Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ANDEAN SILVER LIMITED Governance Information 2021

Sep 27, 2021

64433_rns_2021-09-27_f2ec8dfe-74a4-4d36-8430-dd988d067a1e.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [206 x 42] intentionally omitted <==

Corporate Governance Statement

Mitre Mining Corporation Limited ( Company )

The Board of Directors of the Company ( Board ) are committed to achieving and maintaining high standards of performance and corporate governance.

The Company supports the 4[th] Edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations ( Recommendations ).

The Company's practices are largely consistent with the Recommendations. The Board considers that the implementation of a small number of Recommendations is not appropriate, for the reasons set out below in relation to the items concerned. The Board uses its best endeavours to ensure that exceptions to the Recommendations do not have a negative impact on the Company and the best interests of shareholders as a whole.

The directors of the Company ( Directors , being either Non-Executive Directors or Managing Directors) are responsible to the shareholders for the performance of the Company in both the short and the longer term and seek to balance sometimes competing objectives in the best interests of the Company as a whole. Their focus is to enhance the interests of shareholders and other key stakeholders and to ensure the Company is properly managed.

As required by the ASX Listing Rules, the Company's main corporate governance policies and practices are summarised below, having regard to the Recommendations. Details of the Company's corporate governance plan and related documents are available online at mitremining.com.au.

This corporate governance statement is current as at 13 August 2021 and has been approved by the Board.

Page 1

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Principle 1 - Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
Recommendation 1.1
A listed entity should have and disclose a board charter setting
out:
(a)
the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and
management; and
(b)
those matters expressly reserved to the board and
those delegated to management.
Yes The Board has adopted a formal charter that details the functions and
responsibilities of the Board and management (Board Charter).
As provided for in the Board Charter, the Board is responsible for all
matters relating to the running of the Company, and more specifically, all
matters relating to the policies, practices, management and operations of
the Company. In addition to decisions requiring approval pursuant to the
respective Committee Charters, the following decisions must be approved
by the Board:
(a)
Directors acquiring or selling shares of the Company
(b)
issuing shares of the Company;
(c)
acquiring, selling or otherwise disposing of property in excess of
the amount set out in the Company's approval matrix;
(d)
founding, acquiring or selling subsidiaries of or any company
within the Company, participating in other companies, or
dissolving or selling the Company's participation in other
companies (including project joint ventures);
(e)
acquiring or selling patent rights, rights in registered trademarks,
licences or other intellectual property rights of the Company;
(f)
founding, dissolving or relocating branch offices or other offices,
plants and facilities;
(g)
starting new business activities, terminating existing business
activities or initiating major changes to the field of the Company's
business activities;
(h)
approving and/or altering the annual business plan (including
financial planning) for the Company or any part of the Company;
(i)
taking or granting loans which exceed the amount set out in the
Company's approval matrix;

Page 2

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
(j)
granting securities of any type;
(k)
granting loans to Company officers or employees and taking over
guarantees for the Company's officers and employees;
(l)
entering into agreements for recurring, voluntary or additional
social benefits, superannuation agreements or agreements for
general wage and salary increases;
(m)
determining the total amount of bonuses and gratuities for
Company officers and employees;
(n)
determining the appointment, termination, prolongation of
employment or amendment to conditions of employment of
members of the Board; and
(o)
granting or revoking a power of attorney or limited authority to sign
and/or act on behalf of the Company.
The detail of some board functions will be handled through Board
Committees as and when the size and scale of operations requires such
Committees. However, the Board as a whole is responsible for
determining the extent of the powers residing in each Committee and is
ultimately responsible for accepting, modifying or rejecting Committee
recommendations.
The MD (as a delegate of the Board) is responsible for the effective
leadership and day-to-day operations and administration of the Company.
The responsibilities of the Board as a whole, the Chair, individual
Directors and the functions delegated to Senior Management are set out
in more detail in Part A of the Company's Board Charter, which is
available on the Corporate Governance page of the Company's website
www.mitremining.com.au.
Recommendation 1.2 Yes The Board will consider nominations for appointment or election of
Directors that may arise from time to time, having regard to the skills and

Page 3

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
A listed entity should:
(a)
undertake appropriate checks before appointing a
director or senior executive or putting someone forward
for election as a director; and
(b)
provide security holders with all material information in
its possession relevant to a decision on whether or not
to elect or re-elect a director.
experience required by the Company and procedures outlined in the
Company's constitution and the_Corporations Act 2001_(Cth).
The Company undertakes appropriate checks before appointing a person,
or putting forward to shareholders a candidate for election, as a Director.
Candidates are assessed through interviews, meetings and background
and reference checks (which may be conducted both by external
consultants and by Directors) as appropriate.
The Company gives shareholders all material information in its possession
relevant to the decision whether or not to elect or re-elect a Director, either
in the notice of meeting and explanatory statement for the relevant
meeting of shareholders which addresses the election or re-election of the
Director, or by including in the notice a clear reference to the location on
the Company's website, Annual Report or other document lodged with
ASX where the information can be found.
Recommendation 1.3
A listed entity should have a written agreement with each
director and senior executive setting out the terms of their
appointment.
Yes Under Part A clause 2.4 of the Board Charter, the Company must have a
written agreement with each Director and senior executive setting out the
terms of their appointment.
Each Non-Executive Director receives a letter formalising their
appointment and outlining the material terms of their appointment. The
Non-Executive Directors of the Company have not been appointed for a
fixed term. Each Non-Executive Director has signed a letter of
appointment.
The Managing Director has signed an employment agreement setting out
their duties, obligations and remuneration.

Page 4

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
The Company Secretary has entered into a consultancy agreement
(through an entity he controls) with the Company setting out his role,
responsibilities and remuneration.
Recommendation 1.4
The company secretary of a listed entity should be accountable
directly to the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with
the proper functioning of the board.
Yes As set out in Part A clause 5 of the Board Charter, the Company
Secretary is accountable to the Board, through the Chair, on all
governance matters and reports directly to the Chair as the representative
of the Board. The Company Secretary has primary responsibility for
ensuring that the Board processes and procedures run efficiently and
effectively. The Company Secretary is Adrien Wing (appointed 1 April
2021), whose qualifications and experience are stated in Section 4.3(c) of
the Company's Prospectus dated 13 August 2021.
Recommendation 1.5
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a diversity policy;
(b)
through its board or a committee of the board, set
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity in
the composition of its board, senior executives and
workforce generally; and
(c)
disclose in relation to each reporting period:
(i)
the measurable objectives set for that period to
achieve genderdiversity;
Partially The Company has implemented a diversity policy which will be made
available at www.mitremining.com.au.
Due to the current size and composition of the organisation, the Board
does not consider it appropriate to provide measurable objectives in
relation to gender diversity. The Company is committed to ensuring that
the appropriate mix of skills, expertise, and diversity are considered when
employing staff at all levels of the organisation and when making new
senior executive and Board appointments and is satisfied that the
composition of employees, senior executives and members of the Board
is appropriate.

Page 5

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
(ii)
the entity's progress towards achieving those
objectives; and
(iii)
either:
(A)
the respective proportions of men and
women on the board, in senior
executive positions and across the
whole workforce (including how the
entity has defined "senior executive" for
these purposes); or
(B)
if the entity is a "relevant employer"
under the Workplace Gender Equality
Act, the entity's most recent "Gender
Equality Indicators", as defined in and
published under the Act.
Recommendation 1.6
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating
the performance of the board, its committees and
individual directors; and
(b)
disclose for each reporting period whether a
performance evaluation has been undertaken in
accordance with that process during or in respect of
that period.
Yes The Charters of the Company's Board and Remuneration and Nomination
Committee outline the processes to be used for evaluating the
performance of, and the development and improvement of, the Board, its
committees, and its individual Directors.
These reviews will be carried out in accordance with the Company’s
Performance Evaluation Policy, which is available on the
Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au.
The Board has assessed the current and future needs of the Company,
and has set expectations for itself, its committees and its Directors. The
Remuneration and Nomination Committee will conduct the Board and
Committee performance reviews against these expectations. Based upon
the reviews, individuals and groups will be provided with feedback on
their performance and the results will provide a key input into the future
expectations set by the Board.

Page 6

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Recommendation 1.7
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for evaluating the
performance of its senior executives at least once every
reporting period; and
(b)
disclose for each reporting period whether a
performance evaluation has been undertaken in
accordance with that process during or in respect of
that period.
Yes The Board reviews the performance of its senior executives on an annual
basis. A senior executive, for these purposes, means key management
personnel (as defined in the Corporations Act), other than non-executive
Directors.
The applicable processes for these evaluations can be found in the
Company’s Performance Evaluation Policy, which is available on the
Company’s website.
The performance evaluation policy has been newly adopted and therefore
no performance evaluation has been undertaken in accordance with those
processes contained within the policy.
Principle 2 – Structure the board to be effective and add value
Recommendation 2.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a nomination committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
Partially Due to the size of the Board, the Company does not have a separate
nomination committee. The roles and responsibilities of a nomination
committee are currently undertaken by the Board.
The duties of the full Board in its capacity as a nomination committee are
set out in the Company’s Remuneration and Nomination Committee
Charter.
When the Board meets as a remuneration and nomination committee it
carries out those functions which are delegated to it in the Company’s
Remuneration and Nomination Committee Charter. Items that are usually
required to be discussed by a Remuneration and Nomination Committee
are marked as separate agenda items at Board meetings when required.

Page 7

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met throughout
the period and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose
that fact and the processes it employs to address board
succession issues and to ensure that the board has the
appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience,
independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its
duties and responsibilities effectively.
The Board has adopted a Remuneration and Nomination Committee
Charter which describes the role, composition, functions and
responsibilities of a Nomination Committee.
The Board as a whole reviews the size, structure and composition of the
Board including competencies and diversity, in addition to reviewing Board
succession plans and continuing development.
.
Recommendation 2.2
A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix
setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board currently
has or is looking to achieve in its membership.
Yes The Board is structured to facilitate the effective discharge of its duties
and to add value through its deliberations. It seeks to achieve a Board
composition with a balance of diverse attributes relevant to the Company's
operations and markets, including skills sets, background, gender,
geography and industry experience. In addition to those general skills
expected for Board membership, the following skills have also been
identified as being necessary such as operational management,
exploration and geology, mining engineering, project delivery, finance,
corporate governance, equity capital markets, legal, and commercial
negotiations.
A profile of each Director setting out their skills, experience and period of
office is set out in the Directors' Report of the latest Annual Report.

Page 8

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Recommendation 2.3
A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the names of the directors considered by the board to
be independent directors;
(b)
if a director has an interest, position or relationship of
the type described in Box 2.3 (Factors relevant to
assessing the independence of a director) but the board
is of the opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature of the interest,
position or relationship in question and an explanation
of why the board is of that opinion; and
(c)
the length of service of each director.
Yes As at 13 August 2021, the Board consisted of:
Name Role Independent? Date appointed
Clinton Carey Managing
Director
No 2 November 2020
Patrick
Gowans
Non-Executive
Director
Yes 1 April 2021
Adrien Wing Non-Executive
Director
Yes 21 May 2021
Recommendation 2.4
A majority of the board of a listed entity should be independent
directors.
Yes The Board is comprised of a majority of independent directors, with two
out of three considered to be independent directors.
ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Recommendation 2.3
A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the names of the directors considered by the board to
be independent directors;
(b)
if a director has an interest, position or relationship of
the type described in Box 2.3 (Factors relevant to
assessing the independence of a director) but the board
is of the opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature of the interest,
position or relationship in question and an explanation
of why the board is of that opinion; and
(c)
the length of service of each director.
Yes As at 13 August 2021, the Board consisted of:
Name Role Independent? Date appointed
Clinton Carey Managing
Director
No 2 November 2020
Patrick
Gowans
Non-Executive
Director
Yes 1 April 2021
Adrien Wing Non-Executive
Director
Yes 21 May 2021
Recommendation 2.4
A majority of the board of a listed entity should be independent
directors.
Yes The Board is comprised of a majority of independent directors, with two
out of three considered to be independent directors.

Page 9

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Recommendation 2.5
The chair of the board of a listed entity should be an
independent director and, in particular, should not be the same
person as the CEO of the entity.
Yes Patrick Gowans, who has been appointed as Non-Executive Chair, is
considered to be independent.
A copy of the definition of independence adopted by the Company is
annexed to the Company's Board Charter at Annexure A, available on the
Company's website at www.mitreming.com.au.
Recommendation 2.6
A listed entity should have a program for inducting new
directors and for periodically reviewing whether there is a need
for existing directors to undertake professional development to
maintain the skills and knowledge needed to perform their role
as directors effectively.
Yes It is the policy of the Board to ensure that the Directors and Senior
Management of the Company are equipped with the knowledge and
information they need to discharge their responsibilities effectively and
that individual and collective performance is regularly and fairly reviewed.
As referred to in Part D of the Board Charter, new directors go through an
induction process which includes meeting with key executives, tours of the
premises, an induction package and presentations. The Company also
expects all Directors, including the Managing Director, to commit to at
least 2 days of professional development each year and allocates an
annual budget to encourage Directors to participate in training and
development programs.

Page 10

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Principle 3 – Instil a culture of acting lawfully, ethically and responsibly
Recommendation 3.1
A listed entity should articulate and disclose its values.
Yes The Board has approved a statement of values and charges the Directors
with the responsibility of inculcating those values across the Company.
A copy of the Company's statement of values is available on the
Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au.

Page 11

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Recommendation 3.2
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a code of conduct for its directors,
senior executives and employees; and
(b)
ensure that the Board or a committee of the Board is
informed of any material breaches of that code.
Yes The Company seeks to encourage and develop a culture which will
maintain and enhance its reputation as a valued corporate citizen of the
countries where it operates and an employer which personnel enjoy
working for.
The Company has established a Code of Conduct that sets out the
principles covering appropriate conduct in a variety of contexts and
outlines the minimum standards of behaviour expected from its Directors
and employees. The Code of Conduct sets out policies in relation to
various corporate and personal behaviour including safety, discrimination,
respecting the law, anti-corruption, interpersonal conduct and conflict of
interest.
While the Code of Conduct seeks to prescribe standards of behaviour for
all Company personnel to observe, it does not, and understandably
cannot, identify every ethical issue that an individual might face. The Code
of Conduct's objective is to provide a framework for decisions and actions
in relation to ethical conduct in employment, to safeguard the Company's
reputation and to make clear the consequences of breaching the Code of
Conduct.
A copy of the Company's Code of Conduct is available on the Company's
website, www.mitremining.com.au.

Page 12

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Recommendation 3.3
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a whistleblower policy; and
(b)
ensure that the Board or a committee of the Board is
informed of any material incidents reported under that
policy.
Yes The Board has adopted a whistleblower protection policy to ensure
concerns regarding unacceptable conduct including breaches of the
Company's code of conduct can be raised on a confidential basis, without
fear of reprisal, dismissal or discriminatory treatment. The purpose of this
policy is to promote responsible whistle blowing about issues where the
interests of others, including the public, or of the organisation itself are at
risk.
A copy of the Company's whistleblower policy is available on the
Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au.
Recommendation 3.4
A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose an anti-bribery and corruption policy;
and
(b)
ensure that the Board or a committee of the Board is
informed of any material breaches of that policy.
Yes The Board has a zero-tolerance approach to bribery and corruption and is
committed to acting professionally, fairly and with integrity in all business
dealings. The Board has adopted an anti-bribery and anti-corruption policy
for the purpose of setting out the responsibilities in observing and
upholding the Company's position on bribery and corruption provide
information and guidance to those working for the Company on how to
recognise and deal with bribery and corruption issues.
A copy of the Company's anti-bribery and corruption policy is available on
the Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au.
Principle 4 – Safeguard the integrity of corporate reports
Recommendation 4.1
The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have an audit committee which:
Partially As a consequence of the size and composition of the Board (comprising
the Managing Director and Non-Executive Directors) the Board does not
have a stand-alone audit committee.
The Board as a whole has responsibilities typically assumed by an audit
committee, including but not limited to:

Page 13

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
(i)
has at least three members, all of whom are
non-executive directors and a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent director, who is
not the chair of the board,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the relevant qualifications and experience of the
members of the committee; and
(v)
in relation to each reporting period, the number
of times the committee met throughout the
period and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact
and the processes it employs that independently verify
and safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting,
including the processes for the appointment and
removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the
audit engagement partner.
(a)
verifying and safeguarding the integrity of the Company's
stakeholder reporting;
(b)
reviewing and approving the audited annual and reviewed half-
yearly financial reports;
(c)
reviewing the appointment of the external auditor, their
independence and performance, the audit fee, any questions of
their resignation or dismissal and assessing the scope and
adequacy of the external audit; and
(d)
a risk management function.
That is, matters typically dealt with by an audit committee are dealt with by
the full Board.
Information on the Company's procedures for the selection and
appointment of the external auditor and the rotation of external audit
partners is set out in the Policy on Selection, Appointment and Rotation of
External Auditors, which is available on the Company's website,
www.mitremining.com.au.
Recommendation 4.2
The board of a listed entity should, before it approves the
entity's financial statements for a financial period, receive from
its CEO and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the
financial records ofthe entityhave beenproperlymaintained
Yes Under the Company's Risk Management Policy, which is available on the
Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au, the Managing Director and
CFO (if there is one at the given time) will provide a written declaration of
assurance that in their opinion, the financial records of the Company for
any financial period have been properly maintained, comply with the

Page 14

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
and that the financial statements comply with the appropriate
accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the
financial position and performance of the entity and that the
opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk
management and internal control which is operating effectively.
appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the
financial position and performance of the Company and has been formed
on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control
which is operating effectively.
Recommendation 4.3
A listed entity should disclose its process to verify the integrity
of any periodic corporate report it releases to the market that is
not audited or reviewed by an external auditor.
Yes When preparing reports for release to the market including the quarterly
activity and cash flow reports, these reports shall be prepared and
reviewed by the Managing Director before being presented to the Board
for review and approval. Such reports shall not be released to market
without this review and approval process by executive management and
the Board.
Principle 5 – Make timely and balanced disclosure
Recommendation 5.1
A listed entity should have and disclose a written policy for
complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under ASX
Listing Rule 3.1.
Yes The Company has established a Continuous Disclosure Policy which is
designed to guide compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure
requirements, and to ensure that all Directors, senior executives and
employees of the Company understand their responsibilities under the
policy. The Continuous Disclosure Policy is available on the Company's
website, www.mitremining.com.au.
The Continuous Disclosure Policy:
(a)
raises awareness of the Company's obligations under the
continuous disclosure regime;
(b)
establishes a process to ensure that information about the
Company which may be market sensitive and which may require

Page 15

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
disclosure is brought to the attention of the Company Secretary or
Non-Executive Chair, being the person/s primarily responsible for
ensuring the Company complies with its continuous disclosure
obligations, in a timely manner and is kept confidential; and
(c)
sets out the obligation of Directors, officers and employees of the
Company to ensure that the Company complies with its
continuous disclosure obligations.
The Board has designated the Company Secretary as the person primarily
responsible for ensuring that the Continuous Disclosure Policy is
implemented and that all relevant information is disclosed as required.
In accordance with the Company's Continuous Disclosure Policy, all
information provided to ASX for release to the market is also posted to the
Company's website.
Recommendation 5.2
A listed entity should ensure that its Board receives copies of all
material market announcements promptly after they have been
made.
Yes The Board has appointed the Company Secretary as the person
responsible for communicating with ASX and overseeing and coordinating
the timely disclosure of information to ASX, subject to prior review and
approval of all announcements by the Directors. The Company Secretary
ensures that the Board are aware of when any announcement is due to go
out and when the confirmation of release is received by the ASX, the
Company Secretary promptly forwards this to the Board.
The Continuous Disclosure Policy of the Company is available on the
Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au.

Page 16

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Recommendation 5.3
A listed entity that gives a new and substantive investor or
analyst presentation should release a copy of the presentation
materials on the ASX Market Announcements Platform ahead
of the presentation.
Yes The Board has appointed the Company Secretary as the person
responsible for communicating with ASX and overseeing and coordinating
the timely disclosure of information to ASX, subject to prior review and
approval of all announcements by the Directors. The Company Secretary
ensures any substantive presentations are released to the ASX Market
Announcements Platform ahead of the presentation and in accordance
with the Continuous Disclosure Policy of the Company, a copy of which is
available on the Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au.
Principle 6 – Respect the rights of security holders
Recommendation 6.1
A listed entity should provide information about itself and its
governance to investors via its website.
Yes The Board aims to ensure that the Company's shareholders are informed
of all major developments affecting the Company's state of affairs.
The Company keeps investors informed through its website,
www.mitremining.com.au, which contains information on the Company,
the Board and the corporate governance policies and procedures of the
Company. Through its website, investors can access copies of the
Company's annual, half-yearly and quarterly reports (for at least three
historical years), announcements to the ASX, notices of meeting,
presentations and key media coverage.
Recommendation 6.2
A listed entity should have an investor relations program that
facilitates effective two-way communications with investors.
Yes The Company has a Shareholder Communication Policy which is
available on the Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au. The
Shareholder Communication Policy encourages shareholder participation
and engagement with the Company. This Policy also facilitates
communication directly between shareholders and the Company, with any
shareholder queries coordinated through the Company Secretary.

Page 17

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Recommendation 6.3
A listed entity should disclose how it facilitates and encourages
participation at meetings of security holders.
Yes The Shareholder Communications Policy encourages shareholder
participation at shareholders' meetings. Shareholders are provided with all
notices of meeting prior to meetings.
Shareholders are given ample opportunity to participate and to ask
questions of the Directors and management -- both during and after
meetings. Shareholders who are unable to attend the AGM or a general
meeting may submit questions and comments before the meeting to the
Company or to the auditor (in the case of the AGM).
Recommendation 6.4
A listed entity should ensure that all substantive resolutions at a
meeting of security holders are decided by a poll rather than by
a show of hands.
Yes The Company conducts a poll at meetings of security holders to decide
each resolution.
Recommendation 6.5
A listed entity should give security holders the option to receive
communications from, and send communications to, the entity
and its security registry electronically.
Yes The Company provides information through its website, enabling security
holders to email the Company and to receive Company announcements
by email. The share registry also provides (through its website, links to
which can be found on the Company's website) the ability to email the
share registry and to receive documents by email from the share registry.
Principle 7 – Recognise and manage risk
Recommendation 7.1
The board of a listed entity should:
Partially As a consequence of the size and composition of the Company's Board
(comprising the Managing Director and Non-Executive Directors) the
Board does not have a stand-alone risk committee.

Page 18

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
(a)
have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each
of which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met throughout
the period and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy paragraph (a) above, disclose that fact and the
processes it employs for overseeing the entity's risk
management framework.
The Board as a whole has responsibilities typically assumed by a risk
committee, including but not limited to:
(a)
ensuring that an appropriate risk-management framework is in
place and is operating properly; and
(b)
reviewing and monitoring legal and policy compliance systems
and issues.
That is, matters typically dealt with by a risk committee are dealt with by
the full Board.
Recommendation 7.2
The board or a committee of the board should:
(a)
review the entity's risk management framework at least
annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound
Yes The Company is committed to the identification, monitoring and
management of risks associated with its business activities and has
established policies in relation to the implementation of practical and
effective control systems. The Company has established a Risk
Management Policy, which is available on the Company's website,
mitremining.com.au.

Page 19

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
and that the entity is operating with due regard to the
risk appetite set by the board; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether
such a review has taken place.
Under the Company's Risk Management Policy, the Board reviews all
major strategies and purchases for their impact on the risks facing the
Company and makes appropriate recommendations. The Company also
undertakes an annual review of operations to update its risk profile, which
normally occurs in conjunction with the strategic planning process. The
Board also undertakes a review twice a year of the risk areas identified in
theRisk ManagementPolicy.
Recommendation 7.3
A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
if it has an internal audit function, how the function is
structured and what role it performs; or
(b)
if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact
and the processes it employs for evaluating and
continually improving the effectiveness of its
governance, risk management and internal control
processes.
Yes The Company will not have an internal audit function until the Company’s
operations are of a sufficient number and magnitude to be of benefit to the
Company. In the meantime, senior management with the involvement and
oversight of the full Board will carry out the duties that would be ordinarily
assigned to that function.
With the assistance of the Audit and Risk Committee, the Board performs
all key elements of an internal audit function, including:
(a)
evaluating, seeking and obtaining reasonable assurance that risk
management, control and governance systems are functioning as
intended and will enable the Company's objectives and goals to be
met;
(b)
evaluating information security and associated risk exposures;
(c)
evaluating regulatory compliance programs with consultation from
internal and external legal counsel;
(d)
evaluating the Company's preparedness in case of business
interruption; and
(e)
providing oversight of the Company's anti-fraud programs.
Recommendation 7.4 Yes The Company identifies and manages material exposure to environmental
and social risks in a manner consistent with its Risk Management Policy,
which is available on the Company's website, www.mitremining.com.au.

Page 20

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material
exposure to environmental or social risks and, if it does, how it
manages or intends to manage those risks.
The Company has, and continues to, undertake various organisation wide
risk reviews to identify potential business risks. The effectiveness of the
controls in place to address each risk is reviewed on a regular basis and,
where the residual risk is considered outside of acceptable limits, further
controls and risk mitigation measures are developed and implemented.
Environmental: The Company is subject to, and responsible for, ensuring
compliance with various regulations, licenses, approvals and standards so
that its activities do not cause unauthorised environmental harm. Through
its ongoing management of environmental activities, the Company
expects to operate in an environmentally sustainable and responsible
manner.
Social: The Company recognises that a failure to manage stakeholder
expectations may lead to disruption to the Company’s operations. The
Company is expects to be involved in and supportive of community
groups, organisations and charities in the region in which it will operate.
Principle 8 – Remunerate fairly and responsibly
Recommendation 8.1
The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a remuneration committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent director,
Yes As a consequence of the size and composition of the Board (comprising
the Managing Director and Non-Executive Directors) the Board does not
have a standalone remuneration committee.
The Board as a whole has responsibilities typically assumed by a
remuneration committee, including but not limited to:
(a)
reviewing the remuneration (including short- and long-term
incentive schemes and equity-based remuneration, where
applicable) and performance of Directors;
(b)
setting policies for senior executive remuneration, setting the
terms and conditions ofemploymentforseniorexecutives,

Page 21

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met throughout
the period and the individual attendances of the
members at those meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose
that fact and the processes it employs for setting the
level and composition of remuneration for directors and
senior executives and ensuring that such remuneration
is appropriate and not excessive.
undertaking reviews of senior executive performance, including
setting goals and reviewing progress in achieving those goals;
and
(c)
reviewing the Company's senior executive and employee
incentive schemes (including equity-based remuneration) (where
applicable) and making recommendations to the Non-Executive
Chair on any proposed changes.
That is, matters typically dealt with by a remuneration committee are dealt
with by the full Board. The Company has adopted a Remuneration and
Nomination Committee Charter available on the Company's website,
www.mitremining.com.au.
Recommendation 8.2
A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive directors
and the remuneration of managing directors and other senior
executives.
Yes The Corporate Governance Plan and Board Charter sets out the policies
and practices of the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors, Managing
Directors and other senior executives.
Non-Executive Directors are paid a fixed annual fee for their service to
the Company, but are also able to participate in the Company’s incentive
schemes at the invitation of, and complete discretion of, and the Board.
All Executive Directors of the Company typically receive remuneration
comprising a base salary component and other fixed benefits based on
the terms of their respective employment agreements with the Company
and potentially the ability to participate in the Company's long term
incentive plans.

Page 22

Doc ID 880349853/v1

ASX Corporate Governance Principle/Recommendation Comply Particulars of Compliance and If Not Why Not
Details of the remuneration of the Directors and other executives are set
out in the Company's Prospectus dated 13 August 2021.
Recommendation 8.3
A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme
should:
(a)
have a policy on whether participants are permitted to
enter into transactions (whether through the use of
derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk
of participating in the scheme; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
Yes The Company prohibits the use of Derivatives in relation to unvested
equity instruments, including performance share rights, and vested
Company Securities that are subject to disposal restrictions (such as a
'Holding Lock').
This is in line with the requirements of the Corporations Amendment
(Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Act
2011 (Cth), and is intended to prevent transactions which could have the
effect of distorting the proper functioning of performance hurdles or
reducing the intended alignment between management's and
shareholders' interests.
For the purposes of this policy, hedging includes the entry into any
derivative transaction within the meaning given in section 761D of the
Corporations Act (such as options, forward contracts, swaps, futures,
warrants, caps and collars) and any other transaction in financial products
which operate to limit (in any way) the economic risk associated with
holding the relevant securities.
The Trading Policy is available on the Company's website,
www.mitremining.com.au.

Page 23

Doc ID 880349853/v1