BAILLIE GIFFORD EUROPEAN GROWTH TRUST PLC

Annual Report • Dec 19, 2025

Annual Report and Financial Statements Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 30 September 2025 Notes None of the views expressed in this document should be construed as advice to buy or sell a particular investment. Investment trusts are UK public listed companies and as such comply with the requirements of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’). They are not authorised or regulated by the FCA. Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc currently conducts its affairs, and intends to continue to conduct its affairs, so that the Company’s ordinary shares can qualify to be considered as a mainstream investment product and can be recommended by Independent Financial Advisers to ordinary retail investors in accordance with the rules of the FCA in relation to non-mainstream investment products. This document is important and requires your immediate attention. If you reside in the UK and you are in any doubt as to the action you should take, you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial adviser authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 immediately. If you reside outwith the UK, you should consult an appropriately authorised financial adviser. Investor Disclosure Document The UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations require certain information to be made available to investors prior to their investment in the Company. The Company’s Investor Disclosure Document is available for viewing at bgeuropeangrowth.com If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your holding in Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc, please forward this document, together with accompanying documents, but not your personalised form of proxy, as soon as possible to the purchaser or transferee, or to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was or is being effected for delivery to the purchaser or transferee. Cover image: Aurora Borealis over Tromsø innorthern Norway. 01 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Introduction Financial highlights 02 Baillie Gifford – philosophy and process 04 Strategic report Chairman’s statement 07 Managers’ report 11 Review of investments 18 One year summary 22 Five year summary 24 Ten year record 26 Business review 28 Baillie Gifford statement on stewardship 41 Environmental, social and governance engagement 42 Baillie Gifford – proxy voting 45 List of investments 46 Distribution of total assets 48 Governance report Directors and management 50 Directors’ report 53 Corporate governance report 58 Audit Committee report 65 Directors’ remuneration report 68 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 72 Financial report Independent Auditor’s report 75 Income statement 82 Balance sheet 83 Statement of changes in equity 84 Cash flow statement 85 Notes to the Financial Statements 86 Shareholder information Notice of Annual General Meeting 103 Further shareholder information 109 Communicating with shareholders 111 Third party data provider disclaimer 114 Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation 115 Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures 116 Company information 119 Contents Introduction Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 02 Financial highlights Year to 30 September 2025 Share price * 14.5% NAV (borrowings at book value) * † 5.2% NAV (borrowings at fair value) * † 5.5% Comparative index * # 15.5% * Alternative performance measure – see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. † Key Performance Indicator. # The benchmark is the FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms). Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 114. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc aims to achieve capital growth over the long-term from a diversified portfolio of European securities. NAV, share price and benchmark total return * (figures rebased to 100 at 30 September 2025) Discount to net asset value (borrowings at fair value) * (figures plotted on a weekly basis) S 2025 S 2024 ONDJF MAM J JA ● Share price ● NAV † ● Benchmark # 90 120 110 100 2025 2024 S SO NDJFMAMJ JA ● Discount ● Average discount (18%) (15%) (12%) (9%) (6%) Total returns Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 03 Introduction Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 04 Baillie Gifford – philosophy and process Our philosophy To generate remarkable returns over time we strongly believe that our investment philosophy and process need to break from convention. Since the inception of our first European equities strategy in 1985 we have been working on this very task. We have always believed that being longer-term than most and being truly active would tip the odds of outperforming in ourfavour. Now however, we also have a much greater understanding of the hidden asymmetry in equity markets. Wealth creation and outperformance are not generated by lots of slightly better-than-average companies; they are generated by a very small number of special companies that go on to produce huge returns over long periods of time. These are the outliers we are looking for. They endure and prosper thanks to attractive growth opportunities and unique corporate cultures that translate into strong competitive advantages. They are mostly owned or managed by entrepreneurial founders, families or other inside owners, who tend to focus more on sustainability and protecting the interests of employees and customers. Our philosophy and process have evolved over time to give ourselves the best chance of finding these outliers, and to own them for the long-term. We need to think in decades rather than quarters; we need differentiated sources of insight; we need to think about what might go right rather than wrong; and we need to have the right corporate culture that encourages and supports our way of thinking. Long-term We believe great businesses can be structurally mispriced as the market often underestimates their durability and attractiveness. At the same time, most investors have a time horizon that is far too short to fully appreciate the potential of outstanding businesses; they are neither willing nor able to align themselves with the timescale of achievement of great businesses. Capturing significant upside requires the adoption ofa long-term mindset: we must think about companies, their progress and opportunities, not in months and quarters but in years and decades. We must have the courage and conviction to own businesses through thick and thin. While in aggregate our average holding period will typically be between five and ten years, implying a portfolio turnover of 10–20%, we are likely to hold individual companies for a much longer period. Growth We are looking for each company we invest in to have the potential to at least double in value on a five year view. Our analysis shows this is correlated with earnings growth rather than a change in valuation. For that reason, we focus on companies that have large, structural growth opportunities, and that are capable of reinvesting at high rates of return as a result of strong competitive advantages. Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 05 Optimism Thinking creatively and optimistically are critical underpinnings if we are aiming to invest in Europe’s outliers. We need to think about what can go right, rather than what can go wrong in an investment case. We need to be willing to embrace uncertainty and recognise that we will make mistakes. We need to recognise that returns in equity markets are asymmetric, with the maximum loss capped to the initial stake and the upside unbounded. In our portfolios, the driving force behind returns is not the occasional misstep, but rather the highly successful investments. As humans, we are programmed to dislike losses far more than we enjoy gains. However, we know that stock market returns are highly skewed, with overall returns dominated by a small subset of outliers. We must guard against this cognitive bias and remain resolute in our pursuit of investing in Europe’s great growth companies. Bottom-up approach We believe investors spend too much time worrying about top-down, macroeconomic considerations which are highly unpredictable and outwith their control. We are bottom-up stock pickers and approach investing with the view to become a long-term owner in a select number of fundamentally attractive businesses. We devote our time and energy to gaining a deep understanding of what drives success in business in general, and in the case of specific companies. We seek out differentiated sources of information to enable ustogain differentiated insights. The Strategic report, which includes pages 7 to 48 and incorporates the Chairman’s statement, has been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. Strategic report 07 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Chairman’s statement Introduction This is the first year of reporting since the introduction of the four-year performance- related tender offer. The broad rationale for this was set out in last year’s Annual Report by my predecessor as Chairman. The conditional tender clearly encapsulates the Board’s expectations of our Manager: we believe in Baillie Gifford’s ability to identify and build a portfolio of companies with long-term growth potential. We recognise successful active investment requires patience and the willingness to be different, but equally, we recognise that all active managers have ultimately to outperform benchmarks. Performance is discussed in greater depth below and in the Manager’s Report, however, there are signs, particularly in the second half of the year, that performance is improving. While broader indices have benefited from a narrow concentration of performance in a few large companies, the Company’s portfolio continues to reflect Baillie Gifford’s conviction in long-term, fundamental growth opportunities across the continent. The Managers remain focused on investing in exceptional businesses that can compound value over many years, even if this approach, at times, leads to periods of underperformance. During the year, the Board has with the Managers, looked at process around portfolio construction and the Board is encouraged by the resilience of the portfolio companies and by signs of improving operational performance across several core holdings. David Barron Chairman Appointed to the Board in 2023 and as Chairman in 2025 Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 08 We set out below the performance of the Company since the significant macro shift referred to above. For the sake of clear presentation, we take these from 1 October 2022. NAV Share Price Benchmark * 1 October 2022 – 30 September 2023 8.3% 8.6% 20.5% 1 October 2023 – 30 September 2024 12.1% 9.3% 15.3% 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2025 5.5% 14.5% 15.5% It is encouraging that performance improved in the second half of this reporting year. In addition, as set out on page 30 of this Annual Report in the discussion on Key Performance Indicators, the Board considers peer group comparative performance and over shorter periods, this too is more competitive. Private Companies During the year, the Board has spent significant time with the Fund Managers and Baillie Gifford’s Private Companies team, in order to re-assess the rationale for the Company to hold unquoted businesses within a largely listed portfolio. The Board concluded, following these most recent discussions, that limited exposure to private companies can provide access to distinct growth opportunities and a source of differentiated returns. Despite the significant setback in two investments, Baillie Gifford’s network, expertise and resources position them to successfully identify, execute and manage such opportunities. Private companies can be harder to realise and may be viewed as complex. However, as a long- term vehicle with structural advantages, we would not wish to exclude this area of the market if that is where the Managers believe they can add significant value. The investment made in Tekever this year was the first new private investment since 2023. Asat the year-end, unquoted companies represented 13.6% of the portfolio, driven in large part by the performance of Bending Spoons, that the Managers highlight in their report. The Board believes that good outcomes can be achieved by using the advantages of the investment trust structure: gearing, a meaningful exposure to unlisted companies and a willingness to diverge from the benchmark. Our active share is over 80% and the turnover is 22.8%. Notwithstanding the difficult performance record of recent years, we continue to encourage the Managers to remain consistent in their approach and to invest with conviction in companies they believe are positioned to outperform. Performance The net asset value per share (‘NAV’) total return over the Company’s financial year was 5.5% compared to a total return of 15.5% for the FTSE Europe ex UK Index, in sterling terms. In the second half of the year the NAV total return was 12.6% compared to a total return of 11.6% for the index. The share price total return over the year was 14.5% and so the discount to NAV of the Company’s shares narrowed from 15.7% to 8.6%. NAV Share Price Benchmark * 1 October 2024 – 31March 2025 (6.7%) 1.3% 3.5% 1 April 2025 – 30September 2025 12.6% 13.0% 11.6% Since Baillie Gifford began managing the portfolio in November 2019, the NAV total return has been 28.5% compared to a total return of 66.2% for the FTSE Europe ex UK Index, in sterling terms. The share price total return has been 27.8%, with the discount widening slightly from 7.5% to 8.6%. The Manager and the Board are focused on re-building the performance record going forward. In 2019, following Baillie Gifford’s appointment as Managers, macro conditions were initially uniquely favourable to Baillie Gifford’s style. The subsequent macro environment presented significant challenges to performance, amplified by certain stock-specific developments and portfolio allocation decisions. Since 2022, the Company has been operating against a very different market environment where the backdrop for growth companies has been far less universally supportive. * The benchmark is the FTSE Europe ex UK Index, in sterling terms. Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 114. All figures are stated on a total return basis. Total return and discount are an alternative performance measures – see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. 09 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Earnings and Dividend Revenue per share for the year was 0.78p (0.72p 2024) and the Board is recommending a final dividend of 0.72p per share (0.60p 2024). Subject to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting, the dividend will be paid on 13 February 2026 to shareholders on the register on 9 January 2026. Theex-dividend date will be 8 January 2026. As noted in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report, any dividend paid will be by way of a final dividend and be the minimum required for the Company to maintain its investment trust status. Borrowings The Company has two €30 million long-term debt facilities: the first has a remaining duration of 15years and is priced at a fixed rate of 1.57% and the other has over 10 years outstanding at a fixed rate of 1.55%. The Company also has an undrawn €30million overdraft facility with The Northern Trust Company, which at present is capped at €15million following Board agreement. At the year end, the Company had net gearing of 14.0% of shareholders’funds. Share Buybacks, Issuance and Discount As well as a focus on re-building the Company’s performance track record, the Board is very aware of the rating at which the shares of the Company trade. Over the course of the Company’s financial year, the share price moved from a 15.7% discount to NAV to a 8.6% discount to NAV. During this period, the Company bought back 27,060,412 shares at a total cost of approximately £26.9m. This represents approximately 7.7% of the issued share capital at the start of the year. By way of comparison, the equivalent figure last was 6.3m shares or 1.8% of the Company’s issued share capital. The shares repurchased by the Company are held in treasury and are available to be reissued, at a premium, when market conditions allow. The Board will continue to operate its buyback policy whilst ensuring that the integrity of the closed-ended structure, that we believe has significant advantage, is preserved. The Company is capitalised at over £330m and has a gross portfolio of over £400m. The shrinkage through buybacks does not unduly impact our competitive expense ratio of 0.66%. The competition for investor attention amongst funds and investment trusts has never been greater. Investment trusts need to remain relevant. We believe by having a distinctive investment approach and by utilising the structural advantages of an investment trust, we can deliver the investment performance and returns that underpin success and lead to greater demand for the Company’s shares. The Board is of the view that the Company should retain the power to buy back shares during the year and so, at the Annual General Meeting, is seeking to renew the annual authority to repurchase up to 14.99% of the shares in the Company in issue. When buying back shares, the Board does not have a formal discount target and is prepared to buy back shares opportunistically and where it is accretive toNAV. The Company also has authority to issue new shares and to reissue any shares held in treasury for cash on a non-pre-emptive basis. Shares are issued/reissued only at a premium to net asset value, thereby enhancing net asset value per share for existing shareholders. The Directors are, once again, seeking 10% share issuance authority at the Annual General Meeting. As with the buy back, this authority would expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2027. Annual General Meeting The AGM will be held at 2.00pm on 4 February 2026 at One Moorgate Place, City of London EC2R 6EA. Please see pages 103 to 108 that sets out the AGM location and directions thereto. The Managers will make a presentation and I look forward to meeting shareholders who are able to attend. To accurately reflect the views of shareholders of the Company, the Board intends to hold the AGM voting on a poll, rather than by a show of hands. This will ensure an exact and definitive result. The Board encourages all shareholders to exercise their votes on the AGM resolutions by completing and submitting the form of proxy enclosed with the Annual Report to ensure that your votes are represented at the meeting (whether or not you intend to attend in person). Ifyouhold shares through a share platform or other nominee, the Boardencourages you to contact these organisations directly as soon as possible to arrange for you to submit votes in Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 10 advance of the AGM. Alternatively,theAssociation of Investment Companies’ (‘AIC’) website theaic.co.uk/how-to-vote-your-shares has information on how to vote your shares if you hold them via one of the major platforms. The following link will also take you through to the AIC website where there is information on how your platform can help you attend the AGM in person theaic.co.uk/aic/ready-to-invest/ shareholdervoting/attending-an-agm. Should shareholders have questions for the Board or the Managers or any queries as to how to vote, they are welcome, as always, to submit them by email to enquiries@bailliegifford.com or call 0800 917 2113. Information on the resolutions can be found on pages 55 and 56 of the Annual Report and Financial Statements. The Directors consider that all resolutions to be put to shareholders are in their and the Company’s best interests as a whole and recommend that shareholders vote in their favour. Outlook Even though the macro backdrop against which we invest is unpredictable, we believe the Managers are well-placed to identify dynamic, growing European businesses that can prosper over the long-term in industries where management can shape the destiny of the business. Baillie Gifford’s approach is avowedly long-term, patient and different from many of the competition. With good execution, the Board believes this is a sound basis for successful active portfolio management. During the year, the Managers have improved the quality and breadth of the portfolio whilst remaining consistent to this approach. Many of the companies we own are delivering strong operating performance and excellent results, growing at attractive rates. This gives us confidence that early signs of performance improvement during the second half ofthe year can be continued into next year. David Barron Chairman 8December 2025 11 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Managers’ report For a definition of terms see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Over the past financial year, the Company’s net asset value (NAV) total return was 5.5%, compared with a 15.5% return from the FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms). All of the relative underperformance occurred in the first half of the year, as discussed in the Interim Report. While this outcome was disappointing, it was encouraging that both NAV and share price total returns outperformed the index in the second half of the year, by 1% and 1.4% respectively. This improvement reflects the steps taken to reposition the portfolio and to broaden the range of growth companies we invest in. Recent results have also benefited from improving momentum, particularly among our private holdings such as Bending Spoons. Although the environment has been challenging for growth investing – the European growth index has underperformed its value counterpart for five years – these results strengthen our conviction in the portfolio’s underlying quality and our belief that performance should continue to recover as market conditions evolve. The macroeconomic outlook for Europe is improving, and valuations seem to us to be very attractive. In the absence of inflation or interest rate shocks, we would expect that the share prices of our portfolio companies will revert to following fundamentals. We also expect that these companies will continue to increase sales and profits faster than the average company in Europe, giving us confidence that we are moving past the trough of our performance cycle. Stephen Paice Investment Manager Chris Davies Investment Manager Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 12 Market Environment and Positioning If the pain trade in the US has been not owning the “Magnificent Seven” tech companies, in Europe it has been not owning Banks, and to a lesser extent, defence companies. Banks have benefitted from higher interest rates while defence companies have benefitted from a renewed focus on geopolitical safety. As domestic sectors, both have been seen as safe havens from those seeking to avoid the uncertainty of Trump’s tariffs. We do own Tekever, a Portuguese Drone company, that should benefit from NATO’s pledge to spend up to 5% of GDP on defence and also the increasing role of unmanned systems in modern warfare. However, we currently hold no European banks and continue to believe that, in aggregate, the sector offers limited long- term opportunity. Many European banks are structurally disadvantaged and trade at premium valuations that do not, in our view, reflect their longer-term challenges. Volatility spiked in April after President Trump announced broad new tariffs on his wryly named ‘Liberation Day’. Although the most punitive proposals were later moderated, the episode reignited concerns about trade, inflation, and global growth. Risk appetite cooled, corporate guidance turned cautious, and capital flowed into the perceived safety of Europe’s domestic companies. Meanwhile, the excitement around artificial intelligence (AI) that buoyed parts of the US market failed to generate a comparable lift in Europe. For bottom-up growth investors, this confluence – a benchmark led by sectors we choose not to own, cyclical softness across industry, and a market bias toward immediate evidence – formed an unfavourable backdrop. There has been no ‘Liberation Day’ for European growth portfolios. Nonetheless, our philosophy remains unchanged. We aim to back exceptional businesses with enduring advantages and the capacity to compound value over years rather than months. The portfolio is not managed to mirror the index. We accept that there will be phases when other styles are rewarded. Historically, our strongest long-term outcomes have often followed periods when we were most out of step with prevailing fashion, precisely when patience and conviction are scarcest. Looking ahead, we remain encouraged by the structural forces supporting European growth. Digitalisation and AI continue to reshape industries from media to financial services. It is no coincidence that our five largest holdings – Bending Spoons, Prosus, Topicus.com, ASML, and Adyen – are all technology companies that stand to benefit directly from these transformative trends. While most businesses will gain from these advances, these firms should see their competitive moats widen and profitability improve more than most. The energy transition is also catalysing innovation in materials, logistics, and industrial processes, while healthcare is being transformed by data-rich diagnostics and targeted therapies. In private markets, a growing 5 year Cumulative Total Return MSCI Europe ex UK Growth vs Value Sep-20 Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 Sep-21 Dec-21 Mar-22 Jun-22 Sep-22 Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23 Sep-23 Dec-23 Mar-24 Jun-24 Sep-24 Dec-24 Mar-25 Jun-25 Sep-25 -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Cumulative Total Return (GBP) ● MSCI Europe ex UK Growth ● MSCI Europe ex UK Value Source: Factset. The chart compares the MSCI Europe ex UK indices rather than the FTSE Europe ex UK Index (which is the Company’s benchmark). 13 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc cohort of founder-led European companies is building valuable franchises away from public market scrutiny. Much of tomorrow’s leadership is being forged today, often behind closed doors, and we intend to be constructive, long-term partners in that process. In our view, it is only a matter of time before innovation and structural growth are rewarded again. Performance Review Several holdings delivered strong operational progress that translated into meaningful valuation gains over the period. The standout performer was Bending Spoons, our largest private holding, which generated a 258% return and now represents approximately 10% of NAV. We also saw strong performance from other holdings, including Spotify, Ryanair, and Prosus. Spotlight on Bending Spoons Highlighting the largest and best-performing company in any portfolio always carries some risk if things don’t go as expected. But we believe in being transparent, and since we view Bending Spoons as a truly special business, we think it is a risk worth taking. This Milan-based technology company has become one of Europe’s most accomplished software operators. Founded in 2013 by Luca Ferrari and four friends, it acquires and operates digital products, from mobile apps and SaaS platforms to subscription tools, underpinned by a proprietary, data-driven operating model. The company’s success rests on two interlocking pillars. The first is its disciplined acquisition strategy. It typically makes just a few sizeable acquisitions each year, which are integrated into a central technology stack powered by internal AI systems that automate analytics, monetisation, and parts of product engineering. This unlocks pricing power, and when combined with a rigorous approach to efficiency, acquired businesses become much more profitable with remarkable speed. These profits can then be redeployed in further acquisitions, thus driving a flywheel. The second pillar is its distinctive culture, defined by talent density, radical candour, and relentless optimisation. Recruitment is exceptionally selective: more than 600,000 applicants competed for fewer than 300 roles last year, with only the most capable joining what Ferrari calls the “A-team”. Ithasbecome one of the most coveted destinations in European technology. The ambition is simple and clear: to keep doing the same things, but better, compounding their advantage year after year. Execution has been exceptional. Returns on acquisitions have been consistently high, reflecting both the firm’s technology-enabled operating model and its ability to attract world-class talent. Unlike conventional software roll-ups, Bending Spoons focuses on fewer, larger acquisitions where post- transaction transformation is meaningful. Ferrari epitomises the firm’s ethos – engineering-led, transparent, and humble – and remains aligned, along with the other founders, with a significant stake in the business. In our view, Bending Spoons demonstrates that Europe can build globally relevant, highly profitable technology franchises outside public markets. It is also important to note that our recent internal review supports our belief that the company could be worth a lot more in the future despite its positive contribution to returns so far. Other Positive Contributors Spotify, the world’s largest audio-streaming platform now serving roughly 700 million monthly users, continued to exceed expectations. Management’s focus on operational efficiency and measured price increases helped lift margins. Even though most of us now have higher monthly subscription fees, user churn was minimal which is a great indication of continued willingness-to-pay. The investment case remains anchored in scale advantages, rapid product innovation, and the optionality of new verticals within audio and subscription services. Ryanair also delivered an impressive year as travel demand across Europe remained resilient. In the June quarter alone, the airline reported a net profit of €820 million, with average fares up 21% and unit costs rising just 1%. Its enduring cost leadership, prudent capacity management, and well-timed fuel hedging delivered record profitability, while the balance sheet remained rock-solid with net cash of around €2 billion. Ryanair’s operational rigour and disciplined capital allocation continue to set the benchmark in the industry, and like Spotify, we would expect pricing to be a key driver of increased profits from here. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 14 Prosus, the global consumer internet investor, was another important contributor. After years of market fixation on its Tencent stake, the company’s non-Tencent e-commerce portfolio achieved a significant milestone in generating positive free cash flow for the first time. Profitability improved across online classifieds, payments, and food delivery, and new CEO Fabricio Bloisi articulated credible medium-term goals, including a doubling of e-commerce revenues by 2028. Share buybacks also continued, which are aimed at further narrowing the discount to NAV. Tencent, the largest social media platform in China and the largest gaming company in the world, will still drive most of the performance from here, but it is encouraging to see the rest of Prosus’ portfolio starting to contribute positively. These three companies have been in the portfolio since we started managing it in 2019. While operating in very different industries, they share some common characteristics: they are managed by extremely ambitious entrepreneurs that have meaningful levels of ownership, they have dominant market shares, their customers value their products and services (yes, even Ryanair!), and they are now at the stage of being able to monetise years of investment. It has not been plain sailing though. These companies have also suffered from periods of share price weakness and volatility. However, by remaining patient and focusing on their fundamentals, we’ve been able to benefit from improving momentum. This is what we expect to see from many more companies in the portfolio in the coming years. Negative Contributors Not all holdings advanced in tandem. Several otherwise strong businesses faced cyclical headwinds or valuation pressures, leading to weaker share price performance. Hypoport, the German fintech platform for mortgage brokerage, was the largest detractor. The domestic housing market remained subdued following the sharp rise in interest rates and sentiment towards the sector has been understandably cautious. While Hypoport’s earnings began to recover in 2025, its recovery was temporarily held back by lower activity at one of its customers who had to deal with some IT issues. From here though, we expect the housing market to rebound, and for Hypoport to continue winning market share. IMCD, the specialty chemicals distributor, also experienced a temporary slowdown. After years of exceptional growth, customer destocking weighed on demand, leading to only 2% organic revenue growth in the first half of 2025 and mild margin compression. In a normal environment it should be able to grow organically around 5% and also add the same on again from acquisitions given its position as the natural consolidator in the industry. For this type of growth profile, the decade-low valuation multiple strikes us as extremely goodvalue. Soitec, the French producer of engineered semiconductor substrates, underperformed as its core markets – smartphones, automotive, and internet of things (IoT) – softened. The company’s recovery will depend on a broader cyclical upturn, however the CEO has recently resigned and following another profit warning, the investment case is under review. Novo Nordisk detracted following two profit warnings, driven by supply constraints and heightened competition from Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro/ Zepbound. Margin-dilutive exclusivity deals and leadership turnover compounded investor unease. Yet the fundamental picture remains robust: Novo supplies over 60% of global GLP-1 volumes, demand is rising rapidly, and its data continue to reinforce a clear clinical and commercial edge. The company’s significant investment programme should alleviate supply bottlenecks and support future growth. Despite near-term headwinds, Novo remains a cornerstone European growth company with pricing power, strong margins, and a long runway forexpansion. While the Company’s one-year results remain disappointing relative to the benchmark, we are encouraged by evidence of operational progress across much of the portfolio. The relative shortfall largely reflects our deliberate underweight exposure to sectors – such as banks and energy – that have limited alignment with our growth criteria. We continue to focus on building a distinctive, long-term portfolio of European growth businesses, guided by fundamentals rather than fashion. The tangible improvements seen at companies such as Spotify and Prosus provide a solid foundation for future returns. Periods like this test conviction, but we remain steadfast in our belief that enduring company fundamentals, not short-term rotations, drive sustainable shareholder value. 15 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Portfolio Activity Portfolio turnover remained high in the second half of the financial year as we identified new opportunities and rebalanced towards holdings with greater resilience and growth potential. This is most evident in our relative sector positioning versus the index shown below. A year ago, we were nearly 9% overweight in Industrials and 7% underweight in Health Care. Today, our exposure to Industrials is closer to neutral, while Health Care has moved to a 2% overweight. To be clear, these changes primarily reflect where we have found the most attractive companies trading at the most mispriced valuations. Relative Sector Bets vs Index ● 2024 Relative Weight ● 2025 Relative Weight -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Technology Industrials Consumer Discretionary Real Estate Basic Materials Telecoms Energy Utilities Consumer Staples Health Care Financials Source: Baillie Gifford / FTSE. The chart shows the relative weights vs FTSE Europe ex UK. We initiated positions in five companies – Grupa Kęty, Amplifon, Roche, Sandoz, and Tekever – spanning industrials, healthcare, and defence technology. Each shares the defining characteristics we seek: underappreciated growth, strong and improving competitive advantages, disciplined management, and attractive entry valuations. Grupa Kęty is a leading producer of aluminium products and packaging. The company has demonstrated a decade-long record of profitable growth, delivering approximately 13% annual sales growth and 17% operating profit growth while maintaining consistently high returns on capital. Its ongoing reinvestment programme continues to shift the business mix toward higher-value segments. Grupa Kęty also pursues selective acquisitions to enhance its capabilities. Despite these strengths, it remains under-researched outside its domestic market. We were able to establish a position at what we judged to be an undemanding valuation, one that did not fully reflect the company’s quality or long-term prospects. We believe steady demand in construction and automotive, combined with product-mix improvements, will support attractive compounding returns. Amplifon is the world’s largest hearing-care retailer, operating through more than 10,000 points of sale. Growth has slowed in recent years due to an unfavourable product cycle, prompting a sharp pullback in the valuation. We viewed this as a temporary dislocation rather than structural weakness. As the upgrade cycle resumes and the company continues to consolidate a fragmented market, we expect both growth and margins to recover. Demographic tailwinds, notably ageing populations and greater awareness of hearing health, underpin a compelling long-term demand profile. Amplifon’s scale, brand strength, and cash generation give it both the resilience and flexibility to capitalise on these trends. Roche is one of the world’s leading global pharmaceutical companies. It generates more than €10 billion in free cash flow annually and has been investing consistently in an innovation-led pipeline spanning oncology, immunology, and other key therapeutic areas. While recent years brought pipeline setbacks and patent expiries, we believe the outlook is improving as the company continues to revitalise. Management has tightened research discipline and is deploying computational AI tools more extensively in drug discovery and development. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 16 Roche is also entering new therapeutic areas, including obesity, hypertension and Alzheimer’s, with multiple launches expected before 2030. We see the market as undervaluing the breadth and quality of Roche’s pipeline, as well as its capital-allocationacumen. Sandoz, which spun-out of Novartis in 2023, is one of the world’s largest generics and biosimilars companies. The business is transitioning toward higher-margin products, notably biosimilars, which are expected to drive most of its future growth. A$400bn patent cliff in biologics provides a long runway for opportunity. We believe Sandoz’s pipeline, scale, and partnerships position it well to gain share. With a low valuation multiple, it offers a rare blend of defensiveness, cash generation, and underappreciated growth. We participated in a funding round for Tekever, aprivate European defence-technology company specialising in AI-enabled unmanned aerial systems used in maritime surveillance, border security, and other mission-critical applications. Its technology is deployed by agencies such as the European Maritime Safety Agency and the UK Home Office, and has been used in active conflict zones including Ukraine. After two decades of disciplined development, the company raised €70 million to scale production, in a round led by Baillie Gifford alongside the NATO Innovation Fund. Rising European defence spending and the growing strategic importance of autonomous intelligence and surveillance systems constitute durable tailwinds. Tekever’s established customer relationships and technical maturity provide a credible path to scaling and maintaining its very healthy level of profitability. Sources of Funds To fund these new investments, we sold three holdings: VNV Global, Genmab, and Beijer Ref. Limited transparency made assessment of VNV’s underlying progress challenging, prompting a redeployment of capital into companies where we have clearer operational insight. We also divested Genmab, the Danish biotech. While it remains a leader in antibody therapeutics, its revenue concentration in a few blockbuster collaborations, notably Darzalex, presented an asymmetric risk profile given the upcoming patent expiration. Unfortunately, its next generation Darzalex doesn’t look like it will be as successful as we originally thought. We redeployed proceeds into Roche, which offers broader exposure to healthcare innovation at an appealing valuation. Finally, we exited Beijer Ref, the Swedish distributor of cooling systems. Following several years of strong expansion and early signs of demand recovery, the valuation had, in our view, already priced in much of the cyclical upswing. We saw better risk-reward potential in holdings where an inflection in growth was less fully reflected in expectations. Investing in Private Companies Our private holdings, once a drag on performance, became the main driver of returns this year, delivering an exceptional 92% gain led by Bending Spoons’ 258% rise. With an average weight of 9.3%, private investments accounted for nearly all of the Company’s positive NAV movement. Since 2019, they have generated a cumulative return of 141%, even after writing down Northvolt and McMakler to zero, outperforming both peers and our listed portfolio. As is typical in private markets, a few exceptional successes drive most of the returns. Of six investments made so far, one has been outstanding, several are progressing, and two have disappointed. This asymmetry is intrinsic to private investing: a small number of winners can more than offset occasional losses. At year end, our four private holdings – Bending Spoons (10% of NAV), sennder (2.9%), Tekever (1.5%), and Flix (1.2%) – together represented 15.5% of net assets. Although our mandate allows up to 20% in privates, this is a ceiling, not a target. We invest selectively, deploying capital only where opportunity, valuation, and risk adjusted return align. Lessons from earlier experiences, particularly Northvolt, have strengthened our process. We are much more mindful of the time it takes to generate positive cashflow and the levels of capital intensity. Encouragingly, Bending Spoons and Tekever are already profitable, sennder and Flix are approaching breakeven, and they are all relatively asset light. Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 17 Our commitment to private investing reflects a broader conviction: Europe’s most promising growth companies increasingly remain private for longer, with value creation front loaded before IPO. These founder led, asset light businesses stand apart from capital intensive incumbents, offering compelling opportunity for patient investors. Our closed ended structure and permanent capital allow us to embrace this long term horizon, free from redemption pressures. As a crossover investor, we can hopefully identify exceptional companies early, back them through late stage rounds, and continue supporting them post IPO. Outlook The year highlighted a clear divide within the portfolio: businesses capable of self-generated growth through pricing power, innovation, or scale – such as Spotify and Ryanair – versus those temporarily constrained by cyclical headwinds in housing, industrial demand, or inventory cycles. As long-term investors, we view such divergences as a natural part long-term and patient investing. By backing structural growth rather than chasing short-term trends, there will inevitably be periods when relative performance lags a value-drivenbenchmark. Our focus remains firmly on fundamentals. Across much of the portfolio, we see rising margins, robust cash generation, and evidence of market-share gains. These are indicators of intrinsic value creation that, over time, should translate into stronger returns. While macroeconomic headwinds from inflation and geopolitics persist, the outlook appears incrementally more stable. We do not manage to macro forecasts, but we do consider scenarios carefully, favouring companies with the capacity to adapt across them. Our task is unchanged: to maintain a high-quality portfolio of European growth businesses capable of compounding over the long term. With a broader range of less correlated growth companies, the renewed momentum in our private portfolio, and the operational progress evident across key holdings, we believe the Company is well positioned to deliver attractive long-term returns. We thank our shareholders for their continued support and look forward to the year ahead with both determination and optimism. Stephen Paice Chris Davies Baillie Gifford 8 December 2025 Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 18 Review of investments The Company’s ten largest investments as at 30September 2025 Bending Spoons  Bending Spoons is a developer and acquirer of digital consumer applications. The company leverages its shared set of tools to use across different applications, with the shared goal of maximising long-term value creation while simultaneously minimising customer acquisition cost and improving the product for consumers. Scaling its current suite of applications and strategically acquiring new ones will be the key enabler of its continuedsuccess. Prosus A global consumer technology holding company that listed in Europe in 2019. Its biggest and most important asset is a stake in Tencent, the founder-run, Chinese social media and gaming giant. With over 1.3bn monthly users and an undermonetised platform, there are ample opportunities for continued profitable growth. We think Tencent is mispriced, and as Prosus trades at a significant discount to the value of its assets, we think it’s even moremispriced. Geography Italy Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 35,298 % of net assets at 30September 2025 10.0 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) 9,862 % of net assets at 30September 2024 2.7 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) – Absolute performance (%) * 257.9 Geography Netherlands Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 20,237 % of net assets at 30September 2025 5.7 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) 23,328 % of net assets at 30September 2024 6.4 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) (10,349) Absolute performance (%) * 60.1 * Absolute performance (in sterling terms) has been calculated on a total return basis over the period 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025. For the definition of total return see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. 19 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Topicus.com A serial acquirer in the vertical market software space, buying niche software companies in the highly fragmented European market. Internal cash generation is strong thanks to the mission critical nature of the software and customer stickiness, which leads to pricing power. This and the presence of parent company and major shareholder Constellation Software – from which Topicus.com was spun out in early 2021 – increase the odds of smart capital allocation and value creation for many years to come. ASML Makes lithography machines vital for the manufacture of semiconductor chips. It is a crucial enabler of Moore’s Law and has an especially strong lead in the most technologically advanced extreme ultraviolet lithography machines where it enjoys monopoly status. Demand for smaller and more computationally powerful chips continues to grow strongly with multiple drivers ranging from artificial intelligence to internet of things applications. This will require more capital expenditure from semiconductor fabs, resulting in a highly favourable growth outlook. Adyen Adyen is a global payments processing business, founded and listed in the Netherlands. It solves complexity in the payments stack, allowing merchants to accept online and in-person payments faster and cheaper. It has grown rapidly in recent years, securing business from major customers like Shopify and McDonald’s. We expect that growth to continue for many years to come given that it has barely penetrated its addressable market. © (ASML) All Rights Reserved Geography Netherlands Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 17,016 % of net assets at 30September 2025 4.8 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) 21,090 % of net assets at 30September 2024 5.8 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) (8,137) Absolute performance (%) * 13.7 Geography Netherlands Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 16,826 % of net assets at 30September 2025 4.8 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) 15,666 % of net assets at 30September 2024 4.3 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) (966) Absolute performance (%) * 1 7. 7 Geography Netherlands Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 14,688 % of net assets at 30September 2025 4.2 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) 15,294 % of net assets at 30September 2024 4.2 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) (930) Absolute performance (%) * 2.0 * Absolute performance (in sterling terms) has been calculated on a total return basis over the period 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025. For the definition of total return see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 20 Allegro.eu Poland’s dominant ecommerce platform. Online penetration of retail remains relatively low in Poland, and we believe Allegro will gain significant share as it continues to broaden its assortment and offers the best prices on the market. It recently acquired Mall Group, adding countries like Czechia and almost doubling its addressable market. Allegro’s position is driven by powerful network effects, and its ability to fight off competition has been well-demonstrated, even against almighty Amazon. EQT A Sweden-based but global private equity firm. Asset allocators are dedicating increasing portions of their portfolios to private assets. EQT is in a strong position to capture a large share of these flows given its global platform and impressive investment track record. Meanwhile, the company is seen as a ‘good owner’, improving the firms it acquires and is therefore more likely to appear as an acquirer ofchoice. Vend Marketplaces A collection of online classifieds marketplaces in the Nordics. Powerful network effects have led to its marketplaces, covering jobs, real estate, used cars and more, becoming dominant and hard to displace. This dominance should enable Vend Marketplaces to capture an increasing proportion of the transactions being made on its platforms, leading to growth from both pricing and volumes over the long-term. © Allegro Geography Poland Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 13,263 % of net assets at 30September 2025 3.7 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) 13,478 % of net assets at 30September 2024 3.7 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) (1,271) Absolute performance (%) * 7.7 Geography Sweden Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 12,986 % of net assets at 30September 2025 3.7 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) 9,748 % of net assets at 30September 2024 2.7 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 3,119 Absolute performance (%) * 1.9 Geography Norway Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£'000s) 12,335 % of net assets at 30September 2025 3.5 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£'000s) 17,971 % of net assets at 30September 2024 4.9 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£'000s) (6,272) Absolute performance ('%) 12.1 * Absolute performance (in sterling terms) has been calculated on a total return basis over the period 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025. For the definition of total return see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. 21 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Roche Holding Roche is a Swiss biopharmaceutical company. It is emerging from a period of pipeline setbacks with a refocused and reinvigorated drug portfolio. While consensus expectations are low, the company’s deep early- stage pipeline, which is the second largest in the industry with 36novel molecular entities, offers significant unappreciated upside. Flagship opportunities include Trontinemab, Roche’s next-generation Alzheimer’s therapy that leverages its proprietary BrainShuttle TM technology to cross the blood-brain barrier more effectively than peers. If successful, this drug could capture meaningful share in what may become a $10–20bn+ global market. Complementing its pharmaceutical strength is a diagnostics division with global scale and a potentially pivotal role in Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis and patient triage, anunderappreciated ecosystem advantage. Reply Reply is an IT consultancy, well positioned to capture long-term digital transformation trends, including cloud, IoT, and now, GenAI. Its decentralised model comprises 200+ autonomous subsidiaries organised by domain or technology (e.g., AWS, Azure), enabling agility and technological edge. These units operate with real-time P&Ls and are incentivised for profitability, fostering entrepreneurial innovation. Domain- specific expertise in GenAI is giving Reply a first-mover edge, evident in projects with Microsoft (Copilot), Stellantis, and Volkswagen. Reply is family-owned and operated with the Rizzante family deeply embedded in a technology-centric culture which prizes innovation should keep it durably successful. Geography Switzerland Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 12,333 % of net assets at 30September 2025 3.5 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) – % of net assets at 30September 2024 – Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 11,990 Absolute performance (%) * 2.5 Geography Italy Valuation at 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 12,072 % of net assets at 30September 2025 3.4 Valuation at 30 September 2024 (£’000s) 12,019 % of net assets at 30September 2024 3.3 Net purchases/(sales) in year to 30 September 2025 (£’000s) 955 Absolute performance (%) * (5.4) * Absolute performance (in sterling terms) has been calculated on a total return basis over the period 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025. For the definition of total return see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 22 One year summary The following information illustrates how Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust has performed over the year to 30September 2025. * Alternative performance measure – see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. † Key Performance Indicator. Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 114. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. 30 September 2025 30 September 2024 % change Shareholders’ funds (borrowings at book value) £353.9m £366.4m Net gearing 14% 13% Net asset value per ordinary share (borrowings at book value) 109.0p 104.2p 4.6% Net asset value per ordinary share (borrowings at fair value) 113.3p 108.0p 4.9% Share price 103.5p 91.0p 13.7% FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms) 12.0% Ongoing charges † 0.66% 0.65% Discount (with borrowings at book value) 5.0% 12.7% Discount (with borrowings at fair value) † 8.6% 15.7% Revenue earnings per ordinary share 0.78p 0.72p 8.3% Active share 86% 88% Dividends paid and payable in respect of the year 0.72p 0.60p 20.0% 23 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc * Alternative performance measure – see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. † Key performance indicator. Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 114. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Year to 30 September 2025 2024 Total return (%) Net asset value per ordinary share (borrowings at book value) 5.2% 14.5% Net asset value per ordinary share (borrowings at fair value) † 5.5% 12.1% Share price † 14.5% 9.3% FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms) 15.5% 15.3% Year to 30 September 2025 2025 2024 2024 Year’s high and low High Low High Low Net asset value per ordinary share (borrowings at bookvalue) 112.97p 87.71p 114.70p 83.24p Net asset value per ordinary share (borrowings at fairvalue) 117.19p 92.00p 118.28p 88.82p Share price 108.00p 83.20p 101.00p 75.40p Discount (borrowings at fairvalue) † (6.5%) ( 1 7. 2%) (10.8%) (15.8%) Year to 30 September 2025 2024 Net return per ordinary share Revenue return 0.78p 0.72p Capital return 4.03p 12.35p Total return 4.81p 13.07p Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 24 (Discount)/premium to NAV (figures plotted on a monthly basis) 20252020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Years to 30 September ● (Discount)/premium Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford. The (discount)/premium is the difference between Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust's quoted share price and its underlying net asset value per share expressed as a percentage of net asset value per share. (20%) (15%) 10% 5% 0% (10%) (5%) * See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. † With borrowings deducted at fair value. # The benchmark is the FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms). ‡ See disclaimer on page 114. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Five year total return performance (figures rebased to 100 at 30 September 2020, figures plotted on a monthly basis) 20252020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Cumulative to 30 September ● NAV † ● Share price ● Benchmark# Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers ‡ . Dividends are reinvested. 50 250 200 150 100 Five year summary The following charts indicate how an investment in BaillieGifford European GrowthTrust has performed relative to its benchmark andits underlying NAV overthefive year period to30September 2025. 25 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 20252021 2022 2023 2024 Years to 30 September ● NAV return † ● Share price return Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers ‡ . (40%) (30%) 10% 0% (10%) (20%) * See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. † With borrowings deducted at fair value. # The benchmark is the FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms). ‡ See disclaimer on page 114. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Annual NAV and share price total returns (relative to the benchmark # total returns) Annual NAV and share price total returns 2025 2021 2022 2023 2024 Years to 30 September ● NAV return † ● Share price return Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford and relevant underlying index providers ‡ . (60%) 40% 20% 0% (40%) (20%) ● Benchmark# Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 26 Ten year record Source: LSEG/Baillie Gifford. See disclaimer on page 114. * For a definition of terms see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. † Alternative performance measure # Total operating costs divided by average net asset value. Baillie Gifford & Co Limited was appointed on 29 November 2019 and agreed to waive its management fee for six months from the date of its appointment. Without the management fee waiver the ongoing charges ratio for the year to 30September 2020 would have been 0.66%. See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. ‡ FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms). ¶ Prior year figures restated for the ten for one share split on 1 February 2021. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. At 30 September 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Capital Total assets (£’000) 406,207 416,275 379,350 362,957 613,010 469,587 373,857 426,974 440,200 360,875 312,239 Borrowings (£’000) 52,291 49,844 51,960 52,560 51,471 16,939 – 12,655 – 10,216 – Shareholders’ funds (£’000) 353,916 366,431 327,390 310,397 561,539 452,648 373,857 414,319 440,200 350,659 312,239 NAV per share (book) (p) ¶ 109.0 104.2 91.4 86.5 154.0 125.0 92.9 100.4 104.8 83.4 74.2 NAV per share (fair) (p) † 113.3 108.0 96.7 91.9 154.5 125.0 92.9 100.4 104.8 83.4 74.2 Share price (p) ¶ 103.5 91.0 83.6 79.5 152.4 122.0 81.0 90.8 92.0 72.3 6 7. 3 Discount (book) (%) † 5.0 12.7 8.5 8.1 1.0 2.4 12.8 9.6 12.3 13.3 9.3 Discount (fair) (%) 8.6 15.7 13.6 13.5 1.3 2.4 12.8 9.6 12.3 13.4 9.3 Revenue Gross revenue (£’000) 4,063 4,013 3,912 4,313 3,256 2,597 14,523 13,775 12,591 10,357 9,540 Available for ordinary shareholders (£’000) 2,662 2,547 9,625 2,861 1,533 1,569 12,605 11,461 10,853 8,003 6,708 Revenue earnings per ordinary share (p) ¶ 0.8 0.7 2.7 0.8 0.4 0.4 3.1 2.7 2.6 1.9 1.6 Ordinary dividends paid and proposed per share ¶ 0.72 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 3.1 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.4 Special dividends per share (p) ¶ – – 2.2 – – – – – 0.1 0.6 0.2 Ongoing charges ratio (%) #† 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Gearing Net gearing (%) † 14.0 13.6 16.0 16.0 7. 0 4.0 0.0 3.0 – 3.0 – Gross gearing (%) † 14.8 14.1 16.0 17. 0 9.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 – 3.0 – Performance Total Returns NAV (borrowings at fair value) % change † 5.5 12.1 8.3 (40.4) 24.0 3 7. 5 (4.6) (2.1) 29.9 14.9 (5.5) Share price % change † 14.5 9.3 8.6 (47.7) 25.2 54.2 (7.6) 1.2 32.2 9.8 (8.3) Benchmark % change † 15.5 15.3 20.5 (15.3) 23.0 (0.3) 6.9 2.4 22.6 21.8 (1.8) 27 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Source: LSEG and underlying data providers. See disclaimer on page 114. * See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. † FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms). Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Cumulative performance (taking 2015 as 100) At 30 September Net asset value per share Net asset value total return Share price Share price total return Benchmark † Benchmark total return † Revenue earnings per ordinary share Dividends paid and proposed per ordinary share 2015 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2016 112 115 107 110 118 122 119 114 2017 141 149 137 145 140 149 161 150 2018 135 146 135 147 139 153 171 193 2019 125 139 120 136 143 163 194 221 2020 168 192 181 209 139 163 26 21 2021 207 238 226 262 167 200 26 21 2022 117 142 118 137 137 170 49 50 2023 123 153 124 149 161 204 168 29 2024 140 172 135 163 180 236 45 43 2025 147 181 154 186 201 272 49 51 Compound annual returns (%) 5 year (2.7) (1.1) (3.2) (2.3) 7. 6 10.8 13.3 19.1 10 year 3.9 6.1 4.4 6.4 7. 2 10.5 (6.9) (6.4) Cumulative to 30 September 2025 2015 2017 2020 2022 20242016 20192018 2021 2023 ● Share price total return * ● NAV total return * ● Benchmark total return † 0 350 300 150 100 50 250 200 Ten year total return performance * Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 28 Business model Business and status Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc (‘the Company’) is a public company limited by shares and is incorporated in England. The Company is an investment company within the meaning of section 833 of the Companies Act 2006 and carries on business as an investment trust. Investment trusts are UK public listed companies and their shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange. They invest in a portfolio of assets in order to spread risk. The Company has a fixed share capital although, subject to shareholder approval sought annually, it may purchase its own shares or issue shares. The price of the Company’s shares is determined, like other listed shares, by supply and demand. The Company has been approved as an investment trust by HMRevenue & Customs subject to the Company continuing to meet the eligibility conditions. The Directors are of the opinion that the Company has continued to conduct its affairs so as to enable it to comply with the ongoing requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) (Tax) Regulations 2011. The Company is an Alternative Investment Fund (‘AIF’) for the purposes of the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations. Investment objective To achieve capital growth over the long-term from adiversified portfolio of European securities. Investment policy The Company is invested in a diversified portfolio ofbetween 30 to 60 European companies. The Company may not invest more than 10% of totalassets in any one individual stock at the time ofinvestment. The Board recognises that investment in some European countries can be riskier than in others. Investment risks are diversified through holding a wide range of securities in different countries and industrial sectors. The Company has the ability to invest in securities that are listed in countries which are not included in the FTSE All-World European ex UK indices, where these securities have a meaningful connection with continental Europe. The Board has the authority to hedge the Company’s exposure to movements in the rate of exchange of currencies, principally the euro, in which the Company’s investments are denominated, against sterling, its reporting currency. Up to 20% of total assets, as measured at the time of initial investment, can be invested in unlisted investments. Business review 29 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc The level of gearing within the portfolio is agreed by the Board and the absolute amount of any gearing should not exceed 20% of net assets at time of drawdown, excluding any unlisted investments inthe calculation of net assets. No more than 10% of the total assets of the Company may be invested in other listed investment companies (including investment trusts) except in those that have stated that they will invest no more than 15% of their total assets in other listed investment companies. In this case, the limit is 15%. The Managers’ compliance with the limits set out in the investment policy is monitored by the Board and the Alternative Investment Fund Manager (‘AIFM’). Culture As an externally managed investment company with no employees, Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust’s culture is expressed through its Board and its third party service providers, in particular its Managers, in their interactions with shareholders and other stakeholders. The Board’s assessment of its own interactions is described in its Section 172 Statement on pages 37 to 39, and the Baillie Gifford statement on stewardship, which describes the Managers’ culture of constructive engagement, is set out on page 41. Borrowings At 30 September 2025 the Company had an uncommitted €30 million bank overdraft credit facility agreement with The Northern Trust Company for the purpose of pursuing its investment objective. At 30 September 2025, nil had been drawn down (2024 – nil). At 30 September 2025 the Company also had €30 million of long-term, fixed rate, senior, unsecured privately placed loan notes, with a fixed coupon of 1.57% to be repaid on 8 December 2040 and a further €30 million of long-term, fixed rate, senior, unsecured privately placed loan notes with a fixed coupon of 1.55% to be repaid on 24 June 2036. Further details of the Company’s borrowings are set out in note 12 on page 93. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 30 Performance At each Board meeting, the Directors consider a number of performance measures to assess the Company’s success in achieving its objectives. The performance measures below are to 30 September 2025. * Alternative performance measure – see Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. Baillie Gifford & Co was appointed on 29 November 2019. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Key performance indicators The Board uses key performance indicators (‘KPIs’) to measure the progress and performance of the Company over time when discharging its duties as set out on page 59. These KPIs are established industry measures. The one, five and ten year records of the KPIs can be found on pages22 to 27. Further discussion is included in the Chairman’s statement on pages 07 to 10. In addition to the above, the Board considers peer group comparative performance. Across these measures, the Board looks for relative outperformance over the long term, while remaining mindful that the nature of the Investment Policy and the growth characteristics of the portfolio investments may entail periods of underperformance over the short and medium term. Share price total return relativeto the benchmark * The total return is the return to shareholders after reinvesting the netdividend on the date that the share price goes ex-dividend. -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 ● Share price total return 1 year 5 years 10 yea rs 3 years -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 ● NAV total return 1 year 5 years 10 years 3 years Net asset value total return relative to the benchmark * The total return is the return to shareholders after reinvesting the netdividend on the date that the share price goes ex-dividend. Share price (discount)/premium * As stock markets and share prices vary, an investment trust’s share price is rarely the same as its NAV. When the share price is lower than the NAV it is said to be trading at a discount. If the share price is higher than the NAV, this situation is called a premium. -15 -10 -5 0 ● Average (discount)/premium of NAV to share price 1 year 5 years 10 years % 3 years Ongoing charges ratio * The ongoing charges ratio is the total recurring expenses (excluding the Company’s cost of dealing in investments and borrowing costs) incurred by the Company as a percentage of the daily average net asset value. Without the management fee waiver (see page 26) theongoing charges ratio for 2020 would have been 0.66%. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 ● Ongoing charges ratio % 2015 2025 31 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Viability statement Having regard to provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Directors have assessed the prospects of the Company over a five year period. The Directors continue to believe this period to be appropriate as it reflects the Company’s longer term investment strategy and to be a period during which, in the absence of any adverse change to the regulatory environment and to the tax treatment afforded to UK investment trusts, they do not expect there to be any significant change to the current principal risks facing the Company nor to the effectiveness of the controls employed to mitigate those risks. Notwithstanding the performance- related tender offer over the four years to 30September 2028 the Directors do not reasonably envisage any change in strategy or any events which would prevent the Company from operating over a period of five years. In considering the viability of the Company, the Directors have conducted a robust assessment of each of the principal and emerging risks and uncertainties detailed on pages 32 to 36, inparticular the impact of market risk where a significant fall in European equity markets would adversely impact the value of the investment portfolio. The Directors have also considered the Company’s leverage and liquidity in the context of the loan notes repayable in 2036 and 2040, the income and expenditure projections and the fact that the majority (86%) of the Company’s investments are readily realisable quoted equity securities which can be sold to meet its liabilities if necessary, the main liabilities currently being the loan notes. Specific leverage and liquidity stress testing was conducted during the year, including consideration of the risk of further market volatility resulting from increasing geopolitical tensions. The leverage stress testing identified the impact on leverage in scenarios where gross assets fall by 25% and 50%, reflecting a range of market conditions that may adversely impact the portfolio. The liquidity stress testing identified the reduction in the value of assets that can be liquidated within one month that would result in the value of those assets falling below the value of the borrowings. The stress testing did not indicate any matters of concern. In addition, all of the key operations required by the Company are outsourced to third party service providers and it is reasonably considered that alternative providers could be engaged at relatively short notice where necessary. Based on the Company’s processes for monitoring revenue projections and operating costs, share price discount/premium, the Managers’ compliance with the investment objective, asset allocation, the portfolio risk profile, leverage, counterparty exposure, liquidity risk, financial controls and the Managers’ operational resilience, the Directors have concluded that there is a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the next five years. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 32 Principal and emerging risks As explained on pages 62 and 63 there is an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the risks faced by the Company. The Directors have undertaken a robust assessment of the principal and emerging risks facing the Company, including those that would threaten the business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. A description of these risks and how they are being managed or mitigated is set out below: Investment strategy risk What is the risk? Pursuit of an investment strategy to fulfil the Company’s objective which the market perceives to be unattractive or inappropriate, or the ineffective implementation of an attractive or appropriate strategy, may lead to reduced returns for shareholders and, as a result, adecreased demand for the Company’s shares. This may lead to the Company’s shares trading at a widening discount to their net asset value. How is it managed? To mitigate this risk, the Board regularly reviews and monitors the Company’s objective and investment policy and strategy, the investment portfolio and its performance, the level of discount/premium to net asset value at which the shares trade and movements in the share register and raises any matters ofconcern with the Managers. Rating and change Current assessment of risk This risk is considered to have increased. The market appetite for growth investing is considered to have deteriorated. However, the discount has reduced from 15.7% to 8.6% during the year as the Company bought back 27,060,412 shares. Cyber security risk What is the risk? A cyber attack on Baillie Gifford’s network or that of a third party service provider could impact the confidentiality, integrity or availability of data and systems. Emerging technologies, including AI and quantum computing capabilities, may introduce new, and increase existing information security risks that impact operations. How is it managed? To mitigate this risk, the Audit Committee reviews Reports on Internal Controls published by Baillie Gifford and other third party service providers. Cyber security due diligence is performed by Baillie Gifford on third party service providers which includes a review of crisis management and business continuity frameworks. Rating and change Current assessment of risk This risk is seen as increasing due to the continuation of geopolitical tensions that could lead to more cyber attacks. Emerging technologies, including AI, could potentially increase information security risks. In addition, service providers operate a hybrid approach of remote and office working, thereby increasing the potential of acyber security threat. Political and associated economic risk What is the risk? Political change in areas in which the Company invests or may invest may have financial consequences for the Company. How is it managed? To mitigate this risk, developments are closely monitored and considered by the Board and areregularly discussed at Boardmeetings. Rating and change Current assessment of risk The prospect of market volatility remains, given continuing geopolitical instability. Decreasing RiskIncreasing Risk Stable Risk Moderate RiskHigh Risk Low Risk 33 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Financial risk What is the risk? The Company’s assets consist mainly of listed securities (86.4%of the investment portfolio) and its principal and emerging financial risks are therefore market related and include market risk (comprising currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk), liquidity risk and credit risk. An explanation of those risks and how they are managed is contained in note 19 to the Financial Statements on pages95 to 101. How is it managed? The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility due to macroeconomic factors such as higher inflation and interest rates and geopolitical concerns. In order to oversee this risk, the Board considers at each meeting various metrics including regional and industrial sector weightings, top and bottom stock contributors to performance along with sales and purchases of investments. Individual investments are discussed with the portfolio manager together with general views on the investment markets and sectors. A strategy session is held annually. Rating and change Current assessment of risk The prospect of market volatility remains, given continuing geopolitical instability. Private company investment risk What is the risk? The Company’s liquidity risk could be increased by its investment in private company securities. These assets may be more difficult to buy or sell, so changes in their prices may be greater than for listed investments and their valuations may be perceived to be more volatile or out of date. How is it managed? To mitigate this risk, the Board considers the private company securities in the context of the overall investment strategy and provides guidance to the Managers on the maximum exposure to private company securities. The investment policy limits the amount which may be invested in private company securities to 20% of the total assets of the Company, measured at the time of investment. The Managers have a robust valuation methodology, which is applied consistently. In periods of market volatility, the Managers’ Private Company Valuations Group will perform trigger analyses initial and, if appropriate, revalue the relevant investments. The valuations are subject to review and challenge by the Board every six months and are subject to scrutiny annually by the external Auditor. Rating and change Current assessment of risk One new private company was purchased during the period. At 30 September 2025, private company investments comprised 13.5% of total assets. Decreasing RiskIncreasing Risk Stable Risk Moderate RiskHigh Risk Low Risk Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 34 Climate and governance risk What is the risk? Perceived problems on environmental, social and governance (‘ESG’) matters in an investee company could lead to that company’s shares being less attractive to investors, adversely affecting its share price, in addition to potential valuation issues arising from any direct impact of the failure to address the ESG weakness on the operations or management of the investee company (for example in the event of an industrial accident or spillage). Repeated failure by the Managers to identify ESG weaknesses in investee companies could lead to the Company’s own shares being less attractive to investors, adversely affecting its own share price. How is it managed? This is mitigated by the Managers’ strong ESG stewardship and engagement policies which are available to view on the Managers’ website, bailliegifford.com/esg, and which have been reviewed and endorsed by the Company, and which have been fully integrated into the investment process. Due diligence includes assessment of the risks inherent in climate change (see page 64). Rating and change Current assessment of risk The Investment Manager continues to employ strong ESG stewardship and engagement policies. Discount risk What is the risk? The discount/premium at which the Company’s shares trade relative to its net asset value can change. The risk of a widening discount is that it may undermine investor confidence in the Company. How is it managed? To manage this risk, the Boardmonitors the level of discount/premium at which the shares trade and the Company has authority to buy back its existing shares, when deemed by the Board to be in the best interests of the Company and itsshareholders. Rating and change Current assessment of risk The Company’s shares traded at an average discount of 11.7% throughout the year and the discount at the year end was 8.6%. The Company bought back 27,060,412 ordinary shares during theyear. The Board has also put in place a performance- related tender offer as set out on page 7. Decreasing RiskIncreasing Risk Stable Risk Moderate RiskHigh Risk Low Risk 35 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Custody and depositary risk What is the risk? Safe custody of the Company’s assets may be compromised through control failures by the Depositary, including breaches of cyber security. How is it managed? To mitigate this risk, the Audit Committee receives six-monthly reports from the Depositary confirming safe custody of the Company’s assets held by the Custodian. Cash and portfolio holdings are independently reconciled to the Custodian’s records by the Managers who also agree uncertificated private portfolio holdings to confirmations from investee companies. The Custodian’s audited internal controls reports are reviewed by Baillie Gifford’s Business Risk Department and a summary of the key points is reported to the Audit Committee and any concerns investigated. In addition, the existence of assets is subject to annual external audit. Rating and change Current assessment of risk All control procedures are working effectively. Operational risk What is the risk? Failure of Baillie Gifford’s systems or those of other third party service providers could lead to an inability to provide accurate reporting and monitoring or a misappropriation of assets. How is it managed? To mitigate this risk, Baillie Gifford has a comprehensive business continuity plan which facilitates continued operation of the business in the event of a service disruption. The Audit Committee reviews Baillie Gifford’s Report on Internal Controls and reports by other key third party providers are reviewed by Baillie Gifford on behalf of the Board and a summary of the key points is reported to the Audit Committee and any concerns investigated. The other key third party service providers have not experienced significant operational difficulties affecting their respective services to the Company. Rating and change Current assessment of risk All control procedures are working effectively. Decreasing RiskIncreasing Risk Stable Risk Moderate RiskHigh Risk Low Risk Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 36 Leverage risk What is the risk? The Company may borrow money for investment purposes (sometimes known as ‘gearing’ or ‘leverage’). If the investments fall in value, any borrowings will magnify the extent of this loss. If borrowing facilities are not renewed, the Company may have to sell investments torepay borrowings. How is it managed? To mitigate this risk, all borrowings require the prior approval of the Board and leverage levels are discussed by the Board and Managers at every meeting. Covenant levels are monitored regularly. The majority of the Company’s investments are in quoted securities that are readily realisable. Further information on leverage can be found on page113 and the Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. Rating and change Current assessment of risk The Company has in place long term borrowings, expiring in 2036 and 2040. Regulatory risk What is the risk? Failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements such as the tax rules for investment trust companies, the UK Listing Rules and the Companies Act could lead to suspension of the Company’s Stock Exchange listing, financial penalties, a qualified audit report or the Company being subject to tax on capital gains. Changes to the regulatory environment could negatively impact the Company. How is it managed? To mitigate this risk, BaillieGifford’s Business Risk, Internal Audit and Compliance Departments provide regular reports to the Audit Committee on Baillie Gifford’s monitoring programmes. Major regulatory change could impose disproportionate compliance burdens on the Company. In such circumstances representation is made to ensure that the special circumstances of investment trusts are recognised. Shareholder documents and announcements, including the Company’s published Interim and Annual Report and Financial Statements, are subject to stringent review processes and procedures are in place to ensure adherence to the Transparency Directive and the Market Abuse Directive with reference to inside information. Rating and change Current assessment of risk All control procedures are working effectively. There have been no material regulatory changes that have impacted the Company during the year. Emerging risks As explained on pages 62 and 63, the Board has regular discussions on principal and emerging risks, including any risks which are not an immediate threat but could arise in the longer term. The Board considers emerging risks at each Board meeting and discusses any mitigations required. Decreasing RiskIncreasing Risk Stable Risk Moderate RiskHigh Risk Low Risk 37 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Promoting the success of the Company (section 172 statement) Under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006, the directors of a company must act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters and to the extent applicable) to: a) the likely consequences of any decision in the long term, b) the interests of the company’s employees, c) the need to foster the company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, d) the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment, e) the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and f) the need to act fairly as between members of the company. In this context, having regard to the Company being an externally-managed investment company with no employees, the Board considers the Company’s key stakeholders to be: its existing and potential new shareholders; its externally-appointed Managers and Secretaries (Baillie Gifford); other professional service providers (corporate broker, registrar, Auditors and depositary); lenders; wider society and the environment. The Board considers that the interests of the Company’s key stakeholders are aligned, in terms of wishing to see the Company deliver sustainable long-term growth, in line with the Company’s stated objective and strategy, and meet the highest standards of legal, regulatory, and commercial conduct, with the differences between stakeholders being merely a matter of emphasis on those elements. The Board’s methods for assessing the Company’s progress in the context of its stakeholders’ interests are set out below. Stakeholder Why we engage How we engage and what we do Shareholder Shareholders are, collectively, the Company’s owners: providing them with a return for their investment in accordance with the Company’s investment policy and objective is the reason for its existence. The Board places great importance on communication with shareholders. The Annual General Meeting provides an opportunity for the Board and Managers to present to shareholders on the Company’s performance, future plans and prospects. It also allows shareholders the opportunity to meet with the Board and Managers and raise questions and concerns. The Chairman and Senior Independent Director (‘SID’) are available to meet with shareholders as appropriate. The Managers meet regularly with shareholders and their representatives, reporting their views back to the Board. Directors also attend certain shareholder presentations, in order to gauge shareholder sentiment first hand. Shareholders may also communicate with members of the Board at any time by writing to them at the Company’s registered office or to the Company’s broker. These communication opportunities help inform the Board when considering how best to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of all shareholders over the long term. Baillie Gifford – Managers and Secretaries The Company’s Board has delegated the management of the Company’s portfolio, and the administration of the Company’s operations including fulfilment of regulatory and taxation reporting requirements, to Baillie Gifford. Baillie Gifford is therefore responsible for the substantial activities of the Company and has the most immediate influence on its conduct towards the other stakeholders, subject to the oversight and strategic direction provided by the Board. The Board seeks to engage with its Managers and Secretaries, and other service providers, in a collaborative and collegiate manner, encouraging open and constructive discussion and debate, while also ensuring that appropriate and regular challenge is brought and evaluation conducted. This approach aims to enhance service levels and strengthen relationships with the Company’s providers, with a view to ensuring the interests of the Company’s shareholders are best served by keeping cost levels proportionate and competitive, and by maintaining the highest standards of business conduct. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 38 Stakeholder Why we engage How we engage and what we do Portfolio companies As all of the Company’s operations are conducted by third party professional providers, it is the companies held in its investment portfolio which have the primary real-world impact in terms of social and environmental change, both positively and negatively, as well as generating, through their commercial success, the investment growth sought by the Company’s shareholders. The investee companies have an interest in understanding their shareholders’ investment rationale in order to assure themselves that long-term business strategies will be supported. The Board is cognisant of the need to consider the impact of the Company’s investment strategy and policy on wider society and the environment. The Board considers that its oversight of environmental, social and governance (‘ESG’) matters is an important part of its responsibility to all stakeholders. The Board’s review of the Managers includes an assessment of their ESG approach and its application in making investment decisions. The Board regularly reviews Governance Engagement reports, which document the Managers’ interactions with investee companies on ESG matters (see pages 42 to 44). Brokers The Company’s brokers provide an interface between the Company’s Board and its institutional shareholders. The Company’s brokers attend each Board meeting, and present a report at those meetings, in order to keep the Board apprised of shareholder and wider market sentiment regarding the Company. They also arrange forums for shareholders to meet the Chairman, or other Directors, outwith the normal general meeting cycle. Registrars The Company’s registrars provide an interface with those shareholders who hold the Company’s shares directly. The Company Secretaries liaise with the registrars to ensure the frequency and accuracy of communications to shareholders is appropriate, and monitor shareholder correspondence to ensure that the level of service provided by the registrars is acceptable. The Manager’s risk function reviews the registrars’ internal controls report and reports on the outcome of this review to the Audit Committee. Auditor The Company’s Auditor has a responsibility to provide an opinion on whether the Company’s Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, as set out in more detail in the Auditor’s Report to the members on page 75. The Company’s Auditor meets with the Audit Committee, in the absence of the Managers where deemed necessary, and the Managers undertake to provide all information requested by the Auditor in connection with the Company’s annual audit promptly and to ensure that it is complete and accurate in allrespects. Depositary andCustodian The Depositary is responsible for the safekeeping of the Company’s financial instruments, as set out in more detail on page54. The Depositary provides the Audit Committee with a report on its monitoring activities. The Board and Managers seek to engage with the Depositary and Custodian in a collaborative and collegiate manner, encouraging open and constructive discussion and debate, while also ensuring that appropriate and regular challenge is brought and evaluation conducted. This approach aims to enhance service levels and strengthen relationships with the Company’s providers, with a view to ensuring the interests of the Company’s shareholders are best served by keeping cost levels proportionate and competitive, and by maintaining the highest standards of business conduct. Lenders Lenders such as holders of debt instruments (debentures, bonds and private placement loan notes) and banks providing fixed or revolving credit facilities or overdrafts provide the Company’s gearing and have an interest in the Company’s ongoing financial health andviability. The Company’s legal advisers review all legal agreements in connection with the Company’s debt arrangements and advise the Board on the appropriateness of the terms and covenants therein. The Managers and Secretaries ensure that the frequency and accuracy of reporting on, for example, covenant certification, is appropriate and that correspondence from the lenders receives a prompt response. 39 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Stakeholder Why we engage How we engage and what we do AIC/industry peers The Association of Investment Companies (AIC) and the Company’s investment trust industry peers have an interest in the Company’s conduct and performance, asadverse market sentiment towards one investment trust can affect attitudes towards the wider industry. The Company is a member of the AIC, and the Directors and/ or the Managers and Secretaries (as appropriate) participate in technical reviews, requests for feedback on proposed legislation or regulatory developments, corporate governance discussions and/or training. Investment platforms Investment platforms provide an interface with shareholders who invest in the Companyindirectly. The Managers liaise with the various investment platforms on strategies for improving communications with the Company’s shareholders who hold their shares via these platforms. Up- to-date information about the Company, including monthly commentary, recent portfolio information, performance figures and an annual timetable of key dates is published on the Company’s website, for the ease of reference of suchshareholders. Wider society and the environment No entity, corporate or otherwise, can exist without having an influence on the society in which it operates or utilising the planet’s resources. Through its third-party relationships, as noted above, the Company seeks to be a positive influence and, in circumstances where that is not possible, to mitigate its negative impacts insofar as is possible. The Board and Managers’ interactions with the various stakeholders as noted above form the principal forms of direct engagement with wider society and in respect of the environment (commercial, financial, and in terms of planetary health and resources). The Board recognises the importance of maintaining the interests of the Company and its stakeholders, in aggregate, firmly front of mind in its key decision making and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, the Company Secretaries, are at all times available to the Board to ensure that suitable consideration is given to the range of factors to which the Directors should have regard. In addition to ensuring that the Company’s stated investment objective was being pursued, key decisions and actions during the year which have required the Directors to have regard to applicable section 172 factors include: • The Board’s decision to declare a final dividend of 0.60p per ordinary share for the year end 30September 2024, the minimum required forthe Company to maintain its investment trust status; • The buy back of 27,060,412 shares at a discount enhancing the NAV for continuing shareholders; • As noted in the Audit Committee Report on page65, two Audit Committees during the period were devoted to a review of the valuation of the Company’s private companies. In addition, the Board provided challenge during the year to the Managers regarding the rationale for the Company to hold private companies, their approach to investing in private companies and the valuation methodologies applied;and • The Board conducted meetings with shareholders during the year to seek their feedback and understand their views. During the year the Company hosted an Annual General Meeting providing shareholders with the opportunity to engage directly with the Board and the Managers. A Q&A session was held allowing shareholders to raise questions and receive detailed responses. The Board encourages shareholders to attend the Annual General Meeting in February 2026 (see the Notice of AGM on pages 103 to 108). The Board continues to utilise digital platforms, including the Company website to disseminate timely information and updates. The Board remains committed to maintaining regular, open and transparent communication with all shareholders. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 40 Employees, human rights andcommunityissues The Board recognises the requirement to provide information about employees, human rights and community issues. As the Company has no employees, all its Directors are non-executive and all its functions are outsourced, there are no disclosures to be made in respect of employees, human rights and community issues. Gender representation At 30 September 2025, the Board comprises four Directors, two male and two female. The Company has no employees. The Board’s policy on diversity is set out on pages 61 and 62. Environmental, social and governance policy Details of the Company’s policy on socially responsible investment can be found under Corporate governance and stewardship on page 64. The Company considers that it does not fall within the scope of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and it is not, therefore, obliged to make a slavery and human trafficking statement. In any event, the Company considers its supply chains to be of low risk as its suppliers are typically professional advisers. Astatement by the Managers under the Act has been published on the Managers’ website at bailliegifford.com. The Strategic report, which includes pages 07 to 48 was approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 8 December 2025. David Barron Chairman 41 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Baillie Gifford statement on stewardship management. While assessing alignment with management often comes down to intangible factors and an understanding built over time, we look for clear evidence of alignment in everything from capital allocation decisions in moments of stress to the details of executive remuneration plans and committed share ownership. We expect companies to deepen alignment with us, rather than weaken it, where the opportunity presents itself. Governance fit for purpose Corporate governance is a combination of structures and behaviours; a careful balance between systems, processes and people. Good governance is the essential foundation for long-term company success. We firmly believe that there is no single governance model that delivers the best long-term outcomes. We therefore strive to push back against one-dimensional global governance principles in favour of a deep understanding of each company we invest in. We look, very simply, for structures, people and processes which we think can maximise the likelihood of long-term success. We expect to trust the boards and management teams of the companies we select, but demand accountability ifthat trust is broken. Sustainable business practices A company’s ability to grow and generate value for our clients relies on a network of interdependencies between the company and the economy, society and environment in which it operates. We expect holdings to consider how their actions impact and rely on these relationships. We believe long-term success depends on maintaining a social licence to operate and look for holdings to work within the spirit and not just the letter of the laws and regulations that govern them. Material factors should be addressed at the board level as appropriate. Baillie Gifford’s overarching ethos is that we are ‘Actual’ investors. That means we seek to invest for the long term. Our role as an engaged owner is core to our mission to be effective stewards for our clients. As an active manager, we invest in companies at different stages of their evolution across many industries and geographies, and focus on their unique circumstances and opportunities. Our approach favours a small number of simple principles rather than overly prescriptive policies. This helps shape our interactions with holdings and ensures our investment teams have the freedom and retain the responsibility to act in clients’ best interests. Where possible we consider all asset classes within the framework of our stewardship activities. We seek to apply the most appropriate ownership tools to each holding in delivering our objectives. Long-term value creation We believe that companies that are run for the long-term are more likely to be better investments over our clients’ time horizons. We encourage our holdings to be ambitious, focusing on long-term value creation and capital deployment for growth. We know events will not always run according to plan. In these instances we expect management to act deliberately and to provide appropriate transparency. We think helping management to resist short-term demands from shareholders often protects returns. We regard it as our responsibility to encourage holdings away from destructive financial engineering towards activities that create genuine value over the long-run. Our value will often be in supporting management when others don’t. Alignment in vision and practice Alignment is at the heart of our stewardship approach. We seek the fair and equitable treatment of all shareholders alongside the interests of Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 42 Corporate governance and stewardship The Company has given discretionary voting powers to Baillie Gifford & Co. The Managers vote against resolutions they consider may damage shareholders’ rights or economic interests and report their actions to the Board. The Company believes that it is in the shareholders’ interests to consider environmental, social and governance (‘ESG’) factors when selecting and retaining investments and has asked the Managers to take these issues into account as long as the investment objectives are not compromised. TheManagers do not exclude companies from their investment universe purely on the grounds of ESG factors but adopt a positive engagement approach whereby matters are discussed with Environmental, social and governance engagement management with the aim of improving the relevant policies andmanagement systems and enabling the Managers toconsider how ESG factors could impact long-term investment returns. The Managers’ statement of compliance with the UK Stewardship Code can be found on the Managers’ website: bailliegifford.com. The Managers’ policy has been reviewed and endorsed by the Board. By engaging with companies, the Managers seek to build constructive relationships with them, to better inform our investment activities and, where necessary, effect change within our holdings, ultimately with the goal of achieving better returns for our shareholders. The graph belowshows the engagements in the year to 30September 2025. The examples on the following pages demonstrate our stewardship approach through constructive ongoingengagement. Engagement Themes 0 10 20 30 40 Environmental Social Governance Number of engagements 43 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc ASML Holding N.V. Objective We had an update from ASML’s sustainability team on the company’s progress against its climate- related targets and its engagement with the wider semiconductor value chain. For context, ASML has ambitious decarbonisation goals, significant influence over the energy-intensive semiconductor manufacturing process, and its customers depend on ASML to reduce the energy and water intensity oflithography. Discussion ASML has progressed from the awareness- raising stage to the implementation phase of its climate targets. Customer demand remains a core driver – 85per cent of customers cite climate as important–but there is also a strong internal conviction that pursuing these targets is the right course of action. ASML has no plans to alter its commitments, though it acknowledges potential difficulty in meeting its 2025 operational goal of achieving carbon neutrality. On Scope 3 emissions, the company’s engagement with customers centres on education and collaboration, with notable progress seen at TSMC. The Semiconductor Climate Consortium, which convenes stakeholders across the value chain, provides a valuable platform for collaboration in this respect. At the same time, ASML continues to enhance the energy efficiency of its systems and integrates customer feedback directly into design roadmaps. Renewable energy procurement remains the most significant challenge, particularly for customers in Korea andTaiwan. Outcome ASML remains a climate leader within the semiconductor value chain and continues to advance its targets. While challenges persist, the company’s commitment remains firm. We will continue to monitor its progress and any material developments across the value chain. © eqroy – stock.adobe.com Moncler S.p.A. Objective To assess the underpinnings of Moncler’s programme of supply chain excellence, an issue of reputational significance with implications for brand integrity. Investigations by Italian authorities in 2024 found sweatshop-like conditions in the supply chains of the luxury fashion brands Dior and Armani. Subsequent reports described these issues as systemic rather than sporadic in the sector, and the authorities are continuing investigations into the supply chains of other luxury brands, although the names remain undisclosed. We spoke with Moncler’s chief marketing and corporate strategy officer and sustainability director to understand how it navigates some of these reported challenges in the supplychain. Discussion Most of Moncler’s iconic puffer jackets have long been produced in Eastern Europe, including at its in-house production facility in Romania. The Italian supply chain is more integral to Moncler’s product diversification as part of a year-round brand strategy. Its supply chain audit processes appear robust, and in response to the risks, it has increased the number of audits it conducts in Italy. Supply chain audits are necessary but not sufficient, however, to address labour rights risks. Purchasing practices are also central to suppliers’ ability to uphold labour rights, and Moncler has initiatives that demonstrate a sophisticated level of awareness of the issue. We learned how purchasing teams are assessed and incentivised according to the vendor rating assessment of environmental and social risks identified in the supply chain audit process. Moncler’s emphasis on capacity-building, rather than simply imposing top-down sustainability standards on the supply chain, also represents best practice. Examples include free access to health and safety experts, training programs on international standards, and support for investments in machinery. Outcome This engagement helped further our understanding of Moncler’s supply chain sourcing practices. Their maturity means they are well-insulated, albeit far from immune, from the labour rights risks inherent to outsourced manufacturing in their supply chain. There were learnings that will inform future engagements with other luxury holdings. Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 44 © Mojahid Mottakin – stock.adobe.com Prosus N.V. Objective This call was to discuss updates to the executive remuneration policy that Prosus presented to shareholders last year. The chief executive officer’s (CEO) $100m moonshot award remains the central point of contention, due to concerns around pay-for- performance alignment. Discussion The CEO’s (Fabricio Bloisi) $100m moonshot remains intact, with some tweaks at the margins of the incentive structure. The moonshot’s target of doubling Prosus/Naspers’ market cap could theoretically be triggered by Tencent’s performance alone, which contributes the majority of Prosus’ NAV. However, this is a historic capital allocation decision and an asset that remains outside of management’s control. We reiterated our request for the introduction of a mechanism to mitigate the risk of windfall gains for executives resulting from Tencent’s performance alone i.e., a sliding clawback provision that reduces the size of the award the more that Tencent’s share price appreciation contributes to thetarget. Outcome Given that that the moonshot award put to shareholders at the 2025 annual general meeting (AGM) remained intact, and the company had not been receptive to our requests, we continued to oppose remuneration. Although we regard the CEO in high regard, we remain unconvinced regarding the appropriateness and efficacy of this incentivestructure. 45 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Baillie Gifford – proxy voting We believe that ‘active ownership’ of our clients’ holdings is as important as selecting the right investments in the first instance. These guidelines are aligned with our stewardship principles and describe our approach to proxy voting and company engagement, the key levers of active ownership, often described as ‘stewardship’. While these guidelines are intended to provide an insight into how we approach voting on our clients’ behalf, it is important to note that we assess every company individually. In voting, we will always evaluate proposals on a case-by-case basis, based on what we believe to be in the best long-term interests of our clients, rather than rigidly applying apolicy. A broad cross-section of our investment staff areinvolved in our ongoing work on stewardship. In the same way that our investment approach is based around empowered and independent teams, our voting and engagement is led by the individual investment teams. In keeping with our decentralised and autonomous culture, our investment teams will, on occasion, elect to vote differently on the same general meeting resolutions. Where this happens, we report accordingly in the proxy voting disclosure on our website. We also have clear processes in place to identify, prevent and manage potential proxy voting related conflicts of interest to ensure that in all cases the firm acts in the clients’ best interest. Baillie Gifford’s firm-wide conflict of interest disclosure is available on its website. Prior to taking any voting action, we usually address specific ESG concerns by engaging directly with the company, using voting as an escalation mechanism if we have not seen sufficient progress. Company meeting record Voting distribution Number of meetings voted with management 84% Number of meetings with at least one against, withhold or abstain 16% Number of votes for 96% Number of votes against 4% Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 46 Name Geography Business 2025 Value £’000 2025 % of total assets Bending Spoons  Italy Mobile application software developer 35,298 8.7 Prosus Netherlands Portfolio of online consumer companies 20,237 5.0 Topicus.com Netherlands Acquirer of vertical market software companies 17,016 4.2 ASML Netherlands Semiconductor equipment manufacturer 16,826 4.1 Adyen Netherlands Online payments platform 14,688 3.6 Allegro.eu Poland Ecommerce platform 13,263 3.3 EQT Sweden Investment firm, investing in equity, ventures, infrastructure and real estate 12,986 3.2 Vend Marketplaces Norway Media and classifieds advertising platforms 12,335 3.0 Roche Holding Switzerland Pharmaceuticals and diagnostics company 12,333 3.0 Reply Italy IT consulting and systems integration provider 12,072 3.0 Ryanair Ireland Low-cost airline 12,025 3.0 Novo Nordisk Denmark Pharmaceutical company 10,363 2.6 Spotify Sweden Online audio streaming service 10,244 2.5 Sandoz Sweden Generics & biosimilars pharmaceutical company 10,215 2.5 Sennder  Germany Freight forwarder focused on road logistics 10,167 2.5 Kingspan Ireland Building materials provider 9,430 2.3 Lonza Switzerland Contract development and manufacturing organisation 9,288 2.3 DSV Denmark Freight forwarder 9,044 2.2 Royal Unibrew Denmark Alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages 8,950 2.2 Camurus Sweden Develops and commercialises therapeutic medications 8,218 2.0 Hypoport Germany FinTech platform 7,827 1.9 EXOR Netherlands Investment company specialising in industrials 7,795 1.9 LVMH France Luxury goods 7,647 1.9 Moncler Italy Manufactures luxury apparel product 7,504 1.8 Assa Abloy Sweden Developer, designer and manufacturer in access solutions market 7,443 1.8 Dino Polska Poland Grocery store chain 6,953 1.7 ASM International Netherlands Semiconductor equipment manufacturer 6,699 1.6 Sartorius Stedim Biotech France Pharmaceutical and laboratory equipment provider 6,610 1.6 Grupa Kęty Poland Aluminium-extrusion and architectural systems producer 6,507 1.6 Röko Sweden Investment company acquiring niche small-to-mid businesses across multiple industries. 6,199 1.5 List of investments As at 30 September 2025 47 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Name Geography Business 2025 Value £’000 2025 % of total assets Kinnevik Sweden Investment company specialising in digital consumer businesses 5,720 1.4 Nexans France Cable manufacturing company 5,609 1.4 Richemont Switzerland Owner of luxury goods companies 5,489 1.4 Tekever Holdings Portugal Manufacturer of AI-driven unmanned aerial and satellite systems for defence and surveillance. 5,233 1.3 Epiroc Sweden Mining and infrastructure equipment provider 5,213 1.3 Atlas Copco Sweden Industrial group 5,179 1.3 Edenred France Payments and employee-benefits platform 5,025 1.2 IMCD Netherlands Speciality chemicals distributor 4,828 1.2 Instalco Sweden Serial acquirer of technical installation businesses 4,282 1.1 Avanza Bank Sweden Online investment platform 4,208 1.0 Flix  Germany Long-distance bus and train provider 4,162 1.0 Amplifon Italy Hearing-aid retail and related hearing-care services 4,153 1.0 Soitec France Manufactures engineered substrates for semiconductor wafers 3,680 1.0 Tonies Germany Musical storybox toys for children 2,375 0.6 AutoStore Norway Warehouse automation and cubic storage systems 1,817 0.5 McMakler  Germany Digital real estate broker – 0.0 Northvolt  Sweden Battery developer and manufacturer – 0.0 Total investments 403,155 99.2 Net liquid assets 3,052 0.8 Total assets 406,207 100.0 Borrowings (52,291) (13.0) Shareholders' funds 353,916 8 7. 0 Details of the ten largest investments are given on pages 18 to 21 along with comparative valuations. Denotes unlisted investment (private company). * New holdings bought during the year (Beijer Ref, CRISPR Therapeutics, Dassault Systemes, Eurofins, Genmab, Mettler Toledo, Vitec Software, VNVGlobal and Wizz Air Holdings were sold during the period). Strategic report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 48 Distribution of total assets * Sector 2025 Geographical 2025 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 8 9 10 * Total assets represents total net assets before deduction of borrowings. 3 4 5 7 2 6 1 Sector 2025 % 2024 % 1 Information Technology 26.1 26.2 2 Industrials 21.1 30.1 3 Health Care 15.1 10.1 4 Financials 12.8 13.5 5 Consumer Discretionary 10.6 11.9 6 Technology 9.6 4.4 7 Consumer Staples 3.9 2.2 8 Net liquid assets 0.8 0.6 9 Real Estate – 0.2 10 Consumer Services – 0.8 Geographical 2025 % 2024 % 1 Netherlands 21.6 23.9 2 Sweden 19.6 19.0 3 Italy 14.5 7.3 4 France 7.1 10.4 5 Denmark 7.0 8.8 6 Switzerland 6.7 5.5 7 Poland 6.6 4.1 8 Germany 6.0 7. 7 9 Ireland 5.3 7. 1 10 Norway 3.5 4.8 11 Portugal 1.3 – 12 Net liquid assets 0.8 0.6 13 Hungary – 0.8 Governance report This governance report, which includes pages 50 to 73, outlines the Board’s approach to the governance of your Company. We believe that good governance builds better outcomes and we are committed to high standards of corporate governance and transparency. Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 50 Directors and management David Barron Chairman Appointed 2023 David Barron has spent 25 years working in the investment management sector and until November 2019 was chief executive officer of Miton Group PLC following six years with the firm. Prior to this he was head of investment trusts at JP Morgan Asset Management for more than ten years having joined Robert Fleming in 1995. He is currently chairman of the audit committee of BlackRock American Income Trust plc. He was also a non-executive director of Premier Miton Group PLC until 7 July 2023. He was appointed a Director of the Company on 1 October 2023 and Chairman on 5February 2025. Directors Emma Davies Director Appointed 2021 Emma Davies (Senior Independent Director) is an experienced investment professional who has spent her career investing across global equity markets, as well as in the property and private equity markets in the UK. She has a sophisticated understanding of ESG considerations, particularly with regard to social and governance concerns. She is currently the chief investment officer at Guy’s & St Thomas’ Foundation and is also a non-executive director and chair of the audit and risk committee of Riverstone Credit Opportunities Income Plc. She was appointed aDirector of the Company in 2021. 51 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Davina Curling Director Appointed 2024 Davina Curling has over 30 years of fund management experience. She was managing director and head of Pan European equities at Russell Investments. Prior to that she was head of European equities at F&C, ISIS and Royal & SunAlliance. Davina has also held positions at Nikko Capital Management (UK) and Kleinwort Benson and was previously senior independent director of BlackRock Greater Europe Investment Trust plc, retiring at the end of her tenure in 2023. Davina is currently the senior independent director of abrdn Asia Focus plc. She was appointed a Director of the Company on 1November 2024. Andrew Watkins was head of client relations, sales and marketing for Invesco Perpetual’s listed investment funds business until his retirement in June 2017. He is currently chairman of Ashoka India Equity Investment Trust plc and CT UK High Income Trust plc, a director of Chelverton UK Dividend Trust plc and Consistent Unit Trust Management Company Limited. He was appointed a Director of the Company in 2019 and Chairman of the Audit Committee in 2024. Andrew Watkins Audit Committee Chair Appointed 2019 All of the Directors are members of the Audit Committee. Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 52 Managers and secretaries The Company has appointed Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford & Co, as its Alternative Investment Fund Managers (‘AIFM’) and Company Secretary. Baillie Gifford & Co Limited has delegated investment management services to Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford & Co is an investment management firm formed in 1927 out of the legal firm Baillie Gifford, WS, which had been involved in investment management since 1908. Baillie Gifford is one of the largest investment trust managers in the UK and currently manages twelve closed-end investment companies. Baillie Gifford also manages unit trusts and open ended investment companies, together with investment portfolios on behalf of pension funds, charities and other institutional clients, both in the UK and overseas. Funds under the management or advice of Baillie Gifford totalled around £205billion as at 4December 2025. Basedin Edinburgh, it is one of the leading privately owned investment management firms in the UK, with 59partners and a staff of around 1,640. The Managers of Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust are Stephen Paice and Chris Davies. Stephen is Head of the European Equity Team and became a partner of Baillie Gifford & Co on 1 April 2024. Chrisis an Investment Manager in the European Equity Team. Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited are both authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 53 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc The Directors present their Reporttogether with the audited Financial Statements of the Company for the year to 30September 2025. Directors’ report Corporate governance The Corporate governance report is set out on pages58 to 64 and forms part of this Report. Managers and Company Secretaries Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford & Co, was appointed asthe Company’s Alternative Investment Fund Manager (‘AIFM’) and Company Secretaries on 29November 2019. Baillie Gifford & Co Limited has delegated portfolio management services to Baillie Gifford & Co. Dealing activity and transaction reporting has been further sub-delegated to BaillieGifford Overseas Limited and Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited. The Investment Management Agreement between the AIFM and the Company sets out the matters over which the Managers have authority in accordance with the policies and directions of, and subject to restrictions imposed by, the Board. The Investment Management Agreement is terminable on not less than three months’ notice or on shorter notice in certain circumstances. Compensation would only be payable if termination occurred prior to the expiry of the notice period. The annual management fee is 0.55% of the lower of (i) the Company’s market capitalisation and (ii) the Company’s net asset value (which shall include income), in either case up to £500 million, and 0.50% of the amount of the lower of the Company’s market capitalisation or net asset value above £500 million, calculated and payablequarterly. Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 54 Careful consideration has been given by the Board as to the basis on which the management fee is charged. The Board considers that maintaining a relatively low ongoing charges ratio is in the best interests of the shareholders. The Board is also of the view that calculating the fee with reference to performance would be unlikely to exert a positive influence over the long-term performance. The Board considers the Company’s investment management and secretarial arrangements on an ongoing basis and a formal review is conducted annually. The Board considered, amongst others, the following topics in its review: the quality of the personnel assigned to handle the Company’s affairs; the investment process and the results achieved to date; investment performance; the administrative services provided by the Secretaries and the quality of information provided; the marketing efforts undertaken by the Managers; the relationship with the Managers; and comparative peer group charges and fees. Following the most recent review, the Board concluded that the continuing appointment of Baillie Gifford & Co Limited as AIFM and the delegation of investment management services to Baillie Gifford & Co, on the terms agreed, is in the interests of shareholders as a whole. Depositary In accordance with the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations, Northern Trust Investor Services has been appointed as Depositary to theCompany. The Depositary’s responsibilities include cash monitoring, safe keeping of the Company’s financial instruments, verifying ownership and maintaining a record of other assets and monitoring the Company’s compliance with investment limits and leverage requirements. Custody services are provided by The Northern Trust Company (as a delegate of the Depositary) (‘the Custodian’). Directors Information about the Directors, including their relevant experience, can be found on pages 50 and51. All Directors will retire at the Annual General Meeting and offer themselves for re-election. Following a formal performance evaluation, the Chairman confirms that the Board considers that their performance continues to be effective and each remains committed to the Company. Their contribution to the Board is greatly valued and the Board recommends their re-election to shareholders. Director indemnification and insurance The Company has entered into qualifying third party deeds of indemnity in favour of each of its Directors. The deeds, which were in force during the year to 30 September 2025 and up to the date of approval of this report, cover any liabilities that may arise to a third party, other than the Company, for negligence, default or breach of trust or duty. The Directors are not indemnified in respect of liabilities to the Company, any regulatory or criminal fines, any costs incurred in connection with criminal proceedings in which the Director is convicted or civil proceedings brought by the Company in which judgement is given against her or him. In addition, the indemnity does not apply to any liability to the extent that it is recovered from another person. The Company maintains Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance. Conflicts of interest Each Director submits a list of potential conflicts of interest to the Board for consideration and approval at each meeting. The Board considers these carefully, taking into account the circumstances surrounding them prior to authorisation. Having considered the lists of potential conflicts there were no situations which gave rise to a direct or indirect interest of a Director which conflicted with the interests of the Company. Dividends The Board recommends a final dividend of 0.72pper ordinary share (2024 – 0.60p). Dividends will only be paid to the extent needed to maintain the Company’s investment trust status. If approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting, the recommended final dividend per ordinary share will be paid on 13 February 2026 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 9January 2026. The ex-dividend date is 8January 2026. The Company’s Registrar offers aDividend Reinvestment Plan (see page 110) and thefinal date for elections for this dividend is 23January 2026. Share capital Capital structure The Company’s capital structure at 30 September 2025 consists of 402,443,690 ordinary shares of 2.5p each (2024 – 402,443,690) of which 324,722,867 (2024 – 351,783,279) are allotted and fully paid and 77,720,823 (2024 – 50,660,411) are held in treasury. 55 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc There are no restrictions concerning the holding or transfer of the Company’s ordinary shares and there are no special rights attached to any of the shares. Dividends The ordinary shares carry a right to receive dividends. Interim dividends are determined by the Directors, whereas the proposed final dividend is subject to shareholder approval. Capital entitlement On a winding up, after meeting the liabilities of the Company, the surplus assets will be paid to ordinary shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings. Voting Each ordinary shareholder present in person or by proxy is entitled to one vote on a show of hands and, on a poll, to one vote for every share held. Information on the deadlines for proxy appointments can be found on pages 106 to 108. Major interests disclosed in the Company’s shares The Company has received notifications in accordance with the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure and Transparency Rule 5.1.2R of the following interests in 3% or more of the voting rights attached to the Company’s issued share capital. Name Number of ordinary 2.5p shares held at 30September 2025 % of issue Allspring Global Investments Holdings 62,902,608 19.4% City of London Investment Management Company Ltd 42,671,214 13.1% 1607 Capital Partners LLC 36,417,693 11.2% Investec Wealth & Investment Ltd 18,433,790 5.7% Charles Stanley 17,973,280 5.5% Saba Capital Management, L.P. † 15,892,544 4.9% * Ordinary shares in issue excluding treasury shares. † Including shares held through Total Return Swaps. During the period from 30 September 2025 to 4December 2025, the Company was notified that Allspring Global Investments Holdings held 65,167,172 (21.2% of the shares in issue as at 4December 2025, City of London Investment Management Company Ltd held 39,974,911 (13.0% of the shares in issues as at 4 December 2025) and the Company was advised that Saba Capital Management, L.P no longer holds any voting rights in the Company. There have been no other changes to the major interests in the Company’s shares intimated up to 4December 2025. Analysis of Shareholders at 30 September 2025 Number of shares held 2025 % 2024 Number of shares held 2024 % Institutions 166,295,985 51.2 161,776,710 46.0 Intermediaries/ Retail Savings Platforms 124,202,962 38.3 156,559,705 44.5 Individuals 18,476,674 5.7 22,109,766 6.3 Marketmakers 15,747,246 4.8 11,337,098 3.2 324,722,867 100.0 351,783,279 100.0 Annual General Meeting The details of this year’s AGM, including the proposed resolutions and information on the deadlines for proxy appointments, can be found on pages 106 to 108. Shareholders who hold shares in their own name on the main register will be provided with a Form of Proxy. If you hold shares through a share platform or other nominee, the Board would encourage you to contact these organisations directly as soon as possible to arrange for you to vote at the AGM. The resolutions relating to the renewal of the Directors’ authorities to issue and buyback shares are explained in more detail below. Authority to hold general meetings at shorter notice Resolution 14, which is proposed as a special resolution, seeks authority for the Directors to convene general meetings of the Company, other than Annual General Meetings (‘AGMs’), on a minimum of 14 clear days’ notice. The notice period for AGMs will remain at 21 clear days. The approval will be effective until the Company’s next AGM, atwhich it is intended that renewal will be sought. The Directors will only call general meetings on 14clear days’ notice where they consider it in the best interests of shareholders to do so and the relevant matter requires to be dealt with expediently. Share issuance authority Resolution 11 in the Notice of Annual General Meeting seeks to renew the Directors’ general authority to issue shares up to an aggregate nominal amount of £2,560,023. This amount represents one-third of the Company’s total ordinary share capital currently in issue and meets institutional guidelines. No issue of ordinary shares will be made pursuant to the authorisation of Resolution 11 which would effectively alter the control of the Company without the prior approval of shareholders in general meeting. Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 56 Resolution 12, which is proposed as a special resolution, seeks authority for the Directors to issueshares or sell shares held in treasury on a non pre-emptive basis for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of £768,007 (representing 10% of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as at 4 December 2025). This authority will continue until the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2027 or on the expiry of 15 months from the passing of the resolution, if earlier. Such authorities will only be used to issue shares or sell shares from treasury at a premium to NAV and only when the Directors believe that it would be in the best interests of the Company to do so. During the year to 30 September 2025, no shares (2024– no shares) were issued from treasury. Market purchases of own shares At the last Annual General Meeting the Company was granted authority to purchase up to 52,140,104 ordinary shares (equivalent to 14.99% of its issued share capital), such authority to expire at the 2026 Annual General Meeting. The Directors are seeking shareholders’ approval at the Annual General Meeting to renew the authority to make market purchases of up to 14.99% of the Company’s ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) atthe date of passing of the resolution, such authority to expire at the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2027. Such purchases will only be made at a discount to the prevailing NAV. During the year to 30 September 2025, 27,060,412 shares (representing 7.7% of issued share capital at 30September 2024) at a discount to net asset value at a cost of £26,852,000 (2024 – 6,365,921 shares) were bought back under the buy-back authority. Between 1 October and 4December 2025, 17,520,000 shares were bought back. 95,240,823 shares were held in treasury as at 4 December 2025 (representing 24% of the sharecapital). The Company may hold bought-back shares in treasury and then: (i) sell such shares (or any of them) for cash (or its equivalent under the Companies Act 2006); or (ii) cancel the shares (or any of them). Shares will only be resold from treasury at a premium to NAV. Treasury shares do not receive distributions and the Company will not be entitled to exercise the voting rights attaching to them. In accordance with the Listing Rules, the maximum price (excluding expenses) that may be paid on the exercise of the authority must not exceed the higherof: (i) 5 per cent. above the average closing price on the London Stock Exchange of an ordinary share over the five business days immediately preceding the date of purchase; and (ii) the higher of the price of the last independent trade and the highest current independent bid on the London Stock Exchange. The minimum price (exclusive of expenses) that may be paid will be the nominal value of an ordinary share. Purchases of ordinary shares will be made within guidelines established, from time to time, bythe Board. Your attention is drawn to Resolution 13 in the Notice of Annual General Meeting. Thisauthority, if conferred, will only be exercised if to do so would result in an increase in NAV for the remaining shareholders and if it is considered in the best interests of shareholders generally. Recommendation The Directors unanimously recommend you vote in favour of the resolutions to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting as it is their view that the resolutions are in the best interests of shareholders as a whole. Financial instruments The Company’s financial instruments comprise its investment portfolio, cash balances, borrowings and debtors and creditors that arise directly from its operations such as sales and purchases awaiting settlement and accrued income. The financial risk management objectives and policies arising from its financial instruments and the exposure of the Company to risk are disclosed in note 19 to the Financial Statements. 57 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Future developments of the Company The outlook for the Company is set out in the Chairman’s statement on pages 07 to 10 and in the Managers report on pages 11 to 17. Articles of Association The Company’s Articles of Association may only be amended by special resolution at a general meeting of shareholders. Disclosure of information to Auditor The Directors confirm that, so far as each of the Directors is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s Auditor is unaware and the Directors have taken all the steps that they might reasonably be expected to have taken as Directors in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s Auditor is aware of thatinformation. Independent Auditor The Auditor, BDO LLP, is willing to continue in office, and in accordance with section 489 and section 491(1) of the Companies Act 2006, resolutions concerning BDO LLP’s reappointment and remuneration will be submitted to the Annual General Meeting. Post Balance Sheet events The Directors confirm, up to 8December 2025, that there have been no significant post Balance Sheet events which require adjustment to the Financial Statements. Stakeholder engagement Although the Company has no employees, trade suppliers or customers, the Directors give regular consideration to the need to foster the Company’s business relationships with its stakeholders, in particular with shareholders, its externally appointed Managers, other professional service providers and lenders. The effect of this consideration upon the key decisions taken by the Company during the financial year is set out in further detail in the Strategic report on pages 37 to 39. Greenhouse gas emissions and Streamlined Energy & Carbon Reporting (‘SECR’) All of the Company’s activities are outsourced to third parties. The Company therefore has no greenhouse gas emissions to report from its operations, nor does it have responsibility for any other emissions producing sources under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013. For the same reasons as set out above, the Company considers itself to be a low energy user under the SECR regulations and has no energy and carbon information to disclose. Bribery Act The Company has a zero tolerance policy towards bribery and is committed to carrying out business fairly, honestly and openly. The Managers also adopt a zero tolerance approach and have policies and procedures in place to prevent bribery. Criminal Finances Act 2017 The Company has a commitment to zero tolerance towards the criminal facilitation of tax evasion. On behalf of the Board David Barron Chairman 8 December 2025 Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 58 Compliance The FRC has confirmed that AIC member companies who report against the AIC Code will be meeting their obligations in relation to the UK Code. The Board confirms that the Company has complied throughout the year under review with the relevant provisions of the UK Code and the recommendations of the AIC Code except as follows: • a Nomination Committee has not been established. As the Board is comprised entirely of non-executive Directors and is small in size, a Nomination Committee is considered unnecessary. • the Company has no executive Directors and no employees and consequently does not have a Remuneration Committee. The Directors’ Remuneration report on pages 68 to 71 provides information on the remuneration arrangements for the Directors of the Company. The Chairman is available to engage with shareholders on issues relating to Directors’ remuneration where required. • given the small size of the Board and the fact that all Directors are independent, the Company does not have a Management Engagement Committee. The Company’s management functions are delegated to the AIFM, who has delegated the management of the Company’s investment portfolio to the Investment Manager, Baillie Gifford & Co. The Board reviews at least annually the performance of the AIFM, the terms of its engagement and the continued appointment of the AIFM. The Board also reviews the performance of the Investment Manager. • the Audit Committee comprises all Directors of the Company. The Chairman is a member of the Audit Committee as he was independent on appointment. Corporate governance report The Board is committed to achieving and demonstrating high standards of Corporate Governance. This statement outlines how the principles of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (the ‘UK Code’) which can be found at frc.org.uk and the relevant principles of the Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’) Code of Corporate Governance (the ‘AIC Code’) published in 2019 were applied throughout the financial year. The AIC Code provides a framework of best practice for investment companies and can befound at theaic.co.uk. The Board is also mindful of the updated UK Corporate Governance Code 2024, the majority of its provisions will apply to the financial year ending 30September 2026. 59 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc The Board The Board has overall responsibility for the Company’s affairs. It has a number of matters formally reserved for its approval including strategy, investment policy, gearing, share buy-back and issuance policy, treasury matters, dividend and corporate governance policy. The Board seeks to contribute to the delivery of the Company’s strategy by engaging with the Managers in a collaborative and collegiate manner with open and respectful discussion and debate being encouraged, whilst also ensuring that appropriate and regular challenge is brought and evaluation is conducted. The Board also reviews the Financial Statements, investment transactions, revenue budgets and performance of the Company. Full and timely information is provided to the Board to enable it to function effectively and to allow Directors to discharge their responsibilities. As at 30 September 2025 the Board comprised four Directors, all of whom are non-executive. The Chairman is responsible for organising the business of the Board, ensuring its effectiveness and setting its agenda. The executive responsibility for investment management has been delegated to the Company’s Alternative Investment Fund Manager (‘AIFM’), Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, and, in the context of a Board comprising only non-executive Directors, there is no chief executive officer. The Senior Independent Director is Emma Davies. The Directors believe that the Board has a balance of skills and experience that enables it to provide effective strategic leadership and proper governance of the Company. Information about the Directors, including their relevant experience, can be found onpages 50 and 51. There is an agreed procedure for Directors to seek independent professional advice, if necessary, attheCompany’s expense. Appointments to the Board The terms and conditions of Directors’ appointments are set out in formal letters of appointment which are available for inspection on request. Under the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association, Directors are subject to election by shareholders at the first AGM after their appointment. Thereafter, at each AGM any Director who has not stood for re-election at either of the two preceding AGMs is required to retire and offer themselves for re-election. In addition, one third of the Directors eligible to retire by rotation shall retire from office at each AGM. Beyond these requirements, it has been agreed that all Directors will seek annual re-election at the Company’s AGMs. Independence of Directors All the Directors are considered by the Board to be independent of the Managers and free of any business or other relationship which could interfere with the exercise of their independent judgement. The Directors recognise the importance of succession planning for company boards and review the Board’s composition annually. The Board is of theview that length of service will not necessarily compromise the independence or contribution of directors of an investment trust company, where continuity and experience can be a benefit to the Board. The Board concurs with the view expressed in the AIC Code that long-serving Directors should not be prevented from being considered independent. In accordance with the AIC Code of Corporate Governance, all Directors are subject to annual re-election. Following a formal performance evaluation, the Board concluded that its members continued to be independent in character and judgement and their skills and experience added significantly to the strength of the Board. Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 60 BDO LLP Auditor Northern Trust Investor Services Limited Depositary and custodian Peel Hunt LLP Company broker Board of Directors Comprises independent non-executive directors Chairman: David Barron SeniorIndependent Director: Emma Davies Audit Committee Chair: Andrew Watkins Purpose: To provide oversight of: • the financial reporting process; • the audit process; • the Company’s system of internal controls; and • compliance with laws and regulations. Nomination Committee Chair: David Barron Purpose: To oversee: • Board recruitment; • succession planning; and • Board appraisals including identifying training needs. Third-party service providers appointed by the Board Dashed arrows indicate reporting lines * The independent non executive directors are made up of David Barron, Emma Davies, Andrew Watkins and Davina Curling. Further details on their experience and contribution to the Board can be found on pages 51 and 52. Baillie Gifford & Co Alternative Investment Fund Manasgers and Company Secretaries: Baillie Gifford & Co Limited (wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford & Co) Dealing activity and transaction reporting: Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited Portfolio management: Baillie Gifford & Co Computershare Investor Services PLC Registrar 61 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Meetings There is an annual cycle of Board meetings whichisdesigned to address, in a systematic way, overall strategy, review of investment policy, investment performance, marketing, revenue budgets, dividend policy and communication with shareholders. The Board considers that it meets sufficiently regularly to discharge its duties effectively. The table below shows the attendance record for the Board and Committee meetings held during the year. The Annual General Meeting was attended by all Directors serving at that date. Directors’ attendance at meetings Board Audit Committee Number of meetings 5 4 David Barron 5 4 Davina Curling # 5 4 Emma Davies 5 4 Andrew Watkins 5 4 Michael MacPhee * 2 2 # Appointed on 1 November 2024. * Retired on 5 February 2025. Policy on Chairman’s tenure The Board’s policy is that the Chairman will serve for no longer than nine years, other than in exceptional circumstances for the benefit of the Company. Performance evaluation An appraisal of the Chairman, each Director and a performance evaluation and review of the Board as a whole and the Audit Committee was carried out during the year. Each Director and the Chairman responded to an evaluation questionnaire. The Chairman’s appraisal was led by Emma Davies, the Senior Independent Director. The appraisals and evaluations considered, amongst other criteria, the balance of skills of the Board, training and development requirements, the contribution of individual Directors and the overall effectiveness of the Board and the Audit Committee. Following this process it was concluded that there was a diverse range of skills within the Board, and the performance of each Director, the Chairman, the Board and the Audit Committee continues to be effective and that each Director and the Chairman remain committed to the Company. A review of the Chairman’s and the other Directors’ commitments was carried out and the Board is satisfied that they are capable of devoting sufficient time to the Company. There were no significant changes to the Chairman’s other commitments during the year. Diversity Appointments to the Board are made on merit with due regard for the benefits of diversity including gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, cognitive and personal strengths. The priority in appointing new Directors is to identify the candidate with the best range of skills and experience to complement existing Directors. Within the context of a small, entirely non-executive Board, a single appointment or retirement can have a significant impact on percentage representation, and a limited number of senior roles are available. The Board will endeavour to comply with the UK Listing Rules diversity targets more often than not but notes that an orderly succession plan can, when implemented thoughtfully and having regard to the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, take a significant period of time to develop and may result in periods when the diversity targets are not met. Board composition In order to fulfil its obligations, the Board recognises the importance of having a range of skilled and experienced Directors, balancing the benefits of length of service and knowledge of the Company with the desirability of ensuring regular refreshment of the Board. The Board reviews its composition annually. The following disclosures are provided in respect of the UK Listing Rules targets that: i) 40% of a board should be women; ii) at least one senior role should be held by a woman; and iii) at least one board member should be from a non-white ethnic background, as defined by the Office of National Statistics criteria. As an externally managed investment company with no chief executive officer or chief financial officer, the roles which qualify as senior under FCA guidance are Chair and Senior Independent Director (‘SID’). The Board also considers Audit Committee Chair to represent a senior role within this context. The Board has resolved that the Company’s year end date be the most appropriate date for disclosure purposes. Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 62 As at 30 September 2025, the Board did not comply with the UK Listing Rule target with respect to ethnic background but met the 40% target for women. The Board considers that its small size is the principal reason why the Listing Rule targets were not met. The Board supports, and is ambitious to meet, all the Listing Rule diversity targets and will continue to review its size and composition both as part of its refreshment cycle and more widely. There have been no changes since 30 September 2025, data has been collected on a self-reporting basis. Gender identity Number % Senior roles Men 2 50 1 Women 2 50 1 Prefer not to say – – – * The Board Chairman and SID being senior positions in accordance with the UK Listing Rules. The Board also considers the Audit Committee Chair to be a senior position. The Audit Committee Chair is a man. Ethnic background Number % Senior roles White 4 100 2 Prefer not to say – – – * The Board Chairman and SID, being senior positions in accordance with the UK Listing Rules. The Board also considers the Audit Committee Chair to be a senior position. The Audit Committee Chair’s ethnic background is White. All recruitment for new Board members will be external, through the use of an external recruitment agency. The recruitment agency will be engaged to undertake the selection of a list of suitable candidates for consideration and approval by the Board. The external recruitment agency will be asked to put forward candidates with the desired skillset and also with a diverse range of backgrounds, cultures and identities. The Board will take the Listing Rule diversity targets and any other best practice matters into account when determining the appropriateness of a candidate and final appointment. Induction and training New directors are provided with an induction programme which is tailored to the particular circumstances of the appointee. Regular briefings were provided during the year on industry and regulatory matters. Directors receive other relevant training as necessary. Audit Committee The report of the Audit Committee is set out on pages 65 to 67. Internal controls and risk management The Directors acknowledge their responsibility forthe Company’s risk management and internal control systems and for reviewing their effectiveness, including with regard to preparation of the Company’s Annual Report and Financial Statements. The systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and can only provide reasonable but not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. The Board confirms that there is an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the Company in accordance with the FRC guidance ‘Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting’. The practical measures in relation to the design, implementation and maintenance of control policies and procedures to safeguard the Company’s assets and to manage its affairs properly, including the maintenance of effective operational and compliance controls have been delegated to the Managers and Secretaries. The Board oversees the functions delegated to the Managers and Secretaries and the controls managed by the AIFM in accordance with the UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations (as detailed below). Baillie Gifford & Co’s Internal Audit and Compliance Departments and the AIFM’s permanent risk function provide the Audit Committee with regular reports on their monitoring programmes. The reporting procedures for these departments are defined and formalised within a service level agreement. Baillie Gifford & Co conducts an annual review of its system of internal controls which is documented within an internal controls report which complies with ISAE 3402 – Assurance Reports on Internal Controls of Service Organisations made available to Third Parties. This report is independently reviewed by Baillie Gifford & Co’s Auditor and a copy is submitted to the Audit Committee. A report identifying the material risks faced by the Company and the key controls employed to manage these risks is reviewed by the Audit Committee. These procedures ensure that consideration is given regularly to the nature and extent of risks facing the Company and that they are being actively monitored. Where changes in risk have been identified during the year they also provide a mechanism to assess whether further action is required to manage theserisks. 63 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc The Directors confirm that they have reviewed the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management and internal controls systems, which accord with the FRC ‘Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting’ and they have procedures in place toreview their effectiveness on a regular basis. Nosignificant weaknesses were identified in the year under review and up to the date of this Annual Report. The Board confirms that these procedures have been in place throughout the Company’s financial year and continue to be in place up to the date of approval of this Annual Report. To comply with the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations, Northern Trust Investor Services acts as the Company’s Depositary and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited as its AIFM. The Depositary’s responsibilities include cash monitoring, safe keeping of the Company’s financial instruments, verifying ownership and maintaining a record of other assets and monitoring the Company’s compliance with investment limits and leverage requirements. The Depositary is liable for the loss of financial instruments held in custody. The Company’s Custodian is The Northern Trust Company. The Custodian prepares reports on its key controls and safeguards which are independently reviewed by KPMG LLP. The reports are reviewed by Baillie Gifford’s Business Risk Department and a summary of the key points is reported to the Audit Committee and any concerns are investigated. The Depositary provides the Audit Committee with a report on its monitoring activities. The AIFM has established a permanent risk management function to ensure that effective risk management policies and procedures are in place and to monitor compliance with risk limits. The AIFM has a risk management policy which covers the risks associated with the management of the portfolio, and the adequacy and effectiveness of this policy is reviewed and approved at least annually. This review includes the risk management processes and systems and limits for each risk area. The risk limits, which are set by the AIFM and approved by the Board, take into account the objectives, strategy and risk profile of the portfolio. These limits, including leverage (see page 113), are monitored and the sensitivity of the portfolio to key risks is undertaken periodically as appropriate to ascertain the impact of changes in key variables in the portfolio. Exceptions from limits monitoring and stress testing undertaken by Baillie Gifford’s Business Risk Department are escalated to the AIFM and reported to the Board along with any remedial measures being taken. Going concern In accordance with the Financial Reporting Council’s guidance on going concern and liquidity risk, the Directors have undertaken a rigorous review of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s principal and emerging risks are market related. An explanation of these risks and how they are managed is on pages 32 to 36 and contained in note 19 to the Financial Statements. The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility due to macroeconomic and geopolitical concerns and has conducted specific leverage and liquidity stress testing but does not believe the Company’s going concern status is affected. The Company’s assets, which at present are mainly investments in quoted securities which are readily realisable, exceed its liabilities significantly. All borrowings require the prior approval of the Board. Gearing levels and compliance with borrowing covenants are reviewed by the Board on a regular basis. The Company has continued to comply with the investment trust status requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) (Tax) Regulations 2011. The Company’s primary third party suppliers, including its Managers and Secretaries, Custodian, Depositary, Registrar, Auditor and Corporate Broker, are not experiencing significant operational difficulties affecting their respective services to the Company. Accordingly, the Financial Statements have been prepared on the going concern basis as it is the Directors’ opinion, having assessed the principal and emerging risks and other matters, as set out in the Viability Statement on page 31, that the Company will continue in operational existence for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of these Financial Statements. Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 64 Relations with shareholders The Board places great importance on communication with shareholders. The Company’s Managers meet regularly with shareholders and their representatives. The Chairman and Senior Independent Director also meet shareholders independently of the Managers and report shareholders’ views to the Board. Shareholders wishing to communicate with any members of the Board may do so by writing to them at the Company’s registered office or through the Company’s broker, Peel Hunt LLP (see contact details on page 119). All correspondence addressed to the Chairman is dealt with directly bytheChairman. The Company’s Annual General Meeting provides a further forum for communication with all shareholders. The level of proxies lodged for each resolution is announced at the meeting and is published at bgeuropeangrowth.com subsequent to the meeting. The notice period for the Annual General Meeting is at least 21 clear days. Shareholders and potential investors may obtain up-to-date information from the Company’s page on the Managers’ website at bgeuropeangrowth.com. Corporate governance and stewardship The Board believes that it is in the shareholders’ interests to consider environmental, social and governance (‘ESG’) factors including climate change when selecting and retaining investments and has asked the Managers to take these issues into account. The Managers do not exclude companies from their investment universe purely on the grounds of ESG factors but adopt a positive engagement approach whereby matters are discussed with management with the aim of improving the relevant policies and management systems and enabling the Managers to consider how ESG factors could impact long-term investment returns. The Managers’ Statement of Compliance with the UK Stewardship Code can be found on the Managers’ website: bailliegifford.com. The Company has given discretionary voting powers to Baillie Gifford & Co. The Managers vote against resolutions they consider may damage shareholders’ rights or economic interests and their actions are reported at Board meetings. Climate change The Board recognises that climate change poses a serious threat to our environment, our society and to economies and companies around the globe. Addressing the underlying causes is likely to result in companies that are high emitters of carbon facing greater societal and regulatory scrutiny and higher costs to account for the true environmental impact of their activities. The Managers’ pursuit of long-term growth opportunities typically involves investment in entrepreneurial, disruptive and technology-driven businesses. These companies are often capital-light with a low carbon footprint. The Managers believe that carbon footprint metrics in isolation are unhelpful – that some firms pollute more than others is a mostly meaningless observation. An external provider was engaged to map the carbon footprint of the portfolio. This analysis shows that the carbon intensity of Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust is 34% less than the index (FTSE All-World Europe ex UK Index) and is based on 80% of the value of the Company’s portfolio which has either reported or estimated S12 carbon emissions data and 80% of the value of the Company’s portfolio which has estimated S3 carbon emissions data. Baillie Gifford’s Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (‘TCFD’) Climate Report isavailable on the Managers’ Website at bailliegifford.com. A Company specific TCFD climate report is also available on the Company’s page of the Managers’ website at bgeuropeangrowth.com. This report is a means by which the portfolio’s carbon footprint and exposure to climate risk are measured and reported. Companies disclosing their emission and communicating emissions plans will be a helpful place from which to begin more useful discussions with management teams, industry experts and regulators. The Managers, Baillie Gifford & Co, are signatories to the Carbon Disclosure Project and are also members of the International Corporate Governance Network. On behalf of the Board David Barron Chairman 8 December 2025 65 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc The Audit Committee consists of all Directors. The members of the Committee consider that they have the requisite financial skills and experience to fulfil the responsibilities of the Committee. Andrew Watkins is the Chairman of the Committee. Audit Committee report The Committee’s authority and duties are clearly defined within its written Terms of Reference which are available on request from the Company and on the Company’s page of the Managers’ website: bgeuropeangrowth.com. The Terms of Reference arereviewed annually. The Committee’s effectiveness is reviewed on an annual basis as part of the Board’s performance evaluation process (see page 59). At least once a year the Committee meets with the external Auditor without any representative of the Manager being present. Main activities of the Commitee The Committee met four times during the year, with two of the meetings focussed on the review of the Company’s private company valuations. Baillie Gifford attended all meetings. Baillie Gifford & Co’s Internal Audit and Compliance Departments and the AIFM’s permanent risk function provided reports on their monitoring programmes for the two meetings focussed on governance and the approval of the financial statements. BDO LLP attended both of those meetings and held separate meetings with the Audit Committee Chair in advance of both Committee meetings. In addition, the external auditor met with the Audit Committee Chair on an ad-hoc basis to discuss matters pertinent to the Committee as they arose. The matters considered, monitored and reviewed by the Committee during the course of the year included the following: • the results announcement and Annual and Interim Reports; • the Company’s accounting policies and practices and the implementation of the Managers’ valuation policy for investments in unquoted companies; Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 66 • the regulatory changes impacting the Company; • the fairness, balance and understandability of the Annual Report and Financial Statements and whether it provided the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model and strategy; • the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control environment; • the appointment/reappointment, remuneration and terms of engagement of the external Auditor; • whether the audit services contract should be put out to tender; • the policy on the engagement of the external Auditor to supply non-audit services; • the independence and objectivity of the external Auditor and the effectiveness of the audit process; • the need for the Company to have its own internal audit function; • the internal controls reports and bridging letters where appropriate received from the Managers and other service providers including the Custodian and the Registrar; and • the arrangements in place within Baillie Gifford & Co whereby its staff may, in confidence, raise concerns about possible improprieties in matters of financial reporting or other matters. Internal audit The Committee continues to believe that the compliance and internal control systems and the internal audit function in place within the Managers provide sufficient assurance that a sound system of internal control, which safeguards shareholders’ investment and the Company’s assets, is maintained. An internal audit function, specific to the Company, is therefore considered unnecessary. The external Auditor has adopted a wholly substantive approach to testing and therefore the absence of an internal audit function has not had an impact on audit procedures. Financial reporting The Committee considers that the most significant issues likely to affect the Financial Statements are the existence and valuation of investments, as they represent 99.2% of total assets, and the accuracy and completeness of income from investments. The majority of the investments are in quoted securities and market prices are readily available from independent external pricing sources. The Committee reviewed the Managers’ Report on Internal Controls which details the controls in place regarding recording and pricing of investments, accurate recording of investment income and the reconciliation of investment holdings to third partydata. The Managers agreed the prices of all the listed investments at 30 September 2025 to external price sources. The Committee reviewed the Managers’ valuation policy for investments in private companies (as described on pages 86 and 87 ) and approved the valuation of the unlisted investments following a detailed review of the valuation of the investments and relevant challenge where appropriate. The listed portfolio holdings were agreed by the Managers to confirmations from the Company’s custodian. The unlisted holdings were agreed by the Managers to confirmations from the investee companies. The Committee considered the factors, including the impact of increasing geopolitical tensions, that might affect the Company’s viability over a period of five years and its ability to continue as a going concern for at least twelve months from the date of signing of the Financial Statements, together with the reports from the Managers on the cash position and cash flow projections of the Company, the liquidity of the investment portfolio, compliance with debt covenants, availability of borrowing facilities and the Company’s ability to meet its obligations as they fall due. The Committee also reviewed the Viability Statement on page 31 and the statement on Going Concern on page 63 including the impact of increasing geopolitical tensions. Following this assessment, the Committee recommended to the Board the appropriateness of the Going Concern basis in preparing the Financial Statements and confirmed the accuracy of the Viability Statement and statement on Going Concern. The Managers and Auditor confirmed to the Committee that they were not aware of any material misstatements in the context of the Financial Statements as a whole and that the Financial Statements are in accordance with applicable law and accounting standards. 67 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Internal controls and risk management The Committee reviewed the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management and internal controls systems as described on pages 62 and 63. Nosignificant weaknesses were identified in the year under review. External Auditor To fulfil its responsibility regarding the independence and objectivity of the external Auditor, the Committee reviewed: • the audit plan for the year to 30 September 2025; • a report from the Auditor describing its arrangements to manage auditor independence and received confirmation of its independence; and • the extent of non-audit services provided by the external Auditor. To assess the effectiveness of the external Auditor, the Committee reviewed and considered: • the Auditor’s fulfilment of the agreed audit plan; • feedback from the Secretaries on the performance of the audit team; • the Audit Quality Inspection Report from the FRC; and • detailed discussion with audit personnel to challenge audit processes and deliverables. To fulfil its responsibility for oversight of the external audit process the Committee considered and reviewed: • the Auditor’s engagement letter; • the Auditor’s proposed audit strategy; • the audit fee; and • a report from the Auditor on the conclusion of theaudit. BDO LLP, has been engaged as the Company’s Auditor since 2017. The audit partners responsible for the audit are rotated at least every five years in accordance with professional and regulatory standards in order to protect independence and objectivity and to provide fresh challenge to the business. Chris Meyrick is the lead audit partner and has held the role since January 2022. BDO LLP has confirmed that it believes it is independent within the meaning of regulatory and professional requirements and that the objectivity of the audit partner and staff is not impaired. Having carried out the review process described above, the Committee is satisfied that the Auditor has remained independent and effective. There are no contractual obligations restricting the Committee’s choice of external Auditor. Accountability and audit The respective responsibilities of the Directors and the Auditor in connection with the Financial Statements are set out on pages 72 to 81. On behalf of the Board Andrew Watkins Audit Committee Chairman 8 December 2025 Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 68 Directors’ remuneration report Statement by the Chairman The Directors’ Remuneration Policy is subject toshareholder approval every three years or sooner ifan alteration to the policy is proposed. The Remuneration Policy, which is set out below, was approved at the Annual General Meeting in February 2023 and no changes are proposed to the policy to be approved at the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2026. Directors’ fees were last increased on 1October 2023. The Board reviewed the level of fees during the year and agreed that the Directors fees would be increased, to £48,000 in relation to the Chairman, £32,500 in relation to each non-executive director and an additional payment of £8,000 in relation to the Chair of the Audit Committee. The fee increases would be effective from 1 October 2025, being the start of the Company’s next financial year. Directors’ remuneration policy The Company follows the recommendation of theAIC Code that Directors’ remuneration should reflect their duties, responsibilities and the value of their time spent on the Company’s affairs. The Board’s policy is that the remuneration of the Directors should reflect the experience of the Board as a whole and be determined with reference to comparable organisations and appointments. The Board has set three levels of fees: one for the Chairman, one for the other Directors, and an additional fee that is paid to the Director who chairsthe Audit Committee. Fees are reviewed annually in accordance with the policy. The fee for any new Director appointed will be determined on the same basis. Any views expressed by shareholders on the fees being paid to Directors will be taken into consideration by the Board when reviewing the Directors’ Remuneration Policy and in the annual review of Directors’ fees. This report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. 69 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc The Directors are not eligible for bonuses, pensionbenefits, share options, long-term incentive schemes or other benefits, as the Board does not consider such arrangements or benefits necessary or appropriate for non-executive Directors. Under the Articles of Association, Directors are entitled to be paid for all reasonable travel, hotel and incidental expenses incurred in or about the performance of their duties as Directors, including expenses incurred in attending Board or shareholdermeetings. If any Director is called upon to perform extra or special services of any kind, under the Articles of Association, they shall be entitled to receive such extra remuneration as the Board may decide in addition to any remuneration they may be entitled toreceive. The Company does not enter into service contracts with its Directors. Instead, the Company has a policy of entering into a letter of appointment with each of its Directors, copies of which are available on request from the Company Secretary. It is intended that the Company’s policy when determining the duration of notice periods and termination payments under the Directors’ letters of appointment will bebased on prevailing best practice guidelines. Under the Directors’ letters of appointment, there isa notice period of one month and no compensation is payable to a Director on leaving office. No compensation is payable in the event of atakeover bid. The terms of their appointment provide that all Directors shall retire and be subject to election at the first Annual General Meeting after their appointment. Thereafter, at each AGM any Director who has not stood for appointment or re-election at either of the two preceding AGMs is required to retire and offer themselves for re-election. Beyond these requirements, it has been agreed that all Directors will seek annual re-election at the Company’s AGMs. Limits on Directors’ remuneration The fees for the non-executive Directors are payable monthly in arrears and are determined within the limit set out in the Company’s Articles of Association which is currently £200,000 per annum in aggregate. Any change to this limit requires shareholder approval. The fees paid in respect of the year ended 30September 2025 together with the expected fees payable in respect of the year ending 30 September 2026 are set out in the table below. The fees payable to the Directors in the subsequent financial years will be determined following an annual review of the Directors’ fees. Expected fees for year ending 30 September 2026 £ Fees paid for the year to 30 September 2025 £ Chairman’s fee 48,000 44,000 Non-executive Director’s fee 32,500 30,000 Additional fee for the Chairman of the Audit Committee 8,000 6,000 Total aggregate annual fees that can be paid to the Directors in any year under the Directors’ Remuneration Policy, as set out in the Company’s Articles of Association 200,000 200,000 Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 70 Annual report on remuneration An ordinary resolution for the approval of this report will be put to the members at the forthcoming AnnualGeneral Meeting. The law requires the Company’s Auditor to audit certain of the disclosures provided in this report. Wheredisclosures have been audited, they are indicated as such. The Auditor’s opinion is included intheIndependent Auditor’s report on pages 75 to 81. Directors’ remuneration for the year (audited) The Directors who served during the year received the following remuneration in the form of fees and taxable benefits. This represents the entire remuneration paid to the Directors. Name 2025 Fees £ 2025 Taxable benefits £ 2025 Total £ 2024 Fees £ 2024 Taxable benefits £ 2024 Total £ David Barron † 39,217 3,685 42,902 30,000 2,560 32,560 Davina Curling # 27,500 2,769 30,269 – – – Emma Davies 30,000 4,079 34,079 30,000 1,912 31,912 Andrew Watkins 36,000 1,465 37,465 34,231 3,099 37,330 Michael MacPhee ‡ 15,217 368 15,585 44,000 1,839 45,839 Michael Woodward ¶ – – – 10,938 1,338 12,276 147,934 12,366 160,300 149,169 10,748 159,917 * Comprises expenses incurred by Directors in the course of travel to attend Board and Committee meetings held at the Company’s normal place of business. These amounts have been grossed up for applicable income tax and national insurance. † Appointed as Chairman 5 February 2025. # Appointed 1 November 2024. ‡ Retired 5 February 2025. ¶ Retired 18 January 2024. Annual percentage change in remuneration This represents the annual percentage change in the entire remuneration paid to the Directors. Name % from 2024 to 2025 % from 2023 to 2024 % from 2022 to 2023 % from 2021 to 2022 % from 2020 to 2021 David Barron * 32 – – – – Davina Curling † – – – – – Emma Davies # 7 13 2 37 – Andrew Watkins ‡ 1 31 1 4 20 Michael MacPhee ¶ (66) 11 2 1 20 * Appointed to the Board 1 October 2023 and appointed as Chairman on 5 February 2025. † Appointed 1 November 2024. # Appointed 1 January 2021. ‡ Appointed 1 January 2019. ¶ Retired 5 February 2025. 71 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Company performance The following graph compares the share price total return (assuming all dividends are reinvested) to ordinary shareholders compared with the total shareholder return on a notional investment made up of shares in the component parts of the FTSE Europe ex UK Index. This index was chosen for comparison purposes as it is a widely used measure of performance for European listed companies and also the index against which the Company measures its performance. Performance graph (figures rebased to 100 at 30 September 2015) Cumulative to 30 September 20252015 2017 2019 2021 2023 ● Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust’s share price Source: LSEG and relevant underlying index providers. See disclaimer on page 114. All figures are total returns (assuming net dividends are reinvested). See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. ● FTSE Europe ex UK Index (in sterling terms) 0 300 150 100 50 250 200 Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Approval The Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages68 to 71 was approved by the Board of Directors andsigned on its behalf on 8December 2025. David Barron Chairman Directors’ interests (audited) The Directors at the end of the year under review, and their interests in the Company, are shown in the following table. There is no requirement under the Company’s Articles of Association for Directors to hold shares in the Company. There have been no changes intimated in the Directors’ interests up to 4December 2025. Name Nature of interest Ordinary 2.5p shares held at 30 September 2025 Ordinary 2.5p shares held at 30 September 2024 David Barron Beneficial 20,600 – Davina Curling – – – Emma Davies Beneficial 20,505 20,505 Andrew Watkins Beneficial 25,000 15,000 Michael MacPhee † Beneficial – 756,950 * Appointed 1 November 2024. † Retired 5 February 2025. Statement of voting at Annual General Meeting At the last Annual General Meeting, of the proxy votes received in respect of the Directors’ Remuneration Report, 99.2% were in favour, 0.5%were against and votes withheld were 0.3%. At the last Annual General Meeting at which the Directors’ Remuneration Policy was considered (February 2023), 99.2% of the proxy votes received were in favour, 0.6% were against and 0.2% votes were withheld. Relative importance of spend on pay The table below shows the actual expenditure (fees and taxable benefits) during the year in relation to Directors’ remuneration and distributions to shareholders. 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Change % Directors’ remuneration 160 160 – Dividends 2,338 2,111 11 Share buy backs 26,852 6,001 347 Governance report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 72 The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the Financial Statements and the Directors’ remuneration report comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of Financial Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities. Under applicable laws and regulations, the Directors are also responsible for preparing a Strategic report, Directors’ report, Directors’ remuneration report and Corporate governance statement that complies with those laws and regulations. In accordance with Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 4.1.14R, the Financial Statements will form part of the annual financial report prepared using the single electronic reporting format under the TD ESEF Regulation. The Auditor’s report on these Financial Statements provides no assurance over the ESEF format. The Directors are responsible for ensuring that the Annual Report and Financial Statements are made available on a website. Financial Statements are published on the Company’s website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of Financial Statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the Company’s page of the Managers’ website is the responsibility of the Directors. The Directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the Financial Statements contained therein. The Directors have delegated responsibility to the Managers for the maintenance and integrity of the Company’s page of the Managers’ website. The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Company law requires the Directors to prepare Financial Statements for each financial year. Underthat law they have elected to prepare the Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising Financial Reporting Standard 102 ‘TheFinancial Reporting Standard Applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland’ (FRS 102). Under company law the Directors must not approve the Financial Statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of its profit or loss for that year. In preparing these Financial Statements, the Directors are required to: • select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; • state whether applicable United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 102, have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Financial Statements; • make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and • prepare the Financial Statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business. Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and the Financial Statements 73 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Responsibility Statement of the Directors inrespect of the Annual Financial Report We confirm that, to the best of our knowledge: • the Financial Statements, prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and net return of the Company; • the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties it faces; and • the Annual Report and Financial Statements, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy. On behalf of the Board David Barron 8 December 2025 Financial report The Financial Statements for the year to 30 September 2025 are set out on pages 82 to 101 and have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102 ‘The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland’. 75 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Independent auditor’s report to the members of Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with our reporting to the audit committee. Independence Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the members on 24January 2017 to audit the Financial Statements for the year ended 30September 2017 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement including retenders and reappointments is 9 years, covering the years ended 30September 2017 to 30September 2025. We remain independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the Financial Statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. The non-audit services prohibited by that standard were not provided to theCompany. Opinion on the Financial Statements In our opinion the Financial Statements: • give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 30 September 2025 and of its profit for the year then ended; • have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and • have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. We have audited the Financials Statements of Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc (the ‘Company’) for the year ended 30 September 2025 which comprise the Income Statement, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Cash Flow Statement and notes to the Financial Statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102, The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice). Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 76 Overview 2025 2024 Key audit matters Valuation and ownership of listed and unlisted investments Materiality Company Financial Statements asawhole £3.5m (2024: £3.6m) based on 1% (2024: 1%) of net assets An overview of the scope of our audit Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Company and its environment, including the Company’s system of internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the Financial Statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of materialmisstatement. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the Financial Statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit, and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Financial Statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. Conclusions relating to going concern In auditing the Financial Statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the Financial Statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included: • Evaluating the appropriateness of the Directors’ method of assessing the going concern in light of economic and market conditions by reviewing the information used by the Directors in completing their assessment; • Reviewing the loan agreements to identify the covenants and assessing the likelihood of them being breached based on the Directors’ forecasts and our sensitivity analyses; • Assessment of the availability of cash and the liquidity of the investment portfolio in relation to its ability to meet expected cash outflows over at least the next twelve months; and • Challenging the appropriateness of the Directors’ assumptions and judgements made with regards to forecasts, including stress-testing forecasts which included consideration of the covenant headroom. Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the Financial Statements are authorised for issue. In relation to the Company’s reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the Financial Statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis ofaccounting. Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report. 77 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Key audit matter How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter Valuation and ownership of listed and unlisted investments (Note 1 and 9) We considered the valuation and ownership of listed and unlisted investments to be the most important audit area as investments represent the most significant balance in the Financial Statements and underpin the principal activity of the Company. The investment portfolio at the year-end comprised of listed and unlisted equity investments. There is a risk that the prices used for the listed investments held by the Company are not reflective of fair value. We do not consider the use of bid price as a proxy for fair value of listed investments to be subject to significant estimation uncertainty. Significant judgment is required in determining the valuation methodology for unlisted investments, and their valuations are subject to estimation uncertainty. There is also a risk of error in the recording of investment holdings such that those records do not appropriately reflect the property of the Company. For these reasons and the materiality to the Financial Statements as a whole, the valuation and ownership of listed and unlisted investments are considered to be a key area of our overall audit strategy and allocation of our resources and hence a Key Audit Matter. We responded to this matter by testing the valuation and ownership of the whole portfolio of listed and unlisted investments. In relation to the listed investments, we performed the following procedures: • Confirmed the year-end bid price was used by agreeing to externally quoted prices; • Assessed if there were contra indicators, such as liquidity considerations, to suggest bid price is not the most appropriate indication of fair value by considering the realisation period for individual holdings; • Recalculated the valuation by multiplying the number of shares held per the statement obtained from the custodian by the share price; • Obtained direct confirmation of the number of shares held per equity investment from the custodian regarding all investments held at the balance sheet date; and • Agreed the exchange rates used to independent sources. In relation to the unlisted investments, we performed the following procedures: • Assessed the design and implementation of controls over the unlisted investment valuations; • Considered the appropriateness of the valuation methodology applied by the AIFM under the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation IPEV’) Guidelines and applicable accounting standards; • Reviewed the valuations prepared by Baillie Gifford & Co (‘the Manager’) and challenged and corroborated the inputs to the valuation with reference to management information on investee companies, market data and our own understanding of the investee companies and assessed the impact of the estimation uncertainty concerning these assumptions; • Verified the exchange rates used to independent sources; and • Agreed the holdings either to independently received third-party confirmation from the custodian or confirmation from the underlying investee companies, to confirm ownership. For unlisted investments that were valued using calibrated price of recent investment reviewed for changes, we performed the following: • Verified the price of recent investment transaction to supporting documentation; • Considered whether the investment transaction was an arm’s length transaction through reviewing the parties involved in the transaction and checking whether or not they were already investors in the investee company. • Considered whether there were any indications that the price of recent investment transaction was no longer representative of fair value considering, inter alia, the current performance of the investee company and the milestones and assumptions set out in the investment proposal; and • Considered whether the price of recent investment transaction is supported by alternative valuation techniques as well as the time lapsed/ calibration since the investment round. Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 78 Key audit matter How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter For unlisted investments that were valued using a market approach (multiples, industry valuation benchmarks and available market prices), we performed the following: • Challenged and corroborated the inputs to the valuation with reference to management information of investee companies, market data and our own understanding; • Reviewed the historical Financial Statements and any recent management information available to support assumptions about maintainable revenues, earnings or cash flows used in the valuations; • Considered the multiples applied and the discounts applied by reference to observable quoted company market data; • Challenged the consistency and appropriateness of adjustments made to such market data in establishing the revenue, cash flow or earnings multiple applied in arriving at the valuations adopted by considering the individual performance of investee companies against plan and relative to the peer group, the market and sector in which the investee company operates and other factors as appropriate; • For investments being valued using the benchmarking method, we have considered the appropriateness of the benchmark index applied; • For investments being valued using the benchmarking method, we have also considered the consistency of the benchmark being applied; and • Where an insolvency risk discount has been applied, we have considered the reasonability of the discount for the applicable investment. Where appropriate, we performed stress and reverse stress tests to determine materiality of possible movements in selected inputs. We have also performed scenario analysis, by developing our own point estimates and evaluating acceptable ranges of valuations, where we considered that alternative input assumptions could reasonably have been applied. We have considered the overall impact of such scenarios on the portfolio of investments in determining whether the valuations, as a whole, arereasonable. Key observations: Based on our procedures performed we did not identify any matters to suggest the valuation or ownership of the listed and unlisted equity investments was not appropriate. Our application of materiality We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the Financial Statements. In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality level, performance materiality, to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the Financial Statements as a whole. Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the Financial Statements as a whole and performance materiality as follows: Company Financial Statements 2025 2024 Materiality £3.5 million £3.6 million Basis for determining materiality 1% of Net assets 1% of Net assets Rationale for the benchmark applied As an investment trust, the net asset value is the key measure of performance for users of the Financial Statements and reflects the fact that debt is present in the Company. Performance materiality £2.6 million £2.7 million Basis for determining performance materiality 75% of materiality 75% of materiality Rationale for the percentage applied for performance materiality The level of performance materiality applied was set after having considered a number of factors including the expected total value of known and likely misstatements and the level of transactions in the year. 79 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Going concern and longer-term viability • The Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material uncertainties identified set out on page 63; and • The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate set out on page 31. Other Code provisions • Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 73; • Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on pages 32 to 36; • The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems set out on pages 62 and 63; and • The section describing the work of the Audit Committee set out on pages 65 and 66. Other Companies Act 2006 reporting Based on the responsibilities described below and our work performed during the course of the audit, we are required by the Companies Act 2006 and ISAs (UK) to report on certain opinions and matters as described below. Strategic report and Directors’ report In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit: • the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the Financial Statements are prepared is consistent with the Financial Statements; and • the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements. In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the Directors’ report. Directors’ remuneration In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006. Matters on which we are required to report by exception We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion: • adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or • the Financial Statements and the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or • certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or • we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit. Reporting threshold We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all individual audit differences in excess of £170,000 (2024: £180,000). We also agreed to report differences below this threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. Other information The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual report other than the Financial Statements and our Auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the Financial Statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the Financial Statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard. Corporate governance statement The UK Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit. Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 80 Responsibilities of Directors As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the Financial Statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of Financial Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the Financial Statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Financial Statements. Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below: Non-compliance with laws and regulations Based on: • Our understanding of the Company and the industry in which it operates; • Discussion with the Investment Manager and those charged with Governance (including the Audit Committee); and • Obtaining and understanding of the Company’s policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations we considered the significant laws and regulations to be Companies Act 2006, the FCA listing and DTR rules, the principles of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance, industry practice represented by the AIC SORP, the applicable accounting framework, and qualification as an Investment Trust under UK tax legislation as any non-compliance of this would lead to the Company losing various deductions and exemptions from corporation tax. Our procedures in respect of the above included: • Agreement of the financial statement disclosures to underlying supporting documentation; • Enquiries of the Investment Manager and those charged with Governance relating to the existence of any non-compliance with laws and regulations; • Reviewing minutes of meeting of those charged with Governance throughout the period for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations; and • Reviewing the calculation in relation to Investment Trust compliance to check that the Company was meeting its requirements to retain their Investment Trust Status. Fraud We assessed the susceptibility of the Financial Statements to material misstatement including fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included: • Enquiry with the Investment Manager and those charged with Governance (including the Audit Committee) regarding any known or suspected instances of fraud; • Obtaining an understanding of the Company’s policies and procedures relating to: – Detecting and responding to the risks of fraud; and – Internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud. • Review of minutes of meetings of those charged with Governance for any known or suspected instances of fraud; and • Discussion amongst the engagement team as to how and where fraud might occur in the Financial Statements. Based on our risk assessment, we considered the areas most susceptible to be the valuation of unlisted investments and management override ofcontrols. 81 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Our procedures in respect of the above included: • In addressing the risk of the valuation of unlisted investments, the procedures set out in the Key Audit Matters section above; • In addressing the risk of management override of controls, we performed the following: – Performed a review of estimates and judgements applied by the Investment Manager in the Financial Statements to assess their appropriateness and the existence of any systematic bias; – Considered the opportunity and incentive to manipulate accounting entries and target tested relevant adjustments made in the period end financial reporting process; – Reviewed for significant transactions outside the normal course of business; and – Performed a review of unadjusted differences, if any, for indications of bias or deliberate misstatement. We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members who were all deemed to have appropriate competence and capabilities and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non- compliance with laws and regulations throughout theaudit. Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the Financial Statements, recognising that the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the Financial Statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it. A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report. Use of our report This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed. Chris Meyrick (Senior Statutory Auditor) For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor London, UK 8 December 2025 BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127). Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 82 For the year ended 30 September Notes 2025 Revenue £’000 2025 Capital £’000 2025 Total £’000 2024 Revenue £’000 2024 Capital £’000 2024 Total £’000 Gains on investments 9 – 18,082 18,082 – 43,968 43,968 Currency gains/(losses) 14 46 (2,251) (2,205) (51) 2,073 2,022 Income 2 4,063 – 4,063 4,013 – 4,013 Investment management fee 3 (355) (1,421) (1,776) (370) (1,477) (1,847) Other administrative expenses 4 (626) – (626) (630) – (630) Net return before finance costs and taxation 3,128 14,410 17,538 2,962 44,564 47,526 Finance costs of borrowings 5 (161) (643) (804) (160) (640) (800) Net return before taxation 2,967 13,767 16,734 2,802 43,924 46,726 Tax on ordinary activities 6 (305) – (305) (255) – (255) Net return after taxation 2,662 13,767 16,429 2,547 43,924 46,471 Net return per ordinary share 7 0.78p 4.03p 4.81p 0.72p 12.35p 13.07p The total column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. The supplementary revenue and capital return columns are prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies. All revenue and capital items in this statement derive from continuing operations. A Statement of Comprehensive Income is not required as all gains and losses of the Company have been reflected in the above statement. The accompanying notes on pages 86 to 101 are an integral part of the Financial Statements. Income statement 83 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc As at 30 September As at 30 September Notes 2025 £’000 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 2024 £’000 Fixed assets Investments held at fair value through profit or loss 9 403,155 413,975 Current assets Debtors 10 3,545 1,331 Cash at bank 19 2,807 1,856 6,352 3,187 Creditors Amounts falling due within one year 11 (3,300) (887) Net current assets 3,052 2,300 Total assets less current liabilities 406,207 416,275 Creditors Amounts falling due after more than one year 12 (52,291) (49,844) Net assets 353,916 366,431 Capital and reserves Share capital 13 10,061 10,061 Share premium account 14 125,050 125,050 Capital redemption reserve 14 8,750 8,750 Capital reserve 14 201,053 214,138 Revenue reserve 14 9,002 8,432 Shareholders’ funds 353,916 366,431 Net asset value per ordinary share (borrowings at book value) 15 109.0p 104.2p Net asset value per ordinary share (borrowings at fair value) 113.3p 108.0p The Financial Statements of Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc (Company registration number 1055384) were approved and authorised for issue by the Board and were signed on 8 December 2025. David Barron Chairman The accompanying notes on pages 86 to 101 are an integral part of the Financial Statements. * See Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on pages 116 to 118. Balance sheet Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 84 For the year ended 30 September 2025 Notes Share capital £’000 Share premium account £’000 Capital redemption reserve £’000 Capital reserve £’000 Revenue reserve £’000 Shareholders’ funds £’000 Shareholders’ funds at 1 October 2024 10,061 125,050 8,750 214,138 8,432 366,431 Dividends paid during the year 8 – – – – (2,092) (2,092) Shares bought back into treasury 13 – – – (26,852) – (26,852) Net return aftertaxation 14 – – – 13,767 2,662 16,429 Shareholders’ funds at 30 September 2025 10,061 125,050 8,750 201,053 9,002 353,916 For the year ended 30 September 2024 Notes Share capital £’000 Share premium account £’000 Capital redemption reserve £’000 Capital reserve £’000 Revenue reserve £’000 Shareholders’ funds £’000 Shareholders’ funds at 1 October 2023 10,061 125,050 8,750 176,215 7,314 327,390 Dividends paid during the year 8 – – – – (1,429) (1,429) Shares bought back into treasury 13 – – – (6,001) – (6,001) Net return aftertaxation 14 – – – 43,924 2,547 46,471 Shareholders’ funds at 30 September 2024 10,061 125,050 8,750 214,138 8,432 366,431 The accompanying notes on pages 86 to 101 are an integral part of the Financial Statements. Statement of changes in equity 85 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc * Change in debtors is made up of changes in accrued income, prepaid expenses and taxation recoverable (excluding overseas withholding tax received in the year) – see note 10. Change in creditors is made up of changes in other creditors and accruals – see note 11. † Cash from operations includes dividends received of £3,925,000 (2024 – £3,760,000) and interest received of £22,000 (2024 – £75,000). # Acquisitions of investments is made up of the current year purchases at cost (see note 9), plus opening purchases for subsequent settlement, less closing purchases for subsequent settlement (see note 11). Disposals of investments is made up of the current year sales proceeds (see note 9), plus opening investment sales awaiting settlement, less closing investment sales awaiting settlement (see note 10). The accompanying notes on pages 86 to 101 are an integral part of the Financial Statements. For the year ended 30 September Notes 2025 £’000 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 2024 £’000 Cash flows from operating activities Net return before taxation 16,734 46,726 Adjustments to reconcile company profit before tax to net cash flow from operating activities Net gains on investments (18,082) (43,968) Currency losses/(gains) 2,251 (2,073) Finance costs of borrowings 804 800 Other capital movements Changes in debtors * (318) (149) Changes in creditors * – 73 Taxation Overseas withholding tax suffered (305) (255) Overseas withholding tax reclaims received 268 240 Cash from operations † 1,352 1,394 Interest paid (788) (804) Net cash inflow from operating activities 564 590 Cash flows from investing activities Acquisitions of investments # (95,425) (82,256) Disposals of investments # 124,261 90,091 Net cash inflow from investing activities 28,836 7,835 Cash flows from financing activities Shares bought back into treasury (26,548) (5,998) Equity dividends paid (2,092) (1,429) Net cash outflow from financing activities (28,640) (7,427) Increase in cash at bank 760 998 Exchange movements 191 (49) Cash at bank at start of period 1,856 907 Cash at bank at end of period 2,807 1,856 Cash flow statement Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 86 01 Principal accounting policies The Financial Statements for the year to 30 September2025 have been prepared in accordance with FRS 102 ‘The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland’ on the basis of the accounting policies setout below which are consistent with those applied for theyear ended 30 September 2024. a. Basis of accounting All of the Company’s operations are of a continuing nature and the Financial Statements are prepared on a going concern basis under the historical cost convention, modified to include the revaluation of fixed asset investments and on the assumption that approval as an investment trust under section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) (Tax) Regulations 2011 will be retained. The Board has, in particular, considered the impact of heightened market volatility due to macroeconomic and geopolitical concerns, but does not believe the Company’s going concern status is affected. The Company’s assets, which at present are mainly investments in quoted securities which are readily realisable, exceed its liabilities significantly. All borrowings require the prior approval of the Board. Gearing levels and compliance with borrowing covenants are reviewed by the Board on a regular basis. The Company has continued to comply with the investment trust status requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the Investment Trust (Approved Company) (Tax) Regulations 2011. The Company’s primary third party suppliers, including its Managers and Secretaries, Custodian, Depositary, Registrar, Auditor and Corporate Broker, are not experiencing significant operational difficulties affecting their respective services to the Company. Accordingly, the Financial Statements have been prepared on the going concern basis as it is the Directors’ opinion, having assessed the principal and emerging risks and other matters as set out in the Viability Statement on page 31, that the Company will continue in operational existence for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of these Financial Statements. The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006, applicable UK Accounting Standards and with the AIC’s Statement of Recommended Practice ‘Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts’ issued in November 2014 and updated in July 2022. In order to reflect better the activities of the Company and in accordance with guidance issued by the AIC, supplementary information which analyses the Income statement between items of a revenue and capital nature has been presented. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised inthe Company’s Balance sheet when it becomes aparty to the contractual provisions of the instrument. The Directors consider the Company’s functional currency to be sterling as the entity is listed on a sterling stock exchange in the UK, the Company’s share capital and dividends paid are denominated in sterling, the Company’s shareholders are predominantly based in the UK and the Company and its Investment Manager, which are subject to the UK’s regulatory environment, are also UK based. b. Significant accounting estimates and judgements The preparation of the Financial Statements requires the use of estimates, assumptions and judgements. These estimates, assumptions and judgements affect thereported amounts of assets and liabilities, at the reporting date. While estimates are based on best judgement using information and financial data available,the actual outcome may differ from these estimates. The key sources of estimation and uncertainty relate to the assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the unlisted investments, which are detailed in note 9 on page 91. Judgements The Directors consider that the preparation of theFinancial Statements involves the following keyjudgements: i. the determination of the functional currency of the Company as sterling (see rationale in 1(a) above); and ii. the fair valuation of the unlisted investments. The key judgements in the fair valuation process are: i. the Managers’ determination of the appropriate application of the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Guidelines 2022 (IPEV Guidelines) toeach unlisted investment; and ii. the Directors’ consideration of whether each fair value is appropriate following detailed review and challenge. The judgement applied in the selection of the methodology used for determining the fair value of each unlisted investment can have a significant impact upon the valuation. Notes to the Financial Statements 87 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Estimates The key estimate in the Financial Statements is the determination of the fair value of the unlisted investments by the Managers for consideration by the Directors. This estimate is key as it significantly impacts the valuation of the unlisted investments at the Balance Sheet date. The fair valuation process involves estimation using subjective inputs that are unobservable (for which market data is unavailable). The main estimates involved in the selection of the valuation process inputs are: i. the selection of appropriate comparable companies in order to derive revenue multiples and meaningful relationships between enterprise value, revenue and earnings growth. Comparable companies are chosen onthe basis of their business characteristics and growth patterns; ii. the selection of a revenue metric (either historic orforecast); iii. the application of an appropriate discount factor toreflect the reduced liquidity of unlisted companies versus their listed peers; iv. the estimation of the probability assigned to an exitbeing through an initial public offering (‘IPO’) oracompany sale; v. the selection of an appropriate industry benchmark index to assist with the valuation validation or the application of valuation adjustments, particularly in the absence of established earnings or closely comparable peers; and vi. the calculation of valuation adjustments derived from milestone analysis (i.e. incorporating operational success against the plan/forecasts of the business intothe valuation), or to capture the risk of insolvency events at a specific company. c. Investments The Company’s investments are classified as held at fair value through profit and loss in accordance with sections 11 and 12 of FRS 102. Purchases and sales of investments are recognised on a trade date basis. Expenses incidental to the purchase and sale of investments are recognised inthe Income Statement as capital items. Investments are designated as held at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition and are measured at subsequent reporting dates at fair value. The fair value of listed security investments is bid price or last traded price. Unlisted investments are valued at fair value by the Directors following a detailed review and appropriate challenge of the valuations proposed by the Managers. The Managers’ unlisted investment policy applies methodologies consistent with IPEV Guidelines. These methodologies can be categorised as follows (a) market approach (multiples, industry valuation benchmarks and available market prices); (b) income approach (discounted cash flows); and (c) replacement cost approach (net assets). The valuation process recognises also, as stated in the IPEV Guidelines, that the price of a recent investment may be an appropriate starting point for estimating fair value, however it should be evaluated usingthe techniques described above. d. Cash at bank Cash at bank include cash in hand and deposits repayable on demand. Deposits are repayable on demand if they can be withdrawn at any time without notice and without penalty or if they have a maturity orperiod of notice of not more than one working day. e. Income i. Income from equity investments is brought into account on the date on which the investments are quoted ex-dividend or, where no ex-dividend date is quoted, when the Company’s right to receive payment is established. ii. Special dividends are treated as repayments of capital or income depending on the facts of each particular case. iii. Interest receivable/payable on bank deposits isrecognised on an accruals basis. iv. Overseas dividends include the taxes deducted atsource. v. If scrip is taken in lieu of dividends in cash, the net amount of the cash dividend declared is credited to the revenue account. Any excess in the value of the shares received over the amount of the cash dividend foregone is recognised as capital. vi. Interest from fixed interest securities is recognised onan effective yield basis. f. Expenses All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are charged through the revenue account except: i. where they relate directly to the acquisition or disposal of an investment in which case they are recognised as capital within losses/gains on investments. These expenses are commonly referred to as transaction costs and comprise brokerage commission and stamp duty. Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 88 ii. where they relate directly to the buy-back/issuance of shares, in which case they are added to the buy-back cost or deducted from the share issuance proceeds. The management fee is allocated 20% to revenue and 80% to capital in line with the Board’s expected long- term split of revenue and capital return from the Company’s investment portfolio. The Board reviews the expense allocation policy on a yearly basis and considers whether it remains appropriate. g. Long term borrowings, overdrafts and finance costs Unsecured loan notes and overdrafts are classified as loans and are measured at amortised cost. They are initially recorded at the par value of proceeds received net of direct costs. Finance costs are accounted for on an accruals basis and on an effective interest basis and are allocated 20% to revenue and 80% to capital in line with the Board’s expected long-term split of revenue and capital return from the Company’s investment portfolio. The Board reviews the expense allocation policy on a yearly basis and considers whether it remains appropriate. h. Taxation The taxation charge represents the sum of current tax and the movement in the provision for deferred taxation during the year. Current taxation represents non-recoverable overseas taxes which is charged to the revenue account where it relates to income received and to capital where it relates to items of a capital nature. Deferred taxation is provided on all timing differences which have originated but not reversed by the Balance Sheet date, calculated on a non-discounted basis at the tax rates expected to apply when the timing differences reverse, based on what has been enacted or substantively enacted, relevant to the benefit or liability. Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is more likely than not that there will be taxable profits from which underlying timing differences can be deducted. i. Dividend distributions Final dividends are recognised in the year in which the dividends are approved by the Company’s shareholders ina General Meeting. Interim dividends are recognised in the year in which they are paid. j. Foreign currencies Transactions involving foreign currencies are converted at the rate ruling at the time of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities and fixed asset investment in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rates of exchange at the Balance Sheet date. Any gain or loss arising from a change in exchange rate subsequent to the date of the transaction is included as an exchange gain or loss in the Income Statement as capital or revenue as appropriate to the transaction. k. Capital reserve Gains and losses on disposal of investments, changes in the fair value of investments held, exchange differences of a capital nature and the amount by which other assets and liabilities valued at fair value differ from their book cost are dealt with in the capital reserve. Purchases of theCompany’s own shares are also funded from this reserve. The nominal value of such shares is transferred from share capital to the capital redemption reserve ifthe shares are subsequently cancelled. 80% of management fees and finance costs have been allocated to the capital reserve. The capital reserve, to the extent it constitutes realised profits, is distributable. l. Share premium The share premium reserve represents the excess of the issue price over the nominal value of shares issued less transaction costs incurred on the issue of the shares. m. Capital redemption reserve The nominal value of ordinary share capital purchased and cancelled is transferred out of called-up share capital and into the capital redemption reserve on the relevant trade date. n. Revenue reserve The revenue profit or loss for the year is taken to or from this reserve. The revenue reserve may be distributed by way of a dividend. o. Single segment reporting The Company is engaged in a single segment of business, being investment, consequently no business segmental analysis is provided. 89 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 02 Income 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Income from investments Overseas dividends 4,018 3,818 Overseas interest 23 120 Other income Interest 22 75 Total income 4,063 4,013 03 Investment management fee 2025 Revenue £’000 2025 Capital £’000 2025 Total £’000 2024 Revenue £’000 2024 Capital £’000 2024 Total £’000 Investment management fee 355 1,421 1,776 370 1,477 1,847 Details of the Investment Management Agreement are disclosed on pages 53 and 54. Baillie Gifford & Co Limited’s annual management fee is 0.55% of the lower of (i) the Company’s market capitalisation and (ii) the Company’s net asset value (which shall include income), in either case up to £500 million, and 0.50% of the amount of the lower of the Company’s market capitalisation or net asset value above £500 million, calculated and payable quarterly. 04 Other administrative expenses 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 General administrative expenses 168 188 Directors’ fees (see Directors’ remuneration report on page 70) 148 149 Marketing 100 95 Custody 92 77 Auditor’s remuneration – statutory audit of Company’s Annual Financial Statements 57 54 Depositary 37 38 Registrars 24 29 626 630 * The Company is part of a marketing programme which includes all the Investment Trusts managed by the Manager. The marketing strategy has an ongoing objective to stimulate demand for the Company’s shares. The cost of this marketing strategy is borne in partnership by the Company and the Manager. The Manager matches the Company’s marketing contribution and provides the resource to manage and run the programme. 05 Finance costs 2025 Revenue £’000 2025 Capital £’000 2025 Total £’000 2024 Revenue £’000 2024 Capital £’000 2024 Total £’000 Overdraft arrangement fee 1 2 3 1 2 3 Loan notes interest 160 641 801 159 638 797 161 643 804 160 640 800 Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 90 06 Tax on ordinary activities 2025 Total £’000 2024 Total £’000 Analysis of charge in year Overseas taxation 305 255 Tax charge 305 255 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Factors affecting tax charge for year The tax charge for the year is lower than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 25%. The differences are explained below: Net revenue return before taxation 2,967 2,802 Net revenue return multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 25% (2024 – 25%) 742 701 Effects of: Income not taxable (1,016) (942) Overseas tax charge 305 255 Taxable losses in year not utilised 274 241 Revenue tax charge for the year 305 255 As an investment trust, the Company’s capital gains are not taxable. Factors that may affect future tax charges At 30 September 2025 the Company had unrelieved losses carried forward of £33,277,000 (2024 – £30,114,000) and had a potential deferred tax asset of £8,319,000 (2024 – £7,529,000) on taxable losses which is available to be carried forward and offset against future taxable profits. A deferred tax asset has not been recognised on these losses as it is considered unlikely that the Company will make taxable revenue profits in the future and it is not liable to tax on its capital gains. The potential deferred tax asset has been calculated using a corporation tax rate of 25% (2024 – 25%). Due to the Company’s status as an investment trust, and the intention to continue meeting the conditions required to obtain approval in the foreseeable future, the Company has not provided for deferred tax on any capital gains and losses arising ontherevaluation or disposal of investments. 07 Net return per ordinary share 2025 Revenue 2025 Capital 2025 Total 2024 Revenue 2024 Capital 2024 Total Net return per ordinary share 0.78p 4.03p 4.81p 0.72p 12.35p 13.07p Revenue return per ordinary share is based on the net revenue return after taxation of £2,662,000 (2024 – £2,547,000), and on 341,427,285 (2024 – 355,716,719) ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during each year. Capital return per ordinary share is based on the net capital gain for the financial year of £13,767,000 (2024 – £43,924,000), and on 341,427,285 (2024 – 355,716,719) ordinary shares, being the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during each year. There are no dilutive or potentially dilutive shares in issue. 91 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 08 Ordinary dividends 2025 2024 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Amounts recognised as distributions in the period: Previous year’s final (paid 14 February 2025) 0.60p 0.40p 2,092 1,429 Also set out below are the total dividends paid and proposed in respect of the financial year, which is the basis on which the requirements of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered. The revenue available for distribution by way of dividend for the year is £2,662,000 (2024 – £2,547,000). 2025 2024 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Dividends paid and proposed in the period: Proposed final dividend per ordinary share (payable13 February 2026) 0.72p 0.6p 2,338 2,111 09 Investments As at 30 September 2025 Level 1 £’000 Level 2 £’000 Level 3 £’000 Total £’000 Securities Listed equities 348,295 – – 348,295 Unlisted equities – – 54,860 54,860 Total financial asset investments 348,295 – 54,860 403,155 As at 30 September 2024 Level 1 £’000 Level 2 £’000 Level 3 £’000 Total £’000 Securities Listed equities 390,500 – – 390,500 Unlisted equities – – 23,475 23,475 Total financial asset investments 390,500 – 23,475 413,975 Investments in securities are financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition. In accordance with FRS 102 the tables above provide an analysis of these investments based on the fair value hierarchy described below which reflects the reliability and significance of the information used to measure their fair value. Fair value hierarchy The levels are determined by the lowest (that is the least reliable or least independently observable) level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement for the individual investment in its entirety as follows: Level 1 – using unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments in an active market; Level 2 – using inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are directly or indirectly observable (based on market data); and Level 3 – using inputs that are unobservable (for which market data is unavailable). The valuation techniques used by the Company are explained in the accounting policies on pages 86 and 87. A sensitivity analysis by valuation technique of the unlisted securities is on pages 98 to 100. Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 92 09 Investments (continued) Listed equities £’000 Unlisted equities £’000 Total £’000 Cost of investments held at 30 September 2024 332,291 30,470 362,761 Investment holding gains/(losses) at 30 September 2024 58,209 (6,995) 51,214 Value of investments held at 30 September 2024 390,500 23,475 413,975 Analysis of transactions made during the year: Purchases at cost 91,950 5,820 97,770 Sales proceeds received (126,672) – (126,672) Gains/(losses) on investments (7,483) 25,565 18,082 Value of investments held at 30 September 2025 348,295 54,860 403,155 Cost of investments held at 30 September 2025 307,868 36,290 344,158 Unrealised appreciation at 30 September 2025 40,427 18,570 58,997 Value of investments held at 30 September 2025 348,295 54,860 403,155 The purchases and sales proceeds figures above include transaction costs of £34,000 (2024 – £41,000) and £48,000 (2024 – £35,000) respectively. During the reporting period, the company converted its £1,964,000 sennder convertible loan notes into 518 Series D preferred shares. This conversion was carried out according to the terms specified in the loan agreement. Before the conversion, interest had accrued on these loan notes, amounting to £246,000. This interest was based on an annual interest rate of 7.455%. The conversion and accrued interest have been reflected in the financial statements, in unlisted investments and income respectively. 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Net gains/(losses) on investments Gains/(losses) on sales 10,298 (39,846) Changes in investment holding gains 7,784 83,814 18,082 43,968 Details of significant holdings are noted below in accordance with the disclosure requirements of paragraph 82 of the AIC Statement of Recommended Practice ‘Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts’ (updated in July 2022), in relation to unlisted investments included in the ten largest holdings within the list of investments disclosed on pages 46 and 47. As required, this disclosure includes turnover, pre tax profits and net assets attributable to investors as reported within the most recently audited financial statements of the investee companies, where possible. At 30 September 2025 Name Business Latest financial statements Proportion of capital owned % Book cost £’000 Market value £’000 Income recognised from holding in the period £’000 Turnover £’000 Pre-tax profit/ (loss) £’000 Net assets attributable to shareholders £’000 Bending Spoons  Mobile application software developer n/a 0.41 4,382 35,298 Nil Information not publicly available * At 30 September 2024 Name Business Latest financial statements Proportion of capital owned % Book cost £’000 Market value £’000 Income recognised from holding in the period £’000 Turnover £’000 Pre-tax profit/ (loss) £’000 Net assets attributable to shareholders £’000 Bending Spoons  Mobile application software developer n/a 0.44 4,382 9,862 Nil Information not publicly available * * Confidentiality agreements prevent the disclosure of this information. 93 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 10 Debtors 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Accrued income and prepaid expenses 160 294 Taxation recoverable 961 1,024 Investment sales awaiting settlement 2,424 13 3,545 1,331 None of the above debtors are financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss. The carrying amount of debtors isareasonable approximation of fair value. 11 Creditors – amounts falling due within one year 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Interest payable 237 226 Purchases for subsequent settlement 2,112 13 Share buy backs payable 306 2 Other creditors and accruals 645 646 3,300 887 None of the above creditors are financial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss. Included in other creditors is £462,000 (2024– £440,000) in respect of the investment management fee. The Company currently has a €30,000,000 bank overdraft credit facility agreement with The Northern Trust Company (the ‘Bank’) for the purpose of pursuing its investment objective. As at 30 September 2025, nil had been drawn down (2024 – nil). The facility is uncommitted. Interest is charged at 1.25% above the European Central Bank Main Financing Rate. The Board has currently agreed to cap a drawdown under this facility at €15,000,000. The maximum aggregate principal amount which may be outstanding under the facility at any time is the lower of €30,000,000 or 20% of the aggregated value of unencumbered assets acceptable to the Bank. The facility contains covenants preventing the Company from creating any security interest over any assets of the Company held by the Bank or incurring any other financial indebtedness without the express permission of the Bank. The Company is required to maintain its status as an investment trust authorised by HMRC and to maintain the appointment of Northern Trust Investor Services as its Depositary. The facility also demands automatic repayment in the event of an unremedied breach by the Company or should the Company become insolvent or subject to insolvency, winding-up or administrative proceedings. There were no breaches of covenants during the year. 12 Creditors – amounts falling due after more than one year 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Unsecured loan notes: €30m 1.55% 24 June 2036 26,162 24,938 €30m 1.57% 8 December 2040 26,129 24,906 52,291 49,844 The Company has €30 million of long-term, fixed rate, senior, unsecured privately placed loan notes, with a fixed coupon of 1.57% to be repaid on 8 December 2040 and a further €30 million of long-term, fixed rate, senior, unsecured privately placed loan notes with a fixed coupon of 1.55% to be repaid on 24 June 2036. The main covenants which are tested monthly are: (i) Net tangible assets shall not fall below £200,000,000. (ii) Total borrowings shall not exceed 30% of the Company’s adjusted assets (as defined by the loan agreement). (iii) The Company’s number of holdings shall not fall below 30. Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 94 13 Share capital 2025 Number 2025 £’000 2024 Number 2024 £’000 Allotted, called up and fully paid ordinary shares of 2.5p each 324,722,867 8,118 351,783,279 8,795 Treasury shares of 2.5p each 77,720,823 1,943 50,660,411 1,266 Total 402,443,690 10,061 402,443,690 10,061 The Company’s shareholder authority permits it to hold shares bought back in treasury. Under such authority, treasury shares maybe subsequently either sold for cash (at a premium to net asset value per ordinary share) or cancelled. At 30 September 2025 the Company had authority to buy back 29,030,386 ordinary shares. During the year to 30 September 2025 no ordinary shares (2024–nil) were bought back for cancellation and 27,060,412 (2024 – 6,365,921) ordinary shares were bought back into treasury at a cost of £26,852,000 (2024 – £6,001,000). Under the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association share buy-backs are funded from the capital reserve. The Company has authority to allot shares under section 551 of the Companies Act 2006. The Board has authorised use of this authority to issue new shares at a premium to net asset value per share in order to enhance the net asset value per share for existing shareholders and improve the liquidity of the Company’s shares. During the year to 30September 2025 no shares were issued (in the year to 30 September 2024 – no shares were issued). 14 Capital and reserves Share capital £’000 Share premium account £’000 Capital redemption reserve £’000 Capital reserve – realised £’000 Capital reserve – unrealised £’000 Revenue reserve £’000 Shareholders’ funds £’000 At 1 October 2024 10,061 125,050 8,750 159,855 54,283 8,432 366,431 Gains on investments – – – 10,299 7, 7 8 3 – 18,082 Investment management fee charged to capital – – – (1,421) – – (1,421) Finance costs charged to capital – – – (643) – – (643) Exchange differences – – – 191 (2,442) – (2,251) Ordinary shares bought back into treasury – – – (26,852) – – (26,852) Dividends paid in year – – – – – (2,092) (2,092) Revenue return after taxation – – – – – 2,662 2,662 At 30 September 2025 10,061 125,050 8,750 141,429 59,624 9,002 353,916 The capital reserve includes unrealised gains of £58,998,000 (2024 – gains of £51,214,000) as disclosed in note 9 and unrealised currency gains of £626,000 (2024 – gains of £3,069,000). The revenue reserve of £9,002,000 (2024 – £8,432,000) and the capital reserve (to the extent it constituents realised profits) of £141,429,000 (2024 – £159,860,000) are distributable. 15 Shareholders’ funds per ordinary share 2025 2024 Shareholders’ funds £353,916,000 £366,431,000 Number of ordinary shares in issue at the year end 324,722,867 351,783,279 Shareholders’ funds per ordinary share 109.0p 104.2p The shareholders’ funds figures above have been calculated after deducting borrowings at book value, in accordance with the provisions of FRS 102 and based on 324,722,867 (2024 – 351,783,279) ordinary shares, being the number of ordinary shares in issue at the year end, excluding shares held in treasury. The net asset value figures shown on the Balance Sheet on page 83 have been calculated after deducting borrowings at either book value or fair value. Reconciliations between shareholders’ funds and both NAV measures are shown in the Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures on page 116. There are nodilutive or potentially dilutive shares in issue. 95 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 16 Analysis of change in net debt 1 October 2024 £’000 Cash flows £’000 Other non-cash changes £’000 Exchange movement £’000 30 September 2025 £’000 Cash at bank 1,856 760 – 191 2,807 Loans due in more than one year (49,844) – (5) (2,442) (52,291) (47,988) 760 (5) (2,251) (49,484) 17 Contingent liabilities, guarantees and financial commitments There were no contingent liabilities, guarantees or financial commitments at the year end (2024 – none). 18 Transactions with related parties and the managers and secretaries The Directors’ fees for the year and interests in the Company’s shares at the end of the year are detailed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 70 and 71. The Directors’ Fees are included in note 4 on page 89. No Director has a contract of service withthe Company. During the years reported, no Director was interested in any contract or other matter requiring disclosure undersection 412 of the Companies Act 2006. The Management fee due to Baillie Gifford & Co Limited is set out in note 3 on page 89 and the amount accrued at 30September2025 is set out in note 11 on page 93. Details of the Investment Management Agreement are set out on page 53. The Company is part of a marketing programme which includes all the investment trusts managed by the Manager. TheCompany’s marketing contribution, recharged by the Manager, was £100,000 (2024 – £95,000) as disclosed in note 4. 19 Financial instruments The Company invests in equities for the long-term so as to achieve its investment objective of long-term capital growth with theaim of providing a total return in excess of the FTSE Europe Ex UK Index. The Company borrows money when the Managers have sufficient conviction that the assets funded by borrowed monies will generate a return in excess of the cost of borrowing. In pursuing its investment objective, the Company is exposed to various types of risk that are associated with the financial instruments and markets in which it invests and could result in a reduction in the Company’s net assets and/or a reduction intheprofits available for dividend. These risks are categorised here as market risk (comprising currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk), liquidity risk andcredit risk. The Board monitors closely the Company’s exposures to these risks but does so in order to reduce the likelihood of a permanent loss of capital rather than to minimise short-term volatility. The risk management policies and procedures outlined in this note have not changed substantially from the previous accountingyear. Market risk The fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument or other investment held by the Company may fluctuate because ofchanges in market prices. This market risk comprises three elements – currency risk, interest rate risk and market price risk. The Board of Directors reviews and agrees policies for managing these risks and the Company’s Investment Manager assesses theexposure to market risk when making individual investment decisions as well as monitoring the overall level of market risk across the investment portfolio on an ongoing basis. Details of the Company’s investment portfolio are shown on pages 46and47. Currency risk The Company’s assets, liabilities and income are denominated in currencies other than sterling (the Company’s functional currency and that in which it reports its results). Consequently, movements in exchange rates may affect the sterling valueofthose items. It is not the Company’s policy to hedge foreign currency risk on a continuing basis but the Company may,and currently does through the euro denominated unsecured loan notes, match overseas investments with foreign currencyborrowings. The Investment Manager monitors the Company’s exposure to foreign currencies and reports to the Board on a regular basis. The Investment Manager assesses the risk to the Company of the foreign currency exposure by considering the effect on the Company’s net asset value and income of a movement in the rates of exchange to which the Company’s assets, liabilities, incomeand expenses are exposed. However, the country in which a company is listed is not necessarily where it earns itsprofits. The movement in exchange rates on overseas earnings may have a more significant impact upon a company’s valuation than asimple translation of the currency in which the company is quoted. Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 96 19 Financial instruments (continued) Exposure to currency risk through asset allocation, which is calculated by reference to the currency in which the asset or liabilityis quoted, is shown below. At 30 September 2025 Investments £’000 Cash and deposits £’000 Loan Notes £’000 Debtors and creditors £’000 Net exposure £’000 Euro 209,890 1,113 (52,291) (1,780) 156,932 Swedish kroner 59,448 – – – 59,448 Swiss franc 37,324 – – 368 37,692 Danish krone 28,357 – – 137 28,494 Polish Zloty 26,724 – – 4 26,728 Canadian dollar 17,016 1,646 – – 18,662 Norwegian krone 14,152 – – – 14,152 US dollar 10,244 – – – 10,244 Total exposure to currency risk 403,155 2,759 (52,291) (1,271) 352,352 Sterling – 48 – (754) (706) 403,155 2,807 (52,291) (2,025) 351,646 At 30 September 2024 Investments £’000 Cash and deposits £’000 Loan Notes £’000 Debtors and creditors £’000 Net exposure £’000 Euro 213,552 1,803 (49,844) 597 166,108 Danish krone 67,298 – – – 67,298 US dollar 36,986 – – 95 37,081 Canadian dollar 21,090 – – – 21,090 Norwegian krone 20,019 – – – 20,019 Polish zloty 17,354 – – 33 17,387 Swiss franc 16,961 – – 321 17,282 US dollar 17,257 – – – 17,257 Total exposure to currency risk 410,517 1,803 (49,844) 1,046 363,522 Sterling 3,458 53 – (602) 2,909 413,975 1,856 (49,844) 444 366,431 Currency Risk Sensitivity At 30 September 2025, if sterling had strengthened by 5% in relation to all currencies, with all other variables held constant, totalnet assets and total return would have decreased by the amounts shown below. A 5% weakening of sterling against all currencies, with all variables held constant, would have had an equal but opposite effect on the Financial Statement amounts. Theanalysis is performed on the same basis for 2024. 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Euro 7,847 8,305 Swedish kroner 2,972 3,365 Swiss franc 1,885 864 Danish krone 1,425 1,854 Polish zloty 1,336 869 Canadian dollar 933 1,055 Norwegian krone 708 1,001 US dollar 512 863 17,618 18,176 97 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 19 Financial instruments (continued) Interest rate risk Interest rate movements may affect the level of income receivable and payable on cash deposits and interest payable on variable rate borrowings and the fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate borrowings. They may also impact upon the market value of the Company’s investments as the effect of interest rate movements upon the earnings of a company may have a significant impact upon the valuation of that company’s equity. The possible effects on cash flows that could arise as a result of changes in interest rates are taken into account when making investment decisions and when entering borrowing agreements. The Board reviews on a regular basis the amount of investments in cash and the income receivable on cash deposits. The Company has the ability to finance part of its activities through borrowings at approved levels. The amount of such borrowings and the approved levels are monitored and reviewed regularly by the Board. During the year to 30 September 2025, the majority of the Company’s assets were non-interest bearing. Financial assets Cash deposits generally comprise overnight call or short-term money market deposits and earn interest at floating rates based onprevailing bank base rates. Financial liabilities The interest rate risk profile of the Company’s financial liabilities at 30 September is shown below: 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Fixed rate – Euro denominated 52,291 49,844 Maturity profile The maturity profile of the Company’s financial liabilities at 30 September was: 2025 Within 1 year £’000 2025 Between 1 and 5 years £’000 2025 More than 5 years £’000 2024 Within 1 year £’000 2024 Between 1 and 5 years £’000 2024 More than 5 years £’000 Repayment of loan notes – – 52,291 – – 49,844 Accumulated interest on loan notes 817 3,268 6,911 779 3,268 7,7 3 9 817 3,268 59,202 779 3,268 57,583 Interest rate risk sensitivity An increase of 1.0% in interest rates, with all other variables being held constant, would have increased the Company’s netassets for the year to 30 September 2025 by £8,000 (year to 30 September 2024 – £16,000). A decrease of 1.0% would have had an equal but opposite effect. Other price risk Changes in market prices other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk may also affect the value of the Company’s net assets. The Company’s exposure to changes in market prices relates to the fixed asset investments as disclosed in note 8. The Board manages the market price risks inherent in the investment portfolio by ensuring full and timely access to relevant information from the Investment Manager. The Board meets regularly and at each meeting reviews investment performance, theinvestment portfolio and the rationale for the current investment positioning to ensure consistency with the Company’s objectives and investment policies. The portfolio does not seek to reproduce the index, investments are selected based upon themerit of individual companies and therefore performance may well diverge from the comparative index. Other price risk sensitivity – quoted A full list of the Company’s investments is shown on pages 46 and 47. In addition, a geographical analysis of the portfolio and an analysis of the investment portfolio by broad industrial or commercial sector are contained on page 48. 98.4% (2024 – 106.6%) of the Company’s net assets are invested in quoted equities. A 20% increase in quoted equity valuations at 30 September 2025 would have increased total net assets and net return after taxation by £69,659,000 (2024 – £78,100,000). A decrease of 20% would have had an equal but opposite effect. The level of change is considered to be reasonable based on observations of current market conditions. Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 98 19 Financial instruments (continued) Other price risk sensitivity – unlisted 15.5% (2024 – 6.4%) of the Company’s net assets are invested in unlisted investments. The fair valuation of the unlisted investments is influenced by the estimates, assumptions and judgements made in the fair valuation process (see 1(b) on pages86and 87). A sensitivity analysis is provided below which recognises that the valuation methodologies employed involve subjectivity in their significant unobservable inputs and illustrates the sensitivity of the valuations to these inputs. The inputs havebeen flexed by +/-10% with the exception of the Recent Transaction Price valuation approach as it does not involve significant subjectivity. The table also provides the range of values for the key unobservable inputs. As at 30 September 2025 Significant unobservable inputs Valuation technique Fair value of investments £’000 Key unobservable inputs Other unobservable inputs † Range Weighted average range # Sensitivity % Sensitivity to changes in significant unobservable inputs Market approach using comparable traded multiples 14,329 EV/NTM revenue multiple a,b,c,d 1.53 – 2.57x 2.27x 10% If EV/LTM multiples changed by +/- 10%, the fair value would change by £797,605 and (£797,829) ‡ . Transaction implied premiums/ (discounts) g (14.3%) – (5.5%) (8.1%) 10% If the transaction implied premium/ (discount) is changed by +/- 10%, the fair value would change by £75,858 and (£76,082). Recent transaction price 40,531 N/A a,b N/A N/A 10% If the recent transaction price changed by +/- 10%, the fair value would change by +/-£523,403. 99 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 19 Financial Instruments (continued) Other price risk sensitivity – unlisted (continued) As at 30 September 2024 Significant unobservable inputs Valuation technique Fair value of investments £’000 Key unobservable inputs Other unobservable inputs † Range Weighted average range # Sensitivity % Sensitivity to changes in significant unobservable inputs Market approach using comparable traded multiples 5,873 EV/NTM revenue multiple a,b,c,d N/A 6.5x 10% If EV/LTM multiples changed by +/- 10%, the fair value would change by £621,066 and (£623,742) ‡ . Transaction implied premiums/ (discounts) g N/A (55.7%) 10% If the transaction implied premium/ (discount) is changed by +/- 10%, the fair value would change by 955,457 and (£919,070). Benchmark performance 2,695 Selection of comparable companies and relevant indices a,b,c,f (26.7)% – 5.9% (5.8%) 10% If input comparable company performance changed by +/- 10%, the fair value would change by £273,014 and (£266,614). Insolvency risk discount a,b N/A 90% 10% If the insolvency risk discount changed by +/-10%, the fair value would change by £971,539 and (£965,139). Recent transaction price * 14,907 N/A a,b N/A N/A 10% If the recent transaction price changed by +/- 10%, the fair value would change by +/-£1,490,764. † See explanation of significant unobservable inputs below (sections ‘a’ to ‘g’ as relevant). # Weighted average is calculated by reference to the fair value of holdings as at the respective year end. This therefore gives a clearer indication of the typical multiple or adjustment being applied across the portfolio. ‡ Flexing the revenue figures by the same sensitivity would result in the same change in both directions. * When marking to recent transactions, Baillie Gifford’s Valuation Team ensures that each deal has occurred on an arm’s-length basis. In doing so, the team considers factors such as the investor mix, transaction size, and the company’s operational progress. Where these and other relevant conditions are met, private valuations are updated to reflect the closing terms of the recent transactions Significant unobservable inputs The variable inputs applicable to each broad category of valuation basis will vary dependent on the particular circumstances ofeach private company valuation. An explanation of each of the key variable inputs is provided below. The assumptions made inthe production of the inputs are described in note 1(c) on page 87. a. Application of valuation basis Each investment is assessed independently, and the valuation basis applied will vary depending on the circumstances of each investment. When an investment is pre-revenue, the focus of the valuation will be on assessing the recent transaction and the achievement of key milestones since investment. Adjustments may also be made depending on the performance of comparable benchmarks and companies. For those investments where a trading multiples approach can be taken, the methodology will factor in revenue, earnings or net assets as appropriate for the investment, and where a suitable correlation can be identified with the comparable companies then a regression analysis will be performed. Discounted cash flows will also be considered where appropriate forecasts are available. Financial report Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 100 19 Financial instruments (continued) b. Probability estimation of liquidation events The probability of a liquidation event such as a company sale, insolvency event, or alternatively an initial public offering (‘IPO’), is a key variable input in the transaction-based and multiples-based valuation techniques. The probability of an IPO versus a company sale istypically estimated from the outset to be 50:50 if there has been no indication by the company of pursuing either of these routes. If the company has indicated an intention to IPO, the probability is increased accordingly to 75% and if an IPO has become a certainty the probability is increased to 100%. Likewise, in a scenario where a company is pursuing a trade sale the weightings will be adjusted accordingly in favour of a sale scenario, or in a situation where a company is underperforming expectations significantly and therefore deemed very unlikely to pursue an IPO. Should there be a risk of an insolvency event, then an appropriate discount may be applied and the ability to enforce liquidation protections will be assessed based on the individual circumstances. c. Selection of comparable companies The selection of comparable companies is assessed individually for each investment at the point of investment, and the relevance of the comparable companies is continually evaluated at each valuation. The key criteria used in selecting appropriate comparable companies are the industry sector in which they operate, the geography of the company’s operations, the respective revenue and earnings growth rates and the operating margins. Typically, between 4 and 10 comparable companies will be selected for each investment, depending on how many relevant comparable companies are identified. The resultant revenue or earnings multiples or share price movements derived will vary depending on the companies selected and the industries they operate in. d. Estimated sustainable earnings The selection of sustainable revenue or earnings will depend on whether the company is sustainably profitable or not, and where it is not then revenues will be used in the valuation. The valuation approach will typically assess companies based on the last twelve months of revenue or earnings, as they are the most recent available and therefore viewed as the most reliable. Where a company has reliably forecasted earnings previously or there is a change in circumstance at the business which will impact earnings going forward, then forward estimated revenue or earnings may be used instead. Significant unobservable inputs (continued) e. Application of illiquidity discount The application of an illiquidity discount will be applied either through the calibration of a valuation against the most recenttransaction, or by application of a specific discount. The discount applied where a calibration is not appropriate istypically 10%, reflecting the fact that the majority of the investments held are substantial companies with some secondarymarket activity. f. Selection of appropriate benchmarks The selection of appropriate benchmarks is assessed individually for each investment. The industry and geography of each company are key inputs to the benchmark selection, with either one or two key indices or benchmarks being used for comparison. g. Transaction implied premium and discount Where there is an implied company valuation available as a result of an external arm’s length transaction, the ongoing valuation will be calibrated to this by deriving a company valuation with reference to the average multiple from a set of comparable companies and comparing this to a transaction implied valuation, and could result in an implied premium or discount compared to comparable companies at the point of transaction. This discount or premium will be considered in future valuations, and may be reduced due to factors such as period of time since the transaction and company performance. Where a calibrated approach is not appropriate, a discount for illiquidity will be applied as noted in (e) above. Liquidity risk This is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities. Liquidity risk is not significant as the majority of the Company’s assets are in investments that are readily realisable. The Company’s holdings in unlisted investments, which are not considered to be readily realisable, amounted to 15.5% of net assets at 30 September 2025 (6.4% of net assets at 30 September 2024). The Company has the power to take out borrowings, which give it access to additional funding when required. The maturity profile of the Company’s financial liabilities is on page 9 7. 101 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 19 Financial instruments (continued) Credit risk This is the risk that a failure of a counterparty to a transaction to discharge its obligations under that transaction could result intheCompany suffering a loss. This risk is managed as follows: • where the Investment Manager makes an investment in a bond or other security with credit risk, that credit risk is assessed andthen compared to the prospective investment return of the security in question. The Board regularly receives information from the Managers on the credit ratings of those bonds and other securities in which the Company has invested (if any); • the Depositary is liable for the loss of financial instruments held in custody. The Depositary will ensure that any delegate segregates the assets of the Company. The Depositary has delegated the custody function to The Northern Trust Company. Bankruptcy or insolvency of the custodian may cause the Company’s rights with respect to securities held by the custodian tobedelayed. The Investment Manager monitors the Company’s risk by reviewing the custodian’s internal control reports and reporting its findings to the Board; • investment transactions are carried out with a large number of brokers whose creditworthiness is reviewed by the Investment Manager. Transactions are ordinarily undertaken on a delivery versus payment basis whereby the Company’s custodian ensures that the counterparty to any transaction entered into by the Company has delivered on its obligations before any transfer ofcash or securities away from the Company is completed; • the creditworthiness of the counterparty to transactions involving derivatives, structured notes and other arrangements, wherein the creditworthiness of the entity acting as broker or counterparty to the transaction is likely to be of sustained interest, is subject to rigorous assessment by the Investment Manager; and • cash is only held at banks that are regularly reviewed by the Investment Manager. Credit risk exposure The exposure to credit risk at 30 September was: 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Cash at bank 2,807 1,856 Debtors 3,545 1,331 6,352 3,187 None of the Company’s financial assets are past due or impaired. Fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities The Directors are of the opinion that there is no difference between the amounts at which the financial assets and liabilities oftheCompany are carried in the Balance Sheet and their fair values, with the exception of long term borrowings. The fair values of the Company’s borrowings are shown below. The fair values of the loan notes are calculated by reference to corporate bonds ofcomparable maturity and yield. Unsecured loan notes: 2025 Book value £’000 2025 Fair value £’000 2024 Book value £’000 2024 Fair value £’000 €30m 1.55% 24 June 2036 26,162 20,730 24,938 19,465 €30m 1.57% 8 December 2040 26,129 17,715 24,906 16,960 52,291 38,445 49,844 36,425 Capital management The objective of the Company is to maximise the total return to its equity shareholders through an appropriate capital structure. Its borrowings are set out in note 12 on page 93. The Company does not have any externally imposed capital requirements other than the covenants on its loan notes which are detailed in note 12. The capital of the Company is the ordinary share capital asdetailed in note 13. It is managed in accordance with its investment policy in pursuit of its investment objective, both of which are detailed on pages 28 and 29, and shares may be repurchased or issued as explained on page 93. Shareholder information 103 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Notice of Annual General Meeting The Annual General Meeting of Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc will be held at OneMoorgate Place, City of London, EC2R 6EA on Wednesday 4February 2026 at 2pm. You will find directions to the venue by scanning the QRcodeabove. To accurately reflect the views of shareholders of the Company, the Board intends to hold the AGM voting on a poll. The Board encourages all shareholders to submit proxy voting forms as soon as possible and, in any event, by no later than 2pm on 2 February 2026. Should shareholders have questions for the Boardorthe Managers or any queries as to how tovote orhow to attend the meeting they are welcome asalways to submit them by email to enquiries@bailliegifford.com or call 0800 917 2113. Baillie Gifford may record your call. For details of how to vote your shares if held via a platform please refer to theaic.co.uk/how-to-vote- your-shares. Moorgate Moorgate Copthall Ave Throgmorton Ave Finsbury Moorgate Circus London Wall London Wall Basinghall Ave One Moorgate Place City of London London EC2R 6EA Shareholder information Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 104 Notice is hereby given that an Annual General Meeting of Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc will be held at OneMoorgate Place, City of London, EC2R 6EA, on Wednesday 4 February 2026, at2pm for the following purposes. To consider and, if thought fit, to pass the following Resolutions as Ordinary Resolutions. 01. To receive and adopt the Financial Statements of the Company for the year to 30 September 2025 with the Reports of the Directors and of the Independent Auditor thereon. 02. To approve the Directors’ Remuneration Policy. 03. To approve the Directors’ Annual Report on Remuneration for the year to 30 September 2025. 04 To declare a final dividend of 0.72p per ordinary share. 05. To re-elect David Barron as a Director oftheCompany. 06. To re-elect Davina Curling as a Director oftheCompany. 07. To re-elect Andrew Watkins as a Director oftheCompany. 08. To re-elect Emma Davies as a Director oftheCompany. 09. To re-appoint BDO LLP as Independent Auditor of the Company to hold office from the conclusion of this meeting until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting at which the Financial Statements are laid before the Company. 10. To authorise the Directors to determine the remuneration of the Independent Auditor oftheCompany. 11. That, in substitution for any existing authority, but without prejudice to the exercise of any such authority prior to the date hereof, the Directors of the Company be and they are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised in accordance with section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Act’) to exercise all the powers of the Company to allot shares in the Company and to grant rights to subscribe for or to convert any security into shares in the Company (‘Securities’) provided that such authority shall be limited to the allotment of shares and the grant of rights in respect of shares with an aggregate nominal value of up to £2,560,023, such authority to expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the passing of this resolution or on the expiry of 15 months from the passing of this resolution, whichever is the earlier, unless previously revoked, varied or extended by the Company in a general meeting, save that the Company may at any time prior to the expiry of this authority make an offer or enter into an agreement which would or might require Securities to be allotted or granted after the expiry of such authority and the Directors shall be entitled to allot or grant Securities in pursuance of such an offer or agreement as if such authority had not expired. To consider and, if thought fit, to pass Resolutions 12, 13 and 14 as Special Resolutions. 12. That, subject to the passing of Resolution 11 above, and in substitution for any existing power but without prejudice to the exercise of any such power prior to the date hereof, the Directors of the Company be and they are hereby generally empowered, pursuant to sections 570 and 573 of the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Act’), to allot equity securities (within the meaning of section 560(1) of the Act), for cash pursuant to the authority given by Resolution 11 above, and to sell treasury shares for cash, as if section 561(1) of the Act did not apply to any such allotment orsale, provided that this power: a. expires at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the passing of this Resolution or on the expiry of 15 months from the passing of this Resolution, whichever is the earlier, save that the Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or agreement which would or might require equity securities to be allotted or treasury shares to be sold after such expiry and the Directors may allot equity securities or sell treasury shares in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if the power conferred hereby had not expired; and 105 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc b. shall be limited to the allotment of equity securities or the sale of treasury shares up to an aggregate nominal value of £768,007, being approximately 10% of the nominal value of the issued share capital of the Company, as at 4 December 2025. 13. That, in substitution for any existing authority but without prejudice to the exercise of any such authority prior to the date hereof, the Company be and is hereby generally and unconditionally authorised, pursuant to and in accordance with section 701 of the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Act’) to make market purchases (within the meaning of section 693(4) of the Act) of fully paid ordinary shares of 2.5 pence each in the capital of the Company (‘ordinary shares’) (either for retention as treasury shares for future reissue, resale, transfer or cancellation), provided that: a. the maximum aggregate number of ordinary shares hereby authorised to be purchased is 46,049,709, or, if less, the number representing approximately 14.99% of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as at the date of the passing of this Resolution; b. the minimum price (excluding expenses) which may be paid for each ordinary share shall be the nominal value of that share; c. the maximum price (excluding expenses) which may be paid for each ordinary share shall not be more than the higher of: i. 5 per cent above the average closing price on the London Stock Exchange of an ordinary share over the five business days immediately preceding the date of purchase; and ii. the higher of the last independent trade and the highest current independent bid on the London Stock Exchange; and d. unless previously varied, revoked or renewed by the Company in a general meeting, the authority hereby conferred shall expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in respect of the year ending 30 September 2026, save that the Company may, prior to such expiry, enter into a contract to purchase ordinary shares under such authority which will or might be completed or executed wholly or partly after the expiration of such authority and may make a purchase of ordinary shares pursuant to any such contract. 14. That, the Company be and is hereby generally and unconditionally authorised to hold general meetings (other than Annual General Meetings) on 14 clear days’ notice,such authority to expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company. By order of the Board Baillie Gifford & Co Limited Company Secretaries 8 December 2025 Shareholder information Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 106 Notes 01. As a member you are entitled to appoint a proxy or proxies to exercise all or any of your rights to attend, speak and vote at the AGM. A proxy need not be a member of the Company but must attend the AGM to represent you. You may appoint more than one proxy provided each proxy is appointed to exercise rights attached to different shares. You can only appoint a proxy using the procedure set out in these notes and the notes to the proxy form. You may not use any electronic address provided either in this notice or any related documents (including the proxy form) to communicate with the Company for any purpose other than those expressly stated. 02. To be valid any proxy form or other instrument appointing a proxy, together with any power of attorney or other authority under which it is signed or a certified copy thereof, must be received by post or (during normal business hours only) by hand at the Registrars of the Company at Computershare Investor Services PLC, The Pavilions, Bridgwater Road, Bristol, BS99 6ZY or online at eproxyappointment.com nolater than two days (excluding non-working days) before the time of the meeting or any adjourned meeting. 03. CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy orproxies through the CREST electronic proxy appointment service may do so by using the procedures described in the CREST Manual and/or by logging on to the website euroclear. com/CREST. CREST personal members or other CREST sponsored members, and those CREST members who have appointed a voting service provider(s), should refer to their CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s), who will be able to take the appropriateaction on their behalf. 04. In order for a proxy appointment or instruction made using the CREST service to be valid, the appropriate CREST message (a ‘CREST Proxy Instruction’) must be properly authenticated in accordance with Euroclear UK & International Limited’s specifications, and must contain the information required for such instruction, as described in the CREST Manual. The message, regardless of whether it constitutes the appointment of a proxy or is an amendment to the instruction given to a previously appointed proxy must, in order to be valid, be transmitted so as to be received by the Company’s registrar (ID 3RA50) no later than two days (excluding non-working days) before the time of the meeting or any adjournment. For this purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to be the time (as determined by the timestamp applied to the message by the CREST Application Host) from which the Company’s registrar is able to retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST in the manner prescribed by CREST. After this time any change of instructions to proxies appointed through CREST should be communicated to the appointee through other means. 05. CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors, or voting service providers should note that Euroclear UK & International Limited does not make available special procedures in CREST for any particular message. Normal system timings and limitations will, therefore, apply in relation to the input of CREST Proxy Instructions. It is the responsibility of the CREST member concerned to take (or, if the CREST member is a CREST personal member, or sponsored member, or has appointed a voting service provider(s), to procure that his/ her CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s) take(s)) such action as shall be necessary to ensure that a message is transmitted by means of the CREST system by any particular time. Inthis connection, CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting system providers are referred, in particular, tothose sections of the CREST Manual concerning practical limitations of the CREST system and timings. 06. The Company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy Instruction in the circumstances set out in Regulation 35(5)(a) of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001. 07. The return of a completed proxy form or other instrument of proxy will not prevent youattending the AGM and voting in person ifyou wish. 08. Pursuant to Regulation 41 of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001 and section 311 of the Companies Act 2006 the Company specifies that to be entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting (and for the purpose of the determination by the Company of the votes they may cast), shareholders must be registered in the Register of Members of the Company no later than two days (excluding non-working days) prior to the commencement of the AGM or any adjourned meeting. Changes to the Register of Members after the relevant deadline shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend and vote at the meeting. 107 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc 09. Any person to whom this notice is sent who is a person nominated under section 146 of the Companies Act 2006 to enjoy information rights (a ‘Nominated Person’) may, under an agreement between him/her and the shareholder by whom he/she was nominated, have a right to be appointed (or to have someone else appointed) as a proxy for the Annual General Meeting. If a Nominated Person has no such proxy appointment right or does not wish to exercise it,he/she may, under any such agreement, have a right to give instructions to the shareholder as to the exercise of voting rights. 10. The statement of the rights of shareholders in relation to the appointment of proxies in Notes 1 and 2 above does not apply to Nominated Persons. The rights described in those Notes can only be exercised by shareholders of the Company. 11. Under section 338 of the Companies Act 2006, members meeting the qualification criteria set out in note 14 below may, subject to certain conditions, require the Company to circulate to members notice of a resolution which may properly be moved and is intended to be moved at that meeting. The conditions are that: a. the resolution must not, if passed, be ineffective (whether by reason of inconsistency with any enactment or the Company’s constitution or otherwise); b. the resolution must not be defamatory of any person, frivolous or vexatious; and c. the request: i. may be in hard copy form or in electronic form; ii. must identify the resolution of which notice is to be given by either setting out the resolution in full or, if supporting a resolution sent by another member, clearly identifying the resolution which is being supported; iii. must be authenticated by the person or persons making it; and iv. must be received by the Company not later than 24 December 2025. 12. Under section 338A of the Companies Act 2006, members meeting the qualification criteria set out at note 14 below may require the Company to include in the business to be dealt with at the Annual General Meeting a matter (other than a proposed resolution) which may properly be included in the business (amatter ofbusiness). The request must have been received by the Company no later than 24December 2025. The conditions are that the matter of business must not be defamatory of any person, frivolous or vexatious. The request must identify the matter of business by either setting it out in full or, if supporting a statement sent by another member, clearly identify the matter of business which is being supported. The request must be accompanied by a statement setting out the grounds for the request. Members seeking to do this should write to the Company providing their full name and address. 13. Under section 527 of the Companies Act 2006, members meeting the qualification criteria set out in note 14 below may require the Company to publish, on its website, (without payment) a statement (which is also passed to the Auditor) setting out any matter relating to the audit of the Company’s Financial Statements, including the Auditor’s Report and the conduct of the audit. Such requests must be made in writing and must state your full name and address. 14. In order to be able to exercise the members’ rights in notes 11 to 13, the relevant request must be made by: a. members representing at least 5% of the total voting rights of all the members who have a right to vote on the resolution to which the requests relate; or b. at least 100 members who have a right to vote on the resolution to which the requests relate and hold shares in the Company on which there has been paid up an average sum, per member, of at least £100. Such requests should be sent to the Company at Calton Square, 1 Greenside Row, Edinburgh, EH1 3AN. Electronic requests permitted under section 338 (see note 11) should be sent to enquiries@bailliegifford.com. Shareholder information Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 108 15. Information regarding the Annual General Meeting, including information required by section 311A of the Companies Act 2006, is available from the Company’s page of the Managers’ website at bgeuropeangrowth.com. 16. As at 4December 2025 (being the last practicable day prior to the publication of this notice) the Company’s issued share capital consisted of 307,202,867 ordinary shares, carrying one vote each. Therefore, the total voting rights in the Company as at 4December 2025 were 307,202,867 votes. Voting on the resolutions will be conducted by way of a poll. This will ensure an extact and definitive result. 17. Any person holding 3% or more of the total voting rights of the Company who appoints a person other than the Chairman of the meeting as his/her proxy will need to ensure that both he/she and his/her proxy comply with their respective disclosure obligations under the UKDisclosure and Transparency Rules. 18. No Director has a contract of service with theCompany. 109 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust is an investment trust. Investment trusts offer investors the following: • participation in a diversified portfolio of shares; • constant supervision by experienced professional managers; and • the Company is free from capital gains tax on capital profits realised within its portfolio, although investors are still liable for capital gains tax on profits when selling their investment. How to invest The Company’s shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange. They can be bought by placing an order with a stockbroker, or by asking a professional adviser to do so. If you are interested in investing directly in Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust, youcan do so online. There are a number of companies offering real time online dealing services. Find out more by visiting the investment trust pages at bailliegifford.com. Sources of further information on the Company The price of the Company’s shares is quoted daily in the Financial Times and can also be found on the Company’s page of the Managers’ website at bgeuropeangrowth.com, Trustnet at trustnet.com and on other financial websites. Company factsheets are also available on the Baillie Gifford website and are updated monthly. These are available from BaillieGifford on request. Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust Identifiers ISIN GB00BMC7T380 Sedol BMC7T38 Ticker BGEU Legal Entity Identifier 213800QNN9EHZ4SC1R12 The ordinary shares of the Company are listed on the London Stock Exchange. Key dates Ordinary shareholders normally receive one dividend in respect of each financial year paid in February. The Annual Report and Financial Statements are normally issued in November/December and the AGM is normally held in January/February. Share register enquiries Computershare Investor Services PLC maintains theshare register on behalf of the Company. Inthe event of queries regarding shares registered in yourown name, please contact the Registrars on 0370 889 4086. This helpline also offers an automated self-service functionality (available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week) which allows you to: • hear the latest share price; • confirm your current share holding balance; and • order Change of Address, Dividend Bank Mandate and Stock Transfer forms. Further shareholder information Shareholder information Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 110 You can also check your holding on the Registrars’ website at investorcentre.co.uk. They also offer a free, secure share management website service which allows you to: • view your share portfolio and see the latest market price of your shares; • calculate the total market price of each shareholding; • view price histories and trading graphs; • change address details; and • use online dealing services. To take advantage of this service, please log in at investorcentre.co.uk and enter your Shareholder Reference Number and Company Code (this information can be found on the last dividend voucher or your share certificate). Electronic proxy voting If you hold stock in your own name you can choose to vote by returning proxies electronically at eproxyappointment.com. If you have any questions about this service please contact Computershare on 0370 889 4086. Dividend Reinvestment Plan Computershare operate a Dividend Reinvestment Plan which can be used to buy additional shares instead of receiving your dividend via cheque or into your bank account. For further information log on to investorcentre.co.uk and follow the instructions or telephone 0370 889 4086. CREST proxy voting If you are a user of the CREST system (including aCREST Personal Member), you may appoint one or more proxies or give an instruction to a proxy byhaving an appropriate CREST message transmitted. For further information please refer tothe CREST Manual. 111 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Communicating with shareholders Trust magazine Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust web page at bgeuropeangrowth.com Trust magazine Trust is the Baillie Gifford investment trust magazine which is published twice a year. It provides an insightto our investment approach by including interviews with our fund managers, as well as containing investment trust news, investment features and articles about the trusts managed by Baillie Gifford, including Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust. Trust plays an important role in helping to explain our products so that readers can really understand them. You can subscribe to Trust magazine or view a digitalcopy at bailliegifford.com/trust Suggestions and Questions Any suggestions on how communications with shareholders can be improved are welcomed, so please contact the Baillie Gifford Client Relations Team and give them your suggestions. They will also be very happy to answer questions that you may have about Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust. Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust ontheweb Up-to-date information about Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust is available on the Company’s page of the Managers’ website at bgeuropeangrowth.com. You will find full details of the Company, including recent portfolio information and performance figures. Electronic communications from theCompany Shareholders now have the opportunity to be notified by email when the Company’s Annual Reports, Interim Reports and other formal communications are available on the website, instead of receiving printed copies by post. This has environmental benefits in the reduction of paper, printing, energy and water usage, as well as reducing costs to theCompany. If you have not already elected to receive electronic communications from the Company and wish to do so, please contact the Registrar using the details shown on page 119. Please have your Shareholder Reference Number to hand. Shareholder information Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 112 Pushing rocks uphill: the case for European equities in 2025 | Baillie Gifford by Thomas Hodges Thomas Hodges Highlights European Revival: Infrastructure Investments Propel Nexans, Kingspan, ASML, and ASM Amid Market Shifts. Europe’s turning point by Chris Davies Chris Davies on Europe’s Economic Shift: Defence Spending and Market Reforms Open Growth Opportunities. The Next Chapter Baillie Gifford Trusts Look Ahead: Managers Gather in Edinburgh to Emphasize Private Investment and AI Progress Amid Optimism. Client relations team contact details You can contact the Baillie Gifford Client Relations Team by telephone, email or post: Telephone: 0800 917 2113 Your call may be recorded for training or monitoring purposes. Email: enquiries@bailliegifford.com Website: bailliegifford.com Address: Baillie Gifford Client Relations Team Calton Square 1 Greenside Row Edinburgh EH1 3AN Please note that Baillie Gifford is not permitted to give financial advice. If you would like advice, please ask an authorised intermediary. 113 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc UK Alternative Investment Fund Managers (‘AIFM’) Regulations In accordance with the AIFM Regulations, information in relation to the Company’s leverage and the remuneration of the Company’s AIFM, BaillieGifford & Co Limited, is required to be madeavailable to investors. AIFM Remuneration In accordance with the Regulations, the AIFM remuneration policy is available at bailliegifford. com or on request (see contact details on page 119). Thenumerical remuneration disclosures in respect of the AIFM’s reporting period are available at bailliegifford.com. Leverage The Company’s maximum and actual leverage (seeGlossary of terms and alternative performance measures on page 120) levels at 30 September 2025 are shown below: Gross method Commitment method Maximum limit 2.50:1 2.00:1 Actual 1.15:1 1.15:1 Automatic exchange of information In order to fulfil its obligations under UK tax legislation relating to the automatic exchange of information, the Company is required to collect and report certain information about certain shareholders. The legislation requires investment trust companies to provide personal information to HMRC on certain investors who purchase shares in investment trusts. As an affected company, Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust will have to provide information annually to the local tax authority on the tax residencies of a number of non-UK based certificated shareholders and corporate entities. Shareholders, excluding those whose shares are held in CREST, who come on to the share register will be sent a certification form for the purposes of collecting this information. For further information, please see HMRC’s QuickGuide: Automatic Exchange of Information – information for account holders gov.uk/government/publications/exchange-of- information-account-holders. Shareholder information Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 114 Third party data provider disclaimer No third party data provider (‘Provider’) makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data contained herewith nor as to the results to be obtained by recipients of the data. No Provider shall in any way be liable to any recipient of the data for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions in the index data included in this document, regardless of cause, or for any damages (whether direct or indirect) resulting therefrom. No Provider has any obligation to update, modify or amend the data or to otherwise notify a recipient thereof in the event that any matter stated herein changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate. Without limiting the foregoing, no Provider shall have any liability whatsoever to you, whether in contract (including under an indemnity), in tort (including negligence), under a warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or damage suffered by you as a result of or in connection with any opinions, recommendations, forecasts, judgements, or any other conclusions, or any course of action determined, by you or any third party, whether or not based on the content, information or materials contained herein. FTSE Index data Source: London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the ‘LSE Group’). ©LSE Group 2025. FTSE Russell is a trading name of certain of the LSE Group companies. ‘FTSE®’ ‘Russell®’, ‘FTSE Russell®, are trade marks of the relevant LSE Group companies and are used by anyother LSE Group company under license. Allrights in the FTSE Russell indices or data vest in the relevant LSE Group company which owns the index or the data. Neither LSE Group nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indices or data and no party may rely on any indices or data contained in this communication. No further distribution of data from the LSE Group is permitted without the relevant LSEGroup company’s express written consent. TheLSE Group does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication. 115 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc The EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (‘SFDR’) does not have a direct impact in the UK due to Brexit, however, it applies to third-country products marketed in the EU. As Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust is marketed in the EU by the AIFM, Baillie Gifford & Co Limited, via the National Private Placement Regime (‘NPPR’) the following disclosures have been provided to comply with the high-level requirements of SFDR. The AIFM has adopted Baillie Gifford & Co’s ESG Principles and Guidelines as its policy on integration of sustainability risks in investment decisions. Baillie Gifford & Co believes that a company cannot be financially sustainable in the long run if its approach to business is fundamentally out of line with changing societal expectations. It defines ‘sustainability’ as a deliberately broad concept which encapsulates a company’s purpose, values, business model, culture, and operating practices. Baillie Gifford & Co’s approach to investment is based on identifying and holding high quality growth businesses that enjoy sustainable competitive advantages in their marketplace. To do this it looks beyond current financial performance, undertaking proprietary research to build up an in-depth knowledge of an individual company and a view on its long-term prospects. This includes the consideration of sustainability factors (environmental, social and/or governance matters) which it believes will positively or negatively influence the financial returns of an investment. Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (‘SFDR’) (unaudited) The likely impact on the return of the portfolio from a potential or actual material decline in the value of investment due to the occurrence of an environmental, social or governance event or condition will vary and will depend on several factors including but not limited to the type, extent, complexity and duration of an event or condition, prevailing market conditions and existence of any mitigating factors. Whilst consideration is given to sustainability matters, there are no restrictions on the investment universe of the Company, unless otherwise stated within in its Investment Objective & Policy. Baillie Gifford & Co can invest in any companies it believes could create beneficial long-term returns for investors. However, this might result in investments being made in companies that ultimately cause a negative outcome for the environment or society. More detail on the Manager’sapproach to sustainability can be found in the ESG Principles and Guidelines document, available publicly on the Baillie Gifford website bailliegifford.com and by scanning the QR code below. The underlying investments do not take into account the EU criteria for environmentally sustainable economic activities established under the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Shareholder information Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 116 Glossary of terms and alternative performance measures (‘APM’) An alternative performance measure (‘APM’) is a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows, other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable financial reporting framework. The APMs noted below are commonly used measures within the investment trust industry and serve to improve comparability between investment trusts. Total assets This is the Company’s definition of Adjusted Total Assets, being the total value of all assets less current liabilities, before deduction of all borrowings. Shareholders’ funds Shareholders’ funds is the value of all assets held less all liabilities, with borrowings deducted at book value. Net asset value Net Asset Value is the value of total assets less liabilities with borrowings deducted at either book value or fair value as described below. The net asset value per share (NAV) is calculated by dividing this amount by the number of ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares). Net asset value (borrowings at fair value) (APM) Borrowings are valued at an estimate of market worth. The fair value of the Company’s loan notes is set out in note 19 on page 101. A reconciliation from shareholders’ funds (borrowings at book value) to net asset value after deducting borrowings at fair value is provided below. 2025 £’000 2025 per share 2024 £’000 2024 per share Shareholders’ funds (borrowings at book value) 353,916 109.0p 366,431 104.2p Add: book value of borrowings 52,291 16.1p 49,844 14.2p Less: fair value of borrowings (38,445) (11.8p) (36,425) (10.4p) Net asset value (borrowings at fair value) 367,762 113.3p 379,850 108.0p The per share figures above are based on 324,722,867 (2024 – 351,783,279) ordinary shares of 2.5p, being the number of ordinary shares in issue at the year end. Net liquid assets Net liquid assets comprise current assets less current liabilities, excluding borrowings. 117 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Discount/premium (APM) As stockmarkets and share prices vary, an investment trust’s share price is rarely the same as its NAV. Whenthe share price is lower than the NAV it is said to be trading at a discount. The size of the discount is calculated by subtracting the NAV from the share price and is usually expressed as a percentage of the NAV. If the share price is higher than the NAV, it is said to be trading at a premium. 2025 NAV (book) 2025 NAV (fair) 2024 NAV (book) 2024 NAV (fair) Closing NAV 109.0p 113.3p 104.2p 108.0p Closing share price 103.5p 103.5p 91.0p 91.0p Discount 5.0% 8.6% 12.7% 15.7% Total return (APM) The total return is the return to shareholders after reinvesting the net dividend on the date that the share price goes ex-dividend. 2025 NAV (fair) 2025 NAV (book) 2025 Share price 2024 NAV (fair) 2024 NAV (book) 2024 Share price Closing NAV/share price (a) 113.3p 109.0p 103.5p 108.0p 104.2p 91.0p Dividend adjustment factor* (b) 1.0058 1.0058 1.0068 1.0039 1.0040 1.0045 Adjusted closing NAV/share price (c) = (a) x (b) 113.9p 109.6p 104.2p 108.4p 104.6p 91.4p Opening NAV/share price (d) 108.0p 104.2p 91.0p 96.7p 91.4p 83.6p Total return (c) ÷ (d) -1 5.5% 5.2% 14.5% 12.1% 14.5% 9.3% * The dividend adjustment factor is calculated on the assumption that the final dividend of 0.6p (2024 – dividends of 0.4p) paid by the Company during the year were reinvested into shares of the Company at the cum income NAV/share price, as appropriate, at the ex-dividend date. The NAV(fair) total return for the period since Baillie Gifford began managing the portfolio in November 2019 can be calculated using the methodology shown in the table above and an opening NAV of 93.7p, a dividend adjustment factor of 1.0615 and a closing NAV of 108.0p. Shareholder information Annual Report and Financial Statements 2025 118 Leverage (APM) For the purposes of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Regulations, leverage is any method which increases the Company’s exposure, including the borrowing of cash and the use of derivatives. It is expressed as a ratio between the Company’s exposure and its net asset value and can be calculated on a gross and a commitment method. Under the gross method, exposure represents the sum of the Company’s positions after the deduction of sterling cash balances, without taking into account any hedging and netting arrangements. Under the commitment method, exposure is calculated without the deduction of sterling cash balances and after certain hedging and netting positions are offset against each other. Active share (APM) Active share, a measure of how actively a portfolio is managed, is the percentage of the portfolio that differs from its comparative index. It is calculated by deducting from 100 the percentage of the portfolio that overlaps with the comparative index. An active share of 100 indicates no overlap with the index and an active share of zero indicates a portfolio that tracks the index. Ongoing charges (APM) The total expenses (excluding borrowing costs) incurred by the Company as a percentage of the average netasset value with borrowings at fair value. The ongoing charges have been calculated on the basis prescribed by the Association of Investment Companies. A reconciliation from the expenses detailed in the Income Statement on page 82 is provided below. 2025 2024 Investment management fee £1,776,000 £1,847,000 Other administrative expenses £626,000 £630,000 Total expenses (a) £2,402,000 £2,477,000 Average net asset value (with borrowings deducted at fair value) (b) £366,441,000 £383,617,000 Ongoing charges ((a) ÷ (b) expressed as a percentage) 0.66% 0.65% Gearing (APM) At its simplest, gearing is borrowing. Just like any other public company, an investment trust can borrow money to invest in additional investments for its portfolio. The effect of the borrowing on shareholders’ funds is called ‘gearing’. If the Company’s assets grow, shareholders’ funds grow proportionately more because the debt remains the same. But if the value of the Company’s assets falls, the situation is reversed. Gearing can therefore enhance performance in rising markets but can adversely impact performance in falling markets. Net Gearing is the Company’s borrowings adjusted for cash at hand expressed as a percentage of shareholders’ funds. Gross gearing is the Company’s borrowings expressed as a percentage of shareholders’ funds. 2025 £’000 2024 £’000 Borrowings (at book value) (a) 52,291 49,844 Less: cash at hand (2,807) (1,856) Adjusted borrowings (b) 49,484 47,988 Shareholders' funds (c) 353,916 366,431 Gross gearing ((a) ÷ (c) expressed as a percentage) 14.8% 13.6% Net gearing ((b) ÷ (c) expressed as a percentage) 14.0% 13.1% 119 Baillie Gifford European Growth Trust plc Directors Chairman: D Barron D Curling E Davies A Watkins Alternative Investment Fund Managers and Secretaries Baillie Gifford & Co Limited Calton Square 1 Greenside Row Edinburgh EH1 3AN T: +44 (0)131 275 2000 bailliegifford.com Registrar Computershare Investor Services PLC The Pavilions Bridgwater Road Bristol BS99 6ZZ T: +44 (0)370 889 4086 Depositary Northern Trust Investor Services Limited 50 Bank Street Canary Wharf London E14 5NT Company Broker Peel Hunt LLP 7th Floor 100 Liverpool Street London EC2M 2AT Independent Auditor BDO LLP 55 Baker Street London W1U 7EU Further information Client Relations Team Baillie Gifford & Co Calton Square 1 Greenside Row Edinburgh EH1 3AN T: +44 (0)800 917 2113 enquiries@bailliegifford.com Company details bgeuropeangrowth.com Company Registration No. 1055384 ISIN: GB00BMC7T380 Sedol: BMC7T38 Ticker: BGEU Legal Entity Identifier: 213800QNN9EHZ4SC1R12 Company information Registered office Baillie Gifford & Co 3 St Helen’s Place London EC3A 6AB Calton Square, 1 Greenside Row, Edinburgh EH1 3AN Telephone +44 (0)131 275 2000 bgeuropeangrowth.com