AI assistant
BHP Group Limited — Capital/Financing Update 2016
Jan 28, 2016
14787_rns_2016-01-28_2c93aef2-8b5c-4346-9060-6cbbb072ced1.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [121 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
29 January 2016
ST GEORGE COMPLETES ACQUISITION OF MT ALEXANDER PROJECT
HIGHLIGHTS:
-
St George finalises acquisition of 75% interest in the high grade nickel‐copper sulphide Mt Alexander Project from BHP Billiton
-
Western Areas retains a 25% interest in the Project and has also become a shareholder in St George
-
A high quality addition to St George’s growing WA project portfolio
-
Drilling programme planned by St George in 2016
HIGH GRADE NICKEL‐COPPER SULPHIDE PROJECT – ACQUISITION COMPLETED
St George Mining Limited (ASX: SGQ ) (‘St George’ or ‘the Company’) is pleased to announce it has completed the previously announced acquisition of a 75% interest in the Mt Alexander Project from BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd (“Nickel West”).
The completion of the acquisition follows satisfaction of all conditions precedent under the Sale Agreement signed by the parties. The acquisition by St George includes all technical and exploration data for the Project from Nickel West.
St George has also allotted 3,500,000 ordinary shares to Western Areas Limited, which agreed to not exercise its right of pre‐emption over Nickel West’s interest in the Mt Alexander Project. For further details of the terms for the acquisition of the Mt Alexander Project, see our ASX Release dated 17 December 2015 “New High Grade Nickel‐Copper Sulphide Project” .
St George Mining Executive Chairman, John Prineas said:
“This is an important strategic acquisition for St George which we believe will deliver significant value for our shareholders.
“Very impressive intersections of shallow high grade nickel‐copper sulphides have already been discovered by drilling at Mt Alexander.
”We are looking forward to our first drilling campaign at Mt Alexander, and the opportunity to make further significant discoveries of high grade mineralisation.”
The Mt Alexander Project is an outstanding low‐risk exploration project in a world class nickel region of Western Australia, and offers tremendous exploration upside for St George.
The Project is located 120km south‐southwest of the Agnew‐Wiluna belt which hosts numerous world class nickel deposits. St George will be the Manager of the Project with Western Areas retaining a 25% non‐ contributing interest in the Project until there is a decision to mine.
1
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [121 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
High grade nickel‐copper sulphides were discovered at the Mt Alexander Project in 2008 from drilling at the Cathedrals Prospect. The nickel‐copper sulphides were discovered by drill testing below isolated nickel‐iron gossans hosted in granites.
Follow‐up drilling targeting electromagnetic (EM) conductors at Cathedrals resulted in further significant high grade nickel‐copper sulphide intersections including:
-
4m @ 4.9%Ni, 1.7%Cu and 3.9g/t total PGEs from 91.4m in drill hole MAD12
-
3m @ 3.8%Ni, 1.6%Cu and 2.7g/t total PGEs from 56.3m in drill hole MAD13
-
6m @ 3.3%Ni, 1.5%Cu and 2.7g/t total PGEs from 60m in drill hole MARC49
The drill holes intersected massive, matrix and disseminated sulphides at shallow depth. Figures 1 and 2 show sections of the drill core from MAD12 and MAD13 with massive nickel‐copper sulphides in komatiite ultramafics.
The Cathedrals Fault that hosts the mineralised komatiites remains largely untested along strike from the Cathedrals Prospect.
==> picture [424 x 231] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1 – high grade nickel‐copper sulphides in komatiite ultramafic in MAD12
==> picture [425 x 120] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2 – high grade nickel‐copper sulphides in komatiite ultramafic on contact with granite in MAD13
2
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [121 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
St George has initiated a detailed geological review of the exploration data for the Mt Alexander Project. The first joint venture meeting with Western Areas’ technical team will take place next week, with a view to preparing a multi‐phase exploration programme for Mt Alexander in 2016. A further announcement regarding proposed exploration at Mt Alexander, including the next drill programme to test nickel sulphide targets, will be made soon.
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [396 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [395 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3 – a map showing the location of Mt Alexander Project over TMI magnetics. The Hawaii Project was also recently acquired by St George from Nickel West.
In October 2015, St George completed the 100% acquisition of exploration licence E29/548 from Nickel West which covers 45.12 sq km. In addition, St George has lodged an application for exploration licence E29/954 which covers 41.72 sq km.
3
ASX / MEDIA RELEASE
==> picture [121 x 55] intentionally omitted <==
These two tenements are owned 100% by St George, with E29/638 – the tenement that hosts the Cathedrals Prospect – being a joint venture between Western Areas (25%) and St George (75%).
All three tenements are contiguous and provide St George with approximately 165 sq km of highly prospective ground in this under‐explored area.
TRANSACTION TERMS
The consideration payable to Nickel West by St George for the acquisition of the 75% interest in the Mt Alexander Project is $300,000.
Other key commercial terms of the acquisition are:
-
1) Nickel West has off‐take rights to St George’s share of any nickel produced from the Project;
-
2) Nickel West may charge a base royalty of 1% of the proceeds from St George’s share of any mineral production at the Project; and
-
3) Nickel West may charge an additional royalty of 1% of the proceeds from St George’s share of any nickel produced from the Project provided that the additional royalty is only payable if a minimum measured and indicated JORC resource of at least 25,000 tonnes of contained nickel is defined at the Project and payments of the additional royalty start 12 months after commercial production from the Project.
For further information, please contact:
John Prineas Colin Hay Executive Chairman Professional Public Relations St George Mining Limited (+61) 08 9388 0944 mob 0404 683 355 (+61) 411 421 253 [email protected] [email protected]
Competent Person Statement:
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Matthew McCarthy, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr McCarthy is employed by St George Mining Limited.
Mr McCarthy has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr McCarthy consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
4
The following sections are provided for compliance with requirements for the reporting of exploration results under the JORC Code, 2012 Edition.
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut | This ASX Release dated 29 January 2016 reports on the acquisition |
| techniques | channels, random chips, or specific specialised | by St George Mining Limited (“St George”) of a majority 75% interest |
| industry standard measurement tools |
in the Mt Alexander Project which is encompassed in E29/638. | |
| appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting |
This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling exploration work. |
|
| the broad meaning of sampling. | ||
| Include reference to measures taken to ensure | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| sample representivity and the appropriate | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| calibration of any measurement tools or | exploration work. | |
| systems used. | ||
| Aspects of the determination of mineralisation | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| that are Material to the Public Report. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has | exploration work. | |
| been done this would be relatively simple (eg | ||
| ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain | ||
| 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to | ||
| produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other | ||
| cases more explanation may be required, such | ||
| as where there is coarse gold that has inherent | ||
| sampling problems. Unusual commodities or | ||
| mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) | ||
| may warrant disclosure of detailed |
||
| information. | ||
| Drilling | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open‐ | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| techniques | hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple | exploration work. | |
| or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face‐ sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
References to reverse circulation and diamond drilling on E29/638 are to drilling conducted by BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd (“Nickel West”), the party from which St George has acquired its 75% |
|
| majority interest in the tenement (see Section:Exploration Done by | ||
| Other Parties) | ||
| Drill sample | Method of recording and assessing core and | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| recovery | chip sample recoveries and results assessed. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| exploration work. | ||
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| and ensure representative nature of the | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| samples. | exploration work. |
1
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Whether a relationship exists between sample | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| recovery and grade and whether sample bias | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| may have occurred due to preferential | exploration work. | |
| loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | ||
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| geologically and geotechnically logged to a | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| level of detail to support appropriate Mineral | exploration work. | |
| Resource estimation, mining studies and | ||
| metallurgical studies. | ||
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| photography. | exploration work. | |
| The total length and percentage of the relevant | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| intersections logged. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| exploration work. | ||
| Sub‐sampling | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| techniques and | quarter, half or all core taken. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| sample | exploration work. | |
| preparation | ||
| If non‐core, whether riffled, tube sampled, | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| dry. | exploration work. | |
| For all sample types, the nature, quality and | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| appropriateness of the sample preparation | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| technique. | exploration work. | |
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub‐ | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| sampling stages to maximise representivity of | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| samples. | exploration work. | |
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| representative of the in situ material collected, | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| including for instance results for field | exploration work. | |
| duplicate/second‐half sampling. | ||
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| grain size of the material being sampled. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| exploration work. | ||
| Quality of | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| assay data and | assaying and laboratory procedures used and | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| laboratory | whether the technique is considered partial or | exploration work. |
| tests | total. |
2
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
|
| XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
|
| determining the analysis including instrument | exploration work. |
|
| make and model, reading times, calibrations | ||
| factors applied and their derivation, etc. | ||
| Nature of quality control procedures adopted | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
|
| (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
|
| laboratory checks) and whether acceptable | exploration work. |
|
| levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and | ||
| precision have been established. | ||
| Verification of | The verification of significant intersections by | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| sampling and | either independent or alternative company | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| assaying | personnel. | exploration work. |
| Significant intersections discussed in this ASX release were checked | ||
| by St George personnel using assay data supplied by Nickel West. | ||
| The use of twinned holes. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | ||
| exploration work. | ||
| Documentation of primary data, data entry | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| procedures, data verification, data storage | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| (physical and electronic) protocols. | exploration work. | |
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | ||
| exploration work. | ||
| Location of | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| data points | drill holes (collar and down‐hole surveys), | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| trenches, mine workings and other locations | exploration work. |
|
| used in Mineral Resource estimation. | ||
| Specification of the grid system used. | The grid system used at the Mt Alexander project is GDA94 (MGA), | |
| zone 51. | ||
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | ||
| exploration work. | ||
| Data spacing | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| and | Results. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| distribution | exploration work. | |
| Whether the data spacing and distribution is | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
|
| sufficient to establish the degree of geological | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
|
| and grade continuity appropriate for the | exploration work. |
|
| Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation | ||
| procedure(s) and classifications applied. | ||
| Whether sample compositing has been applied. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
|
| not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | ||
| exploration work. |
3
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Orientation of | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| data in relation | unbiased sampling of possible structures and | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| to geological | the extent to which this is known, considering | exploration work. |
| structure | the deposit type. | |
| If the relationship between the drilling | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| orientation and the orientation of key | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| mineralised structures is considered to have | exploration work. | |
| introduced a sampling bias, this should be | ||
| assessed and reported if material. | ||
| Sample | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| security | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| exploration work. | ||
| Audits or | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| reviews | techniques and data. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| exploration work. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | Type, name/reference number, location and | The Mt Alexander Project is comprised of two granted Exploration |
| Tenement and | ownership including agreements or material | Licences (E29/638 and E29/548). Tenement E29/638 will be a Joint |
| Land Status | issues with third parties including joint | Venture between St George (75% interest) and Western Areas (25% |
| ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, | interest). Both tenements are subject to a royalty in favour of a third |
|
| native title interests, historical sites, wilderness | party that is outlined in the ASX Release dated 17 December 2015 |
|
| or national park and environmental settings. | (as regards E29/638) and the ASX release dated 18 September 2015 | |
| (as regards E29/548). | ||
| The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
No environmentally sensitive sites have been identified on the tenements. A registered Heritage site known as Willsmore 1 (DAA identification 3087) straddles tenements E29/548 and E29/638. |
|
| The newly acquired tenement E29/638, as well as E29/548, are in | ||
| good standing and no known impediments exist. | ||
| Exploration | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration | Exploration on tenement E29/638 has been largely for komatiite‐ |
| Done by Other | by other parties. | hosted nickel sulphides both in the Mt Alexander Greenstone Belt, |
| Parties | and at the Cathedrals Prospect in the northern section of the | |
| tenement. | ||
| The target lithological unit in the Mt Alexander Greenstone belt has | ||
| been the Central Ultramafic Unit, which has been explored by a | ||
| number of parties, most recently by Nickel West. | ||
| High grade nickel‐copper sulphides were discovered at the Mt | ||
| Alexander Project in 2008. Drilling was completed to test co‐incident | ||
| electromagnetic (EM) and magnetic anomalies associated with | ||
| nickel‐PGE enriched gossans. The drilling identified high grade Ni‐Cu | ||
| mineralisation and the discovery was named the Cathedrals | ||
| Prospect. The tenement remains underexplored. | ||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of | The Mt Alexander Project is at the northern end of a western |
| mineralisation | bifurcation of the Mt Ida Greenstones. The greenstones are bound | |
| to the west by the Ida Fault, a significant Craton‐scale structure that | ||
| marks the boundary between the Kalgoorlie Terrane (and Eastern | ||
| Goldfields Superterrane) to the east and the Youanmi Terrane to the | ||
| west. | ||
| The Mt Alexander Project is prospective for further high‐grade | ||
| komatiite‐hosted nickel‐copper‐PGE mineralisation and also |
||
| precious metal mineralisation (i.e. orogenic gold) that is typified | ||
| elsewhere in the Yilgarn Craton. |
4
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Drill hole | A summary of all information material to the | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| information | understanding of the exploration results | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| including tabulation of the following |
exploration work. | |
| information for all Material drill holes: | Table 1 to this JORC Section contains drill hole information on the | |
| • Easting and northing of the drill hole collar | historic drilling that is discussed in this ASX Release. This historic | |
| •Elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation | drilling was reported by Western Areas Limited in its ASX Release | |
| above sea level in meters) of the drill hole collar • Dip and azimuth of the hole |
dated 2 April 2008_‘Assays Confirm High Grade Nickel/Copper/PGE_ Discovery at Mt Alexander Joint Venture’. |
|
| • Down hole length and interception depth | ||
| • Hole length | ||
| Data | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| aggregation | averaging techniques, maximum and/or |
not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| methods | minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of | exploration work. |
| high grades) and cut‐off grades are usually | ||
| Material and should be stated. | ||
| Where aggregated intercepts incorporate short | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| lengths of high grade results and longer | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| lengths of low grade results, the procedure | exploration work. | |
| used for such aggregation should be stated and | ||
| some typical examples of such aggregations | ||
| should be shown in detail. | ||
| The assumptions used for any reporting of | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does | |
| metal equivalent values should be clearly | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling | |
| stated. | exploration work. | |
| Relationship | These relationships are particularly important | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| between | in the reporting of exploration results. | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, |
exploration work. Historical assay intersections are reported as down hole lengths. The relationship of down hole width to true width will be reviewed by St George upon assessment of the newly acquired technical data. |
| there should be a clear statement to this effect | ||
| (e.g. down hole length, true width not known). | ||
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) | Relevant scaled and oriented maps are included in the body of the |
| and tabulations of intercepts should be | ASX Release. | |
| included for any significant discovery being | ||
| reported. These should include, but not be | ||
| limited to a plane view of drill hole collar | ||
| locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | Where comprehensive reporting of all |
This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| Reporting | Exploration Results is not practical, |
not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| representative reporting of both low and high | exploration work. Comprehensive reporting of all exploration results | |
| grades and/or widths should be practiced to | is not required for the scope of this ASX release and will be | |
| avoid misleading reporting Exploration Results. | tabulated upon detailed evaluation of the newly acquired project | |
| database. | ||
| Other | Other exploration data, if meaningful and | This ASX Release refers only to historic exploration drilling and does |
| substantive | material, should be reported including (but not | not report any new drilling results, assay or other sampling |
| exploration | limited to): geological observation; geophysical | exploration work. |
| data | survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk | |
| samples – size and method of treatment; | ||
| metallurgical test results; bulk density, |
||
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock |
||
| characteristics; potential deleterious or |
||
| contaminating substances. |
5
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Further Work | The nature and scale of planned further work | Further exploration on E29/638 will be planned once all newly |
| (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth | acquired technical data has been reviewed. Details of further work | |
| extensions or large – scale step – out drilling). | at the tenement will be announced after completion of the | |
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | acquisition, scheduled for 28 January 2016, occurs. | |
| possible extensions, including the main |
||
| geological interpretations and future drilling | ||
| areas, provided this information is not | ||
| commercially sensitive. |
| HOLE ID | EASTING | NORTHING | DIP | AZM | DEPTH | FROM | TO | WIDTH | Ni | Cu | Total PGEs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (m) | (m) | (deg) | (deg) | (m) | (m) | (m) | (m) | (%) | (%) | (g/t) | |
| MAD012 | 233885 | 6806995 | ‐70 | 170 | 111.5 | 81.5 | 95.5 | 14 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| incl. | 91.4 | 95.4 | 4 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 3.9 | |||||
| MAD013 | 233805 | 6806955 | ‐70 | 170 | 93.3 | 56.3 | 59.3 | 3 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| incl. | 57.6 | 59 | 1.4 | 7.1 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
Table 1 to 2012 JORC Section – Significant intersections at the Cathedrals Prospect within E29/638
6