Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Alkane Resources Capital/Financing Update 2020

Mar 8, 2020

48579_rns_2020-03-08_14de835a-4f64-4022-9898-d7648711e1b0.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX and MEDIA RELEASE

9 March 2020

==> picture [150 x 111] intentionally omitted <==

Roswell and San Antonio Resource Definition Drilling Update Spectacular Roswell gold intercept

  • An initial 60,000 metre resource definition drilling program on the San Antonio and Roswell prospects to the immediate south of the Tomingley Gold Operations (TGO) mine and processing facility is near completion. Assay results have been received for a further ~13,000 metres for inclusion in the San Antonio maiden resource calculation, as well as infill drilling at Roswell Deposit to advance Inferred Resources to Indicated/Measured Resource status.

  • Latest significant intercepts from the Roswell Deposit (Inferred Resource of 7.02Mt grading 1.97g/t Au) including the RWRC180 spectacular intercept of:

RWRC180 49 metres grading 8.71g/t Au from 218 metres; incl 2 metres grading 60.5g/t Au from 243 metres; RWRC192 25 metres grading 7.15g/t Au from 186 metres; incl 1 metre grading 38.9g/t Au from 187 metres; RWRC197 3 metres grading 3.30g/t Au from 168 metres; and 4 metres grading 9.67g/t Au from 196 metres; and 29 metres grading 2.90g/t Au from 207 metres; and 23 metres grading 1.82g/t Au from 244 metres;

  • Latest significant intercepts from the San Antonio prospect include:

RWRC212 15 metres grading 4.33g/t Au from 141 metres; incl 3 metres grading 12.4g/t Au from 144 metres; RWRC213 15 metres grading 7.43g/t Au from 147 metres; RWD024 7 metres grading 1.97g/t Au from 184 metres; and 18 metres grading 1.51g/t Au from 201 metres; and 8 metres grading 3.08g/t Au from 236 metres;

  • The first phase of San Antonio drilling is now complete and final assays are pending. A second phase of infill resource drilling comprising a further 50,000 metres has been awarded and is underway. An estimated resource for San Antonio is expected to be released within a month. Regional exploration drilling at the El Paso prospect has also commenced.

CONTACT : NIC EARNER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALKANE RESOURCES LTD, TEL +61 8 9227 5677 INVESTORS : NATALIE CHAPMAN, CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER, TEL +61 418 642 556 MEDIA : HILL+KNOWLTON STRATEGIES: MARCHA VAN DEN HEUVEL, TEL +61 2 9286 1226 OR +61 468 960 457

Ground Floor, 89 Burswood Road, Burswood WA 6100, AUSTRALIA (PO Box 4384, Victoria Park WA 6979, AUSTRALIA) Telephone: +61 8 9227 5677 Facsimile: +61 8 9227 8178 www.alkane.com.au [email protected]

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Tomingley Gold Project

Alkane Resources Ltd 100%

The Tomingley Gold Project (TGP) covers an area of approximately 440km[2 ] stretching 60km north-south along the Newell Highway from Tomingley in the north, through Peak Hill and almost to Parkes in the south. The TGP contains Alkane’s currently operating Tomingley Gold Operations (TGO), initially an open pit mine with a 1Mtpa processing facility that has now transitioned to underground.

Over the previous two years Alkane has conducted an extensive regional exploration program with the objective of defining additional resources that have the potential to be mined either via open pit or underground operations and fed to TGO. The program yielded broad, shallow high grade intercepts that demonstrate potential for material project life extension and show that a return to open pit mining and / or underground extension is possible with appropriate resource confirmation, landholder agreement and regulatory approvals.

San Antonio - Roswell Prospect Resource Definition Drilling

Significant broad high grade results were reported from the completion of a 17,519 metre RC and diamond core drilling program for the Roswell and San Antonio prospects (ASX announcements 1 February 2019, 29 March 2019 and 12 June 2019) 3km to 4km south of TGO as well as the El Paso prospect (ASX announcement 17 May 2019). A conceptual Exploration Target was subsequently reported (ASX announcement 9 July 2019).

A 60,000 metre resource definition drilling program was initiated in June 2019 at the Roswell and San Antonio prospects. The first five rounds of results for the initial 34,193 metres were announced to the ASX on 12 August 2019, 23 September 2019, 6 November 2019, 5 December 2019 and 17 January 2020. A maiden Inferred Resource for Roswell was calculated containing 7.02 million tonnes grading 1.97g/t gold (ASX announcement 28 January 2020). Assay results have now been received for a further 12,723 metres of drilling.

The drilling is being undertaken:

  • to define an initial Inferred Resource at the Roswell and San Antonio prospects with a nominal 40 metre by 40 metre drill hole spacing to a minimum 200 metre vertical depth;

  • is part of a 60,000 metres drilling program comprising approximately 10,000 metres of diamond core drilling and 50,000 metres of RC drilling. Results for 46,916 metres of drilling have now been received.

For the drilling being reported:

  • assay results were received for 12,723 metres targeting the San Antonio and Roswell prospects;

  • 3 metre composite RC samples were assayed however, where strong mineralisation is observed by the site geologist it was directly assayed at 1 metre intervals. Assaying of 1 metre re-split samples of 3 metre composites is ongoing;

  • these drilling results comprise of 29 RC drill holes (7,221m) infilling the resource drilling to 20m x 20m nominal spacing at the Roswell Deposit, and 9 RC drill holes (1,662m) and 11 diamond cored drill holes (3,841m) at the San Antonio prospect; and

  • representative sections for Roswell at 6390630mN (RWRC180, RWRC191-192) and San Antonio at 6389730mN (RWD024) are included on pages 6 and 7.

The initial phase of 40 by 40 metre drill hole spacing at San Antonio is completed and final assays are pending. These results will be incorporated into a maiden Inferred Resource which is expected to be released within a month. The release date is dependent on receiving final assay results in a timely manner from the laboratory.

2/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

All assay results of >0.5g/t Au are summarised in the Table below. The exploration results detailed below have been prepared and reported in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.

==> picture [466 x 663] intentionally omitted <==

3/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [466 x 684] intentionally omitted <==

4/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [466 x 684] intentionally omitted <==

5/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [466 x 622] intentionally omitted <==

6/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [466 x 622] intentionally omitted <==

7/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
RWRC179 614058 6390658 267 -58 270 214* 155 191 36 1.91 Roswell
incl 156 159 3 4.65
also 169 175 6 2.73
also 182 186 4 4.61
and 208 214* 6 3.38
RWRC180 614075 6390618 267 -58 270 270 218 267 49 8.71
incl 229 230 1 42.8
also 237 245 8 29.6
incl 243 245 2 60.5
also 258 259 1 22.4
RWRC185 614136 6390939 267 -62 270 246 154 155 1 0.50
and 206 212 6 0.54
RWRC186 614157 6390938 268 -62 270 257.7 45 60 15 0.64
and 78 88 10 0.68
and 92 96 4 1.98
and 124 125 1 1.92
and 155 156 1 0.58
and 186 187 1 1.28
and 199 210 11 0.50
and 216 224 8 1.05
incl 218 220 2 2.31
RWRC187 614199 6390937 268 -62 270 282 No significant mineralisation
RWRC188 614224 6390938 268 -62 270 300 No significant mineralisation
RWRC189 614137 6390918 268 -58 270 222 90 96 6 0.50
and 117 118 1 0.77
RWRC190 614118 6390980 268 -58 270 276 127 129 2 0.84
and 190 195 5 0.76
and 219 220 1 0.61
and 225 227 2 0.62
RWRC191 614001 6390638 267 -59 270 192 63 69 6 1.52
and 90 99 9 1.06
and 116 135 19 1.52
incl 129 130 1 10.9
and 139 140 1 17.1
RWRC192 614039 6390638 267 -59 270 270 97 99 2 0.98
and 107 109 2 0.83
and 151 156 5 0.99
and 160 168 8 0.99
and 186 211 25 7.15
incl 187 188 1 38.9
also 197 203 6 14.9
RWRC193 613979 6390677 267 -58 267 192 84 99 15 0.66
RWRC194 614020 6390679 267 -58 270 234 No significant mineralisation
RWRC195 614040 6390678 267 -58 270 270 108 111 3 2.28
and 141 144 3 0.63

8/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
and 156 180 24 2.42 Roswell
incl 162 165 3 11.6
and 243 270 27 0.53
RWRC196 614059 6390679 267 -58 270 306 125 126 1 1.05
and 131 139 8 2.43
incl 131 133 2 6.34
and 153 164 11 3.40
incl 154 155 1 18.6
and 183 214 31 1.45
incl 193 202 9 3.07
and 227 232 5 2.31
incl 227 229 2 4.63
and 237 238 1 0.92
and 246 260 14 0.52
and 271 272 1 0.64
and 280 290 10 0.50
RWRC197 614079 6390678 267 -58 270 342 168 171 3 3.30
incl 169 170 1 7.13
and 196 200 4 9.67
incl 199 200 1 27.9
and 207 236 29 2.90
incl 215 220 5 7.17
and 244 267 23 1.82
incl 256 262 6 3.45
and 287 314 27 0.54
RWRC198 613998 6390678 267 -58 270 210 57** 66 9 0.65
and 100 117 17 1.20
and 127 131 4 2.83
incl 129 130 1 6.49
RWRC199 614035 6390616 267 -58 270 228 105 110 5 0.50
and 112 113 1 0.71
and 115 122 7 3.90
incl 117 119 2 9.48
and 153 164 11 1.13
incl 153 154 1 4.12
and 169 172 3 0.58
and 177 212 35 1.84
incl 199 200 1 4.54
also 210 211 1 35.8
RWRC200 613978 6390699 267 -61 270 162 75 102 27 0.88
incl 90 96 6 2.11
RWRC201 614100 6390898 267 -58 270 168 110 120 10 1.60
incl 116 119 3 3.51
RWRC202 614118 6390899 268 -58 270 222 168 169 1 1.52
and 174 175 1 0.86

9/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
and 186 187 1 0.55 Roswell
RWRC203 614139 6390899 268 -58 270 222 72 87 15 0.62
and 106 109 3 0.61
and 141 144 3 7.60
and 174 175 1 0.65
and 209 210 1 2.02
RWRC204 614158 6390899 268 -58 270 240 42 54 12 0.59
and 60 66 6 0.50
and 157 159 2 0.66
and 170 173 3 0.52
and 175 176 1 0.77
and 197 215 18 0.75
RWRC205 614179 6390899 268 -58 270 294 236 237 1 1.02
and 242 243 1 0.67
and 247 251 4 0.96
and 257 262 5 0.56
RWRC206 614198 6390897 268 -58 270 324 259 267 8 1.08
incl 264 265 1 3.34
and 281 282 1 1.74
and 287 302 15 1.96
incl 295 300 5 3.85
and 307 313 6 1.63
RWRC207 614178 6390917 267 -58 270 222 No significant mineralisation
RWRC208 614220 6390920 266 -58 270 300 275 276 1 2.23
RWRC209 614098 6390860 268 -58 270 228 99 112 13 0.90
incl 108 110 2 2.40
and 115 116 1 0.65
and 182 183 1 1.02
and 190 191 1 0.93
and 214 216 2 1.97
RWRC211 614041 6390698 267 -58 270 252 63 69 6 1.12
and 101 112 11 1.30
incl 105 107 2 2.51
and 141 156 15 1.39
incl 143 146 3 2.87
and 222 243 21 0.57
incl 237 243 6 1.07
RWRC215 614047 6390718 267 -58 270 275 90 114 24 1.19
incl 99 102 3 4.03
and 150 159 9 1.13
and 201 204 3 1.27
and 207 258 51 0.59
incl 222 228 6 1.13
RWD023 613761 6389701 266 -60 270 329 141 142 1 2.14
and 145 150 5 1.79 San Antonio

10/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
incl 146 147 1 5.03 San Antonio
and 165 167 2 0.77
RWD024 613783 6389719 266 -60 270 354 184 191 7 1.97
incl 184 186 2 4.59
and 201 219 18 1.51
incl 203 205 2 3.67
also 213 215 2 6.66
and 228 230 2 1.27
and 233 234 1 0.54
and 236 244 8 3.08
incl 239 240 1 11.1
RWD025 613789 6389798 266 -60 270 303 154 155 1 1.03
and 175 178 3 0.68
RWD026 613759 6389760 266 -58 270 297 137 148 11 2.50
incl 143 146 3 5.59
and 155 157 2 0.63
and 165 168 3 1.03
and 184 187 3 1.64
and 204 205 1 0.89
RWD027 613789 6389899 267 -60 270 325 No significant mineralisation
RWD028 613782 6389839 266 -60 270 301 No significant mineralisation
RWD029 613738 6389939 266 -60 270 373 200 206 6 1.80
incl 204 205 1 4.36
and 247 248 1 1.33
and 282 283 1 0.72
RWD030 613778 6389979 266 -60 270 349 253 269 16 1.77
incl 254 258 4 3.99
and 271 272 1 0.51
and 280 285 5 2.01
incl 280 281 1 4.88
and 293 302 9 0.57
incl 297 299 2 1.31
RWD031 613785 6390022 266 -60 270 306 No significant mineralisation
RWD032 613880 6390118 267 -60 270 411 253 254 1 3.77
and 353 354 1 0.51
RWD034 613877 6389979 267 -60 270 493 360 364 4 0.91
incl 361 362 1 2.54
and 391 394 3 0.52
and 429 433 4 0.56
and 453.3 454.7 1.4 7.26
RWRC174 613864 6390018 266 -58 268 90* Hole abandoned early
RWRC175 613579 6389480 266 -58 267 210 No significant mineralisation
RWRC176 613616 6389479 266 -58 270 138* Hole abandoned early
RWRC177 613670 6389518 266 -58 270 192 180 181 1 0.9
RWRC178 613665 6389557 266 -60 270 252 174 176 2 1.18

11/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au) Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT RC AND DIAMOND DRILLING – March 2020(>0.5g/t Au)
Hole ID Easting Northing RL Dip Azimuth Total Interval Interval Intercept Au Prospect
(MGA) (MGA) (m) (Grid) Depth From(m) To(m) (m) (g/t)
and 180 188 8 1.83 San Antonio
incl 181 183 2 5.30
and 190 191 1 0.51
RWRC210 613884 6390183 267 -60 270 294 251 252 1 0.60
RWRC212 613801 6390117 266 -58 270 186* 141 156 15 4.33
incl 144 147 3 12.4
and 168 171 3 1.52
RWRC213 613725 6390020 266 -58 270 180 60** 69 9 0.67
and 147 162 15 7.43
RWRC214 613867 6390015 267 -58 270 120* Hole abandoned early
  • hole abandoned early. ** From base of alluvium. True widths are approximately 60%.

12/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [57 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Competent Person

Unless otherwise advised above, the information in this report that relates to exploration results being reported for the first time is based on information compiled by Mr David Meates MAIG, (Alkane Senior Exploration Geologist) who has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Meates has provided his prior written consent to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to previously reported exploration results and exploration targets is extracted from the Company’s ASX announcements noted in the text of the announcement and are available to view on the Company’s website. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcements and that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially altered.

Disclaimer

This report contains certain forward looking statements and forecasts, including possible or assumed reserves and resources, production levels and rates, costs, prices, future performance or potential growth of Alkane Resources Ltd, industry growth or other trend projections. Such statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors which are beyond the control of Alkane Resources Ltd. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward looking statements depending on a variety of factors. Nothing in this report should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities.

This document has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Australian securities laws, which may differ from the requirements of United States and other country securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all ore reserve and mineral resource estimates included or incorporated by reference in this document have been, and will be, prepared in accordance with the JORC classification system of the Australasian Institute of Mining, and Metallurgy and Australian Institute of Geoscientists.

This document has been authorised for release to the market by Nic Earner, Managing Director. ABOUT ALKANE - www.alkane.com.au - ASX: ALK

Alkane is a gold production company with a multi-commodity exploration and development portfolio. Alkane’s projects are predominantly in the Central West region of NSW, but extend throughout Australia through investments in other gold exploration and mining companies.

Alkane’s gold production is from the Tomingley Gold Operations (TGO) which has been operating since early 2014 and it’s most advanced gold exploration projects are in the 100% Alkane owned tenement area between TGO and Peak Hill and have the potential for sourcing additional ore for TGO.

Alkane has other 100% owned exploration tenements in the Central West NSW prospective for gold and copper. The recently announced significant porphyry gold-copper mineralisation intersected at Boda is an example of this potential.

Alkane’s largest non-gold project is the Dubbo Project (DP), a large in-ground resource of zirconium, hafnium, niobium, yttrium and rare earth elements. As it is an advanced polymetallic project outside China, it is a potential strategic and independent supply of critical minerals for a range of sustainable technologies and future industries. It has a potential mine life of 75+ years. The DP is development ready, subject to financing, with the mineral deposit and surrounding land acquired and all major State and Federal approvals in place.

==> picture [229 x 336] intentionally omitted <==

13/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

The following tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012) edition requirements for the reporting of exploration results.

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT 9 March 2020

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down
hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
RC samples are collected at one metre intervals via a cyclone on the rig. The cyclone is cleaned regularly to
minimise any contamination.
Half core samples are collected at generally one metre intervals.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
Drilling, sampling and QAQC procedures are carried out to industry standards.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases
where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce
a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where
there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
RC Drilling – the total sample (~20-30kg) is delivered via cyclone into a large plastic bag which is retained for
future use if required. A sub-sample of approximately 1kg is spear sampled from each plastic bag and
composited to make a 3 metres sample interval. If strong mineralisation is observed by the site geologist
this is sampled as a final 1m interval instead. The 1m intervals forming composite samples assaying ≥0.20
g/t Au or with high As are resplit using a cone splitter on the rig into a separate calico at the time of drilling
and re-submitted to the laboratory for re-assay.
Core is cut in half using an Almonte diamond cutting saw.
All samples sent to laboratory are crushed and/or pulverised to produce a ~100g pulp for the assay process.
Gold was determined by fire assay fusion of a 50g charge with an AAS analytical finish.
A multi-element suite was determined using an aqua regia or multi-acid digest with an AES, MS analytical
finish.
Drilling techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Reverse circulation (RC) drilling using 110mm rods 144mm face sampling hammer.
Core drilling completed as an HQ tail on an air-core precollar. Core orientated using a Reflex tool
Drill sample
recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
Sample quality is assessed by the sampler by visual approximation of sample recovery and if the sample is
dry, damp or wet.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.
A high capacity RC rig was used to enable dry samples collected. Drill cyclone and sample buckets are
cleaned between rod changes and after each hole to minimise cross-hole contamination.
Core drillingcompleted usingHQtriple tube to maximise core recovery

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
There is no known relationship between sample recovery and grade.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of
detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
Each one metre interval is geologically logged for characteristics such as lithology, weathering, alteration
(type, character and intensity), veining (type, character and intensity) and mineralisation (type, character
and volume percentage).

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
All logging is qualitative with visual estimates of the various characteristics.

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
A representative sample of each one metre interval is retained in chip trays for future reference. Half core
samples are retained in trays for future reference.

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
All samples have been geologically logged by qualified geologists.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.
Core is cut with half core submitted to the laboratory.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
Each one metre interval is spear sampled with 3m composite samples collected in a calico sample bag and
forwarded to the laboratory. Where strong mineralisation is observed by the site geologist, instead of
compositing, this is individually sampled from the cone splitter on the RC rig as a 1 metre interval into a
calico bag and forwarded to the laboratory.
The 1m intervals forming composite samples assaying ≥0.20 g/t Au or with high As are resplit using a cone
splitter on the rig during the time of drilling and re-submitted to the laboratory for re-assay.
Laboratory Preparation – the entire sample (~3kg) is dried and pulverised in an LM5 (or equivalent) to ≥85%
passing 75µm. Bulk rejects for all samples are discarded. A pulp sample (±100g) is stored for future
reference.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
ALK sampling techniques are of industry standard and considered adequate.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
Field duplicate samples collected at every stage of sampling to control procedures - ~1:50 alternating with
CRM.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
Duplicate samples are collected for both composite intervals and re-split intervals. Duplicates generally
show excellent repeatability.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
Sample sizes are industry standard and considered appropriate.
Quality of assay
data and
laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or total.
Gold is determined using a 50g charge fused at approximately 1100°C with alkaline fluxes, including lead
oxide. The resultant prill is dissolved in aqua regia with gold determined by flame AAS.
For other geochemical elements, samples are digested by aqua regia or multi-acid with each element
determined by ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometry or ICP Mass Spectrometry. These additional elements are
generally only used for geological interpretation purposes, are not of economic significance and are not
routinely reported.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in
determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.
No down hole geophysical logging or hand held XRF analyses undertaken.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external
laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision
_have been established. _
Commercially prepared Certified Reference Materials (CRM) are inserted at 1 in 50 samples. CRM’s are not
identifiable to the laboratory.
Field duplicate samples are inserted at 1 in 50 samples (alternate to CRM’s).
Laboratory QAQC sampling includes insertion of CRM samples, internal duplicates and screen tests. This
data is reported for each sample submission.
Failed standards result in re-assaying of portions of the affected sample batches.

15/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Verification of
sampling and
assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company
personnel.
Drill data is compiled and collated, and reviewed by senior staff. External consultants do not routinely verify
exploration data until resource estimation procedures are deemed necessary.

The use of twinned holes.
No twinned holes have been drilled at this stage of exploration.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
All drill hole logging and sampling data is entered directly into field data entry spreadsheets for transfer and
storage in an industry standard access database with verification protocols in place.
All primary assay data is received from the laboratory as electronic data files which are imported into
sampling database with verification procedures in place. QAQC analysis is undertaken for each laboratory
report.
Digital copies of Certificates of Analysis (COA) are stored in a central database with regular (daily) backup.
Original survey data is stored on site.
Data is also verified on import into various software packages.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
No assay data was adjusted.
Location of data
points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys),
trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
Drill holes are laid out using hand held GPS (accuracy ± 2m) then DGPS surveyed accurately (± 0.1m) on
completion.

Specification of the grid system used.
MGA (Zone 55), GDA94

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
As noted above, all drill holes DGPS surveyed accurately (± 0.1m) on completion.
Data spacing and
distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
The exploration results are part of a 40 metre by 40 metre drill hole grid pattern.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)
and classifications applied.
No resource estimations have been undertaken yet.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.
3m sample composites collected as described above.
Orientation of
data in relation to
geological
structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the
extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.
Early phase drilling at San Antonio prospect, however core holes RWD002 and RWD004 measured
mineralised structures dipping 70o- 85oto the east. Drill holes are collared 58oto the west which is
considered practical for a drill rig and approximately 60% to intersecting the mineralised structures.
Early phase drilling at Roswell prospect, however core holes RWD001 and RWD003 measured mineralised
veins dipping 53oto the east. Drill holes are collared 58oto the west which is considered practical for a drill
rig and approximately 90% to intersecting the mineralised veins.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and
reported if material.
It is not thought that drilling direction will bias assay data significantly.
Sample security
The measures taken to ensure sample security.
All samples are bagged in tied numbered calico bags, grouped into larger tied polyweave bags and
transported 1.5 hour to ALS in Orange by Alkane personnel. All sample submissions are documented via ALS
tracking system and all assays are reported via email.

16/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sample pulps are returned to site and stored for an appropriate length of time (minimum 3 years).
The Company has in place protocols to ensure data security.
Audits or reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.
The Company does not routinely have external consultants verify exploration data until resource estimation
procedures are deemed necessary.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues
with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,
historical sites, wilderness or nationalpark and environmental settings.
Drilling completed on exploration licence number 5675 is owned 100% by Alkane.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
All exploration licences are in good standing.
EL5675 expires on 17 January 2023
Exploration done
by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
Significant exploration has been completed in the area by Alkane since 2001 and the Tomingley
Gold Mine was commissioned in 2014.
Minor work was completed by previous companies in EL5675 area covered by this announcement
but many holes did not penetrate the cover sequence.
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.
Mineralisation at Tomingley is associated with quartz veining and alteration focused within porphyritic
sub-volcanic andesite sills and adjacent volcaniclastic sediments. The deposits appear to have
formed as the result of a competency contrast between the porphyritic sub-volcanic sills and the
surrounding volcaniclastic sediments, with the sills showing brittle fracture and the sediments ductile
deformation, and have many similarities to well documented orogenic - lode-style gold deposits.
Geological nature of the Tomingley Deposits is well documented elsewhere.
Geological nature of Peak Hill is well documented elsewhere.
Geological nature of Glen Isla is fine grained low-sulfidation epithermal Au mineralisation that was
discovered in Middle Devonian continental felsic volcanic sequences (Dulladerry Volcanics) in the
Young Zone. The gold prospective Dulladerry Volcanics host a number of low sulfidation epithermal
occurrences including the Mt Aubrey gold deposit (120,000 t @ 3.3 g/t Au) and are broadly similar in
age (~370Ma) to dates published (~350 - 360 Ma) for volcanic units that host well known Drummond
Basin epithermal Au deposits in north Queensland. Dulladerry Volcanics include flow banded
rhyolites and quartz feldspar porphyries and are locally bimodal, with amygdaloidal basalts identified
at Glen Isla and Mt Aubrey.
Drill hole
Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including
a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:
o
easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o
elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar
o
dip and azimuth of the hole
See body of announcement and figures.

17/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020

==> picture [58 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
o
down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material
and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent
Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
Required information on all drill holes included in body of announcement.
Data aggregation
methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum
grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and
should be stated.
Exploration results reported –
for uncut gold grades;
grades are calculated by length weighted average.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths
of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some
typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.
Reported intercepts are calculated using a lower cut of 0.5g/t Au.
No top cut has been used.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.
No metal equivalents are reported.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results -
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known,
its nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a
clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).
The mineralisation is structurally complex and drilling is reconnaissance in nature and there is
currently minimal understanding of the true widths. Down hole lengths reported – true widths
estimated to be 60% of the down hole length.
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included
for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan
view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Plans and sections are included in the body of the announcement.
Balanced
reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative
reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results.
All completed drill holes are listed with samples assaying significant gold of ≥0.5g/t Au have been
reported.
Other substantive
exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not
limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results;
bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,
groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
No other exploration data is available to assist in interpretation
Further work
The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth
extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
The current drilling is part of a 60,000 metre resource definition program. Further drilling to test
lateral extensions are also ongoing.

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially
sensitive.
See figures included in the announcement.

18/18

Alkane Resources Ltd – TGP Exploration Update 9 March 2020