Investor Presentation • Mar 13, 2024
Investor Presentation
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Prepared for Alony Hetz Properties & Investments Ltd 2024 Capital Markets Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: This report has been prepared solely for information purposes and does not necessarily purport to be a complete analysis of the topics discussed, which are inherently unpredictable. It has been based on sources we believe to be reliable, but we have not independently verified those sources and we do not guarantee that the information in the report is accurate or complete. Any views expressed in the report reflect our judgment at this date and are subject to change without notice. Statements that are forward-looking involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause future realities to be materially different from those implied by such forward-looking statements. Advice we give to clients in particular situations may differ from the views expressed in this report. No investment or other business decisions should be made based solely on the views expressed in this report.


Uncertainty remains, but momentum should build as the year progresses

Growth
Growth to be slower, but still mostly positive in 2024—with momentum building in H2

Inflation/Prices
Inflation is falling, but prices remain elevated, and risks remain

Policy rates have peaked, but central banks may hold higher for longer than markets expect

Another year of elevated geopolitical tensions, policy risks, and election uncertainty

Uncertainty around the growth outlook is wide – many forecasts incorporate positive and negative views

2024 GDP growth forecast (% YoY)

Forecast range Median forecast

Source: JLL Research
3 | © 2024 Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc. All rights reserved.
U.S. 10 Year Treasury Yield (%)
Growth outlook is expected to be weak, but mostly positive, for major economies in 2024, with momentum expected to build in the latter half of the year

Firms continue to recruit more than they are laying off, leaving job vacancy rates elevated compared to historic norms
Employers are finalizing hybrid work policies, with a wave of major employers recently reversing remote-first work

Sustainable buildings are likely to drive greater interest from occupiers on account of the reduced operating and energy costs
Inflation is falling, but price levels are expected to remain elevated
Office re-entry rates have improved and reached a postpandemic high in 2023, surpassing and plateauing around 50% overall
Ratio of unassigned seating to dedicated desks is increasing as some employees trade assigned spaces for locational flexibility
Tenants are upgrading their offices with premium amenities and hospitality services to help lure remote workers back to the office

63.5% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% Jan-22 Feb-22 Mar-22 Apr-22 May-22 Jun-22 Jul-22 Aug-22 Sep-22 Oct-22 Nov-22 Dec-22 Jan-23 Feb-23 Mar-23 Apr-23 May-23 Jun-23 Jul-23 Aug-23 Sep-23 Oct-23 Nov-23 Dec-23
Placer.AI weekly average attendance rate
Source: JLL Research,Placer.ai, KPMG
5 | © 2024 Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc. All rights reserved.

of CEOs believe hybrid schedules will transition back to pre-pandemic attendance frequency by 2026
| Company | Initial Policy | Current/Announced Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Fidelity Investments | 1/4 weeks | 2/4 weeks |
| Deutsche Bank | 3 days/week | 4 days/week |
| Deere | 2 days/week | 4 days/week |
| L'Oreal | 3 days/week | 3 days/week + 2 Fri./month |
| UPS | 3 days/week | 5 days/week |
| JPMorgan | 3 days/week | 5 days/week |
| Disney | 3 days/week | 4 days/week |
| USAA | 3 days/week | 4 days/week |
| Boeing | 3 days/week | 4-5 days/week |
| Geico | 2 days/week | 4 days/week |
| BlackRock | 3 days/week | 4 days/week |
| Verizon | 1 day/week | 3-4 days/week |
| Nike | 3 days/week | 4 days/week |
| Nationwide Insurance | 1 day/week | 2 days/week |
| Daimler Trucks | 2 days/week | 4 days/week |

| • Traditional closed office layouts • Departure from traditional closed • Continued emphasis on collaboration • Open offices transition to activity comprised the dominant design, with office layouts and increased adoption drives increased adoption of open based working, providing different open office plans a more niche of open office plans featuring low or office plans – private offices become spaces for employees to self-select emerging concept. no partitions and a central working rarer and smaller. based on work preferences. area, designed to promote • Large private offices; not uncommon • Technology becomes deeply • Continued gradual shift away from collaboration. for executives to have private offices integrated to offices – computer private offices, plateauing of in excess of 500 s.f. • Introduction of first computer workstations become ubiquitous, downsizing of private offices. workstations, technology featured in increased infrastructure for hardware • Introduction of new technologies • Continued shift towards paperless offices more prominently which and wireless networks, first instances including copy machines and offices eliminates space needs for file necessitated new infrastructure to of remote work. computers. storage, increased adoption of manage cables. • Decreased reliance on paper begins technology leads to greater space • Design trends focused on improved • Growing focus on employee comfort: to eliminate space dedicated to file dedicated to technology employee experience: air improved furniture, natural light, storage. infrastructure. conditioning became widespread in improved aesthetics. offices in the 1950s, designs • Design begins to focus on • Design focuses on wellness and incorporated more vibrant color and sustainability and wellness, engagement: amenitized offices with patterns to create vibrant work introducing fitness centers, standing curated events and activities for environments. desks and other amenities. social engagement. 250-350 225-300 175-250 150-175 |
1950s 1960s |
1970s | 1980s | 1990s | 2000s | 2010s | 2020s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s.f. per employee s.f. per employee s.f. per employee s.f. per employee |

Structural shift in demand for highest quality assets
Source: JLL Research


Source: JLL Research, *Sizable share of assets will be converted to alternative uses, demolished or remain functionally challenged. Analysis reflects top 20 U.S. MSAs, office assets 100k+ s.f.
Rent growth in high-end product counterbalanced by persistent pressure from elevated concession packages and financing costs


Average cap rate (%)
Average asking rent (\$ p.s.f.)




Percent Leased by Product Tier
\$40.19 \$46.33 \$28.26 \$31.61 \$24.04 \$19.95 \$20.81 \$15.48 \$10 \$15 \$20 \$25 \$30 \$35 \$40 \$45 \$50 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Average Net Rental Rates by Product Tier Lifestyle Office (Tier 1) Radically reimagined product (Tier 2) Base Case Assumptions 15% change 12% change -18% change -26% change 5-Yr Change
Good bones w/ reposition potential (Tier 3) Functionally challenged (Tier 4)

Source: JLL Research; Analysis reflects top 20 U.S. MSAs, office assets 100k+ s.f.
Gross leasing activity

Source: JLL Research, Note: Tan bars represent leasing volume by coworking providers and are excluded from pre-pandemic average


Source: JLL Research


Source: JLL Research

Higher interest rate environment challenging buy/sell decisions; offices spreads projected to stabilize around +200 bps

*Assumes core/core plus assets with low to moderate leverage. CMBS spreads provided by JLL debt advisory business. Source: JLL Research, Bloomberg Finance L.P. (Current is as of February 16, 2024)



Source: JLL Research; Green Street, data as of 2/26/2024


Fed has to start taking interest rate down

Loan spreads have to stabilize

Investors' risk premium around recession risk must not worsen

Large money center banks have to return to the market

More clarity has to emerge around hybrid work's impact on office demand

ODCE ("Open end diversified core equity") funds marks need to reflect reality

| Market Conditions Today | |
|---|---|
| Rate sentiment has improved since the summer |
• Sentiment on rates has improved markedly since the summer • Consensus is that there will be rate cuts by H2 2024, which would have a positive impact on cost of capital and therefore residual cap rates |
| Debt market conditions remain challenging; Seller financing is still a potent tool to transact |
• Debt liquidity today varies substantially by both deal size and quality / profile of the underlying asset: • <\$75M loan sizes are generally gaining greater lender traction • Larger loans rely almost exclusively on CMBS / SASB (Single Asset Single Borrower) market, though exceptions have been made for high performing assets • For Tier 3 / 4 assets, the only options are from debt funds or existing sellers / lenders (who are offering future funding to fund leasing costs & TIs) • Money center banks, regional banks, life insurance companies are largely risk-off • CMBS / SASB market is starting to improve for other property types, indicating it could be possible for high-quality office assets in 2024 • Many institutional investors are beginning to raise debt funds to fill gap in A note space • Liquidity from CMBS, debt funds, insurance companies will payoff bank loans allowing banks to re-enter the market in 2025 |
| Supply dynamics continue to look favorable for Tier 1 and well-located Tier 2 assets |
• Net U.S. office supply loss is expected as soon as this year (2024) and we do not expect a meaningful pick-up in spec construction activity before 2030 • We are headed toward a "Great Basis Reset', particularly for Tier 3 & 4 assets during 2024 • Capital intensity (including Tis, free rent periods) remains high for offices and is acting as a drag on net effective rents, particularly for lower quality assets |
| Liquidity for office is expected to improve in 2024 |
• Private capital made up 76% of 2023 office investment activity • Institutional investors starting to believe the "right" office will provide alpha • Expectations are that there will be greater capital markets activity in 2024: • At the top end of the market (Tier 1 / 2), driven by opportunistic capital (HNW (High Net Worth) / Private / International / Private Equity) • At the lower end (Tier 3 / 4), driven by lender capitulation (short sales / loan sales / distressed processes) |
| Core cap rates have widened further with shifts in lending market |
• Office asset values remain down 20-50+% depending on asset quality and location, with Tier 1 assets holding value better • Cap rates for core, new construction assets with WALT ranges from 6.5%-7.5% today • When the 10-year dipped below 4%, we began to see residual cap rate compression on underwriting • K-shape recovery for office assets leading to distressed sellers of commodity office |
| Specialist office operators will be more critical to future performance |
• New standards for quality, amenitization, service and ESG will require a deeper level of operational expertise • Differentiated development, design and building operations and management will mitigate risks and unlock opportunities |
Source: JLL Research



Source: JLL Research

Average direct asking rents by building class, Washington, DC 2008- Q4 2023

Washington, DC total vacancy – Trophy vs remainder of market, 2010 - 2023
*As part of a continuous process of data quality improvement, JLL Research re-evaluated market performance of all DC office buildings against their assigned building class. We reclassified buildings as needed to ensure consistency in class designation. Q4 2023 market statistics reflect the reclassified building set.

Source: JLL Research


Source: JLL Research


Exposure to Future Downsizing Risk



1% of Buildings 10% of Buildings 25% of Buildings 50% of Buildings

Source: JLL Research
| Central London | Q4 2023 | 10-year quarterly average |
Year-on-year change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterly take-up (sq ft) |
3.4 million | 2.6 million | |
| YTD take-up (sq ft) |
9.7 million | 10.2 million | |
| Under offer (sq ft) |
2.3 million | 2.7 million | |
| Active demand (sq ft) | 12.2 million | 9.2 million | |
| Overall vacancy rate (%) | 9.2% | 5.7% | |
| New build vacancy rate (%) | 1.5% | 1.0% | |
| Speculative under construction (sq ft) | 10.3 million | 8.2 million | |
| Quarterly investment volumes (£bn) | £1.6 billion | £3.4 billion | |
| YTD investment volumes (£bn) | £6.6 billion | £13.7 billion |




| Geopolitics | Future of Work | Technology | Sustainability | Capital |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Military conflicts | Workplace experience |
The AI era | Climate risk | Inflation & interest rates |
| Defense and security |
New work models | Automation & robotics |
Energy transition, renewables, clean tech |
Debt super-cycle and financing gap |
| Deglobalization | Talent landscape | Quantum computing | ||
| Supply chain | Location strategies | Digital and "smart" | Net zero carbon | Real estate allocations / models |
| diversification | and future of cities | everything | Policy and regulation | |

Disclaimer: This report has been prepared solely for information purposes and does not necessarily purport to be a complete analysis of the topics discussed, which are inherently unpredictable. It has been based on sources we believe to be reliable, but we have not independently verified those sources and we do not guarantee that the information in the report is accurate or complete. Any views expressed in the report reflect our judgment at this date and are subject to change without notice. Statements that are forward-looking involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause future realities to be materially different from those implied by such forward-looking statements. Advice we give to clients in particular situations may differ from the views expressed in this report. No investment or other business decisions should be made based solely on the views expressed in this report.

Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.