AI assistant
Atlas Copco — Annual Report 2012
Jun 25, 2013
2883_10-k_2013-06-25_2a4c3228-5608-4f29-a6fd-e0d1e74d98ec.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Atlas Copco 2012 – a record year
Performance summary 2012
| Financial | Units | Goal | 2012 | 2011 | Change, % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orders received | MSEK | 90 570 | 86 955 | +4 | ||
| Revenues | MSEK | 8% growth | 90 533 | 81 203 | +11 | |
| EBITDA | MSEK | 21 892 | 20 082 | +9 | ||
| Operating profit | MSEK | 19 228 | 17 560 | +9 | ||
| – as a percentage of revenues | % | 21.2 | 21.6 | |||
| Profit before tax | MSEK | 18 538 | 17 276 | +7 | ||
| – as a percentage of revenues | % | 20.5 | 21.3 | |||
| Profit for the year | MSEK | 13 914 | 12 988 | +7 | ||
| Basic earnings per share | SEK | 11.45 | 10.68 | |||
| Diluted earnings per share | SEK | 11.43 | 10.62 | |||
| Dividend per share | SEK | About 50% of earnings per share |
5.501) | 5.00 | +10 | |
| Equity per share | SEK | 29 | 24 | |||
| Operating cash flow | MSEK | 12 233 | 6 292 | +94 | ||
| Return on capital employed | % | Sustained high | 35.7 | 37.2 | ||
| Return on equity | % | 44.5 | 47.6 | |||
| Environmental | Units | Goal | 2012 | 2011 | Change | |
| CO2 emissions | '000 tonnes | 332 | 340 | –8 | ||
| – from operations (Scope 1+2) | '000 tonnes | –20%/COS2) | 105 | 126 | –21 | |
| – from transport (Scope 3) | '000 tonnes | –20%/COS2) | 227 | 214 | +13 | |
| Water consumption | '000 m3 | +–0 m3/COS | 623 | 619 | +4 | |
| Waste | % | Reuse, recover or recycle all waste |
92 | 95 | –3 | |
| Sustainable construction | number | Increase | 4 | 3 | +1 | |
| ISO 14001 environmental management systems | % of cost of sales | 100 | 94 | 95 | –1 | |
| employees, health and safe ty |
Units | Goal | 2012 | 2011 | Change | |
| Average number of employees | number | 39 113 | 35 131 | +3 982 | ||
| Competence development | hours/employee | 42 | 45 | –3 | ||
| Yearly appraisals | % | 100 | 83 | 84 | –1 | |
| Internal mobility | % | Encourage | 8.2 | 9.3 | –1.1 | |
| Proportion of women employees | % | Increase | 16.9 | 16.8 | +0.1 | |
| Diversity in nationality among senior managers | number | Increase | 49 | 44 | +5 | |
| Sick leave | % | <2.5 | 2.1 | 2.0 | +0.1 | |
| Accidents | number/one million hours | 0 | 5.4 | 5.7 | –0.3 | |
| Fatalities | number | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | |
| OHSAS 18001 health and safety systems | % of cost of sales | 100 | 72 | 67 | +5 | |
| Governance | Units | Goal | 2012 | 2011 | Change | |
| Training in Business Code of Practice, managers | % | 100 | 25 | 33 | –8 | |
| Reporting to hotline | number | Encourage | 39 | 25 | +14 |
Positive trend/goal achieved Neutral Negative trend/goal not acheived
Suppliers committed to Business Code of Practice % Increase 76 75 +1
1) Proposed by the Board of Directors.
2) –20%/COS by 2020.
Atlas Copco in brief
Orders received, revenues and operating margin
Earnings per share
Energy consumption
A relative decrease in energy consumption due to investments in more energyefficient solutions.
Committed to sustainable productivity
Revenues increased
11%
to MSEK 90 533
Operating profit up
9%
to MSEK 19 228
CO2 emissions
–17%
from production sites
Proposed dividend up
10%
to SEK 5.50 per share
Ronnie Leten, President and CEO
"Atlas Copco achieved a record result for 2012 despite softening conditions in many markets. Previous changes to our organization that strengthened our service offering had a positive effect and we continued with actions to increase customer focus and drive growth."
page 3
With innovative products and services, Atlas Copco delivers solutions for sustainable productivity. Investments in product development increased 24%.
page 40
Proud employees all over the world
We strive to be First in Mind—First in Choice® for today's and future employees. Our employee survey for 2012 showed that employees are proud to work for Atlas Copco and that there is a strong customer focus in the Group.
page 42
The Industrial Technique business area offers the most extensive range of industrial power tools and assembly systems in the market.
page 24
Water for All has provided access to clean water to more than 1.2 million people.
Contents
| Performance summary 2012 | Inside front cover |
|---|---|
| Atlas Copco in brief | Inside front cover |
| Committed to sustainable productivity | 1 |
| Contents | 2 |
| About the annual report | 2 |
| President and CEO | 3 |
| This is Atlas Copco | 6 |
| Vision, mission, strategy, structure and governance | 6 |
| Goals for sustainable, profitable development | 7 |
| People and processes | 8 |
| Stakeholders | 9 |
| This is how we do business | 10 |
| The year in review | 12 |
| Administration report | 13 |
| Atlas Copco Group | 13 |
| Market review and demand development | 14 |
| Important events | 15 |
| Financial summary and analysis | 16 |
| Parent company | 19 |
| Compressor Technique | 20 |
| Industrial Technique | 24 |
| Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 28 |
| Construction Technique | 32 |
| Risks, risk management and opportunities | 36 |
| Innovative, sustainable products and services | 40 |
| Employees | 42 |
| Business partners | 45 |
| Society | 46 |
| Environment | 48 |
| Steps to sustainable, profitable development | 50 |
| The Atlas Copco share | 52 |
| Corporate governance | 56 |
| Financial statements (Group) | 66 |
| Notes (Group) | 70 |
| Financial statements (Parent) | 109 |
| Notes (Parent) | 111 |
| Audit report | 124 |
| Financial definitions | 125 |
| Five years in summary | 126 |
| Sustainability notes (Group) | 127 |
| Audit review report on sustainability information | 131 |
| Financial information | 132 |
| Addresses | 133 |
About the annual report
Atlas Copco believes in delivering innovative products, reliable services and profitable growth while being a responsible corporate citizen. This annual report reflects Atlas Copco's goal of creating sustainable, profitable development and it integrates financial, sustainability and governance information in order to describe Atlas Copco in a comprehensive and cohesive manner.
The report is divided into two sections for simple navigation.
This is Atlas Copco contains the relevant information about Atlas Copco's vision, mission, strategy, structure and governance, how we do business as well as long-term performance.
The year in review discusses Atlas Copco's annual performance and achievements.
The audited annual accounts and consolidated accounts can be found on pages 13–44 and 56–123 and includes the corporate governance report on pages 56–65.
Sustainability information that have been reviewed by the auditors for limited assurance can be found on pages 9–12, 45–49 and 127–130.
Note: The amounts are presented in MSEK unless otherwise indicated and numbers in parentheses represent comparative figures for the preceding year.
Forward-looking statements: Some statements in this report are forwardlooking, and the actual outcomes could be materially different. In addition to the factors explicitly discussed, other factors could have a material effect on the actual outcomes. Such factors include, but are not limited to, general business conditions, fluctuations in exchange rates and interest rates, political developments, the impact of competing products and their pricing, product development, commercialization and technological difficulties, interruptions in supply, and major customer credit losses.
Atlas Copco AB and its subsidiaries are sometimes referred to as the Atlas Copco Group, the Group, or Atlas Copco. Atlas Copco AB is also sometimes referred to as Atlas Copco. Any mention of the Board of Directors or the Board refers to the Board of Directors of Atlas Copco AB.
This symbol indicates that further information is available on Atlas Copco's website, www.atlascopco.com.
Priorities for sustainable, profitable growth
Atlas Copco achieved a record result for 2012 despite softening conditions in many markets. Previous changes to our organization that strengthened our service offering had a positive effect and we continued with actions to increase customer focus and drive growth. We extended our product offerings through innovations and acquisitions that create sustainable productivity for our customers. Internally, we enhanced efficiency and raised further awareness about key issues such as safety and corruption.
Atlas Copco has defined five key priorities to drive sustainable profitable development: service, presence, innovation, operational excellence, and people.
Summary of 2012
During the first six months of the year, the demand from customers in most segments remained on a high level, and we were positively surprised by the good development in North America. The increasingly important service business helped offset the softening of demand for our equipment that we began to see in the second half of the year. In total, we saw an organic 2% increase in orders received for 2012.
The organizational structure introduced in mid-2011 had a positive effect. It increased the number of business areas from three to four and created a service division in each of them to ensure we get as close as possible to the customers.
Atlas Copco has defined five key priorities to drive sustainable profitable development: service, presence, innovation, operational excellence, and people.
Service gives loyal customers
The established business area structure brings a stronger focus on service. In the current challenging business climate we focus more than ever on providing the best support. Service is not just about maintaining and repairing machines. We also see growing demand for training and simulators that let customers get comfortable using equipment in a safe, virtual environment.
One reason why we are so keen on service is because it gives us the opportunity to interact almost daily with our customers. We get to see how the equipment is running to ensure it is working exactly as it should, plus it is a good source for innovation. It lets
us learn about difficulties customers have and about opportunities for us to increase their productivity. Service revenues grew 12% in 2012 and represent 40% of our business. To ensure that we provide great service, we strive to have very motivated and competent service engineers. To achieve that, it is key that we have a good support system with top-notch training and logistics. We are a local company when it comes to service but we offer global support. That is rather unique in our business and a valuable asset.
In early 2012, we began to roll out the uniform Atlas Copco service concept that will include advanced logistics systems and field software. All service personnel across the four business areas now have a common brand identity starting with the workwear. The uniform concept will ensure consistent service to customers anywhere at any time.
Strengthening presence
Atlas Copco continued to expand in growth markets such as Asia, South America and Africa, and opened customer centers in, among others, Mozambique, Burkina Faso and Senegal. Acquisitions included Ekomak, a Turkish manufacturer of industrial screw compressors, which increased Atlas Copco's presence in Eastern Europe. Acquisitions are made for two reasons. First, to intensify our presence, dig deeper into a market. The second reason is to extend the product offers to customers.
We want to be present where there are existing and potential customers. This comes with a challenge because we need to be
» We need to be conscious of the risks with complex markets. We therefore work hard to increase awareness of our zero tolerance for corruption.
conscious of the risks with complex markets. We therefore work hard to increase awareness of our zero tolerance for corruption. About 3 500 managers took the annual corruption awareness
training and signed the compliance of the Business Code of Practice. Atlas Copco is a signatory to the UN Global Compact, a strategic policy initiative for businesses that are committed to aligning their operations and strategies with ten universally accepted
principles in the areas of human rights, labor, environment and anti-corruption.
New applications help us strengthen our presence. Our sales people are taking the pulse on the trends and are seeing what our customers need. One example is mining companies' effort to begin production sooner, which is helped by the new Atlas Copco Boomer E1 C-DH face drilling rig that can get started even before water and electricity are installed at the site.
Investing in innovation
We continued to invest heavily in product development, as our success depends on it, and we invested 24% more year-on-year. New products launched include a range of rig-mounted bucket crushers for efficient and economic recycling of all types of material on site such as asphalt, stone and concrete debris as well as mine and quarry material. Other new innovative products include redesigned filters that have much lower pressure drop than their predecessors and hence save energy. Atlas Copco's initiative to boost customer energy efficiency by at least 20% by 2020 by continuously making products more efficient progressed well.
Keeping up the speed of innovation starts with having the best people, and making sure they have the drive to deliver the best products. It is ultimately about seeking to create the highest productivity for our customers. We must also make sure the infrastructure is in place, with test labs, computer systems and other
needed resources. Atlas Copco fosters a culture of innovation by ensuring competent people have the responsibility to understand customer needs and have the freedom to act. We also actively attract external innovators and cooperate with universities.
The Group's John Munck Award, which rewards major technical innovations, was in 2012 presented to developers of a range of light and compact power tools that improved ergonomics, flexibility and productivity.
New innovative products were also added through such acquisitions as Gazcon, a Danish manufacturer of nitrogen and oxygen generators that allow small and medium gas consumers to lower costs and emissions by generating gases on site; MEYCO Equipment, a Swiss producer of mobile equipment for applying sprayed concrete (shotcreting) in underground operations; NewTech Drilling Products, a U.S. maker of durable drilling products designed to be both impact and wear resistant; and GIA Industri, a Swedish manufacturer of electric mine trucks, utility vehicles, continuous loaders and ventilation systems.
Operational excellence
We are continuously finding ways to run the operations more intelligently by for example fine-tuning our lean production and distribution systems around the world and supporting them with sophisticated logistics and IT systems. This creates a more efficient Atlas Copco and further improves customers' experience with the organization.
Our asset-light structure demands speed and efficiency throughout the manufacturing, supplier and distribution chain, as well as in our financial process. We are aiming for a very productive relationship with our suppliers, ensuring they are innovative and highly committed to deliver the right quantities at the right times. To achieve the needed speed we must be close to the customers, and this year we have inaugurated new compressor factories in Pune, India, and in Wuxi, China. Both are top-
… the sales outlets increasingly are not bound to a physical location but leverage the digital world to give customers the best and most efficient experience.
modern facilities built according to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design standard.
Atlas Copco is constantly reducing assembly times, providing customers with faster and more reliable delivery, and is enhancing efficiency in other ways. In 2012 we decided to reorganize the production of road construction equipment in Karlskrona, Sweden, to create a more competitive production unit with stronger future growth potential.
We are phasing in customer centers of the future, meaning that the sales outlets increasingly are not bound to a physical location but leverage the digital world to give customers the best and most efficient experience. We started rolling out a new IT system, expanding the use of video conferencing and increasing remote monitoring.
Operational excellence is also about providing a safe and healthy work environment. Our target is to have zero work-related accidents and a sick-leave level of below 2.5 %.
Competing with competent people
People are key to everything we do. To ensure we have top talented people all over the world we have to utilize 100% of the talent pool. This means we want full diversity when it comes to nationalities, gender and age. The ratio of female employees increased slightly to about 17%. Among the 371 most senior managers there are 49 nationalities, reflecting our long-term ambition to develop local leaders.
Competence development is key to attracting and keeping skilled employees. We are constantly providing coaching sessions to reduce the time to competence.
Among other employee initiatives, we developed a new concept to raise awareness of safety first to be used throughout the company, an effort that will be rolled out over the coming year.
Looking ahead
Despite the uncertain and mixed business climate, Atlas Copco will continue to benefit long-term from the global trends. One such trend is urbanization, which drives demand for more minerals and infrastructure work. Another megatrend is the geographical expansion in regions such as Asia, Africa and South America. These markets still offer a lot of potential. Last but not least is the industry's constant drive for productivity and energy efficiency, which is core to our operations.
We can rely on our business model that revolves around lean manufacturing, being asset light and giving high priority to service. It is generating a strong cash flow even in tough times as well as a healthy return to shareholders. The Board proposes a 10% increase in dividend to SEK 5.50 per share, which is a good balance of rewarding investors while preserving a strong balance sheet.
In 2013, Atlas Copco is celebrating 140 years of sustainable profitable growth. What a tremendous journey it has been for this company. Key to Atlas Copco's success has been its constant drive to be the most innovative, think long-term, as well as be close to customers and provide them with top service. This drive is deeply rooted in Atlas Copco's genes and will continue this year and beyond. There is always a better way. Thank you all.
Ronnie Leten President and CEO Stockholm, January 31, 2013
This is Atlas Copco
Atlas Copco is an industrial group with world-leading positions in compressors, expanders and air treatment systems, construction and mining equipment, power tools and assembly systems. With innovative products and services, Atlas Copco delivers solutions for sustainable productivity.
Vision, mission and strategy
The Atlas Copco Group's vision is to become and remain First in Mind—First in Choice® of its customers and other principal stakeholders. The mission is to achieve sustainable, profitable development. Sustainability plays an important role in Atlas Copco's vision and it is an integral aspect of the Group's mission. An integrated sustainability strategy, backed by ambitious goals, helps the company deliver greater value to all its stakeholders in a way that is economically, environmentally and socially responsible. In order to achieve the mission, the Board of Directors has adopted a number of goals. Strategies and achievements are presented throughout this annual report.
Structure and governance
Atlas Copco's organization is based on the principle of decentralized responsibilities and authorities. Atlas Copco's operations are organized in four business areas comprised of 22 divisions. Each operating unit has a business board which reflects the operational structure of the Group. The duty of a business board is to serve in an advisory and decision-making capacity concerning strategic and operative issues. It also ensures the implementation of controls and assessments. In addition, each legal company has a legal board reflecting the legal structure of the Group.
Committed to sustainable productivity
is Atlas Copco's brand promise. This is a promise to ensure reliable, lasting results with a responsible use of resources – human, natural and capital.
For further information about governance, the Board of Directors and Group Management, see pages 56–65. For further information about risk management, see pages 36–39. Comprehensive information about the business areas can be found on pages 20–35.
Common service providers – internal or external – have been established with the mission to provide services faster, to a higher quality, and at a lower cost, thus allowing the divisions to focus on their core businesses.
The Board of Directors is responsible for the organization and management of the Group, regularly assessing the Group's financial situation and financial, legal, social and environmental risks, and ensuring that the organization is designed for satisfactory control. The Board formally approves the Business Code of Practice.
The President and CEO is responsible for the ongoing management of the Group following the Board's guidelines and instructions. He is responsible for ensuring that the organization works towards achieveing the goals for sustaina-
The business areas are responsible for developing their respective operations by implementing and following up on strategies and objectives to achieve sustainable, profitable development.
The divisions are separate operational units, each responsible for delivering results in line with the strategies and objectives set by the business area. Each division has global responsibility for a specific product or service offering. A division can have one or more product companies (units responsible for product development, manufacturing and product marketing) and has several customer centers (units responsible for customer contacts, sales and service) dedicated or shared with other divisions.
Creating value for all stakeholders
The goals that were introduced in 2011 all aim at continuously delivering sustainable, profitable development. By integrating sustainability into Atlas Copco's customer-focused and operational goals, Atlas Copco can reduce costs, mitigate risks and create business opportunities. The Group creates a positive impact on society and the environment, which in turn positively affects Atlas Copco's financial bottom line – thus, creating shared value. Atlas Copco uses this win-win concept to increase sales, make sound investments and generate economic value.
Goals for sustainable, profitable development
| The customer focused goals will safeguard market expansion as well as customer satis faction and loyalty. Atlas |
Products, services and solutions |
First in Mind—First in Choice® for customers and prospects for all brands. |
Increase customer loyalty. |
Increase customer energy efficiency by 20% by 2020*. |
Offer safe and reliable products and services. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copco delivers energy efficient, productive, safe and reliable products and solutions through innovation and continuous improvement. |
First in Mind—First in Choice® employer for current and future employees. |
Competence development to achieve good results and yearly coaching/ appraisals for all employees. |
Increase diversity in both gender and nationality. Encourage internal mobility. |
Safe and healthy working environment for all employees. Zero work-related accidents. Sick leave below 2.5%. |
|
| The goals for operations focus on people management, environ mental achievements, |
Operations | No corruption or bribes. |
Work with business partners committed to high ethical, environmental and social standards. |
Develop new products and services with a life cycle perspective. |
Construct Atlas Copco buildings according to sustainable building standards. |
| health and safety, and on business ethics and integrity. |
Decrease CO2 emissions from operations by 20% in relation to cost of sales by 2020*. |
Decrease CO2 emissions from transport of goods by 20% in relation to cost of sales by 2020*. |
Keep water consumption at current level. |
Reuse or recycle waste. |
|
| The financial goals aim to support increased economic value creation. |
Financials | Annual revenue growth of 8% over a business cycle. |
Sustained high return on capital employed. |
All acquired businesses to contribute to economic value added. |
Annual dividend distribution about 50% of earnings per share. |
* Base year 2010
Revenue growth, average
The Group's goal for annual revenue growth is 8%, measured over a business cycle. At the same time the ambition is to grow faster than the most important competitors. Growth should primarily be organic, supported by selective acquisitions.
Return on capital employed, average Dividend/earnings per share, average
The Group's goal is to continue to deliver high return on capital employed, by constantly striving for operational excellence and generating growth. All acquired businesses are expected to make a positive contribution to economic value added (i.e. a return on capital employed above the Group's weighted average cost of capital).
Atlas Copco aims to have a strong but also costefficient financing of the business. The priority for the use of capital is to develop and grow the business. The strong profitability and cash generation allow the Group to do that and at the same time have the ambition to distribute about 50% of earnings as dividends to shareholders.
People
Atlas Copco's growth is closely related to how the Group succeeds in being a good employer, attracting, developing, and keeping qualified and motivated people. With a global business conducted through numerous companies, Atlas Copco works with continuous competence development, knowledge sharing and in implementing the core values: interaction, commitment, and innovation. All employees are expected to contribute by committing themselves to Group goals and to their individual performance targets. Atlas Copco's definition of good leadership is the ability to create lasting results.
Processes
Group-wide strategies, processes, and shared best practices are collected in the database The Way We Do Things. The processes covered are governance, safety, health, environment and quality, accounting and business control, treasury, tax, audit and internal control, information technology, people management, legal, communications and branding, crisis management, administrative services, insurance, Group standards and acquisitions. The information is stored electronically and is available to all employees. Although most of the documentation is self-explanatory, training on how to implement the processes is provided to managers on a regular basis. Wherever they are located, Atlas Copco employees are expected to operate in accordance with the principles and guidelines provided.
The Atlas Copco core values – interaction, commitment, and innovation – are reflected in how we behave internally and in our relationships with external stakeholders.
We are committed to sustainable productivity which means that we do everything we can to ensure reliable, lasting results with responsible use of resources – human, natural and capital.
The Group operates worldwide with a long-term commitment to our customers in each country and market served. As a customer-centric organization, we interact with and develop close relationships with customers in order to be able to meet and exceed their expectations.
Interaction with customers and end-users is conducted in many different ways and through many different channels. However, we believe that personal contacts are always the most important.
Customers expect the best from Atlas Copco and our objective is to consistently deliver high-quality products and services that contribute to our customers' productivity and prosperity.
The innovative spirit of the Atlas Copco Group should be reflected in everything we do. We believe that there is always a better way to do things.
Core values The Atlas Copco Group is unified and strengthened through:
A shared vision and a common identity
The sharing of brand names and trademarks
The sharing of resources and infrastructure
Common processes and shared best practices collected in The Way We Do Things
Shared financial and human resources, and their free mobility
The corporate culture and the core values: interaction, commitment, and innovation
A common leadership model
Common service providers
Stakeholders
Atlas Copco's ambitions towards its stakeholders play an important role in shaping the corporate strategy along with its resources and capabilities. The Group gathers continuous feedback and input through stakeholder dialogues, which are held both on a local and a corporate level. Atlas Copco's stakeholders directly and indirectly influence our business. The Group aims to be transparent and strives to address the concerns of every stakeholder to the best of its ability.
Customers
Atlas Copco operates worldwide with a long-term commitment to contribute to customers' success. The interaction and close relationship with customers is key to gaining valuable input for the development of products, services and solutions that help improve customers' productivity in a sustainable way.
• Other companies/ industries
Employees
Atlas Copco strives to recruit, retain and develop a diverse pool of talented professionals. The Group is committed to providing a safe and healthy work environment that helps employees develop their careers and skills. Atlas Copco encourages employees to interact within the Group. Atlas Copco also interacts with potential future employees through job fairs at universities and technical institutes, as well as encouraging thesis projects and internships.
• Labor unions
• Universities
Business partners
Atlas Copco works closely with its business partners, such as suppliers and distributors, and shares its knowledge and experience. The interaction contributes to product and service development and improved processes and logistics. It is crucial that business partners share the values of Atlas Copco and act in an environmentally and socially responsible manner, as outlined in the Business Code of Practice.
• Trade organizations
• Media • Analysts and rating institutes
- • Governmental organizations
- • Non-governmental organizations
Society and environment
Atlas Copco values discussions with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), governmental organizations (GOs) and other influencers, with whom it can have constructive dialogues regarding its strategy for sustainable productivity. The Group holds regular meetings with Amnesty International, Transparency International and the UN Global Compact Nordic Network, among others, for this purpose. These discussions help Atlas Copco improve its sustainability performance and allow the Group to compare performance with other leading multinational companies.
Shareholders The Group regularly communicates with shareholders, debt investors and other participants in the capital markets, e.g. through the annual general meeting, quarterly reports, capital markets days and other meetings. The objective is to communicate the strategy to generate more economic value over time in a sustainable way. Many investors believe that leading sustainable corporations can create significant long-term value through innovation, attracting and keeping the best people, and being customers' first choice.
Vision Become and remain First in Mind—First in Choice® for customers and other principal stakeholders
Stakeholder Customers
To be the preferred supplier to current and potential customers by developing, manufacturing and delivering productive, reliable and sustainable solutions.
Employees To attract, keep and develop talent within the organization and offer all employees a safe, healthy, ethical and diverse working environment.
Business partners To be the preferred associate for suppliers, distributors, and other business partners with strong business ethics and shared values.
Society and
environment To be a good corporate citizen with strong values and maximize the positive impact of our operations.
Shareholders
To generate more economic value by focusing on growth while maintaining strong profitability and continuously improving efficiency.
This is how we do business
Atlas Copco is characterized by focused businesses, a global presence with direct sales and service, a strong, stable and growing service business, professional people, and an asset-light and flexible manufacturing setup. Atlas Copco is committed to sustainable productivity, which means that we do everything we can to ensure reliable, lasting results with responsible use of resources – human, natural and capital.
Why service?
- Closer relations with customers
- Increased customer satisfaction as service contributes to increased productivity
- Stable revenues
- Optimized business processes
- Enhanced product development
- High growth potential
Sales and service
Customer centricity is a guiding principle for Atlas Copco. The ambition is to have close relationships with customers and to help them increase their productivity in a sustainable way. Sales and service is primarily direct, but complemented by alternative sales channels, e.g. through distributors, to maximize presence in the market. The Group has sales in more than 170 countries and about 80% of sales is made directly to the end user.
Sales of equipment are performed by engineers with strong application knowledge that has the ambition to offer the best solution for the customer's specific application. The offer also includes service and maintenance performed by technicians. Service is the responsibility of dedicated organizations in each business area. The responsibility includes development of service products, sales and marketing, technical support as well as service delivery and follow-up.
Stable service business
Approximately 40 % of revenues is generated from service (spare parts, maintenance, repairs, consumables, accessories, and rental). These revenues are more stable than equipment sales and provide a strong base for the business.
Manufacturing and logistics
The manufacturing philosophy is to design and manufacture in-house those components that are critical for the performance of the equipment. For non-critical components, Atlas Copco leverages the capacity and the competence of business partners and cooperates with them to continuously achieve product and process improvements. Approximately 75% of the production cost of equipment represents purchased components and about 25% are internally manufactured core components, assembly costs and overhead.
Equipment represents approximately 60% of revenues and Atlas Copco has organized its manufacturing and logistics to be able to quickly adapt to changes in equipment demand. The manufacturing of equipment is primarily based on customer orders and only some standard, high volume equipment is manufactured based on projected demand.
The assembly of the equipment is to a large degree carried out in own facilities. The assembly is typically lean and flow oriented and the final product is normally shipped directly to the end user. The organization works continuously to use human, natural or capital resources more efficiently.
Agile and resilient operations
Innovation
Atlas Copco believes that there is always a better way of doing things. Innovation and product development are very important for the Group. A key activity is to design new or improved products that provide tangible benefits in terms of productivity, energy efficiency and/or life cycle cost to the customer and, at the same time, can be efficiently produced. Atlas Copco protects technical innovations with patents.
Innovation also includes better processes to improve the flow and utilization of assets and information. Innovation will improve customer satisfaction and contribute to strengthening customer relations, the brand, as well as financial performance. Overcapacities and waste must always be challenged.
Investments in fixed assets and working capital
The investments in property, plant and equipment are moderate and can be adapted in the short and medium term to changes in demand. Most investments are related to machining equipment for core manufacturing activities and to production facilities, primarily for core component manufacturing and for assembly operations.
The working capital requirements of the Group are affected by the direct sales and service model, which requires a certain amount of inventory and receivables, as well as by the manufacturing philosophy, which in contrast, is very lean in capital. In an improving business climate with higher volumes, more working capital will be tied up. If the business climate deteriorates, working capital will be released.
Acquisitions
Acquisitions are primarily done in, or very close to, the already existing core businesses. All divisions are required to map and evaluate businesses that are adjacent and can offer tangible synergies with the existing businesses. All acquired businesses are expected to make a positive contribution to economic value added.
Human capital
Atlas Copco strives to be a good employer to attract, develop, and keep qualified and motivated people. Employees are responsible for their professional career and supported by continuous competence development and an internal job market. Employees are encouraged to grow professionally and take up new positions.
If the company needs to adapt capacity in a deteriorating business climate, the first resort is to stop recruitment. Layoffs are the last resort and, if necessary, Atlas Copco will provide support for the employees.
The Business Code of Practice
The internal policy documents related to business ethics and social and environmental performance are summarized in the Atlas Copco Business Code of Practice. All employees and managers in Group companies, as well as business partners, are expected to adhere to these policies. The Business Code of Practice is based
on the UN Bill of Human Rights, the International Labour Organization Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the United Nations Global Compact (UN GC), and OECD's Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Since 2008, Atlas Copco has been a signatory to the UN GC principles on human rights, labor, the environment and anti-corruption. In 2011, the Group began the process to adopt the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Atlas Copco follows both local and international rules (US OFAC, UN and EU) and regulations regarding trading in high-risk countries.
To make it accessible to all employees, the Business Code of Practice has been translated into 26 languages. Through its annual training and compliance process, Atlas Copco ensures that all managers will act in accordance with high ethical standards outlined in the Business Code of Practice. It also means that the managers can provide support and guidance to their organizations and to local external stakeholders.
Equipment, 60% Industry Industrial machinery investment Mining machinery investment Industrial production Construction Metal and ore production Construction Mining Service, 40%
Primary drivers of revenues
Investments in equipment in various private and public sectors, such as manufacturing, infrastructure, and mining, are drivers for Atlas Copco's revenues. Important customer groups in manufacturing and process industries demand and invest in compressed air products and solutions, industrial tools and assembly systems. Such industrial machinery investments are influenced by customers' ambitions to increase capacity, reduce cost, and improve productivity and quality. Customers in the construction and mining industries invest in equipment, e.g. for rock excavation, demolition and road construction. Large infrastructure investments, such as tunnel construction for roads, railways and hydroelectric power plants often depend on political decisions. Private investments in the construction and mining industries can be influenced by a number of factors, e.g. underlying construction activity, interest rates, metal prices, and metal inventory levels.
There is also demand for service – spare parts, maintenance, repairs, consumables, accessories and rental. The demand arises during the time the equipment is in use, i.e. during industrial production, construction activity and ore production. Additionally, there is an outsourcing trend that is driving demand as customers increasingly look for suppliers that can perform additional services. Demand for service is relatively stable compared to the demand for equipment.
The year in review
The year in review highlights Atlas Copco's performance during 2012 in the economic, social and environmental areas related to the Group's goals for sustainable, profitable development. This part of the annual report includes the administration report (pages 13–44), financial, sustainability and corporate governance information. The year in review is intended to address the information requirements of all stakeholders of the Group. In the table below, the main issues raised by our stakeholders are summarized, together with performance and comments.
| Stakeholder | Stakeholder views | Performance 2012 | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Work to fight corruption. | 3 500 managers signed off compliance to the Business Code of Practice and were trained on corruption. |
The yearly process for managers to sign off compliance to the Business Code of Practice is continuing and is combined with awareness training. |
|
| Society and the |
Raise human rights awareness. | The Business Code of Practice is updated with the UN Guiding Principles on Human Rights. A Human Rights Statement was published on the Atlas Copco website. |
The UN Guiding Principles on Human Rights and the UN Global Compact Children Rights are implemented in the Code and in guidelines at Group level. The awareness training will be conducted in 2013. |
| environment | Reduce environmental impact from operations. |
9% decrease of energy consumption in relation to cost of sales (/COS) 1) and 24%/COS decrease of CO2 emissions in production. 9%/COS decrease of water consumption. 3%/COS increase of waste. |
Energy and related CO2 emissions depend on investments in new efficient heating equipment and more use of renewable energy. Water is used for non-production related activities. Waste is reused to a large extent. |
| Further increase the energy efficiency of products and solutions. |
Launch of more energy-efficient products and services. | The work to develop and launch energy-efficient products and solutions is continuing and crucial for sustainable profitable growth. |
|
| Customers | Increase customer risk awareness in countries with weak governments 2). |
The tool to increase awareness of customer sustainability performance was further developed and tested. |
The customer sustainability assessment tool was further discussed, developed and tested during the year. The tools will be rolled out in 2013. |
| Employees | Continue to offer a safe and healthy workplace in all operations. |
5.4 (5.7) accidents/one million working hours and 23.4 (22.8) incidents/one million working hours. During the year there were three fatal accidents. Sick leave at 2.1% (2.0). |
The rate of accidents has slightly decreased due to increased focus on safety. Reporting on incidents is new but will lead to improved safety. The unfortunate fatalities are addressed. Sick-leave is at a stable low level. |
| Improve diversity in gender and nationality. |
Proportion of female managers increased to 15.1% (14.6). 49 (44) nationalities among senior managers. |
Several years of the female mentorship program have resulted in an increased number of female managers. |
|
| Business partners |
Work with ensuring a sustainable supply chain and set a clear goal on the work. |
16% of the significant suppliers evaluated during the year on sustainability aspects. |
The work to safeguard a sustainable supply chain is in focus. Long-term relations and close cooperation give opportunities for improvements. |
| Shareholders | Improve the sustainability performance and the reporting on goals' achievement. |
Clear follow-up on Group goals. The sustainability information in the annual report is reviewed by Deloitte for limited assurance. |
In this report performance versus goals, including analysis is reported on. It is also available on the Atlas Copco website. |
| Economic value creation. | The value creation improved versus 2011 due to record revenues and sustained high return on capital employed. |
Increased emphasis on shared value creation and sustainability in shareholders meetings. |
Main issues raised in stakeholder dialogues
1) Cost of sales when presented in relation to sustainability information refers to cost of sales at standard cost for the Group. 2) OECD definition.
Atlas Copco Group
Atlas Copco is an industrial group with world-leading positions in compressors, expanders and air treatment systems, construction and mining equipment, power tools and assembly systems. With innovative products and services, Atlas Copco delivers solutions for sustainable productivity. The company was founded in 1873, is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and has a global reach spanning more than 170 countries. In 2012, Atlas Copco had 39 800 employees and revenues of BSEK 90.5 (BEUR 10.5).
The Compressor Technique business area provides industrial compressors, gas and process compressors and expanders, air and gas treatment equipment and air management systems. It has a global service network and offers specialty rental services. Compressor Technique innovates for sustainable productivity in the manufacturing, oil and gas, and process industries. Principal product development and manufacturing units are located in Belgium, Germany, the United States, China and India. 0
Industrial Technique
The Industrial Technique business area provides industrial power tools, assembly systems, quality assurance products, software and services through a global network. It innovates for sustainable productivity for customers in the automotive and aerospace industries, industrial manufacturing and maintenance, and in vehicle service. Principal product development and manufacturing units are located in Sweden, France, Japan and Germany.
Mining and Rock
business area provides equipment for drilling and rock excavation, a complete range of related consumables and service through a global network. The business area innovates for sustainable productivity in surface and underground mining, infrastructure, civil works, well drilling and geotechnical applications. Principal product development and manufacturing units are located in Sweden, the United States, Canada, China and India.
Construction Technique
The Construction Technique business area provides construction and demolition tools, portable compressors, pumps and generators, lighting towers, and compaction and paving equipment. It offers service through a global network. Construction Technique innovates for sustainable productivity in infrastructure, civil works and road construction projects. Principal product development and manufacturing units are located in Belgium, Germany, Sweden, China and Brazil.
Market review and demand development
The overall demand for Atlas Copco's products and services remained at a good level. Orders received increased 4% to a record MSEK 90 570 (86 955), corresponding to 2% organic growth. The positive development for the service business (spare parts, maintenance, repairs, consumables, accessories and rental) continued and strong growth was achieved in all business areas. The order intake for equipment, however, decreased somewhat compared to 2011 as customers became more cautious to invest in capital equipment, particularly in the latter part of the year. The order intake of small and medium sized compressors to the manufacturing industry was stable, while orders for large machines for the process industry decreased moderately. Order intake for industrial tools and assembly systems from the motor vehicle, electronics and aerospace industry continued to increase, while it decreased from most other customer groups. The mining industry continued to invest in new equipment, but the order intake did not reach the high level of the previous year. The demand for construction equipment for infrastructure and civil engineering work was, with few exceptions, weak. See also business area sections on pages 20–35.
North America
The order intake increased 4% in local currencies in North America, with the best development in the United States. Growth was achieved for most types of equipment, e.g. industrial compressors, gas and process compressors, industrial tools, and construction equipment, while the orders for mining equipment decreased. The activity level remained high in most customer segments and the service business grew strongly. North America accounted for 20% (19) of orders received.
South America
South America orders grew by 13% in local currencies. All business areas achieved growth with the best development in Mining and Rock Excavation Technique, supported by some large orders. South America accounted for 11% (10) of orders received.
Europe
The demand in Europe was somewhat mixed with a stable level of demand in e.g. Germany, the United Kingdom and the Nordic countries. The southern parts, however, were influenced by the debt crises and the order volumes for equipment decreased in markets like Italy and Spain. The orders received of industrial tools and compressors to manufacturing and process industries had a good development, with strong demand from the motor vehicle industry. Mining and construction equipment, however, had a negative development in most major markets. The service business achieved healthy growth and the order intake was also supported by acquisitions. In total, orders increased 1% in local currencies. Europe accounted for 29% (31) of orders received.
Africa/Middle East
The Africa/Middle East region accounted for 11% (11) of orders received and achieved a growth of 9% in local currencies. The main contributor was a positive development for mining and construction equipment in nearly all markets in the region.
Asia/Australia
Orders received increased 2% in local currencies in Asia/Australia. The positive contribution came from Australia, where the order intake from the mining industry was strong, and from South Korea, India and in Southast Asia. The order intake decreased in China, where the weak development of construction equipment and industrial compressors was only partly offset by increased orders for industrial tools and mining equipment. The Asia/ Australia region accounted for 29% (29) of orders received.
Near-term demand outlook, Published January 31, 2013
The overall demand for Atlas Copco's products and services is expected to decrease somewhat.
| Sales bridge | Atlas Copco Group |
Compressor Technique |
Industrial Technique |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orders received | Orders on hand December 31 |
Revenues | Orders received | Revenues | Orders received | Revenues | ||
| 2010 | 75 178 | 18 677 | 69 875 | 29 966 | 29 753 | 6 730 | 6 472 | |
| Structural change, % | +2 | +2 | +3 | +3 | +5 | +6 | ||
| Currency, % | –8 | –8 | –9 | –8 | –9 | –9 | ||
| Price, % | +2 | +2 | +1 | +1 | +2 | +2 | ||
| Volume, % | +20 | +20 | +21 | +11 | +28 | +22 | ||
| Total, % | +16 | +16 | +16 | +7 | +26 | +21 | ||
| 2011 | 86 955 | 24 714 | 81 203 | 34 664 | 31 760 | 8 462 | 7 821 | |
| Structural change, % | +2 | +2 | +2 | +2 | +10 | +11 | ||
| Currency, % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | –1 | –1 | ||
| Price, % | +2 | +2 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | ||
| Volume, % | 0 | +7 | –1 | +6 | +1 | +11 | ||
| Total, % | +4 | +11 | +2 | +9 | +11 | +22 | ||
| 2012 | 90 570 | 24 020 | 90 533 | 35 469 | 34 714 | 9 435 | 9 566 |
important events
Market presence
To strengthen the local presence and increase the offering of products and services in Africa, Atlas Copco opened customer centers in Mozambique, Senegal and in Burkina Faso in 2012.
Atlas Copco had own customer centers in 89 (86) countries and production facilities in 22 (21) countries on five continents at the end of the year. Revenues were reported in 176 (176) countries.
Investments in manufacturing
Two facilities to expand the capacity to assemble portable and industrial compressors were built in China and India with the investments amounting to MSEK 150 and MSEK 160, respectively. The facilities will be inaugurated in the beginning of 2013. In Fagersta, Sweden, the largest investment project ever in Atlas Copco's history continued during the year. The investment totaling approximately MSEK 450 will increase the production capacity of rock drilling tools and will be finalized during 2013.
Acquisitions
The Group completed nine acquisitions during the year. The acquisitions added net revenues of MSEK 803 in 2012. See also note 2 and business area sections on pages 20–35.
Adaptation of capacity and reorganization of production
The demand from many customer segments weakened in the second half of the year, which led to actions to adapt the capacity to the level of demand. In Örebro, Sweden, where mining and rock excavation equipment is manufactured, for example, 135 employees received final notice in January 2013.
In addition, several initiatives were taken to reorganize production to create more competitive production units with stronger future growth potential. The production unit for road construction equipment in Karlskrona, Sweden, for example, plans to invest MSEK 30, but also to reduce the workforce. Final notice was given to 78 blue collar employees at the end of September.
| Construction Technique |
Mining and Rock Excavation Technique |
|
|---|---|---|
| Orders received Revenues |
Revenues | Orders received |
| 12 534 11 485 |
22 520 | 26 356 |
| +1 | +1 | 0 |
| –7 | –9 | –8 |
| +1 | +2 | +3 |
| +7 +17 |
+36 | +25 |
| +2 +12 |
+30 | +20 |
| 12 786 12 918 |
29 356 | 31 751 |
| +2 | +1 | +1 |
| –1 | +1 | 0 |
| +2 | +3 | +3 |
| –1 | +11 | +1 |
| +2 | +16 | +5 |
| 13 001 12 888 |
34 054 | 33 482 |
Divestment of financial assets
A portfolio of financing and leasing contracts, related to customer financing, was sold. The value of the portfolio amounted to MSEK 1 400, and a gain of approximately MSEK 100 related to the transaction was reported.
Employee survey
In the 2012 employee survey more than 32 000 employees replied, 85% of all employees. The survey showed that the share of employees that are proud to work for Atlas Copco increased by five percentage points to 82%. This was a significant improvement compared with the previous survey held in 2010. See page 42.
Certifications on quality, environment, health and safety
In September, Atlas Copco decided that all product companies, as well as all sites with 70 or more employees shall have ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certifications by the end of 2013.
Recognitions
Atlas Copco achieved the following recognitions
- • Inclusion in 2012/2013 Dow Jones Sustainability World Index and FTSE4Good.
- • One of 100 most innovative companies in the world by Forbes.
- • Ranked among world's top sustainable companies by Global 100.
Changes in Group Management
Atlas Copco appointed Håkan Osvald Senior Vice President General Counsel and member of Group Management as from January 1, 2012. He succeeded Hans Sandberg, who retired.
Geographic distribution of orders received, by business area, %
| Europe Africa/Middle East Asia/Australia |
33 9 32 |
46 1 21 |
19 17 29 |
34 13 25 |
29 11 29 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South America | 7 | 6 | 15 | 12 | 11 |
| North America | 19 | 26 | 20 | 16 | 20 |
| Compressor Technique |
Industrial Technique |
Mining and Rock Excavation Technique |
Construction Technique |
Atlas Copco Group |
Orders received, by customer category, %
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 9 | 2 | 12 | 7 |
| Service | 12 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Mining | 8 | 0 | 69 | 8 | 30 |
| Process industry | 25 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| Manufacturing | 37 | 87 | 0 | 11 | 25 |
| Construction | 9 | 1 | 28 | 62 | 22 |
| Compressor Technique |
Industrial Technique |
Mining and Rock Excavation Technique |
Construction Technique |
Atlas Copco Group |
Customers are classified according to standard industry classification systems. The classification does not always reflect the industry of the end user.
Financial summary and analysis
Key financial data
| MSEK | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Orders received | 90 570 | 86 955 |
| Revenues | 90 533 | 81 203 |
| EBITDA | 21 892 | 20 082 |
| Operating profit | 19 228 | 17 560 |
| – in % of revenues | 21.2 | 21.6 |
| Profit before tax | 18 538 | 17 276 |
| – in % of revenues | 20.5 | 21.3 |
| Profit for the year | 13 914 | 12 988 |
| Basic earnings per share, SEK | 11.45 | 10.68 |
| Diluted earnings per share, SEK | 11.43 | 10.62 |
Revenues
The Group's revenues increased by 11% to a record MSEK 90 533 (81 203). The Group goal is annual revenue growth of 8% over a business cycle. In the past 10 years, revenue growth has averaged 7%. If the divested businesses related to professional electric tools and equipment rental are excluded, the annual revenue growth has averaged approximately 12%.
Operating profit
Operating profit increased by 9%, to a record MSEK 19 228 (17 560), corresponding to a margin of 21.2% (21.6). Items affecting comparability, including effects from share-related long-term incentive programs, were MSEK –182 (–160) and the adjusted operating margin was 21.4% (21.8). The margin was positively affected by increased volume, higher prices, and currency effects, but this effect was more than offset by investments in the organization, a negative product mix and dilution from acquisitions.
Operating profit for the Compressor Technique business area increased by 6% to MSEK 8 017 (7 592), corresponding to a margin of 23.1% (23.9). The margin benefited from volume, price and currency, but these were more than offset by a negative product mix, higher costs for marketing and product development as well as dilution from acquisitions.
Operating profit for the Industrial Technique business area increased by 22% to MSEK 2 155 (1 767), corresponding to a margin of 22.5% (22.6). Higher volumes affected the profit and margin positively, while the currency effect was negative.
Operating profit for the Mining and Rock Excavation Technique business area increased by 16% to MSEK 8 315 (7 196), corresponding to a margin of 24.4% (24.5). The margin was supported by increased volumes, but it was negatively affected by revenue mix and dilution from acquisitions.
Operating profit for the Construction Technique business area decreased 9% to MSEK 1 326 (1 460), corresponding to a margin of 10.3% (11.3). Restructuring costs and other items affecting comparability were MSEK –65 (–105) and the adjusted operating margin was 10.8% (12.1).
Costs for common group functions and eliminations increased to MSEK –585 (–455), including a gain of MSEK 100 from sales of assets in the customer financing portfolio and an effect from the provision for share-related long-term incentive programs of MSEK –217 (–5). Previous year included restructuring costs of MSEK –50 related to outsourcing of administrative and financial processes.
Depreciation and EBITDA
Depreciation and amortization was MSEK 2 664 (2 522). Earnings before depreciation and amortization, EBITDA, was MSEK 21 892 (20 082), corresponding to a margin of 24.2% (24.7).
Net financial items
The Group's net financial items totaled MSEK –690 (–284). The net interest expense increased to MSEK –644 (–506). Other financial items were MSEK –46 (+222). Previous year include a capital gain of MSEK 350 from the sale of all remaining shares in RSC Holdings Inc. See also note 9 and 27.
Profit before tax
Profit before tax increased by 7% to MSEK 18 538 (17 276), corresponding to a profit margin of 20.5% (21.3).
Bridge – revenues and operating profit
| Volume, price, mix |
Restructuring and capital |
Share based long term incentive |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSEK | 2012 | and other | Currency | Acquisitions | gain | programs | 2011 |
| Revenues | 90 533 | +7 255 | +60 | +2 030 | – | – | 81 203 |
| Operating profit | 19 228 | +1 315 | +250 | +135 | +190 | –212 | 17 560 |
| Effect on margin, % | 21.2 | –0.3 | +0.2 | –0.3 | +0.2 | –0.2 | 21.6 |
The operating margin decreased to 21.2% (21.6). It was negatively affected by the net effect of volume, price, mix and operational costs and dilution from acquisitions, but it was supported by currency. The effect from items affecting comparability was neutral.
| Revenues | Operating profit |
Operating margin, % |
Return on capital employed, % |
Investments in tangible fixed assets1) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSEK | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 |
| Compressor Technique | 34 714 | 31 760 | 8 017 | 7 592 | 23.1 | 23.9 | 62 | 70 | 987 | 992 |
| Industrial Technique | 9 566 | 7 821 | 2 155 | 1 767 | 22.5 | 22.6 | 43 | 55 | 170 | 155 |
| Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 34 054 | 29 356 | 8 315 | 7 196 | 24.4 | 24.5 | 59 | 66 | 1 298 | 1 294 |
| Construction Technique | 12 888 | 12 918 | 1 326 | 1 460 | 10.3 | 11.3 | 10 | 12 | 286 | 150 |
| Common Group functions/eliminations | –689 | –652 | –585 | –455 | 230 | 469 | ||||
| Total Group | 90 533 | 81 203 | 19 228 | 17 560 | 21.2 | 21.6 | 36 | 37 | 2 971 | 3 060 |
1) Excluding assets leased.
Taxes
Taxes for the year totaled MSEK 4 624 (4 288), corresponding to an effective tax rate of 24.9% (24.8) in relation to profit before tax. See also note 10.
Profit and earnings per share
Profit for the year increased by 7% to MSEK 13 914 (12 988), whereof MSEK 13 901 (12 963) and MSEK 13 (25) attributable to owners of the parent and non-controlling interests, respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per share were SEK 11.45 (10.68) and SEK 11.43 (10.62), respectively.
Balance sheet
Balance sheet in summary
| MSEK | December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 15 879 | 20% | 15 352 | 21% |
| Rental equipment | 2 030 | 2% | 2 117 | 3% |
| Other property, plant and equipment |
6 846 | 8% | 6 538 | 9% |
| Other fixed assets | 3 836 | 5% | 3 983 | 5% |
| Inventories | 17 653 | 22% | 17 579 | 23% |
| Receivables | 21 155 | 26% | 21 996 | 29% |
| Current financial assets | 1 333 | 2% | 1 773 | 2% |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 12 416 | 15% | 5 716 | 8% |
| Assets classified as held for sale |
1 | 0% | 55 | 0% |
| Total assets | 81 149 | 100% | 75 109 | 100% |
| Total equity | 35 132 | 43% | 28 839 | 38% |
| Interest-bearing liabilities | 22 453 | 28% | 21 939 | 29% |
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities |
23 564 | 29% | 24 331 | 33% |
| Total equity and liabilities | 81 149 | 100% | 75 109 | 100% |
The Group's total assets increased 8% to MSEK 81 149 (75 109). Currency translation effects were –4% and the effect from the increase of cash, cash equivalents and other current financial assets was +8%. Excluding these effects, assets increased approximately 2% for comparable units. This is partly due to investments in property, plant and equipment and partly due to higher requirements for working capital. Acquisitions added approximately 2% to the assets.
Equity
| MSEK | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Opening balance | 28 839 | 29 321 |
| Profit for the year | 13 914 | 12 988 |
| Other comprehensive income for the year | –1 559 | –505 |
| Shareholders' transactions | –6 062 | –12 965 |
| Closing balance | 35 132 | 28 839 |
| Equity attributable to | ||
| – owners of the parent | 35 078 | 28 776 |
| – non-controlling interests | 54 | 63 |
At year end, Group equity including non-controlling interests was MSEK 35 132 (28 839). Other comprehensive income for the year was MSEK –1 559 (–505), see page 66 and note 10. Shareholders' transactions include dividends and redemption of shares of MSEK –6 070 (–10 920) in total, sales and repurchases of own shares of net MSEK +271 (–1 005), acquisition of non-controlling interest in Atlas Copco (India) Ltd. of MSEK –107 (–991) and share based payments of net MSEK –156 (–49).
Equity per share was SEK 29 (24). Equity accounted for 43% (38) of total assets. Atlas Copco's market capitalization, excluding shares held by the company, at year end was MSEK 208 526 (172 630), or 594% (599) of net book value. The information related to public takeover bids given for the Parent Company, on page 19, is also valid for the Group.
Interest-bearing debt and net indebtedness
Total interest-bearing debt were MSEK 22 453 (21 939), whereof post-employment benefits MSEK 1 401 (1 504). The Group has an average maturity of 4.3 years on interest bearing liabilities. See notes 21 and 23 for additional information.
The Group's net indebtedness, adjusted with MSEK –190 (–256) for the fair value of related interest rate swaps, amounted to MSEK 8 514 (14 194) at year end. The net debt/EBITDA ratio was 0.4 (0.7) and the debt/equity ratio was 24% (49).
Credit rating
Atlas Copco's long-term and short-term debt is rated by Moody's and Standard & Poor's with the long-/short-term rating A2/P1 and A/A1, respectively. Moody's upgraded Atlas Copco in 2012.
Operating cash flow and investments
Operating cash surplus reached MSEK 21 583 (19 906). The working capital increased by MSEK 1 366 (6 115) and the rental equipment increased MSEK 749 (788). Net cash from operating activities amounted to MSEK 13 823 (8 421).
Net investments in property, plant and equipment were MSEK –1 605 (–1 676), 143% (169) of annual depreciation. Notable investments were made by Compressor Technique in China, Belgium, the United States, India and Germany, by Industrial Technique's in Sweden, by Mining and Rock Excavation Technique in Sweden, the United States, China, Canada and Australia and by Construction Technique in China, Germany, Sweden and India.
Net investments in intangible fixed assets, mainly related to capitalization of development expenditures, were MSEK –913 (–607).
Cash flow from other investments were MSEK +928 (+154). This includes a divestment of a portfolio of financing and leasing contracts for MSEK 1 400. Previous year, all remaining shares in RSC Holdings Inc. were sold for MSEK 591. Adjusted for these transactions, other investments were MSEK –472 (–437), mostly related to customer financing activities.
Operating cash flow was MSEK 12 233 (6 292), equal to 14% (8) of Group revenues.
The net cash flow from acquisitions and divestments in subsidiaries decreased, and amounted to MSEK –1 195 (–2 206).
Cash flow from financing
Dividends paid amounted to MSEK 6 070 (4 853) and the mandatory redemption of shares performed previous year was MSEK 6 067. Sales and repurchases of own shares equaled net MSEK +271 (–1 005). Acquisition of non-controlling interest in Atlas Copco (India) Ltd. amounted to MSEK –107 (–991).
A 7-year bond loan of MEUR 500 was issued and a 7-year MEUR 275 loan from the European Investment Bank was taken. Part of the proceeds were used to repurchase MEUR 255, nominal, of a bond loan with maturity in 2014 and to repay a loan of MSEK 2 540. These items are included under change in interestbearing liabilities, which amounted to MSEK 1 636 (181).
Working capital ratios
The ratio of inventories to revenues at year end was 19.5% (21.6) and trade receivables was 17.6% (20.7). The corresponding average ratios were 20.3% (19.0) and 18.6% (18.3), respectively. Higher average inventories in relation to revenues compared to the previous year is primarily due to strong growth in the mining business, which has a higher inventory ratio than the Group average. Average trade payables in relation to revenues were 8.2% (8.8).
Capital turnover
The capital turnover ratio was 1.15 (1.14) and the capital employed turnover ratio was 1.66 (1.65).
Return on capital employed and return on equity
Return on capital employed was 35.7% (37.2) and the return on equity 44.5% (47.6). The Group uses a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 8% (8) as an investment and overall performance benchmark.
Personnel
In 2012, the average number of employees in the Atlas Copco Group increased by 3 982 to 39 113. At year end, the number of employees was 39 811 (37 579) and the number of full-time consultants/external workforce was 2 109 (2 198). For comparable units, the total workforce increased by 1 453. Acquisitions added 690 employees. See also pages 42–44.
| 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|
| 39 113 | 35 131 |
| 4 702 | 4 353 |
| 34 411 | 30 778 |
| 15 471 | 14 187 |
| 4 389 | 3 562 |
| 12 766 | 10 724 |
| 5 101 | 5 339 |
| 1 386 | 1 319 |
Operating cash flow as % of revenues
Capital employed turnover and return
Operating cash flow
Parent Company
Atlas Copco AB is the ultimate Parent Company of the Atlas Copco Group and is headquartered in Nacka, Sweden. Its operations include administrative functions, holding company functions as well as part of Group Treasury.
Earnings
Profit before tax totaled MSEK 3 960 (9 154). Profit for the year amounted to MSEK 3 024 (8 208).
Financing
The total assets of the Parent Company were MSEK 108 741 (104 215). At year end 2012, cash and cash equivalents amounted to MSEK 7 579 (2 788) and interest-bearing liabilities, excluding post-employment benefits, to MSEK 63 485 (57 900), whereof the main part is Group internal loans. Equity represented 38% (42) of total assets and the undistributed earnings totaled MSEK 35 452 (37 510).
Personnel
The average number of employees in the Parent Company was 109 (106).
Fees and other remuneration paid to the Board of Directors, the President and CEO, and other members of Group Management, as well as other statistics and the guidelines regarding remuneration and benefits to the management of the Group as approved by the Annual General Meeting 2012 are specified in note 5.
The Board proposes to the Annual General Meeting 2013 that the same guidelines shall be applied for another year.
Risks and factors of uncertainty
Atlas Copco is subject to currency risks, interest rate risks and other financial risks. Atlas Copco has adopted a policy to control the financial risks to which Atlas Copco AB and the Group are exposed. A financial risk management committee meets regularly to take decisions about how to manage these risks. See also Risks, risk management and opportunities on pages 36–39.
Appropriation of profit
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that a dividend of SEK 5.50 (5.00) per share, equal to MSEK 6 674 (6 058), be paid for the 2012 fiscal year and that the balance of retained earnings after the dividend be retained in the business as described below.
SEK
| Retained earnings including reserve for fair value | 32 427 925 148 |
|---|---|
| Profit for the year | 3 023 927 229 |
| 35 451 852 377 | |
| The Board of Directors proposes that these earnings be appropriated as follows: |
|
| To the shareholders, a dividend of SEK 5.50 per share | 6 673 821 963 |
| To be retained in the business | 28 778 030 414 |
| 35 451 852 377 |
Shares and share capital
At year end, Atlas Copco's share capital totaled MSEK 786 (786) and a total number of 1 229 613 104 shares divided into 839 394 096 class A shares and 390 219 008 class B shares were issued. Net of 15 372 649 class A shares and 818 280 class B shares held by Atlas Copco, 1 213 422 175 shares were outstanding. Class A shares entitle the owner to one vote while class B shares entitle the owner to one tenth of a vote. Investor AB is the single largest shareholder in Atlas Copco AB. At year end 2012 Investor AB held a total of 206 895 611 shares, representing 22.3% of the votes and 16.8% of the capital.
There are no restrictions which prohibit the right to transfer shares of the Company nor is the Company aware of any such agreements. In addition, the Company is not party to any agreement that enters into force or is changed or ceases to be valid if the control of the company is changed as a result of a public takeover bid. There is no limitation on the number of votes that can be cast at a General Meeting of shareholders.
As prescribed by the Articles of Association, the General Meeting has sole authority for the election of Board members, and there are no other rules relating to election or dismissal of Board members or changes in the Articles of Association. Correspondingly, there are no agreements with Board members or employees regarding compensation in case of changes of current position reflecting a public take over bid.
Compressor Technique
The year in review
- ➔ Healthy demand for compressed air solutions
- ➔ Record orders received, revenues and profits
- ➔ Acquisitions of new businesses
Business development
The overall demand for industrial compressors remained at a healthy level. Order volumes were largely unchanged for small and medium-sized compressors, while they were somewhat lower for large machines. Geographically, the highest order growth was achieved in North America. Growth was also achieved in Europe, while order intake decreased in Asia.
The demand for energy-efficient solutions continued to be strong. Sales of air treatment equipment, such as compressed air dryers, coolers and filters, continued to grow, reflecting a continued focus on compressed air quality. Orders received for gas and process compressors and expanders remained at a high level, with strong sales in North America. Significant orders were won in Australia and in the Middle East. Orders received in Asia were, however, significantly below the previous year.
The specialty rental business, primarily rental of oil-free and high-pressure equipment, grew in most markets.
The demand for service continued to develop favorably and further investments were made in the service organization.
Orders received grew in all regions, which contributed to a record order intake both for service and for the total business area.
Market presence and organizational development
To further increase the market presence, the number of employees in sales, service and product development increased during the year. The majority of the new employees were added in Asia.
The Quality Air division, dedicated to air and gas treatment equipment, including the medical air business, became operational as of January 1, 2012.
New compressor manufacturing facilities were constructed in China and India during the year to meet the growing demand for compressors in the region. Both facilities will be fully operational in 2013.
Innovation
Several new products and solutions were introduced, including the following examples:
- • A range of medium-sized compressors. The range comprises of three product platforms and is used by twelve different brands.
- • A range of oil-sealed rotary screw vacuum pumps.
- • A central controller, which can control an entire compressed air network. It can help save, on average, 10% energy.
- • Several nitrogen and oxygen generators for on-site gas generation. With an independent supply of on-site gas, customers can save on operational costs.
- • A redesigned range of filters, which have a much lower pressure drop than their predecessors, leading to substantial energy savings.
Acquisitions
The business area made five acquisitions in 2012:
- • Houston Service Industries, Inc., a U.S. manufacturer of low-pressure blowers and vacuum pumps, with revenues of MSEK 240 and 123 employees.
- • Wuxi Shengda Air and Gas Purity Equipment Co., Ltd., a Chinese manufacturer of compressed air and gas drying and filtration equipment, with revenues of MSEK 85 and 130 employees.
- • Guangzhou Linghein Compressor Co., China, a manufacturer of industrial air compressors with a strong regional presence, with revenues of MSEK 100 and 160 employees.
- • Gazcon A/S, located in Denmark, offering nitrogen and oxygen generators, with revenues of MSEK 30 and 21 employees.
- • Ekomak Group, a Turkish manufacturer of industrial screw compressors, with revenues of MSEK 200 and 160 employees.
Revenues, profits and returns
Revenues reached a record MSEK 34 714 (31 760), corresponding to an organic growth of 7%. Operating profit increased to a record MSEK 8 017 (7 592), corresponding to a margin of 23.1% (23.9). The positive effects on operating margin from higher volumes, price increases and currency effects were more than offset by unfavorable product mix, higher investments in marketing and product development and dilution from acquisitions. The return on capital employed was 62% (70).
Operating profit
Business Area President: Stephan Kuhn
The overall demand for industrial compressed air and gas equipment and services was healthy during 2012. The business area continued to increase market presence, introduce new products and solutions, develop the service business, and invest in competence, capacity and new businesses.
| +9% | +6% | |
|---|---|---|
| Key figures | 2012 | 2011 |
| Orders received | 35 469 | 34 664 |
| Revenues | 34 714 | 31 760 |
| Operating profit | 8 017 | 7 592 |
| Operating margin, % | 23.1 | 23.9 |
| Return on capital employed, % | 62 | 70 |
Revenues
Investments 987 992 Average number of employees 15 471 14 187
... with improved sustainability and reliability
By focusing on improving the key components, the new range of oil-injected compressors feature major performance increases compared to its predecessors. Thanks to improved component lay-out in the canopy, premium efficiency motors, and highly efficient screw elements, performance could be increased with up to 10% at the same time as the reliability was improved.
The compressor can also be fitted with an integrated energy recovery system, which allows for reuse of the hot air and water generated by the compressor. With this system, up to 75% of the energy input can be recovered without any influence on the compressor's performance.
In addition, the optional integrated dryer makes use of a refrigerant that does not contribute to ozone depletion and that reduces the dryer's power consumption by 50%.
A high performer No oil and less energy
... saving up to 35% in energy consumption costs
Princes Gate Spring Water in the United Kingdom has achieved significant energy savings and production improvements at a bottling plant by replacing its oillubricated compressor installation with Atlas Copco oil-free equipment. The compressors provide a guaranteed supply of high-quality air and ensure the purity of its natural water products.
Princes Gate's compressor upgrade was influenced not only by the need for 100% oil-free air, but also for the environmental benefits of lower operational noise levels and elimination of the time and costs involved in the disposal of oil. What's more, the integrated frequency converter feature of the Atlas Copco VSD (variable speed drive) compressors varies the speed of the drive motor to exactly match the changes in compressed air demand, thus using the minimum amount of energy and saving Princes Gate up to 35% in energy consumption costs.
Redesigned, tested and integrated components contribute to sustainable productivity
Revenues and operating margin
The operations
The Compressor Technique business area provides industrial compressors, gas and process compressors and expanders, air and gas treatment equipment and air management systems. It has a global service network and offers specialty rental services. Compressor Technique innovates for sustainable productivity in the manufacturing, oil and gas, and process industries. Principal product development and manufacturing units are located in Belgium, Germany, the United States, China and India.
The divisions
Technique Service President Andrew Walker
President Horst Wasel
President Geert Follens
Specialty Rental President Ray Löfgren
President Chris Lybaert
President Philippe Ernens
Products and applications
Atlas Copco offers all major air compression technologies as well as air and gas treatment equipment and air management systems, and is able to offer customers the best solution for every application.
Stationary industrial compressors are available with engine sizes ranging from 1.5–30 000 kW.
Piston compressors
Piston compressors are available as oil-injected and oil-free. They are used in general industrial applications as well as specialized applications.
Oil-free tooth and scroll compressors
Oil-free tooth and scroll compressors are used in industrial and medical applications with a demand for high-quality oil-free air. Some models are available as a WorkPlace AirSystem with integrated dryers as well as with energyefficient Variable Speed Drive (VSD).
Rotary screw compressors
Rotary screw compressors are available as oil-injected and oil-free. They are used in numerous industrial applications and can feature the WorkPlace AirSystem with integrated dryers, as well as the energy-efficient VSD technology and energy recovery kits.
Oil-free blowers
Oil-free blowers are available with different technologies: rotary lobe blowers, rotary screw blowers and centrifugal blowers. Blowers are used in process industry applications with a demand for a consistent flow of low-pressure air, for example wastewater treatment and conveying.
Oil-free centrifugal compressors
Oil-free centrifugal compressors are used in industrial applications that demand constant, large volumes of oil-free air. They are also called turbo compressors.
Gas and process compressors
Gas and process compressors are supplied primarily to the oil and gas, chemical/petrochemical process and power industries. The main product category is multi-stage centrifugal, or turbo, compressors which are complemented by turbo expanders.
Vacuum equipment
Vacuum pumps offer reliable and efficient vacuum solutions to industries such as printing, plastics, packaging, woodworking and bottling.
Air and gas treatment equipment
Dryers, coolers, gas purifiers and filters are supplied to produce the right quality of compressed air or gas. In addition, solutions for medical air, oxygen and nitrogen generation as well as systems for biogas upgrading are offered.
Portable oil-free screw compressors
Portable oil-free screw compressors are used to meet a temporary need for oil-free air, primarily in petrochemical and industrial applications. The equipment is rented out through the Specialty Rental division.
Industrial compressor for applications that demand high-quality oil-free air
Multiple brands are used to increase local presence and reach specific customer segments
Vacuum pump with rotary screw element for industrial vacuum
President Peter Wagner
The market
The global market for compressed air equipment, air and gas treatment equipment and related services is characterized by a diversified customer base. The customers demand solutions that are reliable, productive and efficient and suited to specific applications.
Compressors are used in a wide spectrum of applications in which compressed air is either used as a source of power, mainly in the manufacturing industry, or as an integrated part of the industrial processes. An important application is assembly operations, where compressed air is used to power assembly tools. In industrial processes, clean, dry and oil-free air is needed for applications where the compressed air comes into direct contact with the end product, such as in the food, pharmaceutical, electronics, and textile industries. Apart from the process and manufacturing industries, industrial compressors are used in applications as diversified as snow making, fish farming, on high-speed trains, and in hospitals.
Blowers are used in applications with a demand for a consistent flow of low-pressure air, for example wastewater treatment and conveying.
Vacuum is used in industrial applications where the pressure is required to be below atmospheric pressure.
Gas and process compressors and expanders are supplied to various process industries, such as air separation plants, power utilities, chemical and petrochemical plants, and liquefied natural gas applications.
Stationary industrial air compressors and associated airtreatment products, spare parts and services represent about 85% of sales. Large gas and process compressors represent approximately 10% and specialty rental, some 5% of sales.
Market trends
- Energy efficiency and energy recovery focus on the life-cycle cost of compressors and related equipment
- Increased environmental awareness energy savings and reduction of CO2 emissions
- Workplace compressors with low noise levels
- Quality Air air treatment equipment
- Outsourcing of maintenance and monitoring of compressed air installations
- Energy auditing of installations
- New applications for compressed air
- Specialty rental
Demand drivers
- Investments in machinery
- Industrial production
- Energy costs
Vision and strategy
The vision is to be First in Mind—First in Choice® as a supplier of compressed air solutions, by being interactive, committed and innovative, and offering customers the best value.
The strategy is to further develop Atlas Copco's leading position in the field of compressed air and gas, and grow the business in a way that is economically, environmentally and socially responsible. This should be done by capitalizing on the strong market presence worldwide, improving market penetration in mature and developing markets, and continuously developing improved products and solutions to satisfy demands from customers. The presence is enhanced by utilizing multiple brands. The strategy encompasses giving a continuous focus to the service business as well as developing businesses within focused areas such as air treatment equipment, low pressure compressors, vacuum equipment, and compressor solutions for trains, ships, and hospitals. The ambition is to continue to grow the service business, to further strengthen the position in the specialty rental business and to develop new businesses. The business area is actively looking at acquiring complementary businesses.
Strategic activities
- Increase market coverage and establish presence in new markets
- Invest in employees and competence development
- Extend the offering, development, and marketing of service
- Perform more service on a higher share of the installed base of machines
- Develop new sustainable products and solutions offering better value and improved energy efficiency to customers
- Extend the product offering, including new compressors and air and gas treatment equipment
- Increase operational efficiency
- Acquire complementary businesses
Market position
Compressor Technique has a leading market position globally in most of its operations.
Competition
Compressor Technique's principal competitors in the market for industrial compressors and air treatment equipment are Ingersoll-Rand, Kaeser, Hitachi, Gardner-Denver, Cameron, Sullair, and Parker Hannifin. There are also numerous regional and local competitors. In the market for gas and process compressors and expanders, the main competitors are Siemens and MAN Turbo.
Industrial Technique
The year in review
- ➔ Record order intake, 2% organic order growth
- ➔ Record revenues and record operating profit
- ➔ Prestigious awards won for innovations
Business development
The overall demand for industrial tools and assembly systems was healthy. For comparable units, orders received increased 2% with the best development in North America. The order intake was particularly strong in the first half of the year. In total, orders received increased 11% and reached a new record.
The demand for advanced industrial tools and assembly systems to the motor vehicle industry improved as manufacturers continued to equip new assembly lines and upgrade existing ones with new and more productive tools and systems. The order volumes increased in all major markets with strong development in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Eastern Europe, and in China. The adhesive equipment business, which was acquired in October 2011, performed well and contributed to the strong growth.
Order volumes for industrial power tools from the general manufacturing industries decreased somewhat. The sales to the electronics industry and to airplane manufacturers developed well, but most other customer segments in general manufacturing invested less than in the previous year. Geographically, the order volumes were lower in most major markets with the important European market having the weakest development.
Orders received were largely unchanged for the vehicle service business, providing large fleet operators and specialized repair shops with tools and other equipment. It increased in North America, while it decreased in Europe and in Asia.
The service business continued to develop well. Customers increasingly demand service and maintenance support and this was supported by the dedicated service division that was created at the end of 2011. Double-digit order growth was achieved in all major markets; Europe, the United States and China.
Market presence and organizational development
The business area increased its presence in targeted markets and customer segments by adding resources in marketing, product development and service. In North America as well as in Asia, the workforce grew by more than 10% during 2012.
Innovation
Several industrial tools and assembly systems were introduced, including the following examples:
- An advanced assembly tool with a new controller, offering features such as a very quick shut off, leaving very little reaction force for the operator. It also has a built in gyroscope, which ensures that the bolt is tightened in the correct angle.
- A screwdriver system for low torque tightening applications in the electronics industry. The system increases the productivity, end-product quality and offers cost savings by reducing reworking and scrapping rates to a minimum.
- An advanced assembly tool for high torque applications.
- An improved product for torque measurement and testing of assembly tools.
- Numerous pneumatic grinders, drills, percussive tools and impact wrenches.
Achievements
The prestigious RedDot Design Award was won by a range of tightening tools with controllers that provide error proofed tightening and low energy consumption. The tools are well-balanced, user-friendly and have a number of ergonomic features. The controllers offer an intuitive human machine interface and give the operator clear feedback on a screen.
Atlas Copco's two most prestigious awards were presented to two teams within the Industrial Technique business area. The Peter Wallenberg Sales and Marketing Award recognized a successful product launch towards the aerospace industry, while the John Munck Award rewarded the development of an innovative range of power tools.
Revenues, profits and returns
Revenues increased 22% to a record MSEK 9 566 (7 821), up 12% organically. Operating profit increased 22% to MSEK 2 155 (1 767), corresponding to a margin of 22.5% (22.6). The increased operating profit was primarily a result of higher volumes. Return on capital employed was 43% (55) and was affected by acquisitions made at the end of 2011.
Business Area President: Mats Rahmström
Demand for industrial tools and assembly systems was healthy, supported by investments made by the motor vehicle industry. The business area continued to invest in presence and product development and to further develop the service business.
Revenues
+22%
Operating profit
| Key figures, MSE K |
2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Orders received | 9 435 | 8 462 |
| Revenues | 9 566 | 7 821 |
| Operating profit | 2 155 | 1 767 |
| Operating margin, % | 22.5 | 22.6 |
| Return on capital employed, % | 43 | 55 |
| Investments | 170 | 155 |
| Average number of employees | 4 389 | 3 562 |
assembly technologY for improved fuel efficiency and lower emissions
Atlas Copco is contributing to this development by developing and offering tools that make it possible to assemble these lighter materials
Increased environmental awareness as well as legislation has been driving the demand for increased fuel efficiency in vehicles and airplanes. To facilitate this, manufacturers are increasingly using lighter materials, which require new assembly technologies.
Atlas Copco is contributing to this development by developing and offering tools that make it possible to assemble these lighter materials. For new airplanes that are built with light materials such as carbon fiber, titanium and aluminum, Atlas Copco offers advanced drills to drill close tolerance holes as well as advanced assembly tools for error-free tightening.
Battery tools save up to 80% on energy
A cordless tool allows the operators to work in more comfortable positions, reducing fatigue
An advanced industrial battery nutrunner was introduced in 2012. The nutrunner offers high joint quality, user-friendliness, operator mobility and low energy costs.
- ➔ The tool is programmable, allowing the operator to tighten to a specific torque. It instantly alerts the operator if a bolt is incorrectly tightened and errors can be corrected immediately, avoiding the expense of reworking. The tools use wireless communication for accurate monitoring setup.
- ➔ A cordless tool allows the operators to work in more comfortable positions, reducing fatigue. Also, it weighs less than cable-based models.
- ➔ The tools' energy consumption is up to 80% lower than a corresponding air tool.
Revenues and operating margin
Earnings and return
The operations
The Industrial Technique business area provides industrial power tools, assembly systems, quality assurance products, software and services through a global network. It innovates for sustainable productivity for customers in the automotive and aerospace industries, industrial manufacturing and maintenance, and in vehicle service. Principal product development and manufacturing units are located in Sweden, France, Japan and Germany.
The divisions
Service President Lars Eklöf
Systems President Tobias Hahn
and Assembly Systems President Henrik Elmin
Chicago Pneumatic Tools President Anders Lindqvist
Products and applications
The Industrial Technique business area offers the most extensive range of industrial power tools and assembly systems on the market.
Motor vehicle industry
The motor vehicle industry primarily demands advanced assembly tools and assembly systems and is offered a broad range of electric assembly tools, control systems and associated software packages for safety-critical tightening. Specialized application centers around the world configure suitable assembly systems. The systems make it possible to view, collect and record the assembly data. The motor vehicle industry, like any industrial manufacturing operation, also demands basic industrial power tools. With the increasing requirement of lower fuel consumption and the use of lighter materials, the motor vehicle industry is increasingly using adhesives and is offered dispensing equipment for adhesives and sealants.
General industrial manufacturing
The business area provides a complete range of products, services and production solutions for general industrial manufacturing. Products range from basic fastening tools, drills and abrasive tools to the most advanced assembly systems available. Adhesive and sealant equipment is also offered to general industrial manufacturing businesses. A large team of specialists is available to support customers in improving production efficiency.
Vehicle service
The business area offers powerful and reliable tools to meet the demands of the vehicle service professional. The offering includes impact wrenches, percussive tools, drills, sanders and grinders.
The market
The motor vehicle industry, including sub-suppliers, is a key customer segment representing approximately half of Industrial Technique's revenues, and the application served is primarily assembly operations. The motor vehicle industry has been at the forefront of demanding more accurate fastening tools that minimize errors in production and enable recording and traceability of operations. The business area has successfully developed advanced electric industrial tools and assembly systems that assist customers in achieving fastening according to their specifications and minimizing errors and interruptions in production. With the increasing requirement of lower fuel consumption and the use of lighter materials, the motor vehicle industry is increasingly using adhesives. The business area offers dispensing equipment for adhesives and sealants.
In general industry, industrial tools are used in a number of applications, such as assembly, drilling and material removal. Customers are found in assembly operations, e.g. electronics, aerospace and appliances, in general industrial manufacturing, shipyards, foundries and among machine tool builders. The equipment supplied includes assembly tools, drills, percussive tools, grinders, hoists and trolleys, and accessories. Air motors are also supplied separately for different applications in production facilities.
For vehicle service – car and truck service – and tire and body shops, the equipment supplied includes impact wrenches, percussive tools, drills, sanders, and grinders.
There is a growing demand for service, e.g. maintenance contracts and calibration services that improve customers' productivity.
Market trends
- More advanced tools and systems and increased importance of service, know-how and training, driven by higher requirements for quality and productivity
- More power tools with electric motors, partly replacing pneumatic tools
- Demand for lower fuel consumption drives demand for alternative assembly methods, e.g. adhesives
- Both general industrial and motor vehicle manufacturing are moving east
- Increasing customer focus on productivity, ergonomics and environment
Demand drivers
- Assembly line investments
- Replacement and service of tools and systems
- Changes in manufacturing methods, e.g. change from pneumatic to electric tools
- Industrial production
Vision and strategy
The vision is to be First in Mind—First in Choice® as a supplier of industrial power tools, assembly systems, quality assurance products, software, and services to customers in the motor vehicle industry, in targeted areas in the general manufacturing industry and in vehicle service.
The strategy is to continue to grow the business profitably by building on the technological leadership and continuously offering products and services that improve customers' productivity. Important activities are to extend the product offering, particularly with the motor vehicle industry and to provide additional services, know-how and training. The business area is also increasing its presence in general industrial manufacturing, vehicle service and geographically in targeted markets in Asia and Eastern Europe. The presence is enhanced by utilizing multiple brands. The business area is actively looking at acquiring complementary businesses. Growth should be achieved in a way that is economically, environmentally and socially responsible.
Strategic activities
- Increase market coverage and improve presence in targeted markets
- Develop the service business
- Develop new sustainable products and solutions, offering increased quality and productivity, improved ergonomics and reduced environmental impact
- Invest in employees and competence development
- Extend the product and service offering
- Acquire complementary businesses
Market position
Industrial Technique has a leading market position globally in most of its operations.
Competition
Industrial Technique's competitors in the industrial tools business include Apex Tool Group, Ingersoll-Rand, Stanley Black & Decker, Uryu, Bosch and several local and regional competitors. In the area of adhesive and sealant equipment, the primary competitors are Nordson and Graco.
Mining and Rock Excavation Technique
The year in review
- ➔ Record order intake; 4% organic order growth
- ➔ Record revenues and record operating profit
- ➔ Acquisition of new technology expands offer
Business development
The activity in the mining industry remained high and the demand for new equipment was at a good level, particularly in the beginning of the year. The order intake was significantly higher in the first half of the year compared to the second half, when the customers became more hesitant to take decisions to invest in capital equipment. Order volumes for equipment were lower compared to the previous year, primarily due to lower order intake for underground and exploration equipment, while some large orders for drill rigs for open-pit mining contributed postively. Geographically, the best development was seen in South America and Australia, where several large orders were won.
The demand for drilling equipment for civil engineering projects was weaker than in 2011 and the order volumes for both underground and surface drilling equipment decreased.
Demand for service and spare parts remained strong and the newly created service division continued to invest in the organization and took several initiatives to further develop the business. Orders received developed very favorably and grew with double digits in all regions. The sales of consumables also increased in all regions compared to the previous year, but in the latter part of the year, some customers were cautious in replenishing their inventories, which impacted the order intake negatively.
Total order intake increased 4% organically and reached a new record.
Market presence and organizational development
Atlas Copco opened customer centers in both Mozambique and Burkina Faso, to strengthen the presence in Africa.
Actions to further increase market presence continued and the number of employees in marketing, service and product development increased.
The demand for mining and rock excavation equipment weakened in the second half of the year, which led to actions to adapt the capacity to the weaker demand.
Innovation
Several new products and solutions were introduced, including the following examples:
- Four different versions of underground production drill rigs.
- A drill rig for tunneling applications, equipped with a more powerful rock drill and a new control system.
- A rotary drill rig for open pit mining. The rig has features for reduced fuel consumption, and the control system supports automatic drilling and remote tramming.
Acquisitions
The business area made four acquisitions in 2012:
- Perfora S.p.A., an Italian company that manufactures and sells drilling and cutting equipment for the dimension stone industry with annual revenues of MSEK 90 and 43 employees.
- The underground business of GIA Industri AB, a Sweden-based manufacturer of mine trucks, loaders and utility vehicles for mining and tunneling applications. The business has annual revenues of about MSEK 230 and 113 employees.
- Neumatica, Atlas Copco's distributor of large surface drilling equipment and related services in Colombia, with 15 employees.
- NewTech Drilling Products, a U.S.-based manufacturer of bits for mining and oil and gas drilling with annual revenues of MSEK 45 and 20 employees.
In December, Atlas Copco agreed to acquire MEYCO Equipment, a Swiss manufacturer of mobile equipment for applying sprayed concrete (shotcreting) in underground operations, with annual revenues of MSEK 175 and 40 employees. The acquisition is expected to be closed during the first quarter of 2013.
Revenues, profits and returns
Revenues increased to a record MSEK 34 054 (29 356), corresponding to 14% organic growth. Operating profit increased 16% to MSEK 8 315 (7 196), corresponding to a margin of 24.4% (24.5). The margin was supported by increased revenue volumes, but it was negatively affected by revenue mix and dilution from acquisitions. Return on capital employed was 59% (66).
Business Area President: Bob Fassl
The orders received were strong in the beginning of the year, but weakened in the second half as customers became more hesitant to invest. The business area expanded its market presence, continued to invest in service and in product development and made several acquisitions.
| +16% |
|---|
Revenues
+16%
Operating profit
| Key figures, MSE K |
2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Orders received | 33 482 | 31 751 |
| Revenues | 34 054 | 29 356 |
| Operating profit | 8 315 | 7 196 |
| Operating margin, % | 24.4 | 24.5 |
| Return on capital employed, % | 59 | 66 |
| Investments | 1 298 | 1 294 |
| Average number of employees | 12 766 | 10 724 |
Energy-efficient control system simulator training for
The surface drill rigs Smart ROC T35 and T40 are equipped with an innovative, highly energy-efficient control system with new electric, hydraulic and compressed air systems. The system is optimized to supply only the power needed to perform the work.
Engine and compressor speed are self-adjusting according to demand. Three variable hydraulic pumps help lower engine speed during none-drilling time and tramming and the idling speed of the engine is reduced.
These features lead to up to 45% lower fuel consumption. In a typical application this could be 20 000 liters in a year, which amounts to an annual reduction of more than 50 tonnes CO2 emissions.
The reduced engine load also extends the lifetime of the engine. The new hydraulic system features 50% less hoses and a hydraulic oil tank that is less than half the size of its predecessors.
improved productivity
number of training products to its customers
The demand for training is continuously increasing. It takes time for employees to become fully productive and with good training this time can be shortened. In addition, with good training the productivity of the employees is also improving. Atlas Copco is offering a number of training products to its customers.
Drilling operators, for example, are offered training programs that include simulator training. Experience indicates that the time it takes to become productive can be cut in half. Also, there is no need to utilize
existing machines for training. Instead, they can be used for production.
Simulator training contributes to increased customer productivity
Revenues and operating margin
Earnings and return
The operations
The Mining and Rock Excavation Technique business area provides equipment for drilling and rock excavation, and a complete range of related consumables and service through a global network. The business area innovates for sustainable productivity in surface and underground mining, infrastructure, civil works, well drilling and geotechnical applications. Principal product development and manufacturing units are located in Sweden, the United States, Canada, China and India.
The divisions
Mining and Rock Excavation Service President Andreas Malmberg
Rock Drilling Tools President Johan Halling
Rock Excavation President David Shellhammer
Geotechnical Drilling and Exploration President Victor Tapia
Surface Drilling President Markku Teräsvasara
Rocktec President Scott Barker
Drilling Solutions President Peter Salditt
Products and applications
The Mining and Rock Excavation Technique business area offers an extensive range of productivity enchancing equipment for rock excavation and civil engineering applications.
Underground rock drilling equipment
Underground drill rigs are used to drill blast holes in hard rock to excavate ore in mines or to excavate rock for road, railway or hydropower tunnels, or underground storage facilities. Holes are also drilled for rock reinforcement with rock bolts. The business area offers drill rigs with hydraulic and pneumatic rock drills, as well as handheld rock drills. Raise boring machines are used to drill large diameter holes, 0.6–6.0 meters, which can be used for ventilation, ore and personnel transportation.
Underground loading and haulage equipment
Underground vehicles are used mainly in mining applications, to load and transport ore and/or waste rock.
Underground utility vehicles
Utility vehicles are used for scaling, bolting, charging and lifting.
Surface drilling equipment
Surface drill rigs are primarily used for blast hole drilling in open pit mining, quarries, and civil engineering projects, but also to drill for water, shallow oil and gas. The business area offers drill rigs with hydraulic and pneumatic rock drills as well as rotary drill rigs.
Rock drilling tools
Rock drilling tools include drill bits and drill rods for blast hole drilling in both underground and surface drilling applications, as well as consumables for raise boring and rotary drilling.
Exploration drilling and ground engineering equipment
The business area supplies a wide range of equipment for underground and surface exploration applications. An extensive range of equipment for ground engineering, including systems for overburden drilling, is also offered. Applications include anchoring, geotechnical surveying, ground reinforcement and water well drilling.
Mobile crushers and screeners
Mobile crushers and screeners are used mainly to produce aggregate in quarries and to recycle construction waste.
Rotary blast hole rig for open-pit mining
Underground loader
The market
The total market for equipment for mining and civil engineering applications is very large with numerous companies supplying products to different applications. The Mining and Rock Excavation Technique business area, however, offers products and services only for selected applications.
Customers from the mining industry represent more than two thirds of business area revenues. The applications include production and development work for both underground and open pit mines as well as mineral exploration. The customers demand rock drilling equipment, rock drilling tools, loading and haulage equipment, and exploration drilling equipment.
Contractors involved in civil engineering and infrastructure construction represent nearly one third of revenues. The applications include blasthole drilling for tunneling, e.g. for road, railway and dam construction, aggregate production and drilling for water and energy as well as for ground engineering. The customers demand rock drilling equipment, rock drilling tools and ground engineering equipment.
The equipment is primarily sold directly to the end user and the business area has a large organization offering service and spare parts. Mining companies and contractors demand service, spare parts and consumables, often in the form of contracts where availability and productivity are key criteria.
Market trends
- More productive and safe equipment, including solutions for autonomous operations
- More intelligent products and remote control
- Increased focus on environment and safety
- Customer and supplier consolidation
- Performance contracts for service and consumables
Demand drivers
Mining
- Machine investments
- Ore production
Civil engineering
- Infrastructure and public investments
- Non-building construction activity
Vision and strategy
The vision is to be First in Mind—First in Choice® as a supplier of equipment and services for rock excavation for mining and civil engineering applications.
The strategy is to grow by maintaining and reinforcing Atlas Copco's leading market position as a global supplier for rock excavation equipment and services; by developing its positions in drilling and loading equipment, exploration drilling, and related businesses; and by increasing revenues by offering more services to customers. Growth should be achieved in a way that is economically, environmentally and socially responsible.
Strategic activities
- Invest in employees and competence development
- Invest in the service business
- Invest in design, development and production capacity in growth markets such as China and India to meet local demand
- Develop sustainable products and services in line with customer demand for increased productivity, safety and energy efficiency
- Extend the product offering, including options such as computerized control systems, and systems for automation and remote operations
- Acquire complementary businesses
- Increase operational efficiency
Market position
Mining and Rock Excavation Technique has a leading market position globally in most of its operations.
Competition
Mining and Rock Excavation Technique's principal competitor in most product areas is Sandvik. Other competitors include Furukawa in the market for underground and surface drilling equipment; Boart Longyear for underground drilling equipment for mining, exploration drilling equipment and rock drilling tools; Joy Global for open-pit mining equipment and Caterpillar for underground and open-pit mining equipment. In addition, there are several competitors operating locally, regionally and in certain niche areas.
Construction Technique
The year in review
- ➔ 1% organic order growth
- ➔ New dedicated sales and service organizations established in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Mexico, South Africa, West and Central Africa and Central Europe
- ➔ Investments in product development
Business development
The demand for construction equipment was mixed following the weak ending of 2011 and total orders received increased 2%, corresponding to 1% organic growth. The demand in North America and Africa/Middle East developed very well and strong growth in orders received was noted. In North America, investments from rental companies contributed strongly to the growth. This positive development was however largely offset by the decreased order intake in Europe and in Asia, including a negative development in the important Chinese market.
Orders received for portable compressors, generators, pumps and lighting towers increased somewhat with the best development in North America and in Africa/Middle East. Orders for road construction equipment and for construction tools, such as breakers, decreased. The decrease was primarily attributable to a lower order intake in Asia, but it was also lower in Europe and South America. It was only partly offset by an increase in orders received in North America.
The service business for the business area continued to grow, but it was impacted by the overall demand development. This resulted in strong growth in North America, while volumes were somewhat lower in Europe and Asia.
Market presence and organizational development
The business area increased its presence in targeted markets by establishing dedicated Construction Technique sales and service organizations in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Mexico, South Africa, West and Central Africa and Central Europe, and by adding employees in sales and marketing. In West Africa, a new customer center was established in Senegal. The number of employees increased in North America, Asia, and in Africa/Middle East.
The investments in product development remained high and the number of employees in research and development increased by more than 10%.
Several initiatives were taken to reorganize the production to create more competitive production units with stronger future growth potential. The production unit for road construction equipment in Karlskrona, Sweden, for example, plans to invest MSEK 30, but also to reduce the workforce. Final notice was given to 78 blue collar employees at the end of September.
Innovation
Several new products and solutions were introduced, including the following examples:
- Several large portable compressors with fuel-saving systems.
- A number of rig-mounted attachments, e.g. bucket crushers, for efficient and economic recycling of all types of waste materials.
- A range of mid-size soil rollers and a number of other machines with tier-4 engines that reduce emissions.
- Solar powered light towers.
- Hydraulic breakers that have essential features, such as high performance and low weight, and meet the demands of more customer segments. The breakers are an alternative to premium breakers.
- Several portable compressors and generators, hydraulic and pneumatic construction tools and light compaction equipment.
- Kits for enhanced maintenance and overhaul of construction equipment.
Revenues, profits and returns
Revenues were MSEK 12 888 (12 918). Operating profit decreased to MSEK 1 326 (1 460), corresponding to a margin of 10.3% (11.3). The operating profit includes restructuring costs of MSEK 65 (105). The adjusted operating margin was 10.8% (12.1) and was negatively affected by lower volumes and investments in new customer centers. Return on capital employed was 10% (12).
Operating profit
Business Area President: Nico Delvaux
The demand for construction equipment was mixed during 2012. The business area continued to invest in market presence and product development and took several initiatives to improve the structure and the cost of the operations.
| ±0% | –9% | |
|---|---|---|
| Key figures, MSE K |
2012 | 2011 |
| Orders received | 13 001 | 12 786 |
| Revenues | 12 888 | 12 918 |
| Operating profit | 1 326 | 1 460 |
| Operating margin, % | 10.3 | 11.3 |
| Return on capital employed, % | 10 | 12 |
| Investments | 286 | 150 |
Revenues
Average number of employees 5 101 5 339
innovative features save fuel Tools for efficient and
Atlas Copco's high-pressure portable compressors suitable for drilling applications have a number of features that increase performance and reduce fuel consumption.
One feature is an electronic control module that regulates engine speed and air intake in order to optimize the fuel consumption for each working condition. This feature can reduce fuel consumption by an average 10%.
Another feature is a system that enables variable regulation of the compressed air. This system allows that the pressure and the flow output is selected according to the application. This feature enables an additional 3% fuel savings.
economic recycling
The EU directive on waste management demands a recycling quota of 70% for construction and demolition waste by year 2020
The requirements on demolition work have grown significantly in the past few years. The EU directive on waste management demands a recycling quota of 70% for construction and demolition waste by year 2020.
Atlas Copco has an extensive range of rig-mounted and handheld demolition equipment that covers virtually the full spectrum of modern demolition applications.
An example is the range of rigmounted bucket crushers launched in 2012. Using these crushers, asphalt, stone and concrete debris can be crushed and directly re-used on site.
High pressure compressor for drilling applications
Revenues and operating margin
Earnings and return
The operations
The Construction Technique business area provides construction and demolition tools, portable compressors, pumps and generators, lighting towers, and compaction and paving equipment. The business area offers service through a global network. Construction Technique innovates for sustainable productivity in infrastructure, civil works and road construction projects. Principal product development and manufacturing units are located in Belgium, Germany, Sweden, China and Brazil.
The divisions
Technique Service President Adrian Ridge
Norbert Paprocki
Equipment President Peter Lauwers
Construction Tools President Henk Brouwer
Products and applications
The Construction Technique business area offers a range of products for selected applications in civil engineering, demolition and road building.
Portable compressors
Portable compressors are primarily used in construction applications where the compressed air is used as a power source for equipment, such as pneumatic breakers and rock drills.
Boosters
When extra high pressure is needed, boosters are used to boost the air fed by portable compressors. This high-pressure air is mainly used in the drilling industry and in oil and gas applications.
Generators
Portable generators fulfill a temporary need for electricity, primarily in construction applications. Other common generator applications are power supply for events, emergency power and power in remote locations.
Lighting towers
Light for safe operations 24/7.
Pumps
Submersible pumps, primarily for water.
Compaction and paving equipment
The business area offers a range of compaction and paving equipment to the road construction market. Rollers are used to compact all types of soil or newly laid asphalt. Planers are used for removing asphalt and pavers for laying out new asphalt. The product range also includes smaller handheld compaction and concrete equipment.
Construction and demolition tools
Hydraulic, pneumatic and gasoline-powered breakers, cutters and drills are offered to construction, demolition and mining businesses.
The market
The total market for construction equipment is very large. It has a large number of market participants offering a wide range of products for different applications. The Construction Technique business area, however, offers products and services only for selected applications.
The key customer segment is construction, accounting directly for approximately two thirds of revenues. General and civil engineering contractors, often involved in infrastructure projects like road building, other non-building activity and/or demolition work, demand compaction and paving equipment and light construction tools, such as breakers and cutters. Dieseldriven portable compressors and generators are reliable power sources for machines and tools in the construction sector as well as for mining and numerous industrial applications.
Contractors as well as rental companies are important customers for service, including spare parts, maintenance contracts, and repairs.
Market trends
- More productive equipment
- More intelligent products
- Increased focus on environment and safety
- Customer and supplier consolidation
- Increased demands for service support/contracts
Demand drivers
- Infrastructure and public investments
- Road building and other non-building construction activities
- Demolition and recycling
- Flexible/portable equipment
Vision and strategy
The vision is to be First in Mind—First in Choice® as a supplier of equipment and services for portable energy, road development, and demolition applications to the construction industries.
The strategy is to grow by developing Atlas Copco's market position and presence as a global supplier within the selected niches for the construction industries, in construction and demolition tools, portable compressors, pumps and generators, lighting towers, and compaction and paving equipment. The presence is enhanced by utilizing multiple brands. The strategy also includes development of the service business; increasing revenues by offering more customers more services. Growth should be achieved in a way that is economically, environmentally and socially responsible.
Strategic activities
- Increase operational efficiency
- Increase market coverage and presence
- Capture sales and service synergies between the construction businesses
- Develop new sustainable products and solutions offering enhanced productivity, safety and reduced environmental impact
- Invest in design, development and production capacity in growth markets such as China and India to meet local demand
- Develop more competitive offerings with different value propositions
- Develop the global service concept/competence, extend the service offering and perform more service on a higher share of the installed base of machines
- Invest in employees and competence development
- Acquire complementary businesses
Market position
The Construction Technique business area has leading or strong market positions globally in most of its operations.
Competition
Construction Technique's principal competitors in the market for portable compressors are Doosan Infracore, Kaeser and Sullair. Volvo, Caterpillar and Wirtgen are the principal competitors for road construction equipment and Sandvik, Furukawa and Wacker Neuson for construction tools. In addition, there is a large number of competitors operating locally, regionally and in certain niche areas. Sany and XCMG are examples of Chinese competitors in the area of road construction equipment.
risks, risk management and opportunities
| Risk | Context | Mitigating factors | Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market risks |
A widespread financial crisis and economic downturn would not only affect the Group negatively but it could also have an impact on the customers' ability to finance their investments. Changes in customers' pro duction levels also have an effect on the Group's sales of spare parts, service and consumables. In developing markets, new smaller competitors continuously appear which may affect Atlas Copco negatively, mainly through competitive pricing. |
P Well diversified sales to customers in multiple countries and industries. Sales of spare parts and service are relatively stable in comparison to equipment sales. P Monthly follow up of market and sales development enables quick actions. P Flexible manufacturing setup makes it possible to quickly adapt to changes in equipment demand. P Leading position in most market segments, with relatively few competitors of a compara ble size, provide economies of scale. |
➔ A significant competitive advantage as a result of a strong global presence, including growth markets. ➔ Opportunities to positively impact both the society and environment, through the Group's high quality sustainable products and high ethical standards. ➔ Create a better society and business environ ment which positively impacts Group revenu es in the future. ➔To continue to develop close, long-term and strategic relationships with customers and suppliers. |
| Product development risks |
One of the challenges for Atlas Copco's long-term growth and profitability will be to continuously develop innovative, sustainable products that consume less resources (such as energy, water, steel, and human effort) over the entire life cycle. Atlas Copco's product offering is also affected by national and regional legislation, on issues such as emissions, noise, vibrations, and recycling. However, there may be increased risk of competition in emerging markets where low-cost products are not affected by such rules. The risk is deemed minor that a major techno logical advancement by a competitor could undermine the Group's position in any significant way. |
P Continuous investments in research and development to develop products in line with customer demand and expectations, even during economic downturns. P Designing products with a life cycle perspecti ve and measurable efficiency targets for the main product categories for each Division. P Designing products with reduced emissions, vibrations or noise and increased recycling potential to meet legislative requirements. |
➔ Substantial opportunities to strengthen the competitive edge by innovating high quality, sustainable products and creating an integrated value proposition for customers. |
| Production risks |
Core component manufacturing is concen trated in a few locations and if there are in terruptions or lack of capacity in these loca tions, this may have an effect on deliveries or on the quality of products. Production facilities could also have a risk of damaging the environment through operations, e.g. through hazardous waste and emissions. Atlas Copco is directly and indirectly exposed to raw material prices. |
P Manufacturing units continuously monitor the production process, test the safety and quality of the products, make risk assessments, and train employees. P Manufacturing units invest in modern equip ment that can perform multiple operations. P Production units are subject to continuous risk management surveys to safeguard that they comply with the Atlas Copco loss prevention standard. P Goal to certify all manufacturing units in accordance with the ISO 14001 standard. |
➔ Continued opportunities to extensively pro mote operational excellence to streamline production, minimize inefficiencies and main tain a high flexibility in the production process. ➔ Cost increases for raw materials and components often coincide with strong end customer demand and can partly be compen sated by increased sales to mining customers and by increased market prices. |
| Supply chain risks |
Atlas Copco and its business partners such as suppliers, sub-contractors and joint ven ture partners, must share the same high standards for the environment, labor and human rights otherwise there is a risk of compromising the Group's reputation and brand. The availability of many components is dependent on suppliers and if they have interruptions or lack capacity, this may have an undesirable effect on deliveries. The use of many suppliers gives rise to the risk that products contain components which are not sustainably produced, e.g. that electronic components contain conflict minerals (whose trade or taxation fund armed groups in conflict areas such as the Democratic Republic of Congo). |
P Select and evaluate business partners on the basis of objective factors including quality, delivery, price, and reliability, as well as commitment to environmental and social performance. P Globally implemented internal training on supplier evaluations. P Atlas Copco has begun the process to investi gate and eradicate the presence of conflict minerals in its value chain. P Atlas Copco has established a global network of sub-suppliers, to prevent supplier dependency. P Business partners are requested to sign a compliance letter to the Business Code of Practice. P E-learning for business partners launched in order to raise awareness of Atlas Copco's Business Code of Practice. |
➔ Further increase Atlas Copco's business agility and reduce costs by improving supplier inventory management in response to changes in demand. ➔ Continue to be a preferred business partner and promote efficiency, sustainability and safety. Good supplier relations help to impro ve Atlas Copco's competitive position. ➔ Opportunity to strengthen customer relations hips by being ready to support customers who are impacted by the Dodd-Frank legislation on conflict minerals. ➔ Promote human rights and work towards improving labor conditions, reducing corrup tion and conflicts. |
| Distribution risks |
Atlas Copco primarily distributes products and services directly to the end customer. If the distribution is not efficient, it may impact customer satisfaction, sales and profits. Some sales are made indirect through distributors and rental companies and their performance can have a negative effect on Atlas Copco's sales. The distribution of Atlas Copco's products can result in increased CO2 emissions from transport. |
P Physical distribution of products is concentra ted to a number of distribution centers and the delivery efficiency of these is continuously monitored. P Significant resources are allocated to training and development of the service organization. P As indirect sales are local/regional, the negati ve impact of poor performance is limited. P Increased focus on smarter and more effective transports, including optimizing the vehicle loading to reduce the weight of the shipment and the space used and sending larger or com bined deliveries to reduce the total emissions per transport. |
➔ Continue to strengthen its relationship with customers through timely deliveries of products and services. ➔ Transport efficiencies can save the customer time and cost while reducing the environ mental impact of their own operations. ➔ Atlas Copco can reduce its own fuel costs and resource requirements which improves business agility for the Group. |
| Risk | Context | Mitigating factors | Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risks with acquisitions and divestments |
The integration of acquired businesses is a difficult process and it is not certain that it will be successful or smooth every time. Therefore, costs related to acquisitions can be higher and/or synergies can take longer to materialize than anticipated. Annual impairment tests are made on acquired goodwill. If goodwill is not dee med justified in such impairment tests it can result in a write-down, which would affect the Atlas Copco Group's result. Acquisitions and divestments can impact local communities, e.g. employees, their families and/or the environment, directly or indirectly. |
P The Group has established an Acquisitions Process Council which provides training and supports all business units prior to, during and post an acquisition. P Atlas Copco guidelines and policies are applied to assess and manage the environmental and social impact of operations in the affected communities after an acquisition is complete. P Human rights and environmental considera tions are integrated when acquisitions and divestments are made. |
➔ Identifying the obstacles to integration can allow Atlas Copco to improve the process through methods such as job rotation, training or team building exercises. This would not only result in a smoother integration process but also lower operational costs by decreasing downtime and allowing newly acquired compa nies to become productive and efficient more rapidly. |
| Financial risks | Changes in exchange rates can adversely affect Group earnings when revenues from sales and costs for production and sourcing are denominated in different currencies (transaction risks). An adverse effect on Group earnings can also occur when earn ings of foreign subsidiaries are translated into SEK and on the value of the Group equity when the net assets of foreign sub sidiaries are translated into SEK (translation risks). Atlas Copco's net interest cost is affected by changes in market interest rates. Atlas Copco is exposed to the risk of non payment by any of its extensive number of end customers to whom sales are made on credit. |
P A Financial Risk Management Committee meets regularly to take decisions about how to manage financial risks. P The Group's operations continuously monitor and adjust sales prices and costs to limit the transaction risk. These measures can be complemented with hedging. P Translation risks are partially hedged by borrowings in foreign currency and financial derivatives. P Stringent credit policies are applied and no major concentration of credit risk exists in Atlas Copco. The provision for bad debt is based upon known cases and historical loss levels and is deemed sufficient. In the case of Atlas Copco Customer Finance, an in-house finan cing operations, risks are mitigated by retain ing security in the equipment until full payment is received, by purchasing credit risk insurance and/or by transferring the risk to a third party. |
➔ Working proactively with financial risks impro ves the profit margin and also creates possibili ties for more stable cash flow. Overall, financial risk mitigation has the ability to improve busi ness resilience for Atlas Copco. ➔ Atlas Copco Customer Finance can improve customer relations and attract more customers. |
| Risks to reputation |
The Group's reputation is a valuable asset which can be affected in part through the operation or actions of the Group and in part through the actions of external stakeholders. Products must deliver the brand promise and be of high quality, safe and have a low negative impact on the environment when used by the customer. There is potential for reputational risk from non-compliance to product labeling standards or if there are cases of false advertising. Unsatisfied employees may also potentially detract the Atlas Copco brand if they are not offered a good, safe and diverse working environment. |
P All Atlas Copco products are tested and also quality assured. P The Group strictly monitors its product labeling and offers communications training. P The Group actively engages in stakeholder dialogue to address concerns and receive insight into opportunities for improvement. P The training in the Business Code of Practice. P Clear well-known brand promise. P A comprehensive employee survey is carried out every two years and followed up actively. |
➔ Brand positioning. ➔ Stakeholder engagement cannot only mitigate reputational risks in certain cases but it also presents opportunities to increase the aware ness and credibility of Atlas Copco's brand through improvements and innovations. ➔ Delivering tested and quality assured products improve customer satisfaction and promote repeat business. ➔ Attract, develop and keep people that adhere to the Business Code of Practice. |
| Reporting risks |
The risk related to the communication of financial information to the capital market is that the reports do not give a fair view of the Group's true financial position and results of operations. Estimations often form a large portion of the sustainability data which is reported, and thus by its nature the numbers presen ted may not be precise representations of the Group's impact. |
P Atlas Copco subsidiaries report their financial statements regularly in accordance with Inter national Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The Group's consolidated financial statements, based on those reports, are prepared in accor dance with IFRS and applicable parts of the Annual Accounts Act as stated in RFR 1 "Supplementary Rules for Groups". P In order to minimize this risk, the Group has several procedures in place to ensure compli ance with Group instructions, standards, laws and regulations. P Atlas Copco reports sustainability information according to the GRI 3.0 principles. In order to minimize this risk, Atlas Copco works with training to improve reporting practices. |
➔ Integrated reporting identifies and encourages opportunities for business synergies. ➔ Addressing reporting risks increases transpa rency and improves the potential to represent the business fairly and accurately. ➔ Improved reporting also directly results in improved risk management, especially when the data has been integrated to highlight interdependencies. |
Continued: risks, risk management and opportunities
| Risk | Context | Mitigating factors | Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risks of corruption and fraud |
It is clear that corruption and bribery exist in markets where Atlas Copco conducts business. In Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index for 2012, 70% of the 176 countries included scored below 50 on a scale from 0 (perceived to be high ly corrupt) to 100 (perceived to have very low corruption). Atlas Copco does not tolerate bribes and corruption, including facilitation payments, which is clearly stated in the Business Code of Practice. The company works actively to prevent, detect and respond to potential corruption cases. |
P Zero tolerance policy on bribery and corruption, including facilitation payments. P Internal control routines in place aimed at pre venting and detecting deviations. The Internal Audit & Assurance function is established to ensure compliance with the Group's corporate governance, internal control and risk manage ment policies. P Control Self Assessment tool to analyze inter nal control processes and reduce the risk of corruption. P Training in the Business Code of Practice and in fraud awareness as well as workshops held to cover business integrity and ethical dilem mas. Transparency International's Corruption Perception Indices are used in trainings. P The Group has established interactive online training modules based on the tools provided by the UN Global Compact. P The Group hotline is established globally to report violations confidentially and with no penalties for reporting. P The Group supports fair competition and for bids discussions or agreements with competi tors concerning pricing or market sharing. |
➔ By fighting against corruption and fraud, Atlas Copco has the opportunity to work with its industry peers to reshape international market practices. Refusing to pay bribes may cause temporary delays and setbacks; however it reduces costs in both the long and short run, builds opportunities to improve operational efficiencies and creates more stability in the society and markets that Atlas Copco operates in. ➔ Working against corruption and fraud impro ves Atlas Copco's credibility and transparency and creates even more avenues to improve stakeholder relations. |
| Legal risks | Atlas Copco's business operations are affected by numerous commercial and financial agreements with customers, suppliers, and other counterparties, and by licenses, patents and other intangible property rights. This is normal for a busi ness like Atlas Copco's and the Group is not dependent upon any single agreement or intangible property right. Considering the size of the business operations of the Group, the actual level of the overall legal risk exposure remains low. |
P In-house lawyers present on five continents. P An in-depth yearly review of all companies within the Group is performed in addition to a continuous follow-up of the legal risk exposure. The result is compiled, analyzed, and reported to the Board. |
➔ Complying with legal norms and laws minimizes costs and increases opportunities to strengthen Atlas Copco's reputation. It also creates the chance to develop reliable partnerships and improve business stability. |
| Insurable risks | Atlas Copco has a customized insurance program in place to protect all insurable assets and interests of the Group. Each company within the Group is responsible for managing and reporting its insurance related matters in accordance with guide lines of the Group's insurance program. The scope of insurable risks covered by the insurance program includes properties, various types of liabilities, goods in transit and financial lines. The physical damage to the Group's facilities could have severe financial consequences. |
PThe Atlas Copco Group Insurance Program is provided by the Group in-house insurance companies Industria Insurance Company Ltd. and Atlas Copco Reinsurance S.A., which retain part of the risk exposure. P Reinsurance capacity is also purchased from leading reinsurers in cooperation with international insurance brokers. P Claims management services are purchased on a global basis from leading providers and a network of local fronting insurers are issuing insurance policies on a local basis to ensure legal compliance in all countries. P In connection with the insurance program, loss prevention standards have been devel oped through a large number of risk manage ment surveys. The various findings of the activities are summarized in a grading sched ule, which gives the management control over and an overview of the risk exposure through out the Group. |
➔ Working with insurable risks minimizes costs. ➔ By way of control and conformity in terms of level of risk management, the probability of events that can cause material damage and severely impact the business operation of the Atlas Copco Group is reduced and business can proceed without disruption. ➔ The use of insurance companies owned by Atlas Copco enables a strict control over all insurable interests and liabilities. It also enables a close follow up of each individual insurance claim impacting the Group, which can help to eliminate or reduce future claims. |
| Risk | Context | Mitigating factors | Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and health risks |
Issues with wellness and sick leave can impact the productivity and efficiency of the operations. Accidents or incidents at the workplace due to lack of proper safety measures or protective equipment can negatively affect productivity and the Atlas Copco employer brand. Atlas Copco recognizes the risk that seri ous diseases and pandemics can interrupt business operations and harm employees. |
P The Group regularly assesses and manages safety and health risks in operations. P The Group will implement OHSAS 18001 in all major units. P Workplace wellness programs to reduce the impact of pandemic HIV/AIDS are in place in southern Africa, where employees receive testing, awareness training, and consultation and treatment if necessary. P Atlas Copco's business partners are trained in the Group's policies including the company's approach to health and safety. |
➔ Improved safety and health in operations increases both employee productivity and morale. ➔ The Atlas Copco brand can continue to be strengthened through safe products, and it is an opportunity for the Group to continue to innovate in order to be seen as industry leaders. ➔ Atlas Copco can also improve working conditions for customers and suppliers, which can create long lasting relationships and repeat orders. |
| Environmental risks (external) |
The primary drivers for external environ mental risk are from physical changes in climate and natural resources, changes in regulations, taxes and resource prices. In general, Atlas Copco's exposure to this type of risk is perceived as low. From an operational perspective, increased fuel/energy taxes represent a risk for Atlas Copco as it can increase Atlas Copco's operational costs. Regulations and requirements related to carbon dioxide emissions from products and industrial processes are gradually increasing. At present none of the Group's operations are subject to any emission allowance trading schemes or similar systems. Changes in mean precipitation can affect all of Atlas Copco's operations but especially those operations situated in countries already affected by increased/decreased mean precipitation. Heavy rains or harsh winters can also negatively affect opera tions either directly or by disrupting the supply chain. |
P Atlas Copco consistently develops products with improved energy efficiency and reduced emissions. P In its own operations, Atlas Copco has several goals that address resource and energy usage in order to minimize the costs and negative impact on the environment. P All cooling agents used in Atlas Copco pro ducts have a zero ozone-depleting impact during the product's lifecycle, and the aim is to continue to introduce cooling agents with lower Global Warming Potential (GWP). P Atlas Copco's insurance company assesses the exposure to property risks as a result of extreme weather conditions and the danger of natural disasters. Preventive measures are taken to reduce the risk levels wherever necessary. |
➔ Working proactively with environmental risks can provide significant opportunities to drive innovation at Atlas Copco. ➔ Given that many customers are operating in areas of extreme water stress or scarcity, water efficient or water recycling products can have a strong customer appeal. Thus, this presents a strong business opportunity to extend Atlas Copco's innovations to the focused area of water consumption. ➔ Climate change impacts and predictions can induce changes in consumer's habits and behavior. As a result of climate events Atlas Copco's customers can become more risk averse and demand sustainable products from the Group. |
| Human rights risks |
Atlas Copco operates in countries where the risk according to Amnesty International is high of human rights abuse, including child labor, forced or compulsory labor. From time to time, Atlas Copco encounters customers, for instance in the mining industry, who are exposed to problems concerning environmental and human rights issues. Risks to the Group's reputation may also arise from the relationship with suppliers not complying with internationally accepted ethical, social, and environmental standards. |
P Guidance and regular interaction to identify risks with well-established NGOs such as Amnesty International. P A thorough risk mapping carried out with support from Amnesty International and Transparency International. P Gap analysis of all policies and procedures to match the standards set forth in the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human rights, which Atlas Copco has committed to since 2011. P Due diligence process and the integration of internal checks and controls for human rights violations in all business processes. P Integration of children's rights principles with support from UNICEF. P Specific human rights training is being developed to increase employee awareness. P Managers are repeatedly educated about Atlas Copco's Business Code of Practice. P The Group has developed a customer sustaina bility assessment tool to be used internally for evaluation of reputation and sustainability risks. P Supplier evaluations are regularly conducted in accordance with a checklist based on the UN Global Compact. |
➔ Following the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights to "do no harm" significantly reduces risks and costs; however a business' ability to "do good" according to these guidelines also creates significant business opportunities while creating a posi tive societal impact. For example: continuing to develop a diverse workforce can significant ly increase Atlas Copco's competitive edge and it can also increase the Group's knowl edge and capacity to tailor products to the customer's needs and preferences. ➔ Working with human rights positively impacts both employer and investor relations. ➔ Furthermore, strong business ethics promote internal stability while also creating a more stable market place by addressing social concerns, which creates long term business opportunities. |
Innovative, sustainable products and services
Atlas Copco develops innovative and sustainable products and services with the objective to increase customers' productivity, safety and energy efficiency. The aim of research and development activities is to support the Group's vision to become and remain First in Mind—First in Choice® for its customers.
The driving forces for new product developments are both internal and external.
Examples of external drivers:
Customers' demands and requests Laws and regulations User trends Design trends Competition Increased safety Improved ergonomics Environmental impact
Examples of internal drivers:
New technologies New applications Reduced lead time Increased quality Increased productivity Standardization and modularization Increased safety Improved ergonomics Environmental impact
With world-class customers in every corner of the world Atlas Copco's biggest challenge is to continue to meet their need of sustainable products to increase their productivity. A successful approach of maintaining a leading market position has been to cooperate with customers around the world and to work closely with universities. Further, development is also carried out in cooperation with suppliers or by leveraging their capabilities. At the same time as this approach safeguards customers' productivity and satisfaction, it contributes to Atlas Copco's own sustainability goals to reduce its environmental impact, a win-win situation. By providing high-quality products and services Atlas Copco continuously adds value to its customers.
Product development
The wide span of technologies used by Atlas Copco – from advanced computer control systems, hydraulics and pneumatics to specialized technologies such as air compression or rock drilling – creates an exciting environment for the Group's development engineers in many countries.
Productivity, reliability, safety, and energy efficiency are examples of key criteria in the projects. For example, in a project where energy efficiency is considered a key criterion the project will not be approved if the goal for energy efficiency is not met.
Compressed air is a crucial component in all manufacturing industries. Up to 10% of the total energy consumption in manufacturing worldwide comes from compressed air systems. Atlas Copco is strongly committed to continuously improving energy efficiency for its customers. A good example is the advanced Variable Speed Drive technology, which has achieved average customer savings of 25%. All oil-free compressors are certified to deliver air with no trace of oil.
More energy-efficient tools reduce both energy costs and CO2 emissions. Electric tools with a modular design are flexible, lighter and easier to disassemble. They vibrate less and make less noise than pneumatic tools. The optimized tool design improves ergonomics, increases efficiency, consumes less energy and reduces waste.
Mining and rock excavation equipment is developed to reduce the environmental impact and the customer's total cost of ownership by enhancing performance and reducing costs. Product development also always takes into account safe operation of the machines.
New construction equipment and services aim to reduce environmental impact by increasing energy efficiency, enhancing performance and reducing costs, such as those for fuel, labor and parts.
The number of product development projects in the Atlas Copco Group increased in 2012, including more projects where the focus is to develop differentiated products in the emerging markets.
The number of people employed in research and development increased by 18% to 2 483. Most of the employees are based in Europe, but the rate of increase in Asia was very high.
The amount invested in product development, including capitalized expenditures, increased 24% to MSEK 2 231 (1 802) corresponding to 2.5% (2.2) of revenues and 3.1% (2.8) of operating expenses.
Research and development expenditures
Product lifecycle
Relevant aspects of ergonomics, safety and health are assessed both in the product development process and in all lifecycle stages of the product or a service.
Seen over the entire product lifecycle, from product development, manufacturing, usage to discards, the largest portion of Atlas Copco's environmental footprint is in the use of its products, with energy consumption making the most significant environmental impact. Therefore each product development project has ambitious targets to reduce energy consumption. The objective is to increase customer energy efficiency by 20% by 2020, measured as weighted total energy consumption of the total number of products sold per year. The Group has started to measure customer energy efficiency. There is, however, a large number of products with different characteristics and to consolidate the figures is difficult. Therefore, no Group figure is presented for 2012. As a minimum, products comply with laws and regulations regarding the environmental impact of the products.
Atlas Copco has taken several initiatives to reduce its use of resources and does its utmost, for example, to optimize packing material.
Products such as stationary compressors, drill rigs, hydraulic breakers and industrial tools can be returned, refurbished and resold as used equipment. Used equipment meets the same high standards as when it was new in terms of quality, performance and energy efficiency.
Product responsibility
During the design stage, products are evaluated from a safety and health perspective, including ergonomics. Further, all Atlas Copco products and services come with relevant product, service and safety information. The product and service information required by the Group's procedures for product and service information and labeling covers aspects such as sourcing of components, content such as substances of concern, safe use and disposal of the product. Customer training is included when relevant, to secure safe handling of the products.
In general, Atlas Copco is not directly covered by the EU Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive. However, handheld electric tools and monitoring control instruments are defined to be within the scope. Atlas Copco has a responsibility for the disposal of these products. The Group handles the EU WEEE Directive globally.
Atlas Copco strives to follow laws and regulations regarding safety, health and environmental aspects, product information and labeling. No fines have been paid in 2012 for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services.
Sales and market communication
Atlas Copco's products and services are marketed and sold on the basis of their quality, productivity, price and service level and other legitimate attributes. The divisions are responsible for marketing and communication as well as training of personnel in features and benefits, customer safety and health, product and service labeling and customer privacy and compliance.
Customer conduct
Atlas Copco recognizes the importance of safeguarding its reputation by working with customers who adhere to the same standards for environmental, ethical and social responsibility. The Group continues to build awareness of its ethical guidelines. The customer sustainability assessment tool will be globally launched in 2013. This tool is already in use in cases of financing by credit export agencies.
Customer loyalty
To measure customer loyalty, the Group makes customer satisfaction surveys. Every day, and following sales and/or service interactions with Atlas Copco, thousands of customers receive surveys where they are asked to give their opinion. Customers are often contacted and engaged in discussions about their feedback in order to solve problems and to improve products and services. To ensure that customer satisfaction improves a number of key performance indicators have been established and are continuously followed up, e.g. availability of spare parts. The overall results of the surveys indicate an improvement in customer satisfaction during 2012, but also several areas where improvement is needed.
Increase brand awareness
To further expand the market and to measure if the Group is First in Mind—First in Choice® among customers and prospects, Atlas Copco conveys brand awareness surveys on different markets. Based on the results actions are put in place to intensify prospecting and to tailor marketing communications to reach the target groups in an attractive and efficient way. The overall objective is to support the growth and strengthen the positioning on a specific market and/or segment.
Each product development project has ambitious targets to reduce energy consumption.
Customer focused Goals
- First in Mind—First in Choice® for customers and prospects for all brands.
- Increase customer loyalty.
- Increase customer energy efficiency by 20% by 2020.
- Offer safe and reliable products and services.
Customer satisfaction surveys indicate an improvement during 2012.
Employees
Geographical spread of employees Professional category spread of employees Asia/Australia, 28% North America, 14% Africa/Middle East, 7% Europe, 43% South America, 8% Administration, 16% Research and development, 6% Production, 29% Service, 28% Sales and support, 13% Marketing, 8%
Atlas Copco's current and potential employees expect a working environment that sets a high standard for leadership and provides opportunities for each individual to develop professionally. Offering a diverse workplace with good health, safety and labor practices is an important part of Atlas Copco's brand as an employer, and thereby a key success factor for the Group.
Atlas Copco's people management strategy is to attract, develop and keep motivated people, while expecting managers to take responsibility for developing their employees, their organizations and
First in Mind—First in Choice® employer for today's and future employees.
Employee surveys
themselves.
Atlas Copco conducts a Group employee survey at least every second year. Local management follows up on areas needing attention and improvement and holds employee workshops on how to improve where there are weaknesses and capitalize on strengths.
Employer/employee relations
The internal database The Way We Do Things gives employees information on the Group's people management process, including guidance on recruitment, compensation, performance reviews and competence development.
A non-discrimination policy covers all employees. Labor practices such as the right to collective bargaining are included in the Business Code of Practice, which is updated regularly. In 2012, 41% of all employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Business Code of Practice also covers employee rights. In countries where no independent labor union may exist, Atlas Copco has taken measures to establish forums for employer/ employee relations, as in China for example, through environment and safety committees.
Wages and benefits
Atlas Copco's aim is to provide wages and benefits that are fair, consistent and competitive, and in line with industry standards, in order to attract and retain the best people. A fair salary structure is determined through a classification system based
on a specific compensation level for each position, and is benchmarked against similar companies using the same system. For temporary employees, benefits provided are in line with national laws and regulations. This is also valid regarding minimum wages and the minimum notice period in cases of operational changes.
Leadership
Atlas Copco aims to develop managers that have the courage to lead and the engagement to develop committed collaborators. All managers and employees must live and breathe the Atlas Copco values: interaction, commitment and innovation. Leadership and people management trainings, including special training for service managers and team leaders, are continuously conducted with the ambition to improve efficiency and processes.
Atlas Copco strives to have managers that reflects the global structure and requirements. The long-term ambition is to develop local leaders. In 2012, a total of 64% (67) of all senior managers were locally employed. Among the 371 most senior managers 49 nationalities are represented.
The role of the international managers is both to develop local leaders and to get international professional experience for even more demanding positions within the Group. Overall, Atlas Copco has managers on international assignments coming from 55 countries and working in 61. The share of Swedish managers on international assignments has decreased from 23% in 2001 to 14% in 2012.
The proportion of women in management positions increased to 15.1% (14.6). To increase the proportion, Group policy states that when recruiting managers to positions where a university degree is required there must always be at least one female candidate. Atlas Copco's high-level women's mentorship program runs in its fourth consecutive year. The global Atlas Copco women's network supports women's development in the Group.
Management resourcing and recruitment
Competent and committed managers are crucial for realizing the strategy of the Group. The Atlas Copco management resourcing strategy is to have a
survey replies 85%
In 2012, more than 32 000 employees, or 85%, replied to the employee survey. The share of employees that are proud to work for Atlas Copco increased to 82% (77) compared to the previous survey in 2010. The results showed that the Group is a strong and customer focused company, and that employees have a clear understanding of strategies and goals. A need for improvement was identified in the areas of leadership responsibilities,
engagement and motivation.
flow of potential leaders within the Group striving towards more and more challenging positions, thereby safeguarding recruitment to management positions.
Internal mobility is a way to increase efficiency and employee motivation, and to avoid stagnation in the organization. When a manager has fulfilled his/her mission, he/she will seek a new mission either in the existing position or in a new position. The target is to have 85% of managers internally recruited, and the outcome in 2012 was 86%.
Atlas Copco employees are encouraged and supported to grow professionally by applying for open positions internally through the Internal Job Market, which was created in 1992. In 2012, 3 759 positions were advertised, of which 461 were international.
Competence mapping is done extensively to establish resource needs, particularly in core areas. External recruitment of young high-potential employees is focused through active promotion of the Atlas Copco employer brand.
Equality, fairness and diversity
Equal opportunities, fairness and diversity are fundamental pillars of Atlas Copco's people management process. The company aims to have a workforce that reflects the local recruitment base comprising all cultures, religions and nationalities.
The goal is to increase diversity in both nationality and gender. Greater diversity fosters an international mindset, stimulates innovation, and improves the ability to work cross culturally and expand into new markets. It also gives a better understanding of the societies in which Atlas Copco operates. A key success factor of this strategy is to encourage diversity and to integrate the Group's basic beliefs and values with the local culture.
Atlas Copco companies establish local diversity policies and guidelines in alignment with Group
policy, local laws and regulations, and local ambitions. This can include options regarding reduction of working time for childcare or educational leave.
Diversity remains a challenge and is addressed through initiatives such as the launch of a program with short-term assignments abroad to increase competence development and diversity, mentorship programs, a global network and policies. The Group mainly recruits employees from the local communities where it operates.
In 2012, the ratio of women was 16.9% (16.8). The small increase is explained by focused activities to increase the number of women in all positions. The proportion of female recent graduates recruited during the year among white-collar workers was 26%.
Competence development
Competence development is crucial to attracting and keeping satisfied employees. The goal is to ensure competence development and coaching for every employee. They should receive the training and coaching needed to achieve good results, including on-the-job-training and an appraisal each year, regardless of professional category.
In 2012, the average number of training hours per employee was 42 (45) hours and 83% (84) of all employees had an appraisal.
Workshops and seminars help implement Group policies and processes. All employees receive training in The Way We Do Things, the Group's single most important management tool. All employees should also receive training in the Business Code of Practice. In 2012, approximately 90% of Atlas Copco employees had undergone this training.
Business areas provide targeted skill-based training in accordance with the organization's needs. One important area is value-based sales training, in which an understanding of the product
AWARDed in hungary
Atlas Copco Hungary received "Best Workplace for Women" award.
Proportion of appraisals among employees
Atlas Copco runs a two and a half year apprenticeship program in South Africa. See page 51.
internal mobility
and the customer's application is essential. Language training, primarily English, is frequently held in order to facilitate easy communication throughout the organization.
One measure of success of the focus on competence building within Atlas Copco is the percentage of employees with a university degree. In 2012, 52% of the white-collar employees had a university degree.
Mobility and employee turnover
Atlas Copco's goal is to encourage mobility, across geographical, organizational and cultural boundaries. This is important for developing competence, but also for successful integration of newly acquired companies. Experienced managers in senior positions lead the integration process and make it possible to establish the Group's Business Code of Practice, values and vision in an efficient and pragmatic manner. In 2012, internal mobility among employees was 8.2% (9.3). Overall external recruitment reached 15%, excluding acquisitions. Employee turnover was 8% (8).
Safety and health
Atlas Copco aims to offer a safe and healthy working environment in all its operations, for all stakeholders. The Group has a global Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) policy. The ambition is that all employees will work in a company with a SHE management system and that major Group companies are certified in accordance with the international standard OHSAS 18001 by 2013. Further, the goals are to have no work-related accidents and to have a sick leave level below 2.5%.
To highlight the significance of safety, an interactive e-learning module is available to all employees. An important part of product and application trainings is related to safety and there have been several dedicated training sessions. In addition, the business areas have been running 'Safety First' campaigns globally in their areas of responsibility. To further stress the importance, safety and health is the first point on the agenda of company review meetings.
Atlas Copco companies design health and wellness programs to meet the specific needs of their country or region. The HIV/AIDS pandemic is a major concern in some countries where Atlas Copco operates. Since 2002 the Group has been running wellness programs in many Sub-Saharan countries. These programs include testing, awareness training as well as consultations and treatments for those who are diagnosed HIV positive. In the United States diabetes is a growing concern and employees are offered wellness programs including consultation and medication.
In 2012, 72% of the product companies and major customer centers were certified according to OHSAS 18001, which corresponds to 69% of all employees.
During the year the number of accidents increased to 391 (370). The Group takes the increase seriously and promptly addresses the issue with the concerned entities. In relative terms there was a decrease to 5.4 (5.7) accidents per one million working hours. Sadly, Atlas Copco had three fatalities during the year. Safety awareness training and safety communication increased even further after these tragic incidents. Sick leave was at 2.1% (2.0).
No. of accidents per one million of hours worked
Business partners
When products carry an Atlas Copco brand, the policy is that the same high standards for the environment, labor and human rights should be met at business partners such as suppliers, sub-contractors and joint venture partners. The Group therefore has a process in place for managing and monitoring its supply chain, recognizing that business partners play an integral role in achieving the Atlas Copco's goals.
The Group goal is to work with business partners committed to high ethical, environmental and social standards. Working with suppliers to improve performance in these aspects plays a crucial role in safeguarding the reputation and brand for Atlas Copco.
There are three focus areas for evaluating suppliers' performance in social and environmental responsibility:
- Business partners' adherence to a 10-point checklist that Atlas Copco has developed based on the UN Global Compact and the International Labour Organization's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and published on the Atlas Copco website.
- The use of Atlas Copco lists of substances of concern.
- Atlas Copco encourages all business partners to implement a safety, health and environmental management system.
The Group's purchasing process is decentralized and managed in the divisions. However, local purchasing (non-core) is mostly carried out by individual companies. Atlas Copco promotes local purchasing since it benefits the region where the Group operates and also facilitates close relationships with local partners to capitalize on opportunities to further improve quality and efficiency, and decrease environmental impact.
Group companies select and evaluate business partners partly on the basis of their commitment to social and environmental performance. Minimizing the risk of violations of the Atlas Copco Business Code of Practice is in focus when selecting and evaluating a business partner.
Business partners are evaluated during and after selection. The supplier evaluation process includes for example the business partner's use of energy and related CO2 emissions, water use, respect of human rights and labor practices. At times selfassessment checklists are sent to suppliers. On-site evaluations are conducted either at regular intervals or when deemed necessary. These result in a report with concrete suggestions for improvement to be followed up on at an agreed time. Where business
partners' operations indicate a potential conflict with the Business Code of Practice, improvement plans can be agreed upon and Atlas Copco can provide experience and know-how.
Training
The internal training on supplier evaluations is published in the Group database The Way We Do Things. Training is given on a worldwide basis.
An e-learning for business partners has been developed and launched on the Atlas Copco website. The aim is to raise awareness of the Business Code of Practice. Business partners such as significant suppliers of direct material are encouraged to take the training either online or during supplier visits.
Performance from supplier evaluations
Group companies report quantitative data on evaluated, approved and rejected suppliers and those requiring further improvement in their practices. A supplier is considered approved if Atlas Copco has performed an assessment at the supplier's site and reported that there is no risk of violating the Code, or that the supplier has acted on all development suggestions from a previous evaluation. The work on supplier evaluations takes place primarily in the product companies.
Prohibited or restricted substances
Atlas Copco maintains lists of substances which are either prohibited or restricted due to their potential negative impact on health or the environment. Prohibited substances are not allowed in the Group's products or processes. Restricted substances are not yet legally excluded for use but should be replaced according to a plan that takes into account technical and financial aspects. Suppliers' use of such substances is regularly checked, and if prohibited substances should be found, they must immediately be replaced with approved alternatives. The lists are continuously revised according to applicable legislation, including REACH. The lists on prohibited and restricted substances are published on the Atlas Copco website.
Conflict minerals
Atlas Copco is a supplier to customers required to report on the Dodd Frank Act, section 1502 in the United States. This means that the Group must ensure that its products and components are free from conflict minerals. This initiative was already started during the year and will continue in the coming years.
Society
managers trained in the business code of practice*
Distribution of direct economic value
Employees, 22%
* In-depth class-room training in ethics for managers
The Atlas Copco Business Code of Practice
… is translated into 26 languages and available to all employees and business partners. The Code was updated in 2012 primarily in regards of human rights and corruption.
hotline
Possible violations of the Code were reported through the hotline during 2012. The nature of the violations was related to organizational changes, economic issues, and personal issues. Activities to address the reports include internal audits, job rotation and communication.
Given its global reach Atlas Copco has an influence on the economic and social development of the countries in which it operates. The Group is expected to demonstrate that influence in a positive way and strive to be a good and reliable corporate citizen creating shared value.
In the long-term, sound business practices are economically profitable since business is more efficient and establishes the Group's reputation as a reliable and trustworthy partner that conducts business with integrity. From a short-term perspective, following Atlas Copco's principles could have an adverse impact on some business opportunities.
Corruption and anti-competitive behavior
Corruption has very negative global consequences and is both a cause of poverty and a barrier to overcoming it. The Atlas Copco Group does not accept corruption. This basic rule strengthens the brand and helps contribute to fair market competition.
Prevent, detect, react
Not accepting corruption may sound simple. However, being a global company that operates in many cultures with different norms means that it is a demanding challenge. The goal of no corruption or bribes is supported by a policy, procedures, training and monitoring process. The Business Code of Practice clearly states zero tolerance of corruption, including facilitation payments. Firm action will be taken on a case-by-case basis. There will be no negative consequences for employees refusing to receive or pay bribes. Internal control procedures are set up to minimize the risk of corruption and bribes, e.g. segregation of duty. Internal audits include compliance to the Business Code of Practice. Awareness of, and compliance with, principles of integrity in all business dealings is a priority for Atlas Copco.
The Group hotline can be used by employees to report behavior or actions that are, or may be perceived as, violations of laws or of the Business Code of Practice. It serves as a complement to similar processes on country level. The Group Legal department is responsible for managing the hotline and ensures that reports are treated confidentially. The person reporting is guaranteed anonymity.
Training
The Business Code of Practice is given to all new employees and training is provided globally. Managers also receive in-depth classroom training with dilemma cases. The training on corruption developed by the UN Global Compact was taken by 3 500 managers before signing the Business Code of Practice compliance statement.
Anti-corruption principles The work to fight corruption is guided by the following principles, which apply to all employees, managers and the Board of Directors:
Regarding legal compliance
Following laws and regulations, in every country in which the Group operates, is a minimum requirement. In situations where the law does not give guidance, the Group applies its own values and standards.
Regarding relationships with business partners and customers
Atlas Copco must not offer agents, distributors, customers, potential customers, governments any rewards or benefits in violation of either applicable law or reasonable and generally accepted business practice.
Atlas Copco also takes reasonable steps to prevent its business partners from taking part in practices that violate the principles in the Code.
Human rights
Human rights are integrated in Group goals. The work to integrate the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the Children Rights is ongoing. During the year the Business Code of Practice and internal guidelines were updated accordingly. The Group's Human Rights Statement is published on the Atlas Copco website. The work with conflict minerals was started during the year. Atlas Copco will ensure that its products and components are free from conflict minerals and also ask the same from its suppliers. Human rights' awareness training for employees and managers will be launched during 2013.
Through internal control processes Atlas Copco ensures that Group companies have internal processes in place to inform customers and business partners about its human rights policies and to assess possible reputational risks. To date, approximately 70% of Atlas Copco's companies have established these processes.
Atlas Copco's business partners are expected to observe the same high standards regarding human rights as Atlas Copco does.
Due diligence on human rights
A process to assess and manage the social impact of operations on communities and human rights was developed and tested in Ghana and Kazakhstan in 2011. During 2012 the focus has been to further develop the process.
Community engagement and charity
Atlas Copco has long engaged in the societies where it operates. The Group's community and charity initiatives selected and supported by local companies, focus on providing education, a safe upbringing for children, and fighting diseases such as HIV/AIDS and malaria. The Group's Community Engagement and Charity Policy also encourages companies to give support following natural and humanitarian disasters. The support can be products, time or money. Employee-led initiatives are supported by a financial 'matching' principle. Group companies match employee financial donations with company funds. Water for All is recognized as the main initiative of this type of engagement.
The community engagement and charity spend during 2012 was distributed accordingly: cash donations 82%, in kind 4%, and time value 14%.
Development and distribution of economic value
Atlas Copco generated further employment and financial stability through subcontracting manufacturing and other activities. Operating costs including costs to suppliers for goods and services, functional costs deducted for employee wages and benefits amounted to MSEK 53 656 (48 032). Employee wages and benefits paid increased by 14% to MSEK 18 125 (15 910).
The Group's providers of capital, for example shareholders and creditors, provide funds to finance the asset base that is used to create economic value. In turn, these stakeholders receive annual dividend and interest. The costs for providers of capital including dividend, increased by 21% to MSEK 7 167 (5 913).
Atlas Copco contributes to economic development within the regions where it operates, through payments to pension funds and social security, and payments of taxes, social costs and other duties. In 2012, the cost for direct taxes to governments was up 12% to MSEK 4 377 (3 902). Community investments amounted to MSEK 11.7 (17.5).
The economic value retained decreased by 5% to MSEK 8 092 (8 517), as a result of increased dividend and salaries.
Atlas Copco has received requests from stakeholders to be more detailed in its reporting about payments to governments through direct tax.
Water for All
Since 1984, Atlas Copco has supported the voluntary, employee-managed organization Water for All, which raises funds to finance water well drilling activities, sanitation and equipment in order to supply clean drinking water to villages and communities. To date, Water for All has provided access to clean water to more than 1.2 million people. The initiative is established in 19 countries, with more under way.
Visit www.water4all.org for more information.
Environment
Atlas Copco seeks to meet stakeholders' expectations for sound environmental management of its operations and products.
Life-cycle analysis shows that Atlas Copco's most significant environmental impact is related to CO2 emissions during the use of the products. Incorporating environmental considerations into new product design, and continuous product development, is a high priority for Atlas Copco and its customers.
Energy consumption and emissions of CO2 are the most significant environmental indicators, but Atlas Copco also tracks and reports performance on water consumption, materials, and waste.
Environmental compliance
Atlas Copco follows applicable environmental laws in all countries where the Group operates. Incidents or fines are reported for non-compliance with environmental legislation, as well as incidents involving chemical, oil or fuel spillages. In 2012, there were no major incidents reported concerning these aspects.
Five Swedish companies require permits based on Swedish environmental regulations. These operations account for approximately 20% of the Group's manufacturing and mostly involve machining and assembly of components. The permits relate to areas such as emissions to water and air, as well as noise pollution. During 2012, one permit is under revision. The Group has been granted all permits needed to conduct its business. No penalties relating to environmental permits have been imposed during 2012.
Environmental management systems
To help minimize the environmental impact and to secure that the precautionary approach is applied, Atlas Copco has a target to
implement environmental management systems (EMS) in all operations. All product companies must be certified according to ISO 14001. Acquired product companies are normally certified within a two-year period. In 2012, the proportion of product companies with ISO 14001-certification represents 94% of cost of sales and 88% of their employees.
Sustainable construction
Atlas Copco has a goal to construct its buildings according to a sustainable building standard, such as LEED. This regards both new and reconstructed buildings over 2 000 m2. There are Atlas Copco buildings built according to LEED; two in China, one in India and one in the United States. The expected results of the sustainable buildings are reduced environmental impact, reduced maintenance cost and improved working environment for the employees.
Resource use
The Group works continuously to improve resource efficiency in the manufacturing process. The most important raw materials for Atlas Copco are iron and steel, which in terms of weight represents more than 90% of the raw material, used in production and is to great extent recycled steel.
Energy
Group companies invest in increasing energy efficiency, for example, through maintenance of buildings and by improving the manufacturing process. The total energy used in production decreased by 9% in relation to cost of sales. The decrease was due to implementation of more efficient production processes. In 2012, 22% of
Index in relation to cost of sales
A relative decrease in energy consumption is due to investments in more energyefficient solutions.
Energy consumption Water consumption
the energy consumption came from renewable resources such as wind energy and solar panels.
The Group goal of increased customer energy efficiency of 20% by 2020 relates to major product categories. Reporting on the performance in relation to this goal started in 2012. The goal will be achieved by providing customers with innovative energyefficient products and services, which saves both the environment and energy costs. A few examples of these products are presented on the business area pages in this report.
Water
With operations in several countries facing water scarcity, Atlas Copco has started to use water indices to identify operations located in water-risk areas. Group companies in these areas should implement a water risk management plan, from physical, legislative or cost perspectives. Innovative product design also aims to reduce water use when drilling to explore for minerals, for example.
The water withdrawal is disclosed as a total figure. Water consumption decreased by 9% in relation to cost of sales. The relative decrease is partly explained by improved water management.
Emissions and waste
Atlas Copco reports CO2 emissions from direct and indirect energy used in production and from transport to and from production sites. The Group's goal is to reduce the CO2 emissions from the energy used in production by 20% by 2020 in relation to cost of sales. In 2012, CO2 emissions from energy at production sites decreased by 24% in relation to cost of sales. The decrease is primarily due to increased use of renewable energy. The major production site in Belgium uses energy from renewable sources, such as hydroelectricity with lower CO2 emissions.
Atlas Copco is using cooling agents in some products (air dryers) and processes (cooling installations). For products, all cooling agents used have a zero ozone-depleting impact, and the aim is to continue to introduce cooling agents with lower Global Warming
Potential (GWP). The majority of the cooling agents is in closedloop systems in the products and therefore not released during the operational life of the products.
Transport
Transport of goods to and from production is purchased (i.e. Scope 3 emissions as defined in the GHG protocol). The Group goal is to reduce its CO2 emissions from transport by 20% by 2020 in relation to cost of sales. In 2012, the CO2 emissions from transport decreased by 3% in relation to cost of sales. The decrease is primarily due to improved logistics and operational excellence.
The Group continues its efforts to monitor emissions caused by business-related travel. Web-based meetings, telephone and video conferences were used to a high extent.
Waste and hazardous waste
The goal is to avoid creation of waste and that all waste is reused, recycled or recovered. As the main raw material going into the process is steel, scrap metal represents the most significant portion of waste. Practically all of this scrap is reused or recycled.
In 2012, the amount of waste in relation to cost of sales increased by 3% and the proportion of reused, recycled or recovered waste was 92%. There are initiatives to reduce landfill waste, for example through separation of waste in cooperation with recycling companies or the separation of scrap metal from oil before sending it to external recycling.
Hazardous waste in Atlas Copco's operations includes primarily cadmium, beryllium and lead. Atlas Copco tracks various categories of waste from the production process, including regulated (sometimes referred to as hazardous) waste. Restricted substances are not yet legally excluded from use but should be replaced according to a plan that takes into account technical and financial aspects. Prohibited substances are not allowed in the Group's products or processes. Group companies monitor the handling of hazardous waste by business partners.
A relative decrease in CO2 emissions from energy consumption due to the use of more renewable energy.
CO2 emissions from transport
A relative decrease in CO2 emissions primarily due to improved logistics.
Waste
Steps to sustainable, profitable development
Atlas Copco's vision is to become and remain First in Mind—First in Choice® for customers and prospects. In this respect it strives to meet and exceed their productivity and sustainability expectations by providing high-quality innovative products and services and taking economic, environmental and social aspects into consideration in all parts of the value chain. Below are some examples.
Life-cycle analysis
Atlas Copco has a goal to design products and services with a lifecycle perspective so that they are energy efficient and easily recyclable. Designers have for example begun to carry out life-cycle analyses of hand held tools. They found that Atlas Copco tools have a high impact on the environment during the use phase. Furthermore, the selection and reduction of materials used to manufacture some products could also significantly reduce the energy needed to produce them.
Atlas Copco has mapped its global operations in relation to areas that are under water stress or face scarcity using the Global Water Tool by WBCSD. With this tool the Group cannot only adjust its own consumption, but also proactively work to mitigate interruptions in its supply chain that may occur due to water shortages in these specific regions.
Water risk in the supply chain Reducing hazardous waste Sustainable buildings
An Atlas Copco's product company in the US initiated a partnership with a waste company to maximize the reuse and recycling of its waste as well as minimizing hazardous waste and waste to landfill. After two years the company has increased reuse and recycle of waste by 82% and reduction of waste to landfill by 90%.
All new Atlas Copco buildings are constructed according to sustainable building standards such as LEED or comparable criteria. The new R&D center in Nanjing, China was not only built to be energy and resource efficient when in use, but also during the construction with over 20% recycled raw material mostly sourced locally to reduce CO2 emissions from transport.
There's always a better way
By always questioning the way we do things, we work with continuous improvements.
Evaluating energy efficiency Dedicated service divisions More female managers
Atlas Copco in the United States has contributed to the development of independent third-party performance verification for measuring compressors' performance. The program helps compressed air users to evaluate the energy efficiency of compressors in the market. It is an ongoing industry-wide initiative managed by the Compressed Air & Gas Institute.
Since 2012 each Atlas Copco business area has a service division dedicated to supporting customers throughout the lifetime of the products. The divisions have almost 15 000 employees. The service operation offers closer relations to customers and enhanced product development opportunities. It also safeguards that the products operate with the desired energy efficiency and in a highly productive way.
Diversity is a key focus area for Atlas Copco. The Group has seen an increase in the number of female General Managers after focused efforts such as the female mentorship programs, which have been running annually since 2009 and the Group's global women's business network, launched three years ago.
Energy-efficient blower
With a savings goal set at 25% for the Danish wastewater industry, optimizing all parts of the operation, including the aeration, a wastewater treatment plant in Denmark, recently replaced one of its 75 kW lobe blowers with a new 55 kW Atlas Copco ZS screw blower and was able to reduce its energy consumption by 31%.
Safety program in Hungary
Atlas Copco has a successful safety and health culture in the production unit for industrial tools in Hungary. The Near Miss Program, where employees have to report every single accident, incident, and near miss has run since 2011. By identifying potential risks and by continuous improvements the lost days due to injuries can be minimized. No lost time injuries were reported in 2012.
Atlas Copco has initiated a project across business areas to develop its future logistics model. The project focuses on improved customer satisfaction, increased efficiency in the operations, reduced total logistics costs and meeting sustainability targets. The responsibilities have been localized, for example team members in Russia have their responsibilities based on the main logistics functional areas: sales and purchase order administration, inbound shipping and customs, warehousing, customer support and branch logistics. As a result the operation is already more efficient.
Lean distribution Apprenticeship program
Since 2007 Atlas Copco in South Africa has had a two-and-a-half year apprenticeship program, which offers an opportunity to learn by spending time working under the guidance of a skilled, qualified artisan. After the program each apprentice undergoes a test at an accredited center, and if successful they are certified as an artisan. Atlas Copco has completed training 55 apprentices and currently has 87 apprentices in the program.
Autonomous mining equipment
Atlas Copco offers high-tech solutions that make it possible for mining equipment to operate autonomously with remote control and monitoring. The equipment, equipped with computerized control systems, GPS and scanners, offer increased safety and productivity.
The Atlas Copco share
Highlights 2012
- ➔ The Atlas Copco share price increased by 20.5%
- ➔ Proposed dividend up by 10% to SEK 5.50 per share
- ➔ MEUR 500 bond issued in March
- ➔ Moody's upgraded credit rating to A2
Shareholders by country, December 31, 2012, percent of capital
Share price development and returns
During 2012, the price of the A share increased by 20.5% to SEK 178.30 (148). The annual total return on the Atlas Copco A share, equal to dividend, redemption and the appreciation of the share price, was on average 26.5% for the past 10 years and 17.2% for the past five years. The corresponding total return for NASDAQ OMX Stockholm was 12.6% (2003–2012) and 3.5% (2008–2012), respectively.
Trading
The trading of the Atlas Copco AB shares primarily takes place on NASDAQ OMX Stockholm, where Atlas Copco shares were the 3rd (4th) most actively traded shares in 2012. The market capitalization at year end was MSEK 208 526 (172 630), excluding shares held by Atlas Copco. Atlas Copco represented 5.4% (5.0) of the total market value of NASDAQ OMX Stockholm.
Trading in Atlas Copco shares also takes place on other markets, so called Multilateral Trading Facilities (MTF), e.g. BATS Chi-X Europe, Turquoise and Burgundy. These account for some 20% of total trading. Additionally, the Atlas Copco share is traded outside public markets, for example through over-the-counter trading, which accounts for 35–40 % of the total trading.
Dividend
The Board of Directors proposes to the AGM that a dividend of SEK 5.50 (5.00) per share be paid for the 2012 fiscal year. This corresponds to 48% (47) of earnings per share and a total of MSEK 6 674 (6 058) if the shares held by the company are excluded.
If the shareholders approve the Board of Directors' proposal for a dividend of SEK 5.50 per share, the annual dividend growth for the five-year period 2008–2012 will equal 12.9%. During the same period, the dividend has averaged 48% of basic earnings per share.
ADRs in the United States
A program for American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) was established in the United States in 1990. Since then, both A and B shares are available as ADRs in the United States without being formally registered on a United States stock exchange. One ADR corresponds to one share. The depositary bank is Citibank N.A. At year end 2012, there were 8 090 330 ADRs outstanding, of which 6 230 931 represented A shares and 1 859 399 B shares.
Share price
Atlas Copco options
Call options, put options, and futures each linked with 100 Atlas Copco A shares, are listed on NASDAQ OMX Stockholm. In 2012, 1 526 362 (1 039 829) option contracts were traded. Since the options grant the holder the right to buy or sell existing shares only, they have no dilution effect.
Personnel stock option program and repurchase of own shares
The Board of Directors will propose to the AGM 2013 a similar performance-based long-term incentive program as in previous years. The intention is to cover the plan through the repurchase of the company's own shares. For further information on the option programs and repurchase of own shares please see notes 5 and 20. The company's holding of own shares on December 31, 2012 appears in the table below.
Symbols and tickers
| A share | B share | |
|---|---|---|
| NASDAQ OMX Stockholm | ATCO A | ATCO B |
| ISIN code | SE0000101032 | SE0000122467 |
| Reuters | ATCOa.ST | ATCOb.ST |
| Bloomberg | ATCOA SS | ATCOB SS |
| ADR | ATLKY.OTC | ATLCY.OTC |
Distribution of shares, December 31, 2012
| Class of share | Shares outstanding |
% of votes | % of capital |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 839 394 096 | 95.6 | 68.3 |
| B | 390 219 008 | 4.4 | 31.7 |
| Total | 1 229 613 104 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Whereof A-shares held by Atlas Copco | 15 372 649 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| Whereof B-shares held by Atlas Copco | 818 280 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total, net of shares held by Atlas Copco | 1 213 422 175 |
For more information on the distribution of shares see note 20.
Investor relations
Atlas Copco's investor relations department is to provide the financial community with high quality and accurate information about the Atlas Copco Group.
For further information, please visit www.atlascopco.com/ir or send an e-mail to [email protected].
Important dates in 2013–2014
| 2013 | |
|---|---|
| April 29 A | nnual General Meeting Q1 – first quarter results 2013 |
| April 30 | Shares trade excluding right to dividend* |
| May 8 | Dividend distribution date* |
| July 18 | Q2 – second quarter results 2013 |
| October 25 | Q3 – third quarter results 2013 |
| November 20 | Capital Markets Day |
| 2014 | |
| January 30 | Preliminary 2013 report Q4 – fourth quarter results 2013 |
| March A | nnual Report 2013 |
| *Board of Directors proposal to the AGM |
Earnings and distribution per share
Market capitalization
Redemption of shares, SEK
Ownership structure
At year end 2012, Atlas Copco had 69 272 (71 379) shareholders. The ten largest shareholders registered directly or as a group with Euroclear Sweden, the Swedish Central Securities Depository, by voting rights, accounted for 33% (34) of the voting rights and 33% (33) of the number of shares. Non-Swedish investors held 49% (48) of the shares and represented 52% (51) of the voting rights.
Ownership structure, December 31, 2012
| Number of shares | Number of shareholders |
% of share holders |
% of capital |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–500 | 39 859 | 57.5 | 0.6 |
| 501–2 000 | 18 851 | 27.2 | 1.7 |
| 2 001–10 000 | 8 234 | 11.9 | 2.8 |
| 10 001–50 000 | 1 563 | 2.3 | 2.6 |
| 50 001–100 000 | 227 | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| >100 000 | 538 | 0.8 | 91.0 |
| 69 272 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Atlas Copco in sustainability ratings
Atlas Copco was included in the following sustainability ratings in 2012:
- Global 100, www.global100.org
- Dow Jones Sustainability World and Europe Indexes, www.sustainability-indexes.com
- FTSE4Good Global Index, www.ftse.com
- STOXX® Global ESG Leaders indexes STOXX, www.stoxx.com
- GS Sustain focus list by Goldman Sachs, www.gs.com
- MSCI World ESG Index and MSCI World Socially Responsible Index, www.msci.com
- Folksam Environmental Index (4.1) and Folksam Human Rights Index (4.0), www.folksam.se
- SPP's investment fund Global Top 100, www.spp.se
- Ethibel PIONEER and Ethibel EXCELLENCE Investment Registers, www.ethibel.org
number of shareholders
ATLAS COPCO AB DEBT
Structure
All external borrowings for Atlas Copco AB are handled by Group Treasury. Group Treasury is responsible for ensuring that each legal unit in the Atlas Copco Group has access to adequate financing on acceptable terms. To ensure access to funding in different currencies and maturities, Atlas Copco AB has several different debt programs outstanding such as commercial papers, Euro Medium Term Notes (EMTN) and a committed credit facility.
Market information
In March Atlas Copco AB issued a MEUR 500 bond at 2.625%. The bond expires in 2019. Furthermore, Atlas Copco AB repurchased nominal MEUR 255 of bonds maturing in 2014.
Rating
Atlas Copco AB has a long-term debt rating of A2 (A3) from Moody's Investor Service, Inc. and A (A) from Standard & Poor's Corporation. Moody's Investor's Service upgraded Atlas Copco AB to A2 from A3 in November, 2012. See also note 21 for more information about the Group's borrowings and note A17 for more information about Atlas Copco AB's borrowings.
Maturity structure, excluding back-up facilities, December 31, 2012
Long-term debt rating A2/A
Moody's / S&P
10 largest shareholders*, December 31, 2012
| Number of shares | A shares | B shares | % of votes | % of capital | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investor AB | 206 895 611 | 194 803 726 | 12 091 885 | 22.3 | 16.8 |
| Swedbank | 53 630 131 | 22 754 104 | 30 876 027 | 2.9 | 4.4 |
| Alecta | 34 238 000 | 13 750 000 | 20 488 000 | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| AP 4 | 13 776 939 | 9 105 172 | 4 671 767 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| SEB Investment Management | 14 894 443 | 8 322 272 | 6 572 171 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Handelsbanken | 13 965 552 | 8 090 779 | 5 874 773 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Folksam | 10 472 630 | 6 741 873 | 3 730 757 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| AMF | 32 689 870 | 4 238 350 | 28 451 520 | 0.8 | 2.7 |
| AP 1 | 11 518 923 | 6 461 271 | 5 057 652 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| AP 2 | 8 040 867 | 5 050 283 | 2 990 584 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Others | 829 490 138 | 560 076 266 | 269 413 872 | 66.8 | 67.5 |
| Total | 1 229 613 104 | 839 394 096 | 390 219 008 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| – of which shares held by Atlas Copco | 16 190 929 | 15 372 649 | 818 280 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| Total, net of shares held by Atlas Copco | 1 213 422 175 | 824 021 447 | 389 400 728 |
* Shareholders registered directly or as a group with Euroclear Sweden, the Swedish Central Securities Depository.
Key figures per share
| SEK | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Average growth, five years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic earnings | 8.33 | 5.14 | 8.16 | 10.68 | 11.45 | 13.5% |
| Diluted earnings | 8.33 | 5.13 | 8.15 | 10.62 | 11.43 | |
| Dividend | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 5.501) | 12.9% |
| Dividend as % of basic earnings | 36.0% | 58.4% | 49.0% | 46.8% | 48.0% | |
| Dividend yield % | 3.5% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 3.1% | |
| Redemption of shares | 5.00 | |||||
| Operating cash flow | 3.90 | 11.32 | 7.98 | 5.18 | 10.08 | 21.8% |
| Equity per share | 20 | 21 | 24 | 24 | 29 | |
| Share price, December 31, A share | 67 | 105 | 170 | 148 | 178 | 12.9% |
| Share price, December 31, B share | 60 | 93 | 152 | 131 | 158 | 12.4% |
| Highest price quoted, A share | 113 | 107 | 173 | 177 | 179 | |
| Lowest price quoted, A share | 49 | 55 | 96 | 123 | 138 | |
| Average price quoted, A share | 86 | 81 | 123 | 148 | 159 | |
| Average number of shares, millions | 1 219.1 | 1 215.9 | 1 215.9 | 1 214.3 | 1 213.8 | |
| Diluted average number of shares, millions | 1 219.8 | 1 216.3 | 1 217.3 | 1 217.3 | 1 215.6 | |
| Number of shareholders, December 31 | 55 976 | 61 645 | 69 275 | 71 379 | 69 272 | |
| Market capitalization, December 31, MSEK | 78 350 | 123 440 | 199 921 | 172 630 | 208 526 |
1) Proposed by the Board of Directors.
No adjustment has been made for the redemption of shares in accordance with the recommendation from The Swedish Society of Financial Analysts.
To adjust historic figures also for the redemption of shares, use factor 0.98.
Share issues 2003–20121)
| Change of share capital, MSEK |
Amount paid/ distributed, MSEK |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Split | 4:1 quota value SEK 1.25 | ||
| Share redemption | 209 602 184 shares at SEK 20 | –262.0 | –4 192.0 | |
| 2007 | Split | 3:1 quota value SEK 0.417 | ||
| Share redemption 2) | 628 806 552 shares at SEK 40 | –262.0 | –24 415.7 | |
| Bonus issue | No new shares issued, quota value SEK 0.625 | 262.0 | ||
| Redemption of shares held by Atlas Copco | 28 000 000 shares | –17.5 | ||
| Bonus issue | No new shares issued, quota value SEK 0.639 | 17.5 | ||
| 2011 | Split | 2:1 quota value SEK 0.320 | ||
| Share redemption 3) | 1 229 613 104 shares at SEK 5 | –393.0 | –6 067.0 | |
| Bonus issue | No new shares issued, quota value SEK 0.639 | 393.0 |
1) For information before 2003 please visit www.atlascopco.com/ir
2) 610 392 352 shares net of shares held by Atlas Copco.
3) 1 213 493 751 shares net of shares held by Atlas Copco.
Corporate governance
Atlas Copco AB is incorporated under the laws of Sweden with a public listing at NASDAQ OMX Stockholm AB (OMX Stockholm). Reflecting this, the corporate governance of Atlas Copco is based on Swedish legislation and regulations: primarily the Swedish Companies Act, but also the rules of OMX Stockholm, the Swedish Corporate Governance Code, the Articles of Association and other relevant rules. The operational structure and management is described on pages 6–8.
Important events in 2012
- ➔ Election of Peter Wallenberg Jr as new Board member
- ➔ Håkan Osvald joined Group Management as General Counsel
More information on corporate governance
The following information is available at www.atlascopco.com:
- ➔ Corporate governance reports since 2004
- ➔ Atlas Copco's Articles of Association
- ➔ An item-by-item report on Atlas Copco's compliance with the Swedish Corporate Governance Code
- ➔ Business Code of Practice
- ➔ Information on Atlas Copco's Annual General Meeting
The Swedish Corporate Governance Code is available at www.corporategovernanceboard.se
Shareholders
At year end 2012, Atlas Copco had 69 272 (71 379) shareholders. Swedish investors held 51% (52) of the shares and represented 48% (49) of the voting rights. The ten largest shareholders registered directly or as a group with Euroclear Sweden, the Swedish Central Securities Depository, by voting rights, accounted for 33% (34) of the voting rights and 33% (33) of the number of shares. The largest shareholder is Investor AB, holding 17% of capital and 22% of votes. A significant share of the Atlas Copco shares held by foreign investors is held in custody, where the investor cannot be identified. More information on Atlas Copco's shareholders is found n the chapter The Atlas Copco share, pages 52–55.
Annual General Meeting (AGM)
The AGM is the event where the shareholders may exercise their voting rights in a number of important issues, such as election of Board members, approval of financial statements, discharge of liability for the President and CEO and the Board, and adoption of the proposed distribution of profits.
The AGM shall be held within six months of the close of the financial year. All shareholders registered in the shareholders' register who have given due notification to the company of their intention to attend may attend the meeting and vote for their total
Annual General Meeting 2013
The Annual General Meeting of Atlas Copco AB will be held in Stockholm, Sweden, on April 29, 2013.
How to contact the Board of Directors
If a shareholder wishes to submit questions or for other reason wants to get in contact with the Board, please contact: Atlas Copco AB, Att: General Counsel, SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden, or e-mail: [email protected]
shareholdings. Shareholders who cannot participate personally may be represented by proxy holders and a proxy form is made available for the shareholders. A shareholder or a proxy holder may be accompanied by two assistants.
At the AGM held on April 27, 2012 in Stockholm, Sweden, shareholders representing 64.6% of the total number of votes in the company and 62.8% of the shares attended. Decisions at the AGM 2012 included:
- • adoption of the income statements and balance sheets of the parent company and the Group and the Board's proposal for profit distribution with a dividend of SEK 5 per share
- • discharge of liability for the President and CEO and the Board
- • resolution of the Board of Directors'fee
- • election of nine directors of the Board, including Peter Wallenberg Jr as new Board member
- • adoption of guidelines for remuneration to Group management
The details of the AGM are available at: atlascopco.com/AGM
Governance structure
Nomination Committee
A Nomination Committee is appointed by the major shareholders in accordance with procedures adopted by the AGM 2012.
In compliance with the Swedish Corporate Governance Code and the adopted procedures, the representatives of the four largest shareholders, listed in the shareholders' register as of September 30, together with the Chair of the Board, Sune Carlsson, formed the Nomination Committee for the AGM 2013:
- • Petra Hedengran, Investor AB (chair)
- • Jan Andersson, Swedbank Robur
- • Ramsay Brufer, Alecta Pensionsförsäkring, mutual
- • Arne Lööw, Fourth Swedish National Pension Fund
- • Sune Carlsson, Atlas Copco AB
The members of the Nomination Committee were announced on October 22, 2012. The Nomination Committee members represented some 28% of all votes in the company.
The Nomination Committee prepares a proposal regarding Chair of the AGM number of Board members, names of the proposed Board members, as well as Chair and Vice Chair of the Board. Further, it also submits its proposal for remuneration to the Chair, the Vice Chair and other Board members not employed by the company, as well as a proposal for remuneration for Board committee work. The various proposals will be published at the latest with the notice to the AGM 2013.
Sune Carlsson has presented to the Nomination Committee his views on Atlas Copco's development and its strategies. He has also described the Board's working procedures and added his comments in respect of the various Board members' contributions. Based on that information and interviews with Board members the Nomination Committee has evaluated the Board's work, competence and composition, including the background, experience, and diversity of the Board members.
The members of the Nomination Committee receives no compensation for their work in the Nomination Committee.
Shareholders who wish to contact the Nomination Committee can do so via e-mail: [email protected]
External auditor
At the AGM 2010 the audit firm Deloitte AB, Sweden was elected external auditor until the 2014 AGM in compliance with a proposal from the Nomination Committee. Jan Berntsson, Authorized Public Accountant, is the principal auditor.
At the AGM 2012, Jan Berntsson recommended adoption of the presented income statements and balance sheets, discharge of liability for the President and CEO and the Board, and adoption of the proposed appropriation of profits.
Board of Directors
The Board of Directors is overall responsible for the organization, administration and management of Atlas Copco's operations. Besides the general distribution of responsibilities that apply in accordance with the Swedish Companies Act, the Board and its committees have updated and re-adopted the rules of procedure and written instructions at each statutory meeting since 1999.
The Rules of Procedure primarily provide information on:
- The minimum number of Board meetings per year, as well as when and where they are to be held.
- The President's authority to sign quarterly reports for quarter one and three.
- The Board of Directors' delegation of authority to prepare matters for decision by the Board.
- Items normally to be included in the agenda for each Board meeting, e.g. a financial status report, business development
from a financial and operative perspective, acquisitions and divestments of business operations, decisions on investments exceeding MSEK 50, changes in the legal organization, followup of acquisitions, and appointments.
- When Board documentation is to be available prior to every meeting.
- Identification of the Chair's major tasks.
- Keeping of Minutes.
- Appointment of the Remuneration Committee and the Audit Committee and the identification of the respective committees' major tasks.
- The Board's right to receive vital information, the right to make statements on behalf of the company, and the obligation to observe confidentiality.
The Written Instructions, which regulate the distribution of tasks between the Board and the President and the company's reporting processes, particularly when it comes to financial reports, deal primarily with:
- • The President's responsibility for daily operations, corporate responsibility and for maintaining both the company's operative (business), as well as legal (owner) structure.
- The structure and the contents in the database The Way We Do Things, which covers principles, guidelines, processes and instructions of the Atlas Copco Group. The Way We Do Things is the Group's single most important management tool, and – for example – contains a detailed plan for all accounting and financial reporting within the company.
- Issues that always require a Board decision or an application to the Board, such as quarterly reports, major investments, changes of the legal structure and certain appointments.
- The order in which the Senior Executive Vice Presidents are to serve in the President's absence.
- The external auditor's reporting to the Board upon completion of the yearly audit.
Board members
The Board of Directors consists of nine elected Board members, including the President and CEO. The Board also has two union members, each with one personal deputy. Atlas Copco fulfilled the 2012 requirements of the OMX Stockholm and the rules of the Swedish Corporate Governance Code regarding independency of board members, which secures that conflicts of interest are avoided. All Board members have participated in the training sessions arranged by OMX Stockholm.
The Board of Directors' work
During the year, the Board has continuously addressed the strategic direction, the financial performance, and the methods to maintain sustainable profitability of the Atlas Copco Group. Corporate responsibility issues were covered, with a special focus on safety and health. Major issues dealt with by the Board during the year include the follow-up of measures to adapt production, cost development and the development of the world economy.
The Board had seven meetings in 2012, five times at Atlas Copco AB in Nacka, Sweden, one per capsulam and one in Charlotte, North Carolina, the United States. All meetings of the Remuneration and Audit Committees have been reported to the Board and the corresponding Minutes have been distributed. Håkan Osvald, General Counsel and Board secretary as well as Hans Ola Meyer, CFO, have been present at all meetings. The four business area presidents Stephan Kuhn, Bob Fassl, Nico Delvaux and Mats Rahmström have been present at one meeting each during the year when they presented in-depth analysis of their respective business areas. Jeanette Livijn, Senior Vice President Organizational Development and Human Resources, and Ken Lagerborg, Group Treasurer, presented the situation in their respective area of responsibility at the April and October meetings.
No dissenting opinions in relation to a decision have been reported in the Minutes during the year. Each Board member has commented on the market/economic development from his/her perspective at the Board meetings.
At the January meeting 2013, the Board evaluated the performance of the President and CEO. At the same meeting the principal auditor, Jan Berntsson, Deloitte, reported his observations from the annual audit 2012; both the September hard close and as of December 31. The Board also had a separate session with the auditor where members of Group Management were not present.
Remuneration to the Board members
The 2012 AGM decided to adopt the Nomination Committee's proposal for remuneration to the Chair and other Board members not employed by the company, and the proposed remuneration for committee work. See also note 5.
- • The Chair received SEK 1 800 000.
- • Each of the other Board members not employed by the company SEK 540 000.
- • An amount of SEK 200 000 was granted to the Chair of the Audit Committee and SEK 125 000 to each of the other three members of this committee.
- • An amount of SEK 60 000 was granted to each one of the three members of the Remuneration Committee and SEK 60 000 to a Board member who participated in additional committee work decided upon by the Board.
- • The AGM further decided that out of the stated fees, 50% of the Board fee could be received in the form of synthetic shares.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee's primary task is to support the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities in the areas of audit and internal control, accounting, financial reporting and risk management as well as to supervise the financial structure and operations of the Group and approve financial guarantees, delegated by the Board. The work of the Audit Committee is directed by the Audit Committee Charter, adopted by the Board in 2003 and reviewed and approved each year, latest in April 2012.
In 2012, the Audit Committee consisted of Board members Ulla Litzén, Chair, Sune Carlsson, Staffan Bohman, and Johan Forssell. The Chair of the committee has the accounting competence required by the Swedish Companies Act and two of the members are independent from the company and its main shareholder. The committee convened six times, five physical meetings and one per telephone. All members were present at all meetings. All physical meetings were also attended by the principal auditor Jan Berntsson and Thomas Strömberg, Deloitte, Atlas Copco's
President and CEO, Ronnie Leten, CFO, Hans Ola Meyer and Vice President Group Internal Audit & Assurance, Anders Björkdahl. The Group Treasurer, Ken Lagerborg and The Chief Information Officer, Mats Högberg participated in one meeting each.
The Audit Committee work in 2012 focused on reviewing quarterly reports, follow-up of the 2011 audit, the auditor's review of the half-year report, and the hard close audit carried out as of September 30. Further, the financial risk exposure and the capital and financial structures and the internal audit and control procedures were regularly reviewed.
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee's primary task is to propose to the Board the remuneration to the President and CEO and its proposal for a long-term incentive plan covering a maximum of 315 key employees.
In 2003, the Board adopted a Remuneration Policy for Group Management aimed at establishing principles for a fair and consistent remuneration with respect to compensation (base pay, variable compensation, any long-term incentive plans), benefits (pension premiums, sickness benefits, and company car), and termination (notice period and severance pay). The base salary is determined by position and performance and the variable compensation is for the achievement of individual goals. The goal with a long-term incentive plan is to align the interests of key personnel with those of the shareholders. The Remuneration Policy is reviewed every year and was presented to the 2012 AGM for approval.
In 2012, the Remuneration Committee consisted of Sune Carlsson, Peter Wallenberg Jr and Anders Ullberg. The Remuneration Committee had one meeting where all members were present. During the year, the Remuneration Committee also supported the President and CEO in determining remuneration to the other members of Group Management.
| Board of Directors |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name Born Function |
Sune Carlsson 1941 Chair of the Board |
Ronnie Leten 1956 Board member President and CEO |
Ulla Litzén 1956 Board member |
Anders Ullberg 1946 Board member |
Staffan Bohman 1949 Board member |
| Education | M.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden |
M.Sc. in Applied Economics, University of Hasselt, Belgium |
M.Sc. in Economics and Business Administration, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden, and MBA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the United States |
M.Sc. in Economics and Business Administration, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden |
M.Sc. in Economics and Business Administration, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden, and Stanford Executive Program, the United States |
| Nationality / Elected | Swedish / 1997 | Belgian / 2009 | Swedish / 1999 | Swedish / 2003 | Swedish / 2003 |
| Board membership |
Board member of the investment company Investor AB, Sweden. |
Vice Chair of the appliance manufacturer Electrolux AB, Sweden. |
Board member of bearing manufacturer AB SKF, the mining company Boliden AB, the industrial compa ny Alfa Laval AB, the con struction company NCC AB and outdoor equip ment company Husqvarna AB, all based in Sweden. |
Chair of the steel whole saler BE Group AB, the mining company Boliden AB, the publishing com pany Natur & Kultur, and the technical services company Studsvik AB. Board member of the aluminum profile company Sapa AB, the investment company Beijer Alma, and the roll manufacturer Åkers AB. Chair of the Swedish Financial Report ing Board. All based in Sweden. |
Chair of the lift manufac turer Cibes Lift AB, Swe den and the hospital- and social welfare organization Ersta Diakoni, Sweden, Vice Chair of Rezidor Hotel Group AB and of the Board of trustees of SNS, Swe den. Board member of the holding company Inter-IKEA Holding N.V., the Netherlands, the pri vate equity company Ratos AB, Sweden, the mining company Boliden AB, Sweden, and member of the Swedish Corporate Governance Board. |
| Principal work experience and other information |
Vice Chair of Scania AB, Sweden, President and CEO of AB SKF, Sweden, and Executive Vice President of ASEA AB, Sweden, and ABB Ltd., Switzerland. |
Business Area President for Atlas Copco Compres sor Technique. Division president for the divisions Airtec and Industrial Air as well as several manage ment positions within IT, logistics, business devel opment and manufac turing in the Compressor Technique business area. All positions in Belgium. |
President of W Capital Management AB, Sweden, and Managing Director and member of the Management Group, Investor AB, Sweden. |
Vice President Corporate Control Swedyards (Celsi us Group), Executive Vice President and CFO, SSAB, Swedish Steel and Presi dent and CEO of SSAB Swedish Steel. All posi tions in Sweden. |
CEO of Sapa AB, Gränges AB and DeLaval AB. All positions in Sweden. |
| Total fees 2012, KSEK 1) | 1 754 | – | 796 | 656 | 729 |
| Board meeting attendance |
7 of 7 Chair |
7 of 7 | 6 of 7 | 7 of 7 | 6 of 7 |
| Remuneration Committee attendance |
1 of 1 Chair |
1 of 1 | |||
| Audit Committee attendance |
6 of 6 | 6 of 6 Chair |
6 of 6 | ||
| Holdings in Atlas Copco AB 2) |
20 000 class A shares, 34 284 class B shares 33 159 synthetic shares |
19 166 class A shares 18 000 class B shares 444 385 synthetic shares/ employee stock options |
75 800 class A shares 3 000 class B shares 8 351 synthetic shares |
14 000 class A shares 10 000 class B shares 8 351 synthetic shares |
10 000 class A shares 30 000 class B shares 10 119 synthetic shares |
| Independence | No3) | No 4) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Annual Meeting attendance |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
1) See note 5 to the consolidated financial statements
2) Holdings as per end of 2012, including those of close relatives or legal entities and grant for 2012.
3) Board member in a company which is a larger owner (Investor AB)
4) President and CEO of Atlas Copco
5) Employed by a company which is a larger owner (Investor AB)
Margareth Øvrum 1958 Board member
M.Sc. in Technical Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Board member of the private equity company Ratos AB, Sweden.
Nationality / Elected Swedish / 1997 Belgian / 2009 Swedish / 1999 Swedish / 2003 Swedish / 2003 Norwegian / 2008 Swedish / 2008 Swedish / 2010 Swedish / 2012
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Johan Forssell 1971 Board member
M.Sc. in Economics and Business Administration, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
Board member of the defense and security company Saab AB, Sweden.
Gunilla Nordström 1959 Board member
M.Sc. in Electronics, Industrial Marketing Management, Linköping University
Board member of the engineering company Wärtsilä Corporation, Finland.
1959 Board member BSBA Hotel Administration, University of Denver, the United States and International
Bachaloria, American School, Leysin, Switzerland.
Chair of Foundation Asset Management Sweden AB, The Grand Group, The Royal Swedish Automobile Club and Kungsträdgården Park & Evenemang AB. Vice Chair of The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. Board member of Aleris Holding AB, Investor AB, Scania AB, SEB Kort Bank AB and Stockholmsmässan AB. All based in Sweden.
Peter Wallenberg Jr
Board members and deputies appointed by the unions
Bengt Lindgren Born 1957 Chair of IF Metall, Atlas Copco Secoroc AB, Fagersta, Sweden Elected 1990 Board meeting attendance 5 of 7
Mikael Bergstedt Born 1960 Chair of PTK, Atlas Copco Tools AB, Tierp, Sweden Elected 2004 Board meeting attendance 5 of 7
Executive vice president for Technology, Procurement, Project execution and Drilling in Statoil. Several leading positions within technology, projects, production, maintenance, health/safety/ environment, and procurement in Statoil. All positions in Norway.
Managing Director, Head of Core Investments and member of the management team of investment company Investor AB, Sweden. Head of Research, Head of Capital Goods and Healthcare sector, Head of Capital Goods sector and Analyst Core Holdings in Investor AB.
President and CEO of Electrolux Major Appliances Asia/Pacific, based in Singapore, and Executive Vice President of Electrolux AB. Senior management positions with telecom equipment company Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Sony Ericsson in Europe, Latin America and Asia.
President and CEO The Grand Hotel Holdings, General Manager The Grand Hotel, President Hotel Division Stockholm-Saltsjön. All positions in Sweden.
Ulf Ström Born 1961 Chair of IF Metall, Atlas Copco Rock Drills AB, Örebro, Sweden Elected 2008 Board meeting attendance 7 of 7
Kristina Kanestad Born 1966 Chair of Unionen, Atlas Copco Rock Drills AB, Örebro, Sweden. Elected 2007 Board meeting attendance 7 of 7
Total fees 2012, KSEK 1) 1 754 – 796 656 729 538 663 471 518 7 of 7 6 of 7 7 of 7 6 of 7 6 of 7 7 of 7 7 of 7 2 of 4 as from AGM 2012 1 of 1 1 of 1 6 of 6 6 of 6 11 741 synthetic shares 5 000 class B shares 11 741 synthetic shares 3 791 synthetic shares 1 768 synthetic shares Independence No3) No 4) Yes Yes Yes Yes No5) Yes No3)
Honorary Chair
Dr. Peter Wallenberg
Econ. Dr. h.c. and Dr. of Laws h.c., Bachelor of Law, University of Stockholm, Sweden. Honorary Chair of the Board of the investment company Investor AB, Sweden. Chair of the Board of the nonprofit Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden. Held various positions within the Atlas Copco Group 1953–1974 and was Chair of the Board 1974–1996.
| Ronnie Leten | Stephan Kuhn | Mats Rahmström | Bob Fassl | Nico Delvaux |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| President and CEO | Senior Executive Vice President for Atlas Copco AB and Business Area President Compressor Technique |
Senior Executive Vice President for Atlas Copco AB and Business Area President Industrial Technique |
Senior Executive Vice President for Atlas Copco AB and Business Area President Mining and Rock Excavation Technique |
Senior Executive Vice President for Atlas Copco AB and Business Area President Construction Technique |
| 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2011 | 2011 |
| Belgian / 1997 | German / 2009 | Swedish / 1988 | Canadian / 1982 | Belgian / 1991 |
| 1956 | 1962 | 1965 | 1962 | 1966 |
| M.Sc. in Applied Economics, University of Hasselt, Belgium. |
MBA from Bentley College in Waltham MA, USA. |
MBA from the Henley Management College, the United Kingdom. |
High school diploma in economics, Eklidens gymnasium, Sweden. |
M.Sc. in Electromechanics from the University of Brussels and an MBA from the Handelshogeschool in Antwerp, Belgium. |
| Business Area President for Atlas Copco Compres sor Technique. Division president for the divisions Airtec and Industrial Air as well as several manage ment positions within IT, logistics, business devel opment and manufac turing in the Compressor Technique business area. All positions in Belgium. Vice Chair of the appliance |
Stephan Kuhn started his career at Atlas Copco in 1995 as manager of an electric tools joint venture in China, and later held General Manager posi tions in Belgium and Ger many. He was President of the Surface Drilling Equip ment division within the former Construction and Mining Technique busi ness area until 2008, when he took a position outside the Group for a short period of time. |
Mats Rahmström has held positions in sales, service, marketing and general management within the Industrial Technique business area. Between 1998 and 2006 he held the position as General Manager for customer centers in Sweden, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Between 2006 and 2008 he was President of the Atlas Copco Tools and Assembly Systems General Industry division within Industrial Technique. |
Bob Fassl held several management positions in Atlas Copco Construction and Mining Technique business area in finance, service, logistics, purchas ing and manufacturing, starting 1982. From 1999 he was General Manager for Atlas Copco Explora tion Products. Between 2004 to 2011 Fassl was Division President for Drill ing Solutions. He has been based in Canada, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. |
Nico Delvaux started his career with Atlas Copco in 1991 and has had positions in sales, marketing, service, acquisition-integration management and general management, in markets including Benelux, Italy, Canada and the United States. Between 2008 and 2011 he was President of the Compressor Technique Service division. |
| manufacturer Electrolux AB, Sweden. |
||||
| 19 166 class A shares 18 000 class B shares 444 385 synthetic shares/ employee stock options |
6 682 class A shares 158 916 synthetic shares/ employee stock options |
6 680 class A shares 158 651 synthetic shares/ employee stock options |
5 151 class A shares 81 077 synthetic shares/ employee stock options |
3 668 class A shares 104 466 synthetic shares/ employee stock options |
1) Holdings as per Dec 31, 2012 including those of close relatives or legal entities, grant for the 2012 program and matching shares. See note 23.
Senior Vice President
Controlling and Finance
Senior Vice President Organizational Development and Human Resources
Senior Vice President General Counsel
Name Ronnie Leten Stephan Kuhn Mats Rahmström Bob Fassl Nico Delvaux Hans Ola Meyer Jeanette Livijn Håkan Osvald Annika Berglund
Senior Vice President Corporate Communications
| 2008 2011 2011 1999 2007 2012 |
1997 |
|---|---|
| Swedish / 1988 Canadian / 1982 Belgian / 1991 Swedish / 1991 Swedish / 1987 Swedish / 1985 |
Swedish / 1979 |
| 1962 1966 1955 1963 1954 |
1954 |
| MBA from the Henley High school diploma in M.Sc. in Electromechanics M.Sc. in Economics and M.Sc. in Business Master of Law from Upp Management College, economics, Eklidens from the University of Business Administration Administration from Växjö sala University, Sweden. the United Kingdom. gymnasium, Sweden. Brussels and an MBA from from Stockholm School of högskola, Sweden. the Handelshogeschool in Economics in Stockholm, Antwerp, Belgium. Sweden. |
M.Sc. in Economics and Business Administration from Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden, and MBA from the University of Antwerp, Belgium. |
| Bob Fassl held several Nico Delvaux started his Hans Ola Meyer was Jeanette Livijn started to Håkan Osvald joined Atlas management positions in career with Atlas Copco employed in 1978 to work work for Atlas Copco in the Copco in 1985 as Legal Atlas Copco Construction in 1991 and has had with Group accounting field of financial and busi Counsel. From 1989 he and Mining Technique positions in sales, and controlling. Later ness controlling in 1987 was General Counsel for business area in finance, marketing, service, he moved to Ecuador as and held various positions Atlas Copco North America service, logistics, purchas acquisition-integration Financial Manager. in this function. Since 1997 Inc. and Chicago ing and manufacturing, management and general Between 1984 and 1991, Jeanette Livijn has held Pneumatic Tool Company, starting 1982. From 1999 management, in markets he held various positions managerial positions with the United States. In 1991 he was General Manager including Benelux, Italy, at the broker Penning in human resource man he was appointed Vice for Atlas Copco Explora Canada and the United marknadsmäklarna, Swe agement. Before she took President Deputy General tion Products. Between States. Between 2008 den. Meyer returned to up this present position Counsel Atlas Copco 2004 to 2011 Fassl was and 2011 he was President Atlas Copco in 1991 as she was Vice President Group, with a special Division President for Drill of the Compressor Financial Manager in Spain Human Resources for the responsibility for ing Solutions. He has been Technique Service and in 1993 he became Industrial Technique busi acquisitions. Prior to his based in Canada, Sweden, division. Senior Vice President, ness area. current position, he was the United Kingdom, and Finance, for Atlas Copco General Counsel the United States. AB and a member of Operations. From 2012 he Group Management. is Secretary of the Board of Directors for Atlas Copco AB. |
Annika Berglund began her career in marketing analy sis and market research with Atlas Copco in 1979. Since then, she has held a number of positions in the Group related to market ing, sales, and business controlling in Europe. Prior to her current position, she was Marketing Manager for the electronic company Atlas Copco Controls (Danaher Motion), Sweden. |
| Member of The Swedish Chair of ICC Sweden, Financial Reporting Board reference group and member of the Board Competition. of Trustees for The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary. |
|
| 6 680 class A shares 5 151 class A shares 3 668 class A shares 7 286 class A shares 3 414 class A shares 1 330 class A shares 158 651 synthetic shares/ 81 077 synthetic shares/ 104 466 synthetic shares/ 18 021 class B shares 87 168 synthetic shares/ 2 600 class B shares employee stock options employee stock options employee stock options 149 616 synthetic shares/ employee stock options 61 364 synthetic shares/ employee stock options employee stock options |
10 467 class A shares 7 900 class B shares 96 145 synthetic shares/ employee stock options |
The Atlas Copco Group Management consists of the President and CEO, four business area presidents and four senior vice presidents in charge of Group functions.
Remuneration to Group Management
The Remuneration Policy is reviewed and presented to the AGM by the Board of Directors for approval every year. In 2012, the AGM decided to adopt the Board's proposal for remuneration.
The remuneration covers an annual base salary, variable compensation, possible long term incentive (personnel options), pension premium and other benefits. The variable compensation is limited to a maximum percentage of the base salary. No fees are paid for Board memberships in Group companies or for other duties performed outside the immediate scope of the individual's position. See note 5 and 23.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
This section includes a description of Atlas Copco's system of internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Swedish Code of Corporate Governance and as stipulated by the Swedish Companies Act.
The basis for the internal control is defined by the overall control environment. This environment is established by the Board of Directors and the Group Management and sets the tone for the organization, influencing the control consciousness of the people. One key success factor for a strong control environment lies in ensuring that the organizational structure, decision hierarchy, corporate values in terms of ethics and integrity as well as authorities to act are clearly defined and communicated through guiding documents such as internal policies, guidelines, manuals, and codes.
The company applies different processes to assess and identify the main risks relating to financial reporting misstatements. The risk assessment process is regularly performed to identify new risks and follow-up that internal control is improved over previously identified risks.
Identified risks are managed through the control activities in the company, which are documented in process and internal control descriptions on the Company, Division, Business area, and Group levels. These include instructions for attests and authority to pay and controls in business systems as well as accounting and business reporting processes.
The company has information and communication channels designed to ensure that information is identified, captured and communicated in a form and timeframe that enable people to carry out their responsibilities. Reporting instructions and accounting guidelines are communicated to personnel concerned in the internal database The Way We Do Things, supported by, for example, training programs for different categories of employees.
The company continuously monitors the adherence to internal policies, guidelines, manuals, and codes as well as efficiency in the control activities. Internal control is continuously evaluated in the operations, including regular management reviews and supervisory activities. Moreover, separate evaluations are performed through internal audits and control self assessments. The Audit Committee has an important role in supporting the Board of Directors to monitor whether the internal control processes facilitate adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Atlas Copco's internal control processes
Prokura The delegation of the authority to act both with respect to a third party and internally, or Prokura, as it is referred to within the Atlas Copco Group, aims at defining how responsibility is allocated to positions and, reflecting this, to individuals. Each position is covered by a Prokura and follows a predetermined authority to act, with stated rights and obligations. The goal is that each individual with any authority to act on behalf of a Group company should have such a defined written Prokura.
The entrustment of authority in the Group starts with the Board delegating the authority to be in charge of operations to the President and CEO. He then delegates to those reporting to him and so on down the line throughout the legal and operational structure of the Group.
Business control Each unit has a business controller responsible for ensuring that, among otherthings, there are adequate internal control processes over financial reporting, that the Group's control processes are implemented, and that any risk exposures are addressed and reported. The controller is also responsible for ensuring that The Way We Do Things is applied in all respects and that reports are correct, complete, and delivered on time. This involves analyzing trends and identifying outliers, such as declining sales in a growing market or increased energy consumption. Additionally, there are controllers at the Division, Business area, and Group levels with corresponding responsibilities for these aggregated levels.
Reporting Monthly operative reports are prepared to measure and analyze profitability per product category, Company, Business line, Division, and Business area. Each Division consolidates its units and reports adjustments and eliminations. Quarterly these reports are completed with additional information and specifications in accordance with a standardized reporting routine. These reports constitute the basis for the Group's quarterly and annual consolidated reports.
Quarterly and yearly reports are also prepared to measure and analyze social and environmental performance per Company, Division, and Business area. Consolidated reports constitute the basis for the Group's quarterly and annual sustainability reporting.
The Group uses a common system for consolidation of the reports which also provides certain system based validation reports. Information is stored in central databases from which it can be retrieved for analysis and follow-up. The analysis package includes a series of standardized scorecards used to analyze and follow up key indicators and trends in relation to the set targets. These scorecards cover key financial aspects, as well as other important operational performance measures.
Business boards An internal board structure, organized according to operational responsibilities (i.e. parallel to the legal company board structure), and Company Review Meetings between local management and responsible Division management are essential tools to follow up the adherence to internal policies, guidelines, instructions and codes as well as the efficiency in the control activities over financial reporting.
Internal audits In Atlas Copco, the Internal Audit process is intended to add value to each operational unit by providing an independent and objective assurance and consulting function to identify and recommend improvements. Further, the process aims to serve as a tool for employee professional development and to identify and recommend leading practices within the Group.
Internal audits are initiated by the Division in charge of operations or the responsible Holding company or by Group functions. An internal audit is performed each time there is a change of General Manager in a company or, for instance, after major negative events or structural changes, remarks from external auditors, when a new company is formed or acquired, if a long time has passed since the last audit, or as a planned risk-driven audit.
The target is that all operational units should be audited at least once every four years. Internal audits are normally performed by an inter-disciplinary team of people appointed from various parts of the organization with suitable competence for the audit to be conducted. There are standardized tools for planning and risk assessment before an audit, as well as audit programs and forms for reports and follow-up activities.
Atlas Copco has operations in several complex markets, where the risk of human rights abuses and corruption are high. Therefore, the adherence to the Business Code of Practice is evaluated in the internal audit process, including environmental aspects and business partner relationships.
The content of the audit varies depending on type of audit, but normally include assessments of areas that directly or indirectly has an impact on the quality and controls over financialreporting.
Focused areas On request from the Audit Committee, management has during the year identified some specific areas, in which the risks are assessed, activities to control these risks are identified and monitored. Examples of such focus areas are specific countries/regions, structural changes, certain accounting principles, business processes, fraud risks and information technology systems.
Control self assessment The objective of this process is primarily to support local unit managers in understanding and evaluating the status of their responsibilities. One of the areas is internal control which includes internal control over financial reporting. Other areas include legal issues, communication and branding, and Business Code of Practice. Unit managers annually review extensive questionnaires to personally assess to what extent their units comply with the defined requirements. The
answers are used by the respective unit managers to plan necessary improvement measures and, aggregated, for statistical assessments of the control routines and as a base for improvement of Group processes, clarification of instructions etc.
Hotline The Group has a process where employees can report on behavior or actions that are, or may be perceived as, violations of laws or of Group policies including violation of accounting and financial reporting guidelines and policies. This also includes perceived cases of human rights violation, discrimination or corruption. This process serves as a complement to similar processes that exist in certain countries. The reports are treated confidentially and the person who is reporting is guaranteed anonymity. Efforts have been made to increase the awareness of this process among all employees, e.g. through Business Code of Practice and fraud awareness training offered to managers and employees throughout the Group.
Compliance process Atlas Copco has implemented a process whereby Group Management, divisional managements and all managers responsible for an operational or holding entity and certain other positions have been requested to sign a statement confirming compliance to the Group's Business Code of Practice and applicable laws. The process is repeated on an annual basis.
Internal control statistics
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operative units in the Group | 438 | 407 | 388 |
| Internal audits conducted | 88 | 94 | 105 |
| Control self assessments completed | 299 | 284 | 280 |
Internal control routines – overview
| Procedure | Scope | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Proku ra |
Defining how responsibility is delegated to individuals | When a person is recruited to a new position |
| Business co ntrol |
Ensures adequate control routines, implementation of Group processes and reporting of risk exposure |
Continuously |
| Reporting | Financial reporting is prepared to measure profitability and constitute basis for Group consolidated (public) reports. |
Monthly, quarterly, annually |
| Reporting is also prepared to measure progress in fields related to environmental and social performance |
Quarterly, annually | |
| Business boards and Comp any Review Meetings |
Follow-up on adherence to The Way We Do Things and on efficiency in control activities | 3–4 times per year |
| Internal aud its |
To provide independent objective assurance and consultancy, recommend improvements, and contribute to employee professional development. To ensure compliance with the Group's corporate governance and internal control procedures |
All units at least once every four years |
| Focus ed areas |
To identify, assess and control major risks and monitor actions taken | Annually |
| Control self assessm ent |
To support the unit manager in taking appropriate actions and to assess control routines on the Group level |
Annually |
| Hotline | To highlight possible violations through anonymous reporting | As required |
| Compl iance statement |
To confirm compliance to Business Code of Practice and applicable laws | Annually |
Consolidated income statement
| For the year ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Note | 2012 | 2011 |
| Revenues | 4 | 90 533 | 81 203 |
| Cost of sales | 7 | –55 779 | –50 051 |
| Gross profit | 34 754 | 31 152 | |
| Marketing expenses | –8 659 | –7 625 | |
| Administrative expenses | –4 982 | –4 334 | |
| Research and development expenses | –2 042 | –1 805 | |
| Other operating income | 8 | 475 | 293 |
| Other operating expenses | 8 | –319 | –127 |
| Share of profit in associated companies | 14 | 1 | 6 |
| Operating profit | 4, 5, 6, 7, 16 | 19 228 | 17 560 |
| Financial income | 9 | 408 | 778 |
| Financial expenses | 9 | –1 098 | –1 062 |
| Net financial items | –690 | –284 | |
| Profit before tax | 18 538 | 17 276 | |
| Income tax expense | 10 | –4 624 | –4 288 |
| Profit for the year | 13 914 | 12 988 | |
| Profit attributable to: | |||
| – owners of the parent | 13 901 | 12 963 | |
| – non-controlling interests | 13 | 25 | |
| Basic earnings per share, SEK | 11 | 11.45 | 10.68 |
| Diluted earnings per share, SEK | 11 | 11.43 | 10.62 |
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
| For the year ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Note | 2012 | 2011 |
| Profit for the year | 13 914 | 12 988 | |
| Other comprehensive income | |||
| Translation differences on foreign operations | –1 917 | –350 | |
| – realized and reclassified to income statement | – | –2 | |
| Hedge of net investments in foreign operations | 645 | 93 | |
| Cash flow hedges | –22 | 68 | |
| Available-for-sale investments | – | 111 | |
| – realized and reclassified to income statement | – | –351 | |
| Income tax relating to components of other comprehensive income |
10 | –265 | –74 |
| Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax | 10 | –1 559 | –505 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 12 355 | 12 483 | |
| Total comprehensive income attributable to: | |||
| – owners of the parent | 12 346 | 12 476 | |
| – non-controlling interests | 9 | 7 |
Consolidated balance sheet
| As at December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Note | 2012 | 2011 |
| ASSETS | |||
| Non-current assets | |||
| Intangible assets | 12 | 15 879 | 15 352 |
| Rental equipment | 13 | 2 030 | 2 117 |
| Other property, plant and equipment | 13 | 6 846 | 6 538 |
| Investments in associated companies | 14 | 107 | 124 |
| Other financial assets | 15 | 2 581 | 2 713 |
| Other receivables | 38 | 94 | |
| Deferred tax assets | 10 | 1 110 | 1 052 |
| Total non-current assets | 28 591 | 27 990 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Inventories | 16 | 17 653 | 17 579 |
| Trade receivables | 17 | 15 960 | 16 783 |
| Income tax receivables | 632 | 533 | |
| Other receivables | 18 | 4 563 | 4 680 |
| Other financial assets | 15 | 1 333 | 1 773 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 19 | 12 416 | 5 716 |
| Assets classified as held for sale | 3 | 1 | 55 |
| Total current assets | 52 558 | 47 119 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 81 149 | 75 109 | |
| EQUITY | Page 68 | ||
| Share capital | 786 | 786 | |
| Other paid-in capital | 5 628 | 5 412 | |
| Reserves | –1 107 | 448 | |
| Retained earnings | 29 771 | 22 130 | |
| Total equity attributable to owners of the parent | 35 078 | 28 776 | |
| Non-controlling interests | 54 | 63 | |
| TOTAL EQUITY | 35 132 | 28 839 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 21 | 20 150 | 17 013 |
| Post-employment benefits | 23 | 1 401 | 1 504 |
| Other liabilities | 342 | 368 | |
| Provisions | 25 | 751 | 671 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 10 | 1 876 | 1 390 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 24 520 | 20 946 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 21 | 902 | 3 422 |
| Trade payables | 6 700 | 7 696 | |
| Income tax liabilities | 1 642 | 2 005 | |
| Other liabilities | 24 | 11 062 | 10 995 |
| Provisions | 25 | 1 191 | 1 206 |
| Total current liabilities | 21 497 | 25 324 | |
| TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | 81 149 | 75 109 |
Information concerning pledged assets and contingent liabilities is disclosed in note 26.
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
| 2012 | Equity attributable to owners of the parent | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Share capital |
Other paid-in capital |
Hedging reserve |
Fair value reserve |
Trans lation reserve |
Retained earnings |
Total | Non controlling interests |
Total equity |
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 786 | 5 412 | –25 | – | 473 | 22 130 | 28 776 | 63 | 28 839 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | –21 | –1 534 | 13 901 | 12 346 | 9 | 12 355 | |||
| Dividends | –6 069 | –6 069 | –1 | –6 070 | |||||
| Change in non-controlling interests | –90 | –90 | –17 | –107 | |||||
| Acquisition of series A shares | –477 | –477 | –477 | ||||||
| Divestment of series A shares held by Atlas Copco AB | 178 | 498 | 676 | 676 | |||||
| Divestment of series B shares held by Atlas Copco AB | 38 | 34 | 72 | 72 | |||||
| Share-based payment, equity settled | |||||||||
| – expense during the year | 50 | 50 | 50 | ||||||
| – exercise of options | –206 | –206 | –206 | ||||||
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 786 | 5 628 | –46 | – | –1 061 | 29 771 | 35 078 | 54 | 35 132 |
| 2011 Equity attributable to owners of the parent |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Share capital |
Other paid-in capital |
Hedging reserve |
Fair value reserve |
Trans lation reserve |
Retained earnings |
Total | Non controlling interests |
Total equity |
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 786 | 5 312 | –98 | 240 | 793 | 22 108 | 29 141 | 180 | 29 321 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 73 | –240 | –320 | 12 963 | 12 476 | 7 | 12 483 | ||
| Dividends* | –4 851 | –4 851 | –2 | –4 853 | |||||
| Redemption of shares | –393 | –5 674 | –6 067 | –6 067 | |||||
| Increase of share capital through bonus issue | 393 | –393 | – | – | |||||
| Change in non-controlling interests | –869 | –869 | –122 | –991 | |||||
| Acquisition of series A shares | –1 368 | –1 368 | –1 368 | ||||||
| Divestment of series A shares held by Atlas Copco AB | 73 | 236 | 309 | 309 | |||||
| Divestment of series B shares held by Atlas Copco AB | 27 | 27 | 54 | 54 | |||||
| Share-based payment, equity settled | |||||||||
| – expense during the year | 34 | 34 | 34 | ||||||
| – exercise of options | –83 | –83 | –83 | ||||||
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 786 | 5 412 | –25 | – | 473 | 22 130 | 28 776 | 63 | 28 839 |
* Net of dividend repaid of 1.
See notes 10 and 20 for additional information.
Consolidated statement of cash flows
| For the year ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Note | 2012 | 2011 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Operating profit | 19 228 | 17 560 | |
| Adjustments for: | |||
| Depreciation, amortization and impairment | 7 | 2 664 | 2 522 |
| Capital gain/loss and other non-cash items | –309 | –176 | |
| Operating cash surplus | 21 583 | 19 906 | |
| Net financial items received/paid | –592 | –1 275 | |
| Taxes paid | –5 053 | –3 307 | |
| Cash flow before change in working capital | 15 938 | 15 324 | |
| Change in: | |||
| Inventories | –639 | –4 267 | |
| Operating receivables | –71 | –3 834 | |
| Operating liabilities | –656 | 1 986 | |
| Change in working capital | –1 366 | –6 115 | |
| Increase in rental equipment | –1 299 | –1 332 | |
| Sale of rental equipment | 550 | 544 | |
| Net cash from operating activities | 13 823 | 8 421 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Investments in other property, plant and equipment | –1 672 | –1 728 | |
| Sale of other property, plant and equipment | 67 | 52 | |
| Investments in intangible assets | –920 | –619 | |
| Sale of intangible assets | 7 | 12 | |
| Sale of investments | 1 455 | 610 | |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries | 2 | –1 195 | –2 298 |
| Divestment of subsidiaries | 3 | – | 92 |
| Investment in other financial assets, net | –527 | –456 | |
| Net cash from investing activities | –2 785 | –4 335 | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Dividends paid | –6 069 | –4 851 | |
| Dividend paid to non-controlling interests | –1 | –2 | |
| Redemption of shares | – | –6 067 | |
| Acquisition of non-controlling interests | –107 | –991 | |
| Repurchase and divestment of own shares | 271 | –1 005 | |
| Borrowings | 6 857 | 497 | |
| Repayment of borrowings | –5 163 | –259 | |
| Payment of finance lease liabilities | –58 | –57 | |
| Net cash from financing activities | –4 270 | –12 735 | |
| Net cash flow for the year | 6 768 | –8 649 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents, Jan. 1 | 5 716 | 14 264 | |
| Net cash flow for the year | 6 768 | –8 649 | |
| Exchange-rate difference in cash and cash equivalents | –68 | 101 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents, Dec. 31 | 19 | 12 416 | 5 716 |
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
MSEK unless otherwise stated
| Note | Page | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Significant accounting principles, accounting estimate and judgments |
71 |
| 2 | Acquisitions | 79 |
| 3 | Assets held for sale and divestments | 81 |
| 4 | Segment information | 82 |
| 5 | Employees and personnel expenses | 84 |
| 6 | Remuneration to auditors | 87 |
| 7 | Operating expenses | 87 |
| 8 | Other operating income and expenses | 87 |
| 9 | Financial income and expenses | 88 |
| 10 | Taxes | 88 |
| 11 | Earnings per share | 90 |
| 12 | Intangible assets | 90 |
| 13 | Property, plant and equipment | 92 |
| 14 | Investments in associated companies | 93 |
| 15 | Other financial assets | 93 |
| 16 | Inventories | 93 |
| 17 | Trade receivables | 94 |
| 18 | Other receivables | 94 |
| 19 | Cash and cash equivalents | 94 |
| 20 | Equity | 95 |
| 21 | Borrowings | 96 |
| 22 | Leases | 97 |
| 23 | Employee benefits | 98 |
| 24 | Other liabilities | 102 |
| 25 | Provisions | 103 |
| 26 | Assets pledged and contingent liabilities | 103 |
| 27 | Financial exposure and principles for control of financial risks |
104 |
| 28 | Related parties | 108 |
| 29 | Subsequent events | 108 |
1. Significant accounting principles, accounting estimates and judgments
Significant accounting principles
The consolidated financial statements of Atlas Copco AB (also referred to as the "Company") comprise Atlas Copco AB and its subsidiaries (together referred to as "the Group" or Atlas Copco) and the Group's interest in associated companies.
Atlas Copco is an industrial group with world-leading positions in compressors, expanders and air treatment systems, construction and mining equipment, power tools, and assembly systems. The company is headquartered in Nacka, Sweden.
Basis of preparation
Statement of compliance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as endorsed by the EU. The statements are also prepared in accordance with the Swedish recommendation RFR 1 "Supplementary Accounting Rules for Groups" and applicable statements issued by the Swedish Financial Reporting Board. These detail certain additional disclosure requirements for Swedish consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The accounting principles as set out in the following paragraphs have, unless otherwise stated, been consistently applied to all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements and for all entities included in the consolidated financial statements. The Annual report for the Group and for Atlas Copco AB, including financial statements, was approved for issuance on February 28, 2013. Balance sheets and income statements are subject to the approval of the Annual General Meeting of the shareholders to be held on April 29, 2013.
Functional currency and presentation currency
These financial statements are presented in Swedish krona, which is the functional currency for Atlas Copco AB and also the presentation currency for the Group's financial reporting. Unless otherwise indicated, the amounts are presented in millions of Swedish kronor.
Basis of measurement
The consolidated financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis, except for certain financial assets and liabilities that are measured at their fair value: financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss, derivative financial instruments, and financial assets classified as available-for-sale.
Non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale are carried at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell as of the date of the initial classification as held for sale.
Use of estimates and judgments
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments as well as estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting principles and the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. Critical accounting estimates and judgments made by management that can have a significant effect on the financial statements are further discussed on pages 77–78.
Classification
Non-current assets and non-current liabilities are comprised primarily of amounts that are expected to be realized or paid more than 12 months after the balance sheet date. Current assets and current liabilities are comprised primarily of amounts expected to be settled within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Changes in accounting principles
The following revised and amended IFRS standard issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is applicable for the Group and has been applied from 2012.
• Amendments to IFRS 7 Financial instruments: Disclosures – Transfers of Financial Assets The amendments provide users with more information about an entity's exposure to the risks of transferred financial assets, particularly those that involve securitization of financial assets. The amendments also require additional disclosures if a disproportionate amount of transfer transactions are undertaken around the end of a reporting period. The amendments have had a limited impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Business combinations and consolidation
The consolidated income statement and balance sheet of the Group include all companies in which the Company, directly or indirectly, has control. Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity, so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights that presently are exercisable or convertible are taken into account.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the acquisition method. According to this method, business combinations are seen as if the Group directly acquires the assets and assumes the liabilities of the entity acquired. At the acquisition date, i.e. the date on which control is obtained, each identifiable asset acquired and liability assumed is recognized at its acquisition-date fair value.
Consideration transferred is measured at its fair value. It includes the sum of the acquisition date fair values of the assets transferred, liabilities incurred to the previous owners of the acquiree, and equity interests issued by the Group. Contingent consideration is initially measured at its acquisition-date fair value. Any subsequent change in such fair value is recognized in profit or loss, unless the contingent consideration is classified as equity. In that case, there is no remeasurement and the subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.
Transaction costs that the Group incurs in connection with a business combination, such as finder's fee, legal fees, due diligence fees, and other professional and consulting fees are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree, and the fair value of the Group's previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any) over the net of acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized but tested for impairment at least annually.
Non-controlling interest is initially measured either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest's proportionate share of the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. This means that goodwill is either recorded in "full" (on the total acquired net assets) or in "part" (only on the Group's share of net assets). The choice of measurement basis is made on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis.
Subsequent profit or loss and other components of comprehensive income attributable to the non-controlling interest are allocated to the non-controlling interest even if doing so causes the non-controlling interest to be in a deficit position.
Acquisitions of non-controlling interests are recognized as a transaction between equity attributable to owners of the parent and non-controlling interests. The difference between consideration paid and the proportionate share of net assets acquired is recognized in equity. Accordingly, goodwill does not arise in conjunction with such transactions. Gains and losses from sales of non-controlling interest that do not result in loss of control are also recognized in equity.
Earnings from the acquirees are reported in the consolidated income statement from the date of control.
Intra-group balances and transactions such as income, expenses, and dividends are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Profits and losses resulting from intra-group transactions that are recognized in assets, such as inventory and fixed assets, are eliminated in full, but losses only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
Associated companies
An associate is an entity in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over financial and operating policies. When the Group holds 20 to 50% of the voting power, it is presumed that significant influence exists unless it can be clearly demonstrated that this is not the case.
Holdings in associated companies are reported in the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with the equity method from when significant influence has been established and until significant influence ceases. Under the equity method, the carrying value of interests in an associate corresponds to the Group's share of reported equity of the associate, any goodwill, and any other remaining fair value adjustments recognized at acquisition date. The Group's profit or loss includes "Share of profit in associated companies", which comprises the Group's share of the associate's income after tax adjusted for any amortization and depreciation, impairment losses, and other adjustments arising from any remaining fair value adjustments recognized at acquisition date. Dividends received from an associated company reduce the carrying value of the investment.
Unrealized gains and losses arising from transactions with an associate are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest, but losses only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
When the Group's share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, the Group does not recognize further losses unless the Group has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.
Segment reporting
An operating segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenue and incur expenses, and for which discrete financial information is available. The operating results of all operating segments are reviewed regularly by the Group's President and CEO, the chief operating decision maker, to make decisions about allocation of resources to the segments and also to assess their performance. See note 4 for additional information.
Foreign currency
Foreign currency transactions
Functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which an entity operates. Transactions in foreign currencies (those which are denominated in other than the functional currency) are translated at the foreign exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Receivables and liabilities and other monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the foreign exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Exchange gains and losses related to trade receivables and payables, and other operating receivables and payables are included in "Other operating income and expenses". The exchange gains and losses relating to other financial assets and liabilities are included in "Financial income and expenses".
Exchange rate differences on translation to functional currency are reported in profit or loss, except when reported in other comprehensive income in the following cases:
- • translation of available-for-sale equity instruments,
- • translation of a financial liability designated as a hedge of the net investment in a foreign operation,
- • translation of intra-group receivables from, or liabilities to, a foreign operation that in substance is part of the net investment in the foreign operation, or
- • cash flow hedging of currency risks (when the hedge is qualified for hedge accounting) to the extent that the hedge is effective.
Exchange rates for major currencies used in the year-end accounts are shown in note 27.
Translation of accounts of foreign entities
The assets and liabilities of foreign entities, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on consolidation, are translated to Swedish kronor at the exchange rates ruling at the balance sheet date. Revenues, expenses, gains, and losses are translated at average exchange rates, which approximate the exchange rate for the respective transaction. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognized in other comprehensive income and are accumulated in a separate component of equity as a translation reserve. On divestment of foreign entities, the accumulated exchange differences, net after impact of currency hedges of net investments, are recycled through profit or loss, increasing or decreasing the profit or loss on divestments.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of sales taxes, goods returned, and discounts and other similar deductions. Revenue is recognized when recovery of the consideration is considered probable and the revenue and associated costs can be measured reliably.
Goods sold
Revenue from sale of goods is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer, which in most cases occurs in connection with delivery. When the product requires installation and this constitutes a significant part of the contract, revenue is recognized when the installation is completed. Revenue is not recorded for buy-back commitments if the substance of the agreement is that the risks and rewards of ownership have not been transferred to the buyer. No revenue is recognized if there are significant uncertainties regarding the possible return of goods.
Services rendered
Revenue from services is recognized in profit or loss by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction at the balance sheet date. The stage of completion is determined based on the proportion that costs incurred to date bear to the estimated total costs of the transaction. Where the outcome of a service contract cannot be estimated reliably, revenue is recognized to the extent of costs incurred that are expected to be recoverable. Contract costs are recognized as expenses in the period in which they are incurred. When it is probable that total contract costs will exceed total revenue, the expected loss is recognized as an expense immediately. When services are performed by an indeterminate number of acts over the service contract period, revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis.
Rental operations
The proceeds from sale of rental equipment are recognized as revenue when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer. The rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the rental period. The carrying value of the rental equipment sold is recognized as cost of sales. Investments in and sales of rental equipment are included in cash flows from operating activities.
Other operating income and expenses
Commissions and royalties are recognized on an accrual basis in accordance with the financial substance of the agreement.
Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount. Such gains and losses are recognized net within "Other operating income" or "Other operating expenses".
Government grants
A government grant is recognized when there is reasonable assurance that it will be received and that the Group will comply with the conditions attached to it. Government grants that compensate the Group for expenses incurred are recognized in profit or loss on a systematic basis in the same periods in which expenses are incurred and are presented net of the related expense.
Financial income and expenses
Interest income and interest expense are recognized in profit or loss using the effective interest method. Dividend income is recognized in profit or loss on the date that the Group's right to receive payment is established. See note 9 for additional information.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share are calculated based on the profit for the year attributable to owners of the parent and the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are calculated based on the profit for the year attributable to owners of the parent and the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Dilutive effects arise from stock options that are settled in shares or that at the employees' choice can be settled in shares or cash in the share based incentive programs. Stock options have a dilutive effect
when the average share price during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options.
When calculating the dilutive effect, the exercise price is adjusted by the value of future services related to the options. If options for which employees can choose settlement in shares or cash are dilutive, the profit for the year is adjusted for the difference between cash-settled and equity-settled treatment of options and the more dilutive of cash settlement and share settlement is used in calculating earnings per share.
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Goodwill arising on an acquisition represents the excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired in the business combination.
Goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination and is tested at least annually for impairment. In the case of reorganization or divestment of a cash generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated, goodwill is reallocated to the units affected based on their relative values.
Technology-based intangible assets
Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or technical knowledge, is expensed in profit or loss as incurred. Research projects acquired as part of business combinations are initially recognized at their fair value at the acquisition date (which is regarded as their cost). Subsequent to initial recognition, research projects acquired as part of business combinations are carried at cost less amortization and impairment losses.
Expenditure on development activities are expensed as incurred unless the activities are applied to a plan or a design for the production of new or substantially improved products or processes. In such instances, development activities are capitalized if the product or process is technically and commercially feasible and the Group has the intent and ability to complete, sell or use the intangible. The expenditure capitalized includes the cost of materials, direct labor, and other costs directly attributable to the development project. Capitalized development expenditure is carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses.
Computer software is capitalized and is carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses.
Trademarks
Trademarks acquired by the Group are capitalized based on their fair value at the time of acquisition (which is regarded as their cost). Certain trademarks are estimated to have an indefinite useful life and are carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. They are tested at least annually for impairment. Other trademarks, which have finite useful lives, are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses.
Marketing and customer related intangible assets
Acquired marketing and customer related intangibles, such as customer relations and other similar items, are capitalized based on their fair value at the time of acquisition (which is regarded as their cost) and carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses.
Other intangible assets
Acquired intangible assets relating to contract-based rights, such as licenses or franchise agreements, are capitalized based on their fair value at the time of acquisition (which is regarded as their cost) and carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses.
Expenditure on internally generated goodwill, trademarks, and similar items is expensed as incurred.
Property, plant and equipment
Items of property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Cost of an item of property, plant and equipment comprises purchase price, import duties, and any cost directly attributable to bringing the asset to location and condition for use. The Group capitalizes costs on initial recognition
and on replacement of significant parts of property, plant and equipment, if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied will flow to the Group and the cost can be measured reliably. All other costs are recognized as an expense in profit or loss when incurred.
Rental equipment
The rental fleet is comprised of diesel and electric powered air compressors, generators, air dryers, and to a lesser extent general construction equipment. Rental equipment is initially recognized at cost and is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the equipment. Rental equipment is depreciated to a residual value estimated at 0–10% of cost.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization is calculated based on cost using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. Parts of property, plant and equipment with a cost that is significant in relation to the total cost of the item are depreciated separately when the useful lives of the parts do not coincide with the useful lives of other parts of the item.
The following useful lives are used for depreciation and amortization:
| Years | |
|---|---|
| Technology-based intangible assets | 3–15 |
| Trademarks with definite lives | 5–15 |
| Marketing and customer related intangible assets | 5–10 |
| Buildings | 25–50 |
| Machinery and equipment | 3–10 |
| Vehicles | 4–5 |
| Computer hardware and software | 3–8 |
| Rental equipment | 3–12 |
The useful lives and residual values are reassessed annually. Land, goodwill, and trademarks with indefinite lives are not depreciated or amortized.
Leased assets
In the course of business, the Group acts both as lessor and lessee. In the consolidated financial statements, leases are classified as either finance leases or operating leases. A finance lease entails the transfer to the lessee of substantially all of the economic risks and benefits associated with ownership. If this is not the case, the lease is accounted for as an operating lease.
For the lessee, a financial lease implies that the fixed asset leased is recognized as an asset in the balance sheet. Initially, a corresponding liability is recorded. Upon initial recognition, the leased asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the future minimum lease payments. Fixed assets under finance leases are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, while the lease payments are reported as interest and amortization of the lease liability. For operating leases, the lessee does not account for the leased asset in its balance sheet. In profit or loss, the costs of operating leases are recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
In cases where the Group acts as the lessor under an operating lease, the asset is classified as rental equipment and is subject to the Group's depreciation policies. The lease payments are included in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Under finance leases where the Group acts as lessor, the transaction is recorded as a sale and a lease receivable, comprising the future minimum lease payments and any residual value guaranteed to the lessor, is recorded. Lease payments are recognized as interest income and repayment of the lease receivable.
Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets, i.e. assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale, are added to the cost of those assets until the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale. All other borrowing costs are expensed in accordance with the effective interest rate method.
Impairment of non-financial assets
The carrying amount of the Group's non-financial assets, such as intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, are reviewed at least at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any indication of impairment exists, the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. For goodwill and other assets that have an indefinite useful life, impairment tests are performed at a minimum on an annual basis. Annual impairment tests are also carried out for intangible assets not yet ready for use.
An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. If largely independent cash inflows cannot be linked to an individual asset, the recoverable amount is estimated for the smallest group of assets that includes the asset and generates cash inflows that are largely independent, i.e. a cash-generating unit. Goodwill is always allocated to a cash-generating unit or groups of cash-generating units and tested at the lowest level within the Group at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management purpose.
The recoverable amount is the greater of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset or cash-generating unit. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets, impairment losses in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indication that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. Impairment losses are assessed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses. The cost of inventories is based on the first-in, first-out principle and includes the costs of acquiring inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. Inventories manufactured by the Group and work in progress include an appropriate share of production overheads based on normal operating capacity. Inventories are reported net of deductions for obsolescence and internal profits arising in connection with deliveries from the production companies to the customer centers.
Provisions
A provision is recognized in the balance sheet when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and the outflow can be estimated reliably. The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date. If the effect of the time value of money is material, the provision is determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
A provision for warranties is charged as cost of sales at the time the products are sold based on the estimated cost using historical data for level of repairs and replacements.
A provision for restructuring is recognized when the Group has approved a detailed and formal restructuring plan and the restructuring has either commenced or been announced publicly. Future operating losses are not provided for.
A provision for onerous contracts is recognized when the expected benefits to be derived by the Group from a contract are lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations under the contract. The provision is measured at the present value of the lower of the expected cost of terminating the contract and the expected net cost of continuing with the contract. Before a provision is established, the Group recognizes any impairment loss on the assets associated with the contract.
Employee benefits
Defined contribution plans
A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a separate entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts. Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension plans are recognized as an employee benefit expense in profit or loss when employees provide services entitling them to the contributions.
Defined benefit plans
The Group has a number of defined benefit plans related to pensions and post-employment health care benefits in countries where operations are located. The net obligation in respect of defined benefit plans is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount of future benefits that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods. The amount of future benefits is discounted to determine its present value and the fair value of any plan assets is deducted.
The cost for defined benefit plans is calculated using the Projected Unit Credit Method, which distributes the cost over the employee's service period. The calculation is performed annually by independent actuaries. The obligations are valued at the present value of the expected future disbursements, taking into consideration assumptions such as expected future pay increases, rate of inflation, and increases in medical cost and mortality rates. The discount rate used is the equivalent of the interest rate for high-quality corporate or government bonds with a remaining term approximating that of the actual commitments.
Changes in actuarial assumptions and experience adjustments of obligations and the fair value of plan assets result in actuarial gains or losses. Such gains or losses, within 10% of the obligation or asset value that is within the 'corridor', are not immediately recognized. Gains or losses exceeding the 10% corridor are amortized over the remaining estimated service period of the employees.
Plan assets are measured at fair value. Funded plans with net assets, i.e. plans with assets exceeding the commitments, are reported as financial non-current assets, limited to the amount of accumulated actuarial losses and the present value of economic benefits available to the Group from the plan assets.
The interest portion of pension and other post-employment benefit costs and expected return on plan assets is not classified as an operating expense but is shown as interest expense. See notes 9 and 23 for additional information.
Other long-term employee benefits
The Group's net obligation in respect of long-term employee benefits other than pension plans is the amount of future benefits that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods. The benefit is discounted to determine its present value and the fair value of any related assets is deducted. The discount rate used is the same as for the defined benefit plans. The calculation is performed using the Projected Unit Credit Method. Any actuarial gains or losses are recognized in the period in which they arise.
Share-based payments
The Group has share-based incentive programs, consisting of share options and share appreciation rights, which have been offered to certain employees based on position and performance. Additionally, the Board is offered synthetic shares.
The fair value of share options that can only be settled in shares (equity-settled) is recognized as an employee expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value, measured at grant date using the Black-Scholes formula, is recognized as an expense over the vesting period. The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options that vest.
The fair value of the share appreciation rights, synthetic shares, and options with a choice for employees to settle in shares or cash is recognized in accordance with principles for cash-settled share-based payments, which is to recognize the value as an employee expense with a corresponding increase in liabilities. The fair value, measured at grant date and remeasured at each reporting date using the Black-
Scholes formula, is accrued and recognized as an expense over the vesting period. Changes in fair value are, during the vesting period and after the vesting period until settlement, recognized in profit or loss as an employee expense. The accumulated expense recognized equals the cash amount paid (or liability amount transferred to equity when employees have a choice and choose to settle in shares) at settlement.
Social security charges are paid in cash. Social security charges are accounted for consistent with the principles for cash-settled sharebased payments, regardless of whether they are related to equity- or cash-settled share-based payments.
Financial assets and liabilities
Recognition and derecognition
Financial assets and liabilities are recognized when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Purchases and sales of financial assets are accounted for at trade date, which is the day when the Group contractually commits to acquire or dispose of the assets. Trade receivables are recognized on issuance of invoices. Liabilities are recognized when the other party has performed and there is a contractual obligation to pay.
Derecognition (fully or partially) of a financial asset occurs when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial instruments expire or are transferred and substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership have been removed from the Group. The Group derecognizes (fully or partially) a financial liability when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged or otherwise expires.
A financial asset and a financial liability are offset and the net amount presented in the balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amounts and there is an intention to either settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Measurement and classification
Financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss are, at initial recognition, measured at fair value with addition or deduction of transaction costs. For financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs are expensed.
Financial assets and liabilities are upon initial recognition classified in accordance with the categories in IAS 39 based on the purpose of the acquisition of the instrument. This determines the subsequent accounting and measurement for financial assets and liabilities.
The Group classifies its financial assets in the following categories:
- • Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
- • Loans and receivables
- • Held-to-maturity investments
- • Assets available for sale
The Group classifies its financial liabilities in the following categories:
- • Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
- • Other financial liabilities measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method
Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss Financial assets and liabilities are classified as fair value through profit or loss if they are held for trading or are designated as such upon initial recognition.
A financial asset or liability is classified as held for trading if the Group manages such investments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their fair value. A derivative not part of hedge accounting is also categorized as held for trading. Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value and changes therein are recognized in profit or loss.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the Group provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor with no intention of trading the receivables. Loans and receivables are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
Trade receivables, other receivables, and cash and cash equivalents are included in this category. In most cases, short-term receivables are not carried at amortized cost due to short expected time to payment. Cash and cash equivalents include cash balances and shortterm highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash which are not subject to a significant risk of changes in value. An investment normally only qualifies as cash equivalent if it, upon acquisition, only has three months or less to maturity.
Held-to-maturity investments
Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity for which the Group has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity mean that a contractual arrangement defines the amounts and dates of payments to the holder, such as interest and principal payments. Held to maturity investments are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment losses.
Assets available for sale
Financial assets available for sale are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available for sale. Subsequent to initial recognition, these assets are measured at fair value. Changes therein are recognized in other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses on available-for-sale monetary items which are recognized in profit or loss.
For financial assets available for sale that are not monetary items, e.g. equity instruments, the gain or loss that is recognized in other comprehensive income includes any related foreign exchange component. When an investment is derecognized, the cumulative gain or loss in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or loss.
Other financial liabilities
Other financial liabilities are, subsequent to initial recognition, measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.
Borrowing costs are recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred unless they are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset.
Effective interest method
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial asset or a financial liability and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant periods. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument, or when appropriate a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability. The calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs, and all other premiums or discounts.
Impairment of financial assets
Financial assets, except for such assets classified as fair value through profit or loss, are assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any objective evidence that they are impaired. A financial asset is considered to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset. Individually significant financial assets are regularly tested for impairment on an individual basis or, in some cases, assessed collectively in groups with similar credit risks. An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortized cost is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate. For an available-for-sale financial asset, a decline in the fair value of the asset below its cost is evidence that the asset is impaired. In that case, the cumulative loss, measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on the asset previously recognized in profit or loss, is removed from other comprehensive income and recognized in profit and loss. Impairment losses
on financial assets of all other categories are recognized directly in profit or loss.
An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized. For financial assets measured at amortized cost and available-for-sale financial assets that are debt securities, the reversal is recognized in profit or loss. For available-for-sale financial assets that are equity securities, the reversal is recognized in other comprehensive income.
Derivatives and hedge accounting
Derivative instruments
Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently measured at their fair value. The method of recognizing the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument and, if so, the nature of the item hedged. The Group designates derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations.
Changes in fair value are reported as operating or financial income or expenses based on the purpose of the use of the derivatives and whether the instruments relate to operational or financial items.
For derivatives that are designated as hedging instruments, fair value changes are recognized in profit or loss unless the derivatives are designated as hedging instruments in cash flow or net investment hedges (see section below about hedge accounting). Changes in fair values of cross currency swaps and foreign exchange contracts are divided into three components and are accounted for as follows: interest is recognized as interest income/expense, foreign exchange effect as foreign exchange difference, and other changes in fair values as gains and losses from financial instruments.
Interest payments for interest swaps are recognized as interest income/expense, whereas changes in fair value of future payments are presented as gains and losses from financial instruments.
Hedge accounting
In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the hedging relationship must be formally designated, the hedge expected to be highly effective and the hedge relationship documented. The Group assesses, evaluates, and documents effectiveness both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis. The method of recognizing a gain or loss resulting from hedging instruments is dependent on the type of hedge relationship, i.e. which type of risk exposure that is reduced by the hedging instrument.
Fair value hedges
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in profit or loss together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk. These changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability are recognized in profit or loss to offset the effect of gain or loss on the hedging instrument.
If the hedging instrument no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, then hedge accounting is discontinued. The fair value adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item arising from the hedged risk is amortized to profit or loss from that date.
The Group applies fair value hedge accounting for interest rate swaps used for hedging fixed interest risk on borrowings.
Cash flow hedges
Changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument designated as a cash flow hedge are recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that the hedge is effective and the accumulated changes in fair value are recognized as a separate component in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
The cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in equity through other comprehensive income remains there until the forecast transaction affects profit or loss. The amount recognized in equity through other comprehensive income is recycled to profit or loss in the same period in which the hedged item affects profit or loss (for example when the forecast sale that is hedged takes place). However, when the hedged item is a nonfinancial asset (for example inventory or fixed asset), the amount recognized in equity through other comprehensive income is transferred to the carrying amount of the asset when it is initially recognized.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Group revokes the hedging relationship, when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or when it no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any cumulative gain or loss which at that time remains in equity is recognized when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognized in profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
Following decisions by the Financial Risk Management Committee, the Group uses foreign currency forwards to hedge part of the future cash flows from forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
The Group hedges a substantial part of net investments in foreign operations. Gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity. Gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in profit or loss. On divestment of foreign operations, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is recycled through profit or loss, increasing or decreasing the profit or loss on divestments. The Group uses loans and forward contracts as hedging instruments.
Equity
Shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effect.
When share capital recognized as equity is repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, which includes directly attributable costs net of any tax effects, is recognized as a deduction from equity. Repurchased shares are classified as treasury shares and are presented as a deduction from total equity. When treasury shares are sold or subsequently reissued, the amount received is recognized as an increase in equity and the resulting surplus or deficit on the transaction is transferred to or from other paid-in capital.
Income taxes
Income taxes include both current and deferred taxes in the consolidated accounts. Income taxes are reported in profit or loss unless the underlying transaction is reported in other comprehensive income or in equity. In those cases, the related income tax is also reported in other comprehensive income or in equity.
A current tax liability or asset is recognized for the estimated taxes payable or refundable for the current or prior years.
Deferred tax is recognized using the balance sheet liability method. The calculation of deferred taxes is based on either the differences between the values reported in the balance sheet and their respective values for taxation, which are referred to as temporary differences, or the carry forward of unused tax losses and tax credits. Temporary differences related to the following are not provided for: the initial recognition of goodwill, the initial recognition (other than in business combinations) of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit, and differences related to investments in subsidiaries and associated companies to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future.
A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized. In the calculation of deferred taxes, enacted or substantively enacted tax rates are used for the individual tax jurisdictions.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.
Assets held for sale
Assets are classified as held for sale if their value, within one year, will be recovered through a sale and not through continued use in the operations. On the reclassification date, assets and liabilities are measured at the lower of fair value less selling expenses and the carrying amount. Following reclassification, the assets are no longer depreciated/amortized. Gains and losses recognized on remeasurements and on disposals are reported in profit or loss.
Contingent liabilities
A contingent liability is a possible obligation or a present obligation that arises from past events that is not reported as a liability or provision, due either to that it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation or that a sufficiently reliable calculation of the amount cannot be made.
New and amended accounting standards after 2012
The following standards, interpretations, and amendments to standards have been issued but have not become effective as of December 31, 2012 and have not been applied by the Group. The assessment of the effect that the implementation of these standards and interpretations could have on the consolidated financial statements is preliminary.
• Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income
The amendments require a change in the way other comprehensive income is presented, requiring separate subtotals for elements which may be "recycled" (e.g. cash-flow hedging and foreign currency translation) and those elements that will not (e.g. remeasurement under IAS 19). The standard is applicable to annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012, with early adoption permitted.
• Amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits
The amendments to IAS 19 change the accounting for defined benefit plans and termination benefits. The most significant change relates to the accounting for changes in defined benefit obligations and plan assets. The amendments require the recognition of changes in defined benefit obligations and in fair value of plan assets when they occur, hence eliminating the "corridor method" permitted under the previous version of IAS 19 and accelerating the recognition of past service costs. The amendments require all actuarial gains and losses to be recognized immediately through other comprehensive income in order for the net pension asset or liability recognized in the consolidated financial statements to reflect the full value of the plan deficit or surplus. Additionally, the amendments replace interest cost and expected return on plan assets with net interest on the net defined benefit liability/asset.
The amended version of IAS 19 will be adopted by Atlas Copco as from January 1, 2013, with full retrospective application. The Group's net pension liability will increase by approximately 1 300 and have the following impact on the consolidated financial statement for the period 2012.
| – Other financial assets: | –500 |
|---|---|
| – Equity: | –950 |
| – Post-employment liabilities: +800 |
– Net deferred tax liabilities: –350
The removal of the amortization of the actuarial gains/losses and the modified net interest calculation would have increased the net income for the period by approximately 20. Other comprehensive income would have been negatively affected for the period by approximately 350.
• Amendments to IAS 32 Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The standard clarifies existing application issues relating to the requirements for offset of financial assets and financial liabilities. The effective date is January 1, 2014, and the impact is yet to be assessed by the Group.
- • Amendments to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities The amendments clarify the disclosure requirements about rights to offset financial assets and financial liabilities. Applicable for financial year starting on or after January 1, 2013.
- • IFRS 9 Financial Instruments*
The standard is intended to replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurements, and addresses the classification and measurement of financial instruments. It is likely to affect the Group´s accounting of financial assets and financial liabilities. The effective date is January 1, 2015, and the Group is yet to assess the full impact of IFRS 9.
• IFRS 13 Fair value measurement
The standard establishes a single framework for all fair value measurements when fair value is required or permitted by IFRS. The standard does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather describes how to measure fair value under IFRS when it is required or permitted by IFRS. IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Except for additional disclosures, the implementation of IFRS 13 is not expected to have any material effects for the Group.
• "The package of five"
Below are the standards in the "package of five". These are in the EU effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The implementation in 2014 is not expected to have any material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
- IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
- IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements
- IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
- IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements (Revised 2011)
- IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (Revised 2011)
- • Improvements to IFRSs 2009-2011 issued in May 2012* The improvements include a number of amendments to various IFRSs. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.
* Indicates that the standard has not yet been endorsed by the EU.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
The preparation of financial reports requires management's judgment and the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the prevailing circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
The estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to the accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which they are revised and in any future periods affected.
Following are the estimates and judgments which, in the opinion of management, are significant to the underlying amounts included in the financial reports and for which there is a significant risk that future events or new information could entail a change in those estimates or judgments.
Impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived assets
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
In accordance with IFRS, goodwill and certain trademarks are not amortized but are subject to annual tests for impairment. Other intangible assets and other long-lived assets are amortized or depreciated based on management's estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue but are also reviewed regularly for indications of
impairment. The impairment tests are based on a review of the recoverable amount, which is estimated based on management's projections of future cash flows using internal business plans and forecasts.
Accounting judgment
Asset impairment requires Management's judgment, particularly in assessing:
- whether an event has occurred that may affect asset values,
- whether the carrying value of an asset can be supported by the net present value of future cash flows, which are estimated based upon the continued use of the asset in the business, and
- the appropriate assumptions to be applied in preparing cash flow projections.
Changing the assumptions selected by management to determine the level, if any, of impairment could affect the financial position and results of operation.
At December 31, 2012, goodwill amounted to 10 180 (9 952), of which accumulated impairment losses were 26 (27). Trademarks not being amortized amounted to 1 225 (1 328). Additional information is included in note 12.
Pension and other post-employment benefit valuation assumptions
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Pensions and other post-employment obligations are dependent on the assumptions established by management and used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. The key assumptions include discount rates, inflation, expected return on plan assets, future salary increases, mortality rates, and health care cost trend rates. The actuarial assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis and are changed when it is deemed appropriate. Actuarial gain and loss resulting from the difference between the assumptions and actual results are amortized over the expected average remaining working life of the employees in accordance with the "corridor method".
At December 31, 2012, defined benefit obligations for pensions and other post-employment benefits amounted to 1 401 (1 504) and fair value of plan assets to 662 (608). See note 23 for additional information regarding assumptions used in the calculation of pension and post-employment obligations.
Trade and financial receivable
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
The Group estimates the risk that receivables will not be paid and provides for doubtful accounts based on specific provisions for known cases and collective provisions for losses based on historical loss levels.
Accounting judgment
Management's judgment considers rapidly changing market conditions which may be particularly sensitive in customer financing operations. Additional information is included in section "Credit risk" in note 27.
Total allowances for estimated losses as of December 31, 2012, were 827 (766) for trade receivables, finance lease receivables, and other financial receivables with a corresponding gross amount of 19 617 (20 956).
Inventory
Accounting judgment
The Group values inventory at the lower of historical cost, based on the first-in, first-out basis, and net realizable value. The calculation of net realizable value involves management's judgment as to over-stock articles, out-dated articles, damaged goods, and handling and other selling costs. If the estimated net realizable value is lower than cost, a valuation allowance is established for inventory obsolescence. See note 16 for additional information.
Legal proceedings Accounting judgment
In accordance with IFRS, Atlas Copco recognizes a liability when the Group has an obligation from a past event involving the transfer of economic benefits and when a reasonable estimate can be made of what the transfer might be. The Group reviews outstanding legal cases regularly in order to assess the need for provisions in the financial statements. These reviews consider the factors of the specific case by internal legal counsel and through the use of outside legal counsel and advisors when necessary. To the extent that management's assessment of the factors considered are not reflected in subsequent developments, the financial statements could be affected.
Deferred taxes
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Deferred tax assets are recognized for temporary differences between the carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes of assets and liabilities and the amounts used for taxation purposes and for tax loss carry-forwards. The Group records deferred tax assets based upon management's estimates of future taxable profit in different tax jurisdictions. The actual results may differ from these estimates, due to change in the business climate and change in tax legislation.
At December 31, 2012, the value of deferred tax assets amounted to 1 110 (1 052), see note 10 for additional information.
Revenue recognition
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Revenue from services is recognized in profit or loss by reference to the stage of completion of the transaction at the balance sheet date. The stage of completion is determined based on the proportion that costs incurred to date bear to the estimated total costs of the transaction.
Accounting judgment
Management's judgment is used, for instance, when assessing:
- if the risks and rewards have been transferred to the buyer, to determine if revenue and cost should be recognized in the current period,
- the degree of completion of service contracts and the estimated total costs for such contracts, to determine the revenue and cost to be recognized in the current period and whether any losses need to be recognized, and
- the customer credit risk (i.e. the risk that the customer will not meet the payment obligation), to determine and justify the revenue recognized in the current period.
Warranty provisions
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Provisions for product warranties should cover future commitments for the sales volumes already realized. Warranty provision is a complex accounting estimate due to the variety of variables which are included in the calculations. The calculation methods are based on the type of products sold and historical data for level of repairs and replacements. The underlying estimates for calculating the provision is reviewed at least quarterly as well as when new products are being introduced or when other changes occur which may affect the calculation. Total provisions for product warranties as of December 31, 2012, amounted to 925 (938).
2. Acquisitions
The following summarizes the significant acquisitions during 2012 and 2011:
| Closing date | Country | Business area | Revenues 1) | Number of employees 1) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Oct. 26 | NewTech Drilling Products | U.S.A. | Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 45 | 20 |
| 2012 Aug. 2 | Ekomak | Turkey and others | Compressor Technique | 200 | 160 |
| 2012 Aug. 1 | Gazcon A/S | Denmark | Compressor Technique | 30 | 21 |
| 2012 Mar. 16 | Guangzhou Linghein Compressor | China | Compressor Technique | 100 | 160 |
| 2012 Feb. 13 | Wuxi Shengda Air/Gas Purity Equipment Co., Ltd. |
China | Compressor Technique | 85 | 130 |
| 2012 Jan. 31 | Neumatica | Colombia | Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 2) | 15 |
| 2012 Jan. 31 | GIA Industri AB |
Sweden | Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 230 | 113 |
| 2012 Jan. 12 | Perfora S.p.A. | Italy | Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 90 | 43 |
| 2012 Jan. 4 | Houston Service Industries, Inc. | U.S.A. | Compressor Technique | 240 | 123 |
| 2011 Nov. 21 | Seti-Tec S.A.S. | France | Industrial Technique | 40 | 14 |
| 2011 Nov. 1 | Kalibrierdienst Stenger | Germany | Industrial Technique | 6 | 7 |
| 2011 Oct. 7 | SCA Schucker |
Germany and others |
Industrial Technique | 600 | 280 |
| 2011 Aug. 17 | Penlon Medical Gas Solutions | United Kingdom | Compressor Technique | 120 | 100 |
| 2011 Jul. 15 | Grupo Electrógenos GESAN S.A. |
Spain | Construction Technique | 510 | 160 |
| 2011 Jul. 1 | Sogimair S.A. and Aircom S.A. | Spain | Compressor Technique | 124 | 75 |
| 2011 May 31 | Tencarva | U.S.A. | Compressor Technique | 2) | 37 |
| 2011 Apr. 1 | ABAC Catalunya | Spain | Compressor Technique | 2) | 8 |
| 2011 Mar. 7 | J.C. Carter | U.S.A. | Compressor Technique | 175 | 70 |
1) Annual revenues and number of employees at time of acquisition.
2) Former distributor of Atlas Copco products. No revenues are disclosed for former Atlas Copco distributors.
The acquisitions above were made through the purchase of 100% of shares and voting rights or through the purchase of the net assets of the acquired operations. The Group received control over the operations upon the date of acquisition. No equity instruments have been issued in connection with the acquisitions. All acquisitions have been accounted for using the acquisition method of consolidation.
The amounts presented in the following tables detail the recognized amounts aggregated by business area, as the relative amounts of the individual acquisitions are not considered significant. The fair values related to intangible assets are amortized over 5–15 years. For those acquisitions that include a contingent consideration clause, the fair value of the contingent consideration has been calculated based on a discount rate of 4–10.5%. The Group is in the process of reviewing the final values for the acquired businesses. No adjustments are expected to be material.
Compressor Technique Recognized values 2012 2011 Intangible assets 292 140 Property, plant and equipment 74 17 Other assets 267 173 Cash and cash equivalents 24 15 Interest-bearing loans and borrowings –132 –5 Other liabilities and provisions –150 –88 Net identifiable assets 375 252 Goodwill 274 141 Total consideration 649 393 Deferred consideration 14 7 Cash and cash equivalents acquired –24 –15 Net cash outflow 639 385
The Compressor Technique business area made five acquisitions in 2012. In January, Houston Services Industries, Inc. was acquired. The company manufactures low-pressure blowers and vacuum pumps in the United States and has a strong domestic position in equipment for the wastewater treatment and industrial process sectors. The acquisition fits well with Atlas Copco's ambition to develop a globally leading position in the market for low pressure equipment, extending the product offering to blowers of nearly all sizes. It also offers sales synergies with Atlas Copco's existing products in these market segments. Intangible assets of 97 and goodwill of 77 were recorded on the purchase. The goodwill is not deductible for tax.
Wuxi Shengda Air/Gas Purity Equipment Co., Ltd. was acquired in February. The company manufactures compressed air and gas drying, and filtration equipment. It will continue to operate under the Shengda brand. The acquisition extends Atlas Copco's market presence and product offering in China. Intangible assets of 20 and goodwill of 36 were recorded on the purchase. The goodwill is not deductible for tax.
In March, certain assets of Chinese Guangzhou Linghein Compressor Co., Ltd. were acquired. The acquisition adds a brand of industrial compressors with a strong regional presence. Intangible assets of 69 and goodwill of 51 were recorded on the purchase. The goodwill is deductible for tax.
Danish Gazcon A/S, a manufacturer of nitrogen and oxygen generators, was acquired in August. The acquisition extends Atlas Copco's offering of nitrogen generators and adds oxygen generators to the range. Intangible assets of 9 and goodwill of 13 were recorded on the purchase. The goodwill is not deductible for tax.
The Ekomak group, a manufacturer of industrial screw compressors, was also acquired in August. The company has manufacturing in Turkey and its own sales and service operations in Russia and Germany. The acquisition strengthens Atlas Copco's market position in the region. Intangible assets of 101 and goodwill of 90 were recorded on the purchase. The goodwill is not deductible for tax.
Some adjustments related to the 2011 acquisitions of Sogimair S.A. and Aircom S.A., and Tencarva have been made, resulting in a total increase of 5 in the amount of goodwill recognized.
Total consideration for all acquisitions was 649.
Industrial Technique Recognized values 2012 2011 Intangible assets 1 670 Property, plant and equipment – 104 Other assets 1 401 Cash and cash equivalents – 79 Other liabilities and provisions –11 –198 Net identifiable assets –9 1 056 Goodwill –15 1 076 Total consideration –24 2 132 Deferred consideration 244 –373 Cash and cash equivalents acquired – –79 Net cash outflow 220 1 680
The Industrial Technique business area made no acquisitions in 2012. Some adjustments related to the 2011 acquisition of SCA Schucker have however been made, resulting in a decrease of 14 in the amount of goodwill recognized.
| Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognized values | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Intangible assets | 121 | 12 | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 9 | –8 | ||||||
| Other assets | 174 | – | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 9 | – | ||||||
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings | –117 | – | ||||||
| Other liabilities and provisions | –62 | – | ||||||
| Net identifiable assets | 134 | 4 | ||||||
| Goodwill | 229 | 1 | ||||||
| Total consideration | 363 | 5 | ||||||
| Deferred consideration | –21 | 11 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents acquired | –9 | – | ||||||
| Net cash outflow | 333 | 16 |
The Mining and Rock Excavation Technique business area made four acquisitions in 2012.
In January, Italian Perfora S.p.A., was acquired. The company manufactures and sells drilling and cutting equipment for the dimension stone industry, i.e. quarries that produce raw stone blocks. The acquisition is expected to bring good growth opportunities. As part of Atlas Copco, Perfora becomes a unique global supplier of tailormade equipment for dimension stone producers. Intangible assets of 32 and goodwill of 71 were recorded on the purchase. The goodwill is not deductible for tax.
The underground business of Swedish GIA Industri AB was also acquired in January. With this acquisition, Atlas Copco broadens its offering with products such as electric mine trucks, utility vehicles, and ventilation systems. Intangible assets of 31 and goodwill of 97 were recorded on the purchase. The goodwill is not deductible for tax.
Also in January, Atlas Copco took over the sales of drilling equipment and related services from its distributor Neumatica Del Caribe S.A. in Colombia. The acquisition provides an opportunity to further strengthen Atlas Copco's local service activities and develop relations with customers in other mining segments. Intangible assets of 20 were recorded on the purchase.
U.S. based NewTech Drilling Products was acquired in October. The company develops and manufactures drilling products with a focus on rotary PDC (polycrystalline diamond compact) drilling bits as well as klaw bits for rotary soft rock mining. The acquisition broadens Atlas Copco's range of products and extends the Group's expertise for existing customers in the mining, construction, and oil and gas industries. Intangible assets of 32 and goodwill of 61 were recorded on the purchase. The goodwill is deductible for tax.
Total consideration for all acquisitions was 363. This includes contingent consideration with a fair value of 13 related to the acquisition of NewTech Drilling Products. For the maximum amount to be paid, certain revenue targets must be met the first three years after the acquisition. The fair value of the contingent consideration has been calculated based on the assumption that the maximum amount will be paid.
| Construction Technique | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognized values | |||||
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||
| Intangible assets | – | 80 | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | – | 31 | |||
| Other assets | 1 | 294 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | – | 114 | |||
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings | – | –24 | |||
| Other liabilities and provisions | –5 | –203 | |||
| Net identifiable assets | –4 | 292 | |||
| Goodwill | 7 | 57 | |||
| Total consideration | 3 | 349 | |||
| Deferred consideration | – | –18 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents acquired | – | –114 | |||
| Net cash outflow | 3 | 217 |
The Construction Technique business area made no acquisition in 2012. Some adjustments related to the 2011 acquisition of Grupo Electrógenos GESAN S.A. have however been made, resulting in an increase of 7 in the amount of goodwill recognized.
Total fair value of acquired assets and liabilities
| Group recognized values |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | ||
| Intangible assets | 414 | 902 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 83 | 144 | |
| Deferred tax assets, net | – | 1 | |
| Other non-current assets | – | 5 | |
| Inventories | 209 | 368 | |
| Receivables* | 233 | 480 | |
| Other current assets | 1 | 14 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 33 | 208 | |
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings | –249 | –29 | |
| Other liabilities and provisions | –184 | –489 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities, net | –44 | – | |
| Net identifiable assets | 496 | 1 604 | |
| Goodwill | 495 | 1 275 | |
| Total consideration | 991 | 2 879 | |
| Deferred consideration | 237 | –373 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents acquired | –33 | –208 | |
| Net cash outflow | 1 195 | 2 298 |
* The gross amount is 243 (506) of which 10 (26) is expected to be uncollectible.
The goodwill recognized on acquisitions is primarily related to the synergies expected to be achieved from integrating these companies into the Group's existing structure.
The total consideration for all acquisitions was 991. Total consideration includes deferred consideration not yet paid for acquisitions made in 2012 and settlement of deferred consideration for acquisitions made in prior years. For all acquisitions, the outflow totaled 1 195 after deducting cash and cash equivalents acquired of 33.
Acquisition-related costs amounted to 11 (27) and were included in "Administrative expenses" in the income statement for 2012.
Contribution from businesses acquired in 2012 and 2011 by business area
| Technique | Compressor | Industrial Technique |
Mining and Rock Excavation Tech nique |
Construction Technique |
Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |
| Contribution from date of control | ||||||||||
| Revenues | 497 | 268 | – | 266 | 306 | – | – | 270 | 803 | 804 |
| Operating profit | –30 | –20 | – | 59 | –20 | – | – | 8 | –50 | 47 |
| Profit for the year | –42 | 2 | ||||||||
| Contribution if the acquisition had occurred on Jan. 1 |
||||||||||
| Revenues | 724 | 441 | – | 970 | 309 | – | – | 589 | 1 033 | 2 000 |
| Operating profit | –13 | –20 | – | 228 | –19 | – | – | 19 | –32 | 227 |
| Profit for the year | –28 | 153 |
In December 2012, Atlas Copco agreed to acquire the Swiss-based MEYCO Equipment business. MEYCO has about 40 employees and in 2011, the company had revenues of around MEUR 20 (MSEK 175). The acquisition broadens Atlas Copco's offering with mobile equipment for applying sprayed concrete (shotcreting) in underground operations. It will be part of the Mining and Rock Excevation Technique Business Area.
On February 28, 2013, Atlas Copco acquired Air et Techniques Energies Provence, a distributor of industrial compressors and related products based in Aix-en-Provence, France. The company has about 30 employees and annual revenues of approximately MEUR 6 (MSEK 50). The acquisition will be part of the Compressor Technique Business Area and further strengthens Atlas Copco's presence in France.
3. Assets held for sale and divestments
| Divestment during 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closing date | Operations | Country | Business area | Revenues1) | Number of employees1) |
| 2011 Oct. 7 | Self drilling anchors | Austria | Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 100 | 45 |
1) Annual revenues and number of employees at time of divestment.
Divestments
There were no divestments in 2012.
tions on the date of divestment.
In October 2011, Atlas Copco MAI GmbH divested its business related to self drilling anchors, i.e. rock bolts that are primarily used in civil engineering. The divestment in the Mining and Rock Excavation Technique business area is part of Atlas Copco's strategy within rock reinforcement to focus on products for the mining industry. The gain on the divestment, amounting to 8, was reported under "Other operating income", see note 8. The following table presents the carrying value of the divested opera-
Assets held for sale
A portfolio of financing and leasing contracts related to Atlas Copco Customer Finance, amounting to 1 268, was reclassified to assets held for sale in 2012. In July, these assets were sold to an independent bank.
Following the restructuring of certain production facilities, those facilities were reclassified to assets held for sale during 2011. Assets held for sale from prior years, amounting to 54, were sold during 2012.
The above sales resulted in capital gains of 137 which were included in "Other operating income", see note 8.
| Carrying value of divested assets and liabilities | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
| Goodwill | – | 61 | |||||
| Other intangible assets | – | 1 | |||||
| Other property, plant and equipment | – | 9 | |||||
| Inventories | – | 17 | |||||
| Other liabilities and provisions | – | –2 | |||||
| Net carrying value | – | 86 | |||||
| Capital gain | – | 8 | |||||
| Translation differences recycled | – | –2 | |||||
| Consideration and cash received | – | 92 |
4. Segment information
| Mining | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compressor | Industrial | and Rock Excavation |
Construction | Common group |
|||
| 2012 | Technique | Technique | Technique | Technique | functions | Eliminations | Group |
| Revenues from external customers | 34 638 | 9 536 | 33 998 | 12 119 | 242 | – | 90 533 |
| Inter-segment revenues | 76 | 30 | 56 | 769 | 77 | –1 008 | – |
| Total revenues | 34 714 | 9 566 | 34 054 | 12 888 | 319 | –1 008 | 90 533 |
| Operating profit | 8 017 | 2 155 | 8 315 | 1 326 | –627 | 42 | 19 228 |
| – of which share of profit in associated companies | – | –1 | 2 | – | – | – | 1 |
| Net financial items | –690 | ||||||
| Income tax expense | –4 624 | ||||||
| Profit for the year | 13 914 | ||||||
| Non-cash expenses | |||||||
| Depreciation/amortization | 1 030 | 250 | 798 | 280 | 361 | –129 | 2 590 |
| Impairment | 16 | – | 53 | 5 | – | – | 74 |
| Other non-cash expenses | 75 | 23 | –7 | 21 | 26 | – | 138 |
| Segment assets | 21 081 | 6 686 | 19 702 | 14 075 | 3 636 | –1 960 | 63 220 |
| – of which goodwill | 2 678 | 1 481 | 1 079 | 4 942 | – | – | 10 180 |
| Investments in associated companies | 1 | 98 | 8 | – | – | – | 107 |
| Unallocated assets | 17 822 | ||||||
| Total assets | 81 149 | ||||||
| Segment liabilities | 8 103 | 1 841 | 5 561 | 1 928 | 3 902 | –1 584 | 19 751 |
| Unallocated liabilities | 26 266 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 46 017 | ||||||
| Capital expenditures | |||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 1 003 | 171 | 1 337 | 289 | 499 | –269 | 3 030 |
| – of which assets leased | 16 | 1 | 39 | 3 | – | – | 59 |
| Intangible assets | 189 | 102 | 332 | 138 | 159 | – | 920 |
| Total capital expenditures | 1 192 | 273 | 1 669 | 427 | 658 | –269 | 3 950 |
| Goodwill acquired | 274 | –15 | 229 | 7 | – | – | 495 |
| 2011 | Compressor Technique |
Industrial Technique |
Mining and Rock Excavation Technique |
Construction Technique |
Common group functions |
Eliminations | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues from external customers | 31 674 | 7 791 | 29 264 | 12 226 | 248 | – | 81 203 |
| Inter-segment revenues | 86 | 30 | 92 | 692 | 66 | –966 | – |
| Total revenues | 31 760 | 7 821 | 29 356 | 12 918 | 314 | –966 | 81 203 |
| Operating profit | 7 592 | 1 767 | 7 196 | 1 460 | –374 | –81 | 17 560 |
| – of which share of profit in associated companies | – | 4 | 2 | – | – | – | 6 |
| Net financial items | –284 | ||||||
| Income tax expense | –4 288 | ||||||
| Profit for the year | 12 988 | ||||||
| Non-cash expenses | |||||||
| Depreciation/amortization | 957 | 201 | 792 | 281 | 339 | –121 | 2 449 |
| Impairment | 2 | – | 1 | 70 | – | – | 73 |
| Other non-cash expenses | –210 | –13 | –56 | 51 | –18 | – | –246 |
| Segment assets | 21 281 | 6 742 | 18 964 | 14 894 | 4 127 | –2 536 | 63 472 |
| – of which goodwill | 2 524 | 1 553 | 921 | 4 954 | – | – | 9 952 |
| Investments in associated companies | 1 | 116 | 7 | – | – | – | 124 |
| Unallocated assets | 11 513 | ||||||
| Total assets | 75 109 | ||||||
| Segment liabilities | 8 929 | 1 866 | 6 329 | 2 283 | 3 351 | –2 131 | 20 627 |
| Unallocated liabilities | 25 643 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 46 270 | ||||||
| Capital expenditures | |||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 1 006 | 159 | 1 328 | 154 | 706 | –237 | 3 116 |
| – of which assets leased | 14 | 4 | 34 | 4 | – | – | 56 |
| Intangible assets | 171 | 117 | 238 | 80 | 13 | – | 619 |
| Total capital expenditures | 1 177 | 276 | 1 566 | 234 | 719 | –237 | 3 735 |
| Goodwill acquired | 141 | 1 076 | 1 | 57 | – | – | 1 275 |
The Group is organized in separate and focused but still integrated business areas, each operating through divisions. The business areas offer different products and services to different customer groups. They are also the basis for management and internal reporting and are regularly reviewed by the Group's President and CEO, the chief operating decision maker. All business areas are managed on a worldwide basis and their role is to develop, implement and follow up the objectives and strategies within their respective business. For a description of the business areas, see pages 20–35.
Common group functions, i.e. functions which serve all business areas or the Group as a whole, is not considered a segment.
The accounting principles of the segments are the same as those described in note 1. Atlas Copco's inter-segment pricing is determined on a commercial basis.
Segment assets are comprised of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, other non-current receivables, inventories, and current receivables.
Segment liabilities include the sum of non-interest bearing liabilities such as operating liabilities, other provisions, and other non-current liabilities. Capital expenditure includes property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets, but excludes the effect of goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment through acquisitions.
Revenues from external customers are
| comprised of the following categories: | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Sale of equipment | 53 897 | 48 374 |
| Service (incl. spare parts, consumables, accessories, and rental) |
36 636 | 32 829 |
| 90 533 | 81 203 |
Geographical information
The revenues presented are based on the location of the customers while non-current assets are based on the geographical location of the assets. These assets include non-current assets other than financial instruments, investments in associated companies, deferred tax assets, and post-employment benefit assets.
| By geographic area/country | Revenues | Non-current assets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |
| North America | ||||
| Canada | 4 029 | 3 348 | 258 | 200 |
| U.S.A. | 11 231 | 9 501 | 4 042 | 3 927 |
| Other countries in North America | 2 931 | 2 316 | 83 | 81 |
| 18 191 | 15 165 | 4 383 | 4 208 | |
| South America | ||||
| Brazil | 3 839 | 3 992 | 304 | 345 |
| Chile | 2 411 | 2 111 | 112 | 86 |
| Other countries in South America | 3 128 | 2 510 | 46 | 53 |
| 9 378 | 8 613 | 462 | 484 | |
| Europe | ||||
| Belgium | 823 | 827 | 1 425 | 1 307 |
| France | 2 409 | 2 345 | 234 | 235 |
| Germany | 3 888 | 3 504 | 2 743 | 2 962 |
| Italy | 1 633 | 1 805 | 995 | 951 |
| Russia | 4 196 | 3 427 | 158 | 131 |
| Sweden | 2 041 | 1 856 | 9 157 | 8 607 |
| Other countries in Europe | 11 970 | 11 463 | 1 642 | 1 583 |
| 26 960 | 25 227 | 16 354 | 15 776 | |
| Africa/Middle East | ||||
| South Africa | 3 443 | 3 143 | 158 | 169 |
| Other countries in Africa/Middle East | 7 207 | 5 489 | 230 | 186 |
| 10 650 | 8 632 | 388 | 355 | |
| Asia/Australia | ||||
| Australia | 5 708 | 5 423 | 236 | 439 |
| China | 10 199 | 9 526 | 1 686 | 1 424 |
| India | 3 182 | 3 022 | 558 | 522 |
| Other countries in Asia/Australia | 6 265 | 5 595 | 688 | 799 |
| 25 354 | 23 566 | 3 168 | 3 184 | |
| 90 533 | 81 203 | 24 755 | 24 007 |
Quarterly data
| Revenues by business area | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSEK | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Compressor Technique | 8 306 | 8 692 | 8 599 | 9 117 | 6 989 | 7 676 | 8 264 | 8 831 |
| – of which external | 8 287 | 8 672 | 8 584 | 9 095 | 7 000 | 7 699 | 8 171 | 8 804 |
| – of which internal | 19 | 20 | 15 | 22 | –11 | –23 | 93 | 27 |
| Industrial Technique | 2 471 | 2 420 | 2 280 | 2 395 | 1 768 | 1 800 | 1 816 | 2 437 |
| – of which external | 2 464 | 2 414 | 2 271 | 2 387 | 1 763 | 1 792 | 1 807 | 2 429 |
| – of which internal | 7 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 8 |
| Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 8 434 | 8 846 | 8 278 | 8 496 | 6 516 | 6 994 | 7 642 | 8 204 |
| – of which external | 8 418 | 8 807 | 8 265 | 8 508 | 6 485 | 6 987 | 7 609 | 8 183 |
| – of which internal | 16 | 39 | 13 | –12 | 31 | 7 | 33 | 21 |
| Construction Technique | 3 206 | 3 697 | 3 074 | 2 911 | 3 063 | 3 599 | 3 292 | 2 964 |
| – of which external | 3 006 | 3 477 | 2 910 | 2 726 | 2 930 | 3 422 | 3 090 | 2 784 |
| – of which internal | 200 | 220 | 164 | 185 | 133 | 177 | 202 | 180 |
| Common Group functions/eliminations | –163 | –218 | –137 | –171 | –113 | –118 | –275 | –146 |
| 22 254 | 23 437 | 22 094 | 22 748 | 18 223 | 19 951 | 20 739 | 22 290 |
| Operating profit by business area | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSEK | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Compressor Technique | 1 833 | 1 910 | 2 065 | 2 209 | 1 701 | 1 840 | 1 990 | 2 061 |
| in % of revenues | 22.1 | 22.0 | 24.0 | 24.2 | 24.3 | 24.0 | 24.1 | 23.3 |
| Industrial Technique | 592 | 552 | 479 | 532 | 401 | 392 | 398 | 576 |
| in % of revenues | 24.0 | 22.8 | 21.0 | 22.2 | 22.7 | 21.8 | 21.9 | 23.6 |
| Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | 2 072 | 2 191 | 2 031 | 2 021 | 1 537 | 1 641 | 1 959 | 2 059 |
| in % of revenues | 24.6 | 24.8 | 24.5 | 23.8 | 23.6 | 23.5 | 25.6 | 25.1 |
| Construction Technique | 342 | 488 | 355 | 141 | 449 | 499 | 390 | 122 |
| in % of revenues | 10.7 | 13.2 | 11.5 | 4.8 | 14.7 | 13.9 | 11.8 | 4.1 |
| Common Group functions/eliminations | –235 | –122 | –12 | –216 | –101 | –195 | 63 | –222 |
| Operating profit | 4 604 | 5 019 | 4 918 | 4 687 | 3 987 | 4 177 | 4 800 | 4 596 |
| in % of revenues | 20.7 | 21.4 | 22.3 | 20.6 | 21.9 | 20.9 | 23.1 | 20.6 |
| Net financial items | –115 | –180 | –184 | –211 | 69 | –96 | –97 | –160 |
| Profit before tax | 4 489 | 4 839 | 4 734 | 4 476 | 4 056 | 4 081 | 4 703 | 4 436 |
| in % of revenues | 20.2 | 20.6 | 21.4 | 19.7 | 22.3 | 20.5 | 22.7 | 19.9 |
5. Employees and personnel expenses
| Average number | 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| of employees | Women | Men | Total | Women | Men | Total | |
| Parent Company | |||||||
| Sweden | 61 | 48 | 109 | 58 | 48 | 106 | |
| Subsidiaries | |||||||
| North America | 974 | 4 603 | 5 577 | 816 | 4 017 | 4 833 | |
| South America | 468 | 2 653 | 3 121 | 424 | 2 472 | 2 896 | |
| Europe | 2 810 | 14 123 | 16 933 | 2 594 | 13 079 | 15 673 | |
| – of which Sweden | 783 | 3 810 | 4 593 | 702 | 3 545 | 4 247 | |
| Africa/Middle East | 393 | 2 211 | 2 604 | 361 | 1 964 | 2 325 | |
| Asia/Australia | 1 901 | 8 868 | 10 769 | 1 662 | 7 636 | 9 298 | |
| Total in subsidiaries | 6 546 32 458 39 004 | 5 857 29 168 35 025 | |||||
| 6 607 32 506 | 39 113 | 5 915 29 216 35 131 |
| Women in Atlas Copco Board and Management, % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec. 31, 2012 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
|||||
| Parent Company | ||||||
| Board of Directors excl. union representatives | 33 | 33 | ||||
| Group Management | 22 | 221) | ||||
| 1) Average 24%. |
| Remuneration and other benefits | Group | Parent Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||
| Salaries and other remuneration | 14 419 | 12 610 | 161 | 123 | |
| Contractual pension benefits | 898 | 781 | 15 | 15 | |
| Other social costs | 2 808 | 2 519 | 69 | 49 | |
| 18 125 | 15 910 | 245 | 187 | ||
| Pension obligations to Board members and Group Management 1) | 15 | 16 | 15 | 16 |
1) Refers to former members of Group Management.
| Remuneration and other benefits to the Board | Total fees | Adj. due to | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KSEK | Fee | Value of synthetic shares at grant date |
Number of synthetic shares at grant date |
Other fees1) |
incl. value of synthetic shares at grant date 2012 |
change in stock price and vesting period2) |
Total expense recognized 20123) |
Total expense recognized 20113) |
| Chair of the Board: | ||||||||
| Sune Carlsson | 1 569 | – | – | 185 | 1 754 | 1 354 | 3 108 | 1 542 |
| Vice Chair: | ||||||||
| Jacob Wallenberg (until Apr 2012) | 81 | – | – | – | 81 | 496 | 577 | 560 |
| Other members of the Board: | ||||||||
| Staffan Bohman | 334 | 270 | 1 768 | 125 | 729 | 258 | 987 | 554 |
| Peter Wallenberg Jr (from Apr 2012) | 203 | 270 | 1 768 | 45 | 518 | –34 | 484 | – |
| Margareth Øvrum | 268 | 270 | 1 768 | – | 538 | 374 | 912 | 407 |
| Johan Forssell | 268 | 270 | 1 768 | 125 | 663 | 374 | 1 037 | 532 |
| Ulla Litzén | 536 | – | – | 260 | 796 | 293 | 1 089 | 689 |
| Anders Ullberg | 536 | – | – | 120 | 656 | 293 | 949 | 549 |
| Gunilla Nordström | 471 | – | – | – | 471 | 190 | 661 | 485 |
| Other members of the Board previous year: | –99 | |||||||
| Union representatives (4 positions) | 48 | – | – | – | 48 | – | 48 | 44 |
| Total | 4 314 | 1 080 | 7 072 | 860 | 6 254 | 3 598 | 9 852 | 5 263 |
| Total 2011 | 3 308 | 1 986 | 11 884 | 875 | 6 169 | –906 | 5 263 |
1) Refers to fees for membership in board committees.
2) Refers to synthetic shares received in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
3) Provision for synthetic shares as at December 31, 2012, amounted to 18 (14).
| Remuneration and other benefits to Group Management | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KSEK | Base salary |
Variable compensation 1) |
Other benefits 2) |
Pension fees |
Total, excl. recognized costs for share based payments |
Recognized costs for share based payments 3) |
Total expense recognized 2012 |
Total expense recognized 2011 |
| President and CEO | ||||||||
| Ronnie Leten | 9 500 | 5 750 4) | 1 424 | 3 325 | 19 999 | 5 755 | 25 754 | 19 197 |
| Other members of Group Management (8 positions) |
23 099 | 10 839 | 3 807 | 6 878 | 44 623 | 9 538 | 54 161 | 37 856 |
| Total | 32 599 | 16 589 | 5 231 | 10 203 | 64 622 | 15 293 | 79 915 | 57 053 |
| Total 2011 (9 positions) 5) | 29 028 | 14 021 | 3 270 | 9 686 | 56 005 | 1 048 | 57 053 | |
| Total remuneration and other benefits to the Board and Group Management |
89 767 | 62 316 |
1) Refers to variable compensation earned in 2012 to be paid in 2013.
2) Refers to vacation pay, company car, medical insurance, and house allowance.
3) Refers to stock options and SARs received in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 and includes recognized costs due to change in stock price and vesting period, see also note 23. 4) The CEO has not exercised the option to have his compensation for 2012 as an additional pension contribution.
5) Four business areas from July 1, 2011.
Remuneration and other fees for members of the Board, the President and CEO, and other members of Group Management
Principles for remuneration to the Board and Group Management The principles for remuneration to the Board and Group Management are approved at the Annual General Meeting of the shareholders. The proposals approved by the 2012 meeting are described in the following paragraphs.
Board members
Remuneration and fees are based on the work performed by the Board. The remuneration and fees approved for 2012 are detailed in the table on the previous page. The remuneration to the President and CEO, who is a member of Group Management, is described in the following sections.
The Annual General Meeting decided that each board member can elect to receive 50% of the 2012 gross fee before tax, excluding other committee fees, in the form of synthetic shares and the remaining part in cash. The number of synthetic shares is based upon an average end price of series A shares during ten trading days following the release of the first quarterly interim report for 2012. The share rights are earned 25% per quarter as long as the member remains on the Board. After five years, the synthetic shares give the right to receive a cash payment per synthetic share based upon an average price for series A shares during 10 trading days following the release of the first quarterly interim report of the year of payment. The board members will receive dividends on series A shares until payment date in the form of new synthetic shares. If a board member resigns his or her position before the stipulated payment date as stated above, the board member has the right to request a prepayment. The prepayment will be made twelve months after the date from when the board member resigned or otherwise the original payment date is valid.
Four board members accepted the right to receive synthetic shares. The number and costs at grant date and at the end of the financial year are disclosed by board member in the table on the previous page.
Group Management
Group Management consists of the President and the other eight members of the Management Committee. The compensation to Group Management shall consist of base salary, variable compensation, possible long term incentive (personnel options), pension premium, and other benefits. The following describes the various guidelines in determining the amount of remuneration:
- Base salary is determined by position, qualification, and individual performance.
- Variable compensation is dependent upon how certain quantitative and qualitative goals set in advance are achieved. The variable compensation is maximized to 70 % of the base salary for the Group President, 50% for Business Area Presidents, and 40% for other members of the Management Committee.
- Performance related personnel option program for 2012 as approved by the Board, see note 23.
- Pension premiums are paid in accordance with a defined contribution plan with premiums ranging between 25–35% of base salary depending on age.
- Other benefits consist of company car and private health insurance. • For the expatriates, certain benefits are paid in compliance with the Atlas Copco expatriate employment policy.
A mutual notice of termination of employment of six months shall apply. Compensation for termination is maximized to an amount corresponding to 24 months base salary.
The Board has the right to deviate from the principles stated above if special circumstances exist in a certain case. No fees are paid to Group Management for board memberships in Group companies nor do they receive compensation for other duties that they may perform outside the immediate scope of their duties.
President and CEO
The variable compensation can give a maximum of 70% of the base salary. The variable compensation is not included in the basis for pension benefits. According to an agreement, the President and CEO has the option to receive variable compensation in the form of cash payment or as a pension contribution.
The President and CEO is a member of the Atlas Copco Airpower n.v. pension plan and the contributions follow the Atlas Copco pension policy for Swedish executives, which is a defined contribution plan. The President and CEO is entitled to retire at the age of 60. The contribution is age related and is 35% of the base salary and includes provisions for a survivors' pension. These pension plans are vested and are lifetime payments upon retirement.
Other members of Group Management
Members of Group Management employed in Sweden have a defined contribution pension plan, with contribution ranging from 25% to 35% of the base salary according to age. The variable compensation is not included in the basis for pension benefits. Members of Group Management not based in Sweden also have a defined contribution pension plan. These pension plans are vested and are lifetime payments upon retirement. The retirement age is 65.
Option/share appreciation rights, holdings for Group Management The stock options/share appreciation rights holdings as at December 31 are detailed below:
Stock Options/share appreciations rights holdings as at Dec. 31, 2012
| Grant Year | CEO | Other members of Group Management |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | – | 20 255 |
| 2008 | 60 511 2) | 56 510 |
| 2009 | 54 459 | 74 882 |
| 2010 | 126 857 | 265 780 |
| 2011 | 93 175 | 241 690 |
| 2012 1) | 109 383 | 238 286 |
| 444 385 | 897 403 |
1) Estimated grants for the 2012 stock option program including matching shares. 2) Includes options/share appreciation rights from previous positions. See note 23 for additional information.
Termination of employment
The CEO is entitled to a severance pay of twelve months if the Company terminates the employment and a further twelve months if other employment is not available.
Other members of Group Management are entitled to severance pay if the Company terminates their employment. The amount of severance pay is dependent on the length of employment with the Company and the age of the executive, but is never less than twelve months and never more than 24 months salary.
Any income that the executive receives from employment or other business activity, whilst severance pay is being paid, will reduce the amount of severance pay accordingly.
Severance pay for the CEO and other members of Group Management is calculated only on the base salary and does not include variable compensation. Severance pay cannot be elected by the employee, but will only be paid if employment is terminated by the Company.
Remuneration and other committees
In 2012, the Chair of the Board, Sune Carlsson and Board Members Peter Wallenberg Jr and Anders Ullberg were members of the remuneration committee. The committee proposed compensation to the President and CEO for approval by the Board. The committee also supported the President and CEO in determining the compensation for the other members of Group Management.
In addition, three members of the Board participated in a committee regarding repurchase and sale of own shares.
6. Remuneration to auditors
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Deloitte | ||
| Audit fee | 51 | 48 |
| Audit activities other than the audit assignment | 1 | – |
| Other services, tax | 5 | 4 |
| Other services, other | 12 | 5 |
| Other audit firms | ||
| Audit fee | 2 | 3 |
| 71 | 60 |
At the Annual General Meeting 2010, Deloitte was elected as auditor for the Group for a four year period. Audit fees and consultancy fees for advice or assistance other than audit are detailed above.
7. Operating expenses
| Amortization, depreciation and impairment | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Product development | 320 | 429 |
| Trademark | 114 | 63 |
| Marketing and customer related assets | 190 | 151 |
| Other technology and contract based assets | 236 | 172 |
| Buildings | 184 | 149 |
| Machinery and equipment | 939 | 842 |
| Rental equipment | 681 | 716 |
| 2 664 | 2 522 |
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets are recognized in the following line items in the income statement:
| 2012 | 2011 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internally generated |
Acquired | Internally generated |
Acquired | |
| Cost of sales | 16 | 23 | 17 | 18 |
| Marketing expenses | 23 | 293 | 16 | 215 |
| Administrative expenses |
54 | 47 | 37 | 35 |
| Research and development |
||||
| expenses | 312 | 92 | 411 | 66 |
| 405 | 455 | 481 | 334 |
Impairment charges on intangible assets totaled 54 (67) of which 19 (64) were classified as development expenses in the income statement, 34 (–) as marketing expenses, and 1 (–) as cost of sales. Of the impairment charges, 18 (64) were due to capitalized development costs relating to projects discontinued.
8. Other operating income and expenses
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Other operating income | ||
| Commissions received | 24 | 18 |
| Income from insurance operations | 175 | 198 |
| Capital gain on assets held for sale | 137 | – |
| Capital gain on sale of fixed assets | 19 | 15 |
| Capital gain on divestment of business | – | 8 |
| Exchange-rate differences, net | – | 4 |
| Other operating income | 120 | 50 |
| 475 | 293 | |
| 2012 | 2011 | |
| Other operating expenses | ||
| Capital loss on sale of fixed assets | –19 | –26 |
| Exchange-rate differences, net | –183 | – |
The operating profit includes –36 (15) of realized foreign exchange hedging result, which were previously recognized in equity.
–319 –127
Other operating expenses –117 –101
9. Financial income and expenses
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Interest income | ||
| – cash and cash equivalents | 129 | 207 |
| – finance lease receivables | 217 | 215 |
| – other | 8 | 6 |
| Capital gain | ||
| – available-for-sale financial assets | – | 348 |
| – other assets | 3 | – |
| Change in fair value – other assets | – | 2 |
| Foreign exchange gain, net | 51 | – |
| Financial income | 408 | 778 |
| Interest expense | ||
| – borrowings | –753 | –697 |
| – derivatives for fair value hedges | –175 | –127 |
| – pension provisions, net | –70 | –110 |
| Change in fair value – other liabilities and | ||
| borrowings | –83 | –80 |
| Foreign exchange loss, net | – | –32 |
| Impairment loss | –17 | –16 |
| Financial expenses | –1 098 | –1 062 |
| Financial expenses, net | –690 | –284 |
Interest rates have been lower compared to 2011, resulting in lower interest income on cash and cash equivalents.
In 2011, Atlas Copco sold all remaining assets available for sale in RSC Holding Inc., which resulted in a capital gain of 350.
"Foreign exchange gain, net" includes foreign exchange gains of 387 (459) on financial assets at fair value through profit and loss and foreign exchange losses of 336 (491) on other liabilities.
See note 27 for additional information.
10. Taxes
| Income tax expense | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Current taxes | –4 377 | –3 902 |
| Deferred taxes | –247 | –386 |
| –4 624 | –4 288 |
The following is a reconciliation of the companies' weighted average tax based on the national tax for the country as compared to the actual tax charge:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 18 538 | 17 276 |
| Weighted average tax based on national rates | –5 485 | –5 095 |
| – in % | 29.6 | 29.5 |
| Tax effect of: | ||
| Non-deductible expenses | –417 | –286 |
| Withholding tax on dividends | –117 | –514 |
| Tax-exempt income | 1 145 | 1 356 |
| Adjustments from prior years: | ||
| – current taxes | 7 | 216 |
| – deferred taxes | 63 | 32 |
| Effects of tax losses/credits utilized | 23 | 54 |
| Change in tax rate, deferred tax | 185 | 29 |
| Tax losses not valued | –24 | –82 |
| Other items | –4 | 2 |
| Income tax expense | –4 624 | –4 288 |
| Effective tax in % | 24.9 | 24.8 |
The effective tax rate was 24.9% (24.8). Withholding tax on dividends relates to provisions on increased profits in countries where Atlas Copco incurs withholding taxes on repatriation of income. The net from tax issues and disputes in different countries was a positive amount of 7 (216).
Previously unrecognized tax losses/credits and deductible temporary differences, which have been recognized against current tax expense, amounted to 23 (54). No material unrecognized tax losses/credits or temporary difference have been used to reduce deferred tax expense. The decrease in tax rate in Sweden, effective from January 1, 2013, has had a positive impact included in "Change in tax rate, deferred tax" in the table above.
The following table reconciles the net liability balance of deferred taxes at the beginning of the year to the net liability at the end of the year:
| Change in deferred taxes | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Net balance, Jan. 1 | –338 | 142 |
| Business acquisitions | –44 | 1 |
| Charges to profit for the year | –247 | –386 |
| Tax on amounts recorded to equity | –66 | –85 |
| Translation differences | –71 | –10 |
| Net balance, Dec. 31 | –766 | –338 |
The deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized in the balance sheet are attributable to the following:
| Deferred tax assets and liabilities | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Liabilities | Net balance | Assets | Liabilities | Net balance | |||
| Intangible assets | 14 | 790 | –776 | 17 | 771 | –754 | ||
| Property, plant and equipment | 267 | 559 | –292 | 294 | 570 | –276 | ||
| Other financial assets | 3 | 207 | –204 | 1 | 198 | –197 | ||
| Inventories | 1 492 | 6 | 1 486 | 1 571 | 31 | 1 540 | ||
| Current receivables | 212 | 195 | 17 | 214 | 192 | 22 | ||
| Operating liabilities | 534 | 83 | 451 | 545 | 4 | 541 | ||
| Provisions | 287 | 1 | 286 | 268 | 1 | 267 | ||
| Post-employment benefits | 165 | 7 | 158 | 165 | 6 | 159 | ||
| Borrowings | 12 | 838 | –826 | 11 | 848 | –837 | ||
| Loss/credit carry forwards | 221 | – | 221 | 162 | – | 162 | ||
| Other items 1) | 3 | 1 290 | –1 287 | 9 | 974 | –965 | ||
| Deferred tax assets/liabilities | 3 210 | 3 976 | –766 | 3 257 | 3 595 | –338 | ||
| Netting of assets/liabilities | –2 100 | –2 100 | – | –2 205 | –2 205 | – | ||
| Net deferred tax balances | 1 110 | 1 876 | –766 | 1 052 | 1 390 | –338 |
1) Other items primarily include tax deductions which are not related to specific balance sheet items.
At December 31, the Group had total tax loss carry-forwards of 2 297 (2 377), of which deferred tax assets were not recognized for 1 518 (1 728) as it is not considered probable that future taxable profit will be available from which the Group can utilize the benefits. There is no expiration date for utilization of the major part of the tax losses for which no deferred tax assets have been recorded.
Changes in temporary differences during the year that are recognized in the income statement are attributable to the following:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 15 | –4 |
| Property, plant and equipment | –21 | –84 |
| Other financial assets | –11 | 21 |
| Inventories | –22 | 390 |
| Current receivables | –6 | –118 |
| Operating liabilities | –54 | 137 |
| Provisions | 34 | –20 |
| Post-employment benefits | 4 | –7 |
| Borrowings | 65 | 96 |
| Other items | –318 | –512 |
| Changes due to temporary differences | –314 | –101 |
| Loss/credit carry-forwards | 67 | –285 |
| –247 | –386 |
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other comprehensive income for the year | Before tax | Tax | After Tax | Before tax | Tax | After Tax |
| Attributable to owners of the parent | ||||||
| Translation differences on foreign operations | –1 913 | –124 | –2 037 | –332 | –54 | –386 |
| – realized and reclassified to income statement | – | – | – | –2 | – | –2 |
| Hedge of net investments in foreign operations | 645 | –142 | 503 | 93 | –25 | 68 |
| Cash flow hedges | –22 | 1 | –21 | 68 | 5 | 73 |
| Available-for-sale investments | – | – | – | 111 | – | 111 |
| – realized and reclassified to income statement | – | – | – | –351 | – | –351 |
| –1 290 | –265 | –1 555 | –413 | –74 | –487 | |
| Attributable to non-controlling interests | ||||||
| Translation differences on foreign operations | –4 | – | –4 | –18 | – | –18 |
| –1 294 | –265 | –1 559 | –431 | –74 | –505 |
11. Earnings per share
| Basic earnings per share | Diluted earnings per share | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in SEK | 2012 2011 |
2012 | 2011 | ||
| Earnings per share | 11.45 | 10.68 | 11.43 | 10.62 |
The calculation of earnings per share presented above is based on profits and number of shares as detailed below.
| Profit for the year attributable to owners of the parent | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year | 13 901 | 12 963 |
| Average number of shares outstanding | 2012 | 20111) |
| Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding | 1 213 848 110 | 1 214 287 007 |
| Effect of employee stock options | 1 746 377 | 2 964 903 |
| Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding | 1 215 594 487 | 1 217 251 910 |
1) The redemption procedure approved by the 2011 Annual General Meeting, whereby every share was split into one ordinary share and one redemption share which was then automatically redeemed, did not have any impact on the weighted average number of shares.
Potentially dilutive instruments
As of December 31, 2012, Atlas Copco had six outstanding employee stock option programs, of which the exercise price for the 2010, 2011 and 2012 programs exceeded the average share price for series A shares, SEK 159 per share. These programs are, therefore, considered anti-dilutive and are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. If the average share price exceeds the strike price in the future, these options will be dilutive.
12. Intangible assets
Impairment tests for cash-generating units with goodwill and for intangible assets with indefinite useful lives
Impairment tests (including sensitivity analyses) are performed as per September 30 each year.
In 2011, the Group changed from three to four business areas and divisions were split into equipment and aftermarket divisions. Since then, current goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes at business area level. The goodwill has therefore been tested for impairment at business area level.
All businesses acquired in 2012 as well as those in previous years, and their related cash flows, have been integrated with other Atlas Copco operations soon after the acquisition. In instances where the acquired business would not be integrated and hence be monitored separately, the associated goodwill will be tested for impairment separately.
The recoverable amounts of the cash generating units have been calcu-
lated as value in use based on management's five-year forecast for net cash flows where the most significant assumptions are revenues, operating profits, working capital, and capital expenditures.
All assumptions for the five-year forecast are estimated individually for each of the business areas based on their particular market position and the characteristics and development of their end markets. The forecasts represent management's assessment and are based on both external and internal sources. The perpetual percentage for the period after five years is estimated at 3%. The Group's average weighted cost of capital in 2012 was 8% (8) after tax (approximately 10.5% (10.5) before tax) and has been used in discounting the cash flows to determine the recoverable amounts.
The following table presents the carrying value of goodwill and trademarks with indefinite useful lives allocated by business area.
| Carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives by cash generating unit | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
| Trademarks | Goodwill | Trademarks | Goodwill | ||||||
| Compressor Technique | – | 2 678 | – | 2 524 | |||||
| Industrial Technique | – | 1 481 | 103 | 1 553 | |||||
| Mining and Rock Excavation Technique | – | 1 079 | – | 921 | |||||
| Construction Technique | 1 225 | 4 942 | 1 225 | 4 954 | |||||
| Total | 1 225 | 10 180 | 1 328 | 9 952 |
The trademark Dynapac in the Road Construction Equipment division represents a strong trademark that has been used for a long time in its industry. Management's intention is that this trademark will be used indefinitely. The estimated useful life of the trademark Rodcraft in the Chicago Pneumatic Tools division has been reevaluated during 2012 and is no longer considered to be indefinite.
| Internally generated intangible assets |
Acquired intangible assets | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Product development |
Other technology and contract based |
Product development |
Trademark | Marketing and customer related |
Other technology and contract based |
Goodwill | Total |
| Cost | ||||||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 3 404 | 538 | 61 | 2 261 | 1 804 | 1 472 | 9 979 | 19 519 |
| Investments | 636 | 221 | – | – | – | 63 | – | 920 |
| Business acquisitions | – | – | 3 | 83 | 222 | 107 | 495 | 910 |
| Disposals | –72 | –68 | –1 | –4 | –1 | –29 | – | –175 |
| Reclassifications | –8 | 15 | – | – | – | –7 | – | – |
| Translation differences | –80 | –14 | 1 | –47 | –84 | –67 | –268 | –559 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 3 880 | 692 | 64 | 2 293 | 1 941 | 1 539 | 10 206 | 20 615 |
| Amortization and impairment losses |
||||||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 2 091 | 342 | 57 | 280 | 761 | 609 | 27 | 4 167 |
| Amortization for the period | 300 | 89 | 2 | 88 | 183 | 144 | – | 806 |
| Impairment charge for the period |
16 | – | 2 | 26 | 7 | 3 | – | 54 |
| Business acquisitions | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Disposals | –65 | –68 | – | –4 | –1 | –29 | – | –167 |
| Reclassifications | 6 | –4 | –5 | – | – | 12 | – | 9 |
| Translation differences | –48 | –7 | 1 | –15 | –34 | –30 | –1 | –134 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 2 300 | 352 | 57 | 375 | 916 | 710 | 26 | 4 736 |
| Carrying amounts | ||||||||
| At Jan. 1 | 1 313 | 196 | 4 | 1 981 | 1 043 | 863 | 9 952 | 15 352 |
| At Dec. 31 | 1 580 | 340 | 7 | 1 918 | 1 025 | 829 | 10 180 | 15 879 |
| Internally generated intangible assets |
Acquired intangible assets | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Product development |
Other technology and contract based |
Product development |
Trademark | Marketing and customer related |
Other technology and contract based |
Goodwill | Total |
| Cost | ||||||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 2 913 | 509 | 66 | 2 086 | 1 554 | 916 | 8 796 | 16 840 |
| Investments | 492 | 34 | – | – | – | 93 | – | 619 |
| Business acquisitions | – | – | – | 175 | 249 | 478 | 1 275 | 2 177 |
| Divestment of business | – | – | – | – | – | –2 | –61 | –63 |
| Disposals | –24 | –10 | – | –1 | –9 | –11 | – | –55 |
| Reclassifications | 32 | 6 | –6 | – | – | 6 | – | 38 |
| Translation differences | –9 | –1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | –8 | –31 | –37 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 3 404 | 538 | 61 | 2 261 | 1 804 | 1 472 | 9 979 | 19 519 |
| Amortization and impairment losses |
||||||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 1 688 | 277 | 50 | 216 | 610 | 508 | 27 | 3 376 |
| Amortization for the period | 352 | 62 | 13 | 63 | 151 | 107 | – | 748 |
| Impairment charge for the period |
64 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 67 |
| Divestment of business | – | – | – | – | – | –1 | – | –1 |
| Disposals | –15 | –8 | – | – | –9 | –6 | – | –38 |
| Reclassifications | 10 | 6 | –6 | –1 | – | 2 | – | 11 |
| Translation differences | –8 | 2 | – | 2 | 9 | –1 | – | 4 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 2 091 | 342 | 57 | 280 | 761 | 609 | 27 | 4 167 |
| Carrying amounts | ||||||||
| At Jan. 1 | 1 225 | 232 | 16 | 1 870 | 944 | 408 | 8 769 | 13 464 |
| At Dec. 31 | 1 313 | 196 | 4 | 1 981 | 1 043 | 863 | 9 952 | 15 352 |
Other technology and contract based intangible assets include computer software, patents, and contract based rights such as licenses and franchise agreements. All intangible assets other than goodwill and trademarks with indefinite useful lives are amortized. For information regarding amortization and impairment, see notes 1 and 7. See note 2 for information on business acquisitions.
13. Property, plant and equipment
| 2012 | Buildings and land |
Machinery and equipment |
Construction in progress and advances |
Total | Rental equipment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | |||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 4 203 | 10 191 | 648 | 15 042 | 4 455 |
| Investments | 119 | 829 | 781 | 1 729 | 1 301 |
| Business acquisitions | 49 | 61 | – | 110 | – |
| Disposals | –23 | –386 | – | –409 | –753 |
| Reclassifications 1) | 140 | 355 | –554 | –59 | –572 |
| Translation differences | –197 | –356 | –18 | –571 | –174 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 4 291 | 10 694 | 857 | 15 842 | 4 257 |
| Depreciation and impairment losses | |||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 1 672 | 6 832 | – | 8 504 | 2 338 |
| Depreciation for the period | 181 | 922 | – | 1 103 | 681 |
| Impairment charge for the period | 3 | 17 | – | 20 | – |
| Business acquisitions | 5 | 22 | – | 27 | – |
| Disposals | –14 | –331 | – | –345 | –421 |
| Reclassifications 1) | –5 | –5 | – | –10 | –275 |
| Translation differences | –72 | -231 | – | –303 | –96 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 1 770 | 7 226 | – | 8 996 | 2 227 |
| Carrying amounts | |||||
| At Jan. 1 | 2 531 | 3 359 | 648 | 6 538 | 2 117 |
| At Dec. 31 | 2 521 | 3 468 | 857 | 6 846 | 2 030 |
1) A portfolio of financing and leasing contracts related to Atlas Copco Customer Finance was reclassified to assets held for sale in 2012, see note 3. The net book value of the rental equipment reclassified amounted to 258.
| Construction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Buildings and land |
Machinery and equipment |
in progress and advances |
Total | Rental equipment |
| Cost | |||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 3 839 | 9 600 | 244 | 13 683 | 3 993 |
| Investments | 318 | 986 | 477 | 1 781 | 1 335 |
| Business acquisitions | 83 | 61 | – | 144 | – |
| Divestment of business | – | –43 | – | –43 | – |
| Disposals | –29 | –382 | – | –411 | –857 |
| Reclassifications 1) | –14 | 9 | –80 | –85 | – |
| Translation differences | 6 | –40 | 7 | –27 | –16 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 4 203 | 10 191 | 648 | 15 042 | 4 455 |
| Depreciation and impairment losses | |||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 1 566 | 6 415 | – | 7 981 | 2 150 |
| Depreciation for the period | 149 | 836 | – | 985 | 716 |
| Impairment charge for the period | – | 6 | – | 6 | – |
| Divestment of business | – | –34 | – | –34 | – |
| Disposals | –22 | –329 | – | –351 | –511 |
| Reclassifications 1) | –23 | –32 | – | –55 | – |
| Translation differences | 2 | –30 | – | –28 | –17 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 1 672 | 6 832 | – | 8 504 | 2 338 |
| Carrying amounts | |||||
| At Jan. 1 | 2 273 | 3 185 | 244 | 5 702 | 1 843 |
| At Dec. 31 | 2 531 | 3 359 | 648 | 6 538 | 2 117 |
1) In accordance with IFRS 5, fixed assets related to operations in France were reclassified as assets held for sale during the fourth quarter, see note 3 for additional information.
For information regarding depreciation, see notes 1 and 7. See note 22 for information on finance leases.
14. Investments in associated companies
| Accumulated capital participation | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 124 | 108 |
| Acquisitions of associated companies | – | 1 |
| Dividends | –4 | – |
| Profit for the year after income tax | 1 | 6 |
| Translation differences | –14 | 9 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 107 | 124 |
Summary of financial information for associated companies
| Country | Assets | Liabilities | Equity | Revenues | Profit for the year |
Group's share, % 1) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | |||||||
| Qingdao Qianshao Pneumatic Tool Manufacturing Tech Ltd. | China | 49 | 5 | 44 | 35 | –2 | 25 |
| Shenzen Nectar Engineering & Equipment Co. Ltd. | China | 81 | 42 | 39 | 137 | 6 | 25 |
| Toku-Hanbai Group | Japan | 280 | 106 | 174 | 677 | – | 50 |
| Reintube S.L. | Spain | 6 | 4 | 2 | 13 | – | 47 |
| 2011 | |||||||
| Qingdao Qianshao Pneumatic Tool Manufacturing Tech Ltd. | China | 54 | 6 | 48 | 40 | – | 25 |
| Shenzen Nectar Engineering & Equipment Co. Ltd. | China | 59 | 23 | 36 | 134 | 9 | 25 |
| Toku-Hanbai Group | Japan | 350 | 141 | 209 | 858 | 8 | 50 |
| Reintube S.L. | Spain | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 | – | 47 |
1) The Atlas Copco percentage share of each holding represents both ownership interest and voting power.
The above table is based on the most recent financial reporting available from associated companies.
15. Other financial assets
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current | ||
| Pension and other similar benefit assets (note 23) | 662 | 608 |
| Derivatives | ||
| – not designated for hedge accounting | 1 | 3 |
| – designated for hedge accounting | 257 | 281 |
| Available-for-sale investments | 2 | 3 |
| Held-to-maturity investments | 182 | 103 |
| Financial assets classified as loans and receivables |
||
| – finance lease receivables | 503 | 598 |
| – other financial receivables | 974 | 1 117 |
| 2 581 | 2 713 | |
| Current | ||
| Held-to-maturity investments | 18 | 175 |
| Financial assets classified as loans and receivables |
||
| – finance lease receivables | 429 | 465 |
| – other financial receivables | 886 | 1 133 |
| 1 333 | 1 773 |
The maturity structure for held-to-maturity investments have changed from current to non-current. Fair value for other financial assets corresponds to carrying value shown in the table above. See note 22 on finance leases and note 27 for information on fair value derivatives, derivatives designated for hedge accounting, and credit risk.
16. Inventories
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Raw materials | 608 | 560 |
| Work in progress | 2 840 | 2 822 |
| Semi-finished goods | 4 530 | 4 693 |
| Finished goods | 9 675 | 9 504 |
| 17 653 | 17 579 |
Provisions for obsolescence and other write-downs of inventories recorded as cost of sales amounted to 527 (349). Reversals of write-downs which were recognized in earnings totaled 146 (157). Previous write-downs have been reversed as a result of improved market conditions in certain markets.
Inventories recognized as expense amounted to 41 823 (38 650). Inventories pledged as security for liabilities amounted to 23 (23), see note 26 for additional information.
17. Trade receivables
| Provisions for bad debts, trade | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions at Jan. 1 | 705 | 659 |
| Business acquisitions | 10 | 26 |
| Provisions recognized for potential losses | 417 | 366 |
| Amounts used for established losses | –199 | –215 |
| Release of unnecessary provisions | –130 | –124 |
| Change in discounted amounts | – | –4 |
| Translation differences | –36 | –3 |
| Provisions at Dec.31 | 767 | 705 |
Trade receivables of 15 960 (16 783) are reported net of provisions for doubtful accounts and other impairments amounting to 767 (705). Provisions for doubtful accounts and impairment losses recognized in the income statement totaled 417 (366).
Fair value for trade receivables corresponds to carrying value stated above. Trade receivables are categorized as loans and receivables. For credit risk information, see note 27.
18. Other receivables
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current | ||
| Derivatives | ||
| – not designated for hedge accounting | 180 | 40 |
| – designated for hedge accounting | 20 | 467 |
| Financial assets classified as loans and receivables |
||
| – other receivables | 2 240 | 2 597 |
| – accrued income | 1 336 | 1 005 |
| Prepaid expenses | 787 | 571 |
| 4 563 | 4 680 |
The decrease in value of derivatives designated for hedge accounting is an effect of the weakening of the USD to the EUR and lower interest rates levels.
Other receivables consist primarily of VAT claims and advances to suppliers. Accrued income consists primarily of work in progress. Prepaid expenses include items such as rent, insurance, interest, licenses, premiums, and commissions.
Fair value for other receivables corresponds to carrying value shown in the table above. See note 27 for additional information on fair value derivatives and derivatives designated for hedge accounting.
19. Cash and cash equivalents
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents classified as loans and receivables |
||
| – cash | 5 377 | 2 975 |
| – cash equivalents | 7 039 | 2 741 |
| 12 416 | 5 716 |
The increase in cash and cash equivalents was the result of continued profitability. During 2012, cash and cash equivalents had an estimated average effective interest rate of 0.73% (1.47). The committed but unutilized credit facilities equaled 6 390 (15 757).
Fair value for cash and cash equivalents corresponds to carrying value shown in the table above. See note 27 for additional information.
20. Equity
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shares outstanding | A shares | B shares | Total | A shares | B shares | Total | |
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 839 394 096 | 390 219 008 | 1 229 613 104 | 839 394 096 | 390 219 008 | 1 229 613 104 | |
| Split of shares 2:1 | – | – | – | 839 394 096 | 390 219 008 | 1 229 613 104 | |
| 839 394 096 | 390 219 008 | 1 229 613 104 | 1 678 788 192 | 780 438 016 | 2 459 226 208 | ||
| Redemption of shares | – | – | – | –824 811 735 | –388 682 016 | –1 213 493 751 | |
| Redemption of shares held by AtlasCopco | – | – | – | –14 582 361 | –1 536 992 | –16 119 353 | |
| Total number of shares, Dec. 31 | 839 394 096 | 390 219 008 | 1 229 613 104 | 839 394 096 | 390 219 008 | 1 229 613 104 | |
| – of which held by Atlas Copco | –15 372 649 | –818 280 | –16 190 929 | –16 687 630 | –1 311 446 | –17 999 076 | |
| Total shares outstanding, Dec. 31 | 824 021 447 | 389 400 728 | 1 213 422 175 | 822 706 466 | 388 907 562 | 1 211 614 028 |
At December 31, 2012, Atlas Copco AB's share capital amounted to SEK 786 008 190 distributed among 1 229 613 104 shares, each with a quota value of approximately SEK 0.64 (0.64). Series A shares entitle the holder to one voting right and series B shares entitle the holder to one-tenth of a voting right per share.
Atlas Copco generated significant cash flows during the 2009 financial crisis and also in 2010, resulting in a strong financial position. To adjust the Group's capital structure without jeopardizing the capacity to finance further growth, the 2011 Annual General Meeting (AGM) approved a redemption procedure that was carried out during 2011. The total distribution to the shareholders was SEK 6 067 468 755, taking into account that 16 119 353 shares were held by Atlas Copco AB and thus not eligible for repayment.
| Number of shares | Cost value affecting equity |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repurchases/ Divestment of shares |
2012 | AGM mandate 2012 Apr.–Dec. |
AGM mandate 2011 Jan.–Mar. |
2011 | AGM mandate 2011 Apr.–Dec. |
AGM mandate 2010 Jan.–Mar. |
2012 | 2011 |
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 17 999 076 | 11 236 873 | 2 116 | 1 011 | ||||
| Repurchase of A shares | 2 751 525 | 2 451 525 | 300 000 | 9 169 360 | 3 369 360 | 5 800 000 | 477 | 1 368 |
| Divestment of A shares | –4 066 506 | –1 798 487 | –2 268 019 | –2 006 570 | –1 715 809 | –290 761 | –498 | –236 |
| Divestment of B shares | –493 166 | –320 599 | –172 567 | –400 587 | –279 427 | –121 160 | –34 | –27 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 16 190 929 | 17 999 076 | 2 061 | 2 116 | ||||
| Percentage of shares outstanding | 1.3% | 1.5% |
The 2012 AGM approved a mandate for the Board of Directors to repurchase and sell series A shares and series B shares on the NASDAQ OMX Stockholm in order to fulfill the obligations under the performance stock option plan or to adapt the capital structure of the Company. The mandate is valid until the next AGM and allows:
- • The purchase of not more than 4 550 000 series A shares, whereof a maximum 3 500 000 may be transferred to personnel stock option holders under the performance stock option plan 2012.
- • The purchase of not more than 70 000 series A shares, later to be sold on the market in connection with payment to board members who have opted to receive synthetic shares as part of their board fee.
- • The sale of not more than 15 000 series A shares to cover costs related to previously issued synthetic shares to board members.
- • The sale of maximum of 4 700 000 series A shares in order to cover the obligations under the performance stock option plans 2008 and 2009, and the sale of maximum 1 200 000 series B shares to cover the corresponding costs for the plan 2007.
The 2011 AGM approved a mandate for the Board of Directors to repurchase and sell series A shares and series B shares on the NASDAQ OMX Stockholm in order to fulfill the obligations under the performance stock option plan or to adapt the capital structure of the Company. The mandate was valid until the 2012 AGM and allowed:
- • The purchase of not more than 4 300 000 series A shares, whereof a maximum 3 420 000 may be transferred to personnel stock option holders under the performance stock option plan 2011.
- • The purchase of not more than 70 000 series A shares, later to be sold on the market in connection with payment to board members who have opted to receive synthetic shares as part of their board fee.
- • The sale of not more than 70 000 series A shares to cover costs related to previously issued synthetic shares to board members.
- • The sale of maximum 4 700 000 series A shares and maximum 1 500 000 series B shares then held by the company, for the purpose of covering costs of fulfilling obligations related to the performance stock option plans 2006–2009.
Repurchases and sales are subject to market conditions, regulatory restrictions, and the capital structure at any given time. During 2012, 1 314 981 series A shares and 493 166 series B shares were divested, net, in accordance with mandates granted in the 2011 and 2012 AGMs. Further information regarding repurchases and sales in accordance with AGM mandates is presented in the table above.
The series A shares are held for possible delivery under the 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 personnel stock option programs. The series B shares held can be divested over time to cover costs related to the personnel stock option programs, including social insurance charges, cash settlements or performance of alternative incentive solutions in countries where allotment of employee stock options is unsuitable. The total number of shares of series A and series B held by Atlas Copco is presented in the table above.
Reserves
Consolidated equity includes certain reserves which are described below:
Hedging reserve
The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of net changes in fair value for certain cash flow hedging instruments.
Translation reserve
The translation reserve comprises all exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations, the translation of intra-group receivables from or liabilities to foreign operations that in substance are part of the net investment in the foreign operations, as well as from the translation of liabilities that hedge the company's net investments in foreign operations.
Fair value reserve
The fair value reserve comprises the cumulative net change in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets until the investments are derecognized or impaired. See note 27 for information on capital management.
Appropriation of profit
The Board of Directors proposes a dividend of SEK 5.50 (5.00) per share, totaling SEK 6 673 821 963 if shares held by the company on December 31, 2012 are excluded. For further information see appropriation of profit on page 19.
The proposed dividend for 2011 of SEK 5.00 per share, as approved by the AGM on April 27, 2012, was accordingly paid by Atlas Copco AB. Total dividend paid amounted to SEK 6 068 822 070.
21. Borrowings
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maturity | Repurchased nominal amount |
Carrying amount |
Fair value | Carrying amount |
Fair value | |
| Non-current | ||||||
| Medium Term Note Program MSE K 3 000 |
2012 | MSE K 505 |
– | – | 2 540 | 2 557 |
| Medium Term Note Program MEUR 600 |
2014 | MEUR 260 |
3 042 | 3 173 | 5 665 | 6 046 |
| Medium Term Note Program MEUR 500 |
2019 | 4 307 | 4 731 | – | – | |
| Capital market borrowings MUS D 800 |
2017 | 5 860 | 6 604 | 6 273 | 7 086 | |
| Capital market borrowings MUS D 150 |
2019 | MUS D 7.5 |
931 | 1 358 | 985 | 1 453 |
| Bilateral borrowings EIB MEUR 213 |
2014 | 1 834 | 1 837 | 1 903 | 1 909 | |
| Bilateral borrowings EIB MEUR 275 |
2019 | 2 369 | 2 460 | – | – | |
| Bilateral borrowings NIB MEUR 100 |
2015 | 862 | 866 | 894 | 900 | |
| Bilateral borrowings NIB MSE K 705 |
2016 | 705 | 718 | 705 | 721 | |
| Other bank loans | 392 | 392 | 452 | 452 | ||
| Less current portion of long-term borrowings | –272 | –272 | –2 664 | –2 681 | ||
| Total non-current loans | 20 030 | 21 867 | 16 753 | 18 443 | ||
| Financial lease liabilities | 72 | 72 | 66 | 66 | ||
| Other financial liabilities | 48 | 48 | 194 | 194 | ||
| 20 150 | 21 987 | 17 013 | 18 703 | |||
| Current | ||||||
| Current portion of long-term borrowings | 272 | 272 | 2 664 | 2 681 | ||
| Short term loans | 593 | 593 | 718 | 718 | ||
| Financial lease liabilities | 37 | 37 | 40 | 40 | ||
| 902 | 902 | 3 422 | 3 439 | |||
| 21 052 | 22 889 | 20 435 | 22 142 | |||
The difference between carrying value and fair value is due to that certain liabilities are reported at their amortized cost, and not at fair value. See additional information about the Group's exposure to interest rate risk and foreign currency risk in note 27.
Atlas Copco has a long-term debt rating of A2 (A3) from Moody's Investor Service, Inc. and A (A) from Standard & Poor's Corporation. Other than standard undertakings such as negative pledge and pari passu, the various interest-bearing loans and borrowings do not contain any financial covenants.
The Group's back-up facilities are specified in the table below.
| Nominal amount |
Maturity | Utilized | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Back-up facilities | |||
| Medium Term Note Program 1, 3) MUS | D 3 000 | – | MUS D 1 451 |
| Commercial papers 1, 2) | MSE K 15 977 |
– | – |
| Credit-line | MSE K 6 390 |
2017 | – |
| Equivalent in SEK | MSEK 41 959 | MSEK 9 476 |
1) Interest is based on market conditions at the time when the facility is utilized. Maturity date is set when the facility is utilized.
2) The maximum amounts available under these programs total MUSD 1 000,
MEUR 400 and MSEK 6 000 corresponding to a total of MSEK 15 977 (16 484).
3) Utilized nominal amounts MEUR 600 and MEUR 500, which corresponds to MUSD 1 451.
The Group's short-term and long-term loans are distributed among the currencies detailed in the table below.
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Local currency (millions) |
MSEK | % | Local currency (millions) |
MSEK | % |
| EUR | 1 451 | 12 502 | 59 | 980 | 8 758 | 43 |
| SEK | 820 | 820 | 4 | 3 278 | 3 278 | 16 |
| USD | 1 051 | 6 865 | 33 | 1 072 | 7 406 | 36 |
| Other | – | 865 | 4 | – | 993 | 5 |
| 21 052 | 100 | 20 435 | 100 |
The following table shows the maturity structure of the Group's loans and includes the effect of interest rate swaps.
| 2012 Maturity | Fixed | Floating | Carrying amount |
Fair value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | – | 902 | 902 | 902 |
| 2014 | 3 042 | 1 965 | 5 007 | 5 142 |
| 2015 | – | 905 | 905 | 910 |
| 2016 | – | 736 | 736 | 748 |
| 2017 | 4 395 | 1 495 | 5 890 | 6 633 |
| 2018 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2019 | 7 607 | 1 | 7 608 | 8 550 |
| 2020 | – | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 15 044 | 6 008 | 21 052 | 22 889 |
Operating leases – lessee
The leasing costs of assets under operating leases amounted to 803 (716), and are derived primarily from rented premises, machinery, and computer and office equipment. Operating leasing contracts for office and factory facilities typically run for a period of 10 to 15 years. The total leasing cost includes minimum lease payments of 768 (683), contingent rent of 47 (40), and sublease payments received of 12 (7). Future payments for noncancelable operating leasing contracts fall due as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Less than one year | 588 | 560 |
| Between one and five years | 1 080 | 1 086 |
| More than five years | 218 | 278 |
| 1 886 | 1 924 |
The total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received was 36 (41).
Finance leases – lessee
Assets utilized under finance leases
| Machinery and equipment |
Rental equipment |
|
|---|---|---|
| Carrying amounts, Jan. 1, 2012 | 114 | 12 |
| Carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2012 | 119 | 7 |
| Carrying amounts, Jan. 1, 2011 | 106 | 13 |
| Carrying amounts, Dec. 31, 2011 | 114 | 12 |
Assets utilized under finance lease are comprised primarily of vehicles.
Operating leases – lessor
Atlas Copco has equipment which is leased to customers under operating leases. Future payments for non-cancelable operating leasing contracts fall due as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Less than one year | 261 | 492 |
| Between one and five years | 246 | 420 |
| More than five years | 39 | 17 |
| 546 | 929 |
The decrease in operating leases is primarily due to the sale of leasing contracts related to Atlas Copco Customer Finance, see note 3.
Future payments for assets provided under finance leases as lessee will fall due as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum lease payments |
Interest | Principal | Minimum lease payments |
Interest | Principal | |
| Less than one year | 43 | 6 | 37 | 48 8 |
40 | |
| Between one and five years | 80 | 10 | 70 | 73 8 |
65 | |
| More than five years | 2 | – | 2 | 1 | – 1 |
|
| 125 | 16 | 109 | 122 16 |
106 |
Finance leases – lessor
The Group offers lease financing to customers via Atlas Copco Customer Finance and certain other subsidiaries. Future lease payments to be received fall due as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross investment |
Present value of minimum lease payments |
Gross investment |
Present value of minimum lease payments |
||
| Less than one year | 451 | 429 | 524 | 465 | |
| Between one and five years | 534 | 485 | 642 | 565 | |
| More than five years | 20 | 18 | 36 | 33 | |
| 1 005 | 932 | 1 202 | 1 063 | ||
| Unearned finance income | – | 73 | – | 139 | |
| 1 005 | 1 005 | 1 202 | 1 202 |
23. Employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
| The net pension obligations have been recorded in the balance sheets as follows: |
||
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |
| Financial assets (note 15) | –662 | –608 |
| Post-employment benefits | 1 401 | 1 504 |
| Other provisions (note 25) | 85 | 76 |
| Total, net | 824 | 972 |
Atlas Copco provides post-employment defined benefit pensions and benefits in most of its major locations. The most significant countries in terms of size of plans are Belgium, Canada, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Some plans are funded in advance with certain assets or funds held separately from the Group for future benefit payment obligations. Other plans are unfunded and the benefits from those plans are paid by the Group as they fall due.
The plans in Belgium cover early retirement, jubilee, and termination indemnity. All of the plans are unfunded.
In Canada, Atlas Copco provides a pension plan and a supplemental retirement pension benefit plan for executives. Both plans are funded. There are also two unfunded plans, a post-retirement benefit plan and a post-employment plan.
The German plans include those for pensions, early retirements and jubilee. All German plans are unfunded.
There are three defined benefit pension plans in Sweden. The ITP plan is a final salary pension plan covering the majority of white collar employees in Sweden. Atlas Copco finances the benefits through a pension foundation. The second plan relates to a group of employees earning more than ten income base amounts that has opted out from the ITP plan. This plan is insured. The third defined benefit pension plan relates to former senior
employees now retired. In Sweden, in addition to benefits relating to retirement pensions, Atlas Copco has obligations for family pensions for many of the Swedish employees, which are funded through a third party insurer, Alecta. This plan is accounted for as a defined contribution plan as sufficient information is not available for calculating the net pension obligation.
There is a final salary pension plan in the United Kingdom. This plan is funded. In 2010, the plan was converted to a defined contribution plan for future services.
In the United States, Atlas Copco provides a pension plan, a postretirement medical plan, and a number of supplemental retirement pension benefits for executives. The pension plan is funded while the other plans are unfunded.
The tables below show the Group's benefit obligations, the assumptions used to determine these obligations and the assets relating to the benefit obligations, as well as the amounts recognized in the income statements and the balance sheets.
The provision for post-employment benefits amounted to 813 (955). The decrease of 142 is primarily due to that the increase of defined benefit obligations are offset by an increase in unrecognized actuarial losses and minor increase in plan assets. The increase in defined benefit obligations is mainly due to lower discount rates used in 2012 compared to the discount rates used in 2011. The unrecognized actuarial losses increased with 440 to 1 209 (769) primarily due to the decrease in discount rates.
The actual return on plan assets totaled 256 (543). Return on plan assets for the Group was overall in line with expectations, with higher than expected returns in the United States, Sweden, Switzerland and Canada being offset by lower return on investments in the United Kingdom.
The total benefit expense for defined benefit plans amounted to 274 (291), whereof 204 (181) has been charged to operating expenses and 70 (110) to financial expenses.
Post-employment benefits
| 2012 | Funded pension plans |
Unfunded pension plan |
Other unfunded plans |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present value of defined benefit obligations | 5 912 | 1 543 | 235 | 7 690 |
| Fair value of plan assets | –5 659 | – | – | –5 659 |
| Present value of net obligations | 253 | 1 543 | 235 | 2 031 |
| Unrecognized past service cost | –3 | –6 | – | –9 |
| Unrecognized actuarial gains (+) / losses (–) | –940 | –309 | 40 | –1 209 |
| Recognized liability for defined benefit obligations | –690 | 1 228 | 275 | 813 |
| Other long-term service liabilities | – | – | 11 | 11 |
| Net amount recognized in balance sheet | –690 | 1 228 | 286 | 824 |
| 2011 | ||||
| Present value of defined benefit obligations | 5 640 | 1 424 | 221 | 7 285 |
| Fair value of plan assets | –5 553 | – | – | –5 553 |
| Present value of net obligations | 87 | 1 424 | 221 | 1 732 |
| Unrecognized past service cost | –1 | –7 | – | –8 |
| Unrecognized actuarial gains (+) / losses (–) | –728 | –101 | 60 | –769 |
| Recognized liability for defined benefit obligations | –642 | 1 316 | 281 | 955 |
| Other long-term service liabilities | – | – | 17 | 17 |
| Net amount recognized in balance sheet | –642 | 1 316 | 298 | 972 |
| Movement in plan assets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||
| Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1 | 5 553 | 5 078 | ||
| Expected return on plan assets | 243 | 211 | ||
| Difference between expected and actual return on plan assets |
13 | 332 | ||
| Settlements | –32 | –82 | ||
| Employer contributions | 191 | 358 | ||
| Plan members contributions | 16 | 16 | ||
| Benefits paid by the plan | –205 | –407 | ||
| Translation differences | –120 | 47 | ||
| Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31 | 5 659 | 5 553 | ||
Plan assets consist of the following:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity securities | 669 | 657 |
| Bonds | 2 740 | 3 466 |
| Other | 1 968 | 1 167 |
| Cash | 282 | 263 |
| 5 659 | 5 553 |
The plan assets are allocated among the following geographic areas:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Europe | 4 042 | 3 990 |
| North America | 1 566 | 1 520 |
| Rest of the world | 51 | 43 |
| 5 659 | 5 553 |
Plan assets include 12 (11) of Atlas Copco AB series B shares. Plan assets do not include any property which is occupied by members of the Group.
| Movement in present value of the obligations for defined benefits | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||
| Defined benefit obligations at Jan. 1 | 7 285 | 6 742 | ||
| Service cost | 171 | 155 | ||
| Interest expense | 313 | 321 | ||
| Actuarial experience gains (–) / losses (+) | 106 | –18 | ||
| Actuarial assumptions gains (–) / losses (+) | 416 | 544 | ||
| Business acquisitions/ divestments | 23 | –2 | ||
| Settlements | –33 | –81 | ||
| Benefits paid from plan or company assets | –399 | –407 | ||
| Other | 1 | –1 | ||
| Translation differences | –193 | 32 | ||
| Defined benefit obligations at Dec. 31 | 7 690 | 7 285 |
The defined benefit obligations for employee benefits are comprised of plans in the following geographic areas:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Europe | 5 626 | 5 412 |
| North America | 1 900 | 1 743 |
| Rest of the world | 164 | 130 |
| 7 690 | 7 285 |
| Expenses recognized in the income statement | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |
| Service cost | 171 | 155 |
| Interest expense | 313 | 321 |
| Expected return on plan assets | –243 | –211 |
| Employee contribution | –16 | –16 |
| Past service cost | –1 | 1 |
| Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss | 45 | 18 |
| Settlement/curtailment | 5 | 23 |
| 274 | 291 |
The expenses are recognized in the following line
| items in the income statement: | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of sales | 78 | 66 |
| Marketing expenses | 53 | 44 |
| Administrative expenses | 48 | 55 |
| Research and development expenses | 25 | 16 |
| Financial expenses (note 9) | 70 | 110 |
| 274 | 291 |
| Principal actuarial assumptions at the balance sheet date | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (expressed as weighted averages, in %) | 2012 | 2011 | ||
| Discount rate | ||||
| Europe | 3.64 | 4.19 | ||
| North America | 3.92 | 4.88 | ||
| Expected return on plan assets | ||||
| Europe | 3.80 | 4.58 | ||
| North America | 3.30 | 4.85 | ||
| Future salary increases | ||||
| Europe | 2.84 | 2.91 | ||
| North America | 3.51 | 3.51 | ||
| Medical cost trend rate | ||||
| North America | 9.00 | 9.00 | ||
| Future pension increases | ||||
| Europe | 1.98 | 2.28 | ||
| North America | 0.38 | 0.34 |
The discount rate is determined by reference to market yields at the balance sheet date using, if available, high quality corporate bonds (AAA or AA) matching the duration of the pension obligations. In countries where corporate bonds are not available, government bonds are used to determine the discount rate. In Sweden, in line with prior years, mortgage bonds are used for determining the discount rate.
The expected return on plan assets is based on yields for government bonds with the addition of an equity risk premium in respect of equity related instruments. The assumption also reflects the allocation of assets for the respective plans as well as the particular yields for the respective country or region.
Expected salary increase is in most countries based on a real salary increase of 1% plus inflation. Although the absolute rate of earnings increase granted from year to year may appear volatile, over the longer term a higher degree of stability is seen when increases are expressed in real terms.
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts recognized in profit and loss for post-employment medical plans. A one percentage point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects:
Medical cost trend rate
| One percentage point increase |
One percentage point decrease |
|
|---|---|---|
| Effect on aggregate service cost, in % | 11.50 | –9.90 |
| Effect on defined benefit obligation, in % | 7.90 | –6.80 |
| Historical information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |
| Present value of defined benefit obligations |
7 690 | 7 285 | 6 725 | 6 695 | 6 741 |
| Fair value of plan assets | 5 659 | 5 553 | 5 064 | 4 852 | 4 863 |
| Present value of net obligations |
2 031 | 1 732 | 1 661 | 1 843 | 1 878 |
| Experience adjustments relating to: | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
| Plan assets | 13 | 332 | 289 | –152 | –293 | |
| Plan liabilities | 106 | –18 | 125 | –56 | –33 |
The Group expects to pay 308 (270) in contributions to defined benefit plans in 2013. Expenses related to defined contribution plans amounted to 677 (585).
Share value based incentive programs
In 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the Annual General Meeting decided on performance based personnel stock option programs based on a proposal from the Board reflecting an option program for the respective years. In 2012, the Annual General Meeting decided on a performance based personnel stock option program for 2012 similar to the 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 programs.
Option programs 2007–2012
At the Annual General Meeting 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively, it was decided to implement performance related personnel stock option programs. The decision to grant options was made in May/ June each year and the options were issued in March the following year (issue date). The number of options issued each program year depended on the value creation in the Group, measured as Economic Value Added (EVA), for the respective program year. For the 2012 option program, the number of options varies on a linear basis within a preset EVA interval. The size of the plan and the limits of the interval have been established by the Board and have been approved by the Annual General Meeting and are compatible with the long term business plan of the Group.
In connection to the issue, the exercise price was calculated as 110% of the average trading price for series A shares during a ten day period following the date of the publishing of the fourth quarter report. The options were issued without compensation paid by the employee and the options issued 2007–2008 remain the property of the employee also if the employment is terminated. For the 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 programs the options remain the property of the employee only to the extent that they are exercisable at the time employment is terminated. The 2007–2009 programs have a term of five years from the issue date and the options are not transferable. The 2010, 2011 and 2012 programs have a term of five years from the grant date and the options are not transferable. The options in the programs 2007–2009 are exercisable at a rate of one third per year, starting one year after the issue date. The options in the 2010, 2011 and 2012 programs become exercisable at 100% three years after grant.
The 2010, 2011 and 2012 programs include a requirement for senior executives (31 in total) to purchase Atlas Copco A shares for 10% of their gross base salary in order to be granted options. In the 2011 and 2012 programs there is also a choice to deposit privately owned shares as an alternative to purchase shares. A lower amount of investment will reduce the number of options proportionately. Further, senior executives who have invested in Atlas Copco A shares will have the option to purchase one matching share per each share purchased or deposited (2011 and 2012 programs) at a price equal to 75% of the average trading price for series A shares during a ten day period following the date of the publishing of the fourth quarter report. This right applies from three years after grant until the expiration of the stock option program.
The Board had the right to decide to implement an alternative incentive solution (SARs) for key persons in such countries where the grant of personnel options was not feasible.
In the 2008–2012 programs the options may, on request by an optionee in Sweden, be settled by the Company paying cash equal to the excess of the closing price of the shares over the exercise price on the exercise day, less any administrative fees. Due to this choice of settlement by the Swedish employees, these options are classified for accounting purposes as cash-settled in accordance with IFRS 2.
The Black-Scholes model is used to calculate the fair value of the options/SARs in the programs at issue date. Since the issue date for the 2012 program will be in March 2013, the fair value has been simulated through a Monte Carlo model of what it may be established at in March 2013. For the programs in 2012 and 2011, the fair value of the options/ SARs was based on the following assumptions:
| Key assumptions | 2012 Program (Dec. 31, 2012) |
2011 Program (at Issue date) |
|---|---|---|
| Expected exercise price | SEK 197/134 1) | SEK 184/125 1) 2) |
| Expected volatility | 35% | 35% |
| Expected options life (years) | 3.05 | 3.05 |
| Expected share price | SEK 179.10 | SEK 157.50 |
| Expected dividend (growth) | SEK 5.50 (10%) | SEK 5.00 (10%) |
| Risk free interest rate | 0.80% | 1.20% |
| Expected average grant value | SEK 28.30/50.34 1) | SEK 22.47/41.23 1) 2) |
| Maximum number of options | 4 385 494 | 3 464 760 |
| – of which forfeited | 166 094 | 198 432 |
| Number of matching shares | 43 646 | 39 495 |
1) Matching shares for senior executives. 2) Actual.
The expected volatility has been determined by analyzing the historic development of the Atlas Copco A share price as well as other shares on the stock market.
When determining the expected option life, assumptions have been made regarding the expected exercising behavior of different categories of optionees.
For stock options in the 2007–2008 programs, the fair value is recognized as an expense over the period May through March the following year, while for the stock options in the 2009 program, the fair value is recognized as an expense over the period June 2009 through March 2013. For the stock options in the 2010 program, the fair value is recognized as an expense over the period June 2010 through April 2013. For the stock options in the 2011 program, the fair value is recognized as an expense over the period June 2011 through April 2014. For the stock options in the 2012 program, the fair value is recognized as an expense over the period June 2012 through April 2015. For the 2012 program, a new valuation of the fair value has been made and will be made at each reporting date until the issue date.
Timeline 2012 option plan
| Plan expires | Issue of options |
Exercise price set |
Senior executives own investments |
Information of grant |
Annual General Meeting |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Options and matching shares exercisable | Vesting period | |||||
| May 1, 2015 May 1, 2017 |
Mar. 2013 | Feb. 2013 | Nov. 2012 | Jun. 2012 | Apr. 2012 |
For SARs and the options classified as cash-settled, the fair value is recognized as an expense over the same vesting period; the fair value is, however, remeasured at each reporting date and changes in the fair value after the end of the vesting period continue to be recognized as a personnel expense.
In accordance with IFRS 2, the expense in 2012 for all share-based incentive programs amounted to 184 (15) excluding social costs of which 50 (34) refers to equity-settled options. The related costs for social security contributions are accounted for in accordance with the statement from the Swedish Financial Reporting Board (UFR 7) and are classified as personnel expenses.
In the balance sheet, the provision for share appreciation rights and stock options classified as cash-settled as of December 31 amounted to 223 (191). Atlas Copco shares are held by the Parent Company in order to cover commitments under the programs 2007–2012, see also note 20.
| Summary of share value based incentive programs | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program | Initial number of employees |
Initial number of options |
Expiration date |
Exercise price, SEK |
Type of share |
Fair value on grant date |
Intrinsic value for vested SARs |
| Stock options | |||||||
| 2006 | 183 | 3 297 784 | Mar. 30, 12 | 107.83 | A | 32.78 | – |
| 2007 | 177 | 3 222 149 | Mar. 30, 13 | 101.94 | A | 132.50 | – |
| 2008 | 198 | 3 570 079 | Mar. 20, 14 | 68.93 | A | 22.32 | – |
| 2009 | 222 | 3 902 878 | Mar. 20, 15 | 104.86 | A | 28.59 | – |
| 2010 | 221 | 3 796 922 | Apr. 30, 15 | 166.99 | A | 28.32 | – |
| 2011 | 224 | 2 735 804 | Apr. 30, 16 | 184.00 | A | 22.47 | – |
| Matching shares | |||||||
| 2010 | 21 | 38 334 | Apr. 30, 15 | 113.59 | A | 53.40 | – |
| 2011 | 20 | 39 495 | Apr. 30, 16 | 125.00 | A | 41.23 | – |
| Share appreciation rights | |||||||
| 2006 | 36 | 559 608 | Mar. 30, 12 | 107.83 | A | – | 70.47 |
| 2007 | 38 | 589 966 | Mar. 30, 13 | 101.94 | A | – | 76.36 |
| 2008 | 41 | 635 348 | Mar. 20, 14 | 68.93 | A | – | 109.37 |
| 2009 | 47 | 741 240 | Mar. 20, 15 | 104.86 | A | – | 73.44 |
| 2010 | 49 | 756 351 | Apr. 30, 15 | 166.99 | A | – | 11.31 |
| 2011 | 48 | 530 524 | Apr. 30, 16 | 184.00 | A | – | –5.70 |
Number of options/rights 2012
| Program | Outstanding Jan.1 |
Granted | Exercised | Expired/ forfeited |
Outstanding Dec. 31 |
–of which exercisable |
Time to expiration, in months |
Average stock price for exercised options, SEK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock options | ||||||||
| 2006 | 893 092 | – | 771 949 | 121 143 | – | – | – | 168 |
| 2007 | 1 813 790 | – | 1 370 688 | – | 443 102 | 443 102 | 3 | 167 |
| 2008 1) | 2 635 218 | – | 1 279 344 | – | 1 355 874 | 1 355 874 | 15 | 165 |
| 2009 2) | 1 573 712 | – | 359 368 | 13 614 | 1 200 730 | 658 419 | 27 | 166 |
| 2010 3) | 3 615 378 | – | – | 90 763 | 3 524 615 | – | 28 | – |
| 2011 4) | 2 735 804 | – | – | 32 481 | 2 703 323 | – | 40 | – |
| Matching shares | ||||||||
| 2010 | 31 344 | – | – | 3 564 | 27 780 | – | 28 | – |
| 2011 | 39 495 | – | – | – | 39 495 | – | 40 | – |
| Share appreciation rights | ||||||||
| 2006 | 82 746 | – | 82 746 | – | – | – | – | 169 |
| 2007 | 211 146 | – | 158 138 | – | 53 008 | 53 008 | 3 | 168 |
| 2008 | 395 834 | – | 224 432 | – | 171 402 | 171 402 | 15 | 167 |
| 2009 | 292 703 | – | 60 725 | – | 231 978 | 125 333 | 27 | 167 |
| 2010 | 756 351 | – | – | – | 756 351 | – | 28 | – |
| 2011 | 530 524 | – | – | 10 827 | 519 697 | – | 40 | – |
All numbers have been adjusted for the effect of share split in 2007 and the redemption in 2011 in line with the method used by NASDAQ OMX Stockholm to adjust exchange-traded options contracts.
1) Of which 537 668 have been accounted for as cash settled.
2) Of which 483 850 have been accounted for as cash settled.
3) Of which 1 361 447 have been accounted for as cash settled.
4) Of which 1 068 439 have been accounted for as cash settled.
| Number of options/rights 2011 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program | Outstanding Jan.1 |
Granted | Exercised | Expired/ forfeited |
Outstanding Dec. 31 |
–of which exercisable |
Time to expiration, in months |
Average stock price for exercised options, SEK |
| Stock options | ||||||||
| 2006 | 1 770 105 | – | 861 886 | 15 127 | 893 092 | 893 092 | 3 | 157 |
| 2007 | 2 396 100 | – | 582 310 | – | 1 813 790 | 1 813 790 | 15 | 155 |
| 2008 | 2 980 107 | – | 344 889 | – | 2 635 218 | 1 520 906 | 27 | 158 |
| 2009 | 1 738 083 | – | 103 106 | 61 265 | 1 573 712 | 470 955 | 39 | 160 |
| 2010 | 3 796 922 | – | – | 181 544 | 3 615 378 | – | 40 | – |
| 2011 | – | 2 735 804 | – | – | 2 735 804 | – | 52 | – |
| Matching shares | ||||||||
| 2010 | 38 334 | – | – | 6 990 | 31 344 | – | 40 | – |
| 2011 | – | 39 495 | – | – | 39 495 | – | 52 | – |
| Share appreciation rights | ||||||||
| 2006 | 171 216 | – | 88 470 | – | 82 746 | 82 746 | 3 | 156 |
| 2007 | 371 657 | – | 160 511 | – | 211 146 | 211 146 | 15 | 160 |
| 2008 | 505 142 | – | 109 308 | – | 395 834 | 199 195 | 27 | 150 |
| 2009 | 324 468 | – | 27 227 | 4 538 | 292 703 | 79 415 | 39 | 163 |
| 2010 | 756 351 | – | – | – | 756 351 | – | 40 | – |
| 2011 | – | 530 524 | – | – | 530 524 | – | 52 | – |
All numbers have been adjusted for the effect of share split in 2007 and the redemption in 2011 in line with the method used by NASDAQ OMX Stockholm to adjust exchange-traded options contracts.
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current | ||
| Derivatives | ||
| – not designated for hedge accounting | 40 | 224 |
| – designated for hedge accounting | 741 | 370 |
| Other financial liabilities | ||
| – other liabilities | 2 320 | 2 315 |
| – accrued expenses | 4 900 | 4 769 |
| Advances from customers | 2 429 | 2 724 |
| Prepaid income | 63 | 54 |
| Deferred revenues service contracts | 569 | 539 |
| 11 062 | 10 995 |
Accrued expenses and prepaid income include items such as social costs, vacation pay liability, accrued interest, and accrued operational expenses.
Fair value for other liabilities corresponds to carrying value shown in the table above. See note 27 for information on the Group's derivatives.
| 2012 | Product warranty | Restructuring | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 938 | 156 | 783 | 1 877 |
| During the year | ||||
| – provisions made | 988 | 117 | 311 | 1 416 |
| – provisions used | –839 | –89 | –163 | –1 091 |
| – provisions reversed | –134 | –31 | –37 | –202 |
| Business acquisitions | 12 | – | 5 | 17 |
| Translation differences | –40 | –3 | –32 | –75 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 925 | 150 | 867 | 1 942 |
| Non-current | 107 | 35 | 609 | 751 |
| Current | 818 | 115 | 258 | 1 191 |
| 925 | 150 | 867 | 1 942 |
| 2012, Maturity |
Product warranty | Restructuring | Other | Total provisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than one year | 818 | 115 | 258 | 1 191 |
| Between one and five years | 106 | 14 | 522 | 642 |
| More than five years | 1 | 21 | 87 | 109 |
| 925 | 150 | 867 | 1 942 |
| 2011 | Product warranty | Restructuring | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 906 | 84 | 1 140 | 2 130 |
| During the year | ||||
| – provisions made | 854 | 108 | 204 | 1 166 |
| – provisions used | –715 | –32 | –406 | –1 153 |
| – provisions reversed | –118 | –4 | –137 | –259 |
| Business acquisitions | 13 | – | – | 13 |
| Translation differences | –2 | – | –18 | –20 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 938 | 156 | 783 | 1 877 |
| Non-current | 84 | 39 | 548 | 671 |
| Current | 854 | 117 | 235 | 1 206 |
| 938 | 156 | 783 | 1 877 |
Other provisions consist primarily of amounts related to share-based payments including social fees, jubilee benefits (see note 23), and environmental remediation obligations.
26. Assets pledged and contingent liabilities
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Assets pledged for debts to credit institutions and other commitments |
||
| Inventory and tangible fixed assets | 32 | 36 |
| Endowment insurances | 55 | 55 |
| Other receivables | 38 | – |
| 125 | 91 |
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Contingent liabilities | ||
| Notes discounted | 7 | 16 |
| Sureties and other contingent liabilities | 155 | 97 |
| 162 | 113 |
Sureties and other contingent liabilities relate primarily to pension commitments and commitments related to customer claims and various legal matters.
27. Financial exposure and principles for control of financial risks
Capital management
Atlas Copco defines capital as borrowings and equity, which at December 31 totaled 56 130 (49 211). The Group's policy is to have an adequate capital structure to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to support future development of the business. The Board's opinion is that the dividend over a business cycle should correspond to about 50% of earnings per share. In recent years, the Board has also proposed, and the Annual General Meeting has approved, distributions of "excess" equity to the shareholders through share redemptions and share repurchases.
There are no external capital requirements imposed on the Group.
Financial risks
The Group is exposed to various financial risks in its operations. These financial risks include:
- • Funding and liquidity risk
- • Interest rate risk
- • Currency risk
- • Credit risk
- Other market and price risks
The Group's Financial Risk Management Committee (FRMC) establishes the overall policies and systems to ensure the monitoring and management of the Group's financial risks. The members of the FRMC are the CEO, CFO, Group Treasurer, and Head of Treasury Control. The FRMC meets on a quarterly basis or more often if circumstances require.
Group Treasury has the operational responsibility for financial risk management in the Group. Group Treasury manages and controls financial risk exposures, ensures that appropriate financing is in place through loans and committed credit facilities, and manages the Group's liquidity.
The following table shows maturity structure of the Group´s financial assets and liabilities. The figures shown are contractual undiscounted cash flows based on contracted date, when the Group is liable to pay or eligible to receive, and includes both interest and nominal amounts.
| Financial Instruments | up to 1 year |
1–5 years |
Over 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| Financial assets | – | 1 634 | 76 |
| Other receivables | – | 38 | – |
| Derivatives | 61 | 213 | – |
| Non-current financial assets | 61 | 1 885 | 76 |
| Trade receivables | 15 960 | – | – |
| Financial assets | 1 372 | – | – |
| Other receivables | 1 869 | – | – |
| Derivatives | 200 | – | – |
| Other accrued income | 1 336 | – | – |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 12 416 | – | – |
| Current financial assets | 33 153 | – | – |
| Financial assets | 33 214 | 1 885 | 76 |
| Liabilities | |||
| Liabilities to credit institutions | 680 | 14 585 | 8 045 |
| Other financial liabilities | – | 48 | – |
| Derivatives | 23 | 128 | 23 |
| Other liabilities | – | 113 | – |
| Non-current financial liabilities | 703 | 14 874 | 8 068 |
| Liabilities to credit institutions | 636 | – | – |
| Current portion of interest-bearing liabilities |
272 | – | – |
| Derivatives | 781 | – | – |
| Other accrued expenses | 4 900 | – | – |
| Trade payables | 6 700 | – | – |
| Other liabilities | 2 320 | – | – |
| Current financial liabilities | 15 609 | – | – |
| Financial liabilities | 16 312 | 14 874 | 8 068 |
Derivatives classified as assets dedicated for hedge accounting amount to 277 (748) and derivatives classified as liabilities classified for hedge accounting amount to 808 (370). Other derivatives are classified as held for trading.
Funding and liquidity risk
Funding risk is the risk that the Group does not have access to adequate financing on acceptable terms at any given point in time. Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group does not have access to its funds, when needed, due to poor market liquidity.
Group funding risk policy
- • The Group should maintain a minimum of MSEK 6 000 committed credit facilities to meet operational, strategic and rating objectives. Actual amount at year-end is 6 390 (15 757).
- • The average tenor (i.e. time until maturity) of the external debt should be at least 3 years. Actual tenor at year-end is 4.3 years (3.4).
- • No more than MSEK 5 000 of Atlas Copco AB's external debt may mature within the next 12 months. No external debt is maturing within the next twelve months (2 513).
- • Adequate funding at subsidiary level shall at all times be in place.
- • The market liquidity should be considered before entering into any financial transaction.
Status at year-end
As per December 31, there were no deviations from the Group funding risk policy. Cash and cash equivalents totaled 12 416 (5 716). The overall liquidity of the Group is strong considering the maturity profile of the external borrowings, the balance of cash and cash equivalent as of yearend, and available back-up credit facilities from banks. Please refer to note 21 for information on utilized borrowings, maturity, and back-up facilities.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the Group is negatively affected by changes in the interest rate level.
Group interest rate risk policy
The interest rate risk policy states that the average duration (i.e. period for which interest rates are fixed) should be a minimum of 6 months (6) and a maximum of 48 months (36).
Status at year-end
To manage interest rate risk, the Group uses interest rate swap agreements to convert interest on loans. The Group has entered into interest rate swaps to convert fixed interest rates to variable interest rates. These swaps are designated as fair value hedging instruments, with a nominal amount of MUSD 200 (unchanged from previous year). During 2012, the Group has also entered into interest rate swaps to convert variable interest rates to fixed interest rates on the loan of MEUR 275 which was drawn in September 2012 (for more information about loans, see note 21). These swaps are designated as cash-flow hedging instruments.
Including the effect of the derivatives, the effective interest rate and interest duration of the Group's borrowings at year-end was 2.8% (2.9) and 41 months (28) respectively. Excluding any derivatives, the Group's effective interest rate was 3.7% (4.7) and the average interest duration was 33 months (31).
| Outstanding derivative | 2012 | 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| instruments related to interest rate risk |
Fair value | Nominal amount |
Fair value | Nominal amount |
| Interest rate swaps, fair value hedge |
||||
| Assets | MSE K 257 MUS |
D 200 MSE | K 281 | MUS D 200 |
| Liabilities | – | – | – | – |
| Interest rate swaps, cash-flow hedge |
||||
| Assets | – | – | – | – |
| Liabilities | MSE K 68 MEUR |
275 | – | – |
The following tables show the estimated effect, in MSEK, of a parallel upward and downward shift of one percentage point (100 basis points) in all interest rates on external loans and on interest rate swaps hedging the loans.
The first table shows the estimated effect on the profit and loss before taxes. The second table shows the fair value effect on loans and interest rate swaps reported at fair value. Certain loans are reported at their amortized cost and are therefore not affected by changes in interest rate levels. For the interest rate swaps classified as cash flow hedges, the fair value effect is recognized in other comprehensive income in cases where the asset or liability is identified for hedge accounting.
| Interest sensitivity, earnings | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Earnings impact | Earnings impact | |
| Market interest rate +1% | –51 | –44 |
| Market interest rate –1% | 51 | 46 |
| Fair value interest sensitivity |
2012 | 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings impact |
OCI impact |
Earnings impact |
OCI impact |
|
| Market interest rate +1% | 4 | 146 | 3 | – |
| Market interest rate –1% | –4 | –158 | –3 | – |
Currency risk
The Group is present in various geographical markets and undertakes transactions denominated in foreign currencies and consequently, exposures to exchange rate fluctuations arise. This affects both transaction exposure (flow) and translation exposure (balance sheet). These two different exposures are explained separately below.
Transaction exposure
Group currency risk policy
Transaction exposure risk is the risk that profitability is negatively affected by changes in exchange rates, affecting flows in foreign currencies in the operations. Due to the Group's presence in various markets, there are
inflows and outflows in different currencies. As a normal part of business, net surpluses or deficits in specific currencies are created. The value of these net positions fluctuates with the changes in currency rates and, thus, a transaction exposure is created. The following describes the Group's general policies for managing transaction exposure:
- • Exposures should be reduced by matching in- and outflows of the same currencies.
- • Business area and divisional management are responsible for maintaining readiness to adjust their operations (price and cost) to compensate for adverse currency movements.
- • Based on the assumption that hedging does not have any significant positive or negative effect on the Group's results over the long term, the policy does not recommend transaction exposures to be hedged on an ongoing basis. Business areas and divisions should normally not hedge currency risks. Hedging can, however, be motivated in case of longterm contracts where there is no possibility to adjust the contract price or the associated costs.
- • The FRMC can from time to time decide if parts of the transaction exposure should be hedged. Transactions shall qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with IFRS and hedging beyond 18 months is not allowed.
Status at year-end
The Group has continued to manage transaction exposures primarily by matching in- and outflows in the same currencies. Derivative instruments have only been used to a limited extent to hedge operational flows and have primarily been used to hedge transactions in Australian dollars. The nominal outstanding amount in Australian dollar is 176 (126). The hedge ratio at December 31 was 6.8% (7.1). The fair value of the outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at December 31 was 18 (–45).
In addition, the Group has foreign exchange forward contracts, to a limited extent, hedging transaction exposure in other currencies than AUD. The Group has bought currencies to a nominal amount of 389 (290) and sold currencies to a nominal amount of 399 (285). These nominal amounts have been translated to SEK from the original currency with the year-end exchange rate. In the table below, fair value for all outstanding derivative instruments related to transaction exposure is shown.
| Outstanding derivative instruments related to transaction exposure |
2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Foreign exchange forwards | Fair value | Fair value |
| Assets | 32 | 7 |
| Liabilities | 4 | 49 |
The Group also has a MUSD 700 forward contract to hedge an intercompany loan. At December 31, the fair value of the forward contract of –351 (–325) was accounted for through other comprehensive income. The cash flows related to the repayment of the loan and the maturity of the forward contract will occur in 2013.
The largest operational surplus and deficit currencies are shown in Graph 1. The amounts presented in Graph 1 represent the estimate of the net amounts the Group has to exchange in different currencies. The estimates are based on the Group's intercompany payments and on payment flows from customers and to suppliers in the most significant currencies. The operational transaction exposure in MSEK is 14 054 (14 986) and is calculated as the net operational exposed flows.
Graph 1: Estimated operational transaction exposure in the Group´s most important currencies 2012 and 2011
AUD CAD CNY EUR GBP HKD INR NOK PLN USD ZAR BRL RUB SEK Other
27. Continued –15 000 AUD CAD CNY EUR GBP HKD INR NOK PLN USD ZAR BRL RUB SEK Other
The following table illustrates the effect that one percentage point weakening or strengthening of the SEK against all other currencies would have on the transaction exposure.
| Transaction exposure sensitivity | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Currency rate +1% | –133 | –131 |
| Currency rate –1% | 133 | 130 |
Graph 2 illustrates the effect on the Group pre-tax earnings of one-sided fluctuations in USD and EUR exchange rates if no hedging transactions have been undertaken, and before any impact of offsetting price adjustments or similar measures. The graph indicates e.g. that the Group's pretax earnings of estimated net USD flows would decrease by approximately 420 (400) if the USD would weaken by 5%.
Graph 2 Operational transaction exposure effect of EUR and USD before hedging
Translation exposure
Group currency risk policy
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Translation exposure risk is the risk that the value of the Group's net investments in foreign currencies is negatively affected by changes in exchange rates. The Group's worldwide presence creates a currency effect since the financial statements of entities with functional currencies other than SEK are translated to SEK when preparing the consolidated financial statements. The exposure is the net of assets and liabilities denominated in the specific currency. The effect of currency rate fluctuation on these net positions is the translation effect.
–150 –100 The following describes the Group's general policies for managing translation exposure:
- –250 • Translation exposure should be reduced by matching assets and liabilities in the same currencies.
- –350 • The FRMC may decide to hedge part or all of the remaining translation exposure. Any hedge of translation exposure shall qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with IFRS.
Status at year-end
The Group uses loans and derivatives to reduce the translation exposure on net investments in USD and EUR in the consolidated financial statements and to reduce the exchange rate risk related to net assets in subsidiaries. These instruments are designated as net investment hedges in the consolidated financial statements.
The Group has a cross currency swap to convert an underlying MUSD 800 loan to a EUR liability. Including the MUSD 800 loan converted to EUR, the external loans used to hedge EUR-denominated net assets amount to MEUR 2 080 (1 473). As of December 31, the change in fair value of the EUR-denominated hedging instruments was –98 (290), of which the currency effect was 554 (685). The Group also uses loans totaling MUSD 58 (58) to hedge the corresponding net assets in USD. The fair value of the USD-denominated hedging instruments as of December 31, 2012 was –72 (–111).
| Outstanding derivative | 2012 | 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| instruments related to translation exposure |
Fair value | Nominal amount |
Fair value | Nominal amount |
| Cross currency swap | ||||
| Assets | – | MSE K 467 MUS |
D 800 | |
| Liabilities | MSE K 389 MUS |
D 800 | – | – |
The Group's loan portfolio is also exposed to movement in currency rates. Although the impact on the net income would be very limited as substantially all of the Group's loans are designated as hedges of net investments and the effect is accounted for in other comprehensive income (see also note 1, Accounting principles, Financial assets and liabilities).
Graph 3 indicates the Group's sensitivity to currency translation effects when earnings of foreign subsidiaries are translated. The graph indicates e.g. that the translation effect on the Group's pretax earnings would be 135 (135) if SEK strengthen by 1%. A SEK weakening by 1% would affect the the Group's pretax earnings by –135 (–135).
Graph 3
Translation effect on earnings before tax
Change in exchange rate SEK, % 3 4 5
Credit risk
Credit risk can be divided into operational and financial credit risk. These risks are described further in the following sections. The table below shows the total exposure related to financial assets as at December 31.
| Change in profit, MSEK Credit risk |
2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables | ||
| – trade receivables | 15 998 | 16 877 |
| – finance lease receivables | 932 | 1 063 |
| – other financial receivables | 1 860 | 2 250 |
| – other receivables | 1 870 | 2 115 |
| – accrued income | 1 336 | 1 005 |
| –5 –4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4 5 % – cash and cash equivalents |
12 416 | 5 716 |
| USD % change against Held to maturity investments all other currencies EUR |
200 | 278 |
| Available-for-sale assets | 2 | 3 |
| Derivatives | 458 | 791 |
| 35 072 | 30 098 |
Operational credit risk
Group credit risk policy
Operational credit risk is the risk that the Group's customers will not meet their payment obligations. The Group's operational credit risk policy is that business areas, divisions and individual business units are responsible for the commercial risks arising from their operations. The operational credit risk is measured as the net aggregate value of receivables on a customer.
Status at year end
Since the Group's sales are dispersed among thousands of customers, of which no single customer represents a significant share of the Group's commercial risk, the monitoring of commercial credit risks is primarily done at the business area, divisional or business unit level. Each business unit is required to have an approved commercial risk policy.
The Group has an in-house customer finance operation (Atlas Copco Customer Finance) as a means of supporting equipment sales. At December 31, the credit portfolio of their customer finance operations totaled approximately 2 672 (3 233) consisting of 83 (127) reported as trade receivables, 917 (1 062) reported as financial lease receivables, and 1 672 (2 044) reported as other financial receivables. In addition, Atlas Copco Customer Finance also has non-cancelable operating lease contracts of 317 (682). There were no significant concentrations of customer risks in these operations. No customer represented more than 5% of the total outstanding receivables. For further information, see note 22.
Atlas Copco Customer Finance maintains collateral for its credit portfolio primarily through repossession rights in equipment. Business units may also, partly, transfer the commercial risk insurance to external entities (normally to an export credit agency).
Provision for impairment of credit risks
The business units establish provisions for impairment that represent their estimate of incurred losses in respect of trade and other receivables. The main components of this provision are specific loss provisions corresponding to individually significant exposures and a collective loss component established for groups of similar assets in respect of losses that have not yet been identified. The collective loss provision is determined based on historical data of default statistics for similar financial assets. At year-end 2012, the provision for bad debt amounted to 4.6% (4.0) of gross total customer receivables. The following table presents the gross value of trade receivables by ageing category together with the related impairment provisions.
| 2012 | 2011 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | Gross Impairment | Gross | Impairment | |
| Not past due | 11 057 | 15 | 12 207 | 20 |
| Past due but not impaired |
||||
| 0–30 days | 2 617 | – | 2 697 | – |
| 31–60 days | 831 | – | 824 | – |
| 61–90 days | 432 | – | 386 | – |
| More than 90 days | 1 288 | – | 1 057 | – |
| Past due and individually impaired |
||||
| 0–30 days | 120 | 2 | 84 | 4 |
| 31–60 days | 37 | 3 | 37 | 4 |
| 61–90 days | 22 | 3 | 17 | 7 |
| More than 90 days | 361 | 267 | 273 | 239 |
| Collective impairment | – | 477 | – | 431 |
| 16 765 | 767 | 17 582 | 705 |
The total estimated fair value of collateral for trade receivables amounted to 692 (735). Approximately 50% of collateral consisted of repossession rights and 50% of export credit insurance. Based on historical default statistics and the diversified customer base, the credit risk is assessed to be limited.
The gross amount of finance lease receivables amounted to 944 (1 075), of which 12 (12) have been impaired and the gross amount of other financial receivables amounted to 1 908 (2 299), of which 48 (49) have been impaired. There are no significant amounts past due that are not impaired. The total estimated fair value of collateral to finance lease receivables and other finance receivables was 485 (680) and 1 091 (1 635), respectively, consisting primarily of repossession rights.
Financial credit risk
Group credit risk policy
Credit risk on financial transactions is the risk that the Group incurs losses as a result of non-payment by counterparts related to the Group's investments, bank deposits or derivative transactions. The financial credit risk is measured differently depending on the transaction type.
Investment transactions
Efficient cash management systems should be maintained in order to minimize excess cash in operations where it cannot be invested or used to reduce interest-bearing debt. Cash may only be invested if at least one of the credit ratings (as rated by Standard & Poor's or Moody's) of the approved counterpart or underlying investment is at least A-/A3 in case of financial counterparties, funds or sovereigns and BBB-/Baa3 in case of non-financial counterparties. Investments in structured financial derivatives are not allowed even if they meet the rating criteria, unless approved by the FRMC. Other criteria which are considered when investing include limiting the exposure with any single counterparty, the tenor, and liquidity of the investment. A list of approved counterparts with a maximum exposure limit for each counterpart is maintained and monitored.
Derivative transactions
As part of the Group's management of financial risks, the Group enters into derivative transactions with financial counterparts. Such transactions may only be undertaken with approved counterparts for which credit limits have been established and with which ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association) master agreements are in force. Derivative transactions may only be entered into by Group Treasury or in rare cases by another entity, but only after the approval of Group Treasurer. Atlas Copco primarily uses derivatives as hedging instruments and the policy allows only standardized (as opposed to structured) derivatives.
Status at year-end
During 2012 Atlas Copco has entered into CSA agreements (Credit Support Annex) with most of the Group's main banking partners in order to reduce credit risks in derivative transactions.
At year-end 2012, the measured credit risk on derivatives, taking into account the nominal value of the transaction, a time add-on, and the market value (if positive for Atlas Copco), amounted to 400 (796).
The table below presents the Group's total holdings in derivatives.
| Outstanding derivative instruments related to | ||
|---|---|---|
| financial exposures | 2012 | 2011 |
| Cross currency swaps | ||
| Assets | – | 467 |
| Liabilities | 389 | – |
| Interest rate swaps | ||
| Assets | 258 | 283 |
| Liabilities | 84 | 10 |
| Foreign exchange forwards | ||
| Assets | 168 | 34 |
| Liabilities | 387 | 536 |
| Outstanding derivative instruments related to | ||
| operational exposures | 2012 | 2011 |
| Assets | 32 | 7 |
| Liabilities | 4 | 49 |
Other market and price risks
Commodity-price risk is the risk that the cost of direct and indirect materials could increase as underlying commodity prices rise in global markets. The Group is directly and indirectly exposed to raw material price fluctuations. Cost increases for raw materials and components often coincide with strong end-customer demand and are offset by increased sales to mining customers and compensated for by increased market prices. Therefore, the Group does not hedge commodity-price risks.
Fair value of financial instruments
In Atlas Copco's balance sheet, financial instruments are carried at fair value or at amortized cost. According to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, fair value is established according to a fair value hierarchy consisting of three levels. These levels should reflect the extent to which fair value is based on observable market data or own assumptions. Below is a description of each level in the fair value hierarchy and also valuation methods used for each financial instrument.
Fair value hierarchy
Fair values are based on observable market prices or, in the case that such prices are not available, on observable inputs or other valuation techniques. Amounts shown in other notes are unrealized and will not necessarily be realized.
Level 1
Level 1 comprises financial instruments for which fair value is based on quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. A market is considered as active if quoted prices from an exchange, broker, industry group, pricing service, or supervisory body are readily and regularly available and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions at arm's length. For Atlas Copco, cash and cash equivalent are carried as level 1.
Level 2
Level 2 comprises financial instruments for which fair value is based on models that utilize observable data for the asset or liability other than the quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). Example of observable data is data that can serve as a basis for assessing prices, such as market interest rates and yield curves. Level 2 mainly includes certificates and non-standard derivative instruments (such as interest rate and currency swaps) that are not traded in an active market. For Atlas Copco, all derivatives are carried as level 2 instruments.
Level 3
Level 3 comprises financial instruments for which fair value is based on a valuation model, whereby significant input is based on unobservable market data. The Group has no instruments categorized as level 3.
Valuation methods
Derivatives
Fair values of forward exchange contracts are calculated based on prevailing markets. Interest rate swaps are valued based on market rates and present value of future cash flows.
Interest-bearing liabilities
Fair values are calculated based on market rates and present value of future cash flows.
Finance leases and other financial receivables
Fair values are calculated based on market rates for similar contracts and present value of future cash flows.
The Group´s financial instruments by category
The carrying value for the Group's financial instruments corresponds to fair value in all categories except for borrowings. See note 21 for additional information.
| Currency rates used in the financial statements | Year-end rate | Average rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Code | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |
| Australia | 1 | AUD | 6.78 | 7.01 | 6.99 | 6.72 |
| Canada | 1 | CAD | 6.56 | 6.77 | 6.74 | 6.55 |
| EU | 1 | EUR | 8.61 | 8.94 | 8.71 | 9.02 |
| Hong Kong | 100 | HKD | 84.25 | 88.92 | 86.84 | 83.30 |
| United Kingdom | 1 | GBP | 10.51 | 10.66 | 10.70 | 10.37 |
| U.S.A. | 1 | USD | 6.53 | 6.91 | 6.74 | 6.48 |
Relationships
The Group has related party relationships with the Company's largest shareholder, its associates and with its Board members and Group Management. The Company's largest shareholder, the Investor Group, controls approximately 22% of the voting rights in Atlas Copco.
The subsidiaries that are directly owned by the Parent Company are presented in note A21 to the financial statements of the Parent Company. Holding companies and operating subsidiaries are listed in note A22. Information about associated companies is found in note 14. Information about Board members and Group Management is presented on pages 60–63.
Transactions and outstanding balances
The Group has not had any transactions with Investor during the year, other than dividends declared, and has no outstanding balances with Investor.
The Investor Group has controlling or significant influence in companies which Atlas Copco may have transactions within the normal course of business. Any such transactions are made on commercial terms.
Transactions with associated companies
The Group sold various products and purchased goods through certain associated companies on terms generally similar to those prevailing with unrelated parties.
The following table summarizes the Group's related party transactions with its associates:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenues | 74 | 16 |
| Goods purchased | 30 | 67 |
| Services purchased | 30 | 29 |
| At Dec. 31: | ||
| Trade receivables | 2 | 13 |
| Trade payables | 7 | 7 |
| Other liabilities | – | 2 |
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | 8 | 9 |
| Guarantees | 10 | 10 |
Compensation to key management personnel
Compensation to the Board and to Group Management is disclosed in note 5.
On February 28, 2013, Atlas Copco issued within its EMTN program a 10-year MEUR 500 bond with a coupon of 2.5%. No other events have occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date which require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the financial statements.
Financial statements, Parent Company
Income statement
| For the year ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Note | 2012 | 2011 |
| Administrative expenses | A2 | –453 | –392 |
| Other operating income | A3 | 218 | 181 |
| Other operating expenses | A3 | –1 | –8 |
| Operating loss | –236 | –219 | |
| Financial income | A4 | 1 375 | 6 043 |
| Financial expenses | A4 | –1 907 | –2 407 |
| Profit after financial items | –768 | 3 417 | |
| Appropriations | A5 | 4 728 | 5 737 |
| Profit before tax | 3 960 | 9 154 | |
| Income tax | A5, A6 | –936 | –946 |
| Profit for the year | 3 024 | 8 208 |
Statement of comprehensive income
| For the year ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Note | 2012 | 2011 |
| Profit for the year | 3 024 | 8 208 | |
| Other comprehensive income | |||
| Translation of net investment | 872 | 152 | |
| Other comprehensive income of the year, net of tax |
872 | 152 | |
| Total comprehensive income for the year |
3 896 | 8 360 |
Balance sheet
| As at December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | Note | 2012 | 2011 |
| ASSETS | |||
| Non-current assets | |||
| Intangible assets | A7 | 20 | 24 |
| Tangible assets | A8 | 38 | 46 |
| Financial assets | |||
| Shares in Group companies | A10, A21 | 92 903 | 91 298 |
| Other financial assets | A11 | 398 | 822 |
| Total non-current assets | 93 359 | 92 190 | |
| Current assets | |||
| Other receivables | A12 | 7 803 | 9 237 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | A13 | 7 579 | 2 788 |
| Total current assets | 15 382 | 12 025 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 108 741 | 104 215 | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Restricted equity | |||
| Share capital | 786 | 786 | |
| Legal reserve | 4 999 | 4 999 | |
| Total restricted equity | 5 785 | 5 785 | |
| Non-restricted equity | |||
| Reserve for fair value | 2 688 | 1 816 | |
| Retained earnings | 29 740 | 27 486 | |
| Profit for the year | 3 024 | 8 208 | |
| Total non-restricted equity | 35 452 | 37 510 | |
| TOTAL EQUITY | 41 237 | 43 295 | |
| Untaxed reserves | A5 | 1 255 | – |
| PROVISIONS | |||
| Post-employment benefits | A15 | 75 | 74 |
| Other provisions | A16 | 307 | 274 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | A9 | 674 | 629 |
| Total provisions | 1 056 | 977 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | A17 | 48 863 | 49 557 |
| Other liabilities | 82 | 21 | |
| Total non-current liabilities | 48 945 | 49 578 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | A17 | 14 622 | 8 343 |
| Income tax liabilities | 140 | 894 | |
| Other liabilities | A18 | 1 486 | 1 128 |
| Total current liabilities | 16 248 | 10 365 | |
| TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | 108 741 | 104 215 | |
| Assets pledged | A20 | 94 | 55 |
Statement of changes in equity
| Reserve for | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares |
Share | Legal | fair value – translation |
Retained | ||
| MSEK unless otherwise stated | outstanding | capital | reserve | reserve | earnings | Total |
| Opening balance, Jan. 1, 2012 | 1 211 614 028 | 786 | 4 999 | 1 816 | 35 694 | 43 295 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 872 | 3 024 | 3 896 | |||
| Dividends | –6 069 | –6 069 | ||||
| Acquisition series A shares | –2 751 525 | –477 | –477 | |||
| Divestment series A shares | 4 066 506 | 676 | 676 | |||
| Divestment series B shares | 493 166 | 72 | 72 | |||
| Share-based payment, equity settled | ||||||
| – expense during the year | 50 | 50 | ||||
| – exercise of options | –206 | –206 | ||||
| Closing balance, Dec. 31, 2012 | 1 213 422 175 | 786 | 4 999 | 2 688 | 32 764 | 41 237 |
| Opening balance, Jan. 1, 2011 | 1 218 376 231 | 786 | 4 999 | 1 664 | 39 458 | 46 907 |
| Total comprehensive income for the year | 152 | 8 208 | 8 360 | |||
| Dividends* | –4 851 | –4 851 | ||||
| Redemption of shares | –393 | –5 674 | –6 067 | |||
| Increase of share capital through bonus issue | 393 | –393 | – | |||
| Acquisition series A shares | –9 169 360 | –1 368 | –1 368 | |||
| Divestment series A shares | 2 006 570 | 309 | 309 | |||
| Divestment series B shares | 400 587 | 54 | 54 | |||
| Share-based payment, equity settled | ||||||
| – expense during the year | 34 | 34 | ||||
| – exercise of options | –83 | –83 | ||||
| Closing balance, Dec. 31, 2011 | 1 211 614 028 | 786 | 4 999 | 1 816 | 35 694 | 43 295 |
* Net of dividend repaid of 1.
See note A14 for additional information.
Statement of cash flows
| For the year ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | 2012 | 2011 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | ||
| Operating loss | –236 | –219 |
| Adjustments for: | ||
| Depreciation | 13 | 7 |
| Capital gain/loss and other non-cash items | 949 | –139 |
| Operating cash deficit | 726 | –351 |
| Net financial items received/paid | –130 | 3 945 |
| Group contributions received/paid | 4 314 | 3 538 |
| Taxes paid | –1 742 | –9 |
| Cash flow before change in working capital | 3 168 | 7 123 |
| Change in | ||
| Operating receivables | 1 770 | –360 |
| Operating liabilities | 289 | –204 |
| Change in working capital | 2 059 | –564 |
| Net cash from operating activities | 5 227 | 6 559 |
| For the year ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| Amounts in MSEK | 2012 | 2011 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | ||
| Investments in tangible assets | –1 | –30 |
| Investments in subsidiaries | –1 625 | –1 216 |
| Divestment of subsidiaries/repatriation of equity | – | – |
| Investments in financial assets | 396 | 237 |
| Net cash from investing activities | –1 230 | –1 009 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | ||
| Dividends paid | –6 069 | –4 851 |
| Redemption of shares | – | –6 067 |
| Repurchase and divestment of own shares | 271 | –1 005 |
| Change in interest-bearing liabilities | 6 592 | –1 652 |
| Net cash from financing activities | 794 | –13 575 |
| Net cash flow for the year | 4 791 | –8 025 |
| Cash and cash equivalents, Jan. 1 | 2 788 | 10 813 |
| Net cash flow for the year | 4 791 | –8 025 |
| Cash and cash equivalents, Dec. 31 | 7 579 | 2 788 |
Notes to the Parent Company financial statements
MSEK unless otherwise stated
A1. Significant accounting principles
Atlas Copco AB is the ultimate Parent Company of the Atlas Copco Group and is headquartered in Nacka, Sweden. Its operations include administrative functions, holding company functions as well as part of Group Treasury.
The financial statements of Atlas Copco AB have been prepared in accordance with the Swedish Annual Accounts Act and the recommendation RFR 2, "Accounting for Legal Entities", hereafter referred to as "RFR 2", issued by the Swedish Financial Reporting Board. In accordance with RFR 2, parent companies that issue consolidated financial statements according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as endorsed by the European Union, shall present their financial statements in accordance with IFRS, to the extent these accounting principles comply with the Swedish Annual Accounts Act and may use exemptions from IFRS provided by RFR 2 due to Swedish tax legislation.
The financial statements are presented in Swedish kronor (SEK), rounded to the nearest million. The parent company's accounting principles have been consistently applied to all periods presented unless otherwise stated. The financial statements are prepared using the same accounting principles as described in note 1 to the Group's consolidated financial statements, except for those disclosed in the following sections.
For discussion regarding accounting estimates and judgments, see page 77.
Changes in accounting principles
The Parent Company has applied the amendments to RFR 2 regarding group contributions in advance of the effective date (annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013). Under the amendments the principal rule is that group contributions to a parent company should be recognized as financial income. Group contributions from a parent company should be recognized as an increase of shares in group companies. Under the alternative rule group contributions should be recognized as appropriations in the income statement.
The Parent Company has chosen to apply the alternative rule with retrospective effect.
Subsidiaries
Participations in subsidiaries are accounted for by the Parent Company at historical cost. The carrying amounts of participations in subsidiaries are reviewed for impairment in accordance with IAS 36, Impairment of Assets. See the Group's accounting policies, Impairment of financial assets, for further details.
Transaction costs incurred in connection with a business combination are by the Parent Company accounted for as part of the acquisition costs and are not expensed.
Lease contracts
All lease contracts entered into by the Parent Company are accounted for as operating leases.
Employee benefits
Defined benefit plans
Defined benefit plans are not accounted for in accordance with IAS 19, but are accounted for according to Swedish GAAP which are based on the Swedish law regarding pensions, "Tryggandelagen" and regulations issued by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority. The primary differences as compared to IAS 19 is the way discount rates are fixed, that the calculation of defined benefit obligations is based on current salary levels, without consideration of future salary increases and that all actuarial gains and losses are included in profit or loss as they occur.
Share-based payments
The share-based payments that the Parent Company has granted to employees in the Parent Company are accounted for using the same principle as described in note 1 in the consolidated financial statements.
The share-based payments that the Parent Company has granted to employees in subsidiaries are not accounted for as an employee expense in the Parent Company, but as an increase of Shares in Group companies. This increase is accrued over the same period as in the Group and with a corresponding increase in Equity for equity-settled programs and as an increase in liabilities for cash-settled programs.
Financial guarantees
Financial guarantees issued by the Parent Company for the benefit of subsidiaries are not valued at fair value. They are reported as contingent liabilities, unless it becomes probable that the guarantees will lead to payments. In such case, provisions will be recorded.
Hedge accounting
External interest-bearing liabilities denominated in other currencies than SEK, used to hedge currency exposure from investments in shares of foreign subsidiaries are not remeasured according to exchange rates prevailing on the date of the balance sheet, but measured based on the exchange rate the day that the hedging relation was established.
Derivatives used to hedge investments in shares in foreign subsidiaries are recognized at fair value and changes therein are recognized in profit or loss. The corresponding fair value change on shares in subsidiaries is recognized in profit or loss.
Group and shareholder's contributions
In Sweden, Group contributions are deductible for tax purposes but shareholder's contributions are not. Group contributions are recognized as appropriations in the income statement.
A2. Employees and personnel expenses and remunerations to auditors
| Average number of employees | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||
| Women | Men | Total | Women | Men | Total | |
| Sweden | 61 | 48 | 109 | 58 | 48 | 106 |
Women in Atlas Copco Board and Management, %
| Dec. 31, 2012 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Board of Directors excl. union representatives | 33 | 33 |
| Group Management | 22 | 221) |
| 1) Average 24% |
| Salaries and other remuneration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |||
| Board members and Group Manage ment 1) |
Other employees |
Board members and Group Manage ment 1) |
Other employees |
|
| Sweden | 58 | 101 | 44 | 77 |
| of which variable compensation |
12 | 12 |
1) Includes 8 (9) Board members who receive fees from Atlas Copco AB as well as the President and CEO and 6 (7) members of Group Management who are employed by and receive salary and other remuneration from the Company.
For information regarding remuneration and other fees for members of the Board, the President and CEO, and other members of the Group Management, see note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.
| Pension benefits and other social costs | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Contractual pension benefits for Board members and Group Management |
8 | 9 |
| Contractual pension benefits for other employees |
22 | 16 |
| Other social costs | 69 | 49 |
| 99 | 74 | |
| Capitalized pension obligations to Board members and Group Management |
14 | 15 |
Remunerations to auditors
Audit fees and consultancy fees for advice or assistance other than audit, were as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Deloitte | ||
| – audit fee | 7 | 6 |
| – other | 1 | 3 |
| 8 | 9 |
At the Annual General Meeting in 2010, Deloitte was elected as auditor for the Parent Company for a four year period.
Other fees are primarily consultancy for tax and accounting matters.
A3. Other operating income and expenses
| 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|
| 218 | 181 |
| 218 | 181 |
| –1 | –8 |
| –1 | –8 |
A4. Financial income and expenses
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Interest income | ||
| – cash and cash equivalents | 87 | 158 |
| – Group Companies | 237 | 212 |
| Dividend income from Group Companies | 1 004 | 5 640 |
| Change in fair value – other assets | – | 2 |
| Foreign exchange gain, net | 47 | 31 |
| Financial income | 1 375 | 6 043 |
| Interest expense | ||
| – borrowings | –660 | –606 |
| – derivatives for fair value hedges | –174 | –126 |
| – Group Companies | –1 013 | –1 665 |
| – pension provisions, net | –1 | –1 |
| Change in fair value – other liabilities and borrowings | –59 | –9 |
| Financial expenses | –1 907 | –2 407 |
| Financial expenses, net | –532 | 3 636 |
The decrease in net financial income and expenses is primarily due to lower dividend income from Group Companies.
In accordance with RFR 2 the parent company has in 2012 changed its accounting principle, with retrospective application, for received group contribution from being recognized as a financial item to being recognized as an appropriation. Comparable figures for 2011 have been adjusted accordingly.
The above financial income and expenses include the following in respect of assets and liabilities not at fair value through profit or loss:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total interest income on financial assets | 324 | 370 |
| Total interest expense on financial liabilities | –1 674 | –2 272 |
The following table presents the net gain or loss by financial instrument category:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Net gain/loss on | ||
| – loans and receivables, incl bank deposits | 371 | 403 |
| – other liabilities | –1 733 | –2 281 |
| – fair value hedge | –174 | –126 |
| Profit from shares in Group companies | 1 004 | 5 640 |
| –532 | 3 636 |
For further information about the hedges, see note 27 of the consolidated financial statements.
A5. Appropriations
| Untaxed provisions | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Allocation to accrual fund | 1 255 | – |
| Appropriations | ||
| Group contributions paid | –167 | –268 |
| Group contributions received | 6 150 | 6 005 |
| Allocation to accrual fund Tax 2013 | –1 255 | – |
| 4 728 | 5 737 |
A6. Income tax
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Current tax | –1 001 | –971 |
| Deferred tax | 65 | 25 |
| –936 | –946 | |
| Profit before taxes | 3 960 | 9 154 |
| The Swedish corporate tax rate, % | 26.3 | 26.3 |
| National tax based on profit before taxes | –1 041 | –2 408 |
| Tax effects of: | ||
| Non-deductible expenses | –3 | –7 |
| Tax exempt income | 265 | 1 483 |
| Deductible expenses, not recognized in Income statement |
–176 | 28 |
| Prior year adjustment, deferred tax | 88 | 7 |
| Change in tax rate, deferred tax | –17 | – |
| Controlled Foreign Company taxation | –54 | –42 |
| Adjustments from prior years | 2 | –7 |
| –936 | –946 | |
| Effective tax in % | 23.6 | 10.3 |
The Parent Company's effective tax rate of 23.6% (10.3) is primarily affected by non-taxable dividends and one adjustment of deferred tax prior year.
A7. Intangible assets
| Capitalized expenditures for computer programs |
||
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 | |
| Accumulated cost | ||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 36 | 36 |
| Investments | 0 | 0 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 36 | 36 |
| Accumulated depreciation | ||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 12 | 7 |
| Depreciation for the year | 4 | 5 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 16 | 12 |
| Carrying amount | ||
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 20 | 24 |
| Opening balance, Jan 1 | 24 | 29 |
A8. Tangible assets
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buildings and land |
Machinery and equipment |
Construction in progress |
Total | Buildings and land |
Machinery and equipment |
Construction in progress |
Total | |
| Accumulated cost | ||||||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 23 | 38 | – | 61 | 4 | 22 | 24 | 50 |
| Investments | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | 17 | 13 | 30 |
| Reclassifications | – | – | – | – | 23 | 8 | –31 | – |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | –4 | –9 | –6 | –19 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 23 | 39 | – | 62 | 23 | 38 | – | 61 |
| Accumulated depreciation | ||||||||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 1 | 14 | – | 15 | 4 | 15 | – | 19 |
| Depreciation for the year | 2 | 7 | – | 9 | 1 | 1 | – | 2 |
| Disposals | – | – | – | – | –4 | –2 | – | –6 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 3 | 21 | – | 24 | 1 | 14 | – | 15 |
| Carrying amount | ||||||||
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 20 | 18 | – | 38 | 22 | 24 | – | 46 |
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 22 | 24 | – | 46 | – | 7 | 24 | 31 |
The asset Buildings and land relates to improvements in leased properties. Depreciation is accounted for under administrative expenses in the Income Statement.
The leasing costs for assets under operating leases, such as rented premises, cars and office equipment are reported among administrative expenses and amounted to 29 (25). Future payments for non-cancelable leasing contracts amounted to 251 (269) and fall due as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Less than one year | 30 | 29 |
| Between one and five years | 118 | 113 |
| More than five years | 103 | 127 |
| 251 | 269 |
A9. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
| 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Liabi lities |
Net balance |
Assets | Liabi lities |
Net balance |
|
| Fixed assets | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | – | 0 |
| Post employment benefits |
16 | – | 16 | 19 | – | 19 |
| Other provisions |
14 | – | 14 | 16 | – | 16 |
| Non-current liabilities |
– | –704 | –704 | – | –664 | –664 |
| 30 | –704 | –674 | 35 | –664 | –629 |
The following reconciles the net balance of deferred taxes at the beginning of the year to that at the end of the year:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Net balance, Jan. 1 | –629 | –600 |
| Charges to other comprehensive income | –110 | –54 |
| Charges to profit for the year | 65 | 25 |
| Net balance, Dec. 31 | –674 | –629 |
A10. Shares in Group Companies
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accumulated cost | ||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 91 822 | 90 634 |
| Investments | 1 263 | 991 |
| Net investment hedge | –186 | –40 |
| Shareholder's contribution | 528 | 237 |
| Disposals | – | – |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 93 427 | 91 822 |
| Accumulated write-up | ||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 600 | 600 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 600 | 600 |
| Accumulated write-down | ||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | –1 124 | –1 124 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | –1 124 | –1 124 |
| 92 903 | 91 298 |
For further information about Group Companies, see note A21.
A11. Other financial assets
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from Group Companies | 20 | 417 |
| Derivatives | ||
| – not designated for hedge accounting | 1 | 3 |
| – designated for hedge accounting | 257 | 281 |
| Endowment insurances | 56 | 55 |
| Financial assets classified as loans and receivables | ||
| – other financial receivables | 64 | 66 |
| 398 | 822 |
Endowment insurances relate to defined contribution pension plans and are pledged to the pension beneficiary (see note A15 and A20).
A12. Other receivables
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables from Group Companies | 7 495 | 8 582 |
| Derivatives | ||
| – not designated for hedge accounting | 180 | 40 |
| – designated for hedge accounting | 20 | 467 |
| Financial assets classified as loans and receivables | ||
| – other receivables | 36 | 91 |
| Prepaid expenses and accrued income | 72 | 57 |
| 7 803 | 9 237 |
A13. Cash and cash equivalents
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents classified as loans and receivables |
||
| – cash | 1 937 | 202 |
| – cash equivalents | 5 642 | 2 586 |
| 7 579 | 2 788 |
The committed, but unutilized, credit facilities equaled 6 390 (15 757).
A14. Equity
For information on share transactions and mandates approved by the Annual General Meeting, see note 20 in the consolidated financial statements.
Reserves
The Parent Company's equity includes certain reserves which are described as follows:
Legal reserve
The legal reserve is a part of the restricted equity and is not available for distribution.
Reserve for fair value –Translation reserve
The reserve comprises translation of intragroup receivables from or liabilities to foreign operations that in substance are part of the net investment in the foreign operations.
A15. Post-employment benefits
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defined contribution pension plan |
Defined benefit pension plan |
Total | Defined contribution pension plan |
Defined benefit pension plan |
Total | |||
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 55 | 19 | 74 | 52 | 24 | 76 | ||
| Provision made | 1 | – | 1 | 3 | – | 3 | ||
| Provision used | – | – | – | – | –5 | –5 | ||
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 56 | 19 | 75 | 55 | 19 | 74 |
The Parent Company has endowment insurances of 56 (55) relating to defined contribution pension plans. The insurances are recognized as other financial assets, and pledged to the pension beneficiary.
Description of defined benefit pension plans
The Parent Company has three defined benefit pension plans. The ITP plan is a final salary pension plan covering the majority of salaried employees in Atlas Copco AB which benefits are secured through the Atlas Copco pension trust. The second plan relates to a group of employees earning more than 10 income base amounts who have opted out from the ITP plan. This plan is insured. The third plan relates to retired former senior employees. These pension arrangements are provided for.
| 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funded pension |
Unfunded pension |
Total | Funded pension |
Unfunded pension |
Total | |
| Defined benefit obligations | 131 | 19 | 150 | 133 | 19 | 152 |
| Fair value of plan assets | –221 | – | –221 | –208 | – | –208 |
| Present value of net obligations | –90 | 19 | –71 | –75 | 19 | –56 |
| Not recognized surplus | 90 | – | 90 | 75 | – | 75 |
| Net amount recognized in balance sheet | – | 19 | 19 | – | 19 | 19 |
| Reconciliation of defined benefit obligations | Funded pension |
Unfunded pension |
Total | Funded pension |
Unfunded pension |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defined benefit obligations at Jan. 1 | 133 | 19 | 152 | 127 | 24 | 151 |
| Service cost | 5 | 2 | 7 | 4 | – | 4 |
| Interest expense | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Other changes in obligations | –1 | – | –1 | 9 | – | 9 |
| Benefits paid from plan | –10 | –3 | –13 | –11 | –6 | –17 |
| Defined benefit obligations at Dec. 31 | 131 | 19 | 150 | 133 | 19 | 152 |
| Reconciliation of plan assets | Funded pension |
Unfunded pension |
Total | Funded pension |
Unfunded pension |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1 | 208 | – | 208 | 202 | – | 202 |
| Return on plan assets | 13 | – | 13 | 6 | – | 6 |
| Payments | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31 | 221 | – | 221 | 208 | – | 208 |
A15. Continued
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Pension commitments provided for in the balance sheet |
||
| Costs excluding interest | 13 | 9 |
| Interest expense | 1 | 1 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| Pension commitments provided for through insurance contracts |
||
| Service cost | 17 | 15 |
| 17 | 15 | |
| Reimbursement from the Atlas Copco pension trust |
– | – |
| – | – | |
| Net cost for pensions, excluding taxes | 31 | 25 |
| Special employer´s contribution | 7 | 7 |
| Credit insurance costs | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | 32 |
Pension expenses for the year included within administrative expenses amounted to 30 (25) of which the Board members and Group Management 8 (9) and others 22 (16).
The Parent Company's share in plan assets fair value in the Atlas Copco pension trust amounts to 221 (208) and is allocated as follows:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity securities | 30 | 33 |
| Bonds | 140 | 145 |
| Real estate | 30 | 27 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 21 | 3 |
| 221 | 208 |
The plan assets of the Atlas Copco pension trust are not included in the financial assets of the Parent Company.
The return on plan assets in the Atlas Copco pension trust amounted to 7.2% (3.1).
The Parent Company adheres to the actuarial assumptions used by The Swedish Pension Registration Institute (PRI) i.e. discount rate 3.8% (3.8).
The Parent Company estimates 13 will be paid to defined benefit pension plans during 2013.
A16. Other provisions
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening balance, Jan. 1 | 274 | 358 |
| During the year | ||
| – provisions made | 170 | – |
| – provisions used | –137 | –51 |
| – provisions reversed | – | –33 |
| Closing balance, Dec. 31 | 307 | 274 |
Other provisions include primarily provisions for costs related to employee option programs accounted for in accordance with IFRS 2 and UFR 7.
A17. Borrowings
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maturity | Repurchased nominal amount |
Carrying amount |
Fair value | Carrying amount |
Fair value | |
| Non-current | ||||||
| Medium Term Note Program MSEK 3 000 | 2012 | MSEK 505 | – | – | 2 540 | 2 557 |
| Medium Term Note Program MEUR 600 | 2014 | MEUR 260 | 3 416 | 3 173 | 5 814 | 6 046 |
| Medium Term Note Program MEUR 500 | 2019 | 4 458 | 4 731 | – | – | |
| Capital market borrowings MUSD 800 | 2017 | 5 860 | 6 604 | 6 273 | 7 086 | |
| Capital market borrowings MUSD 150 | 2019 | MUSD 7.5 | 973 | 1 358 | 973 | 1 453 |
| Bilateral borrowings EIB MEUR 213 | 2014 | 2 008 | 1 837 | 2 008 | 1 909 | |
| Bilateral borrowings EIB MEUR 275 | 2019 | 2 329 | 2 460 | – | – | |
| Bilateral borrowings NIB MEUR 100 | 2015 | 943 | 866 | 943 | 900 | |
| Bilateral borrowings NIB MSEK 705 | 2016 | 705 | 718 | 705 | 721 | |
| Non-current borrowings from Group Companies | 28 171 | 29 991 | 32 841 | 34 713 | ||
| Less current portion of long-term borrowings | – | – | –2 540 | –2 557 | ||
| Total non-current loans | 48 863 | 51 738 | 49 557 | 52 828 | ||
| Current | ||||||
| Current portion of long-term borrowings | – | – | 2 540 | 2 557 | ||
| Short term loans | 25 | 25 | 8 | 8 | ||
| Current borrowings from Group Companies | 14 597 | 14 606 | 5 795 | 5 795 | ||
| 14 622 | 14 631 | 8 343 | 8 360 | |||
| 63 485 | 66 369 | 57 900 | 61 188 | |||
| Whereof external loans | 20 717 | 21 772 | 19 264 | 20 680 |
The difference between carrying value and fair value is because certain liabilities are reported at their amortized cost, and not at fair value.
The following table shows the maturity structure of the Parent Company's loans and includes the effect of interest rate swaps.
| 2012 Maturity |
Fixed | Float | Carrying amount |
Fair value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | – | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| 2014 | 3 416 | 2 008 | 5 424 | 5 010 |
| 2015 | – | 943 | 943 | 866 |
| 2016 | – | 705 | 705 | 718 |
| 2017 | 4 395 | 1 465 | 5 860 | 6 604 |
| 2018 | – | – | – | – |
| 2019 | 7 760 | – | 7 760 | 8 549 |
| 15 571 | 5 146 | 20 717 | 21 772 |
A18. Other liabilities
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable | 18 | 30 |
| Liabilities to Group Companies | 341 | 120 |
| Derivatives | ||
| – not designated for hedge accounting | 40 | 221 |
| – designated for hedge accounting | 741 | 370 |
| Other financial liabilities | ||
| – other liabilities | 4 | 7 |
| Accrued expenses and prepaid income | 342 | 380 |
| 1 486 | 1 128 |
Accrued expenses and prepaid income include items such as social costs, vacation pay liability, and accrued interest.
A19. Financial exposure and principles for control of financial risks
Parent Company borrowings
Atlas Copco AB had MSEK 20 717 (19 264) of external borrowings and MSEK 42 768 (38 636) of internal borrowings at December 31, 2012. Derivative instruments are used to manage the currency and interest rate risk in line with policies set by the Financial Risk Management Committee, see note 27 in the consolidated financial statements.
Hedge accounting
The Parent Company hedges shares in subsidiaries through external loans of MEUR 1 428 (913) and MUSD 142 (142), and derivatives of MEUR 652 (565). The deferral hedge accounting of the external loans is based on a RFR 2 exemption. The derivatives are accounted as fair value hedges.
The interest rate risk is managed with interest rate swaps, designated as fair value hedges. Note 27 of the consolidated financial statements includes fair value of these swaps and further details.
Financial credit risk
Credit risk on financial transactions is the risk that the Parent Company incurs losses as a result of non-payment by counterparts related to the Parent Company's investments, bank deposits or derivative transactions. For further information regarding investment and derivative transactions, see Note 27 of the consolidated financial statements.
The table below shows the actual exposure of financial instruments as at December 31:
| Financial credit risk | 2012 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 7 579 | 2 788 |
| Receivables from Group companies | 7 515 | 8 999 |
| Derivatives | 458 | 791 |
| Other | 172 | 213 |
| 15 724 | 12 791 |
A19. Continued
Fair value hierarchy
Fair values are based on observable market prices or, in the case that such prices are not available, on observable inputs or other valuation techniques. Amounts shown in other notes are unrealized and will not necessarily be realized.
Level 1
Level 1 comprises financial instruments for which fair value is based on quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. A market is considered as active if quoted prices from an exchange, broker, industry group, pricing service, or supervisory body are readily and regularly available and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions at arm's length. For the Parent Company, cash and cash equivalent are carried as level 1.
Level 2
Level 2 comprises financial instruments for which fair value is based on models that utilize observable data for the asset or liability other than the quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices). Example of observable data is data that can serve as a basis for assessing prices, such as market interest rates and yield curves. Level 2 mainly includes certificates and non-standard derivative instruments (such as interest rate and currency swaps) that are not traded in an active market. For the Parent Company, all derivatives are carried as level 2 instruments.
Level 3
Level 3 comprises financial instruments for which fair value is based on a valuation model, whereby significant input is based on unobservable market data. The Parent Company has no instruments categorized as level 3.
Valuation methods
Derivatives
Fair values of forward exchange contracts are calculated based on prevailing markets. Interest rate swaps are valued based on market rates and present value of future cash flows.
Interest-bearing liabilities
Fair values are calculated based on market rates and present value of future cash flows.
The Parent Company's financial instruments by category
The carrying value for the Parent Company's financial instruments corresponds to fair value in all categories except for borrowings. See A17 for additional information.
A20. Assets pledged and contingent liabilities
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Assets pledged for pension commitments | ||
| Other receivables | 38 | – |
| Endowment insurances | 56 | 55 |
| 94 | 55 | |
| Contingent liabilities | ||
| Sureties and other contingent liabilities | ||
| – for external parties | 3 | 3 |
| – for Group companies | 365 | 407 |
| 368 | 410 |
Sureties and other contingent liabilities include bank and commercial guarantees as well as performance bonds.
A21. Directly owned subsidiaries
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares |
Percent held |
Carrying value |
Number of shares |
Percent held |
Carrying value |
|
| Directly owned product companies | ||||||
| Atlas Copco Airpower n.v., Wilrijk Atlas Copco Construction Tools AB, 556069-7228, Nacka |
76 415 60 000 |
100 100 |
45 826 116 |
76 415 60 000 |
100 100 |
45 807 118 |
| Atlas Copco Craelius AB, 556041-2149, Märsta | 200 000 | 100 | 44 | 200 000 | 100 | 37 |
| Atlas Copco MAI GmbH, Feistritz an der Drau | 1 | 100 | 129 | 1 | 100 | 129 |
| Atlas Copco Rock Drills AB, 556077-9018, Örebro | 1 000 000 | 100 | 426 | 1 000 000 | 100 | 405 |
| Atlas Copco Secoroc AB, 556001-9019, Fagersta | 2 325 000 | 100 | 169 | 2 325 000 | 100 | 159 |
| Atlas Copco GIA AB, 556040-0870, Grängesberg | 50 000 | 100 | 138 | – | – | – |
| Gazcon A/S, Lynge | 500 | 100 | 23 | – | – | – |
| Dynapac Compaction Equipment AB, 556068-6577, Karlskrona | 80 000 | 100 | 915 | – | – | – |
| Dynapac Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda, São Paulo | 25 777 505 | 100 | 82 | – | – | – |
| Directly owned customer centers Atlas Copco (Cyprus) Ltd., Nicosia |
99 998 | 100 | 0 | 99 998 | 100 | 0 |
| Atlas Copco Argentina S.A.C.I., Buenos Aires | 525 000 | 75/1001) | 11 | 525 000 | 75/1001) | 11 |
| Atlas Copco (India) Ltd., Mumbai | 21 723 714 | 96 | 1 700 | 21 431 921 | 95 | 1 592 |
| Atlas Copco (Ireland) Ltd., Dublin | 250 000 | 100 | 90 | 250 000 | 100 | 37 |
| Atlas Copco (Malaysia), Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur | 1 000 000 | 100 | 15 | 1 000 000 | 100 | 14 |
| Atlas Copco (Philippines) Inc., Paranaque | 121 995 | 100 | 6 | 121 995 | 100 | 6 |
| Atlas Copco (Switzerland) AG., Studen/Biel | 8 000 | 100 | 51 | 8 000 | 100 | 51 |
| GreenField Brasil Ltda, São Paulo | – | – | – | 5 997 | 100 | 4 |
| Atlas Copco (South East Asia) Pte.Ltd., Singapore | 1 500 000 | 100 | 5 | 1 500 000 | 100 | 5 |
| Atlas Copco Brasil Ltda., São Paulo | 70 358 841 | 100 | 234 | 22 909 089 | 100 | 229 |
| Atlas Copco Chilena S.A.C., Santiago de Chile | 24 998 | 100 | 9 | 24 998 | 100 | 8 |
| Atlas Copco CMT Sweden AB, 556100-1453, Nacka | 103 000 | 100 | 14 | 103 000 | 100 | 12 |
| Atlas Copco Compressor AB, 556155-2794, Nacka | 60 000 | 100 | 12 | 60 000 | 100 | 11 |
| Atlas Copco Customer Finance Chile Ltd., Santiago de Chile | 6 317 500 | 95/1001) | 0 | 6 317 500 | 95/1001) | 0 |
| GreenField AG, Birsfelden | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Atlas Copco Equipment Egypt S.A.E., Cairo | 5 | 0/1001) | 2 | 5 | 0/1001) | 2 |
| Atlas Copco Ges.m.b.H., Vienna | 1 | 100 | 332 | 1 | 100 | 54 |
| Atlas Copco Iran AB, 556155-2760, Nacka | 3 500 | 100 | 32 | 3 500 | 100 | 1 |
| Atlas Copco Eastern Africa Ltd., Nairobi | 482 999 | 100 | 5 | 482 999 | 100 | 5 |
| Atlas Copco KK, Tokyo | 375 001 | 100 | 29 | 375 001 | 100 | 27 |
| Atlas Copco Kompressorteknik A/S, Copenhagen | 4 000 | 100 | 3 | 4 000 | 100 | 3 |
| Atlas Copco Maroc SA., Casablanca | 3 854 | 96 | 1 | 3 854 | 96 | 1 |
| Atlas Copco Services Middle East OMC, Bahrain | 500 | 100 | 4 | 500 | 100 | 3 |
| Atlas Copco Venezuela S.A., Caracas | 38 000 | 100 | 15 | 38 000 | 100 | 15 |
| Chicago Pneumatic Construction Equipment AB, | ||||||
| 556197-5375, Stockholm | 30 000 | 100 | 62 | 30 000 | 100 | 56 |
| CP Scanrotor Aktiebolag, 556103-0080, Tanum | 1 500 | 100 | 2 | 1 500 | 100 | 2 |
| Servatechnik AG., Oftringen | 3 500 | 100 | 28 | 3 500 | 100 | 28 |
| Soc. Atlas Copco de Portugal Lda., Lisbon | 1 | 100 | 24 | 1 | 100 | 24 |
| AGRE Kompressoren GmbH, Garsten-St. Ulrich | 200 000 | 100 | 29 | 200 000 | 100 | 29 |
| Directly owned holding companies and others | ||||||
| Atlas Copco A/S, Langhus | 2 498 | 100 | 18 | 2 498 | 100 | 17 |
| Atlas Copco Beheer b.v., Zwijndrecht | 15 712 | 100 | 718 | 15 712 | 100 | 679 |
| Atlas Copco Dynapac AB, 556655-0413, Nacka | 86 993 823 | 100 | 5 512 | 86 993 823 | 100 | 5 508 |
| Atlas Copco Finance Belgium bvba, Wilrijk | 1 | 0/1001) | 0 | 1 | 0/1001) | 0 |
| Atlas Copco Finance Europe n.v., Wilrijk | 1 | 0/1001) | 1 | 1 | 0/1001) | 0 |
| Atlas Copco France Holding S.A., St. Ouen l'Áumône | 278 255 | 100 | 179 | 278 255 | 100 | 180 |
| Atlas Copco Holding GmbH, Essen | 1 | 100 | 290 | 1 | 100 | 278 |
| Atlas Copco Järla Holding AB, 556062-0212, Nacka | 95 000 | 100 | 20 570 | 95 000 | 100 | 20 570 |
| Atlas Copco Lugnet Treasury AB, 556277-9537, Nacka | 700 500 | 100 | 721 | 700 500 | 100 | 720 |
| Atlas Copco Reinsurance SA, Luxembourg | 4 999 | 100 | 16 | 4 999 | 100 | 16 |
| Atlas Copco Sickla Holding AB, 556309-5255, Nacka | 1 000 | 100 | 10 620 | 1 000 | 100 | 10 605 |
| Atlas Copco UK Holdings Ltd., Hemel Hempstead | 50 623 666 | 100 | 299 | 50 623 666 | 100 | 299 |
| Atlas Copco USA Holdings Inc., Pine Brook, NJ | 100 | 100 | 3 411 | 100 | 100 | 3 389 |
| CP Scanrotor Global AB, 556337-5897, Tanum | 1 000 | 100 | 0 | 1 000 | 100 | 0 |
| Dynapac Nordic AB, 556653-3658, Stockholm | 1 000 | 100 | 19 | 1 000 | 100 | 19 |
A21. Continued
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of shares |
Percent held |
Carrying value |
Number of shares |
Percent held |
Carrying value |
|
| Econus S A, Montevideo | 21 582 605 | 100 | 17 | 21 582 605 | 100 | 17 |
| Industria Försäkrings AB, 516401-7930, Nacka | 300 000 | 100 | 30 | 300 000 | 100 | 30 |
| Oy Atlas Copco AB, Vantaa | 150 | 100 | 31 | 150 | 100 | 31 |
| Power Tools Distribution n.v., Hoeselt | 1 | 0/1001) | 1 | 1 | 0/1001) | 1 |
| 16 dormant companies | 100 | 33 | 100 | 34 | ||
| Net investment hedge | –166 | 20 | ||||
| Carrying amount, Dec. 31 | 92 903 | 91 298 |
1) First figure; percentage held by Parent Company, second figure; percentage held by Atlas Copco Group.
A22. Related parties
Relationships
The Parent Company has related party relationships with its largest shareholder, its subsidiaries and its associates and with its Board members and Group Management.
The Parent Company's largest shareholder, the Investor Group, controls approximately 22 % of the voting rights in Atlas Copco AB.
The subsidiaries that are directly owned by the Parent Company are presented in note A21 and all directly and indirectly owned operating subsidiaries are listed on the following pages.
Information about Board members and Group Management is presented on pages 60–63.
Transactions and outstanding balances
The Group has not had any transactions with Investor during the year other than dividends declared and has no outstanding balances with Investor.
The Investor Group has controlling or significant influence in companies which Atlas Copco AB may have transactions with in the normal course of business. Any such transactions are made on commercial terms.
The following table summarizes the Parent Company's transactions with Group companies:
| 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenues | ||
| Dividends | 1 003 | 5 640 |
| Group contribution | 6 150 | 6 005 |
| Interest income | 237 | 212 |
| Expenses | ||
| Group contribution | –167 | –268 |
| Interest expenses | –1 013 | –1 665 |
| Receivables | 7 515 | 8 999 |
| Liabilities | 43 109 | 38 756 |
| Guarantees | 365 | 407 |
The following details directly and indirectly owned holding and operational subsidiaries (excluding branches), presented by country of incorporation.
| Country | Company | Location (City) | Country | Company | Location (City) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algeria | SPA Atlas Copco Algérie | Alger | Bolivia | Atlas Copco Boliviana SA | La Paz |
| Angola | Atlas Copco Angola Lda | Luanda | Bosnia and | ||
| Argentina | Atlas Copco Argentina S.A.C.I | Buenos Aires | Herzegovina Atlas Copco BH d.o.o. | Sarajevo | |
| Atlas Copco Servicios Mineros S.A. | Buenos Aires | Botswana | Atlas Copco (Botswana) (Pty) Ltd. | Gaborone | |
| Australia | Atlas Copco Australia Pty Limited | Blacktown | Brazil | Atlas Copco Brasil Ltda | São Paulo |
| Atlas Copco Customer Finance | Chicago Pneumatic Brasil Ltda | São Carlos | |||
| Australia Pty Limited | Blacktown | Dynapac Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda São Paulo | |||
| Atlas Copco South Pacific Holdings | Schucker do Brazil Ltda | São José dos Pinais | |||
| Pty Ltd. | Blacktown | Bulgaria | Atlas Copco Bulgaria EOOD | Sofia | |
| Austria | AGRE Kompressoren GmbH | Garsten-st. Ulrich | Atlas Copco Lifton EOOD | Rouse | |
| Atlas Copco Ges.m.b.H. | Wien | Burkina Faso Atlas Copco Burkina Faso SARL | Ouagadougou | ||
| Atlas Copco Powercrusher GmbH | St. Valentin | Cameroon | Atlas Copco Afrique Centrale SA | Douala | |
| Bahrain | Atlas Copco Services Middle East OMC | Bahrain | Canada | Atlas Copco Canada Inc. | Dorval |
| Bangladesh | Atlas Copco Bangladesh Ltd. | Dhaka | Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. Canada Ltd. Toronto | ||
| Belgium | Atlas Copco Airpower n.v. | Wilrijk | Chile | Atlas Copco Chilena S.A.C. | Santiago |
| Atlas Copco Business Services n.v. | Wilrijk | Atlas Copco Customer Finance Chile Ltda Santiago | |||
| Atlas Copco Belgium n.v. | Overijse | China | Atlas Copco (China) Investment Co., Ltd. Shanghai | ||
| Atlas Copco Finance Belgium BVBA | Wilrijk | Atlas Copco (Nanjing) Construction and | |||
| Atlas Copco Finance Europe n.v. | Wilrijk | Mining Equipment Ltd. | Nanjing | ||
| Atlas Copco Rental Europe n.v. | Wilrijk | Atlas Copco (Shanghai) Equipment | |||
| EDMAC Europe n.v. | Wilrijk | Rental Co., Ltd. | Shanghai | ||
| International Compressor Distribution NV Wilrijk | Atlas Copco (Shanghai) Process | ||||
| Power Tools Distribution n.v. | Hoeselt | Equipment Co., Ltd. | Shanghai |
| China Atlas Copco (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd. Shanghai Atlas Copco (Shenyang) Construction and Mining Equipment Ltd. Shenyang Atlas Copco (Wuxi) Compressor Wuxi Co., Ltd. Atlas Copco (Wuxi) Exploration Equipment Ltd. Wuxi Atlas Copco (Wuxi) Research and Development Center Co., Ltd. Wuxi Atlas Copco (Zhangjiakou) Construction & Mining Equipment Ltd. Zhangjiakou City Bolaite (Shanghai) Compressor Co., Ltd. Shanghai Dynapac (China) Compaction & Paving Eq Co., Ltd. Tiajin |
|
|---|---|
| Edmac (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd. Shanghai |
|
| Guangzhou Linghein Compressor Co., Ltd Guangzhou | |
| Kunshan Q-Tech Air System Technologies Ltd. Kunshan |
|
| Liuzhou Tech Machinery Co., Ltd. Liuzhou City |
|
| SCA Schucker Automation Equipment | |
| (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Shanghai |
|
| Shanghai Beacon Medaes Medical Gas Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd. Shanghai |
|
| Shanghai Tooltec Industrial Tool Co., Ltd. Shanghai |
|
| Tooltec (Qingdao) Tool Co., Ltd. Qingdao |
|
| Wuxi Pneumatech Air/Gas Purity | |
| Equipment Co., Ltd. Wuxi Wuxi Shengda Air/Gas Punty Equipment |
|
| Co., Ltd Wuxi |
|
| Colombia Atlas Copco Colombia Ltda Bogotá |
|
| Croatia Atlas Copco d.o.o. Zagreb |
|
| Cyprus Atlas Copco (Cyprus) Ltd. Nicosia |
|
| Czech Republic ALUP CZ spol. S.r.o Breclav |
|
| Atlas Copco s.r.o. Praha |
|
| Democratic Republic of |
|
| the Congo Atlas Copco DRC sprl Lubumbashi |
|
| Denmark Atlas Copco Kompressorteknik A/S Copenhagen |
|
| Gazcon A/S Lynge |
|
| Egypt Atlas Copco Equipment Egypt S.A.E. Cairo |
|
| Finland Oy Atlas Copco Ab Masaby |
|
| Oy Atlas Copco Kompressorit Ab Masaby |
|
| Oy Atlas Copco Louhintatekniikka Ab Masaby |
|
| Oy Atlas Copco Rotex Ab Tammerfors |
|
| Oy Atlas Copco Tools Ab Masaby |
|
| France ABAC France S.A.S. Valence |
|
| Atlas Copco Applications Industrielles S.A.S. Franconville |
|
| Atlas Copco Compresseurs S.A.S Franconville |
|
| Atlas Copco Crépelle S.A.S. Lille |
Atlas Copco Forage et Construction
Compresseurs Worthington
Germany ALUP Kompressoren GmbH Köngen Atlas Copco Application Center
Atlas Copco Kompressoren und
S.A.S. Franconville Atlas Copco France Holding S.A. Franconville Compresseurs Mauguière S.A.S. Sermamagny
Vibratechniques S.A.S. Saint Valéry-En-Caux
Creyssensac S.A.S. Meru ETS Georges Renault S.A.S. Nantes EXLAIR S.A.S. Chereng Seti-Tec S.A.S. Lognes
Europe GmbH Essen Atlas Copco Berg und Tunnelbautechnik GmbH Essen Atlas Copco Beteiligungs GmbH Essen Atlas Copco Construction Tools GmbH Essen Atlas Copco Energas GmbH Cologne Atlas Copco Holding GmbH Essen
Drucklufttechnik GmbH Essen
| Country | Company | Location (City) |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | Atlas Copco MCT GmbH | Essen |
| Atlas Copco Tools Central Europe GmbH Essen | ||
| Chicago Pneumatic Tool Verwaltungs | ||
| GmbH | Geisenheim | |
| Desoutter GmbH | Maintal | |
| Ekomak Kompressoren GmbH | Moers | |
| Dynapac GmbH | Wardenburg | |
| Dynapac Holding GmbH IRMER + ELZE Kompressoren GmbH |
Wardenburg Oyenhausen |
|
| SCA Schucker GmbH & Co KG | Bretten | |
| SCA Schucker Verwaltungs-GmbH | Bretten | |
| TBB Industrial Tools Services GmbH | Dingolfing | |
| Ghana | Atlas Copco Ghana Ltd. | Accra |
| Greece | Atlas Copco Hellas AE | Rentis |
| Hong Kong | Atlas Copco China/Hong Kong Ltd. | Kowloon |
| CP China/Hong Kong Ltd. | Kowloon | |
| Hungary | Atlas Copco Kft. | Budapest |
| India | Industrial Technique Hungary Kft. Atlas Copco (India) Ltd. |
Budapest |
| Indonesia | PT Atlas Copco Indonesia | Bombay Jakarta |
| PT Atlas Copco Nusantara | Jakarta | |
| Iraq | Atlas Copco Iraq LLC | Erbil |
| Ireland | Atlas Copco (Ireland) Ltd. | Dublin |
| Italy | ABAC Aria Compressa S.p.A | Robassomero |
| Atlas Copco BLM S.r.l. | Milan | |
| Atlas Copco Customer Finance | ||
| Italia S.p.A | Milan | |
| Atlas Copco Italia S.p.A. | Milan | |
| Atlas Copco Perfora S.p.A. Ceccato Aria Compressa S.p.A. |
Bagnolo Vicenza |
|
| MultiAir Italia S.r.l. | Cinisello Balsamo | |
| Japan | Atlas Copco KK | Tokyo |
| Fuji Air Tools Co., Ltd. | Osaka | |
| SCA Schucker Japan Co., Ltd. | Yokohama | |
| Kazakhstan | Atlas Copco Central Asia LLP | Almaty |
| Kenya | Atlas Copco Eastern Africa Limited | Nairobi |
| Latvia | Atlas Copco Baltic SIA | Riga |
| Lebanon | Atlas Copco Levant S.A.L. | Beirut |
| Luxembourg Atlas Copco Finance S.á.r.l. | Luxembourg | |
| Malaysia | Atlas Copco Reinsurance SA Atlas Copco (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. |
Luxembourg Kuala Lumpur |
| Mali | Atlas Copco Mali Sarl | Bamako |
| Mexico | Atlas Copco Mexicana S.A. de C.V. | Tlalnepantla |
| Atlas Copco Rental Mexico | Monterrey | |
| Desarrollos Técnologicos ACMSA | ||
| S.A. de C.V. | Tlalnepantla | |
| SCA Schucker de Mexico S.A. de C.V. | Puebla | |
| Mongolia | Atlas Copco Mongolia LLC | Ulaanbaatar |
| Morocco | Atlas Copco Maroc SA | Casablanca |
| Namibia | Mozambique Atlas Copco Mozambique Atlas Copco Namibia (Pty) Ltd. |
Maputo Windhoek |
| Netherlands ALUP Kompressoren B.V. | Nieuwegein | |
| Atlas Copco Beheer B.V. | Zwijndrecht | |
| Atlas Copco Internationaal B.V. | Zwijndrecht | |
| Atlas Copco Nederland B.V. | Zwijndrecht | |
| Cirmac International B.V. | Apeldoorn | |
| Creemers Compressors B.V. | Eindhoven | |
| Grass-Air Compressoren B.V. | Oss | |
| New Zealand Atlas Copco (N.Z.) Ltd. | Lower Hutt | |
| Nigeria | Atlas Copco Nigeria Ltd. | Lagos |
| Norway | Atlas Copco Anlegg- og Gruveteknikk A/S Langhus | |
| Atlas Copco A/S | Langhus | |
| Atlas Copco Kompressorteknikk A/S | Langhus | |
| Atlas Copco Tools A/S Berema A/S |
Langhus Langhus |
|
| Pakistan | Atlas Copco Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. | Lahore |
| Panama | Atlas Copco Central América SA | Panama |
| Atlas Copco Panama SA | Ciudad de Panama |
A22. Continued
| Country | Company | Location (City) | Country | Company | Location (City) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peru | Atlas Copco Peruana SA | Lima | Switzerland | Servatechnik AG | Oftringen |
| Philippines | Atlas Copco (Philippines) Inc. | Paranaque | Taiwan | Atlas Copco Taiwan Ltd. | Taipei |
| Poland | ALUP Kompressoren Polska sp. z.o.o. | Warszawa | Tanzania | Atlas Copco Tanzania Limited | Geita |
| Atlas Copco Polska Sp. z o.o. | Warzawa | Thailand | Atlas Copco (Thailand) Limited | Bangkok | |
| Portugal | Sociedade Atlas Copco de Portugal Lda | Lisbon | Turkey | Atlas Copco Makinalari Imalat AS | Istanbul |
| Romania | Atlas Copco Romania S.R.L. | Bucharest | Eko Teknik Endüstriyel | Istanbul | |
| Russia | Ekomak Industrial | Moscow | Ekomak Endüstriyel | Istanbul | |
| ZAO Atlas Copco | Moscow | Ekoser Endüstriyel | Istanbul | ||
| Senegal | Atlas Copco Senegal SARL | Dakar | Scanrotor Otomotiv Ticaret A.S. | Bursa | |
| Serbia | Atlas Copco A.D. | Beograd | Ukraine | LLC Atlas Copco Ukraine | Kiev |
| Singapore | ABAC DMS Air Compressors Pte. Ltd. | Singapore | United Arab | Jebel Ali free zone, | |
| Atlas Copco (South East Asia) Pte. Ltd. | Singapore | Emirates | Atlas Copco Middle East FZE | Dubai | |
| Fluidcon Services Pte. Ltd. | Singapore | Atlas Copco Services Middle East SPC | Abu Dhabi | ||
| Slovakia | Atlas Copco Compressors Slovakia s.r.o | Trencin | United | Air Compressors and Tools Ltd. | Hemel Hempstead |
| Industrial Technique s.r.o. | Bratislava | Kingdom | Atlas Copco Ltd. | Hemel Hempstead | |
| Slovenia | Atlas Copco d.o.o. | Trzin | Atlas Copco UK Holdings Ltd. | Hemel Hempstead | |
| South Africa | Atlas Copco Holdings South Africa | Atlas Copco (NI) Ltd. | Lisburn | ||
| (Pty) Ltd. | Boksburg | Medaes Limited | Staveley | ||
| Atlas Copco Investment Company | SCA Schucker UK Ltd. | Didcot | |||
| (Pty) Ltd. | Johannesburg | Uruguay | Econus S A | Montevideo | |
| Atlas Copco South Africa (Pty) Ltd. | Boksburg | USA | Atlas Copco Assembly Systems LLC | Auburn Hills, mi | |
| ZAQ Coalfields Drilling Services (Pty) Ltd. Middelburg | Atlas Copco Compressors LLC | Rock Hill, sc | |||
| South Korea Atlas Copco Mfg. Korea Co., Ltd. | Seoul | Atlas Copco Comptec LLC | Voorheesville, ny | ||
| CP Tools Korea Co., Ltd. | Seoul | Atlas Copco Construction Mining | |||
| SCA Korea Co., Ltd. | Gyunggi-do | Technique USA LLC | Commerce City, co | ||
| Spain | Aire Comprimido Industrial Iberia, S.L. | Pinto (Madrid) | Atlas Copco Customer Finance USA LLC Parsippany, nj | ||
| Atlas Copco S.A.E. | Madrid | Atlas Copco Drilling Solutions LLC | Garland, tx | ||
| Grupos Electrógenos Europa, S.A. | Zaragoza | Atlas Copco Hurricane LLC | Franklin, in | ||
| Sweden | Atlas Copco Mining and Rock Excavation Technique Sweden AB |
Nacka | Atlas Copco Mafi-Trench Company LLC | Santa Maria, ca | |
| Atlas Copco Compressor AB | Nacka | Atlas Copco North America LLC | Parsippany, nj | ||
| Atlas Copco Construction Tools AB | Kalmar | Atlas Copco Rental LLC | Laporte, tx | ||
| Atlas Copco Craelius AB | Märsta | Atlas Copco Secoroc LLC | Grand Prairie, tx | ||
| Atlas Copco Customer Finance AB | Nacka | Atlas Copco Specialty Rental LLC | Humble, tx | ||
| Atlas Copco Tools & Assembly Systems LLC |
Auburn Hills, mi | ||||
| Atlas Copco Dynapac AB | Nacka | Atlas Copco USA Holdings Inc. | Parsippany, nj | ||
| Atlas Copco GIA AB | Grängesberg | BeaconMedaes LLC | |||
| Atlas Copco Industrial Technique AB | Nacka | Rock hill, sc | |||
| Atlas Copco Järla Holding AB | Nacka | Bond Acquisition LLC | Parsippany, nj | ||
| Atlas Copco Lugnet Treasury AB | Nacka | Chicago Pneumatic International Inc. | Rock Hill, sc | ||
| Atlas Copco Rock Drills AB | Örebro | Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company LLC | Rock Hill, sc | ||
| Atlas Copco Secoroc AB | Fagersta | Houston Service Industries | Houston,tx | ||
| Atlas Copco Sickla Holding AB | Nacka | Quincy Compressor LLC | Bay Minette, al | ||
| Chicago Pneumatic Construction Equipment AB |
Nacka | Uzbekistan | Atlas Copco Compressors and Mining Technique LLC |
Tashkent | |
| Dynapac Compaction Equipment AB | Karlskrona | Venezuela | Atlas Copco Venezuela SA | Caracas | |
| Dynapac International AB | Malmö | Vietnam | Atlas Copco Vietnam Company Ltd. | Ho Chi Minh City | |
| Industria Försäkringsaktiebolag | Nacka | Zambia | Atlas Copco (Zambia) Ltd. | Ndola | |
| Switzerland | Atlas Copco (Schweiz) AG | Studen | Zimbabwe | Atlas Copco Zimbabwe (Private) Ltd. | Harare |
Signatures of the Board of Directors
The Parent Company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Sweden and the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards as prescribed by the European Parliament and the Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 dated July 19, 2002 on the application of International Accounting Standards. The Parent Company financial statements and the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the Parent Company's and the Group's financial position and results of operations.
The administration report for the Group and Parent Company provides a true and fair overview of the development of the Group's and Parent Company's business activities, financial position and results of operations as well as the significant risks and uncertainties which the Parent Company and its subsidiaries are exposed to.
Nacka, February 28, 2013
Sune Carlsson Ronnie Leten Chair President and CEO
Ulla Litzén Anders Ullberg Staffan Bohman Board Member Board Member Board Member
Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member
Margareth Øvrum Johan Forssell Gunilla Nordström Peter Wallenberg Jr
Bengt Lindgren Mikael Bergstedt Union representative Union representative
Our audit report was submitted on February 28, 2013 Deloitte AB
Jan Berntsson Authorized Public Accountant
Atlas Copco AB is required to publish information included in this annual report in accordance with the Swedish Securities Market Act. The information was made public on March 19, 2013.
Audit report
To the annual meeting of the shareholders of Atlas Copco AB Corporate identity number 556014-2720
Report on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts
We have audited the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of Atlas Copco AB for the financial year 2012, except for the corporate governance statement on pages 56–65. The annual accounts and consolidated accounts of the company are included in the printed version of this document on pages 13–44 and 56–123.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the President for the annual accounts and consolidated accounts
The Board of Directors and the President are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these annual accounts in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act and of the consolidated accounts in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as adopted by the EU, and the Annual Accounts Act, and for such internal control as the Board of Directors and the President determine is necessary to enable the preparation of annual accounts and consolidated accounts that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these annual accounts and consolidated accounts based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the annual accounts and consolidated accounts are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the annual accounts and consolidated accounts. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the company's preparation and fair presentation of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the Board of Directors and the President, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Opinions
In our opinion, the annual accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the parent company as of 31 December 2012 and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act. The consolidated accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the group as of 31 December 2012 and of its financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as adopted by the EU, and the Annual Accounts Act. Our opinions do not cover the corporate governance statement on pages 56–65. The statutory administration report is consistent with the other parts of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts.
We therefore recommend that the annual meeting of shareholders adopt the income statement and balance sheet for the parent company and the group.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
In addition to our audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, we have also audited the proposed appropriations of the company's profit or loss and the administration of the Board of Directors and the President of Atlas Copco AB for the financial year 2012. We have also conducted a statutory examination of the corporate governance statement.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the President
The Board of Directors is responsible for the proposal for appropriations of the company's profit or loss, and the Board of Directors and the President are responsible for administration under the Companies Act and that the corporate governance statement has been prepared in accordance with the Annual Accounts Act.
Auditor's responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion with reasonable assurance on the proposed appropriations of the company's profit or loss and on the administration based on our audit. We conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden.
As a basis for our opinion on the Board of Directors' proposed appropriations of the company's profit or loss, we examined the Board of Directors' reasoned statement and a selection of supporting evidence in order to be able to assess whether the proposal is in accordance with the Companies Act.
As a basis for our opinion concerning discharge from liability, in addition to our audit of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts, we examined significant decisions, actions taken and circumstances of the company in order to determine whether any member of the Board of Directors or the President is liable to the company. We also examined whether any member of the Board of Directors or the President has, in any other way, acted in contravention of the Companies Act, the Annual Accounts Act or the Articles of Association.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinions.
Furthermore, we have read the corporate governance statement and based on that reading and our knowledge of the company and the group we believe that we have a sufficient basis for our opinions. This means that our statutory examination of the corporate governance statement is different and substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing and generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden.
Opinions
We recommend to the annual meeting of shareholders that the profit be appropriated in accordance with the proposal in the statutory administration report and that the members of the Board of Directors and the President be discharged from liability for the financial year.
A corporate governance statement has been prepared, and its statutory content is consistent with the other parts of the annual accounts and consolidated accounts.
Nacka, February 28, 2013
Deloitte AB
Jan Berntsson Authorized Public Accountant
Financial definitions
Average number of shares outstanding
The weighted average number of shares outstanding before or after dilution. Shares held by Atlas Copco are not included in the number of shares outstanding. The dilutive effects arise from the stock options that are settled in shares or that at the employees' choice can be settled in shares or cash in the share based incentive programs. The stock options have a dilutive effect when the average share price during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options.
Capital employed
Average total assets less non-interest-bearing liabilities/provisions. Capital employed for the business areas excludes cash, tax liabilities and tax receivables.
Capital employed turnover ratio
Revenues divided by average capital employed.
Capital turnover ratio
Revenues divided by average total assets.
Debt/equity ratio
Net indebtedness in relation to equity, including non-controlling interests.
Dividend yield
Dividend divided by the average share price quoted.
Earnings per share
Profit for the period attributable to owners of the parent divided by the average number of shares outstanding.
EBITDA – Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization Operating profit plus depreciation, impairment and amortization.
EBITDA margin
EBITDA as a percentage of revenues.
Equity/assets ratio
Equity including non-controlling interests, as a percentage of total assets.
Equity per share
Equity including non-controlling interests divided by the average number of shares outstanding.
Interest coverage ratio
Profit before tax plus interest paid and foreign exchange differences divided by interest paid and foreign exchange differences.
Net cash flow
Change in cash and cash equivalents excluding currency exchange rate effects.
Net debt/EBITDA ratio
Net indebtedness in relation to EBITDA.
Net indebtedness/net cash position
Borrowings plus post-employment benefits minus cash and cash equivalents and other current financial assets, adjusted for the fair value of interest rate swaps.
Net interest expense
Interest expense less interest income.
Operating cash flow
Cash flow from operations and cash flow from investments, excluding company acquisitions/divestments.
Operating profit
Revenues less all costs related to operations, but excluding net financial items and income tax expense.
Operating profit margin
Operating profit as a percentage of revenues.
Profit margin
Profit before tax as a percentage of revenues.
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
Profit before tax plus interest paid and foreign exchange differences (for business areas: operating profit) as a percentage of capital employed.
Return on equity
Profit for the period, attributable to owners of the parent as a percentage of average equity, excluding non-controlling interests.
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
interest-bearing liabilities x i
-
- market capitalization x r
- interest-bearing liabilities + market capitalization
- i: An estimated average risk-free interest rate of 4% plus a premium of 0.5%. An estimated standard tax rate has been applied.
- r: An estimated average risk-free interest rate of 4% plus an equity risk premium of 5%.
Pre-tax WACC
WACC divided by (1 – estimated standard tax rate).
Five years in summary
| MSE K |
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orders received | 73 572 | 58 451 | 75 178 | 86 955 | 90 570 |
| Revenues and profit | |||||
| Revenues | 74 177 | 63 762 | 69 875 | 81 203 | 90 533 |
| Change, % | 17 | –14 | 10 | 16 | 11 |
| Change, excluding currency, % | 17 | –22 | 14 | 24 | 11 |
| Change, organic from volume and price, % | 12 | –22 | 12 | 22 | 9 |
| EBIT DA |
15 886 | 11 560 | 16 413 | 20 082 | 21 892 |
| EBIT DA margin, % |
21.4 | 18.1 | 23.5 | 24.7 | 24.2 |
| Operating profit | 13 806 | 9 090 | 13 915 | 17 560 | 19 228 |
| Operating profit margin, % | 18.6 | 14.3 | 19.9 | 21.6 | 21.2 |
| Net interest expense | –1 243 | –808 | –423 | –506 | –644 |
| as a percentage of revenues | –1.7 | –1.3 | –0.6 | –0.6 | –0.7 |
| Interest coverage ratio | 8.5 | 8.2 | 18.1 | 18.9 | 20.6 |
| Profit before tax | 13 112 | 8 271 | 13 495 | 17 276 | 18 538 |
| Profit margin, % | 17.7 | 13.0 | 19.3 | 21.3 | 20.5 |
| Profit from continuing operations | 10 006 | 6 276 | 9 944 | 12 988 | 13 914 |
| Profit for the year | 10 190 | 6 276 | 9 944 | 12 988 | 13 914 |
| Employees | |||||
| Average number of employees | 34 119 | 31 085 | 31 214 | 35 131 | 39 113 |
| Revenues per employee, SEK thousands | 2 174 | 2 051 | 2 239 | 2 311 | 2 315 |
| Cash flow1) | |||||
| Operating cash surplus | 15 805 | 11 434 | 16 673 | 19 906 | 21 583 |
| Cash flow before change in working capital | 11 874 | 7 889 | 12 555 | 14 536 | 15 938 |
| Change in working capital | –2 291 | 6 715 | –1 730 | –6 115 | –1 366 |
| Cash flow from investing activities | –4 352 | –1 014 | –2 818 | –4 335 | –2 785 |
| Gross investments in other property, plant and equipment | –1 741 | –954 | –868 | –1 728 | –1 672 |
| as a percentage of revenues | –2.3 | –1.5 | –1.2 | –2.1 | –1.8 |
| Gross investments in rental equipment 1) | –1 158 | –769 | –825 | –1 332 | –1 299 |
| Net investments in rental equipment 1) | –739 | –212 | –345 | –788 | –749 |
| as a percentage of revenues | –1.0 | –0.3 | –0.5 | –1.0 | –0.8 |
| Cash flow from financing activities | –2 706 | –6 804 | –4 740 | –12 735 | –4 270 |
| of which dividends paid 2) | –3 667 | –3 652 | –3 650 | –10 920 | –6 070 |
| Operating cash flow | 4 751 | 13 761 | 9 698 | 6 292 | 12 233 |
| Financial position and return | |||||
| Total assets | 75 394 | 67 874 | 71 622 | 75 109 | 81 149 |
| Capital turnover ratio | 1.16 | 0.89 | 1.02 | 1.14 | 1.15 |
| Capital employed | 44 372 | 53 160 | 50 006 | 49 086 | 54 579 |
| Capital employed turnover ratio | 1.67 | 1.20 | 1.40 | 1.65 | 1.66 |
| Return on capital employed, % | 33.5 | 17.7 | 28.6 | 37.2 | 35.7 |
| Net indebtedness | 21 686 | 10 906 | 5 510 | 14 194 | 8 514 |
| Net debt/EBIT DA |
1.37 | 0.94 | 0.34 | 0.71 | 0.39 |
| Equity | 23 768 | 25 671 | 29 321 | 28 839 | 35 132 |
| Debt/equity ratio, % | 91.2 | 42.5 | 18.8 | 49.2 | 24.2 |
| Equity/assets ratio, % | 31.5 | 37.8 | 40.9 | 38.4 | 43.3 |
| Return on equity, % | 57.7 | 25.8 | 37.6 | 47.6 | 44.5 |
For definitions, see page 125.
Per share data, see page 55.
Key financial data is published also on www.atlascopco.com/ir.
1) Cash flow from increase and sale of rental equipment has been reclassified from investing to operating activities as from 2009.
2) Includes share redemption in 2011.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance 1)
The environmental, social and governance information has been subject to external assurance in 2012. This can to some extent influence comparisons between this year's and previous years' performance.
| Economic value | Note | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Change, % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct economic value | ||||||||
| Revenues 2) | 77 370 | 65 374 | 70 490 | 82 274 | 91 417 | 11 | ||
| Economic value distributed | ||||||||
| Operating costs 3) | 46 084 | 41 593 | 41 466 | 48 032 | 53 656 | 12 | ||
| Employee wages and benefits, including other social costs | 14 555 | 13 339 | 14 699 | 15 910 | 18 125 | 14 | ||
| Costs for providers of capital 4) | 7 097 | 5 819 | 4 489 | 5 913 | 7 167 | 21 | ||
| Costs for direct taxes to governments | 3 194 | 2 095 | 3 619 | 3 902 | 4 377 | 12 | ||
| Economic value retained | 6 440 | 2 528 | 6 217 | 8 517 | 8 092 | –5 | ||
| – Redemption of shares | – | – | – | 6 067 | – | |||
| – Repurchase of own shares | – | – | – | – | – | |||
| Environmental performance (production | ||||||||
| units and distribution centers) | Note | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Goal 5) | |
| Material* use in '000 tonnes (iron and steel) | 3 | 138 | 104 | 141 | 135 | 142 | N/a | |
| Packaging material '000 tonnes | 3 | 34 | 26 | 30 | 35 | 36 | N/a | |
| Direct energy use in GWh 6) | 3 | 140 | 101 | 116 | 132 | 140 | N/a | |
| Indirect energy use in GWh 6) | 3 | 276 | 251 | 287 | 305 | 301 | N/a | |
| Total energy use in GWh | 3 | 416 | 352 | 403 | 437 | 441 | N/a | |
| Water consumption in '000 m3 | 547 | 523 | 464 | 619 | 623 | +–0/COS 7) | ||
| CO2 emissions '000 tonnes (direct energy) – scope 1** | 30 | 21 | 24 | 28 | 29 | –20%/COS (2020) 7) | ||
| CO2 emissions '000 tonnes (indirect energy) – scope 2** | 90 | 78 | 88 | 98 | 76 | –20%/COS (2020) 7) | ||
| CO2 emissions '000 tonnes (total energy) – scope 1+2** | 120 | 99 | 112 | 126 | 105 | –20%/COS (2020) 7) | ||
| CO2 emissions '000 tonnes (transports) – scope 3** | 305 | 206 | 194 | 214 | 227 | –20%/COS (2020) 7) | ||
| Waste in '000 tonnes | 3 | 38 | 27 | 34 | 34 | 39 | Reuse or recycle all waste | |
| Proportion of reused or recycled waste, % | 3 | 88 | 87 | 88 | 95 | 92 | 100 | |
| ISO 14001 certification, % of cost of sales 7) | 95 | 97 | 95 | 94 | 100 | |||
| ISO 14001 certification, % employees | 88 | 100 | ||||||
| Social performance, employees, health and safety | Note | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Goal 5) | |
| White-collar employees, % | 4 | 68 | 67 | 61 | 62 | 62 | N/a | |
| Blue-collar employees, % | 4 | 32 | 33 | 39 | 38 | 38 | N/a | |
| Employee turnover white-collar employees, % | 4 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 7.4 | 7.4 | N/a | ||
| Employee turnover blue-collar employees, % | 4 | 7.7 | 9.2 | N/a | ||||
| Internal mobility, % | 4 | 9.3 | 8.2 | Encourage | ||||
| Work-related accidents, number | 5 | 881 | 652 | 561 | 370 | 391 | 0 | |
| Work-related accidents, number per one million working hours | 5 | 13.8 | 11.4 | 9.3 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 0 | |
| Lost days due to accidents, number per one million working hours | 5 | 101 | 104 | 0 | ||||
| Work-related incidents, number per one million working hours | 5 | 22.8 | 23.4 | N/a | ||||
| Fatalities | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| Sick leave due to diseases, % | 2.3 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | <2.5 | ||
| Sick leave due to diseases and accidents, % | 2.1 | 2.2 | <2.5 | |||||
| Training, average number of hours per employee | 38 | 34 | 40 | 45 | 42 | N/a | ||
| Training, average number of hours, white-collar employees | 39 | 36 | 44 | 48 | 42 | N/a | ||
| Training, average number of hours, blue-collar employees | 36 | 30 | 34 | 41 | 42 | N/a | ||
| Appraisal, % | 74 | 67 | 74 | 84 | 83 | 100 | ||
| Proportion of women employees, % | 16.6 | 17.7 | 16.3 | 16.8 | 16.9 | Increase | ||
| Proportion of women managers, % | 12.9 | 13.6 | 13.5 | 14.6 | 15.1 | Increase | ||
| Nationalities among senior managers, number | 4 | 39 | 40 | 44 | 49 | Increase | ||
| OHSAS 18001 certification, % of cost of sales 7) | 61 | 67 | 72 | 100 | ||||
| OHSAS 18001 certification, % employees | 69 | 100 | ||||||
| Governance performance | Note | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Goal 5) | |
| Suppliers committed to the Business Code of Practice, % | 6 | 75 | 76 | 100 | ||||
| ISO 9001 certification, % of cost of sales | 88 | 100 | ||||||
| Training in Business Code of Practice, employees, total*** | 7 | 80 | 90 | 90 | 100 | |||
| Training in Business Code of Practice, managers, class-room training, % 8) | 7 | 33 | 25 | 100 | ||||
| Reporting to hotline, number | 7 | 20 | 25 | 39 | Encourage |
Positive trend / goal achieved Neutral Negative trend / goal not achieved
1) Calculations according to GRI Guidelines, www.globalreporting.org. Changes reflect both changes in volume, consumption and an increase in the number of reporting units.
2) Revenues include revenues, other operating income, financial income, profit from
divested companies and share of profit in associated companies.
3) Operating costs include cost of sales, marketing expenses, administration expenses, research and development expenses, other operating expenses, deducted for employee wages and benefits.
4) Costs for providers of capital include financial costs and dividend, but exclude redemption of shares and repurchase of own shares.
5) Goal base year is 2010.
- 6) Direct and indirect energy is reported in detail on the Atlas Copco website: www.atlascopco.com/corporateresponsibility.
- 7) Cost of sales (COS) in relation to ISO includes production units, while COS in other cases includes the entire Group. COS when presented in relation to sustainability information refers to cost of sales at standard cost.
8) The number of managers increased during the year, which explains the decrease in the proportion of managers trained in a class-room training on the Business Code of Practice.
- * The finished products include parts or components which are not accounted for. ** Standardized conversion factors published by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
- Initiative are used to calculate CO2 emissions, see www.ghgprotocol.org. *** Based on reporting in the control-self assessment process.
Notes to the environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance
1. Reporting principles of the environmental, social and governance performance
Since 2001, the report has been prepared yearly in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines. Since 2006 the report has followed the GRI 3.0 version guidelines. The most recent sustainability report was published in March 2012 as part of the annual report 2011.
This report is also Atlas Copco's Communication on Progress (COP), a report on performance in relation to the UN Global Compact's ten principles. It can be found at www.atlascopco.com/ir and on UN Global Compact's website at unglobalcompact.org/COP.
Atlas Copco adheres to the following internationally recognized voluntary standards and principles:
- UN Global Compact. As a signatory to the UN Global Compact, a strategic policy initiative for businesses that are committed to aligning their operations and strategies with ten universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labor, environment and anti-corruption.
- Global Reporting Initiative's (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. The guidelines (G3) include an internationally recognized set of indicators for economic, environmental and social aspects of business performance that enables stakeholders to compare companies' performance. Atlas Copco's reporting according to the reporting principles and guidance, including required disclosures, can be found at www.atlascopco.com/ir.
Reporting data collection and reporting
The sustainability report and the corporate governance report are integrated in the 2012 annual report. Reported facts and figures have been verified in accordance with Atlas Copco's procedures for internal control. Data collection is integrated into the Group reporting consolidation systems and collected on a quarterly basis. Reported values are not corrected retroactively. Environmental data covers production units and distribution centers. Business partner data covers production units and employee data covers all operations. Responsibility for reporting rests with the General Manager of each company. Data is reported at local operating unit level, aggregated to division/business area and Group level. Data verification is performed at each level before submitting to external auditors for verification.
The reporting of greenhouse gas emissions is done in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Reporting (GHG) protocol, www.ghgprotocol.org. The Group is a member of the Swedish Network for Transport and Environment (NTM) and closely follows its recommendations, which may impact the reporting guideline of CO2 emissions from transport.
Scope
The Annual Report includes information regarding all three aspects of the Group's strategy i.e. where Atlas Copco has a significant economic, environmental and social impact. The report covers Atlas Copco's operations for the fiscal year 2012, unless otherwise stated. Operations divested during the year are excluded; units that were acquired are included. This may at times cause major changes in reported performance. Limitations and reporting principles as well as any restatement of the reporting are explained in the relevant section of the report. For the reporting period of 2012 all publicly disclosed sustainability information can be found in the publication Atlas Copco's annual report 2012, except for the GRI Compliance Index, which is available on the Atlas Copco website, www.atlascopco.com/ir.
Atlas Copco's annual report 2012 includes a general overview of the Group's environmental situation in accordance with the requirements of Swedish legislation regarding environmental information in the Board of Director's Report. In addition, environmental and social information has been integrated into the annual report where appropriate in order to provide a more complete picture of the Group. In addition, Atlas Copco reports with reference to the content elements and guiding principles of the Inaugural Integrated Reporting Framework developed by the International Integrated Reporting Council. The framework is currently in a pilot phase. However, Atlas Copco is currently not a part of the pilot program.
The reason for integrating the sustainability information in the annual report is to provide investors and stakeholders with a relatively complete and easily accessible overview of the Atlas Copco Group's most important activities contributing to sustainable development and increasing shareholder value.
Materiality
The GRI core indicators reported and analyzed are those that are understood to be relevant and material to the Atlas Copco Group and its stakeholders, and which facilitate benchmarking with other companies in a broader sense. Key issues are identified through ongoing stakeholder engagement and are addressed by programs or action plans with clear measurable targets.
Stakeholder dialogue
As a global Group, it's vital for Atlas Copco to ensure accountability for its actual and potential impact on its stakeholders. In discussions with for example NGO's, GO's and other influencers, it takes advice and/or learns from listening to their views. In 2012, one formal stakeholder dialogue was conducted with major shareholders, with the participation of members of Group management. Other stakeholder dialogues are conducted at different levels in the Group. Major issues are collected and form the basis for development of strategic responses to challenges, see table on page 12 in the annual report. One result from stakeholder influence is that the report integrates financial, environmental and social aspects in the annual report.
Review/audit
Atlas Copco has self-declared the report to be GRI B+ level compliant. The report covers all Profile Disclosures, all Disclosures on management Approach and at least 20 Performance Indicators. The annual report has been reviewed and approved by Atlas Copco's Group management and the Atlas Copco Board. The sustainability information in the annual report 2012 has been subject to limited assurance by Deloitte.
2. Materiality
Atlas Copco takes inspiration from the GRI criteria for materiality to ensure that the Annual Report addresses all the sustainability issues that impact or are influenced by the Group's operations. The materiality analysis identifies relevant indicators that present significant risks or opportunities to the Group, and whether their impact can be reasonably estimated through reliable and sound investigative methods. Indicators which do not qualify on all accounts are regarded as immaterial and not reported. The remaining material indicators are prioritized based on their relevance to internal and external stakeholders. The issues that have the greatest relevance to both stakeholder groups and deemed business critical are included in the annual report. Other material issues with less priority are published on the Atlas Copco website, www.atlascopco.com/ corporateresponsibility.
The result from stakeholder dialogues is illustrated in the materiality matrix below and reflected in this report.
3. Environmental impact 1)
The major part of the Group's environmental impact from operations comes from the materials and energy consumed as part of the production and the waste resulting from these operations. The resource use follows to a great extent the business development for example regarding the use of steel. Atlas Copco strives to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions from operations. As a result of efforts taken within this area the share of indirect energy originating from renewable sources slightly increased in 2012. The waste increased both in total volumes and in relation to cost of sales. The increase is partly due to an increase in business.
3. Continued
| Material use | 2012 |
|---|---|
| Material use 2) in tonnes (iron and steel) | 142 011 |
| Aluminum | 754 |
| Rubber | 1 246 |
| Hydrocarbons | 2 086 |
| Volatile organic compounds | 285 |
| Gas | 4 130 |
1) Production units and distribution centers.
2) The finished products include parts or components which are not accounted for.
| Energy consumption*, % | 2012 |
|---|---|
| Direct energy, renewable | 0 |
| Direct energy, non-renewable | 32 |
| Indirect energy, renewable | 22 |
| Indirect energy, non-renewable | 46 |
* Direct energy is defined as purchased and consumed fuel for own production; this includes oil, coal, natural gas, gasoline and diesel. Indirect energy is defined as energy from external sources, for example energy required to produce and deliver purchased electricity and district heating.
| Waste disposal, tonnes and (%)* | 2012 |
|---|---|
| Energy recovery | 6 693 (17) |
| Material reuse | 3 268 (8) |
| Material recycling | 25 975 (67) |
| Landfill | 3 067 (8) |
* Of which regulated or hazardous waste 4 642 tonnes.
Atlas Copco follows applicable laws in all countries where it operates and reports incidents or fines for non-compliance with environmental legislation, as well as incidents involving chemical, oil or fuel spillages, in accordance with these laws. No major incidents have been reported in 2012 and no major fines have been paid.
4. Employees
Atlas Copco strives to grow local leaders where it operates. The geographical spread of employees and senior managers is in continuous development. As a customer-focused company almost 50% of all employees work in marketing, sales or service.
| Geographical spread of | Nationality of senior |
|
|---|---|---|
| employees, % | Employees | managers |
| Africa/Middle east | 7 | 6 |
| Asia/Australia | 28 | 12 |
| Europe | 43 | 69 |
| North America | 14 | 9 |
| South America | 8 | 4 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
| Employees by professional category, % | 2012 | |
| Production | 29 | |
| Marketing | 8 | |
| Sales and support | 13 | |
| Service | 28 | |
| Administration | 16 | |
| Research & development | 6 | |
| 100 |
5. Safety and health
Atlas Copco has a focused work on safety. The number of accidents increased to 391 (370). The Group takes the increase seriously and promptly addresses the issue with the concerned entities. The relative number of accidents decreased to 5.4 (5.7) per one million working hours. The reporting of incidents is new and the number of incidents was 1 710 (1 490). The Group encourages units to report accidents and incidents to be able to address safety issues at an early stage. In Asia there is a number of new and modern production sites, which partly explains the low portion of incidents or accidents.
| Geographical spread of incidents and accidents, % |
Work-related incidents |
Work-related accidents |
|---|---|---|
| Africa/Middle east | 3 | 5 |
| Asia/Australia | 8 | 11 |
| Europe | 72 | 57 |
| North America | 14 | 16 |
| South America | 3 | 11 |
| 100 | 100 |
6. Suppliers
Supplier evaluations regarding safety, health, social and environment aspects including objective factors such as quality and financial data are performed throughout the Group. The Group encourages sourcing close to production sites for business reasons and for the environmental and social benefit. Continuous work to condense the number of significant suppliers is ongoing with the aim to increase focus and materiality of activities in the supply chain. This has resulted in a lower number of significant suppliers in 2012 compared to 2011.
| Significant suppliers* by geographical spread | % |
|---|---|
| Africa/Middle East | 0 |
| Asia/Australia | 25 |
| Europe | 56 |
| North America | 17 |
| South America | 2 |
| 100 |
* A significant supplier supplies direct material to products and components or indirect material if relevant, such as oil and lubricants.
| Supplier's commitment | 2012 | 2011* | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Significant suppliers, number | 10 920 | 14 763 | |
| Safety, health and social (SHS) evaluated suppliers 1), % |
16 | 15 | 100 |
| Approved suppliers (no need to follow up), % |
95 | 92 | N/a |
| Conditionally approved suppliers (monitored), % |
4 | 7 | N/a |
| Rejected suppliers (relationship ended) 2), % |
1 | 1 | N/a |
| Suppliers asked on commitment to the Business Code of Practice, number |
6 139 | 5 958 | N/a |
| Suppliers that have confirmed their commitment to the Code, % of asked |
76 | 75 | N/a |
* Revised numbers regarding 2011.
1) Evaluations or audits are conducted by Atlas Copco teams directly at the suppliers'
sites. 2) Reasons for rejection include for example safety in the workplace, personal protection for workers and no fulfillment of environmental laws. Suppliers are rejected if they do not meet Atlas Copco requirements and are not willing to improve. The Group does not keep any black lists of its business partners.
7. Governance
Atlas Copco's hotline is the Group's whistleblower function of the Business Code of Practice. The Group is positive to receiving reports through the hotline since it provides the possibility to act on potential misconduct to the Business Code of Practice. During the year the hotline has been promoted globally among employees and business partners.
| Reported potential violations, number | 2012 |
|---|---|
| Fraud | 16 |
| Labor relations | 18 |
| Corruption | 2 |
| Discrimination | 1 |
| Other (personal, organizational issues) | 2 |
| 39 |
Four cases regarding alleged fraud are still under investigation. The alleged cases of corruption and discrimination were not substantiated and closed after investigation. Cases of fraud and labor relations were substantiated in 16 cases and led to organizational changes or disciplinary actions such as dismissal. There have been no other instances of anti-competitive behavior or corruption brought to the attention of Group management. There are no pending legal actions in this area and no fines have been paid during the year.
During the year there have been no instances of incidents involving indigenous rights among the Group's own employees and no human rights violations brought to the attention of Group management.
8. Public policy
Atlas Copco belongs to trade organizations such as The Association of Swedish Engineering Industries, the Federation for the Technology Industry in Belgium, the Compressed Air and Gas Institute in the United States, the German Engineering Federation, and many others. Since 1959, Atlas Copco has been actively involved in Pneurop, the European committee of manufacturers of compressors, vacuum pumps, pneumatic tools and allied equipment. Pneurop acts on behalf of members in European and international forums regarding the harmonization of technical, normative and legislative development of construction equipment.
Atlas Copco is a member of the Committee for the European Construction Equipment Industry (CECE) which works, for example, in removing technical barriers and improving safety standards and environmental aspects of construction equipment. In addition, the company participates in ongoing development of international standards, including the ISO committee ISO/TC 118 and the CEN committee CEN 232.
The Atlas Copco Group does not take political stands and does not use Group funds or assets to support political campaigns or candidates, or otherwise provides services to political endeavors. Atlas Copco does not receive any significant assistance from governments.
Audit review report on sustainability information
To the readers of Atlas Copco AB's annual report
Introduction
We have been engaged by the the Board of Directors and the President of Atlas Copco AB to review the sustainability information included in the annual report for the financial year 2012. Our review is limited to the information related to the financial year ended December 31, 2012, included in the printed version of this document on pages 9–12, 45–49 and 127–130, and the Atlas Copco 2012 – GRI compliance Index, disclosed on the Company's website (www.atlascopco.com). The Board of Directors and the President are responsible for the activities regarding environment, health & safety, social responsibility and sustainable development, and for the preparation and presentation of sustainability information included in the annual report in accordance with applicable criteria. Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on the sustainability information based on our review.
The scope of the review
We have performed our review in accordance with RevR 6 Assurance of Sustainability Reports issued by FAR. A review consists of making inquiries of persons responsible for the preparation of the sustainability information in the annual report, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with IAASB's Standards on Auditing and Quality Control and other generally accepted auditing standards in Sweden. The procedures performed consequently do not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Our assurance does not cover an assessment of the assumptions used by the Company or to what extent it is possible for the Company to reach certain future targets described in the report (e.g. goals, expectations and ambitions).
Our review is based on the criteria laid out in the parts of the Sustainability Reporting Guidelines G3, published by The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), which are applicable to the sustainability information in the annual report, as well as the specific accounting and calculation principles that the Company has developed and disclosed. We consider these criteria suitable for the preparation of the sustainability information in the annual report.
The main procedures of our review have included the following:
- assessment of suitability and application of the criteria referred to above considering stakeholders' need of information,
- assessment of the result of the Company's stakeholder dialogue,
- interviews with management at group level and at selected business units with the aim to assess management's process for gathering the qualitative and quantitative sustainability information stated in the annual report to ensure that it is complete, accurate and sufficient,
- examination of internal and external documents to assess if the sustainability information stated in the annual report is complete, accurate and sufficient,
- performance of analytical review procedures of reported information, • assessment of the Company's stated application level according to the GRI's guidelines,
- assessment of the overall impression of the sustainability information, and its format, taking into consideration the consistency of the stated information with applicable criteria.
Conclusion
Based on our procedures performed, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the sustainability information for the financial year 2012 has not, in all material respects, been prepared in accordance with the above stated criteria.
Nacka, February 28, 2013 Deloitte AB
Authorized Public Accountant Expert Member of FAR
Jan Berntsson Lennart Nordqvist
Financial information
Welcome to the Annual General Meeting
Atlas Copco shareholders are hereby notified that the Annual General Meeting will be held on Monday April 29, 2013 at 4 p.m. in Aula Magna, Stockholm University, Frescativägen 6, Stockholm, Sweden.
Financial information from Atlas Copco
Atlas Copco will publish the following financial reports:
| April 29, 2013 | Q1 – first quarter results |
|---|---|
| July 18, 2013 | Q2 – second quarter results |
| October 25, 2013 | Q3 – third quarter results |
| January 30, 2014 | Q4 – fourth quarter results |
| March, 2014 | Annual report 2013 |
Order the Annual report from Atlas Copco AB Corporate Communications SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden www.atlascopco.com Phone: +46 8 743 80 00 Fax: +46 8 643 37 18
Contacts:
Investor Relations: Mattias Olsson, Vice President Investor Relations, [email protected]
| Media: | Ola Kinnander, Media Relations Manager, [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Sustainability: | Karin Holmquist, Vice President Corporate Responsibility, [email protected] |
The web site www.atlascopco.com serves Atlas Copco's stakeholders with information in several languages.
In the investor section, www.atlascopco.com/ir, available in English and Swedish, you will find financial reports and key figures in ready-to-use digital formats and you can subscribe to information from the Group. Investor presentations can be downloaded and you can view and/or listen to presentations of quarterly reports.
Addresses
Atlas Copco AB
SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden
Visitors address: Sickla Industriväg 19, Nacka, Sweden Phone: +46 8 743 80 00
www.atlascopco.com Reg. No.: 556014-2720
Atlas Copco Compressor Technique
Airpower n.v. P O Box 100 BE-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium Phone: +32 3 870 21 11
Atlas Copco Compressor Technique Service P O Box 222 BE-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium Phone: +32 3 870 21 11
Atlas Copco Industrial Air P O Box 103 BE-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium Phone: +32 3 870 21 11
Atlas Copco Oil-free Air 16 F China Venturetech Plaza No. 819 Nanjing West Road Shanghai 200041, China Phone: +86 21 22 08 48 00
Atlas Copco Gas and Process Schlehenweg 15 509 99 Cologne, Germany Phone: +49 2236 965 00
Atlas Copco Quality Air P O Box 98 BE-2610 Wilrijk Phone: +32 3 870 21 11
Atlas Copco Specialty Rental 5810 Wilson Road Suite 100 Humble, TX 77396, USA Phone: +1 281 454 2200
Atlas Copco Airtec P O Box 101 BE-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium Phone: +32 3 870 21 11
Atlas Copco Industrial Technique
SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 743 80 00
Atlas Copco Industrial Technique Service SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 743 95 00
Atlas Copco MVI Tools and Assembly Systems SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 743 95 00
Atlas Copco General Industry Tools and Assembly Systems SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 743 95 00
Chicago Pneumatic Tools ZAC de la Lorie 38, Rue Bobby Sands BP 10273 FR-44818 Saint Herblain cédex, France Phone: +33 2 40 80 20 00
Atlas Copco Mining and Rock Excavation Technique
SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 743 80 00
Atlas Copco Mining and Rock Excavation Service SE-195 82 Märsta, Sweden Phone: +46 8 587 785 00
Atlas Copco Underground Rock Excavation SE-701 91 Örebro, Sweden Phone: +46 19 670 70 00
Atlas Copco Surface Drilling SE-701 91 Örebro, Sweden Phone: +46 19 670 70 00
Atlas Copco Drilling Solutions P O Box 462288 Garland, TX 75046-2288, USA Phone: +1 972 496 74 00
Atlas Copco Geotechnical Drilling and Exploration SE-195 82 Märsta, Sweden Phone: +46 8 587 785 00
Atlas Copco Rock Drilling Tools Box 521 SE-737 25 Fagersta, Sweden Phone: +46 223 461 00
Atlas Copco Rocktec SE-701 91 Örebro, Sweden Phone: +46 19 670 70 00
Atlas Copco Construction Technique
16/F China Venturetech Plaza 819 Nanjing West Road CN-200041 Shanghai, China Phone: +86 21 22 08 48 00
Atlas Copco Construction Technique Service P O Box 97 BE-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium Phone: +32 3 870 21 11
Atlas Copco Portable Energy P O Box 102 BE-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium Phone: +32 3 870 21 11
Atlas Copco Road Construction Equipment Ammerländerstrasse 93 26203 Wardenburg, Germany Phone: +49 4407 97 20
Atlas Copco Construction Tools Postfach 10 21 52 45021 Essen, Germany Phone: +49 201 633 00
Committed to sustainable productivity
Atlas Copco AB (publ) SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 743 80 00 Reg.no: 556014-2720 www.atlascopco.com