Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ARDEA RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2022

Feb 6, 2022

64421_rns_2022-02-06_939d3937-6193-4a82-b014-9f5fcdd4fec6.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [40 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [344 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Emu Lake Nickel Sulphide Camp Follow-up Program

ASX & Media Release

7 February 2022

  • Emu Lake core holes AELD0002 and 3 at the Binti South Prospect confirmed a highgrade massive nickel-copper-PGE sulphide discovery within an intact felsic footwall contact of what is now termed the Western Ultramafic:

ASX Symbol

ARL

  • AELD0002: 4.80m at 1.44% Ni and 0.09% Cu from 365.9m

Ardea Resources Limited

including 1.10m at 4.78% Ni and 0.16% Cu from 366.9m

(Ardea ASX release 10 June 2021)

Suite 2 / 45 Ord St West Perth WA 6005

  • AELD0003: 2.72m at 5.42% Ni and 0.85% Cu from 391.04m

PO Box 1433 West Perth WA 6872

including 1.23m at 8.22% Ni and 0.55% Cu from 391.04m

(Ardea ASX release 14 January 2022)

  • Historic exploration at the Binti Gossan Prospect located 1km northwest along strike from Binti South within an intact felsic footwall contact of what is now termed the Central Ultramafic:

Telephone

+61 8 6244 5136

  • ELD015: 2.0m at 6.08% Ni and 1.82% Cu from 336.0m ( open at depth ) including 0.6m at 18.82% Ni and 5.57% Cu from 336.3m

Email

[email protected]

(Heron Resources ASX release 26 November 2013)

  • Regionally there are two distinct Kalpini ultramafic units each with a 20km strike within Ardea granted Mining Lease tenure :

Website

www.ardearesources.com.au

  • The Kalpini Eastern Komatiite Belt hosts the Wellington East and Acra North nickel laterite deposits.

Directors

  • The Kalpini Western Komatiite Belt hosts the Emu Lake Nickel Sulphide Camp. There are three well-defined fertile nickel sulphide surfaces at Emu Lake which are characterised by dacite footwalls to the ultramafic flows with aeromagnetics indicating discrete “string of pearls” ultramafic centres (“channels”).

Mat Longworth Non-Executive Chair

Andrew Penkethman Managing Director & CEO

  • Follow-up Drilling

Ian Buchhorn Technical Executive Director

  • There is a valuable historic drill data base focussed almost entirely on the Binti Gossan with the ELD015 Eastern and Central Ultramafics. The Western Ultramafic at Emu Lake was almost undrilled prior to Ardea AELD0002 and 3. An historic Fixed Loop Electro-Magnetic ( FLEM ) survey indicates a large plate in the projected Western and Central Ultramafic contact position, which was assumed to be a non-sulphide conductor and had not been tested (before Ardea in 2021). This contact now becomes a key exploration target that is open in every direction.

Executive Management

Sam Middlemas Company Secretary & CFO

Alex Mukherji Manager Land Access & Compliance

Ardea’s Managing Director, Andrew Penkethman, said :

Mike Miller General Manager Technical Services

“The focus of historic Emu Lake exploration has been at Binti Gossan testing the Central Ultramafic. Ardea’s Binti South discovery on the younger, stratigraphically higher Western Ultramafic surface is 1km southeast along strike.

Issued Capital

There are three well defined Fertile Ultramafic Surfaces as laterally extensive sheets in the Emu Lake Camp which require systematic drill exploration and DHEM aimed at locating high grade Silver Swan style, channel-hosted massive nickel sulphide. A review of legacy data in tandem with recent knowledge gained from Ardea’s Western Ultramafic drilling has confirmed multiple targets with nickel sulphide mineralisation open in every direction. Ardea believes there is ample opportunity to make additional discoveries within their extensive Kalpini tenements and will be following up on this potential as a priority. Key service providers are booked in to commence drilling and DHEM work.”

Fully Paid Ordinary Shares 138,830,219

Performance Rights 4,771,000

Options 4,000,000

ABN 30 614 289 342

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Kalpini Project - Emu Lake Nickel Sulphide Camp

Ardea’s Kalpini Project is located 70km north-east of the City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder and covers 121km[2] on contiguous granted Mining Lease tenure 100%-owned by Ardea (Figure 1).

Regionally there are two distinct Kalpini ultramafic units each with around 20km strike within Ardea tenure:

  • The Kalpini Eastern Komatiite Belt hosts the Wellington East and Acra North nickel laterite deposits containing 75Mt at 0.73% nickel and 0.04% cobalt, for 549.7kt nickel and 32.6kt cobalt (Ardea ASX release 16 June 2021). Aeromagnetics indicate a uniform sheet of ultramafic (lacking discrete volcanic centres). The ultramafics are typical of the Walter Williams Formation style, consisting of a thick 200-600m sheet with olivine orthocumulate upper and lower contacts with middle olivine adcumulate which weathers to nickel laterite. The Eastern Komatiite sits on Kurnalpi Dome granitoid basement and is presumably an older lava flow sequence.

  • The Kalpini Western Komatiite Belt hosts the Emu Lake Nickel Sulphide Camp. There are three well-defined fertile nickel sulphide surfaces at Emu Lake. The volcanics are characterised by a bi-modal co-magmatic suite, with each cycle having a footwall dacite volcanic overlain by ultramafic volcanic flows. Aeromagnetics indicate multiple discrete ultramafic centres. The flows are typically 10-40m thick, with dacite the lower flow and komatiite the upper flow. Massive nickel sulphide typically occurs in the upper dacite and grades up into disseminated nickel sulphide in the basal komatiite. The volcanic morphology is typical of a komatiite thermal erosion setting. The Western Komatiite overlies a thick felsic volcanic sequence (Black Flag Group equivalent) and is presumably a younger flow sequence.

The Emu Lake Camp was discovered during the 1970s “Nickel Boom”. More recent nickel sulphide exploration has included that completed between 2003 and 2011 by Image Resources Limited, Emu Nickel NL and Xstrata Nickel Australasia Pty Ltd. Their key target was the Binti Gossan zone, represented by a 1,200m strike zone of very strong gossan float (weathered expression of nickel sulphide). Drilling identified several high-grade, albeit thin (0.1-0.3 metre) massive nickel sulphide horizons.

==> picture [349 x 351] intentionally omitted <==

The project is located 35km east of the Black Swan Nickel Project (Silver Swan nickel mine), operated by Poseidon Nickel Ltd, within a parallel komatiite belt.

There are close geological similarities between the massive nickel sulphides at Emu Lake and Silver Swan (Ardea ASX release 14 January 2022).

Figure 1: Ardea tenement plan highlighting the location of the Kalpini Project, Emu Lake Nickel Sulphide Camp and nickel mines and deposits in the region. Projection MGA 94 Zone 51.

2

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [529 x 674] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Aeromagnetics for the Kalpini Project showing strongly magnetic Komatiite Belts with historic shallow drill coverage focussed predominantly on nickel laterite mineralisation on the Eastern Komatiite Belt. Projection MGA 94 Zone 51.

3

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [493 x 424] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Three dimensional interpretation of the Binti Gossan and Binti South Prospects, showing the Western Ultramafic (WU), Central Ultramafic (CU) and Eastern Ultramafic (EU). Projection Binti local grid.

Historic drill exploration has focussed entirely on the Eastern Ultramafic ( EU ) and Central Ultramafic ( CU ), with key historic drill-hole being ELD015 with 2m at 6.08% Ni (refer table 1 following). Drill testing of the Western Ultramafic ( WU ) was restricted to minimal “scissor” sections with easterly drill direction. These holes invariably intersected the WU in the depleted saprolite weathered zone. Accordingly, figure 3 above only records the EU and CU horizons at Binti Gossan, with the WU simply not drilled at the depths prospective for nickel sulphide mineralisation.

The EU and CU nickel sulphide surfaces show remarkable continuity and are open north and south and down-dip. Their uniform geometry suggests a sheet-flow environment for the komatiite flows. The discrete flow channels that must be present to have fed the sheet flows are yet to be intersected in Emu Lake drilling. The uniform position, grade and thickness of historic drill intercepts confirms the nickel sulphide fertility of the sheet-flow system.

Ardea commenced exploration of the WU in 2021 with drill-hole AELD0001, testing an off-hole Down Hole ElectroMagnetic ( DHEM ) anomaly from an historic survey of ELD046. This led to the discovery of the AELD0003 nickel sulphides with 2.72m at 5.42% Ni. The Binti South 3D model in figure 3 records the EU and CU with contiguous strike orientation south from Binti Gossan, though the intervening ground is undrilled at depth.

Significantly, Binti South includes as the red shape (Figure 3) the WU with basal nickel sulphide mineralisation as confirmed by AELD0002 and 0003. The Western Ultramafic is now the total exploration focus of Ardea, at both Binti South and Binti Gossan, with additional exploration upside on the CU and EU ultramafic flows with all target zones able to be tested by each drillhole.

4

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Follow-up Program

In “Silver Swan style” nickel sulphide systems (as Emu Lake clearly is), the exploration methodology is to define a fertile nickel sulphide surface within komatiite flows and then identify the flow channel facies of the system, being the optimum setting in which massive sulphides are likely to deposit. The Ardea results for AELD0003 at Binti South and historic drill hole, ELD015, at Binti Gossan confirm an exceptionally fertile system, entirely comparable to that documented for Silver Swan.

The Ardea follow-up strategy is as follows:

1. Three Dimensional Geological Model

  • Having “finger-printed” the Eastern, Central and Western Ultramafic surfaces through multi-element geochemical analysis, these surfaces have been generated as a 3D model (Figure 3), specifically to locate where the Western Ultramafic is untested. Suitable adjoining holes that have stopped in Central Ultramafic and Western Ultramafic Footwall Dacite (as is the common situation) were then selected for deepening (typically 50-100m) to drill-test the Western Ultramafic surface, and more importantly, use the deepened hole as a DHEM platform seeking channel-hosted massive nickel sulphide.

2. Legacy DHEM

  • The AELD0002, 3 massive sulphide targets were generated by industry-leading consultants Newexco through re-interpretation in 2020 of historic DHEM surveys. With the Ardea 2021 discovery, there is now a good control for better ranking the many untested historic anomalies. Newexco will be systematically completing this task to fine tune the planned drill-hole positioning.

3. Drill Program

  • Key historic drill holes were identified and field checked by the Ardea exploration team using a dummy probe to ascertain if clear for DHEM. All reviewed holes were blocked at shallow depths, and so require drill-clearing ahead of the proposed new DHEM survey. The operating strategy will be to use the core rig to clear the historic hole and once clear, deepen the hole to fully penetrate the targeted Western Ultramafic surface.

  • Downhole EM

Modern high powered DHEM is an absolute priority for locating massive nickel sulphide mineralisation and with significant enhancements in this technology over the last decade in particular, Ardea can assess a larger search space than was available to past explorers.

Defined Targets Thus Far

Two initial prospect areas have been defined over an approximate 1.2km of strike, within the hosting 20km Western Komatiite Belt nickel sulphide target zone:

1. Binti South Prospect

  • a. Section 47750N, test the AELD0003 Western Ultramafic some 100m down-dip as a parent hole, and then potentially a 120m wedge to test 50m downdip. Both parent and daughter hole will have DHEM completed to assess any off-hole conductor plates (Figure 6).

  • b. Section 47715N, deepen historic hole ELD046 by 50m (if able to swing south) to test for western ultramafics, and then do DHEM. Significantly, there is up to 0.14% As in the footwall dacite at EOH, with arsenic being a mineralisation pathfinder (refer Figure 5 and table 1 following).

  • c. Section 47650N, deepen historic hole ELD042A, 50m to test for western ultramafics, then do DHEM (Figure 4).

  • d. Section 48050N, deepen historic hole ELD023, 100m to test the WU and the up-dip projection of an undrilled historic EM plate, and then do DHEM (Figure 7).

5

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [517 x 703] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Binti South cross section 47,650mN. Local Binti Grid.

6

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [526 x 713] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Binti South cross section 47,715mN. Local Binti Grid.

7

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [523 x 712] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: Binti South cross section 47,750mN. Local Binti Grid.

8

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [520 x 707] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7: Binti South cross section 48,050mN. Local Binti Grid.

9

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

2. Binti Gossan Prospect

  • a. Section 48,630N, extend ELD015 some 209m to test the Western Ultramafic 100m down-dip as a potential parent hole, and then 120m wedge to test 50m downdip. Both parent and daughter hole will have DHEM completed to assess any off-hole conductor plates (Figure 9).

  • b. Section 48,600N, deepen historic hole ELD037, 50m to test the WU, then do DHEM (Figure 8).

  • c. Section 48,670N, deepen historic hole ELD020, 100m to test the WU, no historic DHEM completed so a DHEM survey is important follow-up (Figure 10).

Next Steps

Ardea have booked in key service providers such as a specialist geological consultant, Newexco, and drilling and DHEM contractors to assist with priority follow-up exploration over the initial targets defined at the Binti South and Binti Gossan prospects (Figure 3 and Figures 4 to 10). Additional nickel sulphide exploration will be planned over the full 20km of prospective strike within the Western Komatiite Belt (Figure 2).

An Exploration Incentive Scheme (EIS) diamond hole (co-funded with the WA State Government) has been approved to test the down plunge extension of AELD0003 (Figure 6).

A suitable core rig with excellent competency in deep directional drilling has been sourced and drill pad preparation arranged.

Updates will be provided as exploration proceeds on the Emu Lake Nickel Sulphide Camp.

10

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [527 x 717] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 8: Binti Gossan cross section 48,600mN. Local Binti Grid.

11

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [511 x 695] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9: Binti Gossan cross section 48,630mN. Local Binti Grid.

12

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [514 x 698] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 10: Binti Gossan cross section 48,670mN. Local Binti Grid.

13

==> picture [35 x 596] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [173 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

TABLE 1 INTERCEPT SUMMARY, BINTI SOUTH TABLE 1 INTERCEPT SUMMARY, BINTI SOUTH
Section Drill Hole
From
To
Width
Ni cog
Lith 1
Lith 2
Host Unit
Ni %
Cu %
Pd g/t
Pt g/t
S %
Cr %
Mg %
Au g/t
Ag g/t
As ppm
47650N
47650N
47650N
47650N
47,715N
47,715N
47,715N
ELD042A
281.95
283.00
1.05
>1.00
ZSMS
Fd/U
CU FW Dacite
ELD042A
345.00
348.00
3.00
>0.5
Uom
Western Ultramafic
ELD042A
393.43
395.00
1.57
>0.5
ZSDS
Fd/U
W1U FW Dacite
including
393.43
393.88
0.45
>1.00
ZSBS
Fd/U
W1U FW Dacite
ELD042A
427.00
431.00
4.00
>0.5
Uoo
W1 Ultramafic
ELD046
338.00
341.00
3.00
>0.5
Uom
Western Ultramafic
AELD0001
270.00
274.00
4.00
>0.5
ZSDS
Uoos
Central UM
AELD0001
336.00
340.60
4.60
>0.5
ZSDS
Fd
WU FW Dacite
including
336.70
337.35
0.65
>1.00
ZSMS
Fd
WU FW Dacite
1.52
0.30
5.75
0.07
5.0
0.97
12,842
0.57
0.04
0.32
0.09
20.1
0.73
0
1.16
0.08
3.13
0.08
6.2
0.85
2,510
2.67
0.11
8.26
0.04
3.7
1.53
5,560
0.51
0.01
1.00
0.11
19.8
0.17
38
0.47
0.03
0.13
0.09
17.6
0.86
2
0.68
0.03
0.28
0.12
0.53
0.13
18.8
0.02
0.48
13
0.76
0.03
0.09
0.04
2.98
0.04
4.9
0.01
0.86
1,806
2.95
0.08
0.24
0.12
14.40
0.05
5.0
0.03
2.70
1,180
47,750N
47,750N
47,750N
AELD0002
366.90
369.70
2.80
>0.5
ZSDS
Uom
Western UM
including
366.90
368.00
1.10
>1.00
ZSMS
Uom
Western UM
AELD0003
296.00
298.00
2.00
>0.5
ZSDS
Uoo
Central UM
AELD0003
391.04
393.76
2.72
>1.00
ZSMS
Fd
WU FW Dacite
2.24
0.10
0.25
0.10
7.42
0.13
13.8
0.02
0.17
4
4.78
0.16
0.47
0.20
16.10
0.09
6.5
0.03
0.46
-10
0.57
0.01
0.16
0.07
0.37
0.13
19.0
0.01
-0.10
10
5.42
0.85
0.58
0.27
20.95
0.11
2.1
0.04
3.01
-3
48,050N
48,050N
48,050N
48,050N
ELD023
292.79
294.00
1.21
>0.5
ZSDS
Fd
CUFW Dacite
including
292.79
293.07
0.28
>1.00
Fd
Fd
CUFW Dacite
ELD047
171.50
172.95
1.45
>0.5
ZSDS
Uoo
Western Ultramafic
including
172.25
172.95
0.70
>1.00
ZSBS
Fd/U
Western Ultramafic
ELD047
392.70
396.30
3.60
n/a
Uom
Western Ultramafic
ELD047
446.20
447.60
1.40
>0.5
ZSDS
Fd/U
CUFW Dacite
including
447.35
447.60
0.25
>1.0
ZSMS
Fd/U
CUFW Dacite
1.53
0.14
5.86
0.14
5.2
0.57
3,243
5.35
0.40
18.80
0.13
0.5
1.54
962
1.02
0.08
4.26
0.12
10.8
0.54
51
1.82
0.15
7.97
0.11
7.9
0.85
18
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.08
14.3
15.58
1,072
1.29
0.09
4.18
0.03
4.9
0.85
5
5.45
0.21
19.35
0.01
1.9
2.48
3

14

==> picture [35 x 596] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [173 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

TABLE 1 INTERCEPT SUMMARY, BINTI GOSSAN TABLE 1 INTERCEPT SUMMARY, BINTI GOSSAN
Section Drill Hole
From
To
Width
Ni cog
Lith 1
Lith 2
Host Unit
Ni %
Cu %
Pd g/t
Pt g/t
S %
Cr %
Mg %
Au g/t
Ag g/t
As ppm
48,600N
48,600N
48,600N
48,600N
ELD016
301.18
301.28
0.10
n/a
ZSDS
F
EUFW Dacite
ELD016
377.07
379.00
1.93
>0.5
ZSDS
Uoo
Central Ultramafic
including
377.07
377.35
0.28
>1.0
ZSMS
F
CUFW Dacite
ELD016
410.00
423.00
13.00
>0.5
ZSDS
Uom
Central Ultramafic
ELD014
194.00
195.00
1.00
>0.5
Uoo
CUFW Dacite
including
194.52
194.65
0.13
>1.0
ZSMS
Fd/U
CUFW Dacite
0.02
3.60
4.49
0.01
1.0
40.00
-5
1.21
0.06
0.04
0.07
2.64
0.13
12.3
-0.22
-5
6.66
0.24
0.23
0.42
13.49
0.04
2.8
1.43
-5
0.48
0.05
0.15
0.06
0.47
0.08
21.8
-0.42
-5
0.82
0.09
0.04
0.01
3.02
0.11
8.9
-0.09
6
5.56
0.18
0.32
0.09
19.65
0.12
2.2
0.50
26
48,630N
48,630N
48,630N
ELD015
336.00
338.00
2.00
>0.5
ZSDS
Fd/U
CUFW Dacite
including
336.00
337.00
1.00
>1.0
ZSBS
Fd/U
CUFW Dacite
ELD015
343.50
345.50
2.00
>1.0
ZSMS
Uoo
Central Ultramafic
ELD017
268.85
269.81
0.96
>0.5
ZSDS
Fd
CUFW Dacite
including
269.50
269.81
0.31
>1.0
ZSBS
Fd
CUFW Dacite
6.08
1.82
0.87
0.46
6.82
0.11
6.9
2.49
3,135
11.82
3.59
1.74
0.92
13.26
0.07
3.3
5.48
5,538
2.63
1.07
3.95
0.24
6.54
0.11
9.6
5.07
2,599
0.47
0.11
2.08
0.02
4.1
0.00
7
1.11
0.14
0.20
0.10
4.58
0.03
3.7
0.00
7
48,670N ELD018
302.57
303.65
1.08
>0.5
ZSBS
Uoo
Central Ultramafic
including
302.57
303.12
0.55
>1.0
ZSBS
Fd/U
Central Ultramafic
1.26
0.17
0.29
0.17
7.10
0.16
11.1
0.00
4
1.78
0.20
0.37
0.26
10.02
0.15
9.6
0.00
13
Uom
olivine mesocumulate
Uoo
olivine orthocumulate
Fd/U
partially assimilated dacite within olivine cumulate flow with sulphide mineralisation
Fd
dacite
ZSDS
nickel disseminated sulphide
ZSBS
nickel semi-massive sulphide
ZSMS
nickel massive sulphide
Arsenic-silver association in footwall dacite alteration or nickel sulphide mineralised surface

15

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Authorised for lodgement by the Board of Ardea Resources Limited.

For further information regarding Ardea, please visit https://ardearesources.com.au/ or contact:

Andrew Penkethman

Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Tel +61 8 6244 5136

About Ardea Resources

Ardea Resources (ASX:ARL) is an ASX-listed resources company, with a large portfolio of 100%-controlled West Australian-based projects, focussed on:

  • Development of the Kalgoorlie Nickel Project ( KNP ) and its sub-set the Goongarrie Hub, a globally significant series of nickel-cobalt and Critical Mineral deposits which host the largest nickel-cobalt resource in the developed world at 830Mt at 0.71% nickel and 0.046% cobalt for 5.9Mt of contained nickel and 380kt of contained cobalt (ARL ASX announcements 15 February, 16 June 2021), located in a jurisdiction with exemplary ESG credentials.

  • Advanced-stage exploration at compelling nickel sulphide targets, such as Emu Lake and Critical Minerals targets within the KNP Eastern Goldfields world-class nickel-gold province, with all exploration targets complementing the KNP nickel development strategy.

==> picture [511 x 275] intentionally omitted <==

Follow Ardea on social media

==> picture [21 x 21] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [25 x 21] intentionally omitted <==

16

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Australian securities laws, which are based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date of this news release.

This forward-looking information includes, or may be based upon, without limitation, estimates, forecasts and statements as to management’s expectations with respect to, among other things, the timing and amount of funding required to execute the Company’s exploration, development and business plans, capital and exploration expenditures, the effect on the Company of any changes to existing legislation or policy, government regulation of mining operations, the length of time required to obtain permits, certifications and approvals, the success of exploration, development and mining activities, the geology of the Company’s properties, environmental risks, the availability of labour, the focus of the Company in the future, demand and market outlook for precious metals and the prices thereof, progress in development of mineral properties, the Company’s ability to raise funding privately or on a public market in the future, the Company’s future growth, results of operations, performance, and business prospects and opportunities. Wherever possible, words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “may” and similar expressions have been used to identify such forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the information is given, and on information available to management at such time.

Forward-looking information involves significant risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from the results discussed or implied in the forward-looking information. These factors, including, but not limited to, the ability to create and spin-out a gold focussed Company, fluctuations in currency markets, fluctuations in commodity prices, the ability of the Company to access sufficient capital on favourable terms or at all, changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls, regulations, political or economic developments in Australia or other countries in which the Company does business or may carry on business in the future, operational or technical difficulties in connection with exploration or development activities, employee relations, the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, obtaining necessary licenses and permits, diminishing quantities and grades of mineral reserves, contests over title to properties, especially title to undeveloped properties, the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drill results and other geological data, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins and flooding, limitations of insurance coverage and the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, and should be considered carefully. Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect the Company’s actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. Prospective investors should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking information.

Although the forward-looking information contained in this news release is based upon what management believes, or believed at the time, to be reasonable assumptions, the Company cannot assure prospective purchasers that actual results will be consistent with such forwardlooking information, as there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, and neither the Company nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any such forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake, and assumes no obligation, to update or revise any such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information contained herein to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by law.

No stock exchange, regulation services provider, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in this news release.

Compliance Statement (JORC 2012)

The exploration and industry benchmarking summaries are based on information reviewed or compiled by Mr. Ian Buchhorn, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Buchhorn is a full-time employee of Ardea Resources Limited and has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Buchhorn has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in this report of the information in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Buchhorn owns Ardea shares.

17

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 1 - Collar Location Data

Collar location data for historic diamond drill holes at Emu Lake.

Drill hole Type Depth
(m)
Tenure Grid Easting Northing RL
(mASL)
Dip
degrees
Azimuth
degrees
ELD003 DD 225 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648103.1 399914.41 428.573 -52 240
ELD004 DD 165 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648471.7 399672.24 433.001 -60 240
ELD009 DD 220 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648608.3 399533.88 432.162 -60 240
ELD012 DD 235 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648608.7 399569.1 432.528 -62 240
ELD014 DD 253 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648582.3 399591.22 432.758 -63 240
ELD015 DD 391 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648683.8 399654.96 433.825 -59 240
ELD016 DD 443 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648649.7 399691.4 434.32 -60 240
ELD017 DD 324 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648627.5 399626.74 433.869 -59 240
ELD018 DD 348 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648680.1 399624.28 433.586 -59 240
ELD019 DD 435 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648732.6 399634.97 433.295 -64 240
ELD020 DD 435 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648710.7 399670.49 433.622 -58 240
ELD022 DD 348 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648598.3 399633.44 434.023 -60 240
ELD023 DD 225 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648137.4 399979.07 431.352 -57 240
ELD037 DD 582 M27/506 MGA94_51 6648671.6 399792.41 433.712 -63 240
ELD042A DD 543 M27/506 MGA94_51 6647861.9 400233.36 427.946 -54 240
ELD046 DD 417 M27/506 MGA94_51 6647880.4 400137.07 427.376 -60 240
ELD047 DD 470 M27/506 MGA94_51 6647983.7 399675.87 424.811 -67 060

Appendix 2 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition, Table 1 report

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section applies to all succeeding sections)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as
down hole gamma sondes, or handheld
XRF instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.

Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.

Historic core drilling by Xstrata.

Samples from NQ sized drill core were sampled on
a nominal 1 to 2 metre basis taking into account
smaller sample intervals up to geological contacts
and massive sulphide zones.
.
Drilling
techniques

Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details.

Diamond core drilling commencing with HQ size and
then reducing to NQ size when fresh rock was
encountered.
Drill sample
recovery

Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.

Drill sample recovery was recorded from diamond
drilling core blocks – no material issues were
reported and apart from some zones of broken
ground, recoveries were consistently greater than
90%.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detailto support

The diamond core was geologically logged by
qualified geologists and recorded in the Ardea
database.

18

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Specifically the data base records olivine cumulate
host rocks (orthocumulate, mesocumulate and
adcumulate lithotypes which with multi-element
geochemistry allows komatiite palaeogeography to
be elucidated).
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation

For all sample types, the nature, quality,
and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.

Samples were prepared and assayed in industry
standard laboratories and significant results
reported to JORC (2012) standards.

Samples were be crushed and ground to nominal
75-micron size.

The samples were split into a pulp fraction for
analysis and a pulp-reject for storage.
Quality of
assay data and
laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness
of the assaying and laboratory procedures
used and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.

Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (e.g., standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks)
and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (i.e., lack of bias) and precision
have been established.

Samples were assayed in an industry standard
laboratory and significant results reported to JORC
(2012) standards.

QAQC samples (blanks and standards) were
inserted.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying

The verification of significant intersections
by either independent or alternative
company personnel.

Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

No independent verification of historic results has
been undertaken at this stage.

Drilling by Ardea has generated results which
support historical interpretations.

All field and laboratory data has been entered into
an industry standard database.

No adjustment to assay data was done.
Location of
data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.

The drill collars were surveyed by GPS which is
considered sufficient for the DHEM survey.

Ardea has needed to locate historic holes from
DHEM resurvey and in all cases such holes were
located within the data base positions.
Data spacing
and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.

Whether the data spacing, and distribution
is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been
_applied. _

Drilling is of an exploration nature and no resource
style drilling requiring specific drill spacing was
undertaken.
Orientation of
data in relation
to geological
structure

Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.

The drilling orientation was designed to intersect the
mineralised lenses at a close to perpendicular
angle.

The Emu Lake stratigraphy based on Eastern
Goldfields nickel sulphide ore genesis models is
overturned. Independent experts notably CSIRO
have confirmed this interpretation.
Sample
security

The measures taken to ensure sample
security.

Sampling was undertaken by professional Xstrata
personnel and reputable laboratories used. No
issues with sample security are reported.
Audits or
reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.

Given the early stage of the exploration results, no
audits or reviews have been undertaken or
considered necessary at this stage.

19

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status

Type, reference name/number, location
and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as
joint ventures, partnerships, overriding
royalties, native title interests, historical
sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time
of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.

The project area locations are shown on Figure 1 and
2 of this report and described in the body of the
report.

The tenure is secure and held 100% by Ardea under
granted Mining Lease, M27/506.

Given the early stage of the exploration no mining
specific applications have been made, but there are
no known impediments (e.g.,overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or
_national park and environmental settings)_to mining in
the tenure.
Exploration
done by other
parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.

The Emu Lake project has been explored for nickel
sulphides since 2003 by Image Resources, Skryne
Hill, Jubilee Mines, Emu Nickel, Xstrata – the majority
of the drilling was undertaken by these companies.
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting, and style
of mineralization.

The Company is seeking Archaean komatiite hosted
nickel sulphide and related deposits in the project
areas, commonly referred to as Kambalda-style.
Drill hole
Information

A summary of all information material to
the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material drill
holes:

Significant intercepts from the Emu Lake drilling have
been provided by Ardea in this release and previous
ASX reports.

The previous owner of Emu Lake reported JORC2012
compliant results to ASX from 2013 to 2016.
Data
aggregation
methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (e.g., cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
short lengths of high-grade results and
longer lengths of low-grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be
shown indetail.

The reported assays are weighted for their assay
interval width.

No cutting of grades has been undertaken.
Relationship
between
mineralization
widths and
intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly
important in the reporting of Exploration
Results.

If the geometry of the mineralisation with
respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.

True width of the reported sulphide zones has not
been attempted during this early stage of reporting.
True width is approximately the same as reported
down-hole width.
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant
discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate
_sectional views. _

Where relevant, a diagram showing the hole positions
relevant for the current phase of exploration is
included in the release.
Balanced
reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and
high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
_Results. _

The reporting is balanced taking into account the
early stage of the exploration and the summary nature
of this ASX report.

20

==> picture [35 x 842] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [174 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Other
substantive
exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but
not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical
survey results; bulk samples – size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test
results; bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.

Historical and more recent surface and down-hole
electromagnetic surveys have been undertaken with
the surveys designed by Newexco geophysical
consultants. The recent results from AELD0003 have
been discussed with Newexco but a formal report has
not yet been received.
Future work
The nature and scale of planned further
work (e.g., tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large-scale step-out
drilling).

Ardea is seeking Archaean komatiite hosted, Silver
Swan and Kambalda-style, nickel sulphide deposits
on its extensive ultramafic tenement holding in the
Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia.

Future work at Emu Lake will include:

An Exploration Incentive Scheme (EIS) diamond
hole (co-funded with the Government) has been
approved to test the down dip/plunge extension of
AELD0003. Drill commencement will be subject to
rig availability.

CSIRO work closely with Ardea and are currently
researching nickel sulphides at Emu Lake. The
findings will help NiS exploration vectoring.

21