AI assistant
AUSQUEST LIMITED — Interim / Quarterly Report 2021
Apr 29, 2021
64406_rns_2021-04-29_a5f608b8-2447-48eb-bbc8-6a28198d7634.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [106 x 109] intentionally omitted <==
Quarterly Report – 31[st] March 2021
HIGHLIGHTS
Australia – Copper, Zinc, Nickel, Gold
-
❑ Diamond drilling (4 holes / ~2,000m) will commence at the Hamilton Copper Project in north-west Queensland during Q2 2021 under the Strategic Alliance Agreement (SAA) with a subsidiary of South32 Limited. Access preparations have been completed.
-
❑ Native Title clearances and access preparations were completed at the Balladonia NickelCopper Project in the Fraser Range Province of Western Australia, paving the way for aircore drilling (~2,200m) of Iron-Oxide Copper-Gold targets to commence in May 2021.
-
❑ The Morrisey Nickel-Copper Project located within the Narryer Terrane of WA was accepted as a new Exploration Opportunity under the SAA. Helicopter Electromagnetic (HEM) surveys are planned for Q2 2021 to locate potential drill targets.
Peru – Copper-Gold
-
❑ A potentially extensive (up to 1.5km²) shallow copper oxide target and strong indications of porphyry copper mineralisation have been identified from Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling results at the Cerro de Fierro Copper Project in southern Peru under the SAA.
-
❑ Better intersections from the RC drilling included 30m at 0.5% Cu, 5.6g/t Ag from surface; 20m @ 0.27% Cu, 2.1g/t Ag from surface; and 28m at 0.57% Cu, 9g/t Ag from 44m.
-
❑ A maiden RC drilling program (~3,000m) has commenced at the Parcoy Copper Project under the SAA to test for large-scale, structurally related replacement-style copper (+/gold) mineralisation.
-
❑ Mineral concessions were granted over the Cerro de Fierro East Copper Project.
Corporate
-
❑ A capital raising of approximately $3.0M was successfully completed during the Quarter through the issue of up to 143 million new shares at 2.1 cents per share and up to 71.5 million unlisted options exercisable at 4.0 cents on or before 1[st] March 2023 to sophisticated and professional investors of Euroz-Hartleys as per the ASX release on 19[th] February 2021.
-
❑ The Company’s Quarter-end cash position was ~$4.9 million.
==> picture [475 x 279] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Project Locations – Australia and Peru
OVERVIEW
Exploration activity during the Quarter focused on drilling operations at the Cerro de Fierro Copper Project in southern Peru and access preparations for the maiden drilling program at the Parcoy Copper Project following the receipt of approvals from the Peruvian Government.
In Australia, a capital raising was successfully completed, improving the Company’s cash position in order to identify and advance new acquisition and/or exploration opportunities both in Australia and Peru that might be of interest to the Company’s strategic alliance partner, South32. Preparations for the onset of drilling at the Hamilton and Balladonia Projects were also completed and a new nickel-copper exploration opportunity was presented and accepted by South32 late in the Quarter.
AUSTRALIA – GOLD and BASE METAL PROJECTS (Copper, Nickel, Zinc)
Hamilton Copper-Gold Project ( 100%
AQD, subject to SAA )
The Hamilton Project is located in north-west Queensland, ~120km south of the world-class Cannington mine. It consists of two
Exploration Licences covering an area of ~520km². Exploration is targeting Iron-Oxide Copper-Gold (IOCG) mineralisation beneath the extensive cover in the region. Limited historical drilling designed to test magnetic and gravity targets has provided evidence for “near-miss” situations which will be the focus of the Company’s exploration program. Exploration work at Hamilton is being funded under the SAA.
During the Quarter access preparation and drill pads were established to enable the diamond drilling program to commence during Q2 2021 as planned.
A total of three diamond drill-holes for ~1,500m are planned to test discrete magnetic/gravity targets that occur within the potassic alteration halo defined by earlier drilling. The size of the alteration halo is similar to that reported at the Ernest Henry copper-gold deposit located ~250km to the north.
The location of drill-sites has been optimised by detailed modelling of recently acquired aeromagnetic data which provided greater control on target geometries and depths. Drillholes are planned to be drilled to depths of ~500 metres ( Figure 2 ).
==> picture [232 x 275] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [236 x 275] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Hamilton Copper Prospect magnetic and gravity models showing proposed drill sites.
A fourth drill-hole (~400m) is planned to test a new magnetic/gravity target located ~15km to the north of the main target area, within a similar interpreted tectono-stratigraphic
setting. The coincident magnetic/gravity response is thought to reflect another possible Ernest Henry style target ( Figure 3 ).
==> picture [228 x 267] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [228 x 265] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Hamilton North Prospect showing magnetic / gravity target and proposed drill site
A drilling contract was signed during the Quarter with drilling support to be provided by local contractors to avoid any issues with border closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Drilling is expected to take
approximately three to four weeks to complete, with assays available within four weeks of the completion of drilling.
Drilling to date has provided strong indications of possible IOCG mineralisation similar to that found at the Ernest Henry deposit. A large potassic alteration zone similar in size to that reported at Ernest Henry has been outlined by five of the 13 holes completed to date. Magnetic targets close to drill-holes with the strongest alteration are being targeted as a priority.
Balladonia Nickel-Copper Project (100% AQD, subject to SAA)
The Balladonia Project is located ~50km south of the Nova–Bollinger nickel-copper deposit. It consists of six Exploration Licences (three granted and three applications) covering an area of ~750km² and is located within a structurally complex region of the Fraser Range Terrain. It is centred above the southern margin of a deep regional gravity anomaly (~30 milligals), which is thought to reflect buried mafic/ultramafic rocks that may be similar to those related to the formation of the Nova deposit. Comparisons with the
Eastern Succession of north-west Queensland (east of Mt Isa), where iron-oxide coppergold (IOCG) and Broken Hill Type (BHT) deposits are known to occur are also apparent. Many of the tenements lie within the Dundas Nature Reserve. Exploration work at Balladonia is being funded under the SAA.
Heritage clearance surveys and access preparations for the planned air-core drilling program were successfully completed during the Quarter. This program (~60 holes for a total of ~2,000m) will test magnetic targets thought to represent possible IOCG and/or BHT-style deposits similar to those found in the Eastern Succession of NW Queensland ( Figure 4 ).
The discovery of anomalous base metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag) at the Company’s Telegraph Prospect and the possible association of base metals with carbonatite intrusions has highlighted the potential for further base metals to be found in this area.
==> picture [475 x 305] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Balladonia Project magnetic image showing targets for air-core drilling
A drilling contract was signed with drilling expected to begin in May and take Morrisey Nickel-Copper Project (100% approximately two weeks to complete. Final AQD, subject to SAA) assays are expected within four weeks of The Morrisey Project is located ~500km north completion of the program. of Perth in Western Australia within the
Narryer Terrane, which forms the northwestern margin of the Yilgarn Craton. It consists of five Exploration Licences (one granted and four applications) covering an area of ~1,200km² parallel to the Yilgarn Craton boundary. The area recently became the focus of industry attention following the discovery by Chalice Mining of the Julimar nickel-copper-PGE deposit north of Perth,
which highlighted the untested nickel-copperPGE potential of the margin of the Western Yilgarn Craton.
During the Quarter, the Morrisey NickelCopper Project was accepted as a new Exploration Opportunity under the SAA following several technical meetings between the parties.
==> picture [239 x 306] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [239 x 306] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Morrisey magnetic images showing regional soil sampling and HEM Survey outline
The Project was initially secured to cover magnetic targets indicative of mafic/ultramafic host rocks in a similar tectono-stratigraphic setting to the Julimar (and possibly Nova-Bollinger) discovery.
Regional soil sampling across priority target areas supported the presence of prospective mafic/ultramafic rock types in the area as well as locating several nickel-copper soil anomalies with potential to reflect nickel sulphide mineralisation (as reported to ASX in December 2020 Quarterly Report).
A proposal to advance this Exploration Opportunity to the drilling stage has been accepted under the SAA and a Helicopter Electromagnetic (HEM) survey to locate potential massive sulphide targets within key target areas has been planned ( Figure 5 ). This
survey is scheduled to commence in late May 2021.
Paterson Gold-Copper Projects (100% AQD)
The Paterson Gold-Copper Projects are located ~250km east of Newman within the Paterson Province of Western Australia. Exploration is targeting large-scale coppergold mineralisation similar to the recent discoveries at Winu and Havieron. The Paterson Project consists of the Gunanya, Madley and Runton Projects which are targeting discrete magnetic targets proximal to regional fault systems in the southern half of the Province similar to those at Winu and Havieron.
During the Quarter, the Company was advised that South32 were withdrawing from the
Gunanya Project as the early reconnaissance drilling, reported to the ASX on 23[rd] December 2020, had not provided sufficient encouragement for them to continue funding the project.
AusQuest will retain 100% of the Gunanya title plus the Madley and Runton Projects within the Paterson Province in order to further assess their copper and gold potential.
At Gunanya, reinterpretation of the aeromagnetic data suggests that Anomaly 2, which was not effectively tested by the maiden drilling program, could occur within sediments (Mundadjini Formation?) to the east of a major structure, and as such, is still considered to be a drilling target.
Detailed modelling of magnetic targets within the Madley Project has been completed, highlighting discrete, depth limited bodies at relatively shallow depths (ranging from 200m to 400m) beneath the extensive sand and sedimentary cover close to regional
structures. The Company is considering its options with regard to these potential drill targets.
Moora Nickel-Copper Project (100% AQD)
The Moora Project is located ~150km north of Perth, Western Australia, within the Jimperding Metamorphic Belt, which forms the south-western margin to the Yilgarn Craton. It consists of five Exploration Licences and covers an area of ~570km². The area recently became the focus of industry attention following the discovery by Chalice Mining of the Julimar nickel-copper-PGE deposit north of Perth, which highlighted the untested nickel-copper-PGE potential of the margin of the Western Yilgarn Craton.
All tenements within the Moora project have now been granted, with the Company having sub-surface mineral rights. Negotiations continued with landowners in order to gain access to selected properties to enable substantive field work to commence.
==> picture [235 x 309] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [234 x 309] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7: Moora tenements on magnetic image showing location of auger samples
During the Quarter, reconnaissance auger sampling (267 samples) to depths of <2 metres was completed over several target areas in order to identify possible host rocks
for nickel and copper mineralisation. Samples were collected at 50m and/or 100m intervals along regional traverses and sent to IntertekGenalysis for multi-element analyses.
Assays received late in the Quarter contained elevated levels of chrome (>250ppm Cr) reflecting possible mafic and ultramafic host rocks in several locations as well as low levels of nickel anomalism (70ppm Ni). The Company’s consultants are currently processing and analysing the data to understand the implications of these results ( Figure 7 ).
New Opportunities (Australia)
Several new opportunities were assessed by the Company’s consultants. A new Exploration Licence application was submitted to secure potential nickel-copper targets in the Jubilee Lake area, ~500km east of Kalgoorlie, following assessment of the
available aeromagnetic data. A heritage agreement over the title is currently being negotiated.
PERU COPPER-GOLD PROJECTS
AusQuest has assembled a strong portfolio of copper-gold prospects along the southern coastal belt of Peru in South America, with numerous targets identified for drilling as possible porphyry copper and/or replacement style (manto) Iron-Oxide Copper-Gold (IOCG) targets with the size potential being of significance to AusQuest (Figure 7). Peru is one of the world’s most prominent destinations for international copper exploration and is considered a prime location for world-class exploration opportunities.
==> picture [474 x 335] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7: Project Locations – Southern Peru
Cerro de Fierro IOCG (100% AQD – South32 option to earn 70%)
The Cerro de Fierro Project is located at the southern end of a recognised Iron-Oxide Copper-Gold (IOCG) metallogenic belt in southern Peru. It lies within ~150km of the Mina Justa deposit (~475Mt @ 0.68% Cu), which is being developed by the Marcobre
Joint Venture. It is subject to an agreement with South32, which can earn a 70% interest in the project by spending a total of US$4.0 million.
During the Quarter, a Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling program comprising 15 holes for a total of 5,048m was successfully
completed to test for near-surface extensions of the copper mineralisation that was previously discovered at depth (~150m to 300m) during earlier drilling programs to the north.
Five of the widely-spaced drill holes intersected shallow copper oxides (at depths
<50m) with thicknesses varying from ~20 to 30 metres and average copper grades ranging from ~0.13% Cu up to ~0.57% Cu with associated silver values from ~1.0g/t Ag and up to 9.0g/t Ag. Significant assay results and drill-hole details are summarised in the table below:
| Drill-Hole | Easting | Northing | From (m) | To (m) | Width (m) | Cu % | Ag g/t |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDFRC001 | 620258 | 8245778 | 206 | 244 | 38 | 0.17 | 1.4 |
| CDFRC002 | 620383 | 8245474 | 228 | 240 | 12 | 0.32 | 3 |
| CDFRC004 | 619475 | 8245066 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 0.5 | 5.6 |
| CDFRC006 | 618740 | 8244468 | 44 | 72 | 28 | 0.57 | 9 |
| CDFRC007 | 619710 | 8245414 | 18 | 36 | 18 | 0.13 | 0.8 |
| CDFRC015 | 619475 | 8245060 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 0.27 | 2.1 |
Compilation of the drilling results with surface rock-chip sampling data and topography demonstrated a strong relationship between anomalous copper values at surface (Cu values from 200ppm up to >1.0% Cu) and topographical relief. Four
drill-holes (CDFRC 003, 005, 008, 010) were found to be located within valleys below the copper-bearing horizon and consequently did not intersect the shallow copper oxides, while six drill-holes were located outside the limits of the mineralisation.
==> picture [465 x 354] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 8: Topographic image showing drill-hole locations and potential copper oxide target area
While the extent, thickness and grade of the shallow copper oxide mineralisation is not fully known at this stage, the possible extent of the mineralised horizon appears to be extensive (up to 1.5km²), subject to further drilling and/or sampling to confirm continuity and grade of the copper within the potential target area.
Figure 8 shows the location of drill-holes with respect to topography as well as the interpreted outline of the potential shallow copper target area. Figures 9 and 10 show the relationship between shallow copper oxides and topography along cross-sections A-B and C-D over the main mineralised area.
==> picture [452 x 137] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 9: Interpreted section A-B showing copper oxides relative to topography
==> picture [454 x 127] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 10: Interpreted section C-D showing copper oxides relative to topography
Assay results from the RC drilling program also provided strong evidence for nearby porphyry copper mineralisation located either lateral to, and/or beneath, the current level of drilling.
Thick zones (>80m) of strong advanced argillic alteration (lithocap) were intersected below the copper oxide layer in eight of the RC drill-holes ( Figure 11 ). Multi-element geochemical analysis of these zones identified pathfinder elemental associations (Mo, W, Te, Bi) and vectors that suggest the drill-holes are close to the base of a lithocap and, by definition, close to potential porphyry copper mineralisation.
Copper sulphides (chalcopyrite) intersected in drill-hole CDFRC015 (copper assays ranging from 0.1% Cu to 0.8% Cu), albeit over a relatively narrow thickness (26 metres), occur in a zone of remnant potassic alteration within the lithocap, providing strong evidence for copper being present within the nearby porphyry(s).
Compilation and analysis of all available data by the Company’s consultants is continuing in consultation with South32, in order to further understand the implications of these results and to plan future exploration programs in the area.
==> picture [454 x 325] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 11: Simplified geology showing RC drill-holes and priority porphyry copper target area
Parcoy IOCG (100% AQD – South32 option to earn 70%)
The Parcoy Project is located near the southern end of a recognised Iron-Oxide Copper-Gold (IOCG) metallogenic belt in southern Peru. It lies within ~100km of the Mina Justa deposit (~475Mt @ 0.68% Cu), and ~50km north-west of the Company’s Cerro de Fierro Project. Geological mapping and rock-chip sampling has identified significant concentrations of copper (+/gold) at surface, reflecting potential mantostyle mineralisation within the volcanic stratigraphy. The project is subject to an agreement with South32, which can earn a 70% interest in the project by spending a total of US$4.5 million.
During the Quarter, access and drill pad preparations were completed to enable the Project’s maiden drilling program to commence in late April 2021.
A total of eight Reverse Circulation (RC) drill-holes for approximately 3,000m is planned in order to test two priority target areas that have been identified by the Company’s rock-chip and soil sampling programs completed during 2019 and 2020 ( Figure 12 ).
Copper (+/-gold) anomalies and associated indicator elements (Mo, Bi, Au, Te, Zn, Sb) within andesitic volcanics have outlined targets for the initial ‘Proof-of-Concept’ drilling, which should determine the Project’s potential for large-scale, structurally related replacement-style copper (+/-gold) mineralisation.
The drilling contract was finalised during the Quarter, with drilling operations expected to commence towards the end of April and take approximately three to four weeks to complete. Final assays are expected within four weeks of completion of drilling.
==> picture [454 x 305] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 12: Parcoy copper distribution showing priority drill-hole locations
Los Otros Porphyry Copper Project (100%
AQD, subject to SAA)
The Los Otros project is located close to the Palaeocene Porphyry Copper Belt of southern Peru, which is the major copper producing region in the country. It lies within 35km of the Cuajone mine (~1.6Bt @ 0.6% Cu), and 40km from the Quellaveco deposit (~1.3Bt @ 0.57% Cu) currently being developed by Anglo American. Exploration work at Los Otros is being funded under the SAA.
At Los Otros, community consultations are now scheduled to commence in early Q2 2021, with the Company still expecting the drill permitting process to be completed around mid-2021. This will allow drilling operations at Los Otros to commence during the second half of 2021.
The porphyry copper target(s) is associated with an area of advanced argillic alteration (~1km²) that appears to have a Palaeocene age date, similar to the age dates reported for the nearby giant porphyry copper deposits.
New Opportunities (Peru)
area near the town of Ilo, where historical drilling suggests there could be potential for buried porphyry copper mineralisation. This program is expected to commence during Q2 2021 and provide sufficient data to enable a decision to be made on the future potential of this area.
CORPORATE
During the Quarter, the Company successfully completed a capital raising of approximately $3.0M through the issue of up to 143 million new shares at 2.1 cents per share and up to 71.5 million unlisted options exercisable at 4.0 cents on or before 1[st] March 2023 to sophisticated and professional investors of Euroz-Hartleys (as per the ASX release on 19[th] February 2021).
During the same period, the Company invested $1.36 million in exploration and had approximately $4.9 million in cash remaining at the end of March. In addition, further funding from South32 to cover agreed work programs (including drilling) over the Strategic Alliance Projects is expected in Q2 2021.
A program of geological mapping and soil sampling is planned for the Puite-Ventura
The Company’s Cashflow Report (Appendix 5B) for the Quarter ended 31 March 2021 is appended to this report. Payments to related parties as shown in section 6 of this report include director salary and superannuation payments of $54,750, and payments of $12,000 for corporate consulting fees to a director.
The Company continues to monitor advice from the Government and health authorities with regard to restrictions imposed by COVID-19, in order to ensure the health and well-being of its employees and contractors.
KEY ACTIVITIES – JUNE 2021 QUARTER
-
Hamilton (Cu-Au) – Complete Stage 3 diamond drilling program;
-
Moora (Ni-Cu) – Continue access agreements to enable wider access, trial HEM;
-
Morrisey (Ni-Cu) – Complete HEM surveys over priority Ni-Cu target areas;
-
Paterson (Cu-Au) – Complete assessment of Projects & plan future programs
-
Peru (Cu-Au) – Assess RC drill results at Cerro de Fierro & plan future programs;
-
Peru (Cu-Au) – Complete maiden RC drilling program at Parcoy;
-
Peru (Cu-Au) – Complete drill permit process at Los Otros;
-
Peru (Cu-Au) – Commence mapping & soil sampling in the Puite-Ventura area.
-
Balladonia (Cu-Au-Ni) – Complete reconnaissance air-core drilling program;
Authorised for release on behalf of the Company by:
==> picture [61 x 48] intentionally omitted <==
Graeme Drew Managing Director
COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT
The details contained in this report that pertain to exploration results are based upon information compiled by Mr Graeme Drew, a full-time employee of AusQuest Limited. Mr Drew is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AUSIMM) and has sufficient experience in the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the December 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (JORC Code). Mr Drew consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based upon his information in the form and context in which it appears.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT
This report contains forward looking statements concerning the projects owned by AusQuest Limited. Statements concerning mining reserves and resources may also be deemed to be forward looking statements in that they involve estimates based on specific assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact and actual events and results may differ materially from those described in the forward looking statements as a result of a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Forward looking statements are based on management’s beliefs, opinions and estimates as of the dates the forward looking statements are made and no obligation is assumed to update forward looking statements if these beliefs, opinions and estimates should change or to reflect other future developments.
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report Soil Sampling – Moora Nickel-Copper Project
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific | •Reconnaissance auger soil sampling was completed |
| techniques | specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals | along regional lines located kilometres apart. |
| under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF | Samples were collected at 50m and 100m intervals | |
| instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad | along each line. | |
| meaning of sampling. | •Sample locations were recorded by hand-held GPS. | |
| • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the | •Soil sampling sites were logged by the sampler and | |
| appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. | recorded on a sampling spread sheet | |
| • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public | •Each soil sample was collected with a Toyota | |
| Report. | Landcruiser mounted mechanized auger by augering | |
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively | vertically to refusal or to a maximum depth of 2m. | |
| simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from | •Approximately 1 - 2kg of -2mm material was | |
| which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other | collected in a numbered calico bag from the bottom | |
| cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold | of the auger sampler. | |
| that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation | •Entire sample submitted for preparation and assay. | |
| types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | ||
| Drilling techniques | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, | •No drilling undertaken |
| Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth | ||
| of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if | ||
| _so, by what method, etc). _ | ||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results | •No drilling undertaken |
| recovery | assessed. | |
| • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature | ||
| of the samples. | ||
| • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether | ||
| sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse | ||
| material. | ||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically | •No drilling undertaken |
| logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, | ||
| mining studies and metallurgical studies. | ||
| • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, |
1
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| channel, etc) photography. | ||
| • _The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. _ | ||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. | •No sub-sampling was completed |
| techniques and | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled | |
| sample preparation | wet or dry. | |
| • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample | ||
| preparation technique. | ||
| • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise | ||
| representivity of samples. | ||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ | ||
| material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half | ||
| sampling. | ||
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being | ||
| _sampled. _ | ||
| Quality of assay | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory | •The samples were submitted to Intertek Genalysis |
| data and | procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. | Maddington, WA, for 48 element suite 4A/MS48 and |
| laboratory tests | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the | Au by 50g fire assay (FA50/OE) |
| parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and | •Samples were subjected to a multi-acid digest, | |
| model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. | including Hydrofluoric, Nitric, Perchloric and | |
| • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, | Hydrochloric acids, in teflon tubes providing close to | |
| external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of | a total digest for most elements. |
|
| bias) and precision have been established. | •Samples were analysed (48 elements) by Inductively | |
| Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. | ||
| Verification of | • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative | •Field sample locations were compiled onto Excel |
| sampling and | company personnel. | spreadsheets for merging with assay data. |
| assaying | • The use of twinned holes. | •Digital data is regularly backed-up on the company’s |
| • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data | servers. | |
| storage (physical and electronic) protocols. | ||
| • _Discuss any adjustment to assay data. _ | ||
| Location of data | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole | •Sample locations are established with a handheld |
| points | surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource | GPS to +/- 5m accuracy. |
| estimation. | •Grid system used is GDA94 Zone 50. | |
| • Specification of the grid system used. | ||
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | ||
| Data spacing and | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | •Samples were collected on regional lines located |
| distribution | • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of | kilometres apart at 50m and 100m intervals along |
| geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore | each line. | |
| _Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. _ |
2
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| • _Whether sample compositing has been applied. _ | ||
| Orientation of data | • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible | •Sample lines were oriented perpendicular to the |
| in relation to | structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. | strike of the inferred stratigraphy. |
| geological | • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key | |
| structure | mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this | |
| should be assessed and reported if material. | ||
| Sample security | • The measures taken to ensure sample security. | •Samples were securely sealed in the field, followed |
| by packing into larger sealed plastic bags or boxes | ||
| for transport by AusQuest personnel to the assay | ||
| laboratory. | ||
| Audits or reviews | • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | •No audits or reviews have been carried out on the |
| sampling to date. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement | • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or | •The Moora Project is located immediately west and |
| and land tenure | material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding | northwest of Dalwallinu, approximately 230 km |
| status | royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and | north-east of Perth in Western Australia. |
| environmental settings. | •Tenement holdings include Exploration Licences | |
| • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known | E70/5388, E70/5389, E70/5401, E70/5402 and | |
| impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | E70/5418, all 100% held by AusQuest Limited. | |
| •Access agreements are in the process of being | ||
| negotiated over freehold land. | ||
| •The tenements are all in good standing. | ||
| •Aboriginal heritage surveys are completed where | ||
| required ahead of ground disturbing activities. | ||
| Exploration done | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | •Previous exploration is very limited and was mainly |
| by other parties | focused on bauxite and BIF associated magnetite | |
| iron ore. | ||
| •Limited aircore, RC drilling and surface sampling | ||
| was reported, targeting magnetic anomalies as | ||
| possible iron ore deposits. | ||
| •DetaiIed aeromagnetic datawere available overthe |
3
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| northern half of EL 70/7389,5401, 5402 and the | ||
| extreme western part of EL 70/5388 as part of the | ||
| search for iron ore. These data are being used in the | ||
| current exploration of the area. | ||
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | •The Moora Project is targeting nickel-copper-PGE |
| mineralisation in mafic/ultramafic intrusions within | ||
| the extreme western part of the Yilgarn Craton. | ||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration | •No drilling undertaken |
| Information | results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill | |
| holes: | ||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar |
||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the |
||
| drill hole collar | ||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
||
o down hole length and interception depth |
||
o hole length. |
||
| • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is | ||
| not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the | ||
| _report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. _ | ||
| Data aggregation | • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum | •No drilling undertaken |
| methods | and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades | |
| are usually Material and should be stated. | ||
| • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and | ||
| longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation | ||
| should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be | ||
| shown in detail. | ||
| • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be | ||
| _clearly stated. _ | ||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration | •No drilling undertaken |
| between | Results. | |
| mineralisation | • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, | |
| widths and | its nature should be reported. | |
| intercept lengths | • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a | |
| _clear statement to this effect(eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). _ |
4
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should | •Soil auger sample locations are provided in the ASX |
| be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, | release. | |
| but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate | ||
| _sectional views. _ | ||
| Balanced reporting | • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, |
•Interpretation of the regional soil assay data is in |
| representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be | progress. | |
| _practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. _ | ||
| Other substantive | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including | •The area was selected for sampling based on |
| exploration data | (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; | geological and geophysical data interpretations by |
| geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; | the company. | |
| metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock | ||
| _characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. _ | ||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or | •Proposals of further work will be done after a |
| depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | thorough analysis of the data is completed. | |
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the | ||
| main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information | ||
| _is not commercially sensitive. _ |
5
Rule 5.5
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report
Name of entity
| Name of entity | Name of entity |
|---|---|
| AUSQUEST LIMITED | |
| ABN 35 091 542 451 |
Quarter ended (“current quarter”) |
| 35 091 542 451 | 31 March 2021 |
| Consolidated statement of cash flows | Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (9 months) $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Cash flows from operating activities 1.1 Receipts from customers 1.2 Payments for (a) exploration & evaluation (b) development (c) production (d) staff costs (e) administration and corporate costs 1.3 Dividends received (see note 3) 1.4 Interest received 1.5 Interest and other costs of finance paid 1.6 Income taxes paid 1.7 Government grants and tax incentives 1.8 Other (R&D Refund) 1.9 Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
203 - - - (52) (362) - - (2) - 15 761 |
568 - - - (143) (744) - 1 (4) - 122 761 |
| 563 | 561 | |
| 2. Cash flows from investing activities 2.1 Payments to acquire or for: (a) entities (b) tenements (c) property, plant and equipment (d) exploration & evaluation (e) investments (f) other non-current assets |
- - - (1,357) - - |
- - (2) (4,251) - - |
ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.
Page 1
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report
| Consolidated statement of cash flows | Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (9 months) $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2 Proceeds from the disposal of: (a) entities (b) tenements (c) property, plant and equipment (d) investments (e) other non-current assets 2.3 Cash flows from loans to other entities 2.4 Dividends received (see note 3) 2.5 Other: - Funding received from South 32 under the Strategic Alliance Agreement 2.6 Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
- - - - - - - 2,275 |
- - - - - - - 3,759 |
| 918 | (494) | |
| 3. Cash flows from financing activities 3.1 Proceeds from issues of equity securities (excluding convertible debt securities) 3.2 Proceeds from issue of convertible debt securities 3.3 Proceeds from exercise of options 3.4 Transaction costs related to issues of equity securities or convertible debt securities 3.5 Proceeds from borrowings 3.6 Repayment of borrowings 3.7 Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings 3.8 Dividends paid 3.9 Other - Lease liability payments 3.10 Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
2,350 - - (147) - - - - (3) |
2,350 - - (147) - - - - (40) |
| 2,200 | 2,163 |
ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.
Page 2
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report
| 4. Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
||
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 4.2 Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) 4.3 Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) 4.4 Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) 4.5 Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held 4.6 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
1,224 563 918 2,200 5 |
2,719 561 (494) 2,163 (39) |
| 4,910 | 4,910 | |
| 5. Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Previous quarter $A’000 |
| 5.1 Bank balances 5.2 Call deposits 5.3 Bank overdrafts 5.4 Other (provide details) 5.5 Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
4,910 - - - |
1,224 - - - |
| 4,910 | 1,224 | |
| 6. Payments to related parties of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter $A'000 |
|
| 6.1 Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their associates included in item 1 19 6.2 Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their associates included in item 2 48 Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an explanation for, such payments. |
19 | |
| 48 |
ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.
Page 3
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report
| 7. 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 |
Financing facilities Note: the term “facility’ includes all forms of financing arrangements available to the entity. Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the sources of finance available to the entity. Total facility amount at quarter end $A’000 Amount drawn at quarter end $A’000 Loan facilities - - Credit standby arrangements - - Other (please specify) - - Total financing facilities - - Unused financing facilities available at quarter end - Include in the box below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional financing facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include a note providing details of those facilities as well. |
Total facility amount at quarter end $A’000 |
Amount drawn at quarter end $A’000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | ||
| - | - | ||
| - | - | ||
| - | - | ||
| N/A |
| 8. | Estimated cash available for future operating activities | $A’000 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9) 563 (Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing activities) (item 2.1(d)) (1,357) Total relevant outgoings (item 8.1 + item 8.2) (794) Cash and cash equivalents at quarter end (item 4.6) 4,910 Unused finance facilities available at quarter end (item 7.5) - Total available funding (item 8.4 + item 8.5) 4,910 Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided by item 8.3) 6.18 Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings (ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as “N/A”. Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding available must be included in item 8.7. If item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, please provide answers to the following questions: 8.8.1 Does the entity expect that it will continue to have the current level of net operating cash flows for the time being and, if not, why not? |
563 (1,357) (794) 4,910 - |
| 4,910 | ||
| N/A | ||
| 8.8.2 Has the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to take any steps, to raise further cash to fund its operations and, if so, what are those steps and how likely does it believe that they will be successful? |
||
| N/A |
ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.
Page 4
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report
8.8.3 Does the entity expect to be able to continue its operations and to meet its business objectives and, if so, on what basis?
N/A
Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be answered.
Compliance statement
-
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
-
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Date: 30 April 2021
Authorised by: By the Board (Name of body or officer authorising release – see note 4)
Notes
-
This quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report provide a basis for informing the market about the entity’s activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information over and above the minimum required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.
-
If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
-
Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
-
If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors, you can insert here: “By the board”. If it has been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your board of directors, you can insert here: “By the [ name of board committee – eg Audit and Risk Committee ]”. If it has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure committee, you can insert here: “By the Disclosure Committee”.
-
If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations , the board should have received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion, the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained, that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively.
ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.
Page 5