AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

Bank Hapoalim B.M.

Capital/Financing Update Oct 11, 2021

6991_rns_2021-10-11_05fe9ae7-66b8-4f88-8cd9-3754c67db8a3.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

Israel-Based Bank Hapoalim Proposed Tier 2 Subordinated Notes Assigned 'BBB' Rating

October 11, 2021

MILAN (S&P Global Ratings) Oct. 11, 2021--S&P Global Ratings said today that it had assigned its 'BBB' long-term issue rating to the proposed Tier 2 subordinated contingent capital notes with a loss absorption mechanism to be issued by Israel-based Bank Hapoalim B.M. (A/Stable/A-1). The rating is subject to our review of the notes' final documentation. This is Bank Hapoalim's first issuance of contingent convertible notes in foreign currency.

In accordance with our criteria for hybrid capital instruments (see "General Criteria: Hybrid Capital: Methodology And Assumptions," published July 1, 2019), the 'BBB' issue rating reflects our analysis of the proposed instrument and our assessment of Bank Hapoalim's stand-alone credit profile (SACP) at 'a-'. The starting point for the rating on the subordinated contingent capital notes is the bank's SACP. We don't use the issuer credit rating (ICR) as the starting point, since it includes government support and we do not expect these instruments to benefit from state support.

The issue rating stands two notches below the 'a-' SACP, due to the following deductions:

  • One notch for default risk. This reflects the loss absorption mechanism built into the instruments, under which a principal loss absorption event or a nonviability event trigger instrument principal conversion. A principal loss absorption event occurs when the common equity Tier 1 ratio falls below 5%. A nonviability event is defined as the earlier of: a written notice by the Bank Supervisor to the bank that a conversion is necessary since without it the bank will become nonviable, in the view of the Supervisor; or a decision to inject capital from the public sector, or an equivalent support mechanism, without which the bank will reach the point of nonviability as determined by the Bank Supervisor.
  • One notch for subordination. This reflects the contractual subordination of the proposed notes with respect to the bank's senior obligations.

Evaluating the instrument in light of our bank hybrid methodology, in our view there are no additional nonpayment risks that would justify deduction of additional notches beyond those noted above. In particular, based on our view of the bank's current creditworthiness, we consider that the low likelihood of regulatory discretionary intervention does not require deduction of any additional notch to determine the final rating on these notes.

The notes are must-pay instruments with no deferrable coupons and we assign them minimal equity content when computing our Total Adjusted Capital.

PRIMARY CREDIT ANALYST

Regina Argenio

Milan + 39 0272111208 regina.argenio @spglobal.com

SECONDARY CONTACT

Lena Schwartz RAMAT-GAN + 972-3-7539716 lena.schwartz @spglobal.com

Related Criteria

  • General Criteria: Hybrid Capital: Methodology And Assumptions, July 1, 2019
  • General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019
  • General Criteria: Methodology For National And Regional Scale Credit Ratings, June 25, 2018
  • Criteria | Financial Institutions | General: Risk-Adjusted Capital Framework Methodology, July 20, 2017
  • General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Long-Term And Short-Term Ratings, April 7, 2017
  • Criteria | Financial Institutions | Banks: Quantitative Metrics For Rating Banks Globally: Methodology And Assumptions, July 17, 2013
  • Criteria | Financial Institutions | Banks: Banks: Rating Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 9, 2011
  • Criteria | Financial Institutions | Banks: Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 9, 2011
  • General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011

Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. A description of each of S&P Global Ratings' rating categories is contained in "S&P Global Ratings Definitions" at https://www.standardandpoors.com/en_US/web/guest/article/-/view/sourceId/504352 Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. Alternatively, call one of the following S&P Global Ratings numbers: Client Support Europe (44) 20-7176-7176; London Press Office (44) 20-7176-3605; Paris (33) 1-4420-6708; Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-225; Stockholm (46) 8-440-5914; or Moscow 7 (495) 783-4009.

Copyright © 2021 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

STANDARD & POOR'S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC.

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.