Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Benz Mining Corp. Capital/Financing Update 2021

Oct 27, 2021

47017_rns_2021-10-27_251e4f6a-c01d-48dc-8720-4f92ed984a60.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

TSXV:BZ, ASX:BNZ

28 October 2021

==> picture [98 x 90] intentionally omitted <==

Benz secures tenure as part of Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt consolidation

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Benz footprint expanded with acquisition of Windy Mountain Project, a western extension of Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt

  • 69 new claims granted over 36km[2] of prospective tenure, adding approximately 10km additional greenstones strike to the Benz portfolio

  • Sulphides (amenable to detection by electromagnetics) identified in outcrops associated with deformed and altered gabbro with quartz veins; outcropping altered metasediments also observed

  • Historical surface samples show anomalous nickel and copper assays in trench samples returning 0.08% Cu, 0.9% Zn, 0.05% Ni, and 0.8g/t Ag and 0.02% Cu, 0.02% Ni and 0.03% Co

  • Pegmatites were identified at several localities – samples collected; assays pending

Benz Mining Corp. (TSXV:BZ, ASX:BNZ) (the Company or Benz ) is pleased to announce the recent granting from application of additional prospective ground adjacent to its Ruby Hill West Project. The newly acquired tenement package contains 69 claims covering 36km[2] , increasing Benz’ dominant Upper Eastmain land position to 256km[2] .

CEO Xavier Braud commented : “Our strategy is to fast-track growth through discovery, and by rapidly expanding our footprint in a district where we have already made several mineralised discoveries, we lay the foundations for continued success. What is exciting is that the Upper Eastmain greenstone belt is proving to not only be highly prospective for gold, but also for nickel, copper, lithium. We are fortunate to have consolidated an enviable and dominant land position covering the mineralised district.

==> picture [428 x 233] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Windy Mountain and Ruby Hill West Projects with recorded mineral occurrences.

==> picture [595 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [98 x 90] intentionally omitted <==

CEO Xavier Braud commented : “Our analysis of historical work conducted in the Windy Mountain area revealed recorded mineral occurrences coincident with the geology at Ruby Hill West. We were fortunate that this area was not under claim as there has been a lot of tenure activity in the area following our success at Eastmain. With this addition, we bolt on an additional 10km of prospective strike.

We have always held the belief that the Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt has the potential to host its own mining camp with possibly several deposits and commodities such as gold, nickel, copper and lithium, just like many other Archean greenstone belts in the world.

The presence of pyrrhotite associated with favourable rock types in the Windy Mountain area is a great sign as we know we can track this mineral with electromagnetics, a methodology we have successfully employed at our high-grade Eastmain Gold Project.

Controlling a large portion of a greenstone belt bolsters our opportunity for discovery. In addition to the Eastmain gold deposit and the lithium bearing pegmatite at Ruby Hill West, we also have multiple base and precious metals occurrences at Ruby Hill East and West. With the addition of Windy Mountain, we have one more metallic occurrence and several pegmatite outcrops.

Our team has already done a reconnaissance prospecting campaign to the area and collected multiple grab samples of all styles of mineralisation on outcrops and blocs. During this campaign, our teams have also identified occurrences of pegmatite. This is a welcome surprise and confirms the potential of the area for lithium mineralisation, a potential which we shall fully investigate in parallel with our gold drilling.”

==> picture [480 x 299] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt simplified geology, Benz tenure in blue, newly acquired Windy Mountain Project in red.

==> picture [596 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [98 x 90] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [402 x 302] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Sampling pegmatite outcrop at Windy Mountain

==> picture [411 x 232] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Pegmatite Outcrop at Windy Mountain

==> picture [596 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [98 x 90] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [232 x 308] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Sulphide mineralisation in outcrop at Windy Mountain

==> picture [231 x 307] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: Quartz Sulphide vein in mafic host rock at Windy Mountain

About Benz Mining Corp.

Benz Mining Corp. (TSXV: BZ; ASX: BNZ) brings together an experienced team of geoscientists and finance professionals with a focused strategy to acquire and develop mineral projects with an emphasis on safe, low risk jurisdictions favourable to mining development. Benz is earning a 100% interest in the former producing high grade Eastmain gold mine, Ruby Hill West and Ruby Hill East projects in Quebec and owns 100% of the Windy Mountain Project.

About the Eastmain Gold Project

The Eastmain Gold Project, situated on the Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt in Quebec, Canada, currently hosts a NI 43-101 and JORC (2012) compliant resource of 376,000oz at 7.9gpt gold (Indicated: 236,500oz at 8.2gtp gold, Inferred: 139,300oz at 7.5gtp gold). The existing gold mineralisation is associated with 15-20% semi-massive to massive pyrrhotite, pyrite and chalcopyrite in highly deformed and altered rocks making it amenable to detection using electromagnetic techniques. Multiple gold occurrences have been identified by previous explorers over a 10km long zone along strike from the Eastmain Mine with very limited but highly encouraging testing outside the existing resource area. Benz has subsequently identified over 150 DHEM conductors over a strike length of 6km which is open in all directions.

==> picture [595 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [93 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [503 x 313] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7: Benz tenure over Upper Eastmain Greenstone Belt simplified geology.

This press release was prepared under supervision and approved by Dr. Danielle Giovenazzo, P.Geo, acting as Benz’s qualified person under National Instrument 43-101.

Approved for release by the Board of Benz Mining Corp.

For more information please contact: Paul Fowler Xavier Braud Head of Corporate Development (Canada) CEO, Head of Corporate Development Benz Mining Corp. (Australia) Telephone: +1 416 356 8165 Benz Mining Corp. Email: [email protected] Telephone +61 8 6143 6702 Email: [email protected]

==> picture [455 x 61] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [596 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [93 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Forward-Looking Information: Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute "forwardlooking information" as such term is used in applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking information is based on plans, expectations and estimates of management at the date the information is provided and is subject to certain factors and assumptions, including, that the Company's financial condition and development plans do not change as a result of unforeseen events and that the Company obtains regulatory approval. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause plans, estimates and actual results to vary materially from those projected in such forward-looking information. Factors that could cause the forward-looking information in this news release to change or to be inaccurate include, but are not limited to, the risk that any of the assumptions referred to prove not to be valid or reliable, that occurrences such as those referred to above are realized and result in delays, or cessation in planned work, that the Company's financial condition and development plans change, and delays in regulatory approval, as well as the other risks and uncertainties applicable to the Company as set forth in the Company's continuous disclosure filings filed under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, other than as required by applicable law.

NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS RELEASE.

JORC Competent Person’s Statements: The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on and fairly represents information and supporting information compiled by Mr Xavier Braud, who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG membership ID:6963). Mr Braud is a consultant to the Company and has sufficient experience in the style of mineralization and type of deposits under consideration and qualifies as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Braud holds securities in Benz Mining Corp and consents to the inclusion of all technical statements based on his information in the form and context in which they appear.

The information in this announcement that relates to the Inferred Mineral Resource was first reported under the JORC Code by the Company in its prospectus released to the ASX on 21 December 2020. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and confirms that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimate continue to apply and have not materially changed. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

==> picture [596 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 1: JORC Tables

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or
specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate
to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should
not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity
and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be
relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1
m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge
for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required,
such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
•Assay results in this press release are historical assay results
available on SIGEOM, Quebec’s public geological information portal.
•Samples are registered as trench samples. The methodology is not
detailed in the historical information but trench samples are typically
composite rock chips samples over the length of a hand dug trench
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air
blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
•No drilling reported
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries
and results assessed.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade
•No drilling reported

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
•No drilling reported
Sub-sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and
whether sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the
in situ material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
•No drilling reported
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments,
etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including
instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been
established.
•Benz does not have a record of the original laboratory certificates
•Samples

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
•No twinning of holes at this stage
•All sampling protocols have been peer reviewed and all data is
stored appropriately
•No adjustments to assay data have taken place.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations
used in Mineral Resource estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
•All drillhole locations have been surveyed by handheld GPS with a
typical accuracy of +/-4m
•Downhole surveys are conducted using a Reflex Multishot Gyro or
an Axis North Seeking Gyro.
•Grid: UTM NAD83 Zone 18N
•Topographic control is cross-checked with a 2013 LIDAR survey
Data spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish
the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
Whether sample compositing has been applied.
•All drilling conducted by Benz Mining in 2020 and 2021 is wide
spaced and exploratory in nature.
• Spacing between drillholes is typically 100m which is insufficient for
resource estimation
Orientation of
data in
relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of
possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering
the deposit type.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation
of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
•Drilling targeted newly identified areas in the geological system. All
drilling is oriented towards the SW. As some mineralisation at the
project is seemingly dipping toward the NE the orientation of
sampling should not introduce a bias in the samples.
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure sample security. •All samples are routinely cut and prepared on site by company
employees and contractors.
•Samples bags are sealed and transported to the laboratory directly
from the sampling site by specialized transport companies.

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Audits or
reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and
data.
•The Company is constantly reviewing its sampling and assaying
policies. No external audit has been conducted at this stage.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,
historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any
known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
•The Eastmain Mine Project comprises 152 contiguous mining claims
each with an area of approximately 52.7 ha covering a total of
8,014.36 ha plus one industrial lease permit that are owned by
Eastmain Mines Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Fury Gold Mines.
The claims are numbered 1133433 to 1133583 consecutively plus
claim 104458 (Figure 4.2). All of the claims are located within NTS
sheet 33A 08.
•The former Mine Lease BM 817 was issued on January 10, 1995 and
expired in 2015 after a 20-year term. This former Mine Lease was
converted to Industrial Lease 00184710000 on September 1, 2015
and contains all normal surface rights. The former mineral rights for
BM 817 are now included in the expanded Claims 1133523,
1133524, 1133525, 1133505, 1133506 and 1133507.
•The claims are 100% held by Fury Gold Mines subject to certain net
smelter royalties (“NSR”).
•On August 9, 2019, Benz Mining Corp. announced that it has entered
into an option agreement with Eastmain Resources Inc. (now Fury
Gold Mines) to acquire a 100% interest in the former producing
Eastmain Gold Project located in James Bay District, Quebec, for
CAD $5,000,000.
•Eastmain Resources would retain a 2% Net Smelter Return royalty in
respect of the Project. Benz may, at any time, purchase one half of
the NSR Royalty, thereby reducing the NSR Royalty to a 1% net
smelter returns royalty, for $1,500,000.
•The Eastmain Mine, as defined by the perimeter of a historic mining

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
lease, is subject to a production royalty net smelter return (“NSR”) of
2.3% through production of the next 250,000 oz produced and 2%
thereafter. A package of claims surrounding the mine precinct is
subject to a production royalty (NSR) of 2% in favor of Goldcorp as a
result of their succession to Placer Dome in an agreement dated
December 30, 1988 between Placer Dome, MSV Resources Inc. and
Northgate Exploration Limited.
•The 152 claims that form the Eastmain Mine Property are all in good
standing with an active status.
Exploration
done by other
parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. •1930s & 1940s – Prospecting of gossans
•1950s & 1960s – Riocanex – Exploration of the Upper Eastmain
Greenstone Belt
•Mid 1960s – Fort George – Diamond drilling of a gossan zone
•1696 – Canex Aerial Exploration Ltd & Placer Development Ltd –
Airborne magnetic and EM surveys with ground geophysics follow
up.
•1970 – Placer Development Ltd – Seven holes testing an EM
anomaly. Discovery of A Zone with 1.5m @ 13.71g/t Au
•1974 – Nordore – Aerodat airborne AEM survey and Ground
geophysics. 3 holes returned anomalous gold values adjacent to B
Zone
•1974 – Inco Uranerz – Airborne geophysical survey over the whole
greenstone belt.
•1981 & 1982 – Placer – Airborne and ground EM, ground magnetics.
Drilling of EM anomalies discovered B zone and C zone.

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
•1983 to 1985 – Placer – Airborne and ground EM, downhole PEM,
91 holes over A B and C zones.
•1986 – Placer – 25 holes into A B and C zones
•1987 &1988 – Placer Dome / MSV JV – Drilling of A, B and C zones
•1988 to 1994 – MSV Resources – Drilling, surface sampling,
trenching, regional exploration, Seismic refraction over ABC Zones,
•1994 & 1995 – MSV Resources – Mining of 118,356t at 10.58g/t Au
and 0.3%Cu, processed at Copper Rand plant in Chibougamau,
40,000oz recovered
•1997 – MSV Resources- Exploration, mapping, prospecting,
trenching.
•2004 - Campbell Resources – M&I resource calculation for Eastmain
Mine.
•2005-2007 - Eastmain Resources – Purchase of the project from
Campbell Resources, VTEM, Prospecting, regional exploration.
•2007-2019 – Eastmain Resources – Sporadic drilling, regional
exploration, mapping, sampling, trenching. Surface geochemistry
(soils)
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. •In the Eastmain Gold Deposit, gold mineralization occurs in quartz
veins with associated massive to semi-massive sulphide lenses/
veins and silicified zones associated with a deformation corridor.
•The mineralized zones are 3 m to 10 m thick and contained in a
strongly deformed and altered assemblage (Mine series) consisting

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
of felsic, mafic and ultramafic rocks.
•Mineralized quartz veins and lenses show a variable thickness
between 10 cm and 13 m, and sulphide contents average 15% to
20% in the mineralized quartz veins and sulphide lenses. In order of
decreasing abundance, sulphides consist of pyrrhotite, pyrite, and
chalcopyrite, with minor sphalerite, magnetite and molybdenite.
Visible gold occurs in the mineralized quartz veins as small (<1 mm)
grains associated with quartz and (or) sulphides in the A, B and C
Zones.
•At E Zone, mineralization is also associated with a Tonalite intrusion.
Mineralisation occurs at the upper sheared contact between the
Tonalite and the overlying ultramafic units. Mineralisation also occurs
in veins within the tonalite and in zones displaying silica-sericite-
albite alteration.
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information
for all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from
the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
•No drilling reported
Data
aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade
results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used
_for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of _
•No analytical results reported
•Qualitative observations only

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
such aggregations should be shown in detail.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
angle is known, its nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true
width not known’).
•The exact geometry of the system is still not completely known.
•Drillhole orientation and known structural setting suggest that
drillholes intersected mineralisation close to perpendicularly meaning
that downhole intervals are believed to be close to true
width/thickness.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being
reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
•See figures in the body of text.
Balanced
reporting
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
•No analytical results released in this announcement.
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
•Benz conducts systematic BHEM of each hole drilled as well as
BHEM surveying of historical holes.
•BHEM identified over 150 in-hole and off-hole conductors coincident
or not with drilled mineralization.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.
•Benz Mining is currently conducting a 50,000m drilling campaign
which started in January 2021, approximatively 35,000m has been
executed with c.15,000m remaining
•This drilling is conducted alongside regional FLEM surveys (TMC
Geophysics)
•All new holes will be surveyed by BHEM as well as a selection of

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [92 x 85] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
historical holes.

==> picture [842 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Benz Mining Corp. 401 Bay St, Suite 2100, Toronto, Canada | T: +1.416.356.8165 | Email: [email protected]
----- End of picture text -----