AI assistant
AUSQUEST LIMITED — Annual Report 2012
Sep 18, 2012
64406_rns_2012-09-18_c153ec9c-d2b9-4b85-bfb1-a7e956e5cd15.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [103 x 120] intentionally omitted <==
AUSQUEST LIMITED
ABN 35 091 542 451
Annual report for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
Annual financial report for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
| Page No | |
|---|---|
| Corporate directory | 2 |
| Exploration report | 3 |
| Corporate governance statement | 10 |
| Directors’ report | 16 |
| Auditor’s independence declaration | 22 |
| Independent auditor’s report | 23 |
| Directors’ declaration | 25 |
| Consolidated statement of comprehensive income | 26 |
| Consolidated statement of financial position | 27 |
| Consolidated statement of changes in equity | 28 |
| Consolidated statement of cash flows | 29 |
| Notes to the financial statements | 30 |
AusQuest Ltd Corporate directory
Corporate directory
Board of Directors
Mr Greg Hancock Non‐Executive Chairman Mr Graeme Drew Managing Director Mr John Ashley Non‐Executive Director Mr Chris Ellis Non‐Executive Director Mr Craig Moulton Non Executive Director
Company Secretary
Mr Darren Crawte
Registered Office
C/‐Nexia Perth, Level 7, The Quadrant, 1 William Street, Perth WA 6000
Principal Office
8 Kearns Crescent Ardross WA 6153 Telephone: (61 8) 9364 3866 Facsimile: (61 8) 9364 4892 Website : www.ausquest.com.au
Auditors
HLB Mann Judd Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000
Share Registry
Advanced Share Registry Services Pty Ltd 150 Stirling Highway Nedlands WA 6009 Telephone: (61 8) 9389 8033 Facsimile: (61 8) 9389 7871 Website: www.advancedshare.com.au
Securities Exchange
Australian Securities Exchange (Home Exchange: Perth, Western Australia) Code: AQD
2
AusQuest Ltd Exploration report
Exploration Report – 2012 Annual Report
HIGHLIGHTS
Gold (Burkina Faso, West Africa)
-
100% equity acquired in the Comoe Project, which includes the Phaco Hill gold‐silver discovery.
-
Extensive programme of reconnaissance RAB drilling (~27,000m) completed as an initial test of 25 gold‐in‐soil anomalies.
-
High‐grade intersections returned from six prospect areas, with shallow gold intersections above 1g/t Au returned from numerous other locations.
-
Best results include:
-
12m @ 3.82g/t Au from surface – Phaco SE prospect
-
4m @ 8.66g/t Au from surface – Cisaillee prospect
-
4m @ 4.69g/t Au – Nandrefa prospect
-
1m @ 4.63g/t Au – Lagnin prospect
-
4m @ 1.9g/t Au – Diarabokoko prospect
-
8m @ 2.01g/t Au – Vipere prospect
-
High‐grade gold intersection at Phaco SE thought to reflect a possible extension to the known mineralization at Phaco Hill.
-
AusQuest’s land‐holding in Burkina Faso increased to ~1,100km² through the acquisition of two Exploration Permits covering artisanal workings along the NE margin of the Banfora Greenstone Belt.
‐ Copper Gold (Peru) (Joint Venture with Cliffs Natural Resources Exploration)
-
Potential porphyry‐style copper‐gold mineralisation identified from very limited rock exposure at the Pampa Colorado Prospect.
-
Assays of up to 1.68% Cu and 12g/t Au reported from sampling of sparse epithermal quartz veins scattered over a wide area (~4km²). There are no visible signs of previous drilling in the area.
-
74 of 154 Mineral Claim applications granted, with the claims covering potential IOCG targets along the southern coastal belt of Peru. The Company controls ~1,450km² of title.
-
Exploration activity escalated in the second half of 2012 to identify targets for drilling. This work is being funded 50% by CNRE under the joint venture.
Manganese and Base Metals (Australia)
-
Extensive manganiferous outcrop located at upper Windidda Limestone contact at the Stanley Project (WA), highlighting new manganese potential within the Earaheedy Basin.
-
Broad zones of anomalous gold and base metals intersected by RC drilling at the Dundas Project (WA), highlighting a possible mineralised structure that is largely untested.
3
AusQuest Ltd Exploration report
Overview
The 2012 financial year was another period of active exploration for AusQuest in a number of areas.
Exploration activity in Burkina Faso, West Africa continued unabated once the Company obtained full ownership of the project by acquiring the outstanding 20% equity from Endeavour Mining.
This year’s program focused on testing gold targets outside the main Phaco Hill prospect – where a gold‐silver VMS deposit was discovered in 2011 – in order to establish the broader exploration potential of the region and set priorities for future programs.
This work was successful in identifying five priority areas for follow‐up drilling, while highly anomalous results were returned from multiple prospect areas.
In Peru, field work commenced late in the financial year once tenements covering target areas for IOCG mineralisation identified by the Company’s aeromagnetic survey, began to be granted (31[st] March 2012).
Approximately half of the Company’s 154 applications (covering a total area of ~1,450km²) have now been granted and ground work is currently underway in several locations. Initial sample results from the Pampa Colorado prospect have provided significant encouragement to accelerate programs at this prospect.
These offshore programs represent a diversification of the Company’s exploration interests into areas which are considered highly prospective for gold and base metals but are under‐explored by comparison with much of Australia.
In Australia, exploration activities focused on drill‐testing targets that had previously been identified at Plenty River (NT) and Dundas (WA), and evaluating the manganese potential of the Stanley Project located within the Earaheedy Basin in WA.
Results from Stanley remain encouraging with new areas of extensive manganese outcrop located, but results from Plenty River and Dundas have resulted in the Company withdrawing from Plenty River and considering looking for a partner at Dundas to follow‐up on leads generated by this year’s program.
A number of new opportunities were also considered during the year but no new projects have been acquired at this stage.
Gold (Burkina Faso, West Africa)
During the year, the Company completed a Share Sale and Royalty Agreement with Endeavour Exploration Limited (“Endeavour”) to purchase its equity in the Comoe Project in exchange for a 1.5% Net Smelter Royalty, payable out of future production revenue.
This transaction resulted in the Comoe Joint Venture being dissolved and AusQuest acquiring 100 per cent ownership of the Project, which includes the Phaco Hill gold‐silver discovery.
Previous drilling at Phaco Hill in 2011 outlined gold (+/‐ silver, lead and zinc) mineralisation associated with a laterally extensive zone (4km x 1km) of sulphidic and aluminous alteration that is typical of gold‐bearing volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) systems found elsewhere in the world.
At least three separate high‐grade gold lodes had been identified by drilling, all of which remain poorly defined and open in all directions.
During the year, the Company completed an extensive reconnaissance RAB drilling programme comprising 784 holes for a total of ~27,000m to test up to 25 gold‐soil anomalies within the Comoe Project area and determine their potential to host significant new gold discoveries.
The initial RAB coverage was widely spaced using drill sections at 125m to 400m intervals and drill‐holes 25 to 50m apart. All RAB holes were drilled to refusal with hole depths varying from as shallow as 3m to 70m in places (average 34m).
Drill holes were sampled on a 4m composite basis. Long turnaround times experienced during the year for assay results from the in‐country laboratories affected the Company’s ability to plan follow‐up drilling of interesting results before the start of the wet season.
4
AusQuest Ltd Exploration report
Prospects drilled during the year are shown in Table 1 and all RAB assay results using a 0.35g/tAu cut off are shown in Table 2:
Table 1 – Prospects Drilled (2012)
| Tenement | Prospect | RAB Holes | Metres Drilled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Komoe | Cisaillee | 71 | 1,290 |
| Flutiau | 22 | 510 | |
| Phaco Hill NE | 31 | 989 | |
| Phaco Hill South Ext. | 35 | 800 | |
| Grano | 18 | 310 | |
| Phaco East | 7 | 191 | |
| K3 | 18 | 191 | |
| Karite Nez | 14 | 161 | |
| K5 | 13 | 91 | |
| Tondoura | Arbore | 37 | 1,443 |
| Python Sud | 43 | 1,646 | |
| Cobra | 20 | 1,039 | |
| Mamba | 57 | 2,163 | |
| Vipere | 22 | 713 | |
| Confluence | 33 | 1,292 | |
| Constrictor | 9 | 251 | |
| Moutieredougou | 96 | 5,156 | |
| Moutieredougou NW | 7 | 330 | |
| Kangounadeni | Diarabakoko East | 32 | 1,636 |
| Diarabakoko EM | 24 | 854 | |
| Tiefora | Nyarara | 11 | 398 |
| Koroboro East | 38 | 1,467 | |
| Finkere | Nandrefa | 60 | 1,957 |
| Lagnin | 50 | 1,565 | |
| Lagnin East | 13 | 552 | |
| TOTAL | 781 | 26,995 |
5
AusQuest Ltd Exploration report
Table 2 – RAB Drilling Assay Results (using 0.35g/t Au cut‐off)
| Prospect | Hole number |
Easting | Northing | From (m) | Tto (m) | Interval (m) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisaillee | KPRB0003 | 329923 | 1104503 | 16 | 24 | 8 | 0.50 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0006 | 329847 | 1104498 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 0.35 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0016 | 329603 | 1104501 | 24 | 28 | 4 | 0.41 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0023 | 329926 | 1104754 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 0.70 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0024 | 329899 | 1104753 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8.66 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0033 | 329927 | 1104372 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0.90 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0037 | 329723 | 1104375 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 0.50 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0046 | 329798 | 1104251 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0.39 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0047 | 329773 | 1104249 | 4 | 28 | 24 | 0.62 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0049 | 329747 | 1104248 | 16 | 20 | 4 | 0.60 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0052 | 329668 | 1104249 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.35 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0052 | 329668 | 1104249 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 0.55 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0052 | 329668 | 1104249 | 20 | 21 | 1 | 0.59 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0053 | 329648 | 1104253 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.43 |
| Cisaillee | KPRB0071 | 329472 | 1104002 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 0.42 |
| Phaco NE | KPRB0116 | 329827 | 1102797 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 0.36 |
| Phaco NE | KPRB0121 | 329703 | 1102800 | 16 | 27 | 11 | 0.50 |
| Phaco NE | KPRB0123 | 329653 | 1102798 | 16 | 20 | 4 | 0.43 |
| Phaco NE | KPRB0124 | 329621 | 1102797 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 0.37 |
| Phaco SE | KPRB0126 | 329755 | 1101996 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 3.82 |
| Phaco SE | KPRB0153 | 329472 | 1101702 | 28 | 32 | 4 | 0.40 |
| Arbore | TPRB0009 | 301702 | 1126998 | 32 | 40.5 | 8.5 | 0.76 |
| Arbore | TPRB0018 | 301650 | 1127200 | 32 | 36 | 4 | 0.62 |
| Arbore | TPRB0020 | 301800 | 1127200 | 16 | 20 | 4 | 0.45 |
| Arbore | TPRB0030 | 301877 | 1127399 | 32 | 36 | 4 | 1.40 |
| Arbore | TPRB0033 | 301906 | 1127520 | 16 | 28 | 12 | 0.50 |
| Arbore | TPRB0036 | 301848 | 1127409 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 0.36 |
| Python Sud | TPRB0064 | 299900 | 1127400 | 36 | 40 | 4 | 0.66 |
| Cobra | TPRB0093 | 307901 | 1138900 | 56 | 60 | 4 | 0.82 |
| Mamba | TPRB0108 | 307993 | 1137297 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 1.10 |
| Mamba | TPRB0144 | 307549 | 1136200 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.49 |
| Vipere | TPRB0162 | 306210 | 1135153 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 2.01 |
| Constrictor | TPRB0215 | 303930 | 1132550 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 0.50 |
| Moutieredougou | TPRB0247 | 302933 | 1136300 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 0.75 |
| Moutieredougou | TPRB0249 | 302850 | 1136302 | 48 | 49 | 1 | 0.35 |
| Moutieredougou NW | TPRB0265 | 301901 | 1136299 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 0.48 |
| Diara East | GPRB0005 | 311622 | 1155496 | 16 | 20 | 4 | 0.36 |
| Diara EM | GPRB0028 | 310399 | 1157198 | 48 | 52 | 4 | 0.50 |
| Diara East | GPRB0048 | 311601 | 1155389 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 1.88 |
| Diara East | GPRB0049 | 311656 | 1155499 | 28 | 32 | 4 | 0.39 |
| Nandrefa | FPRB0002 | 343988 | 1193054 | 28 | 32 | 4 | 4.69 |
| Nandrefa | FPRB0018 | 343193 | 1193048 | 24 | 29 | 5 | 0.37 |
| Nandrefa | FPRB0039 | 343750 | 1192804 | 20 | 24 | 4 | 0.45 |
| Nandrefa | FPRB0046 | 343450 | 1192797 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 0.68 |
| Nandrefa | FPRB0065 | 338301 | 1183049 | 20 | 24 | 4 | 0.53 |
| Lagnin | FPRB0070 | 338049 | 1183050 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0.84 |
| Lagnin | FPRB0076 | 338650 | 1183302 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 0.55 |
| Lagnin | FPRB0081 | 338353 | 1183300 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.62 |
| Lagnin | FPRB0094 | 338849 | 1183678 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 0.64 |
| Lagnin | FPRB0098 | 338498 | 1183675 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.58 |
| Lagnin | FPRB0098 | 338498 | 1183675 | 32 | 33 | 1 | 4.63 |
| Lagnin | FPRB0099 | 338452 | 1183678 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.61 |
| Lagnin | FPRB0104 | 338290 | 1184154 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0.40 |
| Lagnin East | FPRB0117 | 340296 | 1183547 | 36 | 40 | 4 | 0.37 |
6
AusQuest Ltd Exploration report
Shallow gold intersections in excess of 1g/t Au were returned at numerous sites, with the more significant intersections occurring in at least five areas:
-
Phaco SE prospect : A high‐grade gold intersection (12m grading 3.82g/t Au from surface) reported ~200m south‐east of Phaco Hill is thought to represent the onset of a new gold zone(s) associated with the Phaco Hill gold‐silver mineralisation identified in 2011;
-
Cisaillee prospect : an intersection of 4m at 8.66g/t Au on the northern‐most drill section and several thicker intersections to the south including 24m at 0.62g/t Au were located in pyritic and siliceous rocks where continuations of the Phaco Hill volcanic sequence are thought to intersect the Siniko Shear zone;
-
Nandrefa prospect : intersections of 4 metres @ 4.69g/t Au and 16 metres @ 0.46g/t Au remain open in all directions. The gold occurs within deformed and altered granodiorite on the western side of a major NNE trending shear zone;
-
Lagnin prospect : several highly anomalous intersections occur within altered granodiorite, including a 1 metre interval @ 4.63g/t Au from an end of hole sample of sheared rock, suggesting gold mineralisation could be present below the depth of drilling;
-
Diarabokoko East prospect : an intersection of 4m @ 1.9g/t Au was returned along strike from RC drilling results of 12m @ 1.5g/t Au and 4m @ 1.86g/t Au reported from limited drilling in 2010;
At Phaco Hill, RAB results extended the mineralisation trend by several hundred metres both to the north and south of RC and Diamond drilling coverage completed in 2011. Intersections of 11m @ 0.5g/t Au, 6.5m @ 0.34g/t Au, and 14m @ 0.26g/t Au help define the trend.
Results from Phaco NE in particular are considered encouraging (11m @ 0.5g/t Au) as they coincide with a base metal soil anomaly thought to reflect a continuation of the sulphide mineralisation associated with the Phaco Hill discovery. Base metal assays from the RAB drilling are pending.
Several prospects in the Tondoura area also produced intersections in excess of 1g/t Au, but at this stage these are considered lower priority targets as mineralisation is most likely narrow and discontinuous. These include 8m @ 2.0g/t Au from Vipere , 4m @ 1.1g/t Au from Mamba , and 15m @ 0.53g/t Au from Abore . Graphite and quartz veins were noted at several sites and appear to be associated with the anomalous gold sections.
The Company believes the above results provide an excellent first step in assessing the gold potential of the Comoe Project, but additional drilling is required before the full potential of the area can be determined.
Regional and detailed soil sampling programs were completed over the western portion of the Tondoura tenement which had not been previously sampled, and over selected areas within the Logoniegue and Komoe tenements, to test structural targets highlighted by geological assessment of the aeromagnetic data.
A total of ~3,000 samples were collected on grids ranging from 500m x 200m to 125m x 50m for the more detailed infill sampling. Assay results have outlined numerous (+50ppb Au) gold anomalies that either formed part of the RAB drilling program for 2012, or still remain to be tested. Of particular note are several gold‐soil anomalies within the new Logoniegue tenement that occur along the southern extension of the Phaco Hill mineralised trend which have not been tested.
Regional geological mapping within the Komoe tenement continued, locating a new gold prospect ( Sommet ) at the northern end of the Logoniegue granodiorite where extensive magnetite alteration was found in the enclosing sediments.
Modelling of aeromagnetic data suggests the alteration occurs in shallow dipping lenses and is associated with structures wrapping around the end of the granodiorite, providing favourable sites for the concentration of gold mineralisation. Historic soil sampling in the area was very wide spaced and compromised by extensive alluvial cover. Several localised anomalies of +50ppb Au warrant testing.
During the year, the Company acquired two new Exploration Permits (Noumousso and Kapogouan) along the NE margin of the Banfora Greenstone Belt from private interests, increasing its total land‐holding in the area to ~1,100km². The tenements cover similar geological sequences to those found within the Komoe tenement, which contains the Phaco Hill gold‐silver discovery.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will acquire a 100% interest in the tenements, subject to a 1.5% NSR on production, by completing annualised payments totalling US$205,000 over a 3‐year period.
7
AusQuest Ltd Exploration report
‐ Copper Gold (Peru)
During the year, the Company announced that it had entered into an exploration joint venture with its strategic partner, Cliffs Natural Resources Exploration Inc (CNRE), to jointly identify, explore and evaluate potential Iron Oxide Copper Gold (IOCG) and other mineral deposits in south‐western Peru.
The agreement calls for each party to contribute up to US$2.0 million on a 50:50 basis to the initial prospect identification stage, with CNRE then being required to sole‐fund further evaluation of selected projects (at CNRE election) up to US$4.0 million, in order to secure their 70% interest in the Project. Details of the agreement were reported to the ASX on 21[st] October 2011.
Peru is considered highly prospective for large Iron Oxide Copper Gold (IOCG) and porphyry copper deposits but is relatively under‐explored when compared to its neighbour Chile, which is the world’s largest copper producer.
A regional aeromagnetic survey flown by the joint venture over the southern coastal region, which is largely under extensive cover, was used to identify areas of interest and tenement applications were subsequently submitted by Questdor SAC, a wholly‐owned subsidiary of AusQuest that is registered in Peru.
This is the first time, to the Company’s knowledge, that such an extensive regional survey has been flown in this coastal region, and the Company believes that targets identified by the survey will provide significant new exploration opportunities for the Joint Venture.
A total of 155 applications have now been submitted (~1,450km²) covering 14 areas considered to be prospective for IOCG mineralisation. To date, 72 Mineral Claims have been granted and reconnaissance work has commenced to evaluate their potential.
Early results from the Pampa Colorado prospect, east of Ilo, have identified numerous occurrences of small epithermal quartz veins containing anomalous copper values ranging from 0.3% to 1.68% Cu and occasional gold up to 12g/t Au within an area of ~4km². The veins are often associated with weak‐to‐moderate propylitic alteration, suggesting the possibility of a nearby (buried) porphyry‐style copper and gold system.
Orientation soil sampling and trial geophysical surveys are currently underway in several areas, including Pampa Colorado, to find the best way of targeting buried mineralisation in this terrain. Future plans for the Company include an escalation of exploration activity in Peru over the remainder of 2012 and in 2013.
The Company is encouraged by its prospects in southern Peru given the limited field work completed to date, and is aiming to advance at least one prospect to the drilling stage by the end of 2012.
Manganese and Base Metals (Australia)
During the year, exploration activities focused on drill‐testing targets that had previously been identified at Plenty River (NT) and Dundas (WA) Projects, as well as evaluating the manganese potential of the Stanley Project located within the Earaheedy Basin in WA.
Stanley Project
The Stanley Project, which covers an area of approximately 2,300km², is located 170km east of Wiluna within the Earaheedy Basin in WA. Manganese (up to ~50% Mn at surface) has been reported from numerous locations and at different stratigraphic positions around the Basin, highlighting the area’s potential to contain a range of manganese deposits.
During the year, a detailed review of available data was undertaken and the tenement portfolio was rationalised in order to retain the higher priority targets. Interpretation of low‐level aerial photography was also completed highlighting new areas of potential interest which were associated with the upper contact of the Windidda Limestone, an analogous position to the manganese deposits in the Woodie Woodie area in the eastern Pilbara of WA.
Field reconnaissance of photo features confirmed the presence of an extensive manganese‐rich horizon extending over at least 10km with possible correlations to the Dome prospect some 60km to the west. The manganese horizon appears thin (1 metre) at surface, but is shallow dipping (<5°) and has an extensive strike length, providing good scope for thicker intervals of manganese mineralisation to be found along its strike length.
Detailed mapping and geophysical surveys (EM, gravity) are being initiated to identify targets for drilling.
At the Niminga and Dome prospects, VTEM and gravity targets interpreted to reflect possible manganese and/or clay alteration along structures remain to be drill tested. This work was postponed until the review was completed and will now form part of the ongoing testing program.
8
AusQuest Ltd Exploration report
Dundas Gold
The Dundas Gold Project is located approximately 100km east‐southeast of Norseman in WA and covers an area of ~1,100km² within a structurally complex region 400km southwest of the Tropicana gold discovery and 80km south‐west of the new Nova nickel‐copper discovery by Sirius Resources.
During the year, RC drilling (32 holes/3,542m) was undertaken to test gold and base metal targets identified by shallow RAB drilling and subsequent ground electromagnetic (EM) surveys.
Wide zones of elevated gold (20 to 140ppb Au) and base metals (0.5 to 26ppm Ag, 100 to 3,000ppm Cu, 10 to 770ppm Pb, and 100 to 4,200ppm Zn) were intersected including narrow zones of +1g/t Au reported in several holes, but no ore grade intersections were located.
The gold zones are dominantly hosted within felsic gneisses similar to the host rocks reported from the Tropicana gold deposit to the north, and are closely associated with a regional NNW trending structure that was outlined by the EM survey. The potential of this structure along strike remains to be assessed.
Other Projects
During the year, work was discontinued at the Plenty River and Mt Ramsay projects following disappointing results.
At the Earoo Nickel Project, located ~130km north‐west of Southern Cross in the Yilgarn region of WA, interpretation of ground electromagnetic data confirmed at least one anomaly of potential interest close to the mafic sill contact. Discussions commenced with interested parties for a possible farm‐out of the project.
At the Teriwa Copper‐Gold Project, located ~350km southwest of Mt Isa in western Queensland, a gravity survey was planned to define a possible drill target, but is yet to be undertaken. The Teriwa project represents a possible Olympic Dam‐style geophysical target at depths of approximately 400 metres below the surface.
The second payment of $1.5 million for the sale of the Company’s Rocklea Iron Ore Project was received from Dragon Energy in January 2012. The final payment of $750,000 is due on the 19[th] January 2013. To date the Company has received a total of $5.375 million. Should payment not be made, the tenement will revert to AusQuest and its Joint Venture partners.
Business Development
AusQuest continues to search for advanced exploration projects with definite signs of mineralisation and significant upside potential, both within Australia and offshore, which could add significant value to the Company.
Financial
AusQuest remains in a strong financial position with $5 million in cash (as at the end of June 2012) to underpin ongoing exploration activities.
The details contained in the Annual report that pertain to exploration results are based upon information compiled by Mr Graeme Drew, full time employee of AusQuest Limited. Mr Drew is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AUSIMM) and has sufficient experience in the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Resources’. Mr Drew consents to the inclusion of the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
9
AusQuest Ltd Corporate governance statement
Corporate governance statement
INTRODUCTION
The Company is committed to implementing sound standards of corporate governance. In determining what those standards should involve, the Company has had regard to the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations with 2010 Amendments (“Recommendations”).
Further information about the Company’s corporate governance practices is set out on the Company’s website at www.ausquest.com.au. In accordance with the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations with 2010 Amendments, information published on the Company’s website includes charters (for the Board and its committees), the Company’s code of conduct and other policies and procedures relating to the Board and its responsibilities.
PRINCIPLE 1: LAY SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT
Recommendation 1.1 – Establish and disclose the functions reserved to the board and those delegated to senior executives.
The board has established functions that are reserved for the board, as separate from those functions discharged by the Managing Director and are summarised in the Company’s Board Charter which is available on the Company’s website.
The Board retains responsibility for the following key areas:
-
(a) Providing leadership for and supervision of the Company’s senior management. The Board provides the strategic direction of the Company and regularly measures the progression by senior management of that strategic direction;
-
(b) overseeing the Company, including its control and accountability systems;
-
(c) appointing the chief executive officer, or equivalent, for a period and on terms as the directors see fit and, where appropriate, removing the chief executive officer, or equivalent;
-
(d) ratifying the appointment and, where appropriate, the removal of senior executives;
-
(e) approving the Company's policies on risk oversight and management, internal compliance and control, Code of Conduct , and legal compliance;
-
(f) satisfying itself that senior management has developed and implemented a sound system of risk management and internal control in relation to financial reporting risks and reviewed the effectiveness of the operation of that system;
-
(g) assessing the effectiveness of senior management's implementation of systems for managing material business risk including the making of additional enquiries and to request assurances regarding the management of material business risk, as appropriate;
-
(h) monitoring, reviewing and challenging senior management's performance and implementation of strategy;
-
(i) ensuring appropriate resources are available to senior management;
-
(j) approving and monitoring the progress of major capital expenditure, capital management, and acquisitions and divestitures;
-
(k) monitoring the financial performance of the Company;
-
(l) ensuring the integrity of the Company's financial and other reporting (with the assistance of the Audit Committee, if applicable) through approval and monitoring;
-
(m) providing overall corporate governance of the Company, including conducting regular reviews of the balance of responsibilities within the Company to ensure division of functions remain appropriate to the needs of the Company;
-
(n) appointing the external auditor (where applicable, based on recommendations of the Audit Committee) and the appointment of a new external auditor when any vacancy arises, provided that any appointment made by the Board must be ratified by shareholders at the next annual general meeting of the Company;
-
(o) engaging with the Company’s external auditors and Audit Committee;
10
AusQuest Ltd Corporate governance statement
-
(p) monitoring compliance with all of the Company's legal obligations, such as those obligations relating to the environment, native title, cultural heritage and occupational health and safety; and
-
(q) make regular assessment of whether each non‐executive director is independent in accordance with the Company's Policy on Assessing the Independence of Directors .
The Managing Director is responsible for running the affairs of the Company under delegated authority from the Board and to implement the policies and strategy set by the Board. The Managing Director must also report to the Board in a timely manner on those matters included in the Company's risk profile, all relevant operational matters and any other material matter.
The functions and responsibilities of the Board compared with those delegated to management are reflective of the Recommendations.
The Managing Director is also responsible for appointing and, where appropriate, removing senior executives, including the chief financial officer and the company secretary, with the approval of the Board. The Managing Director is also responsible for evaluating the performance of senior executives.
Recommendation 1.2 – Disclose the process for evaluating the performance of senior executives.
The Remuneration Committee is charged with periodic review of the job description and performance of the Managing Director according to agreed performance parameters.
The Managing Director and senior executives were the subject of informal evaluations against both individual performance and overall business measures. These evaluations were undertaken progressively and periodically.
The Company’s website contains a section formally setting out the Company’s Process for Performance Evaluation.
Recommendation 1.3 – Provide the information in the guide to reporting on Recommendations.
The Company is not aware of any departure from Recommendations 1.1 or 1.2. Performance evaluations for senior executives have taken place in the reporting period in accordance with the process disclosed.
The board charter is publicly available at www.ausquest.com.au and it includes a description of what matters are reserved for the board or senior executives respectively.
PRINCIPLE 2: STRUCTURE THE BOARD TO ADD VALUE
Recommendation 2.1 – A majority of the Board should be independent directors.
The Company did not have a majority of independent directors during the year. As at the year end, two out of the five directors are independent, namely Mr. Ellis and Mr. Hancock. Mr. Drew is involved in the day to day running of the Company, Mr. Ashley was also involved in the day to day running of the Company prior to 5 April 2012 and Mr. Moulton is a full time employee of Cliffs Natural Resources Pty Ltd, a substantial shareholder of the Company.
The Board considers that its current composition is the most appropriate blend of skills and expertise, relevant to the Company's business and is appropriate given the Company's current size and operations. The Board is aware of the importance of independent judgement and considers independence, amongst other things, when new appointments to the Board are made.
Recommendation 2.2 – The chairperson should be an independent director.
Mr Hancock, the Chairman of the company is an independent director.
Recommendation 2.3 –The roles of chairperson and chief executive officer should not be exercised by the same individual.
The role of the Chairperson is filled by Mr Hancock (Independent non‐executive Director).
The role of the Managing Director and CEO is filled by Mr Drew.
11
AusQuest Ltd Corporate governance statement
Recommendation 2.4 – The Board should establish a nomination committee.
The full Board performs the function of the Nomination Committee. The Board considers that at this stage, no efficiencies or other benefits would be gained by establishing a separate nomination committee. One separate meeting was held during the year and attendance by the Board is recorded in the Directors’ Report. The Board has adopted a nomination committee charter to assist it to fulfil its function as the nomination committee and this is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 2.5 – Disclose the process for evaluating the performance of the Board, its committees and individual directors.
The Board is charged with Board and Board Committee membership, succession planning and performance evaluation, as well as Board member induction, education and development.
The Company has adopted policies and procedures concerning the evaluation and development of its directors, executives and Board committee. Procedures include an internal Board performance assessment, an induction protocol and ongoing discussions with regard to the performance of the Board and its directors.
The Company’s Process for Performance Evaluation is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 2.6 – Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 2.
Contained in the Directors’ Report section of this Annual Report are details of the skills, experience and expertise held by each Director in office at the date of this Annual Report.
The terms of office, and their status as executive/non‐executive/independent, for each director for the year ended 30 June 2012 were as follows (with all directors noted as continuing in office as at 30 June 2012 and still being in office at the date of this annual report unless indicated otherwise):
| Director | Status | Date of appointment |
|---|---|---|
| Greg Hancock | Non‐Executive/independent | appointed 16 September 2003 |
| Graeme Drew | Executive/ non‐independent | appointed 15 February 2000 |
| John Ashley | Non‐Executive/ non‐independent | appointed 15 February 2000 |
| Chris Ellis | Non‐Executive/ independent | appointed 2 November 2006 |
| Craig Moulton | Non‐Executive/non‐independent | appointed 9 August 2011 |
The Company has accepted the definition of “independence” in the Recommendations in making the above assessments of independence.
The Company’s Corporate Governance Charter empowers a director to take independent professional advice at the expense of the Company.
In accordance with the Process for Performance Evaluation, an evaluation of Board Performance took place during the year.
The Company strives to ensure that the mix of skills and diversity of the members of the Board adds to overall shareholder value and is representative of the core principles of the Company’s Diversity Policy.
The Company’s procedure for the selection and appointment of new directors is available on the Company’s website along with a copy of the Nomination Committee Charter.
P RINCIPLE 3: PROMOTE ETHICAL AND RESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKING
Recommendation 3.1: Establish a code of conduct and disclose the code, or a summary as to:
-
3.1.1 the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the company’s integrity;
-
3.1.2 the practices necessary to take into account legal obligations and reasonable expectations of stakeholders; and
-
3.1.3 the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices.
12
AusQuest Ltd Corporate governance statement
The Company has established a formal code of conduct to guide the Directors, the Managing Director and the CFO (or equivalent) with respect to the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the Company’s integrity, the practices necessary to take into account legal obligations and reasonable expectations of stakeholders, and the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices. The code of conduct is disclosed on the company’s website.
Recommendation 3.2: Companies should establish a policy concerning diversity and disclose the policy or a summary of that policy. The policy should include requirements for the board to establish measurable objectives for achieving diversity for the board to assess annually both the objectives and progress in achieving them.
The Company’s policy regarding diversity is set out on the Company’s website.
The Company’s diversity policy does not include measureable objectives as the Board believes that the Company will not be able to successfully meet these given the size and stage of development of the Company. If the Company’s activities increase in size, nature and scope in the future, then appropriate measureable objectives will be set and put into place.
Recommendation 3.3: Companies should disclose in each annual report the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the board in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving them.
Given the size of the Company the Directors do not consider it appropriate to set measurable objectives in relation to diversity. Notwithstanding this the Company strives to provide the best possible opportunities for current and prospective employees of all backgrounds in such a manner that best adds to overall shareholder value and which reflects the values, principles and spirit of the Company’s Diversity Policy.
Recommendation 3.4: Companies should disclose in each annual report the proportion of women employees in the whole organisation, women in senior executive positions and women on the board.
For the 2012 financial year, the Company had a total of 3 women employees out of a total of 17 employees and contractors, however the Company had no women in senior executive positions or women on the Board.
Recommendation 3.5: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 3. The Company is not aware of any departure from Recommendations 3.1 or 3.4.
The Company’s diversity policy does not include measureable objectives as the Board believes that the Company will not be able to successfully meet these given the size and stage of development of the Company.
The Company’s Code of Conduct and the Company’s diversity policy are publicly available on the Company’s website.
PRINCIPLE 4: SAFEGUARD INTEGRITY IN FINANCIAL REPORTING
Recommendation 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4: The Board should establish an Audit Committee.
The Board has established a separate Audit Committee comprising the two independent non‐executive directors, being Mr. Hancock and Mr Ellis and an additional non‐executive director, being Mr Moulton. The Committee met three times during the year and attendances by committee members are recorded in the Directors’ Report.
Mr Ellis, the Chair of the Audit Committee, is independent and not the Chair of the Board. He is an experienced mining executive with over 30 years experience in geology, exploration, mine planning and project development in Australia and overseas. Mr Hancock is also financially literate. All Audit Committee members have industry experience.
A copy of the Company’s Audit Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website. The Company’s process for the selection, appointment and rotation of the Company’s external auditors is also available on the Company’s website.
The Company is not aware of any departure from Recommendations 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 or 4.4.
PRINCIPLE 5: MAKE TIMELY AND BALANCED DISCLOSURE
Recommendation 5.1: Establish written policies designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at a senior executive level for that compliance and disclose those policies or a summary of them.
The Company has established written policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at senior executive level for that compliance.
13
AusQuest Ltd Corporate governance statement
Recommendation 5.2: Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 5.
The Company is not aware of any departure from Recommendations 5.1 or 5.2.
A summary of the Company’s policy on ASX Listing Rule Compliance is publicly available on the Company’s website.
PRINCIPLE 6: RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
Recommendation 6.1: Companies should design a communications policy for promoting effective communication with shareholders and encouraging their participation at general meetings and disclose their policy or a summary of that policy.
The Company has adopted policies formally setting out the Company’s communications strategy with its stakeholders including the effective use of electronic communications.
The board encourages the attendance of shareholders at the Shareholders’ Meetings and sets the time and place of each Shareholders Meeting to allow maximum attendance by shareholders.
Recommendation 6.2: Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 6.
Details of how the Company will communicate with its shareholders publicly is set out under the heading “Shareholder Communication Policy” which is publicly available on the Company’s website.
The Company is not aware of any departure from Recommendations 6.1 or 6.2.
PRINCIPLE 7: RECOGNISE AND MANAGE RISK
Recommendation 7.1: Companies should establish policies for the oversight and management of material business risks and disclose a summary of those policies.
The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing and approving policies for the management and oversight of material business risks, internal compliance and internal controls. The objectives of AusQuest’s risk management program are contained in the Risk Management Policy which is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 7.2: The Board to require management to design and implement the risk management and internal control system to manage the Company’s material business risks, and report to it on whether those risks are being managed effectively. Board to disclose that management has reported to it as to the effectiveness of the Company’s management of its material business risks.
The Company has in place a system of risk management that identifies and categorises and manages material business risks faced by the Company. A risk register is updated and tabled at appropriate Board meetings throughout the year. Key risks addressed include
-
Occupational Health and Safety;
-
Protection of assets;
-
Market risk;
-
Liquidity risk; and
-
Compliance risk.
The Board has delegated responsibility for establishing and maintaining effective management strategies for material business risk to the Managing Director and senior executives. The Board requires that the senior executive team report on at least a quarterly basis as to the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management systems.
The Board recognises that no cost effective internal control system will preclude all errors and irregularities. The system is based upon written procedures, policies and guidelines, an organisational structure that provides an appropriate division of responsibility, and the selection and training of qualified personnel.
The Board of Directors review the business and financial risk management systems and internal control systems implemented by management to obtain reasonable assurance that the entity’s assets are safeguarded and that the reliability and integrity of its financial information is maintained. The Board review, at least annually, the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management systems.
14
AusQuest Ltd Corporate governance statement
Recommendation 7.3: Board to disclose whether it has received assurance from the Managing Director (or equivalent) and the CFO (or equivalent) that the declaration provided in accordance with S.295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
The Company’s Managing Director and CFO (or equivalent) provided the Board assurance in compliance with this Recommendation that the declaration provided in accordance with S.295A of the Corporations Act was founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that system was operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
Recommendation 7.4: Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 7.
The Company is not aware of any departure from Recommendations 7.1, 7.2 or 7.3 although notes it is continuing to develop and refine its risk management and internal control processes.
A copy of the Company’s policies on risk oversight and management of material business risks is publicly available under the heading “Risk Management Policy”.
PRINCIPLE 8: REMUNERATE FAIRLY AND RESPONSIBLY
Recommendation 8.1: The Board should establish a remuneration committee.
The Board has established a Remuneration Committee comprising the independent directors and an additional director, being Mr Hancock, Mr Ellis and Mr Moulton. Two meetings were held during the year and attendance by committee members is recorded in the Directors’ Report.
Recommendation 8.2: The remuneration committee should be structured so that it:
-
consists of a majority of independent directors
-
is chaired by an independent chair
-
has at least three members.
The remuneration committee consists of a majority of independent directors, is chaired by an independent chair, namely Mr. Greg Hancock, and does have at least 3 members.
Recommendation 8.3: Clearly distinguish the structure of non‐executive directors’ remuneration from that of executive directors and senior executives.
The structure of non‐executive remuneration is clearly distinguishable from that of executive directors and senior executives.
The level of remuneration packages and policies applicable to directors are detailed in the Remuneration Report which forms part of the Directors’ Report to this Annual Report.
Recommendation 8.4: Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 8
Non‐ Executive Director Retirement Benefits
Non‐executive directors are entitled to statutory superannuation. There are no other schemes for retirement benefits for non‐executive directors.
Limiting Risk
Directors are prohibited from entering into transactions which limit the risk of participating in unvested entitlements under any equity based remuneration scheme.
Information Publicly Available
The Company’s website contains a section formally setting out the Remuneration Committee Charter which is used by the Board when considering matters relevant to a Remuneration Committee.
15
AusQuest Ltd Directors’ report
Directors’ report
The Directors of AusQuest Ltd herewith submit the annual financial report of the Company and the entities it controlled (“Group”) for the financial year ended 30 June 2012. In order to comply with the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001, the Directors report as follows:
Information about Directors and senior management
The names and particulars of the Directors of the Company during or since the end of the financial year and up to the date of this report are noted below. Except where indicated, directors have held office during and since the end of the financial year:
Greg Hancock BA Econs, BEd Hons.,F.Fin
Non‐Executive Director and Chairman
Greg has had over 20 years experience in capital markets practicing in the area of corporate finance. He maintains close links with the stockbroking and investment banking community on behalf of the Company.
Directorships held in listed companies over the last three years are as follows:
Cooper Energy Limited –March 2001 – October 2011
Graeme Drew B.Sc.Hons., FAIMM, MASEG
Managing Director
Graeme has over 40 years experience in the exploration industry in Australia and overseas. Prior to co‐founding AusQuest Ltd he was an Exploration Manager for CRAE and Rio Tinto Exploration Pty Ltd in Western Australia (9 years) and Eastern Australia (4 years). He has wide experience in the search for, and evaluation of, most base and precious metals (notably nickel, gold, uranium, zinc and diamonds). Graeme has developed a passion for the ‘big picture’ and ‘big project’ generation which he strongly believes are the building blocks for successful exploration outcomes. He has been involved in discoveries at Kintyre (uranium), Admiral Bay (lead/zinc), Honeymoon Well (nickel) plus gold deposits at Kirkalocka, Whistler and Ellen Dam.
Graeme has held no other Directorships in listed companies over the last three years.
John Ashley B.Sc.Hons.,M.Sc., FAIMM, MSEG, MASEG, MAIG
Non ‐Executive Director
John is a former Director of Southern Geoscience Consultants (SGC), which he established in 1985, and is a former Director of Aerodata Holdings and Conquest Mines NL (unlisted). John has over 4 decades experience as a geophysicist in the exploration industry with government agencies, exploration companies, and consulting companies and has worked in many countries. He has had significant involvement in discoveries of El Sherana West (uranium), Prieska (copper/lead/zinc), Red October, Ulysses (gold).
John has held no other Directorships in listed companies over the last three years.
Christopher Ellis BSc (Hons)
Non‐Executive Director
Chris is an experienced mining executive with over 30 years experience in geology, exploration, mine planning and project development in Australia and overseas. He was a founding member and Executive Director of Excel Coal Limited which was the subject of a take‐over bid by the US coal giant Peabody Energy Inc, and has held senior positions within Shell Coal’s Exploration, BP Coal (London and USA), Agipcoal Australia and the Stratford Joint Venture.
Chris has held no other Directorships in listed companies over the last three years.
Craig Moulton BSc (Hons )
Non‐Executive Director (appointed on 5 August 2011 and previously acted as alternate director for Mr. Ravenscroft from 8 February 2011)
Craig holds a Bachelor of Science (Geology) with Honours from the University of Western Australia and has over 18 years experience in the mining industry in Australia and overseas. He is currently General Manager Exploration Asia Pacific for Cliffs Natural Resources. Prior to Cliffs, Craig held senior mining, development and exploration roles in Rio Tinto Iron Ore, Fujitsu Australia and Rio Tinto Copper Projects.
Craig has held no other Directorships in listed companies over the last three years.
Peter Ravenscroft M.Sc;FAIMM
Non‐Executive Director (appointed as non‐executive director on 8 February 2011 and resigned on 5 August 2011)
16
AusQuest Ltd Directors’ report
Company secretary
Darren Crawte LL.B (Hons), ACA, CA, MAICD
Darren is a qualified chartered accountant in both the UK and Australia and has worked within public practice for over 14 years, initially as an external auditor. He is currently a Director of Audit and Corporate services at Nexia Perth, a mid tier accounting and business advisory practice, where he specialises in providing corporate advisory, financial accounting/audit management, transactional support, taxation and other back office services to junior listed companies. Darren has acted as Company Secretary to a number of companies in the junior resources sector having managed a number of these through an initial public offering.
Directors’ shareholdings
The following table sets out each Director’s relevant interest in shares, debentures, and rights or options in shares or debentures of the Company or a related body corporate as at the date of this report.
| Directors | Fully paid ordinary shares Number |
Share options Number |
|---|---|---|
| Greg Hancock 1,058,000 ‐ Chris Ellis 10,668,658 ‐ John Ashley 6,071,630 ‐ Graeme Drew 4,747,241 1,000,000 Craig Moulton (i) ‐ ‐ |
- (i) Mr. Craig Moulton is a full time employee of Cliffs Natural Resources Pty Ltd (“Cliffs”). Cliffs hold 68,308,791 shares but Mr Moulton does not hold shares or options independently.
Remuneration of Directors and senior management
Information about the remuneration of Directors and senior management is set out in the Remuneration Report of this Directors’ report.
Share options granted to Directors and senior management
During and since the end of the financial year there were no share options were granted to Key Management Personnel of the Group as part of their remuneration.
Principal activities
The principal activity of the Group was mineral exploration throughout Australia, Africa and Peru.
Review of operations
A review of the Group’s exploration projects and activities during the year are discussed in the Exploration Report included in this Annual Report.
The loss of the Group after income tax and after allocation to non‐controlling interests for the year was $9,053,588 (2011: $10,487,100).
Changes in state of affairs
During the financial year there was no significant change in the state of affairs of the Group other than as referred to in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Subsequent events
There has been no matters or circumstance, other than that referred to in the financial statements or notes thereto, that has arisen since the end of the financial year, that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect, the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
Future developments
Disclosure of information regarding the likely developments in the operations of the Group in future financial years and the expected results of those operations is likely to result in unreasonable prejudice to the Group. Accordingly, this information has not been disclosed in this report.
17
AusQuest Ltd Directors’ report
Safety and environmental regulations
The Company is aware of its occupational health and safety and environmental obligations with regard to its exploration activities and ensures that it complies with all regulations when carrying out exploration work.
Dividends
No dividends were paid or declared since the start of the financial year. No recommendation for the payment of dividends has been made.
Share options
Shares under option or issued on exercise of options
Details of unissued shares or interests under option as at the date of this report are:
| Issuing entity | Number of shares under option |
Class of shares |
Exercise price of option |
Expiry date of options |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AusQuest Ltd 1,250,000 Ordinary 35 cents each 31 December 2012 AusQuest Ltd 500,000 Ordinary 30 cents each 30 November 2013 AusQuest Ltd 2,250,000 Ordinary 40 cents each 30 November 2013 AusQuest Ltd 1,350,000 Ordinary 20 cents each 1 December 2013 AusQuest Ltd 1,150,000 Ordinary 40 cents each 1 December 2013 |
The holders of such options do not have the right, by virtue of the option, to participate in any share or other interest issue of any other body corporate or registered scheme.
Shares issued on the exercise of options
No shares were issued during the year on the exercise of options.
Share options that expired/lapsed
Details of share options that expired or lapsed during or since the end of the financial year are:
| Issuing entity | Number of options expired/lapsed |
Class of shares |
Exercise price of option |
Expiry date of options |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AusQuest Ltd 500,000 Ordinary 30 cents each 31 January 2012 |
Indemnification of officers and auditors
During or since the end of the financial year the Company has given an indemnity or entered into an agreement to indemnify, or paid or agreed to pay insurance premiums as follows:
- except as may be prohibited by the Corporations Act 2001 a Director or officer of the Company shall be indemnified out of the property of the Company against any liability incurred by him in his capacity as Director or officer of the Company or any related corporation in respect of any act or omission whatsoever and howsoever occurring or in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal.
Since the beginning of the financial year the Company has paid insurance premiums of $38,571 in respect of Directors and Officers liability and corporate reimbursement, for Directors and officers in the Company. The insurance premiums relate to:
-
any loss for which the Directors and officers may not be legally indemnified by the Company arising out of any claim, by reason of any wrongful act committed by them in their capacity as a Director or officer of the Company or any related corporation, first made against them jointly or severally during the year of insurance; and
-
indemnifying the Company against any payment which it has made and was legally permitted to make arising out of any claim, by reason of any wrongful act, committed by any Director or officer in their capacity as a Director or officer of the Company or any related corporation, first made against the Director or officer during the period of insurance.
18
AusQuest Ltd Directors’ report
Directors’ meetings
The following table sets out the number of Directors’ meetings (including meetings of committees of Directors) held during the financial year and the number of meetings attended by each Director (while they were a Director or committee member).
During the financial year, 7 board meetings, 3 audit committee meetings, and 2 remuneration committee meetings were held.
| Board of Directors | Board of Directors | Remuneration committee | Remuneration committee | Audit committee | Audit committee | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directors | Eligible to attend |
Attended | Eligible to attend |
Attended | Eligible to attend |
Attended |
| Greg Hancock 7 7 2 2 3 3 Christopher Ellis 7 7 2 2 3 3 John Ashley 7 7 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Graeme Drew 7 7 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Craig Moulton 6 6 2 2 3 3 Peter Ravenscroft 1 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ |
In addition 5 circular resolutions have been passed by Directors during the year.
Proceedings on behalf of the Company
No persons have applied for leave pursuant to s.237 of the Corporation Act 2001 to bring, or intervene in, proceedings on behalf of AusQuest Ltd.
Non‐audit services
There were no non‐audit services performed during the year by the auditors (or by another person or firm on the auditors’ behalf).
Auditor’s independence declaration
Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 requires our auditors, HLB Mann Judd, to provide the directors of the Company with an independence declaration in relation to the audit of the annual report. This independence declaration is included on page 22 of the financial report and forms part of this directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2012.
Remuneration report
This remuneration report, which forms part of the Directors’ report, sets out information about the remuneration of AusQuest Ltd’s key management personnel for the financial year ended 30 June 2012. Disclosures required under AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures have been transferred from the financial report and have been audited. The additional disclosures required by the Corporations Act 2001 and the Corporations Regulations 2001 have not been audited.
The prescribed details for each person covered by this report are detailed below under the following headings:
-
key management personnel details;
-
remuneration policy and relationship between the remuneration policy and Company performance;
-
remuneration of key management personnel; and
-
key terms of employment contracts.
Key management personnel details
The key management personnel of AusQuest Ltd during the year or since the end of the year were:
Greg Hancock Non‐Executive Chairman Graeme Drew Managing Director John Ashley Executive Director (1 July 2011 to 4 April 2012) Non‐Executive Director (5 April 2012 to 30 June 2012) Christopher Ellis Non‐Executive Director Craig Moulton Non‐Executive Director (appointed on 9 August 2011) Peter Ravenscroft Non ‐Executive Director (resigned on 5 August 2011) Darren Crawte Company Secretary
There were no group executives employed by AusQuest Ltd during the year.
19
AusQuest Ltd Directors’ report
Remuneration policy and relationship between the remuneration policy and Company performance
The Board policy for determining emoluments is based on the principle of remunerating Directors and senior executives on their ability to add value to the Company (taking into account the Company’s strategic plan and operations) whilst also considering market emolument packages for similar positions within the industry and in consultation with external consultants. The Board appreciates the interrelationship between this policy and Company performance. It acknowledges that it is in the best interests of shareholders to provide challenging but achievable incentives to reward senior executives for reaching the Company’s stated goals. The Board will discuss these issues internally and with candidates prior to engaging additional Directors or senior executives in the future.
‐ Key management personnel (excluding non executive Directors)
The Remuneration Committee is responsible for determining the remuneration policies for the Group, including those affecting executive Directors and other key management personnel. The Committee may seek appropriate external advice to assist in its decision making. Remuneration policies and practices are directed primarily at attracting, motivating and retaining key management personnel.
The remuneration policy for executive Directors and other key management personnel has the following key elements:
-
Primary benefits (being salary, fees, bonus and non monetary benefits)
-
Post‐employment benefits (being superannuation)
-
Equity (being share options granted at the discretion of the Board)
-
Other benefits
Executive directors are also entitled to receive a cash bonus under the Executive Short Term Incentive Plan. The Plan, which was adopted by the Board on 17 December 2009, provides that executive directors may receive a cash bonus dependant on the achievement of a number of quantitative objectives aligned to exploration success, identification of new opportunities and implementation of those new opportunities. Approximately 85% of the bonus is aligned to the achievement of these objectives and the remaining 15% is aligned to qualitative goals in areas such as governance, funding and external relationships. The quantum of the bonus is defined as a percentage of annual salary and allows for a payment of between 15% and 50%, depending on whether goals are achieved on a threshold, target or stretch basis. The bonus is payable on a financial year basis.
In September 2011, the Remuneration Committee approved the payment of cash bonuses to the participants of the plan for the 2011 financial year, based on the assessment of the performance of the participants in the various qualitative and quantitative fields as discussed above. These were paid in full during the current financial year. The awards for the 2012 financial year will be considered and approved in the 2013 financial year and shown as part of remuneration once approved and granted.
Non‐executive Directors
The Company’s non‐executive Directors receive only fees (including statutory superannuation) for their services and the reimbursement of reasonable expenses. The fees paid to the Company’s non‐executive Directors reflect the demands on, and responsibilities of these Directors. They do not receive any retirement benefits (other than compulsory superannuation). The Board decides annually the level of fees to be paid to non‐Executive Directors with reference to market standards.
Non ‐Executive Directors may also receive share options where this is considered appropriate by the Board as a whole and with regard to the stage of the Company’s development. Such options vest across the life of the option and are primarily designed to provide an incentive to non‐Executive Directors to remain with the Company.
A non‐Executive Directors’ fee pool limit of $300,000 per annum was approved by the shareholders at the Annual General Meeting on 18 November 2008 and is currently utilised to a level of $135,000 excluding superannuation per annum. The fees currently paid to non‐Executive Directors are $55,000 excluding superannuation per annum for the non‐Executive Chairman and $40,000 excluding superannuation per annum for the non‐Executive Directors.
20
AusQuest Ltd Directors’ report
Remuneration of key management personnel
| Short‐term employee benefits | Short‐term employee benefits | Short‐term employee benefits | Short‐term employee benefits | Post‐ employ‐ ment benefits |
Other long‐ term |
Share‐ based payment |
% of comensati |
Performance Related |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary & fees |
Bonus | Non‐ monetary |
Super‐ | employee |
p on consists |
|||||
| Other | annuation | benefits |
Options | Total | of options | |||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | % | % | |
| 2012 Directors Graeme Drew John Ashley Greg Hancock(i) Chris Ellis Craig Moulton (ii) Peter Ravenscroft 2011 Directors Graeme Drew John Ashley Greg Hancock(i) Chris Ellis Richard Mehan Peter Ravenscroft Craig Moulton(ii) |
247,706 67,500 ‐ 7,710 22,294 72,360 58,185 ‐ 7,710 ‐ 100,000 ‐ ‐ 7,710 4,950 40,000 ‐ ‐ 7,710 3,600 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,886 ‐ 4,308 ‐ ‐ 845 ‐ |
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ |
‐ 345,210 ‐ 19.6% ‐ 138,255 ‐ 42.1% ‐ 112,660 ‐ ‐ ‐ 51,310 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,886 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,153 ‐ ‐ |
|||||||
| 464,374 125,685 ‐ 38,571 30,844 |
‐ | 659,474 ‐ ‐ |
||||||||
| 234,730 45,500 ‐ 7,764 25,221 130,718 39,680 ‐ 7,764 ‐ 55,000 ‐ ‐ 7,764 4,950 40,000 ‐ ‐ 7,764 3,600 24,154 ‐ ‐ 4,744 2,174 14,405 ‐ ‐ 3,021 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ |
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ |
111,503 424,718 26.2% 10.7% ‐ 178,162 ‐ 22.3% ‐ 67,714 ‐ ‐ ‐ 51,364 ‐ ‐ ‐ 31,072 ‐ ‐ ‐ 17,426 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ |
||||||||
| 499,007 85,180 ‐ 38,821 35,945 |
‐ | 111,503 770,456 ‐ ‐ |
(i) During the year, additional consulting services to the value of $45,000 (2011: nil) were provided by Mr Hancock. In the previous year, these consulting services were provided by Hancock Corporate Investments Pty Ltd.
(ii) The Company does not pay any director’s fees to Craig Moulton as he is a full‐time employee of Cliffs Natural Resources, a substantial shareholder of AusQuest Ltd.
During the year no options were issued to key management personnel.
No options granted as remuneration were exercised by key management personnel during the year.
There were no options granted as remuneration to key management personnel which were granted, exercised or lapsed during the year.
Key terms of employment contracts
Remuneration and other terms of employment for the Managing Director, Graeme Drew are formalised in a service agreement. Major provisions of this agreement are set out below:
-
Term of agreement – two years commencing 25 November 2011.
-
Base salary reviewed annually, currently $270,000 per annum (inclusive of superannuation entitlements).
-
Entitlement to participate in Short Term Incentive Plan comprising a cash bonus dependent on the achievement of predetermined quantitative and qualitative objectives.
-
Payment of termination benefit on early termination by the employer, other than for gross misconduct, equals 3 months salary, other than if there is a change of control of the Company, which will result in 12 months salary.
-
Notice period of 90 days.
This Directors’ report is signed in accordance with a resolution of Directors made pursuant to s.298(2) of the Corporations Act 2001.
On behalf of the Directors
==> picture [61 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
Graeme Drew Managing Director Perth, 19 September 2012
21
==> picture [159 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
As lead auditor for the audit of the financial report of AusQuest Limited for the year ended 30 June 2012, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of:
-
a) the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
-
b) any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
This declaration is in respect of AusQuest Limited.
==> picture [166 x 54] intentionally omitted <==
Perth, Western Australia 19 September 2012
W M CLARK Partner, HLB Mann Judd
==> picture [16 x 14] intentionally omitted <==
HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) ABN 22 193 232 714 Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000. PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. Email: [email protected]. Website: http://www.hlb.com.au Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of
International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers.
22
==> picture [164 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the members of AusQuest Limited
Report on the Financial Report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of AusQuest Limited (“the company”), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2012, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration for the consolidated entity. The consolidated entity comprises the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.
Directors’ responsibility for the financial report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In Note 2, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101: Presentation of Financial Statements , that the consolidated financial report complies with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by directors or
management.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 .
HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) ABN 22 193 232 714 Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000. PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. Email: [email protected]. Website: http://www.hlb.com.au Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers.
23
==> picture [33 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [51 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [52 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [31 x 71] intentionally omitted <==
Matters relating to the electronic presentation of the audited financial report and remuneration report
This auditor’s repor t relates to t he financial report and r emuneratio n report of A usQuest Li m ited for the fina n cial year e n ded 30 Jun e 2012 publi s hed in the a nnual repo r t and includ e d on the c o mpany’s website. The company’s direct o rs are res p onsible for the integrit y of the co m pany’s website. We have n o t been eng a ged to rep o rt on the in t egrity of thi s website. The auditor’s report refer s only to the financial report a nd remune r ation report. It does not provide an opinion on a ny other inf o rmation which m ay have b e en hyperlin k ed to/from t he financial report and remuneration report. If users of the fin a ncial report and remu n eration rep o rt are con c erned with the inhere n t risks aris i ng from publica t ion on a we b site, they a r e advised t o refer to the hard copy o f the audite d financial r e port and remuneration report to confirm t h e informati o n containe d in this web s ite version o f the financ i al report and re m uneration r e port.
Auditor’s opinion
In our opinion:
-
(a ) the financial report of A usQuest Li m ited is in a c cordance with the Corp o rations Act 2 001 , including:
-
(i) giving a true and f a ir view of the consolidated entity’s fi n ancial posi t ion as at 30 June 2012 a nd of its pe r formance for the year e n ded on that date; and
-
(ii) compl y ing with Au s tralian Acc o unting Stan d ards and t h e Corporati o ns Regulati o ns 2001 ; and
-
(b ) the financial report als o complies w ith Internati o nal Financi a l Reporting Standards a s disclosed i n Note 2.
Report on the Remuneration Report
We ha v e audited th e remuneration report in c luded in th e directors’ r e port for the year ended 30 June 2012. The directo r s of the company are responsible for the pre p aration and presentati o n of the remuneration report in accorda n ce with section 300A of t he Corpora t ions Act 20 0 1 . Our resp o nsibility is to e x press an o p inion on th e remuneration report, based on ou r audit conducted in ac c ordance with Au s tralian Auditing Standa r ds.
Auditor’s opinion
In our opinion the remunerati o n report of AusQuest Limited for the year e n ded 30 Ju n e 2012 compli e s with secti o n 300A of t h e Corporati o ns Act 200 1 .
==> picture [6 x 42] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [51 x 42] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [52 x 42] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [42 x 42] intentionally omitted <==
HLB MANN JUDD Chartered Accountants
==> picture [5 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [51 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [52 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [7 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
W M CLARK Partner
Perth, Western Australia 19 September 2012
24
AusQuest Ltd Directors’ declaration
Directors’ declaration
The directors declare that:
-
a. the financial statements, notes and the additional disclosures of the Group are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 including:
-
i. giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2012 and of its performance for the year then ended; and
-
ii. complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
-
b. there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
-
c. note 2 confirms that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in accordance with Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2012.
This declaration is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.
On behalf of the Directors
==> picture [60 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
Graeme Drew Managing Director
Perth, 19 September 2012
25
AusQuest Ltd Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
| Continuing operations Revenue Consultants and employee benefits expense Occupancy expenses Administration expense Exploration expenditure expensed as incurred Impairment of exploration expenditure Loss before income tax expense Income tax expense Loss for the year Other comprehensive income: Exchange gain/(loss) on translation of foreign operations Total comprehensive loss for the year Loss for the year attributable to owners of the parent Profit/(loss) for the year attributable to non‐controlling interests Total comprehensive loss attributable to owners of the parent Total comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to non‐controlling interests Loss per share: Basic (cents per share) |
Note 5 11 7 6 16 |
2012 $ 2011 $ |
|---|---|---|
| 450,776 4,693,672 |
||
| (368,697) (679,985) (109,174) (127,542) (1,040,028) (1,555,850) (71,043) (682,363) (7,909,791) (12,141,108) |
||
| (9,047,957) (10,493,176) ‐ ‐ |
||
| (9,047,957) (10,493,176) 342,905 (23,104) |
||
| (8,705,052) (10,516,280) |
||
| (9,053,588) (10,487,100) 5,631 (6,076) |
||
| (9,047,957) (10,493,176) |
||
| (8,761,903) (10,510,204) 56,851 (6,076) |
||
| (8,705,052) (10,516,280) |
||
| 3.97 4.59 |
Notes to the financial statements are included on pages 30 to 51.
26
AusQuest Ltd Consolidated statement of financial position
Consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2012
| Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Other assets Total current assets Non‐current assets Other receivables Property, plant and equipment Exploration and evaluation expenditure Total non‐current assets Total assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables Provisions Total current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity Issued capital Reserves Accumulated losses Parent entity interest Non controlling interests Total equity |
Note 20 8 9 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 |
2012 $ 2011 $ |
|---|---|---|
| 5,076,798 11,434,507 1,272,405 2,073,276 75,350 91,267 |
||
| 6,424,553 13,599,050 |
||
| ‐ 750,000 102,456 127,705 17,071,623 19,267,933 |
||
| 17,174,079 20,145,638 |
||
| 23,598,632 33,744,688 |
||
| 823,728 2,265,695 82,148 81,185 |
||
| 905,876 2,346,880 |
||
| 905,876 2,346,880 |
||
| 22,692,756 31,397,808 |
||
| 52,307,672 52,307,672 1,061,634 278,944 (30,676,550) (22,817,119) |
||
| 22,692,756 29,769,497 ‐ 1,628,311 |
||
| 22,692,756 31,397,808 |
Notes to the financial statements are included on pages 30 to 51.
27
AusQuest Ltd Consolidated statement of changes in equity
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
| Balance at 1 July 2011 Profit/(Loss) for the year Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year Lapsed options during the year Adjustment to reflect change of non‐controlling interest in subsidiary Elimination of non controlling interests Balance at 30 June 2012 Balance at 1 July 2010 Loss for the year Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Total comprehensive loss for the year Recognition of share‐ based payments Lapsed options during the year Adjustment to reflect change of non‐controlling interest in subsidiary Balance at 30 June 2011 |
Issued Capital $ Share based payments reserve $ Foreign currency translation reserve $ Non controlling contribution reserve $ Accumulated losses $ Non controlling interests $ Total $ |
|---|---|
| 52,307,672 847,395 8,554 (577,005) (22,817,119) 1,628,311 31,397,808 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (9,053,588) 5,631 (9,047,957) ‐ ‐ 291,685 ‐ ‐ 51,220 342,905 |
|
| ‐ ‐ 291,685 ‐ (9,053,588) 56,851 (8,705,052) ‐ (86,000) ‐ ‐ 86,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,685,162 ‐ (1,685,162) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,108,157) 1,108,157 ‐ ‐ |
|
| 52,307,672 761,395 300,239 ‐ (30,676,550) ‐ 22,692,756 |
|
| 52,307,672 1,048,976 31,658 ‐ (12,796,815) 1,057,382 41,648,873 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (10,487,100) (6,076) (10,493,176) ‐ ‐ (23,104) ‐ ‐ ‐ (23,104) |
|
| ‐ ‐ (23,104) ‐ (10,487,100) (6,076) (10,516,280) ‐ 265,215 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 265,215 ‐ (466,796) ‐ ‐ 466,796 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (577,005) ‐ 577,005 ‐ |
|
| 52,307,672 847,395 8,554 (577,005) (22,817,119) 1,628,311 31,397,808 |
Notes to the financial statements are included on pages 30 to 51.
28
AusQuest Ltd Consolidated statement of cash flows
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
| Cash flows from operating activities Payments to suppliers and employees Interest received Net cash used in operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Payment for property, plant and equipment Exploration and evaluation expenditure Proceeds from disposal of exploration and evaluation assets Net cash used in investing activities Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year |
Note 20 (b) 20(a) |
Consolidated 2012 $ Consolidated 2011 $ |
|---|---|---|
| (1,136,637) (3,770,916) 594,690 984,690 |
||
| (541,947) (2,786,226) |
||
| (32,021) (38,275) (6,908,741) (8,667,501) 1,125,000 3,875,000 |
||
| (5,815,762) (4,830,776) |
||
| (6,357,709) (7,617,002) 11,434,507 19,051,509 |
||
| 5,076,798 11,434,507 |
Notes to the financial statements are included on pages 30 to 51.
29
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
1. General information
AusQuest Limited (the Company) is a public Company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (trading under the symbol (“AQD”), incorporated in Australia and operating in Australia and Africa.
The Company’s registered office and its principal place of business are as follows:
Registered office Principal place of business C/‐Nexia Perth Pty Ltd 8 Kearns Crescent Level 7, The Quadrant, 1 William Street ARDROSS WA 6153 PERTH WA 6000
The Group’s principal activities are the exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in Australia, Africa and Peru.
2. Significant accounting policies
Statement of compliance
The financial report is a general purpose financial report which has been prepared in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and Interpretations, and complies with other requirements of the law.
Accounting Standards include Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (‘A‐IFRS’). Compliance with A‐IFRS ensures that the financial statements and notes of the Company and the Group comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’).
The financial statements were authorised for issue by the Directors on 19 September 2012.
Basis of preparation
The financial report has been prepared on the basis of historical cost, except for the revaluation of certain non‐current assets and financial instruments. Cost is based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for assets. All amounts are presented in Australian dollars, unless otherwise noted.
Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty
In the application of the Group’s accounting policies, management is required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experiences and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to the accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects the current and future periods.
Refer to Note 3 for a discussion of critical judgements in applying the Group’s accounting policies and key sources of estimation uncertainty.
Adoption of new and revised Accounting Standards
Changes in accounting policy on initial application of Accounting Standards
In the year ended 30 June 2012, the Group has reviewed all of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations issued by the AASB that are relevant to its operations and effective for the current reporting period.
Standards and Interpretations affecting the reported results or financial position
There are no new and revised Standards and Interpretations adopted in these financial statements affecting the reported results or financial position.
Standards and Interpretations adopted with no effect on the financial statements
It has been determined by the Directors that there is no material impact of any other new and revised Standards and Interpretations on its business, and therefore, no change is necessary to Group accounting policies.
The Group has also reviewed all new Standards and Interpretations that have been issued but are not yet effective for the year ended 30 June 2012. The Directors anticipate that the adoption of these Standards and Interpretations in future periods will have no material financial impact on the financial statements of the Group. These Standards and Interpretations will be first applied in the financial report of the Group that relates to the annual reporting period beginning after the effective date of each pronouncement.
30
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
2. Significant accounting policies (contd)
The following significant accounting policies have been adopted in the preparation and presentation of the financial report:
(a) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and entities (including special purpose entities) controlled by the Company (its subsidiaries) referred to as ‘the Group’ in these financial statements.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra‐group transactions have been eliminated in full.
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Group. Control exists where the company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing when the Group controls another entity.
Business combinations have been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary comprises the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the Group. The consideration transferred also includes the fair value of any contingent consideration arrangement and the fair value of any pre‐existing equity interest in the subsidiary. Acquisition‐related costs are expenses as incurred. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are, with limited exceptions, measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. On an acquisition‐by‐acquisition basis, the Group recognises any non‐controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the non‐controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s net identifiable assets.
Unrealised gains or transactions between the Group and its associates are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interests in the associates. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Non‐controlling interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets in subsidiaries not held by the Group and are presented separately in the statement of comprehensive income and within equity in the consolidated statement of financial position. Losses are attributed to the non‐controlling interests even if that results in a deficit balance.
The Group treats transactions with non‐controlling interests that do not result in a loss of control as transactions with equity owners of the Group. A change in ownership interest results in an adjustment between the carrying amounts of the controlling and non‐controlling interests to reflect their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between the amount of the adjustment to non‐controlling interests and any consideration paid or received is recognised within equity attributable to owners of AusQuest Limited.
(b) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand; cash in banks and investments in money market instruments, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
(c) Employee benefits
A liability is recognised for benefits accruing to employees in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave and long service leave when it is probable that settlement will be required and they are capable of being measured reliably.
Liabilities recognised in respect of employee benefits expected to be settled within 12 months, are measured at their nominal values using the remuneration rate expected to apply at the time of settlement.
Liabilities recognised in respect of employee benefits which are not expected to be settled within 12 months are measured as the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made by the entity in respect of services provided by employees up to reporting date.
31
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
2. Significant accounting policies (contd)
(d) Financial assets
Financial assets are classified into the following specified categories: financial assets ‘at fair value through profit or loss’, ‘held‐to‐maturity investments’, ‘available‐for‐sale’ financial assets, and ‘loans and receivables’. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition.
Investments in subsidiaries are recognised and derecognised on trade date where purchase or sale of an investment is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the investment within the timeframe established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at cost price, net of transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, investments in subsidiaries are measured at cost.
Trade receivables, loans, and other receivables are recorded at amortised cost less impairment.
(e) Financial instruments issued by the Company
Debt and equity instruments
Debt and equity instruments are classified as either liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement.
Transaction costs on the issue of equity instruments
Transaction costs arising on the issue of equity instruments are recognised directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds of the equity instruments to which the costs relate. Transaction costs are the costs that are incurred directly in connection with the issue of those equity instruments and which would not have been incurred had those instruments not been issued.
(f) Goods and services tax
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST), except:
-
(i) where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the taxation authority, it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of an asset or as part of an item of expense; or
-
(ii) for receivables and payables which are recognised inclusive of GST.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables.
Cash flows are included in the statement of cash flows on a gross basis. The GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is classified as operating cash flows.
(g) Impairment of assets
- At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash‐generating unit to which the asset belongs.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre‐tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash‐generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash‐generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at fair value, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.
32
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
2. Significant accounting policies (contd)
(g) Impairment of assets (contd)
Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (cash‐generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (cash‐generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately, unless the relevant asset is carried at fair value, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.
(h) Income tax
Current tax
Current tax is calculated by reference to the amount of income taxes payable or recoverable in respect of the taxable profit or tax loss for the period. It is calculated using tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by reporting date. Current tax for current and prior periods is recognised as a liability (or asset) to the extent that it is unpaid (or refundable).
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided on all temporary differences arising from differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax base of those items.
In principle, deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that sufficient taxable amounts will be available against which deductible temporary differences or unused tax losses and tax offsets can be utilised. However, deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary differences giving rise to them arise from the initial recognition of assets and liabilities (other than as a result of a business
combination) which affects neither taxable income nor accounting profit. Furthermore, a deferred tax liability is not recognised in relation to taxable temporary differences arising from goodwill.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, branches, associates and joint ventures except where the entity is able to control the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences associated with these investments and interests are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that there will be sufficient taxable profits against which to utilise the benefits of the temporary differences and they are expected to reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period(s) when the asset and liability giving rise to them are realised or settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by reporting date. The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the entity expects, at the reporting date, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the entity intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
Current and deferred tax for the period
Current and deferred tax is recognised as an expense or income in the statement of comprehensive income, except when it relates to items credited or debited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognised directly in equity, or where it arises from the initial accounting for a business combination, in which case it is taken into account in the determination of goodwill or excess.
Tax consolidation
The Company and its wholly‐owned Australian resident entity are part of a tax‐consolidated group under Australian taxation law. AusQuest Ltd is the head entity in the tax‐consolidated group. Tax expense/income, deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences of the members of the tax‐consolidated group are recognised in the separate financial statements of the members of the tax‐consolidated group using the ‘separate taxpayer within group’ approach. Current tax liabilities and assets and deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and tax credits of the members of the tax‐consolidated group are recognised by the Company (as head entity in the tax‐consolidated group).
Amounts are recognised as payable to or receivable by the Company and each member of the Group in relation to the tax contribution amounts paid or payable between the parent entity and the other members of the tax‐consolidated Group as and when they arise.
33
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
2. Significant accounting policies (contd)
(i) Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure
Exploration, evaluation and development expenditure incurred may be accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest. These costs are carried forward only if they relate to an area of interest for which rights of tenure are current and in respect of which:
-
(i) such costs are expected to be recouped through successful development and exploitation or from sale of the area; or
-
(ii) exploration and evaluation activities in the area have not, at balance date, reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves, and active operations in, or relating to, the area are continuing.
Accumulated costs in respect of areas of interest which are abandoned are written off in full against profit or loss in the year in which the decision to abandon the area is made. A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest.
Notwithstanding the fact that a decision not to abandon an area of interest has been made, based on the above, the exploration and evaluation expenditure in relation to an area may still be written off if considered appropriate to do so.
(j) Joint ventures
Jointly controlled assets and operations
Interests in jointly controlled assets and operations are reported in the financial statements by including the entity’s share of assets employed in the joint ventures, the share of liabilities incurred in relation to the joint ventures and the share of any expenses incurred in relation to the joint ventures in their respective classification categories.
Jointly controlled entities
Interests in jointly controlled entities are accounted for under the equity method in the consolidated financial statements and the cost method in the Company’s financial statements.
(k) Operating cycle
The operating cycle of the entity coincides with the annual reporting cycle.
(l) Payables
Trade payables and other accounts payable are recognised when the entity becomes obliged to make future payments resulting from the purchase of goods and services.
(m) Foreign currency translation
Both the functional and presentation currency of AusQuest Limited and its Australian subsidiaries is Australian dollars. Each entity in the Group determines its own functional currency and items included in the financial statements of each entity are measured using that functional currency.
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency by applying the exchange rates ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance date.
All exchange differences in the consolidated financial report are taken to profit or loss with the exception of differences on foreign currency borrowings that provide a hedge against a net investment in a foreign entity. These are taken directly to equity until the disposal of the net investment, at which time they are recognised in profit or loss.
Tax charges and credits attributable to exchange differences on those borrowings are also recognised in equity.
Non‐monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate as at the date of the initial transaction.
Non‐monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined.
The functional currency of the foreign operations, E&A Resources Pty Ltd , Comoe Exploration SARL and Questdor SAC is United States dollars (US$). As at the balance date the assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated into the presentation currency of AusQuest Limited at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance date and their statements of comprehensive income are translated at the weighted average exchange rate for the year.
34
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
2. Significant accounting policies (contd)
(m) Foreign currency translation (contd)
The exchange differences arising on the translation are taken directly to the foreign currency translation reserve in equity.
On disposal of a foreign entity, the deferred cumulative amount recognised in equity relating to that particular foreign operation is recognised in profit or loss.
(n) Plant and equipment
Plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the item.
Depreciation is provided on plant and equipment. Depreciation is calculated on a diminishing value basis so as to write off the net cost or other revalued amount of each asset over its expected useful life to its estimated residual value. The estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation method is reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period.
The following estimated useful lives are used in the calculation of depreciation:
| Class of fixed asset | Depreciation rate (%) |
|---|---|
| Office furniture & equipment | 7.5 – 50.0 |
(o) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, the future sacrifice of economic benefits is probable, and the amount of the provision can be measured reliably.
The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at reporting date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. Where a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows.
When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, the receivable is recognised as an asset if it is virtually certain that recovery will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably.
(p) Revenue recognition
Interest revenue
Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis that takes into account the effective yield on the financial asset.
(q) Share‐based payments
The Group provides benefits to employees (including senior executives) of the Group in the form of share‐based payments. The cost of these share‐based payments is measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value at grant date is measured by use of the Black and Scholes option pricing model. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non‐transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.
The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity‐settled share‐based payments is expensed on a straight‐line basis over the vesting period, based on the entity’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest.
For cash‐settled share‐based payments, a liability equal to the portion of the goods or services received is recognised at the current fair value determined at each reporting date.
(r) Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net profit/loss attributable to members of the parent, adjusted to exclude any costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
35
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
2. Significant accounting policies (contd)
(r) Earnings per share (contd)
Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net profit/loss attributable to members of the parent, adjusted for:
-
costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends;
-
the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have been recognised as expenses; and
-
other non‐discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of potential ordinary shares; divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
(s) Operating segments
An operating segment is a component of an entity that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same entity), whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity's chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance and for which discrete financial information is available. This includes start up operations which are yet to earn revenues. Management also considers other factors in determining operating segments such as the existence of a line manager and the level of segment information presented to the board of directors.
Operating segments have been identified based on the information provided to the chief operating decision maker – being the board of directors.
The Group aggregates two or more operating segments when they have similar economic characteristics, and the segments are similar in the nature of the minerals targeted.
Operating segments that meet the quantitative criteria as prescribed by AASB 8 Operating Segments are reported separately. However, an operating segment that does not meet the quantitative criteria is still reported separately where information about the segment would be useful to users of the financial statements.
Information about other business activities and operating segments that are below the quantitative criteria are combined and disclosed in a separate category for “all other segments”.
3. Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty
Judgements made by management in the application of A‐IFRS that have significant effects on the financial statements and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustments in the next year are disclosed, where applicable, in the relevant note to the financial statements.
The following are the key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the balance date, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year:
Impairment
The Group assesses impairment at each reporting date by evaluating conditions specific to the Group that may lead to impairment of assets. Where an impairment trigger exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is determined. Other than exploration expenditure written off totalling $7,909,791 (2011: $12,141,108) during the year, no impairment loss was recorded in the current financial year (2011: nil).
Share based payments
The Group measures the cost of equity settled transactions with consultants and employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined using a Black & Scholes model using various assumptions.
Loans to controlled entities
The Directors believe that the recoupment of the inter‐company receivables from AusQuest Ltd to E&A Resources Pty Ltd and Questdor SAC is dependent on the successful development and commercial exploitation or, alternatively, the sale of the exploration assets held by the controlled entities.
36
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
4. Segment information
AASB 8 requires a ‘management approach’ under which segment information is presented on the same basis as that used for internal reporting purposes.
Operating segments are now reported in a manner that is consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision‐maker has been identified as the board of directors of AusQuest Limited.
The following table presents the revenue, results and certain asset and liability information regarding the segment information provided to the Board of Directors for the year ended 30 June 2012.
| Continuing Operations | Continuing Operations | Continuing Operations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia $ |
Africa $ |
Other $ |
Intersegment eliminations $ |
Consolidated $ |
|
| 30 June 2012: Segment revenue Segment loss after tax Unallocated expenses Segment net loss after tax Segment assets Segment liabilities Included within segment result: Depreciation Interest income Impairment of exploration expenditure |
571,960 | ‐ | 159 | (121,343) | 450,776 |
| (9,163,580) | 21,108 | 215,857 | (121,343) | (9,047,957) | |
| 22,691,953 | 12,389,324 | 127,316 | (11,609,961) | ‐ | |
| (9,047,957) | |||||
| 23,598,632 | |||||
| 720,110 | 3,365,623 | 608,529 | (3,788,386) | 905,876 | |
| 48,471 392,549 7,909,791 |
‐ ‐ ‐ |
‐ 159 ‐ |
‐ ‐ ‐ |
48,471 392,708 7,909,791 |
| C | ontinuing operations | ontinuing operations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia $ |
Africa $ |
Other $ |
Intersegment eliminations $ |
Consolidated $ |
|
| 30 June 2011: Segment revenue Segment loss after tax Unallocated expenses Segment net loss after tax Segment assets Segment liabilities Included within segment result: Depreciation Interest income Impairment of exploration expenditure |
5,072,148 | ‐ | ‐ | (378,476) | 4,693,672 |
| (9,406,993) | (15,401) | (717,133) | (353,649) | (10,493,176) ‐ |
|
| 32,426,156 | 9,401,183 | 489,541 | (8,572,192) | ||
| (10,493,176) | |||||
| 33,744,688 | |||||
| 991,096 | 5,330,406 | 1,169,345 | (5,143,967) | 2,346,880 | |
| 47,671 914,346 12,141,108 |
‐ ‐ ‐ |
‐ ‐ ‐ |
‐ ‐ ‐ |
47,671 914,346 12,141,108 |
37
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
5. Revenue
An analysis of the Group’s revenue for the year, from continuing operations, is as follows:
| An analysis of the Group’s revenue for the year, from continuing operations, is as follows: | |
|---|---|
| Continuing operations Interest income Profit on disposal of tenements Other income |
Consolidated |
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 392,708 914,346 ‐ 3,779,326 58,068 ‐ |
|
| 450,776 4,693,672 |
6. Loss for the year
Loss for the year includes the following expenses:
| Depreciation of non‐current assets Operating lease rental expenses: Minimum lease payments Employee benefits expense: Share‐based payments |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 48,471 47,671 |
|
| 109,175 127,542 |
|
| ‐ 265,215 |
7. Income taxes
Income tax recognised in profit or loss
| Tax expense/(income) comprises: Current tax expense/(income) Deferred tax expense/(income) relating to the origination and reversal of temporary differences Total tax expense/(income) |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ |
|
| ‐ ‐ |
The prima facie income tax benefit on pre‐tax accounting loss from operations reconciles to the income tax expense in the financial statements as follows:
| The prima facie income tax benefit on pre‐tax accounting loss from operations reconciles to financial statements as follows: |
the income tax expense in the |
|---|---|
| Loss from operations Income tax benefit calculated at 30% Effect of expenses that are not deductible in determining taxable profit Effect of changes in unrecognised temporary differences Effect of unused tax losses and tax offsets not recognised as deferred tax assets |
9,047,957 10,493,176 |
| 2,714,387 3,147,953 (2,480,522) (3,929,764) 227,390 (240,917) (461,255) 1,022,728 |
|
| ‐ ‐ |
The tax rate used in the above reconciliation is the corporate tax rate of 30% payable by Australian corporate entities on taxable profits under Australian tax law. There has been no change in the corporate tax rate when compared with the previous reporting period.
38
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
7. Income taxes (contd)
Unrecognised deferred tax assets and liabilities
| Unrecognised deferred tax assets and liabilities | |
|---|---|
| The following deferred tax assets and (liabilities) have not been brought to account: Tax losses – revenue Temporary differences Deferred tax assets not recognized in equity – share issue costs |
Consolidated |
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 7,664,152 6,279,742 (3,514,569) (3,030,369) |
|
| 4,149,583 3,249,373 |
|
| 84,517 917,163 |
Relevance of tax consolidation to the Group
The Company and its wholly‐owned Australian resident entities have formed a tax‐consolidated group and are therefore taxed as a single entity. The head entity within the tax‐consolidated group is AusQuest Ltd. The members of the tax‐consolidated group (incorporated in Australia) are identified at note 19.
8. Trade and other receivables
| Current Goods and services tax recoverable Accrued interest income Deferred sales proceeds (i) Security deposits Other debtors ‐ secured Other debtors ‐ unsecured Non Current Deferred sales proceeds (i) |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 55,020 178,761 31,803 233,785 750,000 1,125,000 117,385 135,608 ‐ 292,516 318,197 107,606 |
|
| 1,272,405 2,073,276 |
|
| ‐ 750,000 |
|
| ‐ 750,000 |
- (i) During the 2011 financial year the Group entered into an agreement with Dragon Energy Limited to sell its two iron ore projects in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Under the agreement, the combined assets were sold for $7.5 million. This included a payment of $0.5 million for the Nameless Project, which was received during the year, and $7.0 million for the Rocklea Project (75% AQD).
On completion of the Rocklea sale, Dragon Energy paid a first installment, being $3.375 million (75% of $4.5 million). The two remaining installments payable to AusQuest were as follows:
-
$1.125 million (75% of $1.5 million) which was paid on 19 January 2012, being 12 months after completion date, and
-
$0.75 million (75% of $1.0 million) to be paid by 19 January 2013, being 24 months after completion.
The Rocklea sale agreement required Dragon Energy Limited to grant AusQuest a registrable first ranking fixed charge over the tenement in order to secure payment of the deferred components of the consideration and to provide the following non‐exhaustive covenants in favour of the Vendors, being AusQuest and its joint ventue partners:
-
(a) to preserve the Tenement and maintain it in good standing;
-
(b) not to sell, assign, sublease, transfer, farm‐out or grant any rights to all or part of the tenement or grant any mineral rights or split commodity rights in relation to the tenement, without the Vendors’ prior written consent; and
-
(c) not to permit any new encumbrances in relation to the tenement without the Vendors’ prior written consent.
These conditions will remain in force until such time as the deferred consideration has been paid in full.
If any party defaults in the performance of the agreement and such default continues unremedied for 14 days after receipt of a default notice, then the non‐defaulting party or parties may rescind the Rocklea sale agreement and/or sue the defaulting party for specific performance.
39
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
9. Other assets
| 9. Other assets | |
|---|---|
| Current Prepayments |
Consolidated |
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 75,350 91,267 |
|
| 75,350 91,267 |
10. Property, plant and equipment
| Gross carrying amount Balance at 1 July 2010 Additions Assets written off Balance at 30 June 2011 Additions Assets written off Balance at 30 June 2012 Accumulated depreciation and impairment Balance at 1 July 2010 Assets written off Depreciation expense Balance at 30 June 2011 Assets written off Depreciation expense Balance at 30 June 2012 Net book value As at 30 June 2011 As at 30 June 2012 |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| Office furniture and equipment at cost $ |
|
| 350,655 38,275 (12,793) |
|
| 376,137 32,021 (71,293) |
|
| 336,865 | |
| Consolidated Office furniture and equipment at cost $ |
|
| 207,149 (6,388) 47,671 |
|
| 248,432 (62,494) 48,471 |
|
| 234,409 | |
| 127,705 | |
| 102,456 |
11. Exploration and evaluation expenditure
| Exploration and evaluation phase: Balance at beginning of year Capitalised during the year Disposals for the year Impaired during the year (i) Balance at end of year |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 19,267,933 23,531,396 5,713,481 9,848,319 ‐ (1,970,674) (7,909,791) (12,141,108) |
|
| 17,071,623 19,267,933 |
The ultimate recoupment of costs carried forward in respect of areas of interest still in the exploration and/or evaluation phases is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation or, alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.
40
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
11. Exploration and evaluation expenditure (contd)
- (i) Significant impairments to the following projects occurred during the year:
| (i) Significant impairments to the following projects occurred during the year: | |
|---|---|
| Table Hill Plenty River Mt Ramsay Diamantina Bellary Savory WYO Well |
2012 $ 2011 $ |
| 3,715,212 5,144,497 3,520,114 ‐ 321,686 ‐ ‐ 2,896,214 ‐ 1,902,209 ‐ 1,280,906 ‐ 374,584 |
12. Trade and other payables
| 12. Trade and other payables | |
|---|---|
| Trade payables (i) | Consolidated |
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 823,728 2,265,695 |
|
| 823,728 2,265,695 |
- (i) The average credit period on purchases and services is 30 days. No interest is charged on the trade payables for the first 30 to 60 days from the date of the invoice. Thereafter, interest may be charged at various penalty rates on the outstanding balance. The Group has financial risk management policies in place to ensure that all payables are paid within the credit timeframe.
13. Provisions
| Current Employee benefits (i) |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 82,148 81,185 |
|
| 82,148 81,185 |
(i) The current provision for employee benefits relates to annual leave and long service leave entitlements.
14. Issued capital
| 14. Issued capital | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 228,312,235 fully paid ordinary shares (2011: 228,312,235) Fully paid ordinary shares Balance at beginning and end of financial year |
2012 No. $ |
Consolidated | |
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|||
| 52,307,672 52,307,672 |
|||
| 2011 | |||
| No. | No. $ |
||
| 228,312,235 | 52,307,672 | 228,312,235 52,307,672 |
Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry the right to dividends.
Share options on issue
Share options issued by the Company carry no rights to dividends and no voting rights.
As at 30 June 2012, the Company has 6,500,000 share options on issue (2011: 7,000,000) exercisable on a 1:1 basis for 6,500,000 shares (2011: 7,000,000) at various exercise prices. The options will expire between 31/12/2012 and 1/12/2013. Further details of options granted to Directors and employees are contained in note 22 to the financial statements.
41
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
15. Reserves
| Share‐based payments reserve Foreign currency translation reserve Non‐controlling contribution reserve Total reserves |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 761,395 847,395 300,239 8,554 ‐ (577,005) |
|
| 1,061,634 278,944 |
Movements in these reserves during the year are disclosed in the consolidated statement of changes in equity.
The share‐based payments reserve arises on the grant of share options to executive, employees, consultants and advisors. Further information about share‐based payments to employees is made in notes 22 and 23 to the financial statements.
The foreign currency translation reserve is used to record exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries.
The non‐controlling contribution reserve is used to record the differences described in note 2(a) which may arise as a result of transactions with non‐controlling interests that do not result in a loss of control.
16. Loss per share
| 16. Loss per share | |
|---|---|
| Basic loss per share Basic loss per share |
Consolidated |
| 2012 Cents per share 2011 Cents per share |
|
| 3.97 4.59 |
|
The loss and weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the calculation of basic loss per share are as follows:
| Net loss Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of basic loss per share |
2012 $ 2011 $ |
|---|---|
| 9,053,588 10,487,100 |
|
| 2012 No. 2011 No. |
|
| 228,312,235 228,312,235 |
Diluted loss per share
Diluted loss per share has not been calculated as the result does not increase loss per share.
17a. Commitments for expenditure
| 17a. Commitments for expenditure | |
|---|---|
| Exploration expenditure Annual expenditure commitment |
Consolidated |
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 1,941,304 4,208,930 |
|
| 1,941,304 4,208,930 |
42
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
17b. Operating Lease commitments
The Company entered into an operating lease for its office premises at 8 Kearns Crescent, Ardross. The lease commenced on 1 August 2010 and is for a term of 6 years.
| Annual lease commitment | Consolidated 2012 $ 2011 $ 98,452 92,800 98,542 92,800 |
|---|---|
18. Contingent liabilities
In the opinion of the Directors, there were no material contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2012 and no contingent liabilities have arisen in the interval between the period end and the date of this financial report.
19. Subsidiaries
| Name of entity | Country of incorporation | Ownership interest | Ownership interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 % |
2011 % |
||
| Parent entity AusQuest Ltd (i) Australia Subsidiaries Fortescue Resources Pty Ltd Australia E&A Resources Pty Ltd British Virgin Islands Questdor SAC Peru Sub‐subsidiary Comoe Exploration SARL Burkina Faso |
100% 100% 100% 60% 100% 100% 100% 60% |
(i) AusQuest Ltd is the head entity within the tax consolidated group. All the Australian‐incorporated companies are members of the tax consolidated group.
20. Notes to the consolidated statement of cash flows
(a) Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand and in banks and investments in money market instruments, net of outstanding bank overdrafts. Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year as shown in the statement of cash flows are reconciled to the related items in the statement of financial position as follows:
| Cash and cash equivalents | Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 5,076,798 11,434,507 |
|
| 5,076,798 11,434,507 |
43
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
20. Notes to the consolidated statement of cash flows (contd)
- (b) Reconciliation of loss for the year to net cash flows from operating activities
| Loss for the year Depreciation Equity‐settled share‐based payment Gain on sale of exploration expenditure Plant and equipment written off Exploration expenditure written off and impaired Changes in net assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition and disposal of businesses: (Increase)/decrease in assets: Trade and other receivables Prepayments Increase/(decrease) in liabilities: Trade and other payables Provisions Net cash used in operating activities |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| (9,047,957) (10,493,176) 48,471 47,671 ‐ 265,215 ‐ (3,779,326) 8,799 6,405 7,980,834 12,141,108 425,869 (627,217) 15,918 (52,633) 25,155 (331,067) 964 36,794 |
|
| (541,947) (2,786,226) |
21. Financial instruments
Overview
The Company has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:
-
Credit risk
-
Liquidity risk
-
Interest rate risk
-
Capital management
This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, their objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk, and the management of capital. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout this note and the financial report.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework. Risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group’s activities. The Group, aim to develop a disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.
Credit risk management
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group. The Group does not have any significant credit risk exposure to any single counterparty or any group of counterparties having similar characteristics. The credit risk on liquid funds is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit‐ratings assigned by international credit‐rating agencies.
Liquidity risk management
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when they fall due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation.
Liquidity risk management is the responsibility of the board of Directors, who have built an appropriate liquidity risk management framework for the management of the Company’s short, medium and long‐term funding and liquidity management requirements.
44
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
21. Financial instruments (contd)
The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves, banking facilities and reserve borrowing facilities by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities, identifying when further capital raising initiatives are required.
Liquidity and interest risk tables
The following tables detail the Group’s remaining contractual maturity for its non‐derivative financial assets and liabilities and have been prepared on the following basis:
-
Financial assets ‐ based on the undiscounted contractual maturities including interest that will be earned on those assets except where the Company/Group anticipates that the cash flow will occur in a different period; and
-
Financial liabilities ‐ based on undiscounted cash flows on the earliest date on which the Group can be required to pay, including both interest and principal cash flows.
| CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Less than 1 month |
1‐3 months | 3 months to 1 year |
1 ‐ 5 years | 5+ years | Total |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Financial assets Non‐interest bearing Variable interest rate Fixed interest rate Financial liabilities Non‐interest bearing |
65,483 293,203 764,275 ‐ ‐ 1,122,961 521,446 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 521,446 4,586,420 68,240 51,865 ‐ ‐ 4,706,525 |
|||||
| 5,173,349 361,443 816,140 ‐ ‐ 6,350,932 |
||||||
| 540,320 261,408 22,000 ‐ ‐ 823,728 |
||||||
| 540,320 261,408 22,000 ‐ ‐ 823,728 |
| 2011 | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 month $ |
1‐3 months $ |
3 months to 1 year $ |
Total $ |
|||
| 1 ‐ 5 years | 5+ years | |||||
| $ | $ | |||||
| Financial assets Non‐interest bearing Variable interest rate Fixed interest rate Financial liabilities Non‐interest bearing |
736,584 204,802 1,270,304 750,000 ‐ 2,961,690 2,193,115 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,193,115 2,043,570 7,000,000 135,608 ‐ ‐ 9,179,178 |
|||||
| 4,973,269 7,204,802 1,405,912 750,000 ‐ 14,333,983 |
||||||
| 1,326,305 919,390 20,000 ‐ ‐ 2,265,695 |
||||||
| 1,326,305 919,390 20,000 ‐ ‐ 2,265,695 |
Interest rate risk management
The Group is exposed to interest rate risk as it places funds at both fixed and floating interest rates. The Group manages this risk by maintaining an appropriate mix between fixed and floating rated products, which also facilitate access to money.
Although some of the Group’s assets are subject to interest rate risk, it is not dependent on this income. Interest income is only incidental to the Group’s operations and operating cash flows.
The Group is not exposed to interest rate risk associated with borrowed funds.
Interest rate sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity analyses of the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk at the reporting date has been determined based on a change of 50 basis points in interest rates.
At reporting dated, if interest rates had been 50 basis points higher and all other variables were constant, the Group’s net loss after tax would have decreased by $2,607(2011: $10,966) with a corresponding increase in equity. Where interest rates decreased, there would be an equal and opposite impact on the loss after tax and equity.
45
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
21. Financial instruments (contd)
Foreign currency risk management
The Group undertakes certain transactions in foreign currencies, hence exposures to exchange rate fluctuations arise. Exchange rate exposures are managed within approved policy parameters.
The carrying amounts of the Group’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at the balance date in Australian dollars are as follows:
| Assets | Assets | Liabilities | Liabilities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 $ |
2011 $ |
2012 $ |
2011 $ |
|
| US Dollars 203,289 785,339 185,766 1,355,785 |
Foreign currency sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity analyses of the Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date has been determined based on a change of 10% in the value of the Australian dollar against the relevant foreign currencies.
The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign currency denominated monetary items and adjusts their translation at the period end for a 10% change in foreign currency rates.
At reporting dated, if the Australian dollar was 10% stronger and all other variables were constant, the Group’s net loss after tax would have decreased by $17,505 (2011: $133,443) with a corresponding increase in equity. Where the Australian dollar weakened, there would be an equal and opposite impact on the loss after tax and equity.
Capital management
The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business. The capital structure of the Group consists of equity only, comprising issued capital and reserves, net of accumulated losses. The Group’s policy is to use capital market issues to meet the funding requirements of the Group.
There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the year.
Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
The Group has adopted the amendments to AASB 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures which require disclosure of fair value measurements by level of the following fair value measurement hierarchy:
-
level 1 ‐ quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
-
level 2 ‐ inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly ( derived from prices), and
-
level 3 ‐ inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
The Group has no financial assets or liabilities at 30 June 2012 which have been measured at fair value using any of the above measurements.
The carrying amount of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the financial statements represents their respective net fair values, determined in accordance with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 2. The Directors consider that the carrying amount of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the financial statements approximate their values (2011: net fair values).
46
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
22. Share‐based payments
Employee share options
The Company has an ownership‐based compensation arrangement for consultants and employees of the Company.
Each option issued under the arrangement converts into one ordinary share of AusQuest Limited on exercise. No amounts are paid or payable by the recipient on receipt of the option. Options neither carry rights to dividends nor voting rights. Options may be exercised at any time from the date of vesting to the date of their expiry. The number of options granted is at the sole discretion of the Directors.
Incentive options issued to Directors (executive and non‐executive) are subject to approval by shareholders and attach vesting conditions as appropriate.
Share based payment arrangements in existence during period
The following share‐based payment arrangements were in existence during the current and comparative reporting periods:
| Options series | Number | Grant date | Expiry date | Exercise price $ |
Fair value at grant date $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2011(i) 3,700,000 11 July 2006 30 June 2011 0.54 0.126 31 Jan 2012(ii) 500,000 1 Aug 2007 31 Jan 2012 0.30 0.172 31 Dec 2012 1,250,000 1 Feb 2008 31 Dec 2012 0.35 0.190 1 Dec 2013 1,350,000 13 Feb 2009 1 Dec 2013 0.20 0.106 1 Dec 2013 1,150,000 13 Feb 2009 1 Dec 2013 0.40 0.101 30 Nov 2013 500,000 26 Nov 2010 30 Nov 2013 0.30 0.116 30 Nov 2013 500,000 26 Nov 2010 30 Nov 2013 0.40 0.107 30 Nov 2013 1,750,000 3 Dec 2010 30 Nov 2013 0.40 0.088 |
(i) These options expired in the prior year
(ii) These options expired in the current year
There were no new share based payments granted during the current financial year. The expense recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in relation to share based payments granted in 2011 is disclosed in note 6.
The fair value of the share options granted during the financial year is $nil (2011: $265,215). In the previous financial year, options were priced using a Black & Scholes pricing model. Expected volatility is based on the movement of the underlying share price around its average share price over the expected term of the option. The Directors have determined the expected period of exercise to be similar to the option life based on historical experience.
| Inputs into the model | Option series | Option series | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Nov 2013 | 30 Nov 2013 | 30 Nov 2013 | |
| Grant date share price (cents) Exercise price (cents) Expected volatility Option life Dividend yield Risk‐free interest rate |
18.5 cents 30 cents 115% 3 years ‐ 5.15% |
18.5 cents 16 cents 40 cents 40 cents 115% 115% 3 years 3 years ‐ ‐ 5.15% 5.05% |
The following table shows a reconciliation of the outstanding share options granted as share based payments at the beginning and end of the financial year:
47
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
22. Share‐based payments (contd)
| Balance at beginning of the financial year Granted during the financial year Lapsed during the financial year Balance at end of the financial year (i) Exercisable at end of the financial year |
2012 Number of Options Weighted average exercise price $ 7,000,000 0.34 ‐ ‐ (500,000) 0.30 6,500,000 0.34 6,500,000 0.34 |
2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Options Weighted average exercise price $ |
||
| 7,950,000 0.42 2,750,000 0.38 (3,700,000) 0.54 |
||
| 7,000,000 0.34 |
||
| 7,000,000 0.34 |
(i) Balance at end of the financial year
The share options outstanding at the end of the financial year had a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.24 years (2011: 2.12 years).
23. Related party transactions
(a) Equity interests in related parties
Equity interests in subsidiaries
Details of the percentage of ordinary shares held in subsidiaries are disclosed in note 19 to the financial statements.
(b) Transactions with key management personnel
Key management personnel compensation
Details of key management personnel compensation are disclosed in the Remuneration Report which forms part of the Directors’ Report and has been audited. The aggregate compensation of the key management personnel is summarised below:
| Short term employee benefits Post employment benefits Other benefits Share based payments |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 590,059 584,187 30,844 35,945 38,571 38,821 ‐ 111,503 |
|
| 659,474 770,456 |
Key management personnel equity holdings
Fully paid ordinary shares of AusQuest Ltd
| Balance at 1 July |
Balance on appointment |
Granted as compensation |
Received on exercise of options |
Balance on resignation |
Balance at 30 June |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | No. | No. | No. | No. | No. | |
| 2012 Greg Hancock Chris Ellis John Ashley Graeme Drew Peter Ravenscroft(i) Craig Moulton (i) |
1,058,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A 1,058,000 10,668,658 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A 10,668,658 6,071,630 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A 6,071,630 4,747,241 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A 4,747,241 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ |
|||||
| 22,545,529 ‐ ‐ ‐ 22,545,529 |
48
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
23. Related party transactions (contd)
| Balance at 1 July Balance on appointment Granted as compensation Received on exercise of options Balance on resignation Balance at 30 June |
|
|---|---|
| No. No. No. No. No. No. |
|
| 2011 Greg Hancock Chris Ellis John Ashley Graeme Drew Richard Mehan(i) Peter Ravenscroft(i) Craig Moulton (i) |
1,058,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A 1,058,000 10,668,658 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A 10,668,658 6,071,630 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A 6,071,630 4,747,241 ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A 4,747,241 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ |
| 22,545,529 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 22,545,529 |
Share options of AusQuest Ltd
| Balance at 1 July |
Balance on appointment |
Granted as compen‐ sation |
Exercised | Net other change |
Balance on resignation |
Balance at 30 June |
Vested during year |
Vested during year |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | No. | No. | No. | No.(ii) | No. | No. | No. | ||
| 2012 Greg Hancock Chris Ellis John Ashley Graeme Drew Peter Ravenscroft(i) Craig Moulton (i) |
|||||||||
| Balance at 1 July |
Balance on appointment |
Granted as compen‐ sation |
Exercised | Net other change |
Vested and exercisable at 30 June |
||||
| Balance on | Balance at | Vested | |||||||
| resignation | 30 June | during year | |||||||
| No. | No. | No. | No. | No.(ii) | No. | No. | No. | No. | |
| 2011 Greg Hancock Chris Ellis John Ashley Graeme Drew Richard Mehan(i) Peter Ravenscroft(i) Craig Moulton (i) |
300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ (300,000) N/A ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ (500,000) N/A ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 ‐ 1,000,000 ‐ (1,000,000) N/A 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ N/A ‐ ‐ ‐ |
||||||||
| 1,800,000 ‐1,000,000 ‐ (1,800,000) ‐ 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 |
(i) Mr Richard Mehan, Mr Peter Ravenscroft and Mr. Craig Moulton are/were full time employees of Cliffs Natural Resources Pty Ltd
(“Cliffs”). Cliffs hold 68,308,791 shares but Mr Mehan, Mr Ravenscroft and Mr Moulton do not/did not hold shares or options independently.
Further details of the employee share option plan and of share options relating to the 2011 financial year are contained in note 22 to the financial statements.
49
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
23. Related party transactions (contd)
Other transactions with key management personnel of the Group
Premises were rented by the Group for the financial year from A Super Pty Ltd, an entity associated with John Ashley on commercial terms. Rental fees incurred during the year totaled $54,151 (2011: $52,513) and the balance payable by the Company to A Super Pty Ltd at year end was $4,381 (2011: $4,299).
During the previous year, consulting services were provided by Hancock Corporate Investments Pty Ltd, an entity associated with Greg Hancock. Services provided during the previous year totaled $45,000 and the balance payable by the Company to Hancock Corporate Investments Pty Ltd at the end of the previous year was $ $11,250.
(c) Transactions with other related parties
Other related parties include:
-
the parent entity
-
entities with significant influence over the Group
-
associates
-
joint ventures in which the entity is a venturer
-
other related parties.
During the year the Group entered into a Joint Venture arrangement with Cliffs Natural Resources Exploration Inc. (“Cliffs”), a Company associated with a substantial shareholder of the Group whereby each party would contribute 50% of funding for exploration work in South West Peru. During the year the Group received total reimbursements to the value of $870,228 from Cliffs. At year end there was $293,203 outstanding from Cliffs, as disclosed in note 8.
(d) Parent entities
The ultimate parent entity in the Group is AusQuest Ltd.
24. Remuneration of auditors
| Auditor of the Group Audit or review of the financial report Other audit services The auditor of AusQuest Ltd is HLB Mann Judd. |
Consolidated |
|---|---|
| 2012 $ 2011 $ |
|
| 32,970 31,450 ‐ ‐ |
|
| 32,970 31,450 |
|
25. Subsequent events
There has been no matter or circumstance, other than that referred to in the financial statements or notes thereto, that has arisen since the end of the financial year, that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect, the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.
26. Parent Entity Disclosures
As at 30 June 2012, and throughout the financial year ended 30 June 2012 the parent company of the Group was AusQuest Ltd.
| Result of the parent entity Loss for the year Other comprehensive income Total comprehensive loss for the year Financial position of parent entity at year end Current assets Non‐current assets Total assets Current liabilities Total liabilities |
2012 $ 2011 $ |
|---|---|
| (9,645,663) (11,414,503) 175,353 ‐ |
|
| (9,470,310) (11,414,503) |
|
| 5,593,059 11,856,134 14,930,708 18,408,286 |
|
| 20,523,767 30,264,420 |
|
| 720,111 990,453 |
|
| 720,111 990,453 |
50
AusQuest Ltd Notes to the financial statements
Notes to the financial statements
for the financial year ended 30 June 2012
26. Parent Entity Disclosures (contd)
| 26. Parent Entity Disclosures (contd) | |
|---|---|
| Total equity of the parent entity comprising of: Share capital Reserves Accumulated losses Total equity Parent entity contingencies The parent entity has no contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2012 (2011: nil). |
2012 $ 2011 $ |
| 52,307,672 52,307,672 936,748 847,395 (33,440,764) (23,881,101) |
|
| 19,803,656 29,273,966 |
|
Included in Non‐current assets are investments in and loans to subsidiaries of $9,716,784, the recoverability of which is dependent on the successful exploitation of the subsidiaries exploration assets.
Parent entity capital commitments
The parent entity currently has no capital commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment.
27. Acquisition of controlled entity
During the current year, E&A Resources Pty Ltd issued additional ordinary shares to AusQuest Ltd which increased AusQuest’s interest from 60% to 80%. This was as a result of AusQuest meeting the second stage of its minimum expenditure requirements under the shareholders deed with Endeavour Mining Ltd in relation to the Banfora Gold Project.
On 19 January 2012, AusQuest further increased its interest in E&A Resources Pty Ltd to 100% by purchasing the remaining 20% from Endeavour Exploration Limited in exchange for a net smelter royalty of 1.5%.
51