AI assistant
AUSTAL LIMITED — Annual Report 2012
Sep 2, 2012
64429_rns_2012-09-02_80fa41a2-8b38-4a03-a12a-573480e44b8f.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
2012 – Full Year Results
September 2012
==> picture [759 x 149] intentionally omitted <==
Contents
==> picture [74 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
-
Financial Year Highlights
-
Balance Sheet Summary
-
USA segment
-
Henderson Shipyard Operation segment
-
Philippines Shipyard Operation segment
-
Service & Systems segment
-
Capital expenditure
-
US Defense outlook
-
Short term outlook for U.S. Navy Support work
-
Summary
2
Financial Year 2012 Results
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
| A$MM | FY12 | FY11 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 653.0 | 503.8 | 29.6% |
| EBIT | 16.6 | 22.1 | (24.9%) |
| Net profit after tax | 11.0 | 21.9 | (49.7%) |
| EPS | 6.01 cents | 11.9 cents | (49.5%) |
-
Revenue grew by $149M, driven by the growth in throughput in the US. Headcount in the US grew by ≈ 500 FTEs
-
This growth was offset by well publicised first in class issues on the first JHSV and low activity levels in the Henderson Shipyard Operation resulting in a drop in EBIT to $16.6M and a drop in NPAT to $11M
-
Manufacturing footprint in the US doubled to meet the schedule requirements of both vessel programs
-
Substantial operational changes made in the US operation contributing to a significant improvement in second half results - second half revenue up by 49% and EBIT up by 136%
-
Established Strategic Business Units to more closely align the cost base with the revenue base and to enhance transparency in operational performance.
-
Opened commercial vessel manufacturing facility in the Philippines to enhance competitiveness
-
Strategic new contract awards:
-
LCS 10 and 12 – US$691M
-
JHSV 8 and 9 – US$321.7M
-
Cape Class Patrol Boats - AUD$330M
-
Backlog sits at $2.6B – 4 years of future work
3
Balance Sheet Summary
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
| A$MM | FY12 | FY11 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | 826.0 | 674.6 | 22.4% |
| Cash | 51.8 | 42.3 | 22.4% |
| Restricted Cash | 52.9 | 128.8 | (58.9%) |
| Receivables | 96.2 | 22.0 | 337.3% |
| Inventories | 193.5 | 177.9 | 8.7% |
| Property, plant and equipment | 370.4 | 208.3 | 77.8% |
| Total Liabilities | 548.9 | 400.4 | 37.1% |
| Trade Creditors | 128.6 | 52.8 | 143.5% |
| Go Zone Bonds | 219.4 | 209.7 | 4.6% |
| Other interest bearing | 46.0 | 16.8 | 173.8% |
| Government Grants | 52.3 | 45.5 | 14.9% |
| Net Assets | 277.0 | 274.2 | 1.0% |
-
Strong growth in asset base reflecting increasing scale of the US business
-
PP&E growth reflects the investment in US facilities and the Philippines expansion. Land and buildings revalued by $42M reflecting substantial unrecognised growth in the value of the underlying asset base
-
GZB remains the principal source of long term debt funding for the US operation
-
US Government grant funding continues to be an important source of capital investment funding
4
USA segment
==> picture [74 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
| A$MM | FY12 | FY11 | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 570.3 | 343.9 | 65.8% |
| EBIT* | 20.8 | 30.1 | (30.9%) |
| EBIT %* | 3.6% | 8.7% | (58.6%) |
| PBT* | 13.5 | 25.9 | (47.9%) |
- Adjusted for training grant reimbursement
Highlights
-
Substantial YOY revenue growth reflecting increasing size and scale of the US operations
-
Earnings impacted by “first in class” issues. Lessons learned are being applied and indications are positive:
-
H2 v H1, revenue up 49%, EBIT up 136%
-
Labour hours per vessel reducing in line with expectations
-
Capex works of $100M completed on time and to budget providing the foundations for improving levels of efficiency
==> picture [262 x 148] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [265 x 141] intentionally omitted <==
5
Henderson Shipyard Operation segment
==> picture [74 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
| A$MM | FY12 | FY11 | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 49.0 | 133.9 | (63.4%) |
| EBIT | (13.6) | (10.1) | (34.6%) |
| EBIT % | n/a | n/a | |
| PBT | (9.2) | (8.6) | (7.0%) |
Highlights
-
Macro environment remains extremely challenging
-
Stratgically repositioned as a defence focused facility and commercial activity relocated to the Philippines
==> picture [250 x 108] intentionally omitted <==
-
Workforce and overheads right sized to deliver current order book
-
Results reflect the completion of 5 commercial vessels at low margins and the commencement of the first Cape Class vessel and associated design work
-
Rationalised manufacturing footprint and realised surplus assets in Group earnings
==> picture [250 x 147] intentionally omitted <==
6
Philippines Shipyard Operation segment
==> picture [74 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
| A$MM | FY12 | FY11 | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.9 | - | - |
| EBIT | (0.8) | - | - |
| EBIT % | n/a | - | - |
| PBT | (0.8) | - | - |
Highlights
-
Established to allow Austal to be competitive in global commercial vessel market
-
Commenced operations in February 2012
-
Full order book through Q3 2013, with prospects of further awards
-
Current labour force of 200, less than 10% expatriates
-
Additional 100 employees required over the next 6 months to complete contracted projects
==> picture [245 x 158] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [245 x 154] intentionally omitted <==
7
Service & Systems segment
==> picture [74 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
| A$MM | FY12 | FY11 | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 19.4 | 16.3 | 19% |
| EBIT | 1.6 | 0.9 | 77.8% |
| EBIT % | 8.2% | 5.5% | 49% |
| PBT | 1.6 | 1.8 | (0.1%) |
Results exclude WestPac Express charter
Highlights
-
Growth in revenue and improvement in bottom line performance reflects enhanced focus on quality of business. Service business generated a standalone EBIT of $3.35M at a margin of 18.6%
-
Secured initial 5 year maintenance contract for the Cape Class Patrol Boat program of $50M. Two options for two further terms of 5 years each are included in the contract
Support
==> picture [93 x 107] intentionally omitted <==
Systems
Maintenance
- Strategic focus on the development of the Orion command and control system will provide a further source of future growth with the system to be deployed on the first Cape Class Patrol Boat
Command and Control
==> picture [218 x 82] intentionally omitted <==
8
Capital Expenditure
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
| A$MM | 2012 actual | Forecast 2013 | Forecast 2013 | Forecast 2013 | Forecast 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | HSO | PSO | Service & Systems |
|||
| Production plant and equipment |
24.6 | 16.7 | - | 0.4 | - | |
| Buildings/Facilities | 92.2 | 11.0 | - | 6.3 | - | |
| IT | 1.1 | 1.1 | - | 0.6 | 0.2 | |
| Other | - | - | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
| Total | 117.9 | 28.8 | 0.3 | 7.4 | 0.3 |
Key projects for 2013:
-
PSO
-
Land reclamation to facilitate eventual expansion of manufacturing footprint
-
Continued expansion of production tooling to deliver contracted projects
-
USA
-
Stage 1 of Outfit yard
-
Completion of office complex , U.S. Navy building
-
Production tooling to complete fitout of new production facilities
9
US Defence Outlook – US Strategic Assessment
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [779 x 380] intentionally omitted <==
“At the Geo-Strategic level, it’s all about the littorals” General James F. Amos, Commandant of the Marine Corps, April 2012
10
US Defence Outlook – US Strategic pivot to Asia- Pacific
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
11
US Defence Outlook – strategic implications for Austal
==> picture [74 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [695 x 259] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Darwin
Gibraltar Hormuz
Philippines
-USMC
LCS OPAREA
- LCS OPAREA
- JHSV OPAREA
- ACPB/CCPB
Panama Canal
OPAREA
SPECFOR JHSV
OPAREA Horn of Africa
LCS Anti-Piracy
OPAREA
Singapore
LCS OPAREA
Perth
HMAS Stirling
----- End of picture text -----
Legend OPAREA: Operating Area SPECFOR: Special Forces
12
US Defence Outlook – short term risks, medium term impact
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
-
U.S. Presidential election in November 2012
-
Re-election of President Obama or the election of the Republican candidate Romney and the extent of eithers mandate will have ramifications for US fiscal policy and specifically the defense budget
-
Budget Control Act 2011
-
Mandates US$1.2 trillion of expenditure cuts between 2013 and 2021 across all areas of US Government expenditure. The Defense budget will wear circa 50% of these cuts
-
Strong bi-partisan views that this blunt instrument will harm US industry and the economic recovery – but as yet there is no agreement as to how to avoid the commencement of the Act in January 2013
-
Could take 12 months or more before this situation is clarified
-
Austal’s US backlog of $2.27 B (9 JHSVs and 5 LCSs) provides contracted income to 2016. Current pressure on the defense budget does not have an immediate impact on Austal as the contracted revenue is under contract from previous budgets. Any impact of current uncertainty will be in the medium term
13
US Defence Outlook – strategic implications for Austal
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
Ships:
-
LCS and JHSV vessels specifically designed for the mission requirements of the littorals
-
U.S. Navy reaffirmed commitment to 57 ship LCS fleet
-
Strategy to forward deploy ships to Singapore and the Middle East announced by US Department of Defense
Conclusion
-
4 ships out of the 10 ship LCS block buy contract secured today, funding for the next two awards in Q1 2013 is expected
-
High likelihood that build out to 57 LCS will occur
==> picture [288 x 201] intentionally omitted <==
Support:
-
U.S. Navy is continuing to develop the Through Life Support strategy for the vessel classes. Complicated by forward deployment mode. Series of smaller contracts coming to market now
-
Austal’s existing global Service Centre footprint closely aligns with potential forward deployment locations. Currently undertaking some work in this space to enhance credibility with Navy’s maintenance function
Conclusion
- Opportunity is substantial. Dependent on ship deliveries
==> picture [291 x 165] intentionally omitted <==
14
Short term outlook for U.S. Navy support work
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
Work completed this year
-
FSF - 1 Sea Fighter refit – Mobile, Alabama
-
Technical Support data for USNS Guam and USNS Puerto Rico - Mobile, Alabama
-
Logistical support for U.S. Navy research vessel Roger Revelle - Perth, Western Australia
Current opportunities
-
JHSV control system maintenance support
-
JHSV post delivery refit works
-
JHSV operation and manning
-
LCS Crew training
-
LCS Mission Bay Simulator
-
LCS Life Cycle Support
-
Hawaiian Superferry (USNS Guam) reclassification and rehabilitation
-
USNS Guam conversion and refit
-
USNS Guam and USNS Puerto Rico operations and maintenance
15
Summary
==> picture [75 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
-
2012 result reflects difficulties experienced in ramping up operations in the US and low levels of activity at the Henderson Shipyard Operation
-
Application of lessons learned appear to be delivering results in the US programs. Improvement will be progressive due to overlapping production and consistency of performance is the key
-
Outlook to 2016 for Austal’s US defense ship building business is solid. Medium term outlook is clouded by short term political uncertainty
-
Cape Class Patrol Boat contract underwrites activity at Henderson until 2015 and thereafter is dependent on securing future defence sales contracts
-
Relocation of commercial construction to the Philippines has increased the size of the addressable market
-
Success in the Philippines will be determined by the ability to efficiently ramp up local production in line with market demand
-
Market opportunities for smaller commercial vessels presently appears to be reasonable, but is still patchy. Clients’ ability to access long term finance is critical
-
Through Life Support of Austal built products will become a key part of the business in the future and early stage opportunities are emerging. Timing will be dependent on the Client determining their support strategy and the ramp up of the delivered fleet
16
Disclaimer
==> picture [74 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
Richard Simons, Chief Financial Officer Telephone: + 61 8 9410 1111 E-mail: [email protected]
Disclaimer
This presentation and any oral presentation accompanying it has been prepared by Austal Limited (“Austal”). It should not be considered as an offer or invitation to subscribe for or purchase any securities in Austal or as an inducement to make an offer or invitation with respect to those securities. No agreement to subscribe for securities in Austal will be entered into on the basis of this presentation.
Our presentation contains “forward-looking” statements or projections based on current expectations. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially due to: the availability of US government funding due to budgetary or debt ceiling constraints; changes in customer priorities; additional costs or schedule revisions. Actual results may also effect the capitalization changes on earnings per share; the allowability of costs under government cost accounting divestitures or joint ventures; the timing and availability of future impact of acquisitions; the timing and availability of future government awards; economic, business and regulatory conditions and other factors. We disclaim any duty to update forward looking statements to reflect new developments.
Accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable laws, Austal makes no representation and can give no assurance, guarantee or warrant, express or implied, as to, and takes not responsibility and assumes no liability for, the authenticity, validity, accuracy, suitability or completeness of, or any errors in or omission, from any information, statement or opinion contained in this presentation.
You should not act or refrain from acting in reliance on this presentation material. This overview of Austal does not purport to be all inclusive or to contain all information which its recipients may require in order to make an informed assessment of Austal’s prospects. You should conduct your own investigation and perform your own analysis in order to satisfy yourself as to the accuracy and completeness of the information, statements and opinions contained in this presentation before making any investment decision
17