
In May 2024, the Committee reviewed the Annual Report 2024 having previously fed back on earlier drafts. The Committee concluded that the Annual Report, taken as a whole, was fair, balanced and understandable and provided the information necessary for shareholders to assess the group’s position, performance, business model and strategy, and the potential impact on forward-looking assumptions supporting going concern and viability assessments.# Corporate governance report
Significant matters related to the financial statements and how these were addressed:
The Committee considered the accounting policies and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements regarding critical and key accounting estimates and significant judgements as summarised in note 2 of the financial statements. These include the estimate of our customer refund liability, our goodwill impairment assessment, determining the point of sale of BT Tower, the valuation of our pensions assets and liabilities, taxation, contingent liabilities associated with litigation, provisions, determination of lease terms including reasonable certainty, and valuation of investments in the Sports joint venture. More detail on the Committee’s oversight of these matters is set out below where appropriate.
The Committee considered management’s forecasts of group cash flows and net debt, as well as the group’s liquidity requirements and borrowing facilities, including downside scenarios from the viability model as discussed below. Following this review and a discussion of the sensitivities, it confirmed that the going concern basis of accounting continues to be an appropriate basis of preparation for the financial statements and recommended it for approval by the Board. See page 126.
The Committee reviewed the process and assessment of the group’s prospects, taking into account the group’s current position and principal risks. The Committee also considered the group risks in management’s stress testing model, including the review of downside scenarios and a combined ‘severe but plausible’ scenario where multiple interconnected risks materialise. The Committee was satisfied that the viability statement could be provided and recommended it for approval by the Board. See pages 81 to 82.
The Committee reviewed contingent liabilities associated with litigation and major contentious matters throughout the year. There has been a noted increase in the value of the gross risk faced by the Group, which is largely as a result of the increasing prevalence of collective proceedings (sometimes known as class actions) in the UK. During the year, the Committee has placed particular focus on understanding and scrutinising legal assessments by the Group’s external and internal legal advisers of the claims that have materialised, to ensure the adequacy of its provisions.
The Committee considered and discussed the risk of billing inaccuracy and control deficiencies that had been identified in Business in relation to legacy systems and processes. They discussed the impact of these including potential customer impacts. The Committee also spent time understanding the associated potential revenue risk, the root causes, the approach to prioritise a remediation plan and considered the different approaches of estimating what the potential liability may be. The Committee considered and was satisfied with the judgements for the liability.
The Committee received and discussed the key assumptions, operating cash flow forecasts, resulting headroom or impairment and the sensitivity analysis performed by management. They spent time understanding the balance of the plans and the uncertainty around the different judgements contained within it. The Committee considered and was satisfied with the key assumptions and agreed that a goodwill impairment charge was required in FY24 for Business.
The Committee considered the accounting for the sale of BT Tower, including the judgement made in concluding that control of the Tower passes to the buyer on completion of the sale and transfer of legal title, rather than on exchange of contracts in FY24.
The Committee reviewed the judgements in relation to the sports joint venture with Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc., which has been in place for over 12 months, including assessments of the JV business performance, cash flow forecasts and the valuation of BT Group’s interest in the JV.
The Committee considered the assumptions and judgements underlying the valuation of the pension assets and liabilities in the financial statements, as summarised in note 19 to the consolidated financial statements. It also considered the range of reasonable assumptions and the associated impacts on the balance sheet, income statement and related disclosures.
The Committee reviewed the judgements made in relation to the group’s divestments, including on whether the held for sale criteria had been satisfied, and how goodwill should be allocated to divested or held for sale entities.
The Committee supported the processes and systems enhancements that were implemented to ensure that the group met its 2024 regulatory financial reporting obligations.
The Committee reviewed specific items quarterly, and considered and agreed that they were appropriately categorised. It considered management’s view of the quality of earnings, definition of alternative performance measures and of the effective tax rate. It also challenged the phasing of working capital within normalised free cash flow. At each quarter, it considered a detailed assessment of provisions, and the Committee was satisfied with the analysis provided in relation to the results.
The group has continued to enhance its risk, control and assurance framework. This framework provides the tools to enable us to be smart with risk and to manage enduring risks consistently and efficiently across the group. Further information on our risk management framework and principal risks can be found on pages 61 to 70. The framework divides the risk landscape into areas of enduring risk called Group Risks Categories (GRCs), which cover strategic, financial, operational and compliance risks.
The Board monitored the effectiveness of the group’s systems of risk management and internal controls through reviews of the GRCs and consideration of reports from management, as well as from internal audit and other assurance functions. Much of this work was undertaken by this Committee on the Board’s behalf. Given that the Board is ultimately responsible for the group’s systems of risk management and internal controls, as Chair, I subsequently reported the key matters from each of these sessions to the Board. The activities carried out during the year, collectively enable the Committee to confirm that the group’s systems of risk management and internal control have been appropriately reviewed. Where required, targeted improvements have been planned or agreed to continue to transform our control environment and to appropriately manage risks.
As part of its drive for continuous improvement, the Committee has overseen ongoing enhancements to the risk management framework. Further information on improvements being made to the overall risk management framework, as well as specific actions taken to manage our principal risks can be found on pages 61 to 62.
The Committee held discussions on the GRCs with the Executive Committee risk owners to understand current and anticipated risk developments, and reviewed how effectively the risks are being managed. It considered the risk appetite and its supporting metrics for the GRCs, the effectiveness of the controls, mitigation activities and any areas for improvement. The Committee robustly assessed both current, specific concerns (point risks) and uncertainties that may materialise in the future (emerging risks), particularly as a consequence of adverse changes to the economic, social, regulatory, political or technology environment, or as an unintended consequence of new products and services being offered or developed by the group. The Committee agreed with management any actions required to manage or mitigate these risks effectively.
In addition, with the CFU and CU CEOs, the Committee undertook unit risk reviews of Consumer, Business and Openreach, as well as Digital and Networks, which cover how the GRCs are being managed in the respective units, and the significant point and emerging risks. As well as the rolling programme of reviewing the GRCs and units, the Committee received updates on specific matters including supply chain and geopolitical risks in specific jurisdictions and our group-wide data programme.
The Committee considered regular reports on our ethics and compliance policies, and programmes and related learnings and culture. It spent time discussing anti-bribery and corruption, communications regulation compliance and the enhancement programme in relation to international trade, in line with the respective GRCs. Each quarter, the Committee received and reviewed reports on concerns raised through the Speak Up service, BT Group’s confidential whistleblowing services operated by an independent company, 24 hours a day, in multiple languages, for both written and telephone reports.# Corporate governance report
The Committee ensures that arrangements are in place for the proportionate and independent investigation of these and other matters via the ethics and relevant subject matter expert team.
Internal audit
Internal audit provides independent, objective and timely assurance to senior management and the Board, through this Committee, over the design and operational effectiveness of key processes and controls that manage the risks across the organisation.
During the year, the Committee:
* reviewed and approved the group internal audit annual plan, ensuring it aligned to the principal risks of the business
* reviewed the internal audit charter, which establishes internal audit’s independence, authority, remit and reporting lines to conduct its work
* received regular reports from internal audit on its activities and progress against the group internal audit plan, allowing the Committee to monitor delivery against the plan
* held in-depth discussions with management on all internal audit reports where controls were assessed as ‘inadequate’, and action plans to address these.
The actions were tracked by the Committee, including the responsiveness of management to the findings and recommendations, and the progress of closing any overdue actions.
An internal audit effectiveness review was completed during the year by the new Director of Group Internal Audit and Group Risk with support from a third party. Actions were agreed to ensure the function continues to develop. Based on this and the Committee’s annual assessment of the performance and effectiveness of the function, the Committee concluded that internal audit continues to add value in the context of the group’s overall assurance framework.
External audit
The Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board on the reappointment of the external auditor, determining their independence from the group and its management and agreeing the scope and fee for the audit. The Committee concluded that the reappointment of KPMG should be recommended to shareholders at the 2024 AGM.
Following the audit tender in FY17, KPMG was appointed as BT Group’s external auditor from the conclusion of the 2018 AGM. The FY24 audit is KPMG’s sixth audit of BT Group. Following a thorough review of potential candidates put forward by KPMG to succeed John Luke as lead audit partner, the Committee approved the appointment of Jon Mills as the KPMG lead audit partner for the BT Group with effect from the start of FY24.
During the year, the Committee:
* considered and approved the proposed external audit fees for the year ended 31 March 2024, including one-off fees, as well as the recurring audit fee for the regulatory financial statements and the interim review fee (see the Independent auditor’s report on pages 132 to 143 for more details)
* reviewed with the external auditor, the external auditor’s scope of work, audit plan and strategy for FY24
* approved the engagement letter of the external auditor
* recommended approval by the Board of management’s letters of representation.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 102
Corporate governance report
Audit, risk and internal control continued
Audit & Risk Committee Chair’s Report continued
As part of my year-end report to the Board, I informed the Board of the outcome of the external audit. BT Group confirms that it complies with the EU Regulation on Audit Reform and the Competition and Markets Authority’s Statutory Audit Services Order with regard to mandatory auditor rotation and tendering.
Independence and non-audit services
The Committee discussed the external auditor’s independence and potential areas that could give rise to a conflict of interest, and considered the safeguards in place to prevent compromising their independence and objectivity. In particular, the Committee considered BT’s provision of network and mobile services to KPMG UK, including KPMG’s assessment and conclusion of independence. The Committee considered this and confirmed its agreement that the provision of these services to KPMG is not material from an independence perspective.
BT Group’s non-audit services policy sets out the non-audit services that can be provided by the external auditor, in line with the latest ethical standards. The external auditor is not permitted to perform any work which they may later be required to audit, or which might affect their objectivity and independence, or create a conflict of interest. Internal procedures describe the approval process for work performed by the external auditor, and these applied to KPMG throughout the year. The Committee monitored compliance with the policies and procedures and considered business relationships with the external auditor, and the level and appropriateness of non-audit services and fees. The Committee will continue to keep under review BT Group’s non-audit services policy. Our non-audit services policy can be found at bt.com/governance
The Committee reviewed the confirmation and information received from the external auditor on the arrangements that it has in place to safeguard auditor independence and objectivity, which are consistent with the ethical standards published by the FRC, including specific safeguards where they provide permissible non-audit services to the group. The nature of the non-audit services carried out by the external auditor during the year are described in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements on page 161. These were required by law or regulation to be carried out by an appointed auditor and services that support us to fulfil obligations required by law or regulation, contractual requirements, or represented areas of assurance work where it was materially more efficient for the external auditor to be engaged, as opposed to another third party due to the work completed in relation to the audit, and which were permitted to be performed by an auditor under the Revised Ethical Standard 2019.
Audit-related assurance services, as well as any approved non-audit services performed by KPMG, are considered a low threat to auditor independence. Non-audit services are predominantly made up of audit-related assurance services, such as the audit of the regulatory financial statements, the interim review and providing comfort letters for bond issuances. This work falls within the scope of limited permissible services, which are closely related to existing audit work that KPMG provides. Therefore the proportion of ‘other non-audit services’ to ‘total services’ carried out by the external auditor is considered the most suitable measure of the non-audit services provided. These represented 0.1% of the total fees (FY23: 0.2%).
External auditor effectiveness and quality
Scope
The Committee assesses the effectiveness of the external audit process and the qualifications, expertise, resources, independence and objectivity of the external auditor, including the nature and extent of non-audit services throughout the year, focusing on:
* the quality of the audit and the financial reporting process, including how effective the external auditor is at identifying and addressing matters that could compromise the quality of BT Group’s reporting
* the service of the external auditor and the relationships with the Committee, key members of management and the internal auditor
* whether the external auditor has demonstrated professional scepticism
* whether the external auditor has challenged management’s assumptions where necessary.
Review process
The Committee reviewed the audit scope and plan at the start of the year, and received regular audit reports from the external auditor. This enabled the Committee to assess the quality of audit work. The Committee had the opportunity to interact with the external auditor at meetings as well as to observe the communication and interactions between the external auditor with management and the internal auditor. The Committee reviewed and monitored management’s responsiveness to the external auditor’s requests for information and its findings and recommendations. The Committee Chair also regularly met with the lead audit partner. During the year, a questionnaire was also completed by the Committee members and management to gather their perspectives on the effectiveness and quality of the external auditor’s work.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Committee agreed that:
* the audit contributed to the integrity of the group’s financial reporting
* the relationship between KPMG and both the Committee and management continues to be effective
* KPMG demonstrated an appropriate degree of professional scepticism and deployed a team with the required level of skill and expertise to enable an effective audit
* the audit strategy and plan was appropriately scoped, communicated and executed
* KPMG continues to be independent, and recommended to the Board that the reappointment of KPMG, as our external auditor, be put to our shareholders for approval at the 2024 AGM (this was subsequently approved by the Board).
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 103
Corporate governance report
We have continued to engage with scrutinising the culture and behaviour of BT Group to ensure it remains focused on living up to both the letter and spirit of the Commitments and governance protocol, as well as to ensure consumer fairness principles are considered and reflected in the delivery of key outcomes.# Corporate governance report
Isabel Hudson
Chair of the BT Compliance Committee
15 May 2024
The Committee was responsible for:
– monitoring BT Group’s compliance with the letter and spirit of the Commitments made as part of the 2017 Digital Communications Review (DCR) with Ofcom
– assessing whether Openreach can act with appropriate independence while BT Group is able to fulfil its parent company duties
– overseeing consumer fairness matters and developing internal fair pricing principles on behalf of the Board by monitoring whether BT Group is living up to Ofcom’s Fairness for Customers commitments
– reviewing how BT Group is delivering appropriate outcomes for stakeholders across the Commitments and consumer fairness.
I will be stepping down from the Board in July, after serving for nine years, and this will therefore be my last report as Chair of the Committee. From 1 April 2024, the Committee’s responsibilities transitioned to both the Audit & Risk and Responsible Business Committees. The Audit & Risk Committee is now responsible for overseeing compliance with the Commitments and the Responsible Business Committee’s remit expanded to include consumer fairness. Next year’s Annual Report will provide detail on how this has been achieved in FY25.
During the year, the Committee met five times. The Committee members are all Independent Non-Executive Directors. The Deputy Company Secretary was secretary to the Committee, and he, or his delegate, attended all meetings and provided guidance, advice and support as required. The Chair of the Board, General Counsel, Company Secretary & Director Regulatory Affairs, Commitments Assurance Office Director (CAO), and Openreach’s Commitments Monitoring Office Director also attended meetings as invitees.
| Meetings attended | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Isabel Hudson (Chair) | 5/5 | ||
| Allison Kirkby b | 5/5 | ||
| Ian Cheshire a | 1/1 | ||
| Sara Weller | 5/5 |
a Ian stepped down from the Board and this Committee at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM
b Allison attended all meetings during the year in her role as a Non-Executive Director
I reported to the Board after each meeting on the Committee’s activities and the main issues discussed, with the Board receiving copies of the Committee’s meeting papers and minutes. Ofcom also received copies of the minutes. Details on how we engage with Ofcom can be found on page 45.
The Committee’s monitoring activities focused on:
– the culture of adherence of BT Group’s leadership to the Commitments
– stakeholder perceptions by engagement with industry stakeholders, including CPs, Ofcom and Openreach
– the CAO’s reviews of the annual financial planning, strategy development and commercial pricing and product processes
– targeted reviews of governance for programmes across the group
– the outcomes of CAO compliance reviews, decisions on potential Commitments breaches and, where appropriate, remedial actions.
Breaches continue to remain at a low level
– BT Group and Openreach’s progress on wider DCR outcomes.
The Committee allocated significant time during the year to its consumer fairness remit, including:
– the transition to All IP and the migration of Digital Voice (see page 3)
– encouraging the formation of pricing principles for the EE brand (see page 58)
– year-on-year consumer fairness trends (see page 41) as well as outputs from the group’s consumer fairness panel meetings.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 104
Sara Weller
Chair of the Responsible Business Committee
15 May 2024
This year the Committee has overseen progress on our Manifesto commitments and how they are being accelerated across the business to maintain trust in BT Group.
The Committee is responsible on behalf of the Board for:
– agreeing the responsible business strategy for the group
– overseeing the continuation of our Manifesto including progress against its goals and targets.
The Committee’s key responsibilities are set out in its terms of reference available at bt.com/governance
BT Group has continued to focus on how our actions as a responsible business can most effectively support customers, colleagues and businesses. Throughout the year the Committee has overseen progress on our Manifesto and its delivery across the business, providing guidance and challenge to the plans. In April 2023, the Committee name changed to the Responsible Business Committee to reflect the full breadth of initiatives that are discussed and reported in our Manifesto. With effect from 1 April 2024, in light of the BT Compliance Committee being disbanded, the Committee has responsibility for consumer fairness. This includes monitoring the group’s adherence to the consumer fairness principles. The BT Compliance Committee Chair’s report can be found on page 104.
The Committee members are all Independent Non-Executive Directors. The Deputy Company Secretary is secretary to the Committee and he, or his delegate, attends all meetings and provides guidance, advice and support as required. The Chief Human Resources Officer, Corporate Affairs Director, Sustainability & Corporate Affairs Strategy Director, Chief Inclusion, Equity & Diversity Officer, CEO Consumer, CEO Business and General Counsel, Corporate, Digital & Networks also attend meetings as invitees. During the year, the Committee held four scheduled meetings.
| Meetings attended | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Weller (Chair) | 4/4 | ||
| Steven Guggenheimer | 4/4 | ||
| Maggie Chan Jones | 4/4 | ||
| Isabel Hudson | 4/4 |
I report to the Board after each meeting on the Committee’s activities and the main matters discussed, with the Board receiving copies of the Committee’s meeting papers and minutes. Details on the FY24 Board and Committee evaluation can be found on page 94.
The Committee continued to monitor progress of our Manifesto and priorities under the core pillars: responsible, inclusive and sustainable. More information can be found on pages 34 to 39.
Responsible: new technology must earn trust and transform life for the better. The Committee:
– provided challenge to explore how generative AI can be used to build trust, support growth and reduce risk relating to its adoption
– reviewed the application of BT Group’s responsible tech principles to help protect vulnerable groups such as children
– endorsed BT Group’s human rights policy.
Inclusive: the future of technology must be inclusive and diverse for everyone to benefit. The Committee:
– discussed the importance of attracting and retaining diverse talent, providing input to plans to create a more inclusive culture - aided by the appointment of a Chief Inclusion, Equity & Diversity Officer
– oversaw progress on our digital skills goal and the launch of a new partnership with AbilityNet to reach older and digitally-excluded groups. More information on our digital skills goals can be found on page 35.
Sustainable: technology must accelerate our journey to net zero emissions and a circular world. The Committee:
– reviewed progress on sustainability goals including those forming part of the Restricted Share Plan underpin – see page 109
– oversaw plans to reduce the operational emissions including risks relating to energy and an update from Openreach on electric vehicles
– discussed sustainability plans in Consumer, Business and Openreach, including the shift towards a more circular world
– explored progress on the carbon abatement methodology and how this supports customers to cut carbon emissions, with a challenge to make sure the methodology used was robust and transparent.
The Committee considered the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape and the impact new reporting requirements will have on the group including impacts on resourcing given the increase in the scope and scale of reporting. The Committee oversaw the preparation for these requirements and the opportunity for this to be used to drive greater consistency, accuracy and transparency.
The Committee considered the interests and views of key stakeholders and how these are reflected in the group’s approach to responsible business. The Committee will continue to focus on engaging with stakeholders in the future, especially given changes in the regulatory reporting landscape.
The Committee assessed how environmental risks and human rights due diligence is being managed across the supply chain, including steps taken to positively influence suppliers’ contribution to environmental and social goals.
In the year ahead, in addition to its oversight of our Manifesto, the Committee will focus on:
– integration of, and progress on, the consumer fairness agenda
– progress in responding to new regulatory ESG reporting requirements.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 105
As well as the usual annual decisions, a key task for the Committee this year was handling the change in Chief Executive and ensuring our approach took account of all relevant angles to support the ongoing success of the business. We also remained acutely aware of the cost pressures many of our colleagues face.
Ruth Cairnie
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
15 May 2024
Committee Chair’s letter
Review of the year; Committee decisions; key outturns and plans for the year ahead – pages 106 to 109.
Focus on remuneration
The key aspects of our remuneration structure, outcomes for FY24 and implementation of the shareholder approved Directors’ Remuneration Policy (Policy) in FY25 – pages 110 to 112.
Annual remuneration report
More detail on how we implemented the Policy during FY24 including the single figure table of remuneration for each director – pages 113 to 121.# Remuneration in context
How we take account of remuneration conditions across the group and the environment in which the Committee makes it decisions on executive pay – pages 122 to 124.
The Committee members are all Independent Non-Executive Directors. The Deputy Company Secretary is secretary to the Committee and he, or his delegate, attends all meetings and provides guidance, advice and support as required. The Chairman, Chief Executive, Chief Human Resources Officer, Director of Group Reward and the Executive Remuneration & Policy Director are typically invited to attend meetings. They are not present when their own remuneration is discussed or in other circumstances where their attendance would not be appropriate. Deloitte LLP, as the independent remuneration adviser to the Committee, also attends meetings. The Committee held five scheduled meetings during the year and one ad hoc meeting. After each meeting, I reported back to the Board on the Committee’s activities and the main issues discussed.
| Ruth Cairnie (Chair) | 4/4 |
| Isabel Hudson | 4/5 |
| Ian Cheshire | 2/2 |
| Matthew Key | 5/5 |
| Iain Conn | 2/2 |
The Committee is responsible on behalf of the Board for:
– Determining the salary and benefits for the Chairman, Executive Directors, members of the Executive Committee and the Company Secretary, and monitoring remuneration practices and policies for the wider workforce
– Setting the performance targets for the annual bonus scheme for senior executives for the year ahead
– Determining awards under the annual bonus scheme and the group’s long-term incentive plans for senior executives
– Reviewing and approving the Report on directors’ remuneration
– Reviewing and approving the Policy including seeking shareholder approval, on a binding basis, at least every three years
– Ensuring that all remuneration decisions are made within the parameters of the approved Policy and align with our reward philosophy and our values.
No senior executive is involved in any decision about their own remuneration. The Committee’s key responsibilities are set out in its terms of reference available at bt.com/governance
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
106
Corporate governance report
On behalf of the Committee I’d like to start by thanking Sir Ian Cheshire, the former Committee Chair, for a smooth handover and for securing shareholder support for our Policy at the 2023 Annual General Meeting (AGM). I intend to continue the work of the Committee by supporting our new Chief Executive and the executive team in realising the group’s long term strategic goals. This report sets out information on the Committee’s activities during the year, our remuneration framework and its implementation. I’ve also provided further context on the performance of the business throughout the year and the environment in which the Committee made decisions on executivepay.
As reported last year, we accelerated part of our 2023 pay review and delivered a £1,500 pay rise in January 2023 to support 85% of our UK colleagues (all of those earning a £50,000 full-time equivalent salary or below) during the cost-of-living crisis. This cohort received a further salary increase of at least 2.5% in September 2023, while a 5.5% budget was set for all other colleagues who had received no increase in January. Combined, therefore, all UK colleagues received at least 5.5% in 2023, withour frontline colleagues receiving up to 10% and an averageof 7.2%. Further, as part of the September pay review, we also secured agreement with our unions for the 2024 review, bringing welcome certainty to both colleagues and the business. All UK frontline colleagues received a 4% increase in April 2024, while a 4% budget was available for our UK management population in June2024. Although inflation has fallen in recent months, the Committee understands that our colleagues continue to face cost pressures and it receives regular updates on pay and conditions across the business throughout the year. Isabel Hudson, as the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement, fed back any comments and sentiments on remuneration matters raised by the Colleague Board during the year. Maggie Chan Jones took on this responsibility during the year and the Committee will consult with Maggie to ensure these issues continue to be front-of-mind as it makes decisions on executive pay. In 2022 we voluntarily committed to paying all our UK colleagues at least in line with the Real Living Wage and continue to do so. This year, we expanded our commitment to pay a fair living wage to direct employees in all countries in which we operate, in compliance with the Ethical Trading Initiative’s Base Code #5.1. We’re confident that we meet minimum wage requirements in all countries in which we operate. Almost 85% of our management colleagues are currently paid within or above their competitive market range, and we’ll continue to focus on improving competitive pay positioning as part of our annual pay cycle.
We accentuated our focus this year on our customers during challenging economic times, and achieved particularly strong NPSresults in our Business and Openreach divisions. Customer experience remains a core pillar of our strategy, and a key part ofour annual bonus scorecard for the coming financial year.
Our share price performance over FY24 reflects the continued volatility in the wider market as well as the scale of the long term investment that we’re undertaking. However, we remain confident in our longer term strategy and continue to deliver against it. We again paid dividends in FY24 and believe that we’veappointed the right Chief Executive to realise our vision for BT Group, bringing longer term benefits for our shareholders.
As outlined above, our annual salary review for senior management took place in September rather than June. Simon Lowth received a base salary increase of 5.5% in line with the minimum increase for UK senior management colleagues. As disclosed previously, Philip Jansen waived his right to any increase in his base salary which had been fixed for five years following his appointment.
This year the annual salary review moves back to its usual effective date in June. UK managers are receiving an average 4% increase in salary, with an expected 2% minimum increase granted across the vast majority of our UK management population. There has been a particular focus on data-driven decision making, to target higher increases on those whose pay is less competitive versus market comparators. In line with this approach, Simon will receive a 2% increase in base salary. Allison Kirkby’s salary was set at £1,100,000 on appointment in February. No annual salary increase was awarded for 2024.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
107
Corporate governance report
For FY24, annual bonus performance was based on a scorecard of five key financial and non-financial measures that align to our strategic priorities.
Financial performance accounted for 70% of the bonus scorecard and comprised the following measures:
– Adjusted EBITDA (35%) – despite ongoing macroeconomic challenges, we exceeded our target for the year and delivered £8.1bn in EBITDA.
– Normalised free cash flow (35%) – management of free cash flow was strong in-year, and we delivered NFCF of £1.28bn, above target and our guidance for the year.
Our non-financial measures accounted for 30% of the bonus scorecard and comprised the following measures:
– Customer (20%) – this year saw increased NPS scores, particularly in Business and Openreach. After a disappointing previous year, we made up ground during FY24 in a difficult environment, exceeding target in three of four quarters, and stretch in two of four. Across the full year, performance was between target and stretch.
– Inclusion, equity and diversity (10%):
– Representation in senior management team (5%) – we’ve set ambitious and stretching diverse representation targets across BT Group, and this metric measures progress towards meeting them. Although we made significant progress in disability representation, and some improvement in representation of black and black heritage colleagues, we failed to meet our targets on gender. Overall, therefore, the outcome was between threshold and target for the year.
– Inclusion index (5%) – defined as the average score across four key inclusion questions in our employee engagement surveys, this measure aimed to close the gap in inclusion sentiment for key under-represented groups. Unfortunately, the average gap in inclusion index score across these four groups increased from 4.6% to 5.9%, which did not meet our threshold target.
More information on the actions we are taking on inclusion, equity and diversity can be found on pages 31 to 32. Further detail on the FY24 annual bonus scorecard outcomes can be found on page 114.
The overall formulaic outcome of the bonus scorecard was 129.2% of target. The Committee considered this result in the context of the wider performance of the business, the pace of our transformation to date, and the experience of our shareholders, and exercised its discretion to reduce the bonus payout to 110% oftarget. Philip and Simon will therefore be awarded bonuses of £1,452,000 and £1,044,655 respectively.Half of Simon’s bonus will be deferred into shares for three years.
The Committee has agreed that the current bonus scorecard remains aligned with our strategic priorities for the year, and accordingly no changes are proposed to the measures and weightings, other than minor tweaks in how inclusion and diversity are measured to ensure they remain fit for purpose. The annual bonus plan remains subject to a health and safety underpin and, if triggered, the Committee retains the discretion to reduce the payout as it considers appropriate, including to nil. No changes are proposed to bonus opportunities: on-target and maximum will remain at 120% and 200% of salary for both Allison and Simon, with 50% deferred into shares for a period of three years.
The Committee carried out an assessment of the two underpins applying to the 2021 Restricted Share Plan (RSP) awards (relating to ROCE performance and ESG/reputational damage) and determined that neither were triggered. The Committee also assessed whether there was any evidence of windfall gains at the point of grant or vesting of these awards and concluded there was not. The Committee therefore agreed that the expected vesting value is appropriate. All three tranches of the 2021 RSP awards will therefore vest in full in June 2024, 2025 and 2026 respectively. Tranches one and two remain subject to a holding requirement until June 2026.
The grant of our 2023 RSP awards was delayed from June until September in line with the annual salary review. Simon received an award at the normal Policy opportunity of 200% of salary, whilst Philip did not receive an award in light of him stepping down from the Board. Allison received an award upon appointment in February, granted at the normal opportunity and pro-rated to reflect that she joined part-way through the vesting period. All awards will be subject to both ROCE and sustainability underpins, details of which can be found on page 115. The Committee considered the level of awards, mindful that the share price at the time of award was lower than at the time of the 2022 RSP award. As set out elsewhere in this report, the group is undergoing significant change as the Board-approved plan to transform and grow the business is executed. In order to build the UK’s leading networks and deliver for our customers, significant and ongoing long term investment is required. The Committee considers that the current share price reflects the position of the group in this strategic journey and that future share price increases will be as a result of management taking the right actions and consistently executing our strategy over the next three to five years, rather than as a result of a more general market recovery or windfall gain. The Committee therefore decided not to make any adjustment to the award level, but to review the value of the 2023 RSP awards at the time of vesting and use its discretion to adjust the outcome at that point, should it deem this to be appropriate.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
108
Corporate governance report
Report on directors’ remuneration continued
Both Allison and Simon will be granted an award of 200% of salary in June. As in prior years, these awards will vest in three equal tranches in June 2027, 2028 and 2029, with all tranches subject to a holding requirement until June 2029. RSP awards will be subject to the same two underpins as the 2023 awards, measured over the initial three-year vesting period:
Last July we announced Philip’s intention to step down from the Board once a suitable successor had been identified. He stepped down as Chief Executive on 31 January 2024, and remains an employee of the group until 30 June 2024 during which time he will make himself available to Allison Kirkby on request to ensure an orderly and effective handover. He will continue to receive his contractual salary and benefits until this date. In line with the Policy and the treatment of prior leavers, and in light of the fact that he has retired from executive life, the Committee elected to treat Philip as a good leaver. As a result, he will be eligible to receive a full-year bonus in respect of FY24, which will be paid in full in June 2024. Given his retirement, no deferral will apply, with the full bonus paid in June 2024. Philip did not receive an RSP award in September 2023 as he had already announced his decision to step down. Outstanding shares under the RSP will be preserved, pro-rated for service, and will vest according to their normal schedule (subject to satisfaction of the relevant underpins). Outstanding shares under the Deferred Bonus Plan (DBP) will be retained fully and vest according to their usual timeframe. Philip will also be required to maintain a minimum shareholding equivalent to 500% of his annual salary for two years post cessation of employment.
Allison transitioned from her role as a Non-Executive Director to Chief Executive on 1 February 2024. Allison will receive the same remuneration package as her predecessor, which is within the parameters of the Policy and aligned to the market for comparators of BT Group’s size and complexity. This includes an annual salary of £1,100,000, and on-target bonus opportunity of 120% of salary, with 50% of any bonus deferred into shares for a three-year period. Allison will also receive an annual RSP grant worth 200% of salary, and an award in respect of FY24 was granted in February pro-rated to reflect that she joined part-way through the vesting period. Subject to the satisfaction of the relevant underpins, the RSP awards will vest in three tranches after three to five years and be subject to a holding period until year five. Full details of Allison’s remuneration package can be found in the section outlining the planned implementation of the Policy for FY25 on page 112.
In line with the wider workforce increase and that offered to Simon, the NED base fee will increase from 1 June by 2%, the first increase in two years. For simplicity, the fee payable for membership of the Nominations Committee (which all NEDs receive) has been consolidated into the base fee. As Chairman, Adam Crozier waived his right to receive any increase. Noting the changes to the structure and responsibility of our Board Committees that have been made this year, a full review of our Committee and additional responsibility fees was undertaken, to ensure they remain appropriate and market-competitive. These fees have not been increased since 2019, and accordingly the following was agreed:
As always, the Committee and I wish to maintain an open dialogue on remuneration matters with our investors and I would welcome their comments or feedback, and support, at the forthcoming AGM.
Ruth Cairnie
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
15 May 2024
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
109
Corporate governance report
a ROCE is defined on page 48.
Our remuneration principles are to maintain a competitive remuneration package that promotes the long term success of the business, avoids excessive or inappropriate risk-taking and aligns management’s interests with those of shareholders. Below is how remuneration is aligned with the principles of the Code.
Simplicity – We operate a simple but effective remuneration framework which is applied on a consistent basis for all colleagues – The annual bonus rewards performance against key performance indicators, while the RSP provides long term sustainable alignment with our shareholders – There is clear line of sight for management and shareholders. Alignment to culture – When considering performance, the Remuneration Committee takes account of BT Group’s values – The Remuneration Committee receives regular updates on remuneration practices and policies for the wider workforce, and colleagues may provide feedback to the Board via the Colleague Board and the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement – Colleagues are encouraged to become shareholders in the business through the operation of all-employee share plans.
| £000 | FY24 | FY23 | FY24 | FY23 | FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Kirkby | ||||||
| Chief Executive | a | |||||
| Philip Jansen | ||||||
| Former Chief Executive | ||||||
| Simon Lowth | ||||||
| Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
| Base salary | 288 | n/a | 917 | 1,100 | 774 | 748 |
| Pension allowance | 18 | n/a | 92 | 110 | 77 | 75 |
| Benefits | 35 | n/a | 107 | 113 | 24 | 23 |
| Total fixed pay | 341 | n/a | 1,116 | 1,323 | 875 | 846 |
| Annual bonus (shares) b | n/a | n/a | n/a | 481 | 522 | 328 |
| Annual bonus (cash) | n/a | n/a | 1,452 | 481 | 522 | 328 |
| RSP (shares) c | n/a | n/a | 1,151 | 670 | 770 | 448 |
| Total variable pay d | 0 | n/a | 2,603 | 1,633 | 1,815 | 1,104 |
| Total | 341 | n/a | 3,719 | 2,956 | 2,690 | 1,950 |
a Allison was appointed as Chief Executive from 1 February 2024. The FY24 base salary figure reflects Allison’s total remuneration for the year representing £105,000 received as an Independent Non-Executive Director and £183,000 received as Chief Executive. Allison was not eligible for a bonus in FY24 and her first RSP award was granted in February 2024.
b In line with the Policy, 50% of the annual bonus is deferred into shares for three years. Philip’s FY24 bonus will be paid fully in cash, with no deferral into shares.
c Both underpins have been satisfied for the 2021 RSP award and therefore all three tranches of the 2021 RSP award will vest in full in June 2024, 2025 and 2026 respectively. In addition, the second tranche of the 2020 RSP will vest in August 2024. Further detail is set out on page 114.
d The total variable pay for FY23 for Philip and FY24 for Simon do not balance due to roundings.
– The bonus was subject to five measures of financial and non-financial performance.
– Both financial metrics and NPS were above target for the year.
– Our SMT representation metric finished the year below target while our inclusion index result missed threshold.
– This resulted in a formulaic outcome of 129.2% of target. However, the Committee exercised its discretion to reduce the overall scorecard payout to 110% of target.
– In line with the Policy, 50% of Simon’s annual bonus will be deferred into shares for three years.
| Measure and weighting (%) | Payout (% of max) |
|---|---|
| Adjusted EBITDA (35%) | 80% |
| Normalised free cash flow (35%) | 92% |
| Group Net Promoter Score (NPS) (20%) | 73% |
| SMT representation (5%) | 53% |
| Inclusion index (5%) | 0% |
– A conditional share award subject to two underpins over the initial three-year vesting period.
– The Committee assessed the two underpins at the end of the restricted period and confirmed that both had been satisfied.
– Accordingly, all three tranches of the 2021 RSP award will vest in full in June 2024, 2025 and 2026 respectively. Tranches one and two are subject to a holding period until June 2026. Further detail is set out on page 114.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 111
| Fixed pay | Annual bonus | RSP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Kirkby | Salary – £1,100,000 Benefits Pension allowance – 10% of salary | Maximum opportunity – 200% of salary Target opportunity – 120% of salary 2024 award – 200% of salary Performance measures n/a | – Adjusted EBITDA (35%) – Normalised free cash flow (35%) – NPS (20%) – Diversity and inclusion (10%). An underpin applies which allows the Committee to exercise its discretion to reduce the scorecard result if there is a significant breach in health and safety. |
| Simon Lowth | Salary – £791,405 Benefits Pension allowance – 10% of salary | Maximum opportunity – 200% of salary Target opportunity – 120% of salary 2024 award – 200% of salary | Awards subject to two underpins over the initial three-year vesting period: – Average ROCE must be at least 7% – Sufficient progress is made towards meeting our sustainability commitments. Framework n/a |
| – 50% of any bonus payment for FY25 will be deferred into shares for three years – Malus and clawback provisions apply – Full Committee discretion available. | – Awards vest in three equal tranches after three, four and five years; no shares can be sold until year five – Malus and clawback provisions apply – Full Committee discretion available. |
The Policy as approved by shareholders at the AGM on 13 July 2023 in accordance with section 439A of the Companies Act 2006 can be found online at bt.com/annualreport
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 112
This section summarises all elements of the directors’ remuneration in FY24. References to ‘audited’ refer to an audit performed in accordance with UK statutory reporting requirements.
The following table sets out all emoluments received by directors for FY24 and FY23.
| Fixed pay | Total fixed pay | Variable pay | Total variable pay | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic salary andfees £000 | Benefits a £000 | Pension b £000 | £000 | Annual bonus c £000 | Long term incentives £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| FY24 | FY23 | FY24 | FY23 | FY24 | FY23 | FY24 | FY23 | |
| Chairman | ||||||||
| Adam Crozier | 700 | 700 | 11 | 12 | 711 | 712 | ||
| Executive Directors | ||||||||
| Allison Kirkby f,i | 288 | 125 | 35 | 8 | 18 | 341 | 133 | |
| Simon Lowth | 774 | 748 | 24 | 23 | 77 | 75 | 875 | 846 |
| Non-Executive directors | ||||||||
| Ruth Cairnie g | 161 | 161 | 161 | 161 | 161 | |||
| Maggie Chan Jones h,i | 99 | 8 | 35 | 134 | 8 | |||
| Steven Guggenheimer h,i | 97 | 48 | 36 | 15 | 133 | 63 | ||
| Isabel Hudson i | 147 | 146 | 2 | 1 | 149 | 147 | ||
| Matthew Key i | 163 | 150 | 2 | 1 | 165 | 151 | ||
| Raphael Kűbler j | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Sara Weller i | 140 | 138 | 140 | 138 | ||||
| Sub-total | 2,569 | 2,063 | 145 | 60 | 95 | 75 | 2,809 | 2,198 |
| Directors who left during the year | ||||||||
| Philip Jansen k | 917 | 1,100 | 107 | 113 | 92 | 110 | 1,116 | 1,323 |
| Adel Al-Saleh l | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Ian Cheshire m | 44 | 155 | 44 | 155 | ||||
| Iain Conn m | 47 | 163 | 47 | 163 | ||||
| Total | 3,577 | 3,481 | 252 | 173 | 187 | 185 | 4,016 | 3,839 |
a Benefits are provided in line with the Policy. For Allison, the figure includes one-off relocation costs to the value of £25,000. For Philip, the figure includes a company provided car and personal driver to the value of c. £79,000 (FY23: £86,000).
b Pension allowance paid in cash for the financial year – see ‘Pension allowance’ on page 114.
c Annual bonus shown includes both the cash and deferred share element for Simon. The deferred element of the FY24 bonus includes the value of deferred shares to be granted in June 2024. Further details of the deferred element are set on page 122. Allison will not receive a bonus in respect of FY24. Philip’s FY24 bonus will be paid fully in cash, with no deferral into shares.
d Value shown represents the estimated value of the second tranche of the RSP awards granted in 2020 and the first tranche of the RSP awards granted in 2021, that will vest in August and June 2024 respectively. The estimated value is based on a three-month average share price from 1 January 2024 to 31 March 2024 of 110.46p. Further details are provided on page 118. For the 2021 award, none of the value was attributable to share price appreciation over the vesting period. The Committee did not exercise any discretion in relation to the vesting of the awards or share price change.
e The first tranche of the 2020 RSP vested in August 2023. The 2020 RSP value reported last year (£803,000 for Philip and £537,000 for Simon) was calculated on an estimated basis using the three-month average share price from 1 January 2023 to 31 March 2023 of 135.88p. The figures have been restated to reflect the actual share price on vesting of 113.43p. Further details are provided on page 118.
f Allison was appointed as a Director in March 2019 and became Chief Executive on 1 February 2024. The figure reflects Allison’s total remuneration for the year representing £105,000 received as an Independent Non-Executive Director and £183,000 received as Chief Executive.
g Ruth was appointed as a Director on 6 April 2023 and the figure represents her pro-rated remuneration during the year.
h Includes an additional fee for regular intercontinental travel to attend Board and Board Committee meetings in line with the Policy.
i Value shown relates to reimbursement of reasonable travelling and other expenses (including any relevant tax) incurred in carrying out their duties.
j Raphael was appointed as a Director on 30 January 2024. Under the terms of the Relationship Agreement between BT Group and Deutsche Telekom and Raphael’s letter of appointment, no remuneration is payable for this position.
k Philip stepped down as a Director and Chief Executive on 31 January 2024 and the figure represents his pro-rated remuneration during the year.
l Adel stepped down as a Director on 31 December 2023. Under the terms of the Relationship Agreement between BT Group and Deutsche Telekom and Adel’s letter of appointment, no remuneration is payable for this position.
m Ian and Iain stepped down as Directors at the conclusion of the AGM on13 July 2023 and the figure represents their pro-rated remuneration during the year.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 113
Salaries and fees
Executive Directors’ salaries are reviewed annually, with any increases typically effective from 1 June. A 5.5% increase to Simon Lowth’s salary was agreed from 1 September 2023 in line with increases for our UK senior management team, bringing Simon’s salary to £791,405. Philip’s salary of £1,100,000 was fixed for five years at the time of his appointment in January 2019. Allison was appointed as Chief Executive on 1 January 2024 and the Committee agreed a salary of £1,100,000. Adam’s annual fee has been £700,000 since his appointment as Chairman on 1 December 2021. His fee has remained at this level throughout the year as the Chairman volunteered to waive any fee increase during FY24. The fees for Non-Executive Directors reflect Committee-related or other additional responsibilities, including on a pro-rated basis for any appointments during the year. A full breakdown of Non-Executive Director fees is set out on page 119.
Pension allowance
Executive Directors receive an annual cash allowance, which can be put towards the provision of retirement benefits. All Executive Directors received an annual allowance of 10% of salary. This is aligned with the contribution rate available to the majority of our UK employees. We also provide death in service cover consisting of a lump sum equal to four times salary, and for Simon Lowth only, a dependants’ pension equal to 30% of his capped salary.
Annual bonus
Philip and Simon were eligible for an on-target bonus in respect of FY24 of 120% of salary with a maximum opportunity of 200% of salary. Having joined as Chief Executive on 1 February 2024 and in accordance with the bonus plan rules, Allison was not entitled to a bonus for FY24. The annual bonus is based on performance against a scorecard of five key financial and non-financial measures linked to our KPIs as set out on pages 48 to 49.
| Category | Measure | Weighting | Threshold | Target | Stretch | Actual | Payout (% of max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial | Adjusted EBITDA (£m) | 35% | 7,959 | 8,075 | 8,191 | 8,100 | 80% |
| Normalised free cash flow (£m) | 35% | 1,072 | 1,188 | 1,304 | 1,280 | 92% | |
| Transformation scorecard | Group NPS | 20% | 0 | 100 | 200 | 132 | 73% |
| SMT representation (%) | 5% | 76.9 | 84.6 | 92.3 | 82.8 | 53% | |
| Inclusion index | 5% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 1.1% | 6.0% | 0% |
Formulaic outcome 77.3% of max (129.2% of target)
For scorecard purposes, the EBITDA result assumes an on-target bonus payout for all colleagues. Actual post-bonus EBITDA for FY24 is £8,100m. When determining the overall performance and bonus pay-outs, the Committee also considers a number of other factors including the wider performance of the business, share price performance, the external environment and overall affordability. Despite the formulaic outcome of the final bonus scorecard being 129.2% of target, the Committee exercised its discretion to reduce the outcome to 110% of target. The Committee believes this is a fair reflection of the overall performance of the business. The final bonus outturns for Philip and Simon are set out in the table below:
| Formulaic outcome | Following discretion | % of max | Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip Jansen | 129.2% of target | 110% of target | 65.9% | £1,452,000 |
| Simon Lowth | 129.2% of target | 110% of target | 65.9% | £1,044,655 |
2021 RSP
The RSP is a conditional share award. Two underpins applied over the initial three-year vesting period:
The Committee assessed performance against the two underpins at the end of the financial year and agreed that both had been satisfied. As a result, all three tranches of the 2021 RSP award will vest in full in June 2024, 2025 and 2026 respectively. Tranches one and two remain subject to a holding requirement until June 2026.
2023 RSP
The 2023 RSP awards were made in September 2023 as set out below and on page 118. An RSP award was made to Simon Lowth in line with the normal Policy level. Despite serving as Chief Executive for almost a year of the performance period, no award was made to Philip Jansen on the basis of him stepping down as Chief Executive at the end of January 2024. To reflect her joining part-way through the initial three-year vesting period, a pro-rated award was made to Allison Kirkby.
| Director | Date of award | RSP award (shares) | Grant price a | % of salary | Face value of award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Kirkby | 8 February 2024 | 1,484,942 | 107.00p | 144 | £1,588,889 |
| Simon Lowth | 7 September 2023 | 1,388,429 | 114.00p | 200 | £1,582,809 |
a The grant price is calculated using the average middle-market price of a BT Group plc share for the three dealing days prior to grant.
These awards are conditional share awards. Two underpins apply over the initial three-year vesting period:
Should one or both underpins not be met, the Committee may at its discretion reduce the number of shares vesting, including to nil. Awards will vest in three equal tranches after three, four and five years, with an additional holding period such that no shares may be sold until year five. At vesting, additional shares representing the value of reinvested dividends on the underlying shares are added. Malus and clawback provisions apply as set out in the Policy, and the Committee retains the ultimate discretion to adjust vesting levels to ensure alignment with our overall performance. Details of all interests under the RSP are set out on page 118.
2023 deferred shares
In line with the Policy, 50% of the bonus awarded for FY23 was deferred into shares. The awards were made under the deferred bonus plan (DBP) in June 2023 as set out below and on page 118.
| Director | Date of award | DBP award (shares) | Grant price a | Face value of award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip Jansen | 15 June 2023 | 343,782 | 140.00p | £481,294 |
| Simon Lowth | 15 June 2023 | 234,442 | 140.00p | £328,218 |
a The grant price is calculated using the average middle-market price of a BT Group plc share for the three dealing days prior to grant.
Deferred shares are not subject to performance conditions and have a three-year vesting period. At vesting, additional shares representing the value of reinvested dividends on the underlying shares are added. Malus and clawback provisions apply as set out in the Policy, and the Committee retains the ultimate discretion to adjust vesting levels to ensure alignment with our overall performance. Details of all interests under the DBP are set out on page 118.
Allison transitioned from her role as a Non-Executive Director to Chief Executive on 1 February 2024. Allison will receive the same remuneration package as her predecessor, which is within the parameters of the Policy and aligned to the market for comparators of BT Group’s size and complexity. This includes an annual salary of £1,100,000, and on-target bonus opportunity of 120% of salary, with 50% of any bonus deferred into shares for a three-years. Allison was not eligible to receive a bonus in respect of FY24. Allison’s RSP opportunity under the Policy will be 200% of salary. As outlined above, Allison was granted an RSP award in respect of FY24 in February 2024 pro-rated to reflect that she joined part-way through the initial three-year vesting period. Subject to the satisfaction of relevant underpins, RSP awards will vest in three equal tranches after three, four and five years and be subject to a further two-year holding period. Allison will be subject to our shareholding requirement, being expected to build up a shareholding of 500% of salary within five years of the date of her appointment. This requirement continues to apply for two years post-cessation.
Philip Jansen stood down as a director on 31 January 2024 but remains an employee of the group until 30 June 2024 continuing to support an orderly and effective handover to Allison Kirkby as required. Under the terms of his service contract, he will continue to receive his salary and contractual benefits until the end of his notice period, being 30 June 2024. These payments will total £458,333 basic salary and fees, £8,888 benefits and £45,883 pension allowance. For FY24 this amounts to £183,333 basic salary and fees, £3,555 benefits and £18,333 pension allowance. For FY25 this amounts to £275,000 basic salary and fees, £5,333 benefits and £27,500 pension allowance. Philip will receive no compensation or payment for the termination of his service contract or his ceasing to be a director of BT Group or any other group company, although BT Group will pay independent adviser fees of £45,000 (paid directly to the adviser) and £100 for reconfirmation of customary post-employment restrictions on working for competitors. In line with the Policy and the treatment of prior leavers, and in light of the fact that he has retired from executive life, the Committee elected to treat Philip as a good leaver. As a result, he will be eligible to receive a full-year bonus in respect of FY24, which will be paid in full in June 2024. Philip will not be eligible for an annual bonus in FY25. Philip did not receive an RSP award in September 2023 as he had already announced his decision to step down. Outstanding shares under the RSP will be preserved, pro-rated for service, and will vest according to their normal schedule (subject to satisfaction of the relevant underpins).# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 116
The Committee believes that the interests of the Executive Directors should be closely aligned with those of shareholders. The aim is to encourage the build-up of a meaningful shareholding in BT Group plc over time by retaining net shares received through the executive share plans or from market purchases. The shareholding requirement for Executive Directors under the Policy is 500% of salary. Executive Directors are expected to meet this requirement within five years of the approval of the Policy or, in the case of any new Executive Directors appointed, within five years of their date of appointment. The shareholding requirement continues to apply in full for two years post-cessation of employment (or the total number of shares held at cessation, if lower). The post-cessation shareholding requirement will be calculated and expressed as a fixed number of shares by reference to the closing BT Group plc share price on the day immediately prior to the cessation date. The requirement is fixed as this number of shares for a period of two years and compliance will be measured at cessation and annually thereafter. In enforcing continued compliance post-cessation, the Committee may request that the Executive Director transfers any shares subject to the shareholding requirement to be held in trust until they no longer need to be retained.
We encourage the Chairman and Independent Non-Executive Directors to purchase, on a voluntary basis, BT Group plc shares with an aggregate value of £5,000 on average each year (based on acquisition price) to further align the interests of Non-Executive Directors with those of our shareholders. They are asked to hold these shares until they cease being a member of the Board. This does not apply to the Deutsche Telekom nominated representative director appointed to the Board as a Non-Independent, Non- Executive Director under the terms of the EE acquisition in January 2016. This helps avoid any conflict of interest.
The following tables show the beneficial interests in BT Group plc shares of directors and persons closely associated as at 31 March 2024 (or at the point of leaving for directors who left during the year). The first table includes interests held by the Executive Directors under BT Group plc’s share plans. The numbers represent the maximum possible vesting levels. Full details of all DBP and RSP awards, including restricted periods and vesting conditions, are set out on page 118. For Executive Directors we use the average BT Group plc share price over the preceding 12 months (or the share price at acquisition/ vesting date if higher) to determine whether the minimum shareholding requirement has been reached.
During the period 1 April 2024 to 15 May 2024, there were no movements in directors’ beneficial holdings or other interests in shares. The directors, as a group, beneficially own less than 1% of BT Group plc’s shares.
| Executive Directors | Number of shares owned outright at 31 March 2024 | RSP and DBP a | Options b | Shareholding requirement (% of salary) | Current shareholding (% of salary) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Kirkby | 525,000 | 787,019 | 0 | 500% | 161% |
| Simon Lowth | 1,186,387 | 2,695,526 | 11,222 | 500% | 728% |
a Subject to continued employment and, for the RSP, two underpins over the initial three-year vesting period.
b Includes interests in saveshare, a HMRC-approved all-employee plan and yourshare, a HMRC-approved share incentive plan.
| Beneficial holding owned outright at 1 April 2023 | Beneficial holding owned outright at 31 March 2024 | Chairman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62,500 | 62,500 | Adam Crozier | |
| Non-Executive Directors | |||
| n/a | 25,000 | Ruth Cairnie a | |
| 0 | 70,000 | Maggie Chan Jones | |
| 0 | 4,700 | Steven Guggenheimer | |
| 24,090 | 24,090 | Isabel Hudson | |
| 161,686 | 209,586 | Matthew Key | |
| 0 | 0 | Raphael Kübler b | |
| 37,000 | 47,000 | Sara Weller | |
| Directors who left during the year | |||
| 6,412,792 | 7,366,259 | Philip Jansen c | |
| 0 | 0 | Adel Al-Saleh d | |
| 19,646 | 19,646 | Ian Cheshire e | |
| 69,442 | 69,442 | Iain Conn e | |
| 6,787,156 | 7,898,223 | Total |
a Ruth was appointed as a Director on 6 April 2023.
b Raphael was appointed as a Director on 30 January 2024.
c Philip stepped down as a Director and Chief Executive on 31 January 2024 and the number reflects his holding at that date.
d Adel stepped down as a Director on 31 December 2023 and the number reflects his holding at that date.
e Ian and Iain stepped down as Directors at the conclusion of the AGM on 13 July 2023 and the number reflects their holding at that date.
| 1 April 2023 | Awarded/ granted | Dividends reinvested | Vested | Lapsed | Total number of award shares at 31 March 2024 | Vesting date | Price at grant | Market price at date of vesting | Market price at date of exercise | Monetary value of vested award £000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # Corporate governance report |
In line with the Policy, 50% of any bonus payable will be deferred into shares for three years. The Committee has reviewed in full the measures, weightings and targets used in the annual bonus scorecard. The FY25 annual bonus structure measures and weightings are set out below.
| Category | Measure | Weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Financial | Adjusted EBITDA | 35% |
| Normalised free cash flow | 35% | |
| Transformation | scorecard NPS | 20% |
| Inclusion & diversity | 10% |
All of the annual bonus measures are linked to our KPIs as set out on pages 48 to 49. In addition to the annual bonus scorecard, a health and safety underpin applies which allows the Committee to exercise its discretion to reduce the annual bonus payout result if there is a significant breach in health and safety. We do not publish details of the targets in advance as these are commercially confidential. Targets will be disclosed in full in the 2025 Report on directors’ remuneration.
Both Executive Directors will be granted an award under the RSP in June 2024 to the value of 200% of salary. When considering the grant levels each year, the Committee takes in account of the share price performance over the preceding year. Following review, the Committee has agreed that awards will be granted to both Executive Directors this year at the normal Policy level of 200% of salary. The Committee has agreed the same two underpins will apply for the 2024 RSP awards which will be measured over the initial three- year vesting period:
Awards will vest in three equal tranches after three, four and five years, with an additional holding period such that no shares may be sold until year five. At vesting, additional shares representing the value of reinvested dividends on the underlying shares are added. Malus and clawback provisions and overarching Committee discretion applies, as set out in the Policy.
The fees for Non-Executive Directors were reviewed in the year by the Chairman and Executive Directors, taking into consideration the role and requirements of BT Group, together with the fees paid to non-executive directors at companies of a similar size and complexity. Following the review it was agreed to increase the base fee by 2% in line with the minimum expected budget for our UK management colleagues. It was also agreed to consolidate the Nominations Committee member’s fee (£10,000) into the base fee. This means the base fee will increase from £78,540 to £90,000 a year effective from 1 June 2024.
The Chairman receives a single all-inclusive fee for his role. No increase has been awarded for FY25 and this will remain at £700,000. Other changes agreed as part of the review were:
The table below sets out the additional fees for membership and chairing a Board Committee and reflects the changes agreed during the year.
| Committee | Chair’s fee | Member’s fee |
|---|---|---|
| Audit & Risk | £35,000 | £25,000 |
| National Security & Investigatory Powers | n/a | £8,000 |
| Remuneration | £30,000 | £15,000 |
| Responsible Business | £25,000 | £15,000 |
a Where the Chairman or Chief Executive acts as Chair of a Board Committee, no additional Committee Chair fee is payable.
Other fees payable include:
No element of Non-Executive Director remuneration is performance-related. Neither the Chairman nor the Non- Executive Directors participate in our bonus or employee share plans and nor are they members of any of the group pension schemes.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 119
Corporate governance report
¹ ROCE is defined on page 48.
During the year, the Committee received independent advice on executive remuneration matters from Deloitte LLP. The Committee is satisfied that the advice provided by Deloitte has been objective and independent. The Deloitte partner who provides remuneration advice to the Committee does not have any connections with BT Group plc that may impact their independence. Deloitte received £75,800 (excluding VAT) in fees for these services. The fees are charged on a time-spent basis in delivering advice. That advice materially assisted the Committee in its consideration of matters relating to executive remuneration and the Policy. Deloitte is a founder member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and as such, voluntarily operates under the code of conduct in relation to executive remuneration consulting in the UK. In addition, during FY24, Deloitte provided the group with advice on corporate and indirect taxes, assistance with regulatory, risk and compliance issues, accounting advice, and additional consultancy services.
We use both treasury shares and shares purchased by the BT Group Employee Share Ownership Trust (the Trust) to satisfy our all-employee share plans and executive share plans. Shares held in the Trust do not have any voting rights. As at 31 March 2024, shares equivalent to 2.31% (FY23: 3.03%) of the issued share capital (excluding treasury shares) would be required to satisfy all outstanding share options and awards. Of these, we estimate that for FY25, shares equivalent to approximately 0.27% (FY23: 0.87%) of the issued share capital (excluding treasury shares) will be required to satisfy the all- employee share plans.
The table below sets out the previous votes cast at the AGM in respect of the Annual remuneration report and the Policy.
| Report on directors’ remuneration at the 13 July 2023 AGM | For % of votes cast/ Number | Against % of votes cast/ Number | Withheld votes/ Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| 98.15 | 1.85 | ||
| 6,801,425,259 | 128,049,792 | 1,580,860 | |
| Policy at the 13 July 2023 AGM | For % of votes cast/ Number | Against % of votes cast/ Number | Withheld votes/ Number |
| 98.17 | 1.83 | ||
| 6,798,003,577 | 126,721,663 | 6,331,473 |
Withheld votes are not counted when calculating voting outcomes.
Details on the FY24 Board and Committee evaluation can be found on page 94.
TSR is the measure of the returns that a company has provided for its shareholders, reflecting share price movements and assuming reinvestment of dividends. The graph below illustrates the performance of BT Group plc measured by TSR relative to a broad equity market index over the past ten years. We consider the FTSE 100 to be the most appropriate index against which to measure performance, as BT Group plc has been a member of the FTSE 100 throughout the ten-year period.
BT Group plc’s TSR performance vs the FTSE 100
Source: Datastream
| Year end | Chief Executive | Total remuneration £000 | Annual bonus (% of max) | ISP/RSP vesting (% of max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Allison Kirkby a | 341 | n/a | n/a |
| Philip Jansen b | 3,719 | 65.9% | 100% | |
| 2023 | Philip Jansen | 3,089 | 43.7% | 100% |
| 2022 | Philip Jansen | 3,460 | 60% | 19.1% |
| 2021 | Philip Jansen | 2,628 | 60% | 0% |
| 2020 | Philip Jansen | 3,248 | 50% | n/a |
| 2019 | Philip Jansen | 725 | 56% | n/a |
| Gavin Patterson c | 1,719 | 28% | 0% | |
| 2018 | Gavin Patterson | 2,307 | 54% | 0% |
| 2017 | Gavin Patterson | 1,345 | 0% | 0% |
| 2016 | Gavin Patterson | 5,396 | 45% | 82.0% |
| 2015 | Gavin Patterson | 4,562 | 58% | 67.4% |
a Allison was appointed as a Director on 15 March 2019 and became Chief Executive from 1 February 2024. Her first RSP award was granted in February 2024.
b Philip was appointed as a Director on 1 January 2019 and became Chief Executive from 1 February 2019. His first ISP award was granted in February 2019. Philip stood down as Chief Executive on 31 January 2024.
c Gavin stood down as Chief Executive on 31 January 2019 .
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 120
Corporate governance report
The following table sets out the dates on which directors’ service agreements/initial letters of appointment commenced and termination provisions:
| Executive Directors | Commencement date | Termination provisions |
|---|---|---|
| Allison Kirkby | 1 February 2024 | Directors’ service agreements do not contain fixed term periods and are terminable by BT Group plc on 12 months’ notice and by the director on six months’ notice. |
| Simon Lowth | 4 July 2016 | |
| Chairman and Independent Non-Executive Directors | Commencement date | Termination provisions |
| Adam Crozier | 1 November 2021 | The letter of appointment does not contain a fixed term period and is terminable by BT Group plc on 12 months’ notice and by the director on six months’ notice. |
| Ruth Cairnie | 6 April 2023 | Letters of appointment do not contain fixed term periods and are terminable by either party on three months’ written notice. |
| Maggie Chan Jones | 1 March 2023 | |
| Steven Guggenheimer | 1 October 2022 | |
| Isabel Hudson | 1 November 2014 | |
| Matthew Key | 25 October 2018 | |
| Sara Weller | 16 July 2020 | |
| Non-Independent, Non-Executive Director | Commencement date | Termination provisions |
| Raphael Kübler | 30 January 2024 | Appointed as a Non-Independent, Non-Executive Director under the terms of the Relationship Agreement between BT Group plc and Deutsche Telekom. The appointment is terminable immediately by either party. |
As announced on 7 May 2024, Tushar Morzaria joined the Board as an Independent Non-Executive Director with immediate effect. In addition, Isabel Hudson will step down from the Board at the conclusion of the AGM on 11 July 2024. There are no other service agreements, letters of appointment or material contracts, existing or proposed, between BT Group plc and any of the directors.There are no arrangements or understandings between any director or executive officer and any other person pursuant to which any director or executive officer was selected to serve. There are no family relationships between the directors.
Each Independent Non-Executive Director has an appointment letter setting out the terms of his or her appointment. We ask each Non- Executive Director to allow a minimum commitment of 22 days each year, subject to Committee responsibilities, and to allow slightly more in the first year in order to take part in the induction programme. The actual time commitment required in any year may vary depending on business and additional time may be required during periods of increased activity. The service agreements and letters of appointment are available for inspection by shareholders at BT Group plc’s registered office.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 121
Our colleagues are vital to our business and we believe in fairness throughout the group. There are several general reward principles which we apply at all levels:
The Committee supports fairness and transparency of remuneration arrangements and the Policy has been designed to align with the remuneration philosophy and principles that underpin remuneration across the wider group. To support this, the Committee receives regular updates on HR policies and reward practices for the wider workforce as well as updates on employee relations. Whilst the Committee does not directly consult with our employees as part of the process of determining executive pay, the Board does receive feedback from employee surveys that take into account remuneration throughout the organisation. The Designated Non- Executive Director for Workforce Engagement also updates the Committee on sentiments being raised by our colleagues in relation to the remuneration of our workforce and related decisions, as raised by the Colleague Board through their ‘hot topics’ discussions. When setting Executive Directors’ remuneration, the Committee considers the remuneration of other senior managers and colleagues in the group more generally to ensure that arrangements for Executive Directors are appropriate in this context. When determining salary increases for Executive Directors, the Committee considers the outcome of the wider pay review for the group.
The table below sets out the Chief Executive pay ratios as at 31 March 2024, as well as those reported in respect of the prior five years. This report will build up over time to show a rolling ten-year period. The ratios compare the single total figure of remuneration of the Chief Executive with the equivalent figures for the UK lower quartile (P25), median (P50) and upper quartile (P75) employees. A significant proportion of the Chief Executive’s remuneration is delivered through long term incentives, where awards are linked to share price movements over the longer term. This means that the ratios will depend significantly on long term incentive outcomes and may fluctuate from year to year, for example, the highest ratio was exhibited in 2024 due to an above-target bonus payout, and the vesting of two separate tranches of RSP awards to Philip Jansen. We believe that these ratios are appropriate given the size and complexity of the business, and are a fair reflection of our remuneration principles and practices. We have used the ‘Option B’ methodology (based on gender pay reporting), as the most robust way to identify the individual reference points within an organisation with multiple operating segments.
| Total remuneration | Employee remuneration | Pay ratio | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive | P25 | P50 | P75 | P25 | P50 | P75 | |||||
| 2019 | £2,444,000 | £34,281 | £41,477 | £51,594 | 71:1 | 59:1 | 47:1 | ||||
| 2020 | £3,248,000 | £34,881 | £42,173 | £51,351 | 93:1 | 77:1 | 63:1 | ||||
| 2021 | £2,628,000 | £35,569 | £41,600 | £50,391 | 74:1 | 63:1 | 52:1 | ||||
| 2022 | £3,350,000 | £35,722 | £40,059 | £49,488 | 94:1 | 84:1 | 68:1 | ||||
| 2023 | £2,956,000 | £36,960 | £40,095 | £50,999 | 80:1 | 74:1 | 58:1 | ||||
| 2024 | £3,953,000 | £35,794 | £37,617 | £53,691 | 110:1 | 105:1 | 74:1 |
| Base salary | Employee remuneration | Pay ratio | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive | P25 | P50 | P75 | P25 | P50 | P75 | |||||
| 2019 | £1,222,000 | £30,090 | £35,918 | £41,740 | 37:1 | 31:1 | 27:1 | ||||
| 2020 | £1,100,000 | £31,144 | £37,321 | £42,800 | 35:1 | 29:1 | 26:1 | ||||
| 2021 | £1,100,000 | £31,842 | £35,606 | £42,836 | 35:1 | 31:1 | 26:1 | ||||
| 2022 | £1,100,000 | £31,637 | £35,017 | £43,908 | 35:1 | 31:1 | 25:1 | ||||
| 2023 | £1,100,000 | £33,144 | £35,948 | £44,986 | 33:1 | 31:1 | 24:1 | ||||
| 2024 | £1,100,000 | £31,973 | £34,100 | £45,948 | 34:1 | 32:1 | 24:1 |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 122
The total FTE remuneration paid during the year in question for each employee in each of the groups was then calculated, on the same basis as the information set out in the ‘single figure’ table for the Chief Executive. Bonus payments in respect of each year have been determined based on the latest available information at the time of analysis. The median total remuneration figure for each group was then used to determine the three ratios.
BT Group plc, our parent company, employs our Chairman, Executive and Non-Executive Directors only, and as such no meaningful comparison can be drawn based on the parent company alone, as is required by the reporting regulations. Instead, we have chosen to present a comparison with our UK management and technical employee population, comprising around 23,000 colleagues. We believe this is the most meaningful comparison given the nature of our workforce, as this group has similar performance-related pay arrangements as our Executive Directors. This is also consistent with prior year disclosures. The salary/fee levels set out in the table below are in accordance with the Policy. Any increase in fees paid to the Non-Executive Directors reflects both the annual fee review as well as any changes in role including additional Committee responsibilities.
| FY24 (% change) | FY23 (% change) | FY22 (% change) | FY21 (% change) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary/ fees | Benefits | Annual bonus | Salary/ fees | Benefits | Annual bonus | Salary/ fees | Benefits | |
| Chairman Adam Crozier | 0% | (8%) | – | 0% | 1,100% | – | – | – |
| Executive Directors | ||||||||
| Allison Kirkby a | 130% | 338% | – | 1% | 100% | – | 0% | 6% |
| Philip Jansen b | 0% | (5)% | 51% | 0% | 13% | (27)% | 0% | 2% |
| Simon Lowth | 3% | 4% | 59% | 2% | 5% | (26)% | 0% | (4)% |
| Non-Executive Directors | ||||||||
| Adel Al-Saleh c | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Ruth Cairnie d | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Maggie Chan Jones | 0% | 0% | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Ian Cheshire e | 0% | 0% | – | 8% | – | – | 8% | 19% |
| Iain Conn e | 0% | 0% | – | 1% | – | – | 0% | 33% |
| Steve Guggenheimer | 0% | 140% | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Isabel Hudson | 1% | 100% | – | 1% | 0% | – | 0% | 4% |
| Matthew Key | 9% | 100% | – | 9% | 100% | – | 2% | 13% |
| Raphael Kübler c | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Sara Weller | 1% | 0% | – | 5% | – | – | 0% | – |
| UK management colleagues | 5.5% | 0% | 53% | 3% | 0% | (25)% | 0% | 0% |
a Allison was appointed as Chief Executive during FY24 so the increase reflects her change in responsibilities and benefits in line with the Policy.
b Philip received his salary and benefits until he stood down on 31 January 2024. The leaving arrangements for Philip are fully disclosed under Leaving arrangements for Philip Jansen on page 116.
c Under the terms of the Relationship Agreement between BT Group plc and Deutsche Telekom and the Directors’ letter of appointment, no remuneration is payable for this position.
d Ruth joined during FY24 and so no relevant comparison can be presented.
e The director left during FY24 and any reduction reflects the pro-rated remuneration.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 123
The table below shows the percentage change in total remuneration paid to all employees compared to expenditure on dividends and share buybacks.
| Area | FY24 (£m) | FY23 (£m) | % change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration paid to all employees | 4,921 | 4,952 | (0.63)% |
| Dividends/share buybacks a | 840 | 940 | (10.6)% |
a Includes share purchases by the Trust as set out in note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
Embracing inclusion, diversity, accessibility and equality is core to our people strategy and critical to our growth. Our Inclusion, Equity and Diversity Strategy is a programmatic, evidence-based approach to help us understand and remove bias and other cognitive barriers from policies, processes, systems and decision making. It supports our aim to build the strongest foundations by making sure we apply an inclusion lens to everything we do and by promoting a culture where colleagues can thrive. More details on our Inclusion, Equity and Diversity Strategy can be found on pages 31 to 33.
At a group-level, our median hourly pay gap between male and female colleagues has decreased to 5.6% (6.1% in 2022). This remains favourably below the high-tech industry median of 12.9%, and the UK national median of 14.3% (ONS provisional).# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
Our Gender Pay Gap statement sets out the key information required under legislation and is available on our website bt.com/ genderpaygap Ruth Cairnie Chair of the Remuneration Committee 15 May 2024
The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the group and parent company financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Company law requires the directors to prepare group and parent company financial statements for each financial year. Under that law they are required to prepare the group financial statements in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards and with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. The parent company meets the definition of a qualifying entity under FRS 100 and the company financial statements are prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (FRS 101 “Reduced disclosure framework”, and applicable law).
Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the group and parent company, and of the group’s profit or loss for that period.
In preparing each of the group and parent company financial statements, the directors are required to:
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the parent company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy, at any time, the financial position of the parent company, and enable them to ensure that its financial statements comply with the 2006 Act. They are responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. They have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the directors are also responsible for preparing an annual strategic report, directors’ report, report on directors’ remuneration and corporate governance statement that comply with such law and regulation. The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the BT Group website. Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
In accordance with Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule (“DTR”) 4.1.16R, the financial statements will form part of the annual financial report prepared under DTR 4.1.17R and 4.1.18R. The auditor’s report on these financial statements provides no assurance over whether the annual financial report has been prepared in accordance with those requirements.
We confirm, to the best of our knowledge that:
We consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the group’s position, performance, business model and strategy.
This responsibility statement was approved by the Board on 15 May 2024 and was signed on its behalf by:
Allison Kirkby
Chief Executive
Simon Lowth
Chief Financial Officer
The directors present the Report of the directors, together with audited financial information for the year ended 31 March 2024. The Report of the directors also encompasses the entirety of our Corporate governance report on pages 83 to 130 for the purpose of section 463 of the Companies Act 2006 (the 2006 Act). The Report of the directors together with the Strategic report on pages 1 to 82 form the Management report for the basis of DTR 4.1.5R.
In accordance with DTR 4.1.14R, the financial statements will form part of the annual financial report prepared using the single electronic reporting format under the TD ESEF Regulation. The Auditor’s report on these financial statements provides no assurance over the ESEF format.
Our critical accounting estimates, key judgements and significant accounting policies conform with UK-adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRSs issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and are set out on page 150 of the consolidated financial statements. The directors have reviewed these policies and applicable estimation techniques and have confirmed that they are appropriate for the preparation of the FY24 consolidated financial statements.
As far as each of the directors is aware, there is no relevant audit information (as defined by section 418(3) of the 2006 Act) that hasn’t been disclosed to the auditor. Each of the directors confirms that all steps have been taken that ought to have been to make them aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditor has been made aware of that information.
In line with IAS 1 ‘Presentation of financial statements’, and FRC guidance on ‘risk management, internal control and related financial and business reporting’, management has taken into account all available information about the future for a period of at least, but not limited to, 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements when assessing the group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Strategic report on pages 1 to 82 includes information on the group structure, strategy and business model, the performance of each customer-facing unit and the impact of regulation and competition. The Group performance section on pages 50 to 57 includes information on our group financial results, financial outlook, cash flow and net debt, and balance sheet position. Notes 23, 25, 26 and 28 of the consolidated financial statements include information on the group’s investments, cash and cash equivalents, borrowings, derivatives, financial risk management objectives, hedging policies and exposure to interest, foreign exchange, credit, liquidity and market risks. Our principal risks and uncertainties are set out on pages 63 to 70 including details of each risk and how we manage them.
The directors carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks affecting the group, including any that could threaten our business model, future performance, insolvency or liquidity. This assessment is consistent with the assessment of our viability, as set out on pages 81 to 82, which has been based on the Company’s strategy, balance sheet and financing position, including our £2.1bn undrawn committed borrowing facility which matures in March 2027, and the potential impact of Our principal risks and uncertainties on pages 63 to 70; and which estimates the financial impact for a severe but plausible outcome for each risk, both individually and in combination through stochastic risk modelling. This stress testing confirmed that existing projected cash flows and cash management activities provide us with adequate headroom over the going concern assessment period.
Having assessed the principal and emerging risks, the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting when preparing the financial statements. This assessment covers the period to May 2025, which is consistent with FRC guidance. When reaching this conclusion, the directors took into account the group’s overall financial position (including trading results and the ability to repay term debt as it matures without recourse to refinancing) and the exposure to principal risks (including severe but plausible downsides, refer to the Viability statement on pages 81 to 82).
At 31 March 2024, the group had cash and cash equivalents of £0.4bn and current asset investments of £2.4bn. The group also had access to committed borrowing facilities of £2.1bn. These facilities were undrawn at the period-end and are not subject to renewal until March 2027.# Independent advice
The Board has a procedure that allows directors to seek independent professional advice at our expense. All directors also have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary and her nominated delegate.
We routinely buy insurance cover for directors, officers and employees in positions of managerial supervision of BT Group plc and its subsidiaries. This is intended to protect against defence costs, civil damages and, in some circumstances, civil fines and penalties (provided they are insurable) following an action brought against them in their personal capacity. The policy also covers individuals serving as directors of other companies or of joint ventures, or on boards of trade associations or charitable organisations at the group’s request. The insurance protects the directors and officers directly in circumstances where, by law, BTGroup plc cannot provide an indemnity. It also provides the group, subject to a retention, with cover against the cost of indemnifying a director or officer. One layer of insurance is ring- fenced for the directors of BT Group plc. As at 15 May 2024, and throughout FY24, BT Group plc’s wholly owned subsidiary, British Telecommunications plc, has provided an indemnity for a group of people similar to the group covered by the above insurance. Neither the insurance nor the indemnity provides cover where the individual is proven to have acted fraudulently or dishonestly. As permitted by BT Group plc’s Articles of Association, and to the extent permitted by law, the group indemnifies each of its directors and other officers against certain liabilities that may be incurred as a result of their positions within the group. The indemnity was in force throughout the tenure of each director during the last financial year, and remains in force.
During and at the end of FY24, none of BT Group plc’s directors were materially interested in any material transaction in relation to the group’s business. None are materially interested in any currently proposed material transactions.
All directors have a duty under the 2006 Act to avoid a situation in which he or she has, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the interests of the group. BT Group plc’s Articles of Association include provisions for dealing with directors’ conflicts of interest in accordance with the 2006 Act. The group has procedures in place, which it follows, to deal with such situations. These require the Board to:
* – consider each conflict situation separately on its particular facts
* – consider the conflict situation in conjunction with its other duties under the 2006 Act
* – keep records and Board minutes on any authorisations granted by directors and the scope of any approvals given
* – regularly review conflict authorisation.
The Company Secretary maintains a conflicts of interest register. The Conflicted Matters Committee identifies to what extent Board and Committee materials are likely to refer to a potential or actual conflict of interest between BT Group plc and Deutsche Telekom and, as a result, what materials should be shared with our Non- Independent, Non-Executive Director and Deutsche Telekom nominated representative. He owes duties to both BT Group plc and Deutsche Telekom, and the Conflicted Matters Committee helps him comply with his fiduciary duties, although ultimate responsibility rests with him.
The Board is responsible for reviewing the group’s systems of risk management and internal control each year, and for ensuring their effectiveness, including in respect of relevant assurance activities. These systems are designed to manage, rather than eliminate, risks we face that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives and delivering our strategy. Any system can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss. Our group risk management framework is simple and consistent, and defines our (1) risk mindset, (2) risk process and activities; and finally (3) governance.
The framework:
* – provides the business with the tools to take on the right risks and make smart risk decisions
* – supports the identification, assessment and management of the principal risks and uncertainties faced by the group
* – is an integral part of BT Group’s annual strategic review cycle.
The framework was designed in accordance with the FRC guidance on risk management, internal control and related financial and business reporting and has been in operation throughout the year and up to the date on which this document was approved. The framework was reviewed in FY24 and was deemed effective. Continuous improvements were made in FY24, including the rollout of a new training programme to establish a core level of understanding of expectations across our senior leadership team and all those with roles that are key to making our framework a success. There was also focus on embedding our Key Control Framework, a set of Group requirements, defined by subject matter experts, to be implemented consistently across all Units. More information on our group risk management framework can be found in the Risk management section on pages 61 to 62.
Internal audit carry out periodic assessments of the quality of risk management and control, promote effective risk management across all our units and report to management and the Audit & Risk Committee on the status of specific areas identified for improvement. We do not cover joint ventures and associates not controlled by the group in the scope of our group risk management framework. Such third parties are responsible for their own internal control assessment. Furthermore, the Audit & Risk Committee, on behalf of the Board, reviews the effectiveness of the systems of risk management and internal control across the group. Further details on how the Audit & Risk Committee fulfils these duties can be found on page 102.
The objective of our Capital Management Policy is to target an overall level of debt consistent with our credit rating objectives, while investing in the business, supporting our pension schemes and meeting our Distribution Policy. The Board regularly reviews the group’s capital structure. Management proposes actions and produces analyses which reflect the group’s investment plans and risk characteristics, as well as the macroeconomic conditions in which we operate. Our Funding Policy is to raise and invest funds centrally to meet the group’s anticipated requirements. We use a combination of capital market bond issuance and committed borrowing facilities to fund the group. When issuing debt, in order to avoid refinancing risk, group treasury will take into consideration the maturity profile of the group’s debt portfolio, financial market conditions as well as forecast cash flows. See note 28 to the consolidated financial statements for details of our Treasury Policy.
Details of the group’s financial risk management objectives, policies of the group and exposure to interest risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and foreign exchange are given in note 28 to the consolidated financial statements.
We take proactive steps to minimise the impact of adverse market conditions on our financial instruments. In managing investments and derivative financial instruments, group treasury monitors the credit quality across treasury counterparties and actively manages any exposures that arise. Management within the business units also actively monitors any exposures arising from trading balances.
Other than the financial commitments and contingent liabilities disclosed in note 31 to the consolidated financial statements, there are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on:
* – our financial condition
* – changes in financial condition
* – revenues or expenses
* – results of operations
* – liquidity
* – capital expenditure
* – capital resources.
We use a supply chain financing programme with a limited number of suppliers with short payment terms to extend them a more typical payment term. More details are disclosed in note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.
The group is involved in various legal proceedings, including actual or threatened litigation and government or regulatory investigations. For further details of legal and regulatory proceedings to which the group is party, please see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements. Apart from the information disclosed in note 18 to the consolidated financial statements, the group does not currently believe that there are any legal proceedings, government or regulatory investigations that may have a material adverse impact on the operations or financial condition of the group. In respect of each of the claims described in note 18, the nature and progression of such proceedings and investigations can make it difficult to predict the impact they will have on the group. Many factors prevent us from making these assessments with certainty, including the fact that some such proceedings or investigations are in early stages, no damages or remedies have been specified, and/or the frequently slow pace of litigation.# Other information
For the purposes of the Listing Rule (LR) 9.8.4R, the information below is disclosed as follows:
| Section information | Page |
|---|---|
| LR 9.8.4R(4) | 50 |
| LR 9.8.4R(12) | See below |
| LR 9.8.4R(13) | See below |
In respect of LR 9.8.4R(12) and (13), the trustee of the BT Group Employee Share Ownership Trust (the Trust) agrees to waive dividends payable on the BT Group plc shares it holds for satisfying awards under the group’s executive share plans. Under the rules of these share plans, the dividends are reinvested in BT Group plc shares that are added to the relevant share awards.
No other information is required to be disclosed pursuant to LR 9.8.4R.
Certain provisions of the 2006 Act (or regulations made pursuant thereto) require us to make additional disclosures within the Report of the directors. The disclosures referred to below are included elsewhere in this Annual Report and incorporated by reference into the Report of the directors:
| Section information | Page |
|---|---|
| Future developments | 1 to 82 |
| Particulars of any important events affecting BT Group or any of its subsidiary undertakings which have occurred since the end of the financial year | 221 |
| Research and development activities | 15 |
| How the directors have engaged with UK employees, had regard to UK employee interests, and the effect of that regard, including on principal decisions during the year | 24, 41 and 90 to 93 |
| How the directors have had regard to the need to foster business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, and the effect of that regard, including on principal decisions during the year | 26 to 27, 40 to 45 and 90 to 93 |
| Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and energy efficiency action | 38, 72 and 80 |
| Structure of BT Group plc’s share capital (including the rights and obligations attaching to the shares) | 147 |
| Significant agreements to which BT Group plc is a party that take effect, alter or terminate upon a change of control following a takeover | n/a |
| Related undertakings | 226 to 230 |
The following disclosures are not covered elsewhere in this Annual Report:
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 128
BT Group plc’s current Articles of Association were adopted pursuant to a resolution passed at the AGM of BT Group plc held on 15 July 2021 and contain, amongst others, provisions on the rights and obligations attaching to BT Group plc’s shares. The Articles of Association may only be amended by special resolution at a general meeting of the shareholders in accordance with applicable legislation. A copy of the current Articles of Association is available at bt.com/articles
The Articles of Association regulate the appointment and removal of directors, as does the 2006 Act and related legislation. The Board, and shareholders (by ordinary resolution), may appoint a person who is willing to be elected as a director, either to fill a vacancy or as an additional director. At every AGM, all directors must automatically retire. A retiring director is eligible for election or re-election, as applicable. In addition to any power of removal under the 2006 Act, the shareholders can pass an ordinary resolution to remove a director. Raphael Kübler was appointed as a Non-Independent, Non- Executive Director under the terms of the Relationship Agreement between BT Group plc and Deutsche Telekom. His appointment is terminable immediately by either party.
On a show of hands, every shareholder present in person or by proxy at any general meeting has one vote and, on a poll, every shareholder present in person or by proxy has one vote for each share which they hold. There are no restrictions on exercising voting rights except in situations where BT Group plc is legally entitled to impose such a restriction (for example where a notice under section 793 of the 2006 Act has been served).
If the share capital of BT Group plc were to be split into different classes of shares by special resolution, the special rights attached to any of those classes can be varied or withdrawn either:
(i) with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class; or
(ii) with the consent in writing of the holders of at least 75% in nominal value of the issued shares of that class.
BT Group plc can issue new shares and attach any rights and restrictions to them, as long as this is not restricted by special rights previously given to holders of any existing shares. Subject to this, the rights of new shares can take priority over the rights of existing shares, or existing shares can take priority over them, or the new shares and the existing shares can rank equally. BT Group plc currently has one class of shares.
There is no specific restriction on the transfer of BT Group plc shares in the group, which is governed by the Articles of Association and prevailing legislation.
Our policy is that no company in the group will make contributions in cash or in kind to any political party, whether by gift or loan. However, the definition of political donations used in the 2006 Act is significantly broader than the sense in which these words are ordinarily used. The 2006 Act’s remit could cover making members of Parliament and others in the political world aware of key industry issues and matters affecting BT Group plc, and enhancing their understanding of the group. The authority for political donations requested at the 2024 AGM is not intended to change this policy. It does, however, ensure that the group continues to act within the provisions of the 2006 Act, requiring companies to obtain shareholder authority before they make donations to political parties and/or political organisations as defined in the 2006 Act. During FY24, BT Group plc’s wholly owned subsidiary, British Telecommunications plc, paid the costs of attending events at (i) the Labour Party Conference and Business Conference; (ii) the Conservative Party Conference; and (iii) the Liberal Democrats Business Day. These costs totalled £9,343 (FY23: £5,848). No company in the BT Group made any loans to any political party.
As at 31 March 2024, BT Group plc had received notice, under the DTRs, in respect of the following holdings of 3% or more of the voting rights in its issued ordinary share capital:
| Date of notification | Shares | % of total voting rights | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Altice UK S.à r.l. | 22 May 2023 | 2,435,476,188 | 24.50% |
| T-Mobile Holdings | 23 March 2018 | 1,196,175,322 | 12.06% |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 13 June 2023 | 470,325,337 | 4.73% |
As at 15 May 2024, BT Group had not received any further such notices under the DTRs.
Engaging with our colleagues is critical to creating a culture where they can be their best and contribute to our purpose, ambition, strategy and long term success. Engaging with our colleagues takes many forms, including through:
The Colleague Board was in place throughout most of FY24, however the Board made the decision to disband the Colleague Board and going forward the Designated Non-Executive Director for Workforce Engagement will engage in a comprehensive colleague outreach programme in its place (see pages 90 to 91) – our quarterly Your Say colleague engagement surveys – regular colleague communications. Colleagues are kept well informed on matters such as the strategy and performance of the group, including after certain key events such as results and trading updates. We work with our highly active, engaged and award-winning People Networks. These colleague-driven groups raise awareness and advocate for change both inside and outside BT Group. Colleague engagement is 75%, +5% vs UK external benchmarks and +4% since September. The resolution of industrial action and agreement for a two-year pay award have contributed to the improvement in sentiment.
We encourage all of our colleagues to become shareholders in the business through the operation of all-employee share plans. We annually consider which all-employee plans to offer, both in the UK and globally.
We’re an inclusive employer and actively encourage the recruitment, development, promotion and retention of disabled people. In FY24 we focused on three areas to support our disabled colleagues:
– we committed to improving our workplace adjustments process so that colleagues can get the adjustments that they need when they need them, with a new initiative in the UK launched in July with plans to extend the rollout to India
– a development programme specifically aimed at disabled colleagues who are junior managers has been piloted, and work is under consideration for rollout to all career levels
– we want all colleagues and people managers to understand disability and how to support disabled colleagues, so we have launched three disability advocacy training pathways and published them to our internal disability hub for access by all colleagues.
This is the first year that we reported our disability pay gap; it reflects our drive for equal opportunity across all characteristics. At the time of the snapshot date in April 2023, the mean and median pay gaps were low, with a mean gap of 0.7% and a zero median gap. Further information can be found on page 32. We continued our partnership with the Business Disability Forum, and we will be working to make sure that we are able to meet and exceed the commitments we made to obtain our Disability Confident leader status and our membership of Valuable 500. Read more on inclusion and diversity at bt.com/inclusion-and-diversity
At the 2024 AGM, shareholders will be asked to vote on all resolutions including the Annual Report, the Report on directors’ remuneration, the election/re-election of directors, the reappointment of KPMG LLP as our external auditor and to authorise the Audit & Risk Committee to agree its remuneration, giving authority to the directors to allot BT Group plc shares and disapply pre-emption rights. Before the AGM, our share registrar, Equiniti, will count the proxy votes for and against each resolution, as well as votes withheld. The voting results will be announced by way of a stock exchange announcement and published on our website as soon as reasonably practicable following the conclusion of the AGM. As at previous AGMs, we will take votes on all matters at the 2024 AGM on a poll. The separate Notice of meeting 2024, which we send to all shareholders who have requested shareholder documents by post, contains the resolutions (with explanatory notes) which we will propose at the 2024 AGM on 11 July 2024. We notify all shareholders of the publication of these documents which are available on our website at bt.com/annualreport
The authority given at the 2023 AGM for BT Group plc to purchase in the market 993m of its shares, representing 10% of BT Group plc’s issued share capital (excluding treasury shares), expires at the conclusion of the 2024 AGM. We will ask shareholders to give a similar authority at the 2024 AGM.
During FY24 and up to 15 May 2024, no shares were purchased under this authority.
At the start of the year, £36m shares (having a total nominal value of £1.8m, and constituting 0.36% of the issued share capital (0.36% excluding treasury shares)) were held as treasury shares. During FY24, 19.8m treasury shares (having a nominal value of £995,000, and constituting 0.19% of the issued share capital 0.20% excluding treasury shares)) were transferred to meet BTGroup plc’s obligations under its employee share plans. At 31March 2024, a total of 16.3m shares (having a total nominal value of £815,000, and constituting 0.16% of the issued share capital 0.16% excluding treasury shares)) were held as treasury shares (see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements). Since 31 March 2024 (up to and including 15 May 2024), 552,071 treasury shares (having a nominal value of £27,600, and constituting 0.005% of the issued share capital (0.005% excluding treasury shares)) have been transferred to meet BT Group plc’s obligations under its employee share plans. At 15 May 2024, a total of 15.7m shares (having a nominal value of £787,300, and constituting 0.16% of the issued share capital (0.16% excluding treasury shares)) were held as treasury shares.
In addition, during FY24 and up to 15 May 2024 the Trust purchased 98.2m BT Group plc shares for a total consideration of £132.5m. The Trust held 158.4m shares both at 31 March 2024 and 15 May 2024.
We have chosen to include the following information in the Strategic report in line with the 2006 Act (otherwise required by law to be included in the Report of the directors):
– the final dividend proposed by the Board (page 51)
– an indication of likely future developments in the business of BT Group plc and its group (pages 1 to 82)
– an indication of our research and development activities (page 15)
– information about how the directors engaged with UK employees, had regard to UK employee interests, and the effect of that regard, including on principal decisions during the year (pages 24, 41 and 90 to 91)
– information about how the directors have had regard to the need to foster business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, and the effect of that regard, including on principal decisions during the year (pages 26 to 27, 40 to 45 and 90 to 91)
– information about greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and energy efficiency action (pages 38, 71 to 80).
By order of the Board
Sabine Chalmers
Group General Counsel, Company Secretary & DirectorRegulatoryAffairs
15 May 2024
Report of the directors continued
Look out for these throughout the report
| Contents | |
|---|---|
| Significant accounting policies | 132 |
| Independent auditor’s report | |
| Critical and key accounting estimates and significant judgements | |
| Group income statement | 145 |
| Group statement of comprehensive income | 146 |
| Group balance sheet | 147 |
| Group statement of changes in equity | 148 |
| Group cash flow statement | 149 |
| Notes to the consolidated financial statements | 150 |
| Basis of preparation | 150 |
| Critical accounting estimates and significant judgements | 151 |
| Material accounting policies that apply to the overall financial statements | 152 |
| Segment information | 153 |
| Revenue | 156 |
| Operating costs | 160 |
| Employees | 161 |
| Audit, audit related and other non-audit services | 162 |
| Specific items | 162 |
| Taxation | 164 |
| EPS | 167 |
| Dividends | 167 |
| Intangible assets | 168 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 172 |
| Leases | 175 |
| Trade and other receivables | 179 |
| Trade and other payables | 182 |
| Provisions & contingent liabilities | 183 |
| Retirement benefit plans | 185 |
| Own shares (BT Group) | 196 |
| Share-based payments | 196 |
| Divestments & assets and liabilities classified as held for sale | 198 |
| Investments | 201 |
| Joint ventures and associates | 202 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 205 |
| Loans and other borrowings (BT Group) | 206 |
| Finance expense and income | 210 |
| Financial instruments and risk management | 211 |
| Other reserves | 218 |
| Related party transactions | 218 |
| Financial commitments | 219 |
| Re-presentation of prior year comparatives | 220 |
| Post balance sheet events | 221 |
| BT Group – Financial Statements of BT Group plc | 222 |
| Related undertakings | 226 |
| BT Group Additional Information/APM | 231 |
Our opinion is unmodified
In our opinion:
– the financial statements of BT Group plc give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 March 2024, and of the Group’s profit for the year then ended;
– the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards;
– the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK accounting standards, including FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework; and
– the Group and Parent Company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
What our opinion covers
We have audited the Group and Parent Company financial statements of BT Group plc (“the Company”) for the year ended 31 March 2024 (“FY24”) included in the Annual Report, which comprise:
Group
– Group income statement,
– Group statement of comprehensive income,
– Group balance sheet,
– Group statement of changes in equity,
– Group cash flow statement
– Notes 1 to 33 to the Group financial statements, including the accounting policies in the respective notes.
Parent Company (BT Group plc)
– Company balance sheet
– Company statement of changes in equity
– Notes 1 to 3 to the Parent Company financial statements, including the accounting policies in note 1.# Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and applicable law. Our responsibilities are described below. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is a sufficient and appropriate basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion and matters included in this report are consistent with those discussed and included in our reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee (“ARC”). We have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities under, and we remain independent of the Group in accordance with, UK ethical requirements including the FRC Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities.
Our risk assessment is driven by understanding of the applicable financial reporting framework, our knowledge of the business, the industry and the wider economic environment in which BT Group plc operates. Revenue from non-long-term contracts remains a focus area due to the complexity arising from the large number of low value transactions managed through a number of distinct billing systems, and the complex IT landscape linking the billing systems together. In addition, the bespoke nature of the pricing structure within some of Business’ contracts means that there is a higher risk of processing error and fraud in relation to a proportion of Business’ revenue derived from certain billing systems and estimation uncertainty over the associated refund liabilities.
In the current year the Group recognised an impairment charge against goodwill allocated to the Business cash generating unit (CGU) of £488mn (FY23: nil), reflecting the execution risk of the CGU’s business plan and increased uncertainty over the projected cashflows.
The valuation of the BT pension scheme (“BTPS”) defined obligation also remains a focus area as it is complex, relying on key actuarial assumptions such as discount rates, RPI, and mortality. We continue to have a focus on the BTPS which holds diverse unquoted assets which are valued based on inputs not directly observable. The valuation of these assets requires the involvement of experts and significant judgement over the key unobservable input.
We continue to identify the recoverability of the Parent Company investment in subsidiaries as a focus area for the Parent Company's standalone accounts. This is due to the materiality of the Parent Company's investment in subsidiaries compared to the company’s total assets.
The TNT Sport Joint venture company is in its second year of operations and all significant risks associated with the initial recognition of the balances relating to the disposal of the BT sports division and subsequent re-investment in the Sports JV are no longer applicable.
| Risk | FY24 vs FY23 | Item |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of revenue due to complex billing systems (Group) | é | 4.1 |
| Impairment of Goodwill attributable to Business CGU (Group) | … | 4.2 |
| Valuation of defined benefit obligation of the BT pension scheme (BTPS) (Group) | çè | 4.3 |
| Valuation of unquoted investments in the BT pension scheme (BTPS) (Group) | ê | 4.4 |
| Recoverability of Parent company investment in subsidiaries (Parent Company) | çè | 4.5 |
During the year, the ARC met 6 times. KPMG are invited to attend all ARC meetings and are provided with an opportunity to meet with the ARC in private sessions without the Executive Directors being present. For each Key Audit Matter, we have set out communications with the ARC in section 4, including matters that required particular judgement for each. The matters included in the Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s report on pages 99 to 103 are materially consistent with our observations of those meetings.
We have fulfilled our ethical responsibilities under, and remain independent of the Group in accordance with, UK ethical requirements including the FRC Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities. We have not performed any non-audit services during the year ended 31 March 2024 or subsequently which are prohibited by the FRC Ethical Standard. We were first appointed as auditor by the shareholders for the year ended 31 March 2019. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is for the 6 financial years ended 31 March 2024. Jonathan Mills has succeeded John Luke as the Lead Engagement Partner for the year ended 31 March 2024. The Group Engagement partner is required to rotate every 5 years. As these are the first set of the Group’s financial statements signed by Jonathan Mills, he will be required to rotate off after the FY28 audit.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
132
Financial statements
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of BT Group plc
The average tenure of partners responsible for component audits as set out in section 7 below is 3 years, with the shortest being 1 year and the longest being 4 years.
| Item | FY23 £m | FY24 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Total audit fee | 95 | 135 |
| Audit related fees (including interim review) | 61.7 | 87.7 |
| Other services | 80 | 110 |
| Non-audit fee as a % of total audit and audit related fee | 35 | 50 |
| Date first appointed | 4.75 | 5.4 |
| Uninterrupted audit tenure | 11 July 2018 | 2029 |
| Reappointment | 6 years | 1 year |
| Next financial period which requires a tender | 4 years | 3 years |
| Tenure of Group engagement partner | 0.65% | 0.89% |
| Average tenure of component signing partners | 0.80% | 0.65% |
The scope of our work is influenced by our view of materiality and our assessed risk of material misstatement. Group materiality is determined with reference to a benchmark of Group Total Revenue (FY23: Profit before tax normalised by adding back the one-off operating cost arising from the BT Sport disposal). We have determined overall materiality for the Group financial statements as a whole at £135m (FY23: £95m) and for the Parent Company financial statements as a whole at £100m (FY23: £90m).
A key judgement in determining materiality was selecting the most relevant metric as the benchmark, considering which metrics have the greatest bearing on shareholder decisions. The relevant metrics considered for the current year included Revenue, Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation ("EBITDA"), Profit before tax from continuing operations ("PBTCO"), and Total assets. The selected benchmark for the current year is "Revenue," which represents a change from the prior period where the selected benchmark was PBTCO. The change to Revenue is deemed appropriate given shareholders’ focus on revenue and cash generation and the current stage of the Fibre To The Premise (“FTTP”) capital investment program. In the context of the high levels of capital investment for future growth, Revenue is considered a more representative and stable measure of performance. As such, we based our Group materiality on Total Revenue, of which it represents 0.65% (FY23: 4.95% of normalised PBTCO).
Materiality for the Parent Company financial statements as a whole was set at £100m (FY23: £90m), determined with reference to a benchmark of Parent Company total assets, limited to be less than materiality for Group materiality as a whole. It represents 0.89% (FY23: 0.80%) of the stated benchmark.
| Metric | FY23 £m | FY24 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Group GPM | 95 | 135 |
| Group HCM | 61.7 | 87.7 |
| PLC LCM | 80 | 110 |
| AMPT | 90 | 100 |
| Group Materiality | 35 | 50 |
| GPM | 4.75 | 5.4 |
| Group Performance Materiality | 11 July 2018 | 2029 |
| HCM | 6 years | 1 year |
| Highest Component Materiality | 4 years | 3 years |
| PLC Parent Company Materiality | 0.65% | 0.89% |
| LCM Lowest Component Materiality | 0.80% | 0.65% |
| AMPT Audit Misstatement Posting Threshold |
We have performed risk assessment and planning procedures to determine which of the Group’s components are likely to include risks of material misstatement to the Group financial statements, the type of procedures to be performed at these components and the extent of involvement required from our component auditors around the world. The total number of entities in scope for FY24 is three which is consistent with FY23. The components within the scope of our work accounted for the percentages illustrated on page 134. In addition, we have performed Group level analysis on the remaining components to determine whether further risks of material misstatement exist in those components. We consider the scope of our audit, as communicated to the Audit and Risk Committee, to be an appropriate basis for our audit opinion.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
133
Financial statements
| Financial Statement Area | Full scope audits | Remaining components |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 87% | 13% |
| Total assets | 96% | 4% |
| Profit before tax | 83% | 17% |
In planning our audit, we considered the potential impacts of climate change on the Group’s business and its financial statements. The Group has committed as set out in the Strategic Report to be a net-zero business by 2030 and has also outlined several shorter- term climate change targets. As a part of our audit, we have performed a risk assessment, including enquiries of management, to understand how the impact of commitments made by the Group in respect of climate change, as well as the physical and transition risks of climate change, may affect the financial statements and our audit. The potential impacts of these matters relate to the forward- looking estimates, which include projections for impairment assessment of goodwill, useful economic life of vehicle fleet and infrastructure assets impacting on future depreciation charges, and significant assumptions used in pension asset valuations. Taking into account our risk assessment procedures, the remaining useful economic lives of relevant assets and the nature of the assumptions used in the pension valuation, and the financial impact of climate risk and opportunities on the forecasted cashflows, we have assessed that there is not a significant risk to the balances in the financial statements as a result of climate change. Therefore, there is no material impact on the Group’s critical accounting estimates and our key audit matters.# KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of BT Group plc
We have read the disclosures of climate related information in the annual report and considered their consistency with the financial statements and our audit knowledge. We have not been engaged to provide assurance over the accuracy of the climate risk disclosures in the Annual Report.
The directors have prepared the financial statements on the going concern basis as they do not intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease their operations, and they have concluded that the Group’s and the Parent Company’s financial position means that this is realistic. They have also concluded that there are no material uncertainties that could have cast significant doubt over the Group's ability to continue as a going concern for at least a year from the date of approval of the financial statements (“the going concern period”).
We used our knowledge of the Group, its industry, and the general economic environment to identify the inherent risks to its business model and analysed how those risks might affect the Group’s and Parent Company’s financial resources or ability to continue operations over the going concern period. The risks that we considered most likely to adversely affect the Group’s and Parent Company’s available financial resources over this period were:
We also considered less predictable but realistic second order impacts, such as a large scale cyber breach, the UK experiencing a significant recession, adverse changes to telecoms regulation, which could result in a rapid reduction of available financial resources. We considered whether these risks could plausibly affect the liquidity in the going concern period by comparing severe but plausible downside scenarios that could arise from these risks individually and collectively against the level of available financial resources indicated by the Group’s financial forecasts.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
134
Financial statements
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of BT Group plc
continued
Our procedures also included an assessment of whether the going concern disclosure in note 1 to the financial statements gives a full and accurate description of the directors’ assessment of going concern. Accordingly, based on those procedures, we found the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting without any material uncertainty for the Group and Parent Company to be acceptable.
However, as we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were made, the above conclusions are not a guarantee that the Group or the Parent Company will continue in operation.
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether there is a material inconsistency between the directors’ disclosures in respect of emerging and principal risks and the viability statement, and the financial statements and our audit knowledge. Based on those procedures, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
We are also required to review the Viability statement set out on page 81 under the Listing Rules. Our work is limited to assessing these matters in the context of only the knowledge acquired during our financial statements audit. As we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were made, the absence of anything to report on these statements is not a guarantee as to the Group’s and Parent Company’s longer-term viability.
We have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to these disclosures. We have concluded that these disclosures are materially consistent with the financial statements and our audit knowledge.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by us, including those which had the greatest effect on:
We include below the key audit matters in decreasing order of audit significance together with our key audit procedures to address those matters and our results from those procedures. These matters were addressed, and our results are based on procedures undertaken, for the purpose of our audit of the financial statements as a whole. We do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
| Financial Statement Elements | FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | £20.8bn | £20.7bn |
| Our assessment of risk vs FY23 | é Increased |
|---|---|
| Our results | FY24: Acceptable FY23: Acceptable |
Processing error
The Group’s non-long-term contract revenue consists of a large number of low value transactions. The Group operates a number of distinct billing and order-entry systems and the IT landscape underpinning the end-to-end revenue process is complex. There are multiple products sold at multiple rates with varying price structures in place. These represent a combination of service-based products, such as fixed line telephony, as well as goods, such as the provision of mobile handsets. The revenue recognition of non-long-term contract revenue is not subject to significant judgement. However, due to the large number of transactions, manual nature of order entry and complexity of the billing systems, this is considered to be an area of most significance in our audit. Within Business we have identified a significant risk of processing error in relation to some billing systems. In addition, the bespoke nature of the pricing structure within some of Business’ contracts means that there is a higher risk of processing error and fraud in relation to a proportion of Business’ revenue derived from certain billing systems.
Subjective estimate of refund liabilities in Business
The bespoke pricing structure results in a risk of billing inaccuracies within a proportion of Business’ revenue and so over the identification of financial liabilities for associated customer refunds. The Group have estimated refund liabilities based on the
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
135
Financial statements
results of a sample of billing items leading to estimation uncertainty over the refund liabilities. The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk assessment for audit planning purposes, we determined that the quantum of refund liabilities had a high degree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality for the financial statements as a whole. In conducting our final audit work, we reassessed the degree of estimation uncertainty to be less than materiality. The financial statements (note 5) disclose the range estimated by the Group.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
Process understanding: Obtaining an understanding of the revenue processes by observing transactions from customer initiation to cash received for material revenue streams.# Audit and Risk Committee Report (Continued)
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| Revenue £5.6bn | Revenue £5.9bn |
| Refund Liabilities £32m | Refund Liabilities £28m |
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| High | High |
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| Acceptable | Acceptable |
Error rates and refund liabilities. We identified that the Group's revenue recognition process involves the risk of overstatement due to pricing errors, which could lead to the need for customer refunds. The accuracy of the estimated liabilities for customer refunds is dependent on the Group's assessment of the error rates and the associated legal and regulatory risks.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
We performed the detailed tests above rather than seeking to rely on the Group’s controls because our knowledge of the design of these controls, indicated that we would be unlikely to obtain the required evidence to support reliance on them.
Our discussions with and reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee included:
We performed an assessment of whether the overstatements of revenue identified through these procedures were material, taking into account findings from other areas of the audit and qualitative aspects of the financial statements as a whole.
We exercised judgement over the adequacy of liabilities for customer refunds in light of overstatements of revenue identified through our testing over pricing within Business. Particular judgement was needed over the applicable error rate and periods impacted.
The results of our testing were satisfactory (FY23: satisfactory) and we considered the revenue relating to non-long-term contract revenue and the estimate of refund liabilities and related disclosures to be acceptable (FY23: acceptable).
Further information in the Annual Report and Accounts: Refer to page 156 for the accounting policy on Revenue (note 5) for the financial disclosures.
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| Goodwill allocated to Business CGU £3.56bn | Goodwill allocated to Business CGU £4.08bn |
| Impairment charge £0.49bn | Impairment charge £0.0bn |
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| High | High |
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| Acceptable | Acceptable |
Forecast-based assessment. The recoverability of goodwill allocated to the Business cash generating unit (“CGU”) is assessed using value in use which is based on forecast future cash flows, within a discounted cashflow model. For the Business CGU, the execution risk associated with the transition from legacy to next generation telecommunication products and services in conjunction with ongoing cost reductions and uncertainty in relation to the economic outlook renders precise forecasting of the underlying cash flows challenging. There is also estimation uncertainty over the appropriate terminal growth rate and discount rate applied to the projected cashflows.
In the current year the Group recognised an impairment charge against goodwill allocated to the Business CGU of £488mn (FY23:nil), reflecting the execution risk of the CGU’s business planand increased uncertainty over the projected cashflows. The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk assessment, we determined that the value in use used to support the recoverable amount of the goodwill allocated to the Business CGU has a high degree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range of reasonable impairment outcomes greater than our materiality for the financial statements as a whole, and possibly many times that amount. The financial statements (note13) disclose the sensitivity estimated by the Group.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
We performed the detailed tests above rather than seeking to rely on any of the Group’s controls because the nature of the balance is such that we would expect to obtain audit evidence primarily through the detailed procedures described.
Our discussions with and reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee included:
We identified the following as the areas of particular auditor judgement:
We found the goodwill allocated to the Business CGU balance, and the related impairment charge, to be acceptable (FY23: acceptable.
Further information in the Annual Report and Accounts: See the Audit and Risk Committee Report on page 101 for details on how the Audit and Risk Committee considered impairment of goodwill as an area of significant attention, page 168 for the accounting policy on Impairment on goodwill (note 13) for the financial disclosures.
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| BTPS Obligation £40.0bn | BTPS Obligation £41.6bn |
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| High | High |
| FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| Acceptable | Acceptable |
Subjective valuation. The valuation of the BT pension scheme (“BTPS”) defined benefit obligation is complex and requires a significant degree of estimation in determining the assumptions. It is dependent on key actuarial assumptions, including the discount rate, retail price index (“RPI”) and mortality assumptions. A change in the methodology applied or small changes in the key actuarial assumptions may have a significant impact on the measurement of the defined benefit pension obligation. The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk assessment, we determined the valuation of the BTPS defined benefit obligation had a high degree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality for the financial statements as a whole, and possibly many times that amount. The financial statements (note 19) disclose the key sensitivities of the defined benefit pension obligation to changes in key assumptions.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
With the support of our own actuarial specialists, we performed the following:
– Evaluating the judgements made and the appropriateness of methodologies used by the Group and the Group’s experts in determining the key actuarial assumptions;
– Comparing the assumptions used by the Group to our independently compiled expected ranges based on market observable data points and our market experience.
Assessing transparency:
Considering the adequacy of the Group’s disclosures in respect of the sensitivity of the obligation to these assumptions.
We performed the tests above rather than seeking to rely on any of the Group’s controls because the nature of the balance is such that we would expect to obtain audit evidence primarily through the detailed procedures described.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
137
Financial statements
Our discussions with and reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee included:
– Our definition of the key audit matter relating to the valuation of the defined benefit obligation of the BTPS.
– Our audit response to the key audit matter which included the use of specialists to challenge key aspects of the Group’s actuarial valuation.
We identified the following as the areas of particular auditor judgement:
– Subjective and complex auditor judgement was required in evaluating the key actuarial assumptions used by the Group (including the discount rate, retail price index and mortality assumptions).
We found the valuation of the defined benefit obligation of the BT Pension Scheme and related disclosures to be acceptable (FY23: acceptable).
Further information in the Annual Report and Accounts:
See the Audit and Risk Committee Report on page 101 for details on how the Audit and Risk Committee considered the valuation of defined benefit obligation of the BTPS as an area of significant attention, page 185 for the accounting policy on the Retirement Benefit Plan (note 19) for the financial disclosures.
| Financial Statement Elements | FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|---|
| Longevity Insurance Contract for the BTPS: included within the unquoted BTPS plan assets | £(0.9)bn | £(0.8)bn |
ê
FY24: Acceptable
FY23: Acceptable
Subjective valuation
The BTPS have unquoted plan assets in private equity, UK and overseas property, mature infrastructure, longevity insurance contracts, secure income and non-core credit assets which are classified as fair value level three assets. Significant judgement is required to determine the value of a portion of these unquoted investments, which are valued based on inputs that are not directly observable. The Group engages valuation experts to value these assets. In FY24, the most significant valuation judgement of the above is in respect of a longevity insurance contract. The key unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value of that longevity insurance contract include the discount rate and projected future mortality. The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk assessment, we determined that the valuation of a longevity insurance contract asset held by the BTPS has a high degree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality for the financial statements as a whole, and possibly many times that amount. The financial statements (note 19) disclose the key sensitivities of the valuation of plan assets to changes in key assumptions.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
* Assessing valuers’ credentials: Evaluating the scope, competencies and objectivity of the Group’s external experts who assisted in determining the key unobservable inputs and the valuation of a longevity insurance contract.
* Comparing valuations: Challenging, with the support of our own actuarial specialists, the fair value of a longevity insurance contract by comparing with an independently developed range of fair values using assumptions, such as the discount rate and projected future mortality, based on external data. External data included market views of the impact from COVID on future mortality, market discount rates and the demographic analysis available from the 30 June 2023 triennial funding valuation.
* Assessing transparency: Considering the adequacy of the Group’s disclosures in respect of the sensitivity of a longevity insurance contract asset valuation to these assumptions.
We performed the detailed tests above rather than seeking to rely on any of the Group's controls because our knowledge of the design of these controls indicated that we would not be able to obtain the required evidence to support reliance on controls.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
138
Financial statements
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of BT Group plc continued
Our discussions with and reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee included:
– Our definition of the key audit matter relating to the valuation of a longevity insurance contract.
– Our audit response to the key audit matter which included the use of specialists to challenge key aspects of the Group’s valuation of a longevity insurance contract.
We identified the following as the areas of particular auditor judgement:
– Subjective and complex auditor judgement was required in evaluating the key assumptions used by the Group (including the discount rate and projected mortality)
We found the valuation of a longevity insurance contract and related disclosures to be acceptable (FY23: acceptable).
Further information in the Annual Report and Accounts:
See the Audit and Risk Committee Report on page 101 for details on how the Audit and Risk Committee considered the valuation of unquoted investments in the BTPS (including the longevity insurance contract) as an area of significant attention, page 185 for the accounting policy on Retirement benefit plans (note 19) for the financial disclosures.
| Financial Statement Elements | FY24 | FY23 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment in subsidiary | £11.3bn | £11.3bn |
çè
FY24: Acceptable
FY23: Acceptable
Low risk, high value
The carrying amount of the Parent company investment in subsidiary represents 100% (FY23: 100%), of the Parent company’s total assets. The recoverability is not at a high risk of significant misstatement or subject to significant judgement. However, due to their materiality in the context of the Parent company financial statements, this is considered to be the area that had the greatest effect on our overall Parent company audit.
Our procedures to address the risk included:
* Test of detail: Comparing the carrying amount of the Parent company’s investment with the calculated value in use of the investment.
* Comparing valuations: Comparing the carrying amount of the Parent company’s investment with the market capitalisation of the Group.
We performed the tests above rather than seeking to rely on any of the Parent company’s controls because the nature of the balance is such that we would expect to obtain audit evidence primarily through the detailed procedures described.
Our discussions with and reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee included:
– Our definition of the key audit matter and our findings along with the procedures performed to address the corresponding risk.
– The result of our substantive testing.
We did not identify any areas of particular auditor judgement.
We found the Parent company’s conclusion that there is no impairment of its investment in subsidiary to be acceptable (FY23: acceptable).
Further information in the Annual Report and Accounts:
Refer to page 224 for the accounting policy on Investments in Subsidiaries Undertakings. We continue to perform procedures over the ongoing measurement of balances held in relation to BT’s investment in the Sports JV. However, in FY23 all significant risks were associated with the disposal accounting and subsequent re-investment in the Sports JV related to the initial recognition of balances. We have concluded there are no significant risks over the subsequent measurement of these balances in FY24 and therefore we have not identified a related KAM in our audit report in FY24.
To identify risks of material misstatement due to fraud (“fraud risks”) we assessed events or conditions that could indicate an incentive or pressure to commit fraud or provide an opportunity to commit fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included:
– enquiring of directors, the Audit and Risk Committee, internal audit and inspection of policy documentation as to the Group’s high-level policies and procedures to prevent and detect fraud, including the internal audit function, and the Group’s channel for “whistleblowing”, as well as whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected or alleged fraud;
– reading Board, Remuneration Committee and Executive Committee minutes;
– considering remuneration incentive schemes and performance targets for management and directors including the targets for management remuneration;
– using analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships.
We communicated identified fraud risks throughout the audit team and remained alert to any indications of fraud throughout the audit.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 139 Financial statements
As required by auditing standards and taking into account possible pressures to meet profit targets, recent revisions to guidance and our overall knowledge of the control environment, we perform procedures to address the risk of management override of controls, and the risk of fraudulent revenue recognition in relation to certain revenue streams in Business, in particular:
– the risk that Group and component management may be in a position to make inappropriate accounting entries; and
– the risk that certain revenue streams in Business are overstated given the bespoke nature of the pricing structure within these contracts and associated risk of processing errors.
In determining the audit procedures, we took into account the results of our evaluation and test of operating effectiveness of some of the Group-wide fraud risk management controls. We also performed procedures including:
– Identifying journal entries to test for all full scope components based on high risk criteria and comparing the identified entries to supporting documentation. These included those posted by senior finance management, those posted and approved by the same user and those posted to unusual or seldom used accounts;
– Assessing whether the judgements made in making accounting estimates are indicative of a potential bias;
– Increased testing over certain revenue streams in Business.
– Evaluating the business purpose for significant unusual transactions.
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the financial statements from our general commercial and sector experience, through discussion with the directors and other management (as required by auditing standards), and from inspection of the Group’s regulatory and legal correspondence and discussed with the directors and other management the policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations. As the Group is regulated, our assessment of risks involved gaining an understanding of the control environment including the Group’s procedures for complying with regulatory requirements.
We communicated identified laws and regulations throughout our team and remained alert to any indications of non-compliance throughout the audit. This included communication from the Group to full-scope component audit teams of relevant laws and regulations identified at the Group level, and a request for full scope component auditors to report to the Group audit team any instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that could give rise to a material misstatement at the Group level.
The potential effect of these laws and regulations on the financial statements varies considerably.
Firstly, the Group is subject to laws and regulations that directly affect the financial statements including financial reporting legislation (including related companies legislation), distributable profits legislation, taxation legislation, and pension legislation and we assessed the extent of compliance with these laws and regulations as part of our procedures on the related financial statement items.
Secondly, the Group is subject to many other laws and regulations where the consequences of non-compliance could have a material effect on amounts or disclosures in the financial statements, for instance through the imposition of fines or litigation or the loss of the Group’s licence to operate. We identified the following areas as those most likely to have such an effect: anti-bribery, regulations affecting telecommunication providers, and certain aspects of company legislation recognising the financial and regulated nature of the Group’s activities (including compliance with Ofcom regulation) and its legal form. Auditing standards limit the required audit procedures to identify non-compliance with these laws and regulations to enquiry of the directors and other management and inspection of regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. Therefore if a breach of operational regulations is not disclosed to us or evident from relevant correspondence, an audit will not detect that breach.
For the legal matters discussed in note 18 we assessed disclosures against our understanding from legal correspondence.
We discussed with the Audit and Risk Committee other matters related to actual or suspected breaches of laws or regulations, for which disclosure is not necessary, and considered any implications for our audit.
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some material misstatements in the financial statements, even though we have properly planned and performed our audit in accordance with auditing standards. For example, the further removed non- compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely the inherently limited procedures required by auditing standards would identify it. In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of non-detection of fraud, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect material misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing non-compliance or fraud and cannot be expected to detect non-compliance with all laws and regulations.
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set quantitative thresholds and overlay qualitative considerations to help us determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our procedures, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in the aggregate, on the financial statements as a whole.
| £135m (FY23: £95m) | |
|---|---|
| Materiality for the Group financial statements as awhole | |
| What we mean | A quantitative reference for the purpose of planning and performing our audit. |
| Basis for determining materiality and judgements applied | Materiality for the Group financial statements as a whole was set at £135m (FY23: £95m). This was determined with reference to a benchmark of Total Revenue (of which it represents 0.65% (FY23: 4.95% of normalised PBTCO)). A key judgement in determining materiality was selecting the most relevant metric as the benchmark, considering which metrics have the greatest bearing on shareholder decisions. The relevant metrics considered for the current year included Revenue, Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (“EBITDA”), Profit before tax from continuing operations (“PBTCO”), and Total assets. The selected benchmark for the current year is "Revenue," which represents a change from the prior period where the selected benchmark was PBTCO. The change to Revenue is deemed appropriate given shareholders' focus on revenue and cash generation and the current stage of the Fibre To The Premise (“FTTP”) capital investment program. In the context of the high levels of capital investment for future growth, Revenue is considered a more representative and stable measure of performance. Our Group materiality of £135m was determined by applying a percentage to the Total Revenue. When using a benchmark of Total Revenue to determine overall materiality, KPMG’s approach for listed entities considers a guideline range 0.5% – 1% of the measure. In setting overall Group materiality, we applied a percentage of 0.65% (FY23: 4.95% of normalised PBTCO) to the benchmark. |
| Materiality for the Parent company financial statements as a whole at £100m (FY23: £90m), determined with reference to a benchmark of Parent Company total assets, limited to be less than materiality for Group materiality as a whole. It represents 0.89% (FY23: 0.80%) of the stated benchmark. |
| £87.7m (FY23: £61.7m) | |
|---|---|
| Performance materiality | |
| What we mean | Our procedures on individual account balances and disclosures were performed to a lower threshold, performance materiality, so as to reduce to an acceptable level the risk that individually immaterial misstatements in individual account balances add up to a material amount across the financial statements as a whole. |
| Basis for determining performance materiality and judgements applied | We have considered performance materiality at a level of 65% (FY23: 65%) of materiality for BT Group plc’s Group financial statements as a whole to be appropriate. The Parent company performance materiality was set at £65m (FY23: £58.5m), which equates to 65% (FY23: 65%) of materiality for the Parent company financial statements as a whole. We applied this percentage in our determination of performance materiality based on the level of identified misstatements and control deficiencies during the year and the prior year. |
| £5.4m (FY23: £4.75m) | |
|---|---|
| Audit misstatement posting threshold | |
| What we mean | This is the amount below which identified misstatements are considered to be clearly trivial from a quantitative point of view. |
We set our audit misstatement posting threshold at 4% (FY23: 5%) of our materiality for the Group financial statements. We also report to the Audit and Risk Committee any other identified misstatements that warrant reporting on qualitative grounds.
The overall materiality for the Group financial statements of £135m (FY23: £95m) compares as follows to the main financial statement caption amounts:
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 141 | Financial statements
---|---|---|---
Total Group Revenue | FY24 | FY23
Financial statement Caption | £20,797m | £20,681m
Group Materiality as % of caption | 0.65% | 0.46%
Group Profit Before Tax | FY24 | FY23
Financial statement Caption | £1,186m | £1,729m
Group Materiality as % of caption | 11.38% | 5.49%
Total Group Assets | FY24 | FY23
Financial statement Caption | £51,739m | £52,752m
Group Materiality as % of caption | 0.26% | 0.18%
What we mean
How the Group audit team determined the procedures to be performed across the Group.
The Group has 215 (FY23: 226) reporting components. In order to determine the work performed at the reporting component level, we identified those components which we considered to be of individual financial significance, those which were significant due to risk and those remaining components on which we required procedures to be performed to provide us with the evidence we required in order to conclude on the Group financial statements as a whole.
We determined individually financially significant components as those contributing at least 10% (FY23: 10%) of revenue or total assets. We selected revenue and total assets because these are the most representative of the relative size of the components.
We identified 2 (FY23: 2) components as individually financially significant components and performed full scope audits on these components.
We selected 1 (FY23: 1) components for which we performed work other than audits for Group reporting purposes, that was not individually significant but were included in the scope of our Group reporting work in order to provide further coverage over the Group's results.
The components within the scope of our work accounted for the following percentages of the Group’s results, with the prior year comparatives indicated in brackets:
| Scope | Number of components | Range of materiality applied | Group Revenue | Group PBT | Group Total assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full scope audit | 2 (2) | £90m – £110m (£60m – £80m) | 87% (86%) | 83% (78%) | 96% (90%) |
| Specified audit procedure | 1(1) | £50m (£35m) | 0% (0%) | 10%* (11%) | 0% (0%) |
*as a % of Total operating cost
For the residual components, we performed analysis at an aggregated Group level to re-examine our assessment that there were no significant risks of material misstatement within those.
The work on 1 of the 3 in scope components (FY23: 1 of the 3 in scope components) was performed by component auditors and the rest, including the audit of the Parent company, was performed by the Group audit team.
The Group audit team has also performed audit procedures on the following areas on behalf of the components:
– Testing of IT Systems
– Litigation and claims
These items were audited by the Group team for efficiency purposes, where the Group team has direct access to the underlying information. The Group team communicated the results of these procedures to the component teams. The Group team instructed component auditors as to the significant areas to be covered, including the relevant risks detailed above and the information to be reported back. The Group team approved the component materialities, as detailed in the table above, having regard to the mix of size and risk profile of the Group across the components.
The scope of the audit work performed was predominately substantive as we placed limited reliance upon the Group’s internal control over financial reporting.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 142 | Financial statements
---|---|---|---
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of BT Group plc continued
What we mean
The extent of the Group audit team’s involvement in component audits.
In working with component auditors, we:
– Held planning calls with component audit teams to discuss the significant areas of the audit relevant to the components;
– Issued Group audit instructions to component auditors on the scope of their work,
– Held risk assessment update discussions with component audit teams before the commencement of the final phases of the audit led by the Group engagement partner and engagement quality control partner;
– Inspected component audit teams’ key work papers (in person and/or using remote technology capabilities) to evaluate the quality of execution of the audits of the components.
The directors are responsible for the other information presented in the Annual Report together with the financial statements. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except as explicitly stated below, any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether, based on our financial statements audit work, the information therein is materially misstated or inconsistent with the financial statements or our audit knowledge.
Our reporting
Based solely on that work we have not identified material misstatements or inconsistencies in the other information.
Our responsibility and reporting
Based solely on our work on the other information described above we report to you as follows:
– we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report and the directors’ report;
– in our opinion the information given in those reports for the financial year is consistent with the financial statements; and
– in our opinion those reports have been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Our responsibility
We are required to form an opinion as to whether the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Our reporting
In our opinion the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Our responsibility
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether there is a material inconsistency between the financial statements and our audit knowledge, and:
– the directors’ statement that they consider that the annual report and financial statements taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s position and performance, business model and strategy;
– the section of the annual report describing the work of the Audit and Risk Committee, including the significant matters that the Audit and Risk Committee considered in relation to the financial statements, and how these issues were addressed; and
– the section of the annual report that describes the review of the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management and internal control systems.
We are also required to review the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Group’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified by the Listing Rules for our review.
Our reporting
Based on those procedures, we have concluded that each of these disclosures is materially consistent with the financial statements and our audit knowledge. We have nothing to report in this respect.
Our responsibility
Under the Companies Act 2006, we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
– adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
– the Parent company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
– certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
– we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Our reporting
We have nothing to report in these respects.
As explained more fully in their statement set out on page 125, the directors are responsible for:
* the preparation of the financial statements including being satisfied that they give a true and fair view;
* such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error;
* assessing the Group and Parent company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern; and
* using the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 143 | Financial statements
---|---|---|---
Auditor’s responsibilities
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue our opinion in an auditor’s report.# H1
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but does not guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. A fuller description of our responsibilities is provided on the FRC’s website at www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. The Company is required to include these financial statements in an annual financial report prepared under Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 4.1.17R and 4.1.18R. This auditor’s report provides no assurance over whether the annual financial report has been prepared in accordance with those requirements.
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members, as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Jonathan Mills
for and on behalf of KPMG LLP,
Statutory Auditor
Chartered Accountants
15 Canada Square
London E14 5GL
15 May 2024
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
144
Financial statements
KPMG LLP’s Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of BT Group plc continued
| Before specificitems | Specific items | Total (‘Adjusted’) | Notes | 2024 £m | 2024 £m | 2024 £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 4, 5 | 20,835 | (38) | 20,797 | ||
| Operating costs | 6 | (17,634) | (949) | (18,583) | ||
| Of which net impairment losses on trade receivables and contract assets | (165) | — | (165) | |||
| Of which goodwill impairment | 13 | — | (488) | (488) | ||
| Operating profit (loss) | 4 | 3,201 | (987) | 2,214 | ||
| Finance expense | 27 | (1,067) | (121) | (1,188) | ||
| Finance income | 181 | — | 181 | |||
| Net finance expense | (886) | (121) | (1,007) | |||
| Share of post tax profit (loss) of associates and joint ventures | 24 | (21) | — | (21) | ||
| Profit (loss) before taxation | 2,294 | (1,108) | 1,186 | |||
| Taxation | 10 | (476) | 145 | (331) | ||
| Profit (loss) for the year | 1,818 | (963) | 855 | |||
| Earnings per share | 11 | |||||
| Basic | 18.5p | (9.8)p | 8.7p | |||
| Diluted | 18.2p | (9.6)p | 8.6p |
Group income statement
Year ended 31 March 2023
| Before specificitems | Specific items | Total (‘Adjusted’) | Notes | 2023 £m | 2023 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 4, 5 | 20,669 | 12 | 20,681 | ||
| Operating costs | 6 | (17,494) | (568) | (18,062) | ||
| Of which net impairment losses on trade receivables and contract assets | (138) | — | (138) | |||
| Of which goodwill impairment | 13 | — | — | — | ||
| Operating profit (loss) | 4 | 3,175 | (556) | 2,619 | ||
| Finance expense | 27 | (889) | (5) | (894) | ||
| Finance income | 63 | — | 63 | |||
| Net finance expense | (826) | (5) | (831) | |||
| Share of post tax profit (loss) of associates and joint ventures | 24 | (59) | — | (59) | ||
| Profit (loss) before taxation | 2,290 | (561) | 1,729 | |||
| Taxation | 10 | (132) | 308 | 176 | ||
| Profit (loss) for the year | 2,158 | (253) | 1,905 | |||
| Earnings per share | 11 | |||||
| Basic | 22.0p | (2.6)p | 19.4p | |||
| Diluted | 21.4p | (2.5)p | 18.9p |
a Specific items are defined and analysed in note 9.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
145
Financial statements
Group income statement
Year ended 31 March 2024
| Notes | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year | 855 | 1,905 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | ||
| Items that will not be reclassified to the income statement | ||
| Remeasurements of the net pension obligation | 19 | (2,444) |
| Tax on pension remeasurements | 10 | 600 |
| Items that have been or may be reclassified to the income statement | ||
| Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | 29 | (66) |
| Fair value movements on assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | 29 | — |
| Movements in relation to cash flow hedges: | ||
| – net fair value gains (losses) | 29 | (642) |
| – recognised in income and expense | 29 | 356 |
| Tax on components of other comprehensive income that have been or may be reclassified | 10, 29 | 78 |
| Share of post tax other comprehensive loss in associates and joint ventures | 24 | (11) |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income for the year, net of tax | (2,129) | |
| Total comprehensive (loss) income for the year | (1,274) |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
146
Financial statements
Group statement of comprehensive income
Year ended 31 March
| Notes | 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | |||
| Intangible assets | 13 | 12,920 | 13,687 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 14 | 22,562 | 21,667 |
| Right-of-use assets | 15 | 3,642 | 3,981 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 28 | 1,020 | 1,397 |
| Investments | 23 | 29 | 29 |
| Joint ventures and associates | 24 | 307 | 359 |
| Trade and other receivables | 16 | 641 | 503 |
| Preference shares in joint ventures | 24 | 451 | 542 |
| Contract assets | 5 | 330 | 369 |
| Retirement benefit surplus | 19 | 70 | 52 |
| Deferred tax assets | 10 | 1,048 | 709 |
| 43,020 | 43,295 | ||
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories | 409 | 349 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 16 | 3,565 | 3,060 |
| Preference shares in joint ventures | 24 | 82 | 13 |
| Contract assets | 5 | 1,410 | 1,565 |
| Assets classified as held for sale | 22 | — | 21 |
| Current tax receivable | 423 | 427 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 28 | 50 | 82 |
| Investments | 23 | 2,366 | 3,548 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 25 | 414 | 392 |
| 8,719 | 9,457 | ||
| Current liabilities | |||
| Loans and other borrowings | 26 | 1,395 | 1,772 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 28 | 94 | 86 |
| Trade and other payables | 17 | 6,327 | 6,564 |
| Contract liabilities | 5 | 906 | 859 |
| Lease liabilities | 15 | 766 | 800 |
| Liabilities classified as held for sale | 22 | — | 4 |
| Current tax liabilities | 92 | 78 | |
| Provisions | 18 | 238 | 229 |
| 9,818 | 10,392 | ||
| Total assets less current liabilities | 41,921 | 42,360 | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Loans and other borrowings | 26 | 17,131 | 16,749 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 28 | 445 | 297 |
| Contract liabilities | 5 | 175 | 193 |
| Lease liabilities | 15 | 4,189 | 4,559 |
| Retirement benefit obligations | 19 | 4,882 | 3,139 |
| Other payables | 17 | 637 | 920 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 10 | 1,533 | 1,620 |
| Provisions | 18 | 411 | 369 |
| 29,403 | 27,846 | ||
| Equity | |||
| Share capital | 499 | 499 | |
| Share premium | 1,051 | 1,051 | |
| Own shares | 20 | (311) | (422) |
| Merger reserve | 998 | 998 | |
| Other reserves | 29 | 716 | 957 |
| Retained earnings | 9,565 | 11,431 | |
| Total equity | 12,518 | 14,514 | |
| 41,921 | 42,360 |
The consolidated financial statements on pages 145 to 221 were approved by the Board of Directors on 15 May 2024 and were signed on its behalf by:
Adam Crozier
Chairman
Allison Kirkby
Chief Executive
Simon Lowth
Chief Financial Officer
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
147
Financial statements
Group balance sheet
At 31 March
| Retained earnings (loss) | Total equity | |
|---|---|---|
| At 1 April 2022 | 12,391 | 15,284 |
| Profit for the year | 1,905 | 1,905 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) – before tax | (2,879) | (1,738) |
| Tax on other comprehensive income (loss) | 732 | 642 |
| Transferred to the income statement | — | (713) |
| Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year | (242) | 96 |
| Dividends to shareholders | (753) | (753) |
| Share-based payments | 80 | 80 |
| Tax on share-based payments | (9) | (9) |
| Net buyback of own shares | (34) | (182) |
| Other movements | (2) | (2) |
| At 31 March 2023 | 11,431 | 14,514 |
| Profit for the year | 855 | 855 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) – before tax | (2,455) | (3,163) |
| Tax on other comprehensive income (loss) | 600 | 678 |
| Transferred to the income statement | — | 356 |
| Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year | (1,000) | (1,274) |
| Dividends to shareholders | (757) | (757) |
| Share-based payments | 71 | 71 |
| Tax on share-based payments | (12) | (12) |
| Net buyback of own shares | (137) | (26) |
| Transfer to realised profit | (33) | — |
| Other movements | 2 | 2 |
| At 31 March 2024 | 9,565 | 12,518 |
a The allotted, called up, and fully paid ordinary share capital of BT Group plc at 31 March 2024 was £499m comprising 9,968,127,681 ordinary shares of 5p each (31 March 2023: £499m comprising 9,968,127,681 ordinary shares of 5p each).
b The share premium account, comprising the premium on allotment of shares, is not available for distribution.
c For further analysis of own shares, see note 20.
d The merger reserve balance at 1 April 2022 includes £998m related to the group reorganisation that occurred in November 2001 and represented the difference between the nominal value of shares in the new parent company, BT Group plc, and the aggregate of the share capital, share premium account and capital redemption reserve of the prior parentcompany, British Telecommunications plc.
e For further analysis of other reserves, see note 29.
f Includes amounts relating to disposal of investments, for further analysis see note 29.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
148
Financial statements
Group statement of changes in equity
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from operating activities | ||
| Profit before taxation | 1,186 | 1,729 |
| Share of post tax loss (profit) of associates and joint ventures | 21 | 59 |
| Net finance expense | 1,007 | 831 |
| Operating profit | 2,214 | 2,619 |
| Other non-cash charges | 76 | 89 |
| (Profit) loss on disposal of businesses | (15) | 157 |
| Loss (profit) on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | 3 | 2 |
| Depreciation and amortisation, including impairment charges | 6 | 5,398 |
| (Increase) decrease in inventories | (60) | (47) |
| Decrease in programme rights | — | 7 |
| (Increase) decrease in trade and other receivables | (843) | (285) |
| Decrease (increase) in contract assets | 157 | (17) |
| (Decrease) increase in trade and other payables | (89) | 232 |
| Increase (decrease) in contract liabilities | 39 | 41 |
| (Decrease) increase in other liabilities | (850) | (919) |
| (Decrease) increase in provisions | (18) | (109) |
| Cash generated from operations | 6,012 | 6,588 |
| Income taxes (paid) refunded | (59) | 136 |
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 5,953 | 6,724 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | ||
| Interest received | 140 | 41 |
| Dividends received from joint ventures, associates and | ||
| ## Financial statements | ||
| ### Group cash flow statement | ||
| Year ended 31 March |
| FY24 | FY23 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow from investing activities | |||
| Proceeds on disposal of businesses | 81 | 29 | |
| Proceeds on disposal of current financial assets | 12,389 | 11,868 | |
| Purchases of current financial assets | (11,216) | (12,705) | |
| Net (purchase) disposal of non-current asset investments | — | (5) | |
| Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | 2 | — | |
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | (4,969) | (5,307) | |
| Prepayment for forward sale of copper | 105 | — | |
| Decrease (increase) in amounts owed by joint ventures | 117 | (265) | |
| Settlement of minimum guarantee liability with sports joint venture | 17 | (211) | |
| Net cash outflow from investing activities | (3,542) | (6,396) | |
| Cash flow from financing activities | |||
| Equity dividends paid | (759) | (751) | |
| Interest paid | (865) | (709) | |
| Repayment of borrowings | (1,676) | (513) | |
| Proceeds from bank loans and bonds | 2,242 | 2,203 | |
| Payment of lease liabilities | (748) | (727) | |
| Cash flows from collateral (paid) received | (532) | (17) | |
| Changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries | (13) | — | |
| Proceeds from exercise of employee share options | 57 | 5 | |
| Repurchase of ordinary share capital | (133) | (138) | |
| Increase (decrease) in amounts owed to joint ventures | 26 | 11 | |
| Net cash outflow from financing activities | (2,428) | (636) | |
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (17) | (308) | |
| Opening cash and cash equivalents | 381 | 692 | |
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (17) | (308) | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes | (8) | (3) | |
| Closing cash and cash equivalents | 356 | 381 |
a FY24 net profit comprises £25m profit on divestments completing in the year less £10m net transaction costs in relation to BT Sport disposal, see note 22.
b Depreciation and amortisation includes goodwill impairment charges of £488m (FY23: £nil), see note 13 for further details.
c Includes pension deficit payments of £823m (FY23: £994m).
d Primarily consists of investment in and redemption of amounts held in liquidity funds.
e Property, plant and equipment, engineering stores and software additions of £4,880m (FY23: £5,056m) (see note 4) and capital accruals movements of £89m (FY23: £251m).
f In FY24 we received an upfront prepayment of £105m from entering into a forward agreement to sell copper granules created from surplus copper cables which are currently recognised within property, plant and equipment (note 14). As this is expected to be the only cash flow that occurs as part of this transaction the cash receipt has been included as a separate line within cash flows from investing activities. See note 26 for further details.
g Repayment of borrowings includes the impact of hedging.
h Cash flows relating to cash collateral held in respect of derivative financial assets with certain counterparties, see note 28 for further details.
i Net of bank overdrafts of £58m (FY23: £11m).
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards and with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. The consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis. This assessment is consistent with the assessment of our viability, as set out on pages 81 to 82, which has been based on the Company’s strategy, balance sheet and financing position, including our £2.1bn undrawn committed borrowing facility which matures in March 2027, and the potential impact of ‘Our principal risks and uncertainties’ (pages 63 to 70); and which estimates the financial impact of a severe but plausible outcome for each risk, both individually, in combination and through stochastic risk modelling. This stress testing confirmed that existing projected cash flows and cash management activities provide us with adequate headroom over the going concern assessment period. Having assessed the principal and emerging risks, the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting when preparing the group and parent company financial statements. This assessment covers the period to May 2025, which is consistent with the FRC guidance. When reaching this conclusion, the directors took into account the group’s and parent company’s overall financial position (including trading results and ability to repay term debt as it matures without recourse to refinancing) and the exposure to principal risks. In preparing the financial statements, the directors have considered the impact of climate change, particularly in the context of the risks identified in the TCFD disclosure on pages 71 to 80 this year. There has been no material impact identified in respect of the judgements and estimates reported in these financial statements. The following impacts were considered:
– Low carbon fleet – see note 14
These financial statements consolidate BT Group plc, the parent company, and its subsidiaries (together the ‘group’, ‘us’, ‘we’ or ‘our’). The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis, except for certain financial and equity instruments that have been measured at fair value. The consolidated financial statements are presented in sterling, the functional currency of BT Group plc. These financial statements cover the financial year from 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024 (‘FY24’), with comparative figures for the financial year from 1 April 2022 to 31 March 2023 (‘FY23’).
The following amended standards were effective during the year, none of which had a material impact on the financial statements of the group:
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
BT adopted IFRS 17 with retrospective application on 1 April 2023. The standard establishes principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of insurance contracts. The measurement method for insurance contracts required by IFRS 17 is a probability weighted discounted cash flow model, including a best estimate and an adjustment for non-financial risk calculated for groups of similar contracts. IFRS 17 primarily impacts insurance entities, however, as it applies to individual contracts it is possible that non-insurers could issue contracts that are in scope of the standard such as product breakdown contracts or warranties. We have assessed the impact of the standard on the group, and concluded that its impact is not material. Contracts in scope of the standard entered into by the group are restricted to intragroup insurance arrangements; the group does not issue external insurance contracts.
Disclosure of Accounting Policies (Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2)
These amendments require the disclosure of ‘material’ rather than ‘significant’ accounting policies. The amendments have not resulted in any changes to accounting policies disclosures made in these financial statements.
International Tax Reform – Pillar Two Model Rules (Amendments to IAS 12 Income Taxes)
The IASB amended the scope of IAS 12 to introduce a temporary mandatory exception from deferred tax accounting for top-up tax arising from the implementation of the OECD Pillar Two model rules. This was endorsed in the UK in July 2023 and applies to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. The group applies the exception to recognising and disclosing information about deferred tax assets and liabilities related to Pillar Two income taxes, as provided in the amendments to IAS 12 issued in May 2023.
Other
The following changes have not had a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements:
– Definition of Accounting Estimate (Amendments to IAS 8)
– Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction (Amendments to IAS 12)
The IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) periodically issues agenda decisions which explain and clarify how to apply the principles and requirements of IFRS. Agenda decisions are authoritative and may require the group to revise accounting policies or practice to align with the interpretations set out in the decision. We regularly review IFRIC updates and assess the impact of agenda decisions. No agenda decisions finalised during FY24 have been assessed as having a significant impact on the group.
The following new or amended standards and interpretations are applicable in future periods and are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements:
Supplier Finance Arrangements (Amendments to IAS 7 and IFRS 7)
The amendments will apply to the group from FY25 onwards and require new disclosures relating to supplier finance arrangements that assist in assessing their effects on liabilities, cash flows and exposure to liquidity risk. We participate in supply chain financing arrangements which the amendments will apply to, see note 17. We will include the required disclosures in the FY25 financial statements.
Other
The following are not expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements:
– Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current (Amendments to IAS 1)
– Non-current Liabilities with Covenants (Amendments to IAS 1)
– Lease Liability in a Sale and Leaseback (Amendments to IFRS 16)
– Lack of Exchangeability (Amendments to IAS 21)
During FY24 we changed the methodology used to allocate certain internal costs and our Business CFU began reporting as a single unit.# 1. Basis of preparation
From 1 April 2023 we have revised the methodology used to allocate shared Network, Digital and support function costs across our units to more closely align the recharges received by each unit to their actual consumption and establish clearer driver-focused allocation of cost, harmonise principles for pricing and profitability, and support greater unit cost ownership and management and decision making. This represents an accounting policy change and in line with the requirements of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors we have re-presented FY23 comparatives to enable comparability across periods.
As disclosed in the FY23 financial statements, the Enterprise and Global CFUs have been combined into a single CFU, Business, which began reporting as a single unit from 1 April 2023. In line with the requirements of IFRS 8 Operating Segments, we have re-presented FY23 comparatives to reflect the combined unit.
These changes have resulted in re-presentation of prior year comparatives. Changes affect segmental disclosures only and have no impact on the overall reported group financial results. The following disclosures are impacted by the creation of the Business unit only. Re-presentation of prior year comparatives is limited to the combination of the balances previously reported in respect of the Enterprise and Global units, with no further adjustments:
Note 4 Segment information is also impacted by changes to the allocation of shared costs. Re-presentation of comparatives has involved adjustments to reallocate internal costs to report on a like-for-like basis with FY24 and to remove internal trading between the Enterprise and Global units. Note 32 presents a bridge between previously published FY23 financial information and comparatives presented in these disclosures:
Also presented is a bridge in respect of the CFU normalised free cash flow comparatives which are re-presented in the Additional information on page 231.
Our income statement and segmental analysis separately identify trading results on an adjusted basis, being before specific items. The directors believe that presentation of the group’s results in this way is relevant to an understanding of the group’s financial performance as specific items are those that in management’s judgement need to be disclosed by virtue of their size, nature or incidence. This presentation is consistent with the way that financial performance is measured by management and reported to the Board and the Executive Committee and assists in providing an additional analysis of our reporting of trading results. Specific items may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
In determining whether an event or transaction is specific, management considers quantitative as well as qualitative factors. Examples of charges or credits meeting the above definition and which have been presented as specific items in the current and/or prior years include significant business restructuring programmes such as the current group-wide cost transformation and modernisation programme, acquisitions and disposals of businesses and investments, impairment of goodwill, charges or credits relating to retrospective regulatory matters, property rationalisation programmes, historical property-related provisions, significant out-of-period contract settlements, net interest on our pension obligation, and the impact of remeasuring deferred tax balances. In the event that items meet the criteria, which are applied consistently from year to year, they are treated as specific items. Any releases to provisions originally booked as a specific item are also classified as specific. Conversely, when a reversal occurs in relation to a prior year item not classified as specific, the reversal is not classified as specific in the current year. Movements relating to the sports joint venture (Sports JV) with Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), such as fair value gains or losses on the A and C preference shares or impairment charges on the equity-accounted investment are classified as specific. Refer to note 24 for further detail. Specific items for the current and prior year are disclosed in note 9.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of accounting estimates and assumptions. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying our accounting policies. We continually evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgements based on available information and experience. As the use of estimates is inherent in financial reporting, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Our critical accounting estimates are those estimates that carry a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. We also make other key estimates when preparing the financial statements, which, while not meeting the definition of a critical estimate, involve a higher degree of complexity and can reasonably be expected to be of relevance to a user of the financial statements. Management has discussed its critical and other key accounting estimates and associated disclosures with the Audit and Risk Committee.
Significant judgements are those made by management in applying our material accounting policies that have a material impact on the amounts presented in the financial statements. We may exercise significant judgement in our critical and key accounting estimates. Our critical and key accounting estimates and significant judgements are described in the following notes to the financial statements. They can be identified by the following symbol .
| Note | Critical estimate | Key estimate | Significant judgement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Estimate of customer refund liability | ü | |
| 10 | Current and deferred income tax | ü | ü |
| 13 | Goodwill impairment | ü | ü |
| 14 | Determining the point of sale of BT Tower | ü | |
| 15 | Reasonable certainty and determination of lease terms | ü | ü |
| 18 | Identifying contingent liabilities | ü | |
| 18 | Provisions | ü | ü |
| 19 | Valuation of pension assets and liabilities | ü | ü |
| 24 | Valuation of investment in A preference shares in Sports joint venture | ü |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 151
The material accounting policies applied in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are set out below. Other material accounting policies applicable to a particular area are disclosed in the most relevant note. They can be identified by the following symbol . We have applied all policies consistently to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
The group financial statements consolidate the financial statements of BT Group plc and its subsidiaries, and include its share of the results of associates and joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. The group recognises its direct rights to (and its share of) jointly held assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of joint operations under the appropriate headings in the consolidated financial statements. All business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method regardless of whether equity instruments or other assets are acquired.
A subsidiary is an entity that is controlled by another entity, known as the parent or investor. An investor controls an investee when the investor is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. Non-controlling interests in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries, which consist of the amounts of those interests at the date of the original business combination and non-controlling share of changes in equity since the date of the combination, are not material to the group’s financial statements.
The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are consolidated from and up to the date of change of control. Where necessary, accounting policies of subsidiaries have been aligned with the policies adopted by the group. All intra-group transactions including any gains or losses, balances, income or expenses are eliminated on consolidation.
When the group loses control of a subsidiary, the profit or loss on disposal is calculated as the difference between (i) the aggregate of the fair value of the consideration received and the fair value of any retained interest and (ii) the previous carrying amount of the assets (including goodwill), and liabilities of the subsidiary and any non-controlling interests. The profit or loss on disposal is recognised as a specific item.
Associates are those entities in which the group has significant influence, but not control or joint control, over the financial and operating policies. A joint venture is an arrangement in which the group has joint control, whereby the group has rights to the net assets of the arrangement, rather than rights to its assets and obligations for its liabilities. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the activities that significantly affect the returns of the arrangement require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. Interests in associates and joint ventures are initially recognised at cost (including transaction costs) except where they relate to a retained non-controlling interest in a former subsidiary, which is initially recognised at a deemed cost being the fair value of the retained interest.Subsequent to initial recognition, the consolidated financial statements include the group’s share of the profit or loss and other comprehensive income of equity- accounted investees, until the date on which significant influence or joint control ceases.
Inventories
Network maintenance equipment and equipment to be sold to customers are stated at the lower of cost or net realisable value, taking into account expected revenue from the sale of packages comprising a mobile handset and a subscription. Cost corresponds to purchase or production cost determined by either the first in first out (FIFO) or average cost method.
Government grants
Government grants are recognised when there is reasonable assurance that the conditions associated with the grants have been complied with and the grants will be received. Grants for the purchase or production of property, plant and equipment are deducted from the cost of the related assets and reduce future depreciation expense accordingly. Grants for the reimbursement of operating expenditure are deducted from the related category of costs in the income statement. Estimates and judgements applied in accounting for government grants received in respect of Building Digital UK (BDUK) and other rural superfast broadband contracts are described in note 14. Once a government grant is recognised, any related deferred income is treated in accordance with IAS 20 ‘Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance’.
Foreign currencies
The consolidated financial statements are presented in sterling, which is also the company’s functional currency. Each group entity determines its own functional currency. Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of transactions and the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at period end exchange rates are recognised in the income statement line which most appropriately reflects the nature of the item or transaction. On consolidation, assets and liabilities of foreign undertakings are translated into the group’s presentation currency at year end exchange rates. The results of foreign undertakings are translated into sterling at the rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Foreign exchange differences arising on the retranslation of foreign undertakings are recognised directly in a separate component of equity, the translation reserve. There is no material exposure to companies operating in hyperinflationary economies. In the event of the disposal of an undertaking with assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency, the cumulative translation difference associated with the undertaking in the translation reserve is charged or credited to the gain or loss on disposal recognised in the income statement.
Research and development
Research expenditure is recognised in the income statement in the period in which it is incurred. Development expenditure, including the cost of internally developed software, is recognised in the income statement in the period in which it is incurred unless it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the group from the asset being developed, the cost of the asset can be reliably measured and technical feasibility can be demonstrated, in which case it is capitalised as an intangible asset on the balance sheet. Capitalisation ceases when the asset being developed is ready for use. Research and development costs include direct and indirect labour, materials and directly attributable overheads.
Termination benefits
Termination benefits (leaver costs) are payable when employment is terminated before the normal retirement date, or when an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. We recognise termination benefits when they are demonstrably committed to the affected employees leaving the group.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 152
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
Our operating segments are reported based on financial information provided to the Executive Committee, which is the key management committee and represents the ‘chief operating decision maker’. Our organisational structure reflects the different customer groups to which we provide communications products and services via our customer-facing units (CFUs). The CFUs are our reportable segments and generate substantially all of our revenue. During the year to 31 March 2024 the group had three CFUs: Consumer, Business and Openreach. Business was formed from the merger of the Global and Enterprise units during FY23 and has been monitored by the Executive Committee on a consolidated basis since 1 April 2023. The CFUs are supported by technology units (TUs) comprising Digital and Networks; and corporate units (CUs) including procurement and property management. TUs and CUs are not reportable segments as they did not meet the quantitative thresholds as set out in IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’ for any of the years presented. We aggregate the remaining operations and include them in the ‘Other’ category to reconcile to the consolidated results of the group. The ‘Other’ category includes unallocated TU costs and our CUs.
Provisions for the settlement of significant legal, commercial and regulatory disputes, which are negotiated at a group level, are initially recorded in the ‘Other’ segment. On resolution of the dispute, the full impact is recognised in the results of the relevant CFU and offset in the group results through the utilisation of the provision previously charged to the ‘Other’ segment. Settlements which are particularly significant or cover more than one financial year may fall within the definition of specific items as detailed in note 9, in which case they are not reflecting in the results of the reportable segment in line with how they are reported to the Executive Committee.
The costs incurred by TUs and CUs are recharged to the CFUs to reflect the services provided to them. Depreciation and amortisation incurred by TUs in relation to the networks and systems they manage and operate on behalf of the CFUs is allocated to the CFUs based on their respective utilisation. Capital expenditure incurred by TUs for specific projects undertaken on behalf of the CFUs is allocated based on the value of the directly attributable expenditure incurred. Where projects are not directly attributable to a particular CFU, capital expenditure is allocated among them based on the proportion of estimated future economic benefits. Specific items are detailed in note 9 and are not allocated to the reportable segments as this reflects how they are reported to the Executive Committee.
Finance expense and income are not allocated to the reportable segments, as the central treasury function manages this activity, together with the overall net debt position of the group.
Performance of each reportable segment is measured based on adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as the group profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures. Adjusted EBITDA is considered to be a useful measure of the operating performance of the CFUs because it approximates the underlying operating cash flow by eliminating depreciation and amortisation and also provides a meaningful analysis of trading performance by excluding specific items, which are disclosed separately by virtue of their size, nature or incidence. We also increasingly track adjusted operating profit which reflects the growing depreciation expense arising from our elevated network investment.
Our revenue recognition policy is set out in note 5.
Most of our internal trading relates to Openreach and arises on rentals, and any associated connection or migration charges, of the UK access lines and other network products to the other CFUs, including the use of BT Ireland’s network. This occurs both directly, and also indirectly, through TUs which are included within the ‘Other’ segment. Business internal revenue arises from Consumer for mobile Ethernet access and TUs for transmission planning services. Intra-group revenue generated from the sale of regulated products and services is based on market price. Intra-group revenue from the sale of other products and services is agreed between the relevant CFUs and therefore the profitability of CFUs may be impacted by transfer pricing levels.
The UK is our country of domicile and is where we generate the majority of our revenue from external UK customers. The geographic analysis of revenue is based on the country in which the customer is invoiced. The geographic analysis of non-current assets, which excludes derivative financial instruments, investments, preference shares in joint ventures, retirement benefit schemes in surplus and deferred tax assets, is based on the location of the assets.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 153
Financial statements
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | ||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Segment revenue | 9,833 | 8,128 | 6,077 | 16 |
| Internal revenue | (47) | (71) | (3,101) | — |
| Adjusted a revenue from external customers | 9,786 | 8,057 | 2,976 | 16 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 2,672 | 1,630 | 3,827 | (29) |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (1,738) | (984) | (2,052) | (125) |
| Adjusted a operating profit (loss) | 934 | 646 | 1,775 | (154) |
| Specific operating profit (loss) – see note 9 | (987) | |||
| Operating profit | 2,214 | |||
| Net finance expense | (1,007) | |||
| Share of post tax (loss) profit of associates and joint ventures | (21) | |||
| Profit before tax | 1,186 |
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented d ) | ||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Segment revenue | 9,737 | 8,258 | 5,675 | 27 |
| Internal revenue | (57) | (81) | (2,890) | — |
| Adjusted a revenue from external customers | 9,680 | 8,177 | 2,785 | 27 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 2,469 | 1,945 | 3,510 | 4 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (1,603) | (1,047) | (1,965) | (138) |
| Adjusted a operating profit (loss) | 866 | 898 | 1,545 | (134) |
| Specific operating profit (loss) – see note 9 | (556) | |||
| Operating profit | 2,619 | |||
| Net finance expense | (831) | |||
| Share of post tax (loss) profit of associates and joint ventures | (59) | |||
| Profit before tax | 1,729 |
a Before specific items.
b Adjusted EBITDA is defined as profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures.
c Net finance expense includes specific item expense of £121m (FY23: £5m). See note 9.
d Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit and a change in the methodology used to allocate shared central costs. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32.
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | ||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Internal revenue recorded by Consumer Business | — | 46 | — | 1 |
| Openreach | 23 | — | — | 48 |
| Total | 2,044 | 1,043 | — | 14 |
| 2,067 | 1,089 | — | 63 |
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) | ||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Internal revenue recorded by Consumer Business | — | 56 | — | 1 |
| Openreach | 26 | — | — | 55 |
| Total | 1,805 | 1,072 | — | 13 |
| 1,831 | 1,128 | — | 69 |
a Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 154
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | ||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Intangible assets a | 439 | 361 | 135 | 3 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 736 | 414 | 2,710 | 82 |
| Capital expenditure | 1,175 | 775 | 2,845 | 85 |
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented c ) | ||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Intangible assets a | 552 | 361 | 101 | 4 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 669 | 525 | 2,746 | 98 |
| Capital expenditure | 1,221 | 886 | 2,847 | 102 |
a Additions to intangible assets as presented in note 13.
b Additions to property, plant and equipment as presented in note 14, inclusive of movement on engineering stores.
c Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing units. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | £m | £m |
| UK | 18,450 | 18,154 |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa, excluding the UK | 1,303 | 1,372 |
| Americas | 617 | 684 |
| Asia Pacific | 465 | 459 |
| Adjusted a revenue | 20,835 | 20,669 |
a Before specific items.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
| UK | 39,370 | 39,387 |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa, excluding the UK | 634 | 740 |
| Americas | 251 | 283 |
| Asia Pacific | 147 | 156 |
| Non-current assets a | 40,402 | 40,566 |
a Comprising the following balances presented in the group balance sheet: intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, right-of-use assets, joint ventures and associates, trade and other receivables and contract assets.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 155
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
Most revenue recognised by the group is in scope of IFRS 15, excluding Openreach where most revenue is in scope of IFRS 16. The revenue recognition policy for both is set out below.
On inception of the contract we identify a “performance obligation” for each of the distinct goods or services we have promised to provide to the customer. The consideration specified in the contract with the customer is allocated to each performance obligation identified based on their relative standalone selling prices, and is recognised as revenue as they are satisfied.
The table below summarises the performance obligations we have identified for our major service lines and provides information on the timing of when they are satisfied and the related revenue recognition policy. Also detailed in this note is revenue expected to be recognised in future periods for contracts in place at 31 March 2024 that contain unsatisfied performance obligations.
| Service line | Performance obligations | Revenue recognition policy * * *
BT Group plc Annual Report 156
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
5.
| Information and Provision of networked IT services, managed communications services, and arrangements to design and build technology (ICT) software solutions. Performance obligations are identified for each distinct service or deliverable for which the customer has contracted, and are considered to be satisfied over the time period that we deliver these services or deliverables. Commitments to provide hardware to customers that are distinct from the other promises are considered to be satisfied at the point in time that control passes to the customer. | Revenue for services is recognised over time using a measure of progress that appropriately reflects the pattern by which the performance obligation is satisfied. For time and materials contracts, revenue is recognised as the service is received by the customer. Where performance obligations exist for the provision of hardware, revenue is recognised at the point in time that the customer obtains control of the promised asset. For long-term fixed price contracts revenue recognition will typically be based on the satisfaction of performance obligations in respect of the achievement of contract milestones and customer acceptance, which is the best measure of progress towards the completion of the performance obligation. |
| :---
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented d) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Segment revenue | 9,833 | 8,128 | 6,077 |
| Internal revenue | (47) | (71) | (3,101) |
| Adjusted revenue from external customers | 9,786 | 8,057 | 2,976 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 2,672 | 1,630 | 3,827 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (1,738) | (984) | (2,052) |
| Adjusted operating profit (loss) | 934 | 646 | 1,775 |
| Specific operating profit (loss) – see note 9 | |||
| Operating profit | |||
| Net finance expense | |||
| Share of post tax (loss) profit of associates and joint ventures | |||
| Profit before tax |
| Total | |
|---|---|
| £m | |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | |
| Segment revenue | 24,054 |
| Internal revenue | (3,219) |
| Adjusted revenue from external customers | 20,835 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 8,100 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (4,899) |
| Adjusted operating profit (loss) | 3,201 |
| Specific operating profit (loss) – see note 9 | (987) |
| Operating profit | 2,214 |
| Net finance expense | (1,007) |
| Share of post tax (loss) profit of associates and joint ventures | (21) |
| Profit before tax | 1,186 |
| Total | |
|---|---|
| £m | |
| Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented d) | |
| Segment revenue | 23,697 |
| Internal revenue | (3,028) |
| Adjusted revenue from external customers | 20,669 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 7,928 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (4,753) |
| Adjusted operating profit (loss) | 3,175 |
| Specific operating profit (loss) – see note 9 | (556) |
| Operating profit | 2,619 |
| Net finance expense | (831) |
| Share of post tax (loss) profit of associates and joint ventures | (59) |
| Profit before tax | 1,729 |
a Before specific items.
b Adjusted EBITDA is defined as profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures.
c Net finance expense includes specific item expense of £121m (FY23: £5m). See note 9.
d Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit and a change in the methodology used to allocate shared central costs. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32.
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Internal revenue recorded by Consumer Business | — | 46 | — |
| Openreach | 23 | — | — |
| Total | 2,044 | 1,043 | — |
| Total | |
|---|---|
| £m | |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | |
| Internal revenue recorded by Consumer Business | 47 |
| Openreach | 71 |
| Total | 3,101 |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Internal revenue recorded by Consumer Business | 1 | 48 | — |
| Openreach | — | 55 | — |
| Total | 14 |
| Total | |
|---|---|
| £m | |
| Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) | |
| Internal revenue recorded by Consumer Business | 57 |
| Openreach | 81 |
| Total | 2,890 |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Total | 3,219 |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Internal cost recorded by Consumer Business | — | 56 | — |
| Openreach | 26 | — | — |
| Total | 1,805 | 1,072 | — |
| Total | |
|---|---|
| £m | |
| Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) | |
| Internal cost recorded by Consumer Business | 57 |
| Openreach | 81 |
| Total | 2,890 |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Total | 3,028 |
a Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 154
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented c ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Intangible assets a | 439 | 361 | 135 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 736 | 414 | 2,710 |
| Capital expenditure | 1,175 | 775 | 2,845 |
| Total | |
|---|---|
| £m | |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | |
| Intangible assets a | 938 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 3,942 |
| Capital expenditure | 4,880 |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented c ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Intangible assets a | 3 | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 82 | ||
| Capital expenditure | 85 |
| Total | |
|---|---|
| £m | |
| Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented c ) | |
| Intangible assets a | 1,018 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 4,038 |
| Capital expenditure | 5,056 |
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented c ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | |
| Intangible assets a | 4 | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 98 | ||
| Capital expenditure | 102 |
a Additions to intangible assets as presented in note 13.
b Additions to property, plant and equipment as presented in note 14, inclusive of movement on engineering stores.
c Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing units. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | £m | £m |
| UK | 18,450 | 18,154 |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa, excluding the UK | 1,303 | 1,372 |
| Americas | 617 | 684 |
| Asia Pacific | 465 | 459 |
| Adjusted a revenue | 20,835 | 20,669 |
a Before specific items.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
| UK | 39,370 | 39,387 |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa, excluding the UK | 634 | 740 |
| Americas | 251 | 283 |
| Asia Pacific | 147 | 156 |
| Non-current assets a | 40,402 | 40,566 |
a Comprising the following balances presented in the group balance sheet: intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, right-of-use assets, joint ventures and associates, trade and other receivables and contract assets.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 155
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
Most revenue recognised by the group is in scope of IFRS 15, excluding Openreach where most revenue is in scope of IFRS 16. The revenue recognition policy for both is set out below.
On inception of the contract we identify a “performance obligation” for each of the distinct goods or services we have promised to provide to the customer. The consideration specified in the contract with the customer is allocated to each performance obligation identified based on their relative standalone selling prices, and is recognised as revenue as they are satisfied.
The table below summarises the performance obligations we have identified for our major service lines and provides information on the timing of when they are satisfied and the related revenue recognition policy. Also detailed in this note is revenue expected to be recognised in future periods for contracts in place at 31 March 2024 that contain unsatisfied performance obligations.
| Service line | Performance obligations | Revenue recognition policy
Consumer Business Openreach Other Total Year ended 31 March 2024 £m £m £m £m £m Segment revenue 9,833 8,128 6,077 16 24,054 Internal revenue (47) (71) (3,101) — (3,219) Adjusted a revenue from external customers 9,786 8,057 2,976 16 20,835 Adjusted EBITDA 2,672 1,630 3,827 (29) 8,100 Depreciation and amortisation (1,738) (984) (2,052) (125) (4,899) Adjusted a operating profit (loss) 934 646 1,775 (154) 3,201 Specific operating profit (loss) – see note 9 (987) Operating profit 2,214 Net finance expense (1,007) Share of post tax (loss) profit of associates and joint ventures (21) Profit before tax 1,186 b a c Consumer Business Openreach Other Total Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented d ) £m £m £m £m £m Segment revenue 9,737 8,258 5,675 27 23,697 Internal revenue (57) (81) (2,890) — (3,028) Adjusted a revenue from external customers 9,680 8,177 2,785 27 20,669 Adjusted EBITDA 2,469 1,945 3,510 4 7,928 Depreciation and amortisation (1,603) (1,047) (1,965) (138) (4,753) Adjusted a operating profit (loss) 866 898 1,545 (134) 3,175 Specific operating profit (loss) – see note 9 (556) Operating profit 2,619 Net finance expense (831) Share of post tax (loss) profit of associates and joint ventures (59) Profit before tax 1,729 b a c a Before specific items. b Adjusted EBITDA is defined as profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures. c Net finance expense includes specific item expense of £121m (FY23: £5m). See note 9. d Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit and a change in the methodology used to allocate shared central costs. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32. Internal revenue and costs Internal cost recorded by Consumer Business Openreach Other Total Year ended 31 March 2024 £m £m £m £m £m Internal revenue recorded by Consumer — 46 — 1 47 Business 23 — — 48 71 Openreach 2,044 1,043 — 14 3,101 Total 2,067 1,089 — 63 3,219 Internal cost recorded by Consumer Business Openreach Other Total Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented a ) £m £m £m £m £m Internal revenue recorded by Consumer — 56 — 1 57 Business 26 — — 55 81 Openreach 1,805 1,072 — 13 2,890 Total 1,831 1,128 — 69 3,028 a Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32. BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 154 Financial statements Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued 4. Segment information continued Capital expenditure Consumer Business Openreach Other Total Year ended 31 March 2024 £m £m £m £m £m Intangible assets a 439 361 135 3 938 Property, plant and equipment 736 414 2,710 82 3,942 Capital expenditure 1,175 775 2,845 85 4,880 b Consumer Business Openreach Other Total Year ended 31 March 2023 (re-presented c ) £m £m £m £m £m Intangible assets a 552 361 101 4 1,018 Property, plant and equipment 669 525 2,746 98 4,038 Capital expenditure 1,221 886 2,847 102 5,056 b a Additions to intangible assets as presented in note 13. b Additions to property, plant and equipment as presented in note 14, inclusive of movement on engineering stores. c Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing units. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32. Geographic segmentation Revenue from external customers 2024 2023 Year ended 31 March £m £m UK 18,450 18,154 Europe, Middle East and Africa, excluding the UK 1,303 1,372 Americas 617 684 Asia Pacific 465 459 Adjusted a revenue 20,835 20,669 a Before specific items. Non-current assets 2024 2023 At 31 March £m £m UK 39,370 39,387 Europe, Middle East and Africa, excluding the UK 634 740 Americas 251 283 Asia Pacific 147 156 Non-current assets a 40,402 40,566 a Comprising the following balances presented in the group balance sheet: intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, right-of-use assets, joint ventures and associates, trade and other receivables and contract assets. BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 155 Financial statements 4. Segment information continued Material accounting policies that apply to revenue Revenue from contracts with customers in scope of IFRS 15 Most revenue recognised by the group is in scope of IFRS 15, excluding Openreach where most revenue is in scope of IFRS 16. The revenue recognition policy for both is set out below. On inception of the contract we identify a “performance obligation” for each of the distinct goods or services we have promised to provide to the customer. The consideration specified in the contract with the customer is allocated to each performance obligation identified based on their relative standalone selling prices, and is recognised as revenue as they are satisfied. The table below summarises the performance obligations we have identified for our major service lines and provides information on the timing of when they are satisfied and the related revenue recognition policy. Also detailed in this note is revenue expected to be recognised in future periods for contracts in place at 31 March 2024 that contain unsatisfied performance obligations. Service line Performance obligations Revenue recognition policy Information and Provision of networked IT services, managed network Revenue for services is recognised over time using a communications services, and arrangements to design and build measure of progress that appropriately reflects the technology (ICT) software solutions. Performance obligations are pattern by which the performance obligation is and managed identified for each distinct service or deliverable for satisfied. For time and materials contracts, revenue is networks which the customer has contracted, and are recognised as the service is received by the customer. considered to be satisfied over the time period that we Where performance obligations exist for the provision deliver these services or deliverables. Commitments to of hardware, revenue is recognised at the point in time provide hardware to customers that are distinct from that the customer obtains control of the promised the other promises are considered to be satisfied at the asset. For long-term fixed price contracts revenue point in time that control passes to the customer. recognition will typically be based on the satisfaction of performance obligations in respect of the achievement of contract milestones and customer acceptance, which is the best measure of progress towards the completion of the performance obligation. Fixed access Provision of broadband, TV and fixed telephony Fixed subscription charges are recognised as revenue subscriptions services including national and international calls, on a straight-line basis over the period that the connections, line rental and calling features. services are provided. Upfront charges for non-distinct Performance obligations exist for each ongoing service connection and installation services are deferred as provided to the customer and are satisfied over the contract liabilities and are recognised as revenue over period that the services are provided. Installation the same period. Variable charges such as call charges services are recognised as distinct performance are recognised when the related services are delivered. obligations if their relationship with the other services Where installation activities are distinct performance in the contract is purely functional. These are satisfied obligations, revenue is recognised at the point in time when the customer benefits from the service. that the installation is completed. Connection services are not distinct performance obligations and are therefore combined with the associated service performance obligation. Mobile Provision of mobile postpaid and prepaid services, Subscription fees, consisting primarily of monthly charges subscriptions including voice minutes, SMS and data services. for access to internet or voice and data services, Performance obligations exist for each ongoing service are recognised as the service is provided. One-off provided to the customer and are satisfied over the services such as calls outside of plan and excess data period that the services are provided. usage are recognised when the service is used. Equipment and Provision of equipment and other services, including Revenue from equipment sales is recognised at the other services mobile phone handsets and hardware such as set-top point in time that control passes to the customer. boxes and broadband routers provided as part of Where payment is not received in full at the time of the customer contracts. Performance obligations are the sale, such as with equipment provided as part of satisfied at the point in time that control passes to the mobile and fixed access subscriptions, contract assets customer. For other services, performance obligations are recognised for the amount due from the customer are identified based on the distinct goods and services that will be recovered over the contract period. we have committed to provide. Revenue to be recognised is calculated by reference to the relative standalone selling price of the equipment. For other services, revenue is recognised when the related performance obligations are satisfied, which could be over time, in line with contract milestones, or at a point in time depending on the nature of the service. BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 156 Financial statements Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued 5. |
| | | | |# Revenue
We recognise revenue based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation. Determining the standalone selling price often requires judgement and may be derived from regulated prices, list prices, a cost-plus derived price or the price of similar products when sold on a standalone basis by BT or a competitor. In some cases it may be appropriate to use the contract price when this represents a bespoke price that would be the same for a similar customer in a similar circumstance.
The fixed access and mobile subscription arrangements sold by our Consumer business are typically payable in advance, with any variable or one-off charges billed in arrears. Contracts are largely inflation-linked with price increases recognised when effective. Payment is received immediately for direct sales of equipment to customers. Where equipment is provided to customers under mobile and fixed access subscription arrangements, payment for the equipment is received over the course of the contract term. For sales by our enterprise businesses, invoices are issued in line with contractual terms. Payments received in advance are recognised as contract liabilities; amounts billed in arrears are recognised as contract assets.
We adopt variable consideration to allocate the transaction price to take account of the likelihood of the customer upgrading to a new handset during the contract term. Consideration is constrained to a period shorter than the contract term and is allocated to the handset and airtime based on relative standalone selling price. Certain Business long term contracts offer rebates to our customers. Where this is the case we make an estimate of variable consideration at the outset of the contract based on assumed volumes. These rebates are normally settled monthly against service revenues.
We are applying the practical expedient to recognise revenue “as-invoiced” for certain fixed access and mobile subscription services revenues. Where we have a right to invoice at an amount that directly corresponds with performance to date, we recognise revenue at that amount. We have also adopted the practical expedient not to calculate the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied for these contracts.
We do not have any material obligations in respect of returns, refunds or warranties. Where we act as an agent in a transaction, such as insurance services offered, we recognise commission net of directly attributable costs.
We exercise judgement in assessing whether the initial set-up, transition and transformation phases of long-term contracts are distinct from the other services to be delivered under the contract and therefore represent distinct performance obligations. This determines whether revenue is recognised in the early stages of the contract, or deferred until delivery of the other services promised in the contract begins.
We recognise immediately the entire estimated loss for a contract when we have evidence that the contract is unprofitable. If these estimates indicate that any contract will be less profitable than previously forecast, contract assets may have to be written down to the extent they are no longer considered to be fully recoverable. We perform ongoing profitability reviews of our contracts in order to determine whether the latest estimates are appropriate. Key factors reviewed include:
* Transaction volumes or other inputs affecting future revenues which can vary depending on customer requirements, plans, market position and other factors such as general economic conditions.
* Our ability to achieve key contract milestones connected with the transition, development, transformation and deployment phases for customer contracts.
* The status of commercial relations with customers and the implications for future revenue and cost projections.
* Our estimates of future staff and third party costs and the degree to which cost savings and efficiencies are deliverable.
Some consumer broadband and TV products and arrangements to provide external communications providers with exclusive use of Openreach’s fixed-network telecommunications infrastructure meet the definition of operating leases under IFRS 16. At inception of a contract, we determine whether the contract is, or contains, a lease following the accounting policy set out in note 15. Arrangements meeting the definition of a lease in which we act as lessor are classified as operating or finance leases at lease inception based on an overall assessment of whether the lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the underlying asset. If this is the case then the lease is a finance lease; if not, it is an operating lease. For sub-leases, we make this assessment by reference to the characteristics of the right-of-use asset associated with the head lease rather than the underlying leased asset.
Income from arrangements classified as operating leases is presented as revenue where it relates to our core operating activities, for example leases of fixed-line telecommunications infrastructure to external communications providers and leases of devices to consumer customers as part of fixed access subscription products. Operating lease income from other arrangements is presented within other operating income (note 6). We recognise operating lease payments as income on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Any upfront payments received, such as connection fees, are deferred over the lease term. Determining the lease term is subject to the significant judgements set out in note 15.
Where the contract contains both lease and non-lease components, the transaction price is allocated between the components on the basis of relative standalone selling price. Where an arrangement is assessed as a finance lease we derecognise the underlying asset and recognise a receivable equivalent to the net investment in the lease. Finance lease receivables are presented in note 16. The receivable is measured based on future payments to be received discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, adjusted for any direct costs. Any difference between the derecognised asset and the finance lease receivable is recognised in the income statement. Where the nature of services delivered relates to our core operating activities it is presented as revenue. Where it relates to non-core activities it is presented within other operating income (note 6).
The following table disaggregates external revenue by our major service lines and by reportable segment.
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2024 | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| ICT and managed networks | — | 3,592 | — | 3,592 |
| Fixed access subscriptions | 4,333 | 2,149 | 2,900 | 9,382 |
| Mobile subscriptions | 3,557 | 1,187 | — | 4,744 |
| Equipment and other services | 1,896 | 1,129 | 76 | 16 |
| Revenue before specific items | 9,786 | 8,057 | 2,976 | 16 |
| Specific items a (note 9) | (38) | |||
| Revenue | 20,797 |
| Consumer Business | Openreach | Other | Total (re-presented b ) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2023 | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| ICT and managed networks | — | 3,352 | — | 3,352 |
| Fixed access subscriptions | 4,059 | 1,893 | 2,716 | 8,668 |
| Mobile subscriptions | 3,351 | 1,160 | — | 4,511 |
| Equipment and other services | 2,270 | 1,772 | 69 | 27 |
| Revenue before specific items | 9,680 | 8,177 | 2,785 | 27 |
| Specific items a (note 9) | 12 | |||
| Revenue | 20,681 |
a Relates to regulatory matters classified as specific. See note 9.
b Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit, formed through the merger of our Enterprise and Global units, see note 1.
Revenue expected to be recognised in future periods for performance obligations that are not complete (or are partially complete) as at 31 March 2024 is £12,133m (FY23: £12,792m). Of this, £6,052m (FY23: £6,592m) relates to ICT and managed services contracts and equipment and other services which will substantially be recognised as revenue within three years. Fixed access and mobile subscription services typically have shorter contract periods and so £6,081m (FY23: £6,200m) will substantially be recognised as revenue within two years. Revenue recognised this year relating to performance obligations that were satisfied, or partially satisfied, in previous years was not material. Revenue related to customers’ unexercised rights (for example, unused amounts on prepaid SIM cards) was not material.
Revenue has been adjusted to reflect a risk of billing inaccuracy where there is a high level of manual processing through certain billing systems. This is associated with a small number of products within our Business unit which contain bespoke pricing. £41m has been recognised as an IFRS 9 financial liability and deducted from revenue, and has been derived from an estimate of the possible range of the adjustment from £24m to £64m based on the results of a sample of billing items. This is presented within Note 17 and represents our best estimate required to cover ongoing billing adjustments to products relating to both current and prior periods. If the final quantum of adjustments is less than expected, the adjustment will be released back to the income statement.
Presented within revenue is £3,031m (FY23: £2,909m) income from arrangements classified as operating leases under IFRS 16 and which represent core business activities for the group.```markdown
Income relates predominantly to Openreach’s leases of fixed-line telecommunications infrastructure to external communications providers, classified as fixed access subscription revenue in the table above, and leases of devices to Consumer customers as part of fixed access subscription offerings, classified as equipment and other services. During the year we also recognised: – £26m (FY23: £29m) operating lease income from non-core business activities which is presented in other operating income (note 6). Note 15 presents an analysis of payments to be received across the remaining term of operating lease arrangements. – £40m (FY23: £58m) revenue in relation to upfront gains from arrangements meeting the definition of a finance lease. These arrangements meet the criteria for revenue recognition as they concern leases and sub-leases of telecommunications infrastructure that represent core business activities of the group. £38m (FY23: £69m) of this income relates to the sub-leasing of right-of-use assets. These are primarily operating sub-leases of unutilised properties, and finance sub-leases of telecommunications infrastructure.
Material accounting policies that apply to contract assets and liabilities
We recognise contract assets for goods and services for which control has transferred to the customer before we have the right to bill. These assets mainly relate to mobile handsets provided upfront but paid for over the course of a contract. Contract assets are reclassified as receivables when the right to payment becomes unconditional and we have billed the customer. Contract liabilities are recognised when we have received advance payment for goods and services that we have not transferred to the customer. These primarily relate to fees received for connection and installation services that are not distinct performance obligations. Where the initial set-up, transition or transformation phase of a long-term contract is considered to be a distinct performance obligation we recognise a contract asset for any work performed but not billed. Conversely a contract liability is recognised where these activities are not distinct performance obligations and we receive upfront consideration. In this case eligible costs associated with delivering these services are capitalised as fulfilment costs, see note 16. We provide for expected lifetime losses on contract assets following the policy set out in note 16.
Contract assets and liabilities are as follows:
| At 31 March | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Contract assets Current | 1,410 | 1,565 |
| Non-current | 330 | 369 |
| 1,740 | 1,934 | |
| Contract liabilities Current | 906 | 859 |
| Non-current | 175 | 193 |
| 1,081 | 1,052 |
£876m of the contract liability at 31 March 2023 was recognised as revenue during the year (FY23: £903m). Impairment losses of £35m were recognised on contract assets during the year (FY23: £46m). The expected credit loss provisions recognised against contract assets vary across the group due to the nature of our customers; the expected loss rate at 31 March 2024 was 3% (FY23: 3%).
| Year ended 31 March | Notes | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating costs by nature | |||
| Staff costs: Wages and salaries | 3,843 | 3,858 | |
| Social security costs | 425 | 424 | |
| Other pension costs | 19 | 582 | |
| Share-based payment expense | 21 | 590 | 71 |
| Total staff costs | 4,921 | 4,952 | |
| Own work capitalised | (1,432) | (1,364) | |
| Net staff costs | 3,489 | 3,588 | |
| Net indirect labour costs | b | 456 | 381 |
| Net labour costs | 3,945 | 3,969 | |
| Product costs | 3,527 | 3,368 | |
| Sales commissions | 636 | 589 | |
| Payments to telecommunications operators | 1,227 | 1,354 | |
| Property and energy costs | 1,338 | 1,242 | |
| Network operating and IT costs | 930 | 913 | |
| TV programme rights charges | — | 354 | |
| Provision and installation | 515 | 591 | |
| Marketing and sales | 367 | 363 | |
| Net impairment losses on trade receivables and contract assets | 165 | 138 | |
| Other operating costs | 323 | 103 | |
| Other operating income | (238) | (243) | |
| Depreciation and amortisation, including impairment charges | 4,899 | 4,753 | |
| Total operating costs before specific items | 17,634 | 17,494 | |
| Specific items | 9 | 949 | 568 |
| Of which goodwill impairment | 488 | — | |
| Total operating costs | 18,583 | 18,062 |
Operating costs before specific items include the following:
| Notes | 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaver costs | 9 | 11 | |
| Research and development expenditure | 726 | 683 | |
| Foreign currency (gains)/losses | (2) | (9) | |
| Inventories recognised as an expense | 2,170 | 2,311 |
a c d c e a
Leaver costs are included within wages and salaries, except for leaver costs of £242m (FY23: £129m) associated with restructuring costs, which have been recorded as specific items.
b Net indirect labour costs relate to subcontracted labour costs net of capitalised indirect labour costs of £772m (FY23: £824m).
c TV programme rights charges relate to programme rights assets which were transferred to the sports joint venture in August 2022, see note 22.
d Consists of net impairment losses on trade receivables and contract assets in Consumer of £98m (FY23: £94m), in Business of £45m (FY23: £32m), in Openreach of £20m (FY23: £5m) and in Other of £2m (FY23: £1m).
e Research and development expenditure includes amortisation of £679m (FY23: £632m) in respect of capitalised development costs and operating expenses of £47m (FY23: £51m). In addition, the group capitalised software development costs of £429m (FY23: £503m).
Depreciation and amortisation, which includes impairment charges, is analysed as follows:
| Year ended 31 March | Notes | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depreciation and amortisation before impairment charges | |||
| Intangible assets | 13 | 1,248 | 1,165 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 14 | 2,892 | 2,878 |
| Right-of-use assets | 15 | 652 | 689 |
| Impairment charges | |||
| Intangible assets | 13 | — | — |
| Property, plant and equipment | 14 | 108 | 11 |
| Right-of-use assets | 15 | (1) | 10 |
| Total depreciation and amortisation before specific items | 4,899 | 4,753 | |
| Impairment charges classified as specific items | 9 | ||
| Intangible assets | 488 | — | |
| Property, plant and equipment | — | — | |
| Right-of-use assets | 11 | 65 | |
| Total depreciation and amortisation | 5,398 | 4,818 |
a b c
a Impairments of network infrastructure and engineering stores in FY24 and other assets in FY23, see note 14.
b FY24 impairment charge reflects a net reversal of impairment on properties reoccupied subsequent to initial impairment.
c FY24 impairment charge represents impairment of goodwill allocated to our Business cash generating unit, further details in note 13.
Key management personnel comprise Executive and Non-Executive Directors and members of the Executive Committee. Compensation of key management personnel is shown in the table below:
| Year ended 31 March | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term employee benefits | 16.6 | 23.0 |
| Post employment benefits | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Share-based payments | 8.1 | 6.7 |
| 25.4 | 30.4 |
a a
Post employment benefits include cash pension allowances paid to the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer. The group does not contribute to defined contribution or defined benefit pension schemes on behalf of key management personnel. Key management personnel are compensated solely in the form of cash and share-based payments. During FY24, one member of key management personnel (FY23: none) exercised saveshare options, see note 21.
| 2024 | 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Average FTE | Year end FTE | Average FTE | |
| ’000 | ’000 | ’000 | |
| UK | 77.3 | 74.9 | 71.4 |
| Non-UK | 20.1 | 20.0 | 20.3 |
| Total employees | 97.4 | 94.9 | 91.7 |
| Consumer | 18.1 | 16.3 | 15.8 |
| Business | 23.6 | 23.3 | 22.6 |
| Openreach | 35.1 | 34.9 | 32.8 |
| Other | 20.6 | 20.4 | 20.5 |
| Total employees | 97.4 | 94.9 | 91.7 |
a b a b b
c
a Average reflecting monthly average headcount.
b Average reflecting the full-time equivalent of full- and part-time employees, excluding subcontract labour. There were 28.4k FTE agency & subcontract labour at the FY24 year-end (FY23: 33.0k).
c Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit, formed through the merger of our Enterprise and Global units, see note 1.
The following fees were paid or are payable to the company’s auditors, KPMG LLP and other firms in the KPMG network.
| Year ended 31 March | 2024 £000 | 2023 £000 |
|---|---|---|
| Fees payable to the company’s auditors and its associates for: | ||
| Audit services a | ||
| The audit of the parent company and the consolidated financial statements | 14,473 | 13,558 |
| The audit of the company’s subsidiaries | 6,294 | 6,274 |
| b | 20,767 | 19,832 |
| Audit related assurance services | 2,487 | 2,553 |
| Other non-audit services | 33 | 55 |
| Total services | 23,287 | 22,440 |
a Services in relation to the audit of the parent company and the consolidated financial statements. This also includes fees payable for the statutory audits of the financial statements of subsidiary companies.
b Includes services that are required by law or regulation to be carried out by an appointed auditor and services that support us to fulfil obligations required by law or regulation. This includes fees for the review of interim results, the accrued fee for the audit of the group’s regulatory financial statements and providing comfort letters for bond issuances.
Fees payable to auditors other than KPMG for audits of certain overseas subsidiaries were £164,000 (FY23: £171,000). The BT Pension Scheme is an associated pension fund as defined in the Companies (Disclosure of Auditor Remuneration and Liability Limitation Agreements) (Amendment) Regulations 2011.
```# Financial statements
In FY24 KPMG LLP received total fees from the BT Pension Scheme of £1.9m (FY23: £1.6m) in respect of the following services:
| 2024 £000 | 2023 £000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Audit of financial statements of associates | 1,767 | 1,622 |
| Audit-related assurance services | 26 | 14 |
| Other non-audit services | 74 | — |
| Total services | 1,867 | 1,636 |
Our income statement and segmental analysis separately identify trading results on an adjusted basis, being before specific items. The directors believe that presentation of the group’s results in this way is relevant to an understanding of the group’s financial performance as specific items are those that in management’s judgement need to be disclosed by virtue of their size, nature or incidence. This presentation is consistent with the way that financial performance is measured by management and reported to the Board and the Executive Committee and assists in providing an additional analysis of our reporting trading results. Specific items may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
In determining whether an event or transaction is specific, management considers quantitative as well as qualitative factors. Examples of charges or credits meeting the above definition and which have been presented as specific items in the current and/or prior years include significant business restructuring programmes such as the current group-wide cost transformation and modernisation programme, acquisitions and disposals of businesses and investments, impairment of goodwill, charges or credits relating to retrospective regulatory matters, property rationalisation programmes, historical property-related provisions, significant out of period contract settlements, net interest on our pension obligation, and the impact of remeasuring deferred tax balances. In the event that items meet the criteria, which are applied consistently from year to year, they are treated as specific items. Any releases to provisions originally booked as a specific item are also classified as specific. Conversely, when a reversal occurs in relation to a prior year item not classified as specific, the reversal is not classified as specific in the current year. Movements relating to the sports joint venture (Sports JV) with Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), such as fair value gains or losses on the A and C preference shares or impairment charges on the equity-accounted investment are classified as specific. Refer to note 24 for further detail.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
162
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ||
| Retrospective regulatory matters | 38 | (12) |
| Specific revenue | 38 | (12) |
| Operating costs | ||
| Restructuring charges | 388 | 300 |
| BT Sport disposal | — | 155 |
| Sports JV – subsequent movements | 32 | 34 |
| Other divestment-related items | (22) | 2 |
| Retrospective regulatory matters | 18 | 12 |
| Historical property-related provisions | 34 | — |
| Specific operating costs before depreciation and amortisation | 450 | 503 |
| Impairment charges due to property rationalisation | 11 | 65 |
| Impairment of goodwill | 488 | — |
| Specific operating costs | 949 | 568 |
| Specific operating loss | 987 | 556 |
| Net finance expense | ||
| Finance expense relating to the BT Sport disposal | — | (13) |
| Interest expense on retirement benefit obligation | 121 | 18 |
| Specific net finance expense | 121 | 5 |
| Net specific items charge before tax | 1,108 | 561 |
| Taxation | ||
| Tax credit on specific items above | (145) | (308) |
| (145) | (308) | |
| Net specific items charge after tax | 963 | 253 |
We recognised net £56m impact in relation to historical regulatory matters, with £38m charges recognised in revenue and £18m within operating costs (FY23: net impact of £nil). These items represent movements in provisions relating to various matters.
We have incurred charges of £388m (FY23: £300m) relating to projects associated with our group-wide cost transformation and modernisation programme. Costs primarily relate to leaver costs, consultancy costs, and staff costs associated with colleagues working exclusively on programme activity. The net cash cost of restructuring activity during the year was £348m (FY23: £326m). The programme was first announced in May 2020 and runs until the end of FY25. In response to cost inflation, during FY23 we revised the gross annualised savings target to £3.0bn (previously £2.5bn), with a cost to achieve of £1.6bn (previously £1.3bn). We have now achieved our £3bn target 12 months early at a cost to achieve of £1.5bn, £0.1bn lower than target (FY23: achieved gross annualised savings of £2.1bn and costs of £1.1bn).The cumulative cash costs incurred amount to £1.5bn (FY23: £1.1bn).
In the prior year, we completed the disposal of BT Sport operations through forming the Sports JV with WBD. We recognised a profit on disposal of £28m in specific items, made up of £155m charges recognised within operating costs net of £183m tax credits. We also recognised a £13m credit within finance costs as specific, relating to a foreign exchange hedging arrangement with the Sports JV.
Subsequent to the BT Sport disposal, we have recorded a net fair value loss of £22m (FY23: £34m) on the A and C preference shares held in the Sports JV (see note 24), and £10m additional net costs relating to the transaction.
We recognised a £22m credit (FY23: £2m charge) comprising a net £25m gain on disposal from the completed divestments of Pelipod Limited, BT Enia S.p.A and certain city fibre networks and associated infrastructure assets in Germany; offset by £3m charges relating to ongoing divestment activity.
During FY24 we recognised a provision of £34m as a specific item (FY23: nil) in relation to the cost of remediating and rectifying asbestos related property issues where we have a present obligation to do this.
During FY24, we recognised a £11m impairment charge as specific (FY23: £65m), in relation to an ongoing property rationalisation programme.
We have recognised an impairment charge of £488m (FY23: nil) in respect of goodwill allocated to our Business cash generating unit. See note 13 for more details.
During the year we incurred £121m (FY23: £18m) of interest costs in relation to our defined benefit pension obligations.
A tax credit of £145m was recognised in relation to specific items (FY23: £308m, of which £183m relates to the BT Sport disposal).
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
163
Financial statements
Current income tax is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries where the group’s subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures operate and generate taxable income. We evaluate positions taken in tax returns where tax regulation is subject to interpretation, and establish provisions if appropriate based on the amounts likely to be paid to tax authorities. Deferred tax is recognised, using the liability method, in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of our assets and liabilities and their tax base. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which the asset is realised or liability settled, based on tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred and current income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and when the deferred income tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority where there is an intention to settle the balances on a net basis. Any remaining deferred tax asset is recognised only when, on the basis of all available evidence, it is probable that there will be suitable taxable profits against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised. Deferred tax balances for which there is a right of offset within the same jurisdiction are presented net on the face of the group balance sheet as permitted by IAS 12, with the exception of deferred tax related to our pension schemes which is disclosed within deferred tax assets.
We seek to pay tax in accordance with the laws of the countries where we do business. However, in some areas these laws are unclear, and it can take many years to agree an outcome with a tax authority or through litigation. We estimate our tax on country- by-country and issue-by-issue bases. Our key uncertainties are whether our intra-group trading model will be accepted by a particular tax authority and whether intra-group payments are subject to withholding taxes. We provide for the predicted outcome where an outflow is probable, but the agreed amount can differ materially from our estimates. Approximately 65% by value of the provisions are under active tax authority examination and are therefore likely to be re-estimated or resolved in the coming 12 months. £112m (FY23: £104m) is included in current tax liabilities or offset against current tax assets where netting is appropriate. We are subject to regular tax authority review, under a downside case an additional amount of £123m could be required to be paid. This amount is not provided as we don’t consider this outcome to be probable. Deciding whether to recognise deferred tax assets is judgemental. We only recognise them when we consider it is probable that they can be recovered.# 10. Taxation
In making this judgement we consider evidence such as historical financial performance, future financial plans and trends and whether our intra-group pricing model has been agreed by the relevant tax authority. The value of the group’s income tax assets and liabilities is disclosed on the group balance sheet. The value of the group’s deferred tax assets and liabilities is disclosed below.
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom Corporation tax at 25% (FY23: 19%) | (10) | — |
| Adjustments in respect of earlier years | — | 63 |
| Non-UK taxation | ||
| Current | (77) | (67) |
| Adjustments in respect of earlier years | (10) | 9 |
| Total current taxation (expense) | (97) | 5 |
| Deferred taxation | ||
| Origination and reversal of temporary differences | (280) | 102 |
| Adjustments in respect of earlier years | 46 | 56 |
| Remeasurement of temporary differences | — | 13 |
| Total deferred taxation credit (expense) | (234) | 171 |
| Total taxation (expense) | (331) | 176 |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
164
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
Factors affecting our taxation expense for the year
The taxation expense on the profit for the year differs from the amount computed by applying the UK corporation tax rate to the profit before taxation as a result of the following factors:
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before taxation | 1,186 | 1,729 |
| Expected taxation expense at UK rate of 25% (FY23: 19%) | (297) | (328) |
| Effects of: | ||
| (Higher)/lower taxes on non-UK profits | 25 | — |
| Net permanent differences between tax and accounting | (114) | 352 |
| Adjustments in respect of earlier years b | 40 | 126 |
| Prior year non-UK losses used against current year profits | 10 | 5 |
| Non-UK losses not recognised | 5 | 9 |
| Re-measurement of deferred tax balances | — | 12 |
| Total taxation credit (expense) | (331) | 176 |
| Exclude specific items (note 9) | (145) | (308) |
| Total taxation expense before specific items | (476) | (132) |
a c a Includes income that is not taxable or UK income taxable at a different rate including the UK patent box incentive of £60m (FY23: £35m), and expenses for which no tax relief is received including a loss on goodwill impairment of £122m. In FY23 this included the benefit of the UK super-deduction of £250m and the non-taxable profit on the disposal and revaluation of BT Sport of £104m.
b Reflects the differences between initial accounting estimates and tax returns submitted to tax authorities, including the release and establishment of provisions for uncertain tax positions.
c Reflects losses made in countries where it has not been considered appropriate to recognise a deferred tax asset, as future taxable profits are not probable.
| 2024 Tax credit (expense) £m | 2023 Tax credit (expense) £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | ||
| Taxation on items that will not be reclassified to the income statement | ||
| Pension remeasurements | 600 | 732 |
| Tax on items that have been or may be reclassified subsequently to the income statement | ||
| Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations | 9 | — |
| Fair value movements on cash flow hedges – net fair value gains or (losses) | 69 | (90) |
| – recognised in income and expense | — | — |
| Total tax recognised in other comprehensive income | 678 | 642 |
| Current tax credit | — | 8 |
| Deferred tax credit (expense) | 678 | 634 |
| Total tax recognised in other comprehensive income | 678 | 642 |
a a Includes £nil (FY23: £nil) relating to cash contributions made to reduce retirement benefit obligations.
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | ||
| Tax (expense) credit relating to share-based payments | (12) | (9) |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
165
Financial statements
| Fixed asset differences £m | Retirement obligations £m | Share-based payments £m | Jurisdictional losses £m | Other £m | Tax offset £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 April 2022 | 2,913 | (195) | (36) | (857) | (154) | — | 1,671 |
| Expense (credit) recognised in the income statement | 886 | (18) | (13) | (1,022) | (4) | — | (171) |
| Expense (credit) recognised in other comprehensive income | — | (413) | — | (311) | 90 | — | (634) |
| Expense (credit) recognised in equity | — | — | 9 | — | — | — | 9 |
| Exchange differences | — | — | — | (4) | (3) | — | (7) |
| Acquisition of subsidiary | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | 2 |
| Transfer from current tax | — | — | — | — | 41 | — | 41 |
| At 31 March 2023 | 3,799 | (626) | (40) | (2,194) | (28) | — | 911 |
| Non-current | |||||||
| Deferred tax asset | — | (626) | (40) | (2,194) | (28) | 2,179 | (709) |
| Deferred tax liability | 3,799 | — | — | — | — | (2,179) | 1,620 |
| At 31 March 2023 | 3,799 | (626) | (40) | (2,194) | (28) | — | 911 |
| Expense (credit) recognised in the income statement | 782 | (17) | 2 | (454) | (79) | — | 234 |
| Expense (credit) recognised in other comprehensive income | — | (325) | — | (266) | (87) | — | (678) |
| Expense (credit) recognised in equity | — | — | 12 | — | — | — | 12 |
| Exchange differences | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | — | 6 |
| At 31 March 2024 | 4,581 | (968) | (26) | (2,911) | (191) | — | 485 |
| Non-current | |||||||
| Deferred tax asset | — | (968) | (26) | (2,911) | (191) | 3,048 | (1,048) |
| Deferred tax liability | 4,581 | — | — | — | — | (3,048) | 1,533 |
| At 31 March 2024 | 4,581 | (968) | (26) | (2,911) | (191) | — | 485 |
a Includes a deferred tax asset of £nil (FY23: £8m) arising on contributions payable to defined contribution pension plans. The majority of the deferred tax assets and liabilities noted above are anticipated to be realised after more than 12 months.
We expect a large proportion of our capital spend on fibre rollout to be eligible for full expensing under the UK capital allowances regime, which provides 100% tax relief in the year of spend on qualifying assets. These deductions drive a projected UK tax loss and no UK tax payments for FY24. The enhanced and accelerated tax deductions arising under the Government’s super-deduction regime for qualifying capital spend during FY22 and FY23, together with full expensing in FY24 and pension deficit contribution deductions, result in c. £11.3bn of tax losses expected to be carried forward from FY24, to be utilised against future UK taxable profits. These are represented by a net c. £2.8bn deferred tax asset which is disclosed within the £2,911m deferred tax asset relating to tax losses in the table above.
The group is within the scope of the OECD Pillar Two model rules. The UK has enacted Pillar Two legislation which applies for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2024. Since the Pillar Two legislation was not effective for the current period, the group has no related current tax exposure. Under the legislation, the group is liable to pay a top-up tax for the difference between its Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) effective tax rate per jurisdiction and the 15% minimum rate. As the UK rate of corporation tax from FY24 will be 25%, and the group’s business is primarily in the UK, the impact of these rules on the group is not expected to be material.
At 31 March 2024 we had operating losses and other temporary differences carried forward in respect of which no deferred tax assets were recognised amounting to £3.7bn (FY23: £3.7bn). Our other temporary differences have no expiry date restrictions. The expiry date of operating losses carried forward is dependent upon the tax law of the various territories in which the losses arose. A summary of expiry dates for losses in respect of which restrictions apply is set out below:
| At 31 March 2024 £m | Expiry | |
|---|---|---|
| Restricted losses | ||
| Europe | — | 2025 - 2043 |
| Americas | 372 | 2025 - 2033 |
| Other | 2 | 2025 - 2033 |
| Total restricted losses | 374 | |
| Unrestricted operating losses | 3,080 | No expiry |
| Other temporary differences | 209 | No expiry |
| Total | 3,663 |
At 31 March 2024 we had UK capital losses carried forward in respect of which no deferred tax assets were recognised amounting to £16.8bn (FY23: £16.8bn). These losses have no expiry date, but we consider the future utilisation of significant amounts of these losses to be remote.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
166
Financial statements
At 31 March 2024 the undistributed earnings of non-UK subsidiaries were £2.6bn (FY23: £2.5bn). No deferred tax liabilities have been recognised in respect of these unremitted earnings because the group is in a position to control the timing of any dividends from subsidiaries and hence any tax consequences that may arise. Under current tax rules, tax of £44m (FY23: £41m) would arise if these earnings were to be repatriated to the UK.
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit after tax attributable to equity shareholders by the weighted average number of shares in issue after deducting the own shares held by employee share ownership trusts and treasury shares. In calculating the diluted earnings per share, share options outstanding and other potential shares have been taken into account where the impact of these is dilutive.
| Year ended 31 March 2024 (millions) | Year ended 31 March 2023 (millions) | |
|---|---|---|
| Basic weighted average number of shares | 9,823 | 9,803 |
| Dilutive shares from share options | 39 | 83 |
| Dilutive shares from share awards | 136 | 171 |
| Diluted weighted average number of shares | 9,998 | 10,057 |
| Basic earnings per share | 8.7 p | 19.4 p |
| Diluted earnings per share | 8.6 p | 18.9 p |
The earnings per share calculations are based on profit after tax attributable to equity shareholders of the parent company which excludes non-controlling interests. Profit after tax was £855m (FY23: £1,905m) and profit after tax attributable to non-controlling interests was £nil (FY23: £4m). Profit attributable to non-controlling interests is not presented separately in the financial statements as it is not material.
We have a progressive dividend policy to maintain or grow the dividend each year whilst taking into consideration a number of factors including underlying medium-term earnings expectations and levels of business reinvestment.What dividends have been paid? A final dividend of 5.69p per share amounting to approximately £553m is proposed in respect of the year ended 31 March 2024 (FY23: final dividend of 5.39p per share amounting to £530m paid in respect of the year ended 31 March 2023). An interim dividend of 2.31p per share amounting to £227m was paid on 2 February 2024 (FY23: interim dividend of 2.31p per share amounting to £226m paid). This value may differ from the amount shown for equity dividends paid in the group cash flow statement, which represents the actual cash paid in relation to dividend cheques that have been presented over the course of the financial year.
| 2024 | 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | pence per share | £m | pence per share | £m |
| Final dividend in respect of the prior year | 5.39 | 530 | 5.39 | 527 |
| Interim dividend in respect of the current year | 2.31 | 227 | 2.31 | 226 |
| 7.70 | 757 | 7.70 | 753 |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 167
Financial statements
Material accounting policies that apply to intangible assets
We recognise identifiable intangible assets where we control the asset, it is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the asset will flow to the group, and we can reliably measure the cost of the asset. We amortise all intangible assets, other than goodwill, over their useful economic life. The method of amortisation reflects the pattern in which the assets are expected to be consumed. If the pattern cannot be determined reliably, the straight-line method is used.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the group’s share of the identifiable net assets (including intangible assets) of the acquired business. Our goodwill impairment policy is set out later in this note.
Acquired intangible assets – customer relationships and brands
Intangible assets such as customer relationships or brands acquired through business combinations are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition and subsequently carried at amortised cost. Assumptions are used in estimating the fair values of these relationships or brands and include management’s estimates of revenue and profits to be generated by them.
Telecommunications licences
Licence fees paid to governments, which permit telecommunications activities to be operated for defined periods, are initially recorded at cost and amortised from the time the network is available for use to the end of the licence period or where our usage can extend beyond the initial licence period, over the period we expect to benefit from the use of the licences, which is typically 20 years. Licences acquired through business combinations are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition and subsequently carried at amortised cost. The fair value is based on management’s assumption of future cash flows using market expectations at acquisition date.
Computer software
Computer software comprises computer software licences purchased from third parties, and also the cost of internally developed software. Computer software licences purchased from third parties are initially recorded at cost. We capitalise costs directly associated with the production of internally developed software, including direct and indirect labour costs of development, only where it is probable that the software will generate future economic benefits, the cost of the asset can be reliably measured and technical feasibility can be demonstrated, in which case it is capitalised as an intangible asset on the balance sheet. Costs which do not meet these criteria and research costs are expensed as incurred. Our development costs which give rise to internally developed software include upgrading the network architecture or functionality and developing service platforms aimed at offering new services to our customers.
Other
Other intangible assets include website development costs and other licences. Items are capitalised at cost and amortised on a straight-line basis over their useful economic life or the term of the contract.
Estimated useful economic lives
The estimated useful economic lives assigned to the principal categories of intangible assets are as follows:
– Computer software 2 to 10 years
– Telecommunications licences 2 to 20 years
– Customer relationships and brands 1 to 15 years
Impairment of intangible assets
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are tested for impairment if events or changes in circumstances (assessed at each reporting date) indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. When an impairment test is performed, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference to the higher of the net present value of the expected future cash flows (value in use) of the relevant cash generating unit and the fair value less costs to dispose. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually as described below. Impairment losses are recognised in the income statement, as a specific item. If a cash generating unit is impaired, impairment losses are allocated firstly against goodwill, and secondly on a pro-rata basis against intangible and other assets.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 168
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
| Customer relationships and brands | Telecoms licences | a | b | c | Goodwill and other software | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | |||||||
| At 1 April 2022 | 7,917 | 3,383 | 3,490 | 5,346 | 971 | 21,107 | |
| Additions | — | — | — | 815 | 203 | 1,018 | |
| Disposals and adjustments | (21) | — | — | (466) | 151 | (336) | |
| Transfers | — | — | — | 30 | (38) | (8) | |
| Exchange differences | 72 | — | 1 | 2 | 7 | 82 | |
| Transfers to assets held for sale | (13) | — | — | — | — | (13) | |
| At 31 March 2023 | 7,955 | 3,383 | 3,491 | 5,727 | 1,294 | 21,850 | |
| Additions | — | — | — | 732 | 206 | 938 | |
| Disposals and adjustments | (4) | (1) | (12) | (671) | 298 | (390) | |
| Transfers | — | — | — | 217 | (95) | 122 | |
| Exchange differences | (29) | — | (1) | (1) | (5) | (36) | |
| At 31 March 2024 | 7,922 | 3,382 | 3,478 | 6,004 | 1,698 | 22,484 | |
| Accumulated amortisation | |||||||
| At 1 April 2022 | — | 2,469 | 908 | 3,595 | 326 | 7,298 | |
| Amortisation charge for the year | — | 231 | 185 | 596 | 153 | 1,165 | |
| Impairment | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Disposals and adjustments | — | — | 1 | (389) | 79 | (309) | |
| Transfers | — | — | — | (56) | 56 | — | |
| Exchange differences | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | |
| Transfers to assets held for sale | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| At 31 March 2023 | — | 2,700 | 1,095 | 3,747 | 621 | 8,163 | |
| Amortisation charge for the year | — | 231 | 185 | 762 | 70 | 1,248 | |
| Impairment | 488 | — | — | — | — | 488 | |
| Disposals and adjustments | — | — | (13) | (462) | 96 | (379) | |
| Transfers | — | — | — | (41) | 90 | 49 | |
| Exchange differences | — | — | (1) | — | (4) | (5) | |
| At 31 March 2024 | 488 | 2,931 | 1,266 | 4,006 | 873 | 9,564 | |
| Carrying amount | |||||||
| At 31 March 2023 | 7,955 | 683 | 2,396 | 1,980 | 673 | 13,687 | |
| At 31 March 2024 | 7,434 | 451 | 2,212 | 1,998 | 825 | 12,920 |
d e d f d d f
a Customer relationships and brands relate to customer relationships recognised on acquisition of EE.
b Telecoms licences and other primarily represents spectrum licences. These include 2100 MHz licence with book value of £593m (FY23: £643m), 1800 MHz with book value of £544m (FY23: £590m), 700Mhz with book value of £266m (FY23: £281m), 3400 MHz with book value of £226m (FY23: £242m) and 2600 MHz with book value of £185m (FY23: £206m). Spectrum licences are being amortised over a period between 14 and 20 years.
c Includes a carrying amount of £623m (FY23: £1,125m) in respect of assets under construction, which are not yet amortised.
d Disposals and adjustments include the removal of assets from the group’s fixed asset registers following disposals and the identification of fully amortised assets (including £0.3bn in FY24 through operation of the group’s annual asset verification exercise).
e For a breakdown of assets held for sale see note 22.
f During FY24, assets with cost of £122m and accumulated depreciation of £49m were reclassified from property, plant and equipment to intangible assets following review of asset registers.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 169
Financial statements
Impairment of goodwill
Material accounting policies that apply to impairment of goodwill
We perform an annual goodwill impairment review. Goodwill recognised in a business combination does not generate cash flows independently of other assets or groups of assets. As a result, the recoverable amount, being the value in use, is determined at a cash generating unit (CGU) level. These CGUs represent the smallest identifiable groups of assets that generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other groups of assets. Our CGUs are deemed to be Consumer and Business. We allocate goodwill to each of the CGUs that we expect to benefit from the business combination. Each CGU to which goodwill is allocated represents the lowest level within the group at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. The value in use of each CGU is determined using risk-adjusted cash flow projections derived from financial plans approved by the Board covering a five-year period. They reflect management’s risk-adjusted expectations of revenue, EBITDA growth, capital expenditure, working capital and operating cash flows, based on past experience and future expectations of business performance. Cash flows beyond the fifth year have been extrapolated using perpetuity growth rates.
Significant judgements and critical accounting estimates made in reviewing goodwill for impairment
Determining our CGUs
The determination of our CGUs is judgemental. The identification of CGUs involves an assessment of whether the asset or group of assets generate largely independent cash inflows. This involves consideration of how our core assets are operated and whether these generate independent revenue streams. In FY23 our CGUs were aligned with the Consumer, Enterprise and Global customer-facing units in existence at the time. From 1 April 2023 the Enterprise and Global units are managed and reported as a single combined unit, Business.# Financial statements
Financial information is provided to the Executive Committee on a consolidated basis only, and there have been material changes to the structure and organisation of the combined Business unit following the merger. During FY24 we have reviewed the identification of our CGUs in light of the creation of Business. We concluded that the Enterprise and Global CGUs have been replaced with a single Business CGU. In reaching this conclusion we considered the way in which the combined unit is monitored and the degree of integration within the combined unit, specifically in relation to revenue streams and its asset base. This conclusion also reflects the fact that the cash flows of the legacy Enterprise and Global units are no longer independent and it is no longer possible to report the performance of these units on an individual basis. Accordingly, our CGUs are Consumer and Business from 1 April 2023, aligned with the corresponding CFUs and operating segments (note 4).
Estimating value in use
Our value in use calculations require estimates in relation to uncertain items, including management’s expectations of future revenue growth, operating costs, profit margins, operating cash flows and the discount rate for each CGU. Future cash flows used in the value in use calculations are on a nominal basis and based on risk-adjusted projections derived from the latest Board-approved five-year financial plans, representing management's best risk-adjusted estimate of future growth. This includes the direct and indirect impacts of inflation and associated mitigations. Expectations about future growth reflect the expectations of growth in the markets to which the CGU relates and consideration of the overall variability relating to individual assumptions at the unit level. The future cash flows are discounted using a pre-tax nominal discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money. The discount rate used in each CGU is adjusted for the risk specific to the asset, including the countries in which cash flow will be generated, for which the future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted.
Estimating terminal growth
A long term growth rate into perpetuity is applied immediately at the end of the five year forecast period. We calculate this for each CGU as the lower of the nominal GDP growth rate forecasts and the long-term compound annual growth rate as estimated by management. Long-term compound annual growth rates may be lower than forecast nominal GDP growth rates due to market-specific factors including inflation expectations, the regulatory environment and competition intensity. We tested our goodwill for impairment as at 31 March 2024. The carrying value of goodwill and the key assumptions used in performing the annual impairment assessment and sensitivities are disclosed below.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 170
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
| Cost | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 April 2022 | 3,900 | 3,573 | 444 | — | 7,917 |
| Transfer | — | — | — | — | — |
| Acquisitions and disposals | (26) | 4 | 1 | — | (21) |
| Exchange differences | — | 4 | 68 | — | 72 |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | — | (4) | (9) | — | (13) |
| At 31 March 2023 | 3,874 | 3,577 | 504 | — | 7,955 |
| Transfer | — | (3,577) | (504) | 4,081 | — |
| Impairment | — | — | — | (488) | (488) |
| Acquisitions and disposals | — | — | — | (4) | (4) |
| Exchange differences | — | — | — | (29) | (29) |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | — | — | — | — | — |
| At 31 March 2024 | 3,874 | — | — | 3,560 | 7,434 |
Of the £4.1bn attributable to the Business CGU at 31 March 2023, £2.6bn relates to the acquisition of EE in 2016 with the rest relating to historical small acquisitions.
Outcome of our annual impairment review
Our FY24 impairment testing exercise concluded that there is significant headroom in our Consumer CGU, consistent with FY23. The carrying value of the Business CGU exceeded its value in use by £488m. We have therefore booked an impairment charge equivalent to this amount in the income statement, presented as a specific item (note 9). No impairment was recognised in FY23. Historical trends including the transition from legacy products indicate risk within forecasts which we have made appropriate adjustment for in line with IAS 36, so as to arrive at a risk adjusted estimate of future economic conditions which reflects long-term viability and trading risks inherent in delivering against the group’s strategic pillars. At the same time, to acknowledge this risk we have reduced terminal growth rate applied to cash flows when calculating the terminal value. We have also excluded uncommitted restructuring costs and benefits including those that relate to the group-wide restructuring programmes. The combined impact of these adjustments has led to a value in use for IAS 36 impairment testing purposes that is indicative of an impairment. Calculating the value in use has involved the application of assumptions and estimates that have had a material impact on the impairment charge recognised. Management judge that the Board-approved forecasts used to calculate value in use support the carrying amount of the Business CGU as at 31 March 2024. We consider below the impact of reasonably possible alternatives in the next 12 months.
What discount rate have we used?
The pre-tax discount rates applied to the cash flow forecasts are derived from our post-tax weighted average cost of capital. The assumptions used in the calculation of the group’s weighted average cost of capital are benchmarked to externally available data. The pre-tax discount rate used in performing the value in use calculation for Consumer was 9.25% in FY24 and 9.4% in FY23. We have used a slightly higher rate of 9.27% for Business. This reflects the higher risk countries in which it operates, which in FY23 were part of the Global CGU. In FY23 we used a discount rate of 9.4% for Enterprise and 9.7% for Global, again reflecting the higher risk from countries in which it operates. The reduction in discount rates in FY24 reflects that the cash flows, rather than the discount rate, have been risk adjusted.
What growth rates have we used?
The perpetuity growth rates are determined based on the forecast market growth rates of the regions in which the CGU operates, and reflect an assessment of the long-term growth prospects of that market. The growth rates have been benchmarked against external data for the relevant markets and analysts’ expectations. None of the growth rates applied exceed the expected average long-term growth rates for those markets or sectors. In FY24 we have used a perpetuity growth rate of 1.0% for Consumer and 0.7% for the Business CGU. In FY23 the perpetuity growth rate was 2.0% for Enterprise and Consumer, and 2.4% for Global.
Key assumptions applied to testing goodwill allocated to the Business CGU
Key assumptions that value in use is most sensitive to are EBITDA growth over the 5-year forecast period; the long term growth rate for the terminal period; and the weighted average cost of capital used to discount cash flows.
– Our value in use assumes risk-adjusted EBITDA compound annual growth of 0.7% over the 5-year forecast period. The growth rate is the projected adjusted EBITDA growth rate on the cash flow forecasts used in our goodwill impairment model and reflect the growth and maturity of the industry we operate in and historical trends. Compound annual growth rates are risk-adjusted to the compound annual growth rates used in our Board-approved forecasts.
– Application of the terminal growth rate of 0.7%, equivalent to compound annual growth within the terminal period, is viewed as a key assumption with c.75% of the value in use derived from terminal cash flows.
– Value in use is sensitive to the weighted average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows. The table below shows the sensitivity of the £488m impairment recognised to reasonably possible changes in key assumptions:
| Low scenario | High scenario | |
|---|---|---|
| EBITDA compound annual growth rate | +/- 1% (£1,260m) more impairment | £374m less impairment |
| Long term growth rate | +/- 0.7% (£478m) more impairment | £488m less impairment |
| Weighted average cost of capital | +/- 1% (£865m) more impairment | £488m less impairment |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 171
Financial statements
13. Intangible assets continued
Other sensitivities applicable to the Business CGU
Applying a severe but plausible downside scenario, reflecting a plan that we are highly confident will be achieved or exceeded, based on the same risk population would result in a further impairment charge of £2,430m in addition to the £488m recognised. Management consider that it is reasonably possible to expect that actual future cash flows will outperform the risk-adjusted cash flows modelled for the purpose of testing goodwill impairment. A less conservative view of risks and opportunities in the base case of our forecast would result in headroom of approximately £2,083m rather than the impairment charge booked.
Material accounting policies that apply to property, plant and equipment
Our property, plant and equipment is included at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, government grants and any impairment charges. Property, plant and equipment acquired through business combinations is initially recorded at fair value and subsequently accounted for on the same basis as our existing assets. We derecognise items of property, plant and equipment on disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. The difference between the sale proceeds and the net book value at the date of disposal is recognised in operating costs in the income statement. Included within the cost of network infrastructure and equipment are direct and indirect labour costs, materials and directly attributable overheads.# Financial statements
Building Digital UK (BDUK) government grants
We receive government grants in relation to BDUK and other rural superfast broadband contracts. Where we have achieved certain service levels, or delivered the network more efficiently than anticipated, we have an obligation to either re-invest or repay grant funding. Where this is the case, we recognise deferred income in respect of the funding that will be re-invested or repaid, and make a corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the related property, plant and equipment.
Assessing the timing of whether and when we change the estimated take-up assumption is judgemental as it involves considering information which is not always observable. Our consideration on whether and when to change the base case assumption is dependent on our expectation of the long-term take-up trend. Our assessment of how much grant income to defer includes consideration of the difference between the take-up percentage agreed with the local authority and the likelihood of actual take-up. The value of the government grants deferred is disclosed in note 17.
Network infrastructure
| Land and buildings | Held by Openreach | Held by other units | Assets under construction | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Cost | |||||
| At 1 April 2022 | 1,022 | 31,276 | 24,439 | 1,444 | 1,446 |
| Additions | 7 | — | 129 | 7 | 3,947 |
| Transfers | 89 | 2,617 | 913 | 211 | (3,822) |
| Disposals and adjustments | 31 | (118) | (183) | (33) | (70) |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | — | — | (108) | (13) | — |
| Exchange differences | 16 | — | 99 | 6 | 1 |
| At 31 March 2023 | 1,165 | 33,775 | 25,289 | 1,622 | 1,502 |
| Additions | 6 | 1 | 73 | 12 | 3,851 |
| Transfers | 85 | 2,562 | 906 | 279 | (3,954) |
| Disposals and adjustments | (95) | (208) | (2,198) | (162) | 137 |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | — | — | — | — | — |
| Exchange differences | (11) | — | (66) | (5) | (1) |
| At 31 March 2024 | 1,150 | 36,130 | 24,004 | 1,746 | 1,535 |
| Accumulated depreciation | |||||
| At 1 April 2022 | 621 | 17,476 | 20,050 | 1,025 | — |
| Depreciation charge for the year | 50 | 1,466 | 1,144 | 218 | — |
| Impairment | — | — | — | 11 | — |
| Transfers | — | 195 | (192) | (4) | — |
| Disposals and adjustments | 32 | (139) | (133) | (36) | — |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | — | — | (106) | (11) | — |
| Exchange differences | 13 | — | 91 | 7 | — |
| At 31 March 2023 | 716 | 18,998 | 20,854 | 1,210 | — |
| Depreciation charge for the year | 55 | 1,489 | 1,085 | 263 | — |
| Impairment | — | 78 | — | — | 30 |
| Transfers | — | — | (49) | — | — |
| Disposals and adjustments | (30) | (134) | (2,222) | (174) | — |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | — | — | — | — | — |
| Exchange differences | (9) | — | (61) | (5) | — |
| At 31 March 2024 | 732 | 20,431 | 19,607 | 1,294 | 30 |
| Carrying amount | |||||
| At 31 March 2023 | 449 | 14,777 | 4,435 | 412 | 1,502 |
| Engineering stores | — | — | — | — | 92 |
| Total at 31 March 2023 | 449 | 14,777 | 4,435 | 412 | 1,594 |
| At 31 March 2024 | 418 | 15,699 | 4,397 | 452 | 1,505 |
| Engineering stores | — | — | — | — | 91 |
| Total at 31 March 2024 | 418 | 15,699 | 4,397 | 452 | 1,596 |
a. Other mainly comprises motor vehicles, computers and fixtures and fittings.
b. Net of government grants of £91m (FY23: £150m).
c. Disposals and adjustments include the removal of assets from the group’s fixed asset registers following disposals and the identification of fully depreciated assets (including £2.2bn in FY24 through operation of the group’s annual asset verification exercise). They also include adjustments between gross cost and accumulated depreciation following review of fixed asset registers, and adjustments resulting from changes in assumptions used in calculating lease-end obligations where the corresponding asset is capitalised.
d. Transfers to assets held for sale are detailed in note 22.
e. During FY24, assets with cost of £122m and accumulated depreciation of £49m were reclassified from property, plant and equipment to intangible assets following review of asset registers.
Included within the disclosure are assets used in arrangements which represent core business activities for the group and which meet the definition of operating leases:
The carrying amount of land and buildings, including leasehold improvements, comprised:
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
| Freehold | 71 | 80 |
| Leasehold | 347 | 369 |
| Total land and buildings | 418 | 449 |
Network infrastructure
Some of our network assets are jointly controlled by EE Limited with Hutchison 3G UK Limited. These relate to shared 3G network and certain elements of network for 4G rural sites. The net book value of the group’s share of assets controlled by its joint operation MBNL is £759m (FY23: £721m) and is recorded within network infrastructure.
Within network infrastructure are assets with a net book value of £11.5bn (FY23: £10.9bn) which have useful economic lives of more than 18 years.
BT Tower
In FY24 we agreed to the sale of the BT Tower for headline consideration of £275m, as part of the simplification of the group’s property portfolio. The carrying amount of the BT Tower asset is £4m at 31 March 2024. It is not considered to meet the IFRS 5 criteria for classification as held for sale at the reporting date, reflecting the extent of decommissioning work needed to provide vacant possession of the site. The useful economic lives of assets associated with the BT Tower have been reassessed in light of the anticipated disposal in FY30.
Significant judgements made in accounting for the BT Tower sale
Exchange of contracts in respect of the BT Tower sale with MCR Hotels occurred during FY24, with transfer of legal title anticipated to take place in a three year window between 2028 and 2031 subject to achieving vacant possession of the site. We will continue to enjoy exclusive rights to occupy and access the site prior to completion. The delay between exchange and completion reflects the extensive work required to decommission the site. We have exercised significant judgement in concluding that control over BT Tower passes to the buyer at the point of completion rather than exchange. In doing so we performed a detailed assessment of the restrictions placed on BT’s use of the asset in the period following exchange, as well as the transaction pricing structure, and concluded that they were insufficient to represent a transfer to the buyer of sufficiently all the risks and rewards associated with ownership. We placed particular weight on the fact that legal title to the site does not transfer to the buyer until the point of completion. Had we concluded that control had passed on exchange of contracts in FY24, the transaction would have been treated as a sale and leaseback with profit on disposal recognised in the period and associated derecognition of the BT Tower asset and accounting for the leaseback.
Low carbon fleet
As reported in our TCFD statement on page 78, we’re working hard and investing to convert the majority of our fleet to electric or zero emission vehicles by the end of FY31.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
At inception of a contract, we determine whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A lease exists if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, for a period of time, in exchange for consideration. In making this assessment, we consider whether:
– The contract involves the use of an identified asset, either explicitly or implicitly. The asset must be physically distinct or represent substantially all the capacity of a physically distinct asset. Assets that a supplier has a substantive right to substitute are not considered distinct.
– The lessee (either the group, or the group’s customers) has the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the period of use; and
– The lessee has the right to direct the use of the asset, in other words, has the decision-making rights that are most relevant to changing how and for what purpose the asset is used.
Where practicable, and by class of underlying asset, we have elected to account for leases containing a lease component and one or more non-lease components as a single lease component. Where this election has been taken, it has been applied to the entire asset.
We recognise a lease liability and right-of-use asset at the commencement of the lease. Lease liabilities are initially measured at the present value of lease payments that are due over the lease term, discounted using the group’s incremental borrowing rate. The lease term is the non-cancellable period of the lease adjusted for the impact of any extension options that we are reasonably certain that the lessee will exercise, or termination options that we are reasonably certain that the lessee will not exercise. The incremental borrowing rate is the rate that we would have to pay for a loan of a similar term, and with similar security, to obtain an asset of similar value.
Lease payments include:
– fixed payments
– variable lease payments that depend on an index or rate
– amounts expected to be paid under residual value guarantees
– the exercise price of any purchase options that we are reasonably certain to exercise
– payments due over optional renewal periods where we are reasonably certain to renew
– penalties for early termination of the lease where we are reasonably certain to terminate early
Lease liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. They are remeasured if there is a change in future lease payments, including changes in the index or rate used to determine those payments, or the amount we expect to be payable under a residual value guarantee. We also remeasure lease liabilities where the lease term changes. This occurs when the non-cancellable period of the lease changes, or on occurrence of a significant event or change in circumstances within the control of the lessee and which changes our initial assessment in regard to whether the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise extension options or not to exercise termination options. Where the lease term changes we rem=(\i)reasure the lease liability using the group’s incremental borrowing rate at the date of reassessment. Where a significant event or change in circumstances does not occur, the lease term remains unchanged and the carrying amounts of the lease liability and associated right-of-use asset will decline over time.
Right-of-use assets are initially measured at the initial amount of the corresponding lease liabilities, adjusted for any prepaid lease payments, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of any decommissioning costs that have been recognised as provisions, less any lease incentives received. They are subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the asset or the end of the lease term. Right-of-use assets are tested for impairment following the policy set out in note 14 and are adjusted for any remeasurement of lease liabilities.
We have elected not to recognise lease liabilities and right-of-use assets for short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less, and leases of low-value assets with a purchase price under £5,000. We recognise payments for these items as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Any variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or rate, such as usage-based payments, are recognised as an expense in the period to which the variability relates.
At inception or on modification of a contract that contains a lease component, we allocate the consideration in the contract to each lease component on the basis of their relative stand-alone prices. When we act as a lessor, we determine at lease inception whether each lease is a finance lease or an operating lease. To classify each lease, we make an overall assessment of whether the lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of the underlying asset. If this is the case, then the lease is a finance lease; if not, then it is an operating lease. As part of this assessment, we consider certain indicators such as whether the lease is for the major part of the economic life of the asset.
When we are an intermediate lessor, we account for our interests in the headlease and the sublease separately. We assess the lease classification of a sublease with reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the headlease, not with reference to the underlying asset. If a headlease is a short-term lease to which we apply the exemption described above, then we classify the sublease as an operating lease.
If an arrangement contains lease and non-lease components, then we apply IFRS 15 to allocate the consideration in the contract. We apply the derecognition and impairment requirements in IFRS 9 to the net investment in the lease. We further regularly review estimated unguaranteed residual values used in calculating the gross investment in the lease. We recognise lease payments received under operating leases as income on a straight-line basis over the lease term as part of ‘other revenue’.
The lease term is a key determinant of the size of the lease liability and right-of-use asset recognised where the group acts as lessee; and the deferral period for any upfront connection charges where the group acts as lessor. Determining the lease term requires judgement to evaluate whether we are reasonably certain the lessee will exercise extension options or will not exercise termination options. Key facts and circumstances that create an incentive to exercise those options are considered; these include:
– Our anticipated operational, retail and office property requirements in the mid and long term.
– The availability of suitable alternative sites.
– Costs or penalties associated with exiting lease arrangements relative to the benefits to be gained, including costs of removing leasehold improvements or relocating, and indirect costs such as disruption to business.
– Significant investments in leased sites, in particular those with useful lives beyond the lease term.
– Costs associated with extending lease arrangements including rent increases during secondary lease periods.
Our definition of ‘reasonable certainty’, and therefore the lease term, will often align with the judgements made in our medium-term plan, in particular for leases of non-specialised property and equipment on rolling (or ‘evergreen’) arrangements that continue until terminated and which can be exited without significant penalty. Following initial determination of the lease term, we exercise judgement in evaluating whether events or changes in circumstances are sufficiently significant to change the initial assessment of whether we are reasonably certain the lessee will exercise extension options or will not exercise termination options; and in the subsequent reassessment of the lease term.
The quantum of the lease liability and right-of-use asset currently recognised on our balance sheet is most significantly affected by the judgement exercised in setting the lease term for the arrangement under which the bulk of our operational UK property estate is held. Setting the lease term for our leased cell sites has also involved the use of judgement, albeit to a lesser degree.
Substantially all of our leased property estate is held under an arrangement which can be terminated in 2031, at which point we may either vacate some or all properties or purchase the entire estate. If neither option is taken the lease continues to the next unilaterally available break point in 2041. The lease liability recognised for the arrangement reflects a lease end date of 2031. On initial recognition we concluded that, although the majority of these properties are expected to be needed on a long-term basis, we couldn’t be reasonably certain that we wouldn’t exercise the termination option or that we would exercise the purchase option. In coming to this conclusion, we had due regard to material sub-lease arrangements relating to the estate.As time progresses our assessment may change; if this happens, we will remeasure the lease liability and right-of-use asset to reflect either the rentals due for any properties we will continue to occupy, or the cost of purchasing the estate, using an updated discount rate. There would be no overall impact on net assets. If the assessment were to change at the balance sheet date of 31 March 2024: – Exercising the purchase option would lead to an estimated increase in the lease liability and right-of-use asset of between £3bn and £5bn. – Continuing to lease the estate beyond 2031 until the next available break in 2041 would lead to an estimated increase in the lease liability and right-of-use asset of between £1bn and £2bn. Our assessment will be directly linked to future strategic decisions, which will be resolved at some time prior to 2031, around the development of the fixed network and the associated rationalisation of our exchange estate. The breadth of the ranges reflects the significant uncertainty around key variables used to determine cash outflows, especially future inflation and which properties the group will be able to exit prior to or in 2031. Estimates are based on discounted cash outflows and do not reflect the likely and significant impact of cash inflows generated from the disposal, repurposing or subleasing of properties retained post-2031. We are permitted to hand a limited number of properties back to the lessor prior to 2031. On initial adoption of IFRS 16 we were not reasonably certain which properties would be handed back and as such the lease term did not reflect the exercise of these options. Subsequently we exercise judgement in identifying significant events that trigger reassessment of our initial conclusion. We exercise similar judgement in identifying events triggering reassessment of whether we are reasonably certain we will not exercise termination options associated with other leased properties. In doing so we consider decisions associated with our ongoing workplace rationalisation programme, in particular decisions to exit a particular location or lease an alternative property. Generally we remain reasonably certain that we will not exercise a termination option until implementation of the associated business plan has progressed to a stage that we are committed to exiting the property. At that point we reassess the lease term by reference to the time we expect to remain in occupation of the property and any notice period associated with exercise of the option.
Cell sites
Most of the liability recognised in respect of leased cell sites relates to multi-site arrangements with commercial providers. The fixed-term nature of these arrangements means it has not been necessary to exercise significant judgement when determining the lease term. Where the arrangements offer extension options we have been required to conclude whether the options are reasonably certain to be exercised. Although the balance sheet could be materially affected by the conclusion reached in regard to these options, we have not been required to exercise a significant degree of judgement in arriving at the lease term having regard to the period of time covered by the options, the difficulty in predicting the group’s long-term network requirements, and the relatively high threshold that ‘reasonably certain' represents. A smaller proportion of the cell site liability relates to arrangements with individual landlords which are either rolling or can be exited with notice. When setting the initial lease term for these arrangements we exercised significant judgement in establishing the period that we are reasonably certain to require use of the site. We broadly aligned lease terms with our medium-term planning horizon after assessing the relative strengths of the following factors:
– Long-term economic incentives to remain on sites including existing capital improvements;
– A need to maintain flexibility in our ability to develop and manage our network infrastructure to react quickly to technological developments and evolving capacity requirements; and
– Incentives to renegotiate arrangements in the medium term to gain more security over sites to support future capital investment.
Although significant judgement has been exercised in determining the lease term, reaching an alternative conclusion would not have a material impact on the balance sheet having regard to the most feasible alternative lease terms. Subsequently, we consider key events that trigger reassessment of lease terms to be developments which resolve uncertainty around our economic incentive to remain on individual sites in the long term. These are primarily lease renegotiations and significant capital investments, for example that associated with our 5G rollout and other capital refresh programmes.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 177
Financial statements
Right-of-use assets
Most of our right-of-use assets are associated with our leased property portfolio, specifically our office, retail and exchange estate. We also lease a significant proportion of our network infrastructure, including mobile cell and switch sites.
| Network Land and buildings infrastructure | Motor vehicles | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 April 2022 | 3,941 | 110 | 369 | 9 |
| Additions | 203 | 16 | 150 | 2 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | (521) | (32) | (131) | (5) |
| Impairment b | (75) | — | — | — |
| Transfer to assets held for sale | (3) | — | — | — |
| Other movements | (49) | 1 | (3) | (1) |
| At 31 March 2023 | 3,496 | 95 | 385 | 5 |
| Additions | 271 | 40 | 179 | 1 |
| Depreciation charge for the year | (493) | (33) | (121) | (5) |
| Impairment b | (10) | — | — | — |
| Other movements | (108) | (4) | (56) | — |
| At 31 March 2024 | 3,156 | 98 | 387 | 1 |
a b c a b c a b c
a Additions comprise increases to right-of-use assets as a result of entering into new leases, and upwards remeasurement of existing leases arising from lease extensions or reassessments and increases to lease payments.
b Impairment charges relates primarily to the early exit of leases as a result of ongoing property rationalisation activity.
c Other movements primarily relate to terminated leases and downwards remeasurements of right-of-use assets arising from reductions or reassessments of lease terms and decreases in lease payments.
Lease liabilities
Lease liabilities recognised are as follows:
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | £m | £m |
| Current | 766 | 800 |
| Non-current | 4,189 | 4,559 |
| 4,955 | 5,359 |
The following amounts relating to the group’s obligations under lease arrangements were recognised in the income statement in the year:
– Interest expense of £134m (FY23: £133m) on lease liabilities.
– Variable lease payments of £39m (FY23: £38m) which are not dependent on an index or rate and which have not been included in the measurement of lease liabilities.
Expenses relating to leases of low-value assets and short-term leases for which no right-of-use asset or lease liability has been recognised were not material. The total cash outflow for leases in the year was £882m (FY23: £860m). Our cash flow statement and normalised free cash flow reconciliation present £748m (FY23: £727m) of the cash outflow as relating to the principal element of lease liability payments, with the remaining balance of £134m (FY23: £133m) presented within interest paid. Note 28 presents a maturity analysis of the payments due over the remaining lease term for lease liabilities currently recognised on the balance sheet. This analysis only includes payments to be made over the reasonably certain lease term. Cash outflows are likely to exceed these amounts as payments will be made on optional periods that we do not currently consider to be reasonably certain, and in respect of leases entered into in future periods.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 178
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
Other information relating to leases
At 31 March 2024 the group was committed to future minimum lease payments of £55m (FY23: £145m) in respect of leases which have not yet commenced and for which no lease liability has been recognised.
The following table analyses cash payments to be received across the remaining term of operating lease arrangements where BT is lessor:
| To be recognised as other revenue (note 5) | To be recognised as operating income (note 6) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2024 | £m | £m | £m |
| Less than one year | 431 | 17 | 448 |
| One to two years | 117 | 11 | 128 |
| Two to three years | 41 | 11 | 52 |
| Three to four years | 10 | 9 | 19 |
| Four to five years | 9 | 3 | 12 |
| More than five years | — | 5 | 5 |
| Total undiscounted lease payments | 608 | 56 | 664 |
| At 31 March 2023 | |||
| Less than one year | 416 | 19 | 435 |
| One to two years | 131 | 15 | 146 |
| Two to three years | 46 | 15 | 61 |
| Three to four years | 13 | 14 | 27 |
| Four to five years | 10 | 13 | 23 |
| More than five years | — | 20 | 20 |
| Total undiscounted lease payments | 616 | 96 | 712 |
a a Future operating lease income to be recognised as revenue primarily relates to income from Openreach's fixed access subscription services which meet the definition of leases under IFRS 16 and which typically are expected to have a lease period terms of one year or less.
Material accounting policies that apply to trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are recognised where the right to receive payment from customers is conditional only on the passage of time. We initially recognise trade and other receivables at fair value, which is usually the original invoiced amount. They are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The carrying amount of these balances approximates to fair value due to the short maturity of amounts receivable. We provide services to consumer and business customers, mainly on credit terms. We know that certain debts due to us will not be paid through the default of a small number of our customers.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
|---|---|---|
| Current | ||
| Trade receivables | 1,899 | 1,395 |
| Prepayments | 586 | 545 |
| Accrued income | 162 | 158 |
| Deferred contract costs | 383 | 369 |
| Finance lease receivables | 31 | 29 |
| Amounts due from joint ventures | 163 | 268 |
| Other assets | 341 | 296 |
| 3,565 | 3,060 | |
| Non-current | ||
| Deferred contract costs | 229 | 211 |
| Finance lease receivables | 107 | 98 |
| Other assets | 305 | 194 |
| 641 | 503 |
a Other assets comprise Flex Pay receivables, prepayments and £57m (FY23: £70m) of deferred cash consideration mainly relating to the disposal of BT Sport, see note 22. Amounts due from joint ventures relates to a sterling Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) provided to the Sports JV, see note 30. The expected loss provision is immaterial.
Trade receivables are stated after deducting allowances for doubtful debts, as follows:
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
| At 1 April | 168 | 223 |
| Expense | 129 | 84 |
| Utilised | (127) | (142) |
| Exchange differences | (1) | 3 |
| At 31 March | 169 | 168 |
The expected credit loss allowance for trade receivables was determined as follows:
| Past due and not specifically impaired | Trade receivables specifically impaired | Between 0 and 3 months | Between 3 and 6 months | Between 6 and 12 months | Over 12 months | Not past due | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2024 | ||||||||
| Expected loss rate % | 1% | 50% | 8% | 28% | 47% | 65% | 8% | |
| Gross carrying amount | 1,448 | 4 | 357 | 81 | 64 | 114 | 2,068 | |
| Loss allowance | (11) | (2) | (29) | (23) | (30) | (74) | (169) | |
| Net carrying amount | 1,437 | 2 | 328 | 58 | 34 | 40 | 1,899 | |
| 2023 | ||||||||
| Expected loss rate % | 1% | 75% | 10% | 46% | 41% | 52% | 11% | |
| Gross carrying amount | 1,030 | 20 | 265 | 48 | 59 | 141 | 1,563 | |
| Loss allowance | (8) | (15) | (26) | (22) | (24) | (73) | (168) | |
| Net carrying amount | 1,022 | 5 | 239 | 26 | 35 | 68 | 1,395 |
Trade receivables not past due and accrued income are analysed below by CFU.
| Trade receivables not past due | Accrued income | |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | |
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
| Consumer | 375 | 309 |
| Business | 900 | 713 |
| Openreach | 161 | — |
| Other | 1 | — |
| Total | 1,437 | 1,022 |
a Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit, formed through the merger of our Enterprise and Global units, see note 1. Given the broad and varied nature of our customer base, the analysis of trade receivables not past due and accrued income by CFU is considered the most appropriate disclosure of credit concentrations.
Material accounting policies that apply to deferred contract costs
We capitalise certain costs associated with the acquisition and fulfilment of contracts with customers and amortise them over the period that we transfer the associated services. Connection costs are deferred as contract fulfilment costs because they allow satisfaction of the associated connection performance obligation and are considered recoverable. Sales commissions and other third party contract acquisition costs are capitalised as costs to acquire a contract unless the associated contract term is less than 12 months, in which case they are expensed as incurred. Capitalised costs are amortised over the minimum contract term. A portfolio approach is used to determine contract term. Where the initial set-up, transition and transformation phases of long-term contractual arrangements represent distinct performance obligations, costs in delivering these services are expensed as incurred. Where these services are not distinct performance obligations, we capitalise eligible costs as a cost of fulfilling the related service. Capitalised costs are amortised on a straight-line basis over the remaining contract term, unless the pattern of service delivery indicates a more appropriate profile. To be eligible for capitalisation, costs must be directly attributable to specific contracts, relate to future activity, and generate future economic benefits. Capitalised costs are regularly assessed for recoverability.
The following table shows the movement on deferred costs:
| Deferred contract acquisition costs – Transition and transformation | Deferred contract acquisition costs – commissions | Deferred connection costs | Dealer incentives | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £m | |||||
| At 1 April 2022 | 24 | 124 | 324 | 90 | 562 |
| Additions | 15 | 100 | 285 | 70 | 470 |
| Amortisation | (15) | (94) | (276) | (67) | (452) |
| Impairment | — | (1) | (1) | — | (2) |
| Other | (2) | 2 | (2) | 4 | 2 |
| At 31 March 2023 | 22 | 131 | 330 | 97 | 580 |
| Additions | 10 | 134 | 315 | 57 | 516 |
| Amortisation | (11) | (118) | (292) | (56) | (477) |
| Impairment | — | (2) | (7) | — | (9) |
| Other | (8) | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| At 31 March 2024 | 13 | 147 | 349 | 103 | 612 |
We initially recognise trade and other payables at fair value, which is usually the original invoiced amount. We subsequently carry them at amortised cost using the effective interest method. We use a supply chain financing programme to extend payment terms with a limited number of suppliers to a more typical payment term. We also use a separate supply chain financing programme to allow suppliers to receive funding earlier than the invoice due date. We assess these arrangements against indicators to assess if debts which vendors have sold to the funder under the supplier financing schemes continue to meet the definition of trade payables or should be classified as borrowings. At 31 March 2024 under the terms of the arrangement the funder's payment to the supplier does not legally extinguish our obligation to the supplier so it remains within trade and other payables. Cash flows only occur when the trade payable is extinguished and are therefore presented in cash flows from operating activities.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
| Current | ||
| Trade payables | 4,119 | 4,196 |
| Other taxation and social security | 544 | 581 |
| Minimum guarantee with sports joint venture a | 194 | 195 |
| Accrued expenses | 543 | 458 |
| Deferred income | 355 | 532 |
| Other payables | 572 | 602 |
| 6,327 | 6,564 | |
| Non-current | ||
| Minimum guarantee with sports joint venture a | 271 | 465 |
| Deferred income | 342 | 403 |
| Other payables | 24 | 52 |
| 637 | 920 |
b c b a Liability recognised on the minimum revenue guarantee in BT’s distribution agreement with the sports joint venture (see note 22). Movement in the liability driven by £211m payments made during the year less £16m finance cost recorded from unwinding the impact of discounting. b Deferred income includes £106m (FY23: £258m) current and £122m (FY23: £169m) non-current liabilities relating to Building Digital UK, for which grants received by the group may be subject to re-investment or repayment depending on the level of take-up. c Includes £41m relating to an estimate of customer refunds, refer to note 5.
Current trade and other payables at 31 March 2024 include:
– £101m (31 March 2023: £348m) of trade payables that have been factored in a supply chain financing programme. The facility size of £350m remains consistent with prior periods. These programmes are used with a limited number of suppliers with short payment terms to extend them to a more typical payment term.
– £224m (31 March 2023: £169m) of trade payables in a separate supply chain financing programme that allows suppliers the opportunity to receive funding earlier than the invoice due date. Financial institutions are used to support this programme but we continue to recognise the underlying payables as we continue to cash settle the supplier invoices in accordance with their terms.
Our provisions principally relate to obligations arising from property rationalisation programmes, restructuring programmes, asset retirement obligations, network assets, third party claims, litigation and regulatory risks. Contingent liabilities primarily arise from litigation and regulatory matters that are not sufficiently certain to meet the criteria for recognition as provisions.
We recognise provisions when the group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated.# Provisions & Contingent Liabilities
Where these criteria are not met we disclose a contingent liability if the group has a possible obligation, or has a present obligation with an outflow that is not probable or which cannot be reliably estimated. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a nominal pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. Cash flows are adjusted for the effect of inflation where appropriate.
Contingent liabilities are not recognised as liabilities on our balance sheet. By their nature, contingencies will be resolved only when one or more uncertain future events occur or fail to occur. We assess the likelihood that a potential claim or liability will arise and also quantify the possible range of financial outcomes where this can be reasonably determined. In identifying contingent liabilities we make key judgements in relation to applicable law and any historical and pending court rulings, and the likelihood, timing and cost of resolution. Establishing contingent liabilities associated with litigation brought against the group may involve the use of significant judgements and assumptions, in particular around the ability to form a reliable estimate of any probable outflow. We provide further information in relation to specific matters in the ‘contingent liabilities' section below.
We exercise judgement in determining the quantum of all provisions to be recognised. Our assessment includes consideration of whether we have a present obligation, whether payment is probable and if so whether the amount can be estimated reliably. When measuring provisions we reflect the impact of inflation as appropriate, particularly in relation to our property, asset retirement obligation and third party claims provisions. Although this involves a degree of estimation, it does not represent a significant source of estimation uncertainty having regard to the quantum of the balances in question and the anticipated timing of outflows.
Property provisions relate to obligations arising in relation to our property portfolio, in particular costs to restore leased properties on vacation where this is required under the lease agreement. In measuring property provisions, we have made estimates of the costs associated with the restoration of properties by reference to any relevant guidance such as rate cards. Cash outflows occur as and when properties are vacated and the obligations are settled.
Asset retirement obligations (AROs) relate to obligations to dismantle equipment and restore network sites on vacation of the site. The provision represents the group’s best estimate of the costs to dismantle equipment and restore the sites. Obligations are settled as and when sites are vacated and the timing is largely influenced by the group’s network strategy.
Our regulatory provision represents our best estimate of the cost to settle our present obligation in relation to historical regulatory matters. The charge/credit for the year represents the outcome of management’s re-assessment of the estimates and regulatory risks across a range of issues, including price and service issues. The prices at which certain services are charged are regulated and may be subject to retrospective adjustment by regulators. When estimating the likely value of regulatory risk we make key judgements, including in regard to interpreting Ofcom regulations and past and current claims. The precise outcome of each matter depends on whether it becomes an active issue, and the extent to which negotiation or regulatory and compliance decisions will result in financial settlement. The ultimate liability may vary from the amounts provided and will be dependent upon the eventual outcome of any settlement.
Litigation provisions represent the best estimate to settle present obligations recognised in respect of claims brought against the group. The estimate reflects the specific facts and circumstances of each individual matter and any relevant external advice received. Provisions recognised are inherently judgemental and could change over time as matters progress.
Third party claims provisions (previously described as insurance provisions) represent our exposure to claims from third parties, with latent disease claims from former colleagues and motor vehicle claims making up the majority of the balance. We engage an independent actuary to provide an estimate of the most likely outcomes in respect of latent disease and third party motor vehicle accident claims, and our in-house insurance teams review our exposure to other risks.
Other provisions do not include any individually material provisions. For all risks, the ultimate liability may vary materially from the amounts provided and will be dependent upon the eventual outcome of any settlement.
| Network £m | Third party £m | Property £m | ARO £m | Regulatory £m | Litigation £m | Other £m | Total £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 April 2022 | 142 | 181 | 65 | 85 | 92 | 108 | 673 | |
| Additions | 43 | — | 16 | 6 | 35 | 15 | 115 | |
| Unwind of discount | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | 4 | |
| Utilised | (8) | (4) | (1) | (41) | (30) | (7) | (91) | |
| Released | (37) | (87) | (16) | (9) | (43) | (42) | (234) | |
| Transfers | — | — | 4 | — | 132 | (11) | 125 | |
| Exchange differences | 1 | — | — | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
| At 31 March 2023 | 142 | 93 | 68 | 44 | 187 | 64 | 598 | |
| Additions | 42 | 42 | 72 | — | 73 | 9 | 238 | |
| Unwind of discount | 1 | 4 | — | — | 1 | — | 6 | |
| Utilised | (15) | (6) | (37) | (1) | (75) | (3) | (137) | |
| Released | (17) | — | (17) | — | (32) | (3) | (69) | |
| Transfers | 4 | — | — | — | — | 10 | 14 | |
| Exchange differences | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | (1) | |
| At 31 March 2024 | 156 | 133 | 86 | 43 | 154 | 77 | 649 |
a a a Transfers relate to the reclassification of balances previously presented in other payables (note 17) following reassessment of the level of certainty over the timing and amount of any outflow of resources.
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | ||
| Analysed as: | ||
| Current | 238 | 229 |
| Non-current | 411 | 369 |
| 649 | 598 |
In the ordinary course of business, we are periodically notified of actual or threatened litigation, and regulatory and compliance matters and investigations. We have disclosed below a number of such matters including any matters where we believe a material adverse impact on the operations or financial condition of the group is possible and the likelihood of a material outflow of resources is more than remote. Where the outflow of resources is considered probable, and a reasonable estimate can be made of the amount of that obligation, a provision is recognised for these amounts and reflected in the table above. Where an outflow is not probable but is possible, or a reasonable estimate of the obligation cannot be made, a contingent liability exists. In respect of each of the claims below, the nature and progression of such proceedings and investigations can make it difficult to predict the impact they will have on the group. There are many reasons why we cannot make these assessments with certainty, including, among others, that they are in early stages, no damages or remedies have been specified, and/or the often slow pace of litigation.
In January 2021, Justin Le Patourel, represented by law firm Mishcon de Reya applied to the Competition Appeal Tribunal to bring a proposed class action claim for damages they estimated at £608m (inclusive of compound interest) or £589m (inclusive of simple interest) alleging anti-competitive behaviour through excessive pricing by BT to customers with certain residential landline services. Ofcom considered this topic in 2017. At that time, Ofcom’s final statement made no finding of excessive pricing or breach of competition law more generally but we implemented a voluntary commitment to reduce prices for customers that have a BT landline only and not to increase those prices beyond inflation (CPI). In September 2021 the Competition Appeal Tribunal certified the claim to proceed to a substantive trial on an opt-out basis (class members are automatically included in the claim unless they choose to opt-out). In July 2023 Justin Le Patourel amended his claim seeking increased damages estimated at £1,338m (inclusive of compound interest) or £1,309m (inclusive of simple interest), later revised to £1,307m (inclusive of compound interest) or £1,278m (inclusive of simple interest). A hearing took place between January and March 2024 and we are awaiting judgment. At the reporting date we are not aware of any evidence to indicate that a present obligation exists such that any amount should be provided for.
In November 2023, Justin Gutmann, represented by law firm Charles Lyndon applied to the Competition Appeal Tribunal to bring a proposed class action claim for damages estimated at £1.1bn (inclusive of simple interest) on behalf of customers who purchased combined handset and airtime contracts who are outside their minimum contract terms but who continue to pay the same price as during their minimum contract terms. The claim alleges this approach was an anti-competitive abuse of a dominant position. Similar claims have also been brought against Vodafone, Three and O2 with the total damages claimed £3.285bn (inclusive of simple interest). At the reporting date we are not aware of any evidence to indicate that a present obligation exists such that any amount should be provided for. Class actions must be certified by the Competition Appeal Tribunal at a Collective Proceedings Order (CPO) hearing before proceeding to a substantive trial. A first case management conference to determine next procedural steps is scheduled for 23 May 2024. If the class action is certified the substantive trial will not conclude during FY25. BT intends to defend itself vigorously.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 184
Italian business Milan Public Prosecutor prosecutions: In FY20 proceedings were initiated against BT Italia for certain potential offences, namely the charge of having adopted, from 2011 to 2016, an inadequate management and control organisation model for the purposes of Articles 5 and 25 of Legislative Decree 231/2001. BT Italia disputed this and maintained in a defence brief filed in April 2019 that: (a) BT Italia did not gain any interest or benefit from the conduct in question; and (b) in any event, it had a sufficient organisational, management and audit model that was circumvented/overridden by individuals acting in their own self-interest. The trial commenced on 26 January 2021. On 23 April 2021, the Court allowed some parties to be joined to the criminal proceedings as civil parties (‘parte civile’) – a procedural feature of the Italian criminal law system. These claims were directed at certain individual defendants (which include former BT/ BT Italia employees). Those parties successfully joined BT Italia as a respondent to their civil claims (‘responsabile civile’) on the basis that it is vicariously responsible for the individuals’ wrongdoing. The first instance phase of the trial has now concluded with the Court handing down its decision on 25 January 2024. The Court convicted certain individuals (including certain former BT Italia employees) for manipulation of BT Italia’s financial statements for the financial year ending 31 March 2016 and for fraud against an Italian company, Sed Multitel S.r.l. The Court dismissed all charges that had been brought against BT Italia but ordered that BT Italia indemnify certain individual minority shareholders in the company and Sed Multitel for their losses. The Court has not quantified the indemnification amount, such that the indemnified parties must now seek to recover these amounts from BT Italia by agreement or separate civil proceedings. The quantum of those claims, if they are pursued successfully, is not anticipated to be material.
Accounting misstatement claims: a law firm acting on behalf of a group of investors has made claims under s.90A of the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000, alleging that untrue or misleading statements were made in relation to the historical irregular accounting practices in BT’s Italian business (which have been the subject of previous disclosures). No value is stated and the matter is in the early stages. As mentioned in our earlier reports, the accounting issues in Italy have previously been the subject of class actions in the US that were dismissed by the US courts.
Phones 4U Since 2015 the administrators of Phones 4U Limited have made allegations that EE and other mobile network operators colluded to procure Phones 4U’s insolvency. Legal proceedings for an unquantified amount were issued in December 2018 by the administrators. The trial on the question of liability/breach ran from May to July 2022. In November 2023 the High Court dismissed Phones 4U’s claim in its entirety. Phones 4U has subsequently appealed that judgment to the Court of Appeal and a hearing is expected in May 2025. We continue to dispute these allegations vigorously.
UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) investigation On 12 July 2022 the CMA opened a competition law investigation into BT and other companies involved in the purchase of freelance services for the production and broadcasting of sports content in the UK. The investigation is focused on BT Sport. In February 2023, the CMA extended its investigation to include suspected breaches of competition law in relation to the employment of staff supporting the production and broadcasting of sports content in the UK however in March 2024 the CMA confirmed this limb of its investigation would not be progressed. The CMA has said no assumption should be made at this stage that competition law has been infringed. BT is cooperating with the investigation.
Background to BT Group’s pension plans
The group has both Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution retirement benefit plans. The group’s main plans are in the UK:
– The BT Pension Scheme (BTPS) is the largest UK Defined Benefit plan sponsored by BT Group, constituting 97% of BT Group’s IAS 19 liability. It was closed to future benefit accrual in 2018 for the majority of members, and has 55,000 deferred members and 210,000 pensioners. All BTPS members receive pension benefits at retirement based on salary and years of service; some members also receive a lump sum payment at retirement. Increases for the majority of benefits are linked to either the Retail Price Index (RPI) or the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
– The EE Pension Scheme (EEPS) has a Defined Benefit section that was closed to future benefit accrual in 2014 and a Defined Contribution section which was closed to future accrual in July 2023. The Defined Benefit section constitutes 2% of BT Group’s IAS 19 liability.
– The BT Retirement Saving Scheme (BTRSS) is a Defined Contribution, contract-based, plan operated by Standard Life which new UK employees join. There are around 67,000 employees currently contributing to the BTRSS.
The group also has retirement arrangements around the world in line with local markets and culture; the principal ones being in the Netherlands and Germany.
Types of retirement benefit plans
Defined Benefit (DB) plans
DB plan benefits are determined by the plan rules, typically dependent on factors such as years of service and pensionable pay, but not on the value of actual contributions made by the group or members. The group is exposed to investment and other experience risks and may need to make additional contributions where it is estimated that the benefits will not be met from assets held, regular contributions and expected investment income. The net defined benefit liability, or deficit, is the present value of all expected future benefit cash flows to be paid by each plan, calculated using the projected unit credit method by professionally qualified actuaries (also known as the Defined Benefit Obligation, DBO or liabilities) less the fair value of the plan assets. A net defined benefit asset, or surplus, occurs when the fair value of assets exceeds the liabilities.
Defined Contribution (DC) plans
DC plan benefits are linked to the value of each member’s fund, which is based on contributions paid and the performance of each individual’s chosen investments. The group has no exposure to investment and other experience risks (including longevity).
Amounts in the financial statements
Group income statement
The expense arising from the group’s retirement benefit arrangements as recognised in the group income statement is shown below.
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | ||||
| Year ended 31 March | |||||
| Recognised in the income statement before specific items (note 6) | |||||
| – Service cost: | |||||
| – DB plans | 12 | 17 | |||
| – DC plans | 541 | 537 | |||
| – Past service cost/(credit) | — | (2) | |||
| – Administration expenses and PPF levy | 29 | 38 | |||
| Subtotal | 582 | 590 | |||
| Recognised in the income statement as specific items (note 9) | |||||
| – Costs to close BTPS and provide transition payments a for | |||||
| affected employees | — | 13 | |||
| – Interest on pensions deficit | 121 | 18 | |||
| Subtotal | 121 | 31 | |||
| Total recognised in the income statement | 703 | 621 |
a All employees impacted by the closure of the BTPS were eligible for transition payments from the date of closure into their BTRSS pot for a period linked to the employee’s age.
Group balance sheet
The net defined benefit liability in respect of defined benefit plans reported in the group balance sheet is set out below. Plans in surplus are presented within non-current assets and plans in deficit within non-current liabilities.
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surplus/ (Deficit) a | Assets | Liabilities | Surplus/ (Deficit) a | Assets | Liabilities | |
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| At 31 March | ||||||
| Recognised in non-current liabilities | ||||||
| BTPS | (4,647) | 35,391 | (40,038) | (2,902) | 38,673 | (41,575) |
| Unfunded plans | (88) | — | (88) | (92) | — | (92) |
| Other funded plans | (147) | 33 | (180) | (145) | 65 | (210) |
| Sub-total | (4,882) | 35,424 | (40,306) | (3,139) | 38,738 | (41,877) |
| Recognised in non-current assets | ||||||
| EEPS | 59 | 769 | (710) | 36 | 749 | (713) |
| Funded plans | 11 | 361 | (350) | 16 | 321 | (305) |
| Sub-total | 70 | 1,130 | (1,060) | 52 | 1,070 | (1,018) |
| Total | (4,812) | 36,554 | (41,366) | (3,087) | 39,808 | (42,895) |
a Figures shown net of a £4m adjustment in relation to IFRIC 14. With the exception of some of the group's smaller plans, the group is not required to limit any pension surplus or recognise additional pension liabilities in individual plans as economic benefits are available in the form of either future refunds or reductions to future contributions. For example, a refund of surplus is available following the gradual settlement of the liabilities over time when there are no members remaining in the BTPS or EEPS. The table below shows the group’s defined benefit liability net of tax.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
| Balance sheet position (net of tax) | ||
| Surplus/(deficit) | (4,812) | (3,087) |
| Deferred tax asset (note 10) | 968 | 618 |
| Total (net of tax) | (3,844) | (2,469) |
Movements in defined benefit plan assets and liabilities
The table below shows the movements in the defined benefit plan assets and liabilities and shows where they are reflected in the financial statements.# Financial statements
| Assets £m | Liabilities £m | Deficit £m |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2022 | 54,937 | (56,080) |
| Service cost (including administration expenses and PPF levy) | (38) | (17) |
| Past service credit | — | 2 |
| Interest on net pension deficit | 1,480 | (1,498) |
| Included in the group income statement | (71) | |
| Return on plan assets below the amount included in the group income statement | (14,911) | — |
| Actuarial gain arising from changes in financial assumptions | — | 12,279 |
| Actuarial gain arising from changes in demographic assumptions | — | 891 |
| Actuarial (loss) arising from experience adjustments | — | (1,135) |
| Included in the group statement of comprehensive income | (2,876) | |
| Regular contributions by employer | 22 | — |
| Deficit contributions by employer | 994 | — |
| Included in the group cash flow statement | 1,016 | |
| Contributions by employees | 1 | (1) |
| Benefits paid | (2,686) | 2,686 |
| Other (e.g. foreign exchange) | 9 | (22) |
| Other movements | (13) | |
| At 31 March 2023 | 39,808 | (42,895) |
| Service cost (including administration expenses and PPF levy) | (29) | (12) |
| Past service credit | — | — |
| Interest on net pension deficit | 1,886 | (2,007) |
| Included in the group income statement | (162) | |
| Return on plan assets below the amount included in the group income statement | (3,140) | — |
| Actuarial gain arising from changes in financial assumptions | — | 563 |
| Actuarial gain arising from changes in demographic assumptions | — | 652 |
| Actuarial (loss) arising from experience adjustments | — | (519) |
| Included in the group statement of comprehensive income | (2,444) | |
| Regular contributions by employer | 55 | — |
| Deficit contributions by employer | 823 | — |
| Included in the group cash flow statement | 878 | |
| Contributions by employees | — | — |
| Benefits paid | (2,840) | 2,840 |
| Other (e.g. foreign exchange) | (9) | 12 |
| Other movements | 3 | |
| At 31 March 2024 | 36,554 | (41,366) |
Primarily reflects the impact on the liabilities of actual inflation being higher than assumed at the prior reporting date, which has been broadly offset by increases to inflation-linked assets from higher inflation.
BT Pension Scheme Trustees Limited (the Trustee) has been appointed by BT Group as an independent trustee to administer and manage the BTPS on behalf of the members in accordance with the terms of the BTPS Trust Deed and Rules and relevant legislation (principally the Pensions Acts of 1993, 1995, 2004 and 2021). The Trustee’s key powers include setting the investment strategy of BTPS (after consultation with BT Group) and agreeing with BT Group the actuarial assumptions to be used when assessing the BTPS funding position and the resulting contributions that will be paid. There are nine Trustee directors, all of whom are appointed by BT Group, as illustrated below. Trustee directors are usually appointed for a three-year term but are then eligible for re-appointment.
| Trustee directors | Description |
|---|---|
| Chair of the Trustee directors | Appointed by BT. |
| Member nominated Trustee directors | Appointed by BT after consultation with, and with the agreement of, the relevant trade unions. Appointed by BT based on nominations by trade unions. |
| Employer nominated Trustee directors | Appointed by BT. Two normally hold senior positions within the group and two normally hold (or have held) senior positions in commerce or industry. |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 187
Financial statements | 19. Retirement benefit plans continued
Critical accounting estimates and significant judgements made when valuing the BTPS assets
Under IAS 19, plan assets are measured at fair value at the balance sheet date and include quoted and unquoted investments.
Valuation of main quoted investments
Valuation of main unquoted investments
A portion of unquoted investments are valued based on inputs that are not directly observable, which require more judgement. The assumptions used in valuing unquoted investments are affected by market conditions.
£5.7bn of unquoted investments that are formally valued periodically by the investment manager have a latest valuation that precedes the balance sheet date. These assets consist of: £2.4bn non-core credit; £1.0bn mature infrastructure; £1.2bn private equity; £0.9bn secure income assets; and £0.2bn property. These valuations have been adjusted for cash movements between the previous valuation date and 31 March 2024. The valuation approach and inputs for these investments would only be approximately updated where there were indications of significant movements, for example implied by public market indicators. No such adjustment was required at 31 March 2024.
Asset-Backed Funding (ABF) arrangement
The ABF arrangement, issued to the BTPS in May 2021, has a fair value of £1.2bn at 31 March 2024 (FY23: £1.3bn) calculated as the present value of the future stream of payments, allowing for the probability of the BTPS becoming fully funded and therefore the payments to the BTPS ending early. It is not recognised as a pension asset when measuring the group’s IAS 19 net defined benefit liability as it is a non-transferable financial instrument issued by the group.
The Trustee regularly reviews the allocation of assets between different investment classes, taking into account current market conditions and trends. The allocations reflect the Trustee’s views on a range of areas, including:
i) the balance between seeking returns and incurring risk;
ii) the extent to which the assets should be allocated to match movements in the liabilities due to changes in interest rates, inflation and/or longevity (i.e. liability-driven investments, or LDI);
iii) the extent to which the assets should provide cash flows to meet expected payments to beneficiaries; and
iv) liquidity needed to meet benefit payments and collateral requirements for derivatives contracts.
Financial derivatives (e.g. swaps) are used to reduce the mismatch between movements in the liabilities and the assets from changes in interest rates, inflation, longevity, and exchange rates. This provides greater stability in the funding position, and therefore the deficit contributions that may be required from BT Group. The sensitivity chart on page 194 shows how the use of some of these derivatives adjusts outcomes for the BTPS. While the use of derivatives reduces funding risk, it increases the BTPS’s liquidity requirements which is factored into the overall investment strategy. Following the impact of the September 2022 mini-budget on derivatives, the Bank of England and the Pensions Regulator issued guidance on the minimum level of collateral pension schemes should hold. At 31 March 2024 (and 31 March 2023), the BTPS held more collateral than these minimum levels.
The table below analyses the fair value of the BTPS assets by asset category, subdivided by valuations based on a quoted market price in an active market, and those that are not (such as investment funds).
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 188
Financial statements | Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued | 19.## 19. Retirement benefit plans continued
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £bn | £bn | £bn | £bn | ||
| Total | assets | Total | assets | ||
| Growth Equities | UK | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | — |
| Overseas Developed | 2.3 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.6 | |
| Emerging Markets | — | — | — | — | |
| Private Equity | 1.3 | — | 1.1 | — | |
| Property | UK | 2.3 | — | 2.6 | — |
| Overseas | 0.6 | — | 0.8 | — | |
| Other growth assets | Absolute Return | 1.2 | — | 0.9 | — |
| Non-Core Credit | 4.2 | 0.4 | 4.2 | 0.4 | |
| Mature Infrastructure | 1.0 | — | 1.2 | — | |
| Liability matching | Government bonds UK | 14.6 | 14.5 | 13.2 | 13.1 |
| Investment grade credit Global | 10.3 | 7.7 | 10.4 | 8.2 | |
| Secure income assets | 4.0 | — | 3.7 | — | |
| Cash, derivatives and other | Cash balances | 0.8 | — | 3.0 | — |
| Financial derivative contracts | (4.9) | — | (4.2) | — | |
| Longevity insurance contract f | (0.9) | — | (0.8) | — | |
| Other h | (1.5) | — | 0.8 | — | |
| Total | 35.4 | 23.7 | 38.7 | 22.3 |
a At 31 March 2024, the BTPS held nil (FY23: nil) equity issued by the group and £1.7bn (FY23: £1.6bn) of bonds issued by the group.
b This allocation seeks to generate a positive return in all market conditions.
c This allocation includes a range of credit investments, including emerging market, sub-investment grade and unrated credit. The allocation seeks to exploit investment opportunities within credit markets using the expertise of a range of specialist investment managers.
d Around 77% (FY23: 72%) of these are index-linked gilts with the remainder in conventional gilts.
e This allocation consists of assets which aim to provide the BTPS with contractual bond-like income, often inflation-protected. The assets include property, infrastructure and investment-grade private credit.
f The value reflects experience to date on the contract from higher than expected deaths; this has partly offset a corresponding reduction in BTPS’s liabilities over the same period.
g Other balances comprise net amounts receivable/(payable) by the BTPS, including balances due to investment counterparties relating to repurchase agreements.
h Of which held in the co-investment vehicle: £0.1bn (FY23: <£1m).
The measurement of the service cost and the liabilities involves judgement about uncertain events including the life expectancy of members, price inflation and the discount rate used to calculate the net present value of the future pension payments. We use estimates for all of these uncertain events. Our assumptions reflect historical experience, market expectations (where relevant), actuarial advice and our judgement regarding future expectations at the balance sheet date. While assumptions are made for these events, actual benefit payments in a given year may be higher or lower than the assumption, for example if members retire sooner or later than assumed. The liabilities are the present value of the future expected benefit payments.
There are c.265,000 members, and their dependants, who will be receiving benefits from the BTPS for the remainder of their lives. Members currently receiving pension benefits make up around 73% of the liabilities and 79% of the membership by number.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 189
Financial statements
The chart below illustrates how the forecast benefits payable from the BTPS, and IAS 19 liabilities, projected using the IAS 19 assumptions evolve over time. The estimated duration of the BTPS liabilities, which is an indicator of the weighted average term of the discounted future payments, is 11 years (FY23: 12 years) using the IAS 19 assumptions. The duration is sensitive to the assumptions and has reduced mainly due to the increase in bond yields, and therefore discount rate, over the year.
The most significant financial assumptions used to calculate the IAS 19 liabilities for the BTPS are the discount rate and inflation. The most significant demographic assumption used is how life expectancy will evolve over time which is illustrated as forecast life expectancies in the table below.
| At 31 March 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discount rate | 4.90% | 4.85% |
| Inflation – RPI | 3.25% | 3.35% |
| Inflation – CPI | 2.80% | 2.85% |
| Life expectancy – male aged 60 in lower pension bracket | 24.9 years | 24.7 years |
| Life expectancy – male aged 60 in higher pension bracket | 26.7 years | 26.9 years |
| Life expectancy – female aged 60 | 27.4 years | 27.5 years |
| Average additional life expectancy for a male member retiring at age 60 in 10 years’ time | 0.4 years | 0.4 years |
While the financial assumptions are typically scheme-specific, the average financial assumptions weighted by liabilities across all schemes are within 0.05% of the figures shown in the table above.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 190
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
The table below summarises how these assumptions have been set, including key changes over the year.
| Detail | Similarly, in a deflationary environment, the asset values are expected to fall by more than the IAS 19 liabilities and funding liabilities since the payments on index-linked gilts would be reduced but pensions paid by the BTPS would not necessarily fall to fully offset the fall in asset values.
The BTPS primarily holds RPI inflation-linked assets and derivatives to hedge inflation-linked benefits. Around two-thirds of the inflation-linked benefits increase with reference to CPI. A 0.25% a year increase in CPI inflation expectations before 2030 (with no corresponding change in RPI inflation expectations) would increase the IAS 19 deficit by around £0.3bn as at 31 March 2024.
A significant proportion of the BTPS assets are invested in growth assets, such as equities and property. The BTPS has temporary hedges in place to partly offset the impact of a fall in equity markets, and adopts a diverse portfolio. A fall in these growth assets will increase the IAS 19 and funding deficit.
An increase in the life expectancy of members will result in benefits being paid out for longer, leading to an increase in the IAS 19 liabilities and funding liabilities. The BTPS holds two longevity insurance contracts which covers around 32% of the BTPS’s total exposure to improvements in longevity, providing long-term protection and income to the BTPS in the event that members live longer than currently expected.
Other risks include: changes in legislation or regulation which impact the value of the liabilities or assets; and member take-up of options before and at retirement to reshape their benefits. The scale of the BTPS means that investment changes and any future de-risking actions need to be planned and executed carefully, potentially over an extended timeframe or multiple transactions.
The potential negative impact of these risks is illustrated by the following five scenarios. These have been assessed by BT Group’s independent actuary as scenarios that might occur no more than once in every 20 years. The scenarios have been updated to reflect market experience over the last year.
1-in-20 events
| Scenario | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Fall in bond yields | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| 2. Increase in credit spreads | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| 3. Increase to average inflation expectations over the lifetime of the plan | c 1.1% | 1.1% |
| 4. Fall in growth assets | 15.0% | 20.0% |
| 5. Increase to life expectancy | 1.2 years | 1.3 years |
a Scenario assumes a fall in the yields on both government and corporate bonds.
b Scenario assumes an increase in the yield on corporate bonds, with no change to yield on government bonds.
c Scenario assumes average RPI and CPI inflation expectations over the lifetime of the plan increase by the same amount.
d Impact includes the dampening effect of temporary equity hedges held by the BTPS.
Scenario considers combinations of changes to the key inputs used to value the growth assets, leading to a 15% (FY23: 20%) fall in the aggregate value of the growth assets prior to temporary hedges held by the BTPS. The impact shown under each scenario looks at each event in isolation and reflects the liabilities, assets and investment strategy at 31 March 2024. In practice a combination of events could arise, and the effects are not additive nor are they linear (e.g. doubling the change in bond yields assumed will not double the impact). The asset allocation is not fixed and changes over the year may impact the sensitivities shown.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
192
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
19. Retirement benefit plans continued
The sensitivities have been prepared using the same approach as FY23 which involves calculating the liabilities and assets allowing for the change in market conditions assumed under the scenario as if they had occurred at the reporting date. The change in impact from FY23 is due to a combination of: changes in the scenarios, changes in asset and liability values over the year, and changes in the scheme’s investment strategy in line with the agreed de-risking plan.
A funding valuation is carried out for the Trustee by a professionally qualified independent actuary at least every three years. The funding valuation assesses the on-going financial health of the BTPS. If there are insufficient assets to meet the estimated future benefit payments to members (i.e. a funding deficit), BT Group and the Trustee agree the amount and timing of additional cash contributions. It is prepared using the principles set out in UK pension legislation, such as the 2004 and 2021 Pensions Acts, and uses a prudent approach overall when setting the actuarial assumptions. Some of the key differences compared to the IAS 19 deficit are set out in the table below.
| IAS 19 | Funding | |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Balance sheet in BT Group accounts | Assessing the on-going financial health and setting cash payments |
| Regulation | IFRS | UK pensions legislation |
| Frequency | Semi-annually | At least every three years |
| Key assumptions | Determined by BT Group | BT Group and BTPS agreement |
| Discount rate | Yield curve based on AA corporate bonds | Yield curve reflecting prudent return expected from BTPS assets |
| Other assumptions | Best estimate | Prudent overall approach |
| Assets | BT Group accounts excludes ABF value | Includes ABF value |
The different purpose and principles lead to different assumptions being used, and therefore a different estimate for the liabilities and deficit. The latest funding valuation was performed as at 30 June 2023. The next funding valuation will have an effective date of no later than 30 June 2026. The results of the two most recent triennial valuations are shown below.
| 30 June 2023 £bn | 30 June 2020 £bn | |
|---|---|---|
| Funding liabilities | (40.9) | (65.3) |
| Assets | 37.2 | 57.3 |
| BTPS Funding deficit | (3.7) | (8.0) |
| Percentage of accrued benefits covered by the BTPS assets at valuation date | 91 % | 88 % |
Key assumptions at valuation date:
* Discount rate a | 5.3 % | 1.4 % |
* Inflation – RPI | 3.6 % | 3.2 % |
* Inflation – CPI | 3.2 % | 2.4 % |
* Life expectancy – male aged 60 in lower pension bracket | 25.5 years | 25.8 years |
* Life expectancy – male aged 60 in higher pension bracket | 27.2 years | 28.0 years |
* Life expectancy – female aged 60 | 28.0 years | 28.5 years |
* Average additional life expectancy for a male member retiring at age 60 in 10 years’ time | 0.8 years | 0.9 years |
a The discount rate has been derived from prudent return expectations that reflect the investment strategy over time, allowing for the BTPS to de-risk to a portfolio consisting predominantly of bond and bond-like investments by 2034.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
193
Financial statements
19. Retirement benefit plans continued
The impact of changes in market conditions on the funding liabilities differs to the impact on the IAS 19 liabilities due to the size of the liabilities and how the assumptions are set. For example, the funding liabilities use a discount rate linked to a risk-free rate plus a margin based on the BTPS’s investment strategy, whereas the IAS 19 liabilities use a discount rate based on corporate bond yields. The chart below illustrates the approximate impact of the scenarios set on page 192 on the 30 June 2023 funding position. The figures shown in the table apply to the BTPS assets and funding liabilities as at 30 June 2023; an increase in the assets or funding liabilities will increase the impact of the scenarios shown.
In November 2023, the 2023 triennial funding valuation was finalised, agreed with the Trustee, and certified by the Scheme Actuary. The funding deficit at 30 June 2023 was £3.7bn, down from £8.0bn at the 2020 funding valuation following £4.4bn of deficit contributions. Annual contribution amounts remain unchanged, at £600m in each financial year until 31 March 2030, a final payment of £490m before 30 April 2030, and the £180m pa payments due under the ABF arrangement agreed at the 2020 valuation. No payments are currently payable under the future funding commitment (see page 195). These payments are summarised in the table below.
| Year to 31 March (£m) | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | 2032 | 2033 | 2034 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payments from BT plc | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 490 | — | — | — |
| Future funding commitment payments | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payments from ABF | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Total | 780 | 780 | 780 | 780 | 780 | 780 | 670 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
a Payments are due by 30 April each year.
b £10m is directly payable to the BTPS, and BT Group currently intends to pay the balance into the co-investment vehicle.
Under the ABF, £180m p.a. is paid into the BTPS until June 2033, secured on EE Limited. If the BTPS reaches full funding as calculated by the Scheme Actuary at any 30 June, the ABF payments to the BTPS will cease. BT Group received tax relief at inception of the ABF based on the original market value of £1.7bn, and will receive further tax-relief if payments are made to the BTPS in excess of this amount. Assuming they are all paid, future payments from the ABF have a present value of £1.3bn at 31 March 2024 (FY23: £1.4bn). The fair value of the ABF is £1.2bn at 31 March 2024 (FY23: £1.3bn) which allows for the probability of the BTPS becoming fully funded, and the payments to the BTPS ending early. The fair value of the ABF is included in the assets of the BTPS when assessing the funding deficit. Payments from the ABF to the BTPS are treated in the same way as coupon payments from bonds, and do not affect the funding deficit when they are paid. The fair value of the ABF is not included in the assets of the BTPS when assessing the IAS 19 deficit in the group consolidated accounts, as it is a non-transferable asset issued by the group. Payments from the ABF to the BTPS are treated as deficit contributions, and reduce the IAS 19 deficit, when they are paid.# Co-investment vehicle
A co-investment vehicle was set up in 2021 which provides BT Group with some protection against the risk of overfunding and therefore enables BT Group to provide upfront funding with greater confidence. BT Group is eligible for future refunds if some or all of the co- investment vehicle funds are surplus to the BTPS’s requirements, unless the BTPS, acting prudently but reasonably, decides to defer or reduce these payments. Assessments will be carried out over a series of dates between June 2032 and June 2041. Payments made by BT Group into the co-investment vehicle will be invested as if part of the overall BTPS investment strategy. BT Group will receive tax relief in respect of any funds paid to the BTPS from the vehicle but does not receive tax relief when payments are made to the co-investment vehicle.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 194
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
The fair value of assets in the co-investment vehicle, £0.1bn at 31 March 2024 (FY23: <£1m), is included in the assets of the BTPS when assessing both the IAS 19 and funding deficits.
BT Group has agreed to provide the Trustee with certain protections to 2035.
| Feature | Detail # BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
Our plans include savings-related share option plans for employees and those of participating subsidiaries and several share plans for executives. All share-based payment plans are equity-settled. Details of these plans are set out below.
Under HMRC-approved savings-related share option plans, employees save on a monthly basis, over a three- or five-year period, towards the purchase of shares at a fixed price determined when the option is granted. This price is set at a 20% discount to the market price for five-year plans and 10% for three-year plans. The options must be exercised within six months of maturity of the savings contract, otherwise they lapse. Similar plans operate for our overseas employees. The scheme did not operate in FY24 or FY23.
In FY21 and FY22, all eligible employees of the group were awarded £500 of BT shares. The shares are held in trust for a three-year vesting period after which they will be transferred to employees, providing they have been continuously employed during that time. A similar plan operated for overseas employees. Under the terms of Yourshare and the executive share plans, dividends are reinvested in shares that are added to the relevant share awards, unless the employee has elected to receive dividends in cash.
Awards are granted annually to selected senior employees where part of their bonus is awarded in shares in the group. These shares vest after three years.
Awards are granted to selected employees. Shares in the group are transferred to participants at the end of a specified retention or restricted period if they continue to be employed by the group throughout that period.
Under this scheme, certain employees were awarded shares if the group met performance measures linked to total shareholder return, normalised free cash flow and revenue growth over a three year period. The last ISP was granted in 2019 and vested in 2022.
Movements in Employee Saveshare options are shown below.
| 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | Year ended 31 March | |||
| £m | £m | millions | millions | |
| Outstanding at 1 April | 13 | 21 | 269 | 342 |
| Granted | — | — | — | — |
| Forfeited | — | — | (23) | (42) |
| Exercised | — | — | (64) | (5) |
| Expired | — | — | (26) | (26) |
| Outstanding at 31 March | 13 | 12 | 156 | 269 |
| Exercisable at 31 March | — | — | — | — |
| pence | pence | |||
| 102 | 102 | |||
| 118 | 130 | |||
| 89 | 96 | |||
| 151 | 208 | |||
| 103 | 102 | |||
| — | — |
The weighted average share price for all options exercised during FY24 was 118p (FY23: 153p).
The following table summarises information relating to options outstanding and exercisable under Employee Saveshare plans at 31 March 2024.
| Normal dates of vesting and exercise (based on calendar years) | Weighted average exercise price per share | Number of outstanding millions | Weighted average remaining life (months) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 164p | 27 | 10 |
| 2025 | 82p | 129 | 22 |
| Total | 96p | 156 | 20 |
Movements in executive share plan awards are shown below:
| ISP | DBP | RSP | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 April 2022 | 31 | 22 | 58 | 111 |
| Awards granted | — | 6 | 29 | 35 |
| Awards vested | (5) | (5) | (4) | (14) |
| Awards lapsed | (26) | (1) | (7) | (34) |
| Dividend shares reinvested | — | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| At 31 March 2023 | — | 24 | 80 | 104 |
| Awards granted | — | 6 | 42 | 48 |
| Awards vested | — | (10) | (27) | (37) |
| Awards lapsed | — | (1) | (8) | (9) |
| Dividend shares reinvested | — | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| At 31 March 2024 | — | 20 | 93 | 113 |
There were no grants under Employee Saveshare or the ISP in FY24 or FY23. Volatility has been determined by reference to BT’s historical volatility which is expected to reflect the BT share price in the future. An expected life of six months after vesting date is assumed for Employee Saveshare options. The risk-free interest rate is based on the UK gilt curve in effect at the time of the grant, for the expected life of the option. The fair values for the DBP and RSP were determined using the market price of the shares at the grant date. The weighted average share price for DBP awards granted in FY24 was 135p (FY23: 188p) and for RSP awards granted in FY24 was 112p (FY23: 183p).
We classify non-current assets or a group of assets and associated liabilities, forming a disposal group, as ‘held for sale’ when their carrying amount will be recovered principally through disposal rather than continuing use and the sale is highly probable. Sale is considered to be highly probable when management are committed to a plan to sell the asset or disposal group and the sale should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed divestment within one year from the date of classification. We measure non-current assets or disposal groups classified as held for sale at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs of disposal. Intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets classified as held for sale are not depreciated or amortised. Upon completion of a divestment, we recognise a profit or loss on disposal calculated as the difference between (i) the aggregate of the fair value of the consideration received and the fair value of any retained interest less costs incurred in disposing of the asset or disposal group and (ii) the carrying amount of the asset or disposal group (including goodwill). The profit or loss on disposal is recognised as a specific item, see note 9. In the event that non-current assets or disposal groups held for sale form a separate and identifiable major line of business, the results for both the current and comparative periods are reclassified as ‘discontinued operations’.
During the year, we completed the disposals of certain city fibre networks and associated infrastructure assets in Germany and Pelipod Limited, both of which were classified as held for sale in FY23, and the disposal of BT Enia, a subsidiary of BT Italia. We recognised a net profit on disposal after tax of £25m through specific items from these divestments, see below for further details. In FY23, we completed the disposal of BT Sport operations through forming a sports joint venture (Sports JV) with Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) recognising a profit on disposal after tax of £28m through specific items. During the current year, we recorded £10m additional net transaction costs through specific items and received £24m from the deferred cash consideration recorded at completion of the transaction. The disposals in the current or prior year have not been reclassified as discontinued operations as they do not meet our definition of a separate major line of business.
The net consideration recognised on completion of these divestments was as follows:
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Intangible assets, including allocated goodwill of £18m (FY23: £83m) | 19 | 88 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 13 | 13 |
| Right-of-use assets | 3 | 1 |
| Other assets | 8 | 760 |
| Liabilities | (8) | (357) |
| Net assets of operations disposed | 35 | 505 |
| Net financial liabilities recognised | — | 534 |
| Net impact on the consolidated balance sheet | 35 | 1,039 |
| Profit on disposal, after tax (note 9) | 25 | 28 |
| Net consideration from divestments completed in the year | 60 | 1,067 |
| Additional net transaction costs on the BT Sport disposal (note 9) | (10) | — |
| Net consideration | 50 | 1,067 |
| Satisfied by | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | |
| Proceeds received in the year per the cash flow statement | 81 | 29 |
| Deferred cash consideration on BT Sport disposal | (24) | 70 |
| Deferred cash consideration from other divestments | 5 | — |
| Transaction costs | (2) | (35) |
| Investment in A preference shares in Sports JV (note 24) | — | 428 |
| Investment in C preference shares in Sports JV | — | 161 |
| Ordinary equity interest in Sports JV (note 24) | — | 414 |
| Net consideration from divestments completed in the year | 60 | 1,067 |
| Additional net transaction costs on the BT Sport disposal (note 9) | (10) | — |
| Net consideration | 50 | 1,067 |
In August 2022 the group formed a sports joint venture (Sports JV) with Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) combining BT Sport and WBD’s Eurosport UK business.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
As part of the transaction, the group’s wholly owned subsidiary, British Telecommunications plc (BT plc or BT) and WBD each contributed, sub-licensed or delivered the benefit of their respective sports rights and distribution businesses for the UK & Ireland to the Sports JV. Both parties each hold a 50% interest and equal voting rights in the Sports JV. BT Sport’s distribution agreement with Virgin Media transferred to the Sports JV, and the Sports JV also entered into an agreement with Sky extending beyond 2030 to provide for its distribution of the Sports JV’s combined sports content. The production and operational assets of BT Sport transferred to WBD who manage and operate the production of the Sports JV’s sport content. BT plc entered into a distribution agreement with the Sports JV to procure the sport content required to continue to supply our broadband, TV and mobile customers. BT plc’s agreement with the Sports JV will extend beyond 2030 and the first four years includes a minimum revenue guarantee of approximately £500m per annum, after which the agreement will change to a fully variable arrangement. BT no longer has control of the BT Sport operations based on the assessment of ownership and joint control over the key decisions of the Sports JV (50/50 with WBD) established through the Sports JV agreement. The group’s retained ordinary equity interest in the combined business has been classified as a joint venture under IFRS 11, see note 24. WBD have the option to acquire BT plc’s 50% interest in the Sports JV at specified points during the first four years of the Sports JV (Call Option). The price payable under the Call Option will be 50% of the fair market value of the Sports JV to be determined at the time of the exercise, plus any unpaid fixed consideration and remaining earn-out as described below. If the Call Option is not exercised, BT plc will have the ability to exit its shareholding in the Sports JV either through a sale or IPO after the initial four-year period.
The following critical and key accounting estimates and significant judgements were made in accounting for the BT Sport disposal in FY23 only and are not considered to be ongoing significant judgements.
See note 24 for assessment of control.
BT will receive an earn-out from the Sports JV (subject to liquidity and usual UK company law requirements), which will end at the earliest of:
– four years post completion of the transaction;
– the exercise by WBD of the Call Option; and
– if the earn-out reaches an agreed cap.
The earn-out cash flows to BT are dependent on the cash profit generation of the Sports JV over the earn-out period and is therefore akin to contingent consideration, initially recorded at a fair value of £428m reflecting the present value of expected cash flows. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the group’s carried forward investment in A preference shares are remeasured to fair value at each reporting date in accordance with IFRS 9, see note 24.
BT plc’s obligation under the minimum revenue guarantee of c. £2bn over the first four years of the Sports JV represents both a trading arrangement on market terms and a financing arrangement for the off-market element of the revenue guarantee, which has been recorded as a financial liability at an initial fair value of £712m. The valuation of this financial liability, and what a fair cost-per-subscriber would be, is sensitive to a number of assumptions on volumes and price, and there is a range of outcomes which we could have arrived at. Alternative scenarios considered, based on the different prices and terms used with other market participants, could have resulted in a liability ranging from £543m to £837m. The key assumptions in calculating the financial liability are in estimating what is a market wholesale price at market volume commitment that is supported by the forecast volumes for the related revenue streams. The volumes used are consistent with those included in the jointly-agreed business plan for the Sports JV. We note that the bottom of the range disclosed above is based on the price that we will pay when the minimum revenue guarantee has ended, however we do not believe that is an appropriate rate from the outset due to existing volume commitments. The liability is held at amortised cost within trade and other payables on the balance sheet (see note 17) – the carrying amount at 31 March 2024 has reduced to £465m (FY23: £660m) after payments made to the Sports JV on the minimum revenue guarantee.
WBD has the option to acquire BT plc’s 50% interest in the Sports JV at specified points during the first four years of the Sports JV. If the Call Option is not exercised, BT plc will have the ability to exit its shareholding in the JV either through a sale or IPO. The group valued its interest in the Sports JV based on the estimated fair value at exit and using the following key assumptions:
– BT expect to realise its interest in the Sports JV through exit rather than ongoing value in use.
– BT expect WBD to exercise its option to acquire BT’s 50% interest in the Sports JV at the end of the first four years of the Sports JV.
– An earnings multiple has been applied to the expected year 5 EBITDA per the jointly-agreed business plan - the multiple is at the lower end of a possible range identified from comparable peers and transactions in the premium sports subscription and broadcasting market.
The investment is subsequently accounted for using the equity method and will be subject to impairment testing at each reporting period, with any impairment losses recognised through specific items, see note 24.
All cash flows expected to be received or paid over time were discounted at a rate applicable to the risks associated with the cash flows:
– Deferred payments due to BT from WBD have been discounted at an appropriate post-tax cost of debt;
– BT’s earn-out from the Sports JV has been discounted at the weighted average cost of capital for the Sports JV at completion date; and
– BT’s commitments under the minimum guarantee have been discounted at the group’s post-tax cost of debt.
We do not consider the net present value of the transaction would be materially affected by a reasonable change in the discount rate.
At 31 March 2024 there are no assets and liabilities classified as held for sale. Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale at 31 March 2023 related to certain city fibre networks and associated infrastructure assets in Germany and Pelipod Limited. These divestments completed during FY24, and information on the gains and losses on disposal is disclosed above.
The disposal groups held for sale comprised the following assets and liabilities:
| At 31 March | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Assets | ||
| Intangible assets | — | 13 |
| Property, plant and equipment | — | 4 |
| Right-of-use assets | — | 3 |
| Inventories | — | — |
| Trade and other receivables | — | 1 |
| Assets held for sale | — | 21 |
| Liabilities | ||
| Trade and other payables | — | 1 |
| Lease liabilities | — | 3 |
| Liabilities held for sale | — | 4 |
a Intangible assets in FY23 include goodwill of £13m that has been allocated to the disposal group.
These investments are measured at amortised cost. The carrying amount of these balances approximates to fair value. Any gain or loss on derecognition is recognised in the income statement.
These investments are initially recognised at fair value plus direct transaction costs. They are re-measured at subsequent reporting dates to fair value and changes are recognised directly in the income statement.
We have made an irrevocable election to present changes in the fair value of equity investments that are not held for trading in other comprehensive income. All gains or losses, aside from dividends, are recognised in other comprehensive income and are not reclassified to the income statement when the investments are disposed of, instead any balance remaining in other comprehensive income is transferred to retained earnings. Dividends are recognised in the income statement when our right to receive payment is established. Equity investments are recorded in non-current assets unless they are expected to be sold within one year.
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | ||
| Fair value through other comprehensive income | 23 | 23 |
| Fair value through profit or loss | 6 | 6 |
| Total non-current asset investments | 29 | 29 |
| Current assets | ||
| Investments held at amortised cost | 2,366 | 3,548 |
| Current asset investments | 2,366 | 3,548 |
Investments held at amortised cost relate to money market investments denominated in sterling of £2,355m (FY23: £3,094m), in euros of £5m (FY23: £446m) and US dollars of £6m (FY23: £8m). Within these amounts are investments in liquidity funds of £1,815m (FY23: £3,491m), collateral paid on swaps of £40m (FY23: £48m), interest on investments of £11m (FY23: £9m) and gilt repurchase agreements £500m (FY23: £nil) .
| Continued Fair value estimation | Total held at Fair value | Fair value hierarchy | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2024 | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Non-current and current investments | |||||
| Fair value through other comprehensive income | — | — | 23 | 23 | |
| Fair value through profit or loss | 6 | — | — | — | 6 |
| Total | 6 | — | 23 | 29 | |
| At 31 March 2023 | |||||
| Non-current and current investments | |||||
| Fair value through other comprehensive income | — | — | 23 | 23 | |
| Fair value through profit or loss | 6 | — | — | — | 6 |
| Total | 6 | — | 23 | 29 |
The three levels of valuation methodology used are: Level 1 – uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 – uses inputs for the asset or liability other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 3 – uses inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data, such as internal models or other valuation methods. Level 3 balances consist of investments classified as fair value through other comprehensive income of £23m (FY23: £23m) which represent investments in a number of private companies. If specific market data is not available, these investments are held at cost, adjusted as necessary for impairments, which approximates to fair value.
| At 31 March | 2024 | 2023 |
| £m | £m | |
| Interest in joint ventures | 302 | 354 |
| Interest in associates | 5 | 5 |
| Total | 307 | 359 |
Share of post tax loss of associates and joint ventures included in the income statement of £21m (FY23: £59m loss) includes £41m loss (FY23: £60m) relating to our sports joint venture (Sports JV) with Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) and £20m profit (FY23: £1m) relating to our other joint ventures and associates including Rugby Radio Station. The Sports JV is the only material equity-accounted investment held by the group, see below for further details.
In FY23 we formed the Sports JV (known externally as TNT Sports) with WBD, combining BT Sport and WBD’s Eurosport UK business. Further details on the transaction are provided in note 22.
Key developments in the Sports JV during the year:
The group holds both ordinary equity shares and preference shares in the Sports JV entity.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
202
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
The Sports JV is classified as a joint venture based on an assessment under IFRS 10 and 11 of the ownership, voting power and joint control established through the joint venture agreement between BT and WBD. Factors relevant to our assessment:
The assessment whether joint control remains in place is reviewed at each reporting period.
The Sports JV has a financial year-end of 31 July and has not yet prepared its first set of audited financial statements. In order to recognise our share of the Sports JV’s results for our equity-accounted investment, we have prepared the Sports JV’s financial information disclosed below based on management accounts for the period ending 31 March 2024 after making certain adjustments to comply with IFRS.
Significant judgements made in preparing the Sports JV’s financial information:
Accounting policies in other areas are consistent with those applied by the group.
We expect the group’s A preference shares to be redeemed by the Sports JV for the distribution of cash to BT under our earn-out entitlement. BT’s return on the shares is driven by the underlying cash profit generation of the Sports JV and therefore have been classified as a fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) financial asset under IFRS 9 and is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date. The fair value recorded is supported by a jointly-agreed business plan and internal valuation model with the following key assumptions:
Our retained ordinary equity interest in the Sports JV is held under the equity method of accounting, consistent with our accounting policy on associates and joint ventures.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
| £m | £m | |
| Carrying amount at 1 April | 352 | 414 |
| Share of total comprehensive loss for the year | (52) | (62) |
| Dividends received during the year | — | — |
| Carrying amount at 31 March | 300 | 352 |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
203
Financial statements
As required by IAS 36, we have assessed the investment for impairment. There is no impairment at 31 March 2024 as the fair value less costs to sell is higher than the carrying amount of the investment. See below for sensitivities we have applied in determining the fair value less costs to sell.
The following is summarised and unaudited financial information for the Sports JV prepared in accordance with IFRS and including adjustments required to align with the group’s accounting policies and fair value adjustments.
| Summarised statement of total comprehensive income for year ended 31 March | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | |
| £m | £m | |
| Revenue | 918 | 557 |
| Loss for the year | (82) | (121) |
| Other comprehensive loss | (22) | (2) |
| Total comprehensive loss | (104) | (123) |
| Summarised balance sheet at 31 March | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | |
| £m | £m | |
| Current assets | 863 | 1,098 |
| Non-current assets | 1,085 | 1,286 |
| Current liabilities | (413) | (702) |
| Non-current liabilities | (575) | (618) |
| Net assets | 960 | 1,064 |
| Attributable to fair value of BT’s A preference shares (see below) | (387) | (429) |
| BT’s share of residual net assets (50%) | 287 | 318 |
| Other fair value adjustments | 13 | 34 |
| Carrying amount of interest in Sports JV | 300 | 352 |
a Includes amortisation of £27m (FY23: £56m) on acquired intangibles; net finance income of £5m (FY23: £6m); and tax income of £57m (FY23: £17m) driven by current tax charge of £10m (FY23: £4m) offset by deferred tax credit of £67m (FY23: £21m).
b Restated to reflect true-up to opening balance sheet from finalising fair value adjustments.
c Includes cash and cash and cash equivalents of £11m (FY23: £11m).
d Includes goodwill and acquired intangibles of £668m (FY23: £695m restated).
e Includes current financial liabilities (excluding trade and other payables and provisions) of £(244)m (FY23: £(281)m) of which £(163)m (FY23: £(268)m) relates to the outstanding liability on the RCF provided by BT (see note 30).
f Includes non-current financial liabilities (excluding trade and other payables and provisions) of £(305)m (FY23: £(416)m).## 24. Joint ventures and associates
The Sports JV had a loss after tax for the year of £82m, after adjustments made to align with the group’s accounting policies, and reflects amortisation of acquired intangibles from the BT Sport and Eurosport UK business transfers and adjustments for the off-market minimum guarantee with BT (see note 22). Underlying trading before these adjustments was profitable. In addition, the Sports JV had other comprehensive losses of £22m relating to fair value movements on its foreign exchange hedging arrangement with the group (see note 30) that have been designated as cash flow hedges. Our share of the Sports JV’s results in FY23 included amortisation from provisional fair value adjustments, which were subject to true-up within 12 months from the Sports JV formation. We have subsequently finalised these fair value adjustments and recorded a £25m credit in the current year as a true-up to the amount recorded in FY23, of which our 50% share is £13m. The difference is not material and therefore we have not retrospectively adjusted our share of total comprehensive loss in FY23.
In addition to BT’s ordinary shareholding, BT held the following investments in preference shares in the Sports JV that have not been included within the equity-accounted interest above.
| At 31 March | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Investment in A preference shares | 387 | 429 |
| Investment in C preference shares | 146 | 126 |
| Total | 533 | 555 |
A net £22m movement has been recorded on the group’s preference share investments relating to fair value changes only, see below for further details.
The preference shares are held at Level 3 on the fair value hierarchy, reflecting a valuation methodology that does not use inputs based on observable market data – see note 23 for further details on the fair value hierarchy. See below for sensitivities we have applied in determining the fair value.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 204
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
The group’s ordinary equity and preference share investments in the Sports JV, carry both upside and downside risk from changes in micro and macroeconomic factors affecting the sports content subscription market and risk appetite of investors in that market. Further, a key decision point in the next 12 months, relating to the renewal of a material customer contract, could significantly impact the value of our investments. We have applied the following sensitivities to these risk factors:
| Headroom on impairment test | Fair value of A and C preference over equity-accounted shares in Sports JV investment |
|---|---|
| 20% increase or decrease in EBITDA | +/- £112m |
| 10% increase or decrease in discount rate | +/- £4m |
| 10% change in valuation multiple | — |
None of these sensitivities generated an impairment on the group’s equity-accounted investment in the Sports JV. In valuing our investments, we have assumed an exit after the earn-out period ends on the fourth anniversary of forming the Sports JV. However, an earlier exit would not have a material impact on the amounts recorded.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand and current balances with banks and similar institutions, which are readily convertible to cash, are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value and have an original maturity of three months or less. All are held at amortised cost on the balance sheet, equating to fair value. For the purpose of the consolidated cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents are as defined above net of outstanding bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are included within the current element of loans and other borrowings (note 26).
| At 31 March | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand | 332 | 336 |
| Cash equivalents | ||
| Indian rupee deposits | 74 | 55 |
| Other deposits | 8 | 1 |
| Total cash equivalents | 82 | 56 |
| Total cash and cash equivalents | 414 | 392 |
| Bank overdrafts (note 26) | (58) | (11) |
| Cash and cash equivalents per the cash flow statement | 356 | 381 |
The majority of cash at bank balance was held at counterparties with a credit rating of A2/A or above. Cash and cash equivalents include restricted cash of £71m (FY23: £131m), of which £14m (FY23: £23m) was held in countries where local capital or exchange controls currently prevent us from accessing cash balances. The remaining balance of £57m (FY23: £108m) was held in escrow accounts, or in commercial arrangements akin to escrow.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 205
Financial statements
We initially recognise loans and other borrowings at the fair value of amounts received net of transaction costs. They are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method and, if included in a fair value hedge relationship, are re-valued to reflect the fair value movements on the associated hedged risk. The resulting amortisation of fair value movements, on de-designation of the hedge, is recognised in the income statement.
Our capital management policy targets an overall level of debt consistent with our credit rating target of BBB+/Baa1 and minimum rating of BBB/Baa2 while investing in the business, supporting the pension scheme and meeting our distribution policy. To meet this objective, we may issue or repay debt, issue or repurchase shares or adjust dividends paid to shareholders. We manage the capital structure and make adjustments to it accordingly to reflect changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the group. The Board regularly reviews the capital structure and capital management policy and no changes were made in FY24. For details of share issues and repurchases in the year see note 20. Our capital structure consists of net debt and shareholders’ equity. The analysis below summarises the components which we manage as capital.
| At 31 March | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|
| Net debt | 19,479 | 18,859 |
| Total parent shareholders’ equity | 12,513 | 14,490 |
| Capital structure | 31,992 | 33,349 |
a Excludes non-controlling interests of £5m (FY23: £24m).
Net debt consists of loans and other borrowings, lease liabilities (both current and non-current) less current asset investments and cash and cash equivalents, including items which have been classified as held for sale on the balance sheet. Amounts due to joint ventures and loans and borrowings recognised in relation to monies received from the sale of cash flows of contract assets and as prepayment for the forward sale of redundant copper are excluded. Currency-denominated balances within net debt are translated to sterling at swap rates where hedged. Fair value adjustments and accrued interest applied to reflect the effective interest method are removed. We explain the rationale for using net debt as a key performance indicator, together with changes to the metric in FY24, in Additional Information on page 231.
Net financial debt is defined as net debt excluding lease liabilities. Net debt and net financial debt are considered to be alternative performance measures as they are not defined in IFRS. The most directly comparable IFRS measure is the aggregate of loans and other borrowings and lease liabilities (current and non-current), current asset investments and cash and cash equivalents. A reconciliation from these IFRS measures to net debt and net financial debt is given below.
| At 31 March | Notes | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and other borrowings | 18,526 | 18,521 | |
| Lease liabilities | 15 | 4,955 | 5,359 |
| Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale | — | 3 | |
| Less: Cash and cash equivalents | 25 | (414) | (392) |
| Current asset investments | 23 | (2,366) | (3,548) |
| 20,701 | 19,943 | ||
| Adjustments: | |||
| To retranslate debt balances at swap rates where hedged by currency swaps | (512) | (819) | |
| To remove accrued interest applied to reflect the effective interest method and fair value adjustments | (275) | (254) | |
| Loans with joint ventures | 30 | (11) | (11) |
| Loans related to the forward sale of redundant copper | (106) | — | |
| Loans related to sale of contract assets | (318) | — | |
| Net debt | 19,479 | 18,859 | |
| Lease liabilities | 15 | (4,955) | (5,359) |
| Lease liabilities classified as held for sale | — | (3) | |
| Net financial debt | 14,524 | 13,497 |
a Includes overdrafts of £58m at 31 March 2024 (FY23: £11m).
b Refer to note 22.
c The translation difference between spot rate and hedged rate of loans and borrowings denominated in foreign currency.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 206
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
The table below shows the key components of net debt and the increase of £620m this year.
| At 31 March 2023 £m | Cash flows £m | Net lease additions £m | Foreign exchange £m | Transfer to within one year £m | Other movements £m | At 31 March 2024 £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and other borrowings due within one year | 1,772 | (1,615) | — | (12) | 1,227 | 23 |
| Loans and other borrowings due after one year | 16,749 | 1,800 | — | (287) | (1,227) | 96 |
| Total loans and other borrowings | 18,521 | 185 | — | (299) | — | 119 |
| Lease liabilities due within one year | 800 | (882) | — | (1) | 849 | — |
| Lease liabilities due after one year | 4,559 | — | 487 | (8) | (849) | — |
| Liabilities classified as held for sale | 3 | — | — | — | — | (3) |
| Total lease liabilities | 5,362 | (882) | 487 | (9) | — | (3) |
| Gross debt | 23,883 | (697) | 487 | (308) | — | 116 |
| Less: Impact of cross-currency swaps | (819) | — | — | 307 | — | — |
| Removal of the accrued interest and fair value adjustments | (264) | — | — | — | — | (22) |
| Removal of loans with joint ventures | (11) | (1) | — | — | — | 1 |
| Removal of loans related to the forward sale of redundant copper | — | (105) | — | — | — | (1) |
| Removal of loans related to sale of cash flows related to contract assets | — | (305) | — | — | — | (13) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (392) | (30) | — | 8 | — | — |
| Current asset investments | (3,548) | 1,173 | — | 10 | — | (1) |
| Removal of accrued interest | 10 | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Net debt | 18,859 | 35 | 487 | 17 | — | 81 |
| At 31 March 2022 £m | Cash flows £m | Net lease additions £m | Foreign exchange £m | Transfer to within one year £m | Other movements £m | At 31 March 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and other borrowings due within one year | 873 | (136) | — | 65 | 943 | 27 |
| Loans and other borrowings due after one year | 15,312 | 1,746 | — | 525 | (943) | 109 |
| Total loans and other borrowings | 16,185 | 1,610 | — | 590 | — | 136 |
| Lease liabilities due within one year | 795 | (860) | — | 2 | 863 | — |
| Lease liabilities due after one year | 4,965 | — | 449 | 11 | (863) | (3) |
| Liabilities classified as held for sale | 2 | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Total lease liabilities | 5,762 | (860) | 449 | 13 | — | (2) |
| Gross debt | 21,947 | 750 | 449 | 603 | — | 134 |
| Less: Impact of cross-currency swaps | (234) | — | — | (585) | — | — |
| Removal of the accrued interest and fair value adjustments | (251) | — | — | — | — | (13) |
| Removal of loans with joint ventures | — | (11) | — | — | — | — |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (777) | 379 | — | 3 | — | 3 |
| Current asset investments | (2,679) | (885) | — | (21) | — | 37 |
| Removal of accrued interest | 3 | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| Net debt | 18,009 | 233 | 449 | — | — | 168 |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 207
Financial statements
The table below shows how cash flows from gross debt of £(697)m (FY23: £750m) in the table above reconciles to the line items presented in the group cash flow statement on page 149:
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Repayment of borrowings | (1,676) | (513) |
| Proceeds from bank loans and bonds | 2,242 | 2,203 |
| Cash flows from collateral (paid) received | (532) | (17) |
| Increase (decrease) in amounts owned to joint ventures | (1) | 11 |
| Change in bank overdraft | 47 | (74) |
| Total loans and other borrowings cash flows - financing activities | 80 | 1,610 |
| Prepayment for the forward sale of copper | 105 | — |
| Total loans and other borrowings cash flows - investing activities | 105 | — |
| Total loans and other borrowings cash flows | 185 | 1,610 |
| Payment of lease liabilities | (748) | (727) |
| Interest on lease liabilities paid | (134) | (133) |
| Total lease liability cash flows - financing activities | (882) | (860) |
| Total gross debt cash flows | (697) | 750 |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 208
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
The table below gives details of the listed bonds and other debt.
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.875% €306m bond due September 2023 a | — | 270 |
| 4.5% $675m bond due December 2023 | — | 554 |
| 1% €469m bond due June 2024 | — | 415 |
| 1% €825m bond due November 2024 | 708 | 726 |
| 3.50% £250m index linked bond due April 2025 | 575 | 524 |
| 0.5% €650m bond due September 2025 | 557 | 571 |
| 1.75% €1,300m bond due March 2026 | 1,112 | 1,143 |
| 1.5% €1,150m bond due June 2027 | 991 | 1,017 |
| 2.75% €700m bond due August 2027 | 601 | 530 |
| 2.125% €500m bond due September 2028 a | 431 | 442 |
| 5.125% $700m bond due December 2028 | 561 | 573 |
| 5.75% £600m bond due December 2028 | 658 | 669 |
| 1.125% €750m bond due September 2029 a | 640 | 657 |
| 3.25% $1,000m bond due November 2029 | 796 | 812 |
| 9.625% $2,670m bond due December 2030 a (minimum 8.625% b ) | 2,166 | 2,214 |
| 3.75% €800m bond due February 2031 | 704 | 704 |
| 3.125% £500m bond due November 2031 | 503 | 503 |
| 3.375% €500m bond due August 2032 | 433 | 445 |
| 4.25% €850m bond due January 2033 | 725 | — |
| 3.64% £330m bond due June 2033 | 339 | 339 |
| 1.613% £330m index linked bond due June 2033 | 394 | 380 |
| 6.375% £500m bond due June 2037 | 523 | 523 |
| 3.883% £330m bond due June 2039 | 340 | 340 |
| 1.739% £330m index linked bond due June 2039 | 394 | 381 |
| 5.75% £450m bond due February 2041 | 445 | 347 |
| 3.924% £340m bond due June 2042 | 350 | 350 |
| 1.774% £340m index linked bond due June 2042 | 406 | 392 |
| 2.08% JPY10,000m bond due February 2043 | 52 | 61 |
| 3.625% £250m bond due November 2047 | 251 | 250 |
| 4.25% $500m bond due November 2049 | 400 | 408 |
| 1.874% €500m hybrid bond due August 2080 | 432 | 443 |
| 4.250% $500m hybrid bond due November 2081 | 396 | 404 |
| 4.875% $500m hybrid bond due November 2081 | 401 | 409 |
| 8.375% £700m hybrid bond due December 2083 | 710 | — |
| Total listed bonds | 17,994 | 17,796 |
| Loans related to the sale of cash flows related to contract assets | 341 | 100 |
| Loans related to the forward sale of redundant copper | 106 | — |
| Other loans | 27 | 614 |
| Bank overdrafts (note 25) | 58 | 11 |
| Total other loans and borrowings | 532 | 725 |
| Total loans and other borrowings | 18,526 | 18,521 |
Unless previously designated in a fair value hedge relationship, all loans and other borrowings are carried on our balance sheet and in the table above at amortised cost. The fair value of listed bonds is £17,820m (FY23: £16,979m). The fair value of our listed bonds is estimated on the basis of quoted market prices (Level 1). The carrying amount of other loans and bank overdrafts equates to fair value due to the short maturity of these items (Level 3). The interest rates payable on loans and borrowings disclosed above reflect the coupons on the underlying issued loans and borrowings and not the interest rates achieved through applying associated cross-currency and interest rate swaps in hedge arrangements.
During the period the group entered into a forward agreement to sell copper granules created from BT’s surplus copper cables. The right to receive cash is dependent on the initial buyer receiving payment from the end customer and so a financial liability of £106m including accrued interest has been recognised. This should be the only cash flow that occurs as part of this transaction and so the cash receipt of £105m has been included in a separate line within investing activities in the cash flow statement.
Loans and other borrowings are analysed as follows:
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Current liabilities | ||
| Listed bonds | 996 | 1,075 |
| Amounts owed to joint ventures | 11 | 11 |
| Other loans and bank overdrafts | 388 | 686 |
| Total current liabilities | 1,395 | 1,772 |
| Non-current liabilities | ||
| Listed bonds | 16,998 | 16,722 |
| Other loans and bank overdrafts | 133 | 27 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 17,131 | 16,749 |
| Total loans and other borrowings | 18,526 | 18,521 |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 209
Financial statements
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of Principal | Effect of Principal | Carrying | Effect of Principal | Effect of Principal | Carrying | |
| hedging and interest | repayments at hedged rates | amount | hedging and interest | repayments at hedged rates | amount | |
| At 31 March | ||||||
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Within one year, or on demand | (258) | 1,137 | (271) | 1,501 | 1,772 | |
| Between one and two years | (85) | 2,642 | 15 | 1,180 | 1,165 | |
| Between two and three years | (24) | 407 | (141) | 2,528 | 2,669 | |
| Between three and four years | 29 | 1,643 | (33) | 371 | 404 | |
| Between four and five years | 6 | 2,288 | (14) | 1,525 | 1,539 | |
| After five years | (496) | 9,611 | (646) | 10,337 | 10,983 | |
| Total due for repayment after more than one year | (570) | 16,591 | (819) | 15,941 | 16,760 | |
| Total repayments | (828) | 17,728 | (1,090) | 17,442 | 18,532 | |
| Non cash adjustments | (30) | (11) | ||||
| Total loans and other borrowings | 18,526 | 18,521 |
a Fair value adjustments and unamortised bond fees.
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | £m | £m |
| Finance expense | ||
| Interest on: | ||
| Financial liabilities at amortised cost and associated derivatives | 872 | 753 |
| Lease liabilities | 134 | 133 |
| Derivatives | 4 | 9 |
| Fair value movements on derivatives not in a designated hedge relationship | (1) | 1 |
| Reclassification of cash flow hedge from other comprehensive income | 38 | (21) |
| Unwinding of discount on provisions and other payables | 20 | 14 |
| Total finance expense before specific items | 1,067 | 889 |
| Specific items (note 9) | 121 | 5 |
| Total finance expense | 1,188 | 894 |
a Includes £nil (FY23: £13m credit) reclassification of cash flow hedge from other comprehensive income.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
210
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | £m | £m |
| Finance income | ||
| Interest on: | ||
| Bank deposits and cash equivalents | 28 | 16 |
| Investments held at amortised cost | 140 | 40 |
| Other finance income | 13 | 7 |
| Total finance income | 181 | 63 |
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March | £m | £m |
| Net finance expense before specific items | 886 | 826 |
| Specific items (note 9) | 121 | 5 |
| Net finance expense | 1,007 | 831 |
We issue or hold financial instruments mainly to finance our operations; to finance corporate transactions such as share buybacks and acquisitions; for the temporary investment of short-term funds; and to manage currency and interest rate risks. In addition, various financial instruments, for example trade receivables and payables arise directly from operations.
Our activities expose us to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.
We have a centralised treasury operation whose primary role is to manage liquidity and funding requirements as well as our exposure to associated market risks, and credit risk.
Treasury policy is set by the Board. Group treasury activities are subject to a set of controls appropriate for the magnitude of borrowing, investments and group-wide exposures. The Board has delegated authority to operate these policies to a series of panels responsible for the management of key treasury risks and operations. Appointment to and removal from the key panels requires approval from two of the following: the Chairman, the Chief Executive or the Chief Financial Officer. There has been no change in the nature of our risk profile between 31 March 2024 and the date of approval of these financial statements.
Interest rate risk arises primarily from our long-term borrowings. Interest cash flow risk arises from borrowings issued at variable rates, partially offset by cash held at variable rates. Fair value interest rate risk arises from borrowings issued at fixed rates. Our policy, as set by the Board, is to ensure that at least 70% of ongoing net debt is at fixed rates. Short-term interest rate management is delegated to the treasury operation while long-term interest rate management decisions require further approval by the Chief Financial Officer, the Corporate Finance Director or the Group Treasury Director who each have been delegated such authority from the Board.
In order to manage our interest rate profile, we enter into cross-currency and interest rate swap agreements to vary the amounts and periods for which interest rates on borrowings are fixed. The duration of the swap agreements matches the duration of the debt instruments. The majority of the group’s long-term borrowings are subject to fixed sterling interest rates after applying the impact of these hedging instruments.
Foreign currency hedging activities protect the group from the risk that changes in exchange rates will adversely affect future net cash flows. The Board’s policy for foreign exchange risk management defines the types of transactions typically covered, including significant operational, funding and currency interest exposures, and the period over which cover should extend for each type of transaction. The Board has delegated short-term foreign exchange management to the treasury operation and long-term foreign exchange management decisions require further approval from the Chief Financial Officer, the Corporate Finance Director or the Group Treasury Director.
A significant proportion of our external revenue and costs arise within the UK and are denominated in sterling. Our non-UK operations generally trade and are funded in their functional currency which limits their exposure to foreign exchange volatility. We do not have a material exposure to hyperinflationary economies. We enter into forward currency contracts to hedge foreign currency capital purchases, purchase and sale commitments, interest expense and foreign currency investments. The commitments hedged are principally denominated in US dollars, euros, Indian rupees and BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
211
Financial statements
27. Finance expense and income continued Hungarian forints. As a result, our exposure to foreign currency arises mainly on non-UK subsidiary investments and on residual currency trading flows. We use cross-currency swaps to swap foreign currency borrowings into sterling. The table below reflects the currency and interest rate profile of our loans and borrowings after the impact of hedging.
| 2024 | 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed rate interest | Floating rate interest | Total | Fixed rate interest | |
| At 31 March | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Sterling | 15,899 | 1,780 | 17,679 | 15,210 |
| Euro | — | — | — | — |
| Other | — | 49 | 49 | — |
| Total | 15,899 | 1,829 | 17,728 | 15,210 |
| Ratio of fixed to floating | 90% | 10% | 100% | 87% |
| Weighted average effective fixed interest rate – sterling | 4.6% | 4.0% |
The floating rate loans and borrowings and committed facilities bear interest rates fixed in advance for periods up to one year, primarily by reference to RPI, CPI and ARRs where applicable.
The income statement and shareholders’ equity are exposed to volatility arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and energy prices. To demonstrate this volatility, management has concluded that the following are reasonable benchmarks for performing sensitivity analysis:
– For interest, a 1% increase in interest rates and parallel shift in yield curves across sterling, US dollar and euro currencies.
– For foreign exchange, a 10% strengthening of sterling against other currencies.
– For energy, a 10% increase in energy prices.
The impact on equity, before tax and excluding any impact related to retirement benefit plans, of a 1% increase in interest rates, a 10% strengthening of sterling against other currencies, and a 10% increase in energy prices is as detailed below:
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | £m | £m |
| Increase (reduce) | Increase (reduce) | |
| Sterling interest rates | 602 | 579 |
| US dollar interest rates | (300) | (371) |
| Euro interest rates | (316) | (284) |
| Sterling strengthening | (142) | (169) |
| Energy prices | 27 | 45 |
A 1% decrease in interest rates, 10% weakening of sterling against other currencies would have broadly the same impact in the opposite direction. The impact of a 1% change in interest rates on the group’s annual net finance expense, 10% change in energy prices on group’s income statement and our exposure to foreign exchange volatility in the income statement, after hedging (excluding translation exposures), would not have been material in FY24 and FY23.
We continue to target a BBB+/Baa1 credit rating over the cycle, with a BBB/Baa2 floor. We regularly review the liquidity of the group and our funding strategy takes account of medium-term requirements. These include the pension deficit and shareholder distributions. Our December 2030 bond contains terms that require us to pay higher rates of interest when our credit ratings are below A3 in the case of Moody’s or A– in the case of Standard & Poor’s (S&P). Additional interest of 0.25% per year accrues for each ratings category downgrade by each agency below those levels effective from the next coupon date following a downgrade. Based on the total notional value of debt outstanding of £2.1bn at 31 March 2024, our finance expense would increase/decrease by approximately £11m a year if the group’s credit rating were to be downgraded/upgraded, respectively, by one credit rating category by both agencies.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
How do we manage liquidity risk?
Management policy
We maintain liquidity by entering into short and long-term financial instruments to support operational and other funding requirements, determined by using short- and long-term cash forecasts. These forecasts are supplemented by a financial headroom analysis which is used to assess funding adequacy for at least a 12-month period. On at least an annual basis the Board reviews and approves the long- term funding requirements of the group and on an ongoing basis considers any related matters. We manage refinancing risk by limiting the amount of borrowing that matures within any specified period and having appropriate strategies in place to manage refinancing needs as they arise. The maturity profile of our loans and borrowings at 31 March 2024 is disclosed in note 26. We have term debt maturities of £0.7bn in FY25. Our treasury operation reviews and manages our short-term requirements within the parameters of the policies set by the Board. We hold cash, cash equivalents and current investments in order to manage short-term liquidity requirements. At 31 March 2024 we had undrawn committed borrowing facilities of £2.1bn (FY23: £2.1bn) maturing in March 2027.
The following table provides an analysis of the remaining cash flows including interest payable for our non-derivative financial liabilities on an undiscounted basis, which may therefore differ from both the carrying value and fair value.
| Non-derivative financial liabilities | Trade and other payables | Loans and borrowings | Interest on loans and other borrowings | Lease liabilities | Provisions | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2024 | ||||||
| Due within one year | £m 1,103 | £m 738 | £m 5,438 | £m 765 | £m — | £m 8,044 |
| Between one and two years | 2,727 | 737 | 189 | 730 | — | 4,383 |
| Between two and three years | 431 | 697 | 88 | 696 | — | 1,912 |
| Between three and four years | 1,614 | 680 | — | 663 | — | 2,957 |
| Between four and five years | 2,282 | 649 | — | 634 | — | 3,565 |
| After five years | 10,107 | 2,569 | — | 2,103 | — | 14,779 |
| 18,264 | 6,070 | 5,715 | 5,591 | — | 35,640 | |
| Interest payments not yet accrued | — | (5,778) | — | — | — | (5,778) |
| Fair value adjustment | (30) | — | — | — | — | (30) |
| Impact of discounting a,b | — | — | (16) | (636) | — | (652) |
| Carrying value on the balance sheet | 18,234 | 292 | 5,699 | 4,955 | — | 29,180 |
| At 31 March 2023 (restated) | ||||||
| Due within one year | £m 1,512 | £m 643 | £m 5,467 | £m 800 | £m 3 | £m 8,425 |
| Between one and two years | 1,165 | 637 | 204 | 774 | 2 | 2,782 |
| Between two and three years | 2,669 | 616 | 189 | 676 | 2 | 4,152 |
| Between three and four years | 404 | 575 | 88 | 640 | 2 | 1,709 |
| Between four and five years | 1,539 | 558 | — | 612 | 2 | 2,711 |
| After five years | 10,983 | 2,891 | — | 2,529 | — | 16,403 |
| 18,272 | 5,920 | 5,948 | 6,031 | 11 | 36,182 | |
| Interest payments not yet accrued | — | (5,660) | — | — | — | (5,660) |
| Fair value adjustment | (11) | — | — | — | — | (11) |
| Impact of discounting a,b,c | — | — | (32) | (672) | (1) | (705) |
| Carrying value on the balance sheet | 18,261 | 260 | 5,916 | 5,359 | 10 | 29,806 |
a Foreign currency-related cash flows were translated at closing foreign exchange rates as at the relevant reporting date. Future variable interest cash flows were calculated using the most recent interest or indexation rates at the relevant balance sheet date.
b The carrying amount of trade and other payables excludes £366m (FY23: £455m) of non-current trade and other payables which relates to non-financial liabilities, and £899m (FY23: £1,113m) of other taxation, social security and deferred income.
c FY23 comparatives have been restated to include the financial liability for the minimum guarantee provided to the Sports JV due in more than one year, totalling £465m.These amounts had been omitted from this table within the prior year accounts.
d No provisions meeting the definition of a financial liability have been identified in FY24. Trade and other payables are held at amortised cost. The carrying amount of these balances approximates to fair value due to the short maturity of amounts payable.
The following table provides an analysis of the contractually agreed cash flows in respect of the group’s derivative financial instruments. Cash flows are presented on a net or gross basis in accordance with settlement arrangements of the instruments.
| Gross settled outflows | Gross settled inflows | Net settled | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2024 | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Due within one year | 17 | 2,274 | (2,135) | 156 |
| Between one and two years | 16 | 1,152 | (1,028) | 140 |
| Between two and three years | 16 | 519 | (430) | 105 |
| Between three and four years | 17 | 1,935 | (1,857) | 95 |
| Between four and five years | 17 | 597 | (528) | 86 |
| After five years | 12 | 3,071 | (2,866) | 217 |
| Total a,b | 95 | 9,548 | (8,844) | 799 |
| At 31 March 2023 | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Due within one year | 47 | 2,184 | (2,088) | 143 |
| Between one and two years | 47 | 1,125 | (1,058) | 114 |
| Between two and three years | 94 | 939 | (882) | 151 |
| Between three and four years | 111 | 381 | (364) | 128 |
| Between four and five years | 16 | 161 | (135) | 42 |
| After five years | 47 | 2,127 | (2,011) | 163 |
| Total a,b | 362 | 6,917 | (6,538) | 741 |
a Analysed by earliest payment date, certain derivative financial instruments contain break clauses whereby either the group or bank counterparty have the right to terminate the swap on certain dates. If the break clause was exercised, the mark to market position would be settled in cash.
b Foreign currency-related cash flows were translated at closing foreign exchange rates as at the relevant reporting date. Future variable interest rate cash flows were calculated using the most recent rate applied at the relevant balance sheet date.
How do we manage energy price risk?
Management policy
UK (excluding Northern Ireland) and European energy prices continue to be exposed to volatility driven by fears of reduced gas supply as Europe continues the shift from Russian gas to LNG and renewables (which themselves are subject to short-term fluctuations given their intermittent nature). In order to manage our exposure to fluctuating energy prices, we have a target for UK (excluding Northern Ireland) energy demand to be at least 80% hedged one quarter before the start of the next financial year, and 50% hedged for the following financial year. We achieve this through forward over the counter hedges and a mixture of new and existing power purchase agreements (PPAs) and derivative virtual PPAs (vPPAs).
Hedging strategy
In each financial year our strategy is to build on our existing PPA and vPPA portfolio, exploring opportunities with 5-10 year contracts delivering favourable net present values. We complement this by monitoring the markets and forward purchasing electricity (power) when the market is favourable. In the forthcoming financial year the aim is to be 95% hedged, which allows for headroom for increased outputs from the renewable sources should weather conditions prevail.
How do we manage credit risk?
Management policy
Our exposure to credit risk arises from financial assets transacted by the treasury operation (primarily derivatives, investments, cash and cash equivalents) and from trading-related receivables. For treasury-related balances, the Board’s defined policy restricts exposure to any one counterparty by setting credit limits based on the credit quality as defined by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. The minimum credit ratings permitted with counterparties in respect of new transactions are A3/A– for long-term and P1/A1 for short-term investments. If counterparties in respect of existing transactions fall below the permitted criteria we will take action where appropriate. The treasury operation continuously reviews the limits applied to counterparties and will adjust the limit according to the nature and credit standing of the counterparty, and in response to market conditions, up to the maximum allowable limit set by the Board.
Operational management policy
Our credit policy for trading-related financial assets is applied and managed by each of the customer-facing units (CFUs) to ensure compliance. The policy requires that the creditworthiness and financial strength of customers are assessed at inception and on an ongoing basis. Payment terms are set in accordance with industry standards. Where appropriate, we may minimise risks by requesting securities such as deposits, guarantees and letters of credit. We take proactive steps including constantly reviewing credit ratings of counterparties to minimise the impact of adverse market conditions on trading-related financial assets.
Exposures
The maximum credit risk exposure of the group’s financial assets at the balance sheet date is as follows:
| At 31 March | Notes | 2024 £m | 2023 £m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Derivative financial assets | 1,070 | 1,479 | |
| Investments | 23 | 2,395 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 16 | 2,224 | 1,821 |
| Contract assets | 5 | 1,740 | 1,934 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 25 | 414 | 392 |
| Total | 7,843 | 9,203 |
a The carrying amount excludes £641m (FY23: £503m) of non-current trade and other receivables which relate to non-financial assets, and £1,341m (FY23: £1,239m) of prepayments, deferred contract costs, finance lease receivables and other assets.
The credit quality and credit concentration of cash equivalents, current asset investments and derivative financial assets are detailed in the tables below. Where the opinion of Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s (S&P) differ, the lower rating is used.# 28. Financial instruments and risk management continued
| £m | £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Aa2/AA and above | 1,823 | 3,498 |
| Aa3/AA– | 585 | 115 |
| A1/A+ | 819 | 957 |
| A2/A | 261 | 400 |
| A3/A– | — | 53 |
| Baa1/BBB+ | — | — |
| Baa2/BBB and below a | 30 | 60 |
| Total b | 3,518 | 5,083 |
a Baa2/BBB rated exposure represents the energy derivatives and carrying value of forward currency contracts with Sports JV.
b We hold cash collateral of £15m (FY23: £557m) in respect of derivative financial assets with certain counterparties, this has reduced during the year as a result of derivative portfolio management. The concentration of credit risk for our trading balances is provided in note 16, which analyses outstanding balances by CFU. Where multiple transactions are undertaken with a single financial counterparty or group of related counterparties, we enter into netting arrangements to reduce our exposure to credit risk by making use of standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) documentation. We have also entered into credit support agreements with certain swap counterparties whereby, on a daily, weekly and monthly basis, the fair value position on notional £1,047m (FY23: £2,024m) of long-dated cross-currency swaps and interest rate swaps is collateralised.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
215
Financial statements
28. Financial instruments and risk management continued
The table below shows our financial assets and liabilities that are subject to offset in the group’s balance sheet and the impact of enforceable master netting or similar agreements.
| Right of set off with derivative counterparties | Cash collateral | Net Financial amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2024 | |||
| Derivative financial assets | £m (356) | £m (15) | £m 699 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | £m 356 | £m 40 | £m (143) |
| Total | £m — | £m 25 | £m 556 |
| At 31 March 2023 | |||
| Derivative financial assets | £m (323) | £m (557) | £m 599 |
| Derivative financial liabilities | £m 323 | £m 48 | £m (12) |
| Total | £m — | £m (509) | £m 587 |
| Amounts presented in the balance sheet | £m 1,070 | £m 531 | |
| £m (539) | £m (143) |
We use derivative financial instruments mainly to reduce exposure to foreign exchange and interest rate risks. Derivatives may qualify as hedges for accounting purposes if they meet the criteria for designation as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges in accordance with IFRS 9.
All of our derivative financial instruments are held at fair value on the balance sheet.
The group designates certain derivatives in a cash flow hedge relationship. Where derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, recognition of any resultant gain or loss depends on the nature of the hedge. To qualify for hedge accounting, hedge documentation must be prepared at inception, the hedge must be in line with BT’s risk management strategy and there must be an economic relationship based on the currency, amount and timing of the respective cash flows of the hedging instrument and hedged item. This is assessed at inception and in subsequent periods in which the hedge remains in operation. Hedge accounting is discontinued when it is no longer in line with BT’s risk management strategy or if it no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. The group targets a one-to-one hedge ratio. The economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument is assessed on an ongoing basis. Ineffectiveness can arise from subsequent change in the forecast transactions as a result of altered timing, cash flows or value. When a derivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge of the variability in cash flows of a recognised asset or liability, or a highly probable transaction, the effective part of any gain or loss on the derivative financial instrument is recognised directly in equity. For cash flow hedges of recognised assets or liabilities, the associated cumulative gain or loss is removed from equity and recognised in the same line of the income statement and in the same period or periods that the hedged transaction affects the income statement. Any ineffectiveness arising on a cash flow hedge is recognised immediately in the income statement.
Our policy is not to use derivatives for trading purposes. However, due to the complex nature of hedge accounting, some derivatives may not qualify for hedge accounting, or may be specifically not designated as a hedge because natural offset is more appropriate. We effectively operate a process to identify any embedded derivatives within revenue, supply, leasing and financing contracts, including those relating to inflationary features. These derivatives are classified as fair value through profit and loss and are recognised at fair value. Any direct transaction costs are recognised immediately in the income statement. Gains and losses on re-measurement are recognised in the income statement in the line that most appropriately reflects the nature of the item or transaction to which they relate. Where the fair value of a derivative contract at initial recognition is not supported by observable market data and differs from the transaction price, a day one gain or loss will arise which is not recognised in the income statement. Such gains and losses are deferred and amortised to the income statement based on the remaining contractual term and as observable market data becomes available. The fair values of outstanding swaps and foreign exchange contracts are estimated using discounted cash flow models and market rates of interest and foreign exchange at the balance sheet date.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
216
Financial statements
Notes to the consolidated financial statements continued
28. Financial instruments and risk management continued
| Current asset £m | Non-current asset £m | Current liability £m | Non-current liability £m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2024 | ||||
| Designated in a cash flow hedge | 34 | 947 | 80 | 383 |
| Other | 16 | 73 | 14 | 62 |
| Total derivatives | 50 | 1,020 | 94 | 445 |
| At 31 March 2023 | ||||
| Designated in a cash flow hedge | 78 | 1,330 | 62 | 255 |
| Other | 4 | 67 | 24 | 42 |
| Total derivatives | 82 | 1,397 | 86 | 297 |
All derivative financial instruments are categorised at Level 2, with the exception of the energy contracts which are categorised at Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as defined in note 23. Instruments designated in a cash flow hedge include interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps hedging euro, US dollar and Japanese yen denominated borrowings. Forward currency contracts are taken out to hedge step up interest on currency denominated borrowings relating to the group’s 2030 US dollar bond. The hedged cash flows will affect the group’s income statement as interest and principal amounts are repaid over the remaining term of the borrowings (see note 26). We hedge forecast foreign currency purchases, principally denominated in US dollars, euros, Indian rupees and Hungarian forints 12 months forward with certain specific transactions hedged further forward. The related cash flows are recognised in the income statement over this period. All hedge relationships were fully effective in the period.
The amounts related to items designated as hedging instruments were as follows:
| Balance sheet carrying value Asset £m | Balance sheet carrying value Liability £m | Fair value recycled from cash flow hedge reserves to OCI £m | Amount recognised in related P&L (gain)/loss £m | Notional principal £m | Hedged items | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 31 March 2024 | ||||||
| Sterling, euro, US dollar and Japanese yen denominated borrowings a | 13,583 | 960 | (355) | (213) | 464 | (361) |
| Step up interest on the 2030 US dollar bond b | 112 | — | (2) | (25) | 2 | 4 |
| Foreign currency purchases, principally denominated in US dollars, euros, Indian rupees and Hungarian forints | 1,308 | 18 | (11) | (12) | 15 | 8 |
| Other, including energy contracts d | 3 | (95) | 90 | 161 | (7) | |
| Total cash flow hedges | 15,003 | 981 | (463) | (160) | 642 | (356) |
| Deferred tax | — | — | 27 | — | ||
| Derivatives not in a designated hedge relationship | 89 | (76) | — | — | ||
| Carrying value on the balance sheet | 1,070 | (539) | ||||
| At 31 March 2023 | ||||||
| Sterling, euro, US dollar and Japanese yen denominated borrowings a | 12,888 | 1,316 | (290) | (316) | (887) | 597 |
| Step up interest on the 2030 US dollar bond b | 115 | — | (2) | (31) | (8) | 6 |
| Foreign currency purchases, principally denominated in US dollars, euros, Indian rupees and Hungarian forints | 1,211 | 34 | (24) | (35) | (75) | 61 |
| Other, including energy contracts d | 58 | (1) | (64) | (85) | 49 | |
| Total cash flow hedges | 14,214 | 1,408 | (317) | (446) | (1,055) | 713 |
| Deferred tax | — | — | 106 | — | ||
| Derivatives not in a designated hedge relationship | 71 | (66) | — | — | ||
| Carrying value on the balance sheet | 1,479 | (383) |
a Sterling, euro, US dollar and Japanese yen denominated borrowings are hedged using cross-currency swaps and interest rate swaps. Amounts recycled to profit and loss are presented within finance expense. Range of hedged rates: sterling interest: 5.9%-6.0% (FY23: 5.9%-6.0%), euro FX: 1.12-1.29 (FY23: 1.11-1.29), US dollar FX: 1.28-1.80 (FY23: 1.28-1.80), Japanese yen FX: 156.92 (FY23: 156.92).
b Step up interest on US dollar denominated borrowings are hedged using forward currency contracts. Amounts recycled to profit and loss are presented within finance expense. Range of hedged FX rates: 1.21-1.28 (FY23: 1.17-1.24).
c Foreign currency purchases, principally denominated in US dollars, euros, Indian rupees and Hungarian forints are hedged using forward currency contracts. Amounts recycled to profit and loss are presented within cost of sales or operating costs, in line with the underlying hedged item. Range of hedged FX rates: US dollar: 1.21-1.30 (FY23: 1.10-1.31), euro: 1.12-1.17 (FY23: 1.11-1.18), Indian rupees: 106.05-120.97 (FY23: 106.05-120.97), Hungarian forint: 458.35-467.81 (FY23: 489.17-503.51).
d Includes £(87)m liability (FY23: £57m asset) relating to energy contracts, these are hedged using contracts for difference and virtual power purchase agreements in order to provide long-term power cost certainty. Amounts recycled to profit and loss are presented within operating costs.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
| Other comprehensive income | Capital b | Cost of redemption | Cash flow | Fair value hedging | Translation a | c d reserve | reserve | reserve | reserve | reserve | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | ||||||
| At 1 April 2022 | 27 | (148) | (1) | 236 | 505 | 619 | |||||
| Reclassification e | — | 472 | — | (472) | — | — | |||||
| Exchange differences | — | — | — | — | 89 | 89 | |||||
| Net fair value gain (loss) on cash flow hedges | — | 864 | — | 191 | — | 1,055 | |||||
| Movements in relation to cash flow hedges g | — | (721) | — | 8 | — | (713) | |||||
| recognised in income and expense | |||||||||||
| Fair value movement on assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | — | — | (3) | — | — | (3) | |||||
| Tax recognised in other comprehensive income | — | (90) | — | — | — | (90) | |||||
| At 31 March 2023 | 27 | 377 | (4) | (37) | 594 | 957 | |||||
| Exchange differences | — | — | — | — | (66) | (66) | |||||
| Net fair value gain (loss) on cash flow hedges | — | (661) | — | 19 | — | (642) | |||||
| Movements in relation to cash flow hedges g | — | 349 | — | 7 | — | 356 | |||||
| recognised in income and expense | |||||||||||
| Tax recognised in other comprehensive income | — | 69 | — | — | 9 | 78 | |||||
| Transfer to realised profit | — | 10 | 12 | — | 11 | 33 | |||||
| At 31 March 2024 | 27 | 144 | 8 | (11) | 548 | 716 |
a The cash flow reserve is used to record the effective portion of the cumulative net change in the fair value of cash flow hedging instruments related to hedged transactions that have not yet occurred. The transfer to realised profit includes a deferred tax adjustment.
b The fair value reserve is used to record gains or losses on equity investments held at fair value through other comprehensive income. When these investments are disposed of any remaining gains or losses in other comprehensive income are transferred to retained earnings.
c The cost of hedging reserve reflects the gain or loss on the portion excluded from the designated hedging instrument that relates to the currency basis element of our cross-currency swaps and forward points on certain foreign exchange contracts. It is initially recognised in other comprehensive income and accounted for similarly to gains or losses in the cash flow reserve.
d The translation reserve is used to record cumulative translation differences on the net assets of foreign operations. The cumulative translation differences are recycled to the income statement on disposal of the foreign operation.
e Reclassification on cash flow hedges in FY23 includes £472m reclassification from cash flow hedge reserve to cost of hedging reserve.
f Excludes £nil (FY23: £2m) of exchange differences in relation to retained earnings attributed to non-controlling interests.
g Movements in cash flow hedge-related reserves recognised in income and expense of £356m (FY23: £713m) include a net credit to other comprehensive income of £318m (FY23: charge of £679m) which have been reclassified to operating costs, and a net credit of £38m (FY23: charge of £34m) which have been reclassified to finance expense (see note 27).
Key management personnel comprise Executive and Non-Executive Directors and members of the Executive Committee. Compensation of key management personnel is disclosed in note 6. Amounts paid to the group’s retirement benefit plans are set out in note 19. Associates and joint ventures related parties include the Sports JV with Warner Bros formed during FY23 (see note 22). Sales of services to the Sports JV during FY24 were £33m (FY23: £23m), and purchases from the Sports JV were £299m (FY23: £176m) excluding £211m (FY23: £61m) additional payments made to settle the minimum guarantee liability (see note 17). The amount receivable from the Sports JV as at 31 March 2024 was £3m (FY23: 10m) and the amount payable to the Sports JV was £94m (FY23: £123m). As part of the BT Sport transaction, the group has committed to providing the Sports JV with a sterling Revolving Credit Facility (RCF), up to a maximum for £300m, for short-term liquidity required by the Sports JV to fund its working capital and commitments to sports rights holders. Amounts drawn down by the Sports JV under the RCF accrue interest at a market reference rate, consistent with the group’s external short-term borrowings. The outstanding balance under the RCF of £163m (FY23: £268m) is treated as a loan receivable and held at amortised cost, see note 16. The capacity of the RCF is expected to reduce to £200m during FY25. There is also a loan payable to the Sports JV of £11m (FY23: £11m), see note 26. The Sports JV has a foreign exchange hedging arrangement with the group to secure euros required to meet its commitments to certain sports rights holders; the group has external forward contracts in place to purchase the euros at an agreed sterling rate in order to mitigate its exposure to exchange risk. The group holds a £29m (FY23: £14m) derivative liability in respect of forward contracts provided to the Sports JV.
Transactions from commercial trading arrangements with associates and joint ventures, including the Sports JV, are shown below:
| 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
| At 31 March | At 31 March | |
| £m | £m | |
| Sales of services to associates and joint ventures | 37 | 29 |
| Purchases from associates and joint ventures | 338 | 216 |
| Amounts receivable from associates and joint ventures | 5 | 10 |
| Amounts payable to associates and joint ventures | 95 | 124 |
Other related party transactions include a dividend received from a joint venture of £12m (FY23: £nil) and in the prior year the purchase of energy from an entity controlled by the BT Pension Scheme until FY24. FY23 total purchases were £13m and £1m was due to the other party as at 31 March 2023.
Financial commitments as at 31 March 2024 include capital commitments of £1,049m (FY23: £1,480m) and device purchase commitments of £171m (FY23: £217m). TV programme rights commitments were transferred to the Sports JV formed with Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) during FY23 (see note 22). Both the group and WBD have guaranteed the Sports JV’s obligations under certain programme rights commitments; the fair value of these parent company guarantees is not material. Other than as disclosed below and in note 18, there were no contingent liabilities or guarantees at 31 March 2024 other than those arising in the ordinary course of the group’s business and on these no material losses are anticipated. We have insurance cover to certain limits for major risks on property and major claims in connection with legal liabilities arising in the course of our operations. Otherwise, the group generally carries its own risks. Legal and regulatory proceedings See note 18 for contingent liabilities associated with legal and regulatory proceedings.
We have re-presented certain FY23 comparatives to reflect changes to the methodology used to allocate certain shared costs, and the creation of our Business CFU. See note 1 for more details. The following disclosures are impacted by the creation of the Business unit only. Re-presentation of prior year comparatives is limited to the combination of the balances previously reported in respect of the Enterprise and Global units, with no further adjustments:
Note 4 Segment information is also impacted by changes to the allocation of shared costs and therefore includes additional adjustments. The tables below present a bridge between previously published financial information and re-presented comparatives for the affected disclosures (segment revenue and profit; internal revenue and costs; and capital expenditure). Also presented is a bridge in respect of the CFU normalised free cash flow comparatives which are re-presented in the Additional information on page 231.
Note 4 Segment information: Segment revenue and profit
| Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2023: published | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Segment revenue | 9,737 | 4,962 | 3,328 | — | 5,675 | 27 | 23,729 |
| Internal revenue | (57) | (113) | — | — | (2,890) | — | (3,060) |
| Adjusted a revenue from external customers | 9,680 | 4,849 | 3,328 | — | 2,785 | 27 | 20,669 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 2,623 | 1,394 | 458 | — | 3,449 | 4 | 7,928 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (1,397) | (842) | (317) | — | (2,059) | (138) | (4,753) |
| Adjusted a operating profit (loss) | 1,226 | 552 | 141 | — | 1,390 | (134) | 3,175 |
| b |
| | | Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2023: adjustments for creation of Business and change in cost allocation methodology | | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Segment revenue | | — | (4,962) | (3,328) | 8,258 | — | — | (32) |
| Internal revenue | | — | 113 | — | (81) | — | — | 32 |
| Adjusted a revenue from external customers | | — | (4,849) | (3,328) | 8,177 | — | — | — |
| Adjusted EBITDA | | (154) | (1,394) | (458) | 1,945 | 61 | — | — |
| Depreciation and amortisation | | (206) | 842 | 317 | (1,047) | 94 | — | — |
| Adjusted a operating profit (loss) | | (360) | (552) | (141) | 898 | 155 | — | — |
| b | | | | | | | |
| Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 March 2023: re-presented | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m |
| Segment revenue | 9,737 | — | — | 8,258 | 5,675 | 27 | 23,697 |
| Internal revenue | (57) | — | — | (81) | (2,890) | — | (3,028) |
| Adjusted a revenue from external customers | 9,680 | — | — | 8,177 | 2,785 | 27 | 20,669 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 2,469 | — | — | 1,945 | 3,510 | 4 | 7,928 |
| Depreciation and amortisation | (1,603) | — | — | (1,047) | (1,965) | (138) | (4,753) |
| Adjusted a operating profit (loss) | 866 | — | — | 898 | 1,545 | (134) | 3,175 |
| b |
Year ended 31 March 2023: published
| £m | Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal revenue recorded by Consumer | — | 40 | 16 | — | — | 1 | 57 |
| Enterprise | 26 | — | 32 | — | — | 55 | 113 |
| Global | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Business | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Openreach | 1,805 | 888 | 184 | — | — | 13 | 2,890 |
| Total | 1,831 | 928 | 232 | — | — | 69 | 3,060 |
Year ended 31 March 2023: adjustments for creation of Business and change in cost allocation methodology
| £m | Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer | — | (40) | (16) | 56 | — | — | — |
| Enterprise | (26) | — | (32) | — | — | (55) | (113) |
| Global | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Business | 26 | — | — | — | — | 55 | 81 |
| Openreach | — | (888) | (184) | 1,072 | — | — | — |
| Total | — | (928) | (232) | 1,128 | — | — | (32) |
Year ended 31 March 2023: re-presented
| £m | Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer | — | — | — | 56 | — | 1 | 57 |
| Enterprise | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Global | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Business | 26 | — | — | — | — | 55 | 81 |
| Openreach | 1,805 | — | — | 1,072 | — | 13 | 2,890 |
| Total | 1,831 | — | — | 1,128 | — | 69 | 3,028 |
Year ended 31 March 2023: published
| £m | Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 530 | 257 | 81 | — | 87 | 63 | 1,018 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 663 | 351 | 171 | — | 2,709 | 144 | 4,038 |
| Capital expenditure | 1,193 | 608 | 252 | — | 2,796 | 207 | 5,056 |
Year ended 31 March 2023: adjustments for creation of Business and change in cost allocation methodology
| £m | Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 22 | (257) | (81) | 361 | 14 | (59) | — |
| Property, plant and equipment | 6 | (351) | (171) | 525 | 37 | (46) | — |
| Capital expenditure | 28 | (608) | (252) | 886 | 51 | (105) | — |
Year ended 31 March 2023: re-presented
| £m | Consumer | Enterprise | Global | Business | Openreach | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 552 | — | — | 361 | 101 | 4 | 1,018 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 669 | — | — | 525 | 2,746 | 98 | 4,038 |
| Capital expenditure | 1,221 | — | — | 886 | 2,847 | 102 | 5,056 |
Additional information: Normalised free cash flow
| Year ended March 2023 | £m | Adjustments for creation of Business and change in cost allocation methodology £m | Published £m | Re-presented £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer | 1,147 | (184) | 963 | |
| Enterprise | 522 | (522) | — | |
| Global | 63 | (63) | — | |
| Business | — | 648 | 648 | |
| Openreach | 211 | 8 | 219 | |
| Other | (615) | 113 | (502) | |
| Normalised free cash flow | 1,328 | — | 1,328 |
33. Post balance sheet events
On 3 April 2024, BT issued a EUR 750m hybrid bond due on 3 October 2054 under our European Medium Term Note programme with a coupon of 5.125% until the first call date of 5.5 years.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 221
| At 31 March | Notes | £m (2024) | £m (2023) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | |||
| Investment in subsidiary undertaking | 2 | 11,346 | 11,278 |
| 11,346 | 11,278 | ||
| Current assets | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | a | 53 | 80 |
| Total assets less current liabilities | 11,299 | 11,206 | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Loans and other borrowings | b | 400 | 303 |
| Other payables | a | — | 26 |
| 400 | 329 | ||
| Equity | |||
| Ordinary shares | 499 | 499 | |
| Share premium | 1,051 | 1,051 | |
| Capital redemption reserve | 27 | 27 | |
| Own shares | (311) | (422) | |
| Profit and loss account | c | 9,633 | 9,722 |
| Total equity | 10,899 | 10,877 | |
| 11,299 | 11,206 |
a Current trade and other payables consists of loans from group undertakings of £13m (FY23: £15m) and other payables of £40m (FY23: £65m). Other payables mostly comprise the obligation to purchase own shares into trust via a forward contract.
b Loans and other borrowings consist of a loan from group undertakings of £400m (FY23: £303m). The loan attracts interest of SONIA plus 60 basis points (FY23: SONIA plus 60 basis points) and is not due within the 12 months after balance sheet date.
c As permitted by Section 408(3) of the Companies Act 2006, no profit and loss account of the company is presented. The profit for the financial year, dealt with in the profit and loss account of the company was £734m (FY23: loss of £1m).
The financial statements of the company on pages 222 to 225 were approved by the Board of Directors on 15 May 2024 and were signed on its behalf by:
Adam Crozier
Chairman
Allison Kirkby
Chief Executive
Simon Lowth
Chief Financial Officer
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 222
| Registered number | Called-up share capital | Share premium account | Capital redemption reserve | Own shares | Profit and loss account | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | £m | ||
| At 1 April 2022 | 499 | 1,051 | 27 | (274) | 10,430 | 11,733 | |
| Loss for the year | — | — | — | — | (1) | (1) | |
| Dividends paid | — | — | — | — | (753) | (753) | |
| Share-based payments | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | |
| Capital contribution in respect of share-based payments | — | — | — | — | 77 | 77 | |
| Net buyback of own shares | — | — | — | (148) | (34) | (182) | |
| At 31 March 2023 | 499 | 1,051 | 27 | (422) | 9,722 | 10,877 | |
| Profit for the year | — | — | — | — | 734 | 734 | |
| Dividends paid | — | — | — | — | (757) | (757) | |
| Share-based payments | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | |
| Capital contribution in respect of share-based payments | — | — | — | — | 68 | 68 | |
| Net buyback of own shares | — | — | — | 111 | (137) | (26) | |
| At 31 March 2024 | 499 | 1,051 | 27 | (311) | 9,633 | 10,899 |
a The allotted, called up and fully paid ordinary share capital of the company at 31 March 2024 was £499m (31 March 2023: £499m), representing 9,968,127,681 (31 March 2023: 9,968,127,681) ordinary shares of 5p each.
b In FY24, 57,073,057 shares (FY23: 18,984,595) were issued from Own shares to satisfy obligations under employee share schemes and executive share awards at a cost of £113m (FY23: £38m). At 31 March 2024, 16,299,007 shares (FY23: 36,190,551) with an aggregate nominal value of £1m (FY23: £2m) were held at cost as treasury shares and 172,157,686 shares (FY23: 193,798,578) with an aggregate nominal value of £9m (FY23: £10m) were held in the Trust.
c As permitted by Section 408(3) of the Companies Act 2006, no profit and loss account of the company is presented. The profit for the financial year, dealt with in the profit and loss account of the company, was £734m (FY23: loss of £1m).
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 223
Principal activity
The principal activity of the company is to act as the ultimate holding company of the BT Group.
Accounting basis
As used in these financial statements and associated notes, the term ‘company’ refers to BT Group plc (a public company limited by shares). These separate financial statements are prepared in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework (FRS 101). In preparing these financial statements, the Company applies the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements of UK-adopted international accounting standards, but makes amendments where necessary in order to comply with Companies Act 2006 and has set out below where advantage of the FRS 101 disclosure exemptions has been taken.
Financial statements
The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis and under the historical cost convention. Refer to page 150 for further details of this assessment. As permitted by Section 408(3) of the Companies Act 2006, the company’s profit and loss account has not been presented.
New and amended accounting standards effective during the year
The following amended standards were effective during the year, none of which had a material impact on the financial statements of the company.
Exemptions
As permitted by FRS 101, the company has taken advantage of the disclosure exemptions available under that standard in relation to business combinations, share-based payments, non-current assets held for sale, financial instruments, capital management, and presentation of comparative information in respect of certain assets, presentation of a cash flow statement, standards not yet effective, impairment of assets and related party transactions. The company intends to continue to take advantage of these exemptions in future years. Further detail is provided below. Where required, equivalent disclosures have been given in the consolidated financial statements of BT Group plc.
The BT Group plc consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2024 contain a consolidated cash flow statement. Consequently, as permitted by IAS 7 ‘Statement of Cash flow’, the company has not presented its own cash flow statement.
The BT Group plc consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2024 contain related party disclosures. Consequently, the company has taken advantage of the exemption in IAS 24 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ not to disclose transactions with other members of the BT Group.
The BT Group plc consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2024 contain financial instrument disclosures which comply with IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’. Consequently, the company is exempt from the disclosure requirements of IFRS 7 in respect of its financial instruments.# BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
Investment in subsidiary undertaking
Investment in subsidiary undertaking is stated at cost and reviewed for impairment if there are indicators that the carrying value may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised to the extent that the carrying amount cannot be recovered either by selling the asset or by continuing to hold the asset and benefiting from the net present value of the future cash flows (value in use) of the investment. Investment impairment is assessed at each reporting date. Estimating value in use and key assumptions used (discount rate and growth rate) in performing the impairment assessment are in line with how we assess the group’s goodwill in note 13 to the consolidated group financial statements. There is significant headroom between the carrying value of the investment and the calculated value in use. See Note 2 for further details.
Taxation
Full provision is made for deferred taxation on all temporary differences which have arisen but not reversed at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is regarded as more likely than not that there will be sufficient taxable profits from which the underlying timing differences can be deducted. The deferred tax balances are not discounted.
Dividends
Dividend distributions are recognised as a liability in the year in which the dividends are approved by the company’s shareholders for final dividends. Interim dividends are recognised when they are paid. Dividend income is recognised on receipt.
Share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Repurchased shares of the company are recorded in the balance sheet as part of Own shares and presented as a deduction from shareholders’ equity at cost.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand and current balances with banks and similar institutions, which are readily convertible to cash and are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value and have an original maturity of three months or less.
Share-based payments
The issuance by the company of share options and awards to employees of its subsidiaries represents additional capital contributions to its subsidiaries. An addition to the company’s investment in subsidiaries is recorded with a corresponding increase in equity shareholders’ funds. The additional capital contribution is determined based on the fair value of options and awards at the date of grant and is recognised over the vesting period.
| Total Cost £m | |
|---|---|
| At 1 April 2022 | 11,201 |
| Additions | 77 |
| At 31 March 2023 | 11,278 |
| Additions | 68 |
| At 31 March 2024 | 11,346 |
The company held a 100% investment in BT Group Investments Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, throughout FY24 and FY23. Additions of £68m (FY23: £77m) comprise capital contributions in respect of share-based payments.
Investment impairment is assessed at each reporting date to evaluate if there are indicators that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As market capitalisation was less than the cost of investment at points during the year we have performed an impairment review. This was performed in line with the Group goodwill impairment review as detailed in Note 13 of the consolidated accounts. Our FY24 assessment concluded that there remains significant headroom between the carrying value of the investment and the calculated value in use of the investment. We have exercised a number of assumptions in determining the future cash flows, discount rate and growth rate to arrive at this conclusion. Value in use is estimated by discounting future cash flows. Future cash flows are calculated on a nominal basis and based on risk-adjusted projections derived from the latest Board-approved five-year financial plans, representing management's best risk-adjusted estimate of future growth. This includes the direct and indirect impacts of inflation and associated mitigations. Plans reflect management’s expectations of revenue, EBITDA growth, capital expenditure, working capital and operating cash flows, based on past experience and future expectations of business performance, and form the basis of outlook issued by the group. The pre-tax discount rate used in performing the value in use calculation was 9.25%. The pre-tax discount rates applied to the cash flow forecasts are derived from our post-tax weighted average cost of capital. The assumptions used in the calculation of the group’s weighted average cost of capital are benchmarked to externally available data. In FY24 we have used perpetuity growth rates averaging 0.8% as determined based on the long-term growth prospects of each market. The growth rates have been benchmarked against external data for the relevant markets and analysts’ expectations. None of the growth rates applied exceed the expected average long-term growth rates for those markets or sectors. We consider there to be no reasonably possible scenario in which an impairment could occur within the next 12 months from the reporting date.
| Held directly | United Kingdom | Group interest in allotted capital | Share class | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Braham Street, London, E1 8EE, UnitedKingdom | BT Group Investments Limited | 100% | ordinary | ||
| BT Group Nominees Limited | 100% | ordinary | |||
| Held via other group companies | Algeria | ||||
| 20 Micro zone d’Activités Dar El Madina, Bloc B, Loc N01 Hydra, Alger, 16000, Algeria | BT Algeria Communications SARL | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Argentina | |||||
| Maipu No 1210, piso 8 (C1006), Buenos Aires, Argentina | BT Argentina S.R.L. | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Australia | |||||
| Level 20, 420 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia | BT Australasia Pty Limited | 100% | ordinary | ||
| 100% | preference | ||||
| Austria | |||||
| Louis-Häfliger-Gasse 10, 1210, Wien, Austria | BT Austria GmbH | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Azerbaijan | |||||
| AZ 1025 The Azure Business Center, 20th Floor, c/ o BDO Azerbaijan LLC, Z1025, Khatai district, Afiyaddin Jalilov 26, apt.177, Azerbaijan | BT Azerbaijan Limited, Limited Liability Company | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Bahrain | |||||
| Suite #2216, Building No. 2504, Road 2832, Al Seef, P.O. BOX 18259, Bahrain | BT Solutions Limited (Bahrain Branch) | b | 100% | – | |
| Bangladesh | |||||
| UTC Building, 19th Floor, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka, 1215, Bangladesh | BT Communications Bangladesh Limited | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Barbados | |||||
| 3rd Floor, The Goddard Building, Haggatt Hall, St. Michael, BB11059, Barbados | BT (Barbados) Limited | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Belarus | |||||
| 58 Voronyanskogo St, Office 89, Minsk 220007, Belarus | BT BELRUS Foreign Limited Liability Company | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Belgium | |||||
| Telecomlaan 9, 1831 Diegem, Belgium | BT Global Services Belgium BV | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Global Security Europe Limited – Belgian Branch | b | 100% | – | ||
| IP Trade SA | 100% | ordinary | |||
| Bermuda | |||||
| Century House, 16 Par-la-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM08, Bermuda | Communications Global Network Services Limited | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Bolivia | |||||
| Avda. 6 de Agosto N° 2700, Torre Empresarial CADECO, Piso 4, La Paz, Bolivia | BT Solutions Limited Sucursal Bolivia | b | 100% | – | |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | |||||
| Trg Heroja 10/1, Sarajevo, 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina | BTIH Teleconsult Drustvo sa organicenom odgovornoscu za posredovanje i zastupanje d.o.o. Sarajevo | 100% | – | ||
| Botswana | |||||
| Plot 2482b, Tshekedi Crescent, Extension 9, Gaborone, 211008, Bontleng, Botswana | BT Global Services Botswana (Proprietary) Limited | 100% | ordinary | ||
| Brazil | |||||
| Avenida Dr. Ruth Cardoso, 4777 – 14 andar, Pinheiros, São Paulo, SP, 05477-000, Brazil | BT Communications do Brasil Limitada | 100% | quotas | ||
| BT Global Communications do Brasil Limitada | 100% | quotas | |||
| Bulgaria | |||||
| 51B Bulgaria Blvd., fl. 4, Sofia, 1404, Bulgaria | BT Bulgaria EOOD | 100% | ordinary | ||
| BT Global Europe B.V. – Bulgaria branch | b | 100% | % – | ||
| Canada | |||||
| 100 King Steet West, Suite 6200, 1 Canadian Place, Toronto ON M5X 1B8, Canada | BT Canada Inc. | 100% | common | ||
| Chile | |||||
| Rosario Norte 407, Piso 6, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile | Servicios de Telecomunicaciones BT Global Networks Chile Limitada | 100% | ordinary | ||
| China | |||||
| Building 16, 6th Floor, Room 602-B, No. 269 Wuyi Road, Hi-tech Park, Dalian, 116023, China | BT Technology (Dalian) Company Limited | 100% | registered | ||
| No. 3 Dong San Huan Bei Lu, Chao Yang District, Beijing, 100027, China | BT Limited, Beijing Office | b | 100% | – | |
| Room 2101-2103, 21/F, International Capital Plaza, No. 1318 North Sichuan Road, Hong Kou District, Shanghai, 200080, China | BT China Limited- Shanghai Branch Office | b | 100% | – | |
| 1502-1503, AVIC Center, No. 1008, Huafu Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518000, China | BT China Limited – Shenzhen Branch | b | 100% | – | |
| Room 3, 4, F7, Tower W3, Oriental Plaza, 1 East Chang An Avenue, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100738, China | BT China Limited | 100% | registered | ||
| Unit 1537B, Floor 15th, No. |
Dividends
An interim dividend of 2.31p per share amounting to £227m was paid on 2 February 2024 (FY23: interim dividend of 2.31p per share amounting to £226m paid). A final dividend of 5.69p per share amounting to approximately £553m is proposed in respect of the year ended 31 March 2024 (FY23: final dividend of 5.39p per share amounting to £530m paid in respect of the year ended 31 March 2023).
Employees and directors
The Chairman and the Executive and Non-Executive Directors of BT Group plc were the only employees and directors of the company during FY24 and FY23. The costs relating to qualifying services provided to the company’s principal subsidiary, British Telecommunications plc, are recharged to that company.# BT Group plc
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class |
|---|---|---|
| China | ||
| Xili Road, Shanghai Free Trade Zone, Shanghai, China | ||
| BT China Communications Limited | 50% | ordinary |
| Colombia | ||
| Calle 113, 7-21,Torre A Oficina 1015 Teleport Business, Bogota, Colombia | ||
| BT Colombia Limitada | 100% | quotas |
| Costa Rica | ||
| Heredia-Belen La Ribera, Centro Corporativo El Cafeta, Edificio B, segundo piso, Oficinas de Deloitte, San José, Costa Rica | ||
| BT Global Costa Rica SRL | 100% | ordinary |
| Côte d’Ivoire | ||
| Abidjan Plateau, Rue du commerce, Immeuble Nabil 1er étage, 01 BP 12721 Abidjan 01, Côte d’Ivoire | ||
| BT Cote D’Ivoire | 100% | ordinary |
| Cyprus | ||
| Hadjianastassiou, Ioannides LLC, DELOITTE LEGAL, Maximos Plaza, Tower 3, 2nd Floor, 213 Arch. Makariou III Avenue, Limassol, 3030, Cyprus | ||
| BT Solutions Limited b | 100% – Arch. Makarios III, 213, Maximos Plaza, Tower 3, Floor 2, Limassol, 3030, Cyprus | |
| BT Global Europe B.V .b | 100% – | |
| Czech Republic | ||
| Pujmanové 1753 / 10a, Nusle, 140 00, Prague 4, Czech Republic | ||
| BT Global Europe B.V., odštěpný závod b | 100% – | |
| Denmark | ||
| Norre Farimagsgade 13, 4. th, 1364 Kobenhavn K, Denmark | ||
| BT Denmark ApS | 100% | ordinary |
| Dominican Republic | ||
| Av. Abraham Lincoln Esq. Jose Amado Soler, Edif. Progresso, Local 3-A, Sector Ens. Serralles, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic | ||
| BT Dominican Republic, S. A. | 100% | ordinary |
| Ecuador | ||
| Av. Amazonas N21-252 y Carrión, Edificio Londres, 4° Piso, Quito, Ecuador | ||
| BT Solutions Limited (Sucursal Ecuador) b | 100% – | |
| Egypt | ||
| Unit no. 306 Administrative Second Floor, AlSaraya Mall, Al Mehwar Al- Markazy, Giza,Egypt | ||
| BT Telecom Egypt LLC | 100% | stakes |
| El Salvador | ||
| Edificio Avante Penthouse Oficina, 10-01 Y 10-03 Urbanizacion, Madre Selva, Antiguo Cuscatlan, La Libertad, El Salvador | ||
| BT El Salvador, Limitada de Capital Variable | 100% | ordinary |
| Finland | ||
| Mannerheimvägen 12 B 6, 00100 Helsinki, Finland | ||
| BT Nordics Finland Oy | 100% | ordinary |
| France | ||
| Tour Ariane, 5 place de la Pyramide, La Defense Cedex, 92088, Paris, France | ||
| BT France S.A.S. | 100% | ordinary |
| Germany | ||
| Barthstraße 4, 80339, Munich, Germany | ||
| BT (Germany) GmbH & Co. oHG | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Deutschland GmbH | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Garrick GmbH | 100% | ordinary |
| Widdersdorfer Strasse 252, 50933, Cologne, Germany | ||
| Global Security Europe Limited – Germany Branch b | 100% – | |
| Ghana | ||
| 5th Floor, Vivo Place, Cantonments City, Rangoon Lane, P.O. Box MB 595, Accra, Ghana | ||
| BT Ghana Ltd | 100% | ordinary |
| Greece | ||
| 75 Patision Street, Athens, 10434, Greece | ||
| BT Solutions Limited- Greek Branch b | 100% – | |
| Guatemala | ||
| 5ta avenida 5-55 zona 14, Edificio Europlaza World Business Center, Torre IV, nivel 7, oficina 702, Guatemala City, Guatemala | ||
| BT Guatemala S.A. | 100% | unique |
| Honduras | ||
| Colonia Florencia Norte, Edificio Plaza America, 5to Piso, Tegucigalpa, Honduras | ||
| BT Sociedad De Responsabilidad Limitada | 100% | – |
| Hong Kong | ||
| Unit 31-105, 31/F, Hysan Place, 500 Hennessy Road, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong | ||
| BT Hong Kong Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Infonet China Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Hungary | ||
| 1112 Budapest, Boldizsár utca 4. , Hungary | ||
| BT Global Europe B.V. Magyarorszagi Fioktelepe b | 100% – | |
| BT Limited Magyarorszagi Fioktelepe b | 100% – | |
| BT ROC Kft | 100% | business |
| India | ||
| 11th Floor, Eros Corporate Tower, Opp. International Trade Tower, Nehru Place, New Delhi, 110019, India | ||
| BT (India) Private Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT e-Serv (India) Private Limited | 100% | equity |
| BT Global Business Services Private Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Global Communications India Private Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Telecom India Private Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| A-47, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, Delhi-DL, 110016, India | ||
| Orange Services India Private Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Indonesia | ||
| Menara Astra, 37F. JI. Jendral Sudirman Kav 5-6, Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta, 10220, Indonesia | ||
| PT BT Indonesia | 100% | ordinary |
| PT BT Communications Indonesia | 95% | ordinary |
| Isle of Man | ||
| Third Floor, St Georges Court, Upper Church Street, Douglas, IM1 1EE, Isle of Man | ||
| Belmullet Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Communicator Insurance Company Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Priestgate Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Israel | ||
| Beit Oz, 14 Abba Hillel Silver Rd, Ramat Gan, 52506, Israel | ||
| B.T. Communication Israel Ltd | 100% | ordinary |
| Italy | ||
| Via Mario Bianchini 15, 00142, Roma, Italy | ||
| BT Global Services Limited b | 100% – | |
| Via Tucidide 14, 20134, Milano, Italy | ||
| Atlanet SpA | 99% | ordinary |
| Basictel SpA | 99% | ordinary |
| BT Italia S.p.A. | 99% | ordinary |
| Jamaica | ||
| Suite #6, 9A Garelli Avenue , Half way tree, St. Andrew, Kingston 10, Jamaica | ||
| BT Jamaica Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Japan | ||
| ARK Mori Building, 12-32 Akasaka, 1-Chome, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 107 – 6024, Japan | ||
| BT Japan Corporation | 100% | ordinary |
| Jersey | ||
| 26 New Street, St Helier, JE2 3RA, Jersey | ||
| Ilford Trustees (Jersey) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| PO Box 264, Forum 4, Grenville Street, St Helier, JE4 8TQ, Jersey | ||
| BT Jersey Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Jordan | ||
| Wadi AlSer – Dahiet Prince Rashid – King Abdullah Street , Building No. 391 – 3rd Floor, Jordan | ||
| BT (International) Holdings Limited (Jordan) | 100% | ordinary |
| Kazakhstan | ||
| n.p.38b, Building 5, Kaiym Mukhamedkhanov Street, Nura District, Astana, Index 010000, Kazakhstan | ||
| BT Kazakhstan LLP | 100% | – |
| Kenya | ||
| L R No, 1870/ 1/176, Aln House, Eldama Ravine close, off Eldama Ravine Road, Westlands, P O Box 764, Sarit Centre, Nairobi, 00606, Kenya | ||
| BT Communications Kenya Limited | 70% | ordinary |
| Korea | ||
| Level 19, Hana Securities Building, 81, Uisadang- daero, Yeongdeungpogu, Seoul, 07321, Republic of Korea | ||
| BT Global Services Korea Limited | 100% | common |
| Latvia | ||
| Muitas iela 1A, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia | ||
| BT Latvia Limited, Sabiedriba ar ierobezotu atbildibu | 100% | ordinary |
| Lebanon | ||
| Abou Hamad, Merheb, Nohra & Chedid Law Firm, Chbaro Street, 22nd Achrafieh Warde Building, 1st Floor, Beirut, P.O.BOX 165126, Lebanon | ||
| BT Lebanon S.A.L. | 100% | ordinary |
| Lithuania | ||
| Aludariu str 2-33, LT-01113 Vilnius, Lithuania | ||
| UAB BTH Vilnius | 100% | ordinary |
| Luxembourg | ||
| 12 rue Eugene Ruppert, L 2453, Luxembourg | ||
| BT Global Services Luxembourg SARL | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Broadband Luxembourg Sàrl | 100% | ordinary |
| Malawi | ||
| KEZA Office Park Blocks 3, First Floor, Near Chichiri, Shopping Mall, Blantyre, Malawi | ||
| BT Malawi Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Malaysia | ||
| Level 5, Tower 3, Avenue 7, Bangsar South, No.8, Jalan Kerinchi, 59200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | ||
| BT Global Technology (M) Sdn. Bhd. | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Systems (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd | 100% | ordinary |
| Malta | ||
| Level 1, LM Complex, Brewery Street, Zone 3, Central Business District, Birkirkara CBD, 3040, Malta | ||
| BT Solutions Limited b | 100% – | |
| Mauritius | ||
| c/o Deloitte, 7th Floor Standard Chartered Tower, 19-21 Bank Street, Cybercity, Ebène, 72201, Mauritius | ||
| BT Global Communications (Mauritius) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Mexico | ||
| Boulevard Manuel Avila Camacho No. 32, 6th Floor, Lomas de Chapultepec III Section, Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City CP11000 | ||
| BT LatAm México, S.A. de C.V. | 100% | common |
| Montenegro | ||
| Vasa Raickovica 4b, Podgorica, Podgorica, Montenegro | ||
| BT Montenegro DOO | 100% | – |
| Morocco | ||
| Bd. Abdelmoumen, Immeuble Atrium, n 374, Lot. Manazyl Al Maymoune, 5eme etage, Casablanca, 20390, Morocco | ||
| BT Solutions Limited – Morocco Branch b | 100% – | |
| Mozambique | ||
| Avenida Kenneth Kaunda, number 660, Sommershield, Maputo City, Mozambique | ||
| BT Mozambique, Limitada | 100% | quotas |
| Namibia | ||
| Unit 3, 2nd floor, Ausspann Plaza, Dr Agostinho Neto Road, Ausspannplatz, Private Bag, Windhoek, 12012, Namibia | ||
| BT Solutions Limited b | 100% – | |
| Netherlands | ||
| Herikerbergweg 2, 1101 CM, Amsterdam, Netherlands | ||
| BT Global Europe B.V. | 100% | ordinary |
| BT (Netherlands) Holdings B.V. | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Nederland N.V. | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Professional Services Nederland B.V. | 100% | ordinary |
| Global Security Europe Limited b | 100% – | |
| New Zealand | ||
| c/o Deloitte, Level 18, 80 Queen Street, Auckland Central, Auckland, 1010, NewZealand | ||
| BT Australasia Pty Limited – New Zealand Branch b | 100% – | |
| Nicaragua | ||
| De donde fué el Restaurante Marea Alta Ahora quesillos, El Pipe, 2 cuadras al este, 10 Metros al norte, frente al, Hotel El Gran Marquez, Casa #351, Nicaragua, 2815, Nicaragua | ||
| BT Nicaragua S.A. | 100% | capital |
| Nigeria | ||
| Civic Towers, Plot GA1, Ozumba Mbadiwe Avenue, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria | ||
| BT (Nigeria) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| North Macedonia | ||
| Str. Dame Gruev no.8, 5th floor, Building “Dom na voenite invalidi”, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia | ||
| BT Solutions Limited Branch Office in Skopje b | 100% – | |
| Norway | ||
| Munkedamsveien 45, Oslo, 0121, Norway | ||
| BT Solutions Norway AS | 100% | ordinary |
| Oman | ||
| Maktabi Building, Building No. 458, Unit No. 413 4th Floor, Road No – R41, Block No. 203, Plot No. 107, Zone No. SW41, Complex No. 271, Al Watiyah, Bausher, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, Oman | ||
| BT International Holdings Limited & Co. LLC | 100% | ordinary |
| Pakistan | ||
| Cavish Court, A-35, Block 7&8, KCHSU, Shahrah-e-Faisal, Karachi, 75350, Pakistan | ||
| BT Pakistan (Private) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Panama | ||
| 50th and 74th Street, San Francisco, PH 909, 15th and 16th Floor, Panama City, Panama | ||
| BT de Panama, S.R.L. | 100% | ordinary |
| Paraguay | ||
| Av. Brasilia N° 767 casi Siria, Asunción, Paraguay | ||
| BT Paraguay S.R.L. | 100% | quotas |
| Peru | ||
| Av. La Mar 662 Of. 201 – Miraflores, Lima, Peru | ||
| BT Peru S.R.L. | 100% | ordinary |
| Philippines | ||
| 11th Floor, Page One Building, 1215 Acacia Ave Madrigal Business Park, Ayala Alabang, Muntinlupa, Metro Manila, 1780, Philippines | ||
| IT Holdings, Inc | 100% | ordinary |
| 40th Floor, PBCom Tower 6795, Ayala Avenue cor. Rufino St, Makati City, 1226, Philippines | ||
| BT Communications Philippines Incorporated | 100% | ordinary |
| c/o Sun Microsystems Phil Inc., 8767 Paseo de Roxas, Makati City, Philippines | ||
| PSPI-Subic, Inc | 51% | ordinary |
| Poland | ||
| 126/134 Marszalkowska St., Room 128, 00-008, Warsaw, Poland | ||
| BT Poland Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością | 100% | ordinary |
| Portugal | ||
| Rua D. |
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | ||
| Francisco Manuel de Melo 21-1, 1070-085 Lisboa, Portugal | ||
| BT Portugal – Telecomunicaçöes, Unipessoal Lda | 100% | ordinary |
| Puerto Rico | ||
| Corporation Service Company Puerto Rico Inc., c/ o RVM Professional Services LLC, A4 Reparto Mendoza, Humacao, 00791, Puerto Rico | ||
| BT Communications Sales, LLC Puerto Rico branch b | 100% | – |
| Qatar | ||
| 1413, 14th Floor, Al Fardan Office Tower, Doha, 31316, Qatar | ||
| BT Global Services (North Gulf) LLC | 49% | ordinary |
| Republic of Ireland | ||
| BDO Block 3 Miesian Plaza, 50-58 Baggot Street Lower, Dublin 2, Dublin, D02 Y754, Ireland | ||
| BT Global Communications (Ireland) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| 5th Floor, 2 Grand Canal Plaza, Upper Grand Canal Street, Dublin 4, Ireland | ||
| The Faraday Procurement Company Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| 2 Grand Canal Plaza, Upper Grand Canal Street, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland | ||
| BT Communications Ireland Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Communications Ireland Group Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Communications Ireland Holdings Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Whitestream Industries Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Romania | ||
| Cladirea A1, Biroul Nr. 52, Nr 35-37, Str. Oltenitei, Sector 4, Bucharest, Romania | ||
| BT Global Services Limited Londra Sucursala Bucuresti b | 100% | – |
| Russia | ||
| Room 62, prem xx, Floor 2, Pravdy, 26, 127137, Moscow, Russian Federation | ||
| BT Solutions Limited Liability Company | 100% | – |
| Serbia | ||
| Dimitrija Georgijevica Starike 20, Belgrade, 11070, Serbia | ||
| BT Belgrade d.o.o | 100% | ordinary |
| Sierra Leone | ||
| 84 Dundas Street, Freetown, Sierra Leone | ||
| BT (SL) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Singapore | ||
| Level 3, #03-01/02 & #03-04, Block B, Alexandra Technopark, 438B Alexandra Road, Singapore, 119968 | ||
| BT (India) Private Limited Singapore Branch b | 100% | – |
| BT Global Solutions Pte. Ltd. | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Singapore Pte. Ltd. | 100% | ordinary |
| Slovakia | ||
| Pribinova 10, 811 09, Bratislava , mestskó èast’ Staré Mesto, Slovakia | ||
| BT Global Europe B.V., o.z. b | 100% | – |
| BT Slovakia s.r.o. | 100% | ordinary |
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class |
|---|---|---|
| Slovenia | ||
| Cesta v Mestni Log 1, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia | ||
| BT GLOBALNE STORITVE, telekomunikacijske storitve, obdelava podatkov, podatkovnih baz; d.o.o. | 100% | ordinary |
| South Africa | ||
| BT Building, Woodmead North Office Park, 54 Maxwell Drive, Woodmead, Johannesburg, 2191, South Africa | ||
| BT Communications Services South Africa (Pty) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Limited b | 100% | – |
| Spain | ||
| C/ María Tubau, 3, 28050 de Madrid, Spain | ||
| BT Global ICT Business Spain SLU | 100% | ordinary |
| Sri Lanka | ||
| Level 03, No 11, Castle Lane, Colombo, 04, Sri Lanka | ||
| BT Communications Lanka (Private) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Sudan | ||
| Alskheikh Mustafa Building, Parlman Street, Khartoum, Sudan | ||
| Newgate Communication (Sudan) Co. Ltd | 100% | ordinary |
| Sweden | ||
| c/o 7A, Vasagatan 28, 111 20, Stockholm, Sweden | ||
| BT Nordics Sweden AB | 100% | ordinary |
| Switzerland | ||
| Richtistrasse 5, 8304 Wallisellen, Switzerland | ||
| BT Switzerland AG | 100% | ordinary |
| Taiwan | ||
| 11F, No. 1 Songzhi Rd, Xinyi Dist., Taipei City, 110411, Taiwan (Province of China) | ||
| BT Limited Taiwan Branch b | 100% | – |
| Tanzania | ||
| Region Dar Es Salaam, District Kinondoni, Ward Msasani, Street Msasani Peninsula, Road 1 Bains Singh Avenue, Plot number 1403/1, Ground Floor, 14111, United Republic of Tanzania | ||
| BT Solutions Limited – Tanzania Branch b | 100% | – |
| Thailand | ||
| No.63 Athenee Tower, 23rd Floor (CEO Suite, Room No.38), Wireless Road, Kwaeng Lumpini, Khet Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand | ||
| BT Siam Communications Co., Ltd | 49% | class B |
| BT Siam Limited | 69% | ordinary |
| 69% | preference | |
| Trinidad and Tobago | ||
| 2nd Floor CIC Building, 122-124 Frederick Street, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago | ||
| BT Solutions Limited b | 100% | – |
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class |
|---|---|---|
| Tunisia | ||
| Rue de I’, Euro Immeuble Slim, Block A-2nd floor-Les berges du Lac, Tunis, 1053, Tunisia | ||
| BT Tunisia S.A.R.L | 100% | ordinary |
| Turkey | ||
| Acıbadem Mahallesi Çeçen Sk. Akasya A , Kule Kent Etabı Apt. No: 25 A/28- , Üsküdar, Istanbul, Turkey | ||
| BT Bilisim Hizmetleri Anonim Şirketi | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Telekom Hizmetleri Anonim Şirketi | 100% | common |
| Uganda | ||
| Engoru, Mutebi Advocates, Ground Floor, Rwenzori House, 1 Lumumba Avenue, Kampala, 22510, Uganda | ||
| BT Solutions Limited b | 100% | – |
| Ukraine | ||
| Office 702, 34 Lesi Ukrainky Boulevard, Kyiv 01042, Ukraine | ||
| BT Ukraine Limited Liability Company | 100% | stakes |
| United Arab Emirates | ||
| Office No G03, Ground Floor, EIB Building No 04, Dubai, United Arab Emirates | ||
| BT MEA FZ-LLC | 100% | ordinary |
| Office no.206 BLOCK B, Diamond Business Center 1, Al Barsha South Third, Dubai, P.O. BOX 25205, United Arab Emirates | ||
| BT UAE Limited – Dubai Branch (1) b | 100% | – |
| BT UAE Limited – Dubai Branch (2) b | 100% | – |
| United Kingdom | ||
| 1 Braham Street, London, E1 8EE, United Kingdom | ||
| Autumnwindow Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Autumnwindow No.2 Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Autumnwindow No.3 Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Belmullet (IoM) Limited b | 100% | – |
| BPSLP Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| British Telecommunications plc | 100% | ordinary |
| Bruning Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT (International) Holdings Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT (RRS LP) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Communications Ireland Group Limited – UK Branch b | 100% | – |
| BT Corporate Trustee Limited | 100% | limited by guarantee |
| BT European Investments Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Fifty-One | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Fifty-Three Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Global Security Services Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Global Services Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Holdings Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class |
|---|---|---|
| BT IoT Networks Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Ninety-Seven Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Nominees Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT OnePhone Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Property Holdings (Aberdeen) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Property Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Sixty-Four Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT SLE Euro Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT SLE USD Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT Solutions Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BT UAE Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Communications Global Network Services Limited – UK Branch b | 100% | – |
| Communications Networking Services (UK) | 100% | ordinary |
| EE (Group) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| EE Group Investments Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| EE Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| EE Pension Trustee Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| ESAT Telecommunications (UK) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Extraclick Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Global Security Europe Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Mainline Communications Group Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Mainline Digital Communications Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Newgate Street Secretaries Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Numberrapid Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Orange Furbs Trustees Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Orange Home UK Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Orange Personal Communications Services Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Radianz Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Redcare Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Southgate Developments Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Tudor Minstrel | 100% | ordinary |
| Alexander Bain House, 15 York Street, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, G2 8LA, Scotland | ||
| BT Corporate Limited | 99% | ordinary |
| BT Falcon 1 LP | 51 % | – |
| Holland House (Northern) Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| BDO LLP, 5 Temple Square, Temple Street, Liverpool, L2 5RH, United Kingdom | ||
| BT Lancashire Services Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class |
|---|---|---|
| BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 | 229 Financial statements | |
| Kelvin House, 123 Judd Street, London, WC1H 9NP, United Kingdom | ||
| Openreach Limited | 100% | ordinary |
| Endeavour, Sheffield Digital Campus,1a Concourse Way, Sheffield, S1 2BJ, United Kingdom | ||
| Plusnet plc | 100% | ordinary |
| United States | ||
| c/o Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington DE 19808, United States | ||
| BT Americas Holdings Inc. | 100% | common |
| BT Americas Inc. | 100% | common |
| BT Communications Sales LLC | 100% | units |
| BT Federal Inc. | 100% | common |
| BT Procure L.L.C. | 100% | units |
| BT United States L.L.C. | 100% | units |
| Infonet Services Corporation | 100% | common |
| Uruguay | ||
| Rincón 487 Piso 11, Montevideo, ZIP CODE 11.000, Uruguay | ||
| BT Solutions Limited Sucursal Uruguay b | 100% | – |
| Venezuela | ||
| Calle Guaicaipuro, Urbanizacion El Rosal, Municipio Chacao, Oficina 11B, Piso 11, Torre Forum, Caracas, Venezuela | ||
| BT LatAm Venezuela, S.A. | 100% | ordinary |
| Vietnam | ||
| 16th Floor Saigon Tower, 29 Le Duan Road, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, 710000, Socialist Republic of Vietnam | ||
| BT (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. | 100% | ordinary |
| Zambia | ||
| Plot No. 11058, Haile Selassie Avenue, Zimbabwe, Lusaka, Lusaka Province, 34972, Zambia | ||
| BT Solutions Limited b | 100% | – |
| Zimbabwe | ||
| 6th Floor, Goldbridge Eastgate, Sam Nujoma Street Harare, Post Box 10400, Zimbabwe | ||
| Numberrapid Limited b | 100% | – |
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class | Held via other group companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Associates (note 24) | |||
| Mauritius | |||
| IFS Court, Bank Street, TwentyEight Cybercity, Ebene, 72201, Mauritius | |||
| Mahindra – BT Investment Company (Mauritius) Limited | 43% | ordinary | |
| Philippines | |||
| 32F Philam Life Tower, 8767 Paseo de Roxas, Makati City, Philippines | |||
| ePLDTSunphilcox JV, Inc | 20% | ordinary | |
| SunPhilcox JV, Inc | 20% | ordinary | |
| United Kingdom | |||
| 24/25 The Shard, 32 London Bridge Street, London, SE1 9SG, United Kingdom | |||
| Digital Mobile Spectrum Limited | 25% | ordinary | |
| 10 Stadium Business Court , Millennium Way, Pride Park , Derby, DE24 8HP, United Kingdom | |||
| Midland Communications Distribution Limited | 35% | ordinary | |
| Phoneline (M.C.D) Limited | 35% | ordinary | |
| 2nd Floor, Aldgate Tower, 2 Leman Street, London, E1 8FA, United Kingdom | |||
| Youview TV Limited | 14% | voting |
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class | Held via other group companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joint ventures (note 24) | |||
| United Kingdom | |||
| Chiswick Park Building 2, 566 Chiswick High Road, London, W4 5YB, United Kingdom | |||
| TNT Sports Broadcasting Limited c | 50% | ordinary | |
| 6th Floor, One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EB, United Kingdom | |||
| Internet Matters Limited | 25% | ||
| 80 Fenchurch Street , London, EC3M 4AE, United Kingdom | |||
| Rugby Radio Station (General Partner) Limited | 50% | ordinary | |
| Rugby Radio Station (Nominee) Limited | 50% | ordinary | |
| St Helen’s, 1 Undershaft, London, EC3P 3DQ, United Kingdom | |||
| Rugby Radio Station LP | 50% |
All joint ventures are governed by a joint venture agreement.# Joint operations
| Company name | Group interest in allotted capital a | Share class | Held via other group companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom 450 Longwater Avenue, Green Park, Reading, Berkshire, RG2 6GF, United Kingdom | Mobile Broadband Network Limited | 50% ordinary | EE Limited and Hutchison 3G UK Limited (together ‘the Companies’) each have a 50% share in the joint operation Mobile Broadband Network Limited (‘MBNL’). MBNL’s ongoing purpose is the operation and maintenance of radio access sites for mobile networks through a sharing arrangement. This includes: (i) the efficient management of shared infrastructure and a 3G network on behalf of the Companies, (ii) acquiring certain network elements for shared use, and (iii) coordinating the deployment of new sites, infrastructure and networks on either a shared or a unilateral basis (unilateral elements being network assets or services specific to one company only). The group is committed to incurring 50% of costs in respect of restructuring the shared MBNL network, a broadly similar proportion of the operating costs (which varies in line with usage), and 100% of any unilateral elements. MBNL is accounted for as a joint operation. Guarantees for the joint operation are given by British Telecommunications plc and CK Hutchison Holdings Limited. The principal place of business of the joint operation is in the UK. a The proportion of voting rights held corresponds to the aggregate interest in percentage held by the holding company and subsidiaries undertaking. b No shares issued for a branch. c BT Ninety-Five Limited name changed to TNT Sports Broadcasting Limited. In addition to the 50% ordinary A shares we also hold A preference shares and C preference shares, see note 24 for more details. |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
230
Financial statements
Related undertakings continued
Introduction
We assess the performance of the group using a variety of alternative performance measures that are not defined under IFRS and are therefore termed non-GAAP measures. The non-GAAP measures we use are: adjusted revenue, adjusted operating costs, adjusted finance expense, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted operating profit, adjusted profit before tax, adjusted earnings per share, return on capital employed, normalised free cash flow and net debt. We also reference adjusted revenue and adjusted EBITDA on a Sports JV pro forma basis. The rationale for using these measures, along with a reconciliation from the nearest measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, is presented below. The alternative performance measures we use may not be directly comparable with similarly titled measures used by other companies.
Specific items
Our income statement and segmental analysis separately identify trading results on an adjusted basis, being before specific items. The directors believe that presentation of the group’s results in this way is relevant to an understanding of the group’s financial performance as specific items are those that in management’s judgement need to be disclosed by virtue of their size, nature or incidence. This presentation is consistent with the way that financial performance is measured by management and reported to the Board and the Executive Committee and assists in providing an additional analysis of our reporting trading results. In determining whether an event or transaction is specific, management considers quantitative as well as qualitative factors. Examples of charges or credits meeting the above definition and which have been presented as specific items in the current and/or prior years include significant business restructuring programmes such as the current group-wide cost transformation and modernisation programme, acquisitions and disposals of businesses and investments, impairment of goodwill, charges or credits relating to retrospective regulatory matters, property rationalisation programmes, historical property-related provisions, significant out of period contract settlements, net interest on our pension obligation, and the impact of remeasuring deferred tax balances. In the event that items meet the criteria, which are applied consistently from year to year, they are treated as specific items. Any releases to provisions originally booked as a specific item are also classified as specific. Conversely, when a reversal occurs in relation to a prior year item not classified as specific, the reversal is not classified as specific in the current year. Movements relating to the sports joint venture (Sports JV) with Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD), such as fair value gains or losses on the A and C preference shares or impairment charges on the equity-accounted investment as specific. Refer to note 24 for further detail. Details of items meeting the definition of specific items in the current and prior year are set out in note 9. Reported revenue, reported operating costs, reported operating profit, reported net finance expense, reported profit before tax and reported earnings per share are the equivalent IFRS measures. A reconciliation from these can be seen in the group income statement on page 145.
Net debt and net financial debt
Net debt consists of loans and other borrowings, lease liabilities (both current and non-current) less current asset investments and cash and cash equivalents, including items which have been classified as held for sale on the balance sheet. Amounts due to joint ventures, loans and borrowings recognised in relation to monies received from the sale of cash flows of contract assets and as prepayment for the forward sale of redundant copper are excluded. Currency-denominated balances within net debt are translated to sterling at swap rates where hedged. Fair value adjustments and accrued interest applied to reflect the effective interest method are removed. Net debt is a measure of the group’s net indebtedness that provides an indicator of overall balance sheet strength. It is a key indicator used by management to assess both the group’s cash position and its indebtedness. The use of the term ‘net debt’ does not necessarily mean that the cash included in the net debt calculation is available to settle the liabilities included in this measure. As aligned with our normalised free cash flow metric, from FY24 onwards we exclude loans and borrowings recognised in relation to:
– Asset monetisation programmes, in which monies received from the sale of cash flows of contract assets are recorded as liabilities (and the contract asset is not derecognised) until certain performance obligations in the contract are fulfilled and the right to consideration becomes unconditional. Excluding these liabilities is considered to improve the relevance of the net debt metric as it is consistent with the treatment of related cash flows in normalised free cash flow as noted above; and aligns with the underlying rationale and management’s view that substantially all the risks and rewards associated with ownership of these assets have been transferred to the end buyer. These liabilities do not reflect the group’s indebtedness as they will be extinguished upon the transfer of ringfenced operational cash flows from end customers which management are confident will be received.
– Monies received as prepayment for the forward sale of redundant copper, which are recognised as liabilities until there is physical delivery of the copper (further details in note 26). Excluding these liabilities is again considered to improve the relevance of the net debt metric by aligning with the treatment of related cash flows in normalised free cash flow and the fact that balances are not representative of the group’s true indebtedness given that they will be settled by the physical delivery of copper, rather than cash or any other financial asset.
Net financial debt is net debt excluding lease liabilities. It allows for the comparison to net debt measures reported before the introduction of IFRS 16 on 1 April 2019, and reflects a view that lease liabilities are operational debt in substance, rather than financing transactions. Net debt and net financial debt are considered to be alternative performance measures as they are not defined in IFRS. A reconciliation from loans and other borrowings, lease liabilities, cash and cash equivalents, and current asset investments, the most directly comparable IFRS measures to net debt and net financial debt, is set out in note 26.
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024
231
Financial statements
Additional information
We use a return on capital employed (ROCE) measure that serves as an indicator of how efficiently we generate returns from the capital invested in the business. It is a group KPI that is directly relatable to the outcome of investment decisions. ROCE represents the group’s returns as percentage of capital employed. Returns are defined as adjusted earnings before interest and tax. We use an adjusted measure (before specific items) for the reasons explained in the ‘specific items’ section above. Capital employed represents equity, debt and debt-like liabilities. We net the derivative financial instruments and cash and cash equivalent balances that we use to manage financial risk against gross debt, and exclude current and deferred tax balances as the measure is determined on a pre-tax basis. From FY24 we also exclude amounts due to joint ventures, loans and borrowings recognised in relation to monies received from the sale of cash flows of contract assets and as prepayment for the forward sale of redundant copper. In line with the net debt definition on page 231. In the table below we have restated the FY23 comparative to align with the updated definition and excluded £11m net loans from joint ventures, however it has not changed the ROCE metric from the previously reported 8.3%.# Return on capital employed
While our long-term capital investment programmes such as our full fibre rollout deliver value-creating long-term returns, they suppress ROCE in the short- to medium-term. The following table sets out the calculation of our ROCE measure. In doing so it reconciles returns to operating profit, the most directly comparable IFRS measure, and presents the components of capital employed.
| 2024 £m | 2023 (restated) £m | Year ended 31 March | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported operating profit for the period | 2,214 | 2,619 | |
| Share of post tax profits (losses) of associates and joint ventures | (21) | (59) | |
| Specific items (non-finance and tax) | 987 | 556 | |
| Return for the period | 3,180 | 3,116 | |
| Equity, debt and debt-like liabilities | |||
| Loans and other borrowings | 18,526 | 18,521 | |
| Lease liabilities | 4,955 | 5,359 | |
| Retirement benefit obligations | 4,882 | 3,139 | |
| BDUK grant funding deferral | 228 | 427 | |
| Total equity | 12,518 | 14,514 | |
| Adjust for balances used to hedge financial risk | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | (414) | (392) | |
| Investments | (2,395) | (3,577) | |
| Net derivative financial instruments | (531) | (1,096) | |
| Adjust for tax balances | |||
| Net deferred tax liabilities | 485 | 911 | |
| Net current tax receivable | (331) | (349) | |
| Adjust in line with net debt definition | |||
| Net loans with joint ventures | (11) | (11) | |
| Loans related to sale of contract assets | (318) | — | |
| Loans related to the forward sale of redundant copper | (106) | — | |
| Capital employed | 37,488 | 37,446 | |
| Return on capital employed | 8.5 % | 8.3 % |
In addition to measuring financial performance of the group and customer-facing units based on adjusted operating profit, we also measure performance based on adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as the group profit or loss before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation and amortisation and share of post tax profits or losses of associates and joint ventures. We consider adjusted EBITDA to be a useful measure of our operating performance because it approximates the underlying operating cash flow by eliminating depreciation and amortisation. Adjusted EBITDA is not a direct measure of our liquidity, which is shown by our cash flow statement, and needs to be considered in the context of our financial commitments. A reconciliation of reported profit for the period, the most directly comparable IFRS measure, to adjusted EBITDA, is set out below.
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | Year ended 31 March | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported profit for the period | 855 | 1,905 | |
| Tax | 331 | (176) | |
| Reported profit before tax | 1,186 | 1,729 | |
| Net finance expense | 1,007 | 831 | |
| Depreciation and amortisation, including impairment charges | 5,398 | 4,818 | |
| Specific revenue | 38 | (12) | |
| Specific operating costs before depreciation and amortisation | 450 | 503 | |
| Share of post tax losses (profits) of associates and joint ventures | 21 | 59 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | 8,100 | 7,928 |
Normalised free cash flow is one of the group’s key performance indicators by which our financial performance is measured. It is primarily a liquidity measure. However, we also believe it is an important indicator of our overall operational performance as it reflects the cash we generate from operations after capital expenditure and financing costs, both of which are significant ongoing cash outflows associated with investing in our infrastructure and financing our operations. Normalised free cash flow is defined as free cash flow (net cash inflow from operating activities after net capital expenditure) after net interest paid, payment of lease liabilities, net cash flows from the sale of cash flows related to contract assets, monies received as prepayment for the sale of redundant copper, dividends received from non-current asset investments, associates and joint ventures, and net purchase or disposal of non-current asset investments, before pension deficit payments (including their cash tax benefit), payments relating to spectrum, and specific items. It excludes cash flows that are determined at a corporate level independently of ongoing trading operations such as dividends paid, share buybacks, acquisitions and disposals, repayment and raising of debt, cash flows relating to short-term funding arrangements with joint ventures, and cash flows relating to the Building Digital UK demand deposit account which have already been accounted for within normalised free cash flow. For non-tax related items the adjustments are made on a pre-tax basis. As reflected above and communicated in our FY23 annual report, from FY24 we have updated our normalised free cash flow metric to reflect the ongoing evolution of the business: – We include the sale of cash flows of contract assets related to mobile handsets where the performance obligations have been substantially delivered to the customer. This is a financing cash flow in the cash flow statement as certain performance obligations in the contract need to be fulfilled before the right to consideration is unconditional. The underlying rationale for entering into these transactions is however for the purpose of working capital management as handset costs are incurred up front but recovered throughout the customer contract term. We BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 232 Financial statements Additional information continued therefore view the related cash flows as equivalent to working capital cash flows internally, and consider that they should be treated in the same way as operating cash inflows in our external normalised free cash flow metric in order to provide the most relevant information to the users of the financial statements. The corresponding operating cash inflow received from customers is excluded from normalised free cash flow if it has previously been included at the time of the sale of the contract assets. – We include monies received as prepayment for the forward sale of future redundant copper. In the cash flow statement this will be recorded within cash flows from investing activities as a separate line item, and will be the only cash flow recognised in respect of the transaction. We therefore consider it necessary to include the inflow within normalised free cash flow to align with the treatment of cash flows from all other purchases and disposals of property, plant and equipment. Normalised free cash flow is not a measure of the funds that are available for distribution to shareholders. A reconciliation from cash inflow from operating activities, the most directly comparable IFRS measure, to free cash flow and normalised free cash flow, is set out below.
| 2024 £m | 2023 £m | Year ended 31 March | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash generated from operations a | 6,012 | 6,588 | |
| Tax paid | (59) | 136 | |
| Net cash inflow from operating activities | 5,953 | 6,724 | |
| Net purchase of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets | (4,967) | (5,307) | |
| Free cash flow | 986 | 1,417 | |
| Interest received | 140 | 41 | |
| Interest paid | (865) | (709) | |
| Payment of lease liabilities | (748) | (727) | |
| Dividends received from joint ventures, associates and investments | 20 | 9 | |
| Net purchase of non-current asset investments | — | (5) | |
| Add back pension deficit payments | 823 | 994 | |
| Add back net cash flow from specific items | 439 | 404 | |
| Net cashflows from sale of contract assets related to handsets | 305 | — | |
| Cash flows relating to the BDUK demand deposit account | 75 | (96) | |
| Prepayment for forward sale of copper | 105 | — | |
| Normalised free cash flow | 1,280 | 1,328 |
a Includes £247m outflow (FY23: £259m inflow) related to utilisation of a supply chain financing programme; year on year cash outflow of £506m.
Below we reconcile normalised free cash flow by unit:
| 2024 £m | 2023 (re-presented) a £m | Year ended 31 March | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer | 1,023 | 963 | |
| Business | 431 | 648 | |
| Openreach | 590 | 219 | |
| Other | (764) | (502) | |
| Normalised free cash flow | 1,280 | 1,328 |
a Comparatives for the year ended 31 March 2023 have been re-presented for the impact of the creation of our Business customer-facing unit and a change in the methodology used to allocate shared central costs. For more information see note 1, and for a bridge to prior period published financial information see note 32.
On 3 September 2022 BT Group and Warner Bros. Discovery announced completion of their transaction to form a 50:50 sports joint venture (Sports JV) combining the assets of BT Sport and Eurosport UK. On 18 October 2022 we published unaudited pro forma financial information estimating the impact on the group as if trading in relation to BT Sport had been equity accounted for in previous periods, akin to the Sports JV being in place historically. Within this annual report we reference pro forma information relating to the prior year ended 31 March 2023. The table below provides a bridge between financial information on a reported basis and a Sports JV pro forma basis (reported basis re- presented, see note 32).
| Reported basis (re- presented, see note 32) 2023 £m | Sports JV pro forma adjustment 2023 £m | Sports JV pro forma basis 2023 £m | Year ended 31 March | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted revenue | ||||
| Consumer | 9,737 | (238) | 9,499 | |
| BT Group | 20,669 | (238) | 20,431 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | ||||
| Consumer | 2,469 | 71 | 2,540 | |
| BT Group | 7,928 | 71 | 7,999 | |
| Normalised free cash flow | ||||
| Consumer | 963 | 123 | 1,086 | |
| BT Group | 1,328 | — | 1,328 |
BT Group plc Annual Report 2024 233 Financial statements
Certain information included in this Annual Report and Accounts is forward looking and involves risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward looking statements. Forward looking statements cover all matters which are not historical facts and include, without limitation, projections relating to results of operations and financial conditions and the Company’s plans and objectives for future operations. Forward looking statements can be identified by the use of forward looking terminology, including terms such as ‘believes’, ‘estimates’, ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘forecasts’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘projects’, ‘goal’, ‘target’, ‘aim’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology. Forward looking statements in this Annual Report and Accounts are not guarantees of future performance.All forward looking statements in this Annual Report and Accounts are based upon information known to the Company on the date of this Annual Report and Accounts. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that any particular expectation will be met and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which speak only at their respective dates. Additionally, forward looking statements regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as a representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future. Other than in accordance with its legal or regulatory obligations (including under the UK Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority), the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Nothing in this Annual Report and Accounts shall exclude any liability under applicable laws that cannot be excluded in accordance with such laws.
We connect for good
This annual report contains important information on our financial and operating performance which can also be found online.
Scan to switch to digital
BT Group plc
Registered office: 1 Braham Street, London E1 8EE
Registered in England and Wales No. 4190816
Produced by BT Group PHME 88342
Design by emperor.works
Printed on Revive 50 Silk FSC® certified paper, made from 50% de-inked post-consumer waste and 50% virgin fibre from well managed forests and other controlled sources. The inks used are 100% vegetable oil based, printed in the UK by Pureprint Group an FSC® certified Carbon Neutral company.
bt.com
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.