AI assistant
ARCHER MATERIALS LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2018
May 6, 2018
64478_rns_2018-05-06_f9a12d07-99f3-4a95-954e-4426a079a33c.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
ASX Announcement (ASX: AXE ) 7 May 2018
Jamieson Tank Manganese Project Exploration Target
Highlights
-
Substantial Exploration Target reported for the Jamieson Tank Manganese Project.
-
Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (EMD) has been made from material grading 12% Manganese.
-
The mineralisation predominantly comprises cryptomelane with the potential for both relatively high metal recovery and the production of EMD.
-
The Exploration Target is based on exploration results from 208 historical drill holes and a robust geological model – extended only 20m beyond both the most northerly and southerly drill sections and to a vertical depth of 100m.
-
The mineralisation is open along the strike and at depth.
-
Jamieson Tank is located adjacent to the Sugarloaf graphite processing facility on the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia with access to critical infrastructure.
Archer Exploration Limited (ASX:AXE, Archer or the Company) is pleased to announce an Exploration Target for its Jamieson Tank Manganese project located near Cleve, South Australia. The project area is located within close proximity to existing power, water and other critical infrastructure.
A review of historical drill results has resulted in the establishment of a maiden exploration target of 15Mt - 25Mt at a grade of 8 - 12% manganese for the Jamieson Tank Manganese Project. Investors should be aware that the potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
The Exploration Target is based on historical drilling, across 208 drill holes, undertaken by Archer (2008 - 2011) and Monax Mining Ltd (2008 – 2012). This historical drilling intersected substantial widths of manganese mineralisation over an extensive area. Follow-up exploration activities planned by Archer including geophysical surveys, drilling (including diamond drilling)
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
and additional metallurgical test work to confirm the historical data and to test numerous other targets along this trend.
Greg English, Executive Chairman said “The calculation of such a large a maiden Exploration Target and the recent successful EMD test work at Jamieson Tank, gives us confidence to undertake further manganese focussed exploration at Jamieson Tank.”
“The Exploration Target, is based on a relatively conservative interpolation of grade and tonnage from historical drill results,” said Mr English.
“Jamieson Tank is ideally situated close to existing rail, power, gas and other significant infrastructure which will aide further exploration and possible project development. The development of this potential EMD project is consistent with Archer’s strategy of pursuing opportunities in the reliable energy space.” said Mr English.
About Jamieson Tank
The Jamieson Tank Manganese Project is 100% owned by Pirie Resources Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Archer. The Jamieson Tank exploration target crosses two separate tenements, Carappee Hill (EL 5920) and Waddikee (EL 5815).
The Carappee Hill portion was initially drilled by Archer in 2008 with follow up drilling under a joint venture between Archer and the manganese miner and processer OM Holdings Limited (ASX:OMH). The Waddikee portion was drilled under a separate joint venture between OMH and Monax Mining Limited (ASX:MOX). Archer purchased the Waddikee tenement from Monax in 2014 and now owns all of the Jamieson Tank Manganese Project.
Previous explorers (including Archer) were looking for high grade manganese that could form the basis of a direct shipping ore operation. Therefore, only higher-grade mineralisation was considered. The highly successful recent metallurgical test work by Archer showed that it may be possible to make a high quality electrolytic manganese dioxide product at Jamieson Tank. The potential for discovering lower grade manganese that is suitable for EMD presents an upside for this project.
Testing of the Jamieson Tank manganese has confirmed its suitability to produce EMD (ASX announcement 23 April 2018).
Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide
While manganese has traditionally been seen as a component in steel alloys, it is the battery applications of Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide (EMD) that are predicted to be the fastest growing segment of manganese production. EMD is a high value manganese product which is a critical component within various applications, especially for lithium ion battery cathode material for electric vehicles.
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
The global battery market is currently driven by the shift from nickel-based fuel cells to EMD based fuel cells. The high demand for EMD based Li-ion fuel cells is the major factor contributing to the growth of the batteries market. The adoption of solar and wind-power systems across the world is also creating demand for high electric storage capacity batteries, which utilise EMD battery technologies.
In addition, EMD is critical for cathodes in modern alkaline and sodium batteries and in new battery technology developments, such as the Zinc-Manganese battery which is anticipated to become the replacement for the not so environmentally friendly lead/acid automotive starting and lighting market batteries. There is also significant potential in the emerging Lithiated Manganese Dioxide (LMD) Battery (which contains 61% Manganese by weight). LMD batteries are currently being used in the Chevy Volt and Nissan Leaf.
Exploration Target calculation and assumptions
The Exploration Target for Jamieson Tank manganese is reported as a range of 15Mt to 25Mt over a grade range of 8 to 12% manganese. Investors should be aware that the potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
An isometric view of the existing drilling in the area of the Exploration Target is summarised in Figure 1. Selected drilling intersections within the area of the Exploration Target are summarised in cross section in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
The Exploration Target:
-
Is determined over a range of metres below the surface, which is greater than the average depth extent (54m) of the drill holes used in the Exploration Target calculation.
-
Does not include any potential manganese mineralisation situated along strike from the last drill section, nor any manganese mineralisation below the 137m RL.
-
Is based on the results from the historical drilling undertaken by Archer and Monax (total of 208 holes for 11,200m drill metres).
The Exploration Target is based on the results from the historical drilling undertaken by Archer and Monax (total of 208 holes and 11,200m drill metres). These holes cover around 6.6km of the Jamieson Tank strike and were drilled at distances of 20 to 25m apart on 200m spaced drill lines. The holes are a mixture of Rotary Air Blast (RAB) and Air Core (AC), with 22 holes exceeding downhole lengths of 70m, with some of the holes ending in manganese mineralisation. A summary listing of Archer and Monax ASX releases relating to the associated exploration activity is appended (Appendix 1).
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
The Exploration Target was calculated using the assumptions shown in Table 1 below:
| Lower Range | Upper Range | |
|---|---|---|
| cumulative width (m) Strike (m) depth (m) SG |
20 6,600 60 1.9 |
20 6,600 100 1.9 |
| Tonnes | 15,000,000 | 25,000,000 |
Table 1: Assumptions used to calculate Jamieson Tank Exploration Target. The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
==> picture [357 x 369] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Jamieson Tank exploration target showing location of historical drill lines and the location of the proposed Sugarloaf graphite processing facility. The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
The density of the material (SG) is theoretical and considered to be conservative. No work has been completed determine the accuracy of the density assumption. It is believed to be conservative estimate due to density work completed on the nearby Campoona gneisses which have a density of +2.
The Exploration Target presents an average grade of between 8 and 12% manganese.
==> picture [425 x 286] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Section 1, Interpretation of steeply dipping mineralisation. The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
Historical drilling
– WMC exploration (1991 1993)
WMC undertook IP, EM magnetics and gravity to define drilling targets at Jamieson Tank during 1991 (Conan-Davies, 1992). A single line of 2.4 km, 100m spaced gravity was surveyed. In early 1993 WMC undertook a 25 hole drilling program for a total of 1,477m of air core and RC drilling. Of this total, sixteen holes (953m) were targeted at geophysical anomalies in the search for base metals, and nine holes (524m) were testing manganese oxide targets. Most of the targets drilled within the area of the Carappee Hill tenement were manganese oxide targets, whilst most drilled outside of the tenement were geophysical targets.
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
The results from the historical WMC drilling were used by both Archer and Monax to assist in the targeting the respective drill programs of each company. This meant that, both Monax and Archer drilled holes adjacent to the WMC drilling and as a result Archer has not included the WMC drill results in the calculation of the Jamieson Tank Exploration Target.
==> picture [393 x 244] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Section 2, Interpretation of flat dipping mineralisation. The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.
– Archer exploration (2008 2010)
Archer actively drilled the Carappee Hill portion of the Jamieson Tank Manganese Project during 2008 – 2010. The drilling in this area was focussed on manganese (southern tip of the Jamieson Tank Manganese Project) and copper-gold (Bender Prospect).
In 2008, two RC holes (CHRC014 and CHRC015) were drilled by Archer to test the vertical extensions to the known manganese mineralisation previously identified by WMC. The best intercept was from hole CHRC014 of 24m @ 12% manganese from 61m.
An 18 hole slimline RC drill program was completed during 4-9 June 2010, as part of the Farmin Agreement between Archer and OM Manganese Ltd (OMM). This drilling program was aimed at testing the extensions to the manganese and iron mineralisation intersected in drilling programs previously conducted by Archer in 2008 and Western Mining Corporation in 1993.
The main lithologies intersected by OMM included Quaternary sands, calcrete and iron laterite near surface, over bedrock, which comprised weathered schist, chert and interstitial bands of manganese oxide.
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
In total, 131 samples were taken for geochemical analysis. Encouraging manganese results quoted at a 10% Mn cut-off include:
| Hole No | From(m) | To(m) | Width(m) | Mn(%) | Fe(%) | P(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JTRC130 | 28 | 33 | 5 | 14.6 | 8.0 | 0.02 |
| JTRC131 | 28 | 30 | 2 | 17.8 | 9.7 | 0.07 |
| JTRC132 | 28 | 30 | 2 | 15.0 | 9.2 | 0.10 |
| JTRC133 | 29 | 35 | 6 | 15.0 | 10.7 | 0.09 |
| JTRC 140 | 37 46 |
39 48 |
2 2 |
18.2 22.0 |
6.7 10.3 |
0.04 0.06 |
| JTRC141 | 33 41 |
38 43 |
5 2 |
13.8 18.8 |
23.8 10.0 |
0.06 0.03 |
Table 2. Abridged summary of June 2010 Jamieson Tank RC drill results.
A summary listing of Archer ASX releases relating to the associated exploration activity is appended (Appendix 1).
==> picture [429 x 316] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4. Location of OMM RC holes with historical drill holes (WMC and AXE)
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
Monax exploration
In 2008 Monax commenced manganese and iron exploration, focussing on the Middleback Jaspilite unit. In 2008 Monax RC drilling at Jamieson Tank and Polinga returned encouraging manganese results. Several intercepts ranging from 1 to 5m of elevated manganese and iron with a peak value from Jamieson’s Tank of 34% Mn over 2m from JTRC036. In 2010 Monax entered a joint venture with OM Manganese Ltd (OMM) and they worked on several manganese prospects including Jamieson Tank, Polinga, Hodgins and Francis Prospects. After programs of geochemistry, IP and RC drilling OMM withdrew from the joint venture in 2012 with the grade of the manganese thought to be too low (<20% Mn) and not amenable to simple upgrading to make a saleable direct shipping ore product.
Previous work undertaken on the manganese at Jamieson Tank (MOX and OMH) was aimed at identifying material that could be beneficiated to a grade greater than 30% Mn, which was considered economic at the time. By 2012, it was believed that the ore present at Jamieson Tank could not do this. At that stage Monax’s exploration focus shifted to graphite.
The mineralisation drilled at Jamieson tank had not been reviewed until 2017, where the volume of the material present and the potential for discovering additional material was appreciated. In the review it was noticed that many holes were not drilled deep enough to “complete” drill sections, where a mineralised interval has been intersected by 2 or more holes providing information about its true width and overall width (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Considerably more drilling is required to understand the manganese mineralisation.
A summary listing of Archer and Monax ASX releases relating to the associated exploration activity is appended (Appendix 1).
Next Steps
During the period Q2 – Q3 calendar 2018, Archer is planning a review of the historical geophysical data (IP surveys, gravity, EM & magnetics) at Jamieson Tank, to better understand its relevance to manganese mineralisation. The Company will also undertake analysis and assay of old drill sample and collect additional geochemical samples for analysis.
RC and diamond drilling at Jamieson Tank to test the Exploration Target and provide additional “fresh” sample for metallurgical test work is unlikely to commence before the end of calendar 2018 as much of the area of the Exploration Target is under crop and Archer will need to wait until all crops are harvested before drilling can commence.
Drilling will be a combination of RC and diamond drilling and will target depths greater than the current drilling to allow Archer to better understand the behaviour of the geology and the orientation of the mineralisation. The current limitation of the drilling does not permit adequate interpretation to allow wire-framing to be undertaken (a necessary step for Resource Estimation).
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
The Jamieson Tank drilling targeted for the end of calendar 2018 will be subject to Archer gaining all necessary land owner and government consents to enter the land to drill and will also be subject to the Company having access to adequate funding to undertake the drilling at that time.
For further information, please contact:
Contact Details
Mr Greg English Executive Chairman Dr Mohammad Choucair Chief Executive Officer
Shareholders
For more information visit our website https://archerx.com.au/investors/
Tel: +61 8 8272 3288
Competent Person Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and an Exploration Target is based on information compiled by Mr Wade Bollenhagen, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is a full-time employee of Archer Exploration Limited.
Mr Bollenhagen has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr. Bollenhagen consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
Appendix 1: Previous and relevant Jamieson Tank ASX Announcements
The following announcements released to the ASX by Archer Exploration Limited (ASX:AXE) and Monax Mining Limited (ASX:MOX) contain results from RC, RAB and auger drilling at Jamieson Tank Manganese Project, SA.
| Date | Title of Announcement |
|---|---|
| Archer Exploration Limited announcements | |
| 25/03/08 | Carappee Hill - Manganese and Iron Potential |
| 11/04/08 | More Promising Outlook for S.A. Manganese Project |
| 11/06/08 | Commencement of Drilling |
| 28/10/08 | Quarterly Activities Report |
| 21/07/10 | Encouragement from Manganese and Iron Projects |
| 13/05/11 | Manganese assay results from recent drilling on EL3711 |
| Monax Mining Limited announcements | |
| 17/06/08 | Monax`s Waddikee Drilling Confirms Manganese Mineralisation |
| 19/09/08 | Highly Encouraging Manganese and Iron Ore Results |
| 18/12/08 | Manganese Beneficiation Results - Waddikee Project |
| 19/01/10 | Waddikee Manganese Project Update |
| 15/03/10 | Waddikee Manganese Project Update |
| 24/06/10 | Waddikee Manganese and Iron Ore Drilling Results |
| 16/07/10 | Final Waddikee Drilling Results |
| 30/07/10 | June 2010 Quarterly Activities and Cashflows |
| 09/05/11 | High Grade Manganese from Waddikee Project |
| 26/05/11 | Revised Exploration Update |
| 05/01/12 | Significant anomaly discovered at Polinga Manganese Prospect |
| 07/05/12 | Manganese and Iron Ore drilling results at Waddikee |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling Techniques |
• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as downhole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
• All work being reported is from 2008 to 2012 undertaken by Monax Mining (ASX:MOX), all inferences made to grades come from assay intervals analysed by Accredited Australian laboratories. • No reference to sample representivity can be made, although the work undertaken was by professional individuals. • The term Mineralisation is applied to material above 4% Mn, with continued metallurgical work, will show that cryptomelane material can be processed to make Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide. • With additional work the methodologies of the analytical processes undertaken can be reported, i.e. the crushing, grinding, digest and analytic method of the sample can be reported. It is believed that since these samples have been analysed within the past 10 years in Australia, that an appropriate NATA laboratory would have been used as the results were reported to the ASX. |
| Drilling Techniques |
• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, bywhat method, etc.). |
• All references are to most holes were drilled as Rotary Air bore (RAB) with a smaller number as Air Core (AC) drilling, from 2008 to 2012. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Drill Sample Recovery |
• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
• The recovery of the sample material is unknown. |
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. • The total length andpercentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
• The chip samples have been logged to a level of detail that could be used in a Mineral Resource estimate. • Logging of the samples was undertaken in a qualitative and quantitative manner, no diamond drilling was undertaken. |
| Sub- Sampling Techniques and Sample Preparation |
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in- situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
• It is understood that all material was riffle split. • Although unknown, it is believed that Monax mining (MOX) would have undertaken the appropriate methodologies of taking the sample and analyses that was standard for the time. • Duplicates do not appear to have been taken. • Sample sizes have not been scrutinised at this stage. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Assay Data and Laboratory Tests |
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
• Unknown at this stage, though the company whom under took the work would have undertaken the appropriate procedures standard for the time. • The use of quality controls is unknown at this time. |
| Verification of Sampling and Assaying |
• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
• No verification has been undertaken at this point in time, this will be undertaken in the future. |
| Location of Data Points |
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar and downhole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
• MGA94 Zone 53 grid coordinate system is used. • A hand-held GPS was used to identify the drill hole location. • Quality and adequacy is appropriate for this level of exploration. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Data Spacing and Distribution |
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
• The spacing of the drill lines is currently 200m apart, which is adequate for an Exploration Target, however it is not for Mineral Resource estimation. • The current line spacing of 200m is too wide for an Inferred Resource Estimation. • No compositing has been applied. |
| Orientation of Data in Relation to Geological Structure |
• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
• The orientation of the drilling appears to be roughly orthogonal to the strike of mineralisation and has not introduced a bias. |
| Sample Security |
• The measures taken to ensure sample security. |
• It is assumed that best practices were undertaken at the time • All residual sample material is stored securely. |
| Audits or Reviews |
• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. |
• None undertaken. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral Tenement and Land Tenure Status |
• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
• Tenement status confirmed on SARIG. • All work being reported is from EL 5815 & 5920 (owned by Pirie Resources Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of AXE). • The tenement is in good standing with no known impediments. |
| Exploration Done by Other Parties |
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
• Western Mining Corp (WMC) undertook drilling in 1994 targeting the Manganese units at Jamieson Tank with a limited RC drilling program. • In 2008 Archer undertook a limited program of 3 holes to test the down dip extensions to the historical WMC drilling on EL 3711 (EL 5920). • In 2009, MOX commenced reporting rock chip samples from EL 5815, with the first drilling undertaken in 2008 and the last holes reported on the 8thMay 2012. |
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
• The Manganese mineralisation is stratigraphically bound with elevated levels of Ba, this indicates a potential distal VMS environment. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Drillhole Information |
• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: – Easting and northing of the drill hole collar – Elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar – Dip and azimuth of the hole – Downhole length and interception depth – Hole length • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
• Monax have reported the drilling in releases dated, 15th March 2010, 24th June 2010, 16th July 2010, 9th May 2011 and 8th May 2012. • Collar information such as Easting, Northing, Dip and Azimuth are reported in these releases along with what was considered significant mineralisation. • For completeness of reporting the details are presented in Appendix 2 of this report. |
| Data Aggregation Methods |
• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearlystated. |
• No weighting of data has been undertaken, all discussion about sample intervals refers to single metre intervals. • No metal equivalents are being used. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship Between Mineralisation Widths and Intercept Lengths |
• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the downhole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘downhole length, true width not known’). |
• No relationship appears to occur between widths and lengths at this stage. • All holes drilled appear to be orthogonal to the strike of the mineralisation. • Any reference to lengths of mineralisation, this is referring to down hole only. |
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
• See main body of report. |
| Balanced Reporting |
• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
• The reporting is considered to be balanced. |
| Other Substantive Exploration Data |
• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminatingsubstances. |
• Considerable historical work was completed with geophysical surveys (IP, EM, gravity and magnetics) over the target area to assist in understanding the mineralisation. This work needs review. • Additional regional targets have not been followed up. |
| Further Work | • The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
• Figures in the body of this report highlight the gaps in the data. • Additional interpretation of geophysical data, reviews and assessments of regional targets and infill/ extensional drilling at Jamieson Tank with a view to report a JORC compliant resource. • Additional and ongoing metallurgical research work to refine the EMDprocess. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Database integrity | • Measures taken to ensure that data has not been corrupted by, for example, transcription or keying errors, between its initial collection and its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes. • Data validation procedures used. |
• No resource is being reported, although there is considerable data, it is insufficient to be used for an Inferred Resource. • Data collection and storage is of a high standard. • No validation has been undertaken. |
| Site visits | • Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person and the outcome of those visits. • If no site visits have been undertaken indicate whythis is the case. |
• The competent person has visited the site. |
| Geological interpretation |
• Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of) the geological interpretation of the mineral deposit. • Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made. • The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral Resource estimation. • The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource estimation. • The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology. |
• There is considerable work to be done to improve the geological model, as such a mineral resource cannot be reported. A lack of structural information prevents and adequate geological interpretation, i.e. diamond drilling will reduce the uncertainty of the geological model. • Broad assumptions are made about the general dip of the mineralisation and its relationship to the stratigraphy and its orientation in the area. • There are a number of faults present in the area that have created off sets in the strike of the mineralisation, the location of these has not been defined by drilling. • A Mineral Resource is not being reported, an Exploration target is reported and geology / mineralogy does guide the wireframing. • Faulting in the area will affect continuity of grade and geology, this is still unknown. |
| Dimensions | • The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below surface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being reported. • A range is presented for the tonnage prediction, based upon the depth extent projected i.e. from 60m to 100m |
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
ABN: 64 123 993 233
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Range | Upper Range | ||||
| cumulative width (m) |
20 | 20 | |||
| Strike(m) | 6600 | 6600 | |||
| depth(m) | 60 | 100 | |||
| SG | 1.9 | 1.9 | |||
| tonnes | 15,000,000 | 25,000,000 | |||
| Estimation and modeling techniques |
• The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters and maximum distance of extrapolation from data points. If a computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a description of computer software and parameters used. • The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mine production records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takes appropriate account of such data. • The assumptions made regarding recovery of by-products. • Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables of economic significance (e.g. sulphur for acid mine drainage characterisation). • In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed. • Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units. • Anyassumptions about correlation between variables. |
• There is no Mineral Resource Estimation being reported. No wireframes have been created, no statistical analysis of the mineralisation has been undertaken, no estimation of the grade has been undertaken into a block model. • An Exploration target is being presented. Simple sectional interpretation has been undertaken on the Mn mineralisation, as such a cumulative width of 20m has been assigned to the sections over a strike of 6,600m. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| • Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the resource estimates. • Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping. • The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available. |
||
| Moisture | • Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with natural moisture,and the method of determination of the moisture content. |
• Only an estimate of 1.9 has been used for the Exploration target, no mineral Resource is beingreported. |
| Cut-off parameters | • The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parameters applied. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being presented |
| Mining factors or assumptions |
• Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum mining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) mining dilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential mining methods, but the assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters when estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the mining assumptions made. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being presented |
| Metallurgical factors or assumptions |
• The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential metallurgical methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being presented. • Test work to determine the validity of the material being discussed being converted into a commercial product was undertaken by a commercial laboratory Kemetco (based in Canada). • Whereby a composite sample grading 12% Mn was leached using SO2, providing a pregnant liquor that was then processed to generate a material called Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide. Future work will be orientated to determine a cut off value for Mn to create this material. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental factors or assumptions |
• Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residue disposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider the potential environmental impacts of the mining and processing operation. While at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, particularly for a greenfields project, may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being presented |
| Bulk density | • Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the assumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the frequency of the measurements, the nature, size and representativeness of the samples. • The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc.), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit. • Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being presented. |
| Classification | • The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into varying confidence categories. • Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors (i.e. relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input data, confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data). • Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being presented. |
| • The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource estimates. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being presented. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Audits or reviews | ||
| Discussion of relative accuracy/ confidence |
• Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and confidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate. • The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include assumptions made and the procedures used. • These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate should be compared withproduction data, where available. |
• No Mineral Resource is being reported an Exploration target is being presented. • Additional drilling is required to improve the confidence in the mineralisation such that a mineral resource can be reported to allow further studies on the EMD potential. |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
Appendix 2: Information for holes drilled for Manganese on the Eyre Peninsula
| Hole_ID | Easting | Northing | Type | Depth | RL | Dip | Azimuth | Date Drilled | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWRC001 | 617174 | 6319197 | RAB | 57 | 200 | -60 | 270 | 26-Mar-11 | Bunora West |
| BWRC002 | 617198 | 6319198 | RAB | 60 | 200 | -60 | 270 | 26-Mar-11 | Bunora West |
| BWRC003 | 617221 | 6319199 | RAB | 60 | 202 | -60 | 270 | 26-Mar-11 | Bunora West |
| CHRC001 | 622600 | 6296040 | RC | 127 | 210 | -60 | 270 | 06-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| CHRC002 | 622809 | 6295938 | RC | 37 | 210 | -60 | 270 | 20-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| CHRC003 | 622819 | 6295932 | RC | 137 | 210 | -60 | 285 | 21-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| CHRC004 | 622991 | 6295847 | RC | 120 | 210 | -60 | 282 | 22-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| CHRC005 | 622962 | 6295864 | RC | 115 | 210 | -60 | 285 | 23-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| CHRC006 | 623024 | 6295835 | RC | 139 | 210 | -60 | 279 | 23-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| CHRC013 | 623151 | 6295785 | RC | 127 | 210 | -60 | 270 | 30-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| CHRC014 | 623077 | 6295660 | RC | 139 | 210 | -60 | 270 | 30-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| CHRC015 | 623112 | 6295568 | RC | 128 | 210 | -60 | 270 | 01-Jul-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| FRC001 | 630560 | 6311913 | RC | 163 | 283 | -90 | 0 | 27-Mar-13 | Francis |
| HRC001 | 617702 | 6323805 | RAB | 60 | 206.77 | -60 | 270 | 26-Mar-11 | Hodgins |
| HRC002 | 617722 | 6323802 | RAB | 60 | 207.89 | -60 | 270 | 30-Mar-11 | Hodgins |
| HRC003 | 617671 | 6323800 | RAB | 55 | 205.53 | -60 | 270 | 30-Mar-11 | Hodgins |
| HRC004 | 617649 | 6323800 | RAB | 45 | 203.93 | -60 | 270 | 31-Mar-11 | Hodgins |
| HRC005 | 617659 | 6323801 | RAB | 56 | 203.93 | -60 | 90 | 31-Mar-11 | Hodgins |
| HRC006 | 617762 | 6323800 | RAB | 25 | 208.61 | -60 | 270 | 31-Mar-11 | Hodgins |
| HRC007 | 617645 | 6323750 | RC | 52 | 198 | -60 | 270 | 26-Mar-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC008 | 617668 | 6323750 | RC | 51 | 210 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC009 | 617707 | 6323750 | RC | 51 | 201 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC010 | 617724 | 6323750 | RC | 51 | 217 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC011 | 617552 | 6323023 | AC | 46 | 192 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC012 | 617599 | 6323027 | RC | 60 | 199 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC013 | 617651 | 6323027 | AC | 27 | 203 | -60 | 270 | 28-Mar-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC014 | 617804 | 6324252 | RAB | 42 | 198 | -60 | 270 | 02-Apr-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC015 | 617828 | 6324251 | RAB | 50 | 197 | -60 | 270 | 02-Apr-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC016 | 617850 | 6324247 | RAB | 30 | 194 | -60 | 270 | 02-Apr-12 | Hodgins |
| HRC017 | 617875 | 6324250 | AC | 30 | 200 | -60 | 270 | 02-Apr-12 | Hodgins |
| JTRC001 | 622358 | 6296608 | RC | 43 | 248 | -60 | 290 | 21-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC002 | 622379 | 6296594 | RC | 67 | 250 | -60 | 290 | 21-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC003 | 622400 | 6296586 | RC | 85 | 250 | -60 | 290 | 24-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC004 | 622411 | 6296778 | RC | 49 | 251 | -60 | 290 | 29-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC005 | 622433 | 6296768 | RC | 67 | 250 | -60 | 290 | 29-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC006 | 622454 | 6296759 | RC | 85 | 251 | -60 | 290 | 27-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC007 | 622473 | 6296750 | RC | 109 | 252 | -60 | 290 | 25-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC008 | 622494 | 6296740 | RC | 97 | 255 | -60 | 290 | 30-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC009 | 622518 | 6296730 | RC | 55 | 251 | -60 | 290 | 30-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC010 | 622533 | 6296722 | RC | 25 | 253 | -60 | 290 | 31-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC011 | 623151 | 6298056 | RC | 49 | 259 | -60 | 290 | 31-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC012 | 623172 | 6298047 | RC | 67 | 259 | -60 | 290 | 31-May-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC013 | 623195 | 6298040 | RC | 79 | 256 | -60 | 290 | 01-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC014 | 623216 | 6298029 | RC | 92 | 263 | -60 | 290 | 01-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole_ID | Easting | Northing | Type | Depth | RL | Dip | Azimuth | Date Drilled | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JTRC015 | 623236 | 6298022 | RC | 91 | 259 | -60 | 290 | 02-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC016 | 623723 | 6298047 | RC | 49 | 272 | -60 | 290 | 03-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC017 | 623742 | 6298035 | RC | 49 | 272 | -60 | 290 | 03-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC018 | 623762 | 6298025 | RC | 49 | 271 | -60 | 290 | 03-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC019 | 623782 | 6298013 | RC | 67 | 270 | -60 | 290 | 03-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC020 | 623802 | 6298002 | RC | 61 | 269 | -60 | 290 | 03-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC021 | 623815 | 6297995 | RC | 37 | 273 | -60 | 290 | 03-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC022 | 623836 | 6297982 | RC | 67 | 273 | -60 | 290 | 04-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC023 | 623902 | 6298115 | RC | 49 | 272 | -60 | 290 | 04-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC024 | 623923 | 6298105 | RC | 67 | 276 | -60 | 290 | 04-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC025 | 623944 | 6298095 | RC | 43 | 275 | -60 | 290 | 04-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC026 | 623965 | 6298085 | RC | 37 | 277 | -60 | 290 | 05-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC027 | 623987 | 6298075 | RC | 49 | 278 | -60 | 290 | 05-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC028 | 624004 | 6298066 | RC | 85 | 279 | -60 | 290 | 05-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC029 | 624035 | 6298499 | RC | 79 | 268 | -60 | 290 | 05-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC030 | 624043 | 6298495 | RC | 49 | 271 | -60 | 290 | 06-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC031 | 624051 | 6298490 | RC | 55 | 271 | -60 | 290 | 06-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC032 | 624054 | 6298490 | RC | 55 | 273 | -90 | 0 | 06-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC033 | 624038 | 6298470 | RC | 49 | 273 | -60 | 290 | 08-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC034 | 624046 | 6298466 | RC | 49 | 273 | -60 | 290 | 09-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC035 | 624048 | 6298492 | RC | 30 | 273 | -60 | 20 | 09-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC036 | 623609 | 6297159 | RC | 55 | 284 | -60 | 110 | 10-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC037 | 623588 | 6297169 | RC | 55 | 285 | -60 | 110 | 10-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC038 | 623565 | 6297181 | RC | 61 | 283 | -60 | 110 | 11-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC039 | 623546 | 6297192 | RC | 25 | 284 | -60 | 110 | 11-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC040 | 623124 | 6298001 | RC | 49 | 259 | -60 | 290 | 11-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC041 | 623144 | 6297991 | RC | 49 | 261 | -60 | 290 | 11-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC042 | 623163 | 6297980 | RC | 55 | 263 | -60 | 290 | 12-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC043 | 623183 | 6297970 | RC | 85 | 264 | -60 | 290 | 12-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC044 | 623204 | 6297960 | RC | 85 | 265 | -60 | 290 | 12-Jun-08 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC045 | 623901 | 6298901 | RC | 44 | 244 | -60 | 270 | 06-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC046 | 623925 | 6298903 | RC | 48 | 244 | -60 | 270 | 06-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC047 | 623952 | 6298903 | AC | 39 | 244 | -60 | 270 | 07-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC048 | 623962 | 6298904 | AC | 31 | 244 | -60 | 270 | 07-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC049 | 623952 | 6298701 | RC | 52 | 251 | -60 | 270 | 07-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC050 | 623973 | 6298704 | RAB | 49 | 257 | -60 | 270 | 08-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC051 | 623999 | 6298702 | RAB | 64 | 265 | -60 | 270 | 08-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC052 | 624029 | 6298443 | RAB | 58 | 281 | -60 | 270 | 08-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC053 | 624055 | 6298442 | RAB | 40 | 280 | -60 | 270 | 08-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC054 | 624056 | 6298443 | RAB | 46 | 280 | -90 | 0 | 08-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC055 | 623960 | 6298431 | RAB | 49 | 273 | -60 | 270 | 09-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC056 | 623933 | 6298431 | RAB | 46 | 272 | -60 | 270 | 09-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC057 | 623909 | 6298433 | RAB | 46 | 271 | -60 | 270 | 09-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC058 | 623985 | 6298431 | RAB | 79 | 273 | -60 | 270 | 09-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC059 | 623849 | 6298101 | RAB | 69 | 269 | -60 | 270 | 09-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole_ID | Easting | Northing | Type | Depth | RL | Dip | Azimuth | Date Drilled | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JTRC060 | 623873 | 6298100 | RAB | 70 | 270 | -60 | 270 | 11-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC061 | 623898 | 6298100 | RAB | 64 | 271 | -60 | 270 | 11-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC062 | 623723 | 6297901 | RAB | 49 | 275 | -60 | 270 | 11-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC063 | 623749 | 6297902 | RAB | 45 | 271 | -60 | 270 | 11-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC064 | 623773 | 6297899 | RAB | 58 | 267 | -60 | 270 | 11-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC065 | 623798 | 6297898 | RAB | 58 | 265 | -60 | 270 | 11-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC066 | 623874 | 6297900 | RAB | 58 | 271 | -60 | 270 | 11-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC067 | 623900 | 6297897 | RAB | 55 | 274 | -60 | 270 | 12-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC068 | 623924 | 6297899 | RAB | 52 | 279 | -60 | 270 | 12-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC069 | 623949 | 6297899 | RAB | 55 | 280 | -60 | 270 | 12-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC070 | 623976 | 6297901 | RAB | 52 | 283 | -60 | 270 | 12-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC071 | 623816 | 6297900 | RAB | 58 | 274 | -60 | 270 | 12-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC072 | 623672 | 6297700 | RAB | 50 | 262 | -60 | 270 | 12-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC073 | 623698 | 6297701 | RAB | 53 | 263 | -60 | 270 | 13-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC074 | 623723 | 6297699 | RAB | 56 | 269 | -60 | 270 | 13-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC075 | 623750 | 6297700 | RAB | 50 | 271 | -60 | 270 | 13-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC076 | 623802 | 6297702 | RAB | 49 | 272 | -60 | 270 | 13-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC077 | 623822 | 6297701 | RAB | 53 | 273 | -60 | 270 | 13-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC078 | 623849 | 6297704 | RAB | 58 | 267 | -60 | 270 | 14-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC079 | 623872 | 6297698 | RAB | 46 | 270 | -60 | 270 | 14-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC080 | 623388 | 6297503 | RAB | 61 | 268 | -60 | 270 | 14-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC081 | 623416 | 6297502 | RAB | 58 | 264 | -60 | 270 | 14-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC082 | 623599 | 6297501 | RAB | 52 | 268 | -60 | 270 | 14-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC083 | 623625 | 6297500 | RAB | 70 | 250 | -60 | 270 | 15-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC084 | 623648 | 6297501 | RAB | 61 | 253 | -60 | 270 | 15-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC085 | 623675 | 6297504 | RAB | 72 | 271 | -60 | 270 | 15-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC086 | 623726 | 6297502 | RC | 47 | 272 | -60 | 270 | 15-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC087 | 623750 | 6297500 | RAB | 73 | 269 | -60 | 270 | 17-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC088 | 623775 | 6297500 | RAB | 73 | 277 | -60 | 270 | 17-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC089 | 623798 | 6297505 | RAB | 73 | 280 | -60 | 270 | 17-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC090 | 623351 | 6297301 | RAB | 67 | 269 | -60 | 270 | 17-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC091 | 623374 | 6297299 | RAB | 61 | 276 | -60 | 270 | 18-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC092 | 623493 | 6297301 | RAB | 55 | 278 | -60 | 270 | 18-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC093 | 623524 | 6297301 | RAB | 58 | 287 | -60 | 270 | 18-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC094 | 623552 | 6297303 | RAB | 70 | 285 | -60 | 270 | 18-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC095 | 623572 | 6297304 | RAB | 67 | 274 | -60 | 270 | 18-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC096 | 623601 | 6297303 | RAB | 58 | 277 | -60 | 270 | 19-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC097 | 623624 | 6297302 | RAB | 47 | 274 | -60 | 270 | 19-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC098 | 623649 | 6297301 | RAB | 43 | 274 | -60 | 270 | 19-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC099 | 623675 | 6297301 | RAB | 49 | 271 | -60 | 270 | 19-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC100 | 623700 | 6297301 | RAB | 64 | 272 | -60 | 270 | 19-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC101 | 623724 | 6297300 | RAB | 61 | 273 | -60 | 270 | 20-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC102 | 623299 | 6297098 | RAB | 55 | 264 | -60 | 270 | 20-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC103 | 623326 | 6297102 | RAB | 52 | 266 | -60 | 270 | 20-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC104 | 623448 | 6297101 | RAB | 61 | 279 | -60 | 270 | 20-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole_ID | Easting | Northing | Type | Depth | RL | Dip | Azimuth | Date Drilled | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JTRC105 | 623473 | 6297101 | RAB | 23 | 280 | -60 | 270 | 20-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC106 | 623496 | 6297100 | RAB | 43 | 280 | -60 | 270 | 20-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC107 | 623524 | 6297101 | RAB | 49 | 279 | -60 | 270 | 21-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC108 | 623548 | 6297103 | RAB | 86 | 279 | -60 | 270 | 21-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC109 | 623577 | 6297101 | RAB | 40 | 274 | -60 | 270 | 27-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC110 | 623601 | 6297103 | RAB | 40 | 274 | -60 | 270 | 27-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC111 | 623624 | 6297100 | RAB | 52 | 273 | -60 | 270 | 27-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC112 | 623654 | 6297101 | RAB | 25 | 267 | -60 | 270 | 29-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC113 | 623398 | 6296900 | RAB | 61 | 265 | -60 | 270 | 29-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC114 | 623428 | 6296902 | RAB | 70 | 265 | -60 | 270 | 29-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC115 | 623451 | 6296901 | RAB | 58 | 266 | -60 | 270 | 29-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC116 | 623469 | 6296900 | RAB | 58 | 266 | -60 | 270 | 29-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC117 | 623498 | 6296900 | RAB | 61 | 267 | -60 | 270 | 30-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC118 | 623525 | 6296902 | RAB | 58 | 267 | -60 | 270 | 30-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC119 | 623552 | 6296903 | RAB | 61 | 266 | -60 | 270 | 30-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC120 | 623574 | 6296902 | RAB | 70 | 265 | -60 | 270 | 30-May-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC121 | 623600 | 6296902 | RAB | 61 | 263 | -60 | 270 | 02-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC122 | 623625 | 6296903 | RAB | 50 | 263 | -60 | 270 | 02-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC123 | 623651 | 6296904 | RAB | 50 | 263 | -60 | 270 | 02-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC124 | 623337 | 6296632 | RAB | 58 | 244 | -60 | 270 | 03-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC125 | 623367 | 6296637 | RAB | 58 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 03-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC126 | 623429 | 6296640 | RAB | 48 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 03-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC127 | 623449 | 6296639 | RAB | 28 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 04-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC128 | 623227 | 6296299 | RAB | 52 | 242 | -60 | 270 | 04-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC129 | 623251 | 6296300 | AC | 42 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 05-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC130 | 623275 | 6296300 | AC | 48 | 244 | -60 | 270 | 05-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC131 | 623300 | 6296302 | AC | 30.5 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 05-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC132 | 623326 | 6296304 | AC | 35 | 246 | -60 | 270 | 05-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC133 | 623312 | 6296301 | AC | 36 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 05-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC134 | 623150 | 6296102 | AC | 51 | 249 | -60 | 270 | 06-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC135 | 623174 | 6296102 | AC | 37 | 249 | -60 | 270 | 06-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC136 | 623199 | 6296101 | AC | 46 | 249 | -60 | 270 | 06-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC137 | 623224 | 6296101 | AC | 53 | 250 | -60 | 270 | 07-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC138 | 623249 | 6296100 | AC | 46 | 251 | -60 | 270 | 07-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC139 | 623101 | 6295900 | AC | 51 | 247 | -60 | 270 | 07-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC140 | 623124 | 6295899 | AC | 51 | 248 | -60 | 270 | 07-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC141 | 623148 | 6295901 | AC | 45 | 248 | -60 | 270 | 08-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC142 | 623176 | 6295900 | AC | 46 | 249 | -60 | 270 | 08-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC143 | 623045 | 6295900 | AC | 15 | 247 | -60 | 270 | 08-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC144 | 622951 | 6295500 | AC | 21 | 254 | -60 | 270 | 08-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC145 | 622973 | 6295500 | AC | 33 | 255 | -60 | 270 | 08-Jun-10 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC146 | 621423 | 6293050 | AC | 49 | 240 | -60 | 270 | 04-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC147 | 621450 | 6293051 | RAB | 59 | 232 | -60 | 270 | 04-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC148 | 621473 | 6293048 | AC | 54 | 236 | -60 | 270 | 05-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC149 | 621499 | 6293049 | RAB | 40 | 241 | -60 | 270 | 05-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole_ID | Easting | Northing | Type | Depth | RL | Dip | Azimuth | Date Drilled | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JTRC150 | 621527 | 6293048 | RAB | 46 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 05-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC151 | 621550 | 6293047 | RAB | 49 | 240 | -60 | 270 | 05-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC152 | 621575 | 6293049 | RAB | 43 | 240 | -60 | 270 | 06-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC153 | 621599 | 6293050 | RAB | 16 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 06-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC153A | 621600 | 6293050 | RAB | 60 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 09-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC154 | 621624 | 6293048 | RAB | 60 | 242 | -60 | 270 | 09-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC155 | 621651 | 6293050 | RAB | 60 | 240 | -90 | 270 | 09-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC156 | 621675 | 6293048 | RAB | 60 | 240 | -60 | 270 | 09-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC157 | 621700 | 6293050 | RAB | 61 | 237 | -60 | 270 | 09-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC158 | 621722 | 6293049 | RAB | 60 | 234 | -60 | 270 | 10-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC159 | 621750 | 6293049 | RAB | 60 | 240 | -60 | 270 | 10-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC160 | 621777 | 6293050 | AC | 60 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 10-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC161 | 622198 | 6294075 | AC | 37 | 242 | -60 | 270 | 10-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC162 | 622225 | 6294079 | RC | 54 | 237 | -60 | 270 | 11-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC163 | 622254 | 6294075 | RAB | 60 | 241 | -60 | 270 | 11-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC164 | 622275 | 6294077 | RAB | 60 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 11-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC165 | 622296 | 6294076 | RAB | 19 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 11-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC165A | 622296 | 6294076 | RAB | 52 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 11-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC166 | 622324 | 6294076 | RAB | 52 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 14-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC167 | 622350 | 6294075 | RAB | 60 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 18-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC168 | 622375 | 6294079 | RAB | 58 | 246 | -60 | 270 | 18-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC169 | 622351 | 6294799 | RAB | 54 | 237 | -60 | 270 | 20-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC170 | 622372 | 6294794 | RAB | 60 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 20-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC171 | 622402 | 6294799 | RAB | 52 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 20-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC172 | 622427 | 6294798 | RAB | 50 | 240 | -60 | 270 | 20-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC173 | 622450 | 6294802 | RAB | 60 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC174 | 622475 | 6294802 | RAB | 66 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC175 | 622494 | 6294803 | RAB | 61 | 252 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC176 | 622526 | 6294803 | RAB | 60 | 252 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC177 | 622550 | 6294798 | RAB | 42 | 249 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC178 | 622575 | 6294800 | RAB | 49 | 244 | -60 | 270 | 22-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC179 | 622600 | 6294797 | RAB | 66 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 22-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC180 | 622628 | 6294802 | RAB | 60 | 249 | -60 | 270 | 22-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC181 | 622654 | 6294803 | RAB | 60 | 255 | -60 | 270 | 22-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC182 | 622849 | 6295192 | RAB | 60 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 20-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC183 | 622827 | 6295200 | RAB | 60 | 250 | -60 | 270 | 19-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC184 | 622799 | 6295198 | RAB | 60 | 243 | -60 | 270 | 19-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC185 | 622948 | 6295396 | RAB | 60 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 19-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC186 | 622975 | 6295397 | RAB | 60 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 19-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC187 | 623001 | 6295396 | RAB | 60 | 246 | -60 | 270 | 19-Mar-11 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC188 | 622178 | 6294708 | RC | 31 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 22-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC189 | 622203 | 6294703 | RC | 39 | 234 | -60 | 270 | 22-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC190 | 622222 | 6294703 | RC | 49 | 233 | -60 | 270 | 22-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC191 | 622246 | 6294700 | RC | 49 | 236 | -60 | 270 | 23-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC192 | 622420 | 6298198 | RC | 61 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 28-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole_ID | Easting | Northing | Type | Depth | RL | Dip | Azimuth | Date Drilled | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JTRC193 | 622475 | 6298200 | RC | 51 | 239 | -60 | 270 | 29-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC194 | 622526 | 6298202 | RC | 51 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 29-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC195 | 623120 | 6298392 | RC | 51 | 235 | -60 | 270 | 29-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC196 | 623147 | 6298403 | AC | 51 | 247 | -60 | 270 | 29-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC197 | 623173 | 6298403 | RC | 51 | 247 | -60 | 270 | 30-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC198 | 624004 | 6299048 | RC | 51 | 258 | -60 | 270 | 30-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC199 | 624043 | 6299048 | RC | 46 | 259 | -60 | 270 | 31-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC200 | 624000 | 6297707 | RC | 51 | 271 | -60 | 270 | 31-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC201 | 621778 | 6293802 | AC | 45 | 231 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC202 | 621795 | 6293804 | AC | 42 | 230 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC203 | 621822 | 6293805 | AC | 51 | 233 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC204 | 621844 | 6293804 | AC | 51 | 231 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC205 | 621868 | 6293806 | RC | 49 | 234 | -60 | 270 | 21-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| JTRC206 | 621900 | 6293803 | AC | 60 | 237 | -60 | 270 | 22-Mar-12 | Jamieson Tank |
| LRC001 | 629360 | 6317919 | RC | 67 | 271 | -60 | 225 | 17-Jun-08 | Lambell |
| PRC001 | 621044 | 6303758 | RC | 85 | 224 | -60 | 215 | 13-Jun-08 | Polinga |
| PRC002 | 620945 | 6303839 | RC | 37 | 224 | -60 | 215 | 14-Jun-08 | Polinga |
| PRC003 | 620927 | 6303782 | RC | 58 | 224 | -60 | 40 | 14-Jun-08 | Polinga |
| PRC004 | 620608 | 6304051 | RC | 55 | 228 | -60 | 40 | 16-Jun-08 | Polinga |
| PRC005 | 620993 | 6303689 | RAB | 60 | 213 | -60 | 90 | 30-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC006 | 620907 | 6303760 | RAB | 55 | 223 | -60 | 90 | 29-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC007 | 620886 | 6303759 | RAB | 60 | 224 | -60 | 90 | 28-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC008 | 620937 | 6303735 | RAB | 59 | 218 | -60 | 90 | 29-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC009 | 620913 | 6303735 | RAB | 40 | 221 | -60 | 90 | 29-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC010 | 620971 | 6303713 | RAB | 60 | 225 | -60 | 90 | 29-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC011 | 620946 | 6303711 | RAB | 60 | 216 | -60 | 90 | 29-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC012 | 620639 | 6304099 | RAB | 60 | 230 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC013 | 620665 | 6304099 | RAB | 60 | 230 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC014 | 620687 | 6304100 | RAB | 58 | 228 | -60 | 270 | 28-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC015 | 620805 | 6303948 | RAB | 60 | 225 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC016 | 620824 | 6303950 | RAB | 60 | 226 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC017 | 620849 | 6303950 | RAB | 57 | 229 | -60 | 270 | 27-Mar-11 | Polinga |
| PRC018 | 620196 | 6304803 | RC | 60 | 236 | -60 | 270 | 23-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC019 | 620176 | 6304800 | RC | 66 | 238 | -60 | 270 | 24-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC020 | 620224 | 6304800 | RC | 48 | 249 | -60 | 270 | 24-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC021 | 620272 | 6304803 | RC | 49 | 246 | -60 | 270 | 24-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC022 | 620323 | 630482 | RC | 40 | 245 | -60 | 270 | 25-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC023 | 620928 | 6303501 | AC | 60 | 216 | -60 | 270 | 25-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC024 | 620952 | 6303504 | AC | 51 | 221 | -60 | 270 | 25-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC025 | 620978 | 6303505 | AC | 67 | 216 | -60 | 270 | 25-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC026 | 621001 | 6303503 | AC | 70 | 210 | -60 | 270 | 26-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC027 | 621029 | 6303501 | AC | 66 | 214 | -60 | 270 | 26-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC028 | 620977 | 6303301 | RAB | 32 | 215 | -60 | 270 | 31-Mar-12 | Polinga |
| PRC029 | 621050 | 6303303 | RAB | 72 | 208 | -60 | 270 | 01-Apr-12 | Polinga |
| PRC030 | 621025 | 6303300 | RAB | 58 | 215 | -60 | 270 | 01-Apr-12 | Polinga |
ABN: 64 123 993 233
==> picture [157 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole_ID | Easting | Northing | Type | Depth | RL | Dip | Azimuth | Date Drilled | Prospect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRC031 | 621005 | 6303300 | RAB | 81 | 216 | -60 | 270 | 01-Apr-12 | Polinga |
| PRC032 | 620950 | 6303299 | AC | 66 | 216 | -60 | 270 | 02-Apr-12 | Polinga |