AI assistant
Alkane Resources — Investor Presentation 2011
Aug 18, 2011
48579_rns_2011-08-18_b0849648-a297-4672-b84d-c810e645ab06.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [114 x 57] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [76 x 12] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
RESOURCES LTD
ABN 35 000 689 216
----- End of picture text -----
19 August 2011
Manager Announcements Company Announcements Office ASX Limited 20 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000
Dear Sir,
PRESENTATION
Attached is a copy of the Company’s presentation to the NSW Mineral Exploration & Investment 2011 Conference being held in Sydney today.
A copy of this presentation will also be available on the Company’s website www.alkane.com.au.
Yours faithfully, for ALKANE RESOURCES LTD
==> picture [167 x 78] intentionally omitted <==
D I Chalmers Managing Director
65 Burswood Road, Burswood WA 6100, AUSTRALIA (PO Box 4384, Victoria Park WA 6979, AUSTRALIA) Telephone: +61 8 9227 5677 Facsimile: 61 8 9227 8178 www.alkane.com.au [email protected]
Development Projects in the Central West of NSW Sydney 19 August 2011
Corporate snapshot
Shareholder profile*
Exchanges ASX: ALK OTCQX: ANLKY Share Price (18 August 2011) A$1.68 Shares 269m Fully Diluted Market Cap ~A$450m Cash ( a t 30 une J 2011) m ~A$18 Retail Top 20 ~60% No debt Institutions Directors & Management 3% 12 Month High / Low A$2.73/ $0.42 at 30 june 2011 Abbotsleigh (Gandel Metals) 26% Directors & Management J S F Dunlop Chairman D I Chalmers Managing Director A D Lethlean Non‐Executive Director I J Gandel Non‐Executive Director L A Colless CFO Joint Secretary K E Brown Joint Secretary T W Ransted Chief Geologist M D Sutherland General Manager NSW A Wright Commercial Manager* Source: FT
==> picture [599 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Business Strategy
Multi commodity explorer and miner, focussed in the Central West of New South Wales, Australia
Dubbo Zirconia Project – world class resource of zirconium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum, yttrium and rare earths
Gold production from Peak Hill mine 1996 – 2005. New gold development planned at Tomingley based upon 650,000 oz resource
Major gold discovery at McPhillamys (~3 million oz) Jo nt enture w ti V i h Newmont
Develop multiple operations within tight geographic area over next five years. New discoveries at Cudal (AuZn) , Bodangora (Au-Cu) and Galwadgere (Cu-Au)
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [272 x 43] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [272 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [272 x 242] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Au Au Cu
Zr Nb Cu
Y REE
Au
150km area
Au
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 199] intentionally omitted <==
Dubbo Zirconia Project Zirconium, niobium, yttrium, rare earth elements
Definitive Feasibility Study TZ Minerals International Pty Ltd Study managers: Steve Gilman and Gavin Diener Marketing: Alister MacDonald (TCMS) and Dudley Kingsnorth (IMCOA) Engineering: EPMS and Mintrex
DPP Operations: ANSTO Minerals Group Bob Ring, Doug Collier, Karin Soldenoff, Des Levins, Adrian Manis, Chris Griffiths, Peter Fletcher, Prakash Rajalingam Environmental Assessment: R W Corkery & Co Pty Ltd
==> picture [842 x 129] intentionally omitted <==
Dubbo Zirconia Project Location Dubbo reg on pop i 80 000, State power grid State gas grid Major mixed agriculture Transport hub Substantial light industry
==> picture [842 x 134] intentionally omitted <==
| DZP Resources | ||
| Measured Resource : 35.7 million tonnes grading |
||
0 - 55 metres 1.96% Zr02, 0.04%HfO2, 0.46% Nb2O5 , 0.03% Ta2O5 , 0.14% Y2O3,0.75% REO (0.9% TREO) |
||
| Inferred Resource : 37.5 million tonnes at similar grades 55 - 100 metres |
||
| TOTAL : 73.2 million tonnes |
||
| Major world resource of zirconium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum, yttrium and rare earth elements | ||
| Th dit ntin lw lvl f U nd Th Prdtin f rnim i rrntl rhibitd in NSW |
||
| e epos coas o ees o a ouco o uau s cuey poe . |
||
==> picture [842 x 537] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
DZP Flow Sheet
Heavy REs
Niobium
Zirconium
Light REs
----- End of picture text -----
DZP Demonstration Pilot Plant
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
DPP at ANSTO in Sydney The process s un que n i i i the world at present and is a whole of ore sulphuric acid leach, solvent extraction separation and refining, with chemical precipitation to produce final products. The process does not produce a mineral concentrate and does not concentrate the uranium and thorium.
==> picture [842 x 134] intentionally omitted <==
Zirconium A lications pp
==> picture [842 x 537] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Zirconium Industr
y
China consumes about
50% of world’s zircon
output.
About 30% of that zircon
is converted to
downstream products.
China currently
produces about 90% of
world’s ZOC and 60% of
FZA.
China has limited
domestic supply of
Zircon Zirconium silicate ZrSiO4 Primary Zr mineral source Value zircon and acquire from
2010 1.4 million tonnes ~US$1.6 billion � US$3.5B major producers (Aust
and S Africa).
Zircon um proi ducts Zircon a ri Z O2 [, rcon um c] Zi i h [em ca s, r me] i l Z t [a] l
2010 120,000 tonnes ~US$0.7 billion � US$1.2B
Source: TCMS
----- End of picture text -----
Niobium A lications pp
==> picture [842 x 537] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Structure of Niobium Industr
y
Metallurgical
� Structural steels
� Stainless and heat CBMM in Brazil
Pyrochlore FeNb resistant steels produces about 90%
� Superalloys of world demand.
� Super conducting
magnets
Early 2011 a Japanese
Korean consortium
Columbite
Tantalite Nb2O 5 acquired 15% of
Oxides CBMM for US$1.95B
� Glass
� Ceramics
DZP Nb DZP process removes
Concentrate
radioactive elements
such as uranium and
thorium, producing
Nb Raw Materials Intermediate Products Applications
clean concentrate
Ferro‐niobium FeNb Niobium pentoxide Nb2O5 Value
2010 85,000 tonnes ~US$2.0 billion � US$3B
Source: TZMI
----- End of picture text -----
REE A lications pp
==> picture [842 x 537] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Rare Earth Su l ‐ Demand
pp y
Will rare earth supply
demand be in balance
from 2015 with Lynas
and Molycorp
producing?
High probability for
LREE but not HREE
The DZP has a 75%
LREE - 25% HREE
split which gives it a
demand advantage
Separated rare earth products Value
2010 130,000 tonnes ~US$2.0 billion � US$10B ???
Source: IMCOA
----- End of picture text -----
REE Demand Drivers
Growth 10 – 15% 5 - 10% 5 – 10% 4 - 8% 8 -12% 4 – 8% Source: IMCOA
DZP Marketin Develo ments g p
==> picture [842 x 276] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
.
Three MOUs completed that should take all of the 1Mtpa zirconium output
Zirconium Niobium LREE YHREE
US$125 – 150M
100%
75%
In Progress In Progress In Progress
50%
25%
0%
----- End of picture text -----
Several other MOUs in discussion that will cover all niobium and rare earth outputs.
==> picture [842 x 129] intentionally omitted <==
Financial – DZP Product Out ut and Revenues p
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
Base case of 400,000 tonnes pa and expanded 1 million tonnes pa of ore processed
| Potential Production and Revenues | |||||||
| Product | 400,000 tonnes per annum | 1,000,000 tonnes per annum | |||||
| ZBS, ZOH, ZBC, ZrO2 | 6,000tpa US$42M* |
15,000tpa | US$105M* | ||||
| Nb -Ta concentrate | 1,400tpa US$42M* |
3,500tpa | US$105M* | ||||
| LREE concentrate | 1,415tpa US$57M** |
3,540tpa | US$142M** | ||||
| YHREE concentrate | 425tpa US$24M** |
1,070tpa | US$63M** | ||||
| AVERAGED TOTALS | 9,240tpa US$160 - 170Mpa |
23,110tpa | US$400 - 450Mpa | ||||
| Zr @ US$7.00/kg and Nb @ US$30/kg as intermediate average prices* Price average of Q4 2010 for REO basket and assumes concentrate at 70% of total separated REO value REO output based on average 50% recovery |
Full operating, capital costs and revenues will be detailed in the feasibility study nearing completion
� ZBS = zirconium basic sulphate; ZOH = zirconium hydroxide; ZBC = zirconium carbonate Equivalent ~99% ZrO2 + HfO2
� Nb-Ta concentrate = ~70% Nb2O5 + Ta2O5 calcined basis � LREE = La, Ce, Nd, Pr � YHREE = Y, Gd, Dy, Tb
==> picture [599 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
| Developmentpathway | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 2013 2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| ‐> 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| DZP | Resource definition 2001 ‐ 2002 | ~~�~~ |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Flow sheet development 2002 | � |
uct | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Laboratory Zr – Nb 1999 – 2002 | � | Co |
ntin |
ue |
d prod |
||||||||||||||||||
| Pilot plant Zr – Nb 2002 | � |
~~dev~~ | ~~elo~~ | ~~pment~~ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Mine Plan & Scheduling 2002 | � | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plant Design & Engineering 2002 | � | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Laboratory Y & REE 2009 ‐ | � | � | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Demonstration Pilot Plant 2008 ‐ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ZNbPdDiibi | � | � | � | ||||||||||||||||||||
| r – rouct struton | r elopment |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Y ‐ REE Product Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secure Offtake Agreements | ~~et~~ | ~~il c~~ | ~~osts fo~~ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Definitive Feasibility Study | 2002 | e |
**xpa ** |
nd |
ed dev |
||||||||||||||||||
| Environmental Impact (EA) | 2000 ‐> | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Detailed Design | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing / Development Consent | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production | |||||||||||||||||||||||
DZP Production Plant La out y
==> picture [842 x 265] intentionally omitted <==
Tomingley Project Gold Definitive Feasibility Study Mintrex Pty Ltd Study Manager: Fiona Morgan Environmental Assessment R W Corkery & Co Pty Ltd
==> picture [842 x 134] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [22 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [38 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
Tomingley Gold Project, NSW ALKANE RESOURCES: 100% • Three deposits under conceptual development : – Caloma (3 . 86Mt @ . 1 76g/t Au) – Wyoming One (6.59Mt @ 1.86g/t Au) – Wyoming Three (0.84Mt @ 1.75g/t Au) 947 AC, RC and core holes totalling 109,114 metres • Total current combined resource (d) + 660,000oz – Expansion potential Caloma Two • Deposits open at depth • Significant regional exploration potential • Minimum seven year mine life => +10yr target • Initial open pit +underground operations (Yrs 1‐7) Additional open pit and ug (Yrs 7 ‐10)
==> picture [842 x 134] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [22 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [38 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [37 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
-
TGP Infrastructure
-
• Infrastructure: – water => 45km pipeline – power (State Grid) => 20km 66Kv power line – roads => primary & secondary access
-
• Skilled local workforce – population base of 150,000 within 120km diameter area
-
– No FIFO, no accommodation required
-
• Capital costs ~A$90 Million – CIL plant A$43m
-
– Infrastructure A$22.6m
-
– Owners costs A$23m
-
Proposed site layout
==> picture [599 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
| TGP Financials | |||||||
| Financial Summary Based on initial 7.5 year open pit and undergound operation producing 370,000 ounces |
|||||||
| Financial Summary Based on initial 7.5 year open pit and undergound operation producing 370,000 ounces |
|||||||
| Base Case | Anticipated | Upside | |||||
| Gold Price | A$1,400 / oz | A$1,500 / oz | A$1,600 / oz | ||||
| Revenue | $516.97m | $553.89m | $590.82m | ||||
| Operating Cash Flow |
$155.20m | $192.13m | $233.86m | ||||
| * | |||||||
| Net Cash Flow | $65 39m . |
$102 32m . |
$144 65m . |
||||
| IRR | 14.5% | 22.2% | 33.3% | ||||
| NPV | $15.08m | $41.61m | $76.73m | ||||
| Credit Suisse granted mandate to provide up to A$45m debt facility with gold hedging program to return average A$1,500 / ounce Targeting +10 year mine life ..... awaiting development consent |
Credit Suisse granted mandate to provide up to A$45m debt facility with gold hedging program to return average A$1,500 / ounce
Targeting +10 year mine life ..... awaiting development consent
==> picture [599 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 199] intentionally omitted <==
Advanced Exploration Gold ODEJV ‐ McPhillamys Newmont Australia Limited (NAL) Subsidiary of US based Newmont Mining Corporation NAL are the Managers and Operators
==> picture [842 x 134] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 91] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ODEJV
----- End of picture text -----
ORANGE DISTRICT EXPLORATION JOINT VENTURE (ODEJV)
Gold, Copper – Orange, NSW | Alkane Resources: 49%, Newmont Australia: 51%
==> picture [220 x 15] intentionally omitted <==
TWO FOCUS AREAS:
==> picture [842 x 401] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
MOLONG
•
Molong
Carlin & Ridgeway‐type – targeting copper‐gold porphyry‐style gold
porphyry targets ‐
mineralisation (Ridgeway type) and Carlin style
• Moorilda
MOORILDA
–
drilling confirms a major gold system @
M c Phill amy s ’
Cadia Valley
+50Moz
•
Newmont have earned 51%, to go to 75% by
carrying all expenditures through to completion
Orogenic (structural) of final BFS
gold targets
…low risk with significant upside + 4moz system
----- End of picture text -----
ODEJV Moorilda | McPhillamys
||ODEJV Moorilda | McPhillamys|ODEJV Moorilda | McPhillamys|
|---|---|---|
||INITIAL RESOURCES
•
Indicated + Inferred
+0.3g/t gold||
||92 Mt @ 1.00g/t Au 0.07% Cu
2.96 Moz Au & 60,000t Cu
•
Indicated + Inferred
+0.5g/t gold
61 Mt @ 1.32g/t Au 0.08% Cu||
||2.57 Moz Au & 48,000t Cu
•
Mineralisation open at depth
Deep drilling in progress||
||•
Conceptual studies for both open pit
and block cave mining
•
Preliminary metallurgical scoping
indicates +90% gold recovery from CIL
BASE AREAS
•Ot l 1000 26001/t A||
||
uer ore enveope ,m x m .g u
•
Likely low waste to ore ratio to
significant depth for open pit
• Inner ore zone 600m x 200m to 450m depth
• Average 2.8 SG
Compare Barricks Cowal Operation
• 64Mt @ 1.22g/t Au at start up
• 8Mtpa for ~ 250,000ozpa||
||||
||… potential open cut or block caving operation||
… potential open cut or block caving operation
==> picture [599 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 537] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Exploration
Exp oral tion
2010 ‐ 2011 Discoveries
Bodangora Glen Hollow gold – copper
Wellington Galwadgere copper – gold
Cudal Bowen Park gold – zinc
----- End of picture text -----
Bodangora – Glen Hollow Comobella Intrusive Complex 4km x 3km monzonite intrusives / skarn / hydrothermal breccias Comparable to Cadia – Ridgeway (Newcrest) system near Orange
==> picture [305 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 266] intentionally omitted <==
Bodangora – Glen Hollow
==> picture [338 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
Is it similar to Ridgeway discovery? Resource = 44Mt @ 2.6g/t Au; 0.82% Cu
==> picture [165 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 273] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [338 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [168 x 48] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Newcrest
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Wellington – Galwadgere Indicated Resource defined 2004 2.09Mt @ 0.99% Cu and 0.3g/t Au Potential to open pit mine bulk of existing resource to produce 27% Cu and 3g/t Au clean concentrate
==> picture [287 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [287 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [287 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 266] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Cu and 3g/t Au clean concentrate
----- End of picture text -----
Wellington – Galwadgere 14m @ 1 13 g/t Au. , .0 94% Cu + 0 89% Zn. Incl 4m 0.94g/t Au, 1.69% Cu + 2.98% Zn Long Section GAL032 intersection 200m down plunge and has potential to double existing defined resource
==> picture [599 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 537] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Cudal – Bowen Park
New style of mineralisation
– structural / replacement
Many exploration targets to be tested
----- End of picture text -----
| Project Development Pipeline | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||
| TOMINGLEY GOLD | D fi iti F ibilit St d (DFS) e n ve eas y **u y ** |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Environmental Assessment / DC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Financing @ $A90m | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DUBBO ZIRCONIA | Production | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Environmental Assessment / DA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Financing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| McPHILLAMYS | Construction | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exploration/Pre‐feasibility | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bankable Feasibilit Stud (BFS) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Galwadgere | y y | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production | ? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exploration/Pre‐feasibility | ? | ? | ? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| B d o angora Cudal |
E l ti /P f ibilit xp ora on re‐ eas y |
? | ? | ? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Exploration/Pre‐feasibility | ? | ? | ? | |||||||||||||||||||||
DZP + TGP “Plan Z”
Peak Hill Gold Mine Site
==> picture [413 x 38] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [413 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [413 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [413 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [413 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
Below the existing mine, Peak Hill contains a large sulphide resource grading 1.3g/t to 4.40g/t gold.
This could be mined and taken to Toongi (DZP) as sulphur source for DZP sulphuric acid production.
Oxidized product returned to the TGP and processes through the CIL plant.
Cheaper acid for the DZP, additional gold or Tf GP at incremental cost increase.
An example of the synergies between commodities and projects in the same region
==> picture [599 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Disclaimer
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
Disclaimer
This presentation contains certain forward looking statements and forecasts, including possible or assumed reserves and resources, production levels and rates, costs, prices, future performance or potential growth of Alkane Resources Ltd, industry growth or other trend projections. Such statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors which are beyond the control of Alkane Resources Ltd. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those expressed of implied by these forward looking statements depending on a variety of factors. Nothing in this presentation should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities.
Competent P erson
The information in this presentation that relates to mineral exploration, mineral resources and ore reserves is based on information compiled by Mr D I Chalmers, FAusIMM, FAIG, (director of the Company) has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Ian Chalmers consents to the inclusion in the presentation of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
==> picture [842 x 134] intentionally omitted <==
TGP – Peak Hill Resource Statement
| DEPOSIT MEASURED INDICATED INFERRED TOTAL |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Top Cut Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Gold mgeol model (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (koz) |
||||
| Wyoming One 2,379,000 2.52 878,000 3.07 3,227,000 2.35 6,484,000 2.51 523.2 |
||||
| Wyoming Three 670,000 2.05 44,000 2.02 123,000 1.64 837,000 1.99 53.5 |
||||
| Caloma 2,073,350 2.24 448,140 1.91 1,567,680 1.69 4,089,170 1.99 262.0 |
||||
| Total 5,122,350 2.35 1,370,140 2.66 4,917,680 2.12 11,410,170 2.29 838.7 |
||||
| DEPOSIT MEASURED INDICATED INFERRED TOTAL |
||||
| Top Cut Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Gold 2.5x2.5x5.0m (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (koz) model |
||||
| Wyoming One 2,227,000 2.07 882,000 2.25 3,478,000 1.62 6,587,000 1.86 393.2 |
||||
| Wyoming Three 630,000 1.87 58,000 1.73 154,000 1.25 842,000 1.75 47.3 |
||||
| Caloma 2,047,750 2.04 440,050 1.71 1,371,620 1.36 3,859,420 1.76 218.5 |
||||
| Total 4,904,750 2.03 1,380,050 2.06 5,003,620 1.54 11,288,420 1.82 658.9 |
These Mineral Resources are based upon information compiled by Mr Richard Lewis MAusIMM (Lewis Mineral Resource Consultanting Pty Ltd) who is a competent person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Richard Lewis consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The full details of methodology are given in the ASX Reports dated 25March 2009 and 2 October 2009 .
| DEPOSIT MEASURED INDICATED INFERRED TOTAL |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5g/tgold Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade k Ounces |
||||
| cut off (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) |
||||
| Proprietary Peak Hill 9,440,000 1.35 1,830,000 0.98 11,270,000 1.29 467.4 |
||||
| 3.0g/t gold Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade Tonnage Grade k Ounces cut off (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) (t) (g/t) |
||||
| Proprietary Peak Hill 810,000 4.40 810,000 4.40 114.6 |
||||
| These Mineral Resources are based upon information compiled by Mr Terry Ransted MAusIMM (Principal, Multi Metal Consultants Pty Ltd) who is a competent person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Terry Ransted consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The full details of methodology were given in the 2004 Annual Report. |
||||
DZP – Galwadgere Resource Statement
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
Dubbo Zirconia Project
| Toongi Tonnage ZrO2 HfO2 Nb2O5 Ta2O5 Y2O3 REO U3O8 Deposit (Mt) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured 35.70 1.96 0.04 0.46 0.03 0.14 0.75 0.014 |
||||
| Inferred 37.50 1.96 0.04 0.46 0.03 0.14 0.75 0.014 |
||||
| TOTAL 73.20 1.96 0.04 0.46 0.03 0.14 0.75 0.014 |
These Mineral Resources are based upon information compiled by Mr Terry Ransted MAusIMM (Principal, Multi Metal Consultants Pty Ltd) who is a competent person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Terry Ransted consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The full details of methodology were given in the 2004 Annual Report.
Wellington ‐ Ga wal dgere
| DEPOSIT MEASURED INDICATED 0.5% Cu cut off Tonnage Grade Grade Tonnage Grade Grade (t) (% Cu) (g/t) (t) (% Cu) (g/t) |
||
|---|---|---|
| Galwadgere - - 2,090,000 0.99 0.3 |
These Mineral Resources are based upon information compiled by Mr Terry Ransted MAusIMM (Principal , Multi Metal Consultants Pty Ltd) who is a competent person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Terry Ransted consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The full details of methodology were given in the 2005 Annual Report
==> picture [842 x 134] intentionally omitted <==
McPhillamys Resource Statement
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 6] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [80 x 7] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [44 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys
| McPhillamys Resource Statement Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys |
McPhillamys Resource Statement Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys |
McPhillamys Resource Statement Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys |
McPhillamys Resource Statement Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys |
McPhillamys Resource Statement Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys |
McPhillamys Resource Statement Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys |
McPhillamys Resource Statement Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys |
McPhillamys Resource Statement Moorilda ‐ McPhillamys |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEPOSIT INDICATED INFERRED TOTAL McPhillamys Tonnage Grade Grade Tonnage Grade Grade Tonnage Grade Grade k Ounces tonnes 0.3g/t Au cut-off (t) (g/t) % Cu (t) (g/t) % Cu (t) (g/t) % Cu gold copper Inner Ore Zone 51,650,000 1.10 0.07 23,504,000 1.19 0.07 75,154,000 1.13 0.07 2,723.6 55,091 Outer Ore Envelope 9,624,000 0.44 0.04 7,167,000 0.43 0.03 16,791,000 0.43 0.03 234.7 5,729 |
||||||||
| McPhillamys | Tonnage Grade Grade |
Tonnage Grade Grade |
Tonnage Grade Grade |
k Ounces | tonnes | |||
| 0.3g/t Au cut-off | (t) (g/t) % Cu |
(t) (g/t) % Cu |
(t) (g/t) % Cu |
gold | copper | |||
| Inner Ore Zone | 51,650,000 1.10 0.07 |
23,504,000 1.19 0.07 |
75,154,000 1.13 0.07 |
2,723.6 | 55,091 | |||
| Outer Ore Envelope | 9,624,000 0.44 0.04 |
7,167,000 0.43 0.03 |
16,791,000 0.43 0.03 |
234.7 | 5,729 | |||
| T t l o a |
61 274 000 0 99 0 07 , , . . |
30 671 000 1 01 0 06 , , . . |
91 945 000 1 00 0 07 , , . . |
2 958 3 , . |
60 820 , |
|||
| DEPOSIT | ||||||||
| McPhillamys | Tonnage Grade Grade |
Tonnage Grade Grade |
Tonnage Grade Grade |
k Ounces | tonnes | |||
| 0.5g/t Au cut-off | (t) (g/t) % Cu |
(t) (g/t) % Cu |
(t) (g/t) % Cu |
gold | copper | |||
| Inner Ore Zone | 41,260,000 1.27 0.08 |
16,097,000 1.57 0.09 |
57,357,000 1.36 0.08 |
2,499.9 | 46,933 | |||
| Outer Ore Envelope | 2,169,000 0.69 0.03 |
1,338,000 0.62 0.03 |
3,507,000 0.66 0.03 |
74.6 | 1,170 | |||
| Total | 43,429,000 1.24 0.08 |
17,435,000 1.50 0.08 |
60,864,000 1.32 0.08 |
2,574.5 | 48,104 | |||
| the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears The full details of methodology were given in the ASX Announcement 5 July 2010 Totals may not . . tally due to rounding.0 |
||||||||