Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Barclays PLC Regulatory Filings 2011

Jul 15, 2011

5250_ffr_2011-07-15_e6f3cc54-ac12-41bc-a2fb-655c0c5e733e.zip

Regulatory Filings

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

July 15, 2011

Barclays PLC and

Barclays Bank PLC

(Names of Registrants)

1 Churchill Place

London E14 5HP

England

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports

under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F x Form 40-F

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information

contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the

Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes No x

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant

in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):

This Report is a joint Report on Form 6-K filed by Barclays PLC and Barclays

Bank PLC. All of the issued ordinary share capital of Barclays Bank PLC is

owned by Barclays PLC.

This Report comprises:

Information given to The London Stock Exchange and furnished pursuant to

General Instruction B to the General Instructions to Form 6-K.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Results of 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test dated 15 July 2011

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the registrants has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BARCLAYS PLC

(Registrant)

Date: July 15, 2011

By: /s/ Patrick Gonsalves


Patrick Gonsalves

Deputy Secretary

BARCLAYS BANK PLC

(Registrant)

Date: July 15, 2011

By: /s/ Patrick Gonsalves


Patrick Gonsalves

Joint Secretary

Barclays PLC

Statement on results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test

Barclays PLC notes the publication of the stress test outcomes for European banks by the European Banking Authority ("EBA") today. In summary and under EBA assumptions:

  • The EBA-defined stressed Core Tier 1 capital ("CT1") ratio is 7.3%. This is significantly above the 5% minimum level set by the EBA.

  • The EBA methodology assumes zero capital value for Barclays investment in BlackRock. Without this deduction Barclays stressed CT1 ratio would be close to 8%.

  • Throughout the stressed period Barclays remains profitable and its capital resources increase.

  • RWAs are assumed to increase by about £150bn resulting in the reduced CT1 ratio.

Outcome of the modelled stressed scenario at 31 December 2012
2010 Basel-defined CT1 ratio 10.8%
2010 EBA-defined CT1 ratio 10.0%
EBA Stress Test Results
2 year cumulative operating profit £ 14,968m
2 year cumulative banking book impairment £ (11,018m)
EBA-calculated risk weighted assets ("RWAs") £567,454m
Resulting EBA stressed CT1 ratio 7.3%

Barclays regularly conducts stress tests, for internal purposes and for the FSA. The results consistently demonstrate that Barclays has capital in excess of all regulatory requirements.

Notes:

· The stress test was carried out based on the EBA common methodology and key common assumptions (e.g. constant balance sheet, uniform treatment of securitisation exposures) as published in the EBA Methodological Note and is intended by the EBA to provide a what-if analysis aimed at supporting the supervisory assessment of the adequacy of capital of European banks. Therefore, the information relative to the baseline scenarios is provided only for comparison purposes. Neither the baseline scenario nor the adverse scenario should in any way be construed as a Barclays forecast or directly compared to other information prepared by Barclays.

· More details on the scenarios, assumptions and methodology are available from the EBA website: http://eba.europe.eu/EU-wide-stress-testing/2011.aspx

· The EBA stress test methodology makes no allowance for management actions regarding portfolio composition over time or cost reductions to mitigate the modelled stresses. The full summary of EBA stress test results, attached in the Appendix to this announcement, provides further details of the impact of these stresses on Barclays. A GBP-denominated spreadsheet is available via the Investor Relations website: http://group.barclays.com/Investor-Relations/Investor-news/Regulatory-announcements

· Barclays expects to announce its Interim Results for the 6 months to the end of June 2011 on 2 August 2011.

· Barclays is a major global financial services provider engaged in retail banking, credit cards, corporate and investment banking and wealth management with an extensive international presence in Europe, the Americas, Africa and Asia. With over 300 years of history and expertise in banking, Barclays operates in over 50 countries and employs over 147,000 people. Barclays moves, lends, invests and protects money for over 48 million customers and clients worldwide. For further information about Barclays, please visit our website www.barclays.com . Neither the content of the Barclays website nor any website accessible by hyperlinks on the Barclays website is incorporated in, or forms any part of, this announcement

  • ENDS-

For enquiries, please contact:

Barclays PLC

Investor Relations Media Relations

Stephen Jones Giles Croot

+44 (0) 20 7116 5752 +44 (0) 20 7116 4755

Appendix

Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Name of the bank: Barclays
Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, %
Operating profit before impairments 13,243
Impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book -6,571
Risk weighted assets (4) 461,107
Core Tier 1 capital (4) 46,232
Core Tier 1 capital ratio, % (4) 10.0%
Additional capital needed to reach a 5 % Core Tier 1 capital benchmark 0
Outcomes of the adverse scenario at 31 December 2012, excluding all mitigating actions taken in 2011 %
Core Tier 1 Capital ratio 7.3%
Outcomes of the adverse scenario at 31 December 2012, including recognised mitigating measures as of 30 April 2011 million EUR, %
2 yr cumulative operating profit before impairments 17,340
of which 2 yr cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book -6,137
of which valuation losses due to sovereign shock -752
2 yr cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book -12,764
Risk weighted assets 657,378
Core Tier 1 Capital 48,039
Core Tier 1 Capital ratio (%) 7.3%
Additional capital needed to reach a 5 % Core Tier 1 capital benchmark 0
Effects from the recognised mitigating measures put in place until 30 April 2011 (5)
Equity raisings announced and fully committed between 31 December 2010 and 30 April 2011 (CT1 million EUR)
Effect of government support publicly announced and fully committed in period from 31 December 2010 to 30 April 2011 on Core Tier 1 capital ratio (percentage points of CT1 ratio)
Effect of mandatory restructuring plans, publicly announced and fully committed in period from 31 December 2010 to 30 April 2011 on Core Tier 1 capital ratio (percentage points of CT1 ratio)
Additional taken or planned mitigating measures percentage points contributing to capital ratio
Use of provisions and/or other reserves (including release of countercyclical provisions)
Divestments and other management actions taken by 30 April 2011
Other disinvestments and restructuring measures, including also future mandatory restructuring not yet approved with the EU Commission under the EU State Aid rules
Future planned issuances of common equity instruments (private issuances)
Future planned government subscriptions of capital instruments (including hybrids)
Other (existing and future) instruments recognised as appropriate back-stop measures by national supervisory authorities
Supervisory recognised capital ratio after all current and future mitigating actions as of 31 December 2012, % (6) 7.3%
Notes
(1) The stress test was carried using the EBA common methodology, which includes a static balance sheet assumption and incorporates regulatory transitional floors, where binding (see http://www.eba.europa.eu/EU-wide-stress-testing/2011.aspx for the details on the EBA methodology).
(2) All capital elements and ratios are presented in accordance with the EBA definition of Core Tier 1 capital set up for the purposes of the EU-wide stress test, and therefore may differ from the definitions used by national supervisory authorities and/or reported by institutions in public disclosures.
(3) Neither baseline scenario nor the adverse scenario and results of the stress test should in any way be construed as a bank's forecast or directly compared to bank's other published information.
(4) Full static balance sheet assumption excluding any mitigating management actions, mandatory restructuring or capital raisings post 31 December 2010 (all government support measures and capital raisings fully paid in before 31 December 2010 are included).
(5) Effects of capital raisings, government support and mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed in period from 31 December 2010 to 30 April 2011, which are incorporated in the Core Tier 1 capital ratio reported as the outcome of the stress test.
(6) The supervisory recognised capital ratio computed on the basis of additional mitigating measures presented in this section. The ratio is based primarily on the EBA definition, but may include other mitigating measures not recognised by the EBA methodology as having impacts in the Core Tier 1 capital, but which are considered by the national supervisory authorities as appropriate mitigating measures for the stressed conditions. Where applicable, such measures are explained in the additional announcements issued by banks/national supervisory authorities. Details of all mitigating measures are presented in the worksheet "3 - Mitigating measures).
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Aggregate information and evolution of capital (1-4)
Name of the bank: Barclays
All in million EUR, or %
A. Results of the stress test based on the full static balance sheet assumption without any mitigating actions, mandatory restructuring or capital raisings post 31 December 2010 (all government support measures fully paid in before 31 December 2010 are included)
Capital adequacy 2010 Baseline scenario Adverse scenario
2011 2012 2011 2012
Risk weighted assets (full static balance sheet assumption) 461,107 527,522 541,911 595,739 657,378
Common equity according to EBA definition 46,232 49,141 54,148 46,101 48,039
of which ordinary shares subscribed by government
Other existing subscribed government capital (before 31 December 2010)
Core Tier 1 capital (full static balance sheet assumption) 46,232 49,141 54,148 46,101 48,039
Core Tier 1 capital ratio (%) 10.0% 9.3% 10.0% 7.7% 7.3%
B. Results of the stress test recognising capital issuance and mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed before 31 December 2010
Capital adequacy 2010 Baseline scenario Adverse scenario
2011 2012 2011 2012
Risk weighted assets (full static balance sheet assumption) 461,107 527,522 541,911 595,739 657,378
Effect of mandatory restructuring plans, publicly announced and fully committed before 31 December 2010 on RWA (+/-)
Risk weighted assets after the effects of mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed before 31 December 2010 461,107 527,522 541,911 595,739 657,378
Core Tier 1 Capital (full static balance sheet assumption) 46,232 49,141 54,148 46,101 48,039
Effect of mandatory restructuring plans, publicly announced and fully committed before 31 December 2010 on Core Tier 1 capital (+/-)
Core Tier 1 capital after the effects of mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed before 31 December 2010 46,232 49,141 54,148 46,101 48,039
Core Tier 1 capital ratio (%) 10.0% 9.3% 10.0% 7.7% 7.3%
C. Results of the stress test recognising capital issuance and mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed before 30 April 2011
Capital adequacy 2010 Baseline scenario Adverse scenario
2011 2012 2011 2012
Risk weighted assets after the effects of mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed before 31 December 2010 461,107 527,522 541,911 595,739 657,378
Effect of mandatory restructuring plans, publicly announced and fully committed in period from 31 December 2010 to 30 April 2011 on RWA (+/-)
Risk weighted assets after the effects of mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed before 30 April 2011 527,522 541,911 595,739 657,378
of which RWA in banking book 349,229 350,149 370,596 384,240
of which RWA in trading book 99,229 99,229 100,762 100,762
of which RWA on securitisation positions (banking and trading book) 40,124 53,593 85,441 133,437
Total assets after the effects of mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed and equity raised and fully committed by 30 April 2011 1,725,709 1,725,709 1,725,709 1,725,709 1,725,709
Core Tier 1 capital after the effects of mandatory restructuring plans publicly announced and fully committed before 31 December 2010 46,232 49,141 54,148 46,101 48,039
Equity raised between 31 December 2010 and 30 April 2011
Equity raisings fully committed (but not paid in) between 31 December 2010 and 30 April 2011
Effect of government support publicly announced and fully committed in period from 31 December 2010 to 30 April 2011 on Core Tier 1 capital (+/-)
Effect of mandatory restructuring plans, publicly announced and fully committed in period from 31 December 2010 to 30 April 2011 on Core Tier 1 capital (+/-)
Core Tier 1 capital after government support, capital raisings and effects of restructuring plans fully committed by 30 April 2011 49,141 54,148 46,101 48,039
Tier 1 capital after government support, capital raisings and effects of restructuring plans fully committed by 30 April 2011 58,244 63,251 54,625 56,562
Total regulatory capital after government support, capital raisings and effects of restructuring plans fully committed by 30 April 2011 80,924 86,440 77,205 79,778
Core Tier 1 capital ratio (%) 10.0% 9.3% 10.0% 7.7% 7.3%
Additional capital needed to reach a 5% Core Tier 1 capital benchmark
Profit and losses 2010 Baseline scenario Adverse scenario
2011 2012 2011 2012
Net interest income 14,508 13,100 12,450 12,692 12,159
Trading income 9,358 8,028 8,011 5,817 6,329
of which trading losses from stress scenarios -1,113 -1,131 -3,325 -2,812
of which valuation losses due to sovereign shock -376 -376
Other operating income (5) 12,125 11,853 12,127 11,549 11,922
Operating profit before impairments 13,243 9,958 11,339 8,038 9,302
Impairments on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book (6) -6,571 -4,385 -3,946 -6,501 -6,263
Operating profit after impairments and other losses from the stress 6,672 5,573 7,393 1,536 3,039
Other income (5,6) 310 102 95 100 90
Net profit after tax (7) 5,237 4,274 5,328 1,212 2,068
of which carried over to capital (retained earnings) 3,346 2,623 3,481 147 855
of which distributed as dividends 749 587 780 33 192
Additional information 2010 Baseline scenario Adverse scenario
2011 2012 2011 2012
Deferred Tax Assets (8) 2,916 4,024 3,717 5,145 6,187
Stock of provisions (9) 14,428 18,813 22,759 20,930 27,192
of which stock of provisions for non-defaulted assets 3,150 3,184 3,212 3,245 3,298
of which Sovereigns (10) 0 17 30 22 43
of which Institutions (10) 20 37 52 93 125
of which Corporate (excluding Commercial real estate) 827 827 827 827 827
of which Retail (excluding Commercial real estate) 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200
of which Commercial real estate (11) 103 103 103 103 103
of which stock of provisions for defaulted assets 11,278 15,629 19,547 17,685 23,894
of which Corporate (excluding Commercial real estate) 1,930 3,087 3,994 3,853 5,695
of which Retail (excluding commercial real estate) 6,302 8,958 11,297 9,715 13,068
of which Commercial real estate 1,059 1,267 1,440 1,347 1,628
Coverage ratio (%) (12)
Corporate (excluding Commercial real estate) 20% 23% 25% 27% 30%
Retail (excluding Commercial real estate) 30% 32% 32% 33% 34%
Commercial real estate 35% 35% 34% 36% 37%
Loss rates (%) (13)
Corporate (excluding Commercial real estate) 0.3% 0.5% 0.4% 0.9% 0.9%
Retail (excluding Commercial real estate) 0.3% 0.8% 0.7% 1.0% 1.0%
Commercial real estate 0.5% 1.0% 0.8% 1.4% 1.3%
Funding cost (bps) 90 223 339
D. Other mitigating measures (see Mitigating measures worksheet for details), million EUR (14)
All effects as compared to regulatory aggregates as reported in Section C Baseline scenario Adverse scenario
2011 2012 2011 2012
A) Use of provisions and/or other reserves (including release of countercyclical provisions), capital ratio effect (6)
B) Divestments and other management actions taken by 30 April 2011, RWA effect (+/-)
B1) Divestments and other business decisions taken by 30 April 2011, capital ratio effect (+/-)
C) Other disinvestments and restructuring measures, including also future mandatory restructuring not yet approved with the EU Commission under the EU State Aid rules, RWA effect (+/-)
C1) Other disinvestments and restructuring measures, including also future mandatory restructuring not yet approved with the EU Commission under the EU State Aid rules, capital ratio effect (+/-)
D) Future planned issuances of common equity instruments (private issuances), capital ratio effect
E) Future planned government subscriptions of capital instruments (including hybrids), capital ratio effect
F) Other (existing and future) instruments recognised as appropriate back-stop measures by national supervisory authorities, RWA effect (+/-)
F1) Other (existing and future) instruments recognised as appropriate back-stop measures by national supervisory authorities, capital ratio effect (+/-)
Risk weighted assets after other mitigating measures (B+C+F) 527,522 541,911 595,739 657,378
Capital after other mitigating measures (A+B1+C1+D+E+F1) 49,141 54,148 46,101 48,039
Supervisory recognised capital ratio (%)(15) 9.3% 10.0% 7.7% 7.3%
Notes and definitions
(1) The stress test was carried using the EBA common methodology, which includes a static balance sheet assumption (see http://www.eba.europa.eu/EU-wide-stress-testing/2011.aspx for the details on the EBA methodology).
(2) All capital elements and ratios are presented in accordance with the EBA definition of Core Tier 1 capital set up for the purposes of the EU-wide stress test, and therefore may differ from the definitions used by national supervisory authorities and/or reported by institutions in public disclosures.
(3) Neither baseline scenario nor the adverse scenario and results of the stress test should in any way be construed as a bank's forecast or directly compared to bank's other published information.
(4) Regulatory transitional floors are applied where binding. RWA for credit risk have been calculated in accordance with the EBA methodology assuming an additional floor imposed at a level of RWA, before regulatory transitional floors, for December 2010 for both IRB and STA portfolios.
(5) Banks are required to provide explanations of what "Other operating income" and "Other income" constitutes for. Composition of "Other operating income" and "Other income": Other operating income: Net fee and commission income, net investment income Other income: Share of post-tax results of associates and joint ventures, profit on disposals and gain on acquisitions (2010 only)
(6) If under the national legislation, the release of countercyclical provisions and/or other similar reserves is allowed, this figure for 2010 could be included either in rows "Impairments on financial assets in the banking book" or "Other income" for 2010, whereas under the EU-wide stress test methodology such release for 2011-2012 should be reported in Section D as other mitigating measures.
(7) Net profit includes profit attributable to minority interests.
(8) Deferred tax assets as referred to in paragraph 69 of BCBS publication dated December 2010 : "Basel 3 - a global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems".
(9) Stock of provisions includes collective and specific provisions as well as countercyclical provisions, in the jurisdictions, where required by the national legislation.
(10) Provisions for non-defaulted exposures to sovereigns and financial institutions have been computed taking into account benchmark risk parameters (PDs and LGDs) provided by the EBA and referring to external credit ratings and assuming hypothetical scenario of rating agency downgrades of sovereigns.
(11) For definition of commercial real estate please refer to footnote (5) in the worksheet "4 - EADs".
(12) Coverage ratio = stock of provisions on defaulted assets / stock of defaulted assets expressed in EAD for the specific portfolio.
(13) Loss rate = total impairment flow (specific and collective impairment flow) for a year / total EAD for the specific portfolio (including defaulted and non-defaulted assets but excluding securitisation and counterparty credit risk exposures).
(14) All elements are be reported net of tax effects.
(15) The supervisory recognised capital ratio computed on the basis of additional mitigating measures presented in this section. The ratio is based primarily on the EBA definition, but may include other mitigating measures not recognised by the EBA methodology as having impacts in the Core Tier 1 capital, but which are considered by the national supervisory authorities as appropriate mitigating measures for the stressed conditions. Where applicable, such measures are explained in the additional announcements issued by banks/national supervisory authorities. Details of all mitigating measures are presented in the worksheet "3 - Mitigating measures).
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Composition of capital as of 31 December 2010
Name of the bank: Barclays
Situation at December 2010 December 2010 References to COREP reporting
Million EUR % RWA
A) Common equity before deductions (Original own funds without hybrid instruments and government support measures other than ordinary shares) (+) 52,435 11.4% COREP CA 1.1 - hybrid instruments and government support measures other than ordinary shares
Of which: (+) eligible capital and reserves 58,807 12.8% COREP CA 1.1.1 + COREP line 1.1.2.1
Of which: (-) intangibles assets (including goodwill) -9,645 -2.1% Net amount included in T1 own funds (COREP line 1.1.5.1)
Of which: (-/+) adjustment to valuation differences in other AFS assets (1) -394 -0.1% Prudential filters for regulatory capital (COREP line 1.1.2.6.06)
B) Deductions from common equity (Elements deducted from original own funds) (-) -6,203 -1.3% COREP CA 1.3.T1* (negative amount)
Of which: (-) deductions of participations and subordinated claims -3,236 -0.7% Total of items as defined by Article 57 (l), (m), (n) (o) and (p) of Directive 2006/48/EC and deducted from original own funds (COREP lines from 1.3.1 to 1.3.5 included in line 1.3.T1*)
Of which: (-) securitisation exposures not included in RWA -2,733 -0.6% COREP line 1.3.7 included in line 1.3.T1*
Of which: (-) IRB provision shortfall and IRB equity expected loss amounts (before tax) -195 0.0% As defined by Article 57 (q) of Directive 2006/48/EC (COREP line 1.3.8 included in 1.3.T1*)
C) Common equity (A+B) 46,232 10.0%
Of which: ordinary shares subscribed by government 0 0.0% Paid up ordinary shares subscribed by government
D) Other Existing government support measures (+) 0 0.0%
E) Core Tier 1 including existing government support measures (C+D) 46,232 10.0% Common equity + Existing government support measures included in T1 other than ordinary shares
Difference from benchmark capital threshold (CT1 5%) 23,177 5.0% Core tier 1 including government support measures - (RWA*5%)
F) Hybrid instruments not subscribed by government 8,528 1.8% Net amount included in T1 own funds (COREP line 1.1.4.1a + COREP lines from 1.1.2.201 to 1.1.2.205 + COREP line 1.1.5.2a (negative amount)) not subscribed by government
Tier 1 Capital (E+F) (Total original own funds for general solvency purposes) 54,760 11.9% COREP CA 1.4 = COREP CA 1.1 + COREP CA 1.3.T1* (negative amount)
Tier 2 Capital (Total additional own funds for general solvency purposes) 23,528 5.1% COREP CA 1.5
Tier 3 Capital (Total additional own funds specific to cover market risks) 0 0.0% COREP CA 1.6
Total Capital (Total own funds for solvency purposes) 78,289 17.0% COREP CA 1
Memorandum items
Amount of holdings, participations and subordinated claims in credit, financial and insurance institutions not deducted for the computation of core tier 1 but deducted for the computation of total own funds -3,236 -0.7% Total of items as defined by Article 57 (l), (m), (n) (o) and (p) of Directive 2006/48/EC not deducted for the computation of original own funds
Amount of securitisation exposures not included in RWA and not deducted for the computation of core tier 1 but deducted for the computation of total own funds -2,733 -0.6% Total of items as defined by Article 57 (r) of Directive 2006/48/EC not deducted for the computation of original own funds
Deferred tax assets (2) 2,916 0.6% As referred to in paragraph 69 of BCBS publication dated December 2010 : "Basel 3 - a global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems"
Minority interests (excluding hybrid instruments) (2) 3,393 0.7% Gross amount of minority interests as defined by Article 65 1. (a) of Directive 2006/48/EC
Valuation differences eligible as original own funds (-/+) (3) - 0.0% COREP line 1.1.2.6
Notes and definitions
(1) The amount is already included in the computation of the eligible capital and reserves and it is provided separately for information purposes.
(2) According to the Basel 3 framework specific rules apply for the treatment of these items under the Basel 3 framework, no full deduction is required for the computation of common equity.
(3) This item represents the impact in original own funds of valuation differences arising from the application of fair value measurement to certain financial instruments (AFS/FVO) and property assets after the application of prudential filters.
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Overview of mitigating measures (1-2)
Name of the bank: Barclays
Use of countercyclical provisions, divestments and other management actions
Please fill in the table using a separate row for each measure Narrative description Date of completion (actual or planned for future issuances) Capital / P&L impact (in million EUR) RWA impact (in million EUR) Capital ratio impact (as of 31 December 2012) %
A) Use of provisions and/or other reserves (including release of countercyclical provisions), (3)
B) Divestments and other management actions taken by 30 April 2011
1)
C) Other disinvestments and restructuring measures, including also future mandatory restructuring not yet approved with the EU Commission under the EU State Aid rules
1)
Future capital raisings and other back stop measures
Please fill in the table using a separate row for each measure Date of issuance (actual or planned for future issuances, dd/mm/yy) Amount Maturity Loss absorbency in going concern Flexibility of payments (capacity to suspend the payments) Permanence (Undated and without incentive to redeem) Conversion clause (where appropriate)
Nature of conversion Date of conversion Triggers Conversion in common equity
(in million EUR) (dated/ undated) (4) (Yes/No) (Yes/No) (Yes/No) (mandatory/ discretionary) (at any time/from a specific date: dd/mm/yy) (description of the triggers) (Yes/No)
D) Future planned issuances of common equity instruments (private issuances)
E) Future planned government subscriptions of capital instruments (including hybrids)
1) Denomination of the instrument
F) Other (existing and future) instruments recognised as back stop measures by national supervisory authorities (including hybrids)
1) Denomination of the instrument
Notes and definitions
(1) The order of the measures follows the order of mitigating measures reported in the Section D of the worksheet "1 - Aggregate information".
(2) All elements are be reported net of tax effects.
(3) If under the national legislation, the release of countercyclical provisions and/or other similar reserves is allowed, this figure for 2010 could be included either in rows "Impairments on financial assets in the banking book" or "Other income" for 2010, whereas under the EU-wide stress test methodology such release for 2011-2012 should be reported in Section D of the worksheet "1- Aggregate information" as other mitigating measures and explained in this worksheet.
(4) If dated please insert the maturity date (dd/mm/yy) otherwise specify undated.
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Credit risk exposures (EAD - exposure at default), as of 31 December 2010, mln EUR, (1-5)
Name of the bank: Barclays
All values in million EUR, or %
Non-defaulted exposures Defaulted exposures (excluding sovereign) Total exposures (7)
Institutions Corporate (excluding commercial real estate) Retail (excluding commercial real estate) Commercial Real Estate
of which Residential mortgages of which Revolving of which SME of which other Loan to Value (LTV) ratio (%)(6)
Loan to Value (LTV) ratio (%),(6)
Austria 344 439 0 0 0% 0 0 0 53 100% 0 1,211
Belgium 553 2,020 0 0 0% 0 0 0 76 130% 0 3,743
Bulgaria 1 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 1
Cyprus 217 159 47 45 67% 0 0 2 0 0% 0 425
Czech Republic 86 40 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 138
Denmark 303 518 59 0 0% 59 0 0 90 90% 7 1,234
Estonia 0 5 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 7
Finland 326 544 0 0 0% 0 0 0 8 120% 0 964
France 4,087 7,217 4,425 3,819 50% 0 345 261 423 75% 171 17,704
Germany 10,716 7,201 2,447 0 0% 2,078 0 369 2,512 75% 180 38,768
Greece 74 103 19 0 0% 19 0 0 0 0% 13 209
Hungary 272 81 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 400
Iceland 0% 0 0% 0
Ireland 1,614 2,129 0 0 0% 0 0 0 80 140% 4 4,194
Italy 1,258 3,687 18,720 15,587 45% 499 11 2,622 161 75% 534 26,227
Latvia 0 6 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 8
Liechtenstein 0% 0 0% 0
Lithuania 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 3
Luxembourg 415 1,085 135 63 67% 0 64 8 53 85% 11 1,700
Malta 0 44 88 40 47% 0 1 46 0 0% 0 135
Netherlands 1,538 5,714 0 0 0% 0 0 0 215 90% 0 7,668
Norway 221 474 415 0 0% 415 0 0 0 0% 30 1,784
Poland 186 107 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 320
Portugal 163 3,771 6,473 4,024 61% 762 845 841 457 55% 612 12,613
Romania 1 3 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 4
Slovakia 16 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 59
Slovenia 5 1 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 37
Spain 1,138 9,623 21,802 18,197 58% 313 1,837 1,455 1,474 55% 3,617 43,922
Sweden 378 1,315 392 0 0% 392 0 0 536 95% 44 2,751
Non-defaulted exposures Defaulted exposures (excluding sovereign) Total exposures (7)
Institutions Corporate (excluding commercial real estate) Retail (excluding commercial real estate) Commercial Real Estate
of which Residential mortgages of which Revolving of which SME of which other Loan to Value (LTV) ratio (%)(6)
Loan to Value (LTV) ratio (%),(6)
United Kingdom 10,735 111,667 191,592 131,873 43% 36,050 13,756 9,913 12,028 58% 8,358 363,185
United States 4,978 54,155 8,546 30 68% 7,483 65 969 3,487 95% 864 128,465
Japan 1,475 1,046 0 0 0% 0 0 0 268 90% 0 29,727
Other non EEA non Emerging countries 650 373 230 90 56% 0 51 89 11 45% 0 1,387
Asia 4,154 11,129 868 180 54% 41 8 639 193 85% 115 22,383
Middle and South America 702 2,248 233 163 42% 0 65 5 1 70% 0 3,234
Eastern Europe non EEA 2,090 718 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0 2,958
Others 5,176 41,823 60,811 36,883 45% 7,241 3,526 13,161 5,328 65% 6,031 138,784
Total 53,873 269,446 317,301 210,995 45% 55,352 20,575 30,378 27,456 68% 20,593 856,349
Notes and definitions
(1) EAD - Exposure at Default or exposure value in the meaning of the CRD.
(2) The EAD reported here are based on the methodologies and portfolio breakdowns used in the 2011 EU-wide stress test, and hence may differ from the EAD reported by banks in their Pillar 3 disclosures, which can vary based on national regulation. For example, this would affect breakdown of EAD for real estate exposures and SME exposures.
(3) Breakdown by country and macro area (e.g. Asia) when EAD >=5%. In any case coverage 100% of total EAD should be ensured (if exact mapping of some exposures to geographies is not possible, they should be allocated to the group "others").
(4) The allocation of countries and exposures to macro areas and emerging/non-emerging is according to the IMF WEO country groupings. See: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/weodata/groups.htm
(5) Residential real estate property which is or will be occupied or let by the owner, or the beneficial owner in the case of personal investment companies, and commercial real estate property, that is, offices and other commercial premises, which are recognised as eligible collateral in the meaning of the CRD, with the following criteria, which need to be met: (a) the value of the property does not materially depend upon the credit quality of the obligor. This requirement does not preclude situations where purely macro economic factors affect both the value of the property and the performance of the borrower; and (b) the risk of the borrower does not materially depend upon the performance of the underlying property or project, but rather on the underlying capacity of the borrower to repay the debt from other sources. As such, repayment of the facility does not materially depend on any cash flow generated by the underlying property serving as collateral.
(6) Loan to value ratio - ratio of EAD to the market value of real estate used as collateral for such exposures. Given the different methodologies applied to assessing the value, the bank is required to explain the computation of the ratio. In particular (a) whether collateral values is marked-to-market or any other valuation method is used, (b) whether the amount has been adjusted for principal repayments, and (c) how guarantees other than the underlying property are treated. Definition of Loan to Value ratio used: Residential Mortgages: Defined as the amount borrowed secured by residential property as a percentage of the appraised value. Commercial Real Estate: Based on internal management estimates, defined as the ratio of nominal loan balance secured by commercial property to the appraised value of the property.
(7) Total exposures is the total EAD according to the CRD definition based on which the bank computes RWA for credit risk. Total exposures, in addition to the exposures broken down by regulatory portfolios in this table, include EAD for securitisation transactions, counterparty credit risk, sovereigns, guaranteed by sovereigns, public sector entities and central banks.
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Exposures to sovereigns (central and local governments), as of 31 December 2010, mln EUR (1,2)
Name of the bank: Barclays
All values in million EUR
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M Austria 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 -94
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 -53
2Y 2 0 0 0 0 0 38 -12
3Y 14 0 0 0 0 0 -123 -71
5Y 236 0 86 0 0 86 31 124
10Y 96 0 0 0 0 0 19 -123
15Y 252 0 0 0 0 0 64 0
601 0 86 0 0 86 101 -229
3M Belgium 1,696 0 1,462 1,399 0 63 -45 0
1Y 243 0 96 104 0 0 -2 -1
2Y 103 0 61 0 0 61 -134 0
3Y 300 0 273 40 0 233 -194 42
5Y 798 0 659 0 0 659 -18 -159
10Y 161 0 0 0 0 0 -68 83
15Y 149 0 0 0 0 0 -100 0
3,449 0 2,550 1,543 0 1,016 -562 -34
3M Bulgaria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -45
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -60
5Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -14
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -28
3M Cyprus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2Y 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5Y 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0
10Y 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 0
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0 7 0 0 7 0 0
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M Czech Republic 1 0 1 0 0 1 5 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
3Y 12 0 7 0 0 7 0 -52
5Y 33 0 33 0 0 33 -3 -9
10Y 14 0 14 0 0 14 0 -18
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 0 56 0 0 56 2 -8
3M Denmark 56 0 0 0 0 0 23 0
1Y 3 0 3 0 0 3 29 -4
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 -3 -5
3Y 134 0 134 0 0 134 -9 127
5Y 16 0 16 0 0 16 -28 -7
10Y 15 0 0 0 0 0 -22 -1
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2 0
224 0 153 0 0 153 -12 110
3M Estonia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -35
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -14
5Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -12
3M Finland 597 0 20 0 0 20 36 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 -72 0
2Y 8 0 0 0 0 0 -211 -42
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 96
5Y 18 0 0 0 0 0 45 -101
10Y 91 0 91 0 0 91 76 54
15Y 20 0 17 0 0 17 -48 0
734 0 127 0 0 127 -140 7
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M France 1,666 0 0 0 0 0 19 33
1Y 834 0 144 172 0 0 -9 92
2Y 174 0 0 10 0 0 -1 -34
3Y 557 0 325 0 0 325 26 -6
5Y 470 0 0 0 0 0 19 -105
10Y 2,193 0 1,166 0 0 1,166 91 83
15Y 892 0 0 0 0 0 251 0
6,786 0 1,635 182 0 1,491 395 63
3M Germany 370 0 0 148 0 0 383 190
1Y 602 0 356 0 0 350 425 10
2Y 367 0 0 0 0 0 -125 81
3Y 469 0 0 0 0 0 327 -4
5Y 1,524 0 0 0 0 0 232 -59
10Y 496 0 0 0 0 0 412 14
15Y 899 0 0 0 0 0 -867 0
4,727 0 356 148 0 350 786 233
3M Greece 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 -38
1Y 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 63
2Y 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 -11
3Y 48 0 24 0 0 24 2 -39
5Y 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
10Y 55 0 35 0 0 35 0 32
15Y 45 0 34 0 0 34 -4 0
192 0 93 0 0 93 -1 15
3M Hungary 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 100
1Y 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 -75
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -26
3Y 33 0 33 0 0 33 5 -9
5Y 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 96
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -35
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
53 0 34 0 0 34 6 52
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M Iceland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -33
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -29
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1
5Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -56
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -64
3M Ireland 70 0 0 0 0 0 -19 56
1Y 19 0 0 5 0 0 13 -93
2Y 30 0 30 1 0 29 -10 -129
3Y 322 0 316 230 0 85 6 -83
5Y 22 0 21 2 0 19 5 218
10Y 43 0 15 1 0 13 4 -39
15Y 25 0 25 0 0 25 13 0
532 0 407 240 0 171 12 -70
3M Italy 452 0 409 0 0 409 0 44
1Y 1,220 0 692 213 0 479 -1 36
2Y 503 0 217 104 0 113 -210 100
3Y 725 0 581 37 0 544 -4 413
5Y 2,685 0 1,017 589 0 428 -187 -351
10Y 2,263 0 0 434 0 0 -88 -403
15Y 1,532 0 0 0 0 0 733 -33
9,379 0 2,915 1,377 0 1,972 243 -194
3M Latvia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -3
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -55
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
5Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -12
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -23
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M Liechtenstein 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3M Lithuania 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -44
3Y 43 0 43 0 0 43 0 -12
5Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
10Y 8 0 8 0 0 8 0 -7
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
51 0 51 0 0 51 0 -63
3M Luxembourg 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
5Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 -11 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3M Malta 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M Netherlands 562 0 0 0 0 0 246 0
1Y 78 0 70 0 0 70 -127 0
2Y 27 0 13 0 0 13 40 0
3Y 140 0 0 0 0 0 100 -14
5Y 1,387 0 1,120 0 0 1,120 690 -173
10Y 212 0 0 0 0 0 -538 -50
15Y 81 0 0 0 0 0 -145 0
2,486 0 1,203 0 0 1,203 266 -237
3M Norway 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 -38 0
2Y 1 0 1 0 0 1 -189 -60
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 38
5Y 72 0 72 0 0 72 9 -25
10Y 3 0 3 0 0 3 -9 14
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 0
76 0 76 0 0 76 -71 -33
3M Poland 0 0 0 0 0 0 -37 11
1Y 10 0 7 0 0 7 0 -7
2Y 9 0 4 0 0 4 0 94
3Y 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 -43
5Y 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 -26
10Y 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 -22
15Y 18 0 18 0 0 18 0 0
120 0 30 0 0 30 -37 7
3M Portugal 162 0 150 0 0 150 12 -36
1Y 73 7 40 0 0 32 0 1
2Y 332 0 332 332 0 0 49 15
3Y 37 0 0 36 0 0 40 -59
5Y 684 0 646 662 0 0 -1 186
10Y 60 1 0 0 0 0 -176 -124
15Y 7 0 7 0 0 7 130 0
1,356 8 1,174 1,030 0 189 54 -17
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M Romania 104 0 104 0 0 104 0 -18
1Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -7
2Y 24 0 24 0 0 24 0 -6
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68
5Y 24 0 24 0 0 24 0 -3
10Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
15Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
153 0 152 0 0 152 0 42
3M Slovakia 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -15
1Y 12 0 12 0 0 12 2 0
2Y 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 -9
3Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 36
5Y 18 0 10 0 0 10 3 12
10Y 10 0 8 0 0 8 0 -7
15Y 6 0 6 0 0 6 0 0
47 0 37 0 0 37 4 16
3M Slovenia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3Y 32 0 32 0 0 32 0 -11
5Y 32 0 32 31 0 1 0 38
10Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15Y 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
65 0 64 31 0 33 0 28
3M Spain 666 20 174 0 0 154 -4 -57
1Y 717 79 628 372 0 178 -45 172
2Y 2,659 0 2,343 2,596 0 0 -201 -133
3Y 548 0 0 0 0 0 -9 -294
5Y 1,322 0 1,118 1,153 0 0 7 513
10Y 1,959 0 853 1,051 0 0 41 -31
15Y 929 0 379 0 0 379 18 0
8,800 99 5,496 5,172 0 711 -192 169
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M Sweden 1,707 0 0 0 0 0 147 0
1Y 75 0 0 0 0 0 -39 0
2Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 -99 -2
3Y 21 0 0 0 0 0 -41 260
5Y 17 0 0 0 0 0 -15 105
10Y 380 0 368 0 0 368 -13 -176
15Y 87 0 87 0 0 87 -7 0
2,286 0 455 0 0 455 -67 187
3M United Kingdom 142 0 43 0 0 43 -250 0
1Y 504 0 210 0 0 210 -67 0
2Y 201 0 0 0 0 0 -6 0
3Y 685 0 165 0 0 165 -120 30
5Y 870 0 0 62 0 0 -174 -52
10Y 16,140 0 14,807 11,530 0 3,277 -21 18
15Y 10,479 0 1,544 2,289 0 0 -82 0
29,022 0 16,770 13,881 0 3,696 -719 -4
TOTAL EEA 30 71,206 108 33,928 23,604 0 12,190 69 -87
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M United States 895 0 0 0 0 0 14 -7
1Y 6,108 0 2,237 0 0 2,237 18 93
2Y 3,783 0 0 0 0 0 10 405
3Y 5,621 0 528 0 0 528 28 239
5Y 7,011 366 0 0 0 0 22 -499
10Y 5,266 0 0 0 0 0 64 -16
15Y 15,046 0 8,714 0 0 8,714 432 0
43,731 366 11,480 0 0 11,480 590 214
3M Japan 2,046 0 2,046 1,904 0 142 -39 -44
1Y 313 0 0 0 0 0 -151 10
2Y 964 0 700 0 0 700 -177 -10
3Y 1,413 0 476 301 0 174 -180 71
5Y 1,534 0 0 312 0 0 57 -76
10Y 3,241 0 1,756 2,048 0 0 81 -10
15Y 2,496 46 350 0 0 350 80 0
12,008 46 5,327 4,565 0 1,366 -328 -60
3M Other non EEA non Emerging countries 7,070 0 5,769 671 0 5,098 104 0
1Y 175 0 154 0 0 154 -38 0
2Y 69 0 33 0 0 33 3 0
3Y 27 0 0 0 0 0 -19 -14
5Y 238 0 169 160 0 9 -538 -26
10Y 148 0 0 78 0 0 31 0
15Y 18 0 0 0 0 0 -424 0
7,745 0 6,125 910 0 5,294 -881 -40
3M Asia 2,013 0 1,807 406 0 1,190 122 -230
1Y 1,347 0 1,214 197 0 944 14 -188
2Y 738 1 633 119 0 514 -3 142
3Y 731 9 645 0 0 645 -16 -188
5Y 1,066 2 964 0 0 964 -33 91
10Y 399 10 295 0 0 295 -7 -56
15Y 108 0 55 0 0 55 14 -19
6,402 22 5,612 722 0 4,606 91 -448
Residual Maturity Country/Region GROSS DIRECT LONG EXPOSURES (accounting value gross of specific provisions) NET DIRECT POSITIONS (gross exposures (long) net of cash short position of sovereign debt to other counterparties only where there is maturity matching) DIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN DERIVATIVES INDIRECT SOVEREIGN EXPOSURES IN THE TRADING BOOK
of which: loans and advances of which: AFS banking book of which: FVO (designated at fair value through profit&loss) banking book of which: Trading book (3) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value) Net position at fair values (Derivatives with positive fair value + Derivatives with negative fair value)
3M Middle and South America 1,190 0 944 0 0 944 -3,354 -80
1Y 343 0 223 0 0 223 -37 -293
2Y 391 0 262 0 0 262 213 195
3Y 207 0 80 0 0 80 1 522
5Y 325 0 58 0 0 58 4 54
10Y 335 0 77 0 0 77 110 -31
15Y 509 0 176 0 0 176 59 -146
3,300 0 1,820 0 0 1,820 -3,005 221
3M Eastern Europe non EEA 3 0 1 0 0 1 -1,099 138
1Y 96 0 96 0 0 96 0 -354
2Y 94 0 92 0 0 92 -32 244
3Y 187 0 175 0 0 69 9 2
5Y 59 12 39 0 0 39 -97 -292
10Y 118 0 98 0 0 98 4 -96
15Y 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
578 12 500 0 0 394 -1,216 -359
3M Others 11,160 0 11,153 0 0 356 -390 90
1Y 1,582 0 1,581 0 0 176 1 161
2Y 1,528 1,496 30 0 0 30 -10 -192
3Y 79 5 73 0 0 1 -17 13
5Y 693 255 410 0 0 79 42 96
10Y 1,171 1,102 26 0 0 26 -9 -107
15Y 16 0 14 0 0 14 3 0
16,229 2,859 13,288 0 0 682 -380 61
TOTAL 161,199 3,412 78,081 29,801 0 37,833 -5,060 -498
Notes and definitions
(1) The allocation of countries and exposures to macro areas and emerging/non-emerging is according to the IMF WEO country groupings. See: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/weodata/groups.htm
(2) The exposures reported in this worksheet cover only exposures to central and local governments on immediate borrower basis, and do not include exposures to other counterparts with full or partial government guarantees (such exposures are however included in the total EAD reported in the worksheet "4 - EADs").
(3) According to the EBA methodologies, for the trading book assets banks have been allowed to offset only cash short positions having the same maturities (paragraph 202 of the Methodological note).