BHP Group Limited — Annual Report 2016

Aug 15, 2016

==> picture [86 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

BHP Billiton Limited BHP Billiton Plc 171 Collins Street Neathouse Place Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia London SW1V 1LH UK GPO BOX 86 Tel +44 20 7802 4000 Melbourne Victoria 3001 Australia Fax + 44 20 7802 4111 Tel +61 1300 55 47 57 Fax +61 3 9609 3015 bhpbilliton.com bhpbilliton.com

16 August 2016

To: Australian Securities Exchange New York Stock Exchange

RESULTS PRESENTATION YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016

Attached are the presentation slides for a presentation that will be given by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer shortly.

The Webcast for this presentation can be accessed at:

• http://edge.media server.com/m/p/fga4tpfi

Further information on BHP Billiton can be found at www.bhpbilliton.com.

==> picture [98 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Rachel Agnew Company Secretary

BHP Billiton Limited ABN 49 004 028 077 BHP Billiton Plc Registration number 3196209 Registered in Australia Registered in England and Wales Registered Office: Level 18, 171 Collins Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Registered Office: Neathouse Place, London SW1V 1LH United Kingdom

The BHP Billiton Group is headquartered in Australia

==> picture [114 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results Year ended 30 June 2016

Disclaimer

Forward-looking statements

This presentation contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding: trends in commodity prices and currency exchange rates; demand for commodities; plans, strategies and objectives of management; closure or divestment of certain operations or facilities (including associated costs); anticipated production or construction commencement dates; capital costs and scheduling; operating costs and shortages of materials and skilled employees; anticipated productive lives of projects, mines and facilities; provisions and contingent liabilities; tax and regulatory developments.

Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as ‘intend’, ‘aim’, ‘project’, ‘anticipate’, ‘estimate’, ‘plan’, ‘believe’, ‘expect’, ‘may’, ‘should’, ‘will’, ‘continue’, ‘annualised’ or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations concerning the results of operations or financial condition, or provide other forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are not guarantees or predictions of future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, and which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements contained in this presentation. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

For example, future revenues from our operations, projects or mines described in this presentation will be based, in part, upon the market price of the minerals, metals or petroleum produced, which may vary significantly from current levels. These variations, if materially adverse, may affect the timing or the feasibility of the development of a particular project, the expansion of certain facilities or mines, or the continuation of existing operations.

Other factors that may affect the actual construction or production commencement dates, costs or production output and anticipated lives of operations, mines or facilities include our ability to profitably produce and transport the minerals, petroleum and/or metals extracted to applicable markets; the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on the market prices of the minerals, petroleum or metals we produce; activities of government authorities in some of the countries where we are exploring or developing these projects, facilities or mines, including increases in taxes, changes in environmental and other regulations and political uncertainty; labour unrest; and other factors identified in the risk factors discussed in BHP Billiton’s filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (including in Annual Reports on Form 20-F) which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Except as required by applicable regulations or by law, the Group does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events. Past performance cannot be relied on as a guide to future performance.

Non-IFRS financial information

BHP Billiton results are reported under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) including Underlying EBIT and Underlying EBITDA which are used to measure segment performance. This release may also include certain non-IFRS and other financial measures including Adjusted effective tax rate, Free cash flow, Gearing ratio, Net debt, Net operating assets, Underlying attributable profit, Underlying basic (loss)/earnings per share, Underlying EBIT margin and Underlying EBITDA margin. These measures are used internally by management to assess the performance of our business, make decisions on the allocation of our resources and assess operational management. Non-IFRS and other financial measures have not been subject to audit or review and should not be considered as an indication of or alternative to an IFRS measure of profitability, financial performance or liquidity.

Presentation of data

Unless specified otherwise: all data is presented on a continuing operations basis to exclude the contribution from assets that were demerged with South32; references to Underlying EBITDA margin exclude third party trading activities; data from subsidiaries is shown on a 100 per cent basis and data from equity accounted investments and other operations is shown on a proportionate consolidation basis. Queensland Coal comprises the BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) asset, jointly operated with Mitsubishi, and the BHP Billiton Mitsui Coal (BMC) asset, operated by BHP Billiton. Numbers presented may not add up precisely to the totals provided due to rounding.

No offer of securities

Nothing in this presentation should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell BHP Billiton securities in any jurisdiction, or be treated or relied upon as a recommendation or advice by BHP Billiton.

Reliance on third party information

The views expressed in this presentation contain information that has been derived from publicly available sources that have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information. This presentation should not be relied upon as a recommendation or forecast by BHP Billiton.

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results 16 August 2016

2

==> picture [114 x 75] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

EscondidaSpence
----- End of picture text -----

Financial results Year ended 30 June 2016 Andrew Mackenzie Chief Executive Officer

==> picture [883 x 232] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

South Walker Creek
----- End of picture text -----

Solid performance in a challenging year

Safety Committed to addressing consequences of the Samarco tailings dam failure Zero fatalities at BHP Billiton operated sites Volume Record WAIO and metallurgical coal production; strong conventional petroleum volumes Offset by anticipated Escondida grade decline and deferral of Onshore US activity Cost Unit cash costs across the Group down 16% from FY15[1] Productivity gains of US$437 million (gains of US$2.0 billion excluding Escondida grade decline) Financial Underlying EBITDA of US$12.3 billion; Underlying EBITDA margin of 41% results Underlying attributable profit of US$1.2 billion; Attributable loss of US$6.4 billion Cash Net operating cash flow of US$10.6 billion flow Free cash flow[2] of US$3.4 billion Balance Net debt of US$26.1 billion sheet Liquidity of US$16.3 billion and long-dated maturity profile Dividend Final dividend of US$0.14 per share Total FY16 dividend determined of US$0.30 per share

1. Presented on a continuing operations basis excluding BHP Billiton's share of volumes from equity accounted investments; operating cost per copper equivalent tonne calculated using FY16 realised prices. 2. Free cash flow: net operating cash flows less net investing cash flows.

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

4

Committed to Samarco

• Rehabilitation progressing well

• Germano and Santarem Dams reinforcement works continue

• 90% of the 41 work programs initiated

• community resettlement ongoing

• Foundation established

• Framework Agreement is the appropriate long-term response

• Expect findings of the external investigation into the cause of the dam failure to be released shortly

• Preparation for the wet season a priority

• Technical studies indicate Samarco can restart safely

• completion of stabilisation work, range of permits and community support required

Samarco infrastructure

==> picture [194 x 124] intentionally omitted <==

Santarem Dam, November 2015

Environment

==> picture [194 x 124] intentionally omitted <==

Barra Longa, November 2015

==> picture [194 x 124] intentionally omitted <==

Rebuilt Santarem Dam, March 2016

==> picture [194 x 124] intentionally omitted <==

River stabilisation at Barra Longa, May 2016

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results 16 August 2016

5

Safety is paramount

• The health and safety of our people and communities always come first

• tragically 19 lives were lost following the Samarco dam failure

• Strong safety performance at BHP Billiton operated sites

Total Recordable Injury Frequency at operated sites (number of recordable injuries per million hours worked[1] )

10

8

• zero fatalities in FY16

• TRIF of 4.3 per million hours worked

• 20% reduction in high potential safety events

• better investigation quality and learning from past events

6 4 2 0 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

1. FY06 to FY14 presented on a total operations basis.

Financial results

16 August 2016

6

==> picture [114 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results Year ended 30 June 2016 Peter Beaven Chief Financial Officer

==> picture [883 x 232] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Shenzi
----- End of picture text -----

Asset quality and operating performance drive margins

• Underlying EBITDA of US$12.3 billion

• Underlying EBITDA margin of 41%

• 16% reduction in unit costs

• Underlying EBIT of US$3.5 billion

• Underlying attributable profit of US$1.2 billion

• Attributable loss of US$6.4 billion

• US$7.7 billion of exceptional items (after tax)

Leading margins through the cycle

==> picture [161 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

(Underlying EBITDA margin [1] , %)
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [426 x 217] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

60
35
10
FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
BHP Billiton Peer group range
----- End of picture text -----

Petroleum

240 MMboe Conventional cost: US$ 8.53/boe EBITDA: US$3.7 billion EBITDA margin: 54%

Copper Iron Ore 1,580 kt 227 Mt Cost: US$1.20/lb Cost[2] : US$15/t EBITDA: US$2.6 billion EBITDA[2] : US$5.5 billion EBITDA margin: 35% EBITDA[2] margin: 53%

==> picture [198 x 76] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Metallurgical Coal
43 Mt
Cost [2] : US$55/t
EBITDA [2] : US$584 million
EBITDA [2] margin: 17%
----- End of picture text -----

1. BHP Billiton data for FY06 to FY14 presented on a total operations basis. Peer group comprises Anglo American, Rio Tinto and Vale.

2. Unit cost, EBITDA and EBITDA margins refer to Western Australia Iron Ore and Queensland Coal.

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

8

Group EBITDA waterfall

Underlying EBITDA variance

==> picture [875 x 328] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

(US$ billion)
24
21.9 External (US$9.9 billion) Controllable US$0.3 billion
16
0.2
1.1 1.4 0.2 12.3
12.0
(0.3)
(0.3)
(0.4)
(10.7)
(0.8)
8
0
FY15 Price¹ Foreign Inflation Sub-total Growth Productivity Controllable Fuel & Non-cash² Other³ FY16
exchange volumes volumes cash costs energy
----- End of picture text -----

1. Net of price-linked costs.

2. Non-cash includes deferred stripping depletion.

3. Other includes ceased and sold operations, asset sales, one-off items and other items (including profit/loss from equity accounted investments).

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

9

Financial impact of Samarco dam failure

• Investment in Samarco written down to US$nil at 31 December 2015

• US$1.2 billion provision at 30 June 2016 reflects uncertainty around potential restart

• equivalent to 50% share of current estimate of Samarco’s funding obligations under terms of Framework Agreement

• US$134 million funding support to Foundation’s reparatory and compensatory programs will be offset against provision

• Direct costs incurred by BHP Billiton[1] of US$70 million

• Samarco financial support made available for remediation and stabilisation work and to support operations

• short-term funding facility of US$116 million for restart and working capital will be released only as required

• safe restart is an important priority, along with the restructure of Samarco’s debt

Equity accounted investment in Samarco

Income statement impacts		H1	H2
(US$ million)		FY16	FY16	FY16
Share of loss relating to dam failure &
impairment of carrying value of the		(1,180)	-	(1,180)
investment in Samarco
BHP Billiton Brasil provision		-	(1,200)	(1,200)
Costs incurred directly by BHP Billiton1 in relation to the Samarco dam failure		(8)	(62)	(70)
Total pre-tax Samarco dam failure exceptional expense		(1,188)	(1,262)	(2,450)
Income tax benefit / (expense)		330	(77)	253
Total Samarco dam failure exceptional expense		(858)	(1,339)	(2,197)
Balance sheet impacts		H1	H2
(US$ million)	FY15	FY16	FY16	FY16
Investment in Samarco	1,0442	-	-	-
BHP Billiton Brasil provision	-	-	(1,200)	(1,200)

1. Includes BHP Billiton Brasil and other BHP Billiton entities.

2. Excludes US$136 million representing share of operating profit prior to the dam failure on 5 November 2015.

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

10

Free cash flow provides optionality

• Free cash flow of US$3.4 billion

• net operating cash flow of US$10.6 billion

• capital and exploration expenditure of US$7.7 billion[1]

• working capital release of US$0.2 billion

• ~40% reduction in Group overheads over 4 years[2]

• Balance sheet is strong

Capital and exploration expenditure (cash basis)

(US$ billion)

==> picture [432 x 104] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

24
12
0
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17e
----- End of picture text -----

• net debt of US$26.1 billion

• average debt maturity of 9 years

• liquidity of US$16.3 billion

• ‘A’ credit rating maintained[3]

• Cash basis. Capital and exploration expenditure of US$6.4 billion on a BHP Billiton share basis.

• Excludes Samarco and Group capital expenditure.

• Current credit rating of A (S&P) and A3 (Moody’s). We manage to a solid A credit rating through the cycle.

• Includes purchase of shares by Employee Share Ownership Plan Trusts.

• Non-cash movements include non-cash foreign exchange variance due to the revaluations of local currency denominated debt offset by non-cash fair value adjustment on hedged debt.

Financial results

Movements in net debt

(US$ billion)

==> picture [441 x 222] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

28
3.3 0.0
25.9 1.4 26.1
24.4 (0.6) 0.9 0.1
24
(2.2)
(1.2)
20 4 5 4 5
FY15 Free cash flow Dividends paid Other movements Non-cash movement H1 FY16 Free cash flow Dividends paid Other movements Non-cash movement FY16
----- End of picture text -----

16 August 2016

11

Disciplined capital allocation

• Our Capital Allocation Framework balances value creation, shareholder returns and balance sheet strength

• ‘A’ credit rating maintained[1]

• total dividends paid of US$4.1 billion

• growth capital and exploration expenditure of US$5.7 billion

• Board will consider additional cash returns over minimum 50% payout at every reporting period

• US$0.30 per share dividend determined in FY16

– H1: US$0.16 per share (US$0.04 plus US$0.12 additional)

• H2: US$0.14 per share (US$0.08 plus US$0.06 additional)

Capital allocation in FY16

(US$ billion)

==> picture [500 x 318] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

H1 H2 FY16
5.3 5.3 10.6 Net operating cash flow
1.0 1.0 2.0 maintenance capital
Solid A credit rating through the cycle balance sheet
3.3 [²] 0.2 3.5 minimum dividend paid
1.0 4.1 5.1 Excess cash
(2.3) 1.3 (0.9) balance sheet
3.4 2.3 5.7 organic growth investment
- 0.6 0.6 additional dividend amount
- - -
buy-backs
(0.1) (0.2) (0.3) acquisitions/(divestments)
and value
Maximise returns
----- End of picture text -----

1. Current credit rating of A (S&P) and A3 (Moodys). We manage to a solid A credit rating through the cycle.

2. Final dividend determined under progressive dividend policy in August 2015.

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

12

Escondida

Financial results Year ended 30 June 2016 Andrew Mackenzie Chief Executive Officer

==> picture [883 x 232] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Eastern Ridge
----- End of picture text -----

Well placed for the conditions we expect

• Near-term is difficult

Commodity market outlook to 2025

• well-supplied markets across our commodity suite

• ineffective monetary policy, political uncertainty, populist rejection of free trade suppressing business confidence

• Fundamentals to return as markets rebalance over the medium term

• Robust longer-term demand outlook

• China’s industrial output and fixed investment solid

• urbanisation, industrialisation and freer trade will lift demand from other emerging markets

==> picture [364 x 295] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Petroleum [1]
Copper
Potash
Energy coal
Iron ore
Metallurgical
coal
Supply opportunity by 2025 (versus 2015)
----- End of picture text -----

Time until expected market rebalance

Source: Wood Mackenzie, BHP Billiton analysis. 1. Includes crude and US gas.

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

14

Focused portfolio and simplified operating model

• Optimal portfolio after divestments and demerger

• well-capitalised, low-cost, long-life assets with expansion options

• diversified across the right commodities

• favourable geographic concentration

• New operating model accelerates productivity gains

• assets focused solely on safety, volume and cost

• globally integrated functions co-located with the assets

• centres of excellence for maintenance, projects and geoscience

• new structure has lowered overheads through fewer layers and increased spans of control

Tier 1 portfolio

==> picture [414 x 302] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

(FY16 Underlying EBITDA margin, %)
80
Note: Bubble size
represents FY16
copper equivalent
Iron ore
Petroleum production [1]
60
40
Copper
Energy coal
20
Metallurgical
coal
0
1 [st] 2 [nd] 3 [rd] 4 [th]
Cost curve position [2] (quartile)
----- End of picture text -----

Source: AME; Wood Mackenzie; BHP Billiton analysis.

1. Copper equivalent production based on FY16 realised prices.

2. Based on weighted average equity share of production using quality-adjusted operating cost curves versus contestable demand in the markets in which our assets operate.

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

15

Broad suite of opportunities offers significant upside

We have made significant progress to capture valuation upside and improve returns

Productivity On track to deliver US$2.2 billion of gains over two years to end FY17 Absorbed US$1.6 billion impact of grade decline at Escondida in FY16 Latent Latent capacity options equate to >10% of current production at a capital cost of ~US$1.5 billion Los Colorados Extension approved; Spence Recovery Optimisation ramping up; new Jimblebar capacity capacity by December; Queensland Coal capacity creep; Olympic Dam on track for 230 ktpa by 2021 Shale Onshore US free cash flow positive in FY17 at consensus prices Launched hedging program to unlock resource in the Haynesville Mad Dog 2 investment decision expected in the next 12 months Projects Spence Growth Option due for Board review in H2 CY17; Olympic Dam Brownfield Expansion (BFX) now at concept study phase Exploration Counter cyclical investment to accelerate oil and copper exploration Exploration wells currently drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and Trinidad & Tobago Technology Ongoing investment in technology to lower costs and unlock resources IROC for Coal approved; Olympic Dam heap leach trials moved to next stage

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

16

Momentum builds into the new financial year

Steady volumes…

• FY17 copper equivalent volume growth of up to 4% (ex-Onshore US)

Lowest unit operating costs in a decade expected in FY17 (Mt, operating cost per copper equivalent tonne)

• Onshore US will respond to market conditions

…lower costs…

• productivity gains of US$1.8 billion expected in FY17

• unit costs expected to reduce by 12%[1]

…and higher capital productivity…

• FY17 capital and exploration expenditure of US$5.4 billion[2]

• biased to latent capacity and low-cost growth

…will drive free cash flow and lower debt

• free cash flow of over US$7 billion in FY17 at spot prices[3]

• FY16 net debt of US$26.1 billion expected to be the peak this cycle

==> picture [317 x 211] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [345 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Volumes¹ Operating cost per copper equivalent tonne¹
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17e
----- End of picture text -----

1. Presented on a continuing operations basis excluding BHP Billiton's share of volumes from equity accounted investments; operating cost per copper equivalent tonne calculated using FY16 realised prices.

2. On a cash basis. Capital and exploration expenditure of US$5.0 billion on BHP Billiton share basis.

3. Spot prices at 8 August 2016.

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

17

Positioned to grow value and returns

The right commodities…

• optimal diversification with petroleum and copper markets expected to rebalance first

We have opportunities to significantly increase returns (Return on Capital Employed[3] at consensus prices, nominal)

…the right assets…

• optimal portfolio of well-capitalised, low-cost, long life assets

…the right structure…

• 12 operated assets, 4 commodities, 3 operating groups

…to maximise free cash flow[1]

• free cash flow of over US$7 billion in FY17 at spot prices[2]

The right capital allocation framework…

• balances value creation, shareholder returns and balance sheet strength

…to drive value and returns

• strong progress on suite of opportunities to grow value and improve ROIC

(Years)

1. Free cash flow: operating cash flow less capital expenditure and exploration.

2. Spot prices at 8 August 2016.

3. Assumes all latent capacity and growth options (including Onshore US) proceed.

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

18

==> picture [477 x 269] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [114 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix

BHP Billiton guidance

Group	FY17e	FY18e
Capital and exploration expenditure (US$bn)	5.4	6.2 Cash basis.
Including:
Maintenance	2.0
Exploration	0.8	0.8 US$700m Petroleum and US$60m Copper exploration program planned for FY17.
Petroleum	FY17e
Total petroleum production (MMboe)	200 - 210
Onshore US
Capital expenditure (US$bn)	0.6	Development activity tailored to market conditions.
Production (MMboe)	77 - 83	We continue to balance near-term cash flow performance and long-term value maximisation.
Conventional Petroleum
Capital expenditure (US$bn)	0.8	Focused on life extension projects at Bass Strait and North West Shelf.
Production (MMboe)	123 - 127	35 day maintenance shutdown at Atlantis in Q1 FY16, deferral of infill drilling in the Gulf of Mexico for value and natural field decline.
Unit cost (US$/barrel)	10	Excludes inventory movements, freight, and third party and exploration expense.
Exploration (US$bn)	0.7	Focused on Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean and the Northern beagle sub-basin.

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results 16 August 2016

21

BHP Billiton guidance (continued)

Copper	FY17e
Total copper production (Mt)	1.66	Guidance for Escondida at 1.07 Mt. Pampa Norte production is expected to increase. Olympic Dam production guidance to remain unchanged.
		Guidance for Antamina production to decrease to 130 kt as planned mining sequence moves through lower a copper grade zone.
Escondida
Production (Mt, 100% basis)	1.07	Enabled by the commissioning of the Escondida Water Supply project and the ramp up of the Los Colorados Extension.
Unit cash costs (US$/lb)	1.00	Excludes freight and treatment and refining charges. Net of by-product credits. Based on an exchange rate of USD/CLP 698.
Iron Ore	FY17e
Total iron ore production (Mt)	228 - 237	Excludes production from Samarco.
Western Australia Iron Ore
Production (Mt, 100% basis)	265 - 275
Unit cash costs (US$/t)	14	Excludes freight and royalties; based on an exchange rate of AUD/USD 0.71.
Sustaining capital expenditure (US$/t)	4	Long term average; +/- 50% in any given year.
Coal	FY17e
Total metallurgical coal production (Mt)	44
Total energy coal production (Mt)	30	The divestment of Navajo Coal to Navajo Transitional Energy Company was completed on 29 July 2016.
Queensland Coal
Production (Mt)	44
Unit cash costs (US$/t)	52	Excludes freight and royalties; based on an exchange rate of AUD/USD 0.71.
Sustaining capital expenditure (US$/t)	6	Long term average; +/- 50% in any given year.
NSW Energy Coal
Production (Mt)	19
Unit cash costs (US$/t)	38	Excludes freight and royalties; based on an exchange rate of AUD/USD 0.71.
Sustaining capital expenditure (US$/t)	4	Long term average; +/- 50% in any given year.

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

22

Key Underlying EBITDA sensitivities

Approximate impact1 on FY17 Underlying EBITDA of changes of:	US$ million
US$1/t on iron ore price2	217
US$1/bbl on oil price3	79
US¢10/MMbtu on US gas price	26
US$1/t on metallurgical coal price	42
US¢1/lb on copper price2	34
US$1/t on energy coal price2	18
US¢1/lb on nickel price	2
AUD (US¢1/A$) operations4	78

1. Assumes total volume exposed to price; determined on the basis of BHP Billiton’s existing portfolio.

2. Excludes impact of equity accounted investments.

3. Excludes impact of change in input costs across the Group.

4. Based on average exchange rate for the period.

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

23

Petroleum EBITDA waterfall

==> picture [873 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Underlying EBITDA variance
(US$ billion)
8.0
External (US$3.7 billion) Controllable US$0.2 billion
7.2
0.7
4.0
3.7
3.5
(3.6) (0.1) (0.0) (0.0) 0.0 (0.1)
(0.4)
0.0
FY15 Price¹ Foreign Inflation Sub-total Growth Controllable Fuel & Non-cash² Other³ FY16
exchange volumes cash costs energy
----- End of picture text -----

1. Net of price-linked costs.

2. Non-cash includes change in deferred stripping depletion.

3. Other includes ceased and sold operations, asset sales, one-off items and other items (including profit/loss from equity accounted investments).

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

24

Copper EBITDA waterfall

==> picture [873 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Underlying EBITDA variance
(US$ billion)
6.0
External (US$2.0 billion) Controllable (US$0.6 billion)
5.2
0.3
3.2
0.0
3.0
(2.2) (0.1) 0.2 2.6
0.2
0.0
(0.9)
(0.1)
0.0
FY15 Price¹ Foreign Inflation Sub-total Growth Productivity Controllable Fuel & Non-cash² Other³ FY16
exchange volumes volumes cash costs energy
----- End of picture text -----

1. Net of price-linked costs.

2. Non-cash includes change in deferred stripping depletion.

3. Other includes asset sales, one-off items and other items (including profit/loss from equity accounted investments).

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

25

Iron Ore EBITDA waterfall

==> picture [875 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Underlying EBITDA variance
(US$ billion)
10.0
External (US$3.4 billion) Controllable US$0.4 billion
8.6
0.1
0.3 5.6
0.3
5.2 0.1
0.0 (0.0) (0.1)
5.0
(3.6) (0.1)
0.0
FY15 Price¹ Foreign Inflation Sub-total Growth Productivity Controllable Fuel & Non-cash² Other³ FY16
exchange volumes volumes cash costs energy
----- End of picture text -----

1. Net of price-linked costs.

2. Non-cash includes change in deferred stripping depletion.

3. Other includes ceased and sold operations, asset sales, one-off items and other items (including profit/loss from equity accounted investments).

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

26

Coal EBITDA waterfall

==> picture [873 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Underlying EBITDA variance
(US$ billion)
1.6
External (US$0.6 billion) Controllable US$0.0 billion
1.2
0.1
0.2 0.0
0.8
0.4 0.0
0.6 0.0
0.6
(0.1)
(0.3)
(0.9)
0.0
FY15 Price¹ Foreign Inflation Sub-total Growth Productivity Controllable Fuel & Non-cash² Other³ FY16
exchange volumes volumes cash costs energy
----- End of picture text -----

1. Net of price-linked costs.

2. Non-cash includes change in deferred stripping depletion.

3. Other includes ceased and sold operations, asset sales, one-off items and other items (including profit/loss from equity accounted investments).

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

27

Other items affecting profitability

==> picture [862 x 304] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Other items
(US$ billion) Underlying
Underlying EBITDA attributable profit [1] Exceptional items [1]
0.0
(0.3) (0.2) (0.2) (0.2) (0.2)
(0.6)
(2.0)
(2.2)
(4.0)
(4.9)
(6.0)
Redundancies and Royalty and Redundancies and Minor impairments Royalty and Global taxation Samarco dam failure Impairment of
closure costs taxation matters closure costs taxation matters matters Onshore US
----- End of picture text -----

1. Post tax consequences.

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

28

Debt maturity profile

Debt balances[1]

(US$ billion[2] )

8

==> picture [872 x 254] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

6
4
2
0
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 Post FY28
US$ Euro Sterling A$ C$
Bonds [3] Bonds [3] Bonds [3] Bonds Bonds Subsidiaries
% of portfolio 46% 30% 11% 5% 2% 6%
Capital markets 94% Asset financing 6%
----- End of picture text -----

1. All debt balances are represented in notional US$ values and based on financial years. As at 30 June 2016.

2. Subsidiary debt is presented in accordance with IFRS 10 and IFRS 11.

3. Includes hybrid bonds (18% of portfolio: 9% in US$, 6% in Euro, 3% in Sterling).

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

29

We remain positive on long-term copper fundamentals

Short-term overcapacity in copper remains persistent

• Subdued demand with slower than expected growth in China and recession in key non-Asian emerging economies

• Increased supply from new and expanded operations with more growth expected near term

Long-term fundamentals are sound

• Demand growth will continue as China transitions to a consumer-driven economy, and copper-intensive renewable energy capacity and electric vehicles grow rapidly

• Emerging markets will recover and converge to their natural intensity curves

• Grade decline and mine depletions will require investment in new supply

Global demand slow recently, but long run trend is still positive (Refined copper demand[1] , Mt)

==> picture [22 x 9] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

22.5
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [430 x 141] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

CAGR 1.5%
22.0
21.5
21.0
CY14 China RoW CIS/ CY15 CY15 CY30e
S America
----- End of picture text -----

Continued global ore grade decline expected (Copper grades[2] , %)

==> picture [420 x 112] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

1.5
1.3
1.1
0.9
CY00 CY05 CY10 CY15 CY20e CY25e
----- End of picture text -----

Source: Wood Mackenzie.

1. The two upper panels are not set to the same scale.

2. Based on average grade weighted by paid copper.

Financial results

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

16 August 2016

30

Oil and US gas markets expected to rebalance

Outlook remains healthy

• Fundamentals tightening, as healthy demand growth intersects with slower global production growth due to falling production in the US

• Rate of inventory drawdown will impact price recovery - OPEC and US production remain key watch points

• Higher prices will be required to induce the new supply needed to offset natural field decline and meet growing demand

Oil mass balance: global

(Inventory change, MMbbl/d)

==> picture [412 x 126] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

2.0
1.0
0.0
(1.0)
CY12 CY13 CY14 CY15 CY16e CY17e
----- End of picture text -----

Near-term US natural gas prices driven by storage and weather; long-term market supported by robust demand growth

• Mild winter, industry-wide productivity gains and resilient supply resulted in record inventory levels

Gas storage: US Lower 48 (tcf)

==> picture [16 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

6.0
----- End of picture text -----

• Inventories forecast to return to average levels by end CY16 on strong demand growth and declining production

• While investment in new supply sources will be required, the abundant lower-cost supply will moderate price inflation

Source: BHP Billiton analysis; US Energy Information Administration (August 2016).

Financial results

==> picture [412 x 154] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

3.0
0.0
Jan 15 Apr 15 Jul 15 Oct 15 Jan 16 Apr 16 Jul 16 Oct 16
5 year min/max 5 year average
Gas stock Storage forecast
----- End of picture text -----

16 August 2016

31

Iron ore demand outlook remains modest

Chinese and global steel growth to slow

• Global steel production is likely to grow modestly in the future

• China’s steel demand growth to become more cyclical as it moves past the inflection point on its intensity curve

• As China slows, global steel demand growth will mostly come from emerging economies, primarily India and Southeast Asia

Low-cost iron ore to continue to displace higher cost supply

• Supply growth will continue to outweigh demand growth in coming years

• Lower costs through productivity is likely to remain a long-term feature

• Pilbara production expected to remain highly cost competitive

Source: Worldsteel; BHP Billiton analysis.

1. Other emerging markets: including developing Asian countries, Middle East, Africa and Latin America.

==> picture [408 x 170] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Global steel production break-down
(Regional split %) (CAGR %)
100 10
50 5
0 0
2005 2010 2015 2020e 2025e 2030e
Developed China Other EMs¹ CAGR (RHS)
----- End of picture text -----

Seaborne iron ore exports by region (% of global market)

==> picture [405 x 139] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

60
40
20
0
Australia Brazil Others
2010 2015 2030e
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

32

Supply opportunity

Metallurgical coal outlook supported by growing demand for high-quality product

Demand improvement to be moderate, supply slowly adjusting

• Cost curve has flattened

• Lower prices are leading to closures and reduced investment

The world continues to require steel and metallurgical coal is essential for pig iron production

• China expected to continue to import seaborne metallurgical coal

• demand supported by coastal market access and requirement for consistent, quality product in larger blast furnaces

• encouraging signs following domestic coal supply reforms

• Robust outlook underpinned by scarcity of high-quality resources and demand growth in emerging economies

• particularly in India where we expect strong steel production growth

Source: Wood Mackenzie; Worldsteel; BHP Billiton analysis.

1. Includes productivity improvements.

2. Emerging Asia includes India, ASEAN and other South Asia. Excludes China, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea.

Seaborne metallurgical coal supply and demand (Bt)

==> picture [378 x 95] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [418 x 218] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

2015 2020e 2025e 2030e 2035e
Existing supply [1] Demand range Demand
Gap to close in emerging market steel stock
(finished steel per capita, t)
15
10
5
0
2000 2015 2020e 2025e 2030e 2035e
Emerging Asia² China US Europe
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [73 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Financial results

16 August 2016

33

Energy coal expected to remain an important part of the global energy complex

Markets expected to remain oversupplied in the near term

• China’s demand for imports is likely to fall further as domestic overcapacity persists, however coal supply reforms encouraging

• More supply rationalisation is required to balance the market

Coal’s share of the fuel mix will decline but total volume will grow due to cost competitiveness in Asia

• Absolute demand expected to increase by 10-15% by the mid-2020s, despite a declining share in the global electricity generation fuel mix

• India and South East Asia have 26% of the world’s population, but still account for only 13% of global electricity generation

• low-cost energy coal is expected to be a preferred fuel source

Source: Wood Mackenzie; IEA; BHP Billiton analysis.

1. Includes productivity improvements.

2. Based on IEA data from WEO2015_AnnexA © OECD/IEA, www.iea.org/statistics. Licence: www.iea.org/t&c; as modified by BHP Billiton.

Financial results

Additional seaborne supply required to meet expected demand (Bt)

==> picture [376 x 95] intentionally omitted <==

Supply opportunity

==> picture [427 x 274] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

2015 2020e 2025e 2030e 2035e
Existing supply [1] Demand range Demand
Global electricity fuel mix [2] Energy coal use in electricity [2]
(PWh) (coal share, %) (PWh)
50 50 15
10
25 25
5
0 0 0
2013 2020e 2030e 2035e 2013 2020e 2030e 2035e
Coal Oil and gas India China RoW
Nuclear Hydro Other non-OECD Asia
Other Coal share
----- End of picture text -----

16 August 2016

34