Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ASPEN GROUP Governance Information 2020

Oct 26, 2020

64404_rns_2020-10-26_845d47a3-b6ca-4b1f-846c-59a312e8b53e.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3[1]

Appendix 4G

Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations

Name of entity:

Name of entity:
Aspen Group Limited
ACN / ARBN:
004 160 927
Financial year ended:
004 160 927 30 June 2020

Our corporate governance statement[2] for the above period above can be found at:[3]

These pages of our annual report:

This URL on our website: http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-information/corporate-governance/.

The Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 23 October 2020 and has been approved by the board.

The annexure includes a key to where our corporate governance disclosures can be located.

Date: 27 October 2020

Belinda Cleminson

Company Secretary

1 Under Listing Rule 4.7.3, an entity must lodge with ASX a completed Appendix 4G at the same time as it lodges its annual report with ASX. Listing Rule 4.10.3 requires an entity that is included in the official list as an ASX Listing to include in its annual report either a corporate governance statement that meets the requirements of that rule or the URL of the page on its website where such a statement is located. The corporate governance statement must disclose the extent to which the entity has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council during the reporting period. If the entity has not followed a recommendation for any part of the reporting period, its corporate governance statement must separately identify that recommendation and the period during which it was not followed and state its reasons for not following the recommendation and what (if any) alternative governance practices it adopted in lieu of the recommendation during that period. Under Listing Rule 4.7.4, if an entity chooses to include its corporate governance statement on its website rather than in its annual report, it must lodge a copy of the corporate governance statement with ASX at the same time as it lodges its annual report with ASX. The corporate governance statement must be current as at the effective date specified in that statement for the purposes of rule 4.10.3.

2 “Corporate governance statement” is defined in Listing Rule 19.12 to mean the statement referred to in Listing Rule 4.10.3 which discloses the extent to which an entity has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council during a particular reporting period.

3 Mark whichever option is correct and then complete the page number(s) of the annual report, or the URL of the web page, where the entity’s corporate governance statement can be found. You can, if you wish, delete the option which is not applicable.

Throughout this form, where you are given two or more options to select, you can, if you wish, delete any option which is not applicable and just retain the option that is applicable. If you select an option that includes “OR” at the end of the selection and you delete the other options, you can also, if you wish, delete the “OR” at the end of the selection.

Page 1

ANNEXURE – KEY TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DISCLOSURES

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
PRINCIPLE 1 – LAY SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT
1.1 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and
management; and
(b)
those matters expressly reserved to the board and those
delegated to management.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and information about the respective roles and responsibilities of
our board and management (including those matters expressly
reserved to the board and those delegated to management):

athttp://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/.

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.2 A listed entity should:
(a)
undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person, or
putting forward to security holders a candidate for election,
as a director; and
(b)
provide security holders with all material information in its
possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect
or re-elect a director.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.3 A listed entity should have a written agreement with each director
and senior executive setting out the terms of their appointment.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.4 The company secretary of a listed entity should be accountable
directly to the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with the
proper functioning of the board.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 2

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
1.5 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a diversity policy which includes requirements for the
board or a relevant committee of the board to set
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to
assess annually both the objectives and the entity’s progress
in achieving them;
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it; and
(c)
disclose as at the end of each reporting period the
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by
the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance
with the entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards
achieving them and either:
(1) the respective proportions of men and women on the
board, in senior executive positions and across the
whole organisation (including how the entity has defined
“senior executive” for these purposes); or
(2) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace
Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender
Equality Indicators”, as defined in and published under
that Act.
… the fact that we have a diversity policy that complies with
paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of our diversity policy or a summary of it:
athttp://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/.
… and the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by
the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance with our
diversity policy and our progress towards achieving them:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (c)(1) or (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.6 A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the
performance of the board, its committees and individual
directors; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting
period in accordance with that process.
… the evaluation process referred to in paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.7 A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the
performance of its senior executives; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting
period in accordance with that process.
… the evaluation process referred to in paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 3

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
PRINCIPLE 2 - STRUCTURE THE BOARD TO ADD VALUE
2.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a nomination committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs to address board
succession issues and to ensure that the board has the
appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience,
independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its
duties and responsibilities effectively.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a nomination committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a nomination committee and the
processes we employ to address board succession issues and to
ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of skills,
knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to
discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.2 A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix
setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board currently
has or is looking to achieve in its membership.
… our board skills matrix:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 4

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
2.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the names of the directors considered by the board to be
independent directors;
(b)
if a director has an interest, position, association or
relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 but the board
is of the opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature of the interest,
position, association or relationship in question and an
explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and
(c)
the length of service of each director.
… the names of the directors considered by the board to be
independent directors:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
in the Directors Report of the Annual Report
… and, where applicable, the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the length of service of each director:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
in the Directors Report of the Annual Report

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
2.4 A majority of the board of a listed entity should be independent
directors.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.5 The chair of the board of a listed entity should be an independent
director and, in particular, should not be the same person as the
CEO of the entity.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.6 A listed entity should have a program for inducting new directors
and provide appropriate professional development opportunities
for directors to develop and maintain the skills and knowledge
needed to perform their role as directors effectively.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
PRINCIPLE 3 – ACT ETHICALLY AND RESPONSIBLY
3.1 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a code of conduct for its directors, senior executives
and employees; and
(b)
disclose that code or a summary of it.
… our code of conduct or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
athttp://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-information/corpora
governance/.
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 5

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
PRINCIPLE 4 – SAFEGUARD INTEGRITY IN CORPORATE REPORTING
4.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have an audit committee which:
(1) has at least three members, all of whom are non-
executive directors and a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director, who is not the
chair of the board,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the relevant qualifications and experience of the
members of the committee; and
(5) in relation to each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact
and the processes it employs that independently verify and
safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting, including
the processes for the appointment and removal of the
external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement
partner.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have an audit committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
athttp://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/.
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
in the Directors Report of the Annual Report
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have an audit committee and the processes
we employ that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of our
corporate reporting, including the processes for the appointment and
removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit
engagement partner:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
4.2 The board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s
financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO
and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial records
of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial
statements comply with the appropriate accounting standards
and give a true and fair view of the financial position and
performance of the entity and that the opinion has been formed
on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal
control which is operating effectively.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 6

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
4.3 A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its external
auditor attends its AGM and is available to answer questions
from security holders relevant to the audit.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity that does not hold an
annual general meeting and this recommendation is therefore
not applicable
PRINCIPLE 5 – MAKE TIMELY AND BALANCED DISCLOSURE
5.1 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a written policy for complying with its continuous
disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
… our continuous disclosure compliance policy or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
athttp://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/.

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
PRINCIPLE 6 – RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS
6.1 A listed entity should provide information about itself and its
governance to investors via its website.
… information about us and our governance on our website:
athttp://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/.

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
6.2 A listed entity should design and implement an investor relations
program to facilitate effective two-way communication with
investors.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
6.3 A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes it has in
place to facilitate and encourage participation at meetings of
security holders.
… our policies and processes for facilitating and encouraging
participation at meetings of security holders:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity that does not hold
periodic meetings of security holders and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
6.4 A listed entity should give security holders the option to receive
communications from, and send communications to, the entity
and its security registry electronically.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 7

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
PRINCIPLE 7 – RECOGNISE AND MANAGE RISK
7.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each of
which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the processes it
employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management
framework.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a committee or committees to oversee risk
that comply with paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/
and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
in the Annual Report
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) and the processes we employ for overseeing our risk
management framework:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
7.2 The board or a committee of the board should:
(a)
review the entity’s risk management framework at least
annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether such
a review has taken place.
… the fact that board or a committee of the board reviews the entity’s
risk management framework at least annually to satisfy itself that it
continues to be sound:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and that such a review has taken place in the reporting period
covered by this Appendix 4G:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 8

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
7.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
if it has an internal audit function, how the function is
structured and what role it performs; or
(b)
if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact and
the processes it employs for evaluating and continually
improving the effectiveness of its risk management and
internal control processes.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… how our internal audit function is structured and what role it
performs:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have an internal audit function and the
processes we employ for evaluating and continually improving the
effectiveness of our risk management and internal control processes:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
7.4 A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material
exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainability
risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those
risks.
… whether we have any material exposure to economic,
environmental and social sustainability risks and, if we do, how we
manage or intend to manage those risks:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 9

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …
PRINCIPLE 8 – REMUNERATE FAIRLY AND RESPONSIBLY
8.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a remuneration committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs for setting the level and
composition of remuneration for directors and senior
executives and ensuring that such remuneration is
appropriate and not excessive.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a remuneration committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
in the Annual Report
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a remuneration committee and the
processes we employ for setting the level and composition of
remuneration for directors and senior executives and ensuring that
such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is
therefore not applicable
8.2 A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive directors
and the remuneration of executive directors and other senior
executives.
… separately our remuneration policies and practices regarding the
remuneration of non-executive directors and the remuneration of
executive directors and other senior executives:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
in the Remuneration Report section of the Annual Report.

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
8.3 A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme
should:
(a)
have a policy on whether participants are permitted to
enter into transactions (whether through the use of
derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of
participating in the scheme; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
… our policy on this issue or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
athttp://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/.

an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR

w e do not have an equity-based remuneration scheme and this
recommendation is therefore not applicableOR

we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 10

Corporate Governance Statement

This statement outlines the corporate governance framework and practices of ASX-listed Aspen Group Limited ( APZ or the Company ) in the form of a report against the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (3[rd] Edition) (ASX Principles).

APZ is comprised of Aspen Group Limited (“AGL”) and Aspen Property Trust (“APT”). APT is an externally managed entity, whose responsible entity is Evolution Trustees Limited (“Evolution” or “the RE”). Each AGL shares is stapled to a APT unit, and the stapled securities are quoted on ASX under the ticker APZ.

AGL and the RE have distinct boards, each of which functions independently of the other. Each has a commitment to high standards of corporate governance, and operates in accordance with their own policies and procedures.

The table below summarises the Company's compliance with the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Principles and Recommendations.

PRINCIPLE 1 – LAY SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT

Corporate Governance Council
Recommendation
Compliance Disclosure
1.1 A listed entity should disclose:
(a) The
respective
roles
and
responsibilities
of
its
board
and
management; and
(b) those matters expressly reserved to the
board
and
those
delegated
to
management.
Complies AGL Board
The Board has overall responsibility for the governance of Aspen. Its primary role is to ensure security holders’
interests are protected and the value of their investment is maximised within acceptable risk parameters.
The Board has adopted a Board Charter that sets out the roles, responsibilities, structures and processes
adopted by the Board of Aspen Group Limited, including:

Role and responsibilities of the Board

Role of Chair

Role of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and executive management team

Role of Company Secretary

Composition and structure of the Board

Independent Directors

Independence of Chair

Orientation and education

Board and executive performance evaluation

1

The Board Charter is available on Aspen’s website at:http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/
The day to day management of Aspen is the responsibility of the joint CEO’s supported by the executive
management team. The Board has specifically reserved some matters for its decision and delegates authority
for all other matters that are necessary for the day-to-day management of Aspen’s business to the joint CEO’s.
RE Board
The RE Board delegates to Evolution’s management all matters not reserved for the RE board, including the
day to day management and the operation of APT. Directors, management and staff are guided by both
Evolution and Aspen Group’s Codes of Conduct which are designed to assist in making ethical decisions.
The role of the RE Board is generally to set the objectives and goals for the operation of the RE and APT, to
oversee the RE’s management, to review performance and to monitor the RE’s affairs acting in the best
interests of the unitholders of APT.
The RE Board is accountable to the unitholders of APT. It is responsible for approving the RE’s overall
objectives and overseeing their implementation in discharging their duties and obligations to APT.
The role of the RE’s management is to manage the business of the RE in operating APT.
1.2 A listed entity should:
(a) undertake
appropriate
checks
before
appointing a person, or putting forward to
security holders a candidate for election, as
a director; and
(b) provide security holders with all material
information in its possession relevant to a
decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect
a director.
Complies AGL Board
(a) Prior to appointing or putting forward a candidate for election to the Board each Board Director has the
opportunity to meet with any person recommended to become a Director. Aspen undertakes appropriate
checks before appointing a person as a Director.
(b) Directors are elected in accordance with the Aspen Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules. Security
holders are provided with all material information in Aspen’s possession that is relevant to their decision on
whether or not to elect or re-elect a Director, either in the notice of the meeting at which the election.
RE Board
Thisrecommendation isnot applicable to theRE.
1.3 A listed entity should have a written agreement
with each director and senior executive setting
out the terms oftheirappointment.
Complies AGL Board

2

Formal letters of appointment are provided to all new Directors and employment agreements to senior
executives, setting out key terms, conditions, obligations and expectations of their appointment.
RE Board
This recommendation is not applicable to the RE.
1.4 The company secretary of a listed entity should
be accountable directly to the board, through the
chair, on all matters to do with the proper
functioning of the board.
Complies AGL Board
The Company Secretary is accountable to the Board, through the Chair, on all governance matters. The
Company Secretary is charged with facilitating Aspen’s corporate governance processes and ensuring that
the Board policies and procedures run efficiently and effectively. All Directors have right of access to the
Company Secretary.
The Joint Company Secretaries are Mark Licciardo, Belinda Cleminson and David Dixon.
RE Board
This recommendation is not applicable to the RE.
1.5 A listed entity should:
(a) have a diversity policy which includes
requirements for the board or a relevant
committee of the board to set measurable
objectives for achieving gender diversity
and to assess annually both the objectives
and the entity’s progress in achieving them;
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it; and
(c) disclose as at the end of each reporting
period
the
measurable
objectives
for
achieving gender diversity set by the board
or a relevant committee of the board in
accordance with the entity’s diversity policy
and its progress towards achieving them and
either:
(1) the respective proportions of men and
women on the board, in senior executive
positions
and
across
the
whole
organisation (including how the entity
has defined “senior executive” for these
purposes); or
Complies AGL Board
(a) A process has been developed and adopted by the Board for the identification of persons suitable for
consideration as a Director. One of the key components of the process is the range of skills, expertise,
experience, background and competencies required to enhance Board diversity and performance.
Aspen respects and values “diversity”, and the benefit of its integration throughout Aspen, which is also
expected to enrich Aspen’s perspective, improve corporate performance, and increase security holder value.
Aspen values a diverse and inclusive workforce which reflects the broader community. Aspen recognises the
advantages of having a mix of relevant business and professional experience, as well as the benefits of having
cultural, ethnic and gender diversity.
(b)
A
Diversity
Policy
has
been
established
and
is
available
on
Aspen’s
website
at:http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-information/corporate-governance/.
(c) Due to the size of the Board and the business, and the nature of Aspen’s operations, the diversity policy
does not currently incorporate specific measurable objectives or method of reviewing process towards those
objectives. Aspen adopts a nomination process for Directors and a recruitment and selection process for

3

(2) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under
the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the
entity’s most recent “Gender Equality
Indicators”, as defined in and published
under that Act.
employees designed to promote diversity. The Board is therefore of the view that the current policy and
procedures are fair and free of any discrimination in terms of individual’s employment.
(1) As a measurement of gender diversity, the proportion of women employees in the consolidated
entity as at 30 June 2020 are as follows:
Women on the Board: 0%
Women in senior executive roles: 0%
Women in management position: 0%
Women in the organisation: 21%
(2)
The Company is not a relevant employer under the Workplace Gender Equality Act.
RE Board
Thisrecommendation isnot applicable to theRE.
1.6 A listed entity should:
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically
evaluating the performance of the board, its
committees and individual directors; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period,
whether a performance evaluation was
undertaken in the reporting period in
accordance with that process.
Complies AGL Board
(a) In accordance with the Board Charter, the Board ensures that there is an effective on-going performance
evaluation process in place for Directors.
On an annual basis, the Board must adopt a review process, overseen by the Chair. The process is conducted
in a confidential manner by the Chair, which involves a peer evaluation assessing each individual Director’s
performance and competence, contribution to the Board and feedback on enhancing performance via
questionnaires. The Chair’s performance is also evaluated during the process. Directors are encouraged
during this process to raise any matter, either positive or negative, which they believe will contribute to the on-
going effectiveness of the Board.
(b) The Board conducted an internal performance review of the Board, its committee and Directors. The
performance review process was then conducted and the Chairman held individual discussions with each
Director.
RE Board
Thisrecommendation isnot applicable to theRE.

4

1.7 A listed entity should:
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically
evaluating the performance of its senior
executives; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period,
whether a performance evaluation was
undertaken
in
the
reporting
period
in
accordance with that process.
Complies AGL Board
(a) All employees, including senior executives, participate in a review process which assesses individual
performance against predetermined objectives. The process evaluates the individual’s contribution to the
organisation, gains feedback on enhancing performance and insight into future career aspirations. The
outcomes of the review are used as a basis for determining appropriate remuneration packages and the most
efficient organisational structure.
(b) Performance evaluations were conducted for senior executives with more than six months’ service during
the 2020 financial year. A more detailed description of the performance reviews is contained in the 2020
Annual Report. Outcomes of the performance reviews are communicated to the Board.
RE Board
Thisrecommendation isnot applicable to theRE.

PRINCIPLE 2 – STRUCTURE THE BOARD TO ADD VALUE

2.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a nomination committee which:
1. has at least three members, a majority of
whom are independent directors; and
2. is chaired by an independent director,
and
disclose
the
charter
of
the
committee,
the
members
of
the
committee; and
3. as at the end of each reporting period,
the number of times the committee met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances of the members at those
meetings:OR
(b) if it does not have a nomination committee,
disclose that fact and the processes it
employs to address board succession issues
and to ensure that the board has the
appropriate balance of skills, knowledge,
experience,independence and diversity to
Complies AGL Board
The Board considered that Aspen is not of a size nor complexity to have a separate Nomination Committee.
The responsibility for monitoring succession and nominating new directors is currently a function reserved for
the Board as a whole. The Board identifies suitable candidates to fill vacancies as they arise with consideration
to the optimal mix of skills and diversity. The Board’s selection process is outlined in the Board Charter, which
is available on Aspen’s website at:http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-information/corporate-
governance/.
RE Board
This recommendation is not applicable to the RE.

5

enable it to discharge its duties and
responsibilities effectively.
2.2 A listed entity should have and disclose a board
skills matrix setting out the mix of skills and
diversity that the board currently has or is looking
to achieve in its membership.
Complies AGL Board
The key skills required by the Board are highlighted in the table below, the Board believes that there are
sufficient Directors with these skills and there are no significant deficiencies in these skills in the current Board.
Skills and Experience (out of
3 Directors)
Leadership and Management
Capital markets
Corporate/Executivemanagement
3
Capital raising
3
Fundsmanagement
3
Capital management
2
Strategy
3
Corporate actions
3
Sector experience
Corporate
Propertyinvestment/development
3
Business operation
3
Real Estate
3
Investor relations
3
Finance and Risk
Financial
3
Risk management
3
Skills and Experience (out of 3 Directors)
Leadership and Management Capital markets
Corporate/Executivemanagement 3 Capital raising 3
Fundsmanagement 3 Capital management 2
Strategy 3 Corporate actions 3
Sector experience Corporate
Propertyinvestment/development 3 Business operation 3
Real Estate 3 Investor relations 3
**Finance and Risk **
Financial 3 Risk management 3
RE Board
This recommendation is not applicable to the RE.
2.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a) the names of the directors considered by the
board to be independent directors;
(b) if a director has an interest, position,
association or relationship of the type
described in Box 2.3 of the ASX Corporate
Governance
Principles
and
Recommendations but the board is of the
opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature of
the
interest,
position,
association
or
relationship in question and an explanation
of why the board is of that opinion; and
Complies AGL Board
In accordance to the Board Charter, the majority of the Board should be Independent Directors. Aspen will
regularly review whether each Non-executive Director is independent and each Non-executive Director should
provide to the Board all information that may be relevant to this assessment. If a Director’s independence
status changes this should be disclosed to the Board and explained to the market in a timely manner.
a)
The Directors names and independence is detailed in the Director’s Report of the Annual Report.
The Board has adopted a definition of independence based on that set out in Principle 2 of the ASX
Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations.
b)
N/A

6

(c) the length of service of each director. c)
The length of service is detailed in the Director’s Report of the Annual Report.
RE Board
The names of the RE directors that are considered independent and the years they were appointed are:
c)
The length of service is detailed in the Director’s Report of the Annual Report.
RE Board
The names of the RE directors that are considered independent and the years they were appointed are:
David Grbin 2016
AlexanderCalder 2016
Rupert Smoker (appointed 2016) and Ben Norman (alternate director, appointed 2019) are not considered
independent directors because they are executives of Evolution.
2.4 A majority of the board of a listed entity should be
independent directors.
Complies AGL Board
The majority of the Board’s Directors are considered independent.
RE Board
A majority of RE directors are independent.
2.5 The chair of the board of a listed entity should be
an independent director and, in particular, should
not be the same person as the CEO of the entity.
Complies AGL Board
Clive Appleton is Chairman of the Company and is considered independent. John Carter and David Dixon are
joint Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO’s) of the Company.
RE Board
Thisrecommendation isnot applicable to theRE.
2.6 A listed entity should have a program for
inducting new directors and provide appropriate
professional
development
opportunities
for
directors to develop and maintain the skills and
knowledge needed to perform their role as
directors effectively.
Complies AGL Board
The Board provides material to new Directors to assist them in gaining an understanding of:

Aspen’s financial, strategic, operational and risk management position;

the rights, duties and responsibilities of the Directors;

the roles and responsibilities of the executive management team; and

the role of Board committees.

7

Directors are encouraged to undertake continuing education to update and enhance their skills and knowledge.
RE Board
This recommendation is not applicable to the RE.
PRINCIPLE 3– ACT ETHICALLY AND RESPONSIBLY
3.1 A listed entity should:
(a) have a code of conduct for its directors,
senior executives and employees; and
(b) disclose that code or a summary of it.
Complies AGL Board
(a) The Board has adopted the Code of Conduct to promote ethical and responsible decision making by
Directors, management and employees.
All Directors and employees are expected to act with the utmost integrity and objectivity, striving at all times to
enhance the reputation and performance of Aspen. All Directors and employees who are members of a
professional body are required to comply with their respective bodies’ ethical standards.
The Code of Conduct must be read and agreed at the commencement of employment as part of the employee
induction process. It is an important reference document that outlines the behavioural expectations that Aspen
has of its Directors and employees. The Code is not intended to be exhaustive and cannot anticipate every
situation which may morally or ethically face the employee or Aspen. However, it is intended to provide a
framework for common sense and sound judgement. Compliance with the Code is an obligation owed by all
employees to each other and to Aspen, breach of which will result in disciplinary action or dismissal.
(b) The Code of Conduct is available on Aspen’s website at:http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-
information/corporate-governance/.
RE Board
Forthe purpose ofacting asRE,Evolution has adoptedAspenGroup’s Code ofConduct.
PRINCIPLE 4– SAFEGUARD INTEGRITY IN CORPORATE REPORTING
4.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have an audit committee which:
1.
has at least three members, all of
whom are non-executive directors and
a majority of whom are independent
directors; and
2.
is chaired by an independent director,
who is not the chair of the board;
Does not comply in
full
AGL Board
One of the purposes of the Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee (ARCC) is to assist the Board in fulfilling
its corporate governance role in relation to the integrity of Aspen’s financial reporting, internal control structure,
risk management control systems, compliance with taxation requirements of the ATO and state taxation
bodies, and the internal and external audit functions of Aspen and its controlled entities. ARCC will ensure the
truthful and factual presentation of Aspen’s financial performance and position.

8

and disclose:
3.
the charter of the committee;
4.
the
relevant
qualifications
and
experience of the members of the
committee; and
(b) in relation to each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances of the members at those
meetings;OR
(c) if it does not have an audit committee,
disclose that fact and the processes it
employs that independently verify and
safeguard the integrity of its corporate
reporting, including the processes for the
appointment and removal of the external
auditor and the rotation of the audit
engagement partner.
(a)
1.
The ARCC is appointed by the Board. Due to the small size of the Board, it comprises two members
(instead of 3 members as recommended by the ASX Principles), and does have a majority of
independent Directors.
2.
The ARCC is chaired by an independent Director.
3.
The ARCC Charter is available on Aspen’s website at:
http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-information/corporate-governance/.
4.
The members of the Committee, their qualifications and experience is included in the Director’s
Report of the Annual Report.
(b) The number of meetings held by the Committee are detailed in the Directors Report of the Annual Report.
RE Board
The functions of an audit committee are all undertaken by the full board of the RE with assistance from the
RE’s management. Furthermore, a suite of policies and procedures are implemented to ensure that the APT’s
financial reports are true and fair, and prepared in accordance with high standards of integrity. These policies
are in relation to the engagement of auditors as well as the review of the financial statements.
The RE receives confirmations from personnel involved in the financial reporting and management of APT.
The RE board also receives reports from the external auditors in relation to financial reporting and the
compliance plan for APT. In conjunction with APT, the RE manages the engagement, monitoring and rotation
of independent external auditors.
The biographies, qualifications, and experience of the RE board are set out in APT’s annual financial report.
4.2 The board of a listed entity should, before it
approves the entity’s financial statements for a
financial period, receive from its CEO and CFO
a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial
records of the entity have been properly
maintained and that the financial statements
comply
with
the
appropriate
accounting
standards and give a true and fair view of the
financial position and performance of the entity
and that the opinion has been formed on the
basis of a sound system of risk management and
internalcontrol which is operating effectively.
Complies The AGL Board and RE Board receive confirmation from the joint CEO’s that their declarations for both the
interim and full year financial reporting periods, made in accordance with section 259A of the Corporations Act
2001, are based upon a sound system of risk management and internal control and further that the system is
operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risk.
4.3 A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure
that its external auditor attends its AGM and is
available to answer questions from security
holders relevant to the audit.
Complies A representative of the external auditors attends Aspen’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) and is available to
respond to any security holder queries about the conduct of the audit and the content and preparation of the
auditor’s report.

9

PRINCIPLE 5 – MAKE TIMELY AND BALANCED DISCLOSURE

5.1 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a written policy for complying with its
continuous disclosure obligations under the
Listing Rules; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
Complies AGL Board
(a) Aspen has written policies designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements
and to ensure accountability at a senior executive level for compliance.
The Board has adopted a Disclosure and Communication Policy to ensure that:

All investors have equal and timely access to material information concerning Aspen including its financial
position, performance, ownership and governance;

Aspen announcements are factual, presented in a clear and balanced way, are made in a timely manner
and do not omit material information; and

Aspen provides security holders with information in accordance with this Policy which includes identifying
matters that may have a material effect on the price of Aspen’s securities, notifying them to the ASX,
posting them on Aspen’s website and issuing media releases, all in a timely manner.
(b) The Continuous Disclosure and Communication Policy is available on Aspen’s website at:
http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-information/corporate-governance/
RE Board
The RE has adopted Aspen Group’s Continuous Disclosure and Communication Policy.
PRINCIPLE 6– RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS PRINCIPLE 6– RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS PRINCIPLE 6– RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS
6.1 A listed entity should provide information about
itself and its governance to investors via its
website.
Complies The Board is committed to open and accessible communication with holders of Aspen’s securities. The Board
has adopted a Disclosure and Communication Policy as noted above.
Aspen’s website atwww.aspengroup.com.au has a Shareholder Information section, including a Corporate
Governance subsection where all relevant corporate governance information can be accessed, including
Board and Committee Charters and various corporate governance policies.
All announcements lodged by Aspen with the ASX are available on Aspen’s website. Other information of
relevance to investors is also made available on Aspen’s website, including annual and half yearly financial
reports, distribution history and key dates.

10

The website also contains a link to Aspen’s security registry’s investor centre.
The RE monitors the AGL website for all governance, reporting and other communications published relating
to APT and has jointly adopted various policies relevant which are published on Aspen’s website.
6.2 A listed entity should design and implement an
investor relations program to facilitate effective
two-way communication with investors.
Complies Aspen has an investor relations programme which includes:

issuing regular written security holder communications such as the Interim Report and Annual Report,
which address Aspen’s strategy and performance,

webcasting or making available on Aspen’s website audio recordings of events such as results
presentations;

an option to receive communications directly from Aspen’s share registry;

maintaining a Shareholder Information section on Aspen’s website;

engaging in a programme of scheduled interactions with institutional investors, analysts, and other
stakeholders; and

promoting two-way interaction with security holders, by supporting security holder participation in the
AGM.
The RE monitors AGL’s security holder engagement program for matters relating to APT.
6.3 A listed entity should disclose the policies and
processes it has in place to facilitate and
encourage participation at meetings of security
holders.
Complies Security holders are encouraged to attend and participate in Aspen’s AGM which is usually held in October or
November each year. An explanatory memorandum on the resolutions proposed is provided with the Notice
of Meeting. Security holders unable to attend the AGM are able to lodge a proxy in accordance with the
Corporations Act 2001. Security holders can submit enquiries regarding Aspen, Directors or complaints, via
the website or email [email protected].
The external auditor attends the AGM to answer questions about the conduct of the audit and the preparation
and contents of the Auditors Report.
6.4 A listed entity should give security holders the
option to receive communications from, and send
communications to, the entity and its security
registry electronically.
Complies Aspen uses Link Market Services Ltd to administer the security holder register. Link Market Services provides
the option for shareholder to receive and send communications electronically. Security holders are
encouraged to create an online account via their websitewww.linkmarketservices.com.au.Link Market
Services Ltd can be contacted on 1300 554 474.
PRINCIPLE 7– RECOGNISE AND MANAGE RISK

11

7.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a committee or committees to oversee
risk, each of which:
(1)
has at least three members, a
majority of whom are independent
directors; and
(2)
is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose the charter of the
committee; the members of the
committee; and
(3)
as at the end of each reporting
period, the number of times the
committee met throughout the period
and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings;OR
(4)
if it does not have a risk committee or
committees that satisfy (a) above,
disclose that fact and the processes
it employs for overseeing the entity’s
risk management framework.
Does not comply in
full
AGL Board
Aspen has established policies for the oversight and management of material business risks and discloses a
summary of those policies.
The ARCC assists the Board to establish and review Aspen’s policies on risk oversight and management and
satisfying itself that management has developed and implemented a sound system of risk management and
internal control.
The Board has adopted a Risk Management Policy designed to:

identify, assess, monitor and manage risk; and

identify material changes to Aspen’s risk profile.
Management has instituted a structure that identifies and addresses risks that could have a material impact
on its business. This structure includes Aspen executives working with the Compliance Manager. Risks are
identified and analysed for each area, and suitable reporting is created to address the risks.
It is also a Board function to identify risks in its consideration of strategic matters, and feed such information
into the Risk Management structure.
(a)
1.
The ARCC is appointed by the Board. Due to the small size of the Board, it comprises two members
(instead of 3 members as recommended by the ASX Principles), and does have a majority of
independent Directors.
2.
The ARCC is chaired by an independent Director.
Aspen’s
Risk
Management
Policy
is
available
on
Aspen’s
website
at:
http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder_information/corporate_governance.html.
The members of the Committee, their qualifications and experience is included in the Director’s
Report of the Annual Report.
3.
The number of meetings held by the Committee are detailed in the Directors Report of the Annual
Report.
RE Board
The RE values the importance of robust risk management systems. The RE maintains a comprehensive risk
management program comprising a risk management framework, (inclusive of a risk appetite statement and
risk register), and aBusiness Continuity /Disaster RecoveryPlan. The board oftheRE(comprisingmajority
  • 7.1 The board of a listed entity should: Does not comply in AGL Board (a) have a committee or committees to oversee full risk, each of which: Aspen has established policies for the oversight and management of material business risks and discloses a

  • (1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent summary of those policies. directors; and

  • (2) is chaired by an independent director, The ARCC assists the Board to establish and review Aspen’s policies on risk oversight and management and and disclose the charter of the satisfying itself that management has developed and implemented a sound system of risk management and

  • committee; the members of the internal control.

12

independent members) maintains responsibility for setting the overall risk appetite of the RE and its risk
management framework. Risk Management is a standing agenda item for the RE’s board meetings and is
subject to an annual review.
A Risk Review Committee comprising Evolution executives meets quarterly to review and monitor risks and
consider the RE’s risk appetite, in accordance with a Risk Review Committee charter.
7.2 The board or a committee of the board should:
(a) review
the
entity’s
risk
management
framework at least annually to satisfy itself
that it continues to be sound; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period,
whether such a review has taken place.
Complies AGL Board
(a) The Board constantly monitors the operational and financial aspects of Aspen’s activities and, through the
ARCC, the Board considers the recommendations and advice of external auditors and other external advisers
on the operational and financial risks that face Aspen.
The ARCC and the Board ensures that recommendations made by the external auditors and other external
advisers are investigated and, where considered necessary, appropriate action is taken to ensure that Aspen
has an appropriate internal control environment in place to manage the key risks identified. In addition,
executives investigate ways of enhancing existing risk management strategies, including appropriate
segregation of duties and the employment and training of suitably qualified and experienced employees.
Management is required to report to the Board annually that Aspen has a sound risk management system in
place and that those systems are operating efficiently and effectively in all material respects. The Board is
required to disclose that management has reported the effectiveness of Aspen’s management of its material
business risks.
(b) During the 2020 financial year, a review of Aspen’s risk management framework was conducted and / or
discussed by the Board and ARCC.
RE Board
The RE values the importance of robust Governance, Risk and Compliance management systems and
maintains a current risk register as part of the risk management program. The systems supporting the business
have been designed to ensure the risks are managed within the boundaries of Evolution’s Risk Appetite
Statement and consistent with Evolution’s core values. The RE has a risk management framework in place
which is reviewed annually and approved by the board. The risk management framework has been reviewed
by the RE board during the reporting period.
The Risk Management Framework has been designed in accordance with RG259 and ISO31000:2018.
The declarations under section 295A of the Act provide assurance regarding a sound system of risk
management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation
to financial reporting risks. The RE also receives appropriate declarations from service providers involved in
financial reporting.

13

7.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a) if it has an internal audit function, how the
function is structured and what role it
performs;OR
(b) if it does not have an internal audit function,
that fact and the processes it employs for
evaluation and continually improving the
effectiveness of its risk management and
internal control processes.
Complies AGL Board
The ARCC assesses the need for an internal audit function. At present the Board considers that Aspen is not
of a size nor complexity to justify having a dedicated internal audit resource and that the roles of the existing
management and Committees are presently sufficient to provide control over business functions.
Notwithstanding that a dedicated internal audit resource is not deemed required, during the 2020 financial year
an internal audit function to review the integrity of data flowing to and from the property assets has been
implemented to ensure, among other objectives, key financial and administrative policies are understood and
being adhered to and that there are adequate controls over and attention to key financial tasks.
RE Board
At present the RE Board does not consider that Evolution is at the size or complexity to justify having a separate
internal audit function. Evolution’s management periodically considers Evolutions systems and processes and
where systems or processes are considered to require improvement, these are developed.
7.4 A listed entity should disclose whether it has any
material exposure to economic, environmental
and social sustainability risks and, if it does, how
it manages or intends to manage those risks.
Complies Aspen’s operations are not subject to any significant environmental regulations under either Commonwealth
or State legislation. The AGL’s Board believes that Aspen has adequate systems in place for management of
its environmental requirements and is not aware of any breach of those environmental requirements as they
apply to Aspen.
PRINCIPLE 8– REMUNERATE FAIRLY AND RESPONSIBLY
8.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a remuneration committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority
of whom are independent directors;
and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period,
the number of times the committee met
throughout
the
period
and
the
individual attendances of the members
at thosemeetings; OR
Complies AGL Board
The Board considered that Aspen is not of a size nor complexity to have a separate Remuneration Committee,
hence the disbanding of the Remuneration Committee in February 2016. Remuneration matters are being
considered by the Board as a whole. Information regarding Aspen’s remuneration framework for Directors and
executives is set out in the 2020 Annual Report. The Remuneration Report includes a summary of Aspen’s
policies and practices for the deferral of performance based-remuneration for executives.
Executives and senior employees are remunerated via salary as well as plans providing short and long term
incentives. These plans provide cash and securities as an incentive for high performance.
The Aspen Performance Rights Plan, which was approved by the members on 23 October 2013, prohibits any
Performance Right granted under the Plan being encumbered or used to secure the payment of any monies.

14

(b) if it does not have a remuneration
committee, disclose that fact and the
processes it employs for setting the level
and
composition
of
remuneration
for
directors
and
senior
executives
and
ensuring
that
such
remuneration
is
appropriate and not excessive.
Non-executive Directors do not receive equity or bonus payments.
RE Board
The RE does not have a Remuneration Committee. The fees and expenses which the RE is permitted to pay
out of the assets of APT are set out in the constitution. The RE’s directors and staff are remunerated by
Evolution, not by APT.
8.2 A listed entity should separately disclose its
policies
and
practices
regarding
the
remuneration of non-executive directors and the
remuneration of executive directors and other
senior executives.
Complies AGL Board
The details of the remuneration paid to Directors and Officers is included in the Remuneration Report section
of the Annual Report.
RE Board
Evolution has a staff engagement strategy in place to maintain and attract talented and motivated directors and
employees. This strategy is designed to improve the performance of Evolution.
8.3 A listed entity which has an equity-based
remuneration scheme should:
(a) have a policy on whether participants are
permitted
to
enter
into
transactions
(whether through the use of derivatives or
otherwise) which limit the economic risk of
participating in the scheme; and
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it.
Complies AGL Board
(a) Aspen’s Securities Trading Policy and the Code of Conduct require all Directors, executives and employees
to abide by Aspen’s Securities Trading Policy (Policy). The Policy outlines the circumstances and requirements
for trading in Aspen’s securities by Directors, executives and employees.
Directors, Key Management Personnel and other employees who have access to price sensitive information
will not be able to deal in Aspen securities without obtaining prior approval. The authorisation and dealing
restrictions apply to Aspen securities and any derivative product related to Aspen securities.
(b) The Securities Trading Policy is available on Aspen’s website at:
http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-information/corporate-governance/.
RE Board
This recommendation is not applicable to the RE.

This statement applies to both AGL and the RE. It is current as at 23 October 2020, and has been approved by the board of AGL on 23 October 2020 and the RE on 31 August 2020.

Unless otherwise indicated, APZ’s corporate governance practices were in place for the financial year ended 30 June 2020 and to the date of signing the Directors’ Report.

Various corporate governance practices are discussed within this statement. For further information on corporate governance policies adopted by the Company, refer to our website http://www.aspengroup.com.au/shareholder-information/corporate-governance/.

15