Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ASTRONICS CORP Interim / Quarterly Report 2005

Nov 15, 2005

31886_10-q_2005-11-15_ca17b966-87a0-4d9d-86c5-07bc477f7f0d.zip

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

10-Q 1 form_10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

| [X] | Quarterly
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 |
| --- | --- |
| | For the quarterly
period ended October 1, 2005 |
| | or |
| [ ] | Transition
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 |
| | For the transition
period from_ to_ |

Commission File Number

0-7087

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

| New York (State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization) | 16-0959303 (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
| --- | --- |
| 130 Commerce Way East Aurora, New York (Address of principal
executive offices) | 14052 (Zip code) |

(716) 805-1599

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

NOT APPLICABLE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

$.01 par value Common Stock, $.01 par value Class B Stock (Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [ X ]

As of October 1, 2005 7,858,351 shares of common stock were outstanding consisting of 6,342,877 shares of common stock ($.01 par value) and 1,515,474 shares of Class B common stock ($.01 par value).

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

ASTRONICS CORPORATION Consolidated Balance Sheet October 1, 2005 With Comparative Figures for December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands)

October 1, 2005 December 31,
(Unaudited) 2004
Current
Assets:
Cash $ 1,786 $ 8,476
Short-term
Investments - 1,000
Accounts
Receivable 14,096 5,880
Inventories 18,551 7,110
Prepaid
Expenses 808 560
Prepaid
Income Taxes - 796
Deferred
Taxes 50 660
Total Current
Assets 35,291 24,482
Property,
Plant and Equipment, at cost 33,147 25,252
Less
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 11,569 10,031
Net Property, Plant and
Equipment 21,578 15,221
Deferred
Income Taxes 387 488
Intangible
Assets, net of accumulated amortization of $290 in 2005 and $0 in 2004 4,261 951
Goodwill 2,686 2,615
Other Assets 1,631 1,479
$ 65,834 $ 45,236
See notes to financial statements.

2

ASTRONICS CORPORATION Consolidated Balance Sheet October 1, 2005 With Comparative Figures for December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands)

October 1, 2005 December 31,
(Unaudited) 2004
Current
Liabilities:
Current
Maturities of Long-term Debt $ 914 $ 908
Note Payable 7,000 -
Accounts
Payable 6,333 2,551
Acquisition
Earn-out Liability 3,243 -
Accrued
Payroll and Employee Benefits 2,878 1,309
Customer
Advances 2,592 -
Other Accrued
Expenses 1,438 1,077
Income Taxes
Payable 325 -
Program Loss
Reserve 262 -
Current
Liabilities of Discontinued Operations - 533
Total Current Liabilities 24,985 6,378
Long-term
Debt 10,695 11,154
Supplemental
Retirement Plan 4,652 4,543
Other
Liabilities 905 501
Common
Shareholders' Equity:
Common Stock,
$.01 par value
Authorized 20,000,000
shares, issued
7,021,315 in 2005,
6,633,805 in 2004 71 66
Class B
Common Stock, $.01 par value
Authorized 5,000,000
shares, issued
1,621,286 in 2005,
1,950,517 in 2004 16 19
Additional
Paid-in Capital 3,627 3,432
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income 800 656
Retained
Earnings 23,802 22,206
28,316 26,379
Less Treasury
Stock: 784,250 shares in 2005
and 2004 3,719 3,719
Total Shareholders'
Equity 24,597 22,660
$ 65,834 $ 45,236
See notes to financial statements.

3

ASTRONICS CORPORATION Consolidated Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings Periods Ended October 1, 2005 With Comparative Figures for 2004 (Unaudited) (dollars in thousands except per share data)

Nine Months Ended — October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004 Three Months Ended — October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004
Sales $ 54,916 $ 26,358 $ 20,421 $ 8,449
Costs and
Expenses:
Cost of
products sold 43,654 22,241 15,947 7,469
Selling,
general and administrative expenses 7,679 3,895 2,890 1,363
Interest
expense, net of interest income of $20 in 2005 and $72 in 2004 519 203 202 61
Total costs and expenses 51,852 26,339 19,039 8,893
Income (loss)
Before Income Taxes 3,064 19 1,382 (444)
Provision
(benefit) for Income Taxes 1,468 95 592 (85)
Net Income
(loss) $ 1,596 $ (76) $ 790 $ (359)
Retained
Earnings:
Beginning of
period 22,206 22,940
End of period $ 23,802 $ 22,864
Earnings
(loss) per share:
Basic $ .20 $ (.01) $ .10 $ (.05)
Diluted $ .20 $ (.01) $ .10 $ (.05)
See notes to financial statements.

4

ASTRONICS CORPORATION Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Nine Months Ended October 1, 2005 With Comparative Figures for 2004 (Unaudited) (dollars in thousands)

Cash Flows
from Operating Activities:
Net income
(loss) $ 1,596 $ (76)
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation
and Amortization 2,042 995
Deferred Tax
Provision 505 -
Other (195) 387
Cash flows
from changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of
acquisition:
Accounts
Receivable (2,183) (1,231)
Inventories (4,242) (841)
Prepaid
Expenses (165) (13)
Accounts
Payable 1,639 1,259
Income Taxes 1,339 386
Accrued Expenses 1,072 191
Net Cash
provided by Operating Activities 1,408 1,057
Cash Flows
from Investing Activities:
Acquisition
of business (13,366) -
Proceeds from
sale of short-term investments 1,000 -
Capital
Expenditures (1,765) (682)
Other (162) (204)
Net Cash used
in Investing Activities (14,293) (886)
Cash Flows
from Financing Activities:
Principal
Payments on Long-term Debt and Capital Lease
Obligations (506) (507)
Proceeds from
Note Payable 7,000 -
Proceeds from
Issuance of Stock 162 4
Net Cash
provided by (used in) Financing Activities 6,656 (503)
Effect of
Exchange Rate Change on Cash (14) (35)
Cash used in
Continuing Operations (6,243) (367)
Cash used in
Discontinued Operations (447) (58)
Net decrease
in Cash and Cash Equivalents (6,690) (425)
Cash at Beginning of Period 8,476 11,808
Cash at End of Period $ 1,786 $ 11,383
See notes to financial statements.

5

ASTRONICS CORPORATION Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

October 1, 2005

| 1) |
| --- |
| The balance sheet at
December 31, 2004 has been derived from the audited financial statements
at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes
required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. |
| For further information, refer to the financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in Astronics Corporation's
(the "Company") 2004 annual report to shareholders. |
| Stock Based Compensation - The Company accounts for
its stock-based awards using the intrinsic value method in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and its related
interpretations. The measurement prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25
does not recognize compensation expense if the exercise price of the
stock option equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date
of grant. Accordingly, no compensation expense related to stock
options has been recorded in the financial statements. |
| For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated
fair value of the Company's stock options at the date of grant is
amortized to expense over the options' vesting period in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
The Company's pro forma information for the 2005 and 2004 first nine
months and third quarters are presented in the table below: |

(Unaudited) — Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended
(dollars in
thousands, except per share data) October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004 October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004
Net Income
(loss) as reported $ 1,596 $ (76) $ 790 $ (359)
Adjustments
to record compensation expense for stock option awards under the fair value method of accounting $ (200) $ (268) $ (67) $ (79)
Pro Forma Net
Income (loss) $ 1,396 $ (344) $ 723 $ (438)
Earnings
(loss) Per Share:
Basic, as reported $ 0.20 $ (0.01) $ 0.10 $ (0.05)
Basic, proforma $ 0.18 $ (0.04) $ 0.09 $ (0.06)
Diluted, as reported $ 0.20 $ (0.01) $ 0.10 $ (0.05)
Diluted, proforma $ 0.17 $ (0.04) $ 0.09 $ (0.06)

6

2) Acquisition On February 3, 2005, the Company acquired the assets of the Airborne Electronic Systems (AES) business unit from a subsidiary of General Dynamics, for $13.0 million in cash at closing with an additional purchase consideration of up to $4.0 million based on 2005 revenue. The Company borrowed $7 million on its line of credit and used $6 million of cash on hand to finance the purchase. AES produces a wide range of products related to electrical power generation, control, and distribution on military, commercial, and business aircraft complimenting Astronics existing business. Operating results for this acquisition are included in the consolidated statement of earnings from the acquisition date. Because there is contingent purchase consideration the purchase price and allocation of the purchase price is preliminary until the contingent consideration is known. The Company expects the contingent consideration to be finalized by the end of 2005. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 141(SFAS 141) - Business Combinations, requires that when a business combination involves contingent consideration that might result in recognition of additional cost of the acquired entity when the consideration is resolved, an amount equal to the lesser of the maximum contingent consideration or the excess of fair value over the cost of the acquired entity shall be recognized as if it were a liability. When the contingency is resolved and the consideration is issued any excess of consideration over the amount that was recognized as a liability shall be recognized as additional cost of the acquired entity. If the amount initially recognized as if it was a liability exceeds the consideration issued, that excess shall be allocated as a pro rata reduction of the amounts assigned to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets acquired. In accordance with SFAS 141 the Company has recorded a current liability of $3.2 million representing the difference between the fair value of the assets acquired and the consideration paid excluding contingent consideration. As such the purchase price and allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired is preliminary and will not be finalized until December 31, 2005 when the contingent consideration is determinable. At December 31, 2005 when the contingent consideration if any, is determined, the Company will account for the additional consideration as an adjustment to the purchase price and adjust the preliminary purchase price allocation appropriately. This may affect the preliminary allocation of the purchase price for assets that are depreciated and amortized thus having an impact on depreciation and amortization expense related to those assets. Any adjustment to depreciation and amortization expense will be recorded during the period that it becomes determinable. This is anticipated to be at December 31, 2005 and will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The following table summarizes the preliminary amounts assigned to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition as of October 1, 2005. This preliminary purchase price allocation will be finalized at the conclusion of fiscal 2005 when the additional purchase consideration, if any, is determinable.

(dollars in thousands )
Current assets $ 13,218
Property, plant and equipment 6,101
Intangible assets 3,600
Other assets 120
Total assets acquired 23,039
Current liabilities 5,795
Non
current liabilities 611
Total liabilities assumed 6,406
Net
assets acquired $ 16,633

After consideration of all types of intangibles that are typically associated with an acquired business, a portion of the purchase price was ascribed only to those applicable identifiable intangible assets that had value. The Company's backlog was valued using the excess earnings method of the income approach.

7

The Company's patents were valued using the relief from royalty method of the income approach. The Company's trade names were valued using the relief from royalty method of the income approach. The Company's government programs were valued using the excess earnings method of the income approach. The Company's completed/unpatented technology was valued using the excess earnings method of the income approach. The acquired intangible assets, with the exception of trade names, are all being amortized over the expected useful life of the asset. Trade names are evaluated on an annual basis for impairment. The following table sets forth the preliminary values assigned to each class of intangible asset and the useful life of the intangible asset

(dollars in thousands) Weighted Average Life (years)
Patents $ 1,540 13
Trade name 670 N/A
Completed/Unpatented Technology 590 10
Government
Programs 420 6
Backlog
Orders 380 2
$ 3,600

The following summary, prepared on a pro forma basis, combines the consolidated results of operations of the Company with those of the acquired business for the nine and three month periods ending October 1, 2005 and October 2, 2004 as if the acquisition took place at the beginning of the fiscal year. The pro forma consolidated results include the impact of adjustments, including amortization of intangibles, increased interest expense on acquisition debt, and related income tax effects, among others. Pro forma net earnings for the nine months ended October 2, 2004 also include $192 of after tax expense related to the step-up in inventory, all of which was assumed to be incurred in the first quarter following the acquisition as inventory typically turns over once per quarter.

(Unaudited) — Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended
(dollars in
thousands, except per share data) October 1, 2005 (proforma) October 2, 2004 (proforma) October 1, 2005 (as reported) October 2, 2004 (proforma)
Sales $ 56,615 $ 44,206 $ 20,421 $ 14,324
Net Income
(loss) 1,388 (3,659) 790 (2,808)
Basic
earnings (loss) per share $ 0.18 $ (0.47) $ 0.10 $ (0.36)
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share $ 0.17 $ (0.47) $ 0.10 $ (0.36)

The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been in effect for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2004 and the nine months ended October 1, 2005. In addition, they are not intended to be a projection of future results.

3) Discontinued Operations In December of 2002 the Company announced the discontinuance of the Electroluminescent Lamp Business Group, whose business has involved sales of microencapsulated electroluminescent lamps to customers in the consumer electronics industry. As of October 1, 2005 there were no remaining assets or liabilities of discontinued operations.

8

4) Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined in accordance with the first-in, first-out method. Inventories are as follows:

(dollars in thousands) October 1, 2005 (Unaudited) December 31, 2004
Finished Goods $ 1,985 $ 644
Work in Progress 6,911 1,068
Raw Material 9,655 5,398
$ 18,551 $ 7,110

5) Comprehensive Income (loss) and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The components of Comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

(Unaudited) — Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended
(dollars in
thousands, except per share data) October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004 October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004
Net income
(loss) $ 1,596 $ (76) $ 790 $ (359)
Other
comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments 95 111 174 184
Reduction in accumulated
loss on derivatives, net of tax 49 64 12 10
Comprehensive
income (loss) $ 1,740 $ 99 $ 976 $ (165)
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) area as follows:
Cumulative
foreign currency adjustments $ 811 $ 716
Accumulated
loss on derivatives, net of tax (11) (60)
Accumulated
other comprehensive income $ 800 $ 656

9

6)
The following table sets
forth the computation of earnings per share:
(in thousands, except per share data) October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004 October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004
Net Income (loss) $ 1,596 $ (76) $ 790 $ (359)
Basic earnings per Share weighted average shares 7,843 7,758 7,858 7,762
Net effect of dilutive
stock options 163 - 236 -
Diluted earnings per
share weighted average shares 8,006 7,758 8,094 7,762
Basic earnings (loss) per
share $ .20 $ (.01) $ .10 $ (.05)
Diluted earnings (loss)
per share $ .20 $ (.01) $ .10 $ (.05)

| 7) |
| --- |
| The Company has a non-
qualified supplemental retirement defined benefit plan for certain
executives. The following table sets forth information regarding the net
periodic pension cost for the plan. |

(dollars in thousands) October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004 Three Months Ended — October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004
Service cost $ 18 $ 18 $ 6 $ 6
Interest cost 231 234 77 78
Amortization
of prior service cost 81 82 27 27
Net periodic cost $ 330 $ 334 $ 110 $ 111

Participants in the non-qualified supplemental retirement plan are entitled to paid medical, dental and long-term care insurance benefits upon retirement under the plan. The following table sets forth information regarding the net periodic cost recognized for those benefits.

(dollars in thousands) October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004 October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004
Service cost $ 3 $ 3 $ 1 $ 1
Interest cost 30 13 10 3
Amortization of prior
service cost 24 13 8 5
Amortization of net
actuarial losses 3 - 1 -
Net periodic cost $ 60 $ 29 $ 20 $ 9

10

| 8) |
| --- |
| In the ordinary course of
business, the Company warrants its products against defect in design,
materials and workmanship typically over periods ranging up to thirty
six months. On a quarterly basis, the Company determines warranty
reserves needed by assessing exposures by product line based on
experience and current facts and circumstances. Activity in the warranty
accrual is summarized below: |

(dollars in thousands) October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004 October 1, 2005 October 2, 2004
Warranty accrual at
beginning of period $ 82 $ 60 $ 273 $ 74
Additions from
acquisition 200 - - -
Additions charged to
expense 315 14 224 -
Reductions (181) - (84) -
Effect of foreign
currency translation 1 4 4 4
Warranty
accrual at end of period $ 417 $ 78 $ 417 $ 78

9) New Accounting Pronouncements On December 16, 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 123(R) (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Statement 123(R) must be adopted no later than January 1, 2006, which is when the Company expects to adopt it. As permitted by Statement 123, the Company currently accounts for share-based payments to employees using Opinion 25's intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of Statement 123(R)'s fair value method will have an impact on our results of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall financial position. The impact of adoption of Statement 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted Statement 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. Statement 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. While the Company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), no amounts of operating cash flows were recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions.

11

10) Income Taxes On April 12, 2005, New York State enacted tax legislation resulting in a change to the New York State apportionment methodology. Beginning in 2006, a single sales factor apportionment method will be phased in, with a single sales factor solely used in 2008. It is expected that this enacted legislation will result in a lower apportionment of the Company's taxable income to New York State, resulting in lower New York state income taxes. Accordingly, the Company's ability to use or realize New York State tax credits will be reduced. The Company has assessed the impact of the new tax legislation and recorded a valuation allowance reducing the Company's $490 thousand deferred tax asset relating to New York State tax credits to $40 thousand. As a result of this valuation allowance the Company recorded a non-cash charge to income tax expense of $300 thousand or $.04 per diluted share during the second quarter of 2005. The charge to income tax expense is net of the effect of federal income taxes.

12

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(The following should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.)

| The following table sets
forth income statement data as a percent of net sales: | Percent of Net Sales | | Percent of Net Sales | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Nine Months Ended | | Three Months Ended | |
| | October 1, 2005 | October 2, 2004 | October 1, 2005 | October 2, 2004 |
| Sales | 100.0 % | 100.0 % | 100.0 % | 100.0 % |
| Cost of products
sold | 79.5 | 84.4 | 78.1 | 88.4 |
| Selling, general
and administrative expense | 14.0 | 14.7 | 14.2 | 16.2 |
| Interest expense | 0.9 | .8 | 1.0 | .7 |
| Total costs and
expenses | 94.4 % | 99.9 % | 93.3 % | 105.3 % |
| Income (loss)
before taxes | 5.6 % | 0.1 % | 6.7 % | (5.3) % |

| ACQUISITION | On February 3, 2005, the
Company acquired the assets of the Airborne Electronic Systems (AES)
business unit from a subsidiary of General Dynamics, for $13.0 million
in cash at closing with an additional purchase consideration of up to
$4.0 million based on 2005 revenue. The Company used $6 million of cash
and borrowed $7 million against its line of credit to finance the
acquisition. The market value of the net assets acquired was $16.6
million. AES produces a wide range of products related to electrical
power generation, control, and distribution on military, commercial, and
business aircraft with annual sales of approximately $30.0 million. No
goodwill is expected as a result of this acquisition. Operating results
for this acquisition are included in the consolidated statement of
earnings from the acquisition date. |
| --- | --- |
| SALES | Sales for the third quarter
of 2005 increased 142% to $20.4 million compared with $8.4 million for
the same period last year. Third quarter 2005 sales include Astronics
Advanced Electronic Systems (AES), which was acquired on February 3,
2005. AES had sales of $8.4 million in the third quarter of 2005.
Organic sales grew 42% during the quarter compared to the same period
last year. Sales to the business jet market were $3.8 million, up $1.4
million, or 57%, compared with the same period in 2004. The increase of
sales to the business jet market is due primarily to an increase in
volume as production of new business jets by the airframe manufacturers
increased over last year. Sales to the commercial transport market were
up $6.5 million, or 444% to $7.9 million compared with the third quarter
of 2004. The acquisition of AES accounted for 98% of the commercial
transport market increase with the balance of the increase coming from
organic growth resulting from increased volume. Sales to the military
market were $8.3 million, up from $4.3 million in the same period of
2004. $1.9 million of the increase is attributable to the acquisition of
AES, $2.1 million of the increase came from shipments of the Company's
F-16 night vision modification kits to the Republic of Korea and the
balance of the increase is attributed to a slight increase in demand for
military products. |

13

| | 2005 year to date sales increased 108% to $54.9 million compared with
$26.4 million for the same period last year. AES sales contributed $20.7
million of the increase while organic sales grew 30% or $7.8 million.
Year to date sales to the business jet market were $11.9 million, up
$4.3 million, or 56%, compared with the same period in 2004. The
increase of sales to the business jet market is due primarily to an
increase in volume as production of new business jets by the airframe
manufacturers increased over last year. Sales to the commercial
transport market were up $17.6 million, or 354% to $22.5 million
compared with the year ago period. The acquisition of AES accounted for
$17.2 million of the increase with the balance of the increase due to
increased shipping volume. Sales to the military market were $19.5
million, up from $12.7 million in the same period of 2004. $3.1 million
of the increase is attributable to the acquisition of AES, $3.1 million
of the increase came from shipments of the Company's F-16 night vision
modification kits to the Republic of Korea and the balance of the
increase is attributed to a slight increase in demand for military
products. |
| --- | --- |
| EXPENSES AND MARGINS | Cost of products sold as a
percentage of sales decreased 10.3 percentage points to 78.1% for the
third quarter of 2005 compared to 88.4% for the same period last year.
AES gross margins helped to further increase the improving margins of
Astronics organic business as compared to the third quarter of 2004.
Excluding AES activity for the third quarter of 2005, cost of products
sold would have been 84.6%, a decrease of 3.8 percentage points over
last year. That decrease was primarily a result of changes in product
mix and increased sales volumes absorbing fixed costs offset by an
increase in the Company's engineering costs for the third quarter of
2005 as compared to 2004. Engineering costs for the 2005 third quarter
increased $0.4 million as compared to last year's third quarter. This
increase was partially offset by an increase of non-recurring
engineering revenues of $0.2 million. Year to date costs of products sold decreased by 4.9 percentage
points to 79.5% of sales as compared to 84.4% for the same period last
year. As with the quarter, the addition of AES activity for 2005 has
reduced cost of products sold as a percentage of sales. Excluding AES
activity for the first nine months of 2005, cost of products sold as a
percentage of sales would have been 85.1%, an increase of 0.7 percentage
points over last year from 84.4%. That increase was primarily a result
of an increase in engineering costs of approximately $1.1 million as
compared to the first nine months of 2004, offset by increased sales
volumes absorbing fixed costs as well as changes in product mix.
Excluding the increase of engineering costs, year to date cost of
products sold for the organic business, excluding AES, would have
improved by 3.3 percentage points to 81.8% of sales. These engineering
costs are a result of an increase in personnel as well as increased
costs for goods and services supplied by vendors such as qualification
testing and outsourced testing and design work as compared to last year. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense as a percent of
sales was 14.2% for the third quarter of 2005, a decrease of 2
percentage points compared with 16.2% for the same period of 2004. SG&A
costs increased from $1.4 million during the third of 2004 to $2.9
million in 2005 primarily as a result of the AES acquisition and an
increase in costs associated with audit and other professional services. For the first nine months of 2005, SG&A as a percentage of sales was
14.0% compared to 14.7% for the same period of 2004. Year to date SG&A
costs increased from $3.9 million in 2004 to $7.7 million in 2005
primarily as a result of the AES acquisition and an increase in costs
associated with audit and other professional services. |

14

| | Net interest expense for the
third quarter increased by $141 thousand from $61 thousand in the third
quarter of 2004 to $202 thousand for the same period of 2005. This
increase was a result of reduced interest income, increased borrowings
and increased interest rates. In February 2005 the Company borrowed $7.0
million and used $6.0 million of cash to acquire AES, this resulted in
increased net interest expense. Net interest expense for the first nine months of 2005 increased by
$316 thousand from $203 thousand to $519 thousand for the same reasons. |
| --- | --- |
| TAXES | The effective income tax
rate for the third quarter of 2005 was 42.8% compared to an income tax
benefit of 19.1% last year recorded as a result of the loss during the
third quarter of 2004 off-set by foreign taxes based on capital and
state taxes. For the third quarter of 2005, foreign and state taxes
primarily accounted for the difference between the statutory rate and
the effective rate of 42.8%. The effective income tax rate for the first nine months of 2005 was
47.9% compared to 500% in 2004. The effective rate for 2004 was greater
than the pre-tax income due to foreign taxes on capital and state taxes
that could not be offset by losses. On April 12, 2005, New York State
enacted tax legislation resulting in a change to the New York State
apportionment methodology. Beginning in 2006, a single sales factor
apportionment method will be phased in, with a single sales factor
solely used in 2008. It is expected that this enacted legislation will
result in a lower apportionment of the Company's taxable income to New
York State, resulting in lower New York State income taxes. Accordingly,
the Company's ability to use or realize New York State tax credit carry
forwards will be reduced. The Company has assessed the impact of the new
tax legislation and recorded a valuation allowance reducing the
Company's $490 thousand deferred tax asset relating to New York State
tax credits to $40 thousand. As a result of this valuation allowance the
Company recorded a non-cash charge to income tax expense of $300
thousand or $.04 per share during the second quarter of 2005. The charge
to income tax expense is net of the affect of federal income taxes. The
Company expects its effective income tax rate to approximate the
statutory rates in the future. |
| NET INCOME AND EARNINGS
PER SHARE | Net income for the third
quarter of 2005 was $0.8 million, or $0.10 per share, an increase of
$1.2 million from a loss of $0.4 million, or $(0.05) per share in the
third quarter of 2004. The increased net income as compared to the third
quarter of 2004 was due primarily to the acquisition of AES which
contributed $1.1 million to pre tax income. Changes in the number of
shares outstanding did not significantly impact the calculation. Year
to date net income was $1.6 million, or $0.20 per share, an increase of
$1.7 million from a loss of $0.1 million, or $(0.01) per share last
year. The increased net income as compared to 2004 was due primarily to
the acquisition of AES which contributed $2.7 million to pre tax income.
Changes in the number of shares outstanding did not significantly impact
the calculation. |
| LIQUIDITY | Cash provided by operating activities was $1.4
million during the first nine months of 2005, as compared with $1.1
million in 2004 as a result of net income plus depreciation and
amortization and changes in working capital components. Cash used in investing activities increased to $14.3
million in the first nine months of 2005, from $0.9 million in the first
nine months of 2004 due to the $13.4 million acquisition of AES, and
increase in capital equipment spending of $1.1 million offset partially
by proceeds from the sale of short -term investments of $1.0 million.
The Company's capital expenditures for the first nine months were $1.8
million. Capital expenditures for the balance of 2005 are expected to be
in the range of $0.6 million to $0.8 million. |

15

| | The Company's cash provided by financing
activities increased $7.2 million to $6.7 million as a result of the
$7.0 million drawn on the line of credit to partially fund the AES
acquisition offset partially by scheduled debt payments. The Company has
a $15 million demand line of credit facility available. Interest on
outstanding borrowings bears interest at either LIBOR or prime interest
rates at the Company's option plus an applicable margin, currently 175
basis points. As of October 1, 2005 the Company had borrowed $7.0
million against the line of credit. The line is subject to annual review
and is payable on demand. The line of credit, among other requirements,
imposes certain financial performance covenants measured on an annual
basis with which the Company anticipates it will be compliant. The Company has a cash balance of $1.8 million at October 1, 2005. The Company believes that cash balances at October 1, 2005, cash flow
from operations and its available credit facility will be adequate to
meet the Company's operational and capital expenditure requirements for
2005. |
| --- | --- |
| BACKLOG | The Company's backlog at October 1, 2005 was $77.6
million compared with $25.6 million at the end of the third quarter of
2004. The backlog at October 1, 2005 includes $50.0 million from AES. |
| CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
AND COMMITMENTS | The Company's contractual obligations and commercial
commitments have not changed materially from disclosures in the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, except with
respect to the Company's acquisition of AES. The following table showing
the additional obligations and commitments related to the AES
acquisition should be considered in addition to the table appearing in
the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. |

ASTRONICS ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS (AES) CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS (in thousands) Total >1 year 1-2 years 3-4 years After 4 years
Line of Credit
borrowing $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ - $ - $ -
Operating Leases 2,035 204 1,621 210 -
Unconditional
Purchase Obligations 8,214 3,480 4,423 311 -
Total Contractual
Obligations $ 17,249 $ 10,684 $ 6,044 $ 521 $ -

MARKET RISK The Company's exposure to interest rate fluctuations increased as compared to December 31, 2004 as a result of additional borrowings related to its acquisition of AES. The Company had floating interest rate debt obligations totaling $18.6 million at October 1, 2005. The Company has an interest rate swap on its New York Industrial Revenue Bond which effectively fixes the rate at 4.09% on this $4.7 million obligation through December 2005. As a result, a 1% change in interest rates would impact annual net income by $0.1 million. Refer to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a complete discussion of the Company's market risk. There have been no material changes in the current year regarding the market risk information for its exposure to currency exchange rates.

16

| CRITICAL ACCOUNTING
POLICIES | Refer to the
Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004 for a complete discussion of the Company's critical accounting
policies. There have been no material changes in the current year
regarding these critical accounting policies. |
| --- | --- |
| NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS | See note 9 in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for recently
issued accounting standards that may have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations |
| FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS | This Quarterly Report contains "forward-looking
statements". Such statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to
differ materially from the results expressed or implied by such
statements, including general economic and business conditions affecting
our customers and suppliers, competitors' responses to our products and
services, particularly with respect to pricing, the overall market
acceptance of such products and services, and successful completion of
our capital expansion program. We use words like "will," "may,"
"should," "plan," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "future"
and other similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of their respective dates. These forward-looking
statements are based on our current expectations and are subject to
number of risks and uncertainties. Our actual operating results could
differ materially from those predicted in these forward-looking
statements, and any other events anticipated in the forward-looking
statements may not actually occur. |

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk See Market Risk in Item 2, above.

| Item 4. |
| --- |
| The
Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of
October 1, 2005. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 1, 2005.
There were no material changes in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting during the third quarter of 2005. |

17

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings .
None.
Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity
securities and use of proceeds.
(c) the following table
summarizes the Company's purchases of its common stock for the quarter
ended October 1, 2005

| Period | (a) Total number of shares Purchased | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | (c) total number of shares Purchased as part of Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs | (d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Programs |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| July 3, - July 30, 2005 | - | - | - | 432,956 |
| July 31, - August 27, 2005 | - | - | - | 432,956 |
| August 28, - October 1, 2005 | - | - | - | 432,956 |
| Total | - | - | - | 432,956 |

| Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior
Securities . |
| --- | --- |
| | None. |
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to
a Vote of Securities Holders . |
| | None |
| Item 5. | Other Information . |
| | None. |
| Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on
Form 8-K |
| | (a) Exhibits |
| | Exhibit 31.1 Section 302
Certification - Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 31.2 Section 302
Certification - Chief Financial Officer Exhibit 32. Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |

(b) Reports on Form 8-K The Company filed a form 8-K on November 8, 2005, regarding its press release announcing its 2005 year to date and third quarter earnings.

18

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ASTRONICS CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Date: November 14, 2005 By: /s/ David C. Burney
David C. Burney Vice President-Finance and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

19